HomeMy WebLinkAbout13166 ORD - 05/05/19763kh:5 -5 -76; 1st..
AN ORDINANCE
CLOSING THE HEARING ON STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE
FOLLOWING STREET:
Starlite Lane (M.H. 152) from Leopard Street to
Sunny Drive, Project'No. M 8030 (1)
�1_
AND FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PROPERTY ABUTTING
SAID STREET WILL BE SPECIFICALLY BENEFITED AND
ENHANCED IN VALUE IN EXCESS OF COST OF THE IMPROVE-
MENTS AND LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT; F A LIEN AND
CHARGE, THE MANNER AND TIME OF PAYMENT AND COLLECTION;
AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas
by duly enacted ordinance passed and approved on.the 31st 'day of March, 1976
determined the necessity for, and ordered the improvement of the following
street:
Starlite Lane.(M.H. 152) from Leopard Street to Sunny Drive,
Project No. M 8030.(1)
in the manner and according to the plans and specifications heretofore
--approved •and adopted by the City Council by ordinance dated March 31, 1976
a duly executed notice of said ordinance having been filed in the name
of the City with the County Clerk'of Nueces County, Texas; and
WHEREAS, the said City Council has caused the Director of
Engineering and Physical Development to prepare and file estimates of
the cost of such improvements and estimates of the amount per front
foot proposed to be assessed against the property abutting upon a por-
tion of the aforesaid streets within the limit herein defined, to be
improved, and the real and true owners thereof, and said Director of
Engineering Physical Development has heretofore filed said estimates
f and a statement'of other matters relating thereto with said City Council,
iand same has been received, examined and approved by said City Council;
I
and
131-66
f?EMMAS, said City Council, by duly enacted ordinance dated
March 31, 1976 did determine the necessity of levying an assessment
for that portion of the cost of constructing said improvements on the -•
above named streets, within the limits herein defined, to be paid by
the abutting property and the real and true owners thereof, and by
ordinance dated' March 31, 1976 did order and set a hearing to be
held at 7:00 P.M.—, on the 30 day of April 1976 in the
Annaville Elementary School in *the City of Corpus Christi, Texas,
for the real and true owners of the property abutting upon said streets,
within the limits above defined,and for all others owning rjr claiming
any interest in, or otherwise interested in said property, or any of said
matters as to the assessments and amounts to be assessed against each
parcel or abutting property and the real and true owners thereof, and as
to the special benefits to accrue to said abutting property by virtue
of said improvements, if any, or concerning any error, invalidity,
irregularity or deficiency in any proceedings, or contract, to appear
and be heard in person or by counsel and offer evidence in reference to
said matters; and the City Council did by said ordinance order and
direct the City to give notice of said hearing to the owners abutting
upon said street as shown by the current ad valorem tax roll by
mailing such notice to such owners and publishing said notice at
.least _three. times in the Corpus Christi Times before the date of the
hearing, such notice of mail and by publication being in compliance with
the provisions of Article 1105b of Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes
of Texas; and
WHEREAS, such notice was given said owners of property as
shown on the current ad valorem tax roll within the limits of the
street being improved by mailing such notice at least fourteen (14)
days prior to the hearing to such owners and by publishing three times
notice of such hearing in the Corpus Christi Times, the first of which
publication was at least twenty -one (21) days prior to the date of said
hearing; both forms of notice being in compliance with and containing the
information required by Article 1105b, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes;
and
IIHEREAS, after due, regular and proper notice thereof, all as
provided by law and the Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, said hearing
of which notice was given, was opened and held on April 30, 1976, in the
Annaville Elementary School , in the City of Corpus Christi,
Texas, in accordance with said ordinance and notice, at which time an
opportunity was given to all said abovementioned persons, firms, corpora-
tions and estates, their agents and attorneys, to be heard and to offer
evidence as to all matters in accordance with said ordinance and notice,
at which time the following appeared and offered the following testimony:
-3-
*Mayor Jason Luby
Mayor Pro Tem Bill Tipton
Council Members:
Eduardo E. de Ases City Manager R. Marvin Townsend
Ruth Gill Assistant City Attorney Chas. DuBois
Bob Gulley City Secretary Bill G. Read
Gabe Lozano, Sr.
Edward Sample
Mayor Pro Tem Tipton called the meeting to order in the temporary absence
of Mayor Luby.
City Secretary Read called the roll and stated there was a quorum of the
Council and the necessary Charter Officers present to have a legally constituted meeting.
Assistant City Attorney DuBois questioned Mr. Gerry Smith, Chief Engineer in
the Department of Engineering and Physical Development, as to his qualifications; a .
formal resume of his qualifications was offered into evidence and is attached hereto
as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference, the same as if written herein.
Mr. Smith explained the project, consisting of excavation to a width and depth necessary
to provide for the construction of 's roadway varying in width from 39' to 45' including
curb and gutter on Starlite Lane from Leopard Street to Sunny Drive. He explained that '
the improvements were approved by the voters in the 1972 bond election; that it would
be a joint project with the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation. He
reviewed the assessment rates for the project per square foot and stated that the total
contract price would be $303,864.41; the preliminary assessments totaled $73,730.73; and .
the total City /State portion is $230,133.68,
Assistant City Attorney DuBois questioned real estate dealer and appraiser
Harold A. Carr as to his qualifications; a formal resume of his qualifications was
offered into evidence and is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by
reference, the same as if written herein, Mr. Carr stated he had examined each and
every parcel of land involved in the project; he responded that be had found some
irregular - shaped lots; and that, subject to his suggested revisions, in his opinion
each piece of property on the assessment roll would be enhanced in value at least to
the extent of the individual assessment.
MINUTES
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEAS
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
ANNAVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
APRIL 30, 1976
7:00 P.M.
