Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet City Council - 07/20/2010MEM ■ ■I krosiltri"r0 11:45 A.M. - Proclamation declaring Tuesday, July 20, 2010 as the "Hamlin Pharmacy - 50`h Anniversary Observance Day" Proclamation declaring Saturday, August 7, 2010 as "Feria De Las Flores Day" Certificate of Commendation: Owen R. Hopkins - "Science is Fun ?" and his many contributions to schools and community Certificate of Commendation: World Changers - Volunteers of the Model Block Program neighborhood revitalization efforts AGENDA CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1201 LEOPARD ST. CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 JULY 20, 2010 12 :00 P.M. PUBLIC NOTICE - THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE PROHIBITED iN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF THE CiTY COUNCIL. Members of the audience will be provided an opportunity to address the Council at approximately 4:00 p.m., or the end of the Council Meeting, whichever is earlier. Please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. Your presentation will be limited to three minutes. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Si Listed desea dirigirse al Concilio y tree que su ingles es limitedo, habrrr un interprete ingles- espaiiol en Codas las juntas del Concilio para ayudarle. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or services are requested to contact the City Secretary's office (at 381- 826 -3105) at least 48 hours in advance so that appropriate arrangements can be made. A. Mayor Joe Adame to call the meeting to order. B. Invocation to be given by Pastor Stan Whites, Grace United Methodist Church. C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States. D. City Secretary Armando Chapa to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. Mayor Joe Adame Mayor Pro Tem Larry Elizondo, Sr. Council Members: Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla Leal John Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott City Manager Angel R. Escobar City Attorney Carlos Valdez City Secretary Armando Chapa Agenda Regular Council Meeting July 20, 2010 Page 2 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) E. MINUTES: 1. Approval of Regular Meeting of July 13, 2010. (Attachment # 1) F. BOARDS & COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: (Attachment # 2) 2. * Civil Service Board /Commission * Ethics Commission * Oil and Gas Advisory Committee * Planning Commission G. EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION: For administrative convenience, certain of the agenda items are listed as motions, resolutions, or ordinances. If deemed appropriate, the City Council will use a different method of adoption from the one listed; may finally pass an ordinance by adopting it as an emergency measure rather than a two reading ordinance; or may modify the action specified. A motion to reconsider may be made at this meeting of a vote at the last regular, or a subsequent special meeting; such agendas are incorporated herein for reconsideration and action on any reconsidered item. H. CONSENT AGENDA Notice to the Public The following items are of a routine or administrative nature. The Council has been furnished with background and support material on each item, and/or it has been discussed at a previous meeting. All items will be acted upon by one vote without being discussed separately unless requested by a Council Member or a citizen, in which event the item or items will immediately be withdrawn for individual consideration in its normal sequence after the items not requiring separate discussion have been acted upon. The remaining items will be adopted by one vote. CONSENT MOTIONS, RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES AND ORDINANCES FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS: (At this paint the Council will vote on all motions, resolutions and ordinances not removed for individual consideration) 3. Motion approving the purchase of four (4) heavy trucks in the amount of $528,822; and the lease purchase of three (3) heavy trucks in the amount of $246,533 for a grand total of $775,355.00. The equipment is awarded to the following companies for the following amounts in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI- 0160 -10 based on low bid meeting Agenda Regular Council Meeting July 20, 2010 Page 3 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) specifications and low bid. The heavy trucks will be used by the Street, Water, and Wastewater Departments. All units are replacements to the fleet. Funding for the purchase of the heavy trucks is available in the Capital Outlay Budget of the Maintenance Services Fund. Financing for the lease purchase of the heavy trucks will be provided through the City's lease /purchase financing contractor. (Attachment # 3) Corpus Christi Freightliner, Western Star Corpus Christi, TX Items: 1, 2, 3, & 4 $669,095 Grand Total: $775,355 SanTex Truck Center San Antonio, TX Item: 5 $106,260 4. Motion approving the purchase of one hundred and fifty (150) units of soft body armor from Nardis, Inc., of San Antonio, Texas in accordance with Bid Invitation No. B1- 0048 -10 based on best value for a total amount of $94,050. Funds are available from the Edward Byrne Justice Assistance Grant in the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund. (Attachment # 4) 5. Motion approving the purchase of hardware, software, and services to upgrade the Port Aransas and Packery Channel 800 Mhz radio sites to Project 25 capable systems from Dailey & Wells Communications, of San Antonio, Texas based on sole source for a total expenditure of $113,400. Funds are available through the Public Safety Interoperable Communications Grant. (Attachment # 5) 6. Motion approving the purchase of one (1) 2010 Dodge 3500D ambulance from Dallas Dodge Chrysler Jeep of Dallas, Texas for the total amount of $115,000. The award is based on the cooperative purchasing agreement with the Houston Galveston Area Council (H -GAC). This ambulance will be used to replace Medic Unit 2 which was in an accident and damaged beyond repair. Funds for the purchase of the ambulance are in the FY2009 -2010 Fire Department Operating Budget. (Attachment # 6) 7. Resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a lease agreement with Del Mar College for 2,310 square feet of office and classroom space at Del Mar College West Campus to Agenda Regular Council Meeting July 20, 2010 Page 4 8. 9. CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) be used to provide administrative and instructional support to the Fire Academy, for annual rental payment of $40,000, subject to automatic annual renewals. (Attachment # 7) a. Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to submit a grant application, for the Solid Waste Department, in the amount of $25,000, to the Coastal Bend Council of Governments for recycling and anti -litter education and to execute all related documents. (Attachment # 8) b. Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to submit a grant application, for the Neighborhood Services Department, in the amount of $31,000, to the Coastal Bend Council of Governments to fund a tire recycling event, and an advertising and educational campaign to promote proper disposal of tires and to execute all related documents, (Attachment # 8) c. Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to submit a grant application in the amount of $5,000 to the Coastal Bend Council of Governments for projects sponsored by the Advisory Committee on Community Pride and Clean City Advisory Committee to fund clean up, beautification and recycling events, and to execute all related documents. (Attachment # 8) a. Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept a grant of $50,000 from the Texas Department of State Health Services for personnel costs and travel expenses to fund a Hospital Preparedness Program relating to a plan for responding to an act of terrorism and to execute all related documents; and ratifying acceptance of the grant agreement to begin July 1, 2010. (Attachment # 9) b. Ordinance appropriating a grant of $50,000 from the Texas Department of State Health Services in the No. 1066 Health Grants Fund to fund a Hospital Preparedness Program relating to a plan for responding to an act of terrorism. (Attachment # 9) Agenda Regular Council Meeting July 20, 2010 Page 5 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) 10. Resolution amending Council Policy No. 14, "Boards, Commissions, and Committee Procedures" to limit service on boards, commissions, committees or corporations, effective upon passage. (Attachment # 10) 11. Ordinance authorizing the resale of seventy -four (74) properties for $234,030 which were foreclosed upon for failure to pay ad valorem taxes, with opening bids at a tax resale auction of 30% of the most recent tax appraisal value, as described on the attached Exhibit A. (Attachment # 11) 12. Ordinance appropriating $360,682.91 in the General Fund No. 1020 from the Unreserved Fund Balance for reimbursement of improvements made by the Corpus Christi Independent School District at the Natatorium; changing FY 2009 -2010 Operating Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 028252 by increase appropriations by $360,682.91. (Attachment # 12) 13. Ordinance appropriating $125,000 from the Unreserved Fund Balance in the Fund No. 5612 for Workers Compensation Claims Costs; changing the FY 2009 -2010 Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 028252 by increasing expenditures by $125,000. (Attachment # 13) 14. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 26 to the professional architectural /engineering services contract with Pierce, Goodwin, Alexander and Linville, Inc. (PGAL) of Dallas, Texas in an amount not to exceed $97,087.83, for a restated not to exceed total fee of $4,024,859.13 for additional construction management and inspection services for Taxiway Rehabilitation Project No. 10019, Taxiway Signage /Lighting Project No. 10020, Airfield Drainage Phase 6 Project No. 10021, and Airfield Perimeter Road Improvements Project No. 10027. (Attachment # 14) 15. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a Job Order Contract with Barcom Commercial Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the amount of $136,992.83 for Fire Station # 12 Driveway and Parking Lot Installation located at 2120 Rand Morgan Road. (BOND ISSUE 2004) (Attachment # 15) 16. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Environmental Consulting Services Contract with the Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program, Inc. Agenda Regular Council Meeting July 20, 2010 Page 6 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $155,721 for a restated not to exceed fee of $527,441 for Phase 2 of the Nueces River Basin Feasibility Study ( Nueces Delta Ecological Field Research and Nueces Delta Hydrodynamic Transport Analysis and Modeling). (Attachment # 16) 17. Ordinance abandoning and vacating a 1,509.327- square foot portion of a utility easement out of Tyler Subdivision, Block 1, Lots 2, 12, and 13, and Tract B; requiring the owner, BL Real Estate Holding Company, LP to comply with the specified conditions. (Attachment # 17) 1. EXECUTIVE SESSION: PUBLIC NOTICE is given that the City Council may elect to go into executive session at any time during the meeting in order to discuss any matters listed on the agenda, when authorized by the provisions of the Open Meeting Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, and that the City Council specifically expects to go into executive session on the following matters. In the event the Council elects to go into executive session regarding an agenda item, the section or sections of the Open Meetings Act authorizing the executive session will be publicly announced by the presiding office. 18. Executive Session under Texas Government Code Section 551.071 regarding the City of Corpus Christi, Texas vs. Friends of the Coliseum, Cause No. 10- 60455 -4, in the County Court at Law Number 4, Nueces County, with possible discussion and action in open session. J. PUBLIC HEARINGS: ZONING CASE: 19. Case No. 0610 -01, Raloh and Irma Rivera: A change in zoning from the "B-4" General Business District to the "1 -2" Light Industrial District to allow for a vehicle storage facility on property described as 1.266 acres, Patrick Gardens Block 1, Lot 3A North 102.7'; Patrick Gardens portion Lot 1, North 125' of Lots 2 & 3; Patrick Gardens 50' x 132.5' of Lots 1 & 2; Patrick Gardens South 50' of Northeast 186.5' of Lot 1; Patrick Gardens 571 x 100.1' of Lot 1 & East 50.05' of Lot 2, located at 621 Mohawk Street. (Attachment # 19) Agenda Regular Council Meeting July 20, 2010 Page 7 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) Planning Commission and Staffs Recommendation: Denial of the "1 -2" Light industrial District and in lieu thereof, approval of the "B-4/SP" General Business District with a Special Permit subject to seven (7) conditions. ORDINANCE Amending the Zoning Ordinance, upon application by Ralph and Irma Rivera, by changing the Zoning Map in reference to 1.266 acres, Patrick Gardens Block 1, Lot 3A North 102.7'; Patrick Gardens portion Lot 1, North 125' of Lots 2 & 3; Patrick Gardens 50' x 132.5' of Lots 1 & 2; Patrick Gardens South 50' of Northeast 186.5' of Lot 1; Patrick Gardens 57' x 100.1' of Lot 1 & East 50.05' of Lot 2, from "B-4" General Business District to "B-4/SP" General Business District with a Special Permit to allow for a vehicle storage facility, subject to seven (7) conditions; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations from the existing Comprehensive Plan; providing a repealer clause; providing a penalty; providing for publication. K. SPECIAL BUDGET CONSIDERATION ITEMS: PROPOSED CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI BUDGET FY 2010- 2011: 20. a. Second Reading Ordinance - Adopting the City of Corpus Christi Budget for the ensuing Fiscal Year beginning August 1, 2010; to be filed with the County Clerk; appropriating monies as provided in the budget. (First Reading — 07/13/10) (Attachment # 20) b. Second Reading Ordinance - To ratify increase of $1,380,315 in property tax revenues from last year's Operating Budget as reflected in the 2010 -2011 Operating Budget. (First Reading — 07/13/10) (Attachment # 20) PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 39, PERSONNEL: 21. Second Reading Ordinance — Amending Code of Ordinances, Chapter 39, Personnel, Article III Employee Compensation and Classification System, revising Section 39 -309 Coverage Under the City's Group Health Plan to Establish the City Contribution for Citicare Premium Coverage, Revising Section 39 -312 Agenda Regular Council Meeting July 20, 2010 Page 8 22. CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) Retirees Participation in the City's Group Health Insurance Program at Group Rates to clarify that Group Rates are based upon the Retiree Group, Repealing All Other Ordinances, and Rules, or Parts of Ordinances and Rules, in conflict with this Ordinance; Providing for Effective Date. (First Reading — 07/13/10) (Attachment # 21) PROPOSED FEE/RATE INCREASE ADJUSTMENTS INCLUDED IN THE PROPOSED FY 2010 -2011 BUDGET: a. Second Reading Ordinance - Amending Sections 55 -50, 55- 52, 55 -113 and 55 -70(9) and adding new Section 55 -55, 55- 56, and 55 -115, Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi, regarding Water Rates; providing for publication. (First Reading - 07/13/10) (Attachment # 22) b. Second Reading Ordinance - Article Ili, Chapter 12, Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi, regarding the Sunrise Beach Recreation Site; and providing for publication. (First Reading - 07/13/10) (Attachment # 22) c. Second Reading Ordinance - Amending Sections 55 -61 and 55 -63, Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi, regarding Gas Rates; and providing for publication. (First Reading - 07/13/10) (Attachment # 22) d. Second Reading Ordinance - Amending Section 35- 147(d), Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi, regarding Pipeline Reporting Fees; and providing for publication. (First Reading - 07/13/10) (Attachment # 22) e. Second Reading Ordinance - Amending Sections 55 -100, 55 -102, and 55 -148, Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi, regarding Wastewater Rates; and providing for publication. (First Reading - 07/13/10) (Attachment # 22) 1. Second Reading Ordinance - Amending Section 18-1(b)(12), Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi, regarding Fire Code Fees; and providing for publication. (First Reading - 07/13/10) (Attachment # 22) Second Reading Ordinance - Creating new Section 19 -105, Chapter 19, of the Code of Ordinances, regarding Reinspection of Frozen Dessert Machines and related fee; g. Agenda Regular Council Meeting July 20, 2010 Page 9 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) amending the following provisions of Chapter 23, Code of Ordinances: Section 23 -18, entitled "Schedule of Fees for Clinical Health Services and Policies Related to the imposition And Collection of Such Fees," to revise existing fees and applicable provisions; and Section 23 -19, entitled "Fee for Laboratory Testing of Water Samples ", to revise the title and establish new fees for Vector Services; creating new Section 23 -24, Entitled "Rental and Use of Facilities," regarding rental of the Auditorium, equipment, and fees; providing for an effective date; providing for penalties; and providing for publication. (First Reading - 07/13/10) (Attachment # 22) h. Second Reading Ordinance - Amending various provisions of Chapter 21 of the Code of Ordinances, entitled "Garbage, trash and other refuse" to revise existing fees, add new definitions and language, and establish new fees; providing for an effective date; providing for penalties; and providing for publication. (First Reading - 07/13/10) (Attachment # 22) i. Second Reading Ordinance - Amending Code of Ordinances, Chapter 17, to establish fees for Public Information Office: $25 CCTV Community Event Bulletin Board slide fee, and $75/hour fee for video production services, and include Council Chambers audio video services after business hours fee of $50/hour; providing an effective date; and providing for publication. (First Reading - 07/13/10) (Attachment # 22) Second Reading Ordinance - Amending the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 2 regarding $5.00 Lost Library Item Processing Fee; providing an effective date, and providing for publication. (First Reading - 07/13/10) (Attachment # 22) k. Second Reading Ordinance - Amending Section 31/2 -2, Code of Ordinances relating to the fees charged for Alarm Systems; providing an effective date, and providing for publication. (First Reading - 07/13/10) (Attachment # 22) 23. Ordinance amending Chapter 14 "Development Services," Article XI1I, "Development Services Fees ", Division 1, "Technical Construction Code Fees ", Section 14 -1302, "Standardized Building Valuation "; Section 14-1304, "Processing And Plan Review Fee "; Section 14 -1306, "Special Fees "; Section 14- Agenda Regular Council Meeting July 20, 2010 Page 10 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) 1307, "Reduced Fees"; Section 14 -1312, "Accounting "; and Section 14 -1313, "Technical Construction Code Fee Schedules ", of the Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi, to provide for minimum permit fees, simplified methods to calculate building permit fees and plan review fees; to provide for expedited plan review by internal staff; to provide for special inspections on non - standard days and hours; to provide for fees for construction site offices, fees for both standard and duplicate certificates of occupancy, fees for temporary events, penalty fees, inspections outside of the City limits, electrical permit fees, plumbing permit fees, mechanical permit fees, fuel gas permit fees, swimming pool fees; and providing for fees for existing applications made prior to the effective date; providing a repealer clause; and providing an effective date of October 1, 2010. (Attachment # 23) L. REGULAR AGENDA CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS. RESOLUTIONS, AND ORDINANCES: 24. Resolution declaring the City of Corpus Christi's interest in supporting a private development effort to create an anchor project for future development and re- development in an area in the vicinity of the American Bank Center. (Attachment # 24) 25. First Reading Ordinance - Renaming the park located at 1516 Seventh Street from Qceanview Park to Catalina Martinez Park. (Attachment # 25) 26. a. Summary of the Results of Privatization and Outsourcing, Reorganization, and Operational & Management Practices initiative — Phase 1. (Tabled on 7/06/10) (Attachment # 26) b. Ordinance appropriating $175,000 from the Unreserved Fund Balance in the General Fund No. 1020 for Privatization & Outsourcing Services — Phase 2; changing the FY 2009- 2010 Operating Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 028252 by increasing expenditures in the General Fund No. 1020 by $175,000. (Tabled on 7106/10) (Attachment # 26) c. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate a service agreement (OPTION 1) with Crowe Horwath LLP of Irving, TX, for an amount not to exceed Agenda Regular Council Meeting July 20, 2010 Page 11 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) $175,000, to provide for the quantifying of projected dollar amounts of cost - saving /revenue enhancing initiatives, and for other related services ( "Phase 2 ") concerning the privatizing and outsourcing of certain portions of the City's municipal government functions. The term of the service agreement will extend through the date Crowe Horwath presents its results to City Council. Funding is to be appropriated in the General Fund in FY 2009 -2010. (Tabled on 7/06/10) (Attachment # 26) d. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to select one to five Privatization & Outsourcing initiatives (OPTION 2) and to negotiate a service agreement with Crowe Horwath LLP of Irving, TX, for an amount commensurate with the one to five Privatization & Outsourcing initiatives selected by the City Manager or his designee, to provide for the quantifying of projected dollar amounts of cost - saving/revenue enhancing initiatives, and for other related services ( "Phase 2 ") concerning the privatizing and outsourcing of certain portions of the City's municipal government functions. The City Manager's selections and the negotiated service agreement will be presented to City Council for final approval prior to implementation of Phase 2. The term of the service agreement will extend through the date Crowe Horwath presents its results to City Council. (Tabled on 7/06/10) (Attachment # 26) e. Motion authorizing the City Council's Administration Committee to select one to five Privatization & Outsourcing initiatives (OPTION 3) and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate a service agreement with Crowe Horwath LLP of Irving, TX, for an amount commensurate with the one to five Outsourcing & Privatization initiatives selected by the City Council's Administration Committee, to provide for the quantifying of projected dollar amounts of cost - saving /revenue enhancing initiatives, and for other related services ( "Phase 2 ") concerning the privatizing & outsourcing of certain portions of the City's municipal government functions. The City Council's Administration Committee's selections and the corresponding service agreement negotiated by staff will be presented to City Council for final approval prior to implementation of Phase 2. Agenda Regular Council Meeting July 20, 2010 Page 12 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend al the end of the agenda summary) The term of the service agreement will extend through the date Crowe Horwath presents its results to City Council. (Tabled on 7/06/10) (Attachment # 26) 27. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract with Huff and Mitchell, Inc. of Cypress, Texas, in the amount of $1,500,000 for the first 12 -month period (Base Year) for the Oso Water Reclamation Plant Service Area Collection System Enhancement Program Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract. (Attachment # 27) 28. a. Ordinance appropriating $2,507,500 from a Department of Energy Grant in the No. 1071 Community Enrichment Grants Fund for development of an Energy Efficiency Conservation Strategy and Community Sustainability Plan. (Attachment # 28) b. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a Professional Services contract in the amount of $1,471,000 with HDR Engineering of Corpus Christi, Texas for preparation and implementation of the Energy Efficiency Conservation Strategy and Community Sustainability Plan. (Attachment # 28) 29. Motion approving the purchase of ten (10) pickup trucks, ten (10) light duty pickup trucks, four (4) heavy duty vans, and two (2) medium duty trucks and the installation of dedicated CNG Fuel System Conversion on ten (10) vehicles from the following companies for the following amounts in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI- 0145 -10, based on low bid, best bid and low bid meeting specifications, for a total amount of $800,752.75. These vehicles will be used by the Gas, Water and Wastewater Departments. Twenty -three (23) vehicles are replacement units and three (3) units are additions to the fleet. Funding for the purchase of vehicles is available in the Water Fund, Community Enrichment Grant Fund No. 1071 and the Capital Outlay budget of the Maintenance Services Fund. (Attachment # 29) Westway Ford Irving, TX Line Items: 1, 2, 3, & 8 $244,688 Holiday Ford Whitesboro, TX Line Items: 5, 9, & 11 $167,555.75 0 0 Cil Agenda Regular Council Meeting July 20, 2010 Page 13 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) Champion Ford Access Ford Corpus Christi. TX Corpus Christi. TX Line Items: 4, 6, 7, & 10 Line Item: 12 $253,509 $135,000 Grand Total: $800,752.75 30. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a Construction Contract with Bay, Ltd. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $2,107,855.57 for the Police Vehicle Impound Facility, Phase 1 for the Total Base Bid plus Additive Alternate Nos. 1, 3 and 4. (BOND ISSUE 2008) (Attachment # 30) 31. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a Construction Contract with KST Electric of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $1,828,992.39 for the O.N. Stevens Process Monitoring Instrumentation and Automation Improvements for the total base bid. (Attachment # 31) 32. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Change Order No. 23 to the construction contract with Haas Anderson Construction of Corpus Christi, Texas in an amount not exceed $84,379.65, for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $15,540,947 for 12 months extended landscape maintenance with option to renew for 12 months and installation of skate stopper devices for the Bayfront Development Plan — Phase 1 Improvements. (BOND ISSUE 2008) (CIP FY 2009) (Attachment # 32) M. PRESENTATIONS: Public comment will not be solicited on Presentation items. 33. New Economic Development Website Demonstration (Attachment # 33) N. PUBLIC COMMENT FROM THE AUDIENCE ON MATTERS NOT SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA WILL BE HEARD AT APPROXIMATELY 4 :00 P.M., OR AT THE END OF THE COUNCIL MEETING, WHICHEVER IS EARLIER. PLEASE LIMIT PRESENTATIONS TO THREE MINUTES. IF YOU PLAN TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL DURING THIS TIME PERIOD, PLEASE SIGN THE FORM AT THE REAR OF THE COUNCIL CHAMBER, GIVING YOUR NAME, ADDRESS AND TOPIC. (A recording is made of the meeting; therefore, please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. Agenda Regular Council Meeting July 20, 2010 Page 14 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUES (Refer to legend at the end of the agenda summary) If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary.) PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT PROHIBITS THE CITY COUNCIL FROM RESPONDING AND DISCUSSING YOUR COMMENTS AT LENGTH. THE LAW ONLY AUTHORIZES THEM TO DO THE FOLLOWING: 1. MAKE A STATEMENT OF FACTUAL INFORMATION. 2. RECITE AN EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO THE INQUIRY. 3. ADVISE THE CITIZEN THAT THIS SUBJECT WILL BE PLACED ON AN AGENDA AT A LATER DATE. PER CITY COUNCIL POLICY, NO COUNCIL MEMBER, STAFF PERSON, OR MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE SHALL BERATE, EMBARRASS, ACCUSE, OR SHOW ANY PERSONAL DISRESPECT FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE STAFF, COUNCIL MEMBERS, OR THE PUBLIC AT ANY COUNCIL MEETING. THIS POLICY IS NOT MEANT TO RESTRAIN A CITIZEN'S FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. O. CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS: (NONE) P, ADJOURNMENT: POSTING STATEMENT: This agenda was posted an the City's official bulletin, board at the front entrance to City Hall, 1201 Leopard Street, at `—1 :DC p.m., on July 15, 2010. T ∎.,1 3 , Armando Chapa City Secretary NOTE: The City Council Agenda can be found on the City's Home Page at www.cctexas.com on the Thursday before regularly scheduled council meetings. if technical problems occur, the agenda will be uploaded on the Internet by the Friday. Symbols used to highlight action Items that implement council goals are on attached sheet. City Council Goals 2010 -2011 �a • Bayfront and Downtown Initiatives Complete Utility Master Plans Conservation and Recycling Education Plan Comprehensive Economic Development Approach Street Improvement Plan Development Process Improvement Mary Rhodes Pipeline Phase II Water Plan Safe and Healthy Community Initiatives (Gang, Graffiti, and Physical Health Emphasis) Support Continued Military Presence 1 MINUTES CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS Regular Council Meeting July 13, 2010 - 12:00 p.rn. PRESENT Mayor Joe Aflame Mayor Pro Tem Larry Elizondo, Sr. Council Members: Chris Adler Brent Chesney Priscilla Leal John Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott ABSENT Kevin Kieschnick City Staff: City Manager Angel R. Escobar City Attorney Carlos Valdez City Secretary Armando Chapa Mayor Adame called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers of City Hall. The invocation was delivered by Reverend Benjamin Wheeler with Southside Community Church and the Pledge of Allegiance to the United States flag was led by Council Member Chesney. City Secretary Chapa called the roll and verified that the necessary quorum of the Council and the required charter officers were present to conduct the meeting. Mayor Adame called for approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of July 6, 2010. A motion was made and passed to approve the minutes as presented. * * * * * * * * * * * * Mayor Adame called for consideration of the consent agenda (Items 2 - 10). Mr, Jesse Noyola requested that Item 10 be pulled for individual consideration. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: 2. MOTION NO. 2010 -166 Motion approving a supply agreement with Vulcan Construction Materials, L.P., of San Antonio, Texas for approximately 9,000 tons of trap rock in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI- 0169 -10, based on only bid, fora total amount of $354,150 of which $29,512.50 is required for the remainder of FY 2009 -2010. The term of the supply agreement will be twelve months with an option to extend for up to two additional twelve -month periods subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or his designee. Funds have been budgeted by the Street Department in FY 2009 -2010 and have been requested for FY 2010- 2011 The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Chesney, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick was absent. Minutes — Regular Council Meeting July 13, 2010 — Page 2 3. MOTION NO. 2010 -167 Motion approving a service agreement with Longhorn Regional Service Center, LLC, of Killeen, Texas, for the refurbishment of two (2) firefighter brush trucks in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI- 0172 -10, based on only bid, for a total amount of $180,000. The brush trucks will be used by the Fire Department. Funding is available in the Capital Outlay Budget of the Maintenance Services Fund. The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Chesney, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick was absent. 4. MOTION NO. 2010 -168 Motion approving the purchase of a mobile global positioning system (GPS) from GeoShack, of San Antonio, Texas, in accordance with Bid Invitation No. B1- 0144 -10, based on only bid, fora total amount of $77,450. The G PS equipment will be used by the Water, Wastewater, and Storm Water departments. Funding for the purchase of the GPS equipment is available in the above respective operations budgets. The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Chesney, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick was absent. 5. MOTION NO. 2010 -169 Motion authorizing the purchase of specialized equipment for a total amount of $198,523 utilizing funds from the 2008 and 2009 Homeland Security Grant awarded to the City of Corpus Christi and budgeted in the Fire Grant Fund No. 1062. The foregoing motion was, passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Chesney, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick was absent. 6.a. MOTION NO. 2010 -170 Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept a grant in the amount of $384,882 from the Texas Automobile Theft Prevention Authority (ATPA) to continue the motor vehicle theft enforcement grant within the Police Department for Year 10 with a City cash match of $449,758, in -kind services of $14,019, and program income cash match of $8,767, for a total project cost of $857,426 and to execute all related documents. The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Chesney, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick was absent. 6.b. ORDINANCE NO. 028675 Ordinance appropriating $384,882 from the Texas Automobile Theft Prevention Authority (ATPA) in the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund to continue the motor vehicle theft enforcement grant in the Police Department. An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Chesney, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick was absent. Minutes — Regular Council Meeting July 13, 2010 — Page 3 ORDINANCE NO. 028675 Ordinance appropriating an amount of $100,000 (funds received from SMG under contractual obligation to contribute capita; for the American Bank Center) into the No. 4710 Visitors Facility Fund for American Bank Center expenditures; changing the FY 2009 -2010 Operating Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 028252 by increasing revenues and expenditures by $100,000 each. An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Chesney, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye"; Kieschnick was absent. 8. ORDINANCE NO. 028677 Ordinance authorizing the resale of 3.58 acres out of the Gregorio Ferias Grant, Abstract No. 592, Nueces County, Texas, located at 1H -37 South Access Road at Redbird Lane, which was foreclosed upon for failure to pay ad valorem taxes, to Calallen Independent School District for $5,000, of which the City of Corpus Christi shall receive $1,031.56 plus $909.63 for partial payment of City paving and demolition liens. An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Chesney, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick was absent. 9.a. MOTION NO. 2010 -171 Motion authorizing the City Manager to execute a Deferment Agreement with Yorktown Oso Joint Venture, (Developer), in the amount $24,670.10 for future construction of Rodd Field Road as a requirement for Rancho Vista Subdivision Unit 3A, located south of Yorktown Boulevard and east of Rodd Field Road, in accordance with the Platting Ordinance Section V— Required Improvements, Subsection A. 3. b), contingent upon receipt of an acceptable form of financial document compliant with City requirements. The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Chesney, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye"; Kieschnick was absent. 9.b. ORDINANCE NO. 028678 Ordinance appropriating a $24,670.10 payment from Yorktown Oso Joint Venture, made in lieu of half street construction of Rodd Field Road, to the infrastructure Fund No. 4730 for developers share of future construction of Rodd Field Road. An emergency was declared, and the foregoing ordinance was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Chesney, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye'; Kieschnick was absent. Mayor Adame opened discussion on Item 10 regarding the naming of Manuel Q. Salinas Park. Jesse Noyola, 4421 Bluefield, thanked the City Council and the Park and Recreation Advisory Committee, on behalf of the Salinas family, for their approval of the naming of Manuel Q. Salinas Park. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: Minutes — Regular Council Meeting July 13, 2010 — Page 4 10. ORDINANCE NO. 028679 Naming approximately 51.14 acres of Lot 9, Block 7, Cliff Maus Tracts, located near intersection of Airport Road at Horne Road, the Manuel Q. Salinas Park. (First Reading — 07/08/10) The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its second reading with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Chesney, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick was absent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mayor Adame opened discussion on Item 11 regarding the proposed FY2010 -2011 Operating Budget. Assistant City Manager Oscar Martinez explained that this item included the approval of the first readings of the operating budget and setting the property tax rate at the effective rate. Mr. Martinez provided the proposed amendments to the budget including adjusted revenues for gas; increasing the expenditures for the Art Museum of South Texas in the amount of $170,000 and the Botanical Gardens in the amount of $10,000. The following topics pertaining to this item were discussed: the effective tax rate; allocating the savings from the consolidation and reorganization efforts to street maintenance; the budget reduction initiative considerations; allocating additional funding for the Corpus Christi Convention and Visitors Bureau (CBV) by reducing the debt service fund; the development of a rapid response brush pickup fund for use during significant weather events; the Development Services budget; whether Development Services has had conversations with the development community regarding the proposed rate increases; deferring the effective date for the Development Services rates increases and what affect that delay would have on the budget; the street maintenance budget; concerns with consolidating the call center/utility help desk and eliminating park positions; the consolidation of the City's Economic Development Department (EDD) and Corpus Christi Regional Economic Development Corporation (EDC); eliminating the funding for the Deputy City Manager position; the utility rate increases; deferring capital improvement projects; consideration to fund the art organizations that reside in City facilities or that utilize allocated funds for marketing; developing an initiative to fund the arts in the future from the general fund instead of the hotel occupancy tax (HOT) fund; opposition to re- merging Marina operating and Parks and Recreation; zero -based budgeting; the recycling program; consolidation of payroll operations; an explanation of span of control analysis; Municipal Information Systems (MIS) software; reducing to once a week garbage collection; the utility transfer; the amount of the general fund reserve; saving for reducing park maintenance positions; the GASB liability; the increase in health insurance premiums; and the effects for reducing the rate for retiree insurance. Assistant City Manager Martinez stated that 7% of the water utility rate increase is due to the City's debt requirements and 2% to operating costs. Mr. Martinez added that issuance of revenue bonds today are only structured to replenish our commercial paper account that has already been expended for our capital improvements. Mr. Martinez expressed concern that if the City does not meet the utility rate requirement, bond coverage will drop below the required rates, ratings will go down, and interest payments will go up. Mayor Adame called for comments from the audience. Buck Sosa, 3801 Devonshire, spoke regarding the 45% premium increase for retiree health insurance and the 1998 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program Public Safety Officers Health Benefits Provision for disabled officers injured in the line of duty. Ceferino Valenzuela, 4958 Highmeadow, spoke in support of twice a week garbage collection and delaying the recycling program. Mr. Valenzuela also spoke regarding the proposed health care premiums. Rachel Griffith, President of the Greater Corpus Christi —4— Minutes — Regular Council Meeting July 13, 2010 — Page 5 Hospitality Association ( GCCHA); Mike Reeves, Best Western; and Kaushik Bhakta, Hampton Inn & Suites, spoke regarding the proposed budget reductions to the Convention and Visitor Bureau (CVB). Ms. Griffith stated that the membership of the GCCHA request that the Council restore the CVB fundinc to 'ast years level. In response to Council Member Chesney. Assistant City Manager Martinez reported that the City did not make a budget reduction to the CVB and the funding is a contractual commitment with the CVB based on the amount of hotel occupancy tax (HOT) generated. June Martinez, 4014 Herndon, spoke regarding the increase in health insurance costs and suggested mandatory training for employees on changes to the insurance plan. Charles Rogers, 3518 Pecan, spoke regarding the affect the health insurance increase will have on him as a disabled firefighter. Maria Gonzalez, 1813 Amazon, stated that all expenditures need to be suspended and positions should be cut from upper management. William Pettus, 102 Alta Plaza, spoke regarding the reduced level of funding for the CVB. Abel Alonzo, 1701 Thames, expressed disappointment that the recommendations discussed were not made available to the public and spoke regarding delaying the recycling program and considering all alternatives before approving the effective tax rate. Coin Sykes, 309 Aberdeen, thanked the Council for their support of the arts. Mr. Chesney made a motion to reduce the tax rate from the proposed $0.58 to $0.56. The motion was seconded by Ms. Leal. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: The foregoing motion failed with the following vote: Chesney, Elizondo, and Leal, voting "Aye "; Adame, Adler, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "No "; Kieschnick was absent. Mr. Chesney made a motion to amend the proposed budget by eliminating the utility rate increases. The motion was seconded by Ms. Leal. A discussion ensued regarding the debt requirements; the effects to the bond coverage, bond ratings, and interest rates if the utility rates are not increased; changes to the capital improvement program; and capital costs associated with the bond program. Mr. Chesney stated for the record that he has been complaining about the capital improvement program and that changes need to be implemented to improve the system. Council Member Martinez stated that the Council should consider a policy that future bond elections include the cost of utilities. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: The motion failed with the following vote: Chesney and Leal voting "Aye "; Adame, Adler, Elizondo, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "No "; Kieschnick was absent. Mr. Scott made a motion to amend the ordinance by reducing the City's debt service contribution exclusively for the CVB up to $500,000. The motion was seconded by Ms. Martinez. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council on their votes as follows: The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Chesney, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick was absent. Mr. Scott made a motion to create a rapid response brush pickup fund in the amount of $500,000 allocated out of the general fund unappropriated balance. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: The following motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Chesney, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "No "; Kieschnick was absent. Minutes — Regular Council Meeting July 13, 2010 — Page 6 Council Member Scott expressed concern with Development Services lack of communication with the development community. Mr. Scott made a motion directing Development Services to resolve issues or eliminate costs in the department. The motion was seconded by Mr. Chesney. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Chesney, Elizondo, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye"; Kieschnick and Leal were absent. Council Member Scott requested that staff provide a memo explaining the retiree health insurance premiums. A brief discussion ensued regarding the rates for retirees; public safety disabled employees; and the retiree health care reimbursement. Mr. Scott made a motion to move all economic development assets from the City to the Economic Development Corporation. The motion was seconded by Mr. Chesney. The following topics pertaining to this motion were discussed: the City's contribution to the EDC; the saving realized in the general fund for not filling the Director of Economic Development position; the total budget for the Economic Development Department (EDD); and whether the City would retain an office for Economic Development. Roland Mower, CEO of the EDC, stated that he and the City Manager have had extensive conversations on the effort to find a way to deliver comprehensive economic development services to the community at a reduced costs. Mr. Mower added that the EDC has a strong program to handle small business efforts. Mr. Mower reported that the EDC has a contract with the City of Portland that is very consistent with the direction the City is asking the EDC to consider. Ms. Martinez asked if the Council would consider tabling this item for further consideration. Mr. Scott withdrew his motion. Ms. Martinez made a motion to table this item for one week. The motion was seconded by Mr. Chesney. The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Chesney, Elizondo, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick and Leal were absent. Mr. Scott made a motion directing staff to proceed with consolidation and reorganization initiatives with the saving allocated to street maintenance. The motion was seconded by Mr. Chesney. Council Member Marez expressed concern regarding the recommendation to eliminate the tuition reimbursement funds. The foregding motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Chesney, Elizondo, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick and Leal were absent. Council Member Marez asked staff for an update on the allowable uses for the insurance reimbursement from the federal government. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: 11.a. FIRST READING ORDINANCE Adopting the City of Corpus Christi Budget for the ensuing Fiscal Year beginning August 1, 2010; to be filed with the County Clerk; appropriating monies as provided in the budget. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its first reading with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Chesney, Elizondo, and Leal, voting "No "; Kieschnick was absent. -6- Minutes -- Regular Council Meeting July 13,2010 — Page l 11.b. FIRST READING ORDNANCE To ratify increase of S1,380,315 in property tax revenues from last year's Operating Budget as reflected in the 2010 -11 Operating Budget. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its first reading with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Chesney, Elizondo, and Leaf, voting "No "; Kieschnick was absent. Mayor Adame opened discussion on Item 12 regarding the compensation and classification ordinance. Director of Human Resources Cynthia Garcia provided an overview of the proposed revisions to address the changes to the City's contributions for employee health insurance coverage and retiree participation in the City's group health insurance program. In response to Council Member Adler, Ms. Garcia stated that employees eligible for Medicare have been removed from the City plan. Council Member Leal asked questions regarding firefighters receiving social security. Ms. Garcia stated that only those firefighters that have outside employment are eligible to receive social security, There were no comments from the audience. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: 12. FIRST READING ORDINANCE Amending Code of Ordinances, Chapter 39, Personnel, Article Ill Employee Compensation and Classification System, revising Section 39 -309 Coverage Under the City's Group Health Plan to Establish the City Contribution for Citicare Premium Coverage, Revising Section 39- 312 Retirees Participation in the City's Group Health Insurance Program at Group Rates to clarify that Group Rates are based upon the Retiree Group, Repealing All Other Ordinances, and Rules, or Parts of Ordinances and Rules, in conflict with this Ordinance; Providing for Effective Date. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its first reading with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Chesney, Elizondo, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Leal voting "No; Kieschnick was absent. Mayor Adame opened discussion on Item 13 regarding the proposed fee and rate changes to support the proposed FY2010 -2011 Budget. Assistant Director of Budget Eddie Houlihan provided a brief summary of the proposed rates including utility rate increases for water and wastewater, Sunrise Beach recreation site increases; gas lighting charges; increase in the annual pipeline reporting fees; various fire code fees; various health department fees; solid waste fees; public information office fees; lost library item processing fee; charges for alarm systems; and new rental and recreation fees. City Secretary Chapa stated that staff is recommending a change to Item 13.d. prior to first reading to correct the description of the increased fee from $120 to $125. Ms. Martinez made a motion to amend Item 13.d. The motion was seconded by Mr. Marez. The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Chesney, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick was absent. Minutes — Regular Council Meeting July 13, 2010 — Page 8 There were no comments from the audience. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: 13.a. FIRST READING ORDINANCE Amending Sections 55 -50, 55 -52, 55 -113 and 55 -70(9) and adding new Section 55 -55, 55- 55, and 55 -115, Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi, regarding Water Rates; providing for publication. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its first reading with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Chesney, Elizondo, and Leal, voting "No "; Kieschnick was absent. 13.b. FIRST READING ORDINANCE Article III, Chapter 12, Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi, regarding the Sunrise Beach Recreation Site; and providing for publication. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its first reading with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Chesney, Elizondo, and Leal, voting "No "; Kieschnick was absent. 13.c. FIRST READING ORDINANCE Amending Sections 55-61 and 55-63, Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi, regarding Gas Rates; and providing for publication. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its first reading with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Chesney, Elizondo, and Leal, voting "No "; Kieschnick was absent. 13.d. FIRST READING ORDINANCE Amending Section 35- 147(d), Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi, regarding Pipeline Reporting Fees; and providing for publication. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved as amended on its first reading with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Chesney, Elizondo, and Leal, voting "No "; Kieschnick was absent. 13.e. FIRST READING ORDINANCE Amending Sections 55 -100, 55 -102, and 55 -148, Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi, regarding Wastewater Rates; and providing for publication. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its first reading with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Chesney, Elizondo, and Leal, voting "No "; Kieschnick was absent. Minutes — Regular Council Meeting July 13, 2010 — Page 9 13.f. FIRST READING ORDINANCE Amending Section 18- 1(b)(12), Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi, regarding Fire Code Fees; and providing for pubi cation. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its first reading with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Chesney, Elizondo, and Leal, voting "No "; Kieschnick was absent. 13.g. FIRST READING ORDINANCE Creating new Section 19 -105, Chapter 19, of the Code of Ordinances, regarding Reinspection of Frozen Dessert Machines and related fee; amending the following provisions of Chapter 23, Code of Ordinances: Section 23 -18, entitled "Schedule of Fees for Clinical Health Services and Policies Related to the Imposition And Collection of Such Fees," to revise existing fees and applicable provisions; and Section 23 -19, entitled "Fee for Laboratory Testing of Water Samples ", to revise the title and establish new fees for Vector Services; creating new Section 23 -24, Entitled "Rental and Use of Facilities," regarding rental of the Auditorium, equipment, and fees; providing for an effective date; providing for penalties; and providing for publication. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its first reading with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Chesney, Elizondo, and Leal, voting "No "; Kieschnick was absent. 13.h. FIRST READING ORDINANCE Amending various provisions of Chapter 21 of the Code of Ordinances, entitled "Garbage, trash and other refuse" to revise existing fees, add new definitions and language, and establish new fees; providing for an effective date; providing for penalties; and providing for publication. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its first reading with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Chesney, Elizondo, and Leal, voting "No "; Kieschnick was absent. 13.i. FIRST READING ORDINANCE Amending Code of Ordinances, Chapter 17, to establish fees for Public Information Office: $25 CCTV Community Event Bulletin Board slide fee, and $75/hour fee for video production services, and include Council Chambers audio video services after business hours fee of $50/hour; providing an effective date; and providing for publication. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its first reading with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Chesney, Elizondo, and Leal, voting "No "; Kieschnick was absent. 13.j. FIRST READING ORDINANCE Amending the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 2 regarding $5.00 Lost Library Item Processing Fee; providing an effective date, and providing for publication. Minutes — Regular Council Meeting July 13, 2010 — Page 10 The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its first reading with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Chesney, Elizondo, and Leal, voting "No "; Kieschnick was absent. 13.k. FIRST READING ORDINANCE Amending Section 3Y2 -2, Code of Ordinances relating to the fees charged for Alarm Systems; providing an effective date, and providing for publication. The foregoing ordinance was passed and approved on its first reading with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Chesney, Elizondo, and Leal, voting "No "; Kieschnick was absent. 13.1. RESOLUTION NO. 028680 Resolution authorizing adjustment of Parks, Recreation, Cultural, and Leisure time activities rental and recreational fees; adding new rental fees and recreational fees for fiscal year 2010 -2011; providing for publication; providing for an effective date; and providing for severance. The foregoing resolution was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye; Chesney, Elizondo, and Leal, voting "No"; Kieschnick was absent. Mayor Adame opened discussion on Item 14 regarding Development Services fees. Mr. Chesney made a motion to table Item 14 until July 20, 2010. The motion was seconded by Ms. Martinez . The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Chesney, Elizondo, Leal, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Kieschnick was absent. 14. TABLED TO JULY 20, 2010 Amending Chapter 14 " Developmen ises," Miele XIII, "Development Services Fees ", Division 1, "Technical Construe Cade Fees ", Scetiee 14 1302, "Standardized Ba+ld+ng fees; and providing far fccs fe.r existing applications rnade prior to the effective date; * **** * * **** ** Mayor Adame called for petitions from the audience. Joan Veith, 5701 Cain, thanked Paul Bass, Lawrence Mikolajczyk, and City Manager Escobar for their assistance with recycling at the Texas Democratic Convention. Joanna Gilbertson, 4601 Gulf Breeze Boulevard, spoke regarding garbage collection and response to 9 -1 -1 calls. Ms. Gilbertson asked that the Council consider keeping the City safe and clean during their budget deliberations. Minutes — Regular Council Meeting July 13, 2010 — Page 11 * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mayor Adame opened discussion on Item 15 regarding professional auditing services. Assistant Director of Financial Services Michael Sarrera explained that this item is for the approval of auditing services to perform the City's annual audit and complete the City's Annual Financial Report (CAFR). Mr. Barrera introduced the evaluation committee including Senior Buyer Lisa Covington, Controller Anna Marquez, Interim Assistant City Manager Cindy O'Brien, Interim Director of Financial Services Constance Sanchez, and Assistant City Attorney Lisa Aguilar. Mr. Barrera provided an overview of the Request for Proposal (RFP) process; the four major criteria in evaluating the proposals; the proposals received; pricing range; and the recommendation of Collier, Johnson & Woods, P.C. representing the best overall value to the City. The following topics pertaining to this item were discussed: the cost difference between Collier Johnson and the low bidder; whether there was an option to issue this contract under professional services; restructuring the evaluation mechanism to weigh heavier on pricing; the evaluation criteria percentage for the proposer's profile and qualifications; whether auditing services include review of the uncollectible debt; consideration for a fresh perspective on the auditing services; providing additional information to Council to explain the matrix; the reason the contract option extends for a five year period; and local preference. Mayor Adame called for comments from the audience. Abel Alonzo, 1701 Thames, spoke regarding the auditing contract being awarded to Collier, Johnson and Woods, PC for 14 years and that the staff should recommend contracts that are effective and efficient as possible. Ms. Adler made a motion to accept the recommendation by the City Manager. The motion was seconded by Ms. Martinez. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: 15. MOTION NO. 2010 -172 Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a service agreement with Collier, Johnson & Woods, P.C., of Corpus Christi, Texas for $140,000 to provide professional auditing services in accordance with Request for Proposal No. B1- 0139 -10. The term of the agreement will be for twelve months, with an option to extend for up to four additional twelve -month periods, subject to the approval of the contractor and the City Manager or his designee. This service will be used by the Finance Department. Funding is budgeted and available in the General Fund for FY 2010 -2011. The foregoing motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Chesney, Elizondo, Marez, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye "; Leal voting "No "; Kieschnick was absent. Mayor Adame opened discussion on Item 16 regarding an application for financial assistance from the Texas Water Development Board for Raw Water Influent Improvements Project. Deputy Director of Water Operations Mark Van Vleck provided a brief presentation including the proposed improvements; the existing and proposed headworks configuration; the types of funding; initial steps for funding and the path moving forward; the summary of project budget; and the project schedule. Minutes — Regular Council Meeting July 13, 2010 -- Page 12 There were no comments for the audience. City Secretary Chapa polled the Council for their votes as follows: 16. RESOLUTION NO. 028681 Resolution by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi requesting financial assistance from the Texas Water Development Board in the amount of $20,125,500 for the design and construction of improvements to the 0. N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant; authorizing the filing of an application for assistance; and making certain findings in connection therewith. The foregoing resolution was passed and approved with the following vote: Adame, Adler, Chesney, Elizondo, Leal, Martinez, and Scott, voting "Aye"; Kieschnick and Marez were absent. * * * * * * * * * * * ** MayorAdame referred to Item 17 regarding the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment for Nonconforming Lots of Record and for Compact and Clustered Development Overlay. Assistant City Manager of Development Services Johnny Perales introduced the presentation team including Senior Planner Lisa Wargo; David Loeb; and Bart Braseiton. Ms. Wargo provided a brief presentation on Non - Conforming Lots including the new definitions; proposed changes; examples of homes designed on narrow lots; and Planning Commission comments. Ms. Wargo referred to a powerpoint presentation on the Compact and Cluster Development Overlay including standards under the proposed ordinance; the definition and permitted uses; examples of vertical and horizontal duplexes; density; common open space; on -site storm water management; parking; buffers; photos of cluster developments; and Planning Commission comments. The following topics pertaining to this item were discussed: possible locations for the nonconforming lots and the timeline for approval of the ordinances. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mayor Adame recessed the Regular Council meeting to hold the annual corporation meetings for the Corpus Christi Industrial Development Corporation (CCIDC), Corpus Christi Community Improvement Corporation (CCCIC), and the Corpus Christi Housing Finance Corporation (CCHFC). * * * * * * * * * * * * * MayorAdame reconvened the Regular Council Meeting. There being no further business to come before the Council, Mayor Adame adjourned the Council meeting at 5:24 p.m. on July 13, 2010. * * * * * * * * * * * * * a. CIVIL SERVICE BOA_ED COMMISSION — Two (2) vacancies with terms to 6 -15 -11 and 6- 15 -13. (The City Manager appoints to the Civil Service Commission and the City Council appoints to the Civil Service Board. Traditionally, the same member serves on the Board and Commission.) (Appointments to the Commission are subject to confirmation by the City Council) DUTIES: To adopt, amend, and enforce a code of rules and regulations providing for appointment, employment, or suspension in all positions in the classified service based upon citizenship, character, merit, efficiency, and industry, which shall have the force and effect of law; and also rules regulating promotions, demotions, reduction of force of employees in the classified service and in what order they shall be dismissed and reinstated. COMPOSITION: Three (3) members shall be appointed by the Council for three -year terms or until a successor is named. The members choose their own chairman and appoint a chief examiner, not a member of the Board, who shall also act as secretary. ORIGINAL MEMBERS TERMS APPTD. DATES Susanne Bonilla 6 -15 -12 5 -26 -09 ***John Silvas, Chair 6 -15 -11 3 -08 -05 *Eileen Butler 6 -15 -10 7 -11 -06 (The City Manager is recommending the new appointments of Catherine F. Lutz and Hector Saenz, Jr.) INDIVIDUALS EXPRESSING INTEREST Rudy A. Adame Registered Nurse. Received B.A. from Corpus Christi State University and Nursing Degree from Del Mar College. Served in the Army and United States Air Force. Activities include: Selective Service Board. (10 -6 -08) Leaend: *Failed to submit Ethics Report * *Not seeking reappointment ***Resigned "**Exceeded number of absences allowed by ordinance *****Has met six -year service limitation Vicky Jean Alexander Michael Creacy Meredith N. Grant Austin Harbin Jamie Hill Aaron Hoss Retired Nursing House Supervisor, Driscoll Children's Hospital. Received Bachelor of Science from University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas. Activities include: Citizens in Support of the Corpus Christi Police Department and Corpus Christi Police Departments Reorganizational Team. Formerly served on Crime Control and Prevention District, Commission for Children and Youth and Flint Hills Resources Community Action Council. (6-3-10)) Supervisor/Branch Chief, Corpus Christi Army Depot. Received an ASS in Electrical/Electronics Technology from Del Mar College and a Degree in Business Management from University of Incarnate Word. Activities include: Federal Managers Association and American Heart Association CRP Lifesaver and AED Instructor. Recipient of Boy Scouts of America District Award of Merit and Achievement medal for Civilian Service, Special Act or Service Award. (5 -7 -10) Homemaker. Received B.A. in English from Texas A &M University - Corpus Christi. Certified Interior Decorator. Activities include: Junior League of Corpus Christi, Art Museum of South Texas, and Beautify Corpus Christi Association. (10-14-08) Table Tender, Carino's Italian. Attending Del Mar College. Recipient of the National Young Leaders Award and the Eucharistic Cross Bearer Award. (3- 22 -10) Sr. Human Resources Generalist, FMC Technologies. Attended Del Mar College. Activities include: Society of Human Resource Management Association, Corpus Christi Human Resource Management Association, and Volunteer for Salvation Army's Surviving the Night Program. (4 -20- 09) Advanced Metal Finishing Facility Work Leader, Corpus Christi Army Depot. United States Army Veteran. Activities include: Head Elder of Local Church. (7-13 - 10) William Paul Hunt Retired, Environmental Engineer. Received a Bachelors Degree in Meteorology from Texas A &M University - College Station. Formerly served on the Corpus Christi Regional Air Shed Committee. Activities include: Tutoring. (6 -4 -09) Edward Frank Lewis Retired. Received AA from International School of Minister and currently attending South Texas School of Studies. Activities include: Republican Precinct Chair. Recipient of Tejas Kia Employee of the Month. (4- 20 -09) Catherine F. Lutz Market Human Resources Manager, Cintas Corporation. Received a Bachelor of Science in Criminal Justice and a Master of Public Administration from Texas A &M University - Corpus Christi. Activities include: Corpus Christi Human Resources Manager Association and St. Pius Church. (5- 14 -10) Minerva Montalvo - Curiel Administration Sales/Warehouse Manager, Arthur Fluid Systems. Attended College. (5 -7 -09) Joel S. Mumphord Joe Ortiz James M. Richardson Michael 0. San Miguel Retired, Encycle, Inc. Served in Law Enforcement. Activities include: Host of T.V. Show, Community Action Agency, Molina Neighborhood Day Care, HIALCO President. (5- 21 -09) Self- Employed, Home Builder. Attended Del Mar College and Granthem University. Activities include: Building Designer Institute, LULAC District 11 and American GI Forum. (8- 26 -09) Vice - President, Tac Med, Inc. Attended College. (2 -9 -10) Received BS from University of Texas -San Antonio. Formerly Served on Small Business Advisory Board. Participated in City of Corpus Christi Citizen University (2007). Activities include: CampTIA and Pearson. (10 -6- 09) _17_ Hector Saenz, Jr. Abel A. Sanchez Process Control Analyst Supervisor, Citgo Refining and Chemical. Activities include: Instrument Society of America Local Chapter and Credit Union Board. Formerly Served on the Boys and Girls Club and the Special Olympics Committee. (6-22-10) Retired, United States Postal Worker. Attended Del Mar College. Activities include: Youth Football Coach. (4 -16- 09) b. ETHICS COMMISSION — One (1) vacancy with term to 10 -1 -11. (Appointment requires 213 vote (6) of full Council; DUTIES: In addition to having jurisdiction of complaints involving any "city official ", the duties of this commission are to prepare and publish pamphlets and other materials explaining the duties of individuals subject to the code of ethics; review all statements and reports filed with the city; annually review the code of ethics and make appropriate recommendations to the city council; review all public opinions related to the code of ethics that are issued by the city attorney; prepare and disseminate a report listing all campaign contributions and expenditures for each candidate within 30 days following the deadline for filing the last campaign finance reports for each city council election. The commission shall have such meetings as may be necessary to fulfill its responsibilities. The chairperson or any three (3) members may call a meeting provided that reasonable notice is given to each member. The commission shall meet at least once a year. The date of the annual meeting shall be in September. The commission shall comply with the Texas Open Meetings Act. COMPOSITION: Nine members appointed by a two- thirds vote (6) of the full council. Nominations are to be solicited from a wide variety of professional and community organizations in the city but interested individuals may also submit their names for consideration. Initially, the terms of three members shall be one year, and the initial terms of another three terms shall be two years. The persons having such shorter terms shall be determined by lot. No holding over is permitted except as expressly provided in the code of ethics. The commission shall elect a chairperson and a vice- chairperson. ORIGINAL MEMBERS TERM APPTD. DATE Linda Figueroa 10 -01 -12 05 -10 -05 Melvin Bohannon 10 -01 -12 10 -13 -09 William Strawn 10 -01 -11 06 -09 -09 *Rebecca Esparza 10 -01 -11 10 -14 -08 Laura Hebert 10 -01 -10 11 -13 -07 Jennifer Dragoo 10 -01 -12 10 -13 -09 Rick Marcantonio 10 -01 -10 12 -14 -04 Robert N. Corrigan. 10 -01 -10 10 -14 -03 James Richard Cramer, Chair 10 -01 -11 10 -14 -03 Legend: *Failed to submit Ethics Report **Not seeking reappointment ***Resigned ****Exceeded number of absences allowed by ordinance *****Has met six-year service limitation INDIVIDUALS EXPRESSING INTEREST Kristin Aldrighetti Currently Attending College. Received BBA in Marketing from The University of Texas at San Antonio and MS in Secondary Education from Texas A &M University- Corpus Christi. Activities include: Co- Sponsor for Future Business Professionals of America and Sponsor for Helping Hands Youth Community Service Organization. Recipient of CPS Volunteer Award. (10 -5- 09) Mona Baen President, Stewart Title. Activities include: Executive Women's International, Rotary Club, and CCAR. (5 -13- 09) Aaron Castro Dr. Haysam D. Dawod Mike Garey Jack Gordy Photo Journalist, KZTV 10. Currently Student at Texas A &M University- Corpus Christi. Served on Food Advisory Committee in High School. Activities include: Politics. Recipient of Employee of the Month at Action Ten News. (5- 11 -09) Dentist, Dawod Dental. Received BS in Biology from Corpus Christi State University and Doctor of Dental Surgery from University of Texas Health Science Center Dental Branch - Houston. Activities include: ADA, TDA, NVDDS, Rotary Club and Boy Scouts. Formerly Served an the Del Mar Board of Regents. (4- 23 -09) Preparation Chef, OMNI Hotels. Received degree in Architecture from University of Arkansas and a degree in General Business from Texas A &M University- Corpus Christi. Activities include: Habitat for Humanity. (4 -22- 09) Retired military. High school graduate plus one year at Del Mar College. (4- 13 -09) Coretta Graham, Esq. William Paul Hunt Jacey Jetton William M. Kramer, Jr. Peter G. Melve Ronald J. Moore Self - Employed, Attorney — Graham Legal Services. Received BA from Douglass College, Rutgers University at New Brunswick, New Jersey and J.D. from TSU Thurgood Marshall School of Law at Houston, Texas. Activities include: State Bar of Texas Diversity Committee, Coastal Bend Women Lawyers, Leadership Corpus Christi, Kiwanis, Corpus Christi Bar Association, NAACP, and Black Chamber of Commerce. Currently Serves on the CCCIC/Loan Review Committee. (4- 24 -09) Retired, Environmental Engineer. Received a Bachelors Degree in Meteorology from Texas A &M University - College Station. Formerly Served on the Corpus Christi Regional Air Shed Committee. Activities include: Tutoring. (6 -4 -09) Manager, Galaxy Glow Mini Golf, LLC. Received Associates of Business from Northwood University at Cedar Hill, Texas. Served in the Hawaii Army National Guard. (5- 18 -09) Agent, Kramer Insurance Agency. Received Bachelor in Political Science from Texas A &M University - Corpus Christi. (5- 28 -09) Transportation Supervisor, Regional Transportation Authority. Received an Associate Degree in Social Work/Liberal Arts and Bachelor's Degree in Business Administration/Management. Activities include: Westside Business Association and Foster Parent. (3 -2- 09) Plant Manager, Coastal Bend Surgery Center. Owner of Coastal Mediations. Received Associates Degree in Paralegal Studies and Mediation Certification from the South Texas College of Law. Activities include: Dispute Resolution Center, Better Business Bureau Mediation Program, Texas Sandiest and Adopt -A- Beach. (10 -6 -09) Joel S. Mumphord Gerard Navarro, Jr. Keith Parker Retired, Encycle, Inc. Served in Law Enforcement. Activities include: Host of T.V. Show, Community Action Agency, Molina Neighborhood Day Care, HIALCC President. (5- 21 -09) Substitute Teacher, Corpus Christi Independent School District. Currently attending Texas A &M- Corpus Christi. (5- 14 -09) Senior Mechanical Engineer, Bath Engineering/Noresco. Received ES in Mechanical Engineering. Activities include: ASHRAE and AEE. Currently serves on the CCCIC/Loan Review Committee. (4- 23 -09) Guadalupe V. Salinas Administrative Assistant, Pathfinder Energy /Smith International. (8- 24 -09) Abel A. Sanchez Michael O. San Miguel Retired, United States Postal Worker. Attended Del Mar College. *Activities include: Youth Football Coach. (4- 16-09) Received BS from University of Texas -San Antonio. Formerly Served on Small Business Advisory Board. Participated in City of Corpus Christi Citizen University (2007). Activities include: CompTIA and Pearson. (10- 6-09) Amber Sayre Currently Attends Del Mar College, Registered Nurse Program. (10 -6 -09) Stefany Tegeler Schade Sean M. Thorson Self - Employed /Owner, TorOso Financial Group, LLP Received Bachelor's and Master's in Accounting from Texas A &M University- Corpus Christi. Activities include: National Association of Professional Women and Texas Society of Certified Public Accountants. (5- 28-09) Sr. Mortgage Banker, Envoy Mortgage. Attended Brigham Young University, University of Texas, and School of Mortgage Lending at Washington State. Previously involved with Pacific Coast Mortgage Dreams, Coaching Girls Youth Soccer Team, and Sno -King Youth Club. (6 -2 -09) Ernest M. Trevino, Jr. Steve Trubatisky Arthur J. Valdez Larry L. White Retired, United States Postal Service. Received AA from Del Mar College. Served in the United States Air Force. Activities include: Volunteer at USS Lexington. Recipient Good Conduct Medal, United States Air Force. (12- 26 -08) Real Estate Broker Associate, Realty World Island Properties. Attended Tarleton State University, Stephenville, Texas. Activities include: Corpus Christi Association of Realtors. (2-11-09) SAH Agent/Senior Appraiser, Department of Veterans Affairs. Attended Saint Mary's University and San Antonio College in San Antonio, Texas. Activities include: Knights of Columbus, Church Activities, and LULAC. (1- 30 -09) Process Engineer, DuPont. Received BS and MS from Louisiana Tech and MS from Memphis State. Activities include: American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Corpus Christi Bucarader, and Water's Edge Pipe and Drum Band. (6 -5 -09) Felix Zavala, Jr. Pastor, El Shaddai Church. Activities include: Prayer Meetings. (8- 10 -09) c. OIL AND GAS ADVISORY COMMITTEE — Two (2) vacancies with terms to 12 -31- 12 representing the following categories: 1 — Oil Industry and 1 — General Public. (Mayoral appointment with approval of Council) (NOTE: The board has a policy of requesting the appointment of the Alternate member to the vacant regular position and a new person fills the Alternate position.) DUTIES: The committee shall make a continuing study of operations for the exploration, drilling, and production of oil, gas and minerals and the possible effects of same upon the environment, public health, safety and general welfare of the City. COMPOSITION: Eight (8) persons who are residents of Corpus Christi: three (3) members from the oil and gas well industry; three (3) members from the general public who are not connected with the oil and gas well industry; and two (2) altemates: one (1) from the general public to serve in the absence of a public members, and one (1) from the industry to serve whenever an industry member is absent. Public members shall be appointed by the Mayor with approval of the Council; industry members shall be appointed by the Mayor with approval of the Council from those persons nominated by the oil and gas well industry. Members are appointed for three -year terms ending December 31, and may succeed themselves. Meetings are called by the Chairman or any three (3) members of the Committee within specified time limits. Four members constitute a quorum. The committee annually elects its own chairman and vice chairman. Members receive no compensation for their services. ORIGINAL MEMBERS TERM APPTD. DATE *****Charles Jacobs (Oil Industry) 12 -31 -09 12 -16 -03 **Lois Huff (General Public) 12 -31 -09 9 -12 -06 Gretchen Arnold (General Public) 12 -31 -10 12 -14 -04 Robert E. Powell (General Public) 12 -31 -11 12 -09 -08 Glen Cooper (Oil Industry) 12 -31 -11 12 -14 -04 John Cantu (Oil Industry), Chair 12 -31 -10 9 -12 -06 Tom Fisher (Alt., General Public) 12 -31 -10 5 -29 -07 Chet Freeman (Alt., Oil Industry) 12 -31 -10 3 -11 -08 *Seeking reappointment **Not seeking reappointment 'Resigned *Resigned ****Exceeded number of absences allowed by ordinance *****Has met six -year service limitation INDIVIDUALS EXPRESSING INTEREST Savannah Nicole Antunez Received AA in Psychology from Del Mar College and BS in Psychology from Texas Woman's University. Activities include: The Cattery Cat Shelter and Private Tutor. (General Public) (3 -5- 10) Katharine Barrera Owner, Mosaic & Mosaic Kids. Attended University of Texas at Austin. Activities include: Livestrong Army CC, March of Dimes, Planned Parenthood South Texas, and Dress for Success South Texas. (General Public) (4- 15 -10) Michael J. Benning Owner, The Frame Up. Formerly Worked in Oil & Gas Industry and with the Texas Railroad Commission Oil and Gas Regulatory Group. Received BA in Biology and BS in Petroleum Engineering from University of Texas at Austin. Activities include: Art Center of Corpus Christi. (General Public) (4- 22 -10) Tyler Brown George C. Clark Health and Safety Manager, Turner Industries Group L.L.C. Attended Texas State Technical College. Activities include: Billy Sandifer Annual Beach Clean Up and Sharkathon Annual Fishing Tournament. (General Public) (1- 11 -10) Operations Manager, Suemaur Exploration and Production, LLC. Received BS in Petroleum Engineering from Marietta College, Marietta, Ohio and MBA from Texas A &M University at College Station. Registered Petroleum Engineer. Activities include: Society of Petroleum Engineers, Boy Scouts of America Troop 3, and Chaplain. (Oil Industry) (7- 13 -10) Michael Creacy Issac Gonzales Patrick McCullough Gerard Navarro, Jr. Terry Nelson Gerald Rogen Supervisor/Branch Chief, Corpus Christi Army Depot. Received AAS from Del Mar College and Attending University of Incarnate Word. Activities include: Federal Managers Association and American Heart Association CRP Lifesaver and AED Instructor. Recipient of Achievement Medal for Civilian Service, Special Act or Service Award, Letter /Certificate of Commendation and Boy Scouts of America District Award of Merit for Community Volunteer Awards. (General Public) (5 -7 -10) Customer Service Representative, Signature Flight Support. Attending Del Mar College. (General Public) (5- 11 -10) Exploration Geologist, Suemaur Exploration & Production, LLC. Received a Bachelors of Science from Texas A &M University- Corpus Christi. Activities include: HGS, AAPG, and CCGS. (Gil Industry) (7-6-10) Substitute Teacher, Corpus Christi Independent School District. Currently attending Texas A &M- Corpus Christi. (General Public) (5- 14 -09) Area Production Services Manager, Exterran. Attended South East Missouri State University. Activities include: CC Chapter API. (Oil Industry) (5 -7 -10) Attorney, Self- Employed. Received AS from Enterprise State Jr. College, Enterprise, Alabama, BGS from University of Houston, and JD from Thurgood Marshall School of Law, Texas Southern. (General Public) (5 -7 -10) Guadalupe V. Salinas Administrative Assistant, Pathfinder Energy /Smith International. (General Public) (8- 24 -09) Steve Trubatisky Real Estate Broke- Associate. Realty World Island Properties. Attended Tarleton State University. Stephenville, Texas. Activities include: Corpus Christi Association of Realtors. (General Public) (2-11-09) d. PLANNING COMMISSION — Three (3) vacancies with terms to 7- 31 -13. DUTIES: To make and amend a master plan for the physical development of the City; to recommend to the City Council approval or disapproval of proposed changes in the zoning plan; to exercise control over platting or subdividing land within the corporate limits of the city and within an area extending five miles beyond the City limits; to submit annually to the City Manager not less than 90 days prior to the beginning of the budget year a list of recommended capital improvements which in the opinion of the commission are necessary or desirable during the forthcoming 5 year period; to require information from other departments of the City government in relation to its work; to be responsible to and act as an advisory body to the City Council and to perform such additional duties and exercise such additional powers as may be prescribed by ordinance of the City Council. COMPOSITION: Nine (9) members which shall consist of nine registered voters of the City appointed by the City Council. Elects its own chairman from among its membership at the first regular meeting in August of each year. MEMBERS Mark Adame Rudy Garza, Chair Johnny R. Martinez James Skrobarczyk, Sr. *A. Javier Huerta, Vice -Chair John C. Tamez Evan J. Kelly * Govind B. Nadkarni *John S. Taylor TERM 7 -31 -11 7 -31 -12 7 -31 -11 7 -31 -11 7 -31 -10 7 -31 -12 7 -31 -12 7 -31 -10 7 -31 -10 ORRIGINAL APPTD. DATE 7 -08 -08 2 -22 -05 7 -12 -05 7 -12 -05 7 -26 -05 8 -22 -06 7 -11 -06 7 -10 -07 2 -24 -09 ATTENDANCE RECORD OF MEMBERS SEEKING REAPPOINTMENT NAME A. Javier Huerta Govind B. Nadkarni John S. Taylor NO. OF MTGS. THIS TERM 24 24 24 NO. PRESENT 23(lexc) 22(2exc) 23 Legend *Seeking reappointment **Not seeking reappointment ***Resigned ****Exceeded number of absences allowed by ordinance *****Has met six -year service limitation " % OF ATTENDANCE LAST TERM YEAR 96% 92% 96% OTHER INDIVIDUALS EXPRESSING INTEREST Vicky Jean Alexander Mona Baen Shawn P. Bodine Robert Cagle Gene Clancy Retired Nursing House Supervisor. Driscoll_ Children's Hospital. Received Bachelor of Science from University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas. Activities include: Citizens in Support of the Corpus Christi Police Department and Corpus Christi Police Departments Reorganizational Team. Formerly served on Crime Control and Prevention District, Commission for Children and Youth and Flint Hills Resources Community Action Council. (6 -3 -10) President, Stewart Title. Activities include: Executive Women's International, Rotary Club, and CCAR. (5 -13- 09) Project Manager, Flint Hills Resources. Received BS in Electrical Engineering from Texas A &M University - Kingsville and MBA from University of Utah. Activities include: Texas Society of Professional Engineers, Nueces Chapter. Recipient of Builder of the Year Award (1988). (2-9-10) Vice President of Turnaround Division, Repcon, Inc. Received BS in Engineering Science and Mechanics from North Carolina State University and Masters of Business Administration from Lamar University, Beaumont. Activities include: Member of Rotary Club of Corpus Christi and serves on Marina Advisory Committee, but will resign if appointed to this board. (4-14-09) Design Resource Manager for Construction, Susser Holdings Corporation. Attended Houston Community College. Activities include: National Association of Convenient Stores, Petroleum Equipment Institute, Industry Council on the Environment, and Committee for Clean Texas in Austin- Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Former Board of Adjustments — Chair. (4- 28 -09) Michael Creacy David M. Coover, Jr. Sue Corey Damon Crabtree Carl Crull Robert Andrew Franklin Roland Gaona Supervisor/Branch Chief, Corpus Christi Army Depot. Received an ASS in Electrical/Electronics Technology from Del Mar College and a Degree in Business Management from University of Incarnate Word. Activities include: Federal Managers Association and American Heart Association CRP Lifesaver and AED Instructor. Recipient of Boy Scouts of America District Award of Merit and Achievement medal for Civilian Service, Special Act or Service Award. (5 -7 -10) Self Employed, Attorney. Received BA from St. Mary's University and JD from South Texas College of Law. (4- 16-09) Self - Employed, Registered Accessibility Specialist. Bachelors Degree. Activities include: Texas Registered Accessibility Specialist Association and AHRI Board Members. (7- 13 -09) Vice President, Capital Farm Credit, ACA. Received BS Agriculture Business from Sam Houston State University at Huntsville, Texas. Activities include: Nueces County Junior Livestock Show Agriculture Mechanics Committee. (7- 13 -09) Vice President, HDR Engineering, Inc. Received BS in Civil Engineering and MBA. Activities include: United Way Board. (6- 15-09) Business Analyst/Project Manager, Navy Army Federal Credit Union. Received AS and BS in Business Management from Park University at Parkville, Missouri and MBA in Business Administration from Texas A &M University - Corpus Christi. Recipient of Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal and Achievement Medal. (7- 15 -09) Commercial Realtor, Self - Employed/The Clower Company. Attended College. Activities include: LULAC. (5-27-09) John Garcia Mike Garey Timothy Goss Daniel M. Grimsbo Austin Harbin William Paul Hunt Regional Director of Sales, Candlewood Suites. Attended Del Mar College. Activities include: Hospitality Marketing Association, Harbor Lights Committee Member, and Corpus Christi Hispanic Chamber Member and Embajador. (4-26-10) Preparation Chef, OMNI Hotels. Received degree in Architecture from University of Arkansas and a degree in General Business from Texas A &M University - Corpus Christi. Activities include: Habitat for Humanity. (4 -22- 09) Registered Representative /Agent, New York Life. Former Special Agent with United States Army Intelligence. Received Associates Degree from Harold Washington College, BS in Sociology from University of the State of New York and Master of Public Administration from Troy University. Attended Japanese Language School — Read, Writes, and Speaks Japanese. (4- 21 -09) Utilities Energy Manager, Department of the Navy, NAVFAC SE. Received Bachelor in Civil Engineering from The Citadel at Charleston, South Carolina, Master in Business Organizational Management from University of La Verne, at Point Mugu, California and Master of Urban Planning from University of Illinois. Activities include: Habitat for Humanity, Society of American Military Engineers, American Society of Civil Engineer, and American Planning Association. Recipient of Numerous Military Awards. (7- 10 -09) Table Tender, Carina'( Italian. Attending Del Mar College. Recipient of the National Young Leaders Award and the Eucharistic Cross Bearer Award. (3- 22 -10) Retired, Environmental Engineer. Received a Bachelors Degree in Meteorology from Texas A &M University - College Station. Formerly Served on the Corpus Christi Regional Air Shed Committee. Activities include: Tutoring. (6 -4 -09) William M. Kramer, Jr. Ed A. Lopez Agent, Kramer Insurance Agency. Received Bachelor in Political Science from Texas A &M University- Corpus Christi. (5 -28 -09) Chief Lending Officer, Executive Vice President, Advisory Director, Texas Champion Bank. Received BBA- Finance from Texas A &I University, Kingsville, Texas and Graduate School of Banking from University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin. Activities include: Nueces County Tax Appraisal District Board Member. (4- 16-09) Michelle Mazur- Armstrong Received B.S. from Texas Tech University. Interested in Serving the Community. (3 -3 -09) Peter G. Melve Transportation Supervisor, Regional Transportation Authority. Received an Associate Degree in Social WorkJLiberal Arts and Bachelor's Degree in Business Administration/Management. Activities include: Westside Business Association and Foster Parent. (3 -2 -09) Mary A. "Linda" Maya Human Services Tech., Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. Attended Del Mar College and has a real estate license. Received a Certificate of Appreciation from TXDFP and from Nueces Child Welfare Foundation. (4 -16 -09) Joel S. Mumphord Retired, Encycle, Inc. Served in Law Enforcement. Activities include: Host of T.V. Show, Community Action Agency, Molina Neighborhood Day Care, HIALCO President. (5- 21 -09) Mohamad Omar Joe Ortiz Self - Employed. Received BSC in Electrical Engineering and Master of Science, Doctor of Business Administration. Recipient of Teaching Excellence Award from University of Texas at Austin for Presentations. Texas A &M Corpus Christi Adjunct Professor. (10 -6 -09) Self - Employed, Home Builder. Attended Del Mar College and Granthem University. Activities include: Building Designer Institute, LULAC District 11 and American GI Forum. (8- 26 -09) Keith Parker Richard Pulido Woodrow Mac Sanders Senior Mechanical Engineer, Bath EngineeringJNoresco. Received BS in Mechanical Engineering. Activities include: ASHRAE and AEE. Serves on the CCCIC /Loan Review Committee. (4- 23 -09) Senior Program Manager for IM/IT, SMARTnet, Inc. Formerly Regional Superintendent/7oint Program Director, United States Navy Space and Warfare Command. Received BS, Business Management from Park University and MS Management Graduate Degree at Embry - Riddle University. Retired Chief United States Navy. Activities include: Senior Deacon and Chairman — Master Plan Committee at Real Life Fellowship. (11- 20 -09) Medical Social Worker, Texas Department of State Health Services. Received Bachelor of Arts from Texas A &I University, Kingsville, Master of Science - Psychology /Counseling and Guidance from Corpus Christi State University and Post Masters Degree work toward ED.D. Activities include: Licensed Baccalaureate Social Worker, Adjunct Professor of History at Coastal Bend College, and Board Member of Selective Services System. (4- 24 -09) Amber Sayre Currently Attends Del Mar College, Registered Nurse Program. (10 -6 -09) Sean M. Thorson Steve Trubatisky Sr. Mortgage Banker, Envoy Mortgage. Attended Brigham Young University, University of Texas, and School of Mortgage Lending at Washington State. Previously involved with Pacific Coast Mortgage Dreams, Coaching Girls Youth Soccer Team, and Sno -King Youth Club. (6- 2-09) Real Estate Broker Associate, Realty World Island Properties. Attended TarTeton State University, Stephenville, Texas. Activities include: Corpus Christi Association of Realtors. (2-11-09) John T. Tucker Waylon D. West Larry L. White Marsha Williams Owner, John Tucker Homes. Attended Corpus Christi State University and University of Texas in Austin. Activities include: Member of Unified Development Codes, Board of Director for National Association of Home Builders, and Past President of Builders Association of Corpus Christi. (5 -5 -09) Senior Designer, Maverick Engineering, Received AA from Eastern Arizona College. Activities include: Bayfest Volunteer. (5- 22 -09) Process Engineer, DuPont. Received BS and MS from Louisiana Tech and MS from Memphis State. Activities include: American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Corpus Christi Bucarader, and Water's Edge Pipe and Drum Band. (6 -5 -09) Realtor, Re/Max Metro Properties. Received B.A. in Business from Texas A & I University Kingsville. Active member of the Kiwanis Club and the Re/Max Lifetime Hall of Fame. (4-17-09) 3 Requested Council Action: 7/20110 Alternate Date: 7127110 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM RECOMMENDATION: Motion approving the purchase of four (4) heavy trucks in the amount of $528,822; and the lease purchase of three (3) heavy trucks in the amount of $246,533 for a grand total of $775,355.00. The equipment is awarded to the following companies for the following amounts in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI- 0160 -10 based on low bid meeting specifications and low bid. The heavy trucks will be used by the Street, Water, and Wastewater Departments. All units are replacements to the fleet. Funding for the purchase of the heavy trucks is available in the Capital Outlay Budget of the Maintenance Services Fund. Financing for the lease purchase of the heavy trucks will be provided through the City's lease/purchase financing contractor. Corpus Christi Freigh Corpus Christi, TX Items 1, 2, 3, & 4 $669,095.00 tliner, Western Star SanTex Truck Center San Antonio, TX Item 5 $106,260.00 Grand Total: $775,355.00 ****************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Purpose: Bid Invitations Issued: Nine Bids Received: Award Basis: Price Comparison: Funding: The heavy trucks will be used by the Street, Water, and Wastewater Departments. All units are replacements to the fleet. Replaced units are evaluated for potential reallocation to other departments and/or disposed of through the City's standard surplus disposal procedures, including online and live auctions of vehicles. Street Department will utilize the dump trucks in their asphalt operations to haul road construction/maintenance materials, such as hot mix, limestone base and trap rock, to and from job sites. They will also be used in utility cuts, base failure, and rework and seal coating operations. The Water Department will use the heavy trucks to haul debris associated with water main break repairs. The heavy trucks purchased for Wastewater will be used to transport biosolids and sludge from the wastewater treatment plants to the sanitary landfill for disposal. Five Low Bid — Bid items 2, 3, 4 & 5 Low Bid Meeting Specifications — Bid item 1 Grande Ford Truck Center, Corpus Christi, Texas submitted the apparent low bid for line item 1. However, their offer does not meet specification requirements regarding engine torque, as required in the bid invitation. Compared to like items purchased over the past two years, pricing has increased approximately 14.71%. Purchase of Heavy Trucks — Bid Items 3, 4, & 5 — Four (43 trucks Maintenance Services Fund 550200- 5110 40120 $528,822.00 Capital Outlay No's.: A -53, A-68, A -72 & A -S0 Bid Items No's: 3, 4, & 5 TOTAL AMOUNT: $528,822.00 -37- Requested Council Action: 7/20/10 Alternate Date: 7/27/10 Lease Purchase of Heavy Trucks - Bid Items 1 & 2 — Three (3) trucks Funding is provided through the City's lease /purchase financing agreement for a sixty-month period. The estimated interest rate is 3.5 %. The actual interest rate will be determined after acceptance of the vehicles. The estimated annual payment is $53,818.44. Total estimated cost over the sixty -month period, including principal of $246,533.00 and interest of $22,559.20, is $269,092.20. Street Department FY 09 -10 530190- 1020 -12430 $0 Capital Outlay No's.: A -13, A -14 Bid Items No's: 1 & 2 The heavy trucks are scheduled for delivery December 2010. As such, no monies from this fiscal year are required to support this award. Funds have been requested for FY2010/2011. Michae Barrera Assistant Director of Fin • cial Services E -mail: mikeb @cctexas.com 826 -3169 ¥ ro NOLLdI8OS3C co 0 k P 0 \2 z X/j �)z § 0 — h) _, iv o il f m % m % m E m % e 4 \ 8 \ --4 8 _§ $ 8 ri \ 8 ro crr 8 $ E 9 8 « \ 8 \ B 0.