Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout13523 ORD - 12/15/1976-XH:hb:12 /7/76 ' AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION FOR RENEWAL OF THE NUECES COUNTY ORGANIZED CRIME CONTROL UNIT, AS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AND SET FORTH IN THE GRANT APPLICATION, A SUBSTANTIAL COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO, MARKED EXHIBIT "A" AND MADE A PART HEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS TO CONTINUE THE PROGRAM IF AND WHEN APPROVED, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That authorization is hereby given for submission of a grant application to the Criminal Justice Division for renewal of the Nueces County Organized Crime Control Unit, all as more fully described and set forth in the grant application, a substantial copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, marked Exhibit "A ". SECTION 2. That the City Manager be and he is hereby authorized to execute all documents necessary to continue the program if and when the grant application is approved. SECTION 3. The necessity to authorize submission of the afore- said grant application and to execute all necessary documents in order to continue the program if and when approval is granted creates a public emer- gency and an imperative public necessity requiring the suspension of the Charter rule that no ordinance or resolution shall be passed finally on the date of its introduction but that such ordinance or resolution shall be read at three several meetings of the City Council, and the Mayor having declared such emergency and necessity to exist, and having requested the suspension of the Charter rule and that this ordinance be passed finally on the date of its introducitn and take effect and be in full force and effect from and after its passage, IT IS ACCORDINGLY SO ORDAINED, this theAl— day of December, 1976. ATTEST: Af C y Secretary DfAYO THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS APPROVED: 15th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1976: J. BRUCE AYCOCK, CITY ATTORNEY MI�ROFICMED i�6UN 3 Q 1980 By r Assistant City Attorney OF 13523 OMB App,".l N.. 29 -R021a .hdasn3.d D7 GSA, isdaY.t J1s »Dn.+ni Ciesa:.r ]l -T ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary Asst. City Attorney FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 2. APPLI' ,• NUMDER 1. STATE •• NUM9EA CANT'S APPII• 4614 APPLICA• 71071 IDENTI- 1. Of ❑ PREAPPLICATION !. DATE pp th day 0. DATE Y<ar rroalh day ACTION L55 APPtICATIOIJ uTlon 19 �Dr 12 H FI -R ASSIGNED 19 e.. l, I)T.rk.r [] NOTIFICATION OF INTENT (OPL) r.T_" ❑ REPORT OF FEDERAL ACTION 211-k 1. LEGAL APPLICANT /RECIPIENT S. FEDERAL EMPLOYER IOENTIFICATION NO. 0. xm.oat Name : City of Corpus Christi ' b. 0123aintimunit Nueces County Organized Crime ControlUni C. s..vP P. 0. Box 9277 D.o. a a7 PR. PR NUMBER I I • b. TInE Corpus Christi .. ua." Nueces GRAM a. v4 ; r Sab Texas It. 21P rd.: 78408 1P..a. F<dne{ L CPA:AA Tor,. rv.w W. C. Banner, Acting Chief of Police k trl<D1... N..) : 884 -3811 Ext. 11 9 7. TITLE AND DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT'S PROJECT 0. TYPE OF APPLICANT /RECIPIENT Nueces County Organized Crime Control Unit A -Stab H -C-Ai" Attic. Altaq 11- 1.1 -tal. F -Nlthn Edytatnnal 1.51a.1ien _ CrS.babts J- I'd,.. Tnbt Di,tri.t K-OVW Lsi" it): " The Unit will produce and maintain intelligence data E.-Qty on organized crime activity. This information will C-Soec- i °Put be utilized to reduce organized crime offenses in Dhen <t S1Ier eDJNeDr,2d rate.© D. TYPE OF ASSISTANCE Nueces County and to aid other areas in the reduction of organized crime. A,!W+kC -1 D- TnTet,.<a 5Sv)P mentel 61" E -0aq Z.1" epvy C-W. Isttn(s) F.int. 10. AREA 01 PROJECT IMPACT IN.w<. .) e,aiµ en..ti.., 31. ESTIMATED NUM• 32. TYPE OF APPLICATION SWes, st<.1 BER OF PERSONS "_ C•2-0. E- Ai.S-.Wiaa Nueces County, Texas BENEFITING 237,544 Mh wen Nss,rat D- Q.tibti Eet.s eDDnDrisb lNer. -Q I2. PROPOSED FUNDING 31. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF. � li TYPE OF CHANGE IT., 11. r 1L) ' A- icereaw Da R- "Cho (S7eeiiy): e. FEDEt1Al S 64,229 ,tb s. APPLICAR ►. 1,901ECT a- Decr.." DW:lrs ! A7n1tW .DO 14 14 o- K : o-1 n/a 1- E- C+°ratlatron c STATE f .00 16. PROJECT START r 17. PROJECT VAT E Y..r Heath day DURATION I ( Net-aD,ro- I� d. LDCJ1. .00 19 77 3 1 12 Months ( 7+*i.t. tetr<rd) 1 . OTHER 00 la. ESTIMATED DATE TO Yr.r month day 19. EXISTING FEDERAL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER I-ED TO FEDERAL AGENCY > 19 6 12 15 7 L Tmu : 71 366 .I10 23. FEDERAL AGENCY 'To RECEIVE REQUEST (Non., City. Stat<, ZIP ..4) 21. HEM JVtKS ADDED Criminal Justice Division. Office of the Governor. Austin. ❑ Y•• ❑ No 22. e. T. he ►rH .1 .N 1, AW •and "i.l, b. It r"."A by DMa Cinylsr A-95 Ian aP]I.utm......►milled, "-.at 1. 1a• N. r.- Rnp.a.r us Art-aed: 3G o dab M OIU Mw)pwGwrNSlital�N are sItud,awn thw.i., to splawXlab dtssnalhP.a<a end all $09 -A+•• ay.- eltarArd IT" ..d ewn.t, the dow-1 has brM STHE _ APPLICANT ddl Wb ilel b, the is.smint boy •I �) Coastal ❑ al Bend Council of Governments CERTIFIES a4 spoksal sad IA* sP01 -1 rill w Pil it the .s.;a- FI�--11 0 ❑ THATy ww% W tt". et ess,a .rr San :..Pr...a. 0 (3) ❑ ❑ & 23. s- T7PE0 NAME AND 7171E !. StWtAIUltE s, DATE SIGNED Y<•' ­a d°y CERmm� R. Marvin Townsend 19 rtsENTATIve City Manager 21. AZENCY NAME 2A APPLICA• Y.- R..% for TION RECEIVED 19 23. ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT 27. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE M 1 ENS iICATIOMCATION S0. FEDERAL GRANT ?J. ADDRESS IDEHTIFICATIO.i 11. ACTION TAKEN 32. FUNDING r- .a.Rth day STARTING 2'"r sn..14 day .. FiOERAL S JDO C3 A. AWA2DED 37. ACTION DATE Y 39 DATE 19 ►. "PLICANT .W 39. CONTACT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMA- TION (N..., ..d W.Ph.... ­b") 34S. Y-, ENDING ❑ b. REIECFED e. STAR J]O ❑ C tEIUARED FOR DATE 19 d LPL 37. REMARKS ADDED Aa1ENOylJ(T ., WHEN ❑ Z DEFERRED - tt ❑ .. WITNOAAWti [) Ned ❑NO 1. TOTAL S .DO 3y .. 1. uzz .I-, d-. Aar _h r-,.d I,- d naah..n.a r.r. w• b. fEOERAA AGENCY A-95 OFFICIAL Yda, N. II .a.^.r r.apwY u 1...M+r prs»a.eas .1 P.n 1. OM3 C-41 A-95. IN.... e.d lr(epAanr aw.) FEDERAL AGENCY N A.a h..A r n a+.,( •••.s. AaS ACTION .hdasn3.d D7 GSA, isdaY.t J1s »Dn.+ni Ciesa:.r ]l -T ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary Asst. City Attorney Page 1 Criminal Justice Division. Office of the Governor f� " AP1'1.ICA'I'101� 1.02 Glt ANT 2,. Program No. Under Which Funding Expected: 1. Applicant Agency or Institution: -• 77 -B4 City of Corpus Christi 3. Type of Application: (Check one) P. 0. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78408 original Revision Continuation_ If continued or revised give number of all grants. , AC-72-G2-1204 ..AC-3-G2-2068, AC -75 -B4 -2849, AC -76 -B4 -3582 4: Short Title of Project: (Do not exceed one typed line) Nueces County Organized Crime Control Unit 5. Project Director' 6. Financial Officer: ` (Name, title, address, telephone) (Name, title, address, telephone) Ha rold F. Zick, Director of Finance W. C. BannerUting f of Police 0. Box 9277 P. 0. Box 90P. Corpus Christi, Texas 78408 Corpus Chris408 512- 884 -3011 512 - 884 -3811 Signature Signature 7. Period of Present Request: S. Project Duration: From 3 =1 -77 From 11-1-72 2 -28 -78 Through 2-28 -79 ' Through ' TnIA lennlh _` 76�_.__ months Request for Present Year or Period: Total CJD Support Sought: - (Total for project, federal and state) g 426,720 S 71,366 9. Official Authorized to Sign Application: 10. Federal Support: ' (Name, title, address, telephone) R. Marvin Townsend, City Manager 1till ether federal support beavailable for any part of this P. 0. Box 9277 project? Corpus Christi, Texas 78408 —Ye5 X �° 512 -884 -3011 If yes, identify and ..plain: . 11. Attachments (check if included): ' X c Contracts for services, equipment, and (a) Clearinghouse rerirw and ( ) Name of cicarinphnuuo constructions Coastal ems- • council of Governments (d) Letters of endorsement (b) Local gorerning bndy resolution X - e ,pL. t]esciit�e) X () authorizing application I rave I n I 1 ci es , City 0f CJD USE ONLY 12. Irate: 11 -24 -76 Grant Number Geographic Area: _ x.gian mmt Date Received C Y(s ) 13. Total Pages in Application: 28 Program Area - City Form CJD-1 (117!7.1) Page 2 Criminal Justice Division OISce'of the Governor tia APPLICATION FOR GRANT Project Title: Period of Present Request: Nueces County Organized Crime Control Unit From 3_1_77 Through-2-28-78 I. PRESENT PROJECT BUDGET Budget Category CJD Support SUBSEQUE, TPERIOD- CJD Support Cash Contribution CJD Sullport Federal Cash Cash *In -Kind Budget Category and State Contribution Total Contribution A. Personnel C. Travel 3,149 B. Professional & Contract Services 675 D. Equipment E. Construction 6 C. Travel 3149 F. Supplies ,%. Direct Operating Expense G: Indirect Cost 3,149 H. Total $73,872 300 D. Equipment E. Construction 1.20L F. Supplies & Direct Operating Expense 27,108 97 108 G. Indirect Cost 71,366 $71,366 $107,076 H. Total CONTINUATION FUNDING PLAN ANTICIPATED PitJJ'r,C r E\PENDiTURES_ Budget Category SUBSEQUENT PERIOD -6 SUBSEQUE, TPERIOD- CJD Support Cash Contribution CJD Sullport Cash Contribution A. Personnel 42,940 B. Professional Services 675 C. Travel 3,149 D. Equipment E. Construction F. Supplies ,%. Direct Operating Expense G: Indirect Cost 27 108 H. Total $73,872 11I. Explanation of grantee cash contribution, in -kind contribution, and continuation funding plain. Describe (1) nature, (2) source, and (3) project utilization of the grantee contribution for