PRESENT:
*Mayor Jason Luby
Mayor Pro Tem Bill Tipton
Council Members:
Eduardo E. de Ases City Manager R. Marvin Townsend
Ruth Gill Assistant City Attorney Chas. DuBois
Bob Gulley City Secretary Bill G. Read
Gabe Lozano, Sr.
Edward Sample
Mayor Pro Tem Tipton called the meeting to order in the temporary absence
of Mayor Luby.
City Secretary Read called the roll and stated there was a quorum of the
Council and the necessary Charter Officers present to have a legally constituted meeting.
Assistant City Attorney DuBois questioned Mr. Gerry Smith, Chief Engineer in
the Department of Engineering and Physical Development, as to his qualifications; a .
formal resume of his qualifications was offered into evidence and is attached hereto
as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference, the same as if written herein.
Mr. Smith explained the project, consisting of excavation to a width and depth necessary
to provide for the construction of 's roadway varying in width from 39' to 45' including
curb and gutter on Starlite Lane from Leopard Street to Sunny Drive. He explained that '
the improvements were approved by the voters in the 1972 bond election; that it would
be a joint project with the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation. He
reviewed the assessment rates for the project per square foot and stated that the total
contract price would be $303,864.41; the preliminary assessments totaled $73,730.73; and .
the total City /State portion is $230,133.68,
Assistant City Attorney DuBois questioned real estate dealer and appraiser
Harold A. Carr as to his qualifications; a formal resume of his qualifications was
offered into evidence and is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by
reference, the same as if written herein, Mr. Carr stated he had examined each and
every parcel of land involved in the project; he responded that be had found some
irregular - shaped lots; and that, subject to his suggested revisions, in his opinion
each piece of property on the assessment roll would be enhanced in value at least to
the extent of the individual assessment.
Deg 0Special Council Meeting
April 30, 1976
Page 2
City Manager Townsend informed the Council that Mr, Carr had recommended
that a number of the assessments be reduced from $10,31 per linear foot for business
uses to $4.75 p.l.f. for residential uses; and that the Staff agrees with the suggested
reductions —with the exception of parcels gl and #15— providing the property owners file
a deed restriction limiting their property to residential uses.
Mayor Pro Tem Tipton called for those from the audience who would like to
speak regarding their assessments, and Mrs. Agnes R. McCorkle, Lot. #1, showed the
Council a map which totaled her property at 297' rather than 400' as the Staff had
determined. She complained that although she wanted the street improved she didn't -
want to have to pay that much; that only a small portion (94') of the property is used
for business purposes, and the rest is residential; that she should not be charged the
full commercial rate. She added she does not intend to develop the property for.some time.
City Manager Townsend responded that the Staff had determined that the zoning
map shows 400' of property, all zoned B -4, and this figure was verified with the Planning
Department. Mr. Townsend explained to Mrs. McCorkle that she would need to file a
deed restriction on her property, limiting it to residential uses; however, she was
unwilling to do that.
Mr. Gene Tackett of the Staff met with Mrs. McCorkle concerning her assessment.
Mrs. Adolph C. Conrad, Lot #24. asked what would be the cost for hookup to the
City sewer system; City Manager Townsend replied that it costs $2.00 per front property
foot, plus a $50 tap charge, which the Staff totaled for Mrs. Conrad. He also added
that she would not be forced to tie onto the sewer if they have a satisfactory septic
tank," system on their property.
*(Mayor Luby arrived at this time.)
Mrs. Frances Dean Morris, Lot 9, questioned the necessity of curbs, gutters
and sidewalks. City Manager Townsend responded that if the residents in her subdivision
want them they would need to petition for them.
Mr. Lewis W. Williams,. Lot 40, inquired regarding the payment for the assessments,
and Mr. Gerry Smith explained the terms of payment available to the property owners.
Mr. Williams also complained that the sidewalks to be constructed on his property would
probably not be used very much, but would cost a great deal. Since several other property
owners appeared to be in opposition to the construction of sidewalks in the area, this
discussion was reserved until the end of the meeting after all other questions had been
resolved.
�es
Special Council Meeting
April 30, 1916
Page 3
•
Mrs. Melvin Adair, owner of Lot 015 regarding which the Staff was in
disagreement with Mr. Carr.concerning the assessment rate, explained that she has
6 7/11 acres on which she raises and sells vegetables, plants and house plants, and
that she also has some greenhouses on the property. The Staff then decided it was 4
home occupation, "R 71B ", and should be assessed at the $4.75 rate rather than $10.31
for business uses.
Mr. Billy J. Burton, Lot 113, stated he has no objection to the construction
of sidewalks in the area.
Mrs. Robert E. Brennan, 042, voiced that she would like to have the dedicated
roadway in the area either built by the County as promised, or abandoned. She was
advised to contact the County relative to their agreement to build the road; and if
that fails to contact the City for a public hearing to abandon it..
Mrs. Alice Fulton, Lots 043 and 044, said she didn't9hink there was any need
for sidewalks.
Mr. Max E. Morgan, Lot 029, and Mrs. E. R. Michael, Lot 017, said they were
satisfied with their assessments.
There was some discussion of where the mailboxes would be placed after the
street improvements are completed. The Staff explained the requirements of the U.-S.
Postal Service; that the existing mailboxes would be reinstalled if they are serviceable,
and they would be placed in the sidewalks parallel to the curb. Some of the residents
voiced their objections to having the mailboxes in the sidewalks, adding that it would
not create a very neat appearance since they would not be of uniform height.
Mrs. Adair stated again that she was not in favor of the sidewalks; and she
felt that eliminating the sidewalks would solve the problem with the Postal Service.
