HomeMy WebLinkAbout08823 ORD - 04/03/1968BJb1 :4/2/68 .
A
5 ?
a
AN ORDINANCE
CLOSING THE HEARING GIVEN TO THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS
OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON TARLETON STREET, FROM PORT
AVENUE TO GREENWOOD DRIVE; COLEMAN STPEET FROM 19TH
STREET TO BLUNTZER STREET; AND MITCHELL STREET FROM
OCEAN DRIVE TO SANTA FE, AS TO SPECIAL BENEFITS TO
ACCRUE TO SAID PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS
THEREOF BY VIRTUE OF THE IMPROVEMENT OF SAID STREETS
WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, AND AS TO ANY ERRORS, AND
INVALIDITIES OR IRREGULARITIES IN ANY OF THE PROCEED-
INGS OR CONTRACT THEREOF, OVERRULING AND DENYING ALL
PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS OFFERED, EXCEPT THE CHANGES
REFLECTED HEREIN; FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE PRO-
PERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS
DEFINED, WILL BE SPECIALLY BENEFITTED AND ENHANCED IN
VALUE IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT OF THE COST OF SAID IM-
PROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO BE AND AS HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST
SAID PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON A PORTION OF TARLETON STREET,
COLEMAN STREET AND MITCHELL STREET, WITHIN THE LIMITS
DEFINED, AND LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT FOR THE PAYMENT OF A
PORTION OF THE COST OF IMPROVEMENTS ON SAID STREETS,WITH-
IN SAID LIMITS, FIXING A CHARGE AND LIEN AGAINST THE PRO-
PERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREETS AND THE REAL AND TRUE
OWNERS THEREOF, PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE
CERTIFI'irATES UPON THE COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SAID
WORK, lIC-IE MANNER AND TIME OF PAYMENT AND PROVIDING THE
MANNER AND METHOD OF COLLECTION OF SAID ASSESSMENTS AND
CERTIFICATES; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, THE CITY COUNCIL OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, BY DULY ENACTED
ORDINANCE PASSED AND APPROVED ON FEBRUARY 21, 1968, DETERMINED THE NECESSITY
FOR, AND ORDERED THE IMPROVEMENT OF A PORTION OF TARLETON STREET, FROM PORT
AVENUE TO GREENWOOD DRIVE; COLEMAN STREET, FROM 19TH STREET TO BLUNTZER
STREET; AND MITCHELL STREET, FROM OCEAN DRIVE TO SANTA FE, WITHIN THE LIMITS
HEREINAFTER DEFINED, IN THE I4ANNER AND ACCORDING TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICA-
TIONS HERETOFORE APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL BY ORDINANCE DATED
FEBRUARY 21, 1968, SAID PORTION OF SAID STREETS TO BE IMPROVED BEING AS FOLLOWS,
TO —WIT:
1. TARLETON STREET, FROM PORT AVENUE TO GREENWOOD DRIVE;
2. COLEMAN STREET, FROM 19TH STREET TO BLUNTZER STREET; AND
3. MITCHELL STREET FROM OCEAN DRIVE TO SANTA FE;
A DULY EXECUTED NOTICE OF SAID ORDINANCE HAVING BEEN FILED IN THE NAME OF
SAID CITY WITH THE COUNTY CLERIC OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS; AND
WHEREAS, SAID CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS,
AFTER HAVING ADVERTISED FOR AND RECEIVED BIDS ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID
IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE LENGTH OF TIME AND IN THE MANNER AND FORM AS REQUIRED
BY THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY AND THE LAWS OF THE STATE CIF TEXAS, AND AFTER
823
HAVING DULY AND REGULARLY MADE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR SUCH
PURPOSE TO COVER THE ESTIMATED COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID CITY, ALL
AS PROVIDED BY THE CORPUS CHRISTI.CITY CHARTER AND BY LAWS AND
WHEREAS, THE SAID CITY COUNCIL CAUSED THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
TO PREPARE AND FILE ESTIMATES OF THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND ESTIMATES
OF THE AMOUNT PER FRONT FOOT PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE PROPERTY
ABUTTING UPON A PORTION OF TARLETON STREET, COLEMAN STREET AND MITCHELL
STREET, WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFINED, TO BE IMPROVED, AND THE REAL AND
TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND SAID DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS HAS HERETOFORE FILED
SAID ESTIMATES AND A STATEMENT OF OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO WITH SAID
CITY COUNCIL, AND SAME HAS BEEN RECEIVED, EXAMINED AND APPROVED BY SAID CITY
COUNCILS AND
WHEREAS, SAI.D CITY COUNCIL, BY DULY ENACTED ORDINANCE DATED
FEBRUARY 21, ig68;,,DID DETERMINE THE NECESSITY OF LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT FOR
THAT PORTION OF THE COST OF CONSTRUCTING SAID IMPROVEMENTS ON THE ABOVE
NAMED STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFINED, TO BE PAID BY THE ABUTTING
PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND DID ORDER AND SET A HEAR-
ING TO BE HELD AT 3:00 O'CLOCK P.M. ON MARCH 20, 1968, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER
OF THE CITY HALL OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, FOR THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF
THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREET WITHIN THE LIMITS ABOVE DEFINED, AND
FOR ALL OTHERS OWNING OR CLAIMING ANY INTEREST IN, OR OTHERWISE INTERESTED
IN SAID PROPERTY, OR ANY OF SAID MATTERS AS TO THE ASSESSMENTS AND AMOUNTS
TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PARCEL OF ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND
TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AND AS TO THE SPECIAL BENEFITS TO ACCRUE TO
SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY BY VIRTUE OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS, IF ANY, OR CONCERNING
ANY ERROR, INVALIDITY, IRREGULARITY OR DEFICIENCY IN ANY PROCEEDINGS, OR
CONTRACT, TO APPEAR AND BE HEARD IN PERSON OR BY COUNSEL AND OFFER EVIDENCE
IN REFERENCE TO SAID MATTERS; AND SAID CITY COUNCIL DID BY SAID ORDINANCE
ORDER AND DIRECT THE CITY SECRETARY TO GIVE NOTICE OF SAID HEARING TO THE
REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREETS, WITHIN THE
LIMITS DEFINED, BY PUBLICATION IN THE CORPUS CHRISTI TIMES, THE OFFICIAL
_2_
9
NEWSPAPER OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, A NEWSPAPER PUBLISHED IN THE CITY
OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, OF GENERAL CIRCULATION, SAID NOTICE TO BE PUBLISHED
IN SAID NEWSPAPER AT LEAST THREE TIMES PRIOR TO THE DATE OF SAID HEARING,
THE FIRST PUBLICATION OF WHICH TO BE AT LEAST TEN (10) DAYS PRIOR THERETO,
ALL AS PROVIDED FOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SAID CITY
11 CHARTER
AND OF CHAPTER 106 OF THE ACTS OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE 40TH
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, KNOWN AND SHOWN AS ARTICLE 11056, VERNON'S
ANNOTATED CIVIL STATUTES OF TEXAS; AND
WHEREAS, SAID CITY COUNCIL DID FURTHER ORDER AND DIRECT SAID CITY
SECRETARY, IN ADDITION TO SAID PUBLISHED NOTICE AS AFORESAID, WHICH WAS
PROVIDED TO BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT IN ITSELF, TO KEEP ON FILE A COPY OF
SAID DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS' REPORT, AND INCLUDE THEREIN THE LIST OF NAMES
OF THE APPARENT OWNERS, AND THE DESCRIPTIONS OF SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY AS
SET OUT IN SAID D(,I RECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS' REPORTS PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT
THE SAID LIST OF APPARENT OWNERS AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS SO INCLUDED IN
SAID NOTICE, SHALL MERELY BE CUMULATIVE OF AND IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIRE-
MENTS OF SAID NOTICE AS PROVIDED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, AND THE
CHARTER OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, AND SHALL NOT IN ANY MANNER BE
CONCLUSIVE OF THE REAL AND TRUE 014NERS OR OF THE CORRECT DESCRIPTIONS OF
SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY NOR LIMIT SAID NOTICE TO THE PROPERTIES DESCRIBED OR
TO SUCH APPARENT OWNERS NAMED THEREIN, BUT SAID NOTICE SHALL NEVERTHELESS BE
DIRECTED TO THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY, WHETHER NAMED
OR CORRECTLY NAMED THEREIN OR NOT, AND TO ALL OTHERS CLAIMING, OWNING OR
INTERESTED IN ANY MANNER IN ANY OF SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY ON SAID STREETS
WITHIN THE LIMITS ABOVE DEFINED; AND
WHEREAS, SAID NOTICE AS ORDERED AND DIRECTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL
AND AS REQUIRED BY SAID ACTS AND CHARTER OF SAID CITY AS ABOVE IDENTIFIED,
WAS DULY GIVEN PUBLICATION OF SAME IN THE CORPUS CHRISTI TIMES, A NEWSPAPER
PUBLISHED IN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, ON MARCH 6, 1968, MARCH 121
1968 AND MARCH 18, 1968, SAID NOTICE SO PUBLISHED BEING DIRECTED TO THE
OWNERS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE STREETS HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED; AND
-3-
i •
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
March 20, 1968
Page 11
Manager Townsend stated he had been in conference with Mr ostutler for the
past few days in an atte to complete the sale, but so for failed to come with a satis-
factory figure.
Mayor Pro Tom Sizemore ised Mr. Hostutler ity Manager Townsend has the
authority to negot' a sale; that he should confer furt her with him an t the Council will
race' a report.
Following a brief recess, Mayor Blackmon assumed the Chair and reconvened the meet-
ing, directed that it be noted that the Council was all present, and announced the Council
would now hold the public hearing scheduled for 3:00 p.m. on assessments for the proposed
street improvements on Tarleton Street, from Port Avenue to Greenwood Drive; Coleman Street,
from 19th Street to Bluntzer; and Mitchell Street, from Santa Fe to Ocean Drive; explained that
each member of the Council had been furnished with a preliminary assessment roll; and that
Assistant City Attorney Tom McDowell would conduct the public hearing.
City Manager Townsend explained that upon the recommendation of the Staff, the Horne
Road portion of the improvements had been deleted because of inability to acquire necessary
right -of -way, and stated that the residents of this street have been notified by letter.
Mr. McDowell explained the purpose of the public hearing and stated that the Staff
would offer testimony from the City Engineer and evaluation testimony from a real estate ap-
praiser to substantiate the assessments which appear on the Preliminary Assessment Roll, and
that the hearing was to form a basis on which the Council, acting as a legislative body, would
determine or establish the assessments on the abutting properties.
