HomeMy WebLinkAbout09579 ORD - 12/17/1969rr
AN ORDINANCE
k
CLOSING THE HEARING GIVEN TO THE REAL AND TRUE OMNERS
OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE HEREINAFTER NAMED STREETS
IN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, TO -WIT:
1. ALAMEDA STREET, WEST SIDE ONLY, FROM HANCOCK TO
AGNES STREET;
2. BROWNLEE BOULEVARD, WEST SIDE ONLY, BUFORD TO AGNES,
EXCEPT LOT 18, BLOCK 15, CHAMBERLIN ADDITION;
4. CHICO, LAST SIDE ONLY, HOWARD TO COMANCHE;
fi HowARo, NORTH SIDE ONLY, CIIICO TO 19TH;
5. CLARK, NORTON TO NORMANDY, BOTH SIDES;
6. NORTON, SOUTH SIDE ONLY, NAPLES TO RAMSEY;
NAPLES, NORTHWEST SIDE ONLY, SHELY TO NORTON;
MCARDLE ROAD, SOUTH SIDE ONLY, RODo FIELD ROAD TO
NILE DRIVE;
9. RUTH, SOUTH SIDE ONLY, TWENTY - SECOND TO TWENTY- FIFTH;
10. SANTA FE, WEST SIDE ONLY, CRAIG TO MORGAN;
11• WEIL PLACE, EAST SIDE ONLY, KENWOOD DRIVE TO TEXAS- MEXICAN
RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY;
12. MCARDLE ROAD, NORTH SIDE ONLY, NESBITT TO JOHNSTON;
13. SHIRLEY DRIVE, EAST SIDE ONLY, ABUTTING WEST SIDE OF
LOTS 1 AND 26, BLOCK �F, PRESCOTT PARK;
14. KAREN DRIVE, SOUTH SIDE ONLY, AUBTTING NORTH SIDE OF
LOT 1, BLOC:< 5, PRESCOTT PARK; AND
15. JOHN JONES PARK;
AND FI MDJ KG AND DI7TEPMI LN nlr TIaAT Ppnnrnry AB ITT.t AIG SA 1 n_
LOCATIONS WILL BE SPECIFICALLY BENEFITTED AND ENHANCED
IN VALUE IN EXCESS OF COST OF IMPROVEMENTS, AND LEVYING
AN ASSESSMENT FOR PAYMENT; FIXING A CHARGE AND LIEN, THE
MANNER AND TIME OF PAYMENT AND COLLECTION; AND DECLARING
AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, THE CITY COUNCIL OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, BY DULY
ENACTED ORDINANCE PASSED AND APPROVED ON NOVEMBER 12, 1969, DETERMINED THE
NECESSITY FOR AND ORDERED THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE AFORESAID STREETS BY
THE CONSTRUCTION, RECONSTRUCTION, REPAIRING OR REALIGNING OF `CONCRETE /y
SIDEWALKS, IN THE MANNER AND ACCORDING TO THE PLANSrAND SPECIFICATIONS /
HERETOFORE APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL BY ORDINANCE DATT b
NOVEMBER 12, 1969, A DULY EXI?CUTED•NOTICE OF SAID ORDINANCg HAVING BEEN
FILED IN THEONAME OF SAID CITY WITH THE COUNTY CLERK'fOF NUECES COUNTY,
TEXAS; AND rk
WHEREAS, SAID CITY COUNCIL Of" THE CITY OF CORPLIS CHRISTI, AFTER
r
RAVING ADVERTISED FOR AND RECEIVED BIDS ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID IMPROVE-
MENTS FOR THE LENGTH OF T114C AND IN THE MANNER AIJD FORM AS REQUIRED BY THE
CHARTER OF THE CITY AND THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, AND HAVING DULY
AND REGULARLY MADE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR SUCH PURPOSE TO
COVER THE ESTIMATED COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID CITY, ALL AS PROVIDE ,.
BY THE CORPUS CHRISTI CI1Y CHARTER AND BY LAW, DID AWARD C014TRACT FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS TO FOWCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, THEIR
`
9590 ,
BID BEING THE LOWEST AND MOST ADVANTAGEOUS TO TI1E CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
SAID BID HAVING BEEN OPENED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON NOVEMBER 5, 1969,
AND SAID CONTRACT BEING HERETOFORE DULY EXECUTED BYSAID CITY AND FOWCO
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, DATED AND THE PERFORMANCE
BOND REQUIRED BY SAID CONTRACT HAS BEEN PROPERLY FURNISHED BY SAID FOWCO
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY AS TO
FORM AND AMOUNT AS REQUIRED BY THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY AND THE LAWS OF
THE STATE OF TEXAS; AND
WHEREAS, THE SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS CAUSED THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
WORKS TO PREPARE AND FILE EST114ATES OF THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS
AND ESTIMATES OF THE AMOUNTS'- ., TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE PROPERTY
ABUTTING SAID SIDCWALKS AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND SAID
DIRECTOR,OF PUBLIC WORKS HAS HERETOFORE FILED SAID ESTIMATES AND A STATE-
MENT OF OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO WITH SAID CITY COUNCIL, AND SAME
HAS BEEN RECEIVED, EXAMINED AND APPROVED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL; AND ,
WEREAS, SAID CITY COUNCIL, BY DULY ENACTED ORDINANCE DATED
NOVEMBER 12, 1969, DID DETER14INE THEINECESSITY OF LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT
OF THAT PORTION OF THE COST OF CONSTRUCTING SAID IMPROVEMENTS ON THE ABOVE -
NAMED STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS IIERE114 DEFINED, TO BE PAID BY THE ABUTTING
PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OW14ERS THEREOF, AND BY ORDINANCE DATED
NOVEMBER 12, 1969 DID ORDER AND SET A HEARING TO BE HELD AT 3:00 O'CLOCK
ON DECEMBER 10, 1969, 114 THE COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CITY HALL OF CORPUS
CHRISTI, TEXAS, FOR THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON
SAID STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS ABOVE DEFINED, AND FOR ALL OTHERS OWNING
OR CLAIMING ANY INTEREST IN, OR OTHERWISE INTERESTED IN SAID PROPERTY,
OR ANY OF SAID MATTERS AS TO THE ASSESSMENTS AND AMOUNTS TO BE ASSESSED
AGAINST EACH PARCEL OF ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR
OWNERS THEREOF, AND AS TO THE SPECIAL BENEFITS TO ACCRUE TO SAID ABUTTING
PROPERTY BY VIRTUE OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS, IF ANY, OR CONCERNING ANY ERROR,
INVALIDITY, IRREGULARITY OR DEFICIENCY IN ANY PROCEEDINGS, OR CONTRACT,
TO APPEAR AND BE HEARD IN PERSON OR BY COUNSEL AND OFFER EVIDENCE IN
REFERENCE TO SAID MATTERS; AND THE CITY COUNCIL DID BY SAID ORDINANCE ORDER
AND DIRECT THE CITY TO GIVE NOTICE OF SAID HEARING TO THE OWNERS ABUTTING
UPON SAID STREETS AS SHOWN BY THE CURRENT AD VALOREM TAX ROLL BY MAILING
SUCH NOTICE TO SUCH OWNERS AND PUBLISHING SAID NOTICE AT LEAST THREE
TIMES IN THE CORPUS CHRISTI TIMES BEFORE THC DATE OF THE HEARING, SUCH
NOTICE BY MAIL AND BY PUBLICATION BEING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS
OF ARTICLE 1105B OF VERNON'S ANNOTATED CIVIL STATUTES OF TEXAS; AND
WHEREAS, SUCH NOTICE WAS GIVE14 SAID OWNERS OF PROPERTY AS SHOWN
ON THE CURRENT AD VALOREM TAX ROLL WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE STREETS BEING
IMPROVED BY MAILING SUCH NOTICE A7 LEAST FOURTEEN (14) DAYS PRIOR TO TI1E
HEARING TO SUCH OWNERS AND BY PUBLISHING THREE TIMES NOTICE OF SUCH HEAR-
ING IN THE CORPUS CHRISTI TIMES, THE FIRST OF WHICH PUBLICATIONIAS AT
LEAST TWENTY -ONE (21) DAUS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF SAID HEARING; BOTH FORMS
OF NOTICE BEING IN COMPLIANCE WITH AND CONTAIN114G THE INFORMATION REQUIRED
BY ARTICLE 1105B, VERNON'S ANNOTATED CIVIL STATUTES; AND
WHEREAS, AFTER DUE, REGULAR AND PROPER NOTICE THEREOF, ALL AS
PROVIDED -BY LAID AND THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, SAID HEARING
OF WHICH NOTICE WAS GIVEN, WAS OPENED AND HELD ON DECEMBER 10, 1g6g, IN