Some of the residents said the sidewalks would not be used very much anyway; however,
one gentleman spoke up that he had seen a lot of people walking down the street Starlite
Lane.
Mayor Luby stated that he very strongly favors sidewalks, citing that they
greatly enhance the property and surrounding area. Council Member Gulley asserted that
it is a lot safer for the children and everybody concerned to have sidewalks; and Mayor
Pro Tem Tipton pointed out that the property owners would only pay $.75 per square foot
at this time, whereas if they were constructed at a later date the cost to them would
be much higher.
Motion by Tipton, seconded by Lozano and passed unanimously, that the hearing
be closed.
�al •
Speci Council Meeting
April 30, 1976
Page 4
There being no further business to come before the Council, this Special
Council Meeting of April 30, 1976 adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
There being no further testimony offered or any further parties
appearing to be heard, upon proper motion, duly seconded and unanimously
carried, the said hearing was declared closed; and
WHEREAS,.no further parties appearing and no further testimony
-being offered as -to the special benefits in relation to the enhanced value
of said abutting property as' compared to cost of the improvements of said
Portion of said streets proposed to be assessed against said property, or
as to any errors,_invalidities or irregularities, in the proceeding or
contract heretofore had in reference to the portions of said streets to
be improved; and
WHEREAS, said City Council has heard evidence as to the special
benefits and enhanced value to accrue to said abutting property, and the
real and true owner or owners thereof, as compared with the cost of making
said improvements on said streets within the limits above defined, and has
heard all parties appearing and offering testimony, together with all pro-
tests and objectionsi relative to such matters and as to any errors, invalidi-
ties.or irregularities in any of.the proceedings and contract for said im-
provements, and has given a full and fair hearing to all parties making or .
desiring to make any such protest, objection or offer testimony and has
fully examined and considered all evidence, matters, objections and protests
offered and based upon said evidence,. testimony and statements, said City
Council finds that each and every parcel of property abutting upon the
portion of the streets aforesaid within the limits to be improved as herein
defined, will be enhanced in value and specially benefited by the construe -
tion of said improvements upon the said streets upon which said property
abuts, in an'amount in excess of the amount of the cost of said improvements
proposed to be, and as hereinbelow assessed against each and every said
parcel of abutting property , and the real and true owners thereof, and said
City Council did consider and correct all errors, invalidities or deficiencies
called to its attention and did find that all proceedings and contracts were
proper and in accordance with. the Charter of said City and the laws of the
State of Texas, under which those proceedings were being had, and the pro-
f ceedings of said City Council heretofore had with reference to such
4
improvements, and in all respects to be valid and regular; and said City
Council did further find upon said evidence that the assessments herein -
below made and the charges hereby declared against said abutting property
on the portions of the streets hereinabove described, within the limits
defined, and the real and true owner or owners thereof, are just and
equitable and did adopt the rule of apportionment set out below and the
division of the cost of said improvements between said abutting properties,
-and the real-and true owner or owners thereof, as just and equitable,
and as producing substantial equality considering the benefits to be
received and the burdens imposed thereby, and that all objections and
protests should be overruled and denied except the corrections and changes
as•appear on the final assessment roll included in this ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TERAS;
SECTION 1. That there being no further protest or testimony for.'
or against said improvements, said hearing granted to the real and true
- owners of abutting property on said streets, within the limits above defined,
and to all persons, firms, corporation; and estates, owning or claiming
same or any interest therein, be and the same is hereby closed and all.
protests and objections, whether specifically mentioned or not, shall be,
S
and the sasee are hereby overruled and denied.
SECTION 2. That said City Council hereby finds and determines
upon the evidence heard in reference to each and every parcel or property
abutting upoh.the aforesaid streets, within the limits defined, that the
special benefits in the enhanced value to 'accrue to said property and the
real and true' owner or owners thereof, by virtue to the construction of
said improvements to said .portian of said streets upon which said property
abuts, will be in excess of the amount of the cost of said improvements
as proposed to be, and as herein assessed against said abutting property
and the real and true owners thereof, and finds that the apportionment of
the cost of -said improvements, and that all assessments hereinbelow made
are just and equitable and produce substantial equality considering the
5
•
•
benefits received and the burdens imposed thereby, and are in accordance
with the laws of the State of Texas, and the Charter provisions of the City
of Corpus Christi, Texas, and that the proceedings and contract heretofore
had with reference to said improvements are in all respects regular, proper
and valid, and that all prerequisites to the fixing of the assessment liens
against said abutting properties, as hereinabove described and the personal
liability of the real and true owner or owners thereof, whether named or
correctly named herein or not, have been in all things regularly had and
performed in compliance with the law, Charter provisions and proceedings of
the said City Council.
SECTION 3. That in pursuance of said ordinances, duly enacted
by said City Council, authorizing and ordering the improvements of the above
described street, within the limits defined, and in pursuance of said
.proceedings heretofore had and enacted by said City Council, in reference - -
to said improvements and by virtue of the powers vested in said City with
respect to said street improvements by the laws of the State of Texas and
the Charter of said City, with particular reference to Chapter 106 of the
Acts of the First Called Session of tha 40th Legislature of the State of
Texas, known and shown as Article 1105b of Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes
of Texas, as. amended, there. shall be, and is hereby levied, assessed and
taxed against the respective parcels or property abutting upon said portion
of -said streets, and against the real and true owners thereof, whether such
real and true owner or owners be named or correctly named herein or not,
the several sums of money hereinbelow mentioned and itemized opposite the
description of the respective parcels of said property, the number of front
feet of each and the several amounts assessed against same. and the real and.
true owner or owners thereof, and `names of the apparent owners thereof, all
as corrected and adjusted by said City Council, being as follows, to -wit-
6
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
10,1 6, 1976
STARLITE LANE
This project includes the extension and construction of street improvements on
the following streets:
Starlite Lane (M.R. 152) from Leopard Street to Sunny Drive;
Project No. M R035 (1)
The improvements'shall consist of excavation to a width and depth necessary
to provide for the construction of a roadway varying in width from 39' to 45'
including curb and gutter. The roadway section will be composed of 6" of
compacted lime stabilized subgrade, 6" of base material compacted and lime
treated, one course of undersea) surface treatment and 2" of asphalt- concrete
riding surface. Other improvements shall include 4" thick reinforced concrete
sidewalks and 6" thick reinforced concrete driveways where specified on the
construction plans or requested by the abutting property owners.