Mr. James K. Lontos, City Engineer, presented the plans for the proposed street im-
provements and Preliminary Assessment Roll; tc :tifica as to the nature, extent and specifications;
stated the total contract price of the improvements is in the amount of $117,807.50; the total
assessments to abutting property owners is $67,17'..58; and that the total amount of the City's
portion is $50,629.92; explained the manner in which such pro rata share was computed, and
stated that the assessments were based on the low bid submitted by Asphalt Paving Company.
Mr. Lantos described the type of improvements in relation to each street to be improved, and
Minutes, Regular Council Meeting
March 20, 1968
Page 12
pointed out that the improvements were initiated by voluntary request of the residents, and
that the majority have signed petitions requesting the improvements.
Mayor Blackmon gave those in the audience an opportunity to question Mr. Lantos as
to the specifications and engineering aspects of the project in relation to their individual
properties.
Mr. Sam Amspoker, 218 Mitchell, filed with the Council a petition containing the signa-
tures of 12 residents on Mitchell Street, requesting that the sidewalks be installed to abut the
curb which would eliminate the intervening planting area, and that the curb to be installed be
what is generally called an "L" design rather than the roll type curb which would permit cars to
park partly on the sidewalk or planting area.
Mayor Blackmon received the petition and stated the request would be given further con-
sideration.
Mr. Allen Lewis, 233 Mitchell, appeared and inquired as to what additional cost to the
property owner If Mitchell Street were made a wider street than the proposed 30 feet. The
question arose as to the legality of increasing the assessments without further notice to the
property owners, and it was determined that the assessments can be increased without calling
another hearing.
Dr. Paul M. Gray, 215 Mitchell, stated it is not the desire of the residents that
Mitchell Street become a thoroughfare; stated that it was the thought of most of the residents
that the street would be a safer street if it were widened, but stated that he doubted if the
owners would agree to an increase in the assessment rates.
Mayor Blackmon stated that he did not feel it wise, though legal, to raise the assess-
ment rates after property owners have been notified otherwise.
Mr. McDowell stated that if evaluation testimony is such that maximum rates would be
of special benefit, based on the higher rate, then another public hearing could possibly be
avoided.
Mayor Blackmon announce& he Assessment hearing would be resumed.
Mr. McDowell celled Mr. John A. Erickson to testify as a real estate
appraiser. Mr. Erickson testified as to his background and experience which he felt
qualified him as an appraiser for all types of properties in this City, and testi-
fied that he is generally familiar with the subject properties; that he had personally
viewed and understood the extent and specifications of the proposed improvements;
that he had personally viewed within the past week the preliminary assessment roll
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
March 20, 1968
Page 14
and each of the properties to be assessed; and that in his opinion each of the
properties so assessed would be enhanced in value at least to the extent of the
proposed assessments, with the exception of the following: Coleman Street, listed
on the assessment roll as Items 1 through 61, should be reduced 25 percent of the
80 percent assessed, on the basis that the neighborhood is primarily occupied by
senior residents, the homes are of sub - marginal rental type, and that the size and
shape of lots are also sub - marginal; that the driveways are presently of shell
construction, and that it is his opinion that the sidewalks and driveways would
enhance the value of properties on Coleman Street, but that the paving and curb and
gutters would be of no benefit. Mr. Erickson stated that Tarleton Street is similar
to Coleman except that it has been described as a "collector" street, and that
in his opinion, the assessments for sidewalks and driveways will be an enhancement,
but that the construction of curbs and gutters will not benefit these residents,
and that there should be a 50 percent reduction of the 80 percent assessed, based on
the fact that Tarleton Street is classified as a "collector" street.
Mr. Lontos asked Mr. Erickson whether or not the reduction as stated above
includes curb and gutters or is it for the pavement only, and Mr. Erickson stated
that the pavement only should be reduced in accordance with the percentages stated
above. Mr. Erickson stated that the homes on Mitchell Street are in thE: $30,000
price range; stated that the street is in need of repair, is non - conforming in design,
and that in his opinion, each of the properties so assessed on Mitchell Street would
be enhanced in value at least to the extentof the proposed assessments.
Mayor Blackmon asked Mr. Erickson if he were aware that the proposed im-
provements on Coleman, Mitchell and Tarleton Streets, were initiated by petitions
from the residents expressing their desire and willingness to accept the improvements
and the cost, to which Mr. Erickson stated he was aware.
Mayor Blackmon gave property owners in the audience an opportunity at
this time to question Mr. Erickson with regard to property valuations in relation
to the assessments on the individual properties.
Mr. Andres Elizando, Item #99, stated her property is a corner lot at the
intersection of Tarleton and McArthur Street and faces on McArthur Street. She
stated she was opposed to the amount of the assessments since her home does not
face on the street proposed to be improved, and that she feels she will not be
r •
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
March 20, 1968
Page 15
benefitted by sidewalks on Tarleton Street.
Mr. Lontos explained that Mrs. Elizando's property legally faces on
Tarleton Street, and that it is being assessed accordingly.
Mr. Victor Wilmot, Item #31, appeared and asked that his address be
corrected on the assessment roll to show that he lives at 2621 Coleman Street in-
stead of Bluntzer. He stated he has no objection to the proposed improvements or
assessments.
Mr. McDowell asked Mr. Erickson the question: "save putting in the five -
foot sidewalks, would this change his opinion about the enhancement of value of
properties abutting Mitchell Street," and Mr. Erickson answered it would not change
his opinion.
City Manager Townsend stated it would be his recommendation that Mitchell
Street not be widened beyond the proposed 31 feet, on the basis that the additional
width would increase the overall contract price of the improvements.
No one else appeared to be heard in connection with the proposed street
improvements.
Motion by Sizemore, seconded by Roberts and passed, that the hearing be
closed
Motion by Bradley, seconded by Roberts and passed, that the matter of.
assessments on Tarleton, Coleman and Mitchell Streets, be tabled for further con-
sideration.
There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting
was adjourned.
THERE BEING NO FURTHER TESTIMONY OFFERED OR ANY FURTHER PARTIES
APPEARING TO BE HEARD, UPON PROPER MOTION, DULY SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY
CARRIED, THE SAID HEARING WAS DECLARED CLOSED; AND
WHEREAS, NO FURTHER PARTIES APPEARING AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY
BEING OFFERED AS TO THE SPECIAL BENEFITS IN RELATION TO THE ENHANCED VALUE
OF SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY AS COMPARED TO COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS OF SAID
PORTION OF SAID STREETS PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST SAID PROPERTY, OR
AS TO ANY ERRORS, INVALIDITIES OR IRREGULARITIES, IN THE PROCEEDINGS OR
CONTRACT HERETOFORE HAD IN REFERENCE TO THE PORTIONS OF SAID STREETS TO
BE IMPROVED AND
WHEREAS, SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS HEARD EVIDENCE AS TO THE SPECIAL
BENEFITS AND ENHANCED VALUE TO ACCRUE TO SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY, AND THE
REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AS COMPARED WITH THE COST OF 14AKING
SAID IMPROVEMENT,, ON SAID STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS ABOVE DEFINED, AND
HAS HEARD ALL PARTIES APPEARING AND OFFERING'TESTIMONY, TOGETHER WITH ALL
PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS RELATIVE TO SUCH MATTERS AND AS TO ANY ERRORS,
INVALIDITIES OR IRREGULARITIES IN ANY OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND CONTRACT FOR
SAID IMPROVEMENTS, AND HAS GIVEN A FULL AND FAIR HEARING TO ALL PARTIES
MAKING OR DESIRING TO MAKE ANY SUCH PROTEST, OBJECTION OR OFFER TESTIMONY
AND HAS FULLY EXAMINED AND CONSIDERED ALL EVIDENCE, MATTERS, OBJECTIONS
AND PROTESTS OFFERED AND BASED UPON SAID EVIDENCE, TESTIMONY AND STATEMENTS,
SAID CITY COUNCIL FINDS THAT EACH AND EVERY PARCEL OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON
THE PORTION OF TARLETON STREET, COLEMAN STREET AND MITCHELL STREET, WITHIN
THE LIMITS TO BE IMPROVED, AS HEREIN DEFINED, WILL BE ENHANCED IN VALUE AND
SPECIALLY BENEFITTED -BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS UPON THE SAID
STREETS UPON WHICH SAID PROPERTY ABUTS, IN AN AMOUNT IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT
OF THE COST SAID IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO BE, AND AS HEREINBELOW ASSESSED
AGAINST EACH AND EVERY SAID PARCEL OF ABUTTING PROPERTY, AND THE REAL AND
TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, SAID CITY COUNCIL DID CONSIDER AND CORRECT ALL ERRORS,
INVALIDITIES OR DEFICIENCIES CALLED TO ITS ATTENTION AND DID FIND THAT ALL
PROCEEDINGS AND CONTRACTS WERE PROPER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHARTER OF
-5-
SAID CITY AND THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, UNDER WHICH THOSE PROCEEDINGS
WERE BEING HAD, AND THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID CITY COUNCIL HERETOFORE HAD WITH
REFERENCE TO SUCH IMPROVEMENTS, AND IN ALL RESPECTS TO BE VALID AND REGULAR;
AND SAID CITY COUNCIL DID FURTHER FIND UPON SAID EVIDENCE THAT THE ASSESSMENTS
HEREINBELOW MADE AND THE CHARGES HEREBY DECLARED AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY
ON SAID PORTION OF SAID TARLETON STREET, COLEMAN STREET AND MITCHELL STREET,
WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, ARE JUST
AND EQUITABLE AND DID ADOPT THE RULE OF APPORTIONMENT SET OUT BELOW AND THE
DIVISION OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN SAID ABUTTING PROPERTIES,
AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AS JUST AND EQUITABLE, AND AS
PRODUCING SUBSTANTIAL EQUALITY CONSIDERING THE BENEFITS TO BE RECEIVED AND
THE BURDENS IMPOSED THEREBY, AND THAT ALL OBJECTIONS AND PROTESTS SHOULD BE
OVERRULED AND DENIED:
NOW, THOEFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. THAT THERE BEING NO FURTHER PROTEST OR TESTIMONY FOR
OR AGAINST SAID IMPROVEMENTS, SAID HEARING GRANTED TO THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS
OF ABUTTING PROPERTY ON SAID STREET, WITHIN THE LIMITS ABOVE DEFINED, AND TO
ALL PERSONS, FIRMS, CORPORATIONS AND ESTATES, OWNING OR CLAIMING SAME OR ANY
INTEREST THEREIN, BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY CLOSED AND ALL PROTESTS AND
OBJECTIONS, WHETHER SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED OR NOT, SHALL BE, AND THE SAME
ARE HEREBY OVERRULED AND DENIED.
