HomeMy WebLinkAbout07478 ORD - 02/03/1965JST:vMP:I /28/65
ea
TEXAS:
AN ORDINANCE
CLOSING THE HEARING GIVEN TO THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS
OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE HEREINAFTER NAMED STREETS
IN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, TO -WIT:
1. SOUTHWEST SIDE OF MCARDLE ROAD FROM AYERS
STREET TO CARROLL LANE,
2. NORTHEAST SIDE OF MCARDLE ROAD FROM CARROLL
LANE TO WEBER ROAD AND FROM FRASER SCHOOL
TO VANCE DRIVE,
3. SOUTH SIDE OF CAMPANA STREET FROM CARVER
STREET TO GREENWOOD DRIVE,
4. NORTHEAST SIDE OF GOLLIHAR ROAD FROM AYERS
STREET TO KOSTORYZ ROAD,
5. SOUTH SIDE OF BLOOMINGTON STREET FROM THE
WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF MOLINA JUNIOR HIGH
SCHOOL TO THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF MOLINA
ADDITION, NO. 2;
AS TO THE SPECIAL BENEFITS TO ACCRUE TO SAID PROPERTY -AID
THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF BY VIRTUE OF THE CON- -
STRUCTION OF SIDEWALKS THEREON, AND AS TO ANY ERRORS, IN-
VALIDITIES OR IRREGULARITIES IN ANY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OR
CONTRACT THEREFOR; FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT EACH AND
EVERY PARCEL OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED WILL BE
SPECIALLY BENEFITTED AND ENHANCED IN VALUE IN EXCESS OF THE
AMOUNT OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO BE, AND
AS, ASSESSED AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL
AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT FOR THE
PAYMENT OF A PORTION OF THE COST OF CONSTRUCTING SAID SIDE-
WALKS WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED; FIXING A CHARGE AND LIEN
AGAINST ALL SAID ABUTTING PROPERTIES, AND THE REAL AND TRUE
OWNERS THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE
CERTIFICATES UPON THE COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SAID
IMPROVEMENTS, THE MANNER AND TIME OF PAYMENT THEREOF, AND
PROVIDING FOR THE MANNER AND METHOD OF COLLECTION OF SAID
ASSESSMENTS AND CERTIFICATES; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
SECTION 1. THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
FINDS:
(A) THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS,
HAS HERETOFORE BY ORDINANCE N0. 7455, ENACTED ON THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY,
1965, DETERMINED THE NECESSITY FOR AND ORDERED THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIDE-
WALKS ON THE HEREINAFTER NAMED STREETS IN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS,
TO -WIT:
1. SOUTHWEST SIDE OF MCARDLE ROAD FROM AYERS STREET
TO CARROLL LANE,
2. NORTHEAST S10E OF MCARDLE ROAD FROM CARROLL LANE
TO WEBER ROAD AND FROM FRASER SCHOOL TO VANCE DRIVE,
3. SOUTH SIDE OF CAMPANA STREET FROM CARVER STREET TO
1, GREENWOOD DRIVE,
.4. NORTHEAST SIDE OF GOLLIHAR ROAD FROM AYERS STREET
TO KOSTORYZ ROAD,
y
1,.
val
7478
5- SOUTH SIDE OF BLOOMINGTON STREET FROM THE WEST
BOUNDARY LINE OF MO LI NA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TO THE
A WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF MOLINA ADDITION, N0. 2;
AND IN THE MANNER AND ACCORDING TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS THEREFOR,
WHICH PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE HERETOFORE BEEN APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL.
(B) THAT A NOTICE DULY EXECUTED IN THE NAME OF THE CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI, TEXAS, OF THE ENACTMENT OF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCE HAS BEEN, TO-WIT,
ON THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1965, FILED WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF NUECES COUNTY,
TEXAS, THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI IS SITUATED, AND SUCH
NOTICE HAS BEEN DULY RECORDED IN VOL. 932, PAGE 328, OF THE DEED OF TRUST
RECORDS OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS.
(C) THAT SAID CITY COUNCIL AFTER HAVING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS IN THE
MANNER AS REQUIRED BY LAW AND BY THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
DID AWARD THE CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS TO SLOVAK
BROS., INC. UPON ITS BEST AND LOWEST BID THEREFOR.
(D) THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CAUSED THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO
PREPARE AND FILE ESTIMATES OF THE COSTS OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND ESTIMATES OF
THE AMOUNT PER FRONT FOOT PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE PROPERTY ABUT-
TING EACH OF SAID STREETS WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFINED, AND AGAINST THE
REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF.
`E) THAT UPON THE FILING OF SAID ESTIMATES, THE CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI DID BY ORDINANCE DULY ENACTED ON THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1965, PRO-
VIDE FOR AND ORDER A HEARING TO BE HELD AT 3:00 O'CLOCK P. M., ON THE 27TH
DAY OF JANUARY, 1965, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE CITY HALL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, AT WHICH TIME AND PLACE ALL PERSONS, FIRMS, CORPORATIONS
AND ESTATES OWNING OR CLAIMING ANY SUCH ABUTTING PROPERTY OR ANY INTEREST
THEREIN, AND THEIR AGENTS, AND ATTORNEYS, AND ALL OTHER PERSONS INTERESTED
THEREIN, WERE TO APPEAR AND BE HEARD IN PERSONS OR BY COUNSEL, AND SUCH ORDI-
NANCE DIRECTED THE CITY SECRETARY TO GIVE DUE NOTICE OF SUCH HEARING IN THE
MANNER REQUIRED BY LAW.
(F) THAT AFTER DUE PUBLICATION AS REQUIRED BY LAW, AND ON THE 27TH
DAY OF JANUARY, 1965, AT 3:00 O'CLOCK P. M., SAID PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED
AND HELD IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID ORDINANCE AND NOTICE, AT WHICH TIME AND PLACE
-2-
AN OPPORTUNITY WAS GIVEN TO ALL OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED PARTIES, AGENTS AND
ATTORNEYS TO BE HEARD AND TO OFFER EVIDENCE AS TO ALL MATTERS IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SAID ORDINANCE AND NOTICE, AT WHICH TIME THE FOLLOWING APPEARED AND
TESTIFIED AS FOLLOWS:
a
-3-
ASSESS M E N T R O L L.
h
e:
This sidewalk project, designated Unit I. calls for the construc-
tion of sidewalks along various streets within the City. The
streets involved are as follows:
1. McArdle Road, southwest side, from Ayers Street to
Carroll Lane.
2. McArdle Road, northeast side, from Carroll Lane to Weber
Road and from Fraser school to Vance Drive.
3- Campana.Street, south side, from Carver Street to Green-
wood Drive.
4. Gollihar Road, nort$east'side, from Ayers Street to
Kostoryz Road.
5- Bloomington Street, south side, from west boundary line II
of Molina Junior High School to the west boundary line
of Molina Addition #2.`
The assessment rate for this project was calculated on 80% of E
the unit bid price, thus, $1.78 x 8o% = $1.42 per linear foot.
Consideration was given for side lot adjustment and credit for
existing sidewalk left in place.
Total Construction Cost $32,672.00
Property Owner Assessment 16,363.57 `
TOTAL COST TO CITY $16,308.43
a
Reviped Preliminary
Sheet
SIDEWALKS - MCARDLE ROAD
From Ayers Street to Johnson Street
Zoned & Used R -1 or. R -2,. C.G.. &'Pavement $
1 I [IiAa rpinfn
as per plans and specifications, Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 D.l.f.$
Slovak Bros.' contractor Assessment Rate Sidewalk rer Lft. $
1.42
Assessment Rate Driveway ver sq.-ft- $
Ti.Borden
ER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY
ASSESSED
Lin. Ft.