This project is built jointly by the City and the State Department of Highways
and Public Transportation. This project was bid together with improvements
to North Staples Street and Winnebago Street.
The assessment rates have been calculated in accordance with the City's paving
assessment policy based on the low bid submitted to the State Department of
Highways and Public Transportation on March 24, 1976. The assessment rates
for this project are as follows:
Cutb, Gutter and Pavement (39' width) @ $10.31 p.l.f.
Sidewalk @ $ .75 p.s.f.
Driveway @ $18.11 P.S.Y.
Total Contract Price $303,864.41 -
Preliminary Assessments 59,Lgtlq
Total City /State Port $_244,816.72
ames R. Loatos, ., Director
Engineering & Physical Development
Page 1
ITEM
NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
a
DES&IPFION
OF
ASSESSMERT
RATE
AMDDNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
STARL
TE LANE
Le
pard Street
to Sunny Drive
EAST
SIDE
1.
Agnes R. McCorkle
977.10 L. I.
C.G.& Pvmt.
10.31
10,073.90
4366 Starlite Lane
4,207.95 S. T.
S/W 4.5'
.75.
3.155.96
J. R. Donnan Tract
31.22 S. I.
D/W lm-16,1-18'18.11
565.39
78410
& 1 -12
$13,793.25
2.
Manuel Rios
75.00 L. T.
C.G.& Pvmt.
10.31
773.25
% Agnes R. MCCo'rkle
337.50 S. I.
S/W 4.5'
.75
253.13
4366 Starlite Lane
- 0 - S. I.
D/W
18.11
- 0 -
J. R. Donnas Tr.
_
78410
* 609.38
*Reduced by C. A.
3.
Billy J. Burton et.ux S
130.18 L. I.
C.G.& Pvmt.
2.38
309.83
10756 Larkwood F
24.00 LA.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
114.00
Lot 1, Blk. 5
520.72 S. I.
S/W
.38
197.87
Westwood Hts. 2
- 0 = S. I.
D/W
18.11
- 0 -
*Return on Larkwood St.
621.70 ..
507 on side
78410
LARRW
STREET
4.
R. L. Lightfoot, et ux S
130.18 L. I.
C.G.& Pvmt.
2.38
309.83
10829 Mayfield F
24.00 L. I.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
114.00
Lot 39, Blk.4
520.72 S. I.
S/W
.38
197.87
Westwood Hts. @
- 0 - S.
. D/W
18.11
- 0 -
*Return on Larkwood St.
621.70
50% on side
78410
Page
ITEM
OWNER AND
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
NO.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
ASSESSED
OF
RATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT
ASSESSED
5.
Francis Dean Morrie S
130.18 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
2.38
309.83
P. 0. Box 10367 78410 F
* 24.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
114.00
Lot 1, Blk. 4
520.72 S.F.
S/W
..38
197.87
Westwood Hts. 2
*Return on Dogwood St.
- 0 - S.Y.
D/W
18.11
- 0 -
621.70
50% on side
DOGWOOD ST.
INTERSECTION
6.
Daniel M. Wilson et ux S
130.18 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
2.38
309.83
3651 Starlite Ln. F
*24.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
114.00
Lot 27, Blk. 3
520.72 S.F.
S/W
.38
197.87
Westwood Hts.Unit 2
- 0 - S.Y.
D/W
18.11
- 0 -
621.70
*Return on Dogwood St.
502 on side
78410
7.
Jackson 0. Riney `S
130.18 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
2.38
309.83
10746 Glenwood F
*724.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
114.00
Lot 1, Blk. 3
520.72.S.F.
S/W
.38
197.87
Westwood Hts. Unit 2
- 0 - S.Y.
D/W
18.11
- 0 -
621.70 '
*Return on Glenwood St.
507 on side
78410
GLENWOOD ST.
INTERSECTION
8.
Bobby Ray Bentley 8
130.18 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
2.38
309.83
10745 Glenwood St. F
* 24.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
114.00
Lot 15, Blk. 2
520.72 S.F.
S/W
.38
197.87
Westwood Hts. 2
- 0 - S.F.
D/W
18.11
- 0 -
621.70 '
*Return on Glenwood St.
509 on side
78410
Peke
ITEM
NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
9.
Billy W. Landers S
130.18 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
2.38
309.83
P. 0. Boa 10151 F
* 24.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
114.00
Lot 1, Blk. 2 78410
520.72 S.F.
S/W
.38
197.87
Westwood Hts. 2
- 0 - S.Y.
D/W
18.11
- 0 -
621.70
*Return on Rockwood St.
50% on side
ROCKWOOD ST.
INTERSECTION
10.
Francis Dean Morrie S
130.22 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
2.38
309.92
P. 0. Box 10367 F
* 24.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
114.00
Lot 1, Blk. 1 78410
520.88 S.F.
S/W
.38
197.93
Westwood Hts. 2
- 0 - S.Y.
D/W
18.11
- 0 -
621.85
*Return on Rockwood
50% on side
11.
