HomeMy WebLinkAbout06335 ORD - 11/15/1961AN ORDINANCE
CLOSING THE HEARING GIVEN TO THE REPS. AND TRUE OWNERS OF
PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON GREENWOOD DRIVE FROM THE WESTERLY
BOUNDARY LINE OF PORT AVENUE TO THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY
LINE OF HORNE ROAD AS TO SPECIAL BENEFITS TO ACCRUE TO SAID
PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF BY VIRTUE OF
THE IMPROVEMENT OF SAID STREET WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, AND
AS TO ANY ERRORS, AND INVALIDITIES OR IRREGULARITIES IN ANY
OF THE PROCEEDINGS OR CONTRACT THEREOF, OVERRULING AND DENYING
ALL PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS OFFERED, EXCEPT THE CHANGES
REFLECTED HEREIN, FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE PROPERTY
ABUTTING UPON SAID STREET, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, WILL BE
SPECIALLY BENEFTTIED AND ENHANCED IN VALUE IN EXCESS OF THE
AMOUNT OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO BE AND AS
HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST SAID PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON A PORTION
OF GREENWOOD DRIVE, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, AND LEVYING AN
ASSESSMENT FOR THE PAYMENT OF A PORTION OF THE COST OF IMPROVE
MENTS ON SAID STREET, WITHIN SAID LIMITS, FIXING A CHARGE AND
LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREET AND THE REAL AND
TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE
CERTIFICATES UPON THE COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SAID WORK, THE
MANNER AND TIME OF PAYMENT AND PROVIDING THE MANNER AND METHOD OF
COLLECTION OF SAID ASSESSMENTS AND CERTIFICATES; AMID DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY,
WHEREAS, The City Council of Corpus Christi, Texas, by duly enacted
ordinance passed and approved on October 25, 1961, determined the necessity for,
and ordered the improvement of a portion of Greenwood Drive, within the limits
hereinafter defined, in the manner and according to the plans and specifications
heretofore approved and adopted by the City Council by ordinance dated October
26, 1961, said portion of said street to be improved being as follows, to -wit;
Greenwood Drive from the Westerly boundary line of Port Avenue to
the Northeasterly boundary line of Horne Road;
a duly executed notice of said ordinance having been filed in the name of said
City with the County Clerk of Nueces County, Texas; and,
WHEREAS, said City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, after
having advertised for and received bids on the construction of said improve-
ments for the length of time and in the manner and form as required by the
Charter of said City and the laws of the State of Texas, and after having duly
and regularly made appropriation of funds available for such purpose to cover
the estimated cost of said improvements to said City, all as provided by the
Corpus Christi City Charter and by law, did award a contract foh the
construction of said improvements to Heldenfels Brothers on their lowest and
most advantageous bid and said contract has been heretofore duly executed by
• a t i
said City of Corpus Christi and Heldenfels Brothers and is dated October
11, 1981, and the performance bond required by said contract has been
properly furnished by said Heldenfels Brothers, and accepted by said City
Council of said City as to form and amount as required by the Charter of said
City and the laws of the State of Texas, and,
WHEREAS, the said City Council has caused the Director of Public Works
to prepare and file estimates of the cost of such improvements and estimates
of the amount per front foot proposed to be assessed against the property
abutting upon a portion of Greenwood Drive, within the limits herein defined,
to be improved, and the real and true owners thereof, and said Director of
Public Works has heretofore filed said estimates and a statement of other
matters relating thereto with said City Council, and salsa has been received,
examined and approved by said City Council; and,
WHEREAS, said City Council, by duly enacted ordinance dated October
289 19819 did determine the necessity of levying an assessment for that
portion of the cost of constructing said improvements on a portion of Greenwood
Drive, within the limits herein defined, to be paid by the abutting property and
the real and true owners thereof, and did order and set a hearing to be held
at 3=00 o *clock P.M. on November 8, 1981, in the Council Chamber of the City
Hall of Corpus Christi, Texas, for the real and true owners of the property
abutting upon said street, within the limits above defined, and for all others
owning or claiming any interest in, or otherwise interested in said property,
or any of said matters as to the assessments and amounts to be assessed against
each parcel of abutting property and the real and true owner or owners thereof,
and as to the special benefits to accrue to said abutting property by virtue
of said improvements, if any, or concerning any error, invalidity, irregularity
or deficiency in any proceedings, ok contract, to appear and be beard in person
or by counsel and offer evidence in reference to said matters; and said City
Council did by said ordinance order and direct the City Secretary to give
notice of said hearing to the real and true owners of the property abutting upon
said street, within the limits defined, by publication in the Corpus Christi
—2—
Times, the official newspaper of the City of Corpus Christi, a newspaper
published in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, of general circulation, said
notice to be published in said newspaper at least three (3) times prior to
the date of said hearing, the first publication of which to be at least ten
(10) days prior thereto, all as provided for in accordance with the provisions
of said City Charter and of Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First Called
Session of the 40th Legislature of the State of Texas, known and shown as
Article 1106 -b of Vernon *s Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas; and
WHEREAS, said City Council did further order and direct said City
Secretary, in addition to said published notice as aforesaid, which was
provided to be valid and sufficient in itself, to mail to the apparent owners
of said abutting property a statement of the assessment for sidewalk per square
foot, the assessment for driveways per square foot, the assessment for paving,
curb and gutter per lineal foot for property zoned R 1 and R 2, the assessment
for paving, curb and gutter per lineal foot for property zoned or used for
other than R l and R 2 and the total cost of improvements on Greenwood Drive,
within the limits herein defined; and,
WHEREAS, said notice as ordered and directed by said City Council and
as required by said Acts and Charter of said City as above identified, was
duly given publication of same in the Corpus Christi Times, a newspaper
published in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, on October 27, 1861, November
3, 19612 and November 6, 19619 said notice so published being directed to the
owners of property abutting upon Greenwood Drive from the Westerly boundary line
of Port Avenue to the Northeasterly boundary line of Horne Road; and
WHEREAS, after due, regular and proper notice thereof, all as provided
by law and the Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, said hearing, of which
notice was given, was opened and held on November 8, 1961, in the Council
Chamber of the City Hall in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, in accordance
with said ordinance and notice, at which time an opportunity was given to all
said above mentioned persons, firms, corporations and estates, their agents
I
�.l
i
i
and attorneys, to be heard and to offer evidence as to all matters in
accordance with said ordinance and notice, at which time the following
appeared and offered the following testimony=
-4-
Regular Council Meeting
November 8, 1961
Page 411
After a brief recess, Mayor McDonald reconvened the meeting and announced the
Council would hold the Public Hearing scheduled for 3 o'clock, p.m., on the proposed
Greenwood Drive Improvement Assessments.
City Attorney Singer explained that the Greenwood Drive Improvements covered
the area from Port Avenue to Horne Road and that the assessments were against 176
parcels of property abutting the proposed improvements, including property owned by
the City and by the School District.
City Engineer Obie Etheridge presented the plane for the improvement of Green-
wood Drive from Port Avenue to Horne Road, and the preliminary assessment ro11;
explained the nature, extent and specifications of the proposed improvemente; tte
cost of construction; the amount of coat to be borne by the City, which includes all
coat of the improvements abutting the footage owned by the City on this strest; i.e.,
City incinerator, airport property and fire station located at the intersection of
Horne Road and Greenwood Drive, all cost of storm sewers, and cost of adjustments
of utilities and traffic controls; and the amount, before adjustment, to be assessed
against the abutting property owners; the manner in which such pro rata share was
computed; and the various methods of payment which a property owner may elect is
use for satisfying his assessment.
Harold Carr testified as to his background experience which he felCqualified
him as a real estate appraiser for both business and residential properties'in Ehis
City; testified that he had personally viewed and understood the extent and'®pecifi-
cations of the proposed improvements; that he had personally viewed within ifie past
week the assessment roll and each of the properties to be assessed; and EbaE•in hia
opinion, each of the properties so assessed would be enhanced in value at least to
the extent of the proposed assessment, with no exceptions, and related some ofyihe
elements considered in forming his opinion.
City Attorney Singer called the name in order of each property owner on -the
assessment roll, giving each property owner or his agent an opportunity io be -heard
by the Council.
The following property owners were present but had no questions:
Item 43, Cornelia Lugo
Item ", Manuel Perez
Item 71, Lester Hunter
There being no further testimony offered or any further parties
appearing to be heard, upon proper motion, duly seconded and unanimously
Regular Council Meeting - -
November 8, 1961
Page 412
item 72, Ola V. Whitley
Item 81, Hector %anez
Item 84, Simon Capetillo
Item 109, Wesley Bammonds, represented by Ruth Boling
Item 111, Dario Delgado
Item 112, Antonio & Mario Morales
The following property owners, or their agents, appeared to speak
with reference to their particular piece of abutting property:
Item 55, Frank Greer, asked about the width of his driveway and if he
could have an 8' driveway; Mr. Etheridge answered he did not recommend less than
a 10' driveway where there was room and explained that this would be less expensive
for him than to later have to enlarge the driveway.
Item 57, Ruzel Tyler, corrected the name on the assessment roll, and
asked about monthly payments for a 441 frontage assessment.
Item 48, Agather Clark, requested a driveway.
Item 829 Jose A. Garza, asked about payments on less than 44' frontage,
and about his driveway.
Item 98, Richard Valdez, asked if there was going to be a refiguring
of his assessment since the City was taking 10' from him; it was explained that
he would be compensated for paved road or unpaved road in the payment made for the
10'.
Attoisney Edward de Ases, representing a number of Greenwood Drive prop -
lertyg-owners, including Richard Valdez, asked numerous questions that had bean
asked'of him as to methpd of determining business or residential zoning fns the
„purposes of assessment; methods of payment for 44' lots as compared to 50' lots; how
'An owner can add or eliminate a driveway; why the original curb & gutter'program
was abandoned; how much property the City itself owns; and the procedure in event
an owner does not want the improvements, and refuses to pay the assessment.
Item 102, Salvador Gonzales, requested his driveway be eliminated.
Item 115, Abelino Cantu, questioned the City's right to keep the drain-
age pipe he had recently installed; he was advised that it an owner is present
when the contractor removes the pipe and will move it off the street himself, he
will be allowed to keep it.
Item 174, Henry Trujillo, asked how_ it was decided which side of the
street to take the additional width from; this was explained.
Mrs. Rose Gonzales asked questions as to the use of bond money which
had been voted for this particular street, and whether or not the City was going
to install street lights after the improvement; the amount of bond money to be used
was explained and she was advised that a dtreet lighting program is planned for
this street.
No one else desirin&_to be heard, it was announced that the Council
would consider any written evidehce or testimony or requests which were received
within the week before officially closing the hearing and adopting the final
assessment roll.
There being no further business to come before the Council, the meet-
ing was adjourned.
