Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09344 ORD - 04/16/1969B,,W:3/31/69 v a c r r AN ORDINANCE CLOSING THE HEARING ON IMPROVEMENTS OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, FROM OSAGE TO PORT AVENUE; ON OSAGE STREET, FROM CHIPPEWA TO MORGAN AVENUE; SOUTHEAST CORNER, PORT AND MORGAN INTERSECTION; ON SIDEWALKS ON McMULLEN ROAD, FROM NAVIGATION BOULEVARD TO WEST OSO HIGH SCHOOL; ON NAVIGATION BOULEVARD, FROM MOLINA TO MCMULLEN ROAD; AND ON CLIFF MAUS DRIVE, FROM CULVER TO McMULLEN ROAD; AND FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PROPERTY ABUTTING SAID STREETS WILL BE SPECIFICALLY BENEFITED AND ENHANCED IN VALUE IN EXCESS OF COST OF IMPROVEMENTS, AND LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT; FIXING A CHARGE AND LIEN, THE MANNER AND TIME OF PAYMENT AND COLLECTION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, THE CITY COUNCIL OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, BY DULY ENACTED ORDINANCE PASSED AND APPROVED ON JANUARY 22, 1969, DETERMINED THE NECESSITY FOR, AND ORDERED THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED C I STREETS, IN THE MANNER AND ACCORDING TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS HERE- . � TOFORE APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL BY ORDINANCE DATED JANUARY 22, ig6g: 1. OSAGE STREET FROM CHIPPEWA TO MORGAN AVENUE; 2. HIGHLAND AVENUE FROM OSAGE STREET TO PORT AVENUE; • 3. SOUTHEAST CORNER, PORT AND MORGAN INTERSECTION; AND MISCELLANEOUS SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING STREETS, TO -WIT: 1. MCMULLEN ROAD FROM NAVIGATION BOULEVARD TO WEST OSO SCHOOL; 2. NAVIGATION BOULEVARD FROM MCMULLEN ROAD TO MOLINA; AND 3. CLIFF MAUS FROM CULVER TO MCMULLEN ROAD, .'4 A DULY EXECUTED NOTICE OF SAID ORDINANCE HAVING BEEN FILED IN THE NAME ` t {1 OF SAID CITY WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS; AND WHEREAS, SAID CIrY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, AFTER HAVING ADVERTISED FOR AND RECEIVED BIDS ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE LENGTH OF TIME AND IN THE MANNER AND FORM AS REQUIRED BY THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY AND THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, AND AFTER HAVING DULY AND REGULARLY MADE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR SUCH PURPOSE TO COVER THE ESTIMATED COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID CITY, ALL AS PROVIDED BY THE CORPUS CHRISTI CITY CHARTER AND BY LAW, DID AWARD A CON- TRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS TO KING CONSTRUCTION CO. ON THEIR LOWEST AND MOST ADVANTAGEOUS BID AND SAID CONTRACT HAS BEEN HERETO- FORE DULY EXECUTED BY SAID CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND KING CONSTRUCTION CO. AND 15 DATED , AND THE PERFORMANCE BOND REQUIRED BY SAID CONTRACT HAS BEEN PROPERLY FURNISHED BY SAID KING CONSTRUCTION CO. C335- r AND ACCEPTED BY THE SAID CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY AS TO FORM AND AMOUNT AS REQUIRED BY THE SAID CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY AS TO FORM AND AMOUNT AS REQUIRED BY THE CHARTER OF SAID C+TY AND THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS; AND WHEREAS, THE SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS CAUSED THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO PREPARE AND FILE ESTIMATES OF THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND ESTIMATES OF THE AMOUNT PER FRONT FOOT PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON A PORTION OF THE HEREINABOVE NAMED STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFINED, TO BE IMPROVED, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND SAID DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS HAS HERETOFORE FILED SAID ESTIMATES AND A STATEMENT OF OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO WITH SAID CITY COUNCIL, AND THE SAME HAS BEEN RECEIVED, EXAMINED AND APPROVED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL; AND WHEREAS, SAID CITY COUNCIL, BY DULY ENACTED ORDINANCE DATED JANUARY 29, 1969, DID DETERMINE,THE NECESSITY OF LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT FOR THAT PORTION OF THE COST OF CONSTRUCTING SAID IMPROVEMENTS ON THE ABOVE -NAMED STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFINED, TO BE PAID BY THE ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND BY ORDINANCE DATED JANUARY 29, 1969, DID SET AND ORDER A HEARING FOR FEBRUARY 26, 1969, AND BY ORDINANCE DATED FEBRUARY 26, 1969, DID RESET SAID HEARING FOR MARCH 19, 1969, TO BE HELD AT 3I00 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CITY HALL OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, FOR THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS ABOVE DEFINED, AND FOR ALL OTHERS OWNING OR CLAIMING ANY INTEREST IN, OR OTHERWISE INTERESTED IN SAID PROPERTY, OR ANY OF SAID MATTERS AS TO THE ASSESSMENTS AND AMOUNTS TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PARCEL OF ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AND AS TO THE SPECIAL BENEFITS TO ACCRUE TO SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY BY VIRTUE OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS, IF ANY, OR CONCERNING ANY ERROR, INVALIDITY, IRREGULARITY OR DEFICIENCY IN ANY PROCEEDINGS, OR CONTRACT, TO APPEAR AND BE HEARD IN PERSON OR BY COUNSEL AND OFFER EVIDENCE IN REFERENCE TO SAID MATTERS; AND THE CITY COUNCIL DID BY SAID ORDINANCE ORDER AND DIRECT THE CITY TO GIVE NOTICE OF SAID HEARING -9- TO THE OWNERS ABUTTING UPON SAID STREET AS SHOWN BY THE CURRENT AD VALOREM TAX ROLL BY MAILING SUCH NOTICE TO SUCH OWNERS AND PUBLISHING SAID NOTICE AT LEAST THREE TIMES IN THE CORPUS CHRISTI TIMES BEFORE THE DATE OF THE HEARING, SUCH NOTICE BY MAIL AND BY PUBLICATION BEING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 11056 OF VERNON'S ANNOTATED CIVIL STATUTES OF TEXAS; AND WHEREAS, SUCH NOTICE WAS GIVEN SAID OWNERS OF PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON THE CURRENT AD VALOREM TAX ROLL WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE STREET BEING IMPROVED BY MAILING SUCH NOTICE AT LEAST FOURTEEN (14) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO SUCH OWNERS AND BY PUBLISHING THREE TIMES NOTICE OF SUCH HEARING IN THE CORPUS CHRISTI TIMES, THE FIRST OF WHICH PUBLICATION WAS AT LEAST TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF SAID HEARING; BOTH FORMS OF NOTICE BEING IN COMPLIANCE WITH AND CONTAINING THE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY ARTICLE 110581 VERNON'S ANNOTATED CIVIL STATUTES; AND WHEREAS, AFTER DUE, REGULAR AND PROPER NOTICE THEREOF, ALL AS PROVIDED BY LAW AND THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, SAID HEARING OF WHICH NOTICE WAS GIVEN, WAS OPENED AND HELD ON MARCH 19, 1969, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER AT CITY HALL IN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID ORDINANCE AND NOTICE, AT WHICH TIME AN OPPORTUNITY WAS GIVEN TO ALL SAID ABOVE- MENTIONED PERSONS, FIRMS, CORPORATIONS AND ESTATES, THEIR AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS, TO BE HEARD AND TO OFFER EVIDENCE AS TO ALL MATTERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID ORDINANCE AND NOTICE, AT WHICH TIME THE FOLLOWING APPEARED AND OFFERED THE FOLLOWING TESTIMONY: -3- ` � f - -__ t _____. ___ -__ \ Following a brief recess, Mayor Pro Tern Sizemore reconvened the meeting and announced the scheduled public hearing on street assessments on Osage Street, from Chippewa to Highland Avenue; Highland Avenue, from Osage Street to Port Avenue; Port Avenue and Morgan Street Intersection; Sidewalk Improvements on McMullen Road, from Navigation Boulevard to West Oso School; Navigation Boulevard, from McMullen Road to Molina; and Cliff Maus from Culver to McMullen Road. Mayor Pro Tern Sizemore directed that it be noted that a quorum of the Council was present; that each member of the Council had been presented with a Preliminary Assessment Roll; and that Assistant City Attorney Tom McDowell would conduct the public hearing. t Minutes Regular Council Meeting March 19, 1969 Page 10 Mr:.MCDOwell expiained the purpose of the public hearing and stated the Staff would offer testimony from the City Engineer ond:.eveiluation testimony from a