The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09222 ORD - 02/05/1969BUW:2 /j /69 •. AN ORDINANCE CLOSING THE HEARING ON STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR OCEAN DRIVE FROM AIRLINE ROAD TO ALAMEDA, AND FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PROPERTY ABUTTING SAID STREET WILL BE SPECIFICALLY BENEFITTED AND ENHANCED IN VALUE IN EXCESS OF COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS, AND LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT; FIXING A CHARGE AND LIEN, THE MANNER AND TIME OF PAYMENT AND COLLECTION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, THE CITY COUNCIL OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, BY DULY ENACTED ORDINANCE PASSED AND APPROVED ON DECEMBER 30, 1968, DETERMINED THE NECESSITY FOR, AND ORDERED THE IMPROVEMENT OF OCEAN DRIVE, FROM AIRLINE ROAD TO ALAMEDA, IN THE MANNER AND ACCORDING TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS HERETOFORE APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL BY ORDINANCE DATED DECEMBER 301 1968) A DULY EXECUTED NOTICE OF SAID ORDINANCE HAVING BEEN FILED IN THE NAME OF SAID CITY WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS; AND WHEREAS, SAID CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, AFTER HAVING ADVERTISED FOR AND RECEIVED BIDS ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE LENGTH OF TIME AND IN THE MANNER AND FORM AS REQUIRED BY THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY AND THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, AND AFTER HAVING DULY AND REGULARLY MADE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR SUCH PURPOSE TO COVER THE ESTIMATED COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID CITY, ALL AS PROVIDED BY THE CORPUS CHRISTI CITY CHARTER AND BY LAW, DID AWARD A CON- TRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS TO HELDENFELS BROTHERS ON THEIR LOWEST AND MOST ADVANTAGEOUS BID AND SAID CONTRACT HAS BEEN HERETOFORE DULY EXECUTED BY SAID CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND HELDENFELS BROTHERS AND IS DATED , AND THE PERFORMANCE BOND REQUIRED BY SAID CON- TRACT HAS BEEN PROPERLY FURNISHED BY SAID HELDENFELS BROTHERS AND ACCEPTED BY THE SAID CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY AS TO FORM AND AMOUNT AS REQUIRED BY THE SAID CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY AS TO FORM AND AMOUNT AS REQUIRED BY THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY AND THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS; AND WHEREAS, THE SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS CAUSED THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO PREPARE AND FILE ESTIMATES OF THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND ESTIMATES OF THE AMOUNT PER FRONT FOOT PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON A PORTION OF OCEAN DRIVE, WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFINED, TO BE IMPROVED, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND SAID DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS HAS HERETOFORE FILED SAID ESTIMATES AND A STATEMENT OF OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO WITH SAID CITY COUNCIL, AND SAME HAS BEEN RECEIVED, EXAMINED AND APPROVED BY SAID CITY COUNCILS AND WHEREAS, SAID CITY COUNCIL, BY DULY ENACTED ORDINANCE DATED DECEMBER 30, 1968, DID DETERMINE THE NECESSITY OF LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT FOR THAT PORTION OF THE COST OF CONSTRUCTING SAID IMPROVEMENTS ON THE ABOVE -NAMED STREET, WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFINED, TO BE PAID BY THE ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND BY ORDINANCE DATED DECEMBER 30, 1968, DID ORDER AND SET A HEARING TO BE HELD AT 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M. ON JANUARY 27,1969, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CITY HALL OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, FOR THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREET, WITHIN THE LIMITS ABOVE DEFINED, AND FOR ALL OTHERS OWNING OR CLAIMING ANY INTEREST IN, OR OTHERWISE INTERESTED IN SAID PROPERTY, OR ANY OF SAID MATTERS AS TO THE ASSESSMENTS AND AMOUNTS TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PARCEL OF ABUTTING PRO- PERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AND AS TO THE SPECIAL BENEFITS TO ACCRUE TO SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY BY VIRTUE OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS, IF ANY, OR CONCERNING ANY ERROF, INVALIDITY, IRREGULARITY OR DEFICIENCY IN ANY PROCEEDINGS, OR CONTRACT, TO APPEAR AND BE HEARD IN PERSON OR BY COUNSEL AND OFFER EVIDENCE IN REFERENCE TO SAID MATTERS; AND THE CITY COUNCIL DID BY SAID ORDINANCE ORDER AND DIRECT THE CITY TO GIVE NOTICE OF SAID HEARING TO THE OWNERS ABUTTING UPON SAID STREET AS SHOWN BY THE CURRENT AD VALOREM TAX ROLL BY MAILING SUCH NOTICE TO SUCH OWNERS AND PUBLISHING SAID NOTICE AT LEAST THREE TIMES IN THE CORPUS CHRISTI TIMES BEFORE THE DATE OF THE HEARING, SUCH NOTICE BY MAIL AND BY PUBLICATION BEING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 11058 OF VERNON'S ANNOTATED CIVIL STATUTES OF TEXAS; AND WHEREAS, SUCH NOTICE WAS GIVEN SAID OWNERS OF PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON THE CURRENT AD VALOREM TAX ROLL WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE STREET BEING IMPROVED BY MAILING SUCH NOTICE AT LEAST FOURTEEN (14) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO SUCH OWNERS AND BY PUBLISHING THREE TIMES NOTICE OF SUCH HEARING IN THE CORPUS CHRISTI TIMES, THE FIRST OF WHICH PUBLICATION WAS AT LEAST -2- • • P • TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF SAID HEARING; BOTH FORMS OF NOTICE BEING IN COMPLIANCE WITH AND CONTAINING THE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY ARTICLE 1105B, VERNON'S ANNOTATED CIVIL STATUTES; AND WHEREAS, AFTER DUE, REGULAR AND PROPER NOTICE THEREOF, ALL AS PRO- VIDED BY LAW AND THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, SAID HEARING OF WHICH NOTICE WAS GIVEN, WAS OPENED AND HELD ON JANUARY 27, ig6g, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER AT CITY HALL IN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, IN ACCORD- ANCE WITH SAID ORDINANCE AND NOTICE, AT WHICH TIME AN OPPORTUNITY WAS GIVEN TO ALL SAID ABOVE - MENTIONED PERSONS, FIRMS, CORPORATIONS AND ESTATES, THEIR AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS, TO BE HEARD AND TO OFFER EVIDENCE AS TO ALL MATTERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID ORDINANCE AND NOTICE, AT WHICH TIME THE FOLLOWING APPEARED AND OFFERED THE FOLLOWING TESTIMONY: -3- • MINUTES CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING January 27, 1969 1:30 P.M. PRESENT: Mayor Jack R. Blackmon Mayor Pro Tern Ronnie Sizemore Commissioners: Dick Bradley, Jr. Dr. P.,Jimenez, Jr. Gabe Lozano, Sr. Ken McDaniel City Manager R. Marvin Townsend City Attorney I. M. Singer City Secretary T. Ray Kring 10 Mayor Jack R. Blackmon called the meeting to order and directed that it be not that the Cou it was all present with the exception of Commissioner Roberts. Mayor Black n recognized two members of the Corpus Christi for Chamber of Commerce, Kenny Reagan an Terry Wood. Mr. Reagan stated a purpose of their presence was to advise the Council that the J ees will appear all service club meetings this week to distribute lists of voter registration sub -sto ' s and copies of voter registration application forms to stress the fact that as of now y 30,000 pe ns have registered to vote in 1969 in comparison to the 90,000 regi red last year, and to urge em oyers to encourage employees, friends and associates register to vote. Copies of the Service Club esentotion and Voter Registration F s were left in the Council Chamber. oyor Blackmon commended and thanked Mr. Wood and Mr. Reagan for callin this important matter to the attention of the Council. Mayor Blackmon announced the Council would now hold the scheduled public hearing on Assessments for the proposed street improvements on Ocean Drive, Unit IV, from 595' East of Airline Road to South Alameda Street and including Intersection Improvement at Alameda and Ocean Drive; explained the procedure to be followed; that each member of the Council had been furnished a copy of the Preliminary Assessment Roll; that the Staff would offer testimony from the City Engineer and evaluation testimony from a real estate