THE COUNCIL CHAMBER AT CITY HALL IN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SAID ORDINANCE AND NOTICE, AT WHICH TIME AN OPPORTUNITY
WAS GIVEN TO ALL SAID ABOVE - MENTIONED PERSONS, FIRMS, CORPORATIONS AND
ESTATES, THEIR AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS, TO BE HEARD AND TO OFFER EVIDE14CE
AS TO ALL MATTERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID ORDINANCE AND NOTICE, AT WHICH
TIME THE FOLLOWING APPEARED AND OFFERED THE FOLLOWING TESTIMONY:
-3-
Mayor Pro Tern Lozano reconvened the meeting at 3:00 p.m., directed that it be noted 4
that a quorum was present, and announced the Council would hold th&public hearing scheduled
on assessments for the proposed Sidewalk Improvements, Unit V, consisting of construction of
concrete and shell sidewalks in portions of the following streets: (1) Alameda Street, from Hancock
to Agnes; (2) Brownlee Boulevard, Buford to Agnes; (3) Chico, Howard to Commanche; (4) Howard,
Chico to 19th; (5) Clark, Norton to 150' east; (6) Norton, Naples to Ramsey; (7) Naples, Shely
to Norton; (8) McArdle Road, Rodd Field to Nile Drive; (9) Ruth, 22nd to 25th; (10) Santa Fe,
Craig to Morgan; (11) Weil Place; (12) McArdle Road, Nesbitt to Johnston; (13) Shirley Drive;
(14) Karen Drive; and (15) John Jones Park. He stated that Assistant City Attorney Amador Garcia
would conduct the hearing.
Mr. Garcia explained the purpose of the public hearing and stated the Staff would offer
testimony from the City Engineer, and evaluation testimony from a real estate` appraiser to sub-
stantiate the assessments which appear on the Preliminary Assessment Roll, and stated that the
s _
Mayor Pro Tern Lozano reconvened the meeting at 3:00 p.m., directed that it be noted 4
that a quorum was present, and announced the Council would hold th&public hearing scheduled
on assessments for the proposed Sidewalk Improvements, Unit V, consisting of construction of
concrete and shell sidewalks in portions of the following streets: (1) Alameda Street, from Hancock
to Agnes; (2) Brownlee Boulevard, Buford to Agnes; (3) Chico, Howard to Commanche; (4) Howard,
Chico to 19th; (5) Clark, Norton to 150' east; (6) Norton, Naples to Ramsey; (7) Naples, Shely
to Norton; (8) McArdle Road, Rodd Field to Nile Drive; (9) Ruth, 22nd to 25th; (10) Santa Fe,
Craig to Morgan; (11) Weil Place; (12) McArdle Road, Nesbitt to Johnston; (13) Shirley Drive;
(14) Karen Drive; and (15) John Jones Park. He stated that Assistant City Attorney Amador Garcia
would conduct the hearing.
Mr. Garcia explained the purpose of the public hearing and stated the Staff would offer
testimony from the City Engineer, and evaluation testimony from a real estate` appraiser to sub-
stantiate the assessments which appear on the Preliminary Assessment Roll, and stated that the
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 10, 1969
Page 5
hearing was to form a basis on which the Council, acting as a legislative body, would determine
or establish the assessments on the abutting properties.
Mr. James K. Lantos, First Assistant Director of Public Works, presented and plans and
specifications for the proposed sidewalk improvements and explained they are part of a proposed
project designed to provide access to several schools in the City. He described the nature, extent,
and specifications of the proposed sidewalks, and stated these plans and specifications were prepared
in his office under his supervision. He explained that the sidewalks proposed are to be four feet in
" t
width with the exception of two streets where they will be five feet in width. He stated that the
r
total contract price, based on the recent assessment policy adopted by the Council, is $47,533.20;
total assessment to property owners is $22,557.78, and that the total cost to the City is $24,975.42;
and explained the manner in which the pro rata share was computed. He stated a problem has
arisen as to placement of the sidewalk on Norton Street where huge palm trees exist along the
curb; that letters have been received from the property owners requesting that the sidewalk be
four feet in width and placed against the curb, in which case the palm trees would have to be
removed; that as an alternative it had been suggested that the necessary easement be obtained
from the property owners and that the sidewalk be placed back of the trees and narrowed to three
and one -half feet, and that the proper adjustments be made in the rates. .
Mr. Harold Carr, real estate appraiser, testified as to his background and experience which
i
he felt qualified him as a real estate appraiser for all types of property in the City; stated he had
personally viewed and understood the extent and specifications of the proposed improvements; that
he had personally viewed the preliminary assessment roll and each of the properties to be assessed;
and stated that in his opinion, each of the properties so assessed would be enhanced in value at
least to the extend of the proposed assessments, and that he does not recommend on adjustment
on any single piece of property.
Mayor Pro Tem Lozano gave property owners in the audience an opportunity to state his
approval or objection to any of the proposed sidewalks or assessments to his property. The
following persons appeared:
0
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 10, 1969
Page 6
Item #47 - John R. Thomas, Lots 4, 5, 6, and 7, Block 9, Bayview Addition -
Mr. Charles Hale, attorney representing Mrs. John R. Thomas and her three daughters, stated
the notice appeared to be improper because the property had been described as being located on
Clark Street, but stated he would stipulate that the described as correct. He stated his clients
were vigorously opposed to the construction of the proposed sidewalks from Craig to Buford on
the basis there are no school children, and no need for them since there is no pedestrian traffic;
that Mrs. Thomas is a 90 -year old invalid widow confined to her bedroom, and that the proposed
sidewalk construction would be within a few feet of her bedroom window which would be a
nuisance and an injustice. He pointed out that the City had allowed business zoning in this
area which does not necessitate construction of sidewalks; that his clients are willing to have
the shrubs removed if they are objectionable, and that they are opposed on the basis the improve-
ments would not benefit.
Mrs. Otis Bowers, daughter of Mrs. Thomas, spoke on her behalf concurring in the
statements made by Mr. Hale, and pointed out that sidewalks exist on the other side of the street
all the way to Del Mar with the exception of an area in front of two buildings; that there is no
bus stop, and that she feels the proposed sidewalks are useless.
Mr. Carr stated that he had studied this particular property and that it was his opinion
that sidewalks at this location would definitely benefit the area, pointing out that the property
being used as a residence is not the highest and best use of the property.
