HomeMy WebLinkAbout12528 ORD - 03/12/1975M:VMR:3- 11- 75;1s`r
AN ORDINANCE
AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE
CRIMINAL JUSTICE COUNCIL FOR SECOND YEAR FUNDING OF
THE CRIME PREVENTION UNIT, AND TO AUTHORIZE EXECUTION
OF ALL DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO CONTINUE THE PROGRAM,
IF AND WHEN THE GRANT IS APPROVED; AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,
TEXAS:
SECTION 1. THAT AUTHORIZATION IS HEREBY GIVEN FOR SUBMISSION OF A
GRANT APPLICATION TO THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE COUNCIL FOR SECOND YEAR FUNDING OF
THE CRIME PREVENTION UNIT, AND AUTHORIZATION IS HEREBY GIVEN THE CITY MANAGER
TO EXECUTE ALL DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO CONTINUE THE PROGRAM, IF AND WHEN THE
GRANT IS APPROVED, A COPY OF SAID GRANT APPLICATION, SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM
ATTACHED HERETO, IS MARKED EXHIBIT "A", AND MADE A PART HEREOF.
SECTION Z. THE NECESSITY TO IMMEDIATELY AUTHORIZE SUBMISSION OF THE
AFORESAID GRANT APPLICATION AND TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS, IF AND WHEN
THE GRANT IS APPROVED, IN ORDER THAT THE PROGRAM MAY CONTINUE WITHOUT INTERRUP-
TION CREATES A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND AN IMPERATIVE PUBLIC NECESSITY REQUIRING
THE SUSPENSION OF THE CHARTER RULE THAT NO ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE
PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE OF ITS INTRODUCTION BUT THAT SUCH ORDINANCE OR
RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE SEVERAL MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND
THE MAYOR HAVING DECLARED SUCH EMERGENCY AND NECESSITY TO EXIST, AND HAVING
REQUESTED THE SUSPENSION OF THE CHARTER RULE AND THAT THIS ORDINANCE TAKE EFFECT
AND BE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT FROM AND AFTER ITS PASSAGE, IT IS ACCORDINGLY
SO ORDAINED, THIS THE /� DAY OF MARCH, 1975•
ATTEST:
CkfY- SECRETARY -� MAYOR
E CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEX
APP VED:
DAY OF MARCH, 1975•
fktl�kd f TVA"
ACITtOU CITY ATTORNEY
12528
OMB No, 80 -RO189
66. REMARKS
IC
1 APPLICATION DATE
C EET for FEDERAL f�RANT�APPLICATION/AWARO NOTIFICATION
19 75
2 FEDERAL ID NO.
ITEL15 1 MPLETED BY APPLICANT OR CLEARINGHOUSE DE-PENDING UPON STATE PROCEDURES
3. APPLICANT - Organizational Unit 4. ADDRESS - Street .11. 0. Box
Corpus Christi Police Department
5. CITY 6.
COUNTY 7.
STATE
8. 21P CODE
9. PROG NO. (Catalog of Fad Domestic Assistance)
j Corpus Christi
Nueces axes
78408
10. TY E OF ACTION
TYPE OF CHANGE (Complete if tOb or 10c was checked)
13.
14. EXISTING FED GRAM ID
:a ❑New e ❑ Modification
1a ❑ increased Dollars 1a ® Increased Duration o ®Other Scope Charq
AC -3 -BI -1941
�b�COnt(nuation
b Decreased Dollars b ❑ Decreased Duration b ❑Cancellation
r yr mo
19. APPLICANT TYPE
FUNDS REOUESTED[Far Changes Shaw Only AmL O /1 -1()or DeeNd
15. RrS UESTED FUND START 197s 5
Enter Letter
A. State F. School District
E 20. FEDERAL ( J$ 58.207 00
16. FUNDS DURATION _(Months)
B. Interstate G. Community Action Agency
21 STATE ( 1 $ •00
yr
C. Sub State Dist H. Sponsored or
22. LOCAL / )$37,454 .00
17. EST. PROJECT START 19 75 1
D. County I. Indian
23. OTHER ( )$ .00
1s. ES!, DURATION 11 Months)
E. City J. Other (Specify to Remarks)
24. TOTAL (20,21,22,231 I )$95,661 .00
25. BR)EF TITLE OF
APPLICANT'S PROJECT Corpus Christi Police Department Crime Prevention Unit
26. DEISCRIPTION OF APPLICANT'S PROJECT (Purpose)
To provide a program which will enable the Police Department to increase public awareness
of the problems associated with criminal acts and to provide expertise and guidance to all
segments of the community in the prevention of criminality.
27. AREA OF PROJECT IMPACT (Indicate City, County, State, otc.)
City of Corpus Christi, Nueces, Texas
28. COPGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 29.
Environmental Assessment Required
30. CLEARINGHOUSE(S) TO WHICH SUBMITTED
O( Applicant Districts Impacted By Project
By State/Federal Agency? El Yes
C 14 ] [ I
®NO
a ❑ State b ®Area Wide c ❑ None
31. s NAME OF CONTACT PERSON
b ADDRESS - Street or P.O. Box
c TELEPHONE NO.
W. C. Banner
P. 0. Box 9016
884 -3811
ITEMS 32 -38 TO BE COMPLETED BY CLEARINGHOUSE
MULTIPLE
32. CLEARINGHOUSE ID
❑CLEARING HOUSE
33. a ACTION BASED ON
REVIEW OF
b ACTION TAKEN
STATE APPLICATION
133,
+. 0 Notification a
❑With Comment a ❑Waived
34' IDENTIFIER (sAI)
b)�A li,ation b
❑ Without Comment d ❑ Unfsvorsbla
State
Number
S
City
County/ Ciry
County/ Crty
County / Qty
County/ City
County/ City
35.CLFARINGHOUSE
Ping Area
Ping Area
Ping Area
Ping Area
Ping Area
ing Area
IPPACTCODE
Yez ❑
36. STATE PLAN REQUIRED
37. RECEIVING DATE yr mo day 38.
FINAL CLEARINGHOUSE ACTION DATE
AT CLEARINGHOUSE
t9
yr mo tlay
❑Vas ❑NO
-_-
t9____
ITEMS 39 -42 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT BEFORE SENDING FORM TO FEDERAL AGENCY
The applicant certifies that to the best of his knowledge and belief the above date are true and Check box if no clearinghouse
39. CE FITI FICATION -
correct and filing of this form has been duly authorized by the governing body of the applicant. response was received in 30 days
40. a NAME (Print or Type) --
TITLE
,SIGNATURE of Authorized Representative
d TELEPHONE NUMBER
: R. Marvin Townsend
,TE
City Manager
-
884 -3011
41. D MAILED TO FEDERALISTATE AGENCY yr rno day
42. NAME OF FEDERAL J STATE AGENCY
1975 C - �-
TO WHICH THIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED
ITEMS 43 -54 TO BE COMPLETED BY FEDERAL OFFICE EVALUATING AND RECOMMENDING ACTION ON THE APPLICATION
43. GRANT APPLICATION ID
52. Application Rec d.
53.a Exp. Action Data
r• a`f<.t'✓ .,K.hF1;=4
I -,a1',
53.b Ret. to Applicant
:(Assigned by Federal Agency)
yr mo day
yr mo day
•; Alwa1[ ys•plem6
yr mo day
19-
t9
19 -
44. G AGENCY
R
Amended Appltc.