Eugene E. Pavlicek S
137.50 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
2109
287.39
10750 Westwood 78410 F
* 17.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
80.75
Lot 1, Blk. 1
550.00 S.F.
81W
.33
181.50
Westwood Hts. 1
- 0 - S.Y.
D/W
18.11
- 0 -
*Return on Westwood
549.63 '
447 on side
STWOOD DRIVE,
INTERSECTION
12•
W. R.' Biersenwale S
137.50 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
2.09
287,38
10749 Westwood 78410 F
* 17.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
80.75
Lot 1, Blk. 2
550.00 S.F.
S/W
.33
181.50
Westwood Hts. 1
- 0 - S.Y.
D/W
18.11
- 0 -
549.63
*Return on Westwood
447 on side
0 Page
ITEM
NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
13.
Donald R. Kopecky S7
137.50 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
2.09
287.38
10750 Kingwood 78410 F
* 21.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
99.75
Lot 39, Blk. 2
550.00 S.F.
S/W
.33
181.50
Westwood Hts. 1
- 0 - S.Y.
D/W
18.11
- 0 -
*Return on Kingswood
568:63
44% on aide
GWOOD DRIVE
INTERSECTION
14.
Milburn F. Walker S
137.50 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
2/09
287.38
10749 Kingwood 78410 F
* 21.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
99.75
Lot 1, Blk. 3
550.00 S.F.
S/W
.33
181.50
Westwood Rts. 1
- 0 - S.Y.
D/W
18.11
- 0 -
*Return on Kingwood
568.63.
44% on side
15-.
Melvin Adair F
200.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
10.31
2,062.00
4002 Starlite Ln.
792.00 S.F.
S/W 4.5'
.75
594.00
Lot 60 78410
26.34 S.Y.
D/W 3 -12t-
18.11
477.02
Nueces Gardens 2
*Reduced by C.A.
*2,021.02.
16.
Kenneth S. Jernigan F
200.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
10.31
2,062.00
Rt. 1. Box 85 78380
846.00 S.F.
S/W
.75
634.50
Robstown, Tx.
8.78 S.Y.
D/W 1 -12'
18.11
159.01
Lot 61
_
Nueces Garden 2
*1,743.51
*Reduced by C.A.
17.
E. R. Michael F
21+.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
10.31
2,206.34
3922 Starlite Ln.
.75
634.50
Lot 62C 78410
846.00 S.F.
S/w
18.11
159.01
Nueces Gardens 2
8.78 S.Y.
D/W 1 -12'
2,999.85
*Reduced by C.A.
*1,018.76
• Page
ITEM
NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
SUNNY DRIVE
QTTERSECPION
18.
Jessie L. Kimmel
10.00 L.F.
C.G.S Pvmt.
4.75
47.50
3918 Starlite Land
14.00 L.F.
C.G.S Pvmt.
2.38
33.32
Lot 63A 78410
- 0 - S.F.
S/W
.75
- 0 -
Nueces Gardens 2
- 0 - S.Y.
D/W
18.11
- 0 -
*Return on Sunny Dr.
80.82
STARL
LANE
END OF STAR=E
LANE
EAST
;IDE
• Page
ITEM
NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
STARLIT
LANE
BEGIrNING
AT LEOP
= TO SUNNY DR.
(WEST
IDE)
19.
The Circle "R" Corp.
147.10 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
10.31
1,516.60
756 Caddo '
391.95 S.F.
S/W
..75
293.96
Corpus- ChrUti, Tx.
39.56 S.Y.
D/W 2 -30'
18.11
•716.43
Lot 10A
2,526.99
Annaville Addn. 1
78412
20.
James Van Blarcom
119.35 L.E.
C.G.& Pvmt.
10.31
1,230.50
4341 Starlite In' 78410
402.08 3.F.
S/W
.75
301.56
Lot IOC
19.78 S.Y.
D/W 1 -30'
18.11
358.22
Annaville Addn. 1
1,890:28
21'.
James A. Vanblarcom
100.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
10.31
1,031.00
4341 Starlite Lane
180.00 S.F.
S/W
,75
135.00
Lot IOD 78410
3.9,.56 S.Y.
D/W 1 -18'
18.11
716.,431'
Annaville Addn. 1
1,882.43,
22.
E.G. Hardin
31.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
10.31
319.61
P.O. Box 8169. 78412
139.50 S.F.
S/W
.75
104.63
Lot 7 & 8 & S. 31' of 9 & 1
- 0 = S.Y.
D/W 1 -18'
18.11
- -
Blk. B
_0
424.24
Annaville Addn. 1
% Betty Hall
3033 padre Island Dr.
23.
M. C. Perez
103.89 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
493.48
4333 Starlite In. 78410
367.56 S.F.
S/W
.75
275.67
Lot A, Blk. E
8.78 S.Y.
D/W 1 -12'
18.11
159.01
928.16
Annaville Addn. 2
Page -7W
ITEM
NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
24.
Adolph C. Conrad
60.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
285.00
4329 Starlite Ln. 78410
200.00 S.F.
S/W
75
150.00
Lot B, Blk. E
7.56 S.Y.
D/W 1 -10'
18.11
136.91
Annaville Addn. 2
571'.91
25.
Burrell Lemon
60.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
285.00
4325 Starlite Lua. 78410
192.00 S.F.
S/W
.75
144.00
Lot C, Blk. E
8.78 S.Y.
D/W 1 -12'
18.11
159.01 -
Annaville Addn. 2
588.01
26.
Charles K.:Brett et ux
60.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
285.00
4321 Starlite Lane
200.00 S.F.
S/W
.75
150.00
Lot D, Blk. G' 78410
7.56 S.Y.
D/W 1 -10'
18.11
136.91
571.91
Annaville Addn. @
27,
J. W. Honeycutt, Sr.
60.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
285.00
% G. M. Baker 78404
200.00 S.F.
S/W
•75
150.00
314 Melrose
7.56 S.Y.
D/W 1 -:10'
18.11
136.91
571.95
Lot E, Blk. E
Annaville Adds. 2
28.