Items 0143 and 4144 - Alfred Mayorga, Lot 35, Block 1, and Lot 34, Block 1, Loma Alta
Addition: Mr. Mayorga inquired as to whether or not driveways had been included in the con-
struction. He was advised that they were not included and that if he desired ±driveways he should
make arrangements with the contractor, and that credit would be allowed for driveway cuts.
Item 1147 - Felipe Villa, Lot 31, Block 1, Loma Alta Addition: Alfred Mayorga spoke
as interpreter for Mr. Villa and inquired as to how the payments are to be made.
Item 012 - First Free Methodist Church, Lot 12, Block 12, Southmoreland Subdivision:
Reverend Smith appeared as representative of the church and stated the members are opposed to the
sidewalks on the basis that they already have sidewalks in front of the church, and that another one
would only clutter up their head -in parking and create a hazard by cars having to cross the sidewalk
,L
into their parking area.
r »
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 10, 1969
Page 7
Item 022,1. H. Lester, Lot 20, Block 15, Arcadia Village: Mrs.. Lester stated she was
not opposed to the sidewalks but that she was opposed to the 4 -foot easement proposed between
the curb and the sidewalk, which would cut down the depth of her front yard and necessitate
destruction of her palm trees. She suggested that the sidewalks be located between the palm
trees and the curb.
Item 015 - B. L. Miller, Lot 13, Block 15, Arcadia Village: Mrs. Edna Miller stated
she was heartily in favor of the sidewalks, but that she could not understand why the City per-
mitted that subdivision to be deve'l,oped without sidewalks in the first place which is penalizing
the residents at this time. She stated she would be willing to sacrifice the palm trees if the plans
could be modified to construct the sidewalk next to the curb.
City Manager Townsend reported that letters had been received from three other residents
in this area requesting that the sidewalk on this street be placed next to the curb. The letters
were signed by Thelma Doughty, Cora Atkins, and C. O. Ward.
Item 035 - Mrs. Lena Williams, Lot 1, Block 16, Arcadia Village: Mrs. - Williams stated
she was opposed to the sidewalk on the basis it would decrease the size of her yard; would
destroy the only Retama tree in the entire neighborhood; would be too close to her bedroom
window; and that she does not feel the school children would use the sidewalk.
Mr. Lontos stated the assessment had been reduced fifty percent because this property
sides onto the street; and that it will be investigated further and a recommendation submitted.
Item 018 - Martin Flores, Lot 16, Block 15, Arcadia Village: Mr. Flores stated he was
not opposed to the sidewalk nor the assessment, but objected to the eight -foot reduction in the
size of his property, and stated the sidewalk would be too close to his house.
Item 030 - F. A. Voelkel, Lot 21, Block 19, Arcadia Village: Mr. Hamricks stated that
if the sidewalk is going to be imposed upon him, -he would like to request that they be placed
next to the curb.
Items 052, 53, 54, 56 - Carrol I Jones Company, Lots 12 and Lot 1, Block 4; Lot 1 and 24,
Block 3; and Lot 10, Block 2, all in Heritage Park 01: Mr. Phil Jones appeared and stated he
was opposed to being asked to pay for sidewalks located on the opposite side of the street; that
he felt they should be constructed on both sides of the street; and inquired if the individual
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
December 10, 1969
Page 8
owners could contract for the construction if they desired and found it could be done more
economically.
City Manager Townsend stated this would not be feasible since the contract had been
awarded for the total project, and would be too complex. He explained that the School System
officials had been consulted as to which side of the streets was most desirable for location of
the sidewalk, and also a factor which was taken into consideration was the side of the street
which has the greater number of houses, and which has the most intersections to be served by
the sidewalks.
Mr. Townsend stated that the Staff would review each and every one of -the requests.
No one else appeared to be heard in connection with the proposed sidewalk construction.
Motion by Bradley, seconded by McDaniel and passed, that the hearing be closed and
tabled for further study.
There being no further,business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned.
THERE nCING NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT WHO DESIRED TO BE t1EARO, THE
M&YOR ANNOUNCED THAT THE HEARING WAS CLOSED AND DIRECTED THE CITY ATTORNEY
TO PRCPARE AN ORDINANCE tNCORPORATING THE FINDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL WHEII
MADE.
%C.j• THAT AT SAID HEARING NO PROTESTS, OBJECTIONS OR TESTIMONY WERE
OFFERED AS TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS, THE CONTRACTS OR ASSESSMENTS THEREFOR, OR
AS TO ANY OF THE PROCEEDINGS IN REFERENCE THERETO EXCEPT AS HEREINA00VE
SET OUT; THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HAS HEARD ALL PARTIES WHO APPEARED AND DESIRED
TO BE HEARD AS TO THE SPECIAL BENEFITS IN ENHANCED VALUE TO ACCRUE TO SAID
ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF AS COMPARED TO THE
PORTION OF THE COSTS OF CONSTRUCTING SAID 114PAOVEMENTS PROPOSED TO BC '
AWSSED AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY, AND HAS HEARD ALL PARTIES APPEARING
AND OFFERING TESTIMONY, TOGETHER WITH ALL OBJECTIONS AND PROTESTS RELATIVE
TO SUCH FLATTERS AND RELATIVE TO ANY ERRORS, INVALIDITIES OR IRRCGULARITIES
IN ANY OF THE PROCEEDINGS FOR SAID IMPROVEMENTS, AND HAS GIVEN A FULL AND
FAIR HEARING TO ALL PANTIES MAKING OR DESIRING TO MAKE ANY SUCH PROTEST OR
OBJECTION OR TO °OFFER TESTIMONY, AND HAS FULLY EXAMINED AND CONSIDERED ALL
•x
OF SAID EVIDENCE, FLATTERS, TEST114ONY AND OBJECTION$ OFFERED,
ilkii; THAT BASED Olt THE EVIDENCES MATTERS, TESTIMONY AND OBJECTIONS' i
CONSIDERED AT SUCH HEARING THC SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPERTIES+ AND EACH AND EVERY PARCEL OF SUCH- PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID
SIDEWALK W1LC BE ENHANCED IN VALUE AND SPECIALLY DENEFITTC•D 114 AN AMOUNT
IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT OF THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO BE,
AND AS HEREtNAFTER, ASSESSED AGAINST EACH OF SAID PARCEL$ OF PROPERTY,
ABUTTING UPON SAID ALLEY, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF.
,titfr THAT SAID CITY COUNCIL IS OF THE OPINION, AND FINDS THAT
EXCEPT AS MAY BE VARIED THEREFROM IN THE ASSESSMENTS SET OUT IN SECTION
f6 BELOW, THE FRONT FOOT PLAN OR RULE, IF-UNIFORMLY APPLIED, WOULD NOT
RESULT IN INJUSTICES AND INEQUITIES SETWECtt THE DIFFERENT PARCCLS OF PROPERTY
WITHIN THE SAME UNIT, TO WHICH SAID PLAN OR RULE IS HEREBY APPLIED THAT IN
EACH OF THE CASES WHERE THE ASSESSMENT SET OUT IN SECTION 4 BCLOW HAS BEEN
VARIED FROM THE FRONT FOOT PLAN OR RULE, SAID CITY COUNCIL 15 OF THE
OPINION, AND FINDS, THAT SAID PLAN, IF UNIFORMLY APPLIED WOULD RESULT IN ;
_ :�lk
ti
INJUSTICES AND,IHEQUITIES DCTWCEN THC DIFCCRENT PARCELS OF PROPERTY WITHIN
THE SAME UNIT; AND THE CITY COUNCIL HAS DETERMINED TO APPORTION AND
ASSESS THE COSTS IN A 0{FFCRENT MANNER IN SUCH PROPOATIO143 AS IT DEEMS
AND FINDS TO DE JUST AND EQUITABLC, HAVING IN VIEW THE SPECIAL BENEFITS
TO THE ENHANLED VALUE OF THE PROPERTIES.
