HomeMy WebLinkAbout11066 ORD - 09/06/1972JRR:ml:9- 5- 72;1!,t
AN ORDINANCE
CLOSING THE HEARING ON STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE
FOLLOWING STREETS:
1. Airport Road from a point 195 + L.F. south of the Morgan
Avenue -Old Brownsville Road Intersection to a point 500 +
L.F. north of the Morgan Avenue -Old Brownsville Road
Intersection
2. Morgan Avenue from Vera Cruz to the intersection of
Airport Road
3. Old Brownsville Road from the intersection of Airport
Road westward approximately 650 L.F.
4. South Staples Street, from 18th Street southeast to
Annapolis Drive
5. Swantner Street, from 18th Street southeast to Annapolis Drive
AND FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PROPERTY ABUTTING
SAID STREETS WILL BE SPECIFICALLY BENEFITED AND
ENHANCED IN VALUE IN-EXCESS OF COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS
AND LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT; FIXING A LIEN AND CHARGE,
THE MANNER AND TIME OF PAYMENT AND COLLECTION; AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the City Council of Corpus Christi, Texas, by duly
enacted ordinance passed and approved on the 26th day of July, 1972,
determined the necessity for, and ordered the improvement of the following
streets•
1. Airport Road from a point 795-+ L.F. south of the Morgan
Avenue -Old Brownsville Road Intersection to a point 500 ±
L.F. north of the Morgan Avenue -Old Brownsville Road
Intersection
2. Morgan Avenue from Vera Cruz to the intersection of
Airport Road
3. Old Brownsville Road from the intersection of Airport
Road
4. South Staples Street, from 18th Street southeast to
Annapolis Drive
5. Swantner Street, from 18th.Street southeast to Annapolis Drive
in the manner and according to the plans and specifications heretofore
approved and adopted by the City Council by Ordinance dated July 26, 1972,
a duly executed notice of said ordinance having been filed in the name of
the said City with the County Clerk of Nueces County, Texas; and
WHEREAS, the said City Council has caused the Director of Engineer-
ing Services to prepare and file estimates of the cost of such improvements
and estimates of the amount per front foot proposed to be assessed against
the property abutting upon a portion of the aforesaid streets within the
11066
6
limit herein defined, to be improved, and the real and true owners thereof,
and said Director of Engineering Services has heretofore filed said estimates
and a statement of other matters relating thereto with said City Council,
and same has been received, examined and approved by said City Council; and
WHEREAS, said City Council, by duly enacted ordinance dated July
26, 1972, did determine the necessity of levying an assessment for that
portion of the cost of constructing said improvements on the above -named
streets, within the limits herein defined, to be paid by the abutting
property and the real and true owners thereof, and by ordinance dated July
26, 1972, did order and set a hearing to be held at City Hall, on the 23rd
day of August, 1972, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, in the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, for the real and true owners of the property
abutting upon said streets, within the limits above defined, and for all
other owning or claiming any interest in, or otherwise interested in said
property, or any of said matters as to the assessments and amounts to be
assessed against each parcel or abutting property and the real and true
owner or owners thereof, and as to the special benefits to accrue to said
abutting property by virtue of said improvements, if any, or concerning any
error, invalidity, irregularity or deficiency in any proceedings, or contract,
to appear and be heard in person or by counsel and offer evidence in reference
to said matters; and the City Council did by said ordinance order and direct
the City to give notice of said hearing to the owners abutting upon said
street as shown by the current ad valorem tax roll by mailing such notice
to such owners and publishing said notice at least three times in the Corpus
Christi Times before the date of the hearing, such notice of mail and by
publication being in compliance with the provisions of Article 1105b of
Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas; and
WHEREAS, such notice was given said owners of property as shown
on the current ad valorem tax roll within the limits of the street being
improved by mailing such notice at least fourteen (14) days prior to the
hearing to such owners and by publishing three times notice of such hearing
in the Corpus Christi Times, the first of which publication was at least
twenty -one (21) days prior to the date of said hearing; both forms of notice
-2-
being in compliance with and containing the information required by Article
1105b, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes; and
WHEREAS, after due, regular and proper notice thereof, all as
provided by law and the Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, said hearing
of which notice was given, was opened and held on August 23, 1972, in the
Council Chanbers of City Hall in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, in
accordance with said ordinance and notice, at which time and opportunity
was given to all said above - mentioned persons, firms, corporations and
estates, their agents and attorneys, to be heard and to offer evidence as
to all matters in accordance with said ordinance and notice, at which time
the following appeared and offered the following testimony:
-3-
Mayor Pro Tern Bonniwell announced the scheduled public hearing for improve-
ments on Airport Road, Morgan Avenue, Old Brownsville, South Staples Street and Swantner.
City Manager Townsend explained the purpose of the hearing was to comply with
the statutes regarding paving assessments and explained the procedure to be followed; that
Director of Engineering Services would present the plans and specifications of the project,
pnd that Assistant City Attorney Michael May would conduct the hearing.
Assistant City Attorney May stated that testimony will be heard from the Director
of Engineering Services and evaluation testimony from a real estate appraiser to substantiate
the assessments which appear on the assessment roll, and that this hearing is to form a basis on
which the Council, acting as a legislative body, would determine or establish the assessments
an the abutting properties.
