HomeMy WebLinkAbout06080 ORD - 02/22/1961AN ORDINANCE 6380
CLOSING THE REARING GIM TO THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF PROPERTY
AB=2W—UMN WEBER ROAD FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF
-SOUTH STAPLES STREET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF LEKINGTfHN
BOULEVARD AND GOLLIHAR ROAD FROM 120 FEET SOUTHEAST TO 120 FEET NORTH-
WEST OF WEBER ROAD AS TO SPECIAL BENEFITS TO ACCRUE TO SAID PROPERTY
AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF BY VIRTUE OF THE IMp1T OF
SAID STREETS WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFIIIND, AND AS TO ANY ERRORS, AND
INVALIDITIES OR IRREGULARITIES IN ANY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF CONTRACT
THEREOF, OVERRULING AND DENYING ALL PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS_ OFFERED,
EXCEPT THE CHANGES REFLECTED HERE , FIMING AND DETERMINING THAT TBE
PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, WILL
BE SPECIALLY BENEFITED AND ENHANCED IN VALUE IN EXCESS OF TEE AMOUNT
OF THE COST OF SAID IMpROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO BE AND AS HEREIN ASSESSED
AGAZST SAID PROPERTY. ABUTTING UPON A PORTION OF WEBER ROAD AND
GOLLIHAR ROAD, AND LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT FOR THE PAYMENT OF A PORTION
CU; THE COST OF IMFROn2[ NTS ON SAID STREETS, WITHIN SAID LIMITS,
FIXING A CHARGE AND LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREETS
AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, PROVIDING FOR THE
ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES UPON THE CMWLEPION AND ACCEPTANCE
OF SAID WORK, THE MANNER AND TIME OF PAYMENT AND PBOVIDINO THE MANNER
AND METHOD OF COLLECTION OF SAID ASSESSMENTS AND CERTIFICATES; AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY,
w—HE,AS, The City Council of Corpus Christi, Texas, by duly enacted
ordinance passed and approved on January 11, 1881, determined the necessity for,
and ordered the improvement of Weber Road and Gollihar Road, within the limits
hereinafter defined, in the manner and according to the plans and specifications
heretofore approved and adopted by the City Council by ordinance dated ftouafiy
11,1081, said portion of said streets to be improved being as follows, to —witt
Weber Road from the Southeasterly boundary line of South Staples
Street to the Northeasterly boundary line of Lexington Boulevard
and Gollibar Road from 120 feet Southeast to 120 feet Northwest
of Weber Road;
a duly executed notice of said ordinance having been filed in the name of said
City with the County Clerk of Nueces County, Texas; and
WiMMAS, said City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, after
having advertised for and received bids on the construction of said improvements
for the length of time and in the manner and form as required by the Charter of
said City and the laws of the State of Texas, and after hiving duly and regularly
made appropriation of funds available for such purpose to cover the estimated cost
of said improvements to said City, all as provided by the Corpus Christi City
Charter and by law, did award a contract for the construction of said improvements
to South Texas Construction Co. on their lowest and most advantageous bid and said
contract has been heretofore duly executed by said City of Corpus Christi and
0' 1 .
South Texas Construction Co, and is dated December 14, 19909 and the Performance
Bond required by said contract has been properly furnished by said South Texas
Construction Co., and accepted by said City Council of said City as to form and
amount as required by the Charter of said City and the laws of the State of Texas;
and
WEMAS, the said City Council has caused the Director of Public Works
to prepare and file estimates of the cost of such improvements and estimates of
the amount per front foot proposed to be assessed against the property abutting
upon Weber Road and Gollihar Road, within the limits herein defined, to be improved,
and the real and true owners thereof, and said Director of Public Works has heretofore
filed said estimates and a statement of other matters relating thereto with said
City Council, and same has been received, examined and approved by said City
Council; and,
wBEwrac, said City Council, by duly enacted ordinance dated January 11,
1901s did determine the necessity of levying an assessment for that portion of the
cost of constructing said improvements on Weber Road and Gollihar Road, within the
limits herein defined, to be paid by the abutting property and the real and true
owners thereof, and did order and set a hearing to be held at 3 :00 o'clock P.M. on
January 25, 1991, in the Council Chamber of the City Hall of Corpus Christi, Texas,
for the real and true owners of the property abutting upon said streets, within
the limits above defined, and for all others owning or claiming any interest in, or
otherwise interested In said property, or any of said matters as to the assessments
and amounts to be assessed against each parcel of abutting property and the real
and true owner or owners thereof, and as to the special benefits to accrue to said
abutting property by virtue of said improvements, if any, or concerning any error,
Invalidity, irregularity or deficiency in any proceedings, or contract, to appear
and be beard in person or by counsel and offer evidence in reference to said
matters; and said City Council did by said ordinance order and direct the City
Secretary to give notice of said hearing to the real and true owners of the property
abutting upon said streets, within the limits defined, by publication in the
Corpus Christi Times, the official newspaper of the City of Corpus Christi, a
newspaper published in the City of Corpus Cbristi, Texas, of general circulation,
—2—
said notice to be published in said newspaper at least three (3) times prior to
the date of said hearing, the first publication of which to be at least ten (10)
days prior thereto, all as provided for and in accordance with the provisions of
said City Charter and of Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First Called Session of
the 40th Legislature of the State of Texas, ]mown and shown as Article 1106 —b of
Vernon *s Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas; and
WHEREAS, said City Council did further order and direct said City Secretary,
in addition to said published notice as aforesaid, which was provided to be valid and
sufficient in Itself, to include in said notice a list of the apparent owners of
said abutting property as set out in said Director of Public Works* written report,
and providing that said list of apparent owners and the descriptions of said
properties, so included, shall be cumulative of and in addition to the requirements
of said notice as required by law and shall not be conclusive as to the real and
true owners or the descriptions of said abutting property nor limit said notice to
such owners named, or the properties described, but that said notice shall neverthe-
less be directed to the real and true owner or owners of said abutting property,
whether named or correctly named, or said property described or correctly described
therein or not; and
SAS, said notice as ordered and directed by said City Council and as
required by said Acts and Charter of said City as above identified, was duly given
publication of same in the Corpus Christi Times, a newspaper published in the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, on January 14, 1961, January 19, 1961 and January 24,
1981, said notice so published having included therein a list of the apparent owners
as set out in said Director of Public Works* written report as directed in the
aforesaid ordinance; and
SAS, after due, regular and proper notice thereof, all as provided by la®
and the Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, said hearing, of which notice was
given, was opened and held on January 28, 1961, at 3:00 o *clock P.B., in the
Council Chamber of the City Hall in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, in accordance
with said ordinance and notice, at which time an opportunity was given to all said
above mentioned persons, firms, corporations and estates, their agents and attorneys,
to be heard and to offer evidence as to all matters in accordance with said ordinance
and notice, at which time the following appeared and offered the following testimony:
—3—
There being no farther testimony offered or any further parties appearing
to be heard, upon proper motion, duly seconded and unanimously carried, the said
hearing was declared closed= and
WEWRBAS, no further parties appearing and no further testimony being offered
as to the special benefits in relation to the enhanced value of said abutting
property as compared with the cost of making said improvements of said portion of
said streets proposed to be assessed against said property, or as to any errors,
invalidities or irregularities, in the proceedings or contract heretofore had in
reference to the improvements of said streets= and
WMZFX%AS; said City Council has heard evidence as to the special benefits
and enhanced value to accrue to said abutting property, and the real and tree owner
or owners thereof, as compared with the cost of making said improvements OR said
streets, within the limits above defined, and has heard all parties appearing and
offering testimony, together with all protests and objections relative to such
matters and as to any errors, invalidities or irregularities in any of the proceed —
Inge and contract for said improvements, and has given a full and fair hearing to
all parties making or desiring to make any such protest, objection, or offer
testimony and has fully examined and considered all evidence, matters, objections
and protests offered and based upon said evidence, testimony and statements, said
City Council finds that each and every parcel of property abutting upon that portion
of Veber Road and Rollibar Road, within the limits to be improved as herein defined,
will be enhanced in value and specially benefited by the construction of said
improvements upon the said streets upon which said property abuts, in an amount
In excess of the amount of the cost of said improvements proposed to be, and as
hereinbelow assessed against each and every said parcel of abutting property, and
the real and true owners thereof, and said City Council did consider and correct all
errors, invalidlties or deficiencies called to its ittention and did find that all
proceedings and contracts were proper and in accordance with the Charter of said City
and the laws of the State of Texas, under which those proceedings were being had,
and the proceedings of said City Council heretofore bad with reference to such
improvements, and in all respects to be valid and regulars and said City Council
did further find upon said evidence that the assessments hereinbelow made and the
C�
charges hereby declared against said abutting property on said portion of Weber
Road and Gollihar Road, within the limits above defined, and the real and true
owner or owners thereof, are just and equitable and did adopt the rule of apportion-
ment set forth below and the division of the cost of said improvements between
said abutting properties, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, as just
and equitable, and as producing substantial equality considering the benefits to
be received and the burdens imposed thereby, and that all objections and protests
should be overruled and deniedt
NOW, THERR M, HE rr ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY CF CORM
CHRISTI, THUS:
SECTION 1. That there being no farther protest or testimony for or against
said improvements, said hearing granted to the real and true owners of abutting
property on said streets, within the limits above defined, and to all persons, firms,
corporations and estates, owning or claiming same or any interest therein, be, and
the same is hereby closed and all protests and objections, whether specifically
mentioned or not, shall be, and the same are hereby overruled and denied.
