Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07782 ORD - 11/03/1965L t ` AN ORDINANCE' Jy CLOSING THE HEARING GIVEN TO THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE HEREINAFTER NAMED STREETS IN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, TO -WIT: s 1. GOLLIHAR ROAD, SOUTHWEST SIDE, FROM AIRLINE ROAD TO EXISTING PAVED AREA APPROXIMATELY 190 FEET EAST OF SOUTH STAPLES STREET INTERSECTION, SAVE AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION Or THE STREET WHICH ABUTS LOTS 25 AND 26, BLOCK 6; LOTS 21 AND 22, BLOCK 7; AND LOT 10, BLOCK 10, KOOLSIDE ADDITION; AND LOT 1, BLOCK 202 WINDSOR PARK NO. 4; 2. WEBER ROAD, NORTHEAST SIDE, FROM HOLLY ROAD TO MARY CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL, WHICH ABUTS THE FOLLOWING LOTS ' ONLY: LOT "C ", CARROLL WOODS #2; LOT 1, BLOCK 4; LOTS 1 AND 27, BLOCK 3; LOTS 1 AND 35, BLOCK 2; AND LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CARROLL WOODS UNIT 1; LOT 1, BLOCK 5; LOTS 1 AND 211, BLOCK 4; LOTS 1 AND 33, BLOCK 3; AND LOTS 1 AND 25, BLOCK 2, MALIBU HEIGHTS UNIT 1; 3. GREELY DRIVE, PARADE DRIVE INTERSECTION, SOUTH'SIDE; 4. HIGHLAND AVENUE, NORTH SIDE, FROM EXISTING SIDEWALK WEST OF PORT AVENUE TO OSAGE STREET, SAVE AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE STREET WHICH ABUTS LOTS 38 THROUGH 42, BLOCK 6, MONTROSE PARK; 5. ARLINGTON DRIVE, SOUTH SIDE, FROM LANIER DRIVE TO SCHOOL PROPERTY LINE, EAST OF CHURCHI'LU %DRIVE; 6. ROSEWOOD STREET, EAST SIDE, FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO BLACK STREET INTERSECTION; 7. WINNEBAGO STREET, NORTH SIDE, FROM T. C. AYERS PARK TO SAM RANKIN STREET, AND APPROXIMATELY 150 L.F. ON EAST SIDE OF SAM RANKIN, FROM WINNEBAGO STREET, NORTHWARD,,SAVE AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE STREET WHICH ABUTS LOTS 8 THROUGH 15, BLOCK "A ", DIAZ ADDITION; 8. CANTWELL DRIVE, WEST SIDE, FROM I.H. 37 TO UP RIVER ROAD i FROM CANTWELL DRIVE TO SAVAGE SCHOOL; 9. LANTANA STREET, WEST SIDE, FROM I.H. 37 TO HAMPSHIRE ROAD; AS TO THE SPECIAL BENEFITS TO ACCRUE TO SAID PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF BY VIRTUE OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALKS THEREON, AND AS TO ANY ERRORS, INVALIDITIES OR IRREGULARITIES IN ANY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OR CONTRACT THEREFOR; FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT EACH AND EVERY PARCEL OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED WILL BE SPECIALLY BENEFITTED AND ENHANCED IN VALUE tN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO BE, AND AS, ASSESSED AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT FOR THE PAYMENT OF A PORTION OF THE COST OF CONSTRUCTING SAID SIDEWALKS WITHIN THE LIMjITS DEFINED; FIXING A CHARGE AND LIEN AGAINST ALL SAID ABUTTING PROPERTIES, AND THE REAL AND TRUEIJOWNERS; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES UPON THE COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS, THE MANNER AND TIME OF PAYMENT THEREOF, AND PROVIDING FOR THE MANNER AND METHOD OF COLLECTION OF SAID ASSESSMENTS AND CERTIFICATES; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. 7782 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI FINDS: (A) THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, HAS HERETOFORE BY ORDINANCE N0. 7736, ENACTED ON THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1965, DETERMINED THE NECESSITY FOR AND ORDERED THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIDE- WALKS ON THE HEREINAFTER NAMED STREETS IN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, TO -WIT: 1. GOLLIHAR ROAD, SOUTHWEST SIDE, FROM AIRLINE ROAD TO EXISTING PAVED AREA APPROXIMATELY 190 FEET EAST OF SOUTH STAPLES STREET INTERSECTION, SAVE AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE STREET WHI.,CH ABUTS LOTS 25 AND 26, BLOCK 6; LOTS 21 AND 22, BLOCK 7; AND LOT 10, BLOCK 10, KOOLSIDE ADDITION; AND LOT 1, BLOCK 20, WINDSOR PARK NO. 4; 2. WEBER ROAD, NORTHEAST SIDE, FROM HOLLY ROAD TO MARY CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL, WHICH ABUTS THE FOLLOW- ING LOTS ONLY: LOT "C ", CARROLL WOODS #2; LOT 1, BLOCK 4; LOTS 1 AND 27, BLOCK 3; LOTS 1 AND 35, BLOCK 2; AND LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CARROLL WOODS UNIT 1; LOT 1, BLOCK 5; LOTS 1 AND 24, BLOCK 4; LOTS 1 AND 33, BLOCK 3; AND LOTS 1 AND 25, BLOCK 2, MALIBU HEIGHTS UNIT 1; 3. GREELY DRIVE, PARADE DRIVE INTERSECTION, SOUTH SIDE; 4. HIGHLAND AVENUE, NORTH SIDE, FROM EXISTING SIDEWALK WEST OF PORT AVENUE TO OSAGE STREET, SAVE AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE STREET WHICH ABUTS LOTS 38 THROUGH 112, BLOCK 6, MONTROSE PARK; 5. ARLINGTON DRIVE, SOUTH SIDE, FROM LANIER DRIVE TO SCHOOL PROPERTY LINE, EAST OF CHURCHILL DRIVE; 6. ROSEWOOD STREET, EAST SIDE, FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO BLACK STREET INTERSECTION; 7. WINNEBAGO STREET, NORTH SIDE, FROM T. C. AYERS PARK TO SAM RANKIN STREET, SAVE AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE STREET WHICH ABUTS LOTS 8 THROUGH 15, BLOCK "A ", DIAZ ADDITION; AND APPROXIMATELY 150 L. F. ON EAST SIDE OF SAM RANKIN, FROM WINNEBAGO STREET; NORTHWARD; S. CANTWELL DRIVE, WEST SIDE, FROM I.H. 37 TO UP RIVER ROAD FROM CANTWELL DRIVE TO SAVAGE SCHOOL; 9. LANTANA STREET, WEST SIDE, FROM I.H. 37 TO HAMPSHIRE ROAD; -2- C r AND IN THE MANNER AND ACCORDING TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS THEREFOR, WHICH PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE HERETOFORE BEEN APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.' (B) THAT A NOTICE DULY EXECUTED IN THE NAME OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, OF THE ENACTMENT OF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCE HAS BEEN, TO- WIT, ON THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1965, FILED WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS, THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI IS SITUATED, AND SUCH NOTICE HAS BEEN DULY RECORDED IN VOL. 972, PAGE 75, OF THE DEED OF TRUST RECORDS OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS. (C) THAT SAID CITY COUNCIL AFTER HAVING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS IN THE MANNER AS REQUIRED BY LAW AND BY THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, DID AWARD THE CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS TO STANLEY- ORION, INC. UPON ITS BEST AND LOWEST BID THEREFOR. (D) THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CAUSED THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO PREPARE AND FILE ESTIMATES OF THE COSTS OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND ESTIMATES OF THE AMOUNT PER FRONT FOOT PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE PROPERTY ABUTTING EACH OF SAID STREETS WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFINED, AND AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF. (E) THAT UPON THE FILING OF SAID ESTIMATES, THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DID BY ORDINANCE DULY ENACTED ON THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1965, PRO- VIDE FOR AND ORDER A HEARING TO BE HELD AT 3:00 O'CLOCK P. M., ON THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1965, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE CITY HALL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, AT WHICH TIME AND PLACE ALL PERSONS, FIRMS, CORPO- RATIONS AND ESTATES OWNING OR CLAIMING ANY SUCH ABUTTING PROPERTY OR ANY INTEREST THEREIN, AND THEIR AGENTS, AND ATTORNEYS, AND ALL OTHER PERSONS INTERESTED THEREIN, WERE TO APPEAR AND BE HEARD IN PERSONS OR BY COUNSEL, AND SUCH ORDINANCE DIRECTED THE CITY SECRETARY TO GIVE DUE NOTICE OF SUCH HEARING IN THE MANNER REQUIRED BY LAW. -3- (F) SAID NOTICE WAS IN ERROR IN TWO PARTICULARS, BOTH OF WHICH DO NOT AFFECT THE ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED HEREIN, AND SUCH PARTICULARS BEING CORRECTED AS FOLLOWS: IN PARAGRAPH 1, "LOT 10, BLOCK 10, KOOLSIDE ADDITION", SHOULD BE "LOT 11, BLOCK 10, KOOLSIDE"; IN PARAGRAPH 2, "WEBER ROAD, NORTHEAST SIDE", SHOULD READ "WEBER ROAD, SOUTHEAST SIDE." (G) THAT AFTER DUE PUBLICATION 'AS REQUIRED BY LAW, AND ON THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1965, AT 3:00 O'CLOCK P. M., SAID PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED AND HELD IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID ORDINANCE AND NOTICE, AT WHICH TIME AND PLACE AN OPPORTUNITY WAS GIVEN TO ALL OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED PARTIES, AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS TO BE HEARD AND TO OFFER EVIDENCE AS TO ALL MATTERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID ORDINANCE AND NOTICE, AT WHICH TIME. THE FOLLOWING APPEARED AND TESTIFIED AS FOLLOWS: 3A_ Minutes Regular Council Meeting October 27, 1965 Page 11 ti 4, Mayor Pro Tem Blackmon announced the opening of the public hearing on assessments for improvements consist'ing.of''4'. wide, 4" thick, reinforced con - 1. „ crate sidewalks along the following ,streets, adjacent and leading to various r schools within the City. Gollihar Road, southiaest side, from Airline Road to existing paved area approximately 190' east of South Staples Street intersection; Weber Road, northeast side, from Holly Road to Mary Carroll High School, Greely ft Drive - Parade Drive intersection, south side; Highland Avenud, north side, from Y existing sidewalk west of Port Avenue to Osage Street; Arlington Drive, Boutin side, from Lanier Drive to school property line, east of Churchill Vrive; Rosewood Street, east side, from Highland Avenue to Blake Street intersection, Winnebago Street, north side, from T. C. Ayers Park to Sam Rankin Street, and approximately 150 linear feet on east aide of Sam Rankin, from Winnebago Street; Cantwell Drive, west side, from I. H. 37 to Up River Road from Cantwell Drive to Savage School; r and Lantana Street, west side, from I. H. 37 to Hampshire Road. Mayor Pro Tem Blackmon stated that each member of the Council had teen ti furnished a copy of the assessment rolls pertaining to the property abutting the r sidewalk improvements (designated Sidewalk Project Unit 11), and then asked Thomas D. McDowell, Assistant City Attorney, to proceed with the hearing. Jack Graham, Director of Public Works, was called upon to explain the ' nature and character of improvements. Mr. Graham stated that the project involves nine streets, all adjacent or leading to private or public schools, and involves streets which are not curbed and guttered on a permanent basis. In all cases, consideration will be given for aide lot adjustment and credit for existing .p sidewalks or driveways which are left in place. j Harold Carr was called and testified as to his qualifications as an ap- praiser of real estate; stating that he had been in the real estate business in `Corpus Christi since 1944 and was familiar with property values in general and ' in particular in the City of Corpus Christi. He has investigated the property in question and has physically inspected each street that is listed on the assess- ment roll, a copy of which he has in his possession, and has examined and reviewed f Minutes Regular Council Meeting October 27, 1965 Page 12 = ` each assessment listed thereon. Mr. Carr stated that based on his experience as a real estate appraiser, in his opinion each of the properties listed on the assess- ' ment roll would be enhanced in value-;kit least the amount of the assessment. Mayor Pro Tem Blackmon asked'if any of the property owners involved were present and if any of them wished to be heard. Mrs. J. G. Esparza (Item No. 31) of 2914 Highland stated that she was in favor of the sidewalk being built on Highland and was not questioning the assess- , meat against her property, but that she thought the sidewalk should be on both sides of the street, since Highland is the zone line between schools and the children living on the North side of the street go to schools Located North of Highland Avenue, and children living on the South side of the street attend schools located South of Highland, and the sidewalk would only benefit those childrene living on and attending schools on the North side of the street. Mrs. Esparza stated there had been four deaths of pedestrians recently on this street. Mayor Pro Tem Blackmon advised that this was a matter of general safety and would have to be discussed at a later time, and asked Mrs. Esparza if she was questioning or protest- ing the assessment against her property. Mrs. Esparza stated that she was not, but did not think a sidewalk on one side of the street only would be an "improvement." ' Commissioner Jimenez asked why sidewalks were being built only on one side of the street. Jack Graham advised they were being built to serve school 4 children, at the City's own initiative, rather than by petition of the residents in the area, and the City had determined that these streets are most in need of sidewalks to serve school children. Graham stated that the Highland Street area