R
Rev. Expected
54, Exp. Action
R
Subsequent Rat. to
E
V
Received
E
V
Action Date
Revised
E
V
Applicant
45.014GANIZATIONAL UNIT
I me day
I
yr mo day
yr mo day
S
yr me day
$
s
0
19
19 -_ -_ -_
i 19
0 19
- -_ -_
19
19___
)
0
19___
19___
46. Ar MINISTERING OFFICE
S
S 19
-.__
19_ -_
S
19 -_ --
47. ADDRESS - Street or P.O. Box
'
48, CITY
9. STATE 50.
ZIP CODE 51,
TELEPHONE NUMBER
ITEMS 55 -65 TO BE COMPLETED
BY THE FEDERAL OFFICE APPROVING
THE GRANT
APPLICATION
FINAL ACTION FINAL DATES yr mo day
FUNOSAPPROVED [For Changes Show OnlyAmtoflne. (tJ or Dec. (•J-[
55, a )❑ Awarded b ❑ Rejected O ❑ Withdrawn Is- - -
60. FEDERAL AMOUNT IF Yfunds) ( ) $ ,00
56. FONDS AVAILABLE 19
STATE SHARE ( ) $ .00
57. ESJDING DATE 19 - - -
62. LOCAL SHARE ( 1$ ,00
63. OTHER ( J$ .00
58. F DER AL GRANT ID
64. TOTAL (60, 61, 62, 63) / 1$ .00
59. FFr DERAL FUND ACCOUNT NUMBER
65, MULTIPLE PROGRAM -LINK
66. REMARKS
N N
Office of the Governor
XZV
APPLICATION FOR GRANT
1. Applicant Agency or Institution:
City of Corpus Christi, Texas
302 S. Shoreline
P. 0. Box 9277
Corpus Christi, Texas 78408
Page 1
Criminal Justice Division.
2. Program No. Under Which Funding Expected:
75 — Al
3. Type of Application: (Check one)
Original Revision Continuation X
If continued or revised give number of all grants
AC- 73 —BO1 -1941
4. Short Title of Project: (Do not exceed one typed line)
Corpus Christi Police Department Crime Prevention Unit
5. Project Director:
6. Financial Officer:
(Name, title, address, telephone) I
. (Name, title, address, telephone)
W. C. Banner Commander
P. 0. Box 0f6
Corpus Ch 'sti, T
Harold Zick, Director of Finance
302 S. Shoreline
x s 78408
512 -884— 1
Corpus 4 -3
P. 0. NLR7VV
Signature e.
Sinatur
7. Period of Present R equest:
8. Project Duration:
From May 1, 1975
From September 28, 1973
Through April 30, 1976
Through April 30, 1976
302 S. Shoreline
Total lengtb 31 months
Request for Present Year or Period:
Total CJD Support Sought:
Corpus Christi, Texas 78408
(Total for project, federal and state)
58,207
148,445
9. Official Authorized to Sign Application:
10. Federal Support:
(Name, title, address, telephone)
R. Marvin Townsend, City Manager
Will other federal support be available for any part of this
302 S. Shoreline
project?
P. 0. Box 9277
Yes_2LNo
Corpus Christi, Texas 78408
If yes, identify and explain:
512- 884 -3011
11. Attachments (check if included):
(a) Clearinghouse review and comment (c) Contracts for services, equipment, and
Name of clearinghouse: constructions
(d) Letters of endorsement
(b) Loral governing body resolution
authorizing application (e) Other (describe)
12. Date:
March 3, 1975
13. Total Pages in Applicatie
25
Form CJD -1 (111/74)
CJD USE ONLY
Grant Number Geographic Area:
Region
Date Received County(s)
Program Area
City
M M
Page 2
Office of the Governor ? Criminal Justice Division
APPLICATION FOR GRANT
Project Title:
I.
IL
Period of Present Request:
From May 111975
Through April 30, 1976
PRESENT PROJECT BUDGET
Budget Category
CJD Support
Federal
and State
Cash
Contribution
Cash
Total
*In -Kind
Contribution
A. Personnel
30,397
A. Personnel
67,851
37,454
B. Professional & Contract Services `
1,905
B. Professional Services
1,905
C. Travel
4,591
C. Travel
4,591
D. Equipment
1,050
D. Equipment
1,050
E. Construction
E. Construction
F. Supplies & Direct Operating Expense
16,712
F. Supplies & Direct Operating Expense
16,712
G. Indirect Cost
5 987
G! Indirect Cost
5 987
H. Total
58 207
11. Total
95,661
37,454
CONTINUATION FUNDING PLAN
ANTICIPATED PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Budget Category
SUBSEQUENT PERIOD—
SUBSEQUENT PERIOD —
CJD Support
Cash
Contribution
CJD Support
Cash
Contribution
A. Personnel
B. Professional Services
C. Travel
D. Equipment
E. Construction
F. Supplies & Direct Operating Expense
G! Indirect Cost
11. Total
I1I. Explanation of grantee cash contribution, in -kind contribution, and continuation funding plan. Describe (1)
nature, (2) source, and (3) project utilization of the grantee contribution for the present project period as
listed in the grantee contribution column of Page 2 of this application. Following this should be an explanation
in the terms described above (nature, source, and project utilization), of how the applicant proposes to support
the project after CJD funding has concluded (attach continuation pages is needed).
NOTE: Initial funding by the CJD does not automatically qualify the project for continuation funding.
*This category is for information purposes only. Total for each category must be supported by Detail Budget
Narrative.
Form CJD-1 (1/1174)
w
•
Page 3
Office of the Governor !'. � Criminal Justice Division
APPLICATION FOR GRANT
BUDGET NARRATIVE
Begin below and add as many continuation pages (3a, 3b, etc.) as may be needed to explain each item of the
project budget. Limit this narrative to an explanation of the basis for arriving at the cost of each item including
grantee contribution items. This section must also describe the applicant's procurement procedures for equipment,
services, and construction, if such items are a part of the project budget.