real estate appraiser to substantiate the assessments which appear on the Preliminary Assessment Roll, and that the hearing was to form a basis on which the Council, acting as a legislative body, would determine or establish the assessments on the abutting properties. He explained that abutting property owners would be allowed to present expert testimony and cross- examine the City's expert witness. Mr. James K. Lantos, First Assistant Director of Public Works, presented the plans and specifications for the street and sidewalk improvements and the Preliminary Assessment Roll; testified as to his qualifications and as to the nature, extent and specifications of the proposed improvements; stated that the cost of the total improvements was $169,902.61; total assessments to property owners was $73,054.51; and that the total amount of the City's portion was $96,848.10; explained the manner in which such pro rata share was computed; that this project was included in the Bonds voted in 1967; and that the assessment rates for this project have been calculated by using the unit prices taken from the low bid and applying these unit prices to the front footage of the abutting property in accordance with the assess- ment policy as shown on the Assessment Roll. Mr. J. H. Garcia, the City's expert witness, testified as to his background and experience which he felt qualified him as a real estate appraiser, his qualifications having been furnished the Council in writing. Mr. Garcia testified that he had personally viewed and understood the extent and specifications of the proposed improvements; that he had personally viewed within the past week the preliminary assessment roll and each of the properties to be assessed; and that in his opinion, each of the properties so assessed on the street improvement portion of the project, would be enhanced in value at least to the extent of the proposed assessments, but that in his opinion, the,only properties in the sidewalk portion of the project, which would be enhanced in value at least to the extend of the proposed assessments, are as follows: Item 074, Community Settlement Center Item 075, Antonio Alvarez, Lot 1, Block 1, Molina Addition 01 Item 076, Luis Olmos, Lot 1 -A, Block 1, Molina Addition 41 Item 080, St. Martins Episcopal Church Minutes Regular Council Meeting March 19, 1969 Page 11 Mr. Garcia described the foregoing properties as improved residential properties with pedestrian traffic, and that in his opinion, the properties would be enhanced in value in the amount of the assessment immediately after completion of the project, but that in his opinion, the remainder of the sidewalk portion of the Project would be enhanced in value in the amount of the assessment by virtue of the proposed improvements on anticipated values only, as these properties are unimproved and there is no need for sidewalks. City Manager Townsend stated that it is the opinion of the Staff, and always has been, that all property in the City has a need for sidewalks; that the construction of side- walks enhance properties at the time of completion of construction, and that the Staff would be prepared to have additional testimony on this point for the records. Mr. McDowell explained that there are large cultivated fields with some areas built up with small neighborhood businesses of retail stores etc., in the areas which Mr. Garcia stated would not be enhanced in value by virtue of construction of the pro- posed sidewalks, and asked Mr. Garcia if the likelihood that sidewalks will be needed in the future was reflected in his opinion that the properties would be enhanced on anti- cipated values only, as distinguished from the sidewalks areas which would be improved, and Mr. Garcia stated this was the basis on which he formed his opinion. Mayor Pro Tern Sizemore stated that each property owner present would be given an opportunity to direct questions to Mr. Lantos regarding specifications of the project, and to state his approval or objection to any of the proposed improvements or assessments to his property. The following persons appeared: Item 1179, Consolidated Investment Property - Mr. Louis Schmidt appeared and stated that the proposed construction of sidewalks on the West side of Cliff Maus Drive would create a disadvantage to elementary school children crossing Old Brownsville Road without advantage of a stop sign, and stated it appears the sidewalk is being placed on the wrong side of the street. He further stated that in some instances where the property is undeveloped, the sidewalk will have to be destroyed when it is improved and could not beconaideredmnenhancement at this time but would be an added expense to the property owner. He stated that the sidewalks in some areas would only serve as a dam to hold water and impede the already difficult drainage situation. • Minutes Regular Council Meeting March 19, 1969 Page 12 Mr. Lantos explained that from an engineering standpoint, it had not been determined feasible to construct the sidewalks on the East side of Cliff Maus; that it had been discussed with the School District officials, and it was determined that the traffic would be more dangerous to school children if the sidewalks were constructed on the East side. He stated that the construction of the sidewalks will be in such a manner so as not to obstruct drainage, and that if in the future the sidewalks will have to be removed the owners will be given credit. Item #81, Osage Oil Company - Mr. S. D. Roberts appeared on behalf of the subject property, and stated that he had donated land for right of way when Morgan Street was widened about twenty years ago, and paid for his share of the assessments. He explained that at that time he was told that as long as his oil pumps and island were not remodeled, he would not have to remove them, but that it appears now that these facilities will have to be moved, and if this is true, he might as well remove the entire operation. City Manager Townsend stated that the Minutes of the Assessment Hearing on Morgan Street Improvements would be checked relative to Mr. Roberts' donation of right of way. Mr. Roberts was advised that the island in the right of way will have to be removed. Item f1, Forid E. Mouse - Mr. Mousa stated he was in favor of the proposed improvements, but inquired if the drainage on Chippewa and Osage Streets would be improved, and was advised that the existing pavement would be removed and the street lowered. Item #73, W. L. Bates, Trustee - Mr. Bates stated he did not feel the construction of sidewalks on this property would be an enhancement to the value on the basis that they are not needed, and that he is opposed to the assessment. He stated he feels the construction of curbs and gutters will benefit the property. Mr. Bates pointed out on the map areas which he considered a better location for the sidewalks, stating they should be located where there is at least a potential need. Minutes Regular Council Meeting March 19, 1969 Page 13 Item 029, Sidney Forsman - Mr. Forsman stated he is opposed to the proposed sidewalks and the sidewalk assessments; stated there are existing sidewalks in the vicinity of the Junior High School, but that the students do not use them, but that he does not oppose the remainder of the proposed improvements. Item 032, Frank Medina - Mr. Medina stated his gas pumps are located very near the property line and inquired as to whether or not they would have to be removed; asked for a breakdown in costs of each street within the project, and stated he was not opposed to the improvements and assessments on Highland, that the residents want them and are anxious for the work to begin. Item f15, Alston Terry - Mr. Louis Garcia appeared and stated he is not opposed to the improvements, but stated that he had erected a hurricane fence on all sides of his house and asked if it will be moved as a result of the improvements. Mr. Garcia was advised that the fence would not be moved. Mr. Jonas.Solinas, speaking for the Board of Trustees of the West Oso School District, appeared and stated the School District endorsed the sidewalk construction as proposed by the City Engineering Staff; stated that the location of the sidewalks as pro- posed will make it safer and more convenient for the three