M. A. Sanford
60.00 L.E.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
285.00
-
4313 Starlite Lane
192.00 S.F.
S/W
.75
144.00
Lot F. Blk. E 78410
8,78 S.Y.
D/W 1 -:12'
18.11
159.01
588.01
Annaville Addn. 2
29•
Max E. Morgan
49.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
232.75
430.9 Starlite Ln.
150.00 S.F.
S/W
•75
117.00
N.E. 49 x 150' Lot G
7.56 S.F.
D/W 1-10,
18.11
136.91
486.66
Blk. E, Annaville Addn.2
78410
Page
ITEM
NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
30.
Roy Graham
71.00 S.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
337.25
4305 Starlite Lw-
244:00 S.F.
S/W
• °75
183;00.
S.E. 11' of G & all
7.56 S.Y.
D/W "1=10'
18.11
136.91
Lot H, Blk. E
657.16
Annaville 2 78410
31.
Mr. & Mrs. H. J. Anders
60.00 L.E.
C.G.& Pvmt.-
4.75
285.00
4301 Starlite In.
240.00 S.F.
S/W
.75
180.00
Lot 1, Blk. E
- 0 - S.Y.
D/W 1 -12'
18.11
- 0 -
465.00
Annaville 2 78410
32.
Mr. & Mrs. H. J. Anders
52.48 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
249.28
4301 Starlite Ln.
* 14.00 L.E.
C.G.& Pvmt.
1.66
23.24
Lot J, Blk. E
7.56 S.Y.
D/W 1 -101_
18.11
136.91
Annaville 2
163.92 S.F.
S/W
.75
127.44
536.87
•
*Return on Annaville Rd.
35% on side
78410
VTTJ- . ROAD
INTERSECTION
33.
Oma Weeks
407.23 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
10.31
4,198.54
4249 Starlite In.
* 15.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
10.31
154.65
Lot 21, Blk. D
,778.54 S.F.
S/W 4.5'
.75
1,333.91
Annaville Addn. 2
5.78 S.Y.
D/W 1 -12'
18.11
159:01
3�4bi�
78410
*3,462.46
*Reduced by C.A.
34•
Hipolito Cantu S
175.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
2.38
416.50
10802 Mayfield Dr. F
* 14.50 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
68.88
Lot 21, Blk. 2
652.00 S.F.
S /Sd
.38
247.76
Shady Acres Subd. 78410
8.78 S.Y.
D/W 1 -12'
18.11
159.01
892.15
*Return on Mayfield Dr.
0 Page �-
ITEM
NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
MAYFIELD DR.
INTERSECTION
35.
Quienbie A. Elam S
175.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
2.38
416.50
10801 Mayfield Dr. F
* 14.50 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
4.75
68.88
Lot 21, Blk. 1 78410
620.00 S.F.
S/W
,38
235.60
Shady Acres Subd.
15.12 S.Y-
D/W 2 -10v
18.11
273.82
*Return on Mayfield Dr.
994.80
36.
W. J. Miller
200.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
10.31
2,062.00
4137 Starlite Lu. 78410
792.00 S.F.
S/W 4.5'
.75
594.00
Lot 50
16.34 S.Y.
D/W 1•-10' &
18.11
295, 9.2
Nueces Gardens 2
1 -12'
-
*ftduced by C.A.
*1,839.92
37.
J. P. Benkendorfer
200.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
10.31
2,062.00
4117 Starlite Ln.
792.00 S.F.
S/W
.75
594.00
Lot 49 78410
16.34 S.Y.
D/W 1 -10' &
18.11
295.92
Nueces Garden 2
1 -12'
*1;839.92
*Reduced by C.A.
38•
J. P. Satchitt
200.00 :,.F
C.G.& Pvmt.
10.31
2,062.00-.
4109 Starlite Ln.
792.00 S.F.
S/W
,75
594.00
Lot 48 78410
17.56 S.Y
D/W 2 -12'
18.11
318.01
Nueces Gardens 2 *Reduced
by C.A.
1,839:92
38a.
Jose L. Cortez
100.00 L.F
C.G. & Pvmt.
10.31
1,031.00
4045 Starlite Ln.
396.00 S.F.
S/W
.75
297.00
Lots 47A & 47B 78410-,-
-- 8.78 S.Y.
D/W 1 -12'
18.11
159.01
-t,48g81
Nueces Gardens 2 *Re
uced by C.A.
* 931:01
C.C. Congregation
39-
of JehovahsIfitnesses.'
135.00 L.F
C.G. & Pvmt.
4.75
641.25
West Unit -
340.00 =1S.F
S/W
,75
255.00
4935 Starlite Ln.
33.44 S.Y
D/W 2 -25'
18.11
605.60
Lot 47B
1,501.85
Nueces Gardens: 78410
• Page 10
IfiEM
NO.
OWNER AND
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
ASSESSED
DESCRIPTION
OF
ASSESSMENT
RATE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
ASSESSED
40.
Lewis W. Williams
235.00 L.E.
C.G.& Pvmt.
10.31
2,422.85
10638 Westwood Dr.
,003.50 S.F.
S/W 4.5'
.75
752.63
Lot 46 78401
$•78 S.Y.
D/W 1 -12'
18.11
159.01
Nueces Gardens 2
*Reduced
-g;9g9
*2,027.09
y C.A.
41.
Henry L. Duecker
170.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
10.31
1,752.70
'% C.P. Spraggins
632.00 S.F.
S/W
.75
533.25
Rt. 1, Box 36, Devine,Ts.
