HomeMy WebLinkAbout10873 ORD - 05/24/19727RR:dp:5- 22- 72:lst. " 1
AN ORDINANCE
CLOSING THE HEARING GIVEN TO THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF
PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE HEREINAFTER NAMED STREET IN
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, TO -WIT:
Gollihar Road from Caddo Street to Airline Road
AND FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PROPERTY ABUTTING SAID -
STREET WILL BE SPECIFICALLY BENEFITTED AND ENHANCED IN
VALUE IN EXCESS OF COST OF IMPROVEMENTS, AND LEVYING AN
ASSESSMENT FOR PAYMENT; FIXING A CHARGE AND LIEN, THE
MANNER AND TIME OF PAYMENT AND COLLECTION; AND DECLARING
AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the City Council of Corpus Christi, Texas, by duly enacted
ordinance passed and approved on April 19, 1972, determined the necessity
for and order the improvement of the following street:
Gollihar Road from Caddo Street to Airline Road
by the construction, reconstruction, repairing or realigning of concrete
sidewalks, in the manner and according to the plans and specifications here-
tofore approved and adopted by the City Council by ordinance dated April 19,
1972, a duly executed Notice of said ordinance having been filed in the name
of said City with the County Clerk of Nueces County, Texas: and
WHEREAS, said City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas,
after having advertised for and received bids on the construction of said im-
provements for the length of time and in the manner and form as required by
the Charter of said City and the laws of the State of Texas, and after having
duly and regularly made appropriation of funds available for such purpose to
cover the estimated cost of said improvements to said City, all as provided
by the Corpus Christi City Charter and by law, did award a contract for the
construction of said improvements to their lowest and most advantageous bid
and said contract has been awarded to Burtex Constructors. Inc.
as authorized by Ordinance No. , dated May 24. 1972 , and the
performance bond required by said contract has been properly furnished by
said Burtex Constructors, Inc, and accepted by the said City Council of said
City as to form and amount as required by the Charter of said City and the
laws of the State of Texas; and
WHEREAS, the said City Council has caused the Director of Engineering
Services to prepare and file estimates of the cost of such improvements and
10873
estimates of the amount per front foot proposed to be assessed against the
property abutting upon a portion of the aforesaid streets within the limit
herein defined, to be improved, and the real and true owners thereof, and
said Director of Engineering Services has heretofore filed said estimates
and a statement of other matters relating thereto with said City Council,
the same has been received, examined and approved by said City Council; and
WHEREAS, said City Council, by duly enacted ordinance dated
April 19, 1972, did determine the necessity of levying an assessment for
that portion of the cost of constructing said improvements on the abovenamed
street, within the limits herein defined, to be paid by the abutting property
and the real and true owners thereof, and by ordinance dated April 19, 1972,
did order and set a hearing to be held at 3:00 o'clock P.M. on the 17th day
of May, 1972, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, in the City of Corpus
Christi, Texas, for the real and true owners of the property abutting upon
said streets, within the limits above defined, and for all others owning or
claiming any interest in, or otherwise interested in said property, or any
of said matters as to the assessments and amounts to be assessed against
each parcel or abutting property and the real and true owner or owners thereof,
and as to the special benefits to accrue to said abutting property by virtue
of said improvements, if any, or concerning any error, invalidity, irregularity
or deficiency in any proceedings, or contract, to appear and be heard in person
or by counsel and offer evidence in reference to said matters; and the City
Council did by ordinance order and direct the City to give notice of said
hearing to the owners abutting upon said street as shown by the current ad
valorem tax roll by mailing such notice to such owners and publishing said
notice at least three times in the Corpus Christi Times before the date of the
hearing, such notice of mail and by publication being in compliance with the
provisions of Article 1105B of Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas; and
WHEREAS, such notice was given said owners of property as shown on
the current ad valorem tax roll within the limits of the street being improved
by mailing such notice at least fourteen (14) days prior to the hearing to
such owners and by publishing three times notice of such hearing in the
Corpus Christi Times, the first of which publication was at least twenty -one (21)
-2-
days prior to the date of said hearing; both forms of notice being in compliance
with and containing the information required by Article 1105B, Vernon's
Annotated Civil Statutes; and
WHEREAS, after due, regular and proper notice thereof, all as pro-
vided by Law and the Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, said hearing
of which notice was given, was opened and held on May 17, 1972, in the Council
Chambers of City Hall in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, in accordance with
said ordinance and notice, at which time an opportunity was given to all said
above - mentioned persons, firms, corporations and estates, their agents and
attorneys, to be heard and to offer evidence as to all matters in accordance
with said ordinance and notice, at which time the following appeared and
offered the following testimony:
-3-
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
May 17, 1972
Page 12
Mayor Pro Tem Bonniwell resumed the Chair in the temporary absence of
Mayor Sizemore and announced the public hearing scheduled for 3 :00 p.m. on Gollihar
Road Improvements from Caddo to Airline Road.
City Manager Townsend explained the purpose of the hearing was to comply
with the statutes regarding paving assessments and explained the procedure to be
followed. He stated that the Director of Engineering Services will present the
plans and specifications of the project, and that Assistant City Attorney Jim
McKibben will conduct the hearing,
N
Mr. McKibben stated that testimony will be heard from the Director of
Engineering Services, and evaluation testimony from a real estate appraiser to
substantiate the assessments which appear on the assessment roll, and that this
hearing is to form a basis on which the Council, acting as a legislative body, would
determine or establish the assessments on the abutting properties.
