Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes City Council - 08/14/1984MINUTES CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 14, 1984 2:00 P.M. Present: Mayor Luther Jones **Mayor Pro Tem Betty N. Turner Council Members: Welder Brown Leo Guerrero *Dr. Charles W. Kennedy, Jr. Joe McComb Frank Mendez Mary Pat Slavik Absent: David Berlanga, Sr. City Manager Edward A. Martin City Attorney J. Bruce Aycock City Secretary Bill G. Read Mayor Luther Jones called the meeting to order in the Council Chamber of City Hall. The invocation was given by Mrs. Patty Mueller in the absence of the invited minister, following which the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States was led by Mayor Jones' grandson, Luther G. Jones, IV, who was visiting from Bethesda, Maryland. City Secretary Bill G. Read called the roll of required Charter Officers and verified that the necessary quorum was present to conduct a legally constituted meeting. Mayor Jones administered the Oath to Mrs. Ticia Hanisch, a new appointee to the Food Services Advisory Council. Mayor Jones called for consideration of appointments to Boards and Commissions and briefly reviewed the appointees discussed during the morning Workshop meeting. A motion was made by Council Member Mendez that the following appointments be confirmed, seconded by Council Member Slavik and passed unanimously: a. Cable Communications Commission Term: Norberto Viamonte (local government) 7/87 Katherine Conoly (education) 7/85 Mary Wyatt (community -at -large) reappointment 7/87 Mrs. F.H. Uhlenhaker (community -at -large) 7/86 MICROFILMED inutes Regular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 2 b. Planning Commission Ricardo Elizondo, Jr. (reappointment) 7/31/87 Lucy McCracken (reappointment) 7/31/87 Arnoldo Moreno 7/31/87 c. Solicitations Commission Yolanda Pantoja 7/10/87 Jessie Lopez (reappointment) 7/10/87 Tomasa Vasquez 7/10/87 d. Sister City Committee Martha Espinosa 5/87 Mrs. Chris Adler 5/87 e. Human Relations Commission Betty Jean Longoria 6/14/85 Michael Quillin (Youth) 6/14/85 Michelle Villarreal (Youth) 6/14/85 f. Airport Board Robert Welch (reappointment) 4/4/87 Jerry Kane 4/4/87 Mayor Jones then called for action of the Council from the Workshop Session on the following items: 1. Approving a motion which would terminate any further in lieu of payments from the gas and water funds into the General Fund. 2. Approving a motion that General Fund revenue short fall from the in lieu of payment for 1984-85 be compensated for by cutting general fund expenditure items with no tax rate increase. A motion was made by Council Member Guerrero that the foregoing items be confirmed, seconded by Council Member Brown. Item 1 passed unanimously by those present and voting; item 2 approved by a majority vote with Council Member McComb voting "no". *Council Member Charles Kennedy arrived at the meeting at 2:19 p.m. Mayor Jones called for consideration of the resolution on water supply sources. A motion was made by Council Member McComb that the resolution be adopted, seconded by Council Member Brown and passed unanimously. The following resolution was passed: ]inutes Regular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 18402 EXPRESSING THE COUNCIL'S SUPPORT OF EXPENDITURES TOWARDS ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY SOURCES. The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing resolution passed by the following vote: Jones, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, McComb, Mendez, and Slavik voting "aye"; Turner and Berlanga absent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mayor Jones announced the bid opening on the following Engineering projects: 1. Cleaning Horne Road and Water Street Sanitary Sewer Lines. This project provides for the removal of sedimentation and sludge within the approximate three miles of 18 -inch, 21 -inch, and 24 -inch diameter trunk sewer in the Horne Road and Water Street sewer trunk lines. Council Member Slavik inquired of Mr. Lontos if the staff could perform this cleaning operation rather than contracting with an outside individual. Assistant City Manager James K. Lontos explained that the City does not yet have the type of equipment to perform this type of task. City Manager Martin further explained that the lines to be cleaned are major ones which would require a great deal of time. He explained that the City does plan to purchase a clean-up machine for this purpose later in the year. Mr. Lontos then opened bids on this project from the following firms: Channel Construction Co., Naylor Industries, Shur -Flo Company, dba Slipliners, and L & H Construction Company. Mr. Lontos informed the Council that the required bid security bonds had been submitted with all of the bids and the bidders had acknowledged receipt of the addendum. 2. Central Public Library. The two story library is proposed to be constructed on the block bounded by Comanche Street, North Tancahua Street, Carrizo Street and Blucher Park. Project design provides for the necessary structural and utility considerations for the addition of a future third floor on the library building. Mr. Lontos explained to the Council that there are five alternates included in this project, but the total base bid is the figure that will be read during the opening of the bids. He stated that all of the alternates are additive alternates which will be included in the project if funds are available. Assistant City Manager Lontos opened bids on this project from the following companies: Beck & Son, Inc.; Braselton Construction Co.; CJB Construction, Inc.; Tellepsen and Goldston Corporation, Joint Venture; Haley Corporation of Texas; W. J. Hessert Construction Co.; Marshall Co. General Contractors; Salazar Construction Co.; and SONS/ET Construction Co. Mr. Lontos informed the Council that the required bid security bonds had been submitted with all of the bids, but noted that the apparent low bidder, Haley Corporation of Texas, did not acknowledge receipt of the addendum. inutes .regular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 4 City Manager Martin informed the Council that the five alternates are all rather expensive items and stated that he is very pleased that the bids submitted were lower than the estimate which will probably allow for the inclusion of several of the alternates. Mayor Jones then introduced Mrs. Patty Mueller and stated that she was the Chairman of the Library Board during most of the planning and development stage of the new Central Public Library. Mayor Jones introduced Mrs. Jeff Bell who is the current Chairman of the Library Board. Mrs. Bell expressed pleasure at the range of the bids. Mayor Jones then recognized other members of the Library Board and the Friends of the Library who were present in the audience. Mayor Jones expressed appreciation to the companies that had submitted bids and stated that they will be tabled for 48 hours, pursuant to the requirements of the City Charter and referred to the staff for tabulation and recommendation. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mayor Jones called for consideration of the Consent Motions. 1. Bids be received August 29, 1984, for shelving and materials handling equipment for the new City Warehouse at 5352 Ayers. Estimated expenditure is $50,800. Funds are included in the 1984-85 Budget. 