Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet City Council - 07/12/2016 Cornus Christi 1201 Leopard Street - r Corpus Christi,TX 78401 i cctexas.com Meeting Agenda - Final City Council Tuesday,July 12,2016 11:30 AM Council Chambers Public Notice --THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE PROHIBITED IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. Members of the audience will be provided an opportunity to address the Council at approximately 12:00 p.m., or the end of the Council Meeting, whichever is earlier. Please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. Your presentation will be limited to three minutes. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Si Usted desea dirigirse al Concilio y cree que su ingles es limitado, habra un interprete ingles-espanol en todas las juntas del Concilio para ayudarle. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or services are requested to contact the City Secretary's office(at 361-826-3105) at least 48 hours in advance so that appropriate arrangements can be made. A. Mayor Nelda Martinez to call the meeting to order. B. Invocation to be given by Pastor Rod Young, Church of Hope. C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States to be led by Steve Viera, Interim Director of Human Resources and Benefits. D. City Secretary Rebecca Huerta to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. E. Proclamations /Commendations 1. 16-0757 Proclamation declaring July 11-15, 2016, "National Disability Voter Registration Week". Proclamation declaring July 16, 2016, "Mandela Day in Corpus Christi". Recognition of Mayor's July 4th Big Bang Celebration Essay Contest Winner, Ms. Yuna Jung. Corpus Christi Page 1 Printed on 7/8/2016 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final July 12,2016 F. PUBLIC COMMENT FROM THE AUDIENCE ON MATTERS NOT SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA WILL BE HEARD AT APPROXIMATELY 12:00 P.M. PLEASE LIMIT PRESENTATIONS TO THREE MINUTES. A recording is made of the meeting; therefore, please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. If you choose to speak during this public comment period regarding an item on the agenda, you may do so. You will not be allowed to speak again, however, when the Council is considering the item. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT PROHIBITS THE CITY COUNCIL FROM RESPONDING AND DISCUSSING YOUR COMMENTS AT LENGTH. THE LAW ONLY AUTHORIZES THEM TO DO THE FOLLOWING: 1. MAKE A STATEMENT OF FACTUAL INFORMATION. 2. RECITE AN EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO THE INQUIRY. 3. ADVISE THE CITIZEN THAT THIS SUBJECT WILL BE PLACED ON AN AGENDA AT A LATER DATE. PER CITY COUNCIL POLICY, NO COUNCIL MEMBER, STAFF PERSON, OR MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE SHALL BERATE, EMBARRASS, ACCUSE, OR SHOW ANY PERSONAL DISRESPECT FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE STAFF, COUNCIL MEMBERS, OR THE PUBLIC AT ANY COUNCIL MEETING. THIS POLICY IS NOT MEANT TO RESTRAIN A CITIZEN'S FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. G. CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS / UPDATE ON CITY OPERATIONS: a. OTHER H. MINUTES: 2. 16-0760 Regular Meeting of June 21, 2016 I. BOARD &COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: 3. 16-0758 Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation (Type A) Planning Commission J. EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION: For administrative convenience, certain of the agenda items are listed as motions, resolutions, or ordinances. If deemed appropriate, the City Council will use a different method of adoption from the one listed;may finally pass an ordinance by adopting it as an emergency measure rather than a two reading ordinance;or may modify the action specified. A motion to reconsider may be made at this meeting of a vote at the last regular, or a subsequent special meeting;such agendas are incorporated herein for reconsideration and action on any reconsidered item. Corpus Christi Page 2 Printed on 7/8/2016 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final July 12,2016 K. CONSENT AGENDA: (ITEMS 4 -5) NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: The following items are consent motions, resolutions, and ordinances of a routine or administrative nature. The Council has been furnished with background and support material on each item, and/or it has been discussed at a previous meeting. All items will be acted upon by one vote without being discussed separately unless requested by a Council Member or a citizen, in which event the item or items will immediately be withdrawn for individual consideration in its normal sequence after the items not requiring separate discussion have been acted upon. The remaining items will be adopted by one vote. 4. 16-0630 Second Reading Ordinance -CenturyLink Communications, LLC renewal of Conduit Use Agreement for Telecommunications (1st Reading 6/21/16) Ordinance authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a ten-year Conduit Use Agreement with CenturyLink Communications, L.L.C., to install and maintain telecommunications facilities within city conduit located in Ocean Drive right-of-way between Ennis Joslin Road and Sand Dollar Blvd. in consideration of$7,886.00 annual revenue payment, to be increased by 4% annually. Sponsors: Information Technology Services 5. 16-0690 Second Reading Ordinance -Amending lease agreement to add additional parking spaces for lesee of City parking lot located at Mann Street and Mesquite Street(1st Reading 6/21/16) Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an amendment to the lease agreement with the Results Companies for the City parking lot located at Mann Street and Mesquite Street to allow the lease of the entire City parking lot Sponsors: Business Liaison L. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (ITEMS 6 -8) PUBLIC NOTICE is given that the City Council may elect to go into executive session at any time during the meeting in order to discuss any matters listed on the agenda, when authorized by the provisions of the Open Meeting Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, and that the City Council specifically expects to go into executive session on the following matters. If the Council elects to go into executive session regarding an agenda item, the section or sections of the Open Meetings Act authorizing the executive session will be publicly announced by the presiding officer. The City Council may deliberate and take action in open session on any issue that may be discussed in executive session. The description of an item in "Executive Sessions" constitutes the written interpretation by the City Attorney of Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code and his determination that said item may be legally discussed in Closed Meeting in compliance with Chapter 551 the Texas Government Code. 6. 16-0741 Executive session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 for consultation with attorneys regarding collective bargaining matters, (including litigation) between the City of Corpus Christi and the Corpus Christi Firefighters Association. Corpus Christi Page 3 Printed on 7/8/2016 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final July 12,2016 7. 16-0625 Executive Session pursuant to Section Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to the removal of Harbor Bridge and pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.072 to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property if deliberation in an open meeting would have a detrimental effect on the position of the governmental body in negotiations with a third person, related to the removal of Harbor Bridge. 8. 16-0793 Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.074 (Personnel Matters) to discuss the appointment, employment, and duties of public officers or employees, including, but not limited to, the position of the City Manager. M. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (ITEMS 9 - 11) 9. 16-0734 Public Hearing and First Reading Ordinance - Rezoning property located at 2302 and 2314 Saratoga Boulevard Case No. 0616-04 Kitty Hawk Development, Ltd.: A change of zoning from the "CG-1" General Commercial District to the "IL" Light Industrial District. The property to be rezoned is described as being a 2.8 acre tract of land encompassing all of Lots 1 through 3, Block 10, Saratoga Place and a portion of Lots 4 through 9 and a portion of Lot 12, Block 10, Saratoga Place, located on the north side of Saratoga Boulevard (State Highway 357) and approximately 120 feet west of Ayers Street. Planninq Commission and Staff Recommendation (June 1, 2016): Denial of the change of zoning from the "CG-1" General Commercial District to the "IL" Light Industrial District and, in lieu thereof, approval of the "IC" Industrial Compatible District. Ordinance: Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC'), upon application by Kitty Hawk Development, Ltd. ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to a 2.8 acre tract of land encompassing all of Lots 1 through 3, Block 10, Saratoga Place and a portion of Lots 4 through 9 and a portion of Lot 12, Block 10, Saratoga Place, from the "CG-1" General Commercial District to the "IC" Industrial Compatible District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. Sponsors: Development Services 10. 16-0735 Public Hearing and First Reading Ordinance - Rezoning property located at 3945 Crosstown Expressway (State Highway 286) Corpus Christi Page 4 Printed on 7/8/2016 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final July 12,2016 Case No. 0616-02 Coastal King, Ltd.: A change of zoning from the "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG-2" General Commercial District. The property to be rezoned is described as Lot 4, Block 4, Roseland Place, located on the northwest corner of Horne Road and Crosstown Expressway (State Highway 286). Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (June 1, 2016): Approval of the change of zoning from the "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG-2" General Commercial District. Ordinance: Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), upon application by Coastal King, Ltd. ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to Lot 4, Block 4, Roseland Place, from the "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG-2" General Commercial District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. Sponsors: Development Services 11. 16-0736 Public Hearing and First Reading Ordinance - Rezoning property located at 1402 Agnes Street Case No. 0616-03 J.Z. Auto, LLC: A change of zoning from the "IL" Light Industrial District to the "Cl" Intensive Commercial District. The property to be rezoned is described as Lots 15 and 16, Block 3, Chamberlin's Subdivision, located on the northwest corner of Agnes Street and 12th Street. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (June 15, 2016): Denial of the rezoning from the "IL" Light Industrial District to the "Cl" Intensive Commercial District and, in lieu thereof, approval of the "CI/SP" Intensive Commercial District with a Special Permit subject to three conditions. Ordinance: Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), upon application by J.Z. Auto, LLC ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to Lots 15 and 16, Block 3, Chamberlin's Subdivision, from the "IL" Light Industrial District to the "CI/SP" Intensive Commercial District with a Special Permit; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. Sponsors: Development Services Corpus Christi Page 5 Printed on 7/8/2016 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final July 12,2016 N. REGULAR AGENDA: (ITEM 12) The following items are motions, resolutions and ordinances that will be considered and voted on individually. 12. 16-0639 Second Reading Ordinance regarding the City of Corpus Christi's proposed FY2016-2017 Consolidated Annual Action Plan (1st Reading 6/21/16) Ordinance to adopt the fiscal year (FY) 2016-2017 Consolidated Annual Action Plan (CAAP), for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and the HOME Investment Parterships (HOME) Programs; to authorize the City Manager or designee to submit the FY2016-2017 CAAP to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and to amend if required by HUD; to authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept and appropriate upon receipt the grants from HUD into the Grant Fund No. 1059 for the approved FY2016-2017 CAAP projects and further to execute funding agreements and all other documents necessary to implement the FY2016-2017 CAAP with organizations of approved projects. Sponsors: Housing and Community Development O. FIRST READING ORDINANCES: (ITEMS 13 - 17) 13. 16-0743 First Reading Ordinance -Accepting and appropriating Community Enrichment Funds for park improvements Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept and appropriate $650,025.34 in developer contributions, other donations and interest earnings in the 4720 Community Enrichment Fund for park improvements and other related projects as described on the attached and incorporated Exhibit A. Sponsors: Parks and Recreation Department 14. 16-0678 First Reading Ordinance -Authorizing City Manager or designee to apply for, accept, and appropriate funds for the Texas State Library Archives Commission (TSLAC) items Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute documents to apply for and accept grants and reimbursements from the Texas State Library and Archives Commission (TSLAC); and to appropriate funds from TSLAC in the No. 1068 Library Grant Fund for said City programs. Sponsors: Libraries 15. 16-0680 First Reading Ordinance -Authorizing City Manager or designee to Corpus Christi Page 6 Printed on 7/8/2016 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final July 12,2016 appropriate royaties from bequeathed oil, gas, and mineral interest funds to Library fund Ordinance authorizing City Manager or designee to appropriate royalties received from oil, gas, and mineral interests bequeathed to the Corpus Christi La Retama Central Library by William T. Neyland into the Library Grants fund No 1068. Sponsors: Libraries 16. 16-0767 First Reading Ordinance -Amending City Code Chapter 57 to include revisions for vehicles for hire Ordinance amending Chapter 57, Article II "TAXICABS" of the Corpus Christi Code; Amending Chapter 57, Article IIIA "LIMOUSINE AND SIGHTSEEING SERVICE" of the Corpus Christi Code; amending Sec. 57-284. - Transportation network company permit fee and Sec. 57-294. - Transportation network vehicles-Inspections of the Corpus Christi Code; providing an effective date, severance, penalty, and publication. Sponsors: Interim Assistant City Manager 17. 16-0750 First Reading Ordinance -Amending Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances to allow for Transportation Network Companies (TNC) to operate at Corpus Christi International Airport Ordinance amending Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances to establish provisions for transportation network companies and transportation network drivers to operate at the Corpus Christi International Airport; and providing for penalties, severance, publication, and an effective date. Sponsors: Aviation Department P. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: (ITEMS 18 - 30) The following items are for Council's informational purposes only. No action will be taken and no public comment will be solicited. 18. 16-0710 Resolution ratifying the submission of a grant application for the Man-Portable X-ray Units project Resolution ratifying the submission of a grant application in the amount of$82,985.59 to the Office of the Governor for the Man-Portable X-ray Units project; and authorizing the City Manager or the City Manager's designee to accept, reject, alter or terminate the grant. Sponsors: Fire Department 19. 16-0711 Resolution ratifying the submission of a grant application for SWAT Ballistic Protection Equipment Resolution ratifying the submission of a grant application in the amount Corpus Christi Page 7 Printed on 7/8/2016 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final July 12,2016 of$181,873.20 to the Office of the Governor for the SWAT Ballistic Protection Equipment project; and authorizing the City Manager or the City Manager's designee to accept, reject, alter or terminate the grant. Sponsors: Fire Department 20. 16-0570 Approving the lease of six trucks for the Utilities Department Motion approving the lease of six trucks from PV Rentals, for the amount of$65,880 based on a cooperative purchasing agreement with the Texas Local Government Purchasing Cooperative, dba BuyBoard, of which $16,470 is required for the remainder of FY 2015-2016. Funds have been budgeted by the Utilities Department. The remaining contract balance will be funded through FY2016-2017. The term of the contract will be for one year with no extensions. Sponsors: Water Utilities Department and Purchasing Division 21. 16-0623 Supply Agreement for Liquid Cationic Polymer for treatment of potable drinking water Motion approving a Supply Agreement with Polydyne Inc. of Riceboro, Georgia for water treatment chemicals in accordance with Bid Invitation No. 116, based on the lowest responsive, responsible bid for an estimated annual expenditure of$345,390.00 of which $57,565.00 is budgeted by the Water Department for the remainder of FY 2015-2016. The terms of the contract will be for one year with options to extend for up to two additional one year periods, subject to the approval of the Supplier and the City Manager or designee. Sponsors: Water Utilities Department and Purchasing Division 22. 16-0739 Change Order No. 2 for the City-Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Program Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute Change Order No. 2 with National Power Rodding Corporation of Chicago, Illinois in the amount of$596,194.57 for a total restated fee of $3,437,500.00 for the City-Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Program (Program). Sponsors: Engineering Services and Water Utilities Department 23. 16-0613 Purchase of 30 Cabinet Assemblies with Cobalt Controllers and 5 individual Cobalt Controllers Motion approving the purchase of 30 Cabinet Assemblies with Cobalt Controllers and 5 individual Cobalt Controllers from Paradigm Traffic Systems, Houston, Texas based on a cooperative purchasing agreement with Texas Local Government Purchasing Cooperative, dba Corpus Christi Page 8 Printed on 7/8/2016 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final July 12,2016 BuyBoard, for the amount of$338,200.00. The Street Department has set aside funds in FY 2015-16 for this procurement. Sponsors: Street Department and Purchasing Division 24. 16-0670 Resolution for executing the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) Notification for Additional Funding in 2016 Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) Resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute the "Notification for Additional Funding in 2016 (Street Maintenance Program)" in an amount of$2,814,839.00 for the Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority's fiscal year 2016 allocation to the City's Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) projects. Sponsors: Street Department 25. 16-0732 Construction contract for Greenwood Drive from Gollihar Road to Horne Road (Bond 2012, Proposition 1) Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with HAAS-Anderson Construction, LTD of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$3,789,579.60 for Greenwood Drive from Gollihar Road to Horne Road for the total base bid. (BOND 2012 Proposition 1) Sponsors: Engineering Services and Street Department 26. 16-0738 Engineering Design contracts for North Beach Area Road Improvements and Area Beautification and Pedestrian Improvements and Area Enhancements (Bond 2012 - Proposition 8) Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute Engineering Design Contracts with LJA Engineering, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$130,524.70 for the North Beach Area - Road Improvements and Area Beautification project and $121,358.39 for the North Beach Area - Pedestrian Improvements and Area Enhancements for engineering design services. (Bond 2012, Proposition 8) Sponsors: Engineering Services and Parks and Recreation Department 27. 16-0740 Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation Contracts Amendment No. 1 Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute Amendment No. 1 for nine Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation (CISA) contracts totaling $1,846,875 for a total not to exceed amount of $2,291,695 providing augmented Construction Inspection staff within Engineering Services Department. Sponsors: Engineering Services and Office of Public Works Corpus Christi Page 9 Printed on 7/8/2016 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final July 12,2016 28. 16-0755 Approving the purchase of Cisco SmartNet maintenance for the City's Network Infrastructure and Internet Equipment Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to approve the purchase of three years Cisco SmartNet maintenance with Great South Texas Corp dba Computer Solutions of San Antonio, Texas, DIR-TSO-2542, for a total expenditure of$485,731.11. Funds are available in the Information Technology Department FY2015-2016 budget. Sponsors: Information Technology Services 29. 16-0756 Approving the expenditure of Type A funds for the rehabilitation of La Armada II Motion to approve the action of the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation, authorizing the expenditure of$150,000 of funding to the Corpus Christi Housing Authority for the rehabilitation of La Armada II. Sponsors: Housing and Community Development 30. 16-0737 Resolution authorizing the emergency expenditure for HVAC repair at the American Bank Center Resolution authorizing the emergency expenditure of$70,000 for HVAC repair at the American Bank Center, which was approved by the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation on May 16, 2016. Sponsors: Business Liaison Q. BRIEFINGS: (ITEMS 31 - 32) Briefing information will be provided to the City Council during the Council meeting. Briefings are for Council information only. Council may give direction to the City Manager, but no other action will be taken and no public comment will be solicited. 31. 16-0761 Management Review of Engineering Services Sponsors: Office of Strategic Management 32. 16-0635 FY 2015 Audited Comprehensive Annual Financial Report(CAFR) Sponsors: Financial Services Department R. ADJOURNMENT Corpus Christi Page 10 Printed on 7/8/2016 CorCorpus Christi 1201 Leopard Street F' Corpus Christi,TX 78401 r& cctexas.com Meeting Minutes City Council Tuesday,June 21,2016 11:30 AM Council Chambers Public Notice - - THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE PROHIBITED IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. A. Mayor Nelda Martinez to call the meeting to order. Mayor Martinez called the meeting to order. B. Invocation to be given by Pastor Monica Martinez, Greater Faith Church. Pastor Monica Martinez gave the invocation. C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States to be led by Yvette Aguilar- Assistant City Attorney. Assistant City Attorney Yvette Aguilar led the Pledge of Allegiance. D. City Secretary Rebecca Huerta to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. City Secretary Rebecca Huerta called the roll and verified that a quorum of the City Council and the required Charter Officers were present to conduct the meeting. (Note: Council Member Scott arrived at 11:45 a.m.) Charter Officers: Acting City Manager Margie C. Rose, City Attorney Miles K. Risley, and City Secretary Rebecca Huerta. Present: 9- Mayor Nelda Marti nez,Council Member Rudy Garza,Council Member Michael Hunter,Council Member Chad Magill,Council Member Colleen Mclntyre,Council Member Lucy Rubio,Council Member Brian Rosas,Council Member Mark Scott, and Council Member Carolyn Vaughn E. Proclamations /Commendations 1. Proclamation declaring June 21, 2016, "American Airlines 35th Anniversary Celebration of Service in Corpus Christi". Proclamation declaring June 26, 2016, "Ms. Coastal Bend Senior Pageant Day". Proclamation declaring June 30 - July 4, 2016, "39th Annual Mayor's July 4th Big Bang Celebration". Corpus Christi Page 1 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes June 21,2016 Proclamation declaring July 2016, "Parks and Recreation Month". Swearing-in Ceremony for Newly Appointed Board, Commission and Committee Members. Mayor Martinez presented the proclamations and conducted the swearing-in ceremony for newly appointed board, commission and committee members. F. PUBLIC COMMENT FROM THE AUDIENCE ON MATTERS NOT SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA WILL BE HEARD AT APPROXIMATELY 12:00 P.M. PLEASE LIMIT PRESENTATIONS TO THREE MINUTES. A recording is made of the meeting; therefore, please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. If you choose to speak during this public comment period regarding an item on the agenda, you may do so. You will not be allowed to speak again, however, when the Council is considering the item. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Mayor Martinez referred to comments from the public. Gloria Scott,4422 S. Alameda,spoke on behalf of the Corpus Christi Juneteenth Coalition and thanked the City Council for their participation in this year's "10 Days of Celebration of Emancipation" held June 9-19,2016 by presenting a key to the City and issuing a proclamation.Alan Wilson,445 Delaine, reported on the following three resolutions approved by the Corpus Christi Chamber of Commerce: 1)support for the 1/8 cent sales tax with the following positions: minimum of 50% of the total funds for economic development; up to$500,000 to housing programs;the balance of funds to arterial/collector streets; the continuance of the sales tax for 20 years; maintaining a review/recommendation panel,supports a Type B structure and appropriate protection mechanisms to ensure funds for economic development are maintained; 2)support of city bond election 2016 and supports a bond election every two years with a focus on deferred capital projects; and 3)encourages the City Council to develop a comprehensive financial plan for city streets, arterial/collector, residential, both capital and maintenance,to include a Type B sales tax, assessment revenue, existing general fund revenue, including enhanced funding and potential ad valorem tax increases.John Kelley, 3621 Austin, spoke regarding annexation of Chapman Ranch to prevent windfarm development and infrastructure issues. Barbara Brinkman,4802 Marie, requested consideration for additional budget funding for Animal Care Services and addressed the need for another veterinarian and supplies for the clinic. Chris Phelan, 1321 Ayers,spoke regarding the utility bill insert related to the 2015 annual drinking water quality report; a dead link reported for the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality's website on the insert; and radioactive material in drinking water. Carrie Robertson Meyer,4401 Gulfbreeze Boulevard,spoke regarding the design of the new Harbor Bridge and expressed concerns with the plans related to the Beach Avenue intersection;ADA, bike and pedestrian access; and solutions to current drainage problems. Vincent Perales,4602 Newbury Lane and a member of Nueces County Youth Against Tobacco requested consideration to amend the City's Code of Ordinances, Smoking in Public Places, to include all products that meet the definition of tobacco products, including: electronic cigarettes and pipes,vaporizers, hookahs, and all other electronic devices. Corbin Boomer Matthews, 3318 Casa Rosa Drive,spoke in favor of the Harbor Bridge being lit in rainbow colors and thanked Mayor Martinez and Council Member McIntyre for being instrumental in having the Harbor Bridge lit in rainbow Corpus Christi Page 2 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes June 21,2016 colors. Bill Word, 6018 Pinehurst, spoke regarding comments made by speakers during last week's and today's public comment regarding the lighting the Harbor Bridge in rainbow colors. Richard Throop, 14202 Encantada, presented the current housing report for Corpus Christi specific to each council district. Jack Gordy,4118 Bray,spoke regarding the palm trees on Airline Road and accessibility. Michael Rojas, Get Me, announced that the transportation network company, Get Me,will begin services in Corpus Christi on June 29, 2016. Mack Parks, Tride, announced that the transportation network company, Tride, started operations on June 11, 2016 and is excited to serve Corpus Christi. G. CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS / UPDATE ON CITY OPERATIONS: Mayor Martinez referred to City Manager's Comments. Acting City Manager Margie C. Rose reported on the following topics: a. OTHER 1)Animal Care Services received a$9,000 grant from the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA)for a Rescue/Ride Program.As part of the program, Animal Care Services is able to rescue animals and send them to various areas to be adopted.Within the last month, 38 dogs have been sent to Central Minnesota Animal Care and Control and Great Plains Humane Society Heart Rescue.An additional 20 dogs are scheduled to be sent to adoption facilities in New York. The program has been very helpful and successful for the City.2)The mid-year Solid Waste collection is in full swing and coincides with the beginning of hurricane season. The Solid Waste Department wants to make sure areas are clean and free of debris in the event of a storm. Solid Waste Operation's brush pickup is on schedule. For information,visit the website at www.cctexas.com. 3) Development Services will be implementing the new building codes and amendments beginning September 1,2016 and are encouraging residents to visit the website at www.cctexas.com to participate in a survey and schedule an educational session on the changes. 4)A public meeting on the Rodd Field Road Expansion will be held on Monday,June 27,2016 at 5:30 p.m. at Bridgeway Church of Corpus Christi to seek input on the design of the project. H. MINUTES: 2. Regular Meeting of June 14, 2016. Mayor Martinez referred to approval of the minutes. City Secretary Huerta requested that the minutes be amended to reflect the follow corrections: 1) page 4, related to the Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority appointment, changing Edward Garcia to Edward Martinez; and 2) page 9, correct the misspelling of the word, "response". Council Member Magill made a motion to amend the minutes, as stated, seconded by Council Member Rubio and passed unanimously. Council Member Chad Magill made a motion to approve the minutes as amended,seconded by Council Member Rudy Garza and passed unanimously. Corpus Christi Page 3 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes June 21,2016 I. BOARD &COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: (NONE) J. EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION: K. CONSENT AGENDA: (ITEMS 3 - 14) Approval of the Consent Agenda Mayor Martinez referred to the Consent Agenda. There were no comments from the Council or the public. City Secretary Huerta announced that Council Member Rosas was abstaining from the vote on Item 7. A motion was made by Council Member McIntyre,seconded by Council Member Garza, to approve the Consent Agenda. The consent agenda items were approved by one vote as follows: Aye: 9- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Rosas, Council Member Scott and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 3. Resolution authorizing submission of grant application for a Federal grant and Interlocal Agreement for grant funds Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to submit a grant application in the amount of$163,004 to the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance for funding eligible under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program FY 2016 Local Solicitation with 50% of the funds to be distributed to Nueces County under the established Interlocal Agreement; and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute Interlocal Agreement between the City of Corpus Christi and Nueces County to establish terms for the sharing of the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program FY 2016 Local Solicitation. This Resolution was passed on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 030874 4. Resolution awarding Service Agreements for Bayfront and Medians Turf and Grounds Maintenance and Stormwater Improved Rights-of-Way Mowing Resolution finding the lowest, responsive, responsible bidder for mowing services by grouped acreage in response to Bid Event No. 104, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114 and 115; awarding a service agreement to the lowest, responsive, responsible bidder for each acreage group; Corpus Christi Page 4 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes June 21,2016 and authorizing the City manager or designee to execute a service agreement with the lowest, responsive, responsible bidder for each acreage group for a total cost of$288,905.73 of which $72,226.43 is required for the remainder of FY 2015-2016. Agreements will be for one year with an option to extend for up to four additional one year terms, subject to the approval of the Contractor and the City Manager or designee. Funds have been budgeted by the Parks and Recreation Department in FY 2015-2016. Cut Masters Lawn Service Dorame General Repair& Lawn Corpus Christi, Texas Corpus Christi, Texas $13,692.00 $139,349.13 Texas Gulf Coast Contracting La Med Facility maintenance, Inc. dba Gulf Coast Maintenance San Antonio, Texas Corpus Christi, Texas $37,483.60 $98,381.00 This Resolution was passed on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 030875 5. Supply Agreement for chemical used for the treatment of potable drinking water at the O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Motion approving a Supply Agreement with Carus Corporation, Peru, Illinois, for approximately 720,000 wet pounds of Sodium Permanganate in accordance with Bid Invitation No. 118, based on the lowest, responsive and responsible bid for a not to exceed amount of $878,400.00 of which $219,600.00 is required for the remainder of FY 2015-2016. The term of the agreement shall be for one year with an option to extend for up to two one year terms, subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager or designee. Funds have been budgeted by the Water Department in FY 2015-2016. This Motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Enactment No: M2016-064 6. Engineering Design Contract Amendment No. 3 for the Programmed Water Line Service Life Extension for City-Wide Distribution Repair and Replacement- Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Procurement Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to proceed with delivery order preparation by executing Amendment No. 3 to the Engineering Design Contract with Urban Engineering of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$328,350, for a total restated fee not to Corpus Christi Page 5 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes June 21,2016 exceed $645,790 for the Programmed Water Line Service Life Extension for City-Wide Distribution Repair and Replacement - Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Procurement. This Motion was passed on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: M2016-065 7. Construction Contract and Materials Testing Agreement for Kostoryz Road from Brawner Parkway to Staples Street (Bond 2012, Proposition 1) Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Reytec Construction Resources, Inc. of Houston, Texas in the amount of$8,796,224.60 and a construction materials testing agreement with Rock Engineering and Laboratory, Inc. in the amount of$64,924.00 for Kostoryz Road from Brawner Parkway to Staples Street. (BOND 2012 Proposition 1) Council Member Rosas abstained from the vote on Item 7. This Motion was passed on the Consent Agenda. Aye: 8- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Scott and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 1 - Council Member Rosas Enactment No: M2016-066 8. Service Agreement for Lindale Senior Center Roof Repair Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a service agreement with South Texas Metal Roofing of Corpus Christi, Texas, for the roof repair of Lindale Senior Center, in accordance with Bid Event No. 96 based on the lowest, responsive and responsible bid for a base cost of$174,850 and an additional 10% project contingency in the amount of$17,485 for unforeseen repairs. This Motion was passed on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: M2016-067 9. Second Reading Ordinance - Rezoning property located at 3142 Masterson Drive and 6201 Kostoryz Road (1st Reading 6/14/16) Case No. 0516-01 Paisano Contractors, LLC: A change of zoning from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District to the "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District. The property is described as being 3.1 acres out of Lot 3, Section 8, Bohemian Colony Lands, and Lot 1 B, Block 1, Crestmont Unit 11 (0.76 acres), located on the northwest corner of Masterson Drive and Kostoryz Road. Corpus Christi Page 6 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes June 21,2016 Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (May 18, 2016): Approval of the change of zoning from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District to the "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District. Ordinance: Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC'), upon application by Paisano Contractors, LLC ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to 3.1 acres out of Lot 3, Section 8, Bohemian Colony Lands, and Lot 1 B, Block 1, Crestmont Unit 11 (0.76 acres), from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District to the "CN-1" Neighborhood Commercial District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 030876 10. Second Reading Ordinance -Adopting International Fire Code with local amendments (1st Reading 6/14/16) Ordinance adopting the International Fire Code, 2015 Edition, with local amendments, as the Fire Code of the City of Corpus Christi; and providing for severance, publication, penalty, and an effective date. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 030877 11. Second Reading Ordinance - Naming the park located at Coves of Lago Vista subdivision (1st Reading 6/14/16) Ordinance naming the park located at Coves of Lago Vista subdivision as Barclay Park. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 030878 12. Second Reading Ordinance -Accepting and appropriating a State grant for the Oso Bay Wetlands Preserve and Learning Center (1st Reading 6/14/16) Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute documents to accept a Community Outdoor Outreach Program grant from the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department in amount of $48,033.00 for the Observing Science Outdoors Summer Guardians 2016 with City matching funds of$4,950 and an in-kind match of $8,391, for total program funds of$61,371; appropriating the $48,033.00 grant in the No. 1067 Parks Grants fund and authorizing Corpus Christi Page 7 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes June 21,2016 the transfer of$4,950 from the No. 1020 General Fund to the No. 1067 Parks Grant fund and appropriating the same for the Observing Science Outdoors Summer Guardians 2016. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 030879 13. Second Reading Ordinance - Lease agreement for the 2016 Arts Alive! Event (1st Reading 6/14/16) Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an agreement with the Arts Community Center of Corpus Christi, Inc. to allow use of area generally bounded by current and former N. Shoreline Blvd., between Coopers Alley and Williams Street, for the Arts Alive! Event and related activities on September 1 through September 5, 2016. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 030880 14. Second Reading Ordinance - Interlocal Agreement Amendment for County Road 52 Extension Phase 1B (1st Reading 6/14/16) Ordinance amending the FY 2016 Capital Budget to add Project No. E16303 County Road 52 Phase 1 B, appropriating $100,000 of anticipated revenue from Nueces County, Texas; approving Amendment No. 1 to an Interlocal Agreement with Nueces County, Texas; and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute Change Order No. 2 with Haas Anderson Construction of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$649,017.80 for the County Road 52 project Phase 1 B for final surface treatment and completion of project. (BOND 2008) This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 030881 M. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (ITEM 19) 19. Public hearing to discuss and consider proposed Charter Amendments for the November 8, 2016 Special Election with possible action. Mayor Martinez deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 19, a public hearing on the proposed Charter Amendments for the November 8,2016 Election. Mayor Martinez opened the public hearing. John Bell, Chairman of the Charter Review Ad Hoc Committee,stated that he submitted a letter to the City Council after being contacted by former City Manager Marvin Townsend regarding Corpus Christi Page 8 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes June 21,2016 Proposition 9 relating to the sale of untreated water. Mr. Townsend considers this section of the City Charter a critical part of the City of Corpus Christi's leadership role in being a regional provider of treated and untreated water and that repealing this section would be a major step backwards. Mr. Bell stated that he has discussed this issue with City Attorney Risley and both believe there is existing authority under state law that would allow the City of Corpus Christi to sell water. This issue is more of a perception issue as opposed to a legal issue. From Mr. Townsend's perspective, repealing this section would be sending the wrong signal to the region. There were no comments from the public. City Secretary Huerta provided a brief overview of the proposed charter amendments, Propositions 1 -11 as follows: Proposition 1 Establishing a Dedicated Fund To Be Used Solely for Residential Street Reconstruction and Authorizing the City Council To Levy,Assess And Collect A Property Tax Not To Exceed Six Cents ($0.06) Per One Hundred Dollars ($100.00)Of Assessed Value For The Purpose Of Residential Street Reconstruction, Including Associated Utilities Work And Professional Engineering Services, Said Taxes To Be Maintained In This Dedicated Fund And Used Solely For The Purpose Of Residential Street Reconstruction,And Said Taxes to Be Gradually Implemented at a Rate of Not More Than Two Cents ($0.02) Per One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) Per Year. Proposition 2 Providing That The Mayor Pro Tem Shall Be The Council Member Elected At Large Who Received The Highest Number Of Votes. Proposition 3 Adjusting Total Annual Compensation For The Mayor To $24,000 And Total Annual Compensation For Each Council Member To$18,000, and Eliminating All Other Forms of Compensation, To Be Effective With The City Council Elected In 2022. Proposition 4 Allowing For Procurement Of Contracts For Independent Auditor With Terms Up To Five Years. Proposition 5 Providing For The Appointment Of Two Alternate Members To The Civil Service Board. Proposition 6 Eliminating The Prohibition On City Employees Filing For Nomination Or Election To Municipal Public Office To Comply With Texas Local Government Code Section 150.041. Proposition 7 Providing Authority To Issue Bonds In Accordance With The Laws Of The State Of Texas. Proposition 8 Clarifying The Approval Process For Leases, Updating The Statutory Corpus Christi Page 9 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes June 21,2016 Reference, And Eliminating the Waiting Periods for Leases and Lease Amendments Which Do Not Exceed 5 Years. Proposition 9 Repealing An Unnecessary Provision Regarding Untreated Water Supply Contracts. MOTION OF DIRECTION Council Member Magill made a motion directing the City Manager to remove Proposition 9, repealing an unnecessary provision regarding untreated water supply contracts,seconded by Council Member Rubio and passed unanimously. Proposition 10 Updating Legal References In The General Powers Section And Clarify The General Powers. Proposition 11 Clarifying The Procedures Regarding Purchases And Contracts in Conformity with State Law. Council members spoke regarding the following topics:feedback on Proposition 1 related to including a sunset provision of 10, 15 or 20 years; the ability to combine Propositions 4- 11 regarding housekeeping items; including information to provide clarity on the other forms of compensation referred to in Proposition 3, and concerns with Proposition 2, related to the manner in which the Mayor Pro Tem is proposed to be determined eliminating the current practice of rotating the Mayor Pro tem duties among council members. Mayor Martinez closed the public hearing. MOTION OF DIRECTION Council Member McIntyre made a motion directing the City Manager to amend Proposition 2 to include the language"in the event of the disability of the mayor",seconded by Council Member Garza, and passed unanimously. MOTION OF DIRECTION Council Member Garza made a motion directing the City Manager to move forward with Propositions 1 -8 and 10-11, as amended,seconded by Council Member Vaughn and passed unanimously. P. RECESS TO CORPORATION MEETING: (ITEM 28) Mayor Martinez deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 28. Mayor Martinez recessed the regular Council meeting to hold a special board meeting of the Corpus Christi Housing Finance Corporation. 28. Special Board Meeting of the Corpus Christi Housing Finance Corporation The Corporation Meeting was held. Q. RECONVENE COUNCIL MEETING Corpus Christi Page 10 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes June 21,2016 Mayor Martinez reconvened the regular Council meeting. M. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (ITEM 20) 20. Public Hearing and First Reading Ordinance regarding the City of Corpus Christi's proposed FY2016-2017 Consolidated Annual Action Plan Ordinance to adopt the fiscal year (FY) 2016-2017 Consolidated Annual Action Plan (CAAP), for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and the HOME Investment Parterships (HOME) Programs; to authorize the City Manager or designee to submit the FY2016-2017 CAAP to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and to amend if required by HUD; to authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept and appropriate upon receipt the grants from HUD into the Grant Fund No. 1059 for the approved FY2016-2017 CAAP projects and further to execute funding agreements and all other documents necessary to implement the FY2016-2017 CAAP with organizations of approved projects. Mayor Martinez referred to Item 20. Director of Housing and Community Development Rudy Bentancourt stated that the purpose of this item is to adopt the FY2016-2017 Consolidated Annual Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant(CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant(ESG)and the HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Programs. Mr. Bentancourt provided the entitlement allocations received from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development as follows: CDBG -$2,404,606, ESG -$221,468, and HOME -$868,482; and information regarding staff's recommendations. Mayor Martinez opened the public hearing. Linda McKamie, 1279 Glenoak Drive,spoke on behalf of Catholic Charities of Corpus Christi and expressed appreciation for staff's recommendations. Ms. McKamie explained that CDBG funding will be used to upgrade accessibility at its newly relocated facility and ESG funding will be used to assist with case management and rental assistance. Niki Kiruki, Director of Operations at the Boys and Girls Club, thanked staff for their recommendation for CDBG funding to renovate the Teen Center. Ms. Kiruki stated that the Boys and Girls Club's mission is to enable all youth and provide a positive focus for teens in Corpus Christi. Mayor Martinez closed the public hearing. Council members spoke regarding the following topics: how the CDBG funding for Ben Garza Park Improvements will impact discussions regarding the leasing of that facility; requests for additional information on the CDBG HCD - Single Family Rehabilitation Program, including the number served, price point and how the program operates;feedback on the balances each year for the following CDBG programs: Police -Code Enforcement Program, Police - Demolition Program, and Police-Clearance of Vacant Properties Program; staff's evaluation of ESG requests that do not have any revenue other than client payments;the ability to assist more homeowners with the grant funding from the CDBG -Appliance Replacement Grant Program; a description of the improvements for CDBG Parks and Recreation -Sacky Park Improvements; Corpus Christi Page 11 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes June 21,2016 whether funding for HOME -Affordable Housing Project/Program is designated to a specific non-profit or open to affordable housing programs; and any funding considerations during this fiscal year for the relocation of residents related to the new Harbor Bridge. Council Member Rubio made a motion to approve the ordinance,seconded by Council Member Garza. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Rosas, Council Member Scott and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 S. BRIEFINGS: (ITEM 32) 32. Financial Audit of the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) by Jerry Van Beveren from Flusche, Van Beveren, Kilgore, PC Mayor Martinez deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 32, financial audit of the Regional Transportation Authority(RTA). Jerry Van Beveren of Flusche,Van Beveren, Kilgore P.C.,stated that the firm was engaged to perform a reveiw of the RTA's internal controls and to explore issues related to their recent fraud activity. Mr. Van Beveren referred to the conclusions regarding the detection of and response to the fraud activity and reported that the RTA responded quickly to the matter and conducted a thorough investigation. The RTA had their internal investigation reviewed by an outside auditor, Collier Johnson &Woods, and the Corpus Christi Police Department. Mr.Van Beveren stated that the audit concludes that the RTA's response was sufficient and timely. The reason the fraud activity occurred was due to a lapse in the RTA's internal controls. However, the RTA's internal controls were also how the fraudulent activity was identified. Mr.Van Beveren stated that the audit provided recommendations to address the internal controls and that the RTA had changed their internal controls prior to any auditor making recommendations. Council members spoke regarding the following topics:the recommendation to identify potential conflicts of interest to include vendors; appreciation to the City Council for initiating the financial audit and the members of the internal audit team which included Tom Niskala, Nueces County Judge Loyd Neal and City Manager Ron Olson; the plan for implementation moving forward; and whether the RTA has an ethics policy in place, including financial disclosure requirements for board members. L. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (ITEMS 15 - 18) Mayor Martinez referred to the day's executive sessions. The Council went into executive session. Council Member Magill abstained from the discussion on Item 18. 15. Executive session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 for consultation with attorneys regarding collective bargaining matters, Corpus Christi Page 12 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes June 21,2016 (including litigation) between the City of Corpus Christi and the Corpus Christi Firefighters Association. This E-Session Item was discussed in executive session. 16. Executive session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to conveyance, lease, and sale of City property and pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.072 to discuss and deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, and value of real property located at 521 Josephine Street known as Ben Garza Park and Gym when deliberation in open meeting would have a detrimental effect on the position of the governmental body in negotiations with a third person. This E-Session Item was discussed in executive session. 17. Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to proposed improvements to the Park Road 22 canal and pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.087 to discuss confidential commercial or financial information pertaining to entities that the City seeks to have locate, stay or expand within the City limits along Park Road 22 and with which the City is conducting economic development negotiations and to deliberate possible offers of financial or other incentives to said business prospect(s) This E-Session Item was discussed in executive session. 18. Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to the annexation of property adjacent to City limits, 14 C.F.R. § 77.31, 14 CFR§ 77.9, Section 358 of Public Law 111-383, Part 211 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), the Consolidated Appropriations Act 2016 (H.R. 2029, Sec 301), topics of the aforementioned statutes and regulations, and related statutes and regulations. City Secretary Huerta announced that Council Member Magill abstained from the discussion on Item 18. This E-Session Item was discussed in executive session. S. BRIEFINGS: (ITEMS 29 - 31 and 33) 29. Ad Hoc Residential Street Infrastructure Advisory Committee Final Report *Approximate Time will be 4:00 pm* Mayor Martinez deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 29. Andy Taubman, Chairman of the Ad Hoc Residential Street Infrastructure Committee Corpus Christi Page 13 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes June 21,2016 (Committee),stated that the purpose of this item to provide a briefing on the Committee's recommendations. Mr. Taubman introduced the Committee members present: Toby Futrell, Richard Stracener, Kyle Pape, and Javier Huerta. Adria Schreiber-Garza, Business Manager for the Office of Public Works, responded to questions from the City Council. Mr. Taubman presented the Committee's first finding: the amount of money that Corpus Christi would have to spend to maintain and replace residential streets on a a 60-year cycle would be approximately$71 million per year and that this amount does not include spending for arterial or collector streets. Mr. Taubman further presented the Committee's following findings and recommendations for Process Observations included the following:2.1 the City track job cost at the street level;2.2.the City use the contracting methods of IDIQ, Micro-IDIQ and Project Bid method, in addition to tasking City-internal work crews to perform the work to maintain and rebuild the streets;2.3.the City should pay contractors promptly; 2.4 the creation of an acquisition planning role for purchasing and contract administration;2.5 the City design and implement process and system improvement to document cost, geo-spatial parameters, and performance measures;2.6 the City define a formal process in place for the intake, evaluation,trial, and acceptance of new technologies;2.7 budgetary savings that result from understaffing, unfilled vacancies and under-compensation have a real cost impact on the project themselves;2.8 there is a need for construction project management; 2.9 the continuation of the Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP)seal coat program and track the data for effectiveness;2.10 the continuation of the SPMP overlay program with a reallocation to increase spending on residential collector streets;2.11 the prioritization of incremental spending on arterial/collector streets; 2.12 the grandfathering of Street Design; 2.13 the City consider improved street standards or construction damage mitigation such as increased warranties, delayed acceptance, or delayed installation guaranteed by performance bonds;2.14 the City consider a strategy to address street construction in the ETJ to limit exposure to increased costs if those roads become the City's responsibility through annexation; and 2.15 the City evaluate the stormwater problem outside of the purview of this Committee. The Committee's recommendations and findings for Street Treatment Types included the following: 3.1 the City funds a program of residential street spending to achieve a Targeted Area Reclamation (TAR), with a defined budget amount and program cycle time for proactive, intensive maintenance; 3.2 fund a residential street spending program to be known as Rebuild,with a defined budget amount. Mr. Taubman referred to the recommendations regarding Prioritizing Street Rebuilding: 4.0 Prioritizing street rebuilding according to a process that considers road condition, safety, maintenance history, proximity to schools, population density, utility coordination,transportation coordination and road network connectivity. The Committee offerred Reconstruction Scenarios and made recommendation regarding financing and communications. Council members and the presentation team discussed the following topics: whether staff is already tracking at the street level and when the tracking began; current use of the Micro-IDIQ;the Weaver report's findings indicating the need to speed up the payment process for contractors;the legal requirement regarding the time frame allowed for paying vendors; the number Corpus Christi Page 14 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes June 21,2016 of inspectors to approve a street; the acquisition planning role;whether improvements to the information systems are factored into the budget costs; contracting project managers when staffing levels are low;the need to increase staffing levels to manage the work; reallocating the spending to improvement the quality of residential collector streets;the current allocation through the SPMP; grandfathering of street design standards; the number of subdivisions grandfathered; how long the grandfathering law has been in effect; a formal process for accepting streets in subdivisions; rezoning of platted property; concerns with TAR cycle by segment in each district; pavement index condition (PCI) measurements; creation of a workplan to target areas by need; reconstruction scenarios; next steps for implementation; an audit work plan; addressing adequate staffing for the Street Department during the budget process;standards for new construction; and extraterritorial jurisdiction recommendations. 31. Nueces County Truancy Committee Final Report and Recommendations *Approximate Time will be 5:00 pm* Mayor Martinez referred to Item 31. Director of Intergovernmental Relations Tom Tagliabue stated that the purpose of this item is to provide a briefing on the final recommendations of the Nueces County Truancy Committee (Committee)dealing with the statutory changes to de-criminalize truancy and focus on prevention. John Milam, Deputy Director of the Nueces County Juvenile Department, along with Committee members Judge Gail Loeb,Judge Inna Rogoff-Klein, and Judge Thelma Rodriguez presented this item. Mr. Milan provided the following information:the committee's membership; background on House Bill 2398 and Senate Bill 107; and the Committee's recommendations on the following six(6)goals each county is required to review: 1)a uniform process for filing truancy cases with truancy courts;2) uniform administrative procedures; 3) uniform deadlines for processing truancy cases;4)a local plan with strategies to address truancy, including effective prevention, intervention, and diversion methods to reduce truancy and referrals to a truancy; 5) a system for tracking truancy information and sharing information among school districts, open-enrollment charter schools, truancy courts,juvenile courts, and juvenile probation departments in the county; and 6) any changes to statutes or state agency rules the Committee determines are necessary to address truancy. Council members spoke regarding the following topics:whether state legislators who pushed to decriminalize truancy offered any solutions;the processes or methods used in other states regarding truancy compliance; evidence-based programs; criminalization of truancy having stigmatized children with a criminal record; local control of the process;the recommendation to limit truancy cases to two courts; and increasing a the number of case managers. 30. Discussion regarding the proposed ballot for November 8, 2016 election Mayor Martinez deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 30. City Secretary Rebecca Huerta stated that the purpose of this item is to review the draft ballot language for the General and Special Elections being held on November 8,2016 and to obtain direction from Council on the sales and use tax authorization. Direction on the Charter Amendments was provided during Corpus Christi Page 15 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes June 21,2016 the discussion on Item 19. City Secretary Huerta stated that the first reading of the election ordinance is scheduled for August 9,2016,with the second reading scheduled for August 16, 2016. The General Election is related to the election of the mayor and eight council members. The list of candidates and races will be determined after the end of the filing period which is scheduled from July 25,2016 to August 22,2016. The first item on the Special Election is Proposition 1, regarding the sales tax authorization. The draft language of which includes the direction provided during the March 22, 2016 city council retreat,which included: general sales and use tax with allocations of up to$500,000 for affordable workforce housing,45%for economic development projects, and the remainder for construction, repair and maintenance of residential streets;with a term of 15 years. Iain Vasey, President/CEO of the Corpus Christi Regional Economic Development Corporation (EDC)stated that the EDC Board recommended the following: a Type B structure; with a minimum of 50%for economic development; up to$500,000 for affordable housing; the balance to arterial and collector streets; continuation of the sales tax for a term of 20 years; maintaining a review/recommendation panel; and appropriate protection mechanisms to ensure the funds for economic development are maintained. The Type A Board recommended the following: a Type B structure; $3 million for streets (set amount); $500,000 for affordable housing (set amount); and the remainder for Economic Development. Council members discussed the following topics: removal of the general sales and use tax;the Type B structure not allowing for residential streets; other funding sources for residential streets;that the general sales tax structure could be used for residential streets; debt service availability;the Council's priority to address residential streets; that the public would support a residential rebuild program;the 2014 Arlington bond which defined the program and criteria for the types of streets,exploring the ability to change the wording from affordable housing to housing initiatives; and support for the EDC's recommendation. MOTION OF DIRECTION Council Member Garza made a motion directing the City Manager to move forward with the ballot language recommended by the EDC Board: a Type B structure;with a minimum of 50%for economic development; up to$500,000 for affordable housing;the balance to arterial and collector streets; continuation of the sales tax for a term of 20 years,seconded by Council Member Magill and passed unanimously(Council Member Vaughn -absent). City Secretary Huerta referred to the remaining proposed ballot items: Proposition 2 regarding the continuation of the Crime Control District for ten years and the Charter Amendments, as previously discussed in Item 19. City Secretary Huerta explained the other possible propositions:two(2)initiative petitions, one regarding"Cite and Release"for Class B Misdemeanors due June 24,2016,the other related to Transportation Network Companies due July 29,2016; as well as one (1) recall petition due July 8,2016. MOTION OF DIRECTION Council Member Magill made a motion directing the City Manager to move Corpus Christi Page 16 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes June 21,2016 forward with the ballot language presented regarding the Crime Control and Prevention District,seconded by Council Member Garza and passed unanimously(Council Member Vaughn -absent). 33. Beach Operation and Maintenance Funding Update Mayor Martinez deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 33. Interim Director of Parks &Recreation Stacie Talbert Anaya stated that the purpose of this item is to provide a presentation regarding the resources used to maintain and provides services at the parks and beaches. The Parks and Recreation Department maintains two(2) bay beaches: McGee Beach, approximately.3 miles and City-owned; and North Beach, approximately 1 mile,which is leased from the Texas General Land Office. Both bay beaches are maintained by the Tourist District team and patrolled by Park Enforcement officers. The bay beaches are funded from the General Fund and State Hotel Occupancy Tax (HOT)fund. The Parks and Recreation Department is also responsible for the Gulf Beach, approximately 7.9 miles. Maintenance of the Gulf Beach is driven by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit,which influences the City's drafting of its adaptive beach maintenance plan. Operational activities include: sale of beach parking permits; maintenance of driving lanes; patrol of Beach Enforcement Offices; lifeguards and Packery Channel patrol. Gulf Beach activities are funded from the General Fund, local and state HOT funds,the Tax Increment Financing Fund (TIF), and General Land Office reimbursements. Ms. Anaya provided a chart detailing expenditures per beach. A council member and Ms.Anaya discussed the following topics: funding for North Beach renourishment;whether state HOT funds can be used for beach cleaning; North Beach qualifying for state HOT funds; and the ability to continue using the Texas General Land Office's Coastal Erosion Management Program to renourish North Beach and McGee Beach. N. REGULAR AGENDA: (ITEMS 21 - 25) 21. One Reading Action Item -Appropriating Unreserved Funds into Employee Health Benefits Fund to cover claim expenditures for the remainder of the fiscal year Ordinance appropriating $6,500,000 from the Unreserved Fund Balance in Fund No. 5610 Employee Health Benefits - Citicare; appropriating $845,863 from the Unreserved Fund Balance in Fund No. 5609 Employee Health Benefits - Police; appropriating $605,263 from the Unreserved Fund Balance in Fund No. 5608 Employee Health Benefits - Fire; amending the FY2016 Operating Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030620 to increase expenditures by $7,951,126; and declaring an emergency. Mayor Martinez deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 21. Interim Director of Human Resources Steven Viera stated that the purpose of this item is to request an iincrease in the amount budgeted for the City's Citicare, Citicare Fire and Citicare Police health plans to cover claim expenditures for the remaining FY2016 budget period. Mr.Viera presented a snapshot of the budgets for the following: Citicare Plan,the general employee health plan; Citicare Police plan; and Citicare Fire plan. Mr. Viera provided an overview of Corpus Christi Page 17 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes June 21,2016 the driving factors resulting in increased costs in the health plans including: the Affordable Care Act(ACA); inpatient costs; prescription drug cost increases related to the ACA; increased utilization of emergency room facilities; outpatient costs; and a chart detailing how the ACA mandates have impacted the health plan and resulted in increased costs. Mr. Viera stated that staff is working to implement the following recommendations: proposed premium increase for employees, retirees and dependents in the Citicare and Citicare Police plans; plan design changes for Citicare related to deductibles, co-pays, emergency room, and diagnostic care;focus on employee education; meeting with the leadership of the Corpus Christi Police Officers'Association regarding the status of the plan,the need for premium increases, and how the ACA has impacted the police plan, including increased costs; and preliminary discussions with the Corpus Firefighters'Association regarding the fire plan and impacts. Council members and Mr.Viera discussed the following topics:the percent changes in deductibles and premium increases;the national epidemic regarding health insurance and cost;the health of the reserve funds even with removing the$7.9 million out of the fund balance;that the employee-only premium has not been increased since 2010 and the City has not experienced a rate increase in the last three years;employee education;when the plan information will be ready; monitoring mechanisms; and keeping rates competitive for recruitment purposes. There were no comments from the public. Council Member McIntyre made a motion to approve the ordinance,seconded by Council Member Scott. This Ordinance was passed on emergency reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 8- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Rosas and Council Member Scott Absent: 1 - Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 Enactment No: 030882 22. Engineering Design Contract for Sea Town (aka S.E.A. District) Pedestrian Improvements (Bond 2012, Proposition 8) Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an Engineering Design Contract with LJA Engineering, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$157,806.71 for the SeaTown (aka S.E.A. District) Pedestrian Improvements project for engineering design services. (Bond 2012, Proposition 8). Mayor Martinez referred to Item 22. Director of Engineering Services Jeff Edmonds stated that the purpose of this item is to award an engineering design contract for the SeaTown (aka S.E.A. District) Pedestrian Improvement project, Bond 2012 Proposition 8. During the discussion on this item at the June 14,2016 city council meeting,there was a question raised regarding the project budget related to the Corpus Christi Downtown Management District. Corpus Christi Page 18 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes June 21,2016 This project is outside the limits of the Downtown Management District and none of the funds will be used to reimburse the Downtown Management District. Council Member Magill made a motion to remove the Downtown Management District charge of$55,000 from the project budget,seconded by Council Member McIntyre and passed unanimously(Council Members Scott and Vaughn -absent). There were no comments from the public. Council Member Mclnt made a motion to approve the motion, seconded by Council Member Magill. This Motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Aye: 7- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio and Council Member Rosas Absent: 2- Council Member Scott and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 Enactment No: M2016-068 23. Appointing Financial Advisor for Issuance of Utility System Revenue Refunding Bonds Motion authorizing the appointment of and approving the contract for M. E. Allison, & Co., as Financial Advisor for the issuance of the "City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016", in an amount not to exceed $84,735,000. Mayor Martinez referred to Item 23. Director of Financial Services Constance Sanchez stated that the purpose of this item is to authorize the appointment of M. E.Allison &Co. as Financial Advisor for the issuance of Utility System Revenue Refunding Bonds. There were no comments from the Council or the public. Council Member Rubio made a motion to approve the motion, seconded by Council Member Hunter. This Motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Aye: 7- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio and Council Member Rosas Absent: 2- Council Member Scott and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 Enactment No: M2016-069 24. Second Reading Ordinance -Authorizing the Issuance of Utility System Revenue Refunding Bonds (1st Reading 6/14/16) Corpus Christi Page 19 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes June 21,2016 Ordinance authorizing the issuance of"City of Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016" in an amount not to exceed $84,735,000; making provisions for the payment and security thereof by a junior and inferior lien on and pledge of the net revenues of the City's Utility System on a parity with certain currently outstanding utility system revenue obligations; stipulating the terms and conditions for the issuance of additional Revenue Bonds on a parity therewith; prescribing the form, terms, conditions, and resolving other matters incident and related to the issuance, sale, and delivery of the Bonds; including the approval and distribution of an official statement pertaining thereto; authorizing the execution of a paying agent/registrar agreement, an escrow agreement, and a purchase contract; complying with the requirements imposed by the letter of representations previously executed with the depository trust company; delegating the authority to certain members of the City staff to execute certain documents relating to the sale of the bonds, and providing an effective date. Mayor Martinez referred to Item 24. Director of Financial Services Constance Sanchez stated that the purpose of this item is to authorize the issuance of Utility System Revenue Refunding Bonds in an amount not to exceed $84,735,000. There were no comments from the Council or the public. Council Member Rubio made a motion to approve the ordinance,seconded by Council Member McIntyre. This Ordinance was passed on second reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 8- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Rosas and Council Member Scott Absent: 1 - Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 Enactment No: 030883 25. Second Reading Ordinance -Amending State Speed Limit in Certain Zones Along Shoreline Drive and Ennis Joslin Road (1st Reading 6/14/16) Ordinance amending the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 53, Article VIII, Section 53-254 Schedule V, Increase of State Speed Limit in Certain Zones by adding Ennis Joslin from Wooldridge Road to Holly Road and updating North and South Shoreline Boulevard and amending Section 53-255 Schedule VI, Decrease of State Law Maximum Speed by removing East Shoreline Boulevard Mayor Martinez referred to Item 25. Director of Engineering Services Jeff Edmonds stated that the purpose of this item is to amend the City's Code of Ordinances by amending the State speed limit in certain zones along Shoreline Drive and Ennis Joslin Road. City Attorney Miles K. Risley explained that the Corpus Christi Page 20 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes June 21,2016 ordinance would need to be amended prior to second reading to include the language"providing for severance; and providing for publication". There were no comments from the public. Council Member McIntyre made a motion to amend the ordinance as stated, seconded by Council Member Rubio and passed unanimously(Council Member Vaughn -absent). In response to a council member, Mr. Edmonds stated that the changes to the Code of Ordinances were approved by the Transportation Advisory Commission. Council Member McIntyre made a motion to approve the ordinance, as amended,seconded by Council Member Garza. This Ordinance was passed on second reading, as amended, and approved with the following vote: Aye: 8- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Rosas and Council Member Scott Absent: 1 - Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 Enactment No: 030884 O. FIRST READING ORDINANCES: (ITEMS 26 -27) 26. First Reading Ordinance - CenturyLink Communications, LLC renewal of Conduit Use Agreement for Telecommunications Ordinance authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a ten-year Conduit Use Agreement with CenturyLink Communications, L.L.C., to install and maintain telecommunications facilities within city conduit located in Ocean Drive right-of-way between Ennis Joslin Road and Sand Dollar Blvd. in consideration of$7,886.00 annual revenue payment, to be increased by 4% annually. Mayor Martinez referred to Item 26. Director of Information Technology Belinda Mercardo stated that the purpose of this item is to execute a renewal of a conduit use agreement with CenturyLink Communications. The City-owned conduit is located in the Ocean Drive right-of-way between Ennis Joslin and Sand Dollar Drive and CenturyLink has fiber optic cable in the conduit. In year 1, CenturyLink will pay to the City$7,886 for the use of the conduit and the revenue will be placed in the General Fund. The city council previously approved three five-year conduit use agreements. This agreement will be for ten years with an annual increase in the revenue payment of 4% per year. There were no comments from the public. Council members spoke regarding the following topics:the reason for lengthening the term of the agreement to ten years; the type of services CenturyLink provides;the ability to trade or consolidate services with Corpus Christi Page 21 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes June 21,2016 Centuryl-ink;the increase of 4% per year in revenue; and opportunities for communication companies to invest in utilizing their conduit and the City's conduit for communication improvements. Council Member Rubio made a motion to approve the ordinance,seconded by Council Member McIntyre. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 8- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Rosas and Council Member Scott Absent: 1 - Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 27. First Reading Ordinance -Amending lease agreement to add additional parking spaces for lesee of City parking lot located at Mann Street and Mesquite Street Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an amendment to the lease agreement with the Results Companies for the City parking lot located at Mann Street and Mesquite Street to allow the lease of the entire City parking lot Mayor Martinez referred to Item 27. Business Liaison Alyssa Barrera stated that the purpose of this item is to amend the lease agreement with Results Company by increasing the number of parking spaces in the Mann Parking lot by an additional 36 spaces,with an additional revenue of$3,600 per year. There were no comments from the Council or the public. Council Member McIntyre made a motion to approve the ordinance,seconded by Council Member Rubio. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 8- Mayor Martinez, Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Rosas and Council Member Scott Absent: 1 - Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 R. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: (NONE) T. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:38 p.m. Corpus Christi Page 22 Printed on 7/7/2016 City Of Corpus Christi CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BOARD DETAILS SIZE 5 Seats The Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation is organized TERM LENGTH 2 Years exclusively for the purpose of benefiting OVERVIEW TERM LIM IT 6 Years and accomplishing public purposes of, and to act on behalf of the City, to undertake, maintain and finance projects through Propositions 4 and 5 approved by voters on November 7, 2000 and Propositions 2, 2a and 2b approved by voters on November 5, 2002. COMPOSITION The affairs of the Corporation shall be managed by a board of directors which ERk shall be composed of five persons appointed by the City Council.The terms of the directors shall be two years,expiring on July 31st of each year. Directors may be appointed to succeed themselves. No Director may serve longer than six years consecutively,unless such service is required to complete an unexpired term. DETAILS Each director must be a resident and qualified elector of the City. CREATION 1 AUTHORITY Res. No.024207,9-12-00; Res. No.024233,9-25-00. MEETS 3rd Monday of every month at 3:00 p.m.,City Hall-Council Chambers. Meet a minimum of once a quarter. TERM DETAILS All terms for two years. DEPARTMENT City Manager's Office COMMITTEE/SUBCOMMITEE N/A AGENDAS OTHER INFORMATION CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Page 1 of 1 Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation Members July 12,2016 Three(3)vacancies with terms to 7-31-18. Bart Braselton CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Seeking reappointment District 5 2 7/31/2016 Member 83% 10/12 Debbie Lindsey-Opel CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Seeking reappointment District 4 2 7/31/2016 Vice-President 83% 10/12 Randy L.Maldonado CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Seeking reappointment District 5 Partial 7/31/2016 Member 100% 6/6 Gabriel Guerra CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Active District 5 2 7/31/2017 Member R.Bryan Gulley CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Active District 4 3 7/31/2017 President Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation Applicants July 12,2016 Boards Applying For ==Ed& M��� 11 Robert A.Alvarez CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION District 5 ALVAREZ INSURANCE GROUP 5810 S.Staples Corpus Christi TX 361-442-6799 yes Scott H.Mesmer CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION District 4 CAE Corpus Christi TX 361-944-8401 yes Diana Summers CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION District4 HOGAN HOMES 400 Mann St. Corpus Christi TX 512-994-8786 yes BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FORA CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Jul 05, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Robert A Alvarez Prefix First Name Middle Last Name Initial Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ETHICS COMMISSION, TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMISSION Street Address Suite orApt oft City State Postal Code District 5 What district do you live in? lwwwwm� Primary Phone Alternate Phone Alvarez Insurance Group Owner/Broker Employer Job Title 5810 S. Staples WorkAddress-StreetAddressand Suite Number Corpus Christi WorkAddress-City Texas WorkAddress-State 78413 WorkAddress-Zip Code RobertAAlvarez Page 1 of 4 3614426799 r.adam@alvarezinsgroup.com Work E-mail address Home/Primary Address Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: No. Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Promoter of locality and professional networking in the Corpus Christi community for my own insurance agency. Registered Voter? QQ Yes Q No Current resident of the city? QQ Yes O No 32 If yes,how many years? Adam s Resume 2014 1 .docx Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Hispanic Robert AAlvarez Page 2 of 4 Male Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. ® IAgree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. ® IAgree Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. ® IAgree Board-specific questions (if applicable) Robert AAlvarez Page 3 of 4 Question applies to CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESSAND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. Are you a qualified elector* of the City? QQ Yes O No Question applies to multiple boards. *Qualified elector/voter means a person who is 18 years of age or older; a United States Citizen; has not been determined by a final judgement of a court to be mentally incapacitated; has not been finally convicted of a felony or, if so convicted has fully discharged the person's sentence including incarceration, parole or supervision, or completed a period of probation ordered by an court; and a resident of this State. Question applies to TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMISSION. Per city ordinance, at least one member of this commission shall represent the bicycling community. Do you qualify for this category? Q Yes QQ No Robert AAlvarez Page 4 of 4 Robert Adam Alvarez Objective Summary: To utilize my skills and abilities to better the customer/client experience and satisfaction and to further the success of the business. Areas of Expertise: ,/ Typing—over 65 words ,/ Strong multitasker ,/ Expert with all MS Office per minute applications and other ,/ Very fast learner computer programs ,/ Strong use of multi-line phone and soft-phones ,/ Experienced in data entry ,/ Expert in creating and and 10-key with good filing reports ,/ Extremely clean speed and accuracy background and driving ,/ Excellent people skills record ,/ Highly professional Experience Nonferrous Supervisor, CMC Recycling, Corpus Christi,TX, June 2013—Present Day • Run day-to-day operations at nonferrous scale. • Take care of customer's needs and work to retain them. • Supervised a crew of 5-10 people. Office Assistant, J&G Armadillo Bookkeeping, Corpus Christi,TX,June 2008—June 2013 • Helped with day to day clerical operations/filing in running the office. • Gather all necessary data to completing tax returns,i.e. receipts, legal documents, home information, etc. • Keyed in proper data into databases of all financial info utilizing the 10-key. (Primary) File Clerk, Royston, Rayzor,Vickery &Williams,LLC., May 2007—August 2008 • Prepared and set up project for transition of traditional paper system to modified"paperless" filing system. • Responsible for filing and indexing for a 10 lawyer law firm and assisting paralegals and runners. Education University of Dallas—Irving —August 2001 to June 2004-Bachelors of Science in Business with Concentration in Marketing Texas A&M—Corpus Christi—August 2000 to May 2001 —Criminal Justice Robert Adam Alvarez 0 Page 2 of 2 References available upon request... BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FORA CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Jul 05, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Scott H Mesmer Prefix First Name Middle Last Name Initial Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? AIRPORT BOARD, CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, CORPUS CHRISTI REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ETHICS COMMISSION, NUECES COUNTYTAXAPPRAISAL DISTRICT OILAND GAS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Street Address Suite orApt oft City State Postal Code District 4 What district do you live in? lmwmn��� Primary Phone Alternate Phone CAE Instructor Employer Job Title WorkAddress-StreetAddressand Suite Number Corpus Christi WorkAddress-City TX WorkAddress-State Scott H Mesmer Page 1 of 5 7841 WorkAddress-Zip Code 3619448401 Work Phone Scott.Mesmer@gmail.com Work E-mail address Home/Primary Address Preferred Mailing lAdress Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) BS Applied Math and Statistics BA Economics. Military Contract T44 Sim Flight Instructor for CAE Captain on B757 for Parallel Express Own Rental Properties "SoftengineHR" Payroll and Human Capital Management Software sales rep Registered Voter? Q Yes Q No Current resident of the city? Q Yes 0 No 7 If yes,how many years? Scott Mesmer City Application_Resume.docx Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Scott H Mesmer Page 2 of 5 Demographics Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Ethnicity Male nd-r Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. ® IAgree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. ® IAgree Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. ® IAgree Scott H Mesmer Page 3 of 5 Board-specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESSAND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. Are you a qualified elector* of the City? QQ Yes Q No Question applies to NUECES COUNTYTAXAPPRAISAL DISTRICT. Are you a resident and qualified elector* of the District (Nueces County)? QQ Yes Q No Question applies to NUECES COUNTYTAXAPPRAISAL DISTRICT. Have you resided in the District for at least 2 years? QQ Yes O No Question applies to OIL AND GAS ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? ® Not Connected with Oil and Gas Well Industry Scott H Mesmer Page 4 of 5 Question applies to multiple boards. *Qualified elector/voter means a person who is 18 years of age or older; a United States Citizen; has not been determined by a final judgement of a court to be mentally incapacitated; has not been finally convicted of a felony or, if so convicted has fully discharged the person's sentence including incarceration, parole or supervision, or completed a period of probation ordered by an court; and a resident of this State. Scott H Mesmer Page 5 of 5 Scott H. Mesmer Goal: Looking to give back and work with in the community that I live in by supporting the city in any way that I can. Business Development, Management and Investing Experience Own multiple rental properties in Corpus Christi Invested in Oil and Gas Drilling Rig program as well as Oil Drilling programs September 2015 to present SoftEngineHr sales consultant. Payroll and Human Capital Management software sales position August 2009 to present Co-Owner of Mesmerizing photography. Discovered what it means to be an owner of a business... September 2009-Present: Elan Express and Parallel Express Business Development Set up Jet Fuel Brokering Business, created relationships with into plane agents, refineries, airport fbo etc to sell jet fuel to clients as well as managed aircraft. Developed relationships for marketing for aircraft parts, aircraft RVSM ferry movements, aircraft acquisitions. Jan 2007 to March 2009 Base Operations Manager for large aircraft international charter operations. Responsible for day to day operations of the base, duties included but not limited to, recommending staffing levels, developed recommendations for policy and procedures for operational needs, involved in hiring and selection process, ensured crewmember compliance with company policy, assigned non-flight duties in support of operations and marketing. Coordinated aircraft charter needs with Director of Operations, Director of Security, Manager of Maintenance, Dispatch, Marketing Department and crew to ensure high quality client experience and safety of flight for international operations. Worked with Director of Planning and Scheduling as well as Training Department to develop and staff monthly flight schedule. Coordinate with Brokers, Clientele, flight crew and management to ensure proper communication flow for process improvement, staff promotions, cost savings initiatives, and other duties not defined that are aimed at reducing costs while increasing productivity without sacrificing quality or safety. Aviation Work Experience CAE Feb 2014 to Present T44 Advanced Flight Sim Instructor& Platform Instructor Parallel Express Oct 2013 to -Part 125 B757 Simulator Chk Airman Oct 2013 to—Part 125 B757 Captain Elan Express Nov 2011 to - Part 125 B757 Simulator Chk Airman Oct 2009 to - Part 125 B757 Captain Swift Aviation Group Dec 11 to—July 13 Part 121 B767 Simulator Chk Airman June 10 to July 13 Part 121 B767 Captain Polaris Aviation Solutions —Jan 10 to June 10 SIC Pt 125 Dallas Mavericks Captain/Base Manager -Pace Airlines Oct 2002 to Oct 2009 B757/B767 Captain Domestic/International Part 121 Captain on B757 for FAA proving runs and check rides to add areas of operations to Airline Ops Specs such as the North Pacific, Polar Ops and North Atlantic Etops. Domestic and International worldwide charter operations that required operations into Russia, the Middle East, South America, Europe, the Pacific and Polar Areas of the Arctic Circle Flight Officer—USAirways May 99 to Jan 02 Pt 121 First Officer B757/B767 A320 Flight Officer—USAirways Express,Piedmont Airlines July 97 to May 99 Pt 121 First Officer DASH 8 1600 Hours of ME Turbo Prop time Flight Officer—KIWI International Airlines July 95 to Oct 96 Pt 121 Flight Engineer—B727 Charter Pilot/Flight Instructor—Airpark Sales & Service Oct 96 to July 97 PIC Piper Navajo Pt 135 Co Instructor&Asst Chf Pilot Feb 93 to July 95 PIC Piper Navajo Captain on DOD contract such as: Shuttling civilian engineers and military personal between military bases such as Patuxent River, Lakehurst, Dahlgren, Wallops Island Virginia and Cherry Point. Range clearing of oceanic restricted areas in support of F-18 testing program, missile test fire and other military operations. CFI and CFII Instructor Platform Instructor Education SUNY @STONYBROOK: Stonybrook,New York 1990 BS Applied Math and Statistics BA Economics BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FORA CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Jul 05, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Diana Summers Prefix First Name Middle Last Name Initial Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, CORPUS CHRISTI REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, PLANNING COMMISSION Street Address Suite orApt City State Postal Code District 4 What district do you live in? lwwwwm� Primary Phone Alternate Phone HOGAN HOMES CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER Employer Job Title 400 MANN ST. WorkAddress-StreetAddressand Suite Number CORPUS CHRISTI WorkAddress-City WorkAddress-State 78401 WorkAddress-Zip Code Diana Summers Page 1 of 4 512-994-8786 Work Phone Work E-mail address Home/Primary Address Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: NO Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) SEE ATTACHED RESUME BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, DOUBLE MAJORED IN FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING FROM UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 2009 MASTERS OF ACCOUNTING FROM COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON, 2010 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: PRICE WATERHOUSE COOPERS, LLC, DALLAS:AUDITASSOCIATE 2010-2011; DELOITTE AND TOUCHE, LLC,AUSTIN: AUDIT SENIOR ASSOCIATE 2011-2013; HOGAN HOMES,ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT 2013-PRESENT MEMBER OF CORPUS CHRISTI ROTARY CLUB Registered Voter? Q Yes 0 No Current resident of the city? Q Yes Q No 4 If yes,how many years? BROWN.pdf Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Diana Summers Page 2 of 4 Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Ethnicity Gender Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. ® IAgree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. ® IAgree Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. ® IAgree Diana Summers Page 3 of 4 Board-specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESSAND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. Are you a qualified elector* of the City? QQ Yes O No Question applies to PLANNING COMMISSION. Are you a registered voter of the City of Corpus Christi? QQ Yes Q No Question applies to multiple boards. *Qualified elector/voter means a person who is 18 years of age or older; a United States Citizen; has not been determined by a final judgement of a court to be mentally incapacitated; has not been finally convicted of a felony or, if so convicted has fully discharged the person's sentence including incarceration, parole or supervision, or completed a period of probation ordered by an court; and a resident of this State. Diana Summers Page 4 of 4 Diana Brown Acknowledged for strong analytical and problem solving skills,as well as development of team and client relationships.Recognized for achieving an understanding of numerous different business operations and processes,identifying and quickly elevating potential engagement issues,task prioritizing,and multi-tasking abilities.Enjoys challenging engagements and new opportunities to fiuther develop professional skills.Thrives in a team environment yet also works well independently.Committed to exceeding the needs and expectations of the engagement and client. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Price Waterhouse Coopers,LLC,Dallas Associate,2010-2011 Audited a diverse portfolio of clients including manufacturing,health care,financial,chemical,and holding companies. Part of review team for the issuance of an initial client stock offering Performed 404 SOX Controls testing. Participated on an Advisory and consulting engagement for major financial institution Deloitte and Touche,LLC,Austin Senior Associate,2011—2013 Managed and executed the audits of two companies in the manufacturing and construction fields. Participated on two company segment carve out audits. Performed 404 SOX controls design and operating effectiveness testing. Member of new client acquisition team EDUCATION University of South Carolina Bachelor of Science in Business Administration,2009 Double Majored.Finance and Accounting Directed Studies:French College of Charleston Masters of I ccounting 2010 Study Abrond:University of South Carolina,Maymester Session,Kenya,Africa Studied business tactics and problem solving techniques within the economic and political structure of Kenya.Examined the local operations oC The Coca Cola Company,Dockers,a subsidiary of Levi Strauss and Co.,Kazuri Beads,Ltd.and KickStart,a non-profit dedicated to developing technologies for small-scale enterprises.Studied the importance of eco-tourism to the national economy. National Outdoor Leadership School,Broome,Australia Studied leadership skills and development,while facing extreme conditions of the Australian Outback.Also focused on technical outdoor skills and environmental ethics. OTHEWLE AUERSHIP ACTIVITIES Recipient of the USC Thomas Moore Craig Leadership Award(2008) Recipient ut il,e Student Government Executive Officer Meritorious Award(2009) Student Senator representing Darla Moore School of Business(2007-2009) Chairman For Senate Finance committee(2009) Sorority Comicil President(2008-2009) Omicron I lia 1:.ippa Honors Society President(2009) Mortar Bmrd 1-lonors Society Treasurer(2008) City Of Corpus Christi PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD DETAILS The Planning Commission makesand amendsa master plan forthe SIZE • Seats physical development of the City;to recommend to the City Council approval or disapproval of proposed changes in the zoning plan;to exercise control over platting or subdividing land within the corporate TERM LENGTH 3 Years limitsof the city and within an area extending five miles beyond the Years City limits;to submit annually to the City Manager not lessthan 90 • TERM LIM IT • days prior to the beginning of the budget year a list of recommended capital improvements which in the opinion of the commission are necessary or desirable during the forthcoming five-year period;to require information from other departmentsof the City government in relation to itswork to be responsible to and act asan advisory body to the City Council and to perform such additional duties and exercise such additional powers as may be prescribed by ordinance of the City Council. In addition, members appointed to the Planning Commission are concurrently appointed to the concurrent Beach/Dune Committee (§10-17).This committee reviews applications for master planned development ordinancesfrom applicants seeWng beachfront construction,and submitstheirrecommendations to City Council. They also review the location of the dune protection line and beachfront construction line at least once every five yearsor within 90 days after a tropical storm or hurricane affecting the portion of the coast lying within the City's jurisdiction. COMPOSITION Nine(9) members which shall consist of nine registered voters of the City ■ appointed by the City Council for three-year staggered terms. Members elect a .�� Chair from among its membership at the first regular meeting in August of each ■ year. DETAILS CREATION 1 AUTHORITY City Charter Art. 5,Sec. 1-6.The first Planning Commission ordinance w as adopted in 1937 and has been amended several times,the latest amendment being adopted 7-13-68. Sec. 10-17,Code of Ordinances;Ord.022164,2-28-95. MEETS Every other Wednesday,City Hall,Council Chambers,5:30 p.m. TERM DETAILS Three-year staggered terms. DEPARTMENT Development Services COMMITTEE/SUBCOMMITEE N/A AGENDAS OTHER INFORMATION PLANNING COMMISSION Page 1 of 2 Planning Commission Members Three(3)vacancies with terms to 7-31-19. July 12, 2016 "lli Jeremy Baugh PLANNING COMMISSION Seeking reappointment District 1 Partial 7/31/2016 Member 97% 29/30 meetings Fred Braselton PLANNING COMMISSION Not seeking reappointment District 5 1 7/31/2016 Member Eric Villarreal PLANNING COMMISSION Seeking reappointment District 2 1 7/31/2016 Vice-Chair 90% 27/30 meetings Heidi Hovda PLANNING COMMISSION Active District 2 1 7/31/2017 Member Carl Crull PLANNING COMMISSION Active District 5 1 7/31/2017 Member Marsha Williams PLANNING COMMISSION Active District 3 1 7/31/2017 Member Mike Lippincott PLANNING COMMISSION Active District 4 2 7/31/2018 Member Philip Ramirez PLANNING COMMISSION Active District 4 2 7/31/2018 Chair Frank Hastings PLANNING COMMISSION Active District 5 Partial 7/31/2018 Member Planning Commission Applicants July 12,2016 Boards Applying ForI� Daniel M.Dibble PLANNING COMMISSION District 5 Navy Army Community Credit Union 5725 Spohn Drive Corpus Christi TX 361-986-4517 yes Martin L.Evans PLANNING COMMISSION District 5 Freedom Investment Counsel LLC 101 North Shoreline Blvd.,Ste.560 Corpus Christi TX yes Mark Flores PLANNING COMMISSION District 1 IBEW 278 2301 Saratoga Corpus Christi TX 361-816-9597 yes Keith Heavilin PLANNING COMMISSION District 4 Corpus Christi AutoPlex 6422 South Padre Island Dr. Corpus Christi TX 361-334-7400 yes Jason Page PLANNING COMMISSION District 4 Self Employed 715 S.Tancahua Corpus Christi TX 361-589-9050 yes Morgan Spear PLANNING COMMISSION District 4 Morgan Spear Associates 225 S.Carancahua Corpus Christi TX 361-883-5588 yes Diana Summers PLANNING COMMISSION District 4 Hogan Homes 400 Mann St. Corpus Christi TX 512-994-8786 yes BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FORA CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Jun 14, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Daniel M Dibble Prefix First Name Middle Last Name Initial Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? PLANNING COMMISSION Street Address Suite orApt q= oft City State Postal Code District 5 What district do you live in? lmwmmn� Primary Phone Alternate Phone NavyArmy Community Credit Union Senior Vice President Employer Job Title 5725 Spohn Drive WorkAddress-StreetAddressand Suite Number Corpus Christi WorkAddress-City TX WorkAddress-State 78414 WorkAddress-Zip Code Daniel M Dibble Page 1 of 4 3619864517 ddibble@navyarmyccu.com Work E-mail address Work Address Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: No. Previously served on the Electrical Advisory Board Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) BBA in Finance -Texas Christian University 1992 MBA in Management-Texas A&M Corpus Christi 1999 See Resume Registered Voter? QQ Yes Q No Current resident of the city? QQ Yes O No 32 If yes,how many years? resume_ Navy Army.doc Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Ethnicity Daniel M Dibble Page 2 of 4 Male Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. ® IAgree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. ® IAgree Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. ® IAgree Board-specific questions (if applicable) Daniel M Dibble Page 3 of 4 Question applies to PLANNING COMMISSION. Are you a registered voter of the City of Corpus Christi? QQ Yes O No Daniel M Dibble Page 4 of 4 Daniel M. Dibble on WORK EXPERIENCE: Prosperity Bank- Corpus Christi, TX 2006 - Present Banking Center President- Saratoga Banking Center • Serve as member of Executive Management Team in South Texas Region. • Manage all aspects of banking center operations and lending functions for a banking center with $70 million in total assets. • Maintain direct supervision for two Commercial Loan Officers, two Loan Assistants and one Lobby Manager. Indirectly supervise eight full time equivalent employees which include bank tellers, new account representatives and lending assistants. • Review and approve loan presentations for seven Commercial Loan Officers depending on deal complexity and dollar amount requested. • Directly managed banking centers throughout the South Texas region including Aransas Pass, Carmel, Padre Island, Port Aransas, Airline, Everhart& Northwest locations. Serve as the South Texas Region's local specialist for residential and commercial construction lending as well as real estate development financing. • Trained newly appointed loan officers as well as under performing loan officer to assist them in achieving their performance objectives. • Participated on the due diligence team in conjunction with four different bank acquisitions. Assisted with the transition team on four banking center relocation and branch closing projects. South Texas Home Builders, Inc. — Corpus Christi, TX 2003 — Present President President and founder of the company that specializes in the construction of speculative and custom residential homes with volume of roughly ten units annually. • Manage all aspects of daily operations including overseeing construction management personnel, property acquisition, construction design and contract preparation, property acquisition analysis, financial reporting and preparation, insurance administration and all administrative functions. Rabalais I&E Constructors, Ltd. — Corpus Christi, TX 2004 - 2006 Chief Financial Officer for an electrical contracting company that had 500 employees and is headquartered in Corpus Christi with offices in Dallas and San Antonio. The company's 450 electricians specialize in new commercial construction, industrial plant maintenance, municipal projects, residential and commercial service. • Job functions include managing all financial and administrative functions of the company including financial statement preparation, accounts payable and receivable, insurance and bonding, contract review and identifying cost saving opportunities. • Directly oversee a staff of eight employees. Frost National Bank— Corpus Christi, TX 1995 — 2003 Market President— North Corpus Christi 2002 — 2003 • Serve as member of Executive Management Team in Corpus Christi Region and manage all aspects of banking for the Leopard, Calallen and Portland Financial Centers. • These Financial Centers generated 68% of regional loan growth despite comprising only 25% of the regional balance sheet during 2002. • Maintain direct supervision for six full time employees and indirectly supervise twenty- seven full time equivalent employees. • Formulated financial targets for financial centers and developed strategic plan to achieve goals. Vice President - Commercial Lending 1997- 2002 • Responsible for generating new business for the bank by aggressively calling on prospective customers as well as harnessing existing relationships to improve profitability, which resulted in loan portfolio growth in excess of$35 million over six years. • Designated as a certified contractor and real estate lender which required my approval on loans within these specific industries. • Monitor existing loans to reduce past due ratios and ensure documentation is complete. • Review all consumer loans declined by central credit approval to render final loan decision. • Assist Business Bankers, Relationship Managers in calling efforts and loan underwriting. • Approve wire transfer orders as well as and paying items on over drawn accounts. Vice President— Credit Manager 1995-1997 Managed the Credit Analysis, Loan Documentation and Credit Administration Departments. • My team of two credit analysts was responsible for preparing credit packages for loan presentations, completing loan reviews on existing commercial loans within the portfolio and preparing loan reports for monthly Board of Directors meetings. • The four person Loan Documentation department was responsible for documentation preparation for all consumer and commercial real estate loans. • The four member Credit Administration department was responsible for receiving and posting all loan payments to the operating system, credit and collateral exception tracking and document posting, and Home Mortgage Disclosure Act compliance reporting. EDUCATION: Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi, TX Master of Business Administration —August 1999 Texas Christian University— Fort Worth, TX Bachelor of Business Administration — December 1992 PROFESSIONAL AFFLIATIONS: March of Dimes Corpus Christi— Board Chairman 2002-2004 Walk Chairman 2003 & 2005, Treasurer 2006-2008 & 2013-Present, Board Member 2002-Present, Signature Chefs Dinner Chairman 2010-2012 March of Dimes Texas Chapter - Board of Directors 2002-2003 & 2006-2008, Treasurer 2004-2005 & 2014-2015, Board Member 2002-Present Member - Corpus Christi Builders Association - Board Member 2005-2014 Corpus Christi Country Club— Board of Governors Member 2013-Present Board President 2015-2016 St. Philip the Apostle Catholic Church —Youth Council Chairman 2013-Present Finance Council Member 2014-Present, Stewardship Council Chairman —2010-2013 BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FORA CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Jul 05, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Martin L. Evans Prefix First Name Middle Last Name Initial Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? AIRPORT BOARD, COMMUNITY YOUTH DEVELOPMENT(78415) PROGRAM STEERING COMMITTEE, CORPUS CHRISTI COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION / LOAN REVIEW COMMITTEE, CORPUS CHRISTI REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, CORPUS CHRISTI REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY NUECES COUNTYTAX APPRAISAL DISTRICT, PLANNING COMMISSION, PORT OF CORPUS CHRISTI AUTHORITY OF NUECES COUNTY, TX Street Address Suite orApt City State Postal Code District 5 What district do you live in? lwmmmm� Primary Phone Alternate Phone Freedom Investment Counsel LLC Owner Employer Job Title 101 North Shoreline Blvd, STE 560 WorkAddress-StreetAddressand Suite Number Corpus Christi WorkAddress-City TX WorkAddress-State Martin L. Evans Page 1 of 5 78401 WorkAddress-Zip Code Work Phone Marty@Freedom-ic.com Work E-mail address Home/Primary Address Preferred Mailing lAdress Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: no Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) BS Political Science & History Ed, Texas A&I University Registered Voter? Q Yes 0 No Current resident of the city? Q Yes Q No 50 If yes,how many years? City Board Resume.doc Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Martin L. Evans Page 2 of 5 Unknown Male Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. ® IAgree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. ® IAgree Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. ® IAgree Martin L. Evans Page 3 of 5 Board-specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to CORPUS CHRISTI COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION/LOAN REVIEW COMMITTEE. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? ® Financial Institutions Question applies to CORPUS CHRISTI REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Are you a qualified voter* residing in the Authority? (Note: Authority includes the following services areas: Nueces County and the municipalities, Bishop, Corpus Christi, Driscoll, Gregory, Banquete, Agua Dulce, San Patricio, Port Aransas and Robstown) QQ Yes O No Question applies to CORPUS CHRISTI REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Are you transportation disadvantaged? Q Yes Q No Question applies to NUECES COUNTYTAXAPPRAISAL DISTRICT. Are you a resident and qualified elector* of the District (Nueces County)? QQ Yes O No Question applies to NUECES COUNTYTAXAPPRAISAL DISTRICT. Have you resided in the District for at least 2 years? QQ Yes Q No Martin L. Evans Page 4 of 5 Question applies to PLANNING COMMISSION. Are you a registered voter of the City of Corpus Christi? QQYes No Question applies to PORT OF CORPUS CHRISTIAUTHORITY OF NUECES COUNTY TX. Are you a resident of the Port Authority district and an elector* of Nueces County? QQYes No Question applies to multiple boards. *Qualified elector/voter means a person who is 18 years of age or older; a United States Citizen; has not been determined by a final judgement of a court to be mentally incapacitated; has not been finally convicted of a felony or, if so convicted has fully discharged the person's sentence including incarceration, parole or supervision, or completed a period of probation ordered by an court; and a resident of this State. Question applies to PORT OF CORPUS CHRISTIAUTHORITY OF NUECES COUNTY TX. Have you been a resident of Nueces County for at least 6 months? QQYes No Martin L. Evans Page 5 of 5 MARTIN L. EVANS BACKGROUND: Following college graduation served as a career commissioned officer in the U. S. Army with leadership and management positions in a wide variety of demanding jobs throughout the United States, Europe, the Caribbean, and Central America. Following that, served as Pilot with a regional Part 135 air freight carrier in South Texas. Following that, served as a Financial Advisor and Investment Management Consultant with a major Wall Street Investment Firm. Small business owner in Corpus Christi for past 6 years. PAST POSITIONS & ACTIVITIES RELEVANT TO POSITION BEING SOUGHT: Service Platoon Leader U.S. Army Tank Battalion, Germany Leadership and supervision of 30+ soldiers; Responsible for a fleet of 30 medium trucks, fuel tankers & all terrain ammunition haulers; Logistical support of rations, fuel, supplies and ammunition to an armored tank battalion with 50 heavy tanks and 500+ personnel. Tank Battalion Inteligence Officer, US Army Germany Senior Staff Officer; Information gathering and analysis; Operational planing; Threat analysis; Force protection and operational security; combat readiness training Operations Officer, US Army Garrison, San Juan, Puerto Rico Command VIP breifing officer; Operational plans and training; Helicopter support to multiple military commands and government agencies in Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands; Disastor relief and humanitarian assistance operational support Installation Inspector General, US Army Ft. Sam Houston, Texas Personal advisor to the chief executive officer of a major military installation; Identified, analyzed and developed solutions for systemic problems related to the efficient management of a major military community with an annual operating budget in excess of $20 million. Investigated and reported to the commander on non -criminal complaints and allegations; Provided counseling and assistance on complex personal problems reported by employees and clients; budgeting oversight and internal controls Aviation Operations Staff Officer, US Army South, Panama (Operation Just Cause) Aviation issues briefing officer for Commander US Army South; Aviation operations planning and coordination at senior Army command; planned and participated in nation building operations to remote regions of Panama; Protocol escort officer for Secretary of the Army and U.S. Army Chief of Staff on two separate Command visits Aviation Batalion Executive Officer, US Army Honduras & El Salvador Coordinated downed aircraft and casualty recovery in a combat environment; Provided aviation support for International Election Monitors, El Salvador Nationl Reconciliation Elections 1991; Set up and maintained a remote communications relay network supporting aviation operations in a tropical mountainous region of Central America; Provided helicopter transport for medical teams on medical assistance missions to remote indigenous tribes of Honduras; Provided aviation support to US Embasys El Salvador and Honduras Financial advisor with a global investment firm. SKILLS SUMMARY: Excellent communications, written & verbal Multi level employee supervision experince Strategic planning and policy formulation Preparation and presentation of formal briefings Information analysis and reporting Project development and oversight Budgeting EXPERINCE: May 2009 — Present Financial planning and analysis Training and Teaching Computer and Internet savvy Marketing and sales P & L analysis Registered Principle/Owner — Freedom Investment Counsel LLC Established my own independent financial advisory practice to continue performing duties and responsibilities similar to those performed while employed in the financial services industry described below. Apr 1997- May 2009 Financial Advisor & Investment Management Consultant UBS PaineWebber, Corpus Christi, TX Developed new client relationships. Serviced clients in the areas of personal financial plans, employer sponsored retirement plans, securities and insurance sales. Supervised customer service and support staff. Achieved advanced professional designation as an Investment Management Consultant. Developed and maintained a personal business plan. Managed investment strategies in over 200 client relationships working to educate and assist clients in the investment decision making process. Daily activities include financial planning, investment performance analysis, marketing plan implementation, substantial client contact and frequent coordination with outside vendors or product managers. Assisted with new employee selection and training. Grew capital responsibility and personal production for six consecutive years. Current capital responsibility $30,000,000+. Trailing 12 month production $215,000. Awarded special corporate recognition in 1998 for qualifying in the top 10% of peer group for new accounts and new assets under management. Nov 1995 -Apr 1997 Account Executive, Dean Witter, Corpus Christi, TX New client development, securities sales and marketing. (See above) Jul 1994 -Jan 1997 Air Carrier Pilot, Part 135 Operations, Aero Pak, San Antonio, TX Pilot for an overnight air freight operator. Aug 1991 -Jul 1994 Aviation Division Chief, Fifth U.S. Army, Ft. Sam Houston, TX Supervised a 5 -person management evaluation team validating aviation organization's training, safety, standardization and maintenance programs in an eight -state area. Inspected compliance with established regulations and policies. Insured internal controls and budget expenditure reporting procedures. Participated in formulation of policy and operational plans. Provided oversight and inspection Jan 1991 -Aug 1991 Executive Officer, 4th BN 228th Aviation Regt., Soto Cano AB, Honduras Supervised a management team responsible for aviation operations in 5 Central American countries with 30 helicopters and 300 employees. Developed a goal oriented aviation maintenance management program, improving aircraft availability rates by over 10% allowing increased operating tempo. Developed and implemented organizational structure changes to enhance aviation support in Central America. Jan 1990 -Jan 1991 Aviation Operations Officer, U.S. Army South, Ft. Clayton, Panama Provided staff oversight and support of aviation operations for a major military headquarters during and after Operation Just Cause. Organized and conducted frequent formal decision briefings and informative presentations for senior executive leadership and high level political and government leaders. Selected principal escort officer for Secretary of the Army and U.S. Army Chief of Staff on two separate command visits. Utilized persuasive skills in the corporate decision process. Feb 1986 -Jan 1990 Inspector General, Headquarters USAG, Ft. Sam Houston, TX Personal advisor to the chief executive officer of a major military installation. Responsible for formulation and interpretation of policies and regulations. Established a systematic inspection program to insure compliance with prescribed operating procedures. Received, evaluated and recommended action on special issues raised by employees and customers. Identified, analyzed and developed solutions for systemic problems related to the efficient management of a major military community with an annual budget in excess of $20 million. Supervised 5 staff specialists. Computer skills and other Qualifications: Microsoft Office Suite Windows NT MS Word MS Excel Group one life & annuity insurance license Education: NASD Series 7 Series 63 ACT Contact Management data base MS PowerPoint Series 65 Series 31 Investment Management Consultant Internet savvy Graduated Calallen Highschool 1969, BS in Political Science & History ED, Texas A & I University, Distinguished Military Graduate; Army Command and General Staff College (graduate level). Investment Management Consultant program UBS PaineWebber. BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FORA CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Mar 10, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Mark Flores Prefix First Name Middle Initial Email Address Last Name Which Boards would you like to apply for? CORPUS CHRISTI REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ELECTRICALADVISORY BOARD, PLANNING COMMISSION Street Address Suite orApt City State Postal Code District 1 What district do you live in? INW11111•11 Primary Phone Alternate Phone IBEW 278 ASST. BUSINESS MANAGER Employer Job Title 2301 SARATOGA WorkAddress- Street Address and Suite Number CORPUS CHRISTI WorkAddress - City TX WorkAddress - State 78417 WorkAddress- Zip Code Mark Flores Page 1 of 5 361-816-9597 Work Phone Work E-mail address Work Address Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: NO Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) (1980-1984) TEXAS GULF COAST ELECTRICALJOINTAPPRENTSHIP PROGRAM AND TRAINING PROGRAM. 34 YEARS ELECTRICAL EXPERIENCE Registered Voter? OYes ONo Current resident of the city? Yes No 39 If yes, how many years? FLORES.pdf Upload a Resume FLORES.pdf Plea upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Hispanic Mark Flores Page 2 of 5 Male Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. Z IAgree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. ® !Agree Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. Z !Agree Board -specific questions (if applicable) Mark Flores Page 3 of 5 Question applies to CORPUS CHRISTI REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Are you a qualified voter* residing in the Authority? (Note: Authority includes the following services areas: Nueces County and the municipalities, Bishop, Corpus Christi, Driscoll, Gregory, Banquete, Agua Dulce, San Patricio, Port Aransas and Robstown) QQYes No Question applies to CORPUS CHRISTI REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Are you transportation disadvantaged? QYes No Question applies to ELECTRICAL ADVISORY BOARD. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * ® Journeyman Electrician (minimum five years' experience) Question applies to PLANNING COMMISSION. Are you a registered voter of the City of Corpus Christi? QQ Yes Q No Question applies to multiple boards. *Qualified elector/voter means a person who is 18 years of age or older; a United States Citizen; has not been determined by a final judgement of a court to be mentally incapacitated; has not been finally convicted of a felony or, if so convicted has fully discharged the person's sentence including incarceration, parole or supervision, or completed a period of probation ordered by an court; and a resident of this State. Mark Flores Page 4 of 5 STATE OF TEXAS MARK A FLORES JOURNEYMAN ELECTRICIAN LICENSE NUMBER 24503 EXPIRS 05/25/2015 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATION BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FORA CITY BOARD, Submit Date: May 23, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Keith Heavilin Prefix First Name Middle Initial Email Address Last Name Which Boards would you like to apply for? PLANNING COMMISSION Street Address Suite orApt 1011111111 City State Postal Code District 4 What district do you live in? 1111111111111.111111111 111•111.1•11111 Primary Phone Alternate Phone Corpus Christi AutoPlex General Mana.er Employer 6422 SPID WorkAddress- Street Address and Suite Number Corpus Christi WorkAddress - City TX WorkAddress - State 78418 WorkAddress- Zip Code Job Title Keith Heavilin Page 1 of 4 3613347400 keith@ccautoplex.com Work E-mail address Home/PrimaryAddress Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Registered Voter? QQYes No Current resident of the city? QQ Yes Q No 1 If yes, how many years? Keith _Heavilin _Resume _2016.docx Upload a Resume Plea upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Keith Heavilin Page 2 of 4 Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. Z IAgree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. ® !Agree Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. Z IAgree Board -specific questions (if applicable) Keith Heavilin Page 3 of 4 Question applies to PLANNING COMMISSION. Are you a registered voter of the City of Corpus Christi? QQYes No Keith Heavilin Page 4 of 4 Keith Heavilin WORK EXPERIENCE General Manager CC AutoPlex, Corpus Christi, TX April 2016 -Present • Oversee all operations of a start-up buy -here -pay -here car dealership, related finance company, and service shop • Responsible for establishing and implementing all processes and procedures to insure a profitable and compliant dealership and finance company. • Responsible for vehicle procurement, sales and collection operations and all accounting and financials. General Manager Smart Auto Inc., Knoxville, TN June 2010- May 2015 • Oversaw all operations of bicoastal, $38 million portfolio buy -here -pay -here car dealership, related finance company, and service shops • Directly managed 15 key managers including Sales, Service, Finance, General Counsel, Business Development, and Dealer Support personnel • Responsible for growing portfolio by 30% in 5 year tenure as General Manager Supported four full-service car dealership locations, hired key managers, developed and executed successful operational policies and procedures in all departments • Continually identified areas of improvement throughout the organization, developed strategic plan for improvement, managed process until goal metrics were reached Service Manager Smart Auto Inc., Knoxville, TN January 2010 • Changed parts ordering process to save $250,000 per year per location • Established Asset Management performance metrics and buying guides for buyers in all locations • Streamlined reconditioning process of assets to reduce cost by $250 per unit • Exceeded all established performance goals while reducing overhead and employee headcount Customer Relationship Manager/Underwriter Smart Auto Inc., Knoxville, TN August 2009 • Responsible for daily, weekly, and monthly collection goals including: cash collected, delinquency, repossessions, and charge offs. • Performed all underwriting of vehicle loans on site to buy from related sales company • Maintained relationships with customers throughout life of auto loan ensuring timely payments to the finance company SKILLS EDUCATION • Proficient manager of teams and individuals • Highly adaptable to new and changing conditions • Expert at finding bad/inefficient processes and procedures and implementing corrections for efficiency and profitability • Expert user of FEXDMS, Dialing Systems, Accurint, GPS Tracking Systems University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FORA CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Mar 09, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Jason Page Prefix First Name Middle Last Name Initial Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? PLANNING COMMISSION Street Address Suite orApt 1011111111 City State Postal Code District 4 What district do you live in? 1111111111111.111111111 111•111.1•11111 Primary Phone Alternate Phone Self Employed Employer 715 S Tancahua WorkAddress- Street Address and Suite Number Corpus Christi WorkAddress - City TX WorkAddress - State 78401 WorkAddress- Zip Code Owner / Principal Job Title Jason Page Page 1 of 4 3615899050 jasondavidpage@gmail.com Work E-mail address Home/PrimaryAddress Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: I do not currently serve on any other board, commission, or committee Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Registered Voter? QQYes No Current resident of the city? QQ Yes Q No 32 If yes, how many years? Jason_Page_Resume.pdf Upload a Resume Plea upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Ethnicity Jason Page Page 2 of 4 Male Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. Z IAgree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. ® !Agree Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. Z !Agree Board -specific questions (if applicable) Jason Page Page 3 of 4 Question applies to PLANNING COMMISSION. Are you a registered voter of the City of Corpus Christi? QQYes No Jason Page Page 4 of 4 JASON PAGE SUMMARY Freelance photographer with experience in digital and film, as well as medium format photography. Available 24 hours a day. Specialty equipment can typically be ordered in overnight for time critical projects. Currently searching for architects, commercial builders, industrial builders and Realtors who are interested in upping their marketing game with quality photography Experienced: Photojournalism, Events, Weddings, Portraiture, Corporate Identity & Headshots, Real Estate, Product & Food, Commercial Promotional EXPERIENCE JASON PAGE FREELANCE PHOTOGRAPHER 03 / 2010 - Present Owner, Principal I am the principal photographer and am responsible for the day-to-day operations as well as marketing and customer satisfaction. I have built up one of the best-known names for wedding photography in the South Texas area, and pride myself on handmade images, limited bookings and one-on-one client contact. I also have become the leader in Real Estate photographer for several local agencies and top agents in the Corpus Christi metro area, and provide these agents with superb images to help market their listings more effectively, while reducing the initial listing workload. HOEGEMEYER'S BARBEQUE BARN 01 / 2013 - Present Business Development Responsible for the ongoing acquisition and cultivation of new customers and ongoing clients. Created long range forecasts based on current and past sales data and targeted marketing efforts to help secure these goals. Used multiple paths of marketing to brand business as a destination for barbeque in the Coastal Bend. SOUTHERN TECHNICAL CONTROL 03 / 2012 - Present Inventory & Production Management Consultant I currently consult with the company management regarding their Inventory and Production. Inventory Management - I have developed a best practices workflow and worked with the employees responsible for purchasing and inventory to better their skills at tracking inventory as it is ordered, entered into their system, and sent out. I have also worked on streamlining their accounting system to remove duplicate inventory items and create items that didn't exist. Production Management - I have worked with the management to implement a series of methods for tracking production, both in the product manufacturing and field service aspects of the business. I have implemented various in-house databases to help the company keep track of their current and past production SOUTHERN TECHNICAL CONTROL 10 / 2008 - 03 / 2010 Purchasing Manager Handled inventory levels, bought and sold obsolete and used parts, part repairs, sourced parts for 20+ field service personnel, billed parts used on various projects as well as estimated parts to be used on projects. NUECES STONE QUARRY 10/ 2006 - 01 / 2008 Manager Managed all aspects of the business including inventory, product sourcing, commercial and residential accounts, employees and bookkeeping. EDUCATION TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY -CORPUS CHRISTI None , GIS / Geomatics GIS / Geomatics Club Research Assistant on Aerial Imaging System RICHARD KING HIGH SCHOOL High School Diploma German Club Student Council Senior Council Academic Decathlon CISCO / CCNA Training HONORS Eagle Scout Award CERTIFICATIONS OFFSHORE WATER SURVIVAL HUET Falck Safety Services (US) SAFELANDUSA PEC Safety • License: PEC100474939 SAFEGULF PEC Safety • License: PEC100474939 TWIC Transportation Security Administration (TSA) • German • English LANGUAGES PUBLICATIONS 2002 - 2006 1998 - 2002 02 / 2014 02 / 2014 02 / 2014 12 / 2015 - 12 / 2020 THE BEND MAGAZINE Gemstone Media, LLC / Jordan Regas Authors: Jason http://issuu. com/thebendmag/docs/tb_06_ 14_online/5?e =11308897/8089670 This was a very last minute shoot that I couldn't refuse. When else can I invite Roger Creager t 06/ 2014 Page • o visit our famil)s barbeque place AND get to photograph him with his dad? I said yes immediately! We photographed enjoying an ice cold beer and having a good of time. Then we got a few posed and natural / candid them against some 200 year old doors and a 60 year old hut with the Texas flag painted on the side. THE ONE BRIDE GUIDE McCleod Creative Authors: Jason http://www.theonebrideguide.com/magazine/Vol7_Issue2/TheOne_Vol7Issue2 Final_web.pdf Roger and his dad shots of the two of 06/ 2014 Page • I had the pleasure of coming up with a session with one of my brides to help tie in The One's issue theme, "A Pop of Color". I wanted to literally bring that pop to the cover by including brightly colored, 24" balloons. Natural makeup was provided by Kayla Alvarez and hair was done by Shear Illusions. ZOMBSHELLS!!! 2013 ZOMBIE CALENDAR 10/ 2012 Self Published • Authors: Jason Page • http://photosjasondavidpage.com/zombshells This collaborative effort features eleven zombie models and even includes a centerfold. Photography, Design & Layout by Jason Page, Makeup & Hairstyling by Ashle Riff, Lead Model Amanda Ramirez (aka Mandi Mayhem). Each calendar is 9x12 printed on glossy paper and includes a single hang -hole. SOUTH TEXAS WEDDINGS MAGAZINE 07/2011 STWM - July 2011 • Authors: Jason Page, Joanne Klein For this issue of the South Texas Weddings Magazine, I performed the issue's multipage layout and creative design. I also was responsible for the cover photography. BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FORA CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Jul 05, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Pref x Email Address Morgan First Name Middle Initial Spear Lag Name 3.Attex Which Boards would you like to apply for? CORPUS CHRISTI REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, PLANNING COMMISSION, PORT OF CORPUS CHRISTI AUTHORITY OF NUECES COUNTY, TX Street Address District 4 What distnct do you live in' Primary Phone Alternate Phone MORGAN SPEAR ASSOCIATES PRESIDENT Employer Jot: T 225 S. CARANCAHUA Work Address- Street Address and Sude Number CORPUS CHRISTI WorkAddress- City TX WorkAddress - Slate 78401 WorkAddress - Zip Code Suite or Apt WI" S 13te Postal Code Morgan Spear Page 1 of 5 361-883-5588 Work Phone Work E-mail address Work Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: NO Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) FORMERLY SERVED ON THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BACHELOR OF ARCHITECTURE DEGREE FROM UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS IN AUSTIN 1957 LICENSED TO PRACTICE ARCHITECTURE IN THE STATE OF TEXAS JANUARY 1962 MEMBER OF NATIONAL COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTURE REGISTERED BOARDS 1984 MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS MEMBER OF TEXAS SOCIETY OF ARCHITECTS BOARD MEMBER OF HOUSE COMMITTEE AT CORPUS CHRISTI COUNTRY CLUB BOARD MEMBER OF CENTENNIAL HERITAGE HOUSE BOARD MEMBER OF HARBOR PLAY HOUSE LITTLE THEATER CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF PALMER DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM (PDAP) Registered Voter? pYes No Current resident of the city? Q Yes 0 No 56 If yes, how many years? Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Morgan Spear Page 2 of 5 Demographics Caucasian/Non-Hispanic ity r r Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. ® lAgree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. ® lAgree Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. ® lAgree Morgan Spear Page 3 of 5 Board -specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to PLANNING COMMISSION. Are you a registered voter of the City of Corpus Christi? • Yes 0 N Question applies to PORT OF CORPUS CHRISTI AUTHORITY OF NUECES COUNTY TX. Are you a resident of the Port Authority district and an elector* of Nueces County? • Yes 0 N Question applies to multiple boards. *Qualified elector/voter means a person who is 18 years of age or older; a United States Citizen; has not been determined by a final judgement of a court to be mentally incapacitated; has not been finally convicted of a felony or, if so convicted has fully discharged the person's sentence including incarceration, parole or supervision, or completed a period of probation ordered by an court; and a resident of this State. Quest. applie to POR 1 OF CORPUS CHRISTI AUTHORITY OF NUECES COUNTY TX. Have you been a resident of Nueces County for at least 6 months? p Yes Q No Morgan Spear Page 4 of 5 BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FORA CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Jul 05, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Diana Summers Prefix First Name Middle Initial Email Address Last Name Which Boards would you like to apply for? CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, CORPUS CHRISTI REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, PLANNING COMMISSION Street Address Suit, City District 4 What district do you live in? is.101111.1.1 Primary Phone Alternate Phone HOGAN HOMES CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER Employer Job Title 400 MANN ST WorkAddress- Street Address and Suite Number CORPUS CHRISTI WorkAddress - City WorkAddress - State 78401 WorkAddress- Zip Code Postal Code Diana Summers Page 1 of 4 512-994-8786 Work Phone Work E-mail address Home/PrimaryAddress Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: NO Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) SEE ATTACHED RESUME BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, DOUBLE MAJORED IN FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING FROM UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 2009 MASTERS OF ACCOUNTING FROM COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON, 2010 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: PRICE WATERHOUSE COOPERS, LLC, DALLAS: AUDITASSOCIATE 2010-2011; DELOITTE AND TOUCHE, LLC, AUSTIN: AUDIT SENIOR ASSOCIATE 2011-2013; HOGAN HOMES, ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT 2013 -PRESENT MEMBER OF CORPUS CHRISTI ROTARY CLUB Registered Voter? QYes No Current resident of the city? Q Yes No 4 If yes, how many years? BROWN.pdf Upload a Resume Plea upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Diana Summers Page 2 of 4 Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Ethnicity Gender Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. (Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. ® (Agree Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. ® (Agree Diana Summers Page 3 of 4 Board -specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESSAND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. Are you a qualified elector* of the City? QQYes No Question applies to PLANNING COMMISSION. Are you a registered voter of the City of Corpus Christi? QQ Yes Q No Question applies to multiple boards. *Qualified elector/voter means a person who is 18 years of age or older; a United States Citizen; has not been determined by a final judgement of a court to be mentally incapacitated; has not been finally convicted of a felony or, if so convicted has fully discharged the person's sentence including incarceration, parole or supervision, or completed a period of probation ordered by an court; and a resident of this State. Diana Summers Page 4 of 4 Diana Brown Acknowledged for strong analytical and problem salving skills, as well as development of team and client relationships. Recognized for achieving an understanding of numerous different business operations and processes, identifying and quickly elevating potential engagement issues, task prioritizing, and multi -tasking abilities. Enjoys challenging engagements and new opportunities to further develop professional skills. Thrives in a team environment yet also works well independently. Committed to exceeding the needs and expectations of the engagement and client. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Price Waterhouse Coopers, LLC, Dallas Associate, 2010 - 2011 Audited a diverse portfolio of clients including manufacturing, health care, financial, chemical, and holding companies. Part of review team for the issuance of an initial client stock offering Performed 404 SOX Controls testing. Participated on an Advisory and consulting engagement for major financial institution Deloitte and Touche, LLC, Austin Senior Associate, 2011— 2013 Managed and executed the audits of two companies in the manufacturing and construction fields. Participated on two company segment carve out audits. Performed 404 SOX controls design and operating effectiveness testing. Member of new client acquisition team EDUCATION University of South Carolina Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, 2009 Double Majored: Finance and Accounting Directed Studies: French College of Charleston Masters of $crounting 2010 Study Abroad: University of South Carolina, Maymester Session, Kenya, Africa Studied business tactics and problem solving techniques within the economic and political structure of Kenya. Examined the local operations of The Coca Cola Company, Dockers, a subsidiary of Levi Strauss and Co., Kazuri Beads, Ltd. and KickStart, a non-profit dedicated to developing technologies for small-scale enterprises. Studied the importance of eco -tourism to the national economy. National Outdoor Leadership School, Broome, Australia Studied leadership skills and development, while facing extreme conditions of the Australian Outback. Also focused on technical outdoor skills and environmental ethics. OTHER/LEADERSHIP ACTIVITIES Recipient of the USC Thomas Moore Craig Leadership Award (2008) Recipient of the Student Government Executive Officer Meritorious Award (2009) Student Senator representing Darla Moore School of Business (2007 - 2009) Chairman for Senate Finance committee (2009) Sorority Coo i n c i l President (2008 - 2009) Omicron 1 '1.1 Kappa Honors Society President (2009) Mortar Board Honors Society Treasurer (2008) AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of June 21, 2016 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 DATE: June 1, 2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, Acting City Manager FROM: Belinda Mercado, Director of Information Technology Bmercado@cctexas.com (361) 826-3740 CenturyLink Communications, LLC renewal of Conduit Use Agreement for telecommunications CAPTION: Ordinance authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a ten-year Conduit Use Agreement with CenturyLink Communications, L.L.C., to install and maintain telecommunications facilities within city conduit located in Ocean Drive right-of-way between Ennis Joslin Road and Sand Dollar Blvd. in consideration of $7,886.00 annual revenue payment, to be increased by 4% annually. PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to permit CenturyLink, LLC to continue use of City -owned conduit for telecommunication purposes. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: City Council authorized in 1999, 2005, and 2011 five-year conduit use agreements with CenturyLink Communications, LLC (original agreement with KMC Telecom prior to CenturyLink acquisition). The agreement has been re -negotiated to increase the term from five years to ten years and includes an annual 4% increase per year in revenue that was not a part of the original agreement. The City has a four -inch diameter conduit located on Ocean Drive between Ennis Joslin and Sand Dollar Drive. The total length of the conduit is 4,868 feet and provides for annual revenue of $1.62 per foot/year. CenturyLink Communications, LLC desires to continue same use for telecommunication services. Revenue for this conduit use agreement is placed in the General Fund. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the Agreement. 2. Do not approve the Agreement. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This action conforms to the City's policies and procedures and Texas State procurement laws. EMERGENCY/NON-EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Information Technology Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Operating X Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015-2016 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): General Fund 1020 Comments: This revenue is posted to the General Fund as a Telecommunications Fee. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this agenda item. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance - CenturyLink Conduit Use Agreement Agreement - CenturyLink Conduit Use Agreement Form 1295 - CenturyLink Ordinance authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a ten year conduit use agreement with Centurylink Communications, L.L.C., to install and maintain telecommunications facilities within city conduit located in Ocean Drive right-of-way between Ennis Joslin Road and Sand Dollar Blvd. in consideration of $7,886.00 annual payment, to be increased by 4% annually. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute a ten year conduit use agreement with CenturyLink Communications, L.L.C. to install, operate and maintain telecommunications facilities within approximately 4,800 feet of City conduit located on Ocean Drive right-of-way between Ennis Joslin Road and Sand Dollar Boulevard in consideration of annual payment of $1.62 per foot/year for total annual payment of $7,886.00, to be increased by 4% annually. A copy of the agreement is on file with the City Secretary. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2016, by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Rudy Garza Michael Hunter Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Brian Rosas Lucy Rubio Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughn That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2016,by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Rudy Garza Michael Hunter Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Brian Rosas Lucy Rubio Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughn PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2016. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor Page 1 of 14 CONDUIT USE AGREEMENT This Conduit Use Agreement ("The Agreement") is executed as of the day of 2015, between CenturyLink Communications, LLC, a limited liability holding company wholly owned by CenturyLink ("CENTURYLINK), and the City of Corpus Christi, Texas ("City"), a Texas home rule municipal corporation WITNESSETH WHEREAS in August 1999. the City and KMC Telecom Inc. ("KMC") executed a five-year Conduit Use Agreement regarding KMC use of City conduit; VVHEREA8, as of June 30, 2005. CENTURYLINK acquired KMC assets and entered into a five-year Conduit Use Agreement on August 30, 2005; WHEREAS, on June 28, 2011, the City and CenturyLink executed a new five-year Conduit Use Agreement; WHEREAS, the City is willing to continue to permit, under certain conditions set forth herein, the use by CENTURYLINK of certain City -owned conduit for placement of its telecommunications facilities NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions herein contained, the parties do hereby mutually covenant and agree as follows: Section 1. Description of the City Conduit. A conduit four inches in diameter, approximately 4,868 feet in |ength, presently containing six handholes, located on Ocean Drive between Ennis Joo||n Road and Sand Dollar Oriva, as depicted on Exhibit A to this Agreement, which exhibit is fully incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. Use of the Citv Conduit. The City shall designate for CENTURYLINK exclusive use One of the three inner ducts within the City Conduit. CENTURYL1NKshall have unrestricted ingress and egress to its designated inner duct, through the handholes depicted in Exhibit A, for purposes of instaUing, openating, nnmintaining, and repairing its telecommunications facilities. |nataUedion, oponaUon, maintenance and repair of CENTURYLINK telecommunication facilities within the City public way shaU be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and its exhibitm, which are fully incorporated herein by reference. Section 3. City Use of the City Conduit. The City shall have the exclusive use of the remaining two inner ducts located within City Conduit. Section 4. Compensation to City for Use of Citv Conduit. As compensation for first year of this Agreement, CENTURYLINK shall pay the City $1.O2/footo[City Conduit, for total o[$7.880.O0 Thereafter, the annual compensation shall be increased by 4% for each year of this agreement. The first payment shall be submitted within thirty days of the final approval of this Agreement by City Council. Thereafter, CENTURYLINK shall issue payment by October 1 of each year to City of Corpus Chrioti, Attention Collection Oapartnnent, P. O. Box 9277, Corpus Chrieh, Texas 78469'8277. All payments should reference Conduit LJse AgreemenL Section 5. Issuance of Permits. CENTURYLINK must comply with City ordinances and codes to receive all necessary City of Corpus Christi permits prior to conshucdon, maintenanco, and repair of its telecommunications facilities placed in the City Conduit. Section 6. Term. The term o[Lh|s Agreement shall be for ten yeora. to commence upon June 28.2O18subject tothe passage and approval by th City Council. Page 2of14 Section 7. INDEMNIFICATION. CENTURYLINK shall indemnify, defend and save harmless the City, its mayor and council members, appointed boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees, attorneys and insurance carriers, individually and collectively, from all losses, claims, suits, demands, expenses, subrogations, attorneys' fees or actions of any kind and nature resulting from personal injury to any person, including employees of CENTURYLINK or of any contractor or subcontractor employed by CENTURYLINK (including bodily injury and death) or damages to any property, arising or alleged to have arisen out of the acts of CENTURYLINK its contractors, subcontractors, officers, agents and employees while exercising any of the rights or privileges granted by this Conduit Use Agreement. The amount and type of insurance coverage requirements set forth herein will in no way be construed as limiting the scope of indemnity in this paragraph. CENTURYLINK further agrees and shall have the right to appear, defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City in any action, claim or suit challenging the grant of or any of the rights conferred upon CENTURYLINK by this Conduit Use Agreement. Section 8. Insurance. CENTURYLINK must acquire and maintain insurance as set forth in attached exhibit. Section 9. Street Closure. CENTURYLINK must not close or barricade a public street, or any portion of the public street, to install, repair, or maintain its telecommunication facilities located within the City Conduit until CENTURYLINK or its contractor has received approval of its traffic control plan from City's Traffic Engineering Office. Section 10. CENTURYLINK must submit a set of construction drawings to the City Engineer for any proposed work at least two weeks prior to onset of construction. The drawings must show the depth and location of the proposed construction and distance from the existing water, stormwater, wastewater, gas, fiber and communication lines. Section 11. CENTURYLINK must verify depth and location of existing Water, Wastewater, Gas, fiber, communication lines, as well as other users of the rights of way, including AEP, and Southwestern Bell Telephone lines, as well as Espire, CSW, and CAPROCK communication fiber optic cables. Prior to the start of any excavation, CENTURYLINK must call the Texas One Call System (1-800-245-4545), 1-800-DIG-TESS and Lone Star Notification Center (1-800-669- 8344) or other locator service designated by the City Director of Capital Programs, or designee. Section 12. CENTURYLINK must not begin work without 24 hours prior notice to the AEP, City Water, Gas, Wastewater Divisions. Section 13. CENTURYLINK must properly tamp backfill around existing utilities in accordance with the City of Corpus Christi Standard Specifications, including City Water Distribution System Standards. Section 14. If damage arising out of or connected with the installation, operation, repair or maintenance of CENTURYLINK. telecommunications facilities or inner ducts occurs to any gas, storm, water, wastewater , fiber, or communication line, as determined by the City's representative, a City crew will be brought in and allowed immediately to make all repairs. Except for emergency repairs, City shall make a reasonable effort to contact CENTURYLINK's representative at 800 778-0949 so that CENTURYLINK has an opportunity to have a representative present during operations. All of the City's costs (labor and materials) associated with the repairs must be paid by CENTURYLINK within 30 days of the City Manager's itemized C:\Users\arb9100\Documents\Corpus Christi conduit lease\CenturyLink conduit agreement with Corpus Christi FINAL 4.27. 16.docx Contract # COND TX 189946 CL Page 3 of 14 invoice thereof. City's representative will determine the extent of damage and amount of repairs to the utility line(s). Section 15. Work around any existing water main must be done under the inspection of a Water Division Inspector at a daily rate of $286.80 for each day spent inspecting construction, maintenance, repair, replacement or relocation of the City Conduit pursuant hereto. A half-day (4 hours) or more of work constitutes a whole working day for purpose of calculation. Any time in excess of 8 hours a day, or on Saturday, Sunday or Holidays, must be calculated at a daily rate of $53.77 an hour. Owner must pay these funds to the City of Corpus Christi, Water Department. These amounts will be adjusted annually on October 1 to reflect any pay increase. Section 16. CENTURYLINK must take every precaution not to disturb the soil surrounding any existing water or wastewater line, including all thrust blocks. Section 17. Damages to driveways, culverts, head walls and any other structure, public or private, caused by CENTURYLINK, must be repaired by CENTURYLINK at its expense within 30 days after being notified of damage to the same. Section 18. CENTURYLINK must not store or leave any equipment or material in City public way overnight. Section 19. CENTURYLINK must notify Street Superintendent (361- 857-1940) 24 hours prior to starting work, and must have a representative present during backfilling and pavement repairs. CENTURYLINK must also notify City Municipal Information Systems Technician III at (361) 857-1956 24 hours prior to starting work. Section 20. CENTURYLINK must provide proper safety and security devices to prevent possible injuries or accidents. No open trenches or pits are to be left ovemight. All trenches must be backfilled promptly, the backfill properly compacted, surface restored, and the work done in a neat and workmanlike manner. Section 21. CENTURYLINK must comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations, as may be amended. Interpretation of this Agreement and the rights and duties created hereunder shall be pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the State of Texas and the Charter and ordinances of the City. Section 22. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall extend to and bind the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. Section 23. CENTURYLINK shall not be excused from complying with any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement by any failure of the City on one or more occasions to enforce compliance with such terms and conditions. Section 24. Assignment. Neither party shall have the right to assign this Agreement in whole or in part without the written consent of the other party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Section 25. Notice. Any notices required or provided in the administration of this Agreement shall be addressed, sent by overnight delivery or certified mail, as follows: If to the City: City of Corpus Christi C:\Users\arb9100\Documents\Corpus Christi conduit lease\CenturyLink conduit agreement with Corpus Christi FINAL 4.27.16.docx Contract # COND TX 189946 CL Page 4 of 14 1201 Leopard Street P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469 Attn: City Manager If to CENTURYLINK: CENTURYLINK Attn: Real Estate Transactions 600 New Century New Century, KS 66031 With a copy to: CenturyLink Law Department 1801 California Street Denver, CO 80202 Attn: Network Legal Group Section 26. Modifications. All terms and conditions of this Agreement are contained herein and any modifications shall be in writing and approved by ordinance except as otherwise expressly provided herein. Section 27. Preemption. No provision of this Agreement shall be deemed void or unenforceable as a result of state or federal preemption unless and until so determined by a final, non -appealable order of a state or federal agency or court. Section 28. Publication. CENTURYLINK shall pay all costs of publication of notice as required by the City Charter. Section 29. Disclosure of Interest. CENTURYLINK agrees to comply with City of Corpus Christi Ordinance No. 17112 and complete the Disclosure of interests form as part of this contract. Section 30. Certificate of Interested Parties. CENTURYLINK agrees to comply with Texas Government Code section 2252.908 and complete Form 1295 Certificate of Interested Parties as part of this contract, if required. For more information, please review the information on the Texas Ethics Commission website at https:t/www.ethics.state.tx.us. Section 31. Conflict of Interest. CENTURYLINK agrees to comply with Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Govemment Code and file Form CIQ with the City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office, if required. For more information and to determine if Form CIQ is required, information on the City Secretary's website is provided at http://www. cctexas. com/govern ment/city-secretary/conflict-disclosure/index. C:\Users\arb9100\Documents\Carpus Christi conduit lease\CenturyLink conduit agreement with Corpus Christi FINAL, 4.27.16.docx Contract 4 COND TX 189946 CL IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties duly authorized representatives as of the ATTEST'. Page 5 of 14 have caused this Agreement to be executed by their date first abov- • ' t - CEN IR ilk 6 By: ilk . At. 1 WV :itA411-- .,t-r. Nam w LaRae Dodson Title: VP, Real Estate & Fleet STATE OF 0-01C"'ll COUNTY OF 1..-2; Inver" This, ,inSrurrRilt was acknowledged before me on this 41 day of the V 4<- k.Lka--e CA4-C of CENTURYLINK on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public, State of L.A.-1/0 61 -CA). ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta, City Secretary THE CITY OF CORPU , 2016, by .KLE K.TALLEY NOTARY Miele S CHR m Aire OFCOLORADO y ID 20064031203 MY OtNSS$0N ExPof,s SEPTEMBERS, 2016 Approved as to form: ,\"1 -4 -4* --1- , 2016 By: -Y-44.1 Lisa Aguilar, Assis t City Attorney For the City Attorney CAL1sers\arb91001Documents\Corpus Christi conduit leaselCenturyLink conduit agreement with Corpus Christi FINAL 4.27.16.docx Contract # COND TX _189946_Ct, Page 6 of 14 CONDUIT DIAGRAM C:\Users\arb9100\Documents\Corpus Christi conduit lease\CcnturyL.ink conduit agreement with Corpus Christi FINAL 4.27.16.docx Contract # COND TX 189946 CL Island Blvd. ' San Dollar Blvd. l° • r+ Bridge lapel Q S,; m�rir,i.rr f Pd l Exhibit " A " Map Nat to $c*h 6 i 5 Team AM•z$111-194 Page 7of14 EXHIBIT B INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS I. CENTURYLINK'S LIABILITY INSURANCE A. CenturyLink must not commence work under this contract until all insurance required has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. CenturyLink must not allow any subcontractor, to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. B. CenturyLink must make available to the City's Risk Manager and Director of Engineering proof of insurance showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) with an A.M. Bests rating of A -VII or better and authorized to do business in the state where the conduit is located. The City must be included as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies and a waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Evidence of CenturyLink's insurance is available at www.centurylink.com/moi. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises -- Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non -Owned 3. Rented/Leased $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit WORKERS'S COMPENSATION (All States Endorsement if Company is not domiciled in Texas) Statutory and complies with Part H of this Exhibit. C:\Users\arh9100\Documents\Corpus Christi conduit lease\Century[.ink conduit agreement with Corpus Christi FINAL 4.27.16.docx Contract # CON[) TX 189946 CL, Page 8 of 14 Employer's Liability $500,000/$500,000/$500,000 C. In the event of accidents of any kind related to this contract, CenturyLink must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. II. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Applicable for paid employees, CenturyLink must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers' compensation coverage provided must be in statutory amounts according to the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation. An All States Endorsement shall be required if CenturyLink is not domiciled in the State of Texas. CenturyLink shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at CenturyLink's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. C. CenturyLink shall be required to make available to the City's Risk Manager and Director of Engineering proof of insurance throughout the term of this contract and prior to the policy expiration dates. D. CenturyLink agrees that, with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • Include the City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, as additional insureds by endorsement with regard to operations, completed operations, and activities of or on behalf of the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; C:\Users\arb9I00\[)ocuments\Corpus Christi conduit Iease\CenturyLink conduit agreement with Corpus Christi F[NAI.4.27.I6_docx Contract / CON[) 1'X 189946 CL Page 9 of 14 • Coverage will be primary and non-contributory to any insurance maintained by the City of Corpus Christi; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and E. Prior to any cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination of coverage, CenturyLink shall make available to the City's Risk Manager and Director of Engineering proof of insurance including evidence of applicable endorsements. City shall have the option to suspend CenturyLink's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. F. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon CenturyLink's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order CenturyLink to stop work hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to CenturyLink hereunder until CenturyLink demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. G. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which CenturyLink may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from CenturyLink's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this contract. H. It is agreed that CenturyLink's insurance shall be deemed primary and non- contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of CenturyLink's operations under this contract. 1. It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this contract. C:\Users\arb9100\Documents\Corpus Christi conduit (ease\CenturyLink conduit agreement with Corpus Christi FINAL 4.27.16.docx Contract a COND TX 189946 C1, Page 10 of 14 EXHIBIT C RELOCATION AND CITY USE OF CENTURYLINK FACILITIES. (a) (1) As a further consideration for the granting of this Agreement, CENTURYLINK, in conjunction with the requirements of any City project shall at its sole expense make such relocations of its facilities within City rights-of-way or take other steps as may be necessary to facilitate such City project. Such relocations shall be under the same terms and conditions as the initial installation allowed pursuant to this agreement. (2) The City reserves the right to lay, and permit to be laid, sewer, gas, water, and other pipe lines or cables and conduits, including telecommunications and cable television lines, and to do and permit to be done any underground and overhead work that may be deemed necessary or proper by the City, in, across, along, over, or under any right-of-way occupied by CENTURYLINK and to change any curb or sidewalk or the grade of any street. In performing or permitting such work to be done, the City shall not be liable to CENTURYLINK for any damages related to such work, nor shall the City be liable to CENTURYLINK for any damages not proximately caused by the City's sole negligence, provided, however, nothing herein shall relieve any other person or corporation from liability for damage to facilities of CENTURYLINK. (3) In the event that the City authorizes abutting landowners to occupy space under the surface of any street, alley, highway, or public place, such grant to an abutting landowner shall be subject to the rights of CENTURYLINK described herein. In the event that the City plans to close or abandon any right-of-way which contains any existing CENTURYLINK facilities, City shall, (1) give notice of the date the city council is to consider the closure or abandonment, (2) if requested by CENTURYLINK, reserve a continuing right for CENTURYLINK facilities, and (3) make any subsequent conveyance of land involved in the closure or abandonment subject to the specific right of continued occupancy by CENTURYLINK or require the beneficiaries of the closure or abandonment to pay the costs associated with relocation of CENTURYLINK facilities to alternate acceptable locations. (4) Whenever it shall be necessary to require CENTURYLINK to alter, change, adapt, or conform its facilities within the right-of-way, such alterations or changes shall be made promptly, with consideration given to the magnitude of such alterations or changes, without claim for reimbursement or damages against the City. If any such requirements impose a financial hardship upon CENTURYLINK, CENTURYLINK shall have the right to present alternative proposals to the City, and the City shall give due consideration to any such alternative proposals. It is understood and further provided, however, that the City shall not require CENTURYLINK to remove its facilities entirely from such right-of-way. If the City requires CENTURYLINK to adapt or conform its facilities to enable any other entity or person, except the City, to use, or to use with greater convenience, or rights-of-way, CENTURYLINK shall not be required to make any such changes until such other entity or person shall reimburse or make C:\Llsers\arb9100\[)ocuments\Corpus Christi conduit leaselCenturyLink conduit agreement with Corpus Christi FINAL 4.27. [6.docx Contract # COND rX 18994G CL Page 11 of 14 arrangements satisfactory to CENTURYLINK to reimburse CENTURYLINK for any loss and expense caused by or arising out of such change; provided, however, that the City shall never be liable for such reimbursement. (5) For public improvement projects where, after notification that facility relocation is required, CENTURYLINK has not, prior to the beginning of construction by the City, relocated its affected facilities within the rights-of-way after being afforded a reasonable length of time to do so as determined by the City's Director of Engineering (sometimes also referred to herein as the "City Engineer"), or other designee of the City Manager, giving consideration to the scope of the facility relocation, and when such delays are not caused by actions of the City, the following procedure will be followed. The City shall provide CENTURYLINK with reasonable notice of failure to act and request relocation. If CENTURYLINK continues to delay, the City's Director of Engineering or other designee and CENTURYLINK's Division Manager over outside plant engineering and construction will jointly review the relocation request in an expeditious manner to establish a mutually acceptable completion date for the relocation. If CENTURYLINK continues to delay or does not meet the revised completion date, the City's Director of Engineering or other designee shall provide not less than five (5) days written notice to CENTURYLINK's Division Manager over outside plant engineering and construction advising CENTURYLINK of the City's intent to effect the relocation of the affected facilities. If after expiration of the written notice required by the preceding sentence, CENTURYLINK continues to delay, the City shall have the right to effect relocation of the affected facilities and CENTURYLINK shall reimburse the City for all costs of such relocation. The City shall not be liable to CENTURYLINK for any damage to such facilities unless proximately caused by the City's gross negligence, and shall not be liable in any event for any consequential damages relating to service interruptions. Such relocation by the City will be performed only when the Director of Engineering determines that it is necessary to prevent disruption of a City project. Such relocation will be accomplished by means of temporary construction and in a manner which will not unreasonably disrupt telecommunications services. The City shall make every effort to coordinate with CENTURYLINK prior to such necessary relocations and will not attempt to relocate such facilities until the City has exhausted the foregoing procedures. CENTURYLINK shall ultimately be responsible for the final permanent relocation of CENTURYLINK's facilities. (6) Where City Council finds that use of the facilities by another governmental agency serves the public purpose, the City may make facilities reserved for the City available to such agency on terms and conditions not inconsistent herewith. (7) All facilities shall be underground unless placed on existing poles of another utility. CENTURYLINK shall lay, construct, operate, lease, maintain, repair and replace the telecommunications facilities in a manner that will not unreasonably interfere with use of the streets, alleys, or any public property or other public ways ("Public Way"). Should the owner of existing poles place their facilities underground, CENTURYLINK shall do likewise. C:\Users\arb9100\Documents\Corpus Christi conduit IeaselCenturyLink conduit agreement with Corpus Christi FINAL, 4.27.16.docx Contract 1€ COND TX 189946 Ct. Page 12 of 14 (8) CENTURYLINK shall at its own expense repair, to the satisfaction of the City, all City owned water lines, storm and sanitary sewer lines, service lines, water meters, streets, sidewalks, curbs, gutters or other property of the City damaged by any of the operations of CENTURYLINK, its contractors, subcontractors, employees, agents or assigns engaged in pursuant to this agreement. (9) Before CENTURYLINK constructs, extends or replaces the telecommunications facilities in any Public Way, it shall apply for and acquire a construction permit and pay all fees associated with same in accordance with this Agreement and file with City Engineer a written work description, including scale drawings, showing the facility's location (or proposed location) and estimated depth of the facilities (existing and proposed). Such drawings and specifications shall be prepared, executed and sealed by a registered professional engineer. Such drawings and specifications will be reviewed by City Engineer and any comments will be provided to CENTURYLINK within thirty (30) days. CENTURYLINK agrees to make any changes to the drawings and specifications requested by City Engineer. Before CENTURYLINK performs any maintenance repairs, replacement or removal of facilities, CENTURYLINK shall give at least thirty (30) days notice to City Engineer as to the time and location of the proposed construction, repairs or replacement. Daily work schedules shall be provided to City Engineer by 8:30 a.m, each day any construction, repair or replacement of facility by CENTURYLINK is performed. When an emergency occurs that involves the facilities, repairs shall be performed by CENTURYLINK and notice shall be given to City Engineer within twenty-four (24) hours following initiation of such emergency repairs. Approval of all non -emergency construction, repair and replacement of the facilities must be obtained prior to such construction, repair and replacement, unless otherwise provided. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Approval by City Engineer shall constitute utility authority for the issuance of permits. (10) All work in the Public Way and other surfaces will be performed in accordance with the City specifications and regulations for Street and Storm Drainage & Street Paving Construction which are available by contacting City Street Department and be subject to regulation, control and direction of the City Engineer. All work done in connection with the laying, construction, operation, maintenance, repairing and replacement of the facilities, in whole or in part, shall be in compliance with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules and regulations of City, County, the State of Texas, and the United States. (11) CENTURYLINK shall belong to the same underground utility locating system as the City, for which information is available by contacting City Development Services department. Prior to beginning any excavation trenching or digging using powered equipment or hand tools which may damage existing underground facilities, CENTURYLINK shall contact all appropriate underground utility coordinating systems and determine if there are any facilities in the vicinity of the proposed activities. If physical contact is made with another facility during any excavation, trenching or digging, the owner of that facility must be notified for inspection and repairs prior to C:111sers\arh9100U)ocuments\Corpus Christi conduit lease\CenturyLink conduit agreement with Corpus Christi FINAL 4.27.16.docx Contract a COND TX 189946 CL Page 13 of 14 CENTURYLINK continuing work. CENTURYLINK shall promptly respond to requests for line locations generated from other permitted, franchised or City owned utilities. (12) When CENTURYLINK performs or causes to be performed any work on any Public Way, or so closely adjacent thereto as to create hazards for the public or themselves, CENTURYLINK, its employees, agents or its contractor, shall provide construction and maintenance signs and sufficient barricades and flagmen at work sites to protect the public, equipment and workmen. The application of such traffic control devices shall be consistent with the standards and provisions of the latest addition to the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Appropriate warning lights shall be used at all construction and maintenance zones where one or more traffic lanes are being obstructed during nighttime conditions. (13) CENTURYLINK shall repair, clean up and restore the Public Way and other surfaces disturbed during the construction and repair of its facilities and shall warrant the repairs and restoration of such Public Way and other surfaces for a period of two years from the date of completion of same. City Engineer may require a Surface Correction Bond, and CENTURYLINK agrees to provide such bond with terms and conditions in the amount required by City Engineer. Such repairs, clean up and restoration shall return the Public Way and other disturbed surfaces to substantially the same condition they were in before CENTURYLINK's work began. The determination that the Public Way and other surfaces have been returned to substantially the same condition shall be made by City Engineer. (14) CENTURYLINK shall refill, and repave any cut in any pavement. All excavations made by CENTURYLINK in any portion of a Public Way for the purpose of constructing, operating, maintaining, repairing, replacing or removing a facility, or any part thereof, shall be in accordance with City standards. If, after refilling such excavation, the earth within the excavated area settles so as to leave a depression, CENTURYLINK may be required to make further necessary fills from time to time as ordered by City Engineer. CENTURYLINK shall repair all portions of any Public Way across, along, over, above or under which a facility is laid and place the same in as good a state of repair and condition as they were in at the time the construction repair, or removal was commenced. Such repairs shall be to the satisfaction of City Engineer. (15) Repair to the Public Way or other City property necessitated by any activity of CENTURYLINK shall be made by CENTURYLINK at no cost to City and in such manner as is found reasonably necessary by City Engineer. (16) Any excavation in any portion of a Public Way shall be replaced with materials of the same kind as those removed unless City Engineer approves of some other type or fill or material. CENTURYLINK shall notify City Engineer before commencing at any time excavation in any portion of any Public Way, and shall not wholly close any Public Way, but shall at all times maintain a route of travel along and within any roadway that is within a Public Way, except that in cases of emergency, City Engineer may authorize a temporary closing of any Public Way or sidewalk in order to C:\Userslarb9100\Documents\Corpus Christi conduit Iease\CenturyLink conduit agreement with Corpus Christi F[NAL 4.27.16.docx Contract # CON[) IX 189945 CL Page 14 of 14 take care of any break, leakage or other public safety risk if, in the opinion of City Engineer, such closing is necessary to protect the safety of the public. (17) If CENTURYLINK fails to commence or thereafter to diligently prosecute any repair, refilling or other work required under this agreement the City may cause the work to be done at the expense of CENTURYLINK and may recover all such expense from CENTURYLINK together with all costs and reasonable attorney fees. (18) City shall have the power at any time to order and require CENTURYLINK to remove or abate any facility that is dangerous to life or property, and in the event CENTURYLINK fails or refuses to comply after reasonable notice, City shall have the power to remove or abate such facility at the expense of CENTURYLINK, all without compensation or liability for damages to CENTURYLINK. (19) CENTURYLINK shall coordinate all such construction, repair or replacement with City Engineer. (20) Upon completion of the construction, extension or replacement of the telecommunications system for which a construction permit has been acquired, CENTURYLINK shall provide the City as -built drawings within 60 days. Accuracy of as - built drawings shall meet a survey level of accuracy of 1 foot to 50,000 feet. The drawings shall also be supplied in DXF computer file format with the location tied to one nearby UPS (Global Positioning System) City Monument. If the total length of the construction extension or replacement exceeds 1,000 feet in length within the City, it shall be tied to at least two UPS City Monuments. (20) City Engineer shall have the power to make such other reasonable rules and regulations for the placement and manner of such facilities as he may deem appropriate for the protection of the public and the Public Ways and to avoid unreasonable interference with other uses or contemplated uses of the Public Ways. City Engineer may perform regulatory inspections of any utility from time to time as he may deem appropriate for the safety of the public. City Engineer shall give five days prior written notice to agreement as to the time and date of any such inspections. CENTURYLINK shall have the right to have a representative present during such inspection. (21) When submitting an application for a construction permit as provided in this agreement, CENTURYLINK agrees to pay the applicable permit fees. (22) No construction permit shall be granted to CENTURYLINK unless and until all fees due and payable pursuant to this agreement have been paid in full, including any fees due and payable for such construction permit. C:\Userarb9100\Documents\Corpus Christi conduit tease\Centu yl.ink conduit agreement with Corpus Christi FINAL 4.27.16.docx Contract t CC)N1) TX 189946 CI, CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business e �t�ty14$ plac of business. Q,10 n0J lIs u al\ 2 Name of government4�l entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. G iz) 0 �ostptis Utt.t s-}-1 � TK 3 Provide the identification and rovide a description 10 d el k T o a,� c , a number used by the governmental entity of the services, goods, or other property Q.JI � ( maul or state agency to be provided to track or identify the contract, under the contract. n �' �'al�n vr�uu� i 0 di � o �a �-� Name of Interested Par y City, State, Country (place of business)4 t of Interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary • 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. 6 AFFIDAVIT 1.-af.. 17 AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE Sw, i o - nd subscribed befor me, by the said of A , 20 II°, to certify I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. Signature of autho es agent of contracting business entity /\QJKs, ' Jr LU 1 , this the / 0 day which, witness my hand and seal of office. PZbMOJL Aliti o(, h • 144-iii— Signature of officer admi tering oath Printed name of officer adlqlinistering oath Title of officer administering oath ADD ADDITIONAL PAGES AS NECESSARY Form provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Revised 4/8/2016 AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of June 21, 2016 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 DATE: TO: June 6, 2016 Margie C. Rose, Acting City Manager FROM: Alyssa M. Barrera, Business Liaison AlyssaB@cctexas.com (361) 826-3356 Amendment to Lease Agreement with Results Company for Mann Parking Lot CAPTION: Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an amendment to the lease agreement with the Results Companies for the City parking lot located at Mann Street and Mesquite Street to allow the lease of the entire City parking lot. PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to amend the three-year lease with the Results Company ("Results Co.") to increase the number of parking spaces in the City -owned parking lot at Mann and Mesquite Street ("Mann Parking Lot"). BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: In September 2015, the City Council approved a lease agreement with Results Co. for 85 parking spaces at the Mann Parking Lot in order to accommodate the parking needs of the employees and addition of new jobs at the current location. Results Co. is a call center that employs over 400 people and offices in the Bay View Tower at 400 Mann Street. Due to the square foot of office space needed for each production seat, this type of operation creates more parking needs than other types of office users. While the Bay View Tower is 67% occupied, the adjacent structured parking garage is 92% occupied; leaving Results Co. employees to overflow into other locations. The September 2015 agreement enabled the company to stay at its downtown location. Results Co. committed to maintain the lot, pay $2,000 per year for 85 spaces and create 150 new jobs over the term of the lease (50 per year). Recently, a new client of Results Co. selected Corpus Christi over alternative sites, expanding their operations by 75 positions beyond what had been anticipated for the year. Results approached the City to ask if we would be willing to amend our 2015 Agreement to include the remainder of spaces in the lot. Our original Agreement excluded enough parking spaces for the City to maintain its $300 per month revenue from the lot. Results agreed to pay an additional $3,600 per year for an additional 36 spaces. ALTERNATIVES: Staff explored multiple concepts to accommodate this request, including a yearly permit hangtag system. However, due to the hours of operation and transitory nature of the employees, it was impractical to manage. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: The Project and Financing Plan for Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone #3 includes a parking management study to further analyze and coordinate parking supply, demand and access in the Reinvestment Zone. The Corpus Christi Regional Economic Development Corporation and Corpus Christi Downtown Management District were involved in the discussions on Results Co.'s possible relocation. Both groups supported a parking solution that enabled them to stay at the downtown location. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: N/A EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency Item DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Parking Control (Police), Facility Maintenance FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating X Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 Encumbered / Expended Amount This item $ 900 $7,200 $8,100 BALANCE $2,900 $11,200 $14,100 Fund(s): Parking Improvement Fund Comments: This item will add $3,600 per year to the Parking Improvement Fund. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the lease. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance — Amendment to Mann Parking Lot Lease Agreement- Amendment to Mann Parking Lot Lease Ordinance Authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an amendment to the lease agreement with the Results Companies for the City parking lot located at Mann Street and Mesquite Street to allow the lease of the entire City parking lot. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS THAT: SECTION 1. The City Manager, or his designee, is authorized to execute an amendment to the lease agreement with the Results Companies for the City parking lot located at Mann Street and Mesquite Street to allow the lease of the entire City parking lot. The lease amendment increases the parking spaces leased from 85 to 121 to include the entire parking lot. The additional 36 spaces will be leased for an additional $3,600 yearly. 1 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre PASSED AND APPROVED, this the th day of ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor 2 AMENDMENT OF MANN STREET PARKING LOT LEASE AGREEMENT This amendment is made to the Mann Street Parking Lot Lease Agreement entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a municipal home -rule corporation ("City"), and The Results Companies, of 100 NE Third Ave, Suite 200, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 ("Lessee") executed on October 22, 2015. All other terms and conditions that are not hereby amended are to remain in full force and effect. It is mutually understood and agreed by and between the undersigned contracting parties to amend that previously executed agreement. WHEREAS, The Results Companies, (" Lessee") desires to lease an additional 36 parking spaces; and WHEREAS, the City is willing to lease the 36 parking spaces for an additional $3,600 yearly. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: AMENDMENT TO SECTION ONE. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY City leases to Lessee that certain property owned by City located at the intersection of Twigg Street and Mesquite Street described as follows: parking lot as described in exhibit A, for use as a parking lot. The parking lot leased currently contains 121 parking spaces. AMENDMENTS TO SECTION THREE. RENT (A.) Payment. Lessee shall pay as rental to City $5,600 per year. In Year 1, $3,600 will be prorated from the execution date of this amendment to October 22, 2016 to account for the addition of 36 parking spaces. Lease payment is payable in advance upon execution of the amendment and at the beginning of each subsequent year. (B.) Local Employment. Lessee over the term of this Agreement shall hire an additional 150 employees as described in the schedule below. Year Minimum Number of New Jobs Created Yearly Minimum Total Number of Jobs Created pursuant to Lease Agreement 1 50 50 2 50 100 3 50 150 Failure to meet the Performance Standards in any one year is cause for termination of this lease. Lessee agrees to confirm and document to the City that the minimum number of jobs created is maintained throughout the term by the lessee. Lessee agrees to provide the City with a sworn certificate certifying the number of employees employed by the lessee at the effective date of this lease and each subsequent year. Page 1 (C.) Maintenance. Lessee will maintain the Premise at its own expense. Lessee will maintain, at its sole expense, any improvements on the Premise, all fixtures connected therewith, all personal property thereon. Maintenance shall be of such quality as to maintain the Premise in a first-class condition. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Each party has each caused this Amendment to be executed as of the indicated below, both of which hereby represent that the signatures to this AGREEMENT, below, are of those persons with the capacity and authority to legally bind the PARTIES. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Margie C. Rose Acting/ Interim City Manager LEASEE THE ' COMPAN LC APP._ A6111 felo • Gencarelli III ief Financial Officer Date Date ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Date APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: Buck Brice Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney (Date) Page 2 AMENDMENT OF MANN STREET PARKING LOT LEASE AGREEMENT This amendment is made to the Mann Street Parking Lot Lease Agreement entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a municipal home -rule corporation ("City"), and The Results Companies, of 100 NE Third Ave, Suite 200, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 ("Lessee") executed on October 22, 2015. All other terms and conditions that are not hereby amended are to remain in full force and effect. It is mutually understood and agreed by and between the undersigned contracting parties to amend that previously executed agreement. WHEREAS, The Results Companies, (" Lessee") desires to lease an additional 36 parking spaces; and WHEREAS, the City is willing to lease the 36 parking spaces for an additional $3,600 yearly. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: AMENDMENT TO SECTION ONE. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY City leases to Lessee that certain property owned by City located at the intersection of Twigg Street and Mesquite Street described as follows: parking lot as described in exhibit A, for use as a parking lot. The parking lot leased currently contains 121 parking spaces. AMENDMENTS TO SECTION THREE. RENT (A.) Payment. Lessee shall pay as rental to City $5,600 per year. In Year 1, $3,600 will be prorated from the execution date of this amendment to October 22, 2016 to account for the addition of 36 parking spaces. Lease payment is payable in advance upon execution of the amendment and at the beginning of each subsequent year. (B.) Local Employment. Lessee over the term of this Agreement shall hire an additional 150 employees as described in the schedule below. Year Minimum Number of New Jobs Created Yearly Minimum Total Number of Jobs Created pursuant to Lease Agreement 1 50 50 2 50 100 3 50 150 Failure to meet the Performance Standards in any one year is cause for termination of this lease. Lessee agrees to confirm and document to the City that the minimum number of jobs created is maintained throughout the term by the lessee. Lessee agrees to provide the City with a sworn certificate certifying the number of employees employed by the lessee at the effective date of this lease and each subsequent year. Page 1 (C.) Maintenance. Lessee will maintain the Premise at its own expense. Lessee will maintain, at its sole expense, any improvements on the Premise, all fixtures connected therewith, all personal property thereon. Maintenance shall be of such quality as to maintain the Premise in a first-class condition. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Each party has each caused this Amendment to be executed as of the indicated below, both of which hereby represent that the signatures to this AGREEMENT, below, are of those persons with the capacity and authority to legally bind the PARTIES. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Margie C. Rose Acting/ Interim City Manager Date ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Date APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: Buck Brice Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney (Date) LEASEE THE RES COMPANIES, LLC lo Gencare i III Chief Financial Offi Date Page 2 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Public Hearing and First Reading for the City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of July 19, 2016 DATE: June 20, 2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, Interim City Manager FROM: Daniel McGinn, AICP, Interim Director, Development Services Department DanielMc@cctexas.com (361) 826-3595 Public Hearing and First Reading for Property at 2302 and 2314 Saratoga Boulevard CAPTION: Case No. 0616-04 Kitty Hawk Development, Ltd.: A change of zoning from the "CG -1" General Commercial District to the "IL" Light Industrial District. The property to be rezoned is described as being a 2.8 acre tract of land encompassing all of Lots 1 through 3, Block 10, Saratoga Place and a portion of Lots 4 through 9 and a portion of Lot 12, Block 10, Saratoga Place, located on the north side of Saratoga Boulevard (State Highway 357) and approximately 120 feet west of Ayers Street. PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to rezone the property to allow light industrial uses. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (June 1, 2016): Denial of the change of zoning from the "CG -1" General Commercial District to the "IL" Light Industrial District and, in lieu thereof, approval of the "IC" Industrial Compatible District. Vote Results For: Unanimous Against: 0 Absent: 0 BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: As detailed in the attached report, the applicant is requesting a rezoning from the "CG -1" General Commercial District to the "IL" Light Industrial District to allow the construction of a fencing company with a 5,000 square foot building and the remainder being outdoor storage. It is staff's opinion that the proposed "IL" District rezoning could negatively impact the surrounding properties (Cabaniss Field) by allowing uses that could congregate large groups of people, i.e. businesses with more than 50 persons per acre, or allow uses that could interfere with flight operations such as the stockpiling of sand or gravel or structures with unlimited height. The property is otherwise suitable for industrial uses in terms of location on an arterial street, and the availability of utility services. The property to be rezoned is consistent with the Future Land Use Plan's designation of the property with light industrial use. The recently created Industrial Compatible District would allow the applicant's desired use and would also be consistent with Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) recommendations for protecting Navy flight operations at Cabaniss Field. The applicant is agreeable to rezoning to the "IC" District in lieu of the "IL" District. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the rezoning to "IC" Industrial Compatible District as recommended by Staff and Planning Commission. 2. Approve the request to "IL" Light Industrial District (requires 3/4 vote). 3. Deny the request. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not Applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Southside Area Development Plan and is consistent with the adopted Future Land Use Plan, which slates the property for light industrial use. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal and Planning Commission FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital • •Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015- 2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance for the "IC" District (PC/Staff Recommendation) Ordinance for the "IL" District (Original Request) Presentation - Aerial Map Planning Commission Final Report Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), upon application by Kitty Hawk Development, Ltd. ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to a 2.8 acre tract of land encompassing all of Lots 1 through 3, Block 10, Saratoga Place and a portion of Lots 4 through 9 and a portion of Lot 12, Block 10, Saratoga Place, from the "CG -1" General Commercial District to the "IC" Industrial Compatible District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its final report and recommendation regarding the application of Kitty Hawk Development, Ltd. ("Owner"), for an amendment to the City of Corpus Christi's Unified Development Code ("UDC") and corresponding UDC Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, during a meeting of the Planning Commission when the Planning Commission recommended denial of the change of zoning from the "CG -1" General Commercial District to the "IL" Light Industrial District and, in lieu thereof, approval of the "IC" Industrial Compatible District, and on Tuesday, July 12, 2016, during a meeting of the City Council, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve the public health, necessity, convenience and general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Upon application made by Kitty Hawk Development, Ltd. ("Owner"), the Unified Development Code ("UDC") of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas ("City"), is amended by changing the zoning on a 2.8 acre tract of land encompassing all of Lots 1 through 3, Block 10, Saratoga Place and a portion of Lots 4 through 9 and a portion of Lot 12, Block 10, Saratoga Place, located on the north side of Saratoga Boulevard (State Highway 357) and approximately 120 feet west of Ayers Street (the "Property"), from the "CG -1" General Commercial District to the "IC" Industrial Compatible District (Zoning Map No. 049036), as shown in Exhibits "A", "B" and "C". Exhibit A, which is a metes and bounds description of the portions of Lots 4 through 9 and a portion of Lot 12 of the Property, Exhibit B, which is a map to accompany the metes and bounds, and Exhibit C, which is a map of the entire Property, are attached to and incorporated in this ordinance by reference as if fully set out herein in their entireties. SECTION 2. The official UDC Zoning Map of the City is amended to reflect changes made to the UDC by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 3. The UDC and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City, made effective July 1, 2011, and as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance, both remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. The change of zoning does not result in an amendment to the Future Land Use Map, an element of the Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 5. All ordinances or parts of ordinances specifically pertaining to the zoning of the Property and that are in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 6. Publication shall be made in the City's official publication as required by the City's Charter. The foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre The foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 20 ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta Nelda Martinez City Secretary Mayor IC Ordinance - Kitty Hawk Development, Ltd Page 2 of 2 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NUECES Field notes of a 1.347 acre tract being out of Lots 4 — 9 and Lot 12, Block 10, Saratoga Place, as shown on a map recorded in Volume 50, Page 140, Map Records Nueces County, Texas. Said 1.347 acres also described in a deed recorded in Document No. 2011026100, Deed Records Nueces County, Texas. Said 1.347 acres being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the intersection of the northwest right of way of Ayers Street and the northeast right of way of Saratoga Boulevard, for the south corner of Lot 11, THENCE with the northeast right of way of Saratoga Boulevard, North 61°52'17" West, a distance of 164.75 feet to a 5/8" iron rod found in the common line of Lot 9 and the northeast right of way of Saratoga Boulevard, for the south corner of this survey, and for the POINT of BEGINNING. THENCE North 00°20'27" West, a distance of 481.24 feet to a 5/8" iron rod set in the common line of Lot 12 and this survey, for the northeast corner of this survey, and for a point of curvature of a non tangent curve to the right having a radius of 150.90 feet. THENCE with said curve, a chord bearing of North 67°32'44" West, and a chord distance of 29.87 feet to a set 5/8" iron rod set for the northwest corner of this survey, from WHENCE a 5/8" iron rod found bears, North 61°52'17" West, a distance of 214.17 feet. THENCE South 61°52'17" East, a distance of 5.78 feet to a 5/8" iron rod set for the common north corner of Lot 3 and Lot 4, and for an inside corner of the survey. THENCE with the common line of Lot 3 and Lot 4, South 28°10'12" West, a distance of 420.08 feet to a 5/8" iron rod set in the northeast right of way of Saratoga Boulevard, for the common south corner of Lot 3 and Lot 4, and for the west corner of this survey, from WHENCE a 5/8" iron rod found in the common line of the northeast right of way of Saratoga Boulevard and Lot 1 bears, North 61°52'17" West, a distance of 140.14 feet . THENCE with the northeast right of way of Saratoga Boulevard, South 61°52'17" East, a distance of 253.65 feet to the POINT of BEGINNING of this tract, and containing 1.347 acres of land, more or less. Notes: 1.) Bearings are based on Global Positioning System NAD 83 (93) 4205 Datum. 2.) A Map of equal date accompanies this Metes and Bounds description. 3.) Set 5/8" iron rod = iron rod set with yellow plastic cap labeled Brister Surveying. I, Ronald E. Brister do hereby certify that this survey of the property legally described herein was made on the ground this day March 15, 2016 and is correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Ronald E. Brister, RPLS No. 5407 Date: March 17, 2016. Job No. 16298 EXHIBIT A on. seautla•ua.a..m. yr SOWS r.!V uw w.uaAwy LS_ Mr n. u.urn mania? AIJIIKNRTIACT•CpoCSI*UA..SAW Lar% lutVILLYaA10CARAC'LASINCAl4C .wr 241:11, .pg WiCLC R M= MC LM larn tOltir.p raC ARTY. MAL WY tMAeraruerAGO rGfaIICIM A DM it tattl131X W.LICAT LlOYYlLL ntlnlR rxIKYCALMR Moat MIMI= enT Cr Callu nurn I.R+tT1b 1•srL G1u10.wfaWallf At en wapaeOuuri Oita alausa3arn unu 1"7" • I l!I MAMA 111 IA lPl_fl h i 17. tpiy � =E t hh ssa.�- � � 4 urn 1071 ... 4111 Ff bd 11 k! MO ii ,4`x ---- t P IAIrACf{L runsr. ,�1� .r -- �_ 3 Vs iF ._._ kph I • y' k, A\ E I6t 1 LOTH -. r1W flNt� ) uuwa WNW, 6.•••••••1..••• r.e ' i1�.Y N wY..ot AIM wro ..= O. lu'n'Ira OW {r1.CT1 r PPATO0411011[LVMb INIYYL7tlrvA — p.MrYeMOWN= O.IO .14.1,IApaAM EXHIBIT B IJ shams... a.r..a,M rlWM.YacYa,t.••r Ma.aans ,L,. c. lJ .11.11 I Mw nun. .11AJtril �a bo vrnau areaw. q Atra.a.rq rankle.. &V1�SANlyiilg 1 awwur, wine v nwYYA.YnYr lw.u.wara=1.mm .a.qx. i�wrw 4, CO eV Z L 800 Feet FR Date Created: 5/19/2 Prepa'�ed� ly: JeremyM Department f^Development Se.VT CASE: 0616-01 SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH ZONING Subject Property RM -1 Multifamily 1 RM -2 Multifamily 2 RM -3 Multifamily 3 ON Professional Office RM -AT Multifamily AT CN -1 Neighborhood Commercial CN -2 Neighborhood Commercial CR -1 Resort Commercial CR -2 Resort Commercial CG -1 General Com mercial CG -2 General Commercial CI Intensive Commercial CBD Downtown Commercial CR -3 Resort Commercial FR Farm Rural H Historic Overlay BP Business Park IL Light Industrial IH Heavy Industrial PUD Planned unit Dev. Overlay RS -10 Single -Family 14 RS -6 Single-Family6 RS -4.5 Single -Family 4.5 RS -TF TWo-Family RS -15 Single -Family 15 RE Residential Estate RS-TH Townhouse SP Special Permit RV Recreational Vehicle Park RMH Manufactured Home LOCATION MAP SUBJE PROPERTY +Ca,� City of Corpus Christi EXHIBIT C Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), upon application by Kitty Hawk Development, Ltd. ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to a 2.8 acre tract of land encompassing all of Lots 1 through 3, Block 10, Saratoga Place and a portion of Lots 4 through 9 and a portion of Lot 12, Block 10, Saratoga Place, from the "CG -1" General Commercial District to the "IL" Light Industrial District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its final report and recommendation regarding the application of Kitty Hawk Development, Ltd. ("Owner"), for an amendment to the City of Corpus Christi's Unified Development Code ("UDC") and corresponding UDC Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, during a meeting of the Planning Commission when the Planning Commission recommended denial of the change of zoning from the "CG -1" General Commercial District to the "IL" Light Industrial District and, in lieu thereof, approval of the "IC" Industrial Compatible District, and on Tuesday, July 12, 2016, during a meeting of the City Council, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve the public health, necessity, convenience and general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Upon application made by Kitty Hawk Development, Ltd. ("Owner"), the Unified Development Code ("UDC") of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas ("City"), is amended by changing the zoning on a 2.8 acre tract of land encompassing all of Lots 1 through 3, Block 10, Saratoga Place and a portion of Lots 4 through 9 and a portion of Lot 12, Block 10, Saratoga Place, located on the north side of Saratoga Boulevard (State Highway 357) and approximately 120 feet west of Ayers Street (the "Property"), from the "CG -1" General Commercial District to the "IL" Light Industrial District (Zoning Map No. 049036), as shown in Exhibits "A", "B" and "C". Exhibit A, which is a metes and bounds description of the portions of Lots 4 through 9 and a portion of Lot 12 of the Property, Exhibit B, which is a map to accompany the metes and bounds, and Exhibit C, which is a map of the entire Property, are attached to and incorporated in this ordinance by reference as if fully set out herein in their entireties. SECTION 2. The official UDC Zoning Map of the City is amended to reflect changes made to the UDC by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 3. The UDC and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City, made effective July 1, 2011, and as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance, both remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. The change of zoning does not result in an amendment to the Future Land Use Map, an element of the Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 5. All ordinances or parts of ordinances specifically pertaining to the zoning of the Property and that are in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 6. Publication shall be made in the City's official publication as required by the City's Charter. The foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre The foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 20 ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta Nelda Martinez City Secretary Mayor IL Ordinance - Kitty Hawk Development, Ltd. Page 2 of 2 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NUECES Field notes of a 1.347 acre tract being out of Lots 4 — 9 and Lot 12, Block 10, Saratoga Place, as shown on a map recorded in Volume 50, Page 140, Map Records Nueces County, Texas. Said 1.347 acres also described in a deed recorded in Document No. 2011026100, Deed Records Nueces County, Texas. Said 1.347 acres being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the intersection of the northwest right of way of Ayers Street and the northeast right of way of Saratoga Boulevard, for the south corner of Lot 11, THENCE with the northeast right of way of Saratoga Boulevard, North 61°52'17" West, a distance of 164.75 feet to a 5/8" iron rod found in the common line of Lot 9 and the northeast right of way of Saratoga Boulevard, for the south corner of this survey, and for the POINT of BEGINNING. THENCE North 00°20'27" West, a distance of 481.24 feet to a 5/8" iron rod set in the common line of Lot 12 and this survey, for the northeast corner of this survey, and for a point of curvature of a non tangent curve to the right having a radius of 150.90 feet. THENCE with said curve, a chord bearing of North 67°32'44" West, and a chord distance of 29.87 feet to a set 5/8" iron rod set for the northwest corner of this survey, from WHENCE a 5/8" iron rod found bears, North 61°52'17" West, a distance of 214.17 feet. THENCE South 61°52'17" East, a distance of 5.78 feet to a 5/8" iron rod set for the common north corner of Lot 3 and Lot 4, and for an inside corner of the survey. THENCE with the common line of Lot 3 and Lot 4, South 28°10'12" West, a distance of 420.08 feet to a 5/8" iron rod set in the northeast right of way of Saratoga Boulevard, for the common south corner of Lot 3 and Lot 4, and for the west corner of this survey, from WHENCE a 5/8" iron rod found in the common line of the northeast right of way of Saratoga Boulevard and Lot 1 bears, North 61°52'17" West, a distance of 140.14 feet . THENCE with the northeast right of way of Saratoga Boulevard, South 61°52'17" East, a distance of 253.65 feet to the POINT of BEGINNING of this tract, and containing 1.347 acres of land, more or less. Notes: 1.) Bearings are based on Global Positioning System NAD 83 (93) 4205 Datum. 2.) A Map of equal date accompanies this Metes and Bounds description. 3.) Set 5/8" iron rod = iron rod set with yellow plastic cap labeled Brister Surveying. I, Ronald E. Brister do hereby certify that this survey of the property legally described herein was made on the ground this day March 15, 2016 and is correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Ronald E. Brister, RPLS No. 5407 Date: March 17, 2016. Job No. 16298 EXHIBIT A on. seautla•ua.a..m. yr SOWS r.!V uw w.uaAwy LS_ Mr n. u.urn mania? AIJIIKNRTIACT•CpoCSI*UA..SAW Lar% lutVILLYaA10CARAC'LASINCAl4C .wr 241:11, .pg WiCLC R M= MC LM larn tOltir.p raC ARTY. MAL WY tMAeraruerAGO rGfaIICIM A DM it tattl131X W.LICAT LlOYYlLL ntlnlR rxIKYCALMR Moat MIMI= enT Cr Callu nurn I.R+tT1b 1•srL G1u10.wfaWallf At en wapaeOuuri Oita alausa3arn unu 1"7" • I l!I MAMA 111 IA lPl_fl h i 17. tpiy � =E t hh ssa.�- � � 4 urn 1071 ... 4111 Ff bd 11 k! MO ii ,4`x ---- t P IAIrACf{L runsr. ,�1� .r -- �_ 3 Vs iF ._._ kph I • y' k, A\ E I6t 1 LOTH -. r1W flNt� ) uuwa WNW, 6.•••••••1..••• r.e ' i1�.Y N wY..ot AIM wro ..= O. lu'n'Ira OW {r1.CT1 r PPATO0411011[LVMb INIYYL7tlrvA — p.MrYeMOWN= O.IO .14.1,IApaAM EXHIBIT B IJ shams... a.r..a,M rlWM.YacYa,t.••r Ma.aans ,L,. c. lJ .11.11 I Mw nun. .11AJtril �a bo vrnau areaw. q Atra.a.rq rankle.. &V1�SANlyiilg 1 awwur, wine v nwYYA.YnYr lw.u.wara=1.mm .a.qx. i�wrw 4, CO eV Z L 800 Feet FR Date Created: 5/19/2 Prepa'�ed� ly: JeremyM Department f^Development Se.VT CASE: 0616-01 SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH ZONING Subject Property RM -1 Multifamily 1 RM -2 Multifamily 2 RM -3 Multifamily 3 ON Professional Office RM -AT Multifamily AT CN -1 Neighborhood Commercial CN -2 Neighborhood Commercial CR -1 Resort Commercial CR -2 Resort Commercial CG -1 General Com mercial CG -2 General Commercial CI Intensive Commercial CBD Downtown Commercial CR -3 Resort Commercial FR Farm Rural H Historic Overlay BP Business Park IL Light Industrial IH Heavy Industrial PUD Planned unit Dev. Overlay RS -10 Single -Family 14 RS -6 Single-Family6 RS -4.5 Single -Family 4.5 RS -TF TWo-Family RS -15 Single -Family 15 RE Residential Estate RS-TH Townhouse SP Special Permit RV Recreational Vehicle Park RMH Manufactured Home LOCATION MAP SUBJE PROPERTY +Ca,� City of Corpus Christi EXHIBIT C Aerial Overview Aerial I N Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL REPORT Case No. 0616-01 HTE No. 16-10000016 Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 1, 2016 Applicant & Legal Description Applicant/Owner: Kitty Hawk Development, Ltd. Representatives: Wayne Lundquist Legal Description/Location: Being a 2.8 acre tract of land encompassing all of Lots 1 through 3, Block 10, Saratoga Place and a portion of Lots 4 through 9 and a portion of Lot 12, Block 10, Saratoga Place, located on the north side of Saratoga Boulevard (State Highway 357) and approximately 120 feet west of Ayers Street. Zoning Request From: "CG -1" General Commercial District To: "IL" Light Industrial District Area: 2.8 acres Purpose of Request: To allow light industrial uses. Existing Zoning and Land Uses Existing Zoning District Existing Land Use Future Land Use Site "CG -1" General Commercial Vacant Light Industrial North "IL" Light Industrial Public/Semi-Public & Vacant Light Industrial South "IL" Light Industrial Commercial & Vacant Light Industrial East "CG -1" General Commercial Public/Semi-Public Public/Semi-Public West "IL" Light Industrial Commercial and Vacant Light Industrial ADP, Map & Violations Area Development Plan: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Southside Area Development Plan and is planned for light industrial uses. The proposed rezoning to the "IL" Light Industrial District is consistent with the adopted Future Land Use Map and the Southside Area Development Plan. Map No.: 049036 Zoning Violations: None Transportation Transportation and Circulation: The subject property has approximately 400 feet of street frontage along Saratoga Boulevard, which is an "A3" Primary Arterial Divided street. Planning Commission Final Report Page 2 Street R.O.W. Street Urban Transportation Plan Type Proposed Section Existing Section Traffic Volume (2013) Saratoga Boulevard "A3" Primary Arterial Divided 130' ROW 79' paved 117' ROW 90' paved 23,092 ADT Staff Summary: Requested Zoning: The applicant is requesting a rezoning from the "CG -1" General Commercial District to the "IL" Light Industrial District to allow the construction of a fencing company with outdoor storage. Development Plan: The applicant is proposing a fencing company with a 5,000 square foot building and the remainder being outdoor storage. At a minimum, the Unified Development Code would require a 20 -foot wide front yard on Saratoga Boulevard, a five-foot wide side yard and a 10 foot -wide rear yard. All outside storage shall be screened from public view in accordance with Section 7.4 of the Unified Development Code. A buffer yard of 10 feet with five landscaping points would be required along the property lines abutting the "CG -1" General Commercial District. Existing Land Uses & Zoning: The subject property is vacant and zoned "CG -1" General Commercial and designated for future light industrial uses. North and west of the subject property is zoned "IL" Light Industrial and is vacant land designated for future light industrial uses. South of the subject property across Saratoga Boulevard is zoned "IL" Light Industrial, consisting of commercial and vacant land use with a designation for future light industrial uses. East of the subject property is zoned "CG -1" General Commercial and consists of vacant land designated for future public/semi- public uses. AICUZ: The subject property is not located in one of the Navy's Air Installation Compatibility Use Zones (AICUZ) but is adjacent to a Cabaniss Field "CZ" Clear Zone. Comprehensive Plan & Area Development Plan Consistency: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Southside Area Development Plan (ADP). The proposed rezoning to the "IL" Light Industrial District is consistent with the Southside ADP and the adopted Future Land Use Plan's designation of the property as Light Industrial. Additionally, the following are pertinent elements of the Comprehensive Plan and should be considered: Corpus Christi Policy Statements, Policy d. under Military Installations recommends: "The City Policies concerning areas adjacent to military airports should be consistent with Air Installation Compatibility Use Zones (AICUZ). o The subject property is not directly under the abutting AICUZ Clear Zone however, the property is still very close and abuts an AICUZ Clear Zone. A Planning Commission Final Report Page 3 Clear Zone is the closest AICUZ to the end of the airport runway and was purchased by the City to prevent incompatible development. - The NAS Corpus Christi Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) shows that the subject property is under an area identified as a proposed Military Compatibility Overlay (MCA) area. o The JLUS recommended that the City create a zoning district that addresses appropriate uses that fall under four categories described as: Vertical Obstruction Zone; Light Subzone; Safety Subzone and a Noise Subzone. o The JLUS also showed that the subject property is in a location that could affect not only Cabaniss Field operations but also Corpus Christi International Airport. The Corpus Christi International Airport concern at this location is any light sources from property that could interfere with pilot or airport control tower operations. o In response to the JLUS, the City in 2012, created the "IC" Industrial Compatible District to provide a Light Industrial District that would prevent uses currently allowed in the "IL" Light Industrial District which could create a density of people of more than 50 persons per acre or which could interfere with Navy flight operations. Plat Status: The subject property will need to be replatted. Department Comments: • The property is served by a six lane arterial street that is fully improved and capable of providing adequate service for the proposed light industrial use. • The property is served by an existing eight -inch water line that runs along the entire Saratoga Boulevard frontage. • The property does not have access to an existing wastewater line, however there is an existing 20 inch wastewater line at the northeast corner of Saratoga Boulevard and State Highway 286, approximately 175 feet from the Subject Property. The City will determine if there is capacity in the existing wastewater line to serve the subject property during the replatting process. • The property is suitable for industrial uses in terms of location on an arterial street, and the availability of utility services. • The property to be rezoned is consistent with the Future Land Use Plan's designation of the property with light industrial use. • It is staff's opinion that the proposed "IL" District rezoning could negatively impact the surrounding properties (Cabaniss Field) by allowing uses that could congregate large groups of people, i.e. businesses with more than 50 persons per acre or allow uses that could interfere with flight operations. • The recently created Industrial Compatible District would allow the applicant's desired use and would also be consistent with Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) recommendations for protecting Navy flight operations at Cabaniss Field. Planning Commission Final Report Page 4 Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation: Denial of the change of zoning from the "CG -1" General Commercial District to the "IL" Light Industrial District and, in lieu thereof, approval of the "IC" Industrial Compatible District. Vote Results: For: Unanimous Opposed: 0 Absent: 0 Public Notification Number of Notices Mailed — 8 within 200 -foot notification area 3 outside notification area As of June 20, 2016: In Favor — 0 inside notification area — 0 outside notification area In Opposition — 0 inside notification area — 0 outside notification area Totaling 0.00% of the land within the 200 -foot notification area in opposition. Attachments: 1. Location Map (Existing Zoning & Notice Area) 2. Application 3. Public Comments Received (if any) K:\DevelopmentSvcs\SHARED\ZONING CASES\2016\0616-01 Kitty Hawk Development, LTD\Council Documents\Report - Kitty Hawk Development, Ltd..docx CASE: 0616-01 ZONING & NOTICE AREA RM -1 Multifamily 1 RM -2 Multifamily 2 RM -3 Multifamily 3 ON Professional Office RM -AT Multifamily AT CN -1 Neighborhood Commercial CN -2 CR -1 CR -2 CG -1 CG -2 £I CBD CR -3 FR H BP Neighborhood Commercial Resort Commercial Resort Commercial General Commercial General Commercial Intensive Commercial Downtown Commercial Resort Commercial Farm Rural Historic Overlay Business Park IL Light Industrial IH Heavy Industrial PUD Planned Unit Dev. Overlay RS -10 Single -Family 19 RS -6 Single -Family 6 RS -4.5 Single -Family 4.5 RS -TF Two -Family RS -15 Single -Family 15 RE Residential Estate RS-TH Townhouse SP Special Permit RV Recreational Vehicle Park RMH Manufactured Home r1Subject Property 0 Owners with 200' buffer in favor A Owners within 200' fisted an X Owners — attached ownership table en opposeion SUBJECT PROPERTY/ ll LOCATION MAP Ci ty of Corpus Christi c ` RE .,.' ! , ,: srt; >: e. Devekroment Schwas Dept P O 13ox 9377 Corpus ChnsL, Trines 731699277 (361)826-n40 t.araled m PACE Leopard Street` REZONING APPLICATION Office Use.Oniy Case No.: 0616-01 Map No.: PC Hearing Data: June 1, 2016 Pro).Mgr Hearing Location: City flail, Council Chambers, 1201 Leopard Street Hearing Time: 5:30 p.m, . A MAXIMUM OF FIVE REZONINGS CASES ARE SCHEDULED PER NEARING • INCOMPLETE APPLJCAT7GNS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. Ly 1• Applicant: K1' *y �1dr':`'tL 6, t� _ ^y�et0p•fLt -6 CanlectPerson .J[ 'tri Tires*o� Mailin//gl1Addrass• rT.sC) r s -v`' 1 � j� & —*- [ ` City. COr IPt)� Ghcrys-1 i 31a1a7 IX ZIP: CL 413 Phone' (3( -Pt i��"effc°, Z-- 50(P1 E -;nail• v Cell: (�L' 1) t—t� 2.- - 5o J 2. Property 041mor;s): 'r-r"t.'4'— Contac) Porson ._.292-t-4...--2"--' Mailing Address. � City State: ZIP: Phone: (_ ^) E-mail; Colt: L._► Q 3. Subject Property Address..20-co...*-090... Nec_.t.r r a of P. quest (SF/aces) aC • D U � 1 C:". Currant Zoning & use, Proposed Zoning & Use: , 3 L` 1 ori V54� 12-DigitNuecos Cain TaxID:� l2 ! -D010_ 0610 jjx.r1 G� ! Subdivision Name: r a'"ko b� t- l 'G cBlock 1 D Lnt(s):.7.1.n& Legol Description if not platted; 4. Submittal Requirements: 0 Early Asslstanea Meeting: Date He'd X Land Use Statement i Disclosure IF APPLICABLE. 0 Peak Hour Trip Form (It request is Incurs (] Metes & Brumes Descrtplien with exhibit 0 Appointment of Agent Form It landowner ; vilh City Staff of Interest Copy of Warranty Deed start with Future Land Use Pian) 0 Site Plan for PUD or Special Penrk if property includes un -platted land {scaled by RPLS) 0 Lien Ho:der AuttlorI atIon Es not signing this fcml I certify thtt : ave • • the City of Corpus Christi win a complete applinst:on for review, that I am authorized to iriliata this rezoning as Gro behalf of the Property O ener(s): and the information provided i5 accurate. Ar- , Owner o At; S e7 Applicant's S;mature Owner cr Agents Printed Name AppScnnte PAntee Name • Office Use Only: Date Received: Received By. ADP: Rearming Fee: 4- PUD Fee - Sign Fee = Total Fee - No. Signs Required @ btWsipn — Sign PostXlg Date: Ir lt:Slrt3 pPLINTSVCASmail£tNAND riEV£roPu£l(W UIUnON !Clad yl7L•..CV VCSUN Na AnPLx'J1Tlpt1 300-4f. Aiy-k AI / to -100000/, L&-rS 1-3, AND Polon of L-oT5 Lf -C 1Ze SoRyEy LAND USE STATEMENT 1. State the purpose of the request and include applicable background information as to the development plan for the property, i.e., usage of property, number and square footage(s) of existing and/or proposed building(s)/unit(s), building(s)/unit(s) height, parking plans/spaces, phasing schedule of development, number of employee(s) associated with the office, business or industrial development, hours of operation, modification or demolition plans for existing structure(s), type, area and setback of signage, etc. F'c nO O�'rr�cam' Wi-r 0— SiOOO± n Le—/6 0-r d - 2. Identify the existing land uses adjoining the area of request: c),A, rc-‘ ark 4 U acia.r1ar� North - South - East - Farm�O�-+� West - t) r er l.� )0 VkCe.- Sob or) arm 1 a r. d (-vcLccar- CIUSERSSTANYAR IXOZESKTOVIONLY USEUNNIKALLANO USE STATEMENT FOR ZONING bOC DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended. requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". NAME: i i f �'1 Q'C1-S �nnL d f l" -Fi STREET: Z'30 FP t & S CITY• l_.LXp 0.546 5'1 ZIP: FIRM is Corporator °Partnership °Sole Owner °Association °Other DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership In the above named 'firm". Name Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having constituting 31 or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Title f\.onve, an 'ownership interest" 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an 'ownership interest" constituting 31 or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Board. Commission, or Comm.ttee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an 'ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership In the above named "firm". Name Consu:tant CERTIFICATE I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi. Texas as changes occur. +lr �� Certifying Person: ^I 4� IF'J Title: (Print Name) Signature of Certifying Person: Date; K:IOEVELOPMEHTSVCSSHAREOY.ANO OEVELOPMENTIAP' . KATION FORLLSRE20NINCILISCLa5URE OP INttRa$t5 SctATFNENt 5-12-2015.DOC APPOJNTii1FNT OF AGENT As owner of die subject property, I hereby appoint ME person designated below to ac' fur me, ns my agent in this request. [� Nome of Agent LL L1L'1 Ln C.I Cep s'1 OD r- '1 Mailing Address � [j//�� ,�ir,!i-7`'f' Rf� ,r i� �J L-�-� F-- 1 City (.Dep s Vfl f i s4- state• 1 x Zip, —70=-1 I L Home Phone. L i 11\jPi Business Phone: 1 it" 1 1 g5c -g1_1CcIl 13 G!) J { c� -'7 I acknowledge and affirm that 1 will be Iegulfy bound by the words and acts of my agent, and by my signature helow,1 hilly authorize my agent to: De the point oreontact between Inysclf and the s it); of Corpus Christi, make legally binding representatiors of fact and commitments of every kind on my behatl, grant legally binding waivers of nghrs and releases of liab:lines of every kind on my behalf., consent to legally binding modifications, conditions, and exceptions fat my behalf' and, to execute documents on my behalf wllich are legally binding on me 1 understand that the City of Corpus Christi will deal only with a fully authorized agent. At any time it should appear that my agent has less than full authority to act, then the application may be suspended and I will have w personally participate m the disposition of the application. 1 understand that all communications related to this application are part of an otIctal proceeding ofC.'ily government and, that the Ctty will rely upon statements made by my agent Therefore, f agree to bold harmless and indemnify the City of Corpus Christi, its officers, agents, employees, and third parties who art in reliance upon my agent's words and actions from all damages. attorney fees. interest and costs arising from this matter. if my property is owned by a corporation, p :,crship, venture• or other legal entity, then I certify that I have the legal authority to mak is binding a • ointment an behalf of the entity, and every reference herein to 1", "my", or -'me" is a re rc - c to c *Signature of Agent: Printedlfypcd Name of Ai7,ent Tide L. 4 -ti GkGe T Dutc 4 'Signature of Property Owner: Tills _ Printe:dfFyped Nome of Property Owner "Signature of Property Owner: Printed/Typed Name of Properly Owner "Signature of Property Owner: PrinledfrypcdName ofProperty nor -lIr•1 -Pfo D31c Tide: Title Date 'Applicalion must be Sigord by be Individual applicant, each panneroo partnership„ or by an authorized officer of a Coi potation of avocialiiin U W Ileum -APPOINTMENT OF AGENT:I-i 9 ii9 Cue SCAI]I LIZ ACRES OTT 0PCtRm3Oai111 1R1R1 MTV TA ICU= ueil. IuwlaN+olr AIM Atr.sRIL'MY APIRAa punt= 1LYlYYor A1114 ACRE TRACT 11G1MAI1 or L0111 LRln[Y 1&!ARAn111A merit AS 31R1WN fN AMN RIX1>Rn1[II IN 111LL11LNA?A0111N I V AEXflIOSL1R111 COVNIV. IIJW. .r.Mr r a.. ti...w.mnn i....wl w. NA •.wnwn 01.1,4111.140 1.11,11 vir•rtn mho. 1 Brister Surveying RISWMN11r* IX 41111 F niii p Ig .1 y!� Mg :` °Q( 6tC °li I It i Iml Arbi I•w011Rr. IDTI f LOT St.IIMY NI ,t. nrMIINMARfi1l ,e t.c � 'Arabs RY MUM X49 e 1!Im r .fl e e py]p� yJ a • WTI* Inn! ..•c. ■..Nia.w•..w••=.N.. SAW1711r1A HULA- VANi1 10RNNmv WAY p •lrrs r lRbNRn11 .1v1m sr IKON imp 11 NNoLW IYYWAMAt MM.YM l.unw.1•n1.1yb sA.1M1.4Anw 11 • p.111M7.ARM Iw •m•rt•mi Yn111 mune coo 1..16.1.0 MUM IVINVITIMI Ir�.r rnr mon.. ma enwerre Lomas. won be wantrai.mvo 11oru`�.a.9Mm; w1rii i STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NUECES Field nags of o 1347 erre tract being out alms 4 -9 rend Lot 12, Block 10, Seenoga pier es shown an • map worded to Volume 50. Page 140, Map Records Nueees County. Texas. Said 1347 apes also desaibrd to ■ deed tcmrded in De mttetn No, 2011026100, Deed &monis Ithacan County, Texas. Said 1397 accts being root particularly described as fol lows: COMMENCING at the intersection of the northwest deo of way of Ayers Stmt and the nalleau runt of way of Saratoga Boulcvmq for the south earner of Lot 11. THENCE with the nonhean nghlof wry of San:og. Boulevard, Nosh 61.52.1r West, ■ didanee of 164.75 feet to a 54^ iron hod found in the comma[ line of Lm 9 and the northeast right of way of Sannog. Boulevard, for the math comerofthis away. and for dee POINT of BEGINNING. THENCE North 00`30.27^ Wear,. distance 01'41124 f to. 34" Ian rod sex in the common lee of Lot 12 and this survey, for the nonhost corer of thts survey, .std fora point ofcurvmure of • inn tangent curse to the right having. radius of 130.90 fat. THENCE with said ewe,. chord boring of North 6772'44" West, and a chord distance of 29.17 feet o.s054" nom rods[ for the northwest comer ofthu survey, them WHENCE . 54^ wan rod found bears, Noah 61.52' I7" Wen,. distance of 214.17 feet THENCE South 61.52' IT' Eon.* distance of 29.92 feet Ion 516" iron rod to foe the common north counsellor 3 and lot 4, and for an inside corner ofthe survey. THENCE with the thiourea line of Lot 3 and Lot 4, South 21'10'12" West,. di nonce of 420.06 feet to a 5f1"ion hod sex in the northeast right of way of S.rawyt Boulevard, for the comma= south cams of 1.011 i and Lae 9, and for the west corns oFthis survey. from WHENCE a 517- iron rat found in the common tun of the northeast right of way of Saratoga Boulevard and lot 1 hears, Nash 6192.17' Wet,. distance of140 14 feet. THENCE with the northeast right of way of Saratoga Boulevard. Scent 61.52'17" E.o, •distance of 33.65 feel to the POINT of BEGINNING of this tract, and containing 1347 acres ofland, more or Inn. Nolo: IJ Bearings, are bared on Global Positioning System NAD 13 (93) 4203 Datum. 2.) A Map acquit! date asarynni.s Ibis Man and Bounds descripion. 3.1 Set 33" ion rod -won rod set with yellow plastic rap labeled Brister Surveying, I, Ronald E. Brister do booby certify Out this surrey of the property le:ally demibed hewn was mode on Lite ground this day Mater I5 2011 and is moo to die hen ofray know kdge lad belief. �ona�?G'.'�ruals. Ronald E Boner, RPLS No. 5907 Dorm. March 17,2916. ad No r6DA wan aralAM$ la airr.wrrkn SCALE 1'. b -1,4M L • a.ru' wan -Tor A 11fm1M?Met Mem WL or LDP.& -wAmLOYu WV%u. Smalpr..AfL4LLAM It(OSLO.A air atetri OwwLLW.■ MOS MAW. WIWI 1f.9 UMAU Y.. MIXALMIo LINAtra Tu.'1Ar1O T.OGCON A IVIO/LtifatrtD p...U.1rMM LOt0Y1m rein lR rxlKY(ALMR SGML ars Anus LTR Cr cowl Daunt tanIT+[Tlb Limn 01•L,11ip4KraY1 At R1 MuagaryaRrr AFFP.VV. MIME: anuaccrn 1OT11 in MrMASI 1I? 111 (1.1.0) 31- IN 7 ° L'-_ p 1 /1 �yA� m& IOTt um at 11 .E� i , aYr E 13 WtAdp autsle. �T R y, 6Y tt iF" i. p� E C IOTA a .Kom t opoorJ 111 Wei 11•••••••11•11•014•01....ir.¢1w4 n 1•10001.1:111•10001.1:11 AM. .•=Q. 11.11•1•tra 1.0 Oawn 7A?ASOCIABOOLCVMb uruprtnw.r p.aarar LWOW O•POIMGa•ubanM I sIralaaara..M•.Ilan I1 a ps.wta.s U..a s. �aiarrvma..wraAi WAST .11AW'u Asia boao er101w. 4.=ra...9 Aalklalr. Bt6t�Saeveying 1 MOM., �Wv a n ww+n r `• 1.w1 r waraasa.ol a..a aamono I'm T Lyg, A.6 .m1a �waaw AGENDA MEMORANDUM Public Hearing and First Reading for the City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of July 19, 2016 DATE: June 20, 2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, Interim City Manager FROM: Daniel McGinn, Interim Director, Development Services Department DanielMc@cctexas.com (361) 826-3595 Public Hearing and First Reading for Property at 3945 Crosstown Expressway (State Highway 286) CAPTION: Case No. 0616-02 Coastal King, Ltd.: A change of zoning from the "CN -1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG -2" General Commercial District. The property to be rezoned is described as Lot 4, Block 4, Roseland Place, located on the northwest corner of Horne Road and Crosstown Expressway (State Highway 286). PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to rezone the property to allow construction of a self-service carwash, which is a general commercial use. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (June 1, 2016): Approval of the change of zoning from the "CN -1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG -2" General Commercial District. Vote Results For: 9 Against: 0 Absent: 0 BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: As detailed in the attached report, the applicant is requesting a rezoning from the "CN -1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG -2" General Commercial District to allow the construction of a self-service car wash. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is appropriately located for commercial uses at the intersection of an expressway and a minor arterial roadway and the rezoning is compatible with present zoning of nearby property and to the character of the surrounding area. The rezoning is not anticipated to have a negative impact upon the surrounding property. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Deny the request. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not Applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Westside Area Development Plan. The proposed rezoning to the "CG -2" General Commercial District is consistent with the adopted Future Land Use Map and the Westside Area Development Plan. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal and Planning Commission FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital • •Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015- 2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Presentation - Aerial Map Planning Commission Final Report Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), upon application by Coastal King, Ltd. ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to Lot 4, Block 4, Roseland Place, from the "CN -1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG -2" General Commercial District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its final report and recommendation regarding the application of Coastal King, Ltd. ("Owner"), for an amendment to the City of Corpus Christi's Unified Development Code ("UDC") and corresponding UDC Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, during a meeting of the Planning Commission when the Planning Commission recommended approval of the change of zoning from the "CN -1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG -2" General Commercial District, and on Tuesday, July 12, 2016, during a meeting of the City Council, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve the public health, necessity, convenience and general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Upon application made by Coastal King, Ltd. ("Owner"), the Unified Development Code ("UDC") of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas ("City"), is amended by changing the zoning on Lot 4, Block 4, Roseland Place, located on the northwest corner of Horne Road and Crosstown Expressway (State Highway 286) (the "Property"), from the "CN -1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG -2" General Commercial District (Zoning Map No. 047040), as shown in Exhibit "A". Exhibit A, which is a map of the Property, is attached to and incorporated in this ordinance by reference as if fully set out herein in its entirety. SECTION 2. The official UDC Zoning Map of the City is amended to reflect changes made to the UDC by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 3. The UDC and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City, made effective July 1, 2011, and as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance, both remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. The change of zoning does not result in an amendment to the Future Land Use Map, an element of the Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 5. All ordinances or parts of ordinances specifically pertaining to the zoning of the Property and that are in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 6. Publication shall be made in the City's official publication as required by the City's Charter. The foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre The foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 20 ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor Ordinance - Coastal King, Ltd. Page 2 of 2 CO !V SUBJEC PRCPER1 Y CG ®a Aare Cot�xed. 5/1 Prepattruwy: JertpmyM Deparrmem 0 DeVefopmem Seivlees 18 CASE: 0616-02 SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH ZONING Subject Property RM -1 Multifamily 1 RM -2 Multifamily 2 RM -3 Multifamily 3 ON Professional Office RM -AT Multifamily AT CN -1 Neighborhood Commercial CN -2 CR -1 CR -2 CG -1 CG -2 CI CBD CR -3 FR H BP Neighborhood Commercial Resort Commercial Resort Commercial General Com Mendel General Commercial Ihtensiue Commercial Downtown Commercial Resort Commercial Farah Rural Historic Overlay Business Park IL Light Industrial IH Heavy Industrial Pup Planned Unit Bev, Overlay RS -10 Single -Family 10 RS -6 Single -Fa mlly 6 RS -4.5 Single -Family 4,5 RS -TF Two -Family RS -15 Single -Family 15 RE Residential Estate RS-TH Townhouse SP Special Permit RV Recreational Vehicle Park RMH Manufactured Home LOCATION MAP mow► City of Corpus Christi Exhibit A Aerial Overview 1 N Aerial I N PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL REPORT Case No. 0616-02 HTE No. 16-10000017 Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 1, 2016 Applicant & Legal Description Applicant/Owner: Coastal King, Ltd. Representatives: Urban Engineering Legal Description/Location: Lot 4, Block 4, Roseland Place, located on the northwest corner of Horne Road and Crosstown Expressway (State Highway 286). Zoning Request From: "CN -1" Neighborhood Commercial District To: "CG -2" General Commercial District Area: 0.75 acres Purpose of Request: To allow construction of a self-service carwash, which is a general commercial use. Existing Zoning and Land Uses Existing Zoning District Existing Land Use Future Land Use Site "CN -1" Neighborhood Commercial Vacant Commercial North "CG -2" General Commercial Commercial Commercial South "RS -6" Single -Family 6 and "CN -1" Neighborhood Commercial Low Density Residential and Commercial Low Density Residential & Commercial East "IL" Light Industrial Right-of-way and Commercial Right-of-way and Light Industrial West "CG -2" General Commercial Vacant Commercial ADP, Map & Violations Area Development Plan: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Westside Area Development Plan and is planned for commercial uses. The proposed rezoning to the "CG -2" General Commercial District is consistent with the adopted Future Land Use Map and the Westside Area Development Plan. Map No.: 047040 Zoning Violations: None Transportation Transportation and Circulation: The subject property has approximately 200 feet of street frontage along Horne Road, which is an "Al" Minor Arterial Undivided street and approximately 215 feet along the Crosstown Expressway (State Highway 286) Access Road, which is an "F1" Freeway/Expressway. Planning Commission Final Report Page 2 Street R.O.W. Street Urban Transportation Plan Type Proposed Section Existing Section Traffic Volume Horne Rd. "Al" Minor Arterial Undivided 95' ROW 64' paved 80' ROW 60' paved N/A Crosstown Expressway (State Highway 286) Access Road "F1" Freeway/Expressway 400' ROW Varies- paved 350' ROW 280' paved N/A Staff Summary: Requested Zoning: The applicant is requesting a rezoning from the "CN -1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG -2" General Commercial District to allow the construction of a self-service car wash, however, if the zoning change is approved, any of the uses permitted in the "CG -2" General Commercial District may be developed on the property. Development Plan: The proposed rezoning is a part of the Roseland Place Subdivision. The applicant indicates that current plans are to construct a self-service car wash. Existing Land Uses & Zoning: The subject property is vacant and zoned "CN -1" Neighborhood Commercial. North of the subject property is zoned "CG -2" General Commercial and consists of a fast-food restaurant. South of the subject property across Horne Road is zoned "CN -1" Neighborhood Commercial and "RS -6" Single -Family 6, consisting of low density residential uses and a flower shop. East of the subject property is the freeway and across the freeway is a mini -storage facility which is zoned "IL" Light Industrial. West of the subject property is vacant and zoned "CG -2" General Commercial. AICUZ: The subject property is not located in one of the Navy's Air Installation Compatibility Use Zones (AICUZ). Plat Status: The subject property is platted. Comprehensive Plan & Area Development Plan Consistency: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Westside Area Development Plan (ADP). The proposed rezoning to the "CG -2" General Commercial District is consistent with the Westside ADP and the adopted Future Land Use Map's designation of the property for commercial uses. Applicable Comprehensive Plan policies include but are not limited to the following: Planning Commission Final Report Page 3 • Comprehensive Plan General Policy Statement D: New development should occur in a pattern which is cost effective. The City should encourage new development where services can be provided economically and, wherever possible, promote contiguous development. • Comprehensive Plan Commercial Policy Statement F: Commercial activities which generate large volumes of traffic should have direct access to an arterial road without having to traverse low-density areas. • Comprehensive Plan Commercial Policy Statement G: Commercial service areas designed to serve local neighborhoods should be conveniently located and in harmony with the surrounding neighborhood. • Comprehensive Plan Residential Policy Statement H: Encouraging infill development on vacant tracts of land within developed areas. Department Comments: • The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • The property is appropriately located for commercial uses at the intersection of an expressway and a minor arterial roadway. • The rezoning is compatible with present zoning of nearby property and to the character of the surrounding area. • A "CG -2" District would allow uses that are compatible with the surrounding properties. • The rezoning is not anticipated to have a negative impact upon the surrounding property. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation: Approval of the change of zoning from the "CN -1" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG -2" General Commercial District. Vote Results: For: 9 Opposed: 0 Absent: 0 Public Notification Number of Notices Mailed — 15 within 200 -foot notification area 5 outside notification area As of June 20, 2016: In Favor —0 inside notification area — 0 outside notification area In Opposition — 1 inside notification area — 0 outside notification area Totaling 2.15% of the land within the 200 -foot notification area in opposition. Planning Commission Final Report Page 4 Attachments: 1. Location Map (Existing Zoning & Notice Area) 2. Application 3. Public Comments Received (if any) K:\DevelopmentSvcs\SHARED\ZONING CASES\2016\0616-02 Coastal King, Ltd\Council Documents\Report - Coastal King, Ltd..docx TO HWY 286 R SUBJECT PROPERTY DDY 9Si AMH h S PORT AVE CG 5-4 Date Crea'fed: 5/13/2016 IPrepa ey: Jer+io rnyM Deparrmen! of Development Sei ices CASE: 0616-02 ZONING & NOTICE AREA RM -1 Multifamily 1 RM -2 Multifamily 2 RM -3 Multifamily 3 ON Professional Office RM -AT Multifamily AT CN -1 Neighborhood Commercial CN -2 CR -1 CR -2 CG -1 CG -2 CI CBD CR -3 FR H DP Neighborhood Commercial Resort Commercial Resort Commercial General Commercial General Commercial Intensive Commercial Downtown Commercial Resort C omme rcia I Farm Rural Historic Overlay Business Park IL Light Industrial IH Heavy Industrial PUD Planned Unit Dev, Overlay RS -10 Single -Family 10 R5-6 Single -Family 6 RS -4.5 Single -Family 4.5 RS -TF Two -Family RS -15 Single -Family 15 RE Residential Estate RS-TH Townhouse 5P Special Permit Hy Recreational Vehicle Park RMH Manufactured Home nSubject Property 0Owners wish 200' buffer in favor 4 Owners within 200' listed on 'V Owners attached ownership table A in oppasihan City of Corpus Christi Development Services Dept. P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Chnsti, Texas 78469-9277 (361) 826-3240 Located at 2406 Leopard Street Applicant. Urban Engineering /e-lba000t1 REZONING APPLICATION Case No.: Map No. o`"rf z0 a PC Hearing Date; Proj.Mgr Hearing Location: Citv Hall, Council Chambers. 1201 Leopard Street Hearing Time: 5:30 p.m- • A MAXIMUM OF FIVE REZONINGS CASES ARE SCHEDULED PER HEARING. • INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. Mailing Address 2725 Swantner Drive City Corpus Christi E-mail Contact Person : Xavier Galvan xavierg@urbaneng.com State TX zip 78404 Phone 3c fi1 _)854-4187 ext. 217 Cell t Property owners) Coastal King, Ltd. Mailing Add-ess 108 N. Mesquite Street city.Corpus Christi State TX E-mail: cjalley1@gmail.com (Clinton Alley) Subject Property Address 2100 Horne Contact Person Clinton Alley ZIP 78401 Phone: 361 1882-4100 Cell �) Road © Crosstown Area of Request (SFlacres) 0.75 Acres Current Zonng & Use: CN -1 (Vacant) Proposed Zoning & Use CG -2 (Car Wash) 12 -Digit Nueces County Tax ID 750$ _ - 0004 - 0040 Subdivision Name. Roseland Place Legal Descnption if not platted. 4. Submittal Requirements: El Early Assistance Meeting Date Held 513116 E1 Land Use Statement I Disclosure of Interest © Copy of Warranty Deed 1F APPLICABLE: ❑ Peak Hour Tnp Form (if request is inconsistent with Future Land Use Plan) 0 Metes & Bounds Description with exhibit if property includes un -platted land (sealed by RPLS) El Appointment of Agent Form if landowner is not signing this form Block 4 Lot(s): 4 ; with City staff Dolores Wood ❑ Site Plan for PUD or Special Permit 0 Lien Holder Authonzatlon 1 certify ttha l ,y - provided the City of Corpus Christi with a complete as or on behalf of the Property Owner(s); an Owner'or Agent s ~ gnature Gary Hodge Owner or Agent's Printed Name Office Use Only' Date Received: 3-4614 Rezoning Fee "1 i 10 750 + PUD Fee plication for review; int.• r ation provi at l; authorized to initiate this rezoning ccurate. pplicant'- ignatu Applicant's Printed Name Received By ADP: „-2 */ 1.27 50 Ws No. Signs Required -@ $10/sign Sign Posting Date. I _ _ x 1 EVELOPMENTSVCSISHAREDtA O DEVELOPMENTl4PPLICATON PO7MSIREZONING ZONING APPLICATION 2016 OOC Fcrm Revised 5e 1222315 o`�OSt.A, Q * -I N y ., y 7 Development Services Dept, P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, 826 78469-9277 (36t) 826 -3 3240 Located at 2406 Leopard Street REZONING APPLICATION Office Use Only Case No.: Map No.: PC Hearing Date: Proj.Mgr: Hearing Location: City Hall, Council Chambers, 1201 Leopard Street Hearing Time: 5:30 p.m. *A MAXIMUM OF FIVE REZQNINGS CASES ARE SCHEDULED PER HEARING. * INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. 1. Applicant: Urban Engineering Contact Person : Xavier Galvan Mailing Address 2725 Swantner Drive city: Corpus Christi state: TX ZIP: 78404 Phone: ( 801 ) 854-4187 ext. 217 E-mail: xavierg@urbaneng.com Cell: ( ) 2. Property Owner(s): Coastal King, Ltd. Contact Person :Clinton Alley Mailing Address: 108 N. Mesquite Street City: Corpus Christi State: TX ZIP: 78401 Phone: ( 361 ) 882-4100 E-mail: cjalley1@gmail.com (Clinton Alley) Cell: ( ) 3, Subject Property Address: 2100 Horne Road @ Crosstown Area of Request (SFlacres) 0.75 Acres Current Zoning & Use CN -1 (Vacant) Proposed Zoning &Use: CG -2 (Car Wash) 12 -Digit Nueces County Tax ID: 7506 _ _ 0004 _ 0040 Subdivision Name: Roseland Place Block 4 Lot(s): 4 Legal Description if not platted: 4. Submittal Requirements: ❑■ Early Assistance Meeting: ■❑ Land Use Statement IF APPLICABLE: ❑ Peak Hour Trip Form (if request Date Held 0 Disclosure is inconsistent with exhibit landowner 518116 ; with City Staff Dolores Wood of Interest ❑ Copy of Warranty Deed with Future Land Use Plan) ❑ Site Pkan for PUD or Special Permit if property includes un -platted land (sealed by RPLS) ❑ Lien Holder Authorization is not signing this form ■ Metes & Bounds Description ❑ Appointment of Agent Form if I certify that I have provided the City of Corpus Christi with a complete application for r view; th t I am authorized to initiate this rezoning as or on behalf of the Property Owner(s); and the informatio provid d is accurate. Owner or Agent's gnat Robert G. rt, 111 Applica 's gnature Yqvi c >Livc,., r ttLA.,.. AcrJlf'et141 Owner or Agent's Printed Name Applicant's Printed Name Office Use Only: Date Received: Received By: ADP: Rezoning Fee: + PUD Fee + Sign Fee = Total Fee No. Signs Required @ $10/sign Sign Posting Date: K:VOEVELOPMENTS VCSNS HARE01LAN0 OEVE LOPMENT\APPLICATION FORM SYR EZONJNGSZONING APPLICATION 2015. DOC Form Revised 5/12/2015 LAND USE STATEMENT 1. State the purpose of the request and include applicable background information as to the development plan for the property, i.e., usage of property, number and square footage(s) of existing and/or proposed building(s)/unit(s), building(s)/unit(s) height, parking plans/spaces, phasing schedule of development, number of employee(s) associated with the office, business or industrial development, hours of operation, modification or demolition plans for existing structure(s), type, area and setback of signage, etc. The owner of the property is requesting a change of zoning from CN -1 to CG -2 for the development of a 7 bay, self -serve car wash. The car wash will have 7 wash bays, and 6 or 7 vacuum spaces. There will be one employee running the facility. It is assumed at this time that the car wash will be open 24 hours. 