Director of Engineering Services James K. Lontos was interrogated as to
his occupation, time of residence in the City; formal qualifications and familiarity
with the subject project. He presented the plans and specifications for the pro-
posed improvements, explained the nature and extent, and pointed out the location
by lots and blocks on the map. He stated that the project includes minor storm
sewer adjustments, the standard 6 -inch curb and gutter sections, reinforced concrete
sidewalks varying,in width from six feet along schools to the normal 4 feet wide;
driveways where needed and requested by property owners, and storm sewers to
properly drain the streets. He explained that a small storm sewer extension is
proposed in Brock Drive and Bradshaw Drive to alleviate a small drainage problem;
that the plans include the extension of the concrete box at Airline and Adel Drive
to Drexel; stated that the assessment rates had been determined in accordance with
the assessment policy of the City by taking the unit prices used in the low bid
submitted by Burtex Constructors and applying these unit prices to the front footage
of the abutting properties; that properties being used for residential purposes
are being assessed the maximum rate established by ordinance which is $4.75 per
linear foot; that the total cost of the construction shown on the preliminary
assessment roll is $274,180.87; total estimated assessments, $41,114.83; and total
cost to the City is $233,066.04.
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
May 17, 1972
Page 13
Mr. Patrick Horkin, attorney representing the Saint Pius X Catholic Church
property, Lot B, Meadowbrook Unit 4, questioned the calculation of assessment rates
on this property.
Mayor Pro Tem Bonniwell asked Mr. Lontos to specifically explain how the
rates had been calculated on the property identified as Item #27.
Mr. Lontos stated the church property was assessed on the basis of the full
residential rate, and that the determination was that the 5 -acre tract has a large
frontage on St. Pius Drive, but that they also have access to the parking lot from
Gollihar, and that this was considered as frontage because the plat does not show any
side yard, and the building line is specifically classified as siding onto Gollihar.
He further explained that the ordinance states that if property is deeper than 250
feet, as a matter of policy, it should be assessed as frontage.
Mr. Harold Carr testified as to his identity as a real estate appraiser,
time of residence in the City of Corpus Christi, occupation, experience as an appraiser,
of all types of real estate, residential, commercial, vacant and rural, his present
occupation as a real estate broker, and familiarity with the subject area and project.
He filed his qualifications in writing with the Council. Mr. Carr described the
general area, and pointed out the various uses, both business and residential; stated
that there are no irregular shaped Lots; that he had personally examined each parcel
of land and had checked each with the preliminary assessment roll, and that in his
opinion each and every parcel would be enhanced in value as a result of the improve-
ments at least to the extent of the assessment.
Mr. Guy Winstead, owner of Lot 14, Block 8, Item 929, and Lot 15, Block 8,
Item #29 -A, both in Koolside Addition, stated that he does have an odd - shaped lot.
He inquired as to the amount of land that would be taken from off his property for
curb and gutter, and as to the location of the driveway. He complained that he had
been refused a building permit to improve the property because of the shape and size
of the lot, and pointed out that if any more is taken, the property would be worth-
less to him; that the proposed improvements would damage the property more than it
could possibly enhance it, and that if he could not build and improve the property
he would not pay the assessment.
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
May 17, 1972
Page 14
Mr. Lontos stated the Staff is having problems in the final survey of
this tract; that the survey on the ground does rot agree with the plat, and there
has been difficulty in verifying the corner lot size.
(Mayor Sizemore reported at the meeting and resumed the Chair)
� f
City Manager Townsend explained that the Staff had met with Mr. Winstead
and had not been able to verify the plat with the on- the - ground survey, but that they
are in the process of tracing the records in an effort to resolve this problem.
Mayor Sizemore asked Mr. Winstead if he would be satisfied with the assess-
ments if he were granted a building permit, and Mr. Winstead stated he did not feel
it his responsibility to hire an attorney or an appraiser, but if he could get a
building permit and the City paid him for the right of way, he would be satisfied.
Mr. Patrick Horkin questioned Mr. Carr if in his opinion theSaint Pius
Catholic Church property would be enhanced to the same extent as other lots in
Meadowbrook which abut on Gollihar, and Mr. Carr stated in his opinion this property
would be enhanced more on the basis that the Church property gets a great deal of
influence from Gollihar regardless of frontage; that it is a large tract of land
and in itself is a large influence in the neighborhood; that the added convenience
to the parishioners would be an enhancement, and that in his opinion the improve-
ments would be a definite enhancement to the property. He further pointed out
that if the property should in the future be sold and ceased to be used for church
purposes, its greatest influence would come from Gollihar Street. Mr. Horkin com-
mented that Catholic churches, as a rule, do not cease to exist as Catholic
churches, to which Mr. Carr agreed, but stated his opinion was unchanged that the
property would be enhanced at least in the amount of the assessment, and that its
public benefit would be of benefit to the users of the Church.
Mrs. Guy Winstead, 917 Airline Road, asked Mr. Carr to state a value per
square foot on her property identified as Items 729 and #29A, and City Manager
Townsend advised that Mr. Carr's assignment is only to determine if property so
assessed would be enhanced at least to the amount of the assessment,
Mayor Sizemore invited those in the audience whose properties appear on the
preliminary assessment roll to state their objections, if any, to the assessments.
Mr. Horkin, speaking on behalf of the St. Pius Catholic X Church, Item #27,
opposed the assessments on Lot B, Meadowbrook Unit 4, on the basis that the prop-
erty fronts on St. Pius Drive, and that the Paving Coordinator has prepared an
Minutes
REgular Council Meeting
May 17, 1972
Page 15
assessment rate on the basis of the church property fronting on Gollihar Road.
He stated he feels that according to the City ordinance, the Church is legally
obliged to pay only 50% of the rate for sidewalks, curb and gutter, and 100% of
the cost of the single driveway entering the property from Gollihar Road, and that
this resolves itself to a point of law. Mr. Horkin filed his comments in writing
for official record.
Mr. Curtis Haley, Item #2, Lot 22, Block 7, Windsor Park Unit 1, spoke in
opposition to the project in general but more specifically was opposed to the
sidewalks. He stated he does not feel these improvements are needed; that his
property is for rental purposes, and that the sidewalks would not benefit anyone.