Company
100 assessed 200.00
70.00
2.
I
i
I 2A
j.
3
j 4
1 5.
I
i
6
f
7
18
i9
i
10
i
Mary Adams.
L. �6, Blk. 1, Nemec Subd.
651t assessed
E. A. Mikulencak
Nemec Annex "A" 65% assessed
Henry M. Hewett
L. 1, Blk. 1, Botsford P1. #1
65% assessed
Marcia Hrissikopoulos
L. 1, Blk. 2, Botsford P1. #1
65% assessed
Henry G. Cheek
L. 1, Blk. 2, Botsford P1. #1
65% assessed
Calvin J. Findeisen
L. 1, Blk. 3, Botsford P1. #1
65% assessed
Antone M. Vidaurri
L. 26, Blk. 3, Botsford P1. #1
65% assessed
Jane C. Martin
L. 1, Blk 4, Botsford Pl. #1
65% assessed
Mark P. Bretton
L. 26, Blk 4, Botsford P1. #2
65% assessed
Hector Owen
L. 1, Blk. 5, Botsford Pl. #S
65% assesse
145.0
(94.25)
137.34
(89.27)
122.35
(79.53)
122.35
(79.53)
122.35
(79.53)
122.35
(79.53)
122.35
(79.53)
125.46
(81.55)
132.00
85.8o)
130.00
t (84.50
DESCRIPTION '
TOT
OF.
RATE AN'0=
• AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT _
i
ASSESSED
Sidewalk'
1.42 284.00
Thicken @ Drwy.
.80 56.00
340:00
Sidewalk
1.42
133.84
126.76
112.93
112.93
112.93
�•
.,
112.93
112.9_
115.8(
u
"
121.81
119.9!
1 ,
Revised preliminary
' - SIDEWALKS - MC ARDLE'ROAD Sheet
From Ayers Street to Johnson Street
4' Wide reinforced concrete sidewalk Zoned & Used R -1 or. R -2,, C.G.. &'Pavement
as per plans and specifications
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 a.l.f.$
Slovak Bros.,'Contractor_. Assessment Rate. Sidewalk per >scrL ft. $ 1.42
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
NJ
ITEM
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
/
AMOUNT
TOTAL
-. AMOUNT
ASSESSED
Lin. Ft.
Sidewalk
1.42
11
Milton G. Hagens
L. 26, Blk. 5, Botsford P1.
130.00
65% assessed
(84.50)
119.99
12
Gloria Rodriques,
L. 1, Blk. 6, Botsford P1. #2
130.00 '
•
65� assessed
(84.50)'
r'
"
119.99
From Ayers
treet to Weber Roa.
13
John E. Gardner
L. 26, Blk '6, Botsford P1. #2
130.00.
65% assessed
(84.50)
Sidewalk
"
119,99
14.
John W. Gummelt
L. 1, Blk. 7, Botsford P1 #2
130.00
65 %,assessed
(84.50
"
"
119.99
15
Fred Barrera
L. 26, Blk 7, Botsford Pl. #2
.130.00
65% assessed
(84.50)
"
-
_
119.99
16
City of Corpus Christi
17
C. C. Ind. School District
18
Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter Day Saints '
L. 7, &,8, Blk K, & L. 8, Blk L
247.5
'�
351.45
EEa N9roa p1,. 100% assesse
19
Wesley Methodist Church
L. 5 thru 8, Blk M. & L.., 7, B
L., Lexington Pl.
247.5
"
n
351.45
100% assessed
20
Velma Mynier
Lots 5,6,7, &8, Blk N.
Lexington Pl. 100% assessed
165.0
At
"
234.30
21
W. H. Stahl
All Block W., Lexington P1.'
100%.assesse
291.5,
"
413.93
Revised PreliAiingry '.
Sheet
' STDEWALKS - M ART)TF ROA71
From Ayers Street to Weber Road
4' Wide reinforced concrete sidewalk Zoned & Used R -1 or R- 2,.C'.G.• &'Pavement $•'.
as per plans and specifications Zoned &Used Other Than R -1 or R -2
Slovak Bros.. Contractor Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per M .Lf+ $ 1.42
Assessment Rate. Driveway per sq. ft
ITEM
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
?
AMOUN
TOTAL
AMOK
ASSESSED
Lin. Ft.'
KO
TORYZ ROAD
22
.
St. Cyril & Methodius Church
Sidewalk.
All Blk 2, Lexington Est.,
except 0 S/E 150'
291.5
n .
1.42
413.93
100% assesag
23
0: J. Jalowdy
L. 6, Blk. 21 Lexington Est.
100% assess
150.0
"
213.00
' 24
Lud Mokry
L. 12, Blk 3, Lexington Est.
100,% assess
152.0
"
215.84
25
Victor C. Marish
L. 13, Blk. 3, Lexington Est.
100% assessec
152.0`'
215.84
26
R. C. Dubose
27
Maria Laughlin 152' of
L. 12 -B, Blk 4, Lexington Est.
`
- 50% assessed
76.0 -
107.92
28
B. M. Whittington
L. 13, Blk 4, Lexington Est.
100% assesse
153.0
"
" .
217.26
29
Jack N. Cobb
L. 12, Blk. 5, Lexington Est.
q
_10 assesse
153.0
217.26
M. C. Kingsley —
L. 13, Blk 5, Lexington Est.
100%'assesse
153.
°
217.26
31
No
L. 12, Blk 61 Lexington Est.
100% assessed
153.0
"
"
217.26
32
R. M. Moore
NIE 70' of L. 13, Blk 6, Lex=
153.0
ington'Est. assessE
d (.107,10.
Preliminary
. •. ' Sheer 4
SIDEWALKS - McARDLE ROAD
From Ayers Street to Weber -Road
4' Wide reinforced concrete sidewalk Zoned & Used R -1 or. R- 2,_C'.G.. &:Pavement $
as per plans and specifications Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 D,l.f.$
Slovak Bros:, Contractor Assessment Rate; Sidewalk ver ML-ft. $1.42
Assessment Rate. Driveway per sq. ft. $
ITEM
DESCRIPTION ''
TOTAL
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
OF
RATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
ASSESSMENT
/
ASSESSED
Lineal Ft.
KOSTO
YZ ROAD
33•
Alvin C. Whitlock
15 3. 0
Sidewalk
N.E. 65' L. 12, B. 7, Lexing-
ton Est. 65% Assess
(99.45)
1:42q
141.22
34
Gene F. Grabbs..
153.0
N.E. 65' L. 13,'B- 7, Lexing-
I '
ton Est. 65% assessed
(99.45)
141.22
35
Jack R. Perry
153.0
N.E. 80' L. 12, B 8, Lexing-
ton Est. 80% assessed
(122.40)
"
173.81
36
C. C. Ind. School Dist
Central Park School 100% Ass-
634.70
- "
"
901.27
essed
37
Elbert L. Fuller
113.60
L. 12,
B. 17 Central Park #3
- (67.25)
"
"
95.50
59.20% assessed
38
Jack Fenner
L. 13, B. 17, Central Park #3
113.50
%
59.20% assessed
(67.19)
"
"
95.41
39
•C. R. North
f
L. 11, B. 18; Central Park #3
113.50
59.20% assessed
(67.19)
95.41 ..
40
Hazel Ross
L. 12, B. 18, Central Pork #3
713.50
59.20 % Assessed
(67.19)
,.
