HomeMy WebLinkAbout08812 ORD - 03/20/1968JKH: 3 -19 -68
TEXAS:
AN ORDINANCE
CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING GIVEN TO THE REAL AND TRUE
OWNERS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE HEREINAFTER
NAMED STREETS IN TIE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS,
TO -WIT:
1. CARROLL LANE, GOLLIHAR ROAD TO S. STAPLES STREET,
EAST SIDE ONLY;
2. MCARDLE ROAD, EVERHART ROAD TO DODY STREET, SOUTH
SIDE ONLY;
3. NUECES BAY BOULEVARD, UPRIVER ROAD TO I.H. 37,
SOUTH SIDE ONLY;
4. SONORA STREET, BLAKE STREET TO PORT AVENUE, NORTH
SIDE ONLY;
5. RUTH STREET, FRANCESCA STREET TO HARMON STREET,
NORTH SIDE ONLY;
6. FOURTEENTH STREET, 52 FEET NORTH OF ELIZABETH STREET
TO 450 FEET SOUTH OF MCKENZIE STREET, SOUTH SIDE ONLY;
7. FAIRVIEW DRIVE, UPRIVER ROAD TO FAIRFAX DRIVE, WEST
SIDE ONLY;
8. BUFORD STREET, BROWNLEE BLVD. TO LOTH STREET, NORTH
SIDE ONLY;
9. COMANCHE, 19TH STREET TO PORT AVENUE, SOUTH SIDE ONLY;
10. COLONIAL COURT, FAIRVIEW DRIVE TO OLD ROBSTOWN ROAD,
NORTH SIDE ONLY;
11. GUATEMOZIN, MORGAN STREET TO HIDALGO STREET, EAST SIDE
ONLY;
12. HIDALGO, GUATEMOZIN STREET TO BALBOA STREET, SOUTH
SIDE ONLY;
13. WILLIAMS DRIVE, NILE DRIVE TO AIRLINE ROAD, NORTH
SIDE ONLY;
A. HORNE ROAD, KOSTORYZ ROAD TO ONE -HALF BLOCK EAST OF
GREENGROVE, SOUTH SIDE ONLY;
FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PROPERTY ABUTTING SAID
LOCATIONS WILL BE SPECIFICALLY BENEFITTED AND ENHANCED
IN VALUE IN EXCESS OF COST OF IMPROVEMENTS, AND LEVYING
AN ASSESSMENT FOR PAYMENT; FIXING A CHARGE AND LIEN,
PROVIDING FOR ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES, THE MANNER AND
TIME OF PAYMENT; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
SECTION 1. THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS, HAS FOUND AS FOLLOWS:
(A) THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
HAS HERETOFORE BY ORDINANCE NO. 8767, ENACTED ON THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY,
1968, DETERMINED THE NECESSITY FOR AND ORDERED THE CONSTRUCTION OF
SIDEWALKS ON THE HEREINAFTER NAMED STREETS IN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS, TO -WIT:
1. CARROLL LANE, GOLLIHAR ROAD TO S. STAPLES STREET,
EAST SIDE ONLY;
2. MCARDLE ROAD, EVERHART ROAD TO DODY STREET, SOUTH
SIDE ONLY;
181-2
3. NUECES BAY BOULEVARDS UPRIVER ROAD TO I.H. 37,
SOUTH SIDE ONLY;
4. SONORA STREETS BLAKE STREET TO PORT AVENUE, NORTH
SIDE ONLY;
5. RUTH STREETS FRANCESCA STREET TO HARMON STREET,
NORTH SIDE ONLY;
6. FOURTEENTH STREETS 52 FEET NORTH OF ELIZABETH STREET
TO 450 FEET SOUTH OF MCKENZIE STREET, SOUTH SIDE ONLY;
7. FAIRVIEW DRIVES UPRIVER ROAD TO FAIRFAX DRIVE, WEST
SIDE ONLY;
8. BU FORD STREETS BROWNLEE BLVD. TO 'IOTH STREET, NORTH
SIDE ONLY;
9. COMANCHE, 19TH STREET TO PORT AVENUE, SOUTH SIDE ONLY;
10. COLONIAL COURT, FAIRVIEW DRIVE TO OLD ROBSTOWN ROAD,
NORTH SIDE ONLY;
11. GUATEMOZIN, MORGAN STREET TO HIDALGO STREET, EAST SIDE
ONLY;
12. HIDALGOS GUATEMOZIN STREET TO BALBOA STREET, SOUTH
SIDE ONLY;
13. WILLIAMS DRIVES NILE DRIVE TO AIRLINE ROAD, NORTH
SIDE ONLY;
14. HORNE ROADS KOSTORYZ ROAD TO ONE -HALF BLOCK EAST OF
GREENGROVE, SOUTH SIDE ONLY;
AND IN THE MANNER AND ACCORDING TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS THEREFOR,
WHICH PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE HERETOFORE BEEN APPROVED AND ADOPTED
BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
(B) THAT NOTICE DULY EXECUTED IN THE NAME OF THE CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI, TEXAS, OF THE ENACTMENT OF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCE HAS BEEN, TO-
WIT, ON THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1968, FILED WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF
NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS, THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI IS
SITUATED AND SUCH NOTICE HAS BEEN DULY RECORDED IN VOLUME v
PAGE_______., OF THE DEED OF TRUST RECORDS OF NUECES COUNTY TEXAS.
(C) THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CAUSED THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
TO PREPARE AND FILE ESTIMATES OF THE COSTS OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND ESTIMATES
OF THE AMOUNT PER FRONT FOOT PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE PROPERTY
ABUTTING EACH OF SAID STREETS WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFINED, AND AGAINST
THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF.
(D) THAT UPON THE FILING OF SAID ESTIMATES, THE CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI DID BY ORDINANCE DULY ENACTED ON THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARYS 1968,
PROVIDE FOR AND ORDER A HEARING TO BE HELD AT 3 O'CLOCK P.M. ON THE 13TH
DAY OF MARCH, 1968, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE CITY HALL OF THE CITY
OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, AT WHICH TIME AND PLACE ALL PERSONS, FIRMS
CORPORATIONS AND ESTATES OWNING OR CLAIMING ANY SUCH ABUTTING PROPERTY OR
ANY INTEREST THEREIN, THEIR AGENTS AND ATTORNEYSi AND ALL OTHER PERSONS
INTERESTED THEREIN, WERE TO APPEAR AND BE HEARD IN PERSON OR BY COUNSEL,
-2-
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
March 13, 1968
Page 12
nce operators, and that they had acted in good faith whe finance
was authorized.
City Manager To se at bat he plans, throug ah`dm44strative order, to immediately
ambulance one in the western part of the City since everyone agrees it is needed_`
Following a brief recess, Mayor Blackmon. reconvened the meeting, directed that it be
noted that the Council was all present with the exception of Mayor Pro Tom Sizemore, and
announced the Council would now hold the public hearing scheduled for 3.00 p.m. on assess-
ments for the proposed sidewalk improvements identified as "Sidewalk Improvements, Unit IV ",
on portions of Carroll Lane, McArdle Road, Nueces Bay Boulevard, Sonora Street, Ruth Street,
14th Street, Fairview Drive, Buford, Comanche, Colonial Court, Guatemozin, Hidalgo,
Williams Drive, Belton, and Horne Road; explained the procedure to be followed, and stated
each member of the Council had been presented with a Preliminary Assessment Roll, and that
Tom McDowell, Assistant City Attorney, would conduct the public hearing.
Assistant City Attorney McDowell explained the purpose of the public hearing and
stated that the Staff would offer testimony from the City Engineer and evaluation testimony from
a real estate appraiser to substantiate the assessments which appear on the Preliminary Assess-
ment Roll, and that the hearing was to form a basis on which the Council, acting as a legis-
lative body, would determine or establish the assessments on the abutting properties.
Mr. James K. Lantos, City Engineer pointed out on a map the location of the proposed
sidewalks, presented the plans for the improvements and the Preliminary Assessment Roll; testi-
fied as to his responsibilities as City Engineer; testified as to the nature, extent, and specifi-
cations of the proposed improvements; stated that the total contract price is $54,878.70; that
the revised figure for total assessments is $30,545.34, and revised figure for total cost to the
City is $24,333.36. Mr. Lantos explained the manner in which such pro rata share was com-
puted, and explained that the rate of assessment was based on the low bid submitted.
Mr. Bill Roberts testified as to his back ground and experience which he felt qualified
him as a real estate appraiser for all types of properties in this City; testified that he had
personally viewed and understood the extent and specifications of the proposed improvements;
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
March 13, 1968
Page 13
that he had personally viewed within the past week the preliminary assessment roll and each of
the properties to be improved and assessed; and that in his opinion, each of the properties so
assessed would be enhanced in value at least to the extent of the proposed assessment.
Property owners in the audience were given the opportunity to question Mr. Lantos and
Mr. Roberts as to specifications, and property values on which the assessments were based.
The following property owners, or representatives, appeared to seek information and to
oppose or approve the assessments on their respective properties:
Item 0206: A. J. Neff - Mr. J. B. Trimble, attorney, appeared representing Mrs. A, J.
Neff, and stated his client was opposed to the assessments on the basis that the property is
vacant and that no enhancement would be realized.
Item 061: Mr. H. E. Anderson stated he was opposed to the construction of so dewalks
and on the assessments for the reason that his property is vacant and unproductive, and that there
would be no enhancement in value.
Item 057: Ruth M. McKee, stated she objected to the timing of the project, stating that
she felt the curbs and gutters should be installed before the sidewalks, and that the improvements
should have more continuity.
Item 026: Margaret E. Perrenot stated that she was not opposed to the proposed sidewalks,
but that she felt the property owners would be more receptive to the project if the whole street,
complete with curbs and gutters, were improved.
Item 021: W. H. Eldridge stated he did not oppose the sidewalks but that he felt the pro-
ject should also include paving with curbs and gutters.
Item 069: Kethlene G. Crosby - Mr. M. Rackley appeared and stated that he had pur-
chased this property and asked that the name be changed on the assessment roll to show him as the
owner. He stated he did not oppose the improvements.
Item 1129: Mrs. Thomas E. Maddings stated she was not objecting to the proposed im-
provements, but felt the street should be paved with curbs and gutters before construction of side-
walks.
Item 030: Mr. Fritz Nelson concurred in previous statements that the entire street should
be improved with curbs and gutters.
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
March 13, 1968
Page 14
Item 028: Mrs. George Priestly stated she had bought the and had it installed in the
ditch in front of her property, and inquired if the the would be disturbed as a result of the pro-
posed Improvements. Mr. Lantos assured Mrs. Priestly that her the would not be disturbed.
Item 096: Mr. Frank Sacky appeared and stated he was definitely opposed to the im-
provements on the basis that his property is unimproved, that there is no back entrance, and that
in his opinion, the property will not be enhanced in value.
Item 0229: Mr. C. M. McMasters stated he was opposed to the sidewalks for the reason
that there is no pedestrian traffic on this street; that he would loose a valuable tree, and that he
felt the property would not be enhanced.
Item #220: D. Woods stated he was not objecting to the proposed sidewalks, but did ob-
ject to the location of them which would leave a space between the +curWine and the side-
walk, and that he preferred to have the sidewalk constructed next to the curb.