Director of Engineering Services James K. Lantos was interrogated as to his occu-
potion, time of residence in the City, formal qualifications and familiarity with the subject
project. He presented the plans and specifications for the proposed improvements and pointed
out the location; explained that the streets to be improved include (1) Airport Road froma
point 795+ L.F. South of the Morgan Avenue -Old Brownsville Road Intersection to a point
500+ L. F. Mortl; of the Morgan Avenue -Old Brownsville Road Intersection; (2) Morgan
Ava sua from Vera Cruz to the Intersection of Airport Road; (3) Old Brownsville Road from the
Intersection of Airport Road Westward approximately 650 L.F.; (4) South Staples Street, from
18th Street southeast to Annapolis Drive; and (5) Swantner Street, from 18th Street southeast
LF_ �
to Annapolis Drive. He explained that the project is a joint project between the City and the
State under the TOPICS Program and involves construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk,
driveways, and pavement, and also channelization of the streets and widening of the intersection
to improve the traffic flow; that the City basically participates toward the construction of all
concrete work and the State completes the installation of the pavement; and as has been the
policy on past joint projects between the City and State, the City has assessed the concrete
work to the abutting property owners. He explained that Staples and Swantner portion already
has curb and gutter in many places, and it is only required that a sidewalk and driveway
assessment be imposed along the property which does not presently have permanent sidewalk
and driveways, and basically includes the residential lots backing onto Staples Street from
Louisiana towards Annapolis, the west side of Swantner from Ohio to Louisiana, and the What -
a- Burger property in this area; and that in the Old Brownsville Road and Morgan Intersection,
assessments are proposed along the Del Mar Tech property and a portion of Austin Addition
No. 2.
Mr. Lontas stated that the contract had been awarded to Burtex Construction
Company, and that the assessment rates have been determined by using the low bid as sub-
mitted by Burtex and applying the unit prices from the low bid to the front footage of the
abutting properties. He stated the rates for Airport Road; Morgan Street Intersection are
Curb & Gutter, $3.089 LF,; Sidewalk, $5,410 per sq. yard; Driveway, $10.544 per square
yard; that the rate for Baldwin Boulevard, Staples Intersection, Sidewalk, $5.410 per square
yard; Driveway, $10.544 per square yard; and Header Curb, $2.663 per linear foot; that the
total contract price is $463,879.65, total assessments, $15,981.75, and total City and State
share $447,897.90. He explained that the State Highway Department awards contracts on the
basis of square yard which accounts for the difference in the rate figure.
Mr. Wolter E. Nobles, (Item 016 -A), 1018 York, Lot 2, Block 1, Arcadia Sub-
division, appeared and stated he had been assessed for a driveway, and inquired if this
driveway would be torn out; and also stated he is being assessed for a sidewalk at the rear of
ths; property.
Mr. Lantos explained that as is the policy set out in the ordinance, if a piece of
property does not have a sidewalk in front, and the property is less than 250 feet deep, there
is an assessment for sidewalk for lots which back onto the street. He explained that Mr. Nobles'
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
August 23, 1972
Page 18
driveway is asphalt and does not conform; that there a number of asphalt driveways, and they
will be assessed the full cost of concrete.
Mr. Nobles stated his entrance is on South Staples but that the house faces on
York and there are no sidewalks on York. City Manager Townsend stated the Engineering
Staff had tried to work this out. He asked Mr. Nobles if a driveway could be provided or
access to his property off York Street, would he be willing to abandon the driveway coming
off of Staples. Mr. Nobles agreed to this proposal.
Mr, W. A. Roberts, Right of Way Appraiser, stated there had been a question about
granting an easement of access through the park, and In the granting of access they were told
at the time they could not sell any of the park as that was part of the park dedication for park
use only.
tion
Mr, Nobles stated his question had been answered but not entirely to his satisfac-
Mayor Pro Tern Bonniwell asked that Mr. Nobles meet with Mr. Lantos and work
out the problem of his sidewalk and driveway.
Mr. May interrogated Mr. W. A. Roberts, Appraiser for the Right of Way Section
of the City, as to his occupation and qualifications as an appraiser and familiarity with the
subject area and project, and the TOPICS Program. He stated he had personally examined
each parcel of land and checked each with the preliminary assessment roll, and that in his
opinion each and every parcel would be enhanced in value as a result of the improvements at
least to the extent of the assessment.
No one else appeared to be heard in connection with the proposed street improve-
ments.
Motion by Lozano, seconded by Gonzales and passed, that the hearing be closed.
Motion by Lozano, seconded by Gonzales and passed, that an ordinance be brought
r"cu•ard i ,pprcving the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the foregoing street improvements.
