HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes City Council - 08/21/1984MINUTES
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 21, 1984
5:00 P.M.
PRESENT:
Mayor Luther Jones
Mayor Pro Tem Betty N. Turner
Council Members:
David Berlanga, Sr.
Welder Brown
Leo Guerrero
Dr. Charles W. Kennedy, Jr.
Joe McComb
Frank Mendez
Mary Pat Slavik
City Manager Edward A. Martin
City Attorney J. Bruce Aycock
City Secretary Bill G. Read
Mayor Luther Jones called the meeting to order in the Council Chamber of
City Hall.
The invocation was given by Lt. Terence Thomas of the Salvation Army,
following which the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States was
led by Council Member Frank Mendez.
City Secretary Bill G. Read called the roll of required Charter Officers
and verified that the necessary quorum was present to conduct a legally
constituted meeting.
Mayor Jones called for consideration of the Minutes of the Regular Council
Meetings of August 7, 1984 and August 14, 1984 and the Special Council Meeting
of August 7, 1984. He noted that Council Member McComb had requested that a
change be made in the vote on one item on the Minutes of August 14, 1984.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Turner that the Minutes be approved,
seconded by Council Member Mendez.
MICROFILMED
.tes
jular Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 2
Council Member Mendez stated that he would like to call for reconsideration
of Council Member's McComb during the meeting of August 14th in regard to the
transfer of funds from the Utilities Fund to the General Fund.
City Manager Martin suggested that the Minutes of that meeting be approved
because the Council is allowed to reconsider a motion during the next regularly
scheduled meeting. He informed the Council that the motion that they adopted
can be reconsidered today or at a later date.
The motion to approve the Minutes passed unanimously.
Council Member Mendez continued by stating that he felt that the Council
should reconsider the motion made by Council Member McComb in regard to transfer
of funds and asked Mr. McComb to explain again.
Council Member McComb stated that his proposal was simply that the in lieu
of taxes be allowed to remain in the Utilities Fund and that those funds be used
to pay towards the wastewater debt service which basically, was the instruction
of the Charter Amendment which was passed during the election of August 11 in
regard to interdepartmental transfer of funds. He stated that his position the
preceding week was that that money should be left in the Utilities Fund to go
towards repayment of debt service for wastewater since this item was receiving
funding from other budgets. He explained that this would accomplish the
following things: (1) It could very well prove to be funds to meet debt
service which was the intent of the amendment. He stated that this would allow
some relief for property owners paying ad valorem taxes and yet it would still
be in accordance with the Charter Amendment which was passed by the voters. He
pointed out that this would also allow the City Manager to go back to see how
those figures would affect the budget, noting that the 2.5 million dollar
deficit predicted did not anticipate the lower receipts in the Water Department
due to the water shortage. He stated that after these figures are corrected,
the City Manager would be allowed to recommend a tax rate reduction and still
accomplish the necessary items included in the budget, plus be in compliance
with the Charter Amendment which was approved.
A motion was made by Council Member McComb that this practice be adopted.
The motion was seconded by Council Member Brown.
Mayor Jones stated that the intent of the motion was that the fees
considered as in lieu of taxation would go to satisfy the debt service in the
Utilities Department, including Wastewater.
Mayor Pro Tem Turner stated that she has an alternate proposal. She
expressed appreciation to Council Member McComb for working out his solution but
stated that she had worked on this during the past week and she would like to
make the following suggestions: (1) continue to collect the in lieu of fees;
tes
n-yular Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 3
(2) retain the fees collected for water in the Water Fund; (3) transfer the
fees collected in the Gas Fund to the Wastewater Services Fund for debt service;
and (4) work to keep gas and water rates as low as possible. Mrs. Turner
explained that she is suggesting that the transfer of fees in the Gas Fund be
made to retire wastewater debt service.
Mayor Pro Tem Turner continued by stating that the Water Fund currently has
in excess of $2 million in debt service and she felt that the practice should be
continued to collect in lieu of fees in the Water Fund but these fees be used
exclusively to increase the fund in the Water Fund Reserve to provide funds for
capital improvements.
City Manager Martin stated that both actions suggested by Mayor Pro Tem
Turner and Council Member McComb are legal, proper actions under the City's
budget requirements, the Charter, and the Charter as recently amended. He
stated that he would like to come back to the Council with a series of options
for them to approve. He stated that Mr. McComb's motion is to look at the
budget to use some of the in lieu funds for wastewater debt service and Mayor
Pro Tem Turner's is to look only at the Gas Fund for this purpose.
Mayor Jones expressed the opinion that these options should be in writing
and considered next week, and Council Member Guerrero agreed.
Mayor Pro Tem Turner stated that she felt very strongly that the in lieu of
Gas Fund should be used for wastewater debt service since there is no debt
service in the Gas Fund.
Council Member Berlanga inquired if the Council plans to retain the funds
in the Utility Fund, what effect that would have on the tax rate and on the
water rate and inquired if either of these would provide any relief for the
citizens.
Mayor Jones expressed the opinion that either of the motions would provide
some relief. He pointed out that either one of the proposed actions would
reduce the taxes to the extent that it would reduce the drain on the General
Fund to pay the wastewater debt service.
City Manager Martin pointed out that one caveat is what the Council does on
the other side of it, noting that if the Council agrees to remove money from the
in lieu of Tax Fund and place it in the Wastewater Fund for debt service, the
General Fund would be increased by the amount of funds that are designated for
this purpose. He noted that in either case, it would be necessary to make some
expenditure reductions, and depending upon how many of those reductions the
Council selects will dictate whether or not the taxes could be reduced. He
further explained that as soon as he has Council direction on what to expect in
regard to the budget cuts, the Staff will be able to predict how these transfers
will affect the General Fund and the tax rate. He pointed out that if the
Council decides to use in lieu of payments to pay the wastewater debt service,
:es
._,alar Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 4
the General Fund would be increased by that exact amount. He stated that he
originally planned to present recommendations to the City Council next week to
deal with this but with the directions he has received from the City Council in
regard to the wastewater debt service, he would prefer to have this on the
agenda for September 4, and Mayor Jones agreed that that would be preferable.
A motion was made by Council Member Mendez that both motions or proposals
be tabled for two weeks, seconded by Council Member Slavik and passed
unanimously.
City Manager Martin stated that he understood that he was to have an agenda
item on the Workshop of the September 4 meeting to consider this subject.
Mayor Jones noted with appreciation the large number of people appearing in
the Council Chamber with T-shirts with the wording, "Cheers for the City
Council".
Mayor Pro Tem Turner stated that she would like to introduce Mr. Glen Kost,
Dean of Del Mar College.
Dean Kost stated that he was speaking as President of the Board of Corpus
Christi Osteopathic Hospital and expressed gratitude on behalf of the Board for
the service of Mayor Jones on that Board from November of 1978 through May of
1984. Dean Kost then presented a plaque to Mayor Jones expressing their
appreciation.
Mayor Jones responded by stating that it was always a very rewarding
experience to work with hospital boards.
Council Member Kennedy stated that he would like to present his proposed
resolution, and Mayor Jones recognized Dr. Kennedy.
Council Member Kennedy provided background information by stating that
during the past week, an article appeared in the newspaper on Thursday morning
that upset him quite a bit, at which time he requested that a resolution be
prepared. He referred to statements made in the newspaper article to the effect
that the Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant was overloaded and development of
the Bayfront Downtown Area should be curtailed until improvements had been made.
He stated that, in fact, the capacity of that wastewater plant is ten million
gallons and the current use is eight million gallons. He stated that he was
particularly disturbed about the message in the paper because companies
considering moving into the City might have been discouraged by such an article
projecting an overloaded sewer plant and a shortage of water. He stated that he
rtes
.._3ular Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 5
did not think that this was the opinion of the majority of the City Council. He
then read the resolution in its entirety and summarized by stating that by
passing this resolution of intent, the City Council will renew and strengthen
its effort to protect the City's unique environment and expand the quality of
life so essential to the citizens and visitors by supporting the attraction of
new industry, the expansion of existing industrial and commercial development
through guided growth, the creation of new jobs and the broadening of the tax
base.
