HomeMy WebLinkAbout07714 ORD - 09/08/1965k 9/7/65 .
AN ORDINANCE
CLOSING THE HEARING GIVEN TO THE REAL AND TRUE,OWNERS OF
PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON COMANCHE STREET FROM PORT AVENUE
TO PALM DRIVE;,BLUNTZER STREET FROM'PORT AVENUE TO
COMANCHE STREET; PALM DRIVE FROM COMANCHE STREET TO
LIPAN STREET; BEACH AVENUE FROM U. S. HIGHWAY 181-,,TO
TIMON; PUEBLO STREET FROM BALDWIN BOULEVARD TO PINE.
STREET; AND FIFTEENTH STREET FROM BALDWIN BOULEVARD.TO'
CRAIG STREET; AS TO THE SPECIAL - BENEFITS TO ACCRUE TO n '
SAID PROPERTY AND THE.REAL'AND TRUE OWNERS THEkEOF'BY
VIRTUE OF'THE�IMPROVEMENTS OF SAID STREETS WITHIN THE',
LIMITS DEFINED, AND AS TO ANY ERRORS, AND INVALIDITIES
OR IRREGULARITIES IN ANY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OR CONTRACT
a THEREOF„ OVERRULING AND DENYING ALL PROTESTS AND OB-
JECTIONS OFFERED, EXCEPT THE CHANGES REFLECTED HEREIN,
FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON
.SAID STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, WILL BE SPECIALLY,
BENEFITTED AND ENHANCED IN VALUE IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT
OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO BE AND AS
HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST SAID PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID
STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, AND LEVYING AN ASSESS -
MENT FOR THE PAYMENT OF A PORTION OF THE COST OF IMPROVE-
MENTS ON SAID STREETS, WITHIN SA'ID•LIMITS, FIXING A CHARGE
AND LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREETS
AND THE REAL`AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, PROVIDING FOR THE
ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES UPON THE COMPLETION
AND ACCEPTANCE OF SAID WORK, THE MANNER AND TIME OF PAY-
MENT AND PROVIDING THE MANNER AND METHOD OF COLLECTION
OF SAID ASSESSMENTS AND CERTIFICATES; AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS,
BYp DULY ENACTED ORDINANCE PASSED AND APPROVED ON AUGUST 18, 1965; NUMBERED
7682, DETERMINED THE NECESSITY FOR, AND ORDERED THE IMPROVEMENTS OF COMANCHE
STREET FROM PORT AVENUE TO PALM'DRIVE; BLUNTZER STREET FROM PORT AVENUE TO
COMANCHE STREET; PALM DRIVE FROM COMANCHE STREET TO LIPAN STREET; BEACH
AVENUE FROM U. S. HIGHWAY 181 TO TIMON; PUEBLO STREET FROM BALDWIN BOULEVARD
TO PINE STREET; AND FIFTEENTH STREET FROM BALDWIN BOULEVARD TO CRAIG STREET,
WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREINAFTER DEFINED, IN THE MANNER AND ACCORDING TO THE
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS HER ,ETOFORE APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
r
BY ORDINANCE NO. 7642, DATED JULY 21, 1965, SAID STREETS TO BE IMPROVED
BEING AS FOLLOWS, TO -WIT:
COMANCHE STREET FROM PORT AVENUE TO PALM DRIVE;
BLUNTZER STREET FROM PORT AVENUE TO COMANCHE STREET;
PALM DRIVE FROM COMANCHE STREET TO LIPAN STREET;
BEACH AVENUE FROM U.S. HIGHWAY 181 TO TIMON BOULEVARD;
PUEBLO STREET FROM BALDWIN BOULEVARD TO PINE STREET; AND
•- FIFTEENTH STREET FROM BALDWIN BOULEVARD TO CRAIG STREET;
A DULY EXECUTED NOTICE OF SAID ORDINANCE HAVING BEEN FILED IN THE NAME OF
SAID C.LTY WITH THE COUNTYCLERK OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS; AND
a 7714
N
WHEREAS, SAID CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS,
AFTER HAVING ADVERTISED FOR AND RECEIVED BIDS ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID
IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE LENGTH OF TIME AND IN THE MANNER AND FORM AS REQUIRED
BY THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY AND THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, AND AFTER
HAVING DULY AND REGULARLY MADE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR SUCH
PURPOSE TO COVER THE ESTIMATED COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID CITY, ALL
AS PROVIDED BY THE CORPUS CHRISTI CITY CHARTER AND BY LAW, DID AWARD A
CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS TO WOMACK & MANNING ON
THEIR LOWEST AND MOST ADVANTAGEOUS BID AND SAID CONTRACT HAS BEEN HERETO-
FORE DULY EXECUTED BY SAID CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND WOMACK &. MANNING AND
IS DATED JULY 21, 1965, AND THE PERFORMANCE BOND REQUIRED BY SAID CONTRACT
HAS BEEN PROPERLY FURNISHED BY SAID WOMACK &. MANNING AND ACCEPTED BY SAID
CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY AS TO FORM AND AMOUNT AS REQUIRED BY THE CHARTER
OF SAID CITY AND THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS; AND,
WHEREAS, THE SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS CAUSED THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
WORKS TO PREPARE AND FILE ESTIMATES OF THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND
ESTIMATES OF THE AMOUNT PER FRONT FOOT AND PER SQUARE FOOT PROPOSED TO
BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE AFOREMENTIONED STREETS,
WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFINED, TO BE IMPROVED, AND THE REAL AND TRUE
OWNERS THEREOF, AND SAID DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS HAS HERETOFORE FILED
SAID ESTIMATES AND A STATEMENT OF OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO WITH SAID
CITY COUNCIL, AND SAME HAS BEEN RECEIVED, EXAMINED AND APPROVED BY SAID
CITY COUNCIL; AND,
WHEREAS, SAID CITY COUNCIL, BY DULY ENACTED ORDINANCE DATED
AUGUST 18, 1965, DID DETERMINE THE NECESSITY OF LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT FOR
THAT PORTION OF THE COST OF CONSTRUCTING SAID IMPROVEMENTS ON THE AFORE-
MENTIONED STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFINED, TO BE PAID BY THE
ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND DID ORDER AND
SET A HEARING TO BE HELD AT 3:00 O'CLOCK ON SEPTEMBER 1, 1965, IN THE
COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CITY HALL OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, FOR THE REAL
NANO TRUE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREET, WITHIN THE
LIMITS ABOVE DEFINED, AND FOR ALL OTHERS OWNING OR CLAIMING ANY INTEREST
IN OR OTHERWISE INTERESTED IN SAID PROPERTY, OR ANY OF SAID MATTERS AS
-2-
I
TO THE ASSESSMENTS AND AMOUNTS TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PARCEL OF
ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AND AS
TO THE SPECIAL BENEFITS TO ACCRUE TO SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY BY VIRTUE OF
SAID IMPROVEMENTS IF ANY OR CONCERNING ANY ERRORS INVALIDITY IRREGU-
LARITY OR DEFICIENCY IN ANY PROCEEDINGS OR CONTRACTS TO APPEAR AND BE
HEARD IN PERSON OR BY COUNSEL AND OFFER EVIDENCE IN REFERENCE TO SAID
MATTERS; AND SAID CITY COUNCIL DID BY SAID ORDINANCE ORDER AND DIRECT
THE CITY SECRETARY TO GIVE. NOTICE OF SAID HEARING TO THE REAL AND TRUE
OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREETS WITHIN THE LIMITS DE-
FINED, BY PUBLICATION IN THE CORPUS CHRISTI TIMES, THE OFFIJIAL NEWSPAPER
OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, A NEWSPAPER PUBLISHED IN THE CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI TEXAS OF GENERAL CIRCULATION, SAID NOTICE TO BE PUBLISHED IN
SAID NEWSPAPER AT LEAST THREE TIMES PRIOR TO THE DATE OF SAID HEARING] THE
FIRST PUBLICATION OF WHICH TO BE AT LEAST TEN (10) DAYS PRIOR THERETO, ALL
AS PROVIDED FOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SAID CITY CHARTER AND
OF CHAPTER 106 OF THE ACTS OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE 40TH LEGIS-
LATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS KNOWN AND SHOWN AS ARTICLE 1105 -B OF VERNON'S
ANNOTATED CIVIL STATUTES OF TEXAS; AND
WHEREAS, SAID CITY COUNCIL DID FURTHER ORDER AND DIRECT SAID
CITY SECRETARY IN ADDITION TO SAID PUBLISHED NOTICE AS AFORESAID WHICH
WAS PROVIDED TO BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT IN ITSELF TO KEEP ON FILE A COPY
OF SAID DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS' REPORTS AND INCLUDE THEREIN THE LIST OF
NAMES OF THE APPARENT OWNERS, AND THE DESCRIPTIONS OF SAID ABUTTING PRO-
PERTY AS SET OUT IN SAID DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS' REPORTS PROVIDED HOW-
EVER, THAT THE SAID LIST OF APPARENT OWNERS AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS SO
INCLUDED IN SAID NOTICES SHALL MERELY BE CUMULATIVE OF AND IN ADDITION TO
THE REQUIREMENTS OF SAID NOTICE AS PROVIDED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
TEXAS AND THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI TEXAS AND SHALL NOT
IN ANY MANNER BE CONCLUSIVE OF THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OR OF THE CORRECT
DESCRIPTIONS OF SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY NOR LIMIT SAID NOTICE TO THE PRO-
PERTIES DESCRIBED OR TO SUCH APPARENT OWNERS NAMED THEREIN BUT SAID NOTICE
SHALL NEVERTHELESS BE DIRECTED TO THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF SAID ABUTTING
PROPERTY WHETHER NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED THEREIN OR NOTE AND TO ALL OTHERS
-3-
3
CLAIMING, OWNING, OR INTERESTED IN ANY MANNER IN ANY OF SAID ABUTTING
PROPERTY ON SAID STREET WITHIN THE LIMITS ABOVE DEFINED; AND
WHEREAS, SAID NOTICE AS ORDERED AND DIRECTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL
AND AS REQUIRED BY SAID ACTS AND CHARTER OF SAID CITY AS ABOVE IDENTIFIED,
WAS DULY GIVEN PUBLICATION OF SAME IN THE CORPUS CHRISTI TIMES, A NEWS-
PAPER PUBLISHED IN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS ON AUGUST 20, 1965,
AUGUST 27, 1965 AND AUGUST 30, 1965, SAID NOTICE BEING DIRECTED TO THE
OWNERS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE AFOREMENTIONED STREETS; AND
i WHEREAS, AFTER DUE, REGULAR AND PROPER NOTICE THEREOF, ALL AS
PROVIDED BY LAW AND THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, SAID HEAR-
ING, OF WHICH NOTICE WAS GIVEN, WAS OPENED AND HELD ON SEPTEMBER 1, 1965,
IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CITY HALL IN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID ORDINANCE AND NOTICE, AT WHICH TIME AN
OPPORTUNITY WAS GIVEN TO ALL SAID ABOVE MENTIONED PERSONS, FIRMS, CORPO-
RATIONS AND ESTATES, THEIR AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS., TO BE HEARD AND TO OFFER
EVIDENCE AS TO ALL MATTERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID ORDINANCE AND NOTICE,
AT WHICH TIME THE FOLLOWING APPEARED AND OFFERED THE FOLLOWING TESTIMONY:
-11-
s
A' ;
nutes •
Regular Council Meeting
September 1, 1965
Page 8
ORDINANCE N0. 7708
READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 21 -156 OF THE CORPUS CHRISTI C
-COD 1958, AS AMENDED, By MAKING PROVISION FOR ITEM 22 AS TO FORBID THE STO NG,
STANDI OR PARKING OF VEHICLES ON EITHER SIDE OF EVERHART ROAD BETWEEN H Y ROAD
AND SARA BOULEVARD AT ALL TIMES; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION.