A. Personnel % of time
CJC
Grantee
Total
1. Salaries
Police Lieutenant (1) 100%
13,320
13,320
Patrolmen (2) 100%
19,200
19,200
Patrolmen (2) 100%
19,200
19,200
Secretary (1) 100%
7,166
7,166
Sub -Total Category A
26,366
32,520
58,886
Fringe Benefits - Salaries
FICA @ 5.8%
1,526
1,886
3,412
Retirement @ 5.9%
1,553
1,765
3,318
Insurance
952
1,283
2,235
Sub -Total Category A
4,031
4,934
8,965
TOTAL CATEGORY A
30,397
37,454
67,851
The City of Corpus Christi will furnish one
(1) Police Lieutenant and
two (2)
Police Patrolmen who will devote 100% of their
time to the
Project.
Criminal
Justice support is requested for two (2) Police Patrolmen,
professional service, equipment, and
one (1) secretary,
required
during the twelve month grant period.
operating expenses
for
the project
Form CJD -1 (1(1(74)
M M
I Page 3 A
B. Professional Services:
Crime Analyst
A consulting crime analyst will be employed to supply ongoing input for analysis
during the project and to define and monitor evaluation criteria during the
project year. Reports will be generated on a quarterly basis to provide on-
going review, with a final evaluation report at the end of the project year.
CJD GRANTEE TOTAL
28 hours per quarter @ 15.00
plus 15 hours for preparing final report
127 hours @ $15.00 per hour 1,905 -0- 1,905
Sub -Total Category B 1,905 -0- 1,905
TOTAL CATEGORY B 1,905 -0- 1,905
C. Training and Travel:
1. Provides for the Project Coordinator
to attend a retraining session and
World Congress on Crime Prevention
at Louisville, Kentucky, May 5 -9,
1975.
Travel
One (1) round trip ticket, air rate
for Corpus Christi, Texas to
Louisville, Kentucky.
Meals @ $7.50 per day for 7 days
Tips @ 10% of meals, plus 50p per day
Laundry $1.00 per day for 7 days
Taxi -cabs @ $2.00 per day for 7 days
Lodging @ $20.00 per day for 5 days
Sub -Total
CJD GRANTEE TOTAL
195
-0-
195
53
-0-
53
9
-0-
9
7
-0-
7
14
-0-
14
100
-0-
100
378
-0-
378
N M
Page 3 B
CJD GRANTEE TOTAL
2. Provides for four (4) trips to
Austin for Project Director to
confer with Project Coordinator
and Governor's Crime Prevention
Committee.
Mileage @ 12% per mile
400 miles
48
-0-
48
Meals - 4 @ $2.50
10
-0-
10
Tips
2
-0-
2
Lodging @ $18.00
18
-0-
18
Expense per trip - 78X4
312
312
Sub -Total
312
-0-
312
3. Provides for one trip per month to
meet with Project Directors from
other participating cities in the
statewide program.
Mileage @ 12p per mile
400 miles
48
-0-
48
Meals - 8 @ $2.50
20
-0-
20
Tips
4
-0-
4
Lodging @ $18.00
36
-0-
36
108
-0-
108
Expense per trip - 108
108 X 12
1,296
-0-
1,296
Sub -Total
1,296
-0-
1,206
4. Provides for members of the Crime
Prevention Unit to attend seminars
on crime prevention, in various
cities not scheduled at the present
time. Two Crime Prevention Officers
to a conference or seminar once per
quarter.
Mileage - Average 800 X 4 X 51,
480
-0-
408
Registration Fee - Average $50 X 8
400
-0-
400
Per diem - 3 days average X 2 men
X 4 trips + 48 man days @ $25
per day
1,200
-0-
1,200
Project Director to National Conference
Air Transportation (estimated)
300
-0-
300
Per diem - 5 days @ $25
125
-0-
125
Registration (estimated)
100
-0-
100
Sub -Total
2,605
-0-
2,605
TOTAL CATEGORY C
4,591
-0-
4,591
N N
D. Equipment and Other Capital Assets
1. Three (3) 16mm motion picture films
on Crime Prevention.
TOTAL CATEGORY D
E. Construction - N/A
F. Supplies and Other Operating Expenses
1. Two (2) Intermediate size sedans and one
Crime Prevention van to be used to
provide mobility for Unit personnel and
for display purposes. Estimated 18,000
miles per vehicle per year = 3X 18,000
= 54,000 miles
54,000 miles at 7C per mile =
2. Postage - Anticipated postage for mailing
crime prevention type material to the
public.
3. Office supplies and printed forms to be
used in office.
4. Service contracts for repair and main-
tenance of typewriter and projectors.
a. 1 - IBM Selectric typewriter
b. 2 - Bell and Howell 6mm projector
c. 1 - Kodak slide projector
d. 1 - Polariod camera
e. 1 - 35mm Pentax camera
5. Dues and membership to National
Association and Texas Crime Prevention
Association in the name of the Corpus
Christi Police Department with the
following officers participating.
a. Project Director - T.C.P.A.
b. Project Supervisor - T.C.P.A.
c. Project Supervisor - N.C.P.A.
d. 1 - Captain - T.C.P.A.
e. 4 - Police Officers T.C.P.A.
Sub -Total
Page 3 C
CJD GRANTEE TOTAL
1,050 -0- 1,050
1,050 -0- 11050
3,780 -0 3,780
300 -0- 300
800 -0- 800
350 -0- 350
10
-0-
10
10
-0-
10
5
-0-
5
10
-0-
10
40
-0-
40
75
-0-
75
N
6. Spare bulbs, 35mm film and accessories
for 35mm camera. Several projects are
scheduled for the grant year which
require extensive use of 35mm color
film. Provides for a close -up lens
for work on points of entry to deter-
mine proper methods of target hardening.
a. Film and developing
b. Close -up lens 49mm
Sub -Total
7. Blazer jackets for five (5) officers @ 75
assigned to the Crime Prevention Unit.
Funds will be utilized in accordance with
standard Corpus Christi Police Department
procedures of purchasing.
8. Television advertising. One five minute
program each month @ 150. These programs
to be used as seed programs for donated
Public Service programs on the basis of
at least two Public Service programs per
each purchased time program.
9. Newspaper advertising - One 9 column -
inch advertisement each two weeks @
$46.44. These purchased ads to be
utilized with donated space for con-
veying specific messages. Cooperation
by the newspaper in donating Public
Service space has been excellent during
the past year.
10. a. Printing costs for Crime Prevention
material generated locally to bring
specific messages to selected target
groups. Art work and printing for
one (1) message per quarter at $200.
b. A total of $6,812 was expended during
1974 for printed material generated
through the state consultants office.