Item ®221: Louis Schmidt - City Manager Townsend stated that Mr. Schmidt had sub-
mitted an appraisal of this property purporting to show the property would not be enhanced;
Mr. Townsend referred to a memorandum dated March 8, 1968, in which the Traffic Engineer out-
lined basic reasons for sidewalk construction on the south side of Home Road between Ayers
Street and Kostoryz.
Item 0135: Mrs. W. M. Morgan stated she is opposing the sidewalk improvements on the
side street on the basis that there is no way of entering the lot except from the front, that there
is no back entrance, and that she felt the property would not be enhanced.
Item 1f210: Mrs. Frank Marobel stated she does not oppose the proposed sidewalks nor the
assessments, but pointed out the hazards of the existing deep ditches.
Item 0224: Mrs. Wayne T. Bird stated she was opposed to the assessments and the side-
walks, stating that she could not see a need for them since they were primarily for school chil-
dren and that children living on the south side of Horne Road do not have to cross Home Road to
get to school . She stated she would like to preserve the hedge bordering her property if possi-
ble.
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
March 13, 1968
Page 15
Item 0223: Mary Rendl - Mrs. Bird spoke on behalf of Mrs. Rose Tichaysky, 4202
Cambridge, and stated Mrs. Tichaysky was a cripple and could not possibly use the sidewalks,
and that it would be very difficult for her to pay for the assessments.
Item 0190: Charles Slonaker appeared and stated he approved of the proposed sidewalks
and did not object to the assessments, but requested that something be done about the 8 -foot
ditch along this road.
Item 0207: Central Assembly of God Church - A representative of the Church stated
that the members of the church are in favor of the proposed improvements, but that they would
all like to have the street improved complete with curbs and gutters; and further stated that there
are existing sidewalks in front of the property which are in good condition and requested credit
for these sidewalks.
Mr. Norwood Thames, Jr., 1645 Sprucewood, stated he was opposed to the proposed im-
provements on.the basis that there are very few school children in this neighborhood. Mr.
Thames' main complaint was the condition of the drainage ditch along this road, and suggested
that the City maintain the Williams Ditch.
A resident of Belton Street appeared and made reference to a petition previously filed
with the Council requesting that the improvements be extended to include both sides of Belton
Street including paving of the street.
No one else appeared to speak in connection with the foregoing sidewalk assessments.
Motion by McDaniel, seconded by Roberts and passed, that the hearing be closed.
There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned.
THERE BEING NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT WHO DESIRED TO BE HEARD, THE
MAYOR ANNOUNCED, THAT THE HEARING WAS CLOSED AND DIRECTED THE CITY ATTORNEY
TO PREPARE AN ORDIRANCC 114CORPORATINO THE FINDIFIGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL WHEN
MADE.
(F) THAT AT SAID HEARING NO PROTESTS, OBJECTIONS OR TESTIMONY WERE.
OFFERED AS TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS, THE CONTRACTS OR ASSESSMENTS THEREFOR, OR
AS -TO ANY OF THE PROCEEDINGS IN REFERENCE THERETO EXCEPT AS HEREINABOVE
SET OUT; THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HAS HEARD ALL PARTIES WHO APPEARED AND DESIRED
TO BE HEARD AS TO THE SPECIAL BENEFITS IN ENHANCED VALUE TO ACCRUE TO SAID
ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF AS COMPARED TO THE
PORTION OF THE COSTS OF CONSTRUCTING SAID .IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO Be
ASSESSED AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY, AND HAS HEARD ALL PARTIES APPEARING
AND OFFERING TESTIMONY, TOGETHER WITH ALL OBJECTIONS AND PROTESTS RELATIVE
TO SUCH MATTERS AND RELATIVE TO ANY ERRORS, INVALIDiT1ES OR IRREGULARITIES
JN ANY OF THE PROCEEDINGS FOR SAIO.IMPROVEMENTS, AND HAS GIVEN A FULL AND
FAIR HEARING TO ALL PARTIES MAKING OR DESIRING TO 14ARE ANY SUCH PROTEST OR
03JECTION OR TO OFFER TESTIMONY, AND HAS FULLY EXA141UW A140 CDt4ZIDERED ALL
OF SAID EVIDENCE, MATTERSS TESTIMONY AND OBJECTIONS OFFERED.
(G) THAT BASED ON THE EVIDENCE, MATTERS, TESTIMONY AHD OBJECTIONS
CONSIDERED AT SUCH HEARING THE SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPERTIES, AND EACH AND EVERY PARCEL OF SUCH PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID
SIDEWALK WILL Be ENHANCED IN VALUE AND SPECIALLY BENEFITTED IN AN A14OUNT
IN EXCESS OF THE A14OUNT OF THE COST OF SUCH 114PROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO BE,
AND AS HEREIUAFTER, ASSESSED AGAII43T EACH OF SAID PARCELS OF PROPERTY,
ABUTTING UPON SAID ALLEY, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF.
(H) THAT SAID CITY COUNCIL IS OF THE OPINION, AND FINDS THAT
EXCEPT AS MY BE VARIED THEREFROM IN THE ASSESSMENTS STET OUT IM SECTION
4 BELOW, THE FRONT FOOT PLANT OR RULE, IF UNIFORMLY APPLIED, WOULD MDT
RESULT IN INJUSTICES AND INEQUITIES BETWEEN THE DIFFERENT PARCELS OF PROPERTY
WITHIN THE SAME UNIT, TO WHICH SAID PLAN OR RULE.IS HEREBY APPLIED THAT IN
EACH OF THE CASES WHERE THE A33ESSt4ENT SET OUT IN SECTION 4 BELOW HAS BEEN
VARIED FROM THE FRONT FOOT PLAN OR RULE, SAID CITY COUNCIL 13 OF THE
OPINION, AND FINDS, THAT SAID PLAN, IF U ?71FORMD.V APPLIED WOULD RESULT IH
_h.n
INJUSTICES AND INEQUITIES BETi1EEN THE OIFFERENi PARCELS OF PROPERTY WITHIN
THE SAME UNIT) AND THE CITY COUNCIL HAS DETEMINED TO APPORTION AND
ASSESS THE COSTS IN A DIFFERENT MANNER IN SUCH PROPORTIONS AS IT DEEMS
AND F11103 TO BE JUST AMD-EQUITA ®LE, HAVING IN VIEW THE SPECIAL BENEFITS
TO TH$ ENHANCED VALUE OF THE PROPERTIES.
iJ! THAT SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS ADOPTED THE RULE OF APPORTIONMENT
AND DIVISION OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVENENTS BETWEEN SAID ABUTTING PROPER-
TIES AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF HEREIN SET FORTH AND HAS FOUND
THE SAME TO BE JUST AND EQUITABLE AM TO PRODUCE SUDSTANTIAL EQUALITY CONS.
SIDERING THE BENEFITS 1`O RE RECEIVED AND THE 13URDENS IMPOSED THEREBY) AND
SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS FURTHER FOUND UPON THE EVIDENCE CONSIDERED THAT THE
ASSESSMENT$ HEREINAFTER 14AADC AM THE CHARGES HEREEIY DECLARED AGAINST SAID
ABUTTING PROPERTIES AND THE REAL AND TRUE 02MERS THEREOF ARE JUST AND
EeVITAULE AND THAT ALL OBJECTIONS AND PROTESTS SHOULD BE OVERRULED AND
DENIED.
SECTION 2. THERE BEING NO FURTHER PROTESTS OR TElSTIRONY FOR OR
AGAINST OR IN REFERENCE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS, BENEFITS OR PROCEEDINGS, SAID
HEARING GRANTED TO THE REAL AND TRUE WJNERS OF PROPERTIES ABUTTING UPON
SAID STREET$ OR UNITS, WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFIRIED, AND ALL PERSONS,
F1R"S, CORPORATIONS AND ESTATES, OWNING OR CLAIMING SAME OR ANY INTEREST
THEREIN, SHALL BE, AND THE SAME 1$ HEREBY CLOSED, AND ALL PROTESTS AND OOa
JECTIOFIS, WHETHER SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED OR NOT, SHALL BE AND THE SAME ARE
HEREBY OVERRULED AND DENIED.
SECTIO14 j. THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES UPON THE
EVIDENCE HEARD IN REFERENCE TO EACH AND EVERY PARCEL OF PROPERTY ABUTTING
UPON THE SAID STREET$ AND UNITS HEREIN SET OUT THAT THE ENHANC04CHT IN VALUE
TO ACCRUE TO SAID PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF" BY VIRTUE
OF THE CONSTRUCTIO14 OF SAID SIDEWALKS WILL BE IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT OF
THE COSTS OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS PROPO$ED TO BE, AND AS HEREIN ASSESSED
AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTIES AND THE REAL AHD TRUE ONNER$ THEREOF) AND
FINDS THAT THE APPORTIONMENT OF THE COSTS OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS AM THE
ASSSSSMEHTS HEREMOELOW MADE ARE JUST AMID EQUITABLE AIM PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL
EQUALITY, CONSIOERINQ THE BENEFITS RECEIVED AID THE BURDENS IMPOSED TFIEREBY,
AND ARE IN ACCORDANCE ETITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE or TEXAS, AND THE 0- IARTC9
•
•
OF SAID CITY; AND FURTHER FINDS THAT ALL PROCEEDINGS AND CONTRACTS HERETO-
FORE HAD WITH REFERENCE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ALL RESPECTS REGULAR,
PROPER AND VALID, AND THAT ALL PREREQUISITES TO THE FIXING OF THE ASSESS-
MENT LIENSPGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTIES, AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AND
THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, WHETHER NAMED
OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN OR NOTE HAVE BEEN IN ALL THINGS REGULARLY HAD
AND PERFORMED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW AND THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID
CITY COUNCIL.