w
The fo oing ordinance was read for the third time a passed finally by
the following vote: , Blackmon, Dunne, Jimenez
M iel and Sizemore, present
and voting "Aye ", and Wallace bsent.
FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE GRANT A ISE TO COASTAL STATES GAS PRODUCING
COMPANY TO LAY, CONSTRUCT, OPERATE,
r WITHIN THE SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED LO I ' REMOVE A CERTAIN PIPELINE
" STREETS, ROADS AND AVENUES, MORE Y DESCR BENEATH, ALONG AND ACROSS CERTAIN
OF LIQUID PETROLEUM PRODUCTS HEREINAFTER, FOR THE TRANSPORTATION
VIDING FOR FORFEITURE OF ' IUN FORTH CAR TERMS OF SAID FRANCHISE; PRO-
IONS; PUBLICATION; AND SETTING RTHHOTHER PROVISSIIONS PERTAI GTO THIS DFRANCHISE.
The for ing ordinance was read for the first time d passed•to its
second rea g by the following vote: Furman, Blackmon, Dunne, Jim z, McDaniel
and emore, present and voting "Aye ", 'and Wallace absent.
After a ten minute recess, during which time Mayor Furman and Commissi er
Dunne departed, Mayor Pro Tem Blackmon assumed the Chair.
Mayor Pro Tem Blackmon announced the opening of the public hearing on
assessments for improvements consisting of concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and
driveways, and a 3- course asphalt surface treatment on those portions of Comanche
Street, from Port Avenue intersection to Palm Drive intersection; Bluntzer Street,
lq; from Port Avenue intersection to Comanche Street intersection; Palm Drive, from
x _
det s Comanche Street intersection to Li an Street intersection; Beach Avenue from
e
4�.r fII. S. Highway Frontage Road to Timon Boulevard in'
tersection Pueblo Street, from
ik
Baldwin Boulevard intersection to Pine Street intersection; and Fifteenth Street,
from Morgan Avenue intersection to Craig Street intersection.
Mayor Pro Tem Blackmon asked Thomas McDowell, Assistant City Attorney,
to conduct hearing, and to explain, for the benefit of the Council members who
might not have attended previous hearings, the method of determining assess-
ments. Council must find that the market value of the property assessed is
enhanced at least the amount of the assessment. Mr. McDowell did so and
Presented copies of the Preliminary Assessment Roll to each member of the
Council.
Y
4
L�
Onutes
Regular Council Meeting •
September 1, 1965
Page 9
Mr. McDowell then called upon Jack Graham, Director of Public Works, who
described the plans and extent of the proposed improvements, stating that in general
these improvements would consist of excavation to permit the construction of concrete
curbs and gutters, reinforced concrete sidewalks and driveways, paving of streets,
adjustment of existing storm sewers where necessary and installation of additional
storm sewers where necessary for proper drainage of improved streets.
Mr. Graham advised of a proposed adjustment from the Preliminary Assess-
ment Roll, as it pertained to Item No. 3 on said Roll. Item No. 3 being a triangular
tract of land, two sides of which are involved in this improvement program. Mr.., Graham
proposed to Council as a recommended adjustment that the average depth of this lot
be determined, and using 100 Feet as a unit depth, adjust the rate for curb, gutter
and pavement downward accordingly. This rate would apply on both sides of the
triangle involved.
Harold Carr, was called and testified as to his qualifications as an
appraiser of real estate; stating that he has lived in Corpus Christi since 1930
and has been in the Real Estate business since 1944 and had worked in many phases
Of the Real Estate business and had made appraisals upon all kinds of property.
He stated he had inspected the streets that were involved in this program and had
viewed the property that abuts each of the streets involved, as listed on the
Preliminary Assessment Roll, and in his opinion each of these properties will be
enhanced in value at.least the amount of the assessment.
Commissioner McDaniel asked Mr. Carr how he determined the valuation of
the property occupied by Holy Cross Cemetery would be increased. Mr. Carr advised
that he had taken into consideration the amenity values.
Mayor Pro Tem. Blackmon advised that the total assessment roll would not
be read, but that those who had attended the hearing and wished to speak would.be
heard.
Mrs. Pickett, representing D. W. Grant, Trustee (Item No. 3 and Item
No. 6) asked that consideration be given to placing the sidewalks at the curb
instead of leaving an area between the curb and the sidewalk which would grow up
in weeds and require costly maintenance by the property owners. Mr. Graham stated
this area is used extensively by students and that perhaps the solution would be
to widen the sidewalks instead of simply moving them to the curbline.
*nutes •
Regular Council Meeting -
September 1, 1965
Page 10
Harold Alberts, advised that he was the owner of Lot 10, Block 4, Bayview
#3 (Item No. 68), and felt that the improvements would do considerable harm to his
property in that his off-street parking would be destroyed. Mayor Pro Tem Blackmon
asked that Mr. Graham make a personal in and report to the Council.
Mr. Alfred Nicholas appeared in behalf of the Catholic Diocese of Corpus
Christi regarding Holy Cross Cemetery. He questioned the ownership of the strip of
land between the fence and the street right of way. He stated that the Church did
not own the property and tendered a Disclaimer to this strip of property, and
maintained that the Church property does not abut the proposed improvements.
Mr. Nicholas advised that this section of the cemetery is fall and has been for
some time and has been condemned for burials by the Health Department because of
the burial of yellow fever victims in this section. Mr. Graham waa advised to
check into the ownership of the strip of land disclaimed by the Church.
Mrs. Mills appeared regarding Item No. 5 (Rose Hill Cemetery), and said
she would like the sidewalks to be placed next to the curb so that maintenance of
the grass strip between the sidewalk and the curbline would be eliminated.
Mayor Pro Tem Blackmon advised that an investigation of the matters
discussed would be made.
Motion by Jimenez, seconded by Sizemore and passed that the hearing be
closed, and that a report be made back to the Council by the Director of Public
Works regarding the questions discussed for study and recommendation of the Council.
Mayor Pro Tem Blackmon called for petitions or information from the
a ence on matters not scheduled on the Agenda.
W. L. Dunemore requested permission from the Couaci speak with
them briefly after a urnmant with regard to his inabi
to get employment.
Mayor Pro Tem Blackmon referr Dunmore
ommissioner Sizemore, a member
of the Human Relations Committee, w rmed Mr.
Dunmore he would remain after
adjournment to talk with
A pet on from Dr. M. Kurzner, consisting of i
gnatures, petitioning
the C•t Council not to change the present ordinance controlling co ruction of
tanks, batteries and other oilfield equipment in the Corpus Christi Bay, was
presented to the Council. (Petition #65_13),
WHEREAS, THE CITY MANAGER 14AS DIRECTED TO HAVE THE DIRECTOR OF
WORKS OF THE CITY INSPECT A PROPERTY ON WHICH A QUESTION WAS RAISED,
PUBLIC
PAVED PARKING AREA AND ASCERTAIN
WITH REGARD TO ALLOWING CREDIT FOR EXISTING
WHETHER SUCH PARKING AREA MIGHT HAVE SOME VALUE AND WHETHER AN ADJUSTMENT
SHOULD BE MADE IN THE ASSESSMENT AGAINST SUCH PROPERTY.