95.41
41
J.' C. Lembka
L. 17, B. lg, Central Park #3
123.50
59.20% Assessed
(67.19)-
"
95.41
42
L.• W. Brunson
L. 1E,
B 19, Central Park #4
113.50 -
59.20% assessed
(67.19)
95.41
t
Preliminary
SIDEWALK - McArdle toad Sheet
.From Ayers Street to Weber Road
4' Wide Reinforced Concrete Sidewalk Zoned & Used R -1 or.R- 2,.C.G.. &'Pavement
as per.plans and specifications
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 .l.f.$
Slovak Bros Contractor Assessment Rate Sidewalk per g ft $1.42
Assessment Rate Drivewav per sq ft $
ITEM
NO.
OWNER .& PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION ''
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
/
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
43
Larry C. Deer
L, 6, B. 20, Central Park #4
113.50.
Sidewalk
1.42
65% assessed
(73.78)
104.77
44
D. H. Veatch
'
L. 7, B. 20 Central Park #4
113.50
65% assessed
(73.78)
104.77
45
Robert S. Smith
L. 10 B. 21, Central Park #4
113.50
65% Assessed
(73.78)
104.77
46
C. E. Clark
L. 11, B. 21, Central Pk. #4
` 113,50
65% assessed
(73.78)
„
„
lo4.77
47
C. E. Harris
L. 9. B. 22, Central Pk. #4
113.50
65% Assessed
(73.78)
104.77
48
Zoe I. Ma.ishall
L. 10, B. 22, Central Pk. #4
113.50
65% Assessed
(73.78)
"
"
104.77
49
N. E. Thames
.L. 9, B. 23, Central Pk. #4
113.50
65% Assessed
(73.780.
"
104.77
50
Marvin W. Smith
L. 10, Blk. 23, Central Park
112.35
#4
(73.03)
„
„
103.70
65% Assessed
51
J. E. Hicks
L.1, B. 1, Cullen P1. #1
100.00'
..76.38 assessed
(76.38)
108.46
e
T
tal
Revised Prdlimtnary •
SIDEWALKS - GOLLIHAR ROAD Sheet No- 6
Ayers to Kostoryz'Road
4' Wide reinforced concrete sidewalks Zoned & Used R -1 or R- 2,.C.G.. &'PaVement $
as per plans and specifications Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 n.l.f.$
Slovak Bros., Contractor Assessment Rate Sidewalk per sa Lf+_ $ 1.42
Assessment Rate. Driveway per sq. ft. $
ITEM
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION ' '
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
52
Sam Susser-
Lineal.Ft.
AYERS STREET
Sidewalk
1.42
L. 16 & 17, Blk 8, Portairs
Zoned other than R.1, or R.2
100% assesse
' 249.50
354.29
53
J. D. Coulter
L. 16, B1k.7, Portairs Add.
11GO
50% assessed
(55.0),
u
78.10
54
I. N. Perkins
j
i
L. 17, Blk 7, portairs Addn.
110.0
50% assessed
(55.0)
"
78.10
55
Royce Milani
L. 16, Blk 6, Portairs Addn
110.0
50% assessed
(55.0)
"
78.10
56
A. H. Sparks
i
�
L. 17 Blk 6, Portairs Addn.
110.0
k
50% assessed
(55.0)
u
" .
78,10
57
John Shipp
L. 16 „Blk 5, Portairs Addn.
110.0
50% assessed
(55.0)
n
78.10
58
Edmond Wessels
L. 17, Blk.5, Portairs Addn
i
& s/w 11.7 of L. 18
110.0
61.70Asse55E
(67,87)
„
96.37 I
59
Avelina Mots,
L. 16, Blk 8, Virginia P1 #2
145;0
50.01% asses
ed, (72.51)
”
"
102.96 .
60'
W. H. Rogers
L. 17, Blk 81 Virginia.pl. #2
136.41
50,01 Assessed
(68.22.)
96.87
61
G. R. Ponce
.
L. 3, Blk 7, $ Virginia P1. #4
130.0
j
50`, Assessed
(65,0)
92.30
i
Revised Breliminary
Sheet 7
STT)WATSM (QTTTT-TAR R()An
Ayers to Kostoryz Rd.
4' Wide reinforced concrete sidewalks Zoned & Used R -1 or.R- 2,.C'.G.,& Pavement $ '•
as per plans and specifications Z d& Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p 1 f-A
one se
Slovak Bros., Contractor Assessment•Rate Sidewalk per KW.Lft. $1.42
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft.
ITEM
N0.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
- DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
- TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
Lineal Ft;
AYERS STREET
'
Sidewalk
62
H. R. Harrod
L. 4, Virginia P1. #4
100% assessed
52.53
1.42
74.59
63
Marston Construction. Co.
S 65.74' X 150' L. 21, Sec. "C"
Paisley Hoffman Subd.
_.
100% assessed
65.74
93.35
64
G. T. Nelson; Jr.
S. 131.59' X 150' L. 6, Tr. "T"
Blk 4, Seca C. Paisley Hoffman
100%,assessed
131,59
186.86
65
Cora F..& Josephine I. Nelson
Paisley Hoffman Tr. S., Sec. C
Blk 4. 100% assessed
122.0
"
"
173.24
66
L. A. Pinson
L. 10, Blk 3, Virginia #2
95.0
65% assessed
(61.75)
87.•69
67:
C. C. Ind. School District
Fannin School 100% assessed
123.08.
"
"
174,77
68
S. C. Campbell
L. 1, Blk 5, Edgewood Pk.
122.70
60% assessed
(73.62),
„
104.54
69
M. L. Jones
L. 1, Blk 1, Christi Pk..
111.28
60% assessed
(66.77)
94.81
70
Gulf Coast Tr. Co. &
L. N. Ladner
L. 36, Blk 2, Christi Pk.
111.28
60% assessed
.•(66,77)
"
„
94.81
71
J. W. Coulbern
L. 1, Blk 2, Christi Pk #2.
111:28
'60%.assessed
(66.77).
� •Revised Preliminary
Sheet k
SIDEWALKS - GOLLIHAR ROAD
Ayers to Kostoryz Rd:"
4' Wide reinforced concrete sidewalks Zoned & "Used R -1 or. R- 2,.C'•G•.& Pavement $ '.
as per plans and specifications
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 �.l.f.$
Slovak Bros., Contractor Assessment Rate. Sidewalk Per t74,L£t. $x-•42
Assessment Rate, Driveway Per sq. ft. $
.TEM
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
or
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
Lineal Ft.
AYERS STREET
T2
k La Rue Wallace
�. 1, Blk 3, Christi Pk. #2
111.28
60% assessed
(66.77)
94.81
73
W. W Tate
L. 1, Blk 1, Tropical Pk. #2
111.13
"
63.26% assess,
(70.36)
",
��
99-91
74
W. J. Deming
..
L. 1, Blk 2, Tropical Pk #2
111.13
63.26% assess
(70.30)
99.83
75
Church ofi God of Prophecy
L. 1, & 2, Hollywd. Ter. Blk 1.
100% assess
115.0
"
163.30
76
J. B. Adams
L. 1 -B Blk 2, Hollwood Ter.
100% assessed
60.28
"
85.60
77
J. B. Adams
L. 1 -C Hollywood Terrace; Blk.
.100% assessed
51.0
"
72.42
78
Travis Davis
L. 1, Blk. 1, Woodcrest Hts:
131.54
50% assessed
(65.77)
.93.39
79
Thos. T. Beck
L. 52 & 53, Blk 2, Woodcrest Ht
. 131.54:
50% Assessed
(65.77)
"
" '
93.39
80
R. R. Brooks
L. 1, Blk. 1, Brookside Add'n.
100% Assessed
116.88
"
165.97
81
M. E. Cassiday
L. 1, Blk 2, Brookside Add'n
100% assessed
116.88,'
"
"
165.97
Revised Preliminary
Sheet
-
Sidewalks GOLLIHAR ROAD
Ayers to Kostoryz Rd..'