Mr. Roland G. Walker, Item x`16, Lot 16, Block 7, Meadowbrook Unit 3,
stated he did not oppose the improvement project, but raised the question of park-
ing regulations around King High School during school hours. Mr. Lontos explained
that no parking would be allowed on the street with the exception of along the
school for loading and unloading; explained the extra width in front of the school
for this purpose, stating that parking would only be allowed on one side of the
street at this point.
Mr. Winstead complained that he will be deprived of parking which will
further damage his property; that he owned the ground before it was platted; and
that he had originally donated the right of way and had not been paid for it.
No one else appeared to be heard in connection with the proposed street
improvements.
Motion by Stark, seconded by Bosquez and passed, that the hearing be
closed.
Motion by Bonniwell, seconded by Lozano and passed, that approval of
assessments for Gollihar Road Improvements from Caddo to Airline Road, be deferred
for further consideration pending a legal determination of whether or not the
Saint Pius X Catholic Church Property, Item #27, sides or fronts on Gollihar.
five zoning applications, and explained the procedure to be wed.
City Manager Townsend presented Ap cation 7�C472 -2, The Planning Commis-
sion, for change of zoning R -1B" One - family Dwelling District to "B -4"
General Bus' s District, on a portion of Lot 3, Oso Farm Tracts (Herman Waters
There being no further testimony offered or any further parties
appearing to be heard, upon proper motion, duly seconded and unanimously
carried, the said hearing was declared closed; and
WHEREAS, no further parties appearing and no further testimony
being offered as to the special benefits in relation to the enhanced value
of said abutting property as compared to cost of the improvements of said
portion of said street- proposed to be assessed against said property, or
as to any errors, invalidities or irregularities, in the proceeding or
contract heretofore had in reference to the portions of said street-. to
be -improved; - -and
WHEREAS, said City Council has heard evidence as to the special
benefits and enhanced value to accrue to said abutting property, and the
real and true owner or owners thereof, as compared with the cost of making
said improvements on said street. within the limits above defined, and has
heard all parties appearing and offering testimony, together with all pro-
tests and objections relative to such matters and as to any errors, invalidi-
ties or irregularities in any of the proceedings and contract for said im-
provements, and has given a full and.fair hearing to all parties making or.
desiring to make any such protest, objection or offer testimony and has
fully examined and considered all evidence, matters, objections and protests
offered and based upon said evidence, testimony and statements, said City
Council finds that each and every parcel of property abutting upon the
portion of the street. aforesaid within the limits to be improved as herein
defined, will be enhanced in value and specially benefited by the construe-
tion of said improvements upon the said street upon which said property
abuts, in an amount in excess of the amount of the cost of said improvements
- proposed to be, and as hereinbelow assessed against each and every said
parcel of abutting property, and the real and true owners thereof, and said
City Council did consider and correct all errors, invalidities or deficiencies
called to its attention and did find that all proceedings and contracts were
proper and in accordance with the Charter of said City and the laws of the
State of Texas, under which those proceedings were being had, and the pro-
ceedings of said City Council heretofore had with reference to such improve-
ments, and in all respects to be valid and regular; and said City Council
M
did further find upon said evidence that the assessments hereinbelow made
and the charges hereby declared against said abutting property on the
portions of the street.- hereinabove described, within the limits defined,
and the real and true owner or owners thereof, are just and equitable and
did adopt the rule of apportionment set out below and the division of the
cost of said improvements between said abutting properties, and the real and
true owner or owners thereof, as just and equitable, and as producing sub-
stantial equality considering the benefits to be received and the burdens
Imposed thereby, and that all objections and protests should be overruled
and denied except the corrections and changes as appear on the final assess-
ment roll included in this ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That there being no further protest or testimony for
or against said improvements, said hearing granted to the and true
owners of abutting property on said street , within the limits above defined,
and to all persons, firms, corporations and estates, owning or claiming
same or any interest therein, be and the same is hereby closed and all
protests and objections, whether specifically mentioned or not, shall be,
and the same are hereby overruled and denied.
SECTION 2. That said City Council hereby finds and determines
upon the evidence heard in reference to each and every parcel or property
abutting upon the aforesaid street , within the limits defined, that the
special benefits in the enhanced value to accrue to said property and the
real and true owner or owners thereof, by virtue of the construction of
said improvements to said portion of said street• upon which said property
abuts, will be in excess of the amount of the cost of said improvements
as proposed to be, and as herein assessed against said abutting property
and the real and true owners thereof, and finds that the apportionment of
the cost of said improvements, and that all assessments hereinbelow made
are just and equitable and produce substantial equality considering the
benefits received and the burdens imposed thereby, and are in accordance
with the Laws of the State of Texas, and the Charter provisions of the City
-5-
of Corpus Christi, Texas, and that the proceedings and contract heretofore
had with reference to said improvements are in all respects regular,-proper
and valid, and that all prerequisites to the fixing of the assessment liens
against said abutting properties, as hereinabove described and the personal
liability of the real and true owner or owners thereof, whether named or
correctly named herein or not have been in all things regularly had and
performed in compliance with the law, Charter provisions and proceedings of
the said City Council.