This material included brochures,
posters, T.V. spot films, etc. In
anticipating the 30,000 copies of
printed handouts for 1975, the
generation of local programs for
T.V. advertising, plus expenses for
Commercial art work on a local level,
a similar sum will be required.
TOTAL CATEGORY F
w
Page 3 D
CJD GRANTEE TOTAL
200 -0- 200
25 -0- 200
225 -0- 225
375 -0- 375
1,800 -0- 1,800
1,207 -0- 1,207
800 -0- 800
7,000 -0- 7,000
16,712 -0- 16,712
M
G. Indirect Costs
Indirect Costs computed on the basis of
6.5% of requested Criminal Justice Division
support.
TOTAL CATEGORY G
N
Page 3 E
CJD GRANTEE TOTAL
5,987 -0- 5,897
5,987 -0- 5,987
•
Office of the Governor
APPLICATION FOR GRANT
Project Plan and Support Data
so
Page 4
Criminal Justice Division
This section constitutes the heart of the grant application. It is the applicant's detailed statement of the project —its
aims, precisely what will be done, who will be involved, and what is expected to result. With the project budget, it
constitutes primary evidence to CJD of the soundness of the project, the care and planning that has gone into its
formulation, and the responsibility and qualifications of the applicant and others who will be involved in carrying it
out.
This section consists of two parts: the summary and the detailed project description.
Summary
In the space neiow, write a uner summary or total project.
A. Goals To provide,a program which will enable the Police Department to increase
public awareness of the problems associated with criminal acts and to provide
expertise and guidance to all segments of the community in the prevention of
criminality.
B. Methods The utilization of personnel who have extensive training in crime
prevention methods in bringing messages to the public and other police personnel
designed to attack certain aspects of the problem. Public campaigns directed
towards the crimes of burglaries, thefts, and rapes, and a concerted effort
towards increased participation in Operation Identification.
C. Resources The support of city administrative personnel will continue on a high
level. In— service training of personnel not assignedr.to the Crime Prevention
Unit in specialities associated with crime prevention has been increased and
the resources of the department are dedicated towards enhancing the crime preven-I
tion function.
D. Results A primary goal is to stabilize the burglary rate so no increase will be
indicated during 1975. This would amount to a 9.6% decrease in the rate given
the trend indicated in 1974. The crime of rape, which indicated a 23.3% increase
in 1974, will be given increased attention relative to legislative modification,
police training, and citizen involvement. At least a 10% reduction in the
increase is being sought.
E. Evaluation evaluation team consisting of personnel assigned to the Crime
Prevention Unit and an outside consultant will work together in producing
quarterly reports and will monitor progress continuously in an attempt to measure
the degree to which each goal and objective has been attained.
corm CJD -r (1 /1174)
Office of the Governor
FOR GRANT
DETAIL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
•
Page 4A
Criminal Justice Division
Organize the remainder of this section under the following headings: A. Goals, B. Methods, C. Resources, D.
Results, and E. Evaluation.
Insert after this sheet as many additional pages 4a, 4b, 4c, etc.) as may be needed to complete the description
of the Project Plan and Supporting Data. If the applicant wishes to append documents that cannot be readily
placed on continuation sheets, these documents should be listed on the last page of the Project Plan and copies
furnished with the application for staff review.
A. Goals
1. Problems.
a. The Corpus Christi Police Department with a total of 311 sworn personnel,
serves a community with a population of over 200,000 citizens. This
population is increased by some 30,000 persons who live outside the
city in bedroom communities and commute to and from the city. Some
percentage of these people also contribute to the problem of crime in
Corpus Christi.
b. Index crimes, particularly those in the categories of burglary, larceny,
and rape are increasing dramatically. This national trend is reflected
in Corpus Christi in several categories although the percentage of
increase is below the national experience in most categories.
c. During 1974 the crime of burglary increased by 9.6% over the 1973
experience. This is 3.4% below the increase experienced in all cities
within our population bracket but substantially short of our stated
goals in the 1974 grant year.
(1) Methods of entry
Doors 57.7%
Windows 40.4%
Ceilings 1,8%
Undetermined means of entry make up only .1% of known burglaries.
This would indicate that target hardening and reducing the vulnerability
of doors and windows would reduce the number of these crimes dramatically.
(2) Items commonly taken
Currency
25.5%
Televisions
23.2%
Stereos
20.3%
Firearms
11.1%
Jewelry
10.5%
Business Machines
6.6%
All other merchandise
26.2%
Many of the articles above are multiples taken in the same burglary.
M •
Page 4 B
(3) Average value taken in each category annually.
1973 1974
Currency $ 90,801 $ 109,970 +17.4%
Jewelry 114,843 196,522 +41.7%
Clothing 42,676 41,216 -3.4%
Others 959,091 1,256,070 +23.6%
Our present system measures only four categories. The 1975
report will include more detailed information on many other
categories.
2. Target Groups
a. All the citizens of Corpus Christi will hopefully be affected or will
benefit from the total project. Specifically, analytical information
obtained as a result of the study of statistical data obtained during
the 1974 grant year will be applied to certain areas within the city
and also towards the reduction of particular crimes that have shown a
substantial increase during the last reporting period.
During 1974 an experiment was conducted in a total approach to the
prevention of criminality in a small area within the city. This
particular project incorporated the resources of several of the divisions
within the Police Department in cooperation with the Crime Prevention
Unit to reduce the amount of criminality experienced in that area. A
concerted Crime Prevention Education project was coordinated within
the time frame of the experiment in the same area. A substantial
reduction in the number of total crimes as well as a dramatic reduction
of the crime of burglary (60 %) were noted during this period. Four
similar projects are proposed for 1975 in certain high incidence
census tracts.
During 1974, personnel assigned to the Crime Prevention Unit, as well
as personnel in the Community Relations Unit, increased substantially
the degree of success that could be expected in working with the media
as a result of close personal relationships developed during the time
frame. It is expected that during 1975 these personal contacts will
begin to produce results in terms of public service available at re-
duced rates or as a public service. Expertise has also been developed
among several of the Crime Prevention personnel relative to the preparation
and generation of material to be directed towards specific citizen groups.
As a result of the five hour in- service training course on Crime
Prevention made available to all police personnel during 1974, administra-
tive enthusiasm has been generated which should substantially increase
the degree of supervisory and administrative incentive for all personnel
to become more involved in Crime Prevention programs.
3. Objectives
M
Page 4 C
a. During 1975 we plan to conduct 800 commercial security surveys and
1,200 residential security surveys. This ambitious approach is
practical for several reasons.
(1) The expertise acquired by Crime Prevention officers during 1974
permits a security survey to be conducted quicker and more
efficiently this year than last year.
(2) The transfer from Crime Prevention Unit to other Units in the
Police Department of persons who have experience in making
security surveys permits the use of a larger number of personnel
than those assigned just to the Crime Prevention Unit.