4' Wide reinforced concrete sidewalks Zoned & Used R -1 or R- 2,.C.G. & Pavement $ '•
as per plans and specifications Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
4lnvnk Rrns.�Cnntrartnr Assessment Rate Sidewalk per majft. $1.42
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
_TEM
N0.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
' RATE
/
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
Lin. Ft.
AYERS STREET
82
Rose Milford
L. 13 & 14; Blk 2, Brookside Ad
`n.
100 % assessed
147.37:
Sidewalk
1.42
209.27
83
Harold G. Bailey.
'
L. 1;A 2 -B,Ava Cooper
"
106.50
100% assessed
75.0
84
Phillip Doss
Lots 4 -D & 3 -C, Ava Cooper
100% assessed
100
142.00
85
Continental Oil Co.
Lots, all 6,—E & 5E, Ava Cooper
100'% assessed
146.88
"
"
208.57 .
Revised Preliminary
Sheet• 10
SIDEWALKS - CAMPANfI STREET
Greenwood Drive to Carver St.
4' Wide Reinforced concrete•Sidewalks Zoned & Used R -1 or R- 2,.C.G. &.Pavement $.':
.as per plans and specifications Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 n.l.f.$
Slovak Bros., Contractor Assessment Rate, Sidewalk ner ra.Lft. $1.42
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
ITEM
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANRfITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
I OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
Lin. Ft.;
-
Sidewalk
1.42
86
P. A. Martin & L. C. Martin
L. 13, B1 1, Carver Add'n.
•92.6
50% assessed
(46.30)
65.75
87
Travis A. Drake
L. 16, Blk. 1, Carver Add..
92.6
50% assessed
46.30
65.75
88
Owen Jackson
L. 19, Blk 2, Carver Add.
100% aseesse
42.4 ,
"
"
60.21
89
R. D. Walker
.
L. 20 Blk. 2, Carver Add.
100; assesse
42.4
60.21
90
Lee Henderson
L. 21, Blk 2, Carver Add'n
100%i assessed
42.4
"
60.21
91
Alice Thompson
L. 22, Blk 2, Carver Add'n
100% assessed
42.4
"
"
60.21 ,
92
Ernest.Hardeman
.L. 23, Blk. 2, Carver Add'n
100% assessed
42.4.
"
"
60.21
93
Rose Bories
Lots 24 & 25 Blk 2, Carver Add
100% assessed
84.8
"
120.42
94
Sylvia White
L. 26, Blk 2, Carver Add'n
100%.assessed
42.4
"
60.21
95
Dollie Gipson & Mamie Gipson,
L. 27, Blk 2, Carver Addn.
100% assessed
42.4
"
"
60.21
96
Buetta Carroll
L. 28, Blk 2, Carver Add'n
100% assesse
42.4
"
60.21
Revised •Preliminary
, Sheet 11
STT)FWATT,R _ r "'PAT" � tzm
Greenwood Dr. to Carver St.
4' Wide reinforced concrete sidewalks Zoned & Used R -1 or R- 2,.C'.G..& Pavement $.'.
as per plans and specifications
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 i).l.f.$
Assessment Rate. Sidewalk ner scaL ft. $1.42
Assessment Rate. Driveway per sq. ft. $ .
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
OF
RATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
ASSESSMENT
ASSESSED
Lineal Feet
Sidewalks
97
Gleneria Johnson & Alex Cox
L. 29, Blk 2, Carver Add'n
100% Assessed
42.4
"
1.42
60.21
98
Willie Robinson
L, 30,, Blk. 2, Carver
100% assessed
42.4.
128.51
}
• Revised Prylimin. —y
2
SIDEWALKS - BL00 NGTON Sheet
1 a f
• - i
4' w;Aa ra f a Zoned & Used R -1 or, R -2,- C.G..& Pavement $ ':
as per plans and specifications Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R-2 n 1
Slovak_ Bros A
Contractor $
ssessment Rate _Sidewal "at $1 42
Assessment Rate Driveway per sq. ft $
CEM DESCRIPTION '
NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY OF RATE AMOUNT AMOUNT
ASSESSED ASSESSMENT / ASSESSED
Lin. Ft. Molina Jr H'
Blk 5. La Pascua Addn #2 & ..
i9
School•
the abandoned R.O.W. between
99
Elbert Cox, Trustee
Sidewalk
`1,42
103
Coastal Dev. Co. c/o Elbert Co
L. 25, B1k.11, La Pascua #2
114,0
L. 27, Blk 3, La Pascua #2
105
50% assessed
(52.5)
104
Elbert Cox
100
Elbert Cox, Trustee
1
105.71*
50% assessed
L. 27, Blk 9, La Pascua #2-
115.0
Elbert Cox
50% -assessed
(57.5) n
50 assessed
101
Elbert Cox, Trustee
Nicanor Espericuete
E. 40' of E 120' L. 13, Blk 5
L. 26, Blk 9, La Pascua #2.
105;
Molina #2 100% assesse
40.0
07
50% Assessed
(52.5).
E 40' of the W 160' of L. 13
102
West Oso School Dist.
Blk 5, Molina #2 100% assesse
:, 40.0
08
Alston Terry
Hellman School. Lots 14 thru
E. 40' of W 120' of Lot 13
39, Blk. 7; Lots 14 thru 39
40.o
Blk 5. La Pascua Addn #2 & ..
the abandoned R.O.W. between
said lots. 100% assessei
470
103
Coastal Dev. Co. c/o Elbert Co
L. 27, Blk 3, La Pascua #2
105
50% assessed
(52.5)
104
Elbert Cox
L.'26, Blk 3, La pascua #2
105.71*
50% assessed
(52..85)
05
Elbert Cox
L. 26, Blk 1, La Pascua #2 ,
105.71
50 assessed
(52.85)
06
Nicanor Espericuete
E. 40' of E 120' L. 13, Blk 5
Molina #2 100% assesse
40.0
07
Candido De La Garza
E 40' of the W 160' of L. 13
Blk 5, Molina #2 100% assesse
:, 40.0
08
Alston Terry
E. 40' of W 120' of Lot 13
Blk 5, Molina #2. 100% assesse
40.o
Revised Preliminary
-T—
SIDEWALKS - BLOOMINGTON' Sheet 13
Molina Jr H ch - w P /, Mnl;n^
4' Wide reinforced concrete sidg�walks Zoned & Used R -1 or.R- 2,.C'.G..& Pavement $ '.
as per plans and specifications Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 u 1 f.$
Slovak Bros._, Contractor_ Assessment Rate idewa1k Der -Rffrft $1.42
Assessment Rate Driveway per sq. ft $
ITEM
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
Lineal Ft,
109
Theodora Serna
Molina Jr, Hi g
School
Sidewalk rs
1.42
E. 40' of W. 80' L. 13, Blk. 5
Molina #2
100% assesse
40.0
56.80
110
Paul Cox
W. 39.99' of L. '13, Blk 5,
Molina #2 100% assessec
40.0
86.80
111
Anita Martinez
Lots 14 -A, 14 -B, Blk 6
Molina Add. #2 100% assesse
150.0
"
213.00
111-J
Diana Trevino et al
Lot 14 -C, Blk. 6
Molina Add. #2 100% assessed,
50.0
71.00
112
Rufino Salazar
E. 40' of L. 13, Blk 6
Molina #2 100% assessed
40.0
"
56.80
113
Alfredo Ortiz
W. 40' of the E. 80' of L. 13
Blk. 6, Molina #2 100% assessel
40.0
56.80
114•
Gregoria Calderon
E. 40' of W 120' of L. 13,
Blk 6, Molina #2 100%'assessed
40.0
56.80
115
Pantalion F. Castillo & Paul Co
E. 40' of W 80' L. 13, Blk 6
Molina #2 100% assessed
40.0
"
56.80
116
Guadalupe 0. Rios
W. 40' of L. 13, Blk 6'
Molina #2 100 assessed
40.00
9
56.80
117
Manuel Gatica
E 1/2 of L.14, Blk 7
Molina #2 100% assessed
100.0
142.00
118
Manuel Ponce
L. 14 -A, Blk 7, Molina #2
100% assesse
50.