to four hundred school students attending schools within the two -mile limit in the area, City Manager Townsend read a letter signed by Mr. James B. Sorenson relative to Item X78, which stated he was unequivocally opposed to the installation of sidewalks on the basis they are unnecessary at the present time since the major part of the acreage is under cultivation. No one else appeared to be heard in connection with the proposed street improve- ments. Motion by Roberts, seconded by McDaniel and passed, that the hearing be closed, and that the matter be given further consideration. There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned. THERE BEING NO FURTHER TESTIMONY OFFERED OR ANY FURTHER PARTIES APPEARING TO BE HEARD, UPON PROPER MOTION, DULY SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED, THE SAID HEARING WAS DECLARED CLOSED; AND WHEREAS, NO FURTHER PARTIES APPEARING AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY BEING OFFERED AS TO THE SPECIAL BENEFITS IN RELATION TO THE ENHANCED VALUE OF SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY AS COMPARED TO COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS OF SAID PORTION OF SAID STREET PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST SAID PROPERTY, OR AS TO ANY ERRORS, INVALIDITIES OR IRREGULARITIES, IN THE PROCEEDINGS OR CONTRACT HERETOFORE HAD IN REFERENCE TO THE PORTIONS OF'SAID STEEET TO BE IMPROVED; AND WHEREAS, SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS HEARD EVIDENCE AS TO THE SPECIAL BENEFITS AND ENHANCED VALUE TO ACCRUE TO SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AS COMPARED WITH THE COST OF MAKING SAID IMPROVEMENTS ON SAID STREET, WITHIN THE LIMITS ABOVE DEFINED, AND HAS HEARD ALL PARTIES APPEARING AND OFFERING TESTIMONY, TOGETHER WITH ALL PRO- . TESTS AND OBJECTIONS RELATIVE TO SUCH MATTERS AND AS TO ANY ERRORS, INVALIDI- TIES OR IRREGULARITIES IN ANY OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND CONTRACT FOR SAID IM- PROVEMENTS, AND HAS GIVEN A FULL AND FAIR HEARING TO ALL PARTIES MAKING OR DESIRING TO MAKE ANY SUCH PROTEST, OBJECTION OR OFFER TESTIMONY AND HAS FULLY EXAMINED AND CONSIDERED ALL EVIDENCE, MATTERS, OBJECTIONS AND PRO- TESTS OFFERED AND BASED UPON SAID EVIDENCE, TESTIMONY AND STATEMENTS, SAID CITY COUNCIL FINDS THAT EACH AND EVERY PARCEL OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE PORTION OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS TO BE IMPROVED AS HEREIN DEFINED, WILL BE ENHANCED IN VALUE AND SPECIALLY BENE- FITED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS UPON THE SAID STREET UPON WHICH SAID PROPERTY ABUTS, IN AN AMOUNT IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO BE, AND AS HEREINBELOW, ASSESSED AGAINST EACH AND EVERY SAID PARCEL OF ABUTTING PROPERTY, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND SAID CITY COUNCIL DID CONSIDER AND CORRECT ALL ERRORS, INVALIDITIES OR DEFICIENCIES CALLED TO ITS ATTENTION AND DID FIND THAT ALL PROCEEDINGS AND CONTRACTS WERE PROPER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY AND THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, UNDER WHICH THOSE PROCEEDINGS WERE BEING HAD AND THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID CITY COUNCIL HERETOFORE HAD WITH REFERENCE TO SUCH IMPROVEMENTS, AND IN ALL RESPECTS TO BE VALID AND REGULAR; AND SAID CITY COUNCIL DID FURTHER FIND UPON SAID EVIDENCE THAT THE ASSESSMENTS HEREINBELOW MADE AND THE CHARGES HEREBY DECLARED AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY ON SAID PORTION OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, ARE JUST AND EQUITABLE AND DID ADOPT THE RULE OF APPOR- TIONMENT SET OUT BELOW AND THE DIVISION OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN SAID ABUTTING PROPERTIES, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AS JUST AND EQUITABLE, AND AS PRODUCING SUBSTANTIAL EQUALITY CON- SIDERING THE BENEFITS TO BE RECEIVED AND THE BURDENS IMPOSED THEREBY, AND THAT ALL OBJECTIONS AND PROTESTS SHOULD BE OVERRULED AND DENIED EXCEPT THE CORRECTIONS AND CHANGES AS APPEAR ON THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL INCLUDED IN THIS ORDINANCE: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. THAT THERE BEING NO FURTHER PROTEST OR TESTIMONY FOR OR AGAINST SAID IMPROVEMENTS, SAID HEARING GRANTED TO THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF ABUTTING PROPERTY ON SAID STREET, WITHIN THE LIMITS ABOVE DEFINED, AND TO ALL PERSONS, FIRMS, CORPORATIONS AND ESTATES, OWNING OR CLAIMING SAME OR ANY INTEREST THEREIN, BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY CLOSED AND ALL PRO- TESTS AND OBJECTIONS, WHETHER SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED OR NOT, SHALL BE, AND THE SAME ARE HEREBY OVERRULED AND DENIED. SECTION Z. THAT SAID CITY COUNCIL HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES UPON THE EVIDENCE HEARD IN REFERENCE TO EACH AND EVERY PARCEL OR PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE STREETS HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, THAT THE SPECIAL BENEFITS IN THE ENHANCED VALUE TO ACCRUE TO SAID PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, BY VIRTUE OF THE CONSTRUC- TION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID PORTION OF SAID STREETS UPON WHICH SAID PROPERTY ABUTS, WILL BE IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVE- MENTS AS PROPOSED TO BE, AND AS HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PRO- PERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND FINDS THAT THE APPORTIONMENT OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS, AND THAT ALL ASSESSMENTS HEREINBELOW -5- MADE ARE JUST AND EQUITABLE AND PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL EQUALITY CONSIDERING THE BENEFITS RECEIVED AND THE BURDENS IMPOSED THEREBY, AND ARE IN ACCORD- ANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, AND THE CHARTER PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, AND THAT THE PROCEEDINGS AND CONTRACT HERETOFORE HAD WITH REFERENCE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ALL RESPECTS REGULAR, PROPER AND VALID, AND THAT ALL PREREQUISITES TO THE FIXING OF THE ASSESSMENT LIENS AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTIES, AS HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED AND THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, WHETHER NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN OR NOT, HAVE BEEN IN ALL THINGS REGULARLY HAD AND PERFORMED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW, CHARTER PROVISIONS AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE SAID CITY COUNCIL. SECTION 3. THAT IN PURSUANCE OF SAID ORDINANCES, DULY ENACTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, AUTHORIZING AND ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STREET,. WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, AND IN PURSUANCE OF SAID PROCEEDINGS HERETOFORE HAD AND ENACTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, IN REFERENCE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND BY VIRTUE OF THE POWERS VESTED IN SAID CITY WITH RESPECT TO SAID STREET IMPROVEMENTS BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS AND THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO CHAPTER 106 OF THE ACTS OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE 40TH LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, KNOWN AND SHOWN AS ARTICLE 11055 OF VERNON'S ANNOTATED CIVIL STATUTES OF TEXAS, AS AMENDED, THERE SHALL BE, AND IS HEREBY LEVIED, ASSESSED AND TAXED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID PORTION OF SAID STREETS, AND AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, WHETHER SUCH REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN OR NOT, THE SEVERAL SUMS OF MONEY HEREINBELOW MENTIONED AND ITEMIZED OPPOSITE THE DESCRIPTION OF THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF SAID PROPERTY, AND NUMBER OF FRONT FEET OF EACH AND THE SEVERAL AMOUNTS ASSESSED AGAINST SAME AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AND NAMES OF THE APPARENT OWNERS THEREOF, ALL AS CORRECTED AND ADJUSTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, BEING AS FOLLOWS, TO -WIT: -6- I. SffMT 1MEPRO17MENTS 1. Osage Street from Chippewa to Highland Avenue 2. Highland Avenue from Osage Street to Fort Avenue 3: Port Avenue and Morgan Street Intersection II . SIDE TALK. IATROVII+9E'17'.PS 1. McMullen Road from Navigation Boulevard to West Oso School 2. Navigation Boulevard from PdcMull.en Road to Molina 3. Cliff Maus from Culver to McMillen Road I. STREET DIPROVE!ENTS -This portion of the project consists of the construction of several streets in the following manner: A. The construction will consist generally of excavation to a depth and width to permit the laying of standard 6" curb and gutter sections and installation and paving as follows: 1. Osage Street - The base for this street %--11 consist of 6" of compacted subgrade, 9" of compacted caliche base, a prime coat, and 2" of Type "D" asphaltic concrete surface for the width of 37' measured from the back of curbs. f• 2. Highland Avenue - The base will consist of 6" of compacted subgrade, 9" 1 of compacted caliche base, a prime coat, and 2" of Type "D" asphaltic / concrete surface for the iridth of 45' measured from the back of curbs. 