the present project period as listed in the grantee contribution column of Page 2 of this application. Following this should bean explanation in the teen., deticnbed above (nature, source, and project•utilization), of how the applicant proposes to support the project after CJD funding has concluded (attach continuation pages is needed). NOTE: Initial funding by the CJD does not automatically qualify the project for continuation funding. *This category is for information purposes only. Total for each category must be supported by Detail Budget Narrative. Fomi=•1 (111174) Page 3 Office of the Governor irl�, Criminal Justice Division APPLICATION FOR GRANT BUDGET NARRATIVE Begin below and add as many continuation pages (3a, 3b, etc.) as may be needed to explain each item of the project budget. Limit this narrative to an explanation of the basis for arriving at -the cost of each item including grantee contribution items. This section must also describe the applicant's procurement procedures for equipment, services, and construction, if such items are a part of the project budget. A. Personnel - the salaries of the personnel are based on their annual'•salary rates plus longevity compensation and incentive pay where applicable as prescribed by their respective agencies. The increase in personnel costs is due to across -the: board pay raises. In addition, the City of Corpus Christi will continue to pay one - half -the cost of reclassification of the secretary, and one -half of this cost will be paid by the Criminal Justice Division. One -half the cost of the increase equals $318.00. 1. Annual salary rates and percentage of time devoted to project t Position Percentage CJD Support Grantze Contribution Lieutenant 100% $15,433 ^_ Sergeant 100% 14,541 Sergeant 100% 14,170 Sergeant 100% 14,037 Patrolman 100% 12,228 " Deputy Sheriff 100% 12,705 Deputy Sheriff 100% $11,024 Analyst 100% 15,456 Secretary 100% 8,412 318 Assistant District Attorney Variable 6,000 2.' FICA, Retirement, Workmen's Compensation, Group Insurance a. FICA (5.85% of salaries) 2,042 5,232 b. Retirement (7% of salaries) 2,443 6,261 c. Workmen's Compensation (4% of officers' salaries) 441- 3,325 d. Group Insurance ($208 per person per year) 616 1,326 4 , 3 105,576 Fonn CJD -1 (111/74) Page 3A 3. function of Unit members a. The police lieutenant will act as supervisor of the Unit. b. The three police sergeants, the two deputy sheriffs, and the patrolman will conduct investigations pertaining to organized crime activity. c. The analyst will collect, collate, and analyze organized crime information. d. The secretary will serve as the stenographer for the Organized Crime Control Council and will type and file information, take and transcribe dictation, and prepare data cards on organized criminals. B. Professional services An evaluation of the Unit will be made at the end of the project period by an outside evaluator. It is estimated that the evaluation will take five days to accomplish and that the fee for the services of the evaluation specialist will be approximately, but not more than, $135.00 per day. $135.00 X 5 days = $675.00. C. Travel 1. Two members of the Unit will attend the five -day National LEIUA Conference to be held in Reno, Nevada. They will be reimbursed for tourist class air transporta- tion of $325.00 per person plus actual costs, estimated to be $35.00 per person per diem. $325.00 X 2 persons = $650.00; $35.00 X 2 persons X 5 days = $350.00;. for a total of $1,000.00. 2. Two members of the Unit will attend the three -day Texas LEIUA Conference to be held in Brownsville, Texas. They will travel by private automobile and will be reimbursed at the rate of 15¢ per mile plus actual costs, estimated to be $35.00 per person per diem. The distance from Corpus Christi to Brownsville and return is 330 miles -. 330 miles X 15¢ = $49.50; $35.00 X 2 persons X 3 days = $210.00; for a total of $259.50. 3. Two members of the Unit will attend the four -day Texas Narcotics Association Conference in Brownsville, Texas. They will travel by private automobile and will be reimbursed at the rate of 15¢ per mile plus actual costs, estimated to be $35.00 per person per diem. The distance from Corpus Christi to Brownsville and return is 330 miles. 330 miles X 15¢ = $49.50; $35.00 X 2 persons X 4 days = $280.00; for a total of $329.50. 4. It is estimated that members of the Unit, using private automobiles, will make 12 out -of- county trips during the project period at an average of 400 miles per trip to conduct organized crime investigations and to attend TLEIUA quarterly business meetings. They will be reimbursed at the rate of 15¢ per mile plus actual costs, estimated to be $35.00 per person per diem. 400 miles X 12 trips X 15¢ per mile = $720.00; $35.00 X 24 days (12 trips of 2 days each) = $840.00; for a total of $1,560.00. ; D. Equipment and other capital assets Grantee contribution of $300.00 for equipment costs unallowable under Criminal Jus- tice Division funding E. Construction None AttacnmenL i 1) I , •�• [� CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI STANDARD INSTRUCTIONS SUBJECT: Travel Policies DISTRIBUTION: "B" 'V[T ,1:' my 24, 197.5 APPROVED: R. Marvin Townsend City-Manager I. Purpose • Travel by City employees at City expense is for the purpose of training, exchange of new ideas, accomplishment of a specific purpose, or solution of a_definite problem. Each employee is expected to bring credit to the City and to carry out the purpose of his trip in an effective and econom- ical manner. The City reimburses its employees for all reasonable expenses which are incurred while traveling on City business. There is no-attempt on the part of the City to compensate the traveler for incon- • venience or to provide unnecessary conveniences while traveling at City expense. II. Scope This Standard Instruction is applicable to all City travel outside of the City limits involving reimbursable expenses which are to be charged to Code 352, Travel; Code 353, Operational Travel; travel under appropri- ation in various federal, state, or bond fund projects; or any other financial source. III. Procedures A. Under Code 352, Travel prior budgetary a proval Is required. If an advance is requested, the original and 2 copies of Standard Form 33 must be submitted to the Accounting Division which will check the request against a master list of approved travel furnished it by the Budget Office. If the request appears on the master list of approved travel, the Accounting Division will return the original copy along with the advance check to the individual who is traveling. Upon com- pletion of the trip, the original Standard Form 33 will be completed and returned to the Accounting Division with the necessary expense information and receipts attached thereto. If the request is not on the master list of approved travel, the Accounting Division will return the request to the department concerned for proper processing. * Indicates revision or addition 12 -2 -2 Attachment I (continuation page 2) If approval was not obtained in the printed budget, the original and 2 copies of Standard Form 33 must be submitted to the City Manager's Office through the Budget Office. The request must show what trip is being canceled to provide funds for the additional trip. If the request is in addition to that which is approved in the budget rather than a substitution, sufficient justification must be given so that a determination can be made as to the advis- ability of a special appropriation transfer -for the requested purpose. C. If no advance was obtained, the original copy of Standard Form 33 should be completed with the necessary receipts attached thereto and sent to the Accounting Division which will check-the request against the master list of approved travel. If the travel is an addition or substitution, then the request must be submitted to the City Manager's Office through the Budget Office for approval: The . Standard Form 33 and attached receipts will then be sent to the Accounting Division for reimbursement. D. Operational travel will not require prior approval as long as each individual trip is approved by the department head, the division head, or the supervisor having primary responsibility for the parti- cular activity. If advances are requested, the some procedures will be carried out as under Code 352, Travel. Upon return of the traveler, the original of Standard Form 33 must be sent to the Accounting Division with the necessary expense receipts to support the requested reimbursement. IV. Reimbursable Expenditures A. To provide proper management and accounting control, definite standards must be established to determine the amount of each item and the basic items that are eligible for reimbursement. The representative of.the City is responsible for justifying his expenses adequately and fully to the satisfaction of the Chief Accountant within the following limits 1. Transportation - Tourist Class air travel will be utilized by division heads, department heads and other staff and employees'for all long trips. First Class transportation may, be utilized only with prior approval of the City Manager, unless Tourist Class seats are not available. Reimbursement for private cars for short trips will be made on a basis of a rate not to exceed $.15 per mile, depending upon the policy of the division concerned. When City cars are used for short trips, the City credit card may be ob- tained from the Purchasing Agent. The wives of City officials may accompany their husbands on a short trip when tbg__Qjt`LQAL is used upon approval of the City Manager; however, the City will not pay for the cost of air fare for the wife of a City official to accompany him on longer trips. * Indicates revision or addition _ Attachment I (continuation page 3) 12 -2 -3 2. Meals - Expenses for meals will be reimbursed on an actual basis as certified up to the following limits: �2�25 for breakfast, $2.75 for lunc, r and 3.50 for dinner. For banquets and special meals which exceed these limits, receipts or a written explanation of any higher prices which were necessary must be provided. 