71.00
i
Revised Preliminary
Sheet*
4
SIDEWALKS - BLOW9NGTON
Molina Jr. High .to W. P 1 Molina #2
4' Wide reinforced concrete sidewalks Zoned & Used-R -1 or R- 2,- C.G.,& Pavement $ '•
As per plans and specifications
Zoned _& Used Other Than R -1
Slovak Bros.' Contractor
Assessment Rate Sidewalk ner �m Lft,
ft.
$1.42
$
Assessment Rate Driveway per sq,
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
pF RATE AMOUNT
TOTAL
—AMOUNT
N0. OWNER &PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
ASSESSED ASSESSMENT
ASSESSED
;x.
Lineal Ft. Molina Jr. Hi h Schoo
118= A.
Anselmo Davilla
Sidewalk 1.42
Lot 14 -B, Blk 7, Molina #2
„
71.00
100'% assesse.
50
119 Mercedes A. Ponce -.
E. 50' of L. 13, B1k.7.
71.00
Molina #2 10o% assesse
50
120 Jose Burdiaga
W. 50' of E. loo' of L. 13
„
71.00
Blk 7, Molina #2 100% assesse
50"
121 Valentino Suarez
E. 50' of W 100' of L. 13, Rx
„
71.00
Blk. 7, Molina #2 100% assess
50
122 Eucarnicion Ruiz
W. 50' of L. 13, Blk 7.
71.00
Molina #2 100% assess.
50 .
123 F. D. Betancourt
A11 L. 13, Blk. 8, Molina #2
241.14
100% assess.
170.
To ASSESS ' T
$
6,363.57
Con §traction cost
Property Owner Assessment
32,672.00 .
16 363.57
Total cost to City.
1 ,3 3
City of orpus Christi, Texas t
Regular C cil Meeting
January 27, 65
Page 6
Motion by a Leon, seconded by Wallace and passed that ordinance be
brought forward reflec ing the Council's desire to sell a s• a to the Carmelite
Sisters out of the twenty- ive acre City -owned tract at a intersection of Green-
wood and Horne Roads, for the elocation and expans' n of their nursery facilities,
with the customery protective rest •ctions rely ve to reversionary clause in the
event of abandonment of the project, a ro of the site plan, and the sharing in
the cost of any street pattern involved
Several representatives and embers o the International Longshoremen's
Association, Local 1224 and 122 , protested the us of the City Barge Dock for the
unloading of ships on the b is that it is helping the hip owners to break their
strike, that the trucks re being overloaded in violation both the City and
State Law, that the ives and property of citizens are being a gered by such
overloading, a that such use of Shoreline Boulevard will tear up a streets.
The matter as discussed at length with respect to whether the City is roviding
a servi a with the City Dock that is not needed, and the possible closing the
doe and moving to another site.
Mayor Barnard stated that the Council would discuss this matter and the
possibility of taking action in regard to the City Dock facility following the
scheduled hearing on sidewalk assessments.
Mayor Barnard announced the public hearing on Assessments for Sidewalk
Improvements on McArdle, Campana, Gollihar and Bloomington Streets.
Jack Graham, Director of Public Works, described the plans and extent of
the proposed sidewalk improvements on the foregoing streets in the areas which
lead to and from public schools with a sizeable amount of pedestrian traffic; ex-
plained the total cost of the project, the portion to be assessed against the
abutting property owners, and that to be paid by the City, and the method by
which the pro rata share was °computed.
r
Harold Carr te
fe
stified as`tokhis *background and experieneb,Vhich ge lt
K
qualified him as'a real estate *AppraisETr for allitypes of properties in this City
w
and County; testified that he had personally viewed and unddrstood the extent and
specifications of the proposed improvements; that he had personally viewed the
preliminary assessment roll and each of the properties to be assessed; and that
R a
•
City of Corpus Christi, Texas
Regular Council Meeting
January 27, 1965
Page 7
in his opinion, each of the properties so assessed would be enhanced in value at
least to the extent of the proposed assessments.
The following asked questions about the position of certain survey stakes,
the bond issue recently voted for this improvement, and the manner and time when
Payment for the assessments were due and payable;
Mrs, Henry M. Hewett, Lot 1, Block 1, Botsford Place #1; Victor C. Marish,
Lot 13, Block 3, Lexington Estates; Willie Robinson, Lot 30, Block 2, Carver; and
Marvin W. Smith, Lot 10, Block 23; Central Park #4.
It was explained that there were found to be a number of encroachments,
Particularly along McArdle, but that there is the possibility of some sort of flex-
ibility of moving the right of way forward or backward to comply with the subdivi-
sion plats; that the amount of bond issue recently voted for this project was for
the City's portion of the cost only; and that payment for assessments is not re-
quested until completion and acceptance by the City of the entire project.
City Manager Whitney reported that he had received word from a citizens'
group for neighborhood improvement in Molina Addition, that they had held a meet-
ing last week in regard to these improvements on Bloomington, and went on record
as heartily endorsing this project and concurring in the value of it.
No one else appeared to be heard.
Motion by Wallace, seconded by de Leon and passed that the hearing be
closed, and that an ordinance be brought forward adopting the assessment roll and
awarding the contract for the construction of the improvements.
THERE BEING NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT WHO DESIRED TO BE HEARD, THE
MAYOR ANNOUNCED THAT THE HEARING WAS CLOSED AND DIRECTED THE CITY ATTORNEY
TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE INCORPORATING THE FINDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL WHEN
MADE.
(G) THAT AT SAID HEARING NO PROTESTS, OBJECTIONS OR TESTIMONY WERE
OFFERED AS TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS THE CONTRACTS OR ASSESSMENTS THEREFORE OR AS
TO ANY OF THE PROCEEDINGS IN REFERENCE THERETO EXCEPT AS HEREINABOVE SET OUT;
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HAS HEARD ALL PARTIES WHO APPEARED AND DESIRED TO BE
HEARD AS TO THE SPECIAL BENEFITS IN ENHANCED VALUE TO ACCRUE TO SAID ABUTTING
PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF AS COMPARED TO THE PORTION OF
THE COSTS OF CONSTRUCTING SAID IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST
SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY, AND HAS HEARD ALL PARTIES APPEARING AND OFFERING
TESTIMONY TOGETHER WITH ALL OBJECTIONS AND PROTESTS RELATIVE TO SUCH MATTERS
AND RELATIVE TO ANY ERRORS, INVALI DITIES OR IRREGULARITIES IN ANY OF THE PRO-
CEEDINGS FOR SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND HAS GIVEN A FULL AND FAIR HEARING TO ALL
PARTIES MAKING OR DESIRING TO MAKE ANY SUCH PROTEST OR OBJECTION OR TO OFFER
TESTIMONY, AND HAS FULLY EXAMINED AND CONSIDERED ALL OF SAID EVIDENCE, MATTERS,
TESTIMONY AND OBJECTIONS OFFERED.