SECTION 2. That said City Council hereby finds and determines upon the
evidence heard in reference to each and every parcel of property abutting upon
Weber Road and Gollihar Road, within the limits defined, that the special benefits
in the enhanced value to accrue to said property and the real and true owner or owners
thereof, by virtue of the construction of said improvements to said portion of
said streets upon which said property abuts, will be in excess of the amount of
the cost of said improvements as proposed to be, and as herein assessed against
said abutting property and the real and true owners thereof, and finds that the
apportionment of the cost of said improvements, and that all assessments hereinbelow
made are just and equitable and produce substantial equality considering the
benefits received and the burdens imposed thereby, and are in accordance with the
laws of the State of Texas, and the Charter provisions of the City of Corpus
Christi, Texas, and that the proceedings and contract heretofore had with reference
to said improvements are in all respects regular, proper and valid, and that all
prerequisites to the fixing of the assessment liens agaiaet said abutting properties,
-5-
r
• r
as hereinabove described and the personal liability of the real and true owner or
owners thereof, whether named or correctly named herein or not, have been in all
things regularly had and performed in compliance with the lawn, Charter provisions
and proceedings of the said City Council.
SWTION 3. That in pursuance of said ordinance, duly enacted by said City
Council, authorizing and ordering the improvements of Weber Road and Oollihar Road,
within the limits hereinabove defined, and in pursuance of said proceedings hereto-
fore had and enacted by said City Council in reference to said improvements and
by virtue of the powers vested in said City with respect to said street improvements
by the laws of the State of Texas and the Charter of said City, with particular
reference to Chapter 100 of the Acts of the First Called Session of the 40th
Legislature of the State of Texas, known and shown as Article 1105-b of Vernon *s
Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas, as amended, there shall be, and is hereby
levied, assessed and taxed against the respective parcels of property abutting upon
said portion of said streets, and against the real and true owners thereof, whether
such real and true owner or owners be named or correctly named herein or not, the
several sums of money hereinbelow mentioned and itemized opposite the description
of the respective parcels of said property, the number of front feet of each and
the several amounts assessed against same and the real and true owner or owners
thereof, and names of the apparent owners thereof, all as corrected and adjusted
by said City Council, being as follows, to -wits
-8-
low
Fer• STREET Sheet No. 1
NORTH WEST SIDE WEA0 ROAD 80UTR STAPLE'S ST. TO LEXMTON BOWWARD
OF IMPROVEMENT: -mix AeDhaltln Coacrete Pavement, 0�ab CONSTRUCTION CCHPANY
Gutter. Sidewajks. Driveways and Stems , to Face of Curbs ROADWAY•
i ,j+e
Zoned R -1 or R -2 Assessment for Curb and Gutter and Pavement Per Lin. Ft ........... �5.
CONTRACT nTM December 14, 1960 Zoned Other than $ -1 or R-2 Assessment for Curb and. Gutter & Pavement Per Lin. Ft.
Assessment for Sidewalk Per Square Foot ..........................
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Foot i w ............................... 0.
R
LIN. FT.
PERCENT
A8
SIDEWALK
DRIVE-
DRIVEWAY
TOT.
TOTAL
PROPERTY.ONNER
OF ADDITION
BLOCK
LOT
ABUT.
OF III-
TYPE CF
OF ASSESS
CURB & GUT-
SID WALK
NAY
ASSESS-
NM BEFORE
ASSESSMIM
ADJUSTED
PROP.
OVANST
ZONING
CUARGEABU
I TER & PVT.
SA. FT.
KENT
SQ.FT.
MW
ADJUSTMENT
ADROTMEWT
WSESOM
Markin Pleoe
R. Markin .
Replat Lot 25
1
A
130
130.00
B-1
100%
1454.70
450.00
1.80.98
IM-13
126. ic
1,760.80
297.31`
1,k63 -, 9'
B &
2.
R. H. Yoxkins
" "
1.;.:
Alley
02.52
102.52
13-1
100%
1,147.20
220.08
88.03
459-39
344.5L
1,579.77
-0 -.
1,579•77
3.
Seldou Broughton
Markin Place
1
27
70.06
70.06
R-1
25%
102.99
280.24
28.02
-0-
0. Oc
131.01
-0-
131.01
4.
William D. Bosten
1
28
65.00
65.00.
R -1
25%
95.55
260.00
26.00
-o-
0. Oc
121.55
-0-
121,55
5.
Billy Charles Ko..
1
29
65.00l
65.00
R -1
25%
95.55
266.00
26.00
-0-
0.09
121.55
-0-
1 1:55
6i
M.X, Fasterling
"
1
0
6o.00
6o.00
R -1
25
88.20
24o.00
24.00
-o-
0.0
112.20
-0-
112.20
7.
Alfred F. Haaker
"
1
31
60.00
6o.00
R -1
25%
88.20
240.00
24.00
-0-
0. Oc
112.20
-0-
112:20
Leroy H. Loewen
1
32
65.00
.65.00
R -1
25%
95. 5
260.00
26.00
-0-
0.
21.55
-0-
9.
Jack Q. Lancaster
"
1
33•
65.00
65.00
R -1
25%
95.55
260.00
26.
-0-
0.00
121-55
j -0-
12 .
10
Aron W. Hopper
"
1
34
65.00
65.00
R -1
25%
95;55
260.00
26.
-0-
0.00
121.55
-0-
121.55'
W A SSE
R M A 17
S T R E E
T
11
Billy K. Jesse
Markin Place
4
1
56.98
56.98
R -1
25%
83.76
227.92
22.
-0-
0.00
106.55
-0-
106.
12
Cordon L. Kindflish
4
2
60.00
60.00
R -1
25%
88.20
240.00
24. Oc
-0-
0.00
112.20
-0
112. 0
F Sheet No. 2
rNaT.:- sTHE�r rniranylam aamr_asnnEflm
,>EN
NORTH WEST SIDE MEggJ ROAD SOUTH STAPLES ST. TO LEXINGTON BOULEVARD
E OF IMPROVEMEBJT Hot -mix Asvhaltic Concrete Pavement Curb and SOUO TEXAS CONSTRU CTTON QQMANT CONTRACTOR
Gutter, Sidewalks, Driveways and Storm Severs 60' Face to Face of Curbs ROADWAY
CONTRACT DATE: December 14, 1960 Zoned R -1 or R -2 Assessment for Curb and Gutter and Pavement Per Lin. Ft. . . . . $ '•88
Zoned Other` than R-1 or R -2 Assessment for Curb and Gutter & Pavement Per Lin.Ft. $11 -1;a
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.40
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Foot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.75
0
z
PROPERTY OWNER
ENGTH
LIN. FT.
PERCENT
ASSESSMENT
SIDEWALK
DRIVE-
DRIVEWAY
POT. ASSESS-
TOTAL
NAME OF ADDITION
BLOCj
LOT
ART
OF IM-
TYPE OF
OF ASSESS
CURB & GUT
SIDEWALK
ASSESS-
WAY
SESS-
VMaT BEFORE
ASSESSMENT
ADIUSTED
H
PROP.
IROVEWT
ZONING CHARGEABLE
TER & PVT.
SQ. FT.
MENT
SQ. FT.
MENT
STMENT
ADJUSTMENT
ASSESSMENT
W A S S
E R M A N
S T R E E
T
13•
Homer C. Innis
Markins Place
4
3
60.
60.00
R -1
25%
88. "_0
240.00
24.00
-o-
0.00
J. 1?,;:0 -0-
112.PO
Leon Seidenberger
4
4
60.
60.00
R -1
25%
88.'0
14.