WHEREAS, THE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, HAVING BEEN
FILED WITH THE COUNCIL AND CONSIDERED; AND
WHEREAS, SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS HEARD EVIDENCE AS TO THE SPECIAL
BENEFITS AND ENHANCED VALUE TO ACCRUE TO SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY, AND THE
REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AS COMPARED WITH THE COAS OF MAKING
SAID IMPROVEMENTS ON SAID STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS ABOVE DEFINED, AND
TOGETHER WITH ALL
HAS HEARD ALL PARTIES APPEARING AND OFFERING TESTIMONY,
PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS RELATIVE TO SUCH MATTERS AND AS TO ANY ERRORS, IN-
VALIDITIES OR IRREGULARITIES IN ANY OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND CONTRACT FOR SAID
IMPROVEMENTS, AND HAS GIVEN A FULL AND FAIR HEARING TO ALL PARTIES MAKING
OR DESIRING TO MAKE ANY SUCH PROTEST, OBJECTION, OR OFFER TESTIMONY AND
HAS FULLY EX'AMINED" ^AND CONSIDERED ALL EVIDENCEjl MATTERS, OBJECTIONS AND PRO-
TESTS OFFERED AND BASED UPON SAID EVIDENCE, TESTIMONY AND STATEMENTS, SAID
CITY COUNCIL FINDS THAT EACH AND EVERY PARCEL OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE
AFOREMENTIONED STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS TO BE IMPROVED AS HEREIN DEFINED,
WILL BE ENHANCED IN VALUE AND SPECIALLY BENEFITTED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF
SAID IMPROVEMENTS UPON THE SAID STREETS UPON WHICH SAID PROPERTY ABUTS, IN
AN AMOUNT IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED
TO BE, AND AS HEREINBELOW ASSESSED AGAINST EACH AND EVERY SAID PARCEL OF
WNERS THEREOF, AND SAID CITY
ABUTTING PROPERTY, AND THE REAL AND TRUE O
COUNCIL DID CONSIDER AND CORRECT ALL ERRORS, INVALIDITIES OR DEFICIENCIES
CALLED TO ITS ATTENTION AND DID FIND THAT ALL PROCEEDINGS AND CONTRACTS
WERE PROPER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY AND THE LAWS
OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, UNDER WHICH THOSE PROCEEDINGS WERE BEING HAD, AND
• THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID CITY COUNCIL HERETOFORE HAD WITH REFERENCE TO SUCH
-5-
•
IMPROVEMENTS, AND IN ALL RESPECTS TO BE VALID AND REGULARS AND SAID CITY
COUNCIL DID FURTHER FIND UPON SAID EVIDENCE THAT THE ASSESSMENTS HEREIN -
BELOW MADE AND THE CHARGES HEREBY DECLARED AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY
ON SAID PORTION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS ABOVE
DEFINED AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF ARE JUST AND EQUI-
TABLE AND DID ADOPT THE RULE OF APPORTIONMENT SET FORTH BELOW AND THE
DIVISION OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN SAID ABUTTING PROPERTIES
AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF AS JUST AND EQUITABLE, AND
AS PRODUCING SUBSTANTIAL EQUALITY CONSIDERING THE BENEFITS TO BE RECEIVED
AND THE BURDENS IMPOSED THEREBY AND THAT ALL OBJECTIONS AND PROTESTS BE
OVERRULED AND DENIED:.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. THAT THERE BEING NO FURTHER PROTEST OR TESTIMONY
FOR OR AGAINST THE IMPROVEMENTS TO COMANCHE STREET FROM PORT AVENUE TO
PALM DRIVE; BLUNTZER STREET FROM PORT AVENUE TO COMANCHE STREET; PALM
DRIVE FROM COMANCHE STREET TO LIPAN STREET; BEACH AVENUE FROM U.S. HIGH-
WAY 181 TO TIMON BOULEVARD; PUEBLO STREET FROM BALDWIN BOULEVARD TO PINE
STREET; AND FIFTEENTH STREET FROM BALDWIN BOULEVARD TO CRAIG STREET, SAID
HEARING GRANTED TO THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF ABUTTING PROPERTY ON SAID
STREET; WITHIN THE LIMITS ABOVE DEFINED AND TO ALL PERSONS, FIRMS CORPO-
RATIONS AND ESTATES OWNING OR CLAIMING SAME OR ANY INTEREST THEREIN, BED
AND THE SAME IS HEREBY CLOSED AND ALL PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS WHETHER
SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED OR NOT, SHALL BED AND THE SAME ARE HEREBY OVER-
RULED AND DENIED.
SECTION 2. THAT SAID CITY COUNCIL HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES
UPON THE EVIDENCE HEARD IN REFERENCE TO EACH AND EVERY PARCEL OF PROPERTY
ABUTTING UPON SAID STREETS WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED THAT THE SPECIAL.
BENEFITS IN THE ENHANCED VALUE TO ACCRUE TO SAID PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND
TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF BY VIRTUE OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID IM-
PROVEMENTS TO SAID STREETS UPON WHICH SAID PROPERTY ABUTS, WILL BE IN
EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS AS PROPOSED TO "BED
-6-
0
AND AS HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND
TRUE OWNERS THEREOF) AND FINDS THAT THE APPORTIONMENT OF THE COST OF SAID
IMPROVEMENTS) AND THAT ALL ASSESSMENTS HEREINBELOW MADE ARE JUST AND EQUITABLE
AND PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL EQUALITY CONSIDERING THE BENEFITS RECEIVED AND THE
BURDENS IMPOSED THEREBY) AND ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE
OF TEXAS, ANDi,'THE CHARTER PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI) TEXAS)
AND THAT THE PROCEEDINGS AND CONTRACT HERETOFORE HAD WITH REFERENCE TO SAID
IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ALL RESPECTS REGULAR) PROPER AND VALID) AND THAT ALL
:PREREQUISITES TO THE FIXING OF THE ASSESSMENT LIENS AGAINST SAID ABUTTING
:PROPERTIES) AS HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED AND THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE REAL
AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF) WHETHER NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HE
OR NOT) HAVE BEEN IN ALL THINGS REGULARLY HAD AND :PERFORMED IN COMPLIANCE
WITH THE LAW) CHARTER PROVISIONS AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE SAID CITY COUNCIL.
SECTION 3. THAT IN PURSUANCE OF SAID ORDINANCE) DULY ENACTED BY
SAID CITY COUNCIL) AUTHORIZING AND ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS OF THE AFORE-
MENTIONED STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREINABOVE DEFINED) AND IN PURSUANCE
OF SAID PROCEEDINGS HERETOFORE HAD AND .ENACTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL IN
REFERENCE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND BY VIRTUE OF THE POWERS VESTED IN SAID
CITY WITH RESPECT TO SAAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
TEXAS AND THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY) WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO CHAPTER
106 OF THE ACTS OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE MOTH LEGISLATURE OF THE
STATE OF TEXAS) KNOWN AND SHOWN AS ARTICLE 1105B OF VERNON'S ANNOTATED
CIVIL STATUTES OF TEXAS) AS AMENDED) THERE SHALL BE) AND IS HEREBY. LEVIED)
ASSESSED AND TAXED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING
UPON THE AFOREMENTIONED STREETS) AND AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS
THEREOF) WHETHER SUCH REAL AND TRUE. OWNER OR OWNERS BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY
NAMED HEREIN OR .NOT) THE SEVERAL SUMS OF MONEY HEREINBELOW MENTIONED AND
ITEMIZED OPPOSITE THE DESCRIPTION OF THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF SAID PROPERTY)
THE NUMBER OF FRONT FEET OF EACH AND THE SEVERAL AMOUNTS ASSESSED AGAINST
SAME AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF) AND NAMES OF THE APPARENT
OWNERS THEREOF) ALL AS CORRECTED AND ADJUSTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL) BEING
AS FOLLOWS) TO -WIT:
x
-7 -.
CORRECTED FISIAL AS.SSMENT ROLL
Summary of Street Improvements and Assessment Rates .
S,
1. Comanche Street, from Port Avenue intersection to intersection of Palm Drive;
and will be 44' wide, face to face of curb.
2. Bluntzer Street, from Port Avenue intersection to intersection of Comanche
J Street; and will be 30' wide, face to face of curb.
3. .Palm Drive, from Comanche Street intersection to Lipan Street intersection;
and will be 44' wide, face to face of curb.
4. Beach Avenue st from U. S'. Highway Frontage Road to Timon Blvd. intersection ;'
and will be 40' wide, face to face of curb.
5. Pueblo Street, from Baldwin Blvd. intersection to Pine St. intersection; and
' will be 30' wide, face to face of curb.
6. 15th St., from Morgan Avenue, intersection to intersection of Craig St.; and
will be 30' wide, face to face of curb.
The improvement'of these streets will consist generally of excavation to a width
ri and depth to permit the construction of concrete curbs and gutters, 4' wide, 4"
thick reinforced concrete sidewalks, 6" thick reinforced concrete driveways, and a
triple- course asphalt 'surface on a compacted subgrade.and S" compacted caliche base.
The adjustment of existing storm sewers and /or the installation of additional storm
sewers and appurtenances necessary for proper drainage of improved streets.
The assessment rates for streets 44' wide, face -to face of curb, will be:t
Zoned & used "R -1" or "R -2" C. G. & Pmt. $4.62 per L.F.
Zoned or used other than "R -1" or "R -2" C. G. & Pmt. ' 6.01 per L.F.
Driveway 0.62 per S.F.
a
0.34 per S.F.
Sidewalk
The assessment rates for streets 40' wider face to face of curb, are:
Zoned and used R -1 or R -2 C. G. & Pmt. $4.62 per L.F.
Zoned or used other than R -1 or R -2 C. G. & Pmt. 5.61 per L.F.
Driveway 0.62 per S.F.
Sidewalk 0.34 per S.F.
7.
The assessment rates for streets 30' wide) face to face of curb, are:
Regardless of zoning & use C. G. & Pmt. $4.62 per L.F. ;
vY 0.62 per S.F.
Sidewalk 0.34 per S.F.
Total Contract Price $91,298.88
Property Owners'
I. Assessment 46,194.69
$
TOTAL COST TO CITY.:.'.. 5,1BF� .19
�i....
Y
Sheet No.
�-
AD Comanche Street,
From Port Avenue to Palm Drive
.34
14o.24
Zoned &Used R -1 or R-2, C.G.