There being no further testimony offered or any further parties
appearing to be heard, upon proper motion, duly seconded and unanimously
carried, the said hearing was declared closed; and,
WHEREAS, no further parties appeasing and no further testimony being
offered as to the special benefits in relation to the enhanced value of said
abutting property as compared to cost of the improvements of said portion of
fff said street proposed to be assessed against said property, or as to any errors i '
invalidities or irregularities, in the proceedings or contract heretofore had
I
In reference to the improvements of said street; and,
WREREAS, said City Council has heard evidence as to the special benefits
and enhanced value to accrue to said abutting property, and the real and true
owner or owners thereof, as compared with the cost of making said improvements
I
on said street, within the limits above defined, and has heard all parties i
appearing and offering testimony, together with all protests and objections
relative to such matters and as to any errors, invalidities or irregularities
i
In any of the proceedings and contract for said improvements, and has given a
9
full and fair hearing to all parties making or desiring to make any such i
j
protest, objection, or offer testimony and has fully examined and considered all
evidence, matters, objections and protests offered and based upon said evidence,
testimony and statements, said City council finds that each and every parcel of
property abutting upon a portion of Greenwood Drive, within the limits to be
improved as herein defined, will be enhanced in value and specially benefited
I, by the construction of said improvements upon the said street upon which said
property abuts, in an amount in excess of the amount of the cost of said improve-
ments proposed to be, and as hereinbelow assessed against each and every said
parcel of abutting property, and the real and true owners thereof, and said
i
City Council did consider and correct all errors, invalidities or deficiencies
called to its attention and did find that all proceedings and contracts were
proper and in accordance with the Charter of said City and the laws of the
i
i
State of Texas, under which those proceedings were being had, and the proceed—
jugs of said City Council heretofore had with reference to each improvements, �
—5-
and in all respects to be valid and regular; and said City Council did further
find upon said evidence that the assessments bereinbelow made and the charges
hereby declared against said abutting property on said portion of Greenwood
Drive, within the limits above defined, and the real and true owner or owners
thereof, are just and equitable and did adopt the rule of apportionment set
forth below and the division of the cost of said improvements between said
abutting properties, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, as just and
equitable, and as producing substantial equality considering the benefits to
be received and the burdens imposed thereby, and that all objections and protests
should be overruled and denied=
NOW, TREREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI, TEXAS=
SECTION 1, That there being no further protest or testimony for or against
said improvements, said hearing granted to the real and true owners of abutting
property on said street, within the limits above defined, and to all persons,
firms, corporations and estates, owning or claiming same or any interest therein,
be, and the same is hereby closed and all protests and objections, whether
Specifically mentioned or not, shall be, and the same are hereby overruled and
denied.
SECTION 2. That said City Council hereby finds and determines upon the
evidence heard in reference to each and every parcel of property abutting upon
Greenwood Drive, within the limits defined, that the special benefits in the
enhanced value to accrue to said property and the real and true owner or owners
thereof, by virtue of the construction of said improvements to said portion of
said street upon which said property abuts, will be in excess of the amount of
the cost of said improvementszas proposed to be, and as herein assessed against
said abutting" property and the real and true owners thereof, and finds that the
apportionment of the cost of said improvements, and that all assessments herein —
below made are just and equitable and produce substantial equality considering
the benefits received and the burdens imposed thereby, and are in accordance
—8—
with the laws of the State of Texas, and the Charter provision of the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, and that the proceedings and contract heretofore
had with reference to said improvements are in all respects regular, proper
and valid, and that all prerequisites to the fixing of the assessment liens
against said abutting properties, as bereinabove described and the personal
liability of the real and true owner or owners thereof, whether named or
correctly named herein or not, have been in all things regularly had and
performed in compliance with the law, Charter provisions and proceedings of
the said City Council.
SECTION 3, That in pursuance of said ordinance, duly enacted by said
City Council, authorizing and ordering the improvements of Greenwood Drive,
within the limits hereinabove defined, and in pursuance of said proceedings
heretofore had and enacted by said City Council in reference to said Improve-
ments and by virtue of the powers vested in said City with respect to said
street improvements by the laws of the State of Texas and the Charter of said
City, with particular reference to Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First Called
Session of the 40th Legislature of the State of Texas, known and shown as
Article 1106 -b of Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas, as amended,
there shall be, and is hereby levied, assessed and taxed against the respective
parcels of property abutting upon said portion of said street, and against
the real and true owners thereof, whether such real and true owner or owners be
named or correctly named herein or not, the several sums of money hereinbelow
mentioned and itemized opposite the description of the respective parcels of
said property, the number of front feet of each and the several amounts assessed
again st same and the real and true owner or owners thereof, and names of the
apparent owners thereof, all as corrected and adjusted by said City Council,
being as follows, to -wits
-7 _'_ -- - -- -- - -- - - - -- -__
FINAL SM7FT "CEBOVF.ifR.1'JT ASSESSIMU
' WEST SIDE GREENWOOD DRIVE FROM PORT AVErRJE TO HORNE ROAD
Sheet Idol
Ft MENF'_ETA BRCIffiig_
TYPE OF 111PROVEMENT: Tnt -rni Acn)yltic• ('"on to Pavanate ASSESSMENTS RAMS 44' FACE Ti' FACE CURB
Curti enrl .u."er, A-i ew•,1ks. ttrivei.rav Zoned R -1 or R -2 - Curb, Gutter & Pavement Per L.F.
Zoned Other Than R -1 or R -2 - Curb, Gutter & Pavement Per L.F
CONTRACT DATE: 11 October 1961 Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot
Assessment for ConcrElte Driveway per Square Foot
CONTRA'MR
$_5% -
`�
0_2
$ 0.75
+ '•C'a't ;__ Z..__�, t6 o.ueraLce
LIN.FT,
PERCENT
ILSSESS11MUT
SIDEWALK
DRIVE-
MIVEWAY
w
TOTAL
'PROPERTY OWNER
NAME OF ADDITION
BLOCK
JLEKGTH
LOT
ABUT.
OF IM-
TYPE OF
2 ASSESS.
CURB & GUT
IMAU
ASSESS-
WAY
ASSESS-
TOTAL
AD MTEL
PROP. FROVEMENT
ZONING
MARGEABLE
TER & PVT.
SQ.FT.
MENT
'S(!.FT.
IE14T
ASSESSMENT
ASSESSIdE;IT
P
P T
A V E N U
E
1. Sr_,a & R.D. Countiss oLa
Gloria
F
9
>C.00
13.00
I -2
1C0
108.16 1
52.00
- -7.68
-0-
-U-
125.84
j
Heaton Coact. Corp. B"
F
i0
.8
7.8o
I -2
ivG
48
2�1.
-o-
Guzman
F
11
57.8
57.Jrj
I -2
100
480.
231.2C
8.61
-o-
_0_
4 'V_ =tor . & Anna L.
2
78.8
75
-2
1
-
0
- -
-
Y N A
S T R E
-y
1B. A. Rose
La Gloria
�I
H .8
ti .80
I -2
10CA
81 0
11.20
it
1`, -
ri
itv of Corl.as 'ur_ t'
"
C
0 546.`',.
54E.Ju
R -1
100
21,..42
18. C4
61-.36
7 =;7.r
4
'7 9Felix 1- Gutierrez
Lear•✓
+l
40.00
B -4
loc)%
112.80
161.00
X4.40
'4U.20
ji
J4nn C. Brooke IV
!"
8 &
85.o
85. oc
B -4
100'
707.20
*70-00
2-.80
12 .2
:,2.L0
892 .4 *
0
1
B A L D
F! I N
B 0 U L E
V A
Margarita ei,a
Center View
art
of D
41,.0
40.00
H -4
1CO�u
332.80
80.00
2 .20
�4 .1
1li.8
471.83
C Maria E. unnue_& A. &
D
lOB.8G
108.80
B -4
10C%
90 5. 22
155.20
52.77
539. 5
4
1.
Aariustin Loziaoria
C
108. &
1C.8.
-
100
61g.74
41g.ao
4
-o-
7R771
2.
Ton Lon -or _a
B
1.8 80
108.
-
4
h
4
-0-
- -
car Garza
A
217.60
21 .60
B -1
100%
1.81U.4
61o.4o
20
4g1.4
5
r,51
!
S 0_N
O R A
S T R E
f T
+ '•C'a't ;__ Z..__�, t6 o.ueraLce
AU
FLUAL UTIUM INERMUM-4 'ZFZSM-I
tIEST SIDE GFff3MWO0D MIVE FMII FOBTINRU-M TO ME ROAD
TV, R OF UTrOVEMM: - I t I --
Curl) and Gutter. Sidewalks. TIrlyeway
CO.-MJM DAM ll October 1161
S-met i-Jo. 2
MIL 00TRUS
RAMS 44 M= TO FACE GM
zoned R-1 or R;2 - Curb, Gutter T -eavem-imt Fer L.F. - - - - -
Zoamd Other TLim R-1 or R-2 - Curb, Gutter & Pavecaat Per L.F
Amassment for Sidewalk per Square Foot
AGsesament for Concrete Driveway per Square Foot . . . . . .
COLITRACMR
RQAD9AT
't 'i. 66
v.- 2
V Q .4 j
I 'I,--,--- �"e Fc-, 4x - - � _', TRII_ .
snrdAJZ
DRIVE-
DRIVIUAY
TOZA.L
FT�OPK',TY OWIM
IIA119 OF ADDITION
ELM
LM
�01F I�mq! TYPE
ASSESS.
CURB& OUT
SIERWAU
ASSESS-
WAY
AMRS-0-
TOTAL
ADJWTED
COW.
IZ TING
MM M
IT
& FVT.
".FT.
mm
66 -IT.
MUT
ASSEEMM"T
pZZ_ESZMm_IT
_
_O'N
S 0 R P
S T R F 18
T
r14.j Vanuei Rodriquez,
El Re,, 14
15 1
43.21
0.21 1
B-1
_L'34
359.51
172.841
58.77
-0- 1
415.28
�3.i At,to-aio Bn-rrera, et .L,
" IL
16 1
42. (�
42-79
B-1
Loot
356.01
171.16
58.1,
17
42-71
42.(9
R-1
100-
251.61
111.16
37.
381.80
Sii,e.tr, PrradE lo
4
j 18 1
42-791
42. jg
251.61
1(1.16
58.19
-0-
I�J Damasco, Salazar
4
1 1- r
42.7j
42.E L)
R-I
3 I)M'
251.61
1 12 -1. 16
41.87
102.20
76.65 1
�7(,. 1-1
(Paul Cox)
Grei:,or'a _Fs[-erg',zo
!4
2C.
42.7111
42.7,
1 3-1
100",
nna Bo,,,a,ie--n
21
42.7'
42.79
1 R -1
'00%
181.16
44.,, ,
9P.20
�t.I,artjn TeaL
42.78i
-,2 - 7
R-1
100%
251-54
127.12
4�.22
'45.2k-
71.40
_(,6.,6
!•Santos B. Ser,ia J
4
23
42.78
42. f8
R-I
100%
251-54
171.12
58.18
-0-
-0-
30,,. (2
2--j I anuel G. SeFura
4
24
42.8
42.78
R-
4
i--ig iP
4- - qc,
4
_:LLA-I'rImitI
0 Z%ata
4
25
42.78,
42.78
RL
1001�
l 251.54
1-i1. 12
44.,,8
88.20
66.
'4AP - 07
25•
Joe D. Browning
4
26
1 42.781
42-78
R-1-
100,,4
251-54
11 .12
39. 14
116.20
87-15
177*ei
26.
Alfredo G. Flores
4
27
1 42-781
42.78
R-1
100%
251.54
*52.12
17.72
116.201
67.15
356.41
27.
Julio C. Barrera
4
28
42.10
42.10
R-1
100%
247.55
168.40
57.26
-0-
Rn4.8ij
T_
E A
S L E I
S T R E
T
T�
I 'I,--,--- �"e Fc-, 4x - - � _', TRII_ .
'� - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - FINAL o'TaFEE IMPROVaIENT kSSKo 2,1M
l n ST SIDE GREMWOOD DRIVE FROM PORT AVFTiUE TO BORNE ROAD
RELDENFELS BROTHERS CONTRACTOR
('TYPE OF IMPROV$MENT: Hot -mix Asphaltic Concrete Pavement, ABSESSMENTS RATES 44' FACE TO FACE CURB ROADWAY
-Curb and Outter, Sidewalks, Driveway ,+ z n ..e o-+ Per T._F_ _ ---
aonza n -3, or n -c - -, .,. ... _ _ - 8.a2
Zoned Other Than R -1 or R -2 - Curb, Gutter & Pavement Per L.F.
$ 0 34
CONTRACT DATE: 11 October 1961 Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot . . . . . . . . . . .
0.75
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Fuot
C
LIN. FT.
CENT
SESMWT
SIDEWALK
DRIVE
DRIVEWAY
TOTAL
z
PROPERTY MM
NAME OF ADDITION
IM
ABUT.
OF IM-
TYPE
ASSESS.
R
CURB & GUT
TER &PVT.
ID
&i.FT.