3. Lodging - Reimbursements for room expenses shall be based on actual receipts showing the amounts paid. When the room is shared by several individuals, the direct percentage of the room bill shall be-reimbursed, i.e., if two individuals share the room, a reimbursement of 502 will accrue to each individual. Lodging for wives may be included upon approval of the City Manager. 4. Registration - Registration reimbursement shall be based upon the actual receipt for the registration payment. Reimbursement may include registration for wives upon approval of the City Manager. 5. Tips - The reimbursement for tips shall be based upon actual expenditures as certified by the traveler, but will not exceed 102 o f the cost of meals plus $.50 per day. 6. Phone calls and telegrams - Phone calls and telegrams will be reimbursed only when itemized individually by purpose and certi- fied by the traveler. Personal calls to the traveler's home of minimum time and not in excess of one per day are reimbursable. 7. Car Storage and Parking - Receipts for car storage and parking plus up to $.25 per day as certified by the traveler will be reimbursable. If receipts are not available, parking costs in excess of $.25 must be itemized by City, time and purpose. 8. Car Rental - Car rental will be authorized only when the travel- er's appointment schedule precludes the use of taxis. When the necessity for car rental is foreseeable, the traveler must obtain a car rental credit card from the Purchasing Agent. The use of the credit card identifies the traveler as on City business and assures elimination of the sales tax and also obtains any business discount offered by the car rental agency. Only the lowest price car available is to be rented. Since adequate insurance coverage is included in the car rental price, the City will not reimburse the traveler for any additional insurance coverage. For unforeseeable car rental, the traveler will rent at the lowest cost available at the location where the car is to be rented. 9. Laundry - Not more than $1.00 per day as certified by the traveler will be allowed for laundry expenses_ Reimbursement for laundry will only be provided for trips in excess of five days. * Indicates revision or addition Attachment I. (continuation page 4) 10. Paris and Limousines - Expenditures for taxi and limousine purposes will be reimbursed as certified by 'the traveler except that all expenses over $1.00 per day must he i enized from location to location on a trip basis. 11. Insurance - Cost for flight and other travel insurance will be allowed up to x$1.00 per trip. 12. Other'expenditures - All other expenses must be itemized and supported by receipts in order to be reimbursed. Travel reports containing such other expenditures will require the approval of the City Manager or the Assistant City :tanager. V. General Policies A. All individuals traveling from'the City should leave word at their office with their supervisors as to where they can be reached while out of the City. A. When vacation or any other type of absence is taken in addition to the travel time. the exact hours of estimated leave time must be clearly shown on Standard Form 33. C. For travel over eight hours only plane fare will be approved. It is the City's policy that planes be used when possible to eliminate the lost time which is otherwise involved. Lodging will not be approved for automobile trans ootation in excess of one day unless the travel is on the traveler s time and only then for the duration of the conference or meeting being attended. D. Alternate routes which are desirable because of the personal affairs of the traveler can be used, but only on the traveler's time and with the traveler bearing the additional cost of the alternate route. E. It is expected that minimum, but sufficient advances, will be drawn by those who are traveling for the City. F. The careful notation of the expenses in writing-when they are incurred will be of valuable assistance in preparing the final expense report. All requests for advances on approved travel will be submitted to Accounting at least three days prior to departure, except on emergency travel. C. Those persons who travel regularly to carry out their duties should ' complete a reimbursement form once each month for the expenses they have incurred during the previous month. All such travel is budgeted in Code 353 and reimbursement should be requested upon Standard Form 33. Il. `All expenditures reports must be filed with the Accounting Division ' ,within 15 days after the traveler's return. Attachment I (continuation page 5) 1. A written report to the City Hanager through the department head concerned is required for all travel under Code 352 and final settlement of advances or payment for expenses will not be made until such report is furnished. A copy of this report must accom- pany the reimbursement request. The primary value of the report is to provide a definite opportunity for the individual to think through the accomplishments and values received from his City sponsored trip. Page 3B F. Supplies and other operating expenses I. Vehicle operating expenses, actual documented cost on 7 vehicles, estimated to be $11,760.00 2. Cassette tapes, reel tapes, and batteries for tape recorders, actual docu- mented cost, estimated to be $450.00 3. Office supplies, actual documented cost, estimated to be $500.00 4. Postage, actual documented cost, estimated to be $75.00 _ 5. Telephone pager.service, actual documented cost, estimated to be $33.00 per pager per month. $33.00 X 12 months X 8 pagers = $3,168.00 6. Texas Wide Area Telecommunications Service (WATS) line, actual documented cost, estimated to be $3,120.00 7. Out -of -state telephone calls, actual documented cost, estimated to be $660.00 8. Equipment maintenance, actual documented cost, estimated to be $600.00 9. Registration for meetings and conferences, actual documented cost, estimated to be the following: National LEIUA registration for 2 members at $35.00 per person $70.00 Texas LEIUA registration for 2 members at $25.00 per person 50.00 Texas Narcotics Association Conference for 2 members at $30.00 per person 60.00 for a total estimated cost of $180.00 10. LEIUA membership dues, actual documented cost, estimated to be $45.00 11. Film and film processing, actual documented cost, estimated to be $500.00 12. Surveillance funds to be used to rent hotel rooms, motel rooms, apartments, or specially equipped vehicles to conduct undercover operations during in- vestigations of organized crime activity. These funds will be secured and disbursed in accordance with guidelines furnished by LEAA and the Criminal Justice Division. Expenditures in this category are estimated to be $13550.00 13. Imprest 'Fund, actual documented cost, to be used to purchase information and evidence which is not available from any other source. These funds will be secured and disbursed in accordance with guidelines furnished by LEAA and the Criminal Justice Division. Expenditures in this category are estimated to be $4,500.00 14. Grantee contribution of $1,200.00 for rental of a video terminal for sole use by the Nueces County Organized Crime Control Unit G. Indirect cost In this grant application indirect cost has not been included as an in -kind con- tribution. Should any CJD grant funds be unexpended at the end of the project period, the Grantee will request that, up to the maximum allowable, these funds be transferred to Category G. Page 3C H. Procurement procedures Procurement procedures will be in accordance with the City of Corpus Christi's usual practices and in accordance with all applicable CJD requirements as de- scribed in the Guideline "Manual M610. II. Continuation funding plan Should continuation funding be available for a subsequent period, expenditures are expected to remain basically the same as the present project budget except for an-- ticipated across - the -board raises for personnel. III. Explanation of grantee in -kind contribution and plan for post -CJD funding period A. In -kind contribution 1. Nature: $105,576 2. Source: from budgets of participating agencies 3. Utilization a. $70,409 City of Corpus Christi contribution to pay salaries and $12,905 to pay benefits for one police lieutenant, three police sergeants, and one police patrolman b. $318 City of Corpus Christi contribution to pay one -half the compensation increase and $49 to pay for the proportionate benefits for the secretary c. $18,705 County contribution to pay for the salary of one deputy sheriff and a proportional part of the salary of an assistant district attorney and $3,190 to pay benefits for the deputy sheriff and proportional bene- fits for the assistant district attorney. B. Post -CJD Funding period 1. Nature: cash and in -kind contributions 2. Source: from budgets of participating agencies 3. Utilization: to pay salaries, benefits, and operating costs Page 4 tee °if Criminal Justice Division Office of the Governor /fir Q APPLICATION FOR GRANT Project Plan and Support Data This section