SECTION 4. IN PURSUANCE OF SAID ORDINANCE DULY ENACTED BY SAID
CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING AND ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID SIDEWALKS
AS HEREINBELOW SET OUT, WHICH ORDINANCE WAS PASSED, AS AFORESAID ON THE
21ST DAY OF FEBRUARYS 1968, AND IN PURSUANCE OF SAID PROCEEDINGS HERETO-
FORE HAD AND ENACTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS
AND BY VIRTUE OF THE POWERS VESTED IN SAID CITY WITH RESPECT TO SAID SIDE-
WALK IMPROVEMENTS BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS WITH PARTICULAR
REFERENCE TO CHAPTER 106, ACTS OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE 40TH
LEGISLATURES KNOWN AS ARTICLE 11056, VERNON'S TEXAS CIVIL STATUTES
AS AMENDEDs AND ARTICLE IX, SECTION 6 OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THERE SHALL BE, AND IS HEREBY LEVIED ASSESSED AND
TAXED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED
AND ABUTTING UPON THE SAID STREETS AND UNITS HEREINAFTER SET OUT AND WITH-
IN THE LIMITS BELOW DEFINED AND AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF SUCH
PROPERTY WHETHER SUCH REAL AND TRUE OWNERS BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED,
OR SAID PROPERTIES BE CORRECTLY DESCRIBED HEREIN OR NOT, THE SEVERAL
SUMS OF MONEY HEREINAFTER MENTIONED AND ITEMIZED OPPOSITE THE DESCRIP-
TION OF THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF SAID PROPERTY THE NUMBER OF FRONT FEET
OF EACH, AND THE SEVERAL94OUNTS ASSESSED AGAINST SAME AND THE REAL AND TRUE
OWNERS THEREOF, AND THE NAMES OF THE APPARENT OWNERS THEREOF ALL AS COR-
RECTED AND ADJUSTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, BEING AS FOLLOWS TO —WIT:
-6-
C]
•-
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - UNIT IV
Corrected Preliminary
March 20, 1968
This project shall be knows as "Sidewalk Improvements, Unit IV ", consist-
ing of the construction of concrete and shell sidewalks on the following
streets:
Carroll Lane - Gollihar Road to S. Staples Street - east side only
McArdle Road - Everhart Road to Dody Street - south side only
Rueces Bay Boulevard - Up River Road to I. H. 37 - south side only
Sonora Street - Blake Street to Port Avenue - north side only
Ruth Street - Francesca Street to Harmon Street - north side only
14th Street - 52' N of Elizabeth St. to 450' S of McKensie St. - south side only
Fairview Drive - Up River Road to Fairfax Drive - west side only
Buford Street - Brownlee Blvd. to 10th Street - north side only
Commanche - 19th Street to Port Avenue - south side only
Colonial Court - Fairveiw Drive to Old Robstown Road - north side only
Hildalgo - Guatemozin Street to Balboa Street - south side only
Guatemozin - Morgan St. to Hildalgo Street - east side only
Williams Drive - Nile Drive to Airline Road - north side only
Horne Road - Kostoryz Road to Greengrove Street - south side only
The assessment rates have been determined by calculating the unit bid price
on 4' wide, 4" thick reinforced concrete sidewalk as applied to the front
footage of the abutting properties:
4' wide 4" thick reinforced sidewalk @ $1.55 per front foot
5' wide 4" thick reinforced sidewalk B $1.94 per front foot
Credits have been issued for existing sidewalk in suitable condition and
location to permit present and future use.
Total Contract Price $52,814.20
Total Assessments 27 098.24
Total Cost to City $25,715.9
•
Sheet
Sidewalk jLnprovements - Unit IV _
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per Wig. ft.
Assessment Rate, §-per. ft. $ /.g¢
g'w i e ZII
"ITEM
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAi
AMOM�XT
ASSESSED
CARROLL LANE from
GOLLIHAR BDAD
to SO. STAPLE
ST.
Beginning at
- - - - --
Golliha Roa
- - - r - --
- - - - East Side —Only
- - —
1•
ELIZABETH J. HUBER
Lot 11, Block 2
54.50 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Westwood Village
(1091)
$84.48
50% assessed
2.
LISANDRO AMAYA
Lot 10, Block 2
40.48 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Westwood Village
(80.97)
$62.74
50% assessed
3.
ANTONIO C. CARRISALES
Lot 9, Block 2
25.01 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Westwood Village
(50.03)
$38.77
5o% assessed
4.
ELIZANDO R. AMAYA
Lot 8, Block 2
25.50 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Westwood Village
(51.00)
$39.53
50% assessed
5.
HARVEY B. BOATMAN
Lot 71 Block 2
25.50 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Westwood Village
(51.00)
$39.53
5o% assessed
6.
JOS. F. GREER
50' of Lot 6, Block 2
25.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Westwood Village
(50.00)
$38.75
50% assessed
• Sheet4 2 _I
Sidewalk Improvements - Unit IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p:l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
ITO,
NO.
I OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
7.
JOS. SANFILIPPO
5.49' of Lot 5 & 1' of Lot 6
25.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Block 2, Westwood Village
(50.00)
$38,75
50% assessed
8.
JORN 0. WALKER
l' of Lot 5, all Lots 4 and
49.50 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
47' of Lot 3, 50% assessed
(99.00)
$76.73
9.
ANNA GRACE PIERCE
N 4' of Lot 3 & 47' of Lot 2
25.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Block 2, Westwood Village
(50.00)
$38.75
50% assessed
10.
J. L. DAVIS
N 5' of Lot 2 & All Lot 1
32.50 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Block 2, Westwood Village
(65.00 )
$50.38
50% assessed
CO
US STREET IN5ERSECTION
11.
EUBRON TODD
All Lot 20 & 5.5' Lot 19
32.50 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Block 1, Westwood Village
(65.00)
$50'38
50/ assessed
12.
PEARL M. CRAWFORD
N 46' Lot 19 & 5.4' Lot 18
25.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Block 1, Westwood Village
(50.00)
$38-75
50% assessed
Sheet•,3_
Sidewalk Improvements - Unit IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p:l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
ITEM
N0.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSEL
13.
ARLIE P. HUGHES
N 47' of Lot 18 & 5.3' Lot 17
25.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Block 1, Westwood Village
(50.00)
$38 75
50°% assessed
14.
ENRIQUE G. MUNOZ
N 48' Lot 17 & S 2' Lot 16
25.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Block 1, Westwood Village
(50.00)
$38.75
50% assessed
15.
DONALD R. STEELE
N 49' Lot 16 & S 1' Lot 15
25.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Block 1, Westwood Village
(50.00)
$38 75
50% assessed
16.
STACEY R. BARTON
N 501 Lot 15, Block 1
25.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Westwood Village
(50.00)
$38.75
50% assessed
17•
ELSIE M. TETTLETON
Lot 14, Block 1, Westwood
25.50 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Village, 50% assessed
(51.00)
$39-53
18.
THOMAS A. CHANDLER
Lot 13, Block 1, Westwood
37.50 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Village, 50% assessed
(75.00)
$58.13
•
Sheet_
Sidewalk Improvements -
it IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Asspssmr_nt Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSEC
19.
FRANK E. TEAGUE
Lot 12, Block 1
45.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Westwood Village
(90.00)
$69.75
50% assessed
20.
A. L. MURROH
Lot 11, Block 1
19.50 L.F.
Sidewalk.
1.55
Westwood Village
(39.00)
$30.23
50% asssessed
21.
W. H. ELDRIDGE
Lot 1, Block 2
98.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Belleview 70% assessed
(140.00)
$151.90
HARRIS DRIV1
INTERSECTION
22.
JAMES T. McCRAVEY
Lot 1, Block 1, Belleview
98.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
70% assessed
(140.00)
$151.90
23.
FRANK P. BLALACK
Lot Q, Travis Addn. #3
158.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
100% assessed
$244.go
DALRAIDA DTIVE
INTERSECTION
24.
DR. W. R. BANE
Sarah Gocher 4
95.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Ac. Tract 100% assessed
$1117.25
S. BRAWNER
INTERSECTION
CITY PARK
•
Sheet_
Sidewalk Improvements - Unit IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. £t. $
ITEM
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
N. BRAWNER D
TERSECTION
25.
CARROTS, LANE SCHOOL
No property description
15.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
$ 23.25
26.
MARGARET E. PERRENOT
Lot 1, Blk. 2, Carroll Lane
Pk. 1, 80% assessed
*Credit for DAW as walk
84.00 L.F.
(105.00)
Sidewalk
1.55
$130.20
PECAN STREET
INTERSECTION
27.
MRS. STEVE RICHTER
Lot 14, Block 3, Carroll Lane
Pk. 1, 80% assessed
112.00 L.F.
(140.00)
Sidewalk
1.55
$173.60
28.
MRS. GEORGE PRIESTLY
Lot 1, Block 3, Carroll Lane
Pk. 1, 80% assessed
112.00 L.F.
(140.00)
Sidewalk
1.55
$173.60
MULBERRY STPJET
INTERSECTION
29.
TIIOS. E. MADDINGS
Lot 14, Block 4, Carroll Lane
Pk. 1, 80% assessed
112.00 L.F.
(140.00)
Sidewalk
1.55
$173.60
30.
FRITZ NELSON
Lot 1, Block 4, Carroll Lane
Pk. 2, 80°b, assessed
112.00 L.F.
(1.40.00)
Sidewalk
1.55
$273.60
COTTONWOOD S'.
INTERSECTION
•
Sheet 6
Sidewalk Improvements - Unit IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
11'E M
No,
l OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUVIT
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
31.
DONALD P. OLSON
Lot 14, Block 5, Carroll Lane
112.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Pk. 2, 80% assessed
(140.00)
$173.60
32.
K. H. BITTER
Lot 1, Block 5, Carroll Lane
112.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Pk. 2, 80% assessed
(140.00)
$173.60
CYPRESS
TREET INTERSECTIO
33.
MRS. FRANK LAZARATE
Lot 14, Block 6, Carroll Lane
112.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Pk. 2, 80% assessed
(140.00)
$173.60
34•
DOROTHY JEAN GRAHAM
Lot 1, Block 6, Carroll Lane
112.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Pk. 2, 80% assessed
(140.00)
$173.60
POPLAR SIREET
INTERSECTION
CITY PARK
MAPLE STREET
INTERSECTION
35.
BILLY BLANTON
Lot 16, Block 8, Carroll Lane
Pk. #21 100% assessed
150.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
$232.50
i
Shee0
Sidewalk Improvements - Unit IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
ITEM
NO.
I OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
36.
TRIANGLE FACILITIES, INC.
Lot 1, Block 8, Carroll Lane
100% assessed
59.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
$ 91.45
SOUTH STAPLES
INTERSECTION
Project
End Carroll lane
McARDLE R
from EVERHART
ROAD to DODY
TREET
Beginn'ng
ly
at Everhar
Road - S. Side 01
37.
F. G. EVANS
Lot 1, Block 2, Gray Village "
100% assessed
278.03 L.F
Sidewalk
1.55
$430.95
38_
STANLEY W. TOWNSEND
Lot 1, Block 2, Parklane #2
74.15% assessed
122.35 L.F
(165.00)
Sidewalk
1.55
$189,64
LDRED DRIVE
INTERSECTION
39.
JOHN BUCHI
Lot 10, Block 3, Parklane #2
74.05 assessed
87.89 L.F
(]18.69)
Sidewalk
1.55
$136.23
40.
WILLIAM H. MAHAN
Lot 9, Block 3, Parklane #2
74.15% assessed
88.16 L.F
(118.89)
Sidewalk
1.55
$136.65
BRANSCONB DRIIE
INTERSECTION
Sheet
}7 aewalx1—rovementc nni t ry
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -21 C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
N0. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL
ASSESSED OF AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSED
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
NOEL T. CHAPLIN
Lot 10, Block 4, Parklane #2
74.05% assessed
R. D. FRITH
Lot 9, Block 4, Parklane #2
74.15% assessed
CARROLL T. DRUMMOND
Lot 12, Block 5, Parklane #2
74.05% assessed
ROEL MENDEZ
Lot 11, Block 5, Parklane #2
71.14° assessed
ROY C. FENNER
Lot 1, Block 6, Parklane #2
69.35% assessed
ROY SMITH HOMES
Lot 1, Block 5, Margo Plaza
68.281 assessed
87.89 L.F. Sidewalk 1.55
(118.69)
88.16 L.F. Sidewalk 1.55
(118.89)
87.89 L.F. Sidewalk
(118.69)
84.58 L.F. Sidewalk
(118.89)
ARLENE DRIJE INTERSECTION
82.34 L.F.1 Sidewalk
(118.73)
78.59 L.F. I Sidewalk
(115,90)
1.55
1.55
1.55
1.55
$136.23
$136.65
$136.23
$131.10
$127.63
$121.81
Sheetl,L_
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - UNIT IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p:l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
_11PEM
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
4ARGO DRIVE INTERSECTION
47.