SECTION 2. THAT SAID CITY COUNCIL HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES
UPON THE EVIDENCE HEARD IN REFERENCE TO EACH AND EVERY PARCELS OF PROPERTY
ABUTTING UPON TARLETON STREET, COLEMAN STREET AND MITCHELL STREET, WITHIN
THE LIMITS DEFINED, THAT THE SPECIAL BENEFITS IN THE ENHANCED VALUE TO ACCRUE
TO SAID PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, BY VIRTUE
OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID PORTION OF SAID STREET UPON
WHICH SAID PROPERTY ABUTS, WILL BE IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT OF THE COST OF
IMPROVEMENTS AS PROPOSED TO BE, AND AS HEREIN, ASSESSED AGAINST SAID ABUTTING
PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND FINDS THAT THE APPORTIONMENT
OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS, AND ALL ASSESSMENTS HEREINBELOW MADE ARE
-6-
JUST AND EQUITABLE AND PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL EQUALITY CONSIDERING THE BENEFITS
RECEIVED AND THE BURDENS IMPOSED THEREBY, AND ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
LAWS, OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, AND THE CHARTER PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI, TEXAS AND THAT THE PROCEEDINGS AND CONTRACT HERETOFORE HAD WITH
REFERENCE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ALL RESPECTS REGULARS PROPER AND VALID,
AND THAT ALL PREREQUISITES TO THE FIXING OF THE ASSESSMENT LIENS AGAINST SAID
ABUTTING PROPERTIES AS HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED AND THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF
THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF WHETHER NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED
HEREIN OR NOT, HAVE BEEN IN ALL THINGS REGULARLY HAD AND PERFORMED IN COMPLI-
ANCE WITH THE LAW, CHARTER PROVISIONS AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE SAID CITY COUNCIL.
SECTION' 3. THAT IN PURSUANCE OF SAID ORDIIIANCEj DULY ENACTED
BY SAID CITY COUelCILj AUTHORIZING AND ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS OF THE
ABOVE DESCRIDED STREETS WITHIN THE LIMITS OEFIIIEOj AND IN PURSUANCE OF
SAID PROCEEDING7,6, HERETOFORE HAD AND ENACTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL IN
REFERENCE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND BY VIRTUE OF THE POWERS VESTED-IN SAID
CITY WITH RESPECT TO SAID STREET IMPP,OVENENTS BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
TEXAS AND THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO CHAPTER,
100' OF THE ACTS OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE LOTH LEGISLATURE OF
THE STATE OF TEXAS, KNOWN AND SHORN AS ARTICLE 11076 OF VERNON'S ANNOTATED
CIVIL STATUTES OF TEXAS AS AMENDED, THERE SHALL BED AND IS HERZBY
LEVIEDj ASSESSED AND TAXED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY
ABUTTING UPON SAID PORTION OF SAID STREET,. AND AGAINST THE PEAL AHD
TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, WHETHER SUCH REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS BE NAMED
OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN OR HOTj THE SEVERAL SUMS OF MONEY HEREIN9ELOW
MENTIONED AIID ITEMIZED OPPOSITE THE DESCRIPTION OF THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS
OF SAID PROPERTYj THE NUMBER OF FRONT FEET OF EACH AND THE SEVERAL A14OUNTS
ASSESSED AGAINST SAME AND THE PEAL AND TRUE OWNER. OR OWNERS THEREOF AND
NAMES OF THE APPARENT OWNERS THEREOF ALL AS CORPECTEO AND ADJUSTED BY
SAID CITY COUNCILS BEING AS FOLLOWS, TO —%,,'9T:
_7_
TARLETON, COLMIAN AND MITCHELL STREET IM1'ROVEiMTS
This project, number 220- 67 -99, includes the improvements to the follow-
ing streets:
1. Tarleton Street, from Port Avenue to Greenwood Drive
This section shall be constructed by excavation to a width
and depth to permit the construction of a 6" standard curb and
gutter section, 6" subgrade, 10" caliche base, prime coat and
2 type D hot -mix asphaltic concrete surface to a width of 44'
face to face of curb, and ,a 5' wide sidewalk, 4' thick tied to
curb.
2. Coleman Street, from 19th Street to Bluntzer Street and
Mitchell Street, from Ocean Drive to Santa Fe
This section will be excavated to a vwidth and depth to per-
mit the construction of a 6" standard curb and gutter section,
a 6" subgrade, 8" compacted caliche base, prime coat and 1" hot -
mix asphalt surface to a width of 30' face to face of curb and 4'
wide sidewalks, 4" thick.
All streets improved shall have 6" thick reinforced concrete driveways,
according to the plans or as designated by the owners and all storm sewers
and appurtenances necessary to properly drain the streets.
All utilities shall be adjusted where required to properly facilitate the
street construction.
Assessment rates have been determined by using the unit prices taken from.
the low bid and applying these prices to the front footage of the abutting
Properties as follows:
Property zoned and used R -1 or R -2
1. Tarleton Street curb,gutter,pvmt.
* $3.98 p.l.f.
2. Coleman Street 11 " "
* $4.23 p.l.f.
3. Mitchell Street It ++ ++
$4.97 P.l.f.
Property zoned other than R -1 or R -2
1. Tarleton Street curb,gutter,pvmt.
$7.89 p.l.f.
2. Coleman Street " " ++
$4.97 p.l.f.
All Sidewalks
0.41 p.s.f.
All Driveways
0.85 p.s.f.
Total Contract Price $117,807.50 *
Total Assessments 61 277.47 *
Total City's Portion 5b,530-03 *
*Changes due to Council Action (3- 20 -68) as appraised by qualified appraiser
in his testimony at public hearing.
• .; Sheet 1
Tarleton, Coleman. Mitchell -Street Improvements
Asphalt Paving Company
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
"i-J IM
NO.
OIRM & PROPERTY DESCRIIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSEL
COLML41
STREET from
19th to Bluntzer
Beginning
at 19th
St. - South Side
1.
SHAMROCK OIL & GAS COMPANY
Lot 1, Block 7, Summit Addn.
25.00 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
2.97
74.25
Zoned other than R -1 or R -2
-0-
Sidewalk
-0-
-0-
Driveway
-0-
74.25
2.
SHAMROCK OIL & GAS COMPANY
Lot 2, Block 7, Summit Addn.
25.00 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
2.97
74.25
Zoned other than R -1 or R -2
=Oa
Sidewalk
-0-
-0-
Driveway
-0-
74.25
3.
ANTONIO V. AGUILAR
Lot 3, Block 7, Summit Addn.
25.00 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
4.97
124.25
Zoned other than R -1 or R -2
60.00 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
24.60
94.80 S.F.
Driveway z -20'
0.85
80.58
229.43
4.
PABLO MORALES
Lot 4, Block 7, Summit Addn.
25.00 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
4.97
124.25
Zoned other than R -1 or R -2
60.00 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
24.60
94.80 S.F.
Driveway z -20'
0.85
80.58
229.43
5.
ALBERTO GARZA
Lot 5, Block 7, Summit Addn.
25.00 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
4.97
124.25
Zoned other than R -1 or R -2
100.00 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
41.00
-0-
Driveway
0.85
-0-
165.25
6.
JAMES C. MARTIN
Lot 6, Block 7, Summit Addn.
25.00 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
4.23
105.75
Zoned & used R -1 or R -2
60.00 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
24.60
99.60 S.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
84.66
215.01
• .r Sheet
Tarleton, Coleman Mitchell Street Improvements
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned 8: Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Pate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
NO. �. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION
I�
ASSESSED OF
i ASSESSMENT
EULOGIO QUINTANILIA
Lot 7, Block 7, Summit Addn.
Zoned R -1 or R -2
GERONIMO RMNM
Lot 8, Block 7, Summit Addn.
Zoned R -1 or R -2
ANGELA ALVAREZ
Lot 92 Block 7, Summit Addn.
Zoned R -1 or R -2
GILREETO FLORES
Lot 10, Block 7, Summit Addn.
Zoned R -1 or R -2
VICTORIANO CANCHOLA
Lot 11, Block 7, Summit Addn.
Zoned R -1 or R -2
MARTIN CANCHOLA
Lots 12 & 13, Block 7
Summit Addn. Zoned R -1 or R -2
25.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.li
60.00 S.F. Sidewalk
99.60 S.F. Driveway 10'
25.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
60.00 S.F. Sidewalk
99.60 S.F. Driveway 10'
25.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
99.60 S.F. Driveway
60.00 S.F. Sidewalk
25.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
60.00 S.F. Sidewalk
99.60 S.F. Driveway 10'
25.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
60.00 S.F. Sidewalk
99.60 S.F. Driveway 10'
50.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
160.00 S.F. Sidewalk
99.60 S.F. Driveway 10'
TOTAL
AMOUNT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
4.23
105.75
0.41
24.6o
0.85
84.66
215.01
4.23
105.75
o.41
24.6o
o.85
84.66
215.01
4.23
105.75
0.85
84.66
o.41
24.60
215.01
4.23
105.75
o.41
24.6o
o.85
84.66
215.01
4.23
105.75
0.41
24.60
o.85
84.66
215.01
4.23
211.50
o.41
65.6o
0.85
84.66
361.76
• • � Sheet
Tarleton, Coleman. Mitchell Street Imnrovements
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. F. Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p,l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq• ft. $
ITryi � �
047NER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUA1 %TITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSEL
13.
MRS. A. De MONTE
Lot 14, Block 7, Summit Addn.
Zoned R -1 or R -2. *Credit for
existing improvements.
25.00 L.F.
* -0-
-0-
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway
4.23
105.75
-0-
-0-
105.75
14.
GUADALUPE PULADO
Lot 15, Block 7, Summit Addn.
Zoned R -1 or R -2. -Credit for
existing improvements.
25.00 L.F.
* -0-
99.60 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway
4.23
o.41
0.85
105.75
-0- _
84.66
1go.41
15.
TOMASA MALDONADO
Lots 16 & 17, Block 7
Summit Addn. Zoned R -1 or
R -2
50.00 L.F.
200.00 S.F.
-0-
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway
4.23
0.41
0.85
211.50
82.00
-0-
293.50
16.
SYLVESTRE ARMADILLO
Lot 18, Block 7, Summit Addn.
Zoned R -1 or R -2
25.00 L.F.
60.00 S.F.
99.60 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway 10'
4.23
o.41
0.85
105.75
24.60
84.66
215.01
17.
RAYMUNDO TREVINO
Lot 19, Block 7, Summit Addn.
Zoned R -1 or R -2
25.00 L.F.
60.00 S.F.
99.60 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway 10'
4.23
o.41
0.85
105.75
24.60
84.66
215.01
18.