ASSESS-
MENT
WAY
S.Z.FT.
ASSESS-
MENT
TOTAL
ASSMe4ENT
AD r
•SSESSt•IENT
H
IB
PROP.
OVEMENT
ZONINRGEA
fIffA
r28.;Raul
Ortiz
El Rey
/
5
45.29
45.29
B -1
1GCt%
76.81
x88.16
29 97
116.20
87.15
493.93
9
-mmun y az ement
11, ouse of Corpus ChristjL
6 1
40.00
40.00
R -1
100%
237.20
160.00
54.40
40.80
-0-
88.20
-0-
66.15
28; -.6ol,
ti
7
40.00
X0.00
R -1
100%
235.20
120.00
042.5;'
30.
Job Cano
" "
5
40.
40.00
R -1
10�p
20
120.00
40.80
88.20
66.15
342.15
31
Leonardo Lopez
32.
Monroe Horn " "
>
9
40.00
40.00
R -1
lOG�u
235.20
160.00
54.40
-0-
-0-
289.60
3.1tfArteo
Garcia
5
10
40.00
40.00
R -1
100f
23,.20
120.00
40.80
88.20
66.1
342_
t34.;
F. 0. Nieto
5
11
40.00
40.00
R -1
10�u
__ .2O
560.00
54.4E
-O-
-C-
e89.6 i
I3
Juan Lsrs
"
12
v0.0
40.00
R -1
100%
1i -;5.20
112.00
38.08
102.20
76 67
345•= +S
I
j6.l
s on erry
Jarrett 'webel
5
13
40.0
40.00
R -1
106
c 5.20
160.00
54.40
-0-
-G-
-' S '_'__
14
40.00
R -1
1GO%
e�,).20
160.00
54.40
-0-
-0-
289.00
U 7.
Pablo Reta, et al
1
3t.
Ramon Fernandez
'� "
1
40.00
R -1
lo at
2=5.20
120.00
40.80
88.20
66.1
42.1
39.5
saturnine vela
5
16
Li24.8q
40.00
R 1
100%
235.2c
116.00
39.44
95.2a
71.40
346.04
4o.
City of Corpus Christi
5
4.
R -1
100%
73 4.35
499.56
169.85
-0-
O-
904.20
D U
N B A R
S T R E
E T
�
1
FINAL 01 .XT ":Leet No.
6TST ME GRE NOWD DRIVE FFCA PORT AM "T- TO HOMM ROP?J m LS iViGTF2R8 CONTRACTOR
TY.FE OF IlG-R01CSi•=T Ror -,� en�r.� +a r,ne -nt,. �vr �,r� ASSE5SMENTIS RATES + 1r=E TO FACE CLTB ROAD MA
w�r]_fs'_` ±n�, R9Rn- .rRlt -n� Sh•i�-� Zi'�[�1 Qr - Curb, Guttex ,avem at ftr L.F. p S.SB
-Curb Zoned Other Than R -1 or F.-2 - Curb, Cutter i Pavement Per L.F ;8. 32
COfflSICT DAME: 11 October 141 Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot . . . . . . . . . . .
Assessment for Cmamte B_-iveway per Square Foot . . . . . .
°z
PROPBRTY O IM
MM OF AMM-03
UY9
L11GTH
.
rRtop.
LIt1.FT.
OF IM-
OVFd
TYPE
AS S.
H
CURB 6 GUT
WM & PVT.
64.iT _
IIIIMM
ASSESS-
MOST
WnZ-
YAY
K..FT.
DflIViWAY
Ti]TAL
�1T AS9E55�9T
TOTAL
ADJL�TED
PSSYSSNE2T �d
Z03M
DU'NBAR
S T R E
T
41.iManuel Ran gel
El Re
6
1
4
42.4 � -i
-n-
A
tl
h2.;Leonso Garcia
E1 Rev
6
17 40.00
40.00 B -1
100%
332.80
*39.00
13.26
74.20
55.65
401.71
w
43:'Cornelio Lugo, Jr. N"
6
18 40.00
I�
40.00 p R -1
1001
235.20
120.00
40.80
88.20
66.15
342.15
i
1�'. Manuel Perez
6 w
lg 40.00
40.00 R -1
100%
235.20
124.00
42.16
81.20
60.0
8.26
45. banuel L. Garcia °" " a6
20 : 4o. co
4o.00 R -1
100% r
235.20
16o.o0
54.4o
-0-
-o-
289.6o
i
46. Paula Guerrera s" 6
21 6 40.00
p
LO. GO R -1
w 100
2 .20 t160.00
54.40
-0-
-0- 28 .60
�'7. Ben Gonzalez E6
22 40.00
40.00 ; R -1
l00%
235.20
160.00
54.40
-0-
-0- 289.6o
4
1+8. Militon G.Villareal :6
p 23 40.00!
40.OL R -1
S 100%
235.20
112.00!
38.08
102.20
76.65 i 349.93
),9JEvangellna Keever �6
24 • 40.00
40.00 R -1
100°'1 235.20
160.00
54.4o
-0-
6 -0- 28c). C 0
0. "Erinia B. Velasouez 11 " 6
25 40.00
40 00 R-1
i nod, i
_p
jra on
Al on
1 :Aurelio Hernandez
6
pG62& 80.00
80.00 R -1
100Ttl 4 0.40
} 20.CD
108.80
-0-
- - 57c4 P
2JAntoni Cruz
a
28
4o.
-1
+ 2
°
L
13.Aurelio Hernandez*
"
6
�93o P 82.46
82.46
B -1
100' 686.07
329.84
112.15
-0-
-0- 798.22 E
i
C A b
PAN
S T
1
1
Cre it given or ex_st -n si ewa
+.+F �t ��. -. is w.. -.-a Fi-i LuV U., CVUU�11 kku6luu Lv -e5 -01
4
F.-MAL 6TREZT Phi' ASSE=' =1 Steet tic.
S S EFOMRS
TWE CF IX- ROVEMM:
_ Rai w"A �rtta
,, EITd c�a�----- Zoned R -1 a� R -2 - Curb, Gutter & Pavtntnt Per L.F. rA!
Zaoed 0tber Iran R -i or R -2 - Curb, Gutter 6 Pevemeat ter LA
CC'JTE3 m LATE: 11 October 1f61 Asseamment for Sidemlk per Sgmre Foot . . . . . . .
Assesmant for Cmzrete D= iveway Per Sgmm Foot . . . . . .
00813RP4T01?
ROAD 7
$ Ii-Ln
0
PROP'S w o7am
N i
�mm a' ADPmo! 'BLOCK LCIY
;ILS m
'iA80T.
`mp.
Lmim.
cop im- !TYPE C��
RGVE6l3T EZ
CURB t4, Glfr -�i
Tit 3 PVT. " bC.FT.
7INJ=
ASSCS.S-
!�P
DRIVE-
WAY
SC.FT.
MUMAY
S-
i TCVL
'!VD..L �IXJiSTED
A PASS A4'
CAMP ANA,
ST
ET
54. James C. Martin
iCarver
1 11
0
47.5
R -1
10
2 1 0 t
A4.6a
--
-0-
Frank Greer
'Carver �1 i 14 ; 44.001.
44.00
R -1 N
1
258.72 1136.00
46.24
198.00
i48. 5o
45x.46 "
56.
James Edward Lusk
Carver 1
13
44.00'
44.00
R -1 I
10
258.72
M.
59.84
-0-
-0-
18.6
7.
Ruzel Tyler
'Carver 11 "
12
1 44.001
44.00
1 R -1
10
a 258.2 '134.00
45.6
ti2mo
00.00
'4 4.28 S
�
1
loo l,
258-72
45.56
"
-
00
6o.
_
Harold Gene Moore
Carver
1
8
44. 00,
44.00
R -1
; 100,
! 258.72 :140.00
47.60
136.00
102.00
4o8.32 "
61.
Dorothy Jones et al
Carver
1- 7
44.004
44.00
R -1
" 100%
258.72 1140.o0
V 47.60
136.00
1 102.00'
4u8.32 �
62.
Gertrude Collier
Carver 7
6
44.00 44.00
R -1
100%
258.72 J176.00
59•8+
-0-
-0-
318.56 I
63•,
Fleet Dev. Co.
Carver
1 5
'44.00 44.00
R -1
10
258.72 11 6.00
1 99.84
-o-
-0-
64•.
Huckman Truck Serv.Co. +Carver C1 4
144.00; 44.00
° R -1
100
258.72
0132.00
44.88
*83.00
62.25
365.85 "
5•
C. C. Speed
Carver
i
3
44.o0I
44.00
R -1
100%
f 258.72
;136.00
46.24
148.00
111.00
415.96
pe.. Andrew Lee Johnson
Garver
i 2
144.00m 44.00
q R -1
100',
258.72
"132.00 44.88
160.00
120.00
423.60
67,'
oma M ny
Carver
1
47-501
47.50
R -1
i
E loo
N 27.0
1 .00
64.60
r
S
i
J
* CredA give., for exist.n* Sri vewa%
� ,
PROPia3'Y 0n'HFIi H
,mstmiea L
Lfl1' :sBtA'. O
ZST�•����� Y' �. 1•.
..Uf++.. � •
" ad w'; O IiMNE ROLL) t..t�GR n �R�v(.�p
H S+aaP a'�.. ►l D!i,+LU,cuiN
nfv,�Ii� �ffY�
Via•a +t CTOR
Silas Hubbard C
G OF z�GVRR�T: Hit -nix Zaphaltla Coacrete Pavex -nt,
5 1
Asa R2W 44 BAW To spa cam
44.50
9. B
Billie I.I. Jones "
Zm-ed P -1 or R -2 - Curb, Gutter & Pavement Per L.F. .
7
2 44. 4
44.00
G. M
Morris Liedecker 5
Zoned Other Than R -1 or R -2 - Curb, Gutter Qo Pavement Per L.B.
0. -4
Xr 11 IF: 11 October 1961
C. T. Boyd "
" " 6
Square Foot
assessment for per q
Ft
44.00
COiti' -
W. Roy 5
assessment for Cancreta Driveduy per Square
Cawaate
7 44.00 4
44.00
5• C
Free Church of God of &
" 5
5 1
SIf?ZKUK
DRIVE DA ",I
WA ASZXiS- TOT I
TOTet
Culberson Taylor-- "
0. R
Ray S. Garza 2
2 43.56 1
1. H
Hector Yanez 4
BM
1 4
4 6
CI
2 SSFS3. �.I�B 6 GM 1E) d
Tr i 8o PPP s PT
P.SZfZS-
RSA'
S� JT. M.ffi' LSuES?SEffi'
8.S a3
.
� ,
PROPia3'Y 0n'HFIi H
,mstmiea L
Lfl1' :sBtA'. O
LIB. FT.
Silas Hubbard C
Carver No. 2 5
5 1
1 44.5 4
44.50
9. B
Billie I.I. Jones "
" 5
5 2
2 44. 4
44.00
G. M
Morris Liedecker 5
1. M
Morris Liedecker 5
j_. C
C. T. Boyd "
" " 6
6 44.00 4
44.00
4.1,;,y W
W. Roy 5
5 7
7 44.00 4
44.00
5• C
Free Church of God of &
" 5
5 1
& 88.00 8
88.00
�8. H
Culberson Taylor-- "
0. R
Ray S. Garza 2
2 43.56 1
1. H
Hector Yanez 4
1 4
4 6
41.S6
D A S T R E T
3 -1 l00% 261.66 1 178.001 0.52 -0- -0-
3 -1 100% 258.72 136.00 46.24 ill
R -1 100+ 258.72 176.00 tgl
-o
R -1 100 2 8. 2 1 6.0o--
R -1 loo; 258.72 136.00 171
R -1 I 10Ct' 1 258.721136.001 46.24
R
R -1 I 10Ct' 1 258.721136.001 46.24
R
LJT v Rn 9
IF i-hUI' OVMMT: EI_•t -ml- - ,Iit,ltic Ccac,„tc Pavzceat, aELEZVU6 BEi=- ..:3 cwr4 Cr0:,
ARte+ RTES "" F�,.rb TO F. ICE culib
11-1 Zr - Curb, Gutter & Pavewnt Per _
Lonei OLber Then R -1 or R -2 - Curb, Gutter PAvement Per L.F.