constitutes the heart of the grant application. It is the appl'icant's detailed statement of the project —its aims, precisely what will be done, whq will be involved, and what is expected to result. With the project budget, it constitutes primary evidence to CJD of the soundness of the project, the care and planning that has gone into its formulation, and the responsibility and qualifications of the applicant and others who will be involved in carrying it out. This section consists of two parts- the summary and the detailed project description. Summary In the space below, write a brief summary of total prolecr.. A. Goals The.purpose of this project is to reduce the incidence of organized crime offenses in Nueces County and to aid other areas in the reduction of such offenses. through participation in the law enforcement intelligence network. B: Methods The Nueces County Organized Crime Control Unit will produce'and maintain usable intelligence data on organized crime activity. This information will be utilized to reduce organized crime offenses in Nueces County and to aid other areas in the reduction of organized crime. Inquiries will be processed immediately upon recei C. Resources The Grantee will be the City of Corpus Christi. The Chief of Police of the City of Corpus Christi will be the Project Director. The Staff will consists-of membe of the Corpus-Christi Police Department, the Nueces County Sheriff's Office, and' the District Attorney's Office, and civilian employees of the City of-Corpus Christi. The advisory body will be the Organized Crime Control Council. D. Results The incidence of organized crime offenses in Nueces County will be reduced, and other law enforcement agencies will be aided in the reduction of organized crime offenses through the Unit's participation in the law enforcement intelligence network. E. Evaluation The criteria for evaluation will be based on the attainment of or the failure to attain the projected objectives arid results presented in this grant application. Evaluation reports will be submitted to the Criminal Justice Division by the Project Director and by an outside evaluator. Form CJD•1 (1/1174) Page 4A Office of the Governor { ff' Criminal Justice Division APPLiCATION FOR GRANT DETAIL PROJECT DESCRIPTION Organize the remainder of this section under the following headings- A. Goals, B. Methods, C. Resources, D_ Results, and E. Evaluation. ' Insert after this sheet as many additional pages 4a, 4b, 4c, etc.) as may be needed to complete the description of the Project Plan and Supporting Data. If the applicant wishes to append documents that cannot be readily placed on continuation sheets, these documents should be listed on the last page of the PrcjecCPlan and copies furnished with the application for staff review. A. Goals 1. Nature of problems and needs to be met In October, 1975, a noted drug treatment pioneer, visiting Corpus Christi, pre- dicted a devastating epidemic of heroin addiction for Texas.l In Jdne, 1976, the head of the organized crime division of the Texas Attorney General's Office labeled narcotics as the most dramatic criminal epidemic in Texas.2 In August, 1976, the Texas. Attorney General revealed that there was more Mexican heroin passing through Texas than any other state and that this heroin was valued in the hundreds of millions of dollars.3 In that vast macrocosm which is organized crime, narcotics trafficking in Texas, as characterized by the above assessments, represents.a surging, proliferating threat. Locally narcotics trafficking is a representative microcosm of the organized crime system, one which poses a major challenge to organized crime control. Corpus Christi's proximity to the border offers an excellent induce- ment as a place through which criminals can transport heroin and marijuana. A recent and dramatic increase in the smuggling of cocaine has added to -the nar- cotics problems facing the area. It is estimated that at present there are ten to fifteen Class I Narcotics Violators, twenty to thirty Class II Narcotics Violators, seventy -five to one hundred Class III Narcotics Viol- ators, and eight hundred to one thousand Class IV Narcotics Violators in the Corpus Christi area.4 Another viable organized crime problem in the area is illegal gambling, particu- larly bookmaking. It has been estimated that the net profit to racketeers in- volved in illegal betting in -Texas on football alone is $121,000,000.00.5 Cor- pus Christi's involvement in this type of illegal activity is estimated to be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. At least twenty -seven bookmakers have been identified as being active in the Corpus Christi area at the present time. Dr. Judianne Denson - Gerber, as reported in "Devastating Heroin Epidemic Predicted for Area ", by Steve Blow, Corpus Christi Caller, October 5, 1976 2Tim James, as reported in "Mafia in Texas ", Corpus Christi Caller, June -28, 1976 3John L. Hill, as reported in "Texas Is Prime Entry Point for Mexican Drugs ", by Nicholas C. Chriss, Corpus Christi Caller, August 2, 1976 414arcotics violators are divided into four groups. See attachment on the following page for descriptions. 5Tim James, Ibid. ATTACHMENT JI CLASSIFICATION OF NARCOTICS VIOLATORS A Class I Narcotics Violator is a drug offender who sells a kilogram (2.2 pounds) or more of heroin or a thousand or more pounds of mari- juana. A Class II Narcotics Violator is a drug offender who sells heroin in amounts from two ounces up to a kilogram or who bankrolls drug deals. A Class III Narcotics Violator is a drug offender who sells heroin in ounces only and generally in the one- to two -ounce range. A Class IV Narcotics Violator is a drug offender who sells heroin in amounts from one dosage unit to one ounce or who furnishes heroin to others without pay. Almost all addicts fall under this class. x Page 4B The difficulty in making cases on the bookmakers has been that influential citizens participate in the illegal activity and use their financial and po- litical power to protect the bookmakers. A third and possibly the most insidious form of organized crime in the area in that its excellent cover makes detection'difficult - is the infiltration of organized crime into business. Because huge sums of money which act as a corrupting influence upon certain members of the community are involved and because this type of illegal activity threatens the welfare of truly legiti- mate business in the community, we rank this as a pressing organized crime problem. As projected in the previous grant application, the Nueces County Organized Crime Control Unit considers the most effective way to combat the narcotics problem is to concentrate on quality arrests, that is, arrests of suppliers and dealers. The arrest and indictment of major drug figures in the past year has cut deeply into some of the existing narcotics organizations. Con- tinued Criminal Justice Division funding is needed to further the effort toward arrests at the top echelons of the, narcotics hierarchy. Attacking the illegal gambling problem presents a challenge to the Unit to convince citizens that bookmaking tied to organized crime is not a benign, victimless activity but a many - tentacled organism which supports other types of organized crime and which strangles legitimate enterprise. The suppression of illegal gambling needs courageous law enforcement effort at every level of the criminal justice system in the area. Criminal Justice Division funding will enhance the possibility of gathering information and preparing cases on illegal gambling tied to organize crime which can be suc- cessfully prosecuted. To deal with the infiltration of organized crime into business, the Unit must undertake thorough, painstaking investigations. With the help of grant fund- ing the Unit hopesto bring to fruition all of the goals and objectives which exemplify the intent of the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration. 2. Groups affected or benefited by the project The Nueces County Organized Crime Control Unit will benefit all federal, state, and local agencies which must deal with organized crime problems. The Unit - will interact with law enforcement agencies which need assistance in the detec- tion and apprehension of organized crime figures. Additionally, area citizens will benefit from the reduction of organized crime offenses. 3. Goals and objectives a. Goals The primary goal of the Nueces County Organized Crime Control Unit is to reduce the incidence of organized crime offenses in Nueces County through investigation and apprehension of persons involved in organized crime ac- tivity or through inhibition of such activity. The Unit will also par- ticipate in the law enforcement intelligence network and will disseminate data to all law enforcement agencies which exhibit a need to know for law enforcement purposes. r� Page 4C b. Quantified objectives As in the present project grant application, the Unit in this grant ap- plication proposes a quantified objective relating to arrests which is stated in terms of -an anticipated number of quality arrests rather than in terms of a projected percentage increase. A commitment to document both the quantity and the quality of arrests will be part of the evalu- ation design. Thus the objective relating to arrests will be both ex- plicitly quantitative and implicitly qualitative. 