SECTION 3. That in pursuance of said ordinances, duly enacted
by said City Council, authorizing and ordering the improvements of the above
described street, within the limits defined, and in pursuance of said
proceedings heretofore had and enacted by said City Council, in reference
to said improvements and by virtue of the powers vested in said City with
respect to said street improvements by the laws of the State of Texas and
the Charter of said City, with particular reference to Chapter 106 of the
Acts of the First Called Session of the 40th Legislature of the State of
Texas, known and shown as Article 1105B of Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes
of Texas, as amended, there shall be, and is hereby levied, assessed and
taxed against the respective parcels.of property abutting upon said portion
of said street , and against the real and true-owners thereof, whether such
real and true owner or owners be named or correctly named herein or not,
the several sums of money hereinbelow mentioned and itemized opposite the
description of the respective parcels of said property, the number of front
feet of each and the several amounts assessed against same and the real and
true owner or owners thereof, and names of the apparent owners thereof, all
as corrected and adjusted by said City Council, being as follows, to -wit:
-6-
/� ASSESSMENT ROLL
GOLLIHAR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS FROM CADDO TO AIRLINE ROAD
The street is to be constructed by excavating to a width and depth to permit
the laying of standard 6" curb and gutter sections, and the installation of
pavement consisting as follows:
6" lime stabilized base, 8" compacted caliche, prime coat, 3" of Type B
Asphaltic Concrete and 1" of Type D Asphaltic Concrete for a normal ef-
fective width of 59' measured from back of curbs.
Also to be constructed on this project are reinforced concrete sidewalks vary-
ing in width from 6' wide along schools to the normal 4' wide 4" thick, drive-
ways where needed and requested by property owners and storm sewers to properly
drain the streets. In addition, storm sewer extensions in Brock and Bradshaw
are included to alleviate a drainage problem.
The assessment rates have been determined by taking the unit prices used in the
low bid submitted by Burtex Constructors and applying these unit prices to the
front footage of the abutting properties in accordance with the assessment policy.
The rates are as follows:
1.
Curb & Gutter & Pavement
(standard rate)
$10.873
2.
Curb & Gutter & Pavement
for Lot 1, Block C.
South Staples Center
$13.986
3.
Curb & Gutter & Pavement
for Lot C -2,
Habluetzel Tract
$14.797
4.
Curb & Gutter & Pavement
for Lot D -11
Habluetzel Tract
$13.691
5.
Sidewalks
$ 0.571
50% assessed
$ 0.285
6.
Driveways
$ 1.012
7.
Header Curb
$ 3.50
8.
Properties that are being used for residential
purposes are assessed the maximum rate established
by Ordinance. This rate
is $4.75 per L.F.
Credits have been given for existing improvements such as curbs,, gutters, and
pavements as well as sidewalks where they exist.
TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE $274,180.87
7L , 7�
TOTAL, ESTIMATED ASSESSMENTS
TOTAL COST - CITY'S PORTION $233;066:04
Page
" ITEM
NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
a
, DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
GOLLIHfR
ROAD
CAIDO
STREET TC
AIRLINE ROAD
NORTH
SIDE
1.
B. Wiley Mayden Company
]16.84 LF
C,G, Pvmt.
3.986
1,634.12
437 Sheridan
403.36 SF
Sidewalk
0.571
230.32
Lot 1, Block C
194.45 SF
Driveway
1.012
196.78
South Staples Center
2,061.22
2.
J.S. Daugherty
86.50 IF
Pavement & CG'
2.375
205.44
792 Collingswood
466.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
132.81
Lot 23, Block 3
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Windsor Park Unit 1
338.25
(Collingsw
od Drive)
3.
James R. McClintock
86.50 LF
Pavement & CG
2.375
205.44
793 Collingswood
466.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
132.81
Lot 22, Block 4
-0 -- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Windsor Park Unit 4
338.25
4.
R. L. Bleakley
86.50 LF
Pavement & CG
2.375
205.44
910 Stirman
426.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
121.41
Lot 23, Block 4
158.45 SF
Driveway
1.012
160.35
Windsor Park Unit 1
6.00 SF
Sidewalk (F)
0.571
3.43
490.63
(Lansdo
Drive)
Page
ITEM
NO.
OWNER AND
J,'ROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
I DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
GOLLIHAR
ROAD
CAIDO
STREET TC
AIRLINE ROAD
NORTH
31DE
5.
William W. Ward
86.50 IF
Pavement & CG
2.375
205.44
781 Lansdown
1+66.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
132.81
Lot 21, Block 7
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Windsor Park Unit 1
8.00 SF
Sidewalk (F)
0.571
4.57
342.82
6.
C. F. Haley
86.50 IF
Pavement & CG
2.375
205.44
782 Sharon
426.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
121.41
Lot 22, Block 7
158.45 SF
Driveway
1.012
160.35
Windsor Park Unit 1
12.00 SF
Sidewalk (F)
0.571
6.85
494.05
(Sharon
rive)
7..
Erwin J. Roberts
86.50 IF
Pavement & CG
2.375
205.44
-
781 Sharon
394.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
112.29
Lot 21, Block 8
270.45 SF
Driveway
1.012
273.70
Windsor Park Unit 1
20.00 SF
Sidewalk (F)
0.571
11.42
602.85
8.
Guadalupe Escamilla
116.00 LF
C,G, Pvmt.
2.375
275.50
782 Ashland
464.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
132.24
-
Lot 22, Block 8
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Windsor Park Unit 2
42.00 SF
Sidewalk (F)
0.571
23.98
431.72
(Ashlan
Drive) _ -
-
Page
ITEM
NO.
'
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
d
i DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
GOLLIHf
R ROAD
CAD
0 STREET TO
AIRLINE ROAD
NORTH SIDE
9.
Ophia Ellis
115.50 IF
C,G, Pvmt.
2.375
274.31
10 Plaza Sq., Apt. 1440
462.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
131.67
St. Louis, Missouri 63103
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Lot 21, Block 10
42.00 SF
Sidewalk (F)
0.571
23.98
Windsor Park Unit 2
429.96
10.
Theodore I. Smith
115.50 IF
C,G, Pvmt.
2.375
274.31
788 Sheridan
386.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
110.01
Lot 22, Block 10
246.45 SF
Driveway
1.012
249.41
Windsor Park Unit 2
42.00 SF
Sidewalk (F)'
0.571
23.98
657.71
(Sherid
Drive)
-
11.