CONTR CT L .T-�: 11 Octuber 1961 ,.saes=eat for S11ei"U per Square Foot fb
aces -eaE for CaacrAe Drlvekuy per Square F.ct . . . . . . . 4i -
0 -'ER
?L FL: GF LSMOS
D
LOT
L:Ji;"PH
JW.
PROP.
LIN. FT.
uF IM-
?MAC=
ME CF
EN
SEM:1.
inIU.r
CURB i =-
Lai & PVT.
IDK4
G�..FT.
+i JS
1".a;�3-
UM
LRIU.
.� Y
.FT.
-,Y
ss -
Ium
i OT- ,L
3 �
TOT.L
I)ROT:.
Si
S 0
E D A
S T R
E E T
33.
J. L. Carranza
Lrlem Park
1
5
43.5
43.56
R -1
100%
256.13.
174.24
;9.24
-0-
-0-
i,.37
_ -.
Simon Capetillo
1
6
43.5
43.56
R -1
1009''
256.13
134.24
41.64
148.00
_11.06
412.77
5 .
J. L. Carrarza
"
1
7
43.5
43.56
R -i
'0Ce",
256.13
174.24
X9.24
-G-
-u-
>15 -N
Alfredo L. Garcia,, -tat
1
8
43.7
43.56
R -1
10096
256.13
174.24
59.24
_0_
_0-
31-1-37
7.
V- dalupe Gonzales
1
10
87.12
87. 12
R -1
1004
12.2
260.48
88-56
320.00
T0. 'J0
610.6
,.
Thomas Mavor•-a
1
11
43.5
43.56
R -1
100 "p
256.13
134.24
45.64
i48. 0L
i11.00
1 .77
Alston Ter-or
1
12
43.56
43.56
R -1
1001
256.13
174.24
s9.24
_0_
_0_
1 5,
;C,.
bar= ='s V. Chavez
"
1
13
:3.5 6
X3.56
R -1
1
256.13
i74.24
59.24
-0-
._,7
k
LEI
TON
STR
E T
11.
Lawrence L. Lareade
5
1
93.26
93.26
R -a
50%
274.19
373.41+
63.42
-0-
-C-
3376'
City cf Corpus Christi
"
1873.57
R -1B
100%
11,016.59
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
11,016 59
11 0
N E
R 0 A
- - i I!U-L STREET INFROVEMENT ASSESSMESJl' -
EAST SIDE GREENWOOD DRIVE FROM PORT AVENUE TO HORDE ROAD
f
HELD IS BROTHERS CONTRACTOR
OF IMPROVEMENT: Asphaltic Concrete Pavement, ASSESSMENT RATES ' FACE TO FACE CURB ROADWAY
(TYPE
Curb &Gutter. Sidewalks. Driveway
Curb
Zon -1 or R- -Curb, Gutter &Pavement Per L. F.
Zoned Other Than R -1 or R -2 - Curb, Gutter & Pavement Per L.F. $�
CONTRACT DATE: 11 October 1 61
9 Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot
j Assessment for Concrete Driveway Fer Square Foot
LENGTH
LIN.FT.
TYPE M
PERCENT
kSSESSMENT
SIDEWALK
DRIVE-
DRIVEWAY
TOTAL
PROPERTY ON1ER
UM OF ADDITION
ILOCK
LOT
ABUT.
OF IM-
ZONING
OF ASSESS
CURB & GUT
SIDEWA
ASSESS-
WAY
ASSESS-
TOTAL
ADJUST'Er
i
PROP.
ROVEMENT
HARGEABLE
TER & PVT.
SQ.FT.
VENT
SQ.FT.
DENT
ASSESSMENT
ASSESS1•9E7T
F
R T
V F N U
J. debt
Webb Serv. Sta.
lu
I -2
i(,C,%
1 6u 2u I*-,-
- i
1^4_
I. B. Magee
I.B. Magee Lbr.
-'_4.18
� 4.id
I -2
1J0
81.•8
'.E. _
4-,.b8
40
C
`�
11
•i.• B. flagee Lbr. Co.
Cor zs ts.Ar.nx.
1. i -. -
24.ti
I -2
10,_
u
+" ?
4••. -
2'
ti2.4�
L.
_- - - -I
6.I
1. 4n3e: son, Tr.
Corpus He.�k.ts
c3y
lv'_. a
u.G'i
Z -2
u°6
83� -UO
356..
121._a
y`.2C
1.40
=4
r,ISton Terry
Corpus Heights
5
L0&1l
1-!�_.00
100.00'
I -2
1U0'%
832.OJ
352.00
-9. b8
:02.20
-6.65
_ 28.33
S T A
L E Y
�'+).
Fichar3 Valdez
Corlis Heights
6
14
t, -1
175
B -4
1Cul
t+54,_8
.5,.__
_=
1
(.!`
b =.7=
B A L D
W I N
BO -J L E
V A R D
�- 9.ivani;-nocertson
In -.
High ^terra ^e
1
2 &31
71.67
'1.8=
B -4
100$
597.96
28(.48
y .74
_:_
_O_
6?5.7C
Gandy- Rotertson Inc.
High Terrace
1
3C
40.00
4:.00
B-L
100%
-,2.8C
ib0. =C
54.4_,
_O_
Bull-
•Re :ece Dor:_nguez
High Terra,--e
1
29
40.00
4u.,u
B -4
1�_0
33-. 8L,
120.'_-0
4u.8U
88.20
66.1
4-x.'1
u2
Salvador Gonzalez
High Terrace
1
28
4u.00
40.00
R -1
10
235.20
160.00
54.40
-0-
-0-
28'a.tx
1
;103
Jesus Munoz
High Terrace
1
7
40.00
4-00
R -1
100
235.20
120 -u0
40.80
8..2C
66.1
-,4-
04'.Arturo C. Silva
High Terrace
1
26
4o.u0
40.00
R -1
100%
235.20
108.00,
36.72
09.20
81.9u
53.82
�S Palmira Perez
High Terrace
1
25
40.00
40.00
I R -1
100
2-5.2,,
128.Cu
43-52
* -0-
-0-
2 7 °.',2
i
;oaq, -- Viliare�__
H_g}. Terrace
1
2 4
4C., '
R -1
luu%
2C5 -0
134.00
4t.:6
6u. 9:
- - _6
Fo R rez H_.th Terra_e
-
W7. Bon illa.
Hiah Terrace
Ilia,, Terrace
- `
4u.0
FLJ1L SlrJEET 1MPEOVEtELl E_:.F.FSSSM0-_P Sheet N.-
-
B -1
B -1
100
IOG°
EAST SIM GiEL2,:o0D DRIVE Knob] FUN INEI-M, TO ,4.411E MUT)
- -
- -
4
42
g;
COL'TR.CR7a
"
-FF I2iOVEffi T:
Hot-mix Aeahaltic G =n =rats Pe E: ent
PZSE2RBMT 71 FACE TO FACE CU iB
ra.D'.lhY
_O.OV
R -1
_b & Gutter. Sidevullss. Dr iyeaay Zoned R -1 or H- - Cisb, Gutter & Pavenent Per L. F.
L.;• Fx
16!.G,,
54.4i_
- --
Zoned Otber Then R -1 or R -2 - Cwb, Gutter & Paverreat Per•L.F.
29ti.G0
ll
ONDAM DATE:
11 October 1,"&
Aecessment fcs S -de- elk ,er Square Foot . . . . . . . . . . .
.
4o.or
4
-
Asses— nt for Concrete D ivevay per Square Foot
1'
E. R. Hinojosa
4
45
LO.00
40. v0
11
LE fVPil
L N.FT.
TYPE
FERCSI T
:T
4C.00
EMWI.B
DRIVE-
WElAY
120.!0
TOUT L
93.20
,,.
L-
PROPERTY OWI+r�
4
IB OF ADDITION
4o.oc
LOT
PBITP.
OF 3m-
ZOlII6i,
OP AS9�S
CLfftB & GUT
�T
ASSWIS -
tlAx
SASS-
TOTAL
PLJ WTED
:•trs. T r_ nia iiieto
PROP.
_ OVEtEL"t
HPi?t&A�.E
TES & PVT.
Sk t'1,
l7T
^E .FT.
_
F5°°:Zir
[E 1_iT
1
R: moua -
F
7C
76
r _
BF. L
! I �1
BOULE
r',RL
lct n.. Tc a•r•.r P.
d
-
W7. Bon illa.
Hiah Terrace
Ilia,, Terrace
2�_ 1
4u.0
r,).0,
EO.v
-
B -1
B -1
100
IOG°
-
- -
- -
4
42
iG
Euth Belton
"
1
21
40.,,
_O.OV
R -1
1v0
2 i0
16!.G,,
54.4i_
- --
- --
29ti.G0
ll
Ahelino Cantu
4
44
4o.or
4
-
1'
E. R. Hinojosa
4
45
LO.00
40. v0
11
dice Savina & Loan
1
-_
40.0"
4C.00
R -1
lu0`d
2 .20
120.!0
40._ ";
93.20
,,.
L-
°
4
48
4o.oc
40.00
19 z
100
7-1-PH
J -1
100
o8.(j4
2,37L.
97.7
- -
-
-
:•trs. T r_ nia iiieto
_
"'ns. a_a3er
sl
L 0
20 12.00
LG 920.x0
W � �
- I _C._
w
i
-
11-
�n`on_o & Mario Morale
Juen r. Castillo
Ilia,, Terrace
4
4
j
o.
41
r,).0,
EO.v
60.00
30.0v
B -1
B -1
100
IOG°
J
F hletA Mar in
4
42
4L.
40.00
B -1
100
'
1_j L
.g ar
L j
40.CC
40,00
R-1
ll
Ahelino Cantu
4
44
4o.or
4
-
1'
E. R. Hinojosa
4
45
LO.00
40. v0
R -1
10.
117
Pedro Rea
4
4 �7'
Bv.'. C
80.00
R -1
100%
11E
Gonzelo Perez
°
4
48
4o.oc
40.00
R -1
100
J -1
I IV,
}
4
4q
4n-nn
-
:•trs. T r_ nia iiieto
"'ns. a_a3er
sl
L 0
40. go
1
R: moua -
F
7C
76
r _
nr r
20 12.00
LG 920.x0
W � �
- I _C._
w
i
FT1 i3 Lu i 1Z r. TEi ,: PS vA.. a ee c AL
EPL T SIZE GRF. 6.:009 DEVE FLU FORT AVEMM TO 2 Ld� 4-2
-2
P Tc?? OVF16�i
C3J ACt LlF7£
riat -mix Asptalt -_ =rate Fawment.
L�a� S Gutter Eidevalka. Driveaov
la' October 1961
pg, ^.ffi'P BETH .- ' FECC Til FC 0;' MrGa
c^ - ror F -2 - Cv=o, Gui:ter & Pavezient Per L. F. wS+}
�oaed Mer 71_-'1 R -1 e: R -2 - Cwb, Gutter & Fave!enc Per•L.F. M i
Asseemnent for S_devalk per Square Fcrt
Assessment for Gan_rete- D lvevs3 per Egawn Fort
?0- TY GW
IC OF A1HiITIO�
LOT ABUT.
FMP.
LO.VT. Tit'E cF
CF IM- LG'dLtn'
:IovmcNT
PSR�i ZBESSMOT
OF P4R M CM & GUT_
MkMF TER & rVT.