(H) THAT BASED ON THE EVIDENCES MATTERS, TESTIMONY AND OBJECTIONS
CONSIDERED AT SUCH HEARING THE SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPERTIES AND EACH AND EVERY PARCEL OF SUCH PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID
ALLEY WILL BE ENHANCED IN VALUE AND SPECIALLY BENEFITED IN AN AMOUNT IN EXCESS
'OF THE AMOUNT OF THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO BED AND AS HEREIN-
AFTER, ASSESSED AGAINST EACH OF SAID PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID
ALLEYS AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF.
(1) THAT SAID CITY COUNCIL IS OF THE OPINION, AND FINDS THAT EXCEPT
AS MAY BE VARIED THEREFROM IN THE ASSESSMENTS SET OUT IN SECTION 4 BELOW THE
FRONT FOOT PLAN OR RULES IF UNIFORMLY APPLIED WOULD NOT RESULT IN INJUSTICES
AND INEQUITIES BETWEEN THE DIFFERENT PARCELS OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE SAME UNIT
TO WHICH SAID PLAN OR RULE IS HEREBY APPLIED THAT IN EACH OF THE CASES WHERE
THE ASSESSMENT SET OUT IN SECTION 4 BELOW HAS BEEN VARIED FROM THE FRONT FOOT
PLAN OR RULE, SAID CITY COUNCIL IS OF THE OPINIONS AND FINDS, THAT SAID PLAN
IF UNIFORMLY APPLIED WOULD RESULT IN INJUSTICES AND INEQUITIES BETWEEN THE
•
DIFFERENT PARCELS OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE SAME UNIT; AND THE CITY COUNCIL HAS
DETERMINED TO APPORTION AND ASSESSES THE COSTS IN A DIFFERENT MANNER IN SUCH
PROPORTIONS AS IT DEEMS AND FINDS TO BE JUST AND EQUITABLE, HAVING IN VIEW
THE SPECIAL BENEFITS TO THE ENHANCED VALUE OF THE PROPERTIES.
(J) THAT SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS ADOPTED THE RULE OF APPORTIONMENT
AND DIVISION OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN SAID ABUTTING PROPER-
TIES AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF HEREIN SET FORTH AND HAS FOUND
THE SAME TO BE JUST AND EQUITABLE AND TO PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL EQUALITY CON-
SIDERING THE BENEFITS TO BE RECEIVED AND THE BURDENS IMPOSED THEREBY; AND
SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS FURTHER FOUND UPON THE EVIDENCE CONSIDERED THAT THE
ASSESSMENTS HEREINAFTER MADE AND THE CHARGES HEREBY DECLARED AGAINST SAID
ABUTTING PROPERTIES AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF ARE JUST AND
EQUITABLE AND THAT ALL OBJECTIONS AND PROTESTS SHOULD BE OVERRULED AND DENIED.
SECTION 2. THERE BEING NO FURTHER PROTESTS' OR TESTIMONY FOR OR
AGAINST OR IN REFERENCE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS BENEFITS OR PROCEEDINGS, SAID
HEARING GRANTED TO THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF PROPERTIES ABUTTING UPON
SAID STREETS OR UNITS, WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFINED AND ALL PERSONS
FIRMS3 CORPORATIONS AND,ESTATES, OWNING OR CLAIMING SAME OR ANY INTEREST
THEREIN, SHALL BE, AND THE SAME IS HEREBY CLOSED, AND ALL PROTESTS AND OB-
JECTIONS WHETHER SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED OR NOT, SHALL BE AND THE SAME ARE
HEREBY OVERRULED AND DENIED.
SECTION 3. THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES UPON THE'
EVIDENCE HEARD IN REFERENCE TO EACH AND EVERY PARCEL OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON
THE SAID STREETS AND UNITS HEREIN SET OUT THAT THE ENHANCEMENT IN VALUE TO
ACCRUE TO SAID PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF BY VIRTUE OF THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SAID SIDEWALKS WILL BE IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT OF THE COSTS
OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO BE, AND AS HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST SAID ABUT-
TING PROPERTIES AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF; AND FINDS THAT THE
APPORTIONMENT OF THE COSTS OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND THE ASSESSMENTS HEREIN -
BELOW MADE ARE JUST AND EQUITABLE AND PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL EQUALITY CONSIDER-
ING THE BENEFITS RECEIVED AND THE BURDENS IMPOSED THEREBY AND ARE IN ACCORD-
ANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS AND THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY; AND .
-5-
•
FURTHER FINDS THAT ALL PROCEEDINGS AND CONTRACTS HERETOFORE HAD WITH REFERENCE
TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ALL RESPECTS REGULAR, PROPER AND VALID, AND THAT
ALL PREREQUISITES TO THE FIXING OF THE ASSESSMENT LIENS AGAINST SAID ABUTTING
PROPERTIES, AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED, AND THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE REAL
AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, WHETHER NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN OR NOT, HAVE
BEEN IN ALL THINGS REGULARLY HAD AND PERFORMED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW AND
THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID CITY COUNCIL.
SECTION 4. IN PURSUANCE OF SAID ORDINANCE DULY ENACTED BY SAID CITY
COUNCIL AUTHORIZING AND ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID SIDEWALKS AS HEREIN -
BELOW SET OUT, WHICH ORDINANCE WAS PASSED, AS AFORESAID ON THE 13TH DAY OF
JANUARY, 1965, AND IN PURSUANCE OF SAID PROCEEDINGS HERETOFORE HAD AND ENACTED
BY SAID CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND BY VIRTUE OF THE
POWERS VESTED IN SAID CITY WITH RESPECT TO SAID SIDEWALK= IMPROVEMENTS BY THE
LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO CHAPTER t06, ACTS
OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE 40TH LEGISLATURE, KNOWN AS ARTICLE 11058,
VERNON'S TEXAS CIVIL STATUTES, AS AMENDED, AND ARTICLE IX, SECTION 6 OF THE
CHARTER OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THERE SHALL BE, AND IS HEREBY
LEVIED, ASSESSED AND TAXED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY HEREIN-
AFTER DESCRIBED AND ABUTTING UPON THE SAID STREETS AND UNITS HEREINAFTER SET
OUT AND WITHIN THE LIMITS BELOW DEFINED AND AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS
OF SUCH PROPERTY WHETHER SUCH REAL AND TRUE OWNERS BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY
NAMED, OR SAID PROPERTIES BE CORRECTLY DESCRIBED HEREIN OR NOT, THE SEVERAL
SUMS OF MONEY HEREINAFTER MENTIONED AND ITEMIZED OPPOSITE THE DESCRIPTION OF
THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF SAID PROPERTY, THE NUMBER OF FRONT FEET OF EACH,
AND THE SEVERAL AMOUNTS ASSESSED AGAINST SAME AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS
THEREOF, AND THE NAMES -OF THE APPARENT OWNERS THEREOF, ALL AS CORRECTED AND
ADJUSTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, BEING AS FOLLOWS, TO -WIT:'
-6-
SECTION 5. THE ASSESSMENTS LEVIED IN SECTION 4 ABOVE ARE FOR A
PORTION OF THE COSTS OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS IN THE STREETS AND UNITS THEREIN
SET OUT, AND THE ASSESSMENTS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS IN SAID UNITS ARE IN NO-
WISE RELATED T0, OR CONNECTED WITH, THE IMPROVEMENTS OR ASSESSMENTS IN ANY
OTHER OF THE STREETS OR UNITS DESCRIBED IN SAID ORDINANCE OR EACH OTHER;
AND IN LEVYING SAID ASSESSMENTS THE AMOUNT SO ASSESSED FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS
IN SAID UNITS HAVE BEEN IN NOWISE AFFECTED BY ANY FACT OR THING IN ANY WAY
CONNECTED WITH THE IMPROVEMENTS OR THE ASSESSMENTS THEREFOR IN ANY OTHER OF
SAID UNITS. THE OMISSION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS IN ANY OF SAID STREETS OR UNITS
AS A WHOLE SHALL IN NOWISE AFFECT NOR, IMPAIR THE VALIDITY OF THE ASSESSMENTS
IN ANY OTHER OF SAID UNITS AND THE OMISSION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS IN ANY PAR-
TICULAR STREET OR UNIT IN FRONT OF ANY PARCEL OF PROPERTY EXEMPT FROM THE
LIEN OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS OR AGAINST WHICH A VALID PROPERTY ASSESSMENT CANNOT
BE LEVIED, SHALL IN NOWISE AFFECT NOR IMPAIR THE VALIDITY OF THE ASSESSMENTS
AGAINST THE OTHER PROPERTIES IN SUCH UNIT.