ROY SMITH HOMES
(114.11))
Lot23, Block 4, Margo Plaza
95.33 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
83.55 % Assessed
$147.76
48.
ROY SMITH HOMES
(115.10)
Lot 1, Block 4, Margo Plaza
94.96 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
82.50% assessed
$147.19
VACA DRIVE INTERSECTION
49.
ROY SMITH HOMES
(114.90)
Lot 20, Block 3, Margo Plaza
92.78 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
80.75% Assessed
$143.81
50.
JOAQUIN V. ARREDONDo
(115.10)
Lot 1, Block 3, Margo Plaza
91.73 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
79.70% Assessed
$142.18
UNITY DRIVE INTERSECTION
51.
J. L. HARRISON
(114.90)
Lot 20, Block 2, Margo Plaza
89.58 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
77.96% Assessed
$138,85
52.
CHAS H. SMITH
(115.10)
Lot 1, Block 2, Margo Plaza
88.51 L.P.
Sidewalk
1.55
76.90% Assessed
$137.19
CH DRIVE INrERSECTION
53.
ROY SMITH HOMES
(120.53)
Lot 1, Block 1, Margo Plaza
95.76 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
79.45% Assessed
$i48.4.3
54.
DILDY SUPPLY CO.
S/E 138' x 300' out of 4.64 acre
138.00 L.F.
33idewalk
1.55
Lot 1, Block 1, Byron Willis
$213.90
100% Assessed
Sheet• to
SIDEWALK 324PROVEKENTS - UNIT IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoncd & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p:l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
J.lr�� 'I
N0. I
OWNER & PROPERTY pESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
55•
MODERN HOME SUPPLY
25' Private Entrance to Lot "A"
25.00 -L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Byron Willis Tract
$ 38.75
100% Assessed
56.
cm. c. wEIKAL
(104.81)
Lot 1, Block 1, Perklane
72.96 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
69.61% Assessed
$113.09
THY DRTVE 15TERSECTION
57•
RUTH M. MCKEE
(104.78)
Lot 23, Block 2, Parklane
71.73 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
68.46% Assessed
$111.18
58•
JAMES W. KEY
(105.24)
Lot 1, Block 2, Parklane
71.13 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
67.59% Assessed
$110.25
STREET INTERSECTION
59.
GEORGE BAYDER
(104.78)
Lot 32, Block 1, Parklane
68.56 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
65.43% Assessed
$106.30
60.
SAM FERRIS
Lots 1, 2 & 3, Block 1, J. R.
104.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Chiles S/D
161.20
100% Assessed
61.
H. E. ANDERSON
50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
$ 77.50
100% Assessed
ANDERSON PIT (CITY)
PROPERTY
110 ASSESSMENT A3
OWNER
DODY STREET
END McARDIE
ROAD
• Sheet, 11 _
SIDEWALK 1MPROVEvIENTS - UNIT IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
ITEM
NO.
I
I OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
NUECES BAY BOJLFVARD
FROM UP
RIVER ROAD TO I.
H. 37
B
ginning at Up
River Road
SOUTH SIDE
ONLY
62.
L. A. FELDER
Lot 1, Alfred Barthlome`s-
260.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
area tracts
$403.00
100% Assessed
STREET
INTERSECTION
63. .IVAN
& EVERT DUPREY
Lots 4, 31 21 1, Block 12,
103.20 L F.
3idewalk
1.55
Barthlome Addn.
$159.96
100% Assessed
OPARD STREET
NTERSECTION
64.
NATIONAL BUILDING CENTERS
Lots 5 & 4, Block 6
38.86 L.F.
Lot 5= 33.38% x 113-k3'
Barthlome Addn.
20.21 L.F.
Lot 4 =34.69% x 53.26'
100% Assessed
59.07 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
$ 91.56
ANTELOPE
STREET
INTERSECTION
65.
PEARL FISCHER
(258.22)
Lots 1, 21 31 & z Lily Street
*190.95 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
R.O.W.
$295.97
*Footage Adjusted by Triangulati
n
Formula, 100% Assessed
66.
ST. JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH
Lot 5, Block 4, Barthlome &
62.76 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
z Lily Street R.O.W.
$ 97.28
100% Assessed
WRENCE DRIVE
INTERSECTION
• Sheet
SIDEWALK IMPROV51ENTS - UNTI IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
f 11�
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL,
AMOUNT
ASSESSE[
67•
WEST SIDE AUTOMOTIVE OF CORPUS C
MISTI, INC.
Lots 3, 4, & 5, Block 1
(169.69)
Barthlome Addn., 100% Assessed
*165.55 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
*All lot adjusted by
$256.60
Triangulation Formula
68.
MRS. A. B. HODGES
(85.00)
Lot 1, Block 1, Barthlome
*53.92 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
100% Assessed
$ 83.58
*All lot adjusted by Triangulati
n Formula
69.
:M. RACKLEY
Lot 1, Block 2, Barthlome
*120.00 S'.F
Sidewalk
1.55
100% Assessed
$186.00
*Calculated Footage
70.
C. J. STEVENS
Lots 9, 10, & 11, Forest Park
225.82 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Unit 2, 100% Assessed
$350.02
I. H.
37
NUECES BAT
BouLEVARD
SONORA STRET
FROM BIAKE
STREET TO PORT ATENUE
eginning at ILake
Street
NORTH SIDE
ONLY
71.
ALSTON TERRY
Lot 1, Block 1, Tom Price
49.40 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
100% Assessed
$ 76.57
72.
J. C. MARTIN TR.
Lot 2, Block 1, Tom Price
40.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
100% Assessed
$ 62.00
73.
BENNIE LEE VEAL
Lot 3, Block 1, Tom Price
40.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
1000 Assessed
$ 62.00
74.
ANTONIO G. LEAL
Lot 4, Block 17 Tom Price
40.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
$ 62.00
100% Assessed
75•
RAUL ORTIZ (100° Assessed)
Lot 5, Block 1, Tom Prica
40.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
$ 62.00
•
Sheet
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS -- UNIT IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
ITEM
NO.
I
I OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
GEM
STREET I
VEERSECTION
76.
ARMANDO ORTIZ
(70.00)
Lot 1 -A, Block 1, La Reins.
47.55 .L F.
Sidewalk
1.55
67.93% Assessed
$ 73.70
77.
REBECCA F. ORTIZ
(70.00)
Lot 1 -B, Block 1, La. Reina
47.54 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
67.91% Assessed
$ 73.69
78.
BILL TILLY
(70.00)
W. 70' Lot 22, Block 1
47.53 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
La Reina, 67.90% Assessed
$ 73,67
79•
MANUEL F. VALDEZ
(70.00)
E. 70' of Lot 22, Block 1'
47.51 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
La Reina, 67.87% Assessed
$ 73,64
SLBDM
STREET
INTERSECTION
80.
DUDLEY JONES
(140.00)
Lot 11 Block 2, La Reina
94.99 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
67.85% Assessed
$147.23
81.
JIM WILBURN
(70.00)
W. 70' Lot 22, Block 2, IaReina
47.48 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
67.83% Assessed
$ 73.59
82.
LEONEL FLORES
(70.00)
E. 70' Lot 22, Block 2, Is Reina
47.47 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
67.82% Assessed
$ 73.58
IN STREET I
UERSECTION
83,
OSCAR GARZA
216.6 x 300' out of Lot 1,
275.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Block 1, Center View Addn.
$426.25
100% Assessed
G
r OD DRIVE
INTERSECTION
•
i
Sheet 014 11
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - UNIT 1V
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
ITEM
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOK
ASSESSED
84.
DARIO DELGADO
(100.00)
Lot 18, Block 12 High Terrace
71.88 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
71.80% Assessed
$L11.41
85.
AURORA PENA
(100.00)
Lot 17, Block 1, High Terrace
59.82 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
59.82% Assessed
$ 92,72
LAMAR STREET
CTION
86.
ALEX COX
Lot 38, Block 3, High Terrace
25.51 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
100% Assessed
$ 39.54
87,
EUGENIO G. CASTILLO
Lots 36 & 37, Block 3, High
50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Terrace, 100% Assessed
$ 77,50
88.
CARLOS SMITH
Lot 35, Block 1, High Terrace
25.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
100% Assessed
$ 38,75
89.
FRANCISCO GONZALES
Lots 33 & 34, Block 3, High
50.00 L>,F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Terrace, 100% Assessed
$ 77,50
go.
OTILLIA M. CARRANZA
Lots 31 & 32, Block 3, High
50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Terrace, 100% Assessed
$ 77,50
91.
GONZALO PEDRAZA
Lot 29 & 30, Block 3, High
50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Terrace, 100% Assessed
-$ 77,50
92.
ISAIAS CASTRO
Lots 27 & 28, Block 3, High
50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Terrace, 1000 Assessed
$ .77,50
93.
ROGER DeLEON
Lots 25 & 26, Block, 3, High
50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Terrace, 100% Assessed
$ 77,50
• Sheet • 15
SIDEWALK TMPROVEMIIVTS - UNIT IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
"ITEM
Vol
I OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
ASSESSEti
SSESSE-
94.
ROMAN PEREZ
Lot 24, Block 3, High
25.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Terrace, 100% Assessed
$ 38,755
95.
JOSEPHINE REYNA
Lot 23, Block 3, High Terrace
25.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
100% Assessed
$ 38.75
96.
FRANK sACKY
Lots 21, 22, 20, & 19, Block 3,
210.57 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
High Terrace, 100% Assessed
$326.38
PORT AVEgUE
END SONORA
STREET
RUTH STREET
OM FRANCESCA
STREET TO HARMON
TREET
Beginning
at Fran
esca Street
NORTH SID
ONLY
97.
LUCY DeLaGkRZA
(100.00)
Lot 66, Block 3, San Pedro
50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
50% Assessed
$ 77,50
98.
ROSALIO A. GARCIA
(100.00)
Lots 1 & 2, Block 3, San Pedro
55.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
55% Assessed
$ 85.25
D
TARES STREET
NTERSECTION
99.
MACEDONIO MENDIETA
(100.00)
Lot 66, Block 1, San Pedro
50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
50% Assessed
$ 77.50
100.
AGAPITA LEIGA
(100.00)
Lot 1, Block 1, San Pedro
50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
50% Assessed
$ 77.50
D
CAN ST REET I
F SECTION
•
Sheet 16
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - UNIT IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.!-f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
11�
90.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUVTT
ASSESSED
101.
2nd BAPTIST CHURCH
Board of Trustees
Lots 37 thru 46, Steele Addn.,
*84.00 L F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Block 12, 100% Assessed
*Credit given for existing walls
$130.20
102.
ESEQUIEL V. BARBERA
Lots 47 & 48, Block 12
50.00 L F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Steele Addn., 100% Assessed
$ 77,50
103.
ALSTON TERRY
Lots 49 & 50, Block 12
50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Steele Addn., 100% Assessed
$ 77,50
1o4.