'WgMX
L A'A P ° ' -
SF.PI. M[L i
DRM- M1Ye'iAY TGT. -'
-'AY r.^SESS- TOTAL
- :.FT.:,�i
S 0
0 R A
S T R E T
L23 Arturo Vasquez
^au1 Snyder
12L G_lterto Ortiz
Is Arboleda
„
2 50 42.(x^
2 x'47 126.0
42.02
i26.0o
R -1
R -1
100 247.08
100^ 740.88
132.c3
456.u0
44.91
155.04
81.20 60.0
1G2.2C 76.65
352• 'C'
=72.57
Ikaul Snyder)
4
-
I
T:-ria Sa -inas
2
4
L2.00
42.00
42.00
42.00
42.00
42.uu
R -1
R -1
R -1
10CA
100
100�fi
246.6
246.96
246.96
1 .00;
108.00
120.0
44.88
36.72
4c.80
51.20
123.20
102.20
6,.GO
92.4u
76.65
352.7 4
376.08
36L.L -1
r
27
E. G. Caballero
Guadalupe 'cancl�ez
2
1
44
43
12
F. 0. Jieto
"
2
L2
42.(`0
42.Cu
R -1
100%
246.96
124.0(
L2.L6
y5.20
71.40
Co.
2
4'
42.00
42.00
R -1
100
246.96
128-GO
43.52
88.2u
66.'_5
D7b.bj
''
-u
31
Juan Vela
•F. 0. Ilieto
^ ^
2
40
42.00
42. GO
R -1
1001
246.96
128.00
43.52
88.20
66.15
356.63
2
2
39
38
42.00
42.00
42.00
42.00
B -1
B -1
L00%
100%
349.44
349.44
-
128.0(
28.00
43.52
9.52
88.20
263.20
66.15
197.40
459.11
556.36
p
_32
33
iobert M. Garza
Paul Snyder
" "
^
34
A. P. -£n der
2
.24
.24
B -1
lws
601.04 '
148.96
0.6
263.20
197.4c,
84 .G
w
D u
N B A I
S T R E
E T
I
-
pa en --or ex_ st --' ,9. eva•
-
FIAAi
Ts a STL ci Hj3�fCrJJ E�?TVE Facia P4RT AVzuT'i_G iii wdiz nJr� t
bLiY IY.0 ' C:l.i.1 1 L''.:'!C.
t . - xzenete Iev ert. RA2ffi % Ta FACz CiGrB RaT 'Y
f`ur:, 8a- t3uttr; . r1dc.�al3;s. P: �•c'e.-a
Zoned is -1 w 17-2 - Curt, Gutter & Fnvezp_nt Per L. F. . . . .
r , DF Zoned OtLer T"- R -1 -r R -2 - Curb, Gutter & ' eve:ent ter L.i. Y =�
=TF; i� it Oc cower lyGl Aceesanent for E_.3eJai: per &Tja a pout . . . . . . . . . `
Asseaseut for Can-rate D.•ivevay ),er 6gumv Foot . 7,: d
r
TC 'R7-f C
'
ME OF P�TI^_'103
LOT
Lmn
A�!T.
MO.
LIN.FT.
CE' IM-
ROVEMET
TYPE
21C.-iM
PS'i.L'£iiR
OF P
^ FISL
-emmag I'
CUM & GUT
'i'Or�s & 1�iT.
: 3Sc�fA3_
C, .F'!'.
SIDEi JX
*^ZSES3_
KIM
DRIVE-
W1
G iFT.
MI►ES[AP
f:,�SS-
IMP
TOM
_
TOTAL -
irj_(1.77c'+
D U
N B A F
S T R E
E T
1351A.
P. Snyder
La Arboleda
1
16
57.7
57-75
B -1
loop
480.48
171 -ou
58.14
123.201
2.40
631.02
-
36
Pedro & Juanita Perez
"
1
17
42.00
42.00
B -1
100?
349.44
124.C-
42.16
95.20
71.40
463.00
37
Paul Snyder
" "
1
18
42.00
42.00
B -1
LOOM
349.44
168.oc
57.12
-0-
-0-
406.56
8
Bailey Funeral Home
"
1
19
42.00
42.00
B -1
lou%
349.44
128.0_
43.52
8`x.20
66.1
459.11
L
Gre orie Garcia
1
20
42.00
42.00
R -1
1 1u0%
246.6
132.00
44.88
81.20
6o. =C
52.74
40•Jusnite
fl. Flores
1
21
42.00
42.Ou
R -1
10
246.96
168.00
57.12
-0-
-0-
3u4. o8
41
Antonio 'ruz
°
1
22
42.00
42.00
R -1
100
246.96
116.00
39.44
109.20
81.
368.3'-
-
i
42
Antonio Cruz
1
23
42.00
42.Ou
R -1
100%
246.96
768.00
57.12
-0-
-0-
3u4.CE'
!
43
Nick & Joe Fernandez
1
24
42.00
42.ov
R -1
100%
246.96
116.00
39.44
109.20
81.90
366.30
i
Francisco Garcia
1
25
42.00
42.00
R -1
loop
246.96
128.00
43.52
88.20
66.15
356.63
45
Francisco Garcia
"
1
26
42.00
42.00
R -1
100%
246.96
168.00
57.12
-0-
-0-
304.08
V46IRam
nd Moran
1
27
42.Oo
42.00
R -1
1uOp
246.96
124.00
42.16
95.20
71.40
36o•52
j
I
47IFrank
Trevino
1
29
92.00
92.00
B -1
loop
765.44
24o.00
81.60
260.4o
195.30
1,o42.34
i
Y
J sleet I;o.
EAST
Rr?. k
�^Ye �^F 1•s3rri: ii t -rlt . cyvi+li,lc4Grn:�.Le P_vemeae, i� Ts3 w - - .
_ _ - Curb. Gutter
y_ Y
006a CPOf. P
ROL'.Y
.coed Qtber Tbwn 1.1 or 8 -2 - Curb, Gutt_r & 1 _.went Ftr L.F.
Chi: CP D T..: 1.1 Oct_boer 1961 asesaaeent for iUls]k per Gqu.,ra FC-T-
aseayment for Cooer"t. Driveu_&y Per :3l ro F_�t
S ME e+F +r=On
L�3P
bUP.
PROP.
t]6 IEi-
Liii. FiPN
PS.
�fi
r�CEbtP
'
G�
clt;s 3e GtT.'
T� Qo PVT.
ter- _3
:.,,.F2.
ICE
:: -
Ham'
xaau
Y
FT.
aMt. Y
.3s3:.-
hr�
:vi L
a
�� 1 4
LJII�Ti�
1
Y
o
4 z
�+
H
e1tOP SfTY O HB
C A M
A
T E E
48
14 !
5U
Generosa Vasquez
Alexander L. Garcia
'B. J. Villareal
Casa Blanca
Casa Blanca
Casa Blanca
Casa Blanca
'asa Blanca
asa Blanca
1
1
1
l
1
1
1
4
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5&4
2'&l
.00
42.00
42.00
42.00
42.00
42.00
42.00
42.00
42.00
84.00
48.oD
07.00
50.00
42.00
42.00
42.00
42.00
42.00
42.00
42.00
42.00
84.00
48.00
107.00
R -1
-
R -1
R -1
R -1
R -1
R -1
R -1
R -1•
R -1
B -1
B -1
B -1
1G
100
100,
loop'
100'
100,
lOG°�
100`
1
100
1
100%
246.96
246.96
246.96
246.96
246.96
246.96
246.96
246.96
698.88
6
890.24
"
128.00
128.00
120.00
168.0o
128.00
128.00
128.00
168.00
43.52
43.52
40.80
57.12
43.52
43.52
43.52
57-12
- -
P
148.00
148.00
172.00
-0-
148.00
134.00
*95.00
-0-
-r.--
111.00
111.00
1-29.00
-0-
111.00
loG.50
71.25
-0-
c
4ol.4b
401.48
416.76 g
304.08
401.48
3S�•?8
361.73
304.08
-~
15
l
15
Doman o Guzman
Jose Vela
Leon G. Santos
15
Esmael Jasso
Casa Blanca
aea Blanca
aea Blanca
1
1
1
1
1
-
15
'1�
Abran Garcia
-•C. L. Van Cura
1
1
Alex Cox
Fortunato 14aldonado
t.'laauel Hernandez
Seatia o Gonzales
aaa Blanca
Casa Blanca
asa Blanca
asa Blanca
228,00
144.00
68.00
77.52
48.
91.12
380.00
172.00
164.00
285.00
129.00
138.00
1,061.40
577•
1,119.36
1
1
f:
t
� Credo E -ven F _ de•. a1k: and/or ar --'e mro?.
�- Sheet Ito.
% FINAL STREET INPRGMTENT ASSESSI�N T
EAST SIDE GREENWOOD DRIVE FROM FORT AVENUE TO HORNE ROAD HEIDEMELS BROTHERS CONTRACTOR
TYFE OF Il,1PROVE14ENT: Hot -mix Asphaltic Concrete Pavement, FACE TO FACE CURB ROADWP-Y
Etu b &Gutter. Sidewalks. Driveway -Zoned R -1 or R-2 - Curb, Gutter & Pavement Per L. F. - . $ S-
Zoned Other Than R -1 or R -2 - Curb, Gutter & Pavement Per L.F. $ 8. =2
cONTRACT DATE: 11 October 1961 Assessment for Sidewalk per Square Foot . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.'4 i
Assessment for Concrete Driveway per Square Foot . . . . . - . $ 0.75
°a I
M
PROPERTY OWNER
NAME CF ADDITION
BLOCK
LOT
LENGTH
ABUT.
PROP.
LIP7.FT.
OF IM-
OVEMENT
TYPE OF
ZONING
PERCENT
OF ASSESS
HARGEABLE
ASMSITNT '
CURB & GUT-
TER & PVT.
SIDE -
WALK
SQ.FT.
IDEWALK
ASSESS-
MENT
DRIVE -
WAY
SQ. FT.
IVEWAY
SESS-
-MN1T
TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
f
TOTAL
o1 JUSTEI
ASSESS!IIIE T
S 0 1,
E D A
S T R I
E T
_+
161
Henry Garza
Casa Blanca
2
13
57.00
57.00
B -1
1004
474.24
228._0
77.52
-0-
-d-
551•76
I
162
Pedro Ruiz
Casa Blanca
2
12
48.0o
48.00
B -1
1004
399.36
192.00
65.28
-0-
-0-
464.64
163
Jesus moya
Jesus Mo a
Casa Blanca
Casa Blanca
2
2
11
10
48.00
42.Go
48.00
42.00
B -1
R -1
1004
100%
399.36
246.96
140.00
168.00
47.60
57.12
184.00
-0-
138.00
- -
584.96
304.08
1
�
164
l65
166
Pablo Castellano
L. T. Adamson
Casa Blanca
Casa Blanca
2
2
9
8
42.Co
42.uo
42.00
42.00
R -1
R -1
1004
1004
246.96
246.96
1-28.uo
128.CO
43.52
43.52
148.00
148.00
111.0
11i.o0
4c1.48
401.48
167
168
Emiliano Sanchez
Mar-elo Sanchez
Cesa Bianca
Casa Blanca
2
2
j
6
42.00
42.00
42.00
42.00
R -1
R -1
1004
100%
246.96
246.96
120.0,
120.00
40.6o
4(1. 8o
172.Co
172.00
129.00
129.uO
416.76
416.76
16-
Santos S. Rivera
Casa Blanca
2
5
42.o0
42.00
R -1
1004
246.96
136.00
46.24
124.00
93.00
386.20
-
170
171
112
173
Luis Riojas
Lu e V. Garcia
Sabas Gonzalez
Rudolf Gonzalez
Casa Blanca
Casa Blanca
Casa Blanca
Casa Blanca
2
2
2
2
4
3
2
1
42.00
42.00
42.00
42.03
42.00
42.00
42. o0
42.03
R -1
R -1
R -1
R -1
1004
1004
loot
1004
-
246.96
246.96
246.96
246.96
168. GO
128.00
120.00
128.12
57.12
43.52
40.80
43.56
-0-
148.00
172.00
148.00
-0-
111.00
129.00
111.00
304.08
401.48•
416.76
401.52
4
174
Henry Trujillo
Crockett Heights
1
1
125.03
125.03
R -1
554
404.35
452.12
84-55*1
172.00
129.00
617.90
FC)
FT
CO=,
E O�r IK- p e tc 1- L-icmr L,
RA F
FDAY'AY
?,�,red F-I Cr R-2 - C--,, Gu-.Ler & -�a-ema,; �e- L. F.