240.00
24.00
-o-
0.00
;1 ?.'0 -0-
1.12.20.
15.
Eugene Collins
4
5
6o.
60.00
R -1
25%
88.20
240.00
24.00
-o-
0.00
j;?. PC) -0-
112.20
MarvCu R. Hall
"
4
6
60.
60.00
R -1
25%
88._o
16.
240.00
24.00
-0-
0.00
U 2. ?0 -0-
LJ2.2C'
1*(.
Ralph Meeks
"
4
7
60.
60.00
R -1
25%
88.x_0
240.00
24.00
-o-
0.00
11?.f-G -0-
li2.20
8.
Thomas L. Reed
"
4
8
60.
60.00
R -1
251
88.20
24o.00
24.00
-o-
0.00
11. ^ -.2C
-0-
1 °.?
19.
Kenneth Vaughan
"
4
9
6o.
60.00
R -1 25%
88.20
240.00
24.00
-0-
0.00
112.26
-0-
112.20
20.
John T. Evans
"
4
10
60.
60.00
R -1 25%
88. ^0
240.00
24.00
-0-
0.00
]1?.?0
-O-
21.
Cent Henderson
4
11
60.
60.00
R -1 25%
88,.•0
240.00
24.00
-o-
0.00
1] .'0
-0"
L1R.20
22.
LeRoy Kendricks
4
12
60.
60.00
R -1 25%
88 „0
240.00
24.00
-0-
0.00
ll2.: ?G -0-
112.20
23.
Cleo Blankenship
"
4
13
60.
60.00
R -1
25%
88.20
240.00
24.o0
-0-
0.00
1!F'.2p
-0-
Li2.20
24.
Palmerest Bapt. Ch.
4
14
60.
60.00
R -1
25%
88.20
240.00
24.00
-0-
0.00
112.20
-0-
112.20
Snm H. Smith
"
4
15
6o.
6o.00
R -1
25%
88.20
24o.00
24.00
-o-
0.00
-0-
1.12.PO
11'.20
26.
Thomas Harvard
"
4
16
60.
60.00
R -1
25%
88.20
240.00
24.00
-0-
0.00
1 1.2.20 -0-
112.20
> ;,'..�
~�.,,,r
i
�. -..:_ +�`.'� . �:,,_ '.'! Yt �P .... r� ff� .y, : "`-�3i �•h�4a.�i .... .- `l�i. t S` 4.T - - Y
. ... S �yy
-
Y
�x _
aT0
f, ROAD OWNdYI.I`IL@{., VWj6S ST. LEl.iliVL -ON yVV..O.l{LW
tr
E OF IMPROVEMM; riot -mix Asphaltic Concrete Pavement, Curb and SO TEXAS CONSTRUCTION COMPAQ CONTRACTOR
,_ nr ys 60' Face tc
Clutter Ridewalma Yhjve n±,d Rt�rm .^Savers Face of Clurbs .ROADWAY
Zoned R -1 or R -2 Assessment for Curb and Gutter and 'Pavement Per Lin. Ft. .,
CONTRACT DATE:- December 14. 1960' Zoned Other •than R -1 or R -2 Assessment for Curb and Cutter &Pavement Per Lin. Ft. .1
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0,
_
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Foot. ". ... . . . . . . . . .
L�
LIN' FT.
PERCENT
9PEN'P.
SIDEWALK
DRIVE-
DRIVEWAY
TOT.
TOTAL
PROPERTY OWrW
NAME,-OF ADDITION
BLO
LOT
ABUT.
OF IM-.
TYPE -OF
F ASSESS.
CURB & OUT
SIDEWALK
ASSESS
WAY
S-
MENT BEFORE
ASSESSMENT
ADJUSTED
..
PROP.
PRO
DOiINi .
TR &: T.
SQ. FT.
MEN'T -.
SQ. FT.
Hm
ADJUSTMENT
ADJUSTMENT'
ASSESSMENT
R I: a
D R I V E
27•.Frank
S. Barham
Mftrkini; Place
3
1
150,
190•
R -1
66p
582.12`
600.00.
158_. 40
-0-
0.00
7+ 2
-O=
40. 52
28.
Fred F.: Givins
'Perkside
5
12
90.
9p •
R -1,.
25�
1'.2.30'
-
3.00
36.
-0-
0.00
l Ef�,3G
-.0-
68.
29.
Irwin Colloway
"
5
11
98.78
98-7E
R -1
3196
3 f'
20_
395.12
55.32
-o -.
C_00 .
S, +
- P5� 6_
-0-
'258.51
i
�
•
�0.
C. D. wwuaid
5'
io
5,7-OP
350
]25.97'
34.28
16O.25
160..:5
11.
P. J. Bradshaw
9
.9
e
52.79
.21
60.
R -'I
S
123.4'8
-a
-
240.00
33.60
-G-
0.00
357. -08
157.08
9.79
i'
N. Bails
5
7
31.00
60.
R -1
3
125.10
243.69
.4.
-O-
0.00
15 .22
-0-
- -2
5� _ _
T
40.6T
"
33.
V. R.; B%rris
"
5
6.
21.00
67. OC
R -T
35%
137.89
268.00•
37.5
=0-
0.00.
r(5.41.
-o
6
36.00
34.
Raymbald Sykora
•
'
5
42.00
78.
R -1
160.
•00
4 .
=0-
0.00
20r -.Pc
-O-
2 4.2n
15 •
_'1_-
Wilkinson
5
4
17.00
72.OJ
R -1
25i
105.04
288.00
28.
-0-
0.00
4.64
=C-
4,64
a
3
57.00
_
35
49.• 5
_ _
.Oo
230.89
-
y
18`.54
?ii.py
/
J
2
25..79
-
- .. ...
37
Geo. Shaffer
5.
1
59.21
85.
R -1
35%
174.93
340.00
47.5_
-o-
0.00
2-22.53 -
-0-
x22,53
.
a
L I
DEN
8 T R E E T
T� i6L Sbaffer
Faskaide
6
:2
130.
130:
` R-1',
4158.64
520,.00,
1324.8a
246:26
184.70
?68.1
• -0-
•768:j4
_
_
John Vaughn
"
6 ".
A
189.
189:
33-1.
>
2,114.91
320.60
128.
673.52
505.14
2,748.05
- _
2,748SA5
:;-
4
s '
FINAL': STREEP IlVROVEMENT ASSESSMENT Sheet No. 4
NORTH WEST SIDE WEBER ROAD SOUTH STAPLES ST. TO LEXINGTON BOULEVARD
E OF IMPROVEMENT: Hot -mix Asphaltic Concrete Pavement, Curb and SOUTH TEXAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY COPTERACTOR
Gutter, Sidewalks, Driveways and Storm Sewers ' Face to Face of Curb ROAnWAY
Zoned R -1 or R -2 Assessment for Clirb and Gutter and Pavement Per Lin. Ft. _$ 5.88
COTITRACT DATE: December 14, 1960 Zoned Other than R -1 or R -2 Assessment for Curb and Gutter & Pavement Per Lin.Ft..l11.19
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.40
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Foot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.75
LENGTH
LTN. FT.
PERCENT
SESM4ENT
SIDEWALK
DRIVE-
DRIVEWAY
TOT-ASSESS,
TOTAL
PROPERTY OWNER
NAME OF ADDITION
BLOCK
LOT
ABUT.
OF IM-
TYPE OF
OF ASSESS
CURB &
SIDEWAL
ASSESS-
WAY
A S SESS-
MIITT BEFORE
ASSESSMENT
ADJUSTED
H
PROP.
ROVEMENT
ZOT,ING
TARGEABLE
TER & PVT.
SQ. FT.
MENT
SQ. FT.
mENT
ADJUSTMENT
AATUSTb9M
ASSESSMENT
L I
N D E N
S T R E E
arksi e A
4C.
eplat B1k 6 Lot
6
B
150.0
150.00
B -1
lOo%
1,678.50
320.00
128.0
673.52
505.14
2,311.64
-0-
2,311.64
Trinity Factors, Iu
G
I H A.
I R 0 A D
Out of Lot 9, Section
41.
Ada oil Company
aisle 's Sibd. lloffta)
Tr.
137.0
137.00
B-1
100%
1,533-03
268.00
107.2
673.53
505.15
21145-38
-0-
2,145.38
42.
Ralph J. Graham
10O.0
100.00
B =1
100%i
1,119.00
40O. o0
160.0
-0-
0.00
1,279.00
-0-
1,279.00
163.
Gco. R. Whitener
130.