& 2 = �E I Corpus Christi Freightliner, Western Star Cor s Christi; Texas S a k 8 j § # j 8 § $ 8 - j $ 8 % # rD 8 _ $ @ S ] § 8 t § a Unit Extended i Price Price SanTex Truck Center, LTD San Antonio, Texas $ n 0 8 / o 2 o a 2 2 0 a 0 I K I n a, $ 8 04 k 4, -17c [& m 7k �k Grande Ford Truck Sales, Inc. San Antonio, Texas _� o c E k § 8 ° - / ) 8 ) K e - / 8 ) S § ) 8 k ) \ R ,-,7'. � n3 T. French- Ellison Truck Center Corpus Christi, Texas $ 8 r4I \ 8 \ \ S 4. :4 2 8 k § B $ ° —3 k S § 8 * § 8 k % Unit Extended Price Price Rush Truck Center, Houston Houston, Texas co 0 k P 0 \2 z X/j �)z § 0 4 Requested Council Action 07/20/10 Alternate Date 07/27/10 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM RECOMMENDATION: Motion approving the purchase of one hundred and fifty (150) units of soft body armor from Nardis, Inc., San Antonio, Texas in accordance with Bid Invitation No. BI- 0048 -10 based on best value for a total amount of $94,050. Funds are available from the Edward Byrne Justice Assistance Grant in the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund. ****************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** BACKGROUND: Purpose: The body armor vests will be used by field officers working routine patrol. The weight and size of the vests are an important factor in the ability of the officer to maneuver in the field when performing their duties. All field officers were given the opportunity to rate each vest in regards to the above two metrics and scored the "Point Blank All" vest bid by Nardis, Inc. as the equipment of choice. Bid Invitations Issued: Twenty Bids Received: Nine Famous Uniforms, of Corpus Christi, Texas submitted a bid; however, their offer has been deemed as non - responsive for failure to meet the specification requirements of the National Institute of Justice Standard for bullet- resistant body armor. Award Basis: Best Value Funding Police Department The evaluation team, comprised of team members from the Police Department developed a matrix of the evaluation criteria. The evaluation criteria components set forth in the proposal included: (1) Price 30 %, (2) Weight 20 %, (3) Comfort/Wear ability 20 %, (4) Lead Time 15 %, and (5) Bidders Profile and Qualifications 15 %. The evaluation team reviewed each bid proposal response and completed the evaluation matrix. The rankings of the field officers who are required to wear the vests make up 40% of the overall scores given to each bidder. As a result of the evaluation, the team has selected Nardis, Inc., as the best valued supplier for this service. 520090 -1061- 00000 - 820809 1 Michae Barrera Assistant Director of Financial Services (361) 826 -3169 mikeb @cctexas.com Total Amount: —43— FY2009 -2010 $94,050.00 $94,050.00 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI SUMMARY EVALUATION MATRIX - SOFT BODY ARMOR B1 -0048 -10 Evaluation Criteria Maximum Points Nerdis Public Safety San Antonio, Texas Manny Trevino Enterprises San Antonio, Texas First Choice Armor Spindale, North Carc4na Galls Lexington, Kentucky Price 30 points 18.13 30 23.21 21.97 (1) Weight 20 points 20 14 18 19 (1) ComfortlWear ability 20 points 18 10 16 14 Lead Time 15 points 15 15 14 15 Bidder's Profile 8 Qualifications 15 ports 15 1 15 10 10 SCORE 86.13 84 81.21 79.97 TOTAL AMOUNT $94,050.00 $56,850.00 $73,485.00 $77,638.50 Evaluation Criteria Maximum Points Tactical Gear Now, Inc Richardson, Texas Galls Lexington, Kentucky Protective Products Intl Sunrise, Florida G.T. Distributors Austin, Texas Price 30 points 19.05 22.18 21.29 19.06 (1) Weight 20 points 15 17 17 16 (1) Comfort/Wear ability 20 points 20 12 8 10 Lead Time 15 points 14 15 15 14 Bidder's Profile & Qualifications 15 points 10 10 10 11 SCORE 78.05 76.18 71.29 70.06 TOTAL AMOUNT $89,505.00 $76,888.50 $80,100.00 $89,476.50 {1) The weight and size of the vests are an important factor in the ability of the officer to maneuver in the field when performing their duties. All field officers were given the opportunity to rate each vest in regards to the above two metrics and scored the "Point Blank AI'T' vest bid by Nardis, Inc. as the equipment of choice. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: 07/20/2010 AGENDA ITEM: Motion approving the purchase of hardware, software, and services to upgrade the Port Aransas and Packery Channel 800 Mhz radio sites to Project 25 capable systems from Dailey & Wells Communications, San Antonio, Texas based on sole source for a total expenditure of $113,400. Funds are available through the Public Safety Interoperable Communications Grant. ISSUE: Purchase of equipment must be approved by City Council if over $50,000. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Police Department will use the funds to upgrade the existing trunked radio system to meet the State of Texas mandated P -25 compliance. What is known as the Project 25" (P25) digital "suite of standards" is that any manufacturer's radios that are "P25 compliant" can communicate with any other vendor radios that have the same certification and operate in the same radio frequency band (VHF, UHF, 700/800 MHz are the three primary bands — Texas will be primarily using VHF and 700/800 MHz). Currently during times of crisis, such as a hurricane hit to Corpus Christi, incoming outside federal, state, and other mutual aid units will not be able to communicate on the Corpus Christi system. The Texas Statewide Communications Interoperability Plan (SLIP) — adopted by the Governor's Office on 11/26107 and approved by U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security on 4/4/08, requires Texas public safety agencies to be fully Project 25 standards -based shared systems" (P25) compliant by January 1, 2015, or risk losing federal and state grant funding. This purchase will enhance the continuing efforts to upgrade the Port Aransas and Packery Channel 800 MHz public Safety Radio Sites to Project 25 compliance. These are two repeater sites that must be connected to the Integrated multisite coordinator computer at the Police headquarters. The other 3 repeater sites are already connected. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of purchase. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: Acceptance and appropriation of the grant on 01/19/2010. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of purchase. D. Troy Riggs Chief of Police 886 -2604 Attachments: Quotation from Dailey Wells Date: June 21, 2010 Project Name: Project Owner: Project Vendor: STATEMENT OF WORK Corpus Christi P25 Site Upgrades City of Corpus Christi, Texas (CCC) Don Nattinger (361)886 -2829 DNartra CCteN7s.con; Dailey & Wells Communications, Inc. (DWC) 3440 E. Houston St. San Antonio, Texas 78219 Richard Wells (210)893 -6501 RSV-ti HARRIS. GS This Statement of Work contains: • System Description • Vendor and Customer Responsibilities • Project Schedule & Milestone Gantt • System Cost Proposal Svstem Description DWC will provide all parts, labor, installation, and manufacturer's warranty in upgrading the Port Aransas and Packery Channel sites to Project 25 Capable systems. Vendor Responsibilities • Provide all hardware and services as listed on the attached System Cost Proposal • Receive Equipment, test, and inventory • Upgrade the Port Aransas and Packery Channel Sites • Provide the manufacture's testing and warranty services Customer Responsibilities • Provide access to the radio sites as required • Provide any required permits, licensing, or other authorizations to implement and operate all hardware and services as listed on the attached System Cost Proposal. • Provide any necessary programming of field radio units to operate on the hardware and services as listed on the attached System Cost Proposal. assure dcommun►ca tionsvw ©AILEY -WELL Pro'ect Schedul Milestone G i =PUS dwIIEmows - .0 11.1 k � .1.423.18 iael,ll Pao 1.91 Aali.'I adkar F . Mop llia7VN1 114.1411398 F 7 Ram' oil Reveled Ws Cq 11 Cow Res /dys 1630,411 Nn MO 4 3 Place Ciders r limns Fadrg Id, lien /All lin WI Nioduaie Ffepart 11 to Tee /ANI 11ee2A Olt 5 IIut mdse adry. %OWN rrNW11. D 4 1 Lima&Polor1 Cool *Or lo Pa opt} 7168 To 2!2S71 Nn Mill _ -1 -- Oral' Pot Amos *Wont P75 agMe 71616 To Mill Nn vont r _ - -. - ! Fl lacep4Na tag Nr IM,N Id= WW* W Simi NMDwmNak. 5dor - No 5000 NeiMlnl v it %6i. Fe11F1.m: Ge. IS moons,* woo/Try 4 11 hest lli1116+arodsNa I6p NmIM1NN Nasom 1 0 17 AWAaghre Idei N3 8I SN Nn Y11Al 0 Submitted as Original, 'Richard Wells Dailey & Wells Communications, Inc. RWin;HARRIS.GS Phone: (210)893 -6501 Fax (210)893 -6590 assure dcommunica tlons� s p so ao V co 1 LTI w N -• vi z �._ 3 FITPori Aransas 1 F: C11 A CO A N A -s CO o W C1C 63 V i31 W A W W W A) W i W o N tp A3 co R1 V H 'T. A 1 ._. ns - v. Y C; 5" N IV N --+ i A A A ;ITEPRO P25 UPGRADE (Includes following items) QTY f MODEL NO. 1 DESCRIPTION 4 m y . P25 TEST UNI MASA -NPS9V SXCLIF CABLE,ETHERNET HUB,I5FT SXCL1E CABLE,ETHERNET HUB,10FT sxCUC KIT,CABLE,SitePro STATION #3 & #4 SXCLIA KIT,CABLE,SitePro STATION #1 SXCL1B KIT,CABLE,SitePro STATION #2 SXCL3N Cable,SitePro Controller Shelf sxMDSG Kit,9600 Baud Modem/FTMIC Module MASX -NDF2Q Kit,Ethernet Hub,24 Port SXMD5X KIT,SitePro CONTROLLER MMOO1SA MANUAL,INSTLIMAINT,SITE 1NTF MODULE(SIM) SXCH5U PANEL,SYSTEM,SitePro W SIM SAC.i7A CABLE,POWER,120VAC SASIM1 j CONTROL UNIT,SIM,FOR USE WITH MASTR III KIT,SureCall LINK CARD Kit,SureCall,Shelf Assembly Cabie,M7100 TU Mobile, M7100- IP,806-870MHz,35W Feature Set,Test Unit T UPGRADE (Includes following Items) Power Supply,120VAC,60Hz,12VDC $ 2,515.00 $ 1,105.00 $ 255.00' $ 1,790.00 $ 1,935.00 in EA GI o p CS C G iA -} p C $ 53.00 $ 65.00 $ 775.00 $ 530.00 $ 4,980.00 $ 95.00 $ 1,330.00 $ 115.00 $ 115,00 EA 8 R] 0 Q C z z 71 = m in -A 13 .CW11 0 EA ■ �1 O 0 69 11.3 _th 0 69 —• i .(011 00 EA N at CA 0 EA iA .a. o 0 0 0 F$ 230.00 1 fA EA 69 EA 69 49 69 6A 69 C11 to i - [C1) C ❑1 01 Q Q o ,Q. _u1i1 91 w 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 69 4 a 0 a g m a ° 0 101 o o 0 f 0 c 01 0 "c 111 0 0 0 1 c 1' 0 010101 ,1 c0 i' ' 0 c ' 0 0 . e e e e e c%' e m 0" PRICE 69 -A C11 i %TI iA .A - A% iA CD jib (71 69 N C.TI 69 i CO CYi LT1 17-7-07g7 EA 69 1,3 01 p) p (11 0 633 ryr V7 01 $ 39.75 $ 65.00 $ 581.25 $ 397.50 $ 3,735.06 $ 71.25 $ 997.50 $ 86.25 $ 86.25 49 i T1 fp QQ G7 2 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o Q Q 0 0 0 0 0 _- n ' $ 1,886.25 $ 828.75 $ 191.25 $ 1,342.50 _$ 1,451.25 1 EA 69 p N 8 0 0 1 $ 172.50 1 69 69 69 64 69 613 EA H EA 8R88389=123.81=88 W A _ (T1 C�i1 C 7 8 v • r�sr a9 +A 1t) app Q Q1 Q$ N N (71 8 52 55 m em 3 8 $ 69 643 m▪ y d • r 1 1 T I� o 69 69 '!d !�uld Et 3 C▪ D 2 N W i 6A 8.w Y1 0 0 fig i 8 0 0 fA 0 0 0 0 EA 0 0 cn 0 Q i 0 0 En ID U7 0 69 CD fy� 0 0 69 Eft Q 8 X1 N (0 a= Fa 41 I 0 1 rta L I i- m ;3 hf 0 i A I certify that, to my knowledge, the information contained herein is true and accurate tdial 133road G) 0 -4 0 G V V i m 5 «CIdtoi ens c«1 Q!LoJ. ens 44 tai 0) cr1 v1 N s 64 4:9 v x N b 0 64 0 0 0 0 10 giro N y d Fif 8 ga 0 69 69 MP 0-0 Ca 0 a 0 00)-100) 0i3 00 a3 C co nn? -v a) a) N3 r r D. a �aaF 0 0 c M c a 64 69 69 49 64 g00 0 0 0 00 00 [0TI Ea 69 69 fft fft 88cP 91 V1 O th G ogg 00 00 r°h Ni C71 CA aag 69 64 69 fle•En 2 A co al O W 0 g8 0 0 0 0 0 69 69 A A g 0) 0 0 m R .i 0) 0 0 to H9 fA iA FA 0 0 0 UII J 6 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: 7/20/2090 AGENDA ITEM: Motion approving the purchase of one (1) 2010 Dodge 3500D ambulance from Dallas Dodge Chrysler Jeep of Dallas, Texas for the total amount of $115,000. The award is based on the cooperative purchasing agreement with the Houston Galveston Area Council (H -GAC). This ambulance will be used to replace Medic Unit 2 which was in an accident and damaged beyond repair. Funds for the purchase of the ambulance are in the FY2009 -2010 Fire Department Operating Budget. ISSUE: The new ambulance will replace Medic Unit 2 which was in a recent accident and damaged beyond repair. The purchase of this unit is a necessary replacement to the fleet to insure adequate response capability. A reserve unit is currently being used as Medic Unit 2's replacement. The reserve unit has over 122,000 miles. This is an emergency purchase and will be delivered within two to three weeks. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Council approval. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: None CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the purchase of a new ambulance in the amount of $115,000.00 to replace Medic Unit 2. Attachments 1. Bid Proposal 2. Warranty Statement —55— Richard Hooks Fire Chief RLF1@cctexas.com (361) 826 -3932 H-GAC CUSTOMIZE PRODUCT PRICING SUMMARY BASED ON CONTRACT ... AM04-08 Quote #8529A -HGAC End ua•rCity of Corpus Christi Address: Contact: Phone: ■ Emie Villareal Fax:[ ■ Vendor. 1 Date: 1 July 12, 2010 Address: Contact: Phone: Dallas Dodge Chrysler Jeep 1150 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, TX 75238 Steve Domak 281-631-3507 Product Description Type 112' on Dodge Ram 3500 Diesel DRW !Chassis, Gen Pwrd Mod Exterior Color White Interior Color Gray A: Bid Series and Base Price In Bid Proposal HAO5 Base Bid Price B: Published Orations: lltemize each Item below bode PUBLISHED OPTIONS iNd Prim , 26 Granning air suspension system $5,000.00 8 Paint Type I or Type Ill 12' Module and chassis two -tone $3,500.00 1500.00 $1,700.00 174 Squad bench cabinet with padding on the end - 19 Buell dual 10" and 12" air hams with compressor 217 Single 10" 3M reflective stripe with non - reflective pinstripe and basic reflective lettering $1,900.00 212 3M diamond grade conspiculty tape in Chevron pattern on rear of module including entry doors $1,400.00 otal of Published Options (Line 'BP) y $14,000.00 I ase Bid Price (Line 'A') $100,000.00 TOTAL of 'A' and 'B' ' 114 000.00 C: UNPUBLISHED OPTIONS jltemlze each item below] NOT to Exceed + 25% of 'A" +13' Total $ a 0.000% UNPUBLISHED OPTIONS Price TOTAL of C' = Unpublished Options to be added to BASE PRICE ••••r - $- TOTAL of'A'.'B' &'C' = $114,000.00 D: Contract Price Adjustments !Explain Here) Stock Fee & Lot Ins. 0 days t 0.0000% 5- E: Other Charges [Explain Here) F: TOTAL of + •C' +'D' +'E' . 'F' $114,000.00 $- G: QuanIty Ordered [NUMBER of UNITS] H: H-GAC Administrative Fee I: Non Equipment Charges & Credits X F = $114,000.00 51,000.00 PER P. O. J: TOTAL PURCHASE PRICE INCLUDING H-GAC ADMIN. FEE -I-- $115,000.00 ACCEPTED BY: Please make your purchase order out to Dallas Dodge Chrysler Jeep (1150 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, TX 75238). Please email a copy of your purchase order and this quote to Steve Dornak with Dallas Dodge at sdornak@swbell.net, La Wanda James with HGAC at lawanda.james @h- gac.com, and to Laura Richardson at Irichardson@frazerbilt.com FRAZER H4 t]4i°.:.'rakv. Pi}.3►.i+c L''it EMi Warranty Statement Frazer, Ltd. warrants its module against failure or malfunction due to design, construction, or installation errors, defective workmanship, and missing or incorrect parts for the life of the module, as long as it is in the possession of the original owner. Frazer, Ltd. warrants pieces and parts furnished by others and installed on the module for the period designated by the piece/ part manufacturer. Frazer, Ltd. warrants its electrical system wiring against defects, shorts, and malfunctions for the life of the module as long as it is in possession of the original owner. This warranty specifically does not include components in the electrical system beyond one year unless a longer warranty is provided by the component manufacturer. Bulbs, fixtures, switches, relays, all truck related electrical systems, generator set, and other components are not covered beyond the warranty provided by the manufacturer. This warranty does not cover abuse, neglect, accident damage, normal adjustments, tampering, modifications, and unauthorized hook -ups for radios and various charging equipment, The following parts carry manufacturers warranties: Onan generator AAP- Dometic /Cru isair air conditioner /heater Whelen and/ or Federal Signal LEDs Unipower power supply Progressive Dynamics battery charger IMPACT suction Paint Warranty 2 years or 2000 hours 4 years parts & labor 5 years 2 years from date of manufacture 1 year 1 year 4 years 0E3V/115710H 2 Yr! 24.000 WAR RANTY COVERAGE AT ALAJ 3Yrl 3 Yet 3 Yri 5 Yr: SO, ik*rtd 18G, Kam arranty •OVeriseff Pe.forairiai Lpm,t Waryamy: Ail Nam* notee 1...664k Ctimmina nicrei Kr Mill* (err-moms Wammr.y AiaO: 6 Sperd Atr 66st* Transrnislion Lisaited Warranty try • Kahl. Duty 3 SA? Mew! Sarj Nati ca.iirenia iimirsinn 'Warranty MC* Diesel - Sburi Tom - Specified Comp. 000 Flikori • Si.vsri Tam - Specilie4 Comp. Ctlifonzia Emission - Mewl. Louv Tarn Naise Emission Warranty - navy Duly 7 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: 7/20/2010 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution to authorize the City Manager or designee to execute a lease agreement with Del Mar College for 2,310 square feet of office and classroom space at Del Mar College West Campus to be used to provide administrative and instructional support to the Fire Academy, for annual rental payment of $40,000, subject to automatic annual renewals. ISSUE: In 2008 the Fire Department entered into a lease agreement with Del Mar College to provide administrative and instructional space at the West Campus location. This allowed the Fire Department to consolidate training into one location. The lease agreement is now up for renewal. The lease agreement for $40,000 will provide 2,310 square feet of space for offices and storage on the campus in which a state of the art Fire Training facility is located. The lease amount also includes 24 -hour security, utilities, parking, maintenance, and janitorial services. The term of the agreement is for one year beginning July 15, 2010 and continuing through July 14, 2011. This agreement shall automatically renew annually, unless one of the participating parties provides a written notice of termination to the other party at least (30) days prior to the expiration of each annual term. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Council approval is required to authorize the City Manager to execute a one -year lease agreement with Del Mar College for office space on the Del Mar West Campus. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: None CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends authorizing the City Manger to execute a one -year Lease Agreement with Del Mar College for office space on the Del Mar West Campus. Attachments 1. Lease Agreement 2. Resolution —61— Richard Hooks Fire Chief RLH @cctexas.com (361) 826 -3932 LEASE AGREEMENT Del Mar College District, (called "Lessor" herein), a political subdivision of the State of Texas, located at 101 Baldwin, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas, 78404, and the City of Corpus Christi, a municipal corporation and home -rule city of the State of Texas, acting by and through its governing body, the City Council, for the Corpus Christi Fire Department, located at 406 Leopard, Suite #300, Corpus Christi, Texas, 78408 (called "Lessee" herein). WHEREAS the Lessor and Lessee had previously entered into a lease agreement for a term of one year which expired on July 14, 2009, and Lessee has been on a month-to -month lease since July 15, 2009. WHEREAS the Lessor and Lessee agree to renew the lease agreement for an additional term of one year with an option to renew annually. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants in this agreement, the Lessor and Lessee, authorized by appropriate actions of their governing bodies, hereby agree as follows: 1. Purpose of Agreement: The Lessor agrees to provide Lessee with 2, 310 square feet of space on the Del Mar College West Campus (called "space" or "leased premises" herein) for the purpose of providing administrative and instructional support to the Fire Academy in the Public Safety program. 2. Consideration for Use of Space: In consideration for the use of the space to be provided by the Lessor, the Lessee shall pay to the Lessor an annual rent in the amount of $40,000, payable in monthly installments of $3,333.33. This amount includes the following services: 24 -hour campus -wide security, utilities (water/electricity/gas/sewer), and utilization ofparking areas (excluding reserved parking which may be available—at current rates). In addition, accounts will be established by the Lessor for the telephone, fax, and internet connections utilized by the Lessee. Lessee shall pay for all charges within 10 days after being notified by the Lessor. Lessee shall be provided with a copy of the policies of the Lessor at the inception of occupancy and all Lessee employees shall be expressly subject to and agree to abide by the policies of the Lessor. The policies include, but are not limited to, the following: safe work place (5.72), smoking (5.73), drugs and alcohol (5.74), professional working environment (5.75), sexual harassment (5.76), and computer utilization (3.2). Violation of the District's policies by the Lessee or any of its employees will be grounds for immediate termination of this Lease Agreement. 3. Term of this Lease Agreement: This Lease Agreement shall be for a term of one year beginning July 15, 2010, and continuing through July 14, 2011. This Agreement shall automatically renew annually, unless one of the participating parties provides a written notice of termination to the other party at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of each annual term. The City Manager is authorized to execute any and all subsequent renewals and/or amendments to this Agreement. 4. Space to be Provided: During the term of this Lease Agreement, the Lessor will provide 2,310 square feet of space on the Del Mar College West Campus to Lessee_ The space provided will be designated at the sole discretion of the Lessor, and Lessee must use the provided space for the intended purpose related to the Fire Academy training. Space shall be made available for use by the Lessee in accordance with the policies and guidelines promulgated by the Lessor, including, but not limited to, regular operating hours and the unavailability of space during prescribed holidays as established by the Lessor. 5. Basic Services, Maintenance and Repair: In addition to the space provided by the Lessor, the Lessor will provide janitorial and other maintenance services for the upkeep of the leased premises. The Lessor will provide hot and 2ald water for the general use in the facilities, heat or air conditioning during normal business hours, routine maintenance of electric lighting and replacement of light bulbs. 6. Insurance: Subject to limits provided by Texas Tort Claims Act, Lessee, at its sole cost, must procure and maintain at least the following insurance coverage throughout the term of this Lease Agreement: a. Commercial General Liability (CGL): The CGL liability insurance (also known as broad from comprehensive general liability insurance) shall insure Lessee against liability for bodily injury, property damages (include loss of use of property), and personal injury arising out of the operation, use, or occupancy of the Leased Premises. The insurance policy must provide coverage in an amount not less than ONE MILLION AND NO /100 DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) per occurrenceNowithstanding the foregoing sentence, the Lessee may meets its insurance obligations through self - insurance and excess general liability insurance coverage. b. Property Insurance: Broadest available property insurance for 100% of the replacement cost of Lessee's furniture, fixtures, equipment and other property. Lessor will not be responsible for the loss or damage to Lessee's property. c. Proof of Insurance: Lessee may present a certificate of - insurance as proof of required insurance coverage for property and excess liability coverage, and a letter confirming self-insurance status for primary CGL. . Upon reasonable request, Lessee further agrees to provide Lessor with either copies or opportunity for inspection of all insurance policies required hereinto upon taking occupancy of the leased premises. 7. Indemnities and Waivers; To the extent permitted by law, Lessee shall indemniA, Lessor against and hold Lessor harmless from any and all costs, claims, or liability proximately caused by the acts or omissions of Lessee, including the negligence, gross negligence, or intentional misconduct of the Lessee or any of its employees; any breach or default in the performance of Lessee's obligations under this Lease Agreement; or, any misrepresentation or breach of warranty by Lessee under this Lease Agreement. Lessor shall not be liable to Lessee for any liability or loss arising out of or in connection with any criminal activity or damage or injury to persons or property caused by persons gaining access to the leased premises, except where caused in whole or part by Lessor 's negligence. In addition, to the extent permitted by law, Lessee indemnifies and holds Lessor harmless against any and all liability or loss to Lessee directly related to any criminal activity or damage or injury to persons or property caused by persons gaining access to the premises, but only to the extent proximately caused by the sole negligence or intentional misconduct of Lessee. S. SiEns: Lessee may not place any signs in or around the leased premises without the Lessor's prior consent, which consent may be withheld or conditioned by Lessor at Lessor's sole and absolute discretion. 9. Termination Notice: Either party may terminate this Lease Agreement by giving 30 days written notice of such proposed termination. If the Lessor or Lessee elects to terminate this Lease Agreement, or the Interlocal Agreement between Del Mar College and the City of Corpus Christi is terminated, or if any of the terms of this Lease Agreement are not honored, written notice of termination will be provided to all parties immediately and the Lessee will vacate the premises within 30 days. AGREED: DEL MAR COLLEGE DISTRICT dr' By: �"� ' Mark Escamiila, Ph.D., President CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Date: By: Date: Angel R. Escobar, City Manager CORPUS CHRISTI FIRE DEPARTMENT By: Richard Hooks, Fire Chief By: T. Trisha Dang Assistant City Attorney For the City Attorney Date: Date: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH DEL MAR COLLEGE FOR 2,310 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE AND CLASSROOM SPACE AT DEL MAR COLLEGE WEST CAMPUS TO BE USED TO PROVIDE ADMINISTRATIVE AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT TO THE FIRE ACADEMY, FOR ANNUAL RENTAL PAYMENT OF $40,000, SUBJECT TO AUTOMATIC ANNUAL RENEWALS. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the City Manager, or his designee, is authorized to execute a lease agreement with Del Mar College for 2,310 square feet of office and classroom space at Del Mar College West Campus to be used to provide administrative and instructional support to the fire academy, for annual rental payment of $40,000, subject to automatic annual renewals. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: July 8, 2010 C1 T. Trisha Dang Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney Joe Adame Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas 2 of , 2010 The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott 8 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: July 20, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: A. Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to submit a grant application, for the Solid Waste Operations department, in the amount of $25,000, to the Coastal Bend Council of Governments for recycling and anti -litter education and to execute all related documents. B. Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to submit a grant application, for the Neighborhood Services Department, in the amount of $31,000, to the Coastal Bend Council of Governments to fund a tire recycling event, an advertising and educational campaign to promote proper disposal of tires and to execute all related documents. C. Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to submit a grant application in the amount of $5,000, to the Coastal Bend Council of Governments for projects sponsored by Advisory Committee on Community Pride and Clean City Advisory Committee, to fund cleanup, beautification and recycling events, and to execute all related documents. ISSUE: A. The Coastal Bend Council of Governments' Regional Solid Waste Grant application process requires approval by the governing body to submit a grant application for a Regional Solid Waste Grants Program grant. If the grant is awarded, the Solid Waste Operations department funds will be applied to advertising and educational materials to promote the City's new recycling program, and to provide funding for the holiday card and Christmas tree recycling programs. B. The Coastal Bend Council of Governments' Regional Solid Waste Grant application process requires approval by the governing body to submit a grant application for a Regional Solid Waste Grants Program grant. If the grant is awarded, funds will be applied to a tire recycling event, to advertising and educational materials to promote citizen awareness, proper disposal, and reduce the amount of illegally dumped tires and other debris. C. The Coastal Bend Council of Governments' Regional Solid Waste Grant application process requires approval by the governing body to submit a grant application for a Regional Solid Waste Grants Program grant. If the grant is awarded, funds will be applied to future clean up and beautification events, including purchasing additional mobile recycling units and t- shirts. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of resolutions. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: October 13, 2009, authorization to accept a $35,000 grant from the Coastal Bend Council of Governments and appropriation of $35,000 to provide recycling and anti -litter education. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the resolutions to submit the three grant applications as requested. L rence Mikolajczyk, ■ r `ctor Solid Waste Operations LawM (§cctexas.com 361 -826 -1972 N Angela M. Rowe, Coordinator PRIDE/Clean City/Mayor's Fitness Council Ang ei a M R(g cctexa s. co m 361 - 826 -3673 Eddie Ortega, Director d Neighborhood Services EddieO @cctexas.com 361 - 826 -3234 BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Grants are administered locally through the Coastal Bend Council of Governments (CBCOG). The purpose of the grant program is to provide funding for eligible local and regional municipal solid waste projects in support of the adopted regional solid waste management plan for the CBCOG region. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 -2003, Solid Waste Services received a total of $125,000 for the following: $45,000 for Household Hazardous Waste Disposal costs, $55,000 for a Brush Loader, $10,000 for a Recycling Media/Outreach Program, $10,000 for a Household Hazardous Waste Media/Outreach Program, and $5,000 to publicize and increase participation in Stop Trashing Corpus Christi Community Clean -up events. In FY 2003 -2004, Solid Waste Services received a total of $56,932 for the following: $46,932 for Solid Waste Local Enforcement, and $10,000 for Litter and Illegal Dumping Cleanup programs. In FY 2004 -05, Solid Waste Services received a total of $38,619 for the following: $26,619 for Solid Waste Local Enforcement, $2,000 for Education and Training, and $10,000 for Litter and Illegal Dumping Cleanup Programs. In FY 2005 -06, Solid Waste Services received a total of $44,880 for the following: $10,000 for a Community Media Outreach campaign for the City's Anti-Litter Ordinance, $10,380 for a third year of funding for an Assistant Compliance Officer, $4,500 for the disposal of scrap tires collected during the City's Neighborhood Initiative Program, and $20,000 to purchase new collection units for the used oil and HHW storage modules for the new Collection/Transfer Station at the J.C. Elliott Landfill. In FY 2006 -2007, Solid Waste Services received a total of $15,000 for recycling and anti - litter education. In FY 2007 -2008, Solid Waste Services received a total $31,120 for the following: $25,000 for recycling and anti- litter education, and $6,120 for household hazardous waste education materials and guides. In FY 2008 -09, Solid Waste Services received a total of $31,000 to provide recycling and anti -litter education. Due to the common theme of education, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality combined the City's two approved grants applications, one for $25,000 and one for $6,000, under one contract. The contract is amended by adding $2,140 to supplement the purchase of three recycling containers for the marina, for a total amount of $33,140. In FY 2009 -10, Solid Waste Operations received a total of $35,000 to fund the recycling billboard campaign, and purchase recycling giveaway items, pine seedlings for Christmas tree recycling program, and Up2U bags to help prevent litter on area beaches. FY 2010 -11 is the first year Neighborhood Services and PRIDE/Clean Cities will submit a separate application for The Coastal Bend Council of Governments' Regional Solid Waste Grant. Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT GRANT APPLICATION, FOR THE SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT, IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000, TO THE COASTAL BEND COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS FOR RECYCLING AND ANTI - LITTER EDUCATION, AND TO EXECUTE ALL RELATED DOCUMENTS. Whereas, the Coastal Bend Council of Governments ('CBCOG ") is directed by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to administer solid waste grant funds for implementation of the CBCOG's adopted regional solid waste management plan; and Whereas, the City of Corpus Christi, Texas is qualified to apply for grant funds under the Request for Applications of the Regional Solid Waste Grants Program; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Director of Solid Waste or designee is authorized to request grant funding under the Coastal Bend Council of Governments Request for Applications of the Regional Solid Waste Grants Program for the Solid Waste Operations Department in the amount of $25,000 for recycling and anti - litter education; and act on behalf of City of Corpus Christi in all matters related to the grant application and any subsequent grant contract and grant project that may result. The Director of Solid Waste or designee is authorized to execute all documents related to the grant application. SECTION 2. That if the projects are funded, City of Corpus Christi, Texas will comply with the applicable grant requirements of the CBCOG, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, and the State of Texas. SECTION 3. That the grant funds and any grant- funded equipment or facilities will be used only for the purposes for which they are intended under the grant. SECTION 4. That the activities will comply with and support the adopted regional and local solid waste management plans adopted for the geographical area in which the activities are performed. ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary Approved: Z. , 2010 Lisa Aguilar sistant City Attorney for the City Attorney CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Joe Adame Mayor H:1LEG- DIR1Lisa12014 Resolutions\CBCQG Grant APPLICATION -SOLID WASTE.doc _72_ Corpus Christi, Texas of , 2010 The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT GRANT APPLICATION, FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES DEPARTMENT, IN THE AMOUNT OF $31,000, TO THE COASTAL BEND COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS TO FUND A TIRE RECYCLING EVENT AND AN ADVERTISING AND EDUCATIONAL CAMPAIGN TO PROMOTE PROPER DISPOSAL OF TIRES, AND TO EXECUTE ALL RELATED DOCUMENTS. Whereas, the Coastal Bend Council of Governments ( "CBCOG ") is directed by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to administer solid waste grant funds for implementation of the CBCOG's adopted regional solid waste management plan; and Whereas, the City of Corpus Christi, Texas is qualified to apply for grant funds under the Request for Applications of the Regional Solid Waste Grants Program; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Director of Neighborhood Services or designee is authorized to request grant funding under the Coastal Bend Council of Governments Request for Applications of the Regional Solid Waste Grants Program for the Neighborhood Services Department in the amount of $31,000 to fund a tire recycling event, an advertising and educational campaign to promote proper disposal of tires; and act on behalf of City of Corpus Christi in all matters related to the grant application and any subsequent grant contract and grant project that may result. The Director of Neighborhood Services or designee is authorized to execute all documents related to the grant application. SECTION 2. That if the projects are funded, City of Corpus Christi, Texas will comply with the applicable grant requirements of the CBCOG, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, and the State of Texas. SECTION 3. That the grant funds and any grant - funded equipment or facilities will be used only for the purposes for which they are intended under the grant. SECTION 4. That the activities will comply with and support the adopted regional and local solid waste management plans adopted for the geographical area in which the activities are performed. ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary Approved: , 2010 Lisa Aguilar)ssistant City Attorney for the City Attorney Joe Adame Mayor H:1LEG- DIR1Lisa12010 Resolutions \CBCOG Grant APPLICATION - NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES.doc —74— Corpus Christi, Texas of , 2010 The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT A GRANT APPLICATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000, TO THE COASTAL BEND COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS FOR PROJECTS SPONSORED BY ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON COMMUNITY PRIDE AND CLEAN CITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE, TO FUND CLEAN UP, BEAUTIFICATION AND RECYCLING EVENTS, AND TO EXECUTE ALL RELATED DOCUMENTS. Whereas, the Coastal Bend Council of Governments ('CBCOG ") is directed by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to administer solid waste grant funds for implementation of the CBCOG's adopted regional solid waste management plan; and Whereas, the City of Corpus Christi, Texas is qualified to apply for grant funds under the Request for Applications of the Regional Solid Waste Grants Program; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the City Manager or designee is authorized to request grant funding under the Coastal Bend Council of Governments Request for Applications of the Regional Solid Waste Grants Program in the amount of $5,000 to fund clean -up, beautification and recycling events sponsored by the City of Corpus Christi Advisory Committee on Community Pride and Clean City Advisory Committee; and act on behalf of City of Corpus Christi in all matters related to the grant application and any subsequent grant contract and grant project that may result. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute all documents related to the grant application. SECTION 2. That if the projects are funded, City of Corpus Christi, Texas will comply with the applicable grant requirements of the CBCOG, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, and the State of Texas. SECTION 3. That the grant funds and any grant- funded equipment or facilities will be used only for the purposes for which they are intended under the grant. SECTION 4. That the activities will comply with and support the adopted regional and local solid waste management plans adopted for the geographical area in which the activities are performed. ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary Approved: July 15, 2010 Lisa Aguilar r(isistant City Attorney for the City 'A orney CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Joe Adame Mayor H:LLEG- n1RlLisal2010 ResolutionslCBCOG Grant APPLICATION- pride.doc —76— Corpus Christi, Texas of , 2010 The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott 9 Related to item 9 AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Ac#ion Date: ,July 20, 20'[0 AGENDA ITEM: ITEM A: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO ACCEPT A GRANT OF $50,000 FROM THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES FOR PERSONNEL COSTS AND TRAVEL EXPENSES TO FUND A HOSPITAL PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM RELATING TO A PLAN FOR RESPONDING TO AN ACT OF TERRORISM AND TO EXECUTE ALL RELATED DOCUMENTS; AND RATIFYING ACCEPTANCE OF THE GRANT AGREEMENT TO BEGIN JULY 1, 2010. ITEM B: ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING A GRANT OF X50,000 FROM THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES IN THE NO. 1066 HEALTH GRANTS FUND TO FUND A HOSPITAL PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM .RELATING TO A PLAN FOR RESPONDING TO AN ACT OF TERRORISM; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. ISSUE: The Department of State Health Services (DSHS) has awarded a grant in the amount of $50,000 to maintain the laboratory beginning July 1, 2010, through June 30, 2011, as a Level B laboratory. This grant will fund the salary for one (1) technical position and travel to support the testing and teaching functions required in the grant. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Acceptance of the grant and appropriation of funds. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: Council approved funding FY09-10. FUNDING. There is 10% match funding required. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval ofthe resolution and ordinance as presented. ~~ ~~ J ~~,~ Ann tte Rodriguez, P. ~ Director of Public Health a n netterCc_r~,.cctexas. com 36'I=BZ~iw71Ub This item continues our current contract with the DSHS to maintain our laboratory at a Level B capacity within the Laboratory`Response Network. This will enable the laboratory to teach hospital laboratory personnel to recognize select agents that may be used for weapons of mass destruction. The contract period is from 711/10p 6130111, and funds are being awarded to cover personnel and travel. This contract requires 10%1$5,000 matching funds. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO ACCEPT A GRANT OF $50,000 FRAM THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES FQR PERSONNEL CASTS AND TRAVEL EXPENSES TO FUND A HOSPITAL PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM RELATING TO A PLAN FOR RESPONDING TO AN ACT OF TERRORISM AND TD EXECUTE ALL RELATED DOCUMENTS; AND RATIFYING ACCEPTANCE OF THE GRANT AGREEMENT TO BEGIN JULY 1, 2010. BE IT RESDLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY DF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The City Manager or his designee is authorized to accept a grant of $50,000 from the Texas Department of State Health Services for personnel casts and travel expenses to fund a Hospital Preparedness Program relating to a plan for responding to an act of terrorism and to execute all related documents. Furthermore, the City Council ratifies acceptance of the grant agreement to begin July 9, 2090. ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Joe Adame Mayor APPROVED: July 94, 2Q90 < /~/JJe ~ f ~ f~~~'l Eliza ~ h R. Hundley Assis ant-City Attorney for the City Attorney EHFES2B9 Garpus Christi, Texas day of , 2010 The above resolution was passed by the fallowing vote: Joe Adame Ghris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizonda, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla G. Leal Jahn E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott ~ H res2fi89 AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING A GRANT OF $50,000 FROM THE TEXAS ^EPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES IN THE NO. 1066 HEALTH GRANTS FUND TO FUND A HOSPITAL PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM RELATING TO A PLAN FOR RESPONDING TO AN ACT OF TERRORISM; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 9. Grant funding in the amount of $50,000 from the Texas Department of Sta#e Health Services is appropriated in the No. 1066 Health Grants Fund to fund a Hospital Preparedness Program relating to a plan for responding to an act of terrorism. SECTION Z. Upon the written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council: {1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficien# and effective administration of City affairs, and {2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and tapes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure on this the day of -- - _ .2010. ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED: July 14, 2010 .j ~1 .- j ° .1 ~~ E[izab~ R. Handley , Assis~ t City Attorney for the City Attorney CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Joe Adame Mayor Hnrd3 pS Carpus Christi, Texas day of , 2010 TD THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Carpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rote as to cansideratian and voting upon ordinances at twa regular meetings: Uwe, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally an the date it is introduced, ar at the present meeting of the City Council. Respectfully, Council Members Respectfully, Joe Adame Mayor The above ordinance was passed lay the following rote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizonda, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott ~Hard305 10 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: July 20, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution amending Council Policy No. 14, "Boards, Commissions, and Committee Procedures ", to limit service on boards, commissions, committees or corporations effective upon passage. ISSUES: The current council policy states that no person shall be appointed to serve on more than one board, commission or committee of the City at the same time. In addition to City boards, the Council also appoints members to boards not created by the city or where other governmental entities appoint members. These type of boards have been designated as "non -city boards" by the Legal department. Since the current policy does not address service to non -city boards, it has allowed appointment of individuals by the city council to more than one Board at a time. This amendment to the policy limits the service of members appointed by the City Council to only one board, commission, committee or corporation atthe same time, unless required by charter, statute, or other ordinance. Members currently serving will be grandfathered to continue their service on the boards that they are currently serving on. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the Resolution as presented. 624_, Armando Chapa City Secretary A RESOLUTION AMENDING COUNCIL POLICY 14 "BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEE PROCEDURES" TO LIMIT SERVICE ON BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES OR CORPORATIONS EFFECTIVE UPON PASSAGE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Council Policy 14, "Boards, commissions and committee procedures," adopted by Resolution No. 021901 on March 22, 1994, is amended to read as follows" 14. Boards, commissions, and committee procedures. "All individuals considered for appointment by the City Council to a Board, Commission, or Committee must have a resume or biographical information sketch on file in the office of the City Secretary. All vacancies must be listed on a City Council agenda in order for appointments to be made. Any Council Member can nominate persons to fill vacancies, except where the law requires nomination by the Mayor or City Manager. Each appointment must receive a majority vote of the Council Members present and voting. The following rules and procedures will govern standing City Boards, Commissions, and Committees: m. No person may serve as a voting member of a board, commission, or committee of the City for a period longer than six (6) years consecutively unless such service is required by virtue of the person's position or title as the result of employment or to complete an unexpired term. No person may be reappointed to the same board, commission, or committee after having been appointed to terms that would provide for six (6) consecutive years of service as a voting member unless the person has not served on that board, commission, or committee for a period of twelve (12) months. No person shall be appointed by the Mayor or City Council to serve on more than one eity board, commission, or committee, or corporation of the City at the same time unless required by charter, statute, or other ordinance or when such service is required by virtue of the individual's position or title as the result of employment. ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: July 15, 2010 Carlos Valdez City Attorney CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Joe Adame Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas of ,2010 The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr, Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott 11 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: July 20. 2010 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance authorizing the resale of (74) properties for $234,030.00 which were foreclosed upon for failure to pay ad valorem taxes, with opening bids at a tax resale auction of 30% of the most recent tax appraisal value, as described on the attached Exhibit A; and declaring an emergency. ISSUE: Properties located in the City of Corpus Christi are periodically foreclosed upon by Nueces County for non - payment of ad valorem taxes. Section 34.05 of the Property Tax Code requires that the governing body of the respective taxing entities approve the resale of these properties. Approval of this Ordinance will authorize the Nueces County Judge to execute a resale deed for the properties and approve the sale of these properties with an opening bid of 30% percent of the most recent tax appraisal value. A public auction of these properties is scheduled to be held on September 18, 2010 on the Courthouse steps with this reduced opening bid. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of the proposed Ordinance authorizing the resale of the listed properties. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that City Council approve the proposed Ordinance in order to place the properties back on the tax roll. Attachm ents B ackground Inform ati on Exhibit A —91— c-•-• _ z --- : ---� -� Constance P. Sanchez Interim Director of Financial Services constancep@cctexas.com (361) 826-3227 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Properties within the City of Corpus Christi are periodically foreclosed upon for nonpayment of ad valorem taxes. The law firm of Linebarger, Goggan, Blair, & Sampson, L.L.F. brought forward seventy -four (74) properties for resale at the opening bid prices listed in Exhibit A. The monies received from this sale will be distributed pursuant to the property tax code. The net proceeds from the sale are first applied to pay off the outstanding court costs and the remaining funds are applied on a pro rata basis to each taxing jurisdiction. The opening bids are set at 30% of the most recent tax appraisal value. If any of the properties are not sold at this initial auction, it is proposed to immediately re -offer those properties for sale by the auctioneer at half of the original opening bid This action is to ensure that every reasonable effort is made to sell the properties and return them to the tax rolls The total sale price for these properties is $234,030.00. Each of these seventy-four (74) properties has been reviewed by Neighborhood Services, Engineering Services, and Parks and Recreation for potential City use, but none were identified. Therefore, all seventy -four (74) properties will remain on the list for resale. Approval of the ordinance will authorize the Nueces County Judge to execute a Resale Deed for the properties listed and the properties, if sold, will be returned to the property tax roll for the upcoming year. - 93- W 0 N ,.D h7 Co N -1 N CA N LA N .P. N w h] N N Y• N d � - Po -.1 CA LA w N •... O +D W �1 C• LA 4. Co N ' "" - . W p0 W ----3 W T W LA W A W W L+.] N W W a N tiD N PO N ---.1 N CA N LA N A N W N N N r N ❑ "" +D Po �1 CA - LA A - W N . .- a x D- E001 -L0 d A N CD naaaaaaanr� o A 4D v A A ti aaaa o A -4 D d A ■∎O a A a A '.0 c -4 ■∎ o A A _ VD o A A D 0 -4 � a A '.0 o .1 J .--. a 14 N 97- 0464 -C 04- 7047 -A o CA W .1 CO nnrz 0 ---.1 LA N o ----) ----1 O 1 06- 3802 -E a v a� v A¢ ---.1 A ❑❑ N La .1 v CA Ch 6AI C., _v LA N nm ❑ 1 97- 1825 -H a w i4. V to 66er)i s Q WW — oo L '_ 1 • : 709 Elesa 201 Shawnee 1 818 Rodd Field Road C -5 1817 Rodd Field Road C-4 1816 Rodd Field Road C -3 1815 Rodd Field Road C -2 1814 Rodd Field Road C -1 1813 Rodd Field Road B -6 1812 Rodd Field Road B -5 1811 Rodd Field Road B -4 1810 Rodd Field Road B -3 1809 Rodd Field Road B -2 1808 Rodd Field Road B -1 GO Ch C;1 CT L2925 Sunrise Street 1115 Seventh Street 2309 Crews Ch 00 0 0 1311 Ramirez Street 1420 N. Alameda Street 810 Waco Street 1301 Peabody 2500 Mary Street 2634 Marguerite 707 25th Street 800 Bk Parker's Alley 808 Francesca 2318 Summers 1705 Lexington Avenue 2409 Summers i''[,' .r��'. .�•.�,r••.x�d•,. t ^. r;.; of ;..; P twl GS at N .-- D1 0 tJi LG t 00 VI -1 ch ON Lh N A (....1 W N N LO --• VI O A tO A 00 A -.1 A CS A Ln A A A W 4 N A --, A a W FO W 00 W �1 Co OS W to W -P W W - W . N -gym- ,44 V �1 C1 0 OS 00 OS -1 OS O, CS VI Ct A CS W OS N OS ,- ON 0 U SG LA 00 tl1 - N 0. to L0 LA A L? to L' tv [Ji .., L11 0 A SG A oa . �1 A Qt A to A A A W A N A --' a _ r _, , . _, 0000 1 at - 6 Co w 'O 00 --1 L0 dwb�naamxx.�& 00 - 00 00 �1O c5„, Lo C a as N J0 a L , v) a v N N a v iJ N v - O N N ,.0 rn�1 08- 5254 -H 08-5957-1-1 00 00 a 00 00 a i.] O CS a .1 N _ W 0 0. V w a 0 00 aW Lil mz6a 0 C+ Al o v. J a C, w W 00 . W cc, a at Ln Cr\ •• +0 � 1 04- 7188 -G o C. tC. N CO VI aa66 0 A 0 vt w 1 OS N tam - a a 0 v v .l w w ..r A W 0A = L 6:,rn; No Street Access 502 Webb Street 514 Webb Street 510 Webb Street 15805 Gypsy Street 14729 Quarterdeck 1013 McDonald Street 13929 Sea Anchor 15021 Das Marinas 15262 Capstan 15805 Linda Drive 1019 Hibiscus Street 2318 Mary Street 7 1401 Acapulco Street 710 Dolores Street 1544 15th Street 402 Garfield Street 908 18th Street 11513 18th Street 1713 Coleman 122 Richard 13036 Reyna Street 810 Louis Lynch Drive 318 Shawnee 11708 Stillman 3002 Mac Arthur 2321 1-latch 2722 Nogales 1314 Sabinas Street 1525 Sam Rankin @a W. Broadway 2935 Highland Avenue 2822 Blake • s" < _ 'yx a. az Tract D, Lot 27, Block H, Flour Bluff Estates Lot 21A, Block 9, Flour Bluff Estates No. 2 Lot 22B, Block 9, Flour Bluff Estates No. 3 Lot 22A, Block 9, Hour Bluff Estates No. 4 Lot 22, Block 13, Coquina Bay, Padre Island Lot 8, Block 721, Barataria Bay Unit 5, Padre island Lot 17, Block 12, Flour Bluff Park Lot 8, Block 716, Barataria Bay Unit 5 Lot 51, Block 707, Barataria Bay, Unit 3 Lot 4, Block 6, Barataria Bay, Unit 2 Lot 10, Block 7, Coquina Bay A portion of Lot 6, Block 4, Montrose Park Addition Lot 9, Block 9, Patrick Webb Addition Lot 16, Block 'B', Los Encinos Addition Lot 49, Block 1, San Pedro Addition Lots 53 and 54, Block 1202 Bay Terrace #2 Addition Lot 1, Block 1, Woodland Heights Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, Wiess Addition Lots 25 and 26, Block 1602, Bay Terrace No. 2 And 5 Block 9 Extension of South End Addition Lot 18, Block 8, Southmoreland Addition Lot 12, Block C, La Gloria Addition Lot Block "A ", Lynch Addition Lot 22, Block 8, Austin Addition Lots 21 and 22, Block 26, Hillcrest Addition Lot 16, Block 3, La Arboleda Addition Lot Block 6, Shoreline Park Addition 1Lot 15, Block 3, Carver Addition Lot 21, Block "C ", La GIoria Addition Lot 28, Block "B ", North Broadway Addition Lots 2 and 3, Block 5, Montrose Park Lot 7, Reynolds Addition, No. 2 • n -(tir Li:. mss.+ 'cam F V 1 10 -] 0 6 0 cA a \Q 0 666666a 0 to 10 L.•, 0 0 T a 0 0 N o 0 0 to - 0 0 Oh O N 0 0 h] A 00 0 0 N A CO 0 666 0 N -- 00 01 0 0 0 0 1 00'001 `Z •__• �• N .1 . t„ 0 0 O 0 a s 1,130.00 2,460.00 3,360.00 LJl 00 to 0 6 0 N A � 0 6 0 00 0 0 6 0 w w o 0 ' 0 0 — ur w 0 6 0 1 1,700.00 1 N O. .1 0 a 0 00'080`Z — 0o 00 0 6 0 w O 0 6 0 1.] to L0 0 0 0 .� -1 N 0 6 0 04'0I17`Z 00.050`1 W00'0S0`1 -, 4 - I -94- '-1 . -1 W -1 N -.1 — -1 a CA ro Cr, 00 a\ J a,, at ar LA II. L.4 i> >_ its' .' -. tiC G 00 %O 00 00 00 v -1 00 v .1 -1 a. �1 111 -1 A v 1 - ! la 'D -•-•) 0 -•-•) a 0.4 0 ---.) 0 a, a A a .p.. a 1+ 0 Q W 11.4 47 W W at A !214 -E 0 v ea O pN a, .1 vi N [n 00 N Cry 4641 Barrera Drive 18804 Caroline 19122 Scapular 11022 Main Drive 606 Jane Street 114249 Sea Pines 114805 Quarterdeck 116102 Coral Vine Stn 114265 Sea Pines 114500 Bk of Swordfi5 [14830 Aquarius �^.. iii • Lot 26 -C, Block 10, Molina Subdivision Lot 12, Block 10, McNorton Subdivision Lot 26, Block 6, San Juan Addition No. Lot 36, Block 3, Hudson Acres Addition Lot 15, Block 9, Flour Bluff Estates #2 Lot 5, Block 13, Sea Pines, Unit 1 Lot 2, Block 717, Barataria Bay Unit 5 Lot 1, Block 10, Sea Pines Unit 1 Lot 1, Block 13, Sea Pines, Unit I Lot 6, Block 5, Island Fairway Estates Lot 23, Black 717, Barataria Bay, Unit 5 • 4. $234,+ raw W 5, aAa\0' 00'0E1`L 0.. • - '.p — N.) N O 0 00 Q 0 0 0 a G O O 0 1 c ooa ooa G ='"� a b 0 0 0 0 0 0 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE RESALE OF SEVENTY -FOUR (74) PROPERTIES FOR $234,030.00 WHICH WERE FORECLOSED UPON FOR FAILURE TO PAY AD VALOREM TAXES, WITH OPENING BIDS AT A TAX RESALE AUCTION OF 30% OF THE MOST RECENT TAX APPRAISAL VALUE, AS DESCRIBED ON THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to Section 34.05 of the Tax Code, the governing body of the City of Corpus Christi authorizes the sale of seventy -four (74) properties shown on the attached and incorporated Exhibit A at a tax resale auction, with opening bids of 30% of the most recent tax appraisal value, as described on the attached Exhibit A. Should property fail to sell, opening bid shall be further reduced by one -half. SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the of , 2010. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa City Secretary Legal form approved July 14, 2010 By:_„�: Lisa Aguilar Assistant City Attorney for City Attorney Joe Adame Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas Day of , 2010 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings: I /we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council. Respectfully, Respectfully, Joe Adame Mayor Council Members The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott 12 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: July 20, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance appropriating $360,682.91 in the General Fund No. 1020 from the Unreserved Fund Balance for reimbursement of improvements made by the Corpus Christi Independent School District at the Natatorium; changing FY 2009 -2010 Operating Budget adopted by Ordinance 028252 by increase appropriations by $360,682.91; and declaring an emergency. ISSUE: The City and Corpus Christi School District ( CCISD) have a joint use agreement for the Natatorium and Gymnasium. As part of the agreement, the City funds any necessary capital improvements at 35% of total costs, and CCISD funds 65 %. During the 2009 -2010 school year, the Natatorium was closed so that renovations and improvements of gas lines, filtration system, pool lighting, diving boards, and shower areas could be completed. City Staff evaluated the needs and agreed that these improvements were necessary for operational efficiency and safety of users. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Council action is required to authorize the City Manager or his designee to appropriate funds. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: none CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this ordinance as presented. • • Midhaei Morris, Diredtor Parks and Recreation Department 361 - 826 -3461 MichaelMo @cctexas.com Attachments: Background Breakdown of expenditures for Natatorium improvements BACKGROUND INFORMATION The City of Corpus Christi and the Corpus Christi Independent School District ( CCISD) entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement in 1993 "to construct, maintain, and operate a natatorium and gymnasium ". In Section 4.12, the agreement specifies that the City pays 35% of costs and CCISD pays 65% of costs. CCISD identified specific renovations and improvements for the Natatorium for 2009 2010. City Staff evaluated the needs and agreed that these improvements were necessary for operational efficiency and the safety of users. The Natatorium renovations included: - replacement of filtration system - replacement of gas line - re-direction of sanitary sewer line - sandblasting, powder coating and painting of diving board stands and handrail supports - replacement of pool lights - replace deck tiles in shower areas - drain and power wash pools COSTS FOR THE NATATORIUM RENOVATIONS 2009 - 2010 SCHOOL YEAR City of Corpus Christi portion CCISD 35% 65% $360, 682.9/ $669, 839.68 Company Scope of Work Filtration Equipment Installation of Filtration Equipment Cost $371,573.00 $296,459.01 1 Halogen Supply Company, Inc. 2 Biscayne Group Inc. 3 SCA Consulting Engineers Fee for Halogen & Biscayne base bids $53,324.87 4 SCA Consulting Engineers Additional fees for Biscayne change order $1,292.78 , 5 Atlantis A uatic Grou Additional Re -Pi in $172,844.00 6 Atlantis Aquatic Group Change order for drain grates $15,000.00 7 SCA Consulting Engineers Additional fees for Atlantis job $13,543.82 8 Reed Plumbing Replacement of Gas Line $6,323.49 9 SCA Consulting Engineers Additional fees for gas line replacement $521.69 10 Reed Plumbing Re- Direction of Sanitary Sewer $11,666.17 11 SCA Consulting Engineers Additional fees for sanitary sewer redirection $962.46 12 Texas Steel Painting of Diving Board Stands $1,396.50 13 McWelding and Fabrications Sand blast & powder coat diving boards stands, handrail supports $5,108.50 Diamond Core Drilling Diving Board Anchor Hole Borings , $2,100.00 _14 15 Cruz Drywall Power Wash Both Pools $10,000.00 16 Leslie's Pool Replace Pool Lights $1,439.93 - 17 Leslie's Pool 450 lbs. of start up chemicals $222.85 18 Lincoln Commercial Replace Dri Deck Tiles in Showers $1,760.00 19 Keith Sanders Structural design for diving board re- installation $750.00 20 Dive Cincinnati Nuts & bolts for diving boards $590.00 21 Fencing Inc. Install gates for pool chemical storage to meet code _ $1,372.00 22 In -house - Maintenance Work Order F143149 Drain Pool $207.54 23 1n -house - Maintenance Work Orders F143902 and F142094 Replaced 4" pipe hangers $3,323.27 24 In -house - Maintenance Work Order F142472 Install new anchor system for diving boards $8,198.74 25 AGCM Project Manager on site full time October 05 to December 15th $49,792.00 26 City of Corpus Christi Required City Permits $749.97 _27 SCA Consulting Engineers Pass through cost for leak testing by Reed Plumbing •* Grand Total $1,030,522.59 City of Corpus Christi portion CCISD 35% 65% $360, 682.9/ $669, 839.68 Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $360,682.91 IN THE GENERAL FUND NO. 1020 FROM THE UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF IMPROVEMENTS MADE BY THE CORPUS CHRISTI INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT AT THE NATATORIUM; CHANGING FY 2009 -2010 OPERATING BUDGET ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE 028252 BY INCREASING APPROPRIATIONS BY $360,682.91; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That $360,682.91 is appropriated in the General Fund No. 1020 from the Unreserved Fund Balance for reimbursement of improvements made by the Corpus Christi Independent School District at the Natatorium; changing FY 2009 -2010 Operating Budget adopted by Ordinance 028252 by increasing appropriations by $360,682.91; and declaring an emergency. SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the day of , 2010. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa Joe Adame City Secretary Mayor Approved: July 15, 2010 Lisa Aguii , Assistant City Attorney for the City Attorney Corpus Christi, Texas Day of , 2010 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings: I /we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council. Respectfully, Respectfully, Joe Adame Mayor Council Members The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott 13 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: 7120/10 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $125,000 FROM THE UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE IN THE FUND NO. 5612 FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIMS COSTS; CHANGING THE FY 09 -10 BUDGET ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE 028252 BY INCREASING EXPENDITURES BY $125,000. ISSUE: The City Charter prohibits Funds from overspending appropriations approved by the City Council. The City Charter requires new appropriations to be presented for Council approval to increase expenditures in these funds, in order to meet operational expenses. The Liability/Employee Benefits — Workers Compensation Fund is anticipated to overspend its appropriations due to increased costs in Workers Compensation claims. This "housekeeping" ordinance is necessary to insure the City is in compliance with Charter requirements. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of Ordinance to increase appropriations is required to remain in compliance with the City Charter. dntato),_ Eddie Houlihan Assistant Director of Management & Budget EddieHo@cctexas.com 361 -880 -3792 Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $125,000 FROM THE UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE IN THE FUND NO. 5612 FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIMS COSTS; CHANGING THE FY 09 -10 BUDGET ADOPTED BY ORDNANCE 028252 BY INCREASING EXPENDITURES BY $125,000; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That $125,000 is appropriated from the Unreserved Fund Balance in the Fund No. 5612 for Workers Compensation Claims costs; changing FY 2009 -2010 Operating Budget adopted by Ordinance 028252 by increasing expenditures by $125,000.00. SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate.action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the day of , 2010, ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa Joe Adame City Secretary Mayor Approved: July 14, 2010 A r� Assistant Ag sistant City Attorney For the City Attorney Corpus Christi, Texas Day of , 2010 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings: I /we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council. Respectfully, Respectfully, Joe Adame Mayor Council Members The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott 14 AGENDA MEMORANDUM AGENDA ITEM: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 26 to the professional architectural /engineering services contract with Pierce, Goodwin, Alexander and Linville, Inc. of Dallas, Texas (PGAL) in an amount not to exceed $97,087.83, for a restated not to exceed total fee of $4,024,859.13 for additional construction management and inspection services for Taxiway Rehabilitation Project No. 10019, Taxiway Signage /Lighting Project No. 10020, Airfield Drainage Phase 6 Project No. 10021, and Airfield Perimeter Road Improvements Project No. 10027. July 26, 2010 AMENDMENT: The amendment provides for additional construction management and inspection services for four projects being managed and inspected by PGAL. All local field construction management and inspection services is provided by PGAL's local sub - consultant (Martinez, Guy, and Maybick). The amendment provides for additional time for completion of construction of four projects due to significant rain delays. CONSULTANT SELECTION /PROJECTS: The City selected PGAL for Airport engineering services through an RFP for a multi -year service agreement in 2004. The agreement was set up to be amended to authorize additional projects as funding becomes available from the FAA. The City has historically utilized multi -year engineering contract to successfully take advantage of year end FAA Discretionary funds. The contract has previously been amended 25 times as FM and local funding became available to authorize for new projects and additional services associated with those projects. FAA requested the amendment to ensure improvements constructed after the anticipated completion of the project conform to the plans and specifications. FUNDING: Funding is available from the Airport Capital and Grant Funds. The FAA is providing 95% of the funding for this amendment. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the motion as presented. 1/14h Fred Segundo Director of Aviation 361 - 289 -0171 ext. 1213 freds@cctexas.com Pete Anaya, P.E. Director of Engineering Services 361 - 826 -3781 petean @cctexas.com ADDITIONAL SUPPORT MATERIAL Exhibit A. Background information Exhibit A -1, Prior Council /Administrative Action Exhibit B. Contract Summary Exhibit C. Location Map —1 1 5— BACKGROUND INFORMATION CONTRACT SUMMARY: The amendment provides for additional time required for completion of construction of six projects due to delays in pipeline relocation /adjustments and significant rain delays. Most of the projects were anticipated to be completed in one year or Tess. Delays were caused by the addition of project scope, pipeline adjustments that delayed drainage work, and significant delays caused by rain events. The additional construction duration has required the consultant to continue to staff the projects for a longer time than was originally provided by the contract. The selection of Pierce Goodwin Alexander and Linville (PGAL) of Houston, Texas was through an RFP process in compliance with Federal Aviation Administration regulations. The firm was selected to provide professional architectural and engineering service for the Corpus Christi International Airport for a multiple year period. The projects in question were authorized by the FAA with 95 funding paid by FAA Grants. FAA will pay 95% of the cost of this amendment. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: This amendment addresses the additional construction management and inspection time to complete the following projects: • Taxiway Rehabilitation Project No. 10019; • Taxiway Signage /Lighting Project No. 10020; • Airfield Drainage Phase 6 Project No. 10021; and • Airfield Perimeter Road Improvements Project No. 10027. PRIOR COUNCIL ACTIONS /ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS: There have been extensive contract amendments with PGAL. PGAL was selected for a multi -year contract to provide engineering services for CCIA in 2004. Each additional service and new project required Council or staff authorization. The process that was used to authorize the additional scope or to provide services for a new project was through a contract amendment of the original contract. This was done to enable rapid authorization to meet critical FAA deadlines. Failure to meet the FAA deadline could result in either a Toss of funding or reduction of discretionary funding in future years. A complete list of Council and staff actions is attached. See Exhibit A -1. FUTURE COUNCIL ACTIONS: Council will be requested to authorize: • Award of any change orders that may require Council action; and • Award of future construction contracts, engineering and engineering contract amendments when authorized by FAA. FUNDING: Funding is available from Airport Capital Reserve. —116— EXHIBIT A Page 1 of 2 BOARD /COMMITTEE REVIEW: The Airport Board has reviewed the proposed award and recommended its approval. —117 - HAHOME KEVINSIGENWIR restoredl2OO4ImorovementslAE- PGAL1AEAmd26AwdBkaExhA.dnr. EXHIBIT ;.1 Page 2 of 2 PRIOR ACTIONS PRIOR COUNCIL ACTIONS: The Council awarded a multi -year contract for architectural/engineering services to Pierce Goodwin Alexander and Linville (PGAL) of Houston, Texas in 2004 in accordance with the required FAA selection procedures. Compliance with FAA regulations in the selection, award, contracting and payment procedures is necessary to receive FAA funding. FAA grants traditionally paid 80% of the capital cost of eligible projects. FAA is currently paying 95% of the eligible project costs. Specific actions previously taken by Council in regard to the contract with PGAL were: June 8, 2004 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an architectural/engineering services contract with Pierce, Goodwin, Alexander and Linville (PGAL), Inc. of Dallas, Texas in an amount not to exceed $1,375,025 for multiple Airport Improvement Projects including Runway 13/31 Rehabilitation, Overlay, Blast Pads, Shoulders and Edge Lighting; Airfield Drainage Improvements Ph. 3; Runway 13 Localizer Relocation; and the CCIA Master Plan Update (Motion No. 2004 -224); August 29, 2006 — a. Ordinance Appropriating $376,950 from the Unreserved Fund Balance in the Airport Operating Fund 4610 for Professional Services Associated with Engineering and Design of the West GA Apron and Drainage Improvements, Phase V at Corpus Christi International Airport; Funds will be Reimbursed upon Award of Federal Aviation Administration Grant 38; Amending FY 2006 -2007 Operating Budget Adopted By Ordinance No. 026908 to Increase Appropriations by $376,950; and Declaring an Emergency. b. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 5 to the architectural/engineering services contract with Pierce, Goodwin, Alexander and Linville (PGAL), Inc. of Dallas, Texas in an amount not to exceed $376,950 for the Corpus Christi International Airport West General Aviation Apron Rehabilitation and Drainage Phase V Improvement Projects (Motion No. 2006 -272); December 12, 2006 — a. Ordinance Appropriating $75,000 from the Unreserved Fund Balance in the Airport Operating Fund 4610 for Professional Services for a Benefit / Cost Analysis to Assess the Feasibility of a Possible Extension of Runway 13/31 at Corpus Christi International Airport; Funds will be Reimbursed upon Award of Federal Aviation Administration Grant 38; Amending FY 2006 -2007 Operating Budget Adopted by Ordinance No. 026908 to Increase Appropriations by $75,000; and Declaring an Emergency, b. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 7 to the architectural/engineering services contract with Pierce, Goodwin, Alexander and Linville (PGAL), Inc. of Dallas, Texas in an amount not to exceed $75,000 for a Benefit / Cost Analysis to Assess the Feasibility of a Possible Extension of Runway 13/31 (Motion No. 2006 -399). July 10, 2007 — Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Exhibit A -1 Page 1 of 4 —118— Amendment No. 11 to the engineering services contract with Pierce, Goodwin, Alexander and Linville (PGAL), Inc. of Dallas, Texas in an amount not to exceed $327,000 for the Corpus Christi International Airport Airfield Drainage Phase VI and Taxiway Rehabilitation, Signage and Lighting Improvement Projects (Motion 2007 -176); August 19, 2008 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 15 to the engineering services contract with Pierce, Goodwin, Alexander and Linville (PGAL), Inc. of Dallas, Texas in an amount not to exceed $374,065 for a restated not to exceed total fee of $2,629,069 for the Corpus Christi International Airport Airfield Perimeter Road Improvements, Airport Rescue and Firefighting Facility and Airfield Equipment and Maintenance Facility (Motion 2008 -221); October 21, 2008 — Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 16 to the engineering services contract with Pierce, Goodwin, Alexander and Linville (PGAL), Inc. of Dallas, Texas in an amount not to exceed $259,744.80 fora restated not to exceed total fee of $2,888,813.80 for the Corpus Christi International Airport Airfield Drainage Phase VI and Taxiway Rehabilitation, Signage and Lighting Improvement Projects for construction management and inspection (Motion No. 2008 -273); January 13, 2009 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 18 to the engineering services contract with Pierce, Goodwin, Alexander and Linville, Inc. of Dallas, Texas (PGAL) in an amount not to exceed $175,987.00, for a restated not to exceed total fee of $3,073,820.80 for the Corpus Christi International Airport for the Airfield Equipment and Maintenance Facility for engineering design, bid and construction phase services (Motion 2009 -004); September 8, 2009 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 23 to the engineering services contract with Pierce, Goodwin, Alexander and Linville, Inc. of Dallas, Texas (PGAL) in an amount not to exceed $212,150.00, for a restated not to exceed total fee of $3,310,747.60 for the Corpus Christi International Airport Airfield Equipment and Maintenance Facility Project #10028, Air Rescue Fire Fighting Building improvements Project #10025, Terminal Re- Roofing Project (Old Wing) 2008 Project #10026, Toll Plaza Foundation Repairs, and Terminal Building Addition of Chiller No. 3 Project #10034 (Motion 2009 -246); December 8, 2009 -- Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 24 to the engineering services contract with Pierce, Goodwin, Alexander and Linville, Inc. of Dallas, Texas (PGAL) in an amount not to exceed $100,023.50, for a restated not to exceed total fee of $3,410,771.10 for additional construction management and inspection services, which was requested by FAA, for the Corpus Christi International Airport Airfield Equipment and Maintenance Facility Project #10028, Air Rescue Fire Fighting Building Improvements Project #10025, Terminal Re- Roofing Project (Old Wing) 2008 Project #10026, Toll Plaza Foundation Repairs, and Terminal Building Addition of Chiller No. 3 Project #10034 (Motion 2009- 340); and April 27, 2010 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 25 to the professional architectural /engineering services contract with Pierce, Goodwin, Alexander and Linville, Inc. of Dallas, Texas (PGAL) in an amount not to exceed $517,000.00, for a restated not to exceed total fee of $3,927,771.10 for design, bid and construction phase services for a new Corpus Christi International Exhibit A -1 Page 2of4 —119— Airport Consolidated Rent Car Quick Turn Around Facility. (Project #10030) (Motion 2010 -097). PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS: September 13, 2005 — Administrative award of Amendment No. 1 to PGAL for engineering services in the amount of $6,340.00 to provide drawings, plans and specifications and change order coordination for repair of runway pavement damage repair caused by contractor's pipe jacking and boring operations by placing pipe at two locations by the open cut method. February 16, 2006 - Administrative award of Amendment No. 2 for engineering services to PGAL in the amount of $4,785.00 for design a runway guard light system to be constructed on Taxiway "A" at the approach end of Runway 31 and 35 to be constructed via a change order to be negotiated with the City's Runway 13/31 Rehabilitation contractor, April 18, 2006 - Administrative award of Amendment No. 3 for engineering services to PGAL in the amount of $4,785.00 for design grade adjustments to improve drainage and eliminate slope criteria deficiencies at ends of Runway 13/31 within the RSA. May 19, 2006 - Administrative award of Amendment No. 4 for engineering services to PGAL. in the amount of $22,658.00 for design services necessary for open cutting of Taxiways A, B, D and E for storm sewer crossing originally specified to be bored. Work was associated with Change Order No. 7 and funds for the boring were deleted from the contractor's contract price. September 11, 2006 - Administrative award of Amendment No. 6 for engineering services to PGAL in the amount of $22,000.00 for providing the services of a title company to research and provide descriptions of all easements and other encumbrances that may affect the development of the Master Plan Update or future land use. May 15, 2007 - Administrative award of Amendment No. 9 for engineering services to PGAL in the amount of $8,000.00 for two Master Plan presentations (Planning Commission and City Council). June 14, 2007 - Administrative award of Amendment No. 10 for engineering services to PGAL in the amount of $5,610.00 for design services to effect immediate repairs to the downstream headwall for Drainage Line MD -1 to repair erosion and other damage to secure the area from further damage through a change order to the Runway 17 -35 Improvements. March 27, 2008 — Administrative award of Amendment No. 12 for engineering services to PGAL in the amount of $9,336.00 for a boundary survey required as part of Airfield Drainage Phase VI suitable for the City to acquire either in whole or a portion of a 15,858 -acre tract of land that will be crossed by the realignment of Main Ditch 1 (MD -1). April 10, 2008 - Administrative award of Amendment No. 13 for engineering services to PGAL in the amount of $1,500.00 to revise bid, contract, and project documents to include additive alternate bid documents for Phase VI Drainage based upon the request of the Federal Aviation Administration and the City. April 28, 2008 — Administrative award of Amendment No. 14 for engineering services to PGAL in the amount of $14,100.00 for Conceptual Planning Services for the proposed redevelopment of the Rental Car (RAC) Facilities at CCIA. December 5, 2008 — Administrative award of Amendment No. 17 for engineerin Exhibit A -1 Pa'e3of4 —120— services to PGAL in the amount of $9,020.00 for additional design phase services for the CCIA Drainage Phase 6 Improvements. March 9, 2009 - Administrative award of Amendment No. 19 for engineering services to PGAL in the amount of $1,750.00 telecommunications consulting services for the CCIA Airfield Equipment and Maintenance Facility. March 31, 2009 - Administrative award of Amendment No. 20 for engineering services to PGAL in the amount of $5,676.00 for field utility location and survey services consulting services for the CCIA Airfield Equipment and Maintenance Facility. June 18, 2009 - Administrative award of Amendment No. 21 for engineering services to PGAL in the amount of $17,350.00 to prepare plans, specifications, bid and contract documents for Taxiway B4 Widening as a stand alone construction project. August 20, 2009 - Administrative award of Amendment No. 22 for engineering services to PGAL in the amount of $ -0- for Construction Management and Inspection (CMI) services for the CC1A Perimeter Road Improvements project (CC PN 10027). Exhibit A -1 Page 4 of 4 —121— CONTRACT SUMMARY PGAL will provide Additional Services for Construction Management and Inspection services due to additional construction duration due to additional scope and weather delays for the following projects: • Taxiway Rehabilitation Project No. 10019; • Taxiway Signage /Lighting Project No. 10020; • Airfield Drainage Phase 6 Project No. 10021; and • Airfield Perimeter Road Improvements Project No. 10027. C. Summary of Fees Original Contract Total Authorized Fee (Runway 13/31, Drainage Ph. 3, Airport Beacon Relocation & Master Plan Update) Amendment No. 1 Pavement Repair Design Services Amendment No. 2 Runway Guard Light System Design Services Amendment No. 3 Drainage and Slope Grade Deficiency Corrections Amendment No. 4 Open Cut and Repair Taxiways A, B, D & E Design Amendment No. 5 West General Aviation Apron Rehabilitation Drainage Phase V Amendment 5 Fee Amendment No. 6 Title Research Amendment No. 7 Benefit Cost Analysis Extending 13/31 Amendment No. 8 BCA Extend 13/31 Additional Presentations Amendment No. 9 Master Plan — Additional Presentations BCA Extend 13/31 Additional Presentations Amendment No. 10 Drainage Line MD -1 Repairs Amendment No. 11 Taxiway System Rehabilitation, and Total Taxiway Rehabilitation Fee H:1FiQME1KEVfN51GEM AIR_ restored120041mprovements1AE - IAZ;EAmd265umExhB.doc Total $1,375,025 0 6,340 0 4,785 0 6,700 0 22,658 0 236,907 140,043 376,950 0 22,000 0 75,000 0 8,000 0 8,000 -8,000 0 5,610 0 0 94,000 Exhibit B Page 1 of 4 Taxiway System Signage /Lighting Rehabilitation 0 Total TW SignagelLighting Fee 50,000 Drainage Improvements Phase VI 0 Total Drainage Ph. VI Fee 183,000 Total Fee Amendment No. 11 327,000 Amendment No. 12 0 Additional Services: 0 Surveying 9,336 Total Fee Amendment No. 12 9,336 Amendment No. 13 0 Bid Phase Services — Revise Drainage Phase VI as Additive Alternate 1,500 Total Fee Amendment No. 13 1,500 Amendment No. 14 0 Conceptual Planning — Rental Car Facilities 14,100 Total Fee Amendment No. 14 14,100 Amendment No. 15 Perimeter Road Improvements 0 Basic Services: 0 Preliminary Phase Services 6,Q00 Design Phase Services 92,900 Bid Phase Services 3,026 Construction Phase Services 26,590 Additional Services 0 Surveying 50,505 Total Perimeter Road improvements 179,021 Airport Rescue and Firefighting Facility Basic Services: 0 Preliminary Phase Services 2,600 Design Phase Services 0 Pavement Design & Documentation 70,000 Building Design and Documentation 53,900 Bid Phase Services 3,000 Construction Phase Services 25,012 Additional Services: 0 Surveying 15,532 Total Airport Rescue and Firefighting Facility 170,044 Equipment Airfield Equipment and Maintenance Facility Basic Services: Exhibit B Page 2 of 4 H:IHOME1KEVINS \GEN\ AIR_ restoredl20041mprovementsAE -PGA EAmd26SumExhB.doc Preliminary Phase Services (Scope and Site Location — 15% Design) 25,000 Airfield Equipment and Maintenance Facility 25,000 Total Fee Amendment 15 374,065 Amendment 16 Construction Phase Services 41,457.00 Construction Inspection 21$,287.80 Total Fee Amendment No, 16 259,744.80 Amendment No. 17 Design Phase Services 9,020 Total Amendment No. 17 9,020 Amendment No. 18 Equipment Airfield Equipment and Maintenance Facility - Basic Services: Design Phase Services 146,446 Bid Phase Services 3,000 Construction Phase Services 26,541 Total Amendment No. 18 175,987 Amendment No. 19 Telecommunications Design for Airfield Equipment & Maintenance Facility 1,750 Total Amendment No. 19 1,750 Amendment No. 20 Subsurface Utility Excavation — Backhoe & Crew at $197.50 per hour — Not to Exceed 16 Hours. 3,160 Surveying Crew @ $125.00 per hour -- Not to Exceed 16 Hours. 2,000 PGAL Administration & Coordination 516 Total Amendment No. 20 5,676 Amendment No. 21 Taxiway B4 Widening Design Phase Services — Preparation of Plans, Specifications, Bid and Contract Documents 6,200 Bid Phase Services 5,350 Construction Phase Services 5,800 Total Amendment No. 21 17,350 Amendment No. 22 Perimeter Road Improvements Additional Services: Construction Management and Inspection 0 Total Amendment No. 22 0 TOTAL AUTHORIZED FEE 3,098,596.80 Exhibit B Page 3 of 4 H: 11-I OMEU{ EVINS1GEN1AIR_ restored12OO41mprovements \AE -PdA? EAmd26SumExhE.doc Amendment No. 23 Airfield Equipment and Maintenance Facility, ARFF Improvements, CCIA Terminal Re- Roofing Project (Old Wing) 2008, Toll Plaza Foundation Repairs, and Chiller Installation Additional Services — Construction Management and Inspection 212,150.80 Total Amendment No. 23 212,150.80 Amendment No. 24 Airfield Equipment and Maintenance Facility, ARFF Improvements, CCIA Terminal Re- Roofing Project (Old Wing) 2008, Toll Plaza Foundation Repairs, and Chiller Installation Additional Services — Construction Management and Inspection 100,023.50 Total Amendment No. 24 100,023.50 Amendment No. 25 Rent Car Quick Turnaround Facility Phase 1 — Concept Design 118,000 Phase 2 — Final Design 235,000 Phase 3 — Construction Services 105,000 Business and Financial Assistance Services 26,000 Reimbursable Expenses 33,000 Total Amendment No. 25 517,000 Amendment No. 26 Taxiway Rehabilitation Project No. 10019; Taxiway Signage /Lighting Project No. 10020; Airfield Drainage Phase 6 Project No. 10021; and Airfield Perimeter Road Improvements Project No. 1 0027. Additional Services — Construction Management and Inspection 97,087.83 Total Amendment No. 26 97,087,83 TOTAL AUTHORIZED FEE 4,024,859.13 Exhibit B Page 4 of 4 H:\HOMEUCEV!N51GEMAIR_ restored 120041mprovements1AE-'aig Amd2B5umExhB.doe File : \Mproject councilexhibits\exh 10019, 10020, 10021,10027.dw --4 824 CORMS C3 IUSV PROJECT LOCATION 1000 INTERNATIONAL DRIVE CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE !?WY 44 AGNES RD. BOCKHOLT RD ADDITNE BID SITE ALTERNATE NO.1 PERIMETER ROAD BASE BID SITES PERIMETER ROADS PROJECT # 10019, 10020, 10021, 10027 SITE PLAN NOT TO SCALE TAXIWAYS EXHIBIT "C" TAXIWAY REHABILITATION, TAXIWAY SIGN AGEJLIGHTING AND DRAINAGE PHASE VI AIRFIELD PERIMETER ROAD IMPROVEMENTS —1 7R— CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CARPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES PAGE: 1of1 DATE: 07 -13 -2010 0;1 w MO laW 15 AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: July 20, 2010 SUBJECT: Fire Station # 12 Driveway and Parking Lot Installation Project No. E10068. (BOND ISSUE 2004) AGENDA ITEM: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a Job Order Contract with Barcom Commercial Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the amount of $136,992.83 for Fire Station # 12 Driveway and Parking Lot Installation Located at 2120 Rand Morgan Road. ISSUE: Fire Station # 12 was built in the 1960's and is currently located at 2120 Rand Morgan Road. The traffic patterns have significantly increased since it was originally constructed. A school zone for Tuloso Intermediate is also on Rand Morgan Road and about 200 feet away from the Fire Station. Increased traffic has made it difficult for emergency vehicles to maneuver in and out of the existing driveway. It creates traffic blockage and has become a safety issue for the staff and motorist. The improvements will provide a turn around driveway for fire trucks to maneuver into the fire station with ease and not obstruct traffic. The new turn around driveway will be constructed in the place of the existing parking lot. A new parking lot will be constructed to accommodate staff and visitors. This project is proposed under the Job Order Contract and is now ready to begin construction; and requires City Council approval. FUNDING: Funding is available from the Bond 04 Budget. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Motion as presented. -",„/,-;) roc, Richard Hooks Pete Anaya, P.E. Fire Chief Director of Engineering Services 826 -3932 826 -3781 RLH @cctexas.com peteanacctexas.com Additional Su pport Material: Exhibit "A" Background Information Exhibit "B" Prior Project Action Exhibit "C" Project Budget Exhibit "D" Location Map BACKGROUND INFORMATION SUBJECT: Fire Station # 12 Driveway and Parking Lot Installation Project No.E1006$ (BOND ISSUE 2004) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project for Fire Station # 12 is located at 2120 Rand Morgan Road; Improvements will include a new turn around driveway to accommodate the turning radius of an emergency vehicle, provide a new parking lot for staff and visitors with an accessible parking stall. A new sidewalk from the parking lot to the existing sidewalk will be constructed to provide and accessible path. Underground utilities will be improved as required. CONTRACT TERMS: The project is estimated to require 100 calendar days, with the completion anticipated in November 2010. PROJECT BACKGROUND: Fire Station # 12 was built in the 1960's and is currently located at 2120 Rand Morgan Road south of Leopard Street It houses three emergency vehicles (Engine Apparatus, Hazmat Response Vehicle, and Brush Truck.) Fire Station # 12 is in need of driveway improvements to provide egress and ingress safety. The traffic patterns have significantly increased since it was originally constructed. Existing in the area is a school zone for Tuloso Intermediate School on the 2100 block of Rand Morgan approximately 200 feet away from the Fire Station. Increased traffic has made it difficult for the fire emergency vehicles to maneuver in and out of the existing driveway. It creates traffic blockage and has become a safety issue for the staff and motorist. The improvements will provide a new turn around driveway for the emergency vehicles to maneuver into the fire station with ease and not obstruct traffic. The new turn around driveway will be constructed in the place of the existing parking lot, A new parking lot will be constructed to accommodate staff and visitors. This project is proposed under the Job Order Contract and is now ready to begin construction; and requires City Council approval. On Tuesday, November 2, 2004, the City of Corpus Christi held an election to consider a number of ballot propositions to fund major capital improvements for the community, Bond Issue 2004. The November 2, 2004 election was held jointly with Nueces County and coincided with the Presidential Election. The Bond Issue 2004 package includes $95 million in projects to be funded from ad valorem property taxes (a General Obligation Bond Issue) in Street, Public Health and Safety, Public Facilities, Parks and Recreation, and Bayfront Master Plan projects. The proposed projects target the City's most immediate needs to improve existing physical facilities, provide for growth, and protect the City's investment in its infrastructure. —130— EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 2 METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION: Job Order Contracting (JOC) is an innovative contracting technique created for facilities maintenance and construction- related services to assist with obtaining greater contractor performance in relation to smaller projects on a cost- effective and timely basis. The JOC Program utilizes an "on- call" general construction contractor on an as- needed basis for an Indefinite Quantity Contract to perform minor construction, repair, rehabilitation or alteration of facilities. Job Order Contracting streamlines the construction procurement process by establishing an overriding indefinite delivery and indefinite quantity agreement with purchase or delivery orders based on specific projects as needed. This process is extremely flexible, allowing scope and cost to be accurately detailed BEFORE award. The following are important benefits of using this contract method: • Allows a better defined scope with cost for the customer. • Construction contract award can be accomplished in less than one month, significantly shortening the procurement time. • Each delivery order is a stand -alone contract. Future awards will be based specifically on the contractor's performance and the needs of the City of Corpus Christi. • Change Orders are minimized. The approved contractor will specifically conduct detailed site visits and discussions with City Staff to review the requirements, work conditions, and facility condition prior to submitting a proposal. This will significantly reduce and/or eliminate unforeseen conditions and excessive cost growth. —131— EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 2 PRIOR PROJECT ACTIONS SUBJECT: Fire Station # 12 Driveway and Parking Lot Installation Project No. E10068 (BOND ISSUE 2004) PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION: 1. November 2, 2004 — Resolution expressing official intent to reimburse costs of the 2004 Bond Capital Improvement Projects (Resolution No. 026015). 2. November 9, 2004 - Ordinance canvassing returns and declaring the results of the Special Election held on November 2, 2004, in the City of Corpus Christi for the adoption of five bond propositions; adoption of a permanent ad valorem tax freeze on residents homesteads of persons 65 years of age or older or disabled persons and eligible spouses; and adoption of seven amendments to the Charter of the City of Corpus Christi (Ordinance No. 026022). PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION: 1. August 26, 2004 - Distribution of Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2004 -03 Bond Issue 2004 Projects to 175 engineering firms (70 local and 105 non - local). 2. March 25, 2005 - Addendum No. 1 to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2004 -03 Bond Issue 2004 Projects to 175 engineering firms (70 local and 105 non - local). 3. April 13, 2005 - Addendum No. 2 to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2004 -03 Bond Issue 2004 Projects to 175 engineering firms (70 focal and 105 non - local) PROJECT BUDGET INTERNATIONAL WEST SIDE PONY LEAGUE Project No. 3369 February 23, 2010 FUNDS AVAILABLE: Public Health and Safety BOND 2004 Total $151,334.11 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction (BARCOM COMERCIAL.) $136,992.83 Contingencies (10%) $13,699.28 Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc) $642.00 Total $151,334.11 FUNDS REMAINING ($0.00) \Mproject coun ciiexhibits `exhE 10468. dwg F.. 824 cfSBAV 49 1 LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE PROJECT# E10068 EXHIBIT' D" Fire Station #12 Driveway and Parking Lot Installation (BOND ISSUE i f44 CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES PAGE: 1of9 I}drr• 7/1A /',, n 16 AGENDA MEMORANDUM DATE; July 20, 2010 SUBJECT: Nueces River /Delta Monitoring & Hydrodynamic Transport Analysis and Modeling — Project No. 8878 AGENDA ITf: Motion authorizing the Clty Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No 2 to the Environmental Consulting Services Contract with the Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $155,721 for a restated fee not to exceed $527,441 for Phase 2 of the Nueces River Basin Feasibility Study ( Nueces Delta Ecological Field Research and Nueces Delta Hydrodynamic Transport Analysis and Modeling). ISSUE: The City's Agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers requires the City's financial participation in the Nueces River Basin Feasibility Study. The proposed agreement counts as in -kind participation to support the City's requirement. FUNDING: Funding is available from the Adopted Operating Budget (Water Fund). REQMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Motion as presented. for 9/(71 Gustavo Gonzalez, P.E. Pete Anaya, P. E., Director Water Services Director of Engineering Services Additional Suogort Material: Exhibit NA" Background Information Exhibit "B' Contract Summary Exhibit "C" Location Map AGENDA BACKGROUND SUBJECT: Nueces River /Delta Monitoring & Hydrodynamic Transport Analysis and Modeling- Project No. 8678 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Environmental Monitoring will result in: (a) Field research to determine specific plant species or community assemblages, sample tidal creek salinity and sediment pore water to understand their relationship in the Nueces Delta, replicate photosynthetic measurements in the fall and spring, study the relationship between plant cover and biomass, and conduct nutrient enrichment experiments utilizing various. (b) Physical modeling to quantify the time /space fluxes of water, salt and temperature throughout the Nueces Delta as a function of river flow, tide and meteorological conditions. (c) Data compilation and analysis to compile data in a digital format that is readily accessible for processing (d) Draft and Final Report preparation to describe and analyze the data collected during the project with discussion of any future implications for the study area and should contain recommendations. BACKGROUND: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is administering research related to the Nueces River and Delta. The City's agreement with the Corps of Engineers requires funding participation as a required match of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers research. The Corps of Engineers requested the City provide that support through a contract with the Coastal Bend Bays and Estuary Program ( CBBEP). USACE made the request to avoid the higher markup of indirect costs required by an agreement between the GSA and State of Texas. CBBEP is able to contract with the University at a lower indirect cost markup. CBBEP and the University of Texas Marine Science Institute and the University of Texas Austin have agreed to enter into the required contracts through the University of Texas Office of Sponsored Research. The City will reimburse CBBEP the cost of their sub- contracts as in -kind participation for the USACE research. CONTRACT: A contract summary is attached. See Exhibit B. FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of future research participation as required by the City's Agreed Order. -138- EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 2 CONTRACT SUMMARY CBBEP will complete the following tasks for Phase 2 of the Nueces River Tributaries Feasibility Study Project: 1. TASKS. (a) Field Research. CBBEP will subcontract with the University of Texas Office of Sponsored Research to have' the University of Texas Marine Science Institute — Port Aransas (UTMSI), conduct ground -truth surveys for specific plant species or community assemblages, sample tidal creek salinity and sediment pore water to understand their relationship in the Nueces Delta, replicate photosynthetic measurements in the fall and spring of three species of plants utilizing a LI -COR 6200 Gas Exchange System, establish relationship between percent cover and biomass for each of the three vegetative species, and randomly establish plots for nutrient enrichment experiments utilizing various fertilizers that will be monitored by porewater sampling. (b) Physical Modeling. CBBEP will subcontract with the University of Texas Office of Sponsored Research to have the University of Texas Center for Research in Water Resources quantify the time /space fluxes of water, salt and temperature throughout the Nueces Delta as a function of river flow, tide and meteorological conditions. The modeling effort shall conduct the following: 1) Mass - conservative hydrodynamic modeling of water, salt and temperature fluxes across the Delta. 2) Hydraulic modeling of flow constrictions that are not hydrodynamically resolvable, e.g. the Mo -Pac railroad bridge. 3) Thermal modeling of heating /cooling /evaporation that affects water temperature, evaporation and salinity. 4) Data compilation and analysis of historical sources to identify critical data gaps and provide for model testing and validation. (c) Data Compilation and Analysis. CBBEP will ensure its subcontractor will acquire and compile data in a digital format that is readily accessible for processing. The PERFORMING PARTY shall also analyze water levels to exhibit tidal and meteorological responses, hydraulic analysis of the USGS station data to quantify transport between the delta distributaries and the Nueces River and Nueces Bay, and determination of the major controls on salinity in Corpus Christi and Nueces Bay. Ground -truth surveys will also be performed in order to gather bathymetric /hydraulic data, and will be coordinated with ecological (HRI) and vegetation field work (UTMSI) being performed by companion contracts. (d) Reports. CBBEP will or cause its subcontractor to prepare draft and final reports that will be comprehensive and shall describe and analyze the data collected during the project. The final report should also discuss any future implications for the study area and should contain recommendations on needs for additional investigation. 2. DELIVERABLES: (a) Preliminary Model. The PERFORMING PARTY shall submit a copy of the preliminary physical model executable software and model documentation. (b) Progress Report on Field Work. The PERFORMING PARTY shall submit a detailed progress report on field work performed to date. —139— Exhibit B Page 1 of 2 (c) Final Model. The PERFORMING PARTY shall submit a copy of the final physical model executable software and model documentation. (d) Draft Report. The PERFORMING PARTY shall submit a written draft report of work completed for review by the CBBEP Authorized Representative. The draft report shall include at a minimum the information requested in this Scope of Work. The draft report shall be submitted as one (1) unbound copy. PERFORMING PARTY shall also submit the draft report in an electronic format compatible with CBBEP software. (e) Final Report. The PERFORMING PARTY shall submit a written final report of work completed by no later than the date specified in the Schedule of Deliverables. The final report shall include at a minimum the information requested in this Scope of Work, including revisions requested by the CBBEP Authorized Representative. The final report shall be submitted as one (1) unbound copy. PERFORMING PARTY shall also submit the final report in an electronic format compatible with CBBEP software. 3. FEES. SUMMARY OF FEES: Basic Services: Original Contract Phase 1 Authorized Amendment No. 1 Phase 1 Authorized Amendment No. 2 Phase 2 Authorized Total Fee CBBEP Administration 29,500 307 14,150 43,957 Subtotal Basic Services $29,500 307 14,150 43,957 Additional Services: University of Texas Office of Sponsored Research 295,220 46,693 141,571 483,484 Subtotal Additional Services $295,220 $46,693 141,571 $483,484 Summary of Fees Basic Services Fees 29,500 307 14,150 43,957 Additional Services Fees 295,220 46,693 141,571 483,484 _Total of Fees $324,720 $47,000 $155,721 $527,441 —140— Exhibit B Pa•e2of2 \Mproject councilexhibits\exh8676c. dwg cifoxz (AN-yaw RESf'RRYOIR GEORGE WEST LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE PROJECT # 867E NUECES RIVER/DEL TA MONITORING & HYDRODYNAMIC TRANSPORT ANALYSIS AND MODELING -1 41 - CORPUS CHRISTI EXHIBIT C!TY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES PAGE: 9 of 1 DATE: 7/13/2010 17 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM July 20, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance abandoning and vacating a 1,509.327 - square foot portion of a ground utility easement, and a 1,917.239- square foot portion of an aerial easement, out of Tyler Subdivision, Block 1, Lots 2, 12, and 13, and Tract B; requiring the owner, BL Real Estate Holding Company, LP, to comply with the specified conditions; and declaring an emergency. ISSUE: The purpose for the closure of the utility easement is to allow for the future construction and development over said easement within the property. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: City Charter, Article IX. Section 4, requires Council approval to abandon and vacate any portion of an easement. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: Upon approval by Council and publication of the ordinance, all grants of easement closure must be recorded in the real property Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, in which the property is located. Prior to the building permit approval of construction, an up- to -date survey, abstracted for all easements and items of record, must be submitted to the Assistant City Manager of Engineering and Development Services. These requirements are in compliance with Ordinance no. 025816, approved 7- 13 -04. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance as presented on an emergency basis. \ittaoh, ,4>—/ Juan Perales, ., P.E., Assistant City anager Engineering & Development Services Email: JohnnyP @cctexas.com Telephone: 361 -826 -3828 Attachments: Exhibit A Background Information Exhibit B Site Location Maps and Detail Exhibit C Ordinance L:1PLN- DIR1special serv.lwillie medinalcity council agenda 2010lesm[- clo1Tyler Subd.M -145- AGENDA MEMORANDUM ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION PURPOSE OF CLOSURE AND BACKGROUND: Urban Engineering, on behalf of BL Real Estate Holding Company, LP, ('Owner "), is requesting the abandonment and vacation of a 1,509.327- square foot portion of a ground utility easement, and a 1,917.239- square foot portion of an aerial easement, out of Tyler Subdivision, Block 1, Lots 2, 12, and 13, and Tract B, to allow for the future construction and development over said easement. The easement to be abandoned and vacated is located in a "B -3" Business District. All public and franchised utilities were contacted. AEP has overhead electrical distribution facilities attached to AT &T owned poles and has no objections, but will require that the owner dedicate an alternate utility easement and that their facilities be relocated at Owner's expense. AT &T had no objections, but will require that the owner dedicate an alternate utility easement and that their facilities be relocated at Owner's expense. The City Water Department is requiring a set of approved drawings showing the rerouting of the water main prior to approval of the closure. None of the other city departments or franchised utility companies had any facilities within the utility easement. There were no objections regarding the proposed utility easement abandonment. Staff recommends that payment of fair market value be waived in accordance with City Sec. 49 -12 because Owner will be dedicating a new utility easement of equal or greater value to off -set the proposed abandonment and vacation of the 1,509.327- square foot utility easement. The owner has been advised of and concurs with the conditions of the easement abandonment and vacation. Owner must comply with all the specified conditions of the ordinance within 180 days of Council approval. Filing and recording of the utility easement abandonment and vacation is required by Ordinance No. 025816, after Ordinance is approved by City Council. Owner will be responsible for paying all fair market value fees and filing and recording cost. Development Services will be in charge of all payment processing responsibilities. EXHIBIT A A3-1311HM ANNETTE CLAUDIA LAGUNA WAL R SHORES SHORE Map tvAaoaMMAY RELDNOTES for the Dedication of o 10.00 foot wide utility Easement, being out of Lots 12 -14. Block 1, Tyler SabdMeion, Volume 35, Page 189, Map Records of Nuacee County, Texas. URBAf� ENGINEERING CORPUS CHRISTI. 1©LAS Fhp4tehalijegryolartitr 2. l -147- DATE: APR. 5, 2010 SCALE: NTS JOB NO.: 42066.00.00 SHEET: 2 OF 2 DRAWN BY: RLG 02010 by Urban Engineering EXHIBIT B CLAUDIA DRIVE Point of Commence/meat Fd. 5/5' LR. j ... L2.5.s.L.~ --g- -iftts- 0 Lot 13, Block 1 Lot 12. Black 1 Atli Vol. 35, Pg. 1B � � S Pg. ubdivision 189, iitgl Records of Hueco. County, Texas Records of Nueas County, Texas it 1,170.882 sq.ft. 1 ------ - --- -- pt°fg\ Aerial Easement i.------,_ N29'401 84.80' N29104'40"E 72.71' L 1 I - 829'04'40V 89.82' ...... l -7 L11— ----1 746.357 sq.ft. Aerial Easement 829'04'401"W 87.71 Line Bearing* Distance L1 S61'43.30 E 10.00' L4 N6 ' W 25.00' Tract 8 Tyler Subdivision Vol. 32, Pg. 38, Map Records of Nunes Countys Texas 30 AERIAL EANI NI... Fp. 169, Map Records of Moms Cormtj', reuas) Lot 2, Blade 1 Tyler SubdMdslon Val. 35, Pg. 189, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas Area of ground utility easement - 1,509.327 sq.ft. Area of aerial utiity easement • 1,917.239 sq.ft.* *Total area of aerial easement Tess the area of the ground easement. Exhibit B Map to accompany fieldnotee for the closure of a utility easement oui of Lots 2, 12 and 13. Block 1, Tyler Subdivision, a map of which is recorded in Volume 35, Page 169, Map Records of Nueces County. Texas and out of Tract B, Tyler Subdivision, a mop of which is recorded in Volume 32, Page 36, Map Records of Muscats County, Texas and that portion of the aerial easement shown on the recorded plat of Tyler Subdivision, a map of which Is recorded in Volume 35, Pogo 169, Mop Records of Nueces County, Texas which lies within the easement closure. URBAI ' aAtE '' 2 0 � "°2o 11 NGINEERING . JOB CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 420135.00.00 J SHEET. 1 OF 2 Fifa lob. r.>I, w x Alum my. in Roe 1 Page 1 of 3 ORDINANCE ABANDONING AND VACATING A 1,509.327- SQUARE FOOT PORTION OF A UTILITY EASEMENT OUT OF TYLER SUBDIVISION, BLOCK 1, LOTS 2, 12, AND 13, AND TRACT B; REQUIRING THE OWNER BL REAL ESTATE HOLDING COMPANY, LP, TO COMPLY WITH THE SPECIFIED CONDITIONS; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY WHEREAS, BL Real Estate Holding Company, LP (Owner), is requesting the abandonment and vacating of a 1,509.327- square foot portion of a utility easement out of Tyler. Subdivision, Block 1, Lots 2, 12, and 13, and Tract B, in order to allow for the future construction, and development over the existing utility easements. The easement to be abandoned and vacated is located in a "B -3" Business District; and WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearing was held on Tuesday, July 20, 2010, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that it is feasible and advantageous to the City of Corpus Christi to abandon and vacate said portion of the utility easement, subject to the provisions below, (Exhibit A) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. That a 1,509.327- square foot portion of a utility easement out of Block 1, Lots 2, 12, and 13 and Tract B, Tyler Subdivision located adjacent and southeast of Claudia Drive, as recorded in Volume 35, Page 169, and Volume 32, Page 36 of the Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, is abandoned and vacated, subject to Owner's compliance with the conditions specified in Section 2. below. SECTION 2. The abandonment and vacation of the above utility easement is conditioned upon Owner's compliance with the following: 1) Staff recommends that payment of fair market value be waived in accordance with City Sec. 49 -12 because Owner will be dedicating a new utility easement of equal or greater value to off -set the proposed abandonment and vacation of the 1,509.327- square foot utility easement. 2) Owner must comply with all the specified conditions of the ordinance within 180 days of Council approval. 3) Upon approval by Council and issuance of the ordinance, all grants of easement closures must by recorded at Owner's expense in the real property Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, in which the property is located. Page 2of3 Prior to the approval of building permit and construction, an up -to -date survey, abstracted for all easements and items of record, must be submitted to the Assistant City Manager for Engineering and Development Services. SECTION 3. That upon written request of the Mayor or five council members, copy attached, the City Council finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and shall take effect upon first reading as an emergency this the day of , 2010. ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa Joe Adame City Secretary Mayor, City of Corpus Christi APPROVED: 7 , 2010. Ai Deborah Waithe Assistant City Ato ney For City Attorney Page 3 of 3 Corpus Christi, Texas Day of , 2010 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings: I/we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council. Respectfully, Respectfully, Joe Adame Mayor Council Members The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr, Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott 18 NO ATTACHMENT FOR THIS ITEM 19 AGENDA MEMORANDUM AGENDA ITEM: PUBLIC HEARING — ZONING (City Council Action Date: July 20, 2010) Case No. 0610 -01: July 7, 2010 Ralph and Irma Rivera: The applicant is requesting a change in zoning from the "B-4" General Business District to the "1 -2" Light Industrial District to allow for a vehicle storage facility resulting in a change of land use from General Business to Light Industrial use. The property to be rezoned is 1.266 acres, Patrick Gardens Block 1, Lot 3A North 102.7'; Patrick Gardens portion Lot 1, North 125' of Lots 2 & 3; Patrick Gardens 50' x 132.5' of Lots 1 & 2; Patrick Gardens South 50' of Northeast 186.5' of Lot 1; Patrick Gardens 57' x 100.1' of Lot 1 & East 50.05' of Lot 2, located at 621 Mohawk Street PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION (June 9, 2010): Planning Commission and Staff recommends denial of the applicant's request to rezone the subject property to the "1 -2" Light Industrial District and in lieu thereof, approve a rezoning to B-4/SP General Business District with a Special Permit for allowance of a vehicle storage facility with the following seven (7) conditions: 1. Uses: All uses allowed in the "B-4" General Business District plus a vehicle storage facility with a watchman's or caretaker's quarters. 2. Screening: A solid screening fence shall be installed to a height of six (6) feet along the perimeter of the subject property less the south property line shared with one- family dwelling districts. The south property line shall have a solid screening fence eight (8) feet in height. 3. Directional Lighting: All overhead lighting shall not bleed into neighboring properties and be directed away from adjacent properties. 4. Closure of Driveways: Driveway access to subject property shall be closed on Cheyenne Street and Mohawk Street. 5. Hours of Operation: 8 A.M. to 5 P.M., Monday through Friday. After hours delivery and collection of vehicles shall be allowed. 6. Limitations: Vehicle stacking or installation of vehicle storage racks is prohibited. 7. Time Limit: Such Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within 12 months of the date of this ordinance, unless the property is being used as outlined in Condition #1 and in compliance with all other conditions. Applicant is in agreement with conditions of the Special Permit except for the time limit. -159- Agenda Memo Case No. 0630 -01 Ralph and Irma Rivera Page 2 REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of Planning Commission and Staffs Recommendation. STAFF SUMMARY: Request: The applicant is requesting a change in zoning from the "B-4" General Business District to the "1 -2" Light Industrial District to allow for a vehicle storage facility. Existing Land Uses: The subject property is currently used as a vehicle wrecker service and impound yard with a watchman's quarters. Commercial, light industrial, and vacant uses surround the property. Existing Zoning: The subject property is zoned "8 -4" General Business District. The "B-4" General Business District allows for single and multi - family residential, public uses (churches & schools), and commercial uses. This District requires a minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet, with a 20 foot building setback from the street right -of -way lines. Ten foot side or rear yard setbacks are required for single - family residential. Non- residential development permitted in this district does not require side and rear yard setbacks, except where the side or rear yard is located adjacent to a residential district, in which case the depth of those yards must be 10 feet. Proposed Zoning: The purpose of the "1 -2" Light Industrial District is to provide for light manufacturing, fabrication, warehousing, and wholesale distributing in high or low buildings with access to an arterial street, freeway, or railroad in central or outlying areas of the city. Residential uses are not allowed. The "1-2" Light Industrial District allows for a vehicle impound yard for wrecked vehicles in association with wrecker services. In Article 24 of the Zoning Ordinance, the "1 -2" District requires a minimum 20 -foot front yard setback and no side or rear yards unless abutting a residential district; then 10 -foot side and rear set back is required. The "I -2" District does not have a minimum lot size, lot frontage, height limitation, open space requirement or floor area intensity factor requirement. atA,Lt Juan Perales, J ., P.E. Assistant City Manager, Departments of Engineering and Development Services Email: johnnvppa,cctexas.com _ Phone: 361 -826 -3828 4\Z Attachments: 1. Zoning Report 2. Planning Commission Minutes 3. Ordinance (and site plan if appropriate) -160- CITY COUNCIL ZONING REPORT Case No.: 0610 -01 Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 9, 2010 Applicant: Ralph and Irma Rivera Owner Ralph and Irma Rivera Representative: Norma L. Rivera Address: 621 Mohawk Legal Description/Location: 1.266 acres, Patrick Gardens Block 1, Lot 3A North 102.7'; Patrick Gardens portion Lot 1, North 125' of Lots 2 & 3; Patrick Gardens 50' x 132.5' of Lots 1 & 2; Patrick Gardens South 50' of Northeast 186.5' of Lot 1; Patrick Gardens 57' x 100.1' of Lot 1 & East 50.05' of Lot 2, located at 621 Mohawk Street. a o g N ADP, Map & Violations From: "B -4" General Business District To: "I -2" Light Industrial District Area: 1.266 acres Purpose of Request: The applicant is requesting a change in zoning from the "B-4" General Business District to the "I -2" Light Industrial District to al ow for a vehicle storage facility. Site North South East Zoning. "B -4" General Business District "B-4" General Business District "R-1B" One - family Dwelling District "B-4" General Business District West "B-4" General Business District Existing Land Use Light Industrial Vacant Low Density Residential Commercial Vacant Future Land Use Commercial/ Light Industrial Commercial Low Density Residential Commercial Commercial Area Development Han: This tract of land is located in the Westside Area Development Plan and is planned for commercial uses. The proposed change in zoning is not consistent with the adopted Future Land Use Plan which designates the area for commercial and industrial uses. Map No.: 048,043 Zoning Violations: 1. Property is not zoned properly. The Zoning Ordinance requires "I -2" Light Industrial or "I -3" Heavy Industrial zoning for this vehicular impound use. 2. Lot 3A is platted, however, the remaining property is not platted. The City Charter requires property to be platted before a building permit or Certificate of Occupancy can be issued. 3. Illegal expansions - Zoning Ordinance does not permit expansion of non - conforming or illegal uses (or buildings) in area or usage including the recent addition of storage of DEA confiscated tractor trailers. Three modular offices currently located on site. 4. Inspections have not been called for or performed - for Certificate of Occupancy issued in 1996, the building permit issued in 2004 for an accessory building, or the driveway permit issued in 2004. —161— Zoning Report Case #:0610 -01, Ralph and Ir na Rivera Page 2 Staffs Summary: • Request: The applicant is requesting a change in zoning from the "B -4" General Business District to the "1 -2" Light Industrial District to allow for a vehicle storage facility. • Quick Summary Texas Wrecker was established at its current location (621 Mohawk St.) in the early 1970s. In 1973, Mr. Castillo and Mr. Rodriguez were approved a change of zoning from "A -2" Apartment House District to "B -4" General Business District. The 1973 rezoning stated that the proposed use was an auto repair business, which would have been allowed in a "B -4" District. The "B-4" District has never allowed for the current vehicle storage facility or impound yard use. In 1973, the Zoning Ordinance allowed for automobile wrecking yards, including outside storage, to be located in an industrial use district not the general business district. The current use is an illegal use not a non - conforming use. Texas Wrecker is not grandfathered at this location in a "B-4" General Business District. Texas Wrecker must obtain the proper zoning in order to continue operating at this location. The representative for Texas Wrecker has been advised that the subject properties are no longer consistent with the Platting Ordinance. Further expansion or construction of new buildings at this location would require replatting of the property since building permits cannot be issued on a non platted property. The representative met with Planning staff on May 6, 2010, and discussed possible conditions of a special permit in lieu of the "I -2" Light Industrial District, including limiting access to Morgan Ave., screening, directional lighting, and limitation of hours of operation. Texas Wrecker employs a watchman who stays after business hours. • Timeline of Texas Wrecker: 04/23/2007 - Complaint received by Code Enforcement stated that the lot is grandfathered as being able to hold junk vehicles, and now has little by little been expanded into neighbor's lots, which are not grand fathered and using them for the same use. 01/28/2008 — Code enforcement inspection confirmed that a wrecker service with outdoor storage of wrecked vehicles was in operation. 01/31/2008 - Notice was mailed to Ralph & Irma Rivera (PO Box 5128 CC, TX 78465) for zoning use violation, Zoning Ordinance Sec. 4 -4.01. No land may be used except for a purpose permitted in the district in which it is located 10/21/2009 - Another citizen complaint: 621 Mohawk is being used as storage /impound lot for seized transfer vehicles from the DEA. May also be operating as wrecker service with junked vehicles. 10/23/2009 — Code Enforcement Inspection found that location was being used for an impound lot and property was zoned `B -4" General Business District. —1 6 2— Zoning Report Case #:0610 -01, Ralph and Irma Rivera Page 3 10/27/2009 - Notices sent to owner (Ralph & Irma Rivera at PO Box 5128 and at 302 45th St.; Texas Wrecker at 62I Mohawk;) for zoning use violation, Zoning Ordinance Sec. 4 -4.01. No land may be used except for a purpose permitted in the district in which it is located and Zoning Ordinance Sec. 27-3M1.06 (fence required). 10/28/2009 - Notice resubmitted to owner to same addresses as 10/27/09 notices, noting different tax identification numbers. ] 0/30/2009 - Received letter from Hal George about the notice Texas Wrecker received. 1 ] /17/2009 — Code Enforcement re- inspection found property still in violation. 11/24/2009 - Final notice of violation mailed to same addresses as 10/27/09 notices. 12/2009 — Development Services & Code Enforcement staff & Attorneys met with Norma Rivera and her Attorney, Hal George. Staff advised they would research property history relative to whether the use is existing, non - conforming (grandfathered) or an illegal use that expanded over the years. 3/4/2010 — Staff provided a report to the owner's Attorney, Hal George, noting findings that the property would require rezoning and possible issues related to building permits. Staff advised the owner of upcoming zoning application deadlines. 3118110 — Staff followed up with Hal George, requesting zoning application submitted no later than March 31st. 4/05/10 -- Staff followed up with Hal George again, advising March 31st deadline was missed. Next zoning application deadline is April 9th. 4/09/10 — Norma Rivera calls city staff at 3:15 pm to discuss submitting zoning application. Over the phone, staff reviews zoning application requirements on -line, including the need to submit metes and bounds survey for a complete application to be accepted (since re- zoning would include un- platted lots). Summary of Issues 1. Improper Zoning — Impound yard is not allowed under current B -4 zoning. a. Use is Not Grandfathered — Property was rezoned to B -4 in 1973 for auto repair business. B4 allows automobile, boat, RV and mobile home sales and storage. Storage in this context has historically been interpreted by the City to mean accessory storage of automobiles, boats, RVs and mobile homes with the primary retail sales of these products. b. Illegal Expansion Over Years — Staff research (see attached) found the property illegally expanded over the years to become an impound lot. 1973 aerial photo shows land now operated by Texas Wrecker was vacant. Zoning Report Case #:0610 -01, Ralph and Irma Rivera Page 4 i. I -2: Uses including contractor shop, outside storage yard, coal and coke storage and sales, etc. ii. 1 -3: Uses including automobile wrecking, cars, and parts storage and sale; and junk and salvage storage 2. Platting — Lot 3A is platted, but the other tracts are not platted a. Property must be platted if the owner intends to get any future building permits to construct or enlarge any house or structure on the property. 3. Fire Code - Fire Department inspection is pending a. Platting — On street spacing fire hydrants every 300 feet b. Fire Code (building permits) -- To be determined based on Fire Department inspection. 4. Intersection Vision Obstruction — Vehicle operator line of sight at intersections cannot be obstructed by screening fence or other means. Vehicle operators (measured at operator's line of sight 10 feet away from intersections) need to be able to see appropriate distance each direction down the intersecting street. • Existing Land Uses: The subject property is currently used as a vehicle wrecker service and impound yard with a watchman's quarters. Commercial, light industrial, and vacant uses surround the property. • Existing Zoning: The subject property is zoned "B -4" General Business District. The "B-4" General Business District allows for single and multi - family residential, public uses (churches & schools), and commercial uses. This District requires a minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet, with a 20 foot building setback from the street right -of -way lines. Ten foot side or rear yard setbacks are required for single- family residential. Non - residential development permitted in this district does not require side and rear yard setbacks, except where the side or rear yard is located adjacent to a residential district, in which case the depth of those yards must be 10 feet. • Proposed Zoning: The purpose of the "I -2" Light Industrial District is to provide for light manufacturing, fabrication, warehousing, and wholesale distributing in high or low buildings with access to an arterial street, freeway, or railroad in central or outlying areas of the city. Residential uses are not allowed. The "I -2" Light Industrial District allows for a vehicle impound yard for wrecked vehicles in association with wrecker services. In Article 24 of the Zoning Ordinance, the "I -2" District requires a minimum 20 -foot front yard setback and no side or rear yards unless abutting a residential district; then 1 0 -foot side and rear set back is required. The "I -2" District does not have a minimum lot size, lot frontage, height limitation, open space requirement or floor area intensity factor requirement. • Transportation and Circulation: The subject property located south of Morgan Avenue, between Cheyenne Street and Mohawk Street. The Urban Transportation Plans proposes Morgan Avenue as an Al Minor Arterial Undivided, Cheyenne Street as a 01 Minor Residential Collector and Mohawk Street as a residential street. -164- Zoning Report Case #:0610 -01, Ralph and Irma Rivera Page 5 Street R.U.W. Street Morgan Avenue Cheyenne Street Mohawk Street Existing ROW and Paved Section 95'/ 64' paved, 4 -Lanes 50'/ 40' paved, 2 -Lanes 60'/ 40' paved, 2 -Lanes • Infrastructure Demand: Planned ROW and Paved Section Urban Transportation Plan No Change No Change Al, Minor Arterial Undivided CI, Minor Residential Collector No Change Residential Street Traffic Volume 2008 9,131 N/A N/A o Water: An 8 -inch water line runs along Cheyenne Street. o Wastewater: An 8 -inch wastewater line runs along Cheyenne Street. o Stormwater: Stormwater lines are long the north side of the property as does a storm drainage ditch. • Public Safety: o Police: The subject property is served by the Corpus Christi Police Department and is in the Directed Patrol District D50. Crime statistics up to 2005 show a decline from 1,003 crimes committed in 1993 to 947 in 2005. The last year for which statistics are available is 2005. o Fire: The closest Fire Station is number ten, located at 1550 Horne Road, approximately 2 miles from the subject property. • Environmental Constraints: o FEMA Flood Zone: Zone C: Area of minimal flood hazard o Soil Type: 100% (Ua) "Urban Land" • • • • • o Wetlands: ❑ Flight Zone: Slope: 0 to 1 percent Drainage class: Well drained Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None None None • Relationship to Smart Growth (See Attachment 8, Principles of Smart Growth): Staff has rated the relationship of the rezoning request to Smart Growth Principles by rating the rezoning a 25 on a scale of 100 points. • Comprehensive Plan Consistency: The adopted Future Land Use Plan designates the subject property for commercial uses, therefore, the proposed "1 -2" Light Industrial District is not consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. In addition to the Future Land Use -165- Zoning Report Case # :0610 -01, Ralph and Irma Rivera Page 6 Plan, policies from the Corpus Christi Policy Statements and the Area Development Plans are provided below. CORPUS CHRISTI POLICY STATEMENTS: • III. LAND USE: POLICIES - GENERAL: ZONING IN AN AREA SHOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN. The City Council adopted area development plans shall be used as a guideline for zone changes and subdivision development decisions. In addition, the area development plans will provide a legal foundation upon which the City Council and the Planning Commission should base their land development decisions. However, area development pans should be flexible and are subject to revisions if conditions have changed since approval of an area development plan and/or if the proposed changes are consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Policy Statements. Staff Comment: The property is within the area of the Southside Area Development Plan (SADP) which calls for the placement of commercial activities at Iocations with good access and high visibility. The subject property has the potential for good access and high visibility. Even though the subject property is earmarked to remain commercial, steps can be taken to protect adjacent land uses. • III. WHEN AREAS ARE CONVERTED FROM RESIDENTIAL TO INDUSTRIAL ZONING, ACTIONS TAKEN SHOULD INCLUDE PROTECTING THE REMAINING RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT. There are a number of industrially zoned areas containing housing concentrations that range in size from one -half to several full blocks. Although these areas are not suitable for continued long -term housing, they currently provide much needed housing for residents. If these areas are to be redeveloped for industrial uses, care must be taken to do so in a manner that is sensitive to the interests and needs of the residents. Staff Comment: Conditions are recommended to protect all adjacent land uses. a WESTSIDE AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN • C.6 —Policy Statement Industrial properties should be required to minimize undesirable "spillover effects" into residential and commercial areas (including noise, air pollution, visual blight, etc.) by means of property layout and organization of activities by screening and maintaining buffer areas or zones for their activities. Staff Comment: Buffering of offensive commercial and industrial uses is necessary where there is a direct residential adjacency and protection of the neighborhood is the goal. -166- Zoning Report Case #:0610 -01, Ralph and Irma Rivera Page 7 Plat Status: The subject property is not platted. PlanninE Commission and Staff Recommendation: Denial of the applicant's request to rezone the subject property to the "1 -2" Light industrial District and in lieu thereof, approve a rezoning to B-4/SP General Business District with a Special Permit for allowance of a vehicle storage facility with the following seven (7) conditions: 1. Uses: All uses allowed in the "B -4" General Business District plus a vehicle storage facility with a watchman's or caretaker's quarters. 2. Screening: A solid screening fence shall be installed to a height of six (6) feet along the perimeter of the subject property less the south property line shared with one - family dwelling districts. The south property line shall have a solid screening fence eight (8) feet in height. 3. Directional Lighting: All overhead lighting shall not bleed into neighboring properties and be directed away from adjacent properties. 4. Closure of Driveways: Driveway access to subject property shall be closed on Cheyenne Street and Mohawk Street. 5. Hours of Operation: 8 A.M. to 5 P.M., Monday through Friday. After hours delivery and collection of vehicles shall be allowed. 6. Limitations: Vehicle stacking or installation of vehicle storage racks is prohibited. 7. Time Limit: Such Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within 12 months of the date of this ordinance, unless the property is being used as outlined in Condition in and in compliance with all other conditions. Applicant is in agreement with conditions of the Special Permit except for the time limit. Number of Notices Mailed Total — 26 within 200 foot notification area; 4 outside notification area As of duly 6, 2010 Favor Opposition — 0 (inside notification area); 0 (outside notification area) — 0 (inside notification area); 0 (outside notification area) Attachments: 1. Neighborhood 2009 Aerial 2. Neighborhood — Existing Land Use 3. Neighborhood — Future Land Use 4. Site — 2009 Aerial 5. Site — Existing Zoning, Notice area, Ownership 6. Comments received from Public Notices mailed 7. Notice Mailing List 8. Smart Growth Principles -167- Refer to Map 2 for Ne,Vhborhood Land Use. ,z1so avRifa^bit'. -7 www cex&co IP ri - I-j7rd Fri r -r,--r. rr n n r r �lijirF1ITjn T!,S;;n CASE: 0610 -01 2.3. NEIGHBORHOOD - EXISTING LAND USE m/ LOP Estate Ia!sideetial -ER 0 agi t krdastriaf -LI Low Density RRS. - LDR ER HPary firdastrfaf -f# Aid Derrsriy Res. - new Pumic semi-13116/k -PSP El ifrgk Deasi y Res. -HDR ME Pair* - Mafia Horne • IWI • &Waage Corridor • DC tra:srrt -VAC a Conservateaa/Aeservatiarr -CP Plc; - :;:,:rraf [79ii -PQ 7 , __ ar - Connnen ial - COM VAC PO Map &aie: 4 :40,000 ERTY EASTERN ST 1 ER LWR CASE: 0610 -01 2.b. SITE- EXISTING LAND USE Esbite Residerrtial • ER Low Dewily Res. • LDR RE kid Derrsriy Mkt. - iYDR 1f9 Deese y Rot. -HDR _ ILI bee Howe - M-I llacaat -VAC 7)1 Prufessiorril QFIn: e • P() Commercial - CCM Map Scab.- 1:2,407 UgRt ken trfaf -Ll hkary prabrstrial • I# F�bAic Senri•PribLtc -PSP Arrt Dralwage Corridor - OC Co+rservarron/P4eservation -CP Water � s 1 OM= 110111MI. f� 1 1 Yr.1 Er LAA- ER CASE: 0810 -41 3. SITE FUTURE LAND USE Ayricul rrullkira1- AR IN Toarist • TOR Estate fesideetnal • ER - Researvb/Dasiness Park • REM Caw Dewily Res. • [DR 1121 Cigkt kern-trial - L I Md Derrsrty Res. - om heavy krdastrial • HI ifgk Density Res. •HDR Prrbkc Semi•public -PSP I4bbee Home • M1 ® Ft et VAC i L`a� .Trrt -VAC Lkrainage Corridor - DC Prates lours( Office • PD L d Mammal' • LP Commercial • CC,>M El Water CP t Conservation/Preservation - C.P Transpartatio# Plan .sue :. +�:tisac Expressways �-�-- Arterials —••_ Collectors Pkrat way -�-- Reikvad Map Scale: 1:2,400 SUBJECT PROPERTY •4, 10 BilMUM MIMI WM WM 12 9-A 9 -8 10 -A 13 iw ti7UBJE r �401‘FRT'Y 1 Afil ' 0 e . NM IMI 1-8 .. 1 aI 38-A Z CC Mil 14 19 1 15 16 17 18 EASTERN ST 0 ■ 36-C 14 36-A 15 16 35 -E 35 -c 43 17 18 23 c LQZA,y CASE: 0-10-01 4. SITE - EXISTING ZONING. NOTICE AREA & OWNERSHIP' !P-M Inen Marra 0t;64 :1 40111nenlx•a1;e DI:t I:I sJ- YDHN 0 -XUe 01:11:1 h7R::I.yy16YtQ Dl: a:1 4.4111e11FT0.11 :1 DC 11:1 IeI I -si I, o1 Rulne : DI:11:1 leIjhl•ae1r.W Fll:lne:: DI: F1.:1 F s''1c.1 I 1.0:1k:: 11,11:1 ba•I.. 1;53.1 Re: Dk :: DI:11:1 [pair -- : I 4: i Geneld LIr1r:: D1:tI:l %110s Du:11k:: 01 :11:1 Pfluais LU:Inr:: :le DI: 11:1 •:.1: •3-171 :1iea :h te:Ii DI:I. Fah. Puy PL: IF :I IP 1aIcaF Nuy LYNwsI P1< :<e :ulcn F1 F: Fi PDD P. P -SF P -1• P= Pe P -111 :P T I+ T -ID 7 I•: A uull D01111; 1101 Ms1I Whl DPW: U W1 H :11:1 H1 r.j 17110 aal Dt: Iltl Plaik. YI'l1 De•!el!,.Ine111 ^I1 FSn1G D7,SAl71 D1:11 :1 One F 7d1; Op&lirg 10:11 :l One F aDIF6 D1eeI1I 01:11:1 Maio D'AMIIp DIH:I ^ - i y,;lL' DIP11ty 111.11:1 Pr • -..; __: lah Il:11c1 TrNYaxu =• C "■T!I,, 111 :11 ?I :t. e i j Tt111111 Aa:rl Tales hay It:IIc1 L1.rW:1.1 P4 Maus Part DI: 1I-: 1310nlp:lle•1 ■:1fl1 J 11:1:1!11 bl:Ykl V d :i iii 1 ".:'2.',:!.7.T..T.2 A ,t SCIBJEGT PROPERTY -- MATH) I 1 Itrof -177- COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM PUBLIC NOTICES MAILED Case No: 0610 -01 Name: Ralph and Irma Rivera I. Notices returned from WITHIN the 200 -foot notification area: (Note: The number(s) next to name corresponds to the attached map.) Total number mailed: Returned undeliverable: 26 0 Favor: 0 Opposition: 0 II. Responses received from OUTSIDE the 200 -foot notification area: Total number mailed: Returned undeliverable: 4 0 Favor: 0 Opposition: 0 III. Responses received from owners /applicants of subject area: Favor: 0 Opposition: 0 IV. Unsolicited responses received concerning subject area: Total number mailed: 0 Returned undeliverable: 0 Favor: 0 Opposition: 0 H:1PLN- D1R1SHAREDII. Planning Commission1201 0 PC12010 Public Comments10510.0I Ralph and Irma Rivera.doc Nno $ n 2888 ml MTV Kg g y N O N !II Min L 7 Y 3 Y !f F 4 x x F x. 1 g .X F.0 F. 83333 Eg oc000 EELEUx x 'd"'ui" a�u. .+o�m.e e�iri.a wr.��od oo ra � anti. -ate :u:ii �rpin �a�^is'isiii$iiiii � N IY 111111111111111111111EIVI ° t., �i ���jyynQnq i F, c A E!h0=! H E 5 g y z WO mIrig9" A5 c ro 003 4� CC '.}5{ ro X R i /n Vil3aX §ic9:�' �� �NWEtl g @p �8niwo Rm`yo1 yv E l E ; 2 y y y I y S t m 2 m A f iyn� r{ C N a K g 1 i a'v ■ a m A l N x S j G y A p F, µ y 4 = m A CC H p P 9NIVH019 [C9 VAC(VI 9291 9DNIfZ 3NN303H 619 88 8888 8$8$$8515 §B §5E §E§U§H§51,1 5 NH agggg N IN l g3R3ggna3M Vgi 22 0 0 %0 0 • za A AA OPPOP 0000 v v ° zzzzz �N g(o(]] x [off y p q • W • Qi —180— c c c s v 9. a v 9 v 9 1 s a c c a i i i i i §§Piiiingvn aynynt Ell y11;; Tm n y y yy _^ A ]no �~ A A n A nn bn n n n ^ Y T a A P 9 P�7 P P �R7 X�5 X�7%¢+ X%% 2 2 1 2 c F .1 m N N E E E aP E E 5 E E 50 E E a s A wg ,Q°maA�iN" ff" amlNl F �$ m$ x� =���n v,�. .Wg ogRr- --8!="' Y y D V y y , - N ,+ r Ao x R°�1 r°� 8 m p, c- Y O N O rz "'°47, ; 8 0 u ao x o m o "',..-r' w $ o N H n 8b w aftEME r$.�. �amwg Zg$ E°w a ora .-o W 003.- Moavn 0 a 8T.: ZEVItr, ,' r�1 8wH°'.- r�m8■2°wm 0000000000000000000 0 o2 � °m °m °m °m m 0000 000 0gggogE2EEn2ZEgax SMART GROWTH COMPARISON: ATTACHMENT 8 Polices listed below are taken from "Getting to Smart Growth 11: 100 More Policies for Implementation` provided by the Smart Growth Network. These policies am intended to offer an alternative approach to development and should not be viewed as development mandates. Although encouraged based on their ability to improve the city's function and livability, these policies am in no way meant to serve as additional :tevelopment requirements or regulations. Smart Growth policies for Corpus Christi merely offer viable development options capable of effectively supporting economic development and jobs; creating strong neighborhoods with a range of housing, commercial, and traffic calming options for increasing populations and growth; and achieving healthy communities that provide families with a clean environment. Zoning Case:0610 -01 From: "B -4" General Business District To "I.2" Light Industrial District Will the request promote development that fosters the following? Answer Pts. Weight Score 1. Mix land uses. 0 Project provides a new type of development to an existing neighborhood such as 3 uses added 3 employment, housing, retail, civic, educational, cultural, recreation, neighborhood- serving retail /service? 2 uses added 1 use added 2 1 x 3 0 Reuses closed, decommissioned, or obsolete institutional uses? Yes 1 No 0 x2 0 Project is mixed use (any combination of housing, retail, office, commercial, public 4 + uses 3 0 buildings, etc.) 3 + uses 2 x2 2 + uses 1 2. Takes advantage of compact building design. 0 Utilizes reduced setbacks and/or compact development that supports more stores YeS 1 and restaurants within a neighborhood boundary, or creates opportunities to pursue 0 x 3 a range of activities in a small area? No 0 Manages and effectively provides a transition between higher and lower-density neighborhoods? Yes No 1 0 x 2 0 3. Creates a range of housing opportunities and choices. 0 Implements a range of housing options with a variety of types and unit sizes within Yes 1 the community? (condos, townhomes, single - family, apartments) No 0 x 3 0 Utilizes private and public property tax exemption programs or local, state, or federal funding incentives for mixed - income developments and/or low - income homeowners and individuals to reduce building costs and uses available resources Yes No 1 0 x 3 more effectively? Cl The project promotes development (residential, commercial, office) with a wide Yes 1 range in pricing available for varying income levels for sale or lease? No 0 x 3 0 4. Creates walkable neighborhoods. 0 Promotes development close to schools, corner stores, dry cleaners, restaurants, and Yes 1 other services that promotes walkable communities and reduces long - distance 0 x 3 commutes? No 0 Will incorporate sidewalks or a bike or pedestrian path into the final development or connects to existing sidewalks? Yes No 1 0 x 3 0 Promotes development so children are close enough to walk to school? Yes ] No 0 x 2 0 5. Fosters distinctive, attractive communities with a strong sense of place. 0 The building is an existing building that is historic in any way, or provides focus on Yes ] a historical, cultural, or natural attributes? No 0 x 2 0 Utilizes established standards for building size, density, and architectural standards and locates development in areas that reflect the "vision" of the Area Development Yes 1 x 2 Plan, the Future Land Use Map, and/or Comprehensive Plan? No 0 0 Promotes shopping and makes retail centers distinctive and attractive destinations Yes 1 and gathering places where residents frequent on the weekends? No 0 x 3 0 Revitalizes the waterfront, beach, or bay areas? Yes 1 No 0 x3 0 Does the project remove blight from its neighborhood? Yes 1 No 0 x 3 0 —181— 6. Preserves open space, farmland, natural beauty, and critical environmental areas. 0 Preserves critical areas for water - quality protection including wetlands, riparian corridors, floodplains, and retains or creates buffer zones surrounding these areas; utilizes land management techniques, to decrease the amount of pollution entering Yes No 1 0 x 4 the water system and preserve wildlife habitats? 0 Does the project implement green building techniques or standards for reducing Yes 1 environmental impacts? No 0 x 3 • 0 Supports tree preservation onsite and/or provides adequate tree landscaping (at a Yes 1 minimum) to replace trees being removed? No 0 x 3 _ 0 Provides community green open space or includes useable green space for outdoor Yes 1 recreation and preserves views of scenic, historic or cultural areas? No 0 x 3 0 Does it avoid the acquisition and change in use of operating farms or prime Yes 1 farmland? No 0 x 2 0 7. Stren _ hens and directs develo + ment toward existin , communities. 15 Is the project located adjacent to existing infrastructure; roads, water, sewer? Existing 3 Service is; Less than 1/4 mile 2 x 4 1/4 to '/2 mile 1 'Y2 + miles 0 12 Is the availability of existing public services, such as police, fire, schools and Yes 1 health, sufficient to serve the project? No 0 x 3 3 Is the project a redevelopment of an existing building or brownfield area that would Yes 1 make the property a productive piece of land? No 0 x 3 0 Will the project encourage commercial and retail investment in underserved Yes 1 communities? No 0 x 3 0 Does the project enhance the use of existing public outdoor recreation facilities or Yes 1 areas, such as parks, fishing piers, boat storage areas, or rental equipment? No 0 x 2 0 Is the project in an area with declining school enrolment that threatens its neighborhood schools with closure or support residential use in areas with Yes 1 x 2 historically declining school enrollment? No 0 0 8. Provides a variety of transportation choices. 6 The proposed project is accessible by multiple modes of transportation (auto, bus, rail, biking, walking)? 3 modes 2 modes 2 1 x 3 3 The project within walking distance to public transit? (Within 1,000 ft) Yes 1 No 0 x 3 3 9. Makes develo • ment decisions • redictabie, fair and cost effective. 3 Yes 1 The sr° ect is consistent with the Future Land Use Ma• and Com irehensive Plan? No 0 x 2 0 The project is consistent with the Area Development Plan? Yes I No 0 x 2 0 Is the proposed project located along transportation corridors where traffic is funneled to right-of-ways capable of handling the increased traffic without si_nificantly decreasin: the trans @ortation levels of service for surrounding areas? Yes 0 x 3 3 Will the project design incorporate systems for reducing storm water runoff or provide onsite retention? Yes No 1 0 x 3 0 Does project contribute to the economic vitality and diversity of the community or propose commercial or industrial development in areas with high unemployment or chronic poverty? Yes 0 x 3 0 Point Grading System: Smart Growth Rating Total Points 25 0 -20 pts = * ® 21 -39 pts.= ** ❑ 40 -59 pts = * * * 60 -79 pts = * * * * ❑ 50 -100 pts = MINUTES REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers- City Hall June 9, 2010 5:30 P.M. COMMISSIONERS: Rudy Garza, Chairman A. Javier Huerta, Vice - Chairman James Skrobarczyk John C. Tamez Johnny R. Martinez Evon J. Kelly Govind Nadkarni Mark Adame Absent John Taylor STAFF: Johnny Perales, P.E., Assistant City Manager, Engineering and Development Services *Arrived 5:41 Faryce Goode Macon, Assistant Director of Development Services/Planning Andrew Dimas, City Planner Miguel S. Saldana, AICP, Senior City Planner Deborah Brown, Assistant City Attorney Elena Juarez Buentello, Recording Secretary Si usted quiere dirigirse a la comision y su ingles es Iimitado, habra un interprete de espafiol a ingles en Ia junta para ayudarle I. CALL TO ORDER A quorum was declared and the meeting was called to order by Chairman Garza at 5:32 p.m. B. ZONING 1. New Zoning a. Case No. 0610-01 —Ralph and Irma Rivera: A change of zoning from the "B-4" General Business District to the "I -2" Light Industrial District resulting in a change of land use from general business to light industrial The property to be rezoned is a 1.266 acre tract located at 621 Mohawk St, Patrick Gardens portion of Lot 1, north 125' of Lots 2 & 3; Patrick Gardens 50' x 132.5' of Lots 1 & 2; Patrick Gardens south 50' of northeast 186.5' of Lot 1; Patrick Gardens north 102.7' of Lot 3A, Block 1; Patrick Gardens 57' x 100.1' of Lot 1 & east 50.05' of Lot 2 Andrew Dimas, Development Services, presented New Zoning item "a ", Case No. 0610 -01 via Apple Keynote, stating the applicant is requesting a change of zoning from the "3 -4" General Business District to the "I -2" Light Industrial District. Mr. Dimas stated Texas Wrecker was established at 621 Mohawk Street in the early 1970's. In 1973, a change of zoning from "A -2" Apartment House District to the "3-4" General Business District, with the proposed use being an auto repair business, which would have been allowed in a `B-4" General Business District. The "3-4" General Business District has never allowed for the current vehicle storage facility or impound yard use. In 1973 The Zoning Ordinance allowed for automobile wrecking yards, including outside storage, to be located in an industrial use. The current use is an illegal use not a non - conforming use. Texas Wrecker is not grandfathered at this location in a "B -4" General Business District and must obtain the proper zoning in order to continue operation at this location. Mr. Dimas stated the following zoning violations: —183— Planning Commission Minutes June 9, 2010 Page 2 • Property is not zoned properly. The Zoning Ordinance requires at a minimum the "I -2" Light Industrial or "1 -3" Heavy Industrial for vehicular impound use. • Lot 3A is platted, however, the remaining property is not platted. The municipal code and platting ordinance requires property to be platted before a building permit of Certificate of Occupancy can be issued. • Illegal expansions — Zoning Ordinance does not permit expansion of non- conforming or illegal uses (or buildings). The recent addition of storage of Drug Enforcement Administration confiscated tractor trailers has occurred. Three modular offices are also currently located on site. • Inspections have not been requested or performed for the following: o Certificate of Occupancy issued in 1996 o Building permit issued in 2004 o Driveway permit issued in 2004 Mr. Dimas stated staff is recommending denial of the applicant's request to rezone the subject property to the "I -2" Light Industrial District and in lieu thereof, approval of a rezoning to "B -4 /SP" General Business District with Special Permit for allowance of a vehicle storage facility with the following six (6) conditions: 1. Uses: All uses allowed in the "B -4" General Business District plus a vehicle storage facility with a watchman or caretaker quarters. 2. Screening: Existing metal fence shall be improved to screen vehicle storage facility from view of public. 3. Directional Lighting: All overhead lighting shall not bleed into neighboring properties and be directed away from adjacent properties and be directed away from adjacent properties. 4. Closure of Driveways: Driveway access to subject property shall be closed on Cheyenne Street and Mohawk Street. 5. Hours of operation: Sam to 5pm Monday through Friday. 6. Time Limit: Such Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within 12 months of the date of this ordinance, unless the property is being used as outlined in Condition #1 and in compliance with all other conditions In response to Commissioner Skrobarczyk, Mrs. Faryce Goode Macon, Development Services stated there would be no ingress/egress on Cheyenne or Mohawk because the neighborhood and street destinations are residential. In response to Commissioner Skrobarczyk, Mrs. Goode Macon stated the original zoning was instated many years ago. Public hearing was opened. Joe Omani, 3529 Morgan, came forward in opposition. Mr. Omani stated he has invested $4 million dollars in his property for the Texas Adult Day Care. Mr. Omani stated he feels the property is a "junk yard' and accounted the multiple disabled trailers stating the area is not aesthetically pleasing. Mr. Omani stated a desire for the City to enforce the current code and urged the Planning Commission to not grant the change of zoning request. Mr. Omani reinforced his request by stating there are no other light industrial properties in the area. —184— Planning Commission Minutes June 9, 2010 Page 3 John Bell, legal representative for the applicant, came forward. Mr. Bell refuted the statement by Mr. Omani referring to the property as a "junk yard ". Mr. Bell stated the property is a nonconforming, pre - existing use. Mr. Bell stated the applicant is amenable to the conditions of staff proposed Special Permit and the applicant is attempting to improve the neighborhood. In response to Vice -Chair Huerta, Ms. Norma Rivera, applicant, came forward and stated she is still researching the costs involved with screening and is does not currently have an estimate. Vice -Chair Huerta stated a 6' screening fence would not be sufficient. In response to Commissioner Martinez, Mr. Bell stated the amount of time impound vehicles are stored is dependent upon storage fees and there is no fixed time Iimit. Vice -Chair Huerta stated although he understands the property's current and proposed use is for vehicle impound, the appearance of the property is that of a "junk yard ". In response to Vice -Chair Huerta, Mr. Bell stated the applicant is willing to add a condition that would prohibit vehicle stacking. In response to Commissioner Taylor, Mr. Bell stated the business on the property would be open to the public Monday through Friday from Sam to 5pm. Mrs. Deborah Brown, Legal Department, stated as the Special Permit conditions currently read, there could be no business activity after 5pm. Mr. Omani, came forward once more, in opposition. Mr. Omani stated there are pieces of junk metal on the property and stated he would like a time limit as to the storage of the impounded vehicles. Mr. Omani reiterated the applicant's are using the property illegally and the City should enforce the current ordinance. Public hearing closed. Commissioner Skrobarczyk stated on the aerial view the storage facility near the property appears to be zoned "R -1B" One- family Residential. Commissioner Martinez stated he would be in favor of a Special Permit but would like to see the applicant make an effort to better maintain the property. Commissioner Nadkarni stated he would like the following conditions added to the Special Permit: 8' screening fence along residential adjacency, allowing vehicle after hour drop off and prohibiting of vehicle stacking of the use of vehicle racks on the property. Vice -Chair Huerta stated he is in favor of the screening requirement as part of the Special Permit but still has other issues with the change of zoning application. Mrs. Goode Macon stated a 6' screening fence may not provide the intended screening. -185- Planning Commission Minutes June 9, 2010 Page 4 In response to Mrs. Goode Macon, Commissioner Skrobarczyk stated he feels an 8' fence would be too costly because it requires hiring an engineer. Chairman Garza stated a 6' screening fence would be sufficient. In response to Chairman Garza, Commissioner Martinez stated there are concerns for the residential properties adjacent to the back of the property and screening for those residents should be taken into consideration. Commissioner Taylor stated a proposed compromise including a 6' screening fence along the property with an 8' screening fence along the residential adjacency. Planning Commission recommended the following: Denial of the applicant's request to rezone the subject property to the "I -2" Light Industrial District and in lieu thereof, approve a rezoning to "B -4 /SP" General Business District with a Special Permit for allowance of a vehicle storage facility with the following seven (7) conditions: 1. Uses: All uses allowed in the "B-4" General Business District plus a vehicle storage facility with a watchman's or caretaker's quarters. 2. Screening: A solid screening fence shall be installed to a height of six (6) feet along the perimeter of the subject property less the south property line shared with one - family dwelling districts. The south property line shall have a solid screening fence eight (8) feet in height. 3. Directional Lighting: All overhead lighting shall not bleed into neighboring properties and be directed away from adjacent properties. 4. Closure of Driveways: Driveway access to subject property shall be closed on Cheyenne Street and Mohawk Street. 5. Hours of Operation: 8 A.M. to 5 P.M., Monday through Friday. After hours delivery and collection of vehicles shall be allowed. 6. Limitations: Vehicle stacking or installation of vehicle storage racks is prohibited. 7. Time Limit: Such Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within 12 months of the date of this ordinance, unless the property is being used as outlined in Condition 41 and in compliance with all other conditions. Motion to approve staff's recommendation for New Zoning item "a" was made by Commissioner Martinez and seconded by Commissioner Nadkarni. Motion passed unanimously with Commissioner Adame being absent. -186- Page 1 of 4 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UPON APPLICATION BY RALPH AND IRMA RIVERA, BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP IN REFERENCE TO 1.266 ACRES, PATRICK GARDENS BLOCK 1, LOT 3A NORTH 102.7'; PATRICK GARDENS PORTION LOT 1, NORTH 125' OF LOTS 2 & 3; PATRICK GARDENS 50' X 132.5' OF LOTS 1 & 2; PATRICK GARDENS SOUTH 50' OF NORTHEAST 186.5' OF LOT 1; PATRICK GARDENS 57' X100.1' OF LOT 1 & EAST 50.05' OF LOT 2 , FROM "B-4" GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT TO "B-4/SP" GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT WITH A SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR A VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITY, SUBJECT TO SEVEN (7) CONDITIONS; AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING A REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and recommendations concerning the application of Ralph and Irma Rivera, for amendment to the City of Corpus Christi Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, June 9, 2010, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, July 20, 2010, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended by changing the zoning on 1.266 acres, Patrick Gardens Block 1, lot 3A North 102,7'; Patrick Gardens portion lot 1, North 125' of lots 2 & 3; Patrick Gardens 50' x 132.5' of lots 1 & 2; Patrick Gardens South 50' of Northeast 186.5' of lots 1; Patrick Gardens 57' x 100.1' of lot 1 & East 50.05' of lot 2, located at 621 Mohawk, from "B-4" General Business District to "B-4/SP" General Business District with a Special Permit to allow for a vehicle storage facility, subject to seven (7) conditions. (Zoning Map 048043) (Exhibit A) SECTION 2. That the Special Permit granted in Section 1 of this ordinance is subject to the following seven (7) conditions: i" is 1LEG- CIR1SharerALEGAL- DEV.SVCS12410 Agenda17.20- 101CASE NO. 0610 -01 RALPH AND IRMA RIVERAI0610-01.RaIph.Irma.Rivera.B4- 184SP.Zaning- Special Permit.Doc —187— Page 2 of 4 1, Uses: All uses allowed in the "B-4" General Business District plus a vehicle storage facility with a watchman's or caretaker's quarters. 2. Screening: A solid screening fence shall be installed to a height of six (6) feet along the perimeter of the subject property less the south property line shared with one- family dwelling districts. The south property line shall have a solid screening fence eight (8) feet in height. 3. Directional Lighting: All overhead lighting shall not bleed into neighboring properties and be directed away from adjacent properties. 4. Closure of Driveways: Driveway access to subject property shall be closed on Cheyenne Street and Mohawk Street. 5. Hours of Operation: 8 A.M. to 5 P.M., Monday through Friday. After hours delivery and collection of vehicles shall be allowed. Limitations: Vehicle stacking or installation of vehicle storage racks is prohibited. 7. Time Limit: Such Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within 12 months of the date of this ordinance, unless the property is being used as outlined in Condition #1 and in compliance with all other conditions. SECTION 3. That the official Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is amended to reflect the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance made by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 4. That the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, approved on the 27th day of August, 1937, as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date, remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. That to the extent that this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance represents a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by this ordinance. SECTION 6. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 7. A violation of this ordinance or requirements implemented under this ordinance constitutes an offense punishable under Section 35 -3 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Corpus Christi. H:1LEG- DIR.Shared \LEGAL- DEV.SVCS12010 Agenda7- 20- 101CASE NO. 0610 -01 RALPH AND IRMA RIVERA10610-01.Ralph.Irma.Rivera.B4- B4SP.Zoning- Special Permlt,Doc —188— Page 3 of 4 SECTION 8. That publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 9. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and suspends the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed upon first reading as an emergency measure on this day of , 2010. ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa Joe Adame City Secretary Mayor, City of Corpus Christi APPROVED: 7 /!f , 2010 far- eborah Walther Bro Assistant City Attorne For City Attorney H:\ LEG- DIRlSharedlLEGAL- DEV.SVCS12010 Agenda17- 20- 101CASE NO. 0610 -01 RALPH AND IRMA RIVERAl0610-o1.Ralph.Irma.Rivera.B4- B4SP.Zoning- Special Perrnit.Doc -189— Page 4 of 4 Corpus Christi, Texas day of , 2010 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance, an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings. I /we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council. Respectfully, Respectfully, Joe Adame Mayor, City of Corpus Christi Council Members The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott H: 1LEG- DIR1Shared\LEGAL- DEV.SVCS12010 Agenda17- 20- 101CASE NO. 0610-01 RALPH AND IRMA RIVERA10610-01.Ralph.Irma.Rivera.B4- B4SP.Zoning- Special Permit.Doc —190— lit I WNW, i7M7 M=- I I am-19M 20 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: July 20, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: A. ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI BUDGET FOR THE ENSUING FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING AUGUST 1, 2010; TO BE FILED WITH THE COUNTY CLERK; APPROPRIATING MONIES AS PROVIDED IN THE BUDGET; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE. B. ORDINANCE TO RATIFY INCREASE OF $1,380,315 IN PROPERTY TAX REVENUES FROM LAST YEAR'S OPERATING BUDGET AS REFLECTED IN THE 2010 -2011 OPERATING BUDGET. ISSUE: The City Charter requires the City Council adopt the annual operating budget appropriating proposed revenues and expenditures prior to August 1g of each year. FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION: REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of Ordinance as submitted. ISSUE: The Local Government Code now requires municipalities to ratify any increases in property tax revenues from the previous year. The attached Ordinance complies with the new requirement. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of Ordinance ratifying the increase in property tax revenues from last year's operating budget. Attachment: Attachment A —195— Eddie Houlihan Assistant Director of Management & Budget 361 - 826 -3792 E:.ddie F or r- :ccie gas.com BACKGROUND INFORMATION Section 102.007 of the Local Government Code now requires the governing body of a municipality to ratify the property tax revenue increase reflected in the Budget separate and in addition to adopting the budget if more tax revenue will be raised by the Proposed FY 2010 -11 budget than in the previous year. Attachment A - Schedule of Adjustments City of Corpus Christi Amendment to the FY 2010 -2011 Proposed Budget Hotel Occupancy Fund -1030 Proposed Expenditures 9,330,575 Adjustments: Decrease Transfer to Debt Service (500,000) Add Contingency Marketing Reserve 500,000 Total Adjusted Expenditures $ 9,330,575 General Oblitation Debt Service Fund 2010 Proposed Revenues Adjustments: Decrease Transfer for Debt - Hotel Occupancy Tax Fund 35, 743,473 (500,000) Total Adjusted Expenditures $ 35,243,473 TOTAL AMENDED PROPOSED REVENUES 673,083,278 TOTAL AMENDED PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 668,617,786 —197— AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI BUDGET FOR THE ENSUING FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING AUGUST 1,2010; TO BE FILED WITH THE COUNTY CLERK; APPROPRIATING MONIES AS PROVIDED IN THE BUDGET; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE. WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Corpus Christi (City), pursuant to Article IV, Section 2 of the City Charter, did submit to the City Council a budget proposal (Budget Proposal) of the revenues of the City, and the expenses of conducting the affairs thereof for the ensuing fiscal year beginning August 1, 2010, and ending July 31, 2011, and which Budget Proposal had been compiled from detailed information from the several departments, divisions, offices of the City, in accordance with the City Charter provision referenced above; and WHEREAS, the members of the City Council have received and studied the City Manager' s Budget Proposal and have called and held the proper hearing in accordance with Section 102.006, Texas Local Government Code, on the Budget Proposal; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2(f), Article IV, of the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, the City Council must appropriate such sums of money as provided in the Budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Budget of the City of Corpus Christi, covering proposed expenditures amounting to $668,617,786 and estimated revenues amounting to $6737583,278 $673,083,278 for the Fiscal Year beginning August 1, 2010, and ending July 31, 2011, as submitted by the City Manager, with modifications directed by the City Council and recorded in its minutes being incorporated by reference, is adopted. SECTION 2. That upon the passage of this ordinance certain sums of money from all sources of City revenues, as described in the Budget, shall be and they are appropriated to cover the sums for expenditures and investments as provided for each of the several funds in the Budget, as modified by the City Council. Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary, the City Manager is authorized to make transfers within departments, divisions, purposes, or funds, provided it is in accordance with applicable law. SECTION 3. Police Officer Positions The number of positions budgeted for each police officer classification in the Police Department shall be: H:1LEG- DIR1Lisa12010 Ordinance1FY10 -11 Budgetv2.doc Police officer and senior police officer - 392* Police Lieutenant - 36 Police Captain - 15 Police Commander - 6 Assistant Police Chief - 1 Police Chief - 1 FY10 -11 TOTAL 451 * These positions are interchangeable. Any police officer may become a senior police officer after 30 months' service by passing a pass /fail exam. This number may be temporarily increased by graduates from a police academy authorized by the City Manager, which temporary increase shall be reduced to authorized strength through attrition. SECTION 4. Firefighter Positions The number of positions budgeted for each firefighter classification in the Fire Department shall be: Firefighter - 134* Firefighter 11 -EMS -109 Firefighter 11 - Engineer - 73 Fire Captain - 82 Battalion Chief - 10 Assistant Fire Chief - 4 Deputy Fire Chief - 1 Fire Chief - 1 FY10 -11 TOTAL 414 *This number may be temporarily increased by graduates from a fire academy authorized by the City Manager, which temporary increase shall be reduced to authorized strength through attrition. SECTION 5. That upon final passage of this budget ordinance, a true certified copy of this same ordinance shall be transmitted by the City Manager to the County Clerk of Nueces County, Texas, pursuant to Section 102.011, Texas Local Government Code. The budget shall also be part of the archives of the City. SECTION 6. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision in this ordinance be given full force and effect for its purpose. H:1LEG- DIR \Lisa12010 ordinancelFY10 -11 Budgetv2.doc That the foregoing ordinance was read for the reading on this the. 1 3 ""-day of j A Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick +Vo That the foregoing ordinance was read for the the day of , 2010, Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick PASSED AND APPROVED, this the ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED as to form: By: (eri first time and passed to its second , 2010, by the following vote: Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott second time and passed finally on this by the following vote: Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott day of , 2010. viLit 1Y, 7-013 Lisa Aguilar, istant City Attorney for the City A rney Joe Adame Mayor ORDINANCE TO RATIFY INCREASE OF $1,380,315 IN PROPERTY TAX REVENUES FROM LAST YEAR'S OPERATING BUDGET AS REFLECTED IN THE 2010 -2011 OPERATING BUDGET. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the City Council ratifies the increase of $1,380,315 in property tax revenues from last year's operating budget as reflected in the 2010 -2011 Operating Budget. That the foregoing ordinay�ce was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the a.3 day of r,� , 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame Priscilla G. Leal A70 Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2010. ATTEST: Armando Chapa Joe Adame City Secretary Mayor APPROVED as to form: 41,46 7, do t ,) By: Lisa Aguile Assistant City Attorney for the City Attorney Fund services nvestment in our Genera 4-J (n O E w O 4 J (n 4J ro u a) 0 . > c %. O a) ro '�_n cn 4-) 4 J cn > V) -0 E _a ro 3 a) cn s ro 0) a) O O O W •v o D O V Ta >� - a) O v � ra •� 0) D w �o s Ln v ro a_ ro c V E ° D O Li) E V v ro LL O Z W W Z W Ct 0 Ow I— 01 Q QD D0 QW ct p0 0 U 0 I-ct = Owp zZ� �vWi 0 2w 0 <w U D� = we = Urn I— ct 0 o°E J< Li j JaVI J cc' W J w J m LL W 0 WSW J L7� m Z J w 0 2 0 p 0Pu z mw m 00De Q 0v�i N , , 0 vw� o J (0 1— w 0 z 0_ Q —0 • w Xz� �� a) -0 u wpz v �E Ct p WU X w W 2 z W . _ W p Z U ( W w `nD" w =I- n� ,_ QU Wes- W 1- O �✓ J p -0 tO Z - D >W I—u) Nm O C Li.' Li) m0 pU ln�J I— z J W Q z W W Z Q ~ _ • �z W Q Z� �w� ^1 • 0_D H W J w Q Q W W m ct L.L U W W W l!1 0 0 0- Q QD QZ9Z (0 0 Jw wDI I— D I— wD •1--' 1— QZ 0 —, - Lc) 03 v-) 0w 0 V 0 ro Cn r6 w 0 r6 V a) E ro 0 0 v a) 0 ro w -o ro O .� ro >� ro v cu s E au' ro L . c LA 0 s U CU .0 ro 0 .Ln E D N W •- o _6 Ln ro E ° v N • _ U -0 0 (1) ro • 0 - CD_ w ? tn 2 >.E ro vs CU O1 O CU Li) ro 0 >. a D C1) O ID V 0 a) L/1 ° cu > O s w W 0 0 - W . . • 4� a a) D o �1 �1 1 w D E O ro v) (75) -0 ce Ln ws 0 D 0 V) C (0 0 c -o CU s_ o CU i o 0 -0 CU vs i V V 0 D 0= v LL O V o_ cif _ _ -0 cn N 0 N c cu v) v +J o N rB 0 0 }, if, V1 N Q 0_ a) = 0 Q cnO u O �_ s_ 0 +-+ Q C aJ U 0 i N c ll1 fp c E ° }' +(0 N N ra c 0 v, 0 Q rau ra0 QD V �1 X i E m0_ w� v� Z C C >}, _ v =}, O ro •— cu u N D ro ad 01 < -0 C 0) o> -=0 -o v 0 (0 m O� ro� o =o V 41.1 c 4--, N N w co ) N +1 Z vl L V 0 - Q ate -+ ° U •- ro _c o f r6 i o1 Q L Vl �W cu ,4_ Q= I-0- N O W >` , -0 o CU o > v w0 a) c 0-c 0- ( v a= U y_ 0 .0 I I- U }' dJ cl O-0 Z o I Z c w> >� }' I ct -o Z a) O .0 v�_i N ~cu -,a) O-0 ~ra wv D Z o Lnz L a= Q1) 0- '' �n w> Z ,, Q o 0 c Z� N uw� �� ~- O� v`0 -j 0_ ct 4- 0) < v > v Z D J O,_ u w1- w(1) co r Oa, Oo c 0_ v c0_ _2 mu uc mu u ai Q ra _c fl W +_, w V_ > Ce w u_ 0 I- v) 0 V z 0 0 w a) v) v) Q DO v) v) w Ln Q a� ,r w Ce V a) z • _ w � Z w v, Q � c w + -) H w Ce Ln > V a) z C J > X a) Ce BAD DEBT EFFORTS USE OF RESERVES NEW REVENUE SOURCES Each of these strat C E w 0_ E u X • 4 E ro -0 V) E o Q o D 2 O -0 a) V +, ra V a) o a;s ++ > O U +, a1 a) C +_, 0 o 0_ a) ro -0 O I— r6 O ro r ai 92 V C a) J C 0 X i r0 _C--) IL rn r0 (1 a) O cn t)_ O V V Q r0 Ce X 1 r0 a) > V a) t w a) r .O . X o O a.) s_ _c o_ -) o_ -0 r0 :I-- ) V ow +-) 1- D cu 01 D - a) a) r0 > cu r6 q- a) O • > O O 0- E -a r6 D a.) o E ro (I) +-) r0 (1) year on properties in both years. . — p i v -I-; s +; ' - i— —0 0- -0 D Q, p D o E a.) o 0- k o co _c • – E o +; a) . E cn ra 4_, 11) 7) Tt C(1) 6- L — L co - tp, o k- ' • • 0- E E •-I-; rps- E cu 0 +-; 0 c o D '.L.)) cn CU X X V to U -0 00 a) (1) a) p O — � cn >, X a� O •— rci ra LUX >. L (/) a) c -C V1 E -I-; — ra s o ro sil-) -E5 ra CU O s X ra I..L E u O � � a) > -o -12.– c ro'— 2 ra CU CU O (1) O O sa) C —C U —0 U 0 E 19 - () IJ CU -0 v u p k I— l.7 . _0 ra Q < u 0 i D u a) - - c a c a) (1.3 `� E a) VI u 0 u O a (1•3 O — Q — Q V u - a) C r1.3 a > a -0 a C }' a) u > (0 +�-+ C > • – C a) a) •� u 0 E E 0 Ol Ol O a) �_ +-+ Q i i �O D Ol u C -I-+ v1 rB rB _0 C C • _ C a) o V1 a ,„ 1__, _ v, E ` — 0 a) u j vi a) >. j O +�+ u a D C i CU +-�+ U a) Q Q Ol u i — 2' 0 a) E O O O a u> a) 2 0 a) N t. E }+ > u +-+ t O O vl vl N p +•+ D Ol • - O D • N Ln -0 C 0 • - 7, p a }+ a 0 O a) 0 W -I-+ > a) O (0 a) 0- a ) 0 2 E< E 2 a ° 0 c ct a- p O 1- rB u v1 c a) E a) 0) ro c ro a) cn 4— > 1_ 0 cn Ce 4- C s_ cn 0 O , V) O > c c Cep O Cep E rO ? a) o +J +J +J E C!1 O D c 0 ce o r6 O r6 ro • c a) >, ro c ,> C ln 01 CEECLE›-D 2 " 0 0- C D s_ a) a) c CU X O VO0-CeO r6OWU �1 C-1 1 4 O o > o a) o 4-1 • _ E L-r V LO O >� r1 4U 1 0_ ' > 4U 0 F L .c u • •— O > • - > k ro E r° cn (1) O C!� -a O u � w O O c c O O +1 L (0 O c +1 • - u E a) • • w0 O a) M - _O s_ ro N u 0 a) M LO E c > 0) § CL D 0 • v) _ Cr 0 > 4 r13 w o r6 c u a) _ Li) >, >, E a) co • >_ , ' > >> 0 _ � a� + j W 1-1 m 0_ ro au (f) m q- a) E 0 W • ra >, X w Q+.+ -0 O O CD_ 5 c O 1. r� - O = N O � � •� can s In V) V) � (D a In •> V a' u 0 -I-) C w a) CO N O•-0 P V v _'-a ro `^-0 •v a_ c - c c i. ro W a) 4--' rD 0 O ra r� V a_ D s I— V s au V cn ize cost savings and d -1 cash transactions of 327,184 L ro > a) N O N v, al a v) O 0 s 0) c LE . 0 ra a- O a) c +J O ra cn v O � . 47) ra +) `n O ro +-) O o i O -0 _ ra E E D O Z transactions N a_ O_ 00 4' ro o ra 0 - w Lo ai 0 s LE ra 0 0 ro c ra Cost of transaction varies from a (/) a) 0.) = t • L o N 0 > C O - rB N v 0 D oo v) o 0� v m 0 Q D W p � v) 00 C Q r0 r0 L.r)"' via, r N 0 ro C Q u L u v ? o O O Q 0 . c o r0 I C r0 01 -0 vv) ) > ._ 0.) C N o > v ° > E L Q Ln > 0 C C • 5 aJ aJ ' L aJ V O O 0- Ln a.) N E L O -0 r0 v 0 ` ra a, ro OE_ ra = QVQa.) a C o = a) 0.) +� " L '� Ol � � ra � 0 � � u (0 r1 N 0 CU 0 01k tan (0 c CU a) Ln ra _ -0 v v v�i.� ou a, (0 O> O •C N x x J r 0 aJ rn E a.) 0 O - 4 N n N 01 O a .o i� O< r H> O_ I— .t D idation of Payro 0 cn 0 V • 2 > O ro O tll V a) k r0 k O c O ro 0 c 0 V Eight Safety Coordinators city -wide c 0 a) 4_' a-; a) a) cn N C a1 au r0 E c L 0_ a) O -0 U v) O r6 . � -o 0 st (.0 O -o a) r0 r6 +-) O -0 c 0) •— cn V N -0 •V a) O C > .V H c11 U VI a. r'� 1 M L V W ro o 4--J (J) N a) tott U 1 c v) ro c En CD a--' > C to g- rn ' U occur on an as 2 +_) tn Li_ ( '> . +�-+ U rn . — -0 u) U �O a) s U u) � - U 1, a) S U +_) Q U 4- O Lr1 M H r-I O O) 0 0 0 0 01'(1/ c C C C C ra U 0 0 0 0 1- D u u u u O Q) > > > > u) -0 a--; cu cu cu a) m 0 (Savings- $59,305) (Savings- X8,750) (Savings- $65,000) LO O cn m > ro 111 vs w V 's 0= a-•+ (Jj 0 N N •0_ -0 0) ro c V O U V �1 ..P0_ 2 uo Lnc O O N s c w• 0= w c +-+ o .(AE c• c) m W 0 `" 0 c 2 0_ aw > 2 U c ii_2._ (A 0 U(1) U U c O TI 0 rl 0 rl 0 O O 1 1 (!) (!) 01 01 . \ . \ r0 r6 V / V V c m .- V +, ce s O r6 c , cu -, c Q rt t 0 a--� • s_ c D O O •� -2 u 2 U _0 J O ce 0 � � � L.) J r6 - r6 ro u Ce r0 > 0- 0 Ln CL cn Two Vacant Park Construction C ro V) . V) cn Q r6 C CL 0 r6 a) O cn +-) C C r6 r6 � a) •U c U U 0_ -0 I- U1 r6 .1 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 O O O o Lr1 0 Lfl Lfl 1 1 1 1 V) V) 01 01 01 01 c c c c / \ \ \ ^n W U cu O ra 01 V •- ., > c 0 • '- i C 'V) u E s raO 00° M • n s_ CD ra LL 01 L 0 — c C Q) L cn .- � ' � V .— 0- <ro (.-0 LL C to O ra . - 02 mV (nOLL 0 i 0 Ln .> CU 0_ Ln Li- O 0 CU 01 0 L N L v E O a--+ c O 0 Li— O c f (f) v) N L -i-+ 0 D L v) 01 k v) CU D v) .c 0 CU c 0 L Q i 0 .0 Q D 0 0 a-• c 0 v) L 0_ Z CS Q. vl ZS OJ ,N H Z O 5 ts u O E CU Q s_ Vra OJ L. O V -0 0) N cu 0 21 _ O .= v an) ra t c N L CU k ate--+ v) c 0 0 D ` a—, v L CU 0 vi Z 0 ts ,N J 1... • 'c) O k 'fl v v Ct c . = l!1 U '4 J i vi CS 'L cji O 0 u Li rt3 O4 V u (B U v) v) L 0 U `- c 0 v) rB O a-, c 0 u ` OCU O 2 Q" N ± `-- vn O > -0 O O L v `i_ C O u O CU c D O }, +I-+ Ou Q O N rB rB t L rB O c Q O 'L _0 c u C _C N r0 r0 (13 r0 a-+ 01 V Q -0 rB L C N (0 C r-I I-1 rB C a_' ce a--• `- O N L I c O N +, � u O >- u tr) '� +, ra o > N-0 O C i o C ra r� 0 v '_ 0_ v 01 } , (731 N C C CU a--• C- CU C 0 c O -0 rB N U1 }, (0 }' • of rB . r-j s- O c — -0 `, • O > V -o rB — C O ra - a) O nj o (.0 D O v O c Ou ra c-0 0_ '> o v i v 0 >. s_ O ID -0 a-, N Ln r0 �• u (1 '� '� � - _C C CU Ln O V X a< o V O v l7 Z 0 Ln OQ i 0 Ln 0_ Ln p 01 n N O O r1 X00 O O -t quip oo 1-n C +J of V I O > ra VI C '+.+ O cu.— (13 a••+ • > c O '� Li- 0 '+.+ Ora O.- .n N N c N C 0 2 el 4. 'C N CO N al lO D • - O •.+ V raj O 0 C Ol � �w ram vn0c N N i '> �; '}, >O c Ora C V•N N -0 �� 'ra O }, LL C . _ O vv� u .0 O� 0v `nom p i o c vi •° v C O7 E +w.+ ra Li- D C_O O-0 2 c -0 (1) O ut .a o-0 E � �E e012 c� o +-, v O v E rB (1) a-+ N N om cm� kO N N - VI +, 0ce +(DLL +(D E Ln i— c s i ce r 0 N Ul 01 N • - a)) • ' fa �4- L.^ va,QQQajC i '> ? cu Ln nvaOlOwv 0 , u L v�1 Lfl Li) ifiri L a) (0 L o Q V) c U >. C ow U ro F2 ro E s a.) 0 LA et Q -I-, c . ro 0_ :_, -0 o i L.9 0 c S roE. > (1) - ' o E o 0, a c a) +� o O ozu .> D C CL o L ro a) 01 E 0_ 2 a) a) (1.) ra s — a) ra (0 .� -0 0 0 au a) m (0 U 0_ 1_ LI) E 1_ ro F_) L.) cu a-▪ -, c 0 ( a L) Q) ra D to Z oc ._ -0 U Wastewater O O o M L6 gO N ncrease due to operations o O O cn a-J C a) E N L 0- N L a-J a) 0 a) D a) u) L.) c gO N gO ncrease FY2o11 Uti ro O I- N. t/'1 Z 0 w 0 21 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: 07/13110 AGENDA ITEM: AMENDING CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 39, PERSONNEL, ARTICLE III EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM, REVISING SECTION 39 -309 COVERAGE UNDER THE CITY'S GROUP HEALTH PLAN TO ESTABLISH THE CITY CONTRIBUTION FOR CITICARE PREMIUM COVERAGE; REVISING SECTION 39 -312 RETIREES PARTICIPATION IN THE CITY'S GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM AT GROUP RATES TO CLARIFY THAT GROUP RATES ARE BASED UPON THE RETIREE GROUP; REPEALING ALL OTHER ORDINANCES, AND RULES, OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES AND RULES, IN CONFLICT WITH THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE. ISSUE: Proposed Revisions to Chapter 39 of the City Of Corpus Christi's Code of Ordinances to Reflect Revisions to Language Revise language in Code of Ordinances, Chapter 39, Personnel to address changes regarding the contributions by the city, employees, members of City Council, and retirees for health plan coverage. See Background information Section for proposed revisions. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Requesting City Council approval of revisions to the City of Corpus Christi's Code of Ordinances, as amended, Chapter 39, Personnel, for administration of the Compensation & Classification Plan for FY 2010 -2011. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: None CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: proposed revisions to the Code of Ordinances, Attachments It is recommended that the City Council approve the Chapter 39, Personnel, for FY 2010 -2011. Cyril la C. Garcia Director of Human Resources cynthiag@cctexas.com 361- 826 -3306 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. Proposed Revisions To Chapter 39 of the City's Code of Ordinances: Article 111: Section 309 Coverage Under the City's Group Health Plan for Eligible Employees and Members of the City Council • Add language to establish City contribution for Citicare Premium employee only and dependent coverage equal to the City contribution for Citicare employee only and dependent coverage. Revised language regarding council member and dependent coverage to address the city contribution, same as for employees. These ordinance changes are necessary given the changes to the civilian health plan design, offering employees a choice of two plans; Citicare or Citicare Premium. Section 312 Retirees Participation In the City's Group Health insurance Program At Retiree Group Rates • Revise language to clarify that group rates are based upon the retiree group. • Delete language defining eligibility as "(3) at age sixty (60) upon completion of a minimum of five (5) years of continuous service with the city", as retirement eligibility is defined by item #1 "when eligible for retirement under requirements of the Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS)". o This change is to ensure compliance with Texas Government Code Chapter 175, and to clarify eligibility requirements for retiree participation in the group health insurance program. -206- Page 1. of 3 ORDINANCE AMENDING CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 39, PERSONNEL, ARTICLE Ill EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM, REVISING SECTION 39 -309 COVERAGE UNDER THE CITY'S GROUP HEALTH PLAN TO ESTABLISH THE CITY CONTRIBUTION FOR CITICARE PREMIUM COVERAGE; REVISING SECTION 39 -312 RETIREES PARTICIPATION IN THE CITY'S GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM AT GROUP RATES TO CLARIFY THAT GROUP RATES ARE BASED UPON THE RETIREE GROUP; REPEALING ALL OTHER ORDINANCES, AND RULES, OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES AND RULES, IN CONFLICT WITH THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Chapter 39, PERSONNEL, Article III. Employee Compensation and Classification System of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, Section 39 -309, is amended to read as follows: ARTICLE III. EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Sec. 39 -309. Coverage under the city's group health plan for eligible employees and members of the city council. (a) Full -time employees are eligible for group health plan coverage as defined by the city manager at the employee monthly cost of sixty -three dollars and thirty -six cents ($63.36) for Citicare, Cbeise- For full -time employees selecting Citicare Premium the employee cost will be the total premium cost minus a City contribution equal to the amount the City contributes for employees selecting Citicare. (1) Part -time employees routinely assigned to work twenty -five (25) or more base hours per seven -day work period who were employed by the city prior to August 1, 2008 and who were participating in the city's group health insurance plan as of July 31, 2008 are eligible for group health plan coverage as defined by the city manager, and shall contribute fifty (50) per -scent percent of the city's cost for employee only coverage, if such coverage is elected. (2) If a part -time employee covered by provision (a)(1) above drops coverage, the employee will no longer be eligible for such coverage. (3) Part -time employees, other than as provided in (a)(1) above, are not eligible for group health plan coverage. Page2of3 (b) Full -time employees shall contribute fifty (50) per -sent percent of the cost for dependent group health plan coverage for Citicare, if such coverage is elected. For full -time employees selecting Citicare Premium the employee cost will be the total remium cost minus a Ci contribution a ual to the amount the Ci contributes for employees selecting Citicare. (1) Part -time employees, eligible to participate in the group health plan as provided in (a)(1) above, shall contribute seventy -five (75) percent percent of the cost of dependent group health plan coverage, if such coverage is elected. (c) Members of the city council and their dependents are eligible for the city's group health plan coverage, and shall contribute at the same rate as full -time employees for the cost of such coverage. SECTION 2. Chapter 39, PERSONNEL, Article ID. Employee Compensation and Classification System of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, Section 39 -312, is amended to read as follows: Sec. 39 -312. Retirees participation in the city's group health insurance program at retiree group rates. City employees will be eligible to participate as retirees in the city's group health insurance program at retiree group rates when any of the following conditions exist: (1) when eligible for retirement under requirements of the Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS); or (2) due to disability retirement; . An employee who terminates employment and does not meet these conditions will be eligible for group health insurance program coverage under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA), provided that the employee meets the eligibility and other COBRA requirements under this federal law. SECTION 3. This Ordinance is effective upon final adoption by the City Council. Revisions within this Ordinance will become effective August 2, 2010. SECTION 4. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance be given full force and effect for its purpose. Page 3 of 3 That the fore ing ordinance wa rea for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2010, by the following vote: ../I Priscilla Leal Na Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry R. Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame Priscilla Leal Chris N. Adler John E. Marez Brent Chesney Nelda Martinez Larry R. Elizondo, Sr. Mark Scott Kevin Kieschnick PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2010. ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary Joe Adame Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM \f L.(-4' % , 2010 Jennifer A. Knox- Walker Assistant City Attorney for City Attorney 22 SECOND READING CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: July 13, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: In support of the FY 2010 -11 Proposed Budget which includes fee and rates increases and new proposed fees and rates. A. FIRST READING ORDINANCE- AMENDING SECTIONS 55-50, 55 -52, 55 -113 AND 55 -70(9) AND ADDING NEW SECTION 55 -55, 55-56, AND 55 -115, CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, REGARDING WATER RATES; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. B. FIRST READING ORDINANCE ARTICLE III, CHPATER 12, CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, REGARDING THE SUNRISE BEACH RECREATION SITE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. C. FIRST READING ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 55 -61 AND 55-63, CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, REGARDING GAS RATES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. D. FIRST READING ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 35- 147(D), CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, REGARDING PIPELINE REPORTING FEES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. E. FIRST READING ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 55-100, 55 -102, AND 55 -148, CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, REGARDING WASTEWATER RATES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. F. FIRST READING ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 18- 1(B)(12), CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, REGARDING FIRE CODE FEES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE, AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. G. FIRST READING ORDNANCE CREATING NEW SECTION 19 -105, CHAPTER 19, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, REGARDING REINSPECTION OF SOFT SERVE ICE CREAM MACHINES AND RELATED FEE; AMENDING THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 23, CODE OF ORDINANCES: SECTION 23 -18, ENTITLED "SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR CLINICAL HEALTH SERVICES AND POLICIES RELATED TO THE IMPOSITION AND COLLECTION OF SUCH FEES," TO REVISE EXISTING FEES AND APPLICABLE PROVISIONS; AND SECTION 23 -19, ENTITLED "FEE FOR LABORATORY TESTING OF WATER SAMPLES, TO REVISE THE TITLE AND ESTABLISH NEW FEES FOR VECTOR SERVICES; CREATING NEW SECTION 23 -24, —213— THE AUDITORIUM AND RELATED EQUIPMENT; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE, AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. H. FIRST READING ORDINANCE AMENDING VARIOUS PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 21 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, ENTITLES "GARBAGE, TRASH AND OTHER REFUSE" TO REVISE EXISTING FEES, ADD NEW DEFINITIONS AND LANGUAGE, AND ESTABLISH NEW FEES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. I. FIRST READING ORDINANCE AMENDING CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 17, TO ESTABLISH FEES FOR PUBLIC INFORMATIN OFFICE: $25 CCTV COMMUNITY EVENT BULLETIN BOARD SLIDE FEE, AND $75 /HOUR FEE FOR VIDEO PRODUCTION SERVICES, AND INCLUDE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AUDIO VIDEO SERVICES AFTER BUSINESS HOURS FEE OF $50 /HOUR; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE, AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. J. FIRST READING ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 2 REGARDING $5.00 LOST LIBRARY ITEM PROCESSING FEE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. K. FIRST READING ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 3 Y2 -2, CODE OF ORDINANCES, RELATING TO THE FEES CHARGES FOR ALARM SYSTEMS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. L. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ADJUSTMENT OF PARKS, RECREATION, CULTURAL, AND LEISURE TIME ACTIVITIES RENTAL AND RECREATIONAL FEES; ADDING NEW RENTAL AND RECREATIONAL FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE, AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. ISSUE: The Proposed FY 2010 -11 Budget includes estimated revenues generated from increased fees /rates and new fees /rates necessary to fund specific projects and/or cover existing operating costs. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: July 6, 2010 — Proposed Budget Public Hearing RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the ordinances as presented. 4ivat4; Eddie Houlihan Assistant Director of Management and Budget 361/826 -3792 EddieHoAcctexas.com —214— Page 1 of 16 ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 55 -50, 55-52, 55 -113, AND 55-70(9) AND ADDING NEW SECTION 55 -55, 55 -56, AND 55 -115, CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, REGARDING WATER RATES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT; SECTION 1. Section 55 -50, Code of Ordinances, is revised to read as follows: "Sec. 55 -50. Schedule. "(a) Base rates for water service. The rates for water service are as follows: "(1) Monthly minimum charges. "a. Metered treated water customers. "1. Inside city limits (" !CL" 1: Residential Meter Size (Inches) August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011 5/8-- 3/4 Commercial 5/8-- 3/4 $ 8.72 Residential and Commercial 1 12.33 12.58 1 1/2 2 3 4 2010-2011 WATER RATE ORDINANCE 07082010B —215— -1-8-50 18.87 30.81 31,46 61.67 62.90 48,67 100.64 197.31 201.29 6 Page 2 of 16 8 and larger Large Volume Any size 314.52 616.70 629.03 Temporary construction 1 16,02 &00 16 349.00 1% 2 "2. Outside city limits ( "OCL "): 18.87 31.46 62.90 Residential Meter Size (Inches) August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011 518 - -3/ Commercial 5/8 -- 3/4 Residential and Commercial 1 1% 2 3 4 6 $--1-04€ $ 10.46 15.10 22.20 22.64 31- 37.75 X4-90 75.48 2010 -2011 WATER RATE ORDINANCE 070820108 —216— 118.10 1 20.77 236.81 241.55 370.02 377.42 8 and larger Large Volume Page 3 of 16 740.04 754.84 Any size Temporary construction 1 1% 2 b. Untreated water customers. Minimum monthly service charge, water districts /municipalities with raw water supply contracts executed after January 1, 1997 Minimum monthly service charge for public agency for resale untreated water without a raw water supply contract executed after January 1, 1 9971 Minimum monthly service charge, industrial Minimum monthly service charge, domestic 26,74 1.00 27 279.00 22.64 37.75 75.48 August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011 $- 382631 $ 390.281 233.010 237.70 Minimum annual service charge, domestic Minimum monthly service charge, agricultural irrigation water service Minimum monthly service charge, temporary construction water service 1 382.631 390.28 12,744 13.00 127.540 1 30.09 195.00 260.00 Minimum monthly charge for public agency for resale untreated water customer without a raw water supply contract executed after January 1, 1997: If the charge based on the volume of water taken in a monthly billing period is less than $233.040, the customer shall be billed $233.040, unless a valid water supply contract between the customer and city that was executed prior to January 1, 1997, provides for a minimum annual payment. If a valid water supply contract between the customer and city executed prior 2010 -2011 WATER RATE ORDINANCE 07082010B —217— Page 4 of 16 to August 1, 2000, provides for a minimum annual payment, the customer shall pay the minimum annual payment under the contract. "c. Blended water customers. Any size. August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011 "(2) Monthly volume charges per 1,000 gallons. "a. Residential rate. "1. Inside city limits: $ 27,279.00 First 2,000 Gallons August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011 Next 4,000 Gallons Next 4,000 Gallons Minimum* Next 5,000 Gallons Next 15,000 Gallons Next 20,000 Gallons Next 50,000 Gallons Over 100,000 Gallons $ 3.442 3.623 4.302 *Use the minimum charges in subsection (a)(1). "2. Outside city limits: 4 4.948 5.072 6.023 6,1-59 7.314 6:703 7.960 7,246 8.605 First 2,000 Gallons August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011 Next 4,000 Gallons Minimum* 2010-2011 WATER RATE ORDINANCE 070820105 —218— $4,564 $ 1.613 Next 4,000 Gallons Next 5,000 Gallons Next 15,000 Gallons Next 20,000 Gallons Next 50,000 Gallons Over 100,000 Gallons *Use the minimum charges in subsection (a}(1). "b. Commercial rate. "1. Inside city limits: First 2,000 Gallons Over 2,000 Gallons *Use the minimum charges in subsection (a }(1). "2. Outside city limits: First 2,000 Gallons Over 2,000 Gallons *Use the minimum charges in subsection (a)(1). "c. Roserved- Golf course and athletic field irrigation water inside City limits: Page 5 of 16 1.055 2.016 2 4v 2.319 2.737 2.823 3.324 3.428 3:644 3.730 37949 4.032 , August 9, 2090 to July 31, 20'14 Minimum* $ -3.623 $ 4.302 :::::=1114t4:-.1;u41/(1:1-241441: 2011 Minimum* $- 1-.955 $ 2.383 First 2,000 Gallons Over 2,000 Gallons 2010 -2011 WATER RATE ORDINANCE 07082010B -219- August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011 Minimum* $ 2.246 Page 6 of 16 *Use the minimum charges in subsection (a)(1) for ICL commercial customer. "d. Resale treated water rates. "1. Treated water rates purchased for resale where the water is taken and metered at the site of treatment are hereby set as follows: *Use the minimum charges in subsection (a)(1). "2. Treated water rates purchased for resale where the water is delivered to the resale entity through city facilities are hereby set as follows: August 4 2009 to my 31 7040 Auqust1, 2010 to July 31, 2011 First 2,000 Gallons Minimum* Over 2,000 Gallons $-948 $ .824 *Use the minimum charges in subsection (a)(1). "2. Treated water rates purchased for resale where the water is delivered to the resale entity through city facilities are hereby set as follows: *Use the minimum charges in subsection (a)(1). "e. Large volume treated water customers. A commercial treated water customer who agrees to pay for a minimum of ten million (10,000,000) gallons of treated water per month is considered a large volume treated water customer. Once a customer has elected to become a large volume treated water customer, the customer will be billed as a large volume treated water customer until the customer notifies the city and requests reclassification as a commercial customer in writing. However, a commercial customer may not elect to become a large volume treated water customer more than once in any twelve -month period. "1. Inside city limits: August 4 2000 to my 31 20-10 August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011 First 2,000 Gallons Minimum* Over 2,000 Gallons $1 /135 $ 1.465 *Use the minimum charges in subsection (a)(1). "e. Large volume treated water customers. A commercial treated water customer who agrees to pay for a minimum of ten million (10,000,000) gallons of treated water per month is considered a large volume treated water customer. Once a customer has elected to become a large volume treated water customer, the customer will be billed as a large volume treated water customer until the customer notifies the city and requests reclassification as a commercial customer in writing. However, a commercial customer may not elect to become a large volume treated water customer more than once in any twelve -month period. "1. Inside city limits: 2010 -2011 WATER RATE ORDINANCE 07082010B —220— August > > August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011 First 10,000,000 Gallons Minimum* Each Additional 1,000 Gallons $4.940 $ 2.547 2010 -2011 WATER RATE ORDINANCE 07082010B —220— Page 7 of 16 *Use the minimum charges in subsection (a)(1). "2. Outside city limits: First 10,000,000 Gallons r �st 00 . 3 4 2011.0 August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011 Each Additional 1,000 Gallons Minimum* *Use the minimum charges in subsection (a)(1). "f. Large volume blended water customers. A commercial blended water customer who agrees to purchase a minimum of ten million (10,000,0001 gallons of blended water per month is considered a large volume blended water customer. $- 1.485 $ 1.465 "1. Inside city limits: First 10,000,000 Gallons August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011 Each Additional 1,000 Gallons *Use the minimum charges in subsection (a)(1). "2. Outside city limits: Minimum* $ 2.278 First 10,000,000 Gallons August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011 Each Additional 1,000 Gallons *Use the minimum charges in subsection (a)(1). "3. Peaking factor. [To be determined.j "g. Temporary water service, "1. Treated water. "A. Inside city limits: Minimum* $ 0.071 First 2,000 Gallons August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011 Over 2,000 Gallons *Use the minimum charges in subsection (a)(1). 2010 -2011 WATER RATE ORDINANCE 070820108 —221— Minimum* $ 4.500 Page 8 of 16 "B. Outside city limits: First 2,000 Gallons August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011 Over 2,000 Gallons *Use the minimum charges in subsection (a)(1), "2. Untreated water, "A. inside city limits: Minimum* $ 2.600 First 2,000 Gallons August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011 Over 2,000 Gallons *Use the minimum charges in subsection (a)(1). Minimum* 2XRWCA "B. Outside ciy limits: First 2,000 Gallons August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011 Over 2,000 Gallons *Use the minimum charges in subsection (a )[1). "h. Agricultural irrigation water outside City limits: August1, 2010 to July 31, 2011 First 2,000 Gallons Minimum* 2XRWCA Over 2,000 Gallons *Use the minimum charges in subsection (a)(1). "iLPublic agency for resale untreated water rates. The rates for the purchase of untreated water purchased by a public agency, which does not have a raw water supply contract with the city executed after January 1, 1997, is the average of the monthly raw water cost adjustments, established under subsection (b) of this section, for the period used to determine the composite cost of untreated water under the city's current contract with the public agency. "(b) Raw water cost adjustment (RWCA). in addition to the charges for the base rates for water service, established in subsection (a), a separate charge for the costs of raw water, the RWCA, will be added to each consumer's bill, except public agency for resale untreated water customers without a raw water supply contract executed after Minimum* 2 X RWCA 2010 -2011 WATER RATE ORDINANCE 070820108 —222— Page 9 of 18 January 1, 1997. (A public agency for resale untreated water customer without a raw water supply contract executed after January 1, 1997, will pay the lower of the composite cost, as defined in its contract with the city or the rate for public agency for resale untreated water customers without a raw water supply contract executed after January 1, 1997, specified in subsection (a)(2)f. of this section.) The RWCA will be based on projected system -wide raw water sales, adjusted for water losses. The RWCA will be calculated on an annual basis using the adopted utility rate model according to the following procedures: "(1) Use projected system -wide water sales based on historical consumption and projected growth, with adjustments for water losses. "(2) Include the annual budgeted cost of debt service. Bond payments, amortization of deferred losses on refundings, and other debt service costs shall be applied to the RWCA in the same proportion as the raw water activities proportion of the original bond proceeds, "(3) Include budgeted expenditures for purchases of water. "(4) Include purchases of water rights, amortized over the duration of the water right agreement. "(5) Budgeted expenditures for capital items shall be included as follows: "a. The expense of acquiring a capital item that costs not more than ere five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) shall be charged in the year in which it is acquired. "b. The expense of acquiring a capital item that costs more than efive hundred thousand dollars 500 000.00 shall be amortized over the number of years used to calculate depreciation expenses, with the half -year convention used in the year of acquisition. "(6) All operating and maintenance expenditures shall be charged based on annual budgeted amounts. These expenditures include operation and maintenance of dams, reservoirs, pipelines, wells, pumping stations, and related interfund charges. "(7) All expenses for consultants, engineering, legal services, and administration shall be charged based on annual budgeted amounts in the proportion to which they apply to raw water issues. "(8) Expenses related to the acquisition and transportation of emergency water supplies shall be included in the RWCA for the following fiscal year, unless foreseen and budgeted in advance, in which case they are included in the year budgeted. 2010 -2011 WATER RATE ORDINANCE 070820108 —223— Page 10 of 16 "(9) Miscellaneous revenues related to raw water activity, such as oil and gas lease revenues and rental '- _ _ applied as an offset based on annual budgeted amounts. , is "(10) Apply the credit for levelized Choke Canyon debt payments to city rate payers' : _'__ -: _ : -_ -••_ ' -• -- - -• RWCA. - (The escalating payment schedule on the Choke Canyon debt was levelized through the creation of a reserve fund. In the initial years, payments greater than the debt service were made, with the excess going into the reserve fund. This excess was paid through a rate surcharge on ICL and OCL. metered treated water customers. Now that bond payments exceed the levelized payment amount, the reserve fund is drawn on to make up the difference. Since only ICL and OCL metered treated water customers participated in building the reserve fund, the drawing on the reserve fund is only credited to the RWCA assessed against ICL and OCL metered treated water customers.) "(11) Include funds necessary to collect 1.35 times coverage on current annual debt service in order to improve the financial position and bond ratings of the city's water fund. "(12) Include funds necessary to establish and maintain an operating reserve fund with a target amount of twenty -five (25) per cent (or three (3) months) of annual operating expenses for the fiscal year. "(13) Include funds necessary to establish and operate a water capital reserve fund with a target amount of two (2) per cent of the respective annual water capital improvements program for the fiscal year or two million dollars ($2,000,000.00) (whichever is greater). "(14) Include funds necessary to establish and maintain a future water resources reserve fund with an ultimate target balance of $30,000,000, and an annual contribution of approximately $2,000,000 per fiscal year. ",(15) The minimum operating or capital reserves amounts are intended to provide for unplanned, unbudgeted expenses and revenue shortfalls, and will not be used for routine expenses. "45)-(16) At fiscal year end, determine the amount of over or under collections that have resulted from difference between budgeted and actual expenses and offsetting revenues and the difference between projected and actual volume of water sold. Any funds realized in excess of annual expenses are available for either supplementing minimum operating or capital reserves, for addition to the capital funds for discretionary cash capital funding of the water utility, or to create and maintain a reserve to level out large fluctuations in raw water charges is authorized. Apply any remaining amount as an adjustment to the yearls-RWCA. 2010 -2011 WATER RATE ORDINANCE 07082010B —224— Page 11 of 16 "(c) Definitions. "Costs of raw water is the total of all costs of acquiring, producing, storing, conserving, and transporting untreated water from its source to the City's treatment facility and all other points of diversion. These costs include, but are not limited to the costs of: "Construction, including debt service, operation, and maintenance of dams and reservoirs. "Construction, including debt service, operation, and maintenance of raw water supply transmission pipelines. "Construction, including debt service, operation, and maintenance of wells. "Construction, including debt service, operation, and maintenance of facilities capable of converting wastewater effluent, salt water, and brackish ground water into water suitable for municipal, industrial, or agricultural uses. "Acquisition of new water supplies and water rights, including the establishment and funding of a reserve dedicated to offset the costs of acquisition of additional water rights and the implementation of long range water resource development and related capital improvements. Payments to the P.L. 104 -318 Alternative Water Supply Acquisition and Facilities Construction Special Fund. "Construction, operation, and maintenance of facilities to reduce water losses from water resources due to evaporation or the release of water from a reservoir due to the operation of law. "Acquisition and transportation of emergency water supplies, including the costs of transporting water by vessel or pipelines from other regions. 'Water supply development and protection, including consultants' studies and reports, investigations, legal fees, court costs, and any other costs related to the development or protection of the water supply. "Administrative costs, including overhead and the portion of the city's general administrative costs applicable to the activities enumerated in this definition. 2010 -2011 WATER RATE ORDINANCE 07082010B —225— Page 12 of 16 SECTION 2, Section 55 -52, Code of Ordinances, is revised to read as follows: "Sec. 55 -52. Contracts for sale of irrigation water. "The director of public utilities is authorized to execute contracts for the sale of irrigation water for periods not to exceed five (5) years, according to the form of contract attached to Ordinance No. 10806, on file in the city secretary's office, any modifications of standard contract to be approved by the city manager. The contracts must be based on the water rates in Section 55 -50." SECTION 3. Article I11 of Chapter 55, Code of Ordinances, is amended by adding new Sections 55 -55 and 55 -56 to read as follows: ARTICLE III. WATER RATES AND CHARGES * "Secs. 55 -55. Large volume customer equity buy -in fee. "(a) Any large volume treated or blended water customer who requests more than 120,000,000 gallons of water on an annual basis shall pay an equity buy -in fee, "(b) The equity buy -in fee will be calculated using the following procedures: ITo be developed.1 "(c) All equity buy -in fees shall be deposited in the future water supply reserve fund for the dedicated to offset the costs of acquisition of additional water rights and the implementation of long range water resource development and related capital improvements. "Sec. 55 -56. Temporar _construction water service. "(a) The City Manager or designee may authorize the use of fire hydrants or other connections to the City's water distribution system or water supply system for temporary water service, including, but not limited to, for construction and exploration and development of natural resources, such as oil or natural gas. "(b) Temporary water service customers shall post a $600.00 deposit to cover the costs that the City will incur for a replacement meter. If the meter is returned to the City, the customer will receive a $590.00 refund on the deposit, and be charged a $10.00 set fee. "(c) The temporary water service customer shall pay an application fee to cover the costs of establishing the temporary account, placing the meter, and installing any required backflow preventer. The temporary water service application fees are: "(1) Inside city limits -- $100.00. "(2) Outside city limits -- $100.00. 2010 -2011 WATER RATE ORDNANCE 07082010B —226— Page 13 of 16 "id "ial The tern ora water service customer shat! a the a licable water service rates in Section 55 -50, "(e) If the customer request relocation of the temporary meter, the customer shall pav a $75.00 meter movement fee. " f If a customer moves a tern ora water service meter the customer shall a a $125.00 meter tampering charge, plus the costs of any broken parts, including chains, locks, and seals. "Secs. 55- 57-- 55 -59. Reserved." SECTION 4. Article Vlll of Chapter 55, Code of Ordinances is amended by revising Section 55 -113 and adding a new section 55 -115 to read as follows: "ARTICLE Vill. WATER SERVICE OUTSIDE CITY "Sec. 55 -113. City council approval. "fay Each contract for water service outside the city limits which includes a new water connection must receive approval by the city council before the contract for such service can become effective. "Q2) The city manager or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute water service contracts meeting all of the requirements contained herein-in this article when no additional service connection is involved or the contract is for temporary water service for a period of not more than one year or for consumption of less than 10 acre feet of water during the entire contract term. "Secs. 55 -115. Temporary water service. "(a) The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute a temporary water service contract for treated or untreated water to customers within the City's certificate of convenience and necessity service area that are outside the city limits or along the portions of the Nueces River system that are subject to the City's water rights. The temporary water service contract must follow the form of contract attached to Ordinance No. (insert number of this ordinance], on file in the city secretary's office, any modifications of standard contract to be approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. "(b) Temporary water service customers must post a deposit to cover the costs that the City will incur for a replacement meter. The temporary water service customer must pay the applicable water service rates and application fee in Sections 55 -50 and 55 -56. 2010 -2011 WATER RATE ORDINANCE 070820108 —227— Page 14 of 16 "Secs. 55-116-55-119. Reserved." SECTION 5. Section 55- 70(9), Code of Ordinances is revised to read as follows: "Sec. 55 -70. Adoption of rules, regulations and water and gas fees. "The rules and regulations concerning the control, operation and administration of utility taps or service connections of water, gas and sewer utilities owned by the city and the regulations prescribing fees for utility taps or service connections are hereby adopted and approved as follows: "(9) Fee schedule, water: "(a) Inside city limits: Size 5/8 inch x 3/4 inch 3/4 inch 1 inch Over 1 inch Loops *, minimum Street Fee Easement Fee $ 520.73 $ 561.00 5343 576.00 679.11 734.00 Special* $ 132.73 $ 469.00 416.73 484.00 591.14 641.00 Special* Meter moves *, minimum 212.00 236.00 58.00 24 236.00 58.00 *Denotes costs to be specified by the director of water utilities based on circumstances. "(b) Fees inside the city limits in subdivision in which the developer has installed the service lines when the subdivision was constructed. 5/8 inch x 3/4 inch 3/4 inch 1 inch Size Fee 2010 -2011 WATER RATE ORDINANCE 07082010B —228— $460,65 $ 169.00 174.65 183.00 2-4-7,a0 228.00 "(c) Outside city limits: Size 5/8 inch x 3/4 inch 3/4 inch 1 inch Street Fee Page 15 of 16 Easement Fee Over 1 inch Special* Loops *, minimum $ -7-2273 $ 763.00 7-4043 782.00 968.1 -4 1023.00 Special* $46-1,73 $ 598.00 576.73 614.00 769.11 819.00 Special* Meter moves *, minimum 362430 354.00 86.00 354.00 86.00 *Denotes cost to be specified by the director of water utilities based on circumstances. "(d) Fees outside the city limits in subdivision in which the developer has installed the service lines when the subdivision was constructed. 5/8 inch x 3/4 inch 3/4 inch 1 inch Size Fee * * * * * $-845 $ 169.00 171.65 183.00 217.30 228.00 SECTION 6. if for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance be given full force and effect for its purpose. SECTION 7. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. 2010 -2011 WATER RATE ORDINANCE 07082010B —229— Page 16 of 16 That the foregoing ordjn a was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the 1.�day of c_ , 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry R. Elizondo, S Kevin Kieschriick Priscilla Leal L 0 John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame Priscilla Leal Chris N. Adler John E. Marez Brent Chesney Nelda Martinez Larry R. Elizondo, Sr. Mark Scott Kevin Kieschnick PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of 2010. ATTEST: Armando Chapa Joe Adame City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: 8TH day of July, 2010: R. Jay Firs • ss'.. taut Ci , ttomey For City Attorn 2010 -2011 WATER RATE ORDINANCE 07082010B —230— Page 1 of 4 ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE III, CHAPTER 12, CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, REGARDING THE SUNRISE BEACH RECREATION SITE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. Article 111 of Chapter 12, Code of Ordinances, is amended by adding a new Section 12 -108, to read as follows: Chapter 12 BOATS, BAYS AND WATERWAYS Article III. Miscellaneous Regulations on Lake Corpus Christi and Other Bodies of Water Discharging Into Nueces River Sec. 12 -108. Sunrise Beach Recreation Site. fa) The Director of Water Operations, or designee, is authorized to prepare and sign standard user or rental agreements for the rental of camp sites, recreational vehicle parking spaces, and other facilities and equipment at the City's Sunrise Beach Recreation Site on Lake Corpus Christi. All rental agreements must be signed by the Director or the Director's designee under the following conditions: (1) The form of every rental agreement must be approved by the City Attorney, or designee, but the City Attorney, or designee, is not required to sign the approval on each document executed under this section. (2) All blanks must be filled in and the information required by the standard form document must be provided. (3) Verbal arrangements to rent are not recognized under any circumstances. (4) This section, the standard form documents for the rental agreements, and rules for the operation of the Sunrise Beach Recreation Site constitute the whole agreement between the parties and may not be altered unless done so in writing, signed by authorized representative of both parties, and approved by the City Attorney, or designee. (5) All rental agreements must provide that parties contracting for the use of City's facilities or other property hold the city harmless from any and all liability for any claim or claims as a result of use of the premises, equipment, or other 2010-2011 SUNRISE BEACH FEE ORDINANCE 07082010 —231— Page 2 of 4 property and must indemnify the city in case of any claims resulting from their operations, use, or occurring as a result of their occupancy of the premises or use of property and all agreements shall specifically include such provisions. (6) Rental agreements may not be assigned without the prior written authorization of the Director. b The Director of Water D erations shall a i an de osit a ainst an amounts owed to the City of Corpus Christi for use of the roe or facilities and the Director may refuse to enter into an rental a reement until an and all amounts due the Ci b an a licant or or anization orb an or anization which the a licant has re resented have been paid in full. (c) The Director, or designee, may enter rented facilities for the purpose of ensuring that arties comply with the provisions of this section the rules or the applicable rental agreement. (d) The Director shall publish rules governing the operation of the City's Sunrise Beach Recreation Site, which may include, but are not limited to, the length of stay; deposits required; late fees, service charges, and application fees; maintenance and repair of camp sites, recreational vehicle parking spaces, and other facilities and equipment; disposal of solid waste; use of City provided utility services; use of City provided common facilities; hours of operation of facilities; and standards of conduct. The rules must be approved by the City Attorney, or designee. (e) The Director shall charge the following applicable fees for use of the facilities at the Sunrise Beach Recreation Site: FACILITY FEE Daily Use Automobile (1 or two passengers) $8.00 Additional passengers 3.00 Children (6 and under) Free Use of Boat Ramp ? ? ?.00 Overnight Primitive Tent Camping (no electricity or water) Automobile or RV (1 or two occupants) $25.00 Additional occupants 3.00 Children (6 and under) Free 2010 -2011 SUNRISE BEACH FEE ORDINANCE 07082010 —232— Page 3 of 4 Overnight Camping (electricity and water provided) RV (1 or two occupants) $30.00 Additional occupants 3.00 Free Children (0 and under) Overnight Camping (full hook -up — electricity, water, and sewer provided) RV (1 or two occupants) $35.04 Additional occupants 3.00 Children (6 and underl Free Extended Stay RV sites (full hook -up -- electricity, water, and sewer) Weekly site 150.00 Monthly site 400.00 Extended Stay Stationary Mobile Home or RV sites (partial hook- 400.00 up — water and sewer / electricity individually metered SECTION 2. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance be given full force and effect for its purpose. SECTION 3. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. 2010 -2011 SUNRISE BEACH FEE ORDINANCE 07082010 —233— Page 4 of 4 That the foregoing ordJ'na pe was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the 1 day of L. 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry R. Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame Priscilla Leal Chris N. Adler John E. Marez Brent Chesney Nelda Martinez Larry R. Elizondo, Sr. Mark Scott Kevin Kieschnick PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2010. ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED: 8TH day of July, 2010: R.J. `-ining Fi st ssistant City Attorney For City Attorney Joe Adame Mayor 2010 -2011 SUNRISE BEACH FEE ORDINANCE 07082010 —234— Page 1 of 8 ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 55-61 AND 55 -63, CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, REGARDING GAS RATES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. Section 55 -61, Code of Ordinances is revised to read as follows: "Sec. 55 -61. Classification of customers and schedules of rates. "(a) Residential customers. "(1) Inside city limits: "a. Winter rates (from November Cycle 11 through April Cycle 10). Rate per MCF Monthly Consumption Meter Charge First 1 MCF (minimum bill) Next 2 MCF Next 3 MCF Next 4 MCF Next 20 MCF Next 20 MCF August 1, 2010 --Juiv 31, 2011 $ 1.00 9.47 5.30 3.06 2.98 2.89 All over 50 MCF 2.47 2.05 Note: Rates do not include purchased gas adjustment and sales tax, where applicable. "b. Summer rates (from April Cycle 11 through November Cycle 10). Rate per MCF Monthly Consumption Meter Charge First 1 MCF (Minimum Bill) Next 2 MCF August 1, 2010 --July 31, 2011 $ 1.00 9.47 5.30 2010-2011 GAS RATE ORDINANCE 07082010A —235— Next 3 MCF Next 4 MCF Next 20 MCF Next 20 MCF Page 2 of 8 Ail over 50 MCF 3.06 2.30 1.54 1.50 1.37 "Note: Rates do not include purchased gas adjustment and safes tax, where applicable, "(2) Outside city limits: "a. Winter rates (from November Cycle 11 through April Cycle 10). Monthly Consumption Meter Charge Rate per MCF August-11-2009-4111Y4-1T20-1-0 August 1, 2010 —July 31, 2011 First 1 MCF (minimum bill) Next 2 MCF Next 3 MCF Next 4 MCF $ 1.25 11.68 5.94 3.43 Next 20 MCF Next 20 MCF 3.34 3.24 All over 50 MCF 2.77 2.30 Note: Rates do not include purchased gas adjustment and sales tax, where applicable. "b. Summer rates (from April Cycle 11 through November Cycle 10). Monthly Consumption Meter Charge Rate per MCF August 1, 2010 -July 31, 2011 First 1 MCF (minimum bill) Next 2 MCF Next 3 MCF Next 4 MCF $ 1.25 11.68 5.94 3.43 Next 20 MCF Next 20 MCF 2.58 1.72 1.68 2010 -2011 GAS RATE ORDINANCE 07082010A —236— Page 3 of 8 All over 50 MCF 1.53 Note: Rates do not include purchased gas adjustment and sales tax, where applicable. "(b) General rate customers (commercial, industrial, and institutional rates): "(1) Inside city limits: Note: Rates do not include purchased gas adjustment and sales tax, where applicable. "(2) Outside city limits: Rate per MCF Monthly Consumption F , August 1, 2010 --July 31, 2011 Meter Charge $ 12.02 First 1 MCF (minimum bill) 9.69 Next 2 MCF 5.30 Next 3 MCF 4.95 Next 4 MCF 4.88 Next 40 MCF 4.78 Next 50 MCF 2.05 Next 100 MCF 1.71 Next 100 MCF 1.50 Next 700 MCF 1.43 Next 1,000 MCF 1.24 Next 13,000 MCF 1.11 All over 15,000 MCF 1.06 Note: Rates do not include purchased gas adjustment and sales tax, where applicable. "(2) Outside city limits: 2010 -2011 GAS RATE ORDINANCE 07082010A —237— Rate per MCF Monthly Consumption , August 1, 2010 --July 31, 2011 Meter Charge $ 15.02 First 1 MCF (minimum bill) 11,95 Next 2 MCF 5.94 Next 3 MCF 5.54 Next 4 MCF 5.44 Next 40 MCF 5.33 2010 -2011 GAS RATE ORDINANCE 07082010A —237— Next 50 MCF Page 4 of 8 Next 100 MCF Next 100 MCF Next 700 MCF 2.30 1.92 1.68 Next 1,000 MCF Next 13,000 MCF All over 15,000 MCF 1.60 1.39 1.24 1.19 "Note: Rates do not include purchased gas adjustment and sales tax, where applicable. "(c) Seasonal customers (partial year service) rates. (All customers who have requested a cutoff and re- connection at the same location or for services to the same premises, including increases or reductions of the same premises, and which cutoff was not necessitated by reason of reconstruction of the building on the premises, shall be classified as seasonal customers, and in lieu of the rates applicable to residential customers, shall be charged and collected the following charge for gas furnished and delivered to the meters by the gas department of the city): "(1) Inside city limits: Monthly Consumption Meter Charge First 1 MCF (minimum bill) Next 2 MCF Next 3 MCF Next 4 MCF Next 30 MCF Next 20 MCF All over 50 MCF r Rate per MCF August-17-2004-41113144r 2410 August 1, 2010 --July 31, 2011 $ 1.00 1 5.71 14.19 10.46 6.74 2.89 2.47 2.05 Note: Rates do not include purchased gas adjustment and sales tax, where applicable. "(2) Outside city limits: Monthly Consumption Meter Charge 2010 -2011 GAS RATE ORDINANCE 07082010A —238— Rate per MCF August 1, 2010 -,July 31, 2011 $ 1.25 First 1 MCF (minimum bill) Next 2 MCF Next 3 MCF Next 4 MCF Page 5 of 8 18.87 15.89 11.72 Next 20 MCF Next 20 MCF 7.55 3.24 All over 50 MCF 2.77 2.30 "Note: Rates do not include purchased gas adjustment and sales tax, where applicable. "(d) Incentive air cooling and conditioning rate customers rates. (Limited to customers using Tess than fifteen thousand (15,000) MCF per month annual average. All general rate customers that have installed total energy or have gas operated air cooling and air conditioning equipment, or both, and have an average used in MCF per month in the seven (7) summer months that exceeds the five (5) winter months in average use, when inspected and approved by the gas department, who request in writing to be billed in the summer months on the summer incentive gas rate schedule starting with Cycle 11 in April and ending with the billing Cycle 10 in November shall be billed on the following rate schedule): "(1) Inside city limits: Monthly Consumption Meter Charge Rate per MCF August 1, 2010 -,July 31, 2011 First 1 MCF (minimum bill) Next 2 MCF Next 3 MCF Next 4 MCF $ 12.02 9.69 5.30 4.95 Next 40 MCF 4.29 Next 150 MCF Next 100 MCF Next 700 MCF 3.62 1.54 1.43 Next 1,000 MCF 1.24 Next 13,000 MCF 1.11 All over 15,000 MCF 1.06 1.01 "Note: Rates do not include purchased gas adjustment and sales tax, where applicable. 2010 -2011 GAS RATE ORDINANCE 07082010A —239— Page 6 of 8 "(2) Outside city limits: Monthly Consumption Meter Charge Rate per MCF August 1, 2010—July 31, 2011 First 1 MCF (minimum bill) Next 2 MCF Next 3 MCF Next 4 MCF $ 15.02 11.95 5.94 5.54 Next 40 MCF 4.80 Next 150 MCF Next 100 MCF Next 700 MCF 4.05 1.72 • 1.60 Next 1,000 MCF 1.39 Next 13,000 MCF 1.24 All over 15,000 MCF 1.19 1.13 "Note: Rates do not include purchased gas adjustment and sales tax, where applicable. "(e) Purchased gas adjustment. The rates in subsections (a), (b), (c), and (d) of this section are subject to gas cost adjustments as follows: Rates will be adjusted monthly by the city following the receipt of notice of the cost of gas from the supplier to pass on to the consumer the full amount of such cost adjusted for pressure base and gas loss and unaccounted -for factors. Additional fees and charges paid to the supplier, which are necessary for the city to receive the gas, shall be included in the cost of gas. All general rate customers, who consume over fifteen thousand (15,000) MCF in one (1) month, and who receive gas from the city's distribution system at the same pressure base at which the city receives the gas from its supplier (14.65 psi), shall be billed 2.05 per cent less per MCF for purchased gas adjustment than the general customer rate schedule. "(f) Interruptions. Deliveries of gas to commercial or industrial customers may be interrupted or curtailed in case of shortage, or threatened shortage, of gas supply from any cause whatsoever, to conserve gas for residential and other human need customers served hereunder, according to all mandatory orders of governmental agencies having jurisdiction. 2010 -2011 GAS RATE ORDINANCE 07082010A —240— Page 7 of 8 Section 2. Section 55 -63, Code of Ordinances is revised to read as follows: "Sec. 55 -63. Charges for lighting, etc., of natural gas appliances. "(a) Customers at a residential, apartment, or mobile home address shall be charged a service fee for lighting, adjusting, or turning off one (1) or more natural gas appliances, or the conversion of burner orifices to bum natural gas. The service fee includes service to all gas appliances at the address for which service is requested. The-Unless otherwise noted, the service fees are as follows: "(1) Twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each appliance service order between April 1 and October 31. "faand-f-eft3/LForty dollars ($40.00) for each appliance service order between November 1 and March 31. "13) Twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each service order associated with gas lamp Iiaht ups, adjustments, and turn offs. "(4) Twenty dollars ($20.00) per hour for maintenance or repairs to gas lamps. "(b) All other customers shall be charged twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each appliance lighted, adjusted, or turned off between April 1 and October 31 and forty dollars ($40.00) for each appliance lighted, adjusted, or turned off between November 1 and March 31. "(c) Maintenance of appliances is not included in the lighting and adjusting of any gas appliance except for gaslight mantles and glasses, which will be billed to the customer requesting service at a retail price over and above the charge set forth above. "(d) However, in the event the head of a household is sixty -five (65) years of age or above, or the recipient of Social Security disability payments and resides at a residential, apartment, or mobile home address, then no charge shall be made by the city for the first service call made within any calendar year. Proof of eligibility for the exemptions shall be provided in a form to be prescribed by the director, gas operations." SECTION 3. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shah not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance be given full force and effect for its purpose. SECTION 4. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. 2010 -2011 GAS RATE ORDINANCE 07082010A —241— Page 8 of 8 That the foregoing ord'na a was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the /day of , 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame � Priscilla Leal Chris N. Adler John E. Marez Brent Chesney Nelda Martinez Larry R. Elizondo, Sr. r0 Mark Scott Kevin Kieschnick ,A/21 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame Priscilla Leal Chris N. Adler John E. Marez Brent Chesney Nelda Martinez Larry R. Elizondo, Sr. Mark Scott Kevin Kieschnick PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2010. ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED: 8TH day of July, 2010: R. Ja ' ei ng Fi As ' tent City Attorney For City Attorney 2010.2011 GAS RATE ORDINANCE 07082010A —242— Joe Adame Mayor Page 1 of 2 ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 35- 147(d), CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, REGARDING PIPELINE REPORTING FEES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. Section 35- 147(d), Code of Ordinances, is revised to read as follows: "Sec. 35-147. Pipeline information reporting requirements. * * "(d) An annual fee in the amount of one hundred twenty five dollars ($4- 00.09)-{$125.00} for administrative costs shall be remitted by each operator or owner for each pipeline on or before March 31 of each year with the annual safety report letters required in section 35 -147 paragraph (c). No single owner or operator shall be required to pay more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) in administrative costs for the first year of this reporting requirement, which report shall be due March 31, 1994." * * * SECTION 2. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance be given full force and effect for its purpose. SECTION 3. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. 2010 -2011 PIPELINE REPORTING FEE ORDINANCE 07122010.DOC —243— Page 2 of 2 That the foregoing ordinan a was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the ',day of , 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame Priscilla Leal Chris N. Adler John E. Marez Brent Chesney / V V Nelda Martinez Larry R. Elizondo, Sr. /� Mark Scott Kevin Kieschnick That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame Priscilla Leal Chris N. Adler John E. Marez Brent Chesney Nelda Martinez Larry R. Elizondo, Sr. Mark Scott Kevin Kieschnick PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2010. ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED: 12TH day of July, 2010: R. J . y ' eining First Assistant Ci Attorney For City Attorney Joe Adame Mayor 2010 -2011 PIPELINE REPORTING FEE ORDINANCE 07122010.DOC —244— Page 1 of 4 ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 55 -100, 55 -102, AND 55 -148, CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, REGARDING WASTEWATER RATES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. Section 55- 100(a), Code of Ordinances, is revised to read as follows: "Sec. 55 -100. Schedule. "(a) The monthly charge to be paid by users of sewer service furnished by the city's municipal sewer system, except as otherwise provided in articles VII and XI of chapter 55, shall be based on the amount of water used by the user according to the following rates: Classification Inside city limits One- family minimum monthly charge (first 2,000 gallons) Inside city limits One - family per 1,000 gallons over 2,000 August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011 7 $ 20.76 Inside city limits One- family maximum monthly charge (up to 25,000 gallons) 4:92 4.20 Outside city limits One - family minimum monthly charge (first 2,000 gallons) Outside city limits One- family per 1,000 gallons over 2,000 92.46 117.36 21.81 25.95 Outside city limits One - family maximum monthly charge (up to 25,000 gallons) 8 8.85 191.81 229.50 2010 -2011 WASTEWATER RATE ORDINANCE 07082010 —245— Page 2 of 4 Inside city limits Commercial minimum monthly charge (first 2,000 gallons) 25.28 32.12 Inside city limits Commercial per 1 ,000 gallons over 2,000 3.41 Outside city limits 36,60 Commercial minimum monthly charge (first 40.15 2,000 gallons) Outside city limits Commercial per 1,000 gallons over 2,000 6 83 SECTION 2. Section 55 -102, Code of Ordinances, is revised to read as follows: "Sec. 55 -102. Method of establishing charges for customers using unreclaimed steam, etc. "(a) Those establishments that, due to using water in their product, for unreclaimed steam, or for other purposes where such water does not find its way to the sewer system, may, at their own expense, install a separate meter within their system to effectively measure the volume of such water so as to pay sewer charges only on that which is deposited in the sewer. "L1This meter may meter either the water system using the sewer or the remaining quantity, as long as the two (2) systems are kept separate and apart and the utilities office is notified of the type of water metered. The city reserves the right to inspect such systems as a portion of the water service connections, as set out in sections 55 -20 through 55 -32. Failure to provide such sewer meter will be taken as agreement to pay the sewer charge on all water metered to the customer." SECTION 3. Section 55- 148(a)(8), Code of Ordinances, is revised to read as follows: "Sec. 55 -148. Fees. "(a) Abnormal wastewater surcharge. "(8) The values for X, Y, and Z used in subdivision (6) of this subsection to determine the abnormal wastewater surcharge are: 2010 -2011 WASTEWATER RATE ORDINANCE 07082010 —246— Page 3 of 4 Value August-47-2009-40401Y-31T40-10 August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011 X (unit charge in dollars per pound of $0.0000 COD) Y (unit charge in dollars per pound of 09 BOD) 0.3696 Z (unit charge in dollars per pound of TSS) 0.2419 0.2654 * * SECTION 4. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance be given full force and effect for its purpose. SECTION 5. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. 2010 -2011 WASTEWATER RATE ORDINANCE 07082010 —247— Page4of4 That the foregoing ordin� a was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame _'Y1 Priscilla Leal Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry R. Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick /vp- John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame Priscilla Leal Chris N. Adler John E. Marez Brent Chesney Nelda Martinez Larry R. Elizondo, Sr. Mark Scott Kevin Kieschnick PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2010. ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED: 8T" day of July, 2010: R. J . - - Ening Fi st Assistant Ci For City Attorney Attorney 2010.2011 WASTEWATER RATE ORDINANCE 07082010 —248— Joe Adame Mayor Page 1 of 6 ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 18.1(b)(12), CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, REGARDING FIRE CODE FEES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. Section 18- 1(b)(12), Code of Ordinances, is amended by revising the Fire Prevention Permit Fee Schedule to read as follows: "Sec. 18 -1. Fire prevention code. "(b) Additions, deletions, and changes are made to the International Fire Code, 2003 Edition, and correlated to the appropriate paragraph numbers in the [International Fire Code] as follows: "(12) Sections 105.8 -- 105.10 are added to read as follows: "105.8 Fee Schedule. Applications for permits shall be accompanied by the payment of fees in accordance with the Corpus Christi Fire Prevention Permit Fee Schedule, as follows: Corpus Christi Fire Department Fire Prevention Permit Fee Schedule Permit Fee Fire /Arson reports After Hours Inspection Surcharge Airports, heliports and helistops Assembly, A 1 or A -2 Automatic sprinklers, standpipes, and fire lines (testing) 2010 -2011 FIRE CODE FEE ORDINANCE 07082010A —249— Fee $-430 $ 0.1D per page 50.00 per hour 3 hour minimum surcharge 100.00 annually 100.00 annually 100.00 per visit Page 2 of 6 Churches (one time fee-no day care facility on premises) 6-7-00 100.00 Combustible fibers (storage and handling) 100.00 annually Commercial Vent -a -Hood cleaning 50.00 annually Compressed gas 100.00 annually Cryogenic fluids 100.00 annually Day care facilities (or similar short -term occupancies) 60.00 75.00 annually Demolition w/ explosives 250.00 per event Dry cleaning plants 100.00 annually Explosives, blasting agents and ammunition storage 150.00 annually Extinguishing systems 00.00 100.00 per inspection Fire alarm systems 75.00 per floor Fire alarm systems (required 15,000 square foot zones) 75.00 per zone Fireworks display (aerial) 250.00 per display Fireworks display (non- aerial) 150.00 per display Flammable and combustible liquids 100.00 annually 2010-2011 FIRE CODE FEE ORDINANCE 07082010A —250— Flammable finishes Page 3 of 6 Foster homes and group homes 100.00 annually Fumigation and thermal insecticide fogging Hazardous chemicals 6C1,00 75.00 annually 350.00 annually High piled combustible stock 100.00 annually High rise life safety system (testing before issuance of C. of 0.) Hospitals and nursing homestead) 100.00 annually 200.00 per test 250.00 per facility plus 1.20 per bed Liquified natural gas 250:ee annually Liquified petroleum gas Lumber storage 100.00 annually 100.00 annually Mechanical refrigeration Open burning 100.00 annually €10 00 100.00 annually Organic coatings 0 300.00 per day 100.00 annually 2010 -2011 FIRE CODE FEE ORDINANCE 07082010A —251— Plans review Pressure test (fuel storage tanks and/or product lines) Repair garages Restaurants (facilities that accommodate 100 or less occupants) Restaurants (facilities that accommodate more than 100 occupants) Special Events Permits Exhibits /Shows Flame Effects Visual Inspection Special handling fee (less than 24- hours' notice) Tank vehicles for flammable and combustible liquids Tents and air supported structures Tire rebuilding plant Underground /aboveground fuel tanks (installation and removal) Wrecking yard, junkyard or waste handling Page 4 of 6 150.00 per review 100.00 per visit 100.00 annually 7440 100.00 annually 100.00 annually 100.00 150.00 50.00 100.00 per inspection 100.00 annually 75.00 annually 1 00.00 annually 100.00 per inspection 100.00 annually "105.9 Applications and fees required for failure to pass inspections. If a site does not meet the standards for issuance of a permit after the first inspection r2) inspeotipr s, the applicant must submit a new 2010-2011 FIRE CODE FEE ORDINANCE 07082010A —252— Page 5 of 6 application and pay a permit fee before any subsequent inspections will be conducted, "105.10 Burning permits. Burning permits will not be issued unless both fire prevention and environmental control division approve the material to be burned." SECTION 2. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance be given full force and effect for its purpose. SECTION 3. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. 2010.2011 FIRE CODE FEE ORDINANCE 07082010A -253— Page 6 of 6 That the foregoing ordir a was read for he first time and passed to its second , 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame Priscilla Leal reading on this the day of Chris N. Adler John E. Marez Brent Chesney 7�J Nelda Martinez Larry R. Elizondo, Sr. Mark Scott Kevin Kieschnick That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame Priscilla Leal Chris N. Adler John E. Marez Brent Chesney Nelda Martinez Larry R. Elizondo, Sr. Mark Scott Kevin Kieschnick PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of 2010.. ATTEST: Armando Chapa Joe Adame City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: 8TH day of July, 2010: R. R fining F' st A- istant City Attorney For City Attorney 2010 -2011 FIRE CODE FEE ORDINANCE 07082010A —254— AN ORDINANCE CREATING NEW SECTION 19 -105, CHAPTER 19, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES REGARDING REINSPECTION OF FROZEN DESSERT MACHINES AND RELATED FEE; AMENDING THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 23, CODE OF ORDINANCES: SECTION 23 -18, ENTITLED "SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR CLINICAL HEALTH SERVICES AND POLICIES RELATED TO THE IMPOSITION AND COLLECTION OF SUCH FEES," TO REVISE EXISTING FEES AND APPLICABLE PROVISIONS; AND SECTION 23 -19, ENTITLED "FEE FOR LABORATORY TESTING OF WATER SAMPLES, TO REVISE THE TITLE AND ESTABLISH NEW FEES FOR VECTOR SERVICES; CREATING NEW SECTION 23 -24, ENTITLED "RENTAL AND USE OF FACILITIES," REGARDING RENTAL OF THE AUDITORIUM, EQUIPMENT, AND FEES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. A new section 19 -105, of Chapter 19 of the Code of Ordinances, entitled "Fee for reinspection of frozen dessert machines," is created, to read as follows: "Sec. 19-105-19-111, . Fee for re- inspection of frozen dessert machines. "A fee of $50 will be charged for each re- inspection of a frozen dessert machine, including a soft serve ice cream machine. "Sec. 19-106-19-111. Reserved. SECTION 2. Section 23-18, Chapter 23, of the Code of Ordinances, entitled "Schedule of fees for clinical health services and policies related to the imposition and collection of such fees," is amended to read as follows: "Sec. 23 -18. Schedule of fees for clinical health services and policies related to the imposition and collection of such fees. "(a) Unless otherwise provided in this section, a fee will be charged to each patient for each visit to any city - county public health clinic facility funded in whole or in part by the city. The fees must be based upon federal poverty income guidelines and must be in the following amounts: "Schedule of Fees for Clinical Health Services "TABLE INSET: Poverty income (per cent) Family Size ChargeNisit Maximum Charge/ Family 0-99 100-199 200- -299 300 + 1-8 1-8 1 - -8 1 - -8 $ 0.00 5.00 10.00 30.00 $ 0.00 10.00 30.00 No maximum EHord3D4 "(b) The fee fora visit to the sexually transmitted disease clinic for an exam, lab work, or treatment is fifteen dollars ($15.00). The fee fora blood test at the sexually transmitted disease clinic is ten dollars ($10.00). "(c) No recipient or client eligible for Medicaid shall be charged a fee in addition to the amount reimbursable by Medicaid. "(d) No recipient or client eligible for Title XX family planning services shall be charged a fee. (The maximum income limit for Title XX family planning services is one hundred fifty (150) per cent of the federal poverty income level.) "(e) Each city - county public health clinic will determine if a person is able to pay in accordance with the appropriate schedule; however, the clinic will not deny services because of a person's inability to pay. "(f) Patients or clients whose incomes are above the -two hundred (200) per cent plus poverty level will be referred to the private sector for care unless extenuating circumstances exist. Such circumstances include the provision of immunization services, prevention and control of communicable diseases, unusually high medical expense or the unavailability of specific services that are needed. Such Persons qualifying for such exceptions may receive care at the city - county public health ramie clinics in accordance with the schedule of fees. "(g) A city - county public health clinic may not charge a fee which exceeds the reasonable cost to the clinic of providing service under the applicable clinical program or if prohibited by federal funding requirements. —256— Page2of6 "(h) The city - county public health clinic shall make a reasonable effort to collect the fees, but the clinic may waive collection if the administrative cost of collection will exceed the fee to be collected. "(i) The city - county public health department may modify, suspend, or terminate services to a person, determined able to pay, for nonpayment of fees after notice to the person and opportunity for a hearing. The criteria upon which the city - county public health department will take such action is when the person fraudulently or deliberately misrepresents a material fact about his or her eligibility, ability to pay, or the application of the schedule of fees to him/her. The city - county public health department will conduct such a hearing in accordance with the formal fair hearing procedures specified in title 25, Texas Administrative Code." SECTION 3. Section 23 -19, entitled "Fee for laboratory testing of water samples," is amended by revising the title and expanding the section to include and establish fees for vector services, to read as follows: "Sec. 23 -19. Fee for vector services and laboratory testing of water samples. "The director of public health is authorized to establish a schedule of fees to be charged for vector services and for laboratory testing of water samples. These schedules must be submitted to the city manager for approval and must be reviewed on an annual basis. The fees may not be increased annually by more than twenty -five (25) per cent nor may new fees be created without city council's approval by motion or resolution. The approved sehed-u-le schedules must be filed with the city secretary and copies must be provided to the city council." SECTION 4. A new section 23 -24, entitled "Rental and use of facilities" in Chapter 23, is added to the Code of Ordinances, to read as follows: "Sec. 23- 24 ---23 2L Resarvedr- Rental and use of facilities. "(a) The director is empowered to prepare and sign rental and use agreements for the rental of the auditorium and equipment at the health department facility. All rental and use agreements shall be signed by the director or the city manager's designee under the following conditions: "(1) The form of every instrument used for a particular purpose shall be approved by the city attorney, provided, however, that this does not require the signatory approval of the city attorney on each document executed pursuant to this section; and "(2) All blanks are filled and information is provided as required by the document. EHord3O4 Page 3 of 6 -257- " b Verbal arran ements #o rent and use an facilities will not be recognized under any circumstances and this article. An executed rental and use agreement shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties and may not be altered unless done so in writing and signed by authorized representatives of both parties. " c All a reements shall rovide that artier contractin for the rental and use of the auditorium and equipment shall hold the City harmless from any and all liability for any claim or claims as a result of use and rental of the remises a ui ment or other property. and shall nrovide for the indemnification of the City in case of any claims resulting from the renter's operations or use or occurring as a result of their occupancy of the premises and use of the property. All agreements shall specifically include such provisions. u(d) The director shall apply any deposit against any amounts owed to the City for the rental and use of the facilities /equipment, and the director may refuse to enter into any agreement until any and all amounts due the City by any person or organization for the planned rental have been paid in full. "(e) The director, or the director's representative or designee, may enter rented facilities at any time for the purpose of ensuring that parties comply with the provisions of this article and the applicable rental and use agreement. "(f) The director shall prepare a schedule of rental rates for the use of the auditorium and fees for City -owned equipment that is available for rent. Facility rates shall bear a reasonable relation to current rates charged for the rental and use of similar commercial facilities so as to neither be excessive nor grossly deficient by comparison. Fees for the rental of City - owned equipment shall bear a reasonable relation to cost and depreciation of such equjpment to allow the City to recover the acquisition, maintenance, and replacement costs of such equipment as necessary. Unless specifically stated in an agreement, the use of City -owned equipment is not included in the rental of the auditorium. The schedule shall be submitted to the City Manager for approval and shall be reviewed on an annual basis, provided, however, no such rate or fee may increase annually by more than twenty -five (25) per cent nor shall new rates or fees be created without the City Council's approval by motion or resolution. The approved schedule shall be filed with the City Secretary and copies provided to the City Council. Specific rates, however, may be adjusted at any time, and the director shall have the authority to negotiate special rates for special situations. "Sec. 23-25-23-29. Reserved." SECTION 5. The initial Vector Services fee schedule and the initial Health Facilities rental and use fee schedule are incorporated in this ordinance by reference and are attached to this document as Exhibits A and B, respectively. EFford3o4 –258– Page 4 of 8 SECTION 6. The provisions of this ordinance are effective on and after August 1, 2010, SECTION 7. A violation of any provision of this ordinance or requirements implemented under this ordinance constitutes an offense punishable as provided in this ordinance and in Sections 1 -6 and 1-6.1 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 8. If, for any reason, any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, it will not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite intent of the City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, phrase, word, and provision of this ordinance be given full force and effect for its purpose. SECTION 9. Publication of this ordinance is to be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. EHord3O4 —259— Page 5 of 6 The fo oing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on the day of 9..t ectr , 2010, by the following votes: !v� Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott The foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed on its final reading on the day of , 2010, by the following votes: Joe Adame Priscilla G. Leal Chris N. Adler John E. Marez Brent Chesney Nelda Martinez Larry Elizondo, Sr. Mark Scott Kevin Kieschnick PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 2010. ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED as to form: July 8, 2010 Elizabeth R. Hundley Assistant City Attorney for the City Attorney EHord3D4 —260— Joe Adame Mayor Page6of6 Exhibit A VECTOR SERVICE FEES DESCRIPTION Vector Control Services A. Rodent Pest Control B. Residential Customers: Mosquito Treatment Bee Removal To be effective on and after August 1, 2010 FY 10 -11 $ 50 per Visit $ 50 per Treatment $ 50 per Removal Exhibit B HEALTH FACILITIES - RENTAL AND USE FEES DESCRIPTION FY 10 -11 Auditorium Rental Meeting space Exercise 8 days per month or 2 days per week To be effective on and after August 1, 2010 $ 300.00 per event $ 150.00 per month AN ORDINANCE AMENDING VARIOUS PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 21 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, ENTITLED "GARBAGE, TRASH AND OTHER REFUSE" TO REVISE EXISTING FEES, ADD NEW DEFINITIONS AND LANGUAGE, AND ESTABLISH NEW FEES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. Sections of Chapter 21, Code of Ordinances, entitled "Garbage, Trash and Other Refuse," are amended by revising existing fees, adding new definitions and language, and establishing new fees, to read as follows: Sec. 21 -1. Definitions. As used in this chapter, the following terms shall mean: Act: The Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq. Bulky items: The following large items that have been specifically authorized for collection of specified days under section [21 -14] of this chapter: indoor and outdoor furniture, mattresses and box springs, carpet, swing sets, plastic swimming pools, large toys, bicycles, fish aquariums, and large household appliances. Can account: A commercial or residential account who sets out its solid waste in conventional refuse receptacles of one hundred - gallon or less capacity for collection by a permitted solid waste hauler. CERCL4: The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq. Clean wood waste: Individual pieces of wood of the type normally sold by lumber yards and home improvement centers that is free of hardware and other large fasteners, such as hinges, hurricane straps, latches, etc., and is not attached to concrete, wallboard, roofing materials, or other construction materials. Collection services: The service of collecting solid waste and transporting it to a point of final disposition. Constructionldemolition materials: Waste resulting from construction or demolition projects, including brick, concrete, concrete rubble, gypsum board, lumber, sheetrock, roofing materials, fixtures (such as bath tubs, shower stalls, sinks, and toilets), and remodeling debris (such as cabinets, ceramic tile, Formica, and similar items). Conventional refuse receptacle: A conventional refuse receptacle is a container constructed of some substantial leakproof material (galvanized metal, aluminum, plastic, or rubberized vinyl), of the type commonly sold in retail establishments, with a tight -fitting lid or cover with handles sufficiently strong to be safely handled by a collector. Current utility bill: A current utility bill is a bill issued by the city's utility business office that includes a charge for curbside collection of garbage, which was issued within sixty (60) days of the date on which a service is sought. Customer :: A person who receives collection services from the deparent Solid Waste Operations Department. Debris: Large waste materials, such as construction /demolition materials, ashes, roofing materials, dirt, automobile frames, tires, or other bulky heavy materials. Department: The solid waste sewiaes operations department of the city. Director. The Director of Solid Waste Se-wises Operations of the City of Corpus Christi, or a designated representative of the director. Disposal services: The service of disposing of solid waste at a municipal solid waste landfill site or other point of disposal. Dumpster: A container, which holds more than one (1) cubic yard, used to store solid waste until it is collected for disposal. The term also includes roll -on /roll -off containers that are used to transport solid waste on vehicle chassis. E waste: Electronic-type waste. such as surplus, obsolete, or broken electronic and electrical devices includin• but not limited to radios vacuum cleaners small household appliances, television sets, microwave ovens, computer hard drives and monitors. Garbage: Putrescible animal or vegetable matter, such as waste material and refuse usually associated with the preparation of food from kitchens, residences, grocery stores, butcher shops, restaurants, cafes, hotels, rooming houses, and boardinghouses, but does not include sewage, body waste, or industrial byproducts. Generator: Generator means the person that creates a solid waste. For the purposes of this chapter, a construction or repair contractor or landscape or tree service is considered to be the generator of any solid waste that is produced by the contractor or service or results from the contractor's or service's work on the premises of a customer. A business or commercial establishment is considered the generator of any packaging materials on products delivered to a customer, which are returned to the business or commercial establishment that made the delivery. Graffiti: Graffiti is defined in section 33 -101 of the Code of Ordinances. Hazardous waste: Hazardous waste means solid waste identified and listed as a hazardous waste by the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency under the Federal Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 U.S.C. 6901, et seq.). Heavy brush: Tree and shrub limbs and trimmings, which are greater than three (3) inches in diameter, tree trunks, root balls, and other large plant matter. Household appliance: General household appliance that will not fit into a refuse receptacle including: EHord345 Non -metal appliance, such as a television set, stereo system, video cassette recorder (VCR), microwave oven, and other similar item constructed primarily of plastic or other non - metallic parts. —264— Page 2 of 16 Metal appliance, such as a stove, cooking range, oven, dishwasher, washing machine, clothes dryer, refrigerator, window air conditioning unit, water heater, lawn mower or edger, and other similar items constructed primarily of metal parts. Household waste: Garbage, rubbish, yard waste, debris, and limited construction/demolition materials commonly generated by a residential household, which can be placed within a conventional refuse receptacle that weighs less than fifty (50) pounds. Lifter.' Any rubbish, paper, napkins, straws, cups or containers made of paper, plastic, Styrofoam (or other similar material), bottles, glass, candy or gum wrappers, remnants of food, cans, or remnants or parts thereof, or any material of an unsanitary nature. Medical waste: Waste generated by health -care related facilities and associated health- care activities, including veterinary services, but not including garbage or rubbish generated from offices, kitchens, or other non - health -care activities. Permitted solid waste hauler: A permitted solid waste hauler for hire or permitted solid waste self hauler. Permitted solid waste hauler for hire: Any person that collects, transports, or disposes of solid waste of another person who has a solid waste hauler permit issued under Article VI11 of the chapter. Permitted solid waste self hauler. Any person, business, commercial establishment, or industrial facility, other than a residential customer, that collects, transports, or disposes of solid waste generated by the person, business, commercial establishment, or industrial facility, who has a solid waste hauler permit issued under Article VIII of the chapter. Rear door pickup: Collection service where solid waste is picked up in a location other than the designated standard collection point. Recyclable: A waste material, which has been designated by the director for inclusion in the city's recycling program, that has a useful physical or chemical property after serving its original purpose that may be reused, sold as a commodity, or converted into another product. Recycling bin or cart: A container issued by Solid Waste Operations and utilized for the placement and collection of recyclable materials. Refuse: A mixture of garbage, rubbish, and other waste that are normally placed in a receptacle for collection and disposal, but does not include yard waste, heavy brush, debris, or construction /demolition materials. Roll -on /roll -off container.: A bulk container that holds more than one (1) cubic yard used to collect and store solid waste that transported on a vehicle chassis for disposal. Rubbish: Non - decayable solid waste, excluding ashes, that consist of combustible materials, such as paper, rags, cartons, wood, rubber, plastics, and similar materials, and noncombustible matter, such as glass, crockery, metal cans, and similar materials that do not burn at ordinary incinerator temperatures. Single- stream recycling (also known as "fully commingled "): a system in which all paper fibers and containers and other waste items, such as plastics and glass, are mixed together in a EHord305 -265- Page 3 of 16 collection truck instead of bein sorted into se crate commodities news a er cardboard etc. and handled separately throughout the collection process. Solid waste: Garbage, rubbish, yard waste, heavy brush, debris, and construction /demolition materials. TCEQ: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, formerly known as the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC). Tipping fee rate: The rate charged to a commercial vehicle disposing of solid waste at a city disposal site. Trash: A single item of rubbish, not otherwise defined as debris or construction /demolition material, but including a small household appliance that will not fit into a conventional refuse receptacle. Yard waste: Grass clippings, weeds, leaves, mulch, small trees and shrub limbs, which are Tess than three (3) inches in diameter and less than five (5) feet in length, and other similar 'plant matter. * * * Sec. 21-4. Mulch sales. (a) The director of Solid Waste Operations shall sell mulch from the city's brush and yard waste grinding program based on the following fee schedule: Up ton tons, per ton ... $ 1.0:90 20.00 Over 10 tons, per ton ... 9,94;) $ 18.00 (b) The director of Solid Waste Operations shall allow residential customers to load for themselves, at no charge, small quantities of mulch, up to one pickup truck load. Sec. 21 -5. Proper disposal required. Any person who collects, transports, or disposes of any solid waste generated within the city or who transports any solid waste within the city shall dispose of the solid waste at a facility that is authorized by the TN-RGG TCEQ to accept the type of solid waste that the person has collected or transported. * * * Sec. 21 -10. Collection services available, unless properly refused. (a) The collection services of the Solid Waste Services Operations Department shall be available to every residence, business, or commercial establishment or other occupied premises within the City of Corpus Christi. Collection services are provided only for waste generated at the premises for which the required fees are paid. EHord305 —266— Page 4 of 16 (c) Any owner, occupant, tenant or lessee of a business or commercial establishment or residential properties containing more than two (2) family dwellings and, beginning August 1, 2010 residential ro erties containin more than ei ht -famii dwelijn s re ardless of the number of water or as meters on site, and, who does not desire the collection services of the department provided for in this article shall not receive the services and shall not be charged for such services upon notification of the city's utility business office that: (1) The person does not want the services rendered to the premises; (2) The person intends to and will remove the accumulated solid waste at the premises; (3) The person will keep the premises in such condition that the person will not violate the applicable provisions of this Code and other ordinances; (4) The person will not, after such notice, use directly or indirectly the collection services of the department. (d) * * * (e) For purposes of this section, all residential premises containing eight- family dwellings or less required by this ordinance to subscribe to city collection services which were legally served by a private collection service , as of August 1. 2010, are exempt from the requirement to subscribe to collection services of the Department until such time as the private collection service contract ceases for the particular property served. (f) Nothing contained in this section prohibits the department from serving such premises at the request of the residents. (g) All residential properties exempted by this section shall subscribe to collection services of the department upon the termination of the private collection service. (h) * * * Sec. 21 -11. Recycling program. (a) The recycling program of the Solid Waste .Secvises Operations Department collects recyclables from single family residences and commercial accounts that receive collection services from the department. (b) * * * (c) Recyclables shall be placed in a recycling bin or cart available from the soI,d watee services department Solid Waste Operations Department or other conventional refuse receptacle that is clearly identified with the recycling symbol provided by the department. Containers with recyclables to be collected shall be separated from other solid waste,, wheh-an a set out for collections and from any fixed object that impedes collection by the department by at least five (5) feet. EFiord3O5 —267— Page 5ofl6 e Rec clin bins and carts may not be laced on the street avement in the utter in a draina • e ditch or on a sidewalk exce 't the director ma allow rec clip • bins and carts to be e ditches when there is no • ractical alternative. However the . erson who laces an rec clin bin or cart in a roadside drains a ditch ma be liable for an floodin damage caused by the refuse receptacles. if) Recycling bins and carts shall be set out for collection before 7:30 a.m. on the designated collection day, but may not be set out prior to 5:00 a.m. on the designated collection day. (g) Recycling bins and carts set out for collection must be removed from the collection location not later than midnight on the designated collection day. laced in roadside draina Sec. 21 -13. Heavy brush and clean wood waste collection. (a) * * * * * * (e) Heavy brush and clean wood waste may be set out only on days designated for set out for that address. (1) Notice of the sections of the city that are allowed to set out heavy brush and clean wood waste is published weekly in a paper of general distribution within the city. Information is also available by telephoning the Solid Waste Services Operations Department. (2) It is a defense to prosecution for violation of this section that the heavy brush and clean wood waste was set out on an unauthorized day if the heavy brush and clean wood waste was set out after the authorized set out period, but before the next heavy brush /clean wood waste pickup at that address. The property owner or occupant has the burden of proving the date the heavy brush and clean wood waste was set out and the date of the next heavy brush /clean wood waste pickup. * * * Sec. 21 -14. Bulky items. (a) * * * * * (e) Bulky items may be set out only on days designated for set out for that address. (1) Notice of the sections of the city that are allowed to set out bulky items will be published in a paper of general distribution within the city. Information is also available by telephoning the Solid Waste Services Operations Department. (2) It is a defense to prosecution for violation of this section that the bulky items were set out on an unauthorized day if the bulky items was set out after the authorized set out period, but before the next bulky items pickup at that address. The property owner or EHord345 Page 6 of 16 —268— occupant has the burden of proving the date the bulky items was set out and the date of the next bulky items pickup. * * * Sec. 21 -15. Brick, broken concrete, ashes, dirt, etc., not included. (a) The Solid Waste Serises Operations Department will not collect accumulations of brick, broken concrete, plaster, sand, gravel, ashes, tires, roofing materials, dirt, automobile frames, lumber (other than clean wood waste generated by a residential customer) resulting from either residential or commercial construction or demolition, or any other bulky heavy material. (b) The owner or person controlling an accumulation of brick, broken concrete, plaster, sand, gravel, ashes, roofing materials, dirt, automobile frames, lumber resulting from either residential or commercial construction or demolition, or any other bulky heavy material shall collect and store the solid waste in commercial waste receptacles, such as a dumpster, demolition box, or metal roll -off container, of-and dispose of the solid waste within one week of the time the waste is generated at the owner's or person's expense. Sec. 21 -16. Hazardous waste and medical waste not included. (a)—The Solid Waste Servioos Operations Department will not collect hazardous waste or medical waste. Sec. 21 -18. Tires et out for collection. (a) A total of up to four tires may be set out for collection on the designated collection day for bulky items. (b) If any tires in excess of the four allowed under this section are set out for collection, in addition to any fine that may be assessed for a violation of this article, the director shall assess a surcharge, as described in section 21-40(a)(13) for each tire in excess of four set out for collection that is picked up, which will be applied to the customer's next monthly utility bill. Sec. 21 -19. Limitation on filling receptacles. (a) * * * * * * (e) All waste placed in a garbage receptacle must be contained within a paper or plastic bag. Sec. 21 -21. Draining refuse; decomposable matter to be wrapped. EHord365 -269- Page 7 of 16 (b) Garbage and other matter, which is subject to decomposition, must be wrapped in paper or other suitable material and placed in a paver or plastic bap that will contain the products of decomposition before being placed in a garbage receptacle. (c) * ** Sec. 21 -22. When and where solid waste is to be placed for collection -- generally, (a) * * * (b) If the house, building or premises from which solid waste is to be collected is adjacent to an alley, the collection of solid waste shall be from the alley unless the alley has not been constructed to support solid waste collections. as determined by the Director. (c) If there is no guilt^ the director determines that it is not practicable to collect and remove the solid waste from an alley, or other special circumstances exist, the solid waste will be collected in the front of the premises, on the right -of -way other than the street pavement, in the gutter, in a drainage ditch, or on a sidewalk, unless the director shall designate an area or areas for collection of such solid waste. (d) Refuse receptacles may not be placed on the street pavement, in the gutter, or-in a drainage ditch, or on a sidewalk, Except except the director may allow refuse receptacles to be placed in roadside drainage ditches when there is no practical altemative. However, the person who places any refuse receptacles in a roadside drainage ditch may be liable for any flooding damage caused by the refuse receptacles. (e) Solid waste shall be set out for collection before 7:30 a.m. on the designated collection day, but may not be set out prior to 5: 00 a.m. on the designated collection day, unless set out in a closed container with a lid that is latched or otherwise secured to the container, so the lid will not open if the container is tipped on its side. Refuse receptacles set out for collection must be removed from the designated collection location not later than midnLQht on the designated collection day. (f) Not more than five (5) two (2) containers may be set out for collection by a residential customer. (1) There is no limit on the number of containers of used gift wrapping and boxes that may be set out on the first collection day for a residential customer after C#ristnaas the following select holidays: Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day, and New Year's Day. (2) There is no limit on the number of containers or boxes that may set out on the first collection day of a new residential customer. (3) The director may grant waivers to the rules in this subsection to allow residential customers to set out more than five-45) two (2) containers on an occasional basis. Sec. 21 -23. Trash that cannot be placed in a receptacle. EHord345 -270- Page 8 of 16 (494 Lai Except on routes serviced by automated equipment, which are regulated by section 21- 27, yard waste that is set out for collection with regular household waste; which is not i^ a bag 21 12(c). must be contained in a paper or plastic baa and fit into the refuse receptacle in such a manner that the lid of the receptacle remains closed. • cotlectet can#ent& - - Sec. 21-27. Collection services on routes with automated collection equipment. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, at residences and businesses that are on collection routes serviced by automated equipment: (1) All refuse must be enclosed in a paper or plastic bag and placed inside the provided container. (2) Any refuse placed outside the container will not be collected with the trash in the container. EHord305 (3) Any refuse that will not fit in a container may only be set out for collection on a day designated for setting out waste under section 21- 13(b). (4) If any refuse that will not fit in a container is set out for collection on a day not authorized for setting out waste, in addition to any fine that may be assessed for a violation of this ordinance, the director shall assess the surcharge for each pile of debris, as described in section 21- 40(a)(11), for each pile of trash set out for collection that is picked up. The surcharge shall be applied to the customer's next monthly utility bill. (5) All refuse receptacles set out for collection must be removed from the designated collection location not later than midnight on the designated collection day. -271- Page 9of16 * * * Sec. 21 -30. Disposal services -- Available. (a) The disposal services of the Solid Waste Services Operations Department are deemed available to every premises occupied for residential use within the City of Corpus Christi, and the customer shall pay the charges therefor. (b) * * * * * Sec. 21 -32. Same—Disposal of brick, broken concrete, ashes, dirt, etc. (a) The routine disposal services of the Solid Waste Operations Department do not include brick, broken concrete, plaster, sand, gravel, ashes, roofing materials, dirt, automobile frames, lumber or similar material resulting from either residential or commercial construction or demolition, or any other bulky heavy material. (b) * * * * Sec. 21-40. Charges- -For collection services within the City of Corpus Christi. (a) The following charges apply to the collection of solid waste from went Solid Waste Operations Department customers located within the limits of the City of Corpus Christi. In addition to the charges listed below, each customer is liable for any applicable federal /state surcharges or fees specified in section 21 -20 and state and city taxes. The charges for collection services are: TABLE INSET: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) One- family dwelling Two - family dwelling on one (1) water and/or gas meter Two- family dwelling to eight - family dwelling on separate water and/or gas meters Apartment One- family dwelling and single apartment on one (1) water and/or gas meter Apartment house, travel trailer park, or manufactured home park on one (1) water and/or gas meter 1,�aiifit Per Month or Fraction Thereof Collection 815.91 16.91 $31.g2 33.82 $15.91 16.91 eaeh per unit $15.91 16.91 per unit $31.82 33.82 $15.91 16.91 per unit Ekard305 —272— Page 10 of 46 (7) (8) (9) (10) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) Apartment house, travel trailer park, or manufactured home park - -Each apartment, travel trailer pad, or manufactured home site on separate water and/or gas meter Additional charge for rear door pickup on any type above Additional loads of heavy brush or bulky item at time of scheduled heavy brush or bulky item collection Surcharge for bulky item pickup Special non - scheduled heavy brush, clean wood, waste, debris, or bulky items pickup, including pickup of heavy brush and debris set out more than two (2) weeks prior to the scheduled pickup of brush or debris that is a traffic, safety, or health hazard Recycling containers: Each solid waste services customer account will pay a fee for recycling containers that will be refunded upon termination of the account and return of the recycling containers Surcharge for tires set out for collection on a non - designated collection day Garbage cart delivery fee -- assessed for every second and additional residential cart delivered and for every third and additional commercial cart delivered per account EGOITifliefeiftli Monthly collection fee on second and additional residential and commercial carts Recycling Incentive Program collection of bins and carts Recycling education — surcharge Recycling cart assessed per cart 815.91 16.91 per unit $11.86 per unit $641-3 75.00 per Load $1 1.00 12.00 per item Actual cost not to exceed $200.00 per load $ 6.00 per container $ 5.00 per tire $10.00 per cart $ 100 10.00 per cart $0.68 per month $0.25 per month $1.00 per month (b) Except as provided in section 21-41, any residence, apartment, or other premises that does not receive collection services from the department under the provisions of section 21 -10 of this chapter; will not be charged collection or disposal fees. (c) * ** (d) A business and commercial institutions—establishment and any other occupied premises located within the City of Corpus Christi, except a residence covered by subsections (a) and (b) of this section, shall be charged for collection services by the department at a rate determined by the director based on the following: (1) EHord305 —273— Page 11 of 16 (2) The director may not set a rate below thi y-o a dollars end eighty-two cents ($31.82) thirtv -three dollars and eighty -two cents ($33.82) a month (the minimum rate), plus any applicable state disposal fees and state and city taxes. e An business or commercial establishment or an other occu led remises located within the cit and desirin collection of rec clables shall be char ed the rec clin service fees outlined in subsections (a)(15) -(17) of this section. Sec. 21-41. Charges- -For disposal services. (a) * * * * * * (d) Before disposing of any solid waste, a person who does not have billing account with solid the Solid Waste Operations Department and will be required t., _ut shall make a deposit based upon the estimated size of the Toad as determined by the landfill superintendent; or an employee designated by the superintendent. The minimum deposit will be the commercial charge for one (1) ton of solid waste. (e) The following fee schedule applies to each load of solid waste deposited at a disposal site operated by the department: (1) Residential customers. TABLE INSET: A B C D E Corpus Christi residential customer for trash, yard waste, heavy brush, bulky items, large household appliances, and clean wood waste, but no construction/demolition materials. (The director shall determine what form of identification is required to prove that the individual is a resident of the city.) Corpus Christi residential customer for construction/demolition materials Corpus Christi residential customer during community clean up events approved by the director Non - Corpus Christi resident, who is covered by a special agreement between the City of Corpus Christi and another agency for solid waste disposal, hauling individual's household waste in personally owned, non - commercial vehicle. (The director shall determine what form of identification is required to prove that the individual is a beneficiary of the special agreement.) Any other individual hauling the individual's own household waste in personally owned, non - commercial vehicle No charge No charge onist month No charge As specified in the special agreement Commercial tipping fee rate per load, plus special fees for appliances and tires EMord3o5 —274— Page 12 of 15 (2) Commercial vehicles (tipping rate). TABLE INSET: A B Solid waste by weight Loose load of solid waste, not weighed $36.86 per ton* $ 9.99 per cubic yard* C Compacted load of solid waste, not weighed $13.21 per cubic yard* D Construction and demolition debris, not weighed $13.21 per cubic yard E F Heavy brush and yard waste, not weighed Commercial vehicle transporting household waste for a residential customer when accompanied by the residential customer. (The residential customer must be the driver or a passenger in the commercial vehicle or arrive in a separate vehicle at the landfill with the residential customer's waste.) $13.21 per cubic yard No charge J *Includes state disposal fee, state /federal mandated surcharges as provided by section 21-42. (3) Special fees. TABLE INSET: A Clean, uncontaminated dirt that is suitable for landfill use (as determined by landfill superintendent or designee of the superintendent) No charge B C D Clean wood waste, heavy brush, or rubble suitable for recycling, including crushed concrete, asphalt, bricks, etc. Large household appliances, such as stoves, washing machines, clothes dryers, dishwashers, refrigerators, or other similar items, except large household appliances transported in a non- commercial vehicle by a residential customer who resides within the city Tires $ 9.57 per ton $ 739 10.00 each Automobile Truck or large trailer tires (16 - -19 ") EMord305 —275— $ 1.25 1.75 $ 2.25 2.75 Page 13of16 E F C Tractor tires (< or = 20 ") Larger than 20" Cut into quarters or more Vehicles with loads not adequately secured so as to prevent any of the contents of the transported load from being ejected or dropped during transport of the load Use of scales Any solid waste that requires special preparation, handling, or cover $ 3.25 3.75 Not accepted Tipping fee rate $ 579 10.00 $25.25 As determined by the director Sec. 21-44. Bills for services; when charges payable. (a) The utilities billing office shall include on their monthly bills mailed to persons that receive collection and disposal services from the Solid Waste Operations Department all applicable charges for services rendered to the premises of that person. * * * Sec. 21 -72. Illegal disposal of solid waste prohibited. (a) * * * (b) A person, or the person's agent or employee, may not dispose or allow or permit the disposal of any solid waste at a place within the city or within five thousand (5,000) feet of the city's boundary, including on or within three hundred (300) feet of a public road, right -of -way, any portion of the municipal separate storm water sewer system, park, or coastal waters, including tributaries to the coastal waters, except at the following locations: (1) * (2) A private solid waste disposal facility permitted by the TNNRCG TCEQ. (3) * EMord3O5 —276— Page 14 of 16 (4) At a place designated for the collection of solid waste by section 21 -22, but only when the solid waste is placed by a customer for collection by the Solid Waste Operations Department or a private collection contractor. * * * (c) * ** Sec. 21 -73. Director of solid waste sewises operations authorized to enter premises. (a) (b) * ** * ** SECTION 2. With the exception of new service fees related to recycling shown in Section 21- 40(a)(15) -(17) of Section 1 of this ordinance, the provisions of this ordinance are effective on and after August 1, 2010. The new recycling service fees listed in Section 21 -40(a)(15) -(17) of Section 1 of this ordinance are effective on and after January 1, 2011, subject to City Council approval and implementation of a single- stream recycling process prior to January 1, 2011. SECTION 3. A violation of any provision of this ordinance or requirements implemented under this ordinance constitutes an offense punishable as provided in this ordinance and in Sections 1 -6 and 1 -6.1 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 4. If, for any reason, any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, it will not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite intent of the City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, phrase, word, and provision of this ordinance be given full force and effect for its purpose. SECTION 5. Publication of this ordinance is to be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. EHord305 —277— Page 15 of 16 The foregoing ordinance was ead for the first time and passed to its second reading on the ay of , 2010, by the following votes: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick /412-4,1;/- Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott The foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed on its final reading on the day of , 2010, by the following votes: Joe Adame Priscilla G. Leal Chris N. Adler John E. Marez Brent Chesney Nelda Martinez Larry Elizondo, Sr. Mark Scott Kevin Kieschnick PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 2010. ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED as to form: July 8, 2010 Eliz- h R. Hundley Assi ant City Attorney for the City Attorney EHord305 —278— Joe Adame Mayor Page 16 of 16 1 ORDINANCE AMENDING CODE OF ORDINANCES CHAPTER 17 TO ESTABLISH FEES FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE: $25 CCTV COMMUNITY EVENT BULLETIN BOARD SLIDE FEE, AND $75 /HOUR FEE FOR VIDEO PRODUCTION SERVICES, AND INCLUDE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AUDIO VIDEO SERVICES AFTER BUSINESS HOURS FEE OF $50/HOUR; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Chapter 17, Finance and Taxation, is amended by adding new Section 17- to read as follows: "Sec. 17 -22. Public Information Office Fee Schedule. "(a) Administrative fee for CCTV Community Event Bulletin Board Slides: $25.00 per slide per month. "(b1 Video Production Services for small area cities or counties: $75.00 per hour, subject to available resources of the Public Information Office. The Director of Public Information Office is authorized to negotiate higher hourly rates based on complexity of services requested. "(c) Council Chambers Audio Video Services after normal business hours, as approved by Resolution 028524: $50.00 per hour? SECTION 2. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance be given full force and effect for its purpose. SECTION 3. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 4. This Ordinance takes effect August 1, 2010. H:\LEG- DIRILisa12010 Ordinance\Public Information Office Fees.doc —279— That the foregoing ord)nar)ce was read for he first time and passed to its second reading on this the - day of , 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Efizondo, Sr, Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally an this the day of , 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2010. ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED as to form: la By: D - - Lisa Agu'fa , Assistant City Attorney for the City Attorney Joe Adame Mayor AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, CHAPTER 2 REGARDING $5.00 LOST LIBRARY ITEM PROCESSING FEE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the City Code of Ordinances, Chapter 2, Administration, Article IV, Division 3, Library Board, Section 2 -79 Fees, is amended to add new fee for processing lost items, and read as follows: "Sec. 2 -79. Fees. (a) Overdue fees: (1) Each tan item, per day: $0.25 (2) Maximum overdue fee: Actual replacement cost or original cost of item, whichever is greater (b) Collection fee: $10.00 Any account of twenty -five dollars ($25.00) or more that is unpaid for sixty (60) days or more, and is referred for collection to a private vendor, shall be assessed a ten - dollar (10.00) collection fee. (c) Photocopy fee, per page: $0.15 (d) Lost Library Item Processing fee: $5.00 per lost library item, in addition to payment of list price for replacement of the lost item. The $5.00 lost library item processing fee will be refunded if the item is found and returned to the library." SECTION 2. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance be given full force and effect for its purpose. SECTION 3. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 4. The effective date of this ordinance is August 1, 2010. H:ILEG- DIR \Lisa12010 Ordinance\Library.doc —281— That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the /3/1L-- day of r 1 j , 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Af9 Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame Priscilla G. Leal Chris N. Adler John E. Marez Brent Chesney Nelda Martinez Larry Elizondo, Sr. Mark Scott Kevin Kieschnick PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2010. ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED as to form: By: Lisa Aguilipl, Assistant City Attorney for the City Attorney Joe Adame Mayor AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 3 V2 -2, CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, RELATING TO THE FEES CHARGED FOR ALARM SYSTEMS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. Section 3 V2-2 is revised to read as follows: Sec. 3 112 -2. Permit required; fees. "(a) The Corpus Christi Police Department will not respond to any alarm notification from an alarm site that does not have a valid permit, unless the alarm notification was a duress alar)n, a hold -up alarm, a panic alai, or reported to a 9 -1 -1 emergency telephone number by a person other than an alarm company. "(b) A person commits an offense if the person operates, or causes or allows to be operated, an alarm system on premises under the person's control or ownership or at its a airh site without a valid alarm permit issued by the Corpus Christi Police Department. The Corpus Christi Police Department and Corpus Christi police officers are authorized to enforce this provision, and to issue citations for violations. "(c) A separate permit is required for each alarm site and for each alarm unit. No exemptions shall apply except as required by federal or state law. The burden of proof shall be with the person asserting the exemption. "(d) The annual, nonrefundable fee for an alarm permit is twent.frthirty-five dollars ($5-00 $35.00) for residential and fifty sixty dollars ($59) $60.00) for commercial. "(e) A permit is valid for one (1) year from the date of its issuance and may be renewed every year upon submission of a renewal invoice. It is the responsibility of the pert holder to submit a renewal invoice ten (10) days prior to the permit expiration date, "(f) All peri itt fees owed by an applicant must be_paid before a per it may be issued or renewed. Unpaid petmft fees my result in a revocation of the pt**t." SECTION 2. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance be given full force and effect for its purpose. SECTION 3. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 4. This Ordinance takes effect on August 1, 2010. HAILEG- DIR\Lisal2010 Ordinance\AMEND ALARM PERMIT FEE 201 O.doe —283— That the foiegoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the /3—day of , 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adarne Chris Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2010. ATTEST: Armando Chapa Joe Adame City Secretary Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: 7th day of July, 2010: Lisa Aguilar Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney 2 23 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: July 13. 2010 AGENDA ITEM: An Ordinance amending Chapter 14 "DEVELOPMENT SERVICES," Article XIII, "DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FEES ", Division 1, 'TECHNICAL CONSTRUCTION CODE FEES ", Section 14 -1302, "STANDARDIZED BUILDING VALUATION"; Section 14- 1304, "PROCESSING AND PLAN REVIEW FEE "; Section 14 -1306, "SPECIAL FEES"; Section 14 -1307, "REDUCED FEES "; Section 14 -1312, "ACCOUNTING'; and Section 14 -1313, 'TECHNICAL CONSTRUCTION CODE FEE SCHEDULES ", of the Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi, to provide for minimum permit fees, simplified methods to calculate building permit fees and plan review fees; to provide for expedited plan review by internal staff; to provide for special inspections on non - standard days and hours; to provide for fees for construction site offices, fees for both standard and duplicate certificates of occupancy, fees for temporary events, penalty fees, inspections outside of the City limits, electrical permit fees, plumbing permit fees, mechanical permit fees, fuel gas permit fees, swimming pool fees; and providing for fees for existing applications made prior to the effective date; providing for severance; providing a repealer clause; and providing an effective date. ISSUE: The proposed budget for the City's Department of Development Services 2010 -2011 fiscal year includes decreased allocations from the General Fund. To maintain current department funding and service levels, it is also necessary to increase Department revenues for 2010 -2011. The proposed ordinance amendments establish fee increases necessary to generate the additional revenues included in the proposed budget. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: City Council is requested to consider for approval the First Reading of the proposed Ordinance Amendments. Attachments: Ordinance 44/4k F4A1, Juan Perales, Jr., P.E. Asst. City Manager, Engr. & Dev. Svcs. JohnnyP@octexas.com (361 )826 -3828 1 ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 "DEVELOPMENT SERVICES," ARTICLE XIII, "DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FEES ", DIVISION 1, "TECHNICAL CONSTRUCTION CODE FEES ", SECTION 14 -1302, "STANDARDIZED BUILDING VALUATION "; SECTION 14 -1304, "PROCESSING AND PLAN REVIEW FEE "; SECTION 14 -1306, "SPECIAL FEES "; SECTION 14 -1307, "REDUCED FEES "; SECTION 14 -1312, "ACCOUNTING "; AND SECTION 14 -1313, "TECHNICAL CONSTRUCTION CODE FEE SCHEDULES ", OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TO PROVIDE FOR MINIMUM PERMIT FEES, SIMPLIFIED METHODS TO CALCULATE BUILDING PERMIT FEES AND PLAN REVIEW FEES; TO PROVIDE FOR EXPEDITED PLAN REVIEW BY INTERNAL STAFF; TO PROVIDE FOR SPECIAL INSPECTIONS ON NON - STANDARD DAYS AND HOURS; TO PROVIDE FOR FEES FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE OFFICES, FEES FOR BOTH STANDARD AND DUPLICATE CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY, FEES FOR TEMPORARY EVENTS, PENALTY FEES, INSPECTIONS OUTSIDE OF THE CITY LIMITS, ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES, PLUMBING PERMIT FEES, MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES, FUEL GAS PERMIT FEES, SWIMMING POOL FEES; AND PROVIDING FOR FEES FOR EXISTING APPLICATIONS MADE PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; PROVIDING A REPEALER CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF OCTOBER 1, 2010; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. SECTION 1. Code of Ordinances, Chapter 14, Development Services, Article XIII, Development Services Fees, is amended by revising the Article to read as follows: "Division 1. Technical Construction Code Fees. Sec. 14 -1301. General requirements. (a) Fees required. A fee must be paid for any installation, alteration, addition, change, or repair that requires a permit under the technical construction codes. (1) A permit may not be issued until the prescribed fees have been paid. (2) An amendment to a permit may not be released until any additional fees, due to an increase in the estimated cost of the building, structure, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, gas, or energy conservation systems, have been paid. (Ord. No. 25467, § 1, 9 -9 -2003) Sec. 14 -1302. Standardized building valuation. (a) The standardized building valuation system to be used to compute construction permit fees will consider the total value of all construction work, including plumbing, electrical, paving, parking, driveway approach, energy conservation, fuel gas, mechanical equipment, and other systems, including appurtenances and site improvements, materials, labor, contractor's profit and overhead. (1) The valuation of building, alteration, or structure used in computing building permit fees will be based on, and at least equivalent to, the latest standardized building valuation data as published by the International Code Council Building Safety Journal, as adjusted by the latest regional construction cost adjustment factors published annually by Engineering News Record. The building official may H:1LEG•DIR1Lisa12010 OrdinanceWee Table - legislative version7.20.2010.doc 2 alternatively accept a comparable valuation submitted by the applicant. The applicant's valuation shall be verified against the Elimination of Architectural Barriers Report, if one is required, and the higher of the two (2) valuations shall be used. In the event the Elimination of Architectural Barriers Report valuation is not available prior to issuance of the permit, the Elimination of Architectural Barriers Report valuation shall be confirmed prior to conducting the final inspection. If additional permit fees are required, the final inspection shall not be passed until all fees are paid. If no Elimination of Architectural Barriers Report is available, the building official may refer to the latest standardized building valuation data as published by the International Code Council Building Safety Journal, as adjusted by the latest regional construction cost adjustment factors published annually by Engineering News Record. (2) The applicant for a construction permit may appeal any determination of the Building Official to the building code board of appeals. (3) Standardized building valuations required pursuant to paragraph (1) will be used as the basis for paftiAl permitting of a project, .. .. - (4) Standardized building valuations required pursuant to paragraph (1) for pre - engineered metal building warehouses must be values derived pursuant to paragraph (1). (5) Standardized building valuations required pursuant to paragraph (1) will be derived from the latest data published by International Code Council Building Safety Journal and Engineering News Record and adjusted based on the regional multiplier published by the International Code Council. (6) The standardized building valuations referred to in paragraph (1) are adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this section. (7) If, in the opinion of the Building Official, or the Building Official's authorized representative, the valuation of a commercial building, alteration, structure, electrical, energy conservation, fuel gas, mechanical, or plumbing systems appears to be underestimated on the application, the permit may be denied, unless the applicant can show detailed estimates or appraisals that meet the approval of the Building Official. Alternatively, the Building Official may set the permit valuation pursuant to the standardized building valuation data adopted in paragraph (1), and issue the permit with a fee based on that valuation. Permit valuations must be based upon total construction cost, such as electrical, energy conservation, fuel gas, mechanical, plumbing equipment and other systems, including materials and labor, site improvements, contractor's profit and overhead. (b) When determining the value that is applied to the fee schedule, values are rounded up to the next higher one thousand dollar - valuation category. Sec. 14 -1303. Calculation of building area for residential construction. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, building area includes all rooms and spaces within the main structure, except for attached (1) covered patios open to the environment and (2) front and rear porches open to the environment. (b) The building area for residential roofinglre- roofing includes attached garages, covered patios open to the environment, and front porches and rear open to the environment. (c) Accessory residential construction includes room additions, storage rooms, utility rooms, garages, carports, patio covers, raised decks, skate board ramps, greenhouses, portable buildings, gazebos, and other similar uses. Sec. 14 -1304. Processing and plan review fee. (a) A processing and plan review fee must be paid in addition to the regular permit fee as in the fee schedule published in Table 13 -1. (b) The plan review fees must be paid at the time application is filed for each application processed and reviewed for the purposes of obtaining a permit as required by the technical construction codes, including except: H:\LEG- DIR\Lisal2010 Ordinance\Fee Table- legislative version7.20.2010.doc 3 (1) (2) Additions., 11.Permits categorized over the counter as deemed by the Building Official. An official list will be Published each calendar year. (e) () (c) Plan review fee is non - refundable. {e)- (il) A third party plan review or inspection may be requested by the applicant at the time the application is filed. The fee for a third party plan review or inspection requested by the applicant pays the costs of services of an approved third party consultant and the applicable overhead rate. The fee for a third party plan review requested by the applicant must be paid at the time the application is filed. The fee for a third party inspection requested by the applicant must be paid prior to the inspection. The fees for third party plan review and inspection requested by the applicant are listed in the fee schedule in section 14 -1313. Third party consultant contracts are available through the development services department. (e) Expeditedplan review by internal staff may be requested by the applicant at the time the application is filed. The expedited fee is payable at the time of application submittal according to the fee schedule published in Section 14 -1313. Expedited Plan Review does not constitute an approval of submitted plans. Sec. 14 -1305. Minimum fee. In the event the total fees, under the applicable fee are less than designated minimum fee, the minimum permit fee applies. r. . Sec. 14 -1306. Special fees. (a) Re-out inspection. A re -out inspection fee is required for the purposes of obtaining a temporary and/or permanent electrical release. (1) A separate re -out inspection fee will not be charged when a certificate of occupancy fee has been paid. (2) If the re -out inspection is performed concurrently with the electrical permit inspection, and the electrical permit fee has been paid, a separate re -out inspection fee will not be charged. (b) Failure to obtain permit. (1) The applicable surcharge and investigation fee must be paid to help defray the additional cost of inspection for work that has already been done, before the required permit is issued. (2) The surcharge is not a penalty, and does not precludes any other remedies available to the city to enforce the technical construction codes. The collection of the surcharge and investigation fee made is to help defray the cost of additional inspections and administrative time to research and issue the required permits. (3) The surcharge and investigation fee is not required for emergency work commenced under section 14- 215(f). However, if the required permit is not obtained within twenty-four (24) hours, excepting weekends and holidays, the permit fee must be doubled or the surcharge paid, whichever is greater. (c) Re- inspection fee . When a re- inspection fee has been assessed under section 14- 222(g)(1), re- inspection fee must be paid. H:1LEG- DIR1Lisa12010 Ordinance\Fee Table-legislative version7,20.2010.doc 4 (d) Survey fee . A survey fee will be collected for fire surveys, code compliance surveys, construction status surveys, building evaluations, repossession surveys, etc. (e) Relocation surveys . A relocation survey fee will be collected for performing relocation surveys to determine the minimum code compliance requirements for structures proposed to be relocated (moved) and placed back in operation. (f) Permit research . A permit research fee will be collected for research to provide verification of legal descriptions, property dimensions, ownerships and/or other construction related data from permit files, etc. The cost of duplication of documents will be charged as allowed under the Texas Public Information Act. (g) Inspections outside the city . Additional fees will be charged for inspections made outside the city limits. (h) Administrative fee for permit extension . When an extension of a permit is required, an administrative fee must be paid before the extension is granted. (1) Renewal of expired permit . The holder of an expired permit, who desires to reactivate the permit and has performed work under the permit, must pay the administrative fee for a permit extension and an additional re- inspection fee equal to the greater of twenty-five (25) per cent of the applicable permit fee or the minimum re- inspection fee. (j) Re- inspections . The permit holder or his agent must pay a re- inspection fee in accordance with the permit fee schedule, prior to a re- inspection, A re- inspection is required when: (1) It has been found that the portion of the construction for which an inspection was requested is not ready for the inspection. (2) Corrections that were called for have not been made. (3) The premises are not made readily available for inspection. (4) The work, construction, installation of wiring, piping, or other equipment or systems is found to be faulty or incorrectly or defectively installed. (k) Certificate of occupancy for existing buildings. When an application for a new certificate of occupancy for an existing building or space is made, a processing and compliance investigation fee must paid at the time of application. (1) Duplicate certificate of occupancy . In the event that a certificate of occupancy is lost or destroyed, a duplicate certificate of occupancy may be issued provided that a fee is paid in accordance with the permit fee schedule. inspectors. (n) (m) Multiple plan review fee. After the second plan review of corrections submitted in response to plan review comments, an escalating fee will be assessed for each subsequent submission up to the total amount of the plan review fee. Partial responses shall be treated as additional responses following the first partial response in resubmission. Applicant may appeal the fee to the building official or assistant city manager for development services to review and determine if comments to applicant were legible, accurate, and reasonably understandable. If the building official or assistant city manager for development services determines the comments to be faulty no fee will be assessed. Sec. 14-1307. Reduced fees. (a) Permit and survey fees for public schools, federal state, county and municipal government and other political subdivisions having ad valorem tax exempt status, and for churches and all other state constitutionally exempted ad valorem tax entities is fifty (50) per cent of the regular permit fee; if the building and land on which the building is situated is owned and used by the tax exempt entity. However, a reduced permit fee may not be less than the minimum fee regularly charged. A reduced fee may not be paid when work has been commenced without proper permits. H:1LEG- DIR\Lisa12010 OrdinanceTee Table - legislative version7.20,2010.doc -291 - 5 Sec. 14 -1308. Refunds. (a) Canceled permit. A permit may be canceled upon written application by the applicant at any time within two (2) months of the date of the issuance of a building permit or within two (2) months of the date of issuance of any electrical, mechanical, or plumbing permit. If no work has been done under such permit, the permit fee may be refunded when formally requested in writing by the applicant, provided that the city must retain a cancellation fee to cover the cost of auditing the fee and preparing the request for refund. In all other instances regarding any fees for which a refund is requested due to contract default, lease cancellation, or other similar circumstances, the city must retain the minimum permit fee to cover the cost of auditing the fees and preparing the request for refund. Plan review fees are non - refundable. (b) Multiple plan review fee appeal. A refund may be requested upon written application by the applicant after an appeal has been made to the building official or assistant city manager for development services and approved by either one. (Ord. No. 25467, § 1, 9 -9 -2003; Ord. No. 027645, § 4, 4 -8 -2008) Sec. 14 -1309. Reserved. Editor's note: Ord. No. 027645, § 8, adopted Apr. 8, 2008, repealed § 14 -1309, which pertained to fees rounded off and derived from Ord. No. 25467, § 1, adopted Sept. 9, 2003. Upon calculation of the total fee for any permit, the fee must be rounded up to the nearest dollar before payment is made. Sec. 14 -1310. Fees for examinations and licenses. (a) The required examination fee for a license to qualify electricians of all classes must accompany the application for a license. (b) Any required license fee must be paid before the issuance of a license. (c) The license fee must be paid annually. Licenses are valid for only in the calendar year in which the fee is paid. A license is not valid unless and until the license fee has been paid for the calendar year. (d) Duplicate licenses may be issued to replace a lost or destroyed license, if the license holder presents provided satisfactory evidence that the license was loss or destroyed, and the licensee pays the fee for the duplicate license. Sec. 14 -1311. Contractor registration fees. An electrical, mechanical, plumbing contractor and a lawn irrigator or backflow prevention assembly tester must pay an annual registration fee to maintain a current status as a registered contractor. Individual who holds multiple registrations must pay separate fee for each registration. Sec. 14 -1312. Accounting. (a) The building official must keep a permanent accounting of all permit fees and other monies collected, the names of all persons upon whose account the fees were paid, along with the date paid and amount of the fees. (b) A periodic financial audit of fee revenues and expenditures shall be conducted. The audit shall occur not less than once every three (3) years, - . .. - - ! ! : ! ! ` . • : ! !' ! - . . The audit shall include a report of fees that are authorized to be collected, the amount of each authorized fee that was actually collected, and the amount of fees that should have been collected. The audit shall also provide a detailed accounting of the uses of the fees. The audit shall make any recommendations for improvements or corrections. The audit shall include a report on the amount of fees that need to be H:1LEG- DIR\Lisa12010 Ordinance\Fee Table- legislative version7.20.20]O.doc 6 collected in order to make the development services special fund independent of subsidies from the general revenue fund. Sec. 14 -1313. Technical construction codes fee schedules. The following fee schedules apply to activities under article 11 of this chapter: TABLE INSET: PLAN REVIEW FEES AMOUNT OF FEE Residential plan nt review— re tor of: $0.02'1 per per square foot Commercial plan review Gr ater of: ° - - - - 6,6 ! E t - :. ".. .. _ , . ; . . . . , .. _ .. .tt °, ..' . - - !tit . . .. . : . . - 111 ■ 1. Plan Review Fees (Based as a percentage of The Building Permit Fee) Valuation $0 -1 Million 35% of the Building Permit Fee $1 Million + 40% of the Building Permit Fee Multiple plan review fee 15% of original plan review fee for third review submittal; 30% of original plan review fee for fourth review submittal; 45% of original plan review fee for fifth review submittal; 60% of original plan review fee for sixth review submittal; 75% of original plan review fee for seventh review submittal; 90% of original plan review fee for eighth review submittal; 100% of original plan review fee for ninth and above review submittals Third party plan review when requested by applicant Contract rate + 32% overhead rate Expedited Plan 150% of the Plan Review Rate Review (Internal Staff) H:1LEG- DIR \Lisa12010 OrdinancelFee Table - legislative version7.20.2010.doc —293— 7 TABLE INSET: BUILDING PERMIT FEES - ($80.00 Min. Permit Fee) AMOUNT OF FEE Commercial construction building permits - - • - e!t $75.00 . - . . . . . . . ..• •: -� - - - .,. - $37.80 $6.075 per $400 valuation $2,000 .... .. ... .. .. - A i! - l i $147.15+ $4,05 per $1 valuation t)VCT $20,000 . .. . , . • . .. -- - .. `. $503.55- $2.025 per $1,000 valuati-on ever $110.000 . .. ... _ .• .. $0 to $1 Million .60% of Valuation $1.001 to $5 Million Valeof Valuation $5.001 to $10 Million .70% of Valuation $10.001 to $20 Million of Valuation V alu $20.001 Million + .70% of Valuation Construction site offices $45.90 $80.00 H:1LEG- DIR\Lisa12010 Ordinance\Fee Table- legislative version7.20.2010.dac —294— Sii;ns Sign Electrical Permit for Signs, per transformer Residential construction building permits New one - and two- family dwellings, apartments, townhouses, condominiums, Accessory buildings. Remodel, and Repair Swimming Pool Roofing and Siding 2nd Drivewav Residential — Other Re -out inspection to establish electrical service in a home 14'here no service has exi sted in the previous 90 days <300 sguefe-feeiaf -area- TABLE INSET: H:1LEG- DI R \Lisa12O 10 Ordinance\Fee Table - legislative version7.2O.20] O.doc —295— 8 $108.00 $6.75 Min Fee $80.00 50.16 per sEtuaye-feet if building area- 0.50% of Valuation $75.00 $0.16 per square feet $52.65 80.00 $.0'11 sq. ft $.045 sq.ft. wee $80.00 575.00 $80.00 $75.00 $0.011 per gale feet 9 Fees for Moving structures — Both Residential and Commercial House moving permit $467.00 Traffic engineering moving route sheet $61.00 Relocation survey $110.25 Survey fee S35.00 per discipline - $140.00 Mobile home /HUD -code manufactured housing installation permit $106.50 TABLE INSET: MISCELLANEOUS CONSTRUCTION FEES Certificate a Occupancy Certificate of occupancy for change of use of existing building or structure I[�� $215.00 Duplicate certificate of occupancy $0.10 per page $10.00 Temporary events Temporary event permit w/o food service $80.00 Temporary event permit wl food service $199.80 Miscellaneous Fees AMOUNT OF FEE Permit extension Greater of: $75.00 $80.00 or 33.75% of permit fee Renewal of expired permit Greater of $74,00 $80.00 or 33.75% of permit fee + H:11,EG- DIR1Lisa12010 OrdinancelFee Table - legislative version7.20.201O.doc 10 H:1LEG- DIR\Lisa12010 OrdinancelFee Table - legislative version7.20.2010.doc permit extension fee Request for refund on canceled permit if no work done $3 7.80 $40.00 Permit research $15.00 per hour f Demolition Permits Demolition permit Greater of: $75 $0.023 per square foot $80.00_ 'or $0.027 per square foot ..- • . •. t t el . - - -- - _ - . $101.25 • - - ... - - - - - $101.25 $816.75 $13.5Oper acre Windstorm engineering • - - - 00.00 per plan - - - . . . remises - pr p - . . . . Penalty Fees . Work commenced but not finished Greater of 2X permit fees or investigative fee Work completed Greater of 2X permit fees or investigative fee Miscellaneous Fees — Investigative fee $337.0 H:1LEG- DIR\Lisa12010 OrdinancelFee Table - legislative version7.20.2010.doc Re- inspection fee Special Inspection Fees $450.00 575.00 $80.00 Inspections outside City, but within ET] Inspection fee + $5400 $80.00+ $1.83 per mile Inspections outside City and ET] Inspection fee + $1.83 per mile + $75.00 $80.00 for each 200 miles Third party inspections when requested by applicant Reduced Fees Contract rate + 32% overhead rate Reduced fee for public schools, Federal, State, county, municipal governments and other political subdivisions with ad valorem tax status Greater of: 50% of regular permit fee or minimum fee ?.S %X Imo" permit fees Minimum fee TABLE INSET: r $75.00 $80.00 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES For Stand Alone Permits Not Associated with a Building Permit -Based H:1LEG- DIR1Lisa120 i 0 Ordinance\Fee Table - legislative version7.20.2010.doc FEE 11 on Valuation Residential Commercial $0 to $1 Million $1.001 to $5 Million 15.001 to $10 Million $10.001 to $20 Million $20.001 Million + Air conditioner Construction loop Fixtures, residential or commercial building and hot water heaters Hot tub, spa H:1LEG- DMR \Lisa12010 OrdiaancelEee Table - legislative version7.20.20] a.doc 0.50% of Valuation .60% of Valuation .65% of Valuation .70% of Valuation .60% of Valuation .70% of Valuation $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $20.04 $0.51 $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $13.50 $13.50 12 13 Services 101 to 2[A amperes $19.5g $30.0•l SergLiees-ever-40.0-anipefes- : $59.74 $6.75 56.75 gYfiniming r. ..t $52.65 $75.00 New residential construction $0.0675per square foot of building area 50.0675 per s €oet-e building arcn $75.00 Replacement license 510.80 $25.00 Technology fee 2.5% e1ectical permit Ices Minimum fee 75.00 --- $80.00 TABLE INSET: — ENERGY CONSERVATION FEES AMOUNT OF FEE $0.0675 per square feet TABLE Fuel Gas Fees Fuel Gas Fees for Stand Alone Permits NOT Associated with a Building Permit Residential 0.50% of Valuation Commercial $0 to $1 Million .60 °I0 of Valuation $1.001 to 55 Million .65% of Valuation H:1LEG- DIRlLisa12010 OrdinancelFee Table - legislative version7.20.2010.doc 14 $5.001 to $10 Million .70% of Valuation $10.001 to $20 Million .60% of Valuation $20.001 Million + .70% of Valuation 5— FUEL. GAS FEES AMOUNT OF FEE . - .. • _ .. -- $6.75 Bach additional meter loop - $6.75 Each line new gas $6:75 Each line new service gas $6.75 Each line replace distribution $6.75 gas Each as line replace service $6.75 Each opening gas $6.75 Each clothes dryer gas $6.75 $6.75 - 2 :: - • $6.75 _ . . Each furnace gas $6.75 Each heater gas $6.75 Each hot water heater $6.75 gas Eacli-gas -le er $6.75 poet Each wall furnace twit $6.75 a gas arca Gets for accessory residential permit construction - squaFe pot ef building area Mirnimunnfee 375.00 $$0.00 TABLE INSET: Mechanical Permit Fees Mechanical Permits Fees for Stand Alone Permits NOT Associated with a Building Perinit Residential 0.50% of Valuation H:1LEG- DIR \Lisa12010 OrdinancelFee Table- legislative version7.20.2010.doc —301— Comniercia] $0 to $1 Million $1.001 to $5 Million $5.001 to $10 Million $10.001 to $20 Million $20.001 Million + MECHANICAL FE S' ltf-Tigeration systems Additional boiler >330,000 BTU (10 BHP) Temporary operation inspection Tcchnologv fe Minimum fee Td1L�� rk ET. Plumbing Code Fees .60% of Valuation .65% of Valuation .70% of Valuation .60% of Valuation .70% of Valuation $75.00 + $9.05 per $-L000 in valuation $75.00 + $4.05 per $'10.50 $90A5 0.0675per square foot of building arca 50.0675per square 875.00 S80.O0 2.5% Y mechanical permit fees 75.00 S80,00 Plumbing Permits Fees for Stand Alone Pernuts NOT Associated with a Building Permit Residential H:1LEG- DIR\Lisa12010 Ordinance\Fee Table - legislative version7.20.2010.doc 0.50% of Valuation 15 Commercial $0 to $1 Million $1.001 to $5 Million $5.001 to $10 Million $10.001 to $20 Million $20.00] Million + construction: Each water service Each water service replace (outside) Each hack flow preventer Each plumbing fixture Each lavatory Each shower Each sink Each slop sink € e+spa Each - -tub bath Each urinal Each w ter closet Each boiler Hot water boiler Steam boiler Each cooling tower H:1LEG- DIR1Lisa120I0 OrdinancelFee Table- legislative version7.20.2010.doc .60% of Valuation .65% of Valuation .70% of Valuation .60% of Valuation .70% of Valuation AMOUNT Oil- $6.75 $6.75- $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $5.75 $6.75 $20.25 16 Each dishwasher Each-drifiking fountain Electric hot water heater Gas hot water hcatcr Bach - lint -i erceptor -- Bach ., ei healer Each pump Each self contained, heatin-e- Vii, water `'ed ice making machine Each water softener Each whirlpool systems Sash building sewer (lateral) Each building drain Bach c.,toh basin €-ate --floor drain I: a ct, hub ., dra: i.0 Each lift station Each manhole Each roof drai-i --- Each sand trap 5 $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $32.'10 $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $25.65 $20.25 $6.75 $6.75 $31.73 $6.75 $31.73 $6.75 $6.75 $31.73 $13.50 $31.73 H:1LEG- ❑IRkLisal2010 Ordinance\Fee Table - legislative version7.20.2010.doc —304— 17 19 CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION FEES Mechanical contractor Plumber Lawn irrigator Backflow prevention assembly tester AMOUNT $135.00 $135.00 $135.00 $135.00 SECTION 2. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance be given full force and effect for its purpose. SECTION 3. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. SECTION 4. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are repealed. SECTION 5. This Ordinance takes effect October 1, 2010. C 1. ..l - 1 r-.. 1 11- ■ • IV .l 11 -1l +" ■! -I- h fin s an emergency due to the need for immediate action r ion o i aff irs an 2 sus ends the Charter rule that re ■ uires consideration of and voting u • on ordinance at two r- • ular rneetin • s so that this ordinance is ■ assed and takes effect upon first read. • as an eme • en measure this the day of ____.201Q , ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary Approved: July 14, 2010, By: \ Lisa Aguilar, Aistant City Attorney for City Attorney THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Joe Adame Mayor H:ILEG- D1R1Lisa12010 OrdinaneelFee Table - legislative version7.20.2010.doc Corpus Christi, Texas Day of , 2010 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings: I /we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council. Respectfully, Respectfully, Joe Adame Mayor Council Members The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott 24 AGENDA MEMORANDUM AGENDA ITEM: July 20, 2010 Resolution declaring the City of Corpus Christi's interest in supporting a private development effort to create an anchor project for future development and re- development in an area in the vicinity of the American Bank Center. ISSUE: Community leaders from the City's public and private sectors have recognized through public forums such as Bold Future that land in the vicinity of the City's American Bank Center is underutilized and does not fully support the use and operation of the facility. The private development firms of Wallace Bajjali Development Partners, L.P. and Innovative Leisure Partners were approached by the City, and indicated an interest in cooperatively seeking to investigate the feasibility of a public-private partnership to develop and re- develop an area in the vicinity of the American Bank Center. During a presentation to City Council during its' July 6, 2010 meeting, Wallace Bajjali's representative, Joe Esch, reported that their preliminary research had determined that a full scale public- private development of the area is not feasible at this time. Mr. Esch also reported, however, that further investigation of pursuing an "anchor" project with two significant private land owners in the area is wan-anted at this time from their perspective. Staff received direction to prepare a resolution of support for the anchor project, to be considered for adoption at the next possible City Council meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends . pproval of the resolution as presented. Off. Juan Perales, Jr., P.E. Assistant City Manager Engineering and Development Services johnnyp @cctexas.com 361-826-3828 Attachments: Agenda Memorandum Additional Background Information Resolution AGENDA MEMORANDUM ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION BACKGROUND: Community leaders from the City's public and private sectors have recognized through various discussions and public forums such as Bold Future that land in the vicinity of the City's American Bank Center is underutilized and does not fully support the use and operation of the facility. In addition, the majority of the property in the vicinity of the American Bank Center is owned by the City of Corpus Christi and the Port of Corpus Christi. The private development firms of Wallace Bajjalii Development Partners, L.P., and Innovative Leisure Partners were approached by the City, and indicated an interest in cooperatively seeking to investigate the feasibility of a public- private partnership to develop and re- develop an area in the vicinity of the American Bank Center. During a presentation by Wallace Bajjali to City Council during its' March 30, 2010 meeting, staff received direction to initiate actions necessary to cooperatively investigate the possibility of a public - private partnership based mixed use development. The April 13, 2010 City Council meeting included an agenda item which provided for adoption of a resolution supporting the proposed project as well as the appointment of a Stakeholder Taskforce intended to serve as a working committee to initiate preliminary investigation of the feasibility of the project. The Stakeholder Taskforce, as adopted, is comprised of seven members, with two being City Council members, two being Port Commissioners, two being representatives of significant private land owners in the area, and one being an "at large" member from the community. The Taskforce was charged with the responsibility of working with the development team to identify the following for the project: ■ Major project goals and guiding principles. ■ Expectations of scope and nature of the involvement of the parties. ■ Limitations and requirements of stakeholders ■ Outline of processes and tasks necessary for proceeding with the project. ■ Estimated project pre - development costs, task schedules, milestones, and respective roles and responsibilities. The Taskforce was also to be responsible for making recommendations to the City Council on moving the project forward, including any letters of intent or memorandums of understanding. June 30, 2010 was established as the date for the Taskforce to present its initial project recommendations to City Council for further action, including a formal Letter of Intent. An organizational meeting of the Taskforce was held on June 2, 2010. However, through this meeting and subsequent independent discussions, it was determined that existing City Council policies and City Codes include requirements that prohibit the membership of the Taskforce as appointed. It was also determined that operational restrictions significantly impact the Port of Corpus Christi's ability to enter into any commitments related to their property in the immediate vicinity of the American Bank Center. This information was relayed to City Council in a presentation by Mr. Joe Esch during the July 6, 2010 Council meeting. In summary, Mr. Esch reported that their preliminary research had determined that a full scale public- private development of the area is not feasible at this time. Mr. Esch also reported, however, that further investigation of pursuing an "anchor" project with two significant private land owners in the area is warranted at this time from their perspective. Staff received direction to prepare a resolution of support for the anchor project, to be considered for adoption at the next possible City Council meeting. PaBd2ref2 RESOLUTION DECLARING THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI'S INTEREST IN SUPPORTING A PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT EFFORT TO CREATE AN ANCHOR PROJECT FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND RE- DEVELOPMENT IN AN AREA IN THE VICINITY OF THE AMERICAN BANK CENTER WHEREAS, Community leaders from the public and private sector have recognized that land in and around the City's American Bank Center is underutilized and does not fully support the use and operation of the American Bank Center; and WHEREAS, A significant portion of the property in and around the City's American Bank Center is owned by the City of Corpus Christi and the Port of Corpus Christi; and WHEREAS, It is desirable to create a regional employment center and mixed use development and destination activity center in this area of the City; and WHEREAS, The private development firms of Wallace Bajjali Development Partners, L.P. and Innovative Leisure Partners ( "The Developer ") were approached by the City and have indicated an interest in cooperatively seeking to investigate the feasibility of a private development effort to develop an anchor project which will assist in the City's effort to develop and re- develop an area in the vicinity of the American Bank Center; and WHEREAS, It is desirable to take steps to support and encourage the business relationships necessary to pursue the development process. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1, The City of Corpus Christi hereby declares its interest in investigating the feasibility of a private development effort to develop an anchor project which will assist in the City's effort to develop and re- develop an area in the vicinity of the American Bank Center. Section 2. In furtherance of this effort the City hereby declares its support and encouragement for the efforts of the Developer to create an anchor project which will assist in the City's effort to develop and re- develop an area in the vicinity of the American Bank Center. Section 3. The City hereby further declares its intent and desire to provide whatever assistance, aid, encouragement and support, that is legally authorized, to the Developer to make this project a successful reality. DULY adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City on the of July, 2010. ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS By: By: Armando Chapa, City Secretary Chris Adler, Mayor Pro Tem APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: July 15 , 2010. By: Carlos Valdez, City Attorne` Corpus Christi, Texas of ,2010 The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry R. Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott —314— 3 25 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: July 20. 2010 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance renaming the park located at 1516 Seventh Street, from Oceanview Park to Catalina Martinez Park. ISSUE: The City has established a formal policy for facilities. The City, through the Parks and Recreation Department, received a renaming request from Arturo P. Martinez to rename Oceanview Park to Catalina Martinez Park. BOARD/COMMITTEE REVIEW: The Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee (PRAC) received Arturo P. Martinez's request at their March 10, 2010 meeting, and requested staff begin the 60 day process of due diligence research and public notification. A copy of the Due Diligence Report is included. During the regular PRAC meeting on May 12, 2010, PRAC unanimously voted to recommend Council approve the request to rename Oceanview to Catalina Martinez Park. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: The City Council must approve the naming of all City facilities, parks, and recreation facilities. That process is finalized by the adoption of an ordinance. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the renaming of Oceanview Park to Catalina Martinez Park be approved. • Miclbael Moms, Director Parks and Recreation Department 361-826-3464 M ichael MoCcacctexas. com Attachments: Background Information Renaming Request Due Diligence Report Time line Report Power Point Presentation BACKGROUND INFORMATION Oceanview Park is a 1.07 acre neighborhood park located at 1516 Seventh Street. The park was originally named the same as the sub - division. Similar ordinances have been requested, supported by staff, recommended by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee (PRAC), and approved by the City Council. As per Part II Council Policies, Code of Ordinances: "6. Naming of City parks and recreational facilities. A formal policy for naming of parks and recreation facilities in the City of Corpus Christi is hereby adopted, and the guidelines shall be as follows: A. Donations. Upon donation of at least 51 percent of the value of a park or park facility and upon recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee, the City Council may name the park or park facility as the donating party designates if the park or park facility has not already been specifically named in honor of a person, group, or event. B. Subdivision Dedication. Park land received through dedication under the City's Platting Ordinance shall be named by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee. No formal action needs to be taken by the City Council. C. Name Change. Only the following facilities are eligible to be considered for name changes: (1) park or park facility which is not already named in honor of a person, group, or event; and (2) park or park facility which was named for the subdivision in which it is located. The following definitive steps shall be taken regarding a proposed name change for these eligible parks and park facilities. (1) Persons, groups, or organizations desiring the name change shall complete a request for name change and submit the proposal to the staff of the Parks and Recreation Department for review and consultation with the requesting entity. (2) Name change requests shall be submitted to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee. No action may be taken by the committee fora minimum of 60 days after receipt of the proposal. (3) During the 60 -day waiting period, legal notice shall be published twice in a newspaper of general circulation giving notice of the proposed name change. (4) Written comments are to be submitted to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee and interested individuals are invited to come before the committee to address the issue. (5) At the first meeting after the 60 -day waiting period, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee will take one of the following actions: (a) Approve the request and refer the recommendation to the City Council; (b) Reject the request; or (c) Table the request for future action or additional information. In the event the request is rejected by the committee, the requesting entity may appeal the rejection to the City Council. (6) The Council shall consider the request and either approve or reject the request. The Council, at its option, can waive all provisions herein provided for eligible park and recreation facilities in commemorating or memorializing an individual, group or event. If approved, the Parks and Recreation Department shall arrange suitable renaming ceremonies. Costs associated with renaming ceremonies and the provisions of markers, signs, plaques, or memorials shall be borne by the entity proposing the name change. D. Special Considerations. In choosing names after individuals, consideration may be given to persons living or dead. Special consideration shall be given to the contributions the person has made to the City, State, or Country. A facility or park may not be named after an individual currently in public office or serving as an employee of a local governmental jurisdiction. A one -year waiting period after completion of public office or municipal employment is considered adequate. Names related to religious denominations will generally not be favorably considered unless the rules of donation apply. Input from neighborhood organizations in the immediate vicinity of the park or facility will be sought in the case of a name change request. E. Renaming of Park or Park Facility. The renaming of a park or park facility which is already named in honor of a person, group, or event is not permitted. (Res. No. 21901, § 1, 3 -22 -1994; Res. No. 028430, § 1, 12- 8- 2009)" —318— REQUEST FOR THE NAMING OR RENAMING OF PARKS AND FACILITIES PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CITY OF`COPRUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 1. Type of area or facility (park, building, pool, etc.) 04s r.vi e4w 2. Location :<: _ l5 I +a -7 4. 3. Suggested Name 4orl-A 141 o► VI Y4 ne.z PAY k. Please describe wily you feel this`name to be appropriate. b_y 5. • Name and address of person making request. Name 4-1A ro p. -- PI -,#-; riaz. Address_ 13Oot ore. Si-e,; ,t ' Coyle, c Phone ;,) V8-4 --fCGa Tx ` 7 $404 • 6. Do you represent an organization with respect #o this request? / Ad, ur If 'yes', n m iz tton roQ 1 in em er- L Assay C14� o #7 , '7, Date of this request 10 b u e 3 -.o e,7 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: "st: - Approved - Rejected Tabled Date of Committee Action Date of Council Action Legal Nice - - Newspaper Notice to to Appropriate Councilmember Public Notice -- Neighborhood Attachment to the form: Request for the Naming or Renaming of Parks and Facilities Submitted November 23, 2009 regarding "Catalina Martinez Park ", page l of 2. 4. The new name is appropriate to the history of the park and surrounding neighborhood as well as to its namesake. Catalina Martinez 1923 -2000, resided in the neighborhood for forty years and was an inspiring and hardworking positive force in the community. She is directly responsible for initiating and bringing to- fruition the neighborhood park and the Head Start center, both on 7th Street, to serve the needs of children she observed in the modest income area She served the community in several capacities including forming and leading a highly effective neighborhood association (Spohn Residents Association) and serving as precinct chair for nineteen years (the first Mexican American chair of the precinct). It was while registering voters, that she noticed many children had no yards in which to play and few toys or books at home. She organized neighbors, researched funding, spoke to City and Parks staff, identified an appropriate park site and a lot donor. She made applications and presentations to obtain CDBG funding over several years to cover the cost of additional lots and recreation and play amenities. She interviewed parents, and particularly children, about their wishes for the park. With that information, she and her neighbors collaborated with Parks and Recreation Department staff on the park's design and the selection of equipment the children desired. As a result, the small park serves several age groups with playground equipment, a half basketball court, a picnic table and water fountain. Mrs. Martinez similarly pursued the building of a Head Start, a project she was told would be difficult to accomplish. She was a problem solver who was astute, always beginning with research and questions, and then steadily overcoming obstacles, and gathering the support and resources required. She was known for her intelligence, integrity, diplomatic manner, and tenacity. She was modest about her accomplishments and always shared credit and showed appreciation for the contributions of others. Over the years and particularly since we lost her to Parkinson's, many have suggested the renaming of the park and Head Start center in her name. It is not only to remember her contributions, but to inspire and motivate others to continue her legacy of service and community revitalization, The name of the park after her will have true meaning to the history and residents of our community. Mrs. Martinez earned a degree from Del Mar College. The information offered in response to this renaming form has been limited to her involvement with the park; however, she had other accomplishments as well. Her successful efforts and impact in these and other areas were noted and supported by officials such as Congressman Henry B. Gonzales (former Chairman of the House Banking Committee) and reported on by local radio and TV news outlets, the Caller Times, as well a HUD publication and the McNeil -Leher national public television news program. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Attachment to the form: Request for the Naming or Renaming of Parks and Facilities Submitted November 23, 2009 regarding "Catalina Martinez Park ", page 2of 2. Regarding costs associated with the park name change, it is helpful to note the following: The plaque installed at the original park dedication has been missing for several years. As it is in need of replacement, it is an opportunity to install the replacement plaque with the new park name for no additional cost, The park is a small pocket park, and has only one simple wooden sign bearing its currentname. Regarding the current name of the park, "OceanView ": The park has no view of any water, it is merely the subdivision platting name, which was a default name used for the park at a time when the residents were concentrating on the more important task of acquiring park equipment and funding.: The present name; is a misnomer for this park. November 23, 2009 Parks and Recreation Department 1201 Leopard Street, 3rd Floor City of Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Arturo P. Martinez 1309 Sixth Street Corpus Christi, Texas, 78404 To whom it may concern: This is a letter of consent on behalf of the proposed park " namee ", Catalina Martinez. It has been respectfully requested that the neighborhood park now known as "Oceanview" be renamed to "Catalina Martinez Park ", reflecting the history of the park and community. Catalina Martinez was my beloved wife, who passed away in the year 2000. Her family and community miss her, but we take pleasure in the living legacy she left behind, including the Head Start and the park she and her family and neighbors worked hard to bring to the children of our community. It will be an honor to have the park named after her, and a reminder to our youth of the importance and possibilities of citizen action in our community. We thank the City of Corpus Christi and its officials and staff for their cooperation and support of our neighborhood's efforts. Sincerely, Arturo P. Martinez Due Diligence Report Renaming Oceanview Park to Catalina Martinez Park Staff, Due Diligence Report May 12, 2010 On February 19, 2010, City of Corpus Christi, Parks & Recreation interim Director, Stacie Talbert received a request from Arturo P. Martinez to rename Oceanview Park to Catalina Martinez Park. The Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee received the request at their March 10, 2010 regular meeting. The committee requested staff complete their due diligence report for the May 12, 2010 meeting. Staff research noted the park property had previously been named for the neighborhood subdivision. Additional information showed there is no view of the water from the park. Public notification signs were posted at the park property by April 8, 2010. Notification fliers were mailed to 67 property owners within a two hundred foot radius of the park on March 31, 2010. None were returned as undeliverable. Part of the public notice was an invitation to contact the Parks & Recreation Department with comment, or to attend the Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee meeting on May 12, 2010. Final Public Notice was published in the Caller Times on Sundays, April 25th and May 2"d, 2010. To date, there have been three citizens who do not support the park name change. The record of these telephone conversations is attached. Additionally, the department has collected seven (7) letters and phone messages, with a petition of twenty -seven (27) signatures, totaling thirty -four (34) notifications supporting the requested park name change. Staff Recommendation: Staff supports the request of Arturo P. Martinez to rename Oceanview Park to Catalina Martinez Park. If Council supports this recommendation, Mr. Martinez will be notified of the park sign replacement fee. Stacie Talbert, Interim Director Parks and Recreation (361) 826 -3464 Page 1, Notifications: Park signs posted by April 8, 2010 Neighborhood Fliers Mailed March 31, 2010 The City Corpus Christi, Parks & Recreation Department has received a request to rename Oceanview Park, at 1516 7th St., 78404, to Catalina Martinez Park. This item will be discussed at the Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee meeting May 12, 2010, 5:00 pm, City Hall, 1 201 Leopard Street, Sixth Floor Conference Room. You are invited to attend the meeting, or contact Parks & Recreation at 826 -3463 with your comment or question. Page 2, Notifications: Caller Times Newspaper Publication April 25, 2010 and May 2, 2010 Public Notice: (. )1/4_ l, h h� r�n,iiii<<f Be ye notified in compliance with the City Charter, the Corpus Christi Parks & Recreation Department is considering renaming Oceanview Park, at 1516 7th St, 78404 to Catalina Martinez Park. This item will he discussed at the Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee meeting, May 12, 2010, 5pm, City Hall Sixth Floor Conference Room. You are invited to attend the meeting, or contact Parks & Rec at 826 -3463 with your comment or question. Oceanview Park to CATALINA MARTINEZ PARK Request Timeline Interim Director received request form to name Oceanview Park for Catalina Martinez. Then was requested by family to hold the request until notified. interim Director received husband, Arturo P. Martinez consent letter dated November 23, 2009 to complete request to name Oceanview Park for Catalina Martinez PRAC regular meeting, received Arturo P. Martinez request to name Oceanview Park for Catalina Martinez. PRAC asked staff to solicit public input April 8, 2010 Public notification signs posted at park (PRAC Procedure) March 31, 2010 Notification fliers sent to 67 property owners adjacent to park; 0 retumed. (PRAC Procedure) Public Notification in Caller Times, April 25th & May 2nd (City Ordinance) PRAC regular meeting. > Staff report supports request to rename Oceanview Park for Catalina Martinez > PRAC voted to recommend Catalina Martinez name to City Council, City Ordinance = no Tess than 60 days. 63 process days used. a) > . co .L Q Y co d meline Summary O -a cn N E Q C Q 0 ca Co 2 L N O -0 O o N ca = CO > I ca — -0 M c cmO E c =� o > a O N U F O S N — -0 N O co U. O , i 0 a) E 0 N L 05 ._� O N N _c (-)e 2 -FD _E8 aj o CD ID 0 Q O � �� � cn cn C cn Co .> 0� ��s o CD 73 O �� N � � � � o � � O � � a p O 2 0 M H .O N (75 F2 ■ U Zono_c ( N > rj.>'� co N c U Q - c co co -I--' - 0 a) 13 8 92 0_ �< 0 = H > LL CO L. 2. 0 c 2 • A A A A A c 0 ca 0) vJ _ Q ca N L _ - O N E O L ca c) c O c ca N .0) Q -o > .c O = 8 'Ef 0 m -0 CO 0 0 O CD 0 O C c6 }, +� o O O •= N 0) L O_c = >'cf) N CO 0 O O C O • �� E N E • O� — 09 E -a Q ,_ co O cn 0 >c J 0_ -0 O CO A A A A r I. > Founding member of Spohn Residents Association 0 \ Q co U .0 co Q cn c co ca � U .x ((• 13 LL nc Catalina Martinez was often seen in the Caller Times promoting neighborhood efforts. Page 1 of 2 ORDINANCE RENAMING THE PARK LOCATED AT 1516 SEVENTH STREET, FROM OCEANVIEW PARK TO CATALINA MARTINEZ PARK, WHEREAS, there is an approximately 1.07 acre park area located 1516 Seventh Street; WHEREAS, on November 23, 2009, the City received a request from Arturo P. Martinez to rename this park, Catalina Martinez Park; WHEREAS, the Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee ( "PRAC ") considered this request at their March 10, 2010 meeting at which time they requested staff begin their due diligence research and began the 60 day process of public notification; WHEREAS, notice was posted at the park on April 8, 2010 with legal notice about the proposed name change posted in the Corpus Christi Caller Times on April 25, 2010 and May 2, 2010; WHEREAS, the PRAC considered and by unanimous vote, recommended the Oceanview Park name change to City Council at their May 12, 2010 meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The name of the park located at 1516 Seventh Street, is hereby renamed from Oceanview Park to Catalina Martinez Park. Page 2 of 2 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame Priscilla G. Leal Chris N. Adler John E. Marez Brent Chesney Nelda Martinez Larry Elizondo, Sr. Mark Scott Kevin Kieschnick That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2010, by the following vote: Joe Adame Priscilla G. Leal Chris N. Adler John E. Marez Brent Chesney Nelda Martinez Larry Elizondo, Sr. Mark Scott Kevin Kieschnick PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2010. ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary APPROVED as to form: By: Lisa Aguilar Assistant City Attorney Joe Adame Mayor 26 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: July 20, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: A. Summary of the Results of Privatization and Outsourcing, Reorganization, and Operational & Management Practices Initiative — Phase 1. (TABLED ON 07/06/10) B. ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $175,000.00 FROM THE UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE IN THE GENERAL FUND NO. 1020 FOR PRIVATIZATION & OUTSOURCING SERVICES — PHASE 2; CHANGING THE FY 2009 -2010 OPERATING BUDGET ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 028252 B Y INCREASING EXPENDITURES IN THE GENERAL FUND NO. 1020 BY $175,000.00; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (TABLED ON 07/06/10) C. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate a service agreement (OPTION 1) with Crowe Horwath LLP of Irving, TX, for an amount not to exceed $175,000, to provide for the quantifying of projected dollar amounts of cost - saving/revenue enhancing initiatives, and for other related services ( "Phase 2 ") concerning the privatizing and outsourcing of certain • portions of the City's municipal government functions. The term of the service agreement will extend through the date Crowe Horwath presents its results to City Council. Funding is to be appropriated in the General Fund in FY 09 -10. (TABLED ON 07/06/10) D. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to select one to five Privatization & Outsourcing initiatives (OPTION2) and to negotiate a service agreement with Crowe Horwath LLP of Irving, TX, for an amount commensurate with the one to five Privatization & Outsourcing initiatives selected by the City Manager or his designee, to provide for the quantifying of projected dollar amounts of cost - saving/revenue enhancing initiatives, and for other related services ( "Phase 2 ") concerning the privatizing and outsourcing of certain portions of the City's municipal government functions. The City Manager's selections and the negotiated service agreement will be presented to City Council for final approval prior to implementation of Phase 2. The term of the service agreement will extend through the date Crowe Horwath presents its results to City Council. (TABLED ON 07/06/10) E. Motion authorizing the City Council's Administration Committee to select one to five Privatization & Outsourcing initiatives (OPTION 3) and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate a service agreement with Crowe Horwath LLP of Irving, TX, for an amount commensurate with the one to five Outsourcing & Privatization initiatives selected by the City Council's Administration Committee, to provide for the quantifying of projected dollar amounts of cost - saving/revenue enhancing initiatives, and for other related services ( "Phase 2 ") concerning the privatizing & outsourcing of certain portions of the City' s municipal government functions. The City Council's Administration Committee's selections and the corresponding service agreement negotiated by staff will be presented to City Council for final approval prior to implementation of Phase 2. The term of the service agreement will extend through the date Crowe Horwath presents its results to City Council. (TABLED ON 07/06/10) ISSUE: The City of Corpus Christi's (City) revenues have decreased in correlation to the general downturn in our nation' s economy. As a result, the City experienced a $6 million budget shortfall in its General Fund in FY 09 -10 and currently anticipates a $16 million, $18 million and $21.3 million General —335— Fund budget shortfall in FY 10 -11, FY 11 -12 and FY 12 -13, respectively. Thus, the City is seeking to improve efficiencies, reduce costs and maximize revenues realized through its operations by restructuring, outsourcing and privatizing certain functions currently performed by the City. HISTORY: In April of this year, the City issued a Request for Information (RFI). A committee comprised of the Assistant City Manager for Public Works, Interim Assistant City Manager for Administrative Services, Assistant Director of Management & Budget, Assistant Director of Financial Services and the City's Procurement Manager conducted interviews of the five firms that expressed interest and carefully evaluated each firm's response. The committee determined that Crowe Horwath LLP (Crowe) represented the best overall value to the City. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: On April 20, 2010, City Council authorized the City Manager to execute a service agreement with Crowe Horwath LLP of Irving, TX, for $78,370, to provide for an initial assessment, and for other related services ( "Phase 1 ") concerning the restructuring, outsourcing and privatizing of certain portions of the City's municipal government functions. The term of the agreement extended through the date Crowe was to present the initial assessment to City Council (July 6, 2010). On July 6, 2010, City Council deliberated staffs recommendation to approve ten Primary and six Alternate initiatives out of forty -one prospective Privatization & Outsourcing, Reorganization and Operational & Management Practices initiatives. City Council tabled action until July 20, 2010. BACKGROUND OF PHASE is Crowe Horwath LLP (Crowe) has completed Phase 1 of the restructuring, outsourcing and privatization initiative. Crowe reviewed the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, organizational structure, Capital Improvement Program and Debt Structure to obtain an understanding of the City's financial condition. Crowe also interviewed department directors and many assistant directors and division managers and other key stakeholders to gain an understanding of the issues that are critical to the community and the City. This initial assessment (Phase 1) has resulted in the identification of forty -one potential initiatives whereby cost savings /revenue enhancement may be realized. Twenty of these potential initiatives focus on Privatization and Outsourcing, ten on Reorganization and eleven on Operational & Management Practices (see Crowe Horwath's attached Executive Summary). CURRENT ISSUE: The attached Executive Summary, including the Heat Map, Bubble Chart and Road Map, provide a summary of Crowe's findings resulting from Phase 1. The Heat Map correlates each of the forty -one initiatives with the business drivers that may affect the success of each initiative. The Heat Map also ranks each initiative based on financial, service and implementation benefits. Of the twenty -one prospective initiatives listed under the Reorganization and Operational & —336— Management Practices section of the Heat Map, City staff has already addressed: Procurement Shared Services, Expense Benchmarking for Spend Reduction, Increase User Fees Study and Improve Collections — Reduce Bad Debt Expense, resulting in a total projected cost savings /revenue enhancement of $2,478,778 that is factored into the FY 10 -11 budget. The Bubble Chart reflects the Heat Map score and the expected time frame for implementation of the twenty privatization & outsourcing initiatives. Strategic importance is listed on the x -axis and time on the y -axis. The Bubble Chart helps in the visualization of the prioritization of the twenty privatization & outsourcing initiatives. Those privatization & outsourcing initiatives that fall in Quadrant I of the Bubble Chart have a high heat score which means each has been identified as a project that has the potential for having significant budgetary impact in a short amount of time. Initiatives lying in Quadrant II also have high heat scores, but will take a longer period of time to realize than those in Quadrant I. Items in Quadrants III and IV have lower heat scores. Quadrant III contains projects that can be realized in a relatively short period of time, while those in Quadrant IV are long -term initiatives. The Roadmap Timeline shows the potential timeline for implementation of each of the twenty privatization & outsourcing initiatives necessary to realize cost savings/revenue enhancement, based on the complexity and size of the initiative. PRIVATIZATION & OUTSOURCING With respect to Privatization & Outsourcing initiatives, Phase 2 will consist of Crowe conducting a narrow and deep analysis of selected Privatization & Outsourcing initiatives identified during the broad and wide inter- departmental analysis conducted in Phase I. This will be accomplished by Crowe engaging in detailed conversations with key stakeholders and identifying a resource plan and constraints specific to each selected initiative. Additionally, for each Privatization & Outsourcing initiative selected, Crowe will: develop a specific approach that will meet the City's goals and objectives, identify costs of implementing each initiative, create implementation time frames specific to each and project a detailed savings and return on investment analysis that will provide specific projected savings that may be expected to be realized from each. Solely with respect to Privatization & Outsourcing initiatives, Phase 2 will take approximately four months for Crowe to complete. In order for Crowe to progress to Phase 2, Staff presents the following options: OPTION 1 Crowe will pursue the nine Privatization & Outsourcing initiatives in Quadrants I and II of the Bubble Chart, those being (from left to right on the Bubble Chart): Initiative Number Initiative Description 10 Parking Operations — Meters/Towing 4 Street Maintenance 7 Fleet/Motor Pool 18 Building Maintenance (including custodial) 2 Solid Waste: Landfill/Disposal/Transfer 9 EMS /Ambulance Services 19 Grounds Maintenance (Mowing, Landscaping) 1 Solid Waste: Collection (Refuse & Brush) 11 Accounting & Financial Services -337- The cost associated with Option 1 is a not -to- exceed amount of $ 175,000. OPTION 2 Staff will select one to five of the Privatization & Outsourcing initiatives enumerated in Option 1 above and obtain City Council' s approval of same. Crowe will then see these one to five initiatives through to completion of Phase 2. The anticipated cost and time to completion will be negotiated between staff and Crowe and will be provided to City Council, in the form of a written service agreement, upon presentation of the recommended initiatives to City Council by staff. OPTION 3 The City Council's Administration Committee will review, evaluate and select one to five of the Privatization & Outsourcing initiatives enumerated in Option 1 above. The recommended one to five initiatives will then be presented to the City Council as -a -whole for review and final approval. Crowe will then see these one to five initiatives through to completion of Phase 2. The anticipated cost and time to completion will be negotiated between staff and Crowe and will be provided to City Council in the form of a written service agreement, upon presentation of the recommended initiatives to City Council. Vetting the prospective Privatization & Outsourcing initiatives through the Administration Committee is strongly encouraged by both staff and Crowe as it will provide a venue conducive to the consideration and deliberation necessary in such a selection process. It will also provide staff and Crowe with much - needed guidance that will be essential to moving the recommended Privatization & Outsourcing initiatives through to Phase 2. REORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONAL & MANAGEMENT PRACTICES With respect to Reorganization and Operational & Management Practices, during the course of FY 10 -11, staff will review and evaluate the Reorganization and Operational & Management Practices initiatives identified by Crowe in Phase 1. Staff will provide the results of this review and evaluation and related reconunendations to City Council in order to obtain feedback and direction that will be essential to the proper identification and successful implementation of such initiatives. Staff will aggressively seek to implement those cost-saving/revenue enhancing initiatives that may be quickly implemented. Moreover, because no additional cost will be associated with staff analyzing and implementing these prospective initiatives, the potential cost of Phase 3 will be significantly reduced. FUTURE COUNCIL ACTION: Staff and Crowe will report the findings of Phase 2 to City Council on or about December 14, 2010. At that time, City Council may choose to carry out Phase 3, which will consist of Crowe guiding implementation of the recommended Privatization & Outsourcing initiatives. The complexity and size of implementing the recommended initiatives will be determined during Phase 2 and will drive the cost associated with Phase 3. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that City Council approve Privatization & Outsourcing Option 3 above. -338- Cindy O'Bri�rf Interim Assistant City Manager Administrative Services e -mail: CindvO @cctexas.com phone: (361) 826 -3217 " � s Pa . /r fierce Procurement Manager e -mail: paul p @cctexas.com phone: (361) 826 -3164 0/firc 7-1? Oscar Martinez Assistant City Manager Public Works e -mail: OscarM@cctexas.com phone: (361) 826 -3897 1 Ta 2 L m _ m Tii- 3 31 = 3 _ la M 0) 1 X _ m W U. s • V = G) _ E.0 In 3 E 00 .- � in �~ CL aMM ea a o City of Corpus Christi, Texas E E c 0 U a D co -0 2 O c▪ o c 0 ▪ z Executive Bubble Chart cu c cu E a co E -o co 0 oC c O co c N E N a E Current Successes al 0 0 15 0 s % x as s o) 0- ✓ o 4J fG c o v rs co _c 0 o. a° z 1 ,i N (D N N ✓ L (J) cn 0 r0 r0 O a a 0 L 0. w L w Business L 4J ti Q) ro 4J U) C a) E — c • (o a) Q 2 U O Qa) a) N L > > U C a) .( 'L >\ p _c L O_ U cn — L) 167) CO U cn O CO (3 (a C 167) c a) (s 0, i .O • U >1 .0 mac V 4.+ W V V cu mc: o .N • = w • 0 O ._ ao Q �- . L 0 C a) a) U C (a C Q) a) C Q) Q) L -o co0 0 co ▪ L cn - U 0 U 0 cn c 4J 0 a0 co cn (o > Q) (1) - 4J I- O into three areas: The initiatives are D The heat map is sorted by the "heat score" or potential impact of each initiative 41 Initiatives Evaluated for the City of Corpus Christi to C a) W a) 0 I C >� C Q 0 0 o �i (0 0) (D 4-, X +� .4., i L n c 3 to co to a) Z3 N'. O 0 a-+ € L In w a �, C L m to n US C>_ olL L Ui'.''..'.' -C3 L a) Q . Q', 0 C cn c L- N� U -p' C 0 .�.., 0 .4 , >, �' r a) d _ a) (0 N _O 4xx 34 0 (1) N O 4.-1 C N p 0 Q ('n U fo Q X a) a 0 �-, to _ O (0 (/) T3 U 0 E a a xr ( c -0 0 -0 ul a) (n a-) 0 a) (n c > a) w a) �' a (aa)) 0_ 0 t0 L r (0 L n3 v) _c :r._, Iii D 'O to C �, In a) u E c' a) c c c D 0. 0 0. o c' Z a) L u 2 a U a) (0 0 ro (r)' CD 0 Q 0 n - esources O N (0 �t o- -J _ c �J o c 4- — 0 0 (i) >. (3 vl ce O .4-' 4 ) .Ln (r) � 4—' L,',--z cr.) w �3 70 "0 .0 C'4 — (13 (,)' Maintenance c c o (0 (, E C a) -0 c a) a Q c (f)' L X O' W Fuel Hedging c) 4-) a) c 4-) a) 0 ncrease 4-, E c (0 z (n Q Er) L 0 0 0. O i--1 1-1' rn 1 ,- w (n ,--1 C U) L V to L 4-) L RS 1 a) O N w 0 Z U E U((P1 \ (0 < c tuj E_ 1- (0 — a) C ZL (0 (3 0 IL < LLJ a - I=1 CM CM El MEI 3:1 Ci CM El El 171] WE U 11:1 El CI KU WE \ W 4 L c •L (a O (A o U, N (a N L V _ V � O O O O � ', v° U E L �s _ � � o 167) �' o = fl. U -6-) Q L � i Al 01 Mi .6_,/�''�U, c0 _a� (n=o .°_ C V �, .— V v minj o (n O w _ ca) co O (n N (a (a v • '1.0 O O s in w O V V� v O a (n a--� N a--� N O m E L \ 0) �v o� �• N >- O ca = W= 2 N ca �, O O- (� = o w Paz o_ co o> cc) ro Cllo(0 _' +4 ��� N � NO Pi co -C . O O a--' T� �, = _ ■— r cs) C s o .0 CO .L -5 c a�ro �O3 Ha. o =o� ._ W — — — .�= VII) L a--, cn Q) , `s • — 0 (0 _0 a--i - o s co •— a�5 Q) c Q� Q) Qu Q) a--) > , " 3 _c co _o �L_ .0 L�° 0 G t s u 0 m O woos dew loaH MNIPMN -. cv fn vr () c O Q) .6J 167) 0 ti- O E I Q) no O L _c — -0 167, C U I OQ) N l O - CD (0 i -0" 4-, C CU N � •L ca Q) -o• p — N L c Q) - o .- o_ 4-, c Q) Q) _• � L c U Q) Q), (a a- J O u) cn Q) 11! Q) E' ,c L) -0 N N N ocu EEC a)� Q) O Q) O c Q) v assessment. L cii o _ .Ld 4+ V ._ CU w t 1 1. 4.1 O..2 o N 4./(1) 4J am E_ 0 E H O V E 4-+ w/ a% ow saga ro (a t!1 a••' i•"=i c ro t � c Q) L • L a--� O� c ro Li) LE i r co 7;3 1 (0 i Ln Q) U 11-i , (/) O ro L Q 1 Q) U cn Consolidate Forms Purchases cn a) Q cn a) U O O L 0 D c Q) CO > - L L (1) 4J Q O E o Q gsz Fire & Police — ca (a a) cri O a) 0 Ln 0 > 'c O cri U — >` O a) Q U L -C (1) U) O a) O O O ._ O) Q O Ln -0 L Q cri c U '._ L a--, U () L 0) COCa) a)� o oa)C C Ln D O •— L a) cn E O U U '� �' 4-,., m oa) (1)c.6_, N� U W Q > N �, > Vi cn O Ln a) 2 2 N -c a) ca c _c �QOL ,-6-' 0'E,a_c a,C L O a--i U c U�����c a) To U Uroa)�a Q_ =ao°'�s_� ��'�����5E O : L (0 a) 4_, > U U (n (1) (n (n O a) W U O > W c O - W O CC W W � � O d O Hi 0 ., O `w Z O E 10 Om oL c �Y Q To O V O . O W ., m 0 oa � =v gv V � eE O m • ^ W O O .5 _ WE ilm O m CL L � � W 0 0 L 0 0 ro 0 (i) c 0 > 167J .47J (3 (3 cu 167J L � ._ Start broad - and -wide in ementation E H Assessment ca ro 0 0 (a -o (13 ro c > >. .- `~ (- a--' N i 1 U a) (a > a) O - 6 4— C CO .> a) U Q) A o� L O Q Q -0 • Q >- 0 r - ozo .7J 0 E 1 Transition U L n1`'.'. 0 v' v >s 1-1 0 E `N (a - M 0 +' v �+ (n 0) C ` 0 cri N V tn N O = v O C v C 6N 0. ca � �C ! Q L ,Ei a1 �C C (a Cen L To A▪ L' " T v ' " ° • v v v 0 o ,� ( © ivy) U v .1..0 n cn C c Q 0 Q co C 0 L a+ v\ '3 1.+ U L ..7 v - ow).- i a) L Q v c N I C J n ( 0 L C oz G v ro .d L — J L 4-0 ` O (.) E L n V v c L. 0 CL> � vo 0 �-cn � co L N v cL° J ,� N v: + Ln ...c EL .611 CI L.I.J. -C.0)(1) ",75 (0(1)>, : 0 .L U ■ ■ < i iii :� < U • ■ 1 ■ ■ (O v C V 0 c Ln .4-4_ 1_, O VI •V `'3 v C1) ftl N 0 C' t!i ▪ _ O 0' 0 0 "0 +� Q) >. N -C L �.+ O `emu^ 0 v Q) CO cyi 0 0) 4 C O Cn Q—' o Q I 4a C � 5 W a) a--+ O v Q U a)� N 03 C ▪ C V a r C .CE C Cr LL W - C 01 CU IT 16- 0 = .5 01 amp can s_ L v a) Q? L c� v' — " co • v d > •L Z7 , O_ = a) 1:3 .L7.. � > C)_ rts ca v ca ' E , cv C73 m - 0 U • O OL ca v 0 V ,� L to 77 ._ cn C a--� .l-J •> v 0 �'� ca ai� E 0- .-P13 > L O Ql 0) ' Q v c -`'' '-' L a. E 3 0 ▪ 0. = % v % v • Cr) cn vy' 's 0 _ O L 1(1 19 C 13 .I.J 13 0. CO v ca ▪ .� R3 °10 v " co t .1.d ) : v(i)u• a)covo uov cn -C •y cn E cn C > 7) cn O d-- L O O C L C O (3) _c �'� rts v,v_c 4— 0 I—' co I— c.) U) > 1- • ro ca >' .1-+ .fl ss • o v >. :7,: ▪ C p - > cna)LC 0E oca= E fv , cv La) vL ro 4J -4.$ ▪ C c L. ✓ % O L) ▪ c o O a) a) ,�;" E sa l' ID ▪ r _c .. O c3 O a� v 4— (0 cn >` ._ 4-, - c t0 - : C r ,. va a) c(0 v C i 2 0 c L v CO •7) UI v O v c (0 O L O v (fv R C L —.> v L a) = > L > (0 ..J> a L 0 (Ca (0 O L- > v N �.n D I— c O . 2.• w G7 fl.0 CI >.L' p E m O O y' G. 1.1 a Z ! W (if) v 0 v C a) �7 O c _ N U 03 - A a) = ▪ ( t CO (A 4-' L. > (D a) ▪ o � � Oa 0 4' ' .V a (0 a) >. D ( V = L) > (a 4 U L31 Q c 6 U 01 >▪ E O cA cn > c ----.— a):,� c�i C •76j (.r � U N a) a) C - +�-" C v 4-, (DO U '''N o C rn 'v • v +,.7 a) (I) c 7. N 2J c ij - RI ° c a "> 5_ c V c71 2 ,4-; r, ° _cul (I) -47., a) a) (p (A N_ 01 Off.+ L 'O t: a .l-) co - a�-7 a) ca a) O c (L a) no `f L >..� a) (t) ._ > 6- a-+ N V a) �_ a) �7 L O a) O a) E d o a) O a_+ Q L .LID c�.L (Q, • a) V a) L ▪ 6, C'� E L ct E L 'a) cn▪ '.c' a) (o a) E a) c E V 9- E .X C31 V) +- •7 O c _ • TO > L v L N L a) 0 4_7 a-•7 O >�'0 c '0 0 N cn c 71 c rra C I- 'C) (A rZ 'O - to a) c (a cn 4_ a) > a) a) vi a) v a) E a) L .L) f4 a) O X (Q c fLU L 0. U (O >. (A a) a3 4-4 ' E _czt .0 N L _ >` a) U a) 4.7, '._ -0 E a-7 ro a) - a:.7 - aa)) [ . -� II L_ G V �E • C 3 tQ �3 0 .... O. 'yy Q C .V fl. to 4- 2NDG QWw U' L' CO a) U) Q) L' (3 00 N t Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $175,000.00 FROM THE UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE IN THE GENERAL FUND NO. 1020 FOR PRIVATIZATION & OUTSOURCING SERVICES — PHASE 2; CHANGING THE FY 2009 -2010 OPERATING BUDGET ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 028252 BY INCREASING EXPENDITURES IN THE GENERAL FUND NO. 1020 BY $175,000.00; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That $175,000.00 is appropriated from the unreserved fund balance in the General Fund No. 1020 for privatization & outsourcing services — Phase 2; changing the FY 2009 -2010 Operating budget adopted by Ordinance No. 028252 by increasing expenditures in the General Fund No. 1020 by $175,000.00. SECTION 2. That upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure this the day of , 2010. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Armando Chapa Joe Adame City Secretary Mayor Approved: July 15, 2010 Ge.„4- Lisa Aguil , Assistant City Attorney for the City Attorney —403— Corpus Christi, Texas Day of ,2010 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings: Ilwe, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council, Respectfully, Respectfully, Joe Adame Mayor Council Members The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla G. Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott Related to item 26 SERVICE AGREEMENT No. SA 10 -048 THIS RESTRUCTURING, OUTSOURCING & PRIVATIZATION CONSULTING SERVICES CONTRACT (this "Agreement ") is entered into by and between Crowe Horwath LLP (the "Consultant ") and the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation (the "City ") effective for all purposes upon execution by the City Manager. WHEREAS Consultant has proposed to provide RESTRUCTURING, OUTSOURCING & PRIVATIZATION CONSULTING SERVICES; WHEREAS the City has determined Consultant to be the most advantageous Respondent; NOW, THEREFORE, Consultant and City enter into this Agreement and agree as follows: 1. Services. Consultant will provide the RESTRUCTURING, OUTSOURCING & PRIVATIZATION CONSULTING SERVICES in accordance with Phase 2 in Exhibit B. 2. Fee for Services. The City agrees to pay the Contractor those fees mutually agreed to between both parties as follows: an amount not to exceed $ 175,000 for Phase 2 as described in Exhibit B, to include a formal written report presented, in person by Contractor, to the Corpus Christi City Council. Contractor shall bill the City, by the fifteenth calendar day of each month, for services provided during the preceding calendar month. Terms are net 30 days of City's receipt of a valid invoice. 3. Term. The term of this Agreement, as Phase 2 is described in Exhibit B, shall commence on the date this Agreement is signed by the last signatory hereto and shall continue through the date the Phase 2 written report is presented to City Council by the Contractor on or about November 9, 2010. 4. Contract Administrator. The City will provide active and supportive functional area leadership to answer questions, participate in meetings, and support analysis work through personal and team supported assistance. The Contract Administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this Agreement including authorizations for payment. The Contract Administrator will review and approve deliverable documents within one business day. If deliverable documents are not acceptable, the City will provide information on what is needed to satisfy expectations within 5 business days of receipt of deliverables. Under the guidance of the Contract Administrator, Consultant will obtain information and insight from the Steering Committee team. The City will provide an internal scheduler / project support person who will coordinate stakeholders' calendars, setup meetings, and manage communication with the appropriate Consultant contact. The City will make the Contract Administrator, Steering Committee, and other desired resources available for a weekly call to evaluate progress, discuss current issues, and discuss upcoming activities. All of Consultant's notices or communications regarding this Agreement must be directed to the Contract Administrator, who is the Assistant City Manager - Administration. 5. Independent Contractor. Consultant will perform the services hereunder as an independent contractor and will furnish such services in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances or conditions may any agent, servant, or employee of Consultant be considered as an employee of the City. 6. Insurance. Before activities can begin under this Agreement, Consultant's insurance company(ies) must deliver a Certificate of Insurance, as proof of the required insurance coverages to the Contract Administrator. Additionally, the certificate must state that the Contract Administrator will be given 30 days' notice of cancellation, material change in the coverages, or intent not to renew any of the policies by certified mail. The City must be named as an Additional Insured. The City Attorney must be given copies of all insurance policies within 15 days of the City Manager's written request. Insurance requirements are incorporated herein in Exhibit A, which is incorporated herein by reference, and may be revised annually by the City Manager upon 30 days written notice to Consultant. 7. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement or any right or interest therein by Consultant is effective unless the City first gives its written consent to such assignment. The performance of this Agreement by Consultant is of the essence of this Agreement and the City's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City on any ground whatsoever. 8. Fiscal Year. All parties recognize that the continuation of any contract after the close of any fiscal year of the City, which fiscal year ends on July 31 annually, is subject to appropriations and budget approval providing for such contract item as an expenditure in that budget. The City does not represent that the budget item will be actually adopted, that determination is within the sole discretion of the City Council at the time of adoption of each budget. 9. Waiver. No waiver of any breach of any terra or condition of this Agreement or Consultant's response waives any subsequent breach of the same. 10. Compliance with Laws. This Agreement is subject to all Federal laws and laws of the State of Texas. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of Texas and venue for all disputes under this Agreement lies exclusively in Nueces County, Texas. 11, Subcontractors. Consultant may use subcontractors in connection with the work performed under this Agreement. When using subcontractors, however, Consultant must obtain prior written approval from the Contract Administrator. In using subcontractors, Consultant is responsible for all their acts and omissions to the same extent as if the subcontractor and its employees were employees of Consultant. All requirements set forth as part of this Agreement are applicable to all subcontractors and their employees to the same extent as if the Consultant and its employees had performed the services. 12. Employee Litigation. In any and all claims against any party indemnified hereunder by any employee of Consultant, any subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of there may be liable, the indemnification obligation herein provided shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages, compensation or benefits payable by or for Consultant or any subcontractor under workers' compensation or other employee benefit acts. 13. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended only by written agreement signed by duly authorized representatives of the parties hereto. 14. Termination. The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Consultant's failure to perform the services specified herein. Failure to keep all insurance policies in force for the entire term of this Agreement is grounds for termination. The Contract Administrator must give Consultant 5 work -days written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Consultant has not cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. Alternatively, City may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, upon 20 days' written notice to Consultant. However, City may terminate this Agreement on 24 -hours written notice to Consultant for failure to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes as set out herein. 15. Taxes. Consultant covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment taxes, and all other related taxes according to Circular E Employer's Tax Guide, publication 15, as it may be amended. Consultant must provide proof of payment of these taxes within 30 days after City Manager's written request therefore. Failure to pay or provide proof of payment is grounds for the City Manager to immediately terminate this Agreement. 16. Drug Policy. Consultant must adopt a Drug Free Workplace and drug testing policy that substantially conforms to the City's policy. The City has a zero- tolerance drug policy. * 17. Violence Policy. Consultant must adopt a Violence in the Workplace and related hiring policy that substantially conforms to the City's policy. The City has a zero- tolerance violence policy. 18. Notice. Notice may be given by fax, hand delivery or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is deemed received on the day faxed or hand - delivered or on the third day after deposit, if sent certified mail. Notice shall be sent as follows: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Attention: Assistant City Manager - Administration P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469 -9277 Fax No.: 361 - 882 -7320 IF TO CONSULTANT: Consultant's Contact Person: Address: City, State, Zip: Fax No.: Crowe Horwath LLP Kevin W. Smith 5215 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 200 Irving 800 - 599 -9114 TX 75039 -3732 19. Month -to -Month Extension. If the City has not completed the procurement process and awarded a new RESTRUCTURING, OUTSOURCING & PRIVATIZATION CONSULTING SERVICES contract upon the expiration of this Agreement, then Consultant must continue to provide services under this Agreement, at its current fee, on a month-to-month basis until a new contract is awarded by Council. This Agreement automatically expires on the effective date of a new contract; the Contract Administrator will provide written notice of the effective date of the new contract to Consultant. 20. Indemnification. CONSULTANT AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS (INDEMNITEES) FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF ANY NATURE ON ACCOUNT OF DEATH, PERSONAL INJURIES, TANGIBLE PROPERTY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES WHICH ARISE OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS CONTRACT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS CONTRACT, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE INJURIES, DEATH OR TANGIBLE PROPERTY DAMAGES ARE CAUSED OR ARE CLAIMED TO BE CAUSED BY THE CONCURRENT OR CONTRIBUTING NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES, BUT NOT BY THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES UNMIXED WITH THE FAULT OF ANY OTHER PERSON OR GROUP. CONSULTANT MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, INVESTIGATE ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO INDEMNITEES AND PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEY AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND .EXPENSES OF ANY HIND ARISING FROM ANY OF SAID LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS OR ACTIONS. 21. Severability. Each provision of the Agreement shall be considered to be severable and, if, for any reason, any such provision or any part thereof, is determined to be invalid and contrary to any existing or future applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of or affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, but this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part thereof had been omitted. 22. Acceptance of Document Deliverables. For Deliverables that are requirements, specifications, test plans, designs, or other documents, whether electronic or paper (collectively, "Document Deliverables "), City shall review and approve such Document Deliverables in a tirneframe mutually agreeable to City and Consultant, but City's review shall occur consistent with the project schedule. This applies only to Document Deliverables. If City does not provide written notice of rejection of the Document Deliverable by the mutually agreed upon timefrarne, the Document Deliverable shall be deemed accepted. The Phase 1 deliverable will be a presentation in a Microsoft PowerPoint format with supporting documents determined between Consultant and the City. SIGNED this day of 1-"vi CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI ,20IO Consultant: Crowe Horwath LLP G- nn I•I- l��,y- Sign 4}ure Nam John M.1- lurlburt Title: Principal Angel R. Escobar Date City Manager C. In the event of accidents of any kind, the Consultant must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accident within ten (10) days of the accident. D. Consultant must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company in accordance with Texas law. The contract for coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The coverage provided must be in amounts sufficient to assure that all workers' compensation obligations incurred will be promptly met. E. Consultant's financial integrity is of interest to the City; therefore, subject to Consultants right to maintain reasonable deductibles in such amounts as are approved by the City, Consultant shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Consultant's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- (VII). F The City shall be entitled, upon request and without expense, to receive copies of the policies, declarations page and all endorsements thereto as they apply to the limits required by the City, and may require the deletion, revision, or modification of particular policy terms, conditions, limitations or exclusions (except where policy provisions are established by law or regulation binding upon either of the parties hereto or the underwriter of any such policies). Consultant shall be required to comply with any such requests and shall submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Consultant shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Management P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469 -9277 (361) 826 -4555 - Fax # G. Consultant agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • Name the City and its officers, officials, employees, volunteers, and elected representatives as additional insured by endorsement, as respects operations and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation and professional liability polices; • Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and • Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation, non - renewal or material change in coverage, and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. H. Within five (5) calendar days of a suspension, cancellation, or non- renewal of coverage, Successful Bidder shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Consultant's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Consultant's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Consultant to stop work hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Consultant hereunder until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. J. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Consultant's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this agreement. K. It is agreed that Consultant's insurance shall be deemed primary and non- contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this contract. L. It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this contract. 2010 Restructuring & Privatization consultant ins. req. 2 -25 -10 p Risk Management EXHIBIT B Cost Savings / Revenue Enhancing Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) for the City of Corpus Christi, Texas March 19, 2010 Submitt-3d to; Mr. Paul Pierce Procurement Manager City of Corpus Christi P.O. Box 9277 Zip 78469 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Suhmittod Mr. Kevin W. Smith, Partner Crowe Horwath LLP 5215 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 200 Irving, Texas 75039-3732 Direct (972) 868-9056 Tel 972.868.9055 Fax 800.599.9114 kevin.w.smith@crowehorwath.com Crowe Horwath Crowe Horwath. Crowe Horwath LLP Independent Member Crow Frorwalh Internationsf March 19, 2010 Mr. Paul Pierce Procurement Manager City of Corpus Christi P.O. Box 9277 Zip 78469 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Dear Mr. Pierce 5215 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 200 Irving, Texas 75039 -3732 Tel 972- 80t1.0055 Fax 800.599.9114 swm crowehorwath.com Thank you for the opportunity to introduce Crowe Rorwath LLP ( "Crowe ") to the City of Corpus Christi ( "City ") and present our qualifications and approach to the City's Request for Information ( "RFI ") for a Restructuring and Privatization Study. We appreciated hearing from the City's management team about the challenge of maintaining quality services in the face of revenue shortfalls and believe that we understand your needs and goals related to this important project. We believe that Crowe is the right choice for the City to partner with based upon our extensive experience with similar projects at both the state and local levels of government. As requested, we are pleased to present our price proposal as well as additional information on our approach to, and the timing of, deliverables using an industry- proven methodology. We will value the City as an important client and will provide high quality service, aimed at exceeding your expectations on both a short -term and long -term basis. A few distinguishing characteristics of Crowe and our proposal include: Your desire to partner with a firm who can complement your existing expertise and "add value" beyond ideas and opportunities that you have already identified or pre - conceived "canned" outsourcing solutions. We have assembled a group of professionals who focus their efforts in serving the unique needs of governments. Our specialization has allowed us to develop personnel who are familiar with the financial, political, social, and economic trends influencing the City. Our Public Sector Services (PSS) group is comprised of more than 125 individuals, and serves nearly 200 governmental organizations nationwide. Our client relationships have repeatedly shown that we are a trusted advisor. A firm that genuinely appreciates management's objective to, "provide the highest level of service at the most competitive price." Our PSS Group includes several former government officials — both appointed and elected — who can leverage their years of experience to produce a study that meets the expectations of both the City's management and elected officials. In addition to the proposed members that met with City management on March 17, 2010 we are including Ann Lathrop, former City Controller for Indianapolis and current Crowe Executive. Among Ann's many accomplishments with the City of Indianapolis, including her leadership of cost savings initiatives resulting in over $105 million in savings for the Airport, $65 million in savings at the Wastewater Treatment Plant, and $26 million in savings based on IT outsourcing activities. The emphasis we place on meeting and exceeding client expectations and providing excellent client service because our team has real life experiences balancing budgets and creating efficiencies. Our expertise was gained not just as outside auditors and consultants but also as elected and appointed public officials answering to constituents on the front line. 1 Mr. Paul Pierce, Procurement Manager City of Corpus Christi Page 2 Approach Crowe understands that attaining revenue maximization, cost savings and improved service delivery is the ultimate goal of the first phase of this project. We anticipate that many ideas will face political, constituent, and employee pressure, therefore we will develop a comprehensive communications plan to manage the messages to the various stakeholders. We also recognize the time constraints and agree with the general approach suggested by the City to identify from the "50,000 foot view" opportunities that are ready for further analysis in the first phase, and then a more detailed project planning and implementation phase that can incorporate savings either before the FY 2011 budget is adopted or shortly thereafter in a modified budget. To accelerate the process will require the use of a multi -prong approach at the start of the project that will focus on quickly identifying potential cost saving opportunities that can be presented to the City Council. However, before reaching the public discussion stage we recommend that opportunities and assessments be reviewed and prioritized by an internal Steering Committee. This prioritization activity will be critical — as it will help the project team focus on more detailed data gathering activities that the Steering Committee believes have the greatest fiscal impact and potentially lower political, employee, or constituent resistance. As you review Crowe's the proposal, we believe it is important to keep in mind that a high -value reason for selecting Crowe is our independence. Crowe's approach comes with no pre - conceived notions about whether a program or service should be restructured, outsourced, privatized or left alone. We recognize that often there are competing viewpoints about the provision of government services that, if not analyzed properly and objectively, may lead to the wrong conclusion, resulting in potentially greater cost or inefficiency. Therefore, we believe that our mission is to not only identify programs /services that may yield savings if done differently, but also to let the City know when our analysis affirms that a particular service is already being provided efficiently or in a manner consistent with best practices. Concluding Remarks Our proposal outlines a three phased approach. Phase 1 — Initial Assessment is to lay the groundwork and formulate opportunities in a 'Roadmap' that is a portfolio of potential cost saving/revenue enhancing initiatives that can be reviewed with the City Council in mid - April. In Phase 2 — Assessment Finalization, we'll take the information and feedback from Phase 1 and further detail out specific savings, costs, and initiatives in the portfolio. Phase 3- Implement Initiatives will be the period when we work in concert with your team to start driving real savings by working on specific initiatives. In addition to our detailed approach to the first phase of this project, please find enclosed our price to complete the first two phases. We understand that the City also would like a quote on the cost of doing an implementation phase. However, because the specific opportunities that should be pursued further are not known, we cannot provide a certain price for Phase 3 services. Nevertheless, as part of our overall approach, we have included a diagram that illustrates the "price /value relationship" that may be expected for different types of cost - saving (or revenue producing) solutions. In presenting this proposal to you our objective is to meet your exact needs. Thus, if you have certain constraints or additional objectives that may have a bearing on your project scope and budget we would be very pleased to discuss those further with you. Again, we appreciate this opportunity to present our proposal for your consideration, and if selected, will give the City our closest attention. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Kevin Smith directly at 214.632.1789, or through email at kevin.w.smith a{�crowehorwath.com. Our entire team is looking forward to providing timely, high - quality, independent, verifiable, cost - effective services to the City of Corpus Christi. Sincerely, Kevin W. Smith, Partner AFFILIATES — Crowe Horwath LLP is an independent member of Crowe Horwath International, a Swiss verein. Each member firm of Crowe Horwath International is a separate and independent legal entity. Crowe Horwath LLP and its affiliates are not responsible or liable for any acts or omissions of Crowe Horwath International or any other member of Crowe Horwath International and specifically disclaim any and all responsibility or liability for acts or omissions of Crowe Horwath International or any other member of Crowe Horwath International. Crowe Horwath International does not render any professional services and does not have an ownership or partnership interest in Crowe Horwath LLP. Crowe Horwalh International and its other member firms are not responsible or liable for any acts or omissions of Crowe Horwath LLP and specifically disclaim any and all responsibility or liability for acts or omissions of Crowe Horwath LLP. Cost Savings / Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas 3 1. Purpose / Goal kAti The City of Corpus Christi will receive an operational roadmap that identifies opportunities that may help drive performance improvement results. These opportunities will identify initiatives that the City can implement to either save costs or generate revenue, and will be based on potential privatization efforts, outsourcing, consolidation of functions, and other areas where efficiencies can be gained. These initiatives will be mapped specifically to business drivers that are specific to the City and an assessment of the high -level savings impact of each one will be identified. With this, the City will be have a prioritized portfolio of potential initiatives with an understanding of how each one effects the strategic business drivers at the City. Specifically, this roadmap will address the following: Identification of the strategic core business drivers at the City ▪ Establishment of a portfolio of potential initiatives that will focus on reducing cost, gaining efficiency, or increasing revenue through privatization, consolidation, outsourcing, or other operational efficiencies Establishment of a high -level assessment of cost and effort for each initiative, along with potential savings How the initiatives should be prioritized High level assessment of when the initiatives should be implemented This assessment will be presented at the City Council meeting that is schedule in the mid -April timeframe. 2. Approach As mentioned in the opening letter, we propose a three phased approach consisting of: • Phase 1 — Initial Assessment: Laying the groundwork and formulate opportunities in a "Roadmap" that is a portfolio of cost savings / revenue enhancing initiatives that can be reviewed with the City Council in mid - April. • Phase 2 — Assessment Finalization: Using the information presented in Phase 1, along with the feedback received, Crowe will further detail out specific savings, costs, and further define initiatives in the portfolio (identifying resources, specific timeframes). In this phase, constraints are identified and the plan is adjusted to reduce risks and set each one up for success. • Phase 3 — Implement Initiatives: This is where specific initiatives in the portfolio are started and cost savings and efficiencies can be realized. The remaining sections in this proposal are to specifically outline the approach for Phase 1 — Initial Assessment. Upon success of this phase, Crowe will outline activities /deliverables for the additional phases. In Phase 1 — Initial Assessment, Crowe will identify opportunities for improvement that may help drive performance improvement results for the City of Corpus Christi. The team will present these opportunities through the Crowe Roadmap development framework as part of an initial 4 -week engagement starting on March 24, 2010 and ending on April 20, 2010. These plans will be developed with a City of Corpus Christi www.crowehorwath.com Copyright 2010 Crowe Horwath LLP Crowe Horwath Cost Savings / Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas 4 sponsor or steering committee team, who will also be further involved in finalizing the plan and will be responsible for executing it. These services will include: Identifying the business drivers (approximately 4 -6 of them) that will be used to drive prioritization efforts, Identifying and describing the set of potential alternative initiatives that would be the starting point of a 'portfolio' of initiatives that the City could elect to implement, Developing a 'heat map' (an example is shown below) to subjectively show how the alternative initiatives will impact desired business objectives, Developing a 'bubble chart' (an example is shown below) to subjectively show when initiatives may occur (on a timeline), a 'back of the envelope' potential savings estimate, and estimated return on investment for each one, and Developing a high level project plan or 'road map' (an example is shown below) for implementation, The following illustrations are examples of the key deliverable components that will be in the Phase 1 report: Example 1: The 'Feat Map' shows initiatives (down the left-hand column) and specific business drivers (show above the top), and a subjective rating of how each initiative maps to the drives (yellow ratings marked 'H', `M`, i'L "). A prioritization of initiatives can then be determined. Please note that in the image below, the Initiatives and Business Drivers will be customized specifically for the City and will not be the same as shown. 1 r t'r'sl:.31hi4 :.:d Ihn .. Y.•'s� Uxz�� -cH .� z-..•.- ii-ss�yrvmii4n�caE t,xtr Its n]•Yfs= r ::- -.N.ixrn kf�q:Ji »k17,C 51t>.'F.vni: 3:T.rtN. nit _�91ti917_:12 1 n m Mar-o-.1 T.r,a:tl.. . . Amin- E_F4121m,tor--- tl. MUNI =EMI ©0 t�r���e�Yp�© ■01111 Rt1i1111011 INNEN 11111111011111111L111 www.crowehorwath.com 0 Copyright 2010 Crowe Ho wath LLP Crowe Horwath.. Cost Savings i Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas Example 2: The "Bubble Chart" shows the portfolio of initiatives. This subjective chart shows the relative position of Time to Savings" (the 'x' axis), compared to 'Strategic Importance' ('y' axis). The size of each bubble is size of savings, and the color represents a different category of the initiative. Please note that in the image below, the characteristics shown will be customized specifically for the City. Example 3: The Roadmap' clearly shows a suggested implementation timeframe for each initiative in the portfolio. Please not that in the image below, the initiatives will be specific to the City. �1 . .,l tom':.. elccnaaostiaif,s I i L STEaTA, Crowe will deliver the project using appropriate, structured project management tools including: Working with the City's project support person ! scheduler to plan for meetings and to facilitate the scheduling of City resources to meet, Conducting a weekly project update with the City's project executive /steering committee and other designates as desired, Developing Gantt charts and/or project calendars to visually manage timelines and personnel commitments, www.crowehorwath.corn CO Copyright 2010 Crowe Hotwath LLP Crowe Horwath.. Cost Savings / Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas 7 the effort for each initiative will be done after Phase 2 and after project charters and resource plans are developed. 3. Staffing Crowe recommends the following project team organization for Phase 1 - Initial Assessment: Kevin Smith — Engagement Execotiv Bert Nuehring, Ann Lathrop Advisors City of Corpus Christi Project Sponsor i Steering Commiftee John Huriburt Delivery Executive Crowe City Stakeholders and Team Members I.TBD • TO • TBD AtIcl Antoneftl Project Manager Business Analyst Crowe Business Analyst Crowe A summary of key roles and responsibilities for Crowe and the City are outlined below. Proposed Team Member Crowe Engagement Executive Kevin Smith • Perform quality assurance • Participate in meetings with the Project Steering Committee • Serve as primary point of contact for the Steering Committee • Oversee engagement deliverable timetable Engagement Advisor Bert Nuehring Ann Lathrop • Advise engagement team and Steering Committee on project objectives • Coordinate research activities on project initiatives • Assist engagement team, as needed www.crowehorwath.com 0 Copyright 2010 Crowe Horvath LLP Crowe Horwath Cost Savings /Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas 8 Role Propo ed Teare mber Key Respons bil(tres Delivery Executive John Hurlburt Oversee Crowe's project team Assure client satisfaction with Crowe Subject Matter Expert Tom Guevara Provide overall guidance and direction to the Crowe project team Serve as the subject matter expert in local government finance and planning Project Manager Alicia Antonetti Manage entire project, working with City, including project scope, issues, risk, time, people, cost, quality and integration Maintain the master project plan Facilitate stakeholder meetings Oversee the creation of all deliverables Facilitate communication and status reporting (including weekly status reports) Advise City on planning approaches Lead team through collaborative planning approach Serve as a subject matter expert Business Analysts TBD Document all Project Team /Stakeholder meetings and interviews Ensure maintenance of library of project documentation Assist with facilitation of meetings/ interviews Prepare all deliverables Serve as a subject matter expert City Project Leadership Team and Project Team City Sponsor TBD x s H Monitor the progress of the project Specify needs and requirements for the stakeholder meetings Help establish the meeting process including proposed agenda, contact timeline and deadline for completion Provide input and feedback throughout project Review project deliverables Facilitate project team communication, working with Crowe Project Manager Assist with project stakeholder scheduling Assist with securing the commitment of human resources for executing the project plan Project subject matter expertise City Stakeholders and Team Members TBD Participate in project work sessions /meeting and interviews, as needed to support the execution of the project plan/ feasibility assessment Provide input, recommendations and subject matter expertise www.crowehorwaf h.com Copyright 2010 Crowe Horwath LIP Crowe Horvath. Cost Savings / Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas 9 4. Project Plan Crowe proposes that Phase 1 start on March 24, 2010 and go through April 19, 2010. This effort would conclude with the presentation to the City Council in the mid-April timeframe. We assume this meeting will be on or before April 20. Timeline of Activities Phase 24-Mar 29-Mar 5-Apr I.12Apr 19-Apr 1. Initiate 2. Assess 3. Formulate and Finalize 5. Pricing Fo-23 S ked Listed below is the proposed fixed price for Phase 1. Several assumptions have been made in the pricing of the deliverables, and those assumptions are noted below. • Phase 1 — Initial Assessment, which is the development of the Roadmap —For work between March 24, 2010 and April 20, 2010. $78,370 Firm Fixed Price inclusive of Fees and Expenses • Phase 2 — Finalize Assessment — A firm fixed price will be provided after Phase 1. This phase will be to provide additional planning and remove additional subjectivity which in turn, increases the chance of success to achieve significant savings. $100,000 $175,000 Based on past experience, typically 8-10 high priority initiatives will be identified. The price range above (inclusive of fees and expenses) is based on the number of high-priority initiatives identified and could be higher or lower based on the number of initiatives identified (and the complexity of each) for the City. • Phase 3 - Implement Initiatives Billing Rates for this work range from $130/hr to $2501hr Please Note: Our objective is to meet your exact needs. Thus, if you have certain constraints or additional objectives that may have a bearing on your project scope and budget we would be very pleased to discuss those further with you. We would welcome the opportunity to have an open dialogue about our pricing with you and make adjustments where needed. www.crowehorwath.com 0 Copyright 201G Crowe Horwath LLP Crowe Horwath Cost Savings / Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas 10 Crowe has prepared this document based upon our current level of knowledge relating to the project. Therefore, the cost estimates and commitments provided in this document are based on key considerations made related to staffing, system requirements, and future events. Should any of the key considerations documented below prove to be false, or if open issues cannot be resolved, the cost estimates and time commitments we have provided to you may change. Any such change will be discussed with the City Sponsor through a structured change management process. The City will provide active and supportive functional area leadership to answer questions, participate in meetings, and support analysis work through personal and team supported assistance. If individuals will not be able to provide input in Phase 1, Crowe will continue with subjective evaluation. The City will identify a project sponsor who will review and approve deliverable documents within one business day. If deliverable documents are not acceptable, the City will provide information on what is needed to satisfy expectations within 5 business days of receipt of deliverables. Work will primarily be performed on -site at the City of Corpus Christi facility and the Crowe offices. H. is assumed the City will provide a conference room (or other office space), conference phone access and Internet access, normal office materials, and a printer for this effort. Under the guidance of the City sponsor, Crowe will obtain information and insight from the Steering Committee team. The City will provide an internal scheduler / project support person who will coordinate stakeholders' calendars, setup meetings, and manage communication with the appropriate Crowe contact. ' The City will make the Sponsor, Steering Committee, and other desired resources available for a weekly call to evaluate progress, discuss current issues, and discuss upcoming activities. The Phase 1 deliverable will be a presentation in a Microsoft Powerpoint format with supporting documents determined between Crowe and the City. Activities related to Phase 2 of the assessment will not begin until a new Statement of Work is approved by the City. www.crowehorwath.com © Copyright 2010 Crowe Horwalh LIP Crowe Horwath . Cost Savings 1 Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 11 City of Corpus Christi, Texas Resumes Kevin W. Smith, CPA, Partner Public Sector Services t.. , .i ; 1 ' f, Mr. Kevin Smith has over eighteen years experience in public accounting in a broad range of industries which includes providing audit and advisory services to multiple levels of state and local governmental. Additionally, he has served a speaker for various state Government Finance Officers Association, Association of Governmental Accountants, International Bridge Tunnel and Turnpike Association conferences, and as an instructor at the Southwest School of Government. Mr. Smith was previously in- charge of KPMG's Dallas public sector audit group. City of Azle ** City of Allen * ** • City of Arlington City of Bentonville, AR ** City of Carrollton City of Dallas City of Denton ** * City of Frisco City of Grand Prairie ** City of Irving * ** City of Lubbock ** City of McKinney ** City of Midland City of Plano City of San Antonio ** Employee Retirement Fund of Dallas el tai tii g r... Dallas Fort Worth International Airport Houston Housing Finance Corporation Houston Metro Transportation Authority ** North Texas Tollway Authority * The Navajo Nation ** • Collin County ** • Dallas County * ** • Somervell County ** Schoot Dallas Independent School District * Houston Independent School District ** F -e ti_,gi's :r i-'fli.i,:f"ith The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas (OMB A -133) * ** University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences ** ■ University of Oklahoma * ** Paul Quinn College * ** © Copyright 2010 Crowe Horwath LIP State of Arkansas — State Wide CAFR * ** State of Illinois -- State Wide Single Audit -- Various Agencies State of Oklahoma — Various State Agencies • Amon G. Carter Foundation ArtCentre of Plano Bass Foundation • Carter Blood Center Catholic Diocese of San Angelo Cotton Bowl Association ** Dallas 2012 ** Greater Dallas Chamber of Commerce Harris Methodist Foundation Lee & Ramona Bass Foundation Meadows Foundation National Math and Science Initiative JC Penny Afterschool Fund • Performing Arts of Fort Worth Presbyterian of Dallas Foundation Sid Richardson Foundation • Work Source for Dallas County I kqilill • Dallas County Hospital District Midland County Hospital District * ** • Flower Mound Hospital Partners * Southwest Imaging Center Partnership • Physicians Medical Center Rockwall Regional Hospital Southlake Specialty Hospital TpHR LLP Texas Health Resources www,crowehorwath.com Crowe Horwath. 11 Cost Savings / Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas * Federal Compliance audit performed in accordance with OMB Circular A -433 ** Served as pre - issuance review partner * ** Served as lead engagement manager prior to election to partnership Financial Advisory Departmental Costing Analysis o North Texas Tollway Authority - Automated toll collections Implementation of GASB 34 o State of South Carolina — Office of the Comptroller General o Cities of Dallas, Fort Worth, Frisco, Irving, and Plano Operational and Procedural Audits o City of Dallas - Police and Fire o City of Dallas - Landfill & Solid Waste o City of Dallas — Fleet Maintenance o City of Dallas - Streets o City of Dallas — Finance o Dallas Independent School District — Custodial Services and Fleet Maintenance o City of New Orleans — Finance Department o City of McKinney — Economic Development o City of Irving — Economic Development Business Process Reengineering Development of Strategic Plan o Oklahoma Department of Transportation o North Central Texas Council of Government — Workforce Operations o City of Fort Worth - Financial Management Policies Fund Structure and Chart of Accounts o Dallas - 21012 - Not - for - Profit Procedures Manual Development o Finance Department o Grant Department City of Fort Worth - Year End Closing and CAFR Preparation Certified Public Accountant — Texas _ '_ < ooni 4:1'. iafions American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Texas CPA Society Association of Governmental Accountants Government Finance Officers Association — Certificate of Excellence Reviewer Government Finance Officers Association of Texas Past Advisory Board Member of the Southwest School of Government East Central University, Ada Oklahoma Bachelor of Science in Accounting, with Honors www.crowehorwalh.com ® Copyright 2010 Crowe Ho wath LLP Crowe Horwath. 12 Cost Savings 1 Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas Bert Nuehring, CPA Partner Mr. Bert Nuehring has over twenty -four years experience in public accounting. Mr. Nuehring has experience providing services to the government, not -for- profit and private industries. He has participated in numerous municipal, state and local governmental audit and consulting engagements. .. Gtv,N, School Districts Community High School District #155* Elgin School District U -46* Crystal Lake Community Consolidated School District No. 47* ** EvanstonlSkokie School District #65* Macomb Community Unit School District #185* ** Plainfield Community Consolidated School District #202* ** Reed - Custer Community Unit School District #255U* Valley View Public Schools* ** Woodridge School District #68* ** Municipalities City of Berwyn* City of Decatur* ** City of Springfield* ** Village of Bensenville* ** City of Fort Worth Village of Homewood* ** Village of Rantoul* ** Township of Addison City of Chicago City of East St. Louis Special Districts Chicago Housing Authority Chicago Park District Chicago Transit Authority* Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago* ** Metre* Pace - Suburban Bus Division of the RTA* ** 13 Counties Hamilton County, Ohio Cook County, Illinois* Kane County, Illinois* ** Sangamon County, Illinois* Will County, Illinois* ** St. Clair County, Illinois State Agencies Department of Agriculture Department of Corrections Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Department of Human Services Department of Natural Resources Department of Public Aid Department of Public Health Department of Rehabilitation Services* Department of Revenue Department of Transportation` Department Workforce Development Illinois Finance Authority Educational Facilities Authority Emergency Management Agency* Environmental Protection Agency State Board of Education Department of State Police Student Assistance Commission* Higher Education Chicago State University* Governors State University* Moraine Valley Community College* South Suburban College* ** University of Illinois* Federal Compliance audit performed in accordance with OMB circular A-133 Current Recipient of GFOA or ASBO Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting *Bert's CPE records are available upon request. www.crowehorwath.com 0 Copyright 2010 Crowe HorwaIh LLP Crowe HOrwath . Cost Savings 1 Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Compliance and Reporting Assessments ▪ Subrecipient Monitoring Process Design and Outsourcing OMB Circular A -87 Compliance Audit Finding remediation • Federal and State Grant Accounting and Reporting • Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) Preparation and Consultation • Cash Flow Forecasting ▪ CDBG and HUD Compliance Training Manual • Enterprise Fund Rate and Cost Analysis • Federal Cognizant Determination Letter Special Procedures • Federal Compliance Eligibility, Analysis and Report Preparation • Technical Assistance on GAAP and Financial Statements and related Procedures Development Illinois (Statewide) GASB 34 Readiness • Illinois (Statewide) GASB 34 Implementation Operational Audit of the Implementation of Enforcement Programs • Requirements Analysis and Restructuring of Long -Term Debt Operational Audit of the Implementation of Enforcement Programs alifj Certified Public Accountant — Florida, Illinois, Missouri, Arkansas, Ohio, California Pi ,- ss ss'{ American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Association of School Business Officials International — Accounting, Auditing and Budgeting Committee Certificate of Educational Achievement — Governmental Accounting and Auditing Government Finance Officers Association — Special Review Executive Committee Illinois CPA Society — Governmental Executive Committee EthicatiOri Wartburg College, Iowa Bachelor of Arts in Accounting www.crowehorwath.cern Copyright 2010 Crowe Homalh I.GP Crowe Horwath 44 Cost Savings / Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas Tom Guevara — Senior Manager Public Sector Services 15 Mr. Guevara is a Senior Manager for the Government Finance division of our Public Sector Services Strategic Business Unit. Mr. Guevara has over 20 years of management experience serving both state and local government, specializing in the areas of public finance, budgeting and information technology management. He is responsible for municipal client deliverables in Indiana and Illinois, and serves as relationship manager for some of Indiana's largest cities. His experience covers a wide breadth of client financial public finance needs and solutions. Some of the engagements Mr. Guevara has managed include_ Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, Indiana, Financial Advisory Provided financial advisory services for a $660 million new money bond issuance for the financing of a new hospital, ambulatory clinic, related facilities and renovations to existing facilities. These bonds were sold at two sales of two series each using both traditional tax - exempt bonds and Build America Bonds direct payment subsidy bonds. Services included preparation of financial information required for voter referendum, advising the Corporation on issuance amounts and timing, monitoring market conditions to determine issuance amounts, advising corporation during pricing calls, working with underwriters and structure adjustments, and review of related financing documents. Indiana Bond Bank, Fuel Hedging Program Implementing an innovative program to use financial swap agreements to hedge price volatility in the purchase of gasoline and diesel. This program was recently implemented as a pilot program for six of Indiana's largest cities and has been expanded to include other governmental units in Indiana for FY 2010. Other participating units include school corporations, other cities and towns and counties. Warrick County, Indiana, Economic Development Commission Provided analysis of a financial projections and feasibility for the proposed $350 million Village Earth Project. Services provided include estimation of tax revenue from sales, income and property taxes, as well as testing assumptions of the proposed education, entertainment and private development (hotel, restaurants and recreation amenities) portions of the project. In addition, Mr. Guevara has prepared an economic impact study for the project to measure the direct and indirect economic impact of the construction project and operations of the Village Earth on area jobs, earnings and output utilizing Bureau of Economic Analysis' RIMS II model. www.crowehorwath.Com ©Copyright 2010 Crowe Horwath LLP Crowe Horwath. Cost Savings 1 Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas 16 Village of Elmwood Park, Illinois Provided an analysis of tax increment financing termination procedures for the Village's tax increment area in order to maximize revenues that may be received from both property taxes and sales taxes (state and local) at termination and in the immediate three succeeding years after termination of the property tax component of the TIF, Procedures required under the Illinois Compiled Statutes were reviewed, with specific recommendations sent to the Village's outside attorney for review and concurrence. Howard County, Indiana, Delphi and Chrysler Bankruptcy Rainy Day Fund Loans, Local Option Income Taxes Implementation, and manufacturer abatement analysis Worked with County Auditor, County Council, County Commissioners and key department heads to identify borrowing needs of the County and County units due to the non - payment of personal property taxes discharged under bankruptcy proceedings. Worked with elected County Officials, State Office of Management and Budget, Department of Revenue, Department of Local Government Finance, and local City officials to implement supplemental County Option Income Taxes for funding the County's jail and juvenile detention center and providing property tax relief. Analyzed abatement forms submitted by a major manufacturer to determine if claimed deductions were calculated correctly. Resulting analysis provided to County showed claimed deductions were millions of dollars higher than allowed under state law and regulations. ie , State of Indiana — Indianapolis, IN Chief Information Officer -- Family and Social Services Administration Responsible for information technology projects and expenditures in excess of $140 million annually, serving over 8500 agency users statewide. Developed agency's strategic plan for information technology Responsible for performance of over 250 staff and contractors Negotiated multiple service contracts which included service level agreements and performance incentives State of Indiana — Indianapolis, IN Assistant State Budget Director /Health and Human Services Division — Indiana State Budget Agency Supervised division and budget analysts, including development of two -year operating budgets for three state health and human service agencies, totaling over $3 billion in annual expenditures Approved quarterly appropriation allotments for State Department of Health, Department of Veterans Affairs and Family and Social Services Administration Conducted efficiency and expenditure studies and worked with both the Executive and Legislative branches on policy and budgeting issues affecting the performance and funding of each agency Indiana University — Bloomington, IN School of Public and Environmental Affairs Adjunct Instructor Instructor in budgeting, financial management and public management for both undergraduate and graduate level courses. www.croweharwath.com Copyright 2010 Crovre Horwalh LLP Crowe Horwath Cost Savings i Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas 17 City of Bloomington — Bloomington, IN Controller Prepared, presented and administered city's annual budget. Participated in financial and project planning leading to the implementation of over $80 million in new capital projects, including work required to issue bonds, negotiate leases, and as needed, gain approval of financing plans from oversight commissions and the legislative council. Responsible for preparation of City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, Received GFOA Award for Excellence in Financial Reporting each year Member of the Mayor's Policy Team American Management Systems, Inc. -- Fairfax, VA • Principal • Project Manager: City of New York Human Resources Administration • Project Manager: State of Colorado Department of Human Services • Project Manager: State of Ohio Department of Human Services Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana Master of Public Affairs, Finance Bachelor of Science, Marketing www.Growehorwath.com © Copyright 2010 Crowe Horwath LLP Crowe Horwath Cost Savings 1 Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas Alicia Antonetti- Tricker Industry Focus Government and Justice Business Expertise Project management, strategic planning, program evaluation, shared services, and business process review and redesign. Certifications PMP: Project Management Professional, Project Management Institute Industry Client Project Role Government Division of State Court Administration State -wide Court Case Management System Implementation Project ManagerlProject Management Support Created strategy, approach and plan for the deployment of a statewide case management system for pilot courts, in preparation to deploy the system statewide to over 320 courts in 92 counties. • Managed risk, scope, issues, communications, resources and change for project team. Managed third party software provider and provided leadership and guidance to the project deployment teams. Industry Client Project Role Criminal Justice County Prison Prisoner Movement Study Subject Matter Expert • Provided expertise to project team in the area of justice and public safety as well as providing project management support to the project team, Industry Client Project Role Criminal Justice County Sheriffs Office Jail Oversight Committee, Phase 3 Workgroup Project Manager /Facilitator /Subject Matter Expert • Led the Jail Alternatives Committee working group in the identification, research and prioritization of alternatives to incarcerations for their county. Provided support to the Working Group and Data Committee. Industry Client Project Role Government City Department Economic Impact Study Project Manager and Lead Analyst • Conducted an economic impact study that involved analyzing fiscal impact, direct economic impact Crowe Horwath www.crowehorwath.com C3 Copyright 2010 Crowe Wawalh LIP 18 Cost Savings 1 Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas and indirect economic impact for the city. 19 Industry Government Client Social Services Agency Project ERP Implementation / PeopleSoft Financials Role Project Manager — Business Process and Training Teams Led the business process team in the understanding of current business processes and the documentation of future state business processes that utilize the general ledger, accounts payable, accounts receivable, billing, grants management and customer contracts module. Led the training team in the development of framework and materials for training subject matter experts and end -users on the accounts receivable, billing, grants management and customer contracts module. Created templates and approaches as well as executed project plans for training and business process documentation. Industry Government Client County Auditor Project Property Tax and Billing System Selection Role Project Manager Led and managed the team to create a Request for Proposals (RFP) to select a new property tax and billing system for the county. Facilitated information gathering sessions to determine system functional requirements. Created the RFP document and coordinated its release to vendors. Facilitated the bidders conference and interview sessions with select vendors. Managed project scope, timeline, risks, issues and budget. Industry Government Client Department of Administration, Division of Enterprise Technology Project Shared Services — Server Consolidation / Shared Information Services Role Project Manager -- Agency Review and Rollout of Services Led and managed a team to document current IT infrastructure business practices for 26 state agencies and design future state profiles for each agency under the shared service model. Facilitated the design of the enterprise shared services strategy and designed the approach and methodology for individual agency transitions to the new service model. Led a team to rollout share services to state agencies, including design and management of overall project plan and management of risks and issues. Industry Financial Institution Client Bank Project Sarbanes -Oxley 404 Implementation www.crowehorwath.com 0 Copyright 2010 Crowe iiorwath LIP Crowe Horvath Cost Savings / Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas 20 Role Project Manager Managed the implementation of the SOX Section 404 implementation including the documentation and testing of internal controls. Industry Criminal Justice Client County Planning Council Project Criminal Justice System Strategic Plan Project Result Developed a 10 -year public safety strategic plan for the adult and juvenile corrections and adjudication communities. Role Lead Analyst Facilitated sessions with justice community leaders and staff to identify systemic issues, determine and prioritize strategic to address those issues and identify potential resource options to support the plan. Industry Justice Client State Judicial Center, Court Alcohol and Drug Program Project Court Alcohol and Drug Program Curriculum Checklists Project Result Developed a procedure and checklists as well as constructed several sample forms and cover letters to provide educational support for a court alcohol and drug program. Role Project Manager Established a standardized procedure and checklist to be used by the agency when determining whether a curriculum meets the substance abuse education provisions of the rules for court - administered alcohol and drug programs, Established a standardized procedure and checklist to be used by the agency when determining compliance with the educational requirements of the rules and communicating an explanation of denial to the submitting court regarding program curriculum through standardized forms. Industry Client Project Project Result Justice State Superior Court, Probation Department Business Process Review, Redesign and Implementation Redesigned process for intake that reduced a series of activities from over 40 days to one day. Redesigned the pre - sentence investigation process to complete reports for in- custody defendants within 21 days, which would positively impact jail overcrowding. Significant changes to casework and response to non - compliance which resulted in more time for probation officers to spend in the field supervising probationers. Role Project Manager and Co- Facilitator a Reviewed and redesigned the processes for the intake, casework, pre - sentence investigation and response to noncompliance functions. Industry Client Copyright 2010 Crowe Horwath LLP Government State Dept of Counter - Terrorism and Security Council www.crowehorwath.com Crowe Horwath Cost Savings / Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project Role Enterprise Project Management Application and Support Lead Analyst Implemented and supported a web -based tool for management and collaboration of critical counter- terrorism projects across multiple state agencies. • Designed and delivered project management education courses to users of the web -based project management tool. Industry Criminal Justice Client County Agency, Conditional Release office Project Criminal Justice System -Wide Strategic Plan Role Project Manager and Lead Analyst • Provided oversight for the implementation of a redesigned process for the pre -trial services agency. Served as the process improvement analyst on the team that redesigned the process. Prepared and maintained client deliverables including workflow diagrams, written reports and presentations. 21 Industry Non Profit — Intervention and Prevention Client State Homelessness Coalition Project Board of Directors Consulting Project Result Developed a transition plan from the current membership model to the proposed new model. Role Lead Analyst • Assessed the current state of the BOD and recommended a new structure to be aligned with the new strategic direction of the organization. Collected data and made recommendations based on best practices of board membership models. Industry Client Project Role Justice State Superior Court Traffic Division Case Management Process Review and Redesign Project Manager and Lead Facilitator • Performed process review of court case management practices and redesigned areas for improved efficiencies in the Traffic Division. Facilitated a process in which the team analyzed the current process then had each team utilize benchmarking resources, brainstorming and best practices ideas to create a new streamlined and more effective case management workflow process for the traffic division of the court. Industry Client Project ® Copyright 2010 Crowe I- orwath LLP Justice State Superior Court Case Management Process Review and Redesigns of the D Felony, Domestic Violence and Civil Court Divisions www.crowehorwath.com Crowe Horvath Cost Savings / Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas Role Process Improvement Analyst • Performed process review of court case management practices and redesigning areas for improved efficiencies in the D Felony, Domestic Violence and Civil Divisions. Facilitated a process in which the team analyzed the current process then had each team utilize benchmarking resources, brainstorming and best practices ideas to create a new streamlined and more effective case management workflow process for the traffic division of the court. Industry Client Project Project Result Government Department for Local Government Evaluation of the Community Development Block Grant Program Increased training for grant administrators, an improved Federal funding draw down rate, and increased communication with community leaders responsible for housing and infrastructure development. Role Analyst H Performed a program evaluation of the distribution of community development block grant funds to non - entitlement towns and cities. c.