SECTION 6. THE SEVERAL SUMS MENTIONED ABOVE IN SECTION 4 HEREOF,
ASSESSED AGAINST SAID PARCELS OF ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE
OWNERS OR OWNER THEREOF, WHETHER SAID OWNERS BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED, OR
SAID PROPERTIES BE CORRECTLY DESCRIBED HEREIN OR NOT, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST
THEREON AT THE RATE OF FIVE PERCENT (5 %) PER ANNUM AND WITH REASONABLE ATTOR-
NEY'S FEES AND ALL COSTS AND EXPENSE OF COLLECTION, IF INCURRED, ARE HEREBY
DECLARED TO BE AND MADE A FIRST AND PRIOR LIEN UPON THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF
PROPERTY AGAINST WHICH SAME ARE ASSESSED FROM AND AFTER THE DATE SAID IMPROVE-
MENTS WERE ORDERED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, AND A PERSONAL LIABILITY AND CHARGE
AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF WHETHER OR NOT SUCH OWNER
OR OWNERS BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN, PARAMOUNT AND SUPERIOR TO ALL
OTHER LIENS CLAIMS OR TITLES EXCEPT FOR LAWFUL AD VALOREM TAXES; AND THAT
THE SUMS SO ASSESSED SHALL BE PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, OR ITS
ASSIGNS, IN MONTHLY INSTALLMENTS OF NOT EXCEEDING TWENTY -FOUR (21I) IN NUMBER
SAID PAYMENTS TO BE MADE AT THE CITY HALL IN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS THE FIRST OF WHICH SHALL BE PAYABLE WITHIN THIRTY (30)
DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE COMPLETION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND THEIR ACCEPT-
ANCE BY THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ONE INSTALLMENT SHALL BE PAYABLE EACH
-7-
MONTH THEREAFTER UNTIL SAID ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN PAID IN FULL, INCLUDING
INTEREST THEREON AT THE RATE OF FIVE PERCENT (5) PER ANNUM FROM AND AFTER
THE DATE OF SAID COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCES PAST DUE PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST
TO BEAR INTEREST AT THE SAME RATE PER ANNUM UNTIL PAID, SO THAT UPON THE
COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE BY SAID CITY COUNCIL OF THE IMPROVEMENTS IN -ANY
UNIT OR PORTION OF STREET ABOVE DEFINED, THE ASSESSMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTY
ABUTTING UPON SUCH COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED UNIT SHALL BE AND BECOME DUE AND
PAYABLE IN INSTALLMENTS AS PROVIDED. PROVIDED HOWEVER THE OWNER OR OWNERS
OF ANY SUCH PROPERTY SHALL HAVE THE PRIVILEGE OF PAYING ALL OR ANY OF SAID INSTALL-
MENT TOGETHER WITH INTEREST ACCRUED THEREON DOWN TO THE DATE OF PAYMENT; AND
PROVIDED FURTHER THAT THE OWNER OR OWNERS OF ANY SUCH PROPERTY MAY PAY THE
TOTAL OF SUCH ASSESSMENT WITHOUT INTEREST WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER THE
COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS. IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN
THE PAYMENT OF ANY INSTALLMENT OF PRINCIPAL OR INTERESTS PROMPTLY WHEN DUES
THEN AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, OR ITS ASSIGNS THE ENTIRE
AMOUNT OF SAID ASSESSMENT UPON WHICH DEFAULT IS MADE, TOGETHER WITH REASONABLE
ATTORNEYS FEES AND ALL COSTS AND EXPENSES OF COLLECTIONS IF INCURRED, SHALL
BE AND BECOME IMMEDIATELY DUE AND PAYABLE.
SECTION 7. IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY OF SAID
SUMS HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST THE SAID PARCELS OF PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND
TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF COLLECTION THEREOF SHALL BE ENFORCED) AT THE
OPTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, OR ITS ASSIGNS EITHER BY SUIT IN ANY
COURT HAVING JURISDICTION, OR BY SALE OF THE PROPERTY ASSESSED AS NEARLY AS
POSSIBLE IN THE MANNER AS MAY BE PROVIDED BY LAW IN FORCE IN SAID CITY FOR THE
COLLECTION OF AD VALOREM TAXES.
SECTION S. FOR THE PURPOSE OF EVIDENCING SAID ASSESSMENTS THE LIENS
SECURING SAME AND THE SEVERAL. SUMS ASSESSED AGAINST THE SAID PARCELS OF PROPERTY
AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF AND THE TIME AND TERMS OF PAY-
MENT, AND AID IN THE ENFORCEMENT THEREOF, ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES SHALL BE
ISSUED BY THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI TEXAS TO THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
UPON THE COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SAID SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS IN ANY UNIT
OR PORTION OF STREET ABOVE DEFINED, WHICH CERTIFICATES SHALL BE EXECUTED BY
51
THE MAYOR IN THE NAME OF THE CITY, ATTESTED BY THE CITY SECRETARY WITH THE
CORPORATE SEALS AND WHICH SHALL DECLARE THE AMOUNTS OF SAID ASSESSMENTS AND
THE TIMES AND TERMS THEREOF, THE RATE OF INTEREST THEREON, THE DATE OF THE
COMPLETION AND THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR WHICH THE CERTIFICATE
IS ISSUED; AND SHALL CONTAIN THE NAME OF THE APPARENT OWNER OR OWNERS AS
ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY ASSESSED BY LOT
AND BLOCK NUMBER OR FRONT FOOT THEREOF OR SUCH OTHER DESCRIPTIONS AS MAY
OTHERWISE IDENTIFY THE SAME AND IF THE SAID PROPERTY SHALL BE OWNED BY AN
ESTATE OR FIRMS THEN TO SO STATE THE FACT SHALL BE SUFFICIENT AND NO ERROR
OR MISTAKE IN DESCRIBING ANY SUCH PROPERTY OR IN GIVING THE NAME OF ANY OWNER
OR OWNERS OR OTHERWISE, SHALL IN ANYWISE INVALIDATE OR IMPAIR THE ASSESSMENT
LEVIED HEREBY OR THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED IN EVIDENCE THEREOF.