1 5 J- I
?,,mefA ot:xr Than F-I c-- ?-2 - I..'urb, .:tier & ?a.rejoaL
At:se3m=n-, fQr fldewa- _er S,_mre F. -,t
kzli
jkzsesgmnc fur Coatre,, Dr-lve.sy per I-quiwe Foct
0
Mam LIN.
T
PrRccm AEZM—Cklw smr-_ ;Imi;plz ERVE- Tvgvi:ly
TOT "I
ii-a OF AMT-1-Ano IM ABM. CF Li- :-s OF
OF _A WK-. CURS & mr. TiALr I NAY -CESS-
HVIT FT.
W-PYL
f-Dju6TK
fc
..:Z
R;-Y-GFA--r MP & PVT. 0
T 0
1 3 T R E T
6.661--5 4 L. tzj 54 268.c-,� ecl.c,�
d, -5
2 1 4' 1--,66.
100 7,446.61 1. 722.
L
OF oRT US %RT.STT WFERN
_u)
25,4
�--Um
_SFZSI:D TO FRIVPrIE TO -MTrl OWMRS
A q To
7r
ITOTALC017—^- -
AFk '87 6,
EKY ASL- aErUS
in�' AM-
55
SECTION 4= BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED That in the event the actual frontage
of any property herein assessed shall be found upon the completion of said
improvements to be greater or less than the number of feet hereinabove stated
the assessments herein set against any such property and against the real and
true owner or owners thereof shall be, and the same are hereby declared to be
increased or decreased as the case may be, in the proportion which said excess
or deficiency or frontage shall bear to the whole number of front feet of property
actually improved in accordance with the front foot rate of assessment herein
adopted, it being the intention that each parcel of property and the real and
true owner or owners thereof abutting on the portion of Greenwood Drive, within
the limits above defined, shall pay for said improvements under the "FRONT FOOT
RULE OR PLAN", which rule or plan is hereby found and determined to be just and
equitable and to produce a substantial equality, having in view of the special
benefits to be received and the burdens imposed thereby; and it is further
ordained that upon final completion and acceptance of said improvements on said
portion of Greenwood Drive, all certificates hereinafter provided for, issued to
evidence said assessments against said parcels of property abutting upon said
street, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, shall be issued in
accordance with, and shall evidence the actual frontage of said property and
the actual cost of said improvements, the amount named in said certificate in
no case to exceed the amount herein assessed against such property unless such
increase be caused by an excess of front footage over the amount hereinabove
stated, such actual cost and such actual number of front feet, if different
from the bereinabove shown in Section 3 hereof, to be determined by the
Director of Public Works upon completion of said work on said street, and the
findings of said Director of Public Works shall be final and binding upon all
parties concerned.
SECTION 8. That the several sums mentioned above in Section 3 hereof
assessed against said parcels of property abutting on the portion of Greenwood
Drive, within the limits defined, and the real and true owners thereof, whether
named or correctly named herein or not, subject to the provisions of Section 4
hereof, together with interest thereon at the rate of five per cent (3%a) per
•a9—
�
I
SECTION 4= BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED That in the event the actual frontage
of any property herein assessed shall be found upon the completion of said
improvements to be greater or less than the number of feet hereinabove stated
the assessments herein set against any such property and against the real and
true owner or owners thereof shall be, and the same are hereby declared to be
increased or decreased as the case may be, in the proportion which said excess
or deficiency or frontage shall bear to the whole number of front feet of property
actually improved in accordance with the front foot rate of assessment herein
adopted, it being the intention that each parcel of property and the real and
true owner or owners thereof abutting on the portion of Greenwood Drive, within
the limits above defined, shall pay for said improvements under the "FRONT FOOT
RULE OR PLAN", which rule or plan is hereby found and determined to be just and
equitable and to produce a substantial equality, having in view of the special
benefits to be received and the burdens imposed thereby; and it is further
ordained that upon final completion and acceptance of said improvements on said
portion of Greenwood Drive, all certificates hereinafter provided for, issued to
evidence said assessments against said parcels of property abutting upon said
street, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, shall be issued in
accordance with, and shall evidence the actual frontage of said property and
the actual cost of said improvements, the amount named in said certificate in
no case to exceed the amount herein assessed against such property unless such
increase be caused by an excess of front footage over the amount hereinabove
stated, such actual cost and such actual number of front feet, if different
from the bereinabove shown in Section 3 hereof, to be determined by the
Director of Public Works upon completion of said work on said street, and the
findings of said Director of Public Works shall be final and binding upon all
parties concerned.
SECTION 8. That the several sums mentioned above in Section 3 hereof
assessed against said parcels of property abutting on the portion of Greenwood
Drive, within the limits defined, and the real and true owners thereof, whether
named or correctly named herein or not, subject to the provisions of Section 4
hereof, together with interest thereon at the rate of five per cent (3%a) per
•a9—
annum with reasonable attorneyts fee and all costs and expenses of collection,
If incurred, are hereby declared to be made a first and prior lien upon the
respective parcels of property, against which same are assessed from and
after the date said improvements were ordered by said City Council, to -wit:
October 28, 1961, and a personal liability and charge against the real and true
owner or owners thereof, whether or not such owner or owners be named or correct-
ly named herein, and that said lien shall be and constitute the first and prior
enforceable claim against the property assessed and shall be a first and
paramount lien superior to all other liens, claims or title, except for lawful
ad valorem taxes; and that the same so assessed shall be payable as follows,
to-.wits in sixty (90) equal installments, the first of which shall be due and
payable twenty (20) days after the date said improvements are completed and
accepted by the said City Council, and the remaining fifty —nine (59) installments
to be due and payable on or before the first (lst) day of each of the next
succeeding months thereafter together with interest thereon at the rate of five
(5%) per cent per annum from said date of acceptance, payable monthly as it
accrues; provided, however, that the owners of said property shall have the
privilege of paying any one, or all, of such installments at any time before
maturity thereof by paying the total amount of principal due, together with
interest accrued, to the date of payment; and provided, further, that if default
be made in payment of any such installments of principal or interest promptly
as same matures, then the entire amount of said assessment upon which such
default is made, shall, at the option of Heldenfels Brothers, their successors
or assigns, be, and become immediately due and payable and shall be collectible
together with reasonable attorneyts fees and all costs and expenses of collection,
if incurred.
SECTION S. That the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, shall not in any
manner be liable for the payment of any sums hereby validly assessed against
any abutting property, and the real and true Owner or owners thereof, but
Beldenfels Brothers shall look solely to such property and the real and tree
owner or owners thereof, for the payment of the sums validly assessed against
—9—
l
1
said respective parcels of property, but said City shall be obligated to
furnish Heldenfels Brothers valid assessments and assessment certificates and
shall exercise all of its lawful powers and aid in the enforcement and
collection of said liens and assessments= and if default shall be made in
the payment of any of said sums herein assessed against the said parcels of
property, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, collection thereof
shall be enforced at the option of Heldenfels Brothers, their heirs or assigns,
either by suit in any Court having jurisdiction or by sale of the property
assessed as nearly as possible in the manner as may be provided by law and
Charter in force in said City for the sale of property for the collection of
ad valorem taxes.
SECTION 7. That for the purpose of evidencing said assessments, the
liens securing same and the several sums assessed against the said parcels of
property and the real and true owner or owners thereof, and the time and terms
of payment, and to aid in the enforcement thereof, assignable certificates
shall be issued by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, to Heldenfels Brothers
upon the completion of said improvements in said street and acceptance thereof
by said City Council, which certificates shall be executed by the Mayor in
the name of the City, attested by the City Secretary with the corporate seal
of said City, and which certificates shall declare the amounts of said
assessments and the times and terms thereof, the rate of interest thereon, the
date of the completion and acceptance of the improvements for which the certificate
Is issued, and shall contain the names of the apparent true owner or owners as
accurately as possible, and the description of the property assessed by lot
and bbock number, or front foot thereof, or such other description as may other-
wise identify the same, and if the said property shall be owned by an estate
or firm, then to so state the fact shall be sufficient and no error or mistake
in describing such property or in giving the name of any owner or owners, or
otherwise, shall in anywise invalidate or impair the assessment levied hereby
or the certificate issued in evidence thereof.
That the said certificate shall further provide substantially that if
default shall be made in the payment of any installment of principal or
-10-
interest when due then at the option of Heldenfels Brothers, their successors
or assigns, or the holder thereof, the whole of said assessment evidenced
thereby shall at once become due and payable, and shall be collectible with
reasonable attorneyts fees and all expenses and costs of collection, if
incurred, and said certificate shall set forth and evidence the personal
liability of the real and true owners or owner of such property, whether named
or correctly named therein or not, and the lien upon such property, and that
said lien is first and paramount thereon, superior to all other liens, titles
and charges, except for lawful ad valorem taxes, from and after the date said
Improvements were ordered by said City Council, to -wit, October 28, 1881, and
shall provide in effect that if default shall be made in the payment thereof,
the same may be enforced, at the option of Heldenfels Brothers, or their
successors and assigns, by the sale of the property therein described in the
manner provided for the collection of ad valorem taxes as above recited, or by
suit in any Court having jurisdiction.
That said certificates shall further recite in effect that all the proceed-
ings with reference to making said improvements have been regularly had in
compliance with the law and Charter in force in said City and the proceedings
of said City Council of said City, and that all prerequisites to the fixing of
the assessment lien against the property therein described, or attempted to be
described, and the personal liability of the real and true owner or owners
thereof, evidenced by such certificates, have been regularly done and performed,
which recitals shall be evidence of all the matters and facts so recited and
no further proof thereof shall be required in any Court.
That all said certificates may have coupons attached thereto in evidence
of each or any of the several installments thereof, which may be signed with
the facsimile signatures of the Mayor and City Secretary.
That said certificates shall further provide in effect that the City of
Corpus Christi, Texas, shall exercise all of its lawful powers, when requested
so to do by the holder of said certificates, to aid in the enforcement and
collection thereof, and said certificates may contain other and further recitals
-11-
pertinent and appropriate thereto. It shall not be necessary that said
certificates shall be in the exact form as above set forth, but the substance
and effect thereof shall suffice.
SECTION 8. That all such assessments levied are a personal liability
and charge against the real and true owner or owners of the property described*
or attempted to be described, notwithstanding such owner or owners may not
be named or correctly named, and any irregularity in the name of the property
owner, or the description of any property or the amount of any assessment,
or in any other matter or thing shall not in anywise invalidate or impair any
assessment levied hereby or any certificate issued} and such mistake, or error,
Invalidity or irregularity whether in such assessment or in the certificate
issued in evidence thereof, may be, but is not required to be, to be enforce-
able, corrected at any time by the said City Council of the City of Corpus
Christi, Texas. Further that the omission of said improvements in front of
any part or parcel of property abutting upon a portion of Greenwood Drive, which
is exempt from the lien of said assessment, shall in no wise effect or impair
the validity of assessments against the other parcels of property abutting
upon said street; and that the total amounts assessed against the respective
parcels of property abutting upon said street, within the limits herein defined,
and the real and true owner or owners thereof, are the same as, or less than,
the estimate of said assessment prepared by the Director of Public Works
and approved and adopted by said City Council and are in accordance with the
proceedings of said City Council relative to said improvements and assessments
therefor, and with the terms, powers and provisions of said Chapter 108 of the
Acts of the First - Called Session of the 40th Legislature of the State of Texas,
known as Article 1106-b of Vernon *s Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas and the
Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, under which terms, powers and
provisions said proceedings, said improvements and assessments were had and
made by said City Council.