3. Port and Morgan Intersection - line Zrork on this section consists of the channelization of the intersection by constructing a median to provide left turn moven,ancs and also the reconstruction of curbs e,nd driveways at the northeast corner and the transition of the existing pavement. along Port Avenue from Brannan to Sep est. Also to be constructed along wii;h the street improvements on the above streets are reinforced concrete sidevalks; 5' wide where tied to the back of the curb and 4' -ride where next to the praperty line, and 4 thick. Concrete drive-gays are also proposed as required by property ownerts -requests, and also storm sewers as needed to drain the streets. II. SID •TALK IMPROVE *01fTS -7ais portion of the project on Cli.Tf Maus Drive, McMullen Road, and Favigation Boulevard consists of the construction of 4' wide, 4" thick concrete sirle;ralks along one side of the street with the necessary pipe crossings at street inter6actions to provide access, and with some shell portions where inpracti- cal to construct concrete. III. Assecsnient rates for the above projee have been calcula,t-d by usin_, the unlit prices ts'ren from th^ lo,,Tli and applyint these u'tU prices to the front *cc,tage of the abut;'in €; prop sty in accordance with the asse:.a,c_nt policy as follows: Osage Street, property zoned �.nd used R -.1 cr r -? Pavement, crab and gutter wy�tid p.t.f,4.S3 Propzrty zoned or used other then R -1 or R Pav- ,ient, curb and gutty n Highland Avenue, property zoned and used R -1 or R -2 Curb, gutter and pavement @ Property zoned or used other than R -1 or R -2 0 Curb, gutter and pavement @ $9,5.9 Port- Morgan Intersection, regardless of zoning or use Curb and gutter only @ $2.5g p.1.f, All streets: Sidewalks @ $0.47 p.s.f. Driveways @ $0.91 p.s.f. Miscellaneous sidewalks calculated on a linear foot basis of $1.88 p.l.f. Total Contract Price $169,902.61 --,** ,69, _J' 02.6/ Total Assessments 99, E)5 5r 60,966.16 Total City's Portion ,� i ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJECT: Osage Street from Chippewa to Highland Avenue CONTRACTOR: King Construction Company ASSESSMENT RATES Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2 Curb Gutter & Pavement p.l.f. _ $ Zoned or Used other than R -1 or R -2 C. G. & Pvmt. l.f. _ $ Sidewalk t p.s.f. _ $ Driveway S. f. _ $ ITEM NO. OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY ASSESSED DESCRIPTION OF TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSEi Osa e Street from Chippewa to Highland Ave., Beginni g at Chippewa St. West Si e 1. FARID E. MOUSA N. 50' of Lot 6, Block 23 Meadow Park Addition 16Jed mTNie TN9N Q./ e.Q -.2 *46.50 L.F. 156.00 S.F. 82.20 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 10' Driveway -g .47 .91 0 73.32 74.80 5e922 . 411-79 2. 0. T. REYE5 S. 50' Lot 6, Block 23 Meadow Park Addition 50.00 L.F. 160.00 S.F. 82.20 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 10' Driveway 4-S3 5-.88• .47 .91 226. 50 294. a p 75.26 74. .B0 37�. So 3. DTATIVIDAD PALACIOS N. 50' Lot 5, Block 23 Meadow Park Addition 50.00 L.F. 160.00 S.F. 82.20 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 10' Driveway 4.53 - 5-.88- .47 .91 2P6.Sn Pqh-ee -75.20 74.84 376. s9 4. S. M. C01•Z11'a" TRUSTEE S. 50' Lot 5, Block 23 50.00 L.E. 160.00 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidcualk 4,553 -5. 96 - .47 p2G So 291i. -69 75.25 Meado -,r Park: Addition 82.20 S.F. 10' Driveway .91 74.80 376.5 D 2 PROJECT: Osage Street from Chip-pewa to Highland Avenue CONTRACTOR: King Construction Company ITEM I OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESS! 5. IJORA ALVAREZ 50.00 L.F. Curb ,gutter,pvmt. 4.53 fA3 zZ . so" 294. ea N. 50' Lot 4, Block 23 160.00 S.F. Sidewalk .47 75.20 Meadow Park Addition 82.20 S.F. 10' Driveway .91 74.80 3U.so 6. ANTONIO ABARCA 50.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 5 -�8& 8• � S. 50' Lot 4, Block 23 160.00 S.F. Sidewalk .47 75.20 Meadow Park Addition 82.20 S.F. 10' Driveway .91 74.80 396. so' T. REYNALDO T�RELES ' 50.00 L.F. Cu-rb,gutter,pvmt. 4.53 rj:$8- 22 .So 294:e6 N. 50' Lot 3, Block 23' 160.00 S.F. Sidewalk .47 75.20 Meadow Park Additinn 82.20 S.F. 10' Driveway .91 74.86 376.so 8. F. GARZA 50:00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 4.53 5.98 226. So 294.66 S. 50' Lot 3, Block 23 160.00 S.F. Sidewalk .47 75.20 Meadow Park Addition_ 82.20 S.F. 10' Driveway .91 74.80 376. sp PROJECT: Osage Street from Chippewa to Highland Avenue CONTRACTOR: King Construction Company ITEM NO. I OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY .ASSESSED DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT RAZE AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSi 9• NICOLAS RUIZ N. 50' Lot 2, Block 23 Meadow Park Addition 50.00 L.F. 160,00 S.F. 78.60 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk z 20' Driveway ,47 .91 '224.S-0 75,20 71.52 3 y3.z z' 10. TEODORIO IRIGOiEfd ET AL S• 50' Lot 2, Block 23 Meadow Park Addition 50.00 L.F. 160.00 S.F. 78.60 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk z 20' Driveway 4.53 �5 ,47 91 2zG. so ^:,^G. 75,2b 71,52 373. z2' 11. 0. H. & EDNA. WILLIAMS N. 50' Lot 1, Block 23 Meadow Park Addition 50.00 L.F. 160.00 S.F. 82.20 S.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 10' Driveway f� .47 .91 22 291�.GG 75.20 74.80 3'sL. So 12. C. C. SPEED, ET AL S. 50' Lot 1, Block.23 Meadow Park Addition 50.00 L.F. 160.00 S.F. 82.20 Sd'-. F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 01dc;ral_k 10' Driveway 4• ss - 5 -.88- .47 .91 2 so 75.20 74.80 -3 -74. 5'c • PROJECT: Osage Street from Chivnevra to Highland Avenue CONTRACTOR: King Construction ITEM I OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESS: NAVAJO STREET INIMRSECTION 13. ALONZO M. GONZALES 50.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 4.53 5-.8& 2 50 N. 50' Lot B, Block 24 160.00 S.F. Sidewalk ,47 75,20 Meadow Park Addition 82.20 S.F. 10' Driveway .91 74.86--�T,� • 376.sc 14. NICK BROUN 50.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 4• S 3 �:$$- 29 So 50' Lot 5 -A, Block 24 160.00 S.F. Sidewalk .47 75.20 Meador' Park Addition 82.20 S.F. 10' Driveway .91 74.86 �76.So 15. ALSTON TERRY 50.0 L.F. Curb, gutter , pvmt. 4'a 4Y99- 226.So nn 50' Lot 4 -B, Block 24 160,00 S.F. Sidewalk .47 75,20 Meadow Park Addition 82.20 S.F. 10' Driveway .91 74,86 .1 74. S-b 16. JOSEFA htALDONADO 50.00 L.F. LF Curb,�ttter,pvmt, S3 5.99 226. So 294.ee S. 50' Lot 4 -A, Block 24 160.00 S.F. Sidewalk .47 75,20 Meadow Park Addition 82.20 S.F. 10' Driveway .91 711,80 376•.5: PROJECT: Osage Street from Chippewa to Highland Aveneu CONTRACTOR: King Construction Company ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL 90. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESST 17. JOE NAVARRO 50.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. N. 50' Lot 3, Block 24 160.00 S.F. Sidewalk .47 75.20 Meadow Park Addition 82.20 S.F. 10 Driveway .91 74.80 376. so 18. FAIRFS P. WADE 50.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. ¢.5'3 §�- �Sa z29r486 S. 50' Lot 3, Block 24 160.00 S.F. Sidewalk .47 75.20 Meadow Park Addition 82.20 S.F. 10' Driveway .91 74.80 376. so - 19. JOE KLOESEL 50.