JAMES C. MARTIN
Lots 20 -21, Block 7, Summit
Zoned R -1 or R -2
63.92 L.F.
209.68 S.F.
-0-
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway
4.23
0.41
o.85
270.38
85.97
-0-
356.35
21st. Street
Intersection
• _ ,i _ Sheet
•
41arleton. oleman_r. Improvements
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
).
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUNT
ASSES24ENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
MANUEL DOMINGUEZ
Lots 1,2,3, Block 8
Summit Addn. Zoned
86.50 L.F.
x-192.00 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
4.23
0.41
365.89
78.72
R -1 or R -2. *Credit
99.60 S.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
84.66
-
for existing improvements.
529.27
BARBARA GUEVARA
Lot 4, Block 8, Summit Addn.
Zoned R -1 or R -2
25.00 L.F.
60.00 S.F.
99.60 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway 10'
4.23
0.41
0.85
105.75
24.60
84.66
215.01
ESPIRION FLORES
Lots 5,6,7, Block 8, Summit Add.
Zoned R -1 or R -2
75.00 L.F.
180.00 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
4.23
0.41
317.25
73.80
289.20 S.F.
Driveways 1 -20'
0.85
1 -10'
o.85
245.82
636.87
REYNALDO MIRELES
All Lot 8.& E 15' Lot 9
40.00 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
4.23
169.20
Block 8, Summit Addition
120.00 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
49.20
Zoned R -1 or R -2
99.60 S.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
84.66
303.06
ROSA M. BRYAN
W 10' Lot 9 & all Lot 10 -11,
Block 8, Summit Addition
Zoned R -1 or R -2
76.50 L.F.
260.00 S.F.
-0-
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway
4.23
0.41
0.85
323.59
lo6.6o
-0-
430.19
22nd Street I
tersection
•
, ••
Sheet
�-
164.00
r
o.85
-0-
Tarleton, Coleman, Mitchell Street Improvements
330.48
635.64
4.23
211.50
i,o47.27
0.41
65:60
& Used R -1 or R -2, C.G.
& Pavement $
84.66
_Zoned
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or
R -2 p.l.f.$
-0-
_
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per
sq. ft.
$
o.41
Assessment Rate, Driveway per
sq. ft.
$
NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION I QUANTITY I DESCRIPTION
ASSESSED OF
ASSESSMENT
24.
25.
'r0
27.
Min
ME
GEORGE PHILLIPS
Lots 1,2,3,4, Block 9
Summit Addn. Zoned R -1
or R -2
ELVRIQUE RAMIREZ
Lots 5 -6, Block 9, Summit
Zoned R -1 or R -2
JEHOVAH'S WITNESS CHURCH
Lots 7 -8, Block 9, Summit
Zoned R -1 or R -2
MANUELA GARZA
Lots 9- 10 -11, Block 9
Summit Addn. Zoned R -1
or R -2
FRANCISCO CONTEREAS
Lots 1 thru 5, Block 10,
Summit Addn. Zoned R -1 or
R -2
ALONZO VALDEZ
Lot 6, Block 10,.Summit Addn.
Zoned R -1 or R -2
111.50 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
400.00 S.F. Sidewalk
-0- Driveway
50.00 L.F. Curb, gutter,pvmt.
160.00 S.F. Sidewalk
99.60 S.F. Driveway 10'
50.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
160.00 S.F. Sidewalk
99.60 S.F. Driveway 10'
91.50 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
320.00 S.F. Sidewalk
-0- Driveway
23rd Street I tersection
136.50 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
340.00 S.F. Sidewalk
388.80 S.F. Driveways 2 -10
1 -20
25.00 L.F.
100.00 S.F.
-o-
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway
TOTAL
AMOUNT
RATE AMOUNT ASSESSED
4.23
471.64
0.41
164.00
o.85
-0-
0.85
330.48
635.64
4.23
211.50
i,o47.27
0.41
65:60
0.85
84.66
o.85
-0-
361.76
4.23
211.50
146.75
o.41
65.6o
0.85
84.66
361.76
4.23
387.o4
o.41
131.20
0.85
-0-
518.24
4.23
577.39
o.41
139.4o
0.85
0.85
330.48
i,o47.27
4.23
105.75
0.41
41.00
o.85
-0-
146.75
NO. ' 04INER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION
i ASSESSED OF
ASSESSMENT
K
32.
33.
34.
JUANITA SALDANA
Lots 7 -8, Block 10, Summit
Zoned R -1 or R -2
VICTOR I. WILMOT
Lots 9,10,11, Block 10
Summit Addn. Zoned R -1
or R -2
DOMINGO C. GARZA
Lots 38,39,40,41,42, Block 6
Summit Addn. Zoned other tb
R -1 or R -2
S. M. COWLING
Lots 36 -37, Block 6
Summit Addn. Zoned R -1 or R
*Credit for existing imps.
GONZALES ALBORNORZ
Lots 34 -35, Block 6, Summit
Zoned R -1 or R -2
50.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
200.00 S.F. Sidewalk
-0- Driveway
80.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
280.00 S.F. Sidewalk
99.60 S.F. Driveway 10'
ai STREET 1ETERSECTION
,h Side - Coleman Street
STREET 1 t to Bluntzer
ig at 19th St. - North Side
124.60 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
418.40 S.F. Sidewalk
189.60 S.F. Driveway 20'
50.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
* -0- Sidewalk
99.60 S.F. Driveway 10'
50.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
160.00 S.F.1 Sidewalk
99.60 S.F.1 Driveway 10'
TOTAL
AMOUNT
RATE AMOUNT ASSESSEI
4.23
0.41
0.85
4.23
0.41
0.85
4.97
0.41
o.85
4.23
o.41
o.85
4.23
0.41
0.85
211.50
82.00
-0-
338.4o
114.8o
84.66
619.26
171.54
161.16
21.50
-0-
84.66
211.50
65.60
84.66
293.50
537.86
951.96
296.16
1 361.76
Sheet
*---
. �
Tarleton, Colfman _Mitchell Street Improvements
& Used R -1 or R -2, C.G.
& Pavement $
_Zoned
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or
R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per
sq. ft.
Assessment Rate, Driveway per
sq. ft.
$
NO. ' 04INER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION
i ASSESSED OF
ASSESSMENT
K
32.
33.
34.
JUANITA SALDANA
Lots 7 -8, Block 10, Summit
Zoned R -1 or R -2
VICTOR I. WILMOT
Lots 9,10,11, Block 10
Summit Addn. Zoned R -1
or R -2
DOMINGO C. GARZA
Lots 38,39,40,41,42, Block 6
Summit Addn. Zoned other tb
R -1 or R -2
S. M. COWLING
Lots 36 -37, Block 6
Summit Addn. Zoned R -1 or R
*Credit for existing imps.
GONZALES ALBORNORZ
Lots 34 -35, Block 6, Summit
Zoned R -1 or R -2
50.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
200.00 S.F. Sidewalk
-0- Driveway
80.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
280.00 S.F. Sidewalk
99.60 S.F. Driveway 10'
ai STREET 1ETERSECTION
,h Side - Coleman Street
STREET 1 t to Bluntzer
ig at 19th St. - North Side
124.60 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
418.40 S.F. Sidewalk
189.60 S.F. Driveway 20'
50.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
* -0- Sidewalk
99.60 S.F. Driveway 10'
50.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
160.00 S.F.1 Sidewalk
99.60 S.F.1 Driveway 10'
TOTAL
AMOUNT
RATE AMOUNT ASSESSEI
4.23
0.41
0.85
4.23
0.41
0.85
4.97
0.41
o.85
4.23
o.41
o.85
4.23
0.41
0.85
211.50
82.00
-0-
338.4o
114.8o
84.66
619.26
171.54
161.16
21.50
-0-
84.66
211.50
65.60
84.66
293.50
537.86
951.96
296.16
1 361.76
• . . Sheet 7
-"
Tarleton, Coleman, Mitchell Street Improvements
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Pate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
:iT:rlvf
NO.
! OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUNT
Ili
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
35.
A. R. BERNAL
Lot 33 & E 5' Lot 32, Block 6
30.00 L.E.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
4.23
126.90
Summit Addn. Zoned R -1 or
60.00 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
24.60
R -2
139.80 S.F.
Driveway 15' of
20'
o.85
118.83
270.33
36.
A. R. BERNAL
W 20' Lot 32, All Lot 33,
45.00 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
4.23
190.35
Block 6, Summit Addition
160.00 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
65.60
Zoned R -1 or R -2
49.80 E.F.
Driveway 5' of 20
0.85
42.33
298.28
37.
ESPIRION FLORES
Lot 30, Block 6, Summit Addn.
25.00 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
4.23
105.75
Zoned R -1 or R -2
60.00 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
24.60
99.60 S.F.
Driveway 1 -10'
0.85
84.66
215.01
38.
AMANDO G. GARZA
Lots 28,27,29, and 26, Block 6
100.00 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
4.23
423.00
Summit Addn. Zoned R -1 or
320.00 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
131.20
199.20 S.F.
Driveway 2 -10'
0.85
1,69.32
723.52
39•
CONRADO VERA
Lots 24 -25, Block 6, Summit
50.00 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
4.23
211.50
Zoned R -1 or R -2
160.00 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
65.60
99.60 S.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
84.66
361.76
4o.
GENARO FLORES
Lots 22 -23, Block 6, Summit
63.92 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
4.23
270.38
Zoned R -1 or R -2
209.68 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
85.97
-0-
Driveway
0.85
-0-
35 6.35
21st. Street
ntersection
u
Sheet �
Tarleton, Coleman, Mitchell Street Improvements
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f,$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
1i�i I
N0.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
41.
JUSTO PEREZ
Lots 21 -22, Block 5, Summit
Zoned R -1 or R -2
61,50 L.F.
200.00 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt,
Sidewalk
4.23
0.41
260.14
82.00
-O-
Driveway
0.85
-0-
342.14
42.
M. H. CABRERO
Lot 20, Block 5, Summit Addn.
Zoned R -1 or R -2
25.00 L.F.
100.00 S.F.
-0-
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway
4.23
0.41
0.85
105.75
41.00
-0-
146.75
43.
MARUELA T. De AGUIERRA
Lot 19, Block 5, Summit Addn.
Zoned R -1 or R -2
25.00 L.F.
60.00 S.F.
99.60 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway 10'
4.23
0.41
0.85
105.75
24.60
84.66
215.01
44.
TEDDGRA G. PENA
Lots 17 -18, Block 5, Summit
Zoned R -1 or R -2
50.00 L.F.
160.00 S.F.
99.60 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway 10'
4.23
0.41
0.85
211.50
65.60
84.66
361.76
45.