THAT SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS ADOPTED THC RULE OF APPORTIONMENT
AND DIVISION OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN SAID ABUTTING PROPER -
TICS AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER$ THEREOF HEREIN SET FORTH AND HAS FOUND
THE SAME TO BE JUST AND EQUITABLE AND TO PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL EQUALITY CON-
SIDERING THE BENEFITS TO BE RCCEIVED AND THE BURDEN$ IMPOSED THEREBY; AND
SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS FURTHER FOUND UPON THE EVIDENCE CONSIDERED THAT THE
ASSESSMENTS HEREINAFTER MADE AND THE CHARGES IIEREBV DECLARED AGAINST SAID
ABUTTING PROPERTIES AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNCRS THEREOF ARE JUST AND
EQUITABLE AND THAT ALL OBJECTIONS A14D PROTESTS SHOULD BE OVERRULED AND
DENIED,
SECTION P.. THERE Dam NO FURTHER PROTESTS OR TCST114ONY FOR OR
AGAINST OR 14 REFERENCE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS, BENEFITS OR PROCEEDINGS, SAID
HEARING GRANTED TO THE REAL AND TRUE OWNCRS OF PROPERTIES. ABUTTING UPON
SAID STREETS OR UNITS, WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFINED, AND ALL PERSONS,
FIRMS' CORPORATIONS AND ESTATES, OWNING OR CLAIMING SA14Z OR ANY INTEREST
THEREIN, SHALL BE, AND THE SAME I$ HEREBY CLOSED$ AND ALL PROTCSTS AND DO-
JECTIONS, WHETHER SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED OR NOT, SHALL DE AND THE SANE ARE
HEREBY OVERRULED AND DENIED.
SECTION 3. THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY FINDS AND DETERNINCS UPON THE
EVIDENCE HEARD IN REFERENCE TO EACH AND EVERY PARCEL OF PROPERTY ABUTTING
UPON THE SAID 'STREETS AND UNITS HEREIR OCT OUT THAT THE ENHANCEMENT IN VALUE
TO ACCRUE TO SAID PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF BY VIRTUE
OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID S1DL•WAI,KO WILL BE III EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT OF
THE COSTS OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO DE$ AND AS HEREIN ASSESSED
AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTIES AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS ThERCOF, AND
FINDS THAT THE APPORTIONMENT OF THE COSTS OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND THE
ASSESSMENT$ HEREINDELOW MADE ARE JUST AND EQUITABLE AND PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL
EQUALITY, CONSIDERING SHE BENEFITS RECEIVCD AND THE BUADEP13 IMPOSED THEREOV,
AND ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, AND THE CHARTER
°5-
r
Page 14
PROJECT: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS UNIT V
CONTRACTOR: FOWCO
ITEM
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
Nn.
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESS=
83.
Merced Lopez, Jr.
45.81 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
100.78
100.78
Lot 1, Block 10
Ext. of South End Addition
84.
Guadulupe Salinas
45.81 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
100.78
100.78
Lot2, Block 10
Ext. of South End Addition
85.
Anita Bier
45.81 L.F.
sidewalk
2.20
100.78
100.78
Lot 3, Block 10
Ext. South End Addition
Co
eman Avenue I
tersection
46.06 L.F.
86.
Sarah V. Fernandez
sidewalk
2.20
101.33
101.33
Lot 1, Block 5
Ext. of South End Addition
87.
Francisco R. Medina
46.06 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
101.33
101.33
Lots 2 & 3, Block 5
Ext. of South End Addition
88.
Weldon J. Ladewig
7.00 L.P.X
Sidewalk
2.20
184.93
184 -•93
Lot 1, Block 8
'Morris & Mitchell's Addition
*cr. existing sidewalk impr.
Morris
Avenue Intersection
140.00 L.F.
89.
H. Lee Scott
Sidewalk
2.20
308.00
308.0(
Lot 1, Block 5
Morris & Mitchell's Addition
90.
Estate of S.P. Ladin
139.34 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
153.27
153.21
Lot 1, Block 5
(69.67)
Steele & Laughlin Addition
50%
Ma
y Street Inte
section
ASSESSMENT ROLL
1_
PROJECT: SIDEWALK IMPROV24 NTS UNIT V
CONTRACTOR: FOWCO
ASSESSMENT RATES
Zoned & Used R -1 or R -2 Curb. Gutter & Pavement P.l.f. = $
Zoned or Used other than R -1 or R -2 C. G. & Pvmt. .l.f. = $
Sidewalk 1_ p. s . f = $
Driveway p.s.f: = $
i
ITEM
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QTTANTITY
DESGRTPIPMN
mmmAT.
N0,
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESSI
91.
Martina Garza
118.0 L.F.1
Sidewalk
2.75
159.50
159.50
Lot 17, Block 18
(58.0)
Chamberlain Addition
50%
92.
A. R. Yzaguirre
35.0 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.75
96.25
96.25
S. 35' of Lots 15 and 16
Block 18. 1
Chamberlain Addition
�2 -A-
Tommie Martinez
35.0 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.75
96.25
96.25
Middle 35' Lots 15 and 16
_
Block 18
Chamberlain Addition
+
93•
Abel Serna
118.0 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.75
324.50
324.50
Lot 17, Block 15
Chamberlain Addition Endl
of Brownlee
mprovements
ements From incock
Alameda Street Impr
Avenue to A
es Stre
t
B
Pinning at Haock
Avenue
West Si
le
94.
Mrs. D. N. Grossman
100.0 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
220.00
220.00
Lot 1,2,3 & 4, Block 11
Bay Terrace Addition
95•
Lelia Livengood
120.0 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
264.00
264.00
Lot 5,6,7,8 & S. 20' of Lot 9
Block 11
Bay Terrace Addition
96.
John Q. McCoy
105.0 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
231.00
31.00
N- 5' of Lot 9, Lots 10 - 13
Block 11
Bay Terrace Addition
L�
PROJECT: SIDEWALK IMPROVE[•MTS UNIT V
CONTRACTOR: FOWOO
ITEM
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
I
QUANTITY
I
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
Nn.
AC,S-`FACF71
nF
AMnumm
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESS
97•
V. V. Hurst
53.78 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
118.32 '
118.32
Lot 1, Block 14
Ext. of South End Addition
98.
Joe Salinas.
53.78 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
118.32
118.32
Lot 2, Block 14
Ext. of South End Addition
99•
H. Olsen
53.78 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
118.32
118.32
Lot 3, Block 14
Ext. of South End Addition
Coleman
Street I
tersection
- 0 -•L.F.
100.
Gilbert Isenberg
Sidewalk
2.20
356 -. -18
356-.18
Lots 1, 2 & 3, Block 1
-
Ext. of South End Addition
-
*credit existing sidewalk
101.
Rosa Barnes
- 0 -
Sidewalk
Lot 1, Block 12
Morris & Mitchell's extension
of South End Additon
* er. existing sidewalk Morxis
Street Intcrsection
161.17 L.F.
102.
Minnie T. Haas
Sidewalk
2.20
177.28
177.28
Lot 1, Block 1
(80.58)
Morris & Mitchell's Extension
of South End Addition
50%
IO2.a
Henry Salazar
78.65 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
173.03
173.03
Lot 2 -a, Block 1
Steel & McLaughlin Addition
103.