appraiser to substantiate the assessments which appear on the Preliminary Assessment Roll, and that the hearing was to form a basis on which the Council, acting as a legislative body, would determine or establish the assessments on the abutting properties. Minutes Special Council Meeting January 27, 1969 Page 2 Mr. James K. Lantos, City Engineer, presented the plans for the proposed improve- ments; testified as to the nature, extent, type, and specifications; stated that the total contract price was $1,024,307.40; property owners assessment, $114,468.23, and the City's portion, $909,839.17; and explained the manner in which such pro rata share was computed. He explained that the construction period will get underway within the next two months and completed by late fall or early winter of 1969, and that ingress and egress will be provided property owners during this period. Assistant City Attorney Tom McDowell conducted the public hearing and called the City's expert witness to testify as to his background and experience which he felt qualified him as a real estate appraiser for all types of properties in the City. Mr. Harold Carr stated that he had personally viewed each individual piece of property; understood the extent and specifications of the proposed improvements; and stated that after reviewing the plans and specifications and observing the properties on the ground, in his opinion, the properties would be enhanced in value at least to the extent of the proposed assessments with a few exceptions for which he would recommend that adjustments be made. Mr. Carr described the street by showing colored slides beginning with the completed portions all the way to the Alameda Junction, pointing out individual property lines, location of driveways and utilities, drainage ditches, and rough shoulders, and described the present condition of the roadway in general. Mr. Carr recommended reductions and adjustments in the assessments as follows: Item 471, Binford Arney, Lot 16 -B, Block 7, South Shores Estates; Item 472, Fred W. Heldenfels, Lot 15 -B, Block 7, South Shores Estates; Item 073, H. C. Heldenfels, Lot 14 -13, Block 7, South Shores Estates; Mr. Carr explained that the foregoing properties are instances where the owner owns property on the water side of the street and that the deed restrictions are such so as to pro- hibit the use of the land as residential, and for this reason he would recommend a reduction of 75% of the assessment shown on the Assessment Rol I. Minutes Special Council Meeting January 27, 1969 Page 3 Item #63, Norman Ronsleben, Lot 10, 11, Block 4, Edgewater Terrace - due to the reduction in size of this property as a result of the improvement project, which leaves only a small portion which could be used, Mr. Carr stated he does not see any benefit to the property owner by virtue of the proposed improvements, and therefore, recommends that no assessment be placed on this item. Item 0104, Samuel Frech, Lot 7, Block 8, Edgewater Terrace - Mr. Carr explained that this property faces on Edgewater Terrace and backs up to Alameda Street, and that in his opinion this property would not be benefitted more than 25% of the $524.40 as shown on the Assessment Roll, and would recommend an adjustment accordingly. Mayor Blackmon stated he would call the names of the property owners as they are listed on the assessment roll and invited each property owner to state his approval or objection to any of the proposed improvements or assessments to his property. The following persons appeared: Mr. Binford Arney, attorney representing himself in connection with Item 08, Lot 16B; Fred Heldenfels, Item 09, Lot 1513; and H. C. Heldenfels, Item #10, Lot 1413, all in South Shore Estates, Unit 1, appeared and filed a written protest constituting formal objection and contest of the paving assessments calculated or proposed to be assessed against the respective owners. He pointed out that the aforementioned Lots 16B, 15B and 14B in Block 7, are separated from Lots 16, 15, and 14, and that the protest is related solely to proposed assessments against the unimproved, restricted and limited land areas of Lots 16B, 15B, and 14B on the Bay side of Ocean Drive, on the basis that (1) the City's Ocean Drive Improvements will not confer special benefits to the property assessed, (2) the assessments proposed are in excess of any special benefits to the property assessed, and (3) the statutory authorization by which the City can levy paving assessments requires the governing body to adjust proposed assessments (made on a front foot basis) so as to %;,k, .4rrr ey producea substantial equality of benefits received and burdens imposed. M==15= stated that it would appear that the condition of these three lots is unique from practically all other lots involved in the Improvements in that they are not considered building sites; that the surface area on or above the level with Ocean Drive is but approximately 20 feet to • , e ' • Minutes Special Council Meeting January 27, 1969 Page 4 6 feet in depth followed by an abrupt bluff drop to the water, making it wholly insufficient for improvements, and requested that the assessments be deleted, or adjusted downward from the original proposed assessments on these lots, to produce equality of benefits. He further stated that this protest could be considered moot if the actual paving assessments made by this Council be but 25% of the respective proposed assessments. Mr. Raymond L. Smith, appeared in connection with Item 664, Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Edgewater Terrace which is zoned other than "R -1" or "R -2 ", and protested the $17.15 p.l.f. rate, stating he felt it to be excessive. It was pointed out that this property is zoned for single family or duplex, but that a Texaco Station is located on the property, and that it could be sold for a greater amount. Mr. Smith stated this protest also applied to Item #102, Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 2, Edgewater Terrace, also zoned "R -1" or "R -2 ". Items 084, Lot 1, Block 1, and Item #85, Lot 2, Block 1, both in Waverly Estates, Unit 2 - Mr. Victor G. Vaughn, appeared representing himself in connection with Item #84 and his son, Item #85, and stated the assessment discriminates against Ocean Drive property owners because the improvement will be for the benefit of the general public. He stated that he places no blame on City Officials; that if he chose to spend enough money and time, the law could probably be changed, but that the cost would be many times the amount of his assessment, and at his age, he probably would not live long enough for it to reach the Supreme Court. He further stated that the only logical alternative was to vote against all future bond issues and so inform other affected residents that they are voting for special assessments. The protest was filed with the City Secretary in writing. No one else appeared to be heard in connection with the proposed street improvements. Mayor Blackmon stated that the objections and protests would be reviewed by the Council and each would be given due consideration. Motion by Jimenez, seconded by Sizemore and passed, that the hearing be closed. Motion by McDaniel, seconded by Bradley and passed, that the paving assessments for Ocean Drive Improvements, Unit IV, be tabled and taken under advisement. There being no further business to come before the Counci I, the meeting was adjourned. THERE BEING NO FURTHER TESTIMONY OFFERED OR ANY FURTHER PARTIES APPEARING TO BE HEARD, UPON PROPER MOTION, DULY SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED, THE SAID HEARING WAS DECLARED CLOSED; AND WHEREAS, NO FURTHER PARTIES APPEARING AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY BEING OFFERED AS TO THE SPECIAL BENEFITS IN RELATION TO THE ENHANCED VALUE OF SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY AS COMPARED TO COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS OF SAID PORTION OF SAID STREET PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST SAID PROPERTY, OR AS TO ANY ERRORS, INVALIDITIES OR IRREGULARITIES, IN THE PROCEEDINGS OR CONTRACT HERETOFORE HAD IN REFERENCE TO THE PORTIONS OF SAID STREET TO BE IMPROVED; AND WHEREAS, SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS HEARD EVIDENCE AS TO THE SPECIAL BENEFITS AND ENHANCED VALUE TO ACCRUE TO SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AS COMPARED WITH THE