(3) Word of mouth advertising from people who have benefited from
security surveys performed by these officers increases the demand
to the point that many more security surveys will be requested
in 1975 than in 1974.
b. Tenative plans for 1975 include four substantial campaigns on specific
issues.
(1) A campaign to point out the economic impact of burglaries and to
emphasize the number of burglaries suffered by the people through
contests for guessing the number of burglaries. These contests
will be sponsored by several radio stations in the area.
(2) The utilization of personnel in our Explorer Post to saturate
specific areas relative to the Operation Identification program
that has lagged somewhat during the past several months.
(3) The dramatic rise in the number of reported rapes requires a
public awareness and education program which will be conducted by
Crime Prevention personnel in cooperation with Criminal Investigation
Specialists. A Rape Crisis Center is planned during 1975 with close
cooperation with concerned women's groups in the community.
(4) A concentrated effort in coordination with the Corpus Christi
Independant School District to register all bicycles used by school
children within the city. This project should furnish an excellent
vehicle for bringing Crime Prevention information into a large
majority of the homes.
The number of competent personnel who are available for public
speeches has increased in the past year and in 1975 approximately
300 public speeches are planned which will reach a large portion
of persons within the city who belong to civic groups and /or
churches affiliated organizations.
M
B. METHODS
Page 4 D
At least 18 exhibitions are planned with the Crime Prevention van
to be utilized in functions that attract large numbers of persons.
Various security devices and hand out material will be available
at these exhibitions and, in conjunction with these and other pro-
grams, 30,000 pieces of Crime Prevention literature and publications
are to be distributed during 1975.
During the preparation of the grant application with the Crime
Prevention Unit for 1974, very little past experience was available
to personnel preparing the grant. As a result of this lack of
experience, an unrealistic goal of an 18% reduction in the burglary
rate was projected for 1974. This proved to be totally optimistic
and was brought about in part as a result of reporting deficiencies
within the Police Department in the past several years. The 3.18%
reduction in the incidence of burglary in 1973 over 1972 were
primarily the result of these reporting deficiencies. The national
average increase in the crime of burglary of approximately 13%
would have been closer to realism on a projected basis. We are
encouraged however, that although the national average of increase
for the crime of burglary in cities in our population bracket was
13 %, our local increase was only 9.65 %. As a result of expertise
developed in Crime Prevention activities during 1974, our goal for
1975 will be to show a burglary rate that has not increased over
1974. The percentage of reduction of the crime trend indicated by
this figure is difficult to measure, and must be compared against
other cities in the same population brackets and within the same
general geographic area.
1. Unit structure and training components
The size of the Crime Prevention Unit as funded in 1974 consists of a Police
Lieutenant, four Police Officers, and one secretary. This unit structure
will be largely static, augmented by the part -time assistance of a consulting
crime analyst who will work in close cooperation with the Crime Prevention
Unit and other components in the Police Department who are responsible for
many of the same duties. All Crime Prevention personnel have completed the
Texas Crime Prevention Institute's two week course. In addition, three of
the persons assigned to Crime Prevention have attended the National Crime
Prevention Institute's four week course at Louisville, Kentucky. The
Lieutenant in charge of the Crime Prevention Unit has also attended the one
week administrative course offered by the Texas Crime Prevention Institute.
As previously stated, all personnel within the Police Department have received
the five hour short course designed by Texas Crime Prevention Institute and
taught by graduates of the Texas Crime Prevention Institute.
M �
Page 4 E
Twenty -four additional officers from throughout the department, with
specific emphasis on administrative and supervisory personnel, are expected
to complete the two week course in the Texas Crime Prevention Institute
during 1975.
The Corpus Christi Police Department normally operates three Cadet classes
each year to provide new officers for normal attrition and increase in
Department size. The five hour Crime Prevention course is taught to each
of these officers as they go through the Police Academy. Cadet classes
normally have fifteen to twenty recruits attending, with department personnel
sitting in on specialized subjects and academic credit courses.
C. RESOURCES
The Cadet Academy in the Corpus Christi Police Department is now accredited
for fifteen (15) college hours and approximately 35% of the entire force have
accrued college hours in Police Science courses and are currently working
toward degrees in Police Science.
1. Qualifications and Facilities:
The Corpus Christi Police Department is a modern, progressive organization
consisting of three hundred eleven sworn personnel and forty three civilians.
During the past four years the Department has been the recipient of Law
Enforcement Assistance Administration grants in addition to Crime Prevention,
in the areas of:
Radio Communications Systems
Computerized Records System
Police - Citizen Monitoring System
Organized Crime Control
Juvenile Bureau
Community Relations Bureau
Police Legal Advisor
In these and other areas the Department has functioned successfully and
has developed into a well organized entity with career police officers
heading up the various components who are competent, professional, and are
almost all engaged in college level academic work seeking degrees in Police
Science.
The Police Department is housed in a modern, recently re- modeled buildi ng
in the north -east portion of the city. The Crime Prevention Bureau is
temporarily housed in a mobile structure adjacent to the main building
with adequate working space and modern, comfortable, pleasant surroundings.
M it
Page 4 F
2. Staff and Organization
Project Director: W. C. Banner, - Police Commander.
Commander Banner is a 24 year veteran of the Police Department, having
served in successively more responsible positions in all Divisions.
He is currently assigned as Commanding Officer of the Criminal Investigation
Division with command responsibility in the areas of Youth Bureau, Crime
Prevention Bureau, and Community Relations. Commander Banner is 50 years
old and is currently working towards a degree in Police Science through
extension courses at Sam Houston State University.
N N
Page 4 G
Supervisor: 0. B. Bell - Police Captain.
Captain Bell is a 13 year veteran of the Police Department, having
served in Patrol, Special Services, Traffic, and Administration.
He is currently assigned to the Criminal Investigation Division
with primary responsibility in Community Relations, Youth Bureau,
and Crime Prevention. Captain Bell is a graduate of the F. B. I.
National Academy and is currently carrying a full academic load in
Police Science courses at Del Mar college.
Supervisor: B. L. Fontaine - Police Lieutenant.
Lieutenant Fontaine is a veteran of 21 years on the Department,
having been assigned to Patrol, Traffic, Identification, administra-
tion, and Criminal Investigation. He is currently the Commanding
Officer of the Crime Prevention Bureau. Lt. Fontaine is a graduate
of the F. B. I. National Academy and the National Crime Prevention
Institute and is currently scheduled to attend the Texas Crime
Prevention Institute's Administrative course. Lt. Fontaine is work-
ing towards a degree in Police Science at Del Mar College.