2. Approving a twelve months supply agreement, with option to extend for an additional twelve months, at the same terms and conditions, subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager, or his designee, for replacement auto, truck, and construction equipment safety glass based on low bid to Thurman-Fondren Glass Company. Estimated annual expenditure is $15,000. Twelve bid invitations were issued and two bids were received. Prices have increased approximately 8.7% since last contract of May, 1983. 3. Approving Change Order No. 6 for $7,828.97 on the O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant project for the furnishing and installation of 16 galvanized ladders to be installed in settling basins at the plant. These ladders were omitted from the original design and they are essential for proper maintenance and operation of the plant. No appropriation is necessary as funds are available in the contingency appropriation of the contract award. 4. Authorizing the City Manager to approve an amendment to a cooperative agreement between the Bureau of Reclamation and Texas Parks and Wildlife Department to increase the payment to the Department by $80,000 to a total of $358,500 so that the Department may complete plans and specifications for the Calliham Recreational Unit and provide staff support during construction of the remaining recreational facilities at Choke Canyon Reservoir. 5. Approving a twelve months supply agreement, with option to extend for an additional twelve months, at the same terms and conditions, subject to the inutes Regular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 5 approval of the supplier and the City Manager, or his designee, for janitorial supply items based on low bid meeting specifications to: CENTURY PAPERS, INC. Paper Supplies $47,062 Cleaners 15,408 Metal Garbage Cans & Lids 2,265 Misc. Janitorial Items 771 Total: $65,506 GULF COAST PAPERS Oil Dry & Sweep Comp. $ 524 Plastic Garbage Cans 2,198 Floor Brushes & Handles 1,106 Total: $3,828 BAYSIDE CHEMICAL Disinfectants & Hand Soap Total: CRYSTAL LAKE/M&M SALES Garbage Can Liners Brooms, Mops & Handles Total: $ 4,115 4,115 $11,069 5,616 $16,685 GRAND TOTAL: $90,134 Twenty seven bid invitations were issued and twelve bids were received. Prices have increased an average of 7% since the previous bid of January, 1983. 6. Plans and specifications be approved for a Parking Lot at the Greenwood Senior Citizens Center, and bids be received on September 11, 1984. This Community Development Block Grant project provides for the construction of a 23 space parking lot to relieve some of the overcrowding which has resulted from increased activities taking place at the center. (Attachment #6) City Manager Martin referred to item 4 and informed the Council that the City will be required to reimburse 50% of the cost to the federal government at some time in the future. He stated that this is a Bureau of Reclamation project. He also stated that he would like to make a change on the wording of the agenda item and pointed out that the payment to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department should be increased by $80,000 to $358,500 rather than from $80,000 to $358,500. Council Member Brown referred to item 5 and questioned the need for the purchase of metal garbage cans, pointing out that plastic bags are sometimes preferable. inutes Regular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 6 City Manager Martin stated that he agreed with Mr. Brown, if they are very good plastic bags. 7. Approving an amendment to the contract with Taft Architects & Kipp, Richter & Associates to provide for the design of two alternate mechanical systems for the new City Hall for an additional fee of $20,000. 8. Approving a cooperative agreement with Nueces County to operate a Public Health District. The agreement is required by Texas Senate Bill 109, passed in 1983, to continue the joint City -County Department of Public Health. The County Commissioners have approved the agreement. 9. Approving a public hearing to be held on August 30, 1984 by the Director of Planning in the Committee Room, City Hall, at 8:30 a.m., and that a second public hearing be held on September 4, 1984 by the City Council on the contractual annexation of 3.18 acres out of a portion of Lot 22, Section 5, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, owned by Interest Diversification Group, Inc., Ron Perry, President, generally located on the south side of Timbergate Drive, west of the intersection with Heaven's Gate Drive. 10. Authorizing the following actions on the Cole Street Improvement project: a. The project be accepted and final payment of $10,725.07 be authorized to Ibanez Construction Company, Inc. b. The contractor be granted a 10 day time extension against a 27 day time overrun due to additional work added by change order and delays caused by the relocation of utilities, and the contractor be charged liquidated damages for the remaining 17 days at a rate of $100 per day for a total of $1,700. The total cost of this 1982 Voluntary Paving Bond project, which provided for the reconstruction of Cole Street to residential street standards from Ocean Drive to Santa Fe Street, was $99,690.70. (Attachment #9) City Manager Martin referred to item 9 and stated that the agenda had indicated that a public hearing will be conducted on September 9, whereas the first public hearing will be on August 30, 1984. Mayor Jones referred to item 10 and in particular the liquidated damages charge of $100 per day and inquired if this is a standard charge. Mr. Lontos replied that the charge depends on the size and difficulty of the project, noting that certain projects require a much higher penalty. Council Member Slavik referred to item 7 and inquired if it is possible to make changes to the exterior design of the City Hall building or if it is too late. inutes .<egular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 7 City Manager Martin stated that it would be possible, but this would have to be discussed with the architects. He stated that there might not be a charge for changes at this point, if they are very minor in nature. Mayor Jones stated that he had received comments also in regard to the building facade. He stated that the photograph in the Corpus Christi newspaper did not really do it justice, and he felt that the model should be circulated to various meetings so that more people can see the building design. Assistant City Manager Bill Hennings informed the Council that the staff is in the process of displaying the model before various boards and commissions. Council Member Slavik agreed that there is a need to display the model or design of the building to as many groups as possible. She stated that she would like to have a report from the boards and commissions after they have seen the model of the building. Council Member Slavik referred to item 8 and inquired about the budget for this department. City Manager Martin explained that this item is just to extend the cooperative operation between the City and the County. He stated that the budget for the Health Department is $2.17 million, which is $200,000 greater than the previous year's budget, or about 8% increase. **Mayor Pro Tem Turner arrived at the meeting at 2:40 p.m. In a return to the discussion of the City Hall building, Council Member McComb stated that he had received comments on the new City Hall. He stated that he is not a critic, but he felt that the key item the Council needs to respond to is whether or not the