COST OF MAKING SAID IMPROVEMENTS ON SAID STREET, WITHIN THE LIMITS ABOVE DEFINED, AND HAS HEARD ALL PARTIES APPEARING AND OFFERING TESTIMONY, TOGETHER WITH ALL PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS RELATIVE TO SUCH MATTERS AND AS TO ANY ERRORS, INVALIDITIES OR IRREGULARITIES IN ANY OF THE PROCEED- INGS AND CONTRACT FOR SAID IMPROVEMENTS, AND HAS GIVEN A FULL AND FAIR HEARING TO ALL PARTIES MAKING OR DESIRING TO MAKE ANY SUCH PROTEST, OBJECTION OR OFFER TESTIMONY AND HAS FULLY EXAMINED AND CONSIDERED ALL EVIDENCE, MATTERS, OBJECTIONS AND PROTESTS OFFERED AND BASED UPON SAID EVIDENCE, TESTIMONY AND STATEMENTS, SAID CITY COUNCIL FINDS THAT EACH AND EVERY PARCEL OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE PORTION OF OCEAN DRIVE, WITHIN THE LIMITS TO BE IMPROVED AS HEREIN DEFINED, WILL BE ENHANCED IN VALUE AND SPECIALLY BENEFITTED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS UPON THE SAID STREET UPON WHICH SAID PROPERTY ABUTS, IN AN AMOUNT IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO BE, AND AS HEREINBELOW,ASSESSED AGAINST EACH AND EVERY SAID PARCEL OF ABUTTING PROPERTY, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND SAID CITY COUNCIL DID CONSIDER AND CORRECT ALL ERRORS, INVALIDITIES OR DEFICIENCIES CALLED TO ITS ATTENTION AND DID FIND THAT ALL PROCEEDINGS AND CONTRACTS WERE PROPER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY AND THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, UNDER WHICH THOSE PROCEEDINGS WERE BEING HAD 7 AND THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID CITY COUNCIL HERETOFORE HAD WITH REFERENCE TO SUCH IMPROVEMENTS, AND IN ALL RESPECTS TO BE VALID AND REGULAR; AND SAID CITY COUNCIL DID FURTHER FIND UPON SAID EVIDENCE THAT THE ASSESS- MENTS HEREINBELOW MADE AND THE CHARGES HEREBY DECLARED AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY ON SAID PORTION OF SAID OCEAN DRIVE, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, ARE JUST AND EQUITABLE AND DID ADOPT THE RULE OF APPORTIONMENT SET OUT BELOW AND THE DIVISION OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN SAID ABUTTING PROPER- TIES, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AS JUST AND EQUITABLE, AND AS PRODUCING SUBSTANTIAL EQUALITY CONSIDERING THE BENEFITS TO BE RECEIVED AND THE BURDENS IMPOSED THEREBY, AND THAT ALL OBJECTIONS AND PROTESTS SHOULD BE OVERRULED AND DENIED EXCEPT THE CORRECTIONS AND CHANGES AS APPEAR ON THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL INCLUDED IN THIS ORDINANCE: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. THAT THERE BEING NO FURTHER PROTEST OR TESTIMONY FOR OR AGAINST SAID IMPROVEMENTS, SAID HEARING GRANTED TO THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF ABUTTING PROPERTY ON SAID STREET, WITHIN THE LIMITS ABOVE DEFINED, AND TO ALL PERSONS, FIRMS, CORPORATIONS AND ESTATES, OWNING OR CLAIMING SAME OR ANY INTEREST THEREIN, BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY CLOSED AND ALL PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS, WHETHER SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED OR NOT, SHALL BE, AND THE SAME ARE HEREBY OVERRULED AND DENIED. SECTION 2. THAT SAID CITY COUNCIL HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES UPON THE EVIDENCE HEARD IN REFERENCE TO EACH AND EVERY PARCEL OR PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON OCEAN DRIVE, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, THAT THE SPECIAL BENEFITS IN THE ENHANCED VALUE TO ACCRUE TO SAID PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, BY VIRTUE OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID PORTION OF SAID STREET UPON WHICH SAID PROPERTY ABUTS, WILL BE IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS AS PROPOSED TO BE, AND AS HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND FINDS THAT THE APPORTIONMENT OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS, AND THAT ALL ASSESSMENTS HEREINBELOW MADE ARE JUST AND EQUITABLE AND PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL EQUALITY CONSIDERING -5- • �J THE BENEFITS RECEIVED AND THE BURDENS IMPOSED THEREBY, AND ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, AND THE CHARTER PRO- VISIONS OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI TEXAS, AND THAT THE PROCEEDINGS AND CONTRACT HERETOFORE HAD WITH REFERENCE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ALL RESPECTS REGULARS PROPER AND VALID AND THAT ALL PREREQUISITES TO THE FIXING OF THE ASSESSMENT LIENS AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTIES, AS HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED AND THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, WHETHER NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN OR NOTE HAVE BEEN IN ALL THINGS REGULARLY HAD AND PERFORMED IN C014PLIANCE WITH THE LAW, CHARTER PROVISIONS AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE SAID CITY COUNCIL. SECTION 3. THAT IN PURSUANCE OF SAID ORDINANCES] DULY ENACTED BY SAID CITY COUNCILS AUTHORIZING AND ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STREET, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, AND IN PURSUANCE OF SAID PROCEEDINGS HERETOFORE HAD AND ENACTED BY SAID CITY COUNCILS IN REFERENCE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND BY VIRTUE OF THE POWERS VESTED IN SAID CITY WITH RESPECT TO SAID STREET IMPROVEMENTS BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS AND THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO CHAPTER 106 OF THE ACTS OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE 40TH LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS KNOWN AND SHOWN AS ARTICLE 11058 OF VERNON'S ANNOTATED CIVIL STATUTES OF TEXAS AS AMENDED, THERE SHALL BE, AND IS HEREBY LEVIED ASSESSED AND TAXED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID PORTION OF SAID STREETS AND AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, WHETHER SUCH REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN OR NOTE THE SEVERAL SUMS OF MONEY HEREINSELOW MENTIONED AND ITEMIZED OPPOSITE THE DESCRIPTION OF THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF SAID PROPERTY THE NUMBER OF FRONT FEET OF EACH AND THE SEVERAL AMOUNTS ASSESSED AGAINST SAME AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF AND NAMES OF THE APPARENT OWNERS THEREOF ALL AS CORRECTED AND ADJUSTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, BEING AS FOLLOWS TO -WIT: -6- Februaxy 6, 1969 - Final CORRECTED ASSESSMENT ROLL OCEAN DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS UNIT IV From 595' East of Airline Road to South Alameda St. and Including Intersection Improvement at Alameda and Ocean Drive This project Number 220 -67 -97 includes the reconstruction of Ocean Drive from 595' East of Airline Road to Alameda Street. The improvements consist of excavation to a width to permit the construction of curbs and gutters, the placing of 9" lime- stabilized base, 9" compacted caliche base, the application of a prime coat; and the laying of 200# per S.Y. of Type A Asphaltic Concrete, and 125# per S.Y. of Type D Asphaltic Concrete. Width of street varies at intersections, but generally it is 73' from face to face of curbs on either side of street. This width provides two moving lanes in each direction, one safety shoulder, each direction, and 8' wide median in the center with varying widths at intersections. Median consists of curb and gutter, filled with tap soil for future landscaping. Concrete sidewalks are included along all the west side from 3' to 5' wide and tied to the curb. Concrete driveways are also included, which are to be built as shown in the plans unless otherwise changed by the owners, and the City. Assessment rates have been calculated on the basis of applying the unit prices' obtained by bids and calculation of the quantities for the improvement abutting the property. Credits have been given to property owners for the existing concrete driveways and curbs and gutters in public right -of -way. Credits have also been given to property owners for other improvements such as standard curbs and gutters. The assessment rates are as follows: 1. Property zoned and used R -1 or R -2 Curb, gutter, and pavement $ 5.88 p.l,f. 2. Property zoned or used other that R -1 or R -2 Curb, gutter, and pavement 17.15 p.l.f. Sidewalk .43 P.S.O. Driveway .85 p.scf, Total Contract Price $1,024,307.40 Property Owners Assessment 1-6',375.50 City's Portion