& Pavement
$4.62
.62
Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $6.01
Womack & Manning Contractor
Zoned & Used
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk Per sq. ft•
$ ,62
Concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and Assessment Rate Driveway per sq. ft-
driveways, 3 course•asphalt surface
treatment.
:TEM
DESCRIPTION
TOE'
AMOUNT
NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Q,UANTiTY OF
ASSESSED t3SESSMENT RATE
AMOUN T
ASSESSED
CO CHE STREET
PORT A -NORTH SIDE
1 HAWN SASH & DOOR, HAWN TRACT,
818.13 L.F. Curb, Gutter, Pa, 6.01
62
4916.96
Zoned, and used other than R -1 0
694.58 S.F. 20'- 22' -35' Five
1007.94
R -2. •Lot G of Hewn Tract.
2964.52 S.F. Sidewalk •�
355.5
2 EULA RICHARDSON
Zoned and used other than R -1
100.0 L.F. Curb,Gutter,Pavmt. 6.62
667.50
or R -21 Rankin Tract, 100 x
108.87 S.F. 12' Driveway
S.F. Sidewalk •34
��
100 ft. out of E. 92 Acre Tract
352.0
7 ,1
D.
PALM VE
i
4
?5
D. W. GRANT
Pts. of Lots 8, 9tt 10, 11, 12,
13 and 14, Block 4, Los
Angeles Hills, Zoned and used.
other than B -1 or R -2. Assessed
84.65%-,
CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO.
,Lot 14, Block 5, Los Angeles
Hills
JAMES M. WILSON
Unplatted property out of 6
acres, Brennen Tract .
ROSE RILL CEMETERY
Used R -1 or R -2
COMANCHE
*Adjusted front footage bees
irregular, shape of I lot.
*103.12 LLF• urb,Gutter,Pavmt.
:O_ Driveway
412.48 S.F. Sidewalk
76.56 L.F. urb,Gutter, :
113.07 S.F.1 12' Driveway
258.24 s.F.1 sidewalk
324.73 L.F.1 Curb,Gutter,Pavmt,
58.92 S.F. 35' dewalk
359.6 L.F. urb,Gutter, Pavmt
467.32 S.F. 20' Driveway
1314.40 S•F. Sidewalk,
EET Asnss $13,359.82
of -
6.ol 1951.63
.62 195.31
•34 394.03 25 0.97
4.62 1661:35
.62 289.74
.34 446.90
2397.99
5.09
524.88 .
.62
-0-
.34
14o.24
5•
.6. 01
454.12
.62
70.10
.34
87.80
6.ol 1951.63
.62 195.31
•34 394.03 25 0.97
4.62 1661:35
.62 289.74
.34 446.90
2397.99
�.
Sheet No.�
Bluntzer Street - From Port Avenue to Comanche Street
Womack & Manning Contractor
Concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and
driveways, 3 course asphalt surface
treatment.
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ 4.62
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $!F.:62
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $ .34
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $ .62
ITEM
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
Other Th
RI or R2
RATE
In
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
BLUN1Fz
ER STREET
PORT AVEP
UK -& EAST SIDE
*169.29 L.F.
564.76 S.F.
421.16 S.F.
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt.
27' -35' Driveway
Sidewalk
6
D. W. GRANT
Lots 8rr 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 & 14,
Block 4, Los Angeles Hills,
Zoned and Used Other Than R -1
i,
@.38
.62
.34_
462.98
350.15
143.19
or R -2. 51.56% Assessed.
*Adjusted front footage because
of irregular shape of lot. °•
COMANCHE
STREET
BLUNT
ER STREET
PORT AVENUE
& WEST SIDE
50.0 L.F.
118.68 S.F.
152.0 S.F.
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt.
12' Drive
Sidewalk
7
MAX ORSANSKI
Lots 5 and 6, Block 5, Los
Angeles Hills, Zoned other
than R -1 or R -2.
4.62
.62
.34
231.00
73.58
51.68
356.-2E
8
CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO.
Lot 7 and 8, Block 5, Los
Angeles Hills, Zoned other than
R -1 or R -2.
50.0 L.F.
-O-
200.0 S.F.
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt,
Driveway
Sidewalk
4.69
.62
.34
231.00
-0-
68.00
299.00
9
MAX ORSHANSHI
Lots 9 and 10, Block 5, Los
Angeles Hills, Zoned other
50.0 L.F.
-0-
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt.
Driveway
4.62
.62
231.00
-0-
than R -1 or R -2
200.0 S.F.
Sidewalk
.34
68.00
299.00
10
EVA NUNCIO
Lots 11 and 12.-Block 5, Los
Angeles Hills, Zoned Other
Than R -1 or R -2.
50.0 L.F.
100.68 S.F.
160.0 S.F.
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt.
10' Driveway
Sidewalk
4.62
.62
.34
231.00
62.42
54.40
7. 2
11
'�
CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO.
Lots 13 and 14, Block 5, Los
'Angeles Hills, Zoned other tha
R -1 or R -2.
50.0 L.F.
-0-
200.0 S.F.
urb,Gutter,Pavmt.
Driveway
Sidewalk
4.62
.62
.34
231.00
-0-
68.00
299•
COMNICHE
STREET
- $2
49%i%:
`BLUNTZER STREET AcESESSMEUT
Palm Drive - °From Comanche Street to Lipan Street
Sheet
No,
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G.
& Pavement $4.62
Womack & Manning Contractor
Zoned 1: 11 Other Than R -1
or R -2 p.l.f.
$6.01
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and Assessment Rate Driveway per sq, ft.
driveways, 3 course asphalt
,
$ ,62
surface
treatment.
NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
OF
ASSESSED ASSESSMENT RATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
P DRIVE
COMANCHE TREET -EAST SIDE
12 H. RICHARDSON
A Portion of E. 92 Acres of
400.0 L.F. urb,Gutter,Pavmt. 6.01
1+30.0
240.40
Tracts "A ", "g "� "C�� and nEu
of the Rankin Tract.
S.F. 4_12' & 1 -10' Dri a .62
1368.0 S.F. Sidewalk .34
266.60
465.12
13 . & H. Properties
972.12
oned other than R -1 and R -2.
44.34 L.F. urb,Gutter,Pavmt,
6.01
-0- rivevay
266.1+8
.62
177.36 S.F. Sidewalk .34
"0-
60.30
32 .7
LI STREET
DRIVE
�6MAi mare " - _- - --
14 OLY CROSS CEMETERY
-1 or R -2 Rate Assessments L. F.
-
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt. 4,62
56'z9
*Adjusted Frost Footd$e
-0- Driveway 62
2017.36 S.F sidewalk
-0"
.:34
685.90
29 2.03
LIP STREET
Palm Drive Assessmen s
- $4,240-9
Sheet No.'�
RFA p�rcnn�7,+ - 71'Rl1M ii
.281 gn •n
nlll\ BLVD,
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ 4,62
Womack & Manning Contractor Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $ 6.01
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $ ,34
Concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and Assessment Rate�Driveway per sq. ft $ .62
driveways, 3 course asphalt surface
treatment.
CTEM .
NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY
ASSESSED
15 DAVE BERGMAN
16
17
E
U. S.' HIGH
DESCRIPTION Tpmnr,
OF AMOUNT
13SESSMMT RATE I AMOUNT ASSESSED
Lot 12, Blk. 75, Brooklyn Addn.
130.0 LF
Curb, Gutter,Pv*t;
Zoned other than R -1 or R -2
325.6 9 SF
Driveway
380.oa S
Sidewalk.
ALV,fE. RURWITL
Lot 11, Blk. 75, Brooklyn Addn
130.0 LF
Curb, Gutter,Pvmt
Zoned other than R -1 or-R -2 ,:
-0-
Driveway
(:
520.0 .SF
Sidewalk
?
SEA
AVE.
BEA
AVENUE
SEAGULL A E. - SOU SIDE
JOE GROBE
Lot 12, and a portion of alley.
way (closed) between Lots 11
146.52 IF
Curb, Gutter,Pvmt.
&
12, Blk- 68, Brooklyn Addn.
381.36 SF
426.08 SF
2 - 20' drives'..'
Sidewalk
Zoned & used other than R -1 or
R-2.
TI ON BLVD.
B
AVENUE
18' 'Shemxock Oil.& Gas
Lot 2, Blk. 74, Brooklyn Addn.
Zoned & used other than R -1 or
a:
R-2.
s
130.0 LF
325.68 SF
380.0 SF
Curb, Gutter,Pvmt.
35' Driveway
Sidewalk
6.61 7V.30
.62 201.92
•34 129.20
:6.
.34
6.61
.62
.34
6.61 I
.62
.34
1,203.29
79.3
201.9
129.2C
1,0 0.
Beach Avenue- From U. S. Highway 181 to "Dimon Blvd.
Sheet NO.�
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ 4.6P
Womack & Manning Contractor
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 1).1.f. $ 6.01
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft.
Assessment Rate
$ .34
Concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and
driveways.. 3 course,asphalt surface
Driveway
per
sq. ft
$ .62
treatment.
ITEM
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
.,DESCRIPTION
OF
TOTAL
ASSESSED
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
19
S. R. MEYERS
Lot 1, Block 74, Brooklyn Addn.
Zoned other than R -1 or R -2.
130.0 L.F.
118.68 S.F.
Curb Gutter Pavmt
x.62
799.30
472.0 S.F.
12' W. Driveway
Sidewalk
.34
73.58
160.48
20
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
Portion Lot ll, Block 6$ and
20 .0 L.F.
Gutter,Pavmt
f.61
110.20
.3
Portion of Alley in Block 68,
_p_
80.0 S.F.
Drive
Driveway
Sidewalk k
,Q-
-0-
'
Brooklyn Addn.