SOLIA LERMA
Lots 15 -16, Block 5, Summit
Zoned R -1 or R -2
50.00 L.F.
200.00 S.F.
-0-
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway
4.23
0.41
0.85
211.50
82.00
-0-
293.50
46.
MARIA SOSA
Lots 13 -14, Block 5, Summit
Zoned R -1 or R -2
50.00 L.F.
120.00 S.F.
189.60 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway 1 -20'
4.23
0.41
0.85
211.50
49.20
161.16
421.86
sheet 9--
Tarleton, Coleman. Mitchell Street Improvements _
_ Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zcned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
-CIUY
I
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSEI
47.
ARMADILLA SILVESTRE
Lot 12, Block 5, Summit
Zoned R -1 or R -2
41.50 L.F.
120.00 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
4.23
0.41
175.54
49.20
-0-
Driveway
0.85
-0-
224.7h
22nd Street I
tersection
48.
MARCOS G. GUITERREZ
Lot 22, Block 4, Summit Addn.
Zoned R -1 or R -2
36.50 L.F.
100.00 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
4.23
o.41
154.39
41.00
-0-
Driveway
0.85
-0-
195.39
49.
RAFAEL RAMIREZ
Lot 21, Block 4, Summit Addn.
25.00 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
4.23
105.75
Zoned R -1 or R -2
100.00 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
41.00
-0-
Driveway
0.85
-0-
146.75
50.
DISEDEREO F. RIOS
Lots 19 -20, Block 4, Summit
Zoned R -1 or R -2
50.00 L.F.
160.00 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
4.23
0.41
211.50
65.60
99.60 S.F.
Driveway 10'
o.85
84.66
361.76
51.
VICENTE C. CARRANZA
Lots 17 -18, Block 4, Summit
Zoned R -1 or R -2
50.00 L.F.
160.00 S.F.
99.60 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway 101
4.23
0.41
o.85
211.50
65.60
84.66
361.76
52.
F. C. CONTRERAS
Lot 16, Block 4, Summit Addn.
Zoned R -1 or R -2
25.00 L.F.
100.00 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
4.23
0.41
105.75
41.00
-0-
Driveway
0.85
-0-
146.75
Shee 10
Tarleton, Coleman. Mitchell Street Improvements
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.1.f.S
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft.
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
:ITEM
-
NO.
i OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSEI
53.
PAULINE C. LAUREL
Lot 15, Block 4, Summit Addn.
25.00 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
4.23
105.75
Zoned R -1 or R -2
100.00 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
41.00
-0-
Driveway
0.85
-o- ,
146.75
54..
F. C. coil ERAS
Lots 12 13,14, Block 4,
91.50 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
4.97
454.76
Summit Addition. Zoned
*240.00 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
98.40
other than R -1 or R -2
199.20 S.F.
Driveways 2 -10'
0.85
169.32
*Credit for existing imps.
722.48
23rd. Street
Intersection
55.
F. C. CONTRERAS
Lots 21,22, Block 3
61.50 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
4.23
260.14
Summit Addn. Zoned R -1 or
-0-
Sidewalk
0.41
-0-
R-2
-0-
Driveway
0.85
-0-
26o.14
56.
PEDRO GARCIA
Lots 19 -20, Block 3
50.00 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
4.23
211.50
Summit. Zoned R -1 or R -2
200.00 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
82.00
-0-
Driveway
0.85
-0-
293.50
57.
ESTANISLADO BARBERA
Lots 18, Block 3, Summit
Zoned R -1 or R -2
25.00 L.F.
100.00 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
4.23
0.41
105.75
41.00
-0-
Driveway
0.85
-0-
146.75
58.
JOSE A. RUIZ
Lot 17, Block 3, Summit
Zoned R -1 or R -2
25.00 L.F.
100.00 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
4.23
0.41
105.75
41.00
-0-
Driveway
0.85
-0-
146.75
o
Sheet
11
Tarleton, Coleman, Mitchell Street Improvements
NO
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G.
& Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or
R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per
sq. ft.
$
Assessment Rate, Driveway per
sq. ft.
$
NO
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
59•
ANNA MYNAR
Lots 15 -16, Block 3
Summit Addn. Zoned
50.00 L.F.
160.00 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
4.23
0.41
211.50
65.60
R -1 or R -2
99.60 S.F.
Driveway 10
0.85
84.66
361.76
60.
PABLO NUNEZ
Lots 13 -14, Block 3
Summit Addn. Zoned
50.00 L.F.
160.00 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
4.23
0.41
211.50
65.60
R -1 or R -2
99.60 S.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
84.66
361.76
61.
ALBERT ARIZMENDI
Lot 12, Block 3
Surmait Addn. Zoned
30.00 L.F.
120.00 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
4.23
0.41
126.90
49.20
R -1 or R -2
-0-
Driveway
0.85
-0-
176.10
BLUNTZER STRiET
INTERSECTION
nd North Side
- Coleman Street
End Col
man Street
•
Sheet jjj12
Terletgn, Coleman, Mitchell Street Improvements
7,oned & Used R -1 or R -21 C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
ITEM
NO.
` OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
TARLETON STREET,
from West R.
.W. line of Port
venue
To East
R.O.W. Line of
Greenwood Drive
Beginni
g at Port Avenue
- South Side
62.
BILLY R. PONCE
Lot 1, Block 7, San Diego #1
45.58 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
7.89
359.63
Zoned other than R -1 or R -2
92.90 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
38.09
202.20 S.F.
Driveway 27'
0.85
171.87
569.59
63.
HECTOR De PENA
Lot 2, Block 7, San Diego #1
Zoned other than R -1 or R -2
50.00 L.F.
200.00 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
7.89
0.41
394.50
82.00
83.20 S.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
70.72
547.22
64.
LUIS G. CHAVARRIA
Lots 3 -4, Block 7, San Diego
Zoned other than R -1 or R -2
100.00 L.F.
450.00 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
7.89
0.41
789.00
184.50
83.20 S.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
70.72
1,o44.22
65.
T17-ODOR C. CAPELO
Lot 5, Block 7, San Diego #1
50.00 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
7.89
394.50
Zoned other than R -1 or R -2
200.00 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
82.00
*Unit = 7.51 x 10 + 83.20
* -0-
Driveway
o.85
-0-
X78.30 S.F.
Driveway lo' of
61 0.85
-0-
476.50
66.
MANUEL S. GONZALES
Lot 6, Block 7, San Diego #1
Zoned R -1 or R -2
50.00 L.F.
136.00 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
3.98
0.41
199.00
55.76
Unit = 7.51 x 16
118.60 S.F.
Driveway 16' of
6' 0.85
100.81
355.57
67.
EUGENIO F. VILLARRFAL
Lot 7, Block 7, San Diego #1
Zoned R -1 or R -2
50.00 L.F.
160.00 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
3.98
0.41
199.00
65.60
83.20 S.F
Driveway 10'
0.85
70.72
335.32
0 . - Shee'JJV_
Tarpon Colman M; hg11 St�ee�Improvements
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p -l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
N0.
i OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIIPTION
QUA_yTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
.OF
AMOUi :'
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESS
68.
PEDRO H. CORTEZ
Lot 8, Block 7, San Diego #1
50.00 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
3.98
199.00
Zoned R -1 or R -2
*Credit 44' driveway
160.00 S.F.
-39.20 S.F.
Sidewalk
Driveway 10'
0.41
o.85
65.60
33.32
297.9
69.
EHNESTo GUTIERREZ
Lot 9, Block 7, San Diego #1
Zoned R -1 or R -2
50.00 L.F.
160.00 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
3.98
o.41 .
199.00
65.60
83.20 S.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
70.72
335.32
70.
DAVID BERLANGA
Lot 10, Block 7, San Diego #1
50.00 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
3.98
199.00
Zoned R -1 or R -2
152.00 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
62.32
97.20 S.F.
Driveway 12'
0.85
82.62
343.94
71.
DAVID BERLANGA
Lot 11, Block 7, San Diego #1
Zoned R -1 or R -2
50.00 L.F.
160.00 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
3.98
0.41
199.00
65.60
83.20 S.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
70.72
335.32
72.
PRO%EDIO BUSTAMENTE
Lot 12, Block 7, San Diego #1
67.00 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
3.98
266.66
Zoned R -1 or R -2
220.00 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
90.20
-0-
Driveway
0.85
-0-
356.86
SARITA S
T INTERSECTION
73.
FELICIANO HERNANDEZ
(67.11)
Lot 25, Block 1, San Diego #1
95.02 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
3.98
267.09
Zoned R -1 or R -2
380.08 S.F.
Sidewalk
o.41
90.38
58% assessed
(220.45)
357.47
• • Sheet 14 _
Tarleton, Coleman,, Mitchell Strce't Improvements
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY I DESCRIPTION
ASSESSED OF
ASSESSMENT
74.
75•
76.
77.
78.
79•
IRMA R. MARTINEZ
Lot 30, Block 1, Casa Blanca
Zoned R -1 or R -2
50% assessed
NERO BINOJOSA
Lot 22, Block 3, Casa Blanca
Zoned R -1 or R -2
LUSANO V. RAMOS
Lot 23, Block 3, Casa Blanca
Zoned R -1 or R -2
JOE C. SALINAS
Lot 24, Block 3, Casa Blanca
Zoned R -1 or R -2
BENITO C. MARTINEZ
Lot 25, Block 3, Casa Blanca
Zoned R -1 or R -2
GUADALUPE RAMOS
LOt 26, Block 3, Casa Blanca
Zoned R -1 or R -2
(58.99)
95.98 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
383.92 S.F. Sidewalk
(191.96)
83.20 S.F. Driveway 10'
McARTHUR S T INTERSECTION
59.20 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
152.80 S.F. Sidewalk
83.20 S.F. Driveway 10'
42.40 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
129.60 S.F. Sidewalk
76.60 S.F. Driveway z -20'
42.40 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
129.60 S.F. Sidewalk
76.60 S.F. Driveway 21-20'
42.40 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
129.60 S.F. Sidewalk
83.20 S.F. Driveway 10'
42.40 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.
129.60 S.F. Sidewalk
83.20 S.F. Driveway 10'
3.98 I 235.61
0.41 62.65
o.85 70.72
3.98
168.75
TOTAL
o.41
53.14
AMOUNT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
287.00
3.98
234.78
0.41
78.70
0.85
70.72'
384.20
3.98 I 235.61
0.41 62.65
o.85 70.72
3.98
168.75
o.41
53.14
o.85
65.11
287.00
3.98
168.75
0.41
53.14
o.85
65.11
287.00
3.98
168.75
o.41
53.14
0.85
70.72
292.61
3.98
168.75
o.41
53.14
o.85
70.7
292.61
' • • .. Sheet_ 15_
Tarleton, Cole ran ,Mitchell Street Improvements
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
Y � r��I
lI 1
N0.