is being actively considered for sidewalks on both sides of the street, because of a petition from the people in this area, and that these petitions are considered in the order in which they are received and as funds are available. Commisaioner Dunne asked if "need" was not considered and Graham stated that it was, and advised that the present sidewalks were being constructed in such a manner that they could be left in place when the street is paved on a permanent basis. Albert H. Ahrens (Item No. 85) stated that he was protesting the sidewalk which was being placed on the Cantwell Lane side of his property and was not THERE BEING NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT WHO DESIRED TO BE HEARD, THE MAYOR ANNOUNCED THAT THE HEARING WAS CLOSED AND DIRECTED THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE INCORPORATING THE FINDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL WHEN MADE. (H) THAT AT SAID HEARING NO PROTESTS, OBJECTIONS OR TESTIMONY WERE OFFERED AS TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS, THE CONTRACTS OR ASSESSMENTS THEREFOR, OR AS TO ANY OF THE PROCEEDINGS IN REFERENCE THERETO EXCEPT AS HEREINABOVE SET OUT; THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HAS HEARD ALL PARTIES WHO APPEARED AND DESIRED TO BE HEARD AS TO THE SPECIAL BENEFITS IN ENHANCED VALUE TO ACCRUE TO SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF AS COMPARED TO THE PORTION OF THE COSTS OF CONSTRUCTING SAID IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY, AND HAS HEARD ALL PARTIES APPEARING AND OFFERING TESTIMONY, TOGETHER WITH ALL OBJECTIONS AND PROTESTS RELATIVE TO SUCH MATTERS AND RELATIVE TO ANY ERRORS, INVALIDITIES OR IRREGULARITIES IN ANY OF THE PRO- CEEDINGS FOR SAID IMPROVEMENTS, AND HAS GIVEN A FULL AND FAIR HEARING TO ALL PARTIES MAKING OR DESIRING TO MAKE ANY SUCH PROTEST OR OBJECTION OR TO OFFER TESTIMONY, AND HAS FULLY EXAMINED AND CONSIDERED ALL OF SAID EVIDENCE, MATTERS, TESTIMONY AND OBJECTIONS OFFERED. (I) THAT BASED ON THE EVIDENCE, MATTERS, TESTIMONY AND OBJECTIONS CONSIDERED AT SUCH HEARING THE SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPERTIES, AND EACH AND EVERY PARCEL OF SUCH PROPERTY ABUTTING UPONSAID SIDEWALK, WILL BE ENHANCED IN VALUE AND SPECIALLY BENEFITTED IN AN AMOUNT IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT OF THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO BE, AND AS HEREINAFTER, ASSESSED AGAINST EACH OF SAID PARCELS OF PROPERTY, ABUTTING UPON SAID ALLEY, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF. (J) THAT SAID CITY COUNCIL IS OF THE OPINION, AND FINDS THAT THE FRONT FOOT PLAN OR RULE, IF UNIFORMLY APPLIED, WOULD NOT RESULT IN INJUSTICES AND INEQUITIES BETWEEN THE DIFFERENT PARCELS OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE SAME UNIT, TO WHICH SAID PLAN OR RULE IS HEREBY APPLIED; AND THE CITY COUNCIL HAS DETERMINED TO APPORTION AND ASSESS THE COST ACCORDING TO SUCH FRONT FOOT PLAN WHICH IT DEEMS AND FINDS TO BE JUST AND EQUITABLE, HAVING IN VIEW THE SPECIAL BENEFITS TO THE VALUE OF THE ABUTTING PROPERTIES. 1 0 0 (K) THAT SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS ADOPTED THE RULE OF APPORTION- MENT AND DIVISION OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN SAID ABUTTING PROPERTIES AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF HEREIN SET FORTH AND HAS FOUND THE SAME TO BE JUST AND EQUITABLE AND TO PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL EQUALITY CONSIDERING THE BENEFITS TO BE RECEIVED AND THE BURDENS IMPOSED THEREBY; AND SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS FURTHER FOUND UPON THE EVIDENCE CONSIDERED THAT THE ASSESSMENTS HEREINAFTER MADE AND THE CHARGES HEREBY DECLARED AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTIES AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF ARE JUST AM EQUITABLE AND THAT ALL OBJECTIONS AND PROTESTS SHOULD BE OVERRULED AND DENIED. SECTION 2. THERE BEING NO FURTHER PROTESTS OR TESTIMONY FOR OR AGAINST OR IN REFERENCE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS, BENEFITS OR PROCEEDINGS SAID HEARING GRANTED TO THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF PROPERTIES ABUTTING UPON SAID STREETS OR UNITS; WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFINED AND ALL PERSONS FIRMS CORPORATIONS AND ESTATES, OWNING OR CLAIMING SAME OR ANY INTEREST THEREIN, SHALL BED AND THE SAME IS HEREBY CLOSED, AND ALL PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS WHETHER SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED OR NOT; SHALL BE AND THE SAME ARE HEREBY OVERRULED AND DENIED. SECTION 3. THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES UPON THE EVIDENCE HEARD IN REFERENCE TO EACH AND EVERY PARCEL OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE SAID STREETS AND UNITS HEREIN SET OUT THAT THE ENHANCEMENT IN VALUE TO ACCRUE TO SAID PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF BY VIRTUE OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID SIDEWALKS WILL BE IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT OF THE COSTS OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO BE, AND AS HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST SAN D ABUTTING PROPERTIES AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF; AND FINDS THAT THE APPORTIONMENT OF THE COSTS OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND THE ASSESSMENTS HEREIN - BELOW MADE ARE JUST AND EQUITABLE AND PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL EQUALITY, CONSIDER- ING THE BENEFITS RECEIVED AND THE BURDENS IMPOSED THEREBY, AND ARE IN ACCORD- ANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS AID THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY; AND -5- c o FURTHER FINDS THAT ALL PROCEEDINGS AND CONTRACTS HERETOFORE HAD WITH REFERENCE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ALL RESPECTS REGULAR, PROPER AND VALID, AND THAT ALL PREREQUISITES TO THE FIXING OF THE ASSESSMENT LIENS AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTIES AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED, AND THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, WHETHER NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN OR NOT, HAVE BEEN IN ALL THINGS REGULARLY HAD AND PERFORMED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW AND THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID CITY COUNCIL. SECTION 4. IN PURSUANCE OF SAID ORDINANCE DULY ENACTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING AND ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID SIDEWALKS AS HEREIN- BELOW SET OUTS WHICH ORDINANCE WAS PASSED, AS AFORESAID ON THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1965, AND IN PURSUANCE OF SAID PROCEEDINGS HERETOFORE HAD AND ENACTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND BY VIRTUE OF THE POWERS VESTED IN SAID CITY WITH RESPECT TO SAID SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS WITH PA'R'TICULAR REFERENCE TO CHAPTER l06, ACTS OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE 40TH LEGISLATURE, KNOWN AS ARTICLE 11058, VERNON'S TEXAS CIVIL STATUTES, AS AMENDED AND ARTICLE IX, SECTION 6 OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THERE SHALL BE, AND IS HEREBY LEVIED, ASSESSED AND TAXED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY HEREIN- AFTER DESCRIBED AND ABUTTING UPON THE SAID STREETS AND UNITS HEREINAFTER SET OUT AND WITHIN THE LIMITS BELOW DEFINED AND AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF SUCH PROPERTY WHETHER SUCH REAL AND TRUE OWNERS BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED, OR SAID PROPERTIES BE CORRECTLY DESCRIBED HEREIN OR NOT, THE SEVERAL SUMS OF MONEY HEREINAFTER MENTIONED AND ITEMIZED OPPOSITE THE DESCRIPTION OF THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF SAID PROPERTY, THE NUMBER OF FRONT FEET OF EACH AND THE SEVERAL AMOUNTS ASSESSED AGAINST SAME AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND THE NAMES OF THE APPARENT OWNERS THEREOF, ALL AS CORRECTED AND ADJUSTED BY SAID CITY COUNCILS BEING AS FOLLOWS TO -WIT: i9 -6- Sheet No(-)—,— Sidewalk Improvements Unit II Stanley -Orion Inc. 4' Wide, 4" Thick Reinforced Concrete Sidewalk. Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.1.f. $ Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per lin.ft. $ 1.46 Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft, $ :Tp-M DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY . OF AMOUNT ASSESSED ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSED GOLEUTAR ROAD-SOU7.MASU SIDE GE SUBD. BEGINNING AT E P L OF G,`EEN AQRES VILL (78,83) 1 JOHN H. SEIBERT Lot 11, Block 10, Green Acres 107.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk $1.46. $107,79 ' $107.79 Village, 69% Assessed. DSor{ PaQk r040fleH SAIEM DRIVE ..,.� `'ia. (73.83) Lot 11, Llock.9, Green Acres 107.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 107.79 107.79 Village, 69% Assessed. 3 STANLEY ST"'VE KONARIK (73.83) Lot 1, Block 1, Green Acres 107.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 107.79 107.79• Village, 69% Assessed. ZAFSKY DRIVE 4 a BALD S. PLOUGHER (73.83) Lot 1, Block 4, Green Acres 107.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 107.79 107.79 t Village, 69% Assessed. 5 WILLIAM B. KYSER (78.11) - Lot 11, Block 3, Park Plaza 107.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 114.05 114.05.. Addn. 1, 73% Assessed. B HAW DRIVE 6 TERF=NCE T. O'BRIE\N (79.18) Lot 14, Block 4, Park Plaza 1, 107.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 115.60 115.60 74% Assessed. 7 ERNEST G. MAYES (79.18) Lot 13, Block 4, Park Plaza 1, 107.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 115.60 115.60 74% Assessed. 8 ALMA D. L.4WLEY (79.18) Lot 13, Block 7, Park Plaza 1, 107.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 115.60 115.60 74% Assessed. Sidewalk Improvements Unit II Stanley -Orion Inc. 4' Wide, 4" Thick Reinforced Concrete Sidewalk. Sheet'No. Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C,G, & Pavement $ Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $ Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per lin.ft. $ 1.46 Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $ TEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION - QUANTITY OF AMOUNT ASSESSED ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSED 9 GEORGE RAM (79.18) Lot 14, Block 7, Park Plaza 2, 107,0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk $1.46 $115.6o. $115.60 74% Assessed. MUJ WBROOK DRIVE ' SCHOOL PROPERTY OMITTED OWN C NTRACTOR ;10 MARTIN B. PIGOTT JR. Ot C2 Out of Lot 18, F.B.E.F. 83.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 121.18 121.18 & G. Tract, 100% Assessed. 11 H. W. REAGAN " Lot B2 Out of Lot 18, F.B.E.F. 83.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk •1.46 121.18 121.18 & G. Tract, 100%r Assessed. :12 D. A. EAGAN ' Lot A2 Out of Lot 18, F.B.E.F. 112.35 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 7.64.03 1 64.03 j & G. Tract. (Private Alley Included) 100% Assessed. END F GOLLIHAR ROAD :• s WEBER ROAD SOUTHEASTERN SIDE •' • - BEGINNING AT HOLLY ROAD INTERSE TION ;13 TRANSPORT CO. OF TEAS Lot C, Carroll Woods Unit #2, 90.21 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 131.71 131.71 100% Assessed. W4,5ToN Gopepa MON GO DRIVE . 14 (90.08) Lot 1, Block 4, Carroll Wood's, 111.24 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 131.52: '131.52 80.98% Assessed. TRI OLI DRIVE 15 EDWARD J. FISHER (89.26)' Lot 27, Block 3, Carroll Woods, 110.81 L.P 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 130.32 130.32`: Assessed. ` � • jam, Sheet No, Sidewalk Improvements Unit II Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ - Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $ Stanley -Orion Inc. Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per lin.ft. $ 1.46 4' Wide, 4" Thick Reinforced Concrete Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $ Sidewalk. i ITEM DESCRIPTION - TOTAL NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY OF AMOUNT ASSESSED ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSED 16 F. C. CARPEN'T'ER (84.78) Lot 1, Block 3, Carroll Woods, 111.24 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk $1.46 $123.78 $123:78 76.21% Assessed. \ ` CAPRI DRIVE 17 . CHARLES B. FALL JR. (83.97) Lot 35, Block 2, Carroll Woods, 110.81 L.P. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1:46 122.60 122.60' 75.78%- 18 WILLIE KRAMER (89.23) Lot 1, Block 2, Carroll Woods, 111.24 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 130.28, 130.28 ' 80.21% Assessed. KINSTON DRIVE 19 . A. T. WOLFE (108.94) Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll Woods, 136.55 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 •159.05 159.05 79.78% Assessed. ` END OF WEBER ROAD 20 CITY PARK } - Abutting Nature Park - Greely' 130.0 L.F. 41•Wide Sidewalk 1.46 189.80 189.80 Drive, 100% Assessed. , HIGH AVENUE NORTH SIDE - BEGINNING AT PORT AVENUE w . 