A motion was made by Council Member Kennedy that the resolution of intent
be passed, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Turner.
Council Member Guerrero stated that the comments reported in the newspaper
were not true because this is a live, viable City that is looking to the future.
Council Member Guerrero also pointed out that the people in the audience
expressing support of the City Council are working people, not the "silk
stocking" people as indicated at times.
Council Members expressed support of the resolution.
Council Member Slavik stated that she felt that she was the subject of Dr.
Kennedy's remarks. She stated, however, that the statement in the paper was
erroneous and informed the Council that in the afternoon paper, a correction has
been printed. She stated that she was simply misquoted and assured the Council
that she supports the proposed resolution because she is in favor of guided
growth and additional industries in the City.
Mayor Jones called for comments from the audience.
Mrs. Susan Taft, 729 Harrison, stated that they have every confidence that
the City Council and the City Staff can find a solution to the water problem and
agreed with the intent of the proposed resolution.
Mr. Ed Knudsen, 715 Broadway, stated that he was present at the meeting at
the time Council Member Slavik's remarks were made and he assured the Council
that she was misquoted in the newspaper. He stated that at no time did Mrs.
Slavik say that the sewer plant was overcrowded but instead, she had stated that
with the new development, the plant could become crowded and at that time
something would have to be done. He also assured the Council that at the
subject meeting, no one made any disparaging remarks about any Member of the
City Council or the City Staff.
Mr. Foster Edwards, Chairman of this year's Leadership Corpus Christi
Alumni, explained that that group had decided that they wanted to do something
to express support of the City Council and their Board was very concerned and
carefully considered whether the landmass should be supported. He explained the
procedure by which they had obtained the opinions of the membership, noting that
50% of a voter turnout is required before they can go public with an opinion.
He informed the Council that 83.3% of their membership voted in favor of
supporting the landmass.
tes
h -,alar Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 6
Mr. Jesse Tovar, 421 Eldon Street, stated that he was present on behalf of
numerous labor union members. He stated that they are wholeheartedly in support
of this proposed resolution and since the statements previously reported in the
Caller -Times have been corrected in today's newspaper, he would not address
those remarks. He stated that development and construction are what supports
their families.
Dr. Dean Banks, 225 Waverly, assured the Council that he had been present
at the meeting referred to and that Council Member Slavik did not make the
statements that were reported in the Caller -Times. He explained that she did
state that when the new hotels are on line, the Broadway Wastewater Treatment
Plant will be strained and mentioned that it would be two years before a bond
election could be held to provide funds for such enlargement. He noted that the
Caller -Times report also stated that postcards were handed out at that meeting
urging people to oppose the landmass and stated that that was simply not true.
Dr. Banks pointed out that many of the things that have occurred in the last few
days and the meeting conducted by some developers and labor unions were based on
erroneous facts reported in the Caller -Times. He stated that to his knowledge,
rarely had he ever heard anyone attack the landmass as being a shopping center.
He also expressed concern that the stereotyping of people and the mudslinging
that has occurred as a result of the recent meeting are most unfortunate because
no one opposed to the landmass are actually opposed to landmasses as such, only
the commercial type of landmass as proposed in the agreement.
Mr. Jack Graham spoke in favor of the passage of the resolution and noted
that he is in favor of growth and development.
Mr. Hank Snyder addressed the Council and expressed appreciation to them
and stated that he is proud of each and every one of them. He also stated that
he felt that this City had the finest City Manager in the Nation who is
outstanding and has outstanding assistants as well. He also stated that he knew
that Dr. Banks had, indeed, referred to the landmass as a shopping center. He
also reminded the Council that the landmass is the result of a recommendation of
a professional study of what is needed on the bayfront.
Mrs. Marie Speer, Editor of the Flour Bluff Sun, stated that the resolution
has nothing to do with the landmass or Council Member Slavik's statements. She
expressed the opinion that the resolution is vague but is similar to repledging
marriage vows.
Mayor Pro Tem Turner agreed that the resolution is a reaffirmation of a
controlled growth and the City Council's belief in the City of Corpus Christi.
The following resolution was passed:
RESOLUTION NO. 18320:
REAFFIRMING THE CITY COUNCIL'S CONTINUING EFFORTS TO SUPPORT THE ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT OF OUR CITY TO THE EXTENT OF OUR NATURAL RESOURCES BY THE ATTRACTING
OF NEW INDUSTRY, THE EXPANSION OF EXISTING INDUSTRY AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
THROUGH GUIDED GROWTH, THE CREATION OF NEW JOBS, AND THE BROADENING OF THE TAX
BASE; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
ites
,._gular Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 7
The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing resolution was passed by the
following vote: Jones, Turner, Berlanga, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, McComb,
Mendez and Slavik voting "Aye."
Mayor Jones informed the Council that Council Member Leo Guerrero desired
to make a comment about the ruling of the Water Allocation and Review Board and
the special allocation for the use of water by Seaside Memorial Cemetery.
City Manager Martin pointed out to the Council that action could not be
taken on this subject since it has not been posted. He stated that he was of
the opinion that it could be discussed as long as the Council takes no action
unless notice has been posted two hours prior to taking action. He noted,
however, that the discussion might take some time, and inquired of the City
Attorney if a notice could be posted and action taken two hours following the
posting.
City Attorney Aycock stated that he felt that it would be more appropriate
to consider this under petitions from the audience.
Council Member Guerrero referred to a copy of his memorandum that was sent
to the Water Allocation and Review Committee and stated that he was of the
opinion that the City Council had the authority to overrule the Board's decision
in allowing the cemetery to use large amounts of water, noting that such action
had upset the citizens who are not allowed to water lawns.
A motion was made by Council Member Guerrero that the decision of the Water
Allocation and Review Board in allowing cemeteries to water grass be overruled
and that they be prohibited from watering their grass during the water shortage.
The motion was seconded by Council Member Mendez.
Council Member Kennedy stated that he had not seen the Minutes of the Water
Allocation Board at which time they took this action and stated that he would
like to hear comments from members of that Committee before voting on this
motion.
Mayor Jones pointed out that action cannot be taken on this matter until
the proposed action has been posted on the official bulletin board for two
hours. He stated that he concurred with the action proposed by Council Member
Guerrero to overrule the decision of the Water Allocation and Review Board.
Mr. Douglas Matthews, Director of Public Utilities, explained the action of
the Board by stating that Mr. Reid Ryan of Seaside Memorial Cemetery had
appeared before the Committee on three different occasions to request permission
to use water and his request was denied until he came back with a proposal that
if the City would allow him to use a certain amount of water until he was able
to install two wells for watering purposes, then he would use that method of
watering the grass rather than using City water.
ces
kcyular Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 8
Mr. Matthews pointed out that Mr. Ryan is allowed to water his shrubbery
now the same as anyone else in the City. He informed the Council that Mr. Ryan
had also stated that he would not only dig the wells but he would install a
desalinization plant and use that water and be removed from the City's water
supply system completely. He explained that under those circumstances, it
seemed to the Board that this would be a good measure which would eventually
save the City a great deal of water.
Mr. Ted Turner, Business Representative on the Board, explained that their
decision had nothing to do with the fact that this was a cemetery but instead,
they had considered the fact that Seaside Cemetery was an employer and their
decision was aimed at saving jobs as well as eliminating a user of the City's
water supply. He expressed the opinion that the rules of the water situation
had changed in that there are going to be some businesses and industries that
are going to need some assistance while they explore alternate sources of water,
and the Board is trying their best to be fair and equitable.
Mayor Jones inquired if they had declined to approve a request for watering
grass by other companies, and Mr. Turner assured the Council that they have
received requests for watering grass over and over again but this particular
decision had nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that this was a cemetery
with large areas of grass because it was strictly a measure to save jobs and
eventually provide an alternate source of water for the cemetery.