of Cost — $ The project also includes the construction of a concrete seawall along Ocean Drive from approximately Poenisch Drive to Palmetto Street for the purpose of controlling erosion of the road. "• " ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJECT: Ocean Drive Improvements - Unit 4 CONTRACTOR: Heldenfels Brothers ASSESSMENT RATES Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2 Curb, Gutter & Pavement.p.l.f. = 5.88 Zoned or Used other than R -1 or R -2 C. G. & Pvmt. p:.1.f. = 17.15 Plain Sidewalk P.'s.f. _ .43 Plain Driveway p.s.f. _ �5 Exp. Ag. Driveway p.s.f. _ .94 Exp. Ag. Sidewalk p.s.f. _ ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSEI Ocean Irive Improvem is - Unit 4 From AirLine Road to Alameda Street I'Be 'nning At Airl ne Road West Side 1. BENJ. E.SiE MAN, JR. A tract of land containing 4.707 ac. & out of Lots 3 & 6, See. 1 90.0 L.F. 234.0 S.F. Curb,gatter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 529.20 100.62 F.B.E.F. &.G.T. 50.8 riveway .85 43.18 -67-3 --0 2. MURPHY L. WALKER Lot A -1, Tanglewood 281.26 L.F. b,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 1,653.81 570.78 S.F. 3iftewalk .43 245.45 90.80 iveway .85 77.18 1,97 3• CECIL E. GURNEY Lot H -2, Tanglewood 236.67 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 L,391.62 66.01 S.F. Sidewalk .43 243.38 61.8 - Driveway .85 137.53 1,772.5? r PROJECT: Ocean Drive Improvements - Unit 4 CONTRACTOR: Heldenfels Brothers • 2 ITEM NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY ASSESSED DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT `DOTAL AMOUNT ASSESS: 4. M. E. FROELICK ! Lot 3, Timberlake Addition *127.12 L.F. Pavement Only 4.18 531.36 ' 381.00 Sidewalk .43 163.83 -0- Driveway 0.00 0.00 Loma Interse tion 5. GUY I. WARREN A portion of lot 1. Section 15, 264.75 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 1,556.73 F.B.E.F. & G.T. 794.25 S.F. Sidewalk .43 341.53 -O- Driveway .85 -0- 1 6. GUY I. wARREN Lot 18, South Shores Estate, Unit 1, Block 7 150.0 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 882.00 450.0 S.F. Sidewalk .43 193.50 -0- Driveway .85 -0- 1,075.: PROJECT: Ocean Drive improvements - Unit 4 CONTRACTOR: Heldenfels Brothers ^ ITEM NO, I OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY ASSESSED DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT TOTAL AMOK ASSESSES 7. GUY I. WARREN Lot 17, South Shores Estate Unit 1, Block 7 145.0 L.F. Curb,gatter,pvmt. 5.88 852.60 435.0 S.F. Sidewalk .43 187.05 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 1,5 8•. BINFORD ARNEY Lot 16, South Shores Estate Unit 1, Block 7 *170.0 L.F. Pavement only 4.18 710.60 357.00 S.F Sidewalk .43 153.51 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 I I 9. FRED W. BELDENFELS Lot 15, South Shores Estate, Unit 1, Block 7 *170.0 L.F. 'Pavement only 4.18 710.60 357.00 S.F. Sidewalk .43 153.51 -0- _ Driveway .85 0.00 13 f r i, g E *Credit improvements in of cP I w G PROJECT: Ocean Drive Improvements - Unit 4_ CONTRACTOR: Heldenfels Brothers ITEM NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY ASSESSED DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSKI 10. H. C. HELDENFELS t Lot 14, South Shores Estate, Unit 1, Block 7 -170.0 L.F. Pavement only 4.18 710.60 465.0 S.F. Sidewalk .43 199.95 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 910.5 South ores Place I tersection 11. MAY D. CARR, TRUSTEE Lot 14, Block 10 South Shores Estate Unit 1 150.0 L.F. Curb,gatter,pvmt. 5.88 882.00 450.0 S.F. Sidewalk .43 193.50 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 1,075.5 12. MAY D. CARR,TRUSTEE Lot 15, Block 10, South Shores Estate Unit 152.27 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 895.35 456.81 S.F. Sidewalk .43 196.43 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 1,091.7 I• ,-'. PRaTECT: Ocean Drive Tmarovemen }R - unit 1s CONTRACTOR: Heldenfels Brothers • ITEM NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY ASSESSED DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT 'TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSEL 13. JAMES D. PETERSON Lot 16, Block 10, South Shores Estate Unit 1 170.0 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 999.60 420.0 S.F. Sidewalk .43 180.60 ' 116.6 S.F. Driveway 2 -15' •85 99.11 1,27F.3i 14. LAURENCE A. McNEIL Lot 17, Block 10, South Shores Estate Unit 1 170.0 L.F. Carb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 999.60 414.0 S.F. Sidewalk .43 178.02 121.6 S.F. Driveway 1 -15' & .85 103.36 1 -17' 1,2$0.9' 15. DR. ROBERT L. FORDTRAN Lot 18, Block 10 South Shores Estate Unit 1 170.0 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 999.60 510.0 S.F. Sidewalk .43 219.30 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 , 2 1-9� PROJECT: Ocean Drive Improvements - Unit 4 CONTRACTOR: Aeldpnfels Rrotberc ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSEI A. E. J. SEAMAN Lots 12, 11, 10, & 9,Block 1 Shoreline Estates 99.65 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 585.94 247.95 S.F. Sidewalk .43 106.62 63.30 S.F. Driveway .85 53.81 77C. 3-7 17• Harry H. pobbs Lots 8 -7 -6 & 5, Block 1, Shoreline Estates 100.0 L.F. Curb,gatter,pvmt. 5.88 588.00 186.0 S.F. Sidewalk .43 79.98 130.4 S.F. Driveway .85 110.84 77.2 18. 0. B. VAUGHN Lots 4, 3, 2, & 1, Block 1, Shoreline Estates 99.96 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 587.77 299.88 S.F. Sidewalk .43 128.95 -0- -- Driveway .85 0.00 71 .72 • PROJECT: Ocean Drive Tmnrovements - Unit h. CONTRACTOR: geldenfels Brothers .• ITEM NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY ASSESSED DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSE1 E Bayshore-Baycliff Drive 19. JEAN RUSSELL WHEELER Lots 31 -32 -33 & 34, Block 2, Shoreline Estates 100.0 L.F. 249.0 S.F. 53.0 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk Driveway 5.88 .43 .85 588.00 107.07 45.05 7 .12 20. C. A. STRUBE Lots 35 -36-37 & 38, Block 2 Shoreline Estates 100.0 L.F. 204.0 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 588.00 87.72 89.1 S.F. Driveway .85 75.74 751. 21. REYNOLDO GARCIA Lots 39 -4o -41 & 42, Block 2 Shoreline Estates 100.0 L.F. 222.0 S.F. 84.8 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidwalk Driveway 5.88 .43 .85 588.00 95.46 72.08 757.54 PROJECT: Ocean Drive Improvements - Unit 4 CONTRACTOR: Heldenfels Brothers ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESEEI 22. J. E. BRUMFIELD Lot 2, Block 2, Montclair Addn. 72.68 L.F. 173.04 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 427.36 74.41 58.3 S.F. Driveway .85 49.56_ 551 33 23. B. HELEN CLARK Lot 1, Block 2, Montclair Addn. 72.69 L.F. 218.07 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 427.42 93.77 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 521.19 Montclair Drive Intersection 24. DR. F. W. YEAGER Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, Montclair Addn. 145.67 L.F. 437.01 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 856.5 187.9 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 ,o 5 25. NORMAN L. REMO , M. D. Lot 13, Block 1 Surfview Estate, No. 1 110.28 L.F. 330.84 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 648.45 142.26 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 790.71 PROJECT: Ocean Drive Improvements - Unit 4 CONTRACTOR: Heldenfels mothers ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSEI t.'Poe isch Drive Intersection 26. EMIL G. HABEEB Lot 55, Lee Manor Subdivision (replat) 99.86 L.F. 299.58 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 587.1 128.8 -0- Driveway .85 0.0 71 .00 27. HORACIO R. VILLARREAI M.D. Lot 54, Lee Manor Subdivision (replat) 100.26 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 589.5 222.78 S.F. Sidewalk .43 95.8 93.0 S.F. Driveway .85 79.05 76-17-.37 28. JAMES I. TYREE, M.D. Lot 53, Lee Manor Subdivision (replat) 100.26 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 589.53 156.78 S.F. Sidewalk .43 67.42 134.4 S.F. Driveway .85 114.24 711.19 PROJECT: Ocean Drive Improvements - Unit 4_ CONTRACTOR: Heldenfels Brothers o• 10 ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSEL 29• J. W. McCORMICK, JR. Lot 52, Lee Manor Subdivision (replat) 100.26 L.F. Carb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 589.53 213.72 S.F. Sidewalk .43 91.90 109.0 S.F. Driveway .85 92.65 77 .0: 30. JOHN H. THOMASON Lot 51, Lee Manor Subdivision (replat) 95.24 L.F. 213.72 S.F. 81.1 Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk Driveway 5.88 .43 .85 560.01 91.90 68.94 720.F5 31• EUGENE URBAN Lot 50, Lee Manor Subdivision ( replat) 95.24 L.F. 174.72 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 560.01 75.13 103.0 S.F. Driveway .85 87.55 722. 