•34
27.20
0
BEA H AVENUE
SEA GULL
VENUE -NORTH SIDE
21
MAY BLYTHE'
Lot 2, Block 69, Brooklyn
Addn., Zoned and used other the
130.0 L.F.
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt
0.61
7t9 30
R -1 or R -2.
_0_
520.0 •S.F.
Driveway
Sidewalk
.62
.
-0-
34
176.80
22
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI '
99 .lo
Alley Way Between Lots l and'2,
Block 69, Brooklyn Addn.
20.00 L.F.
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt
6
Ile, 20
-0-
80.0 S.F.
Driveway
Sidewalk
62
-0
•34.
27.20
23
MAY BLYTHE
1 Q. F9 0 ..
A Portion of Lot 1, Block 69,
Brooklyn Addn., Zoned other
13.45 L.F.
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt
6.61
$$,45
than R -1 or R -2
-0-
53.80 S.F.
Driveway
Sidewalk
.62
-0-
34
18.29
3.
TI ON BLVD.
Beach Avendment, 3
..
x,
c
,
Pueblo Street - From Beldwin,Blvd
Sheet No.
to p'ne Street
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ 4,62
Womack &'Manning Contractor
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p,l,f. $ 4,r2
Concrete curbs, gutters,;sidewalks and
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft.
$ .34
Assessment Rate,
driveways, 3 course asphalt surface
Driveway
*30' FF
per
sq ft
$ ,62
�.
ITEM
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCOFPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
PUE
0 STREET
BALDWIN
VD. -EAST SIDE
24
ROCKET OIL COMPANY
of 7, Block 6, Austin Addn.
*85,0 L.F.
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt
4,62
392.70
ther than R -1 or R -2, 1
_0_
340.0 S.F.
4eway
Sidewalk
•62
-0_
ssessment.
•34•
115,60
25
ALIN0 MONTEMAYER
5 .30
of 6, Block 6, Austin'Addn, ;''
100yu
32.57 h.F,
urb,Gutter,Pav}gt,
4,62
150-47-1,
118.68 S.F.
]16.0
veway _ 12'
.62
73.58
•
S.F.
idewe lk
•34
39.44
26
T NATIONAL 7IFE INS. CO, .
2 3. 9
of 5, Block 6 Austin Addn.
-1, 100 ('
.45.0 L.F.
urb,Gutter,Pavmt,
4;62'
20 7.90
-0-
180.0 S.F.
Driveway,
Sidewalk
.62
.34
_
61 .20
.
27
_
CARIES CANTU
t 34, Block 7,
45.0 L.F.
urb,Gutter,Pavmt,
4.62
20 T 90
2 9.10
Austin Addn.,
-0-
ive
,62
-0-
180.0 S.F. Sidewalk
.34
61.20
28
RARITA S. CONUUR4S
2 9.10
of 33, 'Block 7, Austin Addn.."
40.0 L.F.
urb,Gutter,Pavmt.
4.62
184.80
100.68 S.F.
120.0 S.F.
veway - 10';
idewalk
,62
62.42
•34
40,80
29
OR CAVOZAS
2 .02
t 32, Block 7, Austin Addn,
40,0 L.P.
urb,Gutter,Pavmt,
4,62
184.80
118.68 S.F.
112.0 S.F.
veway - 12'
Sidewalk
.62
73.58
,34
38 08
•
*This Property Abuts on Pueblo Street •
29
for Approx, 130.Ox, Credit:Gi en for
---
Baldwin Paving 45 L.F.
Pueblb Street - From Baldwin Blvd.,to Pine Street Sheet No
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ 4,62
Zoned &Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. ;2
Womack & Manning Contractor Assessment Rate Sidewalk
per sq. ft. $..34
Concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and Assessment Date, Driveway per sq ft $ ,62
driveways, 3 course asphalt surface treatment.
ITEM , •
NO. OWNER &.PROPERTY DESCRIPTION DES
QUANTITY
ASSESSED • ASS
CASTILLO
Lot 31, Block 7, Austin Addn. '
40.0 L.F.
Curb, Gu
118.68 S.F.
Driv
312.0 S.F.
Sidewall
31 DAVID TORRES
-
Lot 30, Block % Austin Add,.'"`
40.0 L.F.
Curb,Gu
118.68 S.F.
Driv
312.0 S.F.
Sidewa
32 R. R. GONZALES
Lot 29 and Lot 28, Block 7,
80.0 L.F.
Curb,Gu
Austin Addn,
136.68 S.F.
Driveway
264.00 S.F. Sidewalk
CRIPT16N .
.�
OF A
AMOUNT
5 -l0
` 33 ALBINO SATO
Lot 27,-Block 7, Austin Addn. `` 40.0 L.F. Curb,Gutter,Pavmt. 4.62 184.80
-0- Driveway .62 -0-
160.0 S.F. Sidewalk ,34 .' 54.40
239.20
34 FRANK QUIROZ, JR.
Lot 26, Block 7,'Atistiii Addb;" 40.0 L.P. Curb,Gutter,Pavmt. 4,62 184.80
118.68 S.F. Driveway - 12' .62 73.58
112.0 S.F. Sidewalk .34 38.08
296.46
35 JOSE & FRANCISCO gWOZ
Lots 25 and 24, Block 7, 80.0 L.F. Curb,Gutter,Pavmt. 4.62 369.60 1
Austin Addn. ,.• ?37.36 S.F. Driveway, 2 -12' .62 14 .16
224.0 S.F. Sidewalk 7
•34 76,16
592.92
36, ISIDR6 GALICA
Lot 23, Block 7, Austin Addn.. " 40.0 L.F. Curb,Gutter,Pavmt, 4.62 184.80
,J( r 118.68 S.F. Driveway - 12' .62 73.58
112.0 S.F. Sidewalk ,34 38.08
Pueblo Street _ From Baldwin Blvd.
Sheet No
to Pine Etre-et
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ 4.62
Womack &Manning Contractor Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p,l,f, $t..t }a
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft,
$
Concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft
—
.
$
driveways, 3 course asphalt Surface
.62
treatment.
:TEM
,NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY OF
TOTAL
'ASSESSED ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
37
ARD G. RODRIGUEZ
of 22, Block 7, Austin Addn.
45.0 L.F. urb,Gutter,Pavmt,
4.62
20 7.90
;.
118.68 S.F. vewsy _ 12'
132.0. S.F.
.62
'
Sidewalk
•34
44
44.88
38
CISCO VELA
32 ,3
of 21, Block 7, Austin Addn.:
45.0 L.F..Curb,Gutter,Pavm,
4.62
-O- Driveway
180.0
2 07-90 7.90
-0_
S.F. Sidewalk
.34
61.20
39
TOMAS M. MALDONADO
2 9410
ot,20,,Block 7, Austin Addn,.
45,0 L.F. Curb,Gutter,Pavmt
4.62
207,90
180.0 S.F. , Sdewalk
•62 •
•34 •
-0-
61.20
40
DESTO G. HERNANDEZ
2 9.10
of 19, Block 7, Austin Addn,
45 -o L.F. Curb,Gutter,Pavmt
4,62
20
118.68 S.F. Driveway.- l.2'
132,0
,62
73.58
+
S.F. Sidewalk
,34
44.88
41
& B. TORRES
32 .3
Lot
18, Block 7, Austin Addn,
56.44 L.F. Curb,Gutter,Pavmt.
4,62
-O- Driveway
225.76
.62
260.75
_O_
Sidewalk
,34
76.76
�.
337.51
�u
PM STREET
161
Pueblo Street -Frew Baldwin Blvd. to
Sheet No..�
Pine Street
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ 4.62
Womack & Manning Contractor
Zoned &Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $sr,,;
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq, ft,
Concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and Assessment Rate
$ •34
Drivew
driveways, 3 course asphalt surface
ay Per
sq ft
$ •62
treatment.
ITEM
NO.
R
OWNER PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
TOTAL
OF
ASSESSED ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
PUE 0 STREET
BALDWIId VD.-WEST SIDE <;
42
J. A. SOLIZ
Lot'89, Block 1, Austin Addn.,
Othe r than R -1 or R -2, 100%r
*11$.0 L.P. urb,Gutt er,Pavm
381:36 S.F. Driveway-
4,62
545.16
Assessment,
2- 20';,;
312.0 S.P. Sidewalk
.62
236.44
3
.34
106.08 -�
43
.•A.^SOLIZ
7..
t ad Block 1, Austin Addn,'
Zoned other than R -1
95.04 L.F. Curb,Gutter,Pavmt
4.62
or R -2,'.
100$ Assessment,
217.68 S.F, Driveway _ 23'
288,16 S.F.
,62
i39.o8
34.96
Sidewalk
•34
97,97
44
ADALUPE 0. cANSZrro
72.01
of 2, Block 1, Austin Addn ,'
Zoned R -1 or R -2
45.0 L.f, Curb,Gutter,Pavmt,
118.68 S.F.
4.62
20 7.90
Driveway - 12'
132.0 S.F. Sidewalk
62 .
73.58
.34
44.88
45
QM.OUVMZ
326-36
t 3, Block 1, Austin Addn
Zoned R -1 or R '
40.0 L.F. Curb,Gutter,Pavmt.
4.62
184.80
-2.
118.68 S.F. Driveway 12'
.62
73.58
112.0 S.F. Sidewalk-
•34
38.08
46
ANDR0 BEHAVIDES'
29 .
t 4, Block 1, Austin Addn,,
Zoned R -1 or R -2.
40,0 L.F. Curb,Gutter,Pavmt
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt
4.62
184.80
118.68 S.F. '
- 12
'62
73.58
112.0 S.F. Sidewalk
.34
38.08
47
ORN T, DAVILA
29 ,
t 5, Block 1, Austin Addn.,
Zoned R -1 or R -2.