Mayor Jones pointed out that many jobs had been lost because of the water
shortage in similar situations to that of Seaside Cemetery.
Council Member Kennedy stated that he thought that the decision the Council
makes on this issue needs to be made with the view of what will happen in a few
months, or in other words, a large user who will have his own water supply. He
then questioned the Staff as to how much water Mr. Ryan would be allowed to use
if the cemetery is considered to be an industry, and Mr. Matthews stated that he
did not have those figures.
Council Member Kennedy continued by pointing out that if his company is
considered to be an industry, he would be allowed to use 75% of the amount he
used the previous year.
Mr. Matthews explained that the ruling by the Board was that he be allowed
to use 500,000 gallons over a 30 -day period except he could not do so if the
City received as much as one-half inch of measurable rain.
Mr. Chuck Akers, a Member of the Water Allocation Board, stated that one
issue here is that this, too, is an industry in Corpus Christi; Mr. Ryan used
7.4 million gallons last month; the Board approved the use of 500,000 gallons of
water for two months; but they were of the opinion that the City would gain 14
million gallons of water if his proposed desalinization plant is in operation.
He also expressed the opinion that if the cemetery could be classified as an
industry, they could use 75% of the amount they used the preceding year.
:es
n-,ular Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 9
Council Member Guerrero expressed the opinion that this is not a business
decision and the City Council cannot afford to gamble on the possibility of the
desalinization plant providing ample water for Mr. Ryan. He stated that if the
City makes enough of these long-term decisions, there is reason for great
concern and his concern is that a precedent will be established because other
users will appear before the Water Allocation Board and ask for the same
consideration.
Council Member Mendez stated that he could understand why the Water
Allocation and Review Board granted this use of water. He stated that in two
months, they will have a desalinization process and he wondered what would
happen to the grass if he were not allow to water it during that period.
Mr. Turner stated that he could not answer that question, but he knew that
lawns all over the City are dying.
Mr. Mendez then pointed out that if this business is commercial, they would
only have to cut back 25% at this time, but in Phase III, lawn watering will be
strictly prohibited.
Mr. Turner stated that the Board did not consider the cemetery as an
industry.
Council Member McComb stated that under the formula, he could be considered
an industry and might be qualified for the 75% of last year's water use.
Mayor Pro Tem Turner stated that she felt that the Board was doing a very
good job and informed the Council that she had driven all over the City and
unfortunately, lawns and shrubs are dying in all areas. She stated that in view
of this, she did not feel that the City can allow the use of water to water
grass for any reason anywhere and although she agreed that the Board's decision
was correct from a business standpoint, she did not feel that the cemetery
should be allowed to water lawns when no one else is.
Council Member Slavik agreed that the Board is doing an excellent job and
that under the circumstances, and because Seaside Memorial Cemetery is going to
install a desalinization plant for their use, they should be allowed this
allotment of water for this two-month period.
Mr. Turner stated that the message that the Board was trying to convey is
the fact that they would like to see any residences or businesses removed from
the City's water system if they had the means to do so. He stated that the
Board needs guidance if the Council does not want them to continue with this.
Council Member Brown also expressed his appreciation for the efforts of the
Board and stated that he felt that they made a reasonable decision for Seaside
Cemetery, but there is a rule of no lawn watering, and the City must enforce
this.
Utes
nagular Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 10
Mr. Reid Ryan, Manager of Seaside Cemetery, explained that this is not just
watering a lawn because the cemetery is an unusual business. He stated that
there are some people who feel that cemeteries are very important; there are a
large number of people who are in the process of purchasing lots at the
cemetery; and if the cemetery is allowed to disintegrate, their business will
suffer. He explained that they requested the one million gallons of water just
until they get the desalinization plant installed in about two months. He
explained that to water that much of an area of grass with effluent would cost
about $50,000 per month; he stated that when they have the desalinization plant,
they will have 3 million gallons of water; and they have offered to share this
with other people. He expressed the opinion that they are no different from
other industries and he was of the opinion that they should be allowed to use
75% of the amount of water used last year. He stated that unless the cemetery
is given water to keep the grass alive, he does not plan to continue with the
effort to install the desalinization equipment.
Mayor Jones stated that he plans to support the motion made by Council
Member Guerrero because other citizens in Corpus Christi are being very
conservative and when they see the water being used at Seaside for lawn
watering, it makes them very resentful because it is not accessible to other
people of Corpus Christi.
Mr. Ryan stated that they plan to produce three million gallons per month
after the desalinization plant is installed at a cost of $100,000 and this water
would be suitable for swimming pools and similar uses and he would be glad to
return water to the City of Corpus Christi. He stated that when the water
shortage is over, they would like to have the right to return to the City of
Corpus Christi for their water because it is less expensive than desalinization.
Mayor Jones stated that probably in the future, a time will come when the
City will be glad to have all of its water customers.
Council Member Guerrero inquired about the results of the two wells that
had been dug, and Mr. Ryan said that the well water is not suitable for watering
grass because of the high salt content.
Council Member Kennedy stated that he could understand people being upset
when they read in the newspaper that Seaside Cemetery is watering their grass,
but he agreed with the Board that the water should be allocated since such
measures will eventually save the City water. He stated that he supported the
Board on this decision because the City could use less water and it is possible
that other water could be saved if it could be sold or used for swimming pools
and landscaping purposes. He stated that he would vote to oppose the motion.
Council Member McComb stated that he felt that it is worth a 60 -day trial
period to allow Seaside the use of the water for that time since they will soon
desalinate 3 million gallons of water, some of which could be used by other
companies in Corpus Christi.
ates
.._gular Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 11
Council Member Guerrero informed the Council that if they did not vote for
his motion, they would be subject to even more similar requests.
Council Member Berlanga stated that he thought that Mr. Ryan was making a
very sensible offer and he was of the opinion that he should be treated as other
industries. He stated that he is in favor of working with Mr. Ryan in order to
allow him to construct his desalinization plant.
Council Member Brown stated that he thought that this was a unique
situation and he did not think that there would be very many businesses that
would plan to build a desalinization plant; therefore, he felt that they should
allow him to use the water for a 60 -day period.
Council Member Guerrero stated that if the City Council allows this lawn
watering, the entire community would be jeopardized emotionally.
Council Member Slavik stated that she will not support the motion to
prohibit the water at Seaside because the City will eventually gain much more
water than he will be allowed to use during the next two months.
Mayor Jones called for the motion to prohibit the watering of lawns by
cemeteries, including Seaside Cemetery, and the motion failed to pass by the
following vote: Jones, Turner, Guerrero and Mendez voting, "Aye"; Berlanga,
Brown, Kennedy, McComb and Slavik voting, "No".
* * * * * * * *
Mayor Jones called for consideration of Item No. 21 which is an action by
motion from the Regular Agenda as follows:
21. Approving the recommendation of the Cable Commission which clarifies the
channel location of CBN and religious access channels. The Cable
Commission recommends that CBN remain on Channel 10 and that religious
access programming be located on Channel 29.
City Manager Martin provided background information by stating that the
basic issue is the channel location of CBN and the location of the religious
access channel. He informed the City Council that the Cable Commission is
recommending that CBN remain on Channel 10 and that the religious access
programming be on the upper Channel 29. He explained that the alternatives are
that the City Council may confirm the action of the Cable Commission or may
reverse that recommendation. He further explained that the religious access
channel representatives had requested that they be allowed to have four hours of
prime time on Channel 10 and the rest of their programming on Channel 29. He
informed the City Council that the Cable Commission has not had an opportunity
to deal with that compromise solution and he would be in favor of allowing the
Commission to provide their comments on this solution before the Council rules
on the matter.
tes
1.-yular Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 12
Council Member Brown stated that he is opposed to the recommendation of the
Cable Commission because the religious access programming would lose about 50%
of their audience if they have to move to Channel 29 which is not carried on
very many viewers' sets.