THERE BEING NO FURTHER TESTIMONY OFFERED OR ANY FURTHER PARTIES
APPEARING TO BE HEARD, UPON PROPER MOTION, DULY SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY
CARRIED, THE SAID HEARING WAS DECLARED CLOSED; AND
WHEREAS, NO FURTHER PARTIES APPEARING AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY
BEING OFFERED AS TO THE SPECIAL BENEFITS IN RELATION TO THE ENHANCED VALUE
OF SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY AS COMPARED TO COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS OF SAID'
PORTION OF SAID STREETS PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST SAID PROPERTY, OR
AS TO ANY ERRORS, INVALIDITIES OR IRREGULARITIES, IN THE PROCEEDING OR
CONTRACT HERETOFORE HAD IN REFERENCE TO THE PORTIONS OF SAID STREETS TO
BE IMPROVED; AND
WHEREAS, SAID CITY COUNCIL HAS HEARD EVIDENCE AS TO THE SPECIAL
BENEFITS AND ENHANCED VALUE TO ACCRUE TO SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY, AND THE
REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AS COMPARED WITH THE COST OF MAKING
SAID IMPROVEMENTS ON SAID STREETS WITHIN THE LIMITS ABOVE DEFINED, AND HAS
HEARD ALL PARTIES APPEARING AND OFFERING TESTIMONY, TOGETHER WITH ALL PRO-
TESTS AND OBJECTIONS RELATIVE TO SUCH MATTERS AND AS TO ANY ERRORS, INVALIDI-
TIES OR IRREGULARITIES IN ANY OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND CONTRACT FOR SAID IM-
PROVEMENTS, AND HAS GIVEN A FULL AND FAIR HEARING TO ALL PARTIES MAKING OR
DESIRING TO MAKE ANY SUCH PROTEST, OBJECTION OR OFFER TESTIMONY AND HAS
FULLY EXAMINED AND CONSIDERED ALL EVIDENCES MATTERS, OBJECTIONS AND PROTESTS
OFFERED AND BASED UPON SAID EVIDENCE, TESTIMONY AND STATEMENTS, SAID CITY
COUNCIL FINDS THAT EACH AND EVERY PARCEL OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON THE
PORTION OF THE STREETS AFORESAID WITHIN THE LIMITS TO BE IMPROVED AS HEREIN
DEFINED, WILL BE ENHANCED IN VALUE AND SPECIALLY BENEFITED BY THE CONSTRUC-
TION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS UPON THE SAID STREETS UPON WHICH SAID PROPERTY
ABUTS, IN AN AMOUNT IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS
PROPOSED TO BE, AND AS HEREINBELOW ASSESSED AGAINST EACH AND EVERY SAID
PARCEL OF ABUTTING PROPERTY, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND SAID
CITY COUNCIL DID CONSIDER AND CORRECT ALL ERRORS, INVALIDITIES OR DEFICIENCIES
CALLED TO ITS ATTENTION AND DID FIND THAT ALL PROCEEDINGS AND CONTRACTS WERE
PROPER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY AND THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF TEXAS, UNDER WHICH THOSE PROCEEDINGS WERE BEING HAD, AND THE PRO-
CEEDINGS OF SAID CITY COUNCIL HERETOFORE HAD WITH REFERENCE TO SUCH IMPROVE-
MENTS, AND IN ALL RESPECTS TO BE VALID AND REGULAR; AND SAID CITY COUNCIL
-4-
DID FURTHER FIND UPON SAID EVIDENCE THAT THE ASSESSMENTS HEREINBELOW MADE
AND THE CHARGES HEREBY DECLARED AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY ON THE
PORTIONS OF THE STREETS HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED,
AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, ARE JUST AND EQUITABLE AND
DID ADOPT THE RULE OF APPORTIONMENT SET OUT BELOW AND THE DIVISION OF THE
COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN SAID ABUTTING PROPERTIES, AND THE REAL.
AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, AS JUST AND EQUITABLE, AND AS PRODUCING
SUBSTANTIAL EQUALITY CONSIDERING THE BENEFITS TO BE RECEIVED AND THE BURDENS
IMPOSED THEREBY, AND THAT ALL OBJECTIONS AND PROTESTS SHOULD BE OVERRULED
AND DENIED EXCEPT THE CORRECTIONS AND CHANGES AS APPEAR ON THE FINAL ASSESS-
MENT ROLL INCLUDED IN THIS ORDINANCE.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. THAT THERE BEING NO FURTHER PROTEST OR TESTIMONY FOR
OR AGAINST SAID IMPROVEMENTS, SAID HEARING GRANTED TO THE REAL AND TRUE
OWNERS OF ABUTTING PROPERTY ON SAID STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS ABOVE DEFINED,
AND TO ALL PERSONS, FIRMS, CORPORATIONS AND ESTATES, OWNING OR CLAIMING
SAME OR ANY INTEREST THEREIN, BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY CLOSED AND ALL
PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS, WHETHER SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED OR NOT, SHALL BE,
AND THE SAME ARE HEREBY OVERRULED AND DENIED.
SECTION 2. THAT SAID CITY COUNCIL HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES
UPON THE EVIDENCE HEARD IN REFERENCE TO EACH AND EVERY PARCEL OR PROPERTY
ABUTTING UPON THE AFORESAID STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, THAT THE
SPECIAL BENEFITS IN THE ENHANCED VALUE TO ACCRUE TO SAID PROPERTY AND THE
REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, BY VIRTUE OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF
SAID IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID PORTION OF SAID STREETS UPON WHICH SAID PROPERTY
ABUTS, WILL BE IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT OF THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS
AS PROPOSED TO BE, AND AS HEREIN ASSESSED AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTY
AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF, AND FINDS THAT THE APPORTIONMENT OF
THE COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS, AND THAT ALL ASSESSMENTS HEREINSELOW MADE
ARE JUST AND EQUITABLE AND PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL EQUALITY CONSIDERING THE
BENEFITS RECEIVED AND THE BURDENS IMPOSED THEREBY, AND ARE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, AND THE CHARTER PROVISIONS OF THE CITY
OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, AND THAT THE PROCEEDINGS AND CONTRACT HERETOFORE
-5-
HAD WIT11 REFERENCE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ALL RESPECTS REGULARS PROPER
AND VALID AND THAT ALL PREREQUISITES TO THE FIXING OF THE ASSESSMENT LIENS
AGAINST SAID ABUTTING PROPERTIES AS HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED AND THE PERSONAL
LIABILITY OF THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, WHETHER NAMED OR
CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN OR NOT, HAVE BEEN IN ALL THINGS REGULARLY HAD AND
PERFORMED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAWS CHARTER PROVISIONS AND PROCEEDINGS OF
THE SAID CITY COUNCIL.