40.0 L.F. Curb,Gutter,Pavmt
4.62
184.80
118,68 S.F. Driveway _ j21
112.0 S.F.
.62
73,58
Sidewalk
X34
38.08
*Credit given for Baldwin Blvd
paving.
29 .
�; ..
Pueblo Street - From Baldwin
•
Sheet No.
Blvd, to Pine'
Street
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G.
& Pavement $4.62
Womack & Manning Contractor
Zoned &Used Other
Than R -1
or R -2 p,l,f.
$4.62
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft, $ ,
Concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and Assessment Rate
Driveway
driveways, 3 course asphalt surface
per
s q. , ft
$ ,62
taeatment.
TEM
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
A MOUNT
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
48 MRS. RATE M. BAILON
Lot 6, Block 1, .
Austin Addn,,,
Zoned R -1 or R -2
40.0 L.P. Curb, Gutter,Pavm.
4,62
184.80
118.68 S.F.
Driay S.F. Sidewalk _12*
112.0
62
T3-58
.34
38.08
s
49 ALEX Cox
29 .
Lot 7, Block 1, Austin Addn.;;
Zoned R -1 or R -2.
40,0 L.P. Curb G
, utter,Pavmt,
4.62
184,80
118.68 S.F. Driveway_12'
112.0 S.F. Sidewalk
,�
73.58
•34
38.08 '
50 RUDOLP$0 SALINAS
29 .
Lot 8, Block 1, Austin Addn.,
Zoned R -1 or R -2.
40.0 L.F. ,Gutter,Pavmt.
4.62
-0- Driveway
160.0 S.F. Sidewalk
•62
184.80
_0-
.34
54.4o
51 EPIFANIO M. CASIANO
239.20
Lot 9, Block 1, Austin Addn,.,
Zoned R -1 or R -2. '.
40.0 LF
L.F. urb,Gutter,Pavmt,
4,62
184.80
118.68 S.F. Driveway - 12'
112.0 S.F.
.62
73.58
Sidewalk
•34
38.08
52 UVALDO BENAVIDES
�9 .
Lot 10, 11 and 121'Block la
120,0 L.F.
v. Austin Addn,, Zoned R -1 or R -2.
2 Curb,Gutter,Pavmt,
37.36 S.F. Driveway - 12f
4.62
554.40
384.0 S.F. Sidewalk
,62
.34
147.16
130.56
S3 OyriTrcO
;. }
32.12 .
S4 amiTTF O tin �gN {iz'.
t
t
a
ry
' Pueblo Street - From Baldwin Blvd: to
Sheet No
Pine Street
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $4.62
Womack &Manning Contractor
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.1,Y, $4,62
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft,
$ ,34
Concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and -Assessment
Rate, Driveway per sq. ft
$ ,62
driveways, 3 course asphalt surface treatment.
ITEM
.
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
OF
TO
ASSESSED
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
55
LIo GARZA
of 13, Block 1, Austin Addn,, .. 40.0 L.F.
urb, Gutter, Pavmt,
4,62
184,80
Zoned R -1 or R -2 118,68 S.F.
Driveway - 12'
.62
.
73.58
112.0 S.F.
Sidewalk ,
31�
.08
F
56
oRANADO DENAVIDES .
29
ots 14 and 15, Block 1, Austin 80.0 L.F.
ddn.,'Zoned R -1 or R -2. 118.68 S.F.
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt
4,62
369.60
272.0 S.F.
Driveway _ -12',
Sidewalk
62
.34
72.48
92.48
535.
57
LEOCADIO BLNAVIDES
ots 16 and 17, Block 1; 80.0 L.F. Curb,Gutter,Pavmt
ustin Addn., Zoned R -1 or R -2 118,68L.F
4.62
369.60
272.0 S.F
Driveway - 12'
Sidewalk
62
•34
73.58
92.48
58
SEQUERO HMUMA
535.
Lot 18, Block 1, Austin Addn., 77,67 L.F
Zoned R -1 or R
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt
4.62
358.84
-2. 118.68 S.F
262.68 S.F
Driveway - 12''
.62
73.58
Sidewalk
.34
89.31..
_
521.73
Pueblo Street Assessme is - $12161,0 60
i +
PI1
E STREET
P
� 3
r
S
}
{ 15th Street From Morgan Aver
Womack & Manning Contractors
oncre a cur s, gutters, s ewa s and
driveways, 3 course asphalt surface
treatment.
y to Craig Street Sheet No
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -21 C.G.,& Pavement $4.62
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $4,62
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq, ft. $ 34
Assessment Rate Driveway per sq. ft. $ .62
NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIP'T'ION QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATF
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
15th S
T - EAST SIDE
MOR AVENUE
59
OirELL REFG. COMPANY
ots 1'} and 12, Block 3,
ew #3, Zoned and ixsed
*45,0. L.F.
Curb Gutter Pa t
�
4'62
other *•48,0 L.F. Pavement On)
han R -1 or R -2. 5y
1.93
207,90
92.64
212.0 S.F,
Driveway =, 12'
Sidewalk -
62
•34
72.03
60
UISE DaBY
72.
of 13, Block 3, Bayview #3
oned other than R- 1 or R
50.0 L.F.
4,62
231.00
-2.
.
193.56 S.F.
*190.0 S.F.
121 Drive
12' Driveway
idewalk
62
120.00
•34
64.60
*Credit given for existing
mprovement,
15•
61
GARZA
of Zoned Block 3 s Bayview
Zoned #3,
R -1 or R
50.0 L.F.
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt.
4.62
-2.
`y
193.56 S.F.
*14$,0
Driveway _ 12'
2 31.00
120.00
S.F.
Sidewalk
.3
50.32
62
GENIA VILLAREAL
01.32
of 1 Block 5' Bl3, Bayview #3,
Zoned R -1 or R -2, v
50.0 L.P.
193.56 S.F.
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt,
4,62
231,00
152.0 S.F.
DriveWa
Sidewalk - 12
.62
120.00
•34
51.68
63
G. ELIZONDO
02.
t 16, Block 3, Bayview #3 '
Zoned R -1 or R -2. 'V
50.0 L.F.
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt.
4.62
"
•
193.56 S.F.
*152.0
Driveway - 12'
.62
231.00
120.00
S.F.
Sidewalk •
.34
51.68
64
R. DENNIS EST.
.
02.
t 17, Block 3, Bayview #3,
Zoned R -1 or R -2.
50.0 L.V.
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt
4'62
,
193.56 S.F.
Drive ,
12
231.00
*184.0 Stye
Sidewalk -
•62
34.
120.00
62.56
*Credit 8
given for exsistin i rovement.,
13.5
.
r Sheet NO
15th Street from Morgan Aven-�, to•6raig Street -
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $4.62
Womack &Manning Contractor Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $4,62
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $ ,34
Concrete curbs, gutters,-sidewalks and Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $ .62
driveways, .3 course asphalt surface
treatment.
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
OF .
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
65
AULINE BERRERA
of 18, Block 3, Bsyview ,` #3,
50.0 L,F.
Curb, Gutter,Pavmt
4.62
231.00
Zoned R -1 or R -2. ��
*153.56'S.F.
10' Driveway..
62
.95,21
*.30.0
Sidewalk `
.34
10.20
336.41
66
a. C. & ELLNORA STORY
Lot 19, Block 3, Bayview #3, , -;:
50.0 L.F.
Curb,.Gutter,Pavmt
, 4.62
231.00
.Zoned R -1 or R -2. v
193.56 S.F,
Driveway - 12'
.62
120.00
* -0-
Sidewalk
,34.
-0-
351.00
67
A. D. CORGEY
Lot 20, Block 3, BayvieS #31
54.0 L.F.
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt
4.62
.249.48
Zoned R -1 or R =2. ''..
-0-
Driveway
-0-
V :
* -0-
Sidewalk
.62
34
-0_
2 9,
CRPIG
STREET
15th S
EET - WEST SIDE
MO
GAN AVENUE
68
H. ALBERTS
Lot 10, Block 4, Bayview #3, ;'
*40,0 L.F.
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt
4.62
184.80
Zoned and used other than R -1 :
-0-
Driveway
62
-0-
r R -2.
212.0 S.F.
Sidewalk
,34.
72.08
256.88
69
AMELIA MONCADA
Lot 9, Block 4, Bayview #3,
50.0 L.F.
Curb,GUtter,Pavmt'.
4.62
2 31. 00
Zoned other than,R -1 or R -2.
193.56 S.F:
Driveway - 12'
.62
120.00
152.0 S.F.
Sidewalk
,34
51.68
•
02.
70
ALFREDO MONmYA
Lot 8, Block 4, Bayview #3,
50.0 L.F.
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt
4.62
231.00
Zoned other than R -1 or R -2.
193.56 S.F.
Driveway -12'
.62
120.00
164.0 S.F.
Sidewalk
.34
55.76
-TOT-77-F-7'
*Credit given for existing
mprovement.
}
1
Sheet No.
15th STHEET FROM Morgan Avene,
TO CRAIG STREET
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G.
& Pavement $4.62
Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $4__
WOMACK & MANNING CONTRACTORS
Zoned & Used Other
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. it.
s •62
As Rate per sq• ft.
sesE ent
Concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and
_Driveway
• driveways, 3 course asphalt surface
treatment.
:TEM
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
AMOUNT
NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION.
WANTITY
ASSESSED
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
15th S
T -WEST SIDE
.
M RGAN AVENUE
71 ACOB KgUMMERT
. t 7, Block 4 Bayview #3,
5 0.0 L.F.
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt. .4.62
.62
231.00
120.00
Zoned •R -1 or R -2.
193.56 S.F.
Driveway - 12'
55.76
J
*164.0 -S.F.,
Sidewalk
•34
0 .7
72 rommy BRUNI
t 6, Block 4, Bardew #3,
5 0.0 L.F.
Curb,Gutter,Pavmt.
1 24'
4.62
231.00
112:08
Zoned R -1 or R -2.
iaoM S.F.