- <, =s.y fy n anti • Perspectives, the Journal of American Probation and Parole Association, Better, Cheaper, Faster — Applying Business Process Redesign to Probation (Fall 2004) International Institute of Business Analysis — Central Indiana Chapter, "The No Guessing Approach to Requirements Gathering" (11!07) Indiana Digital Government Summit, "Shared Services" (06/06) American Correctional Association, °Probation Process Review and Redesign: One Court's Experience — Marion Superior Court Probation Department" (07/04) Pr d i -' - f.aE • Project Management Institute (PM!) • Project Management Institute --- Central Indiana Chapter (PMICIC) Education Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana Master of Public Affairs (MPA), Policy Analysis University of California, Davis, Davis, California B.A., Political Science and Sociology www.crowehorwath.co m Copyright 2010 Crowe Horwath LIP Crowe Horwath 22 Cost Savings / Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas John M. Hurburt, Principal Industry Focus .... .................. .. Business Expertise Health and human services, criminal justice, transportation, treasury, education, and administration. Government 23 Industry Client Role Government State Agency Project Executive • Provide oversight for the external communication and outreach activities to service providers and community organizations that serve public assistance clients • Manage a team in developing a voluntary community network consisting of these organizations and providers across the state to better serve their clients when applying for public assistance Industry Government Client State Agency Role Project Executive Led effort to define process efficiencies and new technology requirements in their Violent Crimes division • Provided oversight in analyzing the backlog of claims in the Violent Crimes division, along with finding ways to maximize revenues to pay these claims, Industry Client Government State Education Department • Oversight of an effort to identify process efficiencies within the Professional Standards Division focusing on teacher's licensing • Worked with division director and leadership team to strategically identify organizational changes and efforts to improve their processes. • Coached leadership team to get staff buy -in, by forming project teams, and focus on ways to improve operations and enhance the customer experience. Industry Client Government Department of Transportation • Led efforts to redefine way local firms respond to client's construction projects where federal matching dollars are used • Oversaw a collaborative effort where local public agencies, professionals and the federal oversight liaison developed new processes for responding, letting, and contracting for new projects. www.crowehorwath.com 0 Copyright 2010 Crowe Horwath LIP Crowe Horwath Cost Savings / Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas Industry Client Government State Agency 24 • Played a role similar to a CIO role at a point the new executive team was developing the agency business plan. This included the initial development of an information technology plan that was to support the business plan. • Initial steps were to inventory the systems currently in use and start to create a plan to consolidate them. • This role concluded with the hiring of a full time CIO. Industry Client • Organized, planned and managed the initial phases of an initiative to consolidate IT infrastructure hardware into a centralized agency (server consolidation). This effort included working with approximately 40 agencies under the executive branch in the State. The plan and justification showed how the State, through a collaborative approach, could save several million dollars a year through this initiative by consolidating IT infrastructure, having a single agency support this infrastructure, and have this single agency provide services back to the other agencies. Government Department of Administration • The initial phase was to perform an assessment which included the following: a) identification and inventory of IT hardware, software and support personnel, b) creating a conceptual design that focused on having the centralized hosting agency provide services to the other agencies, not just on consolidation and movement of hardware, c) providing estimates of costs that this effort would incur, and the savings that would be generated, and d) a preliminary implementation plan including timing and staffing for the initiative. • This phase also focused on identifying the additional staffing needs for the centralized agency, and the savings that would be achieved through the organizational changes that would need to occur within all the other agencies being supported. This organizational plan was used as input for the biennium budget that was being developed. Industry Client Government Department of Treasury • Implemented a multi - million dollar software development project which consisted of developing a system that would receive, evaluate, award, and track students attending public and private universities receiving state funded scholarships and tuition grants. This system is used to manage the over $120 million in awards given to students on an annual basis. • The system also extended the State's capabilities to award and monitor additional programs resulting in millions of more dollars being distributed to post - secondary students. In addition, it enhanced the State's ability to collaborate with the 110 universities and institutions in the state of Michigan, the students and the high schools. • This project interfaced with over six other agencies or departments and included approximately a 10 person consulting team working with a 15 person client team. Industry Client Financial Institution Private Bank, International • Consolidated several internal departmental help desks throughout the organization into on consolidated client service center and reorganized the IT organization to have one centralized Program Management Crowe Horvath www.crowehorwath.com ® Copyright 2010 Crowe HorwaUh LLP Cost Savings f Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas 25 Office (PMO). This effort saved the bank over $800,000 in costs on an annual basis. • Provided expertise in the restructuring of both, the Information Technology group and the Operations group to report to a single executive vice president. This effort included streamlining the number of direct reports to the executive level, identifying and leading the transition projects and activities, and developing and executing the communications plans. industry Financial Institutions Client Private Bank, International • Transitioned a custom, in -house development information technology department to a 90- member group that can support the new third -party vendor applications that are used to run the business. Not only was the organization replacing their existing customized systems, they were also in- sourcing the infrastructure and service desk functions that were previously outsourced. The purpose of this effort was to reduce the overall operating costs of the bank. • Ensured the proper staffing and skills were developed to support the new systems being implemented. This included mapping out the new IT organization structure, identifying the requirements of each position, staffing the organization, and ensuring readiness to support the new systems. Support did not only mean staffing, but also was defined by making certain the software applications could be supported and the IT processes were in place. • This new group had four elements to it; Infrastructure, Client Services (help desk), Business Solutions (software development, project management, database support), and Service & Quality (quality control). This new IT group supports all information technology functions throughout a 1,500 - employee bank. Industry Client Financial Institutions Private Bank, International • Assessed the infrastructure projects related to an overall systems implementation, which involved reviewing the status of the ongoing projects and coordinating the implementation of better project management controls and policies. • The infrastructure portion of this project included replacing all voice and data networks throughout the main offices and the 52 branches, building new data centers, implementing enterprise backup solutions, converting to MS Exchange, and rolling out new PCs installed with new systems software throughout the organization, • The assessment included working with management and all project leads to plan and track projects better, define and decouple dependencies between projects to reduce risk, and increase communication between all groups. • The purpose of this project was to establish an infrastructure that could be supported internally instead of being outsourced. This was a temporary position held for 3 months until a permanent replacement was identified. Industry Client Government State Education Department • Implemented a web -based framework that collected student information. • Developed a system that would allow the state to collect information on every student in the State from kindergarten through twelfth grade, This was a collaborative system that extended from the Department of Education to every School Corporation and school building in the state. • The purpose of this project was to support new state law that focused on accountability in the Crowe Horvath www.crowehorwath.com © Copyright 2010 Crowe tHorwath L4r' Cost Savings / Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas classroom. 26 Industry Government Client State Police Department Analyzed current workflow and systems to design a new integrated system that supported the tracking of automobile crashes. • This role required planning all project steps, coordinating business meetings, collecting the business requirements, and ensuring client satisfaction. Industry Client Manufacturing International Pet Food Manufacturer • Managed million - dollar supply -chain business system project, which involved supervising 25- person consulting implementation team working with 20- person client team, and overseeing overall project success. This project included integrating multiple packaged solutions with custom developed IBM Websphere web interfaces and provided the client interfaces to ensure inventory availability to their national accounts through third party distributors. Through acquisitions, this company had new go -to market channels that their existing direct store delivery (DSO) systems could not support. This project was to implement new systems to support the increased number of customer orders and shipments to the additional retail outlets. Industry Client Government State Transportation Department • Analyzed the effectiveness of a 170 member IT group to support a 3,000- member agency divided into six autonomous divisions. • Collaborated with and organized feedback from all the division directors, as well as from the IT director and chiefs, gained consensus and presented feedback to the agency. • Devised short, medium and longer -term steps to improve and assess the impact these would have on the organization. Industry Client Government Professional Standards Board • Analyzed current workflows and systems to design a new integrated system that supported the agency to track teacher licenses as well as their external business partners and customers. • Managed timeline and budget of a three person consulting team, planned all project steps and business meeting sessions, collected and analyzed new business requirements, and ensured client satisfaction. • The purpose of this project was to determine the effectiveness of the existing systems to support the changing business processes and to provide a roadmap for new initiatives to be executed. Member of the Board of Directors for the Boys and Girls Clubs of Indianapolis serving over 12,000 youth in 10 locations across the city. www.crowehorwath.com Copyright 2010 Crowe Horwath LLP Crowe Horwath Cost Savings 1 Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas Project Management Institute (PM]) - Member of the PMI-CIC (Central Indiana Chapter) Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio Bachelor of Science in Computer Science www.crowehorwath.corn 0 Copyright 2010 Crowe Hotwath LLP Crowe Horvvath 27 Cost Savings / Revenue Enhancement Roadmap Assessment (Phase 1) City of Corpus Christi, Texas Ann Lathrop, CPA, Partner With over 20 years of experience in both the private and public sectors, Ann currently leads the Market Development and Sales (MDS) group for Crowe Horwath LLP (Crowe). MDS consists of over 60 professionals who are responsible for marketing strategy, advertising, branding, web development, social media strategies, publishing, marketing execution, lead generation, inside sales, proposal development and field sales compensation management. Ann is also an executive member of the Crowe Relationship Management team that provides learning opportunities for key executives in sales and business development. Ann's focus is not just internal to Crowe but also includes a strong client relationship with the City of Indianapolis. Ann is the key account executive and has participated in many projects over the past five years including: stimulus monitoring and reporting, financial process reviews, IT strategic plan, shared services analysis, operational efficiency study, and budget book redesign. Prior to joining Crowe, Ann held executive positions with Affiliated Computer Services, Lockheed Martin, and KPMG /Bearing Point. Ann has also held various roles in the public sector since 1991. Ann currently serves as President of the Capital Improvement Board (CIB). The CIB is a municipal corporation of Marion County, IN created to finance, construct, equip, operate and maintain any capital facilities or improvements which promote and serve the commercial, industrial and cultural interests of Indiana and its citizens. The CIB operates the Indiana Convention Center, Lucas Oil Stadium, Conseco Fieldhouse, Victory Field, Virginia Ave Parking Garage, and Capitol Commons, all located in downtown Indianapolis. Ann was named President of the Board in January 2010. She is the first woman to hold this post. Ann was also the first woman named City Controller for the City of Indianapolis in 1997, where she served as Deputy Controller prior to that. Ann also served as part of Mayor Greg Ballard's transition team and led a fiscal review for the city after Ballard's election in 2007. She has also served as the Chief Financial Officer for the Department of Metropolitan Development. Ann is a current member of the AICPA and serves on the following boards: • President, Indianapolis- Marion County Capital Improvement Board • President, Ft. Harrison Reuse Authority • Member of the Indiana Convention and Visitor Association (ICVA) Board www.crowehorwath.com (0 Copyright 2010 Crowe Horwalh LLP 28 Crowe Horwath Exhibit C Crowe Horwath LLP Standard Engagement Terms The Consultant wants the City to understand the basis under which the Consultant offers its services to the City and determines Consultant's fees, as well as to clarify the relationship and responsibilities between the City and the Consultant. These terms are part of the Consultant's engagement letter and apply to all future services, unless a specific engagement letter is entered into for those services. The Consultant specifically notes that no advice the Consultant may provide should be construed to be investment advice. CITY'S ASSISTANCE - For the Consultant to provide its services effectively and efficiently, the City agrees to provide the Consultant timely with the information the Consultant requests and to make City employees available for Consultant's questions. The City will also provide the Consultant's personnel with access to the Internet (if available). The availability of City's personnel and the timetable for their assistance are key elements in the successful completion of the Consultant's services and in the determination of Consultant's fees. Completion of the Consultant's work depends on appropriate and timely cooperation from the City's personnel; complete, accurate, and timely responses to the Consultant's inquiries; and timely communication by the City of all significant accounting and financial reporting platters of which the Consultant is aware. If for any reason this does not occur, a revised fee to reflect the additional time or resources required by the Consultant will be mutually agreed upon, and the City agrees to hold the Consultant har nless against all matters that arise in whole or in part from any resulting delay. If circumstances arise that, in the Consultant's professional judgment, prevent the Consultant from completing this engagement, the Consultant retains the right to take any course of action permitted by professional standards, including declining to express an opinion or issue other work product or withdrawing from the engagement, after the Consultant gives the City five work days written notice of the breach and sets out a reasonable opportunity to cure. THIRD -PARTY PROVIDER — The Consultant may use a third -party service provider in . providing professional services to the City which may require the Consultant sharing the City's confidential information with the provider. If the Consultant uses a third -party service provider, the Consultant will enter into a confidentiality agreement with the provider to require them to maintain the confidentiality of the City's confidential information. The terms of the Consultant's engagement letter and these engagement terms shall apply to any third -party provider. CONFIDENTIALITY -- Consultant will maintain the confidentiality of City's confidential information in accordance with professional standards. The parties understand that the City of Corpus Christi is a Texas home -rule municipal corporation, a local governmental entity organized under the laws of the State of Texas, and subject to, inter alia, the Texas Public Information Act (Chapter 552 of the Texas Government Code) and the Texas Open Meetings Act (Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code). City agrees not to disclose any proprietary or confidential material City obtains from Consultant without Consultant's prior written consent unless (1) the Office of the Texas Attorney General (OTAG) has issued a ruling to release the information; (2) the City is otherwise required to disclose or release the information by law; or (3) the disclosure is contemplated by the parties under this engagement. Consultant retains the right to use the ideas, concepts, techniques, industry data, and know -how Consultant uses or develops in the course of the engagement. City agrees to the use of fax, email, and voicernail to communicate both sensitive and non - sensitive matters; provided, however, that nonpublic personal information regarding City's customers or consumers shall not be communicated by unencrypted email. CHANGES - The Consultant may periodically communicate changes in laws, rules, or regulations to the City. However, except as it relates to and impacts the scope of services under this Agreement, the City has not engaged the Consultant and the Consultant does not undertake an obligation to advise the City of changes in laws, rules, regulations, industry or market conditions, the City's own business practices, or other circumstances, except to the extent required by professional standards and as such changes may impact or directly relate to the services described herein. NO PUNITIVE DAMAGES - Any liability of either party shall not include any special, punitive, or exemplary damages or loss nor any lost profits, savings, or business opportunities. MEDIATION - If a dispute arises, in whole or in part, out of or, related to this engagement, or after the date of this Agreement, between the City or any of the City's affiliates or principals, and the Consultant, and if the dispute cannot be settled through negotiation, City and the Consultant agree first to attempt, in good faith, to discuss, consider and come to a mutual decision regarding whether it is in the best interest of both parties to first try in good faith to settle the dispute by mediation before resorting to litigation or any other dispute - resolution procedure. An agreement to mediate must stipulate that the results of mediation shall be binding only upon agreement of each party to be bound, and may stipulate that each party will be responsible for their own costs of any mediation. LEGAL AND REGULATORY CHANGE - The scope of services and the fees for the services covered by the accompanying agreement are based on current laws and regulations. If changes in laws or regulations change the City's requirements or the scope of Consultant's work, the City and the Consultant agree that the Consultant's fees will be modified to a mutually agreed -upon amount to reflect actual additional fees and expenses incurred and solely attributable to said legal or regulatory changes. AFFILIATES — Crowe Horwath LLP is a member of Crowe Horwath International, a Swiss association. Each member firm of Crowe Horwath International is a separate and independent legal entity. Crowe Horwath LLP and its affiliates are not responsible or liable for any acts or omissions of Crowe Horwath International or any other member of Crowe Horwath International and specifically disclaim any and all responsibility or liability for acts or omissions of Crowe Horwath International or any other member of Crowe Horwath International. Crowe Horwath International does not render any professional services and does not have an ownership or partnership interest in Crowe Horwath LLP. Crowe Horwath International and its other member firms are not responsible or liable for any acts or omissions of Crowe Horwath LLP and specifically disclaim any and all responsibility or liability for acts or omissions of Crowe Horwath LLP. 27 AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: July 20, 2010 SUBJECT: Oso Water Reclamation Plant Service Area Collection System Enhancement Program Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract (Project No. 7410) AGENDA ITEM: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a construction contract with Huff and Mitchell, inc. of Cypress, Texas, in the amount of $1,500,000 for the first 12 -month period (Base Year) for the Oso Water Reclamation Plant Service Area Collection System Enhancement Program Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract. ISSUE: This project is within the Oso Water Reclamation Plant (WRP) collection system (bounded by Oso Bay on the east, Oso Creek and Oso Parkway on the south, near Weber Road and Ayers Street on the west and Ocean Drive on the north). See Exhibit "E" Location Map. This project is part of the lifecycle program to extend the service life of the wastewater systems and reduce the Infiltration and Inflow (MI) of storm and ground water into the wastewater collection system. I &i typically results in pipe and roadway failures, sanitary sewer overflows with increased treatment capacity and pumping requirements at the plants and lift stations. This project will identify specific Delivery Orders to address the most critical areas of the deteriorated collection system and I &I to improve the overall system and operating cost, This IDIQ contract was developed for multiple delivery orders for an initial base year with options for two additional one -year extensions within available funding. The annual contract value and award is programmed for $1,500,000. The bid documents presented the maximum combined total work over the three years with additional potential emergency delivery orders. The delivery orders will be issues based on the unit bid prices proposed by the contractors within the available funding. On June 30, 2010, the City received proposals from two (2) bidders (see Exhibit "C" Tabulation of Bids). The Base Bid ranges from $6,598,833.50 to $10,619,473, for the maximum combined total work over three years with additional potential emergency delivery orders. The estimated cost of construction for the Base Bid is $1,500,000. The City's consultant, LNV Engineering and City staff recommend a contract be awarded to Huff and Mitchell, inc. of Cypress, Texas in the amount of $1,500,000 for the first 12 -month period (Base Year) for the Oso Water Reclamation Plant Service Area Collection System Enhancement Program IDIQ Contract, FUNDING: Funding is available from the Wastewater Capital Improvement Budget FY 2010, RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. Foster Crowell Director of Wastewater Services 361 - 857 -1801 fosterecctexas.com Additional Support Material: Exhibit "A" Background information Exhibit "B" Prior Project Actions Exhibit "C" Tabulation of Bids Exhibit "D" Project Budget Exhibit "E" Location Map Pete Anaya, P. E. Director of Engineering Services 361- 826 -3781 peteanacctexas. com -407- 1-1:WpMeiVeimaPAGEMWASTEWATERad10 ARn WRP AFRVIr_F ARP& irnrnrnNcrni irrin,np er_rmne AGENDA BACKGROUND INFORMATION SUBJECT: Oso Water Reclamation Plant Service Area Collection System Enhancement Program Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract (Project No. 7410) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project consists of wastewater collection system improvements in the Oso Water Reclamation Plant services area. The scope of work includes but is not limited to rehabilitation and/or replacement of manholes; rehabilitation and/or replacement of gravity collection lines and /or force mains by pipe bursting, cured -in -place pipe, and /or open -cut method for lines up to 36- inches in diameter, gravity line point repairs; dewatering through well pointing; control of wastewaterflows through bypassing; cleaning and televised inspection of conduits; temporary traffic controls; other appurtenances; site disturbances of >1/4 acre will require a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP); all sites must comply with the Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) Construction General Permit for Storm Water; provisions for emergency and non - emergency work conditions; to be executed with multiple indefinite quantity delivery orders as required, in accordance with the plans, specifications, and contract documents. The initial contract will be for one (1) base year (12- calendar months), with two (2) optional one (1) year (12- calendar month) extension. BID INFORMATION: On June 30, 2010, the City received proposals from two (2) bidders. The Base Bid ranges from $6,598,833.50 to $10,619,473, for the maximum combined total work over three years with additional potential emergency delivery orders. The estimated cost of construction for the Base Bid is $1,500,000. The City's consultant, LNV Engineering and City staff recommend a contract be awarded to Huff and Mitchell, Inc. of Cypress, Texas in the amount of $1,500,000 for the Base Bid for the Oso Water Reclamation Plant Service Area Collection System Enhancement Program IDIQ Contract. CONTRACT TERMS: The project is a 12 -month contract and will be subject to renewal for up to two (2) additional 12 -month periods. PROJECT BACKGROUND: Deterioration of the City's wastewater collection system allows Infiltration and Inflow (I &I) of storm and ground water and dirt into the system. This results in reduced capacity for wastewater flows with potential manhole overflows that may lead to noncompliance with environmental regulations. The Infiltration also causes degradations to the soils and backfill potential undermining above structures such as roadways and sidewalks which lead to potential cave -ins. This project is part of the on -going program to systematically address each of the City's six treatment plant collection systems. This project involves the study and evaluation of the wastewater lines in the existing collection system to develop a replacement schedule for the lines that are at or beyond their useful service life. Lines in the most deteriorated condition and those creating the most severe maintenance issues will be prioritized for replacement. This project will replace lines and manholes on a yearly basis to the extent that funding allows. This is the second wastewater project to utilize the I &I Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (D1Q) process for designing and award of construction projects. The design contract was approved by City Council on March 23, 2010 to LNV Engineering. The first wastewater project was for the Laguna Madre Basin, which was approved by the City Council on July 28, 2009. A similar contract is being initiated for the Broadway Basin with Urban Engineering. IDlQ contracts are routinely used by the state, school systems, federal entities and other municipalities. The use of IDIQ contracts provides fixed unit prices from a contractor for a given period of performance and available funding limits. During the given performance period(s), the contractor may be issued individual —408— EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 2 delivery orders based on a specified construction scope and duration. Developing the bid package in the IDIQ format allows the City to select contractors based on the most competitive unit prices. The City can then use these established unit prices to determine the most effective solutions to address a particular rehabilitation /replacement. The City retains the option to issue multiple delivery orders and renewable performance periods. Under this methodology, the City and contractor can establish a better working relationship and anticipate an improved quality of service from the contractor to receive additional delivery orders and contract extensions. The City staff is recommending the award to the construction contract to develop individual delivery order scopes and estimates to address the wastewater system problems. Having an existing contract with the contractor and consultant allows open dialogue to develop the most cost- effective solutions by combining the consultant's solutions with the best means and methods of the contractor. This methodology also ensures that the project scope and cost can be fully developed and executed within the available CIP funding and with real -time solutions to the problems. -409- H :WOMEWe1mePIGENlWASTEWATER17450 DSO WRP SERVICE AREA IDIMCONSrRUCTIOH13 AGENDA RACKC,RnLINn nm EXHIBIT "A" Page2of2 PRIOR PROJECT ACTIONS SUBJECT: Oso Water Reclamation Plant Service Area Collection System Enhancement Program Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract (Project No. 7410) PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION: 1. December 15, 2009 - Ordinance approving the FY 2010 Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Planning Guide in the amount of $202,877,800. (Ordinance No. 028449) 2. March 23. 2010 — Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Contract for Professional Services with LNV Engineering of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the amount of $229,110, for a total restated fee of $274,440, for design, bid, construction and additional phase services for Oso Infiltration /Inflow Related Collection System Enhancement Program and Programmed Wastewater Line Lifecycle Replacement. (Motion No. M2010 -058) PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION: 1. December 28, 2007 - Distribution of Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2007 -05 CIP Projects FY 2008 -2009 Scoping, Estimating, Design Services to 191 engineering firms (78 local and 113 non - local). 2. January 14, 2008 - Addendum No. 1 to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2007 -05 CIP Projects FY 2008 -2009 Scoping, Estimating, Design Services to 191 engineering firms (78 local and 113 non - local). 3. January 17, 2008 - Addendum No. 2 to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2007 -05 CIP Projects FY 2008 -2009 Scoping, Estimating, Design Services to 191 engineering firms (78 local and 113 non-local). 4. June 2, 2008 — Administrative approval of a Small A/E Agreement for Architect/Engineer Consultant Services with LNV Engineering in the amount of $45,330 for the Oso Infiltration /Inflow Related Collection System Enhancement Program and Programmed Wastewater Line Lifecycle Replacement for preliminary design services. —410— EXHIBIT `B„ Page 1 of 1 TABULATED BY: TABULATION OF BIDS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING - CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS Pete Anaya, PE, Director of Engineering Services TIME OF COMPLETION: 385 Calendar Days Page 1 of 9 DATE: July 5, 2010 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: Base Award: 51,500,000 OSO W.R.P. SERVICE AREA COLLECTION SYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM IDIO CONTRACT PROJECT NO. 7410 Huff 3 Mitchell 13626 fj'vpfeaa- UNIT PRICE Inc. Rludge TX 77420 TOTAL COST [CITY x UNIT PRICE] Jhabores 6349 . C • us Ch UNIT PRICE Coast Co. Inc. Leopard , TIC 76466 TOTAL COST (OTYx UNIT PRICE] BID ITEM NO. QTY (Bid Evaluation ONLY -NOT FOR AWARD} UNIT DESCRIPTION WW1 1 LS Mobilixatia&Bondsllnsurance 1500,000.00 5500,000.00 5200,00000 5200,000.00 WW2 250 Remove and Replace s8^ Wastewater Line (0' - w Depth] 550.00 512,500.00 5160.110 540,000.00 WW3 250 Remove and Replace s8^ Wastewater Line (6' -10' Depth) 554.00 513,500.00 5195.00 118,750.00 W W4 250 LF Remove and Replace s8" VNsstevrater Line (10' - 14' Depth) 158.00 114,500.00 5252.00 163.000.00 W W5 250 LF Remove and Replace s6` Wastewater Lice (14 - 18' Depth) 570.00 117,500.00 53611.00 592,000.00 W W6 250 Remove and Replace SB" Wastewater Line (>16' Depth) 560.00 520.000.00 5714.00 5178,500.00 WW7 250 LF Remove and Replace 70` Wastewater Line (0' - 8' Depth) 854.00 513,500.00 1164.00 541,000.00 00008 250 Remove and Replace 10` Wastewater Line (6' -10' Depth) 5558.00 514,500.00 1200.00 550,000.00 W W9 250 LF Remove and Replace 1[Y Wastewater Line (10' - 14' Depth) 565.00 116,250.00 5258.00 164,500.00 WW10 250 LF Remove and Replace 10' Wastewater Line (14' - 18' Depth) $75.00 518,750.00 5373.00 193,250.00 WWII 250 Remove and Replace 10' Wastewater tine ( >1B Depth) 590.00 r 522,500.00 5719.00 5179,750.00 WW12 250 LF Remove and Replace 12' Wastewater Line (0' - 8' Depth) $8.00 514,500.00 5170.00 142,500.00 WW13 250 LF Remove and Replace 12' Wastewater Line !6' - 10' Depth) $2.00 515,500.00 5204.00 151,000.00 W W14 250 Remove and Rapists 12" wastewater Line (10' - 14' Depth) 575.00 518,750.00 1262.00 165,500.00 W W 15 250 Remove and Replace 12" Wastewater Line (14' - 18' Depth) 5100.00 525,000.00 1377.00 $94.250.00 W W 16 250 Remove and Replace 12- Wastewater Line (>113' Depth) 5120.00 $30,000,00 5723.00 1180,750.00 WW17 150 LF Remove and Replace 18" Wastewater Line (0' - 6' Depth) 575.00 511,250.00 5170.00 525.500,00 W W18 150 LF Remove and Replace 18' Wastewater Line J6 -10' Depth) 580.00 512,000.00 5250.00 537,500.00 WW19 150 LF Remove and Replace 18" Wastewater Line pee -14' Depth) 590.00 513,500.00 5307,00 548,050.00 W W20 150 Remove and Replete 18" Wastewater Line (14' -18' Depth) 5125 -00 518,750 -00 1423.00 563,450 -00 W W21 150 LF Remove and Replace 16' Wastewater Line ja18' Depth] 5150.00 522,500.00 5768.00 5115,200.00 WW22 150 LF Remove and Replace 24' Wastewater Line (a - B Depth} 590 -00 513,500.00 5260.00 539,000.00 W W23 150 Remove and Replace 24' Wastewater Line (6' - 10' Depth) 5100.00 515,000.00 5295.00 144,250.00 WW24 150 LF Remove and Replace 24' Wastewater Line (10' - 14' Depth) 5110.00 518,500.00 1353.00 152,950.00 W W25 150 LF Remove and Replace 24' Wastewater Line (14' - 16' Depth) 5150.00 5225500.00 5468.00 170,200.00 WW26 150 LF Remove and Replace 24" Wastewater Line ( >18 Depth) 5180.00 $27,000.00 1614.00 5122.100.00 W W27 150 LF Remove and Replace 30" Wastewater Line (0' - 6' Depth) 5110.00 516,500.00 5359.00 553,650.00 WW28 150 LF Remove and Replace 30' Wastewater Line s6' -10' Depth) 5120.00 518,000.00 1417.00 162,550.00 WW29 150 LF Remove and Replace 30` Wastewater Line !10'- 14' Depth) 5130.0D $19,500.00 5532.00 579,600.00 W W30 150 LF Remove and Replace 30- Wastewater Line ,(14' -16' Depth) 5180.00 127,000.00 5878.00 5131,700.00 WW31 150 LF Remove and Replace 30` Wastewater Line 5718' Depth} $2DO.OD 130,000.00 ; 51,570.00 5235,500.00 'The highlighted areas indicate an error in an extension which did not acted the low bid. The totals reflected here are the Unit Price x Qty. Section 5 -2 -7 states, `The unit price shall govern over the amount.' -411- EXHIBIT "C" Page 1 of 9 Page 2 of 9 'The highlighted areas indicate en error in an extension which did not affect the tow bid The totals reflected here are the Unit Price x Qty. Section B-2 -7 states, "The unit price shall govern over the amount." -412- EXHIBIT "c" Pape 2 of 9 WW32 100 LF Remove and Replace 36' Wastewater Line 0' - 6 De , h 5110.00 511.000.00 $415.00 541,500.00 WW33 100 LF Remove and Replace 36' Wastewater Line 6'- 10' 0e, h 5120.00 512,000.00 5473.00 517,300.00 100 LF Remove and Replace 36" Wastewater Line (10' - 14' Depth) 5130.00 513,000.00 1588.00 558,800.00 100 LF Remove and Replace 36' Wastewater Line 14' • 18' De 5200.00 120,000.00 5934.00 593,400.00 WW38 100 Remove and Replace 36" Wastewater Lane >18' De. $250.00 525,000.00 51,825.00 5762.500.00 Trench Safety for Remove & Replace Wastewater Line W W37 1500 [0'- 6'Depth) I 51.00 51.500.00 55.00 57.500.10 W W38 1500 Trench Safety for Remove & Replace Wastewater Line (6' - 10' Depth) 52.00 53,000.00 510.00 515,000.00 WW39 1500 Trench Safely for Remove 8 Replace Wastewater Line [10' - 14' Depth) 53.00 $4,500.00 520.00 530,000.00 WW40 1500 Tfe Safety for Remove & Replace Wastewater Line (14' - 18' Depth) 54.00 $8,000.00 550.00 575,000.00 W W41 1500 Trench Safety for Remove & Replace Wastewater Line ( >16' Depth) 5500 57,600.00 5100.00 5150,000.00 W W42 250 Rehab s8' Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting) [0' - 6' Depth) 535.00 58,750.00 550.00 512,500.00 W W43 250 Rehab SIC Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting) {8' -10' Depth) 110.00 110,000.00 550.10 312,500.00 WW44 250 Rehab 58' Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting] (0 • 14' Depth) $15.00 511,250.00 558.00 514,500.00 W W45 250 Rehab S8' Wastewater Line [Pipe Bursting) 14' - 18' Depth) 570.00 517,500.00 572.00 518,000.00 WW46 250 Rehab 'Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting( (>18' Depth) $85.00 521,250.00 572.00 518,000.00 WW47 250 Rehab 10' Wastewater Line {Pipe Bursting] (0'. 6' Depth) 540.00 510,000.00 567.00 516,750.00 WW48 250 Rehab 10' Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting) B' - 10' I - $15.00 511,250.00 567.00 516,750.00 W W49 250 Rehab 10' Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting} OOP - 14'Depth) t 550.00 512,500.00 575.00 518,75000 WW50 250 Rehab 10' Wastewater line {Pipe Burshng} 114' - 18' Depth) 575.00 518,750.00 584.00 521,000.00 Rehab 10" Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting] WW51 250 (118, Dew) 590.00 522,500.00 $84.00 521,000.00 1M1rW52 250 Rehab 12' Wastewater Line [Pipe Bursting] (0'- 6'Depth) $50.00 512,500.00 575.00 518,750.00 WW53 250 Rehab 12' Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting) [6' - 10' Depth} 555.00 513,750.00 575.00 518,750.00 WW54 250 Rehab 12' Wastewater Line (Pipe bursting] [10' - 14' Depth) 560.00 515,000.00 587,00 521,750.00 WW55 250 Rehab 12' Wastewater Line (Pipe bursting] 14'- 18'De, h 5100.00 525,000.00 5101.00 525250.00 W W56 250 LF Rehab 17 Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting] (a18' Depth) 512000 530,000.00 5101.00 525,250.00 Wastewater Line (Pipe Bting] WW57 250 LF Rehab 15 Bursting) (0' - 6' Depth) 560.00 515,000.00 5108.00 527,000.00 WW58 250 LF Rehab 15' Wastewater Line (Pipe Burslingy (6' - 10' Depth) 570.00 517,500.00 5108.00 527,000.00 WW59 250 LF Rehab 15' Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting) (10' - 14' Depth) 580.00 $20,000.00 3118.00 529,500.00 Rehab 15' Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting) WW60 250 LF (14'- 18' Depth) 5120.00 530.000.00 5151.00 537,750,00 W W61 250 LF Rehab 1S Wastewater tine (Pipe 8ursling} (>18' Depth) 5140,00 135,000.00 5151.00 537,750.00 WW62 150 LF Rehab 18' Wastewater Line {Pipe Bursting] (1' - B' Depth) 580.00 512,000.00 5179.00 526,850.00 WW83 150 LF Rehab 18" Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting] (fi - 10' Depth) 5100.00 515,000.00 5179.00 526,850 .00 WW6'% 150 LF Rehab 18' Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting) 1;10 - 14' Depth) $120,00 518,000,00 5125.00 529250.00 WW65 150 LF Rehab 18' Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting] 14'- 18' De. h 5140.00 121,000.00 5205.00 530.750.00 W W66 150 LF Rehab 18' Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting) ( >18' Depth) 5180.00 527,000.00 5205.00 530,750.00 WW67 150 LF Rehab 24' Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting] (0' - 6' Depth) 5100.00 515,000.00 3254.00 538,10000 Rehab 24' Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting) W W68 150 LF (6' _ 10' Depth) 5120-00 $18,000.00 5254.00 $39,100,00 WW89 150 LE Rehab 24' Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting] (10'- 14' Depth) 5140.00 521,000.00 $272.00 $40,800.00 WW70 150 LF Rehab 24' Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting] (14' - 18' Depth) 5180.00 527,000.00 5290.00 543,500.00 'The highlighted areas indicate en error in an extension which did not affect the tow bid The totals reflected here are the Unit Price x Qty. Section B-2 -7 states, "The unit price shall govern over the amount." -412- EXHIBIT "c" Pape 2 of 9 Page 3 of 9 'The highlighted areas indicate an error in an extension which did not affect the low bid. The totals reflected here are the Unit Price x Qty. Section 5.2 -7 states. 'The unit price shall gover`ovrihtamount.' EXHIBIT `rC" Paae3of9 160 LF Rehab 24' Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting) a78' De 520000 530,000.00 5290.00 $43,500.00 WW72 150 Rehab 30' Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting) (0' - 6' Depth) 5160,00 524.000.00 5344.00 551.800.00 Rehab 30' Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting} WW73 150 LF S, • 113, De, 5200.00 $30,000.00 5344.00 $51,6130.00 Rehab 30' Wastewater Line WW74 150 (fie Bursting) 5220.00 (10' - 14' Depth) 533,000.00 5381.00 557,150.00 WW75 150 Rehab 30' Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting) {14' - 18' Depth) 5250,00 537,500.00 5417.00 562,550.00 W W76 150 Rehab 30' Wastewater Line (Pipe Bursting) $28000 [ >18' Depth) $42,00000 5417.00 562,550.00 WW77 10 Service Re-connection for 8` Pipe Bursting {0' • 6' Depth] 5600.00 56,000.00 5521.00 55,210.00 WW78 10 Service Re-connection for 10' Pipe Bursting (0' - 6' Dew) 5700.00 57000.00 5521.00 55,21000 W W79 10 Service Re -connection for 1 Y Pipe Bursting $800.00 (0' • 6' Depth) 58.000.00 5521.00 55,210.00 WW80 5 Re -connection for 15- Pipe Bursting 51,000.00 0'- 6'Depth) 55.000.00 5835.00 53.175.00 W W81 5 Service Re-connection for 18' Pipe Bursting {0' • 6' Depth) 51,100.00 55,500.00 5713.00 53,565.00 W W82 5 Service Re-connection for 24' Pipe Bursting 1 {0' - 6' Depth) 57.500.00 57,500.00 02800 $4.140.00 WW83 5 he Re-connection for 30' Pipe Bursting io : 52,000.00 510,000.00 1 $877.00 54,385.00 WW83A 500 VF Depth for Service Reconnections for Pipe 515.00 Bursting (>6' Depth) (per VF per EA) Rehab 8" Wastewater Line {Cured in•Piace Pipe] WW84 250 LF 54000 0 (5' Depth) $7.500.00 ! 554.00 527,000.00 510,000.00 560.00 515,000.00 W W85 250 Rehab 8` Wastewater Line (Cured -in- Place -Pipe] (6'- 10' Depth} $47.00 570,250.00 560.00 5.15,000.00 88 250 Rehab 8' Wastewater Line {Cured- In- Place•Pipe) (10' -14' Depth) 542.00 $70,500.00 580.00 515,000.00 W W87 250 LF Rehab 8' Wastewater Line {Cured-Place -Pipe} {14' - 18' Depth] 543.00 510,750.00 =51.00 515,250.00 W W88 250 Rehab 8' Wastewater Line (Cured-in-ace-Pipe) ( >18' Depth) 551.00 $12,750.00 1 561.00 515,250.00 Rehab 10' Wastewater Line (Cured-in-Place-Pipe) WW89 250 LF (0' - 6' Depth) 542.00 510,500.00 581.00 515,250.00 510,750.00 $61.00 $15,250.00 Rehab 10` Wastewater Line {Cured-in-Place-Pipe) 543.00 WW90 250 LF (8' - 713' Depth) WW91 250 Rehab 10` Wastewater Line {Cured irrPlace Pipe] 4400 (10' -14' Depth) 511,000.06 $61.00 515,250.00 WW92 250 LF Rehab 10' Wastewater Line (Cured -in -Place -Pipe) (14' -18' Depth) 545.00 ! 571,250.00 1 $67.00 515250.00 W W93 250 LF Rehab 10` Wastewater Line {Cured in Place Pipe] (>18' Depth) 554r 00 513500 00 56400 516,000.00 WW94 250 LF Rehab 17' h]astewater Line (Cured-in-Place-Pipe) 550.00 0 -6' 512,500.00 569.00 517,250.00 1NW95 250 LF Rehab 7r Wastewater Line ( Cured in Place pipe) 551.00 (6'- 10'Depth) $12,750.00 589.00 517,250.00 Rehab 12' Wastewater Line (Cured-in-Place-Pipe) 5552.00 W W98 250 LF OD' • 14' Depth) $13,000.00 569.00 517,250.00 WW97 250 LF Rehab 12' Wastewater Line {COredtimPlaoe Pipe] 555.00 (14' - 18' Depth) 513,750.00 589.00 517,250.00 WW98 250 LF Rehab 72' Wastewater Line {Cured- in- Place 560.00 X18' Depth) 575,000.00 569.00 517,250.00 Rehab 15" Wastewater Line [Cured -in -Place -Pipe} WW99 250 LF 360.00 0' - 8' Depth} 515,000.00 575.00 578,750.00 Rehab 15' Wastewater Line (Cured-in-Place -Pipe) WW1D0 250 LF {g, -113 Depth] 582.00 5.15,500.00 375.00 518,750.00 Rehab 15' Wastewater Line (Cured » in -Place -Pipe) WW101 250 LF 10' 14' Depth} $64.00 575,000.00 $75.00 518,750,00 WW 702 250 LF Rehab 75' Wastewater Line (Cu red in Place Pipe] 572.00 (14' -18' Depth) 518,000.00 f{ 575.00 518.750.00 Rehab 15 W W 103 250 LF ,8' Depth) Wastewater Line (cured -in -Place Pipe] ! $86.00 521,500.00 1 575.00 518,750.00 Rehab 18' Wastewater line (Cured -6n -Place -Pipe) WW104 150 LF {0' - 6 Depth? 573.00 510,950.00 585.00 512,750.00 Rehab 18" Wastewater Line (Cured-in-Place-Pipe) I 57500 WW105 150 LF (8' - 10' Depth) 511,250.00 $85.00 512,750.00 WW106 150 LF Rehab 18' Wastewater Line ;Cured•in place -Pipe) (10' -14' Depth) 583,90 $12,450.00 585.00 512,750.00 Rehab 1r W W 107 150 LF {14 78' Wass ater line (Cured in Place Pipe} $88.00 $13,200.00 $85.00 $12,750.00 W W 708 150 LF Rehab 18' Wastewater Line (Cured-in-Place-Pi pe] ( >18' Depth) 594.00 $14,100.00 585.00 512,750.00 WW109 150 LF Rehab 24' Wastewater Line (Cured-in-Place-Pipe) 5112.00 10' - 6' Depth) $16,800.00 5126.00 518,900.00 'The highlighted areas indicate an error in an extension which did not affect the low bid. The totals reflected here are the Unit Price x Qty. Section 5.2 -7 states. 'The unit price shall gover`ovrihtamount.' EXHIBIT `rC" Paae3of9 Page 4 of 9 W W 110 150 LF Rehab 24' Wastewater Line [Cured- in•Place Pipe] {6' - 10' Depth) 5116.00 517.400.00 5126.00 518,900.00 WW111 150 LF Rehab 24' Wastewater Line (Cured -in- Place -Pi + ) [10' - 14' Depth) I 5121.00 516,150 -00 5126.00 518,900110 WWI 12 150 LF Rehab 24' Wastewater Line [Cured- in- PlaCe•Pipe} (14' -15' Depth) 5127.00 519,050.00 5126.00 518,900.00 WW113 150 LF Rehab 24' Waslewaferiine (Cured-in-Place-Pipe) (>18' Depth) 5138 -00 520,700.00 5126.00 518,900.00 WWli4 t50 LF Rehab 30" Wastewater Line (Cu red- irrPlace -Pipe] (0' - 6' Depth) 5163 -00 524,450.00 5181.00 527,150.00 W W 115 150 LF sehah0 Wh stewaler Line (Cured -in Place Pipe] 5171.00 525,650,00 5161.00 527,150.00 WW116 150 LF Rehab 30' Wastewater Line [Cured'in Place-Pipe] ( 10' - 14' Depth) 5180.00 527,000.00 5181.00 527,150.00 W W 117 150 LF Rehab 30' Wasiswaier Line [Cured-in Place Pipe] (14*- 18' Depth) 5198.00 529,700.00 _ 5181.00 527,150.00 WW118 150 LF Rehab 30 Wastewater Line (Cured-in-Place-Pipe) ( >18' Depth) 5220 00 $33,000.00 5181.00 527,150.00 W W 119 100 LF Rehab 38' Wastewater Line (Cured in Place -Pipe) �0'-6'Dept2) 520400 520,400.00 5212.00 521,200.00 WW120 100 LF Rehab 36' Wastewater Line (Cured -in- Place Pipe) -10' Dealt) 5215.00 521,500.00 5212.00 521,200.00 W W121 100 ?[6' LF Rehab 38' Wastewater Line (Cured-in-Place-Pipe) (10' • 14' Depth) 5221.00 522,100.00 5212.00 521.200.00 W W 122 100 LF Rehab 38' Wastewater Line (Cured-in-Place-NW (14*- 18' Depth) 5237 -00 525,700.00 5212.00 521,200.00 WW123 100 LF Rehab 36' Wastewater Line (Cured-in-Race-Pipe) [ >18' Depth) 5248.00 524,80000 5212.00 521,200.00 WW124 10 EA Service Re- connection for 8' C.1PP Wastewaler Line 5150.00 51.500.00 591.00 5910.00 'W/125 10 EA Service Re- connection for 10` CIPP Wastewater Line 5150.00 51,500,00 591.00 5910.00 WW126 10 EA Service Re connection for 12' CIPP Wastewater Line 5150.00 51,500.00 591.00 5910.00 W W 127 5 EA Service Re- connection for 15' CIPP Wastewater Line 5300.00 51,500.00 5121.00 5605.00 W W 128 5 EA Service Re- connection for 18' CIPP Wastewater Line 5300.00 51,500.00 5366,00 51,630.00 WW129 5 EA Service Re- connection for 24' CIPP Wastewater Line 5300.00 51,500.00 5363.00 51,815.00 WW130 5 EA Service Re- connection for 30' CIPP Wastewater L'Irre 5600.00 53,000.00 5363.00 51,615.00 W W 131 5 EA Service Re- connection for 36' CIPP Wastewater Life 5600.00 53,000.00 5363.00 51,815.00 W W132 20 LF Point Repair Wastewater Line [D'- 6' Depth) (15 LF Min) 5180.00 53,600.00 5373.00 57A50.00 WW133 20 LF Point Repair 58' Wastewater Line j8'- 10' Depth) (15 LF MIn) $4,000,00 5450.00 59200.00 WW134 20 Point Repair 8• Wastewater Line LF (10'- 14' Depth) (15 LF Min) ` 5250.00 55,000.00 5604.00 512,080.00 W W135 20 LF Point Repair Sr Wastewater Line (14'- 18' Depth) (15 LF Min) 5600 ,00 512,000.00 5893.00 517,860.00 W W136 20 LF Point Repair SS' Wastewater Line (>18' Depth) (15 LF Mln) 5700.00 514,000.00 51.757.00 535,140.00 WW137 20 Poinl Repair 10" Wastewater Line LF (0'- e' Depth) (15 LF Min) 5230.00 54,600.00 5381.00 57,620 00 WW138 20 LF Poirrl Repair 10' Wastewater Line 10' Depth) (15 LF Mtn) 5250.00 55,000.00 5468.00 59,360.00 WW 139 20 ..(6% LF Point Repair 10' Wastewater Line (10'- 14' Dep1h) (15 LF Min) 5300.00 56,000.00 5614.00 512,220.00 W W 140 20 Point Repair 10' Wastewater Line LF (14'- 18' Depth) (15 LF MIn) 5350.00 57,000.00 5900.00 518,000.00 WW141 20 LF Pots Repair 10" Wastewater Line ( >18' Depth) (15 LF Min) 5400.00 58,000.00 51,764.00 535,280.00 WW142 20 Point Repair 12' Wastewater Line LF (0'- 6' Depth) (15 LF Min) 5240.00 54,800.00 5387.00 57,740.00 WW143 20 Point Repair 12` Wastewater Line LF (6'- 10' Depth) (15 LF Min) 5260 -00 55.20000 5473.00 59,460.00 WW144 20 LF Point Repair 12" Wastewater Line (10'- 14' Depth) (15 LF Min) 528000 55.60000 5618.00 512,360.00 WW145 20 LF Print Repair 12 Wastewater Line (14'- 18' Depth) (15 LF Min) 7300 -00 56.000.00 5906.00 518,120.00 WW146 20 Point Repair 12' Wastewater Line LF (518' Depth) (15 LF MI) l 5350.00 57,000.00 51,771.00 535,420.00 W W 747 20 LF Point Repair 15' Wastewater Line (0'- 6' Depth) (15 LF Min) 5260.00 55,200 -00 5416.00 58,320.00 W W 148 20 Point Repair 15' wastewater Line LF (6'- 1 D' Depth) {15 LF Min) 5280.00 55,600.00 5502.00 510.04000 WW149 20 LF Point Repair 15' Wastewater Line (10'- 14' Depth) (15LFMIn) 5300.00 56,000.00 5646.00 512,920.00 'The highlighted areas Indicate an error in an extension which did not affect the low bid. The totals reflected here are the Unit Price x Qty. Section S -2 -7 slates, The unit price shall govern yvpr 4e amount.' EXHIBIT "C" DOWta A ►.F 0 Page 5 of 9 WW750 20 LF Point Repair 15' Wastewater Line (14'- 18' Depth) (15 LF MIr ( 5340.00 56,1400.474 57,600.00 $5,600.00 5935.00 51,799.00 $429.00 518,700.00 535,980.00 58,580.00 WW751 WW152 20 20 LF LF P0rra Repair 15` Wastewater Line >18'De. h 15 LF Mln Point Repair 18' Wastewater Line {0'- 6' Depth) (15 LF Min) 5380.00 5280.00 WW753 20 LF Point Repair 18' Wastewater Line 6'- 10' Depthy(l5 LF Min) S300•00 - 38,000.00 $548.00 310,920.00 WW154 20 LF Pain[ Repair 18' Wastewater Line 10'- 14' Depth]j15 LF Min] 5320.00 56,400.00 5690.00 513,800.00 WW155 20 LF Pofrn Repair 1B` Wastewater Line 14'- 1B' Depth) (15 LF Mln( 5340.00 5380.0(1 $8,800.00 57,600.00 L 5978.00 51,843.00 519,560.00 ' 536,860.00 , WW156 20 LF RAM Repair 18' Wastewater Line ( >18' Depth) (15 LF MIn) WW157 2D LF Point Repa'r 24" Wastewater Line 0'- 6' DepthJ_{15 LF MIrt].� 56.000.00 ' 5490.00 39,800.00 W W 358 20 LF Point Repair 24' Wastewater Line (6'- 10' Depth) (15 LF Mln) $350.00 57.000.00 $577.80 511,540.00 W W159 20 LF Point Repair 24' Wastewater Line (10'• 14' Depth) (15 LF Min) 5400.00 $8,000.00 5751.00 515,020.00 - WW160 20 LF Poird Repair 24' Wastewater Line (14'- 18' Depth) (15 LF MIn) 5450.00 $9,000.00 51,009.00 520,180.00 W W161 20 LF Point Repair 24` Wastewater Line ( >18' Depth) (15 LF Mln) 5560.00 510,000.00 51,874.00 $37,480.00 W W 162 20 LF Point Repair 30` Wastewater Line (0'- 6' Depth) (15 LF MI n) 5350.00 17,000.00 5611.00 512,340.00 WW163 20 LF Point Raper 30" Wastewater Line 6'- 10' l]e_pth]S15 LF MIn} 5400.00 58,000.00 5703.00 $14,060.00 WW1&! 20 LF Point Repair 30' Wastewater Line 10' -14' Depth]jl5 LF MIn , $450.00 59,000.00 5847.00 516,940.00 W W165 20 LF Point Repair 30' Wastewater Line 14'- 18' Depth) (15 LF Mini 5500.00 510,000.00 51,135.00 522,700.00 WW166 20 LF Point Repair 30' Wastewater Line (ate' Depth) (15 LF Min) 5550.00 511,000.00 52,000.00 540,000.00 W W 167 20 LF Point Repair 36' Wastewater Line (0'- 6' Depth(St5 LF MIn] . 5400.00 38,000.00 5715.00 314,300.00 W W }68 20 LF Point Repai 3B' Wastewater Line (6'- 10' Deplh)1_15 LF MIn] 5450.00 59,000.00 5801.00 516,020.00 WW169 20 LF Point Repair 36' Wastewater Line (10'- 14' Depth)J15 LF MIn) 5500.00 510,000.00 5945.00 518,900.00 WW 170 20 LF Point Repair 36" Wastewater Line 14'- 18' Depth) (15 LF MIn) 5550.00 511,000.00 51,233.00 524,660.00 WW171 20 LF Point Repair 38' Wastewater Line (? 18' Depth) { 15 LF MI n) 5700.00 514,000.00 52,098.00 541,960.00 WWT72A 100 LF Excavation Safely for Wastewater Line Point Repair 0'- 6'Depth] S10.00 51,006.00 55.00 5500.00 WW1728 100 LF Excavation Safety for Wastewater Line Point Repair (6' - 10' Depth) 515.00 $1,500.00 510.00 51,000.00 WW1 72C 100 LF ExravaUen Safety for Wastewater Line Poets Repair (10' - 14' Depth) 12000 $2 00000 540.00 54,000.00 WW172D 100 LF Excavation Safely for Wastevrater Line Point Repair (14'- 18' Depth) 325.00 52,500.00 580.00 58,000.00 W W172E 100 LF Excavation Safety for Wastewater Line Point Repair (>18' Depth) 550.00 55.000.00 5100.00 510,000.00 WW173 200 LF Service Lateral Replacement (0' - E Depth Main, includes Clean Out, Boot, coupling, elc.1110 LF Min] 560.00 512,000.00 5103.00 520.600.00 WW174 290 LF Service Lateral Replaoemerd (6". 10' Depth Maln, Includes Clean Cut, Boot, coupling, etc]j1 D LF Min( $70.00 514,000.00 5131.00 526,200.00 WW175 200 LF Service Lateral Replacement [10' - 14' Depth Maps, Includes Clean Oul, Boot, coupling, elc)j10 LF Min) $86.00 516,000.00 5189 -00 - 537,800.00 W W 176 200 LE Service Lateral Replacement (14' - 18' Depth Main, Incudes Clean Out, Boot, cOuplin9,e1c) (10 LF Min) 590.00 518,000,00 5361.00 572,200.00 WW177 200 LE Service Lateral Replacement (>18' Depth Main, Includes Clean Out, Boot, coupling, etc1(10 LF Min) 5100.00 520,000.00 5702.00 5140,400.00 WW178 500 LF Well PolMing for Line Work (Per LF of Trench) (0'-e' Depth) (100 LF Min) 530.00 515,00060 56.00 $3.000.00 W W 170 500 LF Wa8 Pointing for Line Work (Per LF of Trench) (5' -10' Depltt]S1D0 LF Min) x70.00 535,000.00 513.00 56,500.00 W W 180 500 LF w Pointing Por>t for Line Work (Per LF of Trench] 10'- 14'Depthys100 LF Min) $85.00 542.500.00 525.00 512,500.00 W W 181 500 LF Well Pointing !or Line Work (Per LF of Trench] (14' -18' Depth) (100 LF Min) 5100 470 55000000 536.00 518,000.00 WW182 500 LF Well Pointing for Line Work (Per LF of Trench] >18' Depth]j100 LF Min) 512000 $60.000.00 545.00 522.500.00 WW183 5 EA Dewatering for Manhole or Point Repair (0' - 6' Depth) 5750000 53550000 53,024.00 515,120.00 - WW184 6 EA Dewatering for Manhole or Point Repair (6' - 10' Depth)_ 510.000.00 550,000.00 53,049.00 515,245.00 W W 185 5 EA Dewalering for Manhole or Poirn Repair , (10' - 14' Depth) $15,000.00 575,000.00 59,079.00 545,395.00 The highlighted areas indicate an error to an extension which did not affect She low bid. The lotals reflected here are Me Unit Price x Qty. Section 8-2-7 states. The tint' price shall govern over tfrs a mount." 4 1 r5C7 ExHIBIT "C„ Page 5 of 9 Page 6 of 9 iW W 186 10 EA Dewatering for Manhole or Poim Repair [74' - 18' Depth) tF i 520,000.00 5200,000.00 512,098.00 5120,980.00 W W 787 10 EA Dewatering for Manhole or Point Repair (>18' Depth] 525600.00 5250.000.00 515.123.00 $151,230.00 WW188 400 LF Remove & Replace 4' PVC Wastewater Forcemain 540.00 516,000.00 522.00 58,800.00 WW 189 400 LF Remove 8 Replace 6' PVC Wastewater Forcemain 550.00 520600.00 531.00 512,400.00 WW190 400 LF Remove & Replace 6' PVC WaslewalerForcemain 560.00 524,000.00 $38.00 515.20060 WW191 400 LF Remove &Replace 1D' PVC Wastewater ForCemain 570.00 528,000.00 550.00 520,000.00 WW192 400 LF Remove & Replace 12" PVC Wastewater Forcemain $80.00 ti 532,000.00 $67.00 526600.00 lFkf W W 193 400 LF Remove & Replace 18' PVC Wastewater Forcemain 590.00 536,000.00 5190.00 576,000.00 W W 194 400 LE Remove & Replace 20' PVC Wastewater Forcerrtatn 5100.00 540,000.00 5219.00 $87,600.00 WW195 400 LF Remove & Replace 24' PVC Wastewater Forcemain 5120.00 548,000.00 5385.00 $154,000.00 i W W 198 400 LF Trench Safety for Forcemain (All Line Saes & Depths) 51.00 5400.00 5100.00 540,000.00 WW197 10 DAY Control or Wastewater Flows (Bypass of Lines Sr) Complete in Place Per 24 -hour period 51,750.00 5f7 500 OD 51,500.00 515,000.00 WW198 500 LF Bypass Force Main for Control of s8" Wastewater Flows 525.00 512,500.00 518.00 59,000.00 W W 199 10 DAY Conlro2 of Wastewater Flows [Bypass 0110'•12 Lines] Complete in Place Per 24 -hour Period 51,750.00 517,500.00 51,700.00 517,000.00 WW200 500 LF D Force Main for Control of 10" -12 Wastewater Flows 525.00 512,500.00 522.00 511,000.00 .� W W201 10 DAY Control of Wastewater Flows (Bypass of 15' -18' Lines) Complete in Place Per 24 -hour Period $3.000.00 $30.000.00 52,300.00 123,000.00 WW202 500 LF Bypass Force Main for Control of 75' -18' Wastewater Flows $40.00 520,000.00 528.00 514,000.00 W W203 10 DAY Conlrol of Wastewater Flows [Bypass of 24' tines] Complete in Place Per 24 -tour Period 55600.00 550600.0D 53,200.00 132,000.00 WW204 500 LF Bypass Force Main for Control of 24" Wastewater Flows 550.00 525,00060 533.00 516,50400 WW205 10 DAY Control of Wastewater Flows (Bypass of 30- Lines) Complete in Place Per 24 -hour Period 57,500.00 575,000.00 =5.500.00 565,000.00 WW206 500 LF Bypass Force Main for Control of 30" Wastewater Flows $80.00 $30.000.00 538.00 519,000.00 W W20T 1 D DAY Control of Wastewater Flows (Bypass of 3& Lines), Complete in Place Per 24 -hour Period 59,000.00 590,000.00 $7,250.00 572,500.00 WW208 500 LF Bypass Force Main for Control of 36" Wastewater Flows $70.00 535,000.00 $50.00 525,000.00 WW208A 1 EA 4 - Inch Line Stop 53,000.00 $3.000.00 $5,244.00 55,244.00 W W208B 1 EA 6 - Inch Line Slop $5, 000.00 55.000.00 55,848.00 55,848.00 WW208C 1 EA 8 - Inch Line Slop 57.500.00 57,500.00 56.211,00 $6,211.00 WW208D 1 EA 10 - Inch Line Slop 510,000.00 510,000.00 $8,804,00 58.804.00 WW208E 1 EA 12 -inch Line Stop 515.000.00 515,000.00 59,408.00 59,408.00 WW208F 1 EA 18 - Inch Line Stop 520,000.00 120,000.00 524,600.00 524,600,00 W W208G 1 EA 20 - Inch Line Stop 525,000.00 525,000.00 528,000.00 528,000.00 WW208H 1 EA 24 - Inch Line Slop 530,000.00 530,000.00 531,890.00 531,890.00 WW209 10 DAY Furnish Vacuum Truck (Tandem), Per 24 -hour Period 57.500.00 575,000.00 52,500.00 525,000.00 WW210 10 DAY furnish Vacuum Truck (Tanker), Per 24 -hour Period 57.500,00 575,000.00 53,750.00 537,500.00 WW211 1000 IF Clean & CCTV Wastewater lines (Lines 56`) $5.00 $5,000.00 59.00 59,000.00 WW212 1000 LF [lean & CCTV Wastewater Lines (10' -12- Lines) 57.00 17,000.00 59.00 59,000.00 wW213 1000 LF Clean & CCTV Wastewater Lines (1F-1r Lines) $10.00 510,000,00 512.00 512,000.00 WW214 1000 LF Clean & CCTV Wastewater Lines 124" Lines) 512.00 512,000.00 513.00 513,000.00 WW215 1000 LF Clean & CCTV Wastewater Lines (30" Lines) 514.00 514,000.00 514.00 114,000.00 WW216 1000 LF Clean & CCTV Wastewater Lines (38' Lines, 516.00 $16,000.00 514.50 514,500.00 W W217 36 EA CCTV Reverse Set -up [Unable to Traverse Line on Initial Set -up] 51,500.00 515,000.00 $375.00 53,750.00 'The highlighted areas indicate an error in an extension which did not affect the tow bid. The tolals reflected here are the Unit Price x Qly. Section 5 -2 -7 states. 'The unit price shall govern ov4rjlamaunt." EXHIBIT "C" Page 6of9 Page 7 of 9 WW218 25 EA CCTV Sel -ups 5500.00 512.500.00 510000.00 5375.00 1375.00 r 59,375 -00 59,375.00 WW219 25 EA Clean & CCTV Manhole / Manhole Inspection 5100 -00 WW220 100 LF %8' Casing Pipe 180.00 $8,000.00 5210.00 121.000.00 WW221 100 LF 17 Casing Pipe 5100.00 510.000 -00 5260.00 526,000.00 WW222 100 LF 18' Casing Pipe 5130.00 513,000.00 5300.00 530.000.00 WW223 100 LF 24' Casing Pipe 5180.00 518,000.00 5400.00 540.000.00 WW224 100 LF 30' Casing Pipe $200.00 120.000.00 5600.00 560,000.00 WW225 100 LF 36` Casing Pipe 5230.00 523,000.00 1700.00 570,000.00 W W226 40 EA Remove Existing Wastewater Manhole (AD sizes) 51,500.00 560.000.00 58,900.00 5276,000.00 WW227 25 Replace 4 11 D. Wastewater Manhole EA 0%8,l>th] 54,000.00 5100,000.00 19,641.00 1 5241.025.00 WV V228 250 Extra Depth for 4 11 Dia Wastewater Manhole VF Over 6, Depth) 5100.00 525,000.00 1 5448,00 5112,006.00 W W229 10 EA Replace 5 ft Dia Wastewater Manhole 0'43' Depth) $6,000.00 560,000.00 514,102,00 5141,020.00 WW230 100 VF Extra Depth !Ix 5 ft Dia Wastewater Manhole Over 6' Depth) 5175.00 517,500.00 5716.00 171,800.00 W W231 5 EA Replace 611 Dia Wastewater Manhole (0'-6' Depth) 58,000.00 54000.80 521,772.00 5146,880 .00 WW232 75 VF Depth for 6 1 Dia Wastewater Manhole Over 6' Depth) 5225.00 518,675.00 5923 -00 $69.225.00 WW233 10 4 fl Dia Wastewater Manhole Type A Reh Rehab EA 0,,8, Depth} 52, 000.00 520,000.00 56,048.00 t $60,480.00 WW234 100 VF Extra Depth for 4 ft Dia. Wastewater Manhole Type A Rehab (Over 6' Depth) 5275.00 527,500.00 5236.00 523,600.00 WW235 5 5 ft Dia Wastewater Manhole Type A Rehab EP. 0'-6' Depth) 52,750.00 573;750.00 56,048.00 $30,240.00 WW236 50 VF Extra Depth for 5 R Dia. Wastewater Manhole Type A Rehab (Over 6' Depth) 5450.04 522,500.00 $321.00 516,050.00 W W237 5 Die Wastewater Manhole Type A Rehab EA fi R an (0'-6' Deptht 5338000 518 60000 $604800 530,240.00 W W238 75 VF Depth for 6 ft Dia. Wastewater Manhole Type A Rehab (Over 6' Depth) 1545.00 540,875.00 1382.00 528,650.00 ii WW239 10 EA 4 ft Dia Waste Manhole anhote Type B Rehab (0'-6' Depth) 52,600.00 526,000.00 52,601.00 526,010.00 WW240 100 VF Extra Depth for 4 ft Dia. Wastewater Manhole Type B Rehab (Over 6' Depth), $315 -00 531,500.00 $321.00 532,100.00 W W241 5 5 h die Wastewater Manhole Type B Rehab Y-6' Depth] 53,000.00 515,000.00 53,024.00 515,120.00 WW242 50 Extra Depth for 5 ft Dia. Wastewater Manhole Type B VF Rehab (Over 6' Depth) 5450.00 122,500.0D 5453 -00 522,650.00 W W243 5 ater Manhole Type B Rehab EA fi R die Wastewater (W-6' Depth) 53 800.00 519,000.00 53,871.00 519,355.00 WW244 75 VF Extra Depth for 6 11 Dia. Wastewater Manhole Type B Rehab (Over 6' Depth) 5580.00 543,500.00 $567.00 544,025.00 WW245 20 EA 4 11 Dia Wastewater Manhole FRP Rehab (0'-6' Depth) 54.500 -00 590,000.00 $4,450,00 580,000.00 WW246 200 VF Extra Depth for 4 ft Dia. Wastewater Manhole FRP Rehab. (Over 8' Depth) 5300.04 560,000.00 5928.00 5185,600.00 WW247 10 EA 5 ft Dia Wastewater Manhole FRP Rehab (D'-6' Depth) 55,500.00 555,000.00 54,583.00 145,830.00 WW248 100 VF Extra Depth for 5 fl Dia. Wastewater Manhole FRP Rehab. (Over 6' Depth) 5350.00 535,000.00 5209.00 520,900.00 WW249 5 EA 6 R Dia Wastewater Manhole FRP Rehab (0'.-6' Depth) 56,800.00 534,000.00 14,124.00 520,620.00 WW250 75 i Extra Depth 'Or 6 ft Dia. Wastewater Manhole FRP Rehab. (Over 6' Depth) 1540.00 540500 00 1310.00 523,250.00 WW251 25 Excavation Safety for Wastewater Manholes VF (0'- 6'Deplh) $1000 5250.00 ' 1800.00 $20.000.00 - 1 WW252 250 Extra Depth for Excavation Safety for Wastewater EA Manholes (>8' Deplh) $10.00 52 50000 kIk! 1100.00 525,000.00 -, WW253 2000 SY Cut & Restore HMAC Pavement Includes 2' HMAC. 8' Limestone Base & Prime Coal) 560 -0D 1160,000.00 $65.04 5170,000.00 WW253A 2000 Add8onal HMAC Pavement Thickness SY Mir," ner SYl 15.00 !I 510,000.00 ! 55.00 510,000.00 WW253B 2000 SY Addil arty Limestone Base Thickness (1` per SY) r 5200 5400000 $10.00 520.000.00 WW253C 1500 SY Select Backfdl Material 525 -00 $37,500.00 535.00 552500 00 WW253D 250 SY Flowable Backfdl 5150.00 537,500.00 5150.00 537,500.00 'The highlighted areas indicate an error in an extension which did not ailed the low bid. The totals reflected here are the Unit Price x Oiy shall govern amount.` Section B-2 -7 states, "The unit price EXHIBIT "C' Pace 7 of 9 page 8of9 WW254 250 SY 'Cut & Restore Concrete Pavement {Includes 8` Concrete Pavement & 8" Limestone Base) 5100,00 52 5100.00 525,000 -00 W W254A 100 SY Additional Concrete Pavement Thickness (1• per SY) 525.00 52,500.00 510 -00 51,000.00 WW255 10 DAY Signing 8 Traffic Control Complete l [Detail A), Cfele in Place Per 24 -hour Period 5500 -00 55,000.00 5155.00 51,650.00 W W256 10 DAY Signing $ Traffic Control (petal S), Complete in Place Per 24 -hour Period 5500 -W 55000 -00 5251.00 52,550 00 WW257 50 DAY Signing Complete & Control {Dalai C}, Clete 5n Place Per 24 -tour Period 5500.00 55,000.00 $480.00 54,800.00 WW258 10 DAY Signing & Traffic Control [ petal) b}. Complete in Place Per 24 -hour Period $500.Dd $5,000.00 r 5756.00 57,580.00 WW259 10 DAY Signing 8 Traffic Control (Detail E), Complete Place Per 24-hour Period 5500.00 55000.00 517300 51,730.00 WW260 10 DAY Signing $Traffic Control (petal F), Complete in Place Per 24-hour Period 5500.00 55,000.00 5333.00 $3,3351.00 W W261 1 D DAY S�' & Traffic Control {Dalai G}, Complete in Place Per 24 -tour Period 51,000.00 510,000.00 5807.00 56,670.00 W W262 10 DAY Signing & Traffic Control [Dalai N}, Complete in Plate Per 24 -hour Period 51000.00 510,000.00 5394.00 53,940.00 WW263 10 DAY Signing $Traffic Control [petal I], Complete to Place Per 24 -hour Period 51,000.00 510,000.00 5567.00 55,670.00 WW284 10 DAY Signing $Traffic Control (Detail J), Complete in Pixie Per 24 -hour Period 5500.00 55,000.00 5356.00 53,580.00 WW265 10 DAY Signing & Traffic Control {Dotal K}, Complete in Place Per 24 -hour Period 5500 -00 55,000.00 5386.00 58,86000 W W266 10 DAY Signctg $Traffic Control (petal Complete 1), Clete in Place Per 24 -tour Period 550000 55,000.00 5380.00 53,800.00 W W287 1 D DAY Signing & Traffic Control {Dalai fvf], Complete in Place Per 24-hour Period 51,000.00 510,000 -00 5414.00 54,140.00 WW268 10 DAY Signing & Traffic Control (Dolan N), Complete in Place per 24-hour Period 5500,00 55,000.00 5104.00 51,040.00 W W269 10 DAY Flogger, Complete En Place Per 24 -hour Period 5400.00 54,000.00 5600.00 58,000.00 WW270 500 LF Removal & Replacement of Barb -Wire Fencing 120.00 $10000.00 $23.00 511,500.00 WW271 500 LF Removal & Re placement of Chain link Fencing , 540.00 520000 00 $33.00 516,500.00 WW272 500 1 LF Removal & Replacement of Wood Fencing { 550.00 525000.00 540.00 520,000.00 W W273 5 Temporary Construction Entrance/Exit -All Weather Access Road $2,000.00 510,000.00 52,900.00 514,500.00 ' WW274 5 EA Tree Removal {Up to 8" Dia. Trunk} 5250.00 51,250.00 1500.00 52,500.00 WW275 I 5 EA Tree Removal (Greater Than 8' Dia. Trunk} 5500.00 52,500.00 51,000.00 55,000.00 WW276 500 SY ErosionCordml - Sodding $5.00 _ 52,500.00 57.00 53,500.00 WW277 2500 LF Erasion Control - Temporary Sediment Control Fence (Silt Fence and/or 50t Barrier) 52.00 15,000.00 13.75 59,375.00 WW278 50 LF Erosion Control - Baled Hay 510.00 5500.00 55.00 5250,00 WW279 1500 SF Remove and Replace Driveway 515.00 522,500.00 515.00 522,500.00 WW280 3000 SF Remove and Replace Sidewalk 1 512.00 538,000.00 510.00 530.000,00 W W281 1000 LF Remove and Replace Curb and Gutter or Valley Gutter 112.00 512,000.00 535.00 535,000.00 WW282 10 EA Remove and Replace Curb Ramp 51,500.00 515,000.00 53,500.00 535,000.00 WW253 10 EA Remove, Relocate, and Reinstall #fail Box 5300.00 53,000.00 5500.00 55,000.00 WW284 2 AC Site Clearing and Stripping 54,000.00 58,000.00 55,500,00 511,000.00 WW285 1 LS Unanticipated Utility Relocation Allowance 525 .000.00 125,000.00 525,000.00 525,000.00 Total Extended Una Prices (Items WW1 lhru WW285) 56,452,450.00 510,393,485.00 'The highlighted areas indicate an error in an extension which did not effect the low bid. The total's reflected here ere the Unit Price x Oty. Section 5-2-7 states, The unit price shall govern war Ur a mourn." EXHIBIT "C" PauC$of9 Emergency Coefficient ( %) (To be applied to any and all items associated with an Emergency Delivery Order as defined in the Special Provisions) Emergency Scenario (Hypothetical Delivery Order) Pricing SO W.R.P. SERVICE AREA COLLECTION SYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM 1010 CONTRACT PROJECT N0.7410 OTY 510 ITEM (Bid Evaluation UNIT NO. , ONLY - NOT FOR AWARD) WW1 WW84 WW85 WW124 WW133 WW1728 WW197 WW198 W W228 WW227 WW228 WW251 WW252 WW253 WW268 400 400 14 15 15 2 LS LF LF EA LF LF DAY DESCRIPTION MobiaaitonlBondsllnsuranCe Rehab 8' Wastewater Line (Cured -in -Place -Pipe) (0'- 8'Depth) Rehab a` Wastewater Line (Cured- krPlace -Pipe) p - 10' Depth) 800 3 3 2 3 2 41.6 10 LF EA EA VF VF EA SY DAY Service Re- connection for e` CIPP Wastewater Line Point Repair SS' Wastewater Late (6'- 10' Depth) (15 LF Min) Excavation Safety for Wastewater Line Point Repair (8' - 10' Depth) Control of Wastewater Flows (Bypass of Lines s8') Complete in Place Per 24 -hour Period Bypass Force Main for Control of s8' Wastewater Flows Remove Existing Wastewater Manhole (All sizes) Replace 4 ft Dia. Wastewater Manhole ,(0' -6' Depth) 50.00% Huff d MltchelI Inc. 13626 !Mudge C area. TX_77429 Page 9 of 9 50.00% TOTAL. COST UNIT PRICE (QTY x UNIT PRICE) 111,285.00 540.00 141.00 5150.00 1200.00 515.00 11,750.00 511,286.00 516,000.00 516,400.00 52,100.00 53,000.00 5225.00 53,500.00 Jhabores Conti Co. Inc. 6349 Leopard CoroutCh1tjjc1X 78468 TOTAL COST UNIT PRICE (QTY x UNIT PRICE) 518.500,00 180.00 150.00 191.00 5480.00 110.00 11,500.00 518,500.00 524,000.00 524,000.00 11,274.00 16,900.00 5150.00 53,000.00 Extra Depth for 4 ft Dia Wastewater Manhole (Over B' Depth) Excavation Safety for Wastewater Manholes (0' - B' Depth) Extra Depth for Excavation Safety for Wastewater Manholes (,6' Depth} Cut & Restore HMAC Pavement (Includes 7 HMAC, 8' Limestone Base & Prime Coat) Signing & Traffic Controt (Doha N), Complete in Place Per 24 -hour PgriQd Sub -Total Hypothetical Scenario No.1 Emergency Coefficient Emergency Scenario (Hypothetical Delivery Order) Pricing 525.00 51,500.00 14,000.00 $100,00 $10.00 110.00 580.00 5500.00 120,000.00 14,500.00 512,000.00 5200.00 530.00 120.00 13,328.00 55,000.00 197,589.90 50.00% $ 146,383.50 118.00 $5,900.00 19,641.00 1448.00 $900.00 1100.00 585.00 1104.00 114,400.00 520,700.00 128,823.00 5898.00 52,400.00 i 5200.00 13,536.[0 51,040.00 1149,919.90 50.00% S. 224,878.58 Total Extended Unit Prices (Items WW1 thru W W285) . 16,452,450,09 110,3930465,00 Sub -Total Hypothetical Scenario No.1 : 1146,383.59 1224,878.50 Total Base Bid : $6,598,833.50 510,518,343.50 'The highlrghted areas indicate an error in an extension which did not affect the Iow bid. The totals reflected here are the Unit Price x Qty. Section B -2 -7 states, 'The unit price shall govern over the amount.' -419- EXHIBIT "C" Page 9 of 9 PROJECT BUDGET OSO WATER RECLAMATION PLANT SERVICE AREA COLLECTION SYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) PROGRAM (Project No. 7410) July 20, 2010 FUNDS AVAILABLE: Wastewater CIP.. $2,500,000.00 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction (Huff and Mitchell, Inc.) (Base Bid) $1,500,000.00 Contingencies 150,000.00 Consultant Fees: Consultant - (LNV Engineering) 274,440.00 Testing - (Geotechnical & Material Testing) 30,000.00 Reimbursements: Contract Administration (Contract Preparation /Award /Admin) 41,250.00 Engineering Services (Project MgtlConstr Mgt/Traffic Mgt) 52,500.00 Construction Observation Services (not included in Consultant Services) 52,500.00 Finance issuance 18,750.00 Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 7,500.00 Total $2,126,940.00 H:WOMEWVeknaP%GEMWASTEWATER174W OSO WRP SERVICE AREA IDIQ CONSTRUCTrIA neeT BUDGET EXHIBIT "D" Page 1 of 1 /Mproject\councilexhibits \ exh741 Ob. dwg HVY CORPUS cIPMs7t zay OSO WATER RECLAMAI7ON PLANT ■ NAS FM 2444 PROJECT #7410 0 LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE j L?1.rj1LN .7yL 4V E EXHIBIT "E" OSO WATER RECLAMATION PLANT SERVICE AREA COLLECTION SYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM IDIQ CONTRACT _421— CITY COUNCIL man - CRY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES PAGE: T of 1 DATE: 07/27/2010 IMF in 28 AGENDA MEMORANDUM July 20, 2010 SUBJECT: Energy Efficiency Conservation and Sustainability (Project No. 4391) AGENDA ITEM: a. Ordinance Appropriating $2,507,500 From a Department of Energy Grant in the 1071 Community Enrichment Grants Fund for Development of an Energy Efficiency Conservation Strategy and Community Sustainability Plan; and Declaring and Emergency. b. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a Professional Services contract in the amount of $1,471,000 with HDR Engineering of Corpus Christi, Texas for preparation and implementation of the Energy Efficiency Conservation Strategy and Community Sustainability Plan. (Project No. 4391) ISSUES: Council must appropriate funds prior to expenditure. Council must authorize the execution of the contracts in excess of $50,000.00. FUNDING: Funding is available from the Grant Fund upon appropriation. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the ordinance and motion as presented. OF— Director ❑ Engineering Se ices- 361-826-3781 petea n Ca�cctexas. com ADDITIONAL SUPPORT MATERIAL Exhibit A. Background Information Exhibit A -1 Previous Actions Exhibit B Contract Summary H:1H0MEU{E VI N51 GEN1 EnergyEfrieiencyGranMEAwdMemoirryplepaentation .doc Page 1 of 1 PREVIOUS ACTIONS PRIOR COUNCIL ACTIONS: October 13, 2009 — a. Ordinance appropriating $250,000 from a Department of Energy Grant in the Fund 1071 Community Enrichment Grants Fund for development of an Energy Efficiency Conservation Strategy and Community Sustainability Plan increasing appropriations; and declaring an emergency (Ordinance No. 0283490). b. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 1 in the amount of $200,000 for a restated not to exceed fee of $250,000 to the Professional Services Agreement with HDR Engineering of Corpus Christi, Texas for preparation of an Energy Efficiency Conservation Strategy and Community Sustainability Plan to satisfy Department of Energy requirements for the City of Corpus Christi to receive an Energy Efficiency Conservation Block Grant (Motion No. 2009 -292). PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS: June 17, 2009 — Administrative execution of an agreement with HDR Engineering, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $50,000.00 to undertake Task Order 1 of the Development of an Energy Efficiency Conservation Plan and Initial Strategy for a City - Wide Sustainability Plan. Exhibit A -1 Page 1 of 1 H. IHOMEI KEVINS1GEN1EnergyEfficiencyGrantlAEAwdlmplem4r ionPriorActionsExhA -1.doc CONTRACT SUMMARY ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM — PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION, PROJECT NO. 4391 A. Conduct Energy Audits and Retrofits of Municipal Buildings and Select Facilities/Infrastructure General Approach The NE will develop and implement a procurement process to select one or more Energy Service Companies (ESCO) for the purpose of identifying (through an energy audit) and then implementing energy conservation measures (ECMs). AIE will also assist with management and oversight of the ESCO program, including input on the monitoring, verification and reporting as it relates to EECBG requirements and the City's overall EECBG program. Tasks 1. Project Management • Meet with the City of Corpus Christi (City) to obtain necessary information and establish project schedule; one (1) meeting has been assumed for budget purposes • Provide weekly update to the City regarding the status of the project and tasks completed • Prepare and submit monthly invoices • Quality control reviews 2. Develop an RFP and select one or more Energy Service Companies (ESCO) to conduct energy audits and identify and implement ECMs • Conduct meeting with City staff to define goals and requirements for work to be performed by ESCO (to be included in RFP) • Develop draft RFP and submit to City for review and comments • Develop final RFP and submit to City • Assist City in publication /advertisement of RFP 3. Assist with proposal review, ranking and recommendation of ESCO(s) • Assist City in review proposals received and rank applicants • Conduct one follow -up workshop with City staff to summarize applications and discuss ranking and selection 4. Assist with negotiation of scope and contract terms for Energy Service Performance Contract (ESPC) • Use baseline data collected during the development of the City's EECS to assist the City in prioritizing the buildings, facilities, and infrastructure (e.g. street lights) for audits and retrofits. • Develop language for scope, schedule and contract terms and conditions to be included in ESCO performance contract with the City • Plan and host one scoping workshop with selected ESCO and City staff to: • share baseline energy data collected during EELS development • recommend /discuss /select priority buildings/facilities for audit and retrofit (minimum 5 buildings/facilities) • outline requirements for EECBG reporting including detailed summation of DOE metrics and monitoring requirements to ESCO —427— EXHIBIT "B" Page 1 of 10 • establish protocols for collection of monitoring data for inclusion in quarterly and annual reports • Assist in negotiation of contract with ESCO, via one initial meeting with ESCO and City, and supplemental electronic /telephone communication • Prepare letter of recommendation for contract award 5. Manage the overall Energy Service Performance Contract (ESPC) process, including input to the terms of the monitoring, verification and reporting components of the energy performance contract to be consistent with EECBG reporting, once an ESCO has been selected. • Provide on -going oversight of: a. implementation of audits and retrofits b. monitoring /data collection by ESCO to satisfy DOE requirements • Plan and host one post -audit workshop with ESCO and City staff to: a. present (ESCO) audit findings b. recommend priority retrofits for approval by City staff Coordinate implementation of retrofits 6. Work with the City to develop strategies by which to capitalize on retrofits as staff training and public education/outreach opportunities. • Once retrofits have been identified and/or are underway, conduct one meeting with ESCO and City staff to identify internal and public education /outreach opportunities • Develop a report of recommended strategies (to be delivered to City) to be used in deriving training /education /outreach benefit from retrofits being implemented 13. Develop a Strategic Implementation Plan for Energy Efficient Improvements for the Water and Wastewater Departments General Project Approach A/E will develop a detailed plan for phased implementation of priority energy saving improvements at both water and wastewater facilities. Six wastewater treatment plants, 10 wastewater lift stations, one water treatment plant and four water storage pump stations will be evaluated. A key part of our energy audits is thorough analysis of the effects of overdesign on energy efficiency. Plants are designed to perform at maximum flow and loading conditions. Unfortunately, most plants are not efficient at average conditions. Our philosophy of identifying efficient operation at average conditions is especially important, particularly for aeration facilities, which could be the largest energy consumer at the plant. We will look at ideas that will incorporate flexibility into the design so that your facility will use as little energy as possible. We will be carrying this "efficient at average conditions" theme into your existing facility as we conduct the audit there. Tasks 1. Project Management • Meet with the City of Corpus Christi (City) to obtain necessary information and establish project schedule; one (1) meeting has been assumed for budget purposes • Provide weekly update to the City regarding the status of the project and tasks completed • Prepare and submit monthly invoices • Quality control reviews 2. Energy Consumption Inventory —428— EXHIBIT "B" - Page 2of1O A/E will prepare an inventory of energy uses by facility including master list of electric motors that will be organized by process and will include such information as type of service, number of operating units, unit horsepower, percentage of time utilized, and estimated power consumption. 3. Collect and Review Data A/E will review energy summaries for each facility. Data needed includes flows, kWh, therms, billing demand, and energy cost for two years from each facility. Pump or blower curves for key equipment are desirable. We will need the assistance from City staff in obtaining his information. Ideally, we would like this information at least one week before A/E visits the site to conduct field work. 4. Kick -off Meeting - This meeting will allow NE and City staff to review the plan for field work and subsequent activities. Topics to be discussed during this meeting include: • Electrical and cost data. • Field activities. • Schedule. • Lines of communication. • Introduction of project by City staff. • City engineering and operations and maintenance (O &M) input on the project. • Energy - related items that are `off limits" during investigations. • Energy - related items or ideas that the City wants NE to further investigate. 5. Field Investigations Following the kick -off meeting, A/E will Conduct on -site facilities investigation of up to 6 wastewater treatment plants, 10 wastewater lift stations, 1 water treatment plant, and 4 water storage/pump stations (over a multi -day period). Special emphasis will be placed on operational changes and low cost changes. Energy ideas that require more expensive retrofits will also be investigated. We anticipate that the field work can begin on the same day as the kick -off meeting (Task 2). 6. Workshop Based on field work, NE will develop ECMs and discuss them with staff in the relevant departments. A/E will use a Total Quality Management (TQM) format to solicit additional ideas from staff. ECMs will be reviewed and prioritized. Cost, savings, simple payback, and affect on operations will be discussed. Impractical ECMs will then be eliminated. 7. Preparation of ECMs Based on discussions with your staff, a review of data, and data gathered during facilities audits, A/E will prepare ECMs. The ECMs could include drive modifications, operational and process changes, and pump modifications. We will discuss all ideas and recommendations with City staff prior to submitting a draft report. ECMs will include the energy conservation ideas, estimated construction cost, operational impacts, and simple payback. 8. Draft strategic implementation plan for energy efficient improvements A/E will prepare a draft strategic implementation plan for energy efficient improvements will be prepared based on findings from facilities audits and the prioritization of ECMs during the workshop with staff. 9. Conference CaII A/E will conduct a conference call with staff to discuss the draft report. 10. Final strategic implementation plan for energy efficient improvements A/E will generate a comprehensive, phased strategic implementation plan for energy efficient improvements that reflects staffs feedback on the draft implementation plan. -429- EXHIBIT "B" Page 3 of 10 C. Traffic Signal Timing and Coordination — Not Authorized Finalization of the approved list of intersections is required. The AIE will not proceed until the final list of intersections is approved. The A!E will proceed only being authorized in writing by the City Engineer or his designee. General Approach AIE will develop and assist in implementing signal timing and coordination of approximately 60% of the City's traffic signals (approximately 150 intersections) operated by the City of Corpus Christi. The intersections and corridors to be included are outlined on the attached Exhibit A -1, but pending final approval. The goal will be to optimize the signal timing to provide efficient traffic progression along the major arterials during the AM and PM peak periods. The optimized signal timing will be implemented in the field with the help of City signal technician staff. Tasks 1. Project Management • Meet with the City of Corpus Christi (City) to obtain necessary information and establish project schedule; one (1) meeting has been assumed for budget purposes • Provide weekly update to the City regarding the status of the project and tasks completed • Prepare and submit monthly invoices • Quality control reviews 2. Data Collection • Obtain AM (7:00 to 9:00 AM) and PM (4:00 to 6:00 PM) peak period turning movement counts at 150 intersections. • Obtain travel time runs during the AM (7:00 to 9:00 AM) and PM (4:00 to 6:00 PM) peak periods to document existing travel time for each of the corridors. • Obtain intersection figures to illustrate intersection geometry and existing signal information. • Obtain pictures of all approaches at intersections. • Coordinate with City and TxDOT to obtain existing signal timing information. • Review signal timing information data provided by City/TxDOT. • Meet with City and TxDOT to discuss signal timing data and clarify any questions. One (1) meeting has been assumed for budget purposes. During this meeting the City'srTxDOT's preference for critical signal timing parameters (such as minimum green time, yellow time, red time, etc.) will be obtained. • Review and summarize traffic count data in an excel spreadsheet for each corridor. • Conduct extensive field work at each of the 20 corridors to evaluate existing traffic operations, existing signal timing, verify intersection geometry, and any other features that would effect traffic signal operations. 3. Signal Timing Optimization • Develop existing traffic models for each corridor for AM and PM peak hour conditions. This will involve setting up the roadway network and inputting the traffic volume and signal timing data. Synchro 7 a macro simulation model will be used for developing the optimized signal timing plans. • Perform capacity analysis and calibrate the existing traffic model for the AM and PM peak hour conditions to reflect existing traffic conditions. —430— EXHIBIT "B" Page 4 of 10 • Summarize results of existing condition analysis. The Measure of Effectiveness (MOE's) will include intersection level of service (LOS), existing band width, travel time runs, and network wide delay. • Based on all comments received from City/TxDOT, develop optimized signal timing plans for each corridor for the AM and PM peak periods. • Summarize results of the study in a draft technical memorandum and submit for City's review. • Meet with City to discuss results of the study. Ten (10) meetings are assumed for budget purposes assuming that two corridors will be discussed at each meeting. • Coordinate to obtain comments from the City/TxDOT. • Finalize the technical memorandum incorporating all comments received from the City/TxDOT. Assuming 20 corridors, there will be a total of 20 technical memorandum's summarizing the results of the study. 