8.78 S.Y.
D/W 1 -12'
18.11
159.01
Nueces Gardens 2 78016
I I; t '45
1,499.76
*Reduced by C.A.
42.
Robert E. Brennan
170.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
10.31
1,752.70
9995 Roundtree Cir.
680.00 S.F.
S/W
.75
573.75
Lot 44 78410
- 0 - S.Y.
D/W
18.11
- 0 -
Nueces Gardens 2
*Reduced by C.A.
1,381.25
43.
Mrs. A.M. Fulton
170.00 L.F.
C.G. & Pvmt.
10.31"
1,752.70
3926 Leopard
* 15.50 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
10.31
159.81
Lot 43
680.00 S.F.
S/W
.75
573.75
Nueces Gardens 2
- 0 - S.Y.
D/W
18.11
- 0 -
1 -26
*Ret. on Sunny Dr.
**Reduced by C.A.
* *1,454.88
SUNNY DRIVE
NTERSECTION
44.
Mrs. .A: M. Fulton
30.00 L.F.
C.G.& Pvmt.
10.31
309.30
3926 Leonard
k 15.50 L.F.
C.g. & Pvmt.
10.31
159.81
N.E. 100' of Lot 42
120.00 S.F.
S/W
.75
- 0__
Nueces Gardens
- 0 - S.Y.
/W
18.11
- 0 -
469:x!
*Return an Sunny Dr.
* *216.13
439, on side
*Reduced by C.A.
PRELIKXARY
AS
ESSMENT
STARLI
E LANE
STARFS
LANE TOTAL
F
$59,047.69
WE
E
I
SECTION 4. Be it further ordained that in the event the actual
frontage of any property herein assessed shall be found upon the completion
of said improvements to be greater or less than the number of feet herein -
above stated, the assessments herein set against any such property and
against the real and true owner or, owners. thereof, shall be, and the same
are hereby declared to be increased or decreased as the case may be, in
the proportion which said excess or deficiency or frontage shall bear to
the whole number of front feet of property actually improved in accordance
with the front foot rule or rate of assessment herein adopted, it being the
intention that such parcel of.property and the real and true owner or owners
thereof abutting on the•portion of the streets above described, within the
limits defined, shall pay for said improvements under the "FRONT 100T RULE
OR PLAN ", which rule or'pIan is :hereby found and determined to be just and"
equitable and to produce a substantial equality, having in view the special,
benefits to be received and the burdens imposed thereby; and it is further
ordained that upon final completion and acceptance of said improvements on
the aforesaid streets, within the limits defined all certificates herein-
after provided for, issued to evidence said assessments against said parcels .
of property abutting upon said street, and, the real and true owner or-owners'
thereof shall be issued in accordance with, and shall evidence the actual
frontage of said property and the actual cost of said improvements, the
amount named in said certificate in no case to exceed the amoaat herein'
assessed against such property -unless such increase be caused by an excess
of front footage over the amount hereinabove stated, such actual cost and-
such actual number of front feet, if different from the hereinabove shown
in Section 3 hereof, to be determined by the Director of Engineering & Physical
Development upon completion of said work on said street, and the findings of
the Director of Engineering & Physical Development shall be final and binding
upon all parties concerned.
SECTION 5. That the several sums mentioned above in Section 3 hereof
assessed against said parcels of property abutting on the aforesaid streets,
within the limits defined, and the real and true owners thereof, whether
named or correctly named herein or not, subject to the provisions of
7
Section 4 thereof, together with interest thereon at the rate of
five and one - quarter (5 1 /470 per annum with reasonable attorney's fee
and all costs and expenses of collection, if incurred, are hereby de-
clared to be made a first and prior lien upon the respective parcels
of property, against which same are assessed from and -after the date
said improvements were ordered by said City.council, to- wit: P7dtch 31,
_ Lg7ti- .and a personal liability and charge g against the real and
true owner or owners be named or correctly named herein, and that
said Lien shall be and constitute the first and prior, enforceable
claim against the property assessed and shall be a first and
Paramount lien superior to all other liens, claims or title, except
for lawful ad valorem 'taxes;'and that the same so assessed shall be
paid and become payable in one of the following methods at the option
` of the property owners
1.
All.in cash within 30 days after completion or acceptance by
City;. or
-. �• Payments to be .made in maximum of 60 equal installments,, the
first of which shall be paid within 30 days after the comple-
tion of said improvement, and the acceptance thereof by the
city, and the balance to,be paid in 59 equal consecutive
monthly installments- cammen_•sng on the lst day of the next
succeeding month and continuing thereafter on the 1st day of
each succeeding month until the entire sum is geld in full,
together with interest from the date of said completion and
acceptance by the City, until paid, at the rate of five and
one -forth percent (5 1/47.) per annum; provided, however, that
the owners of said property availing themselves of Option °21°
or "3" above shall have the privilege of paying one, or all, of
such installments at any time before maturity thereof by Paying
the total am ount of principal due, together with interest accrued,
to the date of payment. .
3. The total number of monthly installments on owner occupied
Property may be extended beyond sixty (60) in number so that,
8
at the owners request, the total monthly payments will not
exceed ten ($10.00) per month. .