2. Identify the existing land uses adjoining the area of request: North - CG -2 (Restaurant) South - CN -1 (Flower Shop) and RS -6 (Residential) East - CN -1 (Crosstown Expressway) West - CG-2(Vacant) C:\USERS\TANYAR.000\DESKTOP\DAILY USE\ANNIKA\LAND USE STATEMENT FOR ZONING.DOC DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". NAME: Gary Hodge STREET: 108 N. Mesquite Street CITY: Corpus Christi, Texas ZIP: 78401 FIRM is:'®Corporation °Partnership °Sole Owner°Association l Other DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name N/A Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name N/A Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name N/A Board, Commission, or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Consultant N/A CERTIFICATE I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City o1 Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Gary Hodge (Print Name) Signature of Certifying Person: Date: 5 ' K:\ DEVELOPMENTS VCS\SHARE DALAND DEVELOPMENT\APPLICATION FORMS\REZONING\DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS STATEMENT_5 12 2015 DOC Title: Managing Director DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". NAME: Urban Engineering STREET: 2725 Swantner Drive CITY: Corpus Christi, Texas ZIP: 78404 FIRM is:°Corporation °Partnership °Sole Owner CAssociation Other DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 't. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name N/A Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name N/A Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name N/A Board, Commission, or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Consultant N/A CERTIFICATE I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Xavier Galvan Certifying Person: (Print Name Signature of Certifying Person: KSOEVELOPMENTSVCSISHARED ILAND DEV Title: Date: f I'eqnu+ r � OPMENTIAPPLDCATIOA'FeRM51REZONINGIDISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS STATEMENT_5.12.201.5.DOC u � ikc n t3T -t't DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". NAME: Robert G. Hart, III STREET: 108 N. Mesquite Street CITY: Corpus Christi, TexasZIP: 78401 FIRM is: Corporation °Partnership [Sole Owner [Association Other DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Job Title and City Department (if known) N/A 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Title N/A 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Board, Commission, or Committee N/A 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant'" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name N/A Consultant CERTIFICATE I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Robert G. Hart, III Title: Managing Owner Certifying Person: (Print Name) '` IG Signature of Certifying Person: Date: K. \DEVELOPMENTSVCS\SHARED\LAND DEVELOPMENT\APPLICATION FORMS \REZONING\DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS STATEMENT_5 12.2015 DOC APPOINTMENT OF AGENT As owner of the subject property, l hereby appoint the person designated below to act for me, as my agent in this request. Name of Agent: Urban Engineering Mailing Address: 2725 Swartter Drive City: Corpus Christi State: Texas zip: 78404 Home Phone: f ) Business Phone: ( 361 ) 854-3101 Cell: ( I acknowledge and affirm that I will be legally bound by the words and acts of my agent, and by my signature below, I fully authorize my agent to: 13e the point of contact between myself and the City of Corpus Christi; make legally binding representations of fact and commitments of every kind on my behalf; grant legally binding waivers of rights and releases of liabilities of every kind on my behalf; consent to legally binding modifications; conditions, and exceptions on my behalf; and, to execute documents on my behalf which are legally binding on rne. I understand that the City of Corpus Christi will deal only with a fully authorized agent. At any time it should appear that my agent has Tess than full authority to act, then the application may be suspended and I will have to personally participate in the disposition of the application. I understand that all communications related to this application are part of an official proceeding of City government and, that the City will rely upon statements made by my agent. Therefore, I agree to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Corpus Christi, its officers, agents, employees, and third parties who act in reliance upon my agent's words and actions from all damages, attorney fees, interest and costs arising from this matter. If my property is owned by a corporation, partnership, venture, or other legal entity, then I certify that I have the legal authority to make this binding appointment on behalf of the entity, and every reference herein to "I", "my", or `me" is a refere the entity. *Signature of Agent: Printed/Typed Name o avier *Signature of Property Owner: Project Manager/Senior Title: Platting Tech Ivan for Urban Engineering Date: � /0, Managing Owner of Hart Restaurant Management, Inc., General Partner Title: of Coastal King, Ltd. Printed/Typed Name of Property Owner: Rob *Signature of Property Owner: Printed/Typed Name of Property Owner: rt G. Hart, III try '' odge Date: r' 4.- Managing Director of Hart Restaurant Management, Inc., General Partner Title: of Coastal King, Ltd. Date: -. • l (� ''Signature of Property Owner: Title: Printed/Typed Name of Property Owner: Date: *Application must be signed by the individual applicant, each partner of a partnership, or by an authorized officer of a corporation or association. D W Brown APPOINTMENT OF AGENT2-19-09 doc Persons with disabilities planning to attend this meeting, who may require special services, are requested to contact the Development Services Department at least 48 hours in advance at (361) 826-3240. Personas con incapacidades, que tienen la intention de asistir a este junta v que requieren servicios especiales, se les suplica que den aviso 48 horas antes de la junta Ilamando al departamento de servicios de desarrollo. al niumero (361) 826-3240. If you wish to address the Commission during the meeting and your English is limited, please call the Development Services Department at (361) 826-3240 at least 48 hours in advance to request an interpreter be present during the meeting. Si usted desea dirigirse a la commission durante la junta v su irides es limitado, favor de Ilamar al departamento de servicios de desarrollo al numero (361) 826-3240 al menos 48 horas antes de la junta para solicitar , un interprete ser presente durante la iunta. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Rezoning Case No. 0616-02 r, WI MAY 2 ; 2016 DEVELOPMFNT SERVICES 'SPECIAL SER�+ICES.... Coastal King, Ltd. has petitioned the City of Corpus Christi to consider a z "CN -f" Neighborhood Commercial District to the "CG -2" General Commercial District, not resulting in a change to the Future Land Use Map. The property to be rezoned is described as: Lot 4, Block 4, Roseland Place, located on the northwest corner of Horne Road and Crosstown Expressway (State Highway 286). The Planning Commission may recommend to City Council approval or denial, or approval of an intermediate zoning classification and/or Special Permit. Approval of a change of zoning, if inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, will also have the effect of amending the Comprehensive Plan to reflect the approved zoning. The Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing for this rezoning request to discuss and formulate a recommendation to the City Council. The public hearing will be held on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, during one of the Planning Commission's regular meetings, which begins at 5:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 1201 Leopard Street. You are invited to attend this public hearing to express your views on this rezoning request. For more information, please call (361) 826-3240. TO BE ON RECORD, THIS FORM MUST BE FILLED OUT, SIGNED BY THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER(S) AND MAILED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, P. O. BOX 9277, CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78469- 9277. ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED BELOW BECOMES PUBLIC RECORD. NOTE: In accordance with the Planning Commission By -Laws, no discussion shall be held by a member or members of this Commission with an applicant or appellant concerning an application or appeal, either at home or office, or inperson, by telephone call or by letter. Printed Name: A /&y41d, 3 14gtey o Address: oZ) 2 S / 6P Att, ,%/ City/State: 61240,4)-5 { ) IN FAVOR 0.4 IN OPPOSITION Phone: 361-- /,g9, - PIP?, REASON: r 1 AJ-�lviry fir iv�'T� c c Wvuuy /r'T f _ (c.�es-. A< SEE MAP ON REVERSE SIDE Property Owner ID: 2 HTE# 1 6-1 000001 7 Case No. 0616-02 Project Manager: Dolores Wood AGENDA MEMORANDUM Public Hearing and First Reading for the City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of July 19, 2016 DATE: June 21, 2016 TO: Margie Rose, Interim City Manager FROM: Daniel McGinn, Interim Director, Development Services Department DanielMc@cctexas.com (361) 826-3595 Public Hearing and First Reading for Property at 1402 Agnes Street CAPTION: Case No. 0616-03 J.Z. Auto, LLC: A change of zoning from the "IL" Light Industrial District to the "CI" Intensive Commercial District. The property to be rezoned is described as Lots 15 and 16, Block 3, Chamberlin's Subdivision, located on the northwest corner of Agnes Street and 12th Street. PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to reduce setback requirements in order to allow expansion of an existing auto repair and servicing shop. RECOMMENDATION: Denial of the rezoning from the "IL" Light Industrial District to the "CI" Commercial Intensive District and, in lieu thereof, approval of the "CI/SP" Intensive Commercial District with a Special Permit subject to the following conditions: 1. Uses. The only uses authorized by this Special Permit other than those uses permitted by right in the "CI" Intensive Commercial base zoning district are the general repair of engines, transmissions, or radiators and the general repair or overhaul of air-conditioning systems, which are classified as "Vehicle Service, Heavy" uses. 2. Limitations. All vehicle service operations on the Property shall occur within an enclosed structure. 3. Time Limit. In accordance with the UDC, this Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within 12 months of this ordinance unless a complete building permit application has been submitted, and the Special Permit shall expire if the allowed use is discontinued for more than six consecutive months. Vote Results: For: Unanimous Opposed: 0 Abstained: 0 Absent: 0 BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: As detailed in the attached report, the applicant is requesting a rezoning from the "IL" Light Industrial District to the "CI" Intensive Commercial District to reduce setback requirements in order to allow installation of a new metal building for an existing vehicle service business. The applicant is proposing to expand its existing building, but with the limited area available on the site, the expansion can only occur toward the rear of the property and would need a zero -foot rear and side yard setback allowance. The rezoning to the "Cl" Intensive Commercial District, a zoning district often applied to properties in the Downtown Area, would eliminate the rear and side yard setback requirement and allow expansion of the existing building. Some of the services offered are categorized by the City's Unified Development Code ("UDC") as Heavy Vehicle Services as opposed to Limited Vehicle Services. Heavy Vehicle Services are not allowed in the "Cl" Intensive Commercial District but are allowed in the "IL" Light Industrial District. The proposed expansion of a vehicle service use that includes "Heavy" Vehicle Services, such as transmission, radiator, engine and air conditioning repair, is defined as a use requiring an "IL" Light Industrial District. A Special Permit to allow some of the "heavy" repair uses could be used to allow the use on the site and mitigate any negative effects that could occur to nearby commercial businesses and future residential uses. While the rezoning does not match the designation for medium density on the City's Comprehensive Plan, the rezoning to a less intensive district should be considered as beneficial to the long term transition to more residential or mixed-use development in this area near the downtown. Staff's opinion is that the vehicle service use at this location with some limited Heavy Vehicle Services would not decrease the residential desirability of this neighborhood, which is one of the findings required of the Comprehensive Plan when deciding which commercial uses to allow within designated residential areas. The applicant is in agreement with the Planning Commission and Staff recommendation for the "CI/SP" Intensive Commercial District with a Special Permit. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the rezoning to "CI/SP" Intensive Commercial District with a Special Permit as recommended by Staff and Planning Commission. 2. Approve the request to "CI" Intensive Commercial District. (requires 3/4 vote) 3. Deny the request. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not Applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Central Business Development Plan. The proposed rezoning to the "CI" Intensive Commercial District may help to transition this area away from incompatible industrial uses toward uses that are medium density residential or uses that are supportive of residential uses. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal and Planning Commission FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital • •Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015- 2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance for CI/SP Ordinance for CI Presentation - Aerial Map Planning Commission Final Report Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), upon application by Jerry Zamora on behalf of J.Z. Auto, LLC ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to Lots 15 and 16, Block 3, Chamberlin's Subdivision, from the "IL" Light Industrial District to the "CI/SP" Intensive Commercial District with a Special Permit; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its final report and recommendation regarding the application of Jerry Zamora on behalf of J.Z. Auto, LLC ("Owner"), for an amendment to the City of Corpus Christi's Unified Development Code ("UDC") and corresponding UDC Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, during a meeting of the Planning Commission when the Planning Commission recommended denial of the change of zoning from the "IL" Light Industrial District to the "Cl" Intensive Commercial District and, in lieu thereof, approval of the "CI/SP" Intensive Commercial District with a Special Permit subject to three conditions, and on Tuesday, July 12, 2016, during a meeting of the City Council, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve the public health, necessity, convenience and general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Upon application by Jerry Zamora on behalf of J.Z. Auto, LLC ("Owner"), the Unified Development Code ("UDC") of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas ("City"), is amended by changing the zoning on Lots 15 and 16, Block 3, Chamberlin's Subdivision, located on the northwest corner of Agnes Street and 12th Street (the "Property"), from the "IL" Light Industrial District to the "CI/SP" Intensive Commercial District with a Special Permit (Zoning Map No. 046044), as shown in Exhibit "A". Exhibit A, which is a map of the Property, is attached to and incorporated in this ordinance by reference as if fully set out herein in its entirety. SECTION 2. The Special Permit granted in Section 1 of this ordinance is subject to the Owner meeting the following conditions: 1. Uses. The only uses authorized by this Special Permit other than those uses permitted by right in the "Cl" Intensive Commercial base zoning district are the general repair of engines, transmissions, or radiators and the general repair or overhaul of air-conditioning systems, which are classified as "Vehicle Service, Heavy" uses. 2. Limitations. All vehicle service operations on the Property shall occur within an enclosed structure. 3. Time Limit. In accordance with the UDC, this Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within 12 months of this ordinance unless a complete building permit application has been submitted, and the Special Permit shall expire if the allowed use is discontinued for more than six consecutive months. SECTION 3. The official UDC Zoning Map of the City is amended to reflect changes made to the UDC by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 4. The UDC and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City, made effective July 1, 2011, and as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance, both remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. The City's Future Land Use Map, an element of the Comprehensive Plan, is amended to designate the Property for commercial land use. SECTION 6. All ordinances or parts of ordinances specifically pertaining to the zoning of the Property and that are in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 7. Publication shall be made in the City's official publication as required by the City's Charter. Page 2 of 3 The foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre The foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 20 ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor Ordinance_SP - J.Z. Auto, LLC Page 3 of 3 N C N a ry N N N 800AarY ST re Created: 5Y2• 018 4Prepa�JeremyM Department of Development Services CASE: 0616-03 SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH ZONING Subject Property RM -1 Multifamily 1 RM -2 Multifamily 2 RM -3 Multifamily 3 ON Professional Office RM -AT Multifamily AT CN -1 Neighborhoc-d Commercial CN -2 Neighborhood Commercial CR -1 Resort Commercial CR -2 CG -1 CG -2 CI CBD CR -3 FR H BP Resort Commercial General Com mercial General Commercial Intensive Commercial Downtown Commercial Resort Commercial Farrn Rural Historic Overlay Business Park IL Light Industrial IH Heavy Industrial PUD Planned Unit Dev. Overlay RS -10 Single -Family 10 R5-6 Single -Family 6 RS -4.5 Single -Family 4.5 RS -TF Two -Family RS -15 Single -Family 15 RE Residential Estate RS-TH Townhouse SP Special Permit RV Recreational Vehicle Park RMH Manufactured Nome LEOPARD AGNES SIIBdE&T PROPERTY z LOCATION MAP City of Corpus Christi Exhibit A Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), upon application by Jerry Zamora on behalf of J.Z. Auto, LLC ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to Lots 15 and 16, Block 3, Chamberlin's Subdivision, from the "IL" Light Industrial District to the "Cl" Intensive Commercial District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its final report and recommendation regarding the application of Jerry Zamora on behalf of J.Z. Auto, LLC ("Owner"), for an amendment to the City of Corpus Christi's Unified Development Code ("UDC") and corresponding UDC Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, during a meeting of the Planning Commission when the Planning Commission recommended denial of the change of zoning from the "IL" Light Industrial District to the "Cl" Intensive Commercial District and, in lieu thereof, approval of the "CI/SP" Intensive Commercial District with a Special Permit subject to three conditions, and on Tuesday, July 12, 2016, during a meeting of the City Council, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve the public health, necessity, convenience and general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Upon application by Jerry Zamora on behalf of J.Z. Auto, LLC ("Owner"), the Unified Development Code ("UDC") of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas ("City"), is amended by changing the zoning on Lots 15 and 16, Block 3, Chamberlin's Subdivision, located on the northwest corner of Agnes Street and 12th Street (the "Property"), from the "IL" Light Industrial District to the "Cl" Intensive Commercial District (Zoning Map No. 046044), as shown in Exhibit "A". Exhibit A, which is a map of the Property, is attached to and incorporated in this ordinance by reference as if fully set out herein in its entirety. SECTION 2. The official UDC Zoning Map of the City is amended to reflect changes made to the UDC by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 3. The UDC and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City, made effective July 1, 2011, and as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance, both remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. The City's Future Land Use Map, an element of the Comprehensive Plan, is amended to designate the Property for commercial land use. SECTION 5. All ordinances or parts of ordinances specifically pertaining to the zoning of the Property and that are in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 6. Publication shall be made in the City's official publication as required by the City's Charter. The foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre The foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this day of , 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 20 ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor Ordinance_CI - J.Z. Auto, LLC Page 2 of 2 N C N a ry N N N 800AarY ST re Created: 5Y2• 018 4Prepa�JeremyM Department of Development Services CASE: 0616-03 SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH ZONING Subject Property RM -1 Multifamily 1 RM -2 Multifamily 2 RM -3 Multifamily 3 ON Professional Office RM -AT Multifamily AT CN -1 Neighborhoc-d Commercial CN -2 Neighborhood Commercial CR -1 Resort Commercial CR -2 CG -1 CG -2 CI CBD CR -3 FR H BP Resort Commercial General Com mercial General Commercial Intensive Commercial Downtown Commercial Resort Commercial Farrn Rural Historic Overlay Business Park IL Light Industrial IH Heavy Industrial PUD Planned Unit Dev. Overlay RS -10 Single -Family 10 R5-6 Single -Family 6 RS -4.5 Single -Family 4.5 RS -TF Two -Family RS -15 Single -Family 15 RE Residential Estate RS-TH Townhouse SP Special Permit RV Recreational Vehicle Park RMH Manufactured Nome LEOPARD AGNES SIIBdE&T PROPERTY z LOCATION MAP City of Corpus Christi Exhibit A Aerial Overview 1 N Aerial Site Plan Agnes St. Existing Building 50'-1" x 68'-1" Proposed Addition Metal Building 50'-01/4"x 41'-5" Concrete Foundation Staff Recommendation Denial of the "CI" Intensive Commercial District And, in lieu thereof, Approval of the "CI/SP" Intensive Commercial District with a Special Permit subject to the following conditions: Special Permit Conditions 1. Uses. • "CI" Intensive Commercial District Uses • Repair of engines, transmissions, air-conditioning systems or radiators. 2. Limitations. All vehicle service operations on the Property shall occur within an enclosed structure. 3. Time Limit. • 12 months to submit a building permit application • Special Permit shall expire if the allowed uses are discontinued for more than six consecutive months. PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL REPORT Case No. 0616-03 HTE No. 16-10000018 Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 15, 2016 Applicant & Legal Description Owner: Jerry Zamora, JZ Auto LLC Representative: Michael Gunning Legal Description/Location: Lots 15 and 16, Block 3, Chamberlin's Subdivision, located on the northwest corner of Agnes Street and 12th Street. Zoning Request From: "IL" Light Industrial District To: "Cl" Intensive Commercial District Area: 0.14 acres Purpose of Request: To reduce setback requirements in order to allow expansion of an existing auto repair and servicing shop. Existing Zoning and Land Uses Existing Zoning District Existing Land Use Future Land Use Site "IL" Light Industrial Commercial Medium Density Residential North "IL" Light Industrial Commercial Medium Density Residential South "IL" Light Industrial Commercial Medium Density Residential East "IL" Light Industrial Commercial High Density Residential West "IL" Light Industrial Commercial Medium Density Residential ADP, Map & Violations Area Development Plan: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Central Business Development Plan and is planned for medium density residential uses. The proposed rezoning to the "Cl" Intensive Commercial District is not exactly consistent with the adopted Future Land Use Map or the Central Business Development Plan but the proposed rezoning is consistent with the plan's direction to transition away from industrial uses that are incompatible with residential uses. Map No.: 046044 Zoning Violations: None Transportation Transportation and Circulation: The subject property has approximately 50 feet of street frontage along Agnes Street, which is an "A2" Secondary Arterial Divided street and 125 feet of frontage on 12th Street, which is classified as a Local Residential street. Planning Commission Final Report Page 2 Street R.O.W. Street Urban Transportation Plan Type Proposed Section Existing Section Traffic Volume Agnes Street "A2" Secondary Arterial Divided N/A 60' ROW 45' paved N/A 12th Street Local Residential 50' ROW 28' paved 60' ROW 40' paved N/A Staff Summary: Requested Zoning: The applicant is requesting a rezoning from the "IL" Light Industrial District to the "Cl" Intensive Commercial District to reduce setback requirements in order to allow installation of a new metal building for an existing vehicle service business called ZAM Automotive and Transmission Repair ("ZAM"). Development Plan: The subject property is currently zoned "IL" Light Industrial District. The "IL" District has setback requirements of 20 -foot front and corner yards, five-foot side yards and a 10 -foot rear yard, as opposed to the "Cl" District which has no setback requirements. The former Zoning Ordinance, which pre -dates the UDC, did not require a rear or side yard setback in the Industrial zoning districts. Like the existing building on the subject property, it is not uncommon to find buildings in the industrial zoning districts built with zero side or rear yard setbacks. The applicant is proposing to expand its existing building, but with the limited area available on the site, the expansion can only occur toward the rear of the property and would need a zero -foot rear yard setback allowance. The rezoning to the "Cl" Intensive Commercial District, a zoning district often applied to properties in the Downtown Area, would eliminate the rear yard setback requirement and allow expansion of the existing building. Additionally, the existing building was built without side yard setbacks. A rezoning to the "Cl" District would bring the building into compliance with regard to side yard setback requirements. The building expansion would create the ability for the applicant to conduct all automotive repairs inside the building. The proposed flow of automobiles would enter on 1 2th Street and exit onto Agnes Street. Parking is already provided off-site on the adjacent property to the north. ZAM offers the following services: general auto repair, repair of radiators and air- conditioning systems, installation of remanufactured engines and transmissions, diagnosis of check engine lights, complete computer diagnostics, complete safety analysis, tune-ups, oil changes, brake system repairs, steering and suspension systems repairs, and alignments. ZAM does not do body work, any kind of painting services, or build transmissions or engines. Some of these services are categorized by the City's Unified Development Code ("UDC") as Heavy Vehicle Services as opposed to Limited Vehicle Services. Heavy Vehicle Services are not allowed in the "Cl" Intensive Commercial District but are allowed in the "IL" Light Industrial District. Existing Land Uses & Zoning: The subject property is zoned "IL" Light Industrial and consists of an automotive repair shop that offers heavy and limited vehicle services. The surrounding properties are also zoned as the "IL" Light Industrial District. To the north is Planning Commission Final Report Page 3 a lot for parking that is leased by ZAM Automotive. To the east and west are commercial uses. To the south across Agnes St. is Flash Auto Body Shop, a heavy vehicle service use. AICUZ: The subject property is not located in one of the Navy's Air Installation Compatibility Use Zones (AICUZ). Comprehensive Plan & Area Development Plan Consistency: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Central Business Development Plan. The proposed rezoning to the "Cl" Intensive Commercial District may help to transition this area away from incompatible industrial uses toward uses that are medium density residential or uses that are supportive of residential uses. Additionally, the following are pertinent elements of the Comprehensive Plan and should be considered: - Plan land uses appropriately for current and future populations and support future development by making a variety of land uses available, while working to ensure compatibility between existing and future land uses, existing and planned infrastructure, and existing natural resources. (Central Business Development Plan, OBJECTIVE LU 1) - With exception to the industrial use areas permitted and depicted on the Central Business Future Land Use map, new industrial uses and outside storage uses shall be discouraged within the Plan Boundary, and existing industrial zoning or land use changes to another or expanded industrial use shall be discouraged. (Central Business Development Plan, Policy LU 1.4) - Expansion of commercial uses into or within residential areas may be permitted only if such expansion maintains or improves the residential desirability of the impacted neighborhood. (Comprehensive Plan, Commercial Policy Statement d) - Commercial Service Areas designed to serve local neighborhoods should be conveniently located and in harmony with the surrounding neighborhood. (Comprehensive Plan, Commercial Policy Statement g). Plat Status: The subject property is comprised of two platted lots. Department Comments: • While the rezoning does not match the designation for medium density on the City's Comprehensive Plan, the rezoning to a less intensive district should be considered as beneficial to the long term transition to more residential and mixed-use development in this area near the downtown. • Based on the lot configuration, the area appears to have been originally platted for residential development in 1891. At some point after the 1900s, the Tex Mex Railroad extended a rail line to the area (one block to the north) which spurred industrial development. In the last 20 years, the Tex Mex Railroad tracks were removed. • This area should be considered as being in transition toward residential or residential support uses as all of the uses on the block are commercial or residential. Only the underlying zoning of the area is "IL" Light Industrial. This block maybe be a good candidate for a city -initiated rezoning to more closely match the commercial nature of the area and to prevent any new incompatible industrial uses that could interfere with the long term transition to residential in the area. Planning Commission Final Report Page 4 • Auto repair uses provide a service-oriented use to support nearby residential neighborhoods and future potential residential redevelopment. • The proposed expansion of a vehicle service use that includes "Heavy" Vehicle Services, such as transmission, radiator, engine and air conditioning repair, is defined as a use requiring an "IL" Light Industrial District. A Special Permit to allow some of the "heavy" repair uses could be used to allow the use on the site and mitigate any negative effects that could occur to nearby commercial businesses and future residential uses. • Staff's opinion is that the vehicle service use at this location with some limited Heavy Vehicle Services would not decrease the residential desirability of this neighborhood, which is one of the findings required of the Comprehensive Plan when deciding which commercial uses to allow within designated residential areas. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation: Denial of the rezoning from the "IL" Light Industrial District to the "Cl" Commercial Intensive District and, in lieu thereof, approval of the "CI/SP" Intensive Commercial District with a Special Permit subject to the following conditions: 1. Uses. The only uses authorized by this Special Permit other than those uses permitted by right in the "Cl" Intensive Commercial base zoning district are the general repair of engines, transmissions, or radiators and the general repair or overhaul of air-conditioning systems, which are classified as "Vehicle Service, Heavy" uses. 2. Limitations. All vehicle service operations on the Property shall occur within an enclosed structure. 3. Time Limit. In accordance with the UDC, this Special Permit shall be deemed to have expired within 12 months of this ordinance unless a complete building permit application has been submitted, and the Special Permit shall expire if the allowed use is discontinued for more than six consecutive months. Vote Results: For: Unanimous Against: 0 Absent: 0 Planning Commission Final Report Page 5 Public Notification Number of Notices Mailed — 17 within 200 -foot notification area 4 outside notification area As of June 21, 2016: In Favor — 0 inside notification area — 0 outside notification area In Opposition — 0 inside notification area — 0 outside notification area Totaling 0.00% of the land within the 200 -foot notification area in opposition. Attachments: 1. Location Map (Existing Zoning & Notice Area) 2. Site Plan 3. Plat 4. Application 5. Public Comments Received (if any) K:\DevelopmentSvcs\SHARED\ZONING CASES \2016\0616-03 J.Z. Auto, LLC (Michael Gunning)\Council Documents\Report - J.Z. Auto.docx CASE: 0616-03 ZONING & NOTICE AREA RM -1 Multifamily 1 RM -2 Multifamily 2 RM -3 Multifamily 3 ON Professional Office RM -AT Multifamily AT CN -1 Neighborhood Commercial CN -2 Neighborhood Commercial CR -1 CR -2 CG -1 CG -2 Cl COD CR -3 FR H BP Resort Commercal Resort Commercial General Commercial General Corn me rcia I intensive Commercial Downtown Commercial ResortCam me rci a I Farm Rural Historic Overlay Business Park IL Light Industrial IH Heavy Industrial PUD Planned Unit Dev. Overlay RS -10 Single -Family 10 RS -6 Single -Family 8 RS -4.5 Single -Family 4.5 RS -TF Two -Family RS -15 Single -Family 10 RE Residential Estate RS-TH Townhouse SP Special Permit RV Recreational Vehicle Park RMH Manufactured Home 1-7 Subject Property 0 Owners wrh 200' buffer if] favor 4 Owne s within 200' Ilsted on y Owners attached ownership tabte A in opposition CHANNEL LEOPARD SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION MAP City of Corpus Christi Au-lOwitrriuc 1 P-/-oE Ac -Es AGE S 1 Lu r b s d v- -•— fl 1 E5±cJ V11%1 0) 0=1 6,S ro Met., 1 5-0 "x i= 5/' • , . I 1—.(2,1Cr t-0 • ; sce. ..,,,,i eert,- i , • 1 '. 1144______ ---- : T E 2-I6-/‘• l:2 "C) t -•e4 f Lf70 re. I. f Ut, es-rec- 613Me;rifri1 A--Lvetien Corpils h NW 1 1 vif 1vt I ULAN 'S SUB -61.,510N TO CORPUS CHRISTI zees. rlillill��r ,i A 4NES TIIIr1-11i1 I �1 �:i .MARGUERITE �i L. H lila � 6E1 IT11111 d it 11111 C u _'i,1[hl� I I ( L11. l .1 )h� iLr[i, 14;,ILL, 11,34 � ['� ,'� ''' 'V 'I FIcl .L 21 it it 111 iid 4 '[1 jL (-r Ii.,iJ.Lf,_ i;id lL�„I>�. 11s t — 1 ^i1,1:144P77 ITTI , 11, la..L7.,,. 7-1 , — T, *f ,I 'J� i�iI T >yeF w Ao.ie9z�� - r� M 11l TT r�51 1 u L_IL� f 11 ' ” 1L lA ?c.a Biu' r a A GE' .4..• ,. - /.4 444 2,44 -F ary o Fc (i./ - of —/[Javvu / 6 GyUS cos, 41, 4, r a-,^ _,� r•0 h - • 1852 Development Services Dept. P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469.9277 �(361)826-3240 2 Locat01 $ treet REZONING APPLICATION Office Use Only At !i. t 20 w z b = m crtb 1.3 tb= , — rn* 3 Fy 0 4~0 y 0 � m 3 1, m0 G o brn rn .r C o _1 33 A a 3 x zi --132 Applicant, J ; Z /71i i 0 - Z o; Ontact Person : _ r� . Mailing Address: / q 0 Z 4�' ? r I -7/s' -ti State: i X ZIP: Phone: (? 6 / ) fq,61 ,q,61 7-84606 City: r i f S C -h r7 E-mail: Cell: (.?G>' ) Ft, - P) 4 g 1 2. PropertyOwner(s): ��rr^ 2, 2 M O'✓la- Contact Person :41_ t k e J G LANA,/� Coit - 3 41, 7 1, 1, `73e f 1 Mailing Address: ) 4 Z // ,2 ‹' r ( e''1- �9 City: (L f i. 4 r. 2) State: /Y ZIP:l d 4 0 / Phone: ( 36b () c i'7 - $ b 06 irfir . E-mail: Cell: (`3(/ ) 7 65 - Q 42/ 3. Subject Property Add : / 4 0 /9 P ` Area of Request (SF/acres): G; 2550 S IL Current Zoning Use: iT 2/G s %I7/ '%4 *8/P poossed Zoning & Use: 1 (Gd 1i/ e ✓G 2._ fi ---'9 _190 R y -{i ref4r /- 12 -Digit Nueces County Tax ID: L f 1 2- 0 _Q D 3- f2 L �� Subdivision Name (i4 ea/n De r ! / 4_S S ra f4 /11/1 4/ a (7 Block: 3 Lot(s): / f 0 1 La Legal Description if not platted: 4. Sub ittal Requirements_ � a IC2, ��ErEEarly Assistance Meeting: Date Held , /4 ; with City Staff %F7/0/re)/ U4d s IF ❑ ■ ❑" � Land Use Statement 0 Disclosure of interest APPLICABLE: Peak Hour Trip Form (if request is inconsistent with Future Land Metes & Bounds Description with exhibit if property includes un -platted Appointment of Agent Form if landowner is not signing this form Ifil Use r Copy of Warranty Deed Plan) land (sealed by ■ RPLS) , r /i/119u&/ "Frrre5 , '2ri97 P' Site Plan for PUD or Special Permit 0 Lien Holder Authorization I certify that I have provided the City of Corpus Christi with a complete application for review; that I am authorized to initiate this rezoning as or on behalf of the Property Owner(s), and the information provided is accurate. , `---- { Owner or Agent's Signature ApKb Sight- Owner or Agent's PnName Applicant's PrintedName Office Use Only Date Received: - `IT......." --0.4- Received By fJ / 0 ADP: a) Rezoning Fee / / a % . 50 + PUD Fee p + Sign Fee * 0 0 = Total Fee i l l e7 7. 5 0 No Signs Required 2-@ $10/sign Sign Posting Date: KADEVEIDPuENTsVcssHAREDILANODEVELOPIENMPPLICATION FOR1A51RFZONINGIZONINO APPLICATION 2016. LAND USE STATEMENT 1. State the purpose of the request and include applicable background information as to the development plan for the property, i.e., usage of property, number and square footage(s) of existing and/or proposed building(s)/unit(s), building(s)/unit(s) height, parking plans/spaces, phasing schedule of development, number of employee(s) associated with the office, business or industrial development, hours of operation, modification or demolition plans for existing structure(s), type, area and setback of signage, etc. Purpose: To install new metal building to rear of property to contain all repair and auto services indoors. Two to three additional lifts will be added to accommodate a more efficient operation. Zam's Automotive employs five persons. Hours of operation are from 8-5 Monday through Friday. The metal building allows the owner to enclose the existing services inside and allow a more efficient flow of autos entering on 12th Street and exiting on Agnes Street. Current Use: Auto Repair Proposed Use: Same (no expansion) Existing Blvd: 3,500 sq. ft. Proposed Bldg: 2,000 sq. ft. 2. Identify the existing land uses adjoining the area of request: North - IL - Electric Supply Dist. South - IL - Auto Body Shop East - IL - Automotive Repair Shop West - IL - Automotive Repair Shop C IUSERSTIANyAR.00uDESKTOPIDAILY USMANNMAILAND USE STATEMENT FOR ZONING. DOC APPOINTMENT OF AGENT As owner of the subject property, I hereby appoint the person designated below to act for me, as my agent in this request. Name of Agent: 1 ii.e" (2 C-7/ l f i / // /�?i r re� G1'! C ;- lir . Mailing Address: C � � � �( City: 61 pr A CA t<1 S1/. 5tatc: /i K75 Zip: 7f 41 Home Phone: (3I )P2- te? 2— Business Phone: ,IcW-f Cell: aW )737-7 31-7 I acknowledge and affirm that I will be legally bound by the words and acts of my agent, and by my signature below, I fully authorize my agent to: Be the point of contact between myself and the City of Corpus Christi; make legally binding representations of fact and commitments of every kind on my behalf; grant legally binding waivers of rights and releases of liabilities of every kind on my behalf; consent to legally binding modifications; conditions, and exceptions on my behalf; and, to execute documents on my behalf which are legally binding on me. I understand that the City of Corpus Christi will deal only with a fully authorized agent. At any time it should appear that my agent has less than full authority to act, then the application may be suspended and I will have to personally participate in the disposition of the application. I understand that all communications related to this application arc part of an official proceeding of City government and, that the City will rely upon statements made by my agent. Therefore, I agree to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Corpus Christi, its officers, agents, employees, and third parties who act in reliance upon my agent's words and actions from all damages, attorney fees, interest and costs arising from this matter. If my property is owned by a corporation, partnership, venture, or other legal entity, then I certify that I have the legal authority to make this binding appointment on behalf of the entity, and every reference herein to "I", "my", or "me" is a reference to the entity. • *Signature of Agent:r/GAG 4 Title: Printed/Typed Name of Agent:/( f (! ( t *Signature of Property Owner: ��Printed/i'ypcd Name of Property a er. erf24-41•fre.—Date:'//'//.(6 - 11/14/.') Title: Ca—'i *Signature of Property Owner: Title: PrintediTyped Name of Property Owner: Date: *Signature of Property Owner: Title: Printed/Typed Name of Property Owner: Date: *Application must be signed by the individual applicant, each partner of a partnership, or by an authorized officer of a corporation or association. D.w.IlrownAPPOINTMGNr OF AGENr2-19-09.doc DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every Question must be answered If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". NAME:, STREET: ; L ' c ru FIRM is:°Corporation °Partnership Y CITY: Co+r'6u5 e h, atr ©Sole Owner °Association OOther. ZIP: `%a DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Board, Commission, or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Consultant CERTIFICATE I cerci that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of anyinformationrequested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: -- ' r r `"1 6, Fi (Print Name) Signature of Certifying Person: Date: S ' - K1DEVEWPMENTSVCSSHARE(N.AND DEVELOP1 JTULPPIJCAT)NN EZONING1DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS STATEMENT 5 122015 DOC AGENDA MEMORANDUM Public Hearing/1St Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of June 21, 2016 2nd Reading Ordinance for City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 DATE: 6/6/2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, Acting City Manager THRU: E. Jay Ellington, Interim Assistant City Manger JayEll@cctexas.com 361-826-3042 FROM: Rudy Bentancourt, Housing and Community Development Director RudyB@cctexas.com 361-826-3021 Public Hearing/1St Reading Ordinance regarding the City of Corpus Christi's proposed FY2016-2017 Consolidated Annual Action Plan. CAPTION: Ordinance to adopt the fiscal year (FY) 2016-2017 Consolidated Annual Action Plan (CAAP), for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and the HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Programs. To authorize the City Manager or designee to submit the FY2016-2017 CAAP to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and to amend if required by HUD. To authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept and appropriate upon receipt the grants from HUD into the Grant Fund No. 1059 for the approved FY2016-2017 CAAP projects and further to execute funding agreements and all other documents necessary to implement the FY2016-2017 CAAP with organizations of approved projects. PURPOSE: Purpose of Public Hearing is to meet HUD requirements and to provide a "Citizen Comment Period" for citizens to provide comments on the proposed project funding for the FY2016-2017 CAAP; the Ordinance will include the adoption of the proposed CAAP. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulation requires, as part of the approved process for the FY2013-FY2017 Consolidated Plan/Citizens Participation Plan, two (2) public hearings prior to the adoption of the FY2016-2017 CAAP. An initial public hearing was held at the City of Corpus Christi's City Hall on February 2, 2016. A second public hearing to receive additional input was held on February 8, 2016. The public hearing to be conducted on Tuesday, June 21, 2016 by the City of Corpus Christi's City Council will satisfy the requirement of the two required hearings, though three public hearings were held. The City of Corpus Christi has received official notification from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) of the FY2016-2017 funding allocation for the following programs. $2,404,066 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) $221,468 Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) $868,482 HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) It is important to note that for FY2016-2017, CDBG will experience a 2.28% reduction, ESG will experience a 2.92% reduction, and HOME will experienced a 3.67% increase from prior year funding, based on the entitlement funding which will be received from HUD. An additional $1,000,000 generated from the Revolving Rehabilitation Loan Program will be made available to the CDBG Program for the continued self -funding of affordable housing programs. Additionally, $55,000 generated from Program Income for the Demolition Liens Program will be made available to the CDBG Program for continued funding of this program. Additional funding in the amount of $419,435 which was recaptured from previously funded projects that were unspent, have been made available to be reprogrammed to augment funding levels for the upcoming FY2016-2017 CDBG program allocations for a total funding level of $3,878,501. Since 1975, the City of Corpus Christi has received funding for its CDBG Programs in excess of 174.1 million, of which approximately 20.9 million has been income generated by various programs administered by the Housing and Community Development Department. The ESG Program will have an allocation amount of $221,468 for FY2016-2017. The intent of the ESG Program is to provide funding to providers of Homeless services to support the efforts of Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re -Housing activities. Homeless Prevention activities assist individuals and families who are currently homeless but are at high risk of becoming homeless "but for" this assistance. Rapid Re -Housing activities assist those individuals and families with rapidly rehousing those who are homeless back into permanent housing "but for" this assistance. Commencing in 1987, the City of Corpus Christi has received in excess of $4.1 million in funding for ESG services. The HOME Program will have an allocation amount of $868,482 as a funding level from entitlement funds to be received, with an additional $350,000 being made available for reprogramming from previously funded recaptured program funds for a preliminary estimated funding amount of $1,218,482 for the FY2016-2017 Budget Year. The HOME Program was initiated in 1992 with the mandate to increase and improve affordable housing opportunities; HOME funds totaling $36.7 million have been utilize to fund Rental and Home Ownership programs in addition to the rehabilitation and reconstruction of affordable housing within the City of Corpus Christi. Of the $36.7 million in HOME funding, approximately $4.6 million of those funds have been made available from previous loans as generated program income; these funds have been utilized to augment available funding. The FY2016 CAAP represents the fourth annual action plan of the developed five-year (FY2013-FY2017) Consolidated Plan and is the application for HUD for funding for the CDBG, ESG, and HOME Programs. The FY2016 CAAP describes the activities and projects to be assisted with funds received under CDBG, ESG, HOME, and other HUD/Non-HUD programs that help to meet housing and community developed objectives. The Housing and Community Development Department adopted a timeline that provides for public hearings during Technical Assistance Workshops which were held on February 2, and February 8, 2016 to be followed by the City Council public hearing on June 21, 2016. Citizens' public comment period begins on June 20, 2016 and ends July 20, 2016, for the FY2016 CAAP. Subsequently, adoption of the CAAP is scheduled for July 12, 2016, allowing timely submission of the program to HUD. The proposed FY2016 CAAP has been developed according to HUD regulations. Staff will be making a brief presentation to the City Council at the opening of the Public Hearing so that staff may outline the FY2016-2017 CAAP's eligibility criteria for the programs and staff's recommendations. Housing and Community Development held five Technical Assistance Workshops on January 7, 2016 and February 2 (two designated times), 8, and 17, 2016, and two Technical Assistance Workshops which included a Public Hearing on February 2 and 8, 2016. Also held were two Neighborhood Meetings, in conjunction with Technical Assistance Workshops, on February 8 and 17, 2016 at Corpus Christi City Hall. The public hearing date with City Council was also disclosed at this time. The FY2016-2017 Consolidated Annual Action Plan will be submitted to HUD on August 12, 2016 following the required 30 day citizen comment period. ALTERNATIVES: None OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Public Hearing is required per HUD Regulations. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: This item is non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal Finance — Federal Grants and Office of Management and Budget FINANCIAL IMPACT: Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None RECOMMENDATION: At the conclusion of public hearing, the City Council may, at their discretion, discuss any and all recommendations and provide direction on the projects/activities to be funded under the FY2016-2017 CAAP LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Presentation CDBG Attachment D FY2016-2017 ESG Attachment D FY2016-2017 HOME Attachment D FY2016-2017 Ordinance to adopt the fiscal year (FY) 2016-2017 Consolidated Annual Action Plan (CAAP), for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), the Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and the HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Programs; to authorize the City Manager or designee to submit the FY2016-2017 CAAP to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and to amend if required by HUD; to authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept and appropriate upon receipt the grants from HUD into the Grant Fund No. 1059 for the approved FY2016-2017 CAAP projects and further to execute funding agreements and all other documents necessary to implement the FY2016-2017 CAAP with organizations for approved projects. Whereas, with proper notice to the public and in accordance with HUD regulations, three public hearings were held, the first and second on February 2 and 8, 2016, and the third during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers on Tuesday, June 21, 2016. All hearings were held at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and Whereas, the City Council has determined that this Ordinance would best serve public health, necessity, convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. Now therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas: Section 1. That the FY2016-2017 CAAP, which includes the CDBG, the ESG, and the HOME Programs, is adopted. Section 2. That the City Manager or the City Manager's designee is authorized: • to submit the FY2016-2017 CAAP to HUD, and • to amend the FY2016-2017 CAAP if required by HUD. Section 3. That the City Manager or the City Manager's designee is authorized: • to execute all documents necessary to accept and appropriate upon receipt the grants from HUD into the Grant Fund No. 1059 for the approved FY2016-2017 CAAP, and • to execute funding agreements and all other documents necessary to implement the FY2016-2017 CAAP with organizations for approved projects. @BCL@800695DC That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2016, by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Chad Magill Rudy Garza Colleen McIntyre Mark Scott Michael Hunter Brian Rosas Lucy Rubio Carolyn Vaughn That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2016, by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Chad Magill Rudy Garza Colleen McIntyre Mark Scott Michael Hunter Brian Rosas Lucy Rubio Carolyn Vaughn PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 2016 at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary @BCL@800695DC Nelda Martinez Mayor CITY COUNCIL - Public Hearing/ 1st Reading Ordinance Staff Recommendations for the FY2016-2017 CAAP City Council June 21, 2016 Staff Recommendations - CDBG FY2016 City Departments • HCD - CDBG Program Administration (Community Development - $460,000 • HCD - Rehabilitation Services (Housing Division) - $847,000 • HCD - Minor Home Repair Grant Program - $200,000 • HCD - Single Family Rehabilitation - $800,000 • HCD - Appliance Replacement Grant Program - $200,000 • Parks and Recreation - Sacky Park Improvements - $184,469 • Parks and Recreation - Ben Garza Park Improvements - $200,000 • Police - Code Enforcement Program - $307,032 • Police - Demolition Program - $100,000 • Police - Clearance of Vacant Properties Program - $100,000 Staff Recommendations - CDBG FY2016 Non -Profit Agencies • Boys and Girls Club of the Coastal Bend - $200,000 • Catholic Charities of Corpus Christi - $150,000 • Corpus Christi Hope House - $130,000 Staff Recommendations - ESG FY2016 • City of Corpus Christi - ESG Admin Cost - $16,468 • Catholic Charities of CC - $30,000 • Corpus Christi Hope House - $30,000 • South Texas Substance Abuse Recovery Services, Inc. (STSARS) - $30,000 • Corpus Christi Metro Ministries - $30,000 • The Salvation Army - $30,000 Staff Recommendations - HOME FY2016 HOME Administration/Technical Assistance - Homebuyer Assistance Program - 200,000 Veterans Minor Home Repair Program - • Habitat for Humanity - 200,000 86,848 250,000 • Affordable Housing Project/Program - 5250,000 • HOME Program Set-aside funds - 5231,634 QUESTIONS? ATTACHMENT"D" CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI FY2016 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN RECOMMENDED FY2016 CDBG PROGRAM FY2016 CDBG Allocation Reprogrammed Funds Program Income from Demolition Liens Program Income from Rehabilitation Program (Revolving Loan Fund estimate) TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR FY2016 CDBG PROGRAM $2,404,066 $419,435 $55,000 $1,000,000 $3,878,501 # PROJECT & DESCRIPTION Staff Recommendation City Council Adopt 1 HCD - CDBG Program Administration This project will fund 5.25 FTE staff salaries and administrative costs: 1 Administrator, 1.75 -Sr. Management Assistants (1 at 100% and 1 at .75%), and 2 -Contract Administrators (1 at 100% and 1 at 50%). Staff is responsible for administering the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), the HOME Investment Partnership (HOME), and Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) Programs. Staff interprets CDBG, HOME, and ESG federal regulations, conducts public hearings/meetings, reviews proposed projects and activities to determine funding and eligibility, monitors subrecipients for program compliance, provides technical assistance, conducts environmental assessments of funding projects/activities, and enforces Davis Bacon Federal wage rate requirements. The amount indicates 19% of allowed 20% of administrative costs. $460,000 2 HCD - Rehabilitation Services This is the operating budget for 16 FTE staff that service the various housing programs administered by HCD: 1 -Director (at 60%), 2 -Program Managers, 4 -Property Advisors, 4 -Loan Officers, 1 -Mortgage Servicing Aide, 1-Managment Assistant (at 40%), 1-Managment Aide, and 2 Sr. Staff Assistants. The staff manage and administer the Single Family Rehabilitation Loan Program, Minor Home Repair Grant Program, Appliance Replacement Grant Program, Veterans Minor Home Repair Grant Program, Veterans Single Family Rehabilitation Loan Program, Homebuyer Assistance Program, the Type A Homebuyer Program, and Mortgage Servicing which manages the servicing of 800 loans provided through the Single Family Rehabilitation Loan Program. Services include collection of loan payments, escrowing of insurance and property taxes, payment of insurance and property taxes, preparing end of year escrow analysis, and providing release of liens on loans that are paid off. Services provided include applicant in -take, loan processing, loan settlement, Homebuyer Education, construction monitoring, project estimating, and development of specifications and drawings. $847,000 3 HCD - Minor Home Repair Grant Program Minor repair grants up to $15,000 for repairs which include lead based paint testing as required by HUD regulations on houses built prior to 1978 . Repairs consist of roof repairs, plumbing electrical, heating, and minor structural repairs. Lead based activities may include actual work or testing required to meet the lead based paint requirements. Assistance through this program is provided to very low income homeowners who are 62 years old or older or disabled. Program Income - $200,000 $200,000 1 # PROJECT & DESCRIPTION Staff Recommendation City Council Adopt 4 HCD - Single Family Rehabilitation The Single Family Rehabilitation Loan Program benefits only low- and very low-income homeowners. The Program provides zero percent and three percent interest loans to homeowners interested in rehabilitating their homes. Funds requested will be used to provide rehabilitation and reconstruction loans; demolition grants; relocation grants and lead base paint grants for remedial activities. Rehabilitation Loan Program. Program Income - $800,000 $800,000 5 HUD - Appliance Replacement Grant Program The Appliance Replacement Grant Program is designed to provide energy efficient appliances for low- and very low-income homeowners. Eligible applicants will be homeowners already income and program approved and receiving assistance from the Single Family Rehabilitation Program. The grant will provide up to $6,000 per home which will cover the installation of energy efficient top load washer/dryer, refrigerator, and oven, as well as the removal of the existing non-working or energy affiriant annlianras $200,000 6 Parks and Recreations - Sacky Park Improvements The Sacky Park Improvements Project will include the construction of a new playground to serve youth ages 2-12 years old, outdoor fitness equipment for teens and adults, new park benches and picnic tables, trees and a split rail fence around the perimeter of the park to protect the improvements and to prevent access by vehicles. The department will work with a playground and park amenity manufactuer to provide and install all of the improvements. $184,469 Parks and Recreation - Ben Garza Park Improvements The Ben Garza Park Improvments Project will include the improvement of two existing youth baseball/softball fields, outdoor fitness equipment for teens and adults, new park benches and picnic tables, trees and a split rail fence around the perimeter of the park to protect the improvements and prevent access by vehicles. The department will work with a playground and park amenity manufacturer to provide and install all of the structural improvements and a landscape company for the improvements to the ballfields and trees. The park is listed as a major investment park for the 2012 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. As use of the park improves and neighbors are encouraged to connect with each other, it can serve as a base line for combating crime in the area. The department will also partner with the Police Athletic League to schedule games and practices at the ballfields. $200,000 8 Police - Code Enforcement Program The Code Enforcement request is to fund staffing for salaries to support 6 full time employees (FTE's): 5-Code Enforcement Property Advisors (100%) and 1- Senior Account Clerk/Administrative Support (100%) which includes a total of $307,032. Funding will be for salaries and approximately $10,000 for training through classes, seminars and/or conferences for education opportunities, and for certifications required for code enforcement. The CE Property Advisors are responsible for the inspection of properties within CDBG eligible areas for violations of approximately seventy-five (75) health, safety, and welfare related City Codes. All CDBG eligible census tracts in the city meet, per Resolution, HUD's criteria for a deteriorating area and meet the national objective of serving the low income citizens. The Senior Account Clerk provides administrative support to the Code Enforcement Property Advisors by processing compliance requests through the mail and researching property owner's name and address. $307,032 2 # PROJECT & DESCRIPTION Staff Recommendation City Council Adopt 9 Police - Demolition Program This program consists of the demolition of substandard structures determined to be health and safety issues and 51% or more deterioration of the general structure. The demolition of these structures is an abatement measure as deemed necessary by the Building Code and Public Safety Officials. The removal of unsafe structures is a priority for neighborhood revitalization within the community and as a goal established by City Council for livable neighborhoods. Each structure will be assessed and surveyed as building case, providing the property owner an opportunity to resolve the substandard conditions within the parameters of the City's Building Codes. The substandard structures will be demolished under the authority of a judge's ruling via Environmental Municipal Court and the Demolition Grant Program that allows the property owner to voluntarily agree to have their structure demolished. Program Income: $55,000 $100,000 10 Police - Clearance of Vacant Properties Program This project consists of clearance of vacant properties in regards to the removal of accumulation of litter and solid waste and the mowing of high weeds and dangerous weeds; to include, abatement of unsightly and unsanitary matter in all CDBG eligible areas. The City may charge an abatement cost and place a lien against the properties to cover the cost incurred. $100,000 3 # PROJECT & DESCRIPTION Staff Recommendation City Council Adopt CDBG NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS Request Staff Recomm Boys & Girls Club of the Coastal Bend Funds requested will renovate a current exercise room into a Teen Center and install an HVAC system; install fire monitoring system, install bleachers in the gym, and repave the front parking lot. $200,000 $200,000 2 Catholic Charities of Corpus Christi Funds requested are for the construction of two concrete accessible concrete ramps, parking and a gate for the newly relocated Catholic Charities of Corpus Christi. The main ramp will be 700 sq. ft. and the second ramp will be 300 sq. ft. $150,000 $150,000 3 Corpus Christi Hope House Funds requested will renovate handicapped entrance to the office with a non -slip covering; remove/replace drywall in throughout shelter; remove damaged floors/replace floors in office/office bathroom and replace floors in Apartments 2 and 3; upgrade all doorknobs and locks for safety; upgrade perimeter fencing for security/safety; and renovate garage in a laundry room for clients with handicap accessibility. Capital Contribution: $20,000 $130,000 $130,000 Total Non -Profit $480,000 $480,000 $0 Total City Projects $3,398,501 $3,398,501 $0 Overall Total $3,878,501 $3,878,501 $0 4 ATTACHMENT"D" RECOMMENDED FY2016 EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT (ESG) PROGRAM FY2016 ESG Allocation $221,468 # PROJECT & DESCRIPTION Request Staff Recomm City Council Adopt 1 City of Corpus Christi - ESG Administrative Cost Administrative Cost is being requested to fund a staff person at .50 FTE for the overall administration of the Emergency Solutions Grant Program. These functions include the financial oversight, compliance, and technical assistance components of the program. $16,468 $16,468 2 Catholic Charities of Corpus Christi Funding requested for the ESG Activity Component of Homeless Prevention -Case Management and short- and medium-term rental assistance. $30,000 $30,000 3 Corpus Christi Hope House Funding requested for the ESG Activity Components of Homeless Prevention -Case Management and short and medium term rental assistance; and Rapid Re -housing Case Management and short and medium term assistance. $30,000 $30,000 4 South Texas Substance Abuse Recovery Services, Inc. (STSARS) Funding requested for the ESG Activity Component of Homeless Prevention -Case Management and short- and medium-term rental assistance. $30,000 $30,000 5 Corpus Christi Metro Ministries Funding requested for the ESG Activity Components of Homeless Prevention -Case Management and short- and medium term rental assistance; and Rapid Re -housing -Case Management and short - and medium term assistance. $30,000 $30,000 6 The Salvation Army Funding requested for the ESG Activity Components of Homeless Prevention -Case Management and short- and medium term rental assistance; and Rapid Re -housing -Case Management and short - and medium term assistance. $30,000 $30,000 Overall Total** $166,468 $166,468 $0 ** $55,000 has been set-aside from FY2016 to be associated with a resource for Homelessness 1 ATTACHMENT "0" RECOMMENDED FY2016 HOME PROGRAM FY2016 HOME Allocation $868,482 Reprogrammed Funds $350,000 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR FY2016 HOME PROGRAM $1,218,482 # PROJECT & DESCRIPTION Request Staff Recomm City Council Adopt 1 HOME Administration/Technical Assistance Administrative funds for .75 FTE staff, planning, oversight, coordination, staff supervision, monitoring and evaluation, contracting, recordkeeping/reporting and overall program management. Staff training and administrative expenses are also included in request. Technical assistance will be provided to enhance the capacity of CHDO's, non -profits, owners/investors of rental property and other organizations that may participate in the program. The amount indicates 10% of the allowed 10% for administrative costs. $86,848 $86,848 2 Homebuyer Assistance Program Provide deferred forgivable loans to low income homebuyers up to $5,000 to assist them with the closing costs for the purchase of a home. $200,000 $200,000 3 Veterans Minor Home Repair Program The Veterans Minor Home Repair Program assists veteran homeowners with repairs involving roof, plumbing, electrical, heating, or minor structural repairs. The maximum grant amount is up to $15,000. The applicant must provide either the DD214 or Veteran ID card, have title in their name and reside in the home one year prior to applying for assistance, must be current on all taxes and must meet the HUD HOME Program income limits. $250,000 $250,000 INTERDEPARTMENTAL TOTAL $536,848 $536,848 NON- PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS - Funding determination will be made no later than September 1, 2016 1 Habitat for Humanity Habitat for Humanity Corpus Christi is proposing to use HOME funds to assist with the construction costs of ten (10) homes for low income families (30% - 60% AMI) during the 2017-2020 build years. Specifically, $20,000 will be applied to each home build for construction cost assistance. Total project cost: $750,000 $200,000 $200,000 2 Affordable Housing Project/Program Funding proposed will provide for a project and/or program for the continued efforts of the City of Corpus Christi to provide safe and affordable housing to individuals and families within the city limits. The funding will assist in identifying affordable housing needs in the community and allow for funding to assist such projects and/or programs. $250,000 $250,000 3 TG 110 - Calallen Apartments* (CHDO) Calallen Apartments, to be located on 14800 Northwest Blvd, is a proposed affordable housing multi -family community consisting of 94 units to serve low-income families, seniors, and individuals. The development will be financed primarily through the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs' Low Income Housing Tax Credits, private debt, and HOME funds through the City of Corpus Christi. Calallen Apartments will propose to serve residents at 30%, 50%, and 60% area median income. Total project cost: $16,474,498 $300,000 4 TG 110 - Samuel Place Apartments* (CHDO) Samuel Place Apartments, to be located on 4315 Carroll Lane, is an affordable housing multi -family community consisting of 60 units which serve low-income families, seniors and individuals. The project will propose to demolish and redevelop the existing complex. The development will be financed primarily through The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs' Low Income Housing Tax Credits, private debt, and HOME funds through the City of Corpus Christi. Samuel Place Apartments will serve residents at 30%, 50%, and 60% area median income. Total project cost: $13,505,964 $200,000 CHDO Total $500,000 $0 Other Entity $450,000 $450,000 1 # PROJECT & DESCRIPTION Request Staff Recomm City Council Adopt HCD Projects Total $536,848 $536,848 Overall Total $1,486,848 $986,848 Total Set -Aside to be determined no later than September 1, 2016 $231,634 *HOME Subrecipient Agencies who submitted HOME FY2016 funding will be awarded funding no later than September 1, 2016 after determination of which agencies received Housing Tax Credits from the Texas Department of Housing and Community 2 AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of July 19, 2016 DATE: June 27, 2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, Interim City Manager FROM: Stacie Talbert Anaya, Interim Director, Parks and Recreation Department StacieT@cctexas.com 361-826-3460 Community Enrichment Fund (4720) Appropriation CAPTION: Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept and appropriate $650,025.34 in developer contributions, other donations and interest earnings in the 4720 Community Enrichment Fund for park improvements and other related projects as described on the attached and incorporated Exhibit A. PURPOSE: To appropriate funds received from developer fees, other donations and interest earned in the Community Enrichment Fund so that the funds would be available for associated projects. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The Platting Ordinance provides that, should the City accept fee in lieu of land or park development fees, the fees shall be used for the acquisition or improvement of parks most likely to serve the residents of the subdivision. The park most likely to serve a subdivision shall in no case be located more than 5 miles from the subdivision, taking into consideration factors such as the proximity of major barriers to accessibility including freeways, navigable streams and bodies of water. Community Enrichment Funds shall be used only for parkland acquisition, park development and park improvements including utility extensions required to serve recreational areas. The last appropriation of Community Enrichment Funds was approved by City Council on January 12, 2016. ALTERNATIVES: Do not collect fees in lieu of land or park development fees for the acquisition or improvement of parks. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: City policy requires all funds drawn from the city treasury be appropriated by City Council before they can be expended. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal, Finance FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating X Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015- 2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $3,466,429.18 $3,466,429.18 Encumbered/Expended Amount (June 2016) 1,020,366.78 1,020,366.78 This item 650,025.34 650,025.34 BALANCE $3,096,087.74 $3,096,087.74 Fund(s): The No. 4720 Community Enrichment Fund was established to record revenues and expenditures for park land acquisition, park development, and improvement of parks. Comments: Revenues deposited to this fund for park development are 1) fees in lieu of land, and, 2) park development fee. Funds are appropriated periodically. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this agenda item. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance with Attachment — Schedule of Appropriations — Exhibit A Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept and appropriate $650,025.34 in developer contributions, other donations and interest earnings in the 4720 Community Enrichment Fund for park improvements and other related projects as described on the attached and incorporated Exhibit A. Be it Ordained by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, that: Section 1. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute all documents necessary to accept and appropriate $650,025.34 in developer contributions, other donations and interest earnings in the 4720 Community Enrichment Fund for park improvements, and other related projects as described on the attached and incorporated Exhibit A. Attest: City of Corpus Christi Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2016, by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2016, by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2016. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor City of Corpus Christi 4720 COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT FUND Deposits October 2015 to May 2016 Org Description To be appropriated Designated Project or Program 13436 Woodlawn/Bartholme Acre 963.14 West Guth Park 21300 Park Acq or Devel- Unrestricte 129,000.95 Major Investment Parks 21315 5 Woodbend 40,312.50 Lakeview, Candlewood, Lexington Adopt -a -Park 21336 Cole Park 257.00 Cole Park 21346 Waldron Park 21,250.00 Waldron Park 21357 HEB Park Pool & Tennis 24.54 HEB Park 21359 5 Park Development donation 625.00 Major Investment Parks 21371 Gateway Project - Ph 2 118.68 Gateway Park 21382 5 Bordeaux 21,982.65 Brockhampton, Brighton Parks 21396 Running Light/Joya Del Mar 3,750.00 Neighborhood Park 21424 Shoreline Oaks Subdivision 8,751.26 Parker Park 21432 Bayview Subdivision 625.00 Cole Park 21440 Park memorials 1,200.00 Memorials 21460 Development fees - Cm Enr Fd 96,761.24 Major Investment Parks 21627 Maples Hill 5,724.02 West Guth Park 21636 Vantage UpRvrRd/Hghwy Vlg 90,000.00 West Guth Park 21638 5 Meadow Park/Carver Addition 1,250.00 Salinas, Austin Parks 21662 Legends of Diamante 21,840.00 Hike and Bike Trails 21668 Gardendale 1,250.00 St. Andrews Park 21675 5 Don Patricio 21,346.49 Parker Park 21676 5 Vineyards 42,187.50 Hike and Bike Trails/Brockhampton 21687 Retta Place 5,880.00 Waldron Park 21698 5 Sandy Creek 22,750.00 Major Investment Park 21702 Waldron Park/Laguna Shores 625.00 Waldron Park 21708 5 Kitty Hawk 1,189.50 Neighborhood Park Total 539,664.47 21502 Beautification Promotion 125.68 21507 Ed Exchg Prog - Sister City 1,016.26 Sister City Program support 21511 Permanent Art 1,956.54 Permanent art acquisition or conservation 21511 2015 Tsfer -Permanent Art 12,820.11 21511 2014 Trsfr - Permanent Art 94,442.28 Total Contribution Total Interest & Contribution 110, 360.87 650,025.34 AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of 7/12/16 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of 7/19/16 DATE: June 10, 2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, Interim City Manager FROM: Laura Z. Garcia, Library Director lauraga@cctexas.com 826-7070 Ordinance for Texas State Library and Archives commission (TSLAC) grants. CAPTION: Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute documents, to apply for and accept grants and reimbursements from the Texas State Library and Archives Commission (TSLAC); and to appropriate funds from TSLAC in the No. 1068 Library Grant Fund for said City programs. PURPOSE: To streamline the approval and appropriation process for TSLAC grant and reimbursement applications. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: For many years the City has applied for and received grants and reimbursements from the Texas State Library and Archives. ALTERNATIVES: Do not approve ordinance. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: This ordinance would reduce number of agenda items. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Council appropriates reimbursements and grant awards. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal, Finance None FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital X Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015- 2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this ordinance. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance. Ordinance Authorizing the city manager or designee to execute documents to apply for and accept grants and reimbursements from the Texas State Library and Archives Commission (TSLAC); and to appropriate funds from TSLAC in the No. 1068 Library Grants Fund for said City programs. Whereas, the City has for many years applied for and received grants and reimbursements from Texas State Library and Archives Commission (TSLAC); Whereas, the City Council desires to streamline the approval and appropriation process for these grant and reimbursement applications; Whereas, the purpose of this ordinance is to address the following standard procedures related to these grants and reimbursements subject to verification by the Department of Finance that any required City matching funds and in-kind funding have been budgeted and appropriated in the Library department budget for such purpose: 1) approve the submission of grant and reimbursement applications, 2) grant authority to accept the award to the City Manager or designee, 3) grant authority to accept changes in award amount 4) establish the accounting fund/org number; and, 5) appropriate the grant or reimbursement funds, if awarded. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City Manager or designee is authorized to submit applications each fiscal year and execute all documents to accept grants and reimbursements from the Texas State Library and Archives Commission (TSLAC). This authorization is subject to verification by the Department of Finance that any required City matching funds and in-kind funding, if any, are appropriated in the Library department budget for such purpose. Section 2. Each fiscal year, should funding be awarded, upon execution of the grant or reimbursement agreements, that the grant or reimbursement funds awarded by the Texas State Library and Archives Commission (TSLAC) shall be deemed appropriated in the No. 1068 Library Grants Fund said funds may be spent by the Library Department for their intended purposes upon receipt of funding. Section 3. That the City Manager is authorized to establish necessary grant accounts for the appropriation, segregation, and expenditure of grant or reimbursement funds received by the Texas State Library and Archives Commission. Section 4. That the City Manager is authorized to execute contract amendments pertaining to these funds in the following instances: a) for carry-over funds, when ascertained and approved by the funding agency through a revised notice of award; b) for amendments which will provide supplemental grant funds in amount not to exceed 1 20% of the original grant; c) for reimbursement increases of administration funds for each participant served; d) for amendments to comply with applicable State of Federal laws and regulations; and e) for amendments which do not change the essential purpose of the grant. 2 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2016, by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Rudy Garza Michael Hunter Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Brian Rosas Lucy Rubio Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughn That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2016,by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Rudy Garza Michael Hunter Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Brian Rosas Lucy Rubio Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughn PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2016. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor 3 AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of 7/12/16 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of 7/19/16 DATE: TO: FROM: June 10, 2016 Margie C. Rose, Interim City Manager Laura Z. Garcia, Library Director lauraga@cctexas.com 826-7070 Ordinance for William T. Neyland estate royalties. CAPTION: Ordinance authorizing City Manager or designee to appropriate royalties received from oil, gas, and mineral interests bequeathed to the Corpus Christi La Retama Central Library by William T. Neyland into the Library Grants fund No 1068. PURPOSE: To streamline the approval and appropriation process for William T. Neyland estate royalties. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The City has received royalties from oil, gas, and mineral interests since 2006. ALTERNATIVES: Do not approve ordinance. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: This ordinance would reduce number of agenda items. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Council appropriates royalties. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal and Finance. FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital X Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015- 2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriation of funds. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Ordinance Authorizing City Manager or designee to appropriate royalties received from oil, gas, and mineral interests bequeathed to the Corpus Christi La Retama Central Library by William T. Neyland into the Library Grants fund No 1068. Whereas, William T. Neyland bequeathed oil, gas, and mineral interests to the La Retama Library; Whereas, the City of Corpus Christi Library will continue to receive royalties from oil, gas, and mineral interests bequeathed by William T. Neyland; Whereas, the City Council desires to streamline the appropriation process for these funds; and Whereas, the purpose of this ordinance is to address the following standard procedures related to appropriation of these cash distribution in the Library: 1) the City Manager or designee has the authority to establish the accounting fund/org number; and, 2) appropriate the cash distribution. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: Section 1. Each fiscal year royalties received from oil, gas, and mineral interests, bequeathed to the Corpus Christi Library by the Estate of William T. Neyland, shall be deemed appropriated in the No. 1068 Library Grants Fund and said funds may be spent on the La Retama Central Library. Section 2. That the City Manager is authorized to establish necessary fund accounts for the appropriation, segregation, and expenditure of funds received from oil, gas, and mineral interests bequeathed to the Corpus Christi Library by the Estate of William T. Neyland. 1 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2016, by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Rudy Garza Michael Hunter Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Brian Rosas Lucy Rubio Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughn That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2016,by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Rudy Garza Michael Hunter Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Brian Rosas Lucy Rubio Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughn PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2016. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor 2 AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading for the City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of July 19, 2016 DATE: July 6, 2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, Interim City Manager FROM: E. Jay Ellington, Interim Assistant City Manager jayellQcctexas.com 361-826-3232 Incorporation of City Council's requested changes to the City's vehicle for hire ordinance. CAPTION: Ordinance Amending Chapter 57, Article II "TAXICABS" of the Corpus Christi Code; Amending Chapter 57, Article IIIA "LIMOUSINE AND SIGHTSEEING SERVICE" of the Corpus Christi Code; amending Sec. 57-284. - Transportation network company permit fee and Sec. 57-294. - Transportation network vehicles—Inspections of the Corpus Christi Code; providing an effective date, severance, penalty, and publication. PURPOSE: This ordinance will incorporate changes to the City Code of Ordinances Chapter 57 requested by City Council during a series of 3 "D" discussions regarding vehicles for hire. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: On May 10th 2016 City Council passed ordinance #030788 which provides regulations for Transportation Network Companies to operate in Corpus Christi. To ensure the competitive equity of Taxi Cab Companies operating in Corpus Christi, City Council directed City Staff to bring forward the Vehicle for Hire Ordinance for revision. ALTERNATIVES: Make no changes to Chapter 57 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not Applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Not Applicable EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not Applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Police Department Legal Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital x Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015-2016 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: RECOMMENDATION: Accept the attached revisions to Chapter 57 LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance — Vehicle for Hire Ordinance Amending Chapter 57, Article II "TAXICABS" of the Corpus Christi Code; Amending Chapter 57, Article IIIA "LIMOUSINE AND SIGHTSEEING SERVICE" of the Corpus Christi Code; amending Sec. 57-284. - Transportation network company permit fee and Sec. 57-294. - Transportation network vehicles—Inspections of the Corpus Christi Code; providing an effective date, severance, penalty, and publication. SECTION 1. Chapter 57, Article II "TAXICABS" is revised to read as follows: ARTICLE II. - TAXICABS DIVISION 1. - GENERALLY Sec. 57-20. - Definitions. The following terms, as used in this article, article III, and article IIIA, shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them: Business days: The official working days of the City of Corpus Christi not including weekends or public holidays. Certificate: A certificate authorizing taxicab or vehicle for hire service in the City of Corpus Christi issued pursuant to this article. Driver or chauffeur: Shall be held to include every person in actual charge of the operation of a taxicab or vehicle for hire, whether he is the owner or is an agent, servant or employee of the owner. For hire: For money or other thing of value, gratuities, tips and free-will offerings, whether paid directly or indirectly, as compensation or consideration for services rendered. Mobile data terminal or MDT: A computerized GPS dispatch system terminal that is mounted in the vehicle to allow for dispatching of taxicabs. Owner: Any person, firm, corporation, association, partnership or society who holds a valid and current certificate and who has the control, direction, maintenance and the benefit of the collection of revenue derived from the operation of one (1) or more taxicabs on or over the streets or public ways of the city, whether as owner or otherwise. Taxicab: Every automobile or motor -propelled vehicle used for the transportation of passengers for hire over the public streets of the city and not over a defined or fixed route, irrespective of whether or not the operations extend beyond the city limits, at rates for distance traveled, for waiting time, for both or at rates per hour, per day, per week or per month under circumstances that such vehicle is routed under the direction of the passenger hiring same. The term "taxicab" does not include Transportation Network 1 Vehicles or Limousines. The term "taxicab" does not include driverless vehicles nor does it include vehicles operated exclusively under any special certificate carrying to or from any municipal airport of the city to any point within the city or through any part of the city, but the provisions relating to drivers shall apply to all vehicles operated under special certificate, as well as other vehicles included herein, when a driver is furnished. Taxicab stand: A public place alongside the curb or curbline of a street which has been designated by the city traffic engineer as reserved exclusively for the use of taxicabs in accordance with the provisions of this article and the traffic ordinances of the city. Taximeter: A machine adapted automatically to calculate at a predetermined rate and to register the charge for hire of a taxicab, and such charges shall be indicated numerically. Vehicle for hire: Shall mean every chauffeured vehicle, other than mass transit vehicles or vehicles involved in an organized car pool not available to the general public, which operated for any fare or compensation and used for the transportation of passengers over city streets. Such vehicles shall include but not be limited to taxicabs, buses, vans, motor coaches, limousines, classic vehicles, luxury vehicles, horse-drawn carriages and pedicabs. Waiting time: Such time as may be consumed or lost at the special instance and request of a passenger after such passenger has first entered the taxicab to make a trip and before reaching his final destination; and no charge shall be made against a passenger for any time lost on account of any other delay whatsoever. Sec. 57-21. - Enforcement and administration—Generally. Enforcement and administration of the provisions of this article and the supplemental regulations for taxicabs at the Corpus Christi International Airport shall be a function of such officers and employees of the city as may be designated by the city manager. The designated employees shall exercise powers and promulgate rules necessary to enforce the provisions of this article. Sec. 57-22. - Same—Police assistance. The taxicab inspector and such other employees as are designated by the city manager or his designee may call upon the police department of the city for cooperation in enforcing the provisions of this article, and it shall be the duty of the chief of police to direct the members of the police department to give such cooperative action as requested, and it shall further be the duty of all police officers of the city to make investigations of violations of this article and to make arrests for violations of this article committed in their presence in the same manner as for violations of the traffic ordinances of the city. 2 Sec. 57-23. - Taxicab inspector—Appointment. Taxicabs and vehicles for hire shall be under the supervision of the taxicab inspector of the city, who shall be appointed with the approval of the city manager. Sec. 57-24. - Same—Duties generally. It shall be the duty of the taxicab inspector to receive all applications for certificates to operate taxicabs and vehicles for hire and to receive all other applications under this article, conduct hearings thereon, from time to time inspect the operations of taxicabs and vehicles for hire; inspect the taxicab and vehicles for hire vehicles within the city; enforcement of city ordinances and such other duties as may be required of him in connection with the taxicab and vehicle for hire operations. Sec. 57-25. - Same—Records and reports; action to suspend or revoke privilege; records and reports by others. The taxicab inspector shall establish, maintain and keep a system of records showing whether the holder of any certificate to operate a taxicab or vehicle for hire in the city has been guilty of a breach of any condition of such certificate or has failed to comply in any material manner with the terms and stipulations thereof, and the taxicab inspector shall take action when, in his opinion, the certificate of any such operator should be suspended or revoked or penalties imposed on the holder under all the facts and circumstances reflected by the records. The records to be kept by the taxicab inspector as to performance of certificate holders shall include, but without limitation, records of charges, convictions, reprimands, warnings, and observations of officers and employees of the city concerning the performance of any certificate holder or employee of such holder. Sec. 57-26. - Certificate holder and driver to comply. (a) Certificate holder. In the operation of a taxicab or vehicle for hire service, a holder shall comply with the terms and conditions of this article and regulations established under this article and be responsible for all vehicles authorized to operate under the holder's certificate. (b) Driver. While on duty, all drivers shall comply with this article, regulations established under this article, other law applicable to the operation of a motor vehicle in this state, 3 and orders issued by the holder employing or contracting with the driver in connection with the holder's lawful discharge of his duty under this article. Sec. 57-27. - Certificate holder's duty to enforce compliance by drivers. (a) A holder of a valid and current certificate shall establish policy and take action to discourage, prevent, or correct violations of this chapter by drivers, who are employed by or contracting with the holder. (b) A holder shall not permit a driver who is employed by or contracting with the holder to drive a taxicab or vehicle for hire if the holder knows or has reasonable cause to know that the driver has failed to comply with the rules and regulations established by this article. (c) Any failure to comply with regulations established under this article shall be cause for suspension or revocation of the certificate authorizing the holder to operate a taxicab or vehicle for hire service within the city. Sec. 57 28. Contract driver. (a) Ccrtificate holdcrs may contract with a drivcr, but only if thc contract: taxicab or vehicle for hire driver shall indemnify the city and hold the city conduct of the driver, operation of business, condition or operation of vehicle or (2) Provides that any taxicab operated pursuant to such contract be properly licensed, be in good working order and be equipped with a two way (3) Provides that the driver agrees to operate the taxicab or vehicle for hire and conduct himself in compliancc with the Code of Ordinances of the City of Corpus Christi includcd but not limited to Article II, Taxicabs; Division /1, Vehicles; Division 5, Drivers; Division 6, Taximeters, Fares; and driver will constitute a breach of contract with thc certificatc holder. (b) The contract bctwecn a holder and drivcr must be consistent with regulations cstablished under this chaptcr. The certificatc holder must provide contracts upon regulations esta-bl+shcd under this chapter is subject to suspension or revocation. 4 Sec. 57-1-9 2b. - Suspension and revocation of certificate. Any certificate may be either suspended for any period of time not to exceed six (6) months or revoked by the taxicab inspector. (1) The taxicab inspector shall suspend or revoke a certificate if it is determined that the holder has: a. Failed to comply with a correction order issued to the holder by the taxicab inspector or his designee, within the time specified in the order; or b. Intentionally or knowingly impeded the city manager or his designee, the taxicab inspector or a law enforcement agency in the performance of their duties; or c. Failed to comply with the requirements established in this article in any way; or d. Been convicted for violation of another city, state or federal law, which violation reflects unfavorably on the fitness of the holder to perform a public transportation service; or e. Substantially breached the terms of the certificate; or f. Failed to pay city ad valorem taxes, when due, on all vehicles and other equipment used in connection with the taxicab service; or Failed to pay the street use Certificate of operation fee at the time it is due. g. (2) Every suspension or revocation of the certificate shall be in writing, dated and shall state the reason for such suspension or revocation. Such notice shall immediately be sent to the holder of such certificate. Such order of suspension or revocation shall be effective as of the date of such notice; provided, however, that the holder whose certificate has been suspended or revoked may within five (5) business days after the date of such notice appeal to the city manager or his designee for reinstatement by a request in writing for such relief. The city manager or his designee shall set a date not later than fifteen (15) business days following receipt of the notice of appeal for hearing and after such hearing sustain or reverse the suspension or revocation. If no appeal is taken within the time and by the method hereby provided, then the order of suspension or revocation by the taxicab inspector shall be final. (3) A suspension of a certificate shall not affect the expiration date of the certificate. (4) Upon revocation of a certificate, said holder shall be ineligible for a new certificate for a period of two (2) years. Reinstatement. After suspension of a permit, a holder may file with the city manager or his designee a written request for reinstatement. The taxicab inspector shall inspect the operation of the suspended holder to determine if the deficiency causing the suspension has been corrected by the holder. After inspection, the taxicab inspector shall submit his recommendation together with (5) 5 supporting facts to the city manager. The city manager or his designee may as he determines appropriate, reinstate the certificate or deny reinstatement. Sec. 57-29. - Reserved. DIVISION 2. - CERTIFICATE, FEES, BUSINESS REGULATIONS Sec. 57-30. - Certificate, license and permit required. It shall be unlawful for any person to drive or operate or to cause to be driven or operated any taxicab upon or over any street or thoroughfare in the city unless the owner or operator thereof has first secured a certificate from the city to operate a taxicab and the required license and permit to operate such vehicle under this article has been issued. Sec. 57-31. - Certificate application—Requisites, filing. Every person proposing to operate a taxicab service in the city shall make application in writing on forms provided by the city requesting a certificate pursuant to the terms of this article for such proposed taxicab service. Such application for certificate to operate a taxicab service shall be verified under oath and shall be filed in triplicate of noticcs as rcquircd in this articic. Sec. 57-32. - Same—Information to be given. Every application for a certificate under this article shall include the following information: (1) The name and address of the applicant. (2) A sworn statement by the applicant (which term shall include every person with a ten (10) per cent or greater ownership interest in the applicant) that there does not exist any unsatisfied final judgment against the applicant or any entity in which the applicant has or, at the time of judgment, had a ten (10) per cent or greater ownership interest, which judgment arose out of the operation of a taxicab business. 6 (3) Experience of the applicant in the transportation of passengers. (4) Whether the applicant has been convicted of criminal offenses listed by the city manager or his designee as reflecting unfitness to operate a public transportation service. (5) The minimum and maximum number of taxicabs proposed to be operated by the applicant. issuancc of a ccrtificatc shall be at (cast one (1). (6) Location of proposed base of operations in a location other than a dwelling. The color siccheme–and insignia to be used to designate the vehicles of the applicant, which shall be distinct and unique from any other taxi company currently operating. (8) The model year, make current license number, and vehicle identification number of each taxicab the applicant expects to use in its operation. Proof that he has in effect required insurance covering operations under the certificate. (7) (9) (10)The public telephone number to be used by the public to request service. (11)A description of the dispatch system to communicate requests from prospective passengers to the taxicab driver. continn 57_36 Sec. 57-33. - Same—Consideration of application or reapplication. When application for a certificate has been made, the city manager or his designee shall determine if the applicant has complied with the provisions of this article. The matter of determining whether the applicant has complied with the provisions of this article may be referred to the taxicab inspector for his advisory finding on such matter, and the taxicab inspector is authorized to hold such hearings as will give all interested parties an opportunity to present evidence on the question. Sec. 57 34. Reserved. Sec. 574534. - Same—Issuance. If it is determined from the investigation and hearing that the applicant has complied with the provisions of this article, a recommendation shall be made to the city manager or his designee that a certificate to operate taxicab service in the city be granted for a term not to exceed five (5) of 1 year:. from the date of issuance specifying the maximum number of taxicab vehicles which may be operated by the certificate holder during the five -1 year term. The applicant shall be notified of such recommendation. Certificates granted prior to July 1, 2016 shall remain in effect until the expiration of the certificate or renewal. Sec. 57-36. Taxicab street use fee. (a) Each owncr holding a ccrtificatc to operatc a taxicab upon thc strccts within thc city taxicab strcct usc fcc, thc maximum numbcr of vchicics shall bc no lowcr than fivc (b) Notwithstanding thc provisions of scction 57 35 a ccrtificatc holdcr may, upon writtcn requcst to the city manager or his dcsigncc, apply to incr se or decr sc MIN following consccutivc twclvc month period of thc rcmaining tcrm of thc currcnt ccrtificatc. (c) The number of vehicics in service by a certificate holder shall not exceed thc maximum numbcr of vchicics authorizcd to bc operatcd undcr such ccrtificatc. per ccnt latc fcc shall bc applicd to any strcct usc fcc submittcd past thc cstablishcd dcadlincs. willfully filc any false statements, the same shall be cause for a suspension or rcvocation of thc ccrtificatc authorizing thc holdcr to operatc a taxicab scrvicc within thc city. Sec 57-35 - Certificate of operation fee (a) Applicant shall elect the fee imposed for a Certificate issued pursuant to this article at the time of application or renewal. The fee imposed for a Certificate issued shall be in an amount equal to 2% of the annual gross receipts for the operation of each taxi operated in the City for the Certificate holder or based on the number of authorized taxis operating in the City for each quarter as shown below: (i) $400 quarterly for four or fewer taxis 8 (ii) $800 quarterly for five to eight taxis. (iii) $1,200 quarterly for nine to twelve taxis (iv) $1,600 quarterly for thirteen to sixteen taxis. (v) $2,000 quarterly for seventeen to twenty taxis (vi) $2,400 quarterly for twenty-one to twenty-four taxis (vii) $2,800 quarterly for twenty-five to twenty-eight taxis (viii) $3,200 quarterly for twenty-nine to thirty-two taxis (ix) $3,600 quarterly for thirty-three or more taxis (b) The Certificate of operation fee shall be paid quarterly as follows: on or after January 1 and before January 10; on or after April 1 and before April 10; on or after July 1 and before July 10; on or after October 1 and before October 10. (c) (1) 2% of Annual Gross Receipts -The initial payment for a fee based on 2% of Annual Gross Receipts shall cover the period beginning from the date the certificate was issued to the Certificate holder. Upon the submission of each quarterly payment, the Certificate holder shall file with the taxicab inspector a financial report itemizing the components of the Certificate holder's gross receipts for the payment period. All Certificate holders shall utilize any forms promulgated by the taxicab inspector for the submission of the required financial reports and shall submit the financial reports in accordance with any instructions, rules, or regulations promulgated by the taxicab inspector. (2) Number of Authorized Taxis - The initial payment for a fee based on the number of authorized taxis shall be prorated to cover the period beginning from the date the certificate was issued to the certificate holder. (d) Upon 10 days' notice to the certificate holder, the taxicab inspector shall have the right to inspect the certificate holder 's records the taxicab inspector deems necessary and appropriate to determine that the certificate holder is in compliance with the requirements of this section. (e) A certificate holder may, upon written request to the Taxi Inspector, apply to increase or decrease the maximum number of vehicles authorized to be operated during the remaining term of the current certificate. (f) If the holder of the certificate shall fail to comply with any requirement herein or shall willfully file any false statements, the same shall be cause for a suspension 9 or revocation of the certificate authorizing the holder to operate a taxicab service within the city. (q) The fees established in this section shall be payable in addition to any other applicable fees imposed by this Code or other ordinances of the city. (h) Certificates holders with a current certificate issued prior to July 1, 2016 may elect -to pay the city each three-month period as a certificate of operation fee an amount equal to one hundred dollars ($100.00) times the maximum number of vehicles authorized by a current and valid certificate. For the purpose of calculating the certificate of operation fee, the maximum number of vehicles shall be no lower than five (5). Sec. 57473 . - Payment of taxes, fees, etc. It shall be the duty of every owner of any taxicab operated within the city to render for and pay all ad valorem taxes to the city for all vehicles and other equipment used in such business, and a failure to render for and to pay such ad valorem taxes to the city, twenty or failure to pay any other fees, licenses or charges to the city before they become delinquent shall, if not paid after written notice of default, operate as a revocation of any certificate, license or permit authorizing the operation of taxicabs over the public streets, alleys and ways of the city. Sec. 57- . - Report as to drivers in charge of particular taxicabs. The owner of any taxicab used in the business of carrying passengers for hire upon the streets of the city and which is licensed to carry on such business shall, upon request of the taxicab inspector, report the drivers who are in charge of the particular cars at a specified time. Sec. 57- . - Records in connection with calls. Every holder of a certificate and owner or operator of a taxicab shall keep accurate records relating to calls received and services performed, the time of such calls or services, the name of the driver performing the service or making the service call, the place of such call and the time of return from such call; and access to such records shall be given to the taxicab inspector or the chief of police; and every refusal to give such records or furnish information kept regarding such matters shall be and is hereby made a misdemeanor and may additionally result in a suspension or revocation of certificate. 10 Sec. 57-439. - Responsibility of each person in engaging a taxicab or vehicle for hire. By taking any action in connection with this article II, article III and article IIIA on taxicabs or any vehicle for hire (including, but not limited to, inspections, investigations, administration, enforcement, recordkeeping, and the granting, suspension and revocation of certificates, licenses, and permits), the city and its agents and employees do not in any way represent or undertake to represent the fitness of any taxicab, driver, or aspect of the taxicab business, and it shall be the sole responsibility of each person to decide whether to engage or use a taxicab or vehicle for hire without relying on any action of the city. Secs. 57- —57-55. - Reserved. DIVISION 3. - FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Sec. 57-56. - Liability insurance—Generally. Before any license or permit shall be issued to any owner or operator of a taxicab or before any renewal of a license or permit shall be granted, the owner or operator shall be required to file a certificate of insurance with the taxicab inspector and thereafter keep in full force and effect a policy of auto liability insurance with a company duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas and performable in the county, insuring the public against any loss or damage that may result to any person or property from the operation of such vehicle; provided, that the maximum amount of recovery in such policy of insurance specified shall not, for each vehicle, be less than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) for injury or death of one (1) person and one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) for injuries or deaths in any one (1) occurrence; and not less than twenty- five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) for injury to or destruction of property in any one occurrence; Each insurance policy shall require notice from the insurer to the city at least ten (10) days before any such policy is to be terminated for any reason by the insurer or by the insured. So as to adequately protect the City of Corpus Christi and its residents, the risk manager shall have the authority to adjust auto liability insurance coverage limits in accordance with section 17-19 of this Code of Ordinances. Sec. 57-57. - Same—Continuing liability of insurance. All policies of public liability insurance shall contain a provision for continuing liability thereon up to the full amount thereof, notwithstanding any recovery thereon. 11 Sec. 57-58. - Nonliability of city for pecuniary responsibility. Neither the city nor any officer thereof shall be held liable for the pecuniary responsibility or solvency of any certificate holder or insurer or in any manner become liable on account of any act or omission relating to the operation of a taxicab or vehicle for hire. Secs. 57-59-57-74. - Reserved. DIVISION 4. - VEHICLES Sec. 57-75. - License required. It shall be unlawful for any person to drive or to operate or to cause to be driven or operated any taxicab upon or over any street in the city unless there has been obtained for such taxicab and existing in full force and effect a license duly issued by the taxicab inspector as provided in this division. However, for inspection purposes, an employee of the company may bring the taxicab for inspcctions to thc dcsignatcd inspcction point or for maintcnancc purposcs an cmploycc of thc company may drivc a taxi on city strcctc with thc off duty sign on thc dashboard. Sec. 57-76. - Prerequisites to issuance of license. Upon obtaining a certificate to operate a taxicab service in the city as provided in this article, the holder shall make application to the taxicab inspector for a license to be issued for each vehicle to be operated as a taxicab. The application shall bc Prior to the issuance of a license for a taxicab, inspcction of thc vchicic to dctcrminc certificate holder must provide documentation demonstrating that it the vehicle complies with the requirements of this article and the regulations promulgated pursuant thereto. In thc cvcnt a vchicic fails to pass this inspection fee. After the ten (10) busincss day reinspection period has lapsed, an additional fiftccn dollar ($15.00) inspcction fcc per vchicic to bc liccnscd will bc applicd. 12 Sec. 57-77. - Nontransferability of license. No license issued under the terms of this division shall be transferred to any other vehicle. No license shall be used for the operation of any vehicle under the provisions of this division except for the vehicle for which the license was issued. Each license shall be valid for so long as the vehicle remains in service as a taxicab and complies with the continuing requirements of this division and the regulations promulgated pursuant thereto. Sec. 57-78. - Posting license. The license issued for the operation of a taxicab under the terms of this division shall be posted within the taxicab in a conspicuous place. Sec. 57-79. - Contents of license. The license shall state the year in which the license is issued and the name of the owner of the vehicle. It shall designate that the vehicle is a "taxicab," shall state the make of the vehicle, the vehicle identification number of the vehicle and current license number of the vehicle and shall further state that the owner or operator of the vehicle has deposited with the city a certificate of insurance providing for the protection of the passengers thereof and of the general public as provided for in this article, and the license shall be signed by the taxicab inspector of the city. Persons desiring to file complaints or comments concerning the operation or condition of a taxicab may refer to the contents of the license to note pertinent information and forward such complaints or comments to the taxicab inspector at the address indicated on the license. Sec. 57-80. - Inspections—Generally. It shall bc thc duty of thc taxicab inspcctor to inspcct cvcry liccnscd taxicab or vchicic for hirc on an annual basis for thc purposc of dctcrmining whcthcr such vchicic dcscribcd in scction 57 87. The ccrtificatc holdcr shall submit such vchicic to thc taxicab by thc taxicab inspcctor shall be placcd on thc vchicic's windshicld stating thc datc and without thc scal of thc taxicab inspcctor indicating currcnt inspcction. If thc taxicab to bc uscd as a taxicab, he shall rcmovc thc inspcction scal and ordcr such vchicic not to 13 bc uscd as a taxicab until thc dcfcct so discovcrcd shall bc rcmcdicd. Aftcr thc owncr of such vehicle has remedied the defect, he shall again offer the same for inspection, and if thc taxicab inspcctor shall find such vchicic to bc safc and acccptablc for public usc, he initial inspcction, thc ccrtificatc holdcr shall havc tcn (10) busincss days to rcmcdy any additional inspcction fcc. Aftcr thc tcn (10) busincss day rcinspcction period has lapscd 11 applicd. Nothing containcd hcrcin, howcvcr, shall prcvcnt thc taxicab inspcctor from power so to do, and upon finding such taxicab to be in a defectivc, unsafe or taxicab discontinucd until thc taxicab is approvcd and thc inspcction c al placcd on thc windshield. (a) A taxi must have a valid State of Texas registration sticker. (b) An offense under this section shall be punishable by a fine of not less than $250.00, nor more than the maximum amount established by law, for each violation.. Sec. 57 81. Same Right of appeal from decision of inspector. dcsigncc within tcn (10) busincss days from thc datc of such finding and ordcr, and thc fiftccn (15) busincss days h ar such appeal and shall cithcr sustain, modify or rcvcrsc thc dccision of thc taxicab inspcctor. If no app takcn from thc dccision of thc taxicab fin . Sec. 57- . - Operation of taxicabs. No taxicab for which a license shall have been issued shall be operated by anyone except a driver properly permitted to operate a taxicab under this article, except for inspection and maintenance purposcs as prcscribcd in scction 57 75. 14 Sec. 57- . - Identification on taxicabs. (a) Every taxicab shall display, as provided by rule, consistent and distinctive signage at all times while being operated as a taxi. The distinctive signage shall be sufficiently large and color contrasted (i) as to be readable at a distance of at least 50 feet, and (ii) to identify a particular vehicle associated with a particular Certificate holder. Acceptable forms of distinctive signage include, but are not limited to, symbols or signs on vehicle doors, roofs, or grilles. Magnetic or other removable distinctive signage is acceptable. Certificate holders shall file an illustration of their distinctive signage with the taxicab inspector for approval. (b) A taxi shall display a consistent and distinctive emblem at all times while being used to provide vehicle for hire transportation services. The taxicab inspector is authorized to specify, by rule, the manner of display, method of issuance, design and contents of such emblem. havc placcd on thc front door or pancl on cach sidc of thc cab thc namc of thc owncr or thc assumcd namc undcr which thc owncr operatcs, togcthcr with thc company's Icttcring mcntioncd in this scction shall not bc Icss than two and one half (2%) inchcs in Sec. 57 84. Signal indicating occupancy of taxicab. Thcrc shall bc affixcd on thc outsidc top and front portion of cach taxicab an cicctrio pcoplc on thc strcct or sidcwalks in thc vicinity of such taxicab, and whcn a passcngcr dcvicc shall bc placcd in such position as to dcnotc that such taxicab -is cmploycd. Sec. 57-8583. - Dispatch communication system. drivcr of thc taxicab to rcccivc rcqucsts for scrvicc from thc public using thc busincss tcicphonc numbcr of thc taxicab scrvicc and to respond or communicatc such circumstances which render the taxicab unable to respond to such requests for thc public. Taking or making ccll phonc calls or tcxting is prohibitcd with a passcngcr in thc vchicic. 15 (a) (b) A certificate holder or driver shall not monitor the radio frequency of another holder for the purpose of responding to a call for taxicab service dispatched by the other holder's taxicab service. Sec. 57- . - Taxicab stands—Use relations. Taxicab stands shall be occupied only by taxicabs having licenses in good standing. Vehicles shall be in numbers in accordance with the number of spaces designated at the respective locations. It shall be the duty of the city to place signs bearing the number of spaces of each taxicab stand. No vehicle other than a licensed taxicab shall be permitted to stop, stand or park for any purpose in any designated and established taxicab stand. All taxicab or vehicle for hire vehicics shall be determined to be in a safc, acceptablc condition by thc taxicab inspcctor. Thc taxicab inspcctor shall pass a vchicic for inspcction whcn thc following minimum standards arc mct: (a) Operational condition: to horsc drawn carriagcs and pcdica-s); (2) Shall bc frcc of cxccssivc visiblc cxhaust, cxccssivc cnginc noisc and rcadily idcntificd mcchanical dcfccts including but not limitcd to thc brakc systcm, transmission systcm, ignition systcm, air conditioning and hcating (b) Extcrior condition: (1) The body and trim shall be intact, not have excessive dents or bent out of not impcdcd thc safc operation of thc vchicic. (2) Thc cxtcrior paint shall bc frcc of rust, flakcd or scrapcd arcas. (3) Thc windshicld shall bc frcc of crackcd glass. (c) Interior condition: (1) Thc intcrior shall bc frcc of dust, dirt, rubbish, and bc othcrwisc cican and sanitary. (2) Thc intcrior paint shall bc frcc of rust, flakcd, or scrapcd ar 16 ('I) The interior trunk shall be cican, sanitary, and free of dcbris. Sec. 57- . - Age of vehicle. The certificate holder shall not allow a vehicle in his or her taxicab service to be more than six (6) 7 years old at the time it is placed into service, nor more than tcn (10) years old while it is maintained for service. The age of the vehicle shall be calculated from January 1 of the model year of the vehicle. No vehicles which are more than 10 years old, as calculated above, may be used as taxicab vehicle. Exception : No vehicles modified with specialized access equipment to service persons with disabilities which are more than rtccn (15) years old, as calculated above, may be used as taxicab vehicle. Vehicles modified with specialized access equipment to service persons with disabilities which are more than 10-j years old must pass an annual physical and mechanical inspection at a location to be designated by the taxi inspector. Vehicles modified with specialized access equipment to service persons with disabilities which are more than :en (10; years old must be approved by the taxi inspector. (2) Vehicles registered as "Classic" which have valid State of Texas registration sticker may be used as taxicab vehicle. Classic vehicles must be approved by the taxi inspector. Secs. 57- 8b-57-95. - Reserved. DIVISION 5. - DRIVERS Sec. 57-96. Taxicab Vehicle for hire driver's permit required; permit fee. (a) Every person desiring to drive a taxicab or vehicle for hire in the city shall apply for and obtain a taxicab c vehicle for hire driver's permit from the taxicab inspector. It shall be unlawful for any person holding a certificate for the operation of a taxicab service in the city to permit any person to drive a taxicab or vehicle for hire unless such person shall have a driver's permit in good standing duly issued by the taxicab inspector, with the exception of inspection purposes under section 57 75. (b) The fee for an original, renewal or transfer taxicab or vehicle for hire driver's permit is a nonrefundable fifty dollars ($50.00) and shall be paid at the time the permit 17 application is filed with the taxicab inspector. The fee for a replacement permit is twenty dollars ($20.00). Sec. 57-97. - Application for taxicab or vehicle for hire driver's permit. (a) To obtain a city taxicab or vehicle for hire driver's permit, each person shall make a sworn written application to the taxicab inspector, which application shall be made upon the form provided and shall contain the following information: (1) The name, age and address of applicant. (2) The name of the business or person by whom the applicant expects to be or is contracted with. (3) The applicant's place of residence for the past five (5) years. Applicant must be a resident of Corpus Christi, Nueces County or the contiguous counties bordering Nueces County for three (3) months. (4) A full description of the applicant, including his height, weight, color of eyes and hair, distinguishing body features or marks, a full set of applicant's fingerprints and four (4) current passport photos of applicant. Taxi inspector shall have the authority to determine acceptable photographs. Whether applicant has had experience driving a taxicab or vehicle for hire or in a related type of work. (6) Whether applicant has ever been convicted of or charged with a felony or misdemeanor and, if so, full information concerning the same. Whether applicant has been convicted of or charged within the past three (3) years of a traffic law violation and, if so, full information concerning the same. The applicant shall execute a release authorizing law enforcement agencies, to the extent lawful, to furnish all his criminal history information record to the taxicab inspector, and authorizing release by the taxicab inspector to the prospective taxicab or vehicle for hire company. The taxicab inspector may establish the reasonable time periods for which different kinds of criminal history information is required to be furnished. (5) from a local physician, which ccrtificatc shall ccrtify that applicant docs not suffcr in a safe manner upon the streets of the city; such medical report shall spccifically statc thc condition of hcaring and cycsight of thc applicant. {6-}Ej The number and date of issuance of applicant's Texas Class A, B or C license. cxcccd two (2) y ars bctwccn complction datc and application datc. will cxpirc thirty (30) calcndar days aftcr thc datc it is grantcd whilc pcnding 18 rcquircmcnts found at scction 57 98 of this Codc. Sec. 57-98. - Decision of taxicab inspector. (a) The taxicab inspector shall investigate or cause to be investigated the character, experience, and qualifications of the applicant for a taxicab or vehicle for hire driver's permit in order to determine the applicant's fitness to operate a taxicab or vehicle for hire consistent with the public safety and welfare. (b) The taxicab inspector shall determine that all provisions of this division have been complied with, and shall consider whether issuance of a permit would constitute an unreasonable risk to the public safety and welfare. (c) The taxicab inspector shall consider whether the applicant has been guilty of a criminal act directly related to the occupation of taxicab or vehicle for hire driver. In determining whether the criminal act directly relates to said occupation, the taxicab inspector shall consider: (1) The nature and seriousness of the crime; (2) The relationship of the crime to the purpose of requiring a taxicab or vehicle for hire driver permit, for example, the following are deemed to have such a relationship because of danger to passengers and the property and potential for criminal activities enhanced by the large number of citizen contacts: a. Theft and other crimes of dishonesty, b. Assaultive crimes, c. Solicitation of prostitution, d. Sexual abuse crimes, e. Crimes of alcohol or drug abuse, f. Traffic offenses; The extent to which the permit might offer an opportunity to engage in further criminal activity of the same type; The extent and nature of the past criminal activity; The age of the applicant when the crime was committed; The amount of time elapsed since the applicant's last criminal activity; The conduct and work activity of the person prior to and following the criminal activity; (8) Evidence of rehabilitation efforts; (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 19 (9) Other evidence of personal fitness submitted by the applicant such as recommendations from prosecution, law enforcement, correctional officers. (10)Taxicab inspector may take into consideration previously documented complaints against a current driver seeking renewal or transfer of driver's permit and any arrests, charges or convictions of violations of the taxicab code under chapter 57 of the Municipal Code or the supplemental regulations for taxicabs at the Corpus Christi International Airport for any applicant seeking new, renewal or transfer of permit. (d) Upon receipt of a release executed by the applicant, the police department shall furnish to the taxicab inspector all the applicant's criminal history information records lawfully available to the department for licensing purposes. Said information shall be kept completely confidential by the taxicab inspector, except to the extent lawful, it may be provided to the applicant upon his request, it may be introduced in evidence in a proceeding in which the applicant contests denial of a permit, and it may be shown to the prospective taxicab or vehicle for hire company in accordance with the applicant's release. Such information shall be used by the taxicab inspector for the sole purpose of determining the applicant's fitness. (e) It is the duty of every certificate holder to screen its drivers. While it is the intent of the city in its permitting process to provide protection to the public generally by exercise of police power, such exercise shall not relieve a certificate holder from its duty to determine the fitness of its drivers, and no certificate holder shall rely on the city taxicab driver's permit to excuse it from said duty. The continued contracted driver relationship by a certificate holder of, or contractual agreement with, any person as a driver whose record as a criminal or as a driver of motor vehicles as reflected by official court and police department records shows a lack of mental, emotional or temperamental capacity to be a safe and reliable driver will be taken into consideration by the city when requested to grant or renew a certificate. Sec. 57 99. City's geography test required. taxicab drivcr's permit covcring knowlcdgc of city strccts, buildings, ctc., to be composcd his knowlcdgc of city gcography, the taxicab inspcctor shall not grant a city taxicab driver's permit to such applicant. Sec. 57- . - Identification cards. After the applicant has complied with all requirements of the provisions of this article and a permit has been issued, he shall receive two (2) 1 identification cards, one (1) of 20 which shall contain the full view photograph of the applicant ar police identification number, and further, such card shall read 10 THE PASSENGER OF THIS C/\b: it trio description of thc driver of this cab docs not conform to the photograph hereon, you will please leave the cab and notify name of the company." The identification card will be posted in full view in the passenger compartment of the taxicab which the applicant may be operating, and ch taxicab in operation within thc city undcr thc provisions of this article will bc required to purchase a container to receive this card, which container will be permanently attachcd to each taxicab. or and police identification number of thc applicant. Such card shall bc carried or worn with a clip on the person of the applicant and presented for identification purposes on demand of any passenger, the taxicab inspector or any police officer of the city. Sec. 57- . - Appeal from issuance or denial of taxicab or vehicle for hire driver's permit. After the taxicab inspector has made his decision, either the applicant for the driver's permit or any citizen of the city shall have the right to appeal to the city manager or his designee within ten (10) business days, which appeal shall be perfected by delivering, in writing, a statement that an appeal from the decision of the taxicab inspector is desired. The city manager or his designate will then, within a period of not more than fifteen (15) business days after receiving such notice of appeal, grant a hearing thereon and after the hearing of the appeal the city manager or his designee shall, within a period of five (5) business days, sustain or reverse the decision of the taxicab inspector. If no appeal is taken from the findings made by the taxicab inspector within the time provided above, the decision of the taxicab inspector shall be final. Sec. 57- . - Driver registration files. A registration file shall be kept and maintained on each person to whom a driver's permit has been issued. The file shall contain all information furnished by the applicant under this division and all other facts and data supplied by investigation, including without limitation fingerprints, personal history, police or criminal record, character, experience, qualifications and such other matters considered consistent with and pertinent to a showing whether the driver is fit to operate a taxicab or vehicle for hire within the city in a manner consistent with the welfare of the citizens. 