4. Signal Timing Implementation • Meet with City signal technician staff to discuss format for signal timing implementation and schedule for implementation. One (1) meeting has been assumed for budget purposes. . • Obtain a format from the City for presentation of the optimized signal timing data. • Summarize AM and PM peak hour optimized signal timing data for each corridor using the same format provided by the City for easy input into the controller systems. • Submit signal timing information to the City for implementation in the controller. D. Conversion of Fleet Vehicles to Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) General Approach The majority of this work will be accomplished by other entities. As detailed in Task I, The NE will assist with oversight, monitoring, and reporting. E. Assist in establishing a rebate or voucher program for purchase of High Efficiency Toilets (HETs) General Approach The NE will assist the City in the administration, operation, and marketing of the City's HET Rebate Program. Tasks 1. Project Management • Meet with the City of Corpus Christi (City) to obtain necessary information and establish project schedule; one (1) meeting has been assumed for budget purposes • Provide weekly update to the City regarding the status of the project and tasks completed • Prepare and submit monthly invoices • Quality control reviews 2. Program Planning and Development • Identify available models and resources for HET Rebate program creation, implementation, and administration • Plan and conduct up to 6 meetings with City staff to: a. define preferred model for program structure b. establish operating protocols for long -term program administration • Provide on -call support during program implementation —431— EXHIBIT "B" Page 5 of 10 3. Program Marketing Assistance • Assist staff in creating marketing strategy for rebate program • Generate the content for marketing materials (to be produced/distributed by the City) F. Expand Existing Incentive Program for Residential Construction Using Natural Gas General Approach The majority of this work will be accomplished by other entities. As detailed in Task I, The A/E will assist with oversight, monitoring, and reporting. G. Purchase Equipment to Use of Compressed Nitrogen to Fill Fleet Vehicle Tires General Approach The majority of this work will be accomplished by other entities. As detailed in Task I, The NE will assist with oversight, monitoring, and reporting. H. Create an Integrated Community Sustainability Plan & Implementation Program General Approach The NE will develop a comprehensive integrated community sustainability plan and implementation program that focuses on three main areas: downtown redevelopment, multi -modal transportation planning, and improvement of the City's planning and development codes. Tasks 1. Project Management • Meet with the City of Corpus Christi (City) to obtain necessary information and establish project schedule; one (1) meeting has been assumed for budget purposes • Provide weekly update to the City regarding the status of the project and tasks completed • Prepare and submit monthly invoices • Quality control reviews 2. Kick -Off Workshop • Review efforts completed in EELS development • Define Overall Project Goals • Define Overall Project Schedule ❑ Key Meetings ❑ Key Deliverables • Define Steering Committee • Define Stakeholder Committee • Define Public Outreach Program • Review/Tour Key Sites 3. Data Collection (Quantitative) ▪ Elements o Air /Climate ❑ Community Form ❑ Culture ❑ Economy ❑ Energy ❑ Environment o Facilities o land Use -432- EXHIBIT "B" - Page 6of10 o Mobility o Sustenance o Waste o Water • Data Sources • Metrics • Current Conditions • Changes Over Time 4. Data Mapping (Quantitative) • Generalized Data • Specific Data • GIS Layers • Current Conditions • Changes Over Time 5. Data Analysis (Quantitative) • Individual Elements o Internal Analysis • Changes Over Time o External Analysis • Comparables • National Averages • Case Examples • Overlapping Elements o Internal Analysis • Changes Over Time o External Analysis • Comparables • National Averages • Case Examples 6. Data Summary (Quantitative) • Current Conditions —12 Elements o Comparables o National Averages a Case Examples • Carrying Capacity —12 Elements 7. Data Collection (Qualitative) • Client Meetings — one group meeting, up to eight (8) individual half -hour interviews • Steering Committee Interviews — one group meeting, up to sixteen (16) individual half -hour interviews • Stakeholder Interviews — one group meeting, up to eight (8) 50- minute small group meetings • Community Outreach o Round Tables — up to eight (8) one -hour round table discussions with selected community representatives o Surveys o Web -Based Data Collection • Visioning Workshops o Steering Committee — one, two -hour workshop o Stakeholders — one, two -hour workshop -433- EXHIBIT "B" Page 7 of 10 o Community — one, three -hour workshop • Mapping Exercises — associated with Visioning Workshops 8. Data Analysis (Qualitative) • Compilation o Interviews o Round Tables o Surveys o Web -Based Materials o Visioning Workshops o Mapping Exercises • Assessment • Summary Document 9. Vision • Qualitative and Quantitative Data Overlays • Presentations o Client — one two -hour meeting o Steering Committee — one, two -hour meeting o Stakeholders — one, two -hour meeting • At Client's discretion, Steering Committee and Stakeholder meetings can be combined a General Public — one, two -hour meeting 10. Back - casting • Compare Vision with Quantitative Data Summary • Project Time Frames (5, 10, 20, 50, 100 years) • Backcast • Establish Planning Program 11. Planning Process • Review Planning Program • Charrette Preparation • Planning & Design Charrette • Charrette Document • Presentation a Clients o Steering Committee o Stakeholders 12. Plan Draft • Test Draft Plan Results o Plan in General ❑ 12 Elements o Interactions Among Elements • Revise Plan o Preliminary Policies • Implementation • Funding • Time Frame ❑ Preliminary Programs • Implementation • Funding • Time Frame o Preliminary Projects —434— EXHIBIT "B" Page 8 of 10 • Implementation • Funding • Time Frame o Preliminary Implementation Matrix • Presentations o Client o Steering Committee o Stakeholders 13. Final Plan • Prepare Final Plan • Prepare Final implementation Matrix • Presentations o Client o Steering Committee o Stakeholders o General Public 1. Perform necessary oversight, monitoring and reporting in accordance with DOE Guidelines General Approach AIE will assist the City in establishing metrics, monitoring and reporting for the implementation of all projects in the City's EECBG Program. Efforts and deliverables will be in compliance with the EECBG monitoring and reporting requirements, as defined in the Federal Assistance Reporting Checklist, DOE F 4600.2. Tasks 1. Define metrics /establish data collection protocols • Review Department of Energy (DOE) and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) metrics and data reporting requirements for each project activity category; establish minimum reporting requirements for each of 8 EECBG projects • Plan and host 1 kickoff workshop wf City Points of Contact (POCs) to: a. Review required metrics to be reported to DOE for each of 8 EECBG projects b. Define supplemental metrics c. Establish protocols for data collection and delivery to central POC (for delivery to DOE) • Work with central POC to development of monitoring data collection tools and templates to be used by project leads in respective departments 2. Provide long -term oversight and ongoing coordination • Plan and host quarterly data delivery meeting with POCs for each (active) project and with central POC responsible for reporting to DOE and OMB for full term of grant period • Provide on -call support for City POCs in implementing monitoring protocols 3. Project monitoring • Collect and summarize information on funds spent and projected remaining expenditures for each of the eight EECBG projects quarterly for the grant period (up to three years) • Calculate projected energy savings and summarize savings to date for each of the eight EECBG projects quarterly for the grant period (up to three years) —435— EXHIBIT "B" Page 9 of 10 • Collect and summarize information on funds spent and projected remaining expenditures for the overall EECBG program annually for the grant period (up to three years) • Calculate projected energy savings and summarize savings to date for the overall EECBG program annually for the grant period (up to three years) 4. EECBG Reporting • Prepare and submit, for the grant period (up to three years, 4 summaries for 3 years = 12 total), the requisite quarterly performance reports to DOE • Prepare and submit, for the grant period (up to three years, 4 summaries for 3 years = 12 total), the requisite quarterly reports to OMB • Prepare and submit, for the grant period (up to three years, 4 summaries for 3 years = 12 total), the requisite financial reports (SF -425) to DOE I. FEES Summary of Fees —436— EXHIBIT "B" Page 10 of 10 Fee for Basic Services A Conduct energy audits of municipal buildings and facilities to identify and implement priority improvements 12Q000.00 B Develop a Strategic Implementation Plan for Energy Efficient Improvements for the Water and Wastewater Departments 171,000.00 C Traffic Signal Timing and Coordination (Not Authorized - finalization of intersection list and issuance of notice to proceed required.) 450,000.00 ❑ Establish a Rebate Program for Purchase of High Efficiency Toilets 25,000.00 E Expand CNG fueling infrastructure 0.00 F Expand Existing Incentive Program for Residential Construction Using Natural Gas 0.00 G Purchase Equipment to Use of Compressed Nitrogen to Fleet Vehicle Tires 0.00 H Create an Integrated Community Sustainability Plan & Implementation Program 635,000.00 I Perform necessary oversight, monitoring and reporting in accordance with DOE Guidelines. 70,000.00 Total Fee $1,471,000.00 —436— EXHIBIT "B" Page 10 of 10 Page 1 of 2 ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $2,507,500 FROM A DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY GRANT IN THE 1071 COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT GRANTS FUND FOR DEVELOPMENT OF AN ENERGY EFFICIENCY CONSERVATION STRATEGY AND COMMUNITY SUSTAINABILITY PLAN; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. An amount of $2,507,500 from a Department of Energy Grant in the 1071 Community Enrichment Grants Fund is appropriated for development of an Energy Efficiency Conservation Strategy and Community Sustainability Plan. SECTION 2. Upon written request of the Mayor or five Council members, copy attached, the City Council (1) finds and declares an emergency due to the need for immediate action necessary for the efficient and effective administration of City affairs and (2) suspends the Charter rule that requires consideration of and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings so that this ordinance is passed and takes effect upon first reading as an emergency measure on this the 20th day of July, 2010. ATTEST: Armando Chapa City Secretary A ROVED ASS,TO CORM: 08 -Jul -10 Veronica Ocanas Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney 072010 ORD App $2,507,500 for Energy Efficiency Pion —437— CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Joe Adame Mayor Page 2 of 2 Corpus Christi, Texas day of , 2010 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Corpus Christi, Texas For the reasons set forth in the emergency clause of the foregoing ordinance an emergency exists requiring suspension of the Charter rule as to consideration and voting upon ordinances at two regular meetings: l /we, therefore, request that you suspend said Charter rule and pass this ordinance finally on the date it is introduced, or at the present meeting of the City Council. Respectfully, Respectfully, Joe Adame Mayor The above ordinance was passed by the following vote: Joe Adame Chris N. Adler Brent Chesney Larry R. Elizondo, Sr. Kevin Kieschnick Priscilla Leal John E. Marez Nelda Martinez Mark Scott 072010 ORD App $2,507,500 for Energy Efficiency Mari 38_ 29 Requested Council Date: 7/20/10 Alternate Date: 7/27110 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM RECOMMENDATION: Motion approving the purchase of ten (10) pickup trucks, ten (10) light duty pickup trucks, four (4) heavy duty vans, two (2) medium duty trucks and the installation of dedicated CNG Fuel System Conversion on ten (10) vehicles from the following companies for the following amounts in accordance with Bid Invitation No. B1- 0145 -10, based on low bid, best bid and low bid meeting specifications for a total amount of $800,752.75. These vehicles will be used by the Gas, Water and Wastewater Department. Twenty -three (23) vehicles are replacement units and three (3) units are additions to the fleet. Funding for the purchase of vehicles is available in the Water Fund, Community Enrichment Grant Fund No. 1071 and the Capital Outlay budget of the Maintenance Services Fund. Westway Ford Irving, Tx Line Item: 1, 2, 3, & 8 $244,688.00 Holiday Ford Whitesboro, Tx Line Items: 5, 9, & 11 $167,555.75 Champion Ford Corpus Christi, Tx Line Item: 4, 6, 7, & 10 $253,509.00 Access Ford Corpus Christi,Tx Line Items: 12 $135,000.00 Grand Total: $800,752.75 ************************************************ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** BACKGROUND: Purpose: Bid Invitations Issued: Bids Received: Basis of Award: Price Comparison: The vehicles will be used by the Gas, Water and Wastewater Departments in the day to day operations of the respective departments. Twenty -three (23) vehicles are replacement units and three (3) are additions to the fleet. Replaced units will be disposed of through standard disposal of surplus property procedures, including live auctions and/or electronic auctions. Nine Eight Low Bid — Line Items 1 -6, 8 -11 Best Bid Line Item 7 No bids received met all aspects of specification requirements. The evaluation factors included with the bid invitation allows the City to accept an alternate bid when most advantageous to the City. The alternate bid submitted by Champion Ford best meets the requirements of the City. Low Bid Meeting Specifications -- Line Items 12 Clean Fuel Conversions, Austin, Texas and Caldwell Country Chevrolet, Caldwell, Texas submitted the first and second low bid for line item 12. However, their offer's do not meet the bid specification requirement regarding bidder to have a local facility and a CNG certified mechanic in Corpus Christi. Compared to the like items purchased last fiscal year, pricing has increased approximately 13 %. —441— Funding: Water Department — 1 vehicle 550020 -4010 -30250 Capital Outlay Item No.: A31 a Bid Items No.: 7 Requested Council Date: 7/20/10 Alternate Date: 7/27/10 $31,240.00 Maintenance Services — 25 vehicles 550020- 5110 -40120 Capital Outlay Item No's.: A31, A32, A32a, $634,512.75 A33, A33b, A33c, A34, A35, A36, A37, A38, A39, A40, A41, A42, A51a, A51b, A54, A55 A56, A57, A58, A65, A74, A81 Bid Items No's: 1 -11 Community Enrichment Grant Fund 550020 - 1071 -00000- 846005 CNG Fuel System Conversions Bid Item No.: 12 Michas' B : era Assistant Director of Financial Services 826 -3169 mikeb(cctexas.com $135,000.00 TOTAL PURCHASE: $800,752.75 nrm aim O 6 (■ N 9 pn J- ilif pg w ag N e: Es Mg iF 3 n n2 Malwom gn• r i�nn• ■ • x S °r ° • Stn 1 RR :1! $ 'Ix fi 0 Ixa at mY & QVn 08 a N WE 1P x 9m ax 6- 8 53 8 m ffir fka gx V } 3' m O m y 511' 3 i i i ll#W f !I I n n l iii Rid # #o$m$ yN � � � � m c c pNp W W N m � o ° N y z O� V V - �nu m -' P P O O C C m z a [ [Wn Y m N N N Y N cmNii q N N N ? ?..7 yW � f f i 'Allen Samuels ChevroIel Corpus Chnstl, Texas —443— mo m to G7Dz, g CLCf7 Q C) y co -CO Z a� MO rill r m { a° o o 0 30 AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: July 20, 2010 SUBJECT: Police Vehicle Impound Facility, Phase 1 (BOND ISSUE 2008) Project No. 5249 / CIP No. PH 07 AGENDA ITEM: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a construction contract with Bay, Ltd. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $2,107,855.57 for Police Vehicle Impound Facility, Phase 1 for the Total Base Bid plus Additive Alternate Nos. 1, 3 & 4. (BOND ISSUE 2008) ISSUE: This project was approved by voters November 4, 2008 in the Bond Issue 2008 Package under Proposition No. 3 Police Department Improvements. A construction contract is required to complete the project; and requires City Council approval. The Consultant, Freese and Nichols, Inc. was initially selected for this project through Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2008 -05 Bond Issue 2008 and Other Projects. FUNDING: Funding is available from Bond Issue 2008 Police Department Improvements, Storm Water, Water and Wastewater Capital Improvement Budget FY 2010. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. Pete Anaya, P.E. Director of Engineering Services 361 -826 -3781 peteanecctexas.com Additional Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Support Material: Background Information Prior Actions Bid Tabulation Project Budget Location Map H:IHOMEHCeIlyO1GENTOL[CE & FIRE\POUCE15219- Police Vrtick Impound FacOity. Pkr4 4ErtID 2W81 \2 AGENDA MEMD.doc AGENDA BACKGROUND INFORMATION SUBJECT: Police Vehicle Impound Facility, Phase 1 (BOND ISSUE 2008) Project No. 52491 C1P No. PH 07 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The current Police Vehicle Impound Lot (5 acres) is unable to meet the City's current needs. Numerous abandoned vehicles remain on the streets as there is no available room. As a result of the City Council decision to begin towing vehicles involved in accidents with no insurance, the number of vehicles will double (bases on other cities' experience). The new impound facility will be 15 acres centrally located. The acreage will provide for an auction staging area as well as future expansion. This project will accommodate the generation of additional revenues for the General Fund resulting from proposed additional acreage and improvements allowing for increased vehicle tows. The project was developed with a Total Base Bid for Parts A, 8, C and D with five Additive Alternates (Parts E, F, 0, H and 1 respectively). The project consists of (including Additive Alternates) approximately 48,325 square yards of 2- course surface treatment paving, 50,216 square yards of base, geogrid and subgrade improvements, area lighting, 2,778 linear feet of security fencing, automated access gates, and a pre- manufactured modular building, along with 1,789 linear feet of storm water drainage ditch improvements, 1,397 linear feet of waterline improvements and 981 linear feet of sanitary sewer improvements. • Part A provides for paving, area lighting, installation of an 8' chain link high security fence, installation of a perimeter security system, automated access gates, carport for drop offs, pre - manufactured modular building, signs and markings and landscaping. • Part B provides for storm water drainage improvements • Part C provides for water distribution improvements • Part ❑ provides for sanitary sewer (wastewater) improvements. • Additive Alternate No. 1 (Part E) provides for the reconstruction of Hala Pit Road • Additive Alternate No. 2 (Part F) provides for constructing transition ramps of recycled asphalt • Additive Alternate No. 3 (Part G) provides for improvements to the auction site • Additive Alternate No. 4 (Part H) provides for the paving of the auction site • Additive Alternate No. 5 (Part I) provides for the construction of a storm water maintenance ramp The pre- manufactured building for administrative use will be constructed under a separate contract and design will be completed in- house. It will bid separately and will be brought to City Council for approval. Construction of the storm water maintenance ramp will be considered in the future as funding becomes available and need dictates. H:IHOMEISCellyO\GENTO10E & PIRE1POi]CE16249- Police Vehicle impound Faepiry.l , 4(a7D 20i)8)LCoc roctionU AGENDA BACKGROLJND.doc CONTRACT TERMS: The project is estimated to require 150 calendar days, with completion anticipated in February 2011. BID INFORMATION: On June 30, 2010, the City received proposals from eight (8) bidders (see Exhibit "C" Tabulation of Bids). The bids range from $1,666,141.27 to $3,186,071.63 for the Total Base Bid Parts A, B, C and D. The estimated cost of construction is $2,128,831.00 for the Total Base Bid. The City's consultant, Freese and Nichols, Inc. and City staff recommend a contract be awarded to Bay, Ltd. in the amount of $2,107,855.57 for Police Vehicle Impound Facility, Phase 1 for the Total Base Bid Parts A, B, C and D plus Additive Altemate Nos. 1, 3 & 4. PROJECT BACKGROUND: Voters in Bond Issue 2008 approved $2,700,000 dollars to construct a new Vehicle Impound Lot. The Police Vehicle Impound Facility, Phase 1 project was approved November 4, 2008 in the Bond Issue 2008 Package under Proposition No. 3 Police Department Improvements. On Tuesday, November 4, 2008, the City of Corpus Christi held an election to consider a number of ballot propositions to fund major capital improvements for the community, Bond Issue 2008. The November 4, 2008 election was held jointly with Nueces County and coincided with the Presidential Election. The Bond Issue 2008 package includes $153 million in projects to be funded from ad valorem property taxes (a General Obligation Bond Issue) in Street, Public Health and Safety, Public Facilities, Parks and Recreation, and Bayfront Master Plan projects. The proposed projects target the City's most immediate needs to improve existing physical facilities, provide for growth, and protect the City's investment in its infrastructure. FI:IHOMELKc0yDIGEN+POLICE & F1REIPOLICE15249- Police Vehicle Impound Family, Pill 4 ND 2000Cmstruc ival3 AGENDA BACKGROUND.doc PRIOR PROJECT ACTIONS SUBJECT: Police Vehicle Impound Facility, Phase 1 (BOND ISSUE 2008) Project No. 52491 CIP No. PH 07 PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION: 1. November 13, 2008 — Ordinance canvassing returns and declaring results of the Special Election held on November 4, 2008 in the City of Corpus Christi for the adoption of seven bond propositions and approval of a proposition to restrict vehicular access to and on the portion of the Gulf of Mexico Beach seaward of the concrete portion of the Padre Island Seawall, (Ordinance No. 027939) 2. November 18, 2008 - Resolution expressing official intent to reimburse costs of the 2008 Bond Capital Improvements Projects in an amount not to exceed $152,645,000 for improvements to Streets, Fire Department Facilities, Police Department Facilities, Libraries, Museums, Parks and Recreation Facilities, and Bayfront Development. (Resolution No. 027950) 3. May 26, 2009 — Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an engineering services contract with Freese and Nichols, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $280,211 for the new Vehicle Impound Facility, Phase 1 for design, bid, construction and additional phase services. (Bond 2008) (Motion No. 2009 -144) 4. December 15, 2009 - Ordinance approving the FY 2010 Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Planning Guide in the amount of $202,877,800. (Ordinance No. 028449) PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION: 1. September 19, 2008 - Distribution of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2008 -05 Bond issue 2008 and Other Projects to 206 engineering firms (86 Iocal and 120 non - focal). 2. October 14, 2008 — Addendum No. 1 to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2008 -05 Bond Issue 2008 and Other Projects to 206 engineering firms (86 local and 120 non - local). 3. October 20, 2008 — Addendum No. 2 to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2008 -05 Bond Issue 2008 and Other Projects to 206 engineering firms (86 Iocal and 120 non - local). 4. April 22, 2009 — Administrative approval of a small geotechnical testing agreement with Arias and Associates in the amount of $27,845 for the Police Vehicle Impound Facility, Phase 1 project. H.AHOMEVKoIlyO1GENWOLICE & FIREIPOLICE15249- Police Veiiide trnpound111I5,0hase 1 (BOND 21:43BYICcnstrucliorM PRIOR ACTIONS.doc EXHIBIT "B" Page 1 of 2 5. November 22, 2009 -- Administrative approval of Amendment No. 1 to the engineering services contract with Freese and Nichols, Inc. in the amount of $43,000 fora total restated fee of $323,211 for the Police Vehicle Impound Facility, Phase 1 project. 6. December 29, 2009 — Administrative approval of Amendment No. 2 to the engineering services contract with Freese and Nichols, Inc. in the amount of $18,205 for a total restated fee of $341,416 for the Police Vehicle Impound Facility, Phase 1 project. EXHIBIT "B" Page 2 of 2 H:IHDME1Keftyp\GEMPOLICE & FfREVPOLICEL5249. police Vehicle Impound Fa I . /hese 1 (BOND 2Q4BACmstruchon%4 PRIOR ACT&QNS.dcc R' U N cc N0 OU C W 0 2 oU 8 1- cry 0 g 1-2 u. • 2 0 LL U O u 0 uw W p R W � O W mO G 'o a R. mg 20 WC tii m 7 ¢E- ��d n flr 0 V 2 a gig W 2 z ul z z W a T. UNIT PRICE 0 DESCRIPTION ID m� m 49 a Y4 3 8 A 0 7 A 8 4, N ti 8 8 4, 8 0 N 69 p8 m m 8 v a N W p Wi N M $CAC 112 ggi2 N co w 8 C m 3 8 8 8 w 3 44 co a H N W 8 N N 8 8 8 a Q8 N 8 11) x N 1 N 8 N 8 0 49 0 N a 49 ■ CO 0 8 49 8 8 N W 8 1- l9 N 8 N 3 8 w 8 8 8 8 8 8 ti w 8 8 W o 49 z 8 N $8 Q N 8 a 0 8 8 K 8 $8 m N 8 8 i9 N 4 ti 8 8 8 8 r8i 8 w w w 8 rah 3 8 Co 69 8 8 3 8 Lei 8 8 a 8 8 w g. 8 8 8 49 Mm 8 rf a a K O8O 8 w 8 H 8 8 8 X87 8 a 8 8 w 8 u7 w m N 0 44 49 w 4, 0 In v 8 r7� 8 8 8 8 8 8 F. 8 8 8 co 0 0 N J J LI U U 6 J 6 6 N J 6 } 0 co 0 49 O 49 C 49 N Tr a N N N r 2 0 0, N 49 m 1 Z Y c C 3 Co a a co 0 1D n r m r _ 4 4 0) T 4 2 a N a 2 U a 3 a -452- EXHIBIT "C" Page 1 of 10 KJM Commercial. Inc. 1814 Holly Road Corpus Christi. TX 78417 — UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 543,825.77 $43,825.77 1 1,720.604.051 i Imfl G A � , r 2 'o-lP g3 e7 �M M W iLI ^ O IPART C: WATER DISTRIBUTION IMPROVEMENTS Zn A ��y wwg a mMnra aW wN M '!Q P' Fj ~g •a"�]. 1N MI $!$$$ { 6 �P {Cr0T nzaWr A e7 W 1[7 . .4p N T -po0 pp��1 nn — 2g a i] W ryQ a fie N 4, AIwwi 4 t m �p . rpO n Y pp•..� :: Nm ra 2 R$ at F 1 WE 69 a7 a Construction Baldwin risti. TX 78405 AMOUNT 56,100.00 Iy" r, Ili I �y W $ nw r l?§ yp� fp7 § Gi L7 w H 8 ® N �y �ppp FR w P. 4N2a H y� F[p yy gI�y.7Ntsaz ~wHM pp y @��llr'� yp� $p �r Hw kWim FN10 HNHH �y Qppp Wda yE app IA $2 0q 3 N g $8 a as $ � 8 A R NIA ;a8 OO IA wza °MV1NN$B N r W N +` imi N a 1. 51,067.50 $1,570.25 '44.24 IQ WW $I$88' � f� �gp @r~.m2IrO� Www a ran Construction 3ox 7692 ris0, TX 78467 AMOUNT 527,000.00 1.324,202.851 $$ §§ H � 8 888 N pp !9 y w QO w a9 8 N 88 G Pi a �! 81[188888'8+888$$8 mum a ws 4 G awNHN 513.005.00 52,800.00 53,630.00 5804.10 $3.150.00 w 1 52.25 53.143.25 52.815.00 52,815.00 812. v °2 2 8 S 8 $$$$$$$$$888g881�$$$18$$$N8 �NNN N W �p H TQ37 {{�� -6 0 5$ �5 a 1 55,652.50 $21,312.00 p� 8$8 ZS .w p ��p p pp rte$ $8 ui W gv. p 8 °o N p 8 pp p 88 8 v' m wa a p 88888$85$$ N p p p pIf c). . 0py, aagla 2Ipp5 ��yy $3,510.00 51.600.00 $$r$$5$$8 �5 tiraaaa p o p 1 y of g 51,200.00 51,800.00 8 aw z p 8p O a I p 8p1�- _K w 8 8 v,8 g ga p p 8 �p8 a p p 88 WN p p 88p H $$8$$$$$ IO NMam W w 'Q� ig g p p p �N$81p8 WaYID p p p o p pp$$ $ppp88888 Wfry d ris r; p p p p 24 w ITOTAL BID PART A (Items A-1 through A-33) ¢¢ W N N N U J J J N a6a L3 ¢W¢¢ J JaW4 C a 66tLiJ § O N 7 x 7N R r +-N W.- i- OI [7mCD(VI MN[�7T N VNl�r� - POUCE VEHICLE IMPOUND FACIL TY, l BOND ISSUE 2008 Project No. 5249 DESCRIPTION Fumusr+ and Install all miscellaneous electrical and electrical systems including but not limited to panelboards. grounding system. lighting Contactors. disconnects, support systems, etc. il & 5" Concrete Rip -Rap for Sedimentation Ditch 5' Wide Concrete Flume Excavation ilt Fence for Storm Water Pollution Prevention C 0 a a 1 CF %m F ii, a Trench Safety for Drainage Remove and Replace Concrete Ditch Liner _ BID PART B (Items B -1 through B -11) 12. Dla. SCH. 80 PVC Waterline 2" Dia. SCH 80 PVC 90' Bend '2" Dia. SCH 80 PVC Tee 2" Dia. SCH 80 PVC Cap 2" Water Service Connection Line 6" Gate Valve and Valve Box w/Cover 12" Dia.C900 PVC (DR18) Waterline 12" {sate Vane and Valve Box w/Cover 12" - 45' DI Bend 12" - 90' DI Bend 12')12" Tee 12" Dia. DI Waterline 24" Dia. Steel Casing (Bored) Fire Hydrant Assembly (Type 1) 12" Tie-in/Connection to 12" Water Service Connection Concrete Sidewalk Repair 2" Water Meter w1Meter Box ISIeeve Termination 2" PVC Observation Well C 1! ,U :1 % : 1- c5N 3ddc55c5 '63r� -453- EXHIBIT "C" Page 2of10 1 2 LL w uJ 2 8 Z JQ 1 8 W h -454- IEXHIBIT "C" I Page 3 of 10 $ M1 F. H f ®$Q,.: iR 5 Rgy.J 1[7 O 4, O ° k N Yj c8v m 1� 1 w 8.-t2---2 (A.� ltq�y} N .4 ,~ K � .,� { Q) vj Y9 �i $ T Vi . (. W v 8$ 4 8 [l y'1 W V/ v° .... PART E: ADDITIVE ALTERNATE NO. 1 - HALA PIT ROAD A ;41§. 119 A N y U4 (y A 5. CV N 12.v.`.1 pl m m N KN A 1� M $ g. f�1 57.412. I N r A r p mm pp CINGNAr a WsWHHa ��pp N $23.38 $25.51 $4,405.32 2 8Ql rza M �pry�Nt[1 - WWWW Y9 $12.24 $6. .- O 88 r4 G g 81�� ry��y y W a 8 W yj Biel � �Np Y9 Drip sag 8s 8g m8 Yl r49ww H $18.30 $275.92 53,013.92. 56.616.15, 8 Wa �yy v, m ill N N g y5 W rAi ��� nil H 5479.28 53,590.46 $1.464.00 38 1,F�, iy 8 $ nay 8 8 8 § 25 4, P 00,. N kg ;8 O7n °r ` y 49 8 §�p °Fj V9 H 5;q. cyA e�}, cp�ppp'i, 49wH u, L 8 g q�i$ 1I 49 an pqp�� Y9 v y ffi n H h $18.30 1275.92 $10.92 513.77 pp pp 8 m pp pppp N Y c0 pOp77? $624.641 `,2-1.48$•18 o im1pp 522999 1.i01�19� V FKl : o 4p] F. N 8 pS ppC 1A O a§ N W 4 �try� p� oP �N� qp t p 2 N 1� W pp� R. W[VH W p7p � Egg O� N � 888888888 • § 4: pp T fH w 8 omf W M 8 1ST W 888 8 Grp NrA p 8 fpCry+ lV TM ryR . ? p G M M 8 47 i $2.815.00 55.000.00 L r {y I� r w 82 p a m y yEy P'3 MN p p �cQQ 1p�p F1 [ 82 7 §0 [W {rte Y7 p® G� W 828 R 1 yN f1p� m1 888888888 i tri 8 w 8 CD 8888888 in w 77 8 8 8 as 1 8888 4 8 88$ X 19 8 888 -c4.4 y Ltd. Sox 9908 nsti. TX 78469 AMOUNT $5.000.00 1140,817.50 888888888 r3$1 r w § §el M ri c'i. w r°$ � 8 °8 W r"r3 8 8 w 88888$8 §E§§4,7-1,1 _ yr - r`X w ... 4, $ . 8 8 2i w w 8 N co H 88$8 m 49 43 P n ca+ 51,206.00 525,479.00, 8 "' a `1 8 rr§� 278 w 888 'OH �n 7- r°$ 2 c4(8$88fQ8pq.88/8pp8 11 8NY29p1 iq r: W 8 2 !9 pp8pp [� VWW9 QQ88848LL78Q88 O (9 §Y9.W W - W pp8 4] IA 88 pp8 W O N if 49 49 pp 88 8 IL7 HfA 49 (8y $ 19 6 888 YIW $ ►9 888 W V)W LL li]11]11]W 1L LL J J LL LL ¢( �J IL,I LL ¢¢ >~ WNWJLI]NN ¢¢ LL LL LL N J N N J J ITOTAL BID PART D (Items D -1 through Dal) V(�}}}>- ) ,)ii Y (1)C Y- ]. u LLLL .Jpv1 LL &) r ,- �� N Tr co C. a rn ma c„- � v `',l •- r •- ryQi►7il) !r 8 8 a m� A m m eq T-742 e m ,n n§ N 14' PVC Sanitary Sewer Line (0'-6' Depth) 4" PVC WYE 4" - 45' PVC Bend 4" PVC Cap 4" PVC Cleanout 6" PVC Sanilar r Sewer Line (0' -6' Depth) 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer Line (6'-8' Depth) 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer Line (8' -10' Depth) 0" PVC Sanitary Sewer Line (10' -12' 4' Dia. Fiberglass Manhole (Type A) (0'-6' Depth) Extra Depth for 4' Dia. Manhole (Type A) (over 6' Depth) Tie -in to Existing 12" Stub -out Pavement Repair (Asphalt) Sanitary Service Connection Trench Safety for Sanitary Sewer Line Trench Safely for Sanitary Sewer Remove and Replace Concrete Driveway Concrete Sidewalk Repair Remove Concrete Post Inlet and Plug 18" RCP Pipe Traffic Control Unanticipated Wastewater Utility Allowance Z 1O 2 e Ol CC co c- Geogrid c!ype 1) 14" Crushed Limestone Flexible Base (Type A. Grade 1) 'Prime Coat (0.15 GaI/SY) ,4" HMAC Surface Course (Type 0) 9" Concrete Pavement 6" Crushed Limestone Flexible Base (Type A, Grade 1) to 14° Concrete Sidewalk a. to 06260116d16d n N G d d N 07 ddddddd v 4> co n co r. d d d r N 2 wwww w A Lwthw 97 +u G •�„ wwLiw 1 2 LL w uJ 2 8 Z JQ 1 8 W h -454- IEXHIBIT "C" I Page 3 of 10 a a 8 ti 0 W 2 w gl•,, R1 " M Ill Ali mm r9 T H ry8 a 8 co a. Z H $7,201.00' 1 $6,822.00 5.26 $731 $9,262.76 )N -- a gte ivy G ag 8 N H i s Tl }��j V A. - 1a� N N o u7 t oo 1. a M R I NNNYl3HN n pp�� e7t0K pp F 6 N ; 111 iiil 2 I $129,085.601 g w a Slat w ' Ili :8 i 8 SQ �p [Ny ~ '^' r: H • q~ H m •y r ro ry N eo p� N 8 Y °{ A E 13 e�, t{p� 1 N ��$w8 5^ �y W Q N y� � at2 1 �y r 1m� gHfR pp T k r �p 10 Or N pp �y �p �y �NU V �w.R N v.$ N Q et .. a $ V .. t+ t: ni 0. N N W p 8 a M c~O2 oo m W ;i N 7+ $ r pp H C 8618 H m YN1 4$ 88i =8 88 ' - S ot 5 a N x p ¢ 888_ gT "' r ti a- N [PART F: ADDITIVE ALTERNATE NO. 2 - TRANSITION RAMPS a 1 H $102,263.851 8 it 8 s 8 i g $$8c.88$?.$k g g N d N N y r N Q 111111 �.e in d f • CO w _ g= o _ r �i _ w- ipR "�' "�' 3 w rya M w S�' w 88 w r..7, w °i�$ � 1 a 8 �8 ���ppp [4� L7 1n px 8 H w p F g „II 8 8 p8 O ,• Cw (4 r N I y8 �8 cO.O� pWp 1g i ♦R p i3 iR $ pig N m$ M 1 _ 8 $ 1a mm888883 0. sN ; l�l Ny2H r O ��yy r- A F ri K _ _ _ _ I= O _ &_ _ _ _ _$ $1.50 53.000.00! F -1 'Transition Ramps (Recycled Asphalt) J 379 ] CY 1 $19.00 TOTAL BID PART F (Item F-1) $� 8 n 3 88888'4.8 V- TOTAL BID PART E (Items E -1 through E -24) 69 41 'TOTAL BID PART G (Items G-1 through 0-2) 1 0 'TOTAL BID PART H (Items H -1 through H-3) [YAU.WJC)NN W 'TOTAL BID PART I Memel-1 through I -7) — 1 N '- Y a r V r F, [V i. w m 0 MARE A m 4 POLICE VEHICLE IMPOUND FACILITY, I BOND ISSUE 2008 Project No. 5249 DESCRIPTION Concrete Curb Ramp 6' Concrete Curb and Gutter Pavement Repair (Asphaltl Remove and Replace Existing Concrete Driveway Remove Exislind Concrete Curb and Remove Existing Concrete Sidewalk Street Sign Assembly w/9" Blades & Stop Sign Refl. Pvmt. Marking Type1 (Y) (4') (Solid) (Double) 0. CI) Seeding for Erosion Control Traffic Control LJ V G m z T. I a i l ` 2 Course Surface Treatment (TYPE PE Aggregate) Saw Cut and Remove Existing Concrete ' To JJJH1 a ILI W W 2 z I 1:2215'.212 —455— EXHIBIT "C" Page 4 of 10 a 5 8 t z ❑ .2 0 YO U O C g Lu •a ��z 0 z �a o cL }�w co ❑�� 'a mai L � DESCRIPTION ti m 2 A m [7 H W F us 1 to m° w •u 8 11; ID v m N K W8 8 or w T N N N uD co co co N N w L L 5 th E m 1- 0 0 0 0 2 J 2 0 M 0 —456— IEXHIBIT "C" Page 5of10 }FF 5 u. 0 v Z0 0 U1 F Z Z w w 0 8 w w w a 2 b 4 p m N ❑ mC w 7 �¢F 7 H o _1 a (PART A: VEHICLE IMPOUND FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS Qoo$o m03 00000 2.2 a mmmmmm ❑❑ zzzzz mm 009_0 a❑❑ 2 m x NO BID NO BID 5224,730,47 NO B10 NO BID1 $49.159.75 NO BID NO BID 1 $685,890.00 NO BID NO BID 5704.00 $2.20 5484.00 5111 675.60 555.5t1 5154 206 78 52,053.26 54.70 52.636.701 L' ; i `' 1 $. ` H 8 Q ^ 'i' w 8 • f t w`?- o m ❑ 2 NO 1310 0 m ❑ Z NO BIDI NO BID 00000' m Z mmmm Z 2 2 2 0 m ❑ 2 2 m ❑ z 2 m ❑ Z 2 m ❑ z UNIT PRICE, o m z $8 O 0 m i 8 cv o m s 8 9222 Cam zixz c8 0 r H 0 853888 0 w $17.967.001 NO 8IDI 51.200.00 NO BID 0 CO z co 2 0 m z 58 H 5565.00 NO BID 5241.255.00 NO BID 018 ON 00'549' I. 1.5 0 J 1 8888 n m m n HHHiA ] 5271.200.00 5113,129.00 5114,971.25 g uT g a 5 Z D [8(mUR Y9 Ml iR w 8 y 8� 8 w 2 w RR 8 w 7 M��3 ` �; fi, 8-' FF w ` 8 8 8 �C] E 8 [V in 8 853888 y� w OW i0 H 8 O �' `" 8 H 6 m Garrett Construction, Co. Davila Construction, Inc. P.O. Box 1028 520 Bonham Ingleside, TX 78362 San Antonio. TX 78205 0 i R' R z D i EEE pp pv 8 r p w I§ w O " MMEINMEIii 5153.639.36 pp �p pp 8 2 {$ �.1fj w : :: i pm . 8 • • - a h .. p G �p NH 51,272.00 W a H p 8 w q A H 8.8 • 51,590.00 $39.778.62 $16,960.00 8 LL'7 Vl a yo8� � H pa8 Qq8 {Q p N 8 fA pw 8. n �y ppp� HHHK $0.53 52.17 $2.81 8 N H r� H 8; G Pi �' -r 8' el -a3 ] 3 8 M CO c`Pi df 8 w 8 r D w 8pm88 IH [+i NHN�� w p88 2 `A g 8aa H �8 § a 8 pp8 a N 8 ay 8 g r_ H 88$8° N gyp} p�pj{�G� H H r 3 a 1 8 �p FJ W 4 �p °y W �pC W H i9 88 �' 1�1'� H N W _ �p gym.' ..- f '� O(yO C'� pp W a pN pp H R8a�N88 (V O �H O H 47�l] W ( ®� 8 bQ 1+70 aA w w �'n W oW p 8 8 I. • In (pOp ffAV ° QG: [0 'W Z tie�jmSI S 8 �r1n 8 w 8° b w 53.25 543.70 53.70 -. _oY£ .c `. ' 3 o w w 8voA38$ mQr XXX A m �$ m 2 ° o eri POLICE VEHICLE IMPOUND FACILITY, PHASE 1 BOND ISSUE 2008 Protect No. 5249 Z NriJ U(qN UJ tAr JJ J ��s'Il]' -y 6 U U Y! J 66 J�� J U ..] co Q F 1r"n -gig gi 8 pE g 2 2 pip [21 s „ p � �y A - CVN 117 v T. - .� .,_ . }! 4 ry N§ N N n r CV r pp p r �C7 r i_1 O Site Clearing Site Grading g. p� 19" Crushed Limestone Flexible Base (Type A, GR.1 ) 8" Reclaimed Asphalt Paving Base Prime Coat (0.15 GAL/ST) 2 Course Surface Treatment (TYPE PE Aggregate) Remove Existino Fence 8' Chain Link High Security Fence Security Modifications to Existing 6' Chain Link Fence jR yy "iT '+ - F - - t NL7 Q = 25'x30' Steel Canopy with Arched Metal Roof Soil Excavation at Canopy Foundations (12CYIEA) t7 . np g2 !Handicap Symbol Markings 4" Parking Stripes G Q fi !Concrete Wheel Stops ILandscaping Ozone Action Day y� 1i.�6R N D '3��77 iQ H. Process Recycled Asphalt Material Fumish and install all electrical wiring. raceway systems, ductbanks, puliboxes as shown in the Plans and Specifications Fumish and install Iighling including but not limited to light fixtures. poles concrete bases, etc. as shown in the Plans and Specifications _ m_ ❑ .7 I7 �aa 7 LA ¢ dr N a.k a C9*00Nm. 444444 CO 4 CV 0 4 [V ¢44¢444 N N ryNNry N 4¢ M a M 4 —457— EXHIBIT "C" Page 6of10 -N � loi a j Q re Z M NO BID NO BID r IPARTB: STORM WATER DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 0 m 0 z NO BIDI NO 1:6 2 m z NO BID NO BID NO BID 9 m ❑ x NO BID( 1010 ON 019 ON — (PART C: WATER DISTRIBUTION IMPROVEMENTS 1 c m ❑ z NO BID NO BID g02.1:4022 0000000 NO BID( NO 610 NO BID NO BID1 NO BID NO BIDI an�oa`a mmmmm 00000 22xzz m ❑ 2 NO BID mm ii 00 22 NO 610 NO BID NO 810 g m NO BID( e mar 00 2 2 oomogg mow 00000 22222 NO 610 NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID oo 00 Z x NO BID noon mmmm 0000 2222 NO BID NO BID om mm 00 x 2 Leoncltos. inc. 2621 Holly Road Corpus Christi. TX 78415 AMOUNT 8 aN4HiA 2,890,978.331 2888 pp �{ O 1p1p p8p r8� W ?aid 8 pNr�k Y9H �� CSR H N � ®gyp lY 7� Y•l Ql Y!W 0 �p Ogaim K pN y8 w 5971.80 $40557.96 1 59.087.00 $3.254.40 ye� 1044 Y,7.viH44"i:i 8 �i ppSpppj ���N7 f�COy yp8 8 � 8 �1 U R tp m $ fQ+7 $8$8 w2kg Ky N v 3 as i3w w N E ID'. ;a4gFii 4914 5971.80 540.68 '3,029.°°1 8iVgv�0vv°888 yPVii Y4 Y! Wt2' 2222mk MM g 5226.00 5226.80 88 Davila Construction. Inc. 520 Bonham San Antonio. TX 78205 UNIT PRICE 1 AMOUNT $ IN+! �i_y'p a Qry a`L ..-VS-3- p ��q f� $3.016.861 O7 H �p $ III pp s g W ry pp f�Npp 7 O pp 8 W p N fA pry o �y �tl8 p8 IN[; C{ �i ���pp 8 T. Y n 1°0.990'1.'6 1 fry��pp ".1 iz. H p N p p 0 0 N 55,t1182.87 5530.00 .11MJ 8 3 NN o g pCC R } - } r. v W 2 Wy ¢ 1. 8 ro W W So V rya�EiiDYa2"R p N p Ep Qrr • i k Q sag. c o h 0 s E 0 N2 A0 amett Construction. Co. P.O. Box 1028 Ingleside. TX 78362 a 8 00 �i $ { In V9N 8888 �iw�w m � - ui 8 K 55,852.00 520,440.00 v N P. g �i 110,798.35 8 o N.6" r N rn u¢i, �7 WwS rQu,c9i,v00v,i�$$ •- n8, v r+ 0y� vrr��y ;Y4Y9141 4, oqn m r~ �vp v 51.870.001 8$ei°.r.p i� wt �s4, V" r�i +p- a (1 w y a. 2 8 NV! in Nry o '? 8 47 W i "3 fA � g M1 t: Li � N K app H 22 w �Y4 4 0 N Y9NWi9�„� 00 n ' g W 00 0 g O❑ g 0. 0- 5103.20 5424.85 h pOppp iR 54,208.40 51,829.25 O YS pppp tryryV V9 8 m7 Vi rgi 2 72 Yl POLICE VEHICLE IMPOUND FACILITY, PHASE 1 BOND ISSUE 2008 Project No. 5249 Z m .NJ J w6 I!] u°1JLL1u666LLJL] W W N Il]66'2 -5 1 i 5 6 1 - , k , N NU .J J L23 16 (TOTAL BID PART B (Items 6 -1 through B -11) 0 (p [`7 �, N �r P7 fOmN p� rySl7 NP7 N YN�r (� rL]'? rp N Qp O W gy} Np"p [Q R W DESCRIPTION Furnish and install all miscellaneous electrical and electrical systems including but not IImried to psne10oar0s. grounding system. lighting contactors, disconnects, support systems. etc. L13113 PART A (Items A-1 through A-33) m 8 CO 2 ❑ tv '2" Dia. SCH 80 PVC Tee 2" Dia. SCH 80 PVC Cap 12" Water Service Connection Line - -� 6" Gate Valve and Valve Box w/Cover 12"DIa.C900 PVC (DR18) Waterline 12" Gate Valve and Valve Box w/Cover 12" -45° DI Bend 12" - 90' DI Bend 12x12" Tee 12' Dia. Dl Waterline 24" Dia. Steel Casing (Bored) .I. u. 12' Tie- in/Connectian to 12" Water Service Connection 1Concrete Sidewalk Repair 1 12" Water Meter w/Meter Box F.. ❑ Trench Safety for Waterline Traffic Control loner UOISOG JO; SuIpOOS 148" Dia. RCP IStone Rip -Rap Filtration I 5" Concrete Rip -Rap for Sedimentation Ditch E 4) 0 ISM Fence for Storm Water Pollution Prevention Rode Filter Dam for Storm Water Pollution Prevention Trench Safely for Drainage Reprove and Replace Concrete Ditch Liner m mr Q m m �, o� ,I— � 5N 3338 A g3(.5Tnsq(. :; :;6m h :.°S 7) -458- EXHIBIT "C" Page7of10 —459— EXHIBIT "C" Page8af10 0 CO 2 acogoo2 23C9mWmID 22222E2 NO BID NO BID NO BID NO SID PART E: ADDITIVE ALTERNATE NO. 1 - HAt_A NT ROAD �20C 23 22 CO CO NO BID NO BID NO BID1 NO BID ia im ;r ❑x a m z 00 mmm zzz 222 mmm 222 zzz 2 CO 0 x 2002200 aammmmmm 0000000 xxxxxzx 53.96 599.00 NO BID $678.00 5678.00 NO 810 5565.00 5565.00 NO BID 55,000.00 55,000.00 NO BID i556,848.33 2222 mcomm 2222 xx 2 m 2 goo mmm 22❑ az a m 2 x -- imil 53,600.00 515,514.52 88 a '- 1.--, 8 r288 w 8 w 8g1 y2 $ 2 8"8'$.: 21 1 -� 8082 §444 $V- n gag 8 8 4 8SN wax ::E. -- 94 = lam+, 8 8 - N ;:: u° m N K/! IKYLEEI 8 Nw I FR N tlI 8. q w ligNH , N fl 3Nw [+7 LLm K $ M 5 .4: N lstructlon, Co. Sax 1028 TX 78382 AMOUNT $5,000.00 5264,027.75 53.622.00 542.50 538.85 524.30 5559.60 515.069.60 524,032.25 56.34125 51 .00 536,415.60 igil 8 5736.25 51,621.50 51,314.00 55,000.00 5119,314.05 �$8$$ wens 69 m !$ 3 148 aAa 61 Q$ Si 8$$ w Vt.; 69 1114F, i0 1 $10.455.55 55.50 .1'4 y gg° i9 Wag 110161100131110 c C.) < GO 19 > 63 Lj N o ao 00 m m r,- r r' Extra Depth for 4' Dia. Manhole (Type A) (over 6' Depth) Tie -In to Existing 12" Stub -out Pavement Repair (Asphalt) Sanitary Service Connection Trench Safety for Sanitary Sewer Line Trench Safety for Sanitary Sewer Remove and Replace Concrete Driveway J Concrete Sidewalk Repair Remove Concrete Post Inlet and Plug 18" RCP Pipe Traffic Control ,Unanticipated Wastewater Utility Allowance . 81D PART 0 (items 0 -1 through 0-21) H H s 2 m Z Ti, Prime Coat (0.15 GaVSY) 4- HMAC Surface Course (Type 0) 1 6" Crushed Limestone Flexible Base (Type I A. Grade 1) IS" Concrete Curb '4" Concrete Sidewalk 8 d N[ 1 6666666 Y Vl CD M1- CO m 6 6 thwLu q W WWW W p WLi,iii F —459— EXHIBIT "C" Page8af10 IEXHIBIT "C" I Page 9 of 10 in) 'o z NO BID e to zz £ to zzzzzz I imailogoto 1222222 m o m i a CO z 0 CO z CO z 0 0 CO z I NO BID NO BID NO BID IOt9 ON U1B ON 0 i WI T N rR W 88 N 8 W ? 4i 88r�88y8$8IS 4 N W 4, r N 7 R W - H 8883 QQQN9W 49 18 '< N ep 49 IITE py N w ppp� V! x 69 p p p 'iri r N Y! IM9 pN e 0 •:'J r • a mm ! A "�} H g g $te T- y W y �q}8 H H uW7 instruction. Co. Box 1028 e. TX 78362 AMOUNT 52,631.45 $16,447.20 52,601.90 53,508.65 5524.80 5567.00 5389.65 52,062.50 5506.60 5480.60 51.615.25 51.827.90 $160,635.50 57,163.10 $7,163.10 $50,694.901 E I. 8 5 V V IF� w 518.524.401 8 N 8 N w 7 V$ T M W O N O la 8 m v. 514.75 5113.40 540.10 O8 W M 'TOTAL BID PART G (items G -1 through G-2) 'TOTAL BID PART H (Items H -1 through H-3) 'TOTAL. BID PART I (Items 1 -1 through 1 -7) 1 r w [v n 40 ... ep. to N 0 9" Crushed Limestone Flexible Base (Type A, Grade 1) ] c co Iag N G 2 Course Surface Treatment (TYPE PE 1 Aggregate) Excavation Concrete Barrier Well lIE Fill Material r Concrete Ramp 6" Concrete Rip -Rap r x N x P7 t S 1 S N 9 —460— ti cc 2 0 V) D 0 U m5 0� 2 �) 5? Hz 0 LL 0 F Z LiS 2 O CO ui a. 070 g 09 w Dui al Fence, Inc. iox 1354 a. TX 77501 AMOUNT �"" c m z o m NO BID ° m z 9 m z 4 i N ► :itos. Inc. lolly Road risii. TX 78415 AMOUNT ] O tvj $163.613.16 $11,999.14 in 0 H 0 A G ca CIF Garrett Construction. Co. Davila Construction. Inc. P.O. Box 1028 520 Bonham Ingleside, TX 78362 San Antonio. TX 78205 UNIT UNf• PRICE AMOUNT UNff PRICE 4 AMOUNT I$2,341,949.90 W go w N °m Y4 ei `01 c. 33,018,740.831 _ $1,579,275.85 $110,798.35 3264,027.75 $119,314,05 0 CO aIl- n 0 w 3160,835.50 37,163.10 .- I 1 n M 0 r M gr. c+ 44 'TOTAL BASE BID (Parts A, B, C d D) TOTAL ADDITIVE ALTERNATE NO. 1 (Part E) TOTAL ADDITIVE ALTERNATE NO. 2 (Part F) TOTAL ADDITIVE ALTERNATE NO. 3 (Part G) TOTAL ADDITIVE ALTERNATE NO. 4 (Part ft) TOTAL ADDITIVE ALTERNATE NO. 5 (Port 1) AWARD: TOTAL BASE BID + ADD. ALT 1, 3 6 4 -461- PROJECT BUDGET POLICE VEHICLE IMPOUND FACILITY, PHASE 1 BOND ISSUE 2008 Project No. 5249 July 20, 2010 FUNDS AVAILABLE: Bond Issue 2008 (Police Improvements) $2,700,000.00 Storm Water CIP $95,322.70 Water CIP $154,899.25 Wastewater CIP $89,458.05 Total $3,039,680.00 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction, (Bay, Ltd.) $2,107,855.57 Contingencies 210,785.56 Consultant Fees: Consultant, Freese and Nichols, Inc. (Large AIE, Amd Nos. 1 & 2) $341,416.00 Testing, Arias & Associates (Geotechnical Testing) $27,845.00 Reimbursements: Contract Administration (Contract Preparation /Award /Admin) $57,966.03 Engineering Services (Project MgtlConstr Mgt/Traffic Mgt) 73,774.94 Construction Inspection 73,774.94 Finance Issuance 26,348.19 Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 10,539.28 TOTAL $2,930,305.52 FUNDS REMAINING $109,374.48 File : \ Mpro' ect\councrlexhibits\exh52498.dw VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE POLICE VEHICLE IMPOUND FACILITY, PHASE 1 (BOND 2008) CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES PAGE: f of 7 DATE: 6 -29 -2010 .. -463- 31 AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Action Date: July 20, 2010 SUBJECT: Q.N. Stevens Process Monitoring Instrumentation and Automation Improvements (Project No. 86001 CIP No. WA 01) AGENDA ITEM: Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract with KST Electric of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the amount of $1,828,992.39 for the O.N. Stevens Process Monitoring Instrumentation and Automation Improvements for the total base bid. ISSUE: The proposed project is one of six major improvement projects at the Q.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant that have been undertaken recently or are planned to be started shortly. They include the following: ➢ Q.N. Stevens Process Monitoring Instrumentation and Automation Improvements ➢ O.N. Stevens Electrical Distribution Improvements ➢ Q.N. Stevens Raw Water Influent Improvements ➢ Q.N. Stevens Facilities Feed Optimization Improvements ➢ Q.N. Stevens Facility Alterations ➢ Q.N. Stevens On -Site Generation Improvements The design consultant, Bath Engineering Corporation, was initially selected for this project through Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2007 -05 CIP Projects FY 2008 -2009 Scoping, Estimating, Design Services. The original contract for this project was executed on June 3, 2008, and it included a broad overview of existing conditions and research and review of existing documentation. Amendment No. 1 to the professional services contract implemented some of those recommendations, including providing the necessary engineering design and support services (bidding and construction support) for the installation of new sensors and analyzers for turbidity, pH, and chlorine residual. Amendment No. 2 provided for the upgrading of the Filter Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC). The existing Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) center is a single PLC that controls the entire filtration system at the treatment plant. This PLC and its manual controls are obsolete and create a single point of failure for the entire filtration system. This contract is for the construction award for the installation of new water quality monitoring analyzer systems as well as the civil work for contractors' parking and lay down yard for future improvements at the plant. The project has bid and Council approval is needed to proceed with construction. FUNDING: Funding is available through the Water Capital Improvement Budget FY 2010. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. HAHO BRaohellelGEHlWalerIONSWTPWDZI- Process Monitoring Inslnrre tact orytrugionAgenda Memodoc Xf Gustavo Gonzalez, P.E. Director of Water Services Additional Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F° Support Material: Agenda Background Information Prior Project Actions Bid Tabulation Project Budget Location Map Powerpoint Presentation Pete Anaya, P.E. Director of Engineering Services HAWGMEIReohellelGENlWalonON3WfP18800- Process Monitoring InsvwnemalioyltructionMAgends Memo, doe AGENDA BACKGROUND INFORMATION SUBJECT: Q.N. Stevens Process Monitoring Instrumentation and Automation Improvements (Project No. 86001 CIP No. WA 01) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of the removal of the existing field sampling equipment, existing bubbler -type level indication equipment, and other miscellaneous monitoring equipment; installation of new water quality monitoring analyzer systems with all associated probes, sensors, and mounting racks, new level transmitters; replacement of the existing network fiber -optic switches, and required replacement and re- termination of any existing fiber -optic cabling. The project will also include the civil work for contractors parking and lay down yard. The sequence of work shall require installation, startup, and full operation of the new systems in accordance with the plans, specifications, and contract documents. BID INFORMATION: On June 9, 2010, the City received proposals from three bidders (see Exhibit "C" Bid Tabulation). The bids ranged from $1,828,992.39 to $2,145,215. The estimated cost of construction is $2,372,505. The proposal from Scott Electric in the amount of $2,145,215 was deemed non - responsive because the proposal was not signed and a page was missing from the bid package. The consultant, Bath Engineering Corporation, has reviewed the required documents from the low bidder, KST Electric and have discussed with them the work required and scheduling for this project. KST Electric is a subsidiary of Rosendin Electric Inc. Based on the information they have submitted, City staff and the consultant are recommending that the construction contract be awarded to KST Electric in the amount of $1,828,992.39 for the Q.N. Stevens Process Monitoring Instrumentation and Automation improvements. CONTRACT TERMS: This project duration will be for a period of 210 calendar days, with completion anticipated in March 2011. PROJECT BACKGROUND: Currently the instrument monitoring and analyzing for Texas Commission on Environmental Quality requirements (chlorine residual, pH and turbidity) are located in the Chemical Building basement of the Q.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant (ONSWTP). There are long sample lines (up to 1,000 feet) before the water is actually analyzed. These long sample lines create a severe delay in response time, which leads to poor monitoring of each of the process variables and inaccurate readings of water quality. Accurate, real -time analysis of the water will be accomplished and documented with new instrument analyzers in the field located at the sample points and connected to a central control room with the improved network system. H: HOMElRechelle1GENIWaleriONSWTPI $B00-Process Moniloring InstrurnentatiorifenrellionlAgenda Background_doc EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 1 PRIOR PROJECT ACTIONS SUBJECT: O.N. Stevens Process Monitoring instrumentation and Automation Improvements (Project No. 86001 CIP No, WA 01) PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION: 1. April 21, 2009 — Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Contract for Professional Services with Bath Engineering Corporation of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the amount of $398,600 for a revised fee of $445,600 for O.N. Stevens Process Monitoring Instrumentation and Automation Improvements. (Motion No. 2009 -097) 2. December 15, 2009- Ordinance approving the FY 2010 Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Planning Guide in the amount of $202,877,800. (Ordinance No. 028449) 3. January 19, 2010 - Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Contract for Professional Services with Bath Engineering, Corporation of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the amount of $380,915, for a total restated fee of $826,515 for the O.N. Stevens Process Monitoring instrumentation and Automation Improvements Project. (Motion No. 2010 -023) PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION: 1. December 28, 2007 - Distribution of Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2007 -05 CIP Projects FY 2008 -2009 Scoping, Estimating, Design Services to 191 engineering firms (78 Iocal and 113 non- Iocal). 2. January 14, 2008 - Addendum No. 1 to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2007- 05 CIP Projects FY 2008 -2009 Scoping, Estimating, Design Services to 191 engineering firms (78 local and 113 non - local). 3. January 17, 2008 - Addendum No. 2 to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2007- 05 CIP Projects FY 2008 -2009 Scoping, Estimating, Design Services to 191 engineering firms (78 Iocal and 113 non - local). 4. June 3, 2008 — Administrative approval of an agreement for Architect/Engineer Consultant Services with Bath Engineering Corporation in the amount of $47,000 for D.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Process Monitoring Instrumentation and Automation Improvements. 5. May 23, 2009 — Administrative approval of an agreement for Architect/Engineer Consultant Services with Freese and Nichols, Inc. in the amount of $44,400 for O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Process Monitoring Instrumentation and Automation Improvements — SCADA Upgrades. N:WOM BRachellelGEHIWa[eAOHSWTPIBGUO- Process Monitoring InsWmenlaliontms uclronlPrior Project Adicns.daz — N Mm am my2 00 O N w 2 m ❑8 Pm +0] 0 a w 0 P a w i 2 w TABULATION OF BIDS c d s 0 ui d 4 m Q0 ae Wtom On sQ ❑D F Z ❑ 1-6J a a 2 w 0 2 aQ wcr Nt}` h ape F Z 2 Wa D .. N 0 OD z 2 0 N w F 2 0 F a y F 2 2 0 N 0. CC 0 w 0 wO H2 $ 1,803,978.40 Q) J $ 1.705.710.00 NJ F D J 0 n J0 w= fA Q S W w J h 2 2 ¢ 7 -Zwp cc Uf-2 m v W Os �iy 2 a��9~LLp ti ¢zmOF 1za 20w1Lw 2mI-0 W wD�O J w xQ+2LL mQ❑ 86=1 w-ilm jv[rmJr' = 1 -W1-�0 F�¢�dy0 �2ou `aJ1E1 JaDWa zi sa w guimz¢Qh LL1_aw �1 _ "g2xa fnzz�D w�nJ_ 0� 0090 2_/°W.,-w Nw�Nr- zx }4 -xxZ2 pwUQ 000-) xp }xax_ � ' W w0- a0j} g_wUF1-2x yfnw 2 A [7wwwl--'d w ❑m2 = ceTmhDcVF -a ❑ W w =F- 2mgLut -000 dYh0 x0 _,ziLu2a ^'r❑'❑2 w0 >=LLw00 0b -z Q ❑��1(� [Y �¢ Q 0 UN2FHOmF¢ � N7 W fh!11'flt' VJ 7N S¢QNx 0w: ❑aw0&5 LL2�W mxcxi,�, N�vUJ [7NU�ia ("1•-01" ❑w a nww _jzJw z zwg�0 441- zzCaUOmr- 0.00 ❑H ~��jjDU[Y J OvNwN2 '❑4f1C?d.:(0 1 Dap hpC)o� „OQW� E0>p� �zz��W �wx w��� [n�rOD 1 =Na12¢ ¢'w� -J5WU ZN+x-a - W10 _lZw <0 Dg0QF¢ Ow-- 01~5 Q��W fl jz0w0� JQ 0 gw❑F IDtx- ❑N❑r -�02 szww m0'<-Q<> � ❑❑ 0 H Z N <-, 5 W E E ” w W 0 0 0 N❑ 5 w 7mgph f0 oNOZo� -2�z ¢z� rya ,ozza2-r-,z -Jw.1 LLZ�Nwi?wra/� �A �0 JC7 ❑U. dhmQx2r -w w>w§ Z wNZmr]Z2H w2Di�wQ}`Z. %22tr0-¢S 00 721_ W 4w2m 020w Zzz�UN�{ 0 -; w¢Www0 wx ❑z L7u2ai ~�2ava��WQw1u1J1 m_l1=a_�vwm0 aw[7N ❑0Vr71~iNf17?OwwUZ ..J---00m,_-1-0 f0 WOY ❑ Qh W H q w Q❑ Q W w J ww W 2 x N 2 a d 2 N aq F 5 <-J5,J1wwuz,0 `F`N,QQli �dz¢w0.ww❑ Da02 ¢ ❑wn a 0 ❑ 34 a0❑¢cwWaw1¢ii 000��a ow°aaww"LL¢ n�0j ¢aav1x -�D. - -0 ha?zoa hF01- 00 -0.0z W1-Qo <Ww2r❑ > QD SWwafitu m6mzwwpo uwz Eawow wggwwjwcew0 1 41U0�h7 1 w Z-W Uw ,+ ❑aaq¢ui Wommit0m1 -2~ z0 >�;� - <2Jrn20.L 1L N>_ >0 ❑ J Q 2 2 w ❑- U J❑ 2 75 wmt-,5 2mN❑ wfn z0Q wL] U?C]CfHw w w xurzD w❑ w❑ x 0wz z0M�a¢zwaa 5Z)"�w r-¢ -LL zm...u0..1 r- a 0Q S r-Jh.J - <Q Om J-Q -U7 alw —471— 0 0 8 TM O ti • • N] 0 N 0 57,855.00 1 $ 69 e9 >- Y CO N 0 0) 2 w w a 0 0 O 2 5 0 2 w ❑ a x r- 0 W ❑ 0 a co 6 ¢ w< cew wm om pa fC w 2 4 N 0 5 w Q CC D LL ❑ ¢6 as ce wa om aN Ww m▪ a W 2 aw ma 0 ¢ U QD Oz co0 P w w Q 0 0 1!) t0 N 69 f'1 m 69 a z 2 0 2 0 w ❑ 0 ¢ x 1- �r w 'a fY a ran 2 0 1- 6 a Q 1r w� CCU 0¢ zx ma 00w 70 05 ❑ 0. 22 aw zw Re � Cwt U m ai 4 W 0 M 89 0 2 2 0 2 w ❑ ❑ x r ❑ 0 w b a a N Q N 2 0 4- U w U w a N ❑ 2 ¢ J Q W0 ❑W W 2 w= Om z OW z w w U t5 J z zw _-J 0a ZU LO 0 ❑ t9 0 N 43,891.90 1$ w 0 0 10 lY W 0 a/ n9 co 2 0 F 6 Q ❑ 2 N h• Eoz zw w 5 za h Ww ga W ❑ WO Z• • • ¢❑ 17 - 2 za z� N❑ w w❑ 70 O W [/f a'W Q LL a e9 0 m 69 lV 0) O1 W N TOTAL BASE BID (ITEMS 1 -s) EXHIBIT "C" 1 PROJECT BUDGET O.N. STEVENS PROCESS MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION AND AUTOMATION IMPROVEMENTS Project No. 8600 July 20, 2010 FUNDS AVAILABLE: Water CIP (Three -Year Total) *Previous Years' CIP $2,300,000.00 $893,700.00 $3,193,700.00 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction (KST Electric) $1,82$,992.39 Contingencies $182,899.00 Consultant Fees: *Consultant - Bath Engineering (Original Contract & Amd. No. 1) $445,600.00 Consultant - Bath Engineering Amd. No. 2 $377,675.00 *Consultant - Freese and Nichols Inc. $44,400.00 Reimbursements: Contract Adminstration (Contract Preparation /Award /Admin) Engineering Services (Project Mgt/Construction Mgt) Construction Observation Services (included in Consultant Services) Finance Issuance Miscellaneous (Printing, Advertising, etc.) TOTAL $41,152.00 $64,01 5.00 $0.00 $22,862.00 $9,145.00 $3,01 6,740.39 FUNDS REMAINING $176,959.61 *The original contract and Amendment No. 1 with Bath Engineering and the contract with Freese and Nichols Inc. were included in previous years' CIP. EXHIBIT "D" Page 1 of 1 File : \ Hpraject \councilexhibits\exh$600c.dwg O.N. Stevens Process Monitoring instrumentation and Automation improvements 173 CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT DRAw D rENGWEER NG, smS PAGE: toff Dart 7/9/2010 Ap oIo 'OZ Ajnr r) 0 c uon.eluasaad 1r3. "15 0 la- 'Ea m < E E •-p m 0 vi z z < cu -a 0 ri; 0 Z G� � M Z covr� o�� 0 a 33 O Z • • • • 10 c rD et 0 T) 17 mo a 03 0:3 ... .. g in a CD n n rf Me r4, n 03 n � � CD g- 0 ma 0.. °`q rD F • • • • 03 0 >IT IT* [D 2 • a) iymi * g. CET fml)N -1 aQ 0 m-I 12 0 z� 0_ tp+a) Ts lari 3 _I* rD C -0 = (D 1F 3 12 no CD O Er vi vi vi g {D 0 0 5 CrQ 0 ep CD 3 -477- as B v v} c ra rD 0 c Q�(D �= cam_ 3� n -, rr+ 0 v rQ CI CD =. v r+ o �. CL a CD cr ,� co m 0 r+ ro 5. n Q. CU r* e-1- I* as ro VI oil v o0 ' om a- c �• . -479- punoi2 pes uualsAs2uiao4iuow lucid 4uauuleaal aaa.e j • • • • Z p V I rF el a a3 o = 0 ri) a) -a * _. -1 0 nr* n 1 u MDJ 0'n R Rs 0 .13 r+ cu 0 n o O D _.ra 3 c u 3 8 BP -9, *< n. n n a rP ED Vi vi o — ci.MLn •< z n D. a, a is 3 a � 3 < , 5,-13 3° rit rD 7- -I a) a = r+ „,a 0 -481- • m -a as 3 a i =r ; C C I 1 5 CA m CU (4 v) 1-1. 3 tD 3 f1 a -i■ rt �q CD no -I a o Z ra (ah CD • a a' a 1 — 0 0 3 • o CL r1 —I 0 ro 0, n rD n r+ • rD 3 n 3n cn -- • m co m 3 4 b+ 3 (D CI CU - 0 n -� —' • rr+ -' -5. o r* O 3 3 rD 3 ✓ + 3 CD 0 0 • • th � cn raQ iZ ro c 5 *0P� �.� ff+ (D c o m ° �D �, -0 0_ _ o cuo cv N -% e+ E 'C 0 cu ca. 3 n 3 � o �+ 0 �o = or) rD -483- nuatuanoadull dIMSNO • • • • • • • • • • ,,_ 0 0 . -, g „I> az ..3- g a- 3— c> a., a< mo- 0 c c3 fD" 0 tiD2 36+ C = < CD C N• • 1' 0- r+ -a rte+ ±. �" -�f fa� %in 3 3 mt sot 0 0.) g i �. n Vq !D otu a) n-� o 1 N. (D D fp = to CU cu a. Q 0 , t"F rD rr9 :<- = 5 ro ro O two_ cu fu _ , r, �• 0 0) 0 2 �. g 4 �+ .9 FDI CU Dir fi 17° a) = 5. ma • 'J.. crl D 0 n• (D p p cn = tu co ei cp* a_ .4 fD in a -1 < Er Vi a 3 n s2 o = in a -• — �0 1< cm -485- CL xi O ( *e* 3 a) 4. • t 0 .— — CD n +ro 0 D) N 0 ma iA D 0 CL -z cu 0,ct. r _ s. sti. ti to 0 =' 74 011 i^ n cn D � 0 mn • F r~ v, 0 0 {D fD n n r• n MI 0-I 0 n rD V)3 rr D- U n - n o a 0 • 0 an Mfp n � -1 to • �? 0 m m0 0 o' 0• 74 CL =vs av aQ m cf. Er 1 tn rF co FD— a) 0- a) 3 Qq [D 3 3 a0 5caoo °o0o C'1 cas. E a m 2, CD = s w N� 0 CD co co. m a @ 0 a a•0Zc= m CD 0 CD 0 aca o -• o 515‘) ,..h rt. CO -0 n o- o. 0 oa m n ( 0 o 3 z co v TP -% o w� -o0 N a7 -A CO N) G7 G") CO R -P.-% N) CO V -' -CO 0 In a7 -OD co co 0 Cri N cn ti a cn o c) r in o oa0000i�w —coo 0o0oao.prp 1 O. fD N W co -co C(ID w 0 0 0 voo Q Q 0 fD r• -493- iv -I o `• fD n emp VI n CD 0 c CD tsuoi ;sanb -495- 32 AGENDA MEMORANDUM July 20, 2010 SUBJECT: Corpus Christi Bayfront Development Implementation Plan Phase 1 (Shoreline Realignment Phase 1) - Project No. 6279 AGENDA ITEM: Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Change Order 23 to the construction contract with Haas Anderson Construction of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the amount not exceed $84,379.65 for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $15,540,947.00 for twelve months extended landscape maintenance with option to renew for 12 months and installation of skate stopper devices for the Bayfront Development Plan — Phase 1 Improvements. ISSUES: Extended landscape maintenance will provide the ability to maintain the plantings and lessen the staffing requirement for the Parks and Recreation Tourist District during FY2010 -2011. Installation of "skate stopper" devices will prevent further damage to the Park's benches and precast that has incurred some damage due to "grinding" by roller blades and skate boards. FUNDING: Funding is available from the Bayfront Development 2009 CIP Fund. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the motions as presented. Pete Anaya, P.E. Director of Engineering Services 361- 826 -3781 peteanAcctexas.com Michael Morris Parks and Recreation Services 826 -3464 MichaelMo@ectexas.com ADDITIONAL SUPPORT MATERIAL Exhibit A. Background Information Exhibit A -1 Previous Actions Exhibit A -2 Matrix of Required Maintenance Exhibit 8. Change Order Summary Exhibit C. Location Map 1. WoMEIKEVIN5IGEMBayfroMMasterPlarAPhasei1CO23Memo .doc —499— Page 1 of 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION CHANGE ORDER: The change order will authorize 12 months of landscape maintenance with an option to renew for 12 months, and installation of "Skate Stopper" devices on pre -cast and wooden benches to prevent further damage by skate boards and roller blades. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Landscape Maintenance: The cost of approval of the additional 12 months of landscape maintenance will reduce the investment that the Parks and Recreation Department (Tourist District) must initially fund for the facility. This will allow the City time for City revenues to return to a more normal level before fully staffing the facility. Parks and Recreation Tourist District personnel will continue daily maintenance and operation of the water feature, trash receptacles and litter in the Park. They will also operate the irrigation as required when the landscape maintenance firm is not on site. The landscape firm will perform the following tasks during each maintenance visit: • Mow, edge, and blow all lawn areas. • Trim plants and trees to remove dead vegetation or for accessibility. • Apply post emergent herbicide to kill unwanted weeds. • Pick up litter. • Regulate Sprinkler Timer for optimum watering. • Spray pesticides to control insects or fungus as needed after other means have been tried. The firm has proposed to maintain the landscaping based on weekly and biweekly visits as follows: Weekly March — October 34 visits Biweekly November — February 8 visits Total 42 visits The following additional work will be performed in the months of March, June, and September: • Apply lawn fertilizer with pre - emergent herbicide. • Install hardwood mulch in bare areas to maintain 2" depth. During January, the maintenance firm will: • Cut back native grasses to remove winter appearance. The change order also provides for up to three additional site visits during the year upon request of the Parks and Recreation Department. This will allow landscape work when required and provide assistance for special events. The total cost of this item is $66,677.50. t: 1HOME1KEV! NS1GEN1BayfrontMasterPlanlPhase11CO23Bkgt .Ooc Exhibit A Page 1 of 3 Daily maintenance activity is required to maintain the park in clean, good condition. The required daily activities for Parks Department Tourist District personnel include: • assisting the public; • cleaning restrooms; • daily landscape irrigation; • emptying trash receptacles; • ensuring compliance with park regulations; • operating the water feature; and • Picking up litter. A complete list of duties are outlined the attached matrix. The matrix illustrates the activities of the Parks and Recreation Department and contractor under the change order. See Exhibit A -2, Skate Stoppers: Roller blades and skate boards have created some damage to pre -cast benches and wooden benches in the park. The architect has recommended installation of "Skate Stopper" devices which are installed on architectural features. The devices will be installed on approximately 2 -ft intervals. The devices are a "tombasil" casting (white bronze alloy) approximately 6 -in long and 1 -in wide. Anchoring hardware (tamperproof anchors and screws" will be made of 316 stainless steel. The use of bronze and stainless steel materials is required to ensure its long term durability in the Bayfront environment. The devices is designed to cover the edge of architectural elements to prevent "grinding" of the edge of benches by roller bladders and skate boarders. A total of approximately 168 devices will be installed on pre -cast benches and 82 an wooden benches or a total of 250 devices. Skate Stoppers are not mass produced architectural features. Each device is cast at the time an order is received. Each casting is based on the style of device selected with only the number ordered being cast. The factory price for 250 devices is $9,816.40 plus $339.60 for shipping from California to Corpus Christi. Each device requires a tamper proof anchor, 2- tamper proof screws, epoxy, epoxy primer, and miscellaneous materials costing $2,865.17. Labor to install the devices will cost $2,865.17. The contractor's mark -up for overhead and profit is $2,308.98 (15 %). In summary, the price of this item is based on Skate Stopper Cost $9,816.40 Shipping (Ca. to Corpus Christi, Tx.) 339.60 Anchors, screws, epoxy, epoxy primer, etc. $2,865.17 Labor $2,372.00 Subtotal $15,393.17 Overhead & Profit $2,308.98 Total $17,702.15 H:\ HOMEIKEViNSIGENIBayjrontMasternan \Phasei1CO23Bk5M1Z Exhibit A Page 2of3 The devices should arrive in early August subject to approval of the change order. The contractor anticipates all devices will be installed prior to mid- August. The contractor will start installation on the water feature about 4:00 a.m. each day that work is occurring. Installation of the devices requires time for epoxy used in the installation to cure. The curing time will delay starting the water feature each day during installation until noon. The wooden benches may be used immediately after each device is installed. All of the changes have been reviewed by the Consultant, and their sub - consultants. They recommend proceeding with the modifications as presented. FUNDING: Funds are available from Bayfront 2009 CIP Fund. RECOMMENDATION: The project consultant and City staff recommend approval of the motion as presented. H :1H OM EIK E V I N 51GE N1Bayfro ntMaste rP l a n T h as a 11CO2 3Bkg an oc Exhibit A Page 3 of 3 Exhibit A -1 Page I of 5 , PREVIOUS ACTIONS PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION: 1. December 16, 2003 — Resolution Authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with the RTA in the amount of $20,000 for the Bayfront Master Plan. 2, December 16, 2003 — Resolution Authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with the Downtown Management District in the amount of $20,000 for the Bayfront Master Plan. 3. December 16, 2003 — Resolution Authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with the Metropolitan Planning Organization in the amount of $20,000 for the Bayfront Master Plan. 4. December 16, 2003 — Resolution Authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with the Port of Corpus Christi in the amount of $20,000 for the Bayfront Master Plan. 5. December 16, 2003 — Ordinance appropriating $20,000 from the RTA into Park CIP Fund No. 3280; and appropriating $20,000 from the Downtown Management District into the Park CIP Fund No. 3280; and appropriating $20,000 from the Metropolitan Planning Organization into the Park CIP Fund No. 3280 for the Bayfront Master Plan; and amending the Capital Budget FY 2002 -2003 adopted by Ordinance No. 025144 by increasing appropriations by $60,000; and declaring an emergency. 6. December 16, 2003 — Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 4 with Thompson Ventulett and Stainback and Associates, Inc. for planning services associated with development of a Bayfront Master Plan. 7. July 20, 2004 — Public Hearing to consider amending the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Corpus Christi by amending the South Central Area Development Plan to include the Bayfront Master Plan; amending related elements of the Comprehensive Plan including the Urban Transportation Plan. 8. July 20, 2005 — Ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Corpus Christi ( "the City ") by amending the South Central Area Development Plan to include the Bayfront Master Plan; amending related elements of the Comprehensive Plan including the Urban Transportation Plan; providing for severance; providing for publication. 9. July 27, 2004 — Motion to amend prior to second reading the ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan of the City by amending the South Central Area Development Plan to include the Bayfront Master Plan, by including in Policy Statement G.3 a description of Shoreline Boulevard as an arterial street with four to six travel lanes between Buford Street and the Bayfront Convention Center 10. July 27, 2004 -- Second Reading - Ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Corpus Christi ( "the City ") by amending the South Central Area Development Plan to include the Bayfront Master Plan; amending related elements of the Comprehensive Plan including the Urban Transportation Plan. 11. November 2, 2004 — Resolution expressing official intent to reimburse costs of the 2004 Bond Capital Improvement Projects (Resolution No. 026015). H: 1HOME\ KEVINSI GEN1BayfrontMasterPlan \Phase11CO23Canli n ,ctionsExhA -1.dac 12. November 9, 2004 - Ordinance canvassing returns and declaring the results of the Special Election held on November 2, 2004, in the City of Corpus Christi for the adoption of five bond propositions; adoption of a permanent ad valorem tax freeze on residents homesteads of persons 65 years of age or older or disabled persons and eligible spouses; and adoption of seven amendments to the Charter of the City of Corpus Christi (Ordinance No. 026022). 13. March 29, 2005 - Approval of the FY 2004 -2005 Capital Improvement Budget for $178,074,800 (Ordinance 026188). 14. August 23, 2005 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a Contract for Professional Services with Gignac & Associates, Architects of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the amount of $804,515 for the Bayfront Development Plan Phase 1 (Bond Issue 2004) (Motion No. 2005 -264). 15. February 21, 2006 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 1 with Gignac & Associates, Architects of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the amount of $65,160 for boundary and topographic surveying for the Bayfront Development Plan Phase 1 (Bond Issue 2004) (Motion No. 2005 -264) (Motion No. 2006 -038). 16. March 28, 2006 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a Contract for Geotechnical Services with Fugro South, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the amount of $32,360 for the Bayfront Development Plan Phase 1 (BOND ISSUE 2004) (Motion 2006 -091). 17. March 27, 2007 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 3 for Professional Services with Gignac & Associates, Architects of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the amount of $1,380,079 for a restated not to exceed fee of $2,255,314 for the Bayfront Development Plan Phase 1 (BOND ISSUE 2004) (Motion 2007 -082). 18. August 19, 2008 — a. Resolution Expressing Official Intent To Reimburse Costs Of Corpus Christi Bayfront Development Implementation Plan Phase 1 (Shoreline Realignment Phase 1) (Resolution No. 027812), b. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a construction contract with Haas Anderson Construction Ltd., of Corpus Christi, Texas in an amount not to exceed $14,622,748.00 for the Bayfront Development Implementation Plan — Phase 1 Improvements for the Base Bid and Additive Alternates 1, 2, 3, and 4 (Motion 2008 -222). 19. November 18, 2008 - Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Change Order No. 3 to the construction contract with Haas Anderson Construction, Ltd., of Corpus Christi, Texas in an amount not to exceed $129,005.17 for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $14,791,114.17 for water line revisions and tie -in beyond the original construction limits for the Bayfront Development Implementation Plan — Phase 1 Improvements (Motion 2008 -308). 20. May 26, 2009 — Resolution by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas directing publication of intention to issue Combination Tax and Revenue Certificates of Obligation in an amount up to $8,500,000 for the purpose of financing costs associated with making permanent public improvements to Holly Road, Bayfront Development Implementation Plan Phase 1 (Shoreline Realignment Phase 1), and the Rodd Field Public Improvement District; complying with the H: 1H0ME \KEVINSIGEN1BayfrontMasterPla nlPhase1 1CO23Cocgr64rActionsExhA -1.doc Exhibit A -1 Page 2 of 5 requirements contained in the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2 -12; and providing an effective date (Resolution No.028186). 21. June 30, 2009 -- Ordinance authorizing the issuance of "City of Corpus Christi, Texas, Combination Tax and Limited Pledge Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 2009" in and amount not to exceed $8,500,000 for the purpose of financing costs associated with making permanent public improvements to Holly Road, Bayfront Development Implementation Plan Phase 1 (Shoreline Realignment Phase 1), and the Rodd Field Public Improvement District; providing for the payment of said Certificates by the levy of an ad valorem tax upon all taxable property within the City and further securing said Certificates by a lien on and pledge of the Pledge Revenues of the Solid Waste System; providing the terms and conditions of said Certificates and resolving other matters incident and relating to the issuance, payment, security, sale, and delivery of said Certificates, including the approval and distribution of an official statement; authorizing the execution of a paying agentlregistrar agreement and a purchase contract; complying with the requirements of the letter of representations with the Depository Trust Company; delegating the authority to the Mayor and certain members of City staff to execute certain documents relating to the sale of the Certificates; enacting other provisions incident and related to the subject and purpose of this ordinance; and providing an effective date (Ordinance No. 028223). 22. September 29, 2009 - Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Change Order 11 to the construction contract with Haas Anderson Construction of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the amount not exceed $321,725.68 for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $15,228,511.94 for wind turbine modifications to achieve 120 MPH wind load rating, various modifications associated with the interactive water feature, minor kiosklrestroom building modifications, and miscellaneous other changes for the Bayfront Development Implementation Plan — Phase 1 Improvements (Motion 2009 -281). PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION: 1. August 26. 2004 - Distribution of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2004 -03 Bond Issue 2004 Projects to 175 engineering firms (70 Local and 105 non - local). 2. March 25, 2005 - Addendum No. 1 to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2004 -03 Bond Issue 2004 Projects to 175 engineering firms (70 local and 105 non - Local). 3. April 13, 2005 - Addendum No. 2 to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2004 -03 Bond Issue 2004 Projects to 175 engineering firms (70 local and 105 non - local). 4. July 27, 2006 — Amendment No. 2 for additional boundary topographic surveying with Gignac & Associates, Architects of Corpus Christi, Texas, in the amount of $5,520 for the Bayfront Development Plan Phase 1 (Bond Issue 2004). 5. September 29, 2008 — Authorization of Change Order No. 1 with Haas Anderson Construction in the amount of $18,100.00 for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $14,640,848.00 for temporary fencing to allow continued pedestrian access on apron adjoining construction site. 6. October 31, 2008 Authorization of Change Order No. 2 with Haas Anderson Construction in the amount of $21,261.44 for a restated not to exceed contract H: 1HOMEIKEVIN51GE MBE' yfrontMasterPIan1Phase11CO23Coa' cActionsExhA -1.doc Exhibit A -1 Page 3 of 5 amount of $14,662,109.44 for relocating primary electrical conduit @ Resaca and Shoreline, temporary tie -in to existing main water line, decreasing the water to cement ratio for street concrete pavement and providing a new foundation & base for relocating the Manjarris sculpture. 7. December 22, 2008 - Authorization of Change Order No. 4 with Haas Anderson Construction in the amount of $17,743.13 for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $14,808,857.74 to reduce perforated Park HDPE drain pipe size from 15 -in to 10 -in, provide cement stabilized subgrade in Phase 1A work area, remove abandoned cast iron wastewater force main, provide additional waterline revisions at Resaca Street, Shoreline Boulevard and Port of Corpus Christi Building, and revise top of manholes and additional pavers. 8. March 10, 2009 - Authorization of Change Order No. 5 with Haas Anderson Construction in the amount of $24,478.00 for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $14,833,335.74 for revisions to site electrical and telecom plan, modification of overflow trench and provision of inlet extension at Power Street sculpture. 9. March 24, 2009 - Authorization of Change Order No. 6 with Haas Anderson Construction in the amount of $21,268.73 for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $14,854,604.47 for revisions for relocation and addition of bollards, and addition of thrust blocks at the Interactive Water Feature. 10. April 19, 2009 - Authorization of Change Order No. 7 with Haas Anderson Construction in the deductive amount of $20,881.70 for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $14,833,722.77 to provide the alternate exposed aggregate paving, additional concrete pads for benches, cement stabilization, revision of landscape edging, and additional park drainage. 11. June 16, 2009 - Authorization of Change Order No. 8 with Haas Anderson Construction in the amount of $24,401.84 for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $14,858,722.77 to provide for substitution of alternate planting soil mix, sidewalk subgrade modifications, relocation of street light junction boxes and revision of waterproofing for kiosk pump room. 12. June 30, 2009 - Authorization of Change Order No. 9 with Haas Anderson Construction in the amount of $23,842.29 for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $14,881,966.90 for temporary ADA walkway /ramp for Port of Corpus Christi Building, modification of solenoid valves for interactive water feature, addition of exposed white aggregate at kiosk entrance, and increase storm water reinforced concrete pipe from 15 -in to 18 -in diameter diameter. 13. July 14, 2009 - Authorization of Change Order No. 10 with Haas Anderson Construction in the amount of $24,819.36 for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $14,906,786.26 for storm drain piping around kiosk and revise size of wind turbine poles to achieve a 120 m.p.h. wind rating, 14. September 30, 2009 - Authorization of Change Order No. 12 with Haas Anderson Construction in the amount of $13,094.22 for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $15,241,606.16 to install electrical conduit in island in front of American Bank Center, replace steel sleeves with HDPE sleeves for water feature, and deletion of pavers /addition of exposed aggregate at sidewalk on south kiosk. 15. October 23, 2009 Authorization of Change Order No. 14 with Haas Anderson 1-1:1F1 0 MEW E V I N51GE N1BayfrontMaste rpi a n1Pha se 11CO23C CID 5 rerepactio ns ExhA -1. d ac Exhibit A -1 Pase4of5 Construction in the amount of $23,742.74 for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $15,265,178.90 for expansion control joints at the interactive water feature slabs. 16. November 6, 2009 - Authorization of Change Order No. 15 with Haas Anderson Construction in the amount of $716.18 for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $15,265,795.08 for anti - graffiti sealer for pre -cast benches, storm drain line from kiosk hatch, deletion of waterproofing admixture from kiosk basement concrete, deletion of copper flashing and extension of MBS roofing. 17. November 12, 2009 - Authorization of Change Order No. 16 with Haas Anderson Construction in the amount of $23,772.22 for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $15,314,010.21 additional detectable sidewalk pavers, relocation of turbine equipment into kiosk basement, and deletion of slot drain /addition of area drain and piping a kiosk plaza. 18. December 18, 2009 - Authorization of Change Order No. 17 with Haas Anderson Construction in the amount of $20,585.30 for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $15,334,595.51 anti - graffiti sealer for park elements (bollards, additional benches, steps). 19. February 3, 2010 - Authorization of Change Order No. 18 with Haas Anderson Construction in the amount of $24,106.53 for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $15,358,702.04 for raising existing sidewalk to match grade of new sidewalks, revise drinking fountain type and replace Miradore fountain, and provide interconnect meter base for turbines required by AEP. 20. February 10, 2010 - Authorization of Change Order No. 19 with Haas Anderson Construction in the amount of $24,761.78 for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $15,383,463.80 for deletion of kiosk basement suspended ceiling and paint exposed concrete structure, revise turbine lighting to uplighting fixtures, and provide electrical power to infrared plumbing sensors. 21. March 8, 2010 - Authorization of Change Order No. 20 with Haas Anderson Construction in the amount of $23,807.33 for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $15,407,271.13 for 3 -in hot mix on Shoreline in front of Chamber of Commerce Building, add four park type water hydrants requested by Buc Commission, and sidewalk ramp revisions at Shoreline and Power Street. 22. June 10, 2010 - Authorization of Change Order No. 21 with Haas Anderson Construction in the amount of $24,781.29 for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $15,432,052.42 for a variety of additive and deductive change items including landscape and irrigation modifications, joint sealing between sidewalk and seawall, additional water line, safety ladder -up post, modification of IWF operational system, and tamper resistant cover for IWF cut off switch. 23. June 23, 2010 - Authorization of Change Order No. 22 with Haas Anderson Construction in the amount of $24,514.93 for a restated not to exceed contract amount of $15,456,567.35 for multiple windstorm certifications required by Development Services, additional water feature signs, and additional equipment for water feature carbon dioxide system. H: 1H0ME1KEVIN5IGEN1I3ayfrontMasterPlan !Phase11CO23C a' ado nsExhA -1.doc Exhibit A -1 Page 5 of 5 Exhibit A -2 Matrix of Required Maintenance Bayfront Development Phase 1 Maintenance Duties Landscape Maintenance Contractor Tourist District Staff • Visits o Weekly: March — October (34) o Biweekly: November — February (8) ■ Mow, edge and blow all lawn areas ■ Trim plants and trees to remove dead vegetation • Apply post emergent herbicide to kill unwanted weeds • Pick up litter • Regulate sprinkler timer for optimum watering ■ Spray pesticides to control insects or fungus as needed • Apply pre - emergent herbicide and install mulch (March, June, and September) • Reduce native grasses (January) FY 2011 - $66,677.50 • Daily maintenance routine with increased visits during March — October, and special events • Sanitation o Swamp cans, pick up stray litter o Sweep walkways, sidewalks, seawall o Clean kiosk, platforms, water feature o Power wash with steam every 6 -8 wks • Water Feature o Preventive Maintenance (strainer baskets, micro filters, backwash filters) o Monitor and adjust chlorinator, CO2, line pressures and delta o Restock/replenish chemical feed systems ■ Horticulture o Remove clippings, grass, etc from water feature, sidewalks, seawall, etc. o Repair broken limbs, fronds and clearance issues between visits a Spot mow, remove weeds for special events ❑ Monitor, operate and maintain irrigation system o Reduce planting area and re -sod (cactus) ■ Security ❑ Patrol area, monitor compliance o Special event monitoring FY 2011 $300,000 -508- Exhibit A -2 Page 1 of 1 DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY SHEET JULY 20, 2010 PROJECT: CHRISTI BAYFRONT DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PHASE 1 Project No. 6279 APPROVED: COUNCIL MOTION 2008 -222 APPROVED 08/19/2008 CONTRACTOR: Haas Anderson Construction, Ltd. 1402 Holly Road Corpus Christi, TX 78417 TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT 25% Limit Amount Change Order No. 1 (09/29/08) Change Order No. 2 (10/31/08) Change Order No. 3 (11118108) Change Order No. 4 (12/22/08) Change Order No. 5 (03110109) Change Order No. 6 (03124109) Change Order No. 7 (04119109) Change Order No. 8 (06/16/09) Change Order No. 9 (03/30/09) Change Order No. 10 (07/28/09) Change Order No. 11 (09122109) Change Order No. 12 (10/05/09) Change Order No. 13 (10/14/09) Change Order No. 14 (10/23/09) Change Order No. 15 (11/06/09) Change Order No. 16 (11/13/09) Change Order No. 17 (12/18/09) Change Order No. 18 (02/03/10) Change Order No. 19 (02/10/10) Change Order No. 20 (03108110) Change Order No. 21 (In Process) Change Order No. 22 (In Process) Change Order No. 23 (07/13/10) Total —509— $14,622,748.00 3,655,587.06 18,100.00 21,261.44 129,007.17 17,743.13 24,478.00 21,268.73 (20,881.70) 24,401.84 23,842.29 24,819.36 321,725.68 13,094.22 23,472.74 716.18 24,442.91 23,772.22 20,585.30 24,106.53 24,761.76 23,807.33 24,781.29 24, 514.93 84,379.65 $918,199.00 = 6.28% < 25% Exhibit B Page 1 of 1 CHANGE ORDER Department of Engineering Services City of Corpus Christi, Texas CHANGE ORDER NO: 23 FUNDING SOURCE: Project No. 6279 CONTRACT TIME: 425 C.D. Operating Department: Engi eerinq Services DATE: June 28, 2010 . • Name of Project: Bavfront Development Implementation Plan — Phase 1 — Project No. 6279 Contractor: Haas - Anderson Construction, Ltd. CHANGE AS FOLLOWS: PR -102 Provide Skate Deterrents at PC Benches & Wood Benches PR -108 Provide Landscape Maintenance for a Period of One (1) Year Plus Three (3) Special Visits (with Additional One (1) Year Landscape Maintenance Option) Total: $17,702.15 ADD $66,677.50 ADO $84,379.65 ADD Why was this change necessary? (If left off the plans and specifications, explain why). Reference attached Proposal Requests for details. How can similar changes be avoided in the future? Reference attached Proposal Requests for details. A. CONTRACT PRICE B. TOTAL CHANGE ORDER (incl. current) C. NEW CONTRACT PRICE D. THIS CHANGE ORDER E. PERCENT TOTAL CHANGE (B /A) F. PREVIOUS ADDN'L TIME AUTHORIZED G. ADDN'L CONTRACT TIME THIS CHANGE ORDER H. TOTAL ADDITIONAL TIME $ 14,622,748.00 $ 918,199.00 $ 15,540,947.00 $ 84,379.65 6.28% 301 CD 0 CD 301 CD CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS By: City Engineer APPROVED: Operating Department Project Manager CONTRACTOR By: Title: Director of Management & Budget Legal Department -510- Exhibit B Page 2 of 2 H: \Home\Mproject\Councr ;lexh \exh62 79b. d wg CORPUS CHRISTI BA YFRONT DEVELOP- MENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PHASE 1 (Shoreline Realignment Ph mi) CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRIST!, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES PAGE: 7 of 1 DATE 07/13/2070 == 33 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM PRESENTATION AGENDA ITEM: New Economic Development website demonstration STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name Title /Position Department 1. Emily Martinez Interim Director of Economic Development 2. 3. OUTSIDE PRESENTER(S): Name 1. Chad Magill 2. 3. Title /Position Organization Identify Theft Solutions BACKGROUND: The City engaged identity Theft Solutions to develop a new Economic Development website. The website entails information on resources, incentives, successful projects, demographics and assets of the community. It is designed to be user friendly and will include the most current Economic Development information. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: None PowerPoint Supplemental Information -515- Emily Ma i ez, Int Economic Develop emilym(cctexas.com 826 -3312 rector