building is functional as far as interdepartmental relationships. He stated that he has no problems with the building as long as it is attractive and functional. Mayor Jones ascertained that no one in the audience wished to speak in regard to the consent motions. A motion was made by Council Member Mendez that the consent motions, items 1 through 10, be approved, seconded by Council Member Guerrero, and passed unanimously. Mayor Jones called for consideration of the consent ordinances on items 11 through 24. Mayor Jones referred to Ordinance No. 15 which authorizes implementation of an approximate 4% increase to all salary schedules and salary ranges of City employees, with the exception of Fire and Police, which are covered by current collective bargaining contracts. Mayor Jones inquired if the 4% increase is recommended by the City Manager. City Manager Martin stated that although he is in favor of it, he felt that in view of the passage of the Charter Amendments, he was of the opinion inutes Regular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 8 that implementation of the action should be delayed until the Council has made the final decision on the entire budget. He stated that he would like to suggest that it be delayed for two weeks, if the Council concurs. Mayor Jones explained to the audience that there is a need to have the City Manager determine where the $1.9 million shortage in the Budget will be cut. He stated, however, that if the Council is sure that they do not intend to reduce the salary increases, then the Council could go ahead and approve this ordinance. Mayor Jones inquired as to how the 4% figure was arrived at and City Manager Martin explained that he was of the opinion that the 4% salary increase, when combined with the increased insurance and pension costs, represents a very strong economic package for the employees. He stated that the figure is based on inflation and cost of living increases involved. He stated that he felt that this is a wage increase that is very fair, but his question is that when there is a major cutback policy required, salaries are usually one of the areas that should be examined. He suggested that the salary increases (for fire and police) approved through the negotiation process might be discussed to see if both parties might be willing to renegotiate in view of the reduction in the budget. Mayor Jones stated that he felt if 4% was fair before, then it is still a fair increase. Council Member Mendez agreed that this is the only fair thing for the employees. He stated that the only problem he had with it is the question of whether it should include all employees, including the managerial positions. City Manager Martin reiterated that it includes all City employees equally, except fire and police. Council Member Guerrero inquired as to why there is a need for a 4% increase on ranges of salaries. City Manager Martin explained that the only legal and fair way to give an overall employee increase is by increasing all steps in the salary range. Council Member Guerrero expressed concern because there would be no limitation on the range and it could go on indefinitely. City Manager Martin agreed, but stated that that is what a general salary increase is -- it increases all ranges of salaries. He stated further that when an employee reaches a maximum range for a specific category, then he or she will not receive any more salary increases unless all of the ranges are increased. Council Member Mendez also referred to salary ranges and pointed out that if someone is in the lower salary range, there is no reason to increase all of the ranges in that classification if the higher ranges will not be applicable to a particular employee. City Manager Martin reiterated that that is the only way to grant a 4% increase for all employees. He explained further that a person cannot receive a merit increase that is greater than the maximum range of his grade. .nutes Regular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 9 Council Member Guerrero suggested withdrawing this ordinance until all of these questions can be resolved. City Manager Martin stated that if the Council decides to withdraw this ordinance, he would suggest pulling the fire and police salary increases also until this has been resolved. He explained further that for non -managerial employees, each step increase is 5%, but the managerial employees are evaluated annually and merit increases may be granted in a range from 0% to 10%. Council Member Brown expressed the opinion that the Council should not make the City employees wait any longer for their salary increase. Mayor Pro Tem Turner inquired if an employee reaches the maximum range in his category, if he could be reclassified to a higher grade and be eligible for salary increases. City Manager Martin explained that a department head cannot change the grade of an employee, but the City Manager can under circumstances by which the employee has assumed additional responsibilities. He explained that generally, the only way an employee can receive a salary increase after he has reached the maximum salary range in his grade is by applying for a higher position. He stated that an employee cannot be reclassified just because he has reached the maximum. Mayor budget two any reason Pro Tem Turner pointed out that the City Council had approved the weeks ago; they discussed the salary increases; and she did not see to change that. She stated that she was in support of approving the ordinance at this time. Some of the Council Members had additional questions about increasing all ranges, and Mrs. Leah Olivarri, Director of Administrative Services, listed actual figures on the blackboard to further explain the step increases as they related to the 4% increase. Mayor Jones called for comments from the audience on this particular ordinance. Mr. Robert Silva stated that he agreed with Council Member Guerrero. He inquired if this salary increase would include the City Manager, and Mayor Jones replied that it includes all employees and the City Manager. Mr. Silva stated that he believed that this City has the highest paid City Manager in the State of Texas and this is at the expense of the taxpayers and he agreed that this ordinance should be delayed for further study. City Secretary Read polled the Council for their vote on Ordinance No. 15 and it passed as follows: inutes .egular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 10 15. ORDINANCE NO. 18407 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 8127 OF THE COMPENSATION/CLASSIFICATION PLAN BY AMENDING SUBSECTIONS 501.1, 501.2, 501.3, 501.4 and 501.4.1 TO REFLECT AN ADDITIONAL 4 PERCENT OVER THE CURRENT SALARY LEVELS EFFECTIVE AUGUST 6, 1984, DELETING SUBSECTION 502.5 IN ITS ENTIRETY, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO INCREASE THE SALARY RANGES AND THE SALARIES OF EMPLOYEES IN THE MANAGERIAL GROUP BY APPROXIMATELY 4 PERCENT OVER THE CURRENT LEVELS EFFECTIVE AUGUST 6, 1984; AND THAT SECTIONS 510, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, BE AMENDED BY ADOPTING THE CURRENT MANAGERIAL AND NONMANAGERIAL JOB TITLES AND CLASSIFICATIONS AS IMPLE- MENTED IN THE 1984-85 BUDGET; AND AMENDING SECTIONS 651 AND 653 BY AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SET HOURLY RATES FOR ALL TEMPORARY AND PARTTIME EMPLOYEES; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. The Charter Rules