Council Member Kennedy stated that if the suggestion can be technically
placed in operation, he would recommend that the four hours of prime time be
approved, but if it cannot, he would like to suggest that mid -band channels be
used if the religious access program has to be moved to Channel 29. He stated
that his question was whether or not it would be possible for them to have four
hours on Channel 10 and the remainder of their programs on Channel 29.
City Manager Martin stated that he saw no problem with that because Athena
Cablevision is carrying the double programming for these two groups now so he
was sure that it could be done.
Assistant City Attorney Jay Doegey explained that the problem now is that
CBN requires that their programming be carried in its entirety, particularly in
view of the exposure guaranteed to their advertiser and that is the problem
because CBN has a contract with Athena under those terms. He explained that at
this time, the religious access programs are interfering with that commitment.
He explained further that the franchise between the City and Athena Cablevision
includes the provision that they must provide religious access channel and there
was no stipulation where that channel should be. He pointed out that the
educational programs are on the upper tier now.
Mayor Pro Tem Turner stated that she felt that CBN should have Channel 10
but she would like for the religious programming by the local groups be provided
a lower tier channel also. She then inquired if any discussion had been
conducted about the possibility of moving Channel 8 programs to the upper tier.
Mr. Doegey stated that they discussed moving the programs on Channel 8, but
Athena Cablevision felt that there was as much interest in KHTV as there is in
CBN. Mr. Doegey also pointed out that about 75% of the new TV sets sold are all
access channels and the older sets are not cable ready.
To one of the Council Member's questions, he stated that they had
considered conducting a survey to see how many viewers had the cable ready sets
but a scientific survey such as this would cost many thousands of dollars.
Council Member Mendez stated that he had read the material in regard to
this and he agreed with the report issued by Dr. Etheridge which constitutes a
compromise and would allow some prime time for the religious access channel. He
stated that the Council needs to decide what is important to the community and
pointed out that CBN provides some family-oriented programs. He stated that the
religious access programs also are family programs and he felt that the proposed
four-hour compromise should be considered.
Utes
__gular Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 13
A motion was made by Council Member Slavik that this matter be sent to the
Cable Commission for further consideration to see if a compromise between CBN
and the religious access group can be worked out to allow the religious access
group approximately four hours on Channel 10 for their programs.
The motion was seconded by Council Member Brown.
Council Member McComb pointed out that the religious access group is being
provided this service free; the other groups that are getting free service are
on the upper channels; and stated that he has a problem with sending this back
to the Cable Commission recommending a compromise when they were not able to
come up with a compromise during their earlier discussions. He stated that he
had a real problem with a group that is receiving free service to be allowed to
dictate which channel their program should be shown on.
Mayor Jones pointed out that this was an item included in the franchise
agreement.
Mayor Jones then called for comments from the audience.
Sister Janie Barrera, Secretary -Treasurer of the Religious Access Group,
stated that it would be preferable to have both on the same tier. She stated
that they have been working together since 1972 on the religious access
programming and in December of 1983, they were told to find an alternative
solution and they have been trying to do so. She informed the City Council that
her group was originally informed that they could have Channel 10 and she was of
the opinion that local groups should have some programming on the first tier.
Sister Barrera agreed to having this referred back to the Cable Commission to
see if the local religious groups could have something on the lower tier whether
it is Channel 10 or some other channel. She assured the Council that if the
compromise is agreed to, her group would set up guidelines and have programs on
for two hours a day.
Mayor Jones asked Sister Barrera how the decision will be made as to which
group would be allowed to use the religious access channel for that prime time.
Sister Barrera replied that twenty different denominations are using the
local religious programming and a decision would have to be made as to which are
of better quality and suitable to be shown on Channel 10 if they are limited to
a few hours a day.
Mrs. George Clark stated that she watched Channel 10 frequently and becomes
very irritated when the programs on CBN are pre-empted to allow for the viewing
of the local religious groups' programs. She stated that when that is done, she
misses seeing some very good speakers and music produced by CBN. She stated
that she objected to the quality of the programs sponsored by the local
religious groups.
rtes
a...gular Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 14
Mr. Mark Solo, representing CBN from Dallas, Texas, commended the local
religious access groups because they are doing a very good job. He asked the
City Council if they had received a letter from him and stated that he has been
working on this for many months and he objected to this being sent back to the
Cable Commission. He explained that CBN is supported by advertising; they, too,
provide family entertainment; the morality of the programming for the other
commercial channels is not very desirable for children and young people, yet
some of the outstanding programs offered by CBN are being pre-empted by the
local religious programs and citizens then turn their sets to another channel.
He reminded the Council that CBN has a contract for full-time programming and
they have had for over a year, but they feel that the problem should be resolved
as soon as possible. He recommended approval at this time of the recommendation
of the Cable Commission.
Council Member Slavik pointed out that the religious access group indicated
that they would be satisfied with four hours a day on Channel 10 and questioned
what the harm would be in having the Cable Commission consider this proposal.
She pointed out that if the religious access group has to go to the upper tier,
they would lose many of their viewers.
Mr. Solo explained that their advertisers have a product to sell and CBN
has a contract for so many commercials; they sign contracts and the time is sold
to their advertisers; but suddenly, they are not able to comply with their
contracts when their programs are pre-empted for the local group.
Council Member Kennedy inquired if the commercials could be shown during
the local access programs, and Mr. Solo replied that some of the ads are shown
within the shows, not just at the beginning and end of the programs. He also
pointed out that some of the products are not suitable for the types of programs
being shown at that time.
Mr. Andy Grimes, Area Manager of Athena Cablevision, stated that the
proposed compromise with CBN is totally unacceptable and stated that it is
comparable to ABC or CBS and it is simply not possible to interrupt their
programming. He also expressed the opinion that it would be impossible for the
religious access groups to determine which program should be shown on Channel 10
and which should be shown on the upper tier channel. He also expressed the
opinion that the religious access group wants to continue to use Channel 10
because of the popularity of CBN and the captivity of the viewers by the
national network. He stated that his employees receive many, many complaints
from CBN viewers about the pre-empting of the CBN programs by the religious
access group. He explained that the religious access group has been allowed to
schedule programs at any time they desire and pointed out that there are two
public educational channels and Athena would not be receptive to moving anything
other than the lower education and upper education channels to the mid -band
channels.
es
Rc.,ular Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 15
Assistant City Attorney Doegey stated that this could be discussed with the
Cable Commission but stated that they had tried to explore every possibility but
they did not discuss the possibility of mid -bands.
Mr. Grimes expressed the opinion that the lower education channel, which is
not being utilized, could share a channel with upper education.
Mr. Doegey pointed out that there is so much local religious access
programming, they are almost to the point of activating another channel, and if
an additional channel is activated, it will have to be on the upper tier.
Council Member Kennedy stated that he thought that in the future the mid -
band is where the religious access programs need to be because the practice of
pre-empting is very bad.
No one else spoke in regard to this matter and Mayor Jones called for the
vote on the motion to refer the matter back to the Cable Commission for further
consideration and it passed as follows: Jones, Berlanga, Brown, Kennedy, Mendez
and Slavik voting, "Aye"; Guerrero and McComb voting, "No"; Turner, absent at
the time the vote was taken.
Noting the number of people who were present for
zoning cases, Council Member Guerrero made a motion
considered at this time.
The motion was seconded by Council Member Slavik
following vote: Jones, Guerrero and Slavik voting,
Brown, Kennedy, McComb and Mendez voting, "No".
the public hearing on the
that the zoning cases be
and failed to pass by the
"Aye"; Turner, Berlanga,
Mayor Jones called for consideration of the Consent Motions.
1. Authorizing a public hearing to be held on September 11, 1984, on the
closure request of a 25 foot wide street easement located in Lot 7, Block
1, Carroll Place Unit 7. This property is located on the north side of
Holly Road 400 feet west of the Carroll Lane intersection. The street
easement area is not improved or open on the ground.
