HomeMy WebLinkAbout11563 ORD - 07/05/1973t '
JRIR:VB:7- 5 -73,= '
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI ADOPTED ON THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1937,
APPEARING OF RECORD IN VOLUME 9, PAGES 565, ET SEQ,
OF THE ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION RECORDS, AS AMENDED
FROM TIME TO TIME AND PARTICULARLY AS AMENDED BY
ORDINANCE NO. 6106, AS AMENDED, UPON APPLICATION OF
BERNARD JEROME SEAL BY
AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONING ON
LOT 1, BLOCK 6, ALAMEDA PARK ,
SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, NUECES
+ COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM "R -2" TWO- FAMILY DWELLING
DISTRICT TO AB PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
DISTRICT ; KEEPING IN EFFECT ALL OTHER
PROVISIONS,OF THE EXISTING ORDINANCE AS AMENDED;
REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH;
AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS FORWARDED TO THE CITY
COUNCIL ITS REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF
Bernard Jerome Seal FOR AMENDMENT
TO THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI; AND
WHEREAS, PUBLIC HEARING WAS HELD AT WHICH HEARING ALL PERSONS
WISHING TO APPEAR AND BE HEARD WERE HEARD, TO CONSIDER THE SAME BEFORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROPER
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC, SAID PUBLIC HEARING HAVING BEEN HELD ON July 5,
1973 , AT Special COUNCIL MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER AT CITY HALL IN THE CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI; AND
WHEREAS, BY MOTION DULY MADE, SECONDED AND CARRIED, IT WAS
DECIDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THAT TO APPROVE THE HEREINAFTER SET FORTH
y, AMENDMENT WOULD BEST SERVE PUBLIC HEALTH, NECESSITY AND CONVENIENCE AND
THE GENERAL WELFARE OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS-CITIZENS:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. THAT THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI, TEXAS, PASSED ON THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 19371 APPEARING OF
+RECORD IN VOLUME 9, PAGES 565, ET SEQ, OF THE ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION
RECORDS, AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME, AND IN PARTICULAR AS AMENDED BY
ORDINANCE No. 6106, AS AMENDED, BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY AMENDED BY
MAKING THE CHANGE HEREINAFTER.SET OUT.,,
t }
II
SECTION 2. THAT THE ZONING on Lot 1, Block 6, Alameda Park, located
on the southeast corner of Everhart Road and Avalon Streets "in the City of`Corpus
Christi, Nueces County, Texas, be changed from "R -2" Two - family Dwelling District
to "AB" Professional Office District.
SECTION 3. THAT THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI, TEXAS, BE,
1 AND THE SAME IS HEREBY, AMENDED AS HEREIN ORDAINED.
4
SECTION . THAT THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, APPROVED ON THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1937, AS
AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME, EXCEPT AS HEREIN CHANGED, SHALL REMAIN IN
FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.
SECTION 5. THAT ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CON-
FLICT HEREWITH ARE HEREBY EXPRESSLY REPEALED.
SECTION 6. THAT THE NECESSITY OF IMMEDIATELY MAKING AFORESAID
CHANGE FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAINTAINING AT ALL--TIMES A COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CREATES A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND
AN IMPERATIVE PUBLIC NECESSITY REQUIRING THE SUSPENSION OF THE CHARTER
RULE THAT NO ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE
OF ITS INTRODUCTION AND THAT SUCH ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ
AT THREE SEVERAL MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THE MAYOR HAVING
DECLARED THAT SUCH EMERGENCY AND NECESSITY EXIST, AND HAVING REQUESTED
THE SUSPENSION OF THE CHARTER RULE AND THAT THIS ORDINANCE BE PASSED
FINALLY ON THE DATE OF ITS INTRODUCTION AND TAKE EFFECT AND BE IN FULL
FORCE AND EFFECT FROM AND AFTER ITS PASSAGE, IT IS ACCORDINGLY SO
ORDAINED, THIS THE S�k� DAY OF July, 1973
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
MAY
APPROVED: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
DAY OF JULY, 1973
Corpus Christi, Texas
urn day of 19 7—i
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Corpus Christi, Texas
For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing
ordinance, a public emergency and imperative necessity exist for the suspen-
sion of the Charter rule or requirement that no ordinance or resolution shall
be passed finally on the date it is introduced, and that such ordinance or
resolution shall be read at three meetings of the City Council; I, therefore,
request that you suspend said Charter rule or requirement and pass this ordi-
nance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the
City Council,
Respectfully,
MAYO
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
The Charter rule was suspended by the following vote:
Jason Luby
James T. Acuff
Rev. Harold T. Branch
Thomas V. Gonzales
Ricardo Gonzalez
Gabe Lozano, Sr.