THE SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL FURTHER PROVIDE SUBSTANTIALLY THAT IF
DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY INSTALLMENT OF PRINCIPAL OR
INTEREST WHEN DUE, THEN AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, OR ITS
ASSIGNS OR THE HOLDER THEREOF THE WHOLE OF SAID ASSESSMENT EVIDENCED THEREBY
SHALL AT ONCE BECOME DUE AND PAYABLE AND SHALL BE COLLECTIBLE WITH REASONABLE
ATTORNEY'S FEES AND ALL EXPENSES AND COSTS OF COLLECTION, IF INCURRED; AND
SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL SET FORTH AND EVIDENCE THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE
REAL AND "TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS OF SUCH PROPERTY, WHETHER NAMED OR CORRECTLY
NAMED THEREIN OR NOT, AND THE LIEN UPON SUCH PROPERTY, AND THAT SAID LIEN IS
FIRST AND PARAMOUNT THEREON SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER LIENS, TITLES AND CHARGES
EXCEPT FOR LAWFUL AD VALOREM TAXES FROM AND AFTER THE DATE SAID IMPROVEMENTS
WERE ORDERED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, AND SHALL PROVIDE IN EFFECT, THAT IF DE-
FAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT THEREOF THE SAME MAY BE ENFORCED AT THE
OPTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI OR ITS ASSIGNS EITHER BY THE SALE OF
THE PROPERTY THEREIN DESCRIBED IN THE MANNER PROVIDED FOR THE COLLECTION OF
AD VALOREM TAXES AS ABOVE RECITED, OR BY SUIT IN ANY COURT HAVING JURISDICTION.
SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL FURTHER RECITE IN EFFECT THAT ALL THE PRO-
CEEDINGS WITH REFERENCE TO MAKING SAID IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN REGULARLY HAD
IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW IN FORCE IN SAID CITY AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF SAID CITY AND THAT ALL PREREQUISITES TO THE FIXING OF THE ASSESS-
MENT LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY AND THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE REAL AND
1 _^_
TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, EVIDENCED BY SUCH CERTIFICATES, HAVE BEEN REGU-
LARLY DONE AND PERFORMED WHICH RECITALS SHALL BE EVIDENCE OF ALL THE MATTERS
a AND FACTS SO RECITED, AND NO FURTHER PROOF THEREOF SHALL BE REQUIRED IN ANY
COURT.
SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL FURTHER PROVIDE IN EFFECT THAT THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, SHALL EXERCISE ALL OF ITS LAWFUL POWERS, WHEN REQUESTED
Y
SO TO DO BY THE HOLDER OF SAID CERTIFICATES, TO AID IN THE ENFORCEMENT AND
COLLECTION THEREOF, AND SAID CERTIFICATES MAY CONTAIN OTHER AND FURTHER RE-
CITALS PERTINENT AND APPROPRIATE THERETO. IT SHALL NOT BE NECESSARY THAT
SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL BE IN THE EXACT FORM AS ABOVE SET FORTH, BUT THE
SUBSTANCE AND EFFECT THEREOF SHALL SUFFICE.
SECTION 9. ALL SUCH ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ARE, AND SHALL BE A PERSONAL
LIABILITY AND CHARGE AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS OF
SAID ABUTTING PROPERTIES, NOTWITHSTANDING SUCH OWNER OR OWNERS MAY NOT BE NAMED
OR CORRECTLY NAMED, AND ANY IRREGULARITY IN THE NAME OF THE PROPERTY OWNER,
OR THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY PROPERTY OR THE AMOUNT OF ANY ASSESSMENTS OR IN ANY
OTHER MATTER OR THING SHALL NOT IN ANYWISE INVALIDATE OR IMPAIR ANY ASSESSMENT
LEVIED HEREBY OR ANY CERTIFICATE ISSUED AND ANY SUCH MISTAKE, OR ERROR,
INVALIDITY OR IRREGULARITY WHETHER IN SUCH ASSESSMENT OR IN THE CERTIFICATES
ISSUED IN EVIDENCE THEREOF MAY BED BUT IS NOT REQUIRED TO BED IN ORDER TO BE
ENFORCEABLE, CORRECTED AT ANY TIME BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI TEXAS.
THE TOTAL AMOUNTS ASSESSED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY
ABUTTING UPON THE UNITSCOR PORTIONS OF STREETS ABOVE SET OUTS AND THE REAL AND
TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF ARE THE SAME, OR LESS THANE THE ESTIMATES OF SAID
ASSESSMENTS PREPARED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED
BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, AND ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID CITY
RELATIVE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS THEREFORE AND WITH THE TERMS
POWERS AND PROVISIONS OF SAID CHAPTER 106 OF THE ACTS OF THE FIRST CALLED
SESSION OF THE 40TH LEGISLATURE, KNOWN AS ARTICLE 1105B, VERNON'S TEXAS CIVIL
STATUTES, AS AMENDED AND ARTICLE IX, SECTION 6 OF THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY,
UNDER WHICH TERMS, PROVISIONS AND POWERS OF SAID ACTS SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND
Im
0
ASSESSMENTS WERE HAD AND MADE BY SAID CITY COUNCIL.
SECTION 10. THE IMPORTANCE TO THE PUBLIC OF DETERMINING THE ASSESS-
MENTS AGAINST PROPERTY OWNERS AND THEREBY ENABLING CONSTRUCTION TO PROCEED
AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE CREATES A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND AN IMPERATIVE PUBLIC
NECESSITY REQUIRING THE SUSPENSION OF THE CHARTER RULE THAT NO ORDINANCE OR
RESOLUTION SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE OF ITS INTRODUCTION AND THAT
SUCH ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE SEVERAL MEETINGS OF THE
CITY COUNCIL, AND THE MAYOR, HAVING DECLARED THAT SUCH EMERGENCY AND NECESSITY
EXIST, HAVING REQUESTED THAT SUCH CHARTER RULE BE SUSPENDED AND THAT THIS ORDI-
NANCE BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE OF ITS INTRODUCTION AND TAKE EFFECT AND BE
IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT FROM AND AFTER ITS PASSAGE, IT IS ACCORDINGLY SO OR-
DAINED, THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1965-
ATTEST:
MAYORS "
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LE L FORM THIS
3 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1965:
CITY ATTORNEY //
•
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
J-1 AY OF �➢ 19 l _
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE OF THE,FOR_E_-
GOING ORDINANCE, A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND IMPERATIVE NECESSITY EXIST FOR
THE SUSPENSION OF THE CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT THAT NO ORDINANCE OR
RESOLUTION SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED, AND THAT
SUCH ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE MEETINGS OF THE CITY
COUNCIL; I, THEREFORE, HEREBY REQUEST THAT YOU SUSPEND SAID CHARTER RULE
OR REQUIREMENT AND PASS THIS ORDINANCE FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRO -
DUCED, OR AT THE PRESENT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
RESPECTFULLY,
i '
�+� i
MAYOR -
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
THE CHARTER RULE WAS SUSPENDED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
JAMES L. BARNARD
.JAMES H. YOUNG
JACK R. BLACKMON
JOSE R. DELEON
M. P. MALDONADO
W. J. ROBERTS
W. H. WALLACE, JR.
THE ABOVE ORDINANCE WAS PASSED BY THE FOLL NGiVOTE:
JAMES L. BARNARD
JAMES H. Your+c
JACK R. BLACKMON
JOSE R. DELEON
M. P. MALDONADO
W. J. RDBERTS
W. H. WALLACE, JR. p