Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet City Council - 05/24/2016
Corpus Christi 1201 Leopard Street - f' Corpus Christi,TX 78401 i cctexas.com Meeting Agenda - Final City Council Tuesday, May 24,2016 11:30 AM Council Chambers Public Notice - - THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE PROHIBITED IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. Members of the audience will be provided an opportunity to address the Council at approximately 12:00 p.m., or the end of the Council Meeting, whichever is earlier. Please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. Your presentation will be limited to three minutes. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Si Usted desea dirigirse al Concilio y cree que su ingl6s es limitado, habra un interprete ingl6s-espanol en todas las juntas del Concilio para ayudarle. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or services are requested to contact the City Secretary's office(at 361-826-3105) at least 48 hours in advance so that appropriate arrangements can be made. A. Mayor Nelda Martinez to call the meeting to order. B. Invocation to be given by Dorothy Dundas, Texas Apostolic Prayer Network. C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States to be led by Rudy Bentancourt, Director of Housing & Community Development. D. City Secretary Rebecca Huerta to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. E. Proclamations /Commendations 1. 16-0565 Proclamation declaring May 25, 2016, "Inspire Magazine Day". Commendation to the Convention and Visitors Bureau and the Quintanilla Family for"Fiesta de la Flor". F. PUBLIC COMMENT FROM THE AUDIENCE ON MATTERS NOT SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA WILL BE HEARD AT APPROXIMATELY 12:00 P.M. PLEASE LIMIT PRESENTATIONS TO THREE MINUTES. A recording is made of the meeting; therefore, please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. If you choose to speak during this public comment period regarding an item on the agenda, you may do so. You will not be allowed to speak again, however, when the Council is considering the item. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Corpus Christi Page 1 Printed on 5/23/2016 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final May 24,2016 PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT PROHIBITS THE CITY COUNCIL FROM RESPONDING AND DISCUSSING YOUR COMMENTS AT LENGTH. THE LAW ONLY AUTHORIZES THEM TO DO THE FOLLOWING: 1. MAKE A STATEMENT OF FACTUAL INFORMATION. 2. RECITE AN EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO THE INQUIRY. 3. ADVISE THE CITIZEN THAT THIS SUBJECT WILL BE PLACED ON AN AGENDA AT A LATER DATE. PER CITY COUNCIL POLICY, NO COUNCIL MEMBER, STAFF PERSON, OR MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE SHALL BERATE, EMBARRASS, ACCUSE, OR SHOW ANY PERSONAL DISRESPECT FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE STAFF, COUNCIL MEMBERS, OR THE PUBLIC AT ANY COUNCIL MEETING. THIS POLICY IS NOT MEANT TO RESTRAIN A CITIZEN'S FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. G. CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS / UPDATE ON CITY OPERATIONS: a. OTHER H. MINUTES: 2. 16-0564 Regular Meeting of May 17, 2016. Attachments: Minutes- May 17, 2016 I. BOARD &COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: 3. 16-0533 Commission on Children and Youth Mayor's Fitness Council Attachments: Commission on Children and Youth.pdf Mayor's Fitness Council.pdf J. EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION: For administrative convenience, certain of the agenda items are listed as motions, resolutions, or ordinances. If deemed appropriate, the City Council will use a different method of adoption from the one listed;may finally pass an ordinance by adopting it as an emergency measure rather than a two reading ordinance;or may modify the action specified. A motion to reconsider may be made at this meeting of a vote at the last regular, or a subsequent special meeting;such agendas are incorporated herein for reconsideration and action on any reconsidered item. K. CONSENT AGENDA: (ITEMS 4 - 19) NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: The following items are consent motions, resolutions, and ordinances of a routine or administrative nature. The Council has been furnished with background and support material on each item, and/or it has been discussed at a previous meeting. All items will be acted upon by one vote without being discussed Corpus Christi Page 2 Printed on 5/23/2016 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final May 24,2016 separately unless requested by a Council Member or a citizen, in which event the item or items will immediately be withdrawn for individual consideration in its normal sequence after the items not requiring separate discussion have been acted upon. The remaining items will be adopted by one vote. 4. 16-0509 Resolution authorizing 3 Interlocal Agreements with local school districts to provide bus transportation for 2016 summer programs Resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute separate multi-year Interlocal Agreements with the Calallen Independent School District, the Corpus Christi Independent School District and the Flour Bluff Independent School District, to provide transportation services for summer youth recreation programs. Attachments: Agenda Memo-2016 Summer Interlocal Transportation Agreements Resolution -2016 Summer Transportation Agreements Interlocal Transportation Agreement-Calallen I.S.D. Interlocal Transportation Agreement-Corpus Christi I.S.D. Interlocal Transporation Agreement- Flour Bluff I.S.D. 5. 16-0518 Resolution authorizing request for beach cleaning and maintenance funding from Texas General Land Office for FY 2016-17 Resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to request continued financial assistance for beach cleaning and maintenance on North Padre Island and Mustang Island during FY 2016-2017 under the Texas General Land Office's Beach Cleaning and Maintenance Assistance Program. Attachments: Agenda Memo-2017 GLO Beach Maintenance Application Resolution -2017 GLO Beach Maintenance Application 6. 16-0488 Construction contract for Community Park Development and Improvements - Parker Park (Bond 2012) Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Ram-Bro Construction of Robstown, Texas in the amount of$363,559.50 for the Community Park Development and Improvements - Parker Park project for the base bid only for improvements to the existing park. (Bond 2012, Proposition 4). Attachments: Agenda Memo- Parker Park Project Budget- Parker Park.xlsx Location Map Parker Park.pdf Presentation Parker Park.pptx Form 1295-Ram-Bro- Parker Park E14005.pdf 7. 16-0425 Engineering Design Contract for the O. N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase I Corpus Christi Page 3 Printed on 5/23/2016 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final May 24,2016 Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an Engineering Design contract with LNV, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$95,467 for the O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase I for design, bid and construction phase services. Attachments: Agenda Memo-ONSWTP Sludge Prosect Budget-ONSWTP Sludge Location Map-ONSWTP Sludge Contract-ONSWTP Sludge Presentation -ONSWTP Sludge Form 1295-ONSWTP Sludge 8. 16-0491 Engineering construction contract for the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant Emissions and Odor Control Improvements Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a construction contract with J.S. Haren Company of Athens, Tennessee in the amount of$207,000 for the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant Emissions & Odor Control Improvements project for the Base Bid. Attachments: Agenda Memo-Greenwood WWTP.docx Prosect Budget-Greenwood WWTP.xls Location Map-Greenwood WWTP.pdf Presentation -Greenwood WWTP.pptx Form 1295-Greenwood WWTP.pdf 9. 16-0485 Service Agreement for Tire Disposal Service Motion approving a service agreement with Texas Land Reclamation LLC, dba UTW Tire Collection Services, Donna, Texas, for Used Tire Disposal Service in accordance with Bid Event No. 85, based on lowest responsive, responsible bid for an estimated annual expenditure of $112,134.00, of which $37,378.00 is required for the remainder of FY 2015-2016. The term of the contract will be for twelve months with options to extend for up to two additional twelve-month periods, subject to the approval of the Contractor and the City Manager or designee. Funds have been budgeted by the Fleet Maintenance Services and Solid Waste Departments in FY 2015-2016. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Used Tire Disposal Service Bid Tab- Used Tire Disposal Service Service Agreement Final -Used Tire Disposal Service 1295- Used Tire Disposal 10. 16-0371 Service Agreement for Security Guard and Bailiff Services for Municipal Court Corpus Christi Page 4 Printed on 5/23/2016 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final May 24,2016 Resolution finding the lowest responsive responsible bidder for commissioned security guard and bailiff services in response to Bid Event No. 95; awarding a service agreement to Deacon 10, LLC, of Euclid, Ohio, dba Premier Protective Services; and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a service agreement with the lowest responsible bidder for commissioned security guard and bailiff services. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Municipal Court Bid Tab- Municipal Court Resolution -Municipal Court Service Agreement- Municipal Court 11. 16-0493 Resolution to intervene in AEP's filing at the Public Utility Commission for a Distribution Cost Recovery Factor Resolution of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas to authorize intervention in the Public Utility Commission of Texas Docket No. 45787 regarding AEP Texas Central Company's application for approval of a distribution cost recovery factor to increase distribution rates within the city; finding that the city's reasonable rate case expenses shall be reimbursed by the company; finding that the meeting at which this resolution is passed is open to the public as required by law; requiring notice of this resolution to the company and legal counsel. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Resolution to intervene-2016 TCC DCRF (Docket No 45787)(1 Resolution to Intervene-2016 TCC DCRF (Docket No 45787) (6) 12. 16-0503 Resolution supporting the approval of bonds and a project relative to Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Resolution of the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, authorizing the Mayor to approve the issuance of(1) The New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation Student Housing Revenue Bonds (CHF - Collegiate Housing Island Campus, L.L.C. - Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi Island Campus Project) Series 2016A and to approve the project to be acquired with the proceeds of such Bonds, and (11) The New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation Student Housing Revenue Bonds (CHF - Collegiate Housing Corpus Christi 11, L.L.C. - Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Project) Series 2016A and to approve the project to be acquired with the proceeds of such Bonds Corpus Christi Page 5 Printed on 5/23/2016 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final May 24,2016 Attachments: Agenda Memo-TAMUCC Housing Bonds 051716 Resolution -TAMUCC Housing Bonds 051716 Feb 14 2006 Agenda Memo re Educational Media Foundation request for appro Internal Revenue Code Sec 147 Certificate of the Mayor for TAMUCC Bonds Presentation -TAMUCC Bonds 2016 13. 16-0463 Second Reading Ordinance - Proposed Amendment to MobilityCC by adopting the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization Strategic Plan for Active Mobility, Phase 1: Bicycle Mobility Plan (1st Reading 5/17/16) Ordinance amending MobilityCC, a transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Corpus Christi, by adopting the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) Strategic Plan for Active Mobility, Phase 1: Bicycle Mobility Plan; providing for severance; providing for a repealer clause; and providing for publication. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Bicycle Mobility Plan Ordinance with Exhibit- Bicycle Mobility Plan Presentation - MPO Bicycle Mobility Plan 14. 16-0504 Second Reading Ordinance - Rezoning property located at 1802 - 1820 Buford Street (1st Reading 5/17/16) Case No. 0416-02 The Salvation Army: A change of zoning from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District to the "CG-1/SP" General Commercial District with a Special Permit for a social service use. The property is described as being a 2.42 acre tract of land, being all of Lots 1-16, Block 6 and a 15 foot wide alley, Bay View No. 3, located between Hancock Avenue and Buford Avenue and between 16th Street and 15th Street. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (April 20, 2016): Denial of the change of zoning from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District to the "CG-1/SP" General Commercial District with a Special Permit and, in lieu thereof, approval of the "RS-6/SP" Single-Family 6 District with a Special Permit subject to nine conditions. Ordinance: Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC'), upon application by The Salvation Army ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to a 2.42 acre tract of land, being all of Lots 1-16, Block 6 and a 15 foot wide alley, Bay View No. 3, from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District to the "RS-6/SP" Single-Family 6 District with a Special Permit for a social service use; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. Corpus Christi Page 6 Printed on 5/23/2016 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final May 24,2016 Attachments: Agenda Memo-Salvation Army Ordinance (PC Recommendation)- RS-6 Special Permit-Salvation Army Presentation -Salvation Army Zoning Report-Salvation Army 15. 16-0505 Second Reading Ordinance - Rezoning property located at 22 - 26 and 34 -37 N. Country Club Drive, and 39, 41, 42, and 56 Country Club Drive (1st Reading 5/17/16) Case No. 0416-03 Magellan Terminals Holdings, LP: A change of zoning from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District, "ON" Office District and "RM-1" Multifamily 1 District to the "IL" Light Industrial District. The property is described as Lots 22-26, 34-42 and 55-56, Country Club Place, located on the north side of Interstate Highway 37, between Up River Road and Poth Lane. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (April 20, 2016): Approval of the change of zoning from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District, "ON" Office District and "RM-1" Multifamily 1 District to the "IL" Light Industrial District. Ordinance: Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC'), upon application by Magellan Terminals Holdings, LP ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to Lots 22-26, 34-42 and 55-56, Country Club Place, from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District, "ON" Office District and "RM-1" Multifamily 1 District to the "IL" Light Industrial District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Magellan Terminals Holdings, LP Ordinance - Magellan Terminals Holdings, LP Location Maps- Magellan Terminals Holdings Zoning Report-Magellan Terminals Holdings, LP 16. 16-0506 Second Reading Ordinance - Rezoning property located at 14102 Ambrosia Street (1st Reading 5/17/16) (3/4 vote required) Case No. 0316-06 Yun W. Hwang: A change of zoning from the "RM-3" Multifamily 3 District to the "RS-TH/PUD" Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Development Overlay. The property is described as Lot 1-B, Block 1, Padre Island No. 1, together with that portion of Estrada Drive (now closed), adjacent to said Lot 1-B, Block 1, Padre Island No. 1, located on the north side of Ambrosia Street between Scallop Street and Indigo Street. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (April 20, 2016): Corpus Christi Page 7 Printed on 5/23/2016 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final May 24,2016 Approval of the change of zoning from "RM-3" Multifamily 3 District to the "RS-TH/PUD" Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Development Overlay subject to nine conditions. Ordinance: Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC'), upon application by Yun W. Hwang ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to Lot 1-B, Block 1, Padre Island No. 1, together with that portion of Estrada Drive (now closed), adjacent to said Lot 1-B, Block 1, Padre Island No. 1, from the "RM-3" Multifamily 3 District to the "RS-TH/PUD" Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Development Overlay; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Island Bay Townhomes Ordinance - Island Bay Townhomes revised Presentation - Island Bay Townhomes Zoning Report-Island Bay Townhomes 17. 16-0494 Second Reading Ordinance -Accepting and appropriating additional Federal grant funds for the Houston High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) (1st Reading 5/17/16) Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept additional grant funding in the amount of$9,100.65 from the Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy, to support the Police Departments role in the Texas Coastal Corridor Initiative in the Houston High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA); and appropriating the $9,100.65 in the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund. Attachments: Agenda Memo- HIDTA add funds 05.17.2016 Ordinance - Additional HIDTA grant 2016 -Police Award -2016 HIDTA subaward signed 18. 16-0520 Second Reading Ordinance -Abandoning and vacating an existing blanket pipeline easement, located at the northeast corner of Staples Street and Wooldridge Drive (1st Reading 5/17/16) Ordinance abandoning and vacating of an existing blanket easement, located at Lokey Subdivision, Block 16D, Lot 5 that was recorded at Nueces County Deed Records Vol. 269 pages 249-250 and located north of Wooldridge Drive, and west of the South Staples Street public street right-of-way; and requiring the owner of the lot, Brimhall Enterprises, Inc., to comply with the specified conditions. Corpus Christi Page 8 Printed on 5/23/2016 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final May 24,2016 Attachments: Agenda Memo- Blanket Easement Ordinance- Lokey Subdivision Block 16D Lot 5.Blanket Easement(2)ALL Location Maps- Blanket Easement Gas Department 19. 16-0529 Second Reading Ordinance -Approving agreement and appropriating funds for the construction of a sanitary sewer trunk line, force main and lift station located on the southeast corner of South Padre Island Drive and Old Brownsville Road (1st Reading 5/17/16) Ordinance authorizing city manager or designee to execute a sanitary sewer trunk line, force main and lift station construction and reimbursement agreement ("Agreement") with Peterson Properties, Ltd., ("Developer"), for the construction of a sanitary sewer trunk line, force main and lift station and appropriating $911,341.24 from the No. 4220 Sanitary Sewer Trunk System Trust Fund to reimburse the Developer in accordance with the Agreement. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Reimbursement Agreement Westpoint Crossing Blk 1, Lots 1 & Ordinance- Reimbursement Agreement Westpoint Crossing Blk 1, Lots 1 &2-P Agreement-WW Reimb Westpoint Crossing Blk 1, Lots 1 &2-Peterson Propert Form 1295 Presentation- Reimbursement Agreement Westpoint Crossing Blk 1, Lots 1 &2 L. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (ITEMS 20 -21) PUBLIC NOTICE is given that the City Council may elect to go into executive session at any time during the meeting in order to discuss any matters listed on the agenda, when authorized by the provisions of the Open Meeting Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, and that the City Council specifically expects to go into executive session on the following matters. If the Council elects to go into executive session regarding an agenda item, the section or sections of the Open Meetings Act authorizing the executive session will be publicly announced by the presiding officer. The City Council may deliberate and take action in open session on any issue that may be discussed in executive session. The description of an item in "Executive Sessions" constitutes the written interpretation by the City Attorney of Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code and his determination that said item may be legally discussed in Closed Meeting in compliance with Chapter 551 the Texas Government Code. 20. 16-0566 Executive session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 for consultation with attorneys regarding collective bargaining matters, (including litigation) between the City of Corpus Christi and the Corpus Christi Firefighters Association. 21. 16-0574 Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and § 551.074, and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct rule 1.05, for consultation with attorneys and to discuss the employment and duties of Firefighter Marco Vasquez (Texas Local Government Code § 143.073-Line of Duty Leave). Corpus Christi Page 9 Printed on 5/23/2016 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final May 24,2016 M. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (ITEM 22) 22. 16-0471 Public Hearing and First Reading Ordinance -Alley closure located between Fifteenth Street and Sixteenth Street and from Buford Avenue to Hancock Avenue Ordinance abandoning and vacating an undeveloped and unsurfaced 5,655-square foot (0.130 acres) portion of a 15-foot wide public right-of-way, as shown and dedicated by Plat of Bay View No. 3, Block 6, a map of which is recorded in Volume A, Page 25, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, and requiring the owners, Corpus Christi Independent School District, and The Salvation Army, a Georgia Corporation to comply with the specified conditions. Attachments: Agenda Memo-Alley Closure Ordinance -Alley Closure ALL Location Maps-Alley Closure N. REGULAR AGENDA: (ITEMS 23 - 26) The following items are motions, resolutions and ordinances that will be considered and voted on individually. 23. 16-0577 Resolution appointing Interim City Manager Resolution to appoint Interim City Manager effective June 24, 2016 until the appointment and qualification of the new City Manager and authorizing the Mayor to set interim compensation. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Interim City Manager Resolution -Interim City Manager 24. 16-0578 Discussion and possible action of process for City Manager selection. Attachments: Agenda Memo- process of selection of City Manager Attachment-Task List for Process for Hiring the City Manager 25. 16-0246 Two Construction Contracts and a Construction Phase and Observation Services Contract for the Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Minor Street Improvement Project Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Ortiz Construction and Paving, Inc. for Part 1 in an amount of$1,813,485.00 and to execute a construction contract with Grace Paving & Construction, Inc. for Part 2 in the amount of $1,831,369.84 for the Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Minor Street Improvements project; and to execute a Construction Phase and Observation Services contract with Engineering & Construction Management Services, LLC of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of Corpus Christi Page 10 Printed on 5/23/2016 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final May 24,2016 $176,880 for the Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Minor Street Improvements project. These are multi-year contracts with a 1-year base plus two 1-year extensions. Attachments: Agenda Memo- IDIQ Minor Street Impr Project Budget- IDIQ MINOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS Presentation - IDIQ Minor Street Improvements Location Map- IDIQ Minor Street Improvements Contract-Construction Management Services Form 1295 Felix Ocanas Form 1295 A Ortiz Construction Form 1295 Grace Paving 26. 16-0462 Second Reading Ordinance -Appropriating funds to execute the Engineering Construction Contract for International Boulevard Improvements (BOND 2012 Proposition 8) (1st Reading 5/10/16) (Tabled 5/17/16) Ordinance appropriating and approving a transfer in the amount of $236,810 from the Unreserved Fund Balance in No. 4612 Airport Operating Reserves Fund to and appropriating in Fund 3018 Airport Capital Reserve Fund; changing the FY 2016 Operating Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030620 to increase expenditures by $236,810; changing the FY 2016 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030621 to increase revenues and expenditures by $236,810 each; and authorizing the City Manager or designee, to execute a Construction contract with Bay, Ltd. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$1,683,694.35 for the International Boulevard Improvements project for the Base Bid and Additive Alternate No. 1. (BOND 2012 Proposition 8) Attachments: Agenda Memo- International Blvd BOND 2012 Ordinance - International Blvd Project Budget- International Blvd Location Map- International Boulevard Improvements Bond 2012 Vicinity Map Presentation - International Blvd BOND 2012 Form 1295 Bay O. FIRST READING ORDINANCES: (NONE) P. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: (ITEMS 27 - 30) The following items are for Council's informational purposes only. No action will be taken and no public comment will be solicited. 27. 16-0560 Resolution approving extension of Temporary Staffing Services Agreements Corpus Christi Page 11 Printed on 5/23/2016 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final May 24,2016 Resolution ratifying one year contract extensions effective as of May 15, 2016, and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute one year extensions to the service agreements with Unique Employment Services, Advance'd Temporaries, Inc., JAT Partners, LLC dba Remedy Intelligent Staffing, and Express Employment Professionals to continue the provision of temporary staffing services for a total expenditure not to exceed $9,057,000 of which approximately $3,773,750 is required for the remainder of the fiscal year. Attachments: Agenda Memo-Temporary Staffing Services.docx Resolution -Temporary Staffing Services.docx Presentation -Temporary Staffing Services SA12-061 Extension III -Temporary Staffing Services Unique Form 1295-Signed SA12-063 Extension III -Temporary Staffing Services Advance'd Form 1295-Signed SA12-064 Extension III -Temporary Staffing Services Remedy Staffing Form 1295-Signed SA12-065 Extension III -Temporary Staffing Services Express Form 1295-Signed 28. 16-0476 Engineering Design Services Contract for North Padre Island Beach Access Roads 3A and 2 (Bond 2014, Proposition 2) Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a contract for engineering design services with Govind Development, LLC. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$73,935.00 for the North Padre Island Beach Access Roads 3A & 2. BOND 2014 Proposition 2. Attachments: Agenda Memo- North Padre Island Beach Access Roads 2 and 3 A Project Budget- North Padre Island Location Map- North Beach Access Roads 3A and 2 Bond 2014 Prop Contract- North Padre Island Beach Access Roads Form 1295-North Padre Island Access Roads Presentation - N Padre Beach Access Roads 2 3a Bond 2014 Prop 2 29. 16-0521 Approving the purchase of a water truck for Parks and Recreation beach services Motion approving the purchase of a 4,000 gallon water truck from Rush Truck Centers of Texas, L.P. of Houston, Texas, for a total cost of $125,406.00. The award is based on the cooperative purchasing agreement with the Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC). Funding is available in the General Fund FY 2015-2016. Corpus Christi Page 12 Printed on 5/23/2016 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final May 24,2016 Attachments: Agenda Memo-4.000 Gallon Water Truck.docx Price Sheet-4,000 Gallon Water Truck.xlsx 12940-Org - budget COF 30. 16-0486 Resolution approving the purchase of water testing reagents for the Water Utilities Department and Health Department Resolution finding that competitive bids are not required for a procurement from IDEXX Distribution, Inc., Westbrook, Maine, for the laboratory testing reagent Colilert, and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to enter into a supply agreement for a not to exceed amount of$135,304.00, of which $45,101.33 is required for the remainder of FY 2015-2016. Funds have been budgeted by the Water Department and Health Department in FY 2015-2016. The term of the agreement shall be for one year with an option to extend for up to two additional one year terms, subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or designee. Attachments: Agenda Memo-Colilert.docx Resolution -Colilert.docx Price Sheet-Colilert.xlsx SupplyAgreement-Colilert.pdf Form 1295-Colilert.pdf Q. BRIEFINGS: (ITEM 31) Briefing information will be provided to the City Council during the Council meeting. Briefings are for Council information only. Council may give direction to the City Manager, but no other action will be taken and no public comment will be solicited. 31. 16-0535 Wastewater Management Plan Attachments: Agenda Memo-Wastewater Management Plan Presentation -Wastewater Management Plan R. ADJOURNMENT Corpus Christi Page 13 Printed on 5/23/2016 Cornus Christi 1201 Leopard Street F' Corpus Christi,TX 78401 y cctexas.com Meeting Minutes City Council Tuesday, May 17,2016 11:30 AM Council Chambers Public Notice - - THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE PROHIBITED IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. A. Mayor Nelda Martinez to call the meeting to order. Mayor Martinez called the meeting to order. B. Invocation to be given by Priest Lakshmi Srinivasacharyulu Anikepalli, Sri Venkateswara Temple. Priest Lakshmi Srinivasacharyulu Anikepalli gave the invocation. C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States to be led by Belinda Mercado, Director of Information Systems. Director of Information Services Belinda Mercado led the Pledge of Allegiance. D. City Secretary Rebecca Huerta to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. City Secretary Rebecca Huerta called the roll and verified that a quorum of the City Council and the required Charter Officers were present to conduct the meeting. Charter Officers: Deputy City Manager Margie C. Rose, City Attorney Miles K. Risley, and City Secretary Rebecca Huerta. Present: 9- Mayor Nelda Marti nez,Council Member Rudy Garza,Council Member Michael Hunter,Council Member Chad Magill,Council Member Colleen Mclntyre,Council Member Lucy Rubio,Council Member Brian Rosas,Council Member Mark Scott, and Council Member Carolyn Vaughn E. Proclamations /Commendations 1. Proclamation declaring May 21, 2016, "Kids to Parks Day". Proclamation declaring May 15-21, 2016, "National Public Works Week". Proclamation declaring May 2016, "Elder Abuse Prevention Month". Proclamation declaring May 2016, "International Internal Audit Awareness Month". Corpus Christi Page 1 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 Proclamation declaring May 2016, "Older Americans Month". Commendation to Corpus Christi Senior Table Tennis Group. Mayor Martinez presented the proclamations and a certificate of commendation. G. CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS / UPDATE ON CITY OPERATIONS: Mayor Martinez announced that earlier today, City Manager Ron Olson submitted his letter of resignation. Mayor Martinez quoted City Manager Olson: "Ultimately I am responsible for the organization and with that I'm holding myself accountable for the recent water boil. Even though the water boil is a catalyst event,this is something I have been thinking about for a long time and I feel like now is the right time." Mayor Martinez referred to City Manager Olson's comments stating that he feels like he's leaving the organization in better shape than when he arrived and is grateful for the fine people he has worked alongside with and the Mayor and Council, both previous and present, for their support. Mayor Martinez stated that City Manager Olson has been with the City of Corpus Christi for 5 years and his resignation will be effective upon completion of the usage of his accrued leave.An interim City Manager has not been announced at this time. Mayor Martinez referred to City Manager's Comments. Deputy City Manager Margie Rose reminded the City Council that a Customer Service Representative was present at the back entrance to the Council Chambers and will be available for customer assistance from 11:00 a.m. until the end of public comment. a. OTHER Assistant City Manager Mark Van Vleck provided an update on the recent water boil notice. Assistant City Manager Van Vleck presented the following information: an overview of the water distribution system; an explanation of the City's water pressure zones; a map reflecting the locations of the 98 water quality monitoring sites; water quality reporting on the City's website;the chlorine levels that resulted in the water boil; bacteria,the sample testing positive for bacteria, not E. coli;the three sites prompting the water boil notice including:the Quetzal, Glenmore, and Harbor Lights areas; monitoring and action; and the age of the system. Assistant City Manager Van Vleck stated that the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality requires a water boil notice for the entire City when a chlorine residual testing sample is below 0.5. Assistant City Manager Van Vleck showed the City Council an example of a tuberculated pipe that is a contributing factor to the low chlorine levels and discussed the short-and long-term solutions to improve the system. Corpus Christi Page 2 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 F. PUBLIC COMMENT FROM THE AUDIENCE ON MATTERS NOT SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA WILL BE HEARD AT APPROXIMATELY 12:00 P.M. PLEASE LIMIT PRESENTATIONS TO THREE MINUTES. A recording is made of the meeting; therefore, please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. If you choose to speak during this public comment period regarding an item on the agenda, you may do so. You will not be allowed to speak again, however, when the Council is considering the item. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Mayor Martinez referred to comments from the public.Abel Alonzo, 1701 Thames,spoke regarding the water boil situation and said it is unfair to blame City Manager Olson or staff for actions not taken by the City Council in the past. Malcolm DeShields, 6834 Dorsey; Paul Hatridge, 6026 Lost Creek; and Scott Turner,422 Colony,spoke regarding SAVOR,the provider of food and beverage services at the American Bank Center, and their recent submission of an application to the Texas Alcohol and Beverage Commission (TABC)which would monopolize alcohol services at the American Bank Center and have negative impact to economy. Juliane Brown, 1241 Calle San Marcos,spoke regarding the recent overflow at La Voila Creek and requested help to improve the storm water system and clean La Voila Creek. Tina Butler, 1450 Cambridge, encouraged the City Council and public to attend the 2nd Annual Mandela Day Celebration on Saturday, July 16, 2016 at Heritage Park from 4:00 p.m.to 10:00 p.m. Rey Madrigal,4253 Dody, expressed concern regarding the water boil situation and the safety of the community.Joan Veith, 5701 Cain, spoke regarding the water boil situation and the expense citizens are incurring for bottled water. Tyrone Jackson,4322 Kostoryz, provided suggestions for monitoring closed valves in the water system and spoke regarding the businesses throughout the community that are monopolizing services at various venues. Dan Stiefel, 6773 Wood Iron Drive,spoke regarding the timeline for addressing changes to the taxi cab ordinance. H. MINUTES: 2. Regular Meeting of May 10, 2016 Mayor Martinez referred to approval of the minutes. Council Member Garza made a motion to approve the minutes,seconded by Council Member Rosas and passed unanimously. I. BOARD &COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: (NONE) J. EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION: K. CONSENT AGENDA: (ITEMS 3 - 16) Approval of the Consent Agenda Mayor Martinez referred to the Consent Agenda. There were no comments from the Council or the public. City Secretary Huerta announced that Council Member Scott was abstaining from the vote on Item 12. Corpus Christi Page 3 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 A motion was made by Council Member Magill, seconded by Council Member McIntyre,to approve the Consent Agenda. The consent agenda items were approved by one vote as follows: Aye: 9- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Rosas, Council Member Scott and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 3. Resolution nominating CITGO as a Texas Enterprise Project Resolution nominating CITGO Refining & Chemical Co. L.P. ("CITGO") to the Office of the Governor Economic Development & Tourism ("EDT") through the Economic Development Bank ("Bank") as a single enterprise project pursuant to the Texas Enterprise Zone Act ("Act"). This Resolution was passed on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 030840 4. Resolution approving a Developer Participation Agreement to reimburse developer for the City's cost to extend Homedale Drive located south of Purdue, east of Flour Bluff Drive, west of Waldron Road and north of Glenoak Drive. Resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a developer participation agreement with Esteban R. Alaniz, ("Developer"), to reimburse the Developer up to $38,614.71 for the City's share of the cost to extend Homedale Drive, in accordance with the Unified Development Code. This Resolution was passed on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 030841 5. Second Reading Ordinance -Appropriating funds to reimburse developer for the shared cost to construct Homedale Drive located south of Purdue, east of Flour Bluff Drive, west of Waldron Road and north of Glenoak Drive (1st Reading 5/10/16) Ordinance appropriating $180.48 of interest earned and approving use of$3,379.80 of interest earnings and $27,703.31 of developer deposits in the No. 4730 Infrastructure Fund to reimburse Esteban R. Alaniz for 'h street construction cost of constructing Homedale Drive. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 030842 Corpus Christi Page 4 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 6. Second Reading Ordinance - Rezoning property located at 7442 Wooldridge Road (1st Reading 5/10/16 Case No. 0316-02 Alex Azali: A change of zoning from the "RM-1" Multifamily 1 District to the "RM-2" Multifamily 2 District. The property is described as being a 13.814 acre tract of land out of a portion of Lots 13 and 14, Section 27, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, located along the north side of Wooldridge Road between Bevo Drive and Gold Star Drive. Planning Commission Recommendation (April 6, 2016): Denial of the change of zoning from the "RM-1" Multifamily 1 District to the "RM-2" Multifamily 2 District and, in lieu thereof, approval of the change of zoning to the "RM-1/SP" Multifamily 1 District with a Special Permit, subject to eight conditions and modifying condition #4. Staff Recommendation: Denial of the change of zoning from the "RM-1" Multifamily 1 District to the "RM-2" Multifamily 2 District and, in lieu thereof, approval of the change of zoning to the "RM-1/SP" Multifamily 1 District with a Special Permit, subject to eight conditions. Ordinance as Recommended by Staff: Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC'), upon application by Alex Azali on behalf of Dorsal Development, LLC ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to a 13.814 acre tract of land out of a portion of Lots 13 and 14, Section 27, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, from the "RM-1" Multifamily 1 District to the "RM-1/SP" Multifamily 1 District with a Special Permit; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 030843 7. Second Reading Ordinance - Rezoning property located at 1752 Rand Morgan Road (1st Reading 5/10/16) Case No. 0316-04 NP Homes, LLC: A change of zoning from the "FR" Farm Rural District and "IH" Heavy Industrial District to the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District and to the "FR" Farm Rural District. The property is described as being a 28.228 acre tract of land described by Deed Document No. 200401783, Official Records of Nueces County, Texas, containing two tracts of land: Tract 1, being 21.568 acres out of a 25.998 acre tract of land; and Tract 2 being a 6.660 acre tract out of an 85.022 acre tract of land, located on the east side of Rand Morgan Corpus Christi Page 5 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 Road between McNorton Street and Goodnight Loving Trail. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (April 6, 2016): Approval of the change of zoning from the "FR" Farm Rural and "I H" Heavy Industrial Districts to the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District on Tract 1 and "FR" Farm Rural District on Tract 2. Ordinance Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC'), upon application by NP Homes, LLC on behalf of Double T & C Properties, Inc. ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to a 28.228 acre tract of land described by Deed Document No. 200401783, Official Records of Nueces County, Texas, containing two tracts of land: Tract 1, being 21.568 acres out of a 25.998 acre tract of land; and Tract 2 being a 6.660 acre tract out of an 85.022 acre tract of land, from the "FR" Farm Rural District and "IH" Heavy Industrial District to the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District and to the "FR" Farm Rural District, amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 030844 8. Second Reading Ordinance - Rezoning property located at 4315 Carroll Lane (1st Reading 5/10/16) Case No. 0316-05 TG 110 Samuel Place, LP: A change of zoning from the "RS-TF/SP" Two-Family District with a Special Permit to the "RM-1" Multifamily 1 District. The property is described as Carrollton Annex 3, Block C, located on the west side of Carroll Lane between Copus Street and Houston Street. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (April 6, 2016): Approval of the change of zoning from the "RS-TF/SP" Two-Family District with a Special Permit to the "RM-1" Multifamily 1 District. Ordinance Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC'), upon application by TG 110 Samuel Place, LP on behalf of HCS 310 LLC ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to Carrollton Annex 3, Block C, from the "RS-TF/SP" Two-Family District with a Special Permit to the "RM-1" Multifamily 1 District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 030845 Corpus Christi Page 6 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 9. Second Reading Ordinance -Amending the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan for Service Area 5 of the Greenwood Wastewater Master Plan (1st Reading 5/10/16) Ordinance amending the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan Greenwood Wastewater Master Plan Service Area, Area 5, an element of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, by adding two lift stations, adjusting lift station basin boundaries, and realigning the proposed wastewater collection lines; amending related elements of the Comprehensive Plan of the City; providing for severance; and providing for publication. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 030846 10. Second Reading Ordinance - Revisions to Chapter 14, Article II, Technical Construction Codes (1st Reading 5/10/16) Ordinance repealing and reenacting The Code of Ordinances, City of Corpus Christi Chapter 14, Article II, City of Corpus Christi Technical Construction Codes Divisions 1-8: Division 1, "Scope and Administration of Technical Construction Codes," Sections 14-201 thru 14-207. Division 2, "Building Code and Existing Building Code," Sections 14-231 thru 14-232. Division 3, "Electrical Code," Section 14-241. Division 4, "Energy Conservation Code," Section 14-251. Division 5, "Fuel Gas Code," Section 14-261. Division 6, "Mechanical Code," Section 14-271. Division 7, "Plumbing Code," Section 14-281. Division 8, "Residential Code," Section 14-291 This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 030847 11. Second Reading Ordinance -Accepting and appropriating grant funds for Emergency Medical Service (EMS) operation (1 st Reading 5/10/16) Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to accept a grant from the Coastal Bend Regional Advisory Council in the amount of $2,951.62; and appropriating $2,951.62 from the Coastal Bend Regional Advisory Council into the No. 1056 Ambulance Grant Fund to purchase supplies to support the delivery of emergency medical services for the Corpus Christi Fire Department. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 030848 12. Second Reading Ordinance -Approving the sale of parkland (1st Reading 5/10/16) Corpus Christi Page 7 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 Ordinance approving the sale of properties as follows and authorizing the City Manager to execute documents necessary to complete each real estate sales transaction: a) Fountain Park (4938 Moody) to Seaside Builders, LLC in amount of $70,000; b) Mt. Vernon Park (5151 McArdle) to Corpus Christi Retail Venture and Corpus Christi Area Council for the Deaf in amount of $1,763,801.90. This Ordinance was passed on second reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 8- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Rosas and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 1 - Council Member Scott Enactment No: 030849 13. Second Reading Ordinance -Accepting and appropriating funds from a Federal grant for Tuberculosis prevention and control services (1st Reading 5/10/16) Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept, amend and appropriate a grant contract for the Tuberculosis Prevention and Control-Federal (TB/PC-FED) grant in the amount of$48,345, from the Texas Department of State Health Services in the No. 1066 Health Grants Fund with a City match of$9,669, from the No. 1020 General Fund, to provide tuberculosis prevention and control services for the contract period January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016 for a total project cost of$58,104; and ratifying acceptance of the grant agreement to begin January 1, 2016. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 030850 14. Second Reading Ordinance -Approving an Interlocal Agreement with RTA and execute an Engineering Design Contract for Ayers Street Pedestrian Improvements and Turn Lane Addition (BOND 2014) (1st Reading 5/10/16) Ordinance appropriating $80,000 of anticipated revenues from the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA); changing the FY 2016 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030621 to increase revenues and expenditures by $80,000; Authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an Interlocal Agreement with the RTA; authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an Corpus Christi Page 8 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 engineering design contract with Lockwood, Andrews and Newnam, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$513,625.00 for the Ayers Street Pedestrian Improvements and Turn Lane Addition from S.P.I.D to Gollihar project (Bond 2014 Proposition 2). This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 030851 15. Second Reading Ordinance - Prohibiting parking on portions of Mestina Street and Artesian Street and changing from two-way traffic to one-way (1st Reading 5/10/16) Ordinance amending the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 53, Section 53-250 Schedule I - One Way Streets and Alleys by changing designated portions of Artesian Street and Mestina Street from a two-way traffic pattern to a one-way traffic pattern and Schedule III - Parking prohibited at all times on certain streets by adding designated portions Artesian Street and Mestina Street. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 030852 16. Second Reading Ordinance - Interlocal Agreement with RTA and Change Order No. 2 with Bay LTD, for repairs to streets damaged by RTA temporary bus detours (1st Reading 5/10/16) Ordinance appropriating $300,000 of anticipated revenues from the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA); changing the FY 2016 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030621 to increase revenues and expenditures by $300,000; authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an Interlocal Agreement with the RTA; authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a change order with Bay, Ltd. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $358,683.57 for the South Staples Street from Morgan Avenue to IH 37 project. Bond 2012, Proposition 1. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 030853 O. REGULAR AGENDA: (ITEM 26) 26. Second Reading Ordinance -Accepting and appropriating funds for the maintenance of Mirador Outlooks (1 st Reading 5/10/16) Ordinance accepting $13,000 from the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation's No. 1120 Seawall Improvement Fund Corpus Christi Page 9 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 as a match to the City of Corpus Christi's $13,000 appropriation for maintenance of the Miradores in the No. 1020 General Fund; appropriating $13,000 from the unreserved fund balance in the No. 1120 Seawall Improvement Fund; and amending the FY2015-2016 operating budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030620 to increase revenue and expenditures in the No. 1020 General Fund by $13,000 each; and expenditures in the No. 1120 Seawall Improvement Fund by $13,000. Mayor Martinez deviated from the agenda and referred to item 26, maintenance of the Mirador Outlooks. There were no comments from the Council or the public. Council Member McIntyre made a motion to approve the minutes, seconded by Council Member Magill. This Ordinance was passed on second reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 7- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio and Council Member Rosas Absent: 2- Council Member Scott and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 Enactment No: 030855 L. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (ITEMS 17 - 18) Mayor Martinez deviated from the agenda and referred to the day's executive sessions. The Council went into executive session. 17. Executive session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 for consultation with attorneys regarding collective bargaining matters and/or the collective bargaining agreements between the City of Corpus Christi and the Corpus Christi Firefighters Association. Mayor Martinez referred to Item 17 and the following motion was considered: Motion re-affirming Resolution No. 030808 containing the City's Last, Best and Final Offer in the 2015 Collective Bargaining Negotiation process between the City of Corpus Christi and the Corpus Christi Professional Firefighters' Association—Local Union 936. Mayor Martinez made a motion to approve the motion,seconded by Council Member McIntyre. This Motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Rosas, Council Member Scott and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 Enactment No: M2016-050 Corpus Christi Page 10 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 18. Executive Session pursuant to Section 551.071 of the Texas Government Code and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to the New Broadway Waste Water Treatment Plant and other parts of the City's Sanitary Sewer Collection System This E-Session Item was discussed in executive session. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (ITEMS 22 -24) 22. Public Hearing and First Reading Ordinance - Rezoning property located at 1802 - 1820 Buford Street Case No. 0416-02 The Salvation Army: A change of zoning from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District to the "CG-1/SP" General Commercial District with a Special Permit for a social service use. The property is described as being a 2.42 acre tract of land, being all of Lots 1-16, Block 6 and a 15 foot wide alley, Bay View No. 3, located between Hancock Avenue and Buford Avenue and between 16th Street and 15th Street. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (April 20, 2016): Denial of the change of zoning from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District to the "CG-1/SP" General Commercial District with a Special Permit and, in lieu thereof, approval of the "RS-6/SP" Single-Family 6 District with a Special Permit subject to nine conditions. Ordinance: Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), upon application by The Salvation Army ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to a 2.42 acre tract of land, being all of Lots 1-16, Block 6 and a 15 foot wide alley, Bay View No. 3, from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District to the "RS-6/SP" Single-Family 6 District with a Special Permit for a social service use; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. Mayor Martinez deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 22. Interim Director of Development Services Daniel McGinn stated that the purpose of this item is to rezone the subject property to allow a transitional housing facility for de-located families and veterans. Mr. McGinn stated that the Planning Commission and staff recommend denial of the "CG-1/SP"General Commercial District with a Special Permit and, in lieu thereof, approval of the "RS-6/SP" Single-Family 6 District with a Special Permit subject to nine conditions. Mr. McGinn provided an overview of the site plan and Special Permit conditions. Mayor Martinez opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the public. Mayor Martinez closed the public hearing. Corpus Christi Page 11 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 Council members spoke regarding the following topics:the Salvation Army relocating from Leopard Street to Buford Street; the opposition received;the special permit restrictions; and location of the front of the facility. Mayor Martinez requested that the record reflect that Lupe Spaller had been present at the meeting to express her concerns on the rezoning and had to leave. Council Member Scott made a motion to approve the ordinance,seconded by Council Member McIntyre. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Rosas, Council Member Scott and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 24. Public Hearing and First Reading Ordinance - Rezoning property located at 14102 Ambrosia Street Case No. 0316-06 Yun W. Hwang: A change of zoning from the "RM-3" Multifamily 3 District to the "RS-TH/PUD" Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Development Overlay. The property is described as Lot 1-B, Block 1, Padre Island No. 1, together with that portion of Estrada Drive (now closed), adjacent to said Lot 1-B, Block 1, Padre Island No. 1, located on the north side of Ambrosia Street between Scallop Street and Indigo Street. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (April 20, 2016): Approval of the change of zoning from "RM-3" Multifamily 3 District to the "RS-TH/PUD" Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Development Overlay subject to nine conditions. Ordinance: Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC'), upon application by Yun W. Hwang ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to Lot 1-B, Block 1, Padre Island No. 1, together with that portion of Estrada Drive (now closed), adjacent to said Lot 1-B, Block 1, Padre Island No. 1, from the "RM-3" Multifamily 3 District to the "RS-TH/PUD" Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Development Overlay; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. Mayor Martinez deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 24. Interim Director of Development Services Daniel McGinn stated that the purpose of this item is to rezone the subject property to allow construction of a 4-unit townhome project. Mr. McGinn stated that the Planning Commission and staff are in favor of the zoning change to the "RS-TH/PUD"Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Development subject to nine conditions. Mr. McGinn provided a Corpus Christi Page 12 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 brief overview of the conditions. Mayor Martinez opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the public. Mayor Martinez closed the public hearing. Council members spoke regarding the following topics: clarification on the opposition; the deviations on the allowances between the current"RM-3"and the proposed"RS-THIPUD";the number of units allowed in the"RM-3";the number of acres on this site; and the decrease in density with the zoning change. Mr. McGinn stated that opposition exceeds 20% and requires three-fourths vote of the City Council to approve. Council Member McIntyre made a motion to approve the ordinance,seconded by Council Member Garza. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Rosas, Council Member Scott and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 23. Public Hearing and First Reading Ordinance - Rezoning property located at 22 - 26 and 34 -37 N. Country Club Drive, and 39, 41, 42, and 56 Country Club Drive Case No. 0416-03 Magellan Terminals Holdings, LP: A change of zoning from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District, "ON" Office District and "RM-1" Multifamily 1 District to the "IL" Light Industrial District. The property is described as Lots 22-26, 34-42 and 55-56, Country Club Place, located on the north side of Interstate Highway 37, between Up River Road and Poth Lane. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (April 20, 2016): Approval of the change of zoning from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District, "ON" Office District and "RM-1" Multifamily 1 District to the "IL" Light Industrial District. Ordinance: Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC'), upon application by Magellan Terminals Holdings, LP ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to Lots 22-26, 34-42 and 55-56, Country Club Place, from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District, "ON" Office District and "RM-1" Multifamily 1 District to the "IL" Light Industrial District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. Mayor Martinez deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 23. Interim Director of Development Services Dan McGinn stated that the purpose of this Corpus Christi Page 13 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 item is to rezone the subject property to allow light industrial uses. Mr. McGinn stated that the Planning Commission and staff are in favor of the zoning change. Mayor Martinez opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the Council or the public. Mayor Martinez closed the public hearing. Council Member Garza made a motion to approve the ordinance,seconded by Council Member Magill. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Rosas, Council Member Scott and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 M. SPECIAL ITEMS: PRESENTATION REGARDING TAXI ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION REGARDING TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY(TNC) INITIATIVE ORDINANCE: (ITEMS 19 -20) 20. Discussion and possible action regarding a resolution to waive the charter requirement granting 45 days for Council consideration of an initiative ordinance Discussion and possible action regarding a resolution to waive the time allotted under City Charter Article I, Section 4 for Council consideration of adoption of an initiative ordinance and authorizing the City Secretary to furnish the proponents petition pages upon passage of this resolution. Mayor Martinez deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 20. City Secretary Rebecca Huerta stated that the purpose of this item is discussion and possible action regarding a resolution to waive the City Charter requirement for 45 days of City Council consideration of an initiative ordinance. During the May 10,2016 City Council meeting discussion on the initiative ordinance for establishing transportation network companies,the question was raised if the Council could waive the charter provision requiring the 45-day consideration period to allow for distribution of the petition pages as soon as possible. After reviewing case law, the City Attorney has determined that the City Council may waive a Charter provision when it is determined to be a provision solely for their convenience. Thus,staff is presenting the proposed resolution with findings to formally waive the requirements. City Secretary Huerta stated that she was asked whether City Council has waived the charter provision in the past and research determined that this action has not happened before. Council members spoke regarding the following topics: reasons for supporting the waiver; the City Council never before having taken action to waive the charter provision;when the proponents will receive the petition pages and can begin gathering signatures;the provisions in the City Charter related to the substance of the initiative measure to be considered by the voters and required information from the voters signing the petition; and staffing needed Corpus Christi Page 14 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 to validate the petition. Council Member McIntyre made a motion to approve the resolution,seconded by Council Member Magill. This Resolution was passed and approved with the following vote: Aye: 8- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Rosas and Council Member Scott Absent: 1 - Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 Enactment No: 030854 19. Discussion / Direction -Vehicle for Hire /Taxi Ordinance Mayor Martinez deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 19. Interim Assistant City Manager Jay Ellington stated that the purpose of this item is to discuss and receive direction on the Vehicle for Hire/Taxi Ordinance. Interim Assistant City Manager Ellington presented the following information: the timeline for the discussion process;the current vehicle-for-hire ordinance Chapter 57 and Chapter 9 as it relates to the Airport; responses from the Taxi Focus Groups and questionnaires; and a chart to receive direction on the ordinance as it relates to the vehicle-for-hire's company, driver,vehicle, and the Airport. There was a general concurrence of the City Council on the following direction: Certificate of Operation -Annual; Certificate of Operation Fee -2% Gross Receipts; Street User Fee- n/a; Minimum#of Vehicles -n/a; Local Office -No,same as transportation network company(TNC)ordinance ; Trade Signage or Emblem -yes, but color scheme not required; City Access to Records -Yes; Driver Permit required -vehicle-for-hire driver's permit required and valid for 2 years; Driver Permit Fee-$50 for 2 years; Limit on Operating Hours of Driver-Driver limited to 12 hours in 24-hour time span; Physical/Medical -removal of the medical testing, no defensive driving for both the TNC and vehicle-for-hire ordinance; Background Check for Drivers -Yes; Fingerprinting-Yes; Licensing Fee-n/a;Vehicle Inspection -State Inspection only; Fire Extinguishers - removal from both the TNC and vehicle-for-hire ordinance; Age of Vehicle -10 years (7 years with 3-year extension); Insurance -same as TNC; Fees -n/a; Modifications -removal of overhead light requirement; and review of the airport regulations by the Airport Board. Council members spoke regarding the following topics:the financial impacts related to the direction for the vehicle-for-hire ordinance; removal of the overhead light requirement;whether medical testing includes vision testing; renewal of drivers license requirements;vehicle inspection requirements; whether vehicle inspections include checking for bald tires;the legality of increasing fines for expired inspections;the need for fire extinguishers;fare rate disclosures and a review of other cities' regulations; painting of vehicles; and the use of specialty vehicles. Dan Stiefel and Dillon Stiefel with Green-N-Go Cab Company provided feedback and responded to council members'questions regarding taxi cab operations. Corpus Christi Page 15 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 MOTION OF DIRECTION Council Member Rubio made a motion directing the Deputy City Manager to keep the fire extinguisher requirement consistent with the current TNC ordinance requiring fire extinguishers, seconded by Council Member Rosas. The motion failed with the following vote: Martinez, Garza, Rosas, and Rubio, voting "Aye"; Hunter, Magill, McIntyre, Scott, and Vaughn,voting "No". MOTION OF DIRECTION Council Member McIntyre made a motion directing the Deputy City Manager to remove the fire extinguisher requirement from the TNC and vehicle-for-hire ordinance, seconded by Council Member Magill. The motion passed with the following vote: Hunter, Magill, McIntyre, Scott, and Vaughn,voting"Aye"; Martinez, Garza, Rosas, and Rubio,voting "No". MOTION OF DIRECTION Council Member McIntyre made a motion directing the Deputy City Manager to work toward requiring the Taxi Inspector's Office to accept credit cards for all fees,seconded by Council Member Magill and passed unanimously. MOTION OF DIRECTION Council Member McIntyre made a motion directing the Deputy City Manager to remove outdated ordinance language regarding the requirement for a Geographic Test,2-Way Radios, and phone dispatch;seconded by Council Member Magill and passed unanimously. MOTION OF DIRECTION Council Member McIntyre made a motion directing the Deputy City Manager to come back with a recommendation, including certain flat-rate areas, but to also allow the taxis the option of metering on those specific trips and to re-evaluate the rate mechanism in the current ordinance,seconded by Council Member Magill and passed unanimously. MOTION OF DIRECTION Mayor Martinez made a motion directing the Deputy City Manager to incorporate into a revised ordinance,the city council's items of general concurrence and those set out in the motions of direction,for consideration at the June 14,2016 Council meeting,seconded by Council Member McIntyre and passed unanimously. N. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (ITEM 21) 21. Public Hearing First Reading Ordinance - Proposed Amendment to MobilityCC by adopting the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization Strategic Plan for Active Mobility, Phase 1: Bicycle Mobility Plan Ordinance amending MobilityCC, a transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Corpus Christi, by adopting the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) Strategic Plan for Active Mobility, Phase 1: Bicycle Mobility Plan; providing for Corpus Christi Page 16 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 severance; providing for a repealer clause; and providing for publication. Mayor Martinez deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 21. Interim Director of Development Services Daniel McGinn stated that the purpose of this item is to adopt the Strategic Plan for Active Mobility, Phase 1: Bicycle Mobility Plan into the City's MobilityCC. Mr. McGinn provided information on the plan objectives and timeline. The Transportation Advisory Commission, Park and Recreation Advisory Committee, Planning Commission, and staff recommend approval of the amendment excluding the best practice matrix. Jeff Pollack, Director of the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), stated that the Bicycle Mobility Network is 290 miles of a strategic network of various types of bicycle infrastructure intended to uphold a very high level of safety and services across the entire network. Council members spoke regarding the following topics: cost savings and how the plan was received by the Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority (RTA). Mayor Martinez opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the public. Mayor Martinez closed the public hearing. Mayor Martinez made a motion to approve the ordinance,seconded by Council Member McIntyre. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 7- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rosas and Council Member Scott Absent: 2- Council Member Rubio and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 O. REGULAR AGENDA: (ITEM 25) 25. Second Reading Ordinance -Appropriating funds to execute the Engineering Construction Contract for International Boulevard Improvements (BOND 2012 Proposition 8) (1st Reading 5/10/16) Ordinance appropriating and approving a transfer in the amount of $236,810 from the Unreserved Fund Balance in No. 4612 Airport Operating Reserves Fund to and appropriating in Fund 3018 Airport Capital Reserve Fund; changing the FY 2016 Operating Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030620 to increase expenditures by $236,810; changing the FY 2016 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030621 to increase revenues and expenditures by $236,810 each; and authorizing the City Manager or designee, to execute a Construction contract with Bay, Ltd. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$1,683,694.35 for the International Boulevard Improvements project for the Base Bid and Additive Alternate No. 1. (BOND 2012 Proposition 8) Corpus Christi Page 17 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 Mayor Martinez deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 25. Director of Engineering Services Jeff Edmonds stated that the purpose of this item is to execute a construction contract for the International Boulevard Improvements project(Bond 2012)and authorize to appropriation of funds from the Airport Operating Reserves Fund to fund overhead signs. There were no comments from the public. Council members spoke regarding the following topics:whether the savings from County Road 52 are appropriate for this specific project and why not other Proposition 8 projects; consideration to amend the amount from the Airport Operating Reserves Fund to$511,810 subject to the approval of the Federal Aviation Administration; and the ability to inform the Airport Board of this funding plan. A motion was made by Council Member Chad Magill,seconded by Council Member Colleen McIntyre,that this Ordinance be tabled to the May 24, 2016 city council meeting. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. P. FIRST READING ORDINANCES: (ITEMS 27 -29) 27. First Reading Ordinance -Accepting and appropriating additional Federal grant funds for the Houston High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept additional grant funding in the amount of$9,100.65 from the Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy, to support the Police Departments role in the Texas Coastal Corridor Initiative in the Houston High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA); and appropriating the $9,100.65 in the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund. Mayor Martinez referred to Item 27. Police Chief Mike Markle stated that the purpose of this item is to accept additional Houston High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area(HIDTA)grant funding in the amount of$9,100.65. There were no comments from the Council or the public. Council Member Scott made a motion to approve the ordinance,seconded by Council Member Magill. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Rosas, Council Member Scott and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 28. First Reading Ordinance -Abandoning and vacating an existing blanket pipeline easement, located at the northeast corner of Staples Street and Wooldridge Drive Ordinance abandoning and vacating of an existing blanket easement, Corpus Christi Page 18 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 located at Lokey Subdivision, Block 16D, Lot 5 that was recorded at Nueces County Deed Records Vol. 269 pages 249-250 and located north of Wooldridge Drive, and west of the South Staples Street public street right-of-way; and requiring the owner of the lot, Brimhall Enterprises, Inc., to comply with the specified conditions. Mayor Martinez referred to Item 28.Assistant Director of Development Services Julio Dimas stated that the purpose of this item is to abandon and vacate a blanket pipeline easement located at the corner of Wooldridge Drive and Staples Street. The new owner of the property is requesting the elimination of the pipeline easement that has been in effect since 1954 to provide for redevelopment. The Gas Department has no objection to this request. There were no comments from the public. In response to a council member, Mr. Dimas stated that, in the future, staff will be bringing two additional items abandoning and vacating remaining portions of the existing blanket pipeline easement. Council Member McIntyre made a motion to approve the ordinance,seconded by Council Member Magill. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Rosas, Council Member Scott and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 29. First Reading Ordinance -Approving agreement and appropriating funds for the construction of a sanitary sewer trunk line, force main and lift station located on the southeast corner of South Padre Island Drive and Old Brownsville Road Ordinance authorizing city manager or designee to execute a sanitary sewer trunk line, force main and lift station construction and reimbursement agreement ("Agreement") with Peterson Properties, Ltd., ("Developer"), for the construction of a sanitary sewer trunk line, force main and lift station and appropriating $911,341.24 from the No. 4220 Sanitary Sewer Trunk System Trust Fund to reimburse the Developer in accordance with the Agreement. Mayor Martinez referred to Item 29.Assistant Director of Development Services Julio Dimas stated that the purpose of this item is to execute a sanitary sewer trunk line force main and lift station construction and reimbursement agreement. Based on the amendments made to the Wastewater Master Plan, Item 9 on today's agenda,the developer is proposing to develop Westpoint Crossing subdivision with a trunk line and lift station. The construction includes approximately 7,000 linear feet of 6-inch forced main, 8-inch trunk line and a lift station with a flow of 470 gallons per minute(gmp). Funds are available from the Sanitary Sewer Trunk System Trust Fund. There were no comments from the public. Council members spoke regarding the infrastructure investment bringing Corpus Christi Page 19 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 economic development to District 3. Council Member Rubio made a motion to approve the ordinance,seconded by Council Member Magill. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Rosas, Council Member Scott and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 R. BRIEFINGS: (ITEM 40) 40. Corpus Christi Regional Economic Development Corporation - Quarterly Economic Update Mayor Martinez deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 40. Iain Vasey, President/CEO of the Corpus Christi Regional Economic Development Corporation (EDC),stated that the purpose of this item is to provide the EDC's quarterly update. Mr. Vasey presented the following information: a breakdown of the employment by sector; the EDC's goals and results; the key economic indicators; the economic outlook watch list; indicators for ethane, liquefaction, and pipeline infrastructure;the EDC's strategic plan; business retention and expansion; and the launch of the Qualified Sites Program. Mr.Vasey referred to the renewal of the 1/8 cent sales tax and stated that the EDC Board passed a resolution on April 14,2016 supporting the following positions: 1) Minimum of 50% of the total funds for Economic Development;2) Up to$500,000 to affordable housing programs; 3) Balance of funds to arterial/collector streets; and 4)The EDC supports the continuance of the sales tax for 20 years, maintaining a review/recommendation panel,supports a Type B structure, and appropriate protection mechanisms to ensure funds for economic development are maintained. Q. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: (ITEMS 30 - 39) Mayor Martinez referred to Future Agenda Items. Deputy City Manager Rose stated that staff had planned presentations on Items 37 and 39. Council members requested information on Items 32 and 35. 30. Resolution authorizing 3 Interlocal Agreements with local school districts to provide bus transportation for 2016 summer programs Resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute separate multi-year Interlocal Agreements with the Calallen Independent School District, the Corpus Christi Independent School District and the Flour Bluff Independent School District, to provide transportation services for summer youth recreation programs. This Resolution was recommended to the consent agenda. 31. Resolution authorizing request for beach cleaning and Corpus Christi Page 20 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 maintenance funding from Texas General Land Office for FY 2016-17 Resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to request continued financial assistance for beach cleaning and maintenance on North Padre Island and Mustang Island during FY 2016-2017 under the Texas General Land Office's Beach Cleaning and Maintenance Assistance Program. This Resolution was recommended to the consent agenda. 32. Construction contract for Community Park Development and Improvements - Parker Park (Bond 2012) Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Ram-Bro Construction of Robstown, Texas in the amount of$363,559.50 for the Community Park Development and Improvements - Parker Park project for the base bid only for improvements to the existing park. (Bond 2012, Proposition 4). This Motion was recommended to the consent agenda. 33. Two Construction Contracts and a Construction Phase and Observation Services Contract for the Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Minor Street Improvement Project Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Ortiz Construction and Paving, Inc. for Part 1 in an amount of$1,813,485.00 and to execute a construction contract with Grace Paving & Construction, Inc. for Part 2 in the amount of $1,831,369.84 for the Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Minor Street Improvements project; and to execute a Construction Phase and Observation Services contract with Engineering & Construction Management Services, LLC of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$176,880 for the Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Minor Street Improvements project. These are multi-year contracts with a 1-year base plus two 1-year extensions. This Motion was recommended to the regular agenda. 34. Engineering Design Contract for the O. N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase I Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an Engineering Design contract with LNV, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$95,467 for the O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase I for design, bid and construction phase services. Corpus Christi Page 21 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 This Motion was recommended to the consent agenda. 35. Engineering construction contract for the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant Emissions and Odor Control Improvements Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a construction contract with J.S. Haren Company of Athens, Tennessee in the amount of$207,000 for the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant Emissions & Odor Control Improvements project for the Base Bid. This Motion was recommended to the consent agenda. 36. Service Agreement for Tire Disposal Service Motion approving a service agreement with Texas Land Reclamation LLC, dba UTW Tire Collection Services, Donna, Texas, for Used Tire Disposal Service in accordance with Bid Event No. 85, based on lowest responsive, responsible bid for an estimated annual expenditure of$112,134.00, of which $37,378.00 is required for the remainder of FY 2015-2016. The term of the contract will be for twelve months with options to extend for up to two additional twelve-month periods, subject to the approval of the Contractor and the City Manager or designee. Funds have been budgeted by the Fleet Maintenance Services and Solid Waste Departments in FY 2015-2016. This Motion was recommended to the consent agenda. 37. Service Agreement for Security Guard and Bailiff Services for Municipal Court Resolution finding the lowest responsive responsible bidder for commissioned security guard and bailiff services in response to Bid Event No. 95; awarding a service agreement to Deacon 10, LLC, of Euclid, Ohio, dba Premier Protective Services; and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a service agreement with the lowest responsible bidder for commissioned security guard and bailiff services. This Resolution was recommended to the consent agenda. 38. Resolution to intervene in AEP's filing at the Public Utility Commission for a Distribution Cost Recovery Factor Resolution of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas to authorize intervention in the Public Utility Commission of Texas Docket No. 45787 regarding AEP Texas Central Company's application for approval of a distribution cost recovery factor to increase distribution Corpus Christi Page 22 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes May 17,2016 rates within the city; finding that the city's reasonable rate case expenses shall be reimbursed by the company; finding that the meeting at which this resolution is passed is open to the public as required by law; requiring notice of this resolution to the company and legal counsel. This Resolution was recommended to the consent agenda. 39. Resolution supporting the approval of bonds and a project relative to Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Resolution of the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, authorizing the Mayor to approve the issuance of(1) The New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation Student Housing Revenue Bonds (CHF - Collegiate Housing Island Campus, L.L.C. - Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi Island Campus Project) Series 2016A and to approve the project to be acquired with the proceeds of such Bonds, and (11) The New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation Student Housing Revenue Bonds (CHF - Collegiate Housing Corpus Christi 11, L.L.C. - Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Project) Series 2016A and to approve the project to be acquired with the proceeds of such Bonds This Resolution was recommended to the consent agenda. S. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 5:33 p.m. Corpus Christi Page 23 Printed on 5/20/2016 City Of Corpus Christi COMMISSION ON CHILDREN & YOUTH BOARD DETAILS The Commission on Children&Youth supports a i& SIZE 1 Seats comprehensive system of services and advances policies to in meet the needs of Corpus Christi's children,youth and their TERM LENGTH 3 Years families, including gathering information from people and or entities to act as a source of information and referral on OVERVIEW TERM LIM IT 6 Years issues concerning children,developing an annual communityaction plan for children,youth and their families, advising the City Council on acquiring and allocating children and youth's resources and services,strengthening communications and encouraging partnerships between public and private entities working with children and youth, and serving as an advocate for local,state and federal policy benefitting children,youth and their families to the City Council,and to others as authorized bythe Council. COMPOSITION The commission shall consist of nine(9) members appointed by the City Council. F-i Each appointee shall have demonstrated interest in the welfare of children ormmuyouth through occupation or through association with conity-based organizations. Members shall be representative of each of the following fields: (1) Health and Human Services,(1) - Law Enforcement,(1) - Education,(1) -Youth and Family Services,(1) - Nueces County District Attorney's Office,and(3) -At- DETAILS Large members.One(1) member shall be a youth representative from 16 to 21 years of age at time of appointment.Any member w ho ceases substantial activity in the field or office represented,automatically resigns from the commssion. (On 10-10-95,Council approved the addition of a Police Officer to serve as an Advisory Member to be appointed by the Police Chief.) CREATION 1 AUTHORITY Sec. 2-217;Ord.021927,4/26/94;Ord.022728, 10-15-96,Ord.023452,9-29-98, Ord.029813,4-30-13. MEETS 3rd Monday at 5:30 p.m.,City Hall,Staff Conference Room. TERM DETAILS Three-year staggered terms. DEPARTMENT Parks and Recreation Department COMMITTEE/SUBCOMMITEE AGENDAS OTHER INFORMATION Commission on Children and Youth Members May 24,2016 Four(4)vacancies with terms to 5/1/17 and 5/1/19 representing the following categories: 1-At-Large,1-Education,1-Health and Human Services, 1-Youth Representative. Warren Andrich COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH Resigned District 2 1 05/01/17 At-Large Member Heather Butscher COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH Resigned District 5 1 05/01/16 Health&Human Services Member Dr.Ridge Hammons COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH Met the six-year term limitation District 5 2 05/01/16 Education Chair Cassandra R.Huff COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH Not seeking reappointment District 4 Partial 05/01/16 Youth Representative Member Danny Kollaja COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH Active District 2 2 05/01/17 At-Large Member David Dow COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH Active District 4 1 05/01/17 Law Enforcement Member Joseph N.Miller COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH Active District 2 1 05/01/18 Youth&Family Services Member Donine Schwartz COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH Active District 2 1 05/01/18 At-Large Member Clarissa Silva COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH Active District 2 2 05/01/18 District Attorney's Office Member Tim Wilson COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH Active N/A Police Officer Advisory Commission on Children and Youth Applicants May 24,2016 Abel Alonzo COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH Di-i,t5 At-Large Jo Anne Estrada COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH Di-itt4 Housing and Community Services,Inc. At-Large 8610 N.New Braunfels Ave.,#500 Sen Antonio TX 361-903-0465 Jonathan I.Gain COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH Di-itt3 St.John Paul High School At-Large end Education 3036 Saratoga Boulevard Corpus Christi TX Melissa Hofstetter COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH District 3 The Council on Alcohol&Drug Abuse At-Large and Health and Human Services 1801 S.Alameda,S Vlte 150 Corpus Christi TX 361-854-9199 Brendan J.Hoover COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH District 5 Student Youth Representative,16-21 years of age at time of appointment Madeleine Patterson COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH District 2 Student Youth Representative,16-21 years of age at time of appointment Zoya S.Sorani COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH District 3 Student Youth Representative,16-21 years of age et time of appointment Gilbert Z.Trevino COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH District 1 Student Youth Representative,16-21 years of age at time of appointment BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FORA CITY BOARD, Submit Date:Apr 01, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Abel Alonzo Prefix First Name Middle Last Name Initial Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? COMMISSION ON CHILDREN & YOUTH, COMMITTEE FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES Street Address Suite orApt q= WM_ oft City State Postal Code District 5 What district do you live in? lmwmmn� Primary Phone Alternate Phone Employer Job Title WorkAddress-StreetAddressand Suite Number WorkAddress-City WorkAddress-State WorkAddress-Zip Code Work Phone Work E-mail address Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: No Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) See attached. Registered Voter? 0 Yes 0 No Current resident of the city? Q Yes Q No If yes,how many years? Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Hispanic Ethnicity Male Gender Verification City Code Requirement ® IAgree Consent for Release of Information ® IAgree ® IAgree Board-specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? ® Youth and Family Services Nuecesoun Believe C ty I B ev In Me Foundation BOARD OF TRUSTEES Abel Alonzo Chairperson Pete Anaya 5K/2Mile Run-Walk and Roll Vice Chairperson Against Carlos Vargas Treasurer Gangs, Drugs and Violence June Martinez Secretary Pastor Jesse Alonzo March 1, 2016 Parliamentarian Retha Cable Board of Trustee Dear Friends, Norma Rivera Board of Trustee Linda Benavides My name is Abel Alonzo and,I am the founder of the Nueces Board of Trustee County I Believe In Me Foundation. The foundation is a qualified Cmdr.Santiago Escalante 501(c)3 that is raising funds to educate our youth about the Board of Trustee consequences of becoming involved with gangs, drugs and Chelsea Craig violence. All funds will be used to educate our youth as we provide Board of Trustee positive role models that have overcome such challenges and Eric J.Cantu demonstrated achievement in the community. Board of Trustee Roxana Sandoval Board of T►uslee The foundation is comprised of a Board of Trustees of citizens ADVISORY COMMITTEE: from the Nueces County area along with volunteers in the Hon.Judge Nanette Hasetle community. We are currently soliciting sponsors for our and Hon.Judge Guy Williams Annual 5K/2Mile Run-Walk and Roll event. Hon.Judge Jose Longoria Unlike most other 5K 2Mile events held in Corpus Christi this Hon.Judge Bobby Galvan � Hon.Judge Jack W.Pulcher event will be held in an area of the City that has historically been Hon.Judge Lisa Goraales socially and economically disadvantaged. The foundation believes Hon.Judge Robert Vargas that we must reach our youth in the communities where they live Hon.Judge Deeanne Galvan which is why the event is being held in an area of town that is Hon.Judge Mark H.Woemer largely ignored for events of this type. Hon.Judge Timothy McCoy Han.Judge Martha Quintanilla Your sponsorship of this event will not only provide a tax Han.Judge Henry Santana deductible contribution for your business, sponsorship will also Hon.Judge Bobby Balderas provide you with direct marketing to the participants and the Hon.Judge Joe Benavides nearby community members who will become involved in this Hon.Melissa Madrigal event. Hon.District Attorney Mark Skurka Hon.County Attorney Laura Jimenez (OVER} Hon.Sheriff Jim Kaelin In Memoriam: Hon.Judge Thomas GreenwelI "I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. "Philippians 4:13 Our goal is to raise $10,000 for the foundation with this event and your support will help us achieve that goal. Investing in our youth is one of the most important activities that leaders like you can participate in for this community. Please consider being part of this very worthwhile cause and event. Please make checks to Nueces County I Believe In Me Foundation and send to Abel Alonzo, 1701 Thames#133, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412. We need sponsorships of $25, $50, $100, $250, $500 or more! Please help us to help our children! The event will be held on Saturday, May 28, 2016, at 8:00 A.M. at Manuel Q. Salinas Park, 1354 Airport Road, Corpus Christi, Texas 78416. ely, Abel Alonzo Chairperson Nueces County I Believe In Me Foundation THANK YOU! GOD BLESS! BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FORA CITY BOARD, Submit Date:Apr 13, 2015 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Jo Anne Estrada Prefix First Name Middle Last Name Initial Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? COMMISSION ON CHILDREN & YOUTH Street Address Suite orApt q= WM_ City State Postal Code District 4 What district do you live in? lmwmmn� Primary Phone Alternate Phone Housing and Community Services, Inc. Regional Services Manager Employer Job Title 8610 N. New Braunfels Ave. #500 WorkAddress-StreetAddressand Suite Number San Antonio WorkAddress-City Texas WorkAddress-State 78217 WorkAddress-Zip Code 361-903-0465 Work Phone Work E-mail address Home/Primary Address Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: No Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Professional Service Coordinator Certification, Community Outreach Director for the Minority Advance ment Project, Board of Directors for the Coastal Bend Community Response Coalition Registered Voter? Q Yes 0 No Current resident of the city? Q Yes 0 No 7 years If yes,how many years? JORESUME 2015.docx Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Hispanic Ethnicity Female Gender Verification City Code Requirement ® IAgree Consent for Release of Information ® IAgree ® IAgree Board-specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? ® Youth and Family Services Jo Anne Estrada Professional Summary A professional career in a social service agency that will utilize my administrative experience,initiative and interpersonal skills. Experience Housing and Community Service,Inc. Regional Services Manager • Supervise Services Managers and oversee programming at 15 properties 03/2014 to Present • facilitates resident oriented activities with the goal of developing cohesive community • Ensure compliance and observe internal QA procedures and evaluate their effectiveness • Serves as official liaison and channel of communications for all matters relating to the community learning center • Assists residents in the development and maintenance of a resident council or similar organization • Provide weekly,monthly and quarterly reports to Director of Resident Services and Board of Directors Women's Shelter of South Texas Criminal Justice Advocate 07/2011 to 3/2014 Assist victims of domestic violence and sexual assault navigate the legal system Evaluate clients'eligibility for immigration benefits and possible bars to immigration. Assist eligible clients with completion of appropriate immigration benefit application and proper filing. Assist immigrants with filling out immigration forms Prepare affidavits for VAWA and U Visa applications Attend trainings on immigration law and keep updated by reading e-mails and other sources. Accompany clients to court for civil and criminal proceedings Assist clients with filling out applications for protective orders and Crime Victims Compensation Corpus Christi Metro Ministries 05/2010 to 07/2011 Client Services Coordinator Community outreach and education Assist clients with information and referral Assist clients with obtaining/retaining employment Women's Shelter of South Texas Jo Anne Estrada Client Services Manager 01/2008 to 01/2010 Supervise staff for a 24 hour shelter:case managers,resident advocates,legal advocate,receptionist and housekeeper Provide training for staff on family violence issues and advocacy Maintain the shelter facility and coordinate repairs and special projects Facilitating staff meetings,reviewing timesheets and making sure that all documentation and case notes are correct and complete in a timely manner Community outreach and education Develop relationships with community partners,distribute culturally relevant prevention and education materials and deliver bi- lingual Spanish presentations on domestic violence and sexual assault issues. Develop and maintain programs to assist clients in obtaining and retaining employment Evaluate clients'eligibility for immigration benefits and possible bars to immigration. Assist eligible clients with completion of appropriate immigration benefit application and proper filing. Assist immigrants with filling out immigration forms Prepare affidavits for VAWA and U Visa applications Attend tramings on immigration law and keep updated by reading e-mails and other sources. Accompany clients to court for civil and criminal proceedings Assist clients with filling out applications for protective orders and Crime Victims Compensation 10/2004 to 01/2008 The Bridge Over Troubled Waters Case Manager Assist survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault with long term and short term goal planning Assist clients with legal accompaniments for prosecution in criminal cases,protective orders,child support,custody and divorce. Provided information and referral,safety planning,and needs assessment Assist clients with the VAWA and U-visa application process Evaluate clients'eligibility for immigration benefits and possible bars to immigration. Assist eligible clients with completion of appropriate immigration benefit application and proper filing. Assist immigrants with filling out immigration forms Prepare affidavits for VAWA and U Visa applications Attend trainings on immigration law and keep updated by reading e-mails and other sources. Accompany clients to court for civil and criminal proceedings Assist clients with filling out applications for protective orders and Crime Victims Compensation On call accompaniments to hospitals and police departments Starting,organizing,and facilitating support groups in the community Liaison for Pasadena,South Houston,Jacinto City and Galena Park police departments Education 2006-2009 School Pursuing a degree in Psychology Deans List Spring Semester 2007, Phi theta Kappa Honors Society Special Skills Fluent in Spanish and English Extensive experience working with immigrants from various cultures and countries, such as: Mexico, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Columbia, Cuba, China and Canada Jo Anne Estrada Interests I am currently the Community Outreach Director for the Minority Advancement Project(MAP)in Corpus Christi,TX and serve on the Board of Directors for the Coastal Bend Community Response Coalition Region 8 representative for the Legal Advocacy Network(TCFV), Co-Chair for the Legal Advocacy Network, Voces Unidas (TCFV), Planning and Networking Advisory Committee MHMR,Arte Sana,ALAS, Corpus Christi Bay Kiwanas, Promotions Director Hurricane Alley Roller Derby, Board of Directors Creative Connections(Festival of the Arts) References Solomon Ortiz Jr./Minority Advancement Project- Robert Garza/Texas RioGrande Legal Aid,Inc. - Patricia Castillo/ P.E.A.C.E.Initiative George Vela/ Corpus Christi Metro Ministries - Ruth Alvarado/The Women's Shelter of South Texa BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FORA CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Mar 04, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Jonathan I Gain Prefix First Name Middle Last Name Initial Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? COMMISSION ON CHILDREN & YOUTH Street Address Suite orApt q= WM_ City State Postal Code District 3 What district do you live in? lmwmmn� Primary Phone Alternate Phone Biology Instructor/STEM Saint John Paul II High School Coordinator Employer Job Title 3036 Saratoga Boulevard WorkAddress-StreetAddressand Suite Number Corpus Christi WorkAddress-City TX WorkAddress-State 78415 WorkAddress-Zip Code Work Phone jgain@jpiihighschool.org Work E-mail address Home/Primary Address Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: I do not currently serve on any City board, commission, or committee. Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) I hold a bachelor's in Organismal Biology from Central Washington University and a master's in Biology from Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi. I am also a certified teacher in the state of Texas. I am involved with the community through STEM outreach in relation to the Texas State Aquarium and through the Ocean Exploration Trust, where I served as an ambassador aboard Dr. Robert Ballard's research vessel, the EN Nautilus. I am also pioneering a new engineering track series in a concerted effort with Flint Hills Resources that will involve students presenting intellectual property to professional engineers and the program will also require students to design and build wheelchair ramps for the disabled in our community. Registered Voter? QQ Yes Q No Current resident of the city? QQ Yes O No 9 If yes,how many years? Jonathan Gain 2015 Resume- ci . df Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Ethnicity Male Gender Verification City Code Requirement ® IAgree Consent for Release of Information ® IAgree ® IAgree Board-specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? ® Education Jonathan I. Gain PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION Central Washington University 3.114 GPA B.S. Biology 09/2001-06/2007 Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi 3.903 GPA M.S. Biology 08/2007-05/2011 RESEARCH EXPERIENCE RESEARCH ASSISTANT,CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SEP 2006-JUN 2007 • Assisted Dr. Johnson in Saprolegnia research • Presented findings at SOURCE Symposium 2007 • Designed experiments to determine Saprolegnia affinity for glyphosate RESEARCH ASSISTANT,CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY OCT 2006-JUN 2007 • Assisted Dr. James in stream ecology research • Presented findings at SOURCE Symposium 2007 • Aided in description of stream ecology changes with respect to stream diversion • Conducted entomological identification RESEARCH ASSISTANT,TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-CORPUS CHRISTI MAY 2008-AUG 2008 • Collection of benthic samples • Sorting of benthic samples • Identification of benthic organisms THESIS RESEARCH,TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-CORPUS CHRISTI MAR 2008-MAY 2011 • Determination of prevalence of Hematodinium parasites in blue crabs • Examination of sex ratios of blue crabs in local bays • Examination of the effects of abiotic factors and gender on the prevalence and intensity of Hematodinium in blue crabs TECHNICAL RESEARCH ASSISTANT,TEXAS AGRILIFE RESEARCH&EXTENSION SEP 2010-OCT 2011 CENTER-FLOUR BLUFF MARICULTURE LABORATORY • Determination of optimal conditions for algae growth of various algal species for use in biofuel • Assist in maintaining super-intensive zero-exchange bait shrimp raceway systems • Determination of ideal growout conditions for bait shrimp, including the examination of density dependence on growth and the effectiveness of biofloc in zero-exchange raceway systems PERTINENT SHILLS COMPUTER: Microsoft Word,Microsoft EXCEL, SPSS,MiniTab LABORATORY: Identification of insects, fish,plants, and various other benthic organisms, gel electrophoresis,PCR, fish staining and dissection, excellent microscopy skills, culture of water molds and other fungi,titrations, cell staining procedures,biological oxygen demand tests,TSS, TDS,water quality parameters,photospectrometry, familiar with quality control methods and documentation processes FIELD: Point-quarter method of population estimates,mark-recapture methods, seining,trawling,benthic sleds, drop sampling,use of topographic maps, small boat and trailer experience,coring techniques, knowledgeable with local fauna,research design,use of crab traps,various water quality analyses Jonathan I. Gain PROFESSIONAL ABSTRACTS AND PRESENTATIONS Gain,J.,P. James(2007)Ecological Impact of Wilson Creek Stream Diversion. Symposium on University Research and Creative Expression. Ellensburg,WA. Gain,J.,J. Johnson(2007)Effects of the Herbicide Roundup on the Growth of Pathogenic Strains of Saprolegnia. Symposium on University Research and Creative Expression. Ellensburg, WA. Gain,J.,K. Withers(2010)Prevalence of Hematodinium in the blue crab(Callinectes sapidus)in the Corpus Christi system and Aransas Bay, Texas,U.S.A. Benthic Ecology Meeting. Wilmington,NC. Gain,J.,K. Withers(2010)Prevalence of Hematodinium in Callinectes sapidus in the Corpus Christi and Aransas Bay Systems. 9t'Annual Sea Grant Researcher Conference. Port Aransas,TX. Gain,J.I.,K.Withers(2010)Prevalence of Hematodinium in Callinectes sapidus in the Corpus Christi and Aransas Bay Systems. Gulf Estuarine Research Society Meeting. Port Aransas, TX. AWARDS 2007 College of Science and Technology Graduate Scholarship 2008 Graduate Assistant Scholarship 2008 Competitive Academic Scholarship 2009 Hans and Patricia Suter Endowment 2010 Graduate Assistant Scholarship 2014 Texas Workforce Commission New Team Robotics Grant(8 Total) 2015 Ocean Exploration Trust Nautilus Ambassador 2015 Seaperch Grant Recipient(4 Total) EMPLOYMENT JUL 2011-PRESENT Saint John Paul II High School Biology Instructor/STEM Coordinator AUG 2011—OCT 2012 Kaplan University Environmental Science Instructor SEP 2010—OCT 2011 Texas Agrilife Research&Extension Center(Texas A&M system)— Flour Bluff Mariculture Laboratory JUN 2010—AUG 2010 Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Introductory Biology Laboratory Instructor(Adjunct Professor/Graduate Teaching Assistant) .TAN 2010—MAY 2010 Texas General Land Office Intern AUG 2009—JAN 2010 Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Introductory Biology Laboratory Instructor(Graduate Teaching Assistant) MAY 2009—AUG 2009 Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Environmental Science Laboratory Instructor(Graduate Teaching Assistant) AUG 2008—MAY 2009 Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Organic Chemistry Laboratory Instructor(Graduate Teaching Assistant) OCT 2008—MAR 2009 Texas State Aquarium Volunteer MAY 2008—AUG 2008 Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Graduate Research Assistant AUG 2007—MAY 2008 Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Introductory Biology Laboratory Instructor(Graduate Teaching Assistant) JUN 2005-1UN 2007 Fred Meyer-Stocking and Recovery Assistant .TUN 2004—.TAN 2005 Longitude 122 LLC-Construction Laborer SEP 2003—MAY 2004 Mountainview Meadows-Nursing Assistant Jonathan I. Gain REFERENCES Dr. Kim Withers Associate Research Assistant Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi,Center for Coastal Studies 6300 Ocean Drive,Unit 5866 Corpus Christi,TX 78412 Kim.Withers@tamucc.edu (361) 825-5907 Perry Le Grange Principal Saint John Paul II High School 3036 Saratoga Boulevard Corpus Christi,TX 78415 plegrange@jpiihighschool.org (361) 855-5744 Michael Trudeau Assistant Principal Saint John Paul II High School 3036 Saratoga Boulevard Corpus Christi,TX 78415 mtrudeau@jpiihighschool.org (361) 855-5744 BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FORA CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Jan 27, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Melissa Hofstetter Prefix First Name Middle Last Name Initial Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? CITIZENS ADVISORY HEALTH BOARD, COMMISSION ON CHILDREN &YOUTH, COMMUNITYYOUTH DEVELOPMENT(78415) PROGRAM STEERING COMMITTEE, CORPUS CHRISTI CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU, SISTER CITY COMMITTEE Street Address Suite orApt oft City State Postal Code District 3 What district do you live in? 10000� Primary Phone Alternate Phone The Council on Alcohol & Drug Abuse Executive Director Employer Job Title 1801 S.Alameda, Suite 150 WorkAddress-StreetAddressand Suite Number Corpus Christi WorkAddress-City TX WorkAddress-State 78404 WorkAddress-Zip Code 361-854-9199 Work Phone mhofstetter@coada-cb.org Work E-mail address Work Address Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: Not at this time Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Licensed Social Worker I am a member of several local coalitions and committees Registered Voter? Q Yes Q No Current resident of the city? 0 Yes 0 No 22 If yes,how many years? resume3.doc Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Ethnicity Female Gender Verification City Code Requirement ® IAgree Consent for Release of Information ® IAgree ® IAgree Board-specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * ® Health and Human Services ® Youth and Family Services Question applies to CORPUS CHRISTI CONVENTION&VISITORS BUREAU. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? ® None of the Above McCissa Hofstetter, EDSW Core • Budget/ Contracts • Staff Development Competencies • Community Partner Development • Team Building & Performance Program & Project Management Improvement Education Texas &M University Kingsville, Texas July 2006— May 2008 Graduated May 2008, GPA: 3.6/4.0 Major: Social Work(BSW) Minor: Psychology Work Experience The Council on Alcohol&Drug Abuse—Coastal Bend January 2016— Present Corpus Christi, Texas Executive Director Duties: Manage day-to-day operations of The Council, including staff supervision; ensure adherence to contractual, grant, and other funding entities' rules and requirements; responsible for all aspects of development, implementation, improvement, and expansion of The Council's programs The Council on Alcohol&Drug Abuse—Coastal Bend February 2014—January 2016 Corpus Christi, Texas Program Coordinator, Tobacco Prevention& Control Coalition Duties: Facilitate DSHS grant for tobacco prevention and cessation for Nueces County; supervised employees; responsible for carrying out grant objectives and state reporting; facilitated community coalition; built community capacity Beha vroral Health Center of Nueces County(formerly MHMR) May 2013 —April 2014 Corpus Christi, Texas Program Supervisor Duties: Responsible for day to day functioning of 24-hour crisis respite unit; supervised 16 employees HCA Healthcare—Northwest Behavioral Hospital December 2012 —April 2013 Corpus Christi, Texas Social Worker Duties: Work with mental health patients and their families; discharge planning; provide resources for patients leaving the hospital Spaulding for Children May 2008 — December 2012 Corpus Christi, Texas Adoption Coordinator Duties: Caseworker for families wanting to adopt children through the Texas foster care system; recruitment and training of families; perform home visits and write detailed home study; match families to children; supervise placements; facilitate adoptive family support group; post-adoption services Hofstetter, 2 Spaulding for Children August 2007— May 2008 Corpus Christi, Texas Internship/Practicum Secretarial Solutions May 2004— May 2008 Corpus Christi, Texas Owner(part-time business) Duties: Medical billing, bookkeeping, practice management, desktop publishing, notary, web site design Treats Vending April 1999 — May 2007 Corpus Christi, Texas Office Manager Duties: Bookkeeping, AP/AR, deposits, payroll, sales tax, manage vending routes, inventory control Volunteer Work Communities Voices United October 2010 — Present Corpus Christi, Texas Committee Member Heart Gallery of South Texas September 2007 - 2014 Corpus Christi, Texas Committee Member CASA of the Coastal Bend May 2006—June 2011 Corpus Christi, Texas CASA (Court Appointed Specia/Advocate) Professional National Association of Social Workers Affiliations Member, National and Texas Chapters Activities Board of Directors Coastal Bend Alliance for Youth (CBAY) Secretary April 2012 —2014 Volunteer Advisory Board / Wrap Around Committee Chair CASA of the Coastal Bend March 2008—June 2011 References Available on Request BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FORA CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Jul 01, 2015 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Brendan J Hoover Prefix First Name Middle Last Name Initial Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? COMMISSION ON CHILDREN & YOUTH, HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION Street Address Suite orApt q= WM_ City State Postal Code District 5 What district do you live in? lmwmmn� Primary Phone Alternate Phone Employer Job Title WorkAddress-StreetAddressand Suite Number WorkAddress-City WorkAddress-State WorkAddress-Zip Code Work Phone Work E-mail address Home/Primary Address Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Included in Resume Registered Voter? 0 Yes # No Current resident of the city? Q Yes 0 No 14 If yes,how many years? Resume.docx Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Ethnicity Male Gender Verification City Code Requirement ® IAgree Consent for Release of Information ® IAgree ® IAgree Board-specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * ® Youth Representative, 16 - 21 years of age at time of appointment Resume Brendan Joseph Hoover Objective To obtain a position with a local organization with an excellent reputation in our community Education W.B. Ray High School • 1002 Texan Trail • Corpus Christi,TX 78411 • Will graduate, June, 2017 • Grade Point Average: 93.25 Activities • W.B. Ray Debate Club (2013—present) • St. Patrick's Catholic Church Youth Group(2012-present) • W.B. Ray Student Council(2013-2014) Honors • 1St Place,UIL Lincoln Douglas Debate (2014) • 4t'Place,UIL,Persuasive Extemporaneous Speaking(2014) • 1St Place UIL,Lincoln Douglas Debate (2015) Experience • Driscoll's Children Hospital Summer Volunteen(2014) • Guest Services Ortho/Neuro Clinic helper • Cookie shop cashier Special Skills • Food Handler Permit • Certified in Microsoft Office Word,Excel,and PowerPoint • Trained in Microsoft Office Access and Publisher Hobbies • Reading • Listening to music References Provided separately BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FORA CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Jul 01, 2015 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Madeleine Patterson Prefix First Name Middle Last Name Initial Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? COMMISSION ON CHILDREN & YOUTH, HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION Street Address Suite orApt q= WM_ City State Postal Code District 2 What district do you live in? lmwmmn� Primary Phone Alternate Phone Employer Job Title WorkAddress-StreetAddressand Suite Number WorkAddress-City WorkAddress-State WorkAddress-Zip Code Work Phone Work E-mail address Home/Primary Address Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) STUDENTAT W.B. RAY HIGH SCHOOL- CURRENTLYA SOPHOMORE WILL BEA JUNIOR FOR 2015- 2016 SCHOOL YEAR. VOLUNTEERS TO FEED THE HOMELESS AND AT MOTHER THERESA'S SHELTER IMPACT YOUTH GROUP, LEAD VOCALIST IN CHURCH BAND,AND TEACH SUNDAY SCHOOLAT CATHEDRAL OF THE PALMS Registered Voter? 0 Yes Q No Current resident of the city? OQ Yes 0 No 15 If yes,how many years? Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Hispanic Ethnicity Female Gender Verification City Code Requirement ® IAgree Consent for Release of Information ® IAgree ® IAgree Board-specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to COMMISSION ON CHILDREN&YOUTH. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * ® Youth Representative, 16 - 21 years of age at time of appointment Question applies to HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * ® Youth Representative (not more than 20 years of age at time of appointment) BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FORA CITY BOARD, Submit Date: May 05, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Gilbert Z. Prefix First Name Middle Initial Email Address Trevino Last Name Which Boards would you like to apply for? COMMISSION ON CHILDREN & YOUTH Street Address Suite orApt City District 1 State What district do you live in? 11111111111111111111111 Primary Phone Alternate Phone Employer Job Title WorkAddress- Street Address and Suite Number WorkAddress - City WorkAddress - State WorkAddress- Zip Code Postal Code Work Phone trevigz075©ccisd.us Work E-mail address Home/PrimaryAddress Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Corpus Christi Police Departments Explorer Post #133 Registered Voter? QYes Qi No Current resident of the city? QQ Yes Q No 16 If yes, how many years? Gilbert Trevino Resume 2.docx Upload a Resume Plea upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Hispanic Ethnicity Male Gender Verification City Code Requirement Z IAgree Consent for Release of Information Z !Agree ® !Agree Board -specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to COMMISSION ON CHILDREN & YOUTH. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * Z Youth Representative, 16 - 21 years of age at time of appointment Gilbert Trevino Objectives To be the Youth Representative for the City of Corpus Christi's Commission on Children & Youth. Experience Secretary of Roy Miller High School's Sophomore Council 9/1/2015 Date of Position : 9/1/2015 — 6/2/2016 Corpus Christi, Texas Extracurricular Activities ■ Corpus Christi Police Explorers Post #133 ■ Secretary of Roy Miller High School Sophomore Council ■ National Honor Society of Roy Miller High School ■ Key Club of Roy Miller High School Speech Competitions for the Rotary Club of Corpus Christi Golf Roy Miller High School Student Council Tabernacle of Church Youth Group Academic Education Dates of Attendance : 8/25/2014 To Present Roy Miller High School Corpus Christi, Texas References References are available on requests • Melissa Martinez — (361)774-5347 • Lieutenant William Broyles — (361)826-2968 • Officer Kimberly Pfiefer — (361)960-8379 • Sergeant Billy Flores — (361)549-4535 • Priscila Villagomez Baldillez — (361)813-8009 • Mari Ortiz — (361)215-8998 BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FORA CITY BOARD, Submit Date: May 15, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Zoya S Prefix First Name Middle Initial Email Address Surani Last Name Which Boards would you like to apply for? COMMISSION ON CHILDREN & YOUTH, HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION Street Address Suite orApt City District 3 State What district do you live in? 11111111111111111111111 Primary Phone Alternate Phone Veterans Memorial High School Student Employer Job Title WorkAddress- Street Address and Suite Number WorkAddress - City WorkAddress - State WorkAddress- Zip Code Postal Code Work Phone zoyasurani@gmail.com Work E-mail address Home/PrimaryAddress Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: No Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Incoming Junior at the Veterans Memorial High School and enrolled as a Dual -Credit Student at Del Mar College. Registered Voter? QYes ONo Current resident of the city? Q Yes Q No 16 years If yes, how many years? Zoya_Surani Resume.docx Upload a Resume Plea upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Asian or Pacific Islander Ethnicity Female Gender Verification City Code Requirement Z IAgree Consent for Release of Information Z !Agree ® !Agree Board -specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to COMMISSION ON CHILDREN & YOUTH. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * Z Youth Representative, 16 - 21 years of age at time of appointment Question applies to HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * ® Youth Representative (not more than 20 years of age at time of appointment) Zoya S. Surani EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVE I plan on attending a four-year university and obtaining a Bachelor of Science. Upon completion of my Bachelor's degree, I plan to attend medical school and pursue a career in neonatology. I have been immensely involved in community outreach projects and have been a co-founder of both Project KNIGHTS (Keep Nurturing and Inspiring Good Habits in Teen Sleep) and iConquer (a project that targets both obesity and diabetes in 3-7 year old children.) EDUCATION Veterans Memorial High School—Class of 2018 3830 Rodd Field Rd Corpus Christi, TX 78414 NATIONAL AWARDS AND ACHIEVEMENTS 1" Place in the Sonatina and Sonata International Piano Competition; performed in renowned Carnegie Hall, New York as a finalist for the Sonatina and Sonata International Piano Competition— Grades 7 and 9 President's Gold Volunteer Service Award DI Global Finals 2010 SCHOLARSHIPS AND GRANT AWARDS Received $5,000 grant from Earl C. Sam's Foundation to continue research in childhood diabetes and obesity and proceed in creating a 3D animation movie for Project iConquer Received $8,000 grant from the American Sleep Medicine Foundation for research in sleep deprivation among teenagers Received $10,000 grant from Earl C. Sam's Foundation to continue research in sleep deprivation among adolescents and healthy living habits among children STATE ACHIEVEMENTS Texas Quiz Show Semifinalist DI State Finalist 2009, 2010 Mock Trial State 2015 ACTIVITIES Cofounder, iConquer Treasurer, Freshman Council Member of the District Food Advisory Team Member of the National Hispanic Institute Mock Trial Team, Witness Executive Board, Student Council Destination Imagination Member of Chopin Society Volunteer for Corpus Christi Jamatkhana CORPS Academic Decathlon OUTREACH PROJECTS Involved in script writing and production of the movie KNIGHTS (Keep Nurturing and Inspiring Good Habits in Teen Sleep) First 3D animated movie about sleep education among teens in the world Received Two Remi Gold Awards from Worldfest Film Festival (2012) Received Gold Award by American Pixar Academy (2012) Involved in script writing and production of "Addicted" music video Received Silver Remi Award at Worldfest Film Festival (2013) Involved in production of "I Care 4 U" Intensive Care Unit education movie Received Silver Remi Award at Worldfest Film Festival (2013) Involved in script writing and production of "iConquer: Chews Wisely "healthy living education movie Involved in script writing and production of "iConquer: Diabetes" education movie COLLABORATIONS THROUGH OUTREACH Mayor of Corpus Christi The Mayor's Fitness Council The Ed Rachel Foundation The Vishal Raj u Bhagat Foundation The Nueces County Community Action Agency The Diabetes Community Coalition Parks and Recreation Active Life Coastal Bend Diabetes Initiative Act Texas A&M Corpus Christi American College of Chest Physicians Junior League Coastal Bend Community Foundation Earl C. Sam Foundation Laverne & Thomas Howell Foundation Hugh `Brian Youth Leadership The Corpus Christi Caller Times CITGO MOVIES AND VIDEO PRODUCTION Wrote script and involved in production of Movie KNIGHTS (Keep Nurturing and Inspiring Good Habits in Teen Sleep), which is the first 3D animated movie about sleep education among teens in the world. This movie has received 3 major awards, including two Remi Gold Award at the Worldfest film festival in 2012 (which is one of the largest film festival in world), and Gold award by American Pixar Academy in 2012. Additionally, this project was presented to children in Thailand in the summer of 2011. Involved in writing script and production of video song "Addicted" which illustrates the story of life cycle of smoker in entertaining and education form. This movie has received Remi Silver Award at the Worldfest film festival in Houston in 4/2013. Involved in production of movie "I Care 4 U", which is a movie designed to educate family members about the Intensive Care Unit, whose loved ones are there in critically ill condition. This movie has also received Remi Silver award at the Worldfest film festival in Houston in 4/2013 Involved in writing the script and production of "iConquer: Chews Wisely" which is a movie designed to educate young children about healthy eating, exercising and important lifestyle choices. Involved in writing the script and production of "iConquer: Diabetes" which is a movie designed to educate young children about childhood obesity and diabetes. EDUCATIONAL SONGS "Blame": Hip-hop and rap song to educate the children about sleep hygiene and the effects of sleep deprivation "Torn": An upbeat song to educate teenagers about hazards of illegal substance abuse and peer pressure. "Addicted": A song depicting the life cycle of smokers in an entertaining way using hip-hop lyrics and dance rhythm. "Conquered": A song of Hip-hop and contemporary style educating children about healthy living as well as diabetes. VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCE Delivering Fruit Baskets to Homeless Shelter It's Your Life Foundation Proj ect Coordinator Corpus Christi Jamatkhana CORPS INTERN AND CLINICAL EXPERIENCE Dr. Alamgir Khan, Spohn Shoreline Hospital Ismaili Jamatkhana (prayer congregation site) Clinic Dr. Mark Morales, Spohn Shoreline Hospital City Of Corpus Christi MAYOR'S FITNESS COUNCIL BOARD DETAILS OVERVIEW As, SIZE 9 Seats TERM LENGTH 2 Years TERM LIMIT 6 Years The Mayor's Fitness Council advises the City Council, City Manager, Parks Department and Health District regarding promotion of healthy living, including but not limited to the following activities: Encourage, promote and enhance healthy living through organized sports, events, diet and everyday activity, all with a strong emphasis on using natural resources. In addition, to collaborate with community leaders in all sectors to develop and implement policy and environmental improvement strategies that will help combat chronic disease such as diabetes, cardio pulmonary disease, and cancer. �q DETAILS COMPOSITION The committee shall consist of nine (9) members appointed by the Mayor w ith approval of the City Council. The committee shall consist of individuals representing the follow ing categories: (1) - Health Care/Medical Professionals, (1) - Worksite Wellness, (1) - Disability Networks, (1) - Senior Initiatives, (1) - Youth Initiatives, (1) - Community Outreach and (3) -At-Large members. Staggered tern are as follows: Five terms shall end in even numbered years: Health Care/Medical Professionals, Senior Initiatives, Youth Initiatives, Community Outreach and one (1) At -Large member. Four terms shall end in odd numbered years: Worksite Wellness, Disability Networks, and two (2) At -Large members. Thereafter, all terms shall be two (2) years. Ex -officio members will include Director of Parks and Recreation and the Director of the City County Public Health District. CREATION / AUTHORITY Ordinance No. 028525, 3/23/10; Ord. 028598, 5/11/10; Ord. 029780, 3/26/13. MEETS Second Thursday of every month, 12:00 p.m., City Hall, Staff Conference Room. TERM DETAILS Two-year staggered terms. DEPARTMENT Parks and Recreation Department COMMITTEE/ SUBCOMMITEE AGENDAS OTHER INFORMATION 11 F- -- :.. . 1 ... - I7Riiirsi Angelina Garcia MAYOR'S FITNESS COUNCIL Not seeking reappointment District 1 Partial 05/11/16 Community Outreach Jacqueline Hamilton MAYOR'S FITNESS COUNCIL Seeking reappointment District 4 Partial 05/11/16 Senior Initiatives 100% 9/9 Rick Hayley MAYOR'S FITNESS COUNCIL Met the six-year term limitation Other / Non -Resident 3 05/11/16 At -Large Vice -Chair Roland Hernandez MAYOR'S FITNESS COUNCIL Not seeking reappointment District 5 1 05/11/16 Youth Initiatives Ana Paez MAYOR'S FITNESS COUNCIL Seeking reappointment District 1 1 05/11/16 Health/Medical Profession Kimberly Cook MAYOR'S FITNESS COUNCIL Active District 5 2 05/11/17 Disability Networks Chair Rodney Brown MAYOR'S FITNESS COUNCIL Active District 1 1 05/11/17 At -Large 82% 9/11 Misty Kesterson MAYOR'S FITNESS COUNCIL Active District 4 1 05/11/17 Worksite Wellness Mayor's Fitness Council Members May 24, 2016 Five (5) vacancies with terms to 5/11/18 representing the following categories: 1 - At -Large, 1 - Community Outreach, 1 - Health/Medical Profession, 1 - Youth Initiatives and 1 - Senior Initiatives. (Note: This is a Mayoral appointment with approval of the City Council.) Victor Betancourt MAYOR'S FITNESS COUNCIL Active District 1 1 05/11/17 At -Large Mayor's Fitness Council Applicants May 24, 2016 Name RIMDistrict: Cate:o Work Address Stephen C. McMains MAYOR'S FITNESS COUNCIL District 2 CrossFit DownTown Corpus Kristina I. Mata MAYOR'S FITNESS COUNCIL District 5 Driscoll Children's Hospital At -Large and Community Outreach Work Phone 318 North Chaparral Corpus Christi TX 361-739-0068 At -Large, Health Care /Medical Professionals and Youth Initiatives 3533 S. Alameda Corpus Christi TX 361-694-5489 Richard Torres MAYOR'S FITNESS COUNCIL District 5 Corpus Christi Independent School District At -Large and Youth Initiatives 801 Leopard Corpus Christi TX 361-793-7661 BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FORA CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Jan 21, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Stephen C Prefix First Name Middle Initial Email Address McMains Last Name Which Boards would you like to apply for? MAYOR'S FITNESS COUNCIL Street Address Suite orApt 1011111111 City State Postal Code District 2 What district do you live in? 1111111111111.111111111 111•111.1•11111 Primary Phone Alternate Phone CrossFit DownTown Corpus Employer 318 North Chaparral WorkAddress- Street Address and Suite Number Corpus Christi WorkAddress - City Texas WorkAddress - State 78401 WorkAddress- Zip Code Owner Job Title 361-739-0068 Work Phone crossfitdtc@gmail.com Work E-mail address Home/PrimaryAddress Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: No Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) President of the Downtown Revitalization Alliance Texas Exes Board Member Founder and Organizer of the St. Patricks Day Festival, Dia De Los Muertos, and Surftoberfest Women and Mens Health Services Org. Board of Directors Committee Member - Cattle Barons Ball - ACS Registered Voter? QYes No Current resident of the city? QYes No 14 If yes, how many years? Upload a Resume Plea upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Ethnicity Male Gender Verification City Code Requirement ® IAgree Consent for Release of Information Z !Agree ® !Agree Board -specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to MAYOR'S FITNESS COUNCIL. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * ® Community Outreach BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FORA CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Feb 26, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Kristina Prefix First Name Middle Initial Email Address Mata Last Name Which Boards would you like to apply for? MAYOR'S FITNESS COUNCIL Street Address Suite orApt 1011111111 City State Postal Code District 5 What district do you live in? 1111111111111.111111111 111•111.1•11111 Primary Phone Alternate Phone Driscoll Children's Hospital Employer 3533 S Alameda WorkAddress- Street Address and Suite Number Corpus Christi WorkAddress - City TX WorkAddress - State 78411 WorkAddress- Zip Code Clinical Dietitian Job Title 361-694-5489 Work Phone kristina.mata©dchstx.org Work E-mail address Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: No Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) EDUCATION Masters of Dietetic Studies in Nutrition and Dietetics Graduated: May 2013 The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX • Coordinated Program in Dietetics Bachelor of Science in Biology Graduated: May 2010 St. Mary's University, San Antonio, TX • Minor: Chemistry COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES Corpus Christi Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 2013 - Present • Special Events Coordinator Position 2015-2016 Junior League of Corpus Christi 2015 - Present Registered Voter? QQYes No Current resident of the city? QQYes No 3 If yes, how many years? Upload a Resume Plea upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Hispanic Ethnicity Female Gender Verification City Code Requirement ® IAgree Consent for Release of Information ® !Agree ® !Agree Board -specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to MAYOR'S FITNESS COUNCIL. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * ® Health Care / Medical Professionals ® Youth Initiatives BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FORA CITY BOARD, Submit Date: May 12, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Richard Torres Prefix First Name Middle Initial Email Address Last Name Which Boards would you like to apply for? MAYOR'S FITNESS COUNCIL Street Address Suite orApt 1011111111 City State Postal Code District 5 What district do you live in? 1111111111111.111111111 111•111.1•11111 Primary Phone Alternate Phone CCISD Employer 801 Leopard WorkAddress- Street Address and Suite Number Corpus Christi WorkAddress - City TX WorkAddress - State 78401 WorkAddress- Zip Code Program Specialist Job Title 361-793-7661 Work Phone richard.torres©ccisd.us Work E-mail address Work Address Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: No Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Bachelor's and Master's from TexasA&I, Kingsville, Tx Council of Alcohol and Tobacco - Board Member Coalition for Cigarettes Registered Voter? DYes No Current resident of the city? Qi Yes Q No 14 If yes, how many years? Upload a Resume Plea upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Other Male Verification City Code Requirement ® IAgree Consent for Release of Information ® !Agree ® !Agree Board -specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to MAYOR'S FITNESS COUNCIL. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * ® Youth Initiatives AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 17, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 DATE: April 21, 2016 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Stacie Talbert, Interim Director, Parks and Recreation Department StacieT@cctexas.com 361-826-3460 Interlocal Agreements to provide bus transportation for 2016 summer programs CAPTION: Resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute separate multi-year Interlocal Agreements with the Calallen Independent School District, the Corpus Christi Independent School District and the Flour Bluff Independent School District, to provide transportation services for summer youth recreation programs. PURPOSE: To allow Calallen, Corpus Christi and Flour Bluff Independent School Districts to provide bus transportation for summer youth participating in the 2016 Latchkey Summer Camp Programs. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The Parks and Recreation Department provides Latchkey Summer Camp Programs at Calallen, Corpus Christi and Flour Bluff Independent School Districts. The multi-year Interlocal Agreements will allow the Independent School Districts to provide bus transportation for field trips and other activities. ALTERNATIVES: Parks and Recreation Latchkey Summer Camps would not provide field trips as part of their programs. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: City Council is required to approve all interlocal agreements. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015- 2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $24,400 $24,400 Encumbered/ Expended Amount This item $24,400 $24,400 BALANCE 0 0 Fund(s): 1020 General Fund, Latchkey Comments: FY16 funds for summer transportation are budgeted in General Fund. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this ordinance. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Interlocal Agreements Resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute separate multi-year Interlocal Agreements with the Calallen Independent School District, the Corpus Christi Independent School District, and the Flour Bluff Independent School District, to provide transportation services for summer youth recreation programs. Be it resolved by the Corpus Christi City Council: Section 1. That the City Manager or designee to execute separate multi-year Interlocal Agreements with the Calallen Independent School District, the Corpus Christi Independent School District, and the Flour Bluff Independent School District, to provide transportation services for summer youth recreation programs. Section 2. This Resolution shall take effect and be in full force immediately after its adoption by the City Council. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas of , 2016 The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Rudy Garza Michael Hunter Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Lillian Riojas Brian Rosas Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughn INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND CALALLEN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR MULTI-YEAR SUMMER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES This agreement (Agreement) is entered into between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home rule municipal corporation (City), and the CalaIlen Independent School District (District) for purposes of the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Texas Government Code, Chapter 791, as amended, to achieve efficiency in meeting intergovernmental responsibilities. WHEREAS, the City is sponsoring a summer recreational program for elementary school age children using several of Corpus Christi Independent School District's school campuses, a Ca!alien Independent School District campus, a Flour Bluff Independent School District school campus, as well as a youth recreation program during the term of this Agreement for school age children, (hereinafter, collectively referred to as the Summer Program); WHEREAS, the City includes travel to various activity sites around the Corpus Christi area as field trips for its Summer Program participants; and WHEREAS, the District agrees to consider requests to provide to the City a sufficient number of District owned school buses, including school buses accessible as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), for a fixed fee per mile as stated herein to transport the Summer Program participants from their respective campuses to the various activity sites. NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the District, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, agree as follows: 1. Term. For summer 2016, this Agreement begins June 20, 2016 and ends July 28, 2016. This Agreement may be renewed for up to four (4) additional summer periods, upon written agreement of the Director of Parks and Recreation and the District Superintendent. 2. Services to be provided. District shall review and consider requests to provide its District school buses (including ADA accessible school buses) and District -employed school bus drivers as needed by the City for transportation for City Summer Program field trip activities. Transportation requests will be considered on a trip by trip basis dependent on the availability of buses and staff. 3. Consideration. For summer 2016, the City shall pay the District $100 per bus used per day to transport students for the City's Summer Program. In future summer extension periods, the price may be increased by up to ten (10) percent upon agreement of the Director of Parks and Recreation and the District Superintendent. District agrees to provide the City with at least 90 days advance written notice of any increases. This payment shall be full compensation to the District for the costs of the school buses, the fuel to run the buses, all maintenance costs for the buses, fleet liability insurance, salary for the bus drivers, and all other related costs and expenses to the District. 4. Biding. The District shall bill the City on a monthly basis. City shall pay the bill within two Fridays after receipt of the bill out of current City revenue. 5. District Bus Maintenance. The District will maintain its buses at its bus maintenance facility during the term of this Agreement as a part of the consideration. 1 6. District Bus Drivers. The school bus drivers assigned by the District to provide services under this Agreement shall be District employees for all purposes. The school bus drivers are not City employees for any purpose. 7. Coordination. The City's Director of Park and Recreation, or designee, shall place a weekly order with the representative from District, or their designee, for the number of buses needed, the sites at which the buses are needed, the address of the activity to be undertaken from each site, the time at which the buses must arrive at each site to pick up the various program participants, and the time at which the buses must arrive at each activity site to pick up the various program participants to return them to their respective sites. Transportation requests will be placed no later than seven days prior to date of departure. 8. Governmental Service. This Agreement is between the City and the District for the purpose of providing transportation between the various Summer Program, and youth recreation program sites and activity sites. 9. Insurance. District agrees to provide following insurance and name City as additional insured: vehicle liability coverage in limits provided by Texas Tort Claims Act for District of $100,000 per person, $300,000 per occurrence, and $100,000 per occurrence of property damage. District also agrees to provide worker's compensation coverage as required by law. In the alternative if District is self insured, District may provide City Director of Parks and Recreation with a letter confirming self insurance coverage in accordance with applicable law. 10. Current Revenue. All money spent for transportation for the Summer Program, and youth recreation program participants through this Agreement must be spent out of currently available revenue of the City and the District. 11. Effective Date and Entirety Clause. This Agreement takes effect on date of last signature. This Agreement expresses the entire agreement between the parties. Any modification, amendment, or addition to this Agreement is not binding upon the parties unless in writing and signed by persons authorized to make such agreements on behalf of the respective party. EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE on the day of , 2016. ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta Ronald L. Olson City Secretary City Manager Ma*., Approved as to legal form April 7-, 2016. By: Lisa Aguilar, Ass! tent City g Attorney for City Attorney 2 CALALLEN INDEPE N ENT SCHOOL DISTRICT By: C\-8-1,--k-W.k Vi. Arturo Almendarez, Ed. Superintendent Date: F l it INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND CORPUS CHRISTI INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR MULTI-YEAR SUMMER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES This agreement (Agreement) is entered into between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home rule municipal corporation (City), and the Corpus Christi Independent School District (District) far purposes of the interlocal Cooperation Act, Texas Government Code, Chapter 791, as amended, to achieve efficiency in meeting intergovernmental responsibilities. WHEREAS, the City is sponsoring a summer recreational program for elementary school age children using several of Corpus Christi Independent School District's school campuses, a Calallen independent School District campus, a Flour Bluff Independent School District school campus, as well as a youth recreation program during the term of this Agreement for school age children, (hereinafter, collectively referred to as the Summer Program); WHEREAS, the City includes travel to various activity sites around the Corpus Christi area as field trips for its Summer Program participants; and WHEREAS, the District agrees to consider requests to provide to the City a sufficient number of District owned school buses, including school buses accessible as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), for a fixed fee per mile as stated herein to transport the Summer Program participants from their respective campuses to the various activity sites. NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the District, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, agree as follows: 1. Term. For summer 2016, this Agreement begins June 20, 2016 and ends July 28, 2016. This Agreement may be renewed for up to four (4) additional summer periods, upon written agreement of the Director of Parks and Recreation and the District Superintendent. 2. Services to be provided. District shall review and consider requests to provide its District school buses (including ADA accessible school buses) and District -employed school bus drivers as needed by the City for transportation for City Summer Program field trip activities. Transportation requests will be considered on a trip by trip basis dependent on the availability of buses and staff. 3. Consideration. For summer 2016, the City shall pay the District $2.00 per mile for each mile traveled from the District's bus barn to the activity site and back to the District's bus barn. In addition, the City agrees to pay $20 per hour per bus driver. In future summer extension periods, the price may be increased by up to ten (10) percent upon agreement of the Director of Parks and Recreation and the District Superintendent. District agrees to provide the City with at least 90 days advance written notice of any increases. This payment shall be full compensation to the District for the costs of the school buses, the fuel to run the buses, all maintenance costs for the buses, fleet liability insurance, salary for the bus drivers, and all other related costs and expenses to the District. 4. Billing. The District shall bill the City on a monthly basis. City shall pay the bill within two Fridays after receipt of the bill out of current City revenue. 5. District Bus Maintenance. The District will maintain its buses at its bus 1 maintenance facility during the term of this Agreement as a part of the consideration. 6. District Bus Drivers. The school bus drivers assigned by the District to provide services under this Agreement shall be District employees for all purposes. The school bus drivers are not City employees for any purpose. 7. Coordination. The City's Director of Park and Recreation, or designee, shalt place a weekly order with the representative from District, or their designee, for the number of buses needed, the sites at which the buses are needed, the address of the activity to be undertaken from each site, the time at which the buses must arrive at each site to pick up the various program participants, and the time at which the buses must arrive at each activity site to pick up the various program participants to return them to their respective sites. Transportation requests will be placed no later than seven days prior to date of departure. 8. Governmental Service. This Agreement is between the City and the District for the purpose of providing transportation between the various Summer Program, and youth recreation program sites and activity sites. 9. Insurance. District agrees to provide following insurance and name City as additional Insured: vehicle liability coverage in limits provided by Texas Tort Claims Act for District of $100,000 per person, $300,000 per occurrence, and $100,000 per occurrence of property damage. District also agrees to provide worker's compensation coverage as required by law. In the alternative if District is self insured, District may provide City Director of Parks and Recreation with a letter confirming self insurance coverage in accordance with applicable law. 10. Current Revenue. All money spent for transportation for the Summer Program, and youth recreation program participants through this Agreement must be spent out of currently available revenue of the City and the District. 11. Effective Date and Entirety Clause. This Agreement takes effect on date of last signature. This Agreement expresses the entire agreement between the parties. Any modification, amendment. or addition to this Agreement Is not binding upon the parties unless in writing and signed by persons authorized to make such agreements on behalf of the respective party. EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE on the day of 2016. ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta Ronald L. Olson City Secretary City Manager Approved as to legal form A By: �°.. Lisa Aguilar, Assistait Attorney tlorney for City Attorney 2 COPRUS CHRISTI INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT By: !fit Roland Hernandez, Ph.D. Superintendent ' I Date: By: Arnulfo Gonzal Purchasing and distribution Date: _?/_,p By: #T-41_ ------ — John J. Janssen Counsel for CCESD Date: ei -1 - Zaltp INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND FLOUR BLUFF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR MULTI-YEAR SUMMER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES This agreement (Agreement) is entered into between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home rule municipal corporation (City), and the Flour Bluff Independent School District (District) for purposes of the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Texas Government Code, Chapter 791, as amended, to achieve efficiency in meeting intergovernmental responsibilities. WHEREAS, the City is sponsoring a summer recreational program for elementary school age children using several of Corpus Christi Independent School District's school campuses, a Ca!alien Independent School District campus, a Flour Bluff Independent School District school campus, as well as a youth recreation program during the term of this Agreement for school age children, (hereinafter, collectively referred to as the Summer Program); WHEREAS, the City includes travel to various activity sites around the Corpus Christi area as field trips for its Summer Program participants; and WHEREAS, the District agrees to consider requests to provide to the City a sufficient number of District owned school buses, including school buses accessible as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), for a fixed fee per mile as stated herein to transport the Summer Program participants from their respective campuses to the various activity sites. NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the District, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, agree as follows: 1. Term. For summer 2016, this Agreement begins June 20, 2016 and ends July 28, 2016. This Agreement may be renewed for up to four (4) additional summer periods, upon written agreement of the Director of Parks and Recreation and the District Superintendent. 2. Services to be provided. District shall review and consider requests to provide its District school buses (including ADA accessible school buses) and District -employed school bus drivers as needed by the City for transportation for City Summer Program field trip activities. Transportation requests will be considered on a trip by trip basis dependent on the availability of buses and staff. 3. Consideration. For summer 2016, the City shall pay the District $3.99 per mile for each mile traveled from the District's campus to the activity site and back to the District's campus. In future summer extension periods, the price may be increased by up to ten (10) percent upon agreement of the Director of Parks and Recreation and the District Superintendent. District agrees to provide the City with at least 90 days advance written notice of any increases. This payment shall be full compensation to the District for the costs of the school buses, the fuel to run the buses, all maintenance costs for the buses, fleet liability insurance, salary for the bus drivers, and all other related costs and expenses to the District. 4. Billing. The District shall bill the City on a monthly basis. City shall pay the bill within two Fridays after receipt of the bill out of current City revenue. 5. District Bus Maintenance. The District will maintain its buses at its bus 1 maintenance facility during the term of this Agreement as a part of the consideration. 6. District Bus Drivers. The school bus drivers assigned by the District to provide services under this Agreement shall be District employees for all purposes. The school bus drivers are not City employees for any purpose. 7. Coordination. The City's Director of Park and Recreation, or designee, shall place a weekly order with the representative from District, or their designee, for the number of buses needed, the sites at which the buses are needed, the address of the activity to be undertaken from each site, the time at which the buses must arrive at each site to pick up the various program participants, and the time at which the buses must arrive at each activity site to pick up the various program participants to return them to their respective sites. Transportation requests will be placed no later than seven days prior to date of departure. 8. Governmental Service. This Agreement is between the City and the District for the purpose of providing transportation between the various Summer Program, and youth recreation program sites and activity sites. 9. Insurance. District agrees to provide following insurance and name City as additional insured: vehicle liability coverage in limits provided by Texas Tort Claims Act for District of $100,000 per person, $300,000 per occurrence, and $100,000 per occurrence of property damage. District also agrees to provide worker's compensation coverage as required by law. In the alternative if District is self insured, District may provide City Director of Parks and Recreation with a letter confirming self insurance coverage in accordance with applicable law. 10. Current Revenue. All money spent for transportation for the Summer Program. and youth recreation program participants through this Agreement must be spent out of currently available revenue of the City and the District. 11. Effective Date and Entirety Clause. This Agreement takes effect on date of last signature. This Agreement expresses the entire agreement between the parties. Any modification, amendment, or addition to this Agreement is not binding upon the parties unless in writing and signed by persons authorized to make such agreements on behalf of the respective party. EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE on the day of , 2016. ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta Ronald L. Olson City Secretary City Manager Approved as to legal formhAprill? , 2016. By: ,44.4 Lisa Aguilar, Assi City Attorney for City Attorney FLOUR BLUFF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT By: �,.. Clayton Pocius, Transportation Director Date: Li 1/00 3 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 17, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 DATE: April 21, 2016 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Stacie Talbert Anaya, Interim Director, Parks and Recreation Department StacieT@cctexas.com 361-826-3464 Texas General Land Office Beach Cleaning and Maintenance Assistance Program CAPTION: Resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to request continued financial assistance for beach cleaning and maintenance on North Padre Island and Mustang Island during FY 2016-2017 under the Texas General Land Office's Beach Cleaning and Maintenance Assistance Program. PURPOSE: The Beach Cleaning and Maintenance Assistance Program provides reimbursement for some portion of the City of Corpus Christi's beach maintenance expenditures. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The Texas General Land Office (TGLO) Beach Cleaning and Maintenance Assistance Program uses a funding formula to reimburse cities and counties. The reimbursement amount varies from year to year based on the formula and available funds. Currently, the principal portion of the beach maintenance appropriations is distributed among the twelve communities that contain public beaches within their jurisdiction and have made application for funding. For FY14 and FY15, the City received $75,769.64 and $63,160.35 respectively. FY16 funds have yet to be distributed but are estimated to be approximately $64,000.00. ALTERNATIVES: Do not apply for beach maintenance funding. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Cities which qualify for eligibility under the Natural Resources Code, may receive up to, but no greater than two-thirds reimbursement for eligible expenses incurred in cleaning and maintaining the beaches; however, actual state appropriations have always limited this reimbursement to the range of 10 to 20 percent of actual local costs. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The City Council must pass a resolution to apply for the Texas General Land Office program. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal, Finance FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating X Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015- 2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $ 64,000 $ 64,000 Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE $64,000 $64,000 FUND(S): General Fund 1020 Comments: The estimated revenue for this reimbursement program will be submitted in the FY16-17 proposed budget. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve this resolution. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to request continued financial assistance for beach cleaning and maintenance on North Padre Island and Mustang Island during FY 2016-2017 under the Texas General Land Office's Beach Cleaning and Maintenance Assistance Program. Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas: SECTION 1. The City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute all documents necessary to apply for continued financial assistance for cleaning and maintaining beaches under the City's jurisdiction on North Padre Island and Mustang Island during FY 2016-2017 under the Texas General Land Office's Beach Cleaning and Maintenance Assistance Program. SECTION 2. This Resolution shall take effect and be in full force immediately after its adoption by the City Council. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas of , 2016 The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Michael Hunter Rudy Garza Colleen McIntyre Chad McIntyre Brian Rosas Lucy Rubio Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughn AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 17, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 DATE: TO: May 12, 2016 Ronald L. Olson, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, P.E., Assistant City Manager MarkVV@cctexas.com (361) 826-3082 FROM: Valerie H. Gray, P.E., Executive Director, Public Works ValerieG@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 J. H. Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Stacie Talbert-Anaya, Interim Director Parks & Recreation StacieT@cctexas.com (361) 826-3476 Execute Construction Contract Community Park Development and Improvements - Parker Park (Bond 2012) CAPTION: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Ram-Bro Construction of Robstown, Texas in the amount of $363,559.50 for the Community Park Development and Improvements - Parker Park project for the base bid only for improvements to the existing park. (Bond 2012, Proposition 4). PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is to execute a Construction Contract with Ram-Bro Construction of Robstown, Texas for the Community Park Development and Improvement - Parker Park (Bond 2012) project. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: This project is part of Bond 2012 Proposition 4 — City-wide Community Parks development and improvements which includes West Guth, Bill Witt/Oso Creek, Hector P Garcia/Salinas, Billish and Parker Parks as well as downtown squares La Retama and Artesian Parks. Bond 2012 Brochure Language: "This project will primarily focus on irrigation upgrades and extensions at West Guth, Bill Witt/Oso Creek, Hector P. Garcia/Salinas, Billish, and Parker Parks as well as downtown squares La Retama and Artesian Parks. Additionally, improvements may include dog parks, skate parks and splash pads, shade structures, landscaping, trails, parking improvements and other items." Parker Park is a Community Park located at the intersection of Waldron and Graham Roads. Project includes a base bid and three additive alternate features. Base Bid: • Removal of 2.2 acres of existing vegetation within an existing perimeter walking path • Installation of a new irrigation system, new top soil, and new Bermuda grass, native low water demand plants and decomposed granite paths within the 2.2 acre area • Repairs of the existing perimeter walking path • Removal of existing play equipment in anticipation of the installation of new equipment. The new equipment will be purchased and installed as a separate contract. • Installation of two new concrete pads for new play areas and safety surfacing for both the new playground areas and the existing playground to be re -used • Lighting for playgrounds and the existing basketball courts • Demolition of the existing timber pavilion roof frame and the installation of a new galvanized steel framing members with wood decking and composition shingles (Texas Department of Insurance [TDI] compliant) Additive alternates were identified that could be executed if funds were available include: 1) Additional landscaping in the areas around the playgrounds. 2) New shade structure between the playgrounds. 3) Replace the existing concrete walkway around the site. On April 6, 2016 the City received proposals from five (5) bidders and the bids are as follows: Contractor Base Bid Add. Alt. One Add Alt. Two Add Alt. Three Total Base Bid + Add Alts One, Two and Three Ram-Bro Contracting, Inc. Robstown, Texas $363,559.50 $85,855.00 $80,000.00 $54,550.00 $583,964.50 Gourley Contractors, LLC. Corpus Christi, Texas $440,815.00 $15,000.00 $30,000.00 $27,275.00 $513,090.00 JE Construction Services, LLC. Corpus Christi, Texas $534,673.96 $35,443.30 $53,808.11 $43,640.00 $667,565.37 Alpha Building Corp. Harlingen, Texas $562,610.89 $36,360.00 $24,700.00 $81,497.70 $705,168.59 Barcom Construction, Inc. Corpus Christi, Texas $660,026.12 $42,193.00 $36,204.00 $73,860.70 $812,283.82 Note: The Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC) was $354,078. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Execute the Construction Contract for the Base Bid with Ram-Bro Contracting, Inc. as proposed. (Recommended). 2. Do not execute the Construction Contract for the Base Bid with Ram-Bro Contracting, Inc. as proposed. (Not Recommended). OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: The designer of this project is CLK Architects and Associates. The Parks & Recreation Department will use the balance of the project budget and community enrichment funds to purchase and install the playground and fitness equipment in the park. The cost of these items is approximately $165,000. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Conforms to statutes regarding Request for Bids process; FY 2015-2016 Capital Budget. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Parks and Recreation FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue X Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Prior Project Budget and Expenditures Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $5,000,000.00 $0.00 $5,000,000.00 Encumbered/Expended Amount 113,032.00 113,032.00 This item $363,559.50 $363,559.50 Future Anticipated Expenditures This Project 54,489.00 54,489.00 BALANCE $4,886,968.00 ($531,080.50) $4,468,919.50 Fund(s): Parks and Recreation Bond 2012 Comments: The Construction Contract will result in the expenditure of an amount not to exceed $363,559.50 and the project is estimated to be complete in six months from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed. RECOMMENDATION: City Staff recommends the approval of the Construction Contract for the base bid with Ram-Bro Construction of Robstown, Texas in the amount of $363,559.50 for the Community Park Development and Improvement - Parker Park (Bond 2012) project for the base bid only. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Project Budget Location Map Presentation Form 1295 PROJECT BUDGET Community Park Development and Improvements Parker Park BOND 2012 FUNDS AVAILABLE: Parks and Recreation Bond 2012 CIP $5,000,000.00 TOTAL $5,000,000.00 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction: Construction (Ram-Bro ) THIS ITEM 363,559.50 Construction Contingency (10%) 36,355.00 Construction Inspection & Testing: Construction Inspection (Estimate) 3% 7,270.00 Construction Phase - Materials Testing Services (Rock Engineering) 4,364.00 Design: Design Architect (CLK Architects) 63,940.00 Reimbursements: Total Reimbursements 6,500.00 Contract Administration (Engineering Svcs Admin/Capital Budget/Finance) 5,000.00 Engineering Services (Project Mgt/Constr Mgt) 1,000.00 Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 500.00 Other: Total Other 49,092.00 Staff Augmentation 48,542.00 Arrow Display Signs 550.00 TOTAL 531,080.50 * ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE $4,468,919.50 * Remaining balance is reserved for remaining community parks Flour Bluff Matlack St ‘11 z Jester St tak4de Dr South Padre Island Drive. O'Neill St Grham Rd merstan r Don Perko Rd 411.,)tlm Rd Graham Rd. Project Location Don Rd Glemak Dr HtThn 1-tothet Or er'w VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Glertok Df 3LICIVIN VNI-10V7 •tr! Project Number: E14005 Community Park Development and Improvements - Parker Park Bond 2012 CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Corpus Chr sti Engineering Services Community Park Development and Improvements Bond Issue 2012, Proposition 4 — Parker Park Council Presentation May 17, 2016 Location Map Corpus Chr sti Engineering Services 2 Vicinity Map Corpus Chr sti Engineering Services Project Location drop if dy'g 3 Project Scope Corpus Chr sti Engineering Services This project includes: New irrigation system, new top soil, new Bermuda grass, and native low water demand plants and decomposed granite paths Repairs of the existing perimeter walking path Removal of existing play equipment in anticipation of the installation of new equipment. The new equipment will be purchased and installed as a separate contract. Two new concrete pads for new play areas and safety surfacing Lighting for playgrounds and the existing basketball courts Repairs to the existing pavilion roof 4 Project Schedule Corpus Chr sti Engineering Services 2016 Bid / Award Construction Projected Schedule reflects City Council award of Parker Park construction in May 2016 with anticipated construction completion in November 2016. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-48382 Date Filed: 05/02/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. RAM-BRO Contracting, Inc. Robstown, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods or other property to be provided under the contract. E14005 Sitework 4 Name of interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. El 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. ",,,, KATHLEEN ELIZABETH RAMON \\R•P f a°:* Notary Public, Slate of Texas[-' My Commission Expires r �"*—v /� %;::4> January 23, 2017 Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity AFFI Sworn NOTARY STAMP SEAL_ ABOVE t and subscribed before me, by the said l‹. k e r":\i'cto 'VlYuio ✓` , this the 3 a day of i ei 20 i f9 , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. v Signature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 17, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 DATE: April 29, 2016 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, P.E., Assistant City Manager MarkVV@cctexas.com (361) 826-3082 Valerie H. Gray, P.E., Executive Director, Public Works ValerieG@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: Dan Grimsbo, Interim Director of Water and Utilities DanG@cctexas.com (361) 826-1718 Jeffrey H. Edmonds, P.E., Director, Engineering Services JeffreyE@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Engineering Design Contract O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase I CAPTION: Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an Engineering Design contract with LNV, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $95,467 for the O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase I for design, bid and construction phase services. PURPOSE: The purpose of this agenda item is to obtain authority to execute an engineering design contract needed for the O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase I. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Sludge accumulation at the ONSWTP has been an on ongoing concern. The last dredging project was completed in 2000. Since then, various studies have been conducted to formulate a long-range sludge management strategy. This project will address immediate sludge removal needs while staff develops a more permanent sludge handling solution. Alum sludge is a by-product of the water treatment process. The sludge is then processed/stored in the lagoons to settle. Currently Lagoons 5 & 6 are the primary designated location to process sludge. Lagoon 7 was planned for additional capacity however Lagoon 7 is reaching critical sludge accumulation levels & is essential to plant operations. This proposed project will provide an intermediate solution for sludge management for ONSWTP. The ongoing evaluation and design determined that the sludge storage levels in Lagoon 7 could impact plant operations if not addressed. The focus of the proposed project is to ensure sludge accumulation does not affect the operations at ONSWTP while a more permanent solution is formulated. Once this project is underway the following steps will be taken towards implementation of the more permanent solution: • Enter into a design contract for Lagoon 8, a new solids handling lagoon, to be built adjacent to the existing pollywog ponds on the Northside of Highway 37. • Dredge Lagoon 7, the North and South Lagoons, and the Pre -Sedimentation, and place dredge material in Lagoon 8. • Install dredging equipment that will provide for continuous dredging of the North and South lagoon. • Implement a dredging maintenance schedule to dredge the basins as needed to prevent overfilling. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the execution of the engineering design contract. 2. Do not authorize the execution of the engineering design contract. (Not Recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Conforms to City Fiscal Policy EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Utilities Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ®Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $112,000.00 $1,388,000.00 $1,500,000.00 Encumbered / Expended Amount This Item $95,467.00 $95,467.00 Future Anticipated Expenditures This Project $16,533.00 $1,382,904.00 $1,399,437.00 BALANCE $0.00 $5,096.00 $5,096.00 Fund(s): Water CIP No. 8 Comments: This project requires approximately 458 calendar days with anticipated completion in August 2017. The contract will result in the expenditure of an amount not to exceed $95,467. RECOMMENDATION: City Staff recommends approval of the Engineering Design contract with LNV, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $95,467 for the O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase I for design, bid and construction phase services. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Project Budget Location Map Contract Presentation Form 1295 PROJECT BUDGET O.N. STEVENS WATER TREATMENT PLANT INTERMEDIATE SLUDGE REMOVAL PHASE 1 FUNDS AVAILABLE: Water CIP 112,000 Future Water CIP 1,388,000 TOTAL 1,500,000 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction: Construction Estimate 1,144,943 Contingencies (10%) 114,494 Construction Observation Estimate 52,500 Engineering and Testing: Engineering Design (LNV, Inc.) THIS ITEM 95,467 Testing Estimate 30,000 Reimbursements: Administration/Finance (Engineering/Capital Budget/Finance) 22,500 Engineering Services (Project Management) 30,000 Misc 5,000 TOTAL $1,494,904 PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE $5,096 0 CALALLEN.. CA LAIL GJ foca 5'j e C?.r'!e- q 14A up give/ E� 1 Project Location O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant VICI IMAP NOT TO SCALE 62. Project Number: E16246 O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase I CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT 64Ali DEPARTMENT CORPUS CHRISTI, ���Es CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN The City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home rule municipal corporation, P.O. Box 9277, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas 78469-9277 (City) acting through its duly authorized City Manager or Designee (Director of Engineering Services) and LNV, Inc., a Texas corporation, 801 Navigation, Suite 300, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas 78408, (Consultant), hereby agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF PROJECT O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase 1 (Project No. E16246) - This project will provide the City with Basic and Additional Services for the design and development of bid documents for the improvements necessary for the recommended sludge removal option identified in the ELR for Amendment No. 1 to O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant (ONSWTP) Interim Sludge Management Improvements (E13052). The recommended option generally consists of dredging Lagoon No. 7 and pumping the dredged material into geotextile tubes for dewatering. The geotextile tubes will be pre -staged in a newly constructed dewatering cell adjacent to Lagoon No. 7. The geotextile tubes will be allowed to remain on site, awaiting disposal, fora maximum of two (2) years, per Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) requirements. The final disposal solution for the geotextile tubes and dewatered sludge is yet to be determined by the City. This project will remove the maximum quantity of sludge from the lagoons allowable within specific program budget constraints and will provide ONSWTP with a solution to restore a portion of the sludge storage capacity at ONSWTP and particularly in Lagoon No. 7 (Washwater Return Basin). 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES The Consultant hereby agrees to perform services to complete the Project, as detailed in Exhibit "A". In addition, Consultant will provide monthly status updates (project progress or delays presented with monthly invoices) and provide contract administration services, as described in Exhibit "A", to complete the Project. Work will not begin on Additional Services until requested by the Consultant (provide breakdown of costs, schedules), and written authorization is provided by the Director of Engineering Services. 3. ORDER OF SERVICES The Consultant agrees to begin work on those authorized Basic Services for this contract upon receipt of the Notice to Proceed from the Director of Engineering Services. Work will not begin on any phase or any Additional Services until requested in writing by the Consultant and written authorization is provided by the Director of Engineering Services. The anticipated schedule of the preliminary phase, design phase, bid phase, and construction phase is shown on Exhibit "A". This schedule is not to be inclusive of all additional time that may be required for review by the City staff and may be amended by or with the concurrence of the Director of Engineering Services. The Director of Engineering Services may direct the Consultant to undertake additional services or tasks provided that no increase in fee is required. Services or tasks requiring K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\JENNIFER\WATER\E16246 ONSWTP INTERMEDIATE SLUDGE REMOVAL\CONTRACT\CONTRACT.DOC Page 1 of 5 an increase of fee will be mutually agreed and evidenced in writing as an amendment to this contract. Consultant shall notify the City of Corpus Christi within three (3) days of notice if tasks requested requires an additional fee. 4. FEE The City will pay the Consultant a fee as described in Exhibit "A" for providing services authorized, a total fee not to exceed $95,467.00. Monthly invoices will be submitted in accordance with Exhibit "B". 5. INDEMNITY Consultant shall fully indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi and its officials, officers, agents, employees, or other entity, excluding the engineer or architect or that person's agent, employee or subconsultant, over which the City exercises control ("Indemnitee") from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, to the extent that the damage is caused by or results from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property infringement or failure to pay a subcontractor or supplier committed by Consultant or its agent, Consultant under contract or another entity over which Consultant exercises control while in the exercise of rights or performance of the duties under this agreement. This indemnification does not apply to any liability resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the City or its employees, to the extent of such negligence. Consultant shall defend Indemnitee, with counsel satisfactory to the City Attorney, from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, if the claim is not based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee. If a claim is based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee, the Consultant shall reimburse the City's reasonable attorney's fees in proportion to the Consultant's liability. Consultant must advise City in writing within 24 hours of any claim or demand against City or Consultant known to Consultant related to or arising out of Consultant's activities under this Agreement. 6. INSURANCE Consultant agrees to comply with the insurance requirements in Exhibit "C". 7. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT The City may terminate this contract for convenience upon seven days written notice to the Consultant at the address of record. The City may terminate this agreement for cause upon ten days written notice to the Consultant. If Consultant begins, within three days of receipt of such notice, to correct its failure and proceeds to diligently cure such failure within the ten days, the agreement will not terminate. K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\JENNIFER\WATER\E16246 ONSWTP INTERMEDIATE SLUDGE REMOVAL\CONTRACT\CONTRACT.DOC Page 2 of 5 In the event of termination, the Consultant will be compensated for its services on all stages authorized based upon Consultant and City's estimate of the proportion of the total services actually completed at the time of termination. 8. LOCAL PARTICIPATION The City Council's stated policy is that City expenditures on contracts for professional services be of maximum benefit to the local economy. 9. ASSIGNABILITY The Consultant will not assign, transfer or delegate any of its obligations or duties in this contract to any other person without the prior written consent of the City, except for routine duties delegated to personnel of the Consultant staff. If the Consultant is a partnership, then in the event of the termination of the partnership, this contract will inure to the individual benefit of such partner or partners as the City may designate. No part of the Consultant fee may be assigned in advance of receipt by the Consultant without written consent of the City. The City will not pay the fees of expert or technical assistance and consultants unless such employment, including the rate of compensation, has been approved in writing by the City. 10.OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS All documents including contract documents (plans and specifications), record drawings, contractor's field data, inspection reports and submittal data will be the sole property of the City, may not be used again by the Consultant without the express written consent of the Director of Engineering Services. However, the Consultant may use standard details that are not specific to this project. The City agrees that any modification of the plans will be evidenced on the plans, and be signed and sealed by a professional engineer prior to re -use of modified plans. 11.STANDARD OF CARE Services provided by Consultant under this Agreement shall be performed with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by competent engineers or architects practicing in the same or similar locality and under the same or similar circumstances and professional license; and performed as expeditiously as is prudent considering the ordinary professional skill and care of a competent engineer or architect. 12. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Consultant agrees to comply with City of Corpus Christi Ordinance No. 17112 and complete the Disclosure of Interests form as part of this contract. 13. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES For contracts that exceed $50,000, Consultant agrees to comply with Texas Government Code section 2252.908 and complete Form 1295 Certificate of Interested Parties as part of this agreement. K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\JENNIFER\WATER\E16246 ONSWTP INTERMEDIATE SLUDGE REMOVAL\CONTRACT\CONTRACT.DOC Page 3 of 5 Form 1295 requires disclosure of "interested parties" with respect to entities that enter contracts with cities. These interested parties include: (1) persons with a "controlling interest" in the entity, which includes: a. an ownership interest or participating interest in a business entity by virtue of units, percentage, shares, stock or otherwise that exceeds 10 percent; b. membership on the board of directors or other governing body of a business entity of which the board or other governing body is composed of not more than 10 members; or c. service as an officer of a business entity that has four or fewer officers, or service as one of the four officers most highly compensated by a business entity that has more than four officers. (2) a person who actively participates in facilitating a contract or negotiating the terms of a contract with a governmental entity or state agency, including a broker, intermediary, adviser or attorney for the business entity. Form 1295 must be electronically filed with the Texas Ethics Commission at https://www.ethics.state.tx.us/whatsnew/elf info form1295.htm. The form must then be printed, signed, notarized and filed with the City. For more information, please review the Texas Ethics Commission Rules at https://www.ethics.state.tx.us/legal/ch46.html. 14. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Consultant agrees to comply with Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Government Code and file Form CIQ with the City Secretary's Office, if required. For more information and to determine if you need to file a Form CIQ, please review the information on the City Secretary's website at http://www.cctexas.com/government/city-secretary/conflict- disclosure/index. 15. ENTIRE AGREEMENT AND CONTROLLING LAW This Agreement represents the entire and integrated Agreement between City and Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either oral or written. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both the City and Consultant. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Texas without regard to its conflicts of laws. Venue for legal proceedings lies exclusively in Nueces County, Texas. 16. CONFLICT RESOLUTION BETWEEN DOCUMENTS Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges if anything contained in the Consultant - prepared Exhibit "A", Consultant's Scope of Services, or contained in any other document prepared by Consultant and included herein, is in conflict with this Agreement, this Agreement shall take precedence and control to resolve said conflict. K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\JENNIFER\WATER\E16246 ONSWTP INTERMEDIATE SLUDGE REMOVAL\CONTRACT\CONTRACT.DOC Page 4 of 5 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI LNV, I74. J.H. Edmonds, P.E. Date Dan =y= /-cker, P.E. Date Director of Engineering Services Preside 801 ' avigation, Suite 300 Corpus Christi, Texas 78408 (361) 883-1984 Office (361) 883-1986 Fax RECOMMENDED Operating Department Date APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Legal Department APPROVED Office of Management and Budget ATTEST Date Date Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Date Project Name O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase 1 Project Number E16246 Accounting Unit 4093-041 Account 550950 Activity El 6246014093EXP Account Category 50950 Fund Name Water CIP MENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGELIENNIFERIWATER1E16246 ONSWTP INTERMEDIATE SLUDGE REMOVALICONTRACTICONTRACT.00C Page 5 of 5 EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS O.N. STEVENS WATER TREATMENT PLANT INTERMEDIATE SLUDGE REMOVAL PHASE 1 PROJECT NO. E16246 I. SCOPE OF SERVICES A. BASIC SERVICES For the purpose of this contract, Preliminary Phase may include Schematic Design and Design Phase services may include Design Development as applicable to Architectural services. 1. Preliminary Phase. The Architect/Engineer A/E (also referred to as Consultant) will: a) Prcparc PowcrPoint prcscntation in City format for City Council Meeting. -- • c) d) meetings to attendees within five working days of the meeting. Prepare geotechnical investigation findings (see additional services). Request available reports, record drawings, utility maps and other information provided by the City pertaining to the project area. upgrades. Coordinate with the City's Project Manager and identify operating depa e s potentia ejeGt-1 eels. f) Develop preliminary street cross section recommendations. Prepare conceptual life cycle cost estimate with recommended pavement sections using Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Real Cost Program. map. Prepare preliminary opinions of probablc construction coctc for thc recommended improvements. Develop drainage area boundary map for existing an€1-p-r-e-iaesed drainage areas served. Conduct the hydraulic analysis to quantify the storm sewer design of existing and proposed systems. Include the analysis of inlet capacity. Identify electric and communication utility companics and privatc pipclinc companies that may havc cxisting facilitics and must rclocatcd to accommodatc the proposed improvements. Coordinate with AEP and City Traffic Engineering to identify location of electrical power conduit for street lighting and traffic signalization. Identify and analyze requirements of governmental authorities ham-j-u-risdiction to approve design of the Project including permitting, environmental, historical, construction, and gcotcchnical issucs; upon rcqucst or concurrcncc of thc TDLR, etc. n) Identify and recommend public outreach and community stakeholder requirements. o) Review City provided preliminary Traffic impact asccscment and providc recommendation for integration and/or additional requirements as appropriate. EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 10 Revised November 26, 2013 p) q) r) s) t) u) Prepare an Engineering Letter Report (20 25 page main body text document required per City Plan Preparation Standards Contract Format (CPPSCF).Engineering Letter Report to include: 1. Provide a concise presentation of pertinent factors, sketches, designs, cross sections, and parameters which will or may impact the design, including sequencing, alignment, cross section, geotechnical testing report, right of way requirements, conformance to master plans, identification of needed additional serviccs, identification of needed permits and environmental consideration, existing and proposed utilities, identification of quality and quantity of materials of construction, and other factors required for a professional -design. 3. Include existing site photos. /1. Provide opinion of probable construction costs. jurisdiction to approve design of the Project including permitting, City agent or with City participation and coordinate with agcncics such as TCEQ RTA, CDBG, USPS, CCISD, community groups, TDLR, etc. 6. Provide an analysis on project impacts towards "re engineering" and affect. 7. Provide anticipated index of drawings and specifications. 8. Provide a summary table & required ROW parcels Submit one (1) copy in an approved electronic format, and one (1) paper copy of the Draft Engineering Letter Report. Submit computer model file, results and calcula4e-Rs used to analyze drainage. Conduct Project review meeting with City staff to review and receive City - - . Manager. Assimilate all City review comments of the Draft Engineering Letter Report and provide one (1) set of the Final Engineering Letter Report (ELR) (electronic and hard copics using City Standards as applicable) suitable for reproduction. Assist City in presenting summary of EL R findings to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Subcommittee and the Transportation Advisory Committcc (TAC). Prcparc - --- an-GI-response to comments. City staff will provide one set only of the following information (as applicable): b) Requested record dramas, record information in cicctronic format as available from City Engineering files. b) The preliminary budget, specifying the funds available for construction. c) A copy of existing studies and plans. (as available from City Engineering files). d) Field location of existing city utilities. (A/E to coordinate with City Operating Department) EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 10 Revised November 26, 2013 c) Applicablc Mastcr Plans and GIS mapping are available on the City's website. f) City Control survey Bench marks and coordinates. g) Preliminary Traffic impact assessment. The records provided for A/E's use under this contract are proprietary, copyrighted, and authorized for use only by A/E, and only for the intended purpose of this project. Anv unauthorized use or distribution of the records provided under this contract is strictly prohibited. 2. Design Phase. Upon approval of the preliminary phase, designated by receiving authorization to proceed, the A/E will: a) Provide coordination with electric and communication utility companies and private pipeline companies that may have existing facilities and must relocated to accommodate the proposed improvements. materials and/or contaminated soils that may be discovered during construction (to be included under additional services). c) Prepare construction documents in City standard format for the work identified- the approved ELR. Construction plans to include improvements or modifications to the storm water, water and wastewater systems within the project limits. Include standard City of Corpus Christi detail sheets as appropriate. d) Prepare construction plans in compliance with CPPSCF using English units on 11"x 17". 1. Prepare Traffic Control and Construction Sequencing Plans. The TCP will include construction sequencing, typical cross section and construction phasing plan sheets, warning and barricades, as well as standards sheets for barricades, traffic control plan, work zone pavement markings and signage. 2. Provide Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, including construction drawings. e) Furnish one (1) set of the interim plans (60% submittal - electronic and hard copies using City Standards as applicable) to the City staff for review and approval purposes with estimates of probable construction costs. Identify distribution list for plans and bid documents to all affected franchise utilities. 1. Required with the interim plans is a "Plan Executive Summary, project checklist & drawing checklist" which will identify and summarize the project by distinguishing key elements and opinion of probable project costs. 2. Attend 60% submittal meeting with City Staff to assist staff in review of 60% submittal. f) Hold Project 60% review meeting. Prepare meeting agenda and distribute meeting meetings to attendees within five working days of the meeting. Assimilate all review comments, as appropriate and, upon Notice to Proceed. g) Provide one (1) set of the pre final plans and bid documents (90% submittal ecution summary, project checklist and plan checklist. .so meeting meetings to attendees within five working days of the meeting. Assimilate all review comments, and incorporate any rcquircmcnts into the plans and specifications, and advise City of responding and non responding EXHIBIT "A" Page 3 of 10 Revised November 26, 2013 participants as appropriate and, upon Notice to Proceed. i) Provide one (1) set of the final (100%) plans (unsealed and unstamped - electronic and half-size hard copy using City Standards as applicable) for City's final review. j) Assimilate all final review comments Upon approval by the Director of Engineering Services, provide one (1) set of the final plans and contract documents (electronic and half-size hard copy using City Standards as applicable) suitable for reproduction. Said bid documents henceforth become the shared intellectual property of the City of Corpus Christi and the Consultant. The City agrees that any modifications of the submitted final plans (for other uses by the City) will be evidenced on the plans and be signed and sealed by a professional engineer prior to re -use of modified plans. k) Provide Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) measures to ensure that all submittals of the interim, pre -final (if required), and final complete plans and complete bid documents with specifications accurately reflect the percent completion designated and do not necessitate an excessive amount of revision and correction by City. Additional revisions or design submittals are required (and within the scope of Consultant's duties under this contract) if, in the opinion of the City Engineer or designee, Consultant has not adequately addressed City - provided review comments or provided submittals in accordance with City standards.. I) Prepare and submit Monthly Status Reports to the Project Manager no later than the last Wednesday of each month with action items developed from monthly progress and review meetings. See Exhibit "A-2" for required form. m) Provide copy of contract documents along with appropriate fee to Tcxas accc�ibility rcquircmcnts for pcdestrian improvements (as authorized by Additional Services). The City staff will: a) Designate an individual to have responsibility, authority, and control for coordinating activities for the construction contract awarded. b) Provide the budget for the Project specifying the funds available for the construction contract. c) Provide electronic copy the City's standard specifications, standard detail sheets, standard and special provisions, and forms for required bid documents. 3. Bid Phase. The A/E will: a) Prcparc draft Authorization to Advertise (ATA). b) Participate in the pre-bid conference and provide a meeting agenda for critical construction activities and elements impacted the project. c) Assist the City in solicitation of bids by identification of prospective bidders, and review of bids by solicited interests. d) Review all pre-bid questions and submissions concerning the bid documents and prepare, in the City's format, for the Engineering Services' approval, any addenda or other revisions necessary to inform contractors of approved changes prior to bidding. e) Attend bid opening, analyze bids, evaluate, prepare bid tabulation, and make recommendation concerning award of the contract. EXHIBIT "A" Page 4 of 10 Revised November 26, 2013 f) In the event the lowest responsible bidder's bid exceeds the project budget as revised by the Engineering Services in accordance with the A/E's design phase estimate required above, the Engineer will, at its expense, confer with City staff and make such revisions to the bid documents as the City staff deems necessary to re -advertise that particular portion of the Project for bids. g) Prepare Agenda Memoranda and PowerPoint presentation in City format for City Council Meeting. The City staff will: a) Arrange and pay for printing of all documents and addenda to be distributed to prospective bidders. b) Advertise the Project for bidding, maintain the list of prospective bidders, receive and process deposits for all bid documents, issue (with the assistance of the A/E) any addenda, prepare and supply bid tabulation forms, and conduct bid opening. c) Receive the Engineer's recommendation concerning bid evaluation and recommendation and prepare agenda materials for the City Council concerning bid awards. d) Prepare, review and provide copies of the contract for execution between the City and the contractor. 4. Construction Administration Phase. The A/E will perform contract administration to include the following: a) Participate in pre -construction meeting conference and provide a recommended agenda for critical construction activities and elements impacted the project. b) Review, Contractor submittals and operating and maintenance manuals for conformance to contract documents. c) Review and interpret field and laboratory tests. d) Provide interpretations and clarifications of the contract documents for the contractor and authorize required changes, which do not affect the contractor's price and are not contrary to the general interest of the City under the contract. e) Make regular visits to the site of the Project to confer with the City project inspector and contractor to observe the general progress and quality of work, and to determine, in general, if the work is being done in accordance with the contract documents. This will not be confused with the project representative observation or continuous monitoring of the progress of construction. f) Prepare change orders as authorized by the City; provide interpretations and clarifications of the plans and specifications for the contractor and authorize minor changes which do not affect the contractor's price and are not contrary to the general interest of the City under the contract. g) Review, evaluate and recommend for City consideration Contractor Value Engineering proposal. h) Attend final inspection with City staff, provide punch list items to the City's Construction Engineers for contractor completion, and provide the City with a Certificate of Completion for the project upon successful completion of the project. i) Review Contractor -provided construction "red -line" drawings. Prepare Project record drawings and provide a reproducible set and electronic file (AutoCAD r.14 or later) within two (2) months of final acceptance of the project. All drawings shall be CADD drawn using dwg format in AutoCAD, and graphics data will be in dxf format with each layer being provided in a separate file. Attribute data will be EXHIBIT "A" Page 5 of 10 Revised November 26, 2013 provided in ASCII format in tabular form. All electronic data will be compatible with the City GIS system. The City staff will: a) Prepare applications/estimates for payments to contractor. b) Conduct the final acceptance inspection with the Engineer. B. ADDITIONAL SERVICES This section defines the scope of additional services that may only be included as part of this contract if authorized by the Director of Engineering Services. A/E may not begin work on any services under this section without specific written authorization by the Director of Engineering Services. Fees for Additional Services are an allowance for potential services to be provided and will be negotiated by the Director of Engineering Services as required. The A/E shall, with written authorization by the Director of Engineering Services, perform the following:: 1. Permit Preparation. Furnish the City all engineering data and documentation necessary for all required permits. The A/E will prepare this documentation for all required signatures. The A/E will prepare and submit identified permits as applicable to the appropriate local, state, and federal authorities, including: - - - L.1 in the ar b. TxDOT utility and environmental permits, multiplc use agrccmcnts c. Wetlas Delineation and Permit d. Temporary Discharge Permit c. NPDES Pcrmit/Amcndments (including SSC, NOI NOT) f. Texas Commission of Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Permits/Amendments g. Nueces County h. Texas Historical Commission (THC) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) j. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) k. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR ) m. Texas General Land Office (TGLO) n. Other agency project specific permits 2 Right of Way (ROW) Acquisition Survey. All work must comply with Category 1 A, Condition I specifications of the Texa. Society-ef-Rrofescional Surveyors' Manual of and in conformancc with the City's Global Positioning System (GPS) control network. All work must comply with all TxDOT requirements as applicable. a) Pcrform survcys to determine apparent right of ways wid4hs. b) Research plats, ROW maps, deed, easements, and survey for fence corners, monuments, and iron pins within the existing ROW and analyze to establish cxisting apparcnt ROW. NE must obtain Preliminary Title Reports from a local title company and providc copics of the titic rcports to the City. Prcliminary Titic Report shall identify title ownership and any title encumbrances to all right of way to be acquired. c) Provide a preliminary base map containing apparent ROW, which will be used by the NE to develop the proposed alignment and its position relative to the existing EXHIBIT "A" Page 6 of 10 Revised November 26, 2013 annd-repoccd ROW. This prcliminary base malt show lot or property lines, land ownership and addresses as per appraisal district records. d) Prepare Metes and Bound Instrument with supporting exhibits as required and agrccd upon, cubccqucnt to ELR acccptancc for ROW parccls, utility accmcnts and tcmporary construction easements. 3. Topographic Survey and Parcel Descriptions All work must be tied to and conform with the City's Global Positioning System (GPS) control network and comply with Category 6, Condition I specifications of the Texas Society of Professional Surveyors' Manual of Practice for Land Surveying in the State of Texas, Ninth Edition. Include reference to a minimum of two (2) found boundary monuments from the project area. a) Establish Horizontal and Vertical Control. b) Establish both primary and secondary horizontal/vertical control. c) Set project control points for Horizontal and Vertical Control outside the limits of project construction disturbance. d) Horizontal control will be based on NAD 83 State plane coordinates (South Zone), and the data will have no adjustment factor applied — i.e. — the coordinate data will remain in grid. e) Vertical control will be based on NAVD 88. f) All control work will be established using conventional (non -GPS) methods. Perform topographic surveys to gather existing condition information. g) Locate proposed soil/pavement core holes as drilled by the City's Geotechnical Engineering Consultant. h) Obtain x, y, and z coordinates of all accessible existing sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water and gas lines as well as any other lines owned by third -parties and locate all visible utilities, wells and signs within the apparent ROW width along project limits. No utility connections will be shown. Surveying services, related to subsurface engineering (SUE) shall be provided as part of the scope of work for SUE. i) Locate improvements within the apparent ROW. j) Locate and identify trees, at least five inches in diameter within the apparent ROW. k) Generate electronic planimetric base map for use in project design. I) Set property corners and prepare right of way strip parcel map depicting all parcelc-pre{pesed for acquisition. Metes ids dcccriptions must indicatc parent tract areas based on the most accurate information available. Strip map casements within the parccls to be acquired ad'hese within adjacent parcels must be shown. m) Prepare individual signed and sealed parccl maps and Icgal dcccriptions for the required right of way acquisition for parcels and easements. A strip map showing all parccls rcquircd will be submitted along with parcel descriptions. Additional fees may be required in resolving boundary conflicts between Owners. NE shall submit parcel maps and legal descriptions prior to the 60% submittal. and disposal of hazardous materials and/or contaminated soils that may be discovered during construction. EXHIBIT "A" Page 7 of 10 Revised November 26, 2013 5. Public Involvement. Participatc in two public mcctings. Onc public mccting shall bc held after submittal of the Final Engineering Letter Report and one public meeting shall be held prior to start of project construction. Prepare notices, PowerPoint presentations, his and exhibits for meetings. Provide follow up and response to citizen comments. Revise contract drawings to addrecs citizcn commcntc, as dircctcd by thc 6. Subsurfane Utility Inyectiivation a) Providc subsurfacc utility engineering in accordance with ASCE Standard "ASCE C I, 38 02, Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data" including, but not limitcd to, hydro cxcavation. Thc proposed subsurface , t estigation will be as follows: i) Excavation The survey scope includes working with a subsurface utility cavator to perform Quality Level A invcstigation of underground utilities in specified areas through the project limit. (Quality Lovcl A involvcs thc atla-s quality Icvcl will be physically located and tied to the topographic obtained to the top of the utility. ii) Utility Location The survey scope includes locating certain utilities to Quality Level B (Quality Level B involves surveying visible above ground utility facilities, such as manholes, valve boxes, pests, etc., and correl tis information with existing utility records.) These utilities will locations. iii) Storm Water Storm water facilitics within thc projcct limits will bc located to Quality Level C. Locations will be based on the surveyed locations of accessible storm water manholes and drainage inlets. iv) Wastewater Wastewater facilities within the project limits will be located to Quality Level C. Loca4e-ns will be based on the surveyed locations of v) construction related excavation shall be located at Quality Level A. Water Water facilities within the project limits will be located to Quality Level C. C by the A/E. Thc City of Corpus Christi Gas Dcpartmcnt will providc Quality Level A. The A/E will coordinate this activity. b) Inform local franchises-w#ese utilities fall within the footprint of construction related excavation of the potential for encountering their utility lines during construction. 7. Construction Observation Services. To Be Determined. 8. Warranty Phase. Provide a maintenance guaranty inspection toward the end of the one-year period after acceptance of the Project. Note defects requiring contractor action to maintain, repair, fix, restore, patch, or replace improvement under the maintenance guaranty terms of the contract. Document the condition and prepare a report for the City EXHIBIT "A" Page 8 of 10 Revised November 26, 2013 staff of the locations and conditions requiring action, with its recommendation for the method or action to best correct defective conditions and submit to City Staff. Complete the inspection and prepare the report no later than sixty (60) days prior to the end of the maintenance guaranty period. 9. Start Up Services. Provide on-site services and verification for all start up procedures if needed and required. 10. Contractor and Invoice Coordination for Contract Renewal (TBD). Please see Exhibit A-1. Provide the services above authorized in addition to those items shown on Exhibit "A-1" Task List, which provides supplemental description to Exhibit "A". Note: The Exhibit "A-1" Task List does not supersede Exhibit "A". II. SCHEDULE Date Activity TBD A/E Contract Execution (NTP) 2 Months after NTP 60% Design Submittal 4 Months after NTP 100% Design Submittal 5 Months after NTP Final Design Submittal 6 Months after NTP Advertise for Bid 9 Months after NTP Award Construction/Service Contract 15 Months after NTP Dredging Operation Completion III. FEES A. Fee for Basic Services. The City will pay the A/E a fixed fee for providing for all "Basic Services" authorized as per the table below. The fees for Basic Services will not exceed those identified and will be full and total compensation for all services outlined in Section I.A.1-4 above, and for all expenses incurred in performing these services. The fee for this project is subject to the availability of funds. The Engineer may be directed to suspend work pending receipt and appropriation of funds. For services provided, A/E will submit monthly statements for services rendered. The statement will be based upon A/E's estimate (and with City's concurrence) of the proportion of the total services actually completed at the time of billing. City will make prompt monthly payments in response to A/E's monthly statements. B. Fee for Additional Services. For services authorized by the Director of Engineering Services under Section I.B. "Additional Services," the City will pay the A/E a not -to -exceed fee as per the table below: EXHIBIT "A" Page 9 of 10 Revised November 26, 2013 Summary of Fees EXHIBIT "A" Page 10 of 10 Revised November 26, 2013 Basic Services Fees 1 Preliminary Design Phase $0 2 Design Phase $45,105 3 Bid Phase $10,080 4 Construction Phase $32,770 Subtotal Basic Services Fees $87,955 Additional Services Fees (Allowance) 1 Permit Preparation $1,300 2 ROW Acquisition $0 3 Topographic Survey $4,092 4 Environmental Issues $0 5 Public Involvement $0 6 SUE $0 7 Construction Observation Services $0 8 Warranty Phase $2,120 9 Start -Up Services $0 10 Contractor & Invoice Coord. for Contract Renewal (TBD) $0 Sub -Total Additional Services Fees Authorized $7,512 Total Authorized Fee $95,467 EXHIBIT "A" Page 10 of 10 Revised November 26, 2013 it,City of Corpus Christi EXHIBIT "A-1" SCOPE OF WORK LIMNSolutions Today with a Vision for Tomorrow engineers architects contractors TBPE Firm No. F-366 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI O.N. STEVENS WATER TREATMENT PLANT INTERMEDIATE SLUDGE REMOVAL PHASE 1 CITY PROJECT NO. E16246 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this project is to remove the maximum quantity of sludge from the lagoons at the City of Corpus Christi's O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant (ONSWTP) allowable within specific program budget constraints. This project will provide ONSWTP with a solution to restore a portion of the sludge storage capacity at ONSWTP and particularly in Lagoon No. 7 (Washwater Return Basin). The consultant will design and develop bid documents for the improvements necessary for the recommended sludge removal option identified in the ELR for Amendment No. 1 to O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Interim Sludge Management Improvements (E13052). The recommended option generally consists of dredging Lagoon No. 7 and pumping the dredged material into geotextile tubes for dewatering. The geotextile tubes will be pre -staged in a newly constructed dewatering cell that will be designed to contain and convey permeate and stormwater runoff from the dewatering cell back to Lagoon No. 7, preventing unauthorized discharge. The geotextile tubes will be allowed to remain on site, awaiting disposal, for a maximum of two (2) years, per TCEQ requirements. The final disposal solution for the geotextile tubes and dewatered sludge is yet to be determined by the City. In addition to Design Phase services, the consultant will also provide Bid Phase and Construction Administration services. The scope of work is further detailed in the following sections. I. SCOPE OF SERVICES A. BASIC SERVICES 1. PRELIMINARY PHASE The Preliminary Phase for this project has been largely completed and presented in the ELR for Amendment No. 1 to O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Interim Sludge Management Improvements (E13052) and as such will not require an additional ELR. 2. DESIGN PHASE Although an additional ELR will not be required, the previous ELR was not a full 30% design and did not include plan sheets at a 30% level of completion. This portion of the design development will be completed in the Design Phase. City Proj. No. E16246 ONSWTP Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase 1 LNV Proj. No. 150625 Exhibit "A-1" Page 1 of 14 a) The Consultant will develop the appropriate construction drawings, specifications and contract documents to deliver the project improvements and services in two separate parts as described below. The intention of dividing the project elements in to two separate parts is that Part 1 will be a one time construction project to make necessary improvements to the ONSWTP site. Part 2 will be a bid package for a renewable service contract for dredging and dewatering. While both parts will be bid together for the initial contract, Part 2 will be available to be reissued for subsequent service contracts with minimal revision. (1) Part 1 — Dewatering Cell Construction Part 1 will consist of the improvements at ONSWTP required to allow sludge dewatering using geotextile tubes. (a) Dewatering Cell Design The Consultant will develop the appropriate construction drawings and specifications for a dewatering cell designed to contain the permeate from the geotextile tubes during the sludge dewatering process. The cell will be designed to collect and convey the permeate in addition to any stormwater runoff from rainfall that falls within the dewatering cell. The necessary capacity will be determined by combining anticipated dewatering flow rates and stormwater flow rates. The dewatering cell design will generally consist of the following tasks: (i) Establish Dewatering Cell Boundary The boundary will be established by conducting a topographic survey and reviewing record documents in order to identify underground utilities in the proposed area. Additionally, the size and spacing of the geotextile tubes required to dewater the desired amount of sludge will be further defined. The dewatering cell boundary will be designed to ensure adequate space for the required geotextile tubes. (ii) Select Dewatering Cell Liner Material The liner material will be selected in order to facilitate dewatering by promoting positive drainage away from the geotextile tubes. Additionally, the consultant will consider the durability of various liner material options to provide optimal operational life expectancy when subjected to heavy equipment during the removal of dewatered sludge. (iii) Develop Dewatering Cell Drainage Channel Layout The drainage channels within the dewatering cell will be designed to minimize footprint while having adequate capacity to convey peak flows and facilitate dewatering by promoting positive drainage away from the geotextile tubes. (iv) Evaluate Peak Permeate Flow Rate In order to properly size the drainage channels, the peak permeate flow rate must be calculated. This peak flow rate will account for the water pumped during dredging that is not retained in the geotextile tube as well as the water that will City Proj. No. E16246 ONSWTP Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase 1 LNV Proj. No.150625 Exhibit "A-1" Page 2 of 14 continue to permeate the tubes at flow rates that will vary with time and decreased water content in the solids. (v) Select Design Storm and Evaluate Peak Runoff The design storm will be selected based on best practices for structures of a similar nature. The design storm rainfall intensity will be used for evaluation of the peak stormwater runoff expected from the dewatering cell. (vi) Develop Dewatering Cell Containment Berm Height, Material, and Construction Requirements The consultant will consider expected permeate flow rate, stormwater flow rate, topography, in-situ material, flow velocity and various other characteristics of the dewatering cell design to select an appropriate berm height, cross section, material composition, and construction requirements. (vii) Develop Dewatering Cell Drainage Channel Cross Section(s) The Consultant will consider the drainage channel layout, expected flow rates, slopes, and allowable space within the dewatering cell to determine the required width and depth of the individual drainage channels. Additionally, the Consultant will make considerations for minimizing flow velocity and erosion potential. (b) Road Crossing & Outfall Structure Design The Consultant will develop the appropriate construction drawings and specifications for a drainage structure designed to convey peak flows from the dewatering cell to Lagoon No. 7. This conveyance structure will cross the dirt access road on the northwest side of Lagoon No. 7. The dewatering cell design will generally consist of the following tasks: (i) Establish Optimum Road Crossing Location The road crossing location will make use of the topographic survey, record documents and input from plant staff. The road crossing location will be selected to minimize conflicts with plant operations and infrastructure and to maximize drainage from the dewatering cell into Lagoon No. 7. (ii) Develop Detail for Connection of Outfall Structure to Dewatering Cell Drainage Channel(s) and Berm Penetration The consultant will design a structure similar to a culvert that will convey flows from the dewatering cell through the cell berm, under the dirt access road, and into Lagoon No. 7. The structure will consist of a transition from an open channel to a closed conduit before it crosses the containment berm. This transition will be designed to facilitate flows by reducing turbulence and obstruction while resisting erosion. The berm penetration will be designed to withstand the weight and differential settling forces possible within the berm while simultaneously maintaining the integrity of the berm, structurally and hydraulically. City Proj. No. E16246 ONSWTP Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase 1 LNV Proj. No.150625 Exhibit "A-1" Page 3 of 14 (iii) Develop Detail for Lagoon No. 7 Berm Penetration/Outfall Structure The consultant will design the Lagoon No. 7 outfall structure which will be the discharge point for all flows contained and conveyed by the dewatering cell. The consultant will design the outfall structure to preserve the structural and hydraulic integrity of the Lagoon No. 7 berm. The consultant will also design the outfall structure to minimize or eliminate erosion potential and facilitate hydraulic flow into Lagoon No. 7. (iv) Establish Minimum and Maximum Road Crossing Flow Line Elevation and Pipe Diameter. The Consultant will design the road crossing by evaluating the minimum required flow line, slope, and cross section of the conveyance structure that will provide adequate flow capacity and promote positive drainage to Lagoon No. 7. (v) Select Road Crossing Piping Material The Consultant will execute this task simultaneously with task (vi) below in order to select a material that is cost effective and will provide adequate strength to resist the expected loads within given cover parameters. (vi) Determine Anticipated Loads and Minimum Cover Requirements The consultant will evaluate the minimum cover requirements for the expected magnitude and frequency of vehicle and equipment loading in the immediate area. The minimum cover will be selected in conjunction with the material selected in task (v) above in order to maintain the structural integrity of the dirt access road and the structural and hydraulic integrity of the conveyance structure crossing the road. (2) Part 2 — Dredging and Dewatering Services Part 2 will consist of the services, materials, and equipment required to dredge and dewater sludge from Lagoon No. 7 using dredging equipment and geotextile tubes. (a) Lagoon No. 7 Dredging The consultant will develop drawings and specifications as required to establish the limits, technical requirements, and schedule allowances for the anticipated sludge removal quantities. (b) Sludge Distribution Piping The Consultant will develop drawings and specifications as required to establish the technical requirements for the anticipated sludge removal quantities and flow rates. (c) Geotextile Tubes The Consultant will develop drawings and specifications as required to establish the technical requirements for the geotextile tubes to effectively dewater sludge with considerations being given to removal rates and sludge characteristics. The City Proj. No. E16246 ONSWTP Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase 1 LNV Proj. No.150625 Exhibit "A-1" Page 4 of 14 geotextile tubes will also be appropriately designed and sized to be compatible with the dewatering cell configuration. b) 60% Design Submittal The Consultant will prepare and submit, for City comment and approval, preliminary Contract Documents. The Contract Documents will include preliminary front end documents, preliminary plan sheets, and preliminary specifications which will all be developed to a 60% level of completion. c) 100% Design Submittal The Consultant will prepare and submit, for City comment and approval, 100% Contract Documents. The 100% set of Contract Documents will be a continuation of the 60% design phase. Work will generally include addressing review comments from the 60% design, completing general and project details, completing plan sheets, and completing specifications which will all be developed to a 100% level of completion. These documents will be submitted to the City for review, comment and approval. d) Final Design Submittal The Consultant will prepare the Final Design Submittal which will consist of a final set of specifications, plan sheets, and front end documents that have addressed all comments and are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the state of Texas. The consultant will also prepare the documents for distribution to the City and bidding contractors. e) Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC). The Consultant will follow established internal QA/QC procedures in order to ensure that all submittals to the City are consistent with the level of completion expected. As part of the established internal QA/QC procedures, all submittals will be reviewed by a subject matter expert who is not involved with the project design or administration. The submittal will be reviewed for general completeness, technical accuracy, and conformance with project scope and intent. Review comments will be issued and responses will be documented for each submittal. City Proj. No. E16246 ONSWTP Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase 1 LNV Proj. No.150625 Exhibit "A-1" Page 5 of 14 3. Bid Phase This task will consist of assisting the City with conducting a Pre -Bid Conference, preparing the Pre -Bid Conference minutes, responding to bidder questions, preparing addenda, and evaluating the bids, and recommending an award to the Contractor. The City will advertise the bid and distribute the bidding documents (plans, specifications, and addenda) to the interested bidders and suppliers. a) Sampling and Bench Testing Coordination & Support During bid advertisement, the consultant will coordinate with all identified prospective bidders to allow and assist them in obtaining sludge samples from Lagoon No. 7 for analysis and bench testing. This process will allow prospective bidders to determine effectiveness of dewatering equipment and the required quantities of polymer and other dewatering aids as necessary. By determining the effectiveness and required quantities, the accuracy of the bids will be improved. b) Pre -Bid Conference Approximately 3 weeks after the notice of bids has been advertised by the City, the Consultant will assist the City in conducting a Pre -Bid Conference to review the details of the project and solicit questions regarding the Bid Documents. The Consultant will prepare a draft agenda for City review, address the review comments and finalize the agenda, and document the conference in writing within 5 working days. c) Bidding Coordination and Addenda Preparation The Consultant will answer City and Contractor questions, develop written responses in the form of Contract Addenda, provide (1) set of any required addenda for distribution to Bidders, and provide overall support to City during the bid advertisement period. The addenda will include, as needed, (1) full size and (1) half-size sets of addenda drawings for distribution by the City to interested Bidders. d) Bid Evaluation and Recommendation of Award The Consultant will tabulate and review all bids received for compliance with the requirements of the Bid Documents, including addenda. After consultation with City, the Consultant will prepare a written award recommendation based on this review and knowledge of proposed contractors' and subcontractors' past performance records. 4. Construction Administration Phase The intent of the Construction Administration Phase is to assist the City in confirming that construction of the Project is carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents and to help facilitate and enable the Work City Proj. No. E16246 ONSWTP Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase 1 LNV Proj. No.150625 Exhibit "A-1" Page 6 of 14 to progress in an efficient and cost-effective manner, while maintaining facility operations. The anticipated construction duration is 6 months. a) General Project Administration and Meetings The tasks described below as part of the General Project Administration and Meetings task are estimated to consist of one Pre Construction Meeting and five (5) Monthly Status Meetings during the construction phase. Also included are approximately twelve (12) hours per month for six (6) months of coordination, correspondence, and record keeping. These tasks are further described below. (1) As the designated Design Consultant for the project, LNV will consult with and advise the City and act as its representative during construction. The Consultant will serve as the central point of contact for the Contractor. Instructions from the City to the Contractor(s) will be issued through the Consultant, who will have authority to act on behalf of the City to the extent provided in this Scope of Work, except as otherwise provided in writing. However, The Consultant will not be responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction selected by the Contractor(s) (except as otherwise specified in the Contract Documents) or the safety precautions and programs incident to the Work of the Contractor(s). (2) The Consultant will conduct specific inspections required by governing Codes, prepare applicable documentation and records of such inspections, and certify compliance with design requirements and governing Codes, as applicable. The Consultant will accompany visiting inspectors representing public or other agencies having jurisdiction over the Project and will record and report the outcome of these inspections. (3) The Consultant will review factory test reports as required by the Contract Documents and verify that the data reported meets the requirements of the contract documents. The Consultant will review test reports, whether by the Contractor or the Design Consultant, for compliance with quality standards and will take appropriate action to obtain additional data if necessary regarding the quality of materials and work in-place. (4) The efforts of the consultant will be directed toward providing a greater degree of confidence for the City that the completed Work of the Contractor conforms to the Contract Documents. However, the Consultant will not be responsible for the failure of Contractor to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. (5) On the basis of onsite examination of materials, equipment, and workmanship, the consultant will keep the City informed of the progress of the Work, will endeavor to guard the City against defects and deficiencies in such Work, and may disapprove or reject Work failing to conform to the Contract Documents. This task will include the following items: City Proj. No. E16246 ONSWTP Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase 1 LNV Proj. No.150625 Exhibit "A-1" Page 7 of 14 (6) Conduct a pre -construction conference. At the conference, the Consultant will identify field services to be provided and discuss appropriate coordination procedures. The Consultant will prepare an agenda for the meeting and will prepare and distribute the meeting notes. (7) Provide construction administration, quality control, value engineering support and coordination: The Consultant will provide construction administration and quality control services during the course of the project to assure that the overall technical correctness of the construction phase services and that specified procedures are being followed and the Consultant's schedules are being met. The Consultant will provide coordination functions during the construction phase as follows: (a) Hold coordination meetings with the City and Contractor. (b) Coordinate with regulatory and approving agencies and utilities as required. (c) Coordinate the work of specialty sub -consultants assigned to the project. (8) Maintain and provide detailed project records and documentation during the construction phase. Project records will include correspondence, schedules, submittals, test data, project data, payments, change orders, meeting minutes, clarifications, mark-ups of drawings and specifications, Contractor daily logs and other such documentation. Daily logs will be kept to document the progress and issues associated with the Work. In particular, Contractor daily logs should include dredging progress, quantities and characteristics of sludge dredged and dewatered, moisture content of the solids at various stages of dewatering, sludge levels in the Lagoon, average sludge removal rate, and dewatering rates. Project records will be delivered to the City's representative upon completion of the construction contract. Records will be maintained at the Consultant's office. b) Review Submittals and Test Results (1) The Consultant will receive, log and distribute for review and approval the submittals, shop drawings, samples, test results, operations and maintenance manuals, and other data that Contractor is required to submit. The Consultant will distribute and file the submittals after review action has been taken. The Consultant will follow-up to verify that revisions are made and resubmitted as required and will verify that such required submittals are received and approved prior to installation or payment for the materials covered. The Consultant will also perform a review of the schedule of shop drawing submissions and schedule of values prepared by Contractor and will discuss status of the submittals at construction progress meetings. The Consultant will be responsible for completing the submittal reviews within 15 business days and for monitoring the status and timeliness of responses. City Proj. No. E16246 ONSWTP Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase 1 LNV Proj. No.150625 Exhibit "A-1" Page 8 of 14 (2) The Consultant will review and approve product data, shop drawings, samples, test results, operations and maintenance manuals, and other data that the Contractor is required to submit. However, such reviews will be conducted only for conformance with the design concept of the Project and compliance with the information given in the Contract Documents. Such review and approval or other action will not extend to means, methods, sequences, techniques or procedures of construction selected by Contractor, or to safety precautions and programs incident thereto. (3) As part of this task, the Consultant will maintain a submittal log showing dates of submittal, transmittal action to other sub -consultants, dates of return and review action. Copies of the log will be furnished to the City and the Contractor monthly. The Consultant will also evaluate the Contractor's request for substitutions. Submittal review efforts are based on a maximum of two (2) reviews per submittal and that no more than fifty percent (50%) of the total number of first submittals will require two (2) reviews. The level of effort for this task is based on receiving 4 shop drawing submittals along with various material submittals. Not included in the scope of work for this task is the witnessing of specification compliance testing at manufacturer's factories. c) Issue Interpretations and Clarifications (1) The Consultant will act as the main point of contact for interpretation of the requirements of the Contract Documents and judge of the acceptability of the work based on the requirements shown or specified. The Consultant will be responsible for responding to Requests for Information (RFI) within 5 business days and for monitoring the status and timeliness of responses. (2) As part of this task, the Consultant will maintain a RFI log showing dates of submittal, transmittal action to other sub -consultants, dates of return, and a summary of the response. Copies of the log will be furnished to the City and the Contractor monthly. The level of effort for this task is based on receiving 10 RFIs. (3) As specified in the General Conditions of the Contracts, the Consultant will interpret and issue decisions on claims of the Contractor(s) or the City relating to the acceptability of the work or the interpretation of the requirements of the Contract Documents or pertaining to the execution and progress of the work. The Consultant will also have authority, as the City's representative, to require special inspection or testing of the work. (4) The Consultant will issue interpretations and clarifications of the Contract Documents, as requested by the Contractor(s) or as deemed necessary by the Resident Engineer, to facilitate proper fabrication, construction, or installation of work. The Consultant will render interpretations or decisions in good faith and in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents (e.g., within 10 -days). City Proj. No. E16246 ONSWTP Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase 1 LNV Proj. No.150625 Exhibit "A-1" Page 9 of 14 (5) In the event of a claim or dispute by the Contractor, the Consultant will interpret the requirements of the Contract Documents and judge the acceptability of the work. The Consultant will make written recommendations to the City on all claims of the Contractor related to acceptability of the work, or the interpretation of the requirements of the Contract Documents pertaining to the execution and progress of work, or additional work as deemed necessary by the City. d) Site Visits (1) The Consultant will conduct regular visits to the site (at least two (2) per month) to familiarize themselves with the status of work, make spot checks of work -in -progress, verify conformance with the design intent, and conduct detailed coordination of construction issues. During site visits the Consultant will verify quantities and characteristics of sludge being dredged and dewatered along with moisture content of the solids at various stages of dewatering and sludge levels in the Lagoons based on Contractor daily logs in order to track and provide the data to the City monthly. A total of twelve (12) site visits are anticipated for the duration of construction. e) Change Orders (1) The Consultant will review cost and time estimates for change orders and for Contractor's claims for additional cost or compensation due to differing site conditions, force majeure, material or equipment shortages, or other causes in order to determine whether they are justified under the Contract. The Consultant will also provide an estimate of the additional Design Consultant costs (if any) that would be incurred as a result of the change order. (2) The Consultant will make recommendations to the City's Project Manager on the amount of additional compensation, credit, or time extension due to the Contractor. In addition, the Consultant will clarify matters and work to resolve discrepancies with the Contractor. (3) The Consultant will perform necessary design revisions in connection with change orders to reflect modifications requested by the City, or as required by unforeseen conditions. Limited hours for coordination of the resulting change order requests and any additional Design Consultant research and design efforts are included in this scope. (4) The Consultant will also perform necessary design revisions authorized by the City in connection with change orders to reflect modifications requested by the Contractor and will perform services in evaluating substitutions proposed by Contractor. Limited hours for coordination of the resulting change order requests and any additional Design Consultant research and design efforts are included in this scope. (5) The Consultant will consider and evaluate Contractor's suggestions for changes in the Contract Drawings or Specifications and respond as appropriate or as required by the Contract Documents. The City Proj. No. E16246 ONSWTP Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase 1 LNV Proj. No.150625 Exhibit "A-1" Page 10 of 14 Consultant will coordinate with the City and provide recommendations pertaining to the suggested design modifications. f) Substantial Completion/Final Acceptance Inspection g) (1) Following notice from the Contractor, the Consultant will conduct an inspection to determine if the Project is substantially complete in accordance with the construction documents. If the Consultant considers the work substantially complete, then the Consultant will deliver to City and the Contractor a Certificate of Substantial Completion and a list of observed items requiring completion or correction (punch list), date for completion for the punch list, and recommendation for division of responsibilities between the City and the Contractor. (2) The Consultant will conduct a final inspection to determine if the finished Work has been completed to the standard required by the Contract Documents and that Contractor has fulfilled its obligations as required. This inspection will be based on the punch list and any other functional or operational deficiencies that occur in the time period between when the punch list is generated and the Final Inspection. A final list of items to be completed or corrected in accordance with the requirements of the construction documents will be prepared and submitted to the Contractor. (3) After the Contractor has completed the work of the final punch list and upon written notice from the Contractor, the Consultant will review and determine that items on the final list have been completed or corrected and make recommendations to the City concerning acceptance and final payment. Record Drawings & O&M Manuals (1) The Consultant will prepare and deliver to the City record drawings of the constructed work both in hard copy and complete electronic files for the project in AutoCAD and PDF. Record drawing information will be obtained from redlined drawings prepared by the Contractor. (2) The Consultant will compile and review O&M Manuals prepared by the Contractor. The Consultant will request revisions as needed and deliver final O&M Manuals to the City in both PDF and hard copy formats. B. Additional Services (Allowance) 1. Permit Preparation a) This item is for tasks to be determined and is an allowance in which the Consultant will provide permitting support to the City and Contractor as needed. This will include any required submittals notifying TCEQ of the commencement of dredging and sludge storage operations or other associated documentation still to be determined. City Proj. No. E16246 ONSWTP Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase 1 LNV Proj. No.150625 Exhibit "A-1" Page 11 of 14 2. ROW Acquisition This task will not be required for this project. 3. Topographic Survey a) A detailed topographic survey of the approximately 8 acres of proposed dewatering cell area will be conducted to identify natural drainage patterns and slopes. The topographic survey will also aid the Consultant in determining the cut and fill balance for the grading plan of the proposed dewatering cell. The topographic survey will be performed in accordance with the requirements stated in Exhibit A. 4. Environmental Issucs This task will not be required for this project. 5. Public Involvement This task will not be required for this project. 6. Subsurface Utility Exploration This task will not be required for this project. 7. Construction Observation Services TBD 8. Warranty Phase a) The Consultant will coordinate warranty items between the City and the Contractor during the one year warranty period after substantial completion of the project. This task will include preparation of requests to Contractor on behalf of the City for warranty item service calls. b) The Consultant will coordinate and conduct a warranty site inspection and associated report in accordance with Exhibit. A. 9. Start -Up Services This task will not be required for this project. 10. Contractor and Invoice Coordination for Contract Renewal (TBD) Upon completion of Part 2 of the construction contract described above, the City will have the option to renew the contract for an additional quantity of sludge and contract time based on Contractor performance. The Consultant will perform tasks City Proj. No. E16246 ONSWTP Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase 1 LNV Proj. No.150625 Exhibit "A-1" Page 12 of 14 during each renewal period to assist the City and Contractor in contract renewal efforts as described below. a) The Consultant will review and evaluate Contractor daily logs in order to determine anticipated dredging and dewatering rates for each subsequent contract renewal. b) Based on average dredging and dewatering rates, expected sludge production rates, and observed sludge levels, the Consultant will develop expected quantities for each subsequent contract renewal. c) The Consultant will provide suggestions for improvements to dredging and dewatering options and coordinate with City and Contractor to implement improvements as agreed upon by City and Contractor. d) The Consultant will revise applicable plan sheets as required to reflect the new dredging limits and issue revised sheets as a new Task Order. e) The Consultant will track program progress, expenditures and available program funds by compiling Contractor pay requests and sludge removal quantities from contractor daily logs and will provide the data to the City monthly. f) The Consultant will provide regular updates to the City on funds allocated and funds remaining. g) The Consultant will meet with City staff and Contractor to provide interpretations/clarifications of the plans, specifications and/or contract procedures. h) The Consultant will coordinate with City staff on any required changes throughout the duration of the project as directed by the City. i) The Invoice Coordination allowance described above is based on seven (7) months of service per calendar year for each contract renewal period and assumes an effort of approximately 19-hrs per month for a maximum of 5 contract renewals (5 years). The seven (7) month time frame is based on a one (1) month plan and contract document revision and re -issue period and six (6) month construction/service period. j) For contract renewals executed after the completion of the original contract, site visits will be reduced to once monthly for two (2) hours per visit for six (6) month construction duration for a maximum of five (5) contract renewals for a total of 60 hours over 5 years. An additional 2 hours per year is assumed for final walkthrough and closeout documentation. City Proj. No. E16246 ONSWTP Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase 1 LNV Proj. No.150625 Exhibit "A-1" Page 13 of 14 SUMMARY OF FEES: SCHEDULE: Date Basic Services Fees 1 Preliminary Design Phase $0 2 Design Phase $45,105 3 Bid Phase $10,080 4 Construction Phase $32,770 15 Months after NTP Subtotal Basic Services Fees $87,955 Additional Services Fees (Allowance) 1 Permit Preparation $1,300 2 ROW Acquisition $0 3 Topographic Survey $4,092 4 Environmental Issues $0 5 Public Involvement $0 6 SUE $0 7 Construction Observation Services $0 8 Warranty Phase $2,120 9 Start -Up Services $0 10 Contractor & Invoice Coord. for Contract Renewal (TBD) $0 Sub -Total Additional Services Fees Authorized $7,512 Total Authorized Fee $95,467 SCHEDULE: Date Activity TBD A/E Contract Execution (NTP) 2 Months after NTP 60% Design Submittal 4 Months after NTP 100% Design Submittal 5 Months after NTP Final Design Submittal 6 Months after NTP Advertise for Bid 9 Months after NTP Award Construction/Service Contract 15 Months after NTP Dredging Operation Completion City Proj. No. E16246 ONSWTP Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase 1 LNV Proj. No.150625 Exhibit "A-1" Page 14 of 14 Basic Services: Preliminary Phase Design Phase Bid Phase Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Additional Services: Permitting Warranty Phase Inspection Platting Survey 0 & M Manuals SCADA Subtotal Additional Services Summary of Fees Basic Services Fees Additional Services Fees Total of Fees EXHIBIT "B" SAMPLE PAYMENT REQUEST FORM COMPLETE PROJECT NAME Project No. XXXX Invoice No. 12345 Invoice Date: Sample form for: Payment Request Revised 07/27100 Total Amount Previous Total Percent Contract Amd No. 1 Amd No. 2 Contract Invoiced Invoice Invoice Complete $1,000 $0 $0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $1,000 100% 2,000 1,000 0 3,000 1,000 500 1,500 50% 500 0 250 750 0 0 0 0% 2,500 0 1,000 3,500 0 0 0 0% $6,000 $1,000 $1,250 $8,250 $750 $1,500 $2,500 30% $2,000 $0 $0 $2,000 $500 $0 $500 25% 0 1,120 0 1,120 0 0 0 0% 0 0 1,627 1,627 0 0 0 0% TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0°,6 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0% TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0% $2,000 $1,120 $1,627 $4,747 $500 $0 $500 11% $6,000 $1,000 _ $1,250 $8,250 $750 $1,500 $2,500 30% 2,000 1,120 1,627 4,747 500 0 500 11% $8,000 $2,120 $2,877 $12,997 $1,250 $1,500 $3,000 23% Contract for Professional Services Exhibit B EXHIBIT "C" Insurance Requirements Pre -Design, Design and General Consulting Contracts 1.1 Consultant must not commence work under this agreement until all required insurance has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Consultant must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. 1.2 Consultant must furnish to the Director of Engineering Services with the signed agreement a copy of Certificates of Insurance (COI) with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. A waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with COI. Project name and or number must be listed in Description Box of COI. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -written day notice of cancellation, required on all certificates or by applicable policy endorsements Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY (Errors and Omissions) $1,000,000 Per Claim (Defense costs shall be outside policy limits) If claims made policy, retro date must be prior to inception of agreement, have extended reporting period provisions and identify any limitations regarding who is insured. 1.3 In the event of accidents of any kind related to this agreement, Consultant must furnish the City with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. 1.4 Consultant shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Consultant's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. Consultant is required to provide City with renewal Certificates. 1.5 Consultant shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Consultant shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Engineering Services P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 1.6 Consultant agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: 1.6.1 Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation, non -renewal or material change in coverage, and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. 1.7 Within five (5) calendar days of a suspension, cancellation or non -renewal of coverage, Consultant shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Consultant's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 1.8 In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Consultant's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Consultant to remove the exhibit hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) if any, which become due to Consultant hereunder until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. 1.9 Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Consultant's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this agreement. 1.10 It is agreed that Consultant's insurance shall be deemed primary and non- contributory with respect to any insurance or self-insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this agreement. 1.11 It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. Arw m. City of Corpus Christi SUPPLIER NUMBER TO BE ASSIGNED 8Y CFI Y PURCHASING DIVISION CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definition. COMPANY NAME: LNV, Inc. P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: 801 Navigation, Suite 300 FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 4. Association CITY: Corpus Christi 2 Partnership 5. Other B ZIP: 78408 3. Sole Owner DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Title AKA 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3°o or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Board, Commission or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3°'u or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." NameA A Consultant FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Dan S. Leyendecker, E. Title: President (Type or Print) Signature of Certifying Person: EFINITIONS Date: 4 /2,M, a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." g. "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. Carpus Chr sti Engineering O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Intermediate Sludge Removal Phase 1 Council Presentation May 17, 2016 Project Vicinity CALALLEN IN*3i ."11,184,13 Northwest Blvd z 0) 1 sort Cfs. Project Location O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant N 411-14.CeslivfrE. Corpus Chr sti Engineering 2 Project Location Corpus Chr'sti Engineering PROJECT LOCATION Project Scope Carpus Chr sti Engineering • Design a dewatering cell adjacent to Lagoon 7 • Dredge Lagoon 7 • Pump dredge material into geotextile tubes (in dewatering cell) for dewatering Project Schedule Corpus Chr sti Engineering 2016 2017 Jun Jul ug Sep Oct Design Nov Dec Jan Feb Bid & Award Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Construction Project Estimate: 458 Calendar Days = 15 Months Projected Schedule reflects City Council award in May 2016 with anticipated construction completion by August 2017. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-18925 Date Filed: 02/26/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. LNV, Inc. Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the goods or services to be provided under the contract. ONSWTP Sludge Removal E16246 Professional engineering, architectural and/or surveying services. 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary Leyendecker, Dan Corpus Christi, TX United States X Naiser, Derek San Antonio, TX United States 1 X Viera, Robert Corpus Christi, TX United States X Trejo, Eric Corpus Christi, TX United States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. ❑ 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, und= penalty of perjury, that the hove disclosure is true and correct. � MICHELE DENSE HINOJOSA (CNOTARY PUBLIC .4"74:."State atTexas/-, Cor�xn. Exp.10/12/2016 I,‘ t AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE Swor and subscribed before me, by the said-' Sign.ture of authorized agent of contradng business entity 1'p �j� Y �f this the ((P day of 20 to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. C. VF I.9 Q- k,VIP , rUCIQ I ifs hDjDt S(Crith )[7 �^ Signature of o cer administering oath r Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www. a th i cs. state. tx. u s Version V1.0.312 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 17, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 DATE: April 29, 2016 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, P.E., Assistant City Manager MarkVV@cctexas.com (361) 826-3082 Valerie H. Gray, P.E., Executive Director, Public Works ValerieG@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: Dan Grimsbo, Interim Director of Water and Utilities DanG@cctexas.com (361) 826-1718 Jeffrey H. Edmonds, P.E., Director, Engineering Services JeffreyE@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Enqineerinq Construction Contract Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant Emissions & Odor Control Improvements CAPTION: Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a construction contract with J.S. Haren Company of Athens, Tennessee in the amount of $207,000 for the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant Emissions & Odor Control Improvements project for the Base Bid. PURPOSE: The purpose of this agenda item is to obtain authority to execute a construction contract for the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant Emissions & Odor Control Improvements project for the Base Bid. CIP Description: Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant Emissions & Odor Control Improvements The Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant has had continuing issues with nuisance odors and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) monitoring has resulted in citations and now requires additional odor abatement. Several areas, including the dissolved air flotation (DAF) unit needs odor minimization. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: This project replaces the existing Odor Control system at the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant that is currently inoperable. The replacement to the Odor Control system is required to meet the permit requirements per Texas Commission for Environmental Quality (TCEQ). The work includes a new 4,000 cubic feet per minute (cfm) air capture rate trickling biofilter system, new booster pump, concrete slab rehabilitation/replacement, replacement of existing blowers with necessary duct work and piping modifications. On April 20, 2016, the City received proposals from five (5) bidders and the respective bids were as follows: CONTRACTOR BASE BID J.S Haren Company Athens, Tennessee $207,000.00 Alman Utilities & Construction, Inc. Corpus Christi, Texas $262,015.96 DMB Construction, LLC Corpus Christi, Texas $272,160.75 BHP Engineering & Construction, LP Corpus Christi, Texas $289,880.09 R.M. Wright Construction Company El Paso, Texas $326,390.00 Note: The Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC) is $342,000. The City's consultant, Coym, Rehmet and Gutierrez Engineering, L.P., analyzed the five proposals. The lowest responsible bidder, based on the quantities provided for evaluation purposes, is J.S. Haren Company. Based on a review of J.S. Haren Company's experience and resources from the information they submitted in accordance with the contract documents, J.S. Haren Company is qualified to provide the construction services for the project. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the execution of the construction contract. 2. Do not authorize the execution of the construction contract. (Not Recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Conforms to City Fiscal Policy EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Utilities Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ®Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $96,400 $2,108,400 $2,204,800 Encumbered / Expended Amount 96,400 96,400 This Item $207,000 $207,000 Future Anticipated Expenditures This Project $485,104 $485,104 BALANCE $0.00 $1,416,296 $1,416,296 Fund(s): Wastewater CIP #16 Comments: This project requires approximately 100 calendar days with anticipated completion in October 2016. The construction contract will result in the expenditure of an amount not to exceed $207,000. RECOMMENDATION: City Staff recommends approval of a construction contract with J.S. Haren Company of Athens, Tennessee in the amount of $207,000 for the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant Emissions & Odor Control Improvements for the Base Bid. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Project Budget Location Map Presentation Form 1295 PROJECT BUDGET GREENWOOD WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EMISSIONS & ODOR CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS FUNDS AVAILABLE: Wastewater CIP $2,204,800 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction: Construction (J.S. Haren Company) THIS ITEM 207,000 Construction Contingency (10%) 20,700 *Purchase of EcoFilter System (BioAir Solutions, LLC) 257,740 Construction Inspection & Testing: Construction Inspection Estimate (TBD) $25,000 Construction Materials Testing Estimate (TBD) $20,000 Design: Design Engineer (Coym, Rehmet & Gutierrez Engineering) 175,896 **Preliminary Design (Coym, Rehmet & Gutierrez Engineering) 85,954 ***Engineering Design (Coym, Rehmet & Gutierrez Engineering) 89,942 Reimbursements: Total Reimbursements. 82,168 Contract Administration (Engineering Svcs Admin/Capital Budget/Finance) 33,072 Engineering Services (Project Mgmt/Constr Mgmt) 44,096 Misc 5,000 TOTAL $788,504 PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE $1,416,296 *Equipment Purchase approved by City Council on February 23, 2016 by Resolution No. 030773 ** Preliminary Design contract approved by City Council on June 25, 2013 by Motion No. M2013-104 ***Engineering Design contract approved by City Council on September 29,2015 by Motion No. 2015-113 �s`hf,ee dk 4 Baldwin Of 4^ eS Home? d .y, E McAidle Project Location Saratoga Blvd. Greenwood Dr. VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Crosstown Expy. 0 1 S.P.I.D. Project Number: E10047 Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant Emissions and Odor Control Improvements CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Carpus Citrsti trLgineeriing Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant Emissions & Odor Control Improvements Council Presentation May 17, 2016 Project Map Corpus Chr'sti Engineering Project Location Saratoga Blvd. Greenwood Dr. a w N 0 U 14410 2 Project Location Corpus Chr'sti Engineering 3 Project Scope Carpus Chr'sti Engineering Replacement of the existing Odor Control system to meet permit requirements of TCEQ and includes: ✓ Installing a new BioAir Biotrickling Filter system ✓ Installing new booster pump ✓ Constructing reinforced structural concrete slab ✓ Installing various yard piping ✓ Replacing existing blowers and ductwork Project Schedule Carpus Chr'sti Engineering 2016 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Bid & Award Construction Project Estimate: 100 Calendar Days = 4 Months Projected Schedule reflects City Council construction award in May 2016 with anticipated construction completion by October 2016. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. J S Haren Company Athens, TN United States Certificate Number: 2016-45513 Date Filed: 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 04/26/2016 Date Acknowledged: 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods or other property to be provided under the contract, E10047 build, renovate, water & wastewater treatment plants 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. ' : 'if•vi e',,,,, ------•,'•,,,::\ - N. - .............. ) _ ;,,,,.;,-,, , I', ,,, Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity AFFIX NC):TWO, SAM:0 SEAL-ABOiE Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said LeaVand4.,/0<x , this the 21.0 day of Apj/ 20 , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. J . S• 1-ictire,r\ P esitit Ai— gignature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath orms providedy Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 17, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 DATE: May 17, 2016 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Lawrence Mikolajczyk, Director of Solid Waste Operations lawm(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-1972 Jim Davis, Director of General Services iimdcctexas.com (361) 826-1909 Maria Pedraza, Procurement Manager mariape(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-3176 Service Agreement for Used Tire Disposal Service CAPTION: Motion approving a service agreement with Texas Land Reclamation LLC, dba UTW Tire Collection Services, Donna, Texas, for Used Tire Disposal Service in accordance with Bid Event No. 85, based on lowest responsive, responsible bid for an estimated annual expenditure of $112,134.00, of which $37,378.00 is required for the remainder of FY 2015-2016. The term of the contract will be for twelve months with options to extend for up to two additional twelve-month periods, subject to the approval of the Contractor and the City Manager or designee. Funds have been budgeted by the Fleet Maintenance Services and Solid Waste Departments in FY 2015-2016. PURPOSE: This service agreement will provide for the disposal of whole waste tires. The vendor is required to deliver empty trailers to the Fleet Service Center, JC Elliot Landfill and Cefe Valenzuela Landfill, remove the loaded trailers and dispose of the tires in accordance with all applicable Federal, State and local regulations and requirements. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The previous Contractor did not provide satisfactory service and the department did not want to exercise the option to extend the previous contract. Bids for service were resolicited. ALTERNATIVES: Not applicable. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This purchase conforms to the City's purchasing policies and procedures and State statutes regulating procurement. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Fleet Maintenance Services, Solid Waste Operations FINANCIAL IMPACT: x Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $5,295,043.99 $74,756.00 $5,369,799.99 Encumbered / Expended Amount $2,308,585.26 $0 $2,308,585.26 This item $37,378.00 $74,756.00 $112,134.00 BALANCE $2,949,080.73 $0 $2,949,080.73 Fund(s): Fleet Maintenance Service, General Comments: The $37,378.00 financial impact shown above represents four months of expenditures that will be encumbered through the end of this fiscal year. The remaining $74,756.00 for the last eight months of the contract will be requested during the normal FY 2016-2017 budget approval process. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Bid Tabulation Service Agreement Bid Event No.: 85 Used Tire Disposal Service Buyer: Rebecca Jeffcoat ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION BID TABULATION TEXAS LAND RECLAMATION LLC DONNA, TEXAS SANTA ANITEA RECLAMATION PROJE LINN, TEXAS Unit Extended Price Price Unit Extended Price Price 1. Loaded Trailer — Elliott Landfill, location — 7001 Ayers. It is estimated that 26 trailer loads of tires will be collected during a twelve month period. 2. Loaded Trailer — Cefe Landfill, location — CR20 & FM 2044. It is estimated that 26 trailer loads of tires will be collected during a twelve month period. 3. Loaded Trailer — Maintenance Services, location — 5352 Ayers Street. It is estimated that 14 trailer loads of tires will be collected during a twelve month period. Total 26 26 14 Loads Loads Loads $1,699.00 $1,699.00 $1,699.00 $44,174.00 $44,174.00 $23,786.00 $2,000.00 $52,000.00 $2,000.00 $52,000.00 $2,000.00 $28,000.00 $112,134.00 $132,000.