SECTION 3. THAT IN PURSUANCE OF SAID ORDINANCES, DULY ENACTED
BY SAID CITY COUNCILS AUTHORIZING AND ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS OF THE ABOVE
DESCRIBED STREET, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINEI)p AND IN PURSUANCE OF SAID
PROCEEDINGS HERETOFORE HAD AND ENACTED BY SAID CITY COUNCILS IN REFERENCE
TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND BY VIRTUE OF THE POWERS VESTED IN SAID CITY WITH
RESPECT TO SAID STREET IMPROVEMENTS BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS AND
THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO CHAPTER 106 OF THE
ACTS OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE 140TH LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF
TEXAS KNOWN AND SHOWN AS ARTICLE 11058 OF VERNON'S ANNOTATED CIVIL STATUTES
OF TEXAS AS AMENDED THERE SHALL BED AND IS HEREBY LEVIED, ASSESSED AND
TAXED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID PORTION
OF SAID STREETS AND AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF WHETHER SUCH
REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN OR NOTE
THE SEVERAL SUMS OF MONEY HEREINBELOW MENTIONED AND ITEMIZED OPPOSITE THE
DESCRIPTION OF THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF SAID PROPERTY THE NUMBER OF FRONT
FEET OF EACH AND THE SEVERAL AMOUNTS ASSESSED AGAINST SAME AND THE REAL AND
TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF AND NAMES OF THE APPARENT OWNERS THEREOF ALL
AS CORRECTED AND ADJUSTED BY SAID CITY COUNCILS BEING AS FOLLOWS, TO -WIT:
•
1.
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT :KILL
#T-9007 (2)'
A. Airport Road, from Morgan Avenue 500 feet north
B. Old Brownsville Road, from Morgan Avenue 650 feet west
#T -9007 (3)
A. South Staples Street, from 18th Street southeast to Annapolis
Drive
B. Swantner Street, from 18th Street southeast to Annapolis Drive
The proposed improvements are part of the joint project between the City
and the State referred to as the TOPIC PROGRAM. The Streets will be con-
structed in various widths and excavated in such manner as to provide addi-
tional base where needed. Where no pavement is being constructed, the pave-
ment is being designed to have 6" of lime base, 9" of raliche base and 3" .
of asphaltic concrete. Where the pavement is being overlaid with asphalt,
14" of hot -mix is proposed. The project is designed to provide better
traffic movement by constructing wider lanes and concrete islands. Also to
be constructed are reinforced concrete sidewalks, reinforced concrete curbs,
and concrete driveways including storm sewers where needed.
The assessment rates have been determined by using the low bid as submitted
by Burtex and applying the unit prices from the low bid to the front footage
of the abutting properties. The rates are as follows:
Assessment Rate for Airport Road, Morgan Street Intersection Improvements
Curb and Gutter
Sidewalk
Driveway
$ 3.089 per linear foot
5.410 per square yard
10.544 per square yard
Assessment Rate for Baldwin Boulevard, Staples Street Intersection Improvements
Sidewalk
Driveway
Header Curb
TOTAL OONTRACT PRICE
TOTAL ASSESSMENTS
TOTAL CITY AND STATE SHARE
$ 5.410 per square yard
10.544 per square yard
2.663 per linear foot
$463,879.65
15 981.75
7 8 .g0
/L.,
ames K. Lontos, .E., Director
Engineering Services
7 -19-72
• Page 1•
ITEM
NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
R
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
AIEPORT
ROAD -
4ORGAN STREET
INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
1.
Del Mar College Tech.
1,122 L.F.
C & G
3.089
3,465.86
& Vocational Institute
390.7 S.Y.
Sidewalk
5.410.
2,113.69
Russell Farm Tracts
222.4 S.Y.
Driveway
0.544
2,34+.99
Block 16, 9.2210 acres
7,924.54
2.
L. L. Woodman (F
144.47 L.F.
C & G
3.089
446.27
2214 Laredo (F
64.2 S.Y.
Sidewalk
5.410
347.32
.456 acres, Block D
-0- S.Y.
Driveway
0.544
-0-
Austin Addition #2 (S
132.5 L.F.
C & G
1.544
204.58
(S
58.9 S.Y.
Sidewalk
2.710
159.62
-0- S.Y.
Driveway
0.544
-0-
1,157.79
3.
Francisco A. Vela
40.0 L.F.
C & G
3.089
123.56
658 Airport Road
10.2 S.Y.
Sidewalk
5.410
55.18
Block D, Lot 15
11.7 S.Y.
Driveway
0.544
123.36
Austin Addition #2
302.10
4.
Eufredo G. Flores
40.0 L.F.
C & G
3.089
123.56
654 Airport Road
10.2 S.Y.
Sidewalk
5.410
55.18
Block D, Lot 14
11.7 S.Y.
Driveway
0.544
123.36
_
Austin Addition #2
302.10
5.
Epifanio Hinojosa
40.0 L.F.
C & G
3.089
123 56
650 Airport Road
5.3 S.Y.
Sidewalk
5.410
28.67
Block D, Lot 13
19.1 S.Y.
Driveway
0.544
201.39
Austin Addition #2
353.62
6.
Manuel Gonzales
40.0 L.F.
C & G
3.089
123.56
646 Airport Road
1.6 S.Y.
Sidewalk
5.410
8.66
Block D, Lot 12
4.6 S.Y.
Driveway
0.544
48.50
Austin Addition #2
180.72
• pe,�
ITEM
M.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
i DES&UPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
7.