Juan Cantu
78.09 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
171.80
171.80
Lot 1 -a, Block 1
Steele & McIaughlin Addition
1
'
M.
ry Street Int
•rsection
PROJECT: SIDEWALK IMPROVO4MTS UNIT V
CONTRACTOR: FOWCO
ITEM
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
I
TOTAL
Nn_
QCSEGSE-D
nw
AMQTTNPT
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSESS
104.
Romana Saldana
118.0 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
259.60
259.6c
Lot 17, Block 21
Chamberlain Addition
105.
Abel Serna
118.0 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
259.60
259.6c
Lot 16, Block 21
Chamberlain Addition
Margarite Street
Intersection
118.0 L.F.
Sidewalk
106.
C. B. Mathiew
2.20
259.6o
259.6c
Lot 17, Block 12
Chamberlain Addition
107.
Richards & Roth
- 0 -
Lot 16, Block 12
Chamberlain Addition
Cr. existing asphalt parking
Ajameda
es Street Int
rsection
End
Street improvements
W
it Place Impr
vements
From Keiwood
Drive to
Agnes Street
Beg_nning
at Kenw
od Drive
East Sid
82.12 L.F.
108'.
W. W. Meredith
Sidewalk
2.20
90.33
90.33
Lot 1, Block 9
(41.o6)
Westgate Heights
50%
109.
D. V. Espey
116.58 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
128.24
128.24
Lots 2 & 3, Block 9
(58.29)
Westgate heights
50%
110.
W. L. Loimmn
58.29 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
64.11
64.11
Lot 4, Block 9
(29.14)
Westgate Heights
r
auk
Lam.
Page 18
PROJECT: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS UNIT V
CONTRACTOR; FOWCO
I•TEM
Tan.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
I
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSE
111.
A. Id. Ritter 265 Longview W.
58.29 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
64.11
64.11
Lot 5, Block 9
(29.14)
Westgate.Heights
50%
112.•
W. J. Morris 261 Longview Id.
58.29 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
64.11
64.11
Lot 6, Block 9
(29.1'4)
Westgate Heights
113.
A. J. De Muele 257 Longview W.
63.61 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
69.96
69.96
All lot 7, & N.11.69'
(31.81)
Lot 8, Block 9
Westgate Heights
114.
Cecil D. Richardson 251 Longvie 1
63.60 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
69.96
69.96
S. 38.32' Lot 8 & N.25.28'
(31.80)
Lot 9, Block 9
Westgate Heights
115.
John W. Houston 247 Longview
63.60 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
69.96
69.96
S. 25.03' Lot 9 & N.38.57'
(31.80)
Lill 1V, Bluc'k 9
Westgate Heights
116.
Robert M. Morrow 241 Longview
62.24 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
68.46
68.46
S. 12.13' Lot 10 & All 11
(31.12)
Block 9,
Westgate Heights
117.
W. W. Meredith 239 Ohio
75.0 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
82.50
82.50
All Lot 12 & N.25.0' Lot 13
(37.50)
Block 9
Westgate Heights
118.
M. E. White, Jr. 4510 Driftwood
102.26 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
112.48
112.48
S. 25.0' Lot 13 & All 14
(51.13)
Block 9
Westgate Heights
t=--L(
PROJECT: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS UNIT V
CONTRACTOR: ROW.O
ITEM
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
tun,
naonoSru
Or'
AMOUN
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
ASSES
Blue
onnet Drive I
tersection
83,66 L.F.-
119.
Herman Ladewig
Sidewalk
2.20
92.03
92.03
Lot 1, Block 11
(41,83)
Westgate Heights
*includes return on Bluebonnet
Drive
120.
Nicolas Abrego ,
63.0 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
69,30
69.30
Lot 2, Block 11
(31.50)
Weesstgate Heights
121•
A. C. Delgado
70.0 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
77.00
77,00
Lot 3, Block 11
(35.00)
Westgate Heights
50%
122•
C.F. Roegels
Lot 4, Black 11
70.5 L.F.
(35.30)
Sidewalk
2.20
77.66
77.66
Westgate Heights
123-
R. F. Oliver
133.62 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20•
146.98
146.98
Lot 5, Block 11
(66.81)
Heights
Westgate
124.
Bill Fowler
Lot 6, Block ll
75.35 L.F.
(37.67)
Sidewalk
2.20
82.87
82.87
Westgate Heights
50%
24,a
Mrs. Jonas Weil
649.65 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20'
:1,429.23
1,1129.2,
Jonas Weil 17.08 Acre Tract
Agnes
Street Int
rsection
End
Weil Place Improvements
Pape 20
PROJECT: SID04ALK IMPROVEMENTS UNIT V
CONTRACTOR: F0wCO
ITEM
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION I
QUANTITY
I
DESCRIPTION
I
I
I
TOTAL
N�-
ASSESSED
OF
AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT I
ASSESS;
Chico Street
From How
ird Street to
1,ommanche Street
Beg'nning
at Howa
d Street
East Sid
107.46 L.F.
Sidewalk
125..
Augustin Sanchez
2.20
118.21
118.21
Lot 26, Block 1 - except the
(53.73)
East 25 feet
.Loma Alta Addition
50%
126.
Acme Refrigeration Company, Inc
111.31 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
122.43
122.4=
Lot 25, Block 1
(55.65)
Loma Alta Addition
(50%)
Comainche
Street I
tersection '
End of East
3ide
End of Chico
treet
Howard St
_et
From
Lqth Street tc
Chico Street
Be
_ inning at lqth
Street
North-Sida
50 L.F.
127.
Arthur M. Gomez
Sidewalk
2.20
110.00
110.01
Lot 51, Block 1
Loma Alta Addition
128.
Adolfo Jiminez
40 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20 -
88.00
88.00
Lot 50, Block 1
Loma Alta Addition
129.
Inez B. I uie
- 0
Lot 49, Block 1
Loma Alta Addition
*credit for existing sidewalk
130.
M. Guerrero) Lot 118, Block l'
6 L.F.*
Sidewalk
2.20
13.20
13.21
131.
Loma Addition sidewalk
Ramon BernaLe
40 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
88.00
08.0
Lot RI• "j, 1330ck J.
Page 21
PROJECT: SIDL14ALK IMPROVEMENTS UNIT V
CONTRACTOR: FOWM
ITEM
N0.
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF -
ASSESSMENT
j
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESS]
L32.
Maria Munoz
110 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
88.00
88.00
Lot 46, Block 1
Loma Alta Addition
L33.
B. S. Aparicio
40 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
88.00
88.00
Lot 45, Block 1
Loma Alta Addition
134.
B e-lia T. Aranda,
40 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
88.00
88.00
Lot 44, Block 1
Loma Alta Addition
135•
Jesus T. Rodriguez
40 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
88.00
88.00
Lot 43, Block 1
Loma Alta Additbn
136.
Fidel C. Saldana
40 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
88.00
88.00
Lot 42, Block 1
Loma Alta Addition
137.
Francisco C. Cabrera
40 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20 .
88.00
88.00
Lot 41. Block 1
Loma Alta Addition
138.
Francisco C. Cabrera
40 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
88.00
88.00
Lot 40, Block 1
Loma Alta Addition
139.
Jose R. Narvaez
40 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
88.00
88.00
Lot 39, Block 1
Loma Alta Addition
140.
Susie 0. Farias
40 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
88.00
88.00
Lot 38, Block 1
Loma Alta Addition
Al.