Mary Etta Bomba
116.50 IF
C,G, Pvmt.
2.375
276.69
777 Sheridan
466.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
132.81
Lot 21, Block 11
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Windsor Park Unit 2
42.00 SF
Sidewalk (F)
0.571
23.98
433.48
12.
C.C. Thomas
116.50 IF
C,G, Pvmt.
2.375
276.69
782 Chase
418.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
119.13
Lot 22, Block 11
162.45 SF
Driveway
1.012
164.40
Windsor Park Unit 3
22.00 SF
Sidewalk (F)
0.571
12.56
572.78
(Chase
rive)
Page 4
ITEM
NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
; DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
GOLLIIU
R ROAD
CAIDO
STREET TC
AIRLINE ROAD
NORTH
3IDE
13.
J. J. Parker
116.50 LF
C,G, Pvmt.
2.375
276.69
781 Chase
466.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
132.81
Lot 21, Block 14
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Windsor Park Unit 3
22.00 SF
Sidewalk (F)
0.571
12.56
422.o6
14.
Bruce A. Bayerlein
116.50 LF
C,G, Pvmt.
2.375
276.69
782 Pennington
426.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
121.41
Lot 22, Block 14
138.45 SF
Driveway
1.012
140.11
Windsor Park Unit 3
18.00 SF
Sidewalk (F)
0.571
10.28
548.49
(Penningt
Drive)
15.
Mrs. Larry Hunt
u6.50 LF
C,G, Pvmt.
2.375
276.69
781 Pennington
466.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
132.81
Lot 21, Block 15
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Windsor Park Unit 3
18.00 SF
Sidewalk (F)
0.571
10.28
419.78
16.
Roland G. Walker
117.68 LF
C,G, Pvmt.
2.375
279.49
762 Monette
470.72 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
134.16
Lot 16, Block 7
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Meadowbrook Unit 3
413.65
( Monette
Drive) - _
_
Page 5
ITEM
NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
9
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
GOLL
ROAD
CAIDO
STREET TO
AIRLINE ROAD
NORTH
31DE
17.
Phillip M. Wal_lock
116.00 LF
C,G, Pvmt.
2.375
275.50
761 Monette
464.00 SF
sidewalk
0.285
132.24
Lot 1, Block 8
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Meadowbrook Unit 3
407.74
18. "Herbert
J. Lehn
116.00 IF
C,G, Pvmt.
2.375
275.50
718 Burkshire
464.00 SF
Sidewalk
0,285
132,24
Lot 32, Block 8
-0-
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Meadowbrook Unit 3
407,74
(Burkshi
Drive)
19.
Richard T. Battles
116.00 LF
C,G, Pvmt.
2.375
275.50
757 Burkshire
464.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
132.24
Lot 1, Block 9
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Meadowbrook Unit 3
407.74
20.
Melvin L. Faw
116.00 LF
C,G, Pvmt.
2.375
275.50
762 Meadowbrook
464.00 SF
Sidewalk
0,285
132,24
Lot 24, Block 9
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Meadowbrook Unit 3
407.74
(Meadowbro
)k Drive)
Page 6
ITEM
NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
9
i DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
GOLLIHAI
ROAD
CAD
DO STREET TO
AIRLINE ROAD
NORTH
3IDE
21.
Gene S. Villarreal
116.00 IF
C,G, Pvmt.
2.375
275.50
761 Meadowbrook
464.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
132.24
Lot 2, Block 10
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Meadowbrook Unit 3
407.74
22.
"Henry H. Wade
116:00'LF
C;G, Pvmt.
2.375
275.50
766 Brock
464.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
132.24
Lot 1, Block 10
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
. -0-
Meadowbrook Unit 3
407.74
(Brock
)rive)
23.
Roy H. Markwardt
116.00 IF
C,G, Pvmt.
2.375
275.50
765 Brock
464.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
132.24
Lot 2, Block 11
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Meadowbrook Unit 3
407.74
24.
L. M. Atkins
116.00 IF
C,G, Pvmt.
2.375
275.50
758 Bradshaw
464.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
132.24
Lot 1; Block 11
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Meadowbrook Unit 3
407.74
(Bradshaw
Drive)
Page 7
a
ITEM
OWNER AND
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
NO.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
ASSESSED
OF
RATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT
ASSESSED
GOLLIHA.1
ROAD
C
0 STREET TO
AIRLINE ROAD
NORTH
31DE
25.
John C. Wyeth
116.00 IF
C,G, Pvmt.
2.375
275.50
761 Bradshaw
464.o0 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
132.24
Lot 1, Block 14
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Meadowbrook Unit 3
407.74
26.
'Norma Van Loh Barlow
116.00 IF
C,G, Pvmt.
2.375
275.50
766 St. Pius
464.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
132.24
Lot 14, Block 14
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Meadowbrook Unit 3
407.74
(St. Pius
Drive)
' -27.
Saint.Pius X Catholic
392.19 IF'
C,G, Pvmt.
°�'cv�
Church
1448.76 SF
Sidewalk
0.571
747 St. Pius
543.45 SF
Driveway
1.012
549.97
Lot B
Meadowbrook Unit 4
•
/BYJ�m�
`
28.
H. D. Detterman
140.00 IF
C,G, Pvmt.
2.375
332.50
841 Lum
480.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
136.80
Lot 1, Block 9
*29.26 SF
Driveway *
1.012
29.61
Koolside Addition
498.91
*Credit Existing Drivewa
(Lum Alnue)
Page 8
ITEM
NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
� DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
GOLLIH
2 ROAD
C
DO STREET T
AIRLINE ROAD
•
NORTH
SIDE
29.
Guy D. & Ruby Winstead
140.00 LF
C, G, Pvmt.