was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Jones, Turner, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, McComb, Mendez, and Slavik voting "aye"; Berlanga absent. Council Member McComb referred to the allegation in regard to the pay increase for the City Manager. He explained to Mr. Silva that this 4% increase is not in addition to the salary of the City Manager that has been reported in the newspaper, but is acutally just the implementation of the salary increase granted the City Manager approximately one month ago by the City Council. City Manager Martin stated that he would like to withdraw Ordinance No. 23, which is the third reading of a lease agreement with Central Park Little League, in order to comply with the new charter amendment which requires that 30 days lapse between final passage and the first reading of the ordinance. He noted that this lease will not be in effect for an additional 60 days after that and the Little League's lease expires in September. He assured the Council though that they would be allowed to continue using this property through short term agreements until the lease is in effect. There were no comments from the audience on the other ordinances; City Secretary Read polled the Council for their votes; and the following ordinances were passed: 11. ORDINANCE NO. 18403 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 18105 BY AMENDING SECTION 3 IN ORDER TO ADOPT THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING STREETS: Cole Street, from Ocean Drive to Santa Fe Street; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Jones, Turner, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, and McComb voting "aye"; Berlanga absent; Mendez and Slavik absent at the time the vote was taken. inutes Regular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 11 12. ORDINANCE NO. 18404 CANVASSING THE RETURNS AND DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE CHARTER AMENDMENT ELECTION HELD ON THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1984; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Jones, Turner, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, and McComb voting "aye"; Berlanga absent; Mendez and Slavik absent at the time the vote was taken. 13. ORDINANCE NO. 18405 APPROPRIATING $1,250 FROM THE NO. 251 SANITARY LANDFILL BOND FUND FOR APPRAISAL SERVICES BY RICHARD CLOWER IN CONNECTION WITH THE ELLIOTT SANITARY LANDFILL EXPANSION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Jones, Turner, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, and McComb voting "aye"; Berlanga absent; Mendez and Slavik absent at the time the vote was taken. 14. ORDINANCE NO. 18406 APPROPRIATING $70,000 FROM THE NO. 250 SANITARY SEWER BOND FUND FOR FINAL PAYMENT TO MAVERICK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR COMPLETION OF THE SOUTH STAPLES SANITARY SEWER TRUNKLINE EXTENSION PHASE I PROJECT; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Jones, Turner, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, and McComb voting "aye"; Berlanga absent; Mendez and Slavik absent at the time the vote was taken. 16. ORDINANCE NO. 18408 AMENDING THE MASTER PLAN FOR STORM DRAINAGE FOR THE AREA SOUTH AND WEST OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AS PREPARED BY BLUCHER AND NAISMITH ENGINEERS, INC. AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 70721, RELATING TO PLATES 32 AND 35 OF SAID PLAN BY MODIFYING THE DRAINAGE AREAS AND THE LOCATION OF THE DRAINAGE OUTFALLS IN THE AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY STAPLES STREET, YORKTOWN BOULEVARD, CIMARRON BOULEVARD (COUNTY ROAD NO. 13), AND OSO CREEK; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Jones, Turner, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, and McComb voting "aye"; Berlanga absent; Mendez and Slavik absent at the time the vote was taken. 17. ORDINANCE NO. 18409 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 17951 BY AMENDING SECTION 3 IN ORDER TO ADOPT THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING STREETS: Baldwin Boulevard, (M.H. 408), from Agnes Street to Leopard Street; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. inutes Regular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 12 The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Jones, Turner, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, and McComb voting "aye"; Berlanga absent; Mendez and Slavik absent at the time the vote was taken. 18. ORDINANCE NO. 18410 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE CONTINUED EXISTENCE, USE, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF A HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF S.H. 44 AND TALBERT ROAD; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Jones, Turner, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, and McComb voting "aye"; Berlanga absent; Mendez and Slavik absent at the time the vote was taken. 19. SECOND READING AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, SECTION 53-254, SCHEDULE V, INCREASE OF STATE SPEED LIMIT IN CERTAIN ZONES, WHICH WILL CHANGE THE SPEED LIMIT ON PORTIONS OF SOUTH PADRE ISLAND DRIVE, HORNE ROAD, ALAMEDA STREET, ENNIS JOSLIN ROAD, VIOLET ROAD, AND McKINZIE ROAD; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. The foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed to its third reading by the following vote: Jones, Turner, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, and McComb voting "aye"; Berlanga absent; Mendez and Slavik absent at the time the vote was taken. 20. SECOND READING AMENDING SECTIONS 53-252, SCHEDULE III - PARKING PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMES ON CERTAIN STREETS, AND 53-253, SCHEDULE IV - STOPPING, STANDING OR PARKING DURING CERTAIN HOURS ON CERTAIN STREETS, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY DELETING AND ADDING DIFFERENT STREET SECTIONS TO THE SCHEDULES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. The foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed to its third reading by the following vote: Jones, Turner, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, and McComb voting "aye"; Berlanga absent; Mendez and Slavik absent at the time the vote was taken. 21. SECOND READING CLOSING AND ABANDONING THAT 235 FOOT LONG PORTION OF 50 FOOT WIDE ROBBY DRIVE; RETAINING A 10 FOOT WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY; AND PROVIDING FOR REPLAT OF SAID PROPERTY. The foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed to its third reading by the following vote: Jones, Turner, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, and McComb voting "aye"; Berlanga absent; Mendez and Slavik absent at the time the vote was taken. inutes .regular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 13 22. SECOND READING CLOSING AND ABANDONING THE SOUTH 20 FEET OF A 40 FOOT WIDE ROAD IN LOTS 12, 13, 20, 21, 28, 29, 36, 37, 44, AND 45, ARTEMUS ROBERTS SUBDIVISION; RETAINING A UTILITY EASEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR THE REPLAT OF SAID PROPERTY. The foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed to its third reading by the following vote: Jones, Turner, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, and McComb voting "aye"; Berlanga absent; Mendez and Slavik absent at the time the vote was taken. 