Maio M. PENA
Lots 51 & 52, Block 12
50.00 'L F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Steele Addn., 100% Assessed
$ 77,50
105.
C. & G. MALDONADO
Lots 53 & 54, Block 12
50.00 L F.
Sidewalk
1,55
Steele Addn., 100% Assessed
$ 77.50
106.
ANDREA GUERRERO
Lots 55 & 56, Block 12
50.00 L F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Steele Addn., 100°% Assessed
$ 77.50
107.
EUGENE E. PENA
Lots 57 & 58, Block 12
50.00 L F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Steele Addn., 100°% Assessed
$ 77.50
108.
CARLOS V. SMITH
Lots 59 & 60, Block 12
50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Steele Addn., 100°% Assessed
$ 77.50
109.
AND- Tt /AdAVALOS, JR.
Lots 61 & 62, Block 12
50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Steele Addn., 100% Assessed
$ 77.50 -
Sheet W7
SIDEWALK IMPROVEAENTS - UNIT IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
iTEM i
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
110.
ALMA M. JURECKC
Lots 63 & 64, Block 12
50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Steele Addn., 100% Assessed
$ 77.50
111.
ANDREA GUERRERO
Lots 65 & 66, Block 12
50.00 L'.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Steele Addn., 1000 Assessed
$ 77,50
112.
VICTOR MORENO
Lots 67 thru 72, Block 12
*7.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Steele Addn., 100% Assessed
$ 10.85
*Credit for existing walk
HARMON SYREET
END RUTH
STREET
14th STREET FROM 52' N.
ETH STREET
T'0 450' SOUTH
MciENZI
STREET
Be
ng at Elizabeth
Street End
SOUTH SIDE
ONLY
113.
MYRNA HOLDER
Lots 1 & 2, Block 1201, Bay
50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Terrace #2, 100% Assessed
$ 77.50
ELEZABETH
STREh11
INTERSECTION
114.
AYSON FAUSTINO
Lots 31 & 32, Block 1202, Bay
*50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Terrace #2, 100° Assessed
$ 77.50
*Credit for existing walk
115.
J. W. NELSON
Lots 29 & 30, Block 1202, Bay
*50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Terrace #2, 100% Assessed
$ 77.50
* Crredit for existing walk
116.
OPAL N. STANDRIDGE
Lots 27 & 28, Block 1202, Bay
50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Terrace h42, 100% Assessed
$ 77.50
• Sheet 018
SIDEWALK 1MPROVX%1ENTS - UNIT IV
_Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
_ Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
TTr�I
NO
I OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
117.
ESTELLE BAILEY
Lots 25 & 26, Block 1202, Bay
*50.00 I.F.
1dewalk
1.55
Terrace A, 100% Assessed
$ 77.50
*Credit for existing walk
118.
ANASTACIO FLARES
Lots 22, 23, 24, Block 1202
75.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Bay Terrace #2, 100% Assessed
$116.25
119.
MAY SPITZ
Lots 20 & 21, Block 1202, Bay
50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Terrace #2, 100% Assessed
$ 77.50
120.
TASTY BURGER
Lots 18 & 19, Block 1202, Bay
50.00 L F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Terrace #2, 100°%0 Assessed
$ 77.50
121.
EVANGELINA Y. GARZA
Lots 15, 16, 17, Block 1202
75.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Bay Terrace #2, 100°%0 Assessed
$116.25
122.
ANDREA DeSALA7AR
Lots 12, 13, 14, Block 1202
75.00 L F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Bay Terrace_#2, 100% Assessed
$116.25
123.
JOSE T. GOMEZ
Lots 10 & 11, Block 1202
50.00, L F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Bay Terrace #2, 100% Assessed
$ 77.50
124.
,JOE SPEED
Lots 8 & 9, Block 1202
50.00 L F.
31devalk
1.55
Bay Terrace jp-, 100% Assessed
$ 77.50
125.
MIGUEL L. CASTILLO
Lots 6 & 7, Block 1202
50.00 L F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Bay Terrace #2, 100% assessed
$ 77.50
126.
E. T. COX
Lots 4 & 5, Block 1202
50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
Bay Terrace, 100% Assessed
$ 77.50
1r �
u
Sheet
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - UNIT IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
127.
ANDREA T. DeRALAZAR
Lot 1, 2 & 3, Block 1202, Bay
75.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
$1.55
$116.25
Terrace 2, 100% Assessed
MC12NZIE
STREET
NTERSECTION
128.
J. R. EPPS
Lots 31 & 32, Block 1203,
50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
77.50
Fitchue Place, 100% Assessed
129.
ALICE D. HUDSON
Lots 29 & 30, Block 1203,
50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
77.50
Fitchue Place, 100% Assessed
130.
GILBERT V. SMITH
Lots 27 & 28, Block 1203,
50.00, L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
77.50
Fitchue Place, 100% Assessed
131.
ALFONSO ROMANO
Lots 25 & 26, Block 1203
50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
77.50
Fitchue Place, 100% Assessed
132.
LEOPOLDO ROMANO
Lots 23 & 24, Block 1203
50.00 L.P.
Sidewalk
1.55
77.50
Fitchue Place, 100% Assessed
133.
ADAM S. ROSALES
Lots 17 & 18, Block 1203,
50.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
77.50
Fitchue Place, 100%n Assessed
134.
STELLA WILBURN
Lots 15 & 16, Block 1203
*40.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
62.00
100% Assessed,
*Credit for existing sidewalk
END 14thS
• Sheet 20
SIDEWALK WROVEHi EDITS - UNIT 1V
Zoned ,& Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
Tr�I�
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
FAIRVIEW D
FROM UP R-TVEi
ROAD TO FAIRFAX
RIVE
B
ginning at Up
River Road
WEST SIDE
ONLY
135•
MILS. W. M..MORGAN
Lot 4-A, Barr Keeler Subd.
375.6 L.F.
Sidewalk
$1.55
$582.18
100% Assessed
136.
L. D. HUDSON
(108.05)
Lot 4, Block 1, L. A. Barnett,
54.02 L F.
Sidewalk
1.55
83.73
50% Assessed
LONTAL COURT
ENTERSECTION
137.
LEON GARR
(108.05)
Lot 51 Block 2, L. A. Burnett,
54.02 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
83.73
50% Assessed
138.
ALBERT RAHMEIER
Lot 4, Block 4, Hilltop
-38.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
58.90
Terrace, 100% Assessed
'Credit for existing walk- -not t
tal footage
139•
ARAENDo J. SAN=
Lot 5, Block 4, Hilltop
*52.00 L F.
Sidewalk
1.55
80.60
Terrace, 100% Assessed
*Credit for existing walk
140.
SESSION'S MORTGAGE CO.
Lot 6, Block 4, Hilltop
*45.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
69.75
Terrace, 100% Assessed
'Credit for existing driveway an
walk
141.
GEORGE MAREK
Lot 7, Block 4, Hilltop
*44.0o L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
68.20
Terrace, 100% Assessed
'Credit for existing driveway an
walk
142.
TOM PRIESTLEY
Lot 8, Block 4, Hilltop
80.00 L F.
Sidewalk
1.55
124.00
Terrace, 100% Assessed
FAIRFAA
DRIVE
EDO) FAIRV
TW DRIVE
• Sheet 021
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - UNIT IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
"iTEM
N0.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
` -�
BUFORD STR
MT FORM BROWN
TO 10th STREET
Beginning at
Brownlee
NORTH SIDE
ONLY
143.
FEDERICO FLORES
(132.0)
Lot 9, Block 6, Bay-view 2,
66.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
$1.55
$102.30
50% Assessed
144.
HARVEY G. HARDING
(132.0)
Lot 8, Block 6, Bay-view 2,
66.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
102.30
50% Assessed
th STREET INT1iSECTION
145.
FRED BOWMAN
(132.0)
Lots 9 & 10, Block 1
129.36 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
200.51
Baywiew 2, 98% Assessed
146.
GEORGE M. JONES
(132.0)
Lot 8, Block 1, Bayview 2
66.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
102.30
50% Assessed
11
h STREET INTEiSECTION
147.
HIPOLITO MARTINEZ
Lot 30 -A, Block 9
48.83 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
75.68
100% Assessed
148.
CHANO CONCHOrA
Lot 30 -B, Block 9
48.83 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
7 6 8
s
75.68
100% Assessed
149.
M. C. ZAMORA
Lot 30 -C, Block 9
48.83 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
7-L N
75.68
75•
1000 Assessed
150.
ELEANOR KEY
(146.5)
Lots 1 & 2, Block 9
73.25 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
113.54
Bay Terrace, 50% Assessed
10th STR
END BUFORDISTREET
• Sheet 2-
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - UNIT IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p_l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
'iIE6
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
COMANCHE STREET
FROM 19th
STREET TO PORT AV
OUE
Beginning at
Lqth Street
SOUTH SIDE
ONLY
151.
THEODORA M. GOMEZ
Lot 1, Block 1, Loma Alta
*36.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
$1.55
$ 55.80
100% Assessed
*'Credit for existing driveway
152.
GILBERTO GUTTIEREZ
Lot 3, Block 1, Loma Alta
40.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
62.00
100% Assessed
153•
JULIO AGUILAR
Lot 4, Block 1, Loma Alta
40.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
62.00
100% Assessed
154.
ADA v. CUELLAR
Lot 5, Block 1, Loma Alta
_.40.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
62.00
100% Assessed
155.
DORA L. CORONA
Lots 6, 7 & E. 20' of Lot 8,
100.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
155.00
Block 1, Loma Alta
100% Assessed
156.
MRS. NICOLOSA RIOJAS
W. 20' Lot 8 & All Lot 9,
32.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
6x•45
Block 1, Loma Alta,
*28 @ 25% -
7.0'
100% Assessed
*Credit for existing walk
157.
RAMON FLORES
Lot 10, Block 1, Loma Alta
40.00 L',F.
Sidewalk
1.55
62.00
100% Assessed
158.
SANTOS G. SAENZ
Lot 11, Block 1, Loma Alta
40.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
62.00
100% Assessed
Sheet &3 --
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - UNIT IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
ITEM
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
159•
MARIA G. RAMIREZ
Lots 12 & 13, Block 1, Alta
40.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
$1.55
$ 15.40
Lama, 100% Assessed
*(10.00)
*Credit for existing walk
16o.
MANUEL R. GARZA
Lots 14 & 15, Block 1, Loma
*72.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
111.60
Alta, 100% Assessed
*Credit for existing driveway
161.
��b6,L IRA 1, Alta Loma
40.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
15.40
1000 Assessed
*(10.00)
*Credit for existing walk
162.
BERTHA G. JIMINEZ -
Lot 17, Block 1, Lome. Alta
40.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
62.00
100% Assessed
163.
ANTONIO A. FLORES
Lot 18, Block 1, Loma Alta
40.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
62.00
100% Assessed
164.
ALFRED ROSALES
Lot 19, Block 1, Loma Alta
6�( 8.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
24.80
100% Assessed
( *8.0
*Credit for existing walk
165.
ADAM S. ROSUES
Lot 20, Block 1, Loma Alta
40.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
62.00
100% Assessed
166.
ANGELITA E. RAMIREZ
Lot 21, Block 1, Loma Alta
40.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
62.00
100% Assessed
167.