9 32. DR. SANFORD GLANZ Lot 49, Lee Manor Subdivision ( replat) 95.24 L.F. 153.72 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 560.01 66.10 141.8 S.F. Driveway .85 120.53 7 0. PROJECT: Ocean Drive Improvements - Unit 4_ CONTRACTOR: Helden els Brothers .• 11 ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSEI 33. WM. D. BONILLA Lot 48, Lee Manor Subdivision (replat) 110.13 L.F. 330.39 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 647.56 142.07 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 -779-.6-3- PalmeLuto Street Int rsection 34. R. JAMES L. FITZGERALD Lot 1, Block 3 Ocean Drive Addn. 120.44 L.F. 361. 32 S.F. b,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 708.19 155.37 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 3.5 35• JOSE R. DE LEON Lot 2, Block 3, Ocean Drive Addn. 80.44 L.F. b,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 472.99 181.13 S.F. Sidewalk .43 77.89 70.8 S.F. Driveway .85 60.18 611.06 36. BEN E. CHRISTIAN Lot 3, Block 3, Ocean Drive.Addn. 100.43 L.F. 265.29 S.F. b,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 590.53 114.07 50.8 S.F. Driveway .85 43.18 777--78 • PROJECT: Ocean Drive Tmprovements - Unit 4 . CONTRACTOR: Heldenfels Brothers 12 ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSEI 37. IRWIN R. wBIPPLE Lot 4, Block 3, Ocean Dr. Addn. 100.44 L.F. Carb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 590.591 301.32 S.F. Sidewalk .43 129.57 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 720.1 38. SIMS P. BROOKS Lot 5, Block 3, Ocean Dr. Addn. 100.43 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 590.53 258.00 L.F. Sidewalk .43 110.94 55.08 S.F. Driveway .85 46.82 7 .29 39• SHANNON GWINN, M.D. Lot 6, Block 3, Ocean Dr. Addn. 100.43 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 590.54 ' 223.29 S.F. Sidewalk .43 96.01 85.80 S.F. Driveway .85 72.93 759-ITE Clan ore Street I tersection 40. ANNIE BLAKE MORGAN HEAD Lots 1, 2 & 3, Block 4, Ocean Drive Addn. 300.18 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 1,765.06 846.54 S.F. Sidewalk .43 364.01 65.8 S.F. Driveway .85 55.93 119-5---00 13 PROJECT: Ocean Drive Improvements - Unit 4- CONTRACTOR: Heldeniels Brothers ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE A14OUNT ASSESSEZ 41. FRED BOWMAN � Lot 4, Block 4, Ocean Drive Addition 100.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.85 588.00 264.0 S.F. Sidewalk .43 7 -13.52 50.8 S.F. Driveway .85 43.18 77.7-0 42. ROBERT C. EDWARDS Lot 5, Block 4, Ocean Drive Addition 100.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 588.00 264.0 S.F. Sidewalk .43 113.52 50.8 S.F. Driveway .85 43.18 771F 7-0 43. JOS. HANS Lot 6, Block 4 Ocean Drive Addition 100.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 588.00 264.0 S.F. Sidewalk .43 113.52 50.8 S.F. Driveway .85 43.18 7 .70 Glermore Street Intersection 44. JEAN MAHLER Lot 3, Block 2, Waverly Est. P 100.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 588.00 300.0 S.F. Sidewalk .43 129.00' -0- S.F. Driveway .85 0.00 717.00 PROJECT: n sn TTrjve Tmarovem me - Unit,!L CONTRACTOR: Helden_vela Brothers .10. 14 ' I ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSED 45. JAMES W. SMITH + Lot 2, Block 2, Waverly Est. J2 100.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 588.00 225.0 S.F. Sidewalk .43 96.75 96.0 S.F. Driveway .85 81.60' 766-.35 46. BENJAMIN D. HOLT 5.88 588.00 Lot 3, Block 2, Waverly Est. P2 100.00 L.F. Curb,gatter,pvmt. 225.0 S.F. Sidewalk .43 96.75 96.0 S.F. Driveway .85 81.60 7 •35 47• BENJAMIN D. HOLT Lot 4, Block 2 Waverly Est. J2 100.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 588.00 300.0 S.F. Sidewalk .43 129.00- -0- Driveway .85 0.00 '717.00 48. FAIRES P. WADE Lot 5, Block 2, Waverly Est. #2 100.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 588.00 258.0 S.F. Sidewalk .43 110.94, 55.8 S.F. Driveway .85 47.43 7 .37 • PROJECT: Ocean Drive Improvements - Unit 4 CONTRACTOR: Heldenfels Brothers .9 ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED of AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSEI 49. WILLIAM B. ANDERSON Lot 6, Block 21 Waverly Est. P 122.30 L.F. 366.90 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 719.12 157.77 -0- Driveway .85 -0- 7.9 WaVE rly Drive intE rsection 50. ANNIE B. SMITH Lot 1, Block 3, Waverly Est. J2 122.30 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5,$8 719.12 366.90 S.F. Sidewalk 43 157.77 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 -7-7. F 51. X. V. MICHNA Lot 2, Block 3, Waverly Est. §2 100.0 L.F. Curb, gutter,pvmt. 5.88 588.00 252.0 S.F. Sidewalk .43 108.36 60.8 S.F. Driveway .85 51.68 7 .0 52. ELIZABETH M. HINMAN Lots 3 & 4, Block 3, Waverly Est. 200.0 L.F. b,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 1,176.00 600.0 S.F. Sidewalk .43 258.00 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 ,737. -OC PROJECT: Ocean Drjve TmnrovPmPnta - Unit L CONTRACTOR. HP1APnfa1a 'Rratharc .• 16 ITEM NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY ASSESSED DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED 53• WOODROW. L. MASSEY Lot 5, Block 3, Waverly Estate Unit 2 100.0 L.F. 258.0 S.F. 101.6 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk Driveway 5.88 .43 .85 588.00 110.94 86.36 785-30 54. ROY L. HOBBS Lot 1, Block 1, Waverly Estate Unit 1 100.0 L.F. 264.0 S.F. 50.8 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk Driveway 5.88 .43 .85 588.00 113.52 43.18 7 .70 55• LILLIAN MURRY COON Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Edgewater Terrace 200.0 L.F. 600.0 S.F. -0- Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk Driveway 5.88 .43 .85 1,176.00 258.00 0.00 3 .00 countT.y Club Drive Intersection 56. VAKY ESTATE Lot 1, Block 4, Edgewater TerracE 100.0 L.F. Curb,gatter,pvmt. 5.88 588.00 264.0 S.F. 50.8 S.F. Sidewalk Driveway .43 113.52' 43.18 744.70 ,.85 17 PROJECT: Ocean Drive Improvemets - Unit 4 CONTRACTOR: Heldenfels Brothers ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSEI 57• H. A. BIRKELBACH Lot 2, Block 4, Edgewater TerracE 100.0 L.F. 300.0 S.F. Carb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.g8 .43 88.00 129.00 -0- Driveway .85 -0- 717.00 58. L. C. COTHAM, JR. Lot 3, Block 4, Edgewater TerracE 100.0 L.F. b,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 588.00 264.0 S.F. Sidewalk .43 1.13.52 50.8 S.F. Driveway .85 43.18 7 .70 59• FRANCES M. EVANS Lot 4, Block 4, Edgewater Terrace 100.0 L.F. 249.0 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 588.00 107.07 63.3 S.F. Driveway .85 53.81 7 60. DENZIL M. ROBERTS Lot 5 & 6, Block 4, Edgewater Terrace 200.0 L.F. 555.0 S.F. b,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 1,176.00 238.65' 58.3 S.F. Driveway .85 49.55 1, 20 17 -A PROJECT: Ocean Drive Improvements - Unit 4- CONTRACTOR: 11eldenfels Brothers ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESS 61. A. P. PORTELA 200.0 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 1,176.00 Lot 7 & 8, Block 4, Edgewater 600.0 S.F. Sidewalk .43 258.00 Terrace -0- Driveway. .85 0.00 1, 73 .00 62. MRS. A. P. PORTELA, ET AL 100.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 588.00 Lot 9, Block 4, Edgewater 300.00 S.F. Sidewalk .43 129.00 Terrace -0- Driveway .85 0.00 --f!7-00 63. NORMAN RANSLEBEN 48 .18+74.00 = Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 660.97 Lot 10 & 11, Block 4, Edgewater 122.18 x 49.CD Terrace, By council action 2 -5 -6 +134.50 = 183.50/2 = ANg. 92% x 122.18 112.41 x 5.88 $66o.97.,- Sidewalk. .43 193.33 IP9.18 x 4 = 488.72S.F. x 92% = 449.62 .43 = $193.33 854.30 ALameda Street Entersection 64. 3AYMOND L. SMITH 179.0 L.F. Ct=b,gutter,pvmt. 17.15 3,069.85 Lots 1,& 2, Block 2, Edgewater -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 Terrace; Zoned other than R -1 or -0- Driveway .85 0.00 -2. Combined with 102 3,0 9. 5 End West Si e ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJECT: Ocean Drive Improvements - Unit IV CONTRACTOR: Heldenfels Brothers 18 f 66. LORINE ESHLEMAN V GT. A part of lot 4, section 1, F. B. E. F. & G. 1. 