23. WITHDRAWN (see page 10) 24. ORDINANCE 18411 CLOSING AND ABANDONING 60 FOOT WIDE MESTINA STREET, FROM THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF NORTH STAPLES STREET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAM RANKIN STREET, AND 60 FOOT WIDE NORTH ALAMEDA STREET, FROM THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF LIPAN STREET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF LEOPARD STREET TO BECOME EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 1, 1985. The foregoing ordinance was read for the third time and passed by the following vote: Jones, Turner, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, and McComb voting "aye"; Berlanga absent; Mendez and Slavik absent at the time the vote was taken. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mayor Jones called for consideration of Action by Ordinance on the Regular Agenda on item 25, which pertains to establishing a permit fee for the distribution of wastewater effluent. Mayor Jones inquired about the mechanics of handling the permits and fees. City Manager Martin explained that since the pump outlets will have to be staffed, that employee will handle the collection for each load of effluent. Council Member McComb stated that he had studied the staff recommendation and he would like to make the following suggestions in order to accomplish a better administration of the system and a better method of accounting for the fees collected: 1. Minimum size container/tank of 1,000 gallons; 2. Permit fee of $25.00 per 1,000 gallons per week per unit; 3. Drivers of units be required to have a certificate issued by the Health Department showing completion of instructions on the handling of wastewater; 4. Have an attendant at the loading sites; 5. Permits be displayed on the container/tank for verification. He explained that this would eliminate handling cash at the pump station. He expressed the opinion that this would be more fair than the operation proposed by the staff. Mayor Jones asked the City Manager for his opinion of these changes. City Manager Martin stated that if the operators can handle the payments, it would be easier. He did suggest, however, that the minimum be lowered to 500 inutes Regular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 14 gallons to accommodate the smaller units. He stated that his only concern was whether everyone should be treated as a commercial operator. He questioned whether this would be fair to individuals who pick up only one or two loads of effluent per week for their own personal use. Council Member Guerrero stated that on July 31, 1984, the original motion was to install additional pumps at the wastewater sites. He stated that he did not intend there to be a change in permit fees and he was concerned that this proposal would not provide enough additional pumps. City Manager Martin explained to the Council that the addition of two stations would cost the City about $4,000 and the next ones would be even more expensive because they would require adding caliche to provide roads to the wastewater plant, etc. He stated that the City would like to move up to nine stations eventually, but each station would have to be staffed seven days per week which would require from $400 to $500 per station per week. Council Member Guerrero referred to a bid that was submitted by a firm offering to install nine pumps at a cost of $2,000, yet the City is now going to pay $4,000 for the installation of only two pumps. Mayor Jones stated that he did not think it is the function of the City Council to tell the City Manager what to do -- this is an administrative problem. Council Member Brown stated that he is concerned because at this time it is possible for individuals to go out to the wastewater plant and get the effluent free, and he felt that Mr. McComb's proposal would hurt individuals who pick up effluent. Mayor Jones suggested that Mr. Matthews address the estimated cost of providing additional stations, and Mr. Matthews stated that his comments were based on the work prepared by Mr. Jim Van Havermaat of the Wastewater Services Division and includes the necessary pipe, road work, etc. in order to have a safe operation on the site. Mayor Jones suggested that possibly this item should be tabled until the staff has had an opportunity to study Mr. McComb's proposal. He stated that he had observed the preceding day the trucks that were waiting at one of the sites and he estimated that they would only have to wait about 15 or 20 minutes. He stated that he is not convinced that there is a real need for additional loading sites. Council Member Guerrero pointed out that this is more than just a service to the community -- it is also an opportunity for the City to establish an ongoing project to save water in the future, and he felt that guidelines should be established. Mayor Jones called for comments from the audience. Mr. Herman Johnson, owner of Turf and Irrigation Company on Airline Road, stated that in the past they had appeared before the Council individually, but inutes Regular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 15 they have now formed a group called the Green Industry, representing 1,200 to 1,500 employees. He stated that they had met with Mr. McComb and Mr. McComb had expressed the opinions of the entire Green Industry in his proposal. He expressed the opinion that if rain is not forthcoming, this would be an asset to the citizens and would benefit the companies that are in the business. He stated that it would be difficult for them to make very much money because they have to wait so long to fill their trucks or tanks, and they prefer the weekly $25.00 fee for each 1,000 gallon truck rather than having to pay each time they pick up a load of effluent. Mr. Dee Brooks stated that he is also in the Green Industry, but he is almost bankrupt and if he has to pay these license fees, he will be completely out of business. He explained that he was a very small operator and last week he only watered three lawns. He explained that previously he was in the lawn care business and because of the lack of business, he has been forced to discharge his employees; and he is the only one working at this time; and his only income is from watering lawns. He disagreed that there is a need for additional pumps. Council Member Kennedy inquired if it would be possible to set up a different category for people obtaining effluent who do not mind waiting to fill tanks or trucks. Council Member Guerrero expressed the opinion that that was the original intent in that if someone could wait for a few hours, there would be a free pump, but if time was critical to their operation, then they could obtain a permit. Mr. David Silverman addressed the Council and explained that he and twelve of his neighbors have obtained a 1,000 gallon container and it is properly equipped. He explained that they water twelve lawns every weekend. He questioned why they should have to pay for this effluent since they are private users and they have already paid for the water they have used and the wastewater charge. He objected to the installation of additional pump stations and stated that he has never had to wait more than one-half hour to load his truck. He expressed the opinion that some of the large companies are attempting to get individuals and small enterprises out of the effluent watering business. Mayor Jones inquired about the number of stations that are in existence at this time, and City Manager Martin stated that there are two at the Oso, plus one can draw it directly out of the lake; two at the Westside Wastewater Treatment Plant; two at the Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant; and one at the Allison Plant, for a total of seven stations. Mayor Jones pointed out that there is a free system now and he felt that possibly they should continue on the existing system for another week and check to see if there is really a need to make changes. Mr. Johnson addressed the Council again and expressed the opinion that next week would not be a good test week because rains have occurred recently. Further discussion followed and Council Member Brown made a motion that inutes .