LEANDRO GONZALES
Lot 22, Block 1, Loma Alta
40.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
62.00
100% Assessed
168.
DARCIO PREZAS
Lot 23, Block 1, Loma Alta
40.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
62.00
100% Assessed
• Sheet 92k
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - UNIT IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
ITEM
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL.
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
169.
JOSE G. PREZAS
Lot 24, Block 1, Loma Alta
40.00 L F.
Sidewalk
$1.55
$ 62.00
100% Assessed
170.
ACME REFRIGERATION CO.
Lot 25, Block 1, Loma Alta
41.50 L F.
Sidewalk
1.55
64.33
100% Assessed
,HICO STREET IqTERSECTION
171.
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD
Lots 65 & 66, Los Angeles Hills
276.88 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
429.16
& 205.6' in Missouri Pacific
Improvement Co. Tr.
1000 Assessed
PORT AV
MM
END COMANCBP
STREET
COLONIAL COURT
TROM FAIRVIEW
RIVE TO OLD ROBST
WN ROAD
Be
inning at Fai
view Drive
-BORTH-STDv
ONLY
172.
L. D. HUDSON
Lot 4, Block 1, L. A. Barnett
50.00 I,.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
77.50
100% Assessed
173•
ALBINO MORENO
Lot 3, Block 1, L. A. Barnett
*80.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
124.00
100% Assessed
*Credit for existing walk
174.
ERIC M. BEALS
W. 74' of Lot 2, Block 1, L.A.
*70.00 I.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
108.50
Barnett, 100% Assessed
*Credit for existing walk
175.
LEON CARR
E. 26' Lot 2 & W. 50' Lot 1,
*72.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
111.60
Block 1, L. A. Barnett
100% Assessed
, *Credit for existing walk
L_J
Sheet 025
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - UNIT IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
ITEM
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
176.
LAMAR .TURNER.
w. 146, Lot 1, Block 1
*70.00 L.F.
Sidewalk - 5'
$1.94
$135.80
L. A. Barnett, 100% Assessed
*Credit for existing asphalt
driveway as walk
OLD ROBSTO
M ROAD
END COLONIAL
COURT
GUATEMOZINE STREET
FROM MORGAW
AVENUE TO HID
STREET
B
ginning at Morgan
Avenue
EAST SIDE
ONLY
177.
CORPUS CHRISTI SCHOOL DIST.
Stephen F. Austin School Tr.
982.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
1,522.10
100% Assessed
HIDALGO SEREET
END GUATEMOZIE
STREET
HIDALGO STREET
ROM GUATEMOZI
M STREET TO BALBO
STREET
Beg
nning at Gnat
mozine Street
SOUTH SID
E ONLY
178.
CORPUS CHRISTI SCHOOL DIST.
Stephen F. Austin School Tr.
401.21 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
621.88
100% Assessed
BALBOA S
END EIDAL
STREET
WILLIAMS DRIVE
FROM NILE
DRIVE TO AIRLINE R
AD
Beginning at S/E P/L
of Lot 1, Blo
k 8 .Woodlawn Est
tes No.
NORTH SID
P, ONLY
179.
FLOYD STRICKLAND
Lot 1, Block 8, Woodlakm Estate
*185.00 L,F.
Sidewalk
1.55
286.75
#1, 100% Assessed
*Credit for driveway as walk
•
Sheet 0 26
STDE67ALK IMMOVEMS - UNIT 1V
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p,l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
1THM
N0.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
DALY DRIVE IEFERSECTION
18'1.
HAROLD D. SMITH
Lot 1, Block 7, Woodlawn
195.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
$1.55
$302.25
Estates 1, 100% Assessed
181.
M.M. COMSTOCK
Lot 24, Block 7, 4loodlalm
195.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
302.25
Estates 1, 100% Assessed
W
DLAWN DRIVE IWIERSECTION
182.
FRANK GRAVES
Lot 1, Block 6, Woodlawn
*178.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
275.90
Estates 1, 100% Assessed
*Credit for driveway as walk
183.
GUADALUPE REYNA
Lot 24, Block 6, Woodlawn
195.00 L,F.
Sidewalk
1.55
302.25
Estates 1, 100% Assessed
C
ARE DRIVE INT
ERSECTION
184.
ARTHUR H. Dam
Lot 1, Block 5, Woodlawn
195.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
302.25
Estates 1, 100% Assessed
185•
HAROLD V. HEAL
*(85.11)
Lot 1, Block 1, Candlewood 1
55.32 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
85.75
65% Assessed
*Credit for driveway as walk
PINEWOOD
DRIVE IVTERSECTION
186.
ALBERT L. BROUGRARD
(100.00)
Lot 1, Block 2, Candlewood 1
67.87 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
105.20
67.87% Assessed
187.
JOSHUA H. HALL
(100.00)
Lot 24, Llock 2, Candlewood 1
67.87 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
105.20
67.87% Assessed
r- -I
L J
Sheet 27
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - UNIT IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p:l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
ITEM
N0.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
SPRUCEWOOD INFERSECTIOR
188.
NORMAN E. THOMAS
(100.00)
Lot 1, Block 3, Candlewood 1
67.87 L.F.
Sidewalk
$1.55
$105.20
67.87% Assessed
189.
REYmmo AYALA
(100.00)
Lot 24, Block 3, Candlewood 2
67-871.7.
Sidewalk
1.55
105.20
67.87% Assessed
CA
LEWOOD DRIVE
INTERSECTION
190.
CHARLES M. SLONAKER
(100.00)
Lot 1, Block 4, Candlewood 2
67.87 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
105.20
67.87% Assessed
191.
GENE E. PUt,LEN
(100.00)
Lot 38, Block 4,,Candlewood 3
65.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
100.75
65% Assessed
SPICEWOOD INT
0BECTION
192.
CURTIS T. ROGERS
(16.25)
Lot 1, Block 7, Candlewood 3
65.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
-25.19
_25% Assessed
193.
GLEN KING
Lot 2, Block 7, Candlewood 3
62.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
24.02
25 %,* Assessed
194.
LORAN B. GUM
(26.39)
Lot 3, Block 7, Candlewood 3
105.54 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
40.90
25/0 Assessed
195.
C.C. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST.
Sundeen School Tract
770.00 L,.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
1,193.50
AIRLINE
CAD
END WILLIA
4S DRIVE
Sheet& 28
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - UNIT IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
ITEMS 196 through 204 OMITTED BY COUNCIL ACTION
I1 NCI
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMO' A'T
ASSESSED
BELTON
3TREET FROM MC
ARTHUR TO S. H. 2
Beginning at SI
P/L of Lot aR,
Block 8 Temple
Addition
On'u V
SOUTH S
E ONLY
196.
ANICIETO G.
(96.00)
Lot =8, ple
$ tion,
54.72 L F.
Sidewalk
$1.55
$ 84.82
ed
TA STREET I
NTERSECTION
197.
(JI�yGGtiL�
BIN
(93.45)
Lot 1 oek 7, Temple
52.27 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
81.02
tion, sessed
198.
J s
(93.45)
Lo , Block 7, Temple
52.27 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
81.02
di ibn, 57% Assessed
RZYNOSA
�LL
STREET
INTERSECTION
199•
(93.46)
ZR Block 6, Temple
53.27 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
82.57
L�
200.
C/1�
TEO s.
(93.46)
Lot , lock 6, Temple
53.27 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
82.57
Assessed
BKRTRAM
STREET
LNTERSECTION
201.
De RO
(93.46)
Lot , lack 5, Temple
53.27 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
82.57
Assessed
202.
M. HNG
(93.416)
Lot , lock 5, Temple
53.27 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
82.57
5 Assessed
GARA STREET
NTERSECTION
•
Sheet & 29
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - UNIT IV
Zoned _& Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 P-1-f-$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
ITEM
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
203.
Y w�
(93.46)
, Temple
53.27 L F.
Sidewalk
$1.55
$82.57
204.
eLOS�
(41.77)
, Temple
ZW%Assess
24.12 L F.
Sidewalk
1.55
37.39
CO C 73 ACTIN
_ 19 � MS 2_00
MITTED B
DO
S. H.
Rdb
END BELTON
STREE]
HORNE ROAD
FROM KOSTORYZ
ROAD TO AYERS S
Beginning at
ostoryz
SOUTH SIDE
ONLY
205.
CARRIE KERSH
Lot 3 -N & 4-N Ava Cooper
80.00 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
124.00
100% Assessed
2o6.
A. J. NEF'F
5 -N & 6 -N Ava Cooper
81.24 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
125.92
100% Assessed
IVY LANE INTERSECTION
207.
:CENTRAL ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURGI
Lot 1, Block 1, Tower Subdivision
154.30 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
239.17
100% Assessed
208.
W. R. MARTIN
*(93.71)
Lot 1, Block 2, Cottage Park
64.14 L,F.
Sidewalk
1.55
99.42
68.44% Assessed
*Credit for driveway as walk
C
TTAGE STREET
NTERSECTION
209.
ART$URO PER EZ
(129.68)
Lot 1, Block 1, Cottage Park
103.13 L. F.
Sidewalk
1.55
159.85
79.53% Assessed
210.
FRANK MARABEL
(12 01)
Lot 29, Wooderest Hgts.
88.35 L F.
Sidewalk
1.55
136.94
• Sheet 030__
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - UNIT IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p,1-.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. it.
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
11Pi,�I
N0.
� OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
NI
OLSON S
INTERSECTION
211.
A. C. BLAKEL'v
(144.99)
)
Lot 28, Woodcrest Hgts.
119.20 L.F.
Sidewalk
$1.55
$184.76
82.21% Assessed
212.
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTEI
DAY SAINTS
Lot "A" Winters Subdivision
255.08 t<F.
Sidewalk
1.55
395.37
100% Assessed
WIMTERS
DRIVE 17fERSECTION
213.
RAYNALDO SANDOVAL
Lot 4, South Addition
62.67 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
97.14
100% Assessed
214.
CHARLIE MAJEN
Lot 3, South Addition
56.36 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
87.36
100% Assessed
215.
DAN COKER
Lot 2, South Addition
56.36 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
87.36
100% Assessed
216.
WALTER R. ELY
Lot 1, South Addition
56.36 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
87.36
1000 Assessed
217.
JOE P. BARER
Lot 10 -C, Block 2, Browning
141.28 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
218.98
Acres, 1000 Assessed
TO
SEND STREET
NTERSECTION
218.
C. W. TOWNSEND
(141.28)
Lot 13, Block 1, Browning
113.37 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
175.72
Acres, 80.25% Assessed
219.
HERBERT J. HAMBLIN
(104.46)
Lot 14, Block 2, Green Grove
69.81 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
108.21
Addition, 66.83% Assessed
- -
• Sheet *311-
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - UNIT IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
TTFMS PPn thrrnluh PAR OVTMW.n uv rnrmrr!rr_ ArTrnm
NO.
L-
i OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIIPTION
QUAWT ITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
MEEK GROVE D
TERSECTION
220.
WOODS
(104.46)
Lot Block 1, Green Grove
64.89 Ii F.
Sidewalk
$1.55
$100.58
,62'.-12%'A,ssessed
221.