J. Howard Stark
The above ordinance was passed by the following vote:
Jason Luby
James T. Acuff
Rev. Harold T. Branch
Thomas V. Gonzales
Ricardo Gonzalez
Gabe Lozano, Sr. p yR
J. Howard Stark
'r
a
1
�1 a OFFICE
of the
CITY ATTORNEY _V ` x
r- - - --- - : - - - -
,July 5, 1973'
LEGAL OBJECTION �•
.n • a 1.0 ,
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CORPUS
CHRISTI ADOPTED ON THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1937,
�,• APPEARING OF RECORD IN VOLUME 9, PAGES 565, ET §EQ.',
OF THE ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION RECORDS, AS AMENDED
FROM TIME TO TIME AND PARTICULARLY AS AMENDED BY
ORDINANCE NO. 6106, AS AMENDED, UPON APPLICATION OF
BERNARD JEROME SEAL BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY
CHANGING THE ZONING ON LOT 1, BLOCK 6, ALAMEDA PARK,
SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CORPUS-CHRISTI, NUECES Y s
' W COUNTY, TEXAS,,,FROM "R -2" TWO- FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT
TO "AB" PROFESSIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT; KEEPING IN EFFECT
ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE EXISTING ORDINANCE AS a
AMENDED; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; -
*. AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. }
For the'lreasons hereinafter stated, legal objection is hereby filed,
throur g the City Secretary, with the City Council to the captioned ordinance,
pursuant to'City Charter, Article IV, Section 25(a), and prior to action upon
said ordinance by the City Council: a
The rezoning to be effected, recommended by less than a majority.of
the entire Planning Commission, by the captioned ordinance constitutes "spot 4
zoning ", or irrelevant zoning, by the rules of law in the State of Texas.
Rezoning's to be made on material change of condition.
It, is my opinion that there is not a sufficient change of condition
relative to the subject property to warrant rezoning. The proposed change in
zoning is not an extension of adjacent or neighboring "AB" zoning. The subject
lot is a portion of a residential subdivision that is 98% developed with single
family homes. The "R -2" zoning of the subject and its neighboring lots fronting
on Avalon Street serves as a buffer, a transitional use between the low density
"R -1B" uses and the more intense "B -1" and "B -4" business uses. The uses
permitted (i.e., non - residential and commercial) under the requested change are
f, also inconsistent with immediately adjacent duplex or townhouse uses ( "R -2 ") and 3
single- family occupancies that are now established. The closest, latest change
r
of zoning to occur within this "R -2" District (established in 1970).is the re-
zoning to special permit of two lots 420 feet to the rear of the subject prop-
erty, which is separated from the applicant's block by Sam Street, a residential
drive. The City Traffic Engineer advised that the proposed zoning is intrusive
and would generate increased traffic on the bounding streets, one of which,
Avalon, is residential.
The character and quality of the surrounding uses and structures
has not changed to the extent to amount to a change of conditions which would
warrant a change in zoning. The applicant offered no evidence regarding Traffic.
By the Applicant's admission this rezoning is sought purely for his convenience
in relocating an office that is already sited in a very substantial building in
the B -1 District across Avalon Street. There is no evidence in the record that
the public health, safety, morals, or welfare will be appreciably served by
the change; on the contrary, there is evidence that the public interest will
suffer. The Applicant, it is submitted, has not met his burden of proof.
To grant the'request in absence of such a change in conditions
referred to above would, in my opinion, constitute illegal spot zoning.
Respectfully su mitted,
James R. Rig ;"
City Attorney
cc: R. Marvin Townsend, City Manager
,William Anderson, Planning Director
Charles Cartwright, Chairman of the Planning Commission