130.00
R -1
100%
764.40
520.00
208.00
111.26
83.45
1,055.8
-0-
1,055.85
44.
Darrell L. Evans
Wilson Terrace
4
10
127.1
127.18
R -1
59.5%
444.95
508.72
121.
-0-
0.00
566.63
-0-
566.03
B A
N E S
3 T R E E T
45.
Joe F. Rogers
Wilson Terrace
3
11
127.1
127.16
R -1
59.5%
444.88
508.64
121.0
-0-
0.00
65. ;,4
-0-
45.
Pauline W. Coe
3
10
127.1
127.18
R -1
59.5%
444•g5
508.72
121.0
-0-
0.00
'66.03
-0-
5Gc'.03
Y L E
R I V E
Selby- Lankford Build-
47.:
in_- Company
2
11
127-16
127.16
R -1
59.5%
444.88
508.64
121.0
-0-
0.00
,x,5•.4
-0-
S.
Jahn V. Marlett
2
10
127-36
127.16
R -1
59.5%
444,88
503.64
121.0
-0-
0.00
�65.,4
-0-
561.c4
B R A D
F O R D
D R I V E
IN
d
i
FIIIAL STREET It+>sROVEKENT ASSE.SMMT Sheet No - 5
NORTH WEST SIDE WEBER ROAD SOUTH STAPLES ST. TO LEXINGTON BOULEVARD
E OF IMPROVIIlENT: Hot -mix Asphaltic Concrete Pavement. Curb and SOUTH TEXAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CONTRACTOR
Gutter, Sidewalks, Driveways and Storm Sewers 60' Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY
$
Zoned R -1 or R -2 Assessment for Curb and Gutter and Pavement Per Lin. Ft. . . . 5.88
CON TRACT DATE: December 14, 1960 Zoned Other than R -1 or R -2 Assessment for Curb and Gutter & Pavement Per lin. Ft. l -i
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 0.40
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Foot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . 0.75
z
LENGTH
LIN.FT.
ERCENT
ASSESSMENT
SIDEWALK
DRIVE-
DRIVEWAY
TOT. ASSESS-
TOTAL
PROPERTY OWNER,
TIME OF ADDITION
BLOM
LOT
ABUT.
OF IM-
TYPE OF
OF ASSES
. CURB & GUI
SIDEWAL
ASSESS-
WAY
ASSESS-
MIT BEFORE
ASSESSMENT
ADJUSTED
ri
PROP.
PROVMM
ZONING
-HARGEABLI
TER & PVT.
SQ. FT.
140TT
SQ. FT.
MENT
ADJUSTMENT
AWUSTNIEMT
ASSESSMENT
D F 0 R
D R I V
49.
' J. Roy Wilso
w-4; Bikrrr[9s. -&I '
Wilson Terrace
1
10
127.4
127.4
R -1
59.5%
445.10
509.80
121.33
-0-
0.00
567,23
-0-
567.23
50.
Wayde L. Watson
Central Parx #4
26
8
123.
123.
R -1
60.27,
438.31
494.72
119.2
-0-
0.00
557.58
-0-
557.58 to
L A
4 0 N T
S T R E E T
51.
Veteran's Admns'.
25
16
115.0
115.0
R -1
60.06%
406.13
460.00
110.5
-0-
0.00
51 6. 64
-0-
57.(4
52•
Lester T.,Spring
25
17
115. 01
115•
R -1
60.60%
409.78
460.00
111.5
-0-
0.00
5 1.r_8
-0-
j21.2P
M A
I I O N
S T R E E T
53•
Mrs. Ethel Walsh
"
24
18
115.0
115.0
R -1
62.08%
419.78
460.00
114.2
-0-
0.00
534.01
-0-
;34.oi
54.
C.C. Builders Inc.
24
19
115.0
115.
R -1
62.68%
423.84
460.00
115.3
-0-
0.00
531• -7:
-0-
539.17
L I N
C 0 L N
S T R E E T
Geo. E. Guckian
23.
18
70.0
70.0
R -1
1
411.60
280.00
112.
-0-
0.00
523•
-0-
523.6
56.
Mn. C. Galbreath
".
23
17
60.0
60.
R -1
100%
.',52.80
208.00
83.2C,
93.26
69.95
505.15
-0-
505•' =15
57.
D. J. Waggoner
23
16
60.0
60.0
R -1
100%
352.80
200.00
80.
111.26
83.45
516-..25
-0-
516.25
John E. Turner
23
15
60.0
6o.
R -1
100%
35?•80
208.00
83.2
93.26
69.95
505.95
-0-
505.95
59.
Chas. F. Stanley
"
23
14
60.0
60.
R -1
100
352.80
208.00
83.
93.26
69.95
505,y5
-0-
505.95
IN
4
Sheet No. 6
FINAL ._' STREET IMPROVEMENT ASS ESSMENT
NORTH WEST BIDE WEBER ROAD SOUTH STAPLES ST. TO LEXINGTON BOULEVARD
E OF IMPROVDE NT• Rot tY Asphaltic Concrete P veient. C+rbd SOUTH TEW CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CONTRACTOR
Gutter, Sidewalks, Driveways and Storm Severe Face to Face of Curb
Zoned R -1 or R -2 Assessment for Curb and Gutter and Pavement per Lin. Ft. . . 5.$8
CONTRACT DATE: December 14, 1960 Zoned Other than R -1 or R -2 Assessment for Curb and Outter & Pavement Per Lin.F.
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot . . . . . . . •
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Foat.
. , , p,
0
PROPERTY OWNER
OF ADDITION
BLOC
LOT
.
�R
LIN.FT.
OF IN-
TYPE OF
PERCENT
OF A5
ASSESSMENT
CURB & GUT
SID
SIDEWALK
ASSESS-
DRIVE-
WAY
DRIVEWAY
ASSESS-
TOT. ASSES
MENT B;
TOTAL
r,
.
ROVE•fENT
ZONING
CHAROX42LE
TER & PVT.
Sq. FT.
MENT
SQ. FT.
MENT
ADJUSTEMEM
ASSESSMENT
AWUSTMENT
ADXUgTED
ASSESSMENT
L I
5 C 0 L N
STREET
60.
Conrad C. Wilson
Central Park h4
23
13
50.0
60.00
R -1
100%
352.80
208.00
83.20
93.26
69.95
505.55
-0-
505.95
61.
W. E. Rhoten
"
23
12
.0
60,00
R -1
100%
352:80 200.00
80.00
111.26
83.45
516.25
_0-
516.25
62.
Walter R. Lowe
23
11
.0
60.00
R -1
1 �
352.80 208.00
8 20
3•
93.26
69.95
5o5•H5
-0-
505.5
63.
Marvin W. Smith
" "
23
10
5.0
65.00
R -1
100%
382.20
228.24
91:30
93.26
69.95
543.45
-0-
543.45
M C
A R D L E
R 0 A D
64.
Wm. A. Bazeman
South Park
8
16
5.0
55,00
R -1
100%
323.40
0.00
0.00
-o-
0.00
323.4a
72.6o
250.86
65.
H. J. Erkert
"
8
17
55.0
55.00.
R -1
100°6,
323-4.0
0.00
0.00
93.26
69.98
1 393.35
142,55
2$0.80
�.
Iva M. Rice
" "
8
18
5.0
55.00
R -1
100%
323.40
0.00
0.00
93.26
69.95
393.35
142.55
250.80
67•i
"Y "goal C. Bailon
8
19
55.0
55.00
R -1
100%
323.40 1
0.00
0.00.
93.26
69.95
393.35
142.55
250,80
68.
Pascual.C. Bailon
8
20
5.0
55.00
R -1
100%
323.40
o,00
0.00
129.26
96.95
420.35
169.55
250.80
69.
Richard P. Elliott
8
21
5.0
55.00
R -1
100%
323.40 o.00
0.00
93.26
69.95
393.35
142.55
250.80
70.