Roberto G. Ybarra, et ua
30.0 L.F.
C & G
3.089
92.67
642 Airport Road
6.7 S.Y.
Sidewalk
5.410
36.25
Block D, Lot 11
9.5 S.Y.
Driveway
10.544
100.17
Austin Addition #2
229.09
BALD WIN
BOULEVARD
- STAPLES STREI
T
NFERSECTION
]IMPROVEMENTS
8.
R. James Via, Jr.
-0- L.F.
C & G
-0-
-0-
I
1138 Florida (B)
33.3 S.Y.
Sidewalk
3.381
112.59
Lot 10, Block 3 (B)
14.0 S.Y.
Driveway
10.544
147.62
Arcadia Subdivision
260.21
9.
James Ross Underwood
-0- L.F.
C & G
-0-
-0-
1134 Florida (B)
26.7 S.Y.
Sidewalk
3.381
90.27
Lot 9, Block 3 (B)
11.1 S.Y.
Driveway
lo.544
117.04
Arcadia Subdivision
207.31
10.
J. Carl Green
-0- L.F.
C & G
-0-
-0-
1130 Florida (B)
24.9 S.Y.
Sidewalk
3.381
84.19
Lot 8, Block 3 (B)
11.1 S.Y.
Driveway
0.544
117.04
.Arcadia Subdivision
201.23
- ]1.
Hubert R. Miller
-0- L.F.
C & G
-0-
-0-
1424 Fern Drive (B)
30.5 S.Y.
Sidewalk
3.381
103.12
Lot 7, Block 3
-0- S.Y.
Driveway
-0-
-0-
Arcadia Subdivision
103.12
12.
Marjorie McFarland
-0- L.F.
C & G
-0-
-0-
1122 Florida (B)
32.70 S.Y.
Sidewalk
3.381
110.56
Lot 6, Block 3 (B)
-0- S.Y.
Driveway
0.544
-0-
Arcadia Subdivision
110.56
• Page 3•
•
ITEM
NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
a
DESCRIPTION
of
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
13.
William F. Seay
-0- L.F.
C & G
-0-
-0-
1118 Florida (B)
30.5 S.Y.
Sidewalk
3.381
103.12
Lot 5, Block 3
-0- S.Y.
Driveway
-0-
-0-
Arcadia Subdivision
103.12
.14.
J. P. Lancaster
-0- L.F.
C & G
-0-
-0-
Raymond M. Yow, M.D.(B)
18.5 S.Y.
Sidewalk
3.381
62.55
615 Fountain Road (B)
15.0 S.Y.
Driveway
lo.544
158.16
Salisbury, Maryland
220.71
Lot 4, Block 3
Arcadia Subdivision
15.
Phil T. Harris
-0- L.F.
C & G
-0-
-0-
1110 Florida (B)
- 30.5 S.Y.
Sidewalk
3.381
103.12
Lot 3, Block 3
-0- S.Y.
Driveway
-0-
-0-
Arcadia Subdivision
103.12
16. _
Mrs. Annie Lee Cross
-0- L.F.
C & G
-0-
-0-
Post Office Box all (B)
30.5 S.Y.
Sidewalk
3.381
103.12
Taft, Texas
-0- S.Y.
Driveway
-0-
-0-
Lot 2, Block 3
103.12
Arcadia Subdivision
16-A.
Walter E. N- o-bies
-0-
C & G
-0-
-
1018 York
16.0 S.Y.
Driveway
10.544
168.70
Lot 2, Block 1
20.8 S.Y.
Sidewalk
3.381
70.32
Arcadia Subdivision
239.02
Ed
T SIDE OF E
2APLES STREET
17.
Whataburger, Inc.
-0- L.F.
C & G
-0-
-0-
Post Office Box 6742
60.0 S.Y.
Sidewalk
324.60
Lot 1
201.2 S.Y.
Driveway
0.544
2,121.45
Zweig Tract
[1,410
2,446.05
ITEM
NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
; DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
WEST SIDE SWANTNER BOILEVARD
( FRCM
OHIO AVENUE UD
LOUISIANA
AVENUE
)
18.
Dorothy Osbman
-0- L.Y.
C & G
-0-
-0-
621 Grant
46.7 S.Y.
Sidewalk
5.410
252.65
Lot 2A, Block 1
-0- S.Y.
Driveway
10.544
-0-
Lindale Park,, Sec. 1
252.65
19.
Coastal Bend Properties
-0- L.F.