<egular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 16 this item be tabled for one week for further study. The motion was seconded by Council Member Kennedy and passed by the following vote: Jones, Turner, Brown, Kennedy and Mendez voting "aye"; Guerrero and Slavik voting "no"; McComb, no vote. After further discussion a motion was made by Council Member Mendez to reconsider the action just taken, seconded by Council Member Brown and passed unanimously. A motion was then made by Council Member Mendez that this item be tabled indefinitely until there are changes that dictate there is a need for additional pumps. The motion was seconded by Council Member Brown and passed by the following vote: Jones, Turner, Brown, Kennedy, McComb, and Mendez voting "aye"; Guerrero and Slavik voting "no". * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mayor Jones announced the public hearings on three zoning applications. 26. Application No. 784-17, Mr. George E. Meyer: For a change in zoning from "I-2" Light Industrial District to "B-4" General Business District on Lot 2A, Block 4, Interstate Industrial Complex, located west of Corn Products Road, south of I.H. 37. Assistant City Manager Tom Utter informed the Council that there was no response to the two notices of the public hearing that were mailed and that both the Planning Commission and Planning Staff recommend approval. Mayor Jones ascertained that no one in the audience wished to speak in regard to this zoning application. A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Turner that the hearing be closed, seconded by Council Member Slavik and passed unanimously. City Secretary Read polled the Council for their votes on the Ordinance effecting the zoning change and the following was passed: ORDINANCE NO. 18412 AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF GEORGE E. MEYER BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN REFERENCE TO LOT 2A, BLOCK 4, INTERSTATE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX FROM "I-2" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO "B-4" GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the following vote: Jones, Turner, Brown, Guerrero, McComb, Mendez and Slavik voting "aye"; Berlanga absent; Kennedy absent at the time the vote was taken. * * * * * * * * * * * * * 27. Application No. 784-2, Mr. Robert Gonzalez: For a change in zoning from "R -1B" One -family Dwelling District to "A-1" Apartment House District on Lnutes .<egular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 17 Lots 23 and 24, Block 4, Tracy Subdivision, located on the northeast corner of Tracy Avenue and Crosstown Expressway (Prescott Street) Mr. Utter stated that in response to the 20 notices of the public hearing, one in favor and five in opposition had been returned and that the Planning Commission recommends denial, but the Planning Staff recommends denial of the "A-1" zoning but in lieu thereof, that a special permit be granted to allow for four apartment units by removing the rear unit on Lot 23 and requiring the connection of the units in the front on Lot 24, complying with all building, plumbing and electrical codes, requiring off-street parking, and allowing the applicant six months to comply with these requirements to validate the now existing illegal uses. He also stated that the 20% rule is in effect on this case. Mr. Larry Wenger, Director of Planning, located the area on the zoning and land use map, described the land use in the surrounding area, which is primarily "R -1B" zoning, and showed slides of the vicinity, including the subject property on which several apartment units were located. At one of the Council Member's request, Mr. Utter read some of the letters of opposition. Mr. Wenger continued his presentation and explained the staff recommendation to bring the property into compliance with the zoning, stating that the Building Division had served the applicant notice of violation for having more than one dwelling unit in the "R -1B" zoning district as early as May of 1980. He informed the Council that the applicant, since that date, has added at least one more unit. Mr. Wenger stated that at this time there are three apartment units in the structure on Lot 24 and a single family home in front with a detached garage at the rear of Lot 23. Mayor Jones called on the applicant to speak. Mr. Robert Gonzalez, the applicant, stated that he was aware that people in the neighborhood are complaining about his property. He stated that he did not know that he had done anything wrong by just adding more apartments to provide low rent housing for the needy. He pointed out that there will be a funeral home in the neighborhood very soon and contended that he has enough space now for five parking spaces and requested that he be allowed to continue his operation. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Turner's question, Mr. Gonzalez stated that he has four units but some of the units are vacant. Council Member Mendez stated that he and Council Member Guerrero had attended the Planning Commission meeting when this case was discussed and there were a lot of complications in that some of the units were built without permits. He expressed the opinion that the special permit as recommended by the City staff is the ideal solution. Mr. John Haas, attorney for Mr. Gonzalez, stated that Mr. Gonzalez would be very pleased to accept the recommendation of the staff for a special permit, inutes _<egular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 18 even though he contends that he has obtained building permits for all of the construction. He assured the Council that Mr. Gonzalez is also eager to have all of the units inspected to see that they are in compliance. He expressed the opinion that there is no serious problem with parking and traffic and most of the objections from the neighbors were registered because Mr. Gonzalez violated the zoning ordinance. He informed the Council that he would like to present 30 statements from various neighbors who state in writing that they do not object to apartments on these two lots. Speaking in opposition to the zoning application was Mr. Leo Guszak, 2430 Prescott Street, who objected to the overcrowding on this piece of property. He expressed the opinion that with so many apartments and so little parking, when visitors are at the apartment, there will not be enough parking and although parking is permitted on the street, visitors have a tendency to park cars so that they extend over driveways of other residents. He also expressed the opinion that if this application is approved for apartment use, other applications from the area will be forthcoming. Mr. Wenger pointed out that four units would be the largest number Mr. Gonzalez could have under the suggested special permit because he will have to