Chas. W. English
"
8
22
5.0
55.00
R -1
100
323.40 0.o0
0.00
11-1.26
83.45
406.85
156.05
250.80
W. P. Murchinson
" "
8
23
5.0
55.00
R -1
100%
323.40 0.00
0.00
93.26
69.95
393.35
142.55
250.80
�2`
Billy G. Roschetz
8
24
,0
,00
R -1
2 .40 0.00
0.00
91.26
s3,_U
142,55
P 50 �8
*.Credit for existing curb and gutter and driveway
i
•
4
Meet No. 7
FI:'iAL .. STREET _INTROVEMENT ASSESSKMr
NORTH WEST SIDE WEBER ROAD SOS1.'H STAPLES ST. TO T. NGTON'BOULEVARD
E OF Il�ROME NT: Hot&mix Asuhaltic Concrete Pavement. Curb and SOUTH TEXAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CONTRACTOR
Gutter, Sidewalks, - Driveways and Storm Sewers 60' Face'tc Face of Curb ROenwgy
Zoned R -1 or R -2 Assessment for Curb and Gutter and Pavement Per Lin. Ft. $ 5.88 `
CONTRACT DATE: December 14, 1960 Zoned Other than R -1 or R-2 Assessment for Curb and Gutter & Pavement per Lin.Ft. 11 19
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 -40
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Foot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ -7;
0
PROPERTY OWNER
NAME OF ADDITION
BLK
TAT
LETW,
ABUT.
PROP.
I LIN.FT.
OF I34-
OVEMT
TYPE OF
ZONING
PERCENT
OF ASSESS
CHARGE L
ASSESSMENT
CURB & GUT
TER & PVT:
SIDEWALK
SQ. 17.
SIDEWALK
ASSESS-
MENT
DRIVE-
WAY
SQ. FT
DRIVEWAY
ASSESS-
MENT
TOT. ASSESS
MU BEFORE
ADJUSThMT
ASSESSM M
ADTUSTMENT
TOTAL
ADJUSTED
ASSESSAMT
14 C
A R D L
R 0
734
Billy A. Bethel
South Park
8
25
55.0
55.00
R -1
100%
323.'+0
-o-
-0-
93.26
69.95
353.35
142.55
^50.80
74
Dr. R. H. Schultz
8
26
55.0
55.00
R -1
100%
X23.40
-0-
-0-
93.26
69.95
30.35
142.55
75
Kenneth McDaniel
" "
8
27
55.0
55.00
R -1
160% .
323.40
-0-
-0-
93.26
69.95
x1,3,37
142.55
250 -0
76
Ralph P. Laughter
S
28
55.0
55.00
R -1
100%
323.40 -o-
-0-
93.26
69.95
31)3.35
142.55
X5^•80
q7
E. M. Hayes.
8
29
55.0
55.00
R -1
100%
323.40
-0-
-0-
93.26
69.95
393.35
142.55
-C.80
78.
Roy P.'Powers
„
8
30
55.0
55.00
R -1
100
323.40
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
323.40
.60.
250 -eO
D E I
P H I N
D R I V
- 79.1
Chaa. R. Ward
10
.17
120.0
120,00
70qg
41)3,92
253.6o
1
101.3
264.26
0. 0
198.2
58.52
-
1.590.8()
_
-0-
758.- f2
1
80.
:R4v. •v. Co,
"
to
16
art o
Lot 1
115.4
B-1
100%
1,291.33
L E X
I N G T
N B L V r.
* Credit for existing curb and gutter and driveway
•
4
Sheet No- 8
EII L-STREW IRPROVEt+�T ASSES
MM EAM SIDE. AMM ROAD SOUTH STAPLES ST. TO LEXING ON BOULEVARD
E OF IMPROVEMENT: Hot-mix Asphaltic Concrete Pavement Curb and SOUTH TEXAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CONTRACTOR
Gutter, Sidewalks. Driveway &pgj Storm Were bOl Face to Face of Curb ROADWAY
Zoned R -1 or R -2 Assessment for Curb and Gutter and Pavement Per Lin. Ft. . .
CONTRACT DATE: 7,.no hwr 74. iq& Zoned Other than R -1 or R -2 Assessment for Curb and Gutter & Pavement Per Lin.Ft.
Assessment for Sidevalk per Square Foot . . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . 0.40
Assessment Por'Ooncrete Driveway per Square Foot . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.
LENGTE
LIN. FT
PERCENT
ASSESSMEN1
SIDEWALK
DRIVE-
DRIVEWAY
TOT.
TOTAL
PROPERTr'tOWNER
NAME OF ADDITIO
BLK
LOT
OF IM-
TYPE OF
OF AS
WM
S
ASSESS-
WAY
ASSESS-
MENT
A
ADJUSTED
PROP.
ROVEMEN<f
ZONING,
CHAR
TER & PVT.
SQ. PT.
MENT
SQ. FT.
MENT
ADJUST f
ADJUSTMENT
ASSESSMENT
S O
U T H
T A P L E-
Joe &
81.
Goodfreind
Wsshburn.Villag
548.
548.84
B-1
100%
6,141.52
1 1918.72
767.49
1008•
756.59
7,665.60
-0-.
7,665.60
Washburn
82.
Joe Roscoe
Meadows J2
1,
7
100.0
100.00
B-1
100%
1,u9.00
272.00
108.80
3D9.2f
231.95
1,459.75 .
-0-
1,459.75
83.
A.B. McCaughan
Unplatted
.0
200.00
'�t-1
100%
1,176.00
680.00
272.0C
312.5
234.39
1,682.39
-0-
1,682.39
•
84.
A.F.& A.M. Lodge +18S
Washburn
Meadows #2
2
4
100,0
100.00
R -1
100%
588.00
280.00
1 112.
302.5
226.89
926.89
-0-
926.89
8e
Parkdale Bart. Ch.
"
2
13
1100.0
100,00
R -1
1
588.00
-00
12
228. Lle
171-20
882.40
-0-
982.40
86.
Morris E. White
" "
2
2
00.0
100.00
R -1
100%
588.00
356.00
i42.4c
i2o.X
go.20
820.60
-0-
820.60
87.
Dewitt T. Hardy
"
2
1
100.0,
100.00
R -1
100%
588:00
328.00.
131.
183•
137.45
856.65
-0-
856.65.
88.1
Beatrdee L. Page
Sherwood Park
Unit No. 1''.
1
1
120.0
120.00
R -1
423.36
500.00
120.0
-0-
-0-
543.36
-0-
543.36
R O B
I N H 0 0
D R I V
89,
Roy E. Bryon
Sherwood Park
5
1
120.0
120.00
R -1
60%
423.36
500.00
120•
-0-
-0-
543.36
-0-
543.36
C.A. Peyton &
m 5
90.
T. M. Bel
8hervood,
,;.:
130
130.00
R -1
100%
764.40
480.00
192.
111.
83.45
1,C39.85
-0-
1,039.85
91;
Weber oa
Baptist Church
Paisley Subd, U
platt
24o
240.00
R -1
100%
1,411.20
824.00
329-6c
468.5
351.39
2,092.19
-0-
2,092.19
Harold Stagg
" "
5
8
140
140.00
R-1
60%
493.93
560.00
134•
-o-
10-
628:32
10-
628:32
R
1) W00
L DRI'V
IV
4
4
- Sheet No. 9
FINAL' STREET IMP omw ASSESSM=
SOUTH EAST SIDE WEBER ROAD SOUTH STAPLES ST. TO IMCUMON BOULET-aRD
TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT: Hot Mix ,Asphaltic Concrete Pavement, Curb and Gutter, SOUTH TEXAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CONTRACTOR
Sidewalks, Driveways sa orm ewers ace o ace o s ROADWAY
Zoned R -1 or R -2 Assessment for Curb and Gutter and. Pavement Per n. ...... 5.B8
CONTRACT DATE: cember 14 1960
_ De Zoned other than R -1 or R-2 Assessment for Curb and Gutter & Pavement Per.Lin.FL
:
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot ........ ...............................
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Sqvare Foot . ....................,.......... $ 0.75
JENGTH
LIN. FT.
PERCENT
ASSESSMENT
PROPERTY OWNER
NAME OF ADDITI
BLK.
LOT
ABUT
OF IM-
TYPE OF
OF ASSESS
CURB &- GUT
SIDEWALK
SU.BLK
DRIVE-
DRIVEWAY
TOT. ASSESS
TOTAL
PROP.
PROVXMENT
ZONING
CHARGEABLP
TER & PVC.
Sh_ FT.
A$&ESS-
WAY
ASSESS-
MENT BEFORE
ASSESSMEBT
ADJUSTED
MENT
Sb.FT.