SECTION 6. That for the purpose of evidencing said assessments,
the liens securing same and the several sums assessed against the said parcels
of property and the real and true owner or owners thereof and the time and
terms of payment, and to aid in the '
nforcement thereof, assignable certifi-
Bates shall be issued by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas to itself upon
the completion, of said improvements in said streets and acceptance thereof
by said City Council, which certificates shall- be executed by the Mayor in
the name of the City, attested by the City Secretary, with the corporate
seal of said City, and which certificates shall declare the amounts of said
.assessments and the times and terms thereof, the rate of interest thereon,
the date of the completion and acceptance of the improvements for which the
certificate is issued' and shall contain the names of the apparent true
owner or owners as accurately as possible, and the description of the
property assessed by'lot and block number, or front foot thereof, or such
other description as may otherwise identify the same, and if the said pro-
perty shall be owned by an estate or firm, then to so state the fact shall
be,'sufficient and no error or mistake in describing such property or in
giving the name of any owner or owners, or otherwise, shall in anywise
Invalidate or impair the assessment-:levied hereby or the certificate issued
in evidence thereof.
That said certificate shall further provide substantially that
if default shall be made in the payment of any installment of principal or
interest-when due, then at the option of the City, its successors, or assigns,
or the holder thereof, the whole of said assessment evidence thereby shall
at once become due and payable, and shall be collectible with reasonable
attroney's fees and all expenses and costs of collection, if incurred, and
said certificate shall set forth and evidence the personal liability of the
real and true owner or owners of such property, whether named or correctly
named therein or not, and the lien upon such property, and that said lien
is first and paramount thereon, superior to all other liens, titles and
charges, except for lawful ad valorem taxes, from and after the date said
9
Improvements were ordered by said City Council, to -wit: Marth 31, 1976
and shall provide in effect that if defaiift shall be made in the payment
thereof, the same may be enforced, at the option of the City, or their
successors and assigns, by the sale of the property therein described in
the manner provided for the collection of ad valorem taxes as above recited,
or by suit in any Court having jurisdiction.
That said certificates shall further recite in effect that all
the proceedings with reference to making said improvements have been regularly
had in compliance with the law and Charter in fokce in said City and the
proceedings of said City Council of said City, and that all prerequisites
.to the fixing of the; assessment lien against the property therein described,
or attempted to be described, and the personal liability of the real and
true owner or owners thereof, evidence by such certi€icates,'have been
regularly done and performed, which recitals shall be evidence of all the
matters sad facts so recited and no further proof thereof shall be requl ed
in any Court..
That'said certificates shall further provide in 'effect that the
City of Corpus Christi, Texas, shall exercise all of its lawful powers, in
the enforcement and collection thereof, and said certificates may contain
other and further recitals, pertinent and appropriate thereto. It shall
not be necessary that said certificates shall be in the exact form as above'
set forth, but the substance. emd effect thereof shall suffice.
SECTION 7. That all such assessments levied are a personal
liability and charge against the -real and true owner or owners of the pro-
perty described, or attempted to be described, notwithstanding such owner
or owners may not be named or correctly named, and any irregularity in the
Axone of the property owner, or the description of any property or the emount
of any assessment, or in any other matter or thing shall not in anywise.
invalidate or impair any assessment levied hereby or any certificate issued,
and such mistake, or error, invalidity or irregularity whether in such
11 .
10
assessment or in the certificate issued in evidence thereof, may be, but is
not required to be, to be enforceable, at'any time corrected by the said
City Council of the City of Corpus Christi. Further that the omission of
said improvements in front o£ any part or parcel of property abutting upon
the aforementioned streets, which is exempt from the lien of said assess-
meat, shall in no wise affect or impair the validity of assessments against
the other parcels of property abutting upon said street; and that the total
amounts assessed against the respective parcels of property abutting upon
said streets within the limits herein defined and the real and true owner
or'owners thereof, are the same,-as, or less than,the estimate of said
assessment prepared by the Director of Engineering and Physical Development
and approved and adopted by the City Council and are in accordance with the :
proceedings of, said City - Council relative to said improvements and assess-
ments thereof,' and with the terms, powers.and provisions.of said Chapter 106
of the Acts of the First Called Session of the 40th Legislature of the State
of Texas, known as Article 1105b of Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes of
Texas and the Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, under which
terms, powers and provisions said proceedings, said improvements and assess-
ments were had and made by said City Council.'
SECTION 8. The fact that the above - described streets have become
Important thoroughfares and the fact that the present condition of said
streets, within the limits defined, are dangerous to the health and public
welfare of the inhabitants thereof creates a public emergency and an
imperative public necessity, requiring the suspension of the Charter rule
that no ordinance or resolution shall be passed finally on the. date of its
introduction, and that said ordinance shall be read at three several meetings
of the *City Council, and the Mayor having declared that such emergency and
necessity exists, and having requested that said Charter rule be suspended,
and that this ordinance be passed finally on the date of its introduction
-11-
and take effect and be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
IT IS ACCORDINGLY SO ORDAINED, this the ay of O
ATTEST:.
/l L�Zn -A `Z�l a sQiln .�Oir��
City Secretary MAYOR
/ THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
APP VED:
DAY OF
-City Attorney
r
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
DAY OF
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE OF THE FOREGOING
ORDINANCE, A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND IMPERATIVE NECESSITY EXIST FOR THE SUSPEN-
SION OF THE CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT THAT NO ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL
BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED, AND THAT SUCH ORDINANCE OR
RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL; 1, THEREFORE,
REQUEST THAT YOU SUSPEND SAID CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT AND PASS THIS ORDI-
NANCE FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED, OR AT THE PRESENT MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL.
RESPECTFULLY,
(2, - — �"J�
MAYOR
THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
THE CHARTER RULE WAS SUSPENDED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
JASON LuBY
DR. BILL TIPTON
EDUARDO DE ASES
RUTH GILL
BOB GULLEY
GAGE LOZANO, SR.
EDWARD L. SAMPLE
THE ABOVE ORDINANCE WAS PASSED BY
JASON LueY
DR. BILL TIPTON
EDUARDO DE ASES
RUTH GILL
BOB GULLEY
GABE LOZANO, SR.
EDWARD L. SAMPLE