67. BENJAMIN ESHLEMAN JR. E. 102' of lot 4, F.B.E.F. & G.T., Section 1 C. C. BUTT Tract "B" out of F.B.E.F. & G.T. got 4, Sec. 1 212.87 L.F. -0- -0- 101.95 L.F. -0- 50.8 S.F. 203.20 L.F. -0- -0- Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk Driveway Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk Driveway Curb,gutt- ,pvmt• Sidewalk Driveway ,88 1,251.68 .43 0.00 .85 0.00 5. 8 599.47 4 0.00 8 43.18 5.88 1,194.821 4 0.00 85 0.00 1, ASSESSMENT RATES Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2 Curb, Gutter & Pavement p.l.f. = 5.88 Zoned or Used other than R -1 or R -2 C. G. & Pvmt. p.l.f. = 17.15 Plain Sidewalk p:s.f. = $3 Plain Driveway p.s.f. = Exp. $$ Ag. Driveway p.s.f.. = 9 Exp. Ag. Sidewalk p.s.f. = ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL, NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSED Ocean Drive Improveme is - Unit IV FroD1 Airline Road to eda Street BeeInning At Airl'ne Road East Side 65. BENJAMIN ESHLEMAN, JR. A tract of land co taining 77.0 L.F. Curb,gutter' pvmt. 5.88 452.76 3.1183 ac. out of t 3, Sec. 1 -0- Sidewalk .4 0.00 F. B. E. F. & G. . 60.8 S.F. Driveway .8 51.68 1 i 66. LORINE ESHLEMAN V GT. A part of lot 4, section 1, F. B. E. F. & G. 1. 67. BENJAMIN ESHLEMAN JR. E. 102' of lot 4, F.B.E.F. & G.T., Section 1 C. C. BUTT Tract "B" out of F.B.E.F. & G.T. got 4, Sec. 1 212.87 L.F. -0- -0- 101.95 L.F. -0- 50.8 S.F. 203.20 L.F. -0- -0- Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk Driveway Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk Driveway Curb,gutt- ,pvmt• Sidewalk Driveway ,88 1,251.68 .43 0.00 .85 0.00 5. 8 599.47 4 0.00 8 43.18 5.88 1,194.821 4 0.00 85 0.00 1, • PROJECT: Ocean T7rivP 7m=nvPmPnta - jJni CONTRACTOR: Heldenfels Brothers ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSEI 69. UNIVERSITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI part of lot 4, sec. 1, F. B. E. 131.33 L.F. Curb, gutter,pvmt. 5.88 77 .22 F. & G. T., as recorded in the -0- Sidewalk .43 .00 deed records Nueces Co., Texas., -0- Driveway .85 .00 vol. 692, Pages 84 -86. 772.22 Palora Street Inte section 70. GUY I. WARREN 526.0 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 3,09 .88 portion of Lot 1, Sec. 15, -0- Sidewalk .43 .00 F. B. E. F. & G. T. -0- Driveway .85 .00 ,092.8 71. BINFORD ARNEY Lot 16-B, Block 7, South Shores Estate. By Council Action 180.25 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 X1,05 .87 2 -5 -69. -0- Sidewalk .43 P.00 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 l,o5g.g 72. FRED W. HELDENFELS -- Lot 15 -$, Block 7, South Shores Estate. By Council Action 170.0 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 g 9.6o 2 -5 -69. -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 -0- I Driveway .85 0.00 PROJECT: Ocean Drive Tmprovements - TTnit CONTRACTOR: Heldenfels Brothers ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSE7 73. H. C. HELDENFELS ! Lot 14-B, Block 7, South Shores Estate . By council action 2 -5 -6 -210.0 L.F. Curb.gutter,pvmt. 5.88 1,234.$0 -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 4•90 74. H. G. TROMM Lot 11 Flamboyant Estate 60.18 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 353.86 -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 82.15 S.F. Driveway .85 69.83 23.99 75• IRA R. FISCHER, JR. Lot 21 Flamboyant Estate 6o.18 L.F. b,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 353.86 -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 90.0 S.F. Driveway .85 76.50 - 30. 76. SARA B. $AUGH Lot 3, Flamboyant Estate 60.18 L.F. b.gutter,pvmt. 5.88 353.86 -0- - Sidewalk .43 0.00 77.2 S.F. Driveway .85 65.62 19. 21• PROJECT: Ocean Drive Improvements - Unit IU CONTRACTOR: Heldenfels Brothers ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL, NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSEI 77. ROBERT LEE OTTO 1 Lot 4, Flamboyant Estate 60.10 L.F. -0- Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 353.39 0.00 101.8 S.F. Driveway .85 86.53 39.92 78. ODETTE DE PENA Lots 1 -2 & 3, Block 1 and 50' of unplatted Lot north. Ocean Driv addition. 250.87 L.F. -0- Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 1,475.12 0.00 75.8 S.F. Driveway .85 64.43 - ,5 .55 79• BURTON DUNN Lots 4, 5, & 6, Block 1, Ocean Drive Addition. 301.30 L.F. -0- L5ub,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 1,771.65' 0.00 * -0- Driveway .85 0.00 1,771. 80. MORRIS S. LICHTINSTEIN Lot 1, Block 2, Ocean Drive Addition. _ 100.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 588.00" -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 * -0- Driveway .85 0.00 59T. 0-0 *Credit Existing Driveway 22 PROJECT: Ocean Drive Improvements - Unit IV CONTRACTOR: Heldenfels Brothers ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSED 81. DAVID L. NENDLOWITZ Lot 2, Block 2, Ocean Drive' Addition 100.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 588.00 -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 85.8 S.F. Driveway .85 72.93 0.93 i 82• WAYNE JOHNSON Lot 3 and N. 3' of lot 4, Ocean Drive Addition 100.0 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 588.00 -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 63.3 S.F. Driveway .85 53.81 1. 1 83. ROBERT C. KIRMSE S. 97' Lot 4 and all Lot 5 Block 2, Ocean Drive Addition 200.0 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 1,176.00 -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 66.0 S.F. Driveway .85 56.10 ,232.10 lenmore Stree Intersection 84. ESTATE OF MATHILDE C. VAUGHN Lot 1, Block 1, Waverly Estate Unit 2 99.60 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 585.65 -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 70.5 S.F. Driveway .85 59.93 5.5 23 PROJECT: Ocean Drive Improvements - Unit IV CONTRACTOR: Heldenfels Brothers ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSEI 85. VICTOR G. VAUGHN, JR., TRUSTEE Lot 2, Block 1, Waverly Estate Unit 2 100.0 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 588.00" -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 5 .00 86. ROBERT C. KIRMSE Lot 3, and N. 56' Lot 4,Block 1 Waverly Estate #2 150.0 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 882.00 -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 2.00 87. CARLYLE B. SLABOUG% M.D. S. 50' Lot 4 and all Lot 5, Block 1, Waverly Estate #2 150.0 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 882.00 -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 * -0- Driveway .85 0.00 2.00 88. H. D. HUNSAKER Lots 6 -7 & 8, Block 1, Waverly Estate #2 Sop a - 200.0 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 t 7 r ¢.00 ,176,-00 -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 50.8 S.F. Driveway .85 43.18 -,218.1 1 ?07• r7 *Credit Existing Driveway 24 PROJECT: Ocean Drive Improvements - Unit IV CONTRACTOR: Heldenfels Brothers ' ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSEI 89. W. H. HAMMONDS Lot 9, Block 1, Waverly Estate #2 100.0 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 588.00 -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 * -0- Driveway .85 0.00 5 .00 90. M. H. APPEL Lot 10, Block 1, Waverly Estate #2 100.0 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 588.00' -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 599.0-0- 91. JOHN WINKLER, M.D. Lot 11, Block 1, Waverly Estate #2 100.0 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 588.00 -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 588-00 92. W. L. MAXWELL Lot 12, Block 1, Waverly Estate #2 100.0 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 588.00 -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 5 .00 - .;realL P--- TsLing Driveway 25 PROJECT: Ocean Drive Improvements - Unit IV_ CONTRACTOR: Heldenfels Brothers ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSEE 93. BOB J. SPANN Lot 13, Block 1, Waverly Estate #2 100.0 L.F. -0- Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 588.00 0.00 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 5ZT. 00 94. CHARLES KING Lot 1 and N. 50' Lot 2, Block 1 Edgewater Terrace 150.0 L.F. -0- Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 882.00 0.00 55.8 S.F. Driveway .85 47.43 929. 