Ii SECTION 9. The fact that Greenwood Drive has become an important
-12-
thoroughfare and the fact that the present condition of said street, within
the limits herein defined, is dangerous to the health and public welfare of
the inhabitants thereof creates a public emergency and an imperative public
necessity, requiring the suspension of the Charter rule that no ordinance
or resolution shall be passed finally on the date of its introduction, and
that said ordinance shall be read at three (3) several meetings of the City
Council, and the Mayor having declared that such emergency and imperative
public necessity exists, and having requested that said Charter rule be
suspended, and that this ordinance be passed finally on the date of its
introduction, and that this ordinance take effect and be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of November, A. D., 1961.
ATTEST:
City' ecr tary
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
City At'torne
i
E
MAY �A
City of Corpus Christi,
Texas
—13—
� 1
�I
1
i
A �
CORPUS CHRISTI TEXAS /
-✓ DAY OF �9 r
TO THE MENBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE OF THE FORE-
GOING ORDINANCE# A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND IMPERATIVE NECESSITY EXIST FOR
THE SUSPENSION-of THE CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT THAT NO ORDINANCE OR
RESOLUTION SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED AND THAT
SUCH ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE MEETINGS OF THE CITY
COUNCIL; I -, THEREFOREX HEREBY REQUEST THAT YOU SUSPEND SAID CHARTER RULE
OR REQUIREMENT AND PASS THIS ORDINANCE FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED
OR AT THE PRESENT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
RESPECTFULLYS
7
THE CITY OF CHRISTI'TEXAS
THE CHARTER RULE WAS SUSPENDED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
BEN F. MCDONALD 1 \
TON R. SWANTNER 1
DR. JAMES L. BARNARD
Jose R. DELEON
M. P. MALDONADO
W. J. ROBERTS
JAMES H. YOUNG
THE ABOVE ORDINANCE WAS PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
BEN F. MCDONALD
TON R. SWANTNER
DR. JAMES L. BARNARD
Jose R. DELEoN 67—
M. P. MALDONADO
W. J. ROBERTS
JAMES H. YOUNG �y
INTER - OFFICE COMMUNICATION
Dept. LEGAL
`0 T. RAY KRING, CITY SECRETARY
Front JAMES S. TUNNELL, ASST. CITY ATTORNEY Date JUNE 7, 1962
SldlijeCt ASSIGNMENT OF GREENWOOD DRIVE PAVING ASSESSMENTS FROM HELDENFELS BROS. TO
CITY OF ORPUS HRISTI
ATTACHED HERETO IS ASSIGNMENT FROM HELDENFEL5 BROTHERS TO CITY
OF CORPUS CHRISTI IN CONNECTION WITH THE GREENWOOD DRIVE PAVING ASSESSMENTS.
THE ASSIGNMENT HAS BEEN RECORDED IN THE DEED RECORDS AS WELL AS THE DEED OF
TRUST RECORDS OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS.
J ES J. IuNNELL
SSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
JST:JKH
ATTACHMENT
631
OW }ill
TBB STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF NUECES
.d -
1
KNOW ALL MEN BY TRESS PR MMSt VOL 962 PAGE221
A
WHEREAS, by Resolution adopted on the 28th day of October, 1981, by
Its City Council, the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, hereinafter called "said
City", determined the public necessity for, and ordered the improvement of
Greenwood Drive in said City between certain limits in said resolution defined,
and provided that a part of the cost of such improvements be assessed and made
a lien on property abutting thereon; and,
WHEREAS, a Notice of such action on the part of said City was duly filed
in the office of the County Clerk of Nueces County on the 25th day of October,
1981, and recorded in Volume 810, page 442,of the Mortgage Records of said County;
and,
WHEREAS, by an ordinance passed by said City on the 15th day of November,
1981, and other proceedings of said City Council, there were levied assessments
against the following described properties abutting said street, and against the
real and true owners thereof, to -wit:
Description of Property Amount of Assessment
Item 4:
Lot 12, Block "F", La Gloria Addition,
an Addition to the City of Corpus
Christi,Nueces County, Texas, as shown
by map recorded in Vol. 7, pg. 47, Map
Records of Nueces,County, Texas: $ 738.31
Item 5'
Lots 8 & 9, Block "I ", La Gloria
Addition, an Addition to the City of
Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas,
as shown by map recorded in Vol. 7, pg.
47, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas: $ 1,038.18
co Item 7t
Lot 91 Block 3 in Leary Addition to the
w City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown
by map recorded in Vol. 9, pg. 8, Map
Records of Nueces County, Texas: $ 378.32
Item 9:
The North 80 ft, of Lot or Tract 1, Block °
19 Centerview Addition, Corpus Christi,
Texas, recorded in Vol. A. page 47, Nap
Records, Nueces County, Texas: $ 471.83
Item 15%
Lot 18, Block 4 in the E1 Rey Addition to
the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown
by map recorded in Vol, 81 pg, 52, Map Records
of Nusces County, Texas: $
488,78
Item 18:
Lot 17, Block 4 of the El Rey Addition to
the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by
map recorded in Vol, 81 pg. 529 Map Records of
Nusces County, Texas: $
370.13
Item 18:
Lot 19, Block 49 E1 Rey Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded
in Vol, 8, pg. 52, Map Records,Nueces County,Texas:
$
370,13
Item 19:
Lot 20, Block 4, E1 Red Addition to the City of
Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded in
Vol. 8, pg. 52, Map Records, Nueces County,Texas: $
382.35
Item 24:
Lot 25, Block 4, E1 Rey Addition to the City of
Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded
in Vol, 8, pg. 52, Map Records,Nueces County,
Texas: $
382.27
Item 26
Lot 27, Block 4, E1 Rey Addition to the City of
Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded
In Vol, S,pg. 52, Map Records,}gusces County,
Texas: $
358,41
Item 27•
Lot 28, Block 4, E1 Rey Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol. 8, pg. 52, Map Records of
Nusces County, Texas: $
304,81
Item 30:
Lot 7, Block 5, E1 Rey Addition to the City
Of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol. 8, pg. 52, Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas: $
342.15
Item 31:
Lot 8, Block 5, El Bey Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol. 8, pg, 52, Map Records of
Nusces County, Texas: $
342.15
Item 32•
Lot 9, Block 5, E1 Rey Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol, 8, page 52, Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas: $
289.80
Item m 33£
Lot 10, Block 5, E1 Rey Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
.recorded in Vol. 8, pg. 52, Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas: $
342,15
_2_
VOL
962 PAGE229
Item 37:
Lot 14, Block 8, E1 Rey Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Volume 8, page 62, Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas:
$ 342.16
Item 38:
Lot 16, Block 6, El Rey Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Volume 8, page 62, Map Records
of Nueces County, Texas:
$ 342,16
Item 39•
Lot 16, Block 6, El Rey Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Volume 8, pg. 62, Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas:
$ 346.04
Item 41•
Lot 16, Block e, El Rey Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol. 8, pg. 62, Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas:
$ 294.73
Item 43:
Lot 18, Block 6, E1 Rey Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol, 8, pg. 62, Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas:
$ 342,16
Item 44:
Lot 19, Block 6, E1 Rey Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol, 8, pg. 62, Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas:
$ 338.28
Item 46:
Lot 20, Block 6, E1 Rey Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol. at pg, 62, Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas:
$ 338,26
Item 46:
Lot 21, Block 8, El Rey Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol. 8, pg. 62, Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas:
$ 278,72
Item 48:
Lot 23, Block 6, E1 Rey Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol. 8, pg, 629 Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas:
$ 349,93
Item 60:
Lot 26, Block 6, El Rey Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol, 89 pg, 62, Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas:
$ 342.16
Item 62
Lot 28, Block 8, El Rey Addition to the City
Of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol. 8, pg, 62, Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas:
$ 342.16
-3-
0
i
VOL 962 FAGE23O
Item 84:
Lot 18, Block 1, Carver Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, recorded in Volume
9, pg, 8409 Map Records of Nueces County,
Texas:
$ 343.90
Item 88•
Lot 14, Block 1, Carver Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, recorded in Volume
9, pg. 840, Map Records, Nueces County,Texas:
$ 463.46
Item Be:
Lot 13, Block 1, Carver Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, recorded in Vol. 9,
pg. 18, Map Records, Nueces County, Texas:
$ 416.96
Item 87:
Lot 12, Block 19 Carver Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, recorded in Vol. 99
pg. 18, Map Records of Nusces County, Texas:
$ 394,28
Item 88:
Lot 11, Block 1, Carver Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol, 9, pg. 18, Map Records of
Nusces County, Texas:
$ 409.28
Item 89:
Lots 9 & 10, Block 1, Carver Addition to the
City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by
map recorded in Vol. 9, pg. 18, Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas:
$ 742,16
Item 60•
Lot 8, Block 1, Carver Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
!
recorded in Vol. 9, pg. 18, Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas:
$ 408.32
Item 61:
Lot 7, Block 1, Carver Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol. 9, pg. 18, Map Records of
Nusces County, Texas:
$ 408,32
Item 62:
Lot 6, Block 1, Carver Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol. 9, pg. 18, Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas:
$ 400.68
Item 63:
Lot 8, Block 11 Carver Addition to the City
of Corpus Christ4, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol. 9, pg. 18, Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas:
$ 418.96
Item 64:
Lot 4, Block 1, Carver Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol. 9, pg. 18, Map Records of
Nusces County, Texas:
$ 368,88
-4-
VOL
962 PAGE231
Item 85:
Lot 39 Block 1, Carver Addition to the City of
Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded
in Vol, 9, pg, 18, Map Records of Nueces County,
Texass
$, 415.98
Item 66:
Lot 2, Block 1, Carver Addition to the City of
Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded
sf
in Vol. 9, pg. 18, Map Records of Nusces County,
Texas:
$ 423.80
Item 68:
Lot 1, Block 5, Carver Addition 92, Corpus
Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded in
Vol. 9, pg. 34, Map Records of Nueces County,
Texas:
$ 322.18
Item 89
Lot 2, Block 5, Carver Addition #2, Corpus
Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded in
Vol. 99 pg, 340 Map Records of Nueces County,
Texas:
$ 318,58
Item 70:
Lot 3, Block S, Carver Addition #2, Corpus
Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded in
Vol. 98 pg. 34, Map Records of Nueces County,
Texas:
$ 400.58
Item 71,
Lot 4,'Block 5, Carver Addition #2, Corpus
Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded in
Vol, 9, pg, 34, Map Records of Nueces County,
Texas:
$ 415.98
Item 72:
Lot 5, Block 5, Carver Addition #2, Corpus
Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded in
Vol. 9, pg. 34, Map Records of Nueces County,
Texas:
$ 408,32
Item 73:
Lot 8, Block B. Carver Addition #2, Corpus
Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded in
Vol. 9, pg. 34, Nap Records of Nueces County,
Texas:
$ 390.18
Item 74:
Lot 7, Block S. Carver Addition #2, Corpus
Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded in Vol.
99 pg. 34, Map Records of Nueces County,Texas:
$ 405,45
Item 75:
Lot 10, Block 5, Carver Additi #2, Corpus
01
Christi, Texas, as shown by ma in
Vol, 9, pg. 34, Map Records of Aueces County,
Texas
$ 408,32
6
Item 77s
Lot 11, Block 5, Carver
Additiop #2, Corpus
Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded in
Vol. 9, pg. 34, Map Records of 0ueces,County,
Texas:
i
$ 418,98
_5-
1
VOL 0,362 PAGE 232
Item 78:
Lots 12 & 13, Block 8, Career Addition d2, Corpus
Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded in Vol.
i
9, pg, 34, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas:
$ 738.14
Item 79:
i
i
Lot 1, Block 1, Harlem Park Subdivision, Corpus
Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded in Map
Records of Nueces County, Texas:
$ 412.77
Item 81:
Lot 3, Block 1, Harlem Park Addition, Corpus
Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded in Vol.