MENT
ADJUSTMENT
ADJUSTMENT
ASSESSMENT
Sherwood Park
93
loe B. Burkhalter
Unit I
6
I
140.0
140.00
R - 1
60%
493.92
560.00
134.40
-o-
-o-
6,'8.32
-0-
628.32
Sherwood Park
94
Newton T. Clark
Unit 2
7
1
130.0
130.00
R - 1
60%
458.64
520.00
L24.80
-0-
-0=
583.44
-0-
583.44
L I
T T L E
J O H N
D R I
E
Sherwood ark
95
ne K. Coppin
Unit 2
8
1
140.0
140.00
R - 1
60%
493.92
560.00
134.80
-0-
-0-
628.32
-0-
628.12
Sherwood Park
96
William E. Ledford
Unit 2
8
20
125.0
125.00
R - 1
60%
441.00
500.00
120.00
-0-
-0-
561.00
-0-
561.00
L I
D E N
3 T R E E T
Sherwood Park
97
lovard D. Larkins
Unit 2
11
1
125.0
125.00
R - 1
60%
441.00
500.00
120.00
-0-
-0,
561-00
-0-
561--00
ommercial
Sherwood Park
ssors Corp.
Unit # 3
3
102.5
102.50
B - 1
100%
1,146.98
14P.Oo
56.8o
645.52
484.14
1„687.92
-0-
1,687.92
herwo ar
R & R.C.Snapka
Unit # 3
3
102.5
102.50
B - 1
10o%
1,146.98
130.00
,52.00
673.52
505.14
1,704.12
-0-
1,704.12
urner Oil Co.
Sherwood Park
00
Jack Miller
Unit # 3
3
125.0
125.00
B - 1
100%
1,398.75
220.00
88.00
673.5
505.14
1,991.89
-0-
1,991.89
`
G 0 L L
I H A R
R 0 A D
'Rage pq: 30
F714AL`' STREET IM� P1' ASS
SOVZLJI?A ' SE1H5 HEBER ROAD SOUTH 82APLkS ST,. TO J EMETON BOULEVARD.
E OF WROVEMENT: Hat -mix Asphaltic,_Concsete ftyement, Curb S(WTH TEXAS CON$=CTIOIT CORAOTDR
and Gutter, Sidewalks Dr1jm va and St=m_,jgW t_ Face to Face of Curbs R i�Dli
Zoned R -1 or R -2 Assessment for Curb and Gutter and Pavement Per Lin. Ft. 5�
COp�nnmu. December 14. lA6o Zoned Other than R -1 or R -2 Assessment for Curb and Gutter & Pavement. Per Lin. Ft.'
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot . . . . . . . . . . Q
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Foot. . . . . . . . . . 0.75
LERM LIN. FT. PERCENT ASSESSMM 31DEWALK DRIVE- DRIVENAY TOT. ASSESS. T4'PAL_
PROPERTY OWNER NAME OF ADDITION BLK LOT ABUT. OF IM- TYPE OF F ASSESS CURB & GUT SIDEWALK A9MS- WAY ASSESS- 00 BEFORE ASSM%M AANSM
PROP. PROVEMENT ZONTNO MARGRABL1 TER & PVT. SQ. FT. MOT SQ, FT. MUST AWUSTME'NT ADJUSTMENT AMSSHM
G O L L I H A E R O A D
Ballard Addn. Zoned R-1
104 Houston Natl. Gas Unit No. 1 1 59.75 59.75 Used as Bus 1014 668.60 238.88 9.5-551. -0- -0- 764.15 -0- 764.15
Id Fares P. Wade &
lo- W. S. Perking " " 1 1 A .62 .62 B-1 1 1 •42 .00 146.40 2 2T4.89 1,513-71 -0- 1 1
A 29.87'
IOA Grady St. Clair " " 1 B 127. ..157-375 B-1 W"' 1,761-03 573• 229.40 127.26 95.45 2,085-88 -d- 2,085.88
1-o4 C.D. Davie Jr. Weber Place 1 1 138.8 135.87 R -1 71.84% 573.94 427.481 122.85 -0- -0- 6 • -o- 6
s ,
B A R N E S S R E E
10 Carl Hutchinson Weber Place 2 1 135. 135.88 R «1 71.65% 5'72.4 427,5 122.38 -C- -0-
X
106 Edwin E. Conner Hoffman T•. Poiti n Used "
of 10 sec J 388.75 A-2 100% 4,350.11 1275. 59 .i4 5 .S.P,*
10 Nicholson Dev. Co. NanJean Park z 1 77.27 77.27 R -1 80% 363.48 309.12 83.6o -o- 70- 447.o8
X'a A ',zF0R I DR I V
108 Nicholson Dev. Co. 1 .1 135. 135.44 8=71 67.0 533.66 542.88 141.65 -0 -0- 675-31 '0' 675--3l'
VFlie . Kennedy Lincoln Terr.
Subdivision 3 1 118. 118.00 R -1 70% 485.69 52.00 14.56 -o- -0. 500• ?5 109:3 391.22
s
L M 0 N T S T R E E
Messarra " " 2 1 118.0 118.00 R -1 70% 485.69 -0- -0- -0- -0- 485,69 1 •013 f.66 nfrey Jr. " 2 43 118.0 118.00 R -1 75% 520.38 -0- -0- _0_ _0_ 520:38 116.82 403.56'
Credit for Existing curb and Sutter ($1.32 per lin. ft. ) @ % noted.
ST. TO LEXIMTON SOULEMRD
3GM'H TMAS CONST'RU,—XION COMIPANY
ok: I ace to Face of Cu&,s
Aesesement, fr,-r7ur,- —anj G"ter a,,.d Pavement 7er Li-_, Ft
R-1 or R-2 Assessment for Cunb, and utter and Favement
kdeiwalk per q: re Fact-
? acrete Driveway per Square Foot. ......
3ESMIIM?T SIDEW-41K DRIVE- DILIVIEW.L1 TCT.ASSE-S!
& GMT- SIDE-WAI-K ASSESS- WAY ASSESS- MEUIT BEEFoi
& Pvt. SQ F-4. MMT
R C L E
-0- -0- -0-
-0- -0- -0-
T,
-0- -0- -0- 4
-0- -0- .0- -0-
-R C L
OF B&MMMMIT Hot-rix Asphaltic Concrete Psveman�, Culb
Sidewaiki, T, orr, Sewers
Zoned '11-1 or
CORM02 DkTE: DLeembpr 1,4. Zai�ed Other
Assessment f,
Assessment f
0
Tc:' . A di o5,
Ma--Jaan Fork
1
b5.! R- I l00% -0- -0- IK.26
go.-?r
.19
Robert L. Belu"sen
L N IC I,
PI M M
NAME 0-F ADDITION
BLA-UK LOT
�BT
or DA- 7T.'E OF OF ASSESS
Merie H. Patch
3 13
1-1.00
55.001 R-1 100% -0- -0- X3,2
NG
WITI, C&RGE04BLI
L. Knox
1
M 14, R1 0 w
55.00 R-1 100% -0- -0- 93.26
69-95
Lincoln Terrace
3,2
Mal K. Dunn
a-A vision
1 1
L 'i'S, 0
lip'. oo R-I 71%
13
Martin H. JcGnes
1
123-0
123.00 R-I 65%
LL-a-L-L
k
L 4'
W, Miller
2S
123,0
IL3. 00 -�-i 65%
t5
'Albert
Garland Bazeiore
1 27
L2w.0
P� ,
12 1 61 5
3=1
T E T R A C E
1
L6
Carl Steirumeyer
1 20
L23,0
121-001 - 65 %-
ST. TO LEXIMTON SOULEMRD
3GM'H TMAS CONST'RU,—XION COMIPANY
ok: I ace to Face of Cu&,s
Aesesement, fr,-r7ur,- —anj G"ter a,,.d Pavement 7er Li-_, Ft
R-1 or R-2 Assessment for Cunb, and utter and Favement
kdeiwalk per q: re Fact-
? acrete Driveway per Square Foot. ......
3ESMIIM?T SIDEW-41K DRIVE- DILIVIEW.L1 TCT.ASSE-S!
& GMT- SIDE-WAI-K ASSESS- WAY ASSESS- MEUIT BEEFoi
& Pvt. SQ F-4. MMT
R C L E
-0- -0- -0-
-0- -0- -0-
T,
-0- -0- -0- 4
-0- -0- .0- -0-
-R C L
M
M AL
IT
J iSTED
M C A R D L E R A D
Tc:' . A di o5,
Ma--Jaan Fork
1
b5.! R- I l00% -0- -0- IK.26
go.-?r
.19
Robert L. Belu"sen
55-00 R-, 100% -0- -0- 2G. 26
90.20
2
20
•
Merie H. Patch
3 13
1-1.00
55.001 R-1 100% -0- -0- X3,2
9.95
L. Knox
1
3 1
55.00 R-1 100% -0- -0- 93.26
69-95
M
M AL
IT
J iSTED
Zoned R-1 or iR -2 Assesment or Cara and Cutter and Pavement P Li
MCT DATE, }3ee€box 14, if Zo Other tir< Ft -1 r R-2 Assessment tr barb and Gutter Zi Pavme
hisses t for Sidewalk per Sq?xare Foot
Assessment, for Comerete Driveway per Square Foot
PROPERTY OWM
% OF Z S
BLX
LC7
'
P P.