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR USED TIRE DISPOSAL Service Agreement No. 622 THIS Used Tire Disposal Service Agreement (this "Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation ("City"), acting by and through its City Manager or his designee ("City Manager"), and TEXAS LAND RECLAMATION LLC, dba UTW TIRE COLLECTION SERVICE ("Contractor"), effective for all purposes upon execution by the City Manager. WHEREAS Contractor has proposed to provide Used Tire Disposal Services in response to Event No. 85 (which includes Specification 1106, Revised 03/09/2011) which is incorporated and attached as Exhibit A; WHEREAS the City has determined Contractor to be the lowest responsive, responsible bidder; NOW, THEREFORE, Contractor and City enter into this Agreement and agree as follows: 1. Services. Contractor shall provide Used Tire Disposal Services in accordance with Event No. 85 (which includes Specification 1106, Revised 03/09/2011). ("Services"), which request for bid and related specifications, if any, are attached to this Agreement and incorporated by reference into this Agreement as Exhibit "A". Contractor's bid to provide the services is attached to this Agreement and incorporated by reference into this Agreement as Exhibit "B". 2. Term. This Agreement is for a term of one year, commencing on issuance of a Notice to Proceed and continuing for twelve months thereafter. The term includes an option to extend for up to two additional one-year periods subject to the approval of the Contractor and the City Manager. 3. Payment and Compensation. This Agreement is for an amount not to exceed $112,134.00, subject to authorized extensions and changes. Payment terms are net 30 days after the goods are provided or services are completed, as required, or a correct invoice is received, whichever is later. 4. Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this Agreement including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for payment. All of the Contractor's notices and communications regarding this Agreement must be directed to the Contract Administrator, who serves as the Contract Administrator, unless indicated otherwise in this Agreement. 5. Independent Contractor. Contractor shall perform the Services hereunder as an independent contractor and furnish such Services in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances will any employee, agent, or representative of the Contractor be considered an employee of the City. 6. Insurance. Before Services can begin under this Agreement, the Contractor's insurance company must deliver a Certificate of Insurance as proof of the required insurance coverages to the Contract Administrator. Additionally, the certificate must state that the Solid Waste Contract Administrator will be given at least thirty days' notice of cancellation, material change in the coverages, or intent not to renew any of the policies. The City must be named as an additional insured. The City Attorney must be given copies of all insurance policies within 15 days of the City Manager's written request to Contractor. Insurance Requirements are attached and incorporated by reference into this Agreement as Exhibit C. 7. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement nor any right or interest herein held by the Contractor is effective unless the City Manager first gives written consent to such assignment. The performance of this Agreement by the Contractor is the essence of this Agreement, and the City's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City Manager on any ground whatsoever. 8. Fiscal Year. All parties recognize that the continuation of any contract after the close of any fiscal year of the City (the City's fiscal year ends each September 30th) is subject to budget approval and appropriations providing for such contract item as an expenditure in the fiscal budget. The City does not represent that a budget item for this Agreement will be actually adopted, as that determination is within the sole discretion of the City Council at the time of adoption of each fiscal budget. 9. Waiver. No waiver by either party of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement waives any subsequent breach of the same. 10. Compliance with Laws. This Agreement is subject to all applicable federal, state and local laws. All duties of the parties will be performed in Corpus Christi, Texas. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of Texas, and the forum and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district or county court in and for Nueces County, Texas. 11. Subcontractors. The Contractor may use subcontractors in connection with the work performed under this Agreement. When using subcontractors, however, the Contractor must obtain prior written approval from the Contract Administrator. In using subcontractors, the Contractor is responsible for all their acts and omissions to the same extent as if the subcontractor and its employees were employees of the Contractor. All requirements set forth as part of this Agreement are applicable to all subcontractors and their employees to the same extent as if the Contractor and its employees had performed the services. 12. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended only in writing and signed by persons authorized to execute the same by both parties. 13. Termination. A. The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Contractor's failure to perform the services specified in this Agreement and its exhibits. The Contract Administrator must give the Contractor written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Contractor has not cured within the cure period stated in the notice, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. Failure to keep all insurance policies in force for the entire term of this Agreement is grounds for termination. B. Alternatively, the City may terminate this Agreement without cause upon twenty days' advance written notice to the Contractor. However, the City may terminate this Agreement upon twenty-four hours' advance written notice to the Contractor for the Contractor's failure to pay any required taxes or to provide proof of payment of taxes as set out in this Agreement. The Contractor may terminate this Agreement upon ninety days' advance written notice to the City. 14. Taxes. The Contractor covenants to pay all applicable federal and state payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment taxes, and all other taxes in accordance with Circular E "Employer's Tax Guide", Publication 15, as it may be amended. Upon request, the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of these taxes within fifteen days of such request. 15. Notice. Notice must be given by personal delivery, facsimile (fax), or by certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested, and is deemed received on the date hand -delivered or faxed. with proof of accepted transmission, and on the third day after deposit in the U.S. mail if sent certified mail. Notice must be sent as follows: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Attention: Solid Waste Contract Administrator P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 Fax # (361) 826-1971 IF TO CONTRACTOR: Contractor Name: Texas Land Reclamation LLC, dba UTW Tire Collection Services Contact Person: Penelope M Oaks Mailing Address: PO Box 1236 City, State, ZIP: Donna, Texas 78537 Email Address: utwtirepennie@gmail.com 16. Extensions. This Agreement is subject to two twelve-month extensions at the same terms and conditions. These extensions may be exercised at the sole discretion of the City. 17. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is severable and if, for any reason, any provision or any part thereof is determined to be invalid and contrary to any applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of or affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, but this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part thereof had been omitted. 18. INDEMNIFICATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS ("INDEMNITEES") FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF ANY NATURE ON ACCOUNT OF DEATH, PERSONAL INJURIES, PROPERTY LOSS OR DAMAGE OR ANY OTHER KIND OF LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES WHICH ARISE OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE INJURIES, DEATH, OR DAMAGES ARE CAUSED OR ARE CLAIMED TO BE CAUSED BY THE CONCURRENT OR CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES BUT NOT IF BY THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES UNMIXED WITH THE FAULT OF ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY. CONTRACTOR MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, INVESTIGATE ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL REASONABLY SATISFACTORY TO INDEMNITEES, AND PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ANY KIND ARISING FROM ANY SAID LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR UNDER THIS SECTION SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR SOONER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. 19. Certificate of Interested Parties. Contractor agrees to comply with Texas Government Code section 2252.908 and complete Form 1295 "Certificate of Interested Parties" as part of this Agreement. Contractor: Texas,L-an Signature: Reclamation LLC, dba UT AID e�ollecti o n - e: Ar Printed Name: Penelop= M. Oaks Title: Owner Date: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Signature: Printed Name: Title: Date: Attached and Incorporated by Reference: Exhibit A: Bid Event No. 85 Specification 1106, dated 03/09/11 Exhibit B: Bidder's Bid Sheet Exhibit C: Insurance Requirements CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCIIASING DIVISION Exhibit A SPECIFICATION NO. 1106 Revised March 9, 2011 PAGE 1 OF 1 SPECIFICATIONS FOR USED TIRE DISPOSAL SERVICE Statement of Need The City will establish a service contract for disposing of whole used tires collected at the Elliott Landfill, located at 7001 Ayers, Cefe Landfill, located at CR20 & FM 2044, and the City's Maintenance Services facility, located at 5352 Ayers. This service consists of the furnishing of trailers and disposal of whole used tires collected by Solid Waste Services and Maintenance Services. Requirements The successful contractor must be registered by the Texas Commission of Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and have a TCEQ permitted storage and/or processing facility for proper tire disposal/processing. All tires disposed/processed under this contract shall be in accordance with all Federal, State and local rules and regulations concerning the safe and proper disposal of tires. The successful contractor will be required to inventory a minimum of four trailers to service the City's account, two at the Elliott Landfill, one at the Cefe Landfill and one at Maintenance Services. Upon execution of the contract, the successful contractor will furnish two trailers, minimum of forty feet long, at the Elliott Landfill, one trailer, minimum of forty feet long, at the Cefe Landfill and one trailer, minimum of forty feet long, at Maintenance Services. When a trailer is filled, the City will notify the successful contractor for removal of the filled trailer. Within one (1) day of being notified, the successful contractor will be required to bring an empty trailer to the requested site (Elliott Landfill, Cefe Landfill or Maintenance Services), place it at an acceptable location to the City and pick-up the filled trailer for disposal. The inventory requirement is necessary to ensure the Elliott Landfill and Cefe Landfill are in Regulatory Compliance and Maintenance Services have an adequate amount of trailers on hand to store whole tires. Failure to comply with trailer inventory requirements and/or one (1) day turn around will be grounds for contract cancellation. The City reserves the right to cancel the contract after three incidents have been documented to the successful contractor of inadequate trailer inventory and/or delays in trailer removal. Bidders are requested to indicate how the tires will ultimately be disposed/processed. Exhibit B CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION BID SIIEET BID INVITATION NO. Event No. 85 DATE: 11/02/2015 UTW Tire Collection Services- P.M. Oaks BIDDER 1. Refer to "Instructions to Bidders" and Standard Purchase Terms and Conditions before completing bid. 2. Quote your best price, F.O.B. Destination, on each item. 3. In submitting this bid, Bidder certifies that: a. the prices in this bid have been arrived at independently, without consultation, communication or agreement with any other Bidder or competitor, for the purpose of restricting competition with regard to prices; b. Bidder is an Equal Opportunity Employer; and c. the disclosure of Interest information on file with the City's purchasing office, pursuant to the Code of Ordinances, is current and true. ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE Twelve-month service agreement with option to extend for up to two (2) additional twelve-month periods subject to the approval of the City Manager or designee for used tire disposal service per Specification No. 1106. revised 03/09/11. 1. Loaded Trailer — Elliott Landfill, location — 7001 Ayers. 26 Loads 1,699.00 44,174.00 It is estimated that 26 trailer loads of tires will be collected during a twelve month period. 2. Loaded Trailer -- Cefe Landfill, location — CR20 & FM 26 Loads 1,699.00 44,174.00 2044. It is estimated that 26 trailer loads of tires will be collected during a twelve month period. 3. Loaded Trailer — Maintenance Services, location — 5352 14 Loads 1,699.00 23,786.00 Ayers Street. It is estimated that 14 trailer loads of tires will be collected during a twelve month period. Exhibit C INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS I. BIDDER'S LIABILITY INSURANCE A. Bidder must not commence work under this contract until all insurance required has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Bidder must not allow any subcontractor, to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. B. Bidder must furnish to the City's Risk Manager and Director of Utilities one (1) copy of Certificates of Insurance with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies by endorsement, and a waiver of subrogation endorsement is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with Certificate of Insurance. Project name and/or number must be listed in Description Box of Certificate of Insurance. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -day advance written notice of cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination required on all certificates and policies. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises — Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Bidders 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non -Owned 3. Rented/Leased $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit WORKERS'S COMPENSATION (All States Endorsement if Company is not domiciled in Texas) Employer's Liability Statutory and complies with Part II of this Exhibit. $500,000/$500,000/$500,000 C. In the event of accidents of any kind related to this contract, Bidder must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. II. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Applicable for paid employees, Bidder must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers' compensation coverage provided must be in statutory amounts according to the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation. An All States Endorsement shall be required if Bidder is not domiciled in the State of Texas. B. Bidder shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Bidder's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. C. Bidder shall be required to submit renewal certificates of insurance throughout the term of this contract and any extensions within 10 days of the policy expiration dates. All notices under this Exhibit shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 D. Bidder agrees that, with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • List the City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, as additional insureds by endorsement with regard to operations, completed operations, and activities of or on behalf of the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; • Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and • Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any, cancellation, non- renewal, material change or termination in coverage and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. E. Within five (5) calendar days of a cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination of coverage, Bidder shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Bidder's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. F. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Bidder's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Bidder to stop work hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Bidder hereunder until Bidder demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. G. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Bidder may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Bidder's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this contract. H. It is agreed that Bidder's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this contract. I. It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this contract. 2015 Insurance Requirements Solid Waste Department Tire Disposal Services — City Landfills 9/10/2015 ds Risk Management CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-8841 Date Filed: 02/03/2016 Date Acknowledged: e� 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Texas Land Reclamation, LLC dba UTW Tire Collection Services Donna, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the goods or services to be provided under the contract. Contract # 622 Used Tire Disposal Services ( Event No 85) 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. X 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. �`!!,.. JOSHUA JARAMILLO _4';' I I, Notary Publ.c, State of Texas „. " .. ` My Commission Expires - ''„foi.;;�' February 14 , 2018 / r �Jk 7 .-/ ` �� / AFFIX Sworn NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE to and subscribed before me, by the said --+_,.;--Sig`atufe of '`('':j rC Icyri e, it'll - (0 thorize rielit of cbnfracting bu mess entity - V47 this the (' day of 20 , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. III /1 II S'gnature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath orms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www. ethics. state.tx. us Version V1.0.34416 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 17, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 DATE: May 17, 2016 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Terry Teri, Interim Director of Municipal Court terryt(a�cctexas.com (361) 826-2515 Maria Pedraza, Procurement Manager mariape(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-3176 Service Agreement for Security Guard and Bailiff Services for Municipal Court CAPTION: Resolution finding the lowest responsive, responsible bidder for commissioned security guard and bailiff services in response to Bid Event No. 95; awarding a service agreement to Deacon 10, LLC, of Euclid, Ohio, dba Premier Protective Services; and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a service agreement with the lowest, responsible bidder for commissioned security guard and bailiff services. PURPOSE: This is a resolution to approve service agreements for security guard and bailiff services for the Municipal Court. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: On February 8, 2016, the bid process was started for new security guard and bailiff services for the Municipal Court. The bid solicitation specified that the bid could be awarded based on a single award or as a split award. On February 22, 2016, the bid process closed and the two lowest bidders were identified. At first Vets Securing America, of San Antonio, Texas; which has an operating office in Corpus Christi, Texas, was the lowest responsive, responsible bidder for security guard services. However, they did not understand that security guards were to be armed and their price did not cover this cost; therefore they could not provide the service as bid. Deacon 10, LLC, of Euclid, Ohio; with a regional office in Arlington, Texas was identified as the lowest responsive, responsible bidder for bailiff services. However, this firm is headquartered in Ohio which causes the local bid preference to control the determination of the lowest bidder. After applying the 5% rule, Eddie Garza Security became the lowest bidder for both services, but is not being recommended due to past performance issues deeming this bidder as non - responsible. Base Security & Fire Consultants, LLC, of Rosenberg, Texas, was identified as the next lowest responsive, responsible bidder for both services; however they did not meet the five year minimum requirement as an established business as outlined in the bid solicitation specifications. Therefore, the award for both of these services is reverting back to Deacon 10, LLC dba Premier Protective Services as they now comply with the 5% local preference rule as the next Texas bidder is 13.3% higher than Premier Protective Services. Deacon 10, LLC dba Premier Protective Services has committed to opening an office in Corpus Christi, Texas. They have some staff ready to relocate to Corpus Christi and will be hiring locally and will provide in-house training for security services at their Corpus Christi office. The term of the agreement was originally for three years with options to extend for up to two additional one-year term. The original term has been changed to a term of one year with the options to extend for up to two one-year term to allow time to eventually bring some of these services in-house. ALTERNATIVES: Award the security guard and bailiff services contract to Eddie Garza Security of Corpus Christi, Texas on a finding that Eddie Garza Security is a responsible bidder and Deacon 10, LLC is a nonresidential bidder. Award the security guard and bailiff services contract to Base Security & Fire Consultants, LLC of Rosenberg, Texas on a finding that Eddie Garza Security is not a responsible bidder, and Deacon 10, LLC is a nonresidential bidder, and a waiver of bid specification to have operated continuously for a minimum of 5 years as an established firm in the business of providing Bailiff Services or security guard services. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This purchase conforms to the City's purchasing policies and procedures and State statutes regulating procurement. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Municipal Court FINANCIAL IMPACT: x Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015- 2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $68,000.00 $107,328.00 $175,328.00 Encumbered / Expended Amount $0 $0 $0 This item $53,664.00 $107,328.00 $160,992.00 BALANCE $14,336.00 $0 $14,336.00 Fund(s): Municipal Court Comments: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Resolution as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Bid Tabulation Resolution Service Agreement Bid Event No.: 95 Security Guard and Bailiff Services Buyer: Jeannette P. Tijerina ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. - 3 YR UNIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION BID TABULATION VETS SECURING BASE SECURITY & FIRE EDDIE GARZA SECURITY AMERICA CONSULTANTS, LLC. CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS ROSENBERG, TEXAS P & AI, LLC dba Park & Associates Investigations CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEACON 10, LLC dba Premier Protective Services EUCLID, OHIO Unit Extended Price Price Unit Extended Price Price Unit Extended Price Price Unit Extended Price Price Unit Extended Price Price 1 Contracted Commissioned Municipal Bailiff Services 2 Security Guards Totals Total Award 18,720 18,720 HR HR $13.00 $243,360.00 $14.74 $275,932.80 $13.00 $243,360.00 $12.13 $227,073.60 $486,720.00 $470,433.60 $503,006.40 $13.45 $251,784.00 $13.45 $251,784.00 $503,568.00 $20.75 $388,440.00 $18.50 $346,320.00 $734,760.00 NOTE: Vets Securing America's price for security guard services is for unarmed security guards, specifications require armed security guards. Actual price is $14.74 for these services. Alpha Security Solutions submitted a late bid and therefore is deemed non-responsive $12.90 $241,488.00 $12.90 $241,488.00 $482,976.00 ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. - 1 YR UNIT EDDIE GARZA SECURITY CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS VETS SECURING AMERICA SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS BASE SECURITY & FIRE CONSULTANTS, LLC. ROSENBERG, TEXAS P & AI, LLC dba Park & Associates Investigations CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEACON 10, LLC dba Premier Protective Services EUCLID, OHIO Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price 1 2. Contracted Commissioned Municipal Bailiff Services Security Guards 6,240 6,240 HR HR $13.00 $13.00 $81,120.00 $81,120.00 $14.74 $12.13 $91,977.60 $75,691.20 $13.45 $13.45 $83,928.00 $83,928.00 $20.75 $18.50 $129,480.00 $115,440.00 $12.90 $12.90 $80,496.00 $80,496.00 Totals Total Award $162,240.00 (1) 8160.992.00 $167,668.80 (2) $167,856.00 (3) $244,920.00 (4) $160.992.00 (5) NOTE: Bid tabulation reflects the change of hours for the term from three years, 18,720 hours for each service, to one year, 6240 hours for each service. (1) Eddie Garza is deemed not responsible due to performance. (2) Vets Securing America's withdrew their bid due to not being able to provided armed security guards at the proposed bid rate. Actual price is $14.74 for these services. (3) Base Security & Fire Consultants fail to meet specification to have operated continuously for a minimum of five (5) years as an established firm in the business of providing Bailiff Services or security guard services (4) Highest bidder. (5) Deacon 10, LLC dba Premier Protective Services is an out-of-town bidder; applied 5% local bidder preference. Alpha Security Solutions submitted a late bid and therefore is deemed non-responsive Resolution finding the lowest responsive responsible bidder for commissioned security guard and bailiff services in response to Bid Event No. 95; awarding a service agreement to Deacon 10, LLC, of Euclid, Ohio, dba Premier Protective Services; and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a service agreement with the lowest, responsible bidder for commissioned security guard and bailiff services. WHEREAS, the services to be provided by the selected contractor have been competitively bid based upon and in accordance with a procurement method authorized by State law and Article X, Sec. 2, of the Charter of the City of Corpus Christi ("City"); WHEREAS, the City received five bids for commissioned security guard and bailiff services in response to Bid Event No. 95, of which only the lowest responsive, responsible bidder will be awarded a commissioned security guard and bailiff services contract ("contract"); WHEREAS, State law provides that, if the competitive sealed bidding require- ment applies to a contract for goods or services, the contract must be awarded to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder or to the bidder that provides the best value, pursuant to Texas Local Government Code §252.043(a); WHEREAS, Vets Securing America of San Antonio, TX withdrew their bid due to a substantial mistake regarding security guard pricing; WHEREAS, Base Security & Fire Consultants, LLC of Rosenberg, Texas fails to meet a specification to have operated continuously for a minimum of 5 years as an established firm in the business of providing Bailiff Services or security guard services; WHEREAS, the City finds that Eddie Garza Security & Investigation of Corpus Christi, TX is not a responsible bidder due to their performance under Service Agreement SA13-045, where security guard services provided were not to standard. The Airport, City Hall and Libraries have experienced absences and tardiness of security guards on multiple occasions, received incorrect invoicing for services, suffered and witnessed unprofessional behavior by guards, and routine disregard for request to remedy deficiencies identified by staff; WHEREAS, the City has determined and finds that Eddie Garza Security & Investigation is not a responsible bidder and it is in the best interest of the City to reject the Eddie Garza Security & Investigation bid; WHEREAS, the City has determined and finds that it is in the best interest of the public to award a contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Deacon 10, LLC, dba Premier Protective Services of Euclid, Ohio; with a regional office in Arlington, TX, in accordance with Bid Event No. 95; and WHEREAS, in the event the lowest responsive, responsible bidder fails to execute the con -tract for the awarded item or fails to perform under a contract for any awarded item, the City Manager, or his designee, is authorized to execute a contract for the remainder of the contract term with the next lowest bidder, in succession, in order to secure replacement commissioned security guard and bailiff services for the Municipal Court. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: Section 1. The City Council finds the foregoing preamble language stated in this resolution to be true and correct. Section 2.. The City Council finds that Deacon 10, LLC, dba Premier Protective Services is the lowest responsive responsible bidder for commissioned security guard and bailiff services for the Municipal Court in Bid Event No. 95 and is awarded a contract in the amount up to $160,992. Section 3. The City Manager, or his designee, is authorized to execute a contract with the lowest responsible bidder in accordance with the terms and conditions stated in Bid Event No. 95. Furthermore, in the event the lowest responsible bidder fails to execute the contract for the awarded item or fails to perform under a contract for any awarded item, the City Manager, or his designee, is authorized to execute a contract for the remainder of the contract term with the next lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in succession, in order to secure commissioned security guard and bailiff services. ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor Page 2 of 3 Corpus Christi, Texas of The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Rudy Garza Michael Hunter Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Brian Rosas Lucy Rubio Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughn Page 3 of 3 Service Agreement Agreement No. 624 SECURITY GUARD AND BAILIFF SERVICES THIS SECURITY GUARD AND BAILIFF SERVICES ("Agreement") is entered into by and between Deacon 10, LLC dba Premier Protective Services ("Contractor"), of St. Euclid, Ohio and the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation ("City'', effective for all purposes upon execution by the City Manager or designee ("City Manager"). WHEREAS, Contractor has bid to provide Security Guard and Bailiff Services in response to the City's Request for Bids ("RFB No. 95") which RFB No. 95 with any related specifications, and Contractor's bid response, are incorporated by reference into this Agreement as Exhibits "1 and 2"; WHEREAS, the City has determined Contractor to be the lowest, responsive, responsible bidder; NOW, THEREFORE, Contractor and City enter into this Agreement and agree as follows: 1. Scope. Contractor will provide Security Guard and Bailiff Services ("Services") in accordance with this Agreement and the Scope of Services as shown in Attachment "A" which is attached and incorporated by reference. 2. Term. This Agreement is for a term of twelve (12) months, commencing on the date signed by the City Manager. The term includes an option to extend for up to two (2) additional twelve-month periods subject to the approval of the Contractor and the City Manager, or designee for Services. 3. Compensation and Payment. This Agreement is for an amount not to exceed $160,992, subject to validly authorized extensions and changes. Payments will be allowed in accordance with Attachment "B" Schedule of Pricing actual hours worked times the hourly rate shown on Attachment B. Payment terms are net 30 days after the goods are provided or Services are completed or a correct invoice is received, whichever is later. Page 1 of 6 4. Contract Administrator. The contract administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this Agreement including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for payment. All of the Contractor's notices or communications regarding this Agreement must be directed to the Contract Administrator or designee ("Contract Administrator") as follows: Terry Teri, Interim Director of Municipal Court Municipal Court P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 Fax: (361) 826-3560 Email: TerrvT@cctexas.com 5. Independent Contractor. Contractor will perform the Services as an independent contractor and will furnish such Services in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances or conditions may any agent, servant or employee of the Contractor be considered an employee of the City. 6. Insurance. Before Services can begin under this Agreement, the Contractor must deliver a Certificate of Insurance, as proof of the required insurance coverage, to the Contract Administrator and City's Risk Manager. The Contractor's insurance requirements are attached to this Agreement as Attachment "C" and incorporated by reference. 7. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement or of any right or interest contained in this Agreement by the Contractor is effective unless the City Manager first gives its written consent to such assignment. The performance of this Agreement by the Contractor is of the essence of this Agreement, and the City's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City Manager on any ground whatsoever. 8. Fiscal Year. All parties recognize that the continuation of any contract after the close of any fiscal year of the City (the City's fiscal year ends on September 30th) is subject to appropriations and budget approval providing for such contract item as an expenditure in the budget. The City does not represent that said budget item will be actually adopted, as that determination is within the sole discretion of the City Council at the time of adoption of each budget. TnIs Agreemenr waives any subsequenr oreacn or me some. 10. Governing Law. This Agreement is subject to all federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of Texas and such form and venue for such disputes Page 2 of 6 is the appropriate district, county or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas. 11. Subcontractors. The Contractor may use subcontractors in connection with the Services to be performed under this Agreement. When using subcontractors, however, the Contractor must obtain prior written approval from the Contract Administrator unless such subcontractors were named and_ included at the time of bid. In using subcontractors, the Contractor shall be responsible for all their acts and omissions to the same extent as if the subcontractor and its employees were employees of the Contractor. All requirements set forth as part of this Agreement are applicable to all subcontractors and their employees to the same extent as if the Contractor and its employees had performed the Services. 12. Amendments/Extensions. This Agreement may be amended only in writing and upon execution by authorized representatives of both parties. Such amendment will be in the form of a change order. Extensions to this Agreement will be at the sole discretion of the City and if offered to the Contractor will be mutually agreed to in the form of a bilateral change order. 13. Termination. a. The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Contractor's failure to perform the Services specified in this Agreement. Failure to keep any required insurance policies in force for the entire term of this Agreement is grounds for termination. The Contract Administrator must give the Contractor written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Contractor has not cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. b. Alternatively, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement without cause upon 20 days' written notice to the Contractor. However, the City may terminate this Agreement upon 24 hours written notice to the Contractor for Contractor's failure to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes, as set out in this Agreement. 14. Taxes. The Contractor covenants to timely pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment taxes and all other related taxes. Upon request, the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of these taxes within 15 days of such request. Failure to pay or provide proof of payment is grounds for the City Manager to immediately terminate this Agreement. i . i. ernncate OT interestea males. L.onrracror agrees To comply wiTf texas Government Code Section 2252.908 and complete Form 1295 "Certificate of Interested Parties" as part of this Agreement. 16. Notice. Notice must be given by fax, email, hand delivery or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is received on the day faxed, emailed or hand - Page 3 of 6 delivered and on the third day after postmarked by the U.S. mail if sent certified mail. Notice must be sent as follows: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Attention: Terry Teri, Interim Director of Municipal Court P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 Fax: (361) 826-2560 Email: TerryT@cctexas.com IF TO CONTRACTOR: Deacon 10, LLC dba Premier Protective Services Attention: Michael St. Andre 1353 E. 260th St. Euclid, Ohio 44132 Fax: (216) 731-5002 Email: mike@mvpremiersecuritv.com 17. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is considered to be severable and if, for any reason, any such provision or any part thereof, is determined to be invalid and contrary to any existing or future applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of or affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, and this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part thereof had been omitted. 18. INDEMNIFICATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS ("INDEMNITEES") FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF ANY NATURE ON ACCOUNT OF PERSONAL INJURIES, INCLUDING THOSE RESULTING IN WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS OR DEATH, PROPERTY LOSS OR DAMAGE, OR ANY OTHER KIND OF LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES WHICH ARISE OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT AND REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE INJURIES, DEATH, LOSS, OR DAMAGES CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES BUT NOT IF BY THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES UNMIXED WITH THE FAULT OF ANY OTHER PERSON. CONTRACTOR MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, INVESTIGATE ALL NOTICES, CLAIMS, AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR SETTLEMENT OR Page 4 of 6 OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL REASONABLY SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ANY KIND ARISING FROM ANY OF SAID LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR UNDER THIS SECTION SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. 19. Order of Precedence. In the event of conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement and its exhibits or attachments, such conflicts or inconsistencies will be resolved by reference to the documents in the following order of priority: this Agreement, its Attachments, the RFB No. 95 documents including addenda, and the bid response. 20. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, either oral or written, between the parties. Page 5 of 6 CONTRACTOR Signature: Printed Name: kc)il(L.e\ .. iQ Title:re50,e-.ck Date: Sill 1 k(e CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Signature: Printed Name: Title: Date: Attached: Attachment A: Scope of Work Attachment B: Schedule of Pricing Attachment C: Insurance Requirements Incorporated by Reference Only: Exhibit 1: REB No. 95, RFB Security Guard and Bailiff Services Exhibit 2: Contractor's Bid Response Page 6 of 6 Attachment A - Scope of Work CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION SPECIFICATIONS FOR SECURITY GUARDS AND BAILIFFS CORPUS CHRISTI MUNICIPAL COURT 120 N. Chaparral Street - Corpus Christi, TX 78401 SPECIFICATION NO. 1247 REVISED: JANUARY 19, 2016 SECTION I GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND BIDDING INSTRUCTIONS 1. GENERAL INTENTION: The purpose of this specification is to procure, from a single Service Contractor, Municipal Court Bailiffs and Security Guards (herein called Bailiffs), as described in the Section II - TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS contained herewith, for the Corpus Christi Municipal Court. 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Bidder shall provide Municipal Court Bailiffs and Security Guards completely outfitted with matching uniforms and all essential equipment deemed, by the City, as necessary to carry out the duties of Bailiffs for the Corpus Christi Municipal Court. The Bailiffs will be Security Officer Commissioned to carry a firearm, commissioned by the Service Contractor, and will carry a weapon while on duty at the Municipal Court. Services shall be provided according to the normal operating hours as described under Section II, Part 3, labeled Technical Specifications of this document. 3. LOCATION: The services shall be provided for the Corpus Christi Municipal Court located at 120 N. Chaparral Street, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas. 4. TERMS OF CONTRACT: The Contract shall be for a period of one year, with an option to extend the term of the contract for up to two additional twelve month periods, with all terms and conditions remaining unchanged, subject to the approval of the Service Contractor and the City Manager, or his designee and subject to available fimding. The City may terminate the Contract without cause upon twenty (20) days' advance written notice to the Contractor. 5. TYPE OF CONTRACT: This is a firm price contract with the award to be based on the hourly rate established for the total estimated hours of the Bailiff requirements. Compensation for additional Bailiff Services rendered beyond those specified in the contract, (weekend or after normal business hours) will be paid to the Service Contractor by the City at the hourly rates established in the contract. The City reserves the right to order additional services at the rates established by the contract, providing such services are ordered with at least 24 hours prior notice. Pavmfnt of monthly invnirec for stated cervirec will he mane hncerl nn the rates pctahlichrrl 6. EXAMINATION OF THE PREMISES: Bidders are expected (encouraged) to visit the site to acquaint themselves with the general and specific conditions under which they will be required to perform the work and which may affect the cost of the performance of the work to the extent that such information is reasonably obtainable. It is considered impracticable to determine, without inspection, the exact nature of the work, and site conditions under which the work is to be performed. No extras will be allowed for a bidder's failure to visit the site. Bidders may access pertinent technical material by contacting the Contract Administrator as follows: The City of Corpus Christi: Attention: Terry Teri Interim Director of Municipal Court 120 N. Chaparral Street Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Mail: P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469 Phone: (361) 886-2515 7. LICENSING AND QUALIFICATIONS: A. The Bidder must be licensed to provide services by the Texas Department of Public Safety, Private Security Bureau. The Bidder will also conform to all other laws, rules and regulations pertaining to security companies as set forth by local, state, and federal governmental agencies and authorities having jurisdiction. B. The Bidder must have operated continuously for a minimum of five (5) years as an established firm in the business of providing Bailiff Services or security guard services. The Bidder must provide contact information of owner/partners/president; vice president; local manager; direct supervisor; and lead Bailiff, including name; title; phone number; cell number; mailing address; and email for each. C. Bidders are expected to provide only Bailiffs who meet all the requirements as specified in Section II, Technical Specification, of this document; will conduct themselves in a professional, businesslike manner at all times; and adhere to the provisions as set forth in the Bidder's Violence in the Workplace Policy and Alcohol and Drug Abuse Policy. The Bidder expressly agrees to remove from duty any Bailiff whose continuing assignment is deemed by the Contract Administrator to be contrary to the terms of the contract, contrary to the public interest, or inconsistent with the best interest of the City. D. Bidders are expected to ensure that all Bailiffs assigned to the Municipal Court possess a certified identification card. Bidder must provide proof of Crime Policy/Employee Dishonesty Bond and deliver respective copies for all Bailiffs assigned to duty at the Municipal Court. Failure to provide this information may result in rejection of bid. Trainees will only be allowed to be posted alongside a Municipal Court Bailiff for training purposes and only after proper courtroom etiquette has been properly conveyed. E. The Bidder's plan for scheduled and unscheduled absences must be documented and submitted to the Contract Administrator, prior to the execution of the contract. Additionally nlanc for the nn_onino recr-nitment of rinalif Pd Raiiiffc meet hP rlicriisiPcl contract. F. The Bidder must become familiar with the Municipal Court Emergency Procedures and provide Bailiffs knowledgeable of these procedures. Reference Section 11, Part 16, of this specification, titled Emergency Procedures. G. At Bidder's expense, Bidder shall conduct Drug Testing as described in Section 1, Part 7, H, of this specification. To this end, the City has zero -tolerance for drug and alcohol abuse. The City vigorously complies with the requirements of the Drug Free Workplace Act of 1988 and all drug testing regulations issued by the U.S. Department of Transportation. H. Bidder must use a drug testing laboratory certified by the Federal Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and must follow United States Department of Transportation Procedures identified in 49 Code of Federal Regulation, Part 40. Moreover, chain -of -custody procedures will be followed to account for the integrity of each specimen by tracking its handling and storage from point of specimen collection to final disposition of the specimen. Each specimen submitted for testing will be assayed for the presence of the following compounds: DRUG GROUP EMIT SCREEN GC/MS DETECTION CONFIRMATION LEVEL DETECTION LEVEL ng/rnl* mg/ml` Amphetamines 1000 500 Barbiturates 300-1000** 200 Benzodiazepines 300 200 Cocaine Metabolites 300 150 Marijuana Metabolites 50 15 Methadone 300 200 Methaqualone 300 200 Opiate Metabolites 300 300 Phencyclidine 25 25 Propoxyphene 300 200 * nonograms/milliliter ** The limit of detection varies according to the specific drug and/or metabolite(s) present. i, Prior and periodic testing is mandatory for every Bailiff assigned to work at the Municipal Court. Bidders shall conduct, prior to assignment and placement at Municipal Court, background and credit investigations on every Bailiff. The results of said background/credit check shall be furnished to the City's Director of Human Resources, or his/her designee, who will determine each prospective temporary staffer's eligibility for placement at the Municipal Court. For those prospective Bailiffs who have resided solely in the State of Texas for the ten years immediately preceding their placement at the Municpal Court, the Bidder need only conduct a State of Texas background check which shall consist of a search for criminal convictions at the state level and in those counties in w :d _41rn .yr.n v. f:il.z_itzw. rn..._._ookn..i,_��.isa4..3__A_lI._x..ma4-:nWit;....a_ L.4.11._11 prospective Bailiffs who have resided outside of the State of Texas at any time and for any duration during the ten years immediately preceding their placement at the Municipal Court, the Bidder shall conduct a national background check which shall consist of a search of the following for criminal convictions: a. Federal records and records of the states and counties/parishes in which said prospective Bailiff, Bailiff trainee, and Security Guard has resided in the ten years immediately preceding placement with the Municipal Court. b. All background checks shall search for criminal convictions and Also -Known -As (AKA). J. Random Drug Tests will be conducted after the assignment, in compliance with Section 1, Part 7, H, of this specification, for all Bailiffs assigned to duty at Municipal Court. Bailiffs must also comply with all Police Department security checks. Any employee of the Bidder failing a Drug Test or who, in the opinion of the Bidder or City has an abnormally high debt to earnings ratio, shall not be assigned to duty at Municipal Court. Failure to provide the Contract Administrator or designee the above proof or affirmation statement with each replacement or temporary assivned Bailiff, prior to placement, will result in a $500 deduction from the next monthly invoice. K. The Municipal Court is a "Smoke Free" building, therefore, no smoking in any form is allowed by employees, contractors, vendors, visitors, or anyone within the building including employees of the Bidder. The Bailiffs will enforce this ordinance at the Municipal Court. L. All Bailiffs assigned to duty at the Municipal Court shall be trained and will undergo periodic refresher training in the following areas: a. Red Cross Certified First Aid procedures and resuscitation procedures including the use of cardio -pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and the Heimlich maneuver_ Proof of training for each assigned Bailiff must be submitted with bid. Proof that this certification is being kept current must be submitted to the Contract Administrator within 10 days of the expiration. b. Communication procedures including the use of portable two-way radio equipment and cellular telephones. c. Police procedures in public relations, facility security, personal safety, emergency management, personal assaults, disorderly conduct, public intoxication, juvenile delinquency, patrolling and surveillance, and reporting techniques. d. Writing and maintenance of daily reports of activities or problems at Municipal Court as well as accident or incident reports covering mishaps, unusual events, and the like. e. Bailiff Courtroom procedure training. M. The Bidder shall provide at least two passport size photographs of all Bailiffs assigned to work at the Municipal Court upon each designated Bailiff's first day of assignment. Bailiffs, supervisors, and any employee of the Bidder shall be required to wear a Bidder provided photo identification card at all times. to determine whether such bidder is qualified and capable to perform the contract. The pre -award survey will involve examination of the bidder's technical status and bidders understanding of the contract requirements. A. The following are examples of the types of information that, upon request, the bidder shall be prepared to provide to the City in writing, within ten working days of the request: a. Identification of Bidder's personnel and management procedures to be used on this contract, certified private security cards, and statement of compliance with employment requirements, and certification of longevity requirements as set forth in these specifications; b. The Bidder's technical and management plan for performing the required services; c. Description of the Bidder's facilities and equipment; d. Summary of the Bidder's experience in performing work of the type specified herein; e. Present and prior contracts for similar work, and the names and addresses of individuals within the contracting organizations who may be contacted regarding the Bidder's prior performance on similar contracts. B. Failure to provide requested information may result in rejection of bid. After review of the information submitted by the bidder, a determination of the bidder's non -responsibility may result in rejection of bid. SECTION II TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS — MUNICIPAL COURT 1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: The Bidder shall provide the services of Municipal Court Bailiffs and Security Guards, completely outfitted with matching uniforms and all essential equipment, including requisite weapons, deemed by the City as necessary to carry out the duties of Bailiffs and Security Guards for the City of Corpus Christi Municipal Court as specified in Section II, Part 5, of this document, titled Essential Duties and Responsibilities and in compliance with the Section I, Part 7, of this document, titled Licensing and Certifications. The Bailiffs will be Security Officer Commissioned to carry a firearm, commissioned by the Service Contractor, and will carry a weapon while on duty at the Municipal Court_ The Bidder is responsible for providing Bailiffs for the Municipal Court located at 120 N. Chaparral Street, Corpus Christi, Nueees County, Texas, during normal business hours as described in Section 11, Part 3, of this document, titled Hours and Days of Operations. 2. STAFFING REQUIREMENTS: A. The Municipal Court staffing needs are as follows: a. Two Security Guards are required for the check-in process at the first -floor entrance of the Municipal Court by the metal detectors. C tin11...r5.:ltrurEe,._.s£tts. o<s _]. and compliance lobby area. c. Three Bailiffs are required for each of the three Courtrooms during courtroom proceedings. B. Any and all changes to the above must be approved by the Contract Administrator, in advance. 3. HOURS OF OPERATION: The Corpus Christi Municipal Court is open to the public Monday through Friday, during normal business hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m) and during the hours of 8:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday. 4. HOLIDAYS: The City of Corpus Christi recognizes seven holidays. These are New Year's Day; Memorial Day; Independence Day (July 4th); Labor Day; Thanksgiving Day; the Friday after Thanksgiving Day; and Christmas Day. 5. ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: The essential duties and responsibilities for the Municipal Court Bailiffs include, but are not limited to, the following: A. The Bailiffs will provide security to all courtrooms at the Municipal Court. B. The Securtiy Guards will monitor and operate the metal detectors at the entrance of the Municipal Court building and survey the premises in the lobby areas, including the first floor main lobby area, courtroom lobby areas, and the collection and compliance lobby area. All persons entering the Municipal Court must be processed through the metal detectors. C. The Bailiffs will ensure that the courtrooms are open and prepared for court sessions. D. The Bailiffs will adhere to courtroom decorum, while providing safety in the courtrooms, including responding to emergencies and taking necessary action. E. The Bailiffs will assist the Judge in maintaining order in the courtroom and will provide instructions to spectators, jurors, and prospective jurors regarding their conduct in the courtroom. F. The Bailiffs will assist the judges in administering courtroom procedure such as, but not limited to: a. Ensuring all parties and counsel involved in a case are present before proceedings begin; b. Calling cases to be tried and calling witnesses to the stand; c. Escorting jurors to and from the jury box; d. Attending to the needs of the jurors during deliberations; and e. Providing information upon request regarding scheduled court proceedings, jury lists, and other resources as needed by the judges. Such resources may necesitate that the Bailiffs complete and/or review various court -related forms, ensuring said forms are: L Completed properly with dates filled in, A 4,.,+ G. The Bailiffs will escort persons found in contempt of court from the Courtroom and hold them in custody until the person in custody is picked up by a City Marshal. H. The Bailiffs may conduct appropriate follow-up activities with defendants, including taking fingerprints; making copies of financial forms, orders, and judgements. I. The Bailiffs will meet with other Bailiffs periodically regarding courthouse safety and security. J. The Bailiffs must be familiar with the Municipal Court Emergency Procedure as stated in Section II, Part 16, of this specification. K. The Supervising Bailiff will ensure that all duties are performed and all rules and regulations followed by all the Bidder's employees reporting for work at the Municipal Court. The Supervising Bailiff will meet with other Bailiffs, periodically and as needed, regarding safety and security policy and procedures and courtroom processes. The Supervising Bailiff will be available at all times to provide clarification to Bailiffs on security issues, matters of protocol, and to provide disciplinary actions for the Bailiffs on duty. 6. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: The Bidder will prepare and have available the following reports: A. Daily Log -- this report will be a running summary of activities during each work shift. At a minimum, the following items will be noted by the Bailiffs and Securtiy Guards and recorded in the daily log: a. Name and rank of Bailiff or Security Guard b. Time on duty and time off duty c. Area Bailiff or Security Guard is assigned to cover d. Acknowledgment that oncoming Bailiff or Security Guard has read and understands all special instructions for the Muncipal Court e. Any violation of established security rules and any outstanding or significant incidents f. Any staff or patron complaints reported to Bailiff or Security Guard. B. Incident Report -- this report is a detailed accounting of accidents or incidents on Municipal Court premises. An incident report is to be promptly completed and provided to the Contract Administrator, the City Marshal, the City of Corpus Christi Risk Management Department, and the Bidder. Such a report will be completed, in full, by the Bailiff on duty at the time of the incident. Unreported incidents will be deemed a violation of the service provider contract and will be treated accordingly. 7. CONTRACTOR FURNISHED UNIFORMS, EQUIPMENT AND ACCESSORIES: A. The Bidder shall provide Bailiffs with uniforms and is responsible for ensuring that uniforms are kept neat, clean, and properly ironed when worn for duty at the Municipal B. The Bidder shall provide Bailiffs with portable UHF radios and hand-held metal detectors. C. Except for those items expressly noted as provided by the City, the Bidder shall furnish all supplies and equipment required for the execution of the contracted services, including, but not limited to, alarm -monitoring equipment, two (2) two-way portable radios, cellular phone(s), and weapons. D. Contractor -furnished equipment shall be subject to the inspection and approval of the Contract Administrator prior to being placed in service and during the term of this contract. 8. TRAINING: A. The Bidder will provide certification training for each Bailiff in the area of Courtroom. Security and Bailiff duties in the Courtroom. Bidders are encouraged to contact the Texas Municipal Court Education Center (TMCEC) for more information. B. The Bidder will provide proof of training having used Red Cross -Certified First Aid procedures and resuscitation procedures including the use of cardio -pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and Heimlich maneuver for each assigned Bailiff. C. The Bidder will train Bailiffs in the use of communication procedures, including the use of portable two-way radio equipment and cellular telephones. D. The Bidder will make sure all Bailiffs are trained in Police procedures regarding public relations, facility security, personal safety, emergency management, personal assaults, public intoxication, juvenile delinquency, patrolling and surveillance, and reporting techniques. E. The Bidder will make sure all Bailiffs are trained to write and maintain daily reports, including, but not limited to, those detailed in Section H, Part 6, of this document, labeled Reporting Requirements. Bailiffs will be trained to document activities or problems in Municipal Court, as well as, properly complete accident or incident reports covering mishaps, unusual events, unexpected occurrences, and the like. F. All Bailiffs assigned to duty will undergo follow-up training and/or refresher courses in Red Cross -Certified First Aid procedures and resuscitation procedures including the use of cardio -pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and Heimlich maneuver; communication procedures; Police procedures regarding public relations, facility security, personal safety, emergency management, personal assaults, public intoxication, juvenile delinquency, patrolling and surveillance, and reporting techniques; the writing and maintaining of daily reports, including but not limited to, those detailed in Section II, Part 6, of this document, labeled Reporting Requirements; and documenting activities or problems at Municipal Court, as well as, properly completing accident or incident reports covering mishaps, unusual events, unexpected occurrences, and the like. 9. CITY CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR: The City's Contract Administrator is the Director of Municipal Court who shall approve all phases of performance and operations under this Contract, including authorization for payment. The Contract Administrator or his/her designee shall be the single point of contact for the Bidder for all matters. i in iol rIE. TrAr. _L"CtLTTAVGlti[1 1.ITQ• _ . 11. CITY QUALITY ASSURANCE: Bidders are expected to ensure that prior to commencing work under the contract, the Bidder shall meet in conference with the Contract Administrator to develop a mutual understanding relative to this contract and to provide for a smooth assumption of duties. Further meetings between the Bidder and the Contract Administrator will be periodically arranged by the Contract Administrator, as needed. All phases of the services rendered by the Bidder are subject to the inspection and approval of the Contract Administrator. If the Bidder's overall performance is unsatisfactory, the Contract Administrator will so notify the Bidder in writing. A reply to the written notification will be delivered to the Contract Administrator within three (3) working days and will include an outline or plan of corrective action, which must be acceptable to the City Manager or his designee. The Bidder's continued unsatisfactory performance shall be sufficient cause for termination of the service contract. 12. EQUIPMENT PROVIDED BY THE CITY: The City will provide the Bidder a walk-thru metal detector at the main entrance to the Municipal Court. Additional metal detectors will be available, as needed, for use at the entrances of Courtrooms 13 and C. A magnetic access card and one set of keys will be issued to the Bidder. It shall be the Bidder's responsibility to ensure the keys are safeguarded and that the Municipal Court is secured at the end of each business day, at the time specified by the Contract Administrator. The Bidder will be liable for the re -keying, replacing, or otherwise altering of locks and security systems should these locks or systems become compromised as a result of the Bidder's negligence, including, but not limited to, the loss of keys or magnetic access cards 13. BIDDER FURNISHED SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT: The Bidder is responsible for taking action to protect City supplies and equipment and the personal property of its employees from loss, theft, damage, or tampering. The Bailiffs will take care not to allow any damage or destruction to the equipment furnished by the Municipal Court. The Bailiffs are to document any and all incidents to enable prompt and thorough reporting of any damage or destruction that may occur to equipment furnished by the Municipal Court. The Bailiff Supervisor must contact the Contract Administrator immediately upon determining that the equipment furnished by the Municipal Court has malfunctioned and/or is in need of repair. 14. IDENTIFICATION OF BIDDER EMPLOYEES: Alt Bidder employees working as Bailiffs at the Municipal Court or in the direct supervision of Bailiffs under this Contract shall be identified by a distinctive uniform complete with photo badge and name tag identifying each employee individually, as stated in Section 1, Part 7, D, of this document. 15. INVOICING INSTRUCTIONS: Bidder invoices will be submitted to the Contract Administrator within five working days following the end of each calendar month in which services are performed. On verification of the work performed and charges, the Contract Administrator will process the invoices for payment. Any occurrences of violations of Section II, Part 7, J, of this document will be deducted from invoice payment as stipulated in Section II, Part 7, J. 16. EMERGENCY PROCEDURES: Bidder shall be thoroughly familiar with the Municipal Court Emergency Procedures whichrequires that for all security and medical emergencies the Bailiff on duty shall immediately notify the Corpus Christi Police Department by calling 911, reporting the type of emergency and requesting the assitance required. Immediately after calling 911, the Bailiff will notify the City Marshal. Under non -emergency circumstances, when police assistance is Ti,.:1:44"_..1...l1Y.�t���#l.a Attachment B - Schedule of Pricing DEACON 10, LCC dba Premier Protective Services ST. EUCLID, OHIO ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. - 1 YR UNIT 1. Contracted Commissioned Municipal Bailiff Services 2. Security Guards Totals Total Award 6,240 6,240 $160,992.00 HR HR Unit Extended Price Price $12.90 $80,496.00 $12.90 $80,496.00 $160,992.00 Attachment C - Insurance Requirements INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS I. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY INSURANCE A. Contractor must not commence work under this contract until all insurance required has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Contractor must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. B. Contractor must furnish to the City's Risk Manager and Contract Administrator one (1) copy of Certificates of Insurance with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies by endorsement, and a waiver of subrogation by endorsement is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with Certificate of Insurance. Project name anchor number must be listed in Description Box of Certificate of Insurance. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -day advance written notice of cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination required on all certificates and policies. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate Commercial General Liability including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises — Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate POLICE PROFESSIOAL LIABILITY $1,000,000 Per Occurrence AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non -Owned l J - iiv11 Li 4L ort 11V1Y wv J1L1Thi Z (All States Endorsement if Company is not domiciled in Texas) Employer's Liability $500,000 Combined Single Limit F.7LCILL4LJl J [UAL 44.)111j,1114) W 11111 Al 1L L 11 gal L111❑ Exhibit. $500,000/$500,000/$500,000 C. In the event of accidents of any kind related to this contract, Contractor must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. II. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Applicable for paid employees, Contractor must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers' compensation coverage provided must be in an amount sufficient to assure that all workers' compensation obligations incurred by the Contractor will be promptly met. An All States Endorsement shall be required if Contractor is not domiciled in the State of Texas. B. Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Contractor's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. C. Contractor shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement Certificate of Insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of any change made by the Contractor or as requested by the City. Contractor shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Exhibit shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Carpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 D. Contractor agrees that, with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • List the City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, as additional insureds by endorsement with regard to operations, completed operations, and activities of or on behalf of the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; • Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and rcLtcyvat, "ItJaLciial' ciidii6C U1 111 UVciagt. aitu ugh i.c*T illlal uayb advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. E. Within five (5) calendar days of a cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination of coverage, Contractor shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Contractor's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. F. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Contractor's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Contractor to stop work hereunder, andior withhold any payment{s} which become due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. G. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contractor's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this contract_ H. It is agreed that Contractor's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this contract. It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this contract. 2016 Insurance Requirements Municipal Court. Security Guard/Bailiff Service 1/1.2/2016 ds Risk Management AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 17, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 DATE: April 29, 2016 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Miles Risley, City Attorney MilesR@cctexas.com 826-3873 AEP Distribution Cost Recovery Factor CAPTION: Resolution of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas to authorize intervention in the Public Utility Commission of Texas Docket No. 45787 regarding AEP Texas Central Company's application for approval of a distribution cost recovery factor to increase distribution rates within the city; finding that the city's reasonable rate case expenses shall be reimbursed by the company; finding that the meeting at which this resolution is passed is open to the public as required by law; requiring notice of this resolution to the company and legal counsel. PURPOSE: Resolution to intervene in AEP's filing at the Public Utility Commission for a Distribution Cost Recovery Factor BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: On April 6, AEP Texas Central Company filed an Application for approval of a Distribution Cost Recovery Factor to become effective September 2, 2016 Public Utility Commission of Texas Docket 45787. The City has jurisdiction over the application with regard to customers within the municipal boundary. AEP is seeking approval of a cost recovery factor to recover $54,012,978 in invested capital. The proposed tariff would impose a factor on residential customers of $0.002916 per kWh. AEP gives notice of appeal to PUC of any municipal filings and any interim or final orders issued by a municipality's governing body in this matter. Approval of this Resolution authorizes the City to intervene and participate in the matter to review the application with other cities for compliance with applicable distribution cost recovery regulations. ALTERNATIVES: Do no approve the Resolution and do not participate in the case. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Not applicable EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital X Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Comments: RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the Resolution LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS TO AUTHORIZE INTERVENTION IN THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS DOCKET NO. 45787 REGARDING AEP TEXAS CENTRAL COMPANY'S APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A DISTRIBUTION COST RECOVERY FACTOR TO INCREASE DISTRIBUTION RATES WITHIN THE CITY; FINDING THAT THE CITY'S REASONABLE RATE CASE EXPENSES SHALL BE REIMBURSED BY THE COMPANY; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS RESOLUTION IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; REQUIRING NOTICE OF THIS RESOLUTION TO THE COMPANY AND LEGAL COUNSEL. WHEREAS, the City of Corpus Christi, Texas ("City") is an electric utility customer of AEP Texas Central Company ("TCC" or "Company"), and a regulatory authority with an interest in the rates and charges of TCC; and WHEREAS, the City is a member of the Cities Served by AEP TCC ("Steering Committee"), a membership of similarly situated cities served by TCC that have joined together to efficiently and cost effectively review and respond to electric issues affecting rates charged in TCC's service area; and WHEREAS, on or about April 6, 2016 TCC filed with the City an Application for Approval of a Distribution Cost Recovery Factor ("DCRF"), PUC Docket No. 45787, seeking to increase electric distribution rates by $54,012,978; and WHEREAS, all electric utility customers residing in the City who receive their electricity through AEP distribution system will be impacted by this ratemaking proceeding if it is granted; and WHEREAS, the Steering Committee is coordinating its review of TCC's DCRF filing with designated attorneys and consultants NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City is authorized to intervene and participate in the Steering Committee in PUC Docket No. 45787. Section 2. That subject to the right to terminate employment at any time, the City of Corpus Christi, Texas hereby authorizes the hiring of the law firm of Lloyd Gosselink and consultants to negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates, and to direct any necessary administrative proceedings or court litigation associated with an appeal of this application filed with the PUC. Section 3. . That the City's reasonable rate case expenses shall be reimbursed in full by TCC within 30 days of presentation of an invoice to TCC. Section 4. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Resolution is passed is open to the public as required by law and the public notice of the time, place, and purpose of said meeting was given as required. Section 5. That a copy of this Resolution shall be sent to Jay Toungate, American Electric Power Service Corporation, 1201 Elm Street, Suite 800, Dallas, Texas 75270 and to Thomas Brocato, General Counsel to the Steering Committee, at Lloyd Gosselink Rochelle & Townsend, P.C., P.O. Box 1725, Austin, Texas 78767-1725. PASSED AND APPROVED this ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney day of , 2016. Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas of The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Rudy Garza Michael Hunter Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Brian Rosas Lucy Rubio Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughn AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 17, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 DATE: TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager May 3, 2016 FROM: Tom Tagliabue, Director, Intergovernmental Relations tomtag@cctexas.com 361.826.3850 Resolution supporting the approval of bonds and a project relative to Texas A&M University -Corpus Christi CAPTION: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO APPROVE THE ISSUANCE OF (I) THE NEW HOPE CULTURAL EDUCATION FACILITIES FINANCE CORPORATION STUDENT HOUSING REVENUE BONDS (CHF- COLLEGIATE HOUSING ISLAND CAMPUS, L.L.C.-TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY -CORPUS CHRISTI ISLAND CAMPUS PROJECT) SERIES 2016A AND TO APPROVE THE PROJECT TO BE ACQUIRED WITH THE PROCEEDS OF SUCH BONDS, AND (II) THE NEW HOPE CULTURAL EDUCATION FACILITIES FINANCE CORPORATION STUDENT HOUSING REVENUE BONDS (CHF- COLLEGIATE HOUSING CORPUS CHRISTI II, L.L.C.- TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY- CORPUS CHRISTI PROJECT) SERIES 2016A AND TO APPROVE THE PROJECT TO BE ACQUIRED WITH THE PROCEEDS OF SUCH BONDS PURPOSE: In order for the interest on the bonds to be exempt from the holder's income, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Series 2016A bonds and the Project (i.e. student housing) must be approved by the City Council after the publication of Notice of Hearing and the holding of a hearing. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: This would be the third time the City has been asked to approve bonds and projects under Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. On May 13, 2014, the City approved bonds for the student housing on the TAMUCC Momentum Campus. In addition, in 2006, the City Council approved bonds for a non-commercial radio station operated by an educational media foundation. The resolution specifically states the bonds "...shall not constitute obligations of the City or a pledge of its faith and credit, and the City shall not be obligated to pay the Bonds or the interest thereone or otherwise incur any liability in respect thereof." A Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Corpus Christi Caller -Times on April 8, 2016. A Public Hearing relating to the notice was held on April 25, 2016. According to the minutes of the public hearing, no member of the public spoke at the meeting. ALTERNATIVES: Denial of the Resolution OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Not applicable EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal Finance FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue (To fill out chart, see instructions below) ❑ Capital X Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: Not applicable RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Certification Prior City Council Agenda Memo (May 13, 2014) CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO APPROVE THE ISSUANCE OF (I) THE NEW HOPE CULTURAL EDUCATION FACILITIES FINANCE CORPORATION STUDENT HOUSING REVENUE BONDS (CHF- COLLEGIATE HOUSING ISLAND CAMPUS, L.L.C.- TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY- CORPUS CHRISTI ISLAND CAMPUS PROJECT) SERIES 2016A AND TO APPROVE THE PROJECT TO BE ACQUIRED WITH THE PROCEEDS OF SUCH BONDS, AND (II) THE NEW HOPE CULTURAL EDUCATION FACILITIES FINANCE CORPORATION STUDENT HOUSING REVENUE BONDS (CHF- COLLEGIATE HOUSING CORPUS CHRISTI II, L.L.C.- TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY- CORPUS CHRISTI PROJECT) SERIES 2016A AND TO APPROVE THE PROJECT TO BE ACQUIRED WITH THE PROCEEDS OF SUCH BONDS WHEREAS, the New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation (the "Issuer") was created pursuant to the Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation Act, Article 1528m, Vernon's Revised Civil Statutes, as amended (the "Act"), and has the power, authority and rights to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of aiding any accredited institutions of higher education, secondary schools, and primary schools, and authorized charter schools in financing or refinancing educational facilities and housing facilities and facilities that are incidental, subordinate, or related thereto or appropriate in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, CHF -Collegiate Housing Island Campus, L.L.C., a single member Alabama limited liability company (the "Island Campus Borrower'), has requested that the Issuer issue, and the Issuer proposes to approve the issuance of, its Student Housing Revenue Bonds (CHF — Collegiate Housing Island Campus, L.L.C. — Texas A&M University — Corpus Christi Island Campus Project) Series 2016A (the "Island Campus Bonds"), pursuant to the Act and pursuant to a Trust Indenture between the Issuer and Regions Bank, as trustee (the "Island Campus Indenture"), and to loan the proceeds of the Island Campus Bonds to the Island Campus Borrower, pursuant to a Loan Agreement between the Issuer and the Island Campus Borrower (the "Island Campus Loan Agreement') for the purpose of providing funds to finance the cost of acquisition, renovation, furnishing and equipping of approximately 23 student housing buildings containing approximately 1,228 units (approximately 1,790 beds) and various related amenities and improvements to be located on the campus of Texas A&M University -Corpus Christi, to pay certain start-up expenses, to fund a debt service reserve fund for the Island Campus Bonds, and to pay the costs of issuing the Island Campus Bonds (collectively, the "Island Campus Project'); and WHEREAS, CHF — Collegiate Housing Corpus Christi II, L.L.C., a single member Alabama limited liability company (the 'Momentum Borrower"), has requested that the Issuer issue, and the Issuer proposes to approve the issuance of, its Student Housing Revenue Bonds (CHF- Collegiate Housing Corpus Christi II, L.L.C.-Texas A&M University- Corpus Christi Project) Series 2016A (the 'Momentum Bonds" and, together with the Island Campus Bonds, the "Bonds"), pursuant to the Act and pursuant to a Trust Indenture between the Issuer and Regions Bank, as trustee (the 'Momentum Indenture" and, together with the Island Campus Indenture, the Page 1 of 4 "Indentures'), and to loan the proceeds of the Momentum Bonds to the Momentum Borrower, pursuant to a Loan Agreement between the Issuer and the Momentum Borrower (the 'Momentum Loan Agreement" and, together with the Island Campus Loan Agreement, the "Loan Agreements') for the purpose of providing funds to finance the cost of the development, construction, furnishing and equipping of an approximately 560 -bed student housing facility and an approximately 3,800 square foot community center, along with associated site development and various related amenities and improvements to be located on the campus of Texas A&M University -Corpus Christi, to fund interest on the Momentum Bonds, to pay certain start-up expenses, to fund a debt service reserve fund for the Momentum Bonds, and to pay the costs of issuing the Momentum Bonds (collectively, the 'Momentum Project" and, together with the Island Campus Project, the "Projects'); and WHEREAS, Section 147(0 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code'), requires that the Bonds and the Projects be approved by the "applicable elected representative" of the governmental unit in which the Projects are located after a public hearing following reasonable public notice; and WHEREAS, the Mayor of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (the "City") has been requested to approve, as the applicable elected representative of the City, the issuance of the Bonds and the Projects in accordance with the requirements of the Code, and will be furnished with affidavits of publication of notice of such hearings which shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation available to residents within the boundaries of the City and minutes of the public hearings to be conducted in connection therewith once such hearings have been held; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to hereby authorize the Mayor to approve the issuance of the Bonds and the Projects; and WHEREAS, the actions of the Issuer with respect to the Projects and the Bonds (including the issuance of the Bonds and the execution and delivery of the Indentures and Loan Agreements) and the action of the Mayor and the City Council with respect to the matters described herein will create no liability for the City and the City Council desires to authorize the Mayor to execute the required approval in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1 The Mayor of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, is hereby authorized to approve the issuance of the Bonds and the Projects, for the limited purposes stated herein, and to execute and deliver such approval as requested. SECTION 2 The authorization to approve the Bonds and the Projects is made for the sole purpose of satisfying the requirements of Section 147(0 of the Code, and for no other purpose and shall not be construed as a representation, warranty or other undertaking of any kind by the Mayor, the City Page 2 of 4 or the City Council in respect of the Bonds or the Projects. The Bonds shall not constitute obligations of the City or a pledge of its faith and credit, and the City shall not be obligated to pay the Bonds or the interest thereon or otherwise incur any liability in respect thereof. SECTION 3 The Mayor and City Secretary of the City and other officers of the City are hereby authorized to execute and deliver such instruments, certificates or documents necessary or advisable to carry out the intent and purpose of this resolution. SECTION 4 This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage and shall continue in force and effect from the date hereof. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 2016. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta Nelda Martinez City Secretary Mayor Corpus Christi, TX Corpus Christi, TX The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Rudy Garza Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Michael T. Hunter Brian Rosas Lucy Rubio Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughan Page 3 of 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: By: Name: Title: Page 4 of 4 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM February 14, 2006 AGENDA ITEM: A. Public hearing in connection with the issuance by the Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority of its tax exempt obligation for the benefit of the Educational Media Foundation in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $16,500,000. B. Resolution of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas approving the issuance of tax exempt obligation by the Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority for the benefit of Educational Media Foundation as required by Section 147 (f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. ISSUE: The Educational Media Foundation has requested that the City of Corpus Christi authorize a resolution approving the issuance of tax-exempt obligation in the amount of $16,500,000 by the Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority for the benefit of Educational Media Foundation. Section 147(0 of the Internal Revenue Code requires, as a condition to receiving tax-exempt treatment on the obligation, that each governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which any facility with respect to which financing is to be provided from the net proceeds of an issue is located, approve the issue after a public hearing following reasonable public notice. Approximately $350,000 of the proceeds will be used for the benefit of local non-commercial radio station KKLM-FM which is operated by Educational Media Foundation. Approval of this issuance is done solely for the purpose of complying with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code pertaining to tax-exempt status of the issuance, and in no way obligates, or creates or establishes any liability on the part of the city of Corpus Christi with respect to the facility or the obligation. REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of the Resolution as presented. FUNDING: None PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: None. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the Resolution. (Department Head Signature) Attachments: Letter from law firm of Peck, Shaffer & Williams, bond counsel, Resolution approving issuance. „Affic4c Kifes _zz,93 SUITE 84:3 555 17'” STREET DENVER, COLORADO BD202 E''HC!NE 303 2963996 1 877-296-0333 December 16, 2005 Corpus Christi, Texas City Hall — Council Chambers 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas Attention: Lisa Aguilar, Assistant City Attorney Emaillisaa@cctexas.com Re: Educational Media Foundation Ladies and Gentlemen: FAX 303-296 0344 WWW.PECK-BHAFFER.COM Our firm is acting as bond counsel in connection with the proposed issuance of a tax-exempt obligation (the "Obligation") by the Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority, an independent public body public and corporate of the State of Colorado (the "Authority") for the benefit of Educational Media Foundation, a California non profit corporation (the "Borrower") which operates a non-commercial radio station (KKLM-FM) that is licensed to operate in your City. This letter is in response to the request for some background information on the role of City in the transaction. The proceeds of the Obligation will be used for the purposes of: (a) refmancing the cost of acquiring an FCC non-commercial license to operate a radio station that offers contemporary Christian music, public affairs programming, public service announcements and personal counseling by phone to listeners, (b) equipping the radio station which the Borrower will operate, and (c) paying certain costs of issuance of the Obligation, (collectively, the "Project"). You requested we provide a discussion regarding the power of the Authority to issue the Obligation. The Borrower operates nine non-commercial radio stations located in Colorado. The Borrower is an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, based on its educational mission. The Authority is empowered to issue the Obligation for the Project pursuant to C.R.S. 23-15-101 et seq (2004) (the "Act") and specifically is empowered under 23-15-103 (7)(b) to issue the Obligation for the benefit of an educational institution for projects located outside the state, if the Borrower operates educational facilities (as defined in the Act) in Colorado. Since the Borrower is an educational institution (within the meaning of the Act) that operates nine Colorado stations, the Authority can finance a project located outside of Colorado. The Authority. therefore, has the power to issue the Obligation for the Project. Federal tax law also plays a large role in any tax-exempt financing, including this one for the I C A G O, - L L- N O 15 #684v! CINCINNA' O H, U COLUMBUS, OHIO COVINGTON, KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY Yom, City of Corpus Christi, Texas December 13, 2005 Page 2 Borrower. The Borrower needs the assistance of the City to meet one of the tax law requirements. Section 147(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") requires that a public hearing for bonds issued for the benefit of non-profit corporations be held in the local area where the project being fmanced with tax-exempt obligation is located, after the publication of notice in accordance with the Code requirements. Further, the Code requires that a public body like the City Council formally approve the issuance of the Obligation. Thus, the Borrower requests the City to cause the notice to be published, hold a public hearing and pass a resolution approving the Obligation. The public hearing mandated by the Code only requires the City to give interested parties the right to make statements about the Project or the Obligation, and does not require the City to conduct a debate or make a determination on the merits of the Project. The approval given by the City is to merely meet the Code requirements. Further, such actions by the City Council do not obligate the City to make any payments with respect to the Obligation, nor will the Obligation become the indebtedness of the City. We will provide the form of the public notice and the City Council resolution are included with this letter. You asked me to comment on what would occur if Corpus Christi did not hold the hearing. If Corpus Christi does not hold the hearing, the financing costs for EMF will remain at a higher, taxable rate which will limit the Company's ability to provide educational programming to the City. Thank you for your assistance and we are available to answer any questions you might have. We look forward to completing this with you. Very truly yours, 1) Mary L. Groves MLG:lrw #572v2 SUITE 845 555 SEVENTEENTH STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80202-5402 TEL. EE'HE: NE 303-296-3996 877-296-0333 FAX 303-296-0344 WWW.PECK-SHAFFER.COM February 9, 2006 City of Corpus Christi, Texas City Hall - Council Chambers 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas Attention: Lisa Aguilar, Assistant City Attorney Email:lisaa@cctexas.com Re: Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority Tax -Exempt Obligation (Educational Media Foundation) Ladies and Gentlemen: We have acted as bond counsel with respect to the above -captioned Obligation and have rendered our unqualified opinion as bond counsel of even date herewith. You may rely on such opinion as if it were addressed to you. Very truly yours, ATLA NT-+ #775 %.1 GA CHwAGc, IL CINCINNATI, OH COLUMBUS, OH COVINGTON, KY LOUISVILLE, KY Suite 845 Telephone 303 296 0344 February 2006 555 171" Street 1-877-296-0333 Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority 1981 Blake Street Denver, CO 80202 DRAFT 01/06/06 Denver, Colorado 80202 Fax 720-904 9149 www.peck-shaffer.com Re. Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority Tax -Exempt Obligation (Educational Media Foundation) Ladies and Gentlemen: We have acted as bond counsel in connection with the issuance by the Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority (the "Issuer") of its Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority Tax -Exempt Obligation, in the principal amount of $ (the "Obligation"). We have examined the law and such certified proceedings and other papers as deemed necessary to render this opinion. As to questions of fact material to our opinion, we have relied upon representations of the Issuer and of Educational Media Foundation, a California nonprofit corporation (the "Corporation"), contained in the Master Financing Agreement described below, the Issuer's certified proceedings and other certifications of its officials furnished to us, and certifications by the Corporation (including certifications as to the use of Obligation proceeds which are material to the paragraph numbered 4 below), without undertaking to verify the same by independent investigation. We have also relied on continued compliance by the Issuer and the Corporation with their respective covenants contained in the Master Financing Agreement described below relating to the issuance of the Obligation and pertaining to those sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") that affect the exclusion from gross income of interest on the Obligation for Federal and Colorado income tax purposes. Our examination was necessarily limited to the foregoing as they exist or are in effect as of the date hereof. The Obligation is issued pursuant to Article 15, Title 23 of the Colorado Revised Statutes and the Supplemental Public Securities Act, Part 2, Article 57, Title 11 of the Colorado Revised Statutes, a Master Financing Agreement (the "Agreement") between the Issuer, the Corporation and GE Capital Public Finance, Inc. (the "Lender"), and a resolution of the Issuer authorizing the execution and delivery of the Obligation (the "Obligation Resolution"). Proceeds of the Obligation are to be loaned to the Corporation pursuant to the provisions of the Agreement. Atlanta, GA Chicago IL ,1774 F1 Cincinnati. OH Columbus, OH Covington, KY Louisville, KY Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority February . 2006 Page Operation of the assets financed with proceeds of the Obligation will be subject to certain covenants contained in the Agreement. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Corporation has agreed to make payments sufficient to pay when due the principal of and interest on the Obligation. The rights of the Issuer under the Agreement (except certain rights to indemnification, reimbursements, administrative fees and notices and the right to perform certain discretionary acts) are pledged and assigned by the Issuer to the Lender as security for the Obligation. The Obligation is payable solely from such revenues and funds as are pledged and assigned to the payment thereof pursuant to the Agreement. The Obligation bears interest at the rates and matures on the date set forth in the Agreement. The Obligation is subject to prepayment upon certain circumstances, terms and conditions described in the Agreement. Based on our examination described above and in reliance upon the opinion referred to below, we are of the opinion as follows: 1 The Issuer is duly created and validly existing as a public body corporate and politic and instrumentality of the State of Colorado, with the power to enter into and perform its Obligation under the Agreement and to issue the Obligation. The Agreement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Issuer and is the valid and binding obligation of the Issuer enforceable against the Issuer. The Obligation has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Issuer and is the valid. binding, enforceable, special, limited obligation of the Issuer, payable solely from the revenues pledged and assigned to the payment thereof pursuant to the Agreement. �+ Interest on the Obligation is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes under existing law. The Obligation is a "qualified 501(c)(3) Obligation" within the meaning of the Code, and interest on the Obligation is not subject to the alternative minimum tax on individuals and corporations, except that interest on the Obligation will be included in the "adjusted current earnings" of a corporation (other than any S corporation, regulated investment company-. REIT. REMIC or FASIT) for purposes of computing its alternative minimum tax. The opinion set forth above is subject to the condition that the Corporation comply with all requirements of the Code that must be satisfied subsequent to the issuance of the Obligation in order that interests thereon be (or continue to be) excluded from gross income for Federal income tax purposes. The Corporation has covenanted to comply with all such requirements. Failure to comply with certain of such requirements could cause the interest on the Obligation to x774 Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority February .2006 Page 3 be included in gross income retroactive to the date of issuance of the Obligation. We express no opinion regarding other Federal tax consequences arising with respect to the Obligation. 5 Interest on the Obligation is excludable from taxable income for Colorado income tax purposes and from Colorado alternative minimum taxable income under existing law. 6. The Obligation and the interest thereon shall never constitute a general obligation, debt or indebtedness of the Issuer within the meaning of any provision or limitation of the Constitution or statutes of the State of Colorado and shall not constitute or give rise to a pecuniary liability of the Issuer or charge against its general credit or taxing powers, but are payable solely from the revenues pledged and assigned to the payment thereof. In providing such opinions, we have relied on representations of the Issuer, the Corporation, and Coughlin and Company, Inc. (the "Underwriter") with respect to matters solely within the knowledge of the Issuer, the Corporation and the Underwriter, respectively, which we have not independently verified, and have assumed continuing compliance with the covenants in the Agreement pertaining to those sections of the Code that affect the exclusion from gross income of interest on the Obligation for federal income tax purposes. We have further relied on the opinion of The Law Offices of David E. Frank, Auburn, California, counsel to the Corporation, to the effect that the Corporation is exempt from tax pursuant to section 501(a) of the Code by virtue of being an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Code. If such representations are determined to be inaccurate or incomplete, or the Issuer or the Corporation fails to comply with the foregoing covenants of the Agreement, interest on the Obligation could become includable in gross income from the date of its original delivery, regardless of the date on which the event causing such inclusion occurs. Certain requirements and procedures contained or referred to in the Agreement and other relevant documents may be changed and certain actions may be taken or omitted under the circumstances and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in such documents, upon the advice or with an approving opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel. No opinion is expressed herein as to the Obligation or the interest thereon on or after such change that occurs or action that is taken or omitted upon the advice or approval of counsel other than ourselves. Except as stated above, we express no opinion as to any federal, state or local tax consequences resulting from the receipt or accrual of interest on, or acquisition, ownership or disposition of, the Obligation. #7-4 vl Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority February , 2006 Page 4 Owners of the Obligation should be aware that the ownership of tax-exempt bond may result in collateral federal income tax consequences to financial institutions, life insurance and property and casualty insurance companies, certain S corporations with Subchapter C earnings and profits, individual recipients of Social Security or Railroad Retirement benefits, taxpayers who may be deemed to have incurred or continued indebtedness to purchase or carry tax-exempt bonds, taxpayers owning an interest in a FASIT that holds tax-exempt bonds and individuals otherwise qualifying for the earned income credit. In addition, certain foreign corporations doing business in the United States may be subject to the "branch profits tax" on their effectively -connected earnings and profits (including tax-exempt interest such as interest on the Obligation). We express no opinion as to the status of the Obligation under the "Blue Sky" or legal investment laws of any state jurisdiction, or as to any information prepared in connection with the offer or sale of the Obligation. It is to be understood thai the rights of the holders of the Obligation and the enforceability of the Obligation and the Agreement may be subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and other similar laws affecting creditors' rights heretofore or hereafter enacted to the extent constitutionally applicable, and that their enforcement may be subject to the exercise of judicial discretion in accordance with general principles of equity, and may be limited by the reasonable exercise of the police power of the State of Colorado and by the exercise of the powers delegated to the l'nited States of America by the Federal Constitution. The opinions set forth above are based on existing law, which is subject to change. Such opinions are further based on our knowledge of facts as of the date hereof. We assume no duty to update or supplement these opinions to reflect any facts or circumstances that may hereafter come to our attention or to reflect any changes in any law that may hereafter occur or become effective Very truly yours, #774 vi RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF TAX EXEMPT OBLIGATION BY THE COLORADO EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 147 (F) OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986, AS AMENDED. WHEREAS, Educational Media Foundation, a California nonprofit corporation which operates a non-commercial radio station (KKLM-FM) located at 410 S. Padre Island Drive, Suite 207, Corpus Christi, Texas (the "Borrower") has requested the Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority (the "Issuer") to issue its Tax -Exempt Obligation for the benefit of the Borrower, in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $16,500,000 (the "Obligation"); and WHEREAS, the proceeds of the Obligation will be used for the purposes of: (a) refinancing the cost of acquiring an FCC non-commercial license to operate a radio station assigned to Corpus Christi, Texas by the FCC that offers contemporary Christian music, public affairs programming, public service announcements and personal counseling by phone to listeners. (b) equipping the radio station which the Borrower will operate, and (c) paying certain osts of issuance of the Obligation. WHEREAS, in order to achieve interest savings, the Borrower desires that the Obligation be issued in compliance with the requirement of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ( the "Code") so that interest on the Obligation will be excludable from the gross income of the holders; and WHEREAS, Section 147 (0 of the Code requires, as a condition to receiving tax-exempt treatment of the interest on the Obligation, that an authorized, elected representative approve the Obligation and the City Council of Corpus Christi (the "Council") constitutes such an authorized, elected representative: and WHEREAS, it is deemed necessary and advisable that this Resolution be adopted; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The issuance of the Obligation by the Issuer in an aggregate amount not to exceed $16,500.000 is hereby approved. Section 2: Such approval shall be solely for the purposes of Section 147 (f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, shall have no liabilities for the payment of the Obligation nor shall any of its assets be pledged to the payment of the Obligation. Section 3: In providing this approval, the City makes no representations with respect to any of the projects to he financed with the proceeds of the Bonds, specifically, but not by way of =685 limitation, with respect to any projects outside the City of Corpus Christi which are to be financed with approximately $16.150,000 of the proceeds of the Bonds, of which the City has no knowledge. Section 4: This Resolution shall take effect and be in full force immediately after its adoption by the Council. THIS RESOLUTION HAVING BEEN DULY CONSIDERED AND VOTED UPON WAS PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2006. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS ATTES"1 By: City Clerk APPROVED: February 9, 2006. B 1 isa Aguilar Assistant City Attorney for City Attorney , Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas of , 2006 The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Henry Garrett Brent Chesney Melody Cooper Henry Garrett Bill Kelly Rex A. Kinnison John E. Marez Jesse Noyola Mark Scott 3 668' v2 20 IRC Sec. 147 Current through PL 114-143, approved 4/11/16 IRC > INTERNAL REVENUE CODE > SUBTITLE A. INCOME TAXES > CHAPTER 1. NORMAL TAXES AND SURTAXES > SUBCHAPTER B. COMPUTATION OF TAXABLE INCOME > PART IV. TAX EXEMPTION REQUIREMENTS FOR STATE AND LOCAL BONDS > SUBPART A. PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS § 147. Other requirements applicable to certain private activity bonds. (a) Substantial user requirement. (1)In general. Except as provided in subsection (h), a private activity bond shall not be a qualified bond for any period during which it is held by a person who is a substantial user of the facilities or by a related person of such a substantial user. (2)Related person. For purposes of paragraph (1), the following shall be treated as related persons -- (A)2 or more persons if the relationship between such persons would result in a disallowance of losses under section 267 or 707(b) [/RC Sec. 267 or 707(b)], (B)2 or more persons which are members of the same controlled group of corporations (as defined in section 1563(a) [IRC Sec. 1563(a)], except that "more than 50 percent" shall be substituted for "at least 80 percent" each place it appears therein), (C)a partnership and each of its partners (and their spouses and minor children), and (D)an S corporation and each of its shareholders (and their spouses and minor children). (b) Maturity may not exceed 120 percent of economic life. (1)General rule. Except as provided in subsection (h), a private activity bond shall not be a qualified bond if it is issued as part of an issue and-- (A)the average maturity of the bonds issued as part of such issue, exceeds (B)120 percent of the average reasonably expected economic life of the facilities being financed with the net proceeds of such issue. (2)Determination of averages. For purposes of paragraph (1)-- (A)the average maturity of any issue shall be determined by taking into account the respective issue prices of the bonds issued as part of such issue, and (B)the average reasonably expected economic life of the facilities being financed with any issue shall be determined by taking into account the respective cost of such facilities. (3)Special rules. (A)Determination of economic life. For purposes of this subsection, the reasonably expected economic life of any facility shall be determined as of the later of-- (i)the date on which the bonds are issued, or (ii)the date on which the facility is placed in service (or expected to be placed in service). (B)Treatment of land. (i)Land not taken into account. Except as provided in clause (ii), land shall not be taken into account under paragraph (1)(B). Page 2 of 7 IRC Sec. 147 (ii)Issues where 25 percent or more of proceeds used to finance land. If 25 percent or more of the net proceeds of any issue is to be used to finance land, such land shall be taken into account under paragraph (1)(B) and shall be treated as having an economic life of 30 years. (4)Special rule for pooled financing of 501(c)(3) organization. (A)In general. At the election of the issuer, a qualified 501(c)(3) bond shall be treated as meeting the requirements of paragraph (1) if such bond meets the requirements of subparagraph (B). (B)Requirements. A qualified 501(c)(3) bond meets the requirements of this subparagraph if -- (i)95 percent or more of the net proceeds of the issue of which such bond is a part are to be used to make or finance loans to 2 or more 501(c)(3) organizations or governmental units for acquisition of property to be used by such organizations, (ii)each loan described in clause (i) satisfies the requirements of paragraph (1) (determined by treating each loan as a separate issue), (iii)before such bond is issued, a demand survey was conducted which shows a demand for financing greater than an amount equal to 120 percent of the lendable proceeds of such issue, and (iv)95 percent or more of the net proceeds of such issue are to be loaned to 501(c)(3) organizations or governmental units within 1 year of issuance and, to the extent there are any unspent proceeds after such 1 -year period, bonds issued as part of such issue are to be redeemed as soon as possible thereafter (and in no event later than 18 months after issuance).A bond shall not meet the requirements of this subparagraph if the maturity date of any bond issued as part of such issue is more than 30 years after the date on which the bond was issued (or, in the case of a refunding or series of refundings, the date on which the original bond was issued). (5)Special rule for certain FHA insured loans. Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any bond issued as part of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds of which are to be used to finance mortgage loans insured under FHA242 or under a similar Federal Housing Administration program (as in effect on the date of the enactment of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 [enacted Oct. 22, 1986]) where the loan term approved by such Administration plus the maximum maturity of debentures which could be issued by such Administration in satisfaction of its obligations exceeds the term permitted under paragraph (1). (c) Limitation on use for land acquisition. (1)In general. Except as provided in subsection (h), a private activity bond shall not be a qualified bond if-- (A)it is issued as part of an issue and 25 percent or more of the net proceeds of such issue are to be used (directly or indirectly) for the acquisition of land (or an interest therein), or (B)any portion of the proceeds of such issue is to be used (directly or indirectly) for the acquisition of land (or an interest therein) to be used for farming purposes. (2)Exception for first-time farmers. (A)In general [Caution: For calendar years beginning in 2016, see § 3.21 of Rev. Proc. 2015-53 (26 USCS § 1 note) for provision that the loan limit amount under this subparagraph for first time farmers is $ 520,000.]. If the requirements of subparagraph (B) are met with respect to any land, paragraph (1) shall not apply to such land, and subsection (d) shall not apply to property to be used thereon for farming purposes, but only to the extent of expenditures (financed with the proceeds of the issue) not in excess of $ 450,000. (B)Acquisition by first-time farmers. The requirements of this subparagraph are met with respect to any land if-- Page 3 of 7 IRC Sec. 147 (i)such land is to be used for farming purposes, and (ii)such land is to be acquired by an individual who is a first-time farmer, who will be the principal user of such land, and who will materially and substantially participate on the farm of which such land is a part in the operation of such farm. (C)First-time farmer. For purposes of this paragraph-- (i)In general. The term "first-time farmer" means any individual if such individual-- (I)has not at any time had any direct or indirect ownership interest in substantial farmland in the operation of which such individual materially participated, and (II)has not received financing under this paragraph in an amount which, when added to the financing to be provided under this paragraph, exceeds the amount in effect under subparagraph (A). (ii)Aggregation rules. Any ownership or material participation, or financing received, by an individual's spouse or minor child shall be treated as ownership and material participation, or financing received, by the individual. (iii)Insolvent farmer. For purposes of clause (i), farmland which was previously owned by the individual and was disposed of while such individual was insolvent shall be disregarded if section 108 [IRC Sec. 108] applied to indebtedness with respect to such farmland. (D)Farm. For purposes of this paragraph, the term "farm" has the meaning given such term by section 6420(c)(2) [IRC Sec. 6420(c)(2)]. (E)Substantial farmland. For purposes of this paragraph, the term "substantial farmland" means any parcel of land unless such parcel is smaller than 30 percent of the median size of a farm in the county in which such parcel is located. (F)Used equipment limitation. For purposes of this paragraph, in no event may the amount of financing provided by reason of this paragraph to a first-time farmer for personal property-- (i)of a character subject to the allowance for depreciation, (ii)the original use of which does not begin with such farmer, and (iii)which is to be used for farming purposes,exceed $ 62,500. A rule similar to the rule of subparagraph (C)(ii) shall apply for purposes of the preceding sentence. (G)Acquisition from related person. For purposes of this paragraph and section 144(a) [IRC Sec. ], the acquisition by a first-time farmer of land or personal property from a related person (within the meaning of section 144(a)(3) [IRC Sec. 144(a)(3)]) shall not be treated as an acquisition from a related person, if-- (i)the acquisition price is for the fair market value of such land or property, and (ii)subsequent to such acquisition, the related person does not have a financial interest in the farming operation with respect to which the bond proceeds are to be used. (H)Adjustments for inflation. In the case of any calendar year after 2008, the dollar amount in subparagraph (A) shall be increased by an amount equal to-- (i)such dollar amount, multiplied by (ii)the cost -of -living adjustment determined under section 1(f)(3) [/RC Sec. 1(f)(3)] for the calendar year, determined by substituting "calendar year 2007" for "calendar year 1992" in subparagraph (B) thereof.lf any amount as increased under the preceding sentence is not a multiple of $ 100, such amount shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $ 100. Page 4 of 7 IRC Sec. 147 (3)Exception for certain land acquired for environmental purposes, etc. Any land acquired by a governmental unit (or issuing authority) in connection with an airport, mass commuting facility, high-speed intercity rail facility, dock, or wharf shall not be taken into account under paragraph (1) if-- (A)such land is acquired for noise abatement or wetland preservation, or for future use as an airport, mass commuting facility, high-speed intercity rail facility, dock, or wharf, and (B)there is not other significant use of such land. (d) Acquisition of existing property not permitted. (1)In general. Except as provided in subsection (h), a private activity bond shall not be a qualified bond if issued as part of an issue and any portion of the net proceeds of such issue is to be used for the acquisition of any property (or an interest therein) unless the 1st use of such property is pursuant to such acquisition. (2)Exception for certain rehabilitations. Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to any building (and the equipment therefor) if-- (A)the rehabilitation expenditures with respect to such building, equal or exceed (B)15 percent of the portion of the cost of acquiring such building (and equipment) financed with the net proceeds of the issue.A rule similar to the rule of the preceding sentence shall apply in the case of structures other than a building except that subparagraph (B) shall be applied by substituting "100 percent" for "15 percent". (3)Rehabilitation expenditures. For purposes of this subsection-- (A)In general. Except as provided in this paragraph, the term "rehabilitation expenditures" means any amount properly chargeable to capital account which is incurred by the person acquiring the building for property (or additions or improvements to property) in connection with the rehabilitation of a building. In the case of an integrated operation contained in a building before its acquisition, such term includes rehabilitating existing equipment in such building or replacing it with equipment having substantially the same function. For purposes of this subparagraph, any amount incurred by a successor to the person acquiring the building or by the seller under a sales contract with such person shall be treated as incurred by such person. (B)Certain expenditures not included. The term "rehabilitation expenditures" does not include any expenditure described in section 47(c)(2)(B) [IRC Sec. 47(c)(2)(8)]. (C)Period during which expenditures must be incurred. The term "rehabilitation expenditures" shall not include any amount which is incurred after the date 2 years after the later of-- (i)the date on which the building was acquired, or (ii)the date on which the bond was issued. (4)Special rule for certain projects. In the case of a project involving 2 or more buildings, this subsection shall be applied on a project basis. (e) No portion of bonds may be issued for skyboxes, airplanes, gambling establishments, etc. A private activity bond shall not be a qualified bond if issued as part of an issue and any portion of the proceeds of such issue is to be used to provide any airplane, skybox or other private luxury box, health club facility, facility primarily used for gambling, or store the principal business of which is the sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off premises. The preceding sentence shall not apply to any fixed -wing aircraft equipped for, and exclusively dedicated to providing, acute care emergency medical services (within the meaning of section 4261(g)(2) [IRC Sec. 4261(g)(2)]). (f) Public approval required for private activity bonds. (1)In general. A private activity bond shall not be a qualified bond unless such bond satisfies the requirements of paragraph (2). Page 5 of 7 IRC Sec. 147 (2)Public approval requirement. (A)In general. A bond shall satisfy the requirements of this paragraph if such bond is issued as a part of an issue which has been approved by-- (i)the governmental unit-- (I)which issued such bond, or (II)on behalf of which such bond was issued, and (ii)each governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which any facility, with respect to which financing is to be provided from the net proceeds of such issue, is located (except that if more than 1 governmental unit within a State has jurisdiction over the entire area within such State in which such facility is located, only 1 such unit need approve such issue). (B)Approval by a governmental unit. For purposes of subparagraph (A), an issue shall be treated as having been approved by any governmental unit if such issue is approved-- (i)by the applicable elected representative of such governmental unit after a public hearing following reasonable public notice, or (ii)by voter referendum of such governmental unit. (C)Special rules for approval of facility. If there has been public approval under subparagraph (A) of the plan for financing a facility, such approval shall constitute approval under subparagraph (A) for any issue-- (i)which is issued pursuant to such plan within 3 years after the date of the 1st issue pursuant to the approval, and (ii)all or substantially all of the proceeds of which are to be used to finance such facility or to refund previous financing under such plan. (D)Refunding bonds. No approval under subparagraph (A) shall be necessary with respect to any bond which is issued to refund (other than to advance refund) a bond approved under subparagraph (A) (or treated as approved under subparagraph (C)) unless the average maturity date of the issue of which the refunding bond is a part is later than the average maturity date of the bonds to be refunded by such issue. For purposes of the preceding sentence, average maturity shall be determined in accordance with subsection (b)(2)(A). (E)Applicable elected representative. For purposes of this paragraph-- (i)In general. The term "applicable elected representative" means with respect to any governmental unit-- (I)an elected legislative body of such unit, or (II)the chief elected executive officer, the chief elected State legal officer of the executive branch, or any other elected official of such unit designated for purposes of this paragraph by such chief elected executive officer or by State law.lf the office of any elected official described in subclause (II) is vacated and an individual is appointed by the chief elected executive officer of the governmental unit and confirmed by the elected legislative body of such unit (if any) to serve the remaining term of the elected official, the individual so appointed shall be treated as the elected official for such remaining term. (ii)No applicable elected representative. If (but for this clause) a governmental unit has no applicable elected representative, the applicable elected representative for purposes of clause (i) shall be the applicable elected representative of the governmental unit- (I)which is the next higher governmental unit with such a representative, and Page 6 of 7 IRC Sec. 147 (II)from which the authority of the governmental unit with no such representative is derived. (3)Special rule for approval of airports or high-speed intercity rail facilities. If-- (A)the proceeds of an issue are to be used to finance a facility or facilities located at an airport or high-speed intercity rail facilities, and (B)the governmental unit issuing such bonds is the owner or operator of such airport or high-speed intercity rail facilities,such governmental unit shall be deemed to be the only governmental unit having jurisdiction over such airport high-speed intercity rail facilities for purposes of this subsection. (4)Special rules for scholarship funding bond issues and volunteer fire department bond issues. (A)Scholarship funding bonds. In the case of a qualified scholarship funding bond, any governmental unit which made a request described in section 150(d)(2)(B) [IRC Sec. 150(d)(2)(8)] with respect to the issuer of such bond shall be treated for purposes of paragraph (2) of this subsection as the governmental unit on behalf of which such bond was issued. Where more than one governmental unit within a State has made a request described in section 150(d)(2)(B) [ Sec. 150(d)(2)(8)], the State may also be treated for purposes of paragraph (2) of this subsection as the governmental unit on behalf of which such bond was issued. (B)Volunteer fire department bonds. In the case of a bond of a volunteer fire department which meets the requirements of section 150(e) [IRC Sec. 150(e)], the political subdivision described in section 150(e)(2)(B) [IRC Sec. 150(e)(2)(8)] with respect to such department shall be treated for purposes of paragraph (2) of this subsection as the governmental unit on behalf of which such bond was issued. (g) Restriction on issuance costs financed by issue. (1)In general. A private activity bond shall not be a qualified bond if the issuance costs financed by the issue (of which such bond is a part) exceed 2 percent of the proceeds of the issue. (2)Special rule for small mortgage revenue bond issues. In the case of an issue of qualified mortgage bonds or qualified veterans' mortgage bonds, paragraph (1) shall be applied by substituting "3.5 percent" for "2 percent" if the proceeds of the issue do not exceed $ 20,000,000. (h) Certain rules not to apply to certain bonds. (1)Mortgage revenue bonds and qualified student loan bonds. Subsections (a), (b), (c), and (d) shall not apply to any qualified mortgage bond, qualified veterans' mortgage bond, or qualified student loan bond. (2)Qualified 501(c)(3) bonds. Subsections (a), (c), and (d) shall not apply to any qualified 501(c)(3) bond and subsection (e) shall be applied as if it did not contain "health club facility" with respect to such a bond. (3)Exempt facility bonds for qualified public-private schools. Subsection (c) shall not apply to any exempt facility bond issued as part of an issue described in section 142(a)(13) [IRC Sec. 142(a)(13)] (relating to qualified public educational facilities). History (Added Oct. 22, 1986,P.L. 99-514, Title XIII, § 1301(b), 100 Stat. 2635; Nov. 10, 1988,P.L. 100-647, Title I, § 1013(a)(11) -(13)(B), (29), (36), Title VI, § 6180(b)(4), (5), 102 Stat. 3539, 3543, 3544, 3728; Dec. 19, 1989, PL. 101-239, Title VII, § 7816(s)(3), 103 Stat. 2423; Nov. 5, 1990, P.L. 101-508, Title XI, § 11813(b)(8), 104 Stat. 1388-552; Aug. 20, 1996, P.L. 104-188, Title I, § 1117(a), (b), 110 Stat. 1764; June 7, 2001, P.L. 107-16, Title Page 7of7 IRC Sec. 147 IV, § 422(d), (e), 115 Stat. 66; May 22, 2008, P.L. 110-234, Title XV, Subtitle C, Part III, § 15341(a) -(d), 122 Stat. 1517; June 18, 2008, P.L. 110-246, § 4(a), Title XV, Subtitle C, Part III, § 15341(a) -(d), 122 Stat. 1664, 2279; Feb. 14, 2012, P.L. 112-95, Title XI, § 1105(a), .) INTERNAL REVENUE CODE Copyright © 2016 Matthew Bender & Company, Inc. a member of the LexisNexis Group TM All rights reserved. CERTIFICATE OF THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS The undersigned Mayor of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, (the "City") hereby certifies with respect to the issuance by the New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation (the "Corporation") of its Student Housing Revenue Bonds (CHF — Collegiate Housing Island Campus, L.L.C. — Texas A&M University — Corpus Christi Island Campus Project) Series 2016A (the "Bonds"), that: 1. This certificate is based upon the CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC HEARING OFFICER REGARDING PUBLIC HEARING attached hereto as Exhibit A relating to the public hearing conducted on April 25, 2016, by the duly appointed hearing officer of the Corporation in accordance with the requirements of Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"); and 2. Solely for purposes of the approval requirements of the aforesaid Section 147(f) of the Code, and for no other purposes, in my capacity as Mayor, I hereby approve the Bonds and the facilities to be financed with the proceeds of the Bonds; provided, however, THAT THIS APPROVAL SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS (1) A REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY BY THE CITY, THE MAYOR OF THE CITY, THE STATE OF TEXAS OR ANY OTHER AGENCY, INSTRUMENTALITY OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF TEXAS THAT THE BONDS WILL BE PAID OR THAT ANY OBLIGATIONS ASSUMED BY ANY OF THE PARTIES UNDER THE INSTRUMENTS DELIVERED IN CONNECTION WITH THE BONDS WILL IN FACT BE PERFORMED; (2) A PLEDGE OF FAITH AND CREDIT OF THE CITY OR THE STATE OF TEXAS OR ANY AGENCY, INSTRUMENTALITY OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF TEXAS OR THE CITY; OR (3) A REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY BY THE CITY CONCERNING THE VALIDITY OF THE CORPORATE EXISTENCE OF THE CORPORATION OR THE VALIDITY OF THE BONDS. Mayor, City of Corpus Christi Date: , 2016 EXHIBIT A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC HEARING OFFICER REGARDING PUBLIC HEARING Re: New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation Student Housing Revenue Bonds (CHF — Collegiate Housing Island Campus, L.L.C.— Texas A&M University— Corpus Christi Project) Series 2016A The undersigned, Terry Tatum, designated Hearing Officer of New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation (the "Issuer"), the Issuer of the above -referenced bonds (the "Bonds"), called the Public Hearing of the Issuer held in Room 127 of the Harte Research Institute, 6300 Ocean Drive, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412, on April 25, 2016 to order at 4:00 p.m. I declared that a Public Hearing required under Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 was open for purposes of discussing the Bonds and the projects to be financed, refinanced or constructed with the proceeds of the Bonds (the "Projects") by CHF — Collegiate Housing Island Campus, L.L.C., an Alabama limited liability company. I declared that the required notice of the Public Hearing for the Projects was published in the Corpus Christi Caller -Times, being a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as evidenced by an Affidavit of Publication attached hereto as Schedule I. I proceeded to hold the Public Hearing. No member of the public attended the Public Hearing and thus no comments were made or discussed about the Projects or the Bonds. After sufficient time was given for any member of the public to make their comments with respect to the Bonds and the Projects, I declared the Public Hearing closed at 4:15 p.m. DATED: April 25, 2016. Terry Tatum, Hearing Officer New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation SCHEDULE I Affidavit Of Publication [attached hereto] AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION BEFORE ME, a notary public in and for the above named County, on this day personally appeared the person whose name is subscribed below, who, having been duly sworn, says upon oath that he or she is a duly authorized officer or employee of the Corpus Christi Caller Times, which is a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, devoting not less than 25% of its total column lineage to the carrying of items of general interest, published not less frequently than once each week, entered as second-class postal matter in the county where published, and having been published regularly and continuously for not less than 12 months prior to the making of any publication; and that a true and correct copy of the NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, a clipping of which is attached to this Affidavit, was published in said Newspaper on April 8, 2016. 