,1 OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUNT
ASS�SSME'NT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
80.
E. G. HORNE & MANUEL ZMERANO
Lot 27, Block 3, Casa Blanca
Zoned R -1 or R -2
42.40 L.F.
129.60 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
3.98
0.41
168.75
53.14
83.20 S.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
70.72
292.61
Bl.
SOUTHERN NATL. LIFE INSURANCE
Lot 28 -29, Block 3, Casa Blanca
84.80 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
3.98
337.50
Zoned R -1 or R -2
299.20 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
122.67
83.20 S.F.
Driveway 10'
o.85
70.72
530.89
82.
JUAN VARGAS
Lot 30, Block 3, Casa Blanca
42.40 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
7.89
334.54
Zoned other than R -1 or R -2
129.60 S.F.
'Sidewalk
o.41
53.14
83.20 S.F.
Driveway 10'
o.85
70.72
458.40
83.
PAUL Cox
Lot 31, Block 3, Casa Blanca
42.40 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
3.98
168.75
Zoned R -1 or R -2
129.60 S.F.
Sidewalk
o.41
53.14
83.20 S.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
70.72
292.61
84.
NARCISCO VEGA
Lot 32, Block 3, Casa Blanca
Zoned R -1 or R -2
42.40 L.F.
129.60 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
3.98
0.41
168.75
53.14
83.20 S.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
70.72
292.61
85.
MARCELINO VEGA
Lot 33, Block 3, Casa Blanca
42.40 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
3.98
168.75
Zoned R -1 or R -2
129.60 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
53.14
83.20 S.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
70.72
292.61
•
'
Sheet
16
Tarleton, Coleman, Mitchell Street Improvements
NO
OYNLR & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUAgTITY
DESCRIPTION
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G.
& Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or
R -2 p.1-f-t
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per
sq. ft.
$
Assessment Rate, Driveway per
sq. ft.
$
NO
OYNLR & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUAgTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSEDI
86.
FELI% C. GARZA
Lot 34, Block 3, CasaBlanca
Zoned R -1 or R -2
42.40 L.F.
129.60 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
3.98
o.41
168.75
53.14
83.20 S.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
70.72.
292.61
87.
GONZALO V. NARANGO
Lot 35, Block 3, Casa Blanca
Zoned R -1 or R -2
42.40 L.F.
129.60 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
3.98
0.41
168.75
53.14
83.20 S.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
70.72
292.61
88.
FIRST NATIONAL LIFE INS. COMPAN
Lot 36, Block 3, CasaBlanca
Zoned R -1 or R -2
42.40 L.F.•Curb,gutter,pvmt.
129.60 S.F.
Sidewalk
3.98
0.41
168.75
53.14
83.20 S.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
70.72
282.61
89.
cIPRINo MARTINEZ
Lot 37, Block 3, Casa Blanca
Zoned R -1 or R -2
42.40 L.F.
129.60 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt,
Sidewalk
3.98
0.41
168.75
53.14
83.20 S.F.
Driveway 10'
o.85
70.72
292.61
90.
ARTURO P. PALACIOS
Lot 38, Block 3, Casa Blanca
Zoned R -1 or R -2
42.40 L.F.
129.60 S.F.
83.20 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway 10'
3.98
0.41
0.85
168.75
53.14
70.72
292.61
91,
CESAR JAIME
Lot 39, Block 3, Casa Blanca
Zoned R -1 or R -2
42.40 L.F.
129.60 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
3.98
0.41
168.75
53.14
83.20 S.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
70.72
292.61
• + . � Sheet
Tarleton— Coleman. Mitcheil Street Improvements
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C•G. & Pavement $
Zoned. & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.1-f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
NO I
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
92.
HERIBERTO CANO
Lot 40, Block 3, Casa Blanca
Zoned R -1 or R -2
42.40 L.F.
129.60 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
3.98
0.41
168.75
53.14
83.20 S.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
70.72
282.61
93•
GUADALUPE FLORES
Lot 41, Block 3, Casa Blanca
Zoned R -1 or R -2
42.40 L.F.
129.60 S.F.
83.20 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway 10'
3.98
0.41
0.85
168.75
53.14
70.72
i
282.61
Sheet 18
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p -l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
N0.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSFT
94.
SEVERA DOMINGUEZ
Lot 42, Block 3, Casa Blanca
59.7 L.F.
152.80 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
3.98
0.41
237.60
62.65
83.20 B.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
70.72.
370.97
Eisenhower Street
Intersection
59.5
95•
DEMETRCO REYES
96.o L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
3.98
236.81
Lot 16, Block 1, Casa Blanca
(192.0)
50% Assessed
384.0 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
78.72
-0-
Driveway
0.85
-0-
315.53
(48.0)
96.
GENRoSA vASQUEZ
96.0 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
7.89
378.72
Lot 15, Block 1, Casa Blanca
50% Assessed
(240.0)
480.0 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
98.4o
Zoned other than R -1 or R -2
-0-
0.85
-0-
477.12
Greenwood Drive
Intersection
End South Side
Tarleton Street
STREET, PORT
AVE. to GREEM
TARIETON
OOD DRIVE
Beginn
ng at Port Ave
orth Side
712.15 L.F.
3,385.75 S.F
h 258.20 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway 35'
7.89'
o.41
o.85
97•
ARNULFO GONZALES
5.592 Acres out of Paisley
Hoffman West z of East 2 of Nor
z of Tract K, Sec. G
5,618.86
1,388.16
219.47
7,226.49
Used other than R -1 or R -2
• _ � Sheet_
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
`Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p:l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
lEN1
NO
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
-`
(99.33)
98.
DARIO RIOS
96.01 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
3.98
395.33
Lot 1, Block 3, LaArboleda
384.04 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
144.86
92% Assessed
(353.32)
-0-
Driveway
0.85
-0-
540.19
cArthur Stre
t Intersection
90.60 L.F.
99.
ANDRES ELIZANDO
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
3.98
360.58
Lots 20, 21, Block 4
94.50% Assessed
(96.62)
362.40 S.F.
Sidewalk
o.41
140.44
(342.47)
-0-
Driveway
0.85
-0-
500.99
100.
JOHN J. LOPEZ, JR.
84.80 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
3.98
337.50
Lots 18, 19, Block 4
297.60 S.F.
Sidewalk
o.41
122.02
LaArboleda
-0-
0.85
-0-
*Credit for 72.8' driveway
459.52
101.
SIXTA SAN MIGUEL
42.40 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
3.98
168.75
Lot 16, Block 4, LaArboleda
129.60 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
53.14
83.20 S.F.
Driveway lo'
0.85
70.72
292.61
102.
PEDRO GARZA
42.40 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
3.98
168.75
Lot 15, Block 4, LaArbolda
129.60 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
53.14
76.60 S.F.
Driveway z -20'
o.85
65•11
287.00
•
Sheet
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.0
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Pate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
ITEM �
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
103.
GUADALUPE ROJAS
Lot 14, Block 4, LaArboleda
42.40 L.F.
128.60 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
sidewalk
3.98
o.41
168.75
53.14
76.60 S.F.
Driveway z -20'
0.85
65.11
287.00
loo.
JESSE GOMEZ
Lot 13, Block 4, LaArboleda
42.40 L.F.
*117.60 S.F.
rb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
3.98
0.41
168.75
48.22
'Credit for 12 S.F. sidewalk
83.20 S.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
70.72
287.68
105.
RODOLFO AMADOR -
Lot 12, Block 4, LaArboleda
42.40 L.F.
129.60 S.F.
b,gatter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
3.98
o.41
168.75
53.14
83.20 ,�.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
70.72
282.61
106.
JOE H. RODRIGUEZ
Lot 11, Block 41 IoArboleda
42.40 L.F.
169.60 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
3.98
0.41
168.75
69.54
-0-
Driveway 10'
0.$5
-o-
238.29
107.
SINTON SAVINGS & LOAN
Lot 10, Block 4, LaArboleda
42.40 L.F.
129.60 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pirmt.
Sidewalk
3.98
0.41
168.75
53.14
83.20 S.F.
Driveway 10'
o.85
70.72
282.61
108.
MARIA B. PEREZ
Lot 9, Block 4, LaArboleda
42.40 L.F.
129.60 S.F.
83.20 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway 10'
3.98
0.41
o.85
168.75
53.14
70.72
282.61
Sheet 21.
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
gUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
1
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUNT
1
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
109.
JOE H. RODRIGUEZ
42.40 L.F.
Carb,gutter,pvmt.
3.98
168.75
Lot 8, Block 4, LaArboleda
129.60 S.F.
Sidewalk
o.41
53.14
83.20 S.F.
Driveway 10'
0.85
70.72
-
292.61
110.
JUAN S. GONZALES
84.80 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
3.98
337.50
Lot 6 & 7, Block 4, LaArboleda
259.20 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
106.27
166.40 S.F.
Driveway 2 -10'
o.85
141.44
585.21
.111.
FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH &
UNITED CHRISTIAN MISSIONARY
228.80 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
3.98
910.62
Society, Lots 1 thru 5,
871.2 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
357.19
Block 4, LaArboleda
-0-
Driveway
o.85
-0-
1,267.81
112.
CONSUELO G. GUTIERREZ
96.0 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
3.98
302.48
Lot 1, Block 1, LaArboleda
(76)
50% Assessed
384.0 S.F.
Sidewalk
o.41
78.72
(192.0)
83.20 S.F.
Driveway
0.85
70.72
451.92
113.
FRANK R. TREVINO
(48.0)
Lot 29, Block 11 LaArboleda
96.00 L.F.
Curb,gu.tter,pvmt.
7.89
378.72
Zoned other than R -1 or R -2
305.00 S.F.
Sidewalk
o.41
62.53
50% Assessed
(152.5)
258.20 S.F.
Driveway 35'
0.85
219.47
660.72
Greenwood Dr
ve Intersection
End Nort
Side Tarleton
End Ta
leton Street
• Sheet 22
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned P. Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 P.l.f.8
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
11 5
I i
NO.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL .
ASSESSED
OF
AMOM -T
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
114.
ESTATE OF LORINE JONES LEWIS
22%?.21 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
4.97
1,104.38
Lot B, LaRue Place
,107.05 S.F.
Oidewalk
0.41
453.89
-0-
Driveway
0.85
-0-
1,558.27
115.
PAUL M. GRAY, M.D.
120.00 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
4.97
596.40
Lot C, LaRue Place
600.00 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
246.o0
-0-
Driveway
0.85
-0-
842.4o
116.