I vd I S-S C %G'i��
(117-74)
Lot , ock 5, Edgewood Park
87.53 L.F
Sidewalk
1.55
135.67
rf4� Asses ed
EVON DRIVE I
TERSECTION
f�D
222.
R. MAC 0,)i a
(137.21)
Lot ock 4, Edgewood Park
115.33 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
178.76
05i Asse d
223.
�if%lL �
( 17.71)
Block 4, Edgewood Park
176
76.23 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
118.16
ssed
224.
'D CIMBRIDGE
YNE �jf�je^
DRIVI
INTERSECTION
(137.21)
Lot 3, Edgewood Park
<Asse
115.33 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
178.76
05< ed
f�
225.
'RD ERT S. JORDONrpfGG�`'��
(117.71)
LotBBr-�k 3, Edgewood Park
69.66 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
107.97
gessed
BRIqTWOOD
DRIVE
INTERSECTION
226.
bV.ITMCE E. RkRRTS �ilfl�
(137.21)
Lot ock 2, Edgewood Park
134.26 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
208.10
97.85% essed
J (0zAd, f
(158.76)
227.
Lot lock 9, Cuiper
98.15 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
152.13
6 . M% Ass ssed
ERNER DRIVE 11TERSECTION
•
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - UNIT IV
OMITTED BY COUNCIL ACTION
Sheet C--�
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p:l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
ITEM
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSES94M
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
228.
CO fly U "�
(137.97)
Lot , lock 10, Cuiper
100.36 L F.
Sidewalk
$1.55
$155.56
.74% Asse ed
D
229.
Me �f2LG
(131.70 )
Lot 1 ck 10, Cuiper
99.25 L F.
sidewalk
1.55
153.84
6% Assess d
STREET lTnRSECTION
cP
230.
BSON PROD -su
Lot-2,5,,-Block 11, Cuiper
(ll2.97)
87.81 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
136.11
Assessed
0011
231.
s C.
(106.70)
Lot ock 11, Cuiper
65.81 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
102.01
Asse d
STI STREET
ENTERSECTION
232.
E. WI C;- rjiG�/�'6i'
(112.97)
Lot lock 12, Cuiper
89.17 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
138.21
.93% Asses d
233.
p
C. csl `r
(110.0)
Lot Block 12, Cuiper
76.35 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
118.34
41 ssessed
LES STREET
NTERSECTION
//
�} <i"
234.
JESSIEE GES(n,S /✓�
(135-0)
Lot 2 c 13, Cuiper
88.47 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
137.13
Assess rr
235,
Disses.2 Olil -gef
(135.0)
Z27% , Cuiper
93.51 L.F.
Sidev.ilk
1.55
144.94
f
INN ST REET In
ERSECTION
236.
dON E. BIRD
(135.0)
Lot k 14, Cuiper
88.47 L,F.
Sidewalk
1.55
137.13
• Sheet 33
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - UNIT IV
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
OMITTED BY COUNCIL ACTION
TT'�I
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
237.
G`
(135-0)
14, Cuiper
1145% �Asd
87.01 L.F.
Sidewalk
$1.55'
$134.87
ed
CARLETON STFJET
INTERSECTION
238.
%���
(168.43)
Lot , 0k 15, Cuiper
111.60 L.F.
Sidewalk
1.55
172.98
.26% Assessed
P- `- `YUBLT
AL12Y—
END HCRNE
ROAD
END SIDEWALK
PROJECT IV
SECTION 5. THE ASSESSMENTS LEVIED IN SECTION 4 ABOVE ARE FOR A
PORTION OF THE COSTS OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS IN THE STREETS AND UNITS THEREIN
SET OUTS AND THE ASSESSMENTS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS IN SAID UNITS ARE IN
NOWISE RELATED TOE OR CONNECTED WITH, THE IMPROVEMENTS OR ASSESSMENTS IN
ANY OTHER OF THE STREETS OR UNITS DESCRIBED IN SAID ORDINANCE OR EACH OTHER;
AND IN LEVYING SAID ASSESSMENTS THE AMOUNT SO ASSESSED FOR THE IMPROVEMENT
IN SAID UNITS HAVE BEEN IN NOWISE AFFECTED BY ANY FACT OR THING IN ANY WAY
CONNECTED WITH THE IMPROVEMENTS OR THE ASSESSMENTS THEREFOR IN ANY OTHER
OF SAID UNITS. THE OMISSION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS IN ANY OF SAID STREETS OR
UNITS AS A WHOLE SHALL IN NOWISE AFFECT NOR IMPAIR THE VALIDITY OR THE
ASSESSMENTS IN ANY OTHER OF SAID UNITS AND THE OMISSION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS
IN ANY PARTICULAR STREET OR UNIT IN FRONT OF ANY PARCEL OF PROPERTY EXEMPT
FROM THE LIEN OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS OR AGAINST WHICH A VALID PROPERTY ASSESS-
MENT CANNOT BE LEVIED SHALL IN NOWISE AFFECT NOR IMPAIR THE VALIDITY OF
THE ASSESSMENTS AGAINST THE OTHER PROPERTIES IN SUCH UNIT.
SECTION 6. THE SEVERAL SUMS MENTIONED ABOVE IN SECTION 4 HEREOF,
ASSESSED AGAINST SAID PARCELS OF ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE
OWNERS OR OWNER THEREOF, WHETHER SAID OWNERS BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED
OR SAID PROPERTIES BE CORRECTLY DESCRIBED HEREIN OR NOT, TOGETHER WITH
INTEREST THEREON AT THE RATE OF SIX AND ONE -HALF PERCENT (6 -1/2 %) PER
ANNUM AND WITH REASONABLE ATTORNEYS FEES AND ALL COSTS AND EXPENSE OF
COLLECTION, IF INCURRED ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE AND MADE A FIRST AND
PRIOR LIEN UPON THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY AGAINST WHICH SAME
ARE ASSESSED FROM AND AFTER THE DATE SAID IMPROVEMENTS WERE ORDERED BY
SAID CITY COUNCIL, AND A PERSONAL LIABILITY AND CHARGE AGAINST THE REAL
AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF WHETHER OR NOT SUCH OWNER OR OWNERS
BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN, PARAMOUNT AND SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER
LIENS, CLAIMS OR TITLES EXCEPT FOR LAWFUL AD VALOREM TAXES; AND THAT
THE SUMS SO ASSESSED SHALL BE PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, OR
ITS ASSIGNS IN MONTHLY INSTALLMENTS OF NOT EXCEEDING TWENTY -FOUR (24)
IN NUMBER, SAID PAYMENTS TO BE MADE AT THE CITY HALL IN THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRIS-D, NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS THE FIRST OF WHICH SHALL BE PAY-
ABLE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE COMPLETION OF SAID
-7-
SECTION 5. THE ASSESSMENTS LEVIED IN SECTION 4 ABOVE ARE FOR A
PORTION OF THE COSTS OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS IN THE STREETS AND UNITS THEREIN
SET OUT, AND THE ASSESSMENTS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS IN SAID UNITS ARE IN
NOWISE RELATED TO, OR CONNECTED WITH, THE IMPROVEMENTS OR ASSESSMENTS IN
ANY OTHER OF THE STREETS OR UNITS DESCRIBED IN SAID ORDINANCE OR EACH OTHER;
AND IN LEVYING SAID ASSESSMENTS THE AMOUNT SO ASSESSED FOR THE IMPROVEMENT
IN SAID UNITS HAVE BEEN IN NOWISE AFFECTED BY ANY FACT OR THING IN ANY WAY
CONNECTED WITH THE IMPROVEMENTS OR THE ASSESSMENTS THEREFOR IN ANY OTHER
OF SAID UNITS. THE OMISSION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS IN ANY OF SAID STREETS OR
UNITS AS A WHOLE SHALL IN NOWISE AFFECT NOR IMPAIR THE VALIDITY OF THE
ASSESSMENTS IN ANY OTHER OF SAID UNITS AND THE OMISSION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS
IN ANY PARTICULAR STREET OR UNIT IN FRONT OF ANY PARCEL OF PROPERTY EXEMPT
FROM THE LIEN OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS OR AGAINST WHICH A VALID PROPERTY ASSESS-
MENT CANNOT BE LEVIED, SHALL IN NOWISE AFFECT NOR IMPAIR THE VALIDITY OF
THE ASSESSMENTS AGAINST THE OTHER PROPERTIES IN SUCH UNIT.
SECTION C. THE SEVERAL SUMS MENTIONED ABOVE IN SECTION 4 HEREOF,
ASSESSED AGAINST SAID PARCELS OF ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE
OWNERS OR OWNER THEREOF, WHETHER SAID OWNERS BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED
OR SAID PROPERTIES BE CORRECTLY DESCRIBED HEREIN OR NOT, TOGETHER WITH
INTEREST THEREON AT THE RATE OF SIX AND ONE -HALF PERCENT (6 -112 %) PER
ANNUM AND WITH REASONABLE ATTORNEYS FEES AND ALL COSTS AND EXPENSE OF
COLLECTION, IF INCURRED, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE AND MADE A FIRST AND
PRIOR LIEN UPON THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY AGAINST WHICH SAME
ARE ASSESSED FROM AND AFTER THE DATE SAID IMPROVEMENTS WERE ORDERED BY
SAID CITY COUNCILl AND A PERSONAL LIABILITY AND CHARGE AGAINST THE REAL
AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, WHETHER OR NOT SUCH OWNER OR OWNERS
BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN, PARAMOUNT AND SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER
LIENS, CLAIMS OR TITLES EXCEPT FOR LAWFUL AD VALOREM TAXES; AND THAT
THE SUMS SO ASSESSED SHALL BE PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI OR
ITS ASSIGNS IN MONTHLY INSTALLMENTS OF NOT EXCEEDING TWENTY -FOUR (24)
IN NUMBER, SAID PAYMENTS TO BE MADE AT THE CITY HALL IN THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISM NUECES COUNTY TEXAS, THE FIRST OF WHICH SHALL BE PAY-
ABLE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE COMPLETION OF SAID
-7-
IMPROVEMENTS AND THEIR ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ONE
INSTALLMENT SHALL BE PAYABLE EACH MONTH THEREAFTER UNTIL SAID ASSESSMENT
HAS BEEN PAID IN FULLS INCLUDING INTEREST THEREON AT THE RATE OF 6-12%
PER ANNUM FROM AND AFTER THE DATE OF SAID COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE
PAST DUE PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST TO BEAR INTEREST AT THE SAME RATE PER
ANNUM UNTIL PAID SO THAT UPON THE COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE BY SAID
CITY COUNCIL OF THE IMPROVEMENTS IN ANY UNIT OR PORTION OF STREET ABOVE
DEFINED, THE ASSESSMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SUCH COMPLETED
AND ACCEPTED UNIT SHALL BE AND BECOME DUE AND PAYABLE IN INSTALLMENTS AS
PROVIDED. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THE OWNER OR OWNERS OF ANY SUCH PROPERTY
SHALL HAVE THE PRIVILEGE OF PAYING ALL OR ANY OF SAID INSTALLMENTS TOGETHER
WITH INTEREST ACCRUED THEREON DOWN TO THE DATE OF PAYMENT; AND PROVIDED
FURTHER THAT THE OWNER OR OWNERS OF ANY SUCH PROPERTY MAY PAY THE TOTAL
OF SUCH ASSESSMENT WITHOUT INTEREST WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER THE
COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS. IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE
IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY INSTALLMENT OF PRINCIPAL OR INTERESTS PROMPTLY WHEN
DUE, THEN, AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, OR ITS ASSIGNS,
THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF SAID ASSESSMENT UPON WHICH DEFAULT IS MADE TOGETHER
WITH REASONABLE ATTORNEYS FEES AND ALL COSTS AND EXPENSES OF COLLECTION,
IF INCURRED SHALL BE AND BECOME IMMEDIATELY DUE AND PAYABLE.