2016. Authorized Officer or Employee SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME on the ifq day Notary Public CORPUS CHRISTI (tatteM I1tto Sales Rep: Georgia Lawson (C9190) caHercom Phone: (361) 886-4307 > Account Information Date: 04/05/16 Account Number: 825296 0 Company Name: JONI WALLACE Contact Name: Email: jwallace@mphlegal.com Address: 717 N. HARWOOD, SUITE 900, DALLAS, TX, 75201 Phone: (214) 754-9280 Fax: Email: georgia.lawson@caller.com > insertion Information This is a proof of your ad scheduled to run on the dates indicated below. Please confine placement prior to deadline by contacting your account rep at (361) 886-4307 . Ad Id: 1028933 P.O. Number: Total Cost: $339.45 Tag Line: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The New Hop Start Date: 04/08/16 Stop Date: 04/08/16 Number of Times: 1 Class: 16130 - Legals Publications: CC -Corpus Christi Caller -Times, CC -Internet - caller.com >Ad Proof I agree this ad is accurate and as ordered. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The New Hope Cultural Edu- cation Facilities Finance Corporation (the "Issuer") will hold a public hearing at 4:00 p.m. on April 25, 2016 in Room 127 of the Harte Research Institute, 6300 Ocean Drive, Corpus Chris- ti, Texas 78412. Among items to be discussed will be a proposal for issuance by the Issuer of its Student Housing Revenue Bonds (the "Bonds"), which will be issued in one or more series in an aggregate prin- cipal amount not to exceed 3100,000,000. The Bonds will be issued to provide funds to finance the cost of the acquisition, renova- tion, furnishing and equip- ping of approximately 23 student housing buildings containing approximately 1,228 units and including the related facilities on the property and various relat- ed amenities and improve- ments and other education- al facilities, to fund interest on the Bonds, to fund cer- tain start-up costs, to fund a debt service reserve fund for the Bonds, and to pay the costs of issuing the Bonds (collectively, the "Project"). The Project will be owned by CHF - Collegiate Hous- ing Island Campus, L.L.C., an Alabama limited liability cornpanyof which pis Collethe giate House - ing Foundation, an organi- zation described in Section 500(0)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"), and managed by American Campus Commu- nities, Inc. or a controlled affiliate of American Cam- pus Communities, Inc. The Project is located on the island campus of Texas A&M University -Corpus Christi at or adjacent to 6515 Ocean Drive, Corpus Chris- ti Texas 78412. Members of the public may attend or submit written comments prior to the hearing regard - ng the Project or the Bonds to the Issuer c/0 Joseph E. Eckert, McCall, Parkhurst & Horton L.L.P., 717 North Harwood, Suite 900, Dallas, Texas 75201. This notice is published and the hearing is to be held to satisfy the requirements of section 147(0 of the Code. Thank you for your business. Our commitment to a quality product includes the advertising in our publications. As such, Journal Mcdia Group reserves the right to categorize, edit and refuse certain classified ads. Your satisfaction is important. If you notice errors in your ad, please notify the classified department immediately so that we can make corrections before the second print date. The number to call is 361-883-1111. Allowance may not be made for errors re- ported past the second print date. The Corpus Christi Caller -Times may not issue refunds for classified advertising purchased in a package rate; ads purchased on the open rate may be pro -rated for the remaining full days for which the ad did not run. Texas A&M University -Corpus Christi Bonds Residential Housing Council Presentation May 17, 2016 What TAMUCC is asking City to do APPROVE THE ISSUANCE OF (I) Student Housing Revenue Bonds And The Project To Be Acquired With The Proceeds Of Such Bonds (i.e. existing housing on Ward Island Campus) AND (II) Student Housing Revenue Bonds And The Project To Be Acquired With The Proceeds Of Such Bonds (i.e. new housing on Momentum Campus) NOTE: On May 13, 2014, the City approved bonds for the student housing on the TAMUCC Momentum Campus Internal Revenue Code In order for the interest on the bonds to be exempt from the holder's income, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 requires that the Series 2016A Bonds and the Projects (i.e. student housing) must be approved by the City Council or highest elected official of the City after the publication of Notice of Hearing and the holding of a hearing. No City Obligation "(Bonds)...shall not constitute obligations of the City or a pledge of its faith and credit, and the City shall not be obligated to pay the Bonds or the interest thereone or otherwise incur any liability in respect thereof." Ward Island/Main Campus Approximately 1,790 beds Bonds not to exceed $100,000,000 Momentum Campus ISMS Tntrn.m.o.T,IA.,!E7 A—friso_ 0 1 ME PLAN w.Rqu.ryApprara, Perm,tingorGonstri.n. Approximately 560 beds Bonds Not to exceed $48,000,000 Dukfcc...mumaa,.., AGENDA MEMORANDUM Public Hearing and First Reading for the City Council Meeting of May 17, 2016 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 DATE: May 2, 2016 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Daniel McGinn, AICP CFM, Interim Director, Development Services Department DanielMc@cctexas.com (361) 826-3595 Proposed Amendment to Mobility CC — Adoption of the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization Strategic Plan for Active Mobility (Phase 1: Bicycle Mobility Plan) CAPTION: Ordinance amending MobilityCC, a transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Corpus Christi, by adopting the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) Strategic Plan for Active Mobility, Phase 1: Bicycle Mobility Plan; providing for severance; providing for a repealer clause; and providing for publication. PURPOSE: The Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization's (CCMPO) 2005 Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan is the current plan identifying the bicycle and pedestrian network adopted by the City. This ordinance amendment would modify MobilityCC by replacing the CCMPO's 2005 Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan with the Strategic Plan for Active Mobility (Phase 1: Bicycle Mobility Plan). BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: In 2013 the City adopted MobilityCC which consolidated existing transportation related plans into a single transportation planning framework. MobilityCC serves as the transportation element of the City's Comprehensive Plan and allows a process for design, operation and maintenance of existing and proposed transportation infrastructure. Existing plans that were incorporated and modified by Mobility CC include the following: • Urban Transportation Plan (UTP) — City's Thoroughfare Plan (Roadway Classification) • ADA Master Plan — City's Accessible Route Master Plan • HikeBikeCC — City's Trails Master Plan for Off -Road Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities • CCMPO 2005 Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan — City's On -Street Bicycle Facilities Master Plan To address the ever-changing transportation network, the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization's (CCMPO) initiated the Strategic Plan for Active Mobility to coordinate and fund transportation projects for both bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The Bicycle Mobility Plan, which is the first phase of the Strategic Plan for Active Mobility, fosters bicycling as a meaningful transportation alternative for riders of diverse abilities. It integrates bicycle mobility for on -street and off-street bicyclists. The Bicycle Mobility Plan serves as a guide to determine where the City should strategically plan for investments in bicycle infrastructure. The prescribed Bicycle Mobility Network (290 miles) has various prescriptions for the type of bicycle infrastructure to be installed (i.e., bike boulevard, buffered bike lane, multi -use side path, one-way cycle track, and off- road multi -use trail). The Bicycle Mobility Plan includes best practices to develop this Bicycle Mobility Network. Adoption of the Strategic Plan for Active Mobility (Phase 1: Bicycle Mobility Plan) requires amending Mobility CC to repeal the 2005 Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan on the Urban Transportation Plan map and modification to HikeBikeCC. Deletion of the 2005 Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan and its replacement with the Strategic Plan for Active Mobility (Phase 1: Bicycle Mobility Plan) allows for the adoption of an improved Bicycle Mobility Network for the City. HikeBikeCC contains prescriptions for trails and/or bikeways, which conflict with the bicycle infrastructure types outlined in the Strategic Plan for Active Mobility (Phase 1: Bicycle Mobility Plan). Therefore, this proposed ordinance amendment would repeal only the conflicting provisions of HikeBikeCC in MobilityCC. The City Traffic Engineer recommended approval of the adoption of the Strategic Plan for Active Mobility (Phase 1: Bicycle Mobility Plan) to the City Transportation Advisory Commission (CTAC). At its monthly meeting on February 22, 2016, CTAC recommended its approval to City Council. The City's Park and Recreation Advisory Committee also passed a resolution of support on March 9, 2016. Planning Commission recommended approval of the Strategic Plan for Active Mobility (Phase 1: Bicycle Mobility Plan) excluding the Matrix of Best Practices at the March 23, 2016 meeting. ALTERNATIVES: Denial or amendment of the Strategic Plan for Active Mobility (Phase 1: Bicycle Mobility Plan). OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This amendment conforms to City Policy. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Street Operations, Engineering Services, Parks & Recreation, Development Services, Legal, and Planning Commission. FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital • •Not applicable Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission and Staff recommend approval of the Strategic Plan for Active Mobility (Phase 1: Bicycle Mobility Plan) without adopting the Matrix of Best Practices at this time. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance with Plan as Exhibit Presentation Ordinance amending MobilityCC, a transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Corpus Christi, by adopting the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) Strategic Plan for Active Mobility, Phase 1: Bicycle Mobility Plan; providing for severance; providing for a repealer clause; and providing for publication. WHEREAS, in 2013 the City adopted MobilityCC that consolidated existing transportation related plans into a single transportation planning framework. MobilityCC serves as the transportation element of the City's Comprehensive Plan and allows a process for design, operation and maintenance of existing and proposed transportation infrastructure; WHEREAS, existing plans that were incorporated and modified by MobilityCC include HikeBikeCC (City's Trails Master Plan for Off -Road Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities) and Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) 2005 Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (City's On -Street Bicycle Facilities Master Plan); WHEREAS, an image of the CCMPO 2005 Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (City's On -Street Bicycle Facilities Master Plan) is embedded in the Urban Transportation Plan map and shall be removed upon adoption of the Strategic Plan for Active Mobility, Phase 1: Bicycle Mobility Plan ("the Plan"); WHEREAS, HikeBikeCC contains prescriptions for trails and/or bikeways that conflict with the bicycle infrastructure types outlined in the Plan; WHEREAS, the City Traffic Engineer recommended approval of the adoption of the Plan to the City Transportation Advisory Commission (CTAC) and at its monthly meeting on February 22, 2016, CTAC recommended approval of the Plan to City Council. The City's Park and Recreation Advisory Committee also passed a resolution of support to adopt the Plan on March 9, 2016; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on Wednesday, March 23, 2016, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard, regarding amending MobilityCC by adopting the Plan. The Planning Commission recommended adoption of the Plan without adopting the Matrix of Best Practices contained within the Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that these amendments would best serve the public health, necessity, and convenience, and the general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens; BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS Ordinance -Bicycle Mobility Plan F Page 1 of 3 SECTION 1. MobilityCC, a transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (the "Comprehensive Plan"), is amended by adopting and incorporating the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) Strategic Plan for Active Mobility, Phase 1: Bicycle Mobility Plan (the "Plan"), without adopting the Matrix of Best Practices contained within the Plan and amending the Urban Transportation Plan Map by deleting the Corpus Christi Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan graphic. The Plan is attached to this ordinance as Exhibit "A" and incorporated into this ordinance by reference as if fully set out in its entirety. SECTION 2. To the extent the amendments made by this ordinance represent a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan and MobilityCC, the Comprehensive Plan and MobilityCC are amended to conform to the amendment made by this ordinance. SECTION 3. The Comprehensive Plan and MobilityCC, as amended from time to time and except as changed by this ordinance, remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. Any ordinance or part of any ordinance in conflict with this ordinance is expressly repealed by this ordinance. SECTION 5. The City Council intends that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance be given full force and effect for its purpose. Therefore, if any section, paragraph, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, that judgment shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance. SECTION 6. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. Ordinance -Bicycle Mobility Plan F Page 2 of 3 The foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre The foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 20 ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor Ordinance -Bicycle Mobility Plan F Page 3 of 3 STRATEGIC PLAN FOR ACTIVE MOBILITY PHASE 1: BICYCLE MOBILITY PLAN Mobility CC EXHIBITA CORPUS CHRISTI BLANK PAGE, INTENDED FOR PRINTING PURPOSES ONLY EXHIBITA TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PLAN INTENT AND OVERVIEW VISION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES ACKNOWLEDGMENTS METHODS. 1 SPECIAL TOPICS NARRATIVE 83 2 Bike Share Programs 84 3 Walking School Buses and Bike Trains 87 4 Local Improvement Districts 87 6 Special Maintenance Agreements 88 7 Cyclovia 88 9 Sate Passage Citation Fee Structure 88 12 Rules and Codes for Safe Cycling 88 13 Bike Safety Classes in Lieu of Fines 90 14-46 Standard Contracting Language tor Construction Zones 90 48 Bicycle Counts 90 50 • Performance Measures 91 51 • APPENDICES 52 • Appendix A: Stakeholder Engagement Database A-1 53 • Appendix B: Steering Committee Invitees A-1 55 • Appendix C: ANSWER IT! Online Survey and Data Summary A-2 59 Appendix D: Presentation Locations A-6 60 62 Appendix E: Community Events Attended A-6 61 Appendix F: Poster and Flyer Locations and Sample A-7 Appendix G: Interview Protocol and List of Interviewees A-8 63 Appendix H: Targeted Vetting of Preliminary Bicycle Mobility Network A-9 Appendix I: Sample Resolution in Support of Implementation of the Bicycle Mobility Plan A-12 A-18 A-9 47 85 Appendix J: Drive Kind Ride Kind Program Guide A-11 Appendix K: Model Bicycle Parking Ordinance Appendix L: Priority Sport Routes tor Road Bikes 76 TABLES AND FIGURES 77 Table 1 - Bicycle Mobility Network Summary 2 77 Table 2 Primary Destinations Used to Identify Hubs of Community Activity 7 78 Table 3 -Supplemental Data Used to Identity Hubs of Community Activity 7 78 Table 4 -Stakeholder Bicycle Route Used to Validate the Bicycle Mobility Network...8 ng Table 5 - Primary Data Collected tor All Bicycle Mobility Network Segments 8 79 Table 6 -Secondary Data Collected for All Bicycle Mobility Network Segments 8 79 Table 7 -Summary of Community Engagement.. 10 80 Table 8 - Supplemental Specialized Treatments 80 Table 9 - Financial Models tor Bike Share Programs 81 Figure 1 - Heat Map of Project Area Depicting Hubs of Community Activity 7 81 Figure 2 - Bicycle Infrastructure Categories as Function of Traffic Volumes and Speeds 9 82 Figure 3 - Preliminary Proposed Bike Share Station Locations 86 Network Development Stakeholder Engagement BICYCLE MOBILITY NETWORK PRESCRIPTION Network Overview Network Details INFRASTRUCTURE ILLUSTRATIONS Bicycle Boulevard Buttered Bike Lane Multi -Use Sidepath, One Side Oft -Road Multi -Use Trail One -Way Cycle Track, Both Sides Specialized Treatment: Highway Bicycle Route Connection Specialized Treatment: Super Sharrow Specialized Treatment: Recapture Parking / Narrow Street Specialized Treatment: Road Diet Specialized Treatment: Bicycle Route Street Crossing MATRIX OF BEST PRACTICES.wiU.N.O.T.Be.AdnAted.At.Ihis.Tims 66 CASE STUDIES 73 Bike Share 74 Accommodating Bikes on Transit 75 Bike Repair Tool Kiosk 76 School District Representation in Transportation Planning Sate Routes to School (SRTS) Bike Friendly Business Accreditation Program Reducing Car Trips To Schools Employer -driven Incentive Programs Sate Routes To Schools Coalition/Task Force79 Neighborhood Fundi Pedestrian Improvements Special Maintenance Agreements Wayfinding/Bicycle Maps Cyclovia Sate Passage Enforcement Bicycle Diversion Program Reduce Oft -street Parking Requirements 82 Bicycle Counts EXHIBITA INTRODUCTION The personal automobile is no longer the ultimate symbol of personal freedom in modern communities. The percentage of vehicles sold nationwide to people under 35—Millennials—has been falling steadily since early in the 21st century, and data suggest that most aging Baby Boomers would prefer to leave suburbia and the two -car garage behind in favor of a more unencumbered existence. These trends are not lost on leaders in the industrial and technical marketplaces, who carefully evaluate the availability of community amenities, such as transit and bicycle networks, before setting up shop in a new location where they hope to attract and retain the best and brightest. Yet planning for and investing in transportation options in Corpus Christi is about much more than retaining our creative class or inspiring Winter Texansto investin permanent roots. Our transportation network is the vascular system of our community, delivering people and goods to destinations and literally shaping our community in the process. The way in which we move around our community is the single biggest determinant of our quality of life. Our transportation choices impact our daily schedules, our free time, our wallets, even our waistlines. When a community transportation system is designed principally around personal automobiles, the streets, neighborhoods, and shopping areas that we build tend to be scaled for cars ratherthan people, and thus, witho ut meaningto, we build communities that make active mobility—walking and bicycling—the more difficult alternatives. Case in pointless than one percent of children aged 7-15 now ride a bicycle to school, a decrease of more than 60% since the 1970s according to the Surface Transportation Policy Project. On the other hand, the experience of communities in the US and beyond shows that strategic investment—the right infrastructure in the right places—in bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure naturally induces development that is denser and more resource efficient (think main streetvs. strip mall), translating into a higher return on infrastructure investments and more tax revenue per unit of developed land. Transportation is the second largest expense for most households, often accounting for 25% of total income in auto -dependent communities according to the U.S. Department of Transportation. Across the nation, obesity rates have doubled in children and quadrupled in adolescents in the past 30 years according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and over 20% of our nation's health care costs are attributable to obesity according to the Campaign to End Obesity. Likewise, mobile sources of air pollutants—cars and trucks—have pushed many communities into non -attainment with federal standards ata significant cost in real dollars and public health. Tools to evaluate the quality of life in our communities, such as the Livability Index produced by the American Association of Retired Professionals (AARP) Public Policy Institute, include a variety of measurable metrics related to housing, neighborhoods, public health, environmental quality, and social equity—all of which are influenced by the community's transportation system. As such, investing in mobility options is one of the most direct ways to enhance quality of life in a community, but such investments must be strategic in orderto yield optimal returns in the form of community benefit. In response to the need for a strategic plan to guide such investments, the Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has undertaken a Strategic Plan for Active Mobility for the urbanized portions of Nueces and San Patricio counties, of which this Bicycle Mobility Plan is Phase I. The MPO receives federal funding to help coordinate and fund transportation projects in the urbanized areas of Nueces and San Patricio counties and has funding dedicated to non -vehicular transportation alternatives. Ultimately, it will be up to the municipalities within the MPO area—Corpus Christi, Portland, and Gregory— and to their partners to construct the infrastructure prescribed in this Bicycle Mobility Plan. Of the hundreds of individuals that our team interviewed or surveyed, the number of respondents—over 70%—who said that they agreed strongly with the vision of a Coastal Bend where walking and biking are integral to the community culture and represent viable, safe mobility and recreation options exceeds the number who said they ride a bike at least once per week by a factor of three! In other words, even non -riders recognize the benefits to our community of infrastructure to support an active lifestyle. Likewise, over70% of respondents also told us that they don't feel safe from vehicles on existing bike facilities. The unmet demand for safe, high quality cycling infrastructure in ourcommunity is clear. EXHIBITA 1 2 PLAN INTENT AND OVERVIEW The M PO's Bicycle Mobility Plan is intended to foster cycling as a meaningful transportation alternative for riders of diverse abilities. This plan was created to alleviate uncertainty about where investments in bicycle infrastructure should be made and how that infrastructure should be designed and maintained. The bicycle mobility network prescribed in this plan was developed with the bike -dependent commuter and casual recreational rider—notthe high-speed sportcyclist—in mind. The planningteam took a blank slate approach to developingthe bicycle mobility network prescribed in this plan, which is designed to enhance access to essential goods and services for all residents of our community. As detailed in the Methods Section (page 6), the team used state-of-the-art mapping software to identify existing and future centers of community activity and to define key connections between them. On average, most individual residences in the urbanized area of Nueces and San Patricio counties are within a two- to five-minute bike ride (on a neighborhood street) from some segment of the new bike mobility network, and the network delivers riders within Y9 mile (about a five-minute walk) of: • 89% (158 of 178) of early education and daycare centers, grade schools (public and private) and higher education campuses • 85%(122 of 143)of parks over two acres in size • 83%(1088 of 1319)oftransit stops and stations • 82%(541 of 657) of low income housing units (Section 8 or Housing TaxCredit properties) • 80%(104 of 130)of groceries, meatand fish markets, bakeries, and cornermarkets • 77%(186 of 242) of pools, senior centers, recreation centers, movie theaters, community pools,fitness centers, museums and hotels On the basis of feedback gathered from the community through interviews, focus groups, and on-line tools, the planning team prioritized a low -stress rider experience and maximal separation between cyclists and cars by using off-road trail segments on stormwater easements wherever possible. Where the bike mobility network corresponds to the street network, the planning team prioritized neighborhood streets with low traffic volumes and speeds. Where the network falls on busier roads, the Plan prescribes alternatives to the standard on -street bike lane, such as separated multi -use sidepath or protected cycle tracks (see Infrastructure Illustrations, page 48) outside of the vehicular travel lanes. The installation of even the most robust, dedicated bicycle infrastructure, which is often separated from the vehicular travel lane to afford the highest level of safety, can represent a meaningful cost savings as compared to maintaining the existing condition of many of our streets. Asphalt pavement designed to support vehicles is much more expensive to build and maintain than hardscape designed only to support bicycles. Where installation of bike infrastructure adjacent to the sidewalk (behind the curb) allows us to eliminate on -street bike lanes and thus narrow roadway width without reducing the number or width of travel lanes the cost of constructing and maintaining the roadway goes down by significantly more than the cost of buildingthe bike infrastructure. In this way, many of the more capital intensive elements of the prescribed bicycle network can be constructed opportunistically over time andwill ultimately help to reduce the overall cost of maintainingour streets. This Bicycle Mobility Plan comprises two major components. Section One, the Network Prescription, details just over 290 miles of network connections: TABLE 1: Bicycle Mobility Network Summary Infrastructure Type Network Miles Percent of Network Low cost/High Impact/Rapid Implementation* *No major capital investment required other than paint and signage Bicycle Boulevard 64 22 Buffered Bike Lane 7 2 Strategic Capital Investments Multi -use Sidepaths 8 3 1 -way Cyde Trades 145 50 Off-road Multi -use Trails (on stormwater and old railroad easements) 66 23 290 Installation of the right infrastructure in the right places is critical to catalyzing the change necessary for walking and biking to become endemic to our community culture, but we also have other means of promotingactive mobilityoptions. Subsequent sections of this plan include: Matrix of Best Practices (page 66), Case Studies (page 73), and Special Topics Narratives (page 83) related to education and encouragement programs, supporting infrastructure, code reform and enforcement, and program evaluation. EXHIBITA VISION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES Vision GOAL • The metropolitan area of the Coastal Bend is a place where walking and biking are integral to the community culture and represent viable, safe • mobility and recreation options for residents and visitors of diverse abilities. Develop a cohesive, strategic network of bicycle facilities that accommodates a diversity of riders 0 GOAL Increase the percentage of trips of all typesthat are made by bicycle • Objectives Objectives Provide bicycle facilities that Provide access for residents are appropriate to street in project area to the bike classification, traffic volume, mobility network within two and desired level of safety miles of their homes and service Increase the proportion of Enhance connectivity transit riders who access between community transit by bike activity centers Increase the proportion of Minimize uncertainty about students arriving to bicycle infrastructure design school by bike and cost by establishing standards (by reference) for the design, construction, and maintenance of bicycle facilities GOAL Promote health and wellness through bicycling Objectives Increase the proportion of community members who indicate that they ride a bicycle at least once per week EXHIBITA GOAL Enhance safety for bicyclists 0 • Objectives Decrease the total number of interactions between bikes and cars Increase fixed/permanent messaging (signage) about safe bicycling within the project area Increase the perception of rider safety among the public 3 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Decision makers in the jurisdictions within the MPO boundary—the cities of Corpus Christi, Portland, and Gregory, Nueces and San Patricio counties, the Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) and the Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District (TxDOT-CRP)—must be commended for their commitment to protecting and enhancing the vibrancy of our region by promoting active mobility options. The highest elected officials and their appointees in each of these jurisdictions, as members of the MPO's Transportation Policy and Technical Advisory Committees, demonstrated great leadership in their resounding support of MPO staff during this planning process. Staff in multiple departments in each municipality followed suit, providing detailed guidance and feedback during the network development and facility selection phases and workingto incorporate the planningteam's recommendations into the design of ongoing roadway projects. The RTA and the City of Corpus Christi deserve special recognition for their financial contributions, which supported specialized consultant teams who provided critical technical assistance to MPO staff. Olivarri and Associates wentto great lengths to engage the full spectrum of stakeholders in the planning process, and HDR Engineering displayed tremendous flexibility in working as a unified team with MPO technical staff to complete the bicycle network development and infrastructure selection portions of this work. The members of the project Steering Committee, each of whom represents an entity that is well positioned to help implement this plan, displayed compelling commitment to this endeavor through their participation in quarterly meetings. This group provided invaluable feedback about the planning process, helping to ensure that the outputs of this work will be put into practice by their respective organizations. These Steering Committee members also served as conduits for information about the bicycle mobility plan to their respective organizations, effectively expanding the web of stakeholders who were invested in this process. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) must be acknowledged for their leadership in investing in transportation alternatives. Continued commitment to active mobility at the federal level is one important part of getting more pedestrian and cycling infrastructure on the ground in our community. Above all else, the planning team wishes to recognize and thank the residents of the Coastal Bend for their clear vision and voice. Individuals from all walks and comers of our community took the time to share their priorities and perspectives, all of which were essential to creating a plan that will help meet the fundamental need in our community for expanded mobility options. EXHIBITA 6 METHODS The bicycle mobility network prescribed in this Plan is intended to foster cycling as a meaningful transportation alternative for riders of diverse abilities and to enhance access to essential goods and services for all residents of our community. Thus, as detailed in this section, the planning team undertook a two-part analysis to identify existing and future centers of community activity and to define key connections between them. Once this network had been defined, the planning team undertook a separate two-part analysis to determine exactly what type of infrastructure should be installed on each segment of the network to uphold the level of safety that the community seeks. EXHIBITA Network Development Community Hotspot Analysis The planning team used Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to map the location of primary destinations—those placesthat shape our daily travel—inthe project area: TABLE 2: Primary Destinations Used to Identify Hubs of Community Activity Primary Destinations Description Schools Early childhood education and daycare centers, elementary/middle/high schools (public and private), higher education campuses Low Income Housing Section 8 or Housing Tax Credit properties Transit Bus stops, Bike Hoardings and Transit stations Food Markets Grocery stores; bakeries; meat, fish, and produce markets; corner store markets Recreation and Tourism Hotels, fitness centers, senior centers, community centers, pools, movie theaters, museums Parks Larger than 2 acres Civic Institutions City Hall, post offices, public libraries, municipal courts, court houses The team also considered other supplemental data about how residents currently move around the community: TABLE 3: Supplemental Data Used to Identify Hubs of Community Activity Supplemental Data Description Travel Demand Model Origin/Destination Data Data (per Census 2010) about where (in terms of census blocks) car trips begin and end in the community Population and Employment Density Relative density of population and employment; areas with higher density of population and employment tend to be more urban and thus more likely to support trips by bicycle Employment to Population Ratio Relative balance of employment opportunities to population density; areas with a ratio closer to 1:1 represent the availability of employment opportunities in close geographic proximity to commensurate population density, thus increasing the likelihood of trips being made by bicyde rather than personal automobile Zero Car Households Location of zero car households (2009-2013 American Community Survey Syr Estimates); zero car households are inherently dependent on other modes of travel, such as cycling, walking and transit Bike to Work Location (residences) of individuals that uses bicyde as means of commuting (2009-2013 American Community Survey 5 -yr Estimates) City of Corpus Christi Destination Nodes Nine Destination Nodes—areas that are pre -disposed for redevelopment as compact, efficient, community centers—were identified in the City's 2011 Integrated Community Sustainability Plan Once the Primary Destinations (Table 2, above) and Supplemental Data (Table 3, above) had been mapped, the planning team created four concentric buffer rings around each destination. The area inside the tightest buffer ring—a 0.25 mile radius around the destination—was weighted most heavily; the area inside each successive 0.25 mile ring was assigned a lesser weighting, where the outer buffer ring (i.e. the area between 0.75 mile and 1 mile around the destination) received the lowestscore. The team then aggregated the scores between overlapping buffer rings to create a heat map (Figure 1) of the community, where the warmest colors represent the highest scores and depict the greatest concentration of primarydestinations. Figure 1: Heat map of the project area, where warm colors depict hubs of community activity as defined by a concentration of key destinations such as schools, food markets, parks, civic institutions, transit stops, low income housing locations, employment centers, and population centers. EXHIBITA METHODS 7 Bicycle Route Selection Once the heat map of community activity centers had been finalized, the planning team examined each of the high scoring (red) areas and assigned individual routing points—points to be connected to create the bike network within each hotspot on the basis of land use, traffic movements, and local knowledge. The team also identified appropriate locations to create routing connections across major arterials and highways and assigned routing points accordingly. The team then used a specialized tool within the GIS platform called Network Analyst to identify connections between the routing points (i.e., to define connections between key locations). To guide this preliminary network development, the team defined parameters that reflected community members' priorities ascaptured through stakeholder engagement activities, including: 1. Off-road trail connections (existing or proposed) were prioritized over routes that followed the street network. Community members indicated that, where possible, they prefer to cycle as far from vehicles as possible. Likewise, there are locations in the project area where off-road trails along stormwater easements or abandoned rail easements afford a much more direct connection between key destinations than existing roadways. 2. Neighborhood streets and minor collectors were prioritized over busier roadways. Community members expressed strong preference for a low stress bike network on streets with low traffic volumes and speeds. What's more, when such streets are designated as Bicycle Boulevards (see Infrastructure Illustrations) the infrastructure (paint and signage) required to keep cyclists safe is much less capital intensive than that required on larger/busier streets. 3. Streets that pass through the orange areas of the heat map (Figure 1, page 7)—i.e. through areas that are on the edge of or adjacent to activity centers—were prioritized over streetsthat run right through the heart of an activity center or through areas with a very low concentration of destinations (cool colors on the heat map). The confluence of traffic and land uses atthe heart of the community hotspots create unsafe conditions for cyclists, so it is safer to route cyclists within a block or two of these destinations and then let them navigate the last block or two (potentially on foot). Once connections between community activity centers had been identified to create a preliminary bicycle mobility network, the planning team reviewed each segment, using data (Table 4) about how folks currently move around our community by bike to validate and refine the preliminary network: 8 METHODS TABLE 4: Stakeholder Bicycle Route Data Used to Validate the Bicycle Mobility Network Data Description Stakeholder Participation Routes As part of the planning process, community members used the MAP IT! application on the project website to record where they ride or would like to ride if conditions improved The planning team encouraged community members to download and use Strava Commuter Routes the smartphone application Strava to track various details of their rides; the team aggregated all Strava data for the project area Sport Routes for Road Bikes As part of a previous project, MPO staff had mapped the top sport routes for road bikes based on input from local cycling clubs' members Bicycle Infrastructure Facility Selection Once the preliminary bicycle mobility network had been thoroughly vetted (see Stakeholder Engagement, page 9) and refi ned accordingly, the planning team identified the type of infrastructure (see Infrastructure Illustrations, page 48) that should be installed on each segment of the network to uphold the level of safety that the community seeks. The team began by compiling primary and secondary data for every segment in the network: TABLE 5: Primary Data Collected for all Bicycle Mobility Network Segments Primary Segment Data Daily traffic volumes for cars and trucks Posted speed TABLE 6: Secondary Data Collected for all Bicycle Mobility Network Segments Secondary Segment Data Right-of-way width Shoulder width and material Number of driveways Number of travel lanes Presence of curb and gutter Presence, type, and relative utilization of on -street parking EXHIBITA On the basis of vehicular traffic volume and speed (Primary Segment Data), the team used a specialized model to assign each segment in the network to one of three bicycle infrastructure categories, wherein the intensity of the infrastructure category is a function of the intensity of the street: Motor Vehicle Speed (MPH) 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 400 600 800 1000 r!r On -Street Bike Lane Mixed Bike and Vehicle Traffic Separated Bike Facility 1200 - Figure 2: Bicycle Infrastructure Categories as a Function of Traffic Volumes and Speeds Source: HDR Engineering Mixed Bike and Vehic e Traffic: On low traffic volume and/or low speed (generally < 25 MPH) streets, bicycles and cars can safely co -mingle. The specific type and combination of lane markings and signage area function of the particular characteristics of the roadway. On -street Bike lane: On streets with moderate traffic speeds and volumes, a dedicated lane is necessary to create a division between motorists and cyclists. Relatively higher traffic speeds and/or volumes within this infrastructure category may necessitate a visual buffer between the bike and vehiculartravel lanes. Separated Bicycle Facility: The busiest class of roadways require a physical separation between motorists and cyclists. Depending on the context, protected bike facilities may take the form of cycle tracks or multi -use sidepaths and may be specified either inside the roadway right-of-way or behind the curb atsidewalk level. Working with the model, the team next used the Secondary Segment Data (Table 6, page 8) to identify specifically which type of infrastructure (see Infrastructure Illustrations, page 48) is appropriate on each segment to uphold the target level of safety and service. Stakeholder Engagement Stakeholder engagement for this bicycle mobility plan began in the spring of 2015 with the formation of a Project Steering Committee comprising delegates from each of the local governmental, agency, and private entities that may ultimately contribute, directly or indirectly, to the implementation of this plan. In addition to numerous vetting meetings about specific portions of the plan with subsets of the Steering Committee over the course of the project, the planning team convened the entire Steering Committee on three occasions to getfeedback on analytical methods and preliminary results. The planning team employed a wide range of strategies to engage community members from the full spectrum of geographic, socioeconomic, demographic, and cultural perspectives. The project Website, www.CoastalBendlnMotion.org, providedthree ways for participants to give input: MAP IT! A Web application that enabled individuals to show the planning team where they ride or would like to ride if conditions improved TRACK IT! A downloadable smartphone application, Strava, allowed users to automatically record speed, distance, and other data every time they took a bike ride. The planning team used these data to prioritize potential routes in the new bike network ANSWER IT! A very short on-line survey captured community members' priorities for cycling related safety and education programs, policies, and supporting facilities The planning team included a consulting team (Olivarri and Associates, O&A) dedicated to direct, in- person engagement to compliment information gathered through the project Web portal. O&A developed a database of potential outreach destinations, community events, key contacts, and community groups to track the public engagement process. The team categorized database entries by geographic location, customer or clientele base, and the type of entity that each locale represented, and this database was updated throughout the project as new events were identified and contacts made. The O&A team captured details about who performed the outreach and whether interviews were conducted orflyers passed, along with notes about the experience. EXHIBITA METHODS 9 Rather than rely on traditional town meeting style events, wherein community members must disrupt their schedule to attend and participate, team members attended community events and regularly scheduled meetings for a diverse range of community groups. The team developed an interview protocol, based on the ANSWER ITI on-line survey described above, for use as a tool when initiating conversations with citizens at events about theirlevel of interest in and priorities for cyclingfacilities and programs. These one-on-one interviews yielded great information about individuals' bicycling habits, sentiments about existing cycling infrastructure, and ideas for improvement. The interviewer included certain demographic questionsto determine the participant's age, gender, studentstatus, and zip code. Safety was the overwhelming theme in these interviews, and most respondents indicated that they do not feel safe riding in the street—even in a conventional (unbuffered) bike lane—because of aggressive drivers. Respondents also frequently cited the accumulation of debris in on -street bike lanes as an issue with current infrastructure. Most participants were supportive of the planning effort and indicated that having a safer, more connected bicycle networkwould be an assetto the city. Those who did not support the idea cited equity, or a lack of faith in equal dispersal of the project's benefits throughout the city, as well as concerns about fundingfor implementation and maintenance. In addition to one-on-one interviews, the team hosted a handful of focus groups with key stakeholder groups as a means of seeking input on the project. The MPO planning team used the information collected through these interviews and focus groups to guide the best practice recommendations that are included in the Matrix of Best Practices section of this plan. The team also passed out flyers and posters at local businesses and organizations in various neighborhoods to promote awareness of the planning process and the opportunities to engage. Likewise, team members attached bicycle packets containing flyers to bicycle racks throughout the city to increase awareness among local cyclists. 10 METHODS TABLE 7: Summary of Community Engagement Engagement Strategy Meetings of full Project Steering Commi[tee3 Number Conducted Additional Details Appendix On-line survey responses collected 220 Appendix B Bike trips logged via Strava smartphone app (May -Oct 2015) 8353 (730 unique riders) — - Bike routes logged via MAP IT! Web app 200 (99 unique users) Presentations given 26 Appendix D Community events attended 15 Appendix E Leaflets and posters distributed 900+ Appendix F One-on-one interviews conducted 50 Appendix 6 Focus groups hosted5 • Industry • Business owners • Roadway design engineers • RTA operators • Corpus Christi Police Dept. Targeted vetting of preliminary network 11 Appendixes EXHIBITA 12 BICYCLE MOBILITY NETWORK PRESCRIPTION On the basis of feedback gathered from the community through interviews, focus groups, and on-line tools, the planning team prioritized a low -stress rider experience and maximal separation between cyclists and cars by using off-road trail segments on stormwater easements wherever possible. Where the bike network corresponds to the street network, the planning team prioritized neighborhood streets with low traffic volumes and speeds. Where the network falls on busier roads, the team identified alternatives to the standard on -street bike lane, such as separated multi -use paths or protected cycle tracks outside of the vehicular travel lanes. On average, most individual residences in the urbanized area of Nueces and San Patricio counties are within a two to five minute bike ride (on a neighborhood street) from some segment of the network, and the network delivers riders within 1/4 mile (about a 5 -minute walk) of: 1 89% (158 of 178) of early education and daycare centers, grade schools (public and private) and higher education campuses 1 85% (122 of 143) of parks over two acres in size 1 83% (1088 of 1319) of transit stops and stations 1 82% (541 of 657) of low income housing units (Section 8 or Housing Tax Credit properties) 1 80% (104 of 130) of groceries, meat and fish markets, bakeries, and corner markets 1 77% (186 of 242) of pools, senior centers, recreation centers, movie theaters, community pools, fitness centers, museums and hotels EXHIBITA KEY MAP BICYCLE MOBILITY NETWORK OVERVIEW On Roadway Network* On Roadway Network* (Proposed) Off -Road Multi -use Trail *On Roadway Network does not necessarily mean in the street; please see detailed network maps and Infrastructure Illustrations, page 48. Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed inTable 8, page 47. 13 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Trade )both sides) Multi -use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed in Table 8, page47. NORTH 14 Abt a' Ave -Dell St Sana Dr O 2 fJh • Llauu Or P OrrilTicd 8.u1 peso Dr L C! Park Iftteces XHIBIT A A2 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multiuse Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Track )both sides) Multiuse Sidepath Ione side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed inTable 8, page 47. NORTH 15 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Trade )both sides) Multi -use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed in Table 8, page47. NORTH 16 EXHIBITA Bl INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1-wCdTrack )bothay sidyes)e Multi -use Sidepath Ione side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments /�. Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed inTable 8, page 47. NORTH 17 C 1 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Trade )both sides) Multi -use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed in Table 8, page47. NORTH 18 C2 B1 Joe Fulton Intl:trade C3 C2 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Track )both sides) Multiuse Sidepath Ione side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed inTable 8, page 47. NORTH 19 C3 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1)bowth sides) -ay Cyde Track Multi -use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail TBD: Corridor study recommended Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed in Table 8, page47. 20 NORTH Jyi •Nhataburger �_ field _ 161 ifH 361 Row -NE II 7-S 1 37-N Corp us Christi °zm B1 C3 D3 XHIBITA S a:fvick Kd Dl INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Track )both sides) Multiuse Sidepath Ione side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed inTable 8, page 47. NORTH 21 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Mu Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1"" 1): 2Z) Track )both Mu Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed in Table 8, page47. NORTH 22 Cl D1 - e i j6 (5, . ', ,,,:.' ,..-,,' ••-.• al, Park 54 C2 .5, Ago. Butt.. St I (-737 SIL 91 soutrwietri Dr 133allEottarcs seethes. Aane' Sr D2 ht r e Sr SAD St Lar f9 95 A4r, SI- C'a 77, Mo ro St 0.; 011yains Park Caftfl ristus Spc,hn 1,, prtal-Memerial 1,403155 - Bert Fad. C C D3 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Track (both sides) Multi -use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail TBD: Corridor study recommended Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed in Table 8, page47. NORTH 23 El INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Trade )both sides) Multi -use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed in Table 8, page47. NORTH 24 D1 oy I8 M LLL E2 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard - Bike Boulevard as Transitional - Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Track (both sides) MuIti-use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail TBD: Corridor study recommended Seatments Mid -block crossing location Sup al Specialized Treatments are list : m Table 8, page47. NORTH 25 Fl INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Trade )both sides) Multi -use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed in Table 8, page47. NORTH 26 F2 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Trads )both sides) Multi -use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail TDD: Corridor study recommended Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed in Table 8, page47. NORTH 27 F3 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Track (both sides) Multi -use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail TBD: Corridor study recommended Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed in Table 8, page47. 28 NORTH G1 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Track )both sides) Multiuse Sidepath Ione side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid-blockcrossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed inTable 8, page 47. NORTH 29 G2 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cycle Track (both sides) Multi -use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed in Table 8, page47. 30 NORTH G3 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde T'd` )both sides) Multi -use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail TDD: Corridor study recommended Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed in Table 8, page47. NORTH 31 G4 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Trade )both sides) Multi -use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail TBD: Corridor study recommended Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed in Table 8, page47. 32 NORTH CR -22 — 22 I cul r CR -20A— - - — 8m —S Staples -SI Hl INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Track )both sides) Multiuse Sidepath Ione side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed inTable 8, page 47. NORTH 33 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Trade (both sides) Multi -use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed in Table 8, page47. NORTH 34 H3 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Molti-use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Track )both sides) Multi -use Sidepath Ione side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed inTable 8, page 47. NORTH 35 H4 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Track )both sides) Multi -use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed in Table 8, page47. 36 NORTH 13 EXHIBITA O O BII Witt Park H3 Rcad b I1 Oso Creek Park Pkwy (p_r2po�ad) 5n INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Track )both sides) Multiuse Sidepath Ione side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location EXHIBITA Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed inTable 8, page 47. NORTH 37 I2 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Track )both sides) Multi -use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed in Table 8, page47. NORTH 38 EXHIBITA I3 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Track )both sides) Multiuse Sidepath Ione side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed inTable 8, page 47. NORTH 39 I4 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Track )both sides) Multi -use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed in Table 8, page47. NORTH 40 I2 EXHIBITA Jl INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Track )both sides) Multiuse Sidepath Ione side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed inTable 8, page 47. NORTH 41 J2 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Track )both sides) Multi -use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed in Table 8, page47. NORTH 42 lie+vksne_d Bay or2 F.jalernest hay 0, Off Road Multi -use Trail ends at Padre Island National Seashore EXHIBITA K1 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath Mne side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Ccles) Track (both sidye Multi-use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed inTable 8, page 47. NORTH 43 K2 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Track )both sides) Multi -use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed in Table 8, page47. NORTH 44 Y Ln: a Or rthwest-BIvtl. - 3m Fier HiIL ( entry _lub _ Multi -use Sidepath (one side) ends at Labonte Park K2 EXHIBITA atZtuaze 11 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cyde Track )both sides) Multi -use Sidepath Ione side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed inTable 8, page 47. NORTH 45 L2 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard Transitional Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Mu Sidepath (one side) as Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment ?atally Cycle Tra ds Multi -use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road Mulli-use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing location Supplemental Specialized Treatments are listed in Table 8, page47. 46 NORTH 4'4 Hart Cemetery re'T Jadoe Eden 4 Ce 23e ..,,,,.. v Fr. rr44,,, ''.i.,, •7 12 Annaville ?, 7 .± ,.,\'' S.,, %,,,, C utp rkit V!, _ ''',, o 11 • • • • ,s‘ ,,ade-Corndo,' 41 .13 fes Costal Bend State Vet erans Cemetery Neto D -Mallard Dr —- `4„„„ (none, 8; r.1 in• wood CMEE0 pprIrCwaiMelaCla I EXHIBIT A Weal Guth Park Curew Err ,...011kins Dr SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIALIZED TREATMENTS* TABLE 8: Supplemental Specialized Treatments Specialized Treatments Street Name From To Transitional Infrastructure Prescription Final Infrastructure Prescription Reduce Lane dvel Lane Width** Up River Rd. Deer Run a trt ance Park trance Buffered Bike Lane N/A Bison Dr. (Prop) 1 -Way Cycle Track, both sides N/A Bloomington St. Archdale Dr. Columbia St. Super Sharrow N. Port Ave. Mesquite St. Broadway St. Bike Boulevard N/A N/A Buford St. 6th St. Shoreline Blvd. 1 -Way Cycle Track, both sides N/A Road Diet Alameda St. Ayers St. Louisiana Ave 1 -Way Cycle Track, both sides N/A Golihar Rd. Staples St. Airline Rd. 1 -Way Cycle Track, both sides N/A 519th St. Morgan Ave. Prescott St. Buffered Bike Lane N/A 5 Gregory St. 4th St. Church St. 1 -Way Cycle Trails, both sides Buffered Bike Lane Spohn Dr. South Saratoga Blvd. Parkway Dr. 1 -Way Cycle Trak both sides Buffered Bike Lane Violet Rd. Starlite Ln. Willowood Ck. Dr. Sidepath, 1 side N/A Violet Rd. Windsor St. Timbergrove Ln. 1 -Way Cycle Track, both sides N/A Akins Dr. Wildcat Dr. 1 -Way Cycle Trak both sides Buffered Bike Lane Loire Blvd. Gingerberry Dr. Recapture Parking, 1 Side Broadway Blvd. Ayers St. Louisiana Ave 1 -Way Cycle Track, both sides N/A Brockhampton St. Staples St. Airline Rd. 1 -Way Cycle Trails, both sides Bike Boulevard Carroll tn. Holly Rd. Brawner Pkwy 1 -Way Cycle Track, both sides N/A Cedar Pass Dr. Tiger Ditch Everhart Rd. 1 -Way Cycle Trails, both sides N/A McArthur St. Horne Rd. Belton St. 1 -Way Cycle Trails, both sides N/A Oso Pkwy Yorktown Blvd. S. Staples St. 1 -Way Cycle Track, both sides N/A Oso Pkwy Bar -Le -Doc Dr. Lens Dr. 1 -Way Cycle Trails, both sides N/A Purdue Rd. Retia Dr. Waldron Rd. 1 -Way Cycle Track, both sides N/A Timbergate Dr. Hunt Dr. 5. Staples St. 1 -Way Cycle Track, both sides N/A Treyway Ln. Holly Rd. Williams Dr. 1 -Way Cycle Track, both sides N/A Trojan Dr. Greenwood Dr. Castenon St. 1 -Way Cycle Track, both sides N/A 1 -Way Cycle Trails, both sides N/A Recapture Parking, Both Sides River Hill Dr. Northwest Blvd. Red River Dr. Buffered Bike Lane N/A Specialized Treatments Reduce Street Width** Street Name Beach Ave. From W. Causeway Blvd. To Timon Blvd. Transitional Infrastructure Prescription 1 -Way Cycle Track, both sides Final Infrastructure Prescription N/A Betty Jean Dr. Williams Dr. Holly Rd. 1 -Way Cycle Track, both sides Buffered Bike Lane Bison Dr. Cimarron Blvd. Bison Dr. (Prop) 1 -Way Cycle Track, both sides N/A Bloomington St. Archdale Dr. Columbia St. 1 -Way Cycle Track, both sides N/A Booty St. Alameda St. Santa Fe St. 1 -Way Cycle Trak both sides N/A Buford St. 6th St. Shoreline Blvd. 1 -Way Cycle Track, both sides N/A Comanche St. 19th St. Artesian St. Sidepath, 1 side N/A Comanche St. Palm Dr. 19th St. 1 -Way Cycle Trak both sides Buffered Bike Lane Daniel Moore Ave. Denver St. Wildcat Dr. 1 -Way Cycle Track, both sides N/A Dry Creek Dr. E. Riverview St. Rapids Dr. Sidepath, 1 side N/A Gingerberry Dr. Loire Blvd. Lipes Blvd. 1 -Way Cycle Trails, both sides N/A Grenoble Dr. Strasbourg Dr. Cimarron Blvd. 1 -Way Cycle Trak both sides N/A Hunt Dr. Long Meadow Dr. Timbergate Dr. 1 -Way Cycle Track, both sides Buffered Bike Lane Lang Rd. Akins Dr. Wildcat Dr. 1 -Way Cycle Trak both sides Buffered Bike Lane Loire Blvd. Gingerberry Dr. Beauvais Dr. 1 -Way Cycle Trak both sides N/A Long Meadow Dr. Saint Andrew's Hunt Dr. 1 -Way Cycle Track, both sides Buffered Bike Lane Midd lecoff Dr. Player St. Long Meadow Dr. 1 -Way Cycle Trak both sides Buffered Bike Lane N. Gregory Rd. Fresnos St. 4th St. 1 -Way Cycle Track, both sides N/A Palm Dr. Lipan St. Comanche St. 1 -Way Cycle Trails, both sides Buffered Bike Lane Robert Dr. Ocean Dr. S. Alameda St. 1 -Way Cycle Trails, both sides N/A Saint Andrew's Dr. Long Meadow Dr. Holly Rd. 1 -Way Cycle Trak both sides Buffered Bike Lane Strasbourg Dr. Loire Blvd. Grenoble Dr. 1 -Way Cycle Trak both sides N/A Tarlton Dr. Cheyenne St. Prescott St. 1 -Way Cycle Trak both sides N/A Teague Ln. Wildcat Dr. Carroll Ln. 1 -Way Cycle Trak both sides N/A Tiger Ln. Kostoryz Rd. Carroll tn. 1 -Way Cycle Trails, both sides Buffered Bike Lane Timbergate Dr. S. Staples St. Master Channel 31 1 -Way Cycle Trails, both sides N/A * See pages 59-65 for illustrations **The prescribed reduction in street width affects only the surplus width on the margins of the curb lanes and does not impact the effective travel lane width. A reduction to 11' travel lane widths allows surplus ROW to be repurposed for bicycle facilities and may have a benefi cia I traffic calming effect but will not impact the efficiency of the street. EXHIBITA 47 48 INFRASTRUCTURE ILLUSTRATIONS Over 70% of survey respondents and interviewees indicated that they don't feel safe from vehicles on existing bike facilities in our community. Thus, where the bike mobility network corresponds to the street network (as opposed to off-road segments on stormwater or railroad easements), the planning team emphasized alternatives to the standard (unbuffered) bike lane that provide more separation between cyclists and vehicles. Each type of bicycle infrastructure that is prescribed in the network is illustrated in this section. Design and maintenance standards are provided by way of reference to external national standards (typically from the National Association of Community Transportation Officials (NACTO) Urban Bikeway Design Guide) that are updated frequently and independently, thus ensuring that the bicycle mobility network in our community will reflect contemporary best practices. EXHIBITA INFRASTRUCTURE ILLUSTRATIONS 1. Bicycle Boulevard 50 2. Buffered Bike Lane 51 3. Multi -Use Sidepath, One Side 52 4. Off -Road Multi -Use Trail 53 5. One -Way Cycle Track, Both Sides 55 6. Specialized Treatment: Highway Bicycle Route Connection 59 7. Specialized Treatment: Super Sharrow 60 8. Specialized Treatment: Recapture Parking / Narrow Street 61 9. Specialized Treatment: Road Diet 62 10. Specialized Treatment: Bicycle Route Street Crossing 63 EXHIBITA 49 BIKE BOULEVARD WITH SHARROW SYMBOL. HOBOKEN, NJ BIKE BOULEVARD WITH DIVERTER. PORTLAND, OR BICYCLE BOULEVARD Description: Bicycle Boulevards are typically local or neighborhood streets that prioritize travel by bicycle. Bicycle Boulevards encourage low motor vehicle speeds, which discourages through traffic, and include safe crossings at busy streets, thus providing a low stress experience for cyclists. Features: • Typical average dailytraffic(ADT) volumes of less than 3,000vehides per day; less than 1,500vehicles per day preferred • Preferred maximum posted speed of 20-25 mph • Wayfinding signs for cyclists and shared lane markings ("sharrows") to let motorists know that cyclists will be present and have priority are the minimum treatments to designate a corridor as a bike boulevard; shared lane markings provide lateral lane positioningguidance to bicyclists, including riding outside the "door zone" of parked cars • Supplemental treatments that should be considered include: • Bicycle friendly traffic calming features to ensure appropriate motor vehicle speeds, such as: traffic circles/mini-roundabouts, vertical deflection (e.g. speed cushions, which can include cutouts thatmatchthe axle width of emergency vehicles) • Priority assignment for through bicycle traffic at two-way stop or at all -way stop controlled intersections; this may necessitate turning the signs to stop traffic on the cross street to the bike boulevard to minimize stops for bicyclists at two-way stops or removingstop signs on two approaches at all -way stops • Trafficdivertersatkeyintersectionsto reduce non-local/through motorvehicle traffic butallowingthrough bicycle traffic • Crossing improvements where the bike boulevard crosses major streets; this may include crosswalk markings, median refuge islands, curb extensions (on streets with on -street parking), rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs), pedestrian hybrid beacons, or traffic signals Benefits: • Allowfor relatively low cost/rapid implementation without right-of-way acquisition or major capital investment • Provide a low stress bicycle experience that accommodates cyclists of nearly all ages and abilities • Provide traffic calming effect and reduce through traffic (particularly when supplemental treatments are implemented), which is of general benefit to neighborhood character and safety • Provide opportunities to integrate water quality and green street infrastructure in conjunction with traffic calming devices (e.g. in planters or traffic circles) Challenges: • Require appropriate crossing treatments at major intersections • Necessitate appropriate wayfinding and safety signage to establish bicycle priority • May impact movement of emergency, transit, and maintenance vehicles if supplemental traffic calming is implemented Design and Maintenance Guidance: • National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO).2014. Urban Bikeway Design Guide, 2nd Edition. • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).2012. Guide forthe Development of Bicycle Facilities, 4th Edition. • Alta Planning Design and !BPI.2009. Fundamentals of Bicycle Boulevard Planning&Design. Relative Cost: • Vary as a function of supplemental traffic calming and intersection crossing treatments implemented • Minimum treatment (only signs and markings):'" $8,500 per mile (assumes 20 pavement markings & 10 signs per mile in each direction) EX I l llBFI ILLUSTRATIONS BUFFERED BIKE LANE Description: Buffered bicycle lanes designate a portion of a roadway for exclusive use by bicycles (byway of striping, signage, and pavement markings) that is separated from the vehicular travel lane or from parked cars by a striped buffer space (typically 2-5 feetin width). Features: • Typical use on streets classified as residential collectors and above • Includes a 2-5 foot wide striped buffer space to separate the designated bicycle lane from the vehicular travel lane or parked cars Benefits: • Allowfor relatively low cost/rapid implementation without right-of-way acquisition or major capital investment • Can replace underutilized travel lanes or parking lanes with simple re -striping • Provide higher level of safety and comfortfor cyclists as compared to standard (unbuffered) bicycle lanes • If used adjacent to on -street parking, provide greater separation between cyclists and parked vehicles, helpingto eliminate"door zone" conflicts and crashes • Buffering helps distinguish the lane as a dedicated space for cyclists, thus reducing the likelihood that it is mistaken for a travel lane or parkinglane • Indicate clearly that bicycles have the right to be on the road and thus helps reduce potential for bicycle/pedestrian conflicts on sidewalks • Encourage more predictable behavior by both motorists and bicyclists • Allow motorists and/orbicydiststo pass other bicyclists with less delay and with fewer passing conflicts • Improve sight distances atdriveways and intersections • Increase the separation between motor vehicles and sidewalks/pedestrians, thereby increasingthe level of comfortfor pedestrians and indirectlyfostering pedestrian activity • May serve to calm traffic by creating the perception of a more distinct lane boundary • Provide additional turning space fortrucks and transit • Provide shoulder space fordisabled vehicles, mail delivery, bus stops, and cars yielding to passing emergencyvehicles Challenges: Require more space than conventional (unbuffered) bicycle lanes • Additional markings and maintenance increase cost relative to conventional (unbuffered) bicycle lanes • Motorists may park illegally in buffered lanes • Often collect debris and broken glass, which may render them (or sections of them) unusable; the buffer between the travel lane and bike lane may reduce the natural "sweeping" effect of passing motor vehicles, potentially requiring more frequent maintenance (street sweeping) • May encourage poor behavior by bicyclists and right turning motorists at intersections and driveways, creating potential conflicts (i.e. "right hooks") • May create confusion among drivers as to whetherthey may cross bufferarea to make turning movements Design and Maintenance Guidance: • National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO).2014. Urban Bikeway Design Guide, 2nd Edition. • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).2012. Guideforthe Developmentof Bicycle Facilities, 4th Edition. Relative Cost: • Striping only: "$40,000 per mile INFRAST RUCTUE LpiirEfFISA MULTI -USE SIDEPATH, ONE SIDE Description: A shared -use sidepath, located on one side of the street (adjacent and parallel to a street), that accommodates two-way non -motorized traffic. Shared use paths are not dedicated bicycle facilities and thus also serve pedestrians, inline skaters, wheelchair users, joggers, and other non -motorized users. Features: • Most commonly used to provide a short connection between two offset intersecting streets or facilities that are part of the regional bicycle network or to provide direct connection to a specific destination, such as a school • Typically used in areas where right-of-way limitations or other physical constraints prevent the installation of bicycle infrastructure on both sidesof the street • Preferred width for a shared -use sidepath accommodating two-way, non -motorized traffic is 12-14 feet; minimum width is l0feet • Width of 8 feet may be acceptable to provide short linkages between other, more robust facilities or where rights-of-way are severely constrained Benefits: • Highly versatile facility • Physical Separation Challenges: • Every street or driveway crossing presents a potential conflict point that merit additional mitigation; extreme care should be taken in the design of sidepaths along streets with many driveways and street crossings (especially high traffic volume locations); conflict mitigation includes strict access management and specific design treatments to improve visibility, reduce speed, and separate movements at conflict points • Presence of users of a wide variety of non -motorized modes and abilities and two-way traffic may reduce predictability operation and increase potential for confl icts, necessitating additional interventions, such as path user speed limits • Provides reduced level of service for cyclists relative to dedicated bicycle facilities Design and Maintenance Guidance: • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).2012. Guide forthe Development of Bicycle Facilities, 4th Edition. • National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO).2014. Urban BikewayDesign Guide, 2nd Edition. Relative Cost: • "' $200,000 - $500,000 per mile, depending on width and material EIXH1'B ALLUSTRATIONS OFF-ROAD MULTI -USE TRAIL Description: A path, typically found along greenways, waterways, active or abandoned railways, and utility easements, within a right-of-way that is independent and physically separated from motor vehicle traffic by an open space or barrier. Multi -use paths are not dedicated bicycle facilities and thus also serve pedestrians, inline skaters, wheelchair users,joggers, and other non -motorized users. Features: • Provides a separated path for non -motorized users alonga linear corridor that is independent of the roadway network • Preferred width fora multi -use path accommodating two-way, non -motorized traffic is 12-14feet; minimum width is l0feet • Width of 8 feet may be acceptable to provide short linkages between other, more robust facilities or where rights-of-way are severely constrained Benefits: • Highly versatile facility • Independence from roadway network creates high quality user experience Challenges: • Intersections oftrailswith roadways presentpotential conflict pointsthat may merit dedicated crossing treatments • Presence of users of a wide variety of non -motorized modes and abilities and two-way traffic may reduce predictability operation and increase potentialforconfl icts, necessitatingadditional interventions, such as path user speed limits • Right-of-way acquisition may be costly and/or complicated • Topography and drainage can greatly impact design, construction, and maintenance • Personal safety measures, such as emergency call boxes and lighting, must be considered due to distance from roadways Design and Maintenance Guidance: • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials(AASHTO).2012. Guide fortheDevelopmentofBicycle Facilities, 4th Edition. Relative Cost: • Typically $400,000 - $600,000 per mile, depending on width and material, not including amenities such as trailheads or supplemental safety measures INFRAST RUCTUE LHiEFFISA .♦ OFF-ROAD MULTI -USE PATH. LITTLE ECON GREEWAY, ORLANDO, FL MIR 15A°TRAIL OFF-ROAD MULTI -USE PATH. MEAD GARDEN TRAIL, ORLANDO, FL CENTRAL PARKWAY CYCLE TRACK. ONE-WAY CYCLE TRACK, BOTH SIDES Description: A one-way cycle track is a bikeway provided on both sides of the street that is physically separated from the vehicular travel lanes that provides exclusive use by bicycles in the direction of motor vehicle travel. Separated bikeways may be placed at either street level, at sidewalk level, or at an intermediate level; the preferred placement in the Corpus Christi metro area is at sidewalk level adjacent to or in close proximityto the sidewalk. Features: • Typically specified on streets with higher traffic speeds and/or volumes • Dedicated bicycle facility separated from motor vehicle traffic by a physical barrier(e.g.the curb) • Differentiated from the sidewalk by way of material choice or surface treatment (e.g. green pigmented concrete) and, where space allows, by a strip (1') of differentiated texture (e.g. pavers or stamped concrete) • Preferred width for one-way cycle track 6feet; minimum width is 5feet • A setback (buffer), preferably grass or otherwise vegetated, of 2 feet (minimum) to 6 feet (preferred) between the back of the curb and the one-way cycle track is preferred to enhance separation between motor vehicles and cyclists and to allow for installation of utility poles,fi re hydrants, mailboxes,transit stops, driveway aprons, trash receptacles, etc. Benefits: • Physical separation from motor vehicle traffic appeals to users of a range of abilities • Where sidewalk level cycle tracks are installed in lieu of on -street bike lanes, cost savings (estimated at$1/2M per mile) may be realized during street reconstruction (with additional savings duringmaintenance) if the curbto curb street width is reduced Challenges: Every street or driveway crossing presents a potential confl ict point that merit additional mitigation; extreme care should be taken in the design of cycle tracks along streets with many driveways and street crossings (especially high traffic volume locations); conflict mitigation includes strict access management and specific design treatments to improve visibility, reduce speed, and separate movements atconfl ict points • Sidewalk level cycle tracks placed atthe back of curb or within a couple feet of the back of curb may necessitate: • Revised driveway design to minimize intrusion into cycle track • Additional consideration of utility poles placement, fire hydrants, traffic signal cabinets, streettrees, trash receptacles, mailboxes, etc. • Design of curb ramps necessitates additional consideration to accommodate both the cycle track and sidewalk, particularly when the cycle track is placed atthe back of curb • National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO).2014. Urban BikewayDesign Guide,2ndEdition. • Caltrans Division of Research, Innovation and System Information (DRISI). 2015. Comprehensive Design Guidance for Cycle Tracks, Prelim inaryInvestigation. • Massachusetts Department of Transportation.2015.5eparatedBike LanePlanningandDesign Guide. • Federal Highway Administration.2015.5eparatedBikeLanePlanningandDesign Guide. • Varies. Typically commensurate with sidewalk construction when constructed at sidewalk grade adjacent to sidewalk INFRAST RUCTUEXrrSA ONE-WAY CYCLE TRACK. MISSOULA, MT XODD FIELD RAI ONE-WAY CYCLE TRACK, BOTH SIDES r 5' (minimum) ADA compliant sidewalk E1' (minimum) buffer between back of sidewalk and ROW limit Unconstrained Condition: Back of Curb to ROW Limit >19' `6' (min.) landscape buffer at back of curb 6' (min.) 1 -way cycle track, differentiated from back of sidewalk and ROW limit 1' (minimum) textured divides between cycle track and sidewalk 56 INFRASTRUCTURE ILLUSTRATIONS EXHIBITA 1 ONE-WAY CYCLE TRACK, BOTH SIDES Partially Constrained Condition: Back of Curb to ROW Limit 13' - 18' r 1' (minimum) buffer between back of sidewalk and ROW limit E 5' (minimum) ADA compliant sidewalk L Concept for Carroll Lane reflects recapture of substantially underutilized parking on one side of the street: 1 Recaptured street width (approx. 7' total) is split evenly between two sides of street: both curbs moved inward by half of width of recaptured parking lane 1 Remaining parking could be alternate sides of the street every 2-4 blocks to create a chicaning and traffic calming effect `2' (min.) landscape buffer at back of curb 5' (min.) 1 -way cycle track, differentiated from sidewalk by color or texture No physical separation (possibly painted stripe) between cycle track and sidewalk EXHIBITA ARR•LL LAN: INFRASTRUCTURE ILLUSTRATIONS 57 ONE-WAY CYCLE TRACK, BOTH SIDES Constrained Condition: Back of Curb to ROW Limit 11' - 12' 1' (minimum) buffer between back of sidewalk and ROW limit 5' (minimum) ADA compliant sidewalk SIC Ze NA DRIV: Cycle track tied to back of curb (no buffer) 5' (min.) 1 -way cycle track, differentiated from sidewalk by color or texture No physical separation (possibly painted stripe) between cycle track and sidewalk 58 INFRASTRUCTURE ILLUSTRATIONS EXHIBITA SPECIALIZED TREATMENT: HIGHWAY BICYCLE ROUTE CONNECTION Application: Sunset Drive Connection to US 181/ Nueces Bay Causeway • Schematic diagram of the bicycle connection between Sunset Drive and the one-way cycle track proposed in each direction on US 181 across the Nueces Bay Causeway • Sunset Drive immediately east of Indian Point Pier Road is currently closed to vehicle traffic (with bollards) and functions as a shared use path • Further east beyond the barricaded section of roadway, Sunset Drive currently provides a bike boulevard connection to the City of Portland • To the west of Indian Point Pier Road, a two-way sidepath should be installed along the US 181 frontage road (which is a two-lane, one-way road) • The sidepath would connect to the one-way cycle track on each side of US 181, passing underneath US 181 and around the north side of the frontage road to reach the southbound direction cycle track • If existing ROW is too constrained to construct the sidepath along the side of the frontage road, the outside travel lane of the frontage road could be converted into the two-way sidepath, which could be separated by a barrierfrom motor vehicle travel Roadway closed to vehicle trate 8 lunndons as aa -street shared use path EXHIBITA INFRASTRUCTURE ILLUSTRATIONS 59 GAINESVILLE, FL SPECIALIZED TREATMENT: SUPER SHARROW Description: Shared Lane Markings (SLMs), or "sharrows," are road markings used to indicate a shared lane environment for bicycles and automobiles, such as a Bicycle Boulevard. "Super Sharrows" (also known as enhanced or priority SLMs) are a variation of the "sharrow" that provides greater emphasis and visibility of the markings. Super sharrows are currently considered an experimental treatment by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Three primary marking schemes have been used for supersharrows. 1. Placing sharrows on a continuous, longitudinal green stripe which is centered within a travel lane. It should be noted that although there are four cities with ongoing, active experiments using this marking scheme (Salt Lake City, UT; Long Beach, CA; Medina, MN; and Oakland, CA), the FHWA has discontinued approval of any further experiments using this specific marking scheme. It is presented here only forcomparative purposes. 2. Placing sharrows overgreen colored pavementbackground(rectangle). 3. Adding supplemental dashed striping on both sides of the sharrow marking. The shared lane marking is not a facility type, it is a pavement marking with a variety of uses to support a complete bikeway network. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (M UTCD) outlines guidance for shared lane markings in section 9C.07. Information on bicycle facilities and the MUTCD, including FHWA requests to experiment, can be found atthis link: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bicycle pedestrian/guidance/mutcd/index.cfm Application: North Port Avenue The only location currently recommended for consideration of super sharrows in the Corpus Christi metro area is North Port Avenue, between Broadway Street and Mesquite Street. This street has the potential to provide an important bicycle corridor, but it is not currently a candidate for changing the four -lane undivided typical section due to its function in accommodatingfreight movements and eventtraffic. Despite high volumes on specialized occasions, North Port Avenue has low overall traffic volumes (less than 6,000 vehicles per day on average); the implementation of super sharrows would encourage bicyclists to use this roadway as a connector to many key destinations and would encourage motorists to completely change lanes to pass bicyclists. If implemented, super sharrow markings on this corridor should be placed in the center of the outsidetravel lanes. Benefits: • Low cost/rapid implementation • Provide lateral lane positioning guidance for bicyclists; markings encourage bicyclists to ride further out into the travel lane in lanes too narrowto share side by side with motor vehicles, which encourages safe passing by motorists • Let motorists knowto expect bicyclists • Indicate clearly that bicycles have the right to be on the road and thus helps reduce potential for bicycle/pedestrian conflicts on sidewalks • Provides awayfinding element along bike route • Discourages wrong -way bicycling Challenges: • Super sharrow marking are considered experimental and require a requestto experiment be submitted to FHWA • Markings must be maintained, although maintenance needs are reduced if markings are placed in the center of travel lanes to avoid vehicle wheel paths • Outreach/communication may be required to educate motorists as to meaning of markings Design and Maintenance Guidance: • National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO). 2014. Urban Bikeway Design Guide, 2nd Edition. EIXHI1B ALLUSTRATIONS SPECIALIZED TREATMENT: RECAPTURE PARKING / NARROW STREET Description: Many two-lane streets in the Corpus Christi metro area that function as collector or residential collector streets are excessively wide due to underutilized on -street parking. Some such streets have designated (striped) parking on each side of the street; some simply have two very wide lanes with no striped parking. Because these streets often provide linkages to streets with higher functional classifications (either arterials or other collectors), they typically have higher traffic volumes compared to most local or neighborhood streets. The unutilized or underutilized parking space gives the perception of a wider travel lane and thus may result in higher traffic speeds, particularly if the street does not have anytraffic calmingdevices, thus creating an intimidating and potentially dangerous environmentfor cyclists. In such cases, recapturing the underutilized parking area on one side of the street by narrowingthe curb to curb width can create space for enhanced pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure while potentially reducingthe cost of roadway reconstruction and maintenance. Application: Brockhampton Street Brockhampton Street between Stonehenge Street and Cimarron Boulevard is a two-lane residential collector street with striped parallel parking on both sides of the street and a 40 -foot curb to curb width. This example retrofit includes thefollowingfeatures: • Highly underutilized parking space is recaptured on one side of the street; an adequate supply of available on -street parking is maintained • Both curbs are moved inward equally, splitting the available additional ROW width gained by recapturingthe parkinglane • A one-way cycle track (5feet wide) is installed on each side of the street immediately adjacentto the sidewalk, ideally set back from the back of curb by at least 2 feet; the cycle track is differentiated from the sidewalk using colored pavement • Parking could potentially be alternated on opposite sides of the street every 2-4 blocks to promote sense of equity in the neighborhood and to create a chicaning and traffic calming effect on the street Benefits and challenges associated with the one-way cycle track are described in the One-way Cycle Track, Both Sides section. The following are additional benefits and challenges associated with the recapturing of parking or street narrowing: Benefits: • May reduce motor vehicle traffic speeds • Provides a safer,lower stress cycling experience Challenges: • Removing travel lanes, even on a lightly traveled corridor, can be contentious and necessitates effective public engagement and communication ADAcomptiant sidewalk EXHIBITA (on -Street parking 2 (min) bu er between back ofcurband cyclenack NORTH INFRASTRUCTURE ILLUSTRATIONS 61 SPECIALIZED TREATMENT: ROAD DIET Description: A "road diet" describes a project to right size a street when it has surplus through lanes given traffic volumes, when can create space for other travel modes or uses. The most common road diet projects involve converting a four -lane undivided roadway to a two-lane roadway (one travel lane in each direction plus a two-way center left turn lane) by removing one travel lane in each direction. A center landscaped median or refuge islands can be used in place of the center two-way left turn lane in locations where driveways are uncommon or absent. Application: Gollihar Road Gollihar Road between Staples Street and Airline Road is a good candidate for a road diet from a four - lane undivided section to a three -lane section, with one travel lane in each direction and center two- way left turn lane. With an average daily traffic volume of lessthan 7,000vehicles per day, this roadway section falls well below the typical maximum volumes for a four -lane to three -lane road diet of 15,000 vehicles per day. The project, as shown, would include the following features: • Raised refuge islands at strategic locations, such as between Sheridan Drive and Mustang Trail, to allow for two-stage pedestrian crossings. The refuge would be supplemented with high visibility ladder style crosswalk markings and rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs). Additionally, the median break at the island would be angled to force pedestrians and bicyclists to look toward the direction of traffictheywere about to cross • The width gained by converting to a three -lane section would be captured by moving the curbs inward an equal amount of each side, translating into savings during roadway reconstruction and maintenance • A one-way cycle track (5 feet wide) would be installed on each side of the street immediately adjacent to the sidewalk, ideally set back from the back of curb by at least 2 feet; the cycle track is differentiated from the sidewalk using colored pavement • On-streetparkingon the south side of the street adjacentto King High School is retained Benefits: • Lower vehicle speed variability (i.e. more consistent traffic flow) due to the diversion (into the center turn lane) ofvehiclesturning left and due to the elimination of aggressive movements between lanes • Improved mobility and access, particularlyfor non -motorized modes: • A three -lane cross section produces fewer conflict points between vehicles and crossing pedestrians • Pedestrians cross one lane of traffic at a time using median refuge islands • Reduced number of collisions and injuries, which generally resultsfrom: • A reduction in speed variability along the corridor • A decrease in the number of confl ict points between vehicles • Improved sight distance for vehicles turning left • Enhanced pedestrian experience and neighborhood character • No right-of-way acquisition is required formost projects • Traffic volumes on streets subjected to road diets typically do not vary from the pre -diet condition, which indicates that function and level of service is not impacted (and may be enhanced) by the road diet 62 INFRASTRUCTURE ILLUSTRATIONS • Elimination of multiple threat pedestrian collisions (when a driver stops in one lane of a multi -lane road to permit a pedestrian to cross, and a vehicle in an adjacent lane strikes the pedestrian who is crossing in frontof the stoppedvehicle) Challenges: • Removing travel lanes, even on a lightly traveled corridor, can be contentious and necessitates effective public engagement and communication 441w fa Nene road diet ADAcompliant sidewalk 2'tmin) bu Ler between back ofcurbandcycletrack EXHIBITA Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) (,pn-Stongreet arki NORTH SPECIALIZED TREATMENT: BICYCLE ROUTE STREET CROSSING Description: Bicycle boulevards and other bike facilities may be required to cross major streets at unsignalized locations. To facilitate safe crossing maneuvers, there are several treatments that may be used including high visibility crosswalk markings, median refuge islands, curb extensions (on streets with on - street parking), rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs), pedestrian hybrid beacons, or traffic signals. Raised Median with Refuge: • Separates conflicts in time and location through use of median islands • Creates a refuge for crossing bicyclists or pedestrians, providing them a safe resting point and opportunity for them to cross the roadway in two stages, which becomes increasingly important with higher traffic volumes and speeds • Crossings may be raised to provide drivers with more visual cues of the crossing location and to help slow traffic or may be fl ush with the roadway using painted islands • Angling the crossing through the median or island forces the bicyclist or pedestrian to face oncoming traffic and make better eye contact with approaching drivers Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons: • Bicyclist or pedestrian activated high intensity flashing beacons mounted beneath standard crossing warning signs that increase awareness of and visibility of non -motorized crossings • Proven treatment in raising the percentage of drivers who yield to bicyclists and pedestrians at mid - block crossings to more than 80%yield ratesat many locations • Preferable to mountsigns on both sides of the street and within the median (if one is present) Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon: • Used to improve crossings for non -motorized users where side street vehicular or non -motorized trafficvolumes do not meetthe minimum warrant thresholds for installation of a traffic signal • Also known as a HAWK (High-intensity Activated crossWalK), the beacon consists of two red lenses overa single yellow lenson the major street and includes pedestrian and/or bicycle indicatorsforthe crossing movement • May result in less delay for motor vehicle traffic compared to a full traffic signal because stopped vehicles are permitted to move if the crossing is clear once the beacon begins to flash red in a wig- wag pattern; this occurs during the normal pedestrian 'flashing don't walk' phase, which immediately followsthe pedestrian 'walk' phase during a double solid red indication for motorists • Have been shown to have similar driver yielding rates as RRFBs and are generally used on higher speed roadways with two or more travel lanes in each direction (Top left) Angled median break forces bicyclist to face the direction of traffic he is about to cross. (Top right) High visibility ladder markings and median island at bicycle boulevard crossing. (Bottom Left) Rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs)at midblock crossing. (Middleright) Signalized crossing for a sidepath connecting two bike boulevard segments. (Bottom right) Pedestrian hybrid beacon with colored pavement bicyclecrossing. EXHIBITA INFRASTRUCTURE ILLUSTRATIONS 63 SPECIALIZED TREATMENT: BICYCLE ROUTE STREET CROSSING Application: Doddridge Street at Fort Worth Street (cros valk, RRF2 or aedeshlarr hybrid beamn • Crossinglocation links bike boulevard segments on FortWorth Street to the north and Reid Drive to the south • On -street parking lane on the south side of Doddridge St. is recaptured between Fort Worth Street and Reid Drive to provide a two-way sidepath between the two streets • A curb extension is constructed in the parkinglane atthe western end of the sidepath • Because there is no space for a median island with the four -lane undivided cross section, a high visibility crosswalk is used in conjunction with additional enhancements (RRFBs or preferably, a pedestrian hybrid beacon) to stop traffic for crossing bicyclists 64 INFRASTRUCTURE ILLUSTRATIONS Application: Columbia Parkway Trail at West Point Road W PWM Rd NORTH dlik • Location provides a two-stage crossing for the Columbia Parkway Trail at West Point Road, and links the trail to the bike boulevard on Yolanda Drive • On -street parking area on the north side of West Point Road is recaptured to create a two-way sidepath between the Columbia Parkway Trail on the east side of the canal andYolanda Drive • The on -street parking area on the south side of West Point Road is recaptured in the immediate vicinity of the Columbia Street/Columbia Parkway intersection, with the eastbound lane shifted to the south to allow the provision of a center median refuge island for the trail crossing • The median island nose is extended to the east of the trail crossing to provide a protected refuge area for crossing bicyclists and other non -motorized users, as well as to control the speed of northbound leftturningvehicles • The trail crossing may be supplemented with RRFBs atthe roadway edges and in the median EXHIBITA SPECIALIZED TREATMENT: BICYCLE ROUTE STREET CROSSING Application: Louisiana Avenue at Ocean Drive rossevalk Existing ignal r Psdeseen `hybrid beaded NORTH • Provides a crossing of Ocean Drive from the proposed trail in Louisiana Parkway to the existingtrail along the east side of Ocean Drive • Louisiana Parkway Trail would connect to the existing signalized intersection for southbound Ocean Drive where bicyclists and pedestrians would cross the west leg of Louisiana Avenue and the south leg of southbound Ocean Drive • A pedestrian hybrid beacon would be required to stop traffic for non -motorized users wishing to cross the northbound lanes of Ocean Drive • Motorist delay would be minimal due to non -motorized crossings, as the southbound traffic signal and northbound pedestrian hybrid beacon would operate independently with short clearance intervals due to the relatively short distance required to cross each direction in isolation Application: Staples Street at McClendon Street Pedestrian 3 hybrid beacon (Frcrtage connectlond)—" • t* TitP New crosswalkost median refuge NORTH • Crossing location links bike boulevard segments on Blevins Street to the west and McClendon Streetto the east • Although Blevins Street and McClendon Street do not align, no sidepath is necessary along Staples Street due to the presence of the frontage road on the west side of Staples Street, which is also used as a short bicycle boulevard • A median island with refuge provides a two-stage crossing not only for bicyclists, but also transit users as there are bus stops on each side of Staples Streetthat are in very close proximity to the marked crosswalk • The median island is placed to avoid blocking vehicular leftturn movements atthe cross streets • The crossing should be supplementedwith RRFBs or, preferably, a pedestrian hybrid beacon EXHIBITA INFRASTRUCTURE ILLUSTRATIONS 65 66 MATRIX OF BEST PRACTICES: Will NOT be Adopted at This Time .11 Topics 'arra iveor ppen•ix seesu•sequen sec ions o ur ercari iy erecommen•a EXHIBITA on M EXHIBITA gets MATRIX OF BEST PRACTICES 67 M A 71-11 r nr C'T rl I-1 A 1".711".1— **Cost of Implementation: gets UM UM to schools _ ISDs (Public& Private) UM UM 68 MATRIX OF BEST PRACTICES EXHIBITA **Cost of Implementation: Low - Potentially accomplished through process modification within limits of existing budgets and/or take on responsibilityfor landscaping and maintenance EXHIBITA Services Depts. gh lium lium lium num i in gh gh MATRIX OF BEST PRACTICES 69 MA Tr 1\/ n r[`T inn A P TI r ets 70 MATRIX OF BEST PRACTICES EXHIBITA **Cost of Implementation: gets evaluates roadway capital projects on the basis of 6 complete street criteria EXHIBITA MATRIX OF BEST PRACTICES 71 72 MATRIX OF BEST PRACTICES EXHIBITA CASE STUDIES 1. Bikeshare 74 2. Accommodating Bikes on Transit 75 3. Bike Repair Tool Kiosk 76 4. School District Representation in Transportation Planning 76 5. Safe Routes to School (SRTS) 77 6. Bike Friendly Business Accreditation Program 77 7. Reducing Car Trips To School 78 8. Employer -driven Incentive Programs 78 9. Safe Routes To School Coalition/Task Force 79 10. Neighborhoods Funding Pedestrian Improvements 79 11. Special Maintenance Agreements 79 12. Wayfinding/Bicycle Maps 80 13. Cyclovia 80 14. Safe Passage Enforcement 81 15. Bicycle Diversion Program 81 16. Reduce Off-street Parking Requirements 82 17. Bicycle Counts 82 EXHIBITA 73 CASE STUDIES A. Bikeshare -Jurisdiction Owned and Operated In August 2008, the District of Columbia became the first jurisdiction in North America to launch a bikesharing system. SmartBike D.C. offered 120 bikes at 10 stations in downtown D.C. and the Center City. Approximately 1,600 people joined SmartBike D.C. during its 2 years of operation. Meanwhile, Arlington County, VA was working on its own plans for a bikesharing system. Together, Arlington and the District reviewed proposals and selected an operator for a new bikesharing system in May2010. In August 2012, Alexandria, VA launched eight stations, becoming the newest member of the Capital Bikeshare community. In May 2013, Montgomery County became the latest DC -area jurisdiction to join the Capital Bikeshare program. Working together,the District of Columbia, Arlington County, Alexandria and Montgomery County are proud to bring an expansive, multijurisdictional transportation system to the region. The Capital Bikeshare system is owned by the participating jurisdictions and is operated by Motivate, a Brooklyn, NY -based company that operates several other bikesharing systems including Citibike in New York City, Hubway in Boston and Divvy Bikes in Chicago. Capital Bikeshare ads describe the scope for the program: Capital Bikeshare puts over 3000 bicycles at your fingertips. You can choose any of the over 350 stations across Washington, D.C., Arlington and Alexandria, VA and Montgomery County, MD and return itto any station near your destination. Check out a bike for your trip to work, Metro, run errands, go shopping, or visit friends and family. Join Capital Bikeshare fora day, 3 days, a month, a year or try our new Day Key option, and have access to our fleet of bikes 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. The first 30 minutes of each trip are free. Each additional 30 minutes incurs an additional fee. Entity:Capital Bikeshare Location: Washington, D.C. Website: www.capitalbikeshare.com B. Nonprofit In 2011, Boulder B -cycle launched a nonprofit program that allowed easy, low -impact transit for seasoned bikers, commuters, and visitors alike. In contrast to a standard bike rental, bike sharing allowed a community to share a fixed number of bikes through short station -to -station bike trips and provided an all around shakeup of traditional commute options. Once a rider purchases an entry pass, they can take as many 30 minute trips as they want for the duration of that pass at no additional cost. Additional fees apply to all trips over 30 minutes, encouraging riders to check bikes that aren't actively being used back into stations. The mobile app's interactive, real-time map shows riders what stations might be close or most convenient plus updates riders on bike availability. 74 CASE STUIDES "Boulder B -cycle is part of the Boulder landscape and the Boulder experience" said James Waddell, Boulder B -cycle Executive Director. "When you think of Boulder you think of the scenery, bikes and of healthy, environmentally conscious people. Every time someone rides one of our bikes, that's gasoline saved, carbon emissions spared and calories burned." In addition to offering seamless transit, Boulder B -cycle has crafted a handful of city -specific "tours"that give riders another way to experience Boulder culture. The brewery tour, for example, provides a map with best routes and nearby station details for eight local breweries. B -cycle, LLC. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Trek bikes based out of Waterloo, Wisconsin, where they design and manufacture the bikes and stations found in all B -cycle cities. On the software end, Trek designs the front end software with which users interact, the back end database that all B -cycle systems use, the B -cycle website platform, and the official B -cycle mobile app. Entity: Boulder B -cycle Location: Boulder, CO Website: www.boulder.bcycle.com C. Private for Profit Deco Bike launched a 650 bicycle, 72 station system in March 2011 in Miami Beach, Florida and reached 180,000 rides by July 2011. Operations are active 24 hours per day, seven days per week. Their fee structure offers two monthly plans and several hourly block plans, but no annual fee. Revenue comes from advertising on the kiosks and membership fees only. DecoBike is unique in the US, havingfunded the $4 million program entirely without public funding as a concessionaire for the City of Miami Beach. In order to use Miami Beach's public spaces for their kiosks, DecoBike pays the city 12% of membership fees and 25% of advertising revenue estimated to be worth $13 million to Miami Beach over the 6 year contract. Operating expenses are projected to be $1.8 million annually, with 1/3 covered by advertising revenue, and the remainder, and any profit, coming from user fees Due to their agreement with Miami Beach, DecoBike is not allowed to advertise on the kiosks themselves. While allowing such ad placement would improve both DecoBike and Miami Beach's revenue take in the venture, public sentiment is that they would detract from the aesthetics of the neighborhood. Entity: Deco Bike LLC Location: Miami Beach, FL Website: www.cgibikemiami.com EXHIBITA 2 Accommodating Bikes on Transit Houston, Texas, is home to one of the most successful light rail lines ever built in the U.S. in terms of ridership per track mile, boasting an average daily ridership of about 37,000 in September 2013. METRORaiI's Red Line consists of 18 cars that operate along a 7.5 -mile route, beginning at the downtown campusof the University of Houston and ending nearthe Texas Medical Center. In 2007, BikeHouston, a local bicycle advocacy organization, and the Citizen's Transportation Coalition joined forces to advocate for the implementation of bike racks on METRO buses. Houston METRO began accommodating bicyclists on buses by equipping the buses with the highly successful front- loading bike racks. However, forthe light rail line, access for bicycles was severely limited, as bikes were only allowed between 9:OOa.m and 3:00 p.m, there were no bike racks available on the n a r r o w - aisled cars, and METRO officials had previously contended that the introduction of safety racks would pose problemsforsafety and congestion. As part of the long-term planning process, METRO began considering the details of light rail service expansion. During discussions of the expansion, METRO officials sought the input of BikeHouston representatives about their views of light rail service and possible impacts on the cycling community. The communication was also intended to inform bicycling stakeholders about construction activities that would be occurring around rail expansion in hopesthat these issues could be communicated to the wider bicycling community through the BikeHouston network. Through these conversations, members of BikeHouston called attention to the limited accessibility issues and METRO listened to the concerns in an effort to better plan forfuture lightrail service. As the conversation progressed, the working group expanded to include the Rail Operations Center and Service Delivery staff, Safety and Security, Communications and Marketing, and Planning staff. The inclusion of representatives from these departments allowed METRO to better gauge the considerations of rider density during peak hours, configuration and safety of various bicycle storage alternatives, and current operating conditions. Later, METRO established additional dialogue with the communities where future rail will be installed and increased the bike working group to include the City of Houston's Bikeways, Parks, and Sustainability departments. During the bike working group's study of ridership patterns, METRO planners saw an opportunity to change the hours that bicycles are permitted on board. To better accommodate cyclists, METRO expanded the bike -friendly hours on light rail to include all but peak -hour travel, defined as weekdays from 6:30 to 9:00 a.m. and 3:OOto 6:00 p.m. During weekends, bikes are now permitted at any hour. In addition to the expanded hours, METRO and BikeHouston also worked to consider a number of bicycle - storage alternatives, finally deciding on removing fixed seats from cars to provide space for bikes. Reviewing a variety of configurations on the Siemens cars, BikeHouston members and METRO officials gathered to test them, eventually deciding on a format that would remove two benches (four seats) from each end of the car. In July 2010, Houston METRO began implementing the changes in the form of a 30day trial period on 11 of the 18 Red Line cars. The program was initially "soft -launched," since there was uncertainty as to the public reaction and impacts on ridership. Eighttotal seats from each car were removed and replaced with standing space and overhead straps. By September 21, METRO judged the program a success and implemented the changes on all 18 cars, adding signage informing riders of the appropriate bike entry doors and storage areas. Furthermore, the incorporation of the Bikeways, Parks, and Sustainability departments to the working group has allowed METRO to begin planning better for bicyclists as it introduces light rail to new communities. Discussions thus far have included new mapping, wayfinding signage, and bike racks. Spurred by media coverage, Houston METRO conducted informal surveys during the testing period using Twitter, Facebook, and other social media. Polling was done electronically and in-person, with overwhelmingly positive results. The public relations survey conducted resulted in greater than 95 percent positive feedback. In fact, not only did riders react positively to the expanded access for bicyclists, but the changes benefited multiple types of users, including passengers with disabilities, parents with children, and those riders prefen-ingto stand. In October 2013, there were 22,230 total monthly bike boardings on METRO vehicles (including buses and light rail cars). That figure is a 10 percent increase over the previous month and a 44 percent increase overthe total from October2012. Rider feedback indicated that the seat removal and hours changes were beneficial to riders beyond the bicycling community. The Siemens rail cars have narrow aisles, which made navigating the cars difficult for riders with physical challenges and to those pushing strollers. With the removal of seats, many passengers have noted the improved navigability and improved options for securing wheelchairs, strollers, and bikes. Most importantly, though, this initiative signalsthat Houston METRO is planning for and promoting bicycling as part of a larger transportation network. According to METRO's associate vice president, Andrew Skabowski, "Its METRO being more mobile, if we can. The biking community is saying, 'Hey, we're not just for recreation anymore; we bike to work.' That's important to that community, and we're thereto assist and get people to work." With the March 2013 expansion of Houston's bike share program, B -Cycle, METRO is working on a report that includes recommendations forimprovingthe transit -bike connection for bike share users. The change was financially beneficial to Houston METRO. While the initial cost of the configuration change was a total of $7,791.12, with labor accounting for $3,150 and materials for the remaining $4,281.12, METRO also experienced a one-time savings of $8,640 by returning the removed seats to the stock of spares. Further, METRO also saves $3,960 annually for the decreased maintenance needs on the 18 cars. Entity: HoustonMETRO Location: Houston,TX Website: www.ridemetro.org EXHIBITA CASE STUIDES 75 3 Bike Repair Tool Kiosk A-1 Builders in Bellingham has been a bicycle -friendly company for years. A decade ago, to mark the company's 50th anniversary, A-1 built a large covered space for bicycle parking at the downtown Community Food Co-op store. Now, for its 60th anniversary, A-1 has built a covered community kiosk with a public bicycle repair station by the sidewalk outside its offices at 3310 Northwest Ave. Rick Dubrow, company president and an avid biker, said Bellingham and other communities would benefit from more bike -repair stations. "Our hope is thatthis is the firstof many," he said. At first, the folks at A-1 were thinking about installing just a kiosk for community notices. Then, last September, Patrick Martin, a production manager at A-1, took his daughter to Evergreen State College in Olympia and saw a sturdy bicycle pump and repair station installed outdoors by some dormitories. He thought back to the idea of a kiosk, and realized a pump and repair station could fit inside. "I thought we should put the two together," said Martin, who did much of the design work for the station. A 12 -by -12 -foot concrete slab forms the base that is decorated with old bicycle parts—gears, tire rims, lengths of bicycle chain—embedded in the concrete. The side walls of the kiosk have plastic -covered maps showing local bicycle routes, trails, parks, and Whatcom Transportation Authority bus routes. There's also a bulletin board for community notices. On the outside back wall of the kiosk hangs covered shelves for a small community lending library, where people can drop off and borrow books. Inside the kiosk, bolted to the slab, is a vertical metal stand that holds a bicycle while it's repaired,tuned up or given air. Basic bicycle -repair tools hang from the stand, secured by long cables to prevent theft A sticker on the stand has a QR code, so bikers with smartphones can scan the code to reach a website with short how-to videos about basic bicycle repairs. Bolted next to the stand is a sturdy, hand -powered bicycle pump. Nearby on a shelf are two bicycle repair how-to books, also secured to preventtheft A motion detector turns on several lights when people enter the kiosk at night, for nighttime repairs and for public safety. The installation cost about $16,000, much of which was covered by donations of money, materials and labor, Dubrow said. Entity: A-1 Builders Location: Bellingham, WA Website: www.albuilders.ws/ 76 CASE STUIDES 4 School District Representation in Transportation Planning The Phoenix School Safety Program was developed by a task force created following a collision involving a young student who ran into a busy street against a traffic signal. The task force included a local parent and individuals from the local police, transportation, highway safety, and law departments, as well as representatives from local schools. The task force recommendations yielded eleven major changes. The solution was a combination of education, enforcement, and facilities improvement. Education measures included a new School Crossing Guard training video, which was produced in English and Spanish to be used in all subsequent training programs. A new training handbook (English and Spanish version) was developed and distributed, in addition to a "Safest Route to School" walking plan to encourage parents and students to safely walk to school. In addition, a School Safety Summit broughttogether the state's school and traffic officia Is to work togetherto implement the recommendations. For enforcement measures, a school crossing safety audit was developed to help identify those areas of a school most in need of improvement. Phoenix also equipped schools with radar -controlled cameras mounted to vans to enforce the speed limit during school start and dismissal times. Other improvements included the installation of "SCHOOL" pavement stencils on roads approaching the school area, fluorescent yellow -green school warning signs, safety vests for guards, staggered crosswalks, and two trial active speed monitorsthat flash when a driver's speed exceeds the speed limit during school operating hours. An experimental in -pavement flashing crosswalk was installed at a local high school. Once activated by a pushbutton, the device issues verbal warnings to pedestrians that cars may not stop. Additionally, school staff developed a set of guidelines for drop-off and pick-up times to reduce congestion and spillover onto the street in front. Funding of $500,000 per year was provided by the City of Phoenix. The program resulted in the most significant advance in safety at Arizona schools since the inception of the 15 mph school zone in 1950. The program reached 400 schools statewide, 6,872 speed citations were given, 11 Safest Route to School walking plans were completed, and 173 crossing safety audits were conducted. Entity: Cityof Phoenix Location: Phoen ix, AZ Website: www.phoenix.gov/streetssite/Pages/School-Safety.aspx EXHIBITA 5 Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Rosa Guerrero Elementary is a Title 1 neighborhood school, and 75% of the 850 students live within walking distance, or 2 miles, of the school. Sidewalks are present in the neighborhood around the school, and approximately 30 percent of the students have permission from their parents to walk to school. One of the biggest barriers for students walking to Guerrero Elementary is the traffic at a busy intersection. According to Carol Camp, former Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program Coordinator for Texas Department of Transportation, the City of EI Paso was awarded $10,000 in SRTS funds to develop a SRTS Plan and Program for Rosa Guerrero Elementary in 2007. The City selected a consultant and paid a service fee of $8,000 to assist in the development of Rosa Guerrero Elementary School's SRTS Plan. The remaining $2,000 was used to support PTA volunteers in developing an education and encouragement program forstudents, teachers and parentsto promote the SRTS Program atthe school. SRTS coordinators increased school and community support and gained volunteers by offering education and training by the El Paso Police Department. The school also held two raffles, and offered other incentives to rewardvolunteers fortheir hardwork. The school added traffic enforcement signage that identified "Drop Off Zone,""Pick Up Zone," and "Students Crossing, Please Slow Down" as well as safety school stop signs for crossing guards, which made drivers aware of students and parentswalking to school. Raising driver awareness led community members to feel safer walking to school. The school provided incentives for parents and students who participated in the program. For example, each time a student walked to school, he or she received SRTS pencils and stickers. Teachers tracked students' progress by logging data into pamphlets purchased with federal funding. Students were rewarded with SRTS water bottles. Participating parents were given water bottles and SRTS walking logbooks to track their progress. All participating students were entered in a drawing for a bicycle that was held atthe conclusion of the SRTS program. Entity:TnDOT -PlanningSection Location: El Paso, TX Website: www.saferoutesinfo.org/program-tools/find-state-contacts/texas 6 Bike Friendly Business Accreditation Program In Los Angeles, 50% of trips are under 3 miles—a 10-15 minute trip for the casual rider. The Bicycle Friendly Business (BFB) Program is a citywide opt -in program that encourages businesses to embrace bicycle friendly practices in order to attract more local trips bywalkingand bicycling. According to Mayor Eric Garcetti, "The Bicycle Friendly Business Program represents one of the many tools in our Great Streets toolbox. As we remake our streets to better serve our neighborhoods, the Bicycle Friendly Business Program will make it easier for Angelenos to choose to travel and shop by bike. We look forward to see ingyou on the street!" Councilmember Mike Bonin, who Chairs the City Council's Transportation Committee, recognizes that people on bikes also tend to know their neighborhood better, which builds community and makes neighborhoods safer: "Our neighborhoods are stronger when people can live, work and shop at local businesses without needing their cars, and the Bicycle Friendly Business Program will help put neighborhoods first in Los Angeles. I'm excited to see the Bicycle Friendly Business Program expand throughout Los Angeles and I think the expansion of this program is a great sign that LADOT is heading in the right direction and making alternative transportation a priority." The citywide program gives businesses the opportunity to be recognized for making accommodations for staff and patrons who cycle by adhering to a variety of bicycle friendly practices. The program also provides bicyclists with a directory of local participating businesses that specifies the bicycle friendly amenities offered. The BFB program provides data resources to illustrate how bike friendly business practicestranslate into enhanced profitability. Entity: City of LosAngeles- DOT Location: LosAngeles, CA Website: www.ladot.lacity.org/index.htm EXHIBITA CASE STUIDES 77 7 Reducing Car Trips to School Morton Way Public School in Brampton, Ontario, Canada has 877 early education and elementary students (Junior Kindergarten through Grade 5). During the past four years, Morton Way has sustained a successful walk -to -school program, wherein between 83 and 92 % of students walk or bike to school on specific days. Approximately 50 students travel to school -by -school bus because of distance. Despite the success of the program, the Morton Way Community still felt there were too many students arriving by personal automobile, so they implemented a "25 Cars or Less" campaign. A "thermometer" display alerts drivers how many vehicles dropped off students the day before, and the daily school announcements update the students of progress. There are also signs displayed around the school promotingthe "25 Cars or Less" campaign. Entity:Morton WayPublic School Location: Brampton, ON (Canada) Website: www.schools.peelschools.org/1510/Pages/defaultaspx 78 CASE STUIDES 8 Employer -driven Incentive Programs St. Lukes Hospital - Boise, ID: At St. Luke's Hospital in Boise, personnel who ride 60% of their workdays between May and September earn a $40 gift certificate to a local bike shop. The campus also boasts showers and bike racks. Scott Dohmen, the hospital's employee alternative transportation coordinator, says that the hospital has a commitment to providing incentives to those who ride to work 'To promote alternative transportation, get the cars off the road and getpeople in shape." Clif Bar – Emoryville, CA: Clif Bar, which employs more than 300 employees at its Emeryville, CA headquarters, takes bike -to -work incentives to a whole new level. The company's Sustainability Benefits Program includes an incentive of up to $500 to buy or repair a commuter bike. Employees who walk, bike, carpool or take public transportation to work can also earn points for each trip — redeemable for rewards like cash, massages and Clif gear. New Belgium Brewing– Fort Collins, CO: Cars are a rare sight at New Belgium Brewing s flagship brewery in Fort Collins. After a year on the job, each New Belgium employee receives a free limited release Fat Tire Cruiser bike, in honor of the company's best-selling Fat Tire Amber Ale. Employees can also borrow a cruiser from a fleetof shared bikes for local errandsand lunch breaks. Honest Tea – Bethesda, MD: Organic beverage maker Honest Tea gives its employees who either bike or walk to work $27.50 extra in their paychecks monthly. In addition, in the summer of 2007, the company bought each of its then 52 employees Jamis bikes. The company's president and 'TeaEO' Seth Goldman bikes about a mile to work every day, so he understands the perils of the bicycle commuter. When the company moved into its current office building in 2007, Goldman insisted on having showers installed in the bathrooms. Patagonia (multiple locations): Patagonia's Drive -Less program provides a monetary incentive for employees to bike, walk, carpool or take public transit to work. It pays all U.S. and Canadian employees $2 per trip, up to two trips per day. Each employee can earn up to $500 (pre-tax) per year. In the firstyear of the program, more than 900 employees participated. As a collective result, in that firstyear Patagonia employees drove 690,000 fewer miles, cut CO2 emissions by 500,000 pounds and saved 25,700 gallons of fuel. Jamba Juice – Emeryville, CA: Jamba Juice offers a set of bright orange loaner bikes for employees to use for errands and lunch breaks, as well as plenty of space for bike commuters to park their own rides. The company has also developed an extensive wellness program that includes health insurance premium discounts in exchange for completing challenges, such as participating in Bike to Work Day, attending a bicycle repair class, or going on a practice ride. Jamba Juice has become known in the area for its bike - friendly ways and was identified as one of the most bike -friendly businesses of the year by local advocacy group Bike East Bay. EXHIBITA 9 Safe Routes To School Coalition/Task Force 1 1 Many Denver schools struggle with traffic congestion and environmental pollution, and, like many communities, an increasing number of children engage in less daily physical activity than is recommended by healthcare professionals, contributing to Denver's growing childhood obesity epidemic. Denver's Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program use a variety of strategies to facilitate safe walking and biking to school. Additionally, successful SRTS programs involve the whole community: parents, children, schools, the city, residents, neighborhoods, non-profit organizations and public health agencies. SRTS programming utilizes a Coalition made up of partners from Denver Environmental Health, Denver Public Schools, Denver Public Health, Denver Public Works, Bicycle Colorado, BikeDenver, Safe Routes to Schools National Partnership, WalkDenver, Livewell Colorado and others. Together, this Coalition is actively working to develop systematic programming so that all Denver communities can achieve state and regional Safe Routes to Schools goals. Entity: City of Denver - Department of Environmental Health Location: Denver, CO Website: www.denvergov.org Neighborhoods Funding Pedestrian Improvements 1 0 The Ida Culver House in the Greenwood neighborhood of Seattle has 600—foot section of walkway along First Avenue NW that was designed and constructed in 1993-94. It is used by the residents of the Ida Culver House and was the only section of the block without an asphalt walkway or concrete sidewalk. The residents were awarded a Small and Simple Matching Fund projects grant by Department of Neighborhoods (DON) to fund the project. Key factors used to evaluate the walkway were parking, drainage, and ease of construction. Elimination of parking can make a walkway less desirable to residents. Closing open ditches to accommodate a walkway is expensive. Slopes that would require stabilization make construction difficult and more expensive. None of these factors was an issue atthis site. The walkway was estimated to cost $12,000 ($20 per linear foot fora five—foot wide walkway). DON provided $5,000 and Ida Culver House $7,000. When the project was completed under budget, the remaining $2,000 was returned to the residents. The walkway provides pedestrians with a firm, stable walking surface that separates them from carstraveling along the adjacentroadway. Budget DON Small and Simple Projects Fund Ida Culver House Total $7,000 $5000 $12,000 Entity: City of Seattle- Department of Neighborhoods Location:Seattle, WA Website: www.seattle.gov/neighborhoods/ Special Maintenance Agreements Overthe years, the Seattle Engineering Department (SED) had received a number of requests for traffic control at a particular neighborhood intersection. Investigation revealed high speeds, (85% of the traffic was going 31 mph or faster), high volumes (1,215 cars per day), and high accident rates (five accidents in the lastthree years). Although the community had requested traffic control for each of the four previous years, the intersection did not compete successfully for a traffic circle until 1995". Additional complications included special design because of difficult intersection geometry. As with all traffic circles funded by SED, the Engineering Department and community volunteers landscape the circle in the springfollowing construction and a communityvolunteermaintains the traffic circle. Budget SED Neighborhood Traffic Control Program $6,500 Total $6,500 SED's Neighborhood Traffic Control Program receives funds to build seven to fifteen traffic circles a year. With over 600 annual requests for traffic circles, priority is given to those intersections with high accidents, speeds, and volumes. If an intersection does not compete well for SED funding, communities are encouraged to apply to the Departmentof Neighborhoodsfor Matching Funds. Entity: City of Seattle- Public Utilities Location: Seattle, WA Website:www.seattle.gov/util/ EXHIBITA CASE STUIDES 79 Wayfinding/Bicycle Maps 1 2 1 3 Oakland residents lacked a comprehensive guide to walking and biking in their city, making it difficult to know the availability and quality of walking and bicycle routes. A generous grant from the State of California Office of Traffic Safety mandated an education project targeting the general population of pedestrians. The Oakland Pedestrian Safety Project used the grant to create a map that highlights walkways, bikeways, landmarks, civic destinations such as schools and libraries, neighborhood names, historic networks of paths, major transit routes, and street grades. The back of the map features bike and pedestrian safety tips, a primer on pedestrian design improvements, recommended walks, and walkingtour information. The 18,000 maps printed were distributed to neighborhoods and community organizations, bookstores, bike shops, schools, and recreation centers. The map was a collaboration between the Oakland Heritage Alliance and local volunteers, who all helped survey existing pathways and staircases. City archivists aided in the effort byfinding the names of most of Oakland's old neighborhoods. An experienced designer and publisher was contracted to produce the map. Funded by the State of California Office of Traffic Safety, total costs carne to $48,000 including staff time, street grade surveys, map design, and map printing. The project took 6 months from conceptto printing. Walk Oakland! has generated excitement and positive feedback from neighborhood groups and school kids. Itis expected that the map will serve as a starting point for further projects to encourage both walking and better pedestrian -friendly design. Demand has been high, and it is expected that another printingwill be necessary in the nearfuture. Entity: Rufus Guides Location:Oakland, CA Website: www.rufusguides.com/oakland.html 80 CASE STUIDES Cyclovia Boulder's Cyclovia is a full day event that takes over several miles of road that brings the Boulder community together in a free outdoor setting, promoting healthy and active living among neighbors. Hundreds of vendors within 10 different zones provide free activities such as dance, climbing, kayaking, cycling workshops, rodeo, running, walking tours of downtown Boulder, yoga, Frisbee, and more. Some workshops are bi-lingual, drawing more participants. People bike, dance, walk, rollerblade, scooter, or travel by some other active mode to get between the zones. Many of the vendors that Boulder Green Streets works with are socially and environmentally responsible companies and organizations, providing the participants of Cyclovia with knowledge about what their local community businesses have to offer. In 2012, around 15,000 people participated in Cyclovia, with 65% arriving to the event by alternative means. In an attemptto increase the number of participants to 20,000 and also increase the number of people arriving by bike, walking, or any alternative to a car, Boulder Green Streets added a new innovation and creativity zone, developed an interactive event app, recruited more socially and environmentally responsible business and organizations to participate, and committed to becoming a zero waste event. Boulder Green Streets supports Boulder businesses and government groups that offer health and active living services and products, as well as local non-profit partners offering programs in sustainability health services and active living, as part of its promotion of healthy, active, and sustainable living. Entity: Bou lder Green Streets Location: Boulder, CO Website:http://www.bouldergreenstreets.org EXHIBITA 1 4 Safe Passage Enforcement Until 2014, Chattanooga police had never enforced the safe passing law—even though it had been on the books since 2007. In general, the safe passage laws present practical challenges to police. Chattanooga Police Chief Fred Fletcher—who has placed new emphasis on enforcing the law—came to the department after serving as a police liaison to the cycling community in Austin, Texas, where officers get training on how to eyeball a three-foot violation. A good rule of thumb, Fletcher said, is to gauge whether the officer on a bike can reach out and touch the car; if so, it's closer than three feet. Despite being a big believer in the training, Fletcher wanted to try new equipment that would improve officers' ability to identify violations. He knew an Austin -based software firm called Codaxus was developing a device to support safe passing laws. The device uses an ultrasound detector to measure the distance between a car and a cyclist. You can obviously tell the difference between 36 inches and 10 inches," said Chris Stanton, a co-founder of Codaxus. However, the margin between two feet and three feet is more subtle, especially when cars are moving quickly. Technology can provide a more precise measurement, Stanton said. The Codaxus device uses an ultrasound detector to measure the distance between the car and the cyclist. A separate camera attached to the handlebars of the bike records a reading of the distance as well as the license plate and model of the vehicle. In Chattanooga, judges have agreed to consider the video archives as evidence of motorists violating the law. Judges have agreed to mandate bike safety classes in lieu of fines for motorists who have been cited. If someone refuses to take the class, however, they could face a maximum fine of $50. In most cases, officers try to use the technology to educate motorists about the law, even going as far as replaying the video to show how the close encounter feels from a biker's perspective. "We're trying to increase empathy and understanding," Fletcher said. "It's dear that very few people are intentionally putting people at risk." The department is trying to raise awareness about the law through marketing too. Some police vehicles have signs on windows that diagram the required distance between vehicles and bikes. Entity: Cityof Chattanooga Location: Chattanooga,TN Website: http://www.chattanooga.gov/police-department 1 5 Bicycle Diversion Program A bicycle "diversion" program allows offending cyclists to take a cycling safety workshop as an alternative to paying a traffic fine, thus diverting them from the system. A new CA law signed by Governor Jerry Brown will make it possible for bicyclists who are ticketed for certain infractions to attend a class on safe bicycle riding and thus reduce theirfines. "When a bicyclist is ticketed for a moving violation in California, they by default receive the same monetary fine as when driving a motor vehicle. This means that with court fees added a stop sign violation can cost around $200, and running a red light around $400," explained Assembly member Richard Bloom. "The penalty should be determined so as to encourage safe behavior and not so punitive that it discourages bicycling altogether, especially for low-income individuals who rely the most on bicycling for everyday transportation." The objective of the diversion alternative is a reduced fine and a more educated and knowledgeable bike rider. Bike East Bay has been working with other advocacy groups to formulate the best programs for local needs. Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition, the City of Long Beach, and the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition have all expressed interest in creating diversion programs. Davis already has an on -campus diversion program and is interested in expanding it citywide. The cities of Huntington Beach and Alameda both used to have programs but suspended them because of a legal prohibition against them in the existing vehicle code. The Marin County Bicycle Coalition already has a diversion program, which it has been able to run because of strong local supportfrom the police and courts. Bike East Bay currently incorporates a diversion program into its regular educational offerings. Like Davis, UC Berkeley has its own police department that issues citations on campus. For on -campus infractions, ticketed bicyclists can attend a class, bring proof of attendance to the police, pay a fee, and have the ticket destroyed. The fee, around $50, is much less than what they would have to pay for a ticket if it went through the court system. "Most police departments will hold a ticket for anywhere from thirty to sixty days before sending it on" to the courts, says Robert Prinz, Education Coordinator for Bike East Bay. "So if ticketed cyclists attend one of our classes during thattime, the ticket never gets sent to the courthouse, so there are no added - on fines, no court costs at all." This system greatly simplifies the entire process by limiting the exchange of moneyto a single transaction between the ticketed individual and the police. Bike East Bay funds its classes through grants, and receives a flatfee for its classes, no matter how many students show up for it. This way it doesn't need to rely on a minimum number of students—nor on a minimum number of ticketed bicyclists— to support its education program and, it can make the classes available to anyonewho wants to take them. There are 33 cities in the East Bay, and Bike East Bay would need to set up agreements with local police departments in all of them. Once a program is approved, said Prinz, individual officers don't even need to have a lot of knowledge about the program. "UC Berkeley police use a sticker on the back of citations that have information about our classes," he said, which include a phone number and information about signing up for classes. Entity: Bike East Bay Location: California(Statewide) Website: www.bikeeastbay.org EXHIBITA CASE STUIDES 81 1 6 Reduce Off-street Parking Requirements 1 7 The cities of Ann Arbor, Michigan, Columbus, Indiana, and Sacramento, California—three cities of different sizes, with different development contexts, and in different parts of the country—have each reduced or eliminated off-street parking requirements downtown and in mixed-use areas, yielding a range of benefits. Lifting onerous parking requirements has promoted infill development by creating more buildable area on infill properties, opening the door to projects that renew derelict building or activate what were previously inactive hardscapes or garbage -strewn lots while helping to create the density that defines a vibrant walkable urban core. None of these three cities has experienced parking shortage or economic losses because of the reduction in required parking. Today, Sacramento's parking code aligns with the visions espoused in the general plan allowing planners to review projects and approve projects wherein developers are given the discretion to decide how much (or how little) parkingto install. Entity: City of Sacramento Location: Sacramento, CA Website: www.portal.c'rtyofsacramento.org/Economic-Development/ 82 CASE STUIDES Bicycle Counts Cambridge has one of the highest percentages of bike commuters in Greater Boston and now, the city has a wayto show it off. If you find yourself biking down Broadway Street in Kendall Square, you can now check out how many cyclists carne before you that day. The city installed a bike counter displayingthe number of cyclistswho passed through the area, according to city spokesperson Cara Seiderman. The new contraption, which displays in big green numerals the daily count of cyclists who have passed the spot, will supplementthe city's bike census, taken every two years. During those counts, employees spread out over 17 locations for four hours and record the cyclists they see. The city then extrapolates that data to come up with the number who pedals through the area. Seiderman said they will not be doing away with the manual count, but officials hope the new bike counter will be more accurate and easier. "We know thata lot of people are traveling by bicycle in Cambridge and that the numbers have been increasingfor more than a decade," City Manager Richard C. Rossi said in a statement. Officials think the counter is a way to show how many people are out biking, and making sure people know "bicyclists count." However, Seide rman said they are also excited about the valuable data they will be able to collect. "If you can get 24/7 data, you have a much better picture of what the patterns are, she said. "We can see if they're biking year- round or bikingthrough the rain." Officials believe the counter is the first of its kind in the state. With it, Cambridge joins the ranks of such bike -friendly cities as Portland, OR, and Montreal. The counter from the Montreal-based Eco -Counter company was funded by a $25,000 grant from the Helen and William Mazer Foundation. The machine resetsatmidnight, ensuring a fresh daily count. A less prominent estimate of the annual bike tally is also be displayed. Ent ity: City of Cambridge Location: Cambridge, MA Website: www.cambridgema.gov/traffic/news/2015/07/permanentbicyclecounteronbroadway EXHIBITA SPECIAL TOPICS NARRATIVE 1. Bike Share Programs 84 2. Walking School Buses and Bike Trains 87 3. Local Improvement Districts 87 4. Special Maintenance Agreements 88 5. Cyclovia 88 6. Safe Passage Citation Fee Structure 88 7. Rules and Codes for Safe Cycling 88 8. Bike Safety Classes in Lieu of Fines 90 9. Standard Contracting Language for Construction Zones 90 10. Bicycle Counts 90 11. Performance Measures 91 EXHIBITA 83 SPECIAL TOPICS NARRATIVES Bike Share Programs A Bike Share is a non -motorized transportation service, typically structured to provide users point-to- point transportation for short distance trips (usually around Yz to 3 miles), that allows users to pick up a bicycle at any self -serve bike station in the network and return it to another bike station near their destination. Since 2010, bike share systems have been introduced in over 30 cities in the US and have supported over 36 million bike share trips. As bike share growsmore common, it is increasingly becominga key urban amenity for global cities. Bike share programs extend the reach of existing transit, make one-way bike trips possible, and eliminate some barriers to riding such as bike ownership, storage, maintenance and concerns about theft. Bike share can provide new mobility options for people of all income levels and can play a key role in improving public health byfacilitating an active lifestyle. Bike share has evolved significantly since its inception in 1965, when Amsterdam city council member Luud Schimmelpennink proposed the world's first public bike share system as a way to reduce automobile traffic in the city center. He proposed that 20,000 bicycles be painted white and distributed for pick-up and drop-off anywhere in the city center, free of charge. When the city council rejected the proposal, Schimmelpennink's supporters distributed fifty donated white bikes for free use around the town. The next attempt at a bike -share system occurred in La Rochelle, France in 1993, which offered a free, but more regulated, program that allowed the public to check out bicycles for two hours. Cambridge, England, implemented a similar system in the same year. This type of free bicycle rental system, also known as a "bicycle library," reduced problems with theft and vandalism since users were required to show identification and leave a deposit in order to use the bicycle. However, these bicycle libraries also required the user to return the bike to the same place from which it had been checked out, limiting the usefulness of the system as a point-to-pointtransit option. In order for a bike share system to be efficient and well utilized, it must be properly planned and designed. The density of bike share station and nearby destinations is a key consideration in planning bike share programs, which is why central business districts are often well suited for implementing such programs, particularly in the pilot phase. Definitions • Bike Share Station: structure that holds the automated customer terminal/kiosk and docks that dispense bikes. • Dock:mechanism thatretains bikes in an uprightand locked position. • Terminal: self -serve kiosks, like those found at transit locations, where users can get information and make payments to checkout bicycles. • Rebalancing/Redistribution: process by which bicycles are redistributed throughout the service area to ensure that each bike share station has an appropriate ratio of available docks and bikes to ensure optimum service; typically 50% bikes to 50% open docks. 84 SPECIAL TOPICS NARRATIVE • Station -less bike share: emergingtechnology that utilizes an electronic locking system based on GPS and wireless communications (cell phone). Security and checkout infrastructure is located on each bike to transmit usage and location data and monitor maintenance and unauthorized use. Business Models Publicly Owned and Operated: The jurisdiction pays the up -front capital cost, and owns the infrastructure and equipment (i.e. bicycles and bike stations). The jurisdiction may work with a private contractor which handles membership management, customer service, marketing, bicycle redistribution, data management, and maintenance of stations and bicycles. Under such an arrangement, the government accepts financial responsibility for the program, while the private contractor accepts liability exposure. Nonprofit: A nonprofit organization manages operations and service. The nonprofit may be explicitly created for the operation of the bike share program, or bike sharing service may be added to the purview of an existing organization. Local jurisdictions typically participate in one of two ways in this model: 1) the nonprofit organization receives startup funding and some funding for operations from local and state governments; and/or 2) the local jurisdiction acts as a fiscal agent to request federal funding and passes funds to the nonprofit. This model removes most of the financial liability from the jurisdiction and places it on the nonprofit organization, which is responsible for both fundraising and managing operational revenues and expenditures. Private/for Profit: A private company provides, owns and operates the service; government involvement may be limited to certain aspects of planning for the stations, such as the issuing of necessary public space permits. To cover permitting costs for the use of public space, the private bike share company may be required to provide a percentage of profits (typically around 10-25%). To generate additional profits, the bike sharing company may sell advertising space on its bicycles and/or stations. Itis important to note that several successful European bike share models, including Paris and Barcelona, use this approach. System Planningand Design Station Location (see -attached map of proposed station locations) • Station spacing is key • Where feasible, stations should be located: • Where increased population and job densities positively impact ridership • Proximal to transit stops or hubs to facilitate connectivity • Along existing network of bike infrastructure or on streets that are accommodating to bicycles in scale and activity • In locations that are clearly visible from multiple approaches and maximize pedestrian circulation and accessibility • Between multiple destinations that generate activity atd ifferenttime of day EXHIBITA Station Density and Level of Service • Target density: 8-16 stations per square half mile and is highly context dependent Y Target supply: 10-30 bikes per 1K residents/tourists in the program coverage area Y Target docking space to bike ratio: 2-2.5 docking spaces per bike in system Station Type and Design Manual vs. Automated: Systems can be either manual or automated. In a manual system, an attendant records the user's information and helps with checking bikes in and out (including payment). Automated systems allow users to check bikes in or out and make payments electronically, either at the terminal or kiosk or directly at the docking station. These types of systems often use specialized key cards. Modular vs. Permanent: Modular stations are designed to be moved to allow maximal flexibility in network configuration. They are typically constructed on a base that is then bolted into the concrete or asphalt; many modular station designs include solar power. Permanent stations typically takes typically involve excavation and trenchingto reach the power source. Docking Styles Docking Spaces: Each space docks one bicycle. The number of spaces determines the size of the station's footprint, enabling station size to be adjusted to fit the available space. This style of dock takes up more space per bike than cycle parking areas but may be better suited for an urban environment. Bicycles are checked out at either the terminal or atthe actual docking space, depending on the station design. Cycle Parking Area: Bicycles are stored on racks in a secured area. Cycle parking areas are a good option for larger stations (more than 50 bicycles) because cycle parking racks can hold more bikes per square meter than docking spaces. At stations with cycle parking areas, bicycles are checked in and out manually or through a turnstile. Because these stations require a secure area that is fenced or walled off, they can be more intrusive in the urban landscape. Software and Payment Mechanisms Most systems use card technology (smart cards, magnetic cards, or credit cards) to check bikes in and out. Key considerations include: • How customers register and pay for the system • How bikes are check in and out from docking spaces • How information is transmitted both internally for management and externally for customers Table 9: Financial Models for Bike Share Programs Capital Cost and Financing Stations (terminal docking spaces) Software Station Installation Coordination and Oversight Maintenance Operations (staffing) User Fees* Sponsorship Opportunities Capital Cost Bicycles (tubeless and chainless) Maintenance Depot/Control Center (annual update) Replacement/Maintenance Hardware Operating Costs Potential Revenue Sources Marketing Insurance Advertising Sales Private Investmen *User Fees - Depends on business model and relative importance of defraying system costs Option Hourly Range ($) $2 - $8 (first 15 min. free) Individual Daily Membership $3 - $30 Individual Weekly Membership $9 - $30 Individual Monthly Membership $20 - $40 Individual Annual Membership $13 - $95 Corporate Annual Membership $35 - $50 /employee** **Corporate Annual Memberships can include unlimited free trips up to 30 minutes Sponsorship Opportunities • Whole system capital cost underwriting • Whole system operations underwriting • Individual station capital cost underwriting Y Individual bicycle capital cost underwriting Y In-kind marketing support Advertising Sales • Individual station • Individual bicycle EXHIBITA Indirect Savings • Reduced shuttle operation/costs by area hotel • Increased pedestrian traffic to area restaurants and retail • Increased transit ridership • Effective expansion of CBD/tourist district SPECIAL TOPICS NARRATIVE 85 PRELIMINARY PROPOSED BIKE SHARE STATION LOCATIONS OPreliminaryProposed BI ke Share Stations Low Cost/Rapid Implementation Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Intermediary Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Intermediary Treatment Multi -use Siidepath (one side) as Intermediary Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 86 1 -way Cycle Track (both ways) Multi -use Sidepath (one side); pink indicates side of street on which facility should be installed Off Road M u Iti-use Trail TBD: Corridor study recommended D z O Location: Downtown and North Beach area. Corpus Christi, TX 2 Walking School Buses and Bicycle Trains Walkingtogetherto Badin Elementary School in Badin, North Carolina. A walking school bus and bicycle train both consist of groups of students accompanied by adults that walk or bicycle a pre -planned route to school. Routes can originate from a particular neighborhood or, in order to include children who live too far to walk or bicycle, begin from a designated parking lot. They may operate daily, weekly or monthly. Often, they are started in order to address parents' concerns about traffic and personal safetywhile providing a chance forparents and children to socialize. Walking school buses and bicycle trains can be loosely structured or highly organized. For example, walking buses or bicycle trains can be as simple as neighborhood families deciding to walk or bicycle together, possibly sharing parental chaperoning on a rotating basis. More formal, organized walking school buses and bicycle have a coordinator at the school or district level who recruits volunteers and participants, creates a schedule and designs a walking route. While requiring more effort, more structuredwalking school buses and bicycle trains offerthe opportunity to involve more children. Quick steps to a walking school bus or bicycle train Loose/informal structure: 1. Invite families who live nearby to walk or 3. Decide how often the group will travel bicycle as a group together 2. Pick a route and take a test walk or ride 4. Start walking or bicycling Highly organized/formal structure: 1. Determine the amount of interest in a walking school bus or bicycle train 2. Contact potential participants and partners and identify a coordinator 3. Identify route(s) 4. Identify a sufficient number of adults to supervise walkers or bicyclists; (The Centers for Disease Control recommends one adult per three children for children ages 4 to 6 and one adult for six children for older elementary children ages 7 to 9 (2000); for bicyclists, one adult per three to six children is recommended) 5. Finalize logistical details including setting a time schedule, training volunteers and promoting participation 6. Promote and host a kickoff event 7. Trackparticipation 8. Make changes to the activity as needed 3 Local Improvement Districts A Local Improvement District (Improvement District) is a method of financing capital improvements constructed by the city that provide a special benefit to the properties within the boundary of the Improvement District. The Improvement District formation process leads to the sale of bonds and the retirement of those bonds via annual payments paid by the property owners within the district. The Improvement District assessments become lienson the benefitted properties. Existing language for municipal laws: City of Corpus Christi, TX (Ord. No. 027066,§ 8,12-1-2006) Assessment and improvement districts - (a) The city shall have the power to establish assessment districts, in the manner hereinafter provided, for the purpose of constructing public improvements within said districts and to provide that the cost of making any such improvements shall be paid by the property owners owning property specially benefited by reason of making the improvements. The city may levy a special assessment as a lien against any such property and issue certificates of obligation covering the cost of such improvements bearing interest not to exceed the maximum legal rate. No assessment district shall be created withoutfirst submitting the question to a vote of the qualified voters in the city who own real estate in the proposed district. If the returns of the election show thattwo-thirds or more of the qualified voters of the city who own real estate in the proposed assessment district voting in the election voted in favor of the proposition, the city council shall create the assessment district and establish its boundaries. All matters pertaining to any assessment lien for public improvements shall be made in substantial compliance with the laws pertainingto street improvements. (b) The city shall have power to establish improvement districts, in the manner hereinafter provided, in order to assist in the development of commerce, tourism, resort activity, and convention accommodation for the promotion of the welfare of the city. Within any such improvement district, the city council shall have the power to lease, sublease or provide for the installment sale of any city - owned improved or unimproved land, or any interest therein, for any governmental or private use, at its fair market value as determined bythe city council withoutthe necessity of voter approval. The term of any such transaction shall not exceed sixty years. An improvement district under this subsection shall be established by the council subject to approval by a majority vote of the qualified voters of the city voting at an election called for approval of the establishment of the district. The metes and bounds description of any such district, as approved by election, shall be kept on file in the office of the city secretary as part of the public records of the city, and any improvement district established by Charter amendment prior to the adoption of this provision shall be maintained in full force and effect and shall be subjectto the provisions of this section. City of Portland, TX Requestby property ownersfor street improvements study - The owners of real property abutting a public street located within the city may request of the city a preliminary engineering study and report concerning improvement of all or part of such street by presentingto the city engineer a letter of requestfor consideration of a street improvement project. The request shall be submitted on forms made available by the office of the city engineer. Such letter of request must specify the proposed length and location of the portion of the street for which the study is requested, and must be signed by persons constituting at least fifty-one (51) percent of the property owners and owning at least fifty-one (51) percent of the property frontage involved in the requested improvement study. Such letter of request shall designate one (1) property owner residing on such street as the representative of the property owners filing the request for communications with the city engineer and city staff. EXHIBITA SPECIAL TOPICS NARRATIVE 87 4 Special Maintenance Agreements Planning for and investing in operation and maintenance (O&M) is key to maximizing the return on investments in bicycle infrastructure. Traditional centralized systems for O&M, which are the responsibility of municipalities and utilities, may not be adequate to address all O&M needs in the face of conflicting budgetary priorities; in such cases, community- or user -based systems for supporting O&M may yield increased efficiency, benchmarking, raise awareness/debate, and improved resource allocation. The keys to improving operation and maintenance—and hence resource efficiency and sustainability—are the availability of accurate information aboutthe relative condition of infrastructure and the distribution of clear roles and responsibilities. The creation of special maintenance agreement between municipalities and neighborhoods allow the neighborhoods to spearhead maintenance of bicycle infrastructure. Under such agreements, the neighborhood may commit to keeping the bicycle infrastructure free of litter, debris and graffiti, and/or agree to be responsible fora variable number of cleanups each yearfor a specific duration of time. Jr Cyclovia Cyclovia is a Spanish term that means cycle way, either a permanent bike path or the closing of certain streets or cyclists and pedestrians. Cyclovia has its origins in Columbia and the inspiration is credited to Bogota. Each Sunday and on public holidays from 7am until 2pm certain main streets of Bogota, Cali, Medellin, and other municipalities are closed to cars to grant runners, skaters, and bicyclists safe and unfettered use. At the same time, stages are often set up in city parks and aerobics instructors, yoga teachers and musicians lead people through various performances. Cyclovias have gained a following in Australia, Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, and in a number of cities in the United States. Successful US cyclovias include Durham, NC; Fort Collins, CO; and in the Lone Star State in Austin, Fort Worth, El Paso, and San Antonio. 6 Safe Passage Citation Fee Structure Law enforcement plays an essential role in supporting bicycle travel by reducing unsafe operation of motor vehicles and bicycles and by reminding the public about the legal rights and duties of road users. Police officers, prosecutors, and judges should treat bicyclists as full and equal road users in the investigation, citation, and prosecution of traffic laws, and in assigning fault/liability and awarding damages. The State of Texas Safe Passage Law S.B. No. 1416, effective September 1, 2015, requires cars to provide cyclists with a three foot buffer; trucks must allow six feet of clearance. The City of Corpus Christi adopted an analogous ordinance on May 15, 2012, under which violations are considered a Class C misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of no more than $500. Opinions vary about preferred fee structure for violations of Safe Passage ordinances. Data from other communities suggests that law enforcement officials may be more inclined to cite motorists for violating Safe Passage laws if the fee is minimal (–$50 for first time offenders, up to –$150 for repeat offenses). Critics of this perspective argue that the number of citations issued is limited by the challenge of 88 SPECIAL TOPICS NARRATIVE enforcing the law, i.e. observing the violation and judging the distance, rather than by enforcement officials' opinion aboutthe severity of the penalty. Likewise, proponents of stricter penalties argue that the law is designed to protect vulnerable users—cyclists—and thus must be stringent enough to inspire motorists to change their behavior. Local law enforcement officials should be partyto any local dialogue aimed at optimizing Safe Passage laws and fee structure atthe local level. 7 Rules and Codes for Safe Cycling Potential fodderforlocal safe cycling codes includes: Basic Rules of the Road 1. First come, first served – Everyone on the road is entitled to the lane width they need. This includes the space behind, to each side and the space in front. If you want to use someone else's space, you mustyield to whoever is using it. 2. Drive on the right half of the road - n the United States, everyone must drive on the right-hand side of the roadway. 3. Stop/yield before entering a busier roadway - When you come to an intersection, if you do not have the right of way,you mustyield. 4. Look/yield before moving laterally - If you want to change lanes, you must yield to traffic that is in your new lane of travel. 5. Practice destination positioning at intersections -Bikes can share the same lane with other drivers. If a lane is wide enough to share with another vehicle (about 14 feet), ride three feetto the right of traffic. If the lane is not wide enough to share, "take the lane" by riding in the middle. 6. Practice speed positioning between intersections -The slowest vehicles on the road should be the furthest to the right. Where you position yourself on the road depends on the location of anyparked cars, your speed, and your destination. Always pass on the left. Signaling Bicyclists are required to use the proper hand signals when turning, changing lanes or stopping: • Reduced shuttle operation/costs by area hote I • Increased pedestriantrafficto area restaurants and retail • Increased transit ridership • Effective expansion of CBD/tourist district EXHIBITA Helmet Laws Most states require the use of bicycle helmets to some degree, often for children under the age of 16 or 18, and local ordinances in many US cities exceed requirements in their respective states by requiring helmets for cyclists of all ages. The following are examples of municipal bicycle helmet laws within the state of Texas. City Ages Effective Year Arlington Under 18 1997 Austin Under 18 1996/97 Bedford Under 16 1996 Benbrook Under 17 1996 Coppell Under 15 1997 Dallas Under 18 1996/2014 Fort Worth Under 18 1996 Houston Under 18 1995 Southlake Under 15 1999 Local codes addressing helmet use typically include language such as: Any person from the ages of (defined locally), riding or otherwise moving on a bicycle, including any passenger thereon and/or person being towed thereby, on any public area in the City shall wear an approved helmet, and shall have either the neck or chin strap of the helmetfastened securelywhile the device is in motion. Standard Definitions: "Approved helmet" means a head covering designed for safety that shall meet or exceed the requirements safety of standards adopted bythe U.S. Consumer Product safety Commission (CPSC) 15 USCS 6004, or such subsequent nationally recognized standard for helmet performance as the city may adopt. The helmet must be equipped with either a neck or chinstrap that shall be fastened securelywhile the wheeled -vehicle is in motion. "Bicycle" means every device propelled solely by human power upon which a person or persons may ride, having two tandem wheels either of which is eleven inches or more in diameter, or three wheels, any one of which is more than twenty inches in diameter. Within this ordinance, the term "bicycle" shall include anyattached trailers, side cars, and/or other device beingtowed by a bicycle. Lights and Reflectors In virtually every state, bicyclists are required to have red lights on the back and white lights on the front while riding at night. Details vary between individual state and local laws. Texas: Musthave a white light on the front and a red reflector or red light on the rear (for riding at night): (551.1046, effective September, 2001). Ridingon Sidewalks Some communities—particularly in those with robust bicycling infrastructure—may opt to enact codes that prohibit bicyclists over a certain age (13 in San Francisco, for example) from biking on sidewalks. However, in communities with fledgling cycling culture and/or particularly dominant driving culture, the adoption of local codes that expressly permit cycling on city streets and sidewalks as a by right use (except where explicitly indicated otherwise by signage or other equivalent notification) may help to foster cycling culture by alleviating uncertainty among the general public and law enforcement officials about where cyclists are permitted. Such codes should clearly indicate that cyclists must yield to pedestrians on all shared facilities. Stop Signs and Stoplights As with motorists, bicyclists must come to a complete stop at all stop signs and red lights. Consistent enforcement of this particular requirement, where covered state and/or local codes, can be an important strategy in promoting safe cycling and fostering a sense of equity among motorists who may otherwise be critical of whatthey perceive as disproportionate leniencyforcyclists. As with enforcement of Safe Passage ordinances among motorists, the fee structure for enforcement of stop sign/red light violations by cyclists is an important consideration, and local law enforcement officials are key stakeholders in the discussion. Officials may be less inclined to cite cyclists if they perceive the penalties to be unduly stiff; conversely, if fees for violators are not sever enough, they will not inspire the desired change in behavior and may be perceived as inequitably by motorists, thus breedingresentment. Encroachmenton Bicycle Infrastructure Local codes must provide clear, explicit authority for citation of encroachments and/or degradation of public cycling infrastructure. Parked vehicles, overgrown foliage, trash receptacles, and other such infringements on bike infrastructure pose a very serious safety risk to the cycling public and must be addressed swiftly and with the appropriate severity so as to deter repeat offense. The creation, as recommended in this plan, of a dedicated telephone hotline and smartphone application for use by the public in reporting such encroachments can be a meaningful contribution to the efficiency of code enforcement operations, butthe efficacy of such a tool depends on the passage of local codes that allow for appropriate response by code enforcementofficia Is. Applicability of Traffic Laws Sample language: Every person riding a bicycle upon a street or sidewalk shall be granted all of the rights and shall be subject to all of the duties applicable to the driver of a vehicle by the laws of this state declaring rules of the road applicable to vehicles, this Code XXX or other ordinances of this city applicable to the driver of a vehicle, except as to those provisions of laws and ordinances which by their nature can have no application, and except as otherwise provided in this chapter available code language. EXHIBITA SPECIAL TOPICS NARRATIVE 89 8 Bike Safety Classes in Lieu of Fines 1 0 DrivelGnd RideKind was jointly developed by the Austin -based nonprofit Please BE KIND to Cyclists (Please BE KIND) and the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to promote safe driving practices by motorists as they share Texas roads with vulnerable road users such as cyclists and pedestrians. The mission of Drive Kind RideKind is to educate and inspire all road users to encourage personal responsibility and foster behavioral change to enhance safety. The program includes a video and program guide. The program guide is made up of 7 sections and corresponding video segments: Section 1: ATrue Story Section 2: Awareness Section 3: Infrastructure Section 4: Distractions Section5: Crashes Section6: Sharing the Road Section 7: Personal Responsibility The program includes topics for class discussion and key take -a -ways. Instructors, school owners and administrators, and the public are welcome and encouraged to request, view, download, and share the DriveKind Ride Kind video. Most notably the program is free and implementation is flexible. Municipalities can develop 1-2 hour long classes or half-day workshops with the program focusing on aspects of the program that address specifi c community needs. 9 Standard Contracting Language for Construction Zones When planning major roadway projects, construction and development guidelines should require contractors to provide continuous access to pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure so as to minimize disruption to the commuting public. The Traffic Control Plan that is typically developed as part of the planning processfor roadway projects is the appropriate place to address this need. Language found in the General Notes for Traffic Control might be enhance to read as follows: Contractor shall provide continuous access to all business and residential driveways during the construction period. Contractor shall also provide safe and well -signed continuous access to pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure and/or alternate pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure during construction period." 90 SPECIAL TOPICS NARRATIVE Bicycle Counts One of the more significant problems for advocates of active mobility is the dearth of accurate bicycle use data. Knowing how many people are bicycling informs demand for infrastructure, provides feedback on the value of existing facilities, identifies needed improvements, helps compare safety between modes, and bolsters local support for active mobility. The lack of data is also problematic when apportioningtransportation dollars. There is national recognition of the need to collect more and better data for bicycling. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has launched a "Bicycle -Pedestrian Count technology Pilot Program" with ten Metropolitan Planning Organizationsto collectthis data. At the state level, a Washington State Department of Transportation research initiative, in conjunction with Portland State University developed a bicycle and pedestrian miles traveled metric estimate for Washington State. A second phase is underway to develop tools for implementation of the methodology. EXHIBITA 1 1 Performance Measures Periodic prog am evaluation is critical to assess progress toward stated plan objectives. Program evaluation provides accountability to the public (and those who fund projects or programs) and thus may help bolstercommunity supportfor program investments and expansion. Category Metric Suggested Source of Data Evaluation Period Quality of Bicycle Infrastructure Total percent build out of Bicycle Mobility Network Annual Municipal Engineering Dept./MPO Number of miles of bike infrastructure (built in conformance with Bike Mobility Plan in terms of location and infrastructure type) per capita Annual Municipal Engineering Dept/MPO Total annual munidpal capital spending on bicycle infrastructure Annual Municipal Engineering Dept. Proportion of respondents (to community survey implemented every 3 -years) who cite the poor condition of existing bike facilities as a reason for not riding more often 3 Vears MPO Bicycle Safety Number (city-wide) of reported bike/vehicle interactions Annual Munidpal Police Depts. Number (city-wide) of reported vehicle crashes of any' type Annual Munidpal Police Depts. Number (City-wide) of fixed (permanent) signs related to safe cycling installed within the project area Annual Municipal Traffic/ Engineering Dept. Total annual munidpal expenditures on bike safety outreach/awareness (PSAs, vehicle wraps, city -sponsored safety courses) Annual Munidpal P10/ and/or PD Percentage of grade schools (grades 1-12) with some form of designated Safe Routes to School Program Annual School Districts Proportion of respondents (to community survey implemented every 3 -years) who cite not feeling safe from vehicles on existing bike facilities as a reason for not riding more often 3 Vears MPO Proportion of respondents (to community survey implemented every 3 -years) who cite feeling that local drivers are too aggressive toward cyclists as a reason for not riding more often 3 Vears MPO Category Metric Suggested Source of Data Evaluation Period Bicycle Demand Bicycle counts on select corridors as part of existing municipal traffic count program; when possible, counts should be instituted on a given corridor before and after the construction of infrastructure prescribed in this plan Annual Munidpal Traffic/ Engineering Dept. Bike hoardings on transit on a route -specific basis as a proportion of available rack space Annual RTA Number of zero -car households, total and per demographic categories (race, gender, household income level) 10 Vears Census Number of bike commuter rates, total and per demographic categories (race, gender, household income level) 10 Years Census Number of registered Strava Metro commuters and in the number of commuter trips logged per month Annual Strava/MPO Number of requests submitted monthly through telephone hotline/smartphone app regarding encroachments/repair on bike infrastructure Annual (average monthlytotals) Munidpal Streets Dept. Percentage of students (grades 1-12) who bike to school at least one day per week Annual School Districts Proportion of respondents (to community survey implemented every 3 -years) who report riding a bike (for any reason) at least once per week 3 Vears MPO Proportion of respondents (to community survey implemented every 3 -years) who indicate that the vision defined in this plan accurately describes their vision for the future of their community 3 Vears MPO Number of business certified as Bike Friendly Businesses" Annual Chamber of Commerce (or other sponsor of BPB Certification Program) *data from other communities suggest thatthe installation of bicycle infrastructure is associated with areduction in vehicular crashes fall types) **through certification program recommended in this plan EXHIBITA SPECIAL TOPICS NARRATIVE 91 10115 1. t f • EXHIBITA APPENDICES Appendix A: Stakeholder Engagement Database Appendix B: Steering Committee Invitees Appendix C: ANSWER IT! Online Survey and Data Summary Appendix D: Presentation Locations Appendix E: Community Events Attended Appendix F: Poster and Flyer Locations Appendix G: Interview Protocol and List of Interviewees Appendix H: Targeted Vetting of Preliminary Bicycle Mobility Plan Appendix I: Sample Resolution in Support of Implementation of the Bicycle Mobility Network Appendix J: Drive Kind Ride Kind Program Guide Appendix K: Model Bicycle Parking Ordinance Appendix L: Priority Sport Routes for Road Bikes EXHIBITA A-1 A-1 A-2 A-6 A-6 A-7 A-8 A-9 A-9 A-1 1 A-1 2 A-1 8 APPENDICES Appendix A: Stakeholder Engagement Database C.S.N Pack .259 11 -Mt on Pan, Commt. Bar A-1 APPENDICES Appendix B: Steering Committee Invitees Entity Corpus Christi EDC Delegate Lain Vasey Title CEO/President Corpus Christi ISD Dr. Roland Hernandez Superintendent City of Gregory Robert Meager Chief of Police City of Portland Brian DeLatte, P.E Assistant City Manager Jamie Pyle, P.E. Director of Public Works Coastal Bend Center for Ind. Living Judy Telge Director of Development City of Corpus Christi Bicycle & Pedestrian Subcommittee Gretchen Arnold Chair Capital Programs Jeff Edmonds, P.E Director of Engineering Services Jerry Shoemaker, P.E Senior Program Manager Development Services Dan Grimsbo Director of Development Services Island StrategicAction Committee Greg Smith Chair Parks &Recreation Jay Ellington Director Stade Talbert Anaya Assistant Director Corpus Christi Police Department Michael Markle (Then) Interim Police Chief Mark Schauer Assistant Chief of Investigations Bureau Ronald Zirbes Senior Officer Street Maintenance & Repairs Dan Grimsbo Director of Development Services Transportation Advisory Commission Scott Harris, P.E Chair Traffic Engineering Dr. Raymond Chong, P.E Director of Traffic Engineering Convention &Visitors Bureau Elvia Aguilar Director of Brand Management Corpus Christi Housing Authority Gary Allsup Director Del Mar College Mark Escamilla President Downtown Management District Terry Sweeney Executive Director North Beadi Community Association Carrie Robertson Meyer President Nueces County Glen Sullivan, P.E Director of Public Works Port of Corpus Christi Authority Natasha Fudge, P.E. Project Engineer/Planner Regional Transportation Authority Gordon Robinson, PMP Director of Planning San Pat County Dolores Hinojosa ROW Coordinator San Patrido County EDC Becky McMillon Director SEA District Association Bill Durril General Manager TAMUCC Amanda Drum Executive Director, Strategic Engagement & Initiatives TxDOT- Planning Victor Vourcos, P.E Director of Development Services EXHIBITA Appendix C: ANSWER IT! Online Survey and Data Summary How often do you ride a bicycle? How often do you use a bicycle for TRANSPORTATION (instead of a car or bus to reach a destination)? Answered 222 Skipped:1 Answered: 195 Skipped:28 Daily At least once per week 1-4 timm per month Lessthan a dozen times ... I do not ride a bike • 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 30% 90% 100% 11g:onus At least once per week 59 1-4 times per month Lesstnan a dozen timeS per y,e, 45 I do not ride a Me Daily At least once per week 1-4times per month Less than a dozen times ... I do not ever use a bicycl... r 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 30% 90% 100% ..1114.19. Dal, 13.05% 27 At least once per week 16.92%. 33 1-4 times per montll 36 Lesstnan a dozen times per,. 20.51% 40 I do not ever UbU e bicycle tor I HANSDOHINIION 30.36% 59 T414 195 EXHIBIT A APPENDICES A-2 Appendix C: ANSWER IT! Online Survey and Data Summary (con't) Which of the following prevent you from riding a bike more often How likely would you be to use each of the following amenities? (select all that apply)? Absence of bike facilit... Poor condition (e.g. debris... I don't feel safe from... Stray dogs Local drivers aretoo... Lack of secure bike parking... Answered, 218 Skipped, 5 The bike racks I on the buses... There is no place to sho... Other (please specify) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 30% 90% 100% Absence M (e g bike lanes or paths) along the streets on M. I d like to ride 169 Hoor condition (e g debris in bilm lane) ot misting bilm tacilities 132 I dont teel sate tromvenicles on tne exiMing tacilities 7248% 1,8 Stray dogs 30.64% 4, Local drivers are too aggressive toward cyclists 66.60% 121 Lack of secure bike parking M. des.atior. 36.78% 78 The bike racks onthe buses I ride are usually full There is no place to shower andor change where I work Other (please speCiN) 37 A-3 APPENDICES 218 Free bike safety cours... Free bike safety cours... Free bike maintenance"... Free bike maintenance"... Free printed map of bike... informationai website Telephone nothne to... On-line form to report bi... Free smartphone b... 2 • 3 4 6 7 Answered, 211 Skippeci,12 3 nlY7T8 5776774.''' '77 Mee bike Safe, COMSe. ...Weekend Free kke Safe, COMSe. eVernng MMSOnWeekendS n'leOndS=err„errt:,e"r k'SkS Mee b. maintenan.repaimuume Ru Morale we.ends erieeenrgehgTsTrXerrr 'uurbe'ru lyrg(Per'9'eu=biTe7aTetesenperr' t"t 'd= 0:t'rre't'er lend'i7cTtr=ea'rrno7T,MWrsS Sehed'e eV ents s'en Telephone hotline to report bike Mc. maintenance issue/safety concern On line torm to repo.. tacill, Maintenance issuelsat. mmer, Mee smartprone Me rout, planning a. —17 77 77 77 208 77 202 20] 53 209 46 204 209 65 210 ala 20] 707 20] EXHIBIT A Appendix C: ANSWER IT! Online Survey and Data Summary (con't) How accurately does the following statement describe your vision for the future of your community? The metropolitan area of the Coastal Bend is a place where walking and biking are integral to the community culture and represent viable, safe travel and recreation options for residents and visitors of diverse abilities. 1. This statement do... 2. This statemmt.. 3. This statement.. Answered: 204 Skipped: 19 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 30% 90% 100% Response. 1 This statement does not describe ere visionloMhe future of my communrly at all 2 This statement partial, describes my vision for the future of roe communi, 45 3 This statement accurately describes ere vision for the Mture M ere communrly 149 Q6 In which zip code do you live? 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 202 Skipped: 21 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% /UM 0 00, EXHIBIT A 202 APPENDICES A-4 Appendix C: ANSWER IT! Online Survey and Data Summary (con't) How old are you? Answered: 199 Skipped:24 10-15 16-18 19-22 23-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70• • 1 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 9461,4.666 1 618 1.5114 19-22 23-29 28 3639 PPM 4649 76, Total A-5 APPENDICES fi 199 Q8 Are you a full-time student? Yes No Answered: 198 Skipped: 25 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Responses 28 No Q9 Gender? Male Female Answered: 201 Skipped: 22 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% M ale emale EXHIBITA 97 Appendix D: Presentation Locations Date Audience 03/10/2015 City of Corpus Christi City Council 04/01/2015 Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority 04/10/2015 Corpus Christi Chamber of Commerce Infrastructure Group 04/13/2015 Coastal Bend Bays and Estuaries Foundation 05/07/2015 City of Corpus Christi Mayor's Breakfast 05/13/2015 Texas Sodety of Professional Engineers, Corpus Christi Chapter 05/14/2015 City of Corpus Christi Mayor's Fitness Council 05/20/2015 City of Corpus Christi Transportation Advisory Committee, Bicycle & Pedestrian Subcommittee 06/01/2015 Corpus Christi Cycling Club, Corpus Christi Triathlon Club, i-quack/South Side Cyding Club 06/04/2015 Hour Bluff Business Association 06/04/2015 Corpus Christi Greater Hospitality Association 06/24/2015 Physical Activity Coalition for Nueces County 07/07/2015 Local Emergency Planning Committee 07/07/2015 City of Portland City Council 07/14/2015 young Business Professionals 07/17/2015 Corpus Christi Air Quality Group 07/23/2015 Portland Chamber of Commerce 08/27/2015 Nueces County Safe Communities 09/21/2015 City of Corpus Christi Transportation Advisory Committee, Bicycle & Pedestrian Subcommittee 09/22/2015 Island Strategic Action Committee (select officers) 09/23/2015 Braselton Homes 09/23/2015 North Beach Community Association 10/22/2015 Corpus Christi Association of Realtors 11/03/2015 American Diabetes Association 11/19/2015 City of Corpus Christi Ad Hoc Infrastructure Committee (Chair only) 12/08/2015 West Oso Integrated School District 01/05/2016 City of Corpus Christi Transportation Advisory Committee (including Bicycle & Pedestrian Subcommittee) 01/11/2016 Portland Rotary Club 02/08/2016 Portland Integrated School District Appendix E: Community Events Attended Public outreach at fifteen events during the summer of 2015 included project introduction and overview, distribution of informational flyers, and in-depth interviews with receptive participants. The intent was to reach a greater diversity of community membersthan would typically have participated by attending a public meeting. Date 05/16/2015 Event Beach to Bay Reached 100 Note Flyers&people 05/27/2015 Farmer's Market 15 Flyers & people 05/29/2015 A La Mano (Food Truck Fridays) 50 Flyers & people 05/30/2015 It's Your Life 5K 20 Flyers & people 06/05/2015 Art Walk 38 Flyers & people; 8 In-depth Interviews 06/13/2015 Juneteenth 35 Flyers & people; 5ln-depth Interviews 06/13/2015 Portland Dog Park/ 5K Bike Race & Pet Karnival 25 Flyers & people; 5ln-depth Interviews 06/17/2015 CC7D Brew & Film Crews 50 Flyers & people 06/19/2015 Olympic Day Celebration 43 Flyers & people; 1 ln-depth Interviews 06/19/2015 Garcia Library 32 Flyers & people; 1 ln-depth Interviews 06/20/2015 Stadse Dash 5K 50 Flyers & people; 6 ln-depth Interviews 06/23/2015 Hooks Baseball Game (Tuesday night) 120 Flyers & people; 8 In-depth Interviews 06/24/2015 McDonald Library — Flyers 07/18/2015 Ride -In Theater4 In-depth Interview 07/23/2015 BMX Interviews 20 Flyers & people; 2 ln-depth Interviews EXHIBITA APPENDICES A-6 Appendix F: Poster and Flyer Locations In an effort to supplement the outreach done at community events, flyers and posters were left at businesses and organizations around the project area to bring awareness to the public about the project. At each location, stacks of 10 or more flyers were left in easily accessible areas. If a bulletin board or poster area had room, a poster was left as well. Locations were selected both to cover a wide geographic area and to target specific bike -friendly or bike -accessible businesses. Approximately 900 flyers were left at more than 50 businesses. 6 Points Downtown Flour Bluff Hester's Executive Surf Club La Playa Bleu Frog Mercantile House of Rock Fun Trackers Price's Chef Restaurant Axis Tattoo La Palma Good Shepherd Resale Youga yoga Coffee Waves All Good Downtown Fitness Flex Fit 24/7 South Side Carl's Fine Flowers Papa Murphys Natatorium Hester's By the Bay Brinca Art Museum Other Big Bowl Korean BBQ Colier Pool Smoothie King Portland/Gregory HER Pool Flex Fit Gym Hibbett Sports Greenwood Pool Gold's Gym Gregory City Hall Joint Venture Theads 00,1 Pizza Academy Garcia Library Fuzn/s Taco Shop City Pool & Community Center La Retama Library Goodwill Portland First United Methodist Church Neyland Library Small Planet La Iguana Restaurant Harte Library RowZone Portland City Hall Hopkins Library Siagon Cafe West Side Alameda & Texan Trail Boys & Girls Club Greenwood Island yogurt Shop La Michoacana Freedom Fitness McDonald Library Marble Slab A-7 APPENDICES Flyer Sample transportation. We want to hear from you! MAP IT! TRACK IT! map where you download Strava to bike ride or where your smartphone you'd like to ride to track your routes ANSWER IT! survey to share your priorities www.coastalbendinmotion.org rww.facebook.com/coastalbendinmotion EXHIBITA Appendix G: Interview Protocol What is your primary reason for riding a bicycle? • Transportation • Recreation • Exercise • Other How often do you ride a bicycle? • Everyday • At lease once a week • 1-4timesa month • Less than a dozentimesyearly • Ido not use a bike Where do you ride your bicycle? • Streets • Destinations • On street or onsidwalk How many miles do youtypically ride to get to yourjob/destination? Why do you use a bike for transportation as opposed to a car or public transportation? What improvements do you think could be made to make your commute easier? What improvements do you think could be made to encourage more people to use bicycling as a form of transportation? How accurately does the following statement describe your vision for the future of your community? (Select one) The urban area of the Coastal Bend is aplace where walking and biking are important to the community culture and represent practical, safe travel and recreation options for residents and visitors of all levels of ability. • This statement does not describe my vision forthe future of my community at all • This statement partially describesmyvision for the future of my community • This statement accurately describes myvision for the future of my community In which zip code do you live? How old are you? Are you a full time student? Yes No Appendix G: List of Interviewees Interview 1 Gender M Age 65 Non- Student/Student N Zip 78374 Interview Gender Age Student/ Non -Student Zip 26 M 39 N 78413 2 F 65 N 78374 27 M 29 N 78413 3 F 12 S 78374 28 M 28 N 78413 4 F 45 N 78374 29 F 28 N 78413 5 F 42 N 78374 30 M 54 N 78414 6 F 65 N 78374 31 F 45 N 78414 7 F 38 N 78374 32 M 72 N 78414 8 M 12 5 78374 33 F 35 N 78414 9 F 12 S 78374 34 M 43 N 78414 10 M 10 5 78374 35 F 11 5 78414 11 F 35 N 78404 36 F 63 N 78414 12 F 46 N 78404 37 M 50 N 78414 13 M 53 N 78404 38 M 23 N 78415 14 M 14 S 78405 39 M 23 N 78415 15 M 43 N 78405 40 M 35 N 78415 16 F 56 N 78410 41 F 19 5 78416 17 F 54 N 78411 42 M 8 Y 78416 18 M 43 N 78411 43 M 14 Y 78416 19 M 63 N 78411 44 F 65 N 78418 20 F 25 S 78412 45 M 63 N 78418 21 M 16 S 78412 46 M 33 3 78418 22 M 16 S 78412 47 M 5 5 78418 23 M 17 S 78412 48 M 24 5 78418 24 F 17 S 78412 49 M 34 N 78418 25 M 22 N 78413 50 M 15 5 — EXHIBITA APPENDICES A-8 A-9 Appendix H: Targeted Vetting of Preliminary Bicycle Mobility Network Appendix 1: Sample Resolution in Support of Implementation of the Date 05/16/2015 Entity City of Portland Delegate Jamie Pyle, P.E. Title Director of Public Works City of Portland Brian DeLatte, P.E. Assistant City Manager 09/04/2015 Convention &Visitors Bureau Elvia Aguilar Director of Brand Management Downtown Management District Terry Sweeney Executive Manager SEA District Association Bill Durrill General Manager 09/17/2015 North Beach Community Association Carrie Robertson Meyer President 09/21/2015 Texas A&M University Corpus Christi Dr. Amanda Drum Executive Director, Strategic Engagement & Initiatives Regional Transportation Authority Gordon Robinson, PMP Director of Planning City of Corpus Christi Scott Harris, P.E. Chair, Transportation Advisory Commission City of Corpus Christi Gretchen Arnold Chair, Bicycle & Pedestrian Subcommittee 09/23/2015 City of Corpus Christi Tom Niskala Consultant, Capital Programs City of Corpus Christi Sara Munoz Senior Engineer, Traffic Engineering City of Corpus Christi Dr. Raymond Chong, P.E. Director of Traffic Engineering City of Corpus Christi Stacie Talbert Anaya Interim Director, Parks & Recreation City of Corpus Christi Annika G. Yankee Senior Project Manager City of Corpus Christi Mark Schauer Assistant Chief of Investigations Bureau City of Corpus Christi Ronald Zirbes Senior Officer City of Corpus Christi Jerry Shoemaker, P.E Senior Program Manager, Capital Programs City of Corpus Christi Andy Leal, P.E Assistant Director, Street Operations Invite Sent City of Corpus Christi Greg Smith Chair, Island Strategic Action Committee Invite Sent San Patricio County EDC Becky McMillon Director of finance City of Gregory Chief Robert Meager Chief of Police Invite Sent NAS/CCAD Col. Pouge Email request graphic sent APPENDICES Bicycle Mobility Plan 1. WHEREAS, That the [Adopting Body] has a vision that the community is a place where walking and biking are integral to the community culture and represent viable, safe travel and recreation options for residents and visitors of diverse abilities and 2. WHEREAS, the [Adopting Body] has a goal of improving the health of its residents and the air quality of the community; 3. WHEREAS, both obesity and insufficient physical activity are creating significant health problems for Americans, leading to increased risk of heart disease, diabetes, endometrial, breast, and colon cancers, high blood pressure, high ch9lesterol, stroke, liver and gallbladder disease, sleep apnea, respiratory problems, and osteoarthritis; 4. WHEREAS, a primary contributor to obesity is lack of sufficient physical activity; 2 5. WHEREAS, bicycling is a safe, low -impact aerobic activity, enjoyed by millions of Americans, and provides a convenient opportunity to obtain physical exercise while traveling to work, shops, restaurants, and manyother common destinations;3 6. WHEREAS, bicycling frequently provides a practical alternative to driving, since 28 percent of all car trips are to destinations within one mile of home440percent of all trips are two miles or less from home and around 30percent of commuters travelfive miles or less to wok 7. WHEREAS, bicycling can greatly increase access to important services and provide more range of travel for people who do not own or cannot operate a car, including our increasing aging population, children and youth, people who are low-income, and those with disabilities or medical restrictions on drivingdue to issues like seizure disorders or vision impairments; 7 8. WHEREAS, replacing car trips with bicycle trips improves air quality by reducing the amount of carbon dioxide emissions, in light of the fact that transportation sources account for nearly one third of all such emissions in the United States, an average motor vehicle emp 8.8 kilograms of carbon dioxide per gallon of gasoline that it burns, and biking emitsessentially none; 9. WHEREAS, asthma rates are at their highest levels ever, with nearly one in lOchildren and almost one in 12 Americans of all ages suffering from asthma, and replacing motor vehicle trips with bicycle trips reduces the pollutants that directly contribute to asthma in both children and adults;9 10. WHEREAS, replacing car trips with bicycle trips reduces congestion and wear and tear on roads, improvingquality of life forresidents and providing afi nancial benefit for [Jurisdiction]; 11. WHEREAS, providing safe, convenient, and adequate bicycle parking is necessary to encourage increased use of bicycles as a form of transportation; 10 EXHIBITA Appendix I: Sample Resolution (con't) 12. WHEREAS, cities that have improved bicycle infrastructure, including parking, have seen a measurable increase in bicycle trips;11 13. WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing, [Adopting Body] desires to adopt and implement the Strategic Plan for Active Mobility to (1) develop of a cohesive, strategic network of bicycle facilities that accommodates a diversity of riders (2) enhance bicycle mode share for trips of all types (3) promote health and wellness through bicycling, and (4) enhance safety forbicyclists. SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas supports the implementation of the Corpus Christi's Metropolitan Planning Organization's Strategic Plan forActive Mobility. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE [ADOPTING BODY]: Attest: City of Corpus Christi Rebecca Huerta, City Secretary Nelda Martinez, Mayor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Overweight and Obesity: Health Consequences. Atlanta: CDC, 2012. Available ah www-cdc.gov/obesity/causes/health.html. 'Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Overweight and Obesity: Causes and Consequences. Atlanta: CDC, 2012. Available at: www.cdc.gov/obesity/causes/index.html. 'See Active Living Research, Active Transportation:: Making the Link from Transportation to Physical Activity and Obesity, Research Brief. 2009. Available at: www.activelivi ngresea rch.org/files/ALR_Brief_Act IveTra nspo rtatio n.pdf. ^See America Bikes, League of American Bicyclists. Factsheet National Household Travel Survey. Available at. www.bikeleague.org/resources/reports/pdfs/ntits09,pdh see also T. Litman. "Short and Sweet Analysis of Shorter Trips Using Notional Personal Travel Survey Data."Victoria Transport Policy Institute (February 22, 2012 ) at 3. (41%of all trips are 3 miles or less (and 67% of those are by car), and 19% of all trips are 1 mile or less (and 42% of those are by car)). Available at: tvvvw.vtpi.org/short_sweet.pdf. See America Bikes, League of American Bicyclists. Foctsheet: Notional Household Travel Survey. Available at: w.bikeleague.org/resources/reports/pots/nhts09.pdf: see also Rails -to -Trails Conservancy. Turning Potential into Practice: Walking and Biking as Mainstream Transportation Choices 2007. Available at: wwwrtailstotrails.org/resources/documents/whatwedo/Trailtink%2007%20Program_Mobility.pdf (citing FHWA 2006). Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics. 'Figure 2 Ona typical day, how many miles one-way do you travel from home to work?" Omnismis, 3(4): 2003. Available at: www.bts.gov/publications/omnistats/volume_03_is e_04/html/figure_02.html- US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation, Lesson B: Pedestrian Characteristics. July 2006, p. 1-10. Available at: www.fhwa.dotgov/publications/research/safety/pedbike/05085/pdf/Iesson8lo.pdf; Office of the Prime Minister, Social Exclusion Unit. Making the Connections: Final Report on Transport and Social Exclusion. Feb. 2003, p. 1-7. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov. uk/+/http:/fwww.ca binetoffice.gov.uk/media/cabinetoffice/social_exdu cion_task_farce/assets/publlcations_1997_ to_2006/making_transport_2003.pdf. s U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. The 'Carbon Footprint' of Doily Travel: NHTS Brief 2009. Available at http://nhts.ornl.gov/briefs/Carbon%20Footprint%20of%2OTravel.pdf. °5ee, e.g., C. Paige. "Pediatric Asthma Linked to Car Emissions."Boston Globe, March 2, 2008. Available at: www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2009/03/02/pedietric_asthma_linked_to_car_emissions/r Environmental Working Group's Auto Asthma Index (and sources cited therein). Available at: www.ewg.org/sites/asthrnaindex/about/; R. Rabin. "Asthma Rate Rises Sharply in U.S., Government Says." New iO See, e.g., Vanderbilt T. "What Would Get Americans Biking to Work? Decent Parking." Slate, Aug. 17, 2009. Available at. www.slate.com/id/2225511/; see also, e.g., City of New York Department of City Planning, Transportation Division. The New York City Bicycle Survey: A Report Based on the Online Public Opinion Questionnaire Conducted for Bike Month 2006. 2007. Available at: www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/pdf/transportation/bike_survey.pdf at p.15 (NYC commuters report a lack of safe storage for bicycles as a leading reason for not commuting by bike). "See, e.g., Marin County Bicycle Coalition0conomic Benefits of Bicycling in Urban Environments . Available at: www.marinbike.org/Resources/EconornicBenefitsOfBicycling.pdf (citing a 1184-125% increase in bicycle use in Marin County over the last ten years due to improvements in infrastructure, including pathways, shared use intersection improvements and bicycle parking; and pointing to increased revenue due to retail purchases by bicyclists with adequate access to Infrastructure and parkings ee Ghat Dill and T. Carr. "If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them -Another Look."Transportation Research Board 2003 Annual Meeting (cities with higher levels of bicycle infrastructure (bike lanes and paths) witnessed higher levels of bicycle commuting). Available at. www,palgrave-Journals.cam/jphp/journal/v30/nS1/full/jphp200856a.html- EXHIBITA APPENDICES A-10 Appendix J: Drive Kind Ride Kind Program Guide Drive Kind • Plea. BE KIND to Cyclists is pleased to add to your in.ructional s toolbox, an edu.tional video promoting safety for both motorists and cyclists. This video, titled DriveKind RidelGnd, was jointly developed by Please BE KIND to Cyclists and the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) 09 promo..fe driving practices by motorists as they share Texas roads with vulnerable road users such as cyclists and pedestrians. Please BE KIND to Cyclists developed the DriveKind RideKind video undone TxDOT grant, specifically for: driver education instruction and schools, defensive driving classes, commercial driving schools, law enforcement academies in Texas, . well as the general public. The DriveKind RideKind video is correlated to the Texas Education Agency's (TEA) Program of Organized Instruction for Driver Education and Traffic Safety. Instructors, school owners, administrators and the general public are welcome and encouraged to view, download and share the DriveKind RideKind video at no cost at DriveKindRideKind.org. A-11 APPENDICES Curriculum - Program Guide Section 1: A True Smry Section 3: Awareness Section 5 Mean.. Section 4: D./W{16MS Section 5. Crashes Section 6: Sharing the Road .cdon 7 Personal Rest:mm..11w TEA Program of Organized Instruction (P01) for Driver Education and Traffic Safety POI 11 introduction (legal a. responsible reduce.. driving practices) POI I 13: RightroTWay POI 11S: Controlling Traffic Flow P011 I T Coopereting with Other Road., Users POI s 11: Visual Common, Mental Attention a. Communication POI 41.1: Sinving Practices F'01 4 I 2 Fatigue Poi 4 I S Aggress. Driving POI 511i Risk Factors POI 5177 Space Management FOI 61.1 Enwromrsintal Charactermics P0,11: Distrecoons POI 7.33: Multidask Performances P019 1.1: Adverse Weather.. Reduced Visibility Conditions POI 12.1: Personal Responsibility EXHIBIT A Resources Please BE KIND. Cyclists www.facero'de.aMVecfe'fittaCyclists Texas Departmare of Trantatetation, Driver li.ources www.txdotsgovidriver html Texas Trenspor.tion Code, Tale 7. Vehicles & Traffic. Sec. 551,.Operation of Bicycles.... www.statutes.legis.state.W.us/doimIto/htmitn.551.htm National Highway Traffiy,z,vSann71,0dVtattan, Bicycle Resourc. Texas Depeenent MINIS(.1,111:6111, iticycle Resources www.dotgoy/driver/shatecoad/bicycles.html 9"7,ZtZ:17,tt5*:0'1' Texas Education Agegcy's Etaatiorgavvice Caster, Region XIII, Texas Edua.an Agency', Program of Organised Instruction for Privet Education and Traffic Sadaty - November 2009 www4.e.13.net/uploads/driversidocsfinstructionaloblectiyes_tpctf Texas Commission an Law Enforcement Academy Training Providers www tole°. stateutx uskonte./training_protiders_acadernme. Texas Department ad Motor Weald. Commercial Driver Belue.on www.dmv.orgAmtexas/cdiredocation.pdy 1""°,7,:,177ItZt.'`..7,711t0,c7.`700"' feee Official US Goeerren&assty.Vetibeitn rvis Distracted Driving Smart Growth Artiori.. °angora. by Design 2010 www.smartgrowthemerico.org/research/dangerous-byrdesign/dbd2010/ regional -date/ Appendix J: Drive Kind Ride Kind Program Guide (con't) Nal NMI 7n 17 Driveland Ride Kind oBE KIND Cyclists* Please BE KIND . CyclEta members wag a/rchmdma, motonma, Bohm malmm.aro LIII Save a Life - Texas Department„rTmnwarNmr LaTL`OiTreific Oporarnis Drubs aw�,i xa For more information contact: oryProg.am Dnv rind MalaMod Program Blamgar Manager/ CTCM/Paralegal Please BE CND to Cyclists TxDOT Traffic Operations Division, 805 W. 10111 Street Traffic Safety Section Suite 300 125 East 11th StreetAu stin, texas 78701 Austin, Texas 78704 512-7168955 51241,13293 DriveKindRideKind.org Appendix K: Model Bicycle Parking Ordinance Developed by ChangeLab Solution Edited for use by Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I. "BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT AND MAJOR RENOVATIONS.” § 1. PURPOSE § 2. DEFINITIONS § 3. BICYCLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED § 4. BUILDING PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY § 5. EXISTING BICYCLE PARKING AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION § 6. BICYCLE PARKING STANDARDS — GENERAL § 7. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO SHORT-TERM BICYCLE PARKING ONLY § 8. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO LONG-TERM BICYCLE PARKING ONLY § 9. MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING SPACE CREDITS § 10. (optional) MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENTS SECTION II. "BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR PARKING FACILITIES." § 1. PURPOSE: § 2. DEFINITIONS: § 3. LICENSING CONDITIONS § 4. LOCATION: § 5. BIKE RACKS: § 6. SIGNAGE § 7. CONTRACTUAL LIMITS ON LIABILITY SECTION III. "BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIAL EVENTS INVOLVING STREET CLOSURES." § 1. PURPOSE § 2. CONDITIONS ON STREET CLOSURE PERMITS § 3. REQUIREMENTS FOR MONITORED PARKING § 4. LOCATION § 5. PUBLICITY AND SIGNAGE § 6. INSURANCE COVERAGE AND FEES: SECTION IV ''REMOVAL OF ABANDONED BICYCLES." § 1. PURPOSE § 2. DEFINITIONS § 3. REMOVAL REQUIREMENTS SECTION V.r'IMPLEMENTATION OF ORDINANCE." § 1. REGULATIONS AND PROCEDURES § 2. TRAINING § 3. REPORTING SECTION VI.STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION SECTION VII. EFFECTIVE DATE EXHIBITA APPENDICES A-12 Appendix K: Model Bicycle Parking Ordinance (con't) An Ordinance of [Jurisdiction (e.g. the City of )] Providingfor Bicycle Parking and Adding to the [Jurisdiction] [Zoning/Planning/Municipal/County] Code. SECTION I. [ARTICLE/CHAPTER] OF THE [JURISDICTION] [ZONING/PLANNING/MUNICIPAL/COUNTY CODE] IS HEREBY ADDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: "BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT AND MAJOR RENOVATIONS." § 1. PURPOSE: The purpose of this section is to provide sufficient safe and convenient bicycle parking in New Developments and Major Renovations to encourage bicycling as form of transportation, reducing traffic congestion, air pollution, wear and tear on roads, and use of fossil fuels, while fostering healthy physical activity. 4 2. DEFINITIONS: Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the following terms shall have the following meanings: (A) "Bicycle Parking Space": A physical space that is a minimum of [2.5] feet in width by [6] feet in length with a vertical clearance of at least [7] feetthat allows for the parking of one bicycle, and if located outside, is hard surfaced and well drained. (B) "Bike Locker: A lockable enclosure consistent with industry standards that (i) can hold one bicycle, (6) is made of durable material, (iii) is designed to fully protect the bicycle against [insert specific local weather concerns, e.g.: rain, snow, ice, high winds], (iv) provides secure protection from theft, (v) opens sufficie ntly to allow bicyclists easy access, and (vi) is of a character and color that adds aesthetically to the immediate environment. (C) "Bike Rack: A device consistent with industry standards that (i) is capable of supporting a bicycle in a stable position, (ii) is made of durable materials, (iii) is no less than [36] inches tall (from base to top of rack) and no less than [1.5] feet in length, (iv) permits the securing of the bicycle frame and one wheel with a U-shaped lock, and (v) is of a character and color that adds aesthetically to the immediate environment. (D) "In -Street Bicycle Parking": A portion of a vehicle parking lane or other area on a roadway that is set aside for the parkingof bicycles. (1) "Long -Term Bicycle Parking": Bicycle parking that is primarily intended for bicyclists who need bicycle parkingformore than 3 hours and is fully protected from the weather. (F) "Long -Term Bicycle Parking Space": A Bicycle Parking Space that provides Long -Term Bicycle Parking. A-13 APPENDICES (G) "Major Renovation": Any physical improvement of an existing building or structure, excluding single-family dwellings and multi -family dwellings with 4 or fewer units, that requires a building permit and has an estimated construction cost equal to or exceeding [$250,000], excluding cost of (1) compliance with accessibility requirements for individuals with disabilities under governing federal, state, or local law,and (2) seismic or other structural safety retrofit. (H) "New Development": Any construction of a new building or facility that requires a building permit, excluding single-family dwellings and multi -family dwellingswith 4 or less units. (I) "Short -Term Bicycle Parking": Bicycle parking primarily intended for bicyclists who need bicycle parkingfor 3 hours or less. (1) "Short -Term Bicycle Parking Space": A Bicycle Parking Space that provides Short -Term Bicycle Parking. § 3. BICYCLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: Short -Term and Long -Term Bicycle Parking Spaces shall be required for all New Development and Major Renovations. (A) Required Number of Bicycle Parking Spaces: All New Development and Major Renovations shall provide atleast the number of Short -Tenn and Long -Term Bicycle Parking Spaces identified in the table in this subsection [Section II, § 3(A)]; however, the number shall not fall below a minimum of [2] Short -Term and [2] Long -Term Bicycle Parking Spaces, regardless of other provisions herein, except that multi -family dwellings that have private garages (or equivalent separate storage space for each unit) are not required to provide any Long -Term Bicycle Parking Spaces. Where the calculation of total required spaces results in a fractional number, the next highest whole number shall be used. Up to half of the required Short -Term Bicycle Parking Spaces may be replaced with Long -Term Bicycle Parking Spaces. General Use Category Specific Use Number of Short -Term Bicycle Number of Long -Term Bicycle Parking Spaces Required Parking Spaces Required Residential Multifamily Dwelling with more than 4 units: (a) without private garage or equivalent separate storage space for each unit (b) with private garage or equivalent separate storage space for each unit EXHIBITA [.05] per bedroom Or [1] per [20] units or [.05] per bedroom or [1] per [20] units [.05] per bedroom or [1-4] per [4] units None Appendix K: Model Bicycle Parking Ordinance (con't) General Use Category Cate Specific Use Number of Short -Term Bicycle Parking Spaces Required Number of Long -Term Bicycle Parking Spaces Required Commercial Office Building General Retail Grocery Restaurant Parking Garage Outdoor Parking Lot [1] per each [20,000] sq.ft. of floor area [1] per each [5,000] sq.ft. of floor area [1] per each [2,000] sq.ft. of floor area [1] per each [2,000] sq.ft. of floor area [2] spaces [1] per [20] motor vehicle spaces [1-1.51 per [10,000] sq.ft. of floor area [1] per [10,000112,0001 sq.ft. of floor area [1] per [10,000-12,000] sq.ft. of floor area [1] per [10,00612,000] sq.ft. of floor area [1] per [20] motor vehicle spaces [2] spaces Civic Non -assembly cultural (e.g., library, government buildings) Assembly (e.g., church, theater, stadiums, parks) Schools (0-12) Collegesand Universities [1] per each [8,000-10,000] sq. ft. of floor area Spaces for [2-5] per cent of maximum expected daily attendance [1] per each [20] students of planned capacity [1] per each [20] students of planned capacity [1-1.5] per each [10-20] employees [1- 1.5] per each [20] employees [1] per each [10-20] employees and [1] per each [20] students of planned capacity for grades 6-12 [1] per each [10-20] employees and [1] per each [10] students of planned capacity or [1] per each [20,000] sq. feet of floor area, whichever is greater Industrial Manufactudng and Production, Agriculture [2] spaces (Can be increased at discretion of Planning/Zoning Administrator) [1] per [20] employees (B) If the New Development or Major Renovation is for a use not listed in the above table, the number of Bicycle Parking Spaces required shall be calculated on the basis of a similar use, as determined bythe [Planning Director/Zoning Administrator]. (C) If the Major Renovation has an estimated construction cost of between [$250,000] and [$1,000,000], excluding the cost of (1) compliance with accessibility requirements for individuals with disabilities under governing federal, state, or local law, and (2) seismic or other structural safety retrofit, the number of Bicycle Parking Spaces required by subsections [Section II, § (3)(A) - (B)], shall be reduced by 50 percent; however, the minimum requirement of [2] short-term and [2] long-term bicycle parking spaces shall still apply. § 4. BUILDING PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: Prior to issuance of a building permit for New Development or a Major Renovation, the submitted plans must include specific provisions for bicycle parkingthat are consistent with the requirements of this Ordinance. No certificate of occupancy for said building permit shall issue at the conclusion of the project until [Jurisdiction] finds that the applicable provisions of this Ordinance have been complied with. § 5. EXISTING BICYCLE PARKING AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION: In the event that the [Jurisdiction] has authorized a permit holder to remove existing bicycle parking in the public right-of-way due to construction, the permit holder shall replace such bicycle parking no later than the date of completion of the construction. At least [7] days prior to removal of such bicycle parking, the permit holder shall post, in the immediate vicinity of the bicycle parking area, a weather-proof notice, with a minimum type size of [1] inch, specifying the date of removal. In the event that any bicycles remain parked on the date of the removal, such bicycles shall be stored for a reasonable period, not less than [45] days, and a conspicuous, weather-proof notice shall be placed as close as feasible to the site of the removed bicycle parking containing information as to howto retrieve a removed bicycle. If bicycle parkingis likely to be removed, pursuantto this section, formore than [120] days, it shall, to the extent possible, be temporarily re-sited, in coordination with [insert appropriate department, such as Department of Public Works], to a location as close to the original site as feasible, pending completion of the construction. If the temporary site is not clearly visible from the original site, the permit holder shall post a conspicuous, weather-proof notice in the immediate vicinity of the original site informing bicyclists of the location of the temporary site. § 6. BICYCLE PARKING STANDARDS- GENERAL: (A) All Bicycle Parking Spaces shall be: (1) well lit if accessible to the public or bicyclists after dark; (2) located to ensure significant visibility by the public and building users, exceptin the case of Long -Term Bicycle Parking that is located in secured areas; (3) accessible without climbing more than one step or going up or down a slope in excess of [12] percent, and via a route on the property that is designed to minimize conflicts with motor vehicles and pedestrians. (5) All In -Street Bicycle Parking and Bicycle Parking Spaces located in a parkingfacility shall be: (1) clearly marked; and (2) separated from motor vehicles by some form of physical barrier (such as bollards, concrete or rubber curbing or pads, reflective wands, a wall, or a combination thereof) designed to adequately protectthe safety of bicyclists and bicycles. EXHIBITA APPENDICES A-14 Appendix K: Model Bicycle Parking Ordinance (con't) (C) All Bike Racks shall be located at least [36] inches in all directions from any obstruction, including but not limited to other Bike Racks, walls, doors, posts, columns, or exterior or interior landscaping. (D) Unless Bicycle Parking Spaces are clearly visible from an entrance, a sign indicating their location shall be prominently displayed outside the main entrance to the building or facility, and additional signs shall be provided as necessary to ensure easy way finding. A "Bicycle Parking" sign shall also be displayed on or adjacent to any indoor room or area designated for bicycle parking. All outdoor signs required by this subsection [Section II, § 6(D)] shall be no smaller than [12] x [18] inches and utilize a type size of at least [2] inches. All indoor signs required by this subsection [Section II,§ 6(D)] shall be no smaller than [8] x [10] inches and utilize atype size of at least [5/8] inch. § 7. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO SHORT-TERM BICYCLE PARKING ONLY: All Short -Term Bicycle Parking Spaces shall contain Bike Racks and shall meet the following requirements, in addition to the requirements in [Section II, § 3] above: (A) Location: (1) Short -Term Bicycle Parking must be located either (a) within [50] feet of the main public entrance of the building or facility, or (b) no further than the nearest motor vehicle parking space to the main public entrance (excluding parking for individuals with disabilities), whichever is closer. If the New Development or Major Renovation contains multiple buildings or facilities, the required Short -Term Bicycle Parking shall be distributed to maximize convenience and use. (2) Short -Term Bicycle Parking Spaces may be located either (a) on-site or (b) in the public right-of-way (e.g., sidewalk or In -Street Bicycle Parking), provided that an encroachment permit is obtained for the installation and the installation meets all other requirements of [indicate the law governing encroachments on public rights-of-way]. If Bike Racks are located on public sidewalks, they must provide at least [5] feet of pedestrian clearance, and up to [6] feet where available, and be at least [2] feetfrom the curb. (B) Bike Rack Requirements: Bike Racks used for Short -Term Bicycle Parking must be securely attached to concrete footings, a concrete sidewalk, or another comparably secure concrete surface, and made to withstand severe weather and permanent exposure to the elements. A-15 APPENDICES § 8. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO LONG-TERM BICYCLE PARKING ONLY: Long - Term Bicycle Parking shall be provided in either (1) Bike Lockers or (2) indoor rooms or areas specifically designated for bicycle parking (including designated areas of an indoorparkingfacility), and shall satisfy the following requirements, in addition to those setforth in [Section II, § 3] above: (A) Location: Long -Term Bicycle Parking may be located either on- or off-site. If located off-site, it shall be no more than [300 feet] from the main public entrance. (B) Requirements for Indoor Long -Term Bicycle Parking: Long -Term Bicycle Parking located in designated indoor rooms or areas shall contain Bike Racks or comparable devices. Such rooms shall be designed to maximize visibility of all portions of the room or designated area from the entrance. Supplemental security measures (such as limiting access to a designated indoor bike parking room to personswith a key, smart card, or code) are optional. §9. MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING SPACE CREDITS: (A) For every [6] Bicycle Parking Spaces provided, the number of required off-street motor vehicle parking spaces (excluding parking spaces for individuals with disabilities) on a site shall be reduced by [1] space. (B) To encourage the installation of showers at non-residential sites, the number of required off- street motor vehicle parking spaces for such sites shall be reduced as follows: A credit of [1] space shall be provided for the first shower installed, with additional off-street motor vehicle parking credits available at a rate of [1] space for each additional shower provided per [25] required Bicycle Parking Spaces. In order to claim these credits, which shall be in addition to the bicycle parking credits provided for in [Section II, § 9(A)], shower facilities must be readily available for use by all employees of the New Developmentor Major Renovation. § 10. (optional) MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENTS: In the event that satisfying all of the requirements of [Section II] would be (a) infeasible due to the unique nature of the site, or (b) cause an unintended consequence that undermines the purpose of this Ordinance, a property owner (or designee) may submit a written request to the [Planning Director/Zoning Administrator/other Local Administrator or designee] for a modification of the requirements of [Section II]. The request shall state the specific reason(s) for the request, provide supporting documentation, and propose an alternative action thatwill allow the purposes of this Ordinance to be fulfilled as much as possible. SECTION II [ARTICLE/CHAPTER] OF THE [JURISDICTION] [ZONING/PLANNING/MUNICIPAL/COUNTY CODE] IS HEREBY ADDED TO READ "BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR PARKING FACILITIES." § 1. PURPOSE: The purpose of [Section III] is to provide sufficient safe and convenient bicycle parking in parking facilities so as to encourage bicycling as a form of transportation, which in turn reduces traffic EXHIBITA Appendix K: Model Bicycle Parking Ordinance (con't) congestion, air pollution, wear and tear on roads, and use of fossil fuels, while fostering healthy physical activity. § 2. DEFINITIONS: The definitions set forth in [Section II, § 2] shall apply to [Section III], unless the contextclearly requires otherwise. § 3. LICENSING CONDITIONS: As a condition of the issuance or renewal of a license required by the [Jurisdiction] fora parking facility, parking facilities shall provide [1] Bicycle Parking Space per each [20] vehicle parkingspaces provided, with a minimum of [6] Bicycle Parking Spaces. Where the calculation of total required spaces results in a fractional number, the next highestwhole number shall be used. §4. LOCATION: All Bicycle Parking Spaces required by [Section III] shall be located in an area, preferably on the ground floor, that (i) can be conveniently and safely accessed by bicycle and by foot in a way that minimizes conflicts with motor vehicles, (ii) is not isolated, and (iii) maximizes visibility by parkingfacility patrons and attendants. If the licensed parking facility has multiple entrances, the required Bicycle Parking Spaces may be spread out among the multiple entrances. Bicycle Parking Spaces shall be accessible withoutclimbingmore than one step or going up or down a slope in excess of [12] percent. § 5. BIKE RACKS: All Bicycle Parking Spaces required by [Section III] shall contain Bike Racks and shall be well lit if accessible to the public or bicyclists after dark or if in an interior or darkened location. All Bike Racks shall also provide a clearance of at least [36] inches in all directions from any obstruction (including but not limited to other bike racks, walls, doors, posts, columns or landscaping), and shall be separated from vehicles by some form of physical barrier (such as bollards, concrete or rubber curbing or pads, reflective wands, a wall, or a combination thereof) designed to adequately protect the safety of bicyclists and bicycles. All Bike Racks located outdoors shall also be securely attached to concrete footings and made to withstand severe weather and permanent exposure to the elements. § 6. SIGNAGE: Parking facilities shall also install prominent signs, no smaller than [12] x [18] inches and utilizinga type size of at least [2] inches, in or near each entrance that advertise the availability of bicycle parking, and the location, if itis not visible from the entrance. § 7. CONTRACTUAL LIMITS ON LIABILITY: [Section III] shall not interfere with the rights of a parking facility owner (or designee) to enter into agreements with facility users or take other lawful measures to limitthe parkingfacility's liability to users, including bicycle users, with respect to parking in the parking facility, provided that such agreements or measures are otherwise in accordance with the requirements of [this Ordinance] and the law. SECTION III. [ARTICLE/CHAPTER] OF THE [JURISDICTION] [ZONING/PLANNING/MUNICIPAL/COUNTY CODE] IS HEREBY ADDED TO READ "BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIAL EVENTS INVOLVING STREET CLOSURES." § 1. PURPOSE: The purpose of [Section IV] is to provide sufficient safe and convenient bicycle parking at special events involving street closures to encourage bicycling as a form of transportation, which in turn reduces traffic congestion, air pollution, wear and tear on roads, and use of fossil fuels, while fostering healthy physical activity. § 2. CONDITIONS ON STREET CLOSURE PERMITS: As a condition ofa permitfor the closure ofa street for a special event in which the daily number of participants is projected to be [1,000] or more, monitored bicycle parking shall be provided by the event sponsor (or a designee) for at least [1] % of expected daily participants beginning [34 hour] before and ending [Yz hour] after the time of the event each day of the event. § 3. REQUIREMENTS FOR MONITORED PARKING: Monitored bicycle parking shall include the presence, at all times, of one attendant, or more as needed, to receive bicycles, dispense claim checks, return bicycles, and provide securityfor all bicycles. § 4. LOCATION: All monitored bicycle parking shall be located within [500] feet of at least one regular entrance or accesspointto the event. § 5. PUBLICITY AND SIGNAGE: All publicity, including signs, for the event shall state the availability of monitored bicycle parking, its location, and cost, if any. All event maps shall include the location of monitored bicycle parking. If monitored bicycle parking is not within eyeshot of each entrance, signs shall be provided to ensure easywayfinding. § 6. INSURANCE COVERAGE AND FEES: The event sponsor or designee must provide insurance coverage for the monitored bicycle parking in case of damaged or stolen bicycles, and may charge users a fee to coverthe cost of providingthe monitored parking. SECTION IV. [ARTICLE/CHAPTER] OF THE [ZONING/PLANNING/MUNICIPAL/COUNTY CODE] IS HEREBY ADDED TO READ "REMOVAL OF ABANDONED BICYCLES." § 1. PURPOSE: The purpose of [Section V] is to ensure the reasonably prompt removal of bicycles abandoned in Bicycle Parking Spaces so as to encourage bicycling as a form of transportation, which in turn reduces traffic congestion, air pollution, wear and tear on roads, and use of fossil fuels, while fosteringhealthy physical activity. EXHIBITA APPENDICES A-16 Appendix K: Model Bicycle Parking Ordinance (con't) § 2. DEFINITIONS: The definitions set forth in [Section II, § 2] of this Ordinance shall apply to [Section V], unless the contextclearly requiresotherwise. § 3. REMOVAL REQUIREMENTS: On [a quarterly basis], owners of property (ora designee) subject to [Sections II or III of this Ordinance] shall remove, from all Bicycle Parking Spaces associated with their property, including those located on the public right-of-way, bicycles that have been abandoned. A bicycle shall be deemed to be abandoned if it has not been removed after having been tagged with a notice of removal for [2] weeks for Short -Tenn Bicycle Parking Spaces or [4] weeks for Long -Term Bicycle Parking Spaces. However, a bicycle shall not be deemed to be abandoned if the bicyclist and property owner (or designee) have a written agreement regarding provision of long term storage covering the time period in question. Abandoned bicycles may be donated to non -profits that reuse bicycles or may be disposed of in any lawful manner. SECTION V. [ARTICLE/CHAPTER] OF THE [JURISDICTION] [ZONING/PLANNING/MUNICIPAL/COUNTY CODE] IS HEREBY ADDED TO READ "IMPLEMENTATION OF ORDINANCE." § 1. REGULATIONS AND PROCEDURES: The [Planning Director/Zoning Administrator and/or other relevant local administrator(s)] [is/are] authorized to promulgate new and amend existing rules, regulations, procedures or forms as necessary or appropriate to implement the provisions of [this Ordinance]. § 2. TRAINING: [Jurisdiction] shall periodically make trainings or training materials available to planners and other employees involved in the implementation and enforcementof [this Ordinance]. § 3. REPORTING: The [Planning Director/Zoning Administrator] shall provide an annual report to the [Adopting Body] regarding the implementation of this Ordinance that shall, at a minimum, include the following information relevant to the preceding year: (1) the number of Short and Long -Term Bicycle Parking Spaces created pursuant to [Sections II and III], and the number of events for which special event bicycle parking was provided under [Section IV] ; (2) (if applicable) a brief summary of each request for modification received and action taken in response thereto; and (3) any other information learned that would improve future implementation of [this Ordinance] and itsgoals. SECTION VI. STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION: (A) All ordinances or parts thereof that conflict or are inconsistent with this Ordinance are repealed to the extent necessaryto give this Ordinance full force and effect. (B) If any section or portion of this Ordinance is judicially invalidated for any reason, that portion shall be deemed a separate and independent provision, and such ruling shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. A-1 7 APPENDICES SECTION VII. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be effective [upon passage (insert other date if desired)] ("Effective Date"), exceptthat: (A) [Section II, § 3] ("Bicycle Parking Spaces Required"), and [Section II, § 4] ("Building Permits and Certificates of Occupancy") shall only apply to New Development and Major Renovations for which a building permit is issued on or after [120] days from the Effective Date. (B) [Section III] ("Bicycle Parking Requirements for Parking Facilities") shall apply to Parking Facilities that were licensed prior to the Effective Date, and have less than [180] days remaining on their license, as follows: [1/2] of the required number of Bicycle Parking Spaces shall be provided no laterthan [120] daysfrom the expiration of the parkingfacility's license, with full implementation required no laterthan [180] days from the expiration of the parkingfacility's license. (C) [Section IV] ("Bicycle Parking Requirements for Special Events Involving Street Closures") shall not apply to events for which the temporary street closure was authorized pursuant to an application submitted priorto the Effective Date. EXHIBITA 2;m 19m _ Z.x:44:p TX -44-W Petronila T-%-44•W-1-k-44-E Corpus Christi Irit Airport Cabaniss Field Nas A 4 SR-8�f SR 9; .*'L SR -10 • \3.Sq `'SR; fls9-� SR -1 leostrosS Carr. 0o, • ry It —13 Christ Naval SR—� .�':_ ' —15 AN Station t♦♦S R-16 EXHIBITA KEY MAP Appendix L: Priority Sport Routes for Road Bikes Routes Central City Loop Lamar Park Group Guide North Side Circuit Oso Bay Loop NORTH A-18 Appendix L: Priority Sport Routes for Road Bikes A-19 Routes Central City Loop A Lamar Park Group Guide North Side Circuit Oso Bay Loop NORTH Rber Hills Country Club 27 rr. Hazel Ba.zemore Park Na(tnymur -BP e/ Pary, „ ./' SRs4 • Aker.' 'is' Pr 26 re c3 ether' Gr/ urseesey iks‘ Graeae Le • 16. ....... . • • .... , • • • ,23. • • SR -2 0:0o15 Catlett), Estate Park / 43 23 m. EXHIBIT A SR -2 Appendix L: Priority Sport Routes for Road Bikes Routes Central City Loop _NM Lamar Park Group Guide North Side Circuit Oso Bay Loop NORTH A-20 SR -3 Appendix L: Priority Sport Routes for Road Bikes A-21 Routes Central City Loop Lamar Park Group Guide North Side Circuit Oso Bay Loop NORTH 3 .1 rti SR3 11 Hark Cemetery Jackie Eden kiry Field 6� 4' V f5 sf Q� lv;cKrnp;e a :�rxkuo _ _ _ - _—NUECES -— 1}earns Fen EX 11 13117 A ,==Moble r1. EXHIBIT A SR -4 Appendix L: Priority Sport Routes for Road Bikes Routes Central City Loop _NM Lamar Park Group Guide North Side Circuit Oso Bay Loop NORTH A-22 SR -5 Appendix L: Priority Sport Routes for Road Bikes A-23 Routes Central City Loop Lamar Park Group Guide North Side Circuit Oso Bay Loop NORTH Koch efinery N 3m • rr' Tule Luke Clruurr�l L. -ter_ ,' �D / '4 C EXHIBITA —I=SK Iine Dr— = 37.5 kylark Dr ./ Horizop:Dr- \`' Z 1— — m C — Hampshir:Rd-- C' Bd-S, _ [ HalliSll 'Bon ih I -37 -SI s kylark Or— =Hampshire Rd Hall SI 3;p1' rt. .3 a Joe-FultortIntl-Trade = 7 Ac tl ILill Ave - SR -6 Leopard $t EXHIBITA .•-":"0. • Oak park H t'c by „S Bo.,io s.. Hdl Cross Cemetery Rae Hill Appendix L: Priority Sport Routes for Road Bikes Routes Central City Loop Lamar Park Group Guide North Side Circuit Oso Bay Loop NORTH A-24 SR -7 Appendix L: Priority Sport Routes for Road Bikes A-25 Routes Central City Loop Lamar Park Group Guide North Side Circuit Oso Bay Loop NORTH Industrial Canal _E-N.wlgation Blvd .O •N Het Crass i enetery Rme Hill Cemetery F,lard iib ...Srr La1>ard St Mdrpe 6. u pan SI klareor Dr Ghataburger Field • • .1. hleutnm St V,mlInward SI 7 iki Lal; .Jo 5 Ben Park ,ake St I 37 5.1 Corpus Christi 12m SR-7 1.0n1111:hc St B lucheF 0 316 /H 361 RowNE Gough Blurt Park :a:6 A,,, _ €i • • • • • • • • rpus • Christi • • • Iklanna Ruin v r. ,,,Iggln. Palk SR -8 EXHIBITA 77.2- Latnac St Ago, St Ma[gonnie 4;'.' • • PY SCAM , Blaal ,• A Park Roll, St l; MOr Waggin, Park Christus Spohn Hoppital-Mensarial I,,paal St - - Annta Sr aj. 54 (;• 5 5 - Pad, 55 100. ;•, Temple Parh MD, car? 4,6 C' 1'• • f„, Het. Park 30,4, 43,5 43 .43 *•°. •• s, 1,5350'' " aVal, -• • t ••* Cole Park a.•'' • •,.4mptothealef •-• • 4,, • • ••••• • sg , 4 • ...... -. .. -.1 ,_, ..• .. „, • • ,„, 4 •• • „., •• ... . .,, . ' /3 A? ,..,0 „c` ,.3 35 '"‘ • .,4.,"` , •-- . . 5,,,,,,e .• • . , ,.., .„4- • ,,,, • • -• . e . ,a,,, - 55 % / S''' -\''' **•''. .. -. ,>- e AsP •. . % . vs' %•.> .... ,.-.' . ,-,,, . .. , ••.•• ., , ,,, 4, ,,,4 ,,....f'"''' ....- 4 •• ,ae o' -'s ••• <a',-..''' 4.a..:' • • SR -9 EXHIBIT A **. • • • *41 • • • • 0 SR -8 Appendix L: Priority Sport Routes for Road Bikes Routes Central City Loop Lamar Park Group Guide North Side Circuit Oso Bay Loop NORTH A-26 SR -9 Appendix L: Priority Sport Routes for Road Bikes A-27 Routes Central City Loop Lamar Park Group Guide North Side Circuit Oso Bay Loop NORTH uti Temple Perk •St sEiri sacki Park Ce • Nrookdale Park o mJ 1 VuUldsor Park SR -10 SR -12 EXHIBITA SR -10 Appendix L: Priority Sport Routes for Road Bikes Routes Central City Loop Lamar Park Group Guide North Side Circuit Oso Bay Loop NORTH A-28 SR -11 Appendix L: Priority Sport Routes for Road Bikes A-29 Routes Central City Loop Lamar Park Group Guide North Side Circuit Oso Bay Loop NORTH sack, Park Evelyn Jr., Price Park SR 80 18 • • 75. 'a0 Surrey Park • , • •••• •1:a' • Kingston •• Park ;5 ri 01 • MrailbU • SR -11 ••• o ,:f, ..<.,.,-•,,9 ,,4,,,:„. . .•.-lli'',4.,.,,,,-•,.,,.,,-.• - 1 03 , c .' l1Sknegae ,Z o . ,„„ ,i, (7• -' ,,, Park ,,?c.A" 4,-_ ;,,- 0'' ,/ 417 „ i to ;> C.4 ,, 0,' e , ,. -117 • k, Ara6 4,- `,--L- ir ••.. ''00 ,o, ;O 7' Schanen , O6 0 ,- ,Os Esptaa rtkes o_0o 4, ,en,0„,, :--O • 4, ,0'.41 7re LS rN e- eo,7 '.t,„, „,4 1.' C,..., 's 1, le , ""ti 11 ,,,,, , ,.tls 4 '1,-,. ''-'00,,,. ct, rfi,i, rtirP- 0 0,,, iek„ '79' o, :: ,.....,„ .g.7, 'CY Li0 , 7',, r, C.5 Lincoln 04, 74,0 Park ..0.. 4,7.117 ''''EXHIBIT A 43009' i Br ookdale Park ''•.. SR -10 - iiePu •• Park Windsor Park C'' Q ,.. Clo,,, ,-..' ikr,,, e 5 e,,i -..., irc i''',. •"- -ii ---' 'r- ' •i L Cullen Pork l.' Lona 4'3' Ck:' 6 ,f •\-' C!' :f ,, Sham, . ,,,,, 5r,s 1, ',k6 "Z ,,, ; at '6, li )L ,.- 1 ,,. -,:. z%,ei 3 r ,.3.. La P almera sm br c,,,, 66. 'i i '. Q' ' 'i'ikk Mall '''''''44, (",` 6,,,, ''''''kk144444.18 i'i5 j 6, Park Sunrise .:.:-7: ck" st.k Mall Glen Arbor ••• e e _e , •,„ Oso Beach Municipal 6011c—SR-12 S vd,3 St rt,a, Isia 4P AP PIP 5 07 03. 66 3581 SR -14 4, klk South*. Guth Park PO 10 40 40 EXHIBIT A 40 , • • • SR -15 SR -12 Appendix L: Priority Sport Routes for Road Bikes Routes Central City Loop _EN Lamar Park Group Guide North Side Circuit Oso Bay Loop NORTH A-30 SR -13 Appendix 1: Priority dSrikretsRoutes for A-31 Routes CentI City Loop Lan,' Park Group Guide North Side Oso By Loop NORTH 0 11 .............. SR -13 eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee SR -15 EXHIBIT A • • • • • • • c • • S "0, 13571 55 -12 .,, e -.. e ,........, •,.... ..,.:, 4, 4..4 % ,.., ',.... I<:•'. Lexington I Park ..5.' '0'ie ia,re i _ Str,a d,•,,,,,,,,, r, 75 0 ,,,- SR -14 -p9 iNindsong Park Lakeview • Park • Comas • Chrhti kled • Ctr-Bay Area • • • Sand, ",e, Park 0- g Brighton Park 'ix, 4, 0 [6t") 07 ,P 03' 95,05 -B ,0 „;7? 8,05_ 77„,°,0, 9,00, 'he EXHIBIT A Pk, 4, re /005 0„,!? SR -14 Appendix L: Priority Sport Routes for Road Bikes Routes Central City Loop Lamar Park Group Guide North Side Circuit Oso Bay Loop NORTH A-32 SR -15 Appendix L: Priority Sport Routes for Road Bikes A-33 Routes Central City Loop Lamar Park Group Guide North Side Circuit Oso Bay Loop NORTH Appendix L: Priority Sport Routes for Road Bikes Routes ■ Central City Loop Lamar Park Group Guide North Side Circuit Oso Bay Loop NORTH A-34 CREDITS Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization Staff: Jeffrey Pollack, AICP ENV SP, LEED AP BD -FC Transportation Planning Director Daniel V. Carrizales System Administrator Brigida Gonzalez Assistant Transportation Planning Director & Title VI Coordinator Victor Mendieta GIS Manager Elena J. Buentello, AICP Vilma lasso Matthew Blankenship Transportation Planner Executive Secretary GIS Technician Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization 5151 Flynn Parkway, Suite 404 Corpus Christi, Texas 78411-4318 Tel: (361) 884-0687 Fax: (361) 884-8529 E-mail: ccmpo@cctxmpo.us Website: www.corpuschristi-mpo.org Project Website: www.coastalbendinmotion.org Direct support for this plan provided by: City of Corpus Christi City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority Technical assistance with this plan provided by: Olivarri &ASSOCIATES rY The preparation of this report has been financed in part through gmnt[sl from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the State Planning and Research Program, Section 505 [or Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(nn] of Title 23, U.S. Code. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views orpolicyof the U.S. DepartmentofTransportation. Strategic Plan for Active Mobility Phase 1: Bicycle Mobility City of Corpus Christi City Council May 17, 2016 Jeff Pollack Transportation Planning Director CORPUS CHRISTI MP(' Active Mobility Plan Vision The metropolitan area of the Coastal Bend is a place where Nalking and biking are integral to the community culture and -epresent viable, safe travel and recreation options for -esidents and visitors of diverse abilities. Is, Objectives, Metrics Phase 1 Goals 1. Develop of a cohesive, strategic network of bicycle facilities that accommodates a diversity of riders. ?. Enhance bicycle mode share for trips of all types. 3. Promote health and wellness through bicycling. I-. Enhance safety for bicyclists. cle Mobility Network Overview � BICYCLE MOBILITY NETWORK OVERVIEW On Roadway Network* On Roadway Network* (Proposed) Off -Road Multi -use Trail 1 '14 4411 J K.Abikk wimp_ aide on9I do FeBry �rrIML `.niM3,1� 1 ktNUM I j cle Mobility Network Overview • et htmu NORTH 51 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid Implementation • • • 1 ■ ■ Bike Boulevard Bike Boulevard as Transitanal Treatment Buffered Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane as Transitional Treatment Multi -use Sidepath side) s Transitional Treatment Strategic Capital Investment 1 -way Cycle Track (both sides) Multi -use Sidepath (nn side); pink indicates side of treet on which facility should be installed Off Road Multi -use Trail Specialized Treatments Mid -block crossing I«ation ��d ��BaRret Del Mar C diene -Nest Corneas epperl Parr, Up River Fi one Him n„anar: Le 77. ]5 Ci CI Nan Pa ark • cle Mobility Network Overview Key inations Description % within % milE Bike Networl idemic Early education/Daycare centers, grade schools (public and private), higher education campuses 89% (158 of 175 'arks Greater than 2 acres in size 85% (122 of 14: 'ood Groceries, meat and fish markets, bakeries, corner markets 80% (104 of 13( -income )using Section 8 or Tax Credit properties 82% (541 of 65 'ansit Stops and stations 83% (1088 of 13: reation Pools, senior centers, recreation centers, movie theaters, fitness centers, museums and hotels 77% (186 of 24: eholder Engagement )utreach: 205 MAP IT routes by 99 discrete users 730+ discrete users logged 8353 routes via TRACK IT smartphone api 220 on-line ANSWER IT survey responses 25+ presentations by MPO Director or staff 15 public events attended by consulting team 50+ interviews conducted 900 + leaflets/posters distributed 5 focus groups conducted: [industry, business owners, design engineers, RTA operators, CCPD] eholder Engagement - CoastalBendlnMotion.org STRATEGIC PLAN FOR ACTIVE MOBILITY People -powered! Mobility para su corazon INTRODUCTION The Strategic Plan for Active Mobility for Nueces and San Patricia counties will replace the 2005 Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan. Phase I, Bicycle Mobility is underway; Phase II, Pedestrian Mobility, will follow in 2016. When finished, this Plan will be the roadmap for a cohesive network that links key destinations in the Coastal Bend and provides a meaningful and safe transportation altemative. Find answers to Frequently Asked Questions. VISION The metropolitan area of the Coastal Bend is a place where walking and biking are integral to the community culture and represent viable, safe mobility and recreation options for residents and visitors of diverse abilities. Share your thoughts on this VISION. hnatus Sp ohn I Imp -Shoreline MAP IT! Use our on-line mapping tool to show us where you ride or where you'd like to ride if the conditions for cycling improved. View a short (2 minute) video on how to use the mapping tool. TRACK IT! Download Strava to your Smartphone and use It to log the routes you ride. While originally designed as a tools for athletes, Strava can also be used to track the rides of commuting or recreational cyclist; the Bike Mobility planning team will use this information to identify priority routes. ANSWER IT! Take our very short (5 minute) on-line survey to share your priorities for community cycling programs and supporting infrastructure. 1 ork Development sere" Question: 2 -part analysis (blank slate approach) Primary Data Supplemental Data emic Institutions Vehicular Origins/Destinations (Travel Demand M Income Housing Employment to Population Ratio (TDM) ;it Stops/Stations/Bike Boardings Population and Employment Density (TDM) Zero Car Households (census) (> 2 acres) Bike to Work (census) ?ation/Tourism City of Corpus Christi Destination Nodes (2011 Sustainability Plan) 1 1 ork Development - Groundtruthing Network Groundtruthing and Refinement of Network • Comparison to user submitted routes • Extensive vetting o Municipal staff (multiple departments, Corpus Christi, Portland, Gregory) o Downtown stakeholders (DMD, CVB, SEA District) o ISAC officers o North Beach Community Association o NAS/CCAD o Realtors Association o Select developers o Nueces and San Patricio Counties o Texas A&M University — Corpus Christi I ork Development Infrastructure Selection wy 'at" Question — Facility Selection Not one -size -fits -all infrastructure Proprietary model Segment data inputs: o Traffic volume o Posted speed o ROW and shoulder widths o Number travel lanes o Number driveways o Presence of curb/gutter o Presence/utilization on -street parking structure Illustrations rard structure Illustrations Cycle Track, ides istrained ROW) structure Illustration Cycle Track, ides rained ROW) Vy Iiit 1 ork Development - Infrastructure Selection ini Infrastructure Type Network Miles w% Netv v Cost/High Impact/Rapid Implementation* major capital investment required other than paint and signage Bicycle Boulevard 64 2: Buffered Bike Lane 7 2 ttegic Capital Investments 1 -way Cycle Tracks 145 5( Multi -use Sidepaths 8 3 Off-road Multi -use Trails (on stormwater and old railroad easements) 66 2: 290 https://ccmpo.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=fd393dbf23c645f89180a818476354a7 1 1 structure Design lw" Question — Facility Design National standards for typology & design NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide as default Urban rio Bikeway Design Guide IM110mo Ass soda hook of CFIyTrantspr1- kP11° ur t Practice Recommendations Er Matrix of Best Practices Education & Encouragement Programs Cycling Skills and Safety Incentive and Reward Programs Lifestyle Promotion Planning and Public Health Supporting Infrastructure Trip Support Facilities Wayfinding Policy & Code Reform Planning Framework Codes and Law Enforcement Investing in Infrastructure Program Evaluation Performance Measures Program Oversight jpollack@cctxmpo.us www.corpuschristi-mpo.org www.CoastalBendlnMotion.org CORNUS C -I S MPt� AGENDA MEMORANDUM Public Hearing and First Reading for the City Council Meeting of May 17, 2016 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 DATE: April 26, 2016 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Daniel McGinn, Interim Director, Development Services Department DanielMc@cctexas.com (361) 826-3595 Public Hearing and First Reading for Property at 1802 through 1820 Buford Street CAPTION: Case No. 0416-02 The Salvation Army: A change of zoning from the "RS -6" Single - Family 6 District to the "CG-1/SP" General Commercial District with a Special Permit for a social service use. The property is described as being a 2.42 -acre tract of land, being all of Lots 1-16, Block 6 and a 15 -foot wide alley, Bay View No. 3, located between Hancock Avenue and Buford Avenue and between 16th Street and 15th Street. PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to rezone the property to allow a transitional housing facility. RECOMMENDATION: Denial of the change of zoning from the "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District to the "CG-1/SP" General Commercial District with a Special Permit and, in lieu thereof, approval of the "RS-6/SP" Single -Family 6 District with a Special Permit subject to the following conditions: 1. Use: The only use authorized by this Special Permit other than uses permitted in the base zoning district is a Transitional Housing facility, a social service use operated to assist families and veterans with their transition into permanent housing. The facility shall not exceed 220 beds. No soup kitchen or public feeding shall be allowed. For the purposes of this section, Transitional Housing is defined as a project that is designed to provide housing and appropriate supportive services to homeless persons to facilitate movement to independent living within 24 months, but the time limit could be longer. 2. Intake Facilities: Adequate waiting area inside the facility must be provided so that no perceived loitering or waiting outdoors occurs. 3. Security: The transitional housing facility located on the Property shall be monitored by staff at all times. 4. Landscaping: Landscape requirements for the Property shall be in compliance with standards for development as outlined in the UDC, except that the landscaping requirement of the street yards shall be met at 100% along 15th Street; 80% along Buford Avenue; 67% along Hancock Avenue; and 60% along 16th Street. 5. Building Design: The exterior facade of the building(s) may contain metal elements, however, metal elements shall not exceed 50% of a building's facade. The Owner shall incorporate windows and doors or other architectural enhancements on elevations that face the abutting residential development. 6. Building Height: The height of the building(s) shall not exceed 35 feet. 7. Lighting: Freestanding light poles on the Property shall not exceed 15 feet in height. The Owner shall comply with all other UDC lighting requirements. 8. Parking: Driveways shall be prohibited from being located on 15th Street. 9. Time Limit: In accordance with the UDC, this Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within 24 months of this ordinance unless a complete building permit application has been submitted, and the Special Permit shall expire if the allowed use is discontinued for more than six consecutive months. Vote Results: For: Unanimous Opposed: 0 Abstained: 2 Absent: 0 BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: As detailed in the attached report, the applicant is requesting a rezoning from the "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District to the "CG-1/SP" General Commercial District with a Special Permit to allow a Social Service Use. The applicant is proposing to construct 35,000 square foot facility that will house intact families. In total, the facility will have 220 beds, a dining and kitchen area to serve only those enrolled in the non -profit's transitional housing program, an open-air courtyard, multi-purpose classroom, administrative offices, parking and a playground. The Center will have 40 staff members and staff will be on-site to monitor the facility 24 hours a day. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use map and the policies of the Central Business Area Development Plan and staff finds that transitional housing facilities with sufficient organizational support can create positive impacts for the community. The applicant intends to improve the property by constructing a new social service facility that will replace existing structures and development of the site furthers policies pertaining to infill development. The Special Permit request meets all of the review criteria required by UDC Article 3.6.3. Special Permit Review Criteria. The applicant is in agreement with the Planning Commission and Staff recommendation. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the rezoning to "RS-6/SP" Single -Family 6 District with a Special Permit as recommended by Staff and Planning Commission. 2. Approve the request to "CG-1/SP" General Commercial District with a Special Permit. (requires 3/4 vote) 3. Deny the request. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not Applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Central Business Development Plan. The proposed rezoning to the "CG-1/SP" General Commercial District with a Special Permit for a transitional housing facility is consistent with elements of the Central Business Development Plan and consistent with the adopted Future Land Use Plan's designation of the property for Public/Semi-Public uses. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal and Planning Commission FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital • •Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015- 2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance for RS-6/SP Ordinance for CG-1/SP Presentation Planning Commission Final Report Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), upon application by The Salvation Army ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to a 2.42 acre tract of land, being all of Lots 1-16, Block 6 and a 15 foot wide alley, Bay View No. 3, from the "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District to the "RS-6/SP" Single -Family 6 District with a Special Permit for a social service use; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its final report and recommendation regarding the application of The Salvation Army ("Owner"), for an amendment to the City of Corpus Christi's Unified Development Code ("UDC") and corresponding UDC Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, April 20, 2016, during a meeting of the Planning Commission when the Planning Commission recommended denial of the change of zoning from the "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District to the "CG-1/SP" General Commercial District with a Special Permit and, in lieu thereof, approval of the "RS-6/SP" Single -Family 6 District with a Special Permit, and on Tuesday, May 17, 2016, during a meeting of the City Council, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve the public health, necessity, convenience and general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Upon application by The Salvation Army ("Owner"), the Unified Development Code ("UDC") of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas ("City"), is amended by changing the zoning on a 2.42 acre tract of land, being all of Lots 1-16, Block 6 and a 15 foot wide alley, Bay View No. 3, located between Hancock Avenue and Buford Avenue and between 16th Street and 15th Street (the "Property"), from the "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District to the "RS-6/SP" Single -Family 6 District with a Special Permit (Zoning Map No. 046043), as shown in Exhibits "A" and "B. Exhibit A, which is a metes and bounds description of the Property, and Exhibit B, which is a map to accompany the metes and bounds description, are attached to and incorporated in this ordinance by reference as if fully set out herein in their entireties. SECTION 2. The Special Permit granted in Section 1 of this ordinance is subject to the Owner meeting the following conditions: 1. Use: The only use authorized by this Special Permit other than uses permitted in the base zoning district is a Transitional Housing facility, a social service use operated to assist families and veterans with their transition into permanent housing. The facility shall not exceed 220 beds. No soup kitchen or public feeding shall be allowed. For the purposes of this section, Transitional Housing is defined as a project that is designed to provide housing and appropriate supportive services to homeless persons to facilitate movement to independent living within 24 months, but the time limit could be longer. 2. Intake Facilities: Adequate waiting area inside the facility must be provided so that no perceived loitering or waiting outdoors occurs. 3. Security: The transitional housing facility located on the Property shall be monitored by staff at all times. 4. Landscaping: Landscape requirements for the Property shall be in compliance with standards for development as outlined in the UDC, except that the landscaping requirement of the street yards shall be met at 100% along 15th Street; 80% along Buford Avenue; 67% along Hancock Avenue; and 60% along 1 6th Street. 5. Building Design: The exterior facade of the building(s) may contain metal elements, however, metal elements shall not exceed 50% of a building's facade. The Owner shall incorporate windows and doors or other architectural enhancements on elevations that face the abutting residential development. 6. Building Height: The height of the building(s) shall not exceed 35 feet. 7. Lighting: Freestanding light poles on the Property shall not exceed 15 feet in height. The Owner shall comply with all other UDC lighting requirements. 8. Parking: Driveways shall be prohibited from being located on 15th Street. 9. Time Limit: In accordance with the UDC, this Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within 24 months of this ordinance unless a complete building permit application has been submitted, and the Special Permit shall expire if the allowed use is discontinued for more than six consecutive months. SECTION 3. The official UDC Zoning Map of the City is amended to reflect changes made to the UDC by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 4. The UDC and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City, made effective July 1, 2011, and as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance, both remain in full force and effect. Page 2 of 4 SECTION 5. The change of zoning does not result in an amendment to the Future Land Use Map, an element of the Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 6. All ordinances or parts of ordinances specifically pertaining to the zoning of the Property and that are in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 7. Publication shall be made in the City's official publication as required by the City's Charter. Ordinance_RS-6 Special Permit Page 3 of 4 The foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre The foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 20 ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor Page 4 of 4 Exhibit A 2.42 Acres, Zoning Tract STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NUECES Job No. 43055.00.02 January 19`h, 2016 Revised: March 2, 2016 Fieldnotes, for 2.42 Acres, Zoning Tract, more or Tess, being all of Lots 1-16, Block 6 and a 15 Foot Wide Alley, Bay View No. 3, a map of which is recorded in Volume A, Page 25, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas; said 2.42 Acre Tract, being more fully described by metes and bounds as follows: Beginning, at the Right -of Way intersection of Sixteenth Street and Hancock Avenue, a public roadway, the Northwest corner of Lot 16, said Block 6, for the Northwest corner of this Tract; Thence, North 85°45'10" East, with the South line of the said Hancock Avenue, the North line of said Block 6, 279.00 Feet, to the Northeast corner of the said Block 6, at the Right -of -Way intersection of the said Hancock Avenue and Fifteenth Street, a public roadway, for the Northeast corner of this Tract; Thence, South 04°014'50" East, with the West line of the said Fifteenth Street, the East line of the said Block 6, 377.00 Feet, to the Southeast corner of the said Block 6, at the Right -of -Way intersection of the said Fifteenth Street and Buford Avenue, a public roadway, for the Southeast corner of this Tract; Thence, South 85°45'10" West, with the North line of the said Buford Avenue, the South line of the said Block 6, 279.00 Feet, to the Southwest corner of the said Block 6, at the Right -of -Way intersection of said Sixteenth Street and the said Buford Avenue, for the Southwest of this Tract; Thence, North 04°14'50" West, with the East line of the said Sixteenth Street, the West line of the said Block 6, 377.00 Feet, to the Point of Beginning, containing 2.42 Acres (105,183 Square Feet) of Land, more or less. Bearings based on GPS, NAD83 (2011), Texas Coordinate System of 1983, Texas South Zone 4205. This description was prepared from record information and does not represent a current on the ground Survey. Unless this fieldnote description, including preamble, seal and signature, appears in its entirety, in its original form, surveyor assumes no responsibility for its accuracy. Also reference accompanying sketch of Tract described S:ISurveying143055100021OFFICE'METES AND BOUNDS143055002 2.42Acres.doc (361)854-3101 URB N ENG Page 1 of 1 2725 SWANTNER DR. • CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78404 www.urbanong.com TBPE Firm #145 TBPLS Firm #10032400 Exhibit A wg5 \ James D. Carr, R.P.L.S. License No. 6458 FAX (361)854-6001 Point of Beginning --, L- �0 --, Co a`I d- x V) 90' 60' Hancock Avenue (60 R.O.W.) N85'45'10"E Lot 16 Lot 15 2.42 Acres, Zoning (105,183 Lot 14 0 o X HQ O Q 5, D of 13 D M o�U L CP ,, 3 odd m {0 >,Qz y Lot 2 0 _ m 0 r > a o 0co Z c Lot 11 Lot 10 Lot 9 S85'45'10"W Buford 30' 0' 60' 120' 279.00' Lot 1 S' of 2 Tract Sq. Ft.) Lot 3 0 6 w O 4-J T W ffl Lot 4 M -� o U �z W o.° z to N m> z N �Q of 5 o m o 5 > cn ° N o Lot 6 Lot 7 Lot 8 279.00' Exhibit B Avenue Sketch to Accompany (60' R.O.W.) FIELDNOTES Tract, Block which Page County, for 2.42 Acres, Zoning more or less, of Lots 1-16, 6, Bay View No. 3, a map of is recorded in Volume A, 25, Map Records of Nueces Texas. REV: March 2, 2016 DATE: Jan. 16 2016 SCALE: 1"=60 JOB NO.: 43055.00.02 SHEET: 1 of 2 DRAWN BY: RLG urbansurvey1@urbaneng.com 02016 by Urban Engineering riwo /7/7(11 Fi 1(1.77.5(1 Anit Fig • • • • • GRAPHIC SCALE 1"=60' — — LI URBAN ENGINEERING FIRM N0. 145, TBPLS FIRM N0. 10032400 2725 S NO OR, CORPUS NO. N .75404 COM PHONE: 381.854.3101 WWW.URBANENO.COM S•\Survayinrg\4•I(155\(1(1(17\FX4.1(155(NN17 Exhibit B Aerial Overview Vicinity Map 1 Aerial Overview Site Plan H AN COCK Ave. 15" 51: a • J. 41, HV I - 1 1-1 1, 3 Conditions 1. Uses: • Transitional Housing Facility • Up to 220 beds • Meals for residents only. 2. Intake Facilities: Adequate waiting area inside the facility. 3. Security: Monitored by staff at all times. 4. Landscaping: Per the UDC • 100% along 15th Street • 80% along Buford Avenue • 67% along Hancock Avenue • 60% along 16th Street. 4 Conditions 5. Building Design: • Up to 50 % of the facade can include metal elements. • Windows and doors required to face the abutting residential development. 6. Building Height: 35 feet. 7. Lighting: • Per UDC • Freestanding light poles at a 15 -foot maximum height. 8. Parking: No driveways on 15th Street. 