623.20 E.F.
Driveway only 40'
0.85
529.72
Two 20' Private Drives
40. L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
4.97
198.80
(11 Owners)
-0-
Sidewalk
0.41
-0-
728.52
117.
MAURINE CLYMORE
184.00 L.F.
Curb,gatter,pvmt.
4.97
914.48
820.00 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
336.20
304.30 S.F.
Driveway 20'
0.85
258.66
1,509.34
118.
ALLEN S. LEWIS
82.00 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
4.97
407.54
Lot J, LaRue Place
360.00 S.F.
164.30 S.F.
Sidewalk
Driveway 10'
0.41
0.85
147.60
139.66
694.8o
119.
CORNET-LC. BARNARD, M.D.
82.00 L.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
4.97
407.54
Lot K, IaRue Place
410.00 S.F.
Sidewalk
0.41
168.10
-0-
Driveway
0.85
-0-
575.64
•
Sheet 23
Zoned & Used R -1 cr R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
CTr�'I I
NO. !�
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION I
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSED',
120.
MON McNIEL
Lot I. LaRue Place
90.00 L.F.
450.00 S.F.
-0-
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway
4.97
0.41
0.85
447.30
184.50
-0-
631.80
121.
MITCHELL C. WOMMACK
Lot 1 -2, LaRue Place
90.00 L.F.
450.00 S.F.
-0-
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
4.97
0.41
0.85
447.30
184.50
-0-
631.8o
Santa Fe Stre
t Intersection
Ind
East Side Mitchell
Street
MITCHELL
STREET, OCEAN
DRIVE TO SANTA FE
STREET
Beginning at
Ocean Drive
Wesl
Side
201.83 L.F.
,109.15 S.F.
-0-
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway
122.
MARY DOUGHERTY CARR
Lot 1, Block 1, Cole Place
4.97
0.41
0.85
1,003.09
454.75
-0-
1,457.84
123•
J. G. SMYTH, JR.
Lot 16, Block 1, Cole Place
100.00 L.F.
420.00 S.F.
248.30 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway 16'
4.97
0.41
0.85
497.00
172.20
211.06
880.26
124.
S. D. AMSPOKER
Lot 15, Block 1, Cole Place
100.00 L.F.
450.00 S.F.
164.30 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway 10'
4.97
0.41
0.85
497.00
184.50
139.66
821.16
• Sheet 24
Tarleton, Coleman, Mitchell Street Improvements
Zoned & Used. R -1 or R -2, C.G. & Pavement $
Zoned. & Used Other Than R -1 or R -2 p.l.f.$
Assessment Rate, Sidewalk per sq. ft. $
Assessment Rate, Driveway per sq. ft. $
1 J'EP4
N0.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
Mitchell Stre
t from Ocean
Drive to Santa Fe
100.00 L.F.
410.00 S.F.
276.30 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway 18'
125.
JOSEPH E. GARDNER, M.D.
4.97
0.41
0.85
497.00
168.10
234.86
899.86
126.
WALTER S. ROUSSEL
Lot 13, Block 1, Cole Place
100.00 L.F.
405.00 S.F.
290.30 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway 19'
4.97
0.41
0.85
497.00
166.05
246.76
gog.81
127.
I. B. MAGEE
All Lot 12 and N 45'
Lot 11, Block 1, Cole Park
145.00 L.F.
626.00 S.F.
301.50 S.F.
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway 19.8'
4.97
0.41
0.85
720.65
256.66
256.28
1,233.59
128.
BYRON N. COWARD
Lot 10 & S 55' Lot 11
Block 1, Cole Park
164.33 L.F.
821.65 S.F.
-o-
Curb,gutter,pvmt.
Sidewalk
Driveway
4.97
0.41
0.85
816.72
336.87
-0-
1,15 3.59
Santa Fe In'ersection
Eitd
West Side Michell
Street
End Mitc
ell Street
END PROJEC
0 ... . : I.,-----. .. .. 0
SECTION 4. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED THAT IN THE EVENT THE ACTUAL
FRONTAGE OF ANY PROPERTY HEREIN ASSESSED SHALL BE FOUND UPON THE COMPLETION
OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS TO BE GREATER OR LESS THAN THE NUMBER OF FEET HEREIN -
ABOVE STATED, THE ASSESSMENTS HEREIN SET AGAINST ANY SUCH PROPERTY AND AGAINST
THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, SHALL BE, AND THE SAME ARE HEREBY,
DECLARED TO BE INCREASED OR DECREASED AS THE CASE MAY BE, IN THE PROPORTION
WHICH SAID EXCESS OR DEFICIENCY OR FRONTAGE SHALL BEAR TO THE WHOLE NUMBER
OF FRONT FEET OF PROPERTY ACTUALLY IMPROVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FRONT FOOT
RULE OR RATE OF ASSESSMENT HEREIN ADOPTED, IT BEING THE INTENTION THAT EACH
PARCEL OF PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF ABUTTING
ON THE PORTION OF THE STREETS ABOVE DESCRIBED, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED,
SHALL PAY FOR SAID IMPROVEMENTS UNDER THE FRONT FOOT RULE OR PLAN, WHICH
RULE OR PLAN IS HEREBY FOUND AND DETERMINED TO BE JUST AND EQUITABLE AND TO
PRODUCE A SUBSTA :tJTIAL EQUALITY, HAVING IN VIEW THE SPECIAL BENEFITS TO BE
RECEIVED AND THE BURDENS IMPOSED THEREBY; AND IT IS FURTHER ORDAINED THAT
UPON FINAL COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS ON SAID PORTION OF
TARLETON STREET, COLEMAN STREET AND MITCHELL STREET, ALL CERTIFICATES HERE-
INAFTER PROVIDED FOR, ISSUED TO EVIDENCE SAID ASSESSMENTS AGAINST SAID PARCELS
OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREETS, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS
THEREOF, SHALL BE ISSUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, AND SHALL - EVIDENCE THE ACTUAL
FRONTAGE OF SAID PROPERTY AND THE ACTUAL COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS, THE
AMOUNT NAMED IN SAID CERTIFICATE IN NO CASE TO EXCEED THE AMOUNT HEREIN
ASSESSED AGAINST SUCH PROPERTY UNLESS SUCH INCREASE BE CAUSED BY AN EXCESS
OF FRONT FOOTAGE OVER THE AMOUNT HEREINABOVE STATED, SUCH ACTUAL COST AND
SUCH ACTUAL NUMBER OF FRONT FEET, IF DIFFERENT FROM THE HEREINABOVE SHOWN IN
SECTION 3 HEREOF, TO BE DETERMINED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS UPON COM-
PLETION OF SAID WORK ON SAID STREETS, AND THE FINDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR OF
PUBLIC WORKS SHALL BE FINAL AND BINDING UPON ALL PARTIES CONCERNED.
SECTION 5. THAT THE SEVERAL SUMS MENTIONED ABOVE IN SECTION 3
HEREOF ASSESSED AGAINST SAID PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING ON THE PORTION
OF THE HEREINABOVE NAMED STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, AND THE REAL
AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, WHETHER NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN OR NOT,
ME
0
•
SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 4 HEREOF, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST
THEREON AT THE RATE OF SIX AND ONE -HALF PERCENT (6 -112%) PER ANNUM WITH
REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEE AND ALL COSTS-AND EXPENSES OF COLLECTION, IF
INCURRED, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE MADE A FIRST AND PRIOR LIEN UPON THE
RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY, AGAINST WHICH SAME ARE ASSESSED FROM AND
AFTER THE DATE SAID IMPROVEMENTS WERE ORDERED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, TO -WIT:
FEBRUARY 21, 1968) AND A PERSONAL LIABILITY AND CHARGE AGAINST THE REAL AND
TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, WHETHER OR NOT SUCH OWNER OR OWNERS BE NAMED
OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN, AND THAT SAID LIEN SHALL BE AND CONSTITUTE
THE FIRST AND PRIOR ENFORCEABLE CLAII4 AGAINST THE PROPERTY ASSESSED AND
SHALL BE A FIRST AND PARAMOUNT LIEN SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER LIENS, CLAIMS
OR TITLE, EXCEPT FOR LAWFUL AD VALOREM TAXES; AND THAT THE SAME SO
ASSESSED SHALL BE PAYABLE AS FOLLOWS, TO -WIT: SIXTY (6O) EQUAL MONTHLY
INSTALLMENTS, '.fE FIRST OF WHICH WILL BE PAYABLE ON OR BEFORE TWENTY (20)
'DAYS AFTER THE COMPLETION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS TO THE STREETS UPON WHICH
THE RESPECTIVE PROPERTY ABUTS, AND ACCEPTANCE THEREOF BY THE SAID 61TY
COUNCIL, THE REMAINING INSTALLMENTS TO BE DUE AND PAYABLE, RESPECTIVELY,
ONE EACH MONTH BEGINNING SIXTY (60) DAPS AFTER THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE,
DEFERRED PAYMENTS TO BEAR INTEREST FROM DATE OF SAID ACCEPTANCE AT THE
RATE OF SIX AND,ONE -HALF PERCENT (6 -112 %) PER ANNUM,•PAYABLE MONTHLY
CONCURRENTLY WITH EACH OF SAID INSTALLMENTS; PAST DUE INSTALLMENTS OF
PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST TO BEAR INTEREST AT THE SAME RATE PER ANNUM UNTIL
PAID PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT ANY OWNER OF SUCH PROPERTY SHALL HAVE THE
RIGHT TO PAY OFF THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF SUCH ASSESSMENT, OR ANY INSTALLMENT
THEREOF, BEFORE MATURITY, BY PAYING PRINCIPAL AND ACCRUED INTEREST TO DATE
OF SAID PAYMENT; AND PROVIDED, FURTHER, THAT IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE
PAY14ENT OF ANY INSTALLMENT OF PRINCIPAL OR INTEREST WHEN DUE, THEN THE
ENTIRE AMOUNT OF SAID ASSESSMENT UPON WHICH SUCH DEFAULT IS MADE, SHALL
AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, THEIR SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS,
BE, AND BECOME IMMEDIATELY DUE AND PAYABLE AND SHALL BE COLLECTIBLE TOGETHER
WITH REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES AND ALL COSTS AND EXPENSES OF COLLECTION,
IF INCURRED.