21 The file of any taxicab or vehicle for hire driver may be inspected at the office of the taxicab inspector by such driver at all reasonable times and may be examined by any holder of a taxicab certificate upon showing that the driver has applied to the certificate holder as a contract driver. Every application for a driver's permit as a taxicab or vehicle for hire driver under provisions of this division shall execute an agreement and waiver in writing, at the time of filing the application, by which the applicant authorizes the taxicab inspector to permit a certificate holder to make such examination in good faith to determine whether, in the judgment of the prospective certificate holder, the driver should be contracted to drive taxicabs or a vehicle for hire in the city. Sec. 57- . - Duration and renewal of driver's permit. The taxicab or vehicle for hire driver's permit, when issued, shall not be transferable and same shall be valid for a period of twenty-four (24) months and shall expire automatically unless renewed. No renewal shall be issued thirty (30) days after a permit has expired. No renewal of any taxicab or vehicle for hire driver's permit shall be issued unless and until the applicant for renewal has completed a renewal application and met the requirements of section 57-97(a)(1)—(67), (8) and494; shall have shown proof of 97(a)(7); and provided further, that the applicant must have maintained a satisfactory driving record according to standards established by the taxicab inspector. All of the above requirements of section and any violations of this article, article III or IIIA shall be taken into consideration before a approval of a renewal application is granted. Sec. 57-1-04103._- Suspension or revocation of taxicabs or vehicle for hire driver's permit. Any taxicab or vehicle for hire driver's permit may be either suspended for any period of time not to exceed thirty (30) days or revoked by the taxicab inspector if the holder of such permit violates any of the provisions of this division, article III or article IIIA r article . Material misrepresentations on the driver's application are grounds for revocation. Such permit may also be revoked or suspended if the holder of the permit is guilty of a crime or traffic offense directly related to the holder's fitness to continue as a taxicab driver. Every suspension or revocation of the permit shall be dated and in writing and state the reason for such suspension or revocation. Such notice shall immediately be sent to the holder of such permit to the address shown on the identification card. Such order of suspension or revocation shall be effective as of the date of sending such notice; provided, however, that the person whose permit has been suspended or revoked may, within five (5) business days after the date of sending such notice, appeal to the city manager or his designee for reinstatement by a request in writing for such relief. The city 22 manager or his designee shall set a date not later than fifteen (15) business days following receipt of the notice of appeal for a hearing and after such hearing shall either sustain, reverse, or modify the order of the taxicab inspector. If no appeal is taken within the time and by the method hereby provided, then the order of suspension or revocation by the taxicab inspector shall be final. Sec. 57 105. Neat and clean appearance of drivers. holder to comply with the following: Bermuda shorts or cargo shorts, with a finished hem, shirts with slecves and collars, socks a-sfesed toed shoes. (2) All female drivers shall w ar full length slacks or shorts commonly rcfcrrcd to as Bermuda shorts or cargo shorts, with a finished hem, regular length skirts, blouses, socks or stockings and closed tocd shoes. (3) All drivers shall wear clean, unsoiled and untorn clothing. ('I) All drivers shall maintain proper personal hygiene, i.e., be shaven or have facial (b) While on duty, all drivers are prohibited from wearing: (1) Tcc shirts as an outer garment, except as allowed in scction 57 105(c). (2) Hoodies, sweat shirts and sweat pants. (3) Halters or tubc tops. ('I) Shirts with tails worn outsidc pants. below requirements: (1) Meet the color scheme of the taxicab company. (2) Are professional in appearance. (3) Contain no languagc or imagcs that could be offensive to othcrs. profcssional appearancc standards. Sec. 57406104. - Length of time driver may operate taxicab. 23 It shall be unlawful for a driver of any taxicab to drive the same continuously for more than twelve (12) hours, and no owner of any taxicab shall permit any driver of any taxicab to be continuously on duty, as a driver, for a greater period than twelve (12) hours within any twenty -four-hour period. Sec. 57- . - Use of alcoholic beverages or controlled substances. It shall be unlawful for any taxicab driver to consume any alcoholic beverages or use any form of controlled substances while on duty as a taxicab driver. This is to include prescription drugs prescribed to the driver that may affect his ability to drive and those illegal smoking products and related paraphernalia outlined in section 33-124 of the City Code. If a cab company requests random drug/alcohol test of an contract driver or requests drug/alcohol test due to a traffic accident or contract driver injury and driver refuses the test, the cab company will report refusal immediately to the taxi inspector and refusal will result in automatic suspension of driver's permit. If a cab company requests random drug/alcohol test of an contract driver or requests drug/alcohol test due to a traffic accident or contract driver injury and driver refuses the test, the cab company will report refusal immediately to the taxi inspector and refusal will result in automatic suspension of driver's permit. Sec. 57- . - Notification of change of address of drivers. Every person operating any taxicab shall keep the taxicab inspector informed by written notice of any change of address of such driver. Sec. 57- . - Most direct route to be used. Any driver of a taxicab contracted to carry passengers to a definite point shall take the most direct route possible that will carry the passengers safely and expeditiously to their destination. Sec. 57 110. Delivery of articles left in taxicabs to police. All drivcrs of taxicabs shall promptly delivcr to the taxi inspcctor's office or to delivcred to thc authorized agent of their company, thc property shall be dclivcrcd to thc 24 property if not claimed by the thirticth day after property is found in vehicle. Taxi inspector .1• . Sec. 57-1-14108. - Parking restrictions. No taxicab shall be parked in a residential section of the city awaiting calls between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. Sec. 57-142109. - Consent by passenger to carrying other passengers. It shall be unlawful for any taxicab driver to carry any person other than the passenger by whom he is engaged without the consent of such passenger. Sec. 57-1110. - Soliciting for passengers. No person shall solicit patronage or call attention to a taxicab in a loud or annoying tone of voice or by sign or in any manner annoy any person or obstruct the movement of any person or follow any person for the purpose of soliciting patronage. Sec. 574-14111. - Aiding prostitution. It shall be unlawful for any driver of a taxicab to knowingly transport any passenger to the abode of a prostitute or knowingly to transport any criminal, narcotic peddler, prostitution bootlegger in the commission of a crime or infraction of the law in any manner, or act in any manner as a panderer or pimp for prostitutes, or a contact for unlawful establishments of any character. Violations of this section shall be brought to the attention of the respective certificate holder that the taxicab is contracted with or employed by. Repeated occurrences, by the same or other drivers of the certificate holder may be grounds for suspension or revocation of the certificate holder's certificate or the permitted driver's permit or both. Sec. 57-115. - Off-duty status of taxicabs. comply with the following rcquircmcnts: 25 inches in height with a strokc width of not Icss than three eighths (3/8) inch. The letters shall be on a backing of sufficient thickness to not easily bend. from outside of the taxicab. Secs. 574112-57-126. - Reserved. DIVISION 6. - TAXIMETERS; FARES Sec. 57-127. - Taximeters defined. For the purpose of this article the word "taximeter" shall be construed to mean a mechanical instrument or device by which the charge for hire of a taxicab is mechanically calculated for distance, travel and waiting time, if any, under which such charges shall be indicated by clear, legible figures, which mechanism is placed in operation by throwing or switching from nonearning to earning position. Sec. 57-128. - Taximeters required. taxicab unless such taxicab is equipped with a taximeter. Sec. 57 129. Taximeter flag Equipment in connection therewith. distribution so that whcn thc taximctcr flag is in thc "high" or non arning position, thc electrically controlled advertising or company identification sign mountcd on thc top of thc taxicab will be automatically lighted; and whcn the taximctcr flag is on "mileage" or "time," both of which arc earning positions, colored tell tale lights on top of the cab or on color of which lights shall diffcr from those used by any other company. 26 Sec. 57 130. Same False display. taxi is not employed. Sec. 57 131. Testing, inspection and approval of taximeter. No person shall drive or operate a taxicab to which is attachcd a taximcter which has approvcd undcr thc supervision of thc taxicab inspcctor before using. Inspection of taximeters by thc taxicab inspector shall be madc as provided in scction 57 2'1. Sec. 57-14212(.. - Location and illumination of taximeters. All taximeters shall be placed in such a position in the taxicab so that the face thereof and the fare numerals may be easily seen and read by a passenger sitting in any part of the taxicab. Every taximeter used between sunset and sunrise shall have the face thereof illuminated by a light so arranged as to throw a continuous light thereon. Sec. 5743312F. - Defective taximeters prohibited. The operation of any taxicab with a taximeter which is defective or which does not properly and accurately compute and register on its face the charge for distance traveled or waiting time of a taxicab shall constitute a violation of this article. Sec. 57- . - Type and design of taximeter. No taximeter shall be used on any taxicab the type and design of which have not been approved by the taxicab inspector. Prior to the installation of a taximeter, the owner or operator of the taxicab shall submit the type and design of taximeter to the taxicab inspector. If the taximeter is capable of properly and accurately computing and registering on its face the charge for the distance traveled by and the waiting time of the taxicab, the taxicab inspector shall approve the taximeter. 27 Sec. 57-1-35131. - Fares—Amounts. the City of Corpus Christi for one (1) or more persons, not exceeding seven (7) persons, • AM additional charge for each succeeding one fifth (1/5) mile or fraction thereof, based upon the average retail price of one (1) gallon of regular gasolinc sold within the City of Corpus Christi and in accordance with the following chart: Per gallon gasoline price Under 3.50 3.50 3.75 $O.50 0.55 3.76 '1.00 '1.01 '1.25 0.60 0.65 '1.26 '1.50 0.70 The price of one (1) gallon of regular gasoline sold within the City of Corpus Christi 1,1 www.fuelgaugcreport.com. Such price will be dctermined by the current Corpus Christi Thc taxicab inspector shall disseminate thc gasolinc pricc. For each one (1) hour of waiting time or traffic delay time, thc maximum charge shall be twenty four dollars ($2'1.00). Thc above established rates of farc arc thc maximum that may be charged, provided .m passenger fares may include a one dollar ($1.00) surcharge per farc collected from one (1) or more persons not to exceed seven (7) persons. For customers wishing to use a credit card a one dollar ($1.00) convenience fee may be added to thc farc. thc city limits a driver shall keep the taximeter in operation while the taxicab -Fs employed charged, 28 Intcrstate 358 or west of the Clarkwood Road and Intcrstatc 37 intcrscction, thcrc will be a ten dollar ($10.00) minimum fare allowed. (a) Metered Rate. Prior to charging a metered rate for a taxicab fare originating and ending within the city limits of the City of Corpus Christi, metered rates must be filed by the certificate holder with the taxi inspector and clearly posted in the taxicab. The metered rate filed with the taxi inspector shall establish the maximum amount to be charged for the first one-fifth (1/5) mile or Tess, and an additional charge for each succeeding one-fifth (1/5) mile or fraction thereof. Such rate may include a minimum charge and drop fee, if such fee has been filed by the certificate holder with the taxi inspector and clearly posted in the taxicab. An hour waiting time or traffic delay time may be charged if such fee has been filed by the certificate holder with the taxi inspector and clearly posted in the taxicab. A minimum fare may be established for taxi fares originating in the area east of the Intercoastal Causeway Bridge on Interstate 358 or west of the Clarkwood Road and Interstate 37 intersection, if such fee has been filed by the certificate holder with the taxi inspector and clearly posted in the taxicab. (b) Minute Rate - Where a metered or flat rate is not charged, an alternative minute rate may be imposed. Prior to charging a minute rate for a taxicab fare originating and ending within the city limits of the City of Corpus Christi, minute rates must be filed by the certificate holder with the taxi inspector and clearly posted in the taxicab. The metered rate filed with the taxi inspector shall establish the maximum amount to be charged per minute. (c) Flat Rate — Where a metered or minute rate is not charged, an alternative flat rate for taxicab fares may be imposed for trips originating and ending within geographic zones I through VIII of the Corpus Christi Flat Rate Zone Map. The alterative flat rate can be increased per zone crossed for trips originating and ending in a different zone. To impose an alternative flat rate, a flat rate fee schedule must be filed by the certificate holder with the taxi inspector. Additionally, a copy of the Corpus Christi Flat Rate Zone Map must be posted in the taxicab along with the flat fee rate schedule. A copy of the Corpus Christi Flat Rate Zone Map may be provided by the taxi inspector and shall remain on file for public inspection in the office of the city secretary. Zone Corpus Christi Flat Rate Zones Island 29 II Flour Bluff III Southside IV Central V Downtown VI Airport VII Calallen (d) A cancelation fee may be charged where a passenger cancels after booking, if such fee has been filed by the certificate holder with the taxi inspector and posted on the website used by the certificate holder and communicated to the passenger at booking. Sec. 57 1361 . - Same—Charging or collecting excess fares. It shall be unlawful for any driver or operator to charge or demand payment of any fares in excess of the fares prescribed by the council filed with the taxi inspector. All fares rhea witn the taxicao orrice must be posted in the taxicab. Sec. 57- '°"' . - Same—Refusal to convey; refusal to transport passenger at specified rate. It shall be unlawful for any driver of any taxicab to refuse to board and convey a passenger on a basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability, including a driver's refusal to board and convey any service animal or medical equipment utilized in conjunction with a passenger's disability. It shall be unlawful for any driver of any taxicab to refuse to board and convey a passenger at the rates authorized by this article. It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this subsection that the driver advised the passenger of the fare or estimated fare to the passenger's destination, and the passenger advised that he did not have the means to pay the fare. Sec. 57- . - Same—Refusal to pay legal fare. It shall be unlawful for any person to refuse to pay the legal fare of any of the vehicles mentioned in this article after having hired the same, and any person who shall 30 hire any such vehicle with the intent to defraud the person from whom it is hired shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Sec. 57- . - Same—Display of rate schedule in taxicab. There shall be posted in a conspicuous place on the inside of each licensed taxicab, in addition to the license issued to the licensee required by this article, a card showing the rates charged. Sec. 57- . - Same—Receipts. It shall be unlawful for the driver of any taxicab upon receiving full payment of a fare to refuse to give a receipt upon the request of any passenger making such payment. SECTION 2. Chapter 57, Article IIIA "LIMOUSINE AND SIGHTSEEING SERVICE" is revised to read as follows: ARTICLE IIIA. - LIMOUSINE AND SIGHTSEEING SERVICE Sec. 57-164. - Definitions. For the purposes of this article: (a) Limousine service means the luxurious, prearranged transportation by chauffeur - driven 'ehicle limousine of one (1) or more persons from or to a location within the city limits not upon a schedule or over a fixed route. It shall not include taxicab service, airport limousine service or transportation provided in relation to funeral services. (b) Limousine means: (1) ,— ua� -type luxury motor vehicle with a passenger capacity of five or six persons (including the driver), which vehicle is either less than or equal to seven years of age; (2) An extended -body type motor vehicle with a passenger capacity of no more than 15 persons (including the driver), which is modified to extend its original factory wheelbase by 40 inches or more in conformity with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard requirements 31. (3) A vehicle that is classified in the United States Environmental Protection Agency's annual Fuel Economy Guide as a sport utility vehicle that: (i) has a passenger capacity of not less than five persons nor more than nine persons, including the driver; (ii) has a manufacturer's suggested base retail selling price of not less than $37,600.00, adjusted annually based upon Consumer Price Index (CPI -U), All Urban Consumers, U.S. City Average, New Trucks, as published by the U.S. Department of Labor, excluding the cost of any manufacturer installed options or of any modifications or conversions that were made by other persons following the original assembly of the vehicle by the manufacturer. The adjustment shall be based upon the not seasonally adjusted data for the month of August and shall be effective November 1st; and (iii) is either less than or equal to seven years of age; (4) A passenger van with a passenger capacity of nine to 15 persons (including the driver), which vehicle is less than or equal to ten years of age. a vchicic with an occupancy capacity of fivc (5) or morc, cxcluding thc capacity of thc driver compartment and that is uscd for the hircd transportation of persons. (b) Sightseeing service means conveying any person or persons in any vehicle, including horse-drawn carriages, for predetermined periods of time or between fixed points for the purpose of displaying the various natural and manmade points of interest and the economic and cultural institutions of the Corpus Christi area within the city or from locations within the city to locations outside the city, and shall not include the basic provisions of taxicab service or airport limousine service or charter bus service. Sightseeing service defined herein shall refer to transportation provided in vehicles owned by the permit holder. Sec. 57-165. - Operator permit — Required. It shall be unlawful for any person, as owner or agent, to be engaged in the business of providing limousine or sightseeing service within the city or from locations within the city to locations outside the city, unless the owner of the business holds a current limousine or sightseeing permit issued pursuant to this article. Sec. 57-166. - Same—Application; fee. (a) Every person desiring to engage in the business of operating any limousine or sightseeing service shall make application, in writing, to the city manager or his designated representative on a form provided for that purpose for a permit to engage in the business specified. Such application shall contain the name, address and 32 telephone number of the true owner of the business and the number, types and seating capacity of each vehicle to be operated; shall be sworn to by the applicant; and shall be accompanied by an application and permit fee of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00). (b) The city manager or his designated representative shall issue a permit to all applicants complying with the provisions of this article and shall issue a permit for the operation of all vehicles complying with the requirements of this article. No permit shall be issued unless every vehicle proposed to be used complies with the following minimum requirements: (1) Each vehicle shall comply with all the safety requirements imposed by all state, federal or local laws applicable to the vehicle involved. (2) The owner shall have rendered each vehicle for which a permit is sought for ad valorem taxation and shall have paid all delinquent tax charges owing the city upon every such vehicle. (c) No limousine or sightseeing operator permit holder shall be issued, nor shall such permit be valid after issuance, unless the applicant or the holder of the permit is at all times insured by a comprehensive business auto policy to include collision, uninsured motorists and personal injury protection coverage for each vehicle with minimum limits of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) to any claimant for bodily injury arising out of a single occurrence, three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000.00) for any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence, and fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) to any claimant for any number of claims for damage to or destruction of property. Each insurance policy shall require that the insurer notify the city at least ten (10) days before any cancellation, material change, or intent not to renew by either the insurer or the insured. Cancellation of a certificate holder's or owner's insurance without an approved replacement policy in place at the time cancellation automatically suspends the operations of the vehicle for hire company. (d) The taxicab inspector shall inspect every limousine or sightseeing vehicle to be operated as limousine or sightseeing service at least once a year for the purpose of determining whether such vehicle is in a safe condition to be operated as a limousine or sightseeing vehicle. The holder of a limousine or sightseeing service permit shall submit such limousine or sightseeing vehicle to the taxicab inspector for inspection at the time and place specified by the inspector in accordance with provisions and fees for the inspection of taxicabs in section 57-80. The operator of a limousine or sightseeing service and limousine or sightseeing vehicle is responsible for the safe condition and operation of said vehicles and the city, by establishing this permit system, in no way assumes any duty or liability for the safety of said vehicle. (e) Every person driving a limousine or sightseeing vehicle in the city must have applied for and obtained a limousine or sightseeing driver's permit from the taxicab inspector. It shall be unlawful for any permitted limousine or sightseeing service operator in the city to permit any person to drive a limousine or sightseeing vehicle unless such person shall have a valid driver's permit duly issued by the taxicab inspector in accordance with this chapter. 33 Sec. 57-167. Charge for regulation and use of streets Permit Fee; payments. (a) Applicant shall elect the fee imposed for a Permit issued pursuant to this article at the time of application or renewal. The fee imposed for a Permit issued shall be in an amount equal to 2% of the annual gross receipts for the operation of each limousine or sightseeing service operated for the Certificate holder oraddition to all ower each six (6) months the sum of two hundred dollars ($200.00) times the number of vehicles to be operated as identified in the permit application for the expense of regulating the activities of such service and as a ;trect use permit fee. (b) The semiannual fee for the first six (6) calendar months of each year shall be paid on or before January 10 and for the second six (6) calendar months of each year shall be paid on or before July 10. A latc fcc of twcnty (20) per ccnt will be applicd to latc payments made after January 10 and July 10. (c) Such payments shall be in addition to all ad valorem taxes upon the value of the property of the person operating such vehicles, and in addition to all lawful occupation taxes imposed upon the occupation or calling of the entity operating such vehicle. (d) If a limousine service experience's peak demand periods requiring more vehicles than are designated in its permit agreement or certificate of operation, the holder may request supplemental vehicles by submitting a written application for a supplemental operating permit, along with proof of insurance, which shall state the reason why supplemental vehicles are needed and identify the vehicles to be used. Supplemental vehicles authorized by a supplemental operating permit: (1) Must comply with the vehicle requirements of this chapter; (2) Must comply with the insurance requirements of this chapter; (3) Vehicles that are utilizing a supplemental permit are exempt from any vehicle ownership requirements, but must comply with all other requirements of this chapter; (4) The applicant must pay the supplemental operating permit fee of ten dollars ($10.00) per day in advance of the use of said supplemental permit; (5) A limousine service that utilizes a supplemental vehicle that is not in compliance with section 57-167 of this chapter shall be in violation of section 57- 165 of this chapter; 34 (6) A limousine service or the operating permit holder that has been convicted of or it's permit suspended for a violation of section 57-167(d) shall no longer be authorized the use of supplemental operating permits. Sec. 57-168. - Service standards. The permit holder shall provide and maintain modern efficient service during the life of the permit and failure to provide and maintain such efficient service shall be grounds for forfeiture of the permit herein granted. Said permit is granted for a five-year period. No assignment of a permit shall become effective unless said assignment is approved by the city manager or his designated representative in writing. Sec. 57-169. - Special regulations for horse-drawn carriages. Any sightseeing permit issued pursuant to this article involving the use of horse- drawn carriages as a means of conveyance shall include regulations promulgated by the city manager, or his designated representative, relating to the following: (a) Limitations on the specific streets which may be utilized by horse-drawn carriages and the hours of operations allowed. (b) Safety requirements pertaining to reflectors, warning devices and other safety equipment used on the vehicles, and the types and design of wheels and horse shoes which may be utilized. (c) Sanitation procedures to ensure the cleanliness of streets and public ways and the proper disposal of waste. (d) Health regulations safeguarding the care, feeding and watering of the horses or other draft animals employed by the operator. (e) Additional insurance requirements supplementing the minimum limits for automobile and general liability insurance required for limousine and sightseeing operations generally. (f) Any other rules, regulations or procedures which the city manager, or his designated representative, deems necessary to maintain adequate safeguards for the operation of horse-drawn carriages on the public streets not inconsistent with this section. SECTION 3. Chapter 57, Section 57-284 is revised to read as follows: Sec. 57-284. - Transportation network company permit fee. (a) TNC sham eject the gee iii`ipu a iui pursuant to this article at the time of application or renewal of permit. The fee imposed for a permit issued 35 pursuant to this article shall be in an amount equal to 2% of the annual gross receipts for the operation of each transportation network vehicle operated by each permittee or based on the number of transportation network vehicles operated by each permittee for each quarter as shown below: (i) $400 quarterly for four or fewer vehicles (ii) $800 quarterly for five to eight vehicles. (iii) $1,200 quarterly for nine to twelve vehicles (iv) $1,600 quarterly for thirteen to sixteen vehicles. (v) $2,000 quarterly for seventeen to twenty vehicles (vi) $2,400 quarterly for twenty-one to twenty-four vehicles (vii) $2,800 quarterly for twenty-five to twenty-eight vehicles (viii) $3,200 quarterly for twenty-nine to thirty-two vehicles (ix) $3,600 quarterly for thirty-three or more vehicles (b) The fee provided in subsection (a) of this section shall be paid quarterly as follows: on or after January 1 and before January 10; on or after April 1 and before April 10; on or after July 1 and before July 10; on or after October 1 and before October 10. to thc city on a quarterly basis on or bcforc thc 1Q ' day following thc close of thc calendar month for which thc quarterly payment is calculated. (c) (1) 2% of Annual Gross Receipts The initial payment shall cover the period beginning from the date the permit was issued to the permittee. Upon the submission of each quarterly payment, the permittee shall file with the taxicab inspector a financial report itemizing the components of the permittee's gross receipts for the payment period. All permittees shall utilize any forms promulgated by the taxicab inspector for the submission of the required financial reports and shall submit the financial reports in accordance with any instructions, rules, or regulations promulgated by the taxicab inspector. (2) Number of Transportation Network Vehicles - The initial payment for a fee based on the number of transportation network vehicles operated shall be prorated on a monthly basis to cover the period beginning from the date the certificate was issued to the permittee. (d) Upon 10 days' notice to the permittee, the taxicab inspector shall have the right to inspect the permittee's records the taxicab inspector deems necessary and appropriate to determine that the permittee is in compliance with the requirements of this section. 36 (e) The fees established in this section shall be payable in addition to any other applicable fees imposed by this Code or other ordinances of the city. (t) the permittee shall tail to comply with any requirement herein or shall willfully tile any false statements, the same shall be cause for a suspension or revocation of the permit authorizing the permittee to operate a TNC within the city. SECTION 4. Chapter 57, Section 57-294 is revised to read as follows: Sec. 57-294. - Transportation network vehicles—Inspections. (a) Prior to using any transportation network vehicic, and annually thercaftcr, a permittee or taxicab inspcctor upon rcqucst. The inspcction shall bc madc to dctcrminc that thc transportation network vehicle is in a rcasonably good state of repair, cican, and cquippcd and bcing operatcd in compliancc with all rcquircmcnts of this articic. Inspcctions shall includc, but not bc limitcd to, thc following itcms: (1) (2) (3) (I1) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Foot brakcs; Parking brakcs; Stccring mcchanism; Windshicld; Rcar window and other glass; Windshicld wipers; Hcadlights; Tail lights; Turn indicator lights; (10)Stop lights; (12)Doors (opcn, closc, lock); (13)Horn; (1 11 )Spccdomctcr; (15)Bumpers; (17)Condition of tires, including trcad dcpth; 37 (20)Hcating, vcntilation and air conditioning systcms. (b) Upon passing thc inspcction prcscribcd in subscction (a)-ef--t#is scction, thc taxicab inspcctor shall issuc one ccrtification dccal for thc transportation nctwork vchicic. Thc nctwork vchicic dcsignatcd by thc taxicab inspcctor. Thc permittcc and thc scction. (a) A transportation network vehicle must have a valid State of Texas registration sticker. (b) An offense under this section shall be punishable by a fine of not less than $250.00, nor more than the maximum amount established by law, for each violation.. SECTION 5. This ordinance takes effect after official publication. SECTION 6. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance, for it is the definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision hereof be given full force and effect for its purpose. SECTION 7. Penalties are as provided in Section 1-6 of the Code of Ordinances. SECTION 8. Publication shall be made one time in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. 38 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Brian Rosas Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Michael Hunter Mark Scott Chad Magill Carolyn Vaughn Colleen McIntyre PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor 39 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of July 19, 2016 DATE: June 24, 2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, Interim City Manager FROM: Fred A. Segundo, Director of Aviation 289-0171 ext.1213 FredS@cctexas.com Amending Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinance to allow for Transportation Network Companies (TNC) to operate at Corpus Christi International Airport. CAPTION: Ordinance amending Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances to establish provisions for transportation network companies and transportation network drivers to operate at the Corpus Christi International Airport; and providing for penalties, severance, publication, and an effective date. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: On May 10, 2016, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 030788, amending Chapter 57 of the Corpus Christi Code of Ordinances to allow for permitting and operation of Transportation Network Companies (TNC) within the city limits. TNC offer/provide a pre -arranged transportation service for compensation using an internet-enabled application or digital platform to connect customers with a network driver. Chapter 57, Section 57-296 (b) — Transportation network drivers — Additional operating requirements stipulates that TNC drivers cannot operate on any portion of Corpus Christi International Airport without proper authorization pursuant to Chapter 9 — Aviation- of the Code of Ordinances. Section 57-296 (b) further requires TNC to pay an airport user fee as established in Chapter 9. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations require consistent, non-discriminatory charges for leases, fees and rates for airport tenants and customers. Accordingly, under Chapter 9, Staff is proposing that TNC enter into an airport twelve month operating agreement that includes a proposed annual operating fee of $600. In addition, a $2.00 trip charged will be assessed by CCIA on TNC drivers/vehicles that is consistent with unpermitted taxicab pre -arranged trip charges. CCIA will require a geofence technology application with Staff currently pursuing options. A geofence is a virtual perimeter, consisting of defined geographic boundaries, using a global positioning system (GPS) to track and report TNC activity. If CCIA is unable to secure the geofence, the TNC shall create a geofence for that purpose. ALTERNATIVES: No viable alternatives exist other than prohibiting TNC from operating at CCIA which could negatively impact customers. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Not applicable EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal Financial Services Management and Budget FINANCIAL IMPACT: Revenue Fiscal Year: 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $8,404,296 $8,404,296 Encumbered / Expended Amount 0 0 This item 10,000 10,000 BALANCE $8,414,296 $8,414,296 Fund(s): Airport Fund - 4610 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance as presented. Airport Board unanimously recommend a $2.00 trip fee and curbside pickup LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Geofence Exhibit Ground Transportation Vehicle Parking Locations Exhibit Ordinance amending Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances to establish provisions for transportation network companies and transportation network drivers to operate at the Corpus Christi International Airport; and providing for penalties, severance, publication, and an effective date. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI: Section 1. Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances, entitled "Aviation", is amended by adding new section 9-61.1, entitled "Transportation Network Operations", to establish provisions for transportation network companies and transportation network drivers to operate at the Corpus Christi International Airport, to read as follows: "Section 9-61.1. Transportation Network Company Airport Operations." "(a) Definitions. For the purposes of this section only, the following terms shall have the meanings specified below unless otherwise indicated herein: "Airport complex means the area, buildings, and roadways within the boundary of the airport's geofence property, as designated by the director for transportation network operational purposes. The director may promulgate a map or other description of the airport complex, and it shall be a presumption that the boundaries of the airport complex are as so promulgated by the director. "Airport TNC operating agreement means an agreement entered into between the airport director and a commercial business entity to conduct transportation network operations by a transportation network company, through the use of one or more transportation network drivers, to authorize and provide transportation network services on the airport complex, in exchange for the payment of airport use fees and other applicable charges by the director. "Airport use fee includes all fees and charges required to be paid under or pursuant to this section and arising under an airport TNC operating agreement, including airport operating fees and trip fees. "Applicable regulations means all of the provisions of this chapter, all other applicable ordinances, rules, and regulations of the city and the airport that apply to all ground transportation providers, including transportation network companies, vehicles, and drivers, operating on airport property or conducting activities at the airport. Page 1 of 5 "Automated vehicle identification (AVI) system means a system consisting of vehicle transponders, radio-frequency identification, antennas, computer software and industry -specific hardware to facilitate billing, reporting, invoicing, security and access control, and compliance enforcement for transportation network vehicles. "Geofence means a virtual perimeter, consisting of defined geographical boundaries, which uses a global positioning system, radio frequency identification, or other technology to track and report vehicle location and activity on airport property and may operate as a component of the airport's AVI system. "Passenger means any person picked up by a transportation network driver from the airport complex. "Regulatory approval means all permits, licenses, certificates, registrations, and other approvals required by applicable regulations. "Transportation network company has the meaning provided in section 57-282 of this Code and may be interchangeably referred to in this section as a TNC. "Transportation network driver has the meaning provided in section 57-282 of this Code. "Transportation network service has the meaning provided in section 57-282 of this Code. "Transportation network vehicle has the meaning provided in section 57-282 of this Code and, for purposes of this section, specifically includes vehicles authorized and operating under a valid airport TNC operating agreement. "(b) Transportation network company operations. "(1) A transportation network company must enter into an airport TNC operating agreement, executed by the director, and be at all times in compliance with the terms and conditions of the airport TNC operating agreement in order to operate at the airport. The airport TNC operating agreement may include the payment of a separate, annual airport operating fee of $600 to offset the cost of AVI and geofence technology applications, administration of the agreement, and other airport costs in connection with each agreement including, Page 2 of 5 but not limited to, monthly and annual reporting required to be submitted by each transportation network company to the airport. "(2) In addition to an executed airport TNC operating agreement and the provisions of this section, transportation network companies, their drivers, and their drivers' vehicles must be in compliance with all applicable requirements of chapter 57 of this Code in order to operate on airport property. "(3) Transportation network drivers must provide transportation network services under an authorized transportation network company's airport TNC operating agreement and must hold a valid vehicle for hire permit issued under chapter 57 of the Code in order to operate at the airport. Each passenger picked up within the geofence area or airport complex by a transportation network driver is subject to an airport use fee, to be paid pursuant to the transportation network company's airport TNC operating agreement. "(4) Transportation network drivers waiting for a fare through a transportation network company's internet-enabled mobile or digital platform shall wait in the designated area of the airport complex, if available, or shall wait outside the geofence. Drivers shall not wait in any areas leased or managed by airport tenants and shall not park in any areas which impede vehicle ingress or egress to the airport complex. "(5) Transportation network drivers may pick up passengers for whom transportation network services have been pre -arranged by a transportation network company's internet-enabled or mobile application technology only at designated transportation network pick-up areas at the airport complex as designated by the director and published in the airport's ground transportation rules and regulations. "(c) Geofence required. Unless a geofence technology application is adopted and in use by the airport, a transportation network company shall create, or have created, and maintain a geofence technology application that complies with the airport's operating instructions to track and report the monthly activity of transportation network drivers and vehicles operating at the airport. A transportation network company's internet- enabled or mobile application technology must not show available vehicles within the geofence boundaries at the airport, except in designated transportation network vehicle waiting areas. A transportation network company's internet-enabled or mobile application technology must capture Page 3 of 5 vehicle movements into and out of the geofence boundaries, to allow for tracking of trips from the airport. Each transportation network company shall (i) demonstrate to the director that the airport's designated geofenced area has been incorporated into its internet-enabled or mobile application technology and (ii) ensure transportation network drivers comply with all regulatory approvals required to provide transportation network service as well as other applicable regulations. In the event the airport adopts for use its own geofence technology application, the airport's application shall be used as the primary geofence technology application by every transportation network company operating at the airport on and after the date of its adoption. "(d) Payment of trip fees. Transportation network companies shall pay an airport trip fee of $2.00 per passenger picked up by each transportation network driver authorized and providing service under the transportation network company's airport TNC operating agreement. Trip fees are assessed each time a transportation network driver enters the airport's geofence boundary for the purpose of picking up a passenger, and each such entry is presumed to be for the purpose of picking up a passenger unless the airport is notified otherwise in advance. Fees must be remitted by each transportation network company to the airport based upon monthly accumulated trip fees and are due on the 10th day of every month next following the month in which the trips are completed. Transportation network companies shall remit payment to the airport electronically either by wire transfer or by automated clearing house (ACH) payments to the city bank account designated by the director." Section 2. If, for any reason, any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance for it is the definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance be given full force and effect for its purpose. Section 3. Publication must be made one time in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. Section 4. This ordinance takes effect after official publication. Page 4 of 5 The foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Rudy Garza Michael Hunter Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Brian Rosas Lucio Rubio Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughn The foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 20 , by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Rudy Garza Michael Hunter Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Brian Rosas Lucio Rubio Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughn PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 2016 ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor Page 5 of 5 Exhibit A CCIA Geo -Fence T2T47333'N G 971042.02'W T27'46'57.65% ONG97'3O41.74"W EAT 27.4652.2TN LANG 9r3012TW LAT 27'46'46.03"N LONG 9T3079.62'W A LAT 27'46'46.78"N CNG 97'30'28.73"W LAT 27'46'45.59'N LONG 9710'17.35"W T 2r4644.75% G 97101831V LAT 27'4649.75"N LONG 9730'6.96'W LA72T46"48.84'N LONG 9r306.83'W LAT 2746'49.85"N LONG 9730'3.17N1 LAT 274648.771N LONG 9T2916.66'W LAT 27'46'46.22"N LONG 9T30'1.86'W • LAT 2746'43.94"N LONG 971O3.28'W LAT 27'46'46.16"N LONG 97'29'56.46'W LAT 21.4643.99"N LONG 97'30169"W LAT 27'46'33.04"N LONG 9710'1914"W ■• {i. 4i '`.1 (� '� L.44Q . A A4 -c` y„10;JCLAT 27'46'33.31'N SL;�+]fT' ALONG 9r30'3.90'W LAT 27'46'33.43'N LCNG 97'30'2.30"W' LAT 27'4618 73"N T 27.46'28.601N LONG 97'30'1354"W ! LONG 97'301.8OW Designated Areas for TNC Driver pick-up shall be set by the Director of Aviation and published in the CCIA Ground Transportation Rules and Regulations. Taxi Queueing Area Hotel Shuttle P Commercial Pick Up L»iriti- uig MWWU@U1UWu15U111N1n1UIlUIIUInYLfn1UIf11iUWll — Limousine/Scheduled ckup Pickup Taxi j Pick-up + TNC Curb Side Pick-up 1 i i 7 — i — — 4P:\— /IT AN /Il f � il COMMERCIAL LANE 1 1111 1 1 W4 14 I [NI ICE ICE --___— 1 1 1 T INTERNATIONAL DR. 111 .o, III ,oIh.1ohI1. ®ACE ENT--' ENTRANCE €NTPPIU.4 ENTRANCE � u rI 1� �l.::N:w X61 r:.:��— ----. �, It 1111111/ 111111 III I I 1 I I} wi w�wlr���o, :w al w�r�wra:lwwwr�r�t� ESCA ATOR ESCALATOR I RENTAL CAR : ■ r rI II�� -J IIIII I 1 EAOEAEE 1 1 - �� A V 1 ; 04 1 C _ _ CORPUS CHRISTI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT GROUND TRANSPORTATION PARKING Prepared by, Ga' LOCATIONS Approved by: FRED SEGUNDO Date: Scale: I:SOO 06-20-2016 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council meeting of July 12, 2016 Action Item for the City Council meeting of July 19, 2016 DATE: June 17, 2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, Interim City Manager FROM: Robert Rocha, Fire Chief rrocha@cctexas.com (361) 826-3932 State Homeland Security Grant Application to purchase Man -Portable X-ray Units in the amount of $82,985.59. CAPTION: Resolution ratifying the submission of a grant application in the amount of $82,985.59 to the Office of the Governor for the Man -Portable X-ray Units project; and authorizing the City Manager or the City Manager's designee to accept, reject, alter or terminate the grant. PURPOSE: The purpose of the grant is to carry out homeland security projects that will significantly improve local and regional terrorism prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery capabilities. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: None ALTERNATIVES: Not accepting terms and conditions of the grant will jeopardize the utilization of the grant funds for homeland security projects that will significantly improve local and regional terrorism prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery capabilities. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Council approval to submit grant application. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Staff is requesting a non -emergency reading to this routine, non -controversial item. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal Finance FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital X Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015-2016 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this resolution to submit a grant application to the Office of the Governor for the Man -Portable X-ray Units project in the amount of $82,985.59. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Grant Application Resolution Ratifying the submission of a grant application in the amount of $82,985.59 to the Office of the Governor for the Man -Portable X-ray Units project; and authorizing the City Manager or the City Manager's designee to accept, reject, alter or terminate the grant. WHEREAS, the City of Corpus Christi finds it in the best interest of the citizens of Corpus Christi, that the Man -Portable X-ray Units be utilized for the year of 2017; WHEREAS, the City of Corpus Christi agrees provide applicable matching funds for the said project; WHEREAS, the City of Corpus Christi agrees that in the event of loss or misuse of the Office of the Governor funds, the City of Corpus Christi assures that the funds will be returned to the Office of the Governor in full; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The City Council ratifies submission of a grant application in the amount of $82,985.59 for the Man -Portable X-ray Units project to the Office of the Governor. SECTION 2. The City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, may apply for, accept, reject, alter or terminate the grant. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta Nelda Martinez City Secretary Mayor Grant Number #3137501 Corpus Christi, Texas Page 1 of 2 of The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Rudy Garza Michael Hunter Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Brian Rosas Lucy Rubio Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughn Page 2of2 CBCOG REGION FY16 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROJECT PROPOSAL Applicant (jurisdiction and dept.): City of Corpus Christi, Police Department/Regional Bomb Squad Project Title: _Man -Portable X -Ray Units Type of Project: _X_ Regional Local Top 5 Priority #3 Law Enforcement Project: XYes No Headquarter County (majority of services will be provided in this county): _Nueces Participant(s)—Jurisdiction(s), departments/groups/teams: _This grant will be used by the Corpus Christi Police Department to support their regional response activities that cover a 30 county wide area of south Texas. Project Manager: Name: _Mathew Weischwill Email: MathewW@cctexas.com Phone Number(s): _361-834-4455 Estimated Cost of Project: $_170,881.56 (budget line item details & quotes attached) Select one or more Project Activities which best describe the project and dedicated percentage of activity. Select % of Project Activity Description of Activity Critical Infrastructure Identifying critical infrastructure, collecting and maintaining data, and prioritizing critical infrastructure assets, clusters, and systems. Assessments of critical infrastructure vulnerabilities and interdependencies, particularly those involving multiple sites and/or sectors. Planning, training, exercises, equipment, and modeling enabling responsible jurisdictions to mitigate threats to and vulnerabilities of critical infrastructure facilities, assets, networks, and systems. Analysis of critical infrastructure threats and information sharing with private sector partners. Education and communications to enhance public awareness and increase reporting of suspicious activities related to critical infrastructure. Fusion Center Support for a recognized fusion center (please refer to http://www.dhs.gov/fusion- center-locations-and-contact-information). Intelligence & Information Sharing Projects that enable interdiction and disruption of terrorist activity through enhanced understanding and recognition of pre -operational activity and other crimes that may be precursors or indicators of terrorist activity. Interoperable Communications Building capabilities to meet P-25 standards and sustaining existing capabilities through life cycle replacement of equipment. Operational Coordination Establishing and maintaining a unified and coordinated operational structure and process that integrates critical stakeholders. Includes implementing and enhancing emergency operations centers and conducting or participating in incident management training and/or exercises. State, Regional & Local Planning Development of state and regional risk and preparedness assessments. Core capability development planning, to include typing and tracking of equipment and special response teams. Planning and execution of training and exercises focused on terrorism prevention, protection and response. Multi -jurisdictional operational planning to include plans for regional operational coordination of terrorism prevention, protection, and response capabilities. Maintaining or updating Emergency Operations Plans. Planning and implementation of initiatives (e.g. CERT team training) to enhance the Citizen Corps Program. Public Warning Systems (note: public warning systems must be responsive to terrorism threats). WebEOC and other situational awareness and decision support tools. 1 (% total should equal to 100%): Narrative Information Description of Project and Issues Project will Target: Recent and future special events such as marathons where bomb squads have had a response concern has uncovered the need for responding bomb squads to have a "man -portable" X-ray system to safely examine suspicious packages in an expeditious manner. Systems currently deployed by local bomb squads require external power and a vehicle for transport because of the system's large size. However, man -portable X-ray processors will eliminate that problem and allow bomb technicians to safely and quickly X- ray suspicious packages with minimal disruptions to events. Nationally, bomb squads are being asked to integrate with SWAT teams. A man -portable X-ray system will allow local bomb techs to properly support the tactical mission. This system would also allow the bomb techs to safely and quickly conduct X-rays while supporting their agencies tactical mission. Man -portable X-ray systems are also beneficial for day-to-day operations of local bomb squads. Local squads will have another option for conducting X-rays during routine calls for service where large X-ray processors are either too cumbersome, or not right for the task. Supporting Data — Provide supporting data, including baseline statistics and the sources of data which are pertinent to the grant project and its target area. Do not use statewide data for a local problem or national data for a statewide problem. The Corpus Christi bomb squad is a FEMA Type I team, and it is the only accredited bomb squad south of San Antonio. The team covers the largest land area of any bomb squad in the United States. In 2015, the Corpus Christi bomb squad received 106 calls for service. Thirteen of these calls were for suspicious packages. The bomb squad also received 12 calls for pieces of military ordinance and eight requests to assist the SWAT team with entries. All of these situations requried X-ray capabilities. The calls regarding a suspicious package had to be completed using the older equipment that requires a large response truck and several additional hours. The calls for military ordinance and SWAT assists had to be completed without this tool. The equipment requested will help the squad maintain FEMA Type I status, improve response times, and ensure the safety of the technicians. Goal Statement — Provide a brief description of the overall goals and objectives for this project. The goal of this project is to provide each member of the bomb squad with X-ray equipment. This will allow team members to clear calls in minutes that currently require hours. State and Regional Impact The responses in this section should be consistent with the following: 1. CBCOG Top 5 Priority 2. Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) 3. State Preparedness Report 4. Homeland Security Strategic Plan Implementation Plan (regional projects) 5. Homeland Security Strategic Plan for Texas (state projects) Which CBCOG Top 5 Priority applies to this project? 3 How does the project support the priority? This project will enhance the regional bomb squad's speed and accuracy when responding to calls. The project will provide a man -portable X-ray system for each bomb technician, which will allow the techs to look inside of a bomb and determine the best way to safely dismantle it. The systems will also make it possible to see inside objects such as backpacks left unattended at public 2 Sustaining Special Response Teams CBRNE/WMD detection, HAZMAT response and decontamination, Urban Search and Rescue, SWAT and other tactical teams. Also includes first responder equipment X 100% and First Responder Capabilities sustainment needs, including PPE, WMD Pharmaceuticals, Calibration and maintenance for WMD-related detection and identification systems, and closely related investments to update or sustain current first responder equipment. (% total should equal to 100%): Narrative Information Description of Project and Issues Project will Target: Recent and future special events such as marathons where bomb squads have had a response concern has uncovered the need for responding bomb squads to have a "man -portable" X-ray system to safely examine suspicious packages in an expeditious manner. Systems currently deployed by local bomb squads require external power and a vehicle for transport because of the system's large size. However, man -portable X-ray processors will eliminate that problem and allow bomb technicians to safely and quickly X- ray suspicious packages with minimal disruptions to events. Nationally, bomb squads are being asked to integrate with SWAT teams. A man -portable X-ray system will allow local bomb techs to properly support the tactical mission. This system would also allow the bomb techs to safely and quickly conduct X-rays while supporting their agencies tactical mission. Man -portable X-ray systems are also beneficial for day-to-day operations of local bomb squads. Local squads will have another option for conducting X-rays during routine calls for service where large X-ray processors are either too cumbersome, or not right for the task. Supporting Data — Provide supporting data, including baseline statistics and the sources of data which are pertinent to the grant project and its target area. Do not use statewide data for a local problem or national data for a statewide problem. The Corpus Christi bomb squad is a FEMA Type I team, and it is the only accredited bomb squad south of San Antonio. The team covers the largest land area of any bomb squad in the United States. In 2015, the Corpus Christi bomb squad received 106 calls for service. Thirteen of these calls were for suspicious packages. The bomb squad also received 12 calls for pieces of military ordinance and eight requests to assist the SWAT team with entries. All of these situations requried X-ray capabilities. The calls regarding a suspicious package had to be completed using the older equipment that requires a large response truck and several additional hours. The calls for military ordinance and SWAT assists had to be completed without this tool. The equipment requested will help the squad maintain FEMA Type I status, improve response times, and ensure the safety of the technicians. Goal Statement — Provide a brief description of the overall goals and objectives for this project. The goal of this project is to provide each member of the bomb squad with X-ray equipment. This will allow team members to clear calls in minutes that currently require hours. State and Regional Impact The responses in this section should be consistent with the following: 1. CBCOG Top 5 Priority 2. Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) 3. State Preparedness Report 4. Homeland Security Strategic Plan Implementation Plan (regional projects) 5. Homeland Security Strategic Plan for Texas (state projects) Which CBCOG Top 5 Priority applies to this project? 3 How does the project support the priority? This project will enhance the regional bomb squad's speed and accuracy when responding to calls. The project will provide a man -portable X-ray system for each bomb technician, which will allow the techs to look inside of a bomb and determine the best way to safely dismantle it. The systems will also make it possible to see inside objects such as backpacks left unattended at public 2 events. This allows a bomb squad to do a faster and more complete search to find IEDs before they explode and cause injury. Describe the threats and hazards that create the need for the project. Include reference to page(s) of regional THIRA, if applicable: THIRA Page(s) Description of Threats and Hazards 2 Human Caused — Explosive Devices (IED, VBIED, SBIED) Describe the capability gap(s) which will be addressed by the project. Include reference to page(s) of regional SPR, if applicable: SPR Page(s) Description of Capability Gaps 25-27 Screening, Search, and Detection Core Capability- Equipment 69-70 On -scene Security and Protection Core Capability- Equipment Explain how the project will reduce the capability gap(s): The project will equip all bomb squad members with current X-ray technology. Currently, the squad has one large unit that must be staged at the substation and can only be brought out with the large response vehicle. Portable X-ray systems will provide faster response times and enhanced safety to the public and bomb technicians. Describe existing capability levels and what is or will be in place to support the investment prior to the use of these grant funds if awarded: All Members of the bomb squad are trained on how to use and maintain X-ray equipment. Each member of the squad has a department issued take-home unit. The requested equipment will be carried with each technician in the department vehicle. It will be accessible for quick deployment at any time or location. Explain the long-term approach to sustaining the capabilities developed by this project to include the need for future grant funding, if applicable: This equipment will not require any further funding. The system comes with all parts needed to be functional for many years. Any small costs for things such as batteries or minor repairs will be paid for out of the department's normal budget. Provide an explanation of the regional and/or statewide impact of this project: The Corpus Christi Police Department Bomb Squad is a regional response team that covers an area of South Texas that is 30 counties wide. This equipment will help the bomb squad collect evidence, search for, detect, and interdict CBRNE devices from terrorist attacks. The portable X-ray systems will also provide faster response times, which will greatly increase capabilities that will be available to all of the cities and counties in the 30 county -wide areas. 3 BUDGET LINE ITEM DETAILS QTY/% OF SALARY ITEM DESCRIPTION COST EACH TOTAL COST 4 FPX NANO X -Ray System With Source $42,720.39 $170,881.56 $39,360.02 Y 2013 SHSP P05 CBCOG City of Corpus Christi MMRS Planning $37,843.38 Y 2013 SHSP PO2LE SHSP CBCOG City of Corpus Christi Regional Bomb Squad Equipment $20,890.48 Y 2013 SHSP SO2 CBCOG City of Corpus Christi EOC Video Screens $28,713.69 TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 170,881.56 ATTACH ESTIMATED QUOTE(S) 2013-2015 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT HISTORY YEAR GRANT PROJECT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AWARDED COMPLETE Y/N 2013 SHSP SO1 CBCOG City of Corpus Christi Regional Response Teams Support and Training Project $39,360.02 Y 2013 SHSP P05 CBCOG City of Corpus Christi MMRS Planning $37,843.38 Y 2013 SHSP PO2LE SHSP CBCOG City of Corpus Christi Regional Bomb Squad Equipment $20,890.48 Y 2013 SHSP SO2 CBCOG City of Corpus Christi EOC Video Screens $28,713.69 Y 2013 SHSP LETPA PO2LE CBCOG City of Corpus Christi Regional Bomb Squad Equipment $38,598.00 Y 2014 SHSP P10 Corpus Christi Hazmat Equipment $59,208.82 N 2014 SHSP SO1 Corpus Christi EOC Equipment $28,080.27 Y 2014 SHSP SO2 Corpus Christi MMRS Planning $20,427.59 Y 2014 SHSP SO4 Corpus Christi Search and Rescue Equipment $53,448.32 Y 2014 SHSP LETPA PO1LE Corpus Christi Dive Team Training $50,028.00 N 2014 SHSP LETPA PO3LE Corpus Christi Bomb Squad Equipment $23,207.00 Y Provide an explanation for each project not completed: 2014 SHSP: Air Monitoring Filters are on -order. Full amount of award was not used. 2014 SHSP LETPA: Full amount of award was not used. 2015 HSGP: Fund holds exist for 2015 projects. Purchasing process will begin as soon as holds are removed. 4 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of July 19, 2016 DATE: June 17, 2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, Interim City Manager FROM: Robert Rocha, Fire Chief rrocha@cctexas.com (361) 826-3932 State Homeland Security Grant Application to purchase SWAT Ballistic Protection Equipment in the amount of $181,873.20 CAPTION: Resolution ratifying the submission of a grant application in the amount of $181,873.20 to the Office of the Governor for the SWAT Ballistic Protection Equipment project; and authorizing the City Manager or the City Manager's designee to accept, reject, alter or terminate the grant. PURPOSE: The purpose of the grant is to carry out homeland security projects that will significantly improve local and regional terrorism prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery capabilities. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: None ALTERNATIVES: Not accepting terms and conditions of the grant will jeopardize the utilization of the grant funds for homeland security projects that will significantly improve local and regional terrorism prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery capabilities. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Council approval to submit grant application. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Staff is requesting a non -emergency reading to this routine, non -controversial item. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal Finance FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital X Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015-2016 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this resolution to submit a grant application to the Office of the Governor for the SWAT Ballistic Protection Equipment in the amount of $181,873.20. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Grant Application Resolution ratifying the submission of a grant application in the amount of $181,873.20 to the Office of the Governor for the SWAT Ballistic Protection Equipment project; and authorizing the City Manager or the City Manager's designee to accept, reject, alter or terminate the grant. WHEREAS, the City of Corpus Christi finds it in the best interest of the citizens of Corpus Christi, that the SWAT Ballistic Protection Equipment be utilized for the year of 2017; WHEREAS, the City of Corpus Christi agrees provide applicable matching funds for the said project; WHEREAS, the City of Corpus Christi agrees that in the event of loss or misuse of the Office of the Governor funds, the City of Corpus Christi assures that the funds will be returned to the Office of the Governor in full; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The City Council ratifies the submission a grant application in the amount of $181,873.20 for the SWAT Ballistic Protection Equipment project to the Office of the Governor. SECTION 2. The City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, may apply for, accept, reject, alter or terminate the grant. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta Nelda Martinez City Secretary Mayor Grant Number #3137501 Page 1 of 2 Corpus Christi, Texas of The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Rudy Garza Michael Hunter Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Brian Rosas Lucy Rubio Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughn Page 2 of 2 CBCOG REGION FY16 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROJECT PROPOSAL Applicant (jurisdiction and dept.): _City of Corpus Christi/Police Department, Emergency Response Unit Project Title: SWAT Ballistic Protection Type of Project: _X_ Regional Local Top 5 Priority # 3 Law Enforcement Project: XYes No Headquarter County (majority of services will be provided in this county): _Nueces Participant(s)—Jurisdiction(s), departments/groups/teams: This grant will be used by the Corpus Christi Police Department Emergency Response Unit —SWAT Team. The team serves high risk warrants for surrounding smaller agencies and responds to critical incidents at the request of area agencies. Project Manager: Name: William Breedlove Email: Williamb@cctexas.com Phone Number(s): _361-834-4455 Estimated Cost of Project: $ 181,873 (budget line item details & quotes attached) Select one or more Project Activities which best describe the project and dedicated percentage of activity. Select % of Project Activity Description of Activity Critical Infrastructure Identifying critical infrastructure, collecting and maintaining data, and prioritizing critical infrastructure assets, clusters, and systems. Assessments of critical infrastructure vulnerabilities and interdependencies, particularly those involving multiple sites and/or sectors. Planning, training, exercises, equipment, and modeling enabling responsible jurisdictions to mitigate threats to and vulnerabilities of critical infrastructure facilities, assets, networks, and systems. Analysis of critical infrastructure threats and information sharing with private sector partners. Education and communications to enhance public awareness and increase reporting of suspicious activities related to critical infrastructure. Fusion Center Support for a recognized fusion center (please refer to http://www.dhs.gov/fusion- center-locations-and-contact-information). Intelligence & Information Sharing Projects that enable interdiction and disruption of terrorist activity through enhanced understanding and recognition of pre -operational activity and other crimes that may be precursors or indicators of terrorist activity. Interoperable Communications Building capabilities to meet P-25 standards and sustaining existing capabilities through life cycle replacement of equipment. Operational Coordination Establishing and maintaining a unified and coordinated operational structure and process that integrates critical stakeholders. Includes implementing and enhancing emergency operations centers and conducting or participating in incident management training and/or exercises. State, Regional & Local Planning Development of state and regional risk and preparedness assessments. Core capability development planning, to include typing and tracking of equipment and special response teams. Planning and execution of training and exercises focused on terrorism prevention, protection and response. Multi -jurisdictional operational planning to include plans for regional operational coordination of terrorism prevention, protection, and response capabilities. Maintaining or updating Emergency Operations Plans. Planning and implementation of initiatives (e.g. CERT team training) to enhance the Citizen Corps Program. Public Warning Systems (note: public warning systems must be responsive to terrorism threats). WebEOC and other situational awareness and decision support tools. 1 (% total should equal to 100%): Narrative Information Description of Project and Issues Project will Target: Recent terrorist and active shooter incidents have included improvised explosive devices targeting citizens and first responders. Since current ballistic protection for the Corpus Christi Police Department (CCPD) SWAT team will expire at the end of this year, there will be a need to continue with a level of protection that will ensure the safety of SWAT officers responding to high-risk incidents and warrants such as encountering IEDs. Supporting Data — Provide supporting data, including baseline statistics and the sources of data which are pertinent to the grant project and its target area. Do not use statewide data for a local problem or national data for a statewide problem. In 2015, the SWAT team was operational 41 times. Twenty-five operations were high-risk warrants and one of them occurred in Robstown, Texas. The team also responded to 10 high-risk barricade or hostage situations. The SWAT team has provided security for six events, including the visit of former first lady Bush due to a terroristic threat made on the venue a day before the planned visit. The SWAT team has also worked with the bomb squad on eight of these operations. Goal Statement — Provide a brief description of the overall goals and objectives for this project. The goal of this project is to provide each member of the SWAT team adequate ballistic protection. State and Regional Impact The responses in this section should be consistent with the following: 1. CBCOG Top 5 Priority 2. Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) 3. State Preparedness Report 4. Homeland Security Strategic Plan Implementation Plan (regional projects) 5. Homeland Security Strategic Plan for Texas (state projects) Which CBCOG Top 5 Priority applies to this project? 3 How does the project support the priority? This project will enhance the SWAT team by providing the ability to respond to high-risk incidents with appropriate ballistic protection. Describe the threats and hazards that create the need for the project. Include reference to page(s) of regional THIRA, if applicable: THIRA Page(s) Description of Threats and Hazards 2 Human Caused — Explosive Devices (IED, VBIED, SBIED) Describe the capability gap(s) which will be addressed by the project. Include reference to page(s) of regional SPR, if applicable: 2 Sustaining Special Response Teams CBRNE /WMD detection, HAZMAT response and decontamination, Urban Search and Rescue, SWAT and other tactical teams. Also includes first responder equipment X 100% and First Responder Capabilities sustainment needs, including PPE, WMD Pharmaceuticals, Calibration and maintenance for WMD-related detection and identification systems, and closely related investments to update or sustain current first responder equipment. (% total should equal to 100%): Narrative Information Description of Project and Issues Project will Target: Recent terrorist and active shooter incidents have included improvised explosive devices targeting citizens and first responders. Since current ballistic protection for the Corpus Christi Police Department (CCPD) SWAT team will expire at the end of this year, there will be a need to continue with a level of protection that will ensure the safety of SWAT officers responding to high-risk incidents and warrants such as encountering IEDs. Supporting Data — Provide supporting data, including baseline statistics and the sources of data which are pertinent to the grant project and its target area. Do not use statewide data for a local problem or national data for a statewide problem. In 2015, the SWAT team was operational 41 times. Twenty-five operations were high-risk warrants and one of them occurred in Robstown, Texas. The team also responded to 10 high-risk barricade or hostage situations. The SWAT team has provided security for six events, including the visit of former first lady Bush due to a terroristic threat made on the venue a day before the planned visit. The SWAT team has also worked with the bomb squad on eight of these operations. Goal Statement — Provide a brief description of the overall goals and objectives for this project. The goal of this project is to provide each member of the SWAT team adequate ballistic protection. State and Regional Impact The responses in this section should be consistent with the following: 1. CBCOG Top 5 Priority 2. Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) 3. State Preparedness Report 4. Homeland Security Strategic Plan Implementation Plan (regional projects) 5. Homeland Security Strategic Plan for Texas (state projects) Which CBCOG Top 5 Priority applies to this project? 3 How does the project support the priority? This project will enhance the SWAT team by providing the ability to respond to high-risk incidents with appropriate ballistic protection. Describe the threats and hazards that create the need for the project. Include reference to page(s) of regional THIRA, if applicable: THIRA Page(s) Description of Threats and Hazards 2 Human Caused — Explosive Devices (IED, VBIED, SBIED) Describe the capability gap(s) which will be addressed by the project. Include reference to page(s) of regional SPR, if applicable: 2 SPR Page(s) Description of Capability Gaps 69-70 On -scene Security and Protection Core Capability Explain how the project will reduce the capability gap(s): The project will allow for updated protective clothing for the SWAT team members responding to dangerous situations without losing any capabilities. Describe existing capability levels and what is or will be in place to support the investment prior to the use of these grant funds if awarded: All SWAT officers are trained and qualified through the Texas Tactical Police Officers Association. The officers also attend 16 hours of training each month. Explain the long-term approach to sustaining the capabilities developed by this project to include the need for future grant funding, if applicable: This equipment has an expiration of five years by NIJ standards. Provide an explanation of the regional and/or statewide impact of this project: The Corpus Christi Police Department SWAT team provides service to the surrounding communities for high-risk incidents. BUDGET LINE ITEM DETAILS QTY/% OF SALARY ITEM DESCRIPTION COST EACH TOTAL COST 36 Ballistic VEST $1,842.50 $66,330.00 36 Collar Protector $134.00 $4,824.00 36 THROAT Protector $120.60 $4,341.60 36 Bicep Protector $502.50 $18,090.00 36 Groin Protector $241.20 20 $8,683.20 36 Police Patch- shoulder $6.70 $241.20 36 Police Patch- Back $6.70 $241.20 72 Level 111 Polyethylene Plate 10X12 $522.60 $37,627.20 36 * DELTA 4 HI CUT COMPLETE Helmet $900.00 $32,400.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 181,873.00 ATTACH ESTIMATED QUOTE(S) 2013-2015 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT HISTORY YEAR GRANT PROJECT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AWARDED COMPLETE Y/N 2013 SHSP SO1 CBCOG City of Corpus Christi Regional Response Teams Support and Training Project $39,360.02 Y 2013 SHSP P05 CBCOG City of Corpus Christi MMRS Planning $37,843.38 Y 3 2013 SHSP P02LE SHSP CBCOG City of Corpus Christi Regional Bomb Squad Equipment $20,890.48 Y 2013 SHSP SO2 CBCOG City of Corpus Christi EOC Video Screens $28,713.69 Y 2013 SHSP LETPA P02LE CBCOG City of Corpus Christi Regional Bomb Squad Equipment $38,598.00 Y 2014 SHSP P10 Corpus Christi Hazmat Equipment $59,208.82 N 2014 SHSP S01 Corpus Christi EOC Equipment $28,080.27 Y 2014 SHSP SO2 Corpus Christi MMRS Planning $20,427.59 Y 2014 SHSP SO4 Corpus Christi Search and Rescue Equipment $53,448.32 Y 2014 SHSP LETPA P01LE Corpus Christi Dive Team Training $50,028.00 N 2014 SHSP LETPA P03LE Corpus Christi Bomb Squad Equipment $23,207.00 Y Provide an explanation for each project not completed: 2014 SHSP: Air Monitoring Filters are on -order. Full amount of award was not used. 2014 SHSP LETPA: Full amount of award was not used. 2015 HSGP: Fund holds exist for 2015 projects. Purchasing process will begin as soon as holds are removed 4 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of July 19, 2016 DATE: July 12, 2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, Interim City Manager FROM: Dan Grimsbo, Interim Director of Water Utilities DanG(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-1718 Maria Pedraza, Procurement Manager Mariape(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-3176 Lease of Six Trucks CAPTION: Motion approving the lease of six trucks from PV Rentals, for the amount of $65,880 based on a cooperative purchasing agreement with the Texas Local Government Purchasing Cooperative, dba BuyBoard, of which $16,470 is required for the remainder of FY 2015-2016. Funds have been budgeted by the Utilities Department. The remaining contract balance will be funded through FY2016-2017. The term of the contract will be for one year with no extensions. PURPOSE: To approve the motion to lease six trucks for the Utilities Department. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: These trucks are needed to continue to meet current service level agreements, directives and operational requirements. These vehicles are used primarily by collection services to complete disconnection/reconnection orders issued by the Utilities Billing Office. ALTERNATIVES: N/A OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: N/A CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This purchase conforms to the City's purchasing policies and procedures and State statutes regulating procurement. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Utilities Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: x Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $2,042,218.77 $49,410.00 $2,091,628.77 Encumbered / Expended Amount $1,290,443.83 $0 $1,290,443.83 This item $16,470.00 $49,410.00 $65,880.00 BALANCE $735,304.94 $0 $735,304.94 Fund(s): Water Fund Comment: The $65,880 financial impact shown above represents the cost of the total contract value. The amount of the contract to be paid in FY2015-2016 is $16,470 from the Water Fund. The remaining contract balance will be funded through the FY2016-2017 budget. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Price sheet CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION BUYER: DOMINGO VALDEZ PRICE SHEET LEASE OF 6 TRUCKS TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT PURCHASING COOPERATIVE BuyBoard Contract No. 489-15 ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT PV Rentals Corpus Christi, TX UNIT PRICE EXTENDED PRICE 1. 2016 V8 Chevy Trucks 6 ea $915 x 12 months $65,880.00 TOTAL $65,880.00 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of July 19, 2016 DATE: July 12, 2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, Interim City Manager FROM: Dan Grimsbo, Interim Director of Water Utilities DanG(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-1718 Maria Pedraza, Procurement Manager MariaPe(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-3176 Liquid Cationic Polymer Supply Agreement CAPTION: Motion approving a Supply Agreement with Polydyne Inc. of Riceboro, Georgia for water treatment chemicals in accordance with Bid Invitation No. 116, based on the lowest responsive, responsible bid for an estimated annual expenditure of $345,390.00 of which $57,565.00 is budgeted by the Water Department for the remainder of FY 2015-2016. The terms of the contract will be for one year with options to extend for up to two additional one year periods, subject to the approval of the Supplier and the City Manager or designee. PURPOSE: Polymer is a coagulant aid chemical used for the treatment of potable drinking water at the O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant. This aid helps bring the particles in the water together to promote better settling in the treatment process. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The option to extend the previous contract has expired. The City is currently purchasing the above chemical on an emergency purchase order. 41 vendors were notified of this bid event via the City's Supplier Portal. Four bid submittals were received, of which three were non-responsive due to the item not carried by vendor or was out of stock at the time the bid was due. ALTERNATIVES: Without polymer being added to the water treatment process the settled water turbidities will be much higher. The effect on the filters would result in higher finished water turbidities, which could result in treatment violations from Regulatory Agency. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: No other product available. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This purchase conforms to the City's purchasing policies and procedures and State statutes regulating procurement. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Water Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: x Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $4,793,426.02 $287,825.00 $5,081,251.02 Encumbered / Expended Amount $3,172,222.97 $3,172,222.97 This item $57,565.00 $287,825.00 $345,390.00 BALANCE $1,563,638.05 $.0 $1,563,638.05 Fund(s): Water Fund Comments: The $57,565.00 financial impact shown above represents two months of expenditures that will be encumbered through the end of this fiscal year. The remaining $287,825.00 for the last nine months of the contract will be requested during the normal FY 2016/2017 budget approval process. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Bid Tabulation Service Agreement Form 1295 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION BUYER: DOMINGO VALDEZ BID TABULATION EVENT 116 Liquid Cationic Polymer Recorded by: Jamye Clark TOTAL: $345,390.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 SNF Polydyne Univar USA, Inc. Ferguson Geo Specialty Chemicals, Inc. Riceboro, Ga Corpus Christi, TX Corpus Christi, TX Deer Park, TX Item Description Qty. Unit Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price 1.0 Liquid Cationic Polymer 435 Wet Ton $794.00 $345,390.00 No Bid No Bid No Bid TOTAL: $345,390.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 SUPPLY AGREEMENT NO. 747 THIS Liquid Cationic Polymer Supply Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between Polydyne Inc. ("Supplier"), of Riceboro, Georgia, and the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation ("City") effective for all purposes upon execution by the City Manager or designee ("City Manager"). WHEREAS, Supplier has bid to provide Liquid Cationic Polymer in response to Request for Bid (RFB) No. 116 in accordance with the Scope of Work including Specification 1181, dated 09/29/2008 which RFB is incorporated by reference in this Agreement as Exhibit "1" and the Bid Response as Exhibit "2"; WHEREAS, the City Council has determined Supplier to be the lowest, responsive, responsible bidder; and NOW, THEREFORE, Supplier and City enter into this Agreement and agree as follows: Scope. Supplier will perform Liquid Cationic Polymer in accordance with the Scope of Work and Specification 1181 as shown in Attachment "A". 2. Term. This Agreement is for one year commencing on the issuance of a notice to proceed. The Agreement includes an option to extend the term for up to two additional one year terms subject to the written approval of the Supplier and the City Manager. 3. Compensation and Payment. The total value of this Agreement is not to exceed $ 345,390.00, subject to extensions and changes. Payment will be made for goods delivered and accepted by the City within 30 days of acceptance and receipt of an acceptable invoice. All pricing must be in accordance with the Pricing/Bid Schedule as shown in Attachment "B". 4. Quality or Quantity Adjustments. Any quantities indicated on the Pricing/Bid Schedule are estimates only and do not obligate the City to order or accept more than the City's actual requirements during the Agreement, nor do the estimates limit the City to ordering less than its actual needs during the Agreement, subject to availability of appropriated funds. Substitutions or deviations from product Page 1 of 7 City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement 5.16.16 requirements or specifications are prohibited without prior written approval of the Contract Administrator 5. Release Order. The City will exercise its right to specify time, place and quantity of products to be delivered in the following manner: Any City department or division may send to Supplier a purchase release order signed by an authorized agent of the department or division. The purchase release order will refer to this Agreement and products will remain with the Supplier until such time as they are delivered and accepted by the City. 6. Inspection and Acceptance. Any products that are delivered but not accepted must be corrected or replaced immediately at no charge to the City or a replacement may be bought on the open market and any costs incurred including additional costs over the item's bid price must be paid by the Contractor within 30 days of receipt of City's invoice. 7. Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this Agreement including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for payment. All of the Supplier's notices or communications regarding this Agreement must be directed to the Contract Administrator or designee, as follows: Contract Administrator Name: Contract Administrator Department: Contractor Administrator Address: Contract Administrator Phone and Fax: William Creech Water Utilities 33101 Leopard Street, Corpus Christi, Texas (361) 826-1954 williamc@cctexas.com 8. Independent Contractor. Supplier will perform the work hereunder as an independent contractor and will furnish such products in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances or conditions may any agent, servant or employee of the Supplier be considered an employee of the City. 9. Insurance. No insurance required for this procurement. 10. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement or any right or interest herein by the Supplier is effective unless the City Manager first gives its written consent to such assignment. The performance of this Page 2 of 7 City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement 5.16.16 Agreement by the Supplier is of the essence of this Agreement and the City's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City on any ground whatsoever. 11. Fiscal Year. All parties recognize that the continuation of any contract after the close of any fiscal year of the City (the City's fiscal year ends on September 30th), is subject to appropriations and budget approval providing for such contract item as an expenditure in said budget. The City does not represent that said budget item will be actually adopted as that determination is within the sole discretion of the City Council at the time of adoption of each budget. 12. Waiver. No waiver of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement, or the Supplier's bid offer waives any subsequent breach of the same. 13. Governing Law. This Agreement is subject to all federal, State, and local laws, rules, and regulations. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of Texas, and such form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district, county or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas. 14. Subcontractors. The Supplier may use subcontractors in connection with the work performed under this Agreement. When using subcontractors, however, the Supplier must obtain prior written approval from the Contract Administrator if the subcontractors were not named at the time of bid. In using subcontractors, the Suppliers is responsible for all their acts and omissions to the same extent as if the subcontractor and its employees were employees of the Supplier. All requirements set forth as part of this Agreement are applicable to all subcontractors and their employees to the same extent as if the Supplier and its employees had performed the work. 15. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by the parties. Such amendment will be in the form of a change order. Change orders may be used to modify quantities as deemed necessary by the City. 16. Termination. The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Supplier's failure to perform the work specified in this Agreement. Failure to keep any required insurance policies in force for the entire term of this Agreement is grounds for termination. The Contract Administrator must give the Supplier 10 days written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Supplier Page 3 of 7 City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement 5.16.16 has not cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. Alternatively, the City may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 30 days written notice to the Supplier. However, the City may terminate this Agreement on 24 hours written notice to the Supplier for failure to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes as set out herein. 17. Taxes. The Supplier covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment taxes and all other related taxes. Upon request, the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of these taxes within 15 days of such request. Failure to pay or provide proof of payment is grounds for the City Manager to immediately terminate this Agreement. 18. Certificate of Interested Parties. Supplier agrees to comply with Texas Government Code Section 2252.908 and complete Form 1295 "Certificate of Interested Parties" as part of this Agreement. 19. Notice. Notice may be given by fax, email, hand delivery or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is received on the day faxed, emailed or hand -delivered and on the third day after deposit if sent certified mail. Notice must be sent as follows: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Attention: William Creech 13101 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, Texas. 78410 FAX: 361-826-1954 EMAIL: williamc@cctexas.com IF TO SUPPLIER Polydyne Inc. Attention: Mark Schiag 1 Chemical Plant Road Riceboro, Georgia 31323 FAX: 912-880-2078 EMAIL: PolybidDpt@snfhc.com Page 4 of 7 City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement 5.16.16 20. Extension. This Agreement is subject to extension at the sole discretion of the City. If the City decides to extend the Agreement, it will be handled through a bilateral change order or amendment to the Agreement. 21. Severability. Each provision of the Agreement is considered to be severable and, if, for any reason, any such provision or any part hereof is determined to be invalid and contrary to any existing or future applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of or affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, but this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part hereof had been omitted. 22. SUPPLIER AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS ("INDEMNITEES") FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF ANY NATURE ON ACCOUNT OF DEATH, PERSONAL INJURIES, PROPERTY LOSS OR DAMAGE OR ANY OTHER KIND OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES WHICH ARISE OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS CONTRACT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS CONTRACT, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE INJURIES, DEATH OR DAMAGES ARE CAUSED OR ARE CLAIMED TO BE CAUSED BY THE CONCURRENT OR CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES, BUT NOT IF BY THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES UNMIXED WITH THE FAULT OF ANY OTHER PERSON OR GROUP. SUPPLIER MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, INVESTIGATE ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO INDEMNITEES AND PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ANY KIND ARISING FROM ANY SAID LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF SUPPLIER UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL Page 5 of 7 City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement 5.16.16 SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. 23. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, either oral or written, between the parties. 24. Order of Precedence. In the event of conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement and its exhibits or attachments, such conflicts or inconsistencies will be resolved by reference to the documents in the following order of priority: a. this Agreement and its Attachments, b. the bid solicitation documents including Addenda, c. the Bid Response. Page 6 of 7 City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement 5.16.16 SUPPLIER Signature: Printed Name: Mark chlag Title: Vice -President Date: June 20, 2016 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Signature: Printed Name: Title: Date: Attachments: Attachment A: Scope of Work Attachment B: Pricing/Bid Schedule Incorporated by Reference: Exhibit 1: RFB No. 116 Exhibit 2: Bid Response City of Corpus Christi Page 7 of 7 Supply Agreement 5.16.16 ATTACHMENT A- SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI MATERIALS MANAGEMENT SPECIFICATION No. 1181 DATE: March 4, 2016 Rev Page 1 of 4 Liquid Cationic Polymer per Specification 1181 SCOPE: This specification covers poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride), hereinafter abbreviated "polyDADMAC" , for use in the treatment of potable (drinking) water. The polyDADMAC shall be an aqueous solution. Dry powder polyDADMAC will not be acceptable. CONFORMANCE: This Chemical must conform to: A. American National Standards Institute/American Water Works Association Standard for Poly(Diallyldimethylammonium Chloride) ANSI/AWWA B451-98. B. American National Standards Institute/National Sanitation Foundation Institute Standard for Drinking Water Treatment Chemical -Health Effects, ANSI/NSF 60. Conformance to ANSI/NSF 60 must be obtained by certification of this product by an agency recognized by the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. Certification must be either included with the bid or be received by the City within (2) days of notice. Safety Data Sheets (SDS) essentially similar to the U.S. Department of Labor fonn LSB-00 S-5 shall be furnished with the bid documents. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: A Certificate of Analysis must be furnished for each and every shipment. The Analysis is to contain the following information: a) PH: b) Viscosity: c) Specific Gravity: and d) % Active Polymer solids. WEIGHING REQUIREMENTS: Shipments shall be in approximately 25,000 wet ton gallons (50,000 pound) tank truck lots. Each shipment shall be weighed by local certified weighers before delivery and after unloading. The "weight ticket" or legible copies shall be promptly delivered by the truck driver to the City of Corpus Christi, Lead Operator on duty at the O.N. Stevens Plant, at 13101 Up River Road., Corpus Christi, Texas 78410. Shippers must be equipped with 3 inch Kam -Lok type female connection fittings to connect to the City's storage facilities. The City will not supply air, hoses or any connection fittings to the truck drivers. Deliveries shall be made to the City's storage facility within seven (7) days of order placement. Deliveries shall be made only between the hours of 7:00 A.M. CT and 6:00 P.M. CT Monday thru Friday. Weekend hours are from 9:00 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI MATERIALS MANAGEMENT SPECIFICATION No. 1181 DATE: March 4, 2016 Rev Page 2 of 4 A.M. CT to 4:00 P.M. CT on Saturday and Sunday. Deliveries outside these hours will not be accepted until the scheduled delivery hour of the following day. MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS: The estimated annual requirement for polyDADMAC is 435 tons. This quantity is based on treating 27,500,000,000 gallons of water at a dosage of 13 pounds per million gallons. OWNERSHIP: City's ownership of the polyDADMAC shall begin, and successful bidder's ownership shall cease, upon the unloading of the polyDADMAC into the City's storage facilities. OSHA AND TRAINING: Any material supplied must comply with all requirements and standards of the Occupational Safety and Health Act. All appropriate markings shall be in place before delivery. Items not meeting OSHA specifications will be refused. Successful Bidder, at its expense, shall provide training to City employees in the safe handling, storage and use of the material on a semiannual basis at the convenience of the City, to be arranged with the Plant Supervisor. This training shall include a DVD presentation of sufficient length to visually portray the proper procedures for handling storage and use of polyDADMAC. Also, all information continued on the SDS shall be thoroughly covered. REJECTION: The City shall have 30 days to notify the Supplier of the City's dissatisfaction with a shipment of polyDADMAC. The City reserves the right to reject a shipment when one or more of the specified parameters do not meet the specifications. The polyDADMAC shall meet the following requirements. Percent Active PolyDADMAC Solids: 30% to 50%. Viscosity Range: 1500 to 3500 cps (centipoise). Molecular -Weight Range: 150,000 to 300,000. Homogeneity of Molecular Weight: +/- 50,000. Repeating Monomeric Unit: Dimethyl. Specific Gravity: 1.06 to 1.09. pH Range: 5.0 to 8.0. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI MATERIALS MANAGEMENT SAMPLE TO BE SUBMITTED SPECIFICATION No. 1181 DATE: March 4, 2016 Rev Page 3 of 4 A one (1) liter sample of the material shall be furnished as part of the bid package for analysis by the City of Corpus Christi. The Material may be shipped directly to the Plant Supervisor III, O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant, 13101 Up River Road, Corpus Christi, TX 78410 (This is a physical address and is not for U. S. Mail usage). The U. S. Mail address is Plant Supervisor III, O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant, City of Corpus Christi, P. O. Box 9277, Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277. An Affidavit of Compliance, issued by the manufacturer, must be submitted with the sample. The Affidavit of Compliance is to state that the Poly (Diallyldimethyllammonium Chloride) furnished complies with all applicable requirements of ANSUAWWA B451-92. PAYMENT ADJUSTMENTS: 1. Payment for deliveries by the vendor shall be based on the percent of active polymer solids of PoIyDADMAC of each load as compared to the bid as shown in the following examples. EXAMPLE No. 1 Delivered Quantity = 25 Tons Bid Price = $100.00 per Ton Bid active polymer solids o PoIyDADMAC = 40% Actual delivered active polymer solids of polyDADMAC = 30% 25.000 Tons x $100.00 x 30%/40% = $1,875.00 EXAMPLE No. 2 Delivered Quantity = 25 Tons Bid Price = $100.00 per Ton Bid active polymer solids o PoIyDADMAC = 40% Actual delivered active polymer solids of polyDADMAC = 40% 25.000 Tons x $100.00 x 40%/40% = $2,500.00 EXAMPLE No. 3 Delivered Quantity = 25 Tons Bid Price = $100.00 per Ton Bid active polymer solids o PoIyDADMAC = 40% Actual delivered active polymer solids of polyDADMAC = 50% 25.000 Tons x $100.00 x 50%/40% = $3,125.00 2. When a conflict arises between the City of Corpus Christi Specifications and the ANSUAWWA Standard B451-92, the City of Corpus Christi requirement shall prevail. 3. The estimated quantity of 40% active polymer material needed is based on the amount required to treat approximately 27,500,000,000 gallons of water using a dosage of 3.8 mg/1. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI MATERIALS MANAGEMENT EXAMPLE No. 4 SPECIFICATION No. 1181 DATE: March 4, 2016 Rev Page 4 of 4 Dosage = 3.8 mg/1 Active polymer solids = 40% 27,500,000,000 gallons x 3.8 mg/1 x 8.341b/gal x L/1,000,000 mg = 870,000 lbs or rounded to the nearest 10 Tons = 435 Tons. NOTE: If a material containing less than 40% active polymer solids is provided, a greater quantity of material will be required. If a material containing more than 40% active polymer solids is provided, a lesser quantity of material will be required. ATTACHMENT 13- SCHEDULE OF PRICING CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION BID SHEET BID EVENT NO. 116 DATE: 3/24/16 Polydyne Inc. BIDDER AUTH PAGE 1 OF 1 D SIGNATURE Mark Schlag, Vice -President 1. Refer to "Instructions to Bidders" and Standard Purchase Terms and Conditions before completing bid. 2. Quote your best price, F.O.B. Destination, on each item. 3. In submitting this bid, Bidder certifies that: a. the prices in this bid have been arrived at independently, without consultation, communication, or agreement with any other Bidder or competitor, for the purpose of restricting competition with regard to prices; b. Bidder is an Equal Opportunity Employer; and c. the disclosure of Interest information on file with the City's purchasing office, pursuant to the Code of Ordinances, is current and true. ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE 2. Twelve-month Supply Agreement with option to extend for up to two (2) additional twelve-month periods, subject to the approval of the supplier and the City Manager, or designee. Li Liquid Cationic Polymer435 q y Clarifloc C-318 TNS TN(s) $794.00 $345,390.0C a9�� orms provided by Tex IgjctisfCerGjpilll►1tt Notary Public f corram,bsion Expires July 28, 201t www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.312 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 loft Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE CERTIFICATION ONLY OF FILING 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Polydyne Inc. Riceboro, GA United States Certificate Number: 2016-30792 Date Filed: 03/24/2016 Date Acknowledged: 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the goods or services to be provided under the contract. 29573 Polymer for water treatment and clarification 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. X 6 AFFIDAVIT AFFIX NOTARY Sworn to and 20 16 STAMP / SEAL ABOVE subscribed before me, by the said I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. ,- Signat e of authorized agent of contracting business entity Mark Schlag, Vice -President Mark Schlag , this the 24th day of March , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. amela J. McDermitt Notary Signature of officer a nistering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath a9�� orms provided by Tex IgjctisfCerGjpilll►1tt Notary Public f corram,bsion Expires July 28, 201t www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.312 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of July 19, 2016 DATE: TO: June 24, 2016 Margie C. Rose, Interim City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager MarkVV@cctexas.com (361) 826-3082 Valerie H. Gray, P.E., Executive Director, Public Works ValerieG@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: Dan Grimsbo, Interim Director of Water and Utilities DanG@cctexas.com (361) 826-1718 Jeffrey H. Edmonds, P.E., Director, Engineering Services JeffreyE@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Engineering Change Order No. 2 City -Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation Indefinite Delivery / Indefinite Quantity Program CAPTION: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute Change Order No. 2 with National Power Rodding Corporation of Chicago, Illinois in the amount of $596,194.57 for a total restated fee of $3,437,500.00 for the City -Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Program (Program). PURPOSE: The purpose of this agenda item is to obtain authority to execute a change order for the City - Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Program. CIP Description: City -Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Program The City -Wide Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) program is a long-term initiative designed to reduce the number and volume of sanitary sewer overflows within the City and is a key component of the life cycle program component to address collection system conveyance and sanitary sewer infrastructure requirements within the City. The program will identify, prioritize and implement specific capital improvement projects in a phased design and construction approach to extend the service life, improve flows, improve water quality, reduce overflows and cave-ins and reduce long-term maintenance costs. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: This Program will consist of wastewater collection system infrastructure repair /replacement in the six wastewater plant service basins. The scope of work includes, but is not limited to: rehabilitation and/or replacement of manholes, rehabilitation and/or replacement of gravity collection lines and/or force mains by pipe bursting, cured -in-place pipe, and/or open -cut method for lines up to 36 -inches in diameter, gravity line point repairs, dewatering through well pointing, control of wastewater flows through bypass pumping, cleaning and televised inspection of conduits, as needed Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans/permit compliance (subsidiary), and temporary traffic controls. On March 19, 2013, City Council awarded the original construction contract, in the amount of $5,500,000. The contract was approved for a two-year base term (24 -calendar months), with the option to extend administratively for up to three one-year periods (12 -calendar months). The City deemed the contractor responsive and the work of a quality sufficient to continue the contract. On May 23, 2014, the City administratively issued a Notice to Proceed for a one-year extension period (12 -calendar months), in the amount of $5,500,000. On September 29, 2015, the City administratively issued a Notice to Proceed for a one-year extension period (12 - calendar months) in the amount of $2,750,000. On May 13, 2016, Change Order No. 1 was administratively executed to repair unanticipated field conditions. Repair was made to the main deteriorated wastewater line resulting in settlement of the roadway. This change order was necessary to prevent further collapse. This Change Order No. 2 increases the contract change order threshold to the maximum 25% of the second renewed construction contract amount of $2,750,000. This Change order is required to address and accelerate the rehabilitation of several critical areas of the wastewater collection system. Critical line problems were discovered on existing pipelines that required immediate rehabilitation in addition to ongoing projects such as the TxDOT Ramp Reversal project that includes the relocation of all City utilities by July 2016. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the execution of the Change Order. 2. Do not authorize the execution of the Change Order. (Not Recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Conforms to City Fiscal Policy EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Utilities Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ®Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $21,042,200 $2,227,300 $23,269,500 Encumbered / Expended Amount $21,042,200 $21,042,200 This Item $596,195 $596,195 Future Anticipated Expenditures This Project $1,078,206 $1,078,206 BALANCE $0.00 $552,899 $552,899 Fund(s): Wastewater CIP #2 Comments: Change Order No.2 will result in the expenditure of an amount not to exceed $596,194.57. RECOMMENDATION: City Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 with National Power Rodding Corporation of Chicago, Illinois in the amount of $596,194.57 for a total restated fee of $3,437,500.00 for the City -Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Program (Program). LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Project Budget Location Map Presentation Change Order Form 1295 PROJECT BUDGET City -Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation Indefinite Delivery / Indefinite Quantity Program FUNDS AVAILABLE: Wastwater CIP $ 23,269,500 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction: *Construction FY 2013-2014 (National Power Rodding Corp) 5,500,000 Construction Renewal FY 2014-2015 (National Power Rodding Corp) 5,500,000 Construction Renewal FY 2015-2016 (National Power Rodding Corp) 3,437,500 Renewal $ 2,750,000 Change Order No. 1 91,305 Change Order No. 2 (THIS ITEM) 596,195 **Pipebursting Part A (PM Construction & Rehab, LLC) 3,750,000 ***Pipebursting Part B (PM Construction & Rehab, LLC) 1,875,000 Construction Observation & Testing: Construction Observation Estimate (TBD) 465,390 Construction Materials Testing Estimate (TBD) 200,000 Design: Design Engineer (LNV, Inc.) 671,745 *Original Contract 162,950 Amendment No. 1 49,000 Amendment No. 2 39,850 Amendment No.3 5,820 Amendment No.4 46,300 ****Amendment No.5 238,550 Amendment No.6 129,275 Design Engineer (Urban Engineering) 362,640 *Original Contract 120,880 ****Amendment No. 1 120,880 *****Amendment No. 2 120,880 *Design Engineer (Coym, Rehmet & Gutierrez Engineering, LP) 120,880 Geotechnical Study and Testing (Rock Engineering) 9,014 Reimbursements: Total Reimbursements. 824,433 Contract Administration (Engineering Svcs Admin/Capital Budget/Finance) 349,043 Engineering Services (Project Mgmt/Constr Mgmt) 465,390 Misc 10,000 TOTAL $ 22,716,602 PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE $ 552,899 *National Power Rodding, LNV, Urban and Coym Rehmet & Gutierrez original contracts approved by City Council on March 19, 2013 by Motion No. M2013-047 **PM Construction & Rehab contract approved by Council on January 12, 2016 by Motion No. M2016-001 ***PM Construction & Rehab contract approved by Council on April 19, 2016 by Motion No. M2016-042 PROJECT BUDGET City -Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation Indefinite Delivery / Indefinite Quantity Program FUNDS AVAILABLE: ****LNV Amendment No. 5 and Urban Amendment No. 2 were approved by City Council on March 31, 2015 by Motion No. M2015-030 *****Urban Amendment No. 2 was approved by Council on December 15, 2015 by Motion No. M2015-139 Allison Service Area San Patricio County Location 1 Oakhurst Dr.(SPID Ramp Reversal) 2 North Beach 3 Ennis Joslin/ McArdle Broadway Service Area I_'_I Corpus Christi Bay Greenwood SerJice Area Oso Service Area 0 Laguna Madre Service Area Whitecap Madre S rvice Area VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Project Number: E15175 City -Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Program CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Carpus Chr sti Engineering City -Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation - Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Program Council Presentation July 12, 2016 Project Location Corpus Chr'sti Engineering San Patnmo County Location 1 Oakhurst Dr.(SPID Ramp Reversal) 2 North Beach 3 Ennis Joslinl McArdle cJ_\ \J( '❑2 J� c Coax. Chid SaS 2 Change Order Summary Corpus Chr sti Engineering TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT (9/29/15) 25% Limit Amount Change Order No. 1 Change Order No. 2 (for the following items) Utility Relocations associated with TxDOT Ramp Reversal (Estimate) Additional D.O. Site located at North Beach (Estimate) Additional D.O. Site located at EnnisJoshlin (Estimate) Current contract overrun TOTAL All Change Orders NEW CONTRACT AMOUNT $150,000.00 $100,000.00 $271,194.57 $75,000.00 $2,750,000.00 $687,500.00 $91,305.43 $596,194.57 $687,500.00 $3,437,500.00 Administrative Renewal Administrative Approval THIS ITEM Equal to 25% Limit Amount City of Corpus Christi Engineering Services Change Order CHANGE ORDER NO.: PROJECT: City -Wide Collection System Replacement & Rehab ID IQ Pncurement CONTRACTOR: National Power Rodding Corp. ENGINEER: LNV CHANGE ORDER DATE: 5 26+21316 PROJECT NUMBER: E 15175 CONTRACT TIME: 365 CD (Make the following additions, mndilleatlons or deletions to the work described In the Contract Documents 1 Wasrewmer Funds required for current contract overrun I LS €1575,000.00 575.000.00 2 ilrastewaier Funds needed for Utility Re1ocattons associated w'tri TxDot Ramp Reversal 1 L5 ® S150,000.00 3150,000.00 3 Wasretvawer Additional DO Site located at North Beach 1 LS 13 5100,000.00 5100,000.00 4 Was:rimier Additional DO Site located at Ennis loslim 1 LS ® 5271,19437 3271,194.57 Net Total of This Change Order 5 596,194.57 Why was this Change necessary: This Change Onto Inverses the mann ahrethnld to the muimum 25•• allowed b oddness and accelerate the rehalrilitadon atseveral critical was oldie war:meta collection *stein. This 1DIQ conuructlon contract war for multiple years and reached the fatal option year end funding level. Critical line problems was discovered an existing pipelines that require immediate rehabilitation in rodlike s ongoing project including the TxDOT Ramp Reversal project that all City within must be relocated by tiny 2016. Haw can similar changes be avoided in the future? Baur coordinate a rcplecomenl IDIQ to allow continual work with additional coasidenrion to Increase the initial funding and award threshold for additional work The compensation agreed upon in this Change Order isfull, complete and final paymaufir all costs the Contractor may incur as a result of or relating to this change whether said costs are known, unknown, foreseen or unforeseen at this time, including without llaiinNen, any cost for delay, extended overhead, ripple or Impact cost, or any athayffect on changed or unchanged work as a result of this Change Order. Original Contract Amount 5 2,750,000.00 Previously Approved Change Order Amount 5 91,305.43 Proposed Change Order Amount S 596,19437 Revised Contract Amount 5 3,437,500.00 Percent of Total Change Orders (including this CO) 25.00% Previous Change Orda Contract Time 0 CD Additional Time on This Change Order 0 CD Revisal Control Time 0 CD Recommended by Approved by ICONSULTIN FIRM' 'CONTRACTOR' By Recommended W' Recommended by: Recommended by: Recommended by: DEPARTMENT APPROVALS: Date .7/4/' CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Philip L. ',#' It, P.E. Date Acting Construction Engineer Jeffrey Edmonds, P.E. Dare 6/e Approved by: 6.6.16 Wijliam T. Kreidier, President Date Valerie H. Gray, P.E. Date Director of Engineering Serviea Executive Director of Public Works Approved by: Eddie Houlihan Dale Mark Von Vieek Date Budget and Finance Janet Kellogg City Anomey Date Approved by: Operating Department (Wastewater) Assistant City Manager Margie C. Rose Dike Acting City Manager CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-78044 Date Filed: 06/29/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. National Power Rodding Corp. Chicago, IL United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI g Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E15175 City Wide Collection System Replacement & Rehab ID/IQ Procurement 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary Carylon Corporation Chicago, IL United States X Ruprecht, Reid Chicago, IL United States X Castel, Fabian Chicago, IL United States X Kreidler, William Chicago, IL United States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. ❑ 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the al, , - "OFFICIAL SE DESTINY CAMARGO RESENDEZ`A -- and correct. .isclosure is de NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF ILLINOIS Signatur:'(authorized agent of contracting bIrsiness entity M Commission h iros 08/3012019 W. iam T. Kreidler, President AFFIX NSTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said William T. Kreidler , this the 29th day of June , 20 16 , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. Resendez Notary Public Destiny Camargo Signature of 6 - cer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of July 19, 2016 DATE: July 12, 2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, Interim City Manager FROM: Andy Leal Jr., Assistant Director Street Maintenance AndyL(c�cctexas.com (361) 857-1957 Maria Pedraza, Procurement Manager Mariape(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-3176 Purchase of 30 Cabinet Assemblies with Cobalt Controllers and 5 individual Cobalt Controllers CAPTION: Motion approving the purchase of 30 Cabinet Assemblies with Cobalt Controllers and 5 individual Cobalt Controllers from Paradigm Traffic Systems, Houston, Texas based on a cooperative purchasing agreement with Texas Local Government Purchasing Cooperative, dba BuyBoard, for the amount of $338,200.00. The Street Department has set aside funds in FY 2015-16 for this procurement. PURPOSE: This equipment will be used to replace outdated traffic signal equipment. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: There are 247 signalized traffic intersections which are maintained by the Traffic Signal Division. Each intersection is equipped with a traffic controller cabinet, traffic controller, and various other control components. The existing NEMA TS -1 Traffic Cabinets are older, obsolete, and not compatible with the latest technology of traffic controllers and have limited functionality. The existing older Econolite ASC 2&3 traffic controllers have communication compatibility issues with the Centracs Advance Transportation System software. Replacement of this outdated equipment will improve traffic management operations and is part of the plan in developing the Traffic Management Center. ALTERNATIVES: None. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This purchase conforms to the City's purchasing policies and procedures and State statutes regulating procurement. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Street Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: x Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015- 2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $564,211.80 $0 $564,211.80 Encumbered / Expended Amount $207,697.04 $0 $207,697.04 This item $338,200.00 $0 $338,200.00 BALANCE $18,314.76 $0 $18,314.76 Fund(s): Street Fund Comments: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Price Sheet CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION BUYER: DOMINGO VALDEZ PRICE SHEET PURCHASE OF 30 COBALT CABINETS WITH CONTROLLERS AND 5 CONTROLLERS TEXAS GOVERNMENT PURCHASING COOPERATIVE BuyBoard Contract No. 432-13 ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT Paradigm Traffic Systems Houston, TX UNIT PRICE EXTENDED PRICE 1 W red P-44 Cabinet Assembly with Cobalt Controller Part #PTSI 30 ea $12,700.00 $381,000.00 P44COB, Manufacturer: Paradigm Traffic Systems 2. Discount- Repeat Customer 30 ea 51,860.00 $55,800.00 3. Cobalt 2100 ATC Signal Controller Part # COB21100110009 5 ea $3,100.00 $15,500.00 4. Discount- Repeat Customer 5 ea 5500.00 52,500.00 TOTAL $338,200.00 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of July 19, 2016 DATE: TO: June 27, 2016 Margie C. Rose, Interim City Manager FROM: Valerie H. Gray, P.E., Executive Director of Public Works valerieg@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 Andres Leal, Jr., P. E., Interim Director of Street Operations andyl@cctexas.com (361) 826-1957 Resolution Regional Transit Authority (RTA) 2016 Funding for Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) CAPTION: Resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute the "Notification for Additional Funding in 2016 (Street Maintenance Program)" in an amount of $2,814,839.00 for the Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority's fiscal year 2016 allocation to the City's Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) projects. PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to receive authorization to execute the "Notification for Additional Funding in 2016 (Street Maintenance Program)" from the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA). BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The City and RTA entered into a revised Interlocal Agreement in 2013 (attached). The RTA allocates a percentage of its sales tax receipts for funding the Street Preventative Maintenance Program based upon an allocation formula developed by the RTA. Actual funding for each fiscal year is based on the amount budgeted for the adopted fiscal year. The RTA has contributed the following amounts over the previous three years to the City for street preventative maintenance: 2013 (new Interlocal Agreement) $2,281,891 2014 Contribution Letter 2,547,728 2015 Contribution Letter 2,658,487 RTA has provided the City with the "Notification for Additional Funding in 2016 (Street Maintenance Program)" notifying of their contribution amount of $2,814,839 for the City's Fiscal Year 2017. (Funds from RTA's 2015 Fiscal Year Contribution were received during the City's 2016 Fiscal Year.) ALTERNATIVES: Not applicable. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Resolution complies with City's financial policies. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal, Financial Services, Street Operations FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑Operating X Revenue ❑Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Years 2015 - 2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered/Expended Amount This item $2,814,839.00 $2,814,839.00 BALANCE 0 $2,814,839.00 $2,814,839.00 Fund(s): Street Maintenance Fund Comments: This is funding from RTA for the City's Fiscal Year 2017. RECOMMENDATION: City Council authorization to execute the "Notification for Additional Funding 2016 (Street Maintenance Program)". LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution with Notification for Additional Funding 2016 (Street Maintenance Program) 2013 Interlocal Agreement between City and RTA Resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute the "Notification for Additional Funding in 2016 (Street Maintenance Program)" in an amount of $2,814,839.00 for the Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority's fiscal year 2016 allocation to the City's Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) projects. Whereas, the Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority ("RTA") and the City of Corpus Christi ("City") entered into a revised Interlocal Agreement ("the Agreement"), approved by City Council on May 28, 2013; Whereas, the intent of the 2013 revision was to provide for RTA to increase its funding for street improvement projects; Whereas, as revised, the Agreement provides for RTA to allocate a percentage of its sales tax receipts based upon an allocation formula developed by the RTA; Whereas, the Agreement further provides that RTA's actual funding for each fiscal year is to be based on the budgeted amount for the Street Improvement Program adopted for the fiscal year; Whereas, Section 2 of the Agreement provides as follows: 2. The RTA is allocating a percentage of its sales tax receipts for funding the new Program, said amount to be allocated among all participating governmental units based upon an allocation formula developed by the RTA. The RTA's actual funding for the Program for each fiscal year shall be based on the amount budgeted for the Street Improvement Program adopted for the fiscal year. The projected funding for fiscal year 2013 under this Agreement is $2,281,891.00. Whereas, the RTA has contributed the following amounts over the previous three years to the City for street preventative maintenance: FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 2,281,891.00 2,547,728.00 2,658,487.00 Whereas, RTA has provided the City with the attached "Notification for Additional Funding in 2016 (Street Maintenance Program)" to be executed for the sole purpose of acknowledging this additional funding in the amount of $2,814,839.00 for its fiscal year 2016. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute the "Notification for Additional Funding in 2016 (Street Maintenance Program)", attached as Exhibit A, in the amount of $2,814,839.00 for the Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority's fiscal year 2016 allocation to the City's Street Preventative Maintenance Program and any other documents necessary to accept additional funding. ATTEST CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas of , 2016 The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Rudy Garza Todd Hunter Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Brian Rosas Lucy Rubio Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughn EXHIBIT A NOTIFICATION FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING IN 2016 (Street Maintenance Program) The Regional Transportation Authority in Corpus Christi, Texas ("RTA"), a metropolitan transit authority operating under Chapter 451 of the Texas Transportation Code, and the City of Corpus Christi, Texas ("City"), a municipal corporation, entered into a revised Interlocal Agreement (the "Agreement'*) in 2013 providing funding by the RTA to the City for a Street Maintenance Program. The RTA has allocated the amount of $2,814,839.00 for its fiscal year 2016 under the Agreement. Such funds shall be paid to the City for projects in the manner provided under the Agreement. As provided in the Agreement, the City has agreed to submit its proposed list of street improvement projects for fiscal year 2016 funding and file a report with the RTA within 90 days following the end of each year on the expenditure of the funds paid to the City during the previous fiscal year. The RTA additionally has adopted a policy to encourage contracting with disadvantaged business enterprises (DBEs) in all procurements and has adopted a goal of 13% participation for the current year. The City is encouraged to provide contracting opportunities for DBEs in connection with the use of these funds and include the level of DBE participation in the final report. This Amendment is made for the sole purpose of acknowledging the additional funding for 2016. All terms and conditions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and are ratified and confirmed. EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE ORIGINALS this /2---‘3, of May, 2016. C.CEPTED: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 13y: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager Date: , 2016. F 1278B RTA16 IntLocal116 TransFund-Nottcc-CC docx REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY By: Jorg -Aedo, CEO RTA INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT (Street Maintenance Program) This Interlocal Agreement is made between Regional Transportation Authority in Corpus Christi, Texas ("RTA"), a metropolitan transit authority operating under Chapter 451 of the Texas Transportation Code, and the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, ("City"), a municipal corporation. WHEREAS, the RTA has provided a Street improvement Program (the "Street Improvement Program" or the "Program") since the RTA's creation in 1985, to provide financial assistance for street projects to local govenunental entities; and WHEREAS, the RTA desires to increase funding based upon sales tax revenues and provide for a more efficient process in funding street projects; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AGREED BY THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: 1. Proposals Under Program. No later than February 1 of each year during the term of this Agreement, the City shall submit a request specifying the street maintenance projects (the "Projects") which are eligible for consideration for funding under the Program. RTA shall review the proposals submitted by alt governmental entities in the RTA's service area and develop a list of priorities of the Projects based on the transportation needs of the RTA and the transportation needs of the City. The RTA staff and the staff of the City shall work diligently to develop a final list of Projects to be funded under this Program. To the extent feasible, the City shall coordinate with overlapping jurisdictions any Projects which will maximize the impact of RTA's Program. 2. Funding. The RTA is allocating a percentage of its sales tax receipts for funding the new Program, said amount to be allocated among all participating governmental units based upon an allocation formula developed by the RTA. The RTA's actual funding for the Program for each fiscal year shall be based on the amount budgeted for the Street Improvement Program adopted for the fiscal year. The projected funding for fiscal year 2013 under this Agreement is $2,281,891.00. 3. Eligible Street Projects. The Projects eligible for funding shall include any street projects permitted under Chapter 451 of the Texas Transportation Code. The City may seek for inclusion as an eligible Project, Projects which would be wholly -funded by the RTA and Projects which may be partially -funded by RTA. The parties agree that the City intends to use the funds for overlays and sealcoat projects which would alter the construction of roadways utilized by the RTA as authorized under Chapter 451. Any Projects involving the construction of bus pads or ADA accessibility improvements shall be funded separately either by the RTA or the City acting independently or based on their mutual agreement. 4. Completion of Projects. Upon approval of the Projects by the RTA, the RTA shall provide funding by remitting payment directly to City as and when the expenses are incurred, subject to the maximum funding authorized under this Agreement. The City agrees to diligently proceed with the completion of the approved Projects upon the receipt of funding. Upon the 2013-180 5/28/13 Res. 029847 INDEXED completion of the Projects, the City shall invoice the RTA for the amounts payable under this Agreement showing the actual expenditures made by the City in connection with the Projects and the amount payable by the RTA. The RTA shall make payment within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the invoice subject to the requirements of this Agreement. 5. Signage. All Projects funded by the RTA will be identified as an RTA -funded Project through construction signs or other signage located at the site of the Project. Such signs shall be provided by the RTA and maintained by the City on the construction sites throughout the project, but at least a minimum of seven (7) days in the event the project takes less than seven (7) days to complete. 6. Reporting. Within ninety (90) days following the end of each year of this Agreement, the City shall report to the RTA on any Projects that have not been completed by the time the report is made and indicate the status of the Projects and the estimated time of completion. The report shall be supplemented by the City upon completion of the Project by the submission of the invoice showing the actual amount of expenditures made and amount payable by the RTA. 7. Term and Renewal. This Agreement shall be for an initial term of one year. This agreement is subject to automatic renewal unless terminated as provided herein. Notice of termination shall be given upon 90 days advance written notice. Any such notice of termination shall be given to each of the parties to this Agreement in accordance with the notice provisions provided below. 8. Additional Projects. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent the RTA and the City from entering into other agreements for the completion of street projects or other transportation -related projects of mutual interest outside the terms of this Agreement or entering into multi-year programs for major projects. 9. Payments. Any payment made by the RTA for any of the services provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be made out of current revenues available to the RTA as required by the Inter- local Cooperation Act. All funding obligations of the RTA and the City under this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of funds by each entity in its annual budget. 10. Federal Provisions. The City agrees to include such provisions in its construction documents as reasonably required by the RTA in order to meet the requirements of the federal government for providing federal transit assistance. The City agrees to comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act in its determination of projects funded under this Agreement. The RTA shall review all projects to ensure compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. 11. Severability Clause. If any portion of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance. shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any . court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and shall continue to be enforceable in accordance with its terms. 12. Notices. Notices under this Agreement shall be addressed to the parties as indicated below, or changed by written notice to such effect, and shall be effected when delivered or when deposited in the U.S. Mail, post pre -paid, certified mail, return receipt requested. -2 RTA: CEO Regional Transportation Authority 5658 Bear Lane Corpus Christi, Texas 78405 CITY: City of Corpus Christi P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 Attn: City Manager 13. Performance. This Agreement shall be performed in Nueces County, Texas, and shall be interpreted according to the laws of the State of Texas. 14. Enikulgraingt This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the parties and may not be modified by any oral amts or understandings. Any amendments must be made in writing and signed by all parties. 15. hisignnigni. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the parties to this Agreement and their respective successors and permitted assigns. This Agreement may not be assigned by any party without the written consent of all of the other parties. 16. intotiosdraminatuAl. This Agreement is subject to the terms and provisions of the Texas Inter -local Cooperation Act, codified as Chapter 791 of the Texas Local Government Code. Further, each party represents that this agreement has been duly passed and approved by its governing body, as required by the Act, 17. Repliumment Qf 2001 Agreerpen. This Interlacal Agreement for street improvement funds between the RTA and the City shall replace the 2001 Interlocal Agreement for street improvement fiords between the RTA and the City in its entirety. The funding in this Interlocal Agreement includes the funding provided in that original Agreement between the City and the RTA dated as of November 26,1985. Executed thisC t day of Z &r,e , 2013. CORPUS CHRISTI REGIONAL CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY By: Scott Neeley, CEO J Ronald L. O1on, tity Manager By: :711' --� eillitiCIL vq2-(4V) • ° SECIVAINT c+noamne4 end setdnpslryannrc%Lotar Seninannmpnuy moon FikdOontent.oudooi<l7(CNPApauf113 Th iFund AgnuCt - ev (4).dxx - 3 - ArrEst AR Q IPA CITY SEa ETAr ' AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of July 19, 2016 DATE: June 21, 2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, Interim City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager markvv@cctexas.com (361) 826-3897 Valerie H. Gray, P. E., Executive Director of Public Works valerieg@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: J. H. Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 CAPTION: Engineering Construction Contract Greenwood Drive from Gollihar Road to Horne Road BOND 2012 Proposition 1 Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with HAAS -Anderson Construction, LTD of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $3,789,579.60 for Greenwood Drive from Gollihar Road to Horne Road for the total base bid. (BOND 2012 Proposition 1) PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is to obtain authority to execute a construction contract for Greenwood Drive from Gollihar Road to Horne Road Project. (BOND 2012 Proposition 1) BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: This project was approved in the Bond 2012 Proposition 1 Street Projects by the community in the general election held on November 6, 2012. Bond 2012 Brochure description: "Greenwood Drive from Gollihar Road to Horne Road — This project includes full depth repair and widening of the existing five lane roadway (four travel lanes and continuous center left turn lane). The existing travel lanes will be widened and reconstructed to meet the requirements of the UTMP A-1 Arterial designation. Other street improvements include curb and gutter, wide sidewalks, ADA curb ramps, lane striping and pavement markings, and bus stop rehabilitation." The Project includes the full depth reconstruction of existing 4 -lane with continuous center turn—lane with new curb and gutter, sidewalks, bus stop, pavement markings and striping. The project also includes upgrades to City utilities for water, wastewater, storm water and gas. The new pavement will be Hot -Mix -Asphalt -Concrete (H MAC) to match the existing Greenwood Drive pavements. The bike route associated for this corridor from Gollihar to Horne was included under a separate project for the Hector P. Garcia Park as a joint MPO/City project and cost sharing under the Transportation Alternative Program. This project is under design with construction planned for early 2017. On June 15, 2016, the City received proposals from four (4) bidders and the bids are as follows: Contractor Base Bid HAAS -Anderson Construction, LTD Corpus Christi, Texas $3,789,579.60 JE Construction Services Corpus Christi, Texas $3,960,119.26 Bay, LTD. Corpus Christi, Texas $4,194,409.15 Clark Pipeline Services, LLC Corpus Christi, Texas $4,298,809.34 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize execution of a construction contract. (Recommended) 2. Do not authorize execution of a construction contract. (Not Recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Govind Development, LLC is the design engineer that was selected for this project under RFQ 2012-03. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Complies with statutory requirements for construction contracts. Conforms to FY 2015-2016 Street Capital Improvement Planning (CIP) Budget. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Street Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue X Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Project to Date Budget and Expenditures Current Year Future Years TOTALS Budget $3,866,528.15 $1,220,400.00 $5,086,928.15 Encumbered / Expended Amount 653,773.03 0.00 653,773.03 This item 0.00 $3,789,579.60 $3,789,579.60 Future Anticipated Expenditures This 0.00 626,833.97 626,833.97 Project BALANCE $3,212,755.12 ($3,196,013.57) $16,741.55 Fund(s): ST 30 Comments: N/A RECOMMENDATION: City staff and Govind Development recommend the construction contract be awarded to HAAS -Anderson Construction, LTD in the amount of $3,789,579.60 for the Greenwood Drive from Gollihar Road to Horne Road BOND 2012 project. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Project Budget Location Map Presentation Form 1295 PROJECT BUDGET Greenwood Drive from Gollihar Road to Horne Road Bond 2012 PROJECT FUNDS AVAILABLE: Bond 2012 $ 2,850,000.00 Utilities 2,236,928.15 Water 833,333.29 Wastewater 304,549.24 Storm Water 1,022,045.62 Gas 77,000.00 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $ 5,086,928.15 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction: Construction (HAAS -Anderson) THIS ITEM 3,789,579.60 Street 2,145,686.09 Utilities 1,643,893.51 Water 768,910.64 Storm Water 702,597.87 Wastewater 158,170.00 Gas 14,215.00 Contingency (10%) 378,957.00 Construction Inspection and Testing: Construction Inspection (Estimate) 165,792.00 Construction Phase - Materials Testing Services (Rock) 44,615.00 Design: Engineer (Govind) Original Contact and Three Amendments 517,443.00 Street 221,400.00 Utilities 296,043.00 Water 45,402.00 Storm Water 196,764.00 Wastewater 53,877.00 Design Phase - Geotechnical Study and Testing (Rock Engineering) 17,800.00 Reimbursements: Total Reimbursements 156,000.00 Contract Administration (Engineering Svcs Admin/Finance/Capital Budget) 66,000.00 Engineering Services (Project Mgt/Constr Mgt) 88,000.00 Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 2,000.00 TOTAL $ 5,070,186.60 ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE $ 16,741.55 MreSt Navigation BIid Texas Stale AaraTIU 6 RA.Tr 7 (i! -.H1) 0 1 n7..-11-, ran Project Location er _Corpu _ Christi to te.. L..._ .. cr. Mangan AYE sl .tt i...? i kci ek t .°5. 4. c):1 Li.:1 40.4. lIzr '1.21'4' AN. ......? W Point Rd VICINITYMAP NOT TO SCALE 44-,90 Project Number E12092 Greenwood Drive from Gollihar Drive to Horne Road Street Bond 2012 CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Corpus Chr sti Engineering Greenwood Drive (Gollihar Road to Horne Road) Bond 2012, Proposition 1 Council Presentation July 12, 2016 Project Vicinity �hrsti Engineering L�- rioradna as F t Project Location erg • ' p as hdrR of resas Slale Pquon,i.r ..S Corpus Christi E7 Ap La Pa" a 2 Project Location �hrsti Engineering 3 Project Location Corpus Christi Engineering 0 C C 'S--": (1) 4 Cross Sections 0 �hrsti Engineering HOT MIX ASPHALT CONCRETE (HMAC) 2" HMAC (TYPED) 5.5" HMAC (TYPE B) 10" CRUSHED LIMESTONE (TYPE A) 6" BASE COURSE 8" SUBGRADE (LIME TREATED) PRIME COAT (MC -30) GEOGRID (TX -5) SIDEWALK TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE CONTINUOUS TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE SIDEWALK LEFT•TURN LANE f Project Scope �hrsti Engineering This project includes the full depth reconstruction of Greenwood Drive including: • New HMAC pavement, curb and gutters, sidewalks, ADA compliant ramps, and RTA concrete bus pads • Underground utility improvements include water, wastewater and storm water and gas • New signage and pavement markings ❖ Future bicycle traffic is planned under a separate joint City/MPO project for Hike & Bike Trail through HP Garcia Park from Horne to Gollihar, to be completed during street construction Project Schedule �hrsti Engineering 2013-2016 2016 2017 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Bid Construction IIIM Construction Estimate: 11 Months CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-77335 Date Filed: 06/28/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Haas-Anderson Construction, Ltd. Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E12092 Road Contruction and Associated Utilities 4 Name of Interested Party City,State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary Moore, Randall Corpus Christi, TX United States X Cullen, Drew Corpus Christi, TX United States X Lamon, Tim Corpus Christi, TX United States X Parish, Jim Corpus Christi, TX United States X Anderson, Jim Corpus Christi, TX United States X Haas, Darryl Corpus Christi, TX United States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. ❑ 6 AFFIDAVIT AFFIX Sworn 20 I swear, or affirm, unde • - alty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. $1....^ra LEE ANN CAVETI' SMITH' le ; ire NOTARY PUBLIC ////� gyp' jjy f % / / `f/ - ,'xdi.S., 12-18-2017 „ � .F.� „„, , ,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, Signature of authorized agent of contracting NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE to and subscribed before me, by the said II\ G-. ,-1 A c-- I QC, r e, , this the 2W +k business entity day of 0, vi e_ , 1 i - , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. n n ��, �� ) o'er eL 7r\-. LeeI�t Signature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administeroath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of July 19, 2016 DATE: TO: July 5, 2016 Margie C. Rose, Interim City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, P.E., Assistant City Manager MarkVV@cctexas.com (361) 826-3082 Valerie H. Gray, P.E., Executive Director, Public Works ValerieG@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: J. H. Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Stacie Talbert-Anaya, Interim Director Parks & Recreation StacieT@cctexas.com (361) 826-3476 Execute Engineering Design Contracts North Beach Area - Road Improvements and Area Beautification North Beach Area — Pedestrian Improvements and Area Enhancements Bond 2012 — Proposition 8 CAPTION: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute Engineering Design Contracts with LJA Engineering, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $130,524.70 for the North Beach Area - Road Improvements and Area Beautification project and $121,358.39 for the North Beach Area — Pedestrian Improvements and Area Enhancements for engineering design services. (Bond 2012, Proposition 8). PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is to execute Engineering Design Contracts with LJA Engineering, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas for two projects: North Beach Area - Road Improvements and Area Beautification project and the North Beach Area — Pedestrian Improvements and Area Enhancements. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Both projects are part of Bond 2012 Proposition 8 — Economic Development Projects. The projects will be designed and constructed under one package to maximize the funding and scope. Bond 2012 Brochure Lanquage: "North Beach Area - Road Improvements and Area Beautification - This project includes landscaping enhancements, roadway surface and pedestrian improvements for Surfside Boulevard, Breakwater Avenue, Pearl Avenue, N. Shoreline Boulevard, Bridgeport Avenue, Coastal Avenue and the medians along the Highway 181 entrances to North Beach." "North Beach Area — Pedestrian Improvements and Area Enhancements - This project includes repairs and improvements to the Breakwater sidewalk, on -street parking enhancements, pedestrian improvements and Breakpoint Plaza enhancements." Project Design Scope: North Beach Area — Roadway Improvements and Area Beautification —The contract will include the installation of new curb ramps along the east side of Surfside Boulevard between Burleson Street and Coastal Avenue, street reclamation on Breakwater Avenue, Bridgeport Avenue, and Coastal Avenue between North Shoreline and Surfside Boulevard and on North Shoreline Boulevard between Pearl Avenue and Coastal Avenue. North Beach Area — Pedestrian Improvements and Area Enhancements -The project will include pedestrian and parking improvements along North Shoreline Boulevard between Pearl Street and Bridgeport Avenue, including curb and gutter modifications, new sidewalks, curb ramps and new pavement markings. This project also includes repaving the Breakwater Plaza and repairs to the concrete cap along the breakwater structure. Previous Work: This agreement authorizes the design based on preliminary design results and coordinates with Parks and Recreation and adjacent landowners, the U.S.S. Lexington and the Texas State Aquarium. Final design will achieve Bond 2012 objectives and may require additional funds. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Execute the Engineering Design Contracts with LJA Engineering, Inc. as proposed. (Recommended). 2. Do not execute the Engineering Design Contracts with LJA Engineering, Inc. as proposed. (Not Recommended). OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: LJA Engineering, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas was selected for this project as a result of RFQ No. 2012-03 Bond Issue 2012 and CIP Projects, dated August 31, 2012. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The Contract for Professional Services and selection process comply with the Professional Procurement Act and City Policy. LJA Engineering, Inc. was selected based upon qualifications, wide working knowledge of applicable project fundamentals, and understanding of project requirements. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Streets Parks and Recreation FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue X Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $48,960.00 $259,383.09 $2,543,302.58 $2,851,645.67 Encumbered/Expended Amount 48,960.00 48,960.00 This item (E12127) $130,524.70 $130,524.70 This item (E12129) $121,358.39 $121,358.39 Future Anticipated Expenditures This Project 7,500.00 100,000.00 107,500.00 BALANCE $0.00 $0.00 $2,443,302.58 $ 2,443,302.58 Fund(s) Streets Bond 2012, Utilities CIP RECOMMENDATION: City Staff recommends the approval of the Engineering Design Contracts with LJA Engineering, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas for the North Beach Area - Road Improvements and Area Beautification project and the North Beach Area — Pedestrian Improvements and Area Enhancements. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Project Budget Location Map Presentation AE Contracts Form 1295 - 2 PROJECT BUDGET North Beach Area Road Improvements & Area Beautification - E12127 North Beach Pedestrian Improvements and Area Enhancements - E12129 BOND 2012 - Proposition 8 FUNDS AVAILABLE: Bond 2012 Streets $ 1,600,000.00 Utilities CIP 1,251,645.67 Storm Water CIP 868,099.60 Wastewater 175,160.00 Water 208,386.07 TOTAL $ 2,851,645.67 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction: Construction Estimate TBD Construction Contingency (10%) TBD Construction Inspection & Testing: Construction Inspection - (Estimate) TBD Construction Phase - Materials Testing Services TBD Design: A/E Consultant (LJA, Inc.) 300,843.09 Preliminary Design 48,960.00 Enginering Design (THIS ITEM) E12127 130,524.70 Enginering Design (THIS ITEM) E12129 121,358.39 Design Phase - Geotechnical & Materials Testing (Estimate) 7,500.00 Reimbursements: Total Reimbursements 100,000.00 Contract Administration (Engineering Svcs Admin/Capital Budget/Finance) 42,000.00 Engineering Services (Project Mgt/Constr Mgt) 57,000.00 Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 1,000.00 TOTAL $ 408,343.09 ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE $ 2,443,302.58 MIatket G 613,41/ 1.12Y? Ji?'P Project Location W "+'hatl bu rger Field Port AVE M American 6.anik Center Y,q - z t+ VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Corpus Christi Bay Project Number: E12127 & E12129 North Beach Area Road Improvements and Area Beautification Bond 2012 Prop 8 CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES INO Corpus Chr'sti Engineering North Beach Area — Bond 2012 — Prop. 8 Road Improvements and Area Beautification & Pedestrian Improvements and Area Enhancements Council Presentation July 12, 2016 Vicinity Map Corpus Chr sti Engineering N,avigetion blvd ,a' 1 6,. A. ea,F,drer yro ApP Project Location �POrr Ave 4`lharab�y<<e�I American Bank Censer -0 pan St 2 Location Map (*Corpus Engineering Timon Blvd. m m m o rexa. State tgaar am E12129 N. Shoreline Blvd. El 2127 ts, Lexiinatn, 3 Project Scope Corpus chr sti Engineering This project includes two Bond 2012, Proposition 8 projects for these two that will be combined into one construction package with the following elements: "North Beach Area - Roadway Improvements and Area Beautification" (E12127) • New curb ramps along the east side of Surfside Boulevard between Burleson Street and Coastal Avenue • Street rehabilitation on: ✓ Breakwater Avenue - North Shoreline to Surfside Boulevard ✓ Bridgeport Avenue - North Shoreline to Surfside Boulevard ✓ Coastal Avenue - North Shoreline to Surfside Boulevard ✓ North Boulevard - Peal Avenue to Coastal Avenue "North Beach Area - Pedestrian Improvements and Area Enhancements" (E12129) • Pedestrian and parking improvements along North Shoreline Boulevard between Pearl Street and Bridgeport Avenue • Curb and gutter modifications with new sidewalks, curb ramps and pavement markings • Repaving the Breakwater Plaza • Repairs to the concrete cap along the breakwater structure 4 Project Schedule Oorpus Engineering 2016 2017 Jul JulIAug Sepl Oct I Nov Decl Jan Feb Marl Apr May Jun IAug Sepl Oct Nov Decl Jan M_ Design M Bid/Award Construction Projected Schedule reflects City Council design award of North Beach Area Improvements in July 2016 with estimated construction completion in January 2018. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home rule municipal corporation, P.O. Box 9277, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas 78469-9277 (City) acting through its duly authorized City Manager or Designee (Director of Engineering Services) and LJA Engineering, Inc., a Texas corporation, 820 Buffalo Street, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas 78401 (local office), (Consultant), hereby agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF PROJECT North Beach Area Improvements and Area Beautification (Bond 2012) - Project No. E12127 The North Beach Area Improvements and Area Beautification (Bond 2012) Project includes Design and Bid Phase services and associated Additional Services, as described herein, for the installation of new curb ramps along the east side of Surfside Blvd. between Burleson St. and Coastal Ave., street reclamation on Breakwater Ave., Bridgeport Ave., and Coastal Ave. between N. Shoreline Blvd. and Surfside Blvd. and on N. Shoreline Blvd. between Pearl Ave. and Coastal Ave., new pavement markings and incidental utility improvements within the project area. This contract is based upon proposed improvements with a total estimated construction cost of $1,100,000. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES The Consultant hereby agrees to perform services to complete the Project, as detailed in Exhibit "A". In addition, Consultant will provide monthly status updates (project progress or delays presented with monthly invoices) and provide contract administration services, as described in Exhibit "A", to complete the Project. Work will not begin on Additional Services until requested by the Consultant (provide breakdown of costs, schedules), and written authorization is provided by the Director of Engineering Services. 3. ORDER OF SERVICES The Consultant agrees to begin work on those authorized Basic Services for this contract upon receipt of the Notice to Proceed from the Director of Engineering Services. Work will not begin on any phase or any Additional Services until requested in writing by the Consultant and written authorization is provided by the Director of Engineering Services. The anticipated schedule of the preliminary phase, design phase, bid phase, and construction phase is shown on Exhibit "A". This schedule is not to be inclusive of all additional time that may be required for review by the City staff and may be amended by or with the concurrence of the Director of Engineering Services. The Director of Engineering Services may direct the Consultant to undertake additional services or tasks provided that no increase in fee is required. Services or tasks requiring an increase of fee will be mutually agreed and evidenced in writing as an amendment to Contract for Professional Services Page 1 of 5 K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\CLARISSAJ\ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT\E12127 -NORTH BEACH AREA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS (BOND 2012)\DESIGN CONTRACT\AE AGREEMENT E12127.DOC this contract. Consultant shall notify the City of Corpus Christi within three (3) days of notice if tasks requested requires an additional fee. 4. FEE The City will pay the Consultant a fee as described in Exhibit "A" for providing services authorized, a total fee not to exceed $130,524.70. Monthly invoices will be submitted in accordance with Exhibit "C". 5. INDEMNITY Consultant shall fully indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi and its officials, officers, agents, employees, or other entity, excluding the engineer or architect or that person's agent, employee or subconsultant, over which the City exercises control ("Indemnitee") from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, to the extent that the damage is caused by or results from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property infringement or failure to pay a subcontractor or supplier committed by Consultant or its agent, Consultant under contract or another entity over which Consultant exercises control while in the exercise of rights or performance of the duties under this agreement. This indemnification does not apply to any liability resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the City or its employees, to the extent of such negligence. Consultant shall defend Indemnitee, with counsel satisfactory to the City Attorney, from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, if the claim is not based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee. If a claim is based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee, the Consultant shall reimburse the City's reasonable attorney's fees in proportion to the Consultant's liability. Consultant must advise City in writing within 24 hours of any claim or demand against City or Consultant known to Consultant related to or arising out of Consultant's activities under this Agreement. 6. INSURANCE Consultant agrees to comply with the insurance requirements in Exhibit B. 7. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT The City may terminate this contract for convenience upon seven days written notice to the Consultant at the address of record. The City may terminate this agreement for cause upon ten days written notice to the Consultant. If Consultant begins, within three days of Contract for Professional Services Page 2 of 5 K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\CLARISSAJ\ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT\E12127 -NORTH BEACH AREA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS (BOND 2012)\DESIGN CONTRACT\AE AGREEMENT E12127.DOC receipt of such notice, to correct its failure and proceeds to diligently cure such failure within the ten days, the agreement will not terminate. In the event of termination, the Consultant will be compensated for its services on all stages authorized based upon Consultant and City's estimate of the proportion of the total services actually completed at the time of termination. 8. LOCAL PARTICIPATION The City Council's stated policy is that City expenditures on contracts for professional services be of maximum benefit to the local economy. 9. ASSIGNABILITY The Consultant will not assign, transfer or delegate any of its obligations or duties in this contract to any other person without the prior written consent of the City, except for routine duties delegated to personnel of the Consultant staff. If the Consultant is a partnership, then in the event of the termination of the partnership, this contract will inure to the individual benefit of such partner or partners as the City may designate. No part of the Consultant fee may be assigned in advance of receipt by the Consultant without written consent of the City. The City will not pay the fees of expert or technical assistance and consultants unless such employment, including the rate of compensation, has been approved in writing by the City. 10.OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS All documents including contract documents (plans and specifications), record drawings, contractor's field data, inspection reports and submittal data will be the sole property of the City, may not be used again by the Consultant without the express written consent of the Director of Engineering Services. However, the Consultant may use standard details that are not specific to this project. The City agrees that any modification of the plans will be evidenced on the plans, and be signed and sealed by a professional engineer prior to re -use of modified plans. 11. STANDARD OF CARE Services provided by Consultant under this Agreement shall be performed with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by competent engineers or architects practicing in the same or similar locality and under the same or similar circumstances and professional license; and performed as expeditiously as is prudent considering the ordinary professional skill and care of a competent engineer or architect. 12. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Consultant agrees to comply with City of Corpus Christi Ordinance No. 17112 and complete the Disclosure of Interests form as part of this contract. 13. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES Contract for Professional Services Page 3 of 5 K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\CLARISSAJ\ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT\E12127 -NORTH BEACH AREA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS (BOND 2012)\DESIGN CONTRACT\AE AGREEMENT E12127.DOC For contracts that exceed $50,000, Consultant agrees to comply with Texas Government Code section 2252.908 and complete Form 1295 Certificate of Interested Parties as part of this agreement. Form 1295 requires disclosure of "interested parties" with respect to entities that enter contracts with cities. These interested parties include: (1) persons with a "controlling interest" in the entity, which includes: a. an ownership interest or participating interest in a business entity by virtue of units, percentage, shares, stock or otherwise that exceeds 10 percent; b. membership on the board of directors or other governing body of a business entity of which the board or other governing body is composed of not more than 10 members; or c. service as an officer of a business entity that has four or fewer officers, or service as one of the four officers most highly compensated by a business entity that has more than four officers. (2) a person who actively participates in facilitating a contract or negotiating the terms of a contract with a governmental entity or state agency, including a broker, intermediary, adviser or attorney for the business entity. Form 1295 must be electronically filed with the Texas Ethics Commission at https://www.ethics.state.tx.us/whatsnew/elf info form1295.htm. The form must then be printed, signed, notarized and filed with the City. For more information, please review the Texas Ethics Commission Rules at https://www.ethics.state.tx.us/legal/ch46.html. 14. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Consultant agrees to comply with Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Government Code and file Form CIQ with the City Secretary's Office, if required. For more information and to determine if you need to file a Form 010, please review the information on the City Secretary's website at http://www.cctexas.com/government/city-secretary/conflict- disclosure/index. 15. ENTIRE AGREEMENT AND CONTROLLING LAW This Agreement represents the entire and integrated Agreement between City and Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either oral or written. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both the City and Consultant. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Texas without regard to its conflicts of laws. Venue for legal proceedings lies exclusively in Nueces County, Texas. 16. CONFLICT RESOLUTION BETWEEN DOCUMENTS Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges if anything contained in the Consultant - prepared Exhibit A, Consultant's Scope of Services, or contained in any other document prepared by Consultant and included herein, is in conflict with this Agreement, this Agreement shall take precedence and control to resolve said conflict. Contract for Professional Services Page 4 of 5 K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\CLARISSAJ\ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT\E12127 -NORTH BEACH AREA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS (BOND 2012)\DESIGN CONTRACT\AE AGREEMENT E12127.DOC CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI J.H Edmonds, P.E. Date Director of Engineering Services RECOMMENDED Operating Department Date APPROVED AS TO FUNDING ONLY Office of Mgmt and Budget Date APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Legal Department ATTEST Date Date Fund Name Accounting Unit SW 2013 Bond 2012 3498-043 Street 2013 Bond 2012 3549-051 Water 2015 Bond 4097-041 WW 2015 Bond 4255-042 WW 2013 Bd 2012 4253-042 Total: $130,524.70 J E .1 E G, INC. Patrick i1. Veteto, P.E. Date Vice President 820 Buffalo Street Corpus Christi, TX 78401 (361) 887-8851 Office Account No. 550950 550950 550950 550950 550950 Activity No. E12127013198EXP E12127013549EXP E12127014097EXP E12127014255EXP E12127014253EXP Amount $32,632.00 $32,631.00 $32,631.00 $32,000.00 $630.70 Contract for Professional Services Page 5 of 5 K,ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\CLARISSAJ`.ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT\E12127 -NORTH BEACH AREA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 1BOND 2012)' DESIGN CONTRACT\AE AGREEMENT E12127.DOC EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS North Beach Area Improvements and Area Beautification (Bond 2012) Project No. E12127 I. SCOPE OF SERVICES A. BASIC SERVICES For the purpose of this contract, Preliminary Phase may include Schematic Design and Design Phase services may include Design Development as applicable to Architectural services. 1. Preliminary Phase. The Architect/Engineer A/E (also referred to as Consultant) will: a) Prcparc PowcrPoint presentation in City format for City Council Meeting. • c) na-eeti-4gs to attendees within five working days of the meeting. Provide scope of geotechnical testing requirements to the City's Geotechnical Consultant. information provided by the City pertaining to the project area. Dcvclop prcliminary rcquircmcnts for utility relocations replacements or upgrades. • petentiabejest-needs. Develop preliminary street cross section recommendations. Prcparc conccptual lifc cycle cost estimate with recommended pavement sections using Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) "Real Cost" Program. Identify right of way acquisition requirements and illustrate on a schematic strip map. Prepare prelimina y opinions of probable construction costs for the recommended improvements. Develop drainage area boundary map for existing an -d -deposed drainage areas ccrved. Conduct the hydraulic analysis to quantify the storm sewer design of existing and proposed systems. Include the analysis of inlet capacity. that may have existing facilities and must relocated to accommodate the proposed improvements. 1) Coordinate with AEP and City Traffic Engineering to identify location of electrical power conduit for street lighting and traffic signalization. ni) Identify and analyze requirements of governmental authorities having jurisdiction to approvc dcsign of the Project including permitting, environmental, historical, n) o) school districts (CCISD, FBISD, etc.) community groups, TDLR, etc. Identify and recommend public outreach and community stakeholder requirements. Review City provided preliminary Traffic impact asccscment and providc recommendation for integration and/or additional requirements as appropriate. required per City Plan Preparation Standards Contract Format (CPPSCF). Engineering Letter Report to include: EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 11 Revised November 26, 2013 1 Provide a concise presentation of pertinent factors, sketches, designs, cross sections, and parameters which will or may impact the design, including engineering design basis, preliminary layout sketches, construction wad-req-61+reme s, conformance to master plans, identification of needed additional services, identification of needed permits and environmental consideration, existing and proposed utilities, identification of quality and • - - - -tion, and other factors required for a 111. prsional-design. Include existing site photos. Provide opinion of probable construction co.As. jurisdiction to approve design of the Project including permitting, agent or with City participation and coordinate with agencies such as RTA, CDBG, USPS, CCISD, community groups, TDLR, etc. on cast sates toward City opera, which this project will affect. 7 Provide anticipated index of drawings and specifications. 8. Provide a summary table & required ROW parcels. Draft Engineering Letter Report. Submit computer model file, results and calculatlens used to analyze drainage. t) u) on the Draft Engineering Letter Report as scheduled by City Project Manager. Assimilate all City review comments of the Draft Engineering Letter Report and hard copies using City Standards as applicable) suitable for reproduction. Assist City in presenting summary of EL R findings to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Subcommittee and the Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC). Prepare PowerPoint presentation, handouts and exhibits for meeting. Provide follow up and response to comments. City staff will provide one set only of the following information (as applicable): a) Electronic index and database of City's record drawing and record information. b) Requested record drawings and record information in electronic format as available from City Engineering files. c) Provide the budget for the Project specifying the funds available for the construction contract. d) A copy of existing studies and plans. (as available from City Engineering files). e) Field location of existing city utilities. (A/E to coordinate with City Operating Departments.) f) Applicable Master Plans and GIS mapping are available on the City's website. g) City Control survey Bench marks and coordinates. Any information marked proprietary, or copyrighted, provided by the City is authorized for use only by A/E, and only for the intended purpose of this project. Any unauthorized use or EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 11 Revised November 26, 2013 distribution of information marked proprietary, or copyrighted, provided under this contract is strictly prohibited. 2. Design Phase. Upon approval of the preliminary phase, designated by receiving authorization to proceed, the A/E will: a) Provide coordination with electric and communication utility companies and private pipeline companies that may have existing facilities and must relocated to accommodate the proposed improvements. The City will provide a list of utility franchises within the Project area. b) materials and/or contaminated soils that may be discovered during construction. c) Prepare construction documents in City standard format for the work identified in the approved ELR under the previous contract. For construction plans that include improvements or modifications to the storm water, water and wastewater systems within the project limits, include standard City of Corpus Christi detail sheets as appropriate. d) Prepare construction plans in compliance with CPPSCF using English units on 11"x 17". i) Prepare Traffic Control and Construction Sequencing Plans. The TCP will include construction sequencing, typical cross section and construction phasing plan sheets, warning and barricades, as well as standards sheets for barricades, traffic control plan, work zone pavement markings and signage. Preparation of specific traffic control plans is not included in the scope of this contract. The Contractor shall be responsible for preparation and approval of specific Traffic Control plans appropriate to the Contractor's means and methods. ii) Provide Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, including construction drawings. Prepare Stormwater Best Management Practices construction drawings. Contractor is responsible for preparing and maintaining a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for himself and for the City. The SWPPP shall include the construction drawings prepared by the A/E. e) Furnish one (1) set of the interim plans (60% submittal - electronic and full sic hard 11"X17" copies using City Standards as applicable) to the City staff for review and approval purposes with estimates of probable construction costs. Identify distribution list for plans and bid documents to all affected franchise utilities. i) Required with the interim plans is a "Plan Executive Summary", project checklist & drawing checklist, which will identify and summarize the project by distinguishing key elements and opinion of probable project costs. ii) Attend 60% submittal meeting with City Staff to assist staff in review of 60% submittal. f) Hold Project 60% review Submittal meeting. Prepare meeting agenda and distribute meeting minutes to attendees within five working days of the meeting. Assimilate all review comments, as appropriate and, upon Notice to Proceed. h) review and approveses with revised estimates of probable costs. Hold Project 90% review meeting. Prepare meeting agenda and distribute meeting meetings to attendees within five working days of the meeting. Assimilate all review advise City of responding and non responding participants as appropriate and, upon Notice to Proceed. EXHIBIT "A" Page 3 of 11 Revised November 26, 2013 i) Provide one (1) set of the final (100%) plans (unsealed and unstamped - electronic and hard copy using City Standards as applicable) for City's final review. j) Assimilate all final review comments. Upon approval by the Director of Engineering Services, provide one (1) set of the final plans and contract documents (electronic and hard copy using City Standards as applicable) suitable for reproduction. Said bid documents henceforth become the shared intellectual property of the City of Corpus Christi and the Consultant. The City agrees that any modifications of the submitted final plans (for other uses by the City) will be evidenced on the plans and be signed and sealed by a professional engineer prior to re -use of modified plans. k) Provide Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) measures to ensure that all submittals of the interim, pre -final (if required), and final complete plans and complete bid documents with specifications accurately reflect the percent completion designated and do not necessitate an excessive amount of revision and correction by City. Additional revisions or design submittals are required (and within the scope of Consultant's duties under this contract) if, in the opinion of the City Engineer or designee, Consultant has not adequately addressed City -provided review comments or provided submittals in accordance with City standards.. 1) Prepare and submit monthly status rcports to the Projcct Managcr no latcr than the last Wcdnccday of tach month with action itcms dcvclopcd from monthly progrc , and rcvicw mcctings. See attachment 'A' for required form. (NOT INCLUDED IN THIS CONTRACT) m) Provide copy of contract documents along with appropriate fee to Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR) for review and approval of accessibility requirements for pedestrian improvements. (If AUTHORIZED as an Additional Service.) The City staff will: a) Designate an individual to have responsibility, authority, and control for coordinating activities for the construction contract awarded. City during the Design Phase. b) Provide the budget for the Project specifying the funds available for the construction contract. c) Provide electronic copy of the City's standard specifications, standard detail sheets, standard and special provisions, and forms for required bid documents. 3. Bid Phase. The A/E will: a) Prcparc draft Authorization to Advertise (ATA) from City provided example. b) Participate in the pre-bid conference and provide a meeting agenda for critical construction activities and elements impacted the project. c) Assist the City in solicitation of bids by identification of prospective bidders, and review of bids by solicited interests. d) Review all pre-bid questions and submissions concerning the bid documents and prepare, in the City's format, for the Engineering Services' approval, any addenda or other revisions necessary to inform contractors of approved changes prior to bidding. e) Attend bid opening, analyze bids, evaluate, prepare bid tabulation, and make recommendation concerning award of the contract. f) In the event the lowest responsible bidder's bid exceeds the project budget as revised by the Engineering Services in accordance with the A/E's design phase estimate required above, the Engineer will, at its expense, confer with City staff and make such revisions to the bid documents as the City staff deems necessary to re - advertise that particular portion of the Project for bids. EXHIBIT "A" Page 4 of 11 Revised November 26, 2013 g) Prepare Agenda Memoranda and PowerPoint presentation in City format for City Council Meeting. The City staff will: a) Arrange and pay for printing of all documents and addenda to be distributed to prospective bidders. b) Advertise the Project for bidding, maintain the list of prospective bidders, receive and process deposits for all bid documents, issue (with the assistance of the A/E) any addenda, prepare and supply bid tabulation forms, and conduct bid opening. c) Receive the Engineer's recommendation concerning bid evaluation and recommendation and prepare agenda materials for the City Council concerning bid awards. d) Prepare, review and provide copies of the contract for execution between the City and the contractor. - -- include the following: a) Participate in pre construction meeting conference and provide a recommended agcnda for critical construction activities and elements impacting the project. b) Review, Contractor submittals and operating and maintenance manuals for conformance to contract documents. c) Review and interpret field and laboratory tests. d) Provide interpretations and clarifications of the contract documents for the contractor and authorizc rcquircd changcs, which do not affcct thc contractor's pricc and aro not contrary to the general interest of the City under the contract. e) Make regular visits to the site of the Project to confer with the City project inspector and contractor to obscrvc thc gcncral progresc and quality of work, and to determine, in general, if the work is being done in accordance with the contract f) g) h) continuous monitoring of the progress of construction. City. Review, evaluate and recommend for City consideration Contractor Value Engineering proposal. Attend final inspection with City staff, provide punch list items for Contractor successful completion of the project. i) Review Contractor -provided construction "red -line" drawings. Prepare Project record drawings and provide a reproducible set and electronic file (AutoCAD r.14 or later) within two (2) months of final acceptance of the project. All drawings shall be CADD drawn using dwg format in AutoCAD, and graphics data will be in dxf format with each layer being provided in a separate file. Attribute data will be provided in ASCII format in tabular form. All electronic data will be compatible with the City GIS system. (MOVED TO ADDITIONAL SERVICES) The City staff will: a) Provide all Construction Administration and Construction Observation Services. b) Designate an individual to have responsibility, authority, and control for coordinating activities for the City during the Construction Phase. EXHIBIT "A" Page 5 of 11 Revised November 26, 2013 B. ADDITIONAL SERVICES This section defines the scope of additional services that may only be included as part of this contract if authorized by the Director of Engineering Services. A/E may not begin work on any services under this section without specific written authorization by the Director of Engineering Services. Fees for Additional Services are an allowance for potential services to be provided and will be negotiated by the Director of Engineering Services as required. The A/E shall, with written authorization by the Director of Engineering Services, perform the following: 1. Permit Preparation. Furnish the City all engineering data and documentation necessary for all required permits. The A/E will prepare this documentation for all required signatures. The A/E will prepare and submit identified permits as applicable to the appropriate local, state, and federal authorities, including: a) Union Pacific Railroad, Missouri Pacific Railroad, or any other railroad operating in the ar a b) TxDOT utility permit(s) c) Wetlands Delineation and Permit d) Temporary Discharge Permit c) NPDES Permit/Amendments (including SSC, NOI NOT) f) Texas Commission of Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Permits/Amendments g) Nueces County h) Texas Historical Commission (THC) i) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) j) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) k) United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) I) Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR) m) Texas General Land Office (TGLO) n) Other agency project specific permits 2. Right of Way (ROW) Acquisition Survey and Parcel Descriptions. All work must comply Manual of Practice for Land Surveying in the State of Texas, Ninth Edition. All work must be tied to and in conformance with the City's Global Positioning System (GPS) control network. All work must comply with all TxDOT requirements as applicable. a) Pcrform surveys to determine apparent right of way widths. b) Research plats, ROW maps, deed, easements, and survey for fence corners, monuments, and iron pins within the existing ROW and analyze to establish existing apparent ROW. NE must obtain Title Commitments from a local title company and provide copies to the City. Title Commitments shall identify title ownership and any title encumbrances to all right of way to be acquired. c) Provide a preliminary base map containing apparent ROW, which will be u: -.;cd bytho NE to develop the proposed alignment and its position relative to the existing and proposed ROW. This preliminary base map must show lot or property lines, land ownership and addresses as per appraisal district records. d) Prepare Metes and Bounds Instruments with supporting exhibits as required and agreed upon, subsequent to the ELR acceptance, for ROW parcels, utility caccmcnts and temporary construction casements. c) Sct property corncrs and prepare right of way strip parcel map depicting all parcels proposed for acquisition. Metes and bounds descriptions must indicate parent tract areas based on the most accurate information available. Strip map will show entire parent tracts at "not to scale" and for information only. All existing easements within the parcels to be acquired and those within adjacent parcels must be shown. EXHIBIT "A" Page 6 of 11 Revised November 26, 2013 f) Prepare individual signed and sealed parcel maps and legal descriptions for the required right of way acquisition for parcels and easements. A strip map showing all parcels required will be submitted along with parcel descriptions. Additional fees may be reg i -ed in resolving bounda Ge-41+sts between Owners. A/E shall submit parcel maps and legal descriptions prior to the 60% submittal. 2. Topographic Survey. All work must be tied to and conform with the City's Global Positioning System (GPS) control network and comply with Category 6, Condition I specifications of the Texas Society of Professional Surveyors' Manual of Practice for Land Surveying in the State of Texas, Ninth Edition. Include reference to a minimum of two (2) found boundary monuments from the project area. a) Establish Horizontal and Vertical Control. b) Establish both primary and secondary horizontal/vertical control. c) Set project control points for Horizontal and Vertical Control outside the limits of project construction disturbance. d) Horizontal control will be based on NAD 83 State plane coordinates (South Zone), and the data will have no adjustment factor applied — i.e. — the coordinate data will remain in grid. e) Vertical control will be based on NAVD 88. f) All control work will be established using conventional (non -GPS) methods. Perform topographic surveys to gather existing condition information. g) Locate proposed soil/pavement core holes as drilled by the City's Geotechnical Engineering Consultant. h) Obtain x, y, and zcoordinates of all accessible existing sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water and gas lines as well as any other lines owned by third -parties and locate all visible utilities, wells and signs within the apparent ROW width along project limits. No utility connections will be shown. Surveying services, related to subsurface utility engineering (SUE) shall be provided as part of the scope of work for SUE. i) Locate improvements within the apparent ROW. j) Locate and identify trees, at least five inches in diameter within the apparent ROW. k) Generate electronic planimetric base map for use in project design. Environmental Issues. Identify and develop a scope of work for any testing, handling and disposal of hazardous materials and/or contaminated soils that may be discovered during construction. 5. Subsurface Utility Engineering a) Providc subsurfacc utility cnginccring in accordancc with ASCE Standard "ASCE C I, 38 02, Standard Guidclinc for the Collcction and Dcpiction of Existing Subsurfacc Utility Data" including, but not limitcd to, hydro cxcavation. The propoccd cubcurfacc utility investigation will be as follows: i) Excavation The survey scope includes working with a subsurface utility cxcavator to perform Quality Laval A invcstigation of underground utilities in specified areas through the project limit. (Quality Level A involves the use of nondestructive digging equipment at critical points to determine the horizontal and vertical position of underground utilities, as well as the type, quality level will be physically located and tied to the topographic survey control. The utility will be identified and an elevation will be obtained to the top of the utility. ii) Utility Location The survey scope includes locating certain utilities to Quality Level B (Quality Level B involves surveying visible above ground EXHIBIT "A" Page 7 of 11 Revised November 26, 2013 utility facilities, such as manholes, valve boxes acts, etc., and correlating this information with existing utility records.) These utilities will be located by obtaining a One Call Notice and measuring the marked locations. Quality Level C. Locations will be based on the surveyed locations of acccssiblc storm water manholes and drainage inlets. iv) Wastewater Wastewater facilities within the project limits will be located to Quality Level C. Locations will be based on the surveyed locations of construction related excavation shall be located at Quality Level A. v) Water Water facilities within the project limits will be located to Quality Level A. by the A/E. The City of Corpus Christi Gas Department will provide Quality Level C. The NE will coordinate this activity. vii) Add SUE findings to topographic survey. b) Inform local franchises-w#ese utilities fall within the footprint of construction related cxcavation of the potcntial for cncountcring thcir utility linos during construction. A 3. Public Meetings (1 Meeting). Participate in one (1) public meeting. Prepare exhibits for meetings. Provide follow-up and response to citizen comments as requested. Revise contract drawings to address citizen comments, as directed by the City. 4. Construction Phase Assistance (Time and Materials upon Request). A/E will provide the City with assistance, as requested, during the construction phase of the Project on a Time and Materials basis. Requests for services from the A/E shall be submitted to the A/E via email from City staff (Construction Inspection or Engineering Services) and shall include Calendar Meeting Requests. Verbal requests for services must be followed by an email to the A/E prior to action being taken by the A/E. Receipt of email requests, including Meeting Requests, from City Staff shall be considered by the A/E as Authorization to Proceed on the requested services. Services provided under this line item shall be invoiced to the City monthly based upon the attached Table 1— Rate Schedule and shall include time spent during the invoicing period. If it is apparent that additional efforts will be required beyond the estimated Contract budget after 75% of the estimated budget for this Line Item has been spent, the A/E will prepare a Contract Amendment for additional fees based upon an estimate of the amount of effort remaining to complete the Project. Work will not proceed beyond the approved budget. The following services are excluded from this Contract: a) Preparation of change orders; b) Review of shop drawings. (This does not exclude review of material submittals, if requested.); c) Review/approval of Contractor pay requests; and d) Preparation of a Certificate of Completion at the end of the Project. Start up Services. Provide on-site services and verification for all start up procedures needed and required. EXHIBIT "A" Page 8 of 11 Revised November 26, 2013 9. Warranty Phase. Provide a maintenance guaranty inspection toward the end of the one maintain, repair, fix, restore, patch, or replace improvement under the maintenance guaranty terms of the contract. Document the condition and prepare a report for the City staff of the locations and conditions requiring action, with its recommendation for the method or action to best correct defective conditions and submit to City Staff. Complete the inspection and prepare the report no later than sixty (60) days prior to the end of the maintenance guaranty period. Preparation of Record Drawings. Review Contractor -provided construction "red -line" drawings. Prepare Project record drawings and provide a reproducible set and electronic file (AutoCAD r.14 or later) within two (2) months of final acceptance of the project. All drawings shall be CADD drawn using dwgformat in AutoCAD, and graphics data will be in dxfformat with each layer being provided in a separate file. Attribute data will be provided in ASCII format in tabular form. All electronic data will be compatible with the City GIS system. Provide the services above authorized in addition to those items shown on Exhibit "A-1" Task List, which provides supplemental description to Exhibit "A". Note: The Exhibit "A-1" Task List does not supersede supplements Exhibit "A". II. SCHEDULE Date Activity Begin Field Work Upon receipt of executed contract and NTP from City Submit 60% Design 4 Months after receipt of NTP from City City Review 1 Month Submit 100% Design 2 Weeks after receipt of 60% comments from City City Review 1 Month Submit Sealed Plans & Docs 2 Weeks after receipt of 100% comments from City Advertise for Bids 2 Weeks after Sealed Submittal Pre -Bid Conference 2 Weeks after Advertisement Receive Bids 4 Weeks after Advertisement Contract Award 4 Weeks after receipt of Bids Begin Construction 4 Weeks after Award of Contract Complete Construction Approximately 6 Months after Begin Construction III. FEES A. Fee for Basic Services. The City will pay the A/E a fixed fee for providing for all "Basic Services" authorized as per the table below. The fees for Basic Services will not exceed those identified and will be full and total compensation for all services outlined in Section I.A.1-3 above, and for all expenses incurred in performing these services. The fee for this project is subject to the availability of funds. The Engineer may be directed to suspend work pending receipt and appropriation of funds. For services provided in Section I.A.1-3, A/E will submit monthly EXHIBIT "A" Page 9 of 11 Revised November 26, 2013 statements for basic services rendered. The statements will be based upon A/E's estimate (and with City's concurrence) of the proportion of the total services actually completed at the time of billing. City will make prompt monthly payments in response to A/E's monthly statements. B. Fee for Additional Services. For authorized Additional Services, the NE will submit monthly statements for services rendered. For Fixed Fee Additional Services Line Items, the statements will be based upon A/E's estimate (and with City's concurrence) of the proportion of the total services actually completed at the time of billing. For Time and Materials Additional Services, the statements will be based upon A/E's time spent during the period of time covered by the invoice and based upon the attached Table 1 - Rate Schedule. For services authorized by the Director of Engineering Services under Section I.B. "Additional Services," the City will pay the A/E a not -to - exceed fee as per the table below: Summary of Fees 1. Permitting: TDLR (FF) (Authorized) Street Storm- Water Water Waste - Water Gas Total Basic Services Fees 1. Preliminary Phase (FF) $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 2. Design Phase (FF) $ 39,909.20 $ 22,805.25 $ 4,988.65 $ 3,563.33 $ 0.00 $ 71,266.43 3. Bid Phase (FF) $ 2,195.32 $ 1,254.47 $ 274.41 $ 196.00 $ 0.00 $ 3,920.20 Subtotal Basic Services Fees $ 42,104.52 $ 24,059.72 $ 5,263.06 $ 3,759.33 $ 0.00 $ 75,186.63 1. Permitting: TDLR (FF) (Authorized) $ 749.07 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 749.07 2. Topographic Survey (FF) $ 12,826.80 $ 7,329.60 $ 1,603.35 $ 1,145.25 $ 0.00 $ 22,905.00 (Authorized) 3. Public Meeting (1 Meeting) (FF) $ 1,256.46 $ 717.99 $ 157.05 $ 112.19 $ 0.00 $ 2,243.69 (Authorized) 4. Construction Phase Assistance (T&M) $ 13,945.90 $ 7,969.09 $ 1,743.23 $ 1,245.16 $ 0.00 $ 24,903.38 (Authorized) 5. Preparation of Record Drawings (FF) $ 2,540.68 $ 1,451.81 $ 317.59 $ 226.85 $ 0.00 $ 4,536.93 (Authorized) Sub -Total Additional Services Fees $ 31,318.91 $ 17,468.49 $ 3,821.22 $ 2,729.45 $ 0.00 $ 55,338.07 Total Authorized Fee $ 73,423.43 $ 41,528.21 $ 9,084.28 $ 6,488.78 $ 0.00 $ 130,524.70 (Notes: 'FF" designates Line Items to be invoiced on a Fixed Fee basis, and 'T&M' designates Line Items to be invoiced on a Time & Materials basis. 'AUTHORIZED' constitutes "written authorization to proceed" on an Additional Services Line Item.) EXHIBIT "A" Page 10 of 11 Revised November 26, 2013 EXHIBIT A-1 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS North Beach Area Improvements and Area Beautification (Bond 2012) Project No. E12127 TASK LIST GENERAL The North Beach Area Improvements and Area Beautification (Bond 2012) Project includes Design and Bid Phase services and associated Additional Services, as described herein, for the installation of new curb ramps along the east side of Surfside Blvd. between Burleson St. and Coastal Ave., street reclamation on Breakwater Ave., Bridgeport Ave., and Coastal Ave. between N. Shoreline Blvd. and Surfside Blvd. and on N. Shoreline Blvd. between Pearl Ave. and Coastal Ave., new pavement markings and incidental utility improvements within the project area. This contract is based upon proposed improvements with a total estimated construction cost of $1,100,000. Exhibit "A", I. A. - BASIC SERVICES Preliminary Phase Preliminary Phase Services are excluded from this Contract. Design Phase (Fixed Fee) Provide Design Phase Services in accordance with Exhibit `A' of the Contract for Professional Services with the following conditions: Exhibit "A", I. A. 2 - Clarification 1. A/E will submit all Contract deliverables to the City, only, in accordance with the Contract requirements. The City will distribute deliverables to Third -Party Reviewers at its discretion and coordinate with Third -Party Reviewers to receive comments. The City will incorporate any comments received from Third -Party Reviewers deemed appropriate into the City's comments for discussion at the appropriate meeting. To prevent miscommunications during the Design Phase, A/E's point of contact for Project decisions will be the City's Project Manager. Exhibit "A", I. A. 2. a) - Clarification Coordination with AEP to convert their existing overhead infrastructure in the project area to underground infrastructure is not included in the scope of work of this Contract. EXHIBIT "A-1" Page 1 of 3 Exhibit "A", I. A. 2. d) - Clarification The design of temporary traffic control measures shall consist of the preparation of Advanced Warning Signage Plans and inclusion of typical examples of traffic control measures for certain situations. The design of specific traffic control measures for the entire project is not included in the scope of work of this Contract. The Contractor is responsible for the preparation and approval of specific traffic control plan(s) that coincide with his approach to constructing the project — subject to the Project phasing stipulated in the construction documents - and may incorporate the typical examples provided in the construction plans. Bid Phase (Fixed Fee) Provide Bid Phase Services in accordance with Exhibit `A of the Contract for Professional Services with the following exception: Preparation of a CivCast bid spreadsheet is not included in the scope of services of this Contract. Construction Phase Construction Phase Services as described in Exhibit "A", I. A. 4. are excluded from this Contract. Construction Phase Assistance will be provided by the A/E as a Time & Materials Additional Service upon request as described in Exhibit CA. Exhibit "A", I. B. - ADDITIONAL SERVICES (Subject to Authorization) 1. Permitting (Fixed Fee) • TDLR Registration: Submit construction plans and specifications to a Registered ADA Specialist (RAS) for review and approval and registration with the TDLR; Provide coordination efforts, as necessary. 2. Topographic Survey (Fixed Fee) Services will be provided in accordance with Exhibit `A of the Contract for Professional Services. The scope of topographic survey services shall be limited to surface improvements along Breakwater Avenue, Bridgeport Avenue and Coastal Avenue between N. Shoreline Boulevard and Surfside Boulevard and surface improvements at the curb ramps along the east side of Surfside Boulevard between Coastal Avenue and Burleson Street. EXHIBIT "A-1" Page 2 of 3 3. Public Meeting (1 Meeting) (Fixed Fee) Services will be provided in accordance with Exhibit `A' of the Contract for Professional Services. 4. Construction Phase Assistance (Time and Materials) Services will be provided in accordance with Exhibit `A' of the Contract for Professional Services. 5. Preparation of Record Drawings (Fixed Fee) Services will be provided in accordance with Exhibit `A' of the Contract for Professional Services. Exhibit "A", III. Fees The fees proposed within this Contract are contingent upon the combination of this project and City Project No. E12129, such that LJA will only prepare one (1) set of bid documents for both projects, and both projects will be bid and constructed together as one (1) project. EXHIBIT "A-1" Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT B Insurance Requirements Pre -Design, Design and General Consulting Contracts 1.1 Consultant must not commence work under this agreement until all required insurance has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Consultant must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. 1.2 Consultant must furnish to the Director of Engineering Services with the signed agreement a copy of Certificates of Insurance (COI) with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. A waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with COI. Project name and or number must be listed in Description Box of COI. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -written day notice of cancellation, required on all certificates or by applicable policy endorsements Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY (Errors and Omissions) $1,000,000 Per Claim (Defense costs shall be outside policy limits) If claims made policy, retro date must be prior to inception of agreement, have extended reporting period provisions and identify any limitations regarding who is insured. 1.3 In the event of accidents of any kind related to this agreement, Consultant must furnish the City with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. 1.4 Consultant shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Consultant's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. Consultant is required to provide City with renewal Certificates. 1.5 Consultant shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Consultant shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Engineering Services P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 1.6 Consultant agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: 1.6.1 Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation, non -renewal or material change in coverage, and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. 1.7 Within five (5) calendar days of a suspension, cancellation or non -renewal of coverage, Consultant shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Consultant's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 1.8 In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Consultant's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Consultant to remove the exhibit hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) if any, which become due to Consultant hereunder until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. 1.9 Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Consultant's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this agreement. 1.10 It is agreed that Consultant's insurance shall be deemed primary and non- contributory with respect to any insurance or self-insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this agreement. 1.11 It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. Basic Services: Preliminary Phase Design Phase Bid Phase Report Phase Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Additional Services: Permitting Warranty Phase Inspection Platting Survey Reporting O & M Manuals SCADA Subtotal Additional Services Summary of Fees Basic Services Fees Additional Services Fees Total of Fees 71 M aux c0 7' CD a — rt o h 0 PROJECT NAME Project No. EXXXXX Invoice No. 12345 Invoice Date: Total Amount Previous Total Percent Contract Amd No. 1 Amd No. 2 Contract Invoiced Invoice Invoice Complete $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0% 0 0 0 0 $0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 0% TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0% City of Corpus Christi SUPPLIER NUMBER TO BE ASSIGNED BY CITY PURCHASING DIVISION CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definitions. COMPANY NAME: LJA Engineering, Inc. P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: 820 Buffalo Street FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 4. Association CITY: Corpus Christi ZIP: 78401 2. Partnership 5. Other 3. Sole Owner DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest'' constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name NA Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name N:'A Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." �ne Board, Commission or Committee F -rr . r7. - r, r Fr j 4qr ,u ( uGIG Or, nT nn 5 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name N/A Consultant EXHIBIT D PAGE 1 OF 2 FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter. unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus 1-rristi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Patrick D. Vete (Type or Print) Signature of Certifying Person: DEFINITIONS Title: Vice President Date: 04-20-16 a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part- time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies. or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." g. "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. EXHIBIT D PAGE 2 OF 2 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home rule municipal corporation, P.O. Box 9277, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas 78469-9277 (City) acting through its duly authorized City Manager or Designee (Director of Engineering Services) and LJA Engineering, Inc., a Texas corporation, 820 Buffalo Street, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas 78401 (local office), (Consultant), hereby agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF PROJECT North Beach Breakwater, Plaza, North Shoreline Repair and Enhancement (Bond 2012 Project No. E12129 The North Beach Breakwater, Plaza, North Shoreline Repair and Enhancement (Bond 2012) Project includes Design and Bid Phase services and associated Additional Services, as described herein, for the installation of pedestrian and parking improvements along N. Shoreline Boulevard between Pearl Street and Bridgeport Avenue, including existing curb and gutter modifications, new sidewalks and curb ramps, new pavement markings and limited utility improvements within the project area. The Project also includes repaving the Breakwater Plaza and repairs to the concrete cap along the breakwater structure. This contract is based upon proposed improvements with a total estimated construction cost of $1,248,000. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES The Consultant hereby agrees to perform services to complete the Project, as detailed in Exhibit "A". In addition, Consultant will provide monthly status updates (project progress or delays presented with monthly invoices) and provide contract administration services, as described in Exhibit "A", to complete the Project. Work will not begin on Additional Services until requested by the Consultant (provide breakdown of costs, schedules), and written authorization is provided by the Director of Engineering Services. 3. ORDER OF SERVICES The Consultant agrees to begin work on those authorized Basic Services for this contract upon receipt of the Notice to Proceed from the Director of Engineering Services. Work will not begin on any phase or any Additional Services until requested in writing by the Consultant and written authorization is provided by the Director of Engineering Services. The anticipated schedule of the preliminary phase, design phase, bid phase, and construction phase is shown on Exhibit "A". This schedule is not to be inclusive of all additional time that may be required for review by the City staff and may be amended by or with the concurrence of the Director of Engineering Services. The Director of Engineering Services may direct the Consultant to undertake additional services or tasks provided that no increase in fee is required. Services or tasks requiring an increase of fee will be mutually agreed and evidenced in writing as an amendment to Contract for Professional Services Page 1 of 5 K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\CLARISSAJ\ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT\E12129 - NORTH BEACH BREAKWATER, PLAZA, NORTH SHORELINE REPAIR AND ENHANCEMENT (BOND 2012)\AE AGREEMENT LJA E12129.DOC this contract. Consultant shall notify the City of Corpus Christi within three (3) days of notice if tasks requested requires an additional fee. 4. FEE The City will pay the Consultant a fee as described in Exhibit "A" for providing services authorized, a total fee not to exceed $121,358.39. Monthly invoices will be submitted in accordance with Exhibit "C". 5. INDEMNITY Consultant shall fully indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi and its officials, officers, agents, employees, or other entity, excluding the engineer or architect or that person's agent, employee or subconsultant, over which the City exercises control ("Indemnitee") from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, to the extent that the damage is caused by or results from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property infringement or failure to pay a subcontractor or supplier committed by Consultant or its agent, Consultant under contract or another entity over which Consultant exercises control while in the exercise of rights or performance of the duties under this agreement. This indemnification does not apply to any liability resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the City or its employees, to the extent of such negligence. Consultant shall defend Indemnitee, with counsel satisfactory to the City Attorney, from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, if the claim is not based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee. If a claim is based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee, the Consultant shall reimburse the City's reasonable attorney's fees in proportion to the Consultant's liability. Consultant must advise City in writing within 24 hours of any claim or demand against City or Consultant known to Consultant related to or arising out of Consultant's activities under this Agreement. 6. INSURANCE Consultant agrees to comply with the insurance requirements in Exhibit B. 7. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT The City may terminate this contract for convenience upon seven days written notice to the Consultant at the address of record. The City may terminate this agreement for cause upon ten days written notice to the Consultant. If Consultant begins, within three days of Contract for Professional Services Page 2 of 5 K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\CLARISSAJ\ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT\E12129 - NORTH BEACH BREAKWATER, PLAZA, NORTH SHORELINE REPAIR AND ENHANCEMENT (BOND 2012)\AE AGREEMENT LJA E12129.DOC receipt of such notice, to correct its failure and proceeds to diligently cure such failure within the ten days, the agreement will not terminate. In the event of termination, the Consultant will be compensated for its services on all stages authorized based upon Consultant and City's estimate of the proportion of the total services actually completed at the time of termination. 8. LOCAL PARTICIPATION The City Council's stated policy is that City expenditures on contracts for professional services be of maximum benefit to the local economy. 9. ASSIGNABILITY The Consultant will not assign, transfer or delegate any of its obligations or duties in this contract to any other person without the prior written consent of the City, except for routine duties delegated to personnel of the Consultant staff. If the Consultant is a partnership, then in the event of the termination of the partnership, this contract will inure to the individual benefit of such partner or partners as the City may designate. No part of the Consultant fee may be assigned in advance of receipt by the Consultant without written consent of the City. The City will not pay the fees of expert or technical assistance and consultants unless such employment, including the rate of compensation, has been approved in writing by the City. 10.OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS All documents including contract documents (plans and specifications), record drawings, contractor's field data, inspection reports and submittal data will be the sole property of the City, may not be used again by the Consultant without the express written consent of the Director of Engineering Services. However, the Consultant may use standard details that are not specific to this project. The City agrees that any modification of the plans will be evidenced on the plans, and be signed and sealed by a professional engineer prior to re -use of modified plans. 11. STANDARD OF CARE Services provided by Consultant under this Agreement shall be performed with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by competent engineers or architects practicing in the same or similar locality and under the same or similar circumstances and professional license; and performed as expeditiously as is prudent considering the ordinary professional skill and care of a competent engineer or architect. 12. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Consultant agrees to comply with City of Corpus Christi Ordinance No. 17112 and complete the Disclosure of Interests form as part of this contract. 13. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES Contract for Professional Services Page 3 of 5 K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\CLARISSAJ\ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT\E12129 - NORTH BEACH BREAKWATER, PLAZA, NORTH SHORELINE REPAIR AND ENHANCEMENT (BOND 2012)\AE AGREEMENT LJA E12129.DOC For contracts that exceed $50,000, Consultant agrees to comply with Texas Government Code section 2252.908 and complete Form 1295 Certificate of Interested Parties as part of this agreement. Form 1295 requires disclosure of "interested parties" with respect to entities that enter contracts with cities. These interested parties include: (1) persons with a "controlling interest" in the entity, which includes: a. an ownership interest or participating interest in a business entity by virtue of units, percentage, shares, stock or otherwise that exceeds 10 percent; b. membership on the board of directors or other governing body of a business entity of which the board or other governing body is composed of not more than 10 members; or c. service as an officer of a business entity that has four or fewer officers, or service as one of the four officers most highly compensated by a business entity that has more than four officers. (2) a person who actively participates in facilitating a contract or negotiating the terms of a contract with a governmental entity or state agency, including a broker, intermediary, adviser or attorney for the business entity. Form 1295 must be electronically filed with the Texas Ethics Commission at https://www.ethics.state.tx.us/whatsnew/elf info form1295.htm. The form must then be printed, signed, notarized and filed with the City. For more information, please review the Texas Ethics Commission Rules at https://www.ethics.state.tx.us/legal/ch46.html. 14. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Consultant agrees to comply with Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Government Code and file Form CIQ with the City Secretary's Office, if required. For more information and to determine if you need to file a Form 010, please review the information on the City Secretary's website at http://www.cctexas.com/government/city-secretary/conflict- disclosure/index. 15. ENTIRE AGREEMENT AND CONTROLLING LAW This Agreement represents the entire and integrated Agreement between City and Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either oral or written. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both the City and Consultant. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Texas without regard to its conflicts of laws. Venue for legal proceedings lies exclusively in Nueces County, Texas. 16. CONFLICT RESOLUTION BETWEEN DOCUMENTS Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges if anything contained in the Consultant - prepared Exhibit A, Consultant's Scope of Services, or contained in any other document prepared by Consultant and included herein, is in conflict with this Agreement, this Agreement shall take precedence and control to resolve said conflict. Contract for Professional Services Page 4 of 5 K:\ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\CLARISSAJ\ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT\E12129 - NORTH BEACH BREAKWATER, PLAZA, NORTH SHORELINE REPAIR AND ENHANCEMENT (BOND 2012)\AE AGREEMENT LJA E12129.DOC CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI J.H Edmonds, P.E. Date Director of Engineering Services RECOMMENDED Operating Department Date APPROVED AS TO FUNDING ONLY Office of Mgmt and Budget Date APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Legal Department ATTEST Date Fund Name SW 2013 Bond 2012 Street 2013 Bond 2012 Water 2015 Bond WW 2015 Bond Total: $121,358.39 Date Accounting Unit 3498-043 3549-051 4097-041 4255-042 Pa ric . Veteto, E Date Vice President 820 Buffalo Street Corpus Christi, TX 78401 (361) 887-8851 Office Account No. 550950 550950 550950 550950 Activity No. E12129013198EXP E12129013549EXP E12129014097EXP E12129014255EXP Amount $30,340.00 $30,340.00 $30,339.00 $30,339.39 Contract for Professional Services Page 5 of 5 K ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE\CLARISSM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT\E12129 - NORTH BEACH BREAKWATER PLAZA, NORTH SHORELINE REPAIR AND ENHANCEMENT f BOND 2012,\AE AGREEMENT LJA E12129 DOC EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS North Beach Breakwater, Plaza, North Shoreline Repair and Enhancement (Bond 2012) Project No. E12129 I. SCOPE OF SERVICES A. BASIC SERVICES For the purpose of this contract, Preliminary Phase may include Schematic Design and Design Phase services may include Design Development as applicable to Architectural services. 1. Preliminary Phase. The Architect/Engineer A/E (also referred to as Consultant) will: a) Prcparc PowcrPoint presentation in City format for City Council Meeting. • c) na-eeti-4gs to attendees within five working days of the meeting. Provide scope of geotechnical testing requirements to the City's Geotechnical Consultant. information provided by the City pertaining to the project area. Dcvclop prcliminary rcquircmcnts for utility relocations replacements or upgrades. • petentiabejest-needs. Develop preliminary street cross section recommendations. Prcparc conccptual lifc cycle cost estimate with recommended pavement sections using Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) "Real Cost" Program. Identify right of way acquisition requirements and illustrate on a schematic strip map. Prepare prelimina y opinions of probable construction costs for the recommended improvements. Develop drainage area boundary map for existing used drainage areas ccrved. Conduct the hydraulic analysis to quantify the storm sewer design of existing and proposed systems. Include the analysis of inlet capacity. that may have existing facilities and must relocated to accommodate the proposed improvements. 1) Coordinate with AEP and City Traffic Engineering to identify location of electrical power conduit for street lighting and traffic signalization. rn) Identify and analyze requirements of governmental authorities having jurisdiction to approvc dcsign of the Project including permitting, environmental, historical, n) o) school districts (CCISD, FBISD, etc.) community groups, TDLR, etc. Identify and recommend public outreach and community stakeholder requirements. Review City provided preliminary Traffic impact asccscment and providc recommendation for integration and/or additional requirements as appropriate. required per City Plan Preparation Standards Contract Format (CPPSCF). Engineering Letter Report to include: EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 11 Revised November 26, 2013 1 Provide a concise presentation of pertinent factors, sketches, designs, cross sections, and parameters which will or may impact the design, including engineering design basis, preliminary layout sketches, construction wad-req-61+reme s, conformance to master plans, identification of needed additional services, identification of needed permits and environmental consideration, existing used utilities, identification of quality and • - - - -tion, and other factors required for a 111. prsional-design. Include existing site photos. Provide opinion of probable construction co.As. jurisdiction to approve design of the Project including permitting, agent or with City participation and coordinate with agencies such as RTA, CDBG, USPS, CCISD, community groups, TDLR, etc. on cost sates toward City opera, which this project will affect. 7 Provide anticipated index of drawings and specifications. 8. Provide a summary table & required ROW parcels. Draft Engineering Letter Report. Submit computer model file, results and calculatlens used to analyze drainage. t) u) on the Draft Engineering Letter Report as scheduled by City Project Manager. Assimilate all City review comments of the Draft Engineering Letter Report and hard copies using City Standards as applicable) suitable for reproduction. Assist City in presenting summary of EL R findings to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Subcommittee and the Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC). Prepare PowerPoint presentation, handouts and exhibits for meeting. Provide follow up and response to comments. City staff will provide one set only of the following information (as applicable): a) Electronic index and database of City's record drawing and record information. b) Requested record drawings and record information in electronic format as available from City Engineering files. c) Provide the budget for the Project specifying the funds available for the construction contract. d) A copy of existing studies and plans. (as available from City Engineering files). e) Field location of existing city utilities. (A/E to coordinate with City Operating Departments.) f) Applicable Master Plans and GIS mapping are available on the City's website. g) City Control survey Bench marks and coordinates. Any information marked proprietary, or copyrighted, provided by the City is authorized for use only by A/E, and only for the intended purpose of this project. Any unauthorized use or EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 11 Revised November 26, 2013 distribution of information marked proprietary, or copyrighted, provided under this contract is strictly prohibited. 2. Design Phase. Upon approval of the preliminary phase, designated by receiving authorization to proceed, the A/E will: a) Provide coordination with electric and communication utility companies and private pipeline companies that may have existing facilities and must relocated to accommodate the proposed improvements. The City will provide a list of utility franchises within the Project area. b) materials and/or contaminated soils that may be discovered during construction. c) Prepare construction documents in City standard format for the work identified in the approved ELR under the previous contract. For construction plans that include improvements or modifications to the storm water, water and wastewater systems within the project limits, include standard City of Corpus Christi detail sheets as appropriate. d) Prepare construction plans in compliance with CPPSCF using English units on 11"x 1 7". i) Prepare Traffic Control and Construction Sequencing Plans. The TCP will include construction sequencing, typical cross section and construction phasing plan sheets, warning and barricades, as well as standards sheets for barricades, traffic control plan, work zone pavement markings and signage. Preparation of specific traffic control plans is not included in the scope of this contract. The Contractor shall be responsible for preparation and approval of specific Traffic Control plans appropriate to the Contractor's means and methods. ii) Provide Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, including construction drawings. Prepare Stormwater Best Management Practices construction drawings. Contractor is responsible for preparing and maintaining a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for himself and for the City. The SWPPP shall include the construction drawings prepared by the A/E. e) Furnish one (1) set of the interim plans (60% submittal - electronic and full sic 11"x17" hard copies using City Standards as applicable) to the City staff for review and approval purposes with estimates of probable construction costs. Identify distribution list for plans and bid documents to all affected franchise utilities. i) Required with the interim plans is a "Plan Executive Summary", project checklist & drawing checklist, which will identify and summarize the project by distinguishing key elements and opinion of probable project costs. ii) Attend 60% submittal meeting with City Staff to assist staff in review of 60% submittal. f) Hold Project 60% review Submittal meeting. Prepare meeting agenda and distribute meeting minutes to attendees within five working days of the meeting. Assimilate all review comments, as appropriate and, upon Notice to Proceed. h) review and approveses with revised estimates of probable costs. Hold Project 90% review meeting. Prepare meeting agenda and distribute meeting meetings to attendees within five working days of the meeting. Assimilate all review advise City of responding and non responding participants as appropriate and, upon Notice to Proceed. EXHIBIT "A" Page 3 of 11 Revised November 26, 2013 i) Provide one (1) set of the final (100%) plans (unsealed and unstamped - electronic and hard copy using City Standards as applicable) for City's final review. j) Assimilate all final review comments. Upon approval by the Director of Engineering Services, provide one (1) set of the final plans and contract documents (electronic and hard copy using City Standards as applicable) suitable for reproduction. Said bid documents henceforth become the shared intellectual property of the City of Corpus Christi and the Consultant. The City agrees that any modifications of the submitted final plans (for other uses by the City) will be evidenced on the plans and be signed and sealed by a professional engineer prior to re -use of modified plans. k) Provide Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) measures to ensure that all submittals of the interim, pre -final (if required), and final complete plans and complete bid documents with specifications accurately reflect the percent completion designated and do not necessitate an excessive amount of revision and correction by City. Additional revisions or design submittals are required (and within the scope of Consultant's duties under this contract) if, in the opinion of the City Engineer or designee, Consultant has not adequately addressed City -provided review comments or provided submittals in accordance with City standards.. 1) Prepare and submit monthly status rcports to the Projcct Managcr no latcr than the last Wcdnccday of tach month with action itcros dcvclopcd from monthly progrc , and rcvicw mcctings. See attachment 'A' for required form. (NOT INCLUDED IN THIS CONTRACT) m) Provide copy of contract documents along with appropriate fee to Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR) for review and approval of accessibility requirements for pedestrian improvements. (If AUTHORIZED as an Additional Service.) The City staff will: a) Designate an individual to have responsibility, authority, and control for coordinating activities for the construction contract awarded. City during the Design Phase. b) Provide the budget for the Project specifying the funds available for the construction contract. c) Provide electronic copy of the City's standard specifications, standard detail sheets, standard and special provisions, and forms for required bid documents. 3. Bid Phase. The A/E will: a) Prcparc draft Authorization to Advertise (ATA) from City provided example. b) Participate in the pre-bid conference and provide a meeting agenda for critical construction activities and elements impacted the project. c) Assist the City in solicitation of bids by identification of prospective bidders, and review of bids by solicited interests. d) Review all pre-bid questions and submissions concerning the bid documents and prepare, in the City's format, for the Engineering Services' approval, any addenda or other revisions necessary to inform contractors of approved changes prior to bidding. e) Attend bid opening, analyze bids, evaluate, prepare bid tabulation, and make recommendation concerning award of the contract. f) In the event the lowest responsible bidder's bid exceeds the project budget as revised by the Engineering Services in accordance with the A/E's design phase estimate required above, the Engineer will, at its expense, confer with City staff and make such revisions to the bid documents as the City staff deems necessary to re - advertise that particular portion of the Project for bids. EXHIBIT "A" Page 4 of 11 Revised November 26, 2013 g) Prepare Agenda Memoranda and PowerPoint presentation in City format for City Council Meeting. The City staff will: a) Arrange and pay for printing of all documents and addenda to be distributed to prospective bidders. b) Advertise the Project for bidding, maintain the list of prospective bidders, receive and process deposits for all bid documents, issue (with the assistance of the A/E) any addenda, prepare and supply bid tabulation forms, and conduct bid opening. c) Receive the Engineer's recommendation concerning bid evaluation and recommendation and prepare agenda materials for the City Council concerning bid awards. d) Prepare, review and provide copies of the contract for execution between the City and the contractor. include the following: a) Participate in pre construction meeting conference and provide a recommended agcnda for critical construction activities and elements impacting the project. b) Review, Contractor submittals and operating and maintenance manuals for conformance to contract documents. c) Review and interpret field and laboratory tests. d) Provide interpretations and clarifications of the contract documents for the contractor and authorizc rcquircd changcs, which do not affect the contractor's price and are not contrary to the general interest of the City under the contract. e) Make regular visits to the site of the Project to confer with the City project inspector and contractor to obscrvc the gcncral progresc and quality of work, and to determine, in general, if the work is being done in accordance with the contract f) g) h) continuous monitoring of the progress of construction. City. Review, evaluate and recommend for City consideration Contractor Value Engineering proposal. Attend final inspection with City staff, provide punch list items for Contractor successful completion of the project. i) Review Contractor -provided construction "red -line" drawings. Prepare Project record drawings and provide a reproducible set and electronic file (AutoCAD r.14 or later) within two (2) months of final acceptance of the project. All drawings shall be CADD drawn using dwg format in AutoCAD, and graphics data will be in dxf format with each layer being provided in a separate file. Attribute data will be provided in ASCII format in tabular form. All electronic data will be compatible with the City GIS system. (MOVED TO ADDITIONAL SERVICES) The City staff will: a) Provide all Construction Administration and Construction Observation Services. b) Designate an individual to have responsibility, authority, and control for coordinating activities for the City during the Construction Phase. EXHIBIT "A" Page 5 of 11 Revised November 26, 2013 B. ADDITIONAL SERVICES This section defines the scope of additional services that may only be included as part of this contract if authorized by the Director of Engineering Services. A/E may not begin work on any services under this section without specific written authorization by the Director of Engineering Services. Fees for Additional Services are an allowance for potential services to be provided and will be negotiated by the Director of Engineering Services as required. The A/E shall, with written authorization by the Director of Engineering Services, perform the following: 1. Permit Preparation. Furnish the City all engineering data and documentation necessary for all required permits. The A/E will prepare this documentation for all required signatures. The A/E will prepare and submit identified permits as applicable to the appropriate local, state, and federal authorities, including: a) Union Pacific Railroad, Missouri Pacific Railroad, or any other railroad operating in the ar a b) TxDOT utility permit(s) c) Wetlands Delineation and Permit d) Temporary Discharge Permit c) NPDES Permit/Amendments (including SSC, NOI NOT) f) Texas Commission of Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Permits/Amendments g) Nueces County h) Texas Historical Commission (THC) i) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) j) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) k) United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) I) Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR) m) Texas General Land Office (TGLO) n) Other agency project specific permits 2. Right of Way (ROW) Acquisition Survey and Parcel Descriptions. All work must comply Manual of Practice for Land Surveying in the State of Texas, Ninth Edition. All work must be tied to and in conformance with the City's Global Positioning System (GPS) control network. All work must comply with all TxDOT requirements as applicable. a) Pcrform surveys to determine apparent right of way widths. b) Research plats, ROW maps, deed, easements, and survey for fence corners, monuments, and iron pins within the existing ROW and analyze to establish existing apparent ROW. NE must obtain Title Commitments from a local title company and provide copies to the City. Title Commitments shall identify title ownership and any title encumbrances to all right of way to be acquired. c) Provide a preliminary base map containing apparent ROW, which will be u: -.;cd bytho NE to develop the proposed alignment and its position relative to the existing and proposed ROW. This preliminary base map must show lot or property lines, land ownership and addresses as per appraisal district records. d) Prepare Metes and Bounds Instruments with supporting exhibits as required and agreed upon, subsequent to the ELR acceptance, for ROW parcels, utility caccmcnts and temporary construction asements. c) Sct property corncrs and prepare right of way strip parcel map depicting all parcels proposed for acquisition. Metes and bounds descriptions must indicate parent tract areas based on the most accurate information available. Strip map will show entire parent tracts at "not to scale" and for information only. All existing easements within the parcels to be acquired and those within adjacent parcels must be shown. EXHIBIT "A" Page 6 of 11 Revised November 26, 2013 f) Prepare individual signed and sealed parccl maps and Icgal dcscriptionc for thc parcels required will be submitted along with parcel descriptions. Additional fees may be reg i -ed in resolving bounda Ge-41+sts between Owners. A/E shall submit parcel maps and legal descriptions prior to the 60% submittal. 3. Topographic Survey All work must be tied to and conform with the City's Global Positioning System (GPS) control network and comply with Category 6, Condition I • Surveying in the State of Texas, Ninth Edition. Include reference to a minimum of two (2) found boundary monuments from the project area. a) Establish Horizontal and Vertical Control. b) Establish both primary and secondary horizontal/vertical control. c) Set project control points for Horizontal and Vertical Control outside the limits of project construction disturbance. d) Horizontal control will be based on NAD 83 State plane coordinates (South Zone), and thc data will havc no adjustmcnt factor applied i.e. the coordinate data will remain in grid. c) Vcrtical control will be bascd on NAVD 88. f) All control work will be established using conventional (non GPS) methods. Perform topographic surveys to gather existing condition information. g) Locate proposed soil/pavement core holes as drilled by the City's Geotechnical Engineering Consultant. h) Obtain x, y, and z coordinates of all accessible existing sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water and gas lines as well as any other lines owned by third parties and locate all visible utilities, wells and signs within the apparent ROW width along project limits. No utility connections will be shown. Surveying services, related to subsurface utility cnginccring (SUE) shall be providcd as part of thc scope of work for SUE. i) Locate improvements within the apparent ROW. j) Locate and identify trees, at least five inches in diameter within the apparent ROW. k) Generate electronic planimetric base map for use in project design. Environmental Issues. Identify and develop a scope of work for any testing, handling and disposal of hazardous materials and/or contaminated soils that may be discovered during construction. 5. Subsurface Utility Engineering a) Providc subsurfacc utility cnginccring in accordancc with ASCE Standard "ASCE C I, 38 02, Standard Guidclinc for thc Collcction and Dcpiction of Existing Subsurfacc Utility Data" including, but not limitcd to, hydro cxcavation. The propoccd cubcurfacc utility investigation will be as follows: i) Excavation The survey scope includes working with a subsurface utility cxcavator to perform Quality Laval A invcstigation of underground utilities in specified areas through the project limit. (Quality Level A involves the use of nondestructive digging equipment at critical points to determine the horizontal and vertical position of underground utilities, as well as the type, control. The utility will be identified and an elevation will be obtained to the top of the utility. ii) Utility Location The survey scope includes locating certain utilities to Quality Level B (Quality Level B involves surveying visible above ground EXHIBIT "A" Page 7 of 11 Revised November 26, 2013 utility facilities, such as manholes, valve boxes acts, etc., and correlating this information with existing utility records.) These utilities will be located by obtaining a One Call Notice and measuring the marked locations. Quality Level C. Locations will be based on the surveyed locations of acccssiblc storm water manholes and drainage inlets. iv) Wastewater Wastewater facilities within the project limits will be located to Quality Level C. Locations will be based on the surveyed locations of construction related excavation shall be located at Quality Level A. v) Water Water facilities within the project limits will be located to Quality Level A. by the A/E. The City of Corpus Christi Gas Department will provide Quality Level C. The NE will coordinate this activity. vii) Add SUE findings to topographic survey. b) Inform local franchises-w#ese utilities fall within the footprint of construction related cxcavation of the potcntial for cncountcring thcir utility linos during construction. A 2. Public Meeting (1 Meeting). Participate in one (1) public meeting. Prepare exhibits for meetings. Provide follow-up and response to citizen comments as requested. Revise contract drawings to address citizen comments, as directed by the City. 3. Construction Phase Assistance (Time and Materials upon Request). A/E will provide the City with assistance, as requested, during the construction phase of the Project on a Time and Materials basis. Requests for services from the A/E shall be submitted to the A/E via email from City staff (Construction Inspection or Engineering Services) and shall include Calendar Meeting Requests. Verbal requests for services must be followed by an email to the A/E prior to action being taken by the A/E. Receipt of email requests, including Meeting Requests, from City Staff shall be considered by the A/E as Authorization to Proceed on the requested services. Services provided under this line item shall be invoiced to the City monthly based upon the attached Table 1— Rate Schedule and shall include time spent during the invoicing period. If it is apparent that additional efforts will be required beyond the estimated Contract budget after 75% of the estimated budget for this Line Item has been spent, the A/E will prepare a Contract Amendment for additional fees based upon an estimate of the amount of effort remaining to complete the Project. Work will not proceed beyond the approved budget. The following services are excluded from this Contract: a) Preparation of change orders; b) Review of shop drawings. (This does not exclude review of material submittals, if requested.); c) Review/approval of Contractor pay requests; and d) Preparation of a Certificate of Completion at the end of the Project. Start up Services. Provide on-site services and verification for all start up procedures needed and required. EXHIBIT "A" Page 8 of 11 Revised November 26, 2013 9. Warranty Phase. Provide a maintenance guaranty inspection toward the end of the one maintain, repair, fix, restore, patch, or replace improvement under the maintenance guaranty terms of the contract. Document the condition and prepare a report for the City staff of the locations and conditions requiring action, with its recommendation for the method or action to best correct defective conditions and submit to City Staff. Complete the inspection and prepare the report no later than sixty (60) days prior to the end of the maintenance guaranty period. Preparation of Record Drawings. Review Contractor -provided construction "red -line" drawings. Prepare Project record drawings and provide a reproducible set and electronic file (AutoCAD r.14 or later) within two (2) months of final acceptance of the project. All drawings shall be CADD drawn using dwgformat in AutoCAD, and graphics data will be in dxfformat with each layer being provided in a separate file. Attribute data will be provided in ASCII format in tabular form. All electronic data will be compatible with the City GIS system. Provide the services above authorized in addition to those items shown on Exhibit "A-1" Task List, which provides supplemental description to Exhibit "A". Note: The Exhibit "A-1" Task List does not supersede supplements Exhibit "A". II. SCHEDULE Date Activity Begin Design Work Upon receipt of executed contract and NTP from City Submit 60% Design 4 Months after receipt of NTP from City City Review 1 Month Submit 100% Design 2 Weeks after receipt of 60% comments from City City Review 1 Month Submit Sealed Plans & Docs 2 Weeks after receipt of 100% comments from City Advertise for Bids 2 Weeks after Sealed Submittal Pre -Bid Conference 2 Weeks after Advertisement Receive Bids 4 Weeks after Advertisement Contract Award 4 Weeks after receipt of Bids Begin Construction 4 Weeks after Award of Contract Complete Construction Approximately 6 Months after Begin Construction III. FEES A. Fee for Basic Services. The City will pay the A/E a fixed fee for providing for all "Basic Services" authorized as per the table below. The fees for Basic Services will not exceed those identified and will be full and total compensation for all services outlined in Section I.A.1-3 above, and for all expenses incurred in performing these services. The fee for this project is subject to the availability of funds. The Engineer may be directed to suspend work pending receipt and appropriation of funds. For services provided in Section I.A.1-3, A/E will submit monthly statements for basic services rendered. The statements will be based upon A/E's estimate (and with City's concurrence) of the proportion of the total services actually completed at the time of billing. City will make prompt monthly payments in response to A/E's monthly statements. EXHIBIT "A" Page 9 of 11 Revised November 26, 2013 B. Fee for Additional Services. For authorized Additional Services, the NE will submit monthly statements for services rendered. For Fixed Fee Additional Services Line Items, the statements will be based upon A/E's estimate (and with City's concurrence) of the proportion of the total services actually completed at the time of billing. For Time and Materials Additional Services, the statements will be based upon A/E's time spent during the period of time covered by the invoice and based upon the attached Table 1 - Rate Schedule. For services authorized by the Director of Engineering Services under Section I.B. "Additional Services," the City will pay the A/E a not -to - exceed fee as per the table below: Summary of Fees 1. Permitting: TDLR (FF) (Authorized) Street Storm- Water Water Waste - Water Gas Total Basic Services Fees 1. Preliminary Phase (FF) $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 2. Design Phase (FF) $ 45,004.00 $ 25,716.57 $ 5,625.50 $ 4,018.21 $ 0.00 $ 80,364.28 3. Bid Phase (FF) $ 2,475.56 $ 1,414.61 $ 309.45 $ 221.04 $ 0.00 $ 4,420.66 Subtotal Basic Services Fees $ 47,479.56 $ 27,131.18 $ 5,934.95 $ 4,239.25 $ 0.00 $ 84,784.94 1. Permitting: TDLR (FF) (Authorized) $ 844.69 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 844.69 2. Public Meetings (1 Meeting) (FF) $ 1,416.87 $ 809.64 $ 177.10 $ 126.50 $ 0.00 $ 2,530.11 (Authorized) 3. Construction Phase Assistance (T&M) $ 15,726.23 $ 8,986.42 $ 1,965.77 $ 1,404.12 $ 0.00 $ 28,082.54 (Authorized) 4. Preparation of Record Drawings (FF) $ 2,865.02 $ 1,637.15 $ 358.13 $ 255.81 $ 0.00 $ 5,116.11 (Authorized) Sub -Total Additional Services Fees $ 20,852.81 $ 11,433.21 $ 2,501.00 $ 1,786.43 $ 0.00 $ 36,573.45 Total Authorized Fee $ 68,332.37 $ 38,564.39 $ 8,435.95 $ 6,025.68 $ 0.00 $ 121,358.39 (Notes: 'FF" designates Line Items to be invoiced on a Fixed Fee basis, and 'T&M' designates Line Items to be invoiced on a Time & Materials basis. 