3 95. S. A. WILLIAMS S. 50' Lot 2 all Lot 3, Block 1 Edgewater Terrace 150.0 L.F. -0- Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 882.00 0.00 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 2.00 96. A. P. PORTELA, M. D. Lot 4 - N. 50' Lot 5, Block 1 Edgewater Terrace 150.0 L.F. -01 74.5 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk Driveway 5.88 .43 .85 882.00 0.00 63.33'' 975-.3-3 26 PROJECT: Ocean Drive Improvements - Unit IV CONTRACTOR: Heldenfels Brothers ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSE 97• cHAs. c. Burr S. 50' Lot 5, all Lot 6, Block 1 Edgewater Terrace 150.0 L.F. -0- Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 882.00 0.00 50.8 S.F. briveway .85 43.18 925.1 98. BERNARD P. DIETZ Lot 7 and N. 50' Lot$ Block 1 Edgewater Terrace 150.0 L.F. -0- Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 5.88 .43 882.00 0.00 107.2 S.F. Driveway .85 91.12 973.1 99• DR. SAM C. WOOLVIN S. 50' Lot 8 and N. 50' Lot 9, Block 1,'Edgewater Terrace 100.0 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 588.00 -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 65.0 S.F. Driveway .85 55.25' 3.21 . 100. JAMES R. BILL S. 50' Lot 9 and all Lots 10, - 11, 12, 13 & 14, Block 1, Edgewater Terrace; zoned other than R -1 or R -2. 50.0 L.F. 500.0 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5 88 17.15 294.00 8,575.00 -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 69. c PROJECT: Ocean Drive Improvements - Unit TV CONTRACTOR: Heldenfels Brothers ITEM NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY ASSESSED DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSE 101. O'MEARA & GALLAND Lots 15 & 16 and 42' Lot 17, Black 1, Edgewater, Terrace. Zoned other than R -1 or R -2. 242.0 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 17.15 4,150.30 -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 167.4 S.F. Driveway .85 142.30 ,2g2. End East side End Oceaz Drive ImprovE ments Unit IV Alain is Street Int rsection From South East R.O.W. Line of Ocean Drive to Approx. 0' South Fas erly on Alame a Street Be finning at Oce n Drive South East Side 102. RAYMOND R. SMITH Lots 1, 21 & 3, Block. 2, Edge- water Terrace. Zoned other than R -1 or R -2. 486 .42 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 17.15 8,342.10' -0- Sidewalk .43 0.00 1304.0 S.F. Driveway 2 -35' .85 1,108.40 _ ,450.5c PROJECT: Ocean Drive Improvements - Unit IV CONTRACTOR: geldenfels Brothers ITEM NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY ASSESSED DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSEI 103. WILLIE BEZDEK Lot 4, Block 2, Edgewater Terrace. R -1 zoned. 100.0 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5.88 588.00 -0- Sidewalk 43 0.00 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 59970-0 End Sou h East Side Alameda Street Alam da Street Int rsection from South East R.O.W. Line of Ocean DrivE to Approx. 420' c outheaste ly On Alameda St eet Be inning at OceEn Drive Northwest Side 104. SAMUEL FRECB Lot 7, Block 8, Edgewater Terrace , 25% rear assessment 17.25 L.F. Curb, gutter,pvmt. 5.88 50% side-assessment, by Council 69.0 S.F. Sidewalk .43 9,-67' Action set at total 196.65 -0- Driveway .85 0.00 196.65 End Northwest Side AlEmeda Street End Alameda Street Intersection End Project • SECTION 4. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED THAT IN THE EVENT THE ACTUAL FRONTAGE OF ANY PROPERTY HEREIN ASSESSED SHALL BE FOUND UPON THE COMPLETION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS TO BE GREATER OR LESS THAN THE NUMBER OF FEET HEREIN - ABOVE STATED, THE ASSESSMENTS HEREIN SET AGAINST ANY SUCH PROPERTY AND AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF SHALL BE, AND THE SAME ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE INCREASED OR DECREASED AS THE CASE MAY BED IN THE PROPORTION WHICH SAID EXCESS OR DEFICIENCY OR FRONTAGE SHALL BEAR TO THE WHOLE NUMBER OF FRONT FEET OF PROPERTY ACTUALLY IMPROVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FRONT FOOT RULE OR RATE OF ASSESSMENT HEREIN ADOPTED,IT BEING THE INTENTION THAT SUCH PARCEL OF PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF ABUTTING ON THE PORTION OF THE STREETS ABOVE DESCRIBED, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, SHALL PAY FOR SAID IMPROVEMENTS UNDER THE "FRONT FOOT RULE OR PLAN ", WHICH RULE OR PLAN IS HEREBY FOUND AND DETERMINED TO BE JUST AND EQUITABLE AND TO PRODUCE A SUBSTANTIAL EQUALITY HAVING IN VIEW THE SPECIAL BENEFITS TO BE RECEIVED AND THE BURDENS IMPOSED THEREBY; AND IT IS FURTHER ORDAINED THAT UPON FINAL COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SAID IM- PROVEMENTS ON SAID PORTION OF OCEAN DRIVES ALL CERTIFICATES HEREINAFTER PROVIDED FORS ISSUED TO EVIDENCE SAID ASSESSMENTS AGAINST SAID PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREETS AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF SHALL BE ISSUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, AND SHALL EVIDENCE THE ACTUAL FRONTAGE OF SAID PROPERTY AND THE ACTUAL COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS, THE AMOUNT NAMED IN SAID CERTIFICATE IN NO CASE TO EXCEED THE AMOUNT HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST SUCH PROPERTY UNLESS SUCH INCREASE BE CAUSED BY AN EXCESS OF FRONT FOOTAGE OVER THE AMOUNT HEREINABOVE STATED, SUCH ACTUAL COST AND SUCH ACTUAL NUMBER OF FRONT FEET, IF DIFFERENT FROM THE HEREINABOVE SHOWN IN SECTION 3 HEREOF TO BE DETERMINED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS UPON COMPLETION OF SAID WORK ON SAID STREETS AND THE FINDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SHALL BE FINAL AND BINDING UPON ALL PARTIES CONCERNED. SECTION 5. THAT THE SEVERAL SUMS MENTIONED ABOVE IN SECTION 3 HEREOF ASSESSED AGAINST SAID PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING ON THE PORTION -7- 0. . 0 OF OCEAN DRIVE, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, WHETHER NAMED OR OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN OR NOT, SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 4 THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH INTEREST THEREON AT THE RATE OF SIX AND ONE -HALF (6 -1/2 %) PER ANNUM WITH REASONABLE ATTORNEYS FEE AND ALL COSTS AND EXPENSES OF COLLECTIONS IF INCURRED1 ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE MADE A FIRST AND PRIOR LIEN UPON THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY, AGAINST WHICH SAME ARE ASSESSED FROM AND AFTER THE DATE SAID IMPROVEMENTS WERE ORDERED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, TO -WIT: DECEMBER 30, 1968, AND A PERSONAL LIABILITY AND CHARGE AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN, AND THAT SAID LIEN SHALL BE AND CONSTITUTE THE FIRST AND PRIOR ENFORCEABLE CLAIM AGAINST THE PROPERTY ASSESSED AND SHALL BE A FIRST AND PARAMOUNT LIEN SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER LIENS, CLAIMS OR TITLE, EXCEPT FOR LAWFUL AD VALOREM TAXES; AND THAT THE SAME SO ASSESSED SHALL BE PAID AND BECOME PAYABLE IN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS AT THE OPTION OF THE PROPERTY OWNER: 1. ALL IN CASH WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OR ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY; OR Z. TWENTY PERCENT (20 %) CASH WITHIN TWENTY DAYS AFTER THE COMPLETION OF SAID WORK AND ITS ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY AND 20% RESPECTIVELY ON OR BEFORE ONE YEAR, TWO YEARS THREE YEARS AND FOUR YEARS AFTER THE COMPLETION OF SAID WORK AND ITS ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY, WITH INTEREST FROM DAY OF SUCH COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY UNTIL PAID AT THE RATE OF 6 -1/2% PER ANNUM; OR 3. PAYMENTS TO BE MADE IN MAXIMUM OF 60 EQUAL INSTALLMENTS, THE FIRST OF WHICH SHALL BE PAID WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE COMPLETION OF SAID IMPROVEMENT, AND THE ACCEPTANCE THERE- OF BY THE CITY AND THE BALANCE TO BE PAID IN 59 EQUAL CONSECUTIVE MONTHLY INSTALLMENTS COMMENCING ON THE 1ST DAY OF THE NEXT SUCCEEDING MONTH AND CONTINUING THERE- AFTER ON THE 1ST DAY OF EACH SUCCEEDING MONTH UNTIL THE ENTIRE SUM IS PAID IN FULLS TOGETHER WITH INTEREST FROM THE DATE OF SAID COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY UNTIL PAID, AT THE RATE OF SIX AND ONE -HALF PERCENT (6 -1/2 %) PER ANNUM; PROVIDED1 HOWEVER THAT THE OWNERS OF SAID PROPERTY AVAILING THEMSELVES OF OPTION "2" OR ^3^ ABOVE SHALL HAVE THE PRIVILEGE OF PAYING ONES OR ALL, OF SUCH INSTALLMENTS AT ANY TIME BEFORE MATURITY THEREOF BY PAYING THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF PRINCIPAL DUE, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST ACCRUED TO THE DATE OF PAYMENT. SECTION 6. THAT FOR THE PURPOSE OF EVIDENCING SAID ASSESSMENTS, THE LIENS SECURING SAME AND THE SEVERAL SUMS ASSESSED AGAINST THE SAID PAR- CELS