9. Time Limit: 24 months 5 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL REPORT Case No. 0416-02 HTE No. 16-10000009 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 20, 2016 Applicant/Owner: Salvation Army Representative: Urban Engineering Legal Description/Location: Being a 2.42 acre tract of land, being all of Lots 1-16, Block 6 and a 15 foot wide alley, Bay View No. 3, located between Hancock Avenue and Buford Avenue and between 16th Street and 15th Street. From: "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District To: "CG-1/SP" General Commercial District with a Special Permit for a social service use Area: 2.42 acres Purpose of Request: To allow for a transitional housing facility. Existing Zoning District Existing Land Use Future Land Use Site "RS -6" Single - Family 6 Public/Semi-Public Public/Semi-Public North "ON" Office and "RM -3" Multifamily 3 Public/Semi-Public and Low Density Residential High Density Residential South "RS -6" Single - Family 6 Vacant and Low Density Residential Commercial East "RS -6" Single - Family 6 Low and Medium Density Residential Commercial West "RS -6" Single - Family 6 Crosstown Expressway (State Hwy 286) Crosstown Expressway (State Hwy 286) o N a o a a5 Area Development Plan: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Central Business Area Development Plan and is planned for Public/Semi-Public uses. The proposed rezoning to the "CG-1/SP" General Commercial District with a Special Permit is consistent with the adopted Future Land Use Map and the Central Business Area Development Plan. Map No.: 046043 Zoning Violations: None Planning Commission Final Report Page 2 Transportation Transportation and Circulation: The subject property has 280' of frontage along Buford Street to the south and Hancock Street to the north; and 375' along 16th Street to the west and 15th Street to the east. The Urban Transportation Plan identifies all four streets as local residential streets. Street R.O.W. Street Urban Transportation Plan Type Proposed Section Existing Section Traffic Volume Hancock Street Local Residential 50' ROW 28' paved 55' ROW 32' paved N/A Buford Street Local Residential 50' ROW 28' paved 60' ROW 30' paved N/A 16th Street Local Residential 50' ROW 28' paved 50' ROW 30' paved N/A 15th Street Local Residential 50' ROW 28' paved 55' ROW 30' paved N/A Staff Summary: Requested Zoning: The applicant is requesting a rezoning from the "RS -6" Single - Family 6 District to the "CG-1/SP" General Commercial District with a Special Permit to allow a Social Service Use. Specifically, the proposed Social Service Use will be a transitional housing facility that includes residences for families and veterans, a family service center with playground, a veterans work therapy program, and other care and training services. A transitional housing facility is not explicitly defined or identified in the Unified Development Code (UDC) and could be considered either a Social Service Use or Group Living Use. A later UDC text amendment will be needed to better define the transitional housing use and the zoning district where it is allowed. A Group Living Use is characterized as "Residential occupancy of a structure by a group of people that does not meet the definition of Household Living. Tenancy is usually arranged on a monthly or longer basis. Generally, Group Living structures have a common eating area for residents, and the residents may receive care or training." Social Services Uses are characterized in the UDC as "uses that primarily provide treatment of those with psychiatric, alcohol, or drug problems and transient housing related to social service programs." Until the UDC is amended through a public hearing process to determine the best category and zoning district for transitional housing facilities, Staff has conservatively determined that the use is best categorized as a Social Service Use. Planning Commission Final Report Page 3 Development Plan: The applicant is proposing to construct 35,000 square foot facility that will house intact families. In total, the facility will have 220 beds, a dining and kitchen area to serve only those enrolled in the non -profit's transitional housing program, an open-air courtyard, multi-purpose classroom, administrative offices, parking and a playground. The Center will have 40 staff members and staff will be on-site to monitory the facility 24 hours a day. Of the beds planned for the new facility, they are expected to be used for the following groups: approximately 73 percent for families, 18 percent for veterans, and 7 percent for work therapy, and 2 percent for emergency situations. The Center accepts new residents (single -men) under a 14 -day assessment period before they can be enrolled in the transitional housing programs. The conceptual floor layout of the proposed facility estimates the following square footage allocation per area as follows: SQ. FT. Family & Single Women Housing 9,810 Multipurpose & Classrooms 405 Administrative Offices 2,201 Dining & Kitchen Facilities 3,405 Single Men Housing 3,425 Mechanical and Janitor 2,985 Hallways 8,205 Existing Land Uses & Zoning: The subject property is zoned "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District and consists of a public/semi-public use (chapel, ball fields, and recreational facility). To the northwest is land zoned "ON" Office District and occupied by a day care facility and to the northeast are low density residential uses zoned "RM -3" Multifamily 3 District. To the south is zoned "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District and consists of a vacant lot and low density residential uses. East and west of the subject property is zoned "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District with low and medium density residential to the east and an expressway to the west. AICUZ: The subject property is not located in one of the Navy's Air Installation Compatibility Use Zones (AICUZ). Plat Status: The subject property is platted as several lots and will need to be replatted into one lot. Comprehensive Plan & Area Development Plan Consistency: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Central Business Development Plan. The proposed rezoning to the "CG-1/SP" General Commercial District with a Special Permit for a transitional housing facility is consistent with elements of the Central Business Development Plan and consistent with the adopted Future Land Use Plan's designation of the property for Public/Semi-Public uses. Additionally, the following are pertinent elements of the Central Business Development Plan and Comprehensive Plan Policy Statements that warrant consideration: Planning Commission Final Report Page 4 • Policy Statement, Public Safety and Neighborhood Improvement, PSNI 1.5: 1.) Create a committee to address the issues and needs of the homeless in the City; plan and work towards the placement of all homeless, unemployment services, and additional social needs and services in one building, in one area. • Comprehensive Plan Policy Statements on Residential, Statement F: Encourage infill development on vacant tracts within developed areas. • Comprehensive Plan Policy Statements on Social Services (pg. 52): A. Social service facilities should be provided in a systematic manner that ensures services are provided where they are most needed. In order to systematically provide these services, standards should be developed which are based on population size and the socio-economic characteristics of the population. B. Some social service facilities should meet the needs of specific populations. The quality and physical setting of all social services should be periodically reviewed, and improved if necessary, to meet the needs of the elderly, disabled, and other special population groups. UDC Special Permit Review Criteria: In determining whether to approve, approve with conditions or deny a special permit, the applicable review bodies shall consider the following criteria according to UDC Section 3.6.3: 1. The use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The use complements and is compatible with the surrounding uses and community facilities. 3. The impact of the use on public infrastructure such as roads, natural gas, water, storm water and wastewater systems, and on public services such as police and fire protection and solid waste collection can be minimized without negatively impacting existing uses in the area and in the City. 4. The use contributes to, enhances or promotes the welfare of adjacent properties and the surrounding area. 5. The use does not substantially adversely affect adjacent and neighboring uses. 6. The use does conform in all other respect to regulations and standards in the UDC. 7. If located within or adjacent to a residential area, the physical appearance, hours of operation and conduct of the use does not generate excessive noise, dust, smoke, glare, spillover lighting or other forms of environmental or visual pollution or otherwise detrimentally affect the residential character. 8. The development provides ample off-street parking and loading facilities. Planning Commission Final Report Page 5 Department Comments: • The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use map and the policies of the Central Business Area Development Plan. • Transitional housing facilities with sufficient organizational support can create positive impacts for the community. • The applicant intends to improve the property by constructing a new social service use facility that will replace existing structures. • Development of the site furthers policies pertaining to infill development. • The Special Permit request meets all of the review criteria required by UDC Article 3.6.3. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation: Denial of the change of zoning from the "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District to the "CG-1/SP" General Commercial District with a Special Permit and, in lieu thereof, approval of the "RS-6/SP" Single -Family 6 District with a Special Permit subject to the following conditions: 1. Use: The only uses authorized by this Special Permit other than uses permitted in the base zoning district is a Transitional Housing facility, a social service use operated to assist families and veterans with their transition into permanent housing. The facility shall not exceed 220 beds. No soup kitchen or public feeding shall be allowed. For the purposes of this section, Transitional Housing is defined as a project that is designed to provide housing and appropriate supportive services to homeless persons to facilitate movement to independent living within 24 months, but the time limit could be longer. 2. Intake Facilities: Adequate waiting area inside the facility must be provided so that no perceived loitering or waiting outdoors occurs. 3. Security: The transitional housing facility located on the Property shall be monitored by staff at all times. 4. Landscaping: Landscape requirements for the Property shall be in compliance with standards for development as outlined in the UDC, except that the landscaping requirement of the street yards shall be met at 100% along 15th Street; 80% along Buford Avenue; 67% along Hancock Avenue; and 60% along 16th Street. 5. Building Design: The exterior facade of the building(s) may contain metal elements, however, metal elements shall not exceed 50% of a building's facade. The Owner shall incorporate windows and doors or other architectural enhancements on elevations that face the abutting residential development. 6. Building Height: The height of the building(s) shall not exceed 35 feet. 7. Lighting: Freestanding light poles on the Property shall not exceed 15 feet in height. The Owner shall comply with all other UDC lighting requirements. Planning Commission Final Report Page 6 8. Parking: Driveways shall be prohibited from being located on 15th Street. 9. Time Limit: In accordance with the UDC, this Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within 24 months of this ordinance unless a complete building permit application has been submitted, and the Special Permit shall expire if the allowed use is discontinued for more than six consecutive months. Vote Results: For: Unanimous Opposed: 0 Abstained: 0 Absent: 0 Public Notification Number of Notices Mailed — 28 within 200 -foot notification area 7 outside notification area As of April 26, 2016: In Favor — 0 inside notification area — 0 outside notification area In Opposition — 6 inside notification area — 0 outside notification area Totaling 4.72% of the land within the 200 -foot notification area in opposition. Attachments: 1. Location Map (Existing Zoning & Notice Area) 2. Site Plan 3. Application 4. Public Comments Received K:\DevelopmentSvcs\SHARED\ZONING CASES\2016\0416-02 Salvation Army\Council Documents\Report 0416-02 Salvation Army.docx COLEMAN AVE R M - 3 COLEMAN AVE .:.:OCK'AVE B nv UFORD AVE R'S -6 1,11 GI z -40 N Co 03 0 73410 co a► 'o 0 RS -TF BUFORD AVE ti R SA:aT cp 03 co CRAIG ST 0-N Dae Created: 4/412016 Prepared By: JeremyM of Development S�tirices-N ti 400 Depattme CASE: 0416-02 ZONING & NOTICE AREA RM -1 Multifamily 1 RM -2 Multifamily 2 RM -3 Multifamily 3 ON Professional Office RM -AT Multifamily AT CN -1 Neighborhood Commercial CN -2 Neighborhood Commercial CR -1 CR -2 CG -1 CG -2 CI CBD CR -3 FR H BP Resort Commercial Resort Commercial General Commercial General Commercial Intensive Commercial Downtown Commercial Resort Commercial Farm Rural Historic Overlay Business Park IL Light Industrial IH Heavy Industrial PUD Planned Unit Dev. Overlay RS -10 Single -Family 10 RS -6 Single -Family 6 RS -4.5 Single -Family 4.5 RS -TF Two -Family RS -15 Single -Family 15 RE Residential Estate RS-TH Townhouse SP Special Permit RV Recreational Vehicle Park RMH Manufactured Home Subject Property O Owners with 200' buffer in favor 4 Owners within 200' listed on v Owners attached ownership table A in opposition EOPARD SUBJECT PROPERTY AGNES- �yD�NF LOCATION MAP City of Corpus Christi 4-1 ANcocV. AVE. N T 3vFoRP ST. r)oveloprnOnt Services Dept. P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 79469,9277 (364826,3249 Located at 2406 Leoparri Street • l, 1, -- IF. 1802 - .1820 BufOR) Street © CrOSstown 2,42 Acres 3. Subject Property Address: Area of Request (SF/acres): Current Zoning & We. . RS -6 WOrehlp Center/PAL center Proposed Zoning & Use :.-ocial ServiCG use; Tr.ans_iiieriel Living i.,aciiity I 0010 12 -Digit Nunes Countyrax D: 0488____ Subdivision Name: Bay View No. 3 Block: ._ 6 Lot(s): 1-16 and adj. aifEry Legal Description If not platted: Lots 1 through 16, Block 6, and adjacent alley, Bay View No. 3 16-10000004 REZONING APPLICATION CaseNe.:. 0416-02 Map No.: 046043 1.: PC Hearing Date: 4/20/16 Proj.Mgr Hearing Location: Cityklal colacingb4rnOers,_1201 Leopard SAreet; Hearing Time: 5:30,pfn TR 3-111-16 MAXIMUM OP FIVE REZONINGS CASES ARE SCHEDULED PER HEARING. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. 7g, n 47,74e1,7,,,,,Nr •,..,7',...m..,rne<M,177,74., ,,,,71,7.7=7,7•7^,er • • -L•771,,,,n4g'''''''.'11 Coritad Person : Xavier Galvan Applicant PrbOn Engineering VTaIing ArldreSs:2725 Swantner Drive • C state: TX 7,1 ; 78404 phone: c_361 j 854-3101 w777-7*7,77,17.7•hun .77.7.7777•71•7171. Cell: Lj 7 7;,,L+ 771,7777,77....ek,,,RU,V.,:prattra.1.,117,,, twa u, 7A77,:n tut.. mu gi 7,47, ,•7 77 ••• -7,1! The Salvation Arrny, a Georcila Corporation Properly Owner(s):contact Person : Gustavo Perez Northeast Expressway main° Address: 1424 Atlanta City: E -mai State• GA ZIP: 30329 , Phone: C.61 658-5610 ) Y.,.V 70, h • thhh, n.-1-Ahr/henriahlra.91 hAh. 4. Submittal Requirerrients: l Early Assistance Meeting: *1 Land Use Statement IF APPLICABI,E: El Peak Hour Trip Form, (if request is inconsistent with Future Land Use Plan) 0 Ste Plan for PUD or Special Perrnit Date Held 1-25-16 ; with city staff Door' Wood, miguei Al;rnan, Anmas drew Di & Juan Londe *1 Disclosure of Interest[ Copy of Warranty Deed toi Ntert,,es & Minds Descrirition with exhibit if property includes un -platted land (sealed by RPLS) C411 Appointment of Agent Form if landowner is not signing this form I 1 ceilify that I have provided the City or corpus Chnsti with a compluie applicatio;7or revle 1 7N as or on behalf of the Property Owner(s); and the hjJdrrnation 11 1 .___ „..,.., Owner or Agent's gnature 4 1 q LAMES K. SEILR. MEASURER _ ' Ownef os Agent'S Printed Name 0 Lien Holder Authorization t at. anthori4ed to initiate this rez,ening. ' te. Apt)! 'ant' gnature, rqAp, AppHcatit's Printed Name ;1! 2/23/16 R h-gh 7.7, 7, ,,7.7...trmr,,,vm7ez•an7:7.•=7:727•7.,,,71.7171,,,,,,,,-4-,,,,,,,,,rie,".7,7,7x.774 BKP Office Use. ()My: DOW Received: Received By: ADP: CB • Rezoning 'Fee: PUD Fee ...4. Sign Fee 40.00 =Total Pee 1732.50 No. Signs Requirkl 4 © 0/sign Sign Posting Date: K..,[3Ev—Fs.:-'1.6-partl'ilvcs7sHA(761ANE)iiv'67;i','47:5:41TA7r74.717:Allog FOM s \ zonING,AiNiNG Appucxrprit42()ii;:di:x; Fortn ReVited 5112r2015 LAND USE STATEMENT 1. State the purpose of the request and include applicable background information as to the development plan for the property, i.e., usage of property, number and square footage(s) of existing and/or proposed building(s)/unit(s), building(s)/unit(s) height, parking plans/spaces, phasing schedule of development, number of employee(s) associated with the office, business or industrial development, hours of operation, modification or demolition plans for existing structure(s), type, area and setback of signage, etc. The owner is requesting a change of zoning from RS -6 to CG -1 with special permit to allow for a transitional housing facility. The property is currently developed as a recreational facility. The developer is proposing a 35,000+1- square foot building that will be used to house intact families. It will have a family service center and will have a veterans and work therapy program. Plans include a playground and courtyard. Office hours will be Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The family service center is open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and includes monitoring staff. The center will have approximately 40 staff members. There will be approximately 38 parking spaces. 2. Identify the existing land uses adjoining the area of request: North - ON (Pre -K Center) and RM -3 (Residential) South - RS -6 (Residential) East - RS -6 (Residential) West - RS -6 (Crosstown Expressway) C1USER5ITANYAR DOOLDESKTOPIRAILY USESANNIKAILAND USE STATEMENT FOR ZONING.DOC DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons cr fi=ns seeKing to do business with the City to provide the following information Every question must be answered If the question is not applicableanswer with "NA". NAME: The Salvation Army, a Georgia corporation STREET 1424 Northeast Expressway CITY: Atlanta, Georgia ZIP: 30329 FIRM is Corporation Partnership Sole Owner °Association °Other DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name N/A Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each `official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name N/A Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name N/A Board, Commission, or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Consultant N/A CERTIFICATE I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested, and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the C__ itY_of Comus tioslistas as changes occur. Certifying Person. (Print Name) Signature of Certifying Person Title: Date 6,114oRp KIDCVELOPMENTSVCS15HAR C.LP.ND DEVELOPMENTWPPL'C ;TIO ORi'alREZON1NG'DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS STATEMENT_5.12 2015.DOC City of NM Corpus .= Christi DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS City of Corpus Christi, Texas Department of Development Sem cc: P 0 Box 9277 Carpus Cling!. Texas 78469. (361) 826-32417 Located at 2406 Leopard Street (Comer of Leopard St and Port Ave City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". NAME: Urban Engineering STREET: 2725 Swantner Drive CITY: Corpus Christi, Texas Zip: 78404 FIRM is. ❑x Corporation ❑ Partnership ❑ Sole Owner ❑ Association ❑ Other DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an `ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Job Title and City Department (if known) NIA 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an `ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Title N.`A 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Board, Commission, or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Consultant NA CERTIFICATE I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: x '° ° . 4 er (Print) Signature of Certifying Person: Title: tib- Date: 21-1(z, Lim K 1DEVELOPAIENTSVCS%SiiAREDLAND DEVELOPMENT OR 1FrX E ADMINISTRA7 ON APP (CATION FORM J ORM .h- PER LEGAL120121DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS STATEMENT 1.27 12 DOC Persons with disabilities planning to attend this meeting, who may require special services, are requested to contact the Development Services Department at least 48 hours in advance at (361) 826-3240. Personas con incapacidades, aue tienen la intention de asistir a este junta v cue recuieren servicios especiales. se les suolica aue den aviso 48 horas antes de la junta Ilamando al departamento de servicios de desarrollo. al ntamero (361) 826-3240. If you wish to address the Commission during the meeting and your English is limited, please call the Development Services Department at (361) 826-3240 at least 48 hours in advance to request an interpreter be present during the meeting. Si usted desea diriairse a la commission durante la iunta v su inales es limitado, favor de (lamer al departamento de s'o de desacr.lio al nim-ro 361 826-3240 al mends 48 horns antes se I. unta are solicitar un interprete ser presenterdlaqvig CITY PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE Rezoning Case No. 0416-02 The Salvation Army has petitioned the City of Co sus Ch to consider a change of zoning from the "RS -6" Sinc>Ile-Family 6 District to the "CG-1/SP eneral Comm- -" a Special Permit for a social service use. The a ns to . •nstruct a transitional living facility. he property to be rezoned is described as: Being a 2.42 acre tract of land, being all of Lots 1-16, Block 6 and a45 foot wide alley, Bay View No. 3, located between Hancock Avenue and Buford Avllhue and between 16th Street and 15th Street. The Planning Commission may recommend to City Council approval or denial, or approval of an lesser zoning classification with a Special Permit, or modify conditions of the Special Permit. Approval of a change of zoning, if inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, will also have the effect of amending the Comprehensive Plan to reflect the approved zoning. The Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing for this rezoning request to discuss and formulate a recommendation to the City Council. The public hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 20, 2016, during one of the Planning Commission's regular meetings, which begins at 5:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 1201 Leopard Street. You are invited to attend this public hearing to express your views on this rezoning request. For more information, please call (361) 826-3240. TO BE ON RECORD, THIS FORM MUST BE FILLED OUT, SIGNED BY THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER(S) AND MAILED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, P. O. BOX 9277, CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78469- 9277. ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED BELOW BECOMES PUBLIC RECORD. NOTE: In accordance with the Planning Commission By -Laws, no discussion shall be held by a member or members of this Commission with an applicant or appellant concerning an application or appeal, either at home or office, or in_person, by telephone call or by letter. Printed Name: orb 12 L Address: ?'— /5-711,5-f ( ) IN FAVOR REASON: N OPPOSITION APR 1 2016 1 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES l? Sig ure L SPECIAL SERVICES .SEE MAP ON REVERSE SIDE Property Owner ID: 28 HTE# 16-10000009 City/State:Ca F*5a. r .e. 3 je i a Phone: 32et V• Case No. 0416-02 Project Manager Dolores Wood 1 Persons with disabilities planning to attend this meeting, who may require special services, are requested to contact the Development Services Department at least 48 hours in advance at (361) 826-3240. Personas con incapacidades, aue tienen la intention de asistir a esta junta v que requieren servicios especiales. se les suplica aue den aviso 48 horas antes de la [unta Ilamando al departamento de servicios de desarrollo. al niumero (361) 826-3240. If you wish to address the Commission during the meeting and your English is limited, please call the Development Services Department at (361) 826-3240 at least 48 hours in advance to request an interpreter be present during the meeting. Si usted desea diriairse a Ia commission durante Ia junta v su inaies es limitado. favor de llamar al departamento de servicios de desarrollo al numero (361) 826-3240 al menos 48 horas antes de la junta para solicitar un interprete ser presente durante la junta. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Rezoning Case No. 0416-02 The Salvation_Army has petitioned the City of Corpus Christi to consider a change of zoning from the "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District to the "CG-1/SP" General Commercial District with a Special Permit for a social service use. The applicant plans to construct a transitional living facility. The property to be rezoned is described as: Being a 2.42 acre tract of land, being all of Lots 1-16, Block 6 and a 15 foot wide alley, Bay View No. 3, located between Hancock Avenue and Buford Avenue and between 16th Street and 15th Street. The Planning Commission may recommend to City Council approval or denial, or approval of an lesser zoning classification with a Special Permit, or modify conditions of the Special Permit. Approval of a change of zoning, if inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, will also have the effect of amending the Comprehensive Plan to reflect the approved zoning. The Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing for this rezoning request to discuss and formulate a recommendation to the City Council. The public hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 20, 2016, during one of the Planning Commission's regular meetings, which begins at 5:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 1201 Leopard Street. You are invited to attend this public hearing to express your views on this rezoning request. For more information, please call (361) 826-3240. TO BE ON RECORD, THIS FORM MUST BE FILLED OUT, SIGNED BY THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER(S) AND MAILED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, P, 0. BOX 9277, CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78469- 9277. ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED BELOW BECOMES PUBLIC RECORD. NOTE: In accordance with the Planning Commission By -Laws, no discussion shall be held by a member or members of this Commission with an applicant or appellant concerning an application or appeal, either at home or office, or inperson, by telephone call or by letter. Printed Name: li eitgAin r Address: f 1OLo— %lp Ili City/State•rx C i + , { ) IN FAVOR (X IN OPPOSITION Phone: (3L17 g g REASON: SEE MAP ON REVERSE SIDE Property Owner ID: 25 HTE# 16-10000009 ;' I 5 l J Signature 71"--r Case No. 0416-02 Project Manager Dolores Wood Persons with disabilities planning to attend this meeting, who may require special services, are requested to contact the Development Services Department at least 48 hours in advance at (361) 826-3240. Personas con incapacidades, aue tienen la intention de asistir a esta junta v sue reauieren servicios especiales, se les suplica aue den aviso 48 horas antes de la junta Ilamando al departamento de servicios de desarrollo, al ntimero (3611 826-3240. If you wish to address the Commission during the meeting and your English is limited, please call the Development Services Department at (361) 826-3240 at least 48 hours in advance to request an interpreter be present during the meeting. Si usted desea diriairse a la commission durante la iunta v su inales es limitedo, favor de Ilamar al departamento de servicios de desarrollo al ntimero (361) 826-3240 al menos 48 horas antes de la junta para solicitar un interprets ser oresente durante 12 junta APR 21 2616 r ITY PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Rezoning Case No. 0416-02 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES T SaI 61 'JAl $\f1g tined the City of Corpus Christi to consider a change of zoning from the "R -6" Single -Family 6 District to the "CG-1/SP" General Commercial District with a Special Permit for a social service use. The applicant plans to construct a transitional living facility. The property to be rezoned is described as: Being a 2.42 acre tract of land, being all of Lots 1-16, Block 6 and a 15 foot wide alley, Bay View No. 3, located between Hancock Avenue and Buford Avenue and between 16th Street and 15th Street. The Planning Commission may recommend to City Council approval or denial, or approval of an lesser zoning classification with a Special Permit, or modify conditions of the Special Permit. Approval of a change of zoning, if inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, will also have the effect of amending the Comprehensive Plan to reflect the approved zoning. The Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing for this rezoning request to discuss and formulate a recommendation to the City Council. The public hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 20, 2016, during one of the Planning Commission's regular meetings, which begins at 5:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 1201 Leopard Street. You are invited to attend this public hearing to express your views on this rezoning request. For more information, please call (361) 826-3240. TO BE ON RECORD, THIS FORM MUST BE FILLED OUT, SIGNED BY THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER(S) AND MAILED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, P. O. BOX 9277, CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78469- 9277. ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED BELOW BECOMES PUBLIC RECORD. NOTE: In accordance with the Planning Commission By -Laws, no discussion shall be held by a member or members of this Commission with an applicant or appellant concerning an application or appeal, either at home or office, or in-person, by telephone call or by letter. Address: 51 11 ,L,4kE /2 kook_ ( ) IN FAVOR (N OPPOSITION REASON: ---7-1-74- 4,;11 Cie p LE-CiF 7E PSP 62 SEE MAP ON REVERSEIDE Property Owner ID: 27 / HTE# 16-10000009 City/State:SAAJ , I PTDA D I X Phone: 410 a .3 7 9co e IVG2 Signature Case No. 0416-02 Project Manager: Dolores Wood Persons with disabilities planning to attend this meeting, who may require special services, are requested to contact the Development Services Department at least 48 hours in advance at (361) 826-3240. Personas con incapacidades, aue tienen la intencion de asistir a esta junta v aue reauieren servicios especiales, se les suplica aue den aviso 48 horas antes de la junta Ilamando al departamento de servicios de desarrollo, al ntimero (361) 826-3240. If you wish to address the Commission during the meeting and your English is limited, please call the Development Services Department at (361) 826-3240 at least 48 hours in advance to request an interpreter be present during the meeting. Si usted desea diriairse a la commission durante la iunta v su inales es limitado, favor de Ilamar al departamento de servicios de desarrollo al numero (361) 826-3240 al menos 48 horas antes de la junta para solicitar nint&vete Ser presente-d nte-ia junta. EUEvt , CITY PLANNING COMMISSION PR 21 2016 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Rezoning Case No. 0416-02 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SPFCIAL SERVICES he -Salvation Arm hem petitioned the City of Corpus Christi to consider a change of zoning from the ` RS -6" Single -Family 6 District to the "CG-1/SP" General Commercial District with a Special Permit for a social service use. The applicant plans to construct a transitional living facility. The property to be rezoned is described as. Being a 2.42 acre tract of land, being all of Lots 1-16, Block 6 and a 15 foot wide alley, Bay View No. 3, located between Hancock Avenue and Buford Avenue and between 16th Street and 15th Street. The Planning Commission may recommend to City Council approval or denial, or approval of an lesser zoning classification with a Special Permit, or modify conditions of the Special Permit. Approval of a change of zoning, if inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, will also have the effect of amending the Comprehensive Plan to reflect the approved zoning. The Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing for this rezoning request to discuss and formulate a recommendation to the City Council. The public hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 20, 2016, during one of the Planning Commission's regular meetings, which begins at 5:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 1201 Leopard Street. You are invited to attend this public hearing to express your views on this rezoning request. For more information, please call (361) 826-3240. TO BE ON RECORD, THIS FORM MUST BE FILLED OUT, SIGNED BY THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER(S) AND MAILED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, P. O. BOX 9277, CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78469- 9277. ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED BELOW BECOMES PUBLIC RECORD. NOTE: In accordance with the Planning Commission By -Laws, no discussion shall be held by a member or members of this Commission with an applicant or appellant concerning an application or appeal, either at home or office, or in person, by telephone call or by letter. Printed Name;,.. 46- Address: /77/ K 8I€WK City/State��il AN 7zW/0 77( JU " ( ) IN FAVOR (1�1�OPPOSITION Phone: c �3 7 9�J REASON: X11/ dep02-ee/A-T 06/2 peOpERry, SEE MAP ON REVERSE SIDE Property Owner ID: 2 /'+ HTE# 16-10000009 t/Tt. Ca.d—etAA41 Signat e Case No. 0416-02 Project Manager: Dolores Wood Persons with disabilities planning to attend this meeting, who may require special services, are requested to contact the Development Services Department at least 48 hours in advance at (361) 826-3240. Personas con incapacidades. que tienen la intention de asistir a esta junta v cue reauieren servicios especiales, se les suplica Que den aviso 48 horas antes de la Junta Ilamando al departamento de servicios de desarrollo, al numero (361) 826-3240. If you wish to address the Commission during the meeting and your English is limited, please call the Development Services Department at (361) 826-3240 at least 48 hours in advance to request an interpreter be present during the meeting. Si usted desea dirioirse a la commission durante la junta v su inoles es limitedo, favor de Ilamar al departamento de servicios de desarrollo al numero (361) 826-3240 al menos 48 horas antes de la junta para solicitar 'nterDrete.ser_.DreseDte durante la junta. t Cavi APR 21 2016 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES P vC©�SERVICESs petitioned the City of Corpus Christi to consider a change of zoning from the RS -6" Single -Family 6 District to the "CG-1/SP" General Commercial District with a Special Permit for a social service use. The applicant plans to construct a transitional living facility. The property to be rezoned is described as: CITY PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Rezoning Case No. 0416-02 Being a 2.42 acre tract of land, being all of Lots 1-16, Block 6 and a 15 foot wide alley, Bay View No. 3, located between Hancock Avenue and Buford Avenue and between 16th Street and 15th Street. The Planning Commission may recommend to City Council approval or denial, or approval of an lesser zoning classification with a Special Permit, or modify conditions of the Special Permit. Approval of a change of zoning, if inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, will also have the effect of amending the Comprehensive Plan to reflect the approved zoning. The Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing for this rezoning request to discuss and formulate a recommendation to the City Council. The public hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 20, 2016, during one of the Planning Commission's regular meetings, which begins at 5:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 1201 Leopard Street. You are invited to attend this public hearing to express your views on this rezoning request. For more information, please call (361) 826-3240. TO BE ON RECORD, THIS FORM MUST BE FILLED OUT, SIGNED BY THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER(S) AND MAILED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, P. O. BOX 9277, CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78469- 9277. ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED BELOW BECOMES PUBLIC RECORD. NOTE: In accordance with the Planning Commission By -Laws, no discussion shall be held by a member or members of this Commission with an applicant or appellant concerning an application or appeal, either at home or office, or inperson, by telephone call or by letter. Printed Name:105& ?ot3T� A2i7-JA e/4,5iiao VA Address:. --9 / 1 CA ( B Rook City/State: SA,J Ali TDN/O JTY ( ) IN FAVOR (t1 OPPOSITION Phone: a lb. ) 31 9 FO g REASON: f will ode pQ ccm but p 2opc-a_rti SEE MAP ON REVERSE SID_ E Properly Owner ID: 8 .." HTE# 16-10000009 WuaAA9 eia-va•44 Signa re Case No. 0416-02 Project Manager. Dolores Wood Persons with disabilities planning to attend this meeting, who may require special services, are requested to contact the Development Services Department at least 48 hours in advance at (361) 826-3240. Personas con incaoacidades. aue tienen la intention de asistir a esta junta v aue reauieren servicios esoeciales, se les sualica aue den aviso 48 horas antes de la junta llamando al departamento de servicios de desarrollo. al numero (361) 826-3240. If you wish to address the Commission during the meeting and your English is limited, please call the Development Services Department at (361) 826-3240 at least 48 hours in advance to request an interpreter be present during the meeting. Si usted desea diriairse a la commission durante la iunta v su irides es limitado, favor de Ilamar al departamento de servicios de desarrollo al nCimero (361) 826-3240 al menos 48 horas antes de la junta para solicitar un it t' te ser oresente dura a unta. APR 21 2016 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SPECIAL SERVICES CITY PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Rezoning Case No. 0416-02 The Salvation Army has petitioned the City of Corpus Christi to consider a change of zoning from the "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District to the "CG-1/SP" General Commercial District with a Special Permit for a social service use. The applicant plans to construct a transitional living facility. The property to be rezoned is described as: Being a 2.42 acre tract of land, being all of Lots 1-16, Block 6 and a 15 foot wide alley, Bay View No. 3, located between Hancock Avenue and Buford Avenue and between 16th Street and 15th Street. The Planning Commission may recommend to City Council approval or denial, or approval of an lesser zoning classification with a Special Permit, or modify conditions of the Special Permit. Approval of a change of zoning, if inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, will also have the effect of amending the Comprehensive Plan to reflect the approved zoning. The Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing for this rezoning request to discuss and formulate a recommendation to the City Council. The public hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 20, 2016, during one of the Planning Commission's regular meetings, which begins at 5:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 1201 Leopard Street. You are invited to attend this public hearing to express your views on this rezoning request. For more information, please call (361) 826-3240. TO BE ON RECORD, THIS FORM MUST BE FILLED OUT, SIGNED BY THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER(S) AND MAILED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, P. O. BOX 9277, CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78469- 9277. ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED BELOW BECOMES PUBLIC RECORD. NOTE: In accordance with the Planning Commission By -Laws, no discussion shall be held by a member or members of this Commission with an applicant or appellant concerning an application or appeal, either at home or office, or in_person, by telephone call or by letter. Printed Name:! (_ Address: ( C L___C7 ' ( ) IN FAVORIN OPPOSITION REASON: SEE MAP ON REVERSE SIDE Property Owner ID. 7 HTE# 16-10000009 Signature City/State: C 7 L Phone: I( 57 Case No. 0416-02 Project Manager: Dolores Wood AGENDA MEMORANDUM Public Hearing and First Reading for the City Council Meeting of May 17, 2016 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 DATE: April 26, 2016 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Daniel McGinn, Interim Director, Development Services Department DanielMc@cctexas.com (361) 826-3595 Public Hearing and First Reading for Property at 22-26 and 34-37 N. Country Club Drive, and 39, 41, 42, and 56 Country Club Drive CAPTION: Case No. 0416-03 Magellan Terminals Holdings, LP: A change of zoning from the "RS - 6" Single -Family 6 District, "ON" Office District and "RM -1" Multifamily 1 District to the "IL" Light Industrial District. The property is described as Lots 22-26, 34-42 and 55-56, Country Club Place, located on the north side of Interstate Highway 37, between Up River Road and Poth Lane. PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to rezone the property to allow light industrial uses. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (April 20, 2016): Approval of the change of zoning from the "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District, "ON" Office District and "RM -1" Multifamily 1 District to the "IL" Light Industrial District. Vote Results For: Unanimous Opposed: 0 Abstained: 0 Absent: 0 BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: As detailed in the attached report, the applicant is proposing rezoning to the "IL" Light Industrial District to accommodate office and warehousing uses to support existing industrial development as well as to create opportunity for future development typically found in a light industrial district. The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Westside Area Development Plan (ADP). The proposed rezoning to the "IL" Light Industrial District is not consistent with the Westside ADP or the adopted Future Land Use Plan's designation of the property as low density residential. In this case, however, it is clear that a change to the Future Land Use Map is warranted. The subject property is located in an abandoned single-family subdivision in a heavy industrial area of Corpus Christi adjacent to Refinery Row. Ownership records with the Nueces County Appraisal District indicate the lots in the neighborhood currently are owned by several different industrial companies, including Citgo Refining and Chemicals, Flint Hills Resources and Mark West Javelina Co., LLC. It is staffs opinion the abandoned neighborhood should be rezoned and redeveloped to provide uses needed to support industry, meanwhile also establishing compatibility with existing uses. Staff believes that the proposed rezoning would not negatively impact the surrounding residential properties and is compatible with the neighboring industrial users to the north and west abutting the abandoned residential subdivision. The property to be rezoned is suitable for uses permitted by the zoning district that would be applied by the proposed amendment. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Deny the request. 2. Approve an intermediate zoning district. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not Applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The subject property is located within the boundaries of Westside Area Development Plan. The proposed rezoning deviates from the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use map, however, based on existing development, lack of redevelopment of the subject property and ownership patterns in the immediate vicinity, a change to the Future Land Use Map is warranted. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal and Planning Commission FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital 0 Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015- 2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Presentation - Aerial Map Planning Commission Final Report Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), upon application by Magellan Terminals Holdings, LP ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to Lots 22-26, 34-42 and 55-56, Country Club Place, from the "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District, "ON" Office District and "RM -1" Multifamily 1 District to the "IL" Light Industrial District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its final report and recommendation regarding the application of Magellan Terminals Holdings, LP ("Owner"), for an amendment to the City of Corpus Christi's Unified Development Code ("UDC") and corresponding UDC Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, April 20, 2016, during a meeting of the Planning Commission when the Planning Commission recommended approval of the change of zoning from the "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District, "ON" Office District and "RM -1" Multifamily 1 District to the "IL" Light Industrial District, and on Tuesday, May 17, 2016, during a meeting of the City Council, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve the public health, necessity, convenience and general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Upon application made by Magellan Terminals Holdings, LP ("Owner"), the Unified Development Code ("UDC") of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas ("City"), is amended by changing the zoning on Lots 22-26, 34-42 and 55-56, Country Club Place, located on the north side of Interstate Highway 37, between Up River Road and Poth Lane (the "Property"), from the "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District, "ON" Office District and "RM -1" Multifamily 1 District to the "IL" Light Industrial District (Zoning Map No. 049045), as shown in Exhibits "A" and "B". Exhibit A, which is a metes and bounds description of the property, and Exhibit B, which is a map to accompany the metes and bounds description, are attached to and incorporated in this ordinance by reference as if fully set out herein in their entireties. SECTION 2. The official UDC Zoning Map of the City is amended to reflect changes made to the UDC by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 3. The UDC and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City, made effective July 1, 2011, and as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance, both remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. The City's Future Land Use Map, an element of the Comprehensive Plan, is amended to designate the Property for light industrial uses. SECTION 5. All ordinances or parts of ordinances specifically pertaining to the zoning of the Property and that are in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 6. Publication shall be made in the City's official publication as required by the City's Charter. The foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre The foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 20 ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor Ordinance_Magellan Terminals Holdings, LP Page 2 of 2 MURRAY BASS, JR., P.E., R.P.L.S. NIxoN M. WELSH, P.E., R.P.L.S. www.bass-we1sh.com e-mail: nixmw@aol.com BASS & WELSH ENGINEERING TX Registration No. F-52 Survey Registration No. 100027-00 P.O. Box 6397 Corpus Christi. TX 78466-6397 February 17, 2016 Field Note Description Rezoning 3054 S. ALAMEDA, ZIP 78404 361 882-5521-- FAX 361 882-1265 e-mail: murrayjr@aol.com Being three tracts situated in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas, comprised of lots and portions of lots in Country Club Place Subdivision, as shown on the map thereof recorded in Volume 4 at Page 3 of the Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, and being more particularly as described in the following description: Tract No. 1 Comprised of Lots 22, 23, 24, 25, and that portion of Lot 26 lying outside of the right-of-way of Interstate Highway 37; BEGINNING at a point in the west boundary of Lot 26 where it is intersected by the north right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 37 for the southwest corner of this tract; THENCE N 23°10'15" E along the west boundary of Lots 26, 25, 24, 23 and 22 a distance of 457.14 to the northwest corner of Lot 22 for the northwest corner of this tract; THENCE S 54°11"16" E along the north boundary of Lot 22, a distance of 212.70 feet to a point in the east boundary of Lot 22, said point lying in the west boundary of the former North Country Club Place Street that was closed by Ordinance No. 028963 and retained as a utility easement, said point lying on a curve to the left; THENCE along said curve to the left whose radius is 149.46 feet in a southwesterly direction, a distance of 5.86 feet; said curve having a chord bearing S 31°03'41" W with a chord length of 5.86 feet to the point of tangency of said curve; THENCE S 26°49'47" W along the east boundary of Lots 22, 23, 24 and 25, a distance of 344.04 feet to a point of intersection with the north right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 37; THENCE N 85°13'22" W along the north right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 37 along the current south boundary of Lots 25 and 26 a distance of 194.73 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING forming a tract embracing 1.812 acres. Tract No. 2 Comprised of Lots 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 and those portions of Lots 34, 35, 41 and 42 lying north of the north right- of-way line of Interstate Highway 37 in the Country Club Place Subdivision; BEGINNING at the intersection of the west boundary of Lot 34 with the north right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 37 for the southwest corner of this tract; THENCE N 26°57'01" E a distance of 312.00 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the right; THENCE along said tangent curve to the right, whose radius is 98.94 feet in a northeasterly and southeasterly direction, a distance of 124.16 feet; said curve having a chord bearing N75°30'43"E with a chord length of 116.17' to the point of tangency of said curve; EXHIBIT A Page 1 of 2 THENCE along the north line of Lots 38 and 39, S 59°40'33" E a distance of 163.00 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the right; THENCE along said tangent curve to the right whose radius is 92.58 feet in a southeasterly and southerly direction, a distance of 128.58 feet; said curve having a chord bearing S16°35'45"E with a chord length of 118.49' to the point of tangency of said curve; THENCE S 27°34'10" W along the east boundary of Lots 39, 40 and 41, and distance of 160.51 feet to a point where the east boundary of Lot 41 intersects the north right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 37; THENCE with the current south boundary of Lots 41, 42, 35 and 34 on the north boundary along the north right-of-way line of Interstate highway 37 as follows: S 58°42'55" W a distance of 17.45 feet to a point; N 84°08'19" W a distance of 80.27 feet to a point; N 86°12'26" W a distance of 238.63 feet to a point; THENCE N 52°58'18" W a distance of 26.63 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, forming a tract embracing 2.415 acres. Tract No. 3 Comprised of Lot 56 and that portion of Lot 55, lying north of the north right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 37; BEGINNING at the intersection of the west boundary of Lot 55 with the north right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 37 for the southwest corner of this tract; THENCE N 26°30'44" E along the west boundary of Lot 55 and 56 a distance of 100.68 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the right; THENCE along said tangent curve to the right, whose radius is 99.58 feet said curve having a chord bearing of N69°54'02"E with a chord length of 118.25, in a northeasterly and southeasterly direction, a distance of 126.60 feet to the point of tangency of said curve; THENCE along the north boundary of Lot 56, S 60°19'30" E a distance of 83.37 feet to a point for the northeast corner of this tract; THENCE S 26°30'44" W along the east boundary of Lot 56 and 55 a distance of 122.98 feet to its intersection with the north right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 37 for the southeast corner of this tract; THENCE N 88°51'36" W along the south boundary of Lot 55 a distance of 148.67 feet to a point for an intermediate corner of this tract; THENCE continuing along the north right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 37, N 54°40'49" W a distance of 30.50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING forming a tract embracing 0.574 acres. rray Bass, +r., R.P.L.S. Note: Basis of Bearing is State of Texas Lambert Grid, South Zone, NAD 1983. MBJ:sab 15018 -Field Note-Rezoning.doc EXHIBIT A Page 2of2 O ?'00 1 0 / a. J a 0) CICU A 0 J 0 in W d z E. 3z fn z 4• SU ` z gZL • UN G cc a 0<> y z N 0 s 0 a A 0 J � o I Uin I O z x iP. w3 c I 4 o Ra :41.-f fi s 2 W n N 0 A z RIG HT -OF -WAY cn e s'c von to 000 O 00 dl Rlli 0k. 00 Baa 8 a e m V �., to qz N N 0 0 U U T IZ L' LY s r 4, n k ti 0P K Ls 41 K Si 01 K 9 2 2 14 1.1 L3 z A K 0 r. F3 h CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND O @ as 51 85 EXHIBIT B Aerial Overview Aerial PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL REPORT Case No. 0416-03 HTE No. 16-10000012 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 20, 2016 Applicant & Legal Description Applicant/Owner: Magellan Terminals Holdings, LP Legal Description/Location: Lots 22-26, 34-42 and 55-56, Country Club Place, located on the north side of Interstate Highway 37, between Up River Road and Poth Lane. Zoning Request From: "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District, "ON" Office District and "RM -1" Multifamily 1 District To: "IL" Light Industrial District Area: 4.8 acres Purpose of Request: To allow light industrial uses. Existing Zoning and Land Uses Existing Zoning District Existing Land Use Future Land Use Site "RS -6" Single - Family 6 District, "ON" Office District and "RM -1" Multifamily 1 District Vacant and Office Low Density Residential North "RS -6" Single- Family 6 and "ON" Office District Vacant Low Density Residential and Professional Office South "RS -6" Single - Family 6 District and "CN -1" Neighborhood Commercial District Vacant and Low Density Residential Commercial and Low Density Residential East "RS -6" Single- Family 6 Vacant Low Density Residential West Outside City Limits Heavy Industrial Heavy Industrial Planning Commission Final Report Page 2 0.5 o 2 a o a5 Area Development Plan: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Westside Area Development Plan and is planned for low density residential uses. The proposed rezoning to the "IL" Light Industrial District is not consistent with the adopted Future Land Use Map or the Westside Area Development Plan. Map No.: 049045 Zoning Violations: None Transportation Transportation and Circulation: The subject property has approximately 715 feet of street frontage along the north side of Interstate Highway 37 Access Road, which is an "F1" Freeway/Expressway. Street R.O.W. Street Urban Transportatio n Plan Type Proposed Section Existing Section Traffic Volume (2013) Interstate Highway 37 Access Road "F1" Freeway/ Expressway 400' ROW Paved -Varies 310' ROW 260' paved 1,697 ADT Staff Summary: Requested Zoning: The applicant is requesting a rezoning from the "RS -6" Single - Family 6 District to the "IL" Light Industrial District to allow industrial uses. Development Plan: The applicant is proposing rezoning to the "IL" Light Industrial District to accommodate office and warehousing uses to support existing industrial development as well as to create opportunity for future development typically found in a light industrial district. Existing Land Uses & Zoning: The subject property is zoned "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District, "ON" Office District and "RM -1" Multifamily 1 District and is vacant except for one lot which consists of medium density residential. To the north is zoned "RS -6" Single -Family 6 and "ON" Office District and is vacant. South of the subject property is zoned "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District, "ON" Office District and "RM -1" Multifamily 1 District and consists of the northbound side of Interstate Highway 37 Access Road. To the east is vacant land zoned "RS -6" Single -Family 6 and west of the subject property is Outside City Limits and consists of heavy industrial uses. AICUZ: The subject property is not located in one of the Navy's Air Installation Compatibility Use Zones (AICUZ). Plat Status: The subject property is platted. Planning Commission Final Report Page 3 Comprehensive Plan & Area Development Plan Consistency: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Westside Area Development Plan (ADP). The proposed rezoning to the "IL" Light Industrial District is not consistent with the Westside ADP or the adopted Future Land Use Plan's designation of the property as low density residential. In this case, however, it is clear that a change to the Future Land Use Map is warranted. The following are policies that warrant consideration in deliberating on this matter. - Infill development should be encouraged on vacant tracts within developed areas (Comprehensive Plan Residential Policy Statement H) - Incompatible industrial and commercial land uses should not abut residential areas (Comprehensive Plan Residential Policy Statement I) - Provide adequate and suitably -zoned land for both light and heavy industries (Comprehensive Plan Industrial Policy Statement A) - High-intensity commercial and industrial areas should be buffered to provide transition from residential areas through the existence of (b) public institutional buildings (d) scale of design. (Westside Area Development Plan, Policy Statement C.5). - Industrial properties should be required to minimize undesirable "spillover effects" into residential and commercial areas (this includes noise, air pollution, negligent visual blight, etc.) by means of property layout and organization of activities by screening and maintaining buffer areas or zones for their activities. (Westside Area Development Plan, Policy Statement C.6). Department Comments: • The proposed rezoning deviates from the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use map, however, based on existing development, lack of redevelopment of the subject property and ownership patterns in the immediate vicinity, a change to the Future Land Use Map is warranted. • The subject property is located in an abandoned single-family subdivision in a heavy industrial area of Corpus Christi adjacent to Refinery Row. Ownership records with the Nueces County Appraisal District indicate the lots in the neighborhood currently are owned by several different industrial companies, including Citgo Refining and Chemicals, Flint Hills Resources and Mark West Javelina Co., LLC. It is staff's opinion the abandoned neighborhood should be rezoned and redeveloped to provide uses needed to support industry, meanwhile also establishing compatibility with existing uses. • It is staff's opinion that the proposed rezoning would not negatively impact the surrounding residential properties even though the property to be rezoned is not consistent with the Future Land Use Plan's designation of the property as a low density residential use. There are no homes in the neighborhood, which has remained empty of any redevelopment for years. • An "IL" Light Industrial District would allow uses that are compatible with the neighboring industrial users to the north and west abutting the abandoned residential subdivision. • The property to be rezoned is suitable for uses permitted by the zoning district that would be applied by the proposed amendment. Planning Commission Final Report Page 4 Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation: Approval of the change of zoning from the "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District, "ON" Office District and "RM -1" Multifamily 1 District to the "IL" Light Industrial District. Vote Results: For: Unanimous Opposed: 0 Abstained: 0 Absent: 0 Public Notification Number of Notices Mailed — 16 within 200 -foot notification area 5 outside notification area As of April 26, 2016: In Favor — 4 inside notification area — 0 outside notification area In Opposition — 0 inside notification area — 0 outside notification area Totaling 0.00% of the land within the 200 -foot notification area in opposition. Attachments: 1. Location Map (Existing Zoning & Notice Area) 2. Application 3. Public Comments Received (if any) K:\DevelopmentSvcs\SHARED\ZONING CASES\2016\0416-03 Magellan Terminals Holdings, LP\Council Documents\Report - Magellan Terminals Holdings, LP.docx CG -2 CG -1 R y7371ACCESS ACC CN -1 UP RIVER FROM 0 Ili 37 RMP IH 37 FWY UP RIVER TO 1H 37 RMP pNt% 'QD 3 M CG - a - 411111/17 800 Feer CASE: 0416-03 ZONING & NOTICE AREA RM -1 Multifamily 1 RM -2 Multifamily 2 RM -3 Multifamily 3 ON Professional Office RM -AT Multifamily AT CN -1 Neighborhood Commercial CN -2 Neighborhood Commercial CR -1 Resort Commercial CR -2 Resort Commercial CG -1 General Commercial CG -2 General Commercial CI Intensive Commercial CED Downtown Commercial CR -3 Resort Commercial FR Farm Rural H Historic Overlay BP Business Park IL Light Industrial IH Heavy Industrial POD Planned Unit Dev. Overlay RS -10 Single -Family 10 RS -6 Single -Family s RS -4.5 Single -Family 4.5 RS -TF Two -Family RS -15 Single -Family 15 RE Residential Estate RS-TH Townhouse SP Special Permit RV Recreational Vehicle Park RMH Manufactured Horne Subject Properly Owners with FQ0' buffer 0 irr favor 4 Owners Within 200' ?ivied on x Owners altache•1 ownership labia JO opposition IH,37•FVVY IH 37 ACCESS ACC N Dare Create9414/2016 Prepered_ {ryeomyM Departmenrof DeFeloMen e Ices /-" ,' -+ LOCATION MAP City of Corpus Christi /lo MDDDO/2_ Go�p�s c�,,p,�� °//90 r;�_ : � �rtx �2. `'42016 ,� i05z Development Services Dept. P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 76469-9277 (361) 826-3240 Located at 2406 Leopard Street REZONING APPLICATION Office Use Only Case No.: 0416-03 Map No.: 9s PC Hearing Date: Proj.Mgr: Hearing Location: Citv Hall. Council Chambers, 1201 Leonard Street Hearing Time: 5:30 P.M. " A MAXIMUM OF FIVE REZONINGS CASES ARE SCHEDULED PER HEARING. • INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. 1. Applicant. Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. Contact Person : Michael C. Pearson Mailing Address. One Williams Center, OTC 9 City: Tulsa, OK State OK ziP 74172 Phone. ( ) E-mail: Cell ( ) 2. Property owner(s). Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. Contact Person : Michael C. Pearson Mailing Address One Williams Center, OTC 9 City.. Tulsa State OK zip 74172 Phone ( ) E-mail: Cell ( ) 3. Subject Property Address See Attached Sheet Area of Request (SFlacres} 209, 128 sf14.801Ac Current Zoning & Use ON & RS -6, VACANT Proposed Zoning & Use IL 12 -Digit Nueces County Tax ID: See ^__ Attached _____ Subdivision Name: Country Club Place See Attached List Block: Lot(s). Legal Description if not platted: N/A 4. Submittal Requirements: Date Held 01/'19/16 ; with City Staff Steven Rhea, Ratna Pottumutho, Bill Green ❑ Early Assistance Meeting: I] Land Use Statement IF APPLICABLE: of Interest ❑R Copy of Warranty Deed ❑ Disclosure is inconsistent exhibit • Peak Hour Trip Form (if request with Future Land Use Plan) • Site Plan for PUD or Special Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Description with if property includes un -platted land (sealed by RPLS) 0 Lien Holder Authorization is not signing this form • Appointment of Agent Fomt if landowner I certify that I have provided the City of Corpus Christi with a complete application for review; that I am authorized to initiate this rezoning ��r�as or on behalf of the Property Owner(s); and the information provided is accurate. Owner Agent's Signature Appli is Signature ��r i 4 tSRCP t, 0 Owner or Agent's Printed Name Applicant's Printed Name !� 1 Office Use Only: Date RRee]ceived: 1- / _ 1 Lt7 O Received By: —Zy i --1 ADP: /OS Rezoning Fee: 1 109, . s + PUD Fee y� + Sign Fee I 0 , 0 f? = Total Fee � / 70U .7 .50 No. Signs Required 1 © $10/sign Sign Posting Date: ICIDEVELOPMENTSVCSISHARED1AND OEVELOPMENTWPPLICA110N FORMSIREZONINGI2ONING APPLICATION 2015.000 Form Revised 51112/2015 MAGELLAN TERMINALS HOLDINGS, L.P. 1, the undersigned, SUZANNE H. COSTIN, Secretary of Magellan NGL, LLC, a Delaware Iimited liability company (the "Company") and general partner of Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. (the "Partnership"), do hereby certify that Michael C. Pearson serves as Vice President of Technical Services of the Company and is authorized to execute contracts, applications for change in zoning, disclosure of interests and any other related documentation pertaining to property zoning in or near the City of Corpus Christi for and on behalf of the Company and the Partnership. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of April, 2015. Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. By: Magellan NGL, LLC, its general partner By:- - - AC01. u _ nne H. Costin Secretary (00047975.11 LOT ADDRESS TAX !axis LOT NO. 22 23 24 25 PORTION OF 26 PORTION OF 34 PORTION OF 35 36 37 38 39 40 PORTION OF 41 PORTION OF 42 PORTION OF 55 56 MAGELLAN TERMINAL HOLDINGS, LP COUNTRY CLUB PLACE REZONING DATA COUNTY TAX ID NO. 1913-0000-0220 1913-0000-0230 1913-0000-0240 1913-0000-0250 1913-0000-0260 1913-0000-0340 1913-0000-0350 1913-0000-0360 1913-0000-0370 1913-0000-0370 1913-0000-0390 1913-0000-0400 1913-0000-0410 1913-0000-0420 1913-0000-0540 1913-0000-0540 STREET ADDRESS 22 N. COUNTRY CLUB PLACE 23 N. COUNTRY CLUB PLACE 24 N. COUNTRY CLUB PLACE 25 N. COUNTRY CLUB PLACE 26 N. COUNTRY CLUB PLACE 34 N. COUNTRY CLUB PLACE 35 N. COUNTRY CLUB PLACE 36 N. COUNTRY CLUB PLACE 37 N. COUNTRY CLUB PLACE 37 N. COUNTRY CLUB PLACE 39 COUNTRY CLUB PLACE 39 COUNTRY CLUB PLACE 41 COUNTRY CLUB PLACE 42 COUNTRY CLUB PLACE 56 COUNTRY CLUB PLACE 56 COUNTRY CLUB PLACE 3/11/2016 LAND USE STATEMENT 1. State the purpose of the request and include applicable background information as to the development plan for the property, i.e., usage of property, number and square footage(s) of existing and/or proposed building(s)/unit(s), building(s)/unit(s) height, parking plans/spaces, phasing schedule of development, number of employee(s) associated with the office, business or industrial development, hours of operation, modification or demolition plans for existing structure(s), type, area and setback of signage. etc. The site is currently unused. There are two existing buildings on the entire area covered by this rezoning request. One, will be remodeled for office space. A second building, a metal one, will possibly be remodeled in the future for warehousing use. Most anticipated uses of the subject property will require light industrial (1L) zoning. 2. Identify the existing land uses adjoining the area of request: North - Petroleum Tank Farm South _ I.H. 37 R.O.W. East - Vacant West - Petroleum Tank Farm C:IUSER55TANYAR,000ADESKTOFIDAILY USE ANNIKAILAND USE STATEMENT FOR ZONING.DOC PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (PHT) FORM Det elopment Services 2406 Leopard Street, Corpus Christi, TX 78408 Phone: (361)826-3240 v.wt; ,ectexas.com A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) determination must be made prior to the submittal of any rezoning application, site plan or street closure request. The Peak Hour Traffic Generation (PHT) Form is required to be completed for developments that are projected to contain 500 or fewer weekday peak hour (A.M. or P.M.) trips (UDC Section 3.29.4). Property Address: See attached list Legal Description (Subdivision, Lot, Block): See attached list Applicant Name: Magellan Terminals Holdings, LP, Address: One Williams Center, OTC 9 Telephone: City/State/Zip: Tulsa, OK 74171 Email: michael.pearson@magellanlp.com Application Status (Select One): ❑X Rezoning ❑ Site P1an❑Street Closure Existing Land Use Tract Acres Unit of Measure Zoning Land Use I.T.E. Code A.M. Trip Rate Peak A.M. Trips P.M. Trip Rate Peak P.M. Trips 4.801 Dwelling Unit (10) RS -6 9uildings on 1 lot 210 0 77 7.7 1.02 3.6 1000 sf (3 8k) IL Warehousing 150 0 32 1.2 0.32 1.2 7.7 -.Mil Proposed Land Use Tract Acres Unit of Measure Zoning Land Use I.T.E. Code A.M. Trip Rate Peak A.M. Tnps P.M. Trip Rale Peak P.M. Tnjs 4.801 1000 sf (2.4k) IL Office 710 1 56 3 7 1.49 3.6 1000 sf (3 8k) IL Warehousing 150 0 32 1.2 0.32 1.2 Total 4.9 Total 4.8 Abutting Streets Street Name Access Proposed To Street? Pavement Width (FT) ROW Width (FT) I.H. 37 Frontage Road (N. Bound) Existing 28 56 For City Use Only El A Traffic Impact Analysis I5 required. The consultant preparing the TIA must meet with ® the City to discuss the scope and requirements of the analysis prior to beginning the TIA. A Traffic Impact Analysis is NOT required. The proposed traffic generated does not ❑ exceed the established threshold. The Traffic Impact Analysis has been waived for the following reason(s): Reviewed By: Date: Note: This completed and review cd form must accompany any subsequent application for the IDENTICAL project. CHANGES to the proposed project will require a new TIA determination to be made. Version 1 0 (01:15) cf NAME: DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every Question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". Magellan Terminals Holdings, LP STREET: One Williams Center, OTC 9 CIN: Tulsa, OK Zip: 74172 FIRM is:OCorporation @Partnership °Sole Owner °Association @Other DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name N/A Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name N/A Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name N/A Board, Commission, or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Consultant N/A CERTIFICATE I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Michael C. Pearson Title: Vice Pres Technical Services (Print Name) Signature of Certifying Person: Date://////(ro KIDEVELOPMENTSVCSISHAREOLLAND DEVELOPMENTLAPPLICATION FORMS1REZONING4DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS STATEMENT E.12.2015.DOC MURRAY BASS, JR., P.E.,R.P.L.S. NIxoN M. WELSH, P.E.,R.P.L.S. www.bass-we1sh.com e-mail: nixmw@aol.com BASS & WELSH ENGINEERING TX Registration No. F-52 Survey Registration No. 100027-00 P.O. Box 6397 Corpus Christi. TX 78466-6397 February 17, 2016 Field Note Description Rezoning 3054 S. ALAMEDA, ZIP 78404 361 882-5521-- FAX 361 882-1265 e-mail: murrayjr@aol.com Being three tracts situated in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas, comprised of lots and portions of lots in Country Club Place Subdivision, as shown on the map thereof recorded in Volume 4 at Page 3 of the Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, and being more particularly as described in the following description: Tract No. 1 Comprised of Lots 22, 23, 24, 25, and that portion of Lot 26 lying outside of the right-of-way of Interstate Highway 37; BEGINNING at a point in the west boundary of Lot 26 where it is intersected by the north right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 37 for the southwest corner of this tract; THENCE N 23°10'15" E along the west boundary of Lots 26, 25, 24, 23 and 22 a distance of 457.14 to the northwest corner of Lot 22 for the northwest corner of this tract; THENCE S 54°11"16" E along the north boundary of Lot 22, a distance of 212.70 feet to a point in the east boundary of Lot 22, said point lying in the west boundary of the former North Country Club Place Street that was closed by Ordinance No. 028963 and retained as a utility easement, said point lying on a curve to the left; THENCE along said curve to the left whose radius is 149.46 feet in a southwesterly direction, a distance of 5.86 feet; said curve having a chord bearing S 31°03'41" W with a chord length of 5.86 feet to the point of tangency of said curve; THENCE S 26°49'47" W along the east boundary of Lots 22, 23, 24 and 25, a distance of 344.04 feet to a point of intersection with the north right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 37; THENCE N 85°13'22" W along the north right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 37 along the current south boundary of Lots 25 and 26 a distance of 194.73 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING forming a tract embracing 1.812 acres. Tract No. 2 Comprised of Lots 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 and those portions of Lots 34, 35, 41 and 42 lying north of the north right- of-way line of Interstate Highway 37 in the Country Club Place Subdivision; BEGINNING at the intersection of the west boundary of Lot 34 with the north right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 37 for the southwest corner of this tract; THENCE N 26°57'01" E a distance of 312.00 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the right; THENCE along said tangent curve to the right, whose radius is 98.94 feet in a northeasterly and southeasterly direction, a distance of 124.16 feet; said curve having a chord bearing N75°30'43"E with a chord length of 116.17' to the point of tangency of said curve; EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 2 THENCE along the north line of Lots 38 and 39, S 59°40'33" E a distance of 163.00 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the right; THENCE along said tangent curve to the right whose radius is 92.58 feet in a southeasterly and southerly direction, a distance of 128.58 feet; said curve having a chord bearing S16°35'45"E with a chord length of 118.49' to the point of tangency of said curve; THENCE S 27°34'10" W along the east boundary of Lots 39, 40 and 41, and distance of 160.51 feet to a point where the east boundary of Lot 41 intersects the north right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 37; THENCE with the current south boundary of Lots 41, 42, 35 and 34 on the north boundary along the north right-of-way line of Interstate highway 37 as follows: S 58°42'55" W a distance of 17.45 feet to a point; N 84°08'19" W a distance of 80.27 feet to a point; N 86°12'26" W a distance of 238.63 feet to a point; THENCE N 52°58'18" W a distance of 26.63 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, forming a tract embracing 2.415 acres. Tract No. 3 Comprised of Lot 56 and that portion of Lot 55, lying north of the north right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 37; BEGINNING at the intersection of the west boundary of Lot 55 with the north right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 37 for the southwest corner of this tract; THENCE N 26°30'44" E along the west boundary of Lot 55 and 56 a distance of 100.68 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the right; THENCE along said tangent curve to the right, whose radius is 99.58 feet said curve having a chord bearing of N69°54'02"E with a chord length of 118.25, in a northeasterly and southeasterly direction, a distance of 126.60 feet to the point of tangency of said curve; THENCE along the north boundary of Lot 56, S 60°19'30" E a distance of 83.37 feet to a point for the northeast corner of this tract; THENCE S 26°30'44" W along the east boundary of Lot 56 and 55 a distance of 122.98 feet to its intersection with the north right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 37 for the southeast corner of this tract; THENCE N 88°51'36" W along the south boundary of Lot 55 a distance of 148.67 feet to a point for an intermediate corner of this tract; THENCE continuing along the north right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 37, N 54°40'49" W a distance of 30.50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING forming a tract embracing 0.574 acres. rray Bass, +r., R.P.L.S. Note: Basis of Bearing is State of Texas Lambert Grid, South Zone, NAD 1983. MBJ:sab 15018 -Field Note-Rezoning.doc Page 2of2 1 i ✓ 0 0 S cow 3.4 OOw el I. t:: t^ Z ;-1 n • • 1- • - ■ 0 a 0II 2280 9 C0 f FC3 g; Z V 0 Z▪ ZZ• ° J N O 0 RIG HT -OF -WAY 0 Q E o cc fit 0 X12 Qo a S M ial P. on IiiT Ce w.5 Z gS 1B 11 ig 1 C 0 0 J in 0 O I I 3 0 fi n N b A 1, t s n k 0 PP K cn e s'c O 3 In Qo• 10o O 00 AP 0i R l 1a 000 Baa 520 r � LAI V00 ILI r n W Z y� 0 F z ✓ I�zS U 1506013 Isom. Ls Si K 9 3 2 ta 2 L3 CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND 0 A K F3 h Persons with disabilities planning to attend this meeting, who may require special services, are requested to contact s s ca the Development Services Department at least 48 hours in advance at (361) 826-3240. P ar'n ingac acidades. tieri R la irtt rl[ rr 3'istir td 'unto ue re: uFeren servidos esueciates, se les ,§ipliea que den aviso 43 hora antes d la unta Ilamando al ciet�a amenke de cervi los de desanrolto at nu (3611 82fr-32,10. If you wish to address the Commission during the meeting and your English is limited, please call the Development Services Department at (361) 826-3240 at least 48 hours in advance to request an interpreter be present during the meeting. Si ustert desea dirigirse a la commission durante Is junta v su inches es timikado, favor de Hamar al deuariamento de $ervici4s die desarrollo al nL mero {361) 826-3240 al menos 48 hp -as antes de la juntapara solicitor cin irster re ke r n e Ia "unta" CITY PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Rezoning Case No. 0416-03 Magellan Terminals Holdings, LP has petitioned the City of Corpus Christi to consider a change of zoning from the "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District, "ON" Office District and "RM -1" Multifamily 1 District to the "IL" Light Industrial District, resulting in a change to the Future Land Use Map from low density residential uses to light industrial uses. The property to be rezoned is described as Lots 22-26, 34-42 and 55-56, Country Club Place, located on the north side of Interstate Highway 37, between Up River Road and Poth Lane. The Planning Commission may recommend to City Council approval or denial, or approval of an intermediate zoning classification and/or Special Permit. Approval of a change of zoning, if inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, will also have the effect of amending the Comprehensive Plan to reflect the approved zoning. The Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing for this rezoning request to discuss and formulate a recommendation to the City Council. The public hearing will be held on Wednesday. April 20, 2016, during one of the Planning Commission's regular meetings, which begins at 5:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 1201 Leopard Street. You are invited to attend this public hearing to express your views on this rezoning request. For more information, please call (361) 826-3240. TO BE ON RECORD, THIS FORM MUST BE FILLED OUT, SIGNED BY THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER(S) AND MAILED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, P. O. BOX 9277, CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78469- 9277. ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED BELOW BECOMES PUBLIC RECORD. NOTE: In accordance with the Planning Commission By -Laws, no discussion shall be held by a member or members of this Commission with an applicant or appellant concerning an application or appeal, either at home or office, or Inperson, by telephone call or by letter. Printed Name: Address: () IN FAVI REASON: t�--.( ) IN OPPOSITt APR 1 ?Oti6 DEVEL04- ; , , JtCES SPECIAL- 5U VICE'S SEE MAP ON REVEFjSE SIDE Property Owner ID: 8 I-fTE# 16-10000012 Q. City/State:IA Phone: 143- FID #'s 3, 5, 6,8 Properties owned by Magellan Terminals Holdings Case No. 0416-03 Project Manager: Dolores Wood AGENDA MEMORANDUM Public Hearing and First Reading for the City Council Meeting of May 17, 2016 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 DATE: April 26, 2016 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Daniel McGinn, Interim Director, Development Services Department DanielMc@cctexas.com (361) 826-3595 Public Hearing and First Reading for Property at 14102 Ambrosia Street CAPTION: Case No. 0316-06 Yun W. Hwang: A change of zoning from the "RM -3" Multifamily 3 District to the "RS-TH/PUD" Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Development Overlay. The property is described as Lot 1-B, Block 1, Padre Island No. 1, together with that portion of Estrada Drive (now closed), adjacent to said Lot 1-B, Block 1, Padre Island No. 1, located on the north side of Ambrosia Street between Scallop Street and Indigo Street. PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to rezone the property to allow construction of a townhouse development. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the change of zoning from "RM -3" Multifamily 3 District to the "RS-TH/PUD" Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Development Overlay subject to the following conditions: 1.) Planned Unit Development Guidelines and Master Site Plan: The Owners shall develop the Property in accordance with the Island Bay Townhomes, Padre Island No. 1 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Guidelines and Master Site Plan. The development of the Property is to consist of four townhouse units and common area amenities and shall be constructed in one phase. 2.) Dwelling Units per Acre: The density of dwelling units on the Property shall not exceed 17.4 dwelling units per acre. 3.) Building Height: The maximum height of any structure on the Property is 30 feet. 4.) Parking: The property must have a minimum of 10 standard parking spaces (9 feet wide by 18 feet long). Parking is prohibited within the private -street and pedestrian walkways. Two parking spaces within each private garage shall be made available at all times and shall not be impeded with personal storage. 5.) Setbacks and Lot Width: Minimum three-foot wide front yard setbacks shall be provided for each lot along the private street. Minimum rear yard setbacks for all lots shall be five feet. Minimum width for townhouse lots shall be 33 feet. 6.) Open Space: The Property must maintain a minimum of 18.26% open space. Any surfaces constructed within the required open space must be constructed of pervious material. 7.) Private Street Access: The two-way private access drive shall not be less than 20 feet and shall be striped to indicate "Fire Lane/No Parking." 8.) Pedestrian Access: A minimum six-foot wide sidewalk shall be constructed along one side of the private street. 9.) Time Limit: Construction of the development shall commence within 24 months from the date this modified Planned Unit Development ordinance is approved by the City Council. Vote Results: For: 7 Against: 2 Absent: 0 BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: As detailed in the attached report, the applicant is requesting a rezoning from "RM -3" Multifamily 3 District to the "RS-TH" Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Development Overlay to allow construction of a townhouse development. The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Mustang Padre Island Area Development Plan (ADP). This PUD utilizes decreased lot sizes, decreased front yards, decreased open space requirement and, decreased street width, while reducing building height, and meeting the rear yard and parking requirements. Staff finds that the proposed deviations are acceptable. The rezoning is compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and to the character of the surrounding area. The property to be rezoned is suitable for uses permitted by the zoning district that would be applied by the rezoning and would not have a negative impact on the surrounding neighborhood. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Modify the conditions of the Planned Unit Development; 2. Deny the request. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not Applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Mustang Padre Island Area Development Plan (ADP). The proposed rezoning to the "RS-TH/PUD" Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Overlay is consistent with the Mustang Padre Island Area Development Plan but not consistent with the Future Land Use Map designation of the property as low density residential. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal and Planning Commission FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital • •Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015- 2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Presentation - Aerial Map Planning Commission Final Report Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), upon application by Yun W. Hwang ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to Lot 1-B, Block 1, Padre Island No. 1, together with that portion of Estrada Drive (now closed), adjacent to said Lot 1-B, Block 1, Padre Island No. 1, from the "RM -3" Multifamily 3 District to the "RS-TH/PUD" Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Development Overlay, amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its final report and recommendation regarding the application of Yun W. Hwang ("Owner"), for an amendment to the City of Corpus Christi's Unified Development Code ("UDC") and corresponding UDC Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, April 6, 2016, and again on Wednesday, April 20, 2016, during a meeting of the Planning Commission when the Planning Commission recommended approval of the change of zoning from the "RM -3" Multifamily 3 District to the "RS-TH/PUD" Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Development Overlay, and on Tuesday, May 17, 2016, during a meeting of the City Council, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve the public health, necessity, convenience and general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Upon application by Yun W. Hwang ("Owner"), the Unified Development Code ("UDC") of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas ("City"), is amended by changing the zoning on Lot 1-B, Block 1, Padre Island No. 1, together with that portion of Estrada Drive (now closed), adjacent to said Lot 1-B, Block 1, Padre Island No. 1, located on the north side of Ambrosia Street between Scallop Street and Indigo Street (the "Property"), from the "RM -3" Multifamily 3 District to the "RS-TH/PUD" Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Development Overlay (Zoning Map No.029028), as shown in Exhibits "A" and "B". Exhibit A, which is a map of the Property, and Exhibit B, which is the Island Bay Townhomes, Padre Island No. 1 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Guidelines for the Property, are attached to and incorporated in this ordinance by reference as if fully set out herein in their entireties. SECTION 2. The Special Permit granted in Section 1 of this ordinance is subject to the Owner meeting the requirements of Exhibit B and the following conditions: 1. Planned Unit Development Guidelines and Master Site Plan: The Owners shall develop the Property in accordance with the Island Bay Townhomes, Padre Island No. 1 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Guidelines and Master Site Plan. The development of the Property is to consist of four townhouse units and common area amenities and shall be constructed in one phase. 2. Dwelling Units per Acre: The density of dwelling units on the Property shall not exceed 17.4 dwelling units per acre. 3. Building Height: The maximum height of any structure on the Property is 30 feet. 4. Parking: The property must have a minimum of 10 standard parking spaces (9 feet wide by 18 feet long). Parking is prohibited within the private -street and pedestrian walkways. Two parking spaces within each private garage shall be made available at all times and shall not be impeded with personal storage. 5. Setbacks and Lot Width: Minimum 3 -foot wide front yard setbacks shall be provided for each lot along the private street. Minimum rear yard setbacks for all lots shall be five feet. Minimum width for townhouse lots shall be 33 feet. 6. Open Space: The Property must maintain a minimum of 18.26% open space. Any surfaces constructed within the required open space must be constructed of pervious material. 7. Private Street Access: The two-way private access drive shall not be less than 20 feet and shall be striped to indicate "Fire Lane/No Parking." 8. Pedestrian Access: A minimum six-foot wide sidewalk shall be constructed along one side of the private street. 9. Time Limit: Construction of the development shall commence within 24 months from the date this modified Planned Unit Development ordinance is approved by the City Council. SECTION 3. The official UDC Zoning Map of the City is amended to reflect changes made to the UDC by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 4. The UDC and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City, made effective July 1, 2011, and as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance, both remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. The City's Future Land Use Map, an element of the Comprehensive Plan, is amended to designate the Property for medium density residential land uses. SECTION 6. All ordinances or parts of ordinances specifically pertaining to the zoning of the Property and that are in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 7. Publication shall be made in the City's official publication as required by the City's Charter. Page 2 of 3 The foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre The foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 20 ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor Ordinance - Island Bay Townhomes Page 3 of 3 N SUBJEC PROPERTY O 800 Feet FR I0 Date Created33/21/2016 Pre,pled By: JeremyM Dem pante efiY•6f Develoffment Services o CASE: 0316-06 SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH ZONING Subject Property RM -1 Multifamily 1 RM -2 Multifamily 2 RM -3 Multifamily 3 ON Professional Office RM -AT Multifamily AT CN -1 Neighborhood Commercial CN -2 Neighborhood Commercial CR -1 CR -2 CG -1 CG -2 CI CBD CR -3 FR H BP Resort Commercial Resort Commercial General Commercial General Commercial Intensive Commercial Downtown Commercial Resort Commercial Farm Rural Historic Overlay Business Park IL Light Industrial IH Heavy Industrial PUD Planned Unit Dev. Overlay RS -10 Single -Family 10 RS -6 Single -Family 6 RS -4.5 Single -Family 4.5 RS -TF Two -Family RS -15 Single -Family 15 RE Residential Estate RS-TH Townhouse SP Special Permit RV Recreational Vehicle Park RMH Manufactured Home No SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION MAP ilk City of Corpus Christi Exhibit A Planned Unit Development for: Island Bay Townhomes, Padre Island No. 1 Padre Island, Corpus Christi, Texas Mr. Yun-wone Hwang, Owner Submitted By: TexasGeoTech Engineering & Land Surveying, Inc. TexasGeoTech ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING, INC. Exhibit B Table of Contents Location Map 2 General Information 3 Current/Adjacent/Proposed Zoning 4 Property Description 5 Deviations Table for Island Bay Townhomes P.U.D. 6 Development Guidelines for island Bay Townhomes P.U.D. 7 Lot Layout Open Space Layout Vehicular and Pedestrian Access Master Site Plan, Island Bay Townhomes P.U.D. Location Map 8 9 10-11 12 2 Exhibit B General Information The proposed Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) falls within the area of the City included in the Mustang -Padre Island Area Development Plan. Existing and future land uses within the area include undeveloped properties, single family and two family residential use, townhouse, condominium, and apartment uses, and various neighborhood and medium density commercial uses. Development of most property within the area must meet the "Island Overlay" building standards in addition to the the City's standard development codes. The Island Bay Townhomes Planned Unit Development provides for the platting and development of Lot 1-B, Block 1 of the Padre Island No. 1 Subdivision and the adjoining tract of land resulting from the closing of a section of Estrada Drive. The total area of the property is approximately 10,056 square feet. The P.U.D. includes four adjoining townhome units or lots, resulting in a dwelling unit density of approximately 17.4 units per acre. Two common area lots are also included to allow for green space, and another lot is dedicated as a private vehicular and pedestrian access easement to the proposed townhome units. The access easement also serves as a utility easement for water and wastewater service to the development. The townhome units proposed are two story, with a portion of each of the first floor areas designed as a two car garage. The remaining portion of the first floor and the second floor are designed as living space. The townhome units as designed provide for an average of about 1,100 square feet of enclosed space per floor. 3 Exhibit B Current/Adjacent/Proposed Zoning The property included within the proposed P.U.D. is currently zoned for residential two family use (RM -3). Properties surrounding the proposed P.U.D. are currently zoned two family residential (RS -TF) to the west, single family residential (RS -6) to the south, townhome planned unit development (RS-TH/PUD) to the east, and general business district (CR -2) to the north. Re -zoning to RS-TH/PUD will result in a use type and density comparable to the adjoining properties to the east and west, and will provide for a transitional use between the single family residential use to the south and the commercial use to the north. 4 Exhibit B Property Description Lot 1-B, Block 1. Padre island No. 1, as shown on the Map or Plat recorded in Volume 13, Pages 1-8, Map Records Nueces County Texas, together with that portion of Estrada Drive (now closed) adjacent to said Lot 1-B by Commissioner's Court Minutes for September 10th, 1968 recorded Volume 15, Page 376, Commissioners records Nueces County Texas. 5 Exhibit B Deviations Table for Island Bay Townhomes P.U.D. Standard UDC Requirement (Section 4.4.3.A) Island Bay Townhomes Min Site Area (sq.ft.) 20,000 10,053.94 Min. Area per dwelling, Front Access (sq.ft.) 2,600 1,990 Min. Dwelling Unit Width (ft.) Front Access 26 33 Min. Yard (ft.) Street 10 3' Kingfish Drive Min. Yard (ft.) Side (single) 0 0 Min. Yard (ft.) Side (total) 0 0 Min. Yard (ft.) Rear 5 5 Min. Building Separation (ft.) 10 0 Min. Open Space 30% 18.26 % ** Max. Height (ft.) 45 30 Parking Requirement (7.2.2.6) 2.2 spaces/unit 2 per unit + 2 guest (10 total) Sidewalks (8.2.1.6) 4' on both sides of street 6' on one side of street Unit Density (unit/acres) N/A 17.4 Overnight Accomodation N/A No Building Site may be leased or rented for less than 30 days. Per Article IX, Section 11.12 of the Declarction of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Island Bay Townhomes Street Section Width (8.2.1.6) 28' 20' Open space area deficiency has been compensated for by including common area amenities such as the designated dog run area, permanent park bench, and permanent picnic table, as well as by providing higher landscaping value to the common areas than that required for the development. 6 Development Guidelines for the Island Bay Townhomes P.U.D. Residential Lots 1R through 4R, Block 1 1. Usage 2. Lot size 3. Lot width 4. Front yard requirement Single Family Residential, Townhome Minimum 1,270 s.f. Maximum 1,410 s.f. Minimum 33.17 ft. Maximum 33.17 ft. Kingfish Dr. 3 ft. 5. Rear yard requirement 5 ft. 6. Building height 2 stories required and maximum, 30 ft. roof peak 7. Building area (both floors combined) Minimum 1,990 s.f. Maximum 2,200 s.f. S. Parking requirements 2 parking spaces per unit, plus 2 common guest spaces 9. Improvements All construction is to meet Island Overlay requirements. structures and appurtenances shall not extend beyond applicable yard, easement, or lot lines. 10. Maintenance Maintenance, repair, and replacement of all improvements within the residential lots 1R, 2R, 3R, and 4R shall be the responsibility of the respective lot owner. Common Area Lots 6R and 7R, Block 1 1. Use 2. Maintenance Private Access and Utility Easement 1. Use 2. Parking 3. Maintenance Non -buildable Tots. Dedicated for use as green areas with amenities such as picnic tables, etc. Use of area immediately adjacent to Lot 4 as a dog run is permissible with approval of Home Owner's Association Maintenance, repair, and replacement of any Improvements or amenities within the common areas shall be the responsibility of the Horne Owner's Association. Non -buildable lot. Areas to be used for private vehicular access drive, guest parking, pedestrian access sidewalk, and utility services. Parking to be allowed in designated spaces only. Guest parking is to be clearly marked. Maintenance, repair, and replacement of improvements within the access and utility easements shall be the responsibility of the Home Owner's Association. 7 Exhibit B Lot Layout for Island Bay Townhomes P.U.D. Legend: Lot 1—Townhome Unit Lot 2 — Townhome Unit Lot 3 — Townhome Unit Lot 4 — Townhome Unit Lot 5 — Access and Utility Easement Lot 6 — Common Area Lot 7 — Common Area 8 Exhibit B Open Space Layout for Island Bay Townhomes P.U.D. Open Space Calculation: Total Property Area = 10,053.94 sq. ft. Lot 6 = 906.81 Sq. Ft. Lot 7 = 167.44 Sq. Ft. Rear Yards = 662.14 Sq. Ft. Front Yards = 99.51 Sq. Ft. Total Open Space = 1,835.90 sq. ft. = 18.26 % 9 Exhibit B Vehicular, Emergency Vehical and Pedestrian Acccess for Island Bay Townhomes P.U.D. Vehicular, Emergency Vehical and pedestrian access for the four townhome lots and adjoining common space lots will be provided by a 20 foot width private access drive and adjoining 6 foot width sidewalk. The private access drive is less than 150 feet in length, and connects directly to Ambrosia Street. The entrance to the development will not be gated. Parking within the development will be limited to the garage spaces included within each townhome unit, as well as the 2 exterior common guest parking spaces. Typical Cross Section Y Y w Q < Iw 1 m m iz i J ww I,- CC i Y II -- W I w EL 1 CC I ACCESS & UTILITY o — Ice ID_ EASEMENT v> �Iw 6 20' PRIVATE DRIVE Z } 0 cze 20, 0' ENCLOSED GARAGE 7--2ROLL CURE 2% SLOPE 6' CONCRETE PAVEMENT W/#4 REBAR AT 12' O.CE.V. 2% SLOPE EDGE ❑F SI DEALK BUILDING LINE \\-6' CDNC. SIDEWALK 6' COMPACTED SUDGRADE (95% MDDIEIED PROCTOR DENSITY) CROSS SECTION NOT TO SCALE 10 Exhibit B Parking Requirements NOTE: REQUIRED SPACES = 2.2 J LOT = 8.8 PROVIDED SPACES DENOTED O = 8 SPACES 02 = 2 SPACES TOTAL = 10 SPACES • i•''.. • • of, ...•i . • ••• . ' •• t • •, •�P' A* '/'• 3 'e1 f- . , is .4 • a , • • I.•• 1 .,• ,•' 4,4/ s r •- '�', + CYT ,e'" aelu", f"�1 s/% ' 4 a 444 •i. "fir.. • •'•r`• ©'Q�'P I� • • • • • • 20' PRIVATE - --- ACCESS DRIVE (SEE CROSS SECTION) 6' SIDEWALK —` • • • • f . 1 s' • • • •• • 18'—O" 20'-0" • GUEST PARKING 18`--0` GARAGE PARKING 11 Exhibit B Aerial Overview Vicinity Map 1 Aerial Master Site Plan • M" 20' PRIVATE ACCESS DRIVE (SEE CROSS SECTION) 3 Conditions 1. Planned Unit Development Guidelines and Master Site Plan: • Stipulate how development will occur • Four townhouse units and common area amenities • Constructed in one phase. 2. Dwelling Units per Acre: Maximum density of 17.4 dwelling units per acre. 3. Building Height: 30 feet. Conditions 4. Parking: • 10 standard parking spaces. • Parking is prohibited along the private -street. • Two parking spaces within each private garage. 5. Setbacks and Lot Width: • Minimum 3 -foot wide front yards • Minimum 5 -foot rear yards • Minimum 33 -foot lot widths Conditions 6. Open Space: • 18.26% minimum. • Pervious material required within open space. 7. Private Street Access: • 20 -foot width • Striped to indicate "Fire Lane/No Parking" 8. Pedestrian Access: • Six-foot wide sidewalk along one side of the private street Conditions 9. Time Limit: 24 months PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL REPORT Case No. 0316-06 HTE No. 15-10000057 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 20, 2016 (Tabled from April 6, 2016) Applicant & Legal Description Applicant/Owner: Yun-W. Hwang Representative: Robert Cardenas Legal Description/Location: Lot 1-B, Block 1, Padre Island No. 1, together with that portion of Estrada Drive (now closed), adjacent to said Lot 1-B, Block 1, Padre Island No. 1, located on the north side of Ambrosia Street between Scallop Street and Indigo Street. Zoning Request From: "RM -3" Multifamily 3 District To: "RS-TH/PUD" Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Development Overlay Area: 0.23 acres Purpose of Request: To allow construction of a townhouse development. Existing Zoning and Land Uses Existing Zoning District Existing Land Use Future Land Use Site "RM -3" Multifamily 3 Vacant Low Density Residential North "CR-2/IO" Resort Commercial with an Island Overlay Commercial and Vacant Tourist South "RS -6" Single -Family 6 Low Density Residential and Vacant Low Density Residential East "RS-TH/PUD" Townhouse with a Planned Unit Development Overlay Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential West "RS -TF" Two -Family Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential ADP, Map & Violations Area Development Plan: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Mustang -Padre Island Area Development Plan and is planned for low density uses. The proposed rezoning to the "RS-TH/PUD" Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Overlay is not consistent with the adopted Future Land Use Map, but consistent with the Mustang -Padre Island Area Development Plan. Map No.: 029028 Zoning Violations: None Planning Commission Final Report Page 2 Transportation Transportation and Circulation: The subject property has approximately 60 feet of street frontage along Ambrosia Street, which is a Local Residential street. Street Urban Transportation Plan Type Proposed Section Existing Section Traffic Volume Ambrosia Street Local Residential 50' ROW 28' paved 55' ROW 25' paved N/A Staff Summary: Requested Zoning: The applicant is requesting a rezoning from the "RM -3" Multifamily 3 District to the "RS-TH" Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Development Overlay to allow construction of a townhouse development. Development Plan: The applicant is proposing to develop four adjoining townhome units resulting in a dwelling unit density of approximately 17.4 units per acre. Two common area lots are included for open space. The development is proposed to be served by an access easement which will also include utility easements to serve the proposed development. The townhome units are proposed to be two-story with a portion of each of the first floor areas designed as a two -car garage. Each townhome unit will provide for an average of approximately 1,100 square feet of living space per story. Minimum Dimensions "RS-TH" District Standards Proposed PUD Deviation Lot Area 20,000 SF 10,053.94 SF Yes Minimum Lot Width 26 33 ft. No Front Yard 10 ft. 3 ft. Yes Side Yard 0 ft. 0 ft. No Rear Yard 5 ft. 5 ft. No Building Separation 10 ft. N/A No Open Space 30% 18.26% Yes Maximum Height 45 ft. 30 ft. No Paved Street Width 28 ft. 20 ft. Yes Curb Type 6 -in. curb & gutter None Yes Parking Requirement 1.5/ unit(1 bedroom) 2/ unit (2 bedroom) 1/5 units (guests) 1.5/ unit(1 bedroom) 2/ unit (2 bedroom) 1/5 units (guests) No Sidewalks 5 ft. on both sides or 6 ft. on both sides of private street 6 ft. on one side of private street No Planning Commission Final Staff Report Page 3 Existing Land Uses & Zoning: The subject property is zoned "RM -3" Multifamily 3 and is vacant land. North of the property is zoned "CR-2/IO" Resort Commercial with an Island Overlay and consists of commercial uses and vacant land. South is zoned "RS - 6" Single -Family and consists of low density residential uses and vacant land. The east and west properties consist of medium density residential uses and are zoned "RS -TF" Two -Family to the west and "RS-TH/PUD" to the east. AICUZ: The subject property is not located in one of the Navy's Air Installation Compatibility Use Zones (AICUZ). Plat Status: The subject property must be replatted in accordance with the PUD. Comprehensive Plan & Area Development Plan Consistency: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Mustang Padre Island Area Development Plan (ADP). The proposed rezoning to the "RS-TH/PUD" Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Overlay is consistent with the Mustang Padre Island Area Development Plan but not consistent with the Future Land Use Map designation of the property as low density residential. Additionally, the following are pertinent elements of the Comprehensive Plan and should be considered: • Planned Unit Development and other creative land planning techniques should be encouraged (Residential Policy Statement K). • Tourist -oriented business and development will continue to be encouraged and promoted by all agencies of the City as illustrated on the Future Land Use Map. This includes commercial ventures, condominiums and resorts, fishing and outdoor recreation facilities, and recreational vehicle parks (Policy Statement B.2). • The City will continue to protect residential neighborhoods from encroachment of non-residential uses unless the negative effects of the non-residential uses are eliminated or significantly mitigated (Policy Statement B.13). Department Comments: • The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Review Criteria for a PUD rezoning set forth in the UDC. • The development is in harmony with the character of the surrounding area. • The development offers an alternative in housing types. • The development as proposed is orderly with respect to the area and community. • The development has a plan for the separation of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. • The development will include the timely provision of utilities, facilities and services. • The proposed rezoning is compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby properties and to the character of the surrounding area. This rezoning does not have a negative impact upon the surrounding neighborhood. • The subject property is suitable for the uses proposed by this rezoning. • This PUD utilizes decreased lot sizes, decreased front yards, decreased open space requirement and, decreased street width, while reducing building height, and meeting the rear yard and parking requirements. Planning Commission Final Report Page 4 • Infill development should be encouraged at this site. PUDs allow flexibility for attractive, efficient design and can often reduce infrastructure installation and maintenance costs to the city. PUDs can encourage development on difficult sites. • Staff finds that the proposed deviations are acceptable. • The subject property is located in a "Vinyl Not Allowed" area. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation: Approval of the change of zoning from "RM -3" Multifamily 3 District to the "RS-TH/PUD" Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Development Overlay with the following conditions: 1. Planned Unit Development Guidelines and Master Site Plan: The Owners shall develop the Property in accordance with the Island Bay Townhomes, Padre Island No. 1 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Guidelines and Master Site Plan. The development of the Property is to consist of four townhouse units and common area amenities and shall be constructed in one phase. 2. Dwelling Units per Acre: The density of dwelling units on the Property shall not exceed 17.4 dwelling units per acre. 3. Building Height: The maximum height of any structure on the Property is 30 feet. 4. Parking: The property must have a minimum of 10 standard parking spaces (9 feet wide by 18 feet long). Parking is prohibited within the private -street and pedestrian walkways. Two parking spaces within each private garage shall be made available at all times and shall not be impeded with personal storage. 5. Setbacks and Lot Width: Minimum 3 -foot wide front yard setbacks shall be provided for each lot along the private street. Minimum rear yard setbacks for all lots shall be five feet. Minimum width for townhouse lots shall be 33 feet. 6. Open Space: The Property must maintain a minimum of 18.26% open space. Any surfaces constructed within the required open space must be constructed of pervious material. 7. Private Street Access: The two-way private access drive shall not be less than 20 feet and shall be striped to indicate "Fire Lane/No Parking." 8. Pedestrian Access: A minimum six-foot wide sidewalk shall be constructed along one side of the private street. 9. Time Limit: Construction of the development shall commence within 24 months from the date this modified Planned Unit Development ordinance is approved by the City Council. Planning Commission Final Staff Report Page 5 Vote Results: For: 7 Against: 2 Absent: 0 Public Notification Number of Notices Mailed — 26 within 200 -foot notification area 5 outside notification area As of April 26, 2016: In Favor — 2 inside notification area — 0 outside notification area In Opposition — 4 inside notification area — 6 outside notification area via petition Totaling 9.57% of the land within the 200 -foot notification area in opposition. Attachments: 1. Location Map (Existing Zoning & Notice Area) 2. Island Bay Townhomes, Padre Island No. 1 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Guidelines and Master Site Plan. 3. Application 4. Public Comments Received (if any) N SUBJEC PROPERTY O 800 Feet FR I0 Date Created33/21/2016 Pre,pled By: JeremyM Dem pante efiY•6f Develoffment Services o CASE: 0316-06 SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH ZONING Subject Property RM -1 Multifamily 1 RM -2 Multifamily 2 RM -3 Multifamily 3 ON Professional Office RM -AT Multifamily AT CN -1 Neighborhood Commercial CN -2 Neighborhood Commercial CR -1 CR -2 CG -1 CG -2 CI CBD CR -3 FR H BP Resort Commercial Resort Commercial General Commercial General Commercial Intensive Commercial Downtown Commercial Resort Commercial Farm Rural Historic Overlay Business Park IL Light Industrial IH Heavy Industrial PUD Planned Unit Dev. Overlay RS -10 Single -Family 10 RS -6 Single -Family 6 RS -4.5 Single -Family 4.5 RS -TF Two -Family RS -15 Single -Family 15 RE Residential Estate RS-TH Townhouse SP Special Permit RV Recreational Vehicle Park RMH Manufactured Home No SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION MAP ilk City of Corpus Christi Planned Unit Development for: Island Bay Townhomes, Padre Island No. 1 Padre Island, Corpus Christi, Texas Mr. Yun-wone Hwang, Owner Submitted By: TexasGeoTech Engineering & Land Surveying, Inc. TexasGeoTech ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING, INC. Table of Contents Location Map 2 General Information 3 Current/Adjacent/Proposed Zoning 4 Property Description 5 Deviations Table for Island Bay Townhomes P.U.D. 6 Development Guidelines for island Bay Townhomes P.U.D. 7 Lot Layout Open Space Layout Vehicular and Pedestrian Access Master Site Plan, Island Bay Townhomes P.U.D. Location Map 8 9 10-11 12 2 General Information The proposed Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) falls within the area of the City included in the Mustang -Padre Island Area Development Plan. Existing and future land uses within the area include undeveloped properties, single family and two family residential use, townhouse, condominium, and apartment uses, and various neighborhood and medium density commercial uses. Development of most property within the area must meet the "Island Overlay" building standards in addition to the the City's standard development codes. The Island Bay Townhomes Planned Unit Development provides for the platting and development of Lot 1-B, Block 1 of the Padre Island No. 1 Subdivision and the adjoining tract of land resulting from the closing of a section of Estrada Drive. The total area of the property is approximately 10,056 square feet. The P.U.D. includes four adjoining townhome units or lots, resulting in a dwelling unit density of approximately 17.4 units per acre. Two common area lots are also included to allow for green space, and another lot is dedicated as a private vehicular and pedestrian access easement to the proposed townhome units. The access easement also serves as a utility easement for water and wastewater service to the development. The townhome units proposed are two story, with a portion of each of the first floor areas designed as a two car garage. The remaining portion of the first floor and the second floor are designed as living space. The townhome units as designed provide for an average of about 1,100 square feet of enclosed space per floor. 3 Current/Adjacent/Proposed Zoning The property included within the proposed P.U.D. is currently zoned for residential two family use (RM -3). Properties surrounding the proposed P.U.D. are currently zoned two family residential (RS -TF) to the west, single family residential (RS -6) to the south, townhome planned unit development (RS-TH/PUD) to the east, and general business district (CR -2) to the north. Re -zoning to RS-TH/PUD will result in a use type and density comparable to the adjoining properties to the east and west, and will provide for a transitional use between the single family residential use to the south and the commercial use to the north. 4 Property Description Lot 1-B, Block 1. Padre island No. 1, as shown on the Map or Plat recorded in Volume 13, Pages 1-8, Map Records Nueces County Texas, together with that portion of Estrada Drive (now closed) adjacent to said Lot 1-B by Commissioner's Court Minutes for September 10th, 1968 recorded Volume 15, Page 376, Commissioners records Nueces County Texas. 5 Deviations Table for Island Bay Townhomes P.U.D. Standard UDC Requirement (Section 4.4.3.A) Island Bay Townhomes Min Site Area (sq.ft.) 20,000 10,053.94 Min. Area per dwelling, Front Access (sq.ft.) 2,600 1,990 Min. Dwelling Unit Width (ft.) Front Access 26 33 Min. Yard (ft.) Street 10 3' Kingfish Drive Min. Yard (ft.) Side (single) 0 0 Min. Yard (ft.) Side (total) 0 0 Min. Yard (ft.) Rear 5 5 Min. Building Separation (ft.) 10 0 Min. Open Space 30% 18.26 % ** Max. Height (ft.) 45 30 Parking Requirement (7.2.2.6) 2.2 spaces/unit 2 per unit + 2 guest (10 total) Sidewalks (8.2.1.6) 4' on both sides of street 6' on one side of street Unit Density (unit/acres) N/A 17.4 Overnight Accomodation N/A No Building Site may be leased or rented for less than 30 days. Per Article IX, Section 11.12 of the Declarction of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Island Bay Townhomes Street Section Width (8.2.1.6) 28' 20' Open space area deficiency has been compensated for by including common area amenities such as the designated dog run area, permanent park bench, and permanent picnic table, as well as by providing higher landscaping value to the common areas than that required for the development. 6 Development Guidelines for the Island Bay Townhomes P.U.D. Residential Lots 1R through 4R, Block 1 1. Usage 2. Lot size 3. Lot width 4. Front yard requirement Single Family Residential, Townhome Minimum 1,270 s.f. Maximum 1,410 s.f. Minimum 33.17 ft. Maximum 33.17 ft. Kingfish Dr. 3 ft. 5. Rear yard requirement 5 ft. 6. Building height 2 stories required and maximum, 30 ft. roof peak 7. Building area (both floors combined) Minimum 1,990 s.f. Maximum 2,200 s.f. S. Parking requirements 2 parking spaces per unit, plus 2 common guest spaces 9. Improvements All construction is to meet Island Overlay requirements. structures and appurtenances shall not extend beyond applicable yard, easement, or lot lines. 10. Maintenance Maintenance, repair, and replacement of all improvements within the residential lots 1R, 2R, 3R, and 4R shall be the responsibility of the respective lot owner. Common Area Lots 6R and 7R, Block 1 1. Use 2. Maintenance Private Access and Utility Easement 1. Use 2. Parking 3. Maintenance Non -buildable Tots. Dedicated for use as green areas with amenities such as picnic tables, etc. Use of area immediately adjacent to Lot 4 as a dog run is permissible with approval of Home Owner's Association Maintenance, repair, and replacement of any Improvements or amenities within the common areas shall be the responsibility of the Horne Owner's Association. Non -buildable lot. Areas to be used for private vehicular access drive, guest parking, pedestrian access sidewalk, and utility services. Parking to be allowed in designated spaces only. Guest parking is to be clearly marked. Maintenance, repair, and replacement of improvements within the access and utility easements shall be the responsibility of the Home Owner's Association. 7 Lot Layout for Island Bay Townhomes P.U.D. Legend: Lot 1—Townhome Unit Lot 2 — Townhome Unit Lot 3 — Townhome Unit Lot 4 — Townhome Unit Lot 5 — Access and Utility Easement Lot 6 — Common Area Lot 7 — Common Area 8 Open Space Layout for Island Bay Townhomes P.U.D. Open Space Calculation: Total Property Area = 10,053.94 sq. ft. Lot 6 = 906.81 Sq. Ft. Lot 7 = 167.44 Sq. Ft. Rear Yards = 662.14 Sq. Ft. Front Yards = 99.51 Sq. Ft. Total Open Space = 1,835.90 sq. ft. = 18.26 % 9 Vehicular, Emergency Vehical and Pedestrian Acccess for Island Bay Townhomes P.U.D. Vehicular, Emergency Vehical and pedestrian access for the four townhome lots and adjoining common space lots will be provided by a 20 foot width private access drive and adjoining 6 foot width sidewalk. The private access drive is less than 150 feet in length, and connects directly to Ambrosia Street. The entrance to the development will not be gated. Parking within the development will be limited to the garage spaces included within each townhome unit, as well as the 2 exterior common guest parking spaces. Typical Cross Section Y Y wI Q < IW i CO m iz i jJ B CC i Y ICC W I w EL 1 CC I ACCESS & UTILITY o — Ice ID_ EASEMENT v> �I0_ 6 20' PRIVATE DRIVE Z } 0 cze 20, Cr ENCLOSED GARAGE 7--2ROLL CURE 2% SLOPE 6' CONCRETE PAVEMENT W/#4 REBAR ET 12' O.CE.W. 2% SLOPE EDGE ❑F SI DEALK BUILDING LINE \\-6' CDNC. SIDEWALK 6' COMPACTED SUDGRADE (95% MDDIEIED PROCTOR DENSITY) CROSS SECTION NUT TO SCALE 10 Parking Requirements NOTE: REQUIRED SPACES = 2.2 J LOT = 8.8 PROVIDED SPACES DENOTED = 8 SPACES 02 = 2 SPACES TOTAL = 10 SPACES 'L" . ` • • t if mss. •. i > =i till • . ' it • • 1 • • A \' - • %: (4- 20` PRIVATE — ----- 1 ACCESS DRIVE (SEE CROSS SECTION) • • r • • • • • I f r � gib • • • • 6' SIDEWALK —` s • •a • 18'—O" r 20'-0" 9'— GUEST PARKING 18`--0` 11 GARAGE PARKING Development Services Dept. P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 (361) 826-3240 Located at 2406 Leopard Street REZONING APPLICATION O Case No.: 0316-06 Map No.: 029028 PC Hearing Date: 4/6/16 Proj.Mgr: Hearing Location: Citv Half, Council Chambers, 1201 Leopard Street Hearing Time: 5:30 p.m. "` A MAXIMUM OF FIVE REZONINGS CASES ARE SCHEDULED PER HEARING. * INCOfvMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. Applicant: *YU •-UPO E` ` J a/ Mailing Address: r .5-UZr T # Io 3 City: ' E-mail: Contact Person : t , N-1AI6iL L n W ANC, jbJr737-c2//p9 Phone: (3 6/ ) - cit ofd-- ea: Rd-CeII: (36) ) PropertyOwner(s): U -WON Z I 1117 a_ Mailing Address: IS ' SST 4V./ 03 City: CO rru 4 c...A State:75z ZIP: V/.}/� Phone: (> 6( '-99)/ E-mail: / Cell: ( ) Contact Person : yl m 1 Subject Property Address: j tit to Z. /1- rn ,, 2 /)4, ; >4 S Area of Request (SF/acres):. Z , AC /j u c 5 6 Current Zoning & Use: lm 3 Proposed Zoning & Use: - `jam PO 15 12 -Digit Nueces County Tax ID: C� 1 a s- 0 is 0 1- G I Z j / Subdivision Name: Pio h kiLL2 s Kt o 1 Legal Description if not platted: \2 L, 1? -3 / 174 Z R 11 Block: l Lot(s): I 5 . Submittal Requirements: agariy Assistance Meeting: Date Held in -9- f ; with City Staff S rang 04 f -2_ (-1.a A at -and Use Statement OT3isclosure of Interest aCopy of Warranty Deed IF APPLICABLE: I PFAeak Hour Trip Form (if request is inconsistent with Future Land Use Plan) ❑ Site Plan for PUD or Special Permit ❑ M t s ttnds Description with exhibit if property includes un -platted land (sealed by RPLS)klfr] Lien Holder Authorization [KAppointinent of Agent Form if landowner is not signing this form certify that I have provided the City of Corpus Christi with a complete application for review; that I am authorized to initiate this rezoning as If of the Property Owner(s); and the inforn . it` ,, vided is accurate Ownegent's Signature U--k?0NE HI4N�� Owner or Agent's Printed Name Applic. rgnature Applica 'ssPrinfed Nam'° V G 129 Office Use Only: Date Received: 9/18/15 Received By: ADP: MPI Rezoning Fee: 1 107 51) + PUD Fee 542.00 + Sign Fee 10.00 = Total Fee 1659.50 No. Signs Required 1 @ $10/sign Sign Posting Date: K:IDEVELOFrdET T SVCS : HSREDILAND DEVELOPMENTAPFtICATION FOPMS\R;.ZONSNCZONING APPLICATION 2015.D OC Form Revised 5/12,2015 APPOINTMENT OF AGENT As owner of the subject property, I hereby appoint the person designated below to act for me, as my agent in this request. Name of Agent: Tt=x41SG-7 ,5 /. Gz,'c>iNEE12/1.4 67 Lr►,ai SvRvg.Y/N• Mailing Address: 52,-2.,-7 5. ,S-rA. Pc..rr Sr. . Su g• [3 : City: Co Aro a. &re, ' State: Ilk Zip: SFr I Home Phone: ( ) Business Phone: ( ;t,) ) 417.--060E1 Cell: (; r,) ) U-,1, - 34 ct 1 I acknowledge and affirm that I will be legally bound by the words and acts of my agent, and by my signature below, I fully authorize my agent to: Be the point of contact between myself and the City of Corpus Christi; make legally binding representations of fact and commitments of every kind on my behalf; grant legally binding waivers of rights and releases of liabilities of every kind on my behalf; consent to legally binding modifications; conditions, and exceptions on my behalf; and, to execute documents on my behalf which are legally binding on inc. I understand that the City of Corpus Christi will deal only with a fully authorized agent, At any time it should appear that my agent has less than full authority to act, then the application may be suspended and I will have to personally participate in the disposition of the application. I understand that all communications related to this application are part of an official proceeding of City government and, that the City will rely upon statements made by my agent. Therefore, I agree to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Corpus Christi, its officers, agents, employees, and third parties who act in reliance upon my agent's words and actions from ail damages, attorney fees, interest and costs arising from this matter. If my property is owned by a corporation, partnership, venture, or other legal entity, then I certify that I have the legal author' to make this binding appointment on behalf of the entity, and every reference herein to "I", "my", or " e" s a referen.. • the entity. *Signature of Agent: Printed/Typed Name of A z ent: Q-OR ‘,"*Signature of Property Owner: Title:12-iS D afr fa A- S Date: 5//61//_6- PrintedlTyped Name of Propel Avner: {j Title: C L ' JJ E Hioilv Date: Z__l_sp,0_,,e__Le .,--*Signature of Property Owner: Title: Printed/Typed Name of Property Owner: Date: —Signature of Property Owner: Title: Printed/Typed Name of Property Owner: Date: *Application must he signed by the individual applicant, each partner of a partnership, or by an authorized officer of a corporation or association. b.W.Brow+m APPO1NTMENT OF AGENT'-IQ-09.doc LAND USE STATEMENT 1. State the purpose of the request and include applicable background information as to the development plan for the property, i.e., usage of property, number and square footage(s) of existing and/or proposed buildings)/unit(s), building(s)/unit(s) height, parking plans/spaces, phasing schedule of development, number of employee(s) associated with the office, business or industrial development, hours of operation, modification or demolition plans for existing structure(s), type, area and setback of signage, etc. The purpose of this request is to change the zoning of this property from RM -3 to RS- TH. The property is a platted lot, fronting on Ambrosia Street, and is currently vacant. The existing property to the east is occupied by two four unit townhome structures. The existing property to the south, across Ambrosia Street, consists of a single family residential subdivision. The existing property to the west is occupied by a four-plex residential unit. The existing property to the north is partly vacant and partly commercial use. The proposed use of the property includes the construction of a single structure containing four townhome units. The structure will be oriented on the lot so as to allow a 24 foot wide vehicular access drive, and a 5 foot width sidewalk along its front. The entire 29 foot width of the drive and sidewalk will be dedicated as an access and utility easement. Common or green space will be provided at front and rear of the lot. The four townhome units will be two story design, with approximately 1,100 square feet of enclosed space on each floor. The first floor of each unit will include garage space to accommodate two vehicles per unit. An additional outside parking space will be provided to meet the total nine parking spaces required. The mean roof height of the building will be approximately 22 feet. 2. identify the existing land uses adjoining the area of request: North - South - East - West - Commercial Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential C:1LISERSITANYA.R.ODI iDESKTOPID4ELY USE ANNIKAILAND USE STATEMENT FOR ZONING.DOC DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. if the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". NAME: yu - tottnoc ' o fr?JZ1 STREET: licip- Cr(/03 CITY: FIRM is: Corporation Partnership cotpL5 /PLA1 ore Owner Association ( ) Other DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Title 4 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Board, Commission, or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". U 0„3,lrme- Consultant CERTIFICATE 1 certify that ail information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Yu N—D,VG H-4(111 ti Title: 6111 TS) Elec (Print Name) j� Signature of Certifying Person: _ 'L Date: K:1DEVELOW ENTSVCS S! s.REDILRIQD DEVELOP 4EtWTVLPFLIc&flON FORMS REZ.OI:IDFSCLCSURE OF INTERESTS STATEMEN 5.12.241CAOC Certifying Person: NAME: DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". a 1 1 144 S0 v �-, I STREET: S -5 -0 -e -c S 714 (..es CITY: (oo li5 (1q4 71 T. ZIP: 7, 4.4) FIRM is: Corporation °Partnership l ole Owner Association Other DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name n l� Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Board, Commission, or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name a)/4 Consultant CERTIFICATE I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: tName Signature of Certifying Person: 0S 12it..t _. Title: e . 5 EA/7 Date: 9 �� 8 K\DEVELOPMENTSVCS4SHAREDILAND DEVELOPME • PLICATION FORMSIREZONING\DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS STATEMENT 5.122015.DOC Persons with disabilities planning to attend this meeting, who may require special services, are requested to contact the Development Services Department at least 48 hours in advance at (361) 826-3240. Personas con incaoacidades, ' aue tienen la intention de asistir a esta junta v me reauieren servicios esoeciales. se les suolica aue den aviso 48 horas antes de la junta Ilamando al departamento de servicios de desarrollo, al ntimero (361) 826-3240. If you wish to address the Commission during the meeting and your English is limited, please call the Development Services Department at (361) 826-3240 at least 48 hours in advance to request an interpreter be present during the meeting. Si usted desea diriairse a la commission durante la junta v su irides es limitado, favor de Ilamar al departamento de servicios de desarrollo al ntimero (361) 826-3240 al menos 48 horas antes de la iunta oara solicitar un interprete ser presente durante la junta. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Rezoning Case No. 0316-06 Yun W. Hwang has petitioned the City of Corpus Christi to consider a change of zoning from the "RM -3" Multifamily 3 District to the "RS-TH/PUD" Townhouse District with a Planned Unit Development Overlay, resulting in a change to the Future Land Use Map from low density residential uses to medium density residential uses. The property to be rezoned is described as: Lot 1-B, Block 1, Padre Island No. 1, together with that portion of Estrada Drive (now closed), adjacent to said Lot 1-B, Block 1, Padre Island No. 1, located on the north side of Ambrosia Street between Scallop Street and Indigo Street. The Planning Commission may recommend to City Council approval or denial, or approval of an intermediate zoning classification and/or changes to the proposed Planned Unit Development Overlay. Approval of a change of zoning, if inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, will also have the effect of amending the Comprehensive Plan to reflect the approved zoning. The Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing for this rezoning request to discuss and formulate a recommendation to the City Council. The public hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 6, 2016, during one of the Planning Commission's regular meetings, which begins at 5:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 1201 Leopard Street. You are invited to attend this public hearing to express your views on this rezoning request. For more information, please call (361) 826-3240. TO BE ON RECORD, THIS FORM MUST BE FILLED OUT, SIGNED BY THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER(S) AND MAILED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, P. O. BOX 9277, CORPUS CHRISTI. TEXAS 78469- 9277. ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED BELOW BECOMES PUBLIC RECORD. NOTE: In accordance with the Planning Commission By -Laws, no discussion shall be held by a member or members of this Commission with an applicant or appellant concerning an application or appeal, eithe at home or office, or in_person, by telephone call or by letter. Printed Name: Address: J 4-/.3 d / ( ) IN FAVOR REASON: OPPOSITION City/State: ( /' f 5(:,14/7:5 - Phone: //_ Phone:..//O ' Ste— 4 J it -le 1.1; /Ar:5- c -[i c<y bcv)9 —7 ,7 e?le hcry 710 //t 1 K ' � 5 pee 7s 44161;://7c.„7„1.1 • f 14 p eo‘kilwi /?42 91� ' # 41) SEE MAP ON REVERSE SIDE Property Owner ID 5 HTE# 15-10000057 Case No. 0316-06 Project Manager: Dolores Wood X = Outside 200' Area Petition Opposition - Case No. 0316-06 = Opposed within 023052 122'120011 CR -21F0 13033 44 9'1' 14302 13934 14010 14022 14020 140,33 14313. - ,. ,2 1430 I Q . . '',' . 'IC 1430C ‘030258 St' 14301 , .02014 1431% , 14310 .y, ..,. .b '14201 ls , 1 5 114325 1. . 1 le City of Corpus Christi 258 ft 11. City of Coque 01.11 cses Me most arrant and complete Cala available. However, GIS 3332 product accuracy may vary. GIS dew and droduMs may be developed from sources of dIfferIng accuracy. accurate only at certain scales. based on modallng or Inter...on, Incomplele while Iwina t:Fti21K1 FiqViF.HFI. 71. Cry or Cock, 01r reserves Me riald unceol, rptlale. muddy. or rerldro. GIS proill GIs nolilicalinc The Oily or Corpus 01Wsli rec., assure asmtrary, ownpleleness, rill. information 'or any parlicular purpose. Usk a AIS :Iala for purcuces olber Merl acme for whil, Hwy were created rrdy yield icarmurele trr n Glear The rod,' unl may asserl any proprielary rialds M inforrralirw nor repteserl loan,. as carer Gocernmenl-produced TwCily of Corpus Chricli shall null. Nm any aolivily involving Clic iliormalirm with ressecl ro los( profits lust sduidas 1/1 ally oilier consequential damages Powered by VANTAGEPOINT To: Corpus Christi Planning Commission RE: Notice of Opposition to Zoning Change Cas Location: Ambrosia Street, Corpus Christi, TX 78418 ID :1==.111DEvELorTr.tir7fat!April 5, 2016 : APR 2 SPECIAL SLRVMCCS As property owners in the area, we the undersigned request that the Corpus Christi Planning Commission deny the request for a zoning change on Ambrosia Street, case # 0316-06. Reasons for the denial are the following: The change would contribute to a too dense population in our neighborhood, especially of short term renters. This change would decrease the value of our properties. We have come to this conclusion after seeing the 10 unit development (Anegada) next door to this lot. We feel we need to protect our neighborhood by stopping this and all further zoning change requests. NAME p4d-/P /f 4 (.;-><4 t + t -b x K k f.Ye' 6/ y,,t ,L) 3 i &Qc+ Gc rdiv r )6-4326 'o rIbar4 � r ° I3c9 S 5 bat ccey- ✓J'y 3o( (Vr2ureen Hurlo w Xi4 3131 Sea,JIo p cc- y 7-1 s �; �/SE 1,/6- 4Ps 1/41-} °4.9 SGA!!%% cc7-7, 7RYc.8�� ADDRESS Set/Lto, r et-7�''�r� // y S7` cc l X 7b(f/7 Sc / /. � � r� 57 C. C T( (t 5`—'\I oQ 53 c -c-"` `13LM &-A,11013 ST c,En 7q-116 Sc. ri v S r C �i X 7e//t 7Not60 Sr c6rr• 764M To: Corpus Christi Planning Commission RE: Notice of Opposition to Zoning Change Case # 0316-06 Location: Ambrosia Street, Corpus Christi, TX 78418 April 5, 2016 4 APR 2 0 2016 Ld' VELUP^I�S.T SERVICr SP`C 1 S' RV CCS As property owners in the area, we the undersigned request that the Corpus Christi Planning Commission deny the request for a zoning change on Ambrosia Street, case # 0316-06. Reasons for the denial are the following: The change would contribute to a too dense population in our neighborhood, especially of short term renters. This change would decrease the value of our properties. We have come to this conclusion after seeing the 10 unit development (Anegada) next door to this lot. We feel we need to protect our neighborhood by stopping this and all further zoning change requests. NA daillihrof, _��. - • it DRESS 1,11 QLVS l%,c% 41r. Ar r1/3zCeW1 's sl ,},tht,\ q '36c NI aux o -T�`•\��.ea04tnafq 1 I X61'9 Li-Lfz3/r_f_g, "11 -r---- v 610z. J s AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading for the City Council Meeting of May 17, 2016 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 DATE: TO: FROM: May 2, 2016 Ronald L. Olson, City Manager Mike Markle, Chief of Police mikema@cctexa.scom 886-2603 Accept additional grant funding from the Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy to support the Police Departments role in the Texas Coastal Corridor Initiative in the Houston High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA). CAPTION: Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept additional grant funding in the amount of $9,100.65 from the Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy, to support the Police Departments role in the Texas Coastal Corridor Initiative in the Houston High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA); and appropriating the $9,100.65 in the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund. PURPOSE: Appropriate additional funds. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: HIDTA has provided the additional funds to be used for equipment and supplies. ALTERNATIVES: None OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Conforms to all city policies. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Finance Legal FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015- 2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item $9,100.65 $9,100.65 BALANCE $9,100.65 $9,100.65 Fund(s): Police Grants Fund Comments: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriating the funds. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Award document Ordinance Authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept additional grant funding in the amount of $9,100.65 from the Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy, to support the Police Department's role in the Texas Coastal Corridor Initiative in the Houston High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA); and appropriating the $9,100.65 in the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute all documents necessary to accept additional grant funding in the amount of $9,100.65 from the Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy to support the Police Department's role in the Texas Coastal Corridor Initiative in the Houston High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA). SECTION 2. That $9,100.65 is appropriated in the No 1061 Police Grants Fund from the Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy for funding the Police Department's role in the Texas Coastal Corridor Initiative in the Houston High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA). That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre PASSED AND APPROVED, this the th day of ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor April 22, 2016 Chief Mike Markle Corpus Christi Police Department 32I John Sartain Street Corpus Christi, TX 78403-2511 Dear Chief Markle: Grant number G 15HN0006A has been increased and now totals $177,300.65. The original of Modification 2 is enclosed. If you accept this Modification, sign the Modification and return a copy to the Assistance Center in Miami. Keep the original Modification for your file. All terms and conditions of the original award apply to the Modification. if you have any questions pertaining to this grant award, please feel free to contact Lisa Newton at (202) 395-6639. Sincerely, L1{'it/lad Michael K. Gottlieb National HIDTA Director Enclosures Executive Office of the President Office of National Drug Control Policy AWARD Grant Page 1 of 1 1. Recipient Name and Address Chief Mike Markle Corpus Christi Police Department 32I John Sartain Street Corpus Christi, TX 78403-25I I 4. Award Number: G 15HN0006A 5. Grant Period: From 01/0I/2015 to 12/31.20I6 1A. SubrecipientIRS/Vendor No. 6. Date: 4/22/2016 7. Action Initial X❑Supplemental Subrecipient Name and Address 8. Supplement Number 2 2A. Subrecipient IRS/Vendor No.: 9. Previous Award Amount $ I68,200.00 3. Project Title Multiple 10. Amount of This Award: $9,100.65 11. Total Award: $177,300.65 12. • The above grant is approved subject to such conditions or limitation as are set forth in the original Grant. 13. Statutory Authority for Grant: Public Law 113-235 / H.R. 83 AGENCY APPROVAL RECIPIENT ACCEPTANCE I4. Typed Name and Title of Approving Official Michael K. Gottlieb National H1DTA Director 15. Typed Name and Title of Authorized Official Mike Markle Chief 16. Signature of Approving ONDCP Official LtGALtik. 5-10.144( e 15 I7. Signature of Authorized Recipient/Date 77(1 "--2, AGENCY USE ONLY 18. Accounting Classification Code DUNS: 069457786 EIN: 1746000574A5 19. H1DTA AWARD OND I070DB 1516XX OND6113 OND2000000000 OC 410001 IID: 49782 Initiative Cash by HIDTA Lt O N Current Budget (net of reprogrammed funds) V 70M Agency Name G 15 HN0006A 4/22/2016 7:39:15 AM Budget Detail 2015 - Houston Initiative - Texas Coastal Corridor Initiative (TCCI) Award Recipient - Corpus Christi Police Department (G15HN0006A) Resource Recipient - Corpus Christi Police Department Indirect Cost: 0.0% Current Budget (net of reprogrammed funds) $9,100.65 Equipment Quantity Amount Equipment Total Equipment $4,754.00 $4,754.00 Supplies Quantity Amount Supplies Total Supplies Total Budget $4,346.65 $4,346.65 $9,100.65 Page 1 of 1 4/22/2016 7:39:16 AM AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of May 17, 2016 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 DATE: April 29, 2016 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Dan McGinn, Interim Director, Development Services Department Daniel Mc@cctexas.com (361) 826-3595 Abandoning and vacating a blanket pipeline easement, located at the northeast corner of Staples Street and Wooldridge Drive CAPTION: Ordinance abandoning and vacating a portion of an existing blanket easement, located at Lokey Subdivision, Block 16D, Lot 5, located north of Wooldridge Drive, and east of the South Staples Street public street right-of-way; Requiring the owner of the lot, Brimhall Enterprises, Inc., to comply with the specified conditions. PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to eliminate a pipeline easement that was recorded at Nueces County under Vol. 269 pages 249-250 and allow for the future sale of the property. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Brimhall Enterprises, Inc., (Owner) is requesting the abandonment and vacation of an existing blanket easement, located at Lokey Subdivision, Block 16D, Lot 5, located north of Wooldridge Drive, and east of the South Staples Street public street right-of-way, in order to provide for redevelopment over the existing easement area. The easement to be abandoned and vacated is located in a "CG -2" General Commercial District. Houston Natural Gas Corporation assigned the City of Corpus Christi Gas Department (Corpus Christi Municipal Gas Corporation) the blanket easement right-of-way on December 29, 1954, the City Council and Mayor of the City approved the assigned transfer with Ordinance No. 4018. On August 19, 1959, City Council and Mayor of the City amended Ordinance No. 4018 and approved a final assignment of transfer with Ordinance No. 5467. ALTERNATIVES: Denial of the blanket pipeline easement closure. This will, however, adversely impact the Owner's ability to move forward with future sale of the subject property. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: These requirements are in compliance with the City of Corpus Christi, Code of Ordinances, Section 49-13, as amended and approved on July 13, 2004, by Ordinance No. 025816. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Gas Department was contacted. Gas Department doesn't have any facilities, or objections regarding the proposed blanket easement abandonment. FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital • •Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015- 2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance. The Owner must comply with all the following specified conditions of the ordinance: a. Upon approval by the City Council and issuance of the ordinance, all grants of easement closure and specified conditions must be recorded at the Owners' expense in the Official Deed and Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, in which the affected property is located, with a copy of the recording provided to the City. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Location Maps Ordinance abandoning and vacating of an existing blanket easement, located at Lokey Subdivision, Block 16D, Lot 5 that was recorded at Nueces County Deed Records Vol. 269 pages 249-250 and located north of Wooldridge Drive, and east of the South Staples Street public street right-of-way; and requiring the owner of the lot, Brimhall Enterprises, Inc., to comply with the specified conditions. WHEREAS, Brimhall Enterprises, Inc., (Owner) is requesting the abandonment and vacation of an existing blanket easement, located at Lokey Subdivision, Block 16D, Lot 5, recorded at Nueces County Deed Records under Vol. 269 pages 249-250 and located north of Wooldridge Drive, and east of the South Staples Street public street right-of-way, in order to provide for redevelopment over the existing easement area. The easement to be abandoned and vacated is located in a "CG -2" General Commercial District. WHEREAS, it has been determined that it is feasible and advantageous to the City of Corpus Christi to abandon and vacate said pipeline easement, subject to compliance by the Owners with the conditions specified in this ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the existing blanket easement located at Lokey Subdivision, Block 16D, Lot 5, as recorded in Vol. 269 pages 249-250 of the Deed Records of Nueces County, Texas, located north of Wooldridge Drive and east of the South Staples Street public right-of-way, is abandoned and vacated, subject to compliance with the conditions specified in Section 2 below. SECTION 2. The abandonment and vacation of the blanket easement described in Section 1 of this ordinance is expressly conditioned upon the Owners' compliance with the following requirements: a. Upon approval by the City Council and issuance of the ordinance, all grants of easement closure and specified conditions must be recorded at the Owners' expense in the Official Deed and Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, in which the affected property is located, with a copy of the recording provided to the City. The foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre The foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 20 ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor R. Ifl GZ7' T. 10 4191 L' 10 11' NOT CC, 01 s 0 S C• - ,6•0 00' 9 J ] TricwLCc�NiTVec vem�-. ,el+- "TEG. Ac ¢L�s �F l�-,.I� nl 1 i I AAD, 2,1 ,PARED 1.1. 3C 1,1 Feer STATE 0 TEXAS COUNTY O MACES CITIZENS BANK 0 CORPUS CHRISTI, A TEXAS HARKINS COI/MAIM, MEREST CERTIFIES THAT IT 1* 00 A LIEN ON THE PROPERTY WWII ON THE FORE*00 MAP DENIED BY MARY ELIZABETH 1001. AN0. SANDRA FAY DUNNING, CAROLYN ANN TRAMMELL AND JAMES BAILEY WRIMIT, JR. AND IT APPROVES Of THE RESUBDIVISION FORM PURPOSES TIER. EXPRESSED. CITIZENS BANE Or COPSES CMISTI PHI ELM VICE-PRESIDENT STATE OF TEXAS MOM 0 MECES Exhibit A PLAT OF LOKEY SUBDIVISION BLOCK 16D, LOTS 5 & 6 BEING A REPLAT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 16D, LOKEY SUBDIVISION, A MAP OF WHICH 15 RECORDED IN VOLUME 46, PAGE 235, MAP RECORDS OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS. STAT O TEXAS CORTY U MECES ARY ELEAABETH AS BAILEY WIGHT. JR WHIM/ CAME 11MT W AN M . SANAA Mr mown. YOAENS Cf m Aro TNTE LAME ARO JAMS DIMACED WHEW DE DPMAPCS a M FOREGOING MAT: THAT ID SSHOW, NT SAB LA TSTAMM AS sFW AM De n)TTC T e MLR IME R: HST IASBNnSSAM ARE MUGnD TCM PAM USE MI M NSTADATNR, WD, ADEDICATVA ION. of NNW N. 1 AI MODE C 1NAT ME MAP WAS MAIN FOR M REPR a F MSM WYa /lL.L ISM. HMI' ELI7151 TRAVDAN�DD 1n SAIPPA RAL OMEN" LARCLYN Nm TRAMMEL JAMS MILEY T. Al STATE Of TMS CRMma MACES MS 115I11OBNT WAS ACRIONISWDBRMM. MARY ELILYETN TMVLIAND: INS DE ti 101a '0. .• 1900 Btqy Zvy N Xl44 STAR Of GMT/ AURCES TNM RSTINEMT WAS ACXMMIUFFDBEFOEH DY SAMA MY BENIN. MSM. MVO J. Hee L14,pn IISpMT J( YACCAEOCEj riIFKKKRA n.,n BEnj ry f F4 fSA0 E R4DR '565PG:nw,l EdrT .ccamrva NIECES THIS INSTRUMENT WAS 20 0 0 106ED BEFORE ME BV 800018 BRICKLEY. VICE-PRESIDENT O CITIZENS BANE O CORPUS CHRISTI. IN BEHALF Of SAID CCIPCICATCH. 1HS O 1980 Mda'YRt.. 5TATE a TEXAS 11M NDNEDIT WAS ADDSAUDNO MEQM BY CABIN Ml j 1MSM //J� '01-T Iwe �y SIAM a HMS d, D. R60dee STAR Slugs COUNTY V NAM D-'J- rnL.N, oeAnt>w+l+ TIBAAAie� `}EAI iS NOT CIWAWtIyy,, L.E.i01E FRK 3rtT:sFXeioe. 4a.f Ed,AT:OI'. no (*1' 1.219 rnAP-IM l Ifs k\,v0.fd2 FILED HER RECORD MARION LMMIMDED. CONN DMZ MACES COMM 705 3 LARAneM MAP STATE 0 TEXAS COMITY OF MACES I, EUGENE C. URBAN. REGISTERED PUBLIC SLRYTYGR FIR URBAN EXBNEERIN6. HEREBY CER051 THAT THE FOEG0NG MAP WAS PREPARED FROM MAYS NAGE CR TIE BROOM UPPER MY DIRECTION AND 15 TRU AND CORRECT: THAT I HAVE BEEN ENGAGED MISER CONTRACT TO SET ALL L0T AMI BAWD COMR5 AS SMOAR IEP£CN AID//TD CCIPLETE SUCH OPERATIONS WT OUT DELAY. THIS THE 200AY CE .//059'tL . W C. URBAN. P.P.S. EXA (CENSE N0. 1.0 STAT 0 TEXAS CORY was CIIGENE C. CSP �o- THIS FINAL PLAT a TIE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY VAS APPRDVED BY VICTOR 5. IIEDIMA. P1., CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY Cf CCPPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS. THIS THE .%DAY OXY 195 VICTOR 5. MEDINA. D.E., CITY 011611EE6 STATED TEXAS CHANTY OF NIECES THIS FINAL PLAT R THE HEREIN 0SCRIOD PROPERTY WAS APPROVED BY TIE PI AH11116 CM1155101 0 TE CITY O COPS MIST!. TEXAS. PROVIDED, HOWEVER. MIS APPRWAL SHALL BE INVALID AM ME 11MEE1I55 THIS PLAT BE FILED WITH TEE COUNTY CLEW WITHIN SIX 16/ MONTHS HEREAFTER. 100 DIE BAY Cf /Ward? 199 MIC RAASCH. SECRETARY 89-021 STATE 0 TEXAS COUNTY 0 NIECES I, MARION UEEILIM ER. CLERK 0 TIE COMP" C5BIT IN A10 FOR Ip,C0NTY. DD HERB CERTIFY THAT TIE FOREGO16 INSTRUMENT ENT DATED SHE an_ DAY PRL L ITS CERTIFICATE 0 AUTHENTICATION WA5 FR16 OF ED FOR MCO0 jM IV TIE lit- DAY 0 HYLRII 1908_ Ar 3144 O'CLOCK .Y. M.. AW DAY REc1Fdf0 THE -U-DAY 0 "VIM AY (VBA., At (LIRE OCLOX$M.,YNSAID awry N INYYK.,L3_, 0146[ A l9 JEAP /MAIMS. WITMSSS MY HAND AND SEAL 0 THE COUNTY COURT, IN AND FOR 5A10 CONTY, AT OFFICE 111 CORNS MORI. TEXAS. TH DAY AND YEAR LAST WRITTEN. TILS YmMKURWASA, BY MIQEM BY AVMS BA11[Y .A�.oRdes coma NEOs sena AT.PJi'1H_OLLOCK 'D WiIAY 0 1911cL 51'.1Cta0.5_ DEPUTY &A•. MARION IIENLINGER CLEW CONN CWRT MEM CO.NIY, 18XA5 IIUNMAN ENGINEERING ammo 8,,,ZrVW..E,ave,M„- 12 re� Lthnn K..-W.CCF�'+ JO1NO 2'10)0-W.Q7 DEPUTY 2 -¢c -p8 II - 1cn' ca 241 the terms hereof ehallLbe binding upon all Parties hereto, and/or their heirs, administrators, successors or assigns—The acceptance hereof by Second Party shall be sufficient evidence of the agreement by Second fgrty with all Of the terms and provielona hereof. Witness our handsi this the 11 day of February A.D. 1941. PONM APPROVED O.D.N. - c STATE OF TEXAS( n, Lorena >sirk, FIRST PARTY NUECPS COUNTY Q BEFORE ME , the undersigned authority, m this day personally appeared Lorena Kirk known to me to/be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument of writ- ing and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpose, and consideration therein expressed. Given under my band and seal of office, this the 11 day of Feb. A.D. 1941. F.H. de Cordova, Notary Public , (Nueces Co., Tex. L.S.) Nuecee County, Texas. ENDORSED: PIPE -LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY FILED FOR RECORD AT 8:00 o'clock A.M. Apr 19 1941 MRS. HENRY E. GOUGER CTlerk, Couhty?Caurt; Nuecee County, Texas By R.G. Ward Deputy. RECORDED: THIS THE 29th day of Apr A.D. 1941 At 2:46 o'clock P.M. Vol. 269 Pages 248-249 MRS. HENRY E. GOUGER COUNTY CIERK. BY I \._.,., 0�. a -✓� DEPUTY. N0. 1621441 .PI -FIELD STATE OFTEXASI) NUBGES COUNTY 4 THi9HMEM0RANDUM OF AN AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between Mrs Carl Haltom, a widow of Nuecee. County, Texas,. hereinafter, whether one or more, known as First Party, and Houston Natural 0aa.Corpora.tion, a Texas Corporation with its domicile at Houston, Texas, hereinafter known as Second Party., WITNESSETH: (1) First Party, for end in coneideratl m of the payment to it by Second 'Party of the Sum'of One Dollar (1.00) the !ocelot of which is hereby acknowledged and confessed, and for the other end further considerations, conditions and re- servations hereinafter mentioned, does hereby grant, sell and convey unto Second Party a right- of-way to lay_,.-co:lttruct, maintain, operate, repair, and remove, a pipe Line for the tranaportati of gas, mineral solutions and other similar commodities, at a location and on a route to be selected by Second Party, over, through a:Wu:ion the following tracts or parcels of land, situate in Nueoes County, Texas, to -wit: Lota A and B block one (1) and lot D block sixteen (16) of the Lokey Subdivision, ae shown on the plat of record in the map records of Nuecee County, Texas. Being a resubdivision of lots one (1) to five (5) and lots twelve (12) to sixteen (16) Section twelve (12) Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, Alio all reasonable right of ingrain: and -egress at all reasonable times for the purpose. of the use and enjoyment of the rights herein granted. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Bald aaesment and/or right-of-way, unto the said Second Party, its successors and assigns, so longue the name shell be ueed for the purpose for which granted, but subject to the terms and provisions hereof. It la agreed and a tlpulated that Second Party shall be liable to First Party for all damages by reason of any injury or injuries to the growing crops or other property of Firat Party on or about said land, the liability for such damages end the amount of much damages,in the event of disagreement between First Party and se- rcond Party, to be determined by a Board of Atbitretion, consisting of three (3) persons,' m e of wham shall be selected by Firat Party, ena one of whdmh shall be selected by Second Party, and the two (2) persona thus selected shell select the third person. A decision of such Board of Arbitration , or a majority thereof, given in writing, shall be final and binding upon the (•2,) Parties hereto./mineral solutions and other similar commodities. All of auch pipe lines shall be rie. .. that the o. of same shall be below .low d:.th. (3) t'he rights hereby 250' granted to Second party by Flrat Party phell, upon demand in writing by First Party, revert to First Party if Second Party shall, for a period of two (2) years, voluntarily cease to u se all such pipe lines; provided Second Part shall have six (6) months after the receipt of auch demand in writing within which either to resume operations or remove said pipdi.line or pipe lines. (4) First Party warrents that he La the owner L`n fee simple of said property or has the right and authority to enter into this agreement. Second party may change the size of its pipes and/or linea laid hereunder as end when it aces fit, and the resulting damage, if any, shall be determin and paid First Party by Second Party in acoordence with Section (1) above. (5) This Agreement and all the terms hereof shall be binding upon all Parties hereto, and/or their heirs, administrators succeesore or assigns. The acceptance hereof by Second Party shall be sufficient evidence of the agreement by. Second Party with all of the tensa and'provisiona hereof. Witness our kande_, this the 10 day of February, A.D. 1941. Mre. Carl Haltom FORM APPROVED O.D. N. PIRST PARTY STATE OF TERASQ NUECES COUNTY. Q BEFORE ME, the. undersigned authority, on thio d ay personally appeared Mrs. Carl Haltom known tome to be the.peraon whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, of writing and acknowledged to me that he Minuted the same for the purpose: and consideration there, in expreaeod. Given under my hand and seal of office, this the 10 day of Feb A.L. 1941. F.H. de Cordova, Notary Public, (Nuecea Co., Tex. L.S.) Nuecea County, Texas. ENDORSED: PIPE LINE RIGHT -OP -WAY FILED FOR RECORD AT 8:00 o'clodk A.M. Apr 19 1941 MRS. HENRY E. GOUGER Clerk, County Cburt, Nuecea County, Towel By R.C. Word Deputy. RECORDED: THIS THE 29th day of Apr A.D. 1941 At 3:10 o'clock P.M. At Vol. 269 Pages 249-250 MRS. HENRY E. GOUGER COUNTY CLERK. BY p�-� /1 DEPUTY. NO. 162146 Job #02-1437-74 STATE 0? ILLINOI_SQ COOK COUNTY Q THIS MEMORANDUM OF AN AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between Chesser W. Howe of Cook County, Illinois, hereinafter, whether one or more, known as blrst Party, end Houston Natural Gee Corporation, a Texas Corporation with its domicile at Houston Texas, herein- after known as Second Party, WITNESSETH: (1) Pipet Party, for and to consideration of the payment to it by Second Party of the eum of One (1.00) Duller, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledge end confessed, end for the other and further considerations, conditions and reeervationa here- , inaftar mentioned,. d�aq,hereby grant, sell end convey unto Second Party a right-of-way to lay, i7�' construct, maintains operate, repair, and remove, a Pipe Line for the transportation of gas, mineral solutions and4itifer similar commodities, at a location and on a route to be selected by Second Party, over, through and upon the following tracts or percale of lend situated in Nue- cea County, Texee, to -wit: The north one held (j) or'the north one half (I)of lot thirty two (32) Section thirteen (13) of the Flour Bluff and Encinal Form and Garden Tracts, as shown by the plat of record in the ®p records of Nuecea County, Texee. Also ell reasonable right of ingress and agrees et ell reasonable time:: for the purpose of -the the end endoyment of the rights herein gran - ed. TO HAVE -AND TO HOLD the said eaaement and/or right-of-way, unto the said Second Party, its auccasaora and assigns, 40 long as the same shall be used for the purpose for which granted, but subject to the termq/provisions hereof. It le agreed ends tipulated that Second Party shell be liable to First Party for all damages by reason of any injury or injuries to the growing crops or w=. Vicinity Map Lokey Block 16-D, Lot 5 and 6 Goff of Mexico Aerial Overview 1 N Aerial AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of May 17, 2016 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 DATE: 5/2/2016 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Dan McGinn, AICP CFM, Interim Director, Development Services DanielMc@cctexas.com (361) 826-3595 Approval of agreement and appropriating funds for Peterson Properties, Ltd., for the construction of sanitary sewer trunk line, force main and lift station CAPTION: Ordinance authorizing city manager or designee to execute a sanitary sewer trunk line, force main and lift station construction and reimbursement agreement ("Agreement") with Peterson Properties, Ltd., ("Developer"), for the construction of a sanitary sewer trunk line, force main and lift station and appropriating $911,341.24 from the No. 4220 Sanitary Sewer Trunk System Trust Fund to reimburse the Developer in accordance with the Agreement. PURPOSE: Peterson Properties, Ltd., is required to install 7,040 linear feet of 6 -inch wastewater force main, 8 -inch trunk line and a lift station with a flow of 470-gmp in order to provide adequate wastewater to a proposed commercial subdivision development. The subdivision is located on the southeast corner of South Padre Island Drive and Old Brownsville Road. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Per Section 8.5.2. E (2) and Section 8.5.2.4 Credits and Reimbursements of the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), Peterson Properties, Ltd., is requesting a Reimbursement Agreement for the development of Westpoint Crossing, Block 1, Lots 1 & 2 as shown on the final plat. The subdivision is located on the southeast corner of South Padre Island Drive and Old Brownsville Road. The development requires the extension of 7,040 linear feet of 6 -inch wastewater force main, 8 -inch trunk line and a lift station with a flow of 470-gmp in order to provide adequate wastewater to the property. A layout of existing and proposed improvements is included as Exhibit 3. The 6 -inch wastewater force main, 8 -inch trunk line and lift station is eligible for full reimbursement from the Sanitary Sewer Collection Line Trust Fund. The Wastewater Master Plan calls for the construction of a 6 -inch wastewater collection line and lift station along Old Brownsville Road. If the actual costs for installation of such wastewater force main and lift station are greater than the lot or acreage fee, the developer shall be reimbursed (less any lot or acreage fee credits) from funds available from the Sanitary Sewer Trunk System Trust Fund for that portion of the wastewater force main and lift station installed by the developer. The total amount reimbursable is $911,341.24. ALTERNATIVES: Disapproval of the Reimbursement Agreement. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The developer will be extending a 6 -inch wastewater force main, 8 -inch trunk line and a lift station with a flow of 470-gmp to serve the proposed commercial development and has requested a Reimbursement Agreement, as provided in the Unified Development Code. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal Finance FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not Applicable Fiscal Year: 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $1,972,566.71 Encumbered / Expended Amount This item $911,341.24 BALANCE $1,061,225.47 Fund(s): Sanitary Sewer Trunk System Trust Fund Comments: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Agreement Location Map ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A SANITARY SEWER TRUNK LINE, FORCE MAIN AND LIFT STATION CONSTRUCTION AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT ("AGREEMENT") WITH PETERSON PROPERTIES, LTD., ("DEVELOPER"), FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WASTEWATER TRUNK MAIN, FORCE MAIN AND LIFT STATION AND APPROPRIATING $911,341.24 FROM THE NO. 4220 SANITARY SEWER TRUNK SYSTEM TRUST FUND TO REIMBURSE THE DEVELOPER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AGREEMENT. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The City Manager, or his designee, is authorized to execute a sanitary sewer trunk line, force main and lift station construction and reimbursement agreement ("Agreement") with Peterson Properties, Ltd., including all related appurtenances, for the development of Westpoint Crossing, Block 1, Lots 1 and 2 Subdivision, in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas. SECTION 2. Funding in the amount of $911,341.24 is appropriated from the No. 4220 Sanitary Sewer Trunk System Trust Fund to reimburse the Developer for the construction of the sanitary sewer trunk line, force main and lift station construction improvements in accordance with the Agreement. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre PASSED AND APPROVED, this the th day of ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor WASTEWATER TRUNK LINE, FORCE MAIN AND LIFT STATION CONSTRUCTION AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NUECES This Wastewater trunk line, force main and lift station Construction and Reimbursement Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into between the City of Corpus Christi ("City"), a Texas home -rule municipality, and Peterson Properties, Ltd., ("Developer/Owner"), a Texas limited partnership. WHEREAS, the Developer/Owner, in compliance with the City's Unified Development Code ("UDC"), has a plat, approved by the Planning Commission on March 9, 2016 to develop a tract of land, to wit: 35.41 acres of land being portions of Lots 9 through 11, and portions of Lots 14 through 15, Section 5, Range VIII, of the Gugenheim & Cohn's Farm Lots, known as Westpoint Crossing Block 1, Lots 1 and 2, located along Old Brownsville Road on the southeast corner of Old Brownsville Road and North Padre Island Drive (SH 358), as shown in the attached Exhibit 1, the content of such exhibit being incorporated by reference into this Agreement. WHEREAS, under the UDC, the Developer/Owner is responsible for construction of the wastewater trunk line, force main and lift station ("Trunk Line, Force Main and Lift Station"); WHEREAS, under the UDC, the Developer/Owner is eligible for reimbursement of the Developer/Owner's costs for the construction of Trunk Line, Force Main and Lift Station; WHEREAS, it is to the best interest of the City that the Trunk Line, Force Main and Lift Station be constructed to its ultimate capacity under the City's applicable Master Plan; WHEREAS, Section 8.5.2.E.2 of the UDC authorizes the acceptance of applications to be eligible for reimbursement in the future when funds become fully available in the Sanitary Sewer Trunk System Trust Fund and are appropriated by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Developer/Owner has submitted an application for reimbursement of the costs from the Sanitary Sewer Trunk System Trust Fund for installing the Trunk Line, Force Main and Lift Station, as shown in Exhibit 2, the content of such exhibit being incorporated by reference into this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained in this Agreement, the parties do covenant and agree as follows: 1. REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION. Developer/Owner shall construct the Trunk Line, Force Main and Lift Station in compliance with the City's UDC and under the plans and specifications approved by the City's Development Services Engineer. 2. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. a. Developer/Owner shall contract with a professional engineer, acceptable to the City's Development Services Engineer, to prepare plans and specifications for the Trunk Line, Force Main and Lift Station, as shown in the attached Exhibit 3, the content of such exhibit being incorporated by reference into this Agreement, with the following basic design: 1. 1 Lump Sum General Conditions 2. Mobilization 3. Install one (1) Lift Station — Total flow of 470 gpm a. 8 inch diameter wet well b. (2) two each 5HP 480V Pumps c. One 6 inch Force Main 4. Install 7,040 linear feet of 6" PVC Green C-900 Force Main (DR 25) 5. Install one (1) 6" D.I. 90 Degree Bend (M.J.) 6. Install twenty (20) 6" D.I. 45 Degree Bend (M.J.) 7. Install three (3) 7 6" D.I. 22 1/2 Degree Bend (M.J.) 8. Install three (3) 6" Plug Valves 9. Install three (3) Air Release Valves 10. Install 44 linear feet of 12" Steel Casing 11. Install 75 square yards of Asphalt Repair 12. One (1) Lump Sum Tie Proposed Force Main to Existing Manhole 13. One (1) Lump Sum Twin 30" RCP with S.E.T 14. Install 900 square feet 14 7" Thick Concrete Driveway 15. Install 368 linear feet 10" PVC Gravity Line (14'-16' Cut) 16. Install 683 linear feet 10" PVC Gravity Line (12'-14' Cut) 17. Install 449 linear feet 10" PVC Gravity Line (10'-12' Cut) 18. Install 250 linear feet 8" PVC Gravity Line (10'-12' Cut) 19. Install 378 linear feet 8" PVC Gravity Line (8'-10' Cut) 20. Install one (1) 5' Diameter Manhole (14'-16' Deep) 21. Install two (2) 4' Diameter Manhole (12'-14'Deep) 22. Install one (1) 4' Diameter Manhole (10'-12' Deep) 23. Install one (1) 4' Diameter Manhole (8'-10' Deep) 24. One lump sum Pollution Prevention Plan Page 2 of 10 25. Install 2,128 linear feet OSHA Trench Protection 26. Install 84 linear feet 2" HDPE Waterline by Open Cut 27. Install 163 linear feet 2" HDPE Waterline by Boring 28. Install one (1) Water Meter 29. Install one (1) Tie Prop. 2" HDPE Waterline to Exist. Waterline b. The Trunk Line, Force Main and Lift Station must begin at the proposed manhole on the southeast corner of Old Brownsville Road and North Padre Island Drive (SH 358) and extend to proposed wastewater lift station and extend 7,040 linear feet of proposed 6 -inch wastewater force main and continue east and southeast to tie to an existing manhole. c. The plans and specifications must comply with the City's Wastewater Standards Detail Sheets and Standard Specifications. d. Before the Developer/Owner starts construction, the plans and specifications must be approved by the City's Development Services Engineer. 3. SITE IMPROVEMENTS. Prior to the start of construction of the Trunk Line, Force Main and Lift Station, Developer/Owner shall acquire and dedicate to the City the required additional public utility easements ("Easements"), if any, necessary for the completion of the Trunk Line, Force Main and Lift Station. If any of the property needed for the Easements is owned by a third party and the Developer/Owner is unable to acquire the Easements through reasonable efforts, then the City will use its powers of eminent domain to acquire the Easements. 4. PLATTING FEES. Developer/Owner shall pay to the City the required acreage fees and pro - rata fees as required by the UDC for the area of the Trunk Line, Force Main and Lift Station. 5. DEVELOPER/OWNER TO AWARD CONTRACT FOR IMPROVEMENTS. Developer/Owner shall award a contract and complete the Trunk Line, Force Main and Lift Station, under the approved plans and specifications, by May 24, 2017. 6. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in the performance of this contract. 7. PROMPT AND GOOD FAITH ACTIONS. The parties shall act promptly and in good faith in performing their duties and obligations under this Agreement. If this Agreement calls for review or inspections by the City, then the City's reviews or inspections must be completed thoroughly and promptly. 8. DEFAULT. The following events shall constitute default: a. Developer/Owner fails to engage a professional engineer for the preparation of plans and specifications by the 10th calendar day after the date of approval of this Agreement by the City Council. b. Developer/Owner's professional engineer fails to submit the plans and specifications to the City's Director of Engineering Services and to the Development Services Engineer Page 3 of 10 by the 60th calendar day after the date of approval of this Agreement by the City Council. c. Developer/Owner fails to award a contract for the construction of the Trunk Line, Force Main and Lift Station, according to the approved plans and specifications, by the 90th calendar day after the date of approval of this Agreement by the City Council. d. Developer/Owner's contractor does not reasonably pursue construction of the Trunk Line, Force Main and Lift Station under the approved plans and specifications. e. Developer/Owner's contractor fails to complete construction of the Trunk Line, Force Main and Lift Station, under the approved plans and specifications, on or before May 24, 2017. f. Either the City or the Developer/Owner otherwise fails to comply with its duties or obligations under this Agreement. 9. NOTICE AND CURE. a. In the event of a default by either party under this Agreement, the non -defaulting party shall deliver notice of the default, in writing, to the defaulting party stating, in sufficient detail, the nature of the default and the requirements to cure such default. b. After delivery of the default notice, the defaulting party has 15 business days from the delivery of the default notice ("Cure Period") to cure the default. c. In the event the default is not cured by the defaulting party within the Cure Period, then the non -defaulting party may pursue its remedies in this section. d. Should the Developer/Owner fail to perform any obligation or duty of this Agreement, the City shall give notice to the Developer/Owner, at the address stated in section 11, of the need to perform the obligation or duty and, should the Developer/Owner fail to perform the required obligation or duty within 15 days of receipt of the notice, the City may perform the obligation or duty, charging the cost of such performance to the Developer/Owner by reducing the reimbursement amount due to the Developer/Owner. e. In the event of an uncured default by the Developer/Owner, after the appropriate notice and Cure Period, the City has all its common law remedies and the City may: 1. Terminate this Agreement after the required notice and opportunity to cure the default; 2. Refuse to record a related plat or issue any certificate of occupancy for any structure to be served by the project; and/or 3. Perform any obligation or duty of the Developer/Owner under this Agreement and charge the cost of such performance to the Developer/Owner. The Developer/Owner shall pay to the City the reasonable and necessary cost of the performance within 30 days from the date the Developer/Owner receives notice of the cost of performance. In the event the Developer/Owner pays the City under the preceding sentence and is not otherwise in default under this Page 4 of 10 Agreement, then the Agreement shall be considered in effect and no longer in default. f. In the event of an uncured default by the City after the appropriate notice and Cure Period, the Developer/Owner has all its remedies at law or in equity for such default. 10. FORCE MAJEURE. a. The term "force majeure" as employed in this Agreement means and refers to acts of God; strikes, lockouts, or other industrial disturbances; acts of public enemies; insurrections; riots; epidemics; landslides; lightning; earthquakes; fires; hurricanes; storms; floods; washouts; droughts; arrests; civil disturbances; explosions; or other causes not reasonably within the control of the party claiming the inability. b. If, by reason of force majeure, either party is rendered wholly or partially unable to carry out its obligations under this Agreement, then the party claiming force majeure shall give written notice of the full particulars of the force majeure to the other party within ten (10) business days after the occurrence or waive the right to claim it as a justifiable reason for delay. The obligations of the party giving the required notice, to the extent affected by the force majeure, are suspended during the continuance of the inability claimed but for no longer period, and the party shall endeavor to remove or overcome such inability with all reasonable dispatch. 11. NOTICES. a. Any notice or other communication required or permitted to be given under this Agreement must be given to the other party in writing at the following address: 1. If to the Developer/Owner: Peterson Properties, Ltd. attn: Patricia Peterson Nuss, Christy Peterson Brown and James D. Peterson 5830 McArdle, Suite 201 Corpus Christi, Texas 78412 2. If to the City: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Director, Development Services Department 2406 Leopard Street 78401 P. O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 with a copy to: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Assistant City Manager, Business Support Services 1201 Leopard Street 78401 P. O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 Page 5 of 10 b. Notice must be made by United States Postal Service, First Class mail, certified, return receipt requested, postage prepaid; by a commercial delivery service that provides proof of delivery, delivery prepaid; or by personal delivery. c. Either party may change the address for notices by giving notice of the change under the provisions of this section. 12. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY. Developer/Owner's contracts with the professional engineer for the preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of the Trunk Line, Force Main and Lift Station, contracts for testing services, and contracts with the contractor for the construction of the Trunk Line, Force Main and Lift Station must provide that the City is a third party beneficiary of each contract. 13. PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS. Developer/Owner shall, before beginning the work that is the subject of this Agreement, execute a performance bond if the contract is in excess of $100,000 and a payment bond if the contract is in excess of $25,000. The performance and payment bonds must comply with Texas Government Code, Chapter 2253. 14. WARRANTY. Developer/Owner shall fully warranty the workmanship of and function of the Trunk Line, Force Main and Lift Station and the construction of the Trunk Line, Force Main and Lift Station for a period of one year from and after the date of acceptance of the facilities by the City's Director of Engineering Services and Development Services Engineer. 15. REIMBURSEMENT. a. Subject to the conditions for reimbursement from the Sanitary Sewer Trunk System Trust Fund and the appropriation of funds, the City will reimburse the developer, the reasonable actual cost of the Trunk Line, Force Main and Lift Station up to an amount not to exceed $911,341.24 as shown in the attached Exhibit 4, the contents of such exhibit being incorporated by reference into this Agreement. b. The City agrees to reimburse the Developer/Owner on a monthly basis upon invoicing for work performed. The reimbursement will be made no later than 30 days from the date of the invoice. Developer/Owner shall submit all required performance bonds and proof of required insurance under the provisions of this Agreement Exhibit 5. c. To be eligible for reimbursement, the work must be completed in a good and workmanlike manner and must have been inspected and accepted by the City. The City agrees to conduct periodic inspections and approve the progress of the work at key points during construction. d. In the event that this Agreement is terminated by the City as a result of an uncured default by the Developer/Owner and at a time when there has been a partial completion and/or partial payment for the improvements, then the City shall only reimburse the Developer/Owner for its costs that were legitimately incurred towards the completion of the improvements that have been inspected and accepted by the City up to the time that the uncured default occurred. 16. INDEMNIFICATION. DEVELOPER/OWNER SHALL FULLY INDEMNIFY, SAVE, AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, ITS OFFICERS, OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS ("INDEMNITEES") FROM AND AGAINST Page 6 of 10 ALL SUITS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, ACTIONS, LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, LIABILITY, DAMAGES AND JUDGMENTS RECOVERED FROM OR ASSERTED AGAINST CITY FOR ANY AND ALL PROPERTY DAMAGE OR INJURIES SUSTAINED BY ANY PERSON, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, WORKERS' COMPENSATION, PERSONAL INJURY OR DEATH, ARISING FROM OR INCIDENT TO, BE CAUSED BY, OR BE IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH, EITHER PROXIMATELY OR REMOTELY, WHOLLY OR IN PART, THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE TRUNK LINE, FORCE MAIN AND LIFT STATION. 17. COVENANT RUNNING WITH THE LAND. This Agreement is a covenant running with the land, to wit: Westpoint Crossing, Block 1, Lots 1 & 2, a subdivision in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas, and must be recorded in the Official Public Records of Nueces County, Texas. The duties, rights, and obligations of the Agreement are binding on and inure to the benefit of the Developer/Owner's successors or assigns. 18. ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement or any rights under this Agreement may not be assigned by the Developer/Owner to another without the written approval and consent of the City's City Manager. 19. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST. Developer/Owner agrees, in compliance with the City Ordinance No. 17110, to complete, as part of this Agreement, the Disclosure of Interest form attached to this Agreement as Exhibit 6. 20. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Agreement becomes effective and is binding upon and inures to the benefit of the City and the Developer/Owner and their respective heirs, successors, and assigns from and after the date of final execution by all parties. 21. AUTHORITY. The person signing this Agreement on behalf of each of the parties represents, warrants, and guarantees that they have authority to act on behalf of the party and make this Agreement binding and enforceable by their signature. EXECUTED IN ONE ORIGINAL this day of , 20_ Page 7 of 10 ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta Dan McGinn City Secretary Interim Director of Development Services THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES § This instrument was signed by Rebecca Huerta, City Secretary, for the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, and acknowledged before me on the day of 2016. Notary Public, State Of Texas THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES § This instrument was signed by Dan McGinn, Interim Development Services Director, for the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, and acknowledged before me on the day of , 2016. Notary Public, State Of Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM: , 2016. Assistant City Attorney For the City Attorney Page 8 of 10 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF § § § OWNER: Peterson Properties, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership By: Patricia Peterson Nuss, General Partner This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 2016, by Patricia Peterson Nuss, General Partner, Peterson Properties, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership, on behalf of said partnership. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF § § § Notary Public's Signature OWNER: Peterson Properties, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership By: Christy Peterson Brown, General Partner This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 2016, by Christy Peterson Brown, General Partner, Peterson Properties, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership, on behalf of said partnership. Notary Public's Signature Page 9 of 10 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF OWNER: Peterson Properties, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership By: Patricia Peterson Nuss, General Partner This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 2016, by James D. Peterson, General Partner, Peterson Properties, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership, on behalf of said partnership. Notary Public's Signature Page 10 of 10 Notes' 1.) Total platted area contains 35.41 acres of land. (Includes Street Dedication) 2.) The receiving water for the storm water runoff from this property is the Oso Creek. The TCEQ has not classified the aquatic life use for the Oso Creek. but it is recognized as an environmentally sensitive area. The Oso Creek flows directly into the Oso Bay. The TCEO has classified the aquatic life use for the Oso Bay a*exceptional" and "oyster watere" and categorized the receiving water as "contact recreation` use. 3.) Bearings based on CPS, NAD83, State Plane Coordinate System, Texas South Zone 4205. 4.) By graphic plotting only, this property is in Zone "C" on Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 485464 0165 C, City of Corpus Christi, Texas, which bears on effective date of July 23, 1971 and is not in a Special Flood Hazard Area. 5.) If any lot is developed with residential u ompliance with the open space regulation will be required during the build ng permit phase. 6.) Wastewater improvements provided by service agreement, filed and recorded in Document No Official Public Records of Nueces County, Texas. State of Texas County of Nueces, Peterson Properties, Ltd.. a Texas Limited Partnership, hereby certifies that it is the of the lands embraced within the boundaries of the foregoing plat: that it hashad said lands surveyed and subdivided as shown: that streets shown ore dedicated in fee simple, to the public use forever, that aasols as shown are dedicated to the public use for the installation, operation and a of public utilities; one that this mop was mode for the purpose of description and dedication. This the day of 20 0y Ry Patricia Peterson Nuss, General Partner Chris Ann Peterson Brown, General 00010¢1 By. James D. Peterson, General Partner State of Texas County of Nueces Th. instrument was acknowledged before me by Patricia Peterson Puss, Chris Ann Peterson Brownaes d JamD. Peterson, as General Partners of Peterson Properties. Ltd.. a Texas Limited Partnership, on behalf of said partnership. This the day of 20 - Notary Public In and for the State of Texas YAR - 9 2016 D PLANNING COMMISSION Plat of Westpoint Crossing Block 1, Lots 1 and 2 3541 Acres of Land being portions of Lots 9 through 11, and portions of Lots 14 through 15, Section 5 Range 1411, of the Cugenheim & Cohn's farm Lots, a Map of which is recorded in Volume A Page 54 Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, Accts 1-9 2-9 3-8 and Tract 9 MM Gabriel Land, o map of which is recorded in Volume 2, Page 22, Misoe/loneous Mop Records of Nueces County, Texas a 9.980 Acre Tracy described as Tract 11 conveyed in a warranty deed from Patricia Roy Peterson /hiss to Peterson Properties, LTD., a Tema limited partnership recorded in Document Number 837113, Officio/ PutBc Records of Nueces County, Texas, a 2.083 Acre Tract conveyed in a warranty deed from Page 2. Gabriel and wife, Virginia Ma Gabriel to Gulfway Shopping Center Inc. recorded in Volume 1310, Page 177, Deed Records of Nueces County, Texas, and all of a 0.446 Mrs Tract conveyed in a Warranty Deed from 2.7 Gabriel and lee, Wanda Gabriel to Roy Peterson recorded in Volume 904 Page 352, Deed Records of Nueces County, Tera. State oTexas County of Nueces 15is final plat of the herein described property was approved by the Department of Development Services of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. This the day of 20 Ratna Poltumu00, PE, DEED AP Development Services Engineer State of Texas County of Nueces Thee final plat of the herein described property was approved on behalf of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas by the Planning Commission. This the day of 20 Daniel McGinn, Interim Secretary Philip J. Ramirez, 0.1A., LEER AP, Chairman State of Texas County of Nueces I. Kara Sands, Clerk of the County Court In and for said County, do hereby certify that the foregoing instrument dated the _ day of 20 with its certificate f authentication w flied for record in my office the _ day of 20 At O'clock _____ and duly recorded the _ day of 20 at _ O'clock _A., In said County In volume - Page Map Records. 1Ntnes0 my hand and seal of the County Court, In and for sold County, at office in Corpus Christi, Texas, the day and 0500 lost written. riled far Record at 0'c10ck 20 Karo Sands. County 016rk Nueces County, Texas By Deputy State of Texas County of Nueces I, James D. Carr. a Registered Profe®ianal Land Surveyor for Urban Engineering, have prepared the foregoing map from aey made on the ground under my direction and is true and correct to the hest of my knowledge, irvnformation a en belief; I have beengaged under contract to set all Lot and Block comers s shown herein and and complete such operations with due and reasonable diligence consistent with sound professional practice. This the _ day of 20 James. D. an, R.PLS. Texas License No. fi45B LE'URBAN\SCAL January 27, 2016 SCALE: ,•_,DO• ENGINEERING JOB NO.: 40706.86.00 ` www 00 w.ww 11 EPoems SHEET: 1 of 2 / DRAWN BY: %G Exhibit 1 Page 1 of 2 Plat of Westpoint Crossing Block 1, Lots 1 and 2 3541 Acres of Land being portions of Lots 9 through 11, and portions of Lots 14 through 15 Section 5, Range 98 of the Gugenheim & Cohn's FOIM LotS, o Map of whiell is recorded in 5 Warne A, Page 53 Map Records of Nueres C01/550 Texas,_ Tracts 1-5 2-8, 3-5' and Trost 6, U.M. Gabriel Land, e rsaP of which 10 recorded in Volume 2, Page 25 Miscellaneous Mop _Records of Musses Coun0,, Texas, a 0.985 Acre Tract described as Tract conveyed in a warranOt deed from Patricia Roy Peterson Noss to Peterson Properties, L772, a Texas lirnited partnership recorded in Document Number 837113, Official Public Records of Nueces CounOt, Texas, a 2.083 Acre Tract conveyed in a worronty deed f IOM Page J. Gabriel and wife, Virginia Mae Gabriel to Gulfway Shopping Center Inc. recorded in Volume 1310, Page 17Z Deed Records of Nueces Counfr, Texas, and all of a 0.446 Acre Tract conveyed in a Werra* Deed from J.V. Gable/ and wife, Wanda Gabriel to Ray E Peterson recorded in Volume 903 Page 352, Deed Records of Nueces Cour*, Texas. LMIS - 9 h16 PLANNING COMMISSION (8800) micrid5 • Fd. 5/8 irech iron rod ivith red plastic cop stamped 'Urban Engr C.C. Tx. 0 gel 5/8 inch iron rod isith red plastic Pap stomped Engr C.C. Tn. O Found TOOT Monument Moo 5 • Found 2 1/2 MCP Iron 088 - 011getttlettil Cohnis Farm Lots - Gabriel Lands Tracts 1.642 Acres -h-nool e1E uneAr.eDATE: January 27. 2016 Ariu F. 1*=100. ENGINEERING JOB NO.: 40705.85.00 unTwrTi'"=7.7.,:lrt„„, SHEET: 2 of 2 4A. ^....,-.. A.A.A,A. .A DRAWN BY: 00 ,,,,,....,..A.........,...,,o,,,,Am.,.,. Exhibit 1 Page 2 of 2 4 APPLICATION FOR WASTE WATER REIMBURSEMENT We, Peterson Properties, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership, whose address is P.O. Box 8229, Corpus Christi, Texas 78468, owners and developers of proposed Westpoint Crossing, Block 1, Lots 1 and 2, hereby request reimbursement of $ 911,341 24 forthe installation of the waste water 8" and 10" PVC SDR26 sanitary sewer pipe in conjunction with said lot, as provided for by City Ordinance No. 17396. $246,351.45 is the construction cost, including 11.5% Engineering and Surveying, as shown by the cost supporting documents attached herewith. Patricia Peterson Nuss General Partner THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES )„ This instrument was acknowledged before me on �'� h Lc Patricia Peterson Nuss, General Partner of Peterson Properties, Lt a Texas limited artnership, on behalf of the said partnership. Dat , 2016, by Notkr ublic in and • r the State o Texas Chris rson Brown General Partner 47' ?i Date THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES § This instrument was acknowledged before me on c1/t. 2016, by Chris Ann Peterson Brown, General Partner of Peterson Properties, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership, on behalf of the said partnership. JUANA JEAN BARTON My Commission Expel June 3. 2017 ► bln and for the ` tate of Texas Exhibit 2 Page 1 of 4 J: - r . Peterson Ge Partner 3 Da [ay,“,otni F. THE STATE OF 3ggFE § Seti,A-o. '26W,r b COUNTY OFAIIMW § This instrument was acknowledged before me on hi-a-rG� y it/ , 2016, by James D. Peterson, General Partner of Peterson Properties, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership, on behalf of the said partnership. CARLOS ALBERTO ARREOLA R0911I09E2 Commission it 2110218 Holary Public - Calilertaia Santa Barbara County My Comm, Explras Jul 4.2019 s Mow i:a V -n L(' I Public i(and for the State ofd 6aSt CERTIFICATION The information submitted with this application for reimbursement has been reviewed and determined to be correct. Reimbursement is subject to: (a) Sufficiency of funds in the Collection Line Trust Fund, and (b) Appropriation and approval by the City Council. Development Services Engineer (Date) Exhibit 2 Page 2of4 APPLICATION FOR WASTE WATER CREDIT We, Peterson Properties, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership, whose address is P.O. Box 8229, Corpus Christi, Texas 78468, owners and developers of proposed Westpoint Crossing, Block 1, Lots 1 and 2, hereby apply for $55,629.11 credit towards the waste water acreage fee for the waste water 8" and 10" PVC SDR26 sanitary sewer pipe in conjunction with said subdivision as provided for by City Ordinance No. 17396. $246,351.45 is the construction cost, including 11.5% Engineering and Surveying, as shown by the cost supporting documents attached herewith. Tui Patricia Peters Nuss Date General Partner THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES This instrument was acknowledged before me on3 , 2016, by Patricia Peterson Nuss, General Partner of Peterson Properties, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership, on behalf of the said partnership. JUANA JEAN BARTON My Commission Expires f June 3, 2017 44, Public in anor the State of Texas Chris Ann Peterson town General Partner 3 3 Date THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NUECES § This instrument was acknowledged before me on 6VLLil 3 2016, by Chris Ann Peterson Brown, General Partner of Peterson Properties, Ltd., a Texas limited the said partnership. JUANA JEAN BARTON My Commission Expires June 3, 2017 Public in an r the State oftexas Exhibit 2 Page 3 of 4 Peterson ral Partner Date LcrIL. �. THE STATE OFA § COUNTY OF %tbu•lu4§ This instalment was acknowledged before me on Mixi.. L -tL , 2016, by James D. Peterson, General Partner of Peterson Properties, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership, on behalf of the said partnership. taffy Publictn and for the State of Milk Litaictw. & Exhibit 2 CARLOS ALBERTO ARREOLA RODRIG1JEZ Commission M 2111248 i Holm Public - Cdllornls Santa Batbali County My Comm. Esplles Jo14, 2019 Page 4 of 4 CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR WEST POINT CROSSING SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI BAY ENGINEER: URBAN ENGINEERING CONSULTING ENGINEER 2725 SWANTNER ST. CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, 78404 PROJECT LOCATION MAP SCALE: N.T.5. Exhibit 7 SHEET INDEX SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION I. TITLE SHEET AND INDEX 2. BASIS OF DESIGN J. KEY MPP 4. AREA MAP FOR FORCE AWN 5. FORCE MAIN PUN AND PROFILES STA. 0+00 THRU STA 8+00 6. FORCE MAIN PLN AND PROFILES STA 8+00 THRU STA ,B+00 T. FORCE MAIN PLN AND PROFILES STA. 18+00 THRU STA. 26+00 B. FORCE MAIN PLN AND PROFILES STA 28+00 THRU STA. 38+00 9. FORCE MAIN PLAN AND PROFILES STA. 38+00 THRU STA 48+00 10. FORCE MAIN PLN AND PROFILES STA. 48+00 THRU STA 58+00 11. FORCE MAIN PLN AND PROFILES STA. 58+00 THRU END 12. UR STATION SITE PIAN 13. UFT STATION DIMENSION PIAN 14. UFT STARON SECTION AND DETAILS IS UR STATION ELECTRICAL 16. AREA MAP FOR GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER 12. GRAVITY SEWER PIAN AND PROFILES STA. 0+00 THRU STA. 20+00 18. GRAM SEWER PIAN AND PROFILES STA. 20+00 THRU END 19. WATER SERVICE PUN THE FOLLOWING TZDOT STANDARDS SHEETS SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED BELOW HAVE BEEN SELECTED BY ME OR UNDER MY RESPONSIBLE SUPERVISION AS BEING APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT. 20. SAFETY END TREATMENT PE CORPUS CHRISTI PNY STANMROS MTAll5 CITY STANDARDS SANITARY SEWER CITY STANDARDS SANITARY SEWER (2) CITY STANDARDS SANITARY SEWER (J) CITY STANDARDS SANITARY SEWER (4) COY STANDARDS SANITARY SEWER (5) CRY STANDARDS WATER .TAILS CITY STANDARDS WATER DETAILS (2) CITY STANDARDS WATER DETAILS (3) CITY STANDARDS WATER DRAWS (4) TY STANDARDS WATER DETAILS (5) Digitally signed by Rana Yottumutbu, CEyL4 Corpus Christi, EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. BY :"P'16,7 MURRAY F. HUDSON, P.E. CALL BEFORE YOU 00! MI IC URBAN I ENGINEERING JOB NO. 40706.B4.01 DATE: MARCH 2015 1 of rnOF 20 i / �I. 58.11 ac. PHASE I ' LFT STATION it" jt 7.03 ac.— i' _a It it 45.00 ac. ♦• a/ ♦ - PHASE f \�� 14.94 eo.♦♦� SERVICE ; • • ^♦ • tc1 ♦♦ r ♦ ♦ a t t t'I clwxaEo ToS‘ 21.31 ac. ♦s .' PHASE I =1 \ 1S(1/ ---SERVICE AREA /.."01‘ Barr l14 pc. PHASE 1 ♦ a 1 EI LFT STATION ♦, L \ 8.75 as I '‘ 8.14 ea. I • s.I O _ME - MOM MMS =G� N r 72.35 ac. BASIS OF DESIGN Fxhihit 7 West Point Area - Phase !Lift Station Flow Calculations 44 30 ,00 Phase 111.1ft Ratan Flow Caleulatlons Aer0153 La Um 43x13lrm100011 rw am vnnemla 310 9 I 3011 CommertIal 35 lee 111111 1 1 NOTE: LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND WASTE WATER FLOWS ARE FROM UN—ADOPTED WASTE WATER MASTER PLAN FOR SUBJECT AREA. PHASE I LIFT STATION (INTERIM): 8' DIAMETER WET WELL 2 EA. 5HP 480V PUMPS 1-6" FORCE MAIN PHASE I LIFT STATION (FUTURE): 8' DIAMETER WET WELL 2 EA. 35HP 480V PUMPS 1-6" FORCE MAIN NOTE: CURRENT DEVELOPMENT PLANS ONLY COVERS SOUTH EAST CORNER OF OLD BROWNSVILLE ROAD AND S.P.I.D. WHICH WILL FACILITATE CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE I LIFT STATION. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT WILL DICTATE NEED AND TIMING FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE II LIFT STATION. • CALL BEFORE YOU 010! T0,0 —010-001-51511 Digitally sla ed by Patna ap Chnstl I ImSa m LEGEND IIx MOT afseoaPL PmuP uasm icsowlw I= war mvmaw I I �5feLE Psagg 5 BASIS OF DESIGN Z Z W �y Z_ Ii C7 7Z W • SHEET 2 OF JQ fool 2O'9,,y Digitally signed db A Rana n nu, 9�4 A eaa st XPi a _ WESTPROPOSED ROAD FORCE o �- AREA MAP — PROPOSED GRAVITY SYSTEM AND PROPOSED FORCE MAIN 5, 300 Exhibit 9 PROPOSED GRAM WPM' SEWER • FROPOSED ▪ LOW DIRECTION AR 1.1101.E 11.14-05.00. CALL BEFORE YOU OIG! MOVILAWN GOWN, ��ae� zao 11111111 a 2 W 3 OF 1.4 .r� Pamdawii ^4a SHEE a' <ytip o� pP — � WEST PO NI i ROAO Y SHEET 7 SHEET 8 SHEET 9 I Al 444 WI It lir aa` mI Or min imam a mow so sr. =MIAimME::MNNM MEM �M M� �� M ria =ME MI= MEM MEM M MI=MIMI=MI NM MEM MI MEM MEM MI um MNI= =NM MEM MUM MMI =IN MEMMEM MEM M� MUM MEM == MIMI MI MEM 1=1MUNI MUNIMEM MEM .� .0 C. M Z. ZMIME pm ► lC 11116 a. naly:goed by Rana S.Pottumalw, naS. o,LlevebPment a, Corpus Chris% MEND - PROPOSED FORCE WIN —59— PROPOSED DRAM MOM' SEM ma man ME NMI NM IMM 1 XI1 SHEET AREA MAP - PROPOSED FORCE MAIN Exhibit 7 CALL BEFORE YOU DIC! 669-.4 f 1111111 01111111 SHEET 4 o JOB O. 8 ct Ciwwtypptt��f ar it °Z17.== Digitally signed by Ratna S. Pottumuthu, P.E. DN: cr=Ratna S. Pottumuthu, o=Development Services, ou=City of Corpus Christi, email=atnap@cctcxas.com, (=US Date: 2015.642411:1249 -0550' Portia- F.c [11111111 /11111111 w J O O SCO d Z ~ 604 Q 2 d 1_ Z O Q + � O w1- = N 0 LL o 24 40 PLAN VIEW NPR: ALL. PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER FORCE AWN SHALL BE MEN, PVC C-900 12B$1 PRE550RE CLASS 165. SEE FORCE AWN PIPING SPECIFICATION FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. PLAN VIEW LEGEND gni ?ionfAra.55,Er cxnnwwnmr vuvc �� c CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! aamigata dffi�. -mow& 811 1-2C0- d14.1 0+00 1.0 4+00 5 00 PROFLE VIEW a< m_`'Fvhihi4 7 6 00 0+00 EXISTING U ILRIES SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. imillam mlmi f\MCA09 i mamiamma imomaumm -_���__ IMI 1.E''-------'3F13IIIMM, Ef_11M------_.M 8 ct Ciwwtypptt��f ar it °Z17.== Digitally signed by Ratna S. Pottumuthu, P.E. DN: cr=Ratna S. Pottumuthu, o=Development Services, ou=City of Corpus Christi, email=atnap@cctcxas.com, (=US Date: 2015.642411:1249 -0550' Portia- F.c [11111111 /11111111 w J O O SCO d Z ~ 604 Q 2 d 1_ Z O Q + � O w1- = N 0 LL o 24 40 PLAN VIEW NPR: ALL. PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER FORCE AWN SHALL BE MEN, PVC C-900 12B$1 PRE550RE CLASS 165. SEE FORCE AWN PIPING SPECIFICATION FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. PLAN VIEW LEGEND gni ?ionfAra.55,Er cxnnwwnmr vuvc �� c CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! aamigata dffi�. -mow& 811 1-2C0- d14.1 0+00 1.0 4+00 5 00 PROFLE VIEW a< m_`'Fvhihi4 7 6 00 0+00 EXISTING U ILRIES SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 0 �$ ',r w'gcroeF . BY ,.., rewsm,uwr IM . „rom sgnedn,Patna s. 1 vsTy1 acWscn.Ke �., �v�ro3.'� �., Date: WEST PONT ROAD 8.8 888 PLAN VIEW NEE: ALL PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER FORCE AWN SHALL BE 6@1, PJC 0-900 0525, PRESSURE CLASS 165. SEE FORCE AWN PIPING SPECIFICATION FOR ADDIRONAL INFORMATION. • CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! MOON Irti SIAR 87888, .30.1188. COVER 28 PROPOSED 8. EOM 8800 10+00 13+00 1.188 PROFLE VIEW :"'vhihi+ 7 15. 16 00 17 00 EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 18+00 arua..Fi 5 0 9 LLI CC 19 • CO CC Z" z -Luc' re z 7w 1 SHEET 6 OF 2Q f .a Digitally signed by Rana 5. Pottumuthu, P.E. telopme,rcmmumu, Services, ucity of Corpus Christi, maikratnappcctexas.com PLAN VEW SCALE 1.060. ICE: AIL PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER FORCE AWN SHALL BE SIREN. PVC C-900 12825PRESSURE CLASS 165. SEE FORCE WIN PIPING SPECIFICATION FOR AODIDONAL INFORMATION. LEGEND Ewa EOSTINC WATER VALVE 15''Ir. EASEMENT N.E)UGRIC STORMDOMINO ORMAGE DITCH ROW UNE CALL BEFORE YOU DIO11 ME MC SOP 18.00 21.5 22 00 23 00 PROFLE VIEW Fiftr 2.00 25 00 28 00 EXISTING UDLRIES SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 37 00 SHEET 7 OF _2,S1 Pao -741f a°, MIEMIMITEM 1111=1; Eilliaireo I .5•11M11 0 IMIL Lffl/IIN��— 01 - ' 1.1K\�'..�UAL-- . . . - ----� N MM11111111M5711Mlb•- I- -K- \ EllingI/--6—his------- 0 -144. 'Et? ,AI.• __ _. T511M1 I– M Irna�:,, •,�-.+,t.�+r=-ae- itil?tom------ a 18.00 21.5 22 00 23 00 PROFLE VIEW Fiftr 2.00 25 00 28 00 EXISTING UDLRIES SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 37 00 SHEET 7 OF _2,S1 Pao -741f a°, PLAN VIEW BM ALL PROPOSED SWART SEWER FORCE MAIN SHALL BE MEE PVC C-900 ThR25. PRESSURF CLASS 199. SEE FORCE MAIN PIPING SPECIFICATION FOR ADDRIONAL INFORNADON. 1.EGEISD ?, =L `— RCS KIE,To s" """ alTa "" ETZ =MA.. EASOAEXT (U.E.) 'Pg& E"11 EN112 CAS UNE 1.12111 MER OPIC .13LE UNE ENZ Eranz-,-.ErIE METING MINIM, ELECTRIC, CAI! BEFORE YOU DIG! 147217=1: mimeo •••••••1101no. IXE LORE SIM Sis ,..0.0,0706,11.01,PUNS,107.0813001_11.10,P1.1,5..p...e.mod er Cr, , PROFILE VIEW Fmk 14fiff' rEXISIING UTILMES SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 5 d. Zz ul wffi z6 I I 011 FE1 SHEET 8 OF1Q JOB Pcjaa-R-4-4 7ig93' EXISIINC MOE ,,,,, ,,,,,,,, , ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, —,,,,,,,,,,,,,, , • , ,,,,,,,,,,, ,77,,,,,,,,,,,,, .7,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 30. 10N. COMER 0 C, \ 32 • CO CO PROP02£0 fr Iv. ..e 1-- 20 28 W 7 I— ..0 I— § M 20 20 Sis ,..0.0,0706,11.01,PUNS,107.0813001_11.10,P1.1,5..p...e.mod er Cr, , PROFILE VIEW Fmk 14fiff' rEXISIING UTILMES SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 5 d. Zz ul wffi z6 I I 011 FE1 SHEET 8 OF1Q JOB Pcjaa-R-4-4 7ig93' Digitally signed by Ratna S. Pottumuthu, P.E. th DN: cn=Rama S. egR Pottumuthu,P.E., . o\ D velapment Services, F.... City of Corpus Chrsti,. ail=ratn apacctexas.co Date: 015.04.2411:22:53 PLAN VEW N07E: ALL PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN SHALL BE GREEN INC 5-900 5625 PRESSURE CLASS 165. SEE FORCE MAN PIPING SPECIFICATION FOR ADDTOONAL INFORMATION. I EGEND MEMO MIER VALVE FTZE w xl REIg MISTING OMR OMIC CAME UNE MING OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL CALL BEFORE YOU 0/0! IrEffrim AT 1-eib-665-831. 10 PROFLE VIEW P3diffilf9 EXISTING UTILRIES SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. Z" z 65 W W Z 710 1 1 1 9 OF1Q P 4-4f100 OnoPO4Lw It M-600 six owo lii\�P.vti nutmm ... .. .� • u4 \Pn�....me CA ;a• m CO y + non MMED m 7 = PROFLE VIEW P3diffilf9 EXISTING UTILRIES SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. Z" z 65 W W Z 710 1 1 1 9 OF1Q P 4-4f100 oI S?' CO CO rn gl §I NORTH PADRE ISLAND DRIVE , DigRallysigned byxama S. Yolturtattl, Ilttcn,Natna S. ou,ityolCorpusChnsti, email=ratna wm:m.wpcctexas z 01123,12 ACCESS ROAD r`7.7 mx.0 0 a PLAN VEW 1 6Q7E: ALL PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER FORCE NNN SHALL BE C$EEH. PVC C-900 DB25, PRESSURE CLASS 165 SEE FORCE MAIN PIPING SPECIFICATION FOR ADDIPONAL INFORMATION. LEGEND Rat NErnInggr NG MIEN UNE NG SWART SEWER POSED FOTE NEM ringOnglInt'K .nnlon ORN.GEZORGN FLOW UNE CALL BEFORE YOU 010! 1-800-694 Sep PROFLE VEW scTiggi it 2 EXISTING UTILGIES SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUQTION. 40 -ca Z" Z W W Z 0 7W SHEET 10 or2Q f .a °a, z rxaiixs caoP PLAN VIEW NQIE: 411 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN SHALL BE GREEN. PVC C-900 GB21 PRESSURE CLASS I65,. SEE FORCE MAIN PIPING SPECIF1CA71ON FOR ADDR1ONAL INFORMATION. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. LEGEND 0FEZ "ao' A — WATER UNE 0.10.1 raec ,1 STOP 50.5 LIRE ELECTRICAL ND arc Digitally signed by Ratna 5. Pottumuthu, P.E. DN: cn=Rain 5. Pottumuthu, PE, o=Development Services, oudity of Corpus Christi, email=ratnap@cctexas.co r -U5 Date: 2015.04.241123:32 -05 oD CALL BEFORE YOU 010! 811 Ar 30+00 50+00 327. 60+00 81+00 .00 63,00 PROFLE VIEW FIchillif 2 66+00 07+00 Z" Z w w z 7w ° 11 OF ZQ Patio 44 -cif AZ awrFt lArSrd SWIM -qls �.,�, �, �� ar ar. ,III II 311013 CONNECTOR 26 II z Z I I = za S. I :a sp o 20a 30+00 50+00 327. 60+00 81+00 .00 63,00 PROFLE VIEW FIchillif 2 66+00 07+00 Z" Z w w z 7w ° 11 OF ZQ Patio 44 -cif AZ DoNaeW 1.£%^•ro 12 0F2Q 3 CONTRACTOR 15 RESPOMBIE FOR MAMMON OF WV DRNMAY mum COORDMIE WEN INIUMEIMAN Tozrema fA' SFA, DFTAII NFW CONC TO NF CONC O. TO INSTA11 ARDN STFPs. OF ME gam A DEM. EOM TO T•C0 OFWE GP RuSEAL PROPOSED ' METER SANITARY SEIMR IAANKAE A-1 fgA 5len no ass twN a ONE NAN. GRAM IDIOM uo muo �o¢ne'x 1 SECURE ••••Srw¢ /MERE TO TNE . OF GP SEAL SENT P Wvwnr ••••u MOUE MM.! OR vA ANT SEMI.. U., IMPROPER COMCOMM WY MISE 01X.0 OP MEMDAS CONCUR SWAN 331 E won RACK SPROPOSED WOOD MKT awn WIREar nc NOR TIRE M P� l/ 3 i — EOM GS UNE SHEET NOTES/ IS PROVIDED. 10. PROPOSED ROW METER SP.ISOR. Rotnr SHAWL TO SCAD MN PANEL CALL BEFORE YOU DIC! STIR EXISTING YTILTIIES SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR T LOCATIONS IN THF EL �RI{HORIZONTAL CONSTRUCTION. � .9 VERTICAL Dahostuatir Digitallysign•d by aatna S. -CM of Corpus Christ,ssco Date. 2015.0,20 112355 THINGS TO AVOID• DUMB, KAMMe1. ava. MS. COND. WADE CONOME WE MOT .046 INF GP SELL SCRM RAL.°110, TE ONCREIE REINFO oCE}. WNTT OFTAII -ENERu N0FOR ON RET EN PA YT I. ALL REINFORCING STEEL LAPS SHALL BE 30 EARS OMETE: .FRE 11,E RONFORCIND SI._ IS NOT TO BE COMTINNOUS. GRADE , CVSS 25 USES TAG AND O. WM BE USED IN ALL CON:AC,„1.1 REINFO NG STEEL WALL BE SUPPORTED CURING CONSTRUCEON ETE FOR ALL B. BLOCK CURB MALL SE Fxhihit 2 Mian¢ MEM PROPERTY UNE eas.c MIRY - RO oWO uam;� EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ME FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! mosey Al I- 809-669,341 z J IFT STATION DIMENSION SHEET 13 OF 2Q Pages of 2 PLAN VIEW AT GRADE ELEVATION—DUPLEX NOT TO SCALE CONCRETE PIPE SUPPORT Lr_ WET WELL TOP SLAB STEEL CONFIGURATION LEL PROPOSED LiTNOM MOOToMP n"oM � W tN epic) O TPS om a n�vu1 OnTOT). cwaa, PSC.= LP STATEN PPP •T pm) mann PUMPS . ..vv. ORME MPS To SE MT wmi, znDOOM.. 35.: "nmTel IMPELLER. /11 =CRP PIT SER-TOOD Pa EPP 1103.11 ORR/COPT ma 0.15 T) TnA Tam EPP PPM oTo3 IR ROMP OR COPP 1/2, REP SIP BE 4,ES BO ITO TED AT EP PPOIL PETRI SPJCES, ROOM ROLL CMLL"BE 11.01:40 MAT TA= SOL NOT FE 5. ILL RP PROP PPP SOLI TIE RAMP NE PRO WALL Or Di OOP opaY� �09 affilm[oRPa ROT TLog, oT. TO TO IA ILL SWOP MEL IPS Pa/ LE 11,E TIC ru AMPS xm vassm,s neu BB, SMALL g srm.e. ¢On Tuna �-K cw p -0'l iew Digitally signed by Patna S. Pottumuthu, P.E. Pottumuthu,P.E, o=Deielopment Services, ou=City of Corpus Christi, mail=ratnap( RIXas.0 orn,c=l1S Date: 2015.0929 1129:12-0,00' PEREIPATION TOMO. (TOP TT SKS maw TEMP IP WIPP Pvhihit 9 sar Pn(114.14.41 NI z 0 1-0) Q 0)1— w LL J Z ¢Q Q Z O Lu w co 14 SHEET 0 CALMED CONNECTOR 10000NG FPNFA 404/0/60+ a WWE AP ME.0 IalNsyned Iletna5. 1444.4,114Ina Pot-M.O. lopment r 44.4.44,,,,„,„,icxymRe < pus Crls0, RE ,145 TO AEP 5 ADA DONDUN COO ENCLOSUR UP.uiPPPVC (5CH 40) 4FW 4X oAR SEAL xPM PUMP ow AIM CONDUIT TRANSITION DETAL PANEL 12 - SCHEDULE 1100 AMP. LMNE oAPAD29�3:WIMfAATOIIPimC� TO AL LOAD LOAD - H45E ” 8 5 VA SERVICE: 12 /240 VAC i -PRISE, 3 YAFE 5 kVA LOAD - PRASE'' 2,025 VA SOURCE' TRWYOWE4 ME SI2E SERVICE VA .0 ERR. S. BRII. SUE VA WM IMRE S1WE 20A E 20A 1,000 SMART° 12 2,11 RECEPTALLL 20A A 10 I 20A A 204 E 20A am 16 19 20A 13 20A 22 204 TO BE KAKI= 0RK 1 ASSOCIAIEO WITH SCADA STALLSTALLBE x HP____;,SUBCONTRACTED ED TO AND PERFORMED 405Bf: Fu ss Fln_LB 1R4_42 1134_42 CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM AND PROVIDE ALL CONDUIT AND WIRING AS REQUIRED FOR A FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM. 1 I 1 11 LASS nDl -451 RIBNNS Ih E INC. 200 UP RIVER ROAD CORPUS CHRIST, TX. 18010 (211) 242-5121 R. SCAN WORK INCLUDES NSTALA0ION OF ALL ASSOCIATED SCAM EQUIPMENT. INSTALATON OF NEW RTU AND ANTENNA INSTALLATION PUMPNNA CCOONTROL PAAU WIRWO AND TERMINATEN G NEL PLC PROGRAMMING AND UPDATING H I IND GRAPHICS AT env MONITORING STIR, SYSTEM FUNCTNIN LEST COMPLETE WAIN I YEAR WARRANTY NTV,WWIT'"' ELECTRICAL QUFWILNIffitg2 I CEPIACII OPPLES MY. 444116 saws OWPELn0 MOUNT GAS .1. F BowI. OOS 0444 RAWER QNRCNT WONT (MOT MOUNT) SH MND SHUT NOVO. 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ELECTRICAL PEWIT FOR INSTARATION OF DIE NEW ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO THE PROPOSED 050 STATION SIZE 2. ONTPACIOR TO COORDINATE WITH ORE FIELTRIC COMPANY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE NEW 480V SIXNCE TO 1HE PROPOSED UFT STATION SITE. CONTRACTOR TO PRDWDE ALL WT1RWS AND EQUIPMENT AS REWIRED BY THE ELECTRIC COMPANY, CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED FOR NEW ELECTRICAL SERVICE 3. GROUND TNG SHALL 40 PER 0100 COMP0 SERVICE RA.0 IS PER ELECTRIC COAPANY REQUIREMENTS. 4. NTP65TOR TO INSTAL AWN SERVICE DISCONNECT SWTCH IN NEW 4X S.S. ENCLOSURE. 5. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL NEW CCA TREATED ELECTRICAL EWPMEM RACK AND MOUNT ON ALL NEw EQUIPMENT WM 318 S.S. HARDWIRE. 6. ALL FASTENERS AND ANCHOR BOLTS TO BE 316 STAINLESS STEL 7. ELECTMCAL SUBCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8. PROVIDE SPACE IN CONTROL PANEL FOR FUTURE SIZE 3 STARTERS. 9. PUMP CONTROL PMOL TO BE PROMO BY PUMP SUPPLIER AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. T� FLOAT SEQUENC( DIAGRAM U 4 awu0 Acv. 05 PUMP2ONE.2` D,S PUMP 1 ON REV. 21z ,5 PUMPS OFT „///„/,NMP�QAM Pacie45-(a LIFT STATION ELECTRICAL Z0 z W W z W SHEET 15 OF 2Q 300 iNiwo Pacta.AEac 0400, STA O� ST POINT ROC o,P 114' MN Illrs.4IAEN4 °31,= X0I im =► q= =� ......... MN MI MIMMEM�- -. aim min = — - -- mom -- — — mom mi= mom imEN MIN EE mum NI — CC �C - -- MC MINN MEM MM. -- : 7: — =BM= = UMC C- MEM MEM MI �M MEM EMNM= MIMIMIME M•P' 11ET FGEND - PROPOSED NY1101.3 - PROPOSE, RPM WM FIVOSED GMT' WWI 051102 Paoqtallystonedby Development nn __La— C C� C= AREA MAP — GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER Pvhihit 9 CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! r�w..aIBPAs.:3B 10313 30A 1-300-669-8344 11111111 nhluuuu' 11 H >- > Er <cc C7 w W cc Oco Mz wcc� 16 OF 7Si J.: NO. .�i01 NI fr ft „— ,_1.; �`a _ :ate . fi.< s _8�, _ � { 10. A I1. nw,.m 0 .,m u.x i PLAN VIEW LINEA' UNE 10 w 1,00. WALL MOM, I— GRAVITY SEWER LINE 'A' PLAN & PROFLE i i ! f , ill i: o E2 ce 1'=s° vwr la 0,m 1100 x m s000 s.o0 000 1140 100 1313.00 «m W --ate.. -. ,._� a ,: . w w Q I E%ISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL v. OLD BROWNSVILLE ROAD , I ¢O > I Q 0_ ❑ al LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ao a ,arc I I - ❑ gP sc c1rv. 'n �.rc Saxe n e vr<uxe '-,, _ ^ Zo .— _ �sn -- Zg� o easn m 0� 101 J PLAN VIEW LINE 'A' 413. 10 -, RAM ARE REUSED FOR 424 R0 ...� m `,.rs . .•.x,. Le/ELEMENT SERVICES URBAN ENGINEERING � A 4� €E @pg_ 9g� ¢ $ � x 111 ,„e.w-. ..a/ m b. Rama S /�.. . Pottumuthu, P DN: m=Ratna 5. Pottumuthu, PE., 00 a=Development 5ervices,ou=city of Corpus Christi, email=ratnap@cctexascom, r—U5 Date: 2015.042411:2707-05'00' / R2 fps CALLBEFORE YOU DIG! 1T OF PROFILE VIEW LIE 'A' - 1 am .m x1,m m m «m pm "P+€fi f AP% :,4..4.,.10, Vona, . �. LE x�,'.p�''''. - ,� Fxhihit 4 PLAN VIEW UNE 'A' Do 27 PRCFLE VEW LINE 'A' PROPOSE° V PVC C -S00."014" -R5) STANDARD S.ANETARy SEWER FOR BAUR, ABOVE Rif est PROPOSED D. DI OS' DEWS (11.4.) VIMI JOE! RESMINTS MO TROST BLOOM RPE SEAL OM DUALS) RICPOSE0 NM& RACISILL 10 RE DEEP NM.. FILL TO IXCAVAION WALL PROPOSED D. DJ. 45 BRIOS (1,1kW°11,1:14T tesein GRAM LI, PR:IPOSE0 FORCE WOLIIVISZgmliirml;Im01.1.r.TRE OR111 ''''''TE'.0‘06:41.9 Of INE WM. PS NECESSAST. RISTALL MEW SEAL RING MD REMO SMOULDERING Wrtil Cc. ma mi., i%6702T=01.'D OUTSDE FORCE MAIN DROP CONNECTION Digitally signed by Ratna S. Pottumuthu, P.E. FD.N,:tuce=rntRS. atht,na, o=Development Services, C:Rt: ou=City of Corpus Christi, net ierm'imie.ei email=ratnap@cctexas.com, c,JS Date: 201,04.2411:2J:28 EXISTING UTILMES SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! w•FE"-.IT:rz 811 8 5 8 0 w 0U - CC 0_ LLI 0 - CC w _J Cr CM LEI I— CO (0 ›- 3 5 I I =) §ig pf SHEET 18 oF CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AU. RUNGS. IABOR, TV,0 MANOR M TE IN. CM REPRESENTATIVE SI.. BE PRESENT DURING ACTUAL -RE �aoaro'..µo�E MEM B. CIP %NG CULVERT A WATER SERVICE PLAN Pvhihit 9 PROP°. ORAN. SW. SEWER • PROPOSED SANN. SEWER WC. Digitally signed by Patna 5. Pottumuthu, P.E. DN: cn=Patna S. Pottumutbu, P.E., o=Developm ant Services,ou=City of Corpus Christi, mail,Ptnap( cctexas<om,c=115 Date: 2015.0929113]:98-05'00' CALL BEFORE YOU OIC! inifiraTtr. Zit 811 aoo zoo to o zoo GN°i?iw Parma 4Q 11 WATER SERVICE PLAN SHEET 19 OF _2.4. P et is. 944, -Ft =rormr4='4r:'-'.•°z70- SIDE ELEVATION OF TYPICAL PIPE CULVERT MITER Cross Npe Length I"CrZs Jr',IAZ° 00— ri- , 1.M ITyp/ PIPE W2 BOLTED ANCHOR 1 MeCK7rvi7,-7 TVP I DETAIL GO Tuegor'irPgrsCIOrgePe= to mointoin 21 clear " ly ISOMETRIC VIEW OF TYPICAL INSTALLATION :Y2V'iTZ SECTION C -C CROSS PIPE DETAILS YP v----- Limits of Pier. Ito De Included vath C.E.T. for poymen. cD Cross Pipes (5) Mos - I ED 5. ot 2.-0.1 Mos 1 1 TriMmed Gope of Pipe Culvert 1 i IzTXr_i' i i Q Cro. Pipe Cflush with top of Florae/ i I , 0 gliti— irate% " MI eli Limits of Pier. , Tangent to Payment/0 portion Of Pipe Culvert Riprap pipe c.1,ert P,G!TG.T" CWgier "ncre'' Flow Line SECTION B -B ICross Pipes not snown for clority.1 SHOWING TYPICAL PIPE CULVERT & RIPRAP CROSS PIPE LENGTHS, REQUIRED PIPE SIZES, & RIPRAP QUANTITIES® trZt Conc NproG 1031 Pipe Culvert - Porn. 02 Coro:NV.1f. CrOMseP'... Cross 121 0.6 9. NrA 0.7 N/A N/A O. 9 N/A 0.9 N/A 3 or more Nbe Culverts N/A 3 Or more Pipe Culvert& N/A 2 or more Pipe CulVerts 331 1.2 Al I Pipe Culverts 31/f SOd , 1.3 Ali Pico [Giver. 01.41;01.g.O.1 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.7 Ail Pipe Culverts SHOWING CROSS PIPE WITH ANCHOR BAR Pipral7 Min, Q1 211 Min /---W7CMI:NY;Gie=Or tig'IWOrilf=7 02 or CO SIDE ELEVATION OF CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE SHOWING CROSS PIPE WITH BOLTED ANCHOR SECTION A -A 0 The or per in allatio of the first Creos Pice is critical for ve Mie s ety. T e top of the first Cross Pipe must be plo ed at no more tn. 61 above the flow line ® ge7.'floOWn'T %grlY1; "WEI' f'"' PiPe 2011 De 3 ./7. Standord PleeIG1 0.0.. l5,0 0 The third Cro s Pipe f om the bottom of the Culvert shell .7Torci cI;UT'to2e'r"mr.'ffoTITmo'Vet7..45s option, all other Cros Pipes'may'c'iso'oetinstal lee us.. the bolted co nection etoi.. rO: W,' f'0044 07; 7-=='255 4. VP,Z°05*005 ponti 1::rlhowp0 0022 0113 ,er:uCor ene end of one reinforced Concrete GENERAL NO ES. G0=ror, n'erZGI:G=Ge% gv=gaGeOV,IGIY:q::., ie=tiGT.Z=ITg 7=TZler.'"''Or,W!""e " 2F2An 1.7!:'',:irs:hcaTatlEeEniF;tr'e;gi'; 44'73% 11 Mverts shall be COndrete No. Meterial Producer List IMPLI moy be uSed M lieu of steel reinforcing i rip,. concrete unless noted Otherwise. th' P"ce 'TEIJIInTn Fscr:DirMeFAgF3F77"'I''°47 witn tne specifications. SAFETY END TREATMENT FOR 12. DIA TO 72. DIA PIPE CULVERTS TYPE 11 - PARALLEL DRAINAGE SETP-PD 00001 yonemsoro Exhibit 9 11111111 nhuuIHI 111 SHEER 2 0 OF _24 JOB NO. Engineer: Murf Hudson, P.E. By: C.R.R. WEST POINT CROSSING SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEABLE ESTIMATE April 25, 2016 Job No. 40706.B4.01 ITEM Description Quantity + Unit Unit Price Total Price A. REIMBURSEABLE SANITARY SEWER ITEMS: 5% 1 General Conditions 1 LS $ 40,500.00 $40,500.00 2 Mobilization 1 LS $ 35,000.00 $35,000.00 3 Lift Station 1 LS $ 259,000.00 $259,000.00 4 6" PVC Green C-900 Force Main (DR 25) 7040 LF $ 28.50 $200,640.00 5 6" D.I. 90 Degree Bend (M.J.) 1 EA $ 750.00 $750.00 6 6" D.I. 45 Degree Bend (M.J.) 20 EA $ 675.00 $13,500.00 7 6" D.I. 22 1/2 Degree Bend (M.J.) 3 EA $ 650.00 $1,950.00 8 6" Plug Valve 3 EA $ 2,000.00 $6,000.00 9 Air Release Valve 3 EA $ 4,300.00 $12,900.00 10 12" Steel Casing 44 LF $ 200.00 $8,800.00 11 Asphalt Repair 75 SY $ 90.00 $6,750.00 12 Tie Prop. Force Main to Exist. Manhole 1 LS $ 6,000.00 $6,000.00 13 Twin 30" RCP with S.E.T. 1 LS $ 4,500.00 $4,500.00 14 7" Thick Concrete Driveway 900 SF $ 7.50 $6,750.00 15 10" PVC Gravity Line (14'-16' Cut) 368 LF $ 85.00 $31,280.00 16 10" PVC Gravity Line (12'-14' Cut) 683 LF $ 78.00 $53,274.00 17 10" PVC Gravity Line (10'-12' Cut) 449 LF $ 55.00 $24,695.00 18 8" PVC Gravity Line (10'-12' Cut) 250 LF $ 51.00 $12,750.00 19 8" PVC Gravity Line (8'-10' Cut) 378 LF $ 44.00 $16,632.00 20 5' Diam. Manhole (14'-16' Deep) 1 EA $ 13,850.00 $13,850.00 21 4' Diam. Manhole (12'-14'Deep) 2 EA $ 10,500.00 $21,000.00 22 4' Diam. Manhole (10'-12' Deep) 1 EA $ 10,000.00 $10,000.00 23 4' Diam. Manhole (8'-10' Deep) 1 EA $ 9,000.00 $9,000.00 24 Pollution Prevention Plan 1 LS $ 3,750.00 $3,750.00 25 OSHA Trench Protection 2128 LF $ 4.00 $8,512.00 26 2" HDPE Waterline by Open Cut 84 LF $ 20.00 $1,680.00 27 2" HDPE Waterline by Boring 163 LF $ 30.00 $4,890.00 28 Water Meter 1 EA $ 1,000.00 $1,000.00 29 Tie Prop. 2" HDPE Waterline to Exist. Waterline 1 EA $ 2,000.00 $2,000.00 REIMBURSEABLE ITEMS SUB -TOTAL: $817,353.00 ENGINEERING FEE: $65,388.24 SURVEYING AND CONSTRUCTION STAKING: $14,300.00 TESTING: $14,300.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED REIMBURSEABLE ITEMS COSTS: $911,341.24 Urban Engineering TBPE Firm No. 145 2725 Swantner Drive Corpus Christi, Texas 78411 ERM 1°14 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS I. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY INSURANCE A. Contractor shall not commence work under this agreement until all insurance required herein has been obtained and approved by the City's Risk Manager or designee. Contractor must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of the subcontractor has been so obtained. B. Contractor shall furnish to the Risk Manager or designee two (2) copies of Certificates of Insurance, with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the Risk Manager or designee. The City must be listed as an additional insured for the General Liability policy and Business Auto Liability policy, and a waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -Day Notice of Cancellation required on all certificates or by policy endorsement(s) Bodily injury and Property Damage Per Occurrence / aggregate COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY 1. Broad Form 2. Premises — Operations 3. Products/Completed Operations Hazard 4. Contractual Liability 5. Broad Form Property Damage 6. Independent Contractors 7. Personal and Advertising Injury 8. Professional Liability (if applicable) 9. Underground Hazard (if applicable) 10. Environmental (if applicable) $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate BUSINESS AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 1. Owned 2. Hired & Non -owned 3. Rented & Leased $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit WORKERS' COMPENSATION (for paid employees) EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY Which Complies With The Texas Workers' Compensation Act And Paragraph II Of This Exhibit. $500,000 / $500,000 / $500,000 PROPERTY INSURANCE Contractor shall be responsible for insuring all owned, rented, or leased personal property for all perils. C. In the event of accidents of any kind related to this project, Contractor shall furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of such accidents within ten (10) days of the accident. Exhibit 5 Page 1 of 3 II. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Contractor must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company in accordance with Texas law. The contract for coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The coverage provided must be in amounts sufficient to assure that all workers' compensation obligations incurred will be promptly met. An "All States endorsement shall be included for Companies not domiciled in Texas. B. Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Contractor's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. C. Contractor shall be required to submit replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Contractor shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Management P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 (361) 826-4555- Fax # D. Contractor agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • List the City and its officers, officials, employees, volunteers, and elected representatives as additional insured by endorsement, or comparable policy language, as respects to operations, completed operations and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured performed under contract with the City. • The "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and • Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation, non -renewal or material change in coverage, and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. E. City shall have the option to suspend Contractor's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. F. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Contractor's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Contractor to stop work hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. Exhibit 5 Page 2 of 3 G. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contractor's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this agreement. H. It is agreed that Contractor's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations and completed operations and activities under this agreement. I. It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. Exhibit 5 Page 3 of 3 limarivasdrossid City of Corpus Christi DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS Cia,rCurpa ChrhlLTecib Deparw tfti of Levelopmerrt Scrvicen P.O. Box 9277 Carpus Cnriao, Tons.7&1699277 (361)326-3214 Loaned aL 2441, Leoverd 51rcri [Comer of Leoprrd SL aria Port Ave.) City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, ars amended, requires all persons crfirms peeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with `NA". NAME: Peterson Properties, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership STREET: P.O_ Box 8229 C1TY, Corpus Christi, Texas zip: 78468 FIRM is: EJ Corporation al Partnership [j Sole Owner ❑ Association ❑ Other DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an *"ownership Interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership In the above named "firm". Name Job litre and City Department (if know:~) N/A State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Title NIA Z. State the names orf ea h olatraird member' of the City of Corpus Christi having an 4ownetship interest' constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Board, Commission, or Committee NIA 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name N/A Consultant CERTIFICATE certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that 1 have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplements' statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Patricia Peterson Nuss (Print) ..._ Signature of Certifying Person; a Title: General Partner ro Date: " I..IDE El..011.47SVMSHxacrw NtiOE ELOPNffhTi]RdIXhNEE PAD{1S7TlA OICIAPPLICAMOVA FlairliMFORMS AS PER LEC.4.LM12WGSC7.OSlf8EOFMOON'S S KIEHENTL.27I2.DOG Exhibit Page 1 of 2 DEFINITIONS a "Board Member". A member of any board, commission or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. 'Employee_ Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, either on a full or pan time basis, but not as an independent contractor, c. "Firm". Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the toren of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust and entities which. For purposes of taxation, are treated as non-prafil organizations. d. "Official". The Mayor. members of the City Council, City hilanager. Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, e. "Ownership Interest'. Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate or holding entity- "Constructively held" refers to holding or control established through voting trusts, proxies or special terms of venture or partnership agreements. f, 'Consultant" Any person or Firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and nscommendation K 51:1EVELO(1MEKLSL'C5'SiLif EL .L ND DE1'ELCIMIENT6RIIRIANCE RL►x11V15TIl 1FONAP19•r(AT1gIN ptaRNSIVIIljI5 /Lti PLR ILAMI,,L,11.1.19.121SeLoanis Of INTEREME ..Sr,NeMeNT1.27 I'_ DOC Exhibit 6 Page 2 of iemiorimalarmelo City of Corpus Christi DISCLOSURE OF HTERESTs Cii of Curpm Chriid, Test. DrPsnrntnr of novehprnent Services. P O. Sox 92"7 aim Chnsd,Texas 7Eid4.9 7'r {36I}825-32-10 Located a 2.4.06 Leopard Sires {Cartier of Lep1perd St. Wld Port Ave City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112. es amended. requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered, If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA'. NAME: Peterson Properties. Ltd,. sTexas limited parinersiup STREET: P.O. Box 8229 Com: Corpus Christi, Texas zip: 784€8 FIRM is: ❑ Corporation L]x Partnership 0 Sole Owner ❑ Association ❑ Other DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS if additional space is necessary. please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest• constituting 3°6 or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Job Title and City Department {ft known) N/A 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Tittle Name N/A 3. State the names of each "Mrd member of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Board, Commission. or Committee N/A 4. State the names of each employee ar officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked an any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% ar more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name N/A Consultant CERTIFICATE I certify Thal ori information provided is true and correct as of the datis of this statement, that t have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christ, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Chris Ann Pete on Brow Title: Genera] Partner (Print) Signature of Certifying Person:Date: Evan P.i 45HAREN.ArD iwrne'llyOADINA.t!AMIN1STRA-namAPramAriiiONFDtllSEr�RMSASPER LEGA LWI I r ! SAM OFL'TMMIS TKELPage 2 Exhibit 6 DEFINITIONS a, "Board Member"_ A member of any board, commission or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. L "Employee". Any person employed by the City or Corpus Christi, Texas, either an a full or part time basks, but not as an independent contractor. 0. "Firm". Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stack company, joint venture, receivership or trust and entities which, for purposes of taxation, are treated as non-proM organizations. d. "Official". The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant Cihj Managers, Department arid Division deeds and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. e, "Ownership Interest", Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holding or control established through voting trusts, proxies or special terms of venture or partnership agreements. "Consultant", Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects. hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. I'['.ELOI IENTSVC5SFI I&Etri.i'JC}pEMOP I flAINNANCE.AbsrltzlirRAtlonhAteLicwronYroluls-tomi5AsOCR c L'Z'uIa intLo5tik1ttil,N1EaEs1S STATE.NULJ1I 27 IS DOC Exhibit 6 Page 2 of 2 City of Corpus Christi DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS City siC■rpm! Ckrk ,Tesws Dqrimml of GleooloprocrA Semite, PO Rag. 92// Corps, Cheer& Tm.A. JM6P-977 (Hbi) B2642,10. Louard n 2406 Leq*rrd Parer (Corot' or Leopad Si mad Port AV CllY of Corees Christ! Ordinance 17112, os 2rnencted, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered, It the question is not applicable, answer with 'NA". Nom: Peterson Properties, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership STREET' P.O. BCDt 8229 CITY: Corpus Christi, Texas FIRM is: ❑ Corporation ['Partnership ❑ Sole Owner ❑ Association ❑ Other DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet, 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm"; Name Job Title and City Department (if known) IP; 7e468 NIA 2. State the names of each "afficiel" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Titin NIA State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Board, Commission, or Committee NIA 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked ore any matter related to the subject of this contact and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "farm". Name NIA Consultant CERTIFICATE l certify that all inWormaiior! provided Is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the CO of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: James D (Print) Signature of Certifying Person: Title: .General Partner xUMVELOPMF.NISVCSs IAKEDILANDD .r 1 • : DEFINITIONS a. "Board Member". A member or any board, commission or committee appointed by the City Council of the City OF Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Employee". Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi. Texas, either on a full or part time basis, but not as an independent contractor. c. "Firm'. Any entity operated fol economic gain, whether professional, Industrial or commercial and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sore proprietorship, 2S self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stank company, joint venture. receivership or trust and entities which, for purposes of taxation, are treated as non-profit organizations_ d. "Olfrcie. The Mayor, rnenibers cif the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads and Municipal Court .fudges of the City of Carpus Christi, Texas. e. "Ownership Interest". Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively Field, in a firm, Including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate or holding entity, "Constructively held" refers to holding or control established through voting trusts, proxies or special terms of venture or partnership agreements. f. HConsultaIit'_ Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. K EV'ELticMERTSV'CS-SIIAkE Y,U 1I BL 'ELO tt Qfi' PMNet PAIRIJNISTILAMOtilAPPLICATION rDFk4LS F01L IS A9 PER LEGM1L. 11IDJI'LO t.'RF 9P Ir7FRLSF! STA7iF.iCFaT� 37.72t}DC I�]FL Page 2 f0 Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.312 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties, Complete Nos. 1. 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-23991 Date Filed: 03/09/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Peterson Properties, Ltd Corpus Christi, TX United States - 2 , Name iii gove�nmen[al entity of state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the goods or services to be provided under the contract. westpoint crossing,blocki,lo sanitary sewer collection line agreement 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary • ci ylLiG) 4.AustAil .1\)1)-1-5 .(1,,,,-)p TX U 5,A 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. El 6 AFFIDAVIT �` *, AFFIX Sworn 20 JUANAffF' I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. tui, al l f ( L ii. ,,r NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE/) [°and subscribed before me, by the said Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity j 1 y` L. t k(i' vis , this the J day of/44 i , I toi , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. d.f �%'�.��}' �li 7 ✓"' 4{ '51"S. am j- \ �'r`CLrL.[ Ii'- � .. :�✓'\_r1#4 S ture of officer ad ` nistering oath Printed name of officer adm nistering oath Title of officer gtfministering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.312 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-23988 Date Filed: 03/09/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. ' Peterson Properties, Ltd Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract (or arch the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the goods or services to be provided under the contract. Westpoint crossing,block 1,Iot sanitary sewer collection line agreement 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) - Controlling -. Intermediary (IS An 1/12-eAMS111 62-14/1/ "Or '. ("' X p5A 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. EI 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. - 1Sgn ,, —077 ---DEVELOPMENT CO 'ANY . p id ' (411C10_ ,;lorotioter..At "5'" . C ` ' ;" 8468-:. 29 AFFIX NOTARY STAMP 1 SEAL ABOVE Swor and subscribed before me, by the said tue ofut4---.horzed t ofcilfj-uactin business 9 entity / i Alis livrt (y 'a i i 6.0),,, , this the ) G day of '- t , 20 J tit , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. .1 • 1'1 F/v f�/iff4-I V/V - )D-1 °'v� r` Jf IAdt_'•• -44 - h` I(./,-4--- LIS Signature of o$cer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Tit a of officerradministering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.312 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1. 2.3, 5, and 6 if then: are no interested parties. 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Peterson Properties, Ltd Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmen entity or state agency + at is a party to e contract ,. r w c t form }s being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or ide description of the goods or services to be provided under the contract. Westpoint crossing,block 1,Io sanitary sewer collection line agreement Name of Interested Party OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number. 2016-23996 Date Filed: 03/09/2016 Date Acknowledged: ntify the contract, and provide a City, State, Country (place of business) nnCzxDiAA.Dn 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. 6 AFFIDAVIT z LAURA ELIZABETH LANGAN Commisslon *2111252 Notary PubHc - California Z% Santa Barbara County n M Comm. Expires Ma 12, 2019 Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is ime and correct. AFFIX NOTARY STAMP 1 SEAL ABOVE j %; Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said t {Y e Q1 -p SD - J this the / v 20 1 , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. Signature of officer administ ring oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission day of Pia rcin L ,f rc G`.r Printed name of officer administering oath Tide of officer administering oath www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.312 Vicinity Map WESTPOINT CROSSING BLOCK 1 LOT 1 AND 2 AERIAL OVERVIEW MAP AGENDA MEMORANDUM Public Hearing and First Reading for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of May 31, 2016 DATE: March 17, 2016 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Daniel McGinn, Director, Development Services Department DaielMc@cctexas.com (361) 826-3595 Alley closure located between Fifteenth Street and Sixteenth Street and from Buford Avenue to Hancock Avenue CAPTION: Ordinance abandoning and vacating an undeveloped and unsurfaced 5,655 -square foot (0.130 acres) portion of a 15 -foot wide public right-of-way, as shown and dedicated by Plat of Bay View No. 3, Block 6, a map of which is recorded in Volume A, Page 25, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, and requiring the owners, Corpus Christi Independent School District, and The Salvation Army, a Georgia Corporation to comply with the specified conditions. PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to abandon and vacate a 15 -foot wide public right-of-way in conjunction with the re -plat of Lots 1 through 16, Block 6, as Plat of Bay View No. 3, Block 6, Lot 1R (to be submitted at a later date). BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The Salvation Army, a Georgia Corporation is requesting the abandonment and vacation of an undeveloped and unsurfaced 5,655 -square foot (0.130 acres) of a 15 -foot wide public right-of-way, dedicated by Plat of Bay View No. 3, Block 6, a map of which is recorded in Volume A, Page 25, Map records of Nueces County, Texas. The abandonment and vacation of the undeveloped public street right-of-way is being requested in conjunction with the re -plat of Lots 1 through 16, Block 6, as Plat of Bay View No. 3, Block 6, Lot 1R (to be submitted at a later date). Staff recommends that the payment of the fair market value be waived since the alley contains no public utilities and has never been improved. The Owners have been advised of and concur with the conditions of the public alley abandonment and vacation ordinance. ALTERNATIVES: Denial of the street closure. This will, however, adversely impact the Owner's ability to move forward with future development or sale of the subject property. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The conditions of the ordinance are in compliance with City of Corpus Christi, Code of Ordinances §49-12 (a), as amended and approved on July 13, 2004, by Ordinance No. 025816. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: None of the City departments or franchised utility companies had any facilities within the public street right-of-way, or objections regarding the proposed public right-of-way abandonment. FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑x Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015- 2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance. Owners must comply with the following conditions: a. Upon approval by the City Council and issuance of the ordinance, all grants of streets/alleys closures must be recorded at the Owners' expense in the real property Official Deed and Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, in which the subject portion of the property is located, with a copy of the recording provided to the City. Prior to the issuance of any permits for construction on the land, an up-to-date survey, abstracted for all streets, alleys or public rights-of-way, and items of record must be submitted by the Owners to the Director of Development Services. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance with Exhibits Ordinance abandoning and vacating an undeveloped and unsurfaced 5,655 -square foot (0.130 acres) portion of a 15 -foot wide public right-of-way, as shown and dedicated by Plat of Bay View No. 3, Block 6, a map of which is recorded in Volume A, Page 25, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, and requiring the owners, Corpus Christi Independent School District, and The Salvation Army, a Georgia Corporation to comply with the specified conditions. WHEREAS, the Salvation Army, a Georgia Corporation is requesting the abandonment and vacation of an undeveloped and unsurfaced 5,655 -square foot (0.130 acres) of a 15 -foot wide public right-of-way, dedicated by Plat of Bay View No. 3, Block 6, a map of which is recorded in Volume A, Page 25, Map records of Nueces County, Texas. The abandonment and vacation of the undeveloped public street right-of-way is being requested in conjunction with the re -plat of Lots 1 through 16, Block 6, as Plat of Bay View No. 3, Block 6, Lot 1R (to be submitted at a later date). WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, a public hearing was held on Tuesday, May 24, 2016, during a meeting of the City Council, during which all interested parties and citizens were allowed to appear and be heard. WHEREAS, it has been determined that it is feasible and advantageous to the City of Corpus Christi to abandon and vacate the subject portion of the undeveloped and unsurfaced 5,655 -square foot (0.130 acres) of a 15 -foot wide public right-of-way, dedicated by Plat of Bay View No. 3, Block 6, a map of which is recorded in Volume A, Page 25, Map records of Nueces County, Texas, subject to compliance by the Owners with the conditions specified in this ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Pursuant to the request of the Salvation Army, a Georgia Corporation ("Owner") has requested the abandonment and vacation of an undeveloped and unsurfaced 5,655 -square foot (0.130 acres) of a 15 -foot wide public right-of-way, dedicated by Plat of Bay View No. 3, Block 6, a map of which is recorded in Volume A, Page 25, Map records of Nueces County, Texas is abandoned and vacated by the City of Corpus Christi ("City"), subject to the Owners' compliance with the conditions specified in Section 2 of this ordinance. Exhibit "A," which is a metes and bounds description of the subject portion, Exhibit "B," which is the graphical representation for the metes and bounds description, and Exhibit "C," which is the location map, are attached to and incorporated in this ordinance by reference as if each were fully set out herein in their entireties. SECTION 2. The abandonment and vacation of the public street right-of-way described in Section 1 of this ordinance is expressly conditioned upon the Owners' compliance with the following requirements: a. Upon approval by the City Council and issuance of the ordinance, all grants of streets/alleys closures must be recorded at the Owners' expense in the real property Official Deed and Map Records of Nueces County, Texas, in which the subject portion of the property is located, with a copy of the recording provided to the City. Prior to the issuance of any permits for construction on the land, an up-to-date survey, abstracted for all streets, alleys or public rights-of-way, and items of record must be submitted by the Owners to the Director of Development Services. The foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre The foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 20 ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor Exhibit A 0.130 Acres, 15 Foot Wide Alley Closure STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NUECES Job No. 43055.00.01 January 19th 2016 Revised: April 4, 2016 Fieldnotes, for a 0.130 Acre, 15 Foot Wide Alley Closure, more or less, of Block 6, Bay View No. 3, a map of which is recorded in Volume A, Page 25, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas; said 0.130 Acre Tract, being more fully described by metes and bounds as follows: Beginning, on the South line of Hancock Avenue, a public roadway, the Northeast corner of Lot 16, said Block 6, for the Northwest corner of this Tract; Thence, North 85°45'10" East, with the South line of the said Hancock Avenue, 15.00 Feet, to the Northwest corner of Lot 1, said Block 6, for the Northeast corner of this Tract; Thence, South 04°14'50" East, with the West line of Lots 1-8, said Block 6, 377.00 Feet, to the North line of .Buford Avenue, a public roadway, to the Southwest corner of the said Lot 8, for the Southeast corner of this Tract; Thence, South 85°45'10" West, with North line of the said Buford Avenue, 15.00 Feet, to the Southeast corner of Lot 9, said Block 6, for the Southwest corner of this Tract; Thence, North 04°14'50" West, with the East line of Lots 9-16, said Block 6, 377.00 Feet, to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.130 acres (5,655 Square Feet) of Land, more or less. Bearings based on GPS, NAD83 (2011), Texas Coordinate System of 1983, Texas South Zone 4205. This description was prepared from record information and does not represent a current on the ground Survey. Unless this fieldnote description, including preamble, seal and signature, appears in its entirety, in its original form, surveyor assumes no responsibility for its accuracy. Also reference accompanying sketch of Tract describe UR(1.B ENGI ING S:1Surveying143055100011OFFICEIMETES AND BOUNDS1430550001_O.130Acre.doc Page 1 of 1 (361)854-3101 2725 SWANTNER DR. • CORPUS CHRISTI,TEXAS 78404 www.urbaneng,com TBPE Firm #145 TBPLS Firm #10032400 1 ' 1W1 James D. Carr, R.P.L.S. License No. 6458 FAX (361)854-6001 Point of Lot 16 Lot 15 Lot 14 N Lot 13 L..- -'J _co hJ CC Co CO Lot 1 Z .,J X Lot 11 Lot 10 Lot 9 Exhibit B Sketch to Accompany Hancock Avenue (60 R.O.W.) •51 N8 5 O'O0sE Beginning Lot 1 15' Wide Alley Closure 0.130 Acre (5,655 Sq. Ft.) Lot 2 Lot 3 0 0 6) x —0 0 F- 00 Q Q r ° of 4 N = - N) M ° o n o U z N �zN W o _� a o 0 m>� z m > - I0 w TQ Lot m O o m O > (r)0 0o _ —Z o " U CO z Lot Lot Lot S85.4591 0"W 15.00 Buford Avenue (60' R,0 \N) Qi 4-' i o -N IX aD N� 5 -N 6 7 8 REV: DAT March 2 DATE: Jan. 166 200 6 16 SCALE: 1"=601 JOB NO.: 43055.00.01 SHEET: 1 of 2 DRAWN BY: RLG urbansurveyl®urbaneng.com 02016 b Urban Engineering riw0-/7/7n1(, 1n•1d•nn nn� g - URBAN — ENGINEERING TBPE FIRM N0.145, TBPLS FIRM N0.10032400 2725 SWANTNER DR, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78404 FIELDNOTES for 0.130 Acre, 15.00 foot wide alley closure, more or less, Block 6, Bay View No. 3, a mapof which is recorded in Volume A, Page 25, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas. PHONE: 361.854.3101 WWW.URBANENG.COM S•\Sllrvayin0\4•IHSS\nnnl\FX4.1nSSnnn1 VICINITY MAP BAYVIEW UNIT 3. BLOCK 6 ALLEY CLOSURE A ALLEY CLOSURE Corpus Christi Bay \ L3541 - Exhibit "0" Guff of Mexico Aerial Overview 1 N Aerial 1 N AGENDA MEMORANDUM Action Item for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 DATE: TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager May 18, 2016 FROM: Miles Risley, City Attorney MilesR@cctexas.com 826-3361 Resolution to appoint Interim City Manager CAPTION: Resolution to appoint Interim City Manager effective June 24, 2016 until the appointment and qualification of the new City Manager and authorizing the Mayor to set interim compensation. PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to appoint an Interim City Manager. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Ron Olson resigned May 17, 2016, effective at the expiration of his leave on June 23, 2016. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: None. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Deputy City Manager FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital x Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $ $ Encumbered / Expended Amount $ $ This item $ $ BALANCE $ $ Fund(s): Comments: RECOMMENDATION: Appoint an Interim City Manager LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution RESOLUTION TO APPOINT AN INTERIM CITY MANAGER EFFECTIVE JUNE 24, 2016 UNTIL THE APPOINTMENT AND QUALIFICATION OF THE NEW CITY MANAGER AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SET INTERIM COMPENSATION. Be it resolved by the Corpus Christi City Council: Section 1. The Corpus Christi City Council appoints as Interim City Manager effective June 24, 2016 until the appointment and qualification of the new City Manager and authorizes the Mayor to set interim compensation for said position. Section 2. Due to the absence of the City Manager, the Mayor is hereby authorized to increase the compensation of any person acting as City Manager immediately for the term of said absence. Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect and be in full force immediately after its adoption by the City Council. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas of , 2016 The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Rudy Garza Michael Hunter Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Lucy Rubio Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughn AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 DATE: May 20, 2014 TO: Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Mayor's Office Discussion and possible action of process for City Manager selection. STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name 1. 2. 3. OUTSIDE PRESENTER(S): Title/Position Name Title/Position 1. Toby Hammett Futrell Consultant 2. 3. Department Organization BACKGROUND: This item will provide information for Council discussion with possible action for the process of selecting the next City Manager for the City of Corpus Christi. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Attachment — Task List for Process for Hiring the City Manager. Discussion and Possible Action on Process for Hiring the City Manager 1 Tasks: 1. Solicit, Assess & Recommend Executive Search Firm for Hiring Process to Council 2. Coordinate Execution of Search Firm Contract with City Attorney 3. Manage Search Firm Contract: On Task, On Time & On Budget 4. Provide Regular Progress Reports on Hiring Process to Council 5. Help Council and Community Develop Candidate Profile and Qualifications 6. Coordinate with Relevant City Departments to Obtain Answers to Candidate Questions 7. Facilitate and Incorporate Council Feedback into Search Process 8. Assist in Development of Candidate Interview Questions with Council Feedback 9. Develop and Implement Process for Public Feedback on Top Candidates to Council 10. Provide Candidate Assessment and Facilitate Council Decision Process, as Needed 11. Develop and Facilitate Execution of Employment Offer Between City and Selected Candidate in Coordination with City Attorney Anticipated Time Line for Hiring Process: Between 3 — 6 months Consider Key Council Decisions Points During Process, Such As: a. Do a National Search? b. Characteristics of New City Manager: Ideal Candidate Profile and Qualifications? c. Design of Public Process for Feedback to Council on Top Candidates? d. Elements of Employment Offer: Pay, Benefits, Etc.? AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 17, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 DATE: May 4, 2016 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, P. E., Assistant City Manager markvv@cctexas.com (361) 826-3082 Valerie H. Gray, P. E., Executive Director of Public Works valerieg@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: J. H. Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 CAPTION: Engineering Construction Contracts and the Construction Phase and Observation Services Contract IDIQ Minor Street Improvement Project Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Ortiz Construction and Paving, Inc. for Part 1 in an amount of $1,813,485.00 and to execute a construction contract with Grace Paving & Construction, Inc. for Part 2 in the amount of $1,831,369.84 for the Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Minor Street Improvements project; and to execute a Construction Phase and Observation Services contract with Engineering & Construction Management Services, LLC of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $176,880 for the Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Minor Street Improvements project. These are multi-year contracts with a 1 -year base plus two 1 -year extensions. PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is to obtain authority to execute two construction contracts and a Construction Phase and Observation Services contract for the IDIQ Minor Street Improvement project. The construction and engineering services contracts are proposed as multi-year contracts with a 1 -year base plus two 1 -year optional extensions. Option years will be administratively authorized by the City Manager or his designee, if sufficient funds are available and successful performance by the contractors and engineering firm. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: This a multi-year IDIQ construction project for minor street pavement repairs involving pavement rehabilitation/replacement, base repairs with limestone, and sub -grade stabilization throughout the City. The work includes saw cutting, crack sealing, seal coating, milling, curb & gutter, driveway, sidewalk and ADA curb ramp replacement with minor utility manhole ring and cover and valve adjustments. The scope also includes the requirement to provide a pot hole repair crew, as needed. The project was developed with two Base Bids, Part 1 and Part 2, to allow potentially two construction contracts. Part 1 provides for the section of the City west of Ayers Street, and Part 2 provides for the section east of Ayers. It is recommended that two construction contracts be awarded to increase the capacity and number of crews to be more responsive to the City street maintenance and repairs. The project was also expanded in scope to increase the estimated quantities and budget to increase minor street repairs in preparation for future seal coats by the City Street Department in support of the Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP). This additional work allows the City crews to increase the total Square Yards of seal coats. The work will be issued in delivery orders that will provide specific scope and requirements. The engineering services for the field investigations, assessments, analysis and designated repairs developed into the individual delivery orders for both contractors. ECMS is exceptionally qualified to provide these services and is recommended to provide the required engineering services. On March 30, 2016, the City received proposals from three (3) bidders and the bids are as follows: Contractor Part 1 Part 2 A. Ortiz Construction & Paving, Inc. Corpus Christi, Texas $1,813,485.00 Grace Paving & Construction, Inc. Corpus Christi, Texas $1,826,496.84 $1,831,369.84 National Power Rodding Corporation Austin, Texas $2,633,201.68 $2,600,732.56 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize execution of two construction contracts for Part 1 and Part 2 with the Construction Phase Engineering Services contract. 2. Do not authorize execution of two construction contracts for Part 1 and Part 2 with the Construction Phase Engineering Services contract. (Not Recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Complies with statutory requirements for construction, architectural and engineering contracts. Conforms to the FY 2015-2016 Street Operating Budget. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Street Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Budget $4,000,000.00 $4,000,000.00 Encumbered / Expended Amount 17,500.00 17,500.00 This item $3,821,734.84 $3,821,734.84 Future Anticipated Expenditures This Project 151,552.00 151,552.00 BALANCE $9,213.16 $9,213.16 Fund(s): 1041 Comments: RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends execution of a construction contract with A. Ortiz Construction & Paving, Inc. for Part 1 and a construction contract with Grace Paving & Construction, Inc. for Part 2 and a Construction Phase and Observation Services contract with Engineering & Construction Management Services, LLC for $176,880.00 for the IDIQ Minor Street Improvement Project. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to administratively exercise the two additional option years. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Project Budget Location Map Presentation Contract Form 1295 PROJECT BUDGET ESTIMATE Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Minor Street Pavement Improvements FY 2015-2016 Project No. E15213 & E16250 -E16253 PROJECT FUNDS AVAILABLE: Street Operating Fund $ 4,000,000.00 TOTAL 4,000,000.00 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction: Construction Part 1 (A. Ortiz Construction) Construction Part 2 (Grace Paving) Construction Inspection and Testing: Engineer - (ECMS ) Construction and Observation Services Construction Materials Testing Part 1 (Rock) Construction Materials Testing Part 2 (Rock) Design Fees: Engineer - (ECMS ) Reimbursements: Contract Administration (Contract Preparation/Award/Admin) Engineering Services (Project Mgt//Traffic Mgt Services) Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 1,813,485.00 1,831,369.84 176,880.00 10,026.00 10,026.00 17,500.00 50,000.00 80,000.00 1,500.00 TOTAL $ 3,990,786.84 ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE $ 9,213.16 Corpus Chr sti Engineering Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Minor Street Improvements Council Presentation May 17, 2016 C I - v ▪ Repairs and improvements West of Ayers St. (Base Bid - Part 1 ) .11 Son qoo bsto rJ, Project Location �hrsti Engineering Petranda Tierra Grande pus hristl Ayers St. cnavrnan r+ancb of Ingleside r,i, The Ba -. Repairs and irnprovenlents East of Ayers St (Base Bid - Part 2) Project Scope �hrsti Engineering Project includes three contract actions: Citywide Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Construction Contract to two contractors for minor street pavement repairs (1 -year) with two 1 -year option years • Base Bid (Part 1) to include repairs west of Ayers Street • Base Bid (Part 2) to include repairs east of Ayers Street • Engineering Services contract for the field investigations and preparation of the Delivery Orders Work includes minor street pavement rehabilitation/replacement, base repairs with limestone, and sub -grade stabilization, saw cutting, crack sealing, seal coating, milling, curb & gutter, driveway replacement, curb ramps, and minor utility manhole ring & cover and valve adjustments Project Schedule �hrsti Engineering 2015 2016 2017 Dec Jan Feb resign? Mar Apr Bid May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Construction Construction Estimate: 365 Calendar Days 12 Months IDIQ Minor Street Improvements Includes Project Numbers: E16250-16253 CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Odem Morgan Farm Area Sinton Rancho Chico Del Sol -Loma Linda Taft i arch San 7 Pedro Rpbstown Petronila Repairs and improvements West of Ayers St. (Base Bid - Part 1) Tierra Grande rpus r hristi Ayers St. Tradewinds C L)ovl e PuI t drr.l Ingleside Ingleside on the BHy Chapman Ranch Repairs and improvements East of Ayers St. (Base Bid - Part 2) VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE f Project Number: E15213 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Construction Phase and Observation Services CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home rule municipal corporation, P.O. Box 9277, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas 78469-9277 (City) acting through its duly authorized City Manager or Designee (Director of Engineering Services) and ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, a Texas limited liability corporation, 5001 Oakmont, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas 78413, (Consultant), hereby agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF PROJECT IDIQ Minor Street Improvements (Project No. E15213) - This project is an IDIQ construction project to perform minor street pavement repairs involving pavement rehabilitation/replacement, base repairs with limestone, and sub -grade stabilization throughout the City. The work will be issued in delivery orders that will provide specific scope and requirements. The work will include new saw cutting, crack sealing, seal coating, milling, curb & gutter, driveway, sidewalk and ADA curb ramp replacement, minor utility manhole ring and cover and valve adjustments. Also included is the requirement to provide a pot hole repair crew, as needed. It is intended to award this project to two contractors as Part 1 and Part 2, with delivery orders geographically located. All provisions of this contract will apply to Part 1 and Part 2. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES The Consultant hereby agrees to perform services to complete the Project, as detailed in Exhibit "A". In addition, Consultant will provide monthly status updates (project progress or delays presented with monthly invoices) and provide contract administration services, as described in Exhibit "A", to complete the Project. Work will not begin on Additional Services until requested by the Consultant (provide breakdown of costs, schedules), and written authorization is provided by the Director of Engineering Services. 3. ORDER OF SERVICES The Consultant agrees to begin work on those authorized Basic Services for this contract upon receipt of the Notice to Proceed from the Director of Engineering Services. Work will not begin on any phase or any Additional Services until requested in writing by the Consultant and written authorization is provided by the Director of Engineering Services. The anticipated schedule of the preliminary phase, design phase, bid phase, and construction phase is shown on Exhibit "A". This schedule is not to be inclusive of all additional time that may be required for review by the City staff and may be amended by or with the concurrence of the Director of Engineering Services. The Director of Engineering Services may direct the Consultant to undertake additional services or tasks provided that no increase in fee is required. Services or tasks requiring an increase of fee will be mutually agreed and evidenced in writing as an amendment to Contract for Professional Services Page 1 of 7 K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\ANGIEM\STREET\E15213 IDIQ MINOR STREET IMPR\CONSTRUCTION AND OBSERVATION SERVICES \15-1209 AE AGREEMENT.DOC this contract. Consultant shall notify the City of Corpus Christi within three (3) days of notice if tasks requested requires an additional fee. 4. FEE The City will pay the Consultant a fee as described in Exhibit "A" for providing services authorized, a total fee not to exceed $176,880.00. Monthly invoices will be submitted in accordance with Exhibit "B". 5. INDEMNITY Consultant shall fully indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi and its officials, officers, agents, employees, or other entity, excluding the engineer or architect or that person's agent, employee or subconsultant, over which the City exercises control ("Indemnitee") from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, to the extent that the damage is caused by or results from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property infringement or failure to pay a subcontractor or supplier committed by Consultant or its agent, Consultant under contract or another entity over which Consultant exercises control while in the exercise of rights or performance of the duties under this agreement. This indemnification does not apply to any liability resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the City or its employees, to the extent of such negligence. Consultant shall defend Indemnitee, with counsel satisfactory to the City Attorney, from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, if the claim is not based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee. If a claim is based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee, the Consultant shall reimburse the City's reasonable attorney's fees in proportion to the Consultant's liability. Consultant must advise City in writing within 24 hours of any claim or demand against City or Consultant known to Consultant related to or arising out of Consultant's activities under this Agreement 6. INSURANCE 6.1 Consultant must not commence work under this agreement until all required insurance has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Consultant must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. 6.2 Consultant must furnish to the Director of Engineering Services with the signed agreement 1 copies of Certificates of Insurance (COI) with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies, and a waiver of subrogation is required on all Contract for Professional Services Page 2 of 7 KIENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGEWNGIEMISTREETIE15213 ID10 MINOR STREET IMPRICONSTRUCTION AND OBSERVATION SERVICESI15-1209 AE AGREEMENT.DOC applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with COI. Project name and or number must be listed in Description Box of COI. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -written day notice of cancellation, required on all certificates or by applicable policy endorsements Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate Commercial General Liability including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises — Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non -Owned 3. Rented/Leased $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY (Errors and Omissions) $1,000,000 Per Claim $2,000,000 Aggregate (Defense costs shall be outside policy limits) If claims made policy, retro date must be prior to inception of agreement, have extended reporting period provisions and identify any limitations regarding who is insured. WORKERS' COMPENSATION (All States Endorsement if Company is not domiciled in Texas) Employer's Liability Statutory $500,000 /$500,000 /$500,000 6.3 In the event of accidents of any kind related to this agreement, Consultant must furnish the City with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. 6.4 Applicable for paid employees, Consultant must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers' Contract for Professional Services Page 3 of 7 K\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGEANGIEMISTREEBE15213 tDIQ MINOR STREET IMPRICONSTRUCTION AND OBSERVATION SERVICES115-1209 AE AGREEMENT.DOC compensation coverage provided must be in an amount sufficient to assure that all workers' compensation obligations incurred by the Consultant will be promptly met. An All States Endorsement shall be required if Consultant is not domiciled in the State of Texas. 6.5 Consultant shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Consultant's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. Consultant is required to provide City with renewal Certificates. 6.6 Consultant shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Consultant shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Engineering Services P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 6.7 Consultant agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: 6.7.1 List the City and its officers, officials, employees and elected representatives as additional insured by endorsement, as respects operations, completed operation and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy and professional liability/Errors & Omissions policy; 6.7.2 Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; 6.7.3 Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and 6.7.4 Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation, non -renewal or material change in coverage, and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. 6.8 Within five (5) calendar days of a suspension, cancellation or non -renewal of coverage, Consultant shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Consultant's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 6.9 In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Consultant's failure to Contract for Professional Services Page 4 of 7 KIENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGEIANGIEMISTREET1E15213 IDIO MINOR STREET IMPRICONSTRUCTION AND OBSERVATION SERVICES115-1209 AE AGREEMENT.DOC provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Consultant to remove the exhibit hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) if any, which become due to Consultant hereunder until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. 6.10 Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Consultant's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this agreement. 6.11 It is agreed that Consultant's insurance shall be deemed primary and non- contributory with respect to any insurance or self-insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this agreement. 6.12 It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. 7. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT The City may, at any time, with or without cause, terminate this contract upon seven days written notice to the Consultant at the address of record. In this event, the Consultant will be compensated for its services on all stages authorized based upon Consultant and City's estimate of the proportion of the total services actually completed at the time of termination. 8. LOCAL PARTICIPATION The City Council's stated policy is that City expenditures on contracts for professional services be of maximum benefit to the local economy. 9. ASSIGNABILITY The Consultant will not assign, transfer or delegate any of its obligations or duties in this contract to any other person without the prior written consent of the City, except for routine duties delegated to personnel of the Consultant staff. If the Consultant is a partnership, then in the event of the termination of the partnership, this contract will inure to the individual benefit of such partner or partners as the City may designate. No part of the Consultant fee may be assigned in advance of receipt by the Consultant without written consent of the City. The City will not pay the fees of expert or technical assistance and consultants unless such employment, including the rate of compensation, has been approved in writing by the City. 10.OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS All documents including contract documents (plans and specifications), record drawings, contractor's field data, and submittal data will be the sole property of the City, may not be used again by the Consultant without the express written consent of the Director of Engineering Services. However, the Consultant may use standard details that are not Contract for Professional Services Page 5 of 7 KIENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGEIANGIEMISTREETE15213 IDIQ MINOR STREET IMPRICONSTRUCTION AND OBSERVATION SERVICES115-1209 AE AGREEMENT.DOC specific to this project. The City agrees that any modification of the plans will be evidenced on the plans, and be signed and sealed by a professional engineer prior to re -use of modified plans. 