21 Edmundo R. Barrera Lot 37, Block 6, Montrose Park 50.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 73.00 73.00 100% Assessed. 22 RAMON GONZALES Lot 36, Block 6, Montrose Park, 50.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 73.00 73.00 100%i Assessed.' - 23 RAY HARGETT Lot 35, Block 6, Montrose Park, 50:0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 73.00 73.00 100% Assessed. `ry - . Sheet No, ._ Sidewalk Improvements Unit II Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ • Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $ Stanley -Orion Inc. Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per lin.ft. $ 1.46 4' Wide, 4" Thick Reinforced Concrete Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $ Sidewalk. STEM N0. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY ASSESSED DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT 'TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED ' 24 J. E. FDMU:MRA Lot 34, Block 6, Montrose Park, 50.0 L.F.• 4' Wide Sidewalk $1.46 $73.00 $ 73,'00 1006 Assessed. 25 EVELIN OLIPHANT ' Lot 33, Block 6, Montrose Park, 50.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 73.00 73•� 100%i Assessed. . -26 '' CANDELARIO LOPEZ Lot 32, Block 6, Montrose Park, 50.0 L.F.. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 73.00 73.00 100% Assessed. ;27 ERNESTO BRIONES Lot 31, Block 6, Montrose Park, 50.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 73.00 73.00 100%i Assessed. ' 28 C. L. VAN CUBA Lot 30, Black 6, Montrose Park, 50.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 ' -73.00 73.00 ' 100% Assessed. 29 DOMINGO VALDEZ d Lot 29, Block 6, Montrose Park, 50.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 73.00_ 73.00' 100% Assessed. 30 JESUS CORTEZ ' Lot 28, Block 6, Montrose Park, 50.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 73.00 73.00- 100% Assessed. 31 JOHN ESPARZA Lot 27, Block 6, Montrose Park, 50.0 L.F. 4' Wide-Sidewalk 1.46 73.00 73.00 100% Assessed. ., 32 ALFONSO B.'GOMEZ Lot 26, Block 6, Montrose Park, 50.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 73.00 73.00 100% Assessed.. 33 GENE CRANE Lots 25 -A, 24 -A, 23 -A, 22 -A,. .284,13 L.F. .4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 414.83' '414;83 and 21 -A, Block 6, Montrose Par 100%i Assessed on 2201, 67.5+ ' Assessed on Lot 21 -A. Sidewalk Improvements Unit II Stanley -Orion Inc. 4' Wide, 4" Thick Reinforced Concrete Sidewalk. Sheet No, Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C,G, & Pavement $ Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $ Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per lin.ft. $ 1.46 Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $ Assessment Rate, Thickened Sidewalk'per• ITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY OF AMOUNT ASSESSED ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSED - DUNCAN STREET M1 34 RAUL E. SOLIS (64.00) Lot 1, Block 1, Kosar Addn.,-" 111.30 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk $1.46 $ 93.44' $ 93.44 57.50% Assessed. ; 35 FEL•IPE SALOMON (86.90) Lot 9, Block 1, Kosar Addn., 110.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 126.87 126.87 ' •79%3Assessed. DOLOBES STREET " 36 JESUS GAITAN (71.49) Lom 1, Block 9, Kosar Addn., 114.39 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 104.38 104.38 62.50% Assessed. 37 PEDRO CHAVARRIA (92.89) Lot 17, Block 9, Kosar Addn., 118,33 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 135.62 135.62 78.50% Assessed. FRAN SCA STREET S 38• CORPUS CHRISTI IND. SCHOOL DIST ELLA BARNES JR. HIGH SCHOOL ' 60.0 L.F., 100% Assessed. 60.0 L.F. 4'-Wide Sidewalk 1.46 87.60 87.60 , 39 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI 408.28 -4" 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 596.09 MEADOW PARK CENTER 76' -6" Thickened Sidewalk 2.39 181.64 100%i Assessed., 777:73 SAGE STREET END HIM AND AVENUE `: r Sidewalk Improvements Unit II Stanley -Orion Inc. 4' Wide, 4" Thick Reinforced Concrete Sidewalk. Sheet' No, Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C,G, & Pavement $ Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $ Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per lin.ft. $ 1,46 . Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $ TEM NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY ASSESSED DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED ARLINOPON DRIVE SOUTH SIDE BEGINNING AT LANIK DRIVE '40 CONRADO H. MARTINEZ ; Lot 1, Block 4, Broadmoor Park 90.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk $1.46 $131.40 $131.40 3, 100% Assessed. 41 J. W. HARTSELL Lot 2, Block 4, Broadmoor Park 57.5 L.F.• 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46. 83.95 83.95 ' { 31 i00% Assessed. 42 FRANCIS S. MARTIN Lot 3, Block 4, Broadmoor Park 57.5 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 83.95 83.95 3, 106% Assessed. - `,43 RAY SMITH Lot 4, Block 4, Broadmoor Park 57.5 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 83.95 83.95 3, 100% Assessed. 44 A. J. HARRIS Lot 5, Block 4, Broadmoor Park 57.5 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46'' 83.95,: 83.95 'LL 31 106% Assessed. ' 5� ROBERT FERGUSON f - - Lot 6, Block 4, Broadmoor Park 57.5 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 83.95 83.95 3, 100`, Assessed. 46 GEORGE K. HALBATH Lot 7, Block 4, Broadmoor Park 57.5 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 83.95 83.95 3, 100% Assessed. 47 ABEL, P. SILVA Lot 8, Block 4, Broadmoor Park 57.5 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 83.95 83.95 % 100%i Assessed. 48 RICHARD S. TOKATCH , Lot 9, Block 4, Broadmoor Park 57.5 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1:46 83:95 83.95 3, 100% Assessed. 49 JESUS R. AVALOS Lot 10, Block 4, Broadmoor Park 57.5 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk •1:46 83795 83.95 3, 100% Assessed. Sheet No. _ Sidewalk Improvements Unit II Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.P. $ Stanley -Orion Inc. Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per 1in.ft. $ 1.46 4' Wide, 4" Thick Reinforced Concrete Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $ Sidewalk. ITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY OF AMOUNT ASSESSED ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSED 50 C. E. GUERNSEY Lot 11, Block 4, Broadmoor Park .57.5 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk $1.46 $83.95 $ 83.95 3, 100% Assessed. •51= W. D- CALLOWAY - Lot 12, Block 4, Broadmoor Park 75.0 L.F.. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 109.50 109.50 3, 100% Assessed.' CHUB HILL DRIVE `52 K. B. GAINES Lot 29, Block 1, Broadmoor Park 124.38 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 129.59 129.59 3, 71.36% Assessed. CATHOLIV SCHOOL PROPERTY END A.ILINGTON DRIVE WINNEBAGO STREET ORTH SIDE GINNING AT WEST P T. C. 4YERS PARK 9 �53Y CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI T. C. AYERS PARK 589.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 859.94 859.94 100% Assessment 54 A. M. GONZALES (45.0) Lot 7, Block "A ", Diaz Addn -, 50.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 65.70 65-70 , 90% Assessed. 55 CHLOE TILLEY (45.0) Lot 6, Block "A ", Diaz Addn., 50.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 65.70 _.65.70 ' 90% Assessed. 56 ELLA DANIELS (45.o) Lot 5, Block "A ", Diaz Addn., 50.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 65.70 65.70 90% Assessed. Is 4 Sidewalk Improvements Unit II Stanley -Orion Inc. 4' Wide, 4" Thick Reinforced Concrete Sidewalk. Sheet No, _ Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $ Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per lin.ft, $ 1.46 Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $ •TEM DESCRIPTION _ TOTAL NO.' OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY OF AMOUNT ASSESSED ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSED ' 57 EDNA LEE (45.0) ` Lot-4. Block "A ", Diaz Addn., 50.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk $1.46 $65.70 $ 65.70 ' 90% Assessed. - 58 GILBERT CANTU ., (45.0) Lot 3, Block "A ", Diaz Addn.,- 50.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 65.70, 65.70 . ' 90% Assessed. 59 FLORENTINO SRELDON (45.0) Lot 2, Block "A ", Diaz Addn..' 50.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 65,70 65.70 90% Assessed. " END BAGO PROJECT " SAM I 0KIN STREET WEST SIDE BE INNING AT WnMBA STREET 60 NUECES TRANSPORTATION CO. Lots 12, 11, 10 & Part 9, 155.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 226.30 ' 226.30 ' Block 56, Bluff Addn.; 104 ' .. y Assessed. F END SAM 'STREET PROJEC ROSDIOOD STREET EAST SIDE MIGIMTING AT BIGHIAND AVE. 33 TERSECTION 61 WALLACE -E. STEWART Lot 1, Block 1, J. B. Wood Addn., 95.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 138.70 13$,70 = ' 100% Assessed. 62 GUMERSINDO ARRIAGA e Lot 2, Block 1, J. B. Wood Addn., 50.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 73.06 ' 73.00 100%i Assessed.,' r Sheet No. �- Sidewalk TmprnvPmanta T1ni+ II Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $. Stanley -Orion Inc., Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per lin.ft. $ 1.46 4' Wide, 4" Thick Reinforced Concrete Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $ Sidewalk. ITEM NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY ASSESSED DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT ASSES= 63 RAFAELA A. MAZIAS Lot 3, Block 1, J.B. Wood Addn. 50.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk $1.46 $ 73.00 $ 73.'00 ; 100% Assessed. 64 JOSE DE Los sours (73-15) - W. 1/2 Lots 4 & 5, and Part 114.59 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 lo6.80' . 106.80 of 6pp Block 1, J. B. Wood'Addn. 63.84% Assessed. MOR MN STREET 65 ANTONIO GoDoy (60.00) " - W. 1/2 Lots 8, 9 & Part of 105.41 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 87.60 87.60 Lot 7, Block 1, J. B. Wood ' Addn., 56.92% Assessed. 66 GEORGE C. HAMILTON Lot 10, Block 1, J. B. Wood '. 50.0 L.F. 4''Wide Sidewalk 1.46 ' -73.00 73.00 ' ' Addn., 100% Assessed. 67 A. F. CHAPA ` Lot 11, Block 1, J. B. Wood 50.0 L.F. -4' Wide Sidewalk •1.46 73.00 73.E Addn., 100% Assessed. 68 RAY W. COLLINS Lot 12, Block 1, J. B. WOOD 50.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 73.00 73,00 Addn., 100% Assessed. { 69 JOE D.' BROWNING Lots 13 and 14, Block 1, J. B. 100.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 146.00 ". 146.Oo ' Wood Addn., 100% Assessed. 70 MAMIE LAMBERT Lot 15, Part 16 and 17, Block- 85.58 L.F. 41 - Wide Sidewalk' 1.46 124.95 124.95 1, J. B. Wood AMD., 100% Assessed. , • _ .i� . ' .. e_`` 114 Y )r 'y r f - Sidewalk Improvements Unit II Stanley -Orion Inc. 4' Wide, 4" Thick Reinforced Concrete Sidewalk. Sheet No. Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ Zoned -& Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $ Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per lin.ft. $1.46 Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $ EEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL 70. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY OF AMOUNT ASSESSED ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSED w BU2 STREET f N.W. Side Blake Street at Aztec Street and North S de Aztec Street at Blake Str et Intersection 80 MRS. OPHILIA R. WILBURN Lot 16, Block 2, J. B. Wood 153.41 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk $1,46 $ 223,98 $223.98 Addn., 100% Assessed. ca END ROSEW D STREET PROJECT ANTWELL LANE WEST SIDE - HEGI NG AT I H. 37 81 JERRY S. GIRARD Lot 6, Navigation Heights, 100.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 146.00 146.00 100% Assessed. 82 JAMES TRACY DULANEY Lot 7, Navigation Heights, 100.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 146.00 146.00 100% Assessed. 83 A. E. HINMAN Lot 8, Navigation Heights, 100.40 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1,46 146.58 146.58 100% Assessed. 84 THE FALLS CO., INC. Lot 9, Navigation Heights, 103.47 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 151.07 151.07 100% Assessed. 