SECTION 7. IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY OF
SAID SUMS HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST THE SAID PARCELS OF PROPERTY AND THE
REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, COLLECTION THEREOF SHALL BE EN-
FORCED, AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI OR ITS ASSIGNS, EITHER
BY SUIT IN ANY COURT HAVING JURISDICTION, OR BY SALE OF THE PROPERTY
ASSESSED AS NEARLY AS POSSIBLE IN THE MANNER AS MAY BE PROVIDED BY LAW IN
FORCE IN SAID CITY FOR THE COLLECTION OF AO VALOREM TAXES.
SECTION 8. FOR THE PURPOSE OF EVIDENCING SAID ASSESSMENTS, THE
LIENS SECURING SAME AND THE SEVERAL SUMS ASSESSED AGAINST THE SAID PARCELS
OF PROPERTY, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AND THE TIME
AND TERMS OF PAYMENT, AND AID IN THE ENFORCEMENT THEREOF ASSIGNABLE
CERTIFICATES SHALL BE ISSUED BY THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS TO
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI UPON THa COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SAID SIDE-
WALK 1UPROYEMENTB IN ANY UNIT OR PORTION OF STREET ABOVE DEFINED, WHICH
CERTIFICATES SHALL BC EXECUTED DY THE N %TOR IN THE HAVE OF THE CITY,
ATTESTED 13Y TOE CITY SECRETARY WITH THE CORPORATE SEAL, AND WHICH SHALL
DECLARE THE AMOUNTS OF SAID ASSE33MEDITS AND THE TIMES AND TERMS THEREOF,
THE RATC OF INTEREST THEREON, THE DATE OF THE COMPLETION AND THE ACCEPTANCE
OF THE IMiPROVEI4ENTS FOR WHICH THE CERTIFICATE IS ISSUCO; ANO SHALL CONTAIN
THE NAME OF THE APPARENT OWNER OR NJMERS A$ ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE, AND THE
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY ASSESSED BY LOT ANIJ CLOCK NUMBER OR FRONT FOOT
THEREOF, OR SUCH OTHER DESCRIPTIONS AS MAY OTHERWISE IDENTIFY THE SAME,
AND IF THE SAID PROPERTY SHALL DC OPINED BY AN- ESTATE OR FIRM, THEN TO SO
STATE THE FACT SHALL DE SUFFtCICNT, AND 00 ERROR OR MISTAKE IN DESCRIBING
ANY SUCH PROPERTY OR IN GIVING THE NAME OF ANY OWNER OR OWNERS, OR OTHER -
WISE] SHALL IN ANYI-IISE INVALIDATE OR IMPAIR THE ASSESSMIEtdT' LEVIED HEREBY
'00 THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED 111 EVIDENCE THEREOF.
THE SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL FURTHER PROVIDE SUBSTANTIALLY. THAT IF
DEFAULT SHALL SE MADE IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY INSTALLMENT OF PRINCIPAL OR
INTEREST WHEN DUE, THEN AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, OR ITS
ASSIGNS., OR THE HOLOER THERCOF, THE WHOLE OF SAID ASSESSMENT EVIDENCED TNERE-
DY SHALL AT ONCE BECOME DUE AND PAYABLE AND SMALL 13F COLLECTIBLE WITH
F.EASW ADL,E ATTORNEY'S FEES AND ALL EXPENSE$ AND COSTS OF COLLLCTION,- IF
INCURRED; AND SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL SET FORTH AND EVIDENCE THE PERSONAL
LIABILITY Of THE REA4 AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS OF SUCH PROPERTY, WHETHER
NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED THEREIN OR HOT, AND THE LIEN UPON SUCH PROPERTY]
AND THAT SAID LIEN IS FIRST AND PARAC40UNT THEREON, SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER LIENS,
TITLES AND CHARGES, EXCEPT FOR LAWFUL AD VALOREM TAXES, FROM AND AFTER THE
DATE SAID IMPROVEMENTS WERE ORDERED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, At$D SHALL PROVIDE
IN EFFECT, THAT IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MAOE Ili THE PAYMENT THEREOF, THE SAVE
MAY BE ENFORCCD, AT THE OPTION Of THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI OR ITS ASSIGNS,
EITHER BY THE SALE OF THE PROPERTY THEREIN DESCP.ICCO IN THE MANNER PROVIDED
FOR THE COLLECTION Of' AD VALOREM TAKES AS ABOVE RECITED, OR by SUIT IN ANY
COURT HAVING JURISDICTION.
.9-
SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL FURTHER Rum 1N EFFECT THAT ALL THE PRO -
CEEDIN3S WITH REFERENCE TO PARING SAID IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN REGULARLY
HAD IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW IN FORCE IN SAID CITY AND PROCEEDINGS OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY, AND THAT ALL PREREQUISITES TO THE FIXING
OF THE ASSESSMENT LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY AND THE PERSONAL LIABILITY
OF THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR 01a1NER5 THEREOF, EVIDENCED BY SUCH CERTIFI-
CATES, HAVE BEEN REGULARLY DONE AND PF_RFORma, WHICH HECITALS SHALL BE
EVIDENCE OF ALL THE NATTERS AND FACTS SO RECITED, AND NO FURTHER PROOF
THEREOF SHALL DE REQUIRED IN ANY COURT.
SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL FURTHER PROVIDE IN EFFECT THAT THE CITY
OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, SHALL EXERCISE ALL OF ITS LAWFUL POWERS, WHEN
REQUESTED SO TO DO BY THE HOLDER OF SAID CERTIFICATES, TO AID IN THE EN-
FORCEMENT AND COLLECTION THE090F, AND SAID CERTIFICATES MAY CONTAIN OTHER
AND FURTHER RECITALS PERTINENT AND APPROPRIATE THERETO. IT SHALL NOT DE
NECESSARY THAT SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL BE IN THE EXACT FORM AS AGOVE SET
FORTH, BUT THE SUBSTANCE AND EFFECT THEREOF SHALL SUFFICE.
SECTION 9. ALL SUCH ASSESSIIEHTS LEVIED ARE, AM SHALL FIE A PER-
SONAL LIABILITY AND CHARGE AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE REAL AND TRUE OV14ER OR
OWNERS OF SAID ABUTTING PROPERTIES, NOTWITHSTANDING SUCH OWNER OA OWNERS
NAY NOT Or NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED, AND ANY IRREGULARITY IN THE NAME OF
THE PROPERTY OWtIER, OR THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY PROPERTY OR THE AMOUNT OF ANY
ASSESSMENT, OR IN ANY OTHER RATTER OR THING SHALL NOT III ANYWISE INVALIDATE
OR IMPAIR ANY ASSE55MENT LEVIED HEREBY OR ANY CERTIFICATE ISSUED, AND ANY
SUCH MISTAKE, OR ERROR, INVALIDITY OR IRREGULAIIITY, WHQTHER IN SUCH ASSESS-
MENT OR IN THE CERTIFICATES ISSUED IN EVIDENCE THEREOF, 14AY FIE, BUT 15 NOT
REQUIRED TO DE, 114 ORDER TO BE ENFORCEABLE, CORRECTED AT ANY T114C BY THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS.
THE TOTAL AMOUNTS ASSESSED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF
PROPERTY ABUTTING UPM THE UNITS OR PORTIONS OF STREETS ABOVE SET OUT$, AND
THE REAL AHD TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, ARE THE SAM, OR LESS THAN,
THE ESTIfA TES OF SAID ASSESSMENTS PREPARED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, AP40 ARE IN ACCOPOANCE WITH
THE PROCEEDIMS OF SAID CITY RELATIVE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS AN43 ASa°E55/IEIITS
Q
• •
THEREFOR, AND WITH THE TERMS, POWERS AND PROVISIONS OF SAID CHAPTER 106
OF THE ACTS OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE 40TH LEGISLATURE, KNOWN
AS ARTICLE 11058, VERNON'S TEXAS CIVIL STATUTES, AS AMENDED, AND ARTICLE
IX, SECTION 6 OF THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY, UNDER WHICH TERMS, PROVISIONS
AND POWERS OF SAID ACTS SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS WERE HAD AND
MADE BY SAID CITY COUNCIL.
SECTION 10. THE IMPORTANCE TO THE PUBLIC OF DETERMINING THE
ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PROPERTY OWNERS AND THEREBY ENABLING CONSTRUCTION TO
PROCEED AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE CREATES A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND AN IMPERATIVE
PUBLIC NECESSITY REQUIRING THE SUSPENSION OF THE CHARTER RULE THAT NO ORDI-
NANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE OF ITS INTRODUCTION
AND THAT SUCH ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE SEVERAL MEET-
INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THE MAYOR, HAVING DECLARED THAT SUCH EMERGENCY
AND NECESSITY EXIST, HAVING REQUESTED THAT SUCH CHARTER RULE BE SUSPENDED
AND THAT THIS ORDINANCE BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE OF ITS INTRODUCTION
AND TAKE EFFECT AND BE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT FROM AND AFTER ITS PASSAGE,
IT IS ACCORDINGLY SO ORDAINED, THIS THE DAY OF MARCH, 1968.
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY MA OR
THE CITY OF US CHRISTI, TEXAS
APPROVED:
O DAY OF MARCH, 1968:
CITY A1`TORNtY
CORPUS CHRISTI TEXAS f� (�
,!,. DAY OF. �i 1!9lp it
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE OF THE FOREGOING
ORDINANCE, A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND IMPERATIVE NECESSITY EXIST FOR THE SUSPEN-
SION OF THE CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT THAT NO ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL
BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCEDO AND THAT SUCH ORDINANCE OR
RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCILS I, THEREFORE
REQUEST THAT YOU SUSPEND SAID CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT AND PASS THIS ORDI-
NANCE FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED, OR AT THE PRESENT MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL.
RESPECTFULLY,
G
d
MAYOR ClJ,, c„
THE CITY F RP CHRISTI] TEXAS
THE CHARTER RULE WAS SUSPENDED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
JACK R. BLACKMON
RONNIE SIZEMORE Q••n
V. A. "DICK" BRADLEY, JR. C •��
d
P. JIMENEZ, JR., M.D.
GABE LOZANO, SR.
KEN MCDANIEL
W. J. "WRANGLER" ROBERTS
THE ABOVE ORDINANCE WAS PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
JACK R. BLACKMON
RONNIE SIZEMORE Lpl.L2�
V. A. "DICK" BRADLEY, JR. aid-
P. JIMENEZ, JR., M.D.
GABE LOZANO, SR. OGUo
KEN MCDANIEL
W. J. "WRANGLER" ROBERTS