'AUTHORIZED' constitutes "written authorization to proceed" on an Additional Services Line Item.) EXHIBIT "A" Page 10 of 11 Revised November 26, 2013 EXHIBIT A-1 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS North Beach Breakwater, Plaza, North Shoreline Repair and Enhancement (Bond 2012) Project No. E12129 TASK LIST GENERAL The North Beach Breakwater, Plaza, North Shoreline Repair and Enhancement (Bond 2012) Project includes Design and Bid Phase services and associated Additional Services, as described herein, for the installation of pedestrian and parking improvements along N. Shoreline Boulevard between Pearl Street and Bridgeport Avenue, including existing curb and gutter modifications, new sidewalks and curb ramps, new pavement markings and limited utility improvements within the project area. The Project also includes repaving the Breakwater Plaza and repairs to the concrete cap along the breakwater structure. This contract is based upon proposed improvements with a total estimated construction cost of $1,248,000. Exhibit "A", I. A. - BASIC SERVICES Preliminary Phase Preliminary Phase Services are excluded from this Contract. Design Phase (Fixed Fee) Provide Design Phase Services in accordance with Exhibit 'A' of the Contract for Professional Services with the following conditions: Exhibit "A", I. A. 2 - Clarification A/E will submit all Contract deliverables to the City, only, in accordance with the Contract requirements. The City will distribute deliverables to Third -Party Reviewers at its discretion and coordinate with Third -Party Reviewers to receive comments. The City will incorporate any comments received from Third -Party Reviewers deemed appropriate into the City's comments for discussion at the appropriate meeting. To prevent miscommunications during the Design Phase, A/E's point of contact for Project decisions will be the City's Project Manager. EXHIBIT "A-1" Page 1 of 3 Exhibit "A", I. A. 2. a) - Clarification Coordination with AEP to convert their existing overhead infrastructure in the project area to underground infrastructure is not included in the scope of work of this Contract. Exhibit "A", I. A. 2. d) - Clarification The design of temporary traffic control measures shall consist of the preparation of Advanced Warning Signage Plans and inclusion of typical examples of traffic control measures for certain situations. The design of specific traffic control measures for the entire project is not included in the scope of work of this Contract. The Contractor is responsible for the preparation and approval of specific traffic control plan(s) that coincide with his approach to constructing the project — subject to the Project phasing stipulated in the construction documents - and may incorporate the typical examples provided in the construction plans. Bid Phase (Fixed Fee) Provide Bid Phase Services in accordance with Exhibit `A of the Contract for Professional Services with the following exception: Preparation of a CivCast bid spreadsheet is not included in the scope of services of this Contract. Construction Phase Construction Phase Services as described in Exhibit "A", I. A. 4. are excluded from this Contract. Construction Phase Assistance will be provided by the A/E as a Time & Materials Additional Service upon request as described in Exhibit CA. Exhibit "A", I. B. - ADDITIONAL SERVICES (Subject to Authorization) 1. Permitting (Fixed Fee) • TDLR Registration: Submit construction plans and specifications to a Registered ADA Specialist (RAS) for review and approval and registration with the TDLR; Provide coordination efforts, as necessary. NOTE: USACE permitting is not anticipated as necessary and is not included in the scope of work of this contract. EXHIBIT "A-1" Page 2 of 3 2. Public Meeting (1 Meeting) (Fixed Fee) Services will be provided in accordance with Exhibit `A' of the Contract for Professional Services. 3. Construction Phase Assistance (Time and Materials) Services will be provided in accordance with Exhibit `A' of the Contract for Professional Services. 4. Preparation of Record Drawings (Fixed Fee) Services will be provided in accordance with Exhibit `A' of the Contract for Professional Services. Exhibit "A", III. Fees The fees proposed within this Contract are contingent upon the combination of this project and City Project No. E12127, such that LJA will only prepare one (1) set of bid documents for both projects, and both projects will be bid and constructed together as one (1) project. EXHIBIT "A-1" Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT B Insurance Requirements Pre -Design, Design and General Consulting Contracts 1.1 Consultant must not commence work under this agreement until all required insurance has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Consultant must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. 1.2 Consultant must furnish to the Director of Engineering Services with the signed agreement a copy of Certificates of Insurance (COI) with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. A waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with COI. Project name and or number must be listed in Description Box of COI. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -written day notice of cancellation, required on all certificates or by applicable policy endorsements Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY (Errors and Omissions) $1,000,000 Per Claim (Defense costs shall be outside policy limits) If claims made policy, retro date must be prior to inception of agreement, have extended reporting period provisions and identify any limitations regarding who is insured. 1.3 In the event of accidents of any kind related to this agreement, Consultant must furnish the City with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. 1.4 Consultant shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Consultant's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. Consultant is required to provide City with renewal Certificates. 1.5 Consultant shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Consultant shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Engineering Services P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 1.6 Consultant agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: 1.6.1 Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation, non -renewal or material change in coverage, and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. 1.7 Within five (5) calendar days of a suspension, cancellation or non -renewal of coverage, Consultant shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Consultant's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 1.8 In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Consultant's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Consultant to remove the exhibit hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) if any, which become due to Consultant hereunder until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. 1.9 Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Consultant's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this agreement. 1.10 It is agreed that Consultant's insurance shall be deemed primary and non- contributory with respect to any insurance or self-insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this agreement. 1.11 It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. X LUX Z X I- H. O ✓ O Z W Z as O 5 >• > a E = a Invoice Date: aw t.) aw a E 0 U w co V c '0 N d 0 O . •5 0 a) c> 0 — c 72) O• • E >> Q E O o U N Z Q z E 0 U Basic Services: \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ \ 0 0 O O \ 0 O 0'9 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O 0'9 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O O O O O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Preliminary Phase Design Phase Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Additional Services: O) c E 0 Warranty Phase 0 & M Manuals O U Subtotal Additional Services Basic Services Fees Additional Services Fees Total of Fees Exhibit "C" Page 1 of 1 City of Corpus Christi SUPPLIER NUMBER TO BE ASSIGNED BY CITY PURCHASING DIVISION CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definitions. COMPANY NAME: LJA Engineering, Inc. P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: 820 Buffalo Street FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 4. Association CITY: Corpus Christi ZIP: 78401 2. Partnership 5. Other 3. Sole Owner DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest'' constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name NA Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name N:'A Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." �ne Board, Commission or Committee F -rr . r7. - r, r Fr j 4qr ,u ( uGIG Or, nT nn 5 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name N/A Consultant EXHIBIT D PAGE 1 OF 2 FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter. unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus 1-rristi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Patrick D. Vete (Type or Print) Signature of Certifying Person: DEFINITIONS Title: Vice President Date: 04-20-16 a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part- time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies. or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." g. "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. EXHIBIT D PAGE 2 OF 2 Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-50911 Date Filed: 05/05/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. LJA Engineering, Inc. Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E12127 Engineering and Surveying Services 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. X 6 AFFIDAVIT 1 swear, or affirm, under perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. i Rd 1 1 (_AIM ,�I •rll�J' 4hp My Commission Expires November 11,2017 ' Signature of authorized agePof contracting business entity I. rl� J0 I'1 e 5 , this the 5�J day of i 'l y AFFIX Sworn 20 NOTARY to and 1(o STAMP / SEAL ABOVE subscribed before me, by the said 1� tJ . SCO 4'+ , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. r " • V ) " " 1 aQhQ C. Ci a)ireZ AmitJ• /5S -i- C �n Signature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-50913 Date Filed: 05/05/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. LJA Engineering, Inc. Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E12129 Engineering and Surveying Services 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling 1 Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. X 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. i�4 DIANA C RAMIREZ MyNovember Commission11Expires2017 Y s Signature o authorized age of contracting business entity AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE p ' Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said ,� J • SCO 4 ,Ines , this the 5}6 day of 1f14 , ,r 20 t. , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. �f' G1A,Cr 1A►'1Q C. �'>1i ►�Z f►i [.4.f 5'.Signature of officer admstering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx. us Version V1.0.1021 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of July 19, 2015 DATE: TO: July 7, 2016 Margie C. Rose, Interim City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager MarkVV@cctexas.com (361) 826-3082 Valerie H. Gray, P.E., Executive Director of Public Works ValerieG@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: Jeffrey Edmonds, P. E., Director of Capital Programs JeffreyE@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Approval for Amendments to Support Service Contracts Engineering Services Staff Augmentation — Construction Inspection CAPTION: Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute Amendment No. 1 for nine Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation (CISA) contracts totaling $1,846,875 for a total not to exceed amount of $2,291,695 providing augmented Construction Inspection staff within Engineering Services Department. PURPOSE: The purpose of this agenda item is to amend existing CISA contracts to extend the period of performance for construction inspection services. A Request for Proposals (RFP) for these services was published in October 2015 and the selections were finalized in January. Inspectors began work earlier this year under small AE agreements that were staff approved. This action will extend the contracts for inspectors to the projected end of their current construction project assignments. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Engineering Services has historically used a combination of in-house and contract staff resources to accomplish its mission of delivering capital projects to City operating departments. Current workload demands exceed the capabilities of the existing inspector workforce. Inspectors are essential for the successful delivery of construction projects. Construction Inspectors are 1 typically responsible for the following tasks: • Ensure construction contractors are compliant with construction documents including plans and specifications, codes and regulations; • Monitor contractor performance and progress for quality, quantities and timeliness; • Coordinate traffic control plans and changes with local businesses, residents and other agencies; • Coordinate City utilities for outages, connections etc. with Operating Departments and local businesses and residents; • Coordinate with private utilities including AEP, AT&T, Time Warner, etc.; • Review and recommend progress pay applications for contractors, and • Implement and coordinate general inspections, special inspections and final inspections. Currently Engineering Services is managing 39 active City construction projects with a total value of $274 Million. Engineering Services also provides quality assurance inspection for the public infrastructure in private subdivision developments. There are 14 current subdivision projects for which Engineering is providing inspections. The following is a summary of the project workload: • 39 active City construction contracts totaling $274M; ✓ Streets (19 contracts) • 16 Major Street projects totaling $70M • 2 SPMP Overlay & Seal Coat contracts with over 150 Streets totaling $17M • Signals and Sign Multi -task project $1M ✓ Utilities (30 contracts) • 7 Water plant and distribution system projects totaling $121M including one multiple task order contracts • 10 Wastewater plant and collection system projects totaling $8M including four multiple task order contracts ✓ 2 CCIA Projects totaling $48M ✓ 1 Solid Waste Project totaling $4M ✓ 3 Parks & Recreation/Facility Projects totaling $5M • 14 subdivision projects; • 19 City projects in close-out phase totaling $106 Million; • There are an additional 36 city street projects, 41 utility projects, 22 other facility/building projects scheduled to begin construction later this calendar year with an unknown number of private subdivision developments. Engineering Services continues to experience recruiting difficulties concurrent with a significant spike in bidding and construction activity. The Engineering Services currently has 16 full-time inspector positions. Currently 7 of the 16 inspector positions are vacant and the department is actively recruiting. City staff anticipated the increased workload and released an RFP for additional Construction Inspectors that closed in November 2015. The RFP was structured as a best value procurement where hourly rates and the individual inspectors' qualifications were equally weighted. Selections were announced in January 2016 and inspectors began working under small AE agreements in February. The contracting approach allows the department the ability to respond to a rapidly increasing workload 2 and can easily adjust downward as projects are concluded. This current RFP process replaced the previous processes where these services were treated as a professional procurement governed under the Engineering Practice Act. Previously, firms were either hired based on firm qualifications for construction management or inspection services were sole sourced to the design engineering firm for a negotiated fee. This new, competitively priced, RFP process has achieved significant savings, increased the level of inspector expertise and allowed the City to provide a standard management approach to construction oversight across the City's entire construction portfolio. This Agenda item authorizes extension of the existing small AE staff augmentation contracts which will be expiring soon. The initial contracts were administratively authorized to expedite the onboarding process. The contracts provide hourly rates for each inspector inclusive of vehicle and equipment with not -to -exceed amounts calculated to extend their service to the projected end of the current inspector assignments. The following is a list of firms currently providing construction inspection staff augmentation services: Consultant Inspector Original Contract Contract Amendment (THIS ITEM) Not to Exceed Amount Duration AGCM Albert Mendoza $49,500 $227,550 $277,050 21 months AGCM Dan Parker $49,500 $190,620 $240,120 15 months ACGM George De La Cerda $49,400 $151,060 $200,460 18 months AGCM Manuel Hernandez $49,600 $200,760 $250,360 18 months AGCM Marcus Garcia $49,500 $315,425 $364,925 21 months AGCM William Hammac $49,600 $196,320 $245,920 18 months LAN David Lopez $48,720 $132,240 $180,960 18 months LNV Jose De Leon $49,500 $137,700 $187,200 12 months Maverick Joe Sandoval $49,500 $295,200 $344,700 21 months Total $444,820 $1,846,875 $2,291,695 The augmented staff Construction Inspector work assignments and responsibilities are comparable to City Employee requirements for maintaining regular business work hours and completion of required responsibilities. For example, all inspectors must enter project data on City forms and enter daily reports into the Engineering project management database. The CISA contracts aggregate amount of approximately $2.3 Million represents less than 1% of the $282 Million value in active construction projects. The CISA rates are inclusive of vehicle, computer, phone, personal safety equipment and miscellaneous expenses. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize execution of the Amendments to the Professional Services Agreements. 2. Do not authorize Amendments to the Professional Services Agreements. (Not Recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Staff will continue to evaluate and amend current recruiting strategies to successfully fill Department vacancies. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: 3 This conforms to city policy for procurement of construction support and inspection services. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Engineering Services FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Operating ❑ Revenue X Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Years 2015-2016 Current Year 2016-2017 TOTALS Line Item Budget $1,846,875 $1,846,875 Encumbered/Expended Amount This item $1,846,875 $1,846,875 Future Anticipated Expenditures BALANCE $0.00 $0.00 Fund(s): Street, Utility, and Parks & Recreation CIP Comments: CISA's will be charged to various projects in accordance with hours worked in support of each project. RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approval of the CISA contracts to maintain the current level of inspector support. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Presentation Location Map Amendment No. 1 (9) Form 1295 (4) 4 Staff Augmentation Construction Inspection Corpus Chr sti Engineering Council Presentation July 12, 2016 Engineering Services Staffing Contracts Project Management • Planning & design phase focus • Professional engineering contracts (AE) • Negotiated rates based on individual qualifications Construction Management r: Construction oversight services Procured with Request for Proposal (RFP) • Best value procurement 1. L Based on individual resumes and proposed rate Rates include vehicle, computer, telecom resources Background �hrsti Engineering • Engineering Services is experiencing a significant spike in construction activity. • Currently 39 City projects and 14 subdivisions under construction. • Engineering Services has 16 City inspector positions budgeted with 7 vacancies. • That represents 53 projects with 9 FTE inspectors Background Corpus Chr sti Engineering • Engineering anticipated the spike in inspector demands • A request for proposals (RFP) was released in October 2015 • RFP was a "best value" procurement considering individual inspector qualifications and hourly rates • 9 inspectors were selected and began working under small AE agreements earlier this year • The small AE agreements are approaching contract ceilings • The amendments will extend the inspectors' service periods to the conclusion of current assignments Benefits �hrsti Engineering • Contracts allow rapid response to workload changes • Provides experienced inspectors ready to "hit the ground running" • Best value procurement approach results in cost savings Recommendation �hrsti Engineering • Authorize execution of contract amendments for Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation services. Duration Contract Summary �hrsti Engineering Consultant Original Contract Contract Amendment (THIS ITEM) Not to Exceed Amount AGCM AGCM $49,500 $49,500 $227,550 $190,620 $277,050 $240,120 21 months 15 months AGCM LAN LNV Maverick TOTAL $49,400 $49,600 $49,500 $49,600 $48,720 $49,500 $49,500 $151,060 $200,760 $315,425 $196,320 $132,240 $137,700 $295,200 $200,460 $250,360 $364,925 $245,920 $180,960 $187,200 $344,700 $444,820 $1,846,875 $2,291,695 18 months 18 months 21 months 18 months 18 months 12 months 21 months 7 Ed Odom Morgan Farm Area 77 Rancho Chico Del Sol -Lorna Linda ue es P. Taft Doyle I'c.rLI rud Ingleside Tradewinds. I II -.c I'p1., } Christi (280 t• Ingleside on the Bay Staff Augmentation - Construction Inspection (Citywide) Chapman Ranch 0 • VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE tikma Falma n- Acr Ar Swr Project Number: E16237 Staff Augmentation - Construction Inspection CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. AGICM Inc. Corpus Christi, TX United States Certificate Number: 2016-69109 Date Filed: 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 06/10/2016 Date Acknowledged: 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E16247 Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. X 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. lisgsi.Z1,11'.A., LINDA FAY PANitA .c.- Notary P4 State of Texas rU,.;;,ts April 1 S, 2011 _ ICt AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said Sigfilture of authorized agent of contracting business entity 94 rt this the f 2 ' day of 5, , 20 /6 , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. (1" ignature of officer administering oat Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-68273 Date Filed: 06/09/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. Houston, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E16247 Engineering services 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary Daly, Leo Washington, DC United States X Daly, Grega Washington, DC United States X Petersen, Dennis Houston, TX United States X Cohen, Arnold Austin, TX United States X Vajdani, Sima Los Angeles, CA United States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. I 1 ` lW% COURTNEY CASTELLANOS +�° ";,Notary Publlc, State of Texas `sMr ,z.? Comm. Expires 02-25-2020 • "•'or;„? ,0% Notary ID 130554862 �„w,, y 3 nature of authorized agent of contracting business entity AFFIX Swor NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE lirl to and subscribed before me, by the said PM ()Ir'i'7 , this the day of d u n .. , _zg .. 20 `t` , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. ice 1 iii f f ir- ras--feff Kafwel2thfic, Signature of officer a• inistering oath Poole, name of officer adminis ring oath Title of officer admIni: tering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-66631 Date Filed: 06/07/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. LNV, Inc. Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi, Texas 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E16247 - Constr. Inspection Professional engineering, architectural, and/or surveying services. 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary Leyendecker, Dan Corpus Christi , TX United States X Naiser, Derek San Antonio, TX United States X Viera, Robert Corpus Christi, TX United States X Trejo, Eric Corpus Christi, TX United States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. ❑ 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, der penalty of perjury, t the above disclosure is true and correct. o�•,► `�''''' TANYA LACHELLE SWAILS 3i4, ••.Notary Public, State of Texas' a.:./� Comm. Expires 03-30-2020 i / l // ��`'`� '/'�of``� Nofary ID 11712738 p��mua�. Signature of authorized gent of cor(tracting business entity AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE Sw.• n o and subscribed before me, by the said l(�& ie. i4. 1,4_1(41 , this the 7i't day of( Vn e- 2O4I , to certify which, wit, ss my hand and seal of office. t. J \ 4 f. 40; ././"-) ken g- f1-7 /5 , ' ignature/of, a�� i Bring oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oat rms prbvidey Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 If there are Interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-66499 Date Filed: 06/07/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Maverick Engineering, Inc. Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E16247 Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling 1 Intermediary 5 Check only If there Is NO Interested Party. X 6 AFFIDAV AFFIX NOTARY Sworn to 20 J (a T LAM& ,1k SUSAN SNOW -•\ My Commission Expires ,,!; April 28, 2015 I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure Is true and correct. ' OAP 1 STAMP / SEAL ABOVE and subscribed before me, by the said , to certify which, witness my hand Signature of authorizt._agent f contracting business entity -{ eJ �t , this the / A day of :rid tie, , and seal of office. 6 usamSn0vt) tlo Pu_bitG K r , ,c jJe1( Signature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of office/administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.1021 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AMENDMENT NO. 1 CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The City of Corpus Christi, Texas, hereinafter called "CITY," and AGCM, Inc. hereinafter called "CONSULTANT," agree to the following amendment to the Contract for Professional Services for Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation —Albert Mendoza (Project No. E16247) as authorized and administratively amended by: Original Contract February 29, 2016 Administrative Approval $49,500.00 IN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT, SECTION 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES, shall be modified as shown in Exhibit "A". IN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT, SECTION 4. FEES, shall be modified for an additional fee not to exceed $227,550.00 (in figures) Two Hundred Twenty Seven Thousand Five Hundred Fifty Dollars and Zero Cents (in words) for a total restated fee not to exceed $277,050.00 (in figures) Two Hundred Seventy Seven Thousand Fifty Dollars and Zero Cents (in words). All other terms and conditions of the February 29, 2016 contract between the "CITY" and "CONSULTANT" and of any amendments to that contract which are not specifically addressed herein shall remain in full force and effect. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AGCM, INC. J. H. Edmonds, P.E. Director of Engineering Services APPROVED AS TO FORM Legal Department Date APPROVED AS TO FUNDING Office of Mgmt and Budget Date ATTEST City Secretary I � 41Zfil6 V _ Pr :dont /" CT A Na"tl et_ 1101 Ocean Drive �.to. Corpus Christi, TX 78404 (361) 882-0469 Office (361) 884-9358 Fax Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation — Albert Mendoza, E16247 AGCM Engineering, Amendment No. 1 Fund Name Accounting Unit Account No. Activity No. Account Category Amount STORMWATER 3494-043 550910 E12093013494EXP 50910 $56,887.00 STREETS 3549-051 550910 E12093013549EXP 50910 $56,888.00 WATER 4094-041 550910 E12093014094EXP 50910 $56,887.00 WW 4253-042 550910 E12093014253EXP 50910 $56,888.00 Total $227,550.00 Encumbrance No. AMD. NO. 1 Page 2 of 2 AG June 10, 2016 CM INC. City of Corpus Christi Attn. Jeff Edmonds, P.E. Dept. of Engineering Services / Capital Programs P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 CORPUS CHRISTI 1101 Ocean Drive (78404) PO Box 2682 Corpus Christi, TX 78403 Ofc 3611882-0469 Fax 3611884-9358 www.agcm.com SUBJECT: PROPOSED AMENDMENT 1 FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION STAFF AUGMENTATION ALBERT MENDOZA - RFP NO. 2015-07 Dear Jeff: We are excited to have the potential to continue our successful relationship with the City and will continue supporting the City to the standards you are accustomed to. AG1CM proposes to continue provide Albert Mendoza on a full-time basis through December 31, 2017 at the corresponding rates and Not to Exceed (NTE) amounts for Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation according to the terms disclosed in RFP No. 2015-07: Original Contract Amendment 1 $75.00 / HR $75.00 / HR NTE - $49,500 NTE - $227,550 Total NTE - $277,050 Of the Original Contract amount of $49,500, $28,050 has been billed through May 31, 2016 and $21,450 remains. It is our understanding that his time will be exclusive to the E12093 Ocean Dr. project, or as otherwise directed by the City. AG1CM will provide these services to the level of professionalism you have previously experienced with our personnel. Thank you again for this opportunity and we look forward to continuing the success of City of Corpus Christi. Sincerely, N% an ' inne , PE, CCM ice Preside — South Texas Region %1►"11`1C1 Cormin elien Management Aaeciaiim Ed America EXHIBIT A Page 1 of 1 X LUX Z X I- H. O ✓ O Z W Z as O m 5 �>> a E = a Invoice Date: CD t.) CD a E 0 0 w co V c '0 N d 0 O . •5 0 a) c> 0 — c 72) O• • E >> Q E O o 0 N Z Q z E 0 0 Basic Services: \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ \ 0 0 O O \ 0 O 0'9 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O 0'9 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O O O O O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Preliminary Phase Design Phase co co L OQ CD LT) Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Additional Services: Warranty Phase 0 & M Manuals O 0 Subtotal Additional Services Basic Services Fees Additional Services Fees Total of Fees Exhibit "B" Page 1 of 1 City of Corpus Chnsti SUPPLIER NUMBER TO BE ASSIGNED BY CITY PURCHASING DIVISION CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definitions. COMPANY NAME: P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: FIRM IS: z ,z //QI Data K 7Dr- 1. Corporation 4. Association CITY: Partnership Other 3. Sole Owner ZIP: 71Ff/Vg 111 DISCLOSURE gUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Job Title and City Department (if known) /Slone 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Title Nene 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Board, Commission or Committee Norte 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Consultant None EXHIBIT C Page I of 2 FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi. Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: -PC; A et /e - Sow T}pe or Pond Signature of Certifying Person: Title: ./444{4, Date: 6/zi ft'i DEFINITIONS a. "Board member.'" A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. h. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial. and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." g. "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. EXHIBIT C Page 2 of 2 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AMENDMENT NO. 1 CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The City of Corpus Christi, Texas, hereinafter called "CITY," and AGCM, Inc. hereinafter called "CONSULTANT," agree to the following amendment to the Contract for Professional Services for Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation — Dan Parker (Project No. E16247) as authorized and administratively amended by: Original Contract March 25, 2016 Administrative Approval $49,500.00 IN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT, SECTION 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES, shall be modified as shown in Exhibit "A". IN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT, SECTION 4. FEES, shall be modified for an additional fee not to exceed $190,620.00 (in figures) One Hundred Ninety Thousand Six Hundred Twenty Dollars and Zero Cents (in words) for a total restated fee not to exceed $240,120.00 (in figures) Two Hundred Forty Thousand One Hundred Dollars and Zero Cents (in words). All other terms and conditions of the March 25, 2016 contract between the "CITY" and "CONSULTANT" and of any amendments to that contract which are not specifically addressed herein shall remain in full force and effect. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AGCM, INC. J. H. Edmonds, P.E. Director of Engineering Services APPROVED AS TO FORM Legal Department Date APPROVED AS TO FUNDING Office of Mgmt and Budget Date ATTEST City Secretary Nathan Swinney, CPE Vice President 1101 Ocean Drive Corpus Christi, TX 78404 (361) 882-0469 Office (361) 884-9358 Fax Date Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation — Dan Parker, E16247 AGCM Engineering, Amendment No. 1 Fund Name Accounting Unit Account No. Activity No. Account Category Amount 2016 Facility CIP 3164-191 550910 E14062013164EXP 50910 $190,920.00 Total $190,620.00 Encumbrance No. AMD. NO. 1 Page 2 of 2 AG June 10, 2016 CM INC. City of Corpus Christi Attn. Jeff Edmonds, P.E. Dept. of Engineering Services / Capital Programs P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 CORPUS CHRISTI 1101 Ocean Drive (78404) PO Box 2682 Corpus Christi, TX 78403 Ofc 3611882-0469 Fax 3611884-9358 www.agcm.com SUBJECT: PROPOSED AMENDMENT 1 FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION STAFF AUGMENTATION DAN PARKER - RFP NO. 2015-07 Dear Jeff: We are excited to have the potential to continue our successful relationship with the City and will continue supporting the City to the standards you are accustomed to. AG1CM proposes to continue provide Dan Parker on a full-time basis through August 30, 2017 at the corresponding rates and Not to Exceed (NTE) amounts for Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation according to the terms disclosed in RFP No. 2015-07: Original Contract Amendment 1 $90 / HR $90 / HR NTE - $49,500 NTE - $190,620 Total NTE - $240,120 Of the Original Contract amount $49,500, $2,520 has been billed through May 31, 2016 and $46,980 remains. It is our understanding that his time will be divided between projects as directed by the City. AG1CM will provide these services to the level of professionalism you have previously experienced with our personnel. Thank you again for this opportunity and we look forward to continuing the success of City of Corpus Christi. Sincerely, N% an ' inne , PE, CCM ice Preside — South Texas Region %1►"11`1C1 Cormin elien Management Aaeciaiim Ed America Exhibit A Page 1 of 1 Basic Services: Preliminary Phase Design Phase Bid Phase Report Phase Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Additional Services: Permitting Warranty Phase Inspection Platting Survey Reporting O & M Manuals SCADA Subtotal Additional Services Summary of Fees Basic Services Fees Additional Services Fees Total of Fees 71 M aux c0 7' CD a — rt o - h 03 PROJECT NAME Project No. EXXXXX Invoice No. 12345 Invoice Date: Total Amount Previous Total Percent Contract Amd No. 1 Amd No. 2 Contract Invoiced Invoice Invoice Complete $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0% 0 0 0 0 $0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 0% TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0% v+ri�r City of Corpus Christi SUPPLIER NUMBER TO BE ASSIGNED BY CITY PURCHASING DIVISION CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definitions. COMPANY NAME: P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 4. Association CITY: ZIP: 2. Partnership 5. Other 3. Sole Owner ❑ DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each ` employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Board, Commission or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Consultant EXHIBIT C Page 1 of 2 FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Title: (Type or Print) Signature of Certifying Person: Date: DEFINITIONS a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." g - "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. EXHIBIT C Page 2 of 2 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AMENDMENT NO. 1 CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The City of Corpus Christi, Texas, hereinafter called "CITY," and AGCM, Inc. hereinafter called "CONSULTANT," agree to the following amendment to the Contract for Professional Services for Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation — George De La Cerda (Project No. E16247) as authorized and administratively amended by: Original Contract February 29, 2016 Administrative Approval $49,400.00 IN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT, SECTION 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES, shall be modified as shown in Exhibit "A". IN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT, SECTION 4. FEES, shall be modified for an additional fee not to exceed $151,060.00 (in figures) One Hundred Fifty One Thousand Sixty Dollars and Zero Cents (in words) for a total restated fee not to exceed $200,460.00 (in figures) Two Hundred Thousand Four Hundred Sixty Dollars and Zero Cents (in words). All other terms and conditions of the February 29, 2016 contract between the "CITY" and "CONSULTANT" and of any amendments to that contract which are not specifically addressed herein shall remain in full force and effect. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AGCM, INC. J. H. Edmonds, P.E. Director of Engineering Services APPROVED AS TO FORM Legal Department Date APPROVED AS TO FUNDING Office of Mgmt and Budget Date ATTEST City Secretary Nathan Swinney, CPE Vice President 1101 Ocean Drive Corpus Christi, TX 78404 (361) 882-0469 Office (361) 884-9358 Fax Date Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation — George De La Cerda, E16247 AGCM Engineering, Amendment No. 1 Fund Name Accounting Unit Account No. Activity No. Account Category Amount Public Facilities 3162-191 550910 E12120013162EXP 50910 $56,000.00 Parks Bond 2012 3293-141 550910 E14005013293EXP 50910 $31,687.00 Parks Bond 2012 3293-141 550910 E14005013293EXP 50910 $31,687.00 Parks Bond 2012 3293-141 550910 E14005013293EXP 50910 $31,686.00 Total $151,060.00 Encumbrance No. AMD. NO. 1 Page 2of2 AG June 10, 2016 CM INC. City of Corpus Christi Attn. Jeff Edmonds, P.E. Dept. of Engineering Services / Capital Programs P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 CORPUS CHRISTI 1101 Ocean Drive (78404) PO Box 2682 Corpus Christi, TX 78403 Ofc 3611882-0469 Fax 3611884-9358 www.agcm.com SUBJECT: PROPOSED AMENDMENT 1 FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION STAFF AUGMENTATION GEORGE DE LA CERDA - RFP NO. 2015-07 Dear Jeff: We are excited to have the potential to continue our successful relationship with the City and will continue supporting the City to the standards you are accustomed to. AG1CM proposes to continue provide George De La Cerda on a full-time basis through August 30, 2017 at the corresponding rates and Not to Exceed (NTE) amounts for Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation according to the terms disclosed in RFP No. 2015-07: Original Contract Amendment 1 $65 / HR $65 / HR NTE - $49,400 NTE - $151,060 Total NTE - $200,460 Of the Original Contract amount of $49,400, $28,860 has been billed through May 31, 2016 and $20,540 remains. It is our understanding that his time will be divided between projects as directed by the City. AG1CM will provide these services to the level of professionalism you have previously experienced with our personnel. Thank you again for this opportunity and we look forward to continuing the success of City of Corpus Christi. Sincerely, N% an ' inne , PE, CCM ice Preside — South Texas Region %1►"11`1C1 Cormin elien Management Aaeciaiim Ed America Exhibit A Page 1 of 1 X LUX Z X I- H. O ✓ O Z W Z as O m 5 �>> a E = a Invoice Date: CD t.) CD a E 0 0 w co V c '0 N d 0 O . •5 0 a) c> 0 — c 72) O• • E >> Q E O o 0 N Z Q z E 0 0 Basic Services: \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ \ 0 0 O O \ 0 O 0'9 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O 0'9 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O O O O O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Preliminary Phase Design Phase co co L OQ CD LT) Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Additional Services: Warranty Phase 0 & M Manuals O 0 Subtotal Additional Services Basic Services Fees Additional Services Fees Total of Fees Exhibit "B" Page 1 of 1 v+ri�r City of Corpus Christi SUPPLIER NUMBER TO BE ASSIGNED BY CITY PURCHASING DIVISION CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definitions. COMPANY NAME: P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 4. Association CITY: ZIP: 2. Partnership 5. Other 3. Sole Owner ❑ DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each ` employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Board, Commission or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Consultant EXHIBIT C Page 1 of 2 FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Title: (Type or Print) Signature of Certifying Person: Date: DEFINITIONS a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." g - "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. EXHIBIT C Page 2 of 2 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AMENDMENT NO. 1 CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The City of Corpus Christi, Texas, hereinafter called "CITY," and AGCM, Inc. hereinafter called "CONSULTANT," agree to the following amendment to the Contract for Professional Services for Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation — Manuel Hernandez (Project No. E16247) as authorized and administratively amended by: Original Contract February 29, 2016 Administrative Approval $49,500.00 IN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT, SECTION 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES, shall be modified as shown in Exhibit "A". IN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT, SECTION 4. FEES, shall be modified for an additional fee not to exceed $200,760.00 (in figures) Two Hundred Thousand Seven Hundred Sixty Dollars and Zero Cents (in words) for a total restated fee not to exceed $250,360.00 (in figures) Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Three Hundred Sixty Dollars and Zero Cents (in words). All other terms and conditions of the February 29, 2016 contract between the "CITY" and "CONSULTANT" and of any amendments to that contract which are not specifically addressed herein shall remain in full force and effect. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AGCM, INC. J. H. Edmonds, P.E. Director of Engineering Services APPROVED AS TO FORM Legal Department Date APPROVED AS TO FUNDING Office of Mgmt and Budget Date ATTEST City Secretary Nathan Swinney, CPE Vice President 1101 Ocean Drive Corpus Christi, TX 78404 (361) 882-0469 Office (361) 884-9358 Fax Date Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation — Manuel Hernandez, E16247 AGCM Engineering, Amendment No. 1 Fund Name Accounting Unit Account No. Activity No. Account Category Amount Streets Bd 2014 3551-051 550910 E13095013551 EXP 50910 $100,380.00 SW Bond 2012 3498-043 550910 E12090019498EXP 50910 $25,095.00 Streets Bd 2012 3549-051 550910 E12090013549EXP 50910 $25,095.00 Water Bond 2012 4094-041 550910 E12090014094EXP 50910 $25,095.00 WW Bond 2012 4253-042 550910 E12090014253EXP 50910 $25,095.00 Total $200,760.00 Encumbrance No. AMD. NO.1 Page 2 of 2 AG June 10, 2016 CM INC. City of Corpus Christi Attn. Jeff Edmonds, P.E. Dept. of Engineering Services / Capital Programs P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 CORPUS CHRISTI 1101 Ocean Drive (78404) PO Box 2682 Corpus Christi, TX 78403 Ofc 3611882-0469 Fax 3611884-9358 www.agcm.com SUBJECT: PROPOSED AMENDMENT 1 FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION STAFF AUGMENTATION MANUEL HERNANDEZ - RFP NO. 2015-07 Dear Jeff: We are excited to have the potential to continue our successful relationship with the City and will continue supporting the City to the standards you are accustomed to. AG1CM proposes to continue provide Manuel Hernandez on a full-time basis through June 30, 2017 at the corresponding rates and Not to Exceed (NTE) amounts for Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation according to the terms disclosed in RFP No. 2015-07: Original Contract Amendment 1 $80 / HR $80 / HR NTE - $49,600 NTE - $200,760 Total NTE - $250,360 Of the Original Contract amount of $49,600, $41,560 has been billed through May 31, 2016 and $8,040 remains. It is our understanding that his time will be divided between projects E12090 Navigation Blvd. and E13095 Southern Minerals Rd., or as otherwise directed by the City. AG1CM will provide these services to the level of professionalism you have previously experienced with our personnel. Thank you again for this opportunity and we look forward to continuing the success of City of Corpus Christi. Sincerely, N% an ' inne , PE, CCM ice Preside — South Texas Region %1►"11`1C1 Cormin elien Management Aaeciaiim Ed America EXHIBIT A PAGE 1 OF 1 X LUX Z X I- H. O ✓ O Z W Z as O m 5 �>> a E = a Invoice Date: CD t.) CD a E 0 0 w co V c '0 N d 0 O . •5 0 a) c> 0 — c 72) O• • E >> Q E O o 0 N Z Q z E 0 0 Basic Services: \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ \ 0 0 O O \ 0 O 0'9 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O 0'9 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O O O O O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Preliminary Phase Design Phase co co L OQ CD LT) Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Additional Services: Warranty Phase 0 & M Manuals O 0 Subtotal Additional Services Basic Services Fees Additional Services Fees Total of Fees Exhibit "B" Page 1 of 1 v+ri�r City of Corpus Christi SUPPLIER NUMBER TO BE ASSIGNED BY CITY PURCHASING DIVISION CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definitions. COMPANY NAME: P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 4. Association CITY: ZIP: 2. Partnership 5. Other 3. Sole Owner ❑ DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each ` employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Board, Commission or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Consultant EXHIBIT C Page 1 of 2 FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Title: (Type or Print) Signature of Certifying Person: Date: DEFINITIONS a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." g - "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. EXHIBIT C Page 2 of 2 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AMENDMENT NO. 1 CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The City of Corpus Christi, Texas, hereinafter called "CITY," and AGCM, Inc. hereinafter called "CONSULTANT," agree to the following amendment to the Contract for Professional Services for Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation — Marcus Garcia (Project No. E16247) as authorized and administratively amended by: Original Contract February 29, 2016 Administrative Approval $49,500.00 IN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT, SECTION 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES, shall be modified as shown in Exhibit "A". IN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT, SECTION 4. FEES, shall be modified for an additional fee not to exceed $315,425.00 (in figures) Three Hundred Fifteen Thousand Four Hundred Twenty Five Dollars and Zero Cents (in words) for a total restated fee not to exceed $364,925.00 (in figures) Three Hundred Sixty Four Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty Five Dollars and Zero Cents (in words). All other terms and conditions of the February 29, 2016 contract between the "CITY" and "CONSULTANT" and of any amendments to that contract which are not specifically addressed herein shall remain in full force and effect. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AGCM, INC. J. H. Edmonds, P.E. Director of Engineering Services APPROVED AS TO FORM Legal Department Date APPROVED AS TO FUNDING Office of Mgmt and Budget Date ATTEST City Secretary Nathan Swinney, CPE Vice President 1101 Ocean Drive Corpus Christi, TX 78404 (361) 882-0469 Office (361) 884-9358 Fax Date Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation — Marcus Garcia, E16247 AGCM Engineering, Amendment No. 1 Fund Name Accounting Unit Account No. Activity No. Account Category Amount Water Rev Bond 4091-041 550910 E14043014091EXP 90910 $78,856.00 Water Rev Bond 4091-041 550910 180198014091 EXP 90910 $78,856.00 Water Rev Bond 4091-041 550910 E10172014091EXP 90910 $78,856.00 Water Rev Bond 4091-041 550910 E13109014091EXP 90910 $78,857.00 Total $315,425.00 Encumbrance No. AMD. NO. 1 Page 2 of 2 AG June 17, 2016 CM INC. City of Corpus Christi Attn. Jeff Edmonds, P.E. Dept. of Engineering Services / Capital Programs P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 CORPUS CHRISTI 1101 Ocean Drive (78404) PO Box 2682 Corpus Christi, TX 78403 Ofc 3611882-0469 Fax 3611884-9358 www.agcm.com SUBJECT: PROPOSED AMENDMENT 1 FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION STAFF AUGMENTATION MARCUS GARCIA — RFP NO. 2015-07 Dear Jeff: We are excited to have the potential to continue our successful relationship with the City and will continue supporting the City to the standards you are accustomed to. AG1CM proposes to continue provide Marcus Garcia on a full-time basis through August 30, 2017 at the corresponding rates and Not to Exceed (NTE) amounts for Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation according to the terms disclosed in RFP No. 2015-07: Original Contract NTE - $49,500 CHOKE CANYON DAM SPILLWAY Amendment 1 $110 /HR NTE - $156,312 Mileage Reimbursement Est'd - $10,000 Subtotal NTE - $166,312 WATER DEPARTMENT Amendment 1 $95 / HR NTE - $149,113 Subtotal NTE - $149,113 Total Amendment 1 NTE - $315,425 GRAND TOTAL NTE - $364,925 Of the Original Contract amount of $49,500, $66,173.68 has been billed through May 31, 2016 and -$16,673.68 remains. EXHIBIT A PAGE 1 OF 2 Comiructen Management Aaotiaian of America It is our understanding that his time will be divided between the E14043 Choke Canyon Dam Spillway project and the Water Department. AG1CM will provide these services to the level of professionalism you have previously experienced with our personnel. Thank you again for this opportunity and we look forward to continuing the success of City of Corpus Christi. Sincerely, Nan inne , PE, CCM ice Preside — South Texas Region CamIndion Almagmanlitswialinin of America EXHIBIT A PAGE 2 OF 2 X LUX Z X I- H. O ✓ O Z W Z as O m 5 �>> a E = a Invoice Date: CD t.) CD a E 0 0 w co V c '0 N d 0 O . •5 0 a) c> 0 — c 72) O• • E >> Q E O o 0 N Z Q z E 0 0 Basic Services: \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ \ 0 0 O O \ 0 O 0'9 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O 0'9 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O O O O O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Preliminary Phase Design Phase co co L OQ CD LT) Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Additional Services: Warranty Phase 0 & M Manuals O 0 Subtotal Additional Services Basic Services Fees Additional Services Fees Total of Fees Exhibit "B" Page 1 of 1 v+ri�r City of Corpus Christi SUPPLIER NUMBER TO BE ASSIGNED BY CITY PURCHASING DIVISION CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definitions. COMPANY NAME: P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 4. Association CITY: ZIP: 2. Partnership 5. Other 3. Sole Owner ❑ DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each ` employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Board, Commission or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Consultant EXHIBIT C Page 1 of 2 FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Title: (Type or Print) Signature of Certifying Person: Date: DEFINITIONS a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." g - "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. EXHIBIT C Page 2 of 2 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AMENDMENT NO. 1 CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The City of Corpus Christi, Texas, hereinafter called "CITY," and AGCM, Inc. hereinafter called "CONSULTANT," agree to the following amendment to the Contract for Professional Services for Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation- William Hammac (Project No. E16247) as authorized and administratively amended by: Original Contract February 29, 2016 Administrative Approval $49,600.00 IN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT, SECTION 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES, shall be modified as shown in Exhibit "A". IN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT, SECTION 4. FEES, shall be modified for an additional fee not to exceed $196,320.00 (in figures) One Hundred Ninety Six Thousand Three Hundred Twenty Dollars and Zero Cents (in words) for a total restated fee not to exceed $245,920.00 (in figures) Two Hundred Forty Five Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty Dollars and Zero Cents (in words). All other terms and conditions of the February 29, 2016 contract between the "CITY" and "CONSULTANT" and of any amendments to that contract which are not specifically addressed herein shall remain in full force and effect. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AGCM, INC. J. H. Edmonds, P.E. Director of Engineering Services APPROVED AS TO FORM Legal Department Date APPROVED AS TO FUNDING Office of Mgmt and Budget Date ATTEST City Secretary Nathan Swinney, CPE Vice President 1101 Ocean Drive Corpus Christi, TX 78404 (361) 882-0469 Office (361) 884-9358 Fax Date Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation — William Hammac, E16247 AGCM Engineering, Amendment No. 1 Fund Name Accounting Unit Account No. Activity No. Account Category Amount Water 2015 4097-041 550910 E12137014097EXP 50910 $24,540.00 Storm Water 2015 4531-042 550910 E12137014531 EXP 50910 $24,540.00 Streets Bd 2014 3551-051 550910 E13100013551EXP 50910 $49,080.00 StormWater RvBd 3495-043 550910 E12099013495EXP 50910 $24,540.00 Streets 2012 3549-051 550910 E12099013549EXP 50910 $24,540.00 Water RvBd 4091-041 550910 E12099014091EXP 50910 $24,540.00 Wastewater RvBd 4249-042 550910 E12099014249EXP 50910 $24,540.00 Total $196,320.00 Encumbrance No. AG June 10, 2016 CM INC. City of Corpus Christi Attn. Jeff Edmonds, P.E. Dept. of Engineering Services / Capital Programs P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 CORPUS CHRISTI 1101 Ocean Drive (78404) PO Box 2682 Corpus Christi, TX 78403 Ofc 3611882-0469 Fax 3611884-9358 www.agcm.com SUBJECT: PROPOSED AMENDMENT 1 FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION STAFF AUGMENTATION WILLIAM HAMMAC - RFP NO. 2015-07 Dear Jeff: We are excited to have the potential to continue our successful relationship with the City and will continue supporting the City to the standards you are accustomed to. AG1CM proposes to continue provide William Hammac on a full-time basis through August 30, 2017 at the corresponding rates and Not to Exceed (NTE) amounts for Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation according to the terms disclosed in RFP No. 2015-07: Original Contract Amendment 1 $80 / HR $80 / HR NTE - $49,600 NTE - $196,320 Total NTE - $245,920 Of the Original Contract amount of $49,600, $34,720 has been billed through May 31, 2016 and $14,880 remains. It is our understanding that his time will be divided between projects as directed by the City. AG1CM will provide these services to the level of professionalism you have previously experienced with our personnel. Thank you again for this opportunity and we look forward to continuing the success of City of Corpus Christi. Sincerely, N% an ' inne , PE, CCM ice Preside — South Texas Region %1►"11`1C1 Cormin elien Management Aaeciaiim Ed America EXHIBIT A PAGE 1 OF 1 X LUX Z X I- H. O ✓ O Z W Z as O m 5 �>> a E = a Invoice Date: CD t.) CD a E 0 0 w co V c '0 N d 0 O . •5 0 a) c> 0 — c 72) O• • E >> Q E O o 0 N Z Q z E 0 0 Basic Services: \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ \ 0 0 O O \ 0 O 0'9 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O 0'9 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O O O O O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Preliminary Phase Design Phase co co L OQ CD LT) Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Additional Services: Warranty Phase 0 & M Manuals O 0 Subtotal Additional Services Basic Services Fees Additional Services Fees Total of Fees Exhibit "B" Page 1 of 1 v+ri�r City of Corpus Christi SUPPLIER NUMBER TO BE ASSIGNED BY CITY PURCHASING DIVISION CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definitions. COMPANY NAME: P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 4. Association CITY: ZIP: 2. Partnership 5. Other 3. Sole Owner ❑ DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each ` employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Board, Commission or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Consultant EXHIBIT C Page 1 of 2 FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Title: (Type or Print) Signature of Certifying Person: Date: DEFINITIONS a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." g - "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. EXHIBIT C Page 2 of 2 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AMENDMENT NO. 1 CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The City of Corpus Christi, Texas, hereinafter called "CITY," and Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc.. hereinafter called "CONSULTANT," agree to the following amendment to the Contract for Professional Services for Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation — David Lopez (Project No. E16247) as authorized and administratively amended by: Original Contract April 26, 2016 Administrative Approval $48,720.00 IN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT, SECTION 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES, shall be modified as shown in Exhibit "A". IN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT, SECTION 4. FEES, shall be modified for an additional fee not to exceed $132,240.00 (in figures) One Hundred Thirty Two Thousand Two Hundred Forty Dollars and Zero Cents (in words) for a total restated fee not to exceed $180,960.00 (in figures) One Hundred Eighty Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty Dollars and Zero Cents (in words). All other terms and conditions of the April 26, 2016 contract between the "CITY" and "CONSULTANT" and of any amendments to that contract which are not specifically addressed herein shall remain in full force and effect. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI LOCKWOOD, ANDREWS & NEWNAM, INC J. H. Edmonds, P.E. Director of Engineering Services APPROVED AS TO FORM Legal Department Date APPROVED AS TO FUNDING Office of Mgmt and Budget Date ATTEST City Secretary Scott M. Harris, P.E. Date Regional Manger 500 N. Shoreline Blvd., Suite 905 Corpus Christi, TX 78401 (361) 882-2257 Office smharris@lan-inc.com Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation — David Lopez, E16247 LAN, Amendment No. 1, $132,240.00 Not to Exceed $180,960.00 Fund Name Accounting Unit Account No. Activity No. Account Category Amount StormWater Bd 12 3496-043 550910 E11116013496EXP 50910 $44,080.00 Water Bd 2012 4091-041 550910 E11116014091EXP 50910 $44,080.00 Wastewater Bd 12 4251-042 550910 E11116014251EXP 50910 $44,080.00 Total $132,240.00 Encumbrance No. AMD. NO. 1 Page 2 of 2 June 8, 2016 Mr. Jeff H. Edmonds, P.E. Director of Engineering Services City of Corpus Christi 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 min Veloal Andrews , Inc. A LEO A DALY COMPANY Reference: Amendment 1 to Construction inspection Staff Augmentation (David Lopez) (Project No. E16247) Dear Mr. Edmonds: At your request, Lockwood Andrews & Newnam, Inc. (LAN) is providing you with this proposal for amending the contract between LAN and the City of Corpus Christi for David Lopez, a full-time employee of LAN, to augment existing City of Corpus Christi staff to provide construction inspection services for the City's Construction Services Department. The scope of services, with which he will continue to perform, is in Attachment A. The original contract is Attachment B. David will continue to perform these services at a rate of $87.00/hour for an additional 38 weeks; a total of 52 weeks (1 -year total duration). The estimated total fee for this amendment will be $132,240.00. As Mr. Lopez's current small A/E contract expires on August 10th; this amendment extends his service to the end of April 2017. LAN understands that we will be responsible for providing any and all resources necessary to accomplish the services including personal protective equipment, computers, cell phone, and local transportation. We recognize that the City has now come to rely more heavily on consulting engineers to help deliver the hundreds of millions of dollars of projects to the public; LAN is here to support. We have an available, highly qualified, professional work force at your disposal supported by the best in the business. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me directly at 361-876- 6395. Sincerely, Scott M. arris, P Regional Manager Copy: Chris Hale, P.E. Attachments: A — Scope of Work B — Contract for Construction Inspection / Construction Observation, dated April 28, 2016. 500 N. Shoreline Blvd, Suite 905 • Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 • 361.882.2257 • www.lan-inc.com EXHIBIT A PAGE 1 OF 2 CI Augment David Lopez Amendment 1 June 8, 2016 Page 2 ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF WORK Construction inspection Staff Augmentation (David Lopez) (El 62471— Construction Inspector will work directly under the supervision of City's Construction Services Department in providing Quality Assurance services and to assist in expediting the contractor's progress by minimizing conflicts and conflict resolution, identifying change order potential, detailing deficient work and repairs and other support related services. Contract Inspector will be required to keep detailed daily inspection reports on provided City forms. Requirements will include producing and organizing the following documentation: • Construction Contractor Progress including installed and completed work, construction crew and equipment available on site, and contract specific conversations held on site concerning construction issues. • Daily and Weekly construction photos including proper labeling/filing of same. • Testing lab results with immediate alerts to City Staff of failures. • Rain days, lost time due to heavy rains, completion of monthly time statements. • Project coordination meetings (conducted by Inspector). • Any site related activity which may impact future / past progress or activity which may significantly impact the construction quality. • Review of all contract documents, Specifications, Plans, Drawings, Addendums and other project -related reports. • Schedule and coordinate the location and frequency of required tests per the specifications with the City's approved materials testing lab. • Work closely with City Department personnel in coordination of construction related activities. • Attend project and coordination meetings. • Review construction contractor Payment Requests, including coordination and acceptance of quantities. • Review and coordinate all approved change orders, field orders and changes. • Communicate with local businesses and residents including meeting with and documenting any citizen or business related concerns or requests. EXHIBIT A PAGE 2 OF 2 X LUX Z X I- H. O ✓ O Z W Z as O m 5 �>> a E = a Invoice Date: CD t.) CD a E 0 0 w co V c '0 N d 0 O . •5 0 a) c> 0 — c 72) O• • E >> Q E O o 0 N Z Q z E 0 0 Basic Services: \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ \ 0 0 O O \ 0 O 0'9 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O 0'9 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O O O O O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Preliminary Phase Design Phase co co L OQ CD LT) Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Additional Services: Warranty Phase 0 & M Manuals O 0 Subtotal Additional Services Basic Services Fees Additional Services Fees Total of Fees Exhibit "B" Page 1 of 1 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST City of Corpus Christi Cityof Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking too business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definitions. COMPANYNAME: Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: 500 N. Shoreline Blvd., Suite 905 CITY: Corpus Christi ZIP: 78401 FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 4. Association A 2. Partnership 5. Other B 3. Sole Owner ❑ DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each `employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm.' Name Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Board, Commission or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Consultant FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Steven A. Gilbreath, P.E. Title: Associate (Type or Print) Signature of Certifying Person: DEFINITIONS Date: a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. g. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AMENDMENT NO. 1 CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The City of Corpus Christi, Texas, hereinafter called "CITY," and LNV, Inc. hereinafter called "CONSULTANT," agree to the following amendment to the Contract for Professional Services for Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation — Jose De Leon (Project No. E16247) as authorized and administratively amended by: Original Contract February 29, 2016 Administrative Approval 49,500.00 IN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT, SECTION 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES, shall be modified as shown in Exhibit "A". IN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT, SECTION 4. FEES, shall be modified for an additional fee not to exceed $137,700.00 (in figures) One Hundred Thirty Seven Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars and Zero Cents (in words) for a total restated fee not to exceed $187,200.00(in figures) One Hundred Eighty Seven Thousand Two Hundred Dollars and Zero Cents (in words). All other terms and conditions of the February 29, 2016 contract between the "CITY" and "CONSULTANT" and of any amendments to that contract which are not specifically addressed herein shall remain in full force and effect. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI LNV, INC. J. H. Edmonds, P.E. Director of Engineering Services APPROVED AS TO FORM Legal Department Date APPROVED AS TO FUNDING Office of Mgmt and Budget Date ATTEST City Secretary Dan S. Leyendecker, P.E. Date President 801 Navigation, Suite 300 Corpus Christi, TX 78408 (361) 883-1984 Office (361) 883-1986 Fax Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation — Jose De Leon, E16247 LNV, Amendment No. 1, $137,700.00 Not to Exceed $187,200.00 Fund Name Accounting Unit Account No. Activity No. Account Category Amount Wastewater RvBd 4249-042 550910 E15209014249EXP 90910 $137,700.00 Total $137,700.00 Encumbrance No. AMD. NO. 1 Page 2 of 2 LNV SOLUTIONS TODAY WITH engineers I architects I contractors A VISION FOR TOMORROW June 6, 2016 J.H. Edmonds, P.E. Director of Engineering Services City of Corpus Christi 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 RE: Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation Project No. E16247 Contract Amendment No. 1 Dear Mr. Edmonds: Please allow this to serve as our formal proposal to extend Construction Inspection services. This amendment is to our executed contract dated March 1, 2016 for our inspector Jose DeLeon to provide services on this project. This will be at the agreed hourly rate of $90/hr. The total for this Contract Amendment No. 1 is not to exceed $137,700.00. The original Small A/E contract covered approximately 14 -weeks of services based on a 40 -hour workweek. This amendment extends services an additional 38 -weeks to complete a year of services. Based on experience with the original contract we are aware that this is an hourly contract and in some cases more than 40 -hours a week are required. At this time, Mr. DeLeon's workload schedule is such that he can continue to be available immediately upon request. We appreciate the opportunity to provide this Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation Services on this project for the City of Corpus Christi. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to contact me via phone at 361-883-1984 or email at LoganB@lnvinc.com. Respectfully, Lagan Burton, PE, CFM Principal/Vice President 6/4A, cc: Chris Hale, PE -City of Corpus Christi Engineering Services 801 NAVIGATION I SUITE 300 I CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78408 OFFICE 361.883.1984 I FAX 361.883.1986 I WWw.LNVINC.COM EXHIBIT A PAGE 1 OF 1 X LUX Z X I- H. O ✓ O Z W Z as O m 5 �>> a E = a Invoice Date: CD t.) CD a E 0 0 w co V c '0 N d 0 O . •5 0 a) c> 0 — c 72) O• • E >> Q E O o 0 N Z Q z E 0 0 Basic Services: \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ \ 0 0 O O \ 0 O 0'9 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O 0'9 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O O O O O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Preliminary Phase Design Phase co co L OQ CD LT) Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Additional Services: Warranty Phase 0 & M Manuals O 0 Subtotal Additional Services Basic Services Fees Additional Services Fees Total of Fees Exhibit "B" Page 1 of 1 Arw m. City of Corpus Christi SUPPLIER NUMBER TO BE ASSIGNED 8Y CFI Y PURCHASING DIVISION CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definition. COMPANY NAME: LNV, Inc. P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: 801 Navigation, Suite 300 FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 4. Association CITY: Corpus Christi 2 Partnership 5. Other B ZIP: 78408 3. Sole Owner DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Title AKA 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3°o or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Board, Commission or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3°'u or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." NameA A Consultant FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Dan S. Leyendecker, E. Title: President (Type or Print) Signature of Certifying Person: EFINITIONS Date: 4 /2,M, a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." g. "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AMENDMENT NO. 1 CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The City of Corpus Christi, Texas, hereinafter called "CITY," and Maverick Engineering, Inc. hereinafter called "CONSULTANT," agree to the following amendment to the Contract for Professional Services for Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation — Joe Sandoval (Project No. E16247) as authorized and administratively amended by: Original Contract February 29, 2016 Administrative Approval 49,500.00 IN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT, SECTION 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES, shall be modified as shown in Exhibit "A". IN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT, SECTION 4. FEES, shall be modified for an additional fee not to exceed $295,200.00 (in figures) Two Hundred Ninety Five Thousand Two Hundred Dollars and Zero Cents (in words) for a total restated fee not to exceed $344,700.00 (in figures) Three Hundred Forty Four Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars and Zero Cents (in words). All other terms and conditions of the February 29, 2016 contract between the "CITY" and "CONSULTANT" and of any amendments to that contract which are not specifically addressed herein shall remain in full force and effect. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI MAVERICK ENGINEERING, INC. J. H. Edmonds, P.E. Director of Engineering Services APPROVED AS TO FORM Legal Department Date APPROVED AS TO FUNDING Office of Mgmt and Budget Date ATTEST City Secretary 7,z Michel Michellert'a fon, P. E. Date Infrastructure Group Manager 400 Mann Street, Suite 200 Corpus Christi, TX 784101 (361) 696-3500 Office (361) 696-3599 Fax Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation — Joe Sandoval, E16247 Maverick Engineering, Amendment No. 1, $295,200 Not to Exceed $344,700 Fund Name Accounting Unit Account No. Activity No. Account Category Amount Streets O&M 1041-12415-051 530000 E14021011041EXP 30000 $147,600.00 Streets O&M 1041-12415-051 530000 E15140011041EXP 30000 $147,600.00 Total $295,200.00 Encumbrance No. AMD. NO. 1 Page 2 of 2 MAVERICK ENGINEERING INC. www.raverickengineering.corn June 2, 2016 Mr. Chris Hale, P.E. Project Manager City of Corpus Christi 1201 Leopard Street, 3`a Floor Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Re: RFP 2015-07 Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation Services — Amendment #1 Street Pavement Maintenance Program Dear Mr. Hale: Maverick Engineering, Inc. is pleased to present the following proposal for the Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation Services -Street Pavement Maintenance Program for a total of $295,200 for 82 weeks or 3280 manhours. The rates for the proposed staff members are listed below. Joe Sandoval Construction Inspection $90/hour The rates are for work related to the construction inspection services described in City of Corpus Christi RFQ 2015-07. We look forward to working with the City on the upcoming capital improvements. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please contact me at (361) 696-3512. Respectfully, Maverick Engineering, Inc. eld/(`Pd-/--/- Michelle Patton, P.E. Infrastructure Group Manager 400 Mann St., Suite 200 Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 361.696-3500 • Fax 361.696-3599 • www.maverickengineering.com EXHIBIT A PAGE 1 OF 1 X LUX Z X I- H. O ✓ O Z W Z as O m 5 �>> a E = a Invoice Date: CD t.) CD a E 0 0 w co V c '0 N d 0 O . •5 0 a) c> 0 — c 72) O• • E >> Q E O o 0 N Z Q z E 0 0 Basic Services: \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ \ 0 0 O O \ 0 O 0'9 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O 0'9 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O O O O O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Preliminary Phase Design Phase co co L OQ CD LT) Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Additional Services: Warranty Phase 0 & M Manuals O 0 Subtotal Additional Services Basic Services Fees Additional Services Fees Total of Fees Exhibit "B" Page 1 of 1 SUPPLIER NUMBER TO BE ASSIGNED BY CITY PURCHASING DIVISION wv City of CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Corpus DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Christi City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definitions. COMPANY NAME: P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: 400 Ma vier !-(2ITY: drifsam.# ZIP: 7k46) FIRM IS: 1. Corporation111 4. Association 2. Partnership 3. Sole Owner ❑ 5. Other DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name N/A- Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name N/A Board, Commission or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Consultant 4//4 EXHIBIT C Page 1 of 2 FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Mid; elk (Type or Print) Signature of Certifying Person: Title: 414 1,4-61eL-._ Date: Z7//,/, DEFINITIONS a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." g. "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. EXHIBIT C Page 2 of 2 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of July 19, 2016 DATE: June 30, 2016 TO: Margie Rose, Interim City Manager FROM: Belinda Mercado, Director of IT BelindaM@cctexas.com (361) 826-3740 Approving the purchase of Cisco SmartNet maintenance for the City's Network Infrastructure and Internet Equipment CAPTION: Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to approve the purchase of three years Cisco SmartNet maintenance with Great South Texas Corp dba Computer Solutions of San Antonio, Texas, DIR-TSO-2542, for a total expenditure of $485,731.11. Funds are available in the Information Technology Department FY2015-2016 budget. PURPOSE: To provide continued support and maintenance for our existing network infrastructure and internet equipment. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Hardware and software support is required to maintain updates for network equipment that includes security, software and hardware updates, and support services for critical network infrastructure. The Cisco SmartNet purchase will ensure that the City of Corpus Christi has support for the core network equipment located at City Hall, Police Department, Fleet Services, Holly Pump Station, Flour Bluff water tower, Frost Building Emergency Operation Center, and the O.N. Stevens Water Plant. Only critical equipment has been identified for maintenance that requires 24x7 support. This agreement will also provide direct access to networking engineers and specialized experts. Aging equipment can be a source of unexpected outages and support is crucial to maximizing service availability. A network maintenance agreement will ensure that the City of Corpus Christi has the required support. Cisco has provided valuable service for to the City of Corpus Christi for over 20 years. ALTERNATIVES: Provision for no maintenance on network and Internet hardware with a high risk of service interruption and high replacement costs when failures occur. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The proposed purchase conforms with City purchasing policies and procedures. EMERGENCY/NON-EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Information Technology Department Office of Management and Budget Finance Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015- Project to Date Expenditure Current Future TOTALS Line Item Budget $485,731. $485,73 Encumbere d/ $0.00 $0.00 This item $485,731. $485,73 BALANCE $ $ Fund(s):5210 Comments: Funds are available in the Information Technology Department FY2015-2016 budget. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this agenda item. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Computer Solutions Smartnet DIR Quote DIR Contract nornpuber solutions ic BUSINESS- TECHNOLOGY, INNOVATION Customer City of Corpus Christi (16975) Trevino, David 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, TX 78401 United States (P) 361-826-4091 (F) 361-826-4551 Great South Texas Corp dba Computer Solutions 814 Arion Parkway, Suite 101 San Antonio, Texas 78216 United States http://www.comsoltx.com (P) (210) 369-0300 (F) 210-369-0389 Bill To City of Corpus Christi Accounts, Payables 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, TX 78401 United States (P) 361-826-4091 (F) 361-826-4551 Quote (Open) Date Jun 21, 2016 07:25 AM CDT Doc # 61081 - rev l of l Expiration Date 2016-07-21 Description v2-CoCC Smartnet 10/31/18 CoTerm SalesRep Jones, David (P) 210-369-0318 (F) 210-369-0389 Customer Contact Trevino, David (P) 361-826-3754 dtrevino@cctexas.com 1 Ship To City of Corpus Christi MIS, Data Center 1201 Leopard Street, City Hall Basement Corpus Christi, TX 78401 United States DIR Program: DIR-TSO-2542 Expires 05/05/2017 Certifications: WBE/SBE/HUB# 1942650013800 Exp:05/13/2018 Sales Order Type: Drop Ship Customer PO: Terms: Net 30 Days Special Instructions: Ship Via: FedEx Ground Carrier Account #: # Image Description Part # 'ce Qty Unit Price Total Reference Doc: v2-CoCC-SmartnetRnwl-3YR (2.16.16) 1 Quote #: 10204986 IBil WiFi/ASA/Router/Camera/UCS/Nexus/Switching 2 Quote #: 10205578 ® Nexus 5/2K's 3 Quote #: 10205005 E il VMware Licensing 4 Quote #: 10205472 E il CCX & Prime Lic'ing 5 Quote #: 11217038 Unified Comm UWL Lic'ing 6 Quote #: 10205483 UCS Servers 7 Quote #: 10205495 ® Video Surv. Licesning 8 Quote #: 10205065 Video Surv. Hardware Smartnet Renewal Smartnet Renewal Smartnet Renewal Smartnet Renewal Smartnet Renewal Smartnet Renewal Smartnet Renewal Smartnet Renewal $243,757.55 1 $188,731.82 $188,731.82 $12,618.00 1 $9,487.66 $9,487.66 $12,600.00 1 $9,474.13 $9,474.13 $76,612.63 1 $59,464.27 $59,464.27 $222,300.00 1 $171,549.37 $171,549.37 $5,154.08 1 $4,067.27 $4,067.27 $18,606.00 1 $13,990.13 $13,990.13 $11,497.47 1 $8,924.00 $8,924.00 # Image Description 9 Quote #: 10205547 ® VMware Licensing 10 Quote #: 10285046 Video Surv. Licensing Smartnet Renewal Smartnet Renewal List Price Qty Unit Price Total $10,000 in Cisco Learning Credits, $0 Cost to City of CC 11 Cisco Learning Credits TRN-CLC-055 $1,000 Credits Per Unit in Qty 10 (Total of $10,000 in Credits) Cisco DIR-TSO-2542 TX DIR Contract Expiration: 5/5/2018 Vendor ID: 1942650013800 (Great South Texas Corp dba Computer Solutions) Computer Solutions Co. Certifications: HUB (Historically Underutilized Business) Certification #1942650013800 Expires 05/13/2018 WBE (Women Business Enterprise) - Expires 7/31/2016 SBE (Small Business Enterprise) Certification #211089371 - Expires 8/31/2017 Thank you for the opportunity to provide this quote. This quote is valid for 30 days. Freight charges are estimates only. Returns are subject to approval and may include a restocking fee. $1,976.88 1 $1,534.39 $1,534.39 $23,845.35 1 $18,508.07 $18,508.07 $1,000.00 10 Subtotal $485,731.11 $0.00 Subtotal: Tax (0.000%): Shipping: Total: (List Price: $0.00 Subtotal $0.00 $485,731.11 $0.00 $0.00 $485,731.11 $638, 967.96) DIR Contract No. DIR-TSO-2542 Vendor Contract No. STATE OF TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION RESOURCES CONTRACT FOR PRODUCTS AND RELATED SERVICES CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1. Introduction A. Parties This Contract for Products and Related Services ("Contract") is entered into between the State of Texas ("State"), acting by and through the Department of Information Resources ("DIR") with its principal place of business at 300 West 15th Street, Suite 1300, Austin, Texas 78701, and Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Vendor"), with its principal place of business at 170 West Tasman Drive, San Jose, California 95134. B. Compliance with Procurement Laws This Contract is the result of compliance with applicable procurement laws of the State. DIR issued a solicitation on the Comptroller of Public Accounts' Electronic State Business Daily, Request for Offer (RFO) DIR-TSO-TMP-215, on December 6, 2013, for Cisco Branded Equipment and Related Services. Upon execution of this Contract, a notice of award for RFO DIR-TSO-TMP-215 shall be posted by DIR on the Electronic State Business Daily. C. Order of Precedence This Contract; Appendix A, Standard Terms and Conditions For Products and Related Services Contracts; Appendix B, Vendor's Historically Underutilized Businesses Subcontracting Plan; Appendix C, Pricing Index; Appendix D, End User License Agreement; Appendix E, Service Agreement; Appendix F, Non -Entitlement Destroyed Products, Appendix F1, Non -Entitlement Scrapped Products; Appendix F2, Non - Entitlement Stolen Products; Appendix F3, Non -Entitlement Non -Genuine Products; Appendix F4, Non -Entitlement Secondary Market Products; Exhibit 1, Vendor's Response to RFO DIR-TSO-TMP-215, including all addenda; and Exhibit 2, RFO DIR- TSO-TMP-215, including all addenda; are incorporated by reference and constitute the entire agreement between DIR and Vendor. In the event of a conflict between the documents listed in this paragraph, the controlling document shall be this Contract, then Appendix A, then Appendix B, then Appendix C, then Appendix D, then Appendix E, then Appendix F, then Appendix F1, then Appendix F2, then Appendix F3, then Appendix F4, then Exhibit 1, and finally Exhibit 2. In the event and to the extent any provisions contained in multiple documents address the same or substantially the same subject matter but do not actually conflict, the more recent provisions shall be deemed to have superseded earlier provisions. 2. Term of Contract The term of this Contract shall be one (1) year commencing on the last date of approval 10/30/13 Page 1 of 16 DIR Contract No. DIR-TSO-2542 Vendor Contract No. by DIR and Vendor. Prior to expiration of the original term, DIR may extend the Contract, by amendment for up to three (3) optional one-year terms. Protracted contract negotiations may, in DIR' s sole discretion, result in fewer optional renewal terms. 3. Product and Service Offerings A. Products Products available under this Contract are limited to Cisco Branded products as specified in Appendix C, Pricing Index. Vendor may incorporate changes to their product offering; however, any changes must be within the scope of the RFO and products awarded based on the posting described in Section 1.B above. Vendor may not add a manufacturer's product line which was not included in the Vendor's response to the solicitation described in Section 1.B above. B. Services Services available under this Contract are limited to Cisco Branded services as specified in the RFO and Appendix C, Pricing Index. Vendor may incorporate changes to their service offering; however, any changes must be within the scope of services awarded based on the posting described in Section 1.B above. C. Emerging Technologies and Future Acquisitions DIR recognizes that technology is ever -evolving and advancing. DIR reserves the right to consider the addition of emerging technology such as next generation, enhancements and upgrades for products or services that are within the scope of data communications and networking equipment and related services. Vendor may propose such products or services throughout the term of the contract. Pricing and terms will be negotiated upon DIR acceptance. Any determination will be at DIR's sole discretion and any decision will be final. In addition, Texas DIR and Vendor may mutually agree to add future acquisitions of Cisco to the contract. Subsequent terms of the acquisition(s) and pricing will be mutually agreed upon in writing and amended under the contract. 4. Pricing Pricing to the DIR Customer shall be as set forth in Appendix A, Section 8, Pricing, Purchase Orders, Invoices and Payment, and as set forth in Appendix C, Pricing Index, and shall include the DIR Administrative Fee. 5. DIR Administrative Fee A) The administrative fee to be paid by the Vendor to DIR based on the Net Purchase Price (as later defined in this Section) to Customers pursuant to this Contract is three quarters of one percent (.75%). For example, the administrative fee for sales totaling $100,000 shall be $750.00. "Net Purchase Price" = Vendor's product list price, minus all applicable contract discounts, rebates or value added incentives and excluding sales, use or other applicable taxes, surcharges or like fees, to the extent applicable to an order. 10/30/13 Page 2 of 16 DIR Contract No. DIR-TSO-2542 Vendor Contract No. B) All prices quoted to Customers shall include the administrative fee. DIR reserves the right to change this fee upwards or downwards during the term of this Contract, upon thirty (30) days advance written notice to Vendor without further requirement for a formal contract amendment. Any change in the administrative fee shall be incorporated by Vendor in the price to the Customer. 6. Notification All notices under this Contract shall be sent to a party at the respective address indicated below. If sent to the State: Dana L. Collins, CTPM, CTCM Manager, Contract and Vendor Management Department of Information Resources 300 W. 15th St., Suite 1300 Austin, Texas 78701 Phone: (512) 936-2233 Facsimile: (512) 475-4759 Email: dana.collins@dir.texas.gov If sent to the Vendor: Mimi Farr Cisco Systems, Inc. 2375 E. Camelback Road, 4th Floor Phoenix, AZ 85016 Phone: 408-527-2627 Email: mimnguye@cisco.com 7. Software License and Service Agreements A. End User License Agreement 1) Customers acquiring software licenses under the Contract shall hold, use and operate such software subject to compliance with the End User License Agreement set forth in Appendix D of this Contract. No changes to the End User License Agreement terms and conditions may be made unless previously agreed to between Vendor and DIR. Customers may not add, delete or alter any of the language in Appendix D. Vendor and Order Fulfiller shall make the End User License Agreement terms and conditions available to all Customers at all times. 2) Compliance with the End User License Agreement is the responsibility of the Customer. DIR shall not be responsible for any Customer' s compliance with the End User License Agreement. If DIR purchases software licenses for its own use under this Contract, it shall be responsible for its compliance with the End User License Agreement terms and conditions. 10/30/13 Page 3 of 16 DIR Contract No. DIR-TSO-2542 Vendor Contract No. B. Shrink/Click-wrap License Agreement Regardless of any other provision or other license terms which may be issued by Vendor after the effective date of this Contract, and irrespective of whether any such provisions have been proposed prior to or after the issuance of a Purchase Order for products licensed under this Contract, or the fact that such other agreement may be affixed to or accompany software upon delivery (shrink-wrap), the terms and conditions set forth in this Contract shall supersede and govern the license terms between Customers and Vendor. It is the Customer's responsibility to read the Shrink/Click-wrap License Agreement and determine if the Customer accepts the license terms as amended by this Contract. If the Customer does not agree with the license terms, Customer shall be responsible for negotiating with the reseller to obtain additional changes in the Shrink/Click-wrap License Agreement language from the software publisher. C. Service Agreement Services provided under this Contract shall be in accordance with the Service Agreement as set forth in Appendix E of this Contract. No changes to the Service Agreement terms and conditions may be made unless previously agreed to by Vendor and DIR. D. Conflicting or Additional Terms In the event that conflicting or additional terms in Vendor Software License Agreements, Shrink/Click Wrap License Agreements, Service Agreements or linked or supplemental documents amend or diminish the rights of DIR Customers or the State, such conflicting or additional terms shall not take precedence over the terms of this Contract. 8. Authorized Exceptions to Contract or any Appendices. A. Section 3. Definitions, G. Purchase Order is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows: Purchase Order - the Customer's fiscal form or format, which is used when making a purchase (e.g., formal written Purchase Order, Procurement Card, Electronic Purchase Order, or other authorized instrument). The terms of this agreement supercedes any terms printed on Customer's Purchase Order and any Purchase Order terms are null and void. B. Section 4. General Provisions, D. Assignment is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows: DIR or Vendor may assign the Contract without prior written approval to: i) a successor in interest (for DIR, another Texas state agency as designated by the Texas Legislature), or ii) a subsidiary, parent company or affiliate, or iii) as necessary to satisfy a regulatory requirement imposed upon a party by a governing body with the appropriate authority. Assignment of the Contract under the above terms shall require 10/30/13 Page 4 of 16 DIR Contract No. DIR-TSO-2542 Vendor Contract No. written notification by the assigning party. Any other assignment by a party shall require the written consent of the other party. Each party agrees to cooperate to amend the Contract as necessary to maintain an accurate record of the contracting parties. C. Section 5. Intellectual Property Matters is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows: This contract does not contemplate, authorize or support acquisition of custom software products or services. If Vendor and Customer seek to contract for such product or service, they must use a separate contract or seek amendment with DIR of this contract. If DIR and Vendor decide to authorize customized software or hardware products; then the intellectual property language will be negotiated and applied. D. Section 7. Contract Fulfillment and Promotion, A. Service, Sales and Support of the Contract is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows: Vendor shall provide service, sales and support resources to serve all Customers throughout the State. It is the responsibility of the Vendor to sell, market, and promote services available under the Contract. Vendor shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to ensure that potential Customers are made aware of the existence of the Contract. All sales to Customers for services available under the Contract shall be processed through the Contract. E. Section 7. Contract Fulfillment and Promotion, E. Internet Access to Contract and Pricing Information is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows: 1) Vendor Website Within thirty days of the effective date of the Contract, Vendor will establish and maintain a website specific to the product and service offerings under the Contract which is clearly distinguishable from other, non-DIR Contract offerings at Vendor's website. The website must include: the product and services categories offered, product and service specifications (if applicable), Contract pricing, designated Order Fulfillers, contact information for Vendor and designated Order Fulfillers, instructions for obtaining quotes and placing Purchase Orders, and warranty and return policies. The Vendor' s website shall list the DIR Contract number, reference the DIR Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Cooperative Contracts program, display the DIR logo in accordance with the requirements in paragraph F of this Section, and contain a link to the DIR website for the Contract. 2) Accurate and Timely Contract Information Vendor warrants and represents that the website information specified in the above paragraph will be accurately and completely posted, maintained and displayed in an objective and timely manner Vendor, at its own expense, shall correct any non- conforming or inaccurate information posted at Vendor's website within thirty (30) business days after written notification by DIR. 10/30/13 Page 5 of 16 DIR Contract No. DIR-TSO-2542 Vendor Contract No. 3) Website Compliance Checks Periodic compliance checks of the information posted for the Contract on Vendor' s website will be conducted by DIR. Upon request by DIR, Vendor shall provide verifiable documentation that pricing listed upon this website is uniform with the pricing as stated in Section 4 of the Contract. 4) Website Changes Vendor hereby consents to a link from the DIR website to Vendor's website in order to facilitate access to Contract information. The establishment of the link is provided solely for convenience in carrying out the business operations of the State. DIR reserves the right to terminate or remove a link at any time, in its sole discretion, without advance notice, or to deny a future request for a link. DIR will provide Vendor with subsequent notice of link termination or removal. Vendor shall provide DIR with timely written notice of any change in URL or other information needed to access the site and/or maintain the link. 5) Use of Access Data Prohibited If Vendor stores, collects or maintains data electronically as a condition of accessing Contract information, such data shall only be used internally by Vendor for the purpose of implementing or marketing the Contract, and shall not be disseminated to third parties or used for other marketing purposes. The Contract constitutes a public document under the laws of the State and Vendor shall not restrict DIR or Customer access to Contract terms and conditions including pricing, i.e., through use of restrictive technology or passwords. 6) Responsibility for Content Vendor is solely responsible for administration, content, intellectual property rights, and all materials at Vendor's website. DIR reserves the right to require a change of listed content if, in the opinion of DIR, it does not adequately represent the Contract. F. Section 7. Contract Fulfillment and Promotion, G. Vendor and Order Fulfiller Logo is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows: In the event DIR should need use of Vendor Logo, written mutually agreed upon criteria will be coordinated with Vendor. G. Section 8. Purchase Orders, Invoices, Payments, C. Customer Price, is hereby replaced in its entirety: 1) The price to the Customer shall be calculated as follows: Customer Price = MSRP — Customer Discount 2) Customers purchasing products and services under this Contract may negotiate more advantageous pricing or participate in special promotional offers. In such event, a copy of such better offerings shall be furnished to DIR upon request. 3) If pricing for Vendor' s products or services available under this Contract are 10/30/13 Page 6 of 16 DIR Contract No. DIR-TSO-2542 Vendor Contract No. provided at a lower price to: (i) an eligible Customer in Texas who is not purchasing those products or services under this Contract or (ii) any other Texas entity or consortia authorized by Texas law to sell said products and services to eligible Customers, then the available Customer Price in this Contract shall be adjusted to that lower price prospectively. This requirement applies to products or services quoted directly by Cisco Systems, Inc. for a quantity of one (1) under like terms and conditions, and does not apply to volume or special pricing purchases. Upon either Customer' s notice to Vendor, or Vendor' s notice to Customer that the party(ies) have become aware of this pricing differential and the pricing differential has been confirmed by Vendor or Customer provides reasonable confirmation to Vendor, this Contract shall be amended within ten (10) business days to reflect the lower price. H. Section 8. Purchase Orders, Invoices, Payments, H. Changes to Prices, is hereby replaced in its entirety: Vendor may change the price of any product or service at any time, based upon changes to the MSRP, but discount levels shall remain consistent with the discount levels specified in this Contract. Price decreases shall take effect once 1) Vendor notifies DIR of any pricing changes and 2) the pricelist has been updated / posted on the DIR webpage. I. Section 8. Purchase Orders, Invoices, Payments, L. Transfer of Title is hereby added to this section as follows: Transfer of Title shall occur upon acceptance of goods. Customer shall have five (5) business days after delivery to accept product. Absent written rejection within the five (5) business days, product will be deemed accepted without waiving the right to return product as set forth under Vendor warranty provisions. J. Section 9. Contract Administration, B. Reporting and Administrative Fees is hereby replaced in its entirety: 1) Reporting Responsibility a) Vendor shall be responsible for reporting all products and services purchased through Order Fulfillers under the Contract. Vendor shall file the monthly reports, subcontract reports, and pay the administrative fees in accordance with the due dates specified in this section. b) DIR shall have the right to verify required reports and to take any actions necessary to enforce its rights under this section, including but not limited to, compliance checks of Vendor's applicable Contract books at DIR's expense. 2) Detailed Monthly Report Vendor shall electronically provide DIR with a detailed monthly report in the format required by DIR showing the dollar volume of any and all Net Purchase Price for invoices billed under the Contract for the previous month period. Reports shall be submitted to the DIR ICT Cooperative Contracts E -Mail Box at 10/30/13 Page 7 of 16 DIR Contract No. DIR-TSO-2542 Vendor Contract No. ict.sales@dir.texas.gov. Reports are due on the fifteenth (15th) calendar day after the close of the previous month period. It is the responsibility of Vendor to collect and compile all sales under the Contract from participating Order Fulfillers and submit one (1) monthly report. The monthly report shall include, per transaction: the detailed sales for the period, the Order Fulfiller's company name, if applicable, Customer name, invoice date, invoice number, description, part number, manufacturer, quantity, unit price, extended price, Customer Purchase Order number, contact name, Customer's complete billing address, and other information as required by DIR. Each report must contain all information listed above per transaction or the report will be rejected and returned to the Vendor for correction in accordance with this section. 3) Historically Underutilized Businesses Subcontract Reports a) If Historically Underutilized Businesses are used by Vendor, Vendor shall electronically provide each Customer with their relevant Historically Underutilized Business Subcontracting Report, pursuant to the Contract, as required by Chapter 2161, Texas Government Code. Reports shall also be submitted to DIR. b) Reports shall be due in accordance with the CPA rules. 4) DIR Administrative Fee a) An administrative fee shall be paid by Vendor to DIR to defray the DIR costs of negotiating, executing, and administering the Contract. The maximum administrative fee is set by the Texas Legislature in the biennial General Appropriations Act. Payment of the administrative fee shall be due on the fifteenth (15th) calendar day after the close of the previous month period. DIR may change the amount of the administrative fee upon thirty (30) days written notice to Vendor without the need for a formal contract amendment. b) Vendor shall reference the DIR Contract number on any remittance instruments. 5) Accurate and Timely Submission of Reports a) The reports and administrative fees shall be accurate and timely and submitted in accordance with the due dates specified in this section. Vendor shall correct any inaccurate reports or administrative fee payments within three (3) business days upon written notification by DIR. Vendor shall deliver any late reports or late administrative fee payments within ten (10) business days upon written notification by DIR. If Vendor is unable to correct inaccurate reports or administrative fee payments or deliver late reports and fee payments within three (3) business days, Vendor must contact DIR and provide a corrective plan of action, including the timeline for completion of correction. The corrective plan of action shall be subject to DIR approval, such approval not unreasonably withheld. b) Should Vendor fail to correct inaccurate reports or cure the delay in timely delivery of reports and payments within the corrective plan of action timeline, DIR reserves the right to require an independent third party audit of the Vendor's records as specified in C.3 of this Section, at DIR's expense. 10/30/13 Page 8 of 16 DIR Contract No. DIR-TSO-2542 Vendor Contract No. c) Failure to timely submit three (3) reports within any rolling twelve (12) month period may, at DIR's discretion, result in termination of Vendor's Contract. K. Section 9. Contract Administration, C. Records and Audit, paragraph 3) is hereby amended as follows: Vendor and/or Order Fulfillers shall grant access to all paper and electronic records, books, documents, accounting procedures, practices and any other items relevant to the performance of the Contract to the DIR Internal Audit department or DIR Contract Management staff, including the compliance checks designated by the DIR Internal Audit department, DIR Contract Management staff, the State Auditor's Office, and of the United States, and such other persons or entities designated by DIR for the purposes of inspecting, Compliance Checking and/or copying such books and records. Vendor and/or Order Fulfillers shall provide copies and printouts requested by DIR without charge. DIR shall provide Vendor and/or Order Fulfillers thirty (30) business days' notice prior to inspecting, Compliance Checking, and/or copying Vendor's and/or Order Fulfiller's records. Vendor's and/or Order Fulfillers records, whether paper or electronic, shall be made available during regular office hours. Vendor and/or Order Fulfiller personnel familiar with the Vendor's and/or Order Fulfiller's books and records shall be available to the DIR Internal Audit department, or DIR Contract Management staff and designees as needed. Vendor and/or Order Fulfiller shall provide adequate office space to DIR staff during the performance of Compliance Check. If Vendor is found to be responsible for inaccurate reports, DIR may invoice for the reasonable costs of the audit, which Vendor must pay within thirty (30) days of receipt. L. Section 10. Vendor Responsibilities, A. Indemnification, 2) Acts or Omissions is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows: Vendor shall indemnify and hold harmless the State of Texas and Customers, AND/OR THEIR EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES, CONTRACTORS, AND/OR PERMITTED ASSIGNEES, FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, ACTIONS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, OR SUITS, AND ALL RELATED REASONABLE COSTS, ATTORNEY FEES, AND EXPENSES resulting from bodily injury (including death) or damage to tangible property to the extent directly arising out of, or resulting from any negligent acts or omissions, or willful misconduct of the Vendor or its agents, employees, or subcontractors, in the execution or performance of the Contract and any Purchase Orders issued under the Contract. THE DEFENSE SHALL BE COORDINATED BY THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR TEXAS STATE AGENCY CUSTOMERS AND BY CUSTOMER' S LEGAL COUNSEL FOR NON -STATE AGENCY CUSTOMERS. 10/30/13 Page 9 of 16 DIR Contract No. DIR-TSO-2542 Vendor Contract No. M. Section 10. Vendor Responsibilities, A. Indemnification, 3) Infringements is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows: a) Vendor shall indemnify and hold harmless the State of Texas and Customers, AND/OR THEIR EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES, CONTRACTORS, ASSIGNEES, AND/OR DESIGNEES, from any and all third party claims for infringement of United States patents, copyrights, trade and service marks, and any other intellectual or intangible property rights in connection with the PERFORMANCES OR ACTIONS OF VENDOR PURSUANT TO THIS CONTRACT. VENDOR AND THE CUSTOMER AGREE TO FURNISH TIMELY WRITTEN NOTICE TO EACH OTHER OF ANY SUCH CLAIM. VENDOR SHALL BE LIABLE TO PAY ALL REASONABLE COSTS OF DEFENSE INCLUDING ATTORNEYS' FEES FOR STATE AGENCY CUSTOMERS. THE DEFENSE SHALL BE COORDINATED BY THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR TEXAS STATE AGENCY CUSTOMERS AND BY CUSTOMER'S LEGAL COUNSEL FOR NON -STATE AGENCY CUSTOMERS. Notwithstanding the foregoing, such indemnity shall not apply, and Vendor shall have no liability, for any claim of infringement caused solely by: a) Modification of a product by Customer or a third party b) The amount or duration of use which Customer makes of the Product, revenue earned by Customer from services it provides that use the Product, or services offered by Customer to external or internal customers c) Combination, operation, or use of a product with non -Cisco products, software or business processes d) Customer's use of the products after Vendor informs Customer of modifications or a change required to avoid such claims and offers to implement those changes e) any modifications made to the Product by the Vendor pursuant to Customer's specific instructions. b) If Vendor becomes aware of an actual or potential claim, or Customer provides Vendor with notice of an actual or potential claim, Vendor may (or in the case of an injunction against Customer, shall), at Vendor's sole option and expense: (i) procure for the Customer the right to continue to use the affected portion of the product or service, (ii) modify or replace the affected portion of the product or service with functionally equivalent or superior product or service so that Customer' s use is non -infringing. 10/30/13 Page 10 of 16 DIR Contract No. DIR-TSO-2542 Vendor Contract No. N. Section 10. Vendor Responsibilities, B. Taxes/Worker's Compensation/ UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE, Paragraph 2) is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows: VENDOR AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS CUSTOMERS, THE STATE OF TEXAS AND/OR THEIR EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES, CONTRACTORS, AND/OR ASSIGNEES FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, ACTIONS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, OR SUITS, AND ALL RELATED COSTS, REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES, AND EXPENSES, RELATING TO TAX LIABILITY, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE AND/OR WORKERS' COMPENSATION IN ITS PERFORMANCE UNDER THIS CONTRACT. VENDOR SHALL BE LIABLE TO PAY ALL COSTS OF DEFENSE INCLUDING REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES. THE DEFENSE SHALL BE COORDINATED BY VENDOR WITH THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WHEN TEXAS STATE AGENCIES ARE NAMED DEFENDANTS IN ANY LAWSUIT AND VENDOR MAY NOT AGREE TO ANY SETTLEMENT WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE CONCURRENCE FROM THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. VENDOR AND THE CUSTOMER AGREE TO FURNISH TIMELY WRITTEN NOTICE TO EACH OTHER OF ANY SUCH CLAIM. O. Section 10 Vendor Responsibilities, C. Vendor Certifications, (vii) is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows and add (xvi): (vii) Vendor and its principals are not suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government as listed in the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration; (xvi) represent and warrant that the Customer's payment and their receipt of appropriated or other funds under this Agreement are not prohibited by Sections 556.005 or Section 556.008, Texas Government Code. P. Section 10. Vendor Responsibilities, H. Confidentiality is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows: 1) Vendor acknowledges that DIR and Customers that are state agencies are government agencies subject to the Texas Public Information Act. Vendor also acknowledges that DIR and Customers that are state agencies will comply with the Public Information Act, and with all opinions of the Texas Attorney General' s office concerning this Act. 2) Under the terms of the Contract, DIR may provide Vendor with information related to Customers. Vendor shall not re -sell or otherwise distribute or release Customer information to any party in any manner. a) Customer and Vendor agree that in connection with this Contract and their relationship, they may obtain Confidential Information. The receiving party shall 10/30/13 Page 11 of 16 Q. DIR Contract No. DIR-TSO-2542 Vendor Contract No. at all times keep in trust and confidence all such Confidential information, and shall not use such Confidential Information other than as expressly authorized by the disclosing party under this Agreement, nor shall the receiving party disclose any such Confidential Information to third parties without the disclosing party's written consent. Notwithstanding the above, Vendor shall be authorized to disclose Customer's Confidential Information to contractors or employees of a Vendor entity who have a legitimate business need to have access to such information. As allowed under record and retention policies and laws, the receiving party shall immediately return to the disclosing party all Confidential Information (including copies thereof) in the receiving party's possession, custody, or control upon termination or expiration at any time and for any reason of this Agreement. The obligations of confidentiality shall not apply to information which (a) has entered the public domain, except where such entry is the result of the receiving party's breach of this Agreement; (b) prior to disclosure hereunder was already rightfully in the receiving party's possession; (c) subsequent to disclosure hereunder is obtained by the receiving party on a non -confidential basis from a third party who has the right to disclose such information to the receiving party. The receiving party will be authorized to disclose Confidential Information pursuant to a valid order issued by a court or government agency, provided that the receiving party provides (i) prior written notice to the disclosing party of such obligation and (ii) the opportunity to oppose such disclosure. Customer may disclose information necessary to comply with the Texas Public Information Act. Vendor shall not disclose, advertise, or publish the terms and conditions of this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Customer. Any press release or publication by Vendor regarding this Agreement is subject to prior review and written approval of DIR and Customer. Customer may publish the contract in its customary manner or as required by law or for the conducting of public business. Section 10. Vendor Responsibilities, J. Background and/or Criminal History Investigation is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows: Prior to commencement of any services, background and/or criminal history investigation of the Vendor and/or Order Fulfiller's employees and subcontractors who will be providing services to the Customer under the Contract may be performed by certain Customers requiring such investigations. Subject to Customer underwriting the costs incurred for investigations of Vendor's personnel who voluntarily elect to undergo such screening to perform Services, Customer will interface directly with such personnel regarding scheduling the testing and results. Customer understands and agrees that such testing results shall not be communicated directly to Cisco. However, to the extent Customer requires additional candidates for such screening, Cisco will direct volunteers to Customer for follow up. If any Vendor employee refuses to so agree to an investigation, such employee may be denied access to Customer's premises. Should any employee or subcontractor of the Vendor and/or Order Fulfiller who will be providing services to the Customer under the Contract not be acceptable to the Customer as a result of the background and/or criminal history 10/30/13 Page 12 of 16 DIR Contract No. DIR-TSO-2542 Vendor Contract No. check, then Customer may immediately terminate its Purchase Order and related Service Agreement or request replacement of the employee or subcontractor in question. R. Section 10. Vendor Responsibilities, K. Limitation of Liability is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows: For any claim or cause of action arising under or related to the Contract: i) to the extent permitted by the Constitution and the laws of the State of Texas, none of the parties shall be liable to the other for punitive, special, incidental, indirect, lost revenue or lost profits, or consequential damages, whether arising in contract, tort (including negligence) or otherwise even if it is advised of the possibility of such damages; and ii) Vendor's liability for damages of any kind to the Customer shall be limited to the total amount paid to Vendor under the Contract during the twelve months immediately preceding the accrual of the claim or cause of action. However, this limitation of Vendor's liability shall not apply to claims of patent, trademark, or copyright infringement. S. Section 10. Vendor Responsibilities, N. Required Insurance Coverage is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows: As a condition of this Contract with DIR, Vendor shall provide certificates of insurance, or other proof of insurance, reflecting the maintenance of the listed insurance coverage within 5 days of execution of the Contract if the Vendor is awarded services which require that Vendor's employees perform work at any Customer premises and/or use employer vehicles to conduct work on behalf of Customers. In addition, when engaged by a Customer to provide services on Customer premises, the Vendor shall, at its own expense, secure and maintain the insurance coverage specified herein, and shall provide proof of such insurance coverage to the related Customer within five (5) business days following the execution of the Purchase Order. Vendor may not begin performance under the Contract and/or a Purchase Order until such proof of insurance coverage is provided to, and approved by, DIR and the Customer. All required insurance must be issued by companies that have an A.M. Best's financial rating of A- or better and duly licensed, admitted, and authorized to do business in the State of Texas. The Customer and DIR will be named as Additional Insureds on all required coverage. Required coverage must remain in effect through the term of the Contract and each Purchase Order issued to Vendor there under. In the event Vendor receives notice of cancellation of coverage, Vendor shall promptly replace such coverage so that no lapse in insurance occurs. The minimum acceptable insurance provisions are as follows: 1) Commercial General Liability Commercial General Liability must include a combined single limit of $500,000 per occurrence for coverage A, B, & C including products/completed operations, where appropriate, with a separate aggregate of $500,000. The policy shall contain the following provisions: 10/30/13 Page 13 of 16 DIR Contract No. DIR-TSO-2542 Vendor Contract No. a) Blanket contractual liability coverage for liability assumed under the Contract; b) Independent Contractor coverage; c) State of Texas, DIR and Customer listed as an additional insured; but only to the extent of liabilities falling within Vendor's contractual and indemnity obligations pursuant to this Agreement; and d) Waiver of Transfer Right of Recovery Against Others in favor of DIR and/or Customer, but only to the extent of liabilities falling within Vendor's contractual and indemnity obligations pursuant to this Agreement. 2) Workers' Compensation Insurance Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employers' Liability coverage must include limits consistent with statutory benefits outlined in the Texas Workers' Compensation Act (Art. 8308-1.01 et seq. Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat) and minimum policy limits for Employers' Liability of $250,000 bodily injury per accident, $500,000 bodily injury disease policy limit and $250,000 per disease per employee. 3) Business Automobile Liability Insurance Business Automobile Liability Insurance must cover all owned, non -owned and hired vehicles with a minimum combined single limit of $500,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. Alternative acceptable limits are $250,000 bodily injury per person, $500,000 bodily injury per occurrence and at least $100,000 property damage liability per accident. The policy shall contain the following endorsements in favor of DIR and/or Customer: a) Waiver of Subrogation, but only to the extent of liabilities falling within Vendor's contractual and indemnity obligations pursuant to the terms of this Agreement; b) Definition of Insured to include those parties to whom Vendor owes contractual liability coverage. T. Section 11. Contract Enforcement, B. Termination, 2) Absolute Right is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows: DIR shall have the absolute right to terminate the Contract without recourse in the event that: i) Vendor becomes listed on the prohibited vendors list authorized by Executive Order #13224, "Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Persons Who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism ", published by the United States Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control; ii) Vendor becomes suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government as listed in the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration; or (iii) Vendor is found by DIR to be ineligible to hold this Contract under Subsection (b) of Section 2155.006, Texas Government Code. Vendor shall be provided written notice in accordance with Section 12.A, Notices, of intent to terminate. 10/30/13 Page 14 of 16 DIR Contract No. DIR-TSO-2542 Vendor Contract No. U. Section 11. Contract Enforcement, C. Force Majeure is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows: DIR, Customer, Vendor or Order Fulfiller may be excused from performance under the Contract for any period when performance is prevented as the result of an act of God, strike, war, civil disturbance, epidemic, or court order, provided that the party experiencing the event of Force Majeure has prudently and promptly acted to take any and all steps that are within the party's control to ensure performance and to shorten the duration of the event of Force Majeure. The party suffering an event of Force Majeure shall provide notice of the event to the other parties when commercially reasonable. Subject to this provision, such non-performance shall not be deemed a default or a ground for termination. However, a Customer may terminate a Purchase Order if it is determined by the Customer that Order Fulfiller will not be able to deliver product or services in a timely manner to meet the business needs of the Customer. V. Appendix D, End User License Agreement to DIR-TSO-2542 the following applies: The following terms of Vendor's End User License Agreement shall have the same priority as the terms of this final contract document: SECTIONS HEREIN ENTITLED "LICENSE", "GENERAL LIMITATIONS", "SOFTWARE, UPGRADES AND ADDITIONAL COPIES", "PROPRIETARY NOTICES", "CUSTOMER RECORDS" AND "IDENTIFIED COMPONENTS". (Remainder of page intentionally left blank) 10/30/13 Page 15 of 16 DIR Contract No. DIR-TSO-2542 Vendor Contract No. This Contract is executed to be effective as of the date of last signature. Cisco Systems, Inc. Authorized By: Signature on File Name: Phil Lozano Title: Director of Finance Date: 5/5/14 The State of Texas, acting by and through the Department of Information Resources Authorized By: Signature on File Name: Karen Robinson Martin Zelinsky for Karen Robinson Title: Executive Director Date: 5/5/14 Office of General Counsel: _drb 5/5/14 10/30/13 Page 16 of 16 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 Action Item for City Council Meeting July 19, 2016 DATE: 6/28/2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, Interim City Manager FROM: Rudy Bentancourt, Director of Housing & Community Development RudyB@cctexas.com 361-826-3021 Approving the expenditure of Type A funds for the rehabilitation of La Armada II CAPTION: Motion to approve the action of the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation, authorizing the expenditure of $150,000 of funding to the Corpus Christi Housing Authority for the rehabilitation of La Armada II. PURPOSE: The purpose of the motion is to provide the Corpus Christi Housing Authority (CCHA) with the balance of the allocated funds for the rehabilitation of La Armada II. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: During the December 15, 2014, the Corpus Christi Housing Authority made a formal request to the Type A Board for $500,000 in funding to assist and leverage the CCHA's effort to revitalize the La Armada II Public Housing Complex. The overall project would return 93 vacant units to service, update internal plumbing and baths for the remaining 307 units, update the building facades, and re -roof the entire complex. On January 19, 2015, the Type A Board made a motion to authorize $350,000 of the $500,000 to the Corpus Christi Housing authority to support the rehabilitation of La Armada II units. The motion included that $150,000 would be provided the following year to complete the full request of $500,000. On December 14, 2015, the Corpus Christi Housing Authority made a "Progress' presentation to the Type A Board for the request of the $350,000. The request for reimbursement was approved. This motion will authorize the expenditure of the remaining balance of $150,000 to the Corpus Christi Housing Authority for the rehabilitation of La Armada II. ALTERNATIVES: None OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not Applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Not Applicable EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: This item is non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal Housing and Community Development FINANCIAL IMPACT: Fiscal Year: 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item $150,000 $150,000 BALANCE $150,000 $150,000 Fund(s): Comments: Financial Impact will be on the funding of the Type A Board funding. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the expenditure of $150,000 to the Corpus Christi Housing Authority. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of July 19, 2016 DATE: June 17, 2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, Interim City Manager FROM: Alyssa M. Barrera, Business Liaison AlyssaB@cctexas.com (361) 826 - 3356 Resolution authorizing emergency expenditure for HVAC system at the American Bank Center. CAPTION: Resolution authorizing the emergency expenditure of $70,000 for HVAC repair at the American Bank Center, which was approved by the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation on May 16, 2016. PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to ratify the City Manager's approval of waiving the bid process for an emergency expenditure to repair the HVAC system at the American Bank Center Arena. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The American Bank Center Arena's HVAC system contains two chiller units (Chiller No. 1 and Chiller No. 2). The Arena's Chiller No. 2 experienced an internal failure in May, rendering it unusable and requiring a complete overhaul. Until Chiller No. 2 is repaired, Chiller No. 1 must provide all of the cooling for the building. This presents an emergency situation because if Chiller No. 1 fails, there would be no cooling in the Arena and major parts of the Convention Center. On May 11, 2016 SMG submitted a written request for an additional $70,000 to fund this emergency repair. After receipt of this request, staff identified that the funding was actually available, so no allocation of funds was necessary; but the bidding process for the repair was to add an extensive time period before work could begin. With the approaching commencement ceremonies guaranteed to place thousands in the Arena over the coming weeks, this was considered an emergency situation. Per the City Charter, the City Manager has the authority to waive the bidding requirements for emergency purchases above $50,000. Per SMG's Management Agreement, "the City agrees to respond to any request of Operator for an Emergency Expenditures within 24 hours from receipt of the request." Emergency Expenditure is defined as "any expenditure to the extent not included within an Approved Budget and not expected by the Operator to be incurred but which is necessary to correct any condition that poses an imminent threat to public safety or material damage to the Facility." The City Manager provided written approval to proceed with the repair on May 12, 2016. On May 16, 2016, the Type A Board passed a motion approving an emergency expenditure of $70,000 for the repair of the HVAC system. The Council is now being asked to approve the action of the Type A Board. ALTERNATIVES: The alternative was to not approve the repair and extend the time that Chiller No. 1 serves the entire Arena facility, risking complete failure of the HVAC system. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: This item highlighted opportunities for improvement of processes following changes in City and SMG staff. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The City Manager has authority to waive the bidding requirements for emergency purchases above $50,000.00 as outlined in the City Charter. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Type A Board approved this emergency expenditure on May 16, 2016. FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015-2016 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $607,797.77 $607,797.77 Encumbered / Expended Amount $198,236.77 $198,236.77 This item $70,000.00 $70,000.00 BALANCE $339,561.00 $339,561.00 Fund(s): Visitors Facility Fund — Arena Maintenance / Improvements Comments: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving this emergency expenditure for Chiller 2 at the American Bank Center Arena. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution — SMG HVAC Emergency Expenditure American Bank Center Request - HVAC Emergency Expenditure City Manager Approval — HVAC Emergency Expenditure Page 1 of 2 Resolution authorizing the emergency expenditure of $70,000 for HVAC repair at the American Bank Center, which was approved by the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation on May 16, 2016. WHEREAS, The American Bank Center Arena's HVAC system contains two chiller units (Chiller No. 1 and Chiller No. 2) and Chiller No. 2 experienced an internal failure in May, rendering it unusable and requiring a complete overhaul; WHEREAS, on May 11, 2016, SMG submitted an emergency request for $70,000 to fund repairs of the HVAC system at the American Back Center; WHEREAS, the City Manager provider written approval of this emergency expenditure on May 12, 2016, so that SMG could begin the repairs in advance of commencement ceremonies occurring at that time; WHEREAS, the emergency expenditure was approved by the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation (the "Corporation") on May 16, 2016, by a motion at their regular meeting on that date; WHEREAS, the City finds that it is in the best interest of the City to approve the expenditure of funds and ensure the proper function of the HVAC system at the American Bank Center; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the findings of the City Council and its actions approving this Resolution taken at the council meeting are hereby approved and adopted. SECTION 2. That the City Council authorizes the Corporation to expend funds in the amount of $70,000 for repairs to the HVAC system at the American Bank Center. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Nelda Martinez Mayor Page 2 of 2 Corpus Christi, Texas of The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Rudy Garza Michael Hunter Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Brian Rosas Lucy Rubio Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughn AmericariBarik CENTER. arena convention center 1 Selena auditorium May 11, 2016 Mr. Ron L. Olson, City Manager 1200 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, TX 78403 Dear Mr. Olson: The American Bank Center is in need of $70,000.00 in additional Repair and Maintenance funds to repair and maintain the Arena's cooling system components. In January, 2016, the Arena's Ice skid experienced a catastrophic failure. In order to preserve the remainder of the Icerays season and to provide ice for Disney on Ice, $171,430.16 was spent to retrofit ice connections in the Arena and to install a temporary, rented chiller to make ice. After these measures, only $10,722.42 remain in the Arena's Repair and Maintenance account for this fiscal year. This month, Arena's Chiller No. 2 experienced an internal failure, rendering it unusable. A complete overhaul of Chiller No. 2 is required. The cost for this repair is estimated at $70,000.00. This presents an emergency situation because Arena's Chiller No. 1 is now providing all the cooling for the building. However, there is no backup for Chiller 1. If Chiller 1 fails, there will be no cooling in the Arena and major parts of the Convention Center. I respectfully request that you approve the additional funds so that the American Bank Center is able to provide for the comfort of our guests and staff. Thank you. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to let me know. Sincerely, m Sa General Manager American Bank Center --SMG Ronald L. Olson CITY MANAGER PO Box 9277 Corpus Christi Texas 78469-9277 Phone 361-826-3220 Fax 361-826-3839 RonOa cctexas.com www,cctcxas.com Jim Salamenta General Manager American Bank Center 1901 N. Shoreline Blvd. Ste. 100 Re: Request for Emergency Expenditure Dear Jim: I understand that one of the two HVAC units that serve the Arena needs immediate repair. Operating on one HVAC unit is not sufficient, especially because any incidents with the remaining unit would mean there is no cooling system for the Arena. Additionally, the failure of the remaining HVAC during the commencement ceremonies this weekend at the Arena would possibly "pose a threat to public safety." Our Management Agreement and the City Charter give me the ability to give you approval to proceed with an Emergency Expenditure. Under the Emergency Expenditure provisions of our Management Agreement, you have my approval to proceed with repair to the facility. Since your expenditure is over $50,000, this item will require ratification from the Type A Board and City Council, and will not be unreasonably withheld. City of Corpus Christi Cc: Buck Brice, Assistant City Attorney AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 DATE: TO: Margie C. Rose, Interim City Manager FROM: Saundra K. Thaxton, Assistant Director of Strategic Management saundra@cctexas.com, 361-826-3682 July 1,2016 Management Review of the City of Corpus Christi's Engineering Services STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name Title/Position 1. Saundra K. Thaxton Assistant Director 2. Jeff Edmonds, P.E . Director OUTSIDE PRESENTER(S): Name 1. Frank C. Brogan, P.E. Title/Position Owner Department Strategic Management Engineering Services Organization Frank Brogan Consulting BACKGROUND: Mr. Brogan will present the results of the Management Review of the City of Corpus Christi's Engineering Services. The review included a series of interviews with individuals both internal and external to City Hall, review of a significant amount of information provided by staff, and review of standard practices for many components of the engineering and construction process. Engineering Services workload, staffing, organizational structure and operating processes were also examined including its use of augmented staff. This study was conducted as part of the City's overall continuous improvement program to review and improve City operations. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: PowerPoint: Management Review of the City of Corpus Christi's Engineering Services Report: Management Review of the City Engineering Department Phase I Report FRANK BROGAN CONSULTING 200 NORMANDY AVE. SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78209 April 19, 2016 Mr. Ron Olson, City Manager City of Corpus Christi P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 Subject: Management Review of City Engineering Department -Phase I Report Dear Mr. Olson: The attached report was performed in accordance with a Contract for Professional Services dated February 8, 2016. The purpose of the Management Review was to evaluate the performance of the City Engineering Department and make recommendations to improve the efficiency and operational effectiveness of the department. A phased approach to the Management Review was agreed upon during negotiations since it was clear that many areas needing review could be fairly evaluated in a relatively short time frame while it was not clear if other areas would require more time and effort. Any areas needing further investigation were to be identified during the first phase. The decision to do any further study (i.e. Phase II) would be made by the City after a review of the Phase I report conclusions and recommendations. The majority of the areas needing review were fully evaluated and addressed in this Phase I Report. The Management Review included a series of interviews with individuals both internal and external to City Hall, review of a significant amount of information provided by staff, and review of standard practices for many components of the engineering and construction process. The Engineering Department's workload, staffing, organizational structure and operating processes were examined including its use of augmented staff. This report includes recommendations for improvements in these areas and outlines areas needing further research. I appreciate the opportunity to assist the City of Corpus Christi in this review. Sincerely, Frank C. Brogan Cc: Margie C. Rose, Deputy City Manager Saundra Thaxton, Assistant Director of Strategic Management Management Review of Engineering Services City Council Presentation July 12, 2016 Assessments: Overview • PURPOSE: •Identify gaps & improvements needed •Benchmark •Adopt best practices •Instill culture of continuous improvement • RECOMMENDATIONS: • Translated into Implementation Plan with tasks, timeline, & responsible staff • Integrate Implementation Plans into Annual Business Plans • Monitor progress of department Prior Assessments Industry Experts • FY 2011: Information Technology (IT) Competitive; $700k in cost savings • FY 2011: Fleet Competitive; "rightsizing" downsized fleet by 8% (144 vehicles) w/$2.4m projected savings over 5 yrs • FY 2012: Solid Waste No further privatization warranted; projected savings $1.2m -$2.9m over 5 yrs; First COS study • FY 2014: Fire 28 recommendations to improve organization & service delivery • FY 2016: Finance Efficiency & effectiveness evaluated including staffing levels, CAFR preparation, financial performance reporting, and internal controls against relevant risks; resulted in 99 Points for Consideration OSM • FY 2012: Municipal Court 32 recommendations to improve management processes, systems, & administrative controls • FY 2013: City Facilities Recommended comprehensive oversight of property management, facility maintenance & established first property & facility database • FY 2014: City Attorney • FY 2014: Planning • FY 2015: P -Card & Temporary Leased Worker Programs 24 & 12 recommendations, respectively Schedule Overview Feb 2016 Contract with Frank C. Brogan, P. E. Feb -Apr Field work Apr 2016 Draft report Jul 2016 Final report & City Council briefing Frank C. Brogan Consulting • Professional Engineer • 41 years experience in planning, design & construction • Port of Corpus Christi Authority, • Chief Operating Officer, (retired) • 27 years • Consulting engineer & president Maverick Engineering Company Management Review of City Engineering Services Phase 1 Report Prepared for the City of Corpus Christi by Frank Brogan Consulting July 12, 2016 6 Purpose • City Manager's process improvement • Review performance of the engineering services • Achieve maximum efficiency in city government for the citizens of Corpus Christi City Manager's Statement: "Lacked confidence in the City's ability to deliver a project on time and on budget" Objectives • Independent evaluation of engineering services • Staffing • Processes • Expectations — management & understanding Interviews • City staff (Engineering, Legal, Finance, Risk Mgmt., City Manager) • Augmented staff • Consulting engineering firms • Contractors • Former city staff • Chairman of the city Street Committee Over 50 individuals interviewed Information & Analysis • Department organizational chart • Staffing (city staff & augmented staff) • Departmental policies & procedures & improvement plans • Capital programs & bond programs • Prior studies including independent peer review by ASCE • Street committee reports • Consulting engineering contracts history • Change order history • Independent salary surveys • Industry trends & standard practices Department's Recent Improvements • New management in place about a year • Formulated list of 107 issues or areas needing improvement • Substantial number already resolved • Progress continues on remainder • Results not fully apparent — "in the field" • Will take time for results to be seen Evaluations & Recommendations • Staffing resources • Staffing organization • Salary issue • A/E consultant process • Construction process • Change orders • Engineering & administrative fees • Accountability • Potential for conflicts of interest • Reputation of the engineering services • Expectations — management & understanding Staffing Resources • Inadequate Staff Levels — Critical shortage of project managers & project engineers — Severe shortage of inspectors — No in-house design capacity — Adds to problems in design & construction process — Little or no time to work on process improvement, staff training, or research/find better solutions Staffing Resources (continued) • Use of Augmented Staff — Helpful but a "stop -gap" temporary solution — Expensive (62% over market salary/benefits for permanent) — $2.6 million for 16 mostly part-time augmented staff = 12.3 full time city equivalents (FTE's) — Not a long term solution — Does not effectively fill all the voids — Created other problems (conflicts, decision making) Staffing Resources (continued) • Excessive Turnover — Far exceeds other public & private (30% vs less than 10%) — Creates severe loss of institutional knowledge — Delays projects — Increases costs & problems on projects Organization • Need two Assistant Director positions (full time staff) — Chief Engineer — Chief of Construction • Need ability to do limited in-house design — Adds credibility to process — Adds flexibility in staffing (fill in during slow times) • Project mgrs./engineers need more construction experience • Consider rotation from design to construction (new engineers) • Silo effect versus cradle to grave project management • Co -location of construction & engineering? • Need to review long-term workload forecast Staffing Versus Workload Lowest Volume Staffing Level Question: What is Future Workload? Peak Volume Staffing Level Medium Volume Staffing Leve Variation in Bond Programs & Budget Staffing Versus Workload Peak Volume Staffing Level Medium Volume taffing Level Use Project Engrs Lowest & Managers for Volume Design Staffing Level Salary • Not competitive for engineers — 10 to 17% below public market — 10 to 20% below private market (w/o bonuses) — Major issue in finding & keeping qualified staff • Need improved recruiting effort • Need career path for engineers tied to market • Recover increased cost — Review & adjust amounts charged to projects — Reduce contingency from 10% to 7.5% after projects bids — Reduce use of augmented staff (38% cost savings) — Improved project cost control A/E Consultant Process • Selection process — Minimize number of RFQ's — annual submittal — Don't select if project is not ready to proceed — Short list committee conducts interviews — Maintain accurate database on past performance • Fee negotiations — Projects must be better defined (cost & scope) — Needs reasonable & defensible basis — Need accurate database of past fees paid — Don't use augmented staff (additional staff resources) — Negotiating staff must have credible design experience A/E Consultant Process (continued) • Contract approvals — Need to shorten processing & approval time — Consider one council reading with monthly forecast — 2.5 week rule should be shortened/modified • Project coordination — Project managers should meet on regular monthly basis with consultants — Review by city must be timely & complete Construction Process • Continue efforts to speed-up payments (increases bidding pool) • Make more timely decisions in the field (reduces down time) • Turnover in city staff is very detrimental to construction process • Process change orders more quickly • Increase inspectors • Project managers need more construction experience Construction Process (continued) • Construction schedule — Required completion time must be realistic — Balance construction efficiency with traffic control requirements — Consider value engineering proposals from contractors — Coordinate bidding dates with TXDOT — Consider labor & material shortages when planning city projects • Include designs for both concrete & asphalt pavement on all roadway projects (increases bidding pool) Change Orders • Number & costs are very reasonable — 3.8 change orders per projects — 3.14% of construction cost • Remove one "outlier" project & even lower — 2.8 change order per project — 1.34% of construction cost • Industry average — 5 change orders per project — 5% of construction cost • Create database on history • Lower 10% budget contingency to 7.5% after project bids • Approve on one city council reading Engineering Fees • Consultant engineering fees — Are the fees paid by the city too high? — Review is inconclusive — Results distorted by 2014 bond program process — Process needs improvement E n i n ee ri n Fees (continued) g g • 2014 bond program mistakes — Initial very rough estimate of project costs made in-house — These rough estimates were used to negotiate "lump-sum fees" — Consultants better defined scope & cost by 30% design — After 30% design was complete, projects were taken to voters — Fee comparison result varied according to estimate used — Total fees for total bond program • 2014 bond program avg. 13% • 2012 bond program avg. 9% E n i n ee ri n Fees (continued) g g • Lesson learned — Doing 30% design before bond vote was correct, but, — Must have a good idea of project scope & cost before negotiating lump -sum engineering fees or use alternate fee methods (i.e. percent based fee or hourly not to exceed) — Hire firm to scope & cost out projects on separate fee basis Administrative Fees • After bids are received, lower contingency to 7.5% (currently 10%) • Implement recommendation of Collier, Johnson, & Wood report • Consider revising method to flat percentage to save time and effort to prepare and process time sheets Accountability • Preliminary assessment not able to judge adequacy of accountability • Appears turnover & lack of adequate staff contribute to issue • Defer topic until adequate staff resources are in place Potential for Conflicts of Interest • No actual conflicts, but concerns • Two top positions — prohibition now in place • Fill two assistant directors augmented positions with city staff • Discontinue use of augmented staff for fee negotiations with competitors (additional staff resources) • Limit use of augmented staff inspectors (number & source) • Consider potential for appearance concerns with future contracts Reputation of Engineering • Reputation is not bad • Overloaded & understaffed • Excessive turnover • Corporate knowledge is lacking & must be rebuilt • Improvements in past year not fully recognized • Engineering & operating departments need to be partners • Staff should be encouraged & supported in making timely decisions Expectations: Management & Understanding • Large variations in size & frequency of bond programs must be minimized • Bond programs must be better developed before going to voters • Consider minimum 30% design requirement (preferably 100%) • Improve reporting & communication of progress on bond programs Conclusions & Summary • Turnover & inadequate staff resources are a critical problem — Turnover exceeds all other public & private firms — Tremendous loss of institutional knowledge — Major negative impact on efficient project execution • Augmented staff is a "stop -gap" temporary solution that is not fully effective Conclusions & Summary (continued) • Salary structure must be improved — Must increase salaries to market level — Must create an effective career path for engineers — Opportunities to reduce/redirect costs • Need to create two new assistant director positions — Chief Engineer — Chief Construction & Surveys • Processes must be improved — A/E selection & fee negotiations — City council contract approvals — Change order processing — Contractor payments Conclusions & Summary (continued) • Bond programs must be better formulated & executed — Prior planning is essential — Projects must be better defined (scope & cost) — Consider timing & size to avoid large variations in workload — Have a good portion (50%?) of projects "shovel ready" (100% designed) to allow projects to move into construction quickly after voter approval Thank you for the opportunity to serve you Frank Brogan Consulting July 12, 2016 Director's Response > Department concurs with most recommendations > Many recommendations align with initiatives already underway > Implementation Plan was developed to sequence and program recommended business process improvements > Actions will be incorporated into Annual Business Plan Implementation Plan Highlights > Implementation Plan Benefits ✓ Better Bond & CIP execution ✓ More efficient procurement activity ✓ Standardize business processes ✓ Reduce cycle times ✓ Improve staff recruiting and retention ✓ Incorporate organizational best management practices Implementation Plan Goals Mission: Execute Bond and CIP projects on time & on budget > Goal 1 —A/E Procurement Process Improvements ✓ A/E selection, negotiation & contracting > Goal 2 — Business Process Improvements ✓ Optimize internal processes ✓ Streamline external processes ✓ Develop staff ✓ Manage augmented staff Implementation Plan Goals > Goal 3 - Staff Sufficiently To Achieve Core Mission ✓ Optimize staffing plan ✓ Improve staff recruiting & retention ✓ Adjust compensation ✓ Budget & recover costs of service > Goal 4 - Improve Bond & CIP Planning & Execution ✓ Develop long-range policy > Goal 5 - Adopt Construction Best Management Practices ✓ Enhance ability to keep up with increased workload ✓ Improve business processes Sample Implementation Plan ENGINEERING SERVICES PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT RESPONSE PLAN (6 TIS P ao 01 02 03 Cel 05 0,6 07 08 sums ra row, rnra crto�aaort SUM -ASKS . 2 o a 5 s 2131 s .. 32 ..e 35 . v . 33 m 23 22 23 23 m48, bmd 47, 48, p1, 52, 6 , 63, & e.cuton(43, F 4a,51,5250,5in 8. Adopt be. management practices in the Construcbon Management 82n(1,2 5, 97 98,99,100,101,102) pe p long-range increased workload 52 I mgove buvn pr and 8 policy p p for construction 611 a CIP S Bmd execution F Program 612 Policy development 613 Policy...on& implementation n 512 Hrre quaff. Office Mag or Constmcbon 513 Use outs resources to training 5Z1 P .es ally renew and enhance cnnAmcbon buvness 522 Develop bustess process inp em plan 523 p e dab m ag nt (le bid informs on) 51, 52, 73, 76, 93, 94 43, 60,63, 92 77 ] 55131 82 84 96 N 98 99 100,101 59. 102 55,, 41, Develop internal I. of potential pro,e.s 4113 Use prelimnary engneer estimates for design neg aff estlicy enewatl refinement ofpokyCM officew of policy with City � 6126 Hticroof new ptliq 4132 Edo.. g aff on PoleY 4133 Conduct puent bNigformamn sessions See Straegy 32 DeternIne topics for traning 51, Locate sources for 5133 Contract for trainng 13 4 edukewntlu¢tra g g 5 5213 Conduct Pinternal revingage external ewolders gag p processment 5224 ALAI cder feedback 5,, Mplement ompliance with epolcedprocedures Determine a,capture asharing gaps 5232 P tacapture a. sharing plan ibon ENG ENG ENG ENG CM OFC CC ENG EENG NG ENG/HR ENG ENG ENG ENG ENG ENG ENG G ENG ENG ENG ENG ENG I II% ......... ............. M= 42 Engineering Services Assessment IMMEDIATE ACTIONS REQUIRED Current Staffing Gaps > MISSION: ✓ Execution of Bond and CIP projects on time & on budget > ISSUE: ✓ Successful execution is currently dependent on the support of many contract employees ➢ TRANSITION PLAN: ✓ Determine appropriate staffing levels ✓ Determine appropriate mix of FTE & contract staff ✓ Remove barriers to recruitment and retention ✓ Implement steps to achieve appropriate staffing levels ✓ Continue to fill permanent positions ✓ Ramp staffing levels up & down in parallel w/ work loads Engineering Services Staffing Contracts Project Management • Planning & design phase focus • Professional engineering contracts (AE) • Negotiated rates based on individual qualifications Construction Management • Construction oversight services • Procured with Request for Proposal (RFP) i • Best value procurement I• Based on individual resumes and proposed rate I.• Rates include vehicle, computer, telecom resources Benefits of Augmented Staff > Could not have kept 2012 & 2014 Bond Programs on track without it > Permitted better customer service for Client Departments > Provided experienced staff able to "hit the ground running" > Contract staffs' experience has saved time and money > Augmentation contracts are easily adaptable to demands > Hours and workforce size can be readily adjusted as demands change > Have achieved more favorable business outcomes for City CIP Projects Currently Bidding CIP Projects in Design Accomplishments with Contracted Staff Engineering Accomplishments 2015 - 2016 Street Bond Projects Completed 4 Street Bond Projects Under Construction Street Bond Projects Currently Bidding Street Bond Projects in Design CIP Projects Completed CIP Projects Under Construction 10 4 25 6 25 Service Contracting Activity in 2015 Service Contracting Activity in 2016 (as ofJuly 1) Projects Bid in 2016 (as ofJuly 1) 6 34 $100M > $100M 21 Savings in Unnecessary Project Costs >$20M FNI LG VEI UA Project Management Staff Augmentation Contract Status Services Provided VM RHSI AGCM Project Management Business Process Improvements Plan Review Project Management Project Management Construction Support Plan Review Expected Date to Reach Contract Ceiling Aug. 2016 Aug. 2016 Sept. 2016 Oct. 2016 Nov. 2016 Nov. 2016 Apr. 2017 ECMS Project Management Jun. 2017 Remedy for Current Staffing Gaps > Approve extension of Construction Inspector staffing contracts > Extend the existing Project Management staff augmentation contracts for up to one year with 2 one year options to maintain continuity on the 2012 and 2014 Bond Programs > Provide an adequate period to address compensation plan issues, recruit and train new staff Engineering Services Assessment QUESTIONS? MANAGEMENT REVIEW OF CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PHASE I REPORT (City Project No. E16245) PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS PREPARED BY FRANK BROGAN CONSULTING SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS (April 19, 2016) FRANK BROGAN CONSULTING 200 NORMANDY AVE. SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78209 April 19, 2016 Mr. Ron Olson, City Manager City of Corpus Christi P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 Subject: Management Review of City Engineering Department -Phase I Report Dear Mr. Olson: The attached report was performed in accordance with a Contract for Professional Services dated February 8, 2016. The purpose of the Management Review was to evaluate the performance of the City Engineering Department and make recommendations to improve the efficiency and operational effectiveness of the department. A phased approach to the Management Review was agreed upon during negotiations since it was clear that many areas needing review could be fairly evaluated in a relatively short time frame while it was not clear if other areas would require more time and effort. Any areas needing further investigation were to be identified during the first phase. The decision to do any further study (i.e. Phase II) would be made by the City after a review of the Phase I report conclusions and recommendations. The majority of the areas needing review were fully evaluated and addressed in this Phase I Report. The Management Review included a series of interviews with individuals both internal and external to City Hall, review of a significant amount of information provided by staff, and review of standard practices for many components of the engineering and construction process. The Engineering Department's workload, staffing, organizational structure and operating processes were examined including its use of augmented staff. This report includes recommendations for improvements in these areas and outlines areas needing further research. I appreciate the opportunity to assist the City of Corpus Christi in this review. Sincerely, Frank C. Brogan Cc: Margie C. Rose, Deputy City Manager Saundra Thaxton, Assistant Director of Strategic Management TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary 1 2. Introduction 2 3. Purpose and Objectives 3 4. Interviews, Information and Analysis 3 5. Evaluation and Recommendations 5 A. Staffing Resources 5 B. Staffing Organization 7 C. Salary Issue 9 D. A/E Consultant Process 11 E. Construction Process 14 F. Change Orders 17 G. Engineering and Administrative Fees 19 H. Accountability 20 I. Potential for Conflicts of Interest with Augmented Staff and Others 21 J. Reputation of the Engineering Department 24 K. Expectations — Management and Understanding 25 6. Conclusions — Response to City Manager's Questions 27 7. Areas Needing Further Research . 30 Appendix: A. Questions for the Engineering Competitive Review 31 B. Information Provided by the City of Corpus Christi 33 C. Engineering Services — Problem Identification/Resolution Report 34 i 1. Executive Summary: This report reflects the findings and recommendations of Frank Brogan Consulting who was retained by the City of Corpus Christi to conduct a Management Review of the City of Corpus Christi Engineering Department, evaluate its performance and make recommendations to improve the efficiency and operational effectiveness of the department. This review also considered and evaluated eight specific questions (See Appendix A — Questions for the Engineering Competitive Review) or areas of concern that were identified by the City. This report also includes a number of observations and recommendations that involve issues and changes needed both internal as well as external to the City Engineering Department. The City Engineering Department has been tasked with the execution of a major capital works program consisting of over 200 projects with an estimated cost in excess of $300 million. These projects include tax payer approved bond programs (majority for streets improvements) and a sizeable ongoing capital improvement program needed to maintain basic city services. The Engineering Department has been criticized for the slow progress made on many of these projects and for cost overruns that have required additional city funding. Because of this criticism, the City Manager's office of Strategic Management requested this study. This study included a series of interviews with over fifty individuals that work directly or indirectly for the City or who do business with the city such as construction contractors and consulting engineers. The Engineering Department's workload, staffing, organizational structure and operating processes were examined. Its use of temporary "augmented" staff was also examined. It should be noted that the City Engineering Department is operating under new management and supervision. The Director of Engineering Services was hired from the outside thirteen months ago. The Executive Director of the Public Works was promoted to this position from another department approximately sixteen months ago. These changes in management were the result of turnover that had previously occurred. They took over a program that was already in trouble and have worked diligently to implement an extensive plan (involving 107 separate problems or issues) to correct these pre-existing problems. After conducting the interviews and reviewing all the available information, it is clear that progress is being made by the individuals now in charge. Processes have been significantly improved but the results of these improvements are not yet fully apparent to everyone outside City Hall that is working on City projects. Some have noticed the improvements while others have not. It will take additional time for these results to be widely recognized. 1 The City Engineering Department has tried valiantly to execute its assigned mission but needs improvement in three main areas. These include improved staffing resources, more efficient processes and better management/understanding of the expectations placed on the Department. First, the single most important thing the City can do to continue the process of improving the performance of the Engineering Department is to improve the staffing resources available to the department. Excessive turnover, a significant number of vacant positions and the continued use of augmented staff does not provide a stable workforce with the necessary corporate knowledge required to efficiently and effectively execute the Department's assigned duties and satisfy the public's expectations. This need overshadows all other areas that need improvement. This issue must be solved in order to maintain and continue the progress that has already been made. Second, many of the city processes, external as well as internal to the department, are slow and inefficient which cause delays in execution of projects and create a high level of complaints from those doing business with the City. Some of the more frequent problem areas cited involve the difficulty in negotiating engineering fees, delays in getting contracts approved, changes in staff, changes in project scope, delays in getting timely responses to important design or construction issues and delays in payments made to contractors. Third, a better understanding and approach to managing the expectations placed on the department is needed. The public's expectation that a project will be completed within budget and within a reasonable timeframe after bond approval is entirely understandable and reasonable. Therefore this fact must be considered in how bond programs are formulated and presented to the public. Projects must be better scoped, scheduled and estimated before they are presented to the voters to prevent delays, problems and cost overruns. Some major projects require a great deal of advance planning A realistic assessment of the City's capacity to execute a bond program must also be considered when bond programs are formulated in order to satisfy the public's expectations. Additionally, once a bond issue is approved, the city needs to improve the way it communicates not only the status of the bond projects, but also the overall progress made so that the public can better understand how these programs are progressing. 2. Introduction: This report was performed in accordance with a City of Corpus Christi Contract for Professional Services — "Management Review of the City Engineering Department", with a scope of work described in Exhibit A (Proposal from Frank Brogan Consulting dated February 5, 2016). Work on a Phase I scope of work was authorized to begin on February 8, 2016. A phased approach was agreed upon as being necessary since it was clear that many areas could be fairly evaluated in a relatively short time frame while it was not clear (at the outset of negotiations) if other areas 2 would take more time and effort. Any areas needing further investigation were to be identified during the first phase. The decision to do any further study (i.e. Phase II) would be made by the City after a review of the Phase I report conclusions and recommendations. Mrs. Saundra Thaxton, Assistant Director of Strategic Management, was the designated point of contact for this study and her assistance throughout this study was most helpful and appreciated. Others providing invaluable assistance include Valerie Gray, Executive Director of Public Works, Jeff Edmonds, Director of Engineering Services and Capital Programs, Aurora Parlamas, Assistant Director of Support Services and Vickie Marsden, Business Unit Manager. Their help was also most appreciated. 3. Purpose and Objectives: The purpose of this review was to provide the City Manager with an independent evaluation of the performance of the Engineering Department and recommendations for areas needing improvement. This review is a part of the City Manager's continuing efforts to review all city departments and ensure that every effort is made to achieve maximum efficiency of city government for the citizens of Corpus Christi. The City Manager stated during an interview that he "lacked confidence in the City's ability to deliver a project on time and on budget". This candid statement clearly underscored the importance and need for this study. The City's Engineering Department has come under criticism and close scrutiny for the delays and cost overruns experienced on city projects, most notably being the bond projects approved by the voters in 2012 and 2014. The City Manager provided a detailed list of eight areas of concern (see Appendix A) that were the primary focus of this investigation. This list asked for an evaluation of: project schedules, project costs, staffing, processes, change orders, accountability, conflicts of interest and reputation. 4. Interviews, Information and Analysis: The Phase I assessment included interviews with individuals both internal and external to city hall, review of a significant amount of information provided by staff and review of standard practices for many components of the engineering and construction process. The author would like to thank all of the individuals interviewed that provided so much of their time. The author would also like to thank City staff for their assistance in gathering the large amount of data that was provided for review. Without their help this assessment would have taken much longer and not been as complete or as thorough. 3 Interviews: Interviews were held with over fifty individuals working at City Hall and those doing business with the city (i.e. contractors and engineering consultants) to get their views on how the City Engineering Department operates and where it needs improvement. These included interviews with individuals with the following connection or interface with the City: a. Full time city staff that work in the City's Engineering, Legal, Risk Management and Finance Departments and the City Manager's office. b. Contract staff working on a temporary basis in the Engineering Department. c. Consulting Engineers that design projects for the City d. Contractors that regularly bid on city construction projects e. Chairman of the current City Street Committee f. Former city staff members Information Review and Analysis: City staff provided a vast amount of information (See Appendix B) to assist in this management review. Information from other sources was also reviewed and considered in the preparation of this report. The information gained from the interviews and data provided was used to assess the performance of the Engineering department, form opinions and develop recommendations. Where applicable, data was compared against industry norms. Changes Implemented by Current Management: Under its current management and new staff, the City Engineering Department has made a number of significant improvements in the way it operates and executes projects. City staff provided a comprehensive list (See Appendix C — Engineering Services — Problem Identification/Resolution Report) that outlined over 107 problems that have been identified, describes the action already taken to address the problems and the strategy moving forward to fully resolve these problems. The problems addressed were identified and organized into three major categories: a. Administrative Problems b. Project Development Problems c. Project Execution Problems A close review of this list of problems and changes that were made shows that the Engineering Department has made substantial progress at improving its operations. It has modernized its operations, implemented more efficient processes (i e online bidding) and organized and trained 4 its staff to better accomplish its mission. It is clear that progress is being made by the individuals now in charge. Processes, procedures and personnel have been significantly improved but the results of these improvements are not yet fully apparent to everyone outside City Hall that is working on City projects. Some have noticed the improvements while others have not. It will take additional time for these results to be widely recognized. 5. Evaluation and Recommendations: A. Staffing Resources: The Engineering Department has an authorized staffing level of 73 full time employees. The Director of Engineering Services has requested this number be increased by an additional 9 full time employees for a total of 82 full time employees to properly execute the department's assigned duties. These additional positions have not been approved or funded. Of the authorized staff, currently there are 46 positions filled (63%) and 27 vacant positions (37%). Last year, City staff requested and received approval by the City Council to retain 16 outside consultants (commonly referred to as "augmented staff') at a cost of $2.6 million to fill in for some of the vacant positions and help expedite the completion of the capital and bond program projects. The augmented staff are contract employees that are paid for the hours of work they provide. Three of these sixteen outside consultants work a full forty hour week for the City. The rest work approximately 27 hours per week on City business while the remainder of their time is spent working for their full time employer at their offices on other projects. As a result, the 16 augmented staff provide a total of 12.3 full time equivalents (FTE's) for City positions. When added to the full time regular city staff, this equates to a total of 58.3 FTE positions filled thus leaving an effective vacancy rate of 20%. (Note: For comparison purposes, the preceding FTE calculations were based on a city employee being away from work six weeks a year for combined vacation, sick leave and holidays). The most serious shortage of personnel is in the ranks of the Project Engineers and Project Managers. This makes up over half (54%) of the current vacancies. Currently there are: Positions (FTE*) Authorized City Staff Augment* Vacant Project Mgrs/Engineers Percent 13 6 4.4 2.6 46% 34% 20% The use of augmented staff has helped the City get projects designed and under construction and was the only viable option at that time. They have brought experience and knowledge from the private sector which has been beneficial to the process. Without question, the City would not 5 have accomplished as much work as it has without their help. However, the use of such staff should only be viewed as a temporary and partial solution. It does not fully solve the current staff resource needs and is not a long term solution. Areas of concern regarding the current staffing situation: 1. Project Managers/Engineers still have far too many projects to manage and thus must limit their time to the most pressing duties. One project manager reportedly has over eighty projects assigned to him. As a result, with respect to Project Managers and Project Engineers, the following occur: a. Must rely on other personnel to review plans (i.e. plan reviewers). b. Not able to spend enough time monitoring consultant design progress. c. Not able to respond quickly enough to consultants questions and reviews. d. Not able to follow projects during construction. Called only for problems. e. Not enough time to always research better solutions or the latest technical developments. f. Encourages transfers to other departments where workload is less 2. Augmented staff project engineers are not at work all five days of the week 3. Augmented staff project engineers are not "there for the long term". 4. Augmented staff Project Managers and Engineers costs an average 62% more than that required to hire someone of equal skills at market level including city benefits (i.e. $258,000 per year versus $159,000 per year) based upon the same city FTE equivalent work basis mentioned above. 5. Turnover leads to a loss of corporate knowledge which increases risk of problems occurring and past mistakes being repeated. It also results in more time being taken to research issues, find solutions and make decisions. This cannot be fully made up for by the use of augmented staff. 6. Turnover and changes in project managers/engineers creates problems and delays for consultants and contractors when project directions or decisions are changed. 7. Because of turnover and the use of temporary staff, top level positions have to make decisions or perform duties best left to Project Managers/Engineers. 8. Shortages in staff resources negatively impact the Engineering Department's ability to improve processes or find better technical solutions and designs. 6 9. With an expected large volume of construction projects that will be awarded by the City this year, there is a significant lack of available construction inspectors on staff and the City will have to rely on additional augmented staff inspectors. B. Staffing Organization: The Engineering Department is organized into three separate divisions consisting of Project Management, Construction and Survey and a Support Services Division (See Appendix C). The Project Management Division is divided into functional fields of project responsibility such as streets, airport/marina, facilities/parks, and utilities. This Division develops and supervises the design of all city projects. The Construction and Survey Division (located away from City Hall) provides construction management and inspection of all city projects and some private projects involving city infrastructure such as subdivisions. This Division is also responsible for surveying of construction and property boundaries. The Support Division provides a wide variety of administrative support services such as project finance, legal review, records management, project bidding support, etc. Currently the Director of Engineering Services only has one authorized full time position (Assistant Director of Support Services) to assist in management of the three divisions. The other two divisions lack a full time authorized staff member to oversee their operation but are being overseen by two mostly full time augmented staff. Recommendations regarding the current staff organization: 1. The Director of Engineering Services needs a strong second in command (Asst. Director position) to serve as the Chief Engineer for the City of Corpus Christi. This position is currently being filled by an augmented staff person working approximately 35 hours per week. This position would directly oversee the Project Management division and be a primarily technical position. This position would free the Director from getting bogged down in technical issues such as fee negotiations, technical approaches, design review, problem resolution, etc. It is critical that this position be a full time city employee that can over time amass and maintain a significant level of corporate knowledge and guide development and growth of the engineers working for the city. This person would be the one that engineers would call if they had a problem on a project that they could not resolve with their assigned project manager. 2. The Director of Engineering also needs an experienced senior position (Asst. Director position) to serve as the Chief of Construction and oversee the Construction and Survey 7 Division. This position is currently being filled by an augmented staff person working approximately 35 hours per week. This person would ensure projects are constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications, all work is properly inspected, problems in the field are resolved promptly and that construction activities are coordinated effectively with public needs. This person would be the one that contractors would call if they had a problem on a project that they could not resolve with their assigned project inspector. 3. The Director of Engineering Services should be more of an administrative position and deal with larger issues such as reporting to and working with the City Manager, responding to City Council requests, dealing with the public, making sure that the other City departments were properly supported by Engineering, and ensuring that the Engineering Department is accomplishing its goals and objectives, etc. The Director of Engineering should be responsible for making sure that the City's longer term issues are properly addressed such as planning for future bond projects and major improvements or changes to the City's utility and operating systems. 4. The Engineering Department needs to develop the ability to do some smaller (and more frequent) design projects in-house. This will help keep staff productive if and when the project workload ever slows down. Project managers can then design projects in-house when work is slow. It also reinforces staff credibility with consultants and contractors and improves staffs ability to accurately and fairly negotiate, assess and monitor performance by outside engineers and contractors. 5. The Engineering Department's project managers and engineers need more construction experience. Several contractors remarked that City staff doesn't understand what it takes to construct a project. The Engineering Department should continue its efforts to rotate assignments between Project Management and Construction Divisions especially as new engineers are hired. 6. Due to the organizational and physical separation of the Construction Division from the Project Management Division there is a "Silo effect" where project managers are not involved in the construction process as much as they should be. This limits the feeling of being responsible for the entire project. Project managers hand off the project to the Construction Division. In the future when adequate staffing resources are provided, the Engineering Department may want to consider the "Cradle to Grave" form of project management where one person is in charge of a project from its inception all the way through design, bidding and construction. This puts one person in charge of the entire process and cuts down on the finger pointing that occurs between the groups that work in the field and those that work in the office. (Note: Before making a major organizational 8 change like this, more study and analysis is needed. A lesser approach would be to co - locate both Divisions in the same work area.) 7. At some later point, the Engineering Department should consider hiring one or two engineers that are experienced in building design, heating/cooling systems, etc. to better manage these projects. 8. The City should reevaluate its premise that since work will slow down after the current bond programs are completed the city should minimize its hiring of Engineering Department staff. All indications are that infrastructure needs will continue and the City must have sufficient resources to carefully plan and execute these programs. C. Salary Issue: The City's current compensation plan is the most significant obstacle to providing the necessary staff resources that the Engineering Department needs to carry out its assigned duties and responsibilities. The recruitment process and salaries offered to prospective employees and paid to existing staff are insufficient to attract, maintain and develop an effective staff in the Engineering Department. Recent surveys have shown that the salaries for the Engineering Department are substantially below (10 to 20%) the private sector (without bonuses) and generally well below (10 to 17%) that paid by other public agencies. In the current competitive market for project managers and engineers, the City must adjust its salary scale. The impact of the City's current compensation plan is considered to be the primary reason for the tremendous turnover in staff that the Engineering Department has experienced. Data from the City indicates that the Engineering Department lost over 30% of its remaining staff in 2015 and lost another 10% in January of this year alone. Turnover is most acute in the engineering and construction inspections positions in the department. Of the fifteen local private and public entities surveyed recently, the City is the only organization reporting an annual turnover rate in excess of 10%. This is a very serious issue that has a major negative impact on the Engineering Department. Recommendations regarding the issue of compensation: 1. Continue to improve recruiting process a. Continue to shorten the time it takes to process, rate and approve hiring requests b. Continue to advertise in national publications and professional organization websites c. Don't list salaries that are below market (i.e. step 1 salary levels) d. Continue participating in on -campus recruitment programs for graduate engineers e. Utilize professional recruiting firms for mid and upper level positions 9 f. Consider hiring bonuses and relocation expense reimbursement 2. Establish professional development and career path for engineers a. As engineers gain experience they should receive salary increases tied to market b. Professional development is essential for new graduate engineers c. Need salary incentive for younger engineers to get professional license d. Engineers should be encouraged and reimbursed for attendance at technical society meetings and conferences. Helps motivate and train staff. It also improves working relationships with the local engineering community. 3. Review and adjust salaries of existing staff a. Set at levels comparable to local and state market b. Conduct effective performance evaluations and reward performance 4. Recover increased costs a. Review and adjust amounts charged to capital projects and operating departments for services provided to properly reflect cost and value of service provided. Consider implementing a fixed percentage rate for reimbursement in lieu of time sheets. b. Lower project contingency budgeted for all projects (above $200,000 in cost) from 10% to 7.5% after bids are received. While there may be reluctance to increase salaries in one City department and not all others, it must be made clear that an effective and efficiently operated Engineering Department can and will save the City money. Project engineers, project managers and inspectors make decisions every day that greatly affect the initial cost of a project, future maintenance costs and project performance or durability. Engineering involves a great deal of individual judgement. Projects can be over -designed or under -designed, both of which are costly mistakes. When dealing with hundreds of millions of dollars in construction projects, an overlooked issue can cost millions to fix and a creative solution can also save millions. Project delays (engineering and construction) related to staffing shortages can also increase costs. The additional costs required for a reasonable pay structure is a very small percent of the city's overall construction program and is cheap insurance. There is also the impact on and protection of the public to consider. It is essential that the City pay the costs that are needed to properly staff the Engineering Department, because the alternative will be more expensive. It should be noted that the City is paying a total of $2.6 million per year for the city equivalent of 12.3 augmented full time staff which equates to an average (for all positions) of $211,400 per year. This same number of dollars could be used to hire an equivalent of 19.6 full time city employees at market value with full city benefits (overall average $132,300 salary and benefits). 10 D. A/E Consultant Process During the course of this study, one process identified that clearly needs improvement was the way the Engineering Department selects, negotiates fees and generally administers the work of various architectural and engineering (A/E) consultants that the City hires for assistance in executing various projects. A great deal of input was received from the consulting community that warrants a closer look at this process. This input generally regarded four main areas: selection, fee negotiation, contract approvals and coordination with the City during the design process. The area that was most commented upon was the way the City negotiates its fees with consultants. Under its new management, the Engineering Department has been working to correct past problems and improve this process. Recommendations for the A/E Selection Process: 1. Continue efforts to minimize the number of Request for Qualifications (RFQ's) that are issued to reduce the time and expense that consultants incur when soliciting work from the City. a. Issue annual RFQ for all anticipated projects grouped into major categories such as streets, water and waste water, airport and marina. b. Let consultants submit one statement of interest indicating which projects they feel most qualified and interested in performing. c. Only issue individual RFQ's for very specialized or very large projects. d. Utilize standard industry form SF330 for A/E qualifications and selection process to simplify and standardize the submittal requirements. 2. Have the same committee that reviews the RFQ submittals and prepares the short list also conduct the actual interviews. In this way, all members of the committee are equally briefed and informed on each team's qualifications. The Project Manager or Engineer that will be responsible for the project must be a member of this committee. 3. Wait on short listing and interviewing firms for a particular project if that project is not ready to proceed. No need to go through the process if a project is not ready to proceed. This will also ensure that the project manager for the City and the Consultant project staff are the same individuals that will be working on the project. 4. Maintain accurate records of past performance by consultants on City projects to include: ability to meet submittal schedules, number and cost of change orders required to correct any deficiencies or problems with design. This information could be included in the fee negotiation data base discussed below. 11 Recommendations for the A/E Fee Negotiations Process: 1. Projects must be better defined and costs estimated before fee negotiations begin. 2. The Engineering Department needs a reasonable and defensible basis for fee negotiations. 3. Some consultants reported having to go through five or six iterations of fee negotiations before finally agreeing on fees. This is excessive, delays projects and highlights the current problem. 4. Since State law prohibits bidding of engineering services, the Engineering Department should develop and maintain an accurate and searchable data base of fees paid on past projects to be able to compare fees paid on other similar projects and use this data for future fee negotiations. This information should include: a. Type and size (construction cost) of projects b. Dates when the work was performed c. Name of A/E firm performing the project and the name of their project manager d. Name of the Engineering Department's project manager e. Total costs for basic services, total cost for special services and combined total f. Number of drawings per project and average cost per sheet for basic services g. Total number of hours spent per project for basic services h. Average man hour cost overall for basic services i. Percent Fee calculations based on cost of basic service, special services and total costs divided by construction costs. 5. Personnel assigned to negotiate fees should have credible design experience to understand what it takes to perform the requested services. 6. The Engineering Department should not use Augmented Staff to negotiate engineering fees when it involves one competitor negotiating a fee with another competitor. This creates a potential conflict of interest and adversarial relationship when one competitor negotiates fees with another competitor. 7. The Project Budget and estimated construction cost must be clearly identified when negotiating engineering fees. If such costs are not known, then the Engineering Department should continue to use a time and expense form of contracting to better scope the project before a lump sum fee for design services is negotiated. The estimated project budget and construction costs should be clearly stated in every design contract. It is understood that current management has implemented this process. 12 8. Continue efforts to adopt an industry standard contract form published by the Engineers Joint Contracts Document Committee (EJCDC) with slight modifications. These documents are widely used by public agencies and represent a fair and balanced contract that incorporates the latest and best thinking in contract relations among all parties. 9. Continue to maximize the use of Master Services Agreements with individual service orders to reduce contract negotiation and review time. 10. Consider a different project definition and scope documents for non -roadway type projects that will be more applicable to other types of projects. 11. The Engineering Department should continue its consideration of contracting with engineering consultants using hourly rate charges with a "not to exceed fee cap" as soon as it has sufficient staff resources to more closely monitor the progress of its design consultants. This method has the potential to save money on future projects and reduce the time it takes to negotiate fees. Recommendations for the A/E Contract Approvals: 1. The City and the Engineering Department need to find a way to speed up the contract approval process for the larger contracts. The Engineering Department has done this for the smaller contracts which are more within their control. All of the consultants interviewed complained of the lengthy process it takes to negotiate and get final authorization to begin work. There were reports of it taking three to six months or even longer to get the larger design contracts approved. 2. The City should adopt an electronic signature approval process (i.e. DocuSign) to speed approvals and avoid documents getting lost. Currently project managers have to physically track down documents to find out where they are in the approval process thus wasting valuable time. For contracts below $50,000 consider using a system tied to e- mail where an individual can select a button to approve and that approval is automatically entered into the City's purchasing and accounting system. 3. Have standard guidelines and documents in place for Risk Management and Legal so that if standard guidelines and documents are followed and contracts are below a certain level, review by these departments is not needed or at least can be expedited. 4. Reduce the number of times a contract must be presented to the City Council. If a project has been approved by the voters (bond program) or is listed in the approved capital budget and falls below a certain threshold then it would appear reasonable and legal to 13 only have to present it once to City Council under the emergency provision granted in the City Charter. This would not only shorten the approval time but also save critically short staff time. 5. Reduce the time requirement that an agenda item be submitted "in final form" with all signatures two and a half weeks before an agenda item is scheduled for Council action. Let supporting signature approvals occur while project is in the two and a half week waiting period before Council action. 6. In lieu of the future agenda posting requirement and to ensure the Council is adequately briefed on upcoming contracts, consider a monthly project status and forecast report that is sent to each council person advising them of current status and upcoming project agenda items. Recommendations for A/E Project Coordination: 1. The Engineering Department's project managers and project engineers should meet on a regular basis to review project progress. This should be done at a minimum on a monthly basis and more often when critical issues are being decided. This is in addition to the regular submittal schedules currently used by the Engineering Department. 2. When projects are submitted for review (i.e. 30%, 60%, 90% or 100%) it is imperative that timely responses are provided by not only the Engineering Department but also the Operating Departments that are involved with the project. It was pointed out that city contracts typically include a two week period for these reviews but it typically takes much longer and many times responses to questions are not complete. Each Operating Department should identify their representative for each project before a project is started and this representative must commit to providing responses on the agreed schedule. E. Construction Process During the course of this Phase I study, interviews were held with four contracting companies that bid on various projects for the city. These included Hass Anderson, Bay Ltd, Clark Pipeline Services and Ray -Tec. They provided some very valuable insight into the problems and difficulties they encounter when working on city projects. All recognized and commented on the shortage of adequate staff resources and excessive turnover in the Engineering Department. The contractors stated that their most pressing needs for a successful project were related to four key areas: getting paid on time, having decisions made quickly in the field, processing change orders quickly and reducing down time. They also made other observations and recommendations for improvements in the construction process. 14 Regarding the need for prompt payment, there was a difference of opinion on the issue of the city taking too long to pay its contractors. Some reported the city took as long as two to three months to get paid, while others stated that they were paid in a reasonable amount of time (less than 30 days). The Engineering Department has increased its efforts and improved its processes (i.e. electronic payments) to speed up payments in the recent past. This is an important issue that does affect the number of contractors that are able to work for the city and offer competitive bids. The larger contractors have the financial resources to pay their subcontractors as the work is performed and not make them wait until the contractor is paid. The smaller contractors typically cannot do this and are forced to use a "pay when paid" policy of paying their subcontractors which is a problem that limits the number of subcontractors able to work for the city. Most subcontractors need to be paid very quickly (i.e. weeks instead of months) for their work. This is an area that the Engineering Department should continue to monitor and ensure the payment process is as quick and efficient as possible. The other three needs expressed by the contractors all have one common element and that regards the time it takes the city to make a decision. Contractors talked about excessive delays in getting decisions made in the field such as when utility conflicts are discovered. The city inspectors are sometimes able to make a decision but other times have to wait until someone else such as the city project manager, the design consultant or someone from the utility departments are called in to look at the problem. They mentioned that change orders take too long to process which some attributed to the city having one person assigned to approve all change orders. The impact of delays in making these decisions can sometimes require the contractor to halt work and wait thus incurring down time and added expense for labor and equipment. These collective delays add time and cost to a contractors project which they must anticipate and factor in when they bid on future city projects. The Engineering Department has implemented processes to improve this response time. There were some other observations and recommendations that the contractors made which are worth noting. They said that the staffing shortage and turnover was very detrimental to their construction projects because it added uncertainties, delays and costs to their projects. They commented that the city inspectors were spread too thin and had too many projects to inspect. Some commented on inefficient processes taking too long and cited examples of it taking 90 days from bid opening to get final contract approval and notice to proceed, which far exceeds other public entities. Most were concerned about labor and material shortages, due to the hot construction market, affecting their ability to bid on future city projects. Two of the contractors remarked that they were not able to compete effectively on city road projects where asphalt pavement was specified because there are only two suppliers of hot mix asphalt in Corpus Christi and they are both owned or controlled by two local contractors. They recommended that the City design and bid all roadway projects with asphalt and concrete pavement options to get more 15 competitive bids. They also commented on the inefficiencies and added costs incurred in the construction processes when too many traffic flow sequences were imposed on the various projects. Findings: There are many areas where the city can help improve the construction process and get more contractors interested in bidding on city projects Recommendations regarding the Construction Process: 1. The Engineering Department needs additional staff resources including inspectors 2. Turnover must be minimized to achieve a stable workforce 3. Corporate knowledge must be rebuilt 4. City Manager and top departmental personnel need to reach out to construction community and build better working relations 5. Continue efforts to speed up contractor payments - provide faster review of work completed, pay amounts not in dispute, and inform contractors of areas of disagreement. 6. Reduce the time it takes to get contracts awarded — Consider approval with one city council reading under the emergency provisions for projects already approved by the voters and included in the budget 7. Reduce the time it takes to process and approve change orders. Consider approval with one city council reading under the emergency provisions 8. Continue efforts to provide Project managers with more construction experience by rotating assignments or using "Cradle to Grave" form of project management. 9. Prepare longer term (i.e. six months) forecast of future city project bids and coordinate dates with other public agencies such as TxDot to avoid schedule conflicts 10. Publish bidding results within 24 hours of bid opening, even if preliminary results. 11. Continue efforts to make sure construction schedules are reasonable to avoid contractors having to include liquidated damages in their bid and hope they get more time approved 12. Continue efforts to make sure required construction sequencing for traffic control purposes is carefully balanced with contractors work efficiency. Having to fully complete street segments causes multiple stops and starts in utility work. 13. Improve accuracy of design plans and completeness of underground utility information (varies with design consultants, too much reliance on "contractor to verify") 14. Improve design plans by deleting standard details that are not used on the project, only include those that are to be used. 15. Continue efforts to improve consistency of inspections and quality standards 16 16. Review and revise city specs as needed to include acceptable "industry standard" construction tolerances — terms such as "line and grade" for utility purposes are subjective and open to interpretation 17. Implement efforts to build a partnership between the City and its contractors 18. Continue to include equivalent roadway sections for both asphalt and concrete pavements to increase pool of bidders. 19. Ensure projects are promptly closed out when completed. 20. Consider letting some engineering consultants perform construction phases services on some projects. 21. Consider co -locating the engineering and inspection departments F. Change Orders Change orders on construction projects are very common and a necessary part of the construction process. Their need and use must be fully understood and carefully managed. In a perfect world, plans would always be 100% accurate, project scopes would never change and conditions in the field would always be the same as they are on paper. If this were always the case there would be no need for change orders. But this is not reality. It is not possible to be perfect, but it is possible to do a very good to excellent job. Project managers should always strive to minimize the need for change orders by having projects well scoped at the beginning and designed properly with the best information. From an industry perspective, conditions in the field are often different from what is shown on construction drawings. The location of private utilities and pipelines installed by others is sometimes not well recorded. Changes in utility systems can be made during repair projects and this information may not be properly recorded. In older sections of the city, older infrastructure (some abandoned) dating back many decades ago is not well documented or even known. Even with a comprehensive survey to locate underground utilities which the City Engineering Department is currently doing, some utilities may not be discovered. Ground conditions can also vary from what soil borings indicate. During the course of this study, information on projects currently in progress and recently completed were examined to determine if there was an excessive use or cost of change orders. A construction status report dated 2/11/16 on "Projects in Progress" indicates that on 41 projects currently in progress with a construction value of $344 million, there were a total of 106 change orders with a combined total of $8.44 million. This represents an average of 2.6 change orders per project and an average value (percent of construction) of 2.45%. 17 If you remove two "outlier" projects (Bayfront Development and CC International Airport Runway/Taxiway projects), the numbers are significantly lower. The total drops to 74 change orders with a total value of $4.25 million for an average of 1.9 change orders per project and an average value of 1.3%. The scope of this first phase did not permit a closer examination of these two projects but it was reported that the change orders for the CC International Airport project were related to changes in FAA regulations. The City also provided another report dated 2/11/16 on "Projects in Close Out" which indicates that on 10 recently completed projects with a total value of $57.5 million, there were 38 change orders with a combined value of $1.81 million. This represents an average of 3.8 change orders per project with an average value of 3.14%. If one "outlier" project (Williams Drive) is removed, the average number drops to 2.8 change orders per project and an average value of 1.34%. The scope of this first phase did not permit a closer examination of this project. For comparison purposes an average of five (5) change orders per project with a total value of 5% of original contract is quite common in the construction industry on multi-million dollar roadway and utility projects. Findings: From a review of the information provided by the City, the number and cost of change orders encountered on City projects is well within commonly accepted industry standards and considered very good. Recommendations for Change Order Process: 1. Continue to maintain a searchable data base on change order history. This information should include: a. Type and size (construction cost) b. Date when project was constructed c. Contractor and Engineer d. Categorize by causation (i.e. design error, inadequate research of underground utilities, undocumented and unforeseeable site conditions, change in project scope, change in construction scheduling, etc.) 2. Continue to examine this database for trends and use in future contract selection/award process. 3. After bids are received, lower the 10% budget contingency used in the City's capital program to 7.5% on future projects to reflect the lower amount used for change orders. 18 4. Consider the use of a sliding scale of contingencies for change orders where a larger percentage is used for smaller projects and a smaller percentage is used for larger projects. G. Engineering and Administrative Fees This study examined the amounts budgeted and paid by the City for project contingency, administrative, and engineering costs which collectively make up a significant share (25%) of the amount budgeted for each project. On $300 million in projects, this represents a significant cost of $75 million. Currently the City budgets 10% for project contingencies. Typically contingencies are established to provide funding for potential changes in project costs. These changes can occur as projects are more fully scoped and designed, costs of materials and labor increase and as change orders occur. However, the amount needed for project contingencies varies over the course of a project. A larger contingency is needed when projects are first conceived. But as projects develop in design and are bid, a lower contingency is needed. The City also budgets various amounts for administrative costs related to in-house services such as construction inspections, contract administration, engineering services and printing. From the sample reports provided, this appears to equal 7% of the amount budgeted for each project. A report prepared by the accounting firm of Collier, Johnson and Woods, P.C. dated May 13, 2014 indicated that the multiplier (3.1768) used by the City to charge employees time and costs to projects results in a charge that exceeds the actual costs incurred and made several recommendations for tracking actual costs and adjusting the amounts budgeted for project administrative costs. Current management is tracking actual costs based on timesheets and recovering necessary costs. At this point, the scope of the first phase does not permit closer examination and further recommendation. A thorough analysis of this issue may justify part or all of the additional funding needed to provide the staffing resources required by the Engineering Department. Engineering costs are typically the cost the City incurs when it hires outside consulting firms to design its projects. There was a significant amount of discussion during the interviews regarding whether or not the fees charged to the city were excessive. The Engineering Department provided summaries of fees paid to consultants on the 2012 and 2014 bond projects for use in this study. Copies of consultant contracts and city agenda information were also provided. This data was reviewed, analyzed and compared to other industry standards. 19 Findings: The results are inconclusive and further research is needed to determine if the fees paid on prior bond programs were reasonable or excessive. Recommendations for Engineering and Administrative fees: 1. After bids are received, lower the 10% budget contingency used in the City's capital program to 7.5% to reflect the lower amounts used for change orders. 2. Implement the recommendations of the Collier, Johnson & Woods report. 3. Conduct a more thorough analysis of the engineering fees paid on past city projects to determine if fees are excessive or in line with industry standards. H. Accountability Accountability was one of the City Manager's eight areas of concern (see question #4 in Appendix A — Questions for the Engineering Competitive Review). Specifically it was stated that "There is an impression that there was too much finger pointing when projects go badly". It further asked if there was enough accountability in the department, who was held accountable and can practices be improved. During the interviews, there were conflicting reports of who caused what problems on two city projects. Some design engineers blamed the contractors. Some contractors blamed the design engineer. Some blamed City staff. Some blamed problems on decisions made by former city staff that have since left. It is not known at this time if this is a frequent occurrence on city projects or an isolated issue. But only two projects (both 2012 bond projects) were mentioned when this topic was discussed. There was not enough time budgeted and information available during this Phase I study to make a final, fair and accurate assessment of this issue with regard to these two projects. Further study of this topic may be covered during a later Phase II assignment or departmental staff may be able to address this concern. However, from the preliminary information gathered it appears that if there is a lack of accountability it is due to a lack of adequate staff resources. Staff may be too busy solving the day to day problems that arise and don't have enough time to decide who really made what mistakes and hold them appropriately accountable. In some cases the problems that arise can be attributed to a collective series of decisions or events that occurred which are interrelated and cloud the issue of proper accountability. 20 Findings: Preliminary information does not adequately determine if there is a lack of accountability in the Engineering Department. It does appear that the turnover in city staff and lack of adequate staff time to fully monitor projects, investigate problems and take appropriate action is a contributing factor. This appears to be a past and present issue. Recommendations: 1. Engineering Department staff may be better able to answer this concern 2. Defer this topic until adequate staff resources are restored to implement corrective action. I. Potential for Conflicts of Interest with Augmented Staff and others: The Engineering Departments significant use of augmented staff has raised questions about the potential for conflicts of interest. As previously mentioned, the Engineering Department utilizes 16 augmented staff at all levels of the department. Over 50% of the Project Managers and Project Engineers are augmented staff. Many of these augmented staff are employed full time by local consulting engineering firms but work a significant portion of their time at the City. Other augmented staff are independent contract staff with no outside firm affiliation. The question regarding a potential for a conflict of interest mainly centers on the augmented staff that work for the outside consulting engineering firms. These employees work both inside and outside of City Hall. Six of these are registered professional engineers licensed in the State of Texas and are subject to a code of ethics holding them to "the highest standards of honesty and integrity". It should be noted that the Texas Board of Professional Engineers actively and aggressively investigates all complaints of improper behavior by licensed engineers. The potential for conflicts varies according to the duties given the augmented staff but generally increases at the higher capacity at which the augmented staff serves. The concern is that they may see or do something while working for the City that gives their full time employer a competitive advantage over their competitors. Or they may purposely, to advance their own firm, make some decision or action that is detrimental to one of their competitors. No evidence has been presented or observed that indicates that either of these have taken place. The Engineering Department is aware of this potential and has created certain processes to guard against any such conflicts. These include the creation of policies and procedures that "build a firewall" around such augmented staff. A firewall is an information barrier that is erected to prevent exchanges or communications that could lead to a conflict of interest. The Engineering Department has executed agreements with the augmented staff that identifies any projects they 21 are working on outside of City Hall that might be a conflict when they are working inside City Hall and further outlines a plan of action for dealing with such projects. Unfortunately, this firewall forces the Director of Engineering Services or other city staff, whose time is already in short supply, to perform and manage certain tasks that the augmented staff being "firewalled" are not able to do. This reduces to some degree the effectiveness of the augmented staff. One area of concern was the current department organizational chart lists two senior level positions (Asst. Director) being held by augmented staff from one firm. One serves as the Chief Engineer (Assistant Director for Project Management) and the other serves as the Chief of Construction (Assistant Director of Construction and Surveys). No evidence was discovered that would indicate that either of the individuals holding these positions act in any way other than in the best interest of the City. The Director of Engineering Services has built firewalls around these two individuals to guard against any conflicts. But there is an appearance that you have one firm in charge of all City projects even though total responsibility is vested in the Director of Engineering Services. This may be fine if that is all that firm does. But to the degree that the City contracts with this same firm on future projects could raise questions or concerns about potential conflict of interests or the appearance of one that must be carefully considered. The Engineering Department is aware of this issue and has precluded this firm from participating on future city projects while serving in this current capacity. Another potential area for a conflict of interest that was discussed involves hiring consulting engineering firms to design city projects that are adjacent to or connected with a private development on which the same engineering firm is also employed. An example of this would be if the City hires the same engineering firm to design a public roadway leading up to a private development. The City could find itself having to resolve a design or construction issue with the developer but having to rely on the same consulting firm to advise the city of the merits of an issue when that consulting firm represents both sides. The consulting firm is required to notify both parties of any potential conflicts in advance, but the City should take note of all such conflicts and consider them in selecting or awarding any contracts. Another area of concern involves the use of augmented staff to negotiate engineering fee contracts with their competitors. This is occurring due to a shortage of staff resources. There is no indication that augmented staff are involved with negotiating engineering fees with their full time employer. However the use of augmented staff for fee negotiations is not a good idea when it occurs between two competitors. Another area of concern is the use of augmented staff inspectors that work for one of the local consulting engineering companies. If augmented staff inspectors inspect work designed by their own full time employer there can be a concern that they may not be impartial when deciding if a problem in the field is related to an engineering mistake made by their employer or 22 is a problem related to construction quality. This is normally not a problem and is common for consulting firms to provide construction inspections as a part of their overall services. However, city staff reported a problem with this issue on two prior projects and does not allow this. Also, if augmented staff inspectors are called to inspect work designed by their competitors there can also be a concern. No evidence was found to indicate that any inspectors acted inappropriately and this is considered to be much less of an issue. However several consulting firms did express concern about this issue with the City's plans to increase the use of augmented staff inspectors for the upcoming surge in construction projects. There could be other areas of potential conflict of interest but which were not fully reviewed in this study. Other areas could possibly include any "moonlighting" of city staff working for outside contractors or engineers which might affect their decisions. This subject was not part of this study, was not explored in any of the interviews and no mention was made of this by any of the people interviewed. The City has a policy that addresses this issue. Findings: 1. No evidence of an actual conflict of interest was found 2. The Department's use of augmented staff requires firewalls and forces shifting of work to avoid conflicts. Recommendations regarding Potential Conflicts of Interest Concerns: 1. Create and fill two Assistant Director positions with full time city staff 2. Discontinue the use of augmented staff for fee negotiations with competitors as soon as sufficient staff resources are provided 3. Hire additional full time city inspectors and limit the use of augmented staff inspectors to peak work load situations 4. Consider sourcing augmented inspectors from a firm not engaged in designing any projects for the City 5. Continue to ensure that all augmented staff have firewall agreements 23 J. Reputation of the Engineering Department: The Engineering Department is widely viewed by those inside and outside of City Hall as being a department that has good leadership but is tremendously overloaded and understaffed to the point that they cannot get all of their work done. This overshadows all other opinions about the department. The following is a recap of frequent comments made during the interviews which best illustrates the reputation of the Engineering Department: 1. Good people trying to do an impossible job 2. Things have improved in the last six to twelve months 3. On the verge of collapse if one or two key people leave 4. Just need more people 5. Turnover is killing them 6. The City doesn't pay enough to hire anyone 7. Project Managers are producing but are overloaded and totally stressed out. 8. Not a desirable work environment 9. People are afraid to make decisions 10. Takes forever to get a decision made 11. People aren't recognized or rewarded for their hard work 12. Constantly interrupted by City Council requests 13. Some degree of conflict exists between Engineering and Operating departments 14. Need more construction experience Findings: The Engineering Department does not have a bad reputation. Their reputation is that they are trying their best to get the job done, but don't have the necessary resources to do it properly. Despite these shortages, current management has made numerous improvements in the last twelve months to improve their processes and hire new staff. Recommendations for Engineering Department's Reputation: 1. The Department must be provided the necessary staff resources 2. Turnover must be minimized to achieve a stable workforce 3. Use of augmented staff should be more strategically planned to accommodate peak workload periods. Consider a longer term (i.e. three to five year) contract arrangement to maximize efficiency and effectiveness. 24 4. Corporate knowledge must be rebuilt by acquiring and maintaining a stable workforce. 5. Engineering and Operating Departments must be partners 6. Staff should be encouraged and supported in making timely decisions 7. Professional growth should be supported and encouraged by city personnel and compensation policies. K. Expectations — Management and Understanding: A better understanding and approach to managing expectations placed on the Engineering Department is needed. The public's expectation that a project will be completed within budget and within a reasonable time frame after bonds are approved and the City Council approves a budget is entirely understandable and reasonable. Therefore this fact must be considered in how bond programs and budgets are formulated and presented. Information on overall progress must also be properly conveyed to ensure that the public is well informed. Projects must be better scoped, scheduled and cost estimated before they are presented to the public for approval (i.e. bond programs) or to the City Council for budget approval in order to ensure accuracy. The Engineering Department should continue its current efforts to do this. Ideally all projects should be fully permitted, designed and "shovel ready" so that projects could move directly into the construction phase after voter or budget approval. But this would require that the City prioritize future projects and budget funds for project development (i.e. permitting, land acquisition and design) well in advance of voter or budget approval because of the massive number of needed infrastructure projects. Also project development must be "current" as construction costs can become out of date and infrastructure conditions can change over time. Alternatively and at a minimum, projects should be preliminarily designed (i.e. 30%) or a Preliminary Engineering Report prepared so that all major project features and costs are known and permitting and land acquisition needs are identified before projects are presented for voter or budget approval. There should also be consideration given to the City's capacity to execute a bond program when formulated. Large changes in the size and timing of bond programs complicates the process of executing projects and places great strains on staff resources. The City should endeavor to have regular (i.e. every two to three years) and manageable sized bond programs to minimize the impact this has on staff resource planning For example, a $50 million bond program every two years would be much more efficiently executed than a $125 million bond program every five years. This could help minimize the perception that projects take too long to complete. 25 Information on project status must also be properly conveyed so that the public can not only see how their particular projects of interest are progressing but also see the progress being made on the overall program of bond and budgeted projects. Currently, staff provides regular reports listing the status of each project. These reports could be enhanced by providing total program information using basic metrics such as number of projects designed, projects bid, projects constructed and dollars spent over time. Staff should be encouraged and supported to seek out and give presentations at community gatherings and various organization meetings (i.e. civic club lunch programs) to convey program progress and answer questions. Staff is currently working on this issue. Recommendations regarding Managing Expectations: 1. Continue the process of hiring one or two engineering firms to properly define, scope and cost projects before A/E selection and fee negotiation. This will give a more reasonable basis on which to negotiate fees and avoid some of the Bond 2014 fee problems. 2. Or continue the alternative process of making tentative A/E selection and have them prepare project scope and cost estimate on an hourly not to exceed basis before negotiating final design fees. 3. Projects should be at least 30% (preferably 100%) designed before being presented for final funding approval (bond or budget approval). Alternatively, a Preliminary Engineering Report can be prepared. 4. Large variations in bond program timing and size should be minimized. 5. Recommend City Council adopt a policy on how future bond programs are formulated and prepared. For example, if a $10 million roadway project is "expected" to be completed within two years after voter approval, then the project must be fully designed, permitted and right of way acquired (i.e. "shovel ready") before the project is presented to the voters. This advance work can take up to two years to complete. Further recommend City staff implement processes to execute this policy. 6. Progress reports should include total program progress as well as individual project progress over time using basic summary metrics 7. Provide additional staff resources so that staff can give more programs at various civic groups and organization meetings 26 6. Conclusions — Responses to City Manager's Questions The majority of these concerns were previously discussed in Section 5 above. A brief summary of the answers to these questions and areas of concern are noted below in bold italics with referral to prior report sections where these issues are more fully discussed: Concern #1: Question #1.a: Answer #1.a: Question #1.b: Answer #1.b: Question #1.c: Answer #1.c: There is an impression that works gets bottlenecked in Engineering, that projects are not completed in a timely fashion, and that work generally moves too slowly. Is that true? Not entirely, the 2014 bond projects appear to be moving faster than the 2012 bond projects If it is true, what is causing the problem? Inadequate staff resources, excessive turnover, loss of corporate knowledge and slow city processes (See Section 5.A K) If it is true, how can it be fixed? Make salaries competitive, acquire adequate staffing, minimize turnover, continue efforts to speed up all (internal and external) city processes for contract negotiations, reviews and approvals (See Section 5.A -K) Concern #2: Question #2.a: Answer #2.a: Question #2.b: Answer #2.b: Because of the impressions that work moves too slowly, there are questions about whether the department has the right processes to get the work done correctly. Does the department have effective processes in place? Yes. (See Section 5.A K) Can they be improved? How? Yes, (See Section 5.A K) Concern #3: Because of the impression that work moves too slowly, there is a question about whether staff is competent to do the work right and whether there is enough staff to do the volume of work assigned to the department. Question #3.a: Do we have qualified and competent staff? 27 Answer #3.a: Question #3.b: Answer #3.b: The staff generally as a group appears qualified and competent. However, Phase I Study did not evaluate the performance of individual staff members. Do we have enough staff? No. There is a tremendous shortage of city staff and the use of augmented staff is a short term stop gap solution that does not provide the long term stability on which the department can grow and operate most effectively. (See Section 5.A K) Concern #4: Question #4.a: Answer #4.a: Question #4.b: Answer #4.b: There is an impression that we have too many change orders on projects? Do we have too many change orders? No, the overall number and cost for change orders are very reasonable and well within industry standards (See Section 5.F - Findings) If so, how can they be better managed? Change order process can be improved (See Section 5.F - Recommendations) Concern #5: There is an impression that there is too much finger -pointing when projects go badly. Question #5.a: Answer #5.a: Question #5.b: Answer #5.b: Question #5.c: Answer #5.c: Question #5.d: Answer #5.d: Question #5.e: Answer #5.e: Is there enough accountability in the department? Results are inconclusive, more investigation is needed (See Section 5.H) Does the department take responsibility when it should? Results are inconclusive, more investigation is needed (See Section 5.H) Are contractors held appropriately accountable? Results are inconclusive, more investigation is needed (See Section 5.H) Are design engineers held appropriately accountable? Results are inconclusive, more investigation is needed (See Section 5.H) How can these practices be improved? More investigation is needed (See Section 5.H) 28 Concern #6: Question #6.a: Answer #6.a: Question #6.b: Answer #6.b: Question #6.c: Answer #6.c: There is an impression that there are conflicts of interest within the department. An example is an augmented staff consultant, working within the department and still competing for contracts issued by the department. Do we have this or other conflicts of interest in the department? No evidence of an actual conflict of interest was found If so, how do we correct the problem? (See Section 5.1) If not, how do we correct the false impression? Make it clear to all that the two top augmented staff members are prohibited from competing on any future contracts while serving in their current position Concern #7: There is an impression that projects cost too much and that engineering and administrative costs of projects are too high. Question #7.a: Answer #7.a: Question #7.b: Answer #7.b: Question #7.c: Answer #7.c: Are the impressions true? Generally not. Some records on engineering costs were found to be incorrect which has created a wrong impression. See Section 5.G -Findings and Recommendations If so, how do we fix it? (See Section 5.G- Findings and Recommendations) If not, how do we correct the false impression? (See Section 5.G — Findings and Recommendations) Concern #8: There is an impression that the department has a bad reputation. Question #8.a: Answer #8.a: Does the department have a bad reputation? The Department does not have a bad reputation. It has a reputation of being tremendously overloaded and understaffed. 29 Question #8.b: Answer #8.b: Question #8.c: Answer #8.c: If so, how do we fix it? (See Section 5.J -Findings and Recommendations) If not, how do we correct the false impression? (See Section 5.J -Findings and Recommendations) 7. Areas Needing Further Research As mentioned in the Introduction, a phased approach was agreed upon as being necessary since it was clear that many areas could be fairly evaluated in a relatively short time frame while it was not clear (at the outset of negotiations) if other areas would take more time and effort. Any areas needing further investigation were to be identified during the first phase. The decision to do any further study (i.e. Phase II) would be made by the City after a review of the Phase I report. The following areas are considered incomplete and need further evaluation by city staff or by a Phase II study: 1. Competency of individual staff members 2. Evaluation of Engineering fees charged by engineering consulting firms 3. Accountability issues regarding staff, consulting engineers and contractors 30 Appendix A — Questions for the Engineering Competitive Review The following questions were provided by Ron Olson, the City Manager of Corpus Christi: 1. There is an impression that works gets bottlenecked in Engineering, that projects are not completed in a timely fashion, and that work generally moves too slowly. a. Is that true? b. If it is true, what is causing the problem? c. If it is true, how can it be fixed? 2. Because of the impressions that work moves too slowly, there are questions about whether the department has the right processes to get the work done correctly. a. Does the department have effective processes in place? b. Can they be improved? How? 3. Because of the impression that work moves too slowly, there is a question about whether staff is competent to do the work right and whether there is enough staff to do the volume of work assigned to the department. a. Do we have qualified and competent staff? b. Do we have enough staff? 4. There is an impression that we have too many change orders on projects? a. Do we have too many change orders? b. If so, how can they be better managed? 5. There is an impression that there is too much finger -pointing when projects go badly. a. Is there enough accountability in the department? b. Does the department take responsibility when it should? c. Are contractors held appropriately accountable? d. Are design engineers held appropriately accountable? e. How can these practices be improved? 6. There is an impression that there are conflicts of interest within the department. An example is an augment staff consultant, working within the department and still competing for contracts issued by the department. a. Do we have this or other conflicts of interest in the department? b. If so, how do we correct the problem? c. If not, how do we correct the false impression? 31 7. There is an impression that projects cost too much and that engineering and administrative costs of projects are too high. a. Are the impressions true? b. If so, how do we fix it? c. If not, how do we correct the false impression? 8. There is an impression that the department has a bad reputation. a. Does the department have a bad reputation? b. If so, how do we fix it? c. If not, how do we correct the false impression? 32 Appendix B — Information Provided by the City 1. Organizational Baseline Audit - 12/12/13 2. Capital Program Presentation to City Manager — 12/4/14 3. Capital Program Presentation to City Council — 2/17/15 4. Engineering Services — A Year in Review — 12/17/15 5. Peer review by the American Society of Civil Engineers 6. Engineering Services Department Assessment Data (3 ring binder) 7. Engineering Services Department — Policies and Procedures 8. 2015-2016 Adopted Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Planning Guide 9. 2012 and 2014 bond program projects 10. Street Committee Reports 11. Organizational Charts (with current positions, vacant positions, augmented staff, etc.) 12. Project Schedule charts 13. Staff salaries 14. Retirement Eligibility in the Engineering dept. 15. Consulting Engineering contracts (sampling) 16. Change Order history 17. Forms used for Contractor Pay Requests, A/E Consultant Performance, etc. 33 Appendix C - ENGINEERING SERVICES — PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION /RESOLUTION REPORT* *Source - City of Corpus Christi Engineering Department 11.2. Inconsistent workflow and review processes (technical & administrative) led to countless duplication of efforts & waste -b b • 3 = x ... _. b• co :4. io a 0 is in 11.1 Organizational structure and staff resources inadequate 1. ADMINISTRATIVE PROBLEMS Operate in a reactive mode - the same staff responsible for achieving the department's core Mission are also responsible for responding to third party data requests, action directives, etc. (e.g. - ORR, CCARs, Council requests, media requests, audits, assessments) There is no succession plan Support staff were devalued, overworked & underappreciated by other department staff members Other departments charge Engineering Services with performing functions which are riot part of its core Mission and circumvent Purchasing Policy Attrition rate remains high due to workload and compensation Augmented staff practices did not follow municipal gov't practices Compensation Plan is misaligned with market rates HR policies & procedures are inflexible and adversely impact ability to hire and retain qualified staff Engineering did not have a strategic plan in place for execution of back to back Bond programs _- Construction Engineering had no construction office manager, resulting in ineffective project construction management Front Desk activities were known & performed by only the temporary employee filling the position Bid process was cumbersome manual process 1 Project management tools were inadequate, unused, and unmanaged No dedicated staff to focus on recruitment efforts in order to address vacancies Misalignment between staff capabilities and roles Lack of communication & team cohesiveness v 0 v 3 All Support staff now have a backup. Some positions have multiple backups Leadership is working on further empowering staff, providing needed resources, & opening communications within department Services performed for other departments which are not part of the Engineering Services core mission have been identified Developing "on -boarding" materials for all new staff Used staff augmentation contracts to bring in qualified/experienced staff to meet needs Rewrote Job Assessment Questionaires in order to accomplish goals Used staff augmentation to ramp up to handle the demands Created Senior Project Manager position responsible for administrative management of construction Several staff members have been trained to act as backup to the Front Desk Created Quality Assurance position & instituted an assessment of department with identification of deficiencies and implementation of action items to address deficiencies Moved to an on-line bidding system (CivCast) Added IT Manager position Expanded recruiting tools to include magazines, job boards, newspapers, job fairs, etc. Construction Inspection RFQ increased the number of qualified and experienced Inspectors Added Administrative Manager to address/manage HR matters Contracted staff augmentation positions Created Asst. Director for Construction (Augmentee) Created Senior Project Manager position (Augmentee) Created Director of Engineering Services position Added Assistant Director for Support Created project teams based on functional areas (Street, Utilities, Facilities, etc.) Revised staffing plan to better align w/ Mission requirements Created monthly employee/safety meeting for entire department Support Services staff are empowered to work across divisions for better Continue to open channels of communication between communications, cohesiveness & problem resolution divisions & reduce "silo" mindset throughout department Actions Taken to Resolve Problem 1 Strategy Moving Forward Continue to open channels of communication between I divisions & reduce "silo" mindset throughout department Educate other departments on Engineering's core mission& reject future efforts to perform services not part of the department's core mission and/or which circumvent the Purchasing Policy Finalize & implement "On -boarding" materials Advocate for adjustments to Compensation Plan in order that qualified/experienced staff can be hired Develop a strategic plan for execution of back to back Bond programs PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION / RESOLUTION REPORT 12133NI9N3 930IA213E 0 w r rn v m z m c) 0 2 73 rn cn 0 r c 0 z rn 0 73 12133NION3 S]OIA213S W 0. W 0 W D • 1.3. Funds jeopardized because Federal / State - funded project requirements were not followed Problem Actions Taken to Resolve Problem I Strategy Moving Forward 1.3.a Projects subject to TxDOT/Federal funding were not readily identifiable Initiated unique project number to readily identify TxDOT projects iV is i N .. i CV —. i N 3 N CO - IV -. i A IV 6. i N 0 IV Q 11.2.a Projects were delayed because contracts or change orders took too long to Implemented uniform review/approval process, standardized routing sheets, from 4- be executed copy to single -copy contracts, and electronic routing for AE Agreements < $50K and Construction Change Orders < $100K Problem Actions Taken to Resolve Problem Strategy Moving Forward The City was going to lose state/federal funds due because no one had requested reimbursement Requirements of TxDOT-funded projects weren't being met because not enough members of the Engineering team know about them A summary log of TxDOT-funded projects was not developed Most current version of Agenda files (Memos, presentations, exhibits, etc.) are not provided timely to leadership Construction tracking log did not track when invoices went to Accounts Construction tracking log now includes date invoice went to Finance A/P for payment Payable Invoices sent to Director for approval would be delayed I Invoices not needing a PE's approval have been delegated to the Asst. Director of Support for approval Contracts were delayed in OMB because funds had not been verified and Funding is now aligned and verified before the contract goes to OMB for approval aligned Requisition approval in INFOR was delayed because of multiple approvers Approval authority was centralized to one person, with a backup approver and approval timeout resubmittals Ineffective processes and procedures lead to delays, errors, and incomplete Implemented a management steering committee to focus on continuous process files improvements INo record retention management (100 years -1,100 boxes) (Created a staff position responsible for record retention management Project documents were inconsistent with naming convention, were stored Implemented policies and procedures for document management including transfer of Need to complete moving all documents to PMS. on many different platforms, and were not centralized for access by all all project files to the Project Management System (PMS). Need for everyone to be following procedures/standards. Agenda memos and presentations were formatted and contained different Standardized Council Agenda Memos & presentations Continue to develop standardized content information depending on who put them together Assigned specific employee responsible to request reimbursements from TxDOT. Backup is also assigned. Developed work process for TxDOT projects & placed in PAL A specific employee is assigned as the TxDOT LGP liaison. A "backup" person is also assigned. 'Currently developing detailed flowchart of requirements & processes for TxDOT LGP projects Sent,significant number of employees to TxDOT LGP training Have created and maintained a summary of all TxDOT projects Timeout feature for requisition approval was removed, eliminating need for resubmittal Implemented PM and inspector training series including decision making, requirements planning, AE contracting, Change Orders Developed record retention in-house training program Bring forward historic electronic date and reconfigure to J LaserFiche J Sent support staff to State record retention training in Austin Developed a Comprehensive Record Retention Program Developed a comprehensive scanning program Create a division solely responsible for record retention Provide training and resources so that all Engineering Services positions understand their role(s) regarding TxDOT oroiects G j 1 1 Establish a process to ensure that leadership has the most current version of all Aaenda dncumPnts 0 w r rn v m z m c) 0 2 73 rn cn 0 r c 0 z rn 0 73 12133NION3 S]OIA213S 0) 73- Q) 0) 0) k.. 0) 0) _. 0) s 0) ea 0) 0) iD 0) a O) 0 O) c 1.6.a Construction staff work hours could not be verified Problem 1.6 Inadequate administrative controls were in place 1 .5.a Lack of understanding of JOC Program operating procedures led to Replaced JOC Facilities program w/ Multiple Award Contract program Continue to monitor to ensure adequate controls are in continuous challenging of activities within program. place and make adjustments as necessary 1.5 Contracting mechanism failed Problem 1 Actions Taken to Resolve Problem 1 Strateav Movina Forward A a A 0 A c A I1.4 Third Party Funds are not recovered Problem 1 Actions Taken to Resolve Problem Strateav Movina Forward Problem Actions Taken to Resolve Problem Strateav Movina Forward Contract tracking log was in Access data base, not user-friendly Contracts being routed internally for approval would get lost No system existed for tracking Change Orders AE invoices got "lost" in the process of being paid No system for continuous improvement existed Invoice payments took an average of 90+ days to process Electronic copies of records were not available, hardcopies were getting lost, and records/documents were not accessible by multiple staff members Bond funds were not routinely reconciled Department was failing to meet its Funding requirements Support staff offices/work spaces were not logically located Construction Inspectors were using their personal vehicles to do inspections Problems with timesheet verification of overtime, missed punches & exception reports Payroll, HR, IT, AP, QM & training efforts were duplicated in Construction Engineering, leading to duplication of efforts, increased costs & inefficiencies eneral Fund departments do not have funds for Engineering Reimbursements Department is not reimbursed by all City departments for which services are provided (ie. Project mgmnt, Survey, Land Acq., etc) Existance of 3rd party reimbursements (ICAs, grants, matching funds, etc.) Developing a workflow & process for ensuring that contracts with 3rd party funds due to Develop a workflow & process for ensuring that contracts for specific projects is not communicated throughout department City are properly administered with 3rd party funds due to City are properly administered Reimbursement doesn't take place because no one is assigned Assigned specific employee responsible to request reimbursements. Backup is also Develop a workflow & process for ensuring that contracts responsibility for administering contracts assigned. with 3rd party funds due to City are properly administered Converted to Excel Implemented "purple folder contract review identification procedure A Change Order Policy was created and quarterly Change Order reports have been implemented A tracking system was implemented A "Continuous Improvement Department Evaluation Plan" was developed Implemented processes for invoice payment including set review timelines, approval authorities, & electronic routing which reduced processing time to 23 days Gave Su.. • rt staff autho ' to • ull and reroute • • . roval-delayed documents A comprehensive scanning program has been developed and will be implemented soon Periodic full reconciliation of Bond Funds are performed and provided to Upper Management FY2014 Engineering Services reimbursement shortfall was recouped and FY2015 funds were appropriated Staff members were relocated to group common functions, match location w/ support role Practice was eliminated Implemented improved payroll policies and enforced adherence to policy Responsibilities were centralized to Engineering Services Support group Removed ability to use "teletime" in Kronos for punching in & out Continue to monitor to ensure adequate controls are in place and make adjustments as necessary Installed Kronos time clock at Construction Engineering site Actions Taken to Resolve Problem 1 Strateav Movina Forward Funds for Reimbursements are identified prior to execution of contract to the extent funding is available. Recommended the use of allocations through OMB - unsuccessfully Report out unfunded services provided Identify and quantify resources expended in support of departments which do not reimburse the department lUOd3e1 NOI1f11OS3N / NOI1V3IJI1N30I IN318O2 d i2I33NIJN3 S33IA2i3S PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION / RESOLUTION REPORT 12133NION3 S30IA213S N 12.1 Cumbersome & time consuming process for AE RFQ process1 2. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS V V V V V v 11.7 Support Staff Tools outdated O) 0) O) _• 0) 0) * Q) — Q) a O) 0 AE contracts took too long to be awarded & process was costly O o- !D 2 Only 1 HP Plotter/scanner was functional Project Management and support staff shared two networked printers, only one of which was in the department and the other of which was a production printer Hardcopy invoices were sent from Construction for processing leading to time delays in processing Notices to Proceed were mailed out leading to time delays in construction start Bid documents were not electronic Scanned documents were not using City's recognized record retention system (K:\ drive) p O' E 3 Other departments would try to encumber funds at the end of the fiscal year Have scheduled to send out notice of June 1st deadline Establish and communicate a deadline to other without executed contracts departments for which projects using funds from current fiscal year can be initiated, processed and contracted within Engineering 'Time sheets for reimbursement to Engineering Services are not integrated with INFOR Financial system, information input manually Contracts and other expenditures were paid out of unaligned sources Correct source of funds is now being identified and appropriately aligned before execution of contract Once contract is executed, funding is encumbered Proactively ordering leased computer renewals Mileage and overtime claims were out of control Audits were pertormed Electronic equipment inventory was not maintained 1 Performed comprehensive inventory !Continue performing periodic inventories Clerical staff in Construction office was acting as administrative manager Added administrative oversite to division at Assistant Director level Added temporary staff to support division No detailed Close-out Budget to determine actual project costs Developed Close-out Budget Worksheet based on reconciliation of expenditures Implemented processes for appropriately aligning funds Invoices routed for intemal review would get lost 1 "Green" folder allows for immediate identification of invoices in process for approval Routed contracts for Council agendas were handled with the same Routing slips for "Agenda" and "Non -Agenda" items were created "urgency" as routed contracts not needed for Council agendas Problem 1 Actions Taken to Resolve Problem 1 Strategy Moving Forward 1 Improved selection criteria balanced w/ input from local community Streamlined submission & interview requirements and reduced department costs Actions Taken to Resolve Problem Fixed the broken Plotter / scanner Two production level multifunction printer/copiers were brought into the department and other printers were realigned to better serve the department Invoices are now sent electronically Notices to Proceed are sent electronically & communicated across the department Implemented use of CivCast Developed a comprehensive scanning program using the City's LaserFiche program Actions Taken to Resolve Problem f Controls were set in place to manage expenses by requiring advance approval 1 Updated equipment 1 Created Senior Project Manager position responsible for administrative management of construction Create a standardized process that is documented & well understood by staff and the consulting community m O o _ > O T 0 a Ensure IT Support staff is informed of technical problems Assess the cost benefit of eliminating desktop printers Continue to assess resource needs of department and provide as funds are available Implement the comprehensive scanning program w m 0 o 0 n T 0 W a Continue to advocate with Finance / MIS for resolution of problem Develop processes to ensure that contracts, etc. are appropriately aligned to their funding source prior to execution PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION / RESOLUTION REPORT 12133NION3 S30IA213S 1 Problem 1 Actions Taken to Resolve Problem Strategy Moving Forward 12.5 Failed to follow requirements for TxDOT-funded projects (AE selection, design, bid development & award, etc.) N A N A 6 12.4 Failed to enforce design standards and perform technical review N W D) 12.3 No or Inadequate Estimating Tools and Techniques 1 Problem 1 Actions Taken to Resolve Problem Strategy Moving Forward N IV 7 N N (D N jV M N N CD N IV C. I 2.2.c N N Q N N 97 12.2. Inadequate Planning, Scoping or Preliminary Feasibility Reports prior to project implementation 1 Problem Actions Taken to Resolve Problem Strategy Moving Forward Plan review comments were not incorporated in subsequent design submittals Bond projects were budgeted & designed without incorporating required traffic signal upgrades Problem Bond 2012 & Bond 2014 Prop. 2 developed using in-house construction cost estimates that were consistently under -estimated Land Acquisition function was not appropriately included in execution of Bond projects (Some AE work performed was inadequate Failed to adequately budget for City share on grant funded projects Inadequate coordination with franchise utilities in design (Bond projects used utility IDIQs (Water/Wastewater) for subsurface work Project limits were not logically determined (ie. projects not extended to logical stop points) Failed to perform program & project constructability planning & review Major project elements such as traffic signals were overlooked O 0- A 3 Improved design reviews w/ AE presentaton and more consistent reviews w/ rejection ofI improper submissions Management has empowered PMs to reject designs if comments are not incorporated Plan review comments are now documented in design review procedures Coordinated meetings for Public Works: Engineering, Construction, Land Acquisition & Prepare future Bond packages with scope completion & Traffic Engineering constructability reviews Actions Taken to Resolve Problem Procuring consultants to help with preliminary engineering studies of potential Bond projects Trained PMs on estimating techniques Perform preliminary engineering before referendum Successfully reclassified Land Acquisition positions Land Acquisition was integrated into the project management process Enforcement of AE evaluations for positive feedback, future reference & selection Developed Deconstruct Funding spreadsheet in order to plan funding sources for TxDOT projects Coordinated meetings with stakeholders Introduced 3rd party Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) w/ improved timeline (upfront), cost savings, improved accuracy and GIS electronic files Problem has been recognized and will steps will be taken to ensure problem does not recur in future programs Bundled projects where possible for construction Problem has been recognized and will steps will be taken to ensure problem does not recur in future programs Coordinated meetings with stakeholders Creatively leveraged funds from grants to cover costs Preliminary Engineering Studies will be done to ensure project limits are complete and fully functional Flowcharted small AE contracting process & streamlined; anticipate cutting processing Apply same technique to large AE contracts time in half Increased use of Master Services Agreements (MSA) w/ staff -approvable task orders Expand use of MSAs Improved contract standards Actions Taken to Resolve Problem I Strategy Moving Forward V). c7 o5.o o T 7D v 1 i 1E Identify Grant projects as part of Bond project development prior to referendum and "reserve" the funds throughout execution of the nroiects Utility work will be incorporated into street project To the maximum extent possible, streets will not be broken into multiple parts Preliminary Engineering Studies will be done to ensure project limits are complete and fully functional 73 O co r m v rn z --i I1 5 cnO z m 0 r c 0 z m 0 12133N1JN3 S33IAI3S en a) I3.2.d Inspectors not adequately trained (.) N 0 W N Q CO N N 13.2 Inadequate construction team resources, training & certifications with continual reports ions of conflicts andResolve delays I Problem ActTaken to Problem 1 Strategy Moving Forward W M W W W n W 0 W 0 W W 13.1 Disconnect between Engineering & Construction Office creates loss of design scope enforcement, cost increases, schedule losses, & decreased quality assurance 3. PROJECT EXECUTION PROBLEMS N 0 N in Q N (n N Inspectors could not readily provide guidance to contractors Too few inspectors to effectively handle all of the projects underway TxDOT-funded project funds in jeopardy because requirements were not met it Contractors could not identify City Construction Inspectors to know that they were present PMs were not engaged in construction of projects for which they were responsible Projects were not managed to stay within budget & within scope Construction did not adequately communicate program execution problems to PM Design problems encountered by inspectors not documented & transmitted upward Lack of cohesiveness within department O Q' fD 3 The City was going to lose the ability to be awarded state/federal funds clue because no one had requested reimbursement for funds already awarded Problem Projects subject to TxDOT/Federal funding were not readily identifiable Requirements of TxDOT-funded projects weren't being met because not enough members of the Engineering team know about them Added Senior Program Manager to provide add, oversight & direction Developed inspector training program Added experienced construction staff through staff augmentation Implemented inspector training series including decision making, requirements planning, AE contracting, Change Orders Sent employees to TxDOT Local Government Project training Issued Construction Inspection RFQ; increased number of qualified & experienced Project anticipated workload and adjust accordingly Inspectors City uniforms policy was implemented for Inspectors Implemented standardized Construction Progress Meetings Implemented PM and inspector training series including decision making, requirements planning, AE contracting, Change Orders Implemented standardized Construction Progress Meetings Implementing changes to SPMP: • Smaller construction packages to increase construction resources & competition • Revised timeline to seasonal construction vs calendar eyar • Changed cost & quantity tracking to individual streets rather than DO • "Real-time" automated PCI survey w/ inventory of ADA ramps, markings, etc. Enforcement of AE evaluations for positive feedback, future reference & selection Coordinated meetings for Public Works: Engineering, Construction, Land Acquisition & Traffic Engineering Implemented procedures for timely response to contractors re: field changes & direction Actions Taken to Resolve Problem Assigned specific employee responsible to request reimbursements from TxDOT Developed work process for TxDOT projects & placed in PAL Ensure required processes/procedures are followed IA specific employee is assigned as the TxDOT LGP liaison. A "backup" person is also assigned. Currently developing detailed flowchart of requirements & processes for TxDOT LGP projects Sent significant number of employees to TxDOT LGP training Train Project Managers so that they can ensure requirements are met from design through close -nut Actions Taken to Resolve Problem � Strategy Moving Forward 1 Initiated unique project number to readily identify TxDOT projects Implement training program Ensure feedback from Construction is included in Engineer) evaluations Continue to open channels of communication between divisions & reduce "silo" mindset throughout department c...9 El co O Q 0 0 T 0 DJ 3 70 0 co r m v rn m zz G7 Z O m -173 O z cn m m Cn < O r C rnN O z m v 0 3.6.a [Projects subject to TxDOT/Federal funding were not readily identifiable initiated unique project number to readily identify TxDOT projects 1 Problem 1 Actions Taken to Resolve Problem Strateav Moving Forward 13.6 Failed to follow requirements for reimbursement on TxDOT projects W in 6 W w N a, U O1 3.5 Inadequate coordination w/ franchise utilities in construction 3.4.d City had no mechanism for preventing award of contracts to construction Developed & Implemented Debarment Ordinance Contractor and AE evaluations post -project are companies with histories of repeatedly failing to meet project schedules documented and filed in central location for easy reference W A b I 3.4.b ca A 41 3.4 Project Schedules were Not Followed Problem 1 Actions Taken to Resolve Problem Strateav Movina Forward w W h W W Q w W co 13.3 Lack of Well-defined Scope / Budget Control 1 Problem I Actions Taken to Resolve Problem I Strateav Movina Forward W N 6 Insufficient Construction Inspectors to adequately facilitate coordination Plans were bid with significant utility conflicts, resulting in change orders and delays AEs were performing poorly O Q W 3 12 -month program for seal coat work was executed in 19 months, leading to delay of implementation of 2nd year of work, as well as rework associated with pavement degradation during 'off" period Projects were not managed to stay within budget & within scope Field changes or direction take too long to be resolved Too many change orders were being issued IDIQ expenditures were poorly controlled Projects were not managed to stay within budget & within scope Problem Inspectors had to share City vehicles Issued Construction Inspection RFQ to bring on -board qualified & experienced staff Introduced 3rd party Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) w/ improved timeline (upfront), cost savings, improved accuracy and GIS electronic files Developed AE evaluations for positive feedback, future reference & selection Consistently provide feedback to AEs Actions Taken to Resolve Problem 1 Strateav Moving Forward Implementing changes to SPMP: • Smaller construction packages to increase construction resources & competition • Revised timeline to seasonal construction vs calendar eyar • Changed cost & quantity tracking to individual streets rather than DO • 'Real-time" automated PCI survey w/ inventory of ADA ramps, markings, etc. Implemented standardized Construction Progress Meetings Implemented procedures for timely response to contractors re: field changes & direction Leadership has communicated that holding to project scope is a priority Implementing changes to SPMP: • Smaller construction packages to increase construction resources & competition • Revised timeline to seasonal construction vs calendar eyar • Changed cost & quantity tracking to individual streets rather than DO • 'Real-time" automated PCI survey w/ inventory of ADA ramps, markings, etc. Implemented PM and inspector training series including decision making, requirements planning, AE contracting, Change Orders Construction Inspection RFQ will allow more inspectors in field to control adherence to approved project scope I Implemented standardized Construction Progress Meetings Actions Taken to Resolve Problem Strategy Moving Forward , Purchased new trucks, retained older trucks as backups More closely monitor execution of IDIQ contracts & increase PM involvement; communicate concems more effectively with AE. Implement electronic collaboration tools to meet schedule commitments Identify and mitigate potential change orders early Improve the constructability of plans by incorporating a more active role of construction management in project execution More closely monitor execution of IDIQ contracts & increase PM involvement; communicate concems more effectively with AE. 0 co r rn v rn z T_ c) O z rn cn0 r c 0 z m 0 I2I33NIJN3 S33IA2I3S 0 co r rn v m z T_ C) cnO z m 0 r c 0 z m 0 12J33NI9N3 S3OIAb3S 11 11 CO v Q W H N 3.7 Project management software was not functional Problem 1 Actions Taken to Resolve Problem 1 Strategy Moving Forward W c) A W cm Q IT support within department was inadequate There was no champion for the existing PM software No one was using the existing PM software Multiple PM software systems had been "thrown away" because staff did not use them The City was going to lose state/federal funds due because no one had requested reimbursement Requirements of TxDOT-funded projects weren't being met because not enough members of the Engineering team know about them O Q ID 9 [Assigned backup Hired an IT employee responsible for addressing technology needs of the department including EPM Upper management empowered QA Manager to "push" forward use of the existing PMS Assigned backup Assigned backup Upper management empowered QA Manager to "push" forward use of the existing PMS Included a Quality Assurance Manager in staff augmentation to facilitate use of the existing project management software Assigned backup Assigned specific employee responsible to request reimbursements from TxDOT Developed work process for TxDOT projects & placed in PAL A specific employee is assigned as the TxDOT LGP liaison. A "backup" person is also assigned. Currently developing detailed flowchart of requirements & processes for TxDOT LGP projects Sent significant number of employees to TxDOT LGP training Actions Taken to Resolve Problem Enhance effectiveness of EPM for online collaboration I Enhance effectiveness of EPM for online collaboration Include add, trainina for staff on EPM Include add'I trainina for staff on EPM Enhance effectiveness of EPM for online collaboration Enhance effectiveness of EPM for online collaboration Include add'I training for staff on EPM Provide training and resources so that all Engineering Services positions understand their role(s) regarding TxDOT oroiects Fa; m 0 0 0 I1 0 11 d a 0 co r rn v m z T_ C) cnO z m 0 r c 0 z m 0 12J33NI9N3 S3OIAb3S AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting of July 12, 2016 DATE: TO: June 6, 2016 Margie C. Rose, Interim City Manager FROM: Constance P. Sanchez, Director of Financial Services ConstanceP@cctexas.com (361) 826-3227 FY 2015 Audited Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name Title/Position 1. Constance P. Sanchez Director 2. 3. OUTSIDE PRESENTER(S): Name Title/Position 1. F. John Shepherd Partner 2. 3. BACKGROUND: Department Financial Services Organization Collier, Johnson, & Woods, P. C. On May 10, 2016, F. John Shepherd, a partner with Collier, Johnson, & Woods, P. C. made a detailed presentation to the Audit Committee reviewing the financial results of FY2015. The presentation to the City Council will be a summary of the results. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Powerpoint — FY2015 CAFR FY2015 CAFR Highlights of the Audited Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 Council Presentation July 12, 2016 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 1 T WWW.CCTEXAS.COM Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 IABLE OE CONTENTS Exhibit Page Number Number DVTRODECEOM' SECTION Letter, Transmit. GFOA Certificate lof ChmnRment for Excellence in Flamm' Reporting City Organtramnl Chart FFN.ANCLAL SECTION hsdryxadeat Auditoria Report hilanagement1a Discussion and Analysis Basic Fiamci 1 Statments GoSmmmeot-wide Financial Statements Statement ofNN Paaition lA 20 Statement ofAcliuitea 1-B 22 Fund Fwncial Statements Governmental Funds Balance Sheet 2A 24 Reomihatian of the Goremmentd Funds Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Pmitioa 2-B 29 Statement of Revenues Expenditures, and Cbmges k Fiend Dam 2-C 39 Rernacihation of the Governmental Funds Stakmest of Rummies, Expenditium and Changes in Fund Balances t the Statement of Actiudties 2-0 35 General Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes )n Fund Balance-Budget(GAAP Basis) and Acord 3 36 Pwptetary Funds Statement ofNet Position 4-A 3S Pm:oar...an of the Proprietary Funds Statement of Net Position to the Covemment-wide Statement of Net Position 4-B 43 Statement ofResvnuns, Expenses, and Changes m Net Position 4-C 44 Rewmcilmhon of the Proprietary Fm. SGtment of Revenues, Eimeneec and Changes in Net Position. the Statement of Actuates 4-0 45 Statement of Cash Flaws 4-E 46 Fiduciary Funds Statement of Net Position 5-A 48 Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position 5-13 49 Notes to the Financial Statements Note 1- Summary of Significant Automating Pohries 51 Note 2 -Budget Policy and Budgetary Amount, 66 Note 3 -Saks Ta Revenue 61 Nme4-Properly Taxes 61 3 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 SABLE OF CON -BEN -FS Exhibit Page Number Number Nene 5-Depovits and have... Note 6 -Budgetary.. Note]- Recaaables Notes- CepMel Assets Note 9 - Employment ReMemmt Fwe5m Note IP -Poet -Employment Health Cam Benefits Note 11-I1a105amagemeot Note 12-Oprnbnglcases Nate 13 -Lwgmm Obligations Nate 14 -Advance 11.mdwrs and De5eaaanem Note 11-Nted. Transfers. Receivables a. Payables Note 16 -Fund Dermas Note 1i- Cond. Debt Chap,. Note 18-Commianwnts Note l9- Service CoureesimAnaugement for City GolfCwusm Note 20 Segment 16armahon for Entapau Funds Req.. Supplementary lu6mution Whet Port-Bmploymeut Benefits 94 5 M1,61- of Changes.Net Penmen Lnbih6s amt Related Ratios 95 Schedules of Conmbotions 96 Combining and IndmAtal Fwd Fan:. Statrmuh and Sch.:aim Onvemineutal Ftmds General,. Behan S6ceH SA 101 Scheiule of Revenues and Other Financing Somcev (Budget Has.), Compered10 Budget 6-0 102 Schelde of Expmditmea Oludgetl3asisX Compared to Budget 6-C ltd Gene. EU.(Developmwa Seuias) 5[of Revenues and Other Financing Som W m (Budget et Hams), Compared. Budget 6-0 122 Schedule of Espt�itmea MudgetBuia), Cwtpued m Budget 6-E I2d Debt Semce Fund Balance She. S[helde of RenExpenAes, and Clan,m Ford Selene- Ba udget (GAAP Basis) and Actual Nmunajm Gmummmlxl Fwtls Combining Balance Sheet Combwog Statement of Revenue. Expenditures, and Changes..ad Balm. !-A 128 l -B 129 8-A 132 8H 134 Special Revenue Ftmds Comb --Balance Sheet 9-A 138 4 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 FABLE OF CO\FE\ES Exhibit Page Number Number C 3wug Statement of Essen., Espe¢dik ,and Changes. Smut Balances 9-2 146 Visitors FaciMes Owl Balance Sheet 13, 150 Schedule of Revenues Eapenditmes, and Changes m Emd Halma—Budget(GIIAP Basis) and Actual 10.E 151 Occupancy Tax Fwd Balance Sheet 11A 152 S Stasis et Revenues tan., and Changes. m Fd Balance—Budge){GAl1GA AP Baa.J and Actual 11-B l53 TOM Educator. and Govenamental Cable TV Balance Shcet 12A 1 5 Schedule of Reseal., Expeuditmm, sod Changes m Fwd Balance—Budget(GAAP Basis) and Actoal 12-B 155 Redhgld rhoto Enforcement Balance SheISA 156 Schedule of Revenues evenues, Expel...es, and Changesm Fwd Balance—BeerrOG,AP Basis) and Anmal 13-B 151 Pahang Improvement Fwd Balm, She14A 15p . Schedule of To emu, Eapenahreb and Changes a Emd Balance—Bndget(G,AF Basis) end Actual 14-B 159 StreetSlaintmmre Fwd Balance Shat 15A 160 Schedule of Rerreaua,Eap.tlitwes, and Chang.m Emd Balance—BudgeOGAAP Bays)and Actual 15-B 161 Federal... Grants Fmd Rrla.r Sheet 16-A 162 Schedule of.oenues,EapeutlBend Changes m Fundd Balance —BudgeOGAAP4P Bans) and Actual 16A 163 Idunicmal Comt Fund Balance Sheet I7 -A 149 Statement ...cermet Espendneres and Changes m Fa. Balance —BudS.(GAAP Bas0mdAdual 11A 165 mmawty Enactment Fwd Balance Shat 18-A 166 Statement ofRoeaue Eapmtlitmes, and Changes. Fund Balance 18-13 161 InfraMmeme Balance Sheet md 19-, 168 Statement of Revenues, Expenditmec and Changes m REM Balance 19-B 169 Local Emergent Ha Comminee Balance Sheet 20A 110 S Mas, o€Resew ec Expeoditm®, and Change.. m Fwd Balance—Budget(GAAP Bass) and A[mal 20-6 111 Goons Christi G®mnuts Immovemeot Corporal. Balance Shed 21A 112 5 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 ]'ABLE DF CONTENTS Exhibit Page Number Numb. - Statement of Belmar, Expenditures, and Changes m FinadBalance bbe 113 ierp ss Christi Haus, Finance Cmposaden Schedule of Net Poartion 22-1 174 SchdJe of Activities 22-B 175 Balance Sheet 22-C 376 Slahmmt of Revenue, F ditmes, d Chaaigeam Fend Balance 22-D 17] Cmpm Christi Indusal Development Cmpocatiw Balance Sheet 231 178 Menne. of Revmwx Eapenditmee, and Changes m Fund Balance 23-B 179 Comm Christi mm Cwhol and Pmzntire District Schedule of Net Position 24-A 180 Schedule of Adhati. 20.13 181 Balance Sheet 24-C 182 Schedule of Rev—Budget & d amen. m., and Changes m Fund Balance —Budges(GAAPBede) and Actual 20.0 183 Comm Chris b Development Comm -men 1M - Schedule ofAcMiitiess 2513 185 Balance Sheet 25-C 186 Scheid, of Reveal.. Emma.... and Changer in Fond Balance 25-D 188 Seawall Improvement Fund Schedule orRev9ea Expembhuex and Changes w Fundle alance—Budget(GAAP Bads) and Actual 250 190 Arena FadityFund Schedule of Revenues, Expmditmei lad Changes w Fwd Balance—Budget (GAAP Ban) and Actual 250 191 Economic DevelopmmtFund Schedule ofliermuev Expendmaes_rad Changer w FwdBalmre—Budget(GAAP Bases) and Actual 25-0 192 Seawall Debt Seance Fwd Schedule alt, enueb Expenditures, red Changes m PmlBahume— Budget (...Bais) and Adml 25B 393 Arena Debt Smice rm. Schedule a.m., Expenditures, and Changes m ...Mame —Budget (GAAP Bass} and Actual 252 194 among, Development Debt Senice Schedule ofRevenum Emma...11,, 8 end Changes in Prod Belmce—Budget (GAAP Basis) and Aelual 25l 19£ NoDevelop.. Car,. on Schedule of Net Pumice 26, 196 Schedule fA26-0 197 Balance Sheet 26-C 198 Schedule of Revenues, Expending., and Changes in Fwd Balance 26-D 199 6 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 FABLE OF CONSENTS E xhibie Page -umber Itininhet General Fwd Schedule ofRevenue, ErpendF�s, sod Changes m Fwd Balance—Budget (GAAP Bass) and Actual 26.E 201 Remvesaient Zane k3 Balance Shea Statement ofRam2xc Expenditures, and Changes m Fund Balance -BIAS. (GAAP Bnae)wd actual 27A 202 27-3 203 Capital Pro,. Funds Street Capital Projects Fwd Balance Shell 28-A 206 Statement ofRevenues Expmditmes, and Changes m Fwd Balance 28-B 207 Balance Sheet 29-A 208 Comb2 Statement of Revenues, Expeoditmn, and Changes mFvndBataneee 29. 212 Pmpdetary Fun. Eolegnse Funds UcSystemFled Combining Schedule of Net PosMon 30A 218 Combwng Schedule of Revenue, apemen and Changes mNet Petition 30.B 221 Combming Schedule of Cash Flocs 30-C 222 Anport Fwd Schedule 20442242on 31A 224 Schedule et Reveenes_ Eapeosea and Changes m Net Position 31A 226 Scher. of Cash Flows 31. 227 Combining Statement ofNat1.'4EAim 32-A 228 Combiing Schedule ofRevenum Eryeoves, and Changes in Net Bosnian 32A 231 Combing Statement of Cash rim. 32-C 233 Internal Sal ice Funds Combining Statement of Net Poesio33-A 236 Cobimug StatementB RevStatement ofemaes, Expenses, and Changes m Net Position 33-2 238 C®bivng Statement of Cush Flows 33-C 240 Bim lyPreemkd Component Uma Combining Statement of Net Polodon 34A 246 Combining Statement of Activities 343 247 Capital Assets UM a Ike Opmti® of Governmental Funds 023echzIe by Source 35-A 249 7 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 TABLE OF CONTE_RS Exhibit Page Number Number Schedule by Faction and Activity 35-0 250 Schedule of Changes by Function and Actnnty 35, 252 STATISTICAL SECTMN Net Pout. by Component 1 256 Changes m13,1 Posili® 2 258 Governmental Activities Tax Revenues by Source 3 263 Fend Balance of Governmental Fla.4 264 Changes inFuodGahrs of Goamom®Ial Funds 5 266 u General GernmentalTax and Business Feer by Soma 6 270 Assessed Value and Estimated Actual Value ofiaaable Prolwty0 271 Ra Property Tax Rites —Dire, and Overlapping Goa�eats 8 272 Principal Property Tu Payers 9 274 Property Tax levies and Cautions 10 275 Adapted Tut Ease 11 219 Ratios ofOota,aoding DeMby Type 12 278 Ratios of General Bonded Deb, OuWandwg 13 280 Overt and OaerlapPmg Governmental. AtusMea Debt 14 281 Legal Marga Ink rmaEom 15 202 Pledged -Revenue ledgged-Revenue Coverage 16 204 Demographic and £canonic Statistics 17 286 Principal Empbym 18 287 Full,me Egwaalect CityGovnnm®t Employes by Function 19 288 Operating Indicators by Function 20 292 Capital Asset Sta.., by Function 2t 294 ...ham.Statistical Data 22 298 City PayrorStalmtus 23 300 Retirement Sptem Pension lata 24 301 Insurance and Surety Bonds in Force 25 302 SH,031E AUDIT SECTION Independent A.B., Report tie lhtrsval Conn, over Financial Reputing and on Compliance and Otber Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Perfumedm Accordance with Govemmem Auditing Standard., 305 Independent Auditor, Report on Compliance wiORegunementr That Could Have aired and 134teaial EOM en Each Major Program and Internal Control ow Compliance in Accordance an& LLoilao A-133 301 3 b..TiLr of Federal Roam, and Qoctinaed Costs 309 Independent Auditor's Report on ComphancexdOReguirements That Could Have a Mr, wad Material radon Each Major State Program and Internal Control over Compliance m Accordance with the Stah of Texas Single Ault Fth±, 313 Schedule of Slate Findings and Quest.. Coal 315 8 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 TABLE OF CO\TFVIS Exhibu Page Number \umber Schedule of FedemLSlate Fspeudihues of Awards 319 Notes to Schedule ofFederaliStale Expmditmes of Awards �... Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 il Gavemment Firtanee Offiws Assn Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presnzedto City of Corpus Christi Texas Foeite CanpmRnsire Annual Financial Repan for the lerreal Yeer Faded September 30, 2014 ttrt..opve on.:mneret Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 COLLIER, JOHNSON &WOODS, P.C. g,6t.6�9 211:1IPQIGENT AUDITOR'S REPORT March 31, 2016 The Honorable May, Citycmmril Members. and he City Manager of the City ofCorm. C *reem Repma on the Fiuueia l Statements. accompany-rugWe have aurnted Me Bo.. statements ed busiaoe -ty m.o., the aggregate disccoMe mponent � discretely presented t ortgovernmental fund and the aggregate rem., rad w®ati®of the City of Corpus Corm Tens as of am for we you ended September 30,2n15 and mea latmmtermme .1.11.81 statm®ts,w.mcoumaveiy compose we City's basic financial stateme. as hated no the Wale orcontents Management, Respun.ilinfar eke Financial Shrew. Management u responsible m the paepaneon and fav presenptien of these fwaocial statements in accordance var. accounting principle. generally accepted. the Umted Staten ofAmenc....c.de. the cleQgn miplementaton and inaMenance of internal control An,. to the prepaxation pasentatim offim financial ststmemathat are See frmmamul mot...,, whetherto rand oenw. AudirosY Responnbalin Our responsibility u m express spun. on mese r>msial statements based moor auchl We did whose usets were St523 sn and ®mw vwere di AA�Center e $5,443,033 e u sane CConvened corer Farm whose assets were $2,114,5,373 and renames were 53322,006 androe Ammunsore Corm Mena Operations whoseFund were $3.125,952 and memWIC e S2,651,685. Thos the by other ® se reports thereon have bhmiandm rias and o mesion Mo were relates to .e amasmb.ctaded for ...pus crotid Convention ad Visitors Buren and the Ammcan COMM.Bank Center Center Fund and Arena Operations Fwd, is bundon d We reports of the Mher auditors We con.. ou: au. actordtmce with dtmg mndvN generally accepted. the United States of Amenca and mstandards applicable to Emancial ancorned . Gouarnmant Au .ng al by ale Sta. rhase standards re...at we plan General of the U.fed and perform the malt to obtam reasonable assn.. about whether the fiosncaal statements ase free from material orastatenent M audit involves pestom.g ptadums to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and selected depend onto aultoisjodgmeat,.clW.g the assecsmem of the nsks of matMal to fraud or error jrn ma., those ® the entity's preparation and fau ...at. of the rnancial drnements in or. to design audit procedures that am appropriam in the the pmpose ess. an an on Me effect veness of the entity's internalc ercodingglly.we express no such audit MoaN1 also includes ernhat.g the appropriateness of ramming Rohde.... and the reasonableness of significant accounting emimm made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. 11 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 We belleve Mat the suet ecadence we have Mooned Is sufficient And appmpnate to psomdes baste far our man °names Opinions In m pw1 p the financial statements.refmd to above prem. Ea Early, u all ®serulreepecs, the respective financial position of the govmmental acnviMm, 0n bww®stype activities, the aggregate dhscreeely prevented component wits, each malar fwd, and the segregate remaining fwd information of dm City of Corpus ChriA, Texas as ofSeptember 30 201 S and 3erespective changer a fmanculposition cash llows. where applicable, and the mpertive budgetp g e Belly for the general fwd thereof for the Men en ended in accounting on.accounting principles generally acoVed m the Umted States of America. Emphasis of e Slather Aa discussed m No. IP_ to the Pm°u01 ahkmnux, the City has implemented Mal Aecomeng Standar. hard Statements No. 68 and 71 Mated te accounting for pension. elective October I., 2014 Our opinion num modified with respect to thin matter. Mar issuers Required Supp6menmry lnfornM'on Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management': dimuaniw and analysis and the °mer refused wpplementary information on pages 5 through 18 and 94 through Me presented to supplement the bane financial statements. Such information, although not a req.. part of the bane financial statements, is regrind by the CovemmentalAmoundog 9sndnds Board, who rmndeoitMk mess®tial pane financial reporting for placingdachas,financial appropriatnpaonooil, economic, or Mammal context 0. have applied certain limited ts m pm`ceAnto w the required supplement, turf tion in accordance with inmng Aandads generally accepted M the United Stave of America, whtuh consisted of mqueiea of management regarding the methods ofprepvmg the uformation and comparing the 3M°watiw fm consistency withmanagement's responses toomiuquaies, the bade financial statements, and other knowledge we obtaineddmwg our wdat afihehaaic Somcdp statements. We do not express mopioiw or provide my usmaae onthe information bemuse the lirutrd proorns donut provide us with sufficient evidence to express an oputun or➢mnde any assurance_ 0.6.7Inform8wn Om milt was conducted Um the purpose of fmmmg °pumas on the Emanuel skkmonfs that Ilecevely comprise the City of Cmpw Mose, bade (manual statement. The intrMucimy section, combining and udiviAW nomwlm fend Sumvial statements and schedule, capita assets rased u the operation of governmental Randa and the staeaecal sectio listed mthe table of contents are presented for purposes of addttiowl analysis and menet a squired," of the basic financial statementsThe schedule of expenditures of lednal/at, awards, pages 339 through 328 u pimento& for purposes of additional analysis al rammed by we U.S. Office of Management and Budget CnSdar A-133, A pia ofsmtu, Local Government, °ndNm-PrSi Organisun2m and by the Stale flmm Sing/v.9adif...Liar tmued by the Gmvemm s.Office of Budget and planing and is also net a rammed part ofroe financial statements.. The combining and mdivddual Pani statements and schedules. capita astute wedu the operation of govemmenml funds and the schedule of expenditures of federal/.tate .3!362616,3±./.12t8.112.31. are the responsilniny of management and were deme. Hem and relate direly to the unledymg accormeng and other rectum used 12 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 mprepare the financial statements. meriting dmreaappmd na auld of the basic financial reconciling such Mformation °mo° recorsgyI ��dthe the combo], and individual Mud ember:a:eat :basic financial statements or to the Pane &limn] asset used M the operatien a �res an accordance urht auditing standards generally nda1 of expenditures arae 1. a fatrq 110/3amid map ®mm resfpects IE ml..eov mroe financialumtmmn taken as o whole. The Introductory and statastical sections have man. subjectedw the fuAmgp,oad,va applied in the mkt of Me c Enanem.statement and acemdIngty,we donut express an opinion or provide any ascurance on them_ Other ReportMg Required by Gorr.men.o g Standards In accordance with GnxarnmentAuditing Standani , we have also Med our report dated March 31, 2016 on om comidmation of tle CAT's intwal control ovcf caal repdimg and our mat of it ts ▪ mp• pmpose of kancewith remioprovisiims of laws, regulationsecagreementsand,. agreements and other nuttnutters_Watmpon Mclean. thtg, ofour testing ofinernal control aver financialreporting • omptieme and the reale of tart eamg, and not m pmvdde an opinion on the Internal control over financlal report,oe on compliance_ real report is an integral part of mmtlit performed In accordance xtAudcnug..riorN In comideringroe City's mfewl control over 6mvnilrapormg and mphanre. 13 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 3 11155111131.150,1015mN Primary Gamma a -ry 151151165 ASSETS wz:mm6 (Nom 5] 3 176553633 s 1163.21,6111 X1331334 (or aoambN.61555 13,11173 31,951,935 4611;511 11,55551551.56555 11533311 216.331 1556/655565 • 6� 1150,162 193,356 15 71,9,55 5519 1 1115153) 161316504 313,651161 575,961316 ▪ n�r¢aete1be665.u55elMvbla(5'ae� 11553.519 123.052 31350.561 19,31 11X31 _ m'orz 1) 1563.11,6511 3115515,175 555,93626 O ther 5.5µ¢3a: olarkdepziatlw 5v 565565aw 6C'n111� 1179.14 Pail es.. 1.051.5.11,311 2.111911,5617 1.-xces 1x1 sw 1155565155551.5 555.5.5115 55555.5¢15111165 11.51 11554.113 15,91512,23 ]153]315 To56 515.561.55.657 efresearces 26966,555 15 745.539 91710919 .55:5[..35561.16 726143 1211xI 9359s50 1691190 1567404 r®6a Ski 5114,1115593,613 1.1r, :Lammas ,ti.�l. 186133 1.165 _ .3 796957 3911957 3339166 115,210 3,885346 6151 (Note 11) 3.751056 - 3.n1w6 17.51.115:11,5513) • ® 515E9m 86419514 • cog 756123 56,311 od raopmseaia5eae ]3791,19 1, 916]136 r�eu,d'u3cm®9mft 651 11) 6916306 - 6,990306 ImS�6eti�i s, m.51ing omm p.m 656611) _ 189,531,5 164150,913 1 1155.917;153 1.9.6115555555 56x 17411,021 151 • ula0.L�tldru�osaa2a2ss 31656.413 513113]5 955a55156611,65 15591 1161,61-51n 16951.195 350155196 517 a65561m Ma. 111 16913011 535.711 11.730.71). M.• , pia refinatlei debt c45 361193 1151565.1.1.55.5551.551.56565515.5551,11556 9) 0.135.435 1,556 6510555155055556Insoures 110199 110.193 411951 14 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 Primary Government Gocxxameadl Snsmess-Irpe Acdcaties Act -vibes ToI I NET POSITION tier Evened inrspatal meta 16 379,713 768.459,900 1036,830,513 R ri t dfne Vital slatisdG recordsaerendnn 307,831 — 307131 Hood Eterest and redemption 1,314,500 2.457,383 3,801,883 Municipal and focemle Court 646,348 616,348 Fire oontribulioo trust 5,585 5,585 PEG equipment and Liana. 1.786,069 — 1,786,064 Tourism (H01) 6,105990 — 6,105,890 TraSs iaf; programs 757109 — 75$809 Stale and f_' _• gram pmg am 988,411 — 988,412 Pads and recratdon $629,415 — $629,415 Inhashocdue development 1,696,446 — 1,696,446 Loans 14,086,807 — 14,086,807 Crime control arra prenrtim 5411,581 — 3941,581 Snsiress and job development 66,381,385 — 66,381,395 TM Mamma none mgrocemeo6 1254453 — 8,254,453 Publichea1lh — 5.633.282 3,637,383 Lase enf emee od5cer; standr& and eau:tram — 3,974 3,474 Cnomuction of capital assets — 11.931,593 11,931,33 Odle — 95,765 95,765 latimM ted {93,108,769) 55.457,952 (37,659,817) Tidal net position S 285,697,675 S 844".043,749 3 1.129,741,424 The notes to rhe financial nauseamt; are an integral part ofhis mammal. 15 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 STATEMENT OF ACTIFTIIES NEAR ENDED SEPT0.93ER 2015 Expenses Exhibit 143 Fropgam Rerenee Operating Capital Charges for Grant and Grants and Services Ceenita0iens Cans ibutions ]k®sy pommel, Goremmaa] activides Genes] goveromen 1 21.995.432 1 25.920,218 S - 4 94.364 Petite end =ideal coin 91,09,902 13.910994 1,931,231 30244 Fire and amtultace 48,724.23'7 6,873,54E 748,564 - Emergew =agate. 463.555 225241 - Iaper9ons 2.319,102 - - - Sireet 34,051,105 12.534.196- 4,3315,748 Heath 5940977 2,281.734 2.045,969 - Parl>and recrea?on 19928,992 3.246,304 2332,070 1288.269 Uteri. 4,575,572 143588 80,561 20 Muse -not 1,366,875 697,555 - Cmnemid, 5,851215 9.829 1,082,854 709900 Comity developmen 13,365,073 3,768,579 1,172,603 879,905 Convention and riam ravines 16228,459 4.417.120 - - Interestmlongiesmddebt 16,218266 - - 323376 Teal gosemmemal amines 131,067,484 73,554,579 9,899,152 7911.823 Business -1m54 acm2mes Solid Tame 29,152,032 37,415401 Unities Water 107235,791 121,958577 643,387 2,090.958 201 3425x6,174 91.105,010 55.265 38173 Watewatt 56,192,115 58,438526 547,581 2905.352 Anpoa 11.631,297 10,549,237 19,399 20,779.953 Golf cater, 214,575 514,039 - - Marma 1.9 97.197 1,911,146 - 095.249 145413455e01-1590 artiviles 741.30,481 272,853,739 1 225,3.35 27219,650 Total primarygOrvvxrm5em 3 574.447,05 4 346.408,218 9 11,123,487 S 35.111.486 16 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 SI191111717 011309111191390 0,5909,99 099670,.99339,5 99169 Acentes 5161.057337931 09.510.410 11117015,193 17 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 City of Corpus Cluisti GASB 61 & 71 Implimentatioa Net Pension Obligation Net Pension Liability Deferred Ouflows: Contributions subsequent to measurement date Difference between projected and actual investment earnings Changes in assumptions Deferred Inflows - Difference between expected and actual experience Beginning Unrestricted Beginning of End of Year Year 40,497.097 — (247,025,033) (254,715,626) 17,912,656 19,459,753 8,802.101 275.261 (4,217,963) (188,615,280) (230,396,474) 67,121,167 Restated Beginning (121487.113) 18 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY 1 5T063 L617ON SCHEDULE or CONTRBCTIONS 1TSA5 MUNICIPAL RETLSS!MENT SY57E4I 2509 2610 2111 1412 2413 1014 2015 R juiced coaalmdan F 21400,512 $ 24301494 1 25311,516 8 12,769,666 f 32,565,524 1 37.872,623 8 74926,054 Ann] coouibuiom 17,109,193 18,336,551 15.832,574 15.546.645 18,101,720 26302,711 18974,205 Conmbution deficiency 3909,310 6,631,943 8354042 7.225,022 6553,104 7569,913 5954,649 Comsat emaployae pagmll 168 555,179 114595,561 /14561062 188,160,052 167821105 135947,965 117,049,315 Artnanallly IL%nsmined conaibudoas as a pax...pod Levered esq:dore.pa.aoli 19.35% 21.30% 22.51% 21.03% 21.62% 26.02% Ar5us1s comibminos as a perceIDagp. of covered eacp]oyee paro8 15.75% 11.62% 15.22%. 1436% 1493% 1495% 2006 7467 1996 Asquiredcmatribarion 5 13,452,615 $ 14,635,051 $ 154411.931 A44: co55u15554 5 13.451615 14.035.051 15.448,934 Cenbeoubon dada, C90e0e0Employee pss500 91.156,667 106141,731 146947,733 Arbanallg determined sommbutio ss as a percentage of covered mpboyes Far 1 13.76% 13.74% 10.96% Ramis conuibulions as a permaig of covered emp'.oyee payroll 13.76% 1314% 16.9651 2114% 16.691': 19 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 Cil..- of C'cryus CLnsti RE721011 32012110112333023003 3.341132 OTHER POST E1 @l01>12ENT 3E\-£1315 -.43212,520 OF 0,12221'4 P R W RE SS MIR EDEP 212612312£12 SP 3015 (6) 232e338e of .1 131323361 3323. .3.333.1 (1) Pl. 0) .13193591 16) 323331 .1319331 .13193391 ..e. .13rva6 km. 12633 to 139339 723192- of 3333-21 1032 1312.3 C 29-23.2 3369 Parrott Date A 1. 012121 (s)-10 4 RA hl O. el Port .393432933 02-3333 339 - Clicare 312029 - 11326238 00% 112423 74.323 277 01 312011 - 13333 00!4 1.3213332 51.961 1I%615 P.O% &12013 330013 303 3.190.911 6.938657 bah 093 Po31E3193391 E2.3e52 Play-Plbkr 22693 313032 2,366343 033. 3,536331 2330631 4-12, &12011 - 15.139.857 063 15,114,857 36.515439 19.03 312013 - 4361363 003 6461393 23.333330 157, 093 Post 03333393 N 72 Plan - F 3212009 - 13.137366 0314 11532313 13.917,134 3605 332011 435130n 0623. 530330 312013 - 1.550344 005: 3514,464 44.486;661 15.114 Total 11.421,525 OTHER POST 111PIAT]@TOE.VIITTSMANS 4A}1:1ER1Qrn C1233I23012I005 111 of 1333 (71 �We1HCe 11.90319 123933333 36.303.123(.11130. 13.31339. 1212m 0333 3212019 1.950.046 200363 34474 &12911 90.275 (29590} 164% 30112013 351161 117101 31.33 391931333 1012003 937.678 443.157 01.334 0112011 395.160 445033 15103: 312013 296.175 417319 141.13 Fire 34112029 033030 404361 39 33 155325 59;218 IGO 2, &12013 739135 26335* fi1154 20 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 Betweetaleemeginmeadmmhmminosam neileilehargdtoEmmon,asWhee Ce.mnme.lylemfe Besinemee,rarlivier. 52 tis: ,663446 2144 701,200 E enrymam� 6,4567 gaol l 5.436Go/centers 73,100 Strems 5859.424 Manna ivaw Slidmea i al'S' Ahs and recreauw 2202jd Intal I.ibranm 38,9,513 Museums emidenees 267,065 CCommie,.devwp®2 m t 2447204 Conan and vietors 6cshm 1,521,,462 Internal Trail ac. end 4 144030 5 25. 060 536 9. Emplomeent Retirement Weefie A. Plan Description, The City tabmpam m funding tmnr.nrmmiWmm asfollens4 (I) all C4 employee,. ehrept Eitefighlers. Wei*. Lc the Timm leaped Relimmant System C6197.21and (2)fneem a aarveipatem+8e Carpet Clines Pre Fighters Retirement Shmem TITS) The Cin'paruapem as me of 660Mans eelen®ti+ektional.iomtmohibmuy. hybaiddefmd!®441 plm davaslsaityrblSS_ GMAS isms agemymezmaty We Som mef®smd.a®n shied W aamdavaxiW rnlR.s Act Subtitle G, Tide 4 Texas Ceomomem Code (ee,Am) as m agmmmm€plm«mWoyer m�m hrsystem fox muosupal employees en the Stale of Tomah She TMRS Aral Ames We genes, admmhtrmm and mmagcmct m(dm 5yaem mita a sweacmber Board mfTsuseem. Although the Gown... fiscally dependent We Sart of Tens. 12.13,4 ts defined tee. emplan an is a aamiatiren Wander seceeo 471(2) of We haw. Nemec. Cmde.T101. awes a publicly available cramps tie mama(ramal report(CAFR)that®m The Cin cmtribmrer tip the 4PPS int firefighters is We Co.. Clarisd Flee Depamment. MS is a tingle motriMk.y,Schmid b®eStptam The benefit wet -Mons are am6aendkey the Term lecatFoe Figke,e' Amiremem Act 2LFPRA). UM, pmtidee We an3onty and peseta to amend beim. amo.mtaedq tmeoardonniaemafWe CmpusCaa4,ire Welter, liemmm e syme mm.Cmt.a 1 doehase access m momenta... asYn�twma .e regi®ereplanmm_ CFAS pipe a Amid -lime repotenema)m Gass Snemeotldo_ e7, ureawarm oto W.aty..,lingWecsh Fire Fights' Retirement rent Syst m mme eaasma, Smite 724,, comas Chia,, Team 264(4470, ra CiqtemPSWeesmap,Brefghams. s®efamoe-isicesaa adaFertdhe the mmemmg bdy often only, welsh the mimes available in the Mite snmree gowning Tbh0R. /Moment, Welsems61 mesleelatedas lithe 9 ofthe em0 Mya's cairns_ m W mteren, tied the etre financed menet. meths* interestwere to'Masa m ammmh.b.®tes may rtmmsetor =eW= m rehrem teemone off passes,op.. Member may m choose receive a patine ether 21 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 benefit a, a Pam., mammal oa6 hlywmen4a-hh cannot 75%ofMemmbr, hangInterest IheCity ammetiry�tre�,.dtuae tedSmrimL 14wm�rycredit, darnel� tp ll res � ., hbil�lay that the therm ge44salwaysham et� �c fima,ma thatd.membwa has always tem silmy . yralclahmt �a®t�56 p� ayes This alzmmaba�e iaceasedbyl�eachyear(�Me heforethe e�).�4meaYdhy�mymazrhrmendym effed. Ile mt� � actual aceomtbalmm4r,easedhythe actual -I:4 r,p�nralealmrffim®medwMeactmlralcola-gthe ®bwas match mems l plot Service credit) equal m Me diem®ie beenem the wMMt calculaton a. percentage eadop� IheC� mereanaMeam,amafh easel., efdxdve Sammy 1 of ealmaaa year, ata rale ecru, to 70% ad Me increase is fle Com—mom—Pa inlet —.Urbanamorous (LPI-Nbetwmmdm December preee.g Me member; renreemtdate and the ...serene year before the effective dm dMemeae minus aaypmiausy granted imw.z. to rs call refire at aa 60 and erne with 5 or mare years of service or nida 20 yam of senate regardless of age. Membersarevamd after 5 years. FFRS provides benefits m firefigbm:in then mm C'hrisli Pie Depmmamc.ile hem. are fulyhxteda%d 20 yeof wadi.,: aim.. Firefighters are at age 54 with 20 -years eApaaually posted rex& is provided far firefighters who fermate employment with at least[Obti lea:Mm 20yens,sen a It terminated firefighter has apaddally voted bee., be may retire starthgoe the daze he mould Lara both completed :0 years of semce If he had reMed a Calm firefighter and m..3 age 54 Ef ecnue hula I, - mmMty normal m�e Crumsaehremmt henefit,payableM Moat and1W'hm aeowrv,:goalm Me greater of(I)5➢.eMof 60-M1tmM man Payp.$I50.06per month fise ea. year of,.nam ,o years and ms, oo puma.. for each yea<ofse;a. A ren^T firefighter who u m least aa, M with at least 26 yearn of service has the G4i 4 Bled the Eleaoactme Deferred hmmem Opfian Mao plEIAO DROP) wich efisan. hwill pmide a lump sum I.ea redmnd momhly benefit. Mae reducedmmMy benefit is baudmthe •senice and Iligbes166M1mth Average Pay as if he had terminatedmapbymest mahis selected REMO OROPbenefit calculation data, which is ea earlier thea Me 1.111 et Me data he ram. the age A4 and 20yems ofserviee rsgmemms ma the elate.. prioryears m Me daoehe actually antes. Slpm redremea,Me member. rereiva,iaaddit®m hismonihly ammemto M benest, a lump sum equal e sum of (1) -the e aom am...e...how dm bee hs made to the Symemaftm Me RFIAO DROPhenefitealeulmun dale plasm Me mdl nf..arme by reer®mt benefit Me member mould have receiveabmwem Me RESRO ©ROP benefit caleulatimdate math datehe retaduader theplaa. There unto account 6almrm. The rump sumiscaledztedaz Ma-6:moFlemama., Ma, soon az d...,trafively Mame i:nopeansia(n amomade pertredremem benefit mucases. The System haz.Me amhmity tepaovide, and has periadaeallym the past monde& ad hoc pootredremeutbenefit arenas hfmbevahipin Me Pees pm�w® FeAmzTeta 176. 2,7 3,08,d Corm ®g Norm_ _ yfsa Total 56IG-ls dfm 22 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 Coamide dees 13185- Conmhutionrates 6xemployaminThl. are eiPoer5X6Ym 755 of employee ma, comma and de citymatm*mrteremmSm axe eider 10056,150 m 200%, ball as adored by the gwerem_hady ofthe W. Lndehe stale law ga..eTld, the mnhm run ihnti6s each city Is annually lyby de N R.S mg the Entry Age NormalLEAN) edamalco. method The actoaxially determined rare is the mtimated mount a marry b Tama the cost of helm. earned by employees dining tke year. with m additional amount to tonal anymtmld accrued Ha. Employees ford. City ofCeepusCW¢a®e remmedmw bwe 6% ofMeiaamual grossearmogs doing the fsscalyem. The City's wotiAAws b ThlRS for Me year ended September 30,2015, of $1.13,969,205 dud not opal de rammed brtoma of 124,925854. FF1L5 - The botiun am.ace+ of the System me author., by TLPFR.A. TiFFAA mouides the auWmity andproredure to change the ammmt of coneInMens Med as a percentage of pay by each firefighter and a peal epeym0 M the eitr- rrefighters for dr Cil ofComm auisa were rammed m connate 131% of thee mow gross gyu:ugs dm, de fiwl year The Ciy'x batons to FPHS fm de year ended September 30, 2015 ware $6x66 444. which egoaledde regmd coornbubms. Cmhrbutiw rates fm employe. and twthe Gtydmmg the Esd year were as bllor. lem.A.Lormwel Fire Eghters Retirement System Rewe®r5rstm Authoring esdbhslwg eemibibea obbmmon SlateL.Matrm Slate Legislation Frequency of combnimn Emmelly HmeeLly Employee's wmiberon armee. of emus) O ctober 1.20t4 -May 11, 2013 6.00% 12.0714 Ione 42015 -S.yt b.r30,2015 600% 1010, City's. lutim Mew. of um) O ctober 1, 2019 - lmary 1, 2015 15 °1 16% 20.78 January 22015-Septmber 50,2015 1696% 20.78, Cnf s coohibotivn 6ebb. 1, 2014 - September 30, 2015 (18,964.205 16266,444 D. Nell...on Liabilities the Gty's net pension Eabdaes fee bad plans were aerialed as ofDecember 31. 2019 and 8e Total Purim Laabdite.(T]i)aedm calculate de Nerrension LMM—nes were deAs®edby actuanal aatoatims ofthal date. Actuarial 3.momp4om The Toles Basun Labitites in 8m December 3i, 2014 amuerial aMuahom were detmmmd ming the &Mow , actomul assumplacoas 23 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 hhd, ram 3% 3.75% Chmallpagroll growth 3% 3'15% Inasmmt rte W name 71, net apenswo plan net of pennongar mclui, nwung mBatim ase mBation rapn=� Tiff. -salary ivaeasc were based, a venire-rdaad mbh. Mortality cabs (ocutive members.. retireen,. and henefvaaies were based on the gecdmdiairm RP2000 Corahua Heathy Mortality Table, wW male mm natftliedby 109% and female rata malWphedby 103%. Therates are paojecredoo a fully generational bass by scale BB m mmmt for future mndliWmprmmeut. For dsabldamuirmq the gmdmdatiuca 832000 assailed RAU. Mmsliry Tablet used. with slag.adio Actuarial a,mpdon used in de December 31, 2014, valuation were bored cm de molts of avmwial eonmrem:e sada. The experience Eh* valhIRSInasthemiatSanuary 1,2006. through t)eaember,31. 700S., Ens medal. the December 31, 2010, ‘4o.shon Hpmlmy post-mmement modality rah. and a®ty pmchss rates nmre ondatdbaaadmaModal* Par:mama. lmpatigatim Sndy.oneting21X91Wrnigh 2011. and dated December 3S20o e assmptims time 6n rid i a the Bei 31, 2033, vahmtion along tha e Fairy TAN) )acmcosi nalmethod Acssmptimsaamedmre tiewalh-s3u additional R.., mere dmade eNormal The long-term mpeamdrare of return, peas, pan imreuavnt Is 70% The pe s,pan's policy In regridto thallooaemof Amersted asset is stabl...1 mdmay he emendedbythe IbhiS Board ofircrels. Plan asa maogNm was Ore pMndannofimo,m mdu m sae.* the zhmtJnm and long-term t6mdm6 needs of ssas Mae la,tcrm ea -paced Tate Mret a,pemim plan ioacsm,t ora; demmined ming a Mdldmg-block mednd mwbiah bat cam caner of expected fatrerezl rata ofretmn(espectd mums, nn of pension plmmaesmmt �� and w0adoo) are developed t each mains etclass. These ranger are comdredm Produce 9mkog-wumpevved rale oframobytd],!og the rtw dfee real mN tmrehantyde target asset tion pa®tge and by aiding eonectrd tollanm The larger dlmoao aodberehwms of arttbroetc reil rat. of return for each major asset ca. are amm,a in the following Wile .Auer Clore, Tax gel Allocation trre ofxemr,ld Real Rafe is ego:, 3mmaEon, equity 115% 6.05% Lore fixed Income 30.0% LSO% Non-core fixed income IOW% 350% Aeal return 5.0% 1.75% Real est -are 10.0% 5_25% Absolute ammo 56% 425% Pmaaeumy 50% 8.50% icdl 100.0% TEAS - NorLbly rates were bared on the .geoderneiRP4000 Cmb;nea...ths Mord* Table for males and 6x femalaprojemea m 2024byscale AA peon on plan he.-esmmm iz mimed Lu eachbimwl arnwal Mon ad war dehrmioed mug a building -black Mod in whicheapena Stone e.t.a] rate ofretmo (expected retina, not ofper...ptm inv.:mem Ingyensxand mpation) are Meloped for ea eh maju asset 24 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 elms_ These eomponma, are combined to produce the Ione -team eapeered sate of return by xeiehang the expeetedfimm retail rates of retina by detergen asset allocatioupeacentaace (emently awdting in 4/4%) and by adding expected mGamn(3.73%). lnadth tion e final i 90%assvmpmn was seleamdby fle4otmdvg down" and thereby marts a reduction of0 O96for adowse Mon The tweet allocation and expected antlrmetic nut mil ram ofsetmn Ger each major ascot class are svmmarirsdi a the following mblet Asset C ss Target Allocation Lang-ierm£apeeted Reil Ram of Return M ithmetict .claims Lmee earldom.. 250% 577% Smnllad cone dumeaa:c 100% 602 :atomMimed imed 125% 612%% ...gang ma 60% 229% Real emus 10.0% 190% Fixed income 36.5% 1.64% Cash 4% 0.49% Too 1000% Discount Rate TAMS- The discount tae used m measure the Total Puntion Liability was TM. The Projection of cash 9mes used to determine 3e dscoure rate were hazed on the Cn"s present fomdmg ram. Based an dux assumption, de pace plan's fiduciary Net Position was projesed m be available to make all projected Me hmafit payments of current active and inactive employ.. Therefore, the lorg-texmeryected sae of Minn on pm,mo plan intestinenn was applied m ill periods of projected bene. payments m determine the Total Pnsionlubility. F'FR.S-]he discount rate and to measure the mdlpamm. EA., was 7.9%. Yopcojetw of cash Emirs was coed m determine de discount rate because the December 31, 2014 acueial vabutiun showed that expected comihutiom mold Pay the normal cost and amortise the mall.. amarial awned Lability ([SAAL)m23 years. That 13M1.was hasedao m advanilyalue of asset. that was 94.3 milhunlessthznde plan Ldwary normsition m oflhcember31,2014. Because o£tiu 23 -year ammammnpenodoflhel3AP.L with the Iowan -Ma ofxse6, the pemonplau's Sdrewynetroatiun isemected to be available b make projected finure benefit payments animus w active and members . Therefored e Img+m erexpected rate of Mum m pension plan im'mtmunRs of was appliedm all pmods of projected benefit payments as the drool... to demn:m.1 a total pend halo., Semitiripaf the net pension liabilities to changes w the macoent rate Mae following paesmtz the net penton labilmea of the City calculated ming the dzmud atm mdiethe aeluanal saluatm. a, well az the City's net pum habil, would be if were calculated ming a dzvmmt rite Abs a 1-percemage-poiw low. m 1-pacwagepmm hider dun the am. ram, IX Decrease in the 1% Imre.. in the Discount Rate amount Rate Diwomt Rate City'; net peal tiabiliry('T..) (60")$28"1$5 L031 (I.0%)$179,740,443 (a0%)596830,826 City's m pension halelity(PM)(69%)$...4:661 (79%)$74,973,183 (6.9%){36}46,6]0 Totd net pmwon hake.," $384,145,715 $254,715,626 $149,177,496 25 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 Pension Plans Fiducial Net Positions TTA RS — Detailed information about the ThiRS pension pima' Fiduciary Net Position is available in a separately issued MARS Sense sl report. That report may be obtained on the Intranet at na w-toaes.oren FFRS - FFRS isseres a stand-alone reporc pursuant to GASB StitemeurNo. 67, which maybe obtained lay writing the Corpus. Christi Fire Fighters' Retirement System et 711 N. Caramcahua, Scute 724. CorposCheisti Teras 78475. See that report for all information about the plan fiduciary net position Changes in the'` et Pension Liabilities AIRS Balance a 1'11 713 Change; far de year: Seraix carr hatisest €lifiemuee between expected and actaai erpenraee Ceffi7,ffion;emplaaxr Connliatiortswaplom Net imxADart insane Den+3t wymeat.iarlatagrefund; ofemployee axtrl,ations Admmisaatiae wenn Other damn Netrhaagr Balance at 12312014 ixarea (Lkenrae} Plan IntdPenaion fiduciary Sit Net P.1•1143. Liability Pasilian Liabiiry W) (h) (a} -(b) 796908,133 $ 621613,814 8 175,890,275 14,552195 - 14,552898 54,768161 - 54;768:64 (5,688997) - 0,660.9971 17,786,102 (17;786,1821 6_905,864 (8905,864) 35,519,832 [35519,832) (43538163) (43,538253) - (370605) 975,943 (30895} 30,493 20,124199 16174,175 3,850,164 817,028,432 $ 637)(7,989 i 179340,443 26 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 FEES Iermu(p.mne) T04IP33misa PWFd.oa., Net Nei ?maim limbslk Pmitin 6ubip (31434) Baburea11131:--011 5 191,2395 1 114179379 $ 71,134,357 Chaps 09123. 6eniee col 4,1/4217 - 4,144,71? 133-. 15,650141 • 13,640,148 C23166333933.49330,m - 4597,0448 46,007,0144 15394421343-443342, - 3135,456 (3,526750) 4063e.639991423432 - 6949416 (6,949,414) 7631479710.5.. 5,,hd,7 4233939 ofem9lsr,,631iom (11553717) (11,917311) - Admiti:mxieapme (515.317 :13321 A,, 109^42 115909 - 3113:66 3491032. 34334L4 :4, 196 1343247) 5a1.63 33/2313474 5 91 ;99414 1 7534'.4."1 3 --3'9743 E. Pension Empense send Deferred O31119344 of Resources and Deferred 19119.334 or Resources Related to Pennons Fos the yearended 5^9910(3413 2015. the ci4y1 093 d peau. expense 04526,624,313. Compaue 3 of p6a® £4penze 11.45 PK. Total Imnztcuss kmpleyee conlalMons pen ERE AMP. ofr) gene elmw®sin ofDefened 4,152,010 4,144,644 19,696912 54,764,46/ 15,650349 145449,412 109109641 (3276420) (10,431,620) (33,419,645) 159504961) (13,411939) (1,447,964) - 14441,6 1396,304 618,663 2,38,031 343.343343•34303 expense 370945 214,4 9 516,444 Other'^-�8n PAncia, Met Poston 311,413 ToTeW pension ewers^ :9493.39 :.13:.033 36,424}13 27 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 it September 70 ?015, the ntn reported deferred outflow; ofmrnneoer and deferred inflow; ofresomces seated to pennons from the fallow€ sources: TARS Total Defmed De6erred Defer. Deferred Deferred De.. and e - 954313041) S - S - S - 90,217,931) 46mdnafasmotas - - 275,261 - 274,261 maims - 2,441 191 - 8,8022,101 Camila sub axnaa m gal 3 2,01566 SI4-1'931) 5 7.,247 S 228.367.113 SIA,".',931) Taebail. f2 c Sbmionsby the Crtyb the Systems eornled mbsegaentle measmemenf date arlhe metriensoonlialeirties, December 31, 201416emYASeNmher30 1015 is a deferred outflow al -now -ea that mllbe r®fid as a reduetioum the net pension liab ,es m the fiscal year ' er1-a4 September 30. 2716. The. amomn m314,842,256 (12 25)a and P1,615.795(PPRS) 266.7716M ,459,753. INber amauma repmled as deferred 011113113 of re -,4.0240 and defined inflows of re4wmes relale0 m pensions will he rerogmeed m pension mise as follows: Year ended Sept_ eb 2016 5 147,16.1 S 6,18.603 S 795,707 2017 147,164 648.60 795,767 2018 258,123 6-18,602, 90,02,5 2019 ,996]28 648.6(11 2.234,91.0 2000 39.L05 38.105 F. Deferred Camp6l66167 Plan The City maimamz respo,l=ibility kr rev -amine and apgming7 withdrawals fr® the lmernal Rename Code. Sechon457,Defmred Ca=me,.= n.., Plan. The asset of the Plans are repoad ma pension trust mne2 28 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 10, Post-Emploimem Health C are Benefits O 1.3 Sbn.ment No. 45: ceourting omi FmtrIM Hepom byImplyasfor Pastan ployammsBenah'rc ales clan Pmen' ons(OP £61 establishes amending ards forposheumsuent heae0 Thu smdarddoesmtre9me Smack!. of OP® Qeanse, bur any difference between an between e al required emnibntion (.41.) and the amount Graded dssiop the yearn regoi'sedm hareems MAR employees lmaneialsmmavtasmnimam (or decrarn)ni the net OP. obligawn Th City is requiredtorn au acme, awn at least once every two yens in mance with CASE 45 standards. The City'sla.s valuation is dated as ofAngur 1, 2913, and discloses bre follonang Plan Omer - nation and Funding Pa, - Employees *refire a,Employees*redre fromsheCity ofComas Christi, aodeligibledependenG and smvivem,are etipblero cave . participate iu the Citys health insurance programs at tlre'blender employee group rate a& is determined aonuaW byd24.4,7Coapns Chnsb and.. 4744416ythe CiyCmmL Renrees haae31 days melectm eedl iu Me City's self -fended, single -employer health mstwance plan (Gware, Gon ne Public S aferv, and Ciucne-Fire) iu which they memo participating az ttie lime of refinement unless 7,. stand a plan doom., m collective m bargaining agreemea. la elTort to reduce the Catys liability, rt ees who are Medicare -eligible have been mulled a separate Medicare mmarance plan and rte no longer e., bythe Crcv s groan Mace As Angus lma2013, a metalof102elimble retirees and dependentuere participating in the City's gaup healthprogram d etailed m Cana. and Cmcare ninmmin Cineare Public Safety. Cmaa Fire Fending election Total 65 202 The plan n faded one gay -as -you -go harts and manned 11,06,391 m claws and oAw cmh =Me fiscal year en,h4Septmher 30.3015_ The bunds. paythse chums and other costs are dmuM .part Gum retiree reams, whiehdo mtfdly corertheeesfa. Th plan is not aceom2dw as a host am...se an Irrevocable hes., owl been established. fund Me Plan. The plan doe not: issue a separate fulmciar report. Annual Cost and 2.et 01,6 Obligation The Cityannualother poseeanplovmant beeefi (0705) can 8s calculated based on the annual required aohibmion(ARC)ofthe employe,ammortal acmmallydemmniaim ammdmme whhtheparametersofGA� Statement 45 The ARL represent a level offloading tha0Paid m m ongoing basis, n projected. cm+veam. most each tencud. aanmhw any unfunded aceunialhabilitim over a xmod not to exceed 30 years. The C.'s manual OPER cost for each plan for the amen/ year n as Pollan Cinema Polhc Safety Pun Total Aral remnred cooMuton S 550,182 $ 291,175 $ 229,335 $ 815,512 14488464 oat OP. obligation 2Rl8,7l 70,6552 124,515 447,4182 ARE a$usmret (309,637) (80,818) (144.9!0) (535.5137 AomaI OPER cost 310,952 285,849 210,733 802404 matte (pay.m.yw.m:, basis) 87 222 263 MI 644 926 1 011454 lvcsease )!0 !ase) in net ORB obligation 2779,525 7543 (420,143) (204,050) Net 011223 obl.atm-begimoo avert 6.974.093 1.811.850 7.244.049 11.904.792 27e09114 obligroon-end ofv ar 5 7 158 411 5 1614.418 5 _447.446 5 11.780.74_ 29 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 area yen Tread 2.1aibrm.mon is as Polowz: Gsave Pubdc5vfav Toil Ci s Anma1901,12Cmt(A1C) 2013 157.207 7281.09 1133.062 $679,116 2024 (14 }) 6500]60 3282220 6209,501 /0964429 2015 03101751 1285,839 8210781 1847,0013 Parer.ye dAlaC emdamd 2013 -1308% 157.5% 1959% wA 2014(14 maks) 386% 154.. 45/10% wA 2015 211% 991% 3989% wA 2Fta1E130sliptioo 2013 $ 4021,012 $ 1,764411 5 2,62,192 $ 11,64,,645 2014 0 4928.63 5 1,911,050 0244,019 $ 11,984,'192 2015 $ 7,158,4181 1�4ne $ Remyl.6 5 11,,84742 Funded 5taa andFmding Pmt aaa 1be forded setas of Ile plan as of the lasrvahmeon dale of August 1, 2013, was as Mans. Artuauilarcm, liability A.ctu nal Take of plan assets UnfiIiahimd acmarul accrued c Safety Fun Total 1 3800918 5 4461663 9 3558944 § 11421727 5 3. BOP,318 5 4.461 663 5 3.558.944 5 11.6'_1,5'_5 Funded rano 0% 0% 0% 0, Covered payroll 1 60.938,657 1 28335,870 1 23,466,541 $ 122,061,076 llnfmded actuarial accruedlahilty as a pesmage6 emmedpayro0 62% 11794 152% 105% Actuarml,, uto.=valve estmata ofdmvales of reported amount. and as..implaum about the pwhabeNuf evelalmethn 6moi. Amrmm deter -named repsdmg the mt. of the plan.aedde annual .emi.ed cornonsof the City are snbgeai. me®a1 mssian as Jamal results m compared a past expecetioos and new aadmmes are made ahoy the future. 111 srhed4e of fading progress, presmmd as ,,meed snpplemema.y 0,4,,,,4,p. ballmveg the notes.,. masnam=al.nmmane,p,esems mallyenhmdef makontha shwas wb,9 Poe aemarlal vale of plan. acetsu imeamg decrea sag m.er eve ream,., bale nonan! xwedlubabfiefm 6vefrts_ Plan Changes The total .15145 actuarial accrued labilty for fatirzae, Public Sakty and Pare decreased from approabaately 1117 maim as of AIM I. 2011to approumaely 1119 minion as of Aogmr I, 2011 ibm reduedon u due to a combioaton of charge: in ...options and diff.erces bemre® pram assumptions and actual e:peees. afteresees caswg ardueooin theInclude a 27, reduction number rehmes parLemanng a Me Wmcam reamed health cacost heads, and reAacedchildyar retiree. Isannum. Dame wan oB etbya changer relarne antulama asnamphom became the City n ma mere g net,. premium. io312015 as was pimay assumed 30 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 Actuarial hied., and 4sn om., FL/m.1mm of henefi, are temor ma the eplan and Include she type of benefit le hate err the rilwnon datead Me pattern ofshmngbemes beturen the Lity and the plan members N then.. Acnwialedam. reflect a long tam persFeedve and employ methods and assumptions that are deigned to reduce de short tam aWahlaty m actouialacruedliabilitammd the act., vale ofasmt. SiaifiaMmethoda and amump4on.umd f this Mallon me as follows, tdeawemem Dae Auggt1,2013 Actuaiil imthlat d Entry Age Ammuabon Pend 30 yeas, Open Amurtiaum Method Level. Pemem of Payroll Discount rare 390, GPI 150% Healthcare cost TrendRare S5%rate,lX ultimate rate,96 yearrgade-m puled Payroll Gowth Rale 2X anwally 11. Risk 31eungement The City operates a tisk management program for makers' compensation claims liability claims and p,Raty insurance. la addition the CO operates an®vlom teuefia program wtieh iadedes Lk and hen. inawame. A matrons The City self -has workers' compmsa,m gmaakamo habilitm and lea0hbereLa. Purchased msmmze mm include Commercial property insurance ntha 5250 million limit on allperils anda$150 million ,mY no named steno, $75 mama airport liability. $b0 million of excess gmuMatyliabiMy insurance, $10 mann arm,. ofexcessgeneral liability msemce and statutory excess moan' compensation coverage Primary flood.,mam m -ides up to 5500,0. w md JebuilAons. All finds oftbeChn ypdopale M the pronram and make paynamts0! to the liability and mplopa Benefit Fwd based on an md s- u aoalysler addition, rte City of Craps Chas, prouihs c ehmave health mzeage [a employee; dey�dmemdcetireez. Cmwagebecomm of ec-Ma the 6rstday ofmploymentandsheplan has m... The Mated claims liability of$14,742,402 m September 30. 2015, ore.. 57,252.096 is dm within one recumem tz d Gmemv®n. tat Amo, Standards Both Statement No. 10 requires that w liability f daims h reported ifinfmmatim prior m the issuance of. financial mmemem= indicate that it is mohble Mat a liability has bean immed at the date of the Somme, tanawJh and. tlu amount oftbe loss can be reasonably gummedchanges intoe fund claims kabiliN ammmt for fiscal years 2014 and 2015 were: Began, at Clam. aan rural ram Changes in Clam rxeal Lttithy Esmaks Payments War End 2013-2014(14. hs) $ 12;281,158 $ 28,767,974 $ (30,114.513) $ 10.934,619 2014-2015 $ 10,934,619 $ 30,157,544 $ (26,349,761) S 14542,402 31 Questions ? COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT OR THE FISCAL YEAR NDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS .CCTEXAS.COM Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Exhibit Page Number Number INTRODUCTORY SECTION Letter of Transmittal i GFOA Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting xiii City Organizational Chart xiv FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor's Report 1 Management's Discussion and Analysis 5 Basic Financial Statements Government -wide Financial Statements Statement of Net Position 1-A 20 Statement of Activities 1-B 22 Fund Financial Statements Governmental Funds Balance Sheet 2-A 24 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position 2-B 29 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 2-C 30 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances to the Statement of Activities 2-D 35 General Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes In Fund Balance - Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 3 36 Proprietary Funds Statement of Net Position 4-A 38 Reconciliation of the Proprietary Funds Statement of Net Position to the Government -wide Statement of Net Position 4-B 43 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position 4-C 44 Reconciliation of the Proprietary Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position to the Statement of Activities 4-D 45 Statement of Cash Flows 4-E 46 Fiduciary Funds Statement of Net Position 5-A 48 Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position 5-B 49 Notes to the Financial Statements Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies 51 Note 2 - Budget Policy and Budgetary Accounting 60 Note 3 - Sales Tax Revenue 61 Note 4 - Property Taxes 61 TABLE OF CONTENTS Exhibit Page Number Number Note 5 - Deposits and Investments 61 Note 6 - Budgetary Data 63 Note 7 - Receivables 65 Note 8 - Capital Assets 66 Note 9 - Employment Retirement Benefits 68 Note 10 - Post -Employment Health Care Benefits 76 Note 11 - Risk Management 78 Note 12 - Operating Leases 79 Note 13 - Long-term Obligations 80 Note 14 Advance Refundings and Defeasances 90 Note 15 - Interfund Transfers, Receivables and Payables 90 Note 16 - Fund Deficits 91 Note 17 - Conduit Debt Obligations 91 Note 18 Commitments 92 Note 19 — Service Concession Arrangement for City Golf Courses 92 Note 20 - Segment Information for Enterprise Funds 93 Required Supplementary Information Other Post -Employment Benefits 94 Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liabilities and Related Ratios 95 Schedules of Contributions 96 Combining and Individual Fund Financial Statements and Schedules Governmental Funds General Fund Balance Sheets 6-A 101 Schedule of Revenues and Other Financing Sources (Budget Basis), Compared to Budget 6-B 102 Schedule of Expenditures (Budget Basis), Compared to Budget 6-C 114 General Fund (Development Services) Schedule of Revenues and Other Financing Sources (Budget Basis), Compared to Budget 6-D 122 Schedule of Expenditures (Budget Basis), Compared to Budget 6-E 124 Debt Service Fund Balance Sheet 7-A 128 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 7-B 129 Non -major Governmental Funds Combining Balance Sheet 8-A 132 Combining Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances 8-B 134 Special Revenue Funds Combining Balance Sheet 9-A 138 TABLE OF CONTENTS Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Visitors Facilities Fund Balance Sheet Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual Hotel Occupancy Tax Fund Balance Sheet Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual Public Education and Governmental Cable TV Balance Sheet Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual Redlight Photo Enforcement Balance Sheet Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual Parking Improvement Fund Balance Sheet Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual Street Maintenance Fund Balance Sheet Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual Federal/State Grants Fund Balance Sheet Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual Municipal Court Fund Balance Sheet Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual Community Enrichment Fund Balance Sheet Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Infrastructure Fund Balance Sheet Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Local Emergency Planning Committee Balance Sheet Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual Corpus Christi Community Improvement Corporation Balance Sheet Exhibit Page Number Number 9-B 146 10-A 150 10-B 151 152 153 12-A 154 12-B 155 13-A 156 13-B 157 14-A 158 14-B 159 160 161 16-A 162 16-B 163 17-A 164 17-B 165 18-A 166 18-B 167 19-A 168 19-B 169 20-A 170 20-B 171 21-A 172 11-A 11-B 15-A 15-B TABLE OF CONTENTS Exhibit Page Number Number Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 21-B 173 Corpus Christi Housing Finance Corporation Schedule of Net Position 22-A 174 Schedule of Activities 22-B 175 Balance Sheet 22-C 176 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 22-D 177 Corpus Christi Industrial Development Corporation Balance Sheet 23-A 178 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 23-B 179 Corpus Christi Crime Control and Prevention District Schedule of Net Position 24-A 180 Schedule of Activities 24-B 181 Balance Sheet 24-C 182 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 24-D 183 Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation Schedule of Net Position 25-A 184 Schedule of Activities 25-B 185 Balance Sheet 25-C 186 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 25-D 188 Seawall Improvement Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 25-E 190 Arena Facility Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 25-F 191 Economic Development Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 25-G 192 Seawall Debt Service Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 25-H 193 Arena Debt Service Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 25-I 194 Economic Development Debt Service Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 25-J 195 North Padre Island Development Corporation Schedule of Net Position 26-A 196 Schedule of Activities 26-B 197 Balance Sheet 26-C 198 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 26-D 199 TABLE OF CONTENTS Exhibit Page Number Number General Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 26-E 201 Reinvestment Zone #3 Balance Sheet 27-A 202 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 27-B 203 Capital Projects Funds Street Capital Projects Fund Balance Sheet 28-A 206 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 28-B 207 Balance Sheet 29-A 208 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances 29-B 212 Proprietary Funds Enterprise Funds Utility System Fund Combining Schedule of Net Position 30-A 218 Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position 30-B 221 Combining Schedule of Cash Flows 30-C 222 Airport Fund Schedule of Net Position 31-A 224 Schedule of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position 31-B 226 Schedule of Cash Flows 31-C 227 Non -major Proprietary Funds Combining Statement of Net Position 32-A 228 Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position 32-B 231 Combining Statement of Cash Flows 32-C 232 Internal Service Funds Combining Statement of Net Position 33-A 236 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position 33-B 238 Combining Statement of Cash Flows 33-C 240 Discretely Presented Component Units Combining Statement of Net Position 34-A 246 Combining Statement of Activities 34-B 247 Capital Assets Used in the Operation of Governmental Funds Schedule by Source 35-A 249 TABLE OF CONTENTS Schedule by Function and Activity Schedule of Changes by Function and Activity Exhibit Page Number Number 35-B 250 35-C 252 STATISTICAL SECTION Net Position by Component 1 256 Changes in Net Position 2 258 Governmental Activities Tax Revenues by Source 3 263 Fund Balance of Governmental Funds 4 264 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 5 266 General Governmental Tax and Business Fees by Source 6 270 Assessed Value and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property 7 271 Property Tax Rates Direct and Overlapping Governments 8 272 Principal Property Tax Payers 9 274 Property Tax Levies and Collections 10 275 Adopted Tax Rate 11 277 Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type 12 278 Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding 13 280 Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt 14 281 Legal Debt Margin Information 15 282 Pledged -Revenue Coverage 16 284 Demographic and Economic Statistics 17 286 Principal Employers 18 287 Full-time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function 19 288 Operating Indicators by Function 20 292 Capital Asset Statistics by Function 21 294 Miscellaneous Statistical Data 22 298 City Payroll Statistics 23 300 Retirement System Pension Data 24 301 Insurance and Surety Bonds in Force 25 302 SINGLE AUDIT SECTION Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards 305 Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance with Requirements That Could Have a Direct and Material Effect on Each Major Program and Internal Control over Compliance in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133 307 Schedule of Federal Findings and Questioned Costs 309 Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance with Requirements That Could Have a Direct and Material Effect on Each Major State Program and Internal Control over Compliance in Accordance with the State of Texas Single Audit Circular 313 Schedule of State Findings and Questioned Costs 315 TABLE OF CONTENTS Exhibit Page Number Number Schedule of Federal/State Expenditures of Awards 319 Notes to Schedule of Federal/State Expenditures of Awards 327 Government Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presented to City of Corpus Christi Texas For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2014 Executive Director/CEO LEM •E ■• COLLIER, JOHNSON & WOODS, P.C. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT March 31, 2016 The Honorable Mayor, City Council Members, and the City Manager of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas Report on the Financial Statements 555 N. Carancahua Suite 1000 Corpus Christi, Texas 78401-0839 361-884-9347 • Fax 361-884-9422 www.cjw-cpa.com We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as of and for the year ended September 30, 2015, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditor's Responsibility Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We did not audit the financial statements of the Corpus Christi Convention and Visitors Bureau whose assets were $1,523,872 and revenues were $5,463,033, the American Bank Center Convention Center Fund whose assets were $2,846,373 and revenues were $3,322,046 and the American Bank Center Arena Operations Fund whose assets were $3,125,952 and revenues were $2,652,685. Those financial statements were audited by other auditors whose reports thereon have been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for the Corpus Christi Convention and Visitors Bureau and the American Bank Center Convention Center Fund and Arena Operations Fund, is based on the reports of the other auditors. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. 1 We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. Opinions In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as of September 30, 2015 and the respective changes in financial position, cash flows, where applicable, and the respective budgetary comparison for the general fund thereof for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Emphasis of a Matter As discussed in Note 1.P. to the financial statements, the City has implemented Governmental Accounting Standards board Statements No. 68 and 71 related to accounting for pensions effective October 1, 2014. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter. Other Matters Required Supplementary Information Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management's discussion and analysis and the other required supplementary information on pages 5 through 18 and 94 through 99 be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a required part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management regarding the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Other Information Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City of Corpus Christi's basic financial statements. The introductory section, combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements and schedules, capital assets used in the operation of governmental funds and the statistical section listed in the table of contents are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. The schedule of expenditures of federal/state awards, pages 319 through 328 is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non -Profit Organizations and by the State of Texas Single Audit Circular issued by the Governor's Office of Budget and Planning and is also not a required part of the financial statements. The combining and individual fund statements and schedules, capital assets used in the operation of governmental funds and the schedule of expenditures of federal/state awards are the responsibility of management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used 2 to prepare the financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the combining and individual fund statements and schedules, capital assets used in the operation of governmental funds and the schedule of expenditures of federal/state awards is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. The introductory and statistical sections have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them. Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated March 31, 2016 on our consideration of the City's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City's internal control over financial reporting and compliance. 3 STATEMENT OF NET POSITION SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Primary Government Exhibit 1-A Governmental Business -Type Activities Activities Total ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments (Note 5) $ 176,550,430 $ 116,323,444 $ 292,873,874 Receivables, net of allowance for uncollectibles (Note 7) 13,915,577 32,957,935 46,873,512 Internal balances (258,331) 258,331 -- Inventories 1,930,136 717,455 2,647,591 Prepaid items 2,357,022 197,756 2,554,778 Restricted assets Cash, cash equivalents and investements (Note 5) 262,316,204 313,652,106 575,968,310 Receivables, net of allowance for uncollectibles (Note 7) 18,627,849 122,652 18,750,501 Other property 49,871 -- 49,871 Land and construction in progress (Note 8) 156,244,699 399,549,775 555,794,474 Other capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization (Note 8) 442,806,785 1,279,142,243 1,721,949,028 Total assets 1,074,540,242 2,142,921,697 3,217,461,939 DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unamortized loss on refunded debt Deferred outflows related to pension liability (Note 9) Total deferred outflows of resources 4,411,738 22,554,842 26,966,580 10,761,166 15,172,904 5,982,273 28,537,115 16,743,439 43,710,019 LIABILITIES Accounts payable 7,576,742 2,281,788 9,858,530 Accrued expenses 7,474,614 1,092,490 8,567,104 Accrued interest 3,803,541 9,114,030 12,917,571 Contractor interest and retainage payable 1,180,505 1,709,435 2,889,940 Deposits 1,234,083 2,356,535 3,590,618 Liability to claimants - escheat property 106,230 124,308 230,538 Due to other governmental agencies 790,987 -- 790,987 Unearned revenue 3,339,860 345,286 3,685,146 Current portion of estimated claims liability (Note 11) 7,752,096 -- 7,752,096 Current portion of long-term liabilities (Note 13) Long-term debt 32,529,720 47,949,884 80,479,604 Landfill closure cost 756,722 756,722 Accumulated unpaid compensated absences 7,372,689 1,894,541 9,267,230 Estimated liability claims, excluding current portion (Note 11) 6,990,306 -- 6,990,306 Long-term liabilities, excluding current portion (Note 13) Long-term debt 489,571,275 1,166,350,978 1,655,922,253 Landfill closure cost -- 27,418,022 27,418,022 Accumulated unpaid compensated absences 27,056,423 1,754,952 28,811,375 Net pension liability (Note 9) 50,451,195 254,715,626 Net OPEB obligation (Note 10) 10,942,020 838,722 11,780,742 Total liabilities 811,985,522 1,314,438,888 2,126,424,410 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unamortized gain on refunded debt Deferred inflows related to pension liability (Note 9) Total deferred inflows of resources 788,193 -- 788,193 3,035,432 3,823,625 1,182,499 4,217,931 1,182,499 5,006,124 Primary Government Governmental Business -Type Activities Activities Total NET POSITION Net invested in capital assets 268,379,713 768,459,800 1,036,839,513 Restricted for Vital statistics records retention 307,831 -- 307,831 Bond interest and redemption 1,344,500 2,457,383 3,801,883 Municipal and Juvenile Court 646,348 -- 646,348 Fire contribution trust 5,585 5,585 PEG equipment and facilities 1,786,069 1,786,069 Tourism (HOT) 6,105,090 6,105,090 Traffic safety programs 752,809 752,809 State and federal grant programs 988,412 988,412 Parks and recreation 2,629,415 2,629,415 Infrastructure development 1,696,446 1,696,446 Loans 14,086,807 14,086,807 Crime control and prevention 5,441,581 5,441,581 Business and job development 66,381,385 66,381,385 Tax increment zone improvements 8,254,453 -- 8,254,453 Public health -- 5,637,282 5,637,282 Law enforcement officers' standards and education -- 3,974 3,974 Construction of capital assets -- 11,931,593 11,931,593 Other -- 95,765 95,765 Unrestricted (931,11$,74 55,457,952 (37,650,817) Total net position The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. $ 285,697,675 $ 844,043,749 $ 1,129,741,424 STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Expenses Exhibit 1-B Program Revenue Operating Capital Charges for Grants and Grants and Services Contributions Contributions Primary government Governmental activities General government $ 20,095,432 $ 25,920,218 $ -- $ 84,364 Police and municipal court 91,069,002 13,916,904 1,991,283 306,244 Fire and ambulance 48,724,237 6,272,542 748,564 -- Emergency management 613,555 -- 225,248 Inspections 2,379,102 -- -- -- Streets 34,051,106 12, 894,106 -- 4,315,748 Health 5,940,977 2,297,734 2,065,969 Parks and recreation 19,928,692 3,246,304 2,532,070 1,288,269 Libraries 4,575,572 163,688 80,561 20 Museums 1,866,875 647,555 -- Community enrichment 5,851,215 9,829 1,082,854 709,000 Community development 13,365,023 3,768,579 1,172,603 879,905 Convention and visitor activities 16,228,430 4,417,120 -- Interest on long-term debt 16,378,266 -- 328,276 Total governmental activities 281,067,484 73,554,579 9,899,152 7,911,826 Business -type activities Solid Waste 29,152,032 37,475,401 Utilities Water 107,235,791 121,958,577 643,387 2,890,958 Gas 34,256,774 32,265,916 56,266 38,126 Wastewater 56,892,815 68,488,526 507,583 2,905,362 Airport 13,631,297 10, 549, 237 19,099 20,779,968 Golf centers 214,575 204,936 -- Marina 1,997,197 1,911,146 605,246 Total business -type activities 243,380,481 272,853,739 1,226,335 27,219,660 Total primary government $ 524,447,965 $ 346,408,318 $ 11,125,487 $ 35,131,486 STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Exhibit 1-B Net (expense) revenue and changes in net position Governmental Business -type Activities Activities Total Primary government Governmental activities General government $ 5,909,151 $ $ 5,909,151 Police and municipal court (74,854,571) (74,854,571) Fire and ambulance (41,703,131) (41,703,131) Emergency management (388,307) (388,307) Inspections (2,379,102) (2,379,102) Streets (16,841,252) (16,841,252) Health (1,577,274) (1,577,274) Parks and recreation (12,862,049) (12,862,049) Libraries (4,331,303) (4,331,303) Museums (1,219,320) (1,219,320) Community enrichment (4,049,532) (4,049,532) Community development (7,543,936) (7,543,936) Convention and visitor activities (11,811,310) (11,811,310) Interest on long-term debt (16,049,990) (16,049,990) Total governmental activities (189,701,926) (189,701,926) Business -type activities Solid Waste 8,323,369 8,323,369 Utilities Water 18,257,131 18,257,131 Gas (1,896,466) (1,896,466) Wastewater 15,008,656 15,008,656 Airport 17,717,007 17,717,007 Ambulance -- -- Golf centers (9,639) (9,639) Marina 519,195 519,195 Total business -type activities 57,919,253 57,919,253 Total primary government (189,701,926) 57,919,253 (131,782,673) General revenue Taxes Property taxes, levied for general purposes 69,730,902 69,730,902 Property taxes, levied for debt service 34,255,712 34,255,712 Sales taxes 89,126,468 89,126,468 Hotel occupancy taxes 15,110,411 -- 15,110,411 Unrestricted investment earnings 1,277,826 1,217,295 2,495,121 Payments from primary government -- -- -- Transfers Total general revenue and transfers Changes in net position Net position at beginning of year Prior period adjustment for change in accounting tor pension liability (Note 1-P) Adjusted net position at beginning of year Net position at end of year 14,953,233 (14,953,233) 224,454,552 (13,735,938) 210,718,614 34,752,626 44,183,315 78,935,941 405,040,842 834,379,921 (154,095,793) (34,519,487) 1,239,420,763 (188,615,280) 250,945,049 799,860,434 1,050,805,483 $ 285,697,675 $ 844,043,749 $ 1,129,741,424 City of Corpus Christi GASB 68 & 71 Implimentation Net Pension Obligation Net Pension Liability Deferred Ouflows: Contributions subsequent to measurement date Difference between projected and actual investment earnings Changes in assumptions Deferred Inflows - Difference between expected and actual experience Beginning Unrestricted Beginning of End of Year Year 40,497,097 (247,025,033) (254,715,626) 17,912,656 19,459,753 8,802,101 275,261 (4,217,963) (188,615,280) (230,396,474) 67,128,167 Restated Beginning (121,487,113) REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SCHEDULE OF CONTRIBUTIONS TEXAS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 * 2015 Required contribution $ 21,009,512 $ 24,362,494 $ 25,218,616 $ 22,769,666 $ 22,665,524 $ 27,872,623 $ 24,928,854 Actual contributions 17,100,193 18,330,551 16,832,574 15,541,644 16,101,720 20,302,711 18,974,205 Contribution deficiency 3,909,319 6,031,943 8,386,042 7,228,022 6,563,804 7,569,912 5,954,649 Covered employee payroll 108,555,179 114,395,501 110,562,068 108,260,052 107,828,105 135,847,965 117,949,385 Actuarially deteimined contributions as a percentage of covered employee payroll 19.35% 21.30% 22.81% 21.03% 21.02% 20.52% 21.14% Actuals contributions as a percentage of covered employee payroll 15.75% 16.02% 15.22% 14.36% 14.93% 14.95% 16.09% 2006 2007 2008 Required contribution $ 13,452,618 $ 14,035,058 $ 15,448,938 Actual contributions 13,452,618 14,035,058 15,448,938 Contribution deficiency - - - Covered employee payroll 97,756,667 106,042,731 140,997,733 Actuarially deteimined contributions as a percentage of covered employee payroll 13.76% 13.24% 10.96% Actuals contributions as a percentage of covered employee payroll 13.76% 13.24% 10.96% City of Corpus Christi REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS - ANALYSIS OF FUNDING PROGRESS YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 (6) Percentage of (4) Unfunded Unfunded Actuarial (1) (2) (3) Actuarial (5) Accrued Actuarial Actuarial Funded Accrued Annual Liability to Valuation Value of Accrued Ratio Liability Covered Covered Payroll Date Assets Liability (1) / (2) (2) - (1) Payroll Ratio Other Post Employment Benefits Plan - Citicare 8/1/2009 12,524,728 0.0% 12,524,728 74,872,277 16.7% 8/1/2011 - 1,224,232 0.0% 1,224,232 61,862,815 2.0% 8/1/2013 3,800,918 0.0% 3,800,918 60,938,657 6.2% Other Post Employment Benefits Plan - Public Safety 8/1/2009 13,584,349 0.0% 8/1/2011 - 5,139,857 0.0% 8/1/2013 4,461,663 0.0% Other Post Employment Benefits Plan - Fire 13,584,349 5,139,857 32,947,021 41.2% 26,515,429 19.4% 28,335,830 15.7% 8/1/2009 13,537,686 0.0% 13,537,686 23,847,834 56.8% 8/1/2011 - 6,351,600 0.0% 6,351,600 20,862,937 30.4% 8/1/2013 3,558,944 0.0% 3,558,944 23,486,591 15.2% Total 11,821,525 OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PLANS ANNUAL REQUIRED CONTRIBUTIONS (1) Percentage of Annual (2) of ARC Required Actual Contributed Contribution (ARC) Contribution (2) / (1) Citicare 8/1/2009 1,960,046 704,363 35.9% 8/1/2011 94,775 (79,992) -84.4% 8/1/2013 350,161 117,308 33.5% Public Safety 8/1/2009 987,678 443,157 44.9% 8/1/2011 295,160 445,823 151.0% 8/1/2013 296,175 437,319 147.7% Fire 8/1/2009 1,023,928 407,364 39.8% 8/1/2011 355,425 358,718 100.9% 8/1/2013 229,235 (142,356) -62.1% 94 City of Corpus Christi Depreciation expense and amortization of water rights is charged to functions as follows: Governmental activity General government Police Fire Emergency management Inspections Streets Health Parks and recreation Libraries Museums Community enrichment Community development Convention and visitors facilities Internal service fund Total $ 925,865 1,564,141 1,211,405 4,447 6,638 5,859,426 207,179 2,592,366 389,513 223,795 3,462,065 2,957,204 1,521,462 4,155,030 $ 25,080,536 9. Employment Retirement Benefits A. Plan Descriptions Business -type activity Gas Water Wastewater Airport Golf centers Marina Solid waste Total $ 2,683,368 21,701,880 11,635,386 5,159,587 73,100 540,454 4,739,698 $ 46,533,473 The City participates in funding two retirement plans as follows: (1) all City employees, except firefighters participate in the Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) and (2) firefighters participate in the Corpus Christi Fire Fighters Retirement System (FFRS). The City participates as one of 860 plans in the nontraditional, joint contributory, hybrid defined benefit plan administered by TMRS. TMRS is an agency created by the State of Texas and administered in accordance with the TMRS Act, Subtitle G, Title 8, Texas Government Code (the TMRS Act) as an agent multiple -employer retirement system for municipal employees in the State of Texas. The TMRS Act places the general administration and management of the System with a six -member Board of Trustees. Although the Governor, with the advice and consent of the Senate, appoints the Board, TMRS is not fiscally dependent on the State of Texas. TMRS's defined benefit pension plan is a tax -qualified plan under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. TMRS issues a publicly available comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR) that can be obtained at www.tmrs.com. The City contributes to the FFRS for firefighters in the Corpus Christi Fire Department. FFRS is a single employer, contributory, defined benefit plan. The benefit provisions are authorized by the Texas Local Fire Fighters' Retirement Act (TLFFRA). TLFFRA provides the authority and procedure to amend benefit provisions. The plan is administered by the Board of Trustees of the Corpus Christi Fire Fighters' Retirement System. The City does not have access to nor can it utilize assets within the retirement plan trust. FFRS issues a stand-alone report pursuant to GASB Statement No. 67, which may be obtained by writing the Corpus Christi Fire Fighters' Retirement System at 711 N. Carancahua, Suite 724, Corpus Christi, Texas 78475. B. Benefits Provided TMRS provides retirement benefits to all City employees except firefighters. Benefit provisions are adopted by the governing body of the city, within the options available in the state statutes governing TMRS. At retirement, the benefit is calculated as if the sum of the employee's contributions, with interest, and the city - financed monetary credits with interest were used to purchase an annuity. Members may choose to receive their retirement benefit in one of seven payments options. Members may also choose to receive a portion of their 68 City of Corpus Christi benefit as a Partial Lump Sum Distribution in an amount equal to 12, 24, or 36 monthly payments, which cannot exceed 75% of the member's deposits and interest. The City grants a monetary credit referred to as Updated Service Credit. This monetary credit is determined by hypothetically re -computing the member's account balance by assuming that the current member deposit rate of the employing city has always been in effect. The computation also assumes that the member's salary has always been the member's average salary using a salary calculation based on the 36 -month period ending a year before the effective date of calculation. This hypothetical account balance is increased by 3% each year (not the actual interest credited to the member's account in previous years), and increased by the city match currently in effect. The resulting sum is then compared to the member's actual account balance increased by the actual city match and actual interest credited. If the hypothetical calculation exceeds the actual calculation, the member is granted a monetary credit (or Updated Service Credit) equal to the difference between the hypothetical calculation and the actual calculation times the percentage adopted. The City increases the annuities of its retirees, effective January 1 of a calendar year, at a rate equal to 70% of the increase in the Consumer Price index — all Urban Consumers (CPI -U) between the December preceding the member's retirement date and the December one year before the effective date of the increase, minus any previously granted increases. Members can retire at age 60 and above with 5 or more years of service or with 20 years of service regardless of age. Members are vested after 5 years. FFRS provides benefits to firefighters in the Corpus Christi Fire Department. The benefits are fully vested after 20 years of credited service. Firefighters may retire at age 54 with 20 years of service. A partially vested benefit is provided for firefighters who terminate employment with at least 10 but less than 20 years of service. If a terminated firefighter has a partially vested benefit, he may retire starting on the date he would have both completed 20 years of service if he had remained a Corpus Christi firefighter and attained age 54. Effective June 1, 2015, the plan provided a monthly normal service retirement benefit, payable in a Joint and 100% to Spouse form of annuity, equal to the greater of (1) 50.8% of Highest 60 -Month Average Pay plus $150.00 per month for each year of service in excess of 20 years and (2) $137.00 per month for each year of service. A retiring firefighter who is at least age 54 with at least 20 years of service has the option to elect the Retroactive Deferred Retirement Option Plan (RETRO DROP) which will provide a lump sum benefit and a reduced monthly benefit. The reduced monthly benefit is based on the service and Highest 60 -Month Average Pay as if he had terminated employment on his selected RETRO DROP benefit calculation date, which is no earlier than the later of the date he meets the age 54 and 20 years of service requirements and the date three years prior to the date he actually retires. Upon retirement, the member will receive, in addition to his monthly retirement benefit, a lump sum equal to the sum of (1) the amount of monthly contributions the member has made to the System after the RETRO DROP benefit calculation date plus (2) the total of the monthly retirement benefits the member would have received between the RETRO DROP benefit calculation date and the date he retired under the plan. There are no account balances. The lump sum is calculated at the time of retirement and distributed as soon as administratively possible. There is no provision for automatic postretirement benefit increases. The System has the authority to provide, and has periodically in the past provided, ad hoc postretirement benefit increases. Membership in the Plans City Fire Employees Fighters Total Retirees and beneficiaries currently receiving benefits 2,789 297 3,086 Inactive employees entitled to but not yet receiving benefits 776 13 789 Current contributing employees 2,245 408 2,653 Total 5,810 718 6,528 69 City of Corpus Christi C. Contributions TMRS - Contribution rates for employees in TMRS are either 5%, 6%, or 7% of employee gross earnings, and the city matching percentages are either 100%, 150%, or 200%, both as adopted by the governing body of the city. Under the state law governing TMRS, the contribution rate for each city is determined annually by the actuary, using the Entry Age Normal (EAN) actuarial cost method. The actuarially determined rate is the estimated amount necessary to finance the cost of benefits earned by employees during the year, with an additional amount to finance any unfunded accrued liability. Employees for the City of Corpus Christi were required to contribute 6% of their annual gross earnings during the fiscal year. The City's contributions to TMRS for the year ended September 30, 2015, of $18,964,205 did not equal the required contributions of $24,928,854. FFRS - The contribution provisions of the System are authorized by TLFFRA. TLFFRA provides the authority and procedure to change the amount of contributions determined as a percentage of pay by each firefighter and a percentage of payroll by the city. Firefighters for the City of Corpus Christi were required to contribute 13.1% of their annual gross earnings during the fiscal year. The City's contributions to FFRS for the year ended September 30, 2015, were $6,266,444, which equaled the required contributions. Contribution rates for employees and for the City during the fiscal year were as follows: Texas Municipal Fire Fighters Retirement System Retirement System Authority establishing contribution obligation State Legislation State Legislation Frequency of contribution Biweekly Biweekly Employee's contribution (percent of earnings) October 1, 2014 - May 31, 2015 6.00% 12.20% June 1, 2015 - September 30, 2015 6.00% 13.10% City's contribution (percent of earnings) October 1, 2014 - January 1, 2015 15.46% 20.78% January 2, 2015 - September 30, 2015 16.46% 20.78% City's contribution October 1, 2014 - September 30, 2015 D. Net Pension Liabilities S18,964,205 S6,266,444 The City's net pension liabilities for both plans were measured as of December 31, 2014, and the Total Pension Liabilities (TPL) used to calculate the Net Pension Liabilities were determined by actuarial valuations as of that date. Actuarial Assumptions The Total Pension Liabilities in the December 31, 2014, actuarial valuations were determined using the following actuarial assumptions: 70 City of Corpus Christi City Employees Fire Fighters Inflation rate 3% 3.75% Overall payroll growth 3% 3.75% Investment rate of return 7%, net of pension plan 7.9%, net of pension plan investment expense, including investment expense, including inflation inflation TMRS - salary increases were based on a service -related table. Mortality rates for active members, retirees, and beneficiaries were based on the gender -distinct RP2000 Combined Healthy Mortality Table, with male rates multiplied by 109% and female rates multiplied by 103%. The rates are projected on a fully generational basis by scale BB to account for future mortality improvements. For disabled annuitants, the gender -distinct RP2000 Disabled Retiree Mortality Table is used, with slight adjustments. Actuarial assumptions used in the December 31, 2014, valuation were based on the results of actuarial experience studies. The experience study in TMRS was for the period January 1, 2006, through December, 31, 2009, first used in the December 31, 2010, valuation. Healthy post-retirement mortality rates and annuity purchase rates were updated based on a Mortality Experience Investigation Study covering 2009 through 2011, and dated December 31, 2013. These assumptions were first used in the December 31, 2013, valuation, along with a change to the Entry Age Normal (EAN) actuarial cost method. Assumptions are reviewed annually. No additional changes were made for the 2014 valuation. The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments is 7.0%. The pension plan's policy in regard to the allocation of invested assets is established and may be amended by the TMRS Board of Trustees. Plan assets are managed on a total return basis with an emphasis on both capital appreciation as well as the production of income, in order to satisfy the short-term and long-term funding needs of TMRS. The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a building-block method in which best estimate ranges of expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of pension plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce the long-term expected rate of return by weighting the expected future real rates of return by the target asset allocation percentage and by adding expected inflation. The target allocation and best estimates of arithmetic real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table: Asset Class Target Allocation Domestic equity 17.5% International equity 17.5% Core fixed income 30.0% Non-core fixed income 10.0% Real return 5.0% Real estate 10.0% Absolute return 5.0% Private equity 5.0% Total 100.0% Long -Term Expected Real Rate of Return (Arithmetic) 4.80% 6.05% 1.50% 3.50% 1.75% 5.25% 4.25% 8.50% FFRS — Mortality rates were based on the gender -distinct RP2000 Combined Healthy Mortality Table for males and for females projected to 2024 by scale AA. The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments is reviewed for each biennial actuarial valuation and was determined using a building-block method in which expected future net real rates of return (expected returns, net of pension plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset 71 City of Corpus Christi class. These components are combined to produce the long-term expected rate of return by weighting the expected future net real rates of return by the target asset allocation percentage (currently resulting in 4.24%) and by adding expected inflation (3.75%). In addition, the final 7.90% assumption was selected by "rounding down" and thereby reflects a reduction of 0.09% for adverse deviation. The target allocation and expected arithmetic net real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table: Asset Class Equities Large cap domestic Small/mid cap domestic International developed Emerging markets Real estate Fixed income Cash Total Discount Rate Target Allocation Long -Term Expected Real Rate of Return (Arithmetic) 25.0% 10.0% 12.5% 6.0% 10.0% 36.5% 0% 100.0% 5.77% 6.07% 6.12% 7.29% 3.90% 1.64% 0.40% TMRS - The discount rate used to measure the Total Pension Liability was 7.0%. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate were based on the City's present funding rates. Based on that assumption, the pension plan's fiduciary Net Position was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current active and inactive employees. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the Total Pension Liability. FFRS - The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 7.9%. No projection of cash flows was used to determine the discount rate because the December 31, 2014 actuarial valuation showed that expected contributions would pay the normal cost and amortize the unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) in 23 years. That UAAL was based on an actuarial value of assets that was $4.5 million less than the plan fiduciary net position as of December 31, 2014. Because of the 23 -year amortization period of the UAAL with the lower value of assets, the pension plan's fiduciary net position is expected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current active and inactive members. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments of 7.9% was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments as the discount rate to determine the total pension liability. Sensitivity of the net pension liabilities to changes in the discount rate The following presents the net pension liabilities of the City, calculated using the discount rates used in the actuarial valuation, as well as what the City's net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1 -percentage -point lower or 1 -percentage -point higher than the current rate: City's net pension liability (TMRS) City's net pension liability (FFRS) Total net pension liability 1% Decrease in the Discount Rate (6.0%) $287,351,051 (6.9%) $96,794,664 $384,145,715 72 Discount Rate (7.0%) $179,740,443 (7.9%) $74,975,183 $254,715,626 1% Increase in the Discount Rate (8.0%) $90,830,826 (8.9%) $56,346,670 $147,177,496 City of Corpus Christi Pension Plans Fiduciary Net Positions TMRS — Detailed information about the TMRS pension plans' Fiduciary Net Position is available in a separately issued TMRS financial report. That report may be obtained on the Internet at www.tmrs.com. FFRS - FFRS issues a stand-alone report pursuant to GASB Statement No. 67, which may be obtained by writing the Corpus Christi Fire Fighters' Retirement System at 711 N. Carancahua, Suite 724, Corpus Christi, Texas 78475. See that report for all information about the plan fiduciary net position. Changes in the Net Pension Liabilities TMRS Increase (Decrease) Plan Total Pension Fiduciary Net Net Pension Liability Position Liability (a) (b) (a) -(b) Balance at 12/31/2013 $ 796,904,133 $ 621,013,854 $ 175,890,279 Changes for the year: Service cost 14,552,695 14,552,695 Interest 54,768,864 54,768,864 Difference between expected and actual experience (5,660,997) (5,660,997) Contributions -employer 17,786,102 (17,786,102) Contributions -employee 6,905,864 (6,905,864) Net investment income 35,519,832 (35,519,832) Benefit payments, including refunds of employee contributions (43,536,263) (43,536,263) - Administrative expense (370,905) 370,905 Other changes (30,495) 30,495 Net changes 20,124,299 16,274,135 3,850,164 Balance at 12/31/2014 $ 817,028,432 $ 637,287,989 $ 179,740,443 City of Corpus Christi FFRS Balance at 12/31/2013 Changes for the year: Service cost Interest Contributions -employer Contributions -employee Net investment income Benefit payments, including refunds of employee contributions Administrative expense Assumption changes Net changes Balance at 12/31/2014 Total Pension Liability Increase (Decrease) Plan Fiduciary Net Position (a) (b) Net Pension Liability (a) -(b) $ 197,293,990 $ 126,159,233 $ 71,134,757 4,144,217 4,144,217 15,650,548 15,650,548 6,007,048 (6,007,048) 3,526,756 (3,526,756) 6,949,478 (6,949,478) (11,612,717) (11,612,717) - (215,377) 215,377 313,566 - 313,566 8,495,614 4,655,188 3,840,426 $ 205,789,604 $ 130,814,421 $ 74,975,183 E. Pension Expense and Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions For the year ended September 30, 2015, the city recognized pension expense of $26,624,313. Components of Pension Expense TMRS FFRS Total Service cost Interest Employee contributions Projected eamings on plan investments Amortization of Deferred Outflows - Liabilities Amortization of Deferred Inflows — Assets Administrative expense Other changes in Fiduciary Net Position Total pension expense 14,552,695 54,768,864 (6,905,864) 4,144,217 15,650,548 (3,526,756) 18,696,912 70,419,412 (10,432,620) (43,470,970) (10,000,967) (53,471,937) (1,443,064) - (1,443,064) 1,590,228 370,905 648,603 2,238,831 215,379 586,284 30,495 - 30,495 19,493,289 7,131,024 26,624,313 City of Corpus Christi At September 30, 2015, the city reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources: TMRS FFRS Total Deferred Deferred Deferred Deferred Deferred Deferred Outflows of Inflows of Outflows of Inflows of Outflows of Inflows of Resources Resources Resources Resources Resources Resources Differences between expected and actual experience Changes of assumptions $ (4,217,931) $ $ $ $ (4,217,931) 275,261 - 275,261 Differences between projected and actual investment earnings 6,360,910 - 2,441,191 8,802,101 Contributions subsequent to the measurement date 14,843,958 - 4,615,795 - 19,459,753 Total $ 21,204,868 $ (4,217,931) $ 7,332,247 $ $28,537,115 $ (4,217,931) The total of the contributions by the City to the Systems contributed subsequent to the measurement date of the net pension liabilities, December 31, 2014, through September 30, 2015, is a deferred outflow of resources that will be recognized as a reduction in the net pension liabilities in the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016. These amounts are $14,843,958 (TMRS) and $4,615,795 (FFRS) for a total of $19,459,753. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows: Year ended Sept. 30: TMRS FFRS Total 2016 $ 147,164 $ 648,603 $ 795,767 2017 147,164 648,603 795,767 2018 258,423 648,603 907,026 2019 1,590,228 648,602 2,238,830 2020 - 38,305 38,305 Thereafter - 83,736 83,736 Total $ 2,142,979 $ 2,716,452 $ 4,859,431 F. Deferred Compensation Plan The City maintains responsibility for reviewing and approving emergency withdrawals from the Internal Revenue Code, Section 457, Deferred Compensation Plans. The assets of the Plans are reported in a pension trust fund. 75 City of Corpus Christi 10. Post -Employment Health Care Benefits GASB Statement No. 45: Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Postemployment Benefits Other than Pensions (OPEB), establishes accounting standards for postretirement benefits. The standard does not require funding of OPEB expense, but any difference between the annual required contribution (ARC) and the amount funded during the year is required to be recorded in the employer's financial statement as an increase (or decrease) in the net OPEB obligation. The City is required to obtain an actuarial valuation at least once every two years in accordance with GASB 45 standards. The City' s latest valuation is dated as of August 1, 2013, and discloses the following: Plan Description and Funding Policy Employees who retire from the City of Corpus Christi, and eligible dependents and survivors, are eligible to continue to participate in the City's health insurance programs at the "blended" employee group rate which is determined annually by the City of Corpus Christi and approved by the City Council. Retirees have 31 days to elect to enroll in the City's self-funded, single -employer health insurance plan (Citicare, Citicare Public Safety, and Citicare-Fire) in which they were participating at the time of retirement unless otherwise stated in a plan document or collective bargaining agreement. In an effort to reduce the City's liability, retirees who are Medicare -eligible have been enrolled in a separate Medicare insurance plan and are no longer covered by the City's group insurance plan. As of August 1, 2013, a total of 202 eligible retirees and dependents were participating in the City's group health program detailed as follows: Citicare and Citicare Premium Citicare Public Safety Citicare Fire Pending election 74 65 63 Total 202 The plan is funded on a pay-as-you-go basis and incurred $2,676,391 in claims and other costs in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. The funds to pay these claims and other costs are derived in part from retiree premiums, which do not fully cover the costs. The plan is not accounted for as a trust fund because an irrevocable trust has not been established to fund the plan. The plan does not issue a separate financial report. Annual OPEB Cost and Net OPEB Obligation The City's annual other post -employment benefit (OPEB) cost is calculated based on the annual required contribution (ARC) of the employer, an amount actuarially determined in accordance with the parameters of GASB Statement 45. The ARC represents a level of funding that, if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal costs each year and to amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities over a period not to exceed 30 years. The City's annual OPEB cost for each plan for the current year is as follows: Annual required contribution Interest on net OPEB obligation ARC adjustment Annual OPEB cost Contributions made (pay-as-you-go basis) Increase (Decrease) in net OPEB obligation Net OPEB obligation - beginning of year Net OPEB obligation - end of year Citicare Citicare Citicare Public Safety Fire $ 350,162 $ 296,175 $ 229,235 270,227 70,662 126,518 (309,637) (80,968) (144,970) 310,752 81,227 229,525 6,928,893 285,869 210,783 283,301 646,926 2,568 1,811,850 (436,143) 3,244,049 Total $ 875,572 467,407 (535,575) 807,404 1,011,454 (204,050) 11,984,792 $ 7,158,418 $ 1,814,418 $ 2,807,906 $ 11,780,742 76 City of Corpus Christi Three year trend information is as follows: Citicare Public Safety Fire Total City's Annual OPEB Cost (APC) 2013 $57,207 $283,049 $338,862 $679,118 2014 (14 months) $304,160 $282,758 $209,501 $796,419 2015 $310,751 $285,869 $210,783 $807,403 Percentage of APC contributed 2013 -139.8% 157.5% 105.9% N/A 2014 (14 months) 38.6% 154.7% -68.0% N/A 2015 26.1% 99.1% 306.9% N/A Net OPEB Obligation 2013 $ 6,742,042 $ 1,966,411 $ 2,892,192 $ 11,600,645 2014 $ 6,928,893 $ 1,811,850 $ 3,244,049 $ 11,984,792 2015 $ 7,158,418 $ 1,814,418 $ 2,807,906 $ 11,780,742 Funded Status and Funding Progress The funded status of the plan as of the last valuation date of August 1, 2013, was as follows: Actuarial accrued liability Actuarial value of plan assets Unfunded actuarial accrued liability Citicare Citicare Citicare Public Safety Fire Total $ 3,800,918 $ 4,461,663 $ 3,558,944 $ 11,821,525 $ 3,800,918 $ 4,461,663 $ 3,558,944 $ 11,821,525 Funded ratio 0% 0% 0% 0% Covered payroll $ 60,938,657 $ 28,335,830 $ 23,486,591 $ 112,761,078 Unfunded actuarial accrued liability as a percentage of covered payroll 6.2% 15.7% 15.2% 10.5% Actuarial valuations involve estimates of the value of reported amounts and assumptions about the probability of events in the future. Amounts determined regarding the status of the plan and the annual required contributions of the City are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared to past expectations and new estimates are made about the future. The schedule of funding progress, presented as required supplementary information following the notes to the financial statements, presents multiyear trend information that shows whether the actuarial value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liabilities for benefits. Plan Changes The total GASB 45 actuarial accrued liability for Citicare, Public Safety and Fire decreased from approximately $12.7 million as of August 1, 2011, to approximately $11.8 million as of August 1, 2013. The reduction is due to a combination of changes in assumptions and differences between prior assumptions and actual experience. Differences causing a reduction in the liability include a 27% reduction in number of retirees participating in the plan, reduced health care cost trends, and reduced child per retiree assumptions. These were offset by a change in retiree contribution assumptions because the City is not increasing retiree premiums in FY2015 as was previously assumed. 77 City of Corpus Christi Actuarial Methods and Assumptions Projections of benefits are based on the substantive plan and include the type of benefits in force at the valuation date and the pattern of sharing benefits between the City and the plan members at that point. Actuarial calculations reflect a long term perspective and employ methods and assumptions that are designed to reduce the short term volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value of assets. Significant methods and assumptions used for this valuation are as follows: Measurement Date August 1, 2013 Actuarial Cost Method Entry Age Amortization Period 30 years, Open Amortization Method Level Percent of Payroll Discount rate 3.90% CPI 2.50% Healthcare Cost Trend Rate 2.5% initial rate, 2.3% ultimate rate, 46 year grade -in period Payroll Growth Rate 2% annually 11. Risk Management The City operates a risk management program for workers' compensation claims, liability claims and property insurance. In addition, the City operates an employee benefits program which includes life and health insurance. A. Insurance The City self -funds workers' compensation, general/auto liabilities and health benefits. Purchased insurance coverage includes: Commercial property insurance with a $250 million limit on all perils and a $150 million limit on named storm, $75 million in airport liability, $10 million of excess gas utility liability insurance, $10 million aggregate of excess general liability insurance and statutory excess workers' compensation coverage. Primary flood coverage provides up to $500,000 on specified buildings. All funds of the City participate in the program and make payments to the Liability and Employee Benefits Fund based on an annual actuarial analysis. In addition, the City of Corpus Christi provides comprehensive health coverage to employees, dependents and retirees. Coverage becomes effective the first day of employment and the plan has no lifetime limit. The estimated claims liability of $14,742,402 at September 30, 2015, of which $7,752,096 is due within one year, is based on requirements of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 10, which requires that a liability for claims be reported if information prior to the issuance of the financial statements indicates that it is probable that a liability has been incurred at the date of the financial statements and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Changes in the fund claims liability amounts for fiscal years 2014 and 2015 were: Current Year Beginning of Claims and Balance at Fiscal Year Changes in Claim Fiscal Liability Estimates Payments Year End Fiscal Year 2013-2014 (14 months) $ 12,281,158 $ 28,767,974 $ (30,114,513) $ 10,934,619 2014-2015 $ 10,934,619 $ 30,157,544 $ (26,349,761) $ 14,742,402 78 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT OR THE FISCAL YEAR NDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS .CCT EXAS.CO M City of Corpus Christi CITY COUNCIL Mayor Nelda Martinez City Council Members Carolyn Vaughn Brian Rosas Lucy Rubio Colleen McIntyre Rudy Garza, Jr. Mark Scott Michael T. Hunter Chad Magill CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2015 City Manager Ronald L. Olson Deputy City Manager Margie C. Rose Assistant City Managers Mark Van Vleck Jay Ellington, Interim Director of Financial Services Constance P. Sanchez, CPA, CPM Assistant Director of Financial Services Alma I. Casas Controller Judy Sandroussi Chief Accountant Martha A. Messer, CPA Prepared by the staff of the Financial Services Department City of Corpus Christi Barbara Bailey Rocky Barrera Eva Barton Adriana Berlanga Rose Bond Margarita Cruz Kim Galan -Flores Teddi Giggy Jason Gooding Hilda Mihalco Betsy Perez Melissa Sanchez Diana Silguero Judy Villalon Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Exhibit Page Number Number INTRODUCTORY SECTION Letter of Transmittal i GFOA Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting xiii City Organizational Chart xiv FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor's Report 1 Management's Discussion and Analysis 5 Basic Financial Statements Government -wide Financial Statements Statement of Net Position 1-A 20 Statement of Activities 1-B 22 Fund Financial Statements Governmental Funds Balance Sheet 2-A 24 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position 2-B 29 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 2-C 30 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances to the Statement of Activities 2-D 35 General Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes In Fund Balance - Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 3 36 Proprietary Funds Statement of Net Position 4-A 38 Reconciliation of the Proprietary Funds Statement of Net Position to the Government -wide Statement of Net Position 4-B 43 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position 4-C 44 Reconciliation of the Proprietary Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position to the Statement of Activities 4-D 45 Statement of Cash Flows 4-E 46 Fiduciary Funds Statement of Net Position 5-A 48 Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position 5-B 49 Notes to the Financial Statements Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies 51 Note 2 - Budget Policy and Budgetary Accounting 60 Note 3 - Sales Tax Revenue 61 Note 4 - Property Taxes 61 TABLE OF CONTENTS Exhibit Page Number Number Note 5 - Deposits and Investments 61 Note 6 - Budgetary Data 63 Note 7 - Receivables 65 Note 8 - Capital Assets 66 Note 9 - Employment Retirement Benefits 68 Note 10 - Post -Employment Health Care Benefits 76 Note 11 - Risk Management 78 Note 12 - Operating Leases 79 Note 13 - Long-term Obligations 80 Note 14 — Advance Refundings and Defeasances 90 Note 15 - Interfund Transfers, Receivables and Payables 90 Note 16 - Fund Deficits 91 Note 17 - Conduit Debt Obligations 91 Note 18 — Commitments 92 Note 19 — Service Concession Arrangement for City Golf Courses 92 Note 20 - Segment Information for Enterprise Funds 93 Required Supplementary Information Other Post -Employment Benefits 94 Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liabilities and Related Ratios 95 Schedules of Contributions 96 Combining and Individual Fund Financial Statements and Schedules Governmental Funds General Fund Balance Sheets 6-A 101 Schedule of Revenues and Other Financing Sources (Budget Basis), Compared to Budget 6-B 102 Schedule of Expenditures (Budget Basis), Compared to Budget 6-C 114 General Fund (Development Services) Schedule of Revenues and Other Financing Sources (Budget Basis), Compared to Budget 6-D 122 Schedule of Expenditures (Budget Basis), Compared to Budget 6-E 124 Debt Service Fund Balance Sheet 7-A 128 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 7-B 129 Non -major Governmental Funds Combining Balance Sheet 8-A 132 Combining Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances 8-B 134 Special Revenue Funds Combining Balance Sheet 9-A 138 TABLE OF CONTENTS Exhibit Page Number Number Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances 9-B 146 Visitors Facilities Fund Balance Sheet 10-A 150 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 10-B 151 Hotel Occupancy Tax Fund Balance Sheet 11-A 152 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 11-B 153 Public Education and Governmental Cable TV Balance Sheet 12-A 154 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 12-B 155 Redlight Photo Enforcement Balance Sheet 13-A 156 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 13-B 157 Parking Improvement Fund Balance Sheet 14-A 158 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 14-B 159 Street Maintenance Fund Balance Sheet 15-A 160 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 15-B 161 Federal/State Grants Fund Balance Sheet 16-A 162 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 16-B 163 Municipal Court Fund Balance Sheet 17-A 164 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 17-B 165 Community Enrichment Fund Balance Sheet 18-A 166 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 18-B 167 Infrastructure Fund Balance Sheet 19-A 168 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 19-B 169 Local Emergency Planning Committee Balance Sheet 20-A 170 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 20-B 171 Corpus Christi Community Improvement Corporation Balance Sheet 21-A 172 TABLE OF CONTENTS Exhibit Page Number Number Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 21-B 173 Corpus Christi Housing Finance Corporation Schedule of Net Position 22-A 174 Schedule of Activities 22-B 175 Balance Sheet 22-C 176 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 22-D 177 Corpus Christi Industrial Development Corporation Balance Sheet 23-A 178 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 23-B 179 Corpus Christi Crime Control and Prevention District Schedule of Net Position 24-A 180 Schedule of Activities 24-B 181 Balance Sheet 24-C 182 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 24-D 183 Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation Schedule of Net Position 25-A 184 Schedule of Activities 25-B 185 Balance Sheet 25-C 186 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 25-D 188 Seawall Improvement Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 25-E 190 Arena Facility Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 25-F 191 Economic Development Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 25-G 192 Seawall Debt Service Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 25-H 193 Arena Debt Service Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 25-I 194 Economic Development Debt Service Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 25-J 195 North Padre Island Development Corporation Schedule of Net Position 26-A 196 Schedule of Activities 26-B 197 Balance Sheet 26-C 198 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 26-D 199 TABLE OF CONTENTS Exhibit Page Number Number General Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 26-E 201 Reinvestment Zone #3 Balance Sheet 27-A 202 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual 27-B 203 Capital Projects Funds Street Capital Projects Fund Balance Sheet 28-A 206 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 28-B 207 Balance Sheet 29-A 208 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances 29-B 212 Proprietary Funds Enterprise Funds Utility System Fund Combining Schedule of Net Position 30-A 218 Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position 30-B 221 Combining Schedule of Cash Flows 30-C 222 Airport Fund