85 A. H.,AHRENS Lot 10, Navigation Heights, 300.0 L.F. 4' Wide Sidewalk 1.46 438.00 438.00 100% Assessed. r UP i IVER ROAD *` END CAN L DRIVE PROJECT i SECTION 5. THE ASSESSMENTS LEVIED IN SECTION 4 ABOVE ARE FOR A PORTION OF THE COSTS OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS IN THE STREETS AND UNITS THEREIN SET OUTj AND THE ASSESSMENTS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS IN SAID UNITS ARE IN NO- WISE RELATED TOE OR CONNECTED WITH, THE IMPROVEMENTS OR ASSESSMENTS IN ANY OTHER OF THE STREETS OR UNITS DESCRIBED IN SAID ORDINANCE OR EACH OTHER; AND IN LEVYING SAID ASSESSMENTS THE AMOUNT SO ASSESSED FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS IN SAID UNITS HAVE BEEN IN NOWISE AFFECTED BY ANY FACT OR THING IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH THE IMPROVEMENTS OR THE ASSESSMENTS THEREFOR IN ANY OTHER OF SAID UNITS. THE OMISSION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS IN ANY OF SAID STREETS OR UNITS AS A WHOLE SHALL IN NOWISE AFFECT NOR IMPAIR THE VALIDITY OF THE ASSESSMENTS IN ANY OTHER OF SAID UNITS AND THE OMISSION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS IN ANY PAR- TICULAR STREET OR UNIT IN FRONT OF ANY PARCEL OF PROPERTY EXEMPT FROM THE LIEN OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS OR AGAINST WHICH A VALID PROPERTY ASSESSMENT CANNOT BE LEVIED SHALL IN NOWISE AFFECT NOR IMPAIR THE VALIDITY OF THE ASSESSMENTS AGAINST THE OTHER PROPERTIES IN SUCH UNIT. ' SECTION 6. THE SEVERAL SUMS MENTIONED ABOVE IN SECTION 4 HEREOF ASSESSED AGAINST SAID PARCELS OF ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OR OWNER THEREOF, WHETHER SAID OWNERS BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED, OR SAID PROPERTIES BE CORRECTLY DESCRIBED HEREIN OR NOTE TOGETHER WITH INTEREST THEREON AT THE RATE OF FIVE PERCENT (5n) PER ANNUM AND WITH REASONABLE ATTOR- N EYES FEES AND ALL COSTS AND EXPENSE OF COLLECTION, IF INCURRED, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE AND MADE A FIRST AND PRIOR LIEN UPON THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY AGAINST WHICH SAME ARE ASSESSED FROM AND AFTER THE DATE SAID'- IIKPROVE- MENTS WERE ORDERED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, AND A PERSONAL LIABILITY AND CHARGE AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER-OR OWNERS THEREOF WHETHER OR NOT SUCH OWNER OR OWNERS BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN, PARAMOUNT AND SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER LIENS CLAIMS OR TITLES EXCEPT FOR LAWFUL AD VALOREM TAXES; AND THAT THE SUMS SO ASSESSED SHALL BE PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI] OR ITS f ASSIGNS, IN MONTHLY INSTALLMENTS OF NOT EXCEEDING TWENTY-FOUR (24) IN NUMBER, A ` SAID PAYMENTS TO BE MADE AT THE CITY HALL IN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, • NUECES COUNTY TEXAS, THE FA RST OF WHICH SHALL BE PAYABLE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE COMPLETION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND THEIR ACCEPT- ANCE BY THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, AND ONE INSTALLMENT SHALL BE PAYABLE EACH -7- MONTH THEREAFTER UNTIL SAID ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN PAID IN FULLS INCLUDING INTEREST THEREON AT THE RATE OF FIVE PERCENT (5) PER ANNUM FROM AND AFTER THE DATE OF SAID COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE, PAST DUE PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST TO BEAR INTEREST AT THE SAME RATE PER ANNUM UNTIL PAID SO THAT UPON THE COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE BY SAID CITY COUNCIL OF THE IMPROVEMENTS IN ANY UNIT OR PORTION OF STREET ABOVE DEFINED, THE ASSESSMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SUCH COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED UNIT SHALL BE AND BECOME DUE AND PAYABLE IN INSTALLMENTS AS PROVIDED. PROVIDED, HOWEVER THE OWNER OR OWNERS OF ANY SUCH PROPERTY SHALL HAVE THE PRIVILEGE OF PAYING ALL OR ANY OF SAID INSTALLMENT TOGETHER WITH INTEREST ACCRUED THEREON DOWN TO THE DATE OF PAY- MENT; AND PROVIDED FURTHER THAT THE OWNER OR OWNERS OF ANY SUCH PROPERTY MAY PAY THE TOTAL OF SUCH ASSESSMENT WITHOUT INTEREST WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER THE COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS. IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY INSTALLMENT OF PRINCIPAL OR INTEREST, PROMPTLY WHEN DUE, THEN, AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, OR ITS ASSIGNS THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF SAID ASSESSMENT UPON WHICH DEFAULT IS MADE, TOGETHER WITH REASONABLE ATTORNEY S FEES AND ALL COSTS AND EXPENSES OF COL- LECTION, IF INCURRED, SHALL BE AND BECOME IMMEDIATELY DUE AND PAYABLE. SECTION 7. IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY OF SAID SUMS HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST THE SAID PARCELS OF PROPERTY, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, COLLECTION THEREOF SHALL BE ENFORCED, AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, OR ITS ASSIGNS EITHER BY SUIT IN ANY COURT HAVING JURISDICTION, OR BY SALE OF THE PROPERTY ASSESSED AS NEARLY AS POSSIBLE IN THE MANNER AS MAY BE PROVIDED BY LAW IN FORCE IN SAID CITY FOR THE COLLECTION OF AD VALOREM TAXES. SECTION 8. FOR THE PURPOSE OF EVIDENCING SAID ASSESSMENTS, THE LIENS SECURING SAME AND THE SEVERAL SUMS ASSESSED AGAINST THE SAID PARCELS OF PROPERTY, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AND THE TIME AND TERMS OF PAY- MENT, AND AID IN THE ENFORCEMENT THEREOF, ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES SHALL BE ISSUED BY THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, TO THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI I UPON THE COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SAID SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS IN ANY UNIT OR PORTION OF STREET ABOVE DEFINED, WHICH CERTIFICATES SHALL BE EXECUTED BY THE MAYOR IN THE NAME OF THE CITY, ATTESTED BY THE CITY SECRETARY WITH THE CORPORATE SEALS AND WHICH SHALL DECLARE THE AMOUNTS OF SAID ASSESSMENTS AND THE TIMES AND TERMS THEREOF, THE RATE OF INTEREST THEREON THE DATE OF THE COMPLETION AND THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR WHICH THE CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED; AND SHALL CONTAIN THE NAME OF THE APPARENT OWNER OR OWNERS AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY ASSESSED BY LOT AND BLOCK NUMBER OR FRONT FOOT THEREOF, OR SUCH OTHER DESCRIPTIONS AS MAY" OTHERWISE IDENTIFY THE SAME, AND IF THE SAID PROPERTY SHALL BE OWNED BY AN ESTATE OR FIRM, THEN TO SO STATE THE FACT SHALL BE SUFFICIENT AND NO ERROR OR MISTAKE IN DESCRIBING ANY SUCH PROPERTY OR IN GIVING THE NAME OF ANY OWNER OR OWNERS, OR OTHERWISE SHALL IN ANYWISE INVALIDATE OR IMPAIR THE ASSESSMENT LEVIED HEREBY OR THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED IN EVIDENCE THEREOF. THE SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL FURTHER PROVIDE SUBSTANTIALLY THAT IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY INSTALLMENT OF PRINCIPAL OR INTEREST WHEN DUE, THEN AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI OR ITS ASSIGNS OR THE HOLDER THEREOF, THE WHOLE OF SAID ASSESSMENT EVIDENCED THEREBY SHALL AT ONCE BECOME DUE AND PAYABLE AND SHALL BE COLLECTIBLE WITH REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES AND ALL EXPENSES AND COSTS OF COLLECTIONS IF INCURRED; AND SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL SET FORTH AND EVIDENCE THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS OF SUCH PROPERTY, WHETHER NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED THEREIN OR NOTE AND THE LIEN UPON SUCH PROPERTY AND THAT SAID LIEN IS FIRST AND PARAMOUNT THEREON, SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER LIENS TITLES AND CHARGES EXCEPT FOR LAWFUL AD VALOREM TAXES, FROM AND AFTER THE DATE SAID IMPROVEMENTS WERE ORDERED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, AND SHALL PROVIDE IN EFFECT, THAT IF DE- FAULT SHALL-BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT THEREOF, THE SAME MAY BE ENFORCED, AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI OR ITS ASSIGNS, EITHER BY THE SALE OF THE PROPERTY THEREIN DESCRIBED IN THE MANNER PROVIDED FOR THE COLLECTION OF AD VALOREM TAXES AS ABOVE RECITED, OR BY SUIT IN ANY COURT HAVING JURISDICTION. SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL FURTHER RECITE IN EFFECT THAT ALL THE PRO- CEEDINGS WITH REFERENCE TO MAKING SAID IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN REGULARLY HAD IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW IN FORCE IN SAID CITY AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY, AND THAT ALL PREREQUISITES TO THE FIXING OF THE ASSESS- MENT LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY AND THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE REAL AND -9- TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF EVIDENCED BY SUCH CERTIFICATES, HAVE BEEN REGULARLY DONE AND PERFORMED, WHICH RECITALS SHALL BE EVIDENCE OF ALL THE MATTERS AND FACTS SO RECITED, AND NO FURTHER PROOF THEREOF SHALL BE REQUIRED IN ANY COURT. SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL FURTHER PROVIDE IN EFFECT THAT THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, SHALL EXERCISE ALL OF ITS LAWFUL POWERS, WHEN REQUESTED SO TO DO BY THE HOLDER OF SAID CERTIFICATES, TO AID IN THE ENFORCEMENT AND COLLECTION THEREOF, AND SAID CERTIFICATES MAY CONTAIN OTHER AND FURTHER RECITALS PERTINENT AND APPROPRIATE THERETO. IT SHALL NOT BE NECESSARY THAT SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL BE IN THE EXACT FORM AS ABOVE SET FORTHI BUT THE SUBSTANCE AND EFFECT THEREOF SHALL SUFFICE. SECTION 9. ALL SUCH ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ARE, AND SHALL BE A PERSONAL LIABILITY AND CHARGE AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS OF SAID ABUTTING PROPERTIES NOTWITHSTANDING SUCH OWNER OR OWNERS MAY NOT BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED, AND ANY IRREGULARITY IN THE NAME OF THE PROPERTY OWNER, OR THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY PROPERTY OR THE AMOUNT OF ANY ASSESSMENT, OR IN ANY OTHER MATTER OR THING SHALL NOT IN ANYWISE INVALIDATE OR IMPAIR ANY ASSESSMENT LEVIED HEREBY OR ANY CERTIFICATE ISSUED, AND ANY SUCH MISTAKE; OR ERROR] INVALIDITY OR IRREGULARITY WHETHER IN SUCH ASSESS- MENT OR IN THE CERTIFICATES ISSUED IN EVIDENCE THEREOF, MAY BED BUT IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE; IN ORDER TO BE ENFORCEABLE, CORRECTED AT ANY TIME BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS. , THE TOTAL AMOUNTS ASSESSED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE UNITS OR PORTIONS OF STREETS ABOVE SET OUT, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF ARE THE SAMEp OR LESS THAN, THE ESTIMATES OF SAID ASSESSMENTS PREPARED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, AND ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID CITY RELATIVE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS THEREFOR, AND WITH THE TERMS, POWERS AND PROVISIONS OF SAID CHAPTER 106 OF THE ACTS OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE 40TH LEGISLATURE, KNOWN AS ARTICLE I105B, VERNON'S TEXAS CIVIL STATUTES AS AMENDED, AND ARTICLE IX, -70- 4 SECTION 6 OF THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY, UNDER WHICH TERMS, PROVISIONS AND POWERS OF SAID ACTS SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS WERE HAD AND MADE BY SAID CITY COUNCIL. SECTION 10. THE IMPORTANCE TO THE PUBLIC'OF DETERMINING THE ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PROPERTY OWNERS AND THEREBY ENABLING CONSTRUCTION TO PROCEED AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE CREATES A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND AN IMPERATIVE PUBLIC NECESSITY REQUIRING THE SUSPENSION OF THE CHARTER RULE THAT NO ORDI- NANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE OF ITS INTRODUCTION AND THAT SUCH ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE SEVERAL MEETINGS OF THE CITY "COUNCIL, AND THE MAYOR, HAVING DECLARED THAT SUCH'EMERGENCY AND NECESSITY EXIST, HAVING REQUESTED THAT SUCH CHARTER RULE BE SUSPENDED AND THAT THIS ORDINANCE-BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE OF ITS INTRODUCTION AND TAKE EFFECT AND BE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT FROM AND AFTER ITS PASSAGE, IT IS ACCORDINGLY SO ORDAINED, THIS THE WDAY'OF NOVEMBER, 1965. ATTEST: (MAYOR THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS CI SECRE AR ' APPROVED AS TO EGAL FORM THIS 5._j DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1965: ,#X,5:,CITY ATTORNEY - CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DAY OF TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE OF THE FORE- GOING ORDINANCE, A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND IMPERATIVE NECESSITY EXIST FOR THE SUSPENSION OF THE CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT THAT NO ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED, AND THAT SUCH ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL; I, THEREFORE, HEREBY REQUEST THAT YOU SUSPEND SAID CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT AND PASS THIS ORDINANCE FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRO- DUCED, OR AT THE PRESENT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL. RESPECTFULLY, MAYOR�(Q� THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS THE CHARTER RULE WAS SUSPENDED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: DR. MCIVER FURMAN '�✓ JACK BLACKM ON ✓/ PATRICK J. DUNNE DR. P. JIMENEZ, JR. KEN MCDANIEL BONNIE $IZEMORE WM. H. WALLACE THE ABOVE ORDINANCE WAS PASSED BY THE FOLLOWIN VOTE: DR. MCIVER FURMAN JACK BLACKMON PATRICK J. DUNNE DR. P. JIMENEZ, JR. KEN MCDANIEL RONNIE SIZEMORE WM. H. WALLACE 1A