Lit'. PERCENT ES
F IM- E' Off' OF ' S & WIT
I'vO 2G 13 & l'.
SIDEWALK
3 D AD. Ax Si-:
S . F T. 3i
DRi
WAY '
Q' FT,
iV Y T. A
ASSES-
S
M C k R D L E A 0 A D
122 Joc. E. Waagi r
rmnJean Park
1
11
55.00
5�. R-1 l
-0- -4-
1201.26r
90.P-0
123 John eTonere
u
10
5"5+0
5'h.W B-1 100% J
-0- -Q.,
1.24.'26'
90.20
125
"
1
8
55,0
55.0
5,0 x_1
55.407 TR -1 10
-e- _0_
®G_ -o-
26
:P6
69.95
r-
.126
121 Jade M. Watkim, J;^.
i
7
J ?.
55X
57 -04 R-I 1
55.44 IR_1 100%
-0- -0-
-G- -Ca-
12 .26
2zi.26
96 95 C.
883-45
128 T. E. Nicholson
� �
55: � -� �
-0- -G-
1, .26
90.20 1
12 We
55.0
15.E R-1 1
®0_ _4-
120,26
90.20
130 Va. B & Kennon J.War
1
3
55.4
55.07 11-1 100%
-w° ,.p-
93.2E
6M5 yS.
131 John. W. Che—ee
1
2
55.4
55.00 iR -3 104
-C}- -4-
120.2
94• ?_4
132 Jack W, Sykes
65. ?3
23 � 3 liN �
p_ _G..
-0-
_p®
Crecic for F : ;tfng Curb and Gutter & Driveway
4
00W s..r
Sheet No. 13
FINAL . STREET IIME"ROVERENf'A38EBMW
SOUTH EAST .SIDE WEBER ROAD SOUTH STAPLES Sr. TO LEXINGTON BOULEVARD
OF IMPROVEMENT: Hot -nix Asphaltic Concrete Pavement, Curb SOUTH TEXAS CONSTRUCTION C.W -ANY CONTRACTOR
ea orm_ Severs ace o ace o curbs —ROADWAY
and utter, ideva s, Driveways")
Zoned R -1 or R -2 Assessment for Curb and Gutter and Pavement Per Lin. S•�
COKMACT DATE: December 14, 1960 7oned Other than R -1 or R -2 Assessment for Curb and Gutter and Pavement Per 14 11-19
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot ................................... . 0.40
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Fu ot ...... ................... ......�
PROPERTY OWNER
LAM OF ADDITION
BLOCI
LOT
LIN.FT.
OF IM-
IROVEMENT
TYPE OF
ZONING
PERCENT.
OF wSSESS
HARGEAB
ASSL''S
CURB & OUT
TER & PVT.
SIDEWALK
S (4-FT.
SIDEWALK
ASSESS-
MINT
DRIVE-
.lAY
Sk. FT.
DRIVEW:kY
ASSESS-
MENT
TOT. ASSESS
MENT BEFORE
ADJUSTMENT
ASSESSMENT
ADJUSTMENT
TOTL3.
ADJUSTED.
LSSESSMENT
ABUT.
PROP.
D E I
P H I N
D R I P
133
Geo. J. Merriman
Byron Willis
Subd. Portion
.W:'
21
1
240.3
240.31
B -1
100%
2,689.07
821.24
328.50
336.26
252.20
3,269.77
-G-
3,269.77
L E X 3
N G T 0
B L V D.
•
3,2069-77
• �• 7 ��' ii/Iil�lfi6iil'i2��: __�_ ®_ ®��
-Sheift= No. 14
-
FINAL - " STRf .T IMFROV&IM ASSESSMFDT
GOLLIAA3
ROAD FROM 120' SOUTHE45T TO L-10' NO�TSWLSP 2F rr hR =OAD
E 40F IMPROV 01 ': Hot -mix Asphaltic Concrete Pavement, Curb
SOUTH WMkS CONSTRUCTION COWANY
CONTRX 2OR
and Cuttera, •;wa _:3 xna IVIveways
Faae to ace of ur 3 -- R03DlcPY
"av;.,tent 5.88
COPpTRA
T PATE: December 14, 1y60
Zoned R -1 or R -2 k,3 ;,e i 3-ient for Curb -:vl Gutt? , xi i Per Lin- t .
Zoned Other than R -1 or R -2 Assessment for Curb and Gutter & Pavement Per
;,.7"$
Lin Ft.. 11.19
Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot .......... ...............................
0. 0
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Fc,ot ............... .......
..... .$77
M°
TH
LI1V. FT.'
PERCENT
ASGESSWW
SIDEWt1IdC
DdIVE-
DRIVEWAY
TOT. ASSES
TClPAi.
PROPERTY OWiU R
OF ADDITION
LOCK
LOT
ABUT.
OF D4-
"
TYPE. OF
OF ASSES
CURB & GUT
SIDEW
ASSESS-
WAY
AISEESS-
MENT -BEF
ASSESSIdFiriT
ADJT=AMT
ADJUSTED
ASSESSMENT
OP.
WVEMENT
ZONING
CHARGEABIX
TER &.PVT
SO_ FT.
MENT
SQ. FT.
MEND
ADJUSTMENT.
N 0 R T
H EAST f
I DE OF
G 0 L L
I H A R R
D.
134
Turner oil Co.
Sherwood Park 3
3
F
1 61
B - 1
JQO%
682.59
76
3G.40
336.26
252.20 '
965.19
0.06
965.19.
W El
ER
O A D
135
iaiGy 8'6tors, Inc.
Parkside Addn.
Re lst Blk.6,Lti
6
B
61"
B - 1
l00%
682.59
76
30.4o
336.26
25220,
965.19
ov 00_
965.19'
w
Tlt-ust-
S0UT•HWES'T
I D E OF
G'bLL
'HAR R
D.
Ballard Addn.
Used as
1Wt -_9M Corp-
Unit I
1
61
Business
loo�
682.j9
244
y7-6o
-0-
0.00
780.19
0,00
'80.19"
• �• 7 ��' ii/Iil�lfi6iil'i2��: __�_ ®_ ®��
SECTION 4. HE IT FURMER ORDBIM That in the event the actual frontage
of any property herein assessed shall be found upon the completion of Said
improvements to be greater or less than the number of feet hereinabove stated, the
assessments herein set against any such property and against the real and true
owner or owners thereof shall be, and the same are hereby declared to be increased
or decreased as the case may be, in the proportion which said excess or deficiency
of abutting property shall bear to the whole number of front feet of property
actually improved in accordance with the front foot rate of assessment herein
adopted, it being the intention that each parcel of property and the real and tree
owner or owners thereof abutting on the portion of Weber Road and Gollihar Road,
within the limits above defined, shall pay for said improvements under the "FAIT
FOOT RM- OR PLM", which rule or plan is hereby found and determined to be Just
and equitable and to produce a substantial equality, having in view of the special
benefits to be received and the burdens imposed thereby= and it is further ordained
that upon final completion and acceptance of said improvements on said portion of
Weber Road and Oollihar Road, all certificates hereinafter provided for, issued.to
evidence said assessments against said parcels of property abutting upon said
streets, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, shall be issued in accord-
ance with, and shall evidence the actual footage of said abutting property and
the actual cost of said improvements, the amount named in said certificate in no
case to exceed the amount herein assessed against such property unless such increase
be caused by an excess of footage over the amount hereinabove stated, such actual
cost and such actual number of feet of abutting property, if different from the
bereinabove shown in Section 3 hereof, to be determined by the Director of Public
Works upon completion of said work on said streets, and the findings of said
Director of Public Works shall be final and binding upon all parties concerned.