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 4.53 5%& -P, so N. 50' Lot 2, Block 24 160.00 S.F. Sidewalk .47 75.20 Meadow Park Addition 82.20 S.F. 10' Driveway • .91 79'.80 �T6.S0 20. WALLACE STEWART 50.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. ¢.53 -5:8 226,5o e94.ee S. 50' Lot 2, Block 24 160.00 S.F. Sidevalk .47 75.26 Meadow Park Addition 82.20 S.F. 10' Driveway .91 74.86 .376, so PROJECT: Osage Street from Chippewa to Highland Avenue CONTRACTOR: King Construction Company ITEM NO. I OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY ASSESSED DESCRIPTION OF TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESS! 21. PERRY G. MELTON Lot 1, Block 24, Meadota Park ddition, B -4 Zone. 134.17 L.F. 416.68 S.F. 232.20 S.F. Curb, gutter, pvmt. Sidewalk Driveway - 30' S 6% �.$� .47 .91 9.60. 74 ^_3 _ X _5? - 195 33 211.30' Dorgan Avenue Intersection West Side Os ge Street Osage Street, Beginning from Chippewa at Ch' Street to Morgan - ewa Street Avenue EAST S . 22. C, C. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRIC Ella Barnes School Site *5' Wide 44 3.70 L.F. ••2,218.50 S.F. -0- urb,gutter,pvmt. idewalk Driveway 4.5 3 -5�$ .47 .91 i- 6a8.96 2;663 -j5 1,042.65 0.00 3,osz.� Hi 'tland Avenue Intersection 23• uliNERTH G. LIPIDELAtdD of A of the Lindeland Subd. k5' wide; B -4 zoned. 55.06 L.F. '275.30 S.F. -0- 'urb,gutter,pvmt. sidewalk Drivevay .47 .91 129.39 0.00 44/.59 a Avonao I1teY0ectlon Fn) List ;i 1 0- -.-Lre V En, of 0 }; • , 7 PROJECT: Osage Street from Chinpewa to Highland Avenue CONTRACTOR: King Construction Company ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSE Highland Av nue, from Osage Street to Port t enue eginning at Osage Street South ide 24. BENEATH G. LJNDELAND, ET TX x'339.77 L.F. Curb,gutte-r,pvmt. 7.i9 9�G 2,442.95, 3,�C5 -8Fr 751.45 Lot A, Lindeland Subd. *B -4 1,598.85 S.F Sidewalk .47 Zoned. 'l %20S.r^ X -101 Driveway .91 1/0.29 3,Z64./S 25• .C. G. - MENDIOLA *31.70 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt.�4 9. 19 227 92 *B -4 zoned. 158.50 S.F. Sidewalk .47 74.49 -0- Driveway .91 0.00 3cZ 4.1 26. �9 359.50 EUGENE COFFEY *50.00 L.F. Curb 9 9.47 B -4 zoned.* 200.00 S.F. Siderallcter,pvmt. 94.od (7.20 S.F. 10' Driveway .91 70.25. SZ1 0S- - 7, i9 637.54 27• ANTONIO OLIvk - 88.67 L.F. Curb,gutter,pnnt. -9 29 94:5. -7r Lot 1, Block 1, Rosewood Addn. 358.37 S.F- ideualk 47 168.4? 'includes return on Rose wood -0- Drivoway .91 0.00 zoned 8as.96 PROJECT: Osage Street from Chin-pewa to Hiehland Avanue CONTRACTOR: King Construction Company IT,w I OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESS! Rosewood Intersection 28• WALLACE E. STEWART *188.19 L.F. Curb,gutter ;pvmt. y 53 �8 g52.So i,ie6.5 rj Lot 1, Block 1, J. B. Wood Subd. —430.76 S.F. Sidewalk .47 202.45 *includes return on Rosewood 112.20 S.F. 15' Driveway .91 102.10 *- *credit for existing sidewalk 29• SIDNEY FORSM4Pi 496.3 8 L.F Curb,gutter,pvmt. 4. $3 $8 2,2418.60 2,918 ' 883,37 Forsman Tract 1,879.52 S.F Sidewalk .47 77.20 S . F • 10' Driveway . 91 70.2 5 _ • � 2a2.2i E pinosa Street Intersection 30 MRS. oNOFRE ABARCA 110.95 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 7/7 9.28 7.77 73 ^ ^^ _ ,143.23 Lot 1, Block A, La Bahia Addn. 304.75 S.F. Sidewalk .47 B -1 zoned. *includes return on -C- Driveway .91 0.00 Espinosa Street. - _ 94a 46, • PROJECT: Osage Street from Chippewa to Highland Avenue CONTRACTOR: King Construction Company ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL N0. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSE 31. JOE C. SALI11AS 69.95 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvnt, 7 19 9728 5o2.9�f Lot 2, Block A, La Bahia Addn. 254.75 S.F: Sidewalk .47 e 119.73: B -1 zoned. 77.20 S.F. 10' Driveway .91 70.25 69a.9a 32. %HANK MEDINA *120.95 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. $.29 -1 12-19:9�h- Lot 3 and 4, Block A, La Bahia 414.75 S.F. Sidewalk •47 ,1- 194,93' Addn. B -1 zoned. *Includes 217.20 S.F. 30' Driveway .91 197.65• return on Sabines Street S biras Street Intersection 33• E. G. SALI4ON 67.54 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt, 9�7 2¢2.69 31@� Lot 1 Block 1 5, Montrose Pars *(33,77)S,F; .47 50.51 50% assessed. *Includes return 50% 214.95 .91 0.00 on Buford and Sabinas Street 107.47 S.F.✓ Sidevalk B -1 zoned. -0- Driveway 293.32 34. LPHONSO BONILLA,S Lots 2 and 3, Eloek 5, Montrose Park Addition. 56.89N assessed B -1 zoned. 71.01 L.F. 7,/9 29o.d8 (40.40)L,Fi 'urb,r V er,p-�,nt. 9729 ��o= 201.99 S.F. 'idew,tlk .47 94.9; -0- Dr1vcir,,y .91 0.00 385,¢/ to PROJECT: naave Rtrefl from chippfP a in Nighl nA At m�a CONTRACTOR. X 33g ITEM ER OWN & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION N0. 35• RIGENIA DE LA PAZ Lot 4, Block 5. Montrose Park Addition. 701 assessed. B-1 zoned. 36•, sALvADOR T . SALAS Lots 5 & 6, 7 & 8, Block 5. Montrose Park Addition.B -1 zone 88.78% of 124.00 = 100.00% of 9.0 = QUANTITY I DESCRIPTION ASSESSED OF ASSESSMENT 31.01 L.F. (21.70)L.Ft� Curb, gutter,pvmt 73.54 S.F. Sidewalk . 77.20 S.F. •10' Driveway (110.09) 9.00 L.F. (550 4)s 77.20 S.F. Ourb,gutter,pvmt. Curb,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk Driveway 719 20 TOTAL -9 7.19 -9:22 64.7/- '' �0 AMOUNT RATE AMOUNT ASSESS: 17 19 9� 156.02 dlas.iz 341 5� •91 70.25 z60, 93 719 20 -9 7.19 -9:22 64.7/- '' �0 •47 258.6i •91 70.25 dlas.iz 11 PROJECT: Osage Street from Chippewa to Highland Avenue CONTRACTOR: King Construction Company ITEM I OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESORIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOK ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSE V rbena Street Intersection 39• JOE D. BROWNING X108.74 L.F. Curb ,gutter,pvmt. 7 /9 -9_,L 79/.94 1, G99. 49 A -2 zoned. *Includes return on 320.65 S.F. Sidewalk .47 150.70 Verbena Street. N. 44.28' of 77.20 S.F. 10' Driveway .91 70.25 Lot 2 & W. 70' of Lot 3, Block 4 1,221.3-, /,00.-.7 17 Montrose Park. 40. FRANCISCO SA1 INAS 9.28 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 7-1q 64.7Z4 X37 Block 4, S. 60 of Lot 2. -0- Sidewalk 99..29 47 0.00 Montrose Park Addition, *Return -0- Driveway .91 0.00 on Verbena Street. A -2 zoned. ' 66.72 41. MARTIN M. MEDINA 59.6o L.F. x• Curb,gutte,pvmt. - 9� 4 4 Block 4, M. 47.33` Lot 3 298.00 S.F. Sidewalk .47 140.06" Montrose Park Addition, A -2 -0- Driveway .91 0.00 zoned. -- 5G8. S8 42. ADELINE T. GARCIA -31.01 L.F. Curb , gutter,pvmt. 7 /9 -r2g p22.29 ��j Block 4, W. 25'of E. 50' of Lot 105.05 S.F. Sidewalk .47 49;37' Montrose Park Addition, A -2 77.20 S.F. 10' Drivt!%,ay .91 2 70.5 zoned. 34a•ss 12 PROJECT: Osage Street from Chippewa to Highland Avenue CONTRACTOR: King Construction Company 44. RICHARD A BLUCHER Pt. Lot 5 all Lot 4, Block 4 Montrose Park Addition. A -2 Zoned. 45. ESTATE OF LAURFklCE L. LARCADE Lot 5, Block 3, Montrose Park Addition. 1 -2 zoned. *Includes return on Hibiscus Street. A'�C_r. for existing sidewalk. 46. 242.09 L.F. Curb,gurter,pvmt. 880.40 S.F. Sidewalk 77.20 S.F. 10' Driveway biscus .Street Intersection *133.09 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 58.70 S.F. Sidewalk 77.20 S.F. 10' Driveway D. W. GRANT, JR. 146.0 L.F. Curb tter,pvmt. Lot 6 Block o ' , 3, Montrose Park Addition. 50 assessed. 1 -2 'y /16 i S.F,_ y dezraly zoned. TCrrdit for existing sidew�7?;. 29J loo S.F. riv crcy_ 2_20' 7. /9 �$ .47 .91 7.-/9 .91 7 /9 '4:$0 47 •91 413.78' 70.25 2224.66 �9 27.58,' 70.25 i,, / OJ¢.75 67 /ai.o s 2G7,ga 893. g� ITEM I OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL N0. ASSESSED OF AMOUPI ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESS 43. MYRTLE 0I.9hN Block �+ E. 25' of Lot 3. 31.01 L.F. 105.05 7• /9 -fig 2g� 285.29 Montrose Park Addition. A -2 S.F. 77.20 S.F. idewautter,pvmt. Sidewalk 10' Driveway •47 49.37 _ zoned. •91 70. �5 • 3Q2, Sg 44. RICHARD A BLUCHER Pt. Lot 5 all Lot 4, Block 4 Montrose Park Addition. A -2 Zoned. 45. ESTATE OF LAURFklCE L. LARCADE Lot 5, Block 3, Montrose Park Addition. 1 -2 zoned. *Includes return on Hibiscus Street. A'�C_r. for existing sidewalk. 46. 242.09 L.F. Curb,gurter,pvmt. 880.40 S.F. Sidewalk 77.20 S.F. 10' Driveway biscus .Street Intersection *133.09 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 58.70 S.F. Sidewalk 77.20 S.F. 10' Driveway D. W. GRANT, JR. 146.0 L.F. Curb tter,pvmt. Lot 6 Block o ' , 3, Montrose Park Addition. 50 assessed. 