Jesus Saldana
40 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
88.00
88.00
Lot 37, Block 1
Loma Alta Addition
PROTECT: STTIPWAT.K IMPROVEMENTS ,TMTT IT
CONTRACTOR: FOWCO
ITEM
NO.
I OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
AS5ESS1dJ;1V''
RATE
AMUUMe
TOTAL
AMOUNT
A85E8,S'
142.
Jesus Puente
*35 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
77.00
77.00
Lot 36, Block 1
Loma Alta Addition
*cr. existing sidewalk
143.
Alfred Mayorga, Jr.
40 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
88.00
88.00
Lot 35, Block 1
Loma Alta Addition
144.
Alfred Mayorga `•
40 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
88.00
88.00
Lot 34, Block 1
Loma Alta Addition
145.
Amelia Vargas Martinez
40 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
88.00
88.00
Lot 33, Block 1
Loma Alta Additinn
i46.
Jesus G. Gonzalez
-0 -*
Lot 32, Block 1
Loma Alta Addition
credit for existing sidewalk
-
,1,7
�,.r.. �
�-
-ry L.X.
Sidewalk
2.20
LSCS.UU
25ii.U0
Lot 31, Block 1
Loma Alta Addition
148.
Angelita Lopez Ramirez
40 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
88.00
88.00
Lot 30, Block 1
Loma Alta Addition
149.
Alfredo G. Vargas
40 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
88.00
88.00
Lot 29, Block 1
Loma Alta Addition -
150.
Juan Santana
- 0 -
Lot 28, Block 1
Loma Alta Addition
* credit existingsidewalk
151.
-Pablo Martinez
40 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
88.00
88.00
Lot 27, Block 1
Lana Alta Adaltion
L.
Pace 2
PROJECT: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS UNIT V
CONTRACTOR: FOWCO
ITEM
NO,
OWNER & PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESS> n
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
narn,rnm
I ASSESS:
152•
E. S. Hinojosa
25 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
55.00
55.00
East 25 Feet of Lot 26, Block 1
Loma Alta Addition
L53•
Augustin Sanchez
64.88 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
142.74
1112.74
-
Lot 26, Block 1, except East
25 Feet
Loma Alta Addition
Chi
co Street IntE
rsecti_on
End of North
Side
Ind
of Howard Street
Karen Drive
From
escott to Shirley
Drive
Begi
ping at Presc
tt Street
South Sid
154.
Eluterio 0. Martinez
110 L.F.
Sidewalk
i
2.20
121.00
121.00
Lot 1, Block 5
(55.0)
Pr es,2ntt -Park Addition VT it 11
I
-
50% Shiley
Drive Int
rsection -From Karen
Drive
ginnin g
At Karen
Drive, going
oath on East Side
L55•
Augustin Sanchez
99.00
90 L.F.
Sidewa
Lot 1, Block 4
(45.0)
Prescott Park Addition Unit 4
156.
Frank Melve
9 L.F.
Sidewalk
2.20
99.00
99.00
Lot 4
(45-0)
Prescott Park Additinn Unit 4
50
End of Shirle
Drive
End of East lide
END 01
SIDEWALK UNII
V PROJECT
OF SAID CITY; AND FURTHER FINDS THAT ALL PROCCEDII05 AND CONTRACTS HERETO -'
FORE HAD WITH REFERENCE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ALL RESPECTS REGULAR$
PROPER AND VALID, AND THAT ALL PREREQUISITES TO THE FIXING OF THE ASSESS-
MENT LIENS AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTICS, AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED,
AND THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE REAL' AND TRUE OWNERS' THEREOF, WHETHER
NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN OR NOTy HAVE BEEN IN ALL THINGS REGULARLY
HAD AND PERFORMED IN'C014PLIANCE WITH THE LAW AND THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID
CITY COUNCIL.
SECTION 4. IN PURSUANCC OF SAID ORDINANCE DULY ENACTED BY SAID
CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING AND ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID SIDEWALKS AS
HERE$NBELOW SET OUT.* WHICH Of WAS PASSED.* AS AFORESAID ON THE[ 12TH
DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1969, AND IN PURSUANCE OF SAID PROCEEDINGS HERETOFORE HAD
AND ENACTED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO SAID IMPROVC14ENTS AND BY
VIRTUE OF THE POWERS VESTED IN SAID CITY WITH RESPECT TO SAID SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENTS BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE
TO CHAPTER 106, ACTS OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE 40TH LEGISLATURE,
Gl
KNOWN AS ARTICLE 110513, VERNONIS TEXA$ CIVIL STATUTES, AS AMENDED, AND
ARTICLE IX, SECTION 6 OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS,
THERE SHALL BE, AND I$ HEREBY LEVIED, ASSESSED AND TAXED AGAINST THE
RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AND ABUTTING UPON THE
SAID STREETS AND UNITS HEREINAFTER SET OUT'AND WITHIN THE LIHITS BELOW
DEFINED AND AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF OUCH PROPERTY ,WHETHER SUCH
REAL AND TRUE OWUORS BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED, OR SAID PROPERTIES OF
CORRECTLY DESCRIDED HEREIN OR NOT, THE SEVERAL SUM$ OF MONEY HEREINAFTER
MENTIONED AND ITEMIZED OPPOSITE THE DESCRIPTION OF THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS
OF SAID PROPERTY, THE NUMBER OF FRONT FELT OF EACH, AND THE SEVERAL AMOUNTS
ASSESSED AC4INST SAME AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND THE NA14ES
OF THE APPARENT OWNERS THEREOF, ALL AS CORRECTED AND ADJUSTED BY SAID CITY
COUNCIL, BEING AS FOLLOWS, TO"WIT:
0
SECTION 5. THE ASSESSMENTS LEVIED IN SECTION 4 ABOVE ARE FOR A
PORTION OF THE COSTS OF SAID IMPROVCMENTS IN THE STREETS AND UNITS THEREIN
SET OUT, AND THE ASSESSMENTS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS IN SAID UNITS ARE IN
NOWISE RELATED TO, OR CONNECTED WITH, THE IMPROVEMENTS OR ASSESSMENTS IN
ANY OTHER OF THE STREETS OR UNITS DESCRIBED IN SAID ORDINANCE OR -EACH OTHER;
AND IN LEVYING SAID ASSESSMENTS THE AMOUNT SO ASSESSED FOR THE IMPROVEMENT
IN SAID UNITS HAVE BEEN IN NOWISE AFFECTED BY ANY FACT OR THING IN ANY WAY
CONNECTED WITH THE IMPROVEMENTS OR THE ASSESSMENTS THEREFOR IN ANY OTHER
OF SAID UNITS. THE OMISSION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS IN ANY OF SAID STREETS OR
UNITS AS A WHOLE SHALL IN NOWISE AFFECT NOR IMPAIR THE VALIDITY OF THE
ASSESSMENTS IN ANY OTHER OF SAID UNITS AND THE OMISSION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS
IN ANY PARTICULAR STREET OR UNIT IN FRONT OF ANY PARCEL OF PROPERTY EXEMPT
FROM THE LIEN OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS OR AGAINST WHICH A VALID PROPERTY ASSESS-
MENT CANNOT BE LEVIED, SHALL IN NOWISE AFFECT NOR IMPAIR THE VALIDITY OF
THE ASSESSMENTS AGAINST THE OTHER PROPERTIES IN SUCH UNIT.