1) To effect at least 120 organized crime arrests* and to document type of arrests, number of cases filed, number of indictments -returned, number of convictions obtained, number of cases dismissed, number of cases pending, amount of seizures made, and amount of property re- covered 2) To increase data cards on organized crime subjects by at least 500 3) To contribute at least 100 data cards to the Department of Public Safety Organized Crime Intelligence Division 4) To process 100% of the inquiries received from law enforcement per- sonnel for law enforcement purposes c. Non - quantified objectives 1) To analyze the impact of arrests and convictions on the organized crime structure 2) To maintain cooperation among participating law enforcement agencies of Nueces County and with other law- enforcement personnel 3) To develop new sources of information through contacts made at Law enforcement Intelligence Unit Association conferences 4) To obtain up -to -date information on organized crime control through attendance at conferences and meetings 5) To review and revise information in Unit files on a continuing basis 6) To discuss at staff meetings information regarding court cases which affect law enforcement procedures and practices in organized crime detection and apprehension B. Methods Information gathered by Unit members from other law enforcement officers, from informants, from surveillances, and from other investigations will be collected, *Organized crime arrests in this grant application mean arrests for any of- fenses in which members of organized criminal groups are involved. Although these offenses will often be gambling, illegal drug traffic, prostitution, por- nography, automobile theft, and white collar crime, they may also include any other offenses which are perpetrated by persons known to have ties with organized criminal groups. Page 4D reported, analyzed, and collated. The finished intelligence product will be turned over to the appropriate enforcement unit or agency for action. This in- formation will also be placed in the Unit's files, kept current, and released to law enforcement personnel on a need -to -know basis. Inquiries will be processed as they are received. Significant information will be sent to the Department of Public Safety Organized Crime Intelligence Division. Under the direction of the Project Director and the Unit Commander, the Supervisor of the Unit will super- vise the timetable for achieving the objectives. The investigators will gather and report intelligence information. The analyst will analyze and collate in- telligence information. The secretary will type and file information, take and transcribe dictation, and prepare data•cards on organized criminals. C. Resources I. Qualifications and facilities of grantee The City of Corpus Christi has in the past fully discharged its responsibili- ties to the Nueces County Organized Crime.Control Unit and to all other bene- ficiaries of Criminal Justice Division grant funds under its care. It will continue to provide personnel and facilities for the implementation of the Unit project. 2. Staff and organization a. Project Director, Unit Commander, Supervisor, and other staff members 1) Project Director Acting Chief of Police W. C. Banner received his General Education Development diploma from Del Mar College in 1960. He attended Del Mar College, Sam Houston State University, and the Federal Bureau of In- vestigation National Academy in 1963. He has an extensive background of both general and specialized police training and has approximately 2400 hours of law enforcement education. He holds an Advanced Certif- icate and an Instructor's Certificate from the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Standards and Education. Chief Banner joined the Corpus Christi Police Department in April, 1951. He served as a patrolman from 1951 to 1956, as a sergeant from 1956 to 1962, as a lieutenant from 1962 to 1967, as a captain from 1967 to 1971, as a commander from 1971 to 1976, and as an assistant chief from January, 1976, to July, 1976, at which time he was appointed Acting Chief of Police. 2) Unit Commander Commander K. A. Bung graduated from Walworth High School, Walworth, Wisconsin, in 1956 and obtained an Associate Degree W Law Enforcement from Del Mar College in June, 1973. He is a graduate of the Corpus Christi Police Department Academy and has had extensive training in the field of criminal intelligence and organized crime control. After leav- ing the Navy, he was employed as a patrolman with the Corpus Christi Po- lice Department in August, 1960. After serving as a sergeant he was promoted to lieutenant in 1969 while a member of the Vice Squad. He served one year as supervisor of the Intelligence Unit. He was promoted to captain and selected coordinator of the Nueces County Organized Crime Control Unit in October, 1972. He was promoted to Commander on Page 4E January 12, 1976, and was assigned as Commander to the Special Ser- vices Division. He has been awarded the Advanced Certificate by the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education. 3) Supervisor Lieutenant Henry Garrett graduated from Ray High School, Corpus Christi, Texas, in 1958 and from the Corpus Christi Police Academy in 1963. He was a patrolman with the Corpus Christi Police Department from 1963 to September, 1969, when he was promoted to sergeant. He has served with the Intelligence and Traffic Divisions and as a lieutenant in the Nar- cotics Section of the Corpus Christi Police Department. He has amassed over 1,400 hours of law enforcement education, including training at the Drug Enforcement Administration School in Phoenix, Arizona; the Depart- ment of Public Safety Intelligence School in Austin, Texas; and the Se- cret Service Dignitary Protection School in Washington, D. C. He holds the Advanced Certificate and Instructors Certificate from the Texas Com- mission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education. 4) Investigators a) Sergeant Ernesto Ramirez graduated from Laredo High School, Laredo, Texas, in 1946. He joined the Corpus Christi Police Department in 1959. fie was promoted to sergeant in 1970 while a member of the Tactical Squad. Sergeant Ramirez has also been assigned to the Vice Squad, and prior to his assignment with the Organized Crime Control Unit he served three years with the Intelligence Unit. He has at- tended numerous training schools in law enforcement, including eighty -three hours in organized crime control. He holds the Ad- vanced Certificate from the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Of- ficer Standards and Education. b) Sergeant Pete Z. Rodriguez graduated from Roy Miller High School, Corpus Christi, Texas, in 1961 and from the Corpus Christi Police Academy in 1968. He received his Associate Degree in Law Enforce- ment from Del Mar College in May, 1976. Before being assigned to the Nueces County Organized Crime Control Unit he was a member of the Tactical Squad and a patrolman. He was promoted to sergeant in 1974. He attended the Drug Enforcement Administration National Training Institute in Washington, D. C. in August, 1976, where he was cited for outstanding achievement. He holds the Intermediate Certificate from the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education. c) Sergeant Eugene Estes Kiddy graduated from Corpus Christi High School in 1944. He served eighteen months in the Army. He joined the Corpus Christi Police Department in 1950, working there until 1957. He spent one year with the Texas Liquor Control Board and one year with the Nueces County Sheriff's Office. In 1959 he re- joined the Corpus Christi Police Department. His law enforcement experience includes five years in the Traffic Division, four years in the Vice Squad, and ten years in the Criminal Investigation Di- vision. He was assigned for eighteen months as investigator for . the District Attorney's Office. He has taken numerous law enforce- ment courses at Del Mar College and the University of Oklahoma. He Page 4F was promoted to sergeant in 1969. He holds the Advanced Certifi- cate from the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education. In addition to his work with the Organized Crime Control Unit, he is presently an investigator with the Nueces Coun- ty Medical Examiner's Office. d) Deputy Sheriff Sergeant William L. Burch received his General Edu- cation Development diploma from Del Mar College and graduated from the Polygraph Training School of Texas A &-M University. He is a licensed Polygraph Examiner for the State of Texas. He has amassed approximately 1,400 classroom hours of training in various phases of law enforcement. He began his law enforcement career in 1951 with the Corpus Christi Police Department. He joined the Refugio County Sheriff's Office as an Identification Officer in 1956. He served as Identification Superintendent for the Nueces County Sher- iff's Office from June, 1958, until his transfer into the Nueces County Organized Crime Control Unit. He holds the Advanced and In- structor's Certificate from the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education. In addition to his work with the Organized Crime Control Unit, he is an investigator with the Nueces County Medical Examiner's Office. e) Officer Art Serrano, Jr., attended Burbank High School, San Antonio, Texas. He served in the Army for three years, during which time he received training as a communications specialist. While in the Army he held a top- secret clearance and handled and distributed classi- fied information. He has worked as a commercial photographer and has experience in photo darkroom procedure and lithograph. Officer Serrano joined the Corpus Christi Police Department in August, 1969. He has served.in the Patrol Division and in the Traffic Division as an investigator. f) Another officer from the Nueces County Sheriff's Office will be'as- signed to the Unit for the project period. His biographical sketch will be sent to the Criminal Justice Division as soon as the infor- mation becomes available. 