2. Authorizing the issuance of a certificate of convenience and necessity for
the operation of a taxicab service by Mr. Gary J. Moore, doing business as
Robstown-5 Points Taxi.
Utes
...ular Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 16
3. Accepting the Meadow Park Recreation Center Expansion project and
authorizing final payment of $26,654.65 to B & B Builders for this 8th Year
Community Development Block Grant project. The total work done on this
project by B & B Builders is $96,086.46. The project provided for a 2,000
square foot expansion of the building, restroom renovation, kiln room
construction and other building improvements. A contract for this work was
originally awarded to La -Man Constructors in May, 1983, but the La -Man firm
defaulted on the work which was then completed by B & B Builders.
4. Approval of twelve months supply agreement, with option to extend for an
additional twelve months, at the same terms and conditions, subject to the
approval of the supplier and the City Manager, or his designee, for work
uniforms for labor and trades personnel to Uniforms Manufacturing, Inc.,
based on low bid, for an estimated annual expenditure of $70,375. Sixteen
bid invitations were issued and eleven bids were received.
Council Member Kennedy referred to item 2 and stated that it was his
understanding that some companies are not complying with their franchise
agreement with the City in that taxicabs are being sold and the City is not
receiving the fees due it.
City Manager Martin stated that it is very difficult to enforce the City's
ordinance pertaining to taxicabs because it addresses fees according to gross
receipts and it is difficult for the City to determine that amount. He stated
that it is an old system and he would like to go to a permit system for better
control.
5. Approve the purchase of fuel dispensing equipment for Maintenance Services
from C. C. Pump Service for the total amount of $14,651.64 based on low
bid. Fourteen bid invitations were issued and two bids were received.
6. Bids be received September 12, 1984, for twelve months supply agreement,
with option to extend for an additional twelve months, at the same terms
and conditions, subject to the approval of the supplier and the City
Manager, or his designee, for uniforms for the Police, School Crossing
Guards, and Airport Security Personnel.
7. Approving the plans and specifications for the George Evans School Area
Street Improvements, Phase II project, and that bids be received on
September 18, 1984. Streets included in this 9th Year Community
Development Block Grant project are as follows:
Howard, from Sam Rankin to Brownlee
Mestina, from Sam Rankin to Brownlee
Sam Rankin, from Caldwell to Comanche
Josephine, from Caldwell to IH -37 Access Road (Antelope)
Mexico, from Caldwell to IH -37 Access Road (Antelope)
:es
.. ,ular Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 17
8. Approving the following actions on the Spohn Hospital Area Street
Improvements, Phase II project:
a. The contractor's claim for additional compensation for the removal of
concrete base on Elizabeth Street between Santa Fe and Ocean Drive be
denied.
b. The contractor be granted a 33 day time extension due to utility
adjustments and delayed delivery of traffic signalization equipment to
supplement the 60 allotted working days, for a total allotted working
time of 93 days.
c. The project be accepted and remaining funds of $27,974.55 be
authorized to Howell Corporation & Isles Construction Company, a Joint
Venture.
This 8th Year Community Development Block Grant project provided for the
reconstruction of Elizabeth Street from Santa Fe to Ocean Drive and the
removal and replacement of driveways on Elizabeth Street from Santa Fe to
South Staples Street. The total work done on this project is $270,745.50.
Mayor Pro Tem Turner referred to item 8 (a) and inquired if the City has
established a precedent for dealing with contractors' claims.
Assistant City Manager James K. Lontos explained that the contractor can
file claims for anything that he feels is due him; the City Staff does not think
he has a rightful claim because the contract is clear that it is the
responsibility of the contractor to find out the condition of the job before
they submit bids.
Speaking in regard to the same item was Council Member Kennedy who stated
that he has received calls that the signs installed at Spohn Hospital are
illegal, and Mr. Larry Wenger of the Planning Department, concurs that they are.
City Manager Martin stated that this is being investigated.
Mayor Jones inquired about the status of the parking in front of Camp
Cleaners, and Mr. Jerry Smith, City Engineer, reviewed the circumstances
pertaining to this property owner on Elizabeth Street. He reminded the Council
that they had taken additional action to allow for the cleaners to have head -in
parking until January of 1986, at which time, the City Council will reconsider
the removal of the head -in parking and consider other options. He stated that
the property owner has still refused to sign the agreement even though it was
changed in accordance with their request.
.tes
9ular Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 18
City Manager Martin stated that he would suggest that we advise the owner
of Camp Cleaners, in writing, that this matter would be reconsidered in November
of 1984 since they have refused to sign the agreement.
Speaking from the audience was Mr. Ben Donnell, a member of the law firm
who is the representative for Camp Cleaners. He stated that he was not aware
that a response has not been provided the City from Camp Cleaners and he was not
aware that they had refused to sign an agreement, but he assured the Council
that he will check on this matter.
City Manager Martin suggested that the Council also consider at this time
the item listed on an emergency posting on the following item.
8.1. Delaying the receipt of bids on the McArdle Road Sanitary Sewer Sliplining,
Phase II Project until September 25, 1984. Bids were scheduled to be
received on August 28, 1984.
Mayor Jones called for comments from the audience on the Consent Motions.
Mr. Terry Moore, speaking in regard to item 2, stated that it was his
understanding that some of the other taxicab companies objected to his
establishing a new company. He stated that prior to consideration of this item,
he had discussed this with the other operators and they have reached an
agreement and he has concurred that he will keep his office and operation in the
Calallen-5 Points-Robstown Area, and will direct his adveritising only to that
area.
Mr. Victor Moreno, owner of Red Top Taxicab Company, explained to the
Council that there is a fear among taxicab owners in regard to opening new
companies. He explained that this is not controlling the size of the industry
and it is getting very difficult for the taxicab companies to make a profit.
Mayor Jones stated that he did not think that this Council or any other
Council should become involved in regulating private businesses because this is
not a function of government and he believed in the free enterprise system.
Council Member McComb concurred with the Mayor and related his personal
experience with the trucking industry which had been deregulated. He stated
that through this deregulation, competition has increased and better service is
the result. He stated that he did not think that Mr. Moreno's fears are based
on reality.
Mr. Pinky Eldridge, owner of Pinky's Taxicab Company, stated that he has
four taxicabs now so his business has grown, but expressed the opinion that
there should be some kind of control over the service and the appearance of the
drivers. He stated that he was of the opinion that Mr. Moore would abide by his
statement to operate in the 5 -Points Area only and stated that he, personally,
would like to have an inspector from the City to force all taxicab companies to
bring the taxicabs up to the proper level.
es
.lar Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 19
Council Member Slavik suggested that the taxicab companies form an
organization to police their own industry.
Mr. Tom Dunn addressed the Council on this issue and stated that he
operated a taxicab business in Alaska where the industry was very tightly
regulated with strict unions and he did not feel that there was a need for such
regulations. He stated that he felt that the individual companies should
perform a better job and they would consequently increase their business.
There were no further comments from the audience.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Turner that Consent Motions, items 1
through 8.1 be approved, seconded by Council Member Berlanga and passed
unanimously.
Mayor Jones called for consideration of the ordinances from the Consent
Agenda on items 9 through 20.
There were no comments from the audience or the Council on the ordinances;
City Secretary Read polled the Council for their votes; and the following
ordinances were passed:
9. ORDINANCE NO. 18413:
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 18036 BY AMENDING SECTION 3 IN ORDER TO ADOPT THE
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING STREETS:
Spohn Hospital Area, Phase II
Elizabeth Street, from South Staples to Ocean Drive;
AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the
following vote: Jones, Turner, Berlanga, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, McComb,
Mendez and Slavik voting, "Aye".
10. ORDINANCE N0. 18414:
APPROPRIATING $4,447.95 FROM THE NO. 162 FEDERAL/STATES GRANT FUND TO
SUPPLEMENT PREVIOUSLY APPROPRIATED FUNDS FOR FINAL CONSTRUCTION OF THE
SPOHN HOSPITAL AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, PHASE II; AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the
following vote: Jones, Turner, Berlanga, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, McComb,
Mendez and Slavik voting, "Aye".