2.375
332.50
917 Airline
560.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285'
159.60
Lot 14, Block 8
492.10
Koolside Addition
29 -A'
Guy D. & Ruby Winstead
486.90 SF
Driveway (F)
1.012
492.74
917 Airline
45.00 LF
Sidewalk Curb
3.500
157.50
Lot 15, Block 8
108.47 LF
C,G, Pvmt. (F)
10.873
1,179.39
Koolside Addition
291.00 SF
Sidewalk (F)
0.571
166.16
1,995-79
30.
Ronald C. & Joseph V.
135.00 LF
C,G, Pvmt. (F)
10.873
1,467.86
Fuedo
640.00 SF
Sidewalk (F)
0.571
365.44
831 Airline
250.29 SF
Driveway (F)
1.012
253.29
Lot 1, Block 8
76.00 LF
Sidewalk Curb
3.500
266.00
Koolside Addition
2,352.59
(Airlin
Road)
(Go
Llihax Road
d North Side)
Page c)
ITEM
NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
3
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
GOLLIHAi
ROAD
CAD
DO STREET TO
AIRLINE ROAD
SOUTH
3IDE
31.
Martin B. Pigott, Jr.
39.00 IF
C,G, Pvmt.
14.797
577.08
4322 South Staples
4.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.571
2.28
Lot c -2
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Habluetzer Tract
579.36
32.
Mrs. Elsie A. Gelback
83.00 IF
C,G, Pvmt.
13.691
1,136.35
4328 South Staples
332.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.571
189.57
Lot d -;
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Habluetzer Tract
1,325.92
(Collings wo
d Drive)
(Mustang
Trail)
33•
Corpus Christi Independent
1338.56 IF
C,G, Pvmt. (F)
4.75
6,358.16
School District
6498.36 SF
Sidewalk (F)
0.571
3,710.56
515 North Carancahua
1589.00 SF
Driveway (F)
1.012
1,608.07
Park Plaza School Tract
11,676.79
(Meadowbro
k Drive)
-
34.
George Rahn
107.00 LF
C,G, Pvmt.
2.375
254.12
902 Meadowbrook
-0- SF
Sidewalk
0.285
-0-
Lot.14, Block 7
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Park Plaza Add. Unit 1
254,12
35.
Floyd P. Butler
107.00 IF
CA, Pvmt.
2.375
254.12
901 Brock
-0- SF
Sidewalk
0.285
-0-
Lot 13, Block 7
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Park Plaza Add. Unit 1
254.12
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
CA
Abel Chapa
902 Brock.
.Lot_13, Block 4
Park Plaza Add. Unit 1
Terrance C. O'Brien
901 Bradshaw
Lot 14," Block 4
Park Plaza Add. Unit 1
Harry A. Wright
902 Bradshaw
Lot 11, Block 3
Park Plaza Add. Unit 1
Gerald S. Plougher
901 Zarsky
Lot 1, Block 4
Green Acres Village
*Credit Existing Curb an
• �I
RATE
2.375
0.285
1. 012
2.375
0.285
1.012
2.375
0.285
1.012
2.375
0.285
1.012
Fag(
AMOUNT
254.12
-0-
-0-
2'54.12
-0-
-0-
254.12
-0-
-0-
182.87
-0-
-0-
u
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
ASSESSED
OP
ASSESSMENT
GOLLIHA
ROAD
0 STREET TO
AIRLINE ROAD
SOUTH
IDE
(Brock
)rive)
107.00 LF
C,G, Pvmt.
-0- SF
Sidewalk
-0- SF
Driveway
107.00 LF
C,G, Pvmt.
-0- SF
Sidewalk
-0- SF
Driveway
(Bradshaz
Drive)
107.00 LF
C,G, Pvmt.
-0- SF
Sidewalk
-0- SF
Driveway
C, G * (309
77.00 LF
Pavement & CG
-0- SF
Sidewalk
-0- SF
Driveway
i Gutter
( Zarsky
rive)
RATE
2.375
0.285
1. 012
2.375
0.285
1.012
2.375
0.285
1.012
2.375
0.285
1.012
Fag(
AMOUNT
254.12
-0-
-0-
2'54.12
-0-
-0-
254.12
-0-
-0-
182.87
-0-
-0-
Page 11
ITEM
NO
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
5
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
GOIJjIHA3
ROAD
CAI
DO STREET TO
AIRLINE ROAD
SOUTH
3IDE
40.
Stanley Steve Konarik
C,G * (30')
902 Zarsky
77.00 IF
Pavement & CG
2.375
182.87
Lot 1, Block 1
-0- SF
Sidewalk
0.285
-0-
Green Acres Village
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
10.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.571
5.71
*Credit Existing Curb aid
Gutter
188.58
41.
Windsor Park Baptist
C, G * (301)
Church
77.00 IF
Pavement
2.375
182.87
506 Chase
-0- SF
Sidewalk
0.285
-0-
Lot 11, Block 9
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
Green Acres Village No. 2
182.87
*Credit Existing Curb ari
Gutter
(Salem
)rive)
42.
John Henry Si.ebe--t
C, G * (30' )
902 Salem
77.00 IF
Pavement & CG
2.375
182.87
Lot 11, Block 10
-0- SF
Sidewalk
0.285
-0-
Green Acres Village No. 2
-0- SF
Driveway
1.012
-0-
*Credit Existing Curb ani
Gutter
182.87
43.
Sheldon Jennings
140.00 IF
C,G, Pvmt.
2.375
332.50
901 Lum
480.00 SF
Sidewalk
0.285
136.80
Lot 11, Block 10
-0- SF
Driveway *
1.012
-0-
Koolside Addition
4,69-30
*Credit Existing Drivewsr
(Lum A
nue)
Page 12
913.33
0.571
p
1.012
-0-
ITEM
OWNER AND
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
10.873
565.40
TOTAL
NO.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
ASSESSED
OF
RATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
713.86
ASSESSMENT
ASSESSED
GOLLIHffi
ROAD
CAD
)O STREET TO
AIRLINE ROAD
SOUTH
31DE
44.