1 -2 'y /16 i S.F,_ y dezraly zoned. TCrrdit for existing sidew�7?;. 29J loo S.F. riv crcy_ 2_20' 7. /9 �$ .47 .91 7.-/9 .91 7 /9 '4:$0 47 •91 413.78' 70.25 2224.66 �9 27.58,' 70.25 i,, / OJ¢.75 67 /ai.o s 2G7,ga 893. g� 14 pROJECT• Osage Street from Chippewa to Highland Avenue CONTRACTOR: King Construction Company IM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL N0. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSE 47. JOS. SIKORA 39.38 L.F. Curb ,gutter,pvmt. s 56 Lots 8 and 9, Block 3, Montrose 46.90 S.F. Sidewalk 47 22.04 Park Addition. 1 -2 zoned. 217.20 S.F. 30' Driveway ,91 197.65 S02.93 48. GEO. J. bERRIMAN 177,21 L.F. Pavement only. --- e8 •¢%0.23 ,}-254 -6 157-58' Lot 7, Block 3 Montrose Park (92.93) •47 Addition. 52.b'- assessed.(dq%oa) 761,05 S.F. Sidewalk •91 165.80 1 -2 zoned. 182.20 S.F. 25' Driveway P0 2t Avenue Intersection 8 23.x) En South Side H ghland Ave. Highl nd Avenue, from Osage Street to Port Avenue Beginni g at Osage Streot North fide 49• C.C. INDEPMMME T SCHOOL DISTRICT 396.0 L.F. Curb,gutter,pv,nt. 5..88 /,743. $8 i c�v 0.00 Ella Barnes School Site. -0- idel•ralk .IF7 439.8 S.F. 2 -29' Driveway .91 400.21 -, . . Fra cesca Street tersection 50. PEDRO CHAVARRIA of 11, Bloc . 9, Koaar Addition . F . 95 L.F. (04.7 2) :w i . ,„ utter ,p v nt. 3 ' eo' 2 8 69.35% aosessed• -0- lidewalk L. -4y - .47 - ?8°.33 -.1� 0.00 77.20 S.F. U rive -.ray 10' .91 70.25 ., • PROJECT- Osage Street from'Chippewa to Highland Avenue CONTRACTOR: King Construction Company 14 Fri I OWDIER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL NO. ASSESSED OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSE 51. . P. REDDICK, ET AL Lot 50% 114.39LF Curb,gutter,pvmt. S/A 1, Block 9, Kosar Addition (57,20} 50% assessed on 114.39'. *Retur, 100%* 14.40' Curb ;gutter,.pvmt. G on Dolores Street -0- Sidewalk 47 0.00 77.20 S.F. Driveway 10' •91 70.00 394. Go 52. WM. REDDICK, ET AL *45-00 L.F. 2oz- Lot 2, Block 9, Kosar Addition - Sidewautter,pvmt. Sidewalk *Return on Dolores Street 77.20 S.F. 10' Driveway ,91 70.00 Do ores Street I•tersection 53— FELIPE SALOMAN 55.65 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 4.53 5.88 2 Lot 9 -A, Block 1, Kosar Addition (46,37) - 83.3Y• R -1 zoned. -0- Sidewalk -0- Driveway .47 .91 0.00 0.00 2 /O.OS 54. E. G. SOLOMON (34.69)L.P." Lot 9 -B, Block 1, Kosar Addition 55.65 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 7/9 -9.28 249.42 B -1 zoned. 62.35% assessed. -0- Sidewalk .47 0.00 _ 112_20 S.F_,_ 151 Driveway ,91 102.10 js�. Sp • 15 PROJECT: Osage Street from Chippewa to Highland Avenue CONTRACTOR: King Construction Company ITEM I OFMER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION -0- Driveway TOTAL N0. X15.08 L.F. ASSESSED OF Sidewalk -0- AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSE 55. RAUL E. SOLIZ **111.30 L.F Curb ,gutter,pvmt. 9•�9 9 gg qao. /a' Lot 1, Block 1, Kosar Addition (55.65) 5±±-98 B -1 zoned. 56.26 % assessed. 25.57 L.F Curb,gutter,pvmt. *104 return on Duncan. 77.20 S.F 10' Driveway .91 70.25 Gs¢ zz 56. 57. GAMO VERA Lot 2, Block 1, Kosar Addition. *Return on Duncan Street. B -1 zoned. FRANCESCA S. MEDLU Lots 21- A,22- A,23- A,24 -A & 25 -A, Block 6, Montrose Park Addn. *Includes return on Duncan St. B -1 zoned. 58. roH. Go�mEz t 26, Block 6, Montrose Park ddition. A -2 zoned. 31.50 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. -0- Sidewalk -0- Driveway :an Street ntersection X15.08 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. -0- Sidewalk -0- Driveway 0.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 0- Sidewalk 7.20 S.F. 10' Driveway 719 9 2Q •47 .91 289.809 0.00 0.00 719 2, 24S' 4j .47 0.00 .91 0.00 2 2G5. q3 7/9 92 .91 3 0.00. 7 427 7S' PROJECT: Osage Street from Chippewa to Highland Avenue CONTRACTOR: King Construction Company ITEM F OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION NO. ASSESSED OF ASSESSMENT 59• JOHN ESPARZA 50.00 L.F. Curb ,gutter ,p 27, Block 6, Montrose Park -0- �al ,P mot. Sidewalk Addition. A -2 zoned. 77.20 S.F. 10' Driveway 60. SUS D. CORTEZ Lot 28, Block 6, Montrose Park Addition. A -2 zoned. 61. 1DOMING0 VALDEZ Lot 29, Block 6, Montrose Park Addition. A -2 zoned. 62. C. L. VAN CUBA Lot 30, Block 6, Montrose Park Addition. A -2 zoned. 63• IERNESTO BRIO?M Lot 31, Block 6, Montrose Park Addition A -2 zoned. 50.00 L.F. ICurb,gutter,pvmt. -0- Sidewalk 77.20 S.F. 10' Driveway 50.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. -0- Sidewalk 77.20 S.F. 1101 Driveway 50.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. -0- Sidewalk 77.20 S.F. 10' Driveway 50.0 L.F. Curb, gutter,pvmt. -0- °idewalk 77.20 S.F. 10' Driveway 0 - 16 7./9 9.2G .47 .91 7/9 .47 .91 1/1, 9�a .47 .91 7/9 -9 4e .91 �s9.so - FE8:98 0.00 70.25 4Z9. 75- 359. �o 70.25 4z -7.�rs 3 � 0.00 70.25 4r�7s So 0.00 70.25 4277S- TOTAL AMOUNT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSE 0.s 0 •47 0.00 •91 70.25 429.75 7./9 9.2G .47 .91 7/9 .47 .91 1/1, 9�a .47 .91 7/9 -9 4e .91 �s9.so - FE8:98 0.00 70.25 4Z9. 75- 359. �o 70.25 4z -7.�rs 3 � 0.00 70.25 4r�7s So 0.00 70.25 4277S- • —. - - 17 PROJECT: Osage Street from Chippewa to Highland Avenue CONTRACTOR:King Construction Company ITEM I OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION NO. ASSESSED OF TOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT _ ASSESumIENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSF 64. CANDELARIO A. LOPEZ 50.00 L.F. Curb 7./9 9-.2g 30..5a Lot 32, Block 6, Montrose Park Addition. -0- ,gutter,pvmt. Sidewalk 47 A -2 zoned. 77.20 S.F. Driveway 10 0.00 .91 70.25 429.75 65• EVELYN OLIPHANT 50.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 719 19 351� 00 Lot 33, Block 6, Montrose Park -0- Sidewalk Addition. A -2 zoned, 12.20 S.F. 15' Driveway .47 .91 0.00 102:10 60 66. J. E. HERmFA,ET AL Lot 34, Block 6, Montrose 50.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. 17219 �a@� Park Addition. A -2 zoned. -0- Sidewalk .47 0.00 112.20 S.F. 15' Driveway •91 102.10 • 4E /•6a 07• RAY HARGETT Lot 35, Block 6, Montrose 50.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. % j9 4,.24 359,50 469. -96 Park Addition. A -2 zoned. -0- Sidewalk .47 0.00 — 77.20 S.F. 10' Driveway .91 70.25 _ 4V 75- • EAYMOPd GONi.nrFS Lot 36, Block 6, 500-00 L.F. Cidewaltter,pvmt. 7IF }29 59:50 Montrose Park. Addition . A -2 zoned._ 77,20 S.F. idevalk 10' Driveway .47 0.00 — -- - - - - - -- •91 70.25 4475* PROJECT: Osage Street from Chippewa to Highland Avenue CONTRACTOR: King Construction Company II I OWREP & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION N0. 69. EDMONM R. BARRERA Lot 37, Block 6, Montrose Park Addition. A -2 zoned. 70. ZOBEIDA M. B RRFUA Lot 38, Block 6, Montrose Park Addition. *Credit for existing improvements. A -2 zoned. • 18 QUANTITY DESCRIPTION ASSESSED OF TOTAL ASSESSMENT ATE AMOUNT AMOUNT ASSESSE 50.00 L.F. Curb,gutter,pvmt. ' -0- 71.20 S.F. Sidewalk 47 10' Driveway 0.00 91 70.25 425.7s 50.00 L.F. -0- -0- 71. JRICHUD P. CHURCH X57.0 L.F. Lots 39, 40, 41 & 42, Block 6. -0- Montrose Park Addition. 1 -2 zoned. *Credit for existing -0 curb, gutter and sidewalk. Pavement only Sidewalk Driveway vement only dewalk iveway ort Avenge Intersection North Side Highland Avenue End Highlan Avenue S.n6 -� . 47 .91 5. oG .91 t:0000 o� 90000 egg-de PROJECT: ._.Osage Street from Chippewa to Hi land Ave CONTRACTOR: King Construction Company ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION NO. ASSESSED OF TOTAL ASSESSMENT AMOUNT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSE: Misce- laneous Sidetr lk Project McMullen Rc d, from West so High School to 1111711a ion Blvd. Nor h Side Only Beginning at E. P/L of west C o High School Tra 72. J. R. XCXE 1,331.81 Sidewalk Lot 5, Block 61 Russell Farm 1.88 2,503.80' Blocks Partition 73° 74. 75• "av� ation Blvd. I tersection Ett McMullen Road Project Navigation lvd. -from McN lien Road to Moli Drive West ide Only Beg ing at Me. len Road W. L. BATES, TRUSTEE Lot 27 thru 41, Block 1 986.46 Sidewalk Midt0Vn Industrial District Old Browns ville Road Int arsectior. /- NF /GN.LiOR „loop l- ENTE(25 OF. G.. C, 469.51 Sidewalk ANTONIO ALUAREZ Lot 1, Block 1, Molina Addn. 120.0 Lb Sidewalk X2,503• c 1 °88 1,854J4 1,854.54 1.88 882.67' 1.88 225.6o- ' 20 PROJECT: Os ge Street from Chinpewa +n zr;gh � n CONTRACTOR, King Const ctinn mOM oanv ITEM OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION N0. ASSESSED TOTAL OF AMOUNT ASSESSMENT RATE AMOUNT ASSESSE 76• LUIS OIMOS Lot 1 -A, Block 1, Molina 50.0 L.F. Sidewalk 1.88 94.00 Addition #1 77. 