Crime Prevention
Lt. Fontaine
J. H. Avant
_Chief of Police
W. C. Banner
C.I.D. Commander
0. B. Bell
C.I.D. Captain
Community Relations
Sgt. Villagomez
Youth Bureau
Lt. Rodriguez
The organizational structure above is due for modifications in the
near future with Crime Prevention, Community Relations, and Youth
Bureau being combined into one unit, i.e., Community Services, and
given Divisional status under a Police Commander.
r� w
Page 4 H
3. Cooperating and Participating Agencies:
The support of the media has been excellent during the past year.
Public Service spots have been available on a continuing basis,
limited only by the capability of the unit to produce material with
a locally identifyable format. In this respect we are currently
preparing two 35mm slide presentations. One is designed to show
the differences between targets of opportunity and hardened targets
in similar environments for burglary prevention. The other will be
designed to speak to the problem of rape prevention. Both of these
presentations will utilize readily identifyable local places and
people and will be put together so that short segments may be shown
depending upon available time.
D. RESULTS
1. Anticipated Results:
During the second grant year the operation of the Crime Prevention
Unit, in conjunction with the cooperation and participation of the
entire Police Department, anticipates that the rise in the crime of
burglary experienced during the past few years will stabilize and
show no increase for the year.
In attempting to measure the percentage of decrease, it is necessary
to consider several factors. The increase of 9.6% during 1974 indicates
some substantial affect as a result of efforts during the year. This
percentage of increase is lower than most other jurisdictions and there
appears to be no decrease in this national trend. If there is no
increase in 1975 the results would establish at least a 9.6% decrease
and would indicate a much greater impact.
During 1975 the crime of rape will get a much greater share of police
attention, and we anticipate a substantial impact on the increasing
statistics in this criminal activity. We anticipate working closely
with groups interested in Rape Crisis Centers with their attention to
needs of the victims.
2. Dissemination:
The Crime Prevention Bureau will report the activity of the Unit on a
quarterly basis as provided by Criminal Justice Division guidelines.
The analyst will formulate a final accumulative report for the state-
wide program which will include the Corpus Christi Crime Prevention
program. Results of quarterly evaluation by a local analyst and a
final evaluation and report by the same analyst will be forwarded
to Criminal Justice Division and disseminated as widely as possible
locally and elsewhere as requested. Interested law enforcement agencies
in any jurisdiction may obtain copies of the final report on the project.
M N
Page 4 I
E. EVALUATION
The Project will be evaluated both internally by Commander W. C. Banner,
Captain 0. B. Bell, and Lieutenant B. Fontaine, and externally by the
consulting crime analyst.
CRIME ANALYST: Kenneth G. Kyle, Ph.D. (Resume Attached)
A. Data used:
The analyst will utilize the standard statistical data produced by the
department in reporting crimes to the F.B.I. on the uniform crime reports
and to the Department of Public Safety. Activity reports at the Crime
Prevention Unit's completion of activities will also be utilized.
B. Methods:
The analyst will analyze statistical data and activity reports to
determine the degree to which objectives have been obtained.
C. Criteria:
The indicators or measures to be used in determining the degree to which
objectives have been obtained are listed below:
Objective #1
A burglary rate for 1975 that does not exceed the 1974 rate.
Indicator or measure
Burglary rate for 1975
Objective #2
Provide the public with information to create an awareness of crime and
what actions would be effective in combating it.
M N
Page 4 J
Indicators or measures
a. Attendance at approximately 300 public speeches planned for civic and /or
church affiliated groups.
b. The number of persons contacted during at least 18 exhibitions planned
with the Crime Prevention Van and the Crime Prevention material
distributed.
Objective #3
Provide a security inspection service to the citizens of Corpus Christi.
Indicators or measures
a. Conduct 800 commercial security surveys.
b. Conduct 1,200 residential security surveys.
c. The degree of compliance with recommendations.
Objective #4
Involve the public in programs to help prevent crime.
Indicators or measures
a. Increase in public utilization of the Operation Identification Program.
b. Registration of bicycles belonging to students in the Corpus Christi
Independaut School District.
Objective #5
Provide timely information to Patrol and other divisions who are interested
in specific targets defined by time of day, day of week, generan location,
etc., on a probability basis.
Indicators or measures
Monthly report indicating the probability of certain crimes based on reported
crimes of the previous month.
N N
Page 4 K
D_ Time of written evaluations:
The analyst, using the data, methods, and criteria set out above,
will make a written assessment of the results of the project on a
quarterly basis and at the end of the project year.
.4
N
STATISTICS FOR THE YEARS 1972, 1973, 1974
1972
HOMICIDE
29
RAPE
71
ROBBERY
324
ASSAULT
1364
BURGLARY
4462
LARCENY
+23.88%
AUTO THEFT
924
*GRAND TOTAL CRIME
- 11.31%
14,525
N
Page 4 L
1973
PERCENTAGE
1974
PERCENTAGE
26
- 10.34%
30
+15.38%
67
-5.63%
83
+23.88%
442
+36.41%
392
- 11.31%
1416
+3.81%
1535
+8.40%
4323
-3.18%
4738
+9.65%
3982
4677
+17.40%
999
+8.11%
854
- 14.51%
18,699
+2.23%
20,631
+9.30%
N
R E S U M E
KENNETH G. KYLE, Ph.D.
Date of Birth - January 18, 1940
Place of Birth - Dumar, Texas
EXPERIENCE
1974 to date
1973
1972
1969 -1972
1966 -1969
1966
1962 -1966
EDUCATION
1962
1972
N
Director of Planning and Evaluation,
Corpus Christi Independent School
District.
Assistant Director of Planning and
Evaluation,
Corpus Christi Independent School
District.
Evaluation Specialist,
Corpus Christi Independent School District.
Graduate student,
University of Texas at Austin.
Teacher,
Amarillo Independent School District.
Graduate student,
West Texas State University.
Commissioned Officer,
United States Navy.
B.A. in Mathematics,
Hardin - Simmons University.
Ph.D. in Educational Psychology
(Measurement and Evaluation, Statistics,
and Computer Applications),
University of Texas at Austin.
N N
Page 5
Office of the Governor Criminal Justice Division
Application for Grant
Project Title:
The following standard grant conditions, (where applicable), must be certified and agreed to by the
applicant in order to validate the application. Also, where a condition is applicable and requires additional
information, such information should be included in or as an addition to the application. (Additional
explanation of these grant conditions may be found in CJD publication Guide for Grant Administration.)
Standard Grant Conditions
1. Project initiation. Acceptance of the grant award must be returned to the CJD within 30 days after the
date of the award. if an approved project has not commenced within 60 days after acceptance of the
grant award, the grantee w ;ll report by letter the steps taken to initiate the project, reasons for the
delay, and expected starting date. If 90 days after acceptance of the award the project is not opera-
tional, a further statement of implementation delay will be submitted by the grantee to the Criminal
Justice Division. On receipt of the 90-day letter CJD may cancel the project and redistribute the funds
to other project areas. CJD, where warranted by extenuating circumstances, may request approval from
the LEAA regional office to extend the implementation date of the project past the 90-day period.