Lilliput School, Inc.
145.50 IF
C,G, Pvmt. (F)
10.873
1,582.02
Mrs. Genevieve Reddam
-0- SF
Sidewalk
-0-
-0-
506 Brock
-0- SF
Driveway
-0-
-0-
45.
46.
Lot 21 & 22, Block 7
Koolside Addition
R. 0. Woodson
Gibson Discount Store
1330 Kostoryz
Lot 26, Block 6
Koolside Addition
Phillips Mkt. Service
2100 Lipan
Lot 25, Block 6
Koolside Addition
(Dorthy treet)
84.00 IF C,G, Pvmt. (F)
336.00 SF Sidewalk (F)
-0- SF Driveway
52.00 IF
260.00 SF
-0- SF
Road E
C,G, Pvmt. (F)
Sidewalk (F)
Driveway
Road)
d South Side)
1,582.02
lo.873
913.33
0.571
191.86
1.012
-0-
1,105.19
10.873
565.40
0.571
148.46
1.012
-0-
713.86
Total IQ`7 7Y
SECTION 4. Be it further ordained that in the event the actual
frontage of any property herein assessed shall be found upon the completion
of said improvements to be greater or less than the number of feet herein -
above stated, the assessments herein set against any such property and
against the real and true owner or owners thereof, shall be, and the same
are hereby declared to be increased or decreased as the case may be, in
the proportion which said excess or deficiency or frontage shall bear to
the whole number of front feet of property actually improved in accordance
with the front foot rule or rate of assessment herein adopted, it being the
intention that such parcel of property and the real and true owner or owners
thereof abutting on the portion of the street above described, within the
limits defined, shall pay for said improvements under the "FRONT FOOT RULE
OR PLAN ", which rule or plan is hereby found and determined to be just and
equitable and to produce a substantial equality, having in view the special
benefits to be received and the burdens imposed thereby; and it is further
ordainee that upon final completion and acceptance of said improvements on
the aforesaid street., within the limits defined all certificates herein-
after provided fo -, issued to evidence said assessments against said parcels
of property abutting upon said street, and the real and true owner or owners
thereof, shall be issued in accordance with, and shall evidence the actual
frontage of said property and the actual cost of said improvements, the
amount named in said certificate in no case to exceed the amount herein
assessed against such property unless such increase be caused by an excess
of front footage over the amount hereinabove stated, such actual cost and
-such actual number of front feet, if different from the hereinabove shown
In Section 3 hereof, to be determined by the Director of Engineering Services
upon completion of said work on said street, and the findings of the Director
of Engineering Services shall be final and binding upon all parties concerned.
SECTION 5. That the several sums mentioned above in Section 3
hereof assessed against said parcels of property abutting on the aforesaid
street , within the limits defined, and the real and true owners thereof,
whether named or correctly named herein or not, subject to the provisions
of Section 4 thereof, together with interest thereon at the rate of six
-7-
and one -half (6 -1/2 %) per annum with reasonable attorney's fee and all costs
and expenses of collection, if incurred, are hereby declared to be made a
first and prior lien upon the respective parcels of property, against which
same are assessed from and after the date said improvements were ordered by
said City Council, to -wit: April 19., 1972, and a personal liability and
charge against the real and true owner or owners be named.or correctly named
herein, and that said lien shall be and constitute the first and prior enforce-
able claim against the property assessed and shall be a first and paramount
lien superior to all other liens, claims or title, except for lawful ad valorem
taxes; and that the same so assessed shall be paid and become payable in one
.-,of; the., following ,methods:at�the_option.of thesproperty „owner:
1. All in cash within 20 days after completion or acceptance
by the City; or
2. Twenty percent (20 %) cash within twenty days after the
completion of said work and its acceptance by the City,
and 20% respectively on or before one year, two years,
three years and four years after the completion of said
work and its acceptance by the City, with interest from
day of such completion and acceptance by the City until
paid at the rate of 6 -1/2% per annum; or _
3. Payments to be made in maximum of 60 equal installments,
the first of which shall be paid within 20 days after the
completion of said improvement, and the acceptance there-
of by the City, and the balance to be paid in 59 equal
consecutive monthly installments commencing on the 1st
day of the next succeeding month and continuing there-
after on the 1st day of each succeeding month until the
entire sum is paid in full, together with interest from
the date of said completion and acceptance by the City,
until paid, at the rate of six and one -half percent
(6 -1/2 %) per annum; provided, however, that the owners
of said property availing themselves of Option "2” or
"3" above shall have the privilege of paying one, or
IM
all, of such installments at any time before maturity
thereof by paying the total amount of principal due,
together with interest accrued, to the date of payment.
SECTION 6. That for the purpose of evidencing said assessments,
the liens securing same and the several sums assessed against the said
parcels of property and the real and true owner or owners thereof and the
time and terms of payment, and to aid in the enforcement thereof, assign-
able certificates shall be issued by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas to
itself upon the completion of said improvements in said street, and acceptance
thereof by said City Council, which certificates shall be executed by the
a,,14ayor•.in- the,name <of the,City,,- attested *by the,GityaSecretary, -with the
corporate seal of said City, and which certificates shall declare the amounts
of said assessments and the times and terms thereof, the rate of interest
thereon, the date of the completion and acceptance of the improvements for
which the certificate is issued, and shall contain the names of the apparent
true owner or owners as accurately as possible, and the description of the
property assessed by lot and block number, or front foot thereof, or such
other description as may otherwise identify the same, and if the said pro-
perty shall be owned by an estate or'firm, then to so state the fact shall
be sufficient and no error or mistake in describing such property or in
giving the name of any owner or owners, or otherwise, shall in anywise
invalidate or impair the assessment levied hereby or the certificate issued
In evidence thereof.