78. 79• 1 �1 Molina Drive Inte section d Navigation vd. Cliff M a Drive from b c l Ilen Road to Culti_r Drive West ide Only Begi ing at McMall Road RAY PETERSON 1,301.60 IF Sidewalk Lots 3, 4, & 5 Midtown Industri 1 District ELIZABETH SORENSON, ET AL 1,193.72 L. .Sidewalk Lot 8, Gugenheim and Cohn -Farm Tracts Old Br .msville Road Intersection CONSOLIDATED IlVESTMENT.PROPER 779.26 L. .Si.dewalk Lot 9, Gugenheim and Cohn Farm Tracts ST. MARTINS EPIS. CHURCH 300 ft. out of lot 9, Gugenheim 300.0 L.F. Sidewalk and Cohn Farm Tracts Cliff DIaus rive End MisJI ,d .laneous Sider*,lk Project 1.88 2,447.o0 1.88 2,244.19' 2,2 .1 1.88 1,465.o0 1�0 1.88 564.o0 ASSESSMENT' ROLL 21 PROJECT: Osa a Street from Chi ewa to highland Avenue CONTRACTOR: Ring Construction Zoned & U Company ASSESSMENT RATES ed R -1 or R -2 Curb Gutter &Pavement n.l.f. Zoned or Used other than R -1 or R -2 C. G. & Pvmt, L w Sidealk i Driveway s.f. .s,f. _ ITEM N0. & QUANTITY i OWNER PROPERTY DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION 81. 82. ASSESSED OF ASSESSMENT RATE OSAGE OIL COMPANY Por - Morgan Int4r ection 113.00 l,f. Lot 15 -A, Block 1, Roosevelt Curb & gutter o y $2,53 Place S/W overlay .47 452.80 Driveway .91 (1 -20', 1 -25 ) End of Port - Morgan I tersectioii ESTATE OF MORRIS Po t Avenue (Eas Side) Lots 11, 12 and 13, BlockR' 2, SR 566.0 l.f. Curb & gutter o S/W q $2.53 Roosevelt Place -0- D/W .47 *Includes return on Segrest St •91 I End Port Ave East Side TOTAL AMOUNT AMOUNT' ASSESSM $285.89 -0- 412.04 $697,93 $404.80 266.02 -0- $670.82 SECTION 4. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED THAT IN THE EVENT THE ACTUAL FRONTAGE OF ANY PROPERTY HEREIN ASSESSED SHALL BE FOUND UPON THE COMPLETION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS TO BE GREATER OR LESS THAN THE NUMBER OF FEET HEREIN - ABOVE STATED, THE ASSESSMENTS HEREIN SET AGAINST ANY SUCH PROPERTY AND AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, SHALL BE, AND THE SAME ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE INCREASED OR DECREASED AS THE CASE MAY BED IN THE PROPORTION WHICH SAID EXCESS OR DEFICIENCY OR FRONTAGE SHALL BEAR TO THE WHOLE NUMBER OF FRONT FEET OF PROPERTY ACTUALLY IMPROVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FRONT FOOT RULE OR RATE OF ASSESSMENT HEREIN ADOPTED IT BEING THE INTENTION THAT SUCH PARCEL OF PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF ABUTTING ON THE PORTION OF THE STREETS ABOVE DESCRIBED, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED SHALL PAY FOR SAID IMPROVEMENTS UNDER THE "FRONT FOOT RULE OR PLAN', WHICH RULE OR PLAN IS HEREBY FOUND AND DETERMINED TO BE JUST AND EQUITABLE AND TO PRODUCE A SUBSTANTIAL EQUALITY, HAVING IN VIEW THE SPECIAL BENEFITS TO BE RECEIVED AND THE BURDENS IMPOSED THEREBY; AND IT IS FURTHER ORDAINED THAT UPON FINAL COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SAID IMPROVE- MENTS ON SAID PORTION OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED STREETS, ALL CERTIFICATES HEREINAFTER PROVIDED FOR, ISSUED TO EVIDENCE SAID ASSESSMENTS AGAINST SAID PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREET, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF SHALL BE ISSUED IN ACCORDANCE WITHI AND SHALL EVIDENCE THE ACTUAL FRONTAGE OF SAID PROPERTY AND THE ACTUAL COST OF SAID IMPROVE- MENTS, THE AMOUNT NAMED IN SAID CERTIFICATE IN NO CASE TO EXCEED THE AMOUNT HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST SUCH PROPERTY UNLESS SUCH INCREASE BE CAUSED BY AN EXCESS OF FRONT FOOTAGE OVER THE AMOUNT HEREINABOVE STATED, SUCH ACTUAL COST AND SUCH ACTUAL NUMBER OF FRONT FEET, IF DIFFERENT FROM THE HEREIN - ABOVE SHOWN IN SECTION 3 HEREOF] TO BE DETERMINED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS UPON COMPLETION OF SAID WORK ON SAID STREET, AND THE FINDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SHALL BE FINAL AND BINDING UPON ALL PARTIES CONCERNED. SECTION 5, THAT THE SEVERAL SUMS MENTIONED ABOVE IN SECTION 3 HEREOF ASSESSED AGAINST SAID PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING ON THE PORTION OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED STREETS WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED AND THE -7- U - I REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOFy WHETHER NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN OR NOT, SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 4 THEREOF TOGETHER WITH INTEREST THEREON AT THE RATE OF SIX AND ONE -HALF PERCENT (6 -i/2 %) PER ANNUM WITH REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEE AND ALL COSTS AND EXPENSES OF COLLECTION, IF INCURRED, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE MADE A FIRST AND PRIOR LIEN UPON THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY, AGAINST WHICH SAME ARE ASSESSED FROM AND AFTER THE DATE SAID IMPROVEMENTS WERE ORDERED BY SAID CITY COUNCILl TO -WIT: JANUARY 29, 19691 AND A PERSONAL LIABILITY AND CHARGE AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN,. EREIN AND THAT SAID LIEN SHALL BE AND CONSTITUTE THE FIRST AND PRIOR ENFORCEABLE CLAIM AGAINST THE PROPERTY ASSESSED AND SHALL BE A FIRST AND PARAMOUNT LIEN SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER LIENS] CLAIMS OR TITLE, EXCEPT FOR LAWFUL AD VALOREM TAXES; AND THAT THE SAME SO ASSESSED SHALL BE PAID AND BECOME PAYABLE IN ONE OF THE FOLLOW- ING METHODS AT THE OPTION OF THE PROPERTY OWNER: 1. ALL IN CASH WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OR ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY; OR 2. TWENTY PERCENT (20%) CASH WITHIN TWENTY DAYS AFTER THE COMPLETION OF SAID WORK AND ITS ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY, AND 20°n RESPECTIVELY ON OR BEFORE ONE YEAR, TWO YEARS, THREE YEARS AND FOUR YEARS AFTER THE COMPLETION OF SAID WORK AND ITS ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY WITH INTEREST FROM DAY OF SUCH COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY UNTIL PAID AT THE RATE OF 6 -1/2% PER ANNUM; OR 3. PAYMENTS TO BE MADE IN MAXIMUM OF 60 EQUAL INSTALLMENTS THE FIRST OF WHICH SHALL BE PAID WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE COMPLETION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND THE ACCEPTANCE THERE- OF BY THE CITY, AND THE BALANCE TO BE PAID IN 59 EQUAL CONSECUTIVE 14ONTHLY INSTALLMENTS COMMENCING ON THE 1ST DAY OF THE NEXT SUCCEEDING MONTH AND CONTINUING THERE- AFTER ON THE 7ST DAY OF EACH SUCCEEDING MONTH UNTIL THE ENTIRE SUM I$ PAID IN FULL, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST In • FROM THE DATE OF SAID COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE BY THE /CITY} UNTIL PAID, AT THE RATE OF SIX AND ONE —HALF PERCENT (6 -t /2 %) PER ANNUM PROVIDED HOWEVER, THAT_THE OWNERS OF SAID PROPERTY AVAILING THEMSELVES OF OPTION n.211 OR "311 ABOVE SHALL HAVE THE PRIVILEGE OF PAYING ONE, OR ALL, OF SUCH INSTALLMENTS AT ANY TIME BEFORE MATURITY THEREOF BY PAYING THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF PRINCIPAL DUE, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST ACCRUED, TO THE DATE OF PAYMENT. SECTION 6. THAT FOR THE PURPOSE OF EVIDENCING SAID ASSESSMENTS, THE LIENS SECURING SAME AND THE SEVERAL SUMS ASSESSED AGAINST THE SAID PAR- CELS OF PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF AND THE TIME AND TERMS OF PAYMENT, AND TO AID IN THE ENFORCEMENT THEREOF, ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES SHALL BE ISSUED BY THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, TO ITSELF UPON THE COMPLETION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS IN SAID STREET AND ACCEPTANCE THERE- OF BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, WHICH CERTIFICATES SHALL BE EXECUTED BY THE MAYOR IN THE NAME OF THE CITY ATTESTED BY THE CITY SECRETARY WITH THE CORPORATE SEAL OF SAID CITY, AND WHICH CERTIFICATES SHALL DECLARE THE AMOUNTS OF SAID ASSESSMENTS AND THE TIMES AND TERMS THEREOF, THE RATE OF INTEREST THEREON THE DATE OF THE COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR WHICH THE CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED, AND