C & G
-0-
-0-
M.A. Cage
32.3 S.Y.
Sidewalk
5.410
174.74
1020 The 600 Building
72.0 S.Y.
Driveway
10.544
759.17
N 132' Lot 2, Block 1
93.0 L.F.
Header Curb
2.663
247.66
Lindale Park, Sec. 1
1,181.57
TOTAL ASSESS DENTS
15,98d•76"
SECTION 4. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED THAT IN THE EVENT THE ACTUAL
FRONTAGE OF ANY PROPERTY HEREIN ASSESSED SHALL BE FOUND UPON THE COMPLETION
OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS TO BE GREATER OR LESS THAN THE NUMBER OF FEET HEREIN -
ABOVE STATED, THE ASSESSMENTS HEREIN SET AGAINST ANY SUCH PROPERTY AND
AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREC', SHALL BE, AND THE SAME
ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE INCREASED OR DECREASED AS THE CASE MAY BE, IN
THE PROPORTION WHICH SAID EXCESS OR DEFICIENCY OR FRONTAGE SHALL BEAR TO
THE WHOLE NUMBER OF FRONT FEET OF PROPERTY ACTUALLY IMPROVED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE FRONT FOOT RULE OR RATE OF ASSESSMENT HEREIN ADOPTED, IT BEING THE
INTENTION THAT SUCH PARCEL OF PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS
THEREOF ABUTTING ON THE PORTION OF THE STREETS ABOVE DESCRIBED, WITHIN THE
LIMITS DEFINED, SHALL PAY FOR SAID IMPROVEMENTS UNDER THE "FRONT FOOT RULE
OR PLAN ", WHICH RULE OR PLAN IS HEREBY FOUND AND DETERMINED TO BE JUST AND
EQUITABLE AND TO PRODUCE A SUBSTANTIAL EQUALITY, HAVING IN VIEW THE SPECIAL
BENEFITS TO BE RECEIVED AND THE BURDENS IMPOSED THEREBY; AND IT I'S FURTHER
ORDAINED THAT UPON FINAL COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS ON
THE AFORESAID STREETS, WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED ALL CERTIFICATES HEREIN-
AFTER PROVIDED FOR, ISSUED TO EVIDENCE SAID ASSESSMENTS AGAINST SAID PARCELS
OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREET, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS
THEREOF, SHALL BE ISSUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH,- AND SHALL.EVIDENCE THE ACTUAL
FRONTAGE OF SAID PROPERTY AND THE ACTUAL COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS, THE
AMOUNT NAMED IN SAID CERTIFICATE IN NO CASE TO EXCEED THE AMOUNT HEREIN
ASSESSED AGAINST SUCH PROPERTY UNLESS SUCH INCREASE BE CAUSED BY AN EXCESS
OF FRONT FOOTAGE OVER THE AMOUNT HEREINABOVE STATED, SUCH ACTUAL COST AND
SUCH ACTUAL NUMBER OF FRONT FEET, IF DIFFERENT FROM THE HEREINABOVE SHOWN
IN SECTION 3 HEREOF, TO BE DETERMINED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS UPON
COMPLETION OF SAID WORK ON SAID STREET, AND THE FINDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR OF
PUBLIC WORKS SHALL BE FINAL AND BINDING UPON ALL PARTIES CONCERNED.
SECTION 5. THAT THE SEVERAL SUMS MENTIONED ABOVE IN SECTION 3
HEREOF ASSESSED AGAINST SAID PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING ON THE AFORESAID
STREETS,- WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED, AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNERS THEREOF,
WHETHER NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN OR NOT, SUBJECT TO TILE PROVISIONS
OF SECTION 4 THEREOF, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST THEREON AT THE RATE OF SIX
-7-
AND ONE -HALF (6 -11eu) PER ANNUM WITH REASONABLE ATTORNEYS FEE AND ALL
COSTS AND EXPENSES OF COLLECTIONS IF INCURRED, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE
MADE A FIRST AND PRIOR LIEN UPON THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY
AGAINST WHICH SAME ARE ASSESSED FROM AND AFTER THE DATE SAID IMPROVEMENTS
WERE ORDERED BY SAID CITY COUNCILS TO -WIT: July 26, 1972 , AND A
PERSONAL LIABILITY AND CHARGE AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS BE
NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED HEREIN AND THAT SAID LIEN SHALL BE AND CONSTITUTE
THE FIRST AND PRIOR ENFORCEABLE CLAIM AGAINST THE PROPERTY ASSESSED AND
SHALL BE A FIRST AND PARAMOUNT LIEN SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER LIENSS CLAIMS OR
TITLES EXCEPT FOR LAWFUL AD VALOREM TAXES; AND THAT THE SAME SO ASSESSED
SHALL BE PAID AND BECOME PAYABLE IN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS AT THE
OPTION OF THE PROPERTY OWNER:
1. ALL IN CASH WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OR
ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY; OR
2. TWENTY PERCENT (20%) CASH WITHIN TWENTY DAYS
AFTER THE COMPLETION OF SAID WORK AND ITS ACCEPTANCE
BY THE CITY, AND 20p RESPECTIVELY ON OR BEFORE ONE
YEARS TWO YEARS, THREE YEARS AND FOUR YEARS AFTER
THE COMPLETION OF SAID WORK AND ITS ACCEPTANCE BY
THE CITY, WITH INTEREST FROM DAY OF SUCH COMPLETION
AND ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY UNTIL PAID AT THE RATE OF
6 -1j2, PER ANNUM; OR
3. PAYMENTS TO BE MADE IN MAXIMUM OF 60 EQUAL INSTALL-
MENTS, THE FIRST OF WHICH SHALL BE PAID WITHIN 20
DAYS AFTER THE COMPLETION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND
THE ACCEPTANCE THEREOF BY THE CITY AND THE BALANCE
TO BE PAID IN 59 EQUAL CONSECUTIVE MONTHLY INSTALL-
MENTS COMMENCING ON THE 1ST DAY OF THE NEXT SUCCEED-
ING MONTH AND CONTINUING THEREAFTER ON THE 1ST DAY
OF EACH SUCCEEDING MONTH-UNTIL THE ENTIRE SUM IS
PAID IN FULLS TOGETHER WITH INTEREST FROM THE DATE
OF SAID COMPLETIONI AND ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY UNTIL
PAID, AT THE RATE OF SIX AND ONE -HALF PERCENT (6- 12,'0)
-8-
PER ANNUM; PROVIDEDj HOWEVERj THAT THE OWNERS
OF SAID PROPERTY AVAILING THEMSELVES OF OPTION
°Z1, OR 'T' ABOVE SHALL HAVE THE PRIVILEGE OF
PLAYING ONES OR ALLY OF SUCH INSTALLMENTS AT ANY
TIME BEFORE MATURITY THEREOF BY PAYING THE
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PRINCIPAL DUEj TOGETHER WITH
INTEREST ACCRUED TO THE DATE OF PAYMENT.