SECTION S. That the several sums mentioned above in Section 3 hereof
assessed against said parcels of property abutting on the portion of Weber Road
and Gollibar Road, within the limits defined, and the real and true owners there-
of, whether named or correctly named herein or not, subject to the provisions of
Section 4 hereof, together with interest thereon at the rate of five per cent
—7—
(6%) per annum with reasonable attorneyrs fee and all costs and expenses of
collection, if incurred, are hereby declared to be made a first and prior lien
upon the respective parcels of property, against which same arc assessed from
and after the date said improvements were ordered by said City Council, to —wit:
January 11, 1981, and a personal liability and charge against the real and true
owner or owners thereof, whether or not such owner or owners be named or correctly
named herein, and that said lien shall be and constitute the first and prior
enforceable claim against the property assessed and shall be a first and paramount
lien superior to all other liens, claims or title, except for lawful ad valorem
taxes, and that the same so assessed shall be payable as follows, to -wit: in five
(B) equal annual installments, the first of which will be payable on or before
twenty (20) days after the completion of said improvements in the streets upon
which the respective property abuts, and acceptance thereof by the said City Council,
the four (4) remaining installments to be due and payable, respectively, one (1),
two (2), three (3) and four (4) years from and after said date of acceptance,
deferred payments to bear interest from said date of acceptance at the rate of five
per cent (5%) per annum, payable annually concurrently with each of said installments;
past due installments of principal and interest to bear interest at the same rate
per annum until paid; provided, nowever, that any owner of such property shall have
the right to pay off the entire amount of each assessment, or any installment thereof,
before maturity, by paying principal and accrued interest to date of said payment;
and provided, further, that if default shall be ma" in the,paymeut of any installment
of principal or interest when due, then the entire amount of said assessment upon
which such default is made, shall, at the option of South Texas Construction Co.,
their successors or assigns, be, and become immediately due and payable and shall
be collectible together with reasonable attorneys fees and all costs and expenses
of collection, if incurred.
SWTION 0. That the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, shall not in any manner
be liable for the payment of any sums hereby validly assessed against any abutting
property, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, but South Texas Construction
-8—
Co. shall look solely to such property and the real and true owner or owners
thereof for the payment of the sums validly assessed against said respective
parcels of property, but said City shall be obligated to furnish South Texas
Construction Co, valid assessments and asseesment certificates and shall exercise
all of its lawful powers and aid in the enforcement and collection of said liens
and assessments; and if default shall be made in the payment of any of said sums
herein assessed against the said parcels of property, and the real and true
owner or owners thereof, collection thereof shall be enforced at the option of
South Texas Construction Co., their successors or assigns, either by snit in any
Court having jurisdiction or by sale of the property assessed as nearly as
possible in the manner as may be provided by law and Charter in force in said City
for the sale of property for the collection of ad valorem taxes.
SWTION 7, That for the purpose of evidencing said assessments, the liens
securing same and the several sums assessed against the said parcels of property
and the real and true owner or owners thereof, and the time and terms of payment,
and to aid in the enforcement thereof, assignable certificates shall be issued by
the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, to South Texas Construction Co. upon the
completion of said improvements in said streets and acceptance thereof by said
City Council, which certificates shall be executed by the mayor in the name of
the City, attested by the City Secretary with the corporate seal of said City,
and which certificates shall declare the amounts of said assessments and the times
and terms thereof, the rate of interest thereof, the date of the completion and
acceptance of the improvements for which the certificate is issued, and shall contain
the names of the apparent true owner or owners as accurately as possible, and the
description of the property assessed by lot and block number, or number of abutting
feet, or such other description as may otherwise identify the same, and if the said
property shall be owned by an estate or firm, then to so state the fact shall be
sufficient and no error or mistake in describing such property or in giving the
name of any owner or owners, or otherwise, shall in anywise invalidate or impair
the assessment levied hereby or the certificate issued in evidence thereof.
That the said certificate shall further provide substantially that if default
shall be made in the payment of any installment of principal or interest when due,
—9—
then, at the option of South Texas Construction Co., their successors or assigns,
pr the holder thereof, the whole of said assessment evidenced thereby shall at
once become due and payable, and shall be collectible with reasonable attorneyes
fees and all expenses and costs of collection, if incurred, and said certificate
shall set forth and evidence the personal liability of the real and true owners
or owner of such property, whether named or correctly named therein or not, and
the lien upon such property, and that said lien is first and paramount thereon,
superior to all other liens, titles and charges, except for lawful ad valorem
taxes, from and after the date said improvements were ordered by said City Council,
to -wits January 11, 1881, and shall provide in effect that if default shall be made
in the payment thereof, the same may be enforced, at the option of South Texas
Construction Co., or their successors and assigns, by the sale of the property
therein described in the manner provided for the collection of ad valorem taxes as
above recited, or by suit in any Court having jurisdiction.
That said certificates shall further recite in effect that all the proceedings
with reference to making said improvements have been regularly had in compliance with
the law and Charter in force in said City and the proceedings of said City Council
of said City, and that all prerequisites to the fixing of the assessment lien
against the property therein described, or attempted to be described, and the personal
liability of the real and tree owner or owners thereof, evidenced by such certificates,
have been regularly done and performed, which recitals shall be evidence of all the
matters and facts so recited and no further proof thereof shall be required in any
Court.
That said certificates shall farther provide in effect that the City of
Corpus Christi, Texas, shall exercise all of its lawful powers, when requested so to
do by the holder of said certificates, to aid in the enforcement and collection
thereof, and said certificates may contain other and farther recitals pertinent
and appropriate thereby. It shall not be necessary that said certificates shall be
in the exact form as above set forth, but the substance and effect thereof shall
suffice.
-10-
SECTION S. That all such assessments levied are a personal liability and
charge against the real and true owner or owners of the property described, or
attempted to be described, notwithstandiAg such owner or owners may not be named
or correctly, named, and any irregularity in the name of the property owner, or
the description of any property or the amount of any assessment, or in any other
matter or thing shall not in anywise invalidate or impair any assessment levied
hereby or any certificate issued, and such mistake, or error, invalidity or
irregularity whether in such assessment or in the certificate issued in evidence
thereof, may be, but is not required to be, to be enforceable, corrected at any
time by the said City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. Further that
the omission of said improvements in front of any part or parcel of property abutting
upon that portion of Weber Road and Oollihar Road, which is exempt from the lien
of said assessment, shall in no wise effect or impair the validity of asses—onto
against the other parcels of property abutting upon said streetal and that the
total amounts assessed against the respective parcels of property abutting upon
said streets, within the limits herein defined, and the real and true owner or
owners thereof, are the same as, or less than, the estimate of said assessment
prepared by the Director of Public Works and approved and adopted by said City
Conseil and are in accordance with the proceedings of said City Council relative
to said improvements and assessments therefor, and with the terms, powers and
provisions of said Charter 108 of the Acts of the First -Called Session of the 40th
Legislature of the State of Texas, known as Article 1108 -b of Vernon's Annotated
Civil Statutes of Texas and the Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, under
which terns, powers and provisions said proceedings, said improvements and assess-
ments were had and made by said City Council.
SECTION 9. The fact that Weber Road and dollihar Road have became important
thoroughfares and the fact that the present condition of said streets, within the
limits herein defined, is dangerous to the health and public welfare of the
inhabitants of the City of Corpus Christi, due to the conditions and increase of
traffic along said portions of said streets creates a public emergency and an
-11-
•
imperative public necessity, requiring the suspension of the Charter rule that no
ordinance or resolution shall be passed finally on the date of its introduction,
and that said ordinance shall be read at three (3) several meetings of the City
Council, and the Mayor having declared that each emergency and imperative public
necessity exists, and having requested that said Charter rule be suspended, and
that this ordinance be passed finally on the date of its introduction, and that this
ordinance take effect and be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
it is so ordained.
PASSED AM APPROVED this the 22nd day of February, A. D., 1081.
ATrE.9Tz !Nju
r
City tecret y
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMz
City Attorney
�
City of Corpus Christi, Texas
—12—
s �
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
(n DAY OF
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE OF THE FORE-
GOING ORDINANCES A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND IMPERATIVE NECESSITY EXIST FOR THE
SUSPENSION OF THE CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT THAT NO ORDINANCE OR RESOLU-
TION SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED, AND THAT SUCH
ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL,
1, THEREFOREy HEREBY REQUEST THAT YOU SUSPEND SAID CHARTER RULE OR REQUIRE-
MENT AND PASS THIS ORDINANCE FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED, OR AT THE
PRESENT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
REEOPPCTFULLYy
MAYOR�o
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
THE CHARTER RULE WAS SUSPENDED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
ELLROY KING
JAMES L. BARNARD
MRS. RAY AIRHEART
JOSEPH B. DUNN
PATRICK J. DUNNE CC
R. A. HUMBLE
GABE LOZANO, SR.
THE ABOV� ORDINANCE WAS PASSED BY THE FOLLOV NG VOTE:
ELLROY KING
JAMES L. BARNARD
MRS. RAY AIRHEART
JOSEPH B. DUNN CU
PATRICK J. DUNNE
R. A. HUMBLE
GABE LOZANO, SR.