5) Analyst Barbara 0. Lampert graduated from Woodrow Wilson High School, Dallas, Texas, and from the-University of Texas at Austin. She received a Texas teaching certificate from Southern Methodist University and took advanced work in Psychology from Texas A & I - Kingsville. She holds a Master of Science Degree from Texas A & I - Corpus-Christi. 6) Secretary Pauline J. (Polly) Flewelling graduated from Penelope High School, Penelope, Texas, and from Jackson Business School, Lampasas, Texas. She was employed as a secretary by Federal Civil Service at Fort Hood, Texas, from 1944 to 1946; secretary to the Chief of Police, Corpus Christi Police Department, from 1946 to 1949; executive secretary in Houston, Texas, from 1954 to 1957; and from 1957 until her employment with the Nueces County Organized Crime Control Unit in December, 1972, she worked in the dental field as secretary- receptionist - bookkeeper- office manager. Page 4G 7) Assistant District Attorney James Richard Folsom graduated from Salesianum High School, Wilmington, Delaware. He received a Bachelor of Arts Degree in 1965 from St. Mary's University and a J. D. Degree from St. Mary's University School of Law in 1969. He worked for the City of San Antonio as a Prosecutor for nine months beginning January, 1970. He went to the Bexar County District Attorney's Office where he worked until 1973. After being in private practice for six months, he joined the Nueces County District Attorney's Office in November, 1973. b. Lines of decision and advisory.body The Organized Crime Control Council, composed of the Chief of Police, the Sheriff, and the District Attorney, will act as the advisory body for the project. The Chief of Police will serve as Chairman of the Council. The Council will meet as necessary to discuss relevant issues pertaining to the implementation of the project objectives. Under the direction of the Project Director and the Unit Commander, the Project Supervisor will be responsible for developing priorities, coordinating activities, utilizing resources, and evaluating project results. 3. Cooperating or participating agencies The Corpus Christi Police Department will furnish the project director, unit commander, supervisor, and four investigators. The Nueces County Sheriff's Office will furnish two investigators. The analyst and secretary are City of Corpus Christi employees. The District Attorney's Office will furnish the Assistant District Attorney. Cooperating agencies will consist of all other law enforcement agencies which wish to work toward accomplishment of the project objectives. D. Results 1. Results related to goals a. A reduction in the incidence of organized crime offenses in Nueces County b. Participation in the law enforcement intelligence network and dissemination of data to all law enforcement agencies which exhibit a need to know for law enforcement purposes 2. Results related to quantified objectives a. The effectuation of at least 120 organized crime arrests and the documenta- tion of type of arrests, number of cases filed, number of indictments re- turned, number of convictions obtained, number of cases dismissed, number of cases pending, amount of seizures made, and amount of property recovered b. An increase of data cards on organized crime subjects by at least 500 c. A contribution of at least 100 data cards to the Department of Public Safety Organized Crime Intelligence Division d. The processing of 100% of the inquiries received from law enforcement per- sonnel for law enforcement purposes Page 4H 3. Results related to non - quantified objectives a. An analysis of the impact of arrests and convictions on the organized crime structure b. The maintenance of cooperation among participating law enforcement agencies of Nueces County and with other law enforcement personnel c. The development of new sources of information through contacts made at Law Enforcement Intelligence Unit Association conferences d. The obtainment of up -to -date information on organized crime control through attendance at conferences and meetings e. The review and revision of information in Unit files on a continuing basis f. The discussion at staff meetings of information regarding court cases which affect law enforcement procedures and practices in organized crime detec- tion and apprehension 4. Significance This project offers an experiment which seeks to test whether a coordinated effort by specially- trained members of three law enforcement agencies working together as a Unit can have an impact on the problem of organized crime. It also seeks to test whether a program inaugurated with adequate financial as- sistance from state and federal sources can perpetuate and justify itself after the funding period. Hopefully, the success of the Unit in reducing the incidence of organized crime activity will persuade local government to fund the Unit after the total grant period has ended. 5. Dissemination Results obtained by the Unit will be presented in reports to the Texas Crim- inal Justice Division and to the Organized Crime Control Council. Lessons and findings of particular significance will be shared with other law enforce- ment agency personnel at conferences and meetings. - E. Evaluation 1. Means of presenting evaluation a. Reports to be submitted by the project director 1) Tile project director will submit monthly. progress reports as prescribed by the Criminal Justice Division for organized crime control units under Program 77 -B4. These reports will be submitted prior to the 20th day of the month following the month being reported. 2) At the end of nine.months of grant operation, the project director will submit to the Criminal Justice Division a complete evaluation report as prescribed in paragraph 3, below. This report will be submitted prior to the last day of December, 1977. Page 4I 3) At the end of the grant period the project director will submit to the Criminal Justice Division a complete evaluation report as pre - scribed-in paragraph 3; below. This report will be submitted prior to the last day of March, 1978. b. Report to be submitted by an outside evaluator An outside evaluator will submit an independent evaluation report to the Criminal Justice Division at the end of the grant period as prescribed in paragraph 3, below. The report will be submitted prior to the last day of March, 1978. 2. Criteria The criteria will be based on the attainment of or the failure to attain the projected objectives and results presented in this grant application. 3. Methods for evaluation a. Statistics on current experience and performance as they relate to the ob- jectives in this grant application will be provided by the project director in his reports and by the outside evaluator in his report. The reports will include number and type of arrests made, cases filed, indictments returned, convictions obtained, cases dismissed, cases pending, amount of seizures made, amount of property recovered, number of intelligence leads generated, number of intelligence records collected, and extent of assistance provided to other organized crime units or agencies in the form of intelligence or manpower. Arrest data will be compared to the anticipated number of quality arrests mentioned in Quantitative Objective 1 rather than used to determine percentage increase or decrease over the same period of the preceding year. b. Subjective appraisals will be made in narrative form covering each objec- tive set out in the "Goals" section and eachr result in the "Results" section. 4. Data collection and timing a. Data collection will be on a monthly basis, quarterly basis, or annual basis as available. b. Statistics on current experience and performance as they relate to the ob- jectives in this grant application will be taken from the following: 1) Unit records 2) Police arrest records 3) County records 4) District Attorney's Office records 5) Court docket dispositions 6) Grand Jury reports 7) Federal Clerk's records Page 4J 8) Reports and records from other jurisdictions Office of the Governor Application for Grant Project Title: 5 Criminal Justice Division The following standard grant. conditions, (where applicable), must be certified and agreed to by the applicant in order to validate the application. Also, where a condition is applicable and requires additional information, such information should be included in or as an addition to the application. (Additional explanation of these grant conditions maybe found in CJD publication Guide for Grant Administration) Standard Grant Conditions L Project initiation. Acceptance of the grant award must be returned to the CJD within 30 days after the date of the award. If an approved project has not commenced within 60 days after acceptance of the grant award, the grantee will report by letter the steps taken to initiate the project, reasons for the delay, and expected starting date. If 90 days after acceptance of the award the project is not opera. tional, a further statement of implementation delay will be submitted by the grantee to the Criminal Justice Division. On receipt of the 90-day letter CJD may cancel the project and redistribute the funds to other project areas. CJD, where warranted by extenuating circumstances, may request approval from the LEAA regional office to extend the implementation date of the project past the 90-day period. 