SECTION 6. THE SEVERAL SUMS MENTIONED ABOVE IN SECTION 4 HEREOF,
ASSESSED AGAINST SAID PARCELS OF ABUTTING PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE
OWNERS OR OWNER THEREOF, WHETHER SAID OWNERS BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED,
OR SAID PROPERTIES BE CORRECTLY DESCRIBED HEREIN OR NOT, TOGETHER WITH
INTEREST THEREON AT THE RATE OF SIX AND ONE -HALF PERCENT (6 -1/2%) PER
ANNUM AND WITH REASONABLE ATTORNEYS FEES AND ALL COSTS AND EXPENSE OF
COLLECTION, IF INCURRED, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE AND MADE A.FIRST AND
PRIOR LIEN UPON THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY AGAINST WHICH SA14E
ARE ASSESSED FROM AND AFTER THE DATE SAID IMPROVEMENTS WERE ORDERED BY
SAID CITY COUNCIL, AND A PERSONAL LIABILITY AND CHARGE AGAINST THE REAL
AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, WHETHER OR NOT SUCH OWNER OR OWNERS
BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN, PARAMOUNT AND SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER
LIENS, CLAIMS OR TITLES EXCEPT FOR LAWFUL AD VALOREM TAXES; AND THAT
THE SUMS SO ASSESSED SHALL BE PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, OR
ITS ASSIGNS, IN MONTHLY INSTALLMENTS OF NOT EXCEEDING TWENTY -FOUR (24)
IN NUMBER, SAID PAYMENTS TO BE MADE AT THE CITY HALL 'IN THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS, THE FIRST OF WHICH SHALL BE PAY-
ABLE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FRO14 THE DATE OF THE COMPLETION OF SAID
-7-
IMPROVEMENTS AND THEIR ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ONE
INSTALLMENT SHALL BE PAYABLE EACH 14ONTH THEREAFTER UNTIL SAID ASSESSMENT
HAS BEEN PAID IN FULL, INCLUDING INTEREST THEREON AT THE RATE OF 6-112%
PER ANNUM FROM AND AFTER THE DATE OF SAID COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE,
PAST DUE PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST TO BEAR INTEREST AT THE SAME RATE PER
ANNUM UNTIL PAID, SO THAT UPON THE COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE BY SAID
CITY COUNCIL OF THE IMPROVEMENTS IN ANY UNIT OR PORTION OF STREET ABOVE
DEFINED, THE ASSESSMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SUCH COMPLETED
AND ACCEPTED UNIT SHALL BE AND BECOME DUE AND PAYABLE IN INSTALLMENTS AS
PROVIDED. PROVIDED HOWEVER, THE OWNER OR OWNERS OF ANY SUCH PROPERTY
SHALL HAVE THE PRIVILEGE OF PAYING ALL OW ANY OF SAID INSTALLMENT, TOGETHER
WITH INTEREST ACCRUED THEREON DOWN TO THE DATE OF PAYMENT; AND PROVIDED
FURTHER THAT THE OWNER OR OWNERS OF ANY SUCH PROPERTY MAY PAY THE TOTAL
OF SUCH ASSESSMENT WITHOUT INTEREST WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER THE
COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS. IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE
IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY INSTALLMENT OF PRINCIPAL OR INTEREST, PROMPTLY WHEN
DUE, THEN AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY'OF CORPUS CHRISTI, OR ITS ASSIGNS,
THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF SAID ASSESSMENT UPON WHICH DEFAULT IS MADE TOGETHER
WITH REASONABLE ATTORNEYS FEES AND ALL COSTS AND EXPENSES OF COLLECTION,
° IF INCURRED, SHALL BE AND BECOME IMMEDIATELY DUE AND PAYABLE.
SECTION 7. IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY OF
SAID SUMS HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST THE SAID PARCELS OF PROPERTY, AND THE
REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF COLLECTION THEREOF SHALL BE EN-
FORCED, AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, OR ITS ASSIGNS, EITHER
BY SUIT IN ANY COURT HAVING JURISDICTION, OR BY SALE OF THE PROPERTY
ASSESSED AS NEARLY AS POSSIBLE IN THE MANNER AS MAY BE PROVIDED BY LAW IN
FORCE IN SAID CITY FOR THE COLLECTION OF AD VALOREM TAXES.
SECTION 8. FOR THE PURPOSE OF EVIDENCING SAID ASSESSMENTS THE
LIENS SECURING SAME AND THE SEVERAL SUMS ASSESSED AGADZ T THE SAID PARCELS
OF PROPERTY, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AND THE TIME
AND TERMS OF PAYMENTS AND AID IN THE ENFORCE14ENT THEREOF, ASSIGNABLE
CERTIFICATES SHALL BE ISSUED BY THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI] TEXAS, TO
In
THE CITY 01' CORPUS CHRISTI UPON THE COMPL£F10N AND ACCEPTANCE OF SAID SIDE
VALK IMPP,O`/£T1MITS IN A14Y U141T OR PORTION OF STREET ADDVE DEFINED, wRICH
CERTIFICATES SHALL CE EXECUTED E1Y TIIE MAYOR IN THE HAY.E OF THE CITY,
ATTEST::D BY THE CITY SECRETARY WITH THE CORPORATE SEAL, AND WHICH SHALL
DECLAPF THr AMOUNTS OF SAID ASSESSt1_?I1'S AND THE TIMGS AND TERMS TbtCREOF,
THE RAT£ OF INTEREST TIiCF.EO ?4, THE DATE OF THE COMPLM ON AND THE ACCEPTANCE
OF THE Ib1PF10VEAfENTS FOR WHICH THE CERTIFICATE IS ISSVCO; AtiO SHALL CONTAIN
THE HAVE OF THE APPARENT OWNER OR 0;01ER5 AS ACCURATELY A$ POSSIBLE, AND THE
DESCRIPTIOH OF THE PROPERTY ASSESSEO BY LOT AND £LOCK 14UOiP£R OR FRONT FOOT•
TH£R£OF, 0.1 SUCH OTHER DESCRIPTIONS AS MY OTt1CR }JISE IDENTIFY T11E SAM, 4
AND IF THE SAID PROPERTY SHALL DE OWNED B1 AN-ESTATE OR FIRI•{, IMC14 TO SO
STATE TIIE FACT SHALL BE SUFFICIENT, AND 110 ERROR OR MISTAKE IN DESCRIBING
ANY SUCH PROPERTY OR I11 GIVING THE NAME OF ANY OWNER OR OWNERS, OR OTHER-
WISE, SHALL 114 ANYTII$£ 1HV4LIDATE OR IMPAIR THE ASSESSI4ENT LEVIED HERLSY
OR THE CErTIFICATE ISSUED IN EVIDENCE THEREOt. -
THE SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL FURTHER PROO DL $V05TANTIALLY THAT IF
DEFAULT SHALL BE MiADE IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY ItISTA1.1-mCNT OF PRINCIPAL OP
i NTfRCST WHEN DUE, THEN AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CtimeT1, OR ITS
ASSIGNS, OR THE IiDLOEFI TNEREOF, THE WHOLE OF SAID ASSE$5111;,la kYIOEHCEO THERE-
BY SIIALL AT ONCE BECOME CUE AND PAYABLE AND SHALL PF COLLECTIBLE lf$Tll
P.E,ASOIIAULE ATTORNEYIS FOES AND ALL EXPENSES AND COSTS OF COLLLCTION, IF
INCUPPED; AND SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL SET FORTH AND EVIDEt.CE YHE PERSONAL
LIABILITY OF THC FIEAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS OF SUCH PROPERTY, illmTHER
NAMED OR COP.RECTLY HAFIED TH£RE114 OR NOT, AHD THr LI CN UPON SUCH PROPERTY=
AND THAT SAID LIEN 16 'FIRST A14D PARAMOUNT THEREON, SUPERIOP. TO ALL OTHER LIENS,
• TiTLCS AND CHARLES, EXCEPT FOR LAWFUL AD VALON04 TAXES, FROM AND AFTER THE
DATE. SAID IMPROVEt4VITS WERE ORDERED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, AND SHALL. PROVIDE
IN EFFECT, TiIAT IF DEFAULT SIIALL DE 14AOC lit THE PAYMENT TIICREOF, THE SA14E
MAY DE E14FORCCD, AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI OR ITS ASSIGNS,
CITRCR BY THE SALG OF THE PROP =RTY 111VICIN DLSC:IOCD IN THC N.ANUCt1 PROVIDED
FOR THE COL{ECTIOH OF AD VALOEtEId TAXES AS AOOVE RELITCD, OR BY SUIT 114 ANY
COURT IIAVifM JURISDICTION.