2. Project completion. With the exception of the final project report, final financial report, and liquida-
tion of goods or services encumbered before the termination date, grants must be completed no later
than the termination date set forth in the Statement of Grant Award or any approved extension
thereof. Grantees should keep in mind the grant condition prohibiting the obligation of funds beyond
such termination dates, the requirement for liquidation of obligations within 90 days after the termina-
tion date, and the requirement for the return of unobligated grant funds within such period.
3. Reports. The grantee shall submit, at such times and in such forms as may be prescribed, any reports
that the Criminal Justice Division may require, including quarterly financial and progress reports and
final financial and progress reports. The grantee's failure to submit required reports within the
prescribed time constraits may result in unnecessary delays in the processing of request for funds.
4. Fiscal regulations. The fiscal administration of grants shall be subject to such rules, regulations, and
policies concerning accounting and records, payments of funds, cost allowability, submission of
financial reports, etc., as may be presecribed by CJD, including those set forth in the CJD Guide for
Grant Adfr+inistratlon.
5. Utilization and payment of funds. Funds awarded may be expended only for purposes and activities
covered by the grantee's approved project plan and budget. Payments will be made on the basis of
periodic requests and estimates of fund needs submitted by the grantee. Payments will be adjusted to
correct previous overpayments or underpayments and disallowances resulting from audit.
6. Written approval of changes. Grantees must obtain prior written approval from CJD for major project
changes. These include (a) changes of substance in project activities, design, or research plans set forth
in the approved application; (b) changes in the project director or other key personnel identified in the
approved application; (c) expenditure of project funds representing more than a 15 percent or $2,500
variation, whichever is greater, in any category of the total approved budget, including both CJD grant
funds and grantee contribution; and (d) all additions to or deletions of approved equipment purchases.
Any project changes in the grantee's prerogative to initiate are subject to cost allowability and budget
guidelines that may be described in the CJD publications mentioned in the preamble to this section.
7. Application review changes. Any changes effected in this application as a result of or during the course
N N
Page 5A
of CJD review will be deemed to have been ratified by the grantee upon CJD's receipt of the grantee's
request for funds or acceptance agreement.
8. Maintenance of records. Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, required reports,
and all other records pertinent to the grant project or any component part thereof shall be retained for
three years from the date of the grantee's submission of the final expenditure report, except that
records for nonexpendable property acquired with federal grant funds shall be retained for three years
after final disposition. The records shall be retained beyond the three -year period if audit findings have
not been resolved. Provisions to this effect must be included in all contracts, subcontracts, or other
arrangements for implementation of this project or any component thereof.
9 Inspection and audit. The State of Texas, the U.S. Department of Justice, and the Comptroller Genetal
of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives shall have access to any books,
documents, papers, and records pertinent to this grant project for the purpose of making audit,
examination, excerpts, and transcripts. A provision to this effect shall be included in all contracts,
subcontracts, or other arrangements for implementation of this project or any component therof.
10. Termination of aid. A grant may be terminated or fund payments discontinued by CJD if it finds a
substantial failure to comply with the provisions of P.L. 90.351 or regulations promulgated thereunder,
including these grant conditions or application obligations, but only after notice and hearing and"
pursuant to all procedures set forth in Sections 510 and 511 of P.L. 90.351.
11. Obligation of grant funds. Grant funds may not, without advance written approval by CJD, be obli.
gated prior to the effective date or subsequent to the termination date of the grant period. Obligations
outstanding as of the termination date shall be liquidated within 90 days. Such obligations must be
related to goods or services provided and utilized for ultimate program purposes.
12. Title to property. Title to property acquired wholly or partly with grant project funds in accordance
with approved budgets shall vest in the grantee, subject to divestment at the option of LEAA or CJD
(to the extent federal funds contributed to the acquisition thereof) exercisable only on notice within
180 days after the end of the grant period or termination of the grant. The grantee shall exercise due
care in the use, maintenance, protection, and preservation of such property during the period of
grantor interest.
13. Use of property for law enforcement purposes. All property acquired with grant project funds or
donated property representing a grantee contribution shall be committed to use for law enforcement
purposes throughout its useful life.
14. Project income. All interest or other income earned by a grantee with respect to grant funds or as a
result of conduct of the grant project (sale of publications, registrations fees, service charges on fees,
etc.) must be accounted for. Income should be applied to project purposes or in reduction of project
cost Interest earned on grant funds must be returned to CJD. All other project income must be applied
to project purposes or as a reduction of total project cost.
15. Publications. The grantee may publish, at its own expense, the results of grant activity without prior
CJD review provided that any publication (written. visual, or sound) contains an acknowledgement of
CJD grant support. The following disclaimer must be contained in the aforementioned acknowledge-
ment:
The fact that the Criminal Justice Division furnished financial support to the activity described in
this publication does not necessarily indicate the concurrence of the Criminal Justice Division in
the statements or conclusions contained herein.
At least 25 copies of any such publication must be furnished to CJD but only 10 copies of training
materials (where used,in grant project) must be supplied, except as otherwise requested or approved by
CJD. Publication of.documents or reports with giant Hinds beyond quantities required to meet stan.
dard report requirenients must be provided for in approved project plans or budgets or otherwise
approved by CJD and, for large quantity publicaticit, manuscripts must be submitted in advance to
CJD.
C
N N
Page 5B
16. Copyrights. where activities supported by this grant produce original books, rn, m:als, films, computer
programs (including executable computer programs and supporting data in ony ;nrn), or other copy -
righlable material, the grantee may copyright such, but CJD reserves a royaltydr.-e, no :,excic;i :e, and
irrevocable license to produce, publish, and use such materials, and to ala'.iori7e ahers to do so.
Disposition of royalLies will be determined by CJD. Provisions appropriate to ef:t•civate the purposes
of this condition must be in all employment contracts, consultants' agreement,, :md otlier cmitiacts.
17. Patents. If any discovery or invention arises or is developed in the course of or as a result of work
performed under this grant, by the grantee or contractor, the grantee shall r.^:er the discovery or
invention to CJD, which will determine whether or not patent protection will be sought; how any
rights therein, including patent rights, will be disposed of and administered; and the need for other
action required to protect the public interest in work supported with federal fu.:ds, all in accordance
with the Presidential Memorandum of October 10, 1963, on Government Patent Policy. In the final
narrative report the grantee shall identify any discovery or invention arising u ider or developed in the
course of or as a result of work performed under this grant or shall certify ;h. ^.t there are no such
inventions or discoveries.