SHALL CONTAIN THE NAMES OF THE APPARENT TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE AND THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROP- ERTY ASSESSED BY LOT AND BLOCK NUMBER, OR FRONT FOOT THEREOF OR SUCH OTHER DESCRIPTION AS MAY OTHERWISE IDENTIFY THE SAME AND IF THE SAID PROP- , ERTY SHALL BE OWNED BY AN ESTATE OR FIRM, THEN TO SO STATE THE FACT SHALL BE SUFFICIENT AND NO ERROR OR MISTAKE IN DESCRIBING SUCH PROPERTY OR IN GIVING THE NAME OF ANY OWNER OR OWNERS OR OTHERWISE, SHALL IN ANYWISE INVALIDATE OR IMPAIR THE ASSESSMENT LEVIED HEREBY OR THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED IN EVIDENCE THEREOF. THAT THE SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL FURTHER PROVIDE SUBSTANTIALLY THAT IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY INSTALLMENT OF PRINCIPAL OR INTEREST WHEN DUE, THEN AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY ITS SUCCESSORS, OR ASSIGNS, OR THE HOLDER THEREOF, THE WHOLE OF SAID ASSESSMENT EVIDENCED THEREBY SHALL AT ONCE BECOME DUE AND PAYABLE, AND SHALL BE COLLECTIBLE -9- • WITH REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES AND ALL EXPENSES AND COSTS OF COLLECTION, IF INCURRED, AND SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL SET FORTH AND EVIDENCE THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER -OR OWNERS OF SUCH PROPERTY, WHETHER NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED THEREIN OR NOT, AND THE LIEN UPON SUCH PROPERTY, AND THAT SAID LIEN IS FIRST AND PARAMOUNT THEREON, SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER LIENS, TITLES AND CHARGES, EXCEPT FOR LAWFUL AD VALOREM TAXES, FROM AND AFTER THE DATE SAID IMPROVEMENTS WERE ORDERED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, TO -WIT: JANUARY 22, 19b9, AND SHALL PROVIDE IN EFFECT THAT IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT THEREOF, THE SAME MAY BE ENFORCED, AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY, OR THEIR SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, BY THE SALE OF THE PROPERTY THEREIN DESCRIBED IN THE MANNER PROVIDED FOR THE COLLECTION OF AD VALOREM TAXES AS ABOVE RECITED, OR BY SUIT IN ANY COURT HAVING JURISDICTION. THAT SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL FURTHER RECITE IN EFFECT THAT ALL THE PROCEEDINGS WITH REFERENCE TO MAKING SAID IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN REGU- LARLY HAD IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW AND CHARTER IN FORCE IN SAID CITY AND THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY, AND THAT ALL PREREQUI- SITES TO THE FIXING OF THE ASSESSMENT LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY THEREIN DESCRIBED, OR ATTEMPTED TO BE DESCRIBED, AND THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, EVIDENCED BY SUCH CERTIFICATES, HAVE BEEN REGULARLY DONE AND PERFORMED, WHICH RECITALS SHALL BE EVIDENCE OF ALL THE MATTERS AND FACTS SO RECITED AND NO FURTHER PROOF THEREOF SHALL BE REQUIRED IN ANY COURT. THAT SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL FURTHER PROVIDE IN EFFECT THAT THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, SHALL EXERCISE ALL OF ITS LAWFUL POWERS, IN THE ENFORCEMENT AND COLLECTION THEREOF, AND SAID CERTIFICATES MAY CON- TAIN OTHER AND FURTHER RECITALS, PERTINENT AND APPROPRIATE THERETO. IT SHALL NOT BE NECESSARY THAT SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL BE IN THE EXACT FORM AS ABOVE SET FORTH, BUT THE SUBSTANCE AND EFFECT THEREOF SHALL SUFFICE. SECTION 7, THAT ALL SUCH ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ARE A PERSONAL LIABILITY AND CHARGE AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED, OR ATTEMPTED TO BE DESCRIBED, NOTWITHSTANDING SUCH OWNER OR OWNERS MAY NOT BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED, AND ANY IRREGULARITY 50 IN THE NAME OF THE PROFERTY OWNER, OR THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY PROPERTY OR THE AMOUNT OF ANY ASSESSMENT, OR IN ANY OTHER MATTER OR THING SHALL NOT IN ANYWISE INVALIDATE OR IMPAIR ANY ASSESSMENT LEVIED HEREBY OR ANY CERTIFI- CATE ISSUED, AND SUCH MISTAKE, OR ERROR, INVALIDITY OR IRREGULARITY WHETHER IN SUCH ASSESSMENT OR IN THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED IN EVIDENCE THEREOF, MAY BE, BUT IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE, TO BE ENFORCEABLE, AT ANY TIME CORRECTED BY THE SAID CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI. FURTHER THAT THE OMISSION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS IN FRONT OF ANY PART OR PARCEL OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE AFOREMENTIONED STREETS, WHICH IS EXEMPT FROM THE LIEN OF SAID ASSESSMENT, SHALL IN NO WISE AFFECT OR IMPAIR THE VALIDITY OR ASSESSMENTS AGAINST THE OTHER PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREET; AND THAT THE TOTAL AMOUNTS ASSESSED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PRO- PERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREET WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFINED AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, ARE THE SAME AS, OR LESS THAN, THE ESTIMATE OF SAID ASSESSMENT PREPARED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL AND ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID CITY COUNCIL RELATIVE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSESS- MENTS THEREOF, AND WITH THE TERMS, POWERS AND PROVISIONS OF SAID CHAPTER 106 OF THE ACTS OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE 40TH LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, KNOWN AS ARTICLE 11058 OF VERNON'S ANNOTATED CIVIL STATUTES OF TEXAS AND THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, UNDER WHICH TERMS, POWERS AND PROVISIONS SAID PROCEEDINGS, SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSESS- MENTS WERE HAD AND MADE BY SAID CITY COUNCIL. SECTION 8. THE FACT THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STREETS HAVE BECOME AN IMPORTANT THOROUGHFARE AND THE FACT THAT THE PRESENT CONDITION OF SAID STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, ARE DANGEROUS TO THE HEALTH AND PUBLIC WELFARE OF THE INHABITANTS THEREOF CREATES A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND AN IMPERA- TIVE PUBLIC NECESSITY, REQUIRING THE SUSPENSION OF THE CHARTER RULE THAT NO ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE OF ITS INTRO- DUCTION, AND THAT SAID ORDINANCE SHALL BE READ AT THREE SEVERAL MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THE M4YOR HAVING DECLARED THAT SUCH EMERGENCY AND 5m NECESSITY EXISTS, AND HAVING REQUESTED THAT SAID CHARTER RULE BE SUSPENDED, AND THAT THIS ORDINANCE BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE OF ITS INTRODUCTION AND TAKE EFFECT AND BE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT FROM AND AFTER ITS PASSAGE, IT IS ACCORDINGLY SO ORDAINED, THIS THE /� DAY OF r s 1969. ATTEST: 1`7 CIT SEC ETARY APPROVED: DAY OF 7�,,.(� , t 969; CITY ATTORNEY a MAYOR ple•iem THE CITY OF CORPUS ISTI, TEXAS TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS a CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DAY OF r, l9._.j` FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE OF THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE, A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND IMPERATIVE NECESSITY EXIST FOR THE SUSPEN- SION OF THE CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT THAT NO ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUC °D, AND THAT SUCH ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE MEETINGS OF IPE CITY COUNCIL; I, THEREFORE, REQUEST THAT YOU SUSPEND SAID CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT AND PASS THIS ORDI- NANCE FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED, OR AT THE -RESENT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL. RESPECTFULLY, MAYOR TAO OF C CHRISTI, TEXAS THE CHARTER RULE WAS SUSPENDED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: JACK R. BLACKMON RONNIE SIZEMORE V. A. "DICK" BRADLEY, JR. P. JIMENEZ, JR., M.D. GABE LOZANO, SR. KEN MCDANIEL W. J. "WRANGLER" ROBERTS THE ABOVE ORDINANCE WAS PASSED BY THE FOLLOW G VOTE: JACK R. BLACKMON RONNIE SIZEMORE V. A. "DICK" BRADLEY, JR. P. JIMENEZ, J M.D. GA GABE LOZANO, SR. KEN MCDANIEL W. J. "WRANGLER" ROBERTS -