That said certificate shall further provide substantially that
if default shall be made in the payment of any installment of principal or
interest when due, then ai the option of the City, its successors, or assigns,
or the holder thereof, the whole of said assessment evidenced thereby shall
at once become due and payable, and shall be collectible with reasonable
attorney's fees and all expenses and costs of collection, if incurred, and
said certificate shall set forth and evidence the personal liability of the
real and true owner or owners of such property, whether named or correctly
named therein or not, and the lien upon such property, and that said lien
is first and paramount thereon, superior to all other liens, titles and
-9-
charges, except for lawful ad valorem taxes, from and after the date said
improvements were ordered by said City Council, to -wit: April 19, 1972,
and shall provide in effect that if default shall be made in the payment
thereof, the same may be enforced, at the option of the City, or their
successors and assigns, by the sale of the property therein described in
the manner provided for the collection of ad valorem taxes as above recited,
or by suit in any Court having jurisdiction.
That said certificates shall further recite in effect that all
the proceedings with reference to making said improvements have been regularly
had in compliance with the law and Charter in force in said City and the
proceedings of said City Council of said City, and that all prerequisites
to the fixing of the assessment lien against the property therein described,
or attempted to be described, and the personal liability of the real and true
owner or owners thereof, evidenced by such certificates, have been regularly
done and performed, which recitals shall be evidence of all the matters and
facts so recited and no further proof thereof shall be required in any Court.
That said certificates shall further provide in effect that the
City of Corpus Christi, Texas, shall exercise all of its lawful powers, in
the enforcement and collection thereof, and said certificates may contain
other and further recitals, pertinent and appropriate thereto. It shall not
be necessary that said certificates shall be in the exact form as above set
forth, but the substance and effect thereof shall suffice.
SECTION 7. That all such assessments levied are a personal liability
and charge against the real and true owner or owners of the property described,
or attempted to be described, notwithstanding such owner or owners may not
be named or correctly named, and any irregularity in the name of the property
owner, or the description of any property or the amount of any assessment,
or in any other matter or thing shall not in anywise invalidate or impair
any assessment levied hereby or any certificate issued, and such mistake, or
error, invalidity or irregularity whether, in such assessment or in the
certificate issued in evidence thereof, may be, but is not required to be,
to be enforceable, at any time corrected by the said City Council of the City
of Corpus Christi. Further that the omission of said improvements in front of
-10-
any part or parcel of property abutting upon the aforementioned street, which
is exempt from the lien of said assessment, shall in no wise affect or impair
the validity of assessments against the other parcels of property abutting
upon said street; and that the total amounts assessed against the respective
parcels of property abutting upon said street,, within the limits herein
defined and the real and true owner or owners thereof, are the same as, or
less than, the estimate of said assessment prepared by the Director of
Engineering Services and approved and adopted by said City Council and are in
accordance with the proceedings of said City Council relative to said improve-
ments and assessments thereof, and with the terms, powers and provisions of
said Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First - Called Session of the 40th Legislature
of the State of Texas, known as Article 1105B of Vernon's Annotated Civil
Statutes of Texas and the Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, under
which terms, powers and provisions said proceedings, said improvements and
assessments were had and made by said City Council.
SECTION 8. The importance to the public of determining the assess-
ments against property owners and thereby enabling construction to proceed
as promptly as possible creates a public emergency and imperative public
necessity requiring the suspension of the Charter rule that no ordinance or
resolution shall be passed finally on the date of its introduction but that
such ordinance or resolution shall be read at three several meetings of the
City Council, and the Mayor having declared such emergency and necessity to
exist, and having requested the suspension of the Charter rule and that this
ordinance be passed finally on the date of its introduction and take effect
and be in full force and effect from and after its passage, IT IS ACCORDINGLY
SO ORDAINED, this the 24th day of May, 1972.
ATTEST;
/ J
Cit37-SecretarNI / MAYOR
! THE CITY OF CO U CHRISTI, TEXAS
APPROVED:
/ Day of May, 1972:
Aelxe
C ty A�tt`ofr`neey _
- - _v ..c .- .a.. a5.t. x�a��_.•. -44 s•n ;=y-k P ^oai�.. . - ,.. °:'-. -,f ^� :.5,�.".. •.s ;ia. ,., k�. '-, -.. _ -.,_
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS �7
j DAY OF , 19 /
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS -
FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE OF THE FOREGOING
ORDINANCE, A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND IMPERATIVE NECESSITY EXIST FOR THE SUSPEN-
SION OF THE CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT THAT NO ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL
13E PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED, AND THAT SUCH ORDINANCE OR
RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL; I, THEREFORE,
REQUEST THAT YOU SUSPEND SAID CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT AND PASS THIS ORDI-
NANCE FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED, OR AT THE PRESENT MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL.
RE TFULLY,
.O
MAYOR
THE CITY OF CORPS HRISTI, TEXAS
V
THE CHARTER RULE WAS SUSPENDED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
RONNIE SIZEMORE
CHARLES A. BONNIWELL ✓
- ROBERTO BOSQUEZ, M.D. ✓
REV. HAROLD T. BRANCH t/ i
. > THOMAS V. GONZA LES
GAGE L02AN0, SR. (�
J. HOWARD STARK
THE ABOVE ORDINANCE WAS PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
RONNIE SIZE MORE
CHARLES A. BONNIWELL f
( ROBERTO BOSQUEZ, M.D. ✓
REV. HAROLD T. BRANCH ✓
THOMAS V. GONZALES /✓ '
GAGE LO ZANO, SR.
J. HOWARD STARK ry