.ate s
...;gular Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 20
11. ORDINANCE NO. 18415:
APPROPRIATING $20,000 FOR LEGAL FEES AND SERVICES ANTICIPATED AS A RESULT
OF THE McARDLE SLIPLINING LITIGATION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the
following vote: Jones, Turner, Berlanga, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, McComb,
Mendez and Slavik voting, "Aye".
12. ORDINANCE NO. 18416:
APPROPRIATING $4,500 from the no. 220 STREET BOND FUND FOR APPRAISAL
SERVICES BY SIDNEY H. SMITH, III IN CONNECTION WITH THE PURDUE ROAD STREET
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, PHASE II; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the
following vote: Jones, Turner, Berlanga, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, McComb,
Mendez and Slavik voting, "Aye".
13. ORDINANCE NO. 18417:
AUTHORIZING THE AMENDMENT TO AN AGREEMENT WITH HENRY TUCKER, DEVELOPER,
PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL SUBGRADE STABILIZATION TO CIMARRON BOULEVARD;
APPROPRIATING $8,305.04; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the
following vote: Jones, Turner, Berlanga, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, McComb,
Mendez and Slavik voting, "Aye".
14. ORDINANCE NO. 18418:
CLOSING AND ABANDONING A PORTION OF A 7.5 FOOT WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT OUT OF
LOT 21, BLOCK 103, HUNTERS POINT UNIT 2, SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS LISTED
BELOW; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the
following vote: Jones, Turner, Berlanga, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, McComb,
Mendez and Slavik voting, "Aye".
15. ORDINANCE NO. 18419:
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A RELEASE DOCUMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF VOIDING
THE PARK DEFERMENT CONTRACT FOR THE TOGAVILLE ACRES SUBDIVISION WHICH IS
BEING CHANGED FROM A MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION TO A MOBILE HOME PARK; AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the
following vote: Jones, Turner, Berlanga, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, McComb,
Mendez and Slavik voting, "Aye".
tes
filar Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 21
16. ORDINANCE NO. 18420:
APPROPRIATING $45,000 FOR THE PURCHASE OF A MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
AS PROVIDED FOR IN UMTA CAPITAL GRANT PROJECT TX -05-0073-01; AND DECLARING
AN EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the
following vote: Jones, Turner, Berlanga, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, McComb,
Mendez and Slavik voting, "Aye".
17. THIRD READING - ORDINANCE NO. 18421:
AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, SECTION 53-254, SCHEDULE V, INCREASE OF
STATE SPEED LIMIT IN CERTAIN ZONES, WHICH WILL CHANGE THE SPEED LIMIT ON
PORTIONS OF SOUTH PADRE ISLAND DRIVE, HORNE ROAD, ALAMEDA STREET, ENNIS
JOSLIN ROAD, VIOLET ROAD, AND McKINZIE ROAD; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY.
The foregoing ordinance was read for the third time and passed by the
following vote: Jones, Turner, Berlanga, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, McComb,
Mendez and Slavik voting, "Aye".
18. THIRD READING - ORDINANCE NO. 18422:
AMENDING SECTIONS 53-252, SCHEDULE III - PARKING PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMES ON
CERTAIN STREETS, AND 53-253, SCHEDULE IV - STOPPING, STANDING OR PARKING
DURING CERTAIN HOURS ON CERTAIN STREETS, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY
DELETING AND ADDING DIFFERENT STREET SECTIONS TO THE SCHEDULES; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION.
The foregoing ordinance was read for the third time and passed by the
following vote: Jones, Turner, Berlanga, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, McComb,
Mendez and Slavik voting, "Aye".
19. THIRD READING - ORDINANCE NO. 18423:
CLOSING AND ABANDONING THAT 235 FOOT LONG PORTION OF 50 FOOT WIDE ROBBY
DRIVE; RETAINING A 10 FOOT WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE EASTERN
BOUNDARY; PROVIDING FOR THE REPLAT OF SAID PROPERTY.
The foregoing ordinance was read for the third time and passed by the
following vote: Jones, Turner, Berlanga, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, McComb,
Mendez and Slavik voting, "Aye".
20. THIRD READING - ORDINANCE NO. 18424:
CLOSING AND ABANDONING THE SOUTH 20 FEET OF A 40 FOOT WIDE ROAD IN LOTS 12,
13, 20, 21, 28, 29, 36, 37, 44, AND 45, ARTEMUS ROBERTS SUBDIVISION;
RETAINING A UTILITY EASEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR THE REPLAT OF SAID PROPERTY.
utes
__gular Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 22
The foregoing ordinance was read for the third time and passed by the
following vote: Jones, Turner, Berlanga, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, McComb,
Mendez and Slavik voting, "Aye".
Mayor Jones called for consideration of the Actions by Motion on the
following items from the Regular Agenda.
21. Approving the recommendation of the Cable Commission which clarifies the
channel location of CBN and religious access channels. The Cable
Commission recommends that CBN remain on Channel 10 and that religious
access programming be located on Channel 29.
(This item was previously acted upon -- See page 15)
22. Authorizing the following actions be taken relative to correcting drainage
and erosion problems in Turkey Creek from Leopard Street to McKenzie Road:
a. A right-of-way acquisition map for this drainage project be approved
indicating that 47 separate drainage easements must be acquired for
future drainage improvements.
b. Necessary appraisal services be authorized along with the acquisition
of the 47 separate parcels of drainage easement in Turkey Creek for
this project.
c. Funds in the amount of $190,000 be appropriated (by separate
ordinance) to cover the cost of appraisal services and drainage
easement acquisition for the 47 parcels indicated.
This project is intended to correct severe erosion and drainage problems in
the Turkey Creek bed, to protect abutting properties, and to protect the
City's sanitary sewer trunk line from further damage. This easement
acquisition program will make the necessary drainage easements available to
construct future improvements which would be funded by other sources, such
as a future bond program.
Council Member Mendez referred to item 22 and stated that he had brought up
this drainage and errosion problem when he first became a Member of the City
Council. He stated that he wanted to commend the Staff for their work on this
problem. He then inquired if there were any proposals for the northern portion
that runs through Turkey Creek.
Assistant City Manager Lontos stated that they are considering that section
but it is not included in this particular recommendation. He explained that
this is the first phase to identify which rights-of-way are needed for
acquisition.
tes
filar Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 23
Mayor Jones inquired if this is something that the developers should have
taken care of at the time the area was developed, and Council Member Mendez
stated that most of it was developed before it was annexed. He stated that he
had suggested that the property owners donate some of the right-of-way to
improve the drainage situation there.
A motion was made by Council Member Mendez that item 22 be approved,
seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Turner and passed unanimously.
Mayor Jones then called for consideration of Actions by Ordinance on the
Regular Agenda on items 23 through 25.
City Manager Martin stated that he would like to amend item 24 which allows
for a waiver of the $25 fee charged by Municipal Court for the issuance of a
warrant and change the effective date to read between August 22, 1984 and
October 15, 1984 so that it will be effective immediately.
In a related matter to Ordinance No. 25 pertaining to Water Conservation,
City Manager Martin presented to the Council copies of the notices that will be
sent to all residential utility customers which also includes a card for them to
mail in indicating the number of residents in their homes. He stated that if a
utility customer has college students, they cannot be counted as residents
unless they are residing in the home all month.
Council Member Brown inquired as to how it can be determined that people
are honest in completing their form, and City Manager Martin stated that it is
on an honor system and he thought that basically most people will be honest
about it. He assured the Council that all of the meters in the City will be
read before the allocation is placed in effect but some people will not have
their meters read until September 24, and their allocation period will start
after that date.
There were no comments from the audience on these ordinances.