OF PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF AND THE TIME AND TERMS OF PAYMENTS AND TO AID IN THE ENFORCEMENT THEREOFI ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES SHALL BE ISSUED BY THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI] TEXAS, TO ITSELF UPON THE COMPLETION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS IN SAID STREET AND ACCEPTANCE THERE- OF BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, WHICH CERTIFICATES SHALL BE EXECUTED BY THE MAYOR IN THE NAME OF THE CITY ATTESTED BY THE CITY SECRETARY WITH THE CORPORATE SEAL OF SAID CITY] AND WHICH CERTIFICATES SHALL DECLARE THE AMOUNTS OF SAID ASSESSMENTS AND THE TIMES AND TERMS THEREOF THE RATE OF INTEREST THEREON THE DATE OF THE COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR WHICH THE CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED, AND SHALL CONTAIN THE NAMES OF THE APPARENT TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROP- ERTY ASSESSED BY LOT AND BLOCK NUMBERS OR FRONT FOOT THEREOF OR SUCH OTHER DESCRIPTION AS MAY OTHERWISE IDENTIFY THE SAME AND IF THE SAID PROP- ERTY SHALL BE OWNED BY AN ESTATE OR FIRM, THEN TO SO STATE THE FACT SHALL BE SUFFICIENT AND NO ERROR OR MISTAKE IN DESCRIBING SUCH PROPERTY OR IN GIVING THE NAME OF ANY OWNER OR OWNERS OR OTHERWISEX SHALL IN ANYWISE INVALIDATE OR IMPAIR THE ASSESSMENT LEVIED HEREBY OR THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED IN EVIDENCE THEREOF. THAT THE SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL FURTHER PROVIDE SUBSTANTIALLY THAT IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY INSTALLMENT OF PRINCIPAL OR INTEREST WHEN DUES THEN AT THE OPTION OF THE CITYS ITS SUCCESSORS, OR ASSIGNS, OR THE HOLDER THEREOF THE WHOLE OF SAID ASSESSMENT EVIDENCED THEREBY SHALL AT ONCE BECOME DUE AND PAYABLE AND SHALL BE COLLECTIBLE 0 • WITH REASONABLE ATTORNEYS FEES AND ALL EXPENSES AND COSTS OF COLLECTION, IF INCURRED, AND SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL SET FORTH AND EVIDENCE THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS OF SUCH PROPERTYp WHETHER NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED THEREIN OR NOT, AND THE LIEN UPON SUCH PROPERTY, AND THAT SAID LIEN IS FIRST AND PARAMOUNT THEREON, SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER LIENS TITLES AND CHARGES EXCEPT FOR LAWFUL AD VALOREM TAXES, FROM AND AFTER THE DATE SAID IMPROVEMENTS WERE ORDERED BY SAID CITY COUNCILS TO -WIT: DECEMBER 30, 1968, AND SHALL PROVIDE IN EFFECT THAT IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT THEREOF THE SAME MAY BE ENFORCED AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY OR THEIR SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS BY THE SALE OF THE PROPERTY THEREIN DESCRIBED IN THE MANNER PROVIDED FOR THE COLLECTION OF AD VALOREM TAXES AS ABOVE RECITED, OR BY SUIT IN ANY COURT HAVING JURISDICTION. THAT SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL FURTHER RECITE IN EFFECT THAT ALL THE PROCEEDINGS WITH REFERENCE TO MAKING SAID IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN REGU- LARLY HAD IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW AND CHARTER IN FORCE IN SAID CITY AND THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITYp AND THAT ALL PREREQUISITES TO THE FIXING OF THE ASSESSMENT LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY THEREIN DESCRIBED, OR ATTEMPTED TO BE DESCRIBEI)p AND THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, EVIDENCED BY SUCH CERTIFICATES, HAVE BEEN REGULARLY DONE AND PERFORMED WHICH RECITALS SHALL BE EVIDENCE OF ALL THE MATTERS AND FACTS SO RECITED AND NO FURTHER PROOF THEREOF SHALL BE REQUIRED IN ANY COURT. THAT SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL FURTHER PROVIDE IN EFFECT THAT THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTIp TEXAS SHALL EXERCISE ALL OF ITS LAWFUL POWERS IN THE ENFORCEMENT AND COLLECTION THEREOF3 AND SAID CERTIFICATES MAY CONTAIN OTHER AND FURTHER RECITALS, PERTINENT AND APPROPRIATE THERETO. IT SHALL NOT BE NECESSARY THAT SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL BE IN THE EXACT FORM AS ABOVE SET FORTH, BUT THE SUBSTANCE AND EFFECT THEREOF SHALL SUFFICE. SECTION 7. THAT ALL SUCH ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ARE A PERSONAL LIABILITY AND CHARGE AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBEDI OR ATTEMPTED TO BE DESCRIBED NOTWITHSTANDING SUCH OWNER OR OWNERS MAY NOT BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED AND ANY IRREGULARITY mo • • IN THE NAME OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS OR THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY PROPERTY OR THE AMOUNT OF ANY ASSESSMENT, OR IN ANY OTHER MATTER OR THING SHALL NOT IN ANYWISE INVALIDATE OR IMPAIR ANY ASSESSMENT LEVIED HEREBY OR ANY CERTIFICATE ISSUED, AND SUCH MISTAKES OR ERROR, INVALIDITY OR IRREGULARITY WHETHER IN SUCH ASSESSMENT OR IN THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED IN EVIDENCE THEREOF, MAY BE, BUT IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE, TO BE ENFORCEABLE AT ANY TIME COR- RECTED BY THE SAID CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI. FURTHER THAT THE OMISSION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS IN FRONT OF ANY PART OR PARCEL OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE AFOREMENTIONED STREETS WHICH IS EXEMPT FROM THE LIEN OF SAID ASSESSMENT, SHALL IN NO WISE AFFECT OR IMPAIR THE VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENTS AGAINST THE OTHER PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREET; AND THAT THE TOTAL AMOUNTS ASSESSED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREET WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFINED AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF ARE THE SAME ASS OR LESS THAN, THE ESTIMATE OF SAID ASSESSMENT PREPARED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL AND ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID CITY COUNCIL RELATIVE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS THEREOF, AND WITH THE TERMS, POWERS AND PROVISIONS OF SAID CHAPTER io6 OF THE ACTS OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE 40TH LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS KNOWN AS ARTICLE 11058 OF VERNON'S ANNOTATED CIVIL STATUTES OF TEXAS AND THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, UNDER WHICH TERMS POWERS AND PROVISIONS SAID PROCEEDINGS, SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS WERE HAD AND MADE BY SAID CITY COUNCIL. SECTION 8. THE FACT THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STREET HAS BECOME AN IMPORTANT THOROUGHFARE AND THE FACT THAT THE PRESENT CONDITION OF SAID STREET; WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, IS DANGEROUS TO THE HEALTH AND PUBLIC WELFARE OF THE INHABITANTS THEREOF CREATES A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND AN IMPERATIVE PUBLIC NECESSITY, REQUIRING THE SUSPENSION OF THE CHARTER RULE THAT NO ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE OF ITS INTRODUCTION, AND THAT SAID ORDINANCE SHALL BE READ AT THREE SEVERAL MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCILS AND THE MAYOR HAVING DECLARED cm • . 0 CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS c, DAY OF �7 -' l9G / TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE OF THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE, A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND IMPERATIVE NECESSITY EXIST FOR THE SUSPEN- SION OF THE CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT THAT NO ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED, AND THAT SUCH ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL; I, THEREFORE, REQUEST THAT YOU SUSPEND SAID CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT AND PASS THIS ORDI- NANCE FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED, OR AT THE PRESENT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL. RESPECTFULLY, 7TH THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS THE CHARTER RULE WAS SUSPENDED E FOLLOWING VOTE: JACK R. BLACKMON RONNIE SIZEMORE V. A. "DICK" BRADLEY, JR.� P. JIMENEZ, JR., M.D. GABE LOZANO, SR. KEN MCDANIEL W. J. "WRANGLER" ROBERTS THE ABOVE ORDINANCE WAS PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: JACK R. BLACKMON RONNIE SIZEMORE V. A. "DICK" BRADLEY, JR. P. JIMENEZ, JR., M.D. GABE LOZANO, SR. KEN MCDANIEL W. J. WRANGLER" ROBERTS