SECTION 6. THAT FOR THE PURPOSE OF EVIDENCING SAID ASSESSMENTS,
THE LIENS SECURING SAME AND THE SEVERAL SUMS ASSESSED AGAINST THE SAID
PARCELS OF PROPERTY AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF AND THE
TIME AND TERMS OF PAYMENTS AND TO AID IN THE ENFORCEMENT THEREOF ASSIGN-
ABLE CERTIFICATES SHALL BE ISSUED BY THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS TO
ITSELF UPON THE COMPLETION OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS IN SAID STREETS AND ACCEPTANCE
THEREOF BY SAID CITY COUNCILS WHICH CERTIFICATES SHALL BE EXECUTED BY THE
MAYOR IN THE NAME OF THE CITY ATTESTED BY THE CITY SECRETARY, WITH THE
CORPORATE SEAL OF SAID CITY AND WHICH CERTIFICATES SHALL DECLARE THE AMOUNTS
OF SAID ASSESSMENTS AND THE TIMES AND TERMS THEREOF, THE RATE OF INTEREST
THEREON THE DATE OF THE COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR
WHICH THE CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AND SHALL CONTAIN THE NAMES OF THE APPARENT
TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE AND THE.DESCRIPTION OF THE
PROPERTY ASSESSED BY LOT AND BLOCK NUMBER, OR FRONT FOOT THEREOF OR SUCH
OTHER DESCRIPTION AS MAY OTHERWISE IDENTIFY THE SAME AND IF THE SAID PRO-
PERTY SHALL BE OWNED BY AN ESTATE OR FIRM, THEN TO SO STATE THE FACT SHALL
BE SUFFICIENT AND NO ERROR OR MISTAKE IN DESCRIBING SUCH PROPERTY OR IN
GIVING THE NAME OF ANY OWNER OR OWNERSO OR OTHERWISE SHALL IN ANYWISE
INVALIDATE OR IMPAIR THE ASSESSMENT LEVIED HEREBY OR THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED
IN EVIDENCE THEREOF.
THAT SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL FURTHER PROVIDE SUBSTANTIALLY THAT
IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT OF ANY INSTALLMENT OF PRINCIPAL OR
INTEREST WHEN DUE, THEN AT THE OPTION ,OF THE CITY ITS SUCCESSORS, OR ASSIGNS
OR THE HOLDER THEREOF THE WHOLE OF SAID ASSESSMENT EVIDENCED THEREBY SHALL
AT ONCE BECOME DUE AND PAYABLE AND SHALL BE COLLECTIBLE WITH REASONABLE
ATTORNEYS FEES AND ALL EXPENSES AND COSTS OF COLLECTIONS IF INCURRED AND
SAID CERTIFICATE SHALL SET FORTH AND EVIDENCE THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE
REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS OF SUCH PROPERTY, WHETHER NAMED OR CORRECTLY
NAMED THEREIN OR NOT, AND THE LIEN UPON SUCH PROPERTY, AND THAT SAID LIEN
IS FIRST AND PARAMOUNT THEREON, SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER LIENS, TITLES AND
CHARGES, EXCEPT FOR LAWFUL AD VALOREM TAXES, FROM AND AFTER THE DATE SAID
IMPROVEMENTS WERE ORDERED BY SAID CITY COUNCIL, TO -WIT: .filly 26, 1972
AND SHALL PROVIDE IN EFFECT THAT IF DEFAULT SHALL BE MADE IN THE PAYMENT
THEREOF, THE SAME MAY BE ENFORCED, AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY, OR THEIR
SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, BY THE SALE OF THE PROPERTY THEREIN DESCRIBED IN
THE MANNER PROVIDED FOR THE COLLECTION OF AD VALOREM TAXES AS ABOVE RECITED,
OR BY SUIT IN ANY COURT HAVING JURISDICTION.
THAT SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL FURTHER RECITE IN EFFECT THAT ALL
THE PROCEEDINGS WITH REFERENCE TO MAKING SAID IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN REGULARLY
HAD IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW AND CHARTER IN FORCE IN SAID CITY AND
THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY, AND THAT ALL PREREQUISITES
TO THE FIXING OF THE ASSESSMENT LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY THEREIN DESCRIBED,
OR ATTEMPTED TO BE DESCRIBED, AND THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF THE REAL AND
TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS THEREOF, EVIDENCED BY SUCH CERTIFICATES, HAVE BEEN
REGULARLY DONE AND PERFORMED, WHICH RECITALS SHALL BE EVIDENCE OF ALL THE
MATTERS AND FACTS SO RECITED AND NO FURTHER PROOF THEREOF SHALL BE REQUIRED
IN ANY COURT.
THAT SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL FURTHER PROVIDE IN EFFECT THAT THE
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, SHALL EXERCISE ALL OF ITS LAWFUL POWERS, IN
THE ENFORCEMENT AND COLLECTION THEREOF, AND SAID CERTIFICATES MAY CONTAIN
OTHER AND FURTHER RECITALS, PERTINENT AND APPROPRIATE THERETO. IT SHALL
NOT BE NECESSARY THAT SAID CERTIFICATES SHALL BE IN THE EXACT FORM AS ABOVE
SET FORTH, BUT THE SUBSTANCE AND EFFECT THEREOF SHALL SUFFICE.