2. Project completion. With the exception of the final project report, final financial report, and liquida. tion of goods or services encumbered before the termination date, grants must be completed no later than the termination date set forth In the Statement of Grant Award or any approved extension thereof. Grantees should keep in mind the grant condition prohibiting the obligation of funds beyond such termlliation dates, the requirement for liquidation of obligations within 90 days after the termina. tion date, and the requirement for the return of tinobligated grant funds within such period, 3. Reports. The grantee shall submit, at such times and in such forts as may be prescribed, any reports that the Criminal Justice Division may require, including quarterly financial and progress reports -and final financial and progress reports. The grantee's failure to submit required reports within the prescribed time constraits may result in unnecessary delays in the processing of request for funds. 4. Fiscal regulations. The fiscal administration of grants shall be subject to such rules, regulations, and policies concerning accounting and records, payments of funds, cost allowability, submission of financial reports, etc, as may be presecribed by CJD, including those set forth in the CJD Guide for Grant AdministrafforL 5. Utilization and payment of funds. Funds awarded may be expended only for purposes and activities covered by the grantee's approved project plan and budget. Payments will be made on the basis of periodic requests and estimates of fund needs submitted by the grantee. Payments will be adjusted to correct previous overpayments or underpayments and disallowances resulting from audit. 6. written approval of changes. Grantees must obtain prior written approval from CJD for major project changes. 'These include (a) changes of substance in project activities, design, or research plan.%set forth in the approved application; (b) changes in the project director or other key personnel identified in the approved application; (c) expenditure of project funds representing more than a 15 percent or $2,500 variation, whichever is greater, in any categoy of the total approved budget, including both CJD grant funds and grantee contribution; and (d) all additions to or deletions of approved equipment purchases. Any project changes in the grantee's prerogative to initiate are subject to cost allowability and budget guidelines that may be described in the CJD publications mentioned in the preamble to this section. 7.' Application review changes. Any changes effected in this application as a result of or during the course Page 5A • of CJD review will be deemed to have been ratified by the grantee upon CJD's receipt of the grantee's j request for funds or acceptance agreement . 8- Maintenance of records. Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, required reports, and all other records pertinent to the grant project or any component part thereof shall be retained for three years from the date of the grantees submission of the final expenditure report, except that records for nonexpendable property acquired with federal grant fundssltall be retained for three years after final disposition. The records shall be retained beyond the three -year period if audit findings have not been resolved. Provisions to this effect must be included in all contracts, subcontracts, or other arrangements for implementation of this project or any component thereof. - 9 Inspecilon and audit The State of Texas, the U.S. Department of Justice, and the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives shall have access to any books, , documents, papers, and records pertinent to this grant project for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts, and transcripts. A provision to this effect shalt be included in all contracts, subcontracts, or other arrangements for implementation of this project or any component therof. 10- Termination of aid. A grant may be terminated or fund payments discontinued by CJD if it finds a substantial failure to comply with the provisions of P.L. 90 -351 or regulations promulgated thereunder, Including these grant conditions or application obligations, but only after notice and hearing and • pursuant to all procedures set forth in Sections 510 and 511 of P.L. 90 -351. 1L Obligation of grant funds. Grant funds may not, without advance written approval by CJD, be obli- gated prior to the effective date or subsequent to the termination date of the grant period. Obligations outstanding as of the termination date shall be liquidated within 90 days. Such obligations must be related to goods or services provided and utilized for ultimate program purposes. 12- Title to property. Title to property acquired wholly or partly with grant project funds in accordance ' with approved budgets shall vest in the grantee, subject to divestment at the option of LEAA or CJD - (to the extent federal funds contributed to the acquisition thereof) exercisable only on notice within 180 days after the end of the grant period or termination of the grant The grantee shall exercise due care in the use, maintenance, protection, and preservation of such property during the period of grantor interest. 13. Use of property for law enforcement purposes. All property acquired tvith grant project.funds or donated property representing a grantee contribution shall be committed to use for law enforcement purposes throughout its useful life. 14. Yioject income. All interest or other income earned by a grantee with respect to grant funds or as a result of conduct of the grant project (sate of publications, registrations fees, service charges on fees,. etc.) must be accounted for. Income should be applied to project purposes or in reduction of project cost. Interest earned on grant funds must be returned to CJD. All other project income must be applied to project purposes or as a reduction of total project cost. 15- Publications. The grantee may publish, at its own expense, the results of grant activity without prior CJD review provided that any publication (written, visual, or sound) contains an acknowledgement of CJD grant support. The following disclaimer must be contained in the aforementioned acknowledge- ment: The fact that the Criminal Justice Division furnished financial support to the activity described in this publication does not necessarily indicate the concurrence of the Criminal Justice Division in the statements or conclusions contained herein. At least 25 copies of any such publication must be furnished to CJD but only 10 copies of training materials (where used in grant project) must be supplied, except as otherwise requested or approved by CJD. I'nblication of documents or reports with grant funds beyond quantities required to meet btan- dard report requirements must be provided for in approved project plans or budgets or otherwise approved by CJD and, for large quantity publication, manuscripts must be submitted in advance to CJD. Page 5B 16. Copyrights. Where activities supported by this grant produce original books, manuals, films, computer programs (including executable computer programs and, supporting data in any form), or other copy- rightable material, the grantee may copyright such, but CJD reserves a royalty -free, uonexclus €ve, and irrevocable license to produce, publish, and use such materials, and to authorize others to do so. Disposition of royalties will be determined by CJD. Provisions appropriate to effectuate the purposes of this condition must be in all employment contracts, consultants' agreements, and other contracts. 17. Patents. if any discovery or invention arises or is developed in the course of or as a result of work performed under this grant, by the grantee or contractor, the grantee shall refer the discovery or invention to CJD, which will determine whether or not patent protection will be sought; how any rights therein, including patent rights, will be disposed of and administered; and the need for other action required to protect the public interest in work supported with federal funds, all iri accordance with the Presidential Memorandum of October 10, 1963, on Government Patent Policy. In the final narrative report the grantee shall identify any discovery or invention arising under or developed in the course of or as a result of work performed under this grant or shall certify that there are.no such inventions or discoveries. 1& Allowable costs. The allowability of costs incurred under any grant shall be determined in accordance with the general principles of allowability and standards for selected cost items set forth in Office of Management and Budget Circular A -37, 'Principles for Determining Costs Applicable to Grants and Contracts with State and Local Governments," as further defined and delimited in conditions in the CJD Guide for Grant Administration. Educational institutions are subject to standards set forth In OMB Circular A -21. 19. Expenses not allowable. Grant funds may not be expended for (a) items not part of the approved budget or separately approved by CJD; (b) purchase of land and construction of buildings or imple. mentation of improvements thereon, or payment of real estate mortgages or taxes, unless specifically provided for in the grant agreement; (c) entertainment, amusements, or social activities, or incidental costs related thereto; (d) purchase of automobiles or other automotive vehicles unless provided for in the grant agreement; or (c) Indirect (overhead) costs, if the grantee does not have an indirect cost allocation plan and rate acceptable to CJD, except negotiated lump sum amounts included in the approved application budget. 