move one structure in order to provide additional parking. Mrs. Carmen Chapa, 2445 Riggan, stated that her home is directly across the alley from the rear of Mr. Gonzalez' property. She stated that she has had difficulty with him as a neighbor from the time he moved in. She informed the Council that Mr. Gonzalez constructed a second floor to his house and rented it and later moved a trailer onto the property for rental purposes also. She stated that they had complained about the existence of the trailer, at which time he had it removed. She stated that Mr. Gonzalez had a permit to build a utility room separate from his house and he then had three structures which he rents for apartments. She informed the Council that he has been in violation of the zoning ordinance for a number of years but nothing has been done by the City. She stated that she had filed complaints several times to no avail. She expressed the opinion that Mr. Gonzalez should abide by the zoning ordinance and she is opposed to the change in zoning and the special permit because of the inadequate parking for all of the apartments that he has. She pointed out that Tracy Street, which runs alongside his property, is very narrow and Prescott Street is oneway since it fronts on the expressway. She stated that she was apprehensive that access would be very difficult, particularly for emergency vehicles. Council Member Slavik mentioned that a similar situation exists in Flour Bluff and inquired as to why nothing is ever done to levy a fine against people when they are in violation of the zoning ordinance. Mr. Wenger explained that there is a process for illegal use and explained the lengthy process that requires three notices and eventually goes to court to resolve these violations. Mrs. Gonzalez, wife of the applicant, stated that she felt that they do have enough parking. She referred to Mrs. Chapa's statement that a permit had been acquired for the construction of a utility room and stated that this was inutes .egular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 19 true, but then someone came to them and asked to rent it because they had difficulty finding a low rental unit and Mr. Gonzalez decided to rent it. She mentioned also that there is room for their children to play. Mr. Leo G. Guszak referred to the traffic problem. He stated that he lives at the 19th Street exit from the freeway; cars travel very fast on Prescott Street; and the drivers do not look to see if vehicles are parked on Prescott Street, but instead look to observe the traffic exiting from the freeway. Mr. Mel Naranjo, 2601 Riggan, stated that he is a friend of the applicant and one of his neighbors also. He explained to the Council that the apartments are very nice, clean, and the property is well kept. He informed the Council that the applicant rents one of the apartments for $145 per month, including utilities, which is a very reasonable rent. He stated that he felt that Mr. Gonzalez performed a good service for people who cannot afford expensive apartments. He also stated that he did not think there would be any fire hazard and that the traffic generated is not excessive. Council Member Slavik pointed out that according to the information provided them, the staff has indicated that the Building Division served notice on Mr. Gonzalez in May of 1980 that his buildings were in violation. She inquired as to why that was not resolved. She stated that she would like to have a complete report on this matter, and Mayor Jones indicated that he would like to have copies for all of the Council Members. Mr. Utter stated that they would obtain this from the Building Division. Mrs. Charlotte Knesek, 301 Princess, stated that she is speaking on behalf of her mother, Mrs. Patti E. Manning, who owns property in the neighborhood. She stated that her mother is concerned about the sewer and noise problems. She informed the Council that when Mr. Gonzalez acquired the deed, he listed it as a homestead and is paying taxes accordingly. She informed the Council that there are a lot of people entering and exiting the property and it generates a lot of traffic. She also informed the Council that Mr. Gonzalez has been under a peace bond several times, but there is still a lot of noise and parties occurring at the subject location. She stated that Mr. Gonzalez even performs his construction on the lots late at night and disturbs all of the neighbors. She pointed out that there is a garage on the rear portion of the lot as well as the apartment/utility room structure. Mr. Jesus Davila spoke in favor of approval of the application, noting that Mr. Gonzalez provides housing for people who cannot afford much rent. A motion was made by Council Member Guerrero that the hearing be closed, seconded by Council Member Mendez. Mr. Reynaldo Montez stated that he would like to address the Council also and informed them that Mr. Gonzalez is a very nice individual. The motion to close the hearing passed unanimously. inutes Regular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 20 Mayor Jones expressed the opinion that the Council should concur with the staff recommendation for the special permit. A motion was made by Council Member Kennedy that Application No. 784-2 be denied, but in lieu thereof that a special permit be granted in accordance with the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Council Member Guerrero. Mayor Pro Tem Turner stated that she is concerned about the effect this would have on the neighborhood. Mr. Utter pointed out that in order to pass an ordinance for the special permit, seven affirmative votes will be required, but a simple majority would allow for passage of this motion. Mayor Jones called for the vote on the motion which failed to pass by the following vote: Jones, Brown, Kennedy and Mendez voting "aye"; Turner, Guerrero, McComb and Slavik voting "no"; Berlanga absent. Mr. Utter stated that the motion failed to pass by a majority vote of the Council, and City Secretary Read confirmed this. Mr. Utter stated that the staff will notify Mr. Gonzalez that his property is non -conforming and if he does not bring it into compliance, he will be subject to court action. Mr. Utter stated that he was only allowed to have one house on each lot, since both lots are zoned for single family dwellings. * * * * * * * * * * * * 28. Application No. 784-5, Mr. and Mrs. G. A. Esparza: For a change in zoning from "R -1B" One -family Dwelling District to "B-1" Neighborhood Business District on Lot 4, Block 3, Westwood Village, located between Gollihar Road and Chestnut Street, approximately 175' east of Willow Street. Mr. Utter informed the Council that in response to 17 notices of the public hearing, six in favor within the 200 foot notification area were received; three in favor outside the notification area; nine in opposition from within the 200 foot area; and a petition containing 43 signatures in opposition to the zoning application were returned, noting that 34 of the signatures on the petition were from outside the area of notification. He stated that both the Planning Commission and Planning Staff recommend denial and informed the Council that the 20% rule is in effect. Mr. Wenger located the area on the zoning and land use map, described the land use in the surrounding area, noting the use is for single family homes all the way down Chestnut Street and showed slides of the vicinity. Mayor Pro Tem Turner observed the slides, stated