SECTION 7. THAT ALL SUCH ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ARE A PERSONAL
LIABILITY AND CHARGE AGAINST THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER OR OWNERS OF THE PRO-
PERTY DESCRIBED OR ATTEMPTED TO BE DESCRIBED NOTWITHSTANDING SUCH OWNER
1 7
OR OWNERS MAY NOT BE NAMED OR CORRECTLY NAMED, AND ANY IRREGULARITY IN THE
NAME OF THE PROPERTY OWNER, OR THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY PROPERTY OR THE AMOUNT
OF ANY ASSESSMENT, OR IN ANY OTHER MATTER OR THING SHALL NOT IN ANYWISE
INVALIDATE OR IMPAIR ANY ASSESSMENT LEVIED HEREBY OR ANY CERTIFICATE ISSUED,
AND SUCH MISTAKE, OR ERROR, INVALIDITY OR IRREGULARITY WHETHER IN SUCH
6ID
�1_
•
ASSESSMENT OR IN THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED IN EVIDENCE THEREOF MAY BED BUT IS
NOT REQUIRED TO BED TO BE ENFORCEABLE AT ANY TIME CORRECTED,BY THE SAID
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI. FURTHER THAT THE OMISSION OF
SAID IMPROVEMENTS IN FRONT OF ANY PART OR PARCEL OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON
THE AFOREMENTIONED STREETS WHICH IS EXEMPT FROM THE LIEN OF SAID ASSESS-
" MENTj SHALL IN NO WISE AFFECT OR IMPAIR THE VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENTS AGAINST
THE OTHER PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON SAID STREET; AND THAT THE TOTAL
AMOUNTS ASSESSED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING UPON
SAID STREETS WITHIN THE LIMITS HEREIN DEFINED AND THE REAL AND TRUE OWNER
OR OWNERS THEREOF ARE THE SAME ASS OR LESS THANE THE ESTIMATE OF SAID
ASSESSMENT PREPARED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED
BY SAID CITY COUNCIL AND ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEEDINGS OF SAID CITY
COUNCIL RELATIVE TO SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS THEREOFj AND WITH THE
TERMS POWERS AND PROVISIONS OF SAID CHAPTER 106 OF THE ACTS OF THE FIRST -
CALLED SESSION OF THE 40TH LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, KNOWN AS
ARTICLE 1105B OF VERNON'S ANNOTATED CIVIL STATUTES OF TEXAS AND THE CHARTER
OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI] TEXAS UNDER WHICH TERMS POWERS AND PROVISIONS
SAID PROCEEDINGS SAID IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS WERE HAD AND MADE BY
SAID CITY COUNCIL.
SECTION 8. THE FACT THAT THE ABOVE- DESCRIBED STREETS HAVE BECOME
IMPORTANT THOROUGHFARES AND THE FACT THAT THE PRESENT CONDITION OF SAID
STREETS2 WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED ARE DANGEROUS TO THE HEALTH AND PUBLIC
WELFARE OF THE INHABITANTS THEREOF CREATES A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND AN
IMPERATIVE PUBLIC NECESSITY, REQUIRING THE SUSPENSION OF THE CHARTER RULE
THAT NO ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE OF ITS
INTRODUCTIONS AND THAT SAID ORDINANCE SHALL BE READ AT THREE SEVERAL MEETINGS
OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THE MAYOR HAVING DECLARED THAT SUCH EMERGENCY AND
NECESSITY EXISTS AND HAVING REQUESTED THAT SAID CHARTER RULE BE SUSPENDED
AND THAT THIS ORDINANCE BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE OF ITS INTRODUCTION
AND TAKE EFFECT AND BE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT FROM AND AFT ITS PASSAGE,
IT IS ACCORDINGLY SO ORDAINED, THIS THE DAY OF 7,Z
ATTEST: A
CIT SE RE AR MAYOR
THE CITY OF ORPU RISTI, TEXAS
APPROVED:
DAY f ' '197;:
CI ATTORNEY
.,-4,:r.
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
DAY OF
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE EMERGENCY .CLAUSE OF THE FOREGOING
ORDINANCE, A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND IMPERATIVE NECESSITY EXIST FOR THE SUSPEN-
51ON OF THE CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT THAT NO ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL
BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED, AND THAT SUCH ORDINANCE OR
RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL; I, THEREFORE,
REQUEST THAT YOU SUSPEND SAID CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT AND.PASS THIS ORDI-
NANCE FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED, OR AT THE PRESENT MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL.
RES LY,
YOR
THE CITY OF C0 RIST1,, TEXAS
THE CHARTER RULE WAS SUSPENDED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTEL
RONNIE SIZEMORE
CHARLES A. BONNIWELL
ROBERTO BosQUEZ, M.D.
REV. HAROLD T. BRANCH
THOMAS V. GONZALES
GABE LOZANO, SR.
J. HOWARD STARK
THE ABOVE ORDINANCE WAS PASSED BY THE FOLLOWIN VOTE:
RONNIE SIZEMORE
CHARLES A. BONNIWELL
ROBERTO BOSQUEZ, M.D. _
'REV. HAROLD T. BRANCH
THOMAS V. GONZALES '
GABS LOZANO, SR.
J. HOWARD STARK