20. Proposal costs. Grant funds may not be committed or expended for costs of preparing proposals without prior CID approval. 21. Third party participation. No contract or agreement not incorporated in the approved proposal or approved in advance by CJD may be entered into by the grantee for execution of project activities or provision of services to a grant project (other than purchase of supplies or standard commercial or maintenance services less than $2,500). Any such arrangements shall provide that the grantee vvill retain ultimate control and responsibility for the grant project and that the contractorshall be bound by these grant conditions and any other requirements applicable to the grantee in the conduct of the project. 22. Clean Air Act. In accordance with Presidential Executive Order 11602 and the provisions of the Clean Air Act, 42 USC 1357 et seq., as amended by P.L. 91.60.4, 1970, any grant may be lenrimated and _ expenditure of federal funds will be discontinued if at any time during the grant period the grantee has been convicted of an offense under the Clean Air Act. Grantee may not contract with any party convicted under the Clean Air Act. Applicant certifies that it has not been convicted of any violation of the Clean Air Act. -23. Hatch Act. All persons funded by or contributing to this project agree to comply with Title 5, Chapter 15, Sectiois 1501 through 1505 and any amendments thereto, United States Code Annotated, more commonly known as the "Hatch Act" relating to political activities. 29. Release of infoimation. Pursuant to Section 521 of the Act, all records, reports, papers, and other documents kept by recipients of CJD funds, including grantees and their contractors, relating to the receipt and disposition of such funds are required to be made available to CJD and LEAA, under the terns and conditions of the Federal Freedom of Information Act. Page 5C 25. Relocation assistance. In conformance with the requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Land Acquisitions Policies Act of 1970 (42 USC 4G33), applicant hereby declares that this project will not result in the displacement of one or more persons, businesses, or farm operations, and that no real property shall be acquired for project purposes. If this declaration cannot be made, CJD will provide the applicant a Relocation Assistance Certificate that must be completed before consideration of the application. 26. Environmental impact. Any application for a grant involving: (a) construction, purchase, or alteration of facilities; (b) implementation of programs involving the use of herbicides and pesticides; or (c) other actions determined by the LEAA Regional Administrator to have a possibly significant effect on the quality of the environment must include either a draft environmental statement as required by Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act or a declaration that the proposed action will not have a significant impact on the environment. 27. historic sites. In any grant project involving construction, renovation, purchasing, or leasing of facilities the grantee shall consult with the state liaison officer for historic preservation to determine whether the undertaking may have an effect on properties fisted in the National Register of Historic Places. If the undertaking may have an advere effect. on the listed program properties CJD must be notified - before consideration of the application. 28. Education support. No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation In, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to, discrimination under any education program or activity receiving CJD financial assistance with the exception of the qualifications set forth in 71t1e IX, Section 901(A) of Public Law 92 -313 (86 Stat. 373). To validate this application, the following special items must be certified and agreed to by the applicant: Special Items Nonsupplanting requirement. In compliance with the requirement that federal funds, made available under Part C, Title I, Public Law 90.351, as amended, be used "not to supplant state or local funds," this is to .certify that the below described recipient of federal funds under Part C, Title I, Public Law 90.351, as amended, will use such fund. to increase state or local funds that would, in the absence of such federal aid, be made available for law enforcement purposes. It is understood that the above certification by the financial officer will be required on the final report of expenditures and status of action grant funds. Assurance of compliance with Civil Rights Act of 1964. The applicant hereby agrees that it will comply and will insure compliance by its contractors with Title VI of the Civil Rights act of 1964 (Public Law 83 -352) and all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Regulations of the Department of Justice (29 CRF Part 42) issued pursuant to that title, to the end that no person shall on the grounds of race, color, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the applicant receives federal financial assistance. The grantee further will comply with and insure compliance by its contractors with Justice Department equal employ- ment regulation in federally assisted programs to the end that employment discrimination in such programs on the grounds of race, color, creed, sex, or national origin shall be eliminated. The grantee recognizes the right of the United States to seek judicial enforcement in its contracts. Assurance of compliance with Title 28, Part 42, nondiscrimination; equal opportunity; Police and Procedures — Subpart E —Equal Opportunity Guidelines. The applicant hereby agrees that it has complied with the requirements of Subpart E and has filed the required certification and where applicable has on file a current affirmative action plan. Applicant's agreement. It is understood and agreed by the applicant that any grant received as a result of this application shall be subject to the above standard conditions, special items, and other policies and rules issued by the Criminal Justice Division for administration of grant projects; 211 provisions under P.L. 90-351, as amended; and memoranda issued by CJD. Certified by: Signature Name Title Date- Agency I Form CJD -1 (111174) EQUAL EitIPLOYbIENT OPPORTUNITY PROGRAIM CERTIFICATION I W. C. Banner, Acting Chief of Police ,certify that- E:[ This agency employs fewer than 50 people or has received or applied for less than $25,000 from Criminal Justice Division, therefore, the (criminal justice agency) is not required to file an equal opportunity program in accordance with 28 CFR. 42.301 et seq., Subpart E. )� This agency employs 50 or more people and has received or applied to the Criminal Justice e Division, Office of the Governor for total funds in excess of $25,000, therefore, the Corpus Christi Pol ire DPnartmant has formulated an equal employment (criminal justice agency) opportunity program in accordance with 28 CFR 42.201, et seq., Subpart E if applicable, ar�d That it is on file in the office of Charles Speed. Director of Personnel _ P- n _ Box Z /7, Corpus Christi, Tx. 78408 (name, address, title) for review or audit by an official of the Criminal Justice Division, Office of the Governoror the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, as required by relevant laws and regulations. Q This sbite agency or department has received LEAA funds from the Criminal Justice Divi- sion, Office of the Governor, therefore, the • (criminal justice agency) has formulated an equal employment opportunity program in accordance with the Appro- priations hill, 63rd Legislature, Regular Session and with 28 CFR 42.301 et seq., Subpart E If applicable, and that it is on file in the office of _ (name, address, title) for review or audit by an official of the Criminal Justice Division, Office of the Governor or the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, as required by relevant laws and regulations. PROJECT TITLE Nueces County Organiz -d rim on rnl nr,i+ GRANT NUMBER 77 -B4 Official Authorized to Sign Application Project Director //- zG -7G DATE DATE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DAY OF A , 19-2-4- TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE OF THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE, A PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND IMPERATIVE NECESSITY EXIST FOR THE SUSPEN- SION OF THE CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT THAT NO ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE PASSED FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED, AND THAT SUCH ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION SHALL BE READ AT THREE MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL; I, THEREFORE, REQUEST THAT YOU SUSPEND SAID CHARTER RULE OR REQUIREMENT AND PASS THIS ORDI- NANCE FINALLY ON THE DATE IT IS INTRODUCED, OR AT THE PRESENT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL. RESPECTFULLY, MAYOR THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS THE CHARTER RULE WAS SUSPENDED BY T E FOLLOWING VOTE: JASON Way OR. BILL TIPTON EDUARDO DE ASES RUTH GILL + Boa GULLEY GABE LOZANO, SR. _ + EDWARD L. SAMPLE t THE ABOVE ORDINANCE WAS PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: d ' JASON LUBY DR. BILL TIPTON r EDUARDO DE ASES = RUTH GILL BOB GULLEY GABE LOZANO, SR. Y 6 EDWARD L. SAMPLE