11. STANDARD OF CARE Services provided by Consultant under this Agreement shall be performed with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by competent engineers or architects practicing in the same or similar locality and under the same or similar circumstances and professional license; and performed as expeditiously as is prudent considering the ordinary professional skill and care of a competent engineer or architect. 12. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Consultant agrees to comply with City of Corpus Christi Ordinance No. 17112 and complete the Disclosure of Interests form as part of this contract. 13. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES Consultant agrees to comply with Texas Government Code section 2252.908 and complete Form 1295 Certificate of Interested Parties as part of this contract, if required. For more information, please review the information on the Texas Ethics Commission website at https://www.ethics.state.tx.us. 14. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Consultant agrees to comply with Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Government Code and file Form CIQ with the City Secretary's Office, if required. For more information and to determine if you need to file a Form CIQ, please review the information on the City Secretary's website at http:/lwww.cctexas.com/government/city-secretarylconflict- disclosure/index. 15. ENTIRE AGREEMENT AND CONTROLLING LAW This Agreement represents the entire and integrated Agreement between City and Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either oral or written. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both the City and Consultant. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Texas without regard to its conflicts of laws. Venue for legal proceedings lies exclusively in Nueces County, Texas. 16. CONFLICT RESOLUTION BETWEEN DOCUMENTS Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges if anything contained in the Consultant - prepared Exhibit A, Consultant's Scope of Services, or contained in any other document prepared by Consultant and included herein, is in conflict with this Agreement, this Agreement shall take precedence and control to resolve said conflict. Contract for Professional Services Page 6 of 7 K'ENGINEERING DATAEXCI-A..NGEIANGJEM1STREET\E15213 IDIQ MINOR STREET IMPR\CONSTRUCTION AND OBSERVATION SERVICES115-1209 AE AGREEMENT. DOC CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC. -4 7 [4. /-/tea) J. H. Edmonds, P.E. Date Felix H. Ocanas, Jr., .E. Date Director of Engineering Services President 5001 Oakmont Corpus Christi, Texas 78413 RECOMMENDED (361) 549-4576 Office ecros(c�att.net 3/8// Operating Departmen Da e APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM (LyL, (h _ .t} .511 te Legal Department Date Office of Management and Budget ATTEST ;Ili (1(4:0 Dat Rebecca Huerta Date City Secretary Project No. E15213 Accounting Unit: 1041-12430-051 Account: 530215 Activity: E15213011041 EXP Account Category: 30213 Fund Name: Street Operating Encumbrance No. Contract for Professional Services Page 7 of 7 K:4ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGEIANGIEMkSTREETIE15213 IDIO MINOR STREET IMPRICONSTRUCTION AND OBSERVATION SERVICES115-1209 AE AGREEMENT.DOC EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS IDIQ MINOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS (Project Number 15213 I. SCOPE OF SERVICES A. Basic Services. 1. Preliminary Phase. : a. seatrasf.• 2. Construction Phase. The A/E will perform contract administration to include the following: (For Part 1 and Part 2 of this project) a. Participate in pre -construction meeting conference and provide a recommended agenda for critical construction activities and elements impacted the project. b. Review for conformance to contract documents, shop and working drawings, materials and other submittals. c. Review field and laboratory tests. d. Provide interpretations and clarifications of the contract documents for the contractor and authorize required changes, which do not affect the contractor's price and are not contrary to the general interest of the City under the contract. e. Make regular visits to the site of the Project to confer with the City project inspector and contractor to observe the general progress and quality of work, and to determine, in general, if the work is being done in accordance with the contract documents. This will not be confused with the project representative observation or continuous monitoring of the progress of construction. f. Prepare change orders as authorized by the City (coordinate with the City's construction division); provide interpretations and clarifications of the plans and specifications for the contractor and authorize minor changes which do not affect the contractor's price and are not contrary to the general interest of the City under the contract. g. Make final inspection with City staff and provide the City with a Certificate of Completion for the project. h. As applicable, review and assure compliance with plans and specifications, the preparation of operating and maintenance manuals (by the Contractor) for all equipment installed on this Project. These manuals will be in a "multimedia format" suitable for viewing with Microsoft's Internet Explorer, version 3.0. As a minimum the Introduction, Table of Contents, and Index will be in HTML (HyperText Markup Language) format, with HyperText links to the other parts of the manual. The remainder of the manual can be scanned images or a mixture of scanned images and text. Use the common formats for scanned images - GIF, TIFF, JPEG, etc.. Confirm before delivery of the manuals that all scanned image formats are compatible with the image -viewing software available on the City's computer - Imaging for Win95 (Wang) and Microsoft Imaging Composer. Deliver the manuals on a CD-ROM, not on floppy disks. K:1EnglnearingWPROJECTISTREETSWIstiE15213 tOIQ fu9nor Street tmprwamnenlsSContreclltarge Intttan2 EXHIBIT A LARGE AE 101Q E15213.doc EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 5 i. Review construction "red -line" drawings, prepare record drawings of the Project as constructed (from the "red -line" drawings, inspection, and the contractor provided plans) and deliver to the Engineering Services a reproducible set and electronic file (AutoCAD r.14 or later) of the record drawings within two (2) months of final acceptance of the project. All drawings will be CADD drawn using dwg format in AutoCAD, and graphics data will be in dxf format with each layer being provided in a separate file. Attribute data will be provided in ASCII format in tabular form. All electronic data will be compatible with the City GIS system. The City staff will: a. Prepare applications/estimates for payments to contractor. b. Conduct the final acceptance inspection with the Engineer. B. Additional Services (ALLOWANCE) This section defines the scope (and ALLOWANCE) for compensation for additional services that may be included as part of this contract, but the NE will not begin work on this section without specific written approval by the Director of Engineering Services. Fees for Additional Services are an allowance for potential services to be provided and will be negotiated by the Director of Engineering Services as required. The NE will, with written authorization by the Director of Engineering Services, do the following: 1. Construction Observation Services. Provide a project representative (PR) to provide periodic construction inspection. A. Through such additional observations of Contractor's work in progress and field checks of materials and equipment by the PR and assistants, the A/E shall endeavor to provide further protection for the CITY against defects and deficiencies in the work. B. The duties and responsibilities of the PR are described as follows: 1. General: PR will act as directed by and under the supervision of A/E, and will confer with A/E regarding PR's actions. PR's dealings in matters pertaining to the Contractor's work in progress shall in general be with A/E and Contractor, keeping the CITY advised as necessary. 2. Conference and Meetings: Attend meetings with Contractor, such as pre - construction conferences, progress meetings, job conferences and other project - related meetings as required by the City, and prepare and circulate copies of minutes thereof. 3. Liaison: A. Serve as liaison with Contractor, working principally through Contractor's superintendent and assist in understanding the intent of the Contract Documents. B. PR shall communicate with CITY with the knowledge of and under the direction of A/E 4. Interpretation of Contract Documents: Report when clarifications and interpretations of the Contract Documents are needed and transmit to Contractor clarifications and interpretations as Issued. 5. Shop Drawings and Samples: A. Receive Samples, which are fumished at the Site by Contractor, and notify of availability of Samples for examination. B. Record date of receipt of Samples and approved Shop Drawings. K1EneneetingWPRRJECT\STREETSW6ac1E15213 CDIQ Minor Street Improvammn$ CortVacaLarge httUaR2 EXHIBIT A LARGE AE IDtG E15213.doc EXHIBIT "A" Page2of5 C. Advise Contractor of the commencement of any portion of the Work requiring a Shop Drawing or Sample submittal for which PR believes that the submittal has not been approved. 6. Review of Work and Rejection of Defective Work: A. Conduct on -Site observations of Contractor's work in progress to assist A/E in determining if the Work is in general proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents. B. Report whenever PR believes that any part of Contractor's work in progress will not produce a completed Project that conforms to the Contract Documents or will prejudice the integrity of the design concept of the completed Project, or has been damaged, or does not meet the requirements of any inspection, test or approval required to be made; and advise City and A/E of that part of work in progress that PR believes should be corrected or rejected or should be uncovered for observation, or requires special testing, inspection or approval. C. Observe whether Contractor has arranged for inspections required by Laws and Regulations, including but not limited to those to be performed by public agencies having jurisdiction over the Work. 7. Records: A. Maintain orderly files for correspondence, reports of job conferences, reproductions of original Contract Documents including all Change Orders, Field Orders, Work Change Directives, Addenda, additional Drawings issued subsequent to the Contract, A/E's clarifications and interpretations of the Contract Documents, progress reports, Shop Drawing and Sample submittals received from and delivered to Contractor, and other Project related documents. B. Prepare a daily report utilizing approved City format, recording Contractor's hours on the Site, weather conditions, data relative to questions of Change Orders, Field Orders, Work Change Directives, or changed conditions, Site visitors, daily activities, decisions, observations in general, and specific observations in more detail as in the case of observing test procedures; and send copies to A/E and the City. 8. Reports: A. Furnish periodic reports as required of progress of the Work and of Contractor's compliance with the progress schedule and schedule of Shop Drawing and Sample submittals. B. Report immediately to the CITY and A/E the occurrence of any Site accidents, any Hazardous Environmental Conditions, emergencies, or acts of God endangering the work, and property damaged by fire or other causes. C. Provide project photo report on CD-ROM at the rate of a minimum of two photographs per day, including an adequate amount of photograph documentation of utility conflicts. 9. Completion: A. Before the issue of Certificate of Completion, submit to Contractor a list of observed items requiring completion or correction. B. Participate in a final inspection in the company of A/E, the CITY, and Contractor and prepare a final list of Items to be completed or corrected. C. Observe whether all items on final list have been completed or corrected and make recommendations concerning acceptance and issuance of the Notice of Acceptability of the Work. 2. Start-up Services. Provide on-site services and verification for all start-up procedures during actual start up of major Project components, systems, and related appurtenances if needed and required. K: lEngineeringlMPRGJEC RSTREETSWIsc1E152131G>Q liner Street Improve menbsContredllarge Mittefl2 EXHIBIT A LARGE AE IOIG El6213.doe EXHIBIT "A" Page 3 of 5 3 Warranty Phase. Provide a maintenance guaranty inspection toward the end of the one- year period after acceptance of the Project. Note defects requiring contractor action to maintain, repair, fix, restore, patch, or replace improvement under the maintenance guaranty terms of the contract. Document the condition and prepare a report for the City staff of the locations and conditions requiring action, with its recommendation for the method or action to best correct defective conditions and submit to City Staff. Complete the inspection and prepare the report no later than sixty (60) days prior to the end of the maintenance guaranty period. 4 Provide the services above authorized in addition to those items shown on Exhibit "A-1" Task List, which provides supplemental description to Exhibit W. Note: The Exhibit "A-1" Task List does not supersede Exhibit "A". 2. SCHEDULE Day Date Activity Tuesday April 12, 2016 Contract Award Wednesday May 11, 2016 Begin Construction Thursday May 11, 2017 Complete Construction 3. FEES A. Fee for Basic Services. The City will pay the A/E a fixed fee for providing for all "Basic Services" authorized as per the table below. The fees for Basic Services will not exceed those identified and will be full and total compensation for all services outlined in Section I.A.1-4 above, and for all expenses incurred in performing these services. The fee for this project is subject to the availability of funds. The Engineer may be directed to suspend work pending receipt and appropriation of funds. For services provided in Section I.A.1-4, A/E will submit monthly statements for basic services rendered. In Section I.A.1-3, the statement will be based upon AIE's estimate (and City concurrence) of the proportion of the total services actually completed at the time of billing. For services provided in Section I.A.4, the statement will be based upon the percent of completion of the construction contract. City will make prompt monthly payments in response to AJE's monthly statements. B. Fee for Additional Services. For services authorized by the Director of Engineering Services under Section I.B. "Additional Services," the City will pay the A/E a not -to -exceed fee as per the table below: K:1Engtaoawing1MPRQJECIISTREETS'Msc1Et5213 IDIQ Minor Street Improvements1ContrechLarge tnttlaR2 EXHIBIT A LARGE AE ID3Q E15213.doc EXHIBIT "A" Page 4 of 5 Su Basic Services Fees 2.Desig-Phase --- 3. Bid Phaco ---- 4. Construction Phase (12x22x3x$90) $71,280 Subtotal Basic Services Fees $71,280 Additional Services Fees (Allowance) 5. Construction Observation Services(12x22x8x$50) $105,600 7. Warranty Phase (included in 5 above) — Sub -Total Additional Services Fees Authorized Total Authorized Fee 176,880 K1EngtneertngIMPROJECT4STREETSILGsdEt5213 (DIQ I tutor Street daprovemmeffi1ContracMalge INUalt2 EXHIBIT LARGE AE 11310 E15213 -doe EXHIBIT "A" Page 5 of 5 • EXHIBIT "A-1" TASK LIST (Provides supplemental description to Exhibit "A". Exhibit "A-1" Task List does not supersede Exhibit "A.") CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS IDIQ MINOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS (Project No. E15213) Basic Services (See Exhibit "A") Additional Services: (For Part 1 and Part 2) CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION SERVICES 1) Provide construction observation services as authorized by the City in accordance with Exhibit 'A' of the Contract for Professional Services. 2) Conduct daily site visits to the project site during construction. 3) Prepare monthly reports and submit to City staff as required.. 4) Provide detailed coordination with City staff during construction. 5) Coordinate construction activities with materials testing laboratory. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PHASE 1) Assist the City in preparing notices, handouts and exhibits for public Information meetings. 2) Assist the City in conducting the public information meetings. 3) Assist the City with follow-up and response to citizen comments. 4) Revise contract drawings to address citizen comments, as directed by the City. WARRANTY PHASE Upon receiving authorization from the City to proceed, conduct a maintenance guaranty inspection toward the end of the one-year period after acceptance of the project. Note defects requiring contractor action to maintain, repair, fix, restore, patch, correct or replace improvements under the maintenance guaranty terms of the construction contract. Document the condition and prepare a report for the City staff of the locations and conditions requiring action. EXHIBIT "A-1" Pagel oft i EngirteedngVAPROJECTiSTREETWAse1E1S213 [DIG Minor Street Imerovemere CeetredG erge IkLUat 3 EXHIBIT A-1 TASK LIST LARGE AE LDIQ E15213.doc Basic Services: Preliminary Phase Design Phase Bid Phase Report Phase Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Additional Services: Permitting Warranty Phase Inspection Platting Survey Reporting 0 & M Manuals SCADA Subtotal Additional Services Summary of Fees Basic Services Fees Additional Services Fees Total of Fees COMPLETE PROJECT NAME Project No. xxxxxx Invoice No. 12345 Invoice Date: Total Amount Previous Total Percent Contract Amd No. 1 Amd No. 2 Contract Invoiced Invoice Invoice Complete $15,117 $0 $0 $15,117 $0 $1,000 $1,000 7% 20,818 0 0 20,818 1,000 500 1,500 7% 0 0 0 0 0 0 O n/a 14,166 0 0 14,166 0 0 0 n/a 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $50,101 $0 $0 $50,101 $750 $1,500 $2,500 5% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n/a 9,011 0 0 9,011 0 0 0 0% 29,090 0 0 29,090 0 0 0 0% 1,294 0 0 1,294 0 0 0 0% TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 0% TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0% $39,395 $0 $0 $39,395 $0 $0 $0 0% $50,101 $0 $0 $50,101 $750 $1,500 $2,500 5% 39,395 0 0 39,395 0 0 0 0% $89,496 $0 $0 $89,496 $750 $1,500 $2,500 3% CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST City of Christi City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definitions. COMPANY NAME: Engineering & Construction Management Services, LLC P. O. BOX: ccai a IC in, o ,,,- Y- CG v STREET ADDRESS: 5001 Oakmont FIRM IS: 1. Corporation e G14 y csch -44 )43 CITY: Corpus Christi ZIP: 78413 2. Partnership 4. Association 5. Other 3. Sole Owner LLL DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm.' Name Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Board, Commission or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an `ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Consultant 0 FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Felix H. Ocanas Jr., P.E. Title: President (Type or Print) Signature of Certifying Person: 7 -Li -Ow,* DEFINITIONS Date: // Zo1 a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. g. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-14560 Date Filed: 02/17/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. ECMS, LLC Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the goods or services to be provided under the contract. E15213 Engineering Services 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling intermediary Felix , Ocanas : Corpus Christi, TX United States X 5 Check only 11 there is NO Interested Party. ❑ 6 AFFIDAVIT AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE Sworn and subscribed before me, by the said 20 1 to certify which. witness my hand 1-e-' I swear, or affirm, underen p ally of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. -R---1-4 /4., Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity I X if f kt t r t(teb W is the ((1 day of •� "`+� '� , and At seal of office.' 46lOZ 6{Gyy 601I'd#6 'up�'wJO �Vdj��'°`'' `."�s tvt �ry{ �i ��j�� . . ��, • 1 ' sV I'4 41111,4, a t nature of officer administering oath � Prid name of officer administering oath 4 Titledf a mart s + •_• • •- Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.34944 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1of1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-50784 Date Filed: 05/05/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. A. Ortiz Construction & Paving Inc. Corpus Christi , TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E16250 Minor Street Improvements 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check if there is NO Interested Party. only 6 AFFIDAVIT AFFIX 20 I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. " ' AMANDA S MCBROOM — /1 Notary Public, State of Texas ettd-ATet.c "a�:;: ,,:.•fey;= My Commission Expires Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity F•°.`,``' July 17, 2018 NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE ‘)11.11--1'�/�Swo r to. and subscribed before me, by the saidAlaCt_ . this the ` ' ` day of , 1 LP . to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. A .)M vi,,v,, 1) Signature of officer administ ringoath Printed name of officer administ rin oath Title of officerv), aiioath 9 g ministering Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-50780 Date Filed: 05/05/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. A. Ortiz Construction & Paving Inc. Corpus Christi , TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E16251 Minor Street Improvements 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check if there is NO Interested Party. only El 6 AFFIDAVIT AFFIX 20 Swirl' I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. AMANDA S MCBROOM ` Notary Public, State of Texas My Commission Expires July 17, 2018 Signature of authorized agent ri' contracting business entity the day of "' 1 4 Tic.) 1Ai—n' :=TA'M'P 7S" i- A to acid subscribed before me, by the sai` 1)y-A-i.this d . to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. - WkiT,y1' trk \\,''i IlitM 4\tralaP6 Signature of officer admin_ erin oath Printed name of officer a8 ministering oath Title of office administering oath 9 r3 Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-50777 Date Filed: 05/05/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. A. Ortiz Construction & Paving Inc. Corpus Christi , TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E16252 Minor Street Improvements 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. 0 6 AFFIDAVIT AFFIX S 20 1. ), ': +• ; � NOTARY n to and subscribed to I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. 1/ /1_ �[ M r' -gent AMANDA S MCBROOM `- Notary Public, State of Texas My Commission Expires July 17, 2018 Signature of authorized a(0 contracting business entity qq{� 111JtLi y this the J " ' ` day of ‘44.01 STAMP / SEAL ABOVE before me, by the said certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. rOurA 4,,L4Lati.tik,thh•fsk._ \\,04 -1014b11 -u ignature of officer admi - ering oath Printed name of officer ministering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-50775 Date Filed: 05/05/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. A. Ortiz Construction & Paving Inc. Corpus Christi , TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract tor which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E16253 Minor Street Improvements 4 Name of Interested PartyCity,State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. X 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. ''''=''• �,. 1-��rr AMANDA S MCBROOM Notary Public, State of Texas - �J ,r t , 1 7 s . t ..,; My Commission Expires ..'k o. ```' July 17,.2018 1 11 ure of authorized agent of�cling business entity AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE VA') A,� Sw pi and subscribed before me, by the said hl l t N. 0 417i . this the V1 day of M Q 20 (J to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. LP ilfia PON(0 0 P(1 4\-IstuukciA ;. 0_. room. _. q„ IlL tkA9 1 ai Signature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath le of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 3 there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-50843 Date Filed: 05/05/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Grace Paving And Construction, Inc. Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being flied. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E16250, E16251, E16252, E16253 IDIQ Minor Street Improvements 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling intermediary Trayler, Teri Corpus Christi, TX United States X Ortiz, Eddie Corpus Christi, TX United States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. 012%',-. TERI TRAYLER :*; _i_ '*= MY COMMISSION EXPIRES L41 'o;� MARCH 18, 2018 Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE / ! , Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said 0 L 1411-1-- Al ( `L� , this the �" day of / al, , 20 /6" , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. Signature of officer admin i eying oath Printed name of offic r administering oath Title of officer administering oath rovsded by Texas Ethics Commission wv w.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 AGENDA MEMORANDUM First reading for the City Council Meeting of May 10, 2016 Second reading for the City Council Meeting of May 17, 2016 (Tabled to next meeting) Second reading for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 DATE: April 15, 2016 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, P. E., Assistant City Manager markvv@cctexas.com (361) 826-3897 Valerie H. Gray, P. E., Executive Director of Public Works valerieg@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: Fred Segundo, Director of Aviation freds@cctexas.com (361) 289-0171 J. H. Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Engineering Construction Contract Award International Boulevard Improvements (BOND 2012 Proposition 8) CAPTION: Ordinance appropriating and approving a transfer in the amount of $236,810 from the Unreserved Fund Balance in No. 4612 Airport Operating Reserves Fund to and appropriating in Fund 3018 Airport Capital Reserve Fund; changing the FY 2016 Operating Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030620 to increase expenditures by $236,810; changing the FY 2016 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030621 to increase revenues and expenditures by $236,810 each; and authorizing the City Manager or designee, to execute a Construction contract with Bay, Ltd. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $1,683,694.35 for the International Boulevard Improvements project for the Base Bid and Additive Alternate No. 1. (BOND 2012 Proposition 8) PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is to execute a construction contract for the International Boulevard Improvements project (BOND 2012) and obtain authority to appropriate funds from the Airport Department to supplement the Bond 2012 Proposition 8. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: This project was approved in the Bond 2012 Proposition 8 Economic Development Project by the community in the general election held on November 6, 2012. Bond 2012 Brochure description: "International Boulevard — This project includes a combination of full depth pavement repair and resurfacing the existing entrance roadway looping from State Highway 44 through the Corpus Christi International Airport." This project includes a Base Bid with one Additive Alternative No. 1. The Base Bid includes pavement rehabilitation with minor utility improvements and replacement of the existing overhead signage for directions entering Corpus Christi International Airport (CCIA). Additive Alternative No. 1 provides for a new overhead directional sign for exiting the airport typical to most airports. The existing pavement is experiencing varying levels of distress that requires milling with a new 1.5" overlay to the existing Hot Mix Asphalt Concrete pavement with select full depth repairs. The existing drainage is rural section with roadside swales that require new "ribbon" curbs and minor grading/excavation. Utility improvements are limited to Water and Wastewater improvements for future service for potential development. The base bid includes replacement of the existing inbound overhead directional signage and new pavement markings. The additive alternate for the overhead directional signage with the green TxDOT highway background providing better directions when exiting onto Hwy 44 heading left to go to Robstown, or right to go to Corpus Christi as well as indicating routes to IH -37 and IH -69. On November 18, 2015, the City received proposals from two (2) bidders and the bidders are as follows: Contractor Base Bid Additive Alternate Berry Contracting L.P. dba Bay LTD Corpus Christi, Texas $1,543,638.35 $140,056.00 CPC Interest, LLC dba Clark Pipeline Services Corpus Christi, Texas $1,996,878.10 $214,674.90 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize execution of a construction contract. 2. Do not authorize execution of a construction contract. (Not Recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: LJA Engineering, Inc. (formally RVE Inc.) is the design engineer that was selected for this project under RFQ 2012-03. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Complies with statutory requirements for architectural and engineering contracts. Conforms to FY 2015-2016 Street Capital Improvement Planning (CIP) Budget. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Street Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue X Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Budget $1,689,642.91 275,000 $1,964,642.91 Ordinance —This Item 236,810 236,810 Total Budget $1,689,642.91 $511,810 $2,201,452.91 Encumbered / Expended Amount 204,600 204,600 Award - This item 1,638,694.35 1,638,694.35 Future Anticipated Expenditures This Project 357480.43 357,480.43 BALANCE 1,485,042.91 -1,484,364.78 678.13 Fund(s): ST 52 Comments: N/A RECOMMENDATION: City staff and LJA Engineering recommend the construction contract award to Bay, LTD in the amount of $1,683,694.35 for the International Boulevard Improvements BOND 2012 Prop 8 for the Base Bid and Alternate No. 1. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Project Budget Location Map Presentation Page 1 of 2 Ordinance appropriating and approving a transfer in the amount of $236,810 from the Unreserved Fund Balance in No. 4612 Airport Operating Reserves Fund to and appropriating in Fund 3018 Airport Capital Reserve Fund; changing the FY 2016 Operating Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030620 to increase expenditures by $236,810; changing the FY 2016 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030621 to increase revenues by $236,810; and authorizing the City Manager or designee, to execute a Construction contract with Bay, Ltd. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $1,683,694.35 for the International Boulevard Improvements project for the Base Bid and Additive Alternate No. 1. (BOND 2012 Proposition 8) BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. An amount of $236,810 from the Unreserved Fund Balance in Airport Operating Reserves Fund 4612 is appropriated and transferred to and appropriated in Airport Capital Reserve Fund No. 3018 Airport Capital Reserve Fund. SECTION 2. The FY 2016 Operating Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030620 is changed to increase expenditures in the amount of $236,810. SECTION 3. The FY 2016 Capital Improvement Program Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030621 is changed to increase revenues in the amount of $236,810. SECTION 4. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute a construction contract for the International Boulevard Improvements Project (Bond 2012) for the Base Bid and Additive Alternate No. 1 for the amount of $1,683,694.35 with Bay, Ltd of Corpus Christi, Texas. @BCL@BCO5F55D Page 2 of 2 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2016, by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2016, by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2016. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary @BCL@BCO5F55D Nelda Martinez Mayor PROJECT BUDGET International Boulevard Bond 2012 PROJECT FUNDS AVAILABLE: Street $ 1,325,000.00 CCIA International Boulevard( Bond 2012 Proposition 8) 800,000.00 Bond 2012 Proposition 8 Savings 275,000.00 Airport 250,000.00 Utilities 876,452.91 Water 128,496.86 Storm Water 639,956.05 Wastewater 108,000.00 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $ 2,201,452.91 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction: Construction (Berry Contacting, dba Bay, Ltd.) THIS ITEM 1,683,694.35 Street 930,883.15 Utilities 516,001.20 Water 33,415.00 Storm Water 423,812.70 Wastewater 58,773.50 Airport 236,810.00 Contingency (10%) 168,369.44 Construction Inspection and Testing: Construction Inspection (Estimate) 65,240.00 Construction Phase - Materials Testing Services (Rock Engineering) 14,424.00 Design: Engineer (RVE). Original Contact and 3 Amendments 177,147.00 Street 88,695.40 Airport 19,450.00 Utilities 69,001.60 Water 10,246.00 Storm Water 50,076.80 Wastewater 8,678.80 Design Phase - Geotechnical Study and Testing (Rock Engineering) 19,800.00 Reimbursements: Total Reimbursements 72,100.00 Contract Administration (Engineering Svcs Admin/Finance/Capital Budget) 31,100.00 Engineering Services (Project Mgt/Constr Mgt) 39,000.00 Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 2,000.00 TOTAL $ 2,200,774.79 ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE $ 678.13 S 4' BUO!TBUJOTU Q Project Location •• a i -11, i 1... '1 1 pp,11;��11n! ff '+eV -y12, if t1o� l.' Iworriramr '11N�•i�+41'^f,^il...rpr'9i9 �a+i IO'M:!,� dig, 4 rte+—=M-,r+-+ q.• • r til. ”. v a a.• .9�H.yfb 9H '�1 1 . VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE • Project Number: El [II 1 II II III 1 II II International Boulevard Improvements Bond 2012 CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Corpus Chr sti Engineering International Blvd BOND 2012 Proposition 8 Council Presentation May 10, 2016 Vicinity Map �hrsti Engineering edwick Rd SH 44 W o. .11.3 Christ International niaport ;01.4111$ Aa Project Location Bear Irri 2 Location Map Corpus Christi International Air ort Project Scope �hrsti Engineering Provides for a Base Bid with one Additive Alternative as follows: BASE BID: • Milling and a new 1.5" HMAC overlay (approximately 2000LF) • Select full depth repairs • New pavement markings • Minor storm water enhancements for roadside swales • Minor water & wastewater improvements for future development • Replacement of the existing overhead directional signage for inbound traffic to the airport ADDITIVE ALTERNATIVE NO. 1: • New overhead directional signage for traffic existing onto Hwy 44 to Robstown and Corpus Christi for Hwy 37 and Hwy 69 4 Project Schedule �hrsti Engineering 2013 2014 2015 2016 3rd Q 4th Q 1st Q 2nd Q 3rd Q 4th Q 1stQ I2ndQ 3rd Q 4th Q 1st Q 2nd Q 3rd Q Bid/Award 4th Q Project Estimate: 180 Calendar Days 6 Months CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties.OFFICE Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Bay Ltd. Corpus Christi, TX United States Certificate Number: 2016-44305 Date Filed: 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 04/22/2016 Date Acknowledged: 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the goods or services to be provided under the contract. E12137 Rehabilitation of International Drive Improvements (Bond 2012) 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. Mp omatorq,� X ti 6 AFFIDAVIT "0,, . \N� .... . ' YA �F� 4,1, I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. I 0 Gel ; ••Ig f •• .P1R• •Qt ignature of authorized agent of contracting bu`siiness entity AFFIX NOTARY STAIJA44 1114Beek Sworn/to ,this the � � day of I �01 7 ' jil fl Sworn to and subscribed before me, bythe said n ,r , 20 1 kLJ to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. 6.,e44;0L . /..e.ezry,a,._ zell'Aotal ty). si-grif 4dmikiaf Signature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath Fnrmc nrn. ii`1 ,-1 4..1 T..v...- i I.,;.... r......,......__.— www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of May 31, 2016 DATE: May 24, 2016 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Steven Viera, Interim Director of Human Resources SteveV(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-3445 Maria Pedraza, Procurement Manager MariaPe(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-3176 Temporary Staffing Services Service Agreement Extension CAPTION: Resolution ratifying one year contract extensions effective as of May 15, 2016, and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute one-year extensions to the service agreements with Unique Employment Services, Advance'd Temporaries, Inc., JAT Partners, LLC dba Remedy Intelligent Staffing, and Express Employment Professionals to continue the provision of temporary staffing services for a total expenditure not to exceed $9,057,000 of which approximately $3,773,750 is required for the remainder of the fiscal year. Unique Employment Services JAT Partners, LLC Corpus Christi, Texas Dba Remedy Intelligent Staffing $5,222,000 Corpus Christi, Texas $1,236,000 Advance'd Temporaries, Inc. Express Employment Professionals Corpus Christi, Texas Corpus Christi, Texas $2,500,000 $99,000 PURPOSE: Approval to extend service agreements with temporary staffing agencies to continue to provide temporary staffing to departments as needed for day-to-day operations. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: On 02/28/2012, staff inadvertently proposed to City Council to take action to approve service agreements for temporary staffing services with staffing agencies for terms of two years with options to extend for up to two additional years instead of the option to extend for up to three additional years as specified in the solicitation and service agreements signed by contractors acknowledging the additional three year -year extension terms. The term of the third one-year extension will extend the contractors' service agreements from May 15, 2016 through May 14, 2017. The contractors agree to be bound by the same terms and conditions specified in existing service agreements made effective May 15, 2012. Bid solicitations have been created to establish new temporary staffing agreements; however the Human Resources Department is currently in the process of transitioning to an in-house temporary staffing services program. The goal of this extension is to allow time for the Human Resources Department to develop and provide administrative control and oversight to the agreements and implement an internal City temporary employee program to reduce the City's dependency on staffing agencies. ALTERNATIVES: There are no other alternatives at this time to establish new service agreements in time. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: N/A CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This purchase conforms to the City's purchasing policies and procedures along with the State statutes regulating procurement. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: N/A DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Various City Departments FINANCIAL IMPACT: x Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $3,773,750 $5,283,250 $9,057,000 Encumbered / Expended Amount $0 $0 $0 This item $3,773,750 $5,283,250 $9,057,000 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 Fund(s): Various City Departments RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution, Presentation Extension III SA12-061 Extension III SA12-063 Extension III SA 12-064 Extension III SA12-065 „,,,. 1852 Service Agreement No.: SA12-065 Current Agreement Value: $410,886.30 AMENDMENT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION Amendment No.: 5 Date: May 11, 2016 The CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Express Employment Professionals, hereinafter referred to as the Contractor, do hereby make and enter into this Amendment which, together with the Contract and all other duly executed amendments, constitutes the entire agreement under the above -referenced Service Agreement between the City and the Contractor. Contractor agrees to comply with Texas Government Code section 2252.908 and complete Form 1295 "Certificate of Interested Parties” as part of this amendment. The contract is hereby extended for an additional twelve-month period. New effective dates are May 15, 2016 through May 14, 2017.. This amendment increases the current agreement value by an amount not to exceed $99,000 from $410,886.30 to a total contract amount not to exceed $509,886.30. Increased value is an estimated projection for extension year three. Contractor and the City agree to and shall abide by all terms and conditions of the original Contract and any amendments to that Contract, to the extent they are not in conflict with the terms of this Amendment. L" 1twt (. (UC f-0 S iw oicr Margot Villarreal Date Kim Baker Date General Manager Assistant Director of Finance Express Employment Professionals City of Corpus Christi, Texas CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Express Employment Professionals Corpus Christi, TX United States Certificate Number: 2016-55133 Date Filed: 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 05/13/2016 Date Acknowledged: 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. SA12-065 Staffing Services 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. X 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury. that the above disclosure is true and correct. . • State elites Signatufe of authorized agent of contracting business entity AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE Swyrn to and subscribed before me, by the said q Jj/'� 1.----i V1,--Q1CLOd ; this the \ day of C' -t (.t 20 y LP , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of o ice. 401 1111 -1.•iAn , . otax u rl'cJ Signature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath orms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 Resolution ratifying one year contract extensions effective as of May 15, 2016, and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute one year extensions to the service agreements with Unique Employment Services, Advance'd Temporaries, Inc., JAT Partners, LLC dba Remedy Intelligent Staffing, and Express Employment Professionals to continue the provision of temporary staffing services, for a total expenditure not to exceed $9,057,000 of which approximately $3,773,750 is required for the remainder of this fiscal year. WHEREAS, on February 28, 2012, staff inadvertently proposed that City Council approve temporary staffing service agreements (each for a term of two years) with options to extend for up to two additional one-year periods instead of including options to extend for up to three additional one-year periods, as was specified in both the solicitation and agreements signed by Unique Employment Services, Advance'd Temporaries, Inc., JAT Partners, LLC doing business as Remedy Intelligent Staffing, and Express Employment Professionals (collectively, the "Contractors"); WHEREAS, the term of the third one-year extension will extend the Contractors' respective services agreements from May 15, 2016, through May 14, 2017; WHEREAS, the Contractors agree to be bound by the same terms and conditions specified in the existing service agreements made effective on May 15, 2012; WHEREAS, bid solicitations have been created to establish new temporary staffing service agreements; however, the Human Resources Department ("HR") is currently in the process of transitioning to an in-house temporary staffing services program to hire temporary workers as City temporary employees to fulfill this need, as the in-house program will be more cost effective than procuring new multi-year service agreements with staffing agencies; and WHEREAS, the one-year term extensions to the existing agreements will allow sufficient time for HR to make the transition to the new in-house program. Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas: The City Council ratifies one-year contract extensions effective as of May 15, 2016, and authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute one-year extensions to the existing staffing service agreements with Unique Employment Services, Advance'd Temporaries, Inc., JAT Partners, LLC, doing business as Remedy Intelligent Staffing, and Express Employment, all of Corpus Christi, Texas, to continue providing temporary staffing services in accordance with the same terms and conditions in each respective service agreement made effective on May 15, 2012, for a total expenditure not to exceed $9,057,000 of which approximately $3,773,750 is required for the remainder of this fiscal year. ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta, City Secretary Nelda Martinez, Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas day of , 2016 The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Rudy Garza Michael Hunter Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Lucy Rubio Brian Rosas Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughn Temporary Staffing Services Service Agreement Extension Council Presentation May 24, 2016 DEPARTMENT Development Services Engineering Facilities Finance Fire Gas General Services 7 7 7 18 3 45 19 Health 5 Human Relations 1 Library 2 Marina 4 MIS 7 Neighborhood Services 2 Parks & Recreation 37 Police 6 Streets 3 Solid Waste 13 Utilities 37 Wastewater 1 Water 108 Temporary/ Leased Employee Summary Leased Worker Summary 1 Total 332 LEASED WORKER COUNT ■ Public Safety 9 Other 116 Public Safety 9 3% Utilities 207 2 Personnel Cost Summary Personnel Costs May 2015 -April 2016 $8,808,662; 4.02% $210,145,467; 95.98% ■ Salaries+fringe, Full-time employees Temporary Services • City's Total Payroll $210,145,467 (Full-time Employees) • Temporary Services $8,808,662 (Temporary/Leased Employees) • Temporary employees account for 4.02% of total City payroll. Hiring Cost Comparisons $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 Cost Comparisons - Hiring Options Temp Agency Direct Hire City Temp $8,808,661 $12,551,364 $8,211,082 ■ Fees / ACA / W -C /Agency markup ■ Benefits /Accruals ■ TMRS FICA ■ Salary 4 Future - City Temporary Program Fiscally Responsible " Efficient Processes " Sound Oversight Implementation Process: • Create a temporary candidate pool for current and future openings • Evaluate the performance of staffing agency employees at all tenure levels • Meet with departments to understand their staffing needs • Discuss the transitioning of current leased workers into open City positions 1882 AMENDMENT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION Service Agreement No.: SA12-061 Amendment No.: 23 Current Agreement Value: $12,395,078.42 Date: May 11, 2016 The CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Unique Employment Services hereinafter referred to as the Contractor, do hereby make and enter into this Amendment which, together with the Contract and all other duly executed amendments, constitutes the entire agreement under the above -referenced Service Agreement between the City and the Contractor. Contractor agrees to comply with Texas Government Code section 2252.908 and complete Form 1295 "Certificate of Interested Parties" as part of this amendment. The contract is hereby extended for an additional twelve-month period. New effective dates are May 15, 2016 through May 14, 2017. This amendment increases the current agreement value by an amount not to exceed $5,222,000.00 from $12,395,078.42 to a total contract amount not to exceed $17,617,078.42. Increased value is an estimated projection for extension year three. Contractor and the City agree to and shall abide by all terms and conditions of the original Contract and any amendments to that Contract, to the extent they are not in conflict with the terms of this Amendment. • 4 alb/ l ' G. ry B -•ford iDate Kim Baker Date esi•t/CEO Assistant Director of Finance Unique Employment Services City of Corpus Christi, Texas orms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-57180 Date Filed: 05/17/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Unique Employment Services Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. SA12-061 Leased Workers 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. X 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above ..closure is true and correct. 44EVELYN W. DESROSIERS li April 22, 2017 — My Commissbn Expires 4. 1 nature of authorize agent of cont • cting business entity AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said( -7f jee/ S t-Z(ZA'jN —zo (�.1, , this the _ ) 1 day of t•AMA , 20 )tP , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office.III j i C Signature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath orms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 AMENDMENT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION Service Agreement No.: SA12-063 Amendment No.: 23 Current Agreement Value: $6,323,555.95 Date: May 11, 2016 The CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Advance'd Temporaries, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the Contractor, do hereby make and enter into this Amendment which, together with the Contract and all other duly executed amendments, constitutes the entire agreement under the above -referenced Service Agreement between the City and the Contractor. Contractor agrees to comply with Texas Government Code section 2252.908 and complete Form 1295 "Certificate of Interested Parties" as part of this amendment. The contract is hereby extended for an additional twelve-month period. New effective dates are May 15, 2016 through May 14, 2017. This amendment increases the current agreement value by an amount not to exceed $2,500,000 from $6,323,555.95 to a total contract amount not to exceed $8,823,555.95. Increased value is an estimated projection for extension year three. Contractor and the City agree to and shall abide by all terms and conditions of the original Contract and any amendments to that Contract, to the extent they are not in conflict with the terms of this Amendment. /-j.-/Zz 5 f Felisha Moye c7 Date Vice President Advance'd Temporaries, Inc. Kim Baker Date Assistant Director of Finance City of Corpus Christi, Texas CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Advance'd Temporaries Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form Is being tiled. City of Corpus Christi OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-55469 Date Flied: 05/13/2016 Date Acknowledged; 3 Provide the Identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or Identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. SA12-063 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL Name of interested Party 5 Check only if there is NO interested Party. 6 AFFIDAVIT KRiSTI LOPE HOLDER "• *; MY COMMISSION I,.XPIRES Aprli 24, 2017 AFFIX NOTARY STAMP 1 SEAL ABOVE Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said 20 t(i , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of Interest (check applicable) Controlling intermediary I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct, Signatur- uthorized agent of contracting business entity L Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us gnature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath is the f day of Title of office administering oath Version V1.0.1021 AMENDMENT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION Service Agreement No.: SA12-064 Amendment No.: 5 Current Agreement Value: $3,284,680.09 Date: May 11, 2016 The CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, hereinafter referred to as the City, and JAT Partners LLC, DBA Remedy Intelligent Staffing, hereinafter referred to as the Contractor, do hereby make and enter into this Amendment which, together with the Contract and all other duly executed amendments, constitutes the entire agreement under the above - referenced Service Agreement between the City and the Contractor. Contractor agrees to comply with Texas Government Code section 2252.908 and complete Form 1295 "Certificate of Interested Parties" as part of this amendment. The contract is hereby extended for an additional twelve-month period. New effective dates are May 15, 2016 through May 14, 2017. This amendment increases the current agreement value by an amount not to exceed $1,236,000 from $3,284,680.09 to a total contract amount not to exceed $4,520,680.09. Increased value is an estimated projection for extension year three. Contractor and the City agree to and shall abide by all terms and conditions of the original Contract and any amendments to that Contract, to the extent they are not in conflict with the terms of this Amendment. 5y/3 Penny R:se Date Branch Manage JAT Partners LLC, DBA Remedy Intelligent Staffing Kim Baker Date Assistant Director of Finance City of Corpus Christi, Texas r CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-54565 Date Filed: 05/12/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. JAT Partners LLC dba Remedy Intelligent Staffing Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi g Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. SA12-064 Leased Worker Services 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO interested Party. ❑ X 6 --------_ AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. oma'?' boe I_AURIS A LYNN BAKLIK my commission Expires .Ar7-6 :2, 2019 fj _ AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE , Signature off authorized agent f contracting business entity �'P,-P___., this the i 3 day of X11, Sworny,to and subscribed before me, by the said 142- u! 20 1 l l7 to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. r iSolu 1111 � )� R ,.K I �ni � , - -cit U L Cla3 . �11 ,4 na.) \� Sigcure of officer admini' 'r oath Printed name of officer administeri'e oath Title of officer administeringoath g i Forms provided b9Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.bc.us Version V1.0.1021 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of May 31, 2016 DATE: May 4, 2016 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, P. E., Assistant City Manager markvv@cctexas.com (361) 826-3897 Valerie H. Gray, P. E., Executive Director of Public Works valerieg@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: J. H. Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 CAPTION: Engineering Design Services North Padre Island Beach Access Roads 3A and 2 BOND 2014 Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a contract for engineering design services with Govind Development, LLC. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $73,935.00 for the North Padre Island Beach Access Roads 3A & 2. BOND 2014 Proposition 2. PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is to obtain authority to execute an engineering design contract for the North Padre Island Beach Access Roads 3A & 2 project. (BOND 2014 Prop. 2). BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: This project was approved in the Bond 2014 Proposition 2 Street Safety, Revitalization and Capacity Improvement Projects by the community in the general election held on November 4, 2014. Bond 2014 Brochure description: "North Padre Island Beach Access Roads (3A and 2) — This project includes reconstruction of Beach Access Roads on North Padre Island, including Beach Access Roads 3A, and consideration will be given to other beach access roads for which the City has the responsibility of maintaining as funding allows." Beach Access Roads 3A and 2 provide direct access to the beach and are in poor condition. The roads are designated as C-1 collector streets with 50 -ft minimum ROW and a design speed of 15 MPH. Beach Access Road 2 is located north of the Packery Channel, while Beach Access Road 3A is located south of the Packery Channel. The proposed improvements include replacing the existing Hot -Mix -Asphalt - Concrete (HMAC) with reinforced concrete pavement structure with required grading for drainage, slope and soil stabilization, pavement markings, and signage. During preliminary design it was determined that the existing Beach Access Road 3A was constructed slightly out of the City Easement and therefore required relocation. The property owner requested the City relocate the roadway to the eastern edge of the property to minimize the impact to future development. This allowed a closer alignment with Wind Jammer and shorter roadway length to the beach. This will require a land "swap" with no additional land acquisition cost. Access Road 2 will be reconstructed at the existing location. The construction is planned for the fall to minimize impacts to peak seasonal activities. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize execution of an engineering design contract. 2. Do not authorize execution of an engineering design contract. (Not Recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Govind Development, LLC. is the design engineer that was selected for this project under RFQ 2014-08. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Complies with statutory requirements for architectural and engineering contracts. Conforms to FY 2015- 2016 Street Capital Improvement Planning (CIP) Budget. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Street Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue X Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Budget $0.00 $3,500,000.00 $3,500,000.00 This item $0.00 $73,935.00 $73,935.00 Future Anticipated Expenditures This Project $0.00 $2,058,791.00 $2,058,791.00 BALANCE $0.00 $1,367,274.00 $1,367,274.00 Fund(s): ST 25 Comments: N/A RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends the engineering design contract with Govind Development, LLC. in the amount of $73,935.00 for the North Padre Island Beach Access Roads 3A & 2 BOND 2014 project. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Project Budget Location Map Presentation PROJECT BUDGET North Padre Island Beach Access Roads 3A & 2 Bond 2014 PROJECT FUNDS AVAILABLE: Bond 2014 $ 3,500,000.00 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $ 3,500,000.00 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction: Construction (estimate) 1,500,000.00 Contingency (10%) 150,000.00 Construction Inspection and Testing: Construction Inspection (Estimate) 122,500.00 Construction Phase - Materials Testing Services (estimate) (TBD) 15,000.00 Design: Engineer (Govind) Preliminary Design 49,200.00 Engineer (Govind) Engineering Design THIS ITEM 73,935.00 Design Phase - Geotechnical Services (Tolunay-Wong) 13,285.00 Reimbursements: Total Reimbursements 204,750.00 Contract Administration (Engineering Svcs Admin/Finance/Capital Budget) 78,750.00 Engineering Services (Project Mgt/Constr Mgt) 122,500.00 Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 3,500.00 Other: Staff Augmentation 4,056.00 TOTAL $ 2,132,726.00 ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE $ 1,367,274.00 75. EBI) Mustang Mustang rsJand State Park 1 I 113 06. Beach Access Road 3A VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Beach Access Road 2 Project Number: E15111 North Padre Island Beach Access Roads 3A and 2 Bond 2014, Prop. 2 CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES The City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home rule municipal corporation, P.O. Box 9277, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas 78469-9277 (City) acting through its duly authorized City Manager or Designee (Director of Engineering Services) and Govind Development, LLC., a limited liability corporation, 9510 Leopard Street, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas 78410, (Consultant), hereby agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF PROJECT E15111 North Padre Island Beach Access Roads 3A and 2 — This project includes reconstruction of Beach Access Roads on North Padre Island, including Beach Access Roads 3A, and consideration will be given to other beach access roads for which the City has the responsibility of maintaining as funding allows. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES The Consultant hereby agrees to perform services to complete the Project, as detailed in Exhibit "A". In addition, Consultant will provide monthly status updates (project progress or delays presented with monthly invoices) and provide contract administration services, as described in Exhibit "A", to complete the Project. Work will not begin on Additional Services until requested by the Consultant (provide breakdown of costs, schedules), and written authorization is provided by the Director of Engineering Services. 3. ORDER OF SERVICES The Consultant agrees to begin work on those authorized Basic Services for this contract upon receipt of the Notice to Proceed from the Director of Engineering Services. Work will not begin on any phase or any Additional Services until requested in writing by the Consultant and written authorization is provided by the Director of Engineering Services. The anticipated schedule of the preliminary phase, design phase, bid phase, and construction phase is shown on Exhibit "A". This schedule is not to be inclusive of all additional time that may be required for review by the City staff and may be amended by or with the concurrence of the Director of Engineering Services. The Director of Engineering Services may direct the Consultant to undertake additional services or tasks provided that no increase in fee is required. Services or tasks requiring an increase of fee will be mutually agreed and evidenced in writing as an amendment to this contract. Consultant shall notify the City of Corpus Christi within three (3) days of notice if tasks requested requires an additional fee. 4. FEE The City will pay the Consultant a fee as described in Exhibit "A" for providing services authorized, a total fee not to exceed $73,935.00. Monthly invoices will be submitted in accordance with Exhibit "B". Contract for Professional Services Page 1 of 5 KIENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGEIANGIEMISTREET\E15111 NORTH PADRE ISLAND BEACH ACCESS ROADS 3A AND 2 AGENDA ITEM116-0311 AE AGREEMENT.DOC 5. INDEMNITY Consultant shall fully indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi and its officials, officers, agents, employees, or other entity, excluding the engineer or architect or that person's agent, employee or subconsultant, over which the City exercises control ("Indemnitee") from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, to the extent that the damage is caused by or results from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property infringement or failure to pay a subcontractor or supplier committed by Consultant or its agent, Consultant under contract or another entity over which Consultant exercises control while in the exercise of rights or performance of the duties under this agreement. This indemnification does not apply to any liability resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the City or its employees, to the extent of such negligence. Consultant shall defend Indemnitee, with counsel satisfactory to the City Attorney, from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, if the claim is not based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee. If a claim is based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee, the Consultant shall reimburse the City's reasonable attorney's fees in proportion to the Consultant's liability. Consultant must advise City in writing within 24 hours of any claim or demand against City or Consultant known to Consultant related to or arising out of Consultant's activities under this Agreement. 6. INSURANCE Consultant agrees to comply with the insurance requirements in Exhibit C. 7. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT The City may terminate this contract for convenience upon seven days written notice to the Consultant at the address of record. The City may terminate this agreement for cause upon ten days written notice to the Consultant. If Consultant begins, within three days of receipt of such notice, to correct its failure and proceeds to diligently cure such failure within the ten days, the agreement will not terminate. In the event of termination, the Consultant will be compensated for its services on all stages authorized based upon Consultant and City's estimate of the proportion of the total services actually completed at the time of termination. 8. LOCAL PARTICIPATION The City Council's stated policy is that City expenditures on contracts for professional services be of maximum benefit to the local economy. Contract for Professional Services Page 2 of 5 K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGEIANGIEMISTREETtE15111 NORTH PADRE ISLAND BEACH ACCESS ROADS 3A AND 21AGENDA ITEM116-0311 AE AGREEMENT.DOC 9. ASSIGNABILITY The Consultant will not assign, transfer or delegate any of its obligations or duties in this contract to any other person without the prior written consent of the City, except for routine duties delegated to personnel of the Consultant staff. If the Consultant is a partnership, then in the event of the termination of the partnership, this contract will inure to the individual benefit of such partner or partners as the City may designate. No part of the Consultant fee may be assigned in advance of receipt by the Consultant without written consent of the City. The City will not pay the fees of expert or technical assistance and consultants unless such employment, including the rate of compensation, has been approved in writing by the City. 10.OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS All documents including contract documents (plans and specifications), record drawings, contractor's field data, inspection reports and submittal data will be the sole property of the City, may not be used again by the Consultant without the express written consent of the Director of Engineering Services. However, the Consultant may use standard details that are not specific to this project. The City agrees that any modification of the plans will be evidenced on the plans, and be signed and sealed by a professional engineer prior to re -use of modified plans. 11. STANDARD OF CARE Services provided by Consultant under this Agreement shall be performed with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by competent engineers or architects practicing in the same or similar locality and under the same or similar circumstances and professional license; and performed as expeditiously as is prudent considering the ordinary professional skill and care of a competent engineer or architect. 12. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Consultant agrees to comply with City of Corpus Christi Ordinance No. 17112 and complete the Disclosure of Interests form as part of this contract. 13. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES For contracts that exceed $50,000, Consultant agrees to comply with Texas Government Code section 2252.908 and complete Form 1295 Certificate of Interested Parties as part of this agreement. Form 1295 requires disclosure of "interested parties" with respect to entities that enter contracts with cities. These interested parties include: (1) persons with a "controlling interest" in the entity, which includes: a. an ownership interest or participating interest in a business entity by virtue of units, percentage, shares, stock or otherwise that exceeds 10 percent; Contract for Professional Services Page 3 of 5 KIENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGEIANGIEM\STREET1E1S111 NORTH PADRE ISLAND BEACH ACCESS ROADS 3A AND 2 AGENDA ITEM116-0311 AE AGREEMENT.DOC b. membership on the board of directors or other governing body of a business entity of which the board or other governing body is composed of not more than 10 members; or c. service as an officer of a business entity that has four or fewer officers, or service as one of the four officers most highly compensated by a business entity that has more than four officers. (2) a person who actively participates in facilitating a contract or negotiating the terms of a contract with a governmental entity or state agency, including a broker, intermediary, adviser or attorney for the business entity. Form 1295 must be electronically filed with the Texas Ethics Commission at https://www.ethics.state.tx.us/whatsnew/elf info form1295.htm. The form must then be printed, signed, notarized and filed with the City. For more information, please review the Texas Ethics Commission Rules at https://www.ethics.state.tx.us/legal/ch46.html. 14.CONFLICT OF INTEREST Consultant agrees to comply with Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Government Code and file Form CIQ with the City Secretary's Office, if required. For more information and to determine if you need to file a Form 010, please review the information on the City Secretary's website at http://www.cctexas.com/governmenticity-secretary/conflict- disclosure/index. 15. ENTIRE AGREEMENT AND CONTROLLING LAW This Agreement represents the entire and integrated Agreement between City and Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either oral or written. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both the City and Consultant. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Texas without regard to its conflicts of laws. Venue for legal proceedings lies exclusively in Nueces County, Texas. 16. CONFLICT RESOLUTION BETWEEN DOCUMENTS Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges if anything contained in the Consultant - prepared Exhibit A, Consultant's Scope of Services, or contained in any other document prepared by Consultant and included herein, is in conflict with this Agreement, this Agreement shall take precedence and control to resolve said conflict. Contract for Professional Services Page 4 of 5 K:SENGINEER1NG DATAEXCHANGEWNGIEMSSTREET\E15i 11 NORTH PADRE ISLAND BEACH ACCESS ROADS 3A AND 2\AGENDA ITEM416-0311 RE AGREEMENT.DOC CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI GOVIND DEVELOPMENT, LLC. J. H. Edmonds, P.E. Date Ajmer Kular, P.E. Date Director of Engineering Services Vice President 9510 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, Texas 78410 (361) 241-2777 Office akular@govinddevelopment.com RECOMMENDED Operating Department Date APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Legal Department APPROVED Date Office of Management Date and Budget ATTEST Rebecca Huerta Date City Secretary Project No. E15111 Accounting Unit: 3551-051 Account: 550950 Activity: E15111013551 EXP Account Category: 50950 Fund Name: Street CIP BOND 2014 Encumbrance No. Contract for Professional Services Page 5 of 5 K:IENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE ANGIENASTREET\E15111 NORTH PADRE ISLAND BEACH ACCESS ROADS 3A AND 21AGENDA ITEMNG-0311 AE AGREEMENT.DOC LVOV/NB VELOPMENT, LLC ENO/NEER/NO DIVISION Jeff Edmonds, P.E, Director of Engineering Services City of Corpus Christi PO BOX 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 Re: Contract for Professional Services North Padre Island Beach Access Roads 3A & 2 (Bond 2014 - Prop 2) Project No. E 1511 I Dear Mr. Edmonds: April 14. 2016 Please find enclosed the Proposed Contract (Exhibit A- I) for Professional Services for the subject project. The basic services fees include a detailed design phase, bidding phase and construction phase. The additional services fees include hydraulic and hydrologic modeling and analysis, traffic control planning and design, and engineering data and documentation needed for Texas General Land Office Permits and Nueces County Permits. If you have any questions please feel free to contact meat (361) 241-2777, Sincerely, Ajmer Kular, P.E. Vice President — Civil/Structural Department Govind Development, LLC —TBPE Firm No. 10101 9510 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, Texas 78410 EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 11 EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS NORTH PADRE ISLAND BEACH ACCESS ROADS (3A & 2) PROJECT NO. E15111 BOND ISSUE 2014, PROP 2 I. SCOPE OF SERVICES A. BASIC SERVICES For the purpose of this contract, Preliminary Phase may include Schematic Design and Design Phase services may include Design Development as applicable to Architectural services. 1. Preliminary Phase. The Architect/Engineer-A/E (also referred to as Consultant) will: h) gyp. Prepare preliminary opinions of probable construction coetc for the ecrved. requirements, • EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 11 required per City Plan Preparation Standards Contract Format professional -design, Include cxicting site-hotos. eft, the -Draft -Engineering -Letter -Report, City staff will provide one set only of the following information (as applicable): a) Electronic index and database of City's record drawing and record information. b) Requested record drawings, record information in electronic format as available from City Engineering files. b) The preliminary budget, specifying the funds available for construction. c) A copy of existing studies and plans. (as available from City Engineering files). d) Field location of existing city utilities. (NE to coordinate with City Operating Department) e) Applicable Master Plans and GIS mapping are available on the City's website. f) City Control survey Bench marks and coordinates. g) Preliminary Traffic impact assessment. EXHIBIT "A" Page 3 of 11 The records provided for A/E's use under this contract are proprietary, copyrighted, and authorized for use only by A/E, and ,gai g for the intended purpose of this project. Any unauthorized use or distribution of the records provided under this contract is strictly prohibited. 2. Design Phase. Upon approval of the preliminary phase, designated by receiving authorization to proceed, the A/E will: a) Provide coordination with electric and communication utility companies and private pipeline companies that may have existing facilities and must relocated to accommodate the proposed improvements. b) Provide assistance to identify testing, handling and disposal of any hazardous materials and/or contaminated soils that may be discovered during construction (to be included under additional services). c) Prepare construction documents in City standard format for the work identified in the approved ELR. Construction plans to include improvements or modifications to the storm water, water and wastewater systems within the project limits. Include standard City of Corpus Christi detail sheets as appropriate. It is assumed that onlv one design bid package will be used for both Beach Access Roads. If at anv time the City requests separate bid packages the A/E will re -negotiate fees for this phase to accommodate the Citv's request. d) Prepare construction plans in compliance with CPPSCF using English units on 11"x 17". 1. Prepare Traffic Control and Construction Sequencing Plans. The TCP will include construction sequencing, typical cross section and construction phasing plan sheets, waming and barricades, as well as standards sheets for barricades, traffic control plan, work zone pavement markings and signage. 2. Provide Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, including construction drawings. e) Furnish one (1) set of the interim plans (60% submittal - electronic and hard copies using City Standards as applicable) to the City staff for review and approval purposes with estimates of probable construction costs. Identify distribution list for plans and bid documents to all affected franchise utilities. 1. Required with the interim plans is a "Plan Executive Summary. project checklist & drawing checklist" which will identify and summarize the project by distinguishing key elements and opinion of probable project costs. 2. Attend 60% submittal meeting with City Staff to assist staff in review of 60% submittal. f) Hold Project 60% review meeting. Prepare meeting agenda and distribute meeting minutes to attendees within five working days of the meeting. Assimilate all review comments, as appropriate and, upon Notice to Proceed. EXHIBIT "A" Page 4 of 11 i) Provide one (1) set of the final (100%) plans (unsealed and unstamped - electronic and full-size hard copy using City Standards as applicable) for City's final review. j) Assimilate all final review comments Upon approval by the Director of Engineering Services, provide one (1) set of the final plans and contract documents (electronic and full-size hard copy using City Standards as applicable) suitable for reproduction. Said bid documents henceforth become the shared intellectual property of the City of Corpus Christi and the Consultant. The City agrees that any modifications of the submitted final plans (for other uses by the City) will be evidenced on the plans and be signed and sealed by a professional engineer prior to re -use of modified plans. k) Provide Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) measures to ensure that all submittals of the interim, pre -final (if required), and final complete plans and complete bid documents with specifications accurately reflect the percent completion designated and do not necessitate an excessive amount of revision and correction by City. Additional revisions or design submittals are required (and within the scope of Consultant's duties under this contract) if, in the opinion of the City Engineer or designee, Consultant has not adequately addressed City - provided review comments or provided submittals in accordance with City standards.. I) Prepare and submit Monthly Status Reports to the Project Manager no later than the last Wednesday of each month with action items developed from monthly progress and review meetings. See Exhibit "A-2" for required form. m) Provide copy of contract documents along with appropriate fee to Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR) for review and approval of accessibility requirements for pedestrian improvements (as authorized by Additional Services). The City staff will: a) Designate an individual to have responsibility, authority, and control for coordinating activities for the construction contract awarded. b) Provide the budget for the Project specifying the funds available for the construction contract. c) Provide electronic copy of the City's standard specifications, standard detail sheets, standard and special provisions, and forms for required bid documents. 3. Bid Phase. The A/E will: a) Prepare draft Authorization to Advertise (ATA). b) Participate in the pre-bid conference and provide a meeting agenda for critical construction activities and elements impacted the project. c) Assist the City in solicitation of bids by identification of prospective bidders, and review of bids by solicited interests. d) Review all pre-bid questions and submissions concerning the bid documents and prepare, in the City's format, for the Engineering Services' approval, any addenda or other revisions necessary to inform contractors of approved changes prior to bidding. e) Attend bid opening, analyze bids, evaluate, prepare bid tabulation, and make recommendation concerning award of the contract. f) In the event the lowest responsible bidder's bid exceeds the project budget as revised by the Engineering Services in accordance with the A/E's design phase estimate required above, the Engineer will, at its expense, confer with City staff EXHIBIT "A" Page 5of11 g) and make such revisions to the bid documents as the City staff deems necessary to re -advertise that particular portion of the Project for bids. Prepare Agenda Memoranda and PowerPoint presentation in City format for City Council Meeting. The City staff will: a) Arrange and pay for printing of all documents and addenda to be distributed to prospective bidders. b) Advertise the Project for bidding, maintain the list of prospective bidders, receive and process deposits for all bid documents, issue (with the assistance of the A/E) any addenda, prepare and supply bid tabulation forms, and conduct bid opening. c) Receive the Engineer's recommendation concerning bid evaluation and recommendation and prepare agenda materials for the City Council conceming bid awards. d) Prepare, review and provide copies of the contract for execution between the City and the contractor. 4. Construction Administration Phase. The A/E will perform contract administration to include the following: a) Participate in pre -construction meeting conference and provide a recommended agenda for critical construction activities and elements impacted the project. b) Review, Contractor submittals and operating and maintenance manuals for conformance to contract documents. c) Review and interpret field and laboratory tests. d) Provide interpretations and clarifications of the contract documents for the contractor and authorize required changes, which do not affect the contractor's price and are not contrary to the general interest of the City under the contract. e) Make regular visits to the site of the Project to confer with the City project inspector and contractor to observe the general progress and quality of work, and to determine, in general, if the work is being done in accordance with the contract documents. This will not be confused with the project representative observation or continuous monitoring of the progress of construction. f) Prepare change orders as authorized by the City; provide interpretations and clarifications of the plans and specifications for the contractor and authorize minor changes which do not affect the contractor's price and are not contrary to the general interest of the City under the contract. g) Review, evaluate and recommend for City consideration Contractor Value Engineering proposal. h) Attend final inspection with City staff, provide punch list items to the City's Construction Engineers for contractor completion, and provide the City with a Certificate of Completion for the project upon successful completion of the project. i) Review Contractor -provided construction "red -line" drawings. Prepare Project record drawings and provide a reproducible set and electronic file (AutoCAD r.14 or later) within two (2) months of final acceptance of the project. All drawings shall be CADD drawn using dwg format in AutoCAD, and graphics data will be in dxf format with each layer being provided in a separate file. Attribute data will be provided in ASCII format in tabular form. All electronic data will be compatible with the City GIS system. The City staff will: EXHIBIT "A" Page 6 of 11 a) Prepare applications/estimates for payments to contractor. b) Conduct the final acceptance inspection with the Engineer. B. ADDITIONAL SERVICES This section defines the scope of additional services that may only be included as part of this contract if authorized by the Director of Engineering Services. A/E may not begin work on any services under this section without specific written authorization by the Director of Engineering Services. Fees for Additional Services are an allowance for potential services to be provided and will be negotiated by the Director of Engineering Services as required. The A/E shall, with written authorization by the Director of Engineering Services, perform the following:: 1. Permit Preparation. Furnish the City all engineering data and documentation necessary for all required permits. The A/E will prepare this documentation for all required signatures. The A/E will prepare and submit identified permits as applicable to the appropriate local, state, and federal authorities, including: in the arca n \A/etlandc Delineation and Permit d. Temporary Dischargo Permit All g. Nueces County h. Texas Historical Commission (THC) 1. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) �. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) m. Texas General Land Office (TGLO) Research plats, ROW maps, deed, easements, and survey for fence comers, EXHIBIT "A" Page 7 of 11 3. 4. 5. Enginmring Cnncultant SUE. ruses. EXHIBIT "A" Page 8 of 11 b) utility facilities, such as manholes, vaivo boxes, posts, etc., and Vis. Level C. sem- 7. Construction Observation Services. To Be Determined. 8. 9. EXHIBIT "A" Page 9 of 11 10. Hydraulic and Hydrologic Modeling and Analysis. NE will provide a hydraulic and hydrologic analysis for the drainaae basin of Beach Access Road 3A. A/E will use the analysis to evaluate and model the existing storm water system and provide recommendations for improvements. A/E will provide an electronic copy of the model to City. 11. Traffic Control Planning and Design. A/E will provide an engineered traffic control plan for this project. The traffic control plan design will include multiple phases, signage, traffic calming devices, pavement markings and will adhere to TMUTCD standards. A/E will coordinate the traffic control plan design with affected adiacent property owners and emergency services. Provide the services above authorized in addition to those items shown on Exhibit "A-1" Task List, which provides supplemental description to Exhibit "A". Note: The Exhibit "A-1" Task List does not supersede Exhibit "A". II. SCHEDULE Date Activity May 23, 2016 60% Submittal June 3, 2016 City Review June 27, 2016 100% Submittal July 11, 2016 City Review August 1, 2016 Final Submittal August 10, 2016 Advertise for Bids August 23, 2016 Pre -Bid Conference September 6, 2016 Receive Bids September 27, 2016 Contract Award October 3, 2016 Begin Construction March 6, 2016 Complete Construction III. FEES A. Fee for Basic Services. The City will pay the A/E a fixed fee for providing for all "Basic Services" authorized as per the table below. The fees for Basic Services will not exceed those identified and will be full and total compensation for all services outlined in Section I.A.1-4 above, and for all expenses incurred in performing these services. The fee for this project is subject to the availability of funds. The Engineer may be directed to suspend work pending receipt and appropriation of funds. For services provided, A/E will submit monthly statements for services rendered. The statement will be based upon A/E's estimate (and with City's concurrence) of the proportion of the total services actually completed at the time of billing. City will make prompt monthly payments in response to A/E's monthly statements. EXHIBIT "A" Page 10 of 11 B. Fee for Additional Services. For services authorized by the Director of Engineering Services under Section I.B. "Additional Services," the City will pay the A/E a not -to -exceed fee as per the table below: Summary of Fees Basic Services Fees 1. Preliminary Phase $0 2. Design Phase $66,135 3. Bid Phase $2,750 4. Construction Administration Phase $1,250 Subtotal Basic Services Fees $70,135 Additional Services Fees (Allowance) 1. Permit Preparation $1,800 2. ROW Acquisition Survey $0 3. Topographic Survey and Parcel Descriptions* $0 4. Environmental Issues* To Be Determined 5. Public Involvement* $0 6. Subsurface Utility Investigation $0 7. Construction Observation Services To Be Determined 8. Warranty Phase To Be Determined 9. Franchise Utility Coordination $0 10. Hydraulic and Hydrologic Modeling and Analysis $1,000 11. Traffic Control Planning and Design $1,000 Sub Total Additional Services Fees Authorized $3,800 Total Authorized Fee $73,935 *Additional Services which are requested to be authorized in coordination with the notice to proceea Tor Basic Services. EXHIBIT "A" Page 11 of 11 Basic Services: Preliminary Phase Design Phase Bid Phase Report Phase Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Additional Services: Permitting Warranty Phase Inspection Platting Survey Reporting O & M Manuals SCADA Subtotal Additional Services Summary of Fees Basic Services Fees Additional Services Fees Total of Fees COMPLETE PROJECT NAME Project No. xxxxxx Invoice No. 12345 Invoice Date: Total Amount Previous Total Percent Contract Amd No. 1 Amd No. 2 Contract Invoiced Invoice Invoice Complete $15,117 $0 $0 $15,117 $0 $1,000 $1,000 7% 20,818 0 0 20,818 1,000 500 1,500 7% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n/a 14,166 0 0 14,166 0 0 0 n/a 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $50,101 $0 $0 $50,101 $750 $1,500 $2,500 5% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 O n/a 9,011 0 0 9,011 0 0 0 0% 29,090 0 0 29,090 0 0 0 0% 1,294 0 0 1,294 0 0 0 0% TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 0% TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0% $39,395 $0 $0 $39,395 $0 $0 $0 0% $50,101 $0 $0 $50,101 $750 $1,500 $2,500 5% 39,395 0 0 39,395 0 0 0 0% $89,496 $0 $0 $89,496 $750 $1,500 $2,500 3% EXHIBIT C Insurance Requirements Pre -Design, Design and General Consulting Contracts 1.1 Consultant must not commence work under this agreement until all required insurance has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Consultant must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. 1.2 Consultant must furnish to the Director of Engineering Services with the signed agreement a copy of Certificates of Insurance (COI) with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. A waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with COI. Project name and or number must be listed in Description Box of COI. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -written day notice of cancellation, required on all certificates or by applicable policy endorsements Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY (Errors and Omissions) $1,000,000 Per Claim (Defense costs shall be outside policy limits) If claims made policy, retro date must be prior to inception of agreement, have extended reporting period provisions and identify any limitations regarding who is insured. 1.3 In the event of accidents of any kind related to this agreement, Consultant must furnish the City with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. 1.4 Consultant shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Consultant's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. Consultant is required to provide City with renewal Certificates. EXHIBIT "C" Page 1 of 2 1.5 Consultant shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Consultant shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Engineering Services P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 1.6 Consultant agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: 1.6.1 Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation, non -renewal or material change in coverage, and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. 1.7 Within five (5) calendar days of a suspension, cancellation or non -renewal of coverage, Consultant shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Consultant's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 1.8 In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Consultant's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Consultant to remove the exhibit hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) if any, which become due to Consultant hereunder until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. 1.9 Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Consultant's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this agreement. 1.10 It is agreed that Consultant's insurance shall be deemed primary and non- contributory with respect to any insurance or self-insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this agreement. 1.11 It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. EXHIBIT "C" Page 2 of 2 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST City of Carp sti City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the c)uestion is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definitions. COMPANYNAME: Govind Development, LLC. P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: 9510 Leopard Street FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 4. Association e CITY: Corpus Christi ZIP: 78410 2. Partnership 5. Other 3. Sole Owner ❑ DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each `employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm.' Name Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Board, Commission or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an `ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Consultant FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Ajmer Kular, P.E. Title: Vice President (Type or Print) Signature of Certifying Date: Person: DEFINITIONS a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. g. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1011 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-47040 Date Filed: 04/28/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Govind Development, LLC Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods or other property to be provided under the contract. E15111 Engineering Services 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary Nadkarni, Govind Corpus Christi, TX United States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. ID 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear. or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. / j f 1 1 jPsµpILIk SANDRA LUZ LARA Natary ID # 125406924 ?^�� My Commission Expires e,, May 23rtorTE, 2019 11 I ' sr-r ignature of authorized agent of contracting business entity L/ �1 IC u.V).V , this the r _. day of (Li.. , AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE Sworn/ to and subscribed before me, by the said 20 1 (.o , to certify which, witness my hand timer and seal of office. Sa.r :O. tArL. t awl KVAeori PtiblAr d mar ! OI Signature of o' ..m cath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of oxer administering oath Jfn9 Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx,us Version V1,0,1021 Astlirme WOO ysM ,"7#••=--V-''':.9.-70P‘'.e..,-.,-;4.6cgr—vxr,--...:•• .. - Corpus Chr sti Engineering North Padre Island Beach Access Roads (3A & 2) BOND 2014 Proposition 2 Council Presentation May 24, 2016 Project Vicinity �hrsti Engineering Project Locatio 51) Mustang Island Mu sfa ng fs land S1afe Park 61 Beach Access Road 3A 1,` Beach Access Road 2 2 Project Location �hrsti Engineering GULF OF MEXICO HIGHWAY 361 BEACH ACCESS ROAD 2 3 Project Scope �hrsti Engineering Existing conditions include: Beach Access Road 3A • Full reconstruction of the existing 2 -lane HMAC roadway with new 850LF concrete 2 -lane roadway with new slope protection, markings and signage • New concrete roadway will be relocated closer to the beach to minimize the impact for future development of the property • A land swap was proposed by the property owner at no additional cost Beach Access Road 2 • Full reconstruction of the existing 2 -lane HMAC roadway with new 1450LF concrete 2 -lane roadway with new slope protection, markings and signage • Requires minor storm water culvert improvements 4 Project Schedule �hrsti Engineering 2015 2016 2017 Nov Dec Jan Fe b Mar Apr May L Design 111 Jun Jul Aug Bid Se p Oct Nov De c Jan Construction Construction Estimate: 150 Calendar Days 5 Months AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of May 31, 2016 DATE: May 24, 2016 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Maria Pedraza, Procurement Manager mariape(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-3176 Jim Davis, Director of General Services iimdcctexas.com (361) 826-1909 Stacie Talbert, Interim Director of Parks & Recreation StacitT(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-3464 Purchase of 4,000 Gallon Water Truck CAPTION: Motion approving the purchase of a 4,000 gallon water truck from Rush Truck Centers of Texas, L.P. of Houston, Texas, for a total cost of $125,406.00. The award is based on the cooperative purchasing agreement with the Houston -Galveston Area Council (H - GAC). Funding is available in the General Fund FY 2015-2016. PURPOSE: To approve the purchase of the 4,000 gallon water truck for the Parks & Recreation Department. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: This unit will replace the 4000 gallon water truck that is currently being rented on a monthly basis for $5,436.00 per month. This equipment is needed to enable Beach Operations to maintain driving lanes along the Gulf Beaches and to reduce the amount of motor grader and front-end loader time on the sand. Utilizing the water truck for this beach operation has proven to be very beneficial; therefore, the Parks & Recreation Department recommends purchasing a water truck to allow this operation to continue at a reduced cost. ALTERNATIVES: None. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: The Park & Recreation Department can continue to rent a 4,000 water truck at a higher rate than the outright purchase. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This purchase conforms to the City's purchasing policies and procedures and State statutes regulating procurement. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Fleet Maintenance Parks & Recreation FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue x Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $396,041.00 $0.00 $396,041.00 Encumbered / Expended Amount $117,795.72 $0.00 $117,795.72 This item $125,406.00 $0.00 $125,406.00 BALANCE $152,839.28 $0.00 $152,839.28 Fund(s): Parks & Recreation Fund Comments: Funding for the purchase of the 4,000 gallon water truck is approved in the FY 2015- 2016 budget. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Price Sheet CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION BUYER: ROBERTA ORTIZ ITEM 1 DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT PRICE SHEET 4,000 GALLON WATER TRUCK H -GAC CONTRACT: HT06-14 RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF TEXAS, L.P. HOUSTON, TEXAS UNIT PRICE Peterbilt 348 Water Truck with 4,000 Gallon Tank 1 EA $125,406.00 Total Price EXTENDED PRICE $125,406.00 $125,406.00 Run: 05/12/2016 at 5:00 AM CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS APPROPRIATION EXPENDITURE REPORT BY ORGANIZATION FOR THE 8 MONTHS ENDED May 31, 2016 ORGANIZATION: 12940 - Beach Operations Fund: 1020 - General Fd Annual Commitments & Unencumbered % of Budget Acct# Account Description Original Budget Amended Budget Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Expended 548010 Fleet Repair Costs Alloc 548030 Building Main Chgs Alloc 548060 MIS Alloc 548120 Self Insurance Alloc 103,668.00 10,908.00 19, 548.00 35,256.00 103,668.00 10,908.00 19, 548.00 35,256.00 69,112.00 7.272.00 13,032.00 23.504.00 Total Allocations 169,380.00 550020 Vehicles & Machinery 550040 Other Equipment 169, 380.00 112, 920.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34, 556.00 3,636.00 6,516.00 11, 752.00 56,460.00 66.67 66.67 66.67 66.67 66.67 294,000.00 0.00 396,041.00 23,130.00 0.00 23.130.00 243,201.72 0.00 152,839.28 0.00 Total Capital 294,000.00 TOTAL 419,171.00 23,130.00 243, 201.72 152, 8 39.28 61.41 100.00 63.54 1,751,488.55 1,859,970.78 755,715.83 500,863.22 603,391.73 67.56 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of May 31, 2016 DATE: May 24, 2016 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Dan Grimsbo, Interim Director of Water Utilities DanG(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-1718 Annette Rodriguez, Director of Public Health annetter(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-7205 Maria Pedraza, Procurement Manager MariaPe(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-3176 Laboratory Testing Reagent Colilert Supply Agreement CAPTION: Resolution finding that competitive bids are not required for a procurement from IDEXX Distribution, Inc., Westbrook, Maine, for the laboratory testing reagent Colilert, and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to enter into a supply agreement for a not to exceed amount of $135,304.00, of which $45,101.33 is required for the remainder of FY 2015-2016. Funds have been budgeted by the Water Department and Health Department in FY 2015-2016. The term of the agreement shall be for one year with an option to extend for up to two additional one year terms, subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or designee. PURPOSE: Colilert is used by the Water and Health Departments to test water for bacteria. Colilert is the only testing reagent approved by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality for this type of testing. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: IDEXX Distribution, Inc., is the sole manufacturer and sole source supplier in the United States water testing market. This testing is required by the Environmental Protection Agency and administered by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. The Water Department tests the water for the City of Corpus Christi. The Health Department is a regional testing lab and tests the water for various cities in the surrounding area. The Health Department charges for the service and the fees are reimbursed to the City. ALTERNATIVES: Not applicable. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The proposed purchase conforms to City purchasing policies and procedures. IDEXX Distribution, Inc., is the sole source procurement according to Local Government code 252.022(a)(7)(A). EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Water Department, Health Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: x Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fund(s): Water Fund, Nueces County Health District Fund Comments: The $45,101.33 financial impact shown above represents four months of expenditures that will be encumbered through the end of this fiscal year. The remaining $90,202.67 for the last eight months of the contract will be requested for next fiscal year during the normal budget process. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Price sheet Supply Agreement Project to Date Fiscal Year: 2015- Expenditures Current 2016 (CIP only) Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $239,189.03 $90,202.67 $329,391.70 Encumbered / Expended Amount $171,907.76 $0 $171,907.76 This item $45,101.33 $90,202.67 $135,304.00 BALANCE $22,179.94 $0 $22,179.94 Fund(s): Water Fund, Nueces County Health District Fund Comments: The $45,101.33 financial impact shown above represents four months of expenditures that will be encumbered through the end of this fiscal year. The remaining $90,202.67 for the last eight months of the contract will be requested for next fiscal year during the normal budget process. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Price sheet Supply Agreement Resolution finding that competitive bids are not required for a procurement from IDEXX Distribution, Inc., Westbrook, Maine, for the laboratory testing reagent Colilert, and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to enter into a supply agreement for a not to exceed amount of $135,304.00, of which $45,101.33 is required for the remainder of FY 2015-2016. Funds have been budgeted by the Water Department and Health Department in FY 2015-2016. The term of the agreement shall be for one year with an option to extend for up to two additional one year terms, subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or designee. WHEREAS, IDEXX Distribution, Inc., is the sole manufacturer and sole source supplier in the US water testing market; WHEREAS, State law provides that such procurements, as outlined above, are subject to statutory procurement requirements, including competitive bids, unless an exception applies; WHEREAS, there are two applicable statutory exceptions for this procurement, as follows: Local Government Code, Sections 252.022(a)(7)(A), as items available from only one source due to patents, copyrights, secret processes, or natural monopolies. Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas: Section 1. The City Council specifically finds that the foregoing statements included in the preamble of this resolution are true and correct and adopts such findings for all intents and purposes related to the authorization of this procurement. Section 2. The City Manager, or his designee, is authorized to enter into a supply agreement for a not to exceed amount of $135,305.00 with IDEXX Distribution, Inc. ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta, City Secretary Nelda Martinez, Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas day of , 20 The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Rudy Garza Michael T. Hunter Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Lucy Rubio Brian Rosas Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughn CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION COLILERT BUYER: DOMINGO VALDEZ PRICE SHEET ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QTY. UNIT IDEXX DISTRIBUTION, INC. WESTBROOK, MAINE UNIT TOTAL PRICE PRICE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Colilert, P/N WP2001, 200 packs/case Colilert 18, P/N WP2001-18, 200 packs/case Colilert Vessels, P/N WV120SBST-200, 200 each/case Enterolert, P/N WENT200, 200 packs/case Quanti-Tray, P/N WQT100, 100 trays/case Quanti-Tray/2000, P/N WQT2K, 100 trays/case Colilert Comparator, P/N WP104, 1 bottle/box Colilert Vessels, 290m1, P/N WV290SBST-100 15 60 200 60 15 100 4 200 case case case case case case box case $515 $515 $70 $721 $105 $158 $11 $110 TOTAL: $7,725 $30,900 $14,000 $43,260 $1,575 $15,800 $44 $22,000 $135,304 SUPPLY AGREEMENT NO. 630 THIS CoFlert Supply Agreement (this "Agreement") is entered into by and between 1DEXX Distribution, Inc. (the "Supplier"), Westbrook, Maine and the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation (the "City") effective for all purposes upon execution by the City Manager or designee ("City Manager"). WHEREAS, Supplier is the sole manufacturer and sole source supplier in the US water testing market to provide Colilert; NOW, THEREFORE, Supplier and City enter into this Agreement and agree as follows: 1. Scope. Supplier will deliver Colilert in accordance with the Price Sheet as shown in Attachment 1. 2. Term. This Agreement is for 12 months, commencing on _05/23/2016 and continuing through 05/22/2017. The Agreement includes an option to extend the term for up to two additional Twelve month periods provided the parties do so prior to expiration of the original Agreement and subject to the written approval of the Supplier and the City Manager. 3. Compensation and Payment. The total value of this Agreement is not to exceed $ 135,304.00 subject to extensions and changes. Payment will be made for goods delivered and accepted by the City within 30 days of acceptance and receipt of an acceptable invoice. All pricing must be in accordance with the Price Sheet as shown in Attachment 1. 4, Quality or Quantity Adjustments. Any quantities indicated on the Price Sheet are estimates only and do not obligate the City to order or accept more than the City's actual requirements during the Agreement, nor do the estimates limit the City to ordering less than its actual needs during the Agreement, subject to availability of appropriated funds. Substitutions or deviations from product requirements or specifications are prohibited without prior written approval of the Contract Administrator Page 1 of 7 5. Release Order. The City will exercise its right to specify time, place and quantity of products to be delivered in the following manner: Any City department or division may send to Supplier a purchase release order. The purchase release order will refer to this Agreement, products will remain with the Supplier until such time as they are delivered and accepted by the City. 6. Inspection and Acceptance. Any Colilert reagent that are delivered but not accepted must be corrected or replaced immediately at no charge to the City or a replacement may be bought on the open market and any costs incurred including additional costs over the item's bid price must be paid by the Contractor within 30 days of receipt of City's invoice. 7. Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this Agreement including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for payment. All of the Supplier's notices or communications regarding this Agreement must be directed to the Contract Administrator or designee, as follows: Marisa Juarez Utilities - Water Lab 13101 Leopard St. Phone: (361) 826-1201 Email: MarisaJC�cctexas.com 8. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement or any right or interest herein by the Supplier is effective unless the City Manager first gives its written consent to such assignment. The performance of this Agreement by the Supplier is of the essence of this Agreement and the City's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City on any ground whatsoever. 9. Fiscal Year. All parties recognize that the continuation of any contract after the dose of any fiscal year of the City (the City's fiscal year ends on September 30th), is subject to appropriations and budget approval providing for such contract item as an expenditure in said budget. The City does not represent that said budget item will be actually adopted as that determination is within the sole discretion of the City Council at the Time of adoption of each budget. Page2of7 10.Waiver. No waiver of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement, or the Supplier's bid offer waives any subsequent breach of the same. 11.Governing Law. This Agreement is subject to all federal, State, and local laws, rules, and regulations. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of Texas, and such form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district, county or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas. 12.Amendments. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by the parties. Such amendment will be in the form of a change order. Change orders may be used to modify quantities as deemed necessary by the City. 13.Termination. The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Supplier's failure to perform the work specified in this Agreement. Failure to keep any required insurance policies in force for the entire term of this Agreement is grounds for termination. The Contract Administrator must give the Supplier 10 work days written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. It the Supplier has not cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. Alternatively, the City may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 30 days' written notice to the Supplier. However, the City may terminate this Agreement on 24 hours written notice to the Supplier for failure to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes as set out herein. 14.Taxes. The Supplier covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA faxes, unemployment taxes and all other related taxes. Upon request, the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of these taxes within 15 days of such request. Failure to pay or provide proof of payment is grounds for the City Manager to immediately terminate this Agreement. 15.Certificate of Interested Parties. Supplier agrees to comply with Texas Government Code Section 2252.908 and complete Form 1295 "Certificate of Interested Parties" as part of this Agreement. Page 3 of 7 16. Notice. Notice may be given by fax, email, hand delivery or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is received on the day faxed or hand - delivered and on the third day after deposit if sent certified mail. Notice must be sent as follows: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi - Utilities Attention: Marisa Juarez TITLE: Lab Manager ADDRESS: 13101 Leopard St., Corpus Christi, TX 78410 FAX: (361) 242-9131 EMAIL: MarisaJ@cctexas.com IF TO SUPPLIER IDEXX Distribution Inc. Attention: Chin -Ming Chen TITLE: General Manager and Sr. Director ADDRESS: One Idexx Dr., Westbrook, ME 04092 FAX: (207) 556-4630 EMAIL: water@idexx.com 17. Extension. This Agreement is subject to extension at the sole discretion of the City. 18.Severability. Each provision of the Agreement is considered to be severable and, if, for any reason, any such provision or any part hereof is determined to be invalid and contrary to any existing or future applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of or affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, but this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part hereof had been omitted. 19. SUPPLIER AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS ("INDEMNITEES") FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF ANY NATURE ON ACCOUNT OF DEATH, PERSONAL INJURIES, PROPERTY LOSS OR DAMAGE OR ANY OTHER KIND OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS' Page 4 of 7 FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES WHICH ARISE OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS CONTRACT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS CONTRACT, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE INJURIES, DEATH OR DAMAGES ARE CAUSED OR ARE CLAIMED TO BE CAUSED BY THE CONCURRENT OR CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES, BUT NOT IF BY THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES UNMIXED WITH THE FAULT OF ANY OTHER PERSON OR GROUP. SUPPLIER MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, INVESTIGATE ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO INDEMNITEES AND PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ANY KIND ARISING FROM ANY SAID LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF SUPPLIER UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. 20. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, either oral or written, between the parties. 21. Order of Precedence. In the event of conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement and its exhibits or attachments, such conflicts or inconsistencies will be resolved by reference to the documents in the following order of priority: this Agreement and its Attachments, the bid solicitation documents including Addenda, the Bid Response. Page 5 of 7 SUPPLIER Signature:+P, (7j -fa. Printed Name: CAW- VAVVI Title: QINM+r qi,01 Date: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Signature: Printed Name: Title: Date: Attachments: Attachment 1: Price Sheet Page 6 of 7 ATTACHMENT 1: PRICE SHEET CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION COLILERT BUYER: DOMINGO VALDEZ PRICE SHEET ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QTY. UNIT IDEXX DISTRIBUTION, INC. WESTBROOK, MAINE UNIT TOTAL PRICE PRICE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Coiilert, P/N WP2001, 200 packs/case Coiilert 18, P/N WP200I-18, 200 packs/case Coiilert Vessels, P/N WV120SBST-200, 200 each/case Enterolert, P/N WENT200, 200 packs/case Quanti-Tray, P/N WQT100, 100 trays/case Quanti-Tray/2000, P/N WQT2K, 100 trays/case Coiilert Comparator, P/N WP104, 1 bottle/box Coiilert Vessels, 290m1, P/N WV290SBST-100 Page 7 of 7 15 case $515 $7,725 60 case $515 $30,900 200 case $70 $14,000 60 case $721 $43,260 15 case $105 $1,575 100 case $158 $15,800 4 box $11 $44 200 case $110 $22,000 TOTAL: $135,304 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. 1DEXX Distribution, Inc. Westbrook, ME United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-44852 Date Filed: 04/25/2016 Date Acknowledged: 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods or other property to be provided under the contract. 630 Water Testing Supplies 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. ignature of authorized agent of contracting b/isiness entity AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE )} '�} Swornlto and subscribed before me, by the said CJikkit... 1 �/{ ►LQ '�-�"t'k , this the c7C 1� day of 20 k+Le to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. CYNTHIA M. COOMBS Notary Public, Maine My Commission Expires December 16, 2019 Sign•ture of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.312 AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting of May 24, 2016 DATE: May 9, 2016 TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager FROM: Dan Grimsbo, P.E., Interim Director, Water Utilities DanG@cctexas.com (361) 826-1718 Wastewater Management Plan STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name 1. Mark Van Vleck 2. Dan Grimsbo 3. OUTSIDE PRESENTER(S): Title/Position Department ACM Executive Offices Interim Director Water Utilities Name Title/Position Organization 1. 2. 3. BACKGROUND: This presentation will update the Council on the current status of this item. It is for informational purposes only and no action is required. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Presentation —Wastewater Management Plan Wastewater Management Plan Status Report - May 2016 Mark Van Vleck Objectives • Update Council on work to date on WWTP Management Plan • Provide overview of material for Open House #2 • Identify work still to do and timing for next steps • Address Questions Wastewater Management Plan Approach Determine what the City can afford to spend Determine best recapitalization / consolidation plan Identify risk factors associated with implementation Confirm what drives capital and O&M costs Develop plan that provides flexibility to overall implementation Identify best project delivery approach for each package Confirm costs and user rates for status quo alternative Develop a CIP and list of contracting packages Develop a cash flow plan and schedule Assessment Results to Date • All 6 Treatment Plants Require Work • Capital Cost for Treatment Plant Repair and Rehab is estimated at approx. $220M • Staffing Levels at the Plants are within benchmark ranges • Energy and Chemical Costs are well above benchmark levels • Oso and Greenwood require expansion to meet future flows • Treatment for 60 MGD capacity is required for next 30 years including Planned Development to south of Oso Creek Option Development • Options were developed to meet these priorities: 1. Meeting regulatory compliance 2. Minimize wastewater user rates 3. Reduce long term O&M and capital costs 4. Provide drought resistant water to industry 5. Meet needs for planned development • All Options will: — Consolidate 4 plants (Oso, Allison, Greenwood, Laguna Madre) — Keep New Broadway and Whitecap in operation Options Under Consideration Category Description Sub -options 1 - Status Quo Keep all six plants. Continue with current operations and planned maintenance. • Not applicable 2 - Consolidate at Existing Plant sites 3 - Consolidate at New Plant site 4- Combination of New and Existing Keep Broadway & Whitecap. • Allison + Laguna Madre Consolidate remainder at two of the • Allison + Oso existing plant sites. Keep Broadway & Whitecap. Consolidate remainder at one new plant site. Keep Broadway & Whitecap. Consolidate remainder at two sites with at least one new site plus an existing site. • North site • Southwest site • Southeast site • North + Laguna Madre • Southwest + Laguna Madre • North + Southeast • North + Oso Sample of a One Site Option (3C: Southeast) Allison (5.0 MGD) Legend 0 New WWTP Decommission WWTP Repair and Maintain WWTP Expand and Upgrade WWTP Wastewater Pipeline Wiles Sample of a Two Site Option (4D: North & Oso Allison (5.0 MGD) �2 Legend 0 New WWTP Decommission WWTP Repair and Maintain WWTP Expand and Upgrade WWTP Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline 2.5 Wiles Questions? Backup Slides Options Being Considered Options were developed to meet these priorities: 1. Meeting regulatory compliance 2. Minimize wastewater user rates 3. Reduce long term Operating and Maintenance (O&M) and capital costs 4. Provide drought resistant water to industry 5. Meet needs for planned development ato Stantec Wastewater Servicing Options Category Description Sub -options 1 - Status Quo 2 - Consolidate at Existing Plant sites 3 - Consolidate at New Plant site 4- Combination of New and Existing Keep all six plants. Continue with current operations and planned maintenance. Keep Broadway & Whitecap. Consolidate remainder at two of the existing plant sites. Keep Broadway & Whitecap. Consolidate remainder at one new plant site. Keep Broadway & Whitecap. Consolidate remainder at two sites with at least one new site plus an existing site. • Not applicable • Allison + Laguna Madre • Allison + Oso • North site • Southwest site • Southeast site • North + Laguna Madre • Southwest + Laguna Madre • North + Southeast • North + Oso Project Goal The goal of the project is to report on the current state of the system, plan for future wastewater needs, and optimize costs and user rates. Stantec Option 1: Status Qu Allison 5.0 MGD) N Legend Expand and Upgrade Repair and Maintain Reuse Pipeline 2.5 5 Miles Greenwood (8.0 MGD) Whitecap (2.5 MGO) Option 1: DESCRIPTION Collection System Rehabilitation Repair and Rehabilitation of existing 6 treatments plants Upgrade Oso, Allison and Greenwood to Advanced Treatment Expand Capacity at Oso (8 MGD) and Greenwood (2 MGD) Provide Reuse Water from Greenwood and Allison to Industry Provide Capacity for Planned Development Capital cost for 30 Year plan estimated as $900M to $1,050M Evaluation of Option 1: Statu ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES • Minimal impact on collection system • Continue inefficiencies of operating multiple plant sites • Maintains base flows in existing receiving waters • Need a new plant for servicing of development south of Oso Creek • Allows immediate start on necessary rehabilitation • Requires upgrades at Oso while operating near full capacity • Lowest overall Capital cost • Continues with site flooding issues at Greenwood • Expansion at Oso may not be possible due to prior agreements Option 2A: Allison & Laauna Madre Allison (5.0 MGD) N roadway (8.0 MGD) Legend Decommission Repair and Maintain Expand and Upgrade Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline 2.5 5 10 Mil Greenwoo ! (8.0 MGD) Corpus Christi Bay Oso (16.2 MGD) Laguna Madre (3.0 MGD) Whitecap (2.5 MGD) 1 Option 2,A' Allison & Laauna IV DESCRIPTION Collection System Rehabilitation Expand and Upgrade Allison (35 MGD) and Laguna Madre (25 MGD) Decommission Oso and pump flow to Laguna Madre Decommission Greenwood and pump flow to Allison Repair and Rehabilitation of Broadway and Whitecap Provide Reuse Water from Allison to Industry Provide Capacity for Planned Development Capital cost for 30 Year plan estimated as $1,050M to $1,300M Option 2B: Allison 64 us* N Allison (5.0 MGD) roadway (8.0 MGD) Legend Decommission Repair and Maintain Expand and Upgrade Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline 2.5 5 10 Miles Greenwoo ! (8.0 MGD) Corpus Christi Bay Oso 6.2 MGD) Laguna Madre (3.0 MGD) Whitecap (2.5 MGD) Option DESCRIPTION Collection System Rehabilitation Expand and Upgrade Allison (35 MGD) and Oso (25 MGD) Decommission Laguna Madre and pump flow to Oso Decommission Greenwood and pump flow to Allison Repair and Rehabilitation of Broadway and Whitecap Provide Reuse Water from Allison to Industry Provide Capacity for Planned Development Capital cost for 30 Year plan estimated as $1,000M to $1,250M Disadvantages Evaluation of Category 2 Options (Consolidate to two existing sites) Advantages 2A • Consolidates over 85% of the City flow in two plants • No land required for new plant with potential new neighbor issues • Close to industry for reuse • Allows immediate start on rehabilitation and repairs • Continue inefficiencies of operating multiple plant sites • More stringent future effluent requirements at Allison 2B • Consolidates over 85% of the City flow in two plants • No land required for new plant with potential new neighbor issues • Close to industry for reuse • Allows immediate start on rehabilitation and repairs • Maintain base flow into Oso Bay • Continue inefficiencies of operating multiple plant sites • Requires upgrades at Oso while operating near full capacity • More stringent future effluent requirements at Allison and Oso • Expansion at Oso may not be possible due to prior agreements Option 3A: North Si N roadway 1 (8.0 MGD) Legend New WWTP Decommission WWTP Repair and Maintain WWTP Expand and Upgrade WWTP Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline 0 2.5 Miles Greenwoo (8.0 MGD) Corpus Christi Bay OSO (16.2 MGD) Laguna Madre (3.0 MGD) Whitecap (2.5 MGD) Ilk Option 3A' North Site DESCRIPTION Collection System Rehabilitation Construct New Plant (60 MGD) generally between 137 and CC Airport Decommission Allison and pump flow to New Plant Decommission Laguna Madre and Oso, pump flow to Greenwood Decommission Greenwood and pump flow to New Plant Repair and Rehabilitation of Broadway and Whitecap Provide Reuse Water from New Plant to Industry Provide Capacity for Planned Development Capital cost for 30 Year plan estimated as $1,100M to $1,350M Option 3B: Southwest Sit Allison 5.0 MGD) N roadway (8.0 MGD) Legend New WWTP Decommission WWTP Repair and Maintain WWTP Expand and Upgrade WWTP Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline 2.5 5 Wiles Gr- nwo (8. MGD Corpus Christi Bay Oso (16.2 MGD) Laguna Madre (3.0 MGD) Whitecap (2.5 MGD) Option 3R' Southwest Site DESCRIPTION Collection System Rehabilitation Construct New Plant (60 MGD) south of Oso Creek near Crosstown Exp. Decommission Allison and pump flow to New Plant Decommission Laguna Madre and Oso, pump flow to New Plant Decommission Greenwood and pump flow to New Plant Repair and Rehabilitation of Broadway and Whitecap Provide Reuse Water from New Plant to Industry Provide Capacity for Planned Development Capital cost for 30 Year plan estimated as $1,150M to $1,400M O.tion 3C: Southeast Site r__ N roadway (8.0 MGD) Legend New WWTP Decommission WWTP Repair and Maintain WWTP Expand and Upgrade WWTP It Wastewater Pipeline Miles Green (8.0 MGD) Corpus Christi Bay Oso (10.2 -MGD) Oso Laguna Madre (3.0 MGD) ♦�� Whitecap (2.5 MGD) Option 3C! Southeast Site DESCRIPTION Collection System Rehabilitation Construct New Plant (60 MGD) south of Yorktown Rd near Oso Bay Decommission Allison and pump flow to Greenwood Decommission Laguna Madre and Oso, pump flow to New Plant Decommission Greenwood and pump flow to New Plant Repair and Rehabilitation of Broadway and Whitecap No Reuse Water proposed to Industry (not cost effective) Provide Capacity for Planned Development Capital cost for 30 Year plan estimated as $1,100M to $1,300M Evaluation of Category 3 Options (Consolidate to one new site) Advantages Disadvantages 3A • Consolidates over 85% of the City flow in one new plant • Compatible surrounding land use for new plant site • Least stringent future effluent requirements • Close to industry for reuse 3B • Consolidates over 85% of the City flow in one new plant • Close to Greenwood for pumping of flow • Maintains base flow in Oso Creek 3C • Consolidates over 85% of the City flow in one new plant • Close to Oso and Laguna Madre for pumping of flow • Longest distance from Oso and Laguna Madre • Longer distance for pumping reuse flow to industry • Most stringent future effluent requirements • Surrounding land use is residential • Longest distance from Allison • No provision for reuse to Industry • More stringent future effluent requirements • Surrounding land use is residential Option 4A: North & Laauna Madre Allison .4MGD) N roadway 1 (8.0 MGD) Legend New WWTP Decommission WWTP Repair and Maintain WWTP Expand and Upgrade WWTP Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline 0 2.5 5 ,o Miles Greenwoo (8.0 MGD) Corpus Christi Bay Oso (16.2 MGD) Whitecap (2.5 MGD) Laguna Madre (3.0 MGD) Ilk Option 4A! North & Laauna Maar DESCRIPTION Collection System Rehabilitation Construct North New Plant (35 MGD) between 137 and CC Airport Expand and Upgrade Laguna Madre (25 MGD) Decommission Oso and pump flow to Laguna Madre Decommission Allison and Greenwood, pump flow to North New Plant Repair and Rehabilitation of Broadway and Whitecap Provide Reuse Water from North New Plant to Industry Provide Capacity for Planned Development Capital cost for 30 Year plan estimated as $1,000M to $1,250M Option 4B: Southwest & Laguna Madre Allison .0 MOD) N w roadway (8.0 MGD) Legend New WWTP Decommission WWTP Repair and Maintain WWTP Expand and Upgrade WWTP Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline 2.5 5 Wiles Gr (0 Corpus Christi Bay Oso 16.2 MGD) Laguna Madre (3.0 MGD) Whitecap (2.s MGD) Option 41R• Southwest & Laguna 1v DESCRIPTION Collection System Rehabilitation Construct SW New Plant (35 MGD) south of Oso Creek near Crosstown Expand and Upgrade Laguna Madre (25 MGD) Decommission Oso and pump flow to Laguna Madre Decommission Allison and Greenwood, pump flow to SW New Plant Repair and Rehabilitation of Broadway and Whitecap Provide Reuse Water from SW New Plant to Industry Provide Capacity for Planned Development Capital cost for 30 Year plan estimated as $1,050M to $1,300M Option 4C: North & South Allison .0_MGD) N roadway 1 (8.0 MGD) Corpus Christi Bay Legend New WWTP Decommission WWTP Repair and Maintain WWTP Expand and Upgrade WWTP Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline 0 2.5 5 0 Miles Greenviioo (8.0 MGD) Laguna Madre (3.0 MGD) A. Option 4C! North & Southeast DESCRIPTION Collection System Rehabilitation Construct North New Plant (15 MGD) between 137 and CC Airport Construct SE New Plant (45 MGD) south of Yorktown Rd near Oso Bay Decommission Oso and Laguna Madre, pump flow to SE New Plant Decommission Allison and Greenwood, pump flow to North New Plant Repair and Rehabilitation of Broadway and Whitecap Provide Reuse Water from North New Plant to Industry Provide Capacity for Planned Development Capital cost for 30 Year plan estimated as $1,100M to $1,300M Option 4D: North & Ost Allison .0_MGD) N roadway 1 (8.0 MGD) Corpus Christi Bay Legend New WWTP Decommission WWTP Repair and Maintain WWTP Expand and Upgrade WWTP Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline 0 2.5 5 10 Miles Greenwoo (8.0 MGD) OSO (16.2 MGD) Whitecap (2.5 MGD) Option 4D: North & Oso DESCRIPTION Collection System Rehabilitation Construct New Plant (35 MGD) generally between 137 and CC Airport Expand and Upgrade Oso (25 MGD) Decommission Laguna Madre and pump flow to Oso Decommission Allison and Greenwood, pump flow to New Plant Repair and Rehabilitation of Broadway and Whitecap Provide Reuse Water from North New Plant to Industry Provide Capacity for Planned Development Capital cost for 30 Year plan estimated as $1,000M to $1,200M Evaluation of Category 4 Options (ConsolirlRte fn two sites - rpwhaxisting) Advantages 111.1. Disadvantages IMF 4A • Consolidates over 85% of the City flow into two large plants • Compatible surrounding land use for new plant site • Less stringent future effluent requirements • Close to industry for reuse • Longer distance for pumping of flows from development south of Oso Creek • High upfront cost for two new facilities 4B • Consolidates over 85% of the City flow into two large plants • SW Plant close to development areas south of Oso Creek • Maintains base flow in Oso Creek • Longer distance for pumping reuse flow to industry • Surrounding land use at SW Plant is residential • More stringent future effluent requirements at SW Plant Evaluation of Category 4 Options Cont. (Consolidate to two sites - new/existing) Advantages Disadvantages 4C • Consolidates over 85% of the City flow into two large plants • SE Plant close to development areas south of Oso Creek • Maintains base flow in Oso Bay 4D • Consolidates over 85% of the City flow into two large plants • Maintains base flow in Oso Bay • Lowest Capital cost of consolidation options • Surrounding land use at SE Plant is residential • Requires two new sites • High upfront cost for two new facilities • More stringent future effluent requirements at SE Plant • Requires upgrades at Oso while operating near full capacity • More stringent future effluent requirements at Oso • Expansion at Oso may not be possible due to prior agreements