City Secretary Read polled the Council for their votes and the following
ordinances were passed:
23. ORDINANCE NO. 18425:
APPROPRIATING $190,000 FROM THE NO. 295 STORM SEWER BOND FUND FOR APPRAISAL
SERVICES AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT ACQUISITION OF 47 SEPARATE PARCELS ALONG
TURKEY CREEK FROM McKENZIE ROAD TO LEOPARD STREET; AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the
following vote: Jones, Berlanga, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, McComb, Mendez
and Slavik voting, "Aye", Turner, absent at the time the vote was taken.
tes
yular Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 24
24. ORDINANCE NO. 18426:
AMENDING CHAPTER 29, MUNICIPAL COURTS, SECTION 29-18, SAME -- RESETTING OF
CASE, OF THE CITY CODE BY WAIVING THE $25 FEE CHARGED FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A
WARRANT OF ARREST TO ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO VOLUNTARILY COMES TO MUNICIPAL
COURT AND PAYS, DURING THE PERIOD FROM AUGUST 22, 1984 THROUGH OCTOBER 15,
1984, AN OUTSTANDING FINE ON A COMPLAINT FOR WHICH A WARRANT HAS BEEN
ISSUED; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the
following vote: Jones, Berlanga, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, McComb, Mendez
and Slavik voting, "Aye", Turner, absent at the time the vote was taken.
25. ORDINANCE NO. 18427:
AMENDING CHAPTER 55, ARTICLE XII, WATER CONSERVATION, OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, SECTION 55-152, TO PROVIDE FOR
ALTERNATE MEMBERS OF THE ALLOCATION AND REVIEW COMMITTEE; AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the
following vote: Jones, Berlanga, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, McComb, Mendez
and Slavik voting, "Aye", Turner, absent at the time the vote was taken.
Mayor Jones announced the public hearings on four zoning applications.
26. Application No. 784-12, Corpus Christi Independent School District: for a
change of zoning from "R -1B" One -family Dwelling District to "B-1"
Neighborhood Business District on a tract of land being 4.90± acres out of
Lots 29 and 30, Section 14, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts,
located on the northeast corner of Airline and McArdle Roads.
Assistant City Manager Tom Utter informed the Council that in response to
the twenty-eight notices of the public hearing, two in favor and two in
opposition had been returned and that both the Planning Commission and Planning
Staff recommend approval.
Mayor Jones ascertained that no one in the audience wished to speak in
regard to this zoning application.
A motion was made by Council Member Kennedy that the hearing be closed,
seconded by Council Member Guerrero and passed unanimously.
In the temporary absence of the City Secretary, Assistant City Secretary
Dorothy Zahn polled the Council for their votes on the ordinance and the
following ordinance effecting the zoning change passed:
to s
..lar Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 25
26. ORDINANCE NO. 18428:
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF CORPUS CHRISTI
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN REFERENCE TO A
PORTION OUT OF LOTS 29 AND 30, SECTION 14, FLOUR BLUFF AND ENCINAL FARM AND
GARDEN TRACTS, FROM "R -1B" ONE -FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO "B-1"
NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the
following vote: Jones, Turner, Berlanga, Brown, Guerrero, Kennedy, McComb
and Slavik voting, "Aye"; Mendez, absent at the time the vote was taken.
* * * * * * * *
27. Application No. 684-12, Driscoll Foundation Children's Hospital: for a
change of zoning from "R -1B" One -family Dwelling District to "B-4" General
Business District on Tract 1 and to "I-3" Heavy Industrial District on
Tract 2, Tract 1 being 16.090± acres and Tract 2 being 0.2296± acre, both
Tracts out of Tract 1, Hospital Tracts Subdivision, located on the west
side of S. Alameda Street, approximately 125' north of Stirman Street.
Mr. Utter informed the Council that in response to the fifty-nine notices
of the public hearing, seven in favor, two in opposition and one in opposition
from outside the area of notification had been received. He stated that both
the Planning Commission and Planning Staff recommend approval of "B-4" zoning on
Tract 1 but denial of "I-3 on Tract 2 and in lieu thereof, that a special permit
be approved for a helipad subject to an acceptable site plan.
Mr. Utter stated that the applicant has submitted an acceptable site plan
that is acceptable to grant a special permit for Tract 2 and the representatives
of the hospital concur with the special permit.
Mr. Larry Wenger, Director of Planning, located the area on the zoning and
land use map, described the land use in the surrounding area, explained the
location of the two tracts, noting that expansion of the hospital and parking
lot will be on Tract 1 and there will be a helipad located on Tract 2.
Mayor Jones stated that he has some reservations in having a helipad
located so close to a busy street.
Mr. Wenger explained that it will be located behind a fence and a hedge;
they plan to add some additional storage on to the building; and the helipad
must be a certain distance away from the building itself. He stated that this
has been reviewed by the Airport Manager and FAA who have approved it. He
assured the Council that the helipad will be used very seldom because it will
only be utilized on an emergency basis.
No one spoke in regard to this zoning case.
rtes
.__gular Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 26
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Turner that the hearing be closed,
seconded by Council Member Brown and passed unanimously.
City Secretary Read polled the Council for their vote effecting the zoning
change and it passed as follows:
27. ORDINANCE NO. 18429:
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF DRISCOLL FOUNDATION
CHILDRENS' HOSPITAL BY CHANGING THE ZONING IN REFERENCE TO TRACT 1,
HOSPITAL TRACTS SUBDIVISION, FROM "R -1B" ONE -FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO
"B-4" GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AND BY GRANTING A SPECIAL COUNCIL PERMIT
FOR A HELIPAD ON A PORTION OF TRACT 1, HOSPITAL TRACTS SUBDIVISION; AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the foregoing ordinance passed by the
following vote: Jones, Turner, Berlanga, Brown, Kennedy, McComb, Mendez
and Slavik voting, "Aye"; Guerrero, absent at the time the vote was taken.
* * * * * * * *
28. Application No. 784-10, Mr. Mohammad Mojallali: for a change of zoning
from "R -1B" One -family Dwelling District to "A-1" Apartment House District
on Lots 3C and 3D, Block 1, J. N. Laughlin Addition, located on the south
side of Houston Street, approximately 600' east of Kostoryz Road.
Mr. Utter stated that in response to the twenty notices of the public
hearing, none in favor, eight in opposition and one additional letter of
opposition from outside the area of notification had been returned. He stated
that both the Planning Commission and Planning Staff recommend that it be denied
and in lieu thereof, that "R-2" zoning be granted. He stated that the
opposition was sufficient to invoke the 20% rule.
Mr. Wenger located the area on the zoning and land use map, described the
land use in the surrounding area and showed slides of the vicinity.
Mayor Pro Tem Turner stated that she is familiar with the area and she is
surprised that the Planning Commission and Planning Staff recommend "R-2" when
this is a single-family dwelling area. She expressed the opinion that if it is
approved, additional requests will be forthcoming.
Mr. Wenger stated that the Staff is of the opinion that the "R-2" zoning
would provide a buffer between the existing "A-2" density and the "R -1B" area.
Mayor Jones called on the applicant or his representative to speak.
:e s
2. _lar Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 27
Mr. Tom Dunham, 3221 South Staples Street #2, stated that this property was
purchased because it was located on a corner and he was of the opinion that the
proposed use would be a great improvement over the existing use. He explained
that they plan to construct nine units on these lots, but if "R-2" zoning is
granted, they would construct seven units which will be in compliance with that
zoning.
Mr. George Anastos, 3301 Houston Street, read a petition expressing
opposition to this request. He read the names of the people who had signed the
petition and stated that they are all opposed to any further development because
of their objection to the existing apartments and the fact that Houston Street
is narrow and has become burdened with the apartment development traffic. He
stated that the petition had been signed by six residents of the area.
Also speaking in opposition to the request was Mr. Ben Johnson, 3302 Kay
Street.
Mr. Utter pointed out to those in opposition that if "A-1" zoning were
approved, the applicant could construct eleven units but "R-2" zoning would just
allow seven units.