Driveway- 2
.62
80.92 ,
238.0• S.F.
Sidewalk
.34
73 ORN V. RODRIGUEZ
Block 4, BaYview #3,` :,
50.0 L.F. -
Curb,Gutter Pavmt.
4.62
231.00
of 5,
Zoned R -1 or R -2.
3:.. 8 S.F..
�-
Driveway - x•-'24'
.62
1b208 .
-0-
•
-
* -0-
Sidewalk
•34
3.
,74 .. J. C. CHAPA
Lots 4 and 3, Block 4, .
100.0 L.F.
'Curb,Gutter,Pavmt.
4.62
462.00
1
r' Bayview #31 Zoned R -1 or R -2.
*285.12 S.F.
2 - 12' Driveways
.62
66.9 �.
*188.0 S.F.
Sidewalk
•34
702.79
\
75 VICENTE FLORES
Lot 2, Block 4; Bayview #3,,'-
50.0 L.F.
Cur b,Gutter,Pavmt.
4.62'
231.00
120.00
Zoned R -1 or R -2
193.56 S.F.
Driveway - 12'
.62
51.68
*152.0 S.F.
Sidewalk
02.
76 RICHARD PLATZ
Lot 1, Block 4, Bgyview #3,
5 4.0 L.F.
Curb Gutter Pavmt. 4.62
'
249.48
Zoned R -1 or R -2:
-0-
216.0 S.F.
Driveway
Sidewalk
.62
.34
_0_
73.44
•t:
322.92 -
C
G STREETi
\
END
0, PROJECT
Credit given for existing improvement.
15th Street Assessments -
7013.80 '
SECTION 4. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED THAT 'IN THE EVENT THE ACTUAL
FRONTAGE OF ANY PROPERTY HEREIN ASSESSED SHALL BE FOUND UPON THE COMPLETION
OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS TO BE GREATER OR LESS THAN THE NUMBER OF FEET HEREIN -
ABOVE STATED, THE ASSESSMENTS HEREIN SET AGAINST ANY SUCH PROPERTY AND AGAINST
THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, SHALL BE, AND THE SAME ARE HEREBY
DECLARED TO BE INCREASED OR DECREASED AS THE CASE MAY BE, IN THE PROPORTION
WHICH THE SAID EXCESS OR DEFICIENCY OR FRONTAGE SHALL BEAR TO THE WHOLE
NUMBER OF FRONT FEET OF PROPERTY ACTUALLY IMPROVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
• FRONT FOOT RATE OF ASSESSMENT HEREIN ADOPTED, IT BEING THE INTENTION THAT
EACH PARCEL OF PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF ABUT-
TING ON THE PORTIONS OF THE AFOREMENTIONED STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS ABOVE
DEFINED, SHALL PAY FOR SAID IMPROVEMENTS UNDER THE "FRONT FOOT RULE OR PLAN ",
WHICH RULE OR PLAN IS HEREBY FOUND AND DETERMINED TO BE JUST AND EQUITABLE
AND TO PRODUCE A SUBSTANTIAL EQUALITY, HAVING IN VIEW THE SPECIAL BENEFITS
TO BE RECEIVED AND THE BURDENS IMPOSED THEREBY; AND IT IS FURTHER ORDAINED
THAT UPON FINAL COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS ON SAID
AFOREMENTIONED STREETS, ALL CERTIFICATES HEREINAFTER PROVIDED FOR, ISSUED
TO EVIDENCE SAID ASSESSMENTS AGAINST SAID PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON
SAID STREETS, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, SHALL BE ISSUED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH, AND SHALL EVIDENCE THE ACTUAL FRONTAGE OF SAID PROPERTY
AND THE ACTUAL COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS, THE AMOUNT NAMED IN SAID CERTIFI-
CATE IN NO CASE TO EXCEED THE AMOUNT HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST SUCH PROPERTY
UNLESS SUCH INCREASE BE CAUSED BY AN EXCESS OF FRONT FOOTAGE OVER THE AMOUNT
HEREINABOVE STATED, SUCH ACTUAL COST AND SUCH ACTUAL NUMBE,QF FRONT FEET,
IF DIFFERENT FROM THE HEREINABOVE SHOWN IN SECTION 3 HEREOF, TO BE DETER-
MINED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS UPON COMPLETION OF SAID WORT( ON SAID
• STREET, AND THE FINDINGS OF SAID DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS •SHALL BE FINAL
AND BINDING UPON ALL PARTIES CONCERNED. ,
SECTION 5. THAT THE SEVERAL SUMS MENTIONED ABOVE IN SECTION 3
HEREOF ASSESSED AGAINST SAID PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING ON THE .PORTION
OF THE AFOREMENTIONED STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, AND THE REAL AND
-8-
y
TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, WHETHER NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN OR NOT, SUBJECT
TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 4 HEREOF, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST THEREON AT THE
RATE OF FIVE PER CENT (5%) PER ANNUM WITH REASONABLE ATTORNEYS FEE AND ALL
1
COSTS-AND EXPENSES OF COLLECTION, IF INCURRED, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE
MADE A FIRST AND PRIOR LIEN UPON THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY, AGAINST
WHICH SAME ARE ASSESSED FROM AND AFTER THE DATE SAID IMPROVEMENTS WERE
ORDERED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, TO -WIT: AUGUST 18, 1965, AND A PERSONAL
LIABILITY AND CHARGE AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF,
WHETHER OR NOT SUCH OWNER OR OWNERS BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN,
AND THAT SAID LIEN SHALL BE AND CONSTITUTE THE FIRST AND PRIOR ENFORCEABLE
CLAIM AGAINST THE PROPERTY ASSESSED AND SHALL BE A FIRST AND PARAMOUNT LIEN
SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER LIENS, CLAIMS OR TITLE, EXCEPT FOR LAWFUL AD VALOREM
TAXES; AND l,T,HAT THE SAME 50 ASSESSED SHALL BE PAYABLE AS FOLLOWS, TO -WIT:
IN SIXTY (60) EQUAL MONTHLY INSTALLMENTS, THE FIRST OF WHICH WILL BE PAY-
ABLE ON OR BEFORE THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE SAID IM-
PROVEMENTS IN THE STREETS UPON WHICH THE RESPECTIVE PROPERTY ABUTS, AND
ACCEPTANCE THEREOF BY THE SAID CITY COUNCIL, THE REMAINING INSTALLMENTS
TO BE DUE AND PAYABLE, RESPECTIVELY, ONE (1) EACH MONTH., BEGINNING SIXTY
(60) DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE, DEFERRED PAYMENTS TO BEAR INTEREST
FROM SAID DATE OF ACCEPTANCE AT THE RATE OF FIVE PER CENT (5 %) PER ANNUM,
PAYABLE MONTHLY CONCURRENTLY WITH EACH OF SAID INSTALLMENTS; PAST DUE IN-
STALLMENTS OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST TO BEAR INTEREST AT THE SAME RATE
PER ANNUM UNTIL PAID; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT ANY :OWNER OF SUCH PROPERTY
SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO PAY OFF THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF SUCH ASSESSMENT, OR
ANY INSTALLMENT THEREOF, BEFORE MATURITY, BY PAYING PRINCIPAL AND ACCRUED
INTEREST TO DATE OF SAID PAYMENT; AND PROVIDED, FURTHER, THAT IF DEFAULT
SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY INSTALLMENT OF PRINCIPAL OR INTEREST
WHEN DUE, THEN THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF SAID ASSESS14ENT UPON WHICH SUCH DEFAULT
IS MADE, SHALL, AT THE OPTION OF WOMACK & MANNING, THEIR SUCCESSORS OR
ASSIGNS, BE, AND BECOME IMMEDIATELY DUE AND PAYABLE AND SHALL BE COLLECT-
IBLE TOGETHER WITH REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES AND ALL COSTS AND EXPENSES
OF COLLECTION, IF'INCURREO.
ww
SECTION 6. THAT THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, SHALL NOT
IN ANY MANNER BE LIABLE FOR THE PAYMENT OF ANY SUMS HEREBY VALIDLY ASSESSED
AGAINST ANY ABUTTING PROPERTY, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THERE-
OF, BUT WOMACK & MANNING SHALL LOOK SOLELY TO SUCH PROPERTY AND THE REAL
AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE SUMS VALIDLY
ASSESSED AGAINST SAID RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY BUT SAID CITY SHALL
BE OBLIGATED TO FURNISH WOMACK & MANNING VALID ASSESSMENTS AND ASSESSMENT
CERTIFICATES AND SHALL EXERCISE ALL OF ITS LAWFUL POWERS AND AID IN THE
ENFORCEMENT AND COLLECTION OF SAID LIENS AND ASSESSMENTS; AND IF DEFAULT f
SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY OF SAID SUMS HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST
THE SAID PARCELS OF PROPERTY, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF
COLLECTION THEREOF SHALL BE ENFORCED AT THE OPTION OF WOMACK & MANNING
THEIR SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, EITHER BY SUIT IN ANY COURT HAVING JURISDIC-
TION OR BY SALE OF THE PROPERTY ASSESSED AS NEARLY AS POSSIBLE IN THE
MANNER AS MAY BE PROVIDED BY LAW AND CHARTER IN FORCE IN SAID CITY FOR THE
SALE OF PROPERTY FOR THE COLLECTION OF AD VALOREM TAXES.