•'3-
SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL FURTHER RECITE IN EFFECT THAT ALL THE PRO -
CEEDIHQS WITH REFE11VICE TO tMIMIG SAID IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN REGULARLY
HAD III CO:4PLIANCE 111TR THE LAl1 In FOP.CC III SAID CITY AND PROCCEDiNGS OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY, AND THAT ALL PREPCOUISITES I'D THE FIXING
OF THE ASSESSIiaiF LICH AGAINST THE PROPERTY AND THE PERSONAL LiADILITY
OF THE REAL AND TRUE WHER OR OWNERS THEREOF, EVIOF.tICEO BY SUCH CERTIFIA
CATCS, HAVE SEEN REGULARLY DONE AND PERI.ORHED, WHICH RECITALS SHALL 6C
EVIDENCE OF ALL THC MATTERS AND FACTS SO RECITED, AND NO FURTHER PROOF
THEREOF SHALL BE REQUIRED IN ANY COURT.
$AID CERTIFICATES SHALL FURTHER PROVIDE III EFFECT THAT THE CITY
OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, SHALL EXERCiSC HLL OF ITS LA%IFVL POWERS, IIHE14
REOVE:TEO SO TO DO BY THE HOLDER OF SAID CERTIFICATES, TO Ala It, TFtE En-
FORCEMENT AND COLLECTION THEP_'OF, AND SAID CERTIFIC11TE3 MAY CONTAIN OTFIER
AND FURTHER RECITALS PERTINENT AND APPROPRIATE THERETO. IT SHALL HOT BE.
urrre r.s uu T!MT cair. CrFMFlrx TVC nr Ira Tur cvgrT rnOM A5 AnM1r crT
FORTH, BUT THE SUBSTANCE AND EFFECT THEREOF bHALL SUFFICE.
SECTION g. ALL SUCH AS$ESSMENTS LEVIED ARC, AND SHALL BE A PER^
SOFIAL LIABILITY AND CHARGE AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE REAL APED TAME 01MER OR
OWNERS OF SAID ADUTTING PROPERTIES, IIOTWITHSTANDING SUCH OWNER OR OWNERS
MY NOT CC NAMED Oft CORRECTLY HARED, At4D ANY IRREGULARITY III THE NA14C OF
THE PROPCHTY 011110, OR THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY PROPERTY OR THE AHOUNT OF ANY
ASSESSMENT, OR IN ANY OTHER MATTER OF THING SHALL HOT III ANYWISE INVALIDATE
OR IMPAIR ANY ASSESSMENT LEVIED HER£OY OR ANY CERTIFICATE IS3UEo, AND ANY
SUCH 1413TAKE, OR CRROR, INVALIDITY OR IRRECVLARITY, WHETHER IN SUCH ASSESS -
MNT OR IN THE CERTIFICATES ISSUED IN EVIOCUCE THCREOF, Wly BC, BUT IS HOT
RrDUIF.EO TO BE, IN ORDER TO CC ENFO:RCEADLE, CORRECTED AT ANY T114C BY THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS. _
THE TOTAL AMOUNTS ASSESSED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF
PROPERTY AOUTTING UPON THE UNIT'S OR PORTIONS OF &TREETS ABOVE SET OUT, AND
THE REAL AND TRUC OWNER OR QW4CR3 THEREOF, ARE THE $AMC, oft LESS THAN,
THE CSTMATES OF SAID ASSESSMENT$ PItrPARCD BY THE DIRECTOR Or PUBLIC :iORKS
AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY SAID CITY-COUt1CIL, Atli) ARE IN ACCGRDAAICE WITH
THE PROCCCOINGS OF SAID CITY f:ELATiVE TO SAID IMPROVCiCUTSi AND ASSCCSMEI4TS
mj 0-
THEREFOR, AND WITH THE TERMS, POWERS AND PROVISIONS OF SAID CHAPTER 1O6
OF THE ACTS OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE YOTH LEGISLATURE, KNOWN
AS ARTICLE 11058, VERNON'S TEXAS CIVIL STATUTES, AS AMENDED, AND ARTICLE
IX, SECTION 6 OF THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY, UNDER WHICH TERMS, PROVISIONS
AND POWERS OF SAID ACTS SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS WERE HAD AND
MADE BY SAID CITY COUNCIL.
.SECTION 10. THE IMPORTANCE TO THE PUBLIC OF DETERMINING THE
ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PROPERTY OWNERS.AND THEREBY ENABLING CONSTRUCTION TO
PROCEED AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE CREATES A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND AN IMPERATIVE
PUBLIC NECESSITY REQUIRING THE SUSPENSION OF THE CHARTER RULE THAT NO ORDI-
NANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE PASSED F114ALLY ON THE DATE OF ITS INTRODUCTION
AND THAT SUCH ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE SEVERAL MEET-
INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THE MAYOR, HAVING DECLARED THAT SUCH EMERGENCY
AND NECESSITY EXIST, HAVING REQUESTED THAT SUCH CHARTER RULE BE SUSPENDED
AND TAKE EFFECT AND BE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT FROM AND AFTER ITS PASSAGE,
IT IS ACCORDINGLY SO ORDAINED, THIS THE /qd.-DAY OF DECEMBER, 1969
• ATTEST:
✓ � 9
CITY SECR TAR /
APPROVED: U
DAY OF DEC PER, 1969:
CITY ATT'bFRNEY
yt4A",e&�.j
R
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
f
Corpus Christi, Texas
17ZL day of 19Q7
TO THE tEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Corpus Christi, Texas
For the reasons set- forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing
ordinance, a public emergency and imperative necessity exist for the suspen-
sion of the Charter rule or requirement that no ordinance or resolution shall
be passed finally on the date it is introduced, and that such ordinance or
resolution shall be read at three meetings of the City Council; I, therefore,
request that you suspend said Charter rule or requirement and pass this ordi-
nance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the
City Council.
Respectfully,
wG�
D XOR
. THE CITY OF CORPUS CiH�ISTI, TEXAS
The Charter rule was suspended by the following vote:
Jack R. Blackmon
Gabe Lozano, Sr.
V. A. "Dick"Bradley, Jr.
Eduardo E. de Ases
Ken McDaniel
W. J. "Wrangler" Roberts
Ronnie Sizemore
The above ordinance was passed by the following vote:
Jack R. Blackmon
Gabe Lozano, Sr.
V. A. "Dick" Bradley, Jr. _
Eduardo E. de Ases
Ken McDaniel
W. J. Wrangler" Roberts
. Ronnie Sizemore
r