SECTION 6. THAT THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, SHALL NOT
IN ANY MANNER BE LIABLE FOR THC PAYMENT OF ANY SUMS HEREBY VALIDLY
-9-
p J
�J
ASSESSED AGAINST ANY ABUTTING PROPERTY, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR
OWNERS THEREOF, BUT THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI SHALL LOOK SOLELY TO SUCH
PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, FOR THE PAYMENT OF
THE SUE-15 VALIDLY ASSESSED AGAINST SAID RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY,
AND IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY OF SAID SUMS HEREIN
ASSESSED AGAINST THE SAID PARCELS, OF PROPERTY, AND THE REAL AND TRUE
OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, COLLECTION THEREOF SHALL BE ENFORCED AT THE
OPTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, EITHER BY SUIT IN ANY COURT HAVING
JURISDICTION OR BY SALE OF THE PROPERTY.ASSESSED AS NEARLY AS POSSIBLE IN
THE HANKER AS MAY BE PROVIDED BY LAW AND CHARTER IN FORCE IN SAID CITY
FOR THE SALE OF PROPERTY FOR THE COLLECTION OF AD VALOREM TAXES.
SECTION 7. THAT FOR THE PURPOSE OF EVIDENCING SAID ASSESS-
MENTS, THE LIENS SECURING SAME AND THE SEVERAL SUMS ASSESSED AGAINST THE
SAID PARCELS OF �p,ROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF,
AND THE TIME AND TERMS OF PAYMENT, AND TO AID IN THE ENFORCEMENT THEREOF,
ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES SHALL BE ISSUED BY THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS, TO ITSELF UPON THE COMPLETION OF SAID INIPPOVE14ENTS IN SAID STREET
AND ACCEPTANCE THEREOF BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, WHICH CERTIFICATES SHALL BE
EXECUTED BY THE MAYOR IN THE NAME OF THE CITY ATTESTED BY THE CITY
SECRETARY WITH THE CORPORATE SEAL OF SAID CITY, AND WHICH CERTIFICATES
SHALL DECLARE THE AMOUNTS OF SAID ASSESSMENTS AND THE TIMES AND TERMS
THEREOF, THE RATE OF INTEREST THEP.EON, THE DATE OF THE COMPLETION AND
ACCEPTANCE OF THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR WHICH THE CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED,
AND SHALL CONTAIN THE NAMES OF THE APPARENT TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS AS
ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY ASSESSED
BY LOT AND BLOCK NUMBER, OR FRONT FOOT THEREOF, OR SUCH OTHER DESCRIP-
TION AS MAY OTHERWISE IDENTIFY THE SAME, AND IF THE SAID PROPERTY SHALL
BE OWNED BY A14 ESTATE OR FIRM, THEN TO SO STATE THE FACT SHALL BE SUF-
FICIENT AND NO ERROR OR MISTAKE IN DESCRIBING SUCH PROPERTY OR IN GIVING
THE NAME OF ANY OWNER OR OWNERS, OR OTHERWISE, SHALL IN ANYWISE INVALIDATE
OR IMPAIR THE ASSESSMENT LEVIED HEREBY OR THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED IN
EVIDENCE THEREOF.
THAT THE SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL FURTHER PROVIDE SUBSTANTIALLY
THAT IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY INSTALLMENT OF PRIFI-
CIPAL OR INTFREST 41IIEN DUE THEN AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY Of CORPUS CHRISTI,
as
THE WHOLE OF SAID ASSESSMENT EVIDENCED THEREBY SHALL AT ONCE BECOME DUE
AND PAYABLE, AND SHALL BE COLLECTIBLE WITH REASONABLE ATTORNEYS FEES
AND ALL EXPENSES A140 COSTS OF COLLECTION, IF INCURRED AND SAID CERTIFICATE
SHALL SET FORTH AND EVIDENCE THE ,PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE REAL AND TRUE
OWNER OR OWNERS OF SUCH PROPERTY, WHETHER NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED THEREIN
OR NOT, AND THE LIEN UPON SUCH PROPERTY AND THAT SAID LIEN IS FIRST AND
PARA14OUNT THEREON SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER LIENS; TITLES AND CHARGESj EXCEPT
FOR LAWFUL AD VALOREM TAXES, FROM AND.AFTER THE DATE SAID IMPROVEMENTS WERE
ORDERED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, TO -WIT: FEBRUARY 21, 1968, AND SHALL PROVIDE
IN EFFECT THAT IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT THEREOF, THE SAME
MAY BE ENFORCED AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY,'OF CORPUS CHRISTI OR THEIR
SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, BY THE SALE OF THE PROPERTY THEREIN DESCRIBED IN
THE MANNER PROVIDED FOR THE COLLECTION OF AD VALOREM TAXES AS ABOVE
RECITED OR BY %IT IN ANY COURT HAVING JURISDICTION.
THAT SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL FURTHER RECITE IN EFFECT THAT ALL
THE PROCEEDINGS WITH REFERENCE TO MAKING SAID IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN
REGULARLY HAD IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW AND CHARTER IN FORCE IN SAID CITY
AND THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY, AND THAT ALL PRE-
REQUISITES TO THE FIXING OF THE ASSESSMENT LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY THEREIN
DESCRIBED, OR ATTEMPTED TO BE DESCRIBED AND THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE
REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF EVIDENCED BY SUCH CERTIFICATES,
HAVE BEEN REGULARLY DONE AND PERFORMED WHICH RECITALS SHALL BE EVIDENCE
OF ALL THE MATTERS AND FACTS SO RECITED AND NO FURTHER PROOF THEREOF SHALLBE
REQUIRED IN ANY COURT. '
THAT SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL FURTHER PROVIDE IN EFFECT THAT THE
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI TEXAS, SHALL EXERCISE ALL OF, ITS LAWFUL POWERS, AS
THE HOLDER OF SAID CERTIFICATE] TO AID IN THE E14FORCENIENT AND COLLECTION
THEREOF, AND SAID CERTIFICATES MAY CONTAIN OTHER AND FURTHER RECITALS,
PERTINENT A14D APPROPRIATE THERETO. IT SHALL NOT BE NECESSARY THAT SAID
CERTIFICATES SHALL BE IN THE EXACT FORM AS ABOVE SET FORTH BUT THE
SUBSTANCE AND EFFECT THEREOF SHALL SUFFICE.
SECTION. 8. THAT ALL SUCH ASSESS14ENTS LEVIED ARE A PERSOMAL
LIABILITY'AND CHARGE AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE. OWNER OR O':1NERS OF THE
PROPERTY DESCRIBED, OR ATTEMPTED TO BE DESCRIBED, NOTWITHSTANDING SUCH OWNER
OR OWNERS MAY NOT BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED, AND ANY IRREGULARITY IN THE
NAME OF THE PROPERTY OWNER, OP. THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY PROPERTY OR THE
AMOUNT OF ANY ASSESSMENT, OR IN ANY OTHER NATTER OR THING SHALL NOT IN
ANYWISE INVALIDATE OR IM ?AIR ANY ASSESS:IENT LEVIED HEREBY OR ANY CERTIFICATE
ISSUED, AND SUCH MISTAKE, OR ERROR, INVALIDITY OR IRREGULARITY WHETHER IN
SUCH ASSESSMENT OR IN THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED IN EVIDENCE THEREOF, MAY BE, BUT
IT IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE, TO BE ENFORCEABLE, CORRECTED AT ANY TIME BY THE
SAID CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS. FURTHER THAT THE
OMISSION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS IN FRONT OF ANY PART OR PARCEL OF PROPERTY
ABUTTING UPON THE AFOREMENTIONED STREETS, WHICH IS EXEMPT FROM THE LIEN OF
SAID ASSESSMENT, SHALL IN NO WISE AFFECT OR 114PAIR THE VALIDITY OF ASSESS-
MENTS AGAINST THE, OTHER PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREETS;
W.
AND THAT THE TOTAL AMOUNTS ASSESSED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROP-
ERTY ABUTNNG UPON SAID STRETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFINED, AND THE
REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, ARE THE SAME AS, OR LESS THAN,
THE ESTIMATE- OF SAID ASSESSMENT PREPARED BY THE 'DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL AND ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID CITY COUNCIL RELATIVE TC SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND
ASSESSMENTS / THEREFOR, A14D WITH THE TERMS, POWER AND PR0VISII'0NS OF SAID
CHAPTER 100 OF THE ACTS OF THE FIRST - CALLED SESSION OF THE 40TH LEGIS-
LATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, KNOWN AS ARTICLE 1105B OF VERNON'S ANNOTATED
CIVIL STATUTES OF TEXAS AND THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
UNDER WHICH TERMS, POWERS AND PROVISIONS SAID PROCEEDINGS, SAID IMPROVEMENTS
AND ASSESSMENTS WERE HAD AND MADE BY SAID CITY COUNCIL.
SECTION 9. THE FACT THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STREET HAS BECOME
AN IMPORTANT THOROUGHFARE AND THE FACT THAT THE PRESENT CONDITION OF SAID
STREET, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, IS DANGEROUS TO THE HEALTH AND PUBLIC
WELFARE OF THE INHABITANTS THEREOF CREATES A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND AN
IMPERATIVE PUBLIC NECESSITY, REQUIRING THE SUSP NS1014 OF THE CHARTER RULE
THAT NO ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE OF
ITS INTRODUCTION, AND THAT SUCH ,ORDINANCE SHALL. BE READ AT THREE SEVERAL
MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND TILE MAY0R HAVINIG DECLARED THAT SUCH
EMERGENCY AND NECESSITY EXIST, AND HAVING REQUESTED THAT SUCH CHARTER RULE
CORPUS CHRISTI, ��,�TEXAS
lgaa DAY OF �9 lIlR
TO THE MEMBERS OF.THE CITY COUNCIL
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE OF THE FOREGOING
ORDINANCE, A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND IMPERATIVE NECESSITY EXIST FOR THE SUSPEN-
SION OF THE CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT THAT NO ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL
BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED AND THAT SUCH ORDINANCE OR
RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCILS 1, THEREFORE,
REQUEST THAT YOU SUSPEND SAID CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT AND PASS THIS ORDI-
NANCE FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED2 OR AT THE PRESENT MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL.
RESPECTFULLY
MAY, R
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
THE CHARTER RULE WAS SUSPENDED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
JACK R. BLACKMON 91 9
RONNIE SIZEMORE ate
V. A. "DICK" BRADLEY JR.
P. JIMENEZ, JR., M.D.
GABE LOZANO, SR.
KEN MCDANIEL al
W. J. "WRANGLER" ROBERTS 9,O
THE ABOVE ORDINANCE WAS PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
JACK R. BLACKMON
RONNIES SIZEMORE
V. A. "DICK" BRADLEY, JR. 01 A
P. JIMENEZ, JR., M.D. 211_
R
GABE LOZANO, SR.
��
KEN MCDANIEL
W. J. "WRANGLER" ROBERTS