SECTION 7. THAT FOR THE PURPOSE OF EVIDENCI -NG SAID ASSESSMENTS
THE LIENS SECURING SAME AND THE SEVERAL SUMS ASSESSED AGAINST THE SAID
PARCELS OF PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF AND THE
TIME AND TERMS OF PAYMENT, AND TO AID IN THE ENFORCEMENT THEREOF ASSIGN-
ABLE CERTIFICATES SHALL BE ISSUED BY THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS TO
WOMACK & MANNING UPON THE COMPLETION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS IN SAID STREETS
AND ACCEPTANCE THEREOF BY SAID CITY COUNCILS WHICH CERTIFICATES SHALL BE
EXECUTED BY THE MAYOR IN THE NAME OF THE CITY5 ATTESTED BY THE CITY SECRE-
TARY WITH THE CORPORATE SEAL OF SAID CITY, AND WHICH CERTIFICATES SHALL DECLARE
THE AMOUNTS OF SAID ASSESSMENTS AND THE TIMES AND TERMS THEREOF THE RATE
OF INTEREST THEREON, THE DATE OF THE COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE IM-
PROVEMENTS FOR WHICH THE CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED, AND SHALL CONTAIN THE
NAMES OF THE APPARENT TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE AND
THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY ASSESSED BY LOT AND BLOCK NUMBER, OR FRONT
FOOT THEREOF, OR SUCH OTHER DESCRIPTION AS MAY OTHERWISE IDENTIFY THE
SAME AND IF THE SAID PROPERTY SHALL BE OWNED BY AN ESTATE OR FIRM, THEN
Im
TO SO STATE THE FACT SHALL BE SUFFICIENT AND NO ERROR OR MISTAKE IN
DESCRIBING SUCH PROPERTY OR IN GIVING THE NAME OF ANY OWNER OR OWNERS,
OR OTHERWISE, SHALL IN ANYWISE INVALIDATE OR IMPAIR THE ASSESSMENT LEVIED
HEREBY OR THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED IN EVIDENCE THEREOF.
THAT THE SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL FURTHER PROVIDE SUBSTANTIALLY
THAT IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY INSTALLMENT OF PRINCI-
PAL OR INTEREST WHEN DUE THEN AT THE OPTION OF WOMACK & MANNING, THEIR
SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, OR THE HOLDER THEREOF, THE WHOLE OF SAID ASSESSMENT
EVIDENCED THEREBY SHALL AT ONCE BECOME DUE AND PAYABLE, AND SHALL BE
COLLECTIBLE WITH REASONABLE ATTORNEYS FEES AND ALL EXPENSES AND COSTS OF
COLLECTION, IF INCURRED, AND SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL SET FORTH AND EVIDENCE
THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR'OWNERS OF SUCH
PROPERTY, WHETHER NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED THEREIN OR NOT, AND THE LIEN
UPON SUCH PROPERTY, AND THAT SAID LIEN IS FIRST AND PARAMOUNT THEREON,
SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER LIENS, TITLES AND CHARGES] EXCEPT FOR LAWFUL AD
VALOREM TAXES, FROM AND AFTER THE DATE SAID IMPROVEMENTS WERE ORDERED BY
SAID CITY COUNCIL, TO -WIT: AUGUST 18, 1965, AND SHALL PROVIDE IN EFFECT
THAT IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT THEREOF, THE SAME MAY BE
ENFORCED, AT THE OPTION OF WOMACK & MANNING, OR THEIR SUCCESSORS AND
ASSIGNS, BY THE SALE OF THE PROPERTY THEREIN DESCRIBED IN THE MANNER PRO-
VIDED FOR THE COLLECTION OF AD VALOREM TAXES AS ABOVE RECITED, OR BY SUIT
IN ANY COURT HAVING JURISDICTION.
THAT SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL FURTHER RECITE IN EFFECT THAT ALL
THE PROCEEDINGS WITH REFERENCE TO MAKING SAID IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN
REGULARLY HAD IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW AND CHARTER IN FORCE IN SAID CITY
AND THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY, AND THAT ALL PRE-
REQUISITES TO THE FIXING OF THE ASSESSMENT LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY THERE-
IN DESCRIBED, OR ATTEMPTED TO BE DESCRIBED, AND THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF
THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, EVIDENCED BY SUCH CERTIFICATES,
1 HAVE BEEN REGULARLY DONE AND PERFORMED, WHICH RECITALS SHALL BE EVIDENCE
OF ALL THE MATTERS AND FACTS SO RECITED AND NO FURTHER PROOF THEREOF SHALL
BE REQUIRED IN ANY COURT.
THAT SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL FURTHER PROVIDE IN EFFECT THAT THE
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI TEXAS SHALL EXERCISE ALL OF ITS LAWFUL POWERS
WHEN REQUESTED $O TO DO BY THE HOLDER OF SAID CERTIFICATES, TO AID IN THE
1 ENFORCEMENT AND COLLECTION THEREOF AND SAID CERTIFICATES MAY CONTAIN
OTHER AND FURTHER RECITALS, PERTINENT AND APPROPRIATE THERETO. IT SHALL
NOT BE NECESSARY THAT SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL BE IN THE EXACT FORM AS
ABOVE SET FORTH BUT THE SUBSTANCE AND EFFECT THEREOF SHALL SUFFICE.
SECTION 8. THAT ALL SUCH ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ARE A PERSONAL
LIABILITY AND CHARGE AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS OF THE
PROPERTY DESCRIBED OR ATTEMPTED TO BE DESCRIBED NOTWITHSTANDING SUCH
OWNER OR OWNERS MAY NOT BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED, AND ANY IRREGULARITY
IN THE NAME OF THE PROPERTY OWNER, OR THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY PROPERTY OR
THE AMOUNT OF ANY ASSESSMENTS OR IN ANY OTHER MATTER OR THING SHALL NOT
IN ANYWISE INVALIDATE OR IMPAIR ANY ASSESSMENT LEVIED HEREBY OR ANY CERTIFI-
CATE ISSUED, AND SUCH MISTAKE, OR ERRORS INVALIDITY OR IRREGULARITY WHETHER
IN SUCH ASSESSMENT OR IN THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED IN EVIDENCE THEREOF, MAY BED
BUT IS NOT REQUIRED TO BED TO BE ENFORCEABLE CORRECTED AT ANY TIME BY THE
SAID CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS. FURTHER THAT THE
OMMISSION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS IN FRONT OF ANY PART OR PARCEL OF PROPERTY
ABUTTING UPON THE AFOREMENTIONED STREETS, WHICH IS EXEMPT FROM THE LIEN OF
SAID ASSESSMENT, SHALL IN NO WISE AFFECT OR IMPAIR THE VALIDITY OF ASSESS-
MENTS AGAINST THE OTHER PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREETS AND
THAT THE TOTAL AMOUNTS ASSESSED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY
ABUTTING UPON SAID STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFINED, AND THE REAL
AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF ARE THE SAME ASS OR LESS THAN, THE ESTIMATE
OF SAID ASSESSMENT PREPARED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ''AND APPROVED
AND ADOPTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL AND ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEEDINGS
OF SAID CITY COUNCIL RELATIVE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS THEREFOR
AND WITH THE TERMS POWERS AND PROVISIONS OF SAID CHAPTER 106 OF THE ACTS
OF THE FIRST - CALLED SESSION OF THE 4TH LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS,
KNOWN AS ARTICLE 1105 -B OF VERNON'S ANNOTATED CIVIL STATUTES OF TEXAS AND
-12-
P�
THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, UNDER WHICH TERMS, POWERS
AND PROVISIONS SAID PROCEEDINGS, SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS WERE
HAD AND MADE BY SAID CITY COUNCIL. `
SECTION 9. THE FACT THAT THE STREETS HEREINABOVE MENTIONED,
AND HERETOFORE ORDERED IMPROVED AND ASSESSMENTS MADE AS HEREINABOVF PROVIDED,
ARE IN SUCH CONDITION AS TO BE DANGEROUS TO THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND PUBLIC ,.
WELFARE OF THE CITY AND ITS INHABITANTS CREATES A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND AN
IMPERATIVE PUBLIC NECESSITY REQUIRING THE SUSPENSION OF THE CHARTER RULE
THAT NO ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE OF ITS
P
INTRODUCTION AND THAT SUCH!'!ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE
i
SEVERAL MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THE MAYOR HAVING DECLARED SUCH
EMERGENCY AND NECESSITY TO EXIST, AND HAVING REQUESTED THE SUSPENSION OF
THE CHARTER RULE AND THAT THIS ORDINANCE BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE OF
ITS INTRODUCTION AND TAKE EFFECT AND BE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT FROM AND
AFTER ITS PASSAGE, IT IS ACCORDINGLY SO ORDAINED, THIS THE (/ DAY OF
SEPTEMBER, 1965.
ATTEST: /�� ('7
MAYOR
- y THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO EGAL FORM THIS THE
_DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1965:
CITY ATT NE
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
DAY OF j9�1
4
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS T# '
FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE EMERGENCY CLAUSO OF THE FORE- •
GOING ORDINANCE, A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND IMPERATIVE NECESSITY EXIST FOR
THE SUSPENSION OF THE CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT THAT NO ORDINANCE OR ,
RESOLUTION SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED, AND THAT
SUCH ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE MEETINGS OF THE CITY
COUNCIL; I, THEREFORE, HEREBY REQUEST THAT YOU SUSPEND SAID CHARTER RULE
OR REQUIREMENT AND PASS THIS ORDINANCE FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRO -
DUCED,�OR AT THE PRESENT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL. ,
• RESPECTFULLY, 4
yµ
MA YOR
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
THE CHARTER RULE WAS SUSPENDED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
DR. MCIVER FURMAN
JACK BLACKMON
PATRICK J. DUNNE
DR. P. JIMENEZ, JR.
KEN MCDANIEL
RONNIE SIZEMORE
WM. H. WALLACE
THE ABOVE ORDINANCE WAS PASSED BY THE FOLLOWIN VOTE:
DR. MCIVER FURMAN
JACK BLACKMON '
PATRICK J. DUNNE
DR. P. JIMENEZ, JR.
KEN MCDANIEL '
RONNIE SIZEMORE
WM. H. WALLACE