that she had driven by this property, and noted that the rear of the property seemed to be designed for business or professional use, and Mr. Wenger informed her that an office in a home for a professional use is allowed as a home occupation. inutes .egular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 21 Mayor Jones invited the applicant to speak. Mr. G. A. Esparza stated that he and his wife looked at the property and they were impressed with the office space at the rear of the property because they felt that it would be ideal for the operation of a beauty shop. He stated that they do not intend to turn the property into a commercial use. Mr. Esparza stated that he would like to address the following Planning Commission concerns: 1. Parking: He stated that they can comply with the City Codes on this because there is enough space in front of their garage for four vehicles. He stated they could even remove the garage to provide more parking if the City desired. He explained that the business use would be on the Gollihar side of the property rather than the Chestnut Street side and the only traffic will be from Gollihar. He assured the Council that if the beauty shop is successful, Mrs. Esparza will move to a commercial location. 2. Concerns about Mr. Esparza's business: His company is Esparza Pest Control; it is a one man operation that is operated by telephone with only one truck; and if he hired an additional employee, the employee would be allowed to take the vehicle home with him. Mr. Esparza summarized by stating that he would be satisfied with the special permit for the uses as explained. Council Member Mendez inquired about the number of operators in the beauty shop, and Mr. Esparza stated that it will be by appointment only and there will be only one chair. Council Member Guerrero stated that a beauty shop is not an operation that generates a lot of traffic. He also noted that Mr. Esparza's business of operating out of his home for his pest control company is allowed and the application being considered is just for a beauty shop at the rear of the lot. Council Member Slavik questioned why the Planning Commission did not consider a special permit and noted that Mr. Esparza did ask for a special permit. Mr. Utter stated that that was true, but the Planning Commission still recommended denial of the special permit as well as the change of zoning. Mayor Pro Tem Turner inquired if, with a special permit, several things can be stipulated such as prohibition of access from Chestnut Street, no parking on Gollihar, no additional employees, and that parking spaces be provided. Mr. Utter stated that that could be done and the parking would have have to comply with the parking requirements because head -in parking is not allowed on Gollihar. Mrs. Connie Esparza stated that she wanted to use the office that is attached to the house for one barber chair and that she will be the only operator. She stated that her business will be by appointment only. Council Member Slavik inquired of Mrs. Esparza if she would be willing to have a five year limitation for the special permit. inutes ,regular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 22 Speaking in opposition to the application Fir. She presented a petition to the Council Utter's presentation. She stated that they are residential area will become commercial. Mrs. lot of children in the neighborhood and she generate additional business zoning requests. was Mrs. Roberto Franco, 4430 which was referred to in Mr. all opposed to this because the Franco stated that there are a is afraid that approval will Council Member Slavik explained that a special permit would retain the "R -1B" zoning and the special permit would just be for the operation of a one -chair beauty salon. Mr. Utter concurred, stating that the property would remain "R -1B" and the special permit would be treated differently in that additional taxes would be charged according to the use. He stated, however, that if a special permit for a beauty shop is approved, the property could be purchased and sold many times and the special permit would remain in effect as long as it continues to be used for a beauty shop. He stated that the Council could stipulate a special use for a specific person if they wanted it to revert back to "R -1B" zoning in the event the property is sold. Mr. Richard Blassington, 3737 Chestnut Street, referred to the pictures of the property and pointed out that in the garage at the rear, Mr. Esparza keeps his work truck, another truck, and another car and at this time he has a boat trailer and truck parked in front of his property on Chestnut Street. He expressed concern if more than one chair in the beauty shop is allowed and questioned the statement Mr. Esparza had made that he would be willing to remove the garage to allow for additional parking, pointing out that all of his vehicles would then have to be parked on the street. A Mr. Pacheko addressed the Council and stated that he is in the beauty supply business and expressed the opinion that Mrs. Esparza is an excellent beauty operator and he felt that she would operate her shop in the proper manner. A motion was made by Council Member Mendez that the seconded by Council Member Slavik, and passed unanimously. A motion was made by Council Member Guerrero that the "B-1" be denied, but in lieu thereof that a special permit be approved specify that if the home is sold, the special permit would no longer be effect and the zoning will revert back to "R -1B". The motion was seconded Council Member Mendez. hearing be closed, requested zoning of to in by Mayor Jones repeated the motion by be for a one -chair beauty salon for Mrs. from Gollihar only; and the permit will zoning will revert back to "R -1B" if Mrs. stating that "the special permit would G. A. Esparza only; the access will be be for this person only and that the Esparza no longer operates the shop. The motion to approve the special permit passed unanimously by those present and voting. inutes Regular Council Meeting August 14, 1984 Page 23 * * * * * • * * * * * * * Mayor Jones called for the City Manager's Report. City Manager Martin reminded the Council that the meeting on August 21, 1984, would be a 5:00 p.m. evening meeting and there will be no workshop. He :referred to a draftletter that was placed in their packets that was addressed to the Governor in regard to the Council's concern about the housing allocation method utilized for tax-exempt bonds for purchase of single-family dwellings and inquired if the Council agreed to the content of the letter. A motion was made by Council Member Mendez that the letter to Governor White be approved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Turner, and passed unanimously. Mayor Jones then referred to the JTPA/HIALCO complaint. He stated that HIALCO had filed a complaint against the staff with many allegations since they did not receive an allocation; a hearing was held; and David Herrin had found in the City's favor. He stated that he hoped this would resolve the entire matter. Mayor Jones ascertained that there were no petitions or information from the audience on matters not scheduled on the agenda. There being no further business to come before the Council, on motion by Council Member Guerrero, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Turner and passed unanimously, the Regular Council Meeting was adjourned at 5:45 p.m., August 14, 1984. dz/tb