Mrs. Cenovia De La Garza, 3305 Houston Street, explained that the residents
are already overcrowded and they have lived there for many years. She stated
that because of the existence of apartments, they no longer have any privacy.
Council Member Slavik asked about the dimension of the the lots and Mr.
Utter stated that it is 100' by 208'.
Also speaking in opposition to multi -family dwellings was Mr. Joe M.
Ascension, 3242 Houston Street. He stated that there are a lot of children in
the neighborhood and additional apartments would just generate more traffic.
No one else spoke in regard to this zoning application.
A motion was made by Council Member Kennedy that the hearing be closed,
seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Turner and passed unanimously.
City Secretary Read polled the Council for their votes on the ordinance
effecting the zoning change and the following ordinance failed to pass:
28. ORDINANCE (Failed to Pass)
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF MOHAMMAD MOJALLALI, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN REFERENCE TO LOTS 3C AND 3D, BLOCK !, J. N.
LAUGHLIN ADDITION, FROM "R -1B" ONE -FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO "R-2"
MULTIPLE DWELLING DISTRICT; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The Charter Rule was suspended and the following ordinance failed to pass
by the following vote: Jones, Guerrero, McComb, Mendez and Slavik voting,
"Aye"; Turner, Berlanga, Brown and Kennedy voting, "no".
ltes
__gular Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 28
City Secretary Read informed the Council that the ordinance failed to pass
because it did not receive a sufficient number of votes since the 20% rule was
in effect which requires seven affirmative votes to approve.
29. Application No. 784-11, Mr. and Mrs. Lauro M. Cuellar: for a change of
zoning from "R-2" Multiple Dwelling District to "B-1" Neighborhood Business
District on Lot 13, Block 38, Southside Addition No. 4, located on the west
side of Kostoryz Road, approximately 62' north of McArdle Road.
Mr. Utter informed the Council that in response to the twenty-four notices
of the public hearing, four in favor and four in opposition had been returned
and that the Planning Commission recommends denial but the Planning Staff
recommends denial of "B-1" zoning but in lieu thereof, that "AB" zoning be
granted. He stated that the "AB" zoning is acceptable to the applicant and that
the 20% rule is in effect.
Mr. Wenger located the area on the zoning and land use map, described the
land use in the surrounding area and showed slides of the vicinity. He stated
that the applicant plans the establishment of an insurance office if the zoning
is approved.
Council Member Slavik asked why the Staff recommended "AB" zoning, and Mr.
Wenger explained that it is across the street from "8-1" and "B-3" zoning and
further to the north is also located business zoning. He stated that this is
the only area that is not commercial on Kostoryz and the Staff is of the opinion
that this would be good transition zoning.
Mayor Pro Tem Turner stated that if this application is approved,
unquestionably the entire area will be zoned "AB".
Mr. Wenger stated that that is the Staff's opinion as well and the Staff
would not have recommended "AB" zoning if the business zoning were not already
located across the street.
Council Member Berlanga informed the Council that the property owner next
door to the subject property indicated to him that he, too, would like to have
this zoning on his property because he felt that eventually, all of the
properties will be zoned "AB".
Mr. Wenger stated that the Staff did not recommend approval of "8-1" zoning
because of the excess of business use on Kostoryz and the fact that vehicles
will have to back out into Kostoryz to gain access to the street.
Mayor Jones called on the applicant or his representative to speak at this
time.
tes
_ ,alar Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 29
Mr. Jack Keith, 4833 Monica, spoke in favor of the change of zoning. He
presented to the Council copies of the plat showing their plans for parking and
the location of the structure. He pointed out that most of the houses in the
area are rent houses and only two are owner -occupied. He expressed the opinion
that their site plan shows a good parking plan.
Council Member Guerrero stated that this is located near his residence and
he would like to see the area rezoned and he would support "B-1" zoning.
Mr. Keith then pointed out the location of the owner -occupied houses.
Mr. Lauro Cuellar, the applicant, addressed the Council and stated that he
plans to remodel the existing building to serve as an insurance office and he
was of the opinion that there will be plenty of area for parking. Mr. Cuellar
also stated that he was of the opinion that the property would be improved if he
does establish his insurance office.
Mr. Utter stated the Staff's initial review of the site plan indicates that
their plan meets the requirement of "AB" zoning.
Mr. Jimmy Aldridge, 4825 Kostoryz, stated that he has problems keeping
renters in his rent house due to the heavy traffic. He stated that there are
two houses that are well kept but the other houses are in a rundown condition.
He expressed the opinion that everything in the 4800 block should be rezoned
"B-1" and he is in favor of the change of zoning.
Mayor Pro Tem Turner suggested that all of the property owners should be
consulted to see if they would like to have their lots rezoned "B-1".
Mr. Utter agreed that this could be done and if all of the property owners
agree, the Staff could initiate the zoning application.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Turner that the hearing be closed,
seconded by Council Member Mendez and passed unanimously.
A motion was made by Mayor pro Tem Turner that the requested zoning of
"B-1" be denied but in lieu thereof, that "AB" zoning be approved.
The motion was seconded by Council Member Guerrero.
Council Member Kennedy stated that he would like to direct the Staff to go
ahead and contact the property owners to see if they would be interested in
having their property rezoned.
The motion to approve the "AB" zoning passed unanimously.
utes
gular Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 30
City Manager Martin stated that he would like to have Director of Finance
Charles Daley in the Council Chamber next week to recognize his achievement in
obtaining a Certificate of Conformance from Governor Finance Officers'
Association.
City Manager Martin then referred to a memorandum placed on the Council
Table to inform them that Emerald Airlines has announced bankruptcy as of that
morning. He stated that they owe the City of Corpus Christi about $30,000 which
the City may not be able to collect.
City Manager Martin also informed the City Council that Mr. Roger Pearson,
Director of Libraries, has announced his resignation effective at the end of
September. He stated that Mr. Pearson plans to take a position in the Chicago,
Illinois area. He also stated that in their packets was an engineer's report on
Exposition Hall and noted that there is a need to work out timetables and
discuss other options in connection with that building. He stated that he felt
that that building should be demolished as soon as possible.
City Manager Martin stated that since it was so late, the personnel matter
listed on the agenda can be delayed until the following week. Mr. Martin also
informed the Council that the Ad Hoc Water Commission would like to make a
report to them the following week and he then briefly explained the water
situation and the possibility of alternative sources.
Mayor Jones called for petitions or information from the audience on
matters not listed on the agenda.
Mr. Calvin Floyd addressed the Council and stated that wells could be
drilled at Flour Bluff at a cost of $35,000 per well. He stated that it is good
water but it has to be treated before it goes into the City lines.
Mayor Jones thanked him and stated that the City already has those types of
things under consideration.
Mr. Frank Dietz, representing the Greens Industry Association, expressed
concern about the wastewater distribution system. He expressed the opinion that
it should be expanded because long lines are again forming at the Oso Plant to
pick up effluent, particularly since there have been no rains this week. He
stated that they would still like to have the Council pass a motion or an
ordinance to provide for regulations and to provide funds for additional pickup
points.
City Manager Martin stated that the City can install two additional pickup
stations without performing necessary road work and the City Council could
authorize charges for the system, either at the source or at some central office
on a weekly or annual basis.
Council Member Guerrero agreed, stating that he felt that the matter should
be removed from the table to consider installation of the additional pickup
stations and the necessary permit fees.
:es
,.:lar Council Meeting
August 21, 1984
Page 31
A motion was made by Council Member McComb that this matter be removed from
the table for consideration next week, seconded by Council Member Guerrero and
passed unanimously.
Mr. Guerrero explained that he would like to have this on the agenda next
week with a proposal to install the additional pickup stations.
There being no further business to come before the Council, on motion by
Council Member Mendez, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Turner and passed unanimously,
the Regular Council Meeting was adjourned at 10:22 p.m., August 21, 1984.
DZ/rr