18. Allowable costs. The allowability of costs incurred under any grant shall be determined in accordance
with the general principles of ailowability and standards for selected cost items set forth in Office of
Management and Budget Circular A -87, `Principles for Determining Costs Applicable to Grants and
Contracts with State and Local Governments;' as further defined and delimited in conditions in the
CJD Guide for Grant Administration. Educational institutions are subject to standards set forth in
OMB Circular A -21.
19. Expenses not allowable. Grant funds may not be expended for (a) items not part of the approved
budget or separately approved by CJD; (b) purchase of land and construction of buildings or imple-
mentation of improvements thereon, or payment of real estate mortgages or takes, unless specifically
provided for in the grant agreement: (c) entertainment, amusements, or social activities, or incidental
costs related thereto; (d) purchase of automobiles or other automotive vehicles unless provided for in
the grant agreement; or (e) indirect (overhead) costs, if the granter does not iLa:e an indirect cost
allocation plan and rate acceptable to CJD, except negotiated Jump sum amounts included in the
approved application budget.
20. Proposal costs. Grant funds may not be committed or expended for costs of preparing proposals
without prior CJD approval.
2L Third party participation. No contract or agreement not incorporated in the approved proposal or
approved in advance by CJD may be entered into by the grantee for execution of project activities or
provision of services to a grant project (other than purchase of supplies oe standard commercial or
maintenance services less than $2,500). Any such arrangements shrill provide that the grantee will
retain ultimate control and responsibility for the grant project and that the contractor shall be bound
by these grant conditions and any other requirements applicable to the grantee in the conduct of the
project.
22. Clean Air Act. In accordance with Presidential Executive Order 11602 and the provisions of the Clean
Air Act, 42 USC 1857 et seq., as amended by P.L. 91 -604, 1970, any grant may be terminated and
expenditure of federal funds will be discontinued if at any time during the grant period the grantee has
been convicted of an offense under the Clean Air Act. Grantee may not contract with any party
convicted under the Clean Air Act. Applicant certifies that it has not been convicted of any violation
of the Clean Air Act.
23. Hatch Act. All persons funded by or contributing to this project agree to comply with Title 5, Chapter
15, Sections 1501 through 1508 and any amendments thereto, United States Code Annotated, more
commonly known as the "Hatch Act" relating to political activities.
24. Release of information. Pursuant to Section 521 of the Act, all records, reports, paper;, and other
documents kept by recipients of CJD funds, including grantees and their contractors, relating to the
receipt and disposition of such funds are required to be made available to CJD and LEAH, under the
terms and conditions of the Federal Freedom of Information Act.
w w
Page 5C
25. Relocation assistance. In conformance with the requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance
and Land Acquisitions Policies Act of 1970 (42 USC 4633), applicant hereby declares that this project
will not result in the displacement of one or more persons, businesses, or farm operations, and that no
real property shall he acquired for project purposes. If this declaration cannot be made, CJD will
provide the applicant a Relocation Assistance Certificate that must be completed before consideration
of the application.
26. Environmental impact. Any application for a grant involving: (a) construction, purchase, or alteration
of facilities; (b) implementation of programs involving the use of herbicides and pesticides; or (c) other
actions determined by the LEAA Regional Administrator to have a possibly significant effect on the
quality of the environment must include either a draft environmental statement as required by Section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act or a declaration that the proposed action will not
have a significant impact on the environment.
27. Historic sites. In any grant project involving construction, renovation, purchasing, or leasing of facilities
the grantee shall consult with the state liaison officer for historic preservation to determine whether
the undertaking may have an effect on properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places. If
the undertaking may have an adverse effect on the listed program properties CJD must be notified
before consideration of the application.
28. Education support. No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from
participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education
program or activity receiving CJD financial assistance with the exception of the qualifications set forth
in Title IX, Section 901(A) of Public Law 92.318 (86 Stat. 373).
To validate this application, the following special items must be certified and agreed to by the applicant:
Special Items
Nonsupplanting requirement. In compliance with the requirement that federal funds, made available under
Part C, Title L Public Law 90 -351, as amended, be used "not to supplant state or local funds," this is to
certify that the below described recipient of federal funds under Part C, Title I, Public Law 90.351, as
amended, will use such funds to increase state or local funds that would, in the absence of such federal aid,
be made available for law enforcement purposes. It is understood that the above certification by the
financial officer will be required on the final report of expenditures and status of action grant funds.
Assurance of compliance with Civil Rights Act of 1964. The applicant hereby agrees that it will comply and
will insure compliance by its contractors with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 83 -352)
and all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Regulations of the Department of Justice (29 CRF Part-42)
issued pursuant to that title, to the end that no person shall on the grounds of race, color, or national origin
be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination
under any program or activity for which the applicant receives federal financial assistance. The grantee
further will comply with and insure compliance by its contractors with Justice Department equal employ-
ment regulation in federally assisted programs to the end that employment discrimination in such programs
on the grounds of race, color, creed, sex, or national origin shall be eliminated. The grantee recognizes the
right of the United States to seek judicial enforcement in its contracts. Assurance of compliance with Title
28, Part 42, nondiscrimination; equal opportunity; Police and Procedures— Subpart E —Equal Opportunity
Guidelines. The applicant hereby agrees that U has complied with the requirements of Subpart E and has
filed the required certification and where applicable has on file a current affirmative action plan.
Applicant's agreement. It is understood and agreed by the applicant that any grant received as a result of
this application shall be subject to the above standard conditions, special items, and other policies and rules
Issued by the Criminal Justice Division for administration of grant projects; all provisions under P.L.
90.351, as amended; and memoranda issued by CJD.
t" Date:
Form GID -1 (1/1174)
Certified by:
Signature
Name
Title "
Agency
Corpus Christi, Texas
day of ✓ 19 �S
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Corpus Christi, Texas
For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing
ordinance, a public emergency and imperative necessity exist for the suspen-
sion of the Charter rule or requirement that no ordinance or resolution shall
be passed finally on the date it is introduced, and that such ordinance or
resolution shall be read at three meetings of the City Council; I, therefore,
request that you suspend said Charter rule or requirement and pass this ordi-
nance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the
City Council.
RespecEL
MAYOR
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
The Charter rule was suspended by the following vote:
Jason Luby
James T. Acuff
Rev. Harold T. Branch
Thomas V. Gonzales
Ricardo Gonzalez
Gabe Lozano, Sr.
J. Howard Stark
The above ordinance was passed by the following vote:
Jason Luby
James T. Acuff
Rev. Harold T. Branch
Thomas V. Gonzales
Ricardo Gonzalez
Gabe Lozano, Sr.
J. Howard Stark