99 pg. 579 Map Records, NuecBs County, Texas:
$ 412.77
.I
Item 82:
Lot 4, Block 1, Harlem Park Addition, Corpus
Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded in Vol.
10, pg. 8, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas:
$ 412.77
I
Item 84:
{
Lot 8, Block 1, Harlem Park Addition, Corpus
Christi, Texas, as shown by corrected map of
said Block 1, recorded in Vol. 10, pg. S, Map
Records of Nueoes County, Texas:
$ 402,27
Item 88:
Lot 11, Block 1, Harlem Park Addition, Corpus
Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded in Map
Records of Nusces County, Texas:
$ 402.27
Item 89:
Lo 12, Block 1, Harlem Park Addition, Corpus
Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded in Map
j
Records of Nueces County, Texas:
$ 402.27 1
Item 9o:
Lot 13, Block 1, Harlem Park Addition, Corpus
Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded in Map
Records of Nueces County, Texas:
$ 318.37
Item 97:
The west 44 ft, of Lots 10 & 11, Block 8,
Corpus Heights Addition to Corpus Christi ,Texas,
as shown by map recorded in Vol, 4, pg. 17, Map
Records of Nueces County, Texas:
$ 1,028.33
I
Item 98•
Lot 14, Block 8, Corpus Heights Addition to
Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded
in Map Records of Nusces County, Texas:
$ 1,082,73
Item 101•
Lot 29, Block 1, High Terrace Addition to the
City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol, 8, pg. 14, Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas:
$ 438,10 i
Item 102:
Lot 28, Block 1, High Terrace Addition to the
City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol. 8, pg. 14', Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas:
$ 289,80
Item 103: VOL .362 PAGE233
Lot 27, Block 11 High Terrace Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded
in Vol, 8, pg. 14, Map Records of Nueces County,
Texass
$ 342,18
Item 104:
i
Lot 28, Block 1, High Terrace Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded
in Vol, 8, pg. 14, Map Records of Nueces County,
Texas:
$ 347,00
Item 108:
Lot 28, Block 1, High Terrace Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shows by map recorded
in Vol. S. pgl4, Map Records of Nueces County,
Texas:
$ 278,72
Item 108:
Lot 24, Block 1, High Terrace Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded
In Vol. 8, pg. 14, Map Records of Nueces County,
Texas:
$ 338,28
Item 107:
�
Lot 23, Block 1, High Terrace Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded
In Vol. 8, pg. 14, Map Records of Nusces County,
Texas:
$ 289.80
r
Item 110:
Lot 20, Block 1, High Terrace Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded
In Vol. 8, pg, 14, Map Records,Nueces County,Texas:
$ 342,18
Item llla.,d Lot 18
Lot 19,/Block 1, Hfgh Terrace Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as Shown by map recorded
in Vol, 8, pg. 14, Map Records of Nusces County,
Texas:
$ 898.80
Item 113• d 441
Lot 40, 4,
/B ock High Terrace Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded
In Vol, 8, pg. 14, Map Records,Nueces County,Texas:
$ 828,98
Item 114:
Lot 42, Block 4, Resubdivision of High Terrace
Addition to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as
shown by map recorded in Vol, 89 pg, 14, Map
Records, Nueces County, Texas:
$ 378,32 �
Item 114A•
Lot 43, Block 4, High Terrace Addition to the
City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol, 8, pg, 14, Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas:
$ 342.15 i
Item 118:
Lot 43, Block 4, Resubdivision of High Terrace
Addition to Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol. 89 pg. 14, Map Records of Nueces
County, Texas:
$ 342,18
-7-
9692 PAGE234
VOL
Item 117•
{
Lots 46 & 47, Block 4, High Terrace Addition to the
City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map filed
for record in Map Records of Nueces County, Texas:
i
$ 617,15
i
Item 118:
Lot 48, Block 4, resubdivision of High Terrace
Addition to Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
i
recorded in Vol. 8, pg. 14, Map Records of Nueces
County, Texas:
$ 327.68
Item 119:
Lot 49, Block 4, resubdivision of High Terrace
Addition to Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol. 8, pg. 14, Map Records of Nueces
County, Texas:
$ 342.15
Item 120:
Lot 80, Block 4, High Terrace Addition to Corpus
Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded in Vol.
89 pg. 14, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas:
$ 349.93
Item 121:
Lot 51, Block 4, High Terrace Addition to Corpus
Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded in Vol.
8, pg. 14, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas:
$ 278.72
I
Item 123:
Lot 80, Block 2, Arboleda Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in the office of the County Clerk of
Nueces County, Texas:
$ 352.89
' Item 124:
Lots 47, 48 & 49, Block 2, La Arboleda Addition
to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by
map filed for record in office of County Clerk of
Nueces County, Texas:
$ 972.57
Ih Item 126:
� Lot 48, Block 2, La Arboleda Addition to the
/City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
filed for record in office of County Clerk of
Nueces County, Texas:
$ 352.74
fff Item 128:
Lot 43, Block 2, La Arboleda Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map filed
for record in office of County Clerk of Nueces
County, Texas:
$ 352.74
Item 130:
Lot 41, Block 2, La Arboleda Addition to the City
I. of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map filed
for record in office of County Clerk of Nueces
County, Texas:
$ 388.63
p Item 139:
Lot 20, Block 1, La Arboleda Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map filed for
record in office of County Clerk,Nueces County,Texas:
$ 382.74
Item 140: vas 962 PAGE235
Lot 21, Block 1, La Arboleda Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map filed for
record in office of County Clerk of Nueces County,
Texas: $ 304.08
Item 148•
Lot 28, Block 11 La Arboleda Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map filed for
record in office of County Clerk of Nueces County,
Texas: $ 304.08
Item 147:
Lots 28 and 29, Block 1, La Arboleda Addition to the
City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded
in Vol. 8, pg. 8, Map Records, Nueces County, Texas:
$ 1,042.34
Item 149:
Lot 14i Block 1, Casa Blanca Addition to the City
Of Corpus Chrsti, Texas, as shown by map recorded in
Vol, 8, pg, 10, Map Records of Nusces County,Texas: $
Item 181•
Lot 12, Block 1, Casa Blanca Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded
in Vol. 9, Pg. 10, Map Records of Nusces County,
Texas: $
Item 182:
Lot 11, Block 1, Casa Blanca Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded
In Vol. 99 pg, 109 Map Records of Nueces County,
Texas: $
Item 183:
Lot 10, Block 1, Casa Blanca Addition to the City
Of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded
in Vol, 9, pg, 10, Map Records of Nueces County,
Texas: $
Item 184:
Lot 9, Block 1, Casa Blanca Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded
in Vol. 9, pg, 10, Map Records of Nueces County,
Texas: $
Item 188:
Lot 8, Block 1, Casa Blanca Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded
in Vol. 99 pg, 10, Map Records of Nueces County,
Texas: $
Item 188:
Lot 7, Block 1, Casa Blanca Addition to the City
Of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded
In Vol, 9, pg, 10, Map Records of Nueces County,
Texas:
Item 187
Lot 6, Block 1, Casa Blanca Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded
in Vol. 99 pg, 10, Map Records of Nueces County,
Texas:
-9-
386.63
401,48
416,76
304.08
401.48
390.98
361.73
293.20
- -�
VOL 962 PAGE 236
Item 158:
Lots 4 & 5, Block 1, Casa Blanca Addition
to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as
shown by map recorded in Vol. 9, pg. 10,
Map Records of Nueces County, Texas:
$ 892.08
Item 159•
Lot 3, Block 1, Casa Blanca Addition to
the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown
by map recorded in Vol. 9, pg. 10, Map
Records of Nueces County, Texas:
$ 554.40
Item 160:
Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, Casa Blanca Addition to
the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown
by map recorded in Vol. 9, pg. 10, Map
Records of Nueces County, Texas:
$ 999.04
Item 163:
Lot 11, Block 2, Casa Blanca Addition to
the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown
by map recorded in Vol. 99 pg. 109 Map
Records of Nueces County, Texas:
$ 584.96
Item 164:
Lot 10, Block 2, Casa Blanca Addition to
the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown
by map recorded in Vol. 9, pg. 10, Map
Records of Nueces County, Texas:
$ 304.08
Item 165:
Lot 9, Block 2, Casa Blanca Addition to the
City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by
map recorded in Vol. 9, pg. 10, Map Records
of Nueces County, Texas:
$ 401.48
Item 166:
Lot 8, Block 2, Casa Blanca Addition to the
City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by
map recorded in Vol. 9, pg. 10, Map Records
of Nueces County, Texas:
$ 401.48
Item 167:
Lot 7, Block 2, Casa Blanca Addition to the
City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol. 9, pg. 109 Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas:
$ 416.76
Item 168:
Lot 6, Block 2, Casa Blanca Addition to the
City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by
map recorded in Vol. 9, pg. 10, Map Records
of Nueces County, Texas:
$ 416.76
Item 169:
Lot 5, Block 2, Casa Blanca Addition to the
City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by
map recorded in Vol. 9, pg. 10, Map Records
of Nueces County, Texas:
$ 386.20
Item 170•
tot 4, Block 2, Casa Blanca Addition to the
City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by
-map recorded in Vol. 9, pg. 100 Map Records
of Nueces County, Texas:
$ 304.08
-10-
t--
1 it
VOL 0182 PAGE237
Item 172•
Lot 2, Block 2, Casa Blanca Addition to the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map recorded
in Vol. 9, pg. 10, Map Records of Nueces County,
Texas: $ 401.48
Item 173•
Lot 1, Block 2, Casa Blanca Addition to the
City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by map
recorded in Vol. 9, pg. 10, Map Records of
Nueces County, Texas: $ 401.52
Item 174•
Lot 1, Block 1, Crockett Heights Addition to
the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as shown by
map recorded in Vol. 11, pg. 53, Map Records
of Nueces County, Texas: 0 $ 601.39,
and,
WBERKAS, the improvements on said street were constructed by Heldenfels
Brothers, contractor, under the terms of a contract with said City, and
certificates of special assessment were issued by said City to said Contractors:
NOW, THEREFORE, SNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Heldenfels Brothers,
a partnership, of Nueces County, Texas, for and in consideration of the sum of
($ Dollars to them
in hand paid by said City, have granted, transferred and assigned, and do by
these presents grant, transfer and assign unto the said City the certificates of
special assessment evidencing the assessments for said street improvements levied
against the above described properties together with all rights, titles, interests,
liens and power`s securing payment of same.
It is expressly understood that the assignment of said certificates of
special assessment is made without recourse on the undersigned.
EXECUTED this the ~ d
THE STATE(1" TEXAS
COUNTY OF . NUECES 1f
c ,
ogre me, the undersigned
i= dd to the foregoing instrc
the same for the purposes and conE
therein stated.
Given under my hand and sE
A. D., 1982.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF NUECES.
I, Mrs. Henry E. Gouger, Clerk of the County Court in and for said County, do hereby certify
that the foregoing instrument — — - ----- - --- ------- - -- ---- ------- — ------ ------ ------------ - -
Dated this - - ---- - - - - - OL7 ------ ---- day of_________ - ----- 19 62-, with its certificate of
authentication, was filed for record in my office the --day of- ------- - -- - -- ----- - - - -, 196"
at - -.4 -o clock K, apd duly recorded the ---day of--- 19--"
at -o'clock Record of said
County, in Vol. - -J-6 -�n On Pages - -- - - - - - --------- -
Witness my hand and seal of the County Court of said County at office in Corpus Christ Texas,
the day and year last above writtenL Mrs. Henry E. Gouger,
7' County Clerk, Nueces County.
_, '_� �) �"� — Deputy
B__ I ---- - - - ----
N
I
AN, ASSIGNMENT
HELDENFELS BROTHERS
T7�
TO
r-ITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS QrS
• U-4 --
Ma S.jjf,.NRY E.GOUGER. nty CIA
Nllr-EIS C'oUri'ry' TEY-As
CAMP*LL4/M�PBELL
#TTORNKY� AT
.T.f. .{ —.L Us
L4�-' 7/