HomeMy WebLinkAbout07935 ORD - 03/09/1966• r u
AN ORDINANCE
e
CLOSING THE HEARING GIVEN TO THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF
PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SOUTH STAPLES STREET FROM GOLLIHAR
ROAD TO LEXINGTON BOULEVARD; GOLLIHAR ROAD FROM SOUTH STAPLES
STREET TO CADDO STREET; MCARDLE,ROAD FROM SOUTH STAPLES TO
ZARSKY STREET; AND MCARDLE, NORTHWESTERLY 130 FEET FROM SOUTH
STAPLES STREET AS TO SPECIAL BENEFITS TO ACCRUE TO SAID
PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF-BY VIRTUE
OF THE IMPROVEMENT OF SAID STREETS WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED,
AND AS TO ANY ERRORS, AND INVALIDITIES OR IRREGULARITIES IN
ANY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OR CONTRACT THEREOF, OVERRULING AND
DENYING ALL PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS OFFERED, EXCEPT THE
CHANGES REFLECTED HEREIN, FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE
PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS
DEFINED, WILL BE SPECIALLY BENEFITED AND ENHANCED IN VALUE
IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS
PROPOSED TO BE AND AS HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST SAID PROPERTY
ABUTTING UPON A PORTION OF SOUTH STAPLES STREET, GOLLIHAR
ROAD AND MCARDLE ROAD, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, AND
LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT FOR THE PAYMENT OF A PORTION OF THE
COST OF IMPROVEMENTS „SON SAID STREETS, WITHIN SAID LIMITS,
FIXING A CHARGE AND LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON
SAID STREETS AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, PROVIDING
FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES UPON THE COM-
PLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SAID WORK, THE MANNER AND TIME OF
PAYMENT AND PROVIDING THE MANNER AND METHOD OF COLLECTION
OF SAID ASSESSMENTS AND CERTIFICATES; AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, THE CITY COUNCIL OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, BY DULY
ENACTED ORDINANCE PASSED AND APPROVED ON FEBRUARY 16, 1966, DETERMINED
THE NECESSITY FOR, AND ORDERED THE IMPROVEMENT OF A PORTION OF SOUTH
' STAPLES STREET, FROM GOLLIHAR TO LEXINGTON; A PORTION OF GOLLIHAR FROM
SOUTH STAPLES TO CADDO; A PORTION OF MCARDLE FROM STAPLES TO ZARSKY; AND
MCARDLE, 130 FEET NORTHWESTERLY FROM STAPLES, WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREINAFTER
' S•
DEFINED, IN THE MANNER AND ACCORDING TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
HERETOFORE APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL BY ORDINANCE'DATED
FEBRUARY 16, 1966, SAID PORTION OVAID STREETS TO BE IMPROVED BEING'S
ri •
AS FOLLOWS, TO -WIT: 0 -
• +'- 1. A PORTION OF SOUTH STAPLES STREET, FROM GOLLIHAR ROAD
TO LEXINGTON BOULEVARD;
'+'Z. A PORTION OF GOLLIHAR ROAD FROM SOUTH STAPLES STREET TO
CADDO STREET;
' 3. A PORTION OF MCARDLE ROAD, FROM SOUTH STAPLES STREET
TO ZARSKY STREET; AND
11
I. MCARDLE, 130 FEET NORTHWESTERLY FROM SOUTH STAPLES '
STREET;
A DULY EXECUTED NOTICE OF SAID ORDINANCE HAVING BEEN FILED IN THE NAME
OF SAID CITY WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS; AND +
093Py c} .Y+
5
I
WHEREAS, SAID CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS, AFTER HAVING ADVERTISED FOR AND RECEIVED BIDS ON THE CONSTRUCTION
OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS FOR.THE LENGTH OF TIME AND IN THE MANNER AND FORM
AS REQUIRED BY THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY AND THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
TEXAS, AND AFTER,HAVING DULY AND REGULARLY MADE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS
AVAILABLE FOR SUCH PURPOSE TO COVER THE ESTIMATED COST OF SAID IMPROVE-
MENTS TO SAID CITY, ALL AS PROVIDED BY THE CORPUS CHRISTI CITY CHARTER
F
AND BY LAW, DID AWARD A CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID IMPROVE-
MENTS TO SOUTH TEXAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ON THEIR LOWEST AND MOST
ADVANTAGEOUS BID AND SAID CONTRACT HAS BEEN HERETOFORE DULY EXECUTED BY
SAID CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND SOUTH TEXAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND 15
DATED FEBRUARY,2, 1966, AND THE PERFORMANCE BOND REQUIRED BY SAID CON-
-
TRACT HAS BEEN PROPERLY FURNISHED BY SAID SOUTH TEXAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
AND ACCEPTED BY THE SAIDICITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY AS TO FORM AND AMOUNT
AS REQUIRED BY THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY AND THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
TEXAS; AND
w
WHEREAS, THE SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS CAUSED THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
WORKS TO PREPARE AND FILE ESTIMATES OF THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND
ESTIMATES OF THE AMOUNT PER FRONT FOOT PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST
TIE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON A PORTION OF SOUTH STAPLES STREET, A PORTION
OF GOLLIHAR ROAD AND A PORTION OF MCARDLE ROAD, WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN
DEFINED, TO BE IMPROVED, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND SAID
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS HAS HERETOFORE FILED SAID ESTIMATES AND A STATE-
MENT OF OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO WITH SAID CITY COUNCIL, AND SAME
HAS BEEN RECEIVED, EXAMINED AND APPROVED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL; AND
WHEREAS, SAID CITY COUNCIL, BY DULY ENACTED ORDINANCE DATED
FEBRUARY 16, 1966, DID DETERMINE THE NECESSITY OF LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT
FOR THAT PORTION OF THE COST OF CONSTRUCTING SAID IMPROVEMENTS ON THE
ABOVE NAMED STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFINED, TO BE PAID BY THE
ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND DID ORDER
AND SET A HEARING TO BE HELD AT 3:00 O'CLOCK P.M. ON MARCH 2, 1966, IN
THE COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CITY HALL OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, FOR THE
REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREET, WITHIN THE
-2-
K
A,
LIMITS ABOVE DEFINED, AND FOR ALL OTHERS OWNING OR CLAIMING ANY INTEREST
IN, OR OTHERWISE INTERESTED IN SAID PROPERTY, OR ANY OF SAID MATTERS
AS TO THE ASSESSMENTS AND AMOUNTS TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PARCEL
OF ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AND
AS TO THE SPECIAL BENEFITS TO ACCRUE TO SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY BY VIRTUE
OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS, IF ANY, OR CONCERNING ANY ERROR, INVALIDITY,
IRREGULARITY OR DEFICIENCY IN ANY PROCEEDINGS, OR CONTRACT, TO APPEAR
AND BE HEARD IN PERSON OR BY COUNSEL AND OFFER EVIDENCE IN REFERENCE TO
SAID MATTERS; AND SAID CITY COUNCIL DID BY SAID ORDINANCE ORDER AND
DIRECT THE CITY SECRETARY TO GIVE NOTICE OF SAID HEARING TO THE REAL AND
TRUE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREETS, WITHIN THE
LIMITS DEFINED, BY PUBLICATION IN THE CORPUS CHRISTI TIMES,THE OFFICIAL
NEWSPAPER OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, A NEWSPAPER PUBLISHED IN THE
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, OF GENERAL CIRCULATION, SAID NOTICE TO BE
PUBLISHED IN SAID NEWSPAPER AT LEAST THREE TIMES PRIOR TO THE DATE OF
SAID HEARING, THE FIRST PUBLICATION OF WHICH TO BE AT LEAST TEN (10)
DAYS PRIOR THERETO, ALL AS PROVIDED FOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS
OF SAID CITY CHARTER AND OF CHAPTER 106 OF THE ACTS OF THE FIRST CALLED
SESSION OF THE MOTH LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, KNOWN AND SHOWN
AS ARTICLE 1105B, VERNON'S ANNOTATED CIVIL STATUTES OF TEXAS; AND
WHEREAS, SAID CITY COUNCIL DID FURTHER ORDER AND DIRECT SAID
CITY SECRETARY, IN ADDITION TO SAID PUBLISHED NOTICE ASAFORESAID, WHICH
WAS PROVIDED TO BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT IN ITSELF, TO KEEP ON FILE A
COPY OF SAID DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS' REPORT, AND INCLUDE THEREIN THE
LIST OF NAMES OF THE APPARENT OWNERS, AND THE DESCRIPTIONS OF SAID
ABUTTING PROPERTY AS SET OUT IN SAID DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS' REPORT,
PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THE SAID LIST OF APPARENT OWNERS AND PROPERTY
DESCRIPTIONS SO INCLUDED IN SAID NOTICE, SHALL MERELY BE CUMULATIVE OF AND
IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SAID NOTICE AS PROVIDED BY THE LAWS
OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, AND THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS, AND SHALL NOT IN ANY MANNER BE CONCLUSIVE OF THE REAL AND TRUE
OWNERS OR OF THE CORRECT DESCRIPTIONS OF SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY NOR
LIMIT SAID NOTICE TO THE PROPERTIES DESCRIBED OR TO SUCH APPARENT OWNERS
NAMED THEREIN, BUT SAID NOTICE SHALL NEVERTHELESS BE DIRECTED TO THE
-3-
I.
I
h
REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY, WHETHER NAMED, OR CORRECTLY
NAMED THEREIN OR NOT, AND TO ALL OTHERS CLAIMING, OWNING OR INTERESTED
IN ANY MANNER IN ANY OF SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY ON SAID STREETS WITHIN
THE LIMITS ABOVE DEFINED; AND
WHEREAS, SAID NOTICE AS ORDERED AND DIRECTED BY SAID CITY
COUNCIL AND AS REQUIRED BY SAID ACTS AND CHARTER OF SAID CITY AS ABOVE
IDENTIFIED, WAS DULY GIVEN PUBLICATION OF SAME IN THE CORPUS CHRISTI
TIMES A NEWSPAPER PUBLISHED IN THE CIITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, ON
FEBRUARY 18, 1966, FEBRUARY 21, 1966 AND FEBRUARY 24, 1966, SAID NOTICE '
SO PUBLISHED BEING DIRECTED TO THE OWNERS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON
r
THE STREETS HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED;', AND
WHEREAS, AFTER DUE, REGULAR AND PROPER NOTICE THEREOF, ALL
AS PROVIDED BY LAW AND THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
SAID HEARING, OF WHICH NOTICE WAS GIVEN, WAS OPENED AND HELD ON MARCH 2,
1966, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER AT CITY HALL IN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID ORDINANCE AND NOTICE, AT WHICH TIME AN
OPPORTUNITY WAS GIVEN TO ALL SAID ABOVE MENTIONED PERSONS, FIRMS,
CORPORATIONS AND ESTATES, THEIR AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS, TO BE HEARD AND
TO OFFER EVIDENCE AS TO ALL MATTERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID ORDINANCE
AND NOTICE, AT WHICH TIME THE FOLLOWING APPEARED AND OFFERED THE FOLLOWING
TESTIMONY:
-4- 0
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
March 2, 1966
Page 10
ORDINANCE NO. 7931 x
AMENDING CORPUS CHRISTI CITY CODE, 1958, AS AMENDED BY AMEND G SECTION 21 -153
BY ADDING T HE LIST OF ONE -WAY STREETS THE FOLLOWING: WILL STREET, LAWRENCE
STREET, SCHATZ STREET AND PEOPLES STREET; PROVIDING FOR P LIGATION; AND DECLARING '
AN EMERGENCY.
�} "
G
The Charter rul gas suspended and the for oing ordinance was passed by
s
the following vote: Furman, ckmon, Dunne, imenez, McDaniel, Sizemore and
• Wallace, present and voting "Aye."
r
FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMEN G TH ORPUS CHRISTI CITY CODE, 1958, AS
AMENDED, BY AMENDING SECTION 21- 3 BY ADDIN REELY DRIVE, FROM PARADE DRIVE TO
} BELMEADE DRIVE, TO THE LIST ONE -WAY STREETS, TWEEN THE HOURS OF 8:00 A.M.
AND 5:00 P.M. ON WEEKDAYS LY; AND PROVIDING FOR LICATION.
' The foregoin ordinance was read for the first t e and passed to its
"
second reading the following vote: Furman, Blackmon, Dunne, imenez, McDaniel,
Sizemore d Wallace, present and voting "Aye."
Mayor Furman declared a brief recess before the scheduled public ring
r
x
on street assessments, during which time Mayor Furman departed.
Mayor Pro Tem. Blackmon reconvened the meeting, directed that it be noted
* that the Council was all present with the exception of Mayor Furman who had been
called away from the meeting, and announced the Council would now hold the public
hearing scheduled for 3 :00 p.m. on Assessments for the proposed street improve-
ments for a portion of South Staples Street, from Gollihar Road to Lexington
i
Boulevard; a portion of Go7lihar Road, from South Staples to Caddo Street, a
t
portion of McArdle Road from Staples to Zarsky; and McArdle, 130 Feet North-_
westerly from Staples; explained that each member of the Council had been
P
�s
presented with a Preliminary Assessment Roll; and that Tom McDowell, Assistant
' City Attorney, would conduct the public hearing.
Assistant City Attorney McDowell explained the purpose of the public
hearing and stated that the Staff would offer testimony from the City Engineer
and evaluation testimony from a real estate appraiser to substantiate the
,
assessments which appear on the Preliminary Assessment Roll, and that the hearing
was to form a basis on which the Council, acting as a legislative body, would
determine or establish the assessments on the abutting properties.
Mr. James K. Lontos, City Engineer, presented the plans for the street
• r
improvements and the Preliminary Assessment Roll; testified to the nature,
extent and specifications of the proposed improvements; the cost of construction;
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
March 2, 1966
` Page 11
the amount of cost to be borne by the City, and the amount to be assessed against
w
"the abutting property owners; the manner in which such pro rata share was computed;
and explained that South Staples Street and Gollihar Road were considered major
4
thoroughfares, and in accordance with the Master Transportation Plan, would be -67 , M
i
Feet wide. k
` Harold Carr testified as to his background and experience which he felt
qualified him as a real estate appraiser for all types of properties in this City;
testified that he had personally viewed and understood the extent and specifications',"
• 4.Y
'of the proposed improvements; that he had personally viewed within the past week
the preliminary assessment roll and each of the properties to be assessed; and that
in his opinion, each of the properties so assessed would be enhanced in value at
t least to the extent of the proposed assessments, with the following exceptions, for
which he recommended that the assessments be reduced as follows:
Item #22, R. R. Berkebile - Reduce assessment of curb, gutter and pavement
to $639.67; sidewalk assessment to $165.24; for a total assessment of $804.91;
Item #26, Robert L. Cooper - Reduce assessment of curb, gutter and pave-
.•°I:_
ment to $1,114.69; sidewalk assessment to $287.44; for a total assessment of
$1,402.13; -
Item #46, Clem Govatos - Reduce assessment of curb, gutter and pavement
to $1;667.41, for a total assessment of $2,074.34. ;
Mayor Pro Tem Blackmon stated he would call the names of the property-,,,,
owners as they are listed on,the assessment roll and invited each property�owner'r
yv,
to state his approval or objection to any of the proposed improvements or,asseas-
ments to his property. The following persons appeared: "-
Mr. John Brooke, attorney representing Wm. M. Singleterry (Item #17);'
Wm. E. Crews (Item #18); Paul Revere Russell Jr. (Item #19); M. E. MaKitrick
(Item #20); L. D. Oster (Item #21); R. R. Berkebile (Item #22); W. S. Stewart
°x (Item 03); John Glaser (Item #24); Robert L. Cooper (Item #26); and H. H. Potter
t
(Item #27); appeared before the Council and stated that these property owners had
no objection to the assessment for curbs, gutters and sidewalks, but they'did �+
object to the assessment for widening South Staples Street on the basis that there r ;
would be no enhancement to the property at all and that it would, in fact, lessen 7
the value of such property.
i•
.9W
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
March 2, 1966
Page 12
Mr. Brooke further stated that these were all residential properties;
F-
r 'that'none had access to South Staples Street; that having a wider, more heavily
traveled street actually lessened the value of the properties; and that he had
talked with several lending agencies in the City, and presented a letter from
`, ?, f
Mr. Bruce Lynn, Vice- President of Farm and Home Savings Association, relative to`;,�,
-• their loan policy on residential properties abutting on thoroughfares and stating
that it was their feeling that widening this street would have an adverse effect
in the value of any residential property so located and that it was their policy
to penalize any of these properties because of the adverse effect on initial sale
and subsequent resale value.
Attorney Brooke called Thomas Givens as a witness, who testified to his
background and experience which he felt qualified him as a real estate appraiser
for all types of properties in this City; that he had personally viewed the
properties and the preliminary assessment roll with respect to Items #17 through d
#27, exclusive of Item #25; and that in his opinion, the enhanced value of the
properties was not in accordance with the amount of the assessment against the
properties.
s
Mr. Givens stated that in making a survey along the streets that had
been widened and paved, the amount of traffic and noise reduced the value, par-
ticularly on corner lots; that the closer you bring traffic to a single family
dwelling the harder it is to find a buyer; that inside houses generally sell y
better; and that the enhancement of the properties is negligible if any, and '
that the assessments are far in excess. Mr. Givens further stated that a-surveyf
was conducted by the Society of Real Estate Appraisers several years ago, and
that although the study was never completed; it was evident to him that corner
lots did not bring the prices that the inside houses did. F
In answer to a question from Attorney McDowell relative to the property
being increased in value by the improvements, Mr. Givens replied that he dis-
r'
agreed that the property would be increased in value as all the houses had
' a
fences and very little access to that street, and that the property owners had +
maintained their portion of their property.
C
Minutes 3
Regular Council Meeting '
March 2, 1966,
Page 13
Attorney Brooke stated that his clients were not opposed to the assess-
.. �+ r
ments of curbs, gutters and sidewalks and that it would improve the value of the
properties to some extent; but that they were opposed to the widening of the street.` '
r.
In answer to questions from the Council, Mr. Givens stated that all the
properties faced the side streets entering into South Staples, and that widening„
the street would bring the traffic closer to their properties.
z Attorney McDowell asked Mr. Givens if he thought the improvement of the
street and its physical characteristics in this particular area would offset any
detriment because of noise and traffic, and Mr. Givens replied that the noise and
traffic would make it harder to sell these properties and that it might offset the
detriment but would not enhance it.
Attorney Brooke asked Mr. Carr about his statement that the properties
so assessed would be enhanced in value at least to the extent of the proposed
assessments; and Mr. Carr replied that the property owner would have a better
chance of selling as the value of the property had been enhanced by this program;
that there may be more traffic but the greater traffic would be less offensive;
i
and that the enhanced properties are less difficult to sell. Mr. Carr stated ,
that the study relative to corner lots was never adopted and that the study �.
left it up to a case of judgment. Mr. Brooke asked Mr. Carr if the basis of
t
'.: his opinion was solely on his long experience in the community, and Mr. Carr ,
replied that it was based upon his experience and that amenties were considered.
i Mr. Wm. E. Crews (Item #18) stated he was opposed to the cost of the.•
improvements and that he did not believe the property owners should pay for ,
South Staples paving as their houses did not face on this street; that it was,`
a main artery street and traveled by thousands of other persons, and inquired
about the residential cost for a business street.
City Engineer Lontos explained that $5.88 is the maximum rate for
curbs and gutters and that the actual cost for this type of paving would exceed
$ ,q.88 and that it was a limit set by the Council for residential use. City
Manager Whitney pointed out that the property owners were being assessed what
it would cost if it was an average 30 -foot street for residential use.
kF-
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
March 2, 1966
Page 14
Mr. Gerald Smith (Item #25) stated he had no specific objection to the '
-
proposed improvements.
Mr. Roy Smith (Item #28 and Items #47, #48, and #49), inquired about the
assessments on the undeveloped land that was being used for farming purposes; and
.j
stated that he had given the City some extra land for right -of -way purposes several
years ago near a point of land that Mr. Clem Govatos (Item #46) had recently 'sold
'
e '
to the City; that it might not be ethical for the City to reimburse him for the
sF.r
land; and further stated that he thought 80% assessment was too much for a
property owner to pay. f
•
Mr. Carr testified that the highest best use of the undeveloped property
°
would be a shopping center.
Mr. Joseph Hans, representing Sea Dollar Corporation (Item #30); John
W. Crevling (Item #31); Bird Pontiac (Items #32 and #33); and Jack McKenzie
Trustee (Item #52); stated that these property owners had no objection to the
improvement program but object to the preliminary assessment roll; and that in
a
i
some cases there would be more driveways and on others there would be less drive"`y
A
ways, and asked that adjustments be made.
City Manager Whitney advised that upon completion of the project a
`
corrected assessment roll was always prepared.
c
`
'
r
Attorney McDowell stated that it was his feeling that it would be less
difficult to sell a house after the abutting streets were improved; that fences
. A. t -
-
L
do not take care of noise but only the unsightly appearance of the street and .
ditches that exist now; that the properties would be much more attractive after
yy
the street is improved; and that there were more reasons and evidence for
enhancement as to the extent of the assessments, and more reasons for the
property being enhanced.
Attorney Brooke stated that if the paving assessment resulted in
}
enhancement in the value of the property, the Council had the legal right to
assess up to the amount of that economic enhancement; that if the value of the
property is not increased by every dollar assessed then the assessment was too
4`
J
r
Minutes
'
Regular Council Meeting
March 2, 1966
Page 15
high; and that the property owners were being asked to bear a substantial part of
the cost of paving a main artery street that should be borne by the public generally.
Mr. Brooke further stated that the evidence given indicated that if there was any
economic enhancement it was very slight, and if so, the Council had no legal right
to assess these property owners.
a•
Mr. C. N. McAlister (Item #44) was present but did not make any statements.,,
Attorney McDowell stated that he felt the enhancement, based on the
�Yk
physical characteristics of the properties and the street at the present time, and
t
the traffic, would be reflected in the market value of these homes, 'and that by{.
these improvements "we are making a bad situation better,"
No one else appeased to be heard in connection with the proposed street
'
improvements.
±.u:
•
Mayor Pro Tem Blackmon pointed out that conflicting opinions had been
v
given by well - qualified experts; that no decision would be made at this time on
i�
'.
the proposed assessments; and that the hearing could be closed at this time.
'
Motion by McDaniel, seconded by Wallace and passed that the hearing be �•
closed.
There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting
t;
.
was adjourned. ;0
J
r
THERE BEING NO FURTHERIESTIMONY OFFERED OR ANY FURTHER PARTIES
APPEARING TO BE HEARD, UPON PROPER MOTION, DULY SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY
CARRIED, THE SAID HEARING WAS DECLARED CLOSED; AND
WHEREAS, NO FURTHER PARTIES APPEARING AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY
BEING OFFERED AS TO THE SPECIAL BENEFITS IN RELATION TO THE ENHANCED
VALUE OF SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY AS COMPARED TO COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS
OF SAID PORTION OF SAID STREETS PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST SAID
PROPERTY, OR AS TO ANY ERRORS, INVALIDITIES OR IRREGULARITIES, IN THE
PROCEEDINGS OR CONTRACT HERETOFORE HAD IN REFERENCE TO THE PORTIONS OF
SAID STREETS TO BE IMPROVED; AND
WHEREAS, SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS HEARD EVIDENCE AS TO THE SPECIAL
BENEFITS AND ENHANCED VALUE TO ACCRUE TO SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY, AND THE
REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AS COMPARED WITH THE COST OF
MAKING SAID IMPROVEMENTS ON SAID STREETS, WITHIN THE =LIMITS ABOVE DEFINED,
AND HAS HEARD ALL PARTIES APPEARING AND OFFERING TESTIMONY, TOGETHER
WITH ALL PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS RELATIVE TO SUCH MATTERS AND AS TO ANY
ERRORS, INVALIDITIES OR IRREGULARITIES IN ANY OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND
CONTRACT FOR SAID IMPROVEMENTS, AND HAS GIVEN A FULL AND FAIR HEARING TO
ALL PARTIES MAKING OR DESIRING- TO MAKE ANY SUCH PROTEST, OBJECTION OR
OFFER TESTIMONY AND HAS FULLY EXAMINED AND CONSIDERED ALL EVIDENCE,
MATTERS, OBJECTIONS AND PROTESTS OFFERED AND BASED UPON SAID EVIDENCE,
TESTIMONY AND STATEMENTS, SAID CITY COUNCIL FINDS THAT EACH AND EVERY
PARCEL OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE PORTIONS OF SOUTH STAPLES STREET,
GOLLIHAR ROAD AND WARDLE ROAD, WITHIN THE LIMITS TO BE IMPROVED AS
HEREIN DEFINED, WILL BE ENHANCED IN VALUE AND SPECIALLY BENEFITED BY
THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS UPON THE SAID STREETS UPON WHICH
SAID PROPERTY ABUTS, IN AN AMOUNT IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT OF THE COST OF
SAID IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO BE, AND AS HEREINBELOW ASSESSED AGAINST
EACH AND EVERY SAID PARCEL OF ABUTTING PROPERTY, AND THE REAL AND TRUE
OWNERS THEREOF, AND SAID CITY COUNCIL DID CONSIDER AND CORRECT ALL
ERRORS, INVALIDITIES OR DEFICIENCIES CALLED TO ITS ATTENTION AND DID
FIND THAT ALL PROCEEDINGS AND CONTRACTS WERE PROPER AND IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY AND THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS,
UNDER WHICH THOSE PROCEEDINGS WERE BEING HAD, AND THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID
-5-
I
CITY COUNCIL HERETOFORE HAD WITH REFERENCE TO SUCH IMPROVEMENTS,AND IN
ALL RESPECTS TO BE VALID AND REGULAR; AND SAID CITY COUNCIL DID FURTHER
FIND UPON SAID EVIDENCE THAT THE ASSESSMENTS HEREINBELOW MADE AND THE
CHARGES HEREBY DECLARED AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY ON SAID PORTION OF
SAID SOUTH STAPLES STREET, GOLLIHAR ROAD AND MCARDLE ROAD, WITHIN THE
LIMITS DEFINED, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, ARE
JUST AND EQUITABLE AND DID ADOPT THE RULE OF APPORTIONMENT SET OUT
BELOW AND THE DIVISION OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN SAID
ABUTTING PROPERTIES, AND THE,REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AS
JUST AND EQUITABLE, AND AS PRODUCING SUBSTANTIAL EQUALITY CONSIDERING
THE BENEFITS TO BE RECEIVED AND THE BURDENS IMPOSED THEREBY, AND THAT
ALL OBJECTIONS AND PROTESTS SHOULD BE OVERRULED AND DENIED:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. THAT THERE BEING NO FURTHER PROTEST OR TESTIMONY
FOR OR AGAINST SAID IMPROVEMENTS, SAID HEARING GRANTED TO THE REAL AND
TRUE OWNERS OF ABUTTING PROPERTY ON SAID STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS
ABOVE DEFINED, AND TO ALL PERSONS, FIRMS, CORPORATIONS AND ESTATES,
OWNING OR CLAIMING SAME OR ANY INTEREST THEREIN, BE AND THE SAME IS
HEREBY CLOSED AND ALL"PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS, WHETHER SPECIFICALLY
MENTIONED OR NOT, SHALL BE, AND THE SAME ARE HEREBY OVERRULED AND DENIED.
SECTION 2. THAT SAID CITY.COUNCIL HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES
~
UPON THE EVIDENCE HEARD IN REFERENCE TO EACH AND EVERY PARCEL OF PROPERTY
ABUTTING UPON SOUTH STAPLES STREET, GOLLIHAR ROAD AND MCARDLE ROAD,
WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, THAT THE SPECIAL BENEFITS IN THE ENHANCED
VALUE TO ACCRUE TO SAID PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS
THEREOF, BY VIRTUE OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID
PORTION OF SAID STREETS UPON WHICH SAID PROPERTY ABUTS, WILL BE IN EXCESS
OF THE AMOUNT OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS AS PROPOSED TO BE, AND
AS HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND
TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND FINDS THAT THE APPORTIONMENT OF THE COST OF
SAID IMPROVEMENTS, AND THAT ALL ASSESSMENTS HEREINBELOW MADE ARE JUST
AND EQUITABLE AND PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL EQUALITY CONSIDERING THE BENEFITS
RECEIVED AND THE BURDENS IMPOSED THEREBY, AND ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, AND THE CHARTER PROVISIONS OF THE CITY °
t
OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, AND THAT THE PROCEEDINGS AND CONTRACT HERETOFORE
-6-
q A
HAD WITH REFERENCE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ALL RESPECTS REGULAR,
n '
PROPER AND VALID, AND THAT ALL PREREQUISITES TO THE FIXING OF THE ASSESS-
. p
MENT LIENS AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTIES, AS HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED
AND THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF,
WHETHER NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN OR NOT, HAVAIBEEN'IN ALL THINGS
REGULARLY HAD AND PERFORMED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW, CHARTER
PROVISIONS AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE SAID CITY COUNCIL.
SECTION 3. THAT IN PURSUANCE OF SAID ORDINANCE, DULY ENACTED
BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, AUTHORIZING AND ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS OF THE
ABOVE DESCRIBED STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, AND IN PURSUANCE OF
SAID PROCEEDINGS HERETOFORE HAD AND ENACTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL IN
REFERENCE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND BY VIRTUE OF THE POWERS VESTED IN SAID
CITY WITH RESPECT TO SAID STREET IMPROVEMENTS BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
TEXAS AND THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY, WITH PARTICULAR
I� REFERENCE TO CHAPTER
106 OF THE ACTS OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE MOTH LEGISLATURE OF
THE STATE OF TEXAS2 KNOWN AND SHOWN AS ARTICLE 11058 OF VERNON'S
ANNOTATED CIVIL STATUTES OF TEXAS AS AMENDED THERE SHALL BED AND IS
HEREBY LEVIED, ASSESSED AND TAXED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF
PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID PORTION OF SAID STREETS, AND AGAINST THE
REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF WHETHER SUCH REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS
BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN OR NOT,-THE SEVERAL SUMS OF MONEY
HEREINBELOW MENTIONED AND ITEMIZED OPPOSITE THE DESCRIPTION OF THE
RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF SAID PROPERTY, THE NUMBER OF FRONT FEET OF EACH
s
AND THE SEVERAL AMOUNTS ASSESSED AGAINST SAME AND THE REAL AND TRUE
OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AND NAMES OF THE APPARENT OWNERS THEREOF, ALL
AS CORRECTED AND ADJUSTED BY SAID CITY COUNCI' BEING AS FOLLOWS, TO —WIT:
4
e
v
.
ti
7
s
4
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL +
SUMMARY OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSESSMENT RATES
1. South Staples Street, from Gollihar Road to inter-
section of Lexington Blvd. r
2. Gollihar Road, from South Staples Street to Caddo
Street, and a portion of McArdle Road necessary to
completion of above streets and intersections.'
These improvements will consist generally of excavation to a width to permit the
construction of concrete curbs and gutters; 4' wide; 4" thick reinforced concrete
sidewalks; a pavement of 6" lime stabilized base; 6" compacted caliche and a
finished surface of 4" hot -mix asphaltic concrete (2.5" Type "A" and 1.5" Type "D ")
and to a width shown on the plans, generally 67' B.C. on.South Staples and Gollihar
Road and 45' B.C. on McArdle Road. ft
Credit has been allowed for all existing improvements to the full amount of the re-
placement cost, where applicable.
The assessment rates have been calculated by the unit bid price plus 6.5% engineer-
ing cost. These rates are as follows:
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, Church or School, C. G. & Pavement - $5,88 p.l.f.
r
Zoned or Used Other Than R -1 or R -2, Church or School, C. G. & Pave-
ment - $11.49 p.l.f.
8' Extra Width Pavement - $2.83 p. 1. f.
0
37' Pavement Only = $11.42 p.l.f.
Pavement, Curb and Gutter (McArdle) - $8.14 p.l.f. Where Zoned Other Than
R -1 or R -2
Sidewalk - $0.38 p.s.f.
Extra Width Sidewalk - $0.47 gs.f.
Sidewalk Edge Thickening - $0.12 p.l.f.
Driveway - $0.85 p.s.f.
Total Contract Price $256,583.04
Property Owners' Assessments 145 376.63
Cost to City
t
r
. Sheet No.
Gollihar Road Improvements From S. Staples St. to Caddo Street
South Texas Construction Co
To a pavement width of 67' B. C.
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ 5.88
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $ 11:49
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $ 0.38
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $ 0.85
Sidewalk Edge Thickening per ft. $ 0.12
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
GOLLIHJ
3 ROAD
North SidE
at Staples St.
Gerald Hines
lA
South Staples Center
541.35 IF
C. G and Pavement
u.49
$6220.11
Lot A and B
466.4o SF
2 - 35' D/W
o.85
396.44
1848.32 SF
4' Wide Sidewalk
0.38
702.36
670.11 SF
Extra Width S/W
0.47
314.95
474.67 IF
Edge Thickening
0.12
56.96
V690-T2
Caddo
Street
Golli7
r Road
South SidO
at S. Staples
2A
A. M. Salvo & Ruth P. Sparks
Sparks Tract and Re- Dedicated
R.O.W. on Gollihar Road Zoned
and Used Other Than R -1 or
R -21 100% Assessed.
273.29 IF
812.80 SF
539.00 SF
156.10 SF
171.88 IF
C. G. and Pavement
3 - 35' & 1 -15' D/17
4' Wide Sidewalk
Extra Width S/W
Edge Thickening
11.49
0.85
0.38
0.47
0.12
$3,140.10
690.88
204.82
73.37
20.63
T 129. o
3A
W. H. Reagan
Lot P.2, Portion Lot 18, Sec. 2
F.B.E.F. & G.T. r
112.35 IF
131.20 SF
377.4o SF
C. G and Pavement
1 - 18' D/W
Sidewalk
11.49
0.85
0.38
$1290.90
111.52
143.41
4545. 3
Other than R -1 or R -2 Zoned
100, Assessed.
4A
Pigott and Pigott
Lots B2 and C2, A Portion of
Lot 18, Sec. 2 F.B.E.F. & G.T.
126.0 IF
83.20 SF
C. G. and Pavement
1 - 10' D/W
11.49
0.85
$1447.74
70.72
Zoned Other than R -1 or R -2
624.0 SF
Sidewalk
0.38
237.12
100% Assessed.
#
1685 75
END GO
LIHARO ROJECT
i 4-
Sheet No. -
South Staples Street from Gollihar Road to Lexington _Blvd•
South Texas Construction Co. Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ 5,88
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $11.49
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $ 0,38
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $ 0,85
irM DESCRIPTION TOTAL
PTO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY OF AMOUNT
ASSESSED ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSED
STU bS STREET
1.
M
4
5
A. M. Salvo & Ruth P. Sparks
Sparks Tract & Rededicated
R.O.W. on Gollihar Road, Zoned
and Used B -1, 100% Assessed.
Dennis P.,Eagan
Lot Al, A portion of Lot 18,
F.B.&E.F. &G.T., Sec. 2, Zoned
and Used B -1, 100% Assessed.
Martin B. Pigott Jr.
Lots B -1 & C -1, A portion of
Lot 18, F.B.&E.F &G.T., Sec, 2,
Zoned and Used B -1, 100% Assess
V. H. Gehlbach
Unplatted Lot out of Lot 18,
A portion of F.B.&E.F. &G.T.,
Sec. 2, Zoned or Used B -1.
Gandy- Robertson Inc.
Lots 10 -D & 10 -C, Block 21,
Windsor Park 4, Zoned and
Used B -1.
*Credit given for existing side
4
160.39 IF
69.5 IF
43.4o IF
692.80 SF
*149.6 SF
130.18 IF
734.45 SF
310.72 SF
192.04 IF
590.30 SF
:d.628.16 SF
96.02 IF
295.80 SF
314.08 SF
30' P
146.14 LF
591.60 SF
444.56 SF
C.G. & Pavement
Widening Only
Curb & Gutter Onl;
2 - 35' Drive
Sidewalk
C.G. & Pavement
1 - 35' Drive )
1/2 - 35' Drive)
Sidewalk
C.G. & Pavement
1/2 of 2 -35' D/W
Sidewalk
C.G. & Pavement
1/2 - 35' Drive
Sidewalk
C.G. & Pavement
1 -35' Drive
Sidewalk
11.49 $1842.88
2.825 196.34
1.449 62.89
0.85 588.88
0.38 56.85
u.49 $1495.77
o.85 " 624.28
0.38 118.07
11.49 $22o6.54
0.85 5o4.05
0.38 238.70
11.49 Not asset
0.85 per R.0.1
0.38 went.
111.49
o.85
0.38
$1679.15
502.86
ea as
agree-
Sheet No
_month gtaQl ac 4trPPt from Collihar Road to Lexi ngt-on Blvd.
South Texas Construction Co.
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ 5.88
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $11.49
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $ 0.38
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $ 0.85
TEM
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
t0.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
6
Tramarco Corp.
Lot 10 -A, Block 21, Windsor
Park n4. Zoned and Used B -1.
100% Assessed.
125.0 LF
1233.30 SF
220.0 SF
G. and Pavement
2- 35' Drives
Sidewalk
11.49
0.85
0.38
$1436.25
1048.31
83.60
25 .1
-
LANSEDWN
DRIVE
155.02 LF
1233.30 SF
C. G. & Pavement
2 -35' Drives
7
H. 0. and R. Co.
Lot 22, Bloc 22, Windsor Park
#4, Zoned and Used B -1.
11.49
0.85
$1781.18
1048.31
340.08 SF
Sidewalk
0.38
129.23
295 .72
8
Windsor Park Church of Christ
Lots 19, 20 and 21, Block 22,
Windsor Park #4. Used As R -1
or R -2.
3o6.o IF
1278.8;; SF
968.0 SF
C.G. and Pavement
2 - 25' Drives)
1 - 24' Drive )
Sidewalk
5.88
0.85
0.38
$1799.28
1086.98
367.84
325 .10
9
R. M. Little
Lot 18, Block 22, Windsor Park
82.0 LF
C.G. and Pavement
11.49
$ 942.18
#4. Other Than R -1 or R -2.
100% Assessed
-0-
-0-
Driveway
Sidewalk
g'2.1
10
Clarence F. Bednorz
Lot 17t Block 22, Windsor
Park ft. Other Than R -1 or
82.0 IF
-O-
C.G. and Pavement
Driveway
11.49
$ 942.18
R -2.
-0-
Sidewalk
9 2.1
11
C. Raymond Barnes
Lot 16, Block 22, Windsor Park
82.0 LF
C.G. and Pavement
11.49
$ 942.18
#L4. Other Than R -1 or R -2.
-0-
-0-
Driveway
Sidewalk
942.18
�: . • Sheet No.
South Stab Street from Gollih r Ropd ,Q Lexx ngton Rlvd._
South Texas Construction Co.
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ 5.88
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $ 11.49
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per so, ft. $ 0,38
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $ 0.85
PEM
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
70.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
12
Orman and Hrissikopoulos
Lot 15, Block 22, Windsor Park
82.0 IF
C. G. & Pavement
11.49
$ 942.18
T4, Other Than R -1 or R -2.
-O-
Driveway
-O-
Sidewalk
972-. I
13
Daniel Burchers
Lot 14, Block 22, Win dsor Park
n4. Other Than R -1 or R -2.
82.0 IF
-0-
-0-
C.G. and Pavement
Driveway
Sidewalk
11.49
$ 942.18
COL
INGSWOOD DRIVE
14
E. Jackson Giles, MD
Lot 17, Block 20, Windsor Park
m4. Other Than R -1 or R -2.
100.0 IF
-0-
C. G. & Pavement
Driveway
11.49
$1149.00
-0-
Sidewalk
T1-1T9 - 0 0
15
Michel G. Frich, MD
Lot 18, Block 20, Windsor Park
n4 Other Than R -1 or R -2.
100p Assessed.
131.26 IF
-0-
-0-
C.G. & Pavement
Driveway
Sidewalk
11.49
$1508.18
150 .1
SHE
IDAN DRIVE
L6
Corous Christi Ind. School Dist
King High School
Park Plaza School Tract
R -1 or R -2 Use. 100% Assessed.
816.53 IF
-0-
3266.12 SF
C.G & Pavement
Driveway
Sidewalk
5.88
0.38
$4801.20
1241.13
0 2.33
L7
Wm. M. Singleterry
Lot 1, Block 10, Park Plaza #3,
(94.45')
Zoned and Used R -1 or R -2,
7617%o Assessed Avg.
124.0 IF
-0-
C.G & Pavement
5.88
$ 555.37
496.o SF
(377.80)
Sidewalk
0.38
143,56
9 .93
South Staples Street from Gollihdr Road to Lexington Blvd.
` South Texas Construction Co.
Sheet No.. _
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ 5.88
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $11,49
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $ 0.38
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $ 0.85
=M
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
10.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
MONEqEE
DRIVE
(103.59)
18
Wm. E. Crews
Lot 32, Block 9, Park Plaza
�2, Zoned and Used R -1 or R -2,
83,54% Assessed.
124.0 IF
-0-
C.G. & Pavement
Driveway
5.88
$609.11
496.0 SF
Sidewalk
0.38
157.46
(414.36)
W66.57
19
Paul,Revere Russel Jr. " .
Lot 1, Block 9, Park Plaza
� 2, Zoned and Used R -1 or R -2,
(98.76)
125.0 IF
C.G. and Pavement
5.88
580.71
79.01% Assessed.
-0-
Driveway
500.0 SF
Sidewalk
0.38
150.12
(395.05)
730. 3
B
HIRE DRIVE
20
M. E. McKitrick
Lot 35, Block 8, Park Plaza
(108.40)
#2, Zoned and Used R -1 or R -2,
86.7% Assessed.
125.0 LF
-0-
C.G. &Pavement
Driveway
5.88
637.39
500.0 SF
Sidewalk
0.38
164.77
(433.60)
602.16
21
L. D. Oster
Lot 1, Block 8, Park Plaza
+2, Zoned and Used R -1 or R -2,
78.59% Assessed.
(98.24)
125.0 IF
-0-
C.G.& Pavement
Driveway
5.88
577.65
500.0 SF
Sidewalk
0.38
149.32
(392.95)
726.97
ME m
ROOK DRIVE
22
R. R. Berkebile
Lot 32, Block 6, Park Plaza
� 1, Zoned and Used R -1 or R -2,
84% Assessed.
(130.20)
155.0, IF
-0-
C.G & Pavement
Driveway
5.88
765.58
620.0 SF
Sidewalk
0.38
197.90
(520.80)
963.48
-
,_i
24
25
26
27
John Glaser
Lot 1, Block 5, Park Plaza
f1, Zoned and Used R -1 or R -2,
84.28% Assessed.
Gerald Smith
Lot 37, Block 5, Park Plaza
#1, Zoned and Used R -1 or R -2,
78.41% Assessed.
Robert L. Cooper
Lot 1, Block 1, Park Plaza
71, Zoned and Used R -1 or R -2,
10& Assessed.
H. H. Potter
Lot 14, Block 6, Green Acres
Village, Zoned and Used R -1 or
R -2, 68.31% Assessed.
}Includes that portion on
Stables Street.
(87.36)
103.65 LF
-0-
414. 60 SF
( 349.42)
(94.23)
C.G. & Pavement
Driveway
Sidewalk
120.18 IF C.G. & Pavement
-0- Driveway
480.72 SF Sidewalk
(376.93)
BRADS EAN DRIVE
245.59 LF C. G. & Pavement
-0- Driveway
982.36 SF Sidewalk
Siding on McArdle Rd.
111.30 IF C. G. & Pavement
(78.97) 9.30' @ 100%
69.67',@ 68.31%
-0- Driveway
x-445.20 SF Sidewalk
(315.90)
5.88 513.68
0.38 132.78
5.88
o.38
554.07
143.23
Sheet No 6 _
South Staples Street from Gollihar Road to Lexington Blvd._
97.
South Texas Construction Co. Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ 5,88
1444.07
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.1.f. $11.49
0.38
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft.
$ 0,38
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft.
$ 0.85
TEM
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
23
W. S. Stewart
(80.30)
Lot 1, Block 6, Park Plaza
103.50 LF '
C.G. & Pavement
5.88
$472.16
n1, Zonedhand Used R -1 or R -2,
-0-
Driveway
77.58% Assessed.
1+11+.0 SF
Sidewalk
0.38
122.05
(321.18)
24
25
26
27
John Glaser
Lot 1, Block 5, Park Plaza
f1, Zoned and Used R -1 or R -2,
84.28% Assessed.
Gerald Smith
Lot 37, Block 5, Park Plaza
#1, Zoned and Used R -1 or R -2,
78.41% Assessed.
Robert L. Cooper
Lot 1, Block 1, Park Plaza
71, Zoned and Used R -1 or R -2,
10& Assessed.
H. H. Potter
Lot 14, Block 6, Green Acres
Village, Zoned and Used R -1 or
R -2, 68.31% Assessed.
}Includes that portion on
Stables Street.
(87.36)
103.65 LF
-0-
414. 60 SF
( 349.42)
(94.23)
C.G. & Pavement
Driveway
Sidewalk
120.18 IF C.G. & Pavement
-0- Driveway
480.72 SF Sidewalk
(376.93)
BRADS EAN DRIVE
245.59 LF C. G. & Pavement
-0- Driveway
982.36 SF Sidewalk
Siding on McArdle Rd.
111.30 IF C. G. & Pavement
(78.97) 9.30' @ 100%
69.67',@ 68.31%
-0- Driveway
x-445.20 SF Sidewalk
(315.90)
5.88 513.68
0.38 132.78
5.88
o.38
554.07
143.23
97.
5.88
1444.07
0.38
373.30
1817.
5.88
0.38
,fir"
464.34
120.04
South Staples Street from Gollihar Road to Lexington Blvd._
South Texas Construction Co
Sheet No
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ 5.88
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.1.f. $1.49
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $ 0.38
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $ 0.85
TEM
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
N0.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
ZAR
KY DRIVE
28
Joslin -Smith
Lot A - 308.83 L.F.
25.00 IF
C. G. & Pavement
8.14
$ 203.50
Lot B - 119.20 L.F.
Lot C - 284.36 L.F.
Lot D - 357.91 L.F.
1070.30 IF
2370.00 SF
I
C. G. & Pavement
2 - 35' Driveway)
1 - 25' Driveway)
11.49
0.85
12,297.75
2,014.50
Out of Lot 1, Sec. 13 and Lot
3842.80 SF
Sidewalk
0.38
1,46o.26
8, Sec. 3 F.B.E.F. &G.T.
71-579-7-G.- 0-1
Mt. Vernon Shopping Center
Zoned and Used Other Than
R -1 or R -2, 100% Assessed.
29
Humble Oil & Refining Co.
Lot G. Mt. Vernon +3, Zoned'
141.65 IF
C. G. & Pavement
11.49
$1627.56
Other Than R -1 or R -2, 1046
1235.4'; SF
2 - 35' Driveways
0.85
1050.09
Assessed.
286.60 SF
Sidewalk
0.38
108.91
27 •5
Includes that portion siding o
McArdle Roa
.
LE
GTON BLVD.
STAPLES
STREET
AUTdTOWN
DRIVE
VEST
SIDE
30
Sea Dollar Corp.
Lot 3, Block 1, Parkdale Auto-
town, Zoned Other Than R -1
or R -2, 1004p Assessed
60.64 LF
89.36 IF
705.40 SF
C. G. & Pavement
Additional Width
2 - 35' Driveway
11.49
2.825
0.85
$696.76
252.44
599.59
320.0 SF
Sidewalk
0.38
121.60
1 70.39
31
John W. Crevling
Lot 2, Block 1, Parkdale Auto-
287.75 LF
C. G. & Pavement
11.49
$3306.25
town, Zoned Other Than R -1 or
-0-
Driveway
R -2, 10Y Assessed.
1151.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.38
437.38
37 3. 3
Sheet No. _
South Staples Street from Gollihar Road to Lexington Blvd. _
South Texas Construction Co. Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ 5.88
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $11.49
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $ 0.38
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $ 0.85
:TEM
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
32
Bird Pontiac
Lot 1, Block 1, Parkdale Auto-
287.75 LF
' C. G. & Pavement
11.49
$3306.25
tiown, Zoned Other Than R -1
or R -2, 100% Assessed.
-0-
1151.0 SF
Driveway
Sidewalk
0.38
437.38
$3743.-63—
33
Bird' Pontiac
Lot 10 -B, Block 23, Windsor
112.89 LF
C. G. & Pavement
11.49
$1297.11
Park ,+4, Zoned and Used Other
Than R -1 or R -2, 100% Assessed
763.20 SF
171.56 SF
2 - 35' Driveway
Sidewalk
0.85
0.38
648.72
65.19
2011.02
34
Sam J. Racile
Lot 10 -A, Block 23, Windsor
*135.0 IF
Pavement Only
11.42
•1541.70
Park rr4, Zoned Other Than
-0-
Driveway
R -1 or R -2, 100°% Assessed.
-0-
Sidewalk
* Additional Width Roadway
LANSDOWN
DRIVE
35
Continental Oil Co.
Lot 1, Block 24, Windsor
**155.02
Pavement Only
11.42
$1770.33
Park #L4, Zoned and Used Other
-0-
Driveway
Than R -1 or R -2, 100% Assessed
-0-
Sidewalk
X1770.33
36
Faith Assembly of God Church
Lots 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, Block
470.0 IF
C. G. & Pavement
5.88
$2763.60
22, Windsor Park +4, Used as
R -1 or R -2, 100% Assessed.
431.60 SF
-'1204.0 SF
1 - 25' Driveway
Sidewalk
0.85
0.38
366.86
457.52
35 7.9
37
ti
Robert`H. Weatherley Jr.
Lot 7, Block 22, Windsor
82.0 IF
C. G. & Pavement
11.49
$942.18
Park 114, Zoned Other Than R -1
or R -2, 100% Assessed.
-0-
-0-
Driveway
Sidewalk
**Additional Width Roadway
9 2.1
*Credit for Existing Sidewalk
Sheet No. —
_ South Staples Street from Gollihar Road to Lexington -Blvd___
South Texas Construction Co. Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ 5.88
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $ 11.49
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $ .38
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $ .85
LTEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL
NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY OF AMOUNT
ASSESSED ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSED
38 D. I. Coogin
Lot 8, Block 24, Windsor 82.0 IF C. G. & Pavement 11.49 $ 942.18
Park 7T4, Zoned Other Than R -1 -0- Driveway
or R -2, 100116 Assessed. -0- Sidewalk
9 2.1
39 0. B. Vaughan, DDS
Lot 9, Block 24, Windsor 82.0 IF C. G. & Pavement 11.49 942.18
Park 7'T4, Zoned Other Than -0- Driveway
R -1 or R -2, 100% Assessed. -0- Sidewalk
942.18
39A J. B. Peterson
Lot 1, Block 25, Windsor Park 100.0 LF C. G. & Pavement 11.49 1149.00
n4, Zoned Other Than R -1 or -0- Driveway
R -2, 100'% Assessed. -0- Sidewalk
9
11 .00
COLLI GSWOOD DRIVE
40 W. H. Hammonds
Lots 2, 3 and 4, Block 25, 223.95 IF C. G. & Pavement 11.49 2573.19
Windsor Park #4, Zoned Other -0- Driveway
Than R -1 or R -2, 100% Assessed. -0- Sidewalk
2573.19
41 W. L. Lundgren Tr.
Part of Block 27 & Part of 892.29 IF C. G. & Pavement 11.49 10,252.41
Block 28, Sec. 2, F.B.E.F. &G.T. -0- Driveway
-0- Sidewalk
10,252.'1,
41A Corpus Christi Theatres
300' out of Block 27, Sec. 2, 300.0 LF C. G. & Pavement 11.49 3447.00
F.B.E.F. &G.T. -0- Driveway
-0- Sidewalk
i
• Sheet No. -
South Staples Street from Gollihar Road to Lexington Blvd.
South Texas Construction Co.
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $ 5.88
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f. $11.49
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $ 0.38
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. £t. $ 0.85
.TEM
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
NO.
01MI R & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
42
Trinity Methodist Church
Lot 2, Park Plaza Annex,
405.46 IF
C.G. & Pavene nt
5.88
$2384.11
Used R -1, 100p Assessed
SF
1 - 25' Driveway
0.85
389.05
1521.84 SF
Sidewalk
0.38
578.30
$3351•
43
Robert Currie
Block 26, Sec. 2, F.B.E.F. &G.T.,
335.60 IF
C. G. & Pavement
11.49
3856.o4
100% Assessed.
-0-
Driveway
-0-
Sidewalk
3856.04
44
C. N. McAlister
Lot "B ", Out of Lot 26,
74.01 IF
C. G. & Pavement
11.49
850.38
Sec. 2, F.B.E.F. &G.T.
573.80 SF
1 - 35' Driveway
0.85
487.73
156.04 sF
Sidewalk
0.38
59.30
1397.41
45
N. E. Shamoon
Lot "A ", A Portion of Lot 26,
75.97 LF
C. G. & Pavement
11.49
872.90
Sec. 2, F.B.E.F. &G.T.
841.10 SF
2 - 35' Driveway
0.85
714.94
103.88 SF
Sidewalk
0.38
39.48
1627-32
46
Clem Govatos
•398 ac. out of Lots 25 & 26,
Sec. 2, F.B.&E.F. &G. Tract
175.52 IF
C. G. & Pavement
(67' B.C.)
11.49
2016.72
*25.52 IF
C. G. & Pavement
8.14
207.73
(45' B.C.)
-0-
Driveway
702.08 SF
Sidewalk
0.38
266.79
2491.2
*Includes that portion of McArdle
Road 45'
C.
_
i
Sheet No. _
South Stanles'Street from Gollihar Road to Lexington Blvd. __
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft.
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft.
TEM
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
NO.
OTNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
47
Joslin -Smith
Lot "G ", Mount Vernon Shopping
175.02 IF
C. G. & Pavement
11.49
$2010.98
Center
-0-
Driveway
0.85
-0-
Sidewalk
2010.9
*130.37 IF
C. G. & Pavement
8.14
1061.21
-o-
Driveway
-0-
Sidewalk
48
Joslin -Smith
1061.21
Lot "H ", Mount Vernon
249.43 LF
C. G. & Pavement
11.49
2865.95
Shopping Center
-0-
Driveway
-0-
Sidewalk
49
Joslin -Smith
2 5.95
Acreage Unplatted - Part of
709.8o IF
C. G. & Pavement
11.49
8155.60
Lots 1 thru 8, Sec. 3, F.B.&
-0-
Driveway
E.F.&G. Tract
-0-
Sidewalk
d155.60
50
Texaco Inc.
Lot J, Mount Vernon Shopping
125.0 IF
C. G. & Pavement
11.49
1436.25
Center
1235.40 SF
2 - 35' Driveway
0.85
1050.09
220.0 SF
Sidewalk
0.38
83.60
*That portion siding on McArdle
Road.
2569797--
LEXIN
TON BLVD.
Total Contract Price
$256,583.04
Property Crmers'Assessment
City's Portion
•
145 376.63
I
• ' Sheet No..
South Staples Street - Widened Section Only '
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.£. $
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
LEM
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
d0.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
STAPLES STREET
- -EAST SIDE
190 -00' IF
Pavement Widening
51
Gerald Hines, Block A,
South Staples Center
2.83
$537.70
$537.70
Only
i W6T
SIDE
52
Jack McKenzie Tr., Block 2
Parkdale Autotown
2.83
$820.70
290.00 IF
Pavement Widening
Only
671.60 SF
1 - 25' Driveway
0.85
570.86
1 - 30' Driveway
1112.0 SF
Sidewalk
0.38
422.56
1 1 .12
+ SECTION 4. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED THAT IN THE EVENT THE
ACTUAL FRONTAGE OF ANY PROPERTY HEREIN ASSESSED SHALL BE FOUND UPON THE
COMPLETION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS TO BE GREATER OR LESS THAN THE NUMBER OF
FEET HEREINABOVE STATED, THEASSESSMENTS HEREIN SET AGAINST ANY SUCH PROPERTY
AND AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, SHALL BE, AND THE
SAME ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE INCREASED OR DECREASED AS THE CASE MAY
BE, IN THE PROPORTION WHICH SAID EXCESS OR DEFICIENCY OR FRONTAGE SHALL
BEAR TO THE WHOLE NUMBER OF FRONT FEET OF PROPERTY ACTUALLY IMPROVED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE FRONT FOOT RULE OR RATE OF ASSESSMENT HEREIN ADOPTED,
IT BEING THE INTENTION THAT EACH PARCEL OF PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE
OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF ABUTTING ON THE PORTION OF THE STREETS ABOVE
DESCRIBED, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, SHALL PAY FOR SAID IMPROVEMENTS
UNDER THE "FRONT FOOT RULE OR PLAN ", WHICH RULE OR PLAN IS HEREBY FOUND
AND DETERMINED TO BE JUST AND EQUITABLE AND TO PRODUCE A SUBSTANTIAL
EQUALITY, HAVING IN VIEW THE SPECIAL BENEFITS TO BE RECEIVED AND THE
' BURDENS IMPOSED THEREBY; AND IT IS FURTHER ORDAINED THAT UPON FINAL
COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS ON SAID PORTIONS OF SOUTH
STAPLES STREET, GOLLIHAR ROAD AND MCARDLE ROAD, ALL CERTIFICATES HEREIN-
AFTER PROVIDED FOR, ISSUED TO EVIDENCE SAID ASSESSMENTS AGAINST SAID
PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREETS, AND THE REAL AND TRUE
OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, SHALL BE ISSUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, AND SHALL
EVIDENCE THE ACTUAL FRONTAGE OF SAID PROPERTY ANDTHE ACTUAL COST OF SAID -"
IMPROVEMENTS, THE AMOUNT NAMED IN SAID CERTIFICATE IN NO CASE TO EXCEED
THE AMOUNT HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST SUCH PROPERTY UNLESS SUCH INCREASE
BE CAUSED BY AN EXCESS OF FRONT •FOOTAGE OVER THE AMOUNT HEREINABOVE
STATED, SUCH ACTUAL COST AND SUCH ACTUAL NUMBER OF FRONT FEET, IF DIFFERENT
FROM THE HEREINABOVE SHOWN IN SECTION 3 HEREOF, TO BE DETERMINED BY THE
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS UPON COMPLETION OF SAID WORK ON SAID STREETS,
AND THE FINDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SHALL BE FINAL AND BINDING
UPON ALL PARTIES CONCERNED.
•k
SECTION 5. THAT THE SEVERAL SUMS MENTIONED ABOVE IN SECTION
3 HEREOF ASSESSED AGAINST SAID PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTT4NG ON THE PORTION
r b' . X174
OF{SOUTH STAPLES STREET, GOLLIHAR ROAD AND MCARDLE ROAD, WITHIN THE
t
S,
r
• r t•
LIMITS DEFINED, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, WHETHER NAMED OR
CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN OR NOT, SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 4
HEREOF, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST THEREON AT THE RATE OF FIVE PERCENT (5%)
PER'ANNUM'WITH REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S-FEE AND ALL COSTS AND EXPENSES OF
COLLECTION, IF INCURRED, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE MADE A FIRST AND
PRIOR LIEN UPON THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY, AGAINST WHICH SAME
ARE ASSESSED FROM AND AFTER THE DATE SAID IMPROVEMENTS WERE ORDERED BY
SAID CITY COUNCIL, TO -WIT: FEBRUARY 16, 1966, AND A PERSONAL LIABILITY
AND CHARGE AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, WHETHER OR
NOT SUCH OWNER OR OWNERS BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN, AND THAT
SAID LIEN SHALL BE AND CONSTITUTE THE FIRST AND PRIOR ENFORCEABLE CLAIM
AGAINST THE PROPERTY ASSESSED AND SHALL BE A FIRST AND PARAMOUNT LIEN
SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER LIENS, CLAIMS OR TITLE, EXCEPT FOR LAWFUL AD VALOREM
TAXES; AND THAT THE SAME SO ASSESSED SHALL BE PAYABLE AS FOLLOWS, TO -WIT:
SIXTY (6O) EQUAL MONTHLY INSTALLMENTS, THE FIRST OF WHICH WILL BE PAYABLE
ON OR BEFORE TWENTY (20) DAYS AFTER THE COMPLETION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS
TO THE STREETS UPON WHICH THE RESPECTIVE PROPERTY ABUTS, AND ACCEPTANCE
THEREOF BY THE SAID CITY COUNCIL, THE REMAINING INSTALLMENTS TO BE DUE
AND PAYABLE, RESPECTIVELY, ONE EACH MONTH BEGINNING SIXTY (6O) DAYS
AFTER THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE, DEFERRED PAYMENTS TO BEAR INTEREST FROM
DATE OF SAID ACCEPTANCE AT THE RATE OF FIVE PERCENT (5 %) PER ANNUM,
PAYABLE MONTHLY CONCURRENTLY WITH EACH OF SAID INSTALLMENTS; PAST DUE
INSTALLMENTS OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST TO BEAR INTEREST AT THE SAME RATE
PER ANNUM UNTIL PAID; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT ANY OWNER OF SUCH PROPERTY
SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO PAY OFF THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF SUCH ASSESSMENT, OR
ANY INSTALLMENT THEREOF, BEFORE MATURITY, BY PAYING PRINCIPAL AND
ACCRUED INTEREST TO DATE OF SAID PAYMENT; AND PROVIDED, FURTHER, THAT
IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY INSTALLMENT OF PRINCIPAL
OR INTEREST WHEN DUE, THEN THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF SAID ASSESSMENT UPON
WHICH SUCH DEFAULT IS MADE, SHALL, AT THE OPTION OF SOUTH TEXAS CONSTRUC-
TION COMPANY, THEIR SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, BE, AND BECOME IMMEDIATELY
DUE AND PAYABLE AND SHALL BE COLLECTIBLE TOGETHER WITH REASONABLE
Y "Y�
ATTORNEYS FEES AND ALL COSTS AND EXPENSES OF COLLECTION, IF INCURRED.
x �
-9-
SECTION 6. THAT THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI TEXAS SHALL NOT
IN ANY MANNER BE LIABLE FOR THE PAYMENT OF ANY SUMS HEREBY VALIDLY ASSESSED
AGAINST ANY ABUTTING PROPERTY, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF,
BUT SOUTH TEXAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY SHALL LOOK SOLELY TO SUCH PROPERTY AND
THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE SUMS
VALIDLY ASSESSED AGAINST SAID RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY, BUT SAID
CITY SHALL BE OBLIGATED TO FURNISH SOUTH TEXAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY VALID
ASSESSMENTS AND ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATES AND SHALL EXERCISE ALL OF ITS LAW-
FUL POWERS AND AID IN THE ENFORCEMENT AND COLLECTION OF SAID LIENS AND
ASSESSMENTS; AND IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY OF SAID
SUMS HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST THE SAID PARCELS OF PROPERTY AND THE REAL
AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF COLLECTION THEREOF SHALL BE ENFORCED
AT THE OPTION OF SOUTH TEXAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, THEIR SUCCESSORS OR
ASSIGNS, EITHER BY SUIT IN ANY COURT HAVING JURISDICTION OR BY SALE OF
THE PROPERTY ASSESSED AS NEARLY AS POSSIBLE IN THE MANNER AS MAY BE PRO-
VIDED BY LAW AND CHARTER IN FORCE IN SAID CITY FOR THE SALE OF PROPERTY
FOR THE COLLECTION OF AD VALOREM TAXES.
SECTION 7. THAT FOR THE PURPOSE OF EVIDENCING SAID ASSESSMENTS
THE LIENS SECURING SAME AND THE SEVERAL SUMS ASSESSED AGAINST THE SAID
PARCELS OF PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AND
THE TIME AND TERMS OF PAYMENT, AND TO AID IN THE ENFORCEMENT THEREOF,
ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES SHALL BE ISSUED BY THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS, TO SOUTH TEXAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY UPON THE COMPLETION OF SAID
IMPROVEMENTS IN SAID STREETS AND ACCEPTANCE THEREOF BY SAID CITY COUNCIL,
WHICH CERTIFICATES SHALL BE EXECUTED BY THE MAYOR IN THE NAME OF THE CITY,
ATTESTED BY THE CITY SECRETARY WITH THE CORPORATE SEAL OF SAID CITY, AND
WHICH CERTIFICATES SHALL DECLARE THE AMOUNTS OF SAID ASSESSMENTS AND THE
TIMES AND TERMS THEREOF THE RATE OF INTEREST THEREON THE DATE OF THE
COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR WHICH THE CERTIFICATE
IS ISSUED, AND SHALL CONTAIN THE NAMES OF THE APPARENT TRUE OWNER OR
OWNERS AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
ASSESSED BY LOT AND BLOCK NUMBERS OR FRONT FOOT THEREOF, OR SUCH OTHER
DESCRIPTION AS MAY OTHERWISE IDENTIFY THE SAME; AND IF THE SAID PROPERTY
am
SHALL BE OWNED BY AN ESTATE OR FIRM, THEN TO SO STATE THE FACT SHALL BE
SUFFICIENT AND NO ERROR OR MISTAKE IN DESCRIBING SUCH PROPERTY OR IN GIVING
THE NAME OF ANY OWNER OR OWNERS, OR OTHERWISE, SHALL IN ANYWISE INVALIDATE
OR IMPAIR THE ASSESSMENT LEVIED HEREBY OR THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED IN EVIDENCE
THEREOF.
THAT THE SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL FURTHER PROVIDE SUBSTANTIALLY
THAT IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY INSTALLMENT OF PRINCIPAL
OR INTEREST WHEN DUE THEN AT THE OPTION OF SOUTH TEXAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,
qrTHEIR SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, OR THE HOLDER THEREOF, THE WHOLE OF SAID ASSESS-
MENT EVIDENCED THEREBY SHALL AT ONCE BECOME DUE AND PAYABLE, AND SHALL BE
COLLECTIBLE WITH REASONABLE ATTORNEYS FEES AND ALL EXPENSES AND COSTS OF
COLLECTION, IF INCURRED, AND SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL SET FORTH AND EVIDENCE
THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS OF SUCH PRO-
PERTY, WHETHER NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED THEREIN OR NOT, AND THE LIEN UPON
SUCH PROPERTY, AND THAT SAID LIEN IS FIRST AND PARAMOUNT THEREON, SUPERIOR
TO ALL OTHER LIENS, TITLES AND CHARGES, EXCEPT FOR LAWFUL AD VALOREM TAXES,
FROM AND AFTER THE DATE SAID IMPROVEMENTS WERE ORDERED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL,
TO -WITS FEBRUARY 16, 1966, AND SHALL PROVIDE IN EFFECT THAT IF DEFAULT SHALL
BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT THEREOF, THE SAME MAY BE ENFORCED, AT THE OPTION OF
SOUTH TEXAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, OR THEIR SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, BY THE
SALE OF THE PROPERTY THEREIN DESCRIBED IN THE MANNER PROVIDED FOR THE COL-
LECTION OF AD VALOREM TAXES AS ABOVE RECITED, OR BY SUIT IN ANY COURT HAVING
JURISDICTION.
THAT SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL FURTHER RECITE IN EFFECT THAT ALL
THE PROCEEDINGS WITH REFERENCE TO MAKING SAID IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN
REGULARLY HAD IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW AND CHARTER IN FORCE IN SAID CITY
AND THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY, AND THAT.ALL PRE-
REQUISITES TO THE FIXING OF THE ASSESSMENT LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY THEREIN
DESCRIBED, OR ATTEMPTED TO BE DESCRIBED, AND THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE
REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, EVIDENCED BY SUCH CERTIFICATES, HAVE
BEEN REGULARLY DONE AND PERFORMED, WHICH RECITALS SHALL BE EVIDENCE; OF ALL
THE MATTERS AND FACTS SO RECITED AND NO FURTHER PROOF THEREOF SHALL BE RE-
QUIRED IN ANY COURT.
Im
THAT ALL SAID CERTIFICATES MAY HAVE COUPONS ATTACHED THERETO IN
EVIDENCE OF EACH OR ANY OF THE SEVERAL INSTALLMENTS THEREOF WHICH MAY BE
SIGNED WITH THE FACSIMILE SIGNATURES OF THE MAYOR AND CITY SECRETARY.
' THAT SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL FURTHER PROVIDE IN EFFECT THAT THE
I
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS,SHALL EXERCISE ALL OF ITS LAWFUL POWERS
r
WHEN REQUESTED SO TO DO BY THE HOLDER OF SAID CERTIFICATE, TO AID IN THE
ENFORCEMENT AND•COLLECTION THEREOF, AND SAID CERTIFICATES MAY CONTAIN OTHER
AND FURTHER RECITALS, PERTINENT AND APPROPRIATE THERETO. IT SHALL NOT BE
iKECESSARY THAT SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL BE IN THE EXACT FORM AS ABOVE SET
FORTH, BUT THE SUBSTANCE AND EFFECT THEREOF SHALL SUFFICE.
SECTION H. THAT ALL SUCH ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ARE A PERSONAL LIA-
BILITY AND CHARGE AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY
DESCRIBED, OR ATTEMPTED TO BE DESCRIBED, NOTWITHSTANDING SUCH OWNER OR OWNERS
MAY NOT BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED AND ANY IRREGULARITY IN THE NAME OF
THE PROPERTY OWNER, OR THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY PROPERTY OR THE AMOUNT OF ANY
ASSESSMENT, OR IN ANY OTHER MATTER OR THING SHALL NOT IN ANYWISE INVALIDATE
OR IMPAIR`ANY ASSESSMENT LEVIED HEREBY OR ANY CERTIFICATE ISSUED, AND SUCH
MISTAKE, OR ERRORS INVALIDITY OR IRREGULARITY WHETHER IN SUCH-ASSESSMENT OR
IN THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED IN EVIDENCE THEREOF MAY BED BUT IS NOT REQUIRED
TO BE, TO BE ENFORCEABLE, CORRECTED AT ANY TIME BY THE SAID CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS. FURTHER THAT THE OMISSION OF SAID IM-
PROVEMENTS IN FRONT OF ANY PART OR PARCEL OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE AFORE-
MENTIONED STREETS, WHICH IS EXEMPT FROM THE LIEN OF SAID ASSESSMENT, SHALL
IN NO WISE AFFECT OR IMPA'IR THE VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENTS AGAINST THE OTHER
PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREETS;�AND THAT THE TOTAL AMOUNTS
ASSESSED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREETS,
WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFINED] AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF,
ARE THE SAME ASS OR LESS THAN, THE ESTIMATE OF SAID ASSESSMENT PREPARED BY THE a
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL AND ARE
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID CITY COUNCIL RELATIVE TO SAID IM-
PROVEMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS THEREFORE AND WITH THE TERMS POWERS AND
I1�� PROVISIONS
OF SAID CHAPTER lob OF THE ACTS OF THE FIRST-CALLED SESSION OF THE MOTH
-12-
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, KNOWN AS ARTICLE 1105 —B OF VERNON'S
ANNOTATED CIVIL STATUTES OF TEXAS AND THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI, TEXAS, UNDER WHICH TERMS, POWERS AND PROVISIONS SAID PROCEEDINGS,
SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS WERE HAD AND MADE BY SAID CITY COUNCIL.
SECTION 9. THE FACT THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STREETS HAVE BECOME
AN IMPORTANT THOROUGHFARE AND THE FACT THAT THE PRESENT CONDITION OF SAID
STREETS,WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, IS DANGEROUS TO THE HEALTH AND PUBLIC
r
i
WELFARE OF THE INHABITANTS THEREOF CREATES A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND AN IM-
PERATIVE PUBLIC NECESSITY, REQUIRING THE SUSPENSION-OF THE CHARTER RULE
THAT NO ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE OF ITS
INTRODUCTION, AND THAT SAID ORDINANCE SHALL BE READ AT THREE (3) SEVERAL
MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THE MAYOR HAVING DECLARED THAT SUCH EMER-
GENCY AND,IMPERATIVE PUBLIC NECESSITY EXISTS, AND HAVING REQUESTED THAT SAID
CHARTER RULE BE SUSPENDED, AND THAT THIS ORDINANCE BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE
DATE OF ITS INTRODUCTION, AND THAT THIS ORDINANCE TAKE EFFECT AND BE IN FULL
FORCE AND EFFECT FROM AND AFTER ITS PASSAGE, IT IS SO ORDAINED, THIS THE
DAY OF MARCH, 1966.
ATTE/ �v1
R'plo• em
c THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
CI $ CRET RY
APPROVED AS LEGAL FORM T
9TH A OF MAR 4 ,9676: _
s• ,� CITY ATTORNEY
iA
I
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
�J � J A,
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
IDAY OF 190
I' FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE OF THE FORE-
GOING ORDINANCE, A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND IMPERATIVE NECESSITY EXIST FOR
THE SUSPENSION OF THE CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT THAT NO ORDINANCE OR
RESOLUTION SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED, AND THAT
SUCH ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE MEETINGS OF THE CITY
COUNCIL; I, THEREFORE, HEREBY REQUEST THAT YOU SUSPEND SAID CHARTER RULE
OR REQUIREMENT AND PASS THIS ORDINANCE FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRO -
DUCED, OR AT THE PRESENT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
RESPECTFULLY,
tAp
YOR no-
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
THE CHARTER RULE WAS SUSPENDED BY THE FOLLOWIN VOTES
DR. MCIVER FURMAN
JACK BLACKMON
PATRICK J. DUNNE
DR. P. JIMENEZ, JR.
KEN MCDANIEL \
RONNIE SIZEMORE
WM. H. WALLACE
THE ABOVE ORDINANCE WAS PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
DR. MCIVER FURMAN
JACK BLACKMON
PATRICK J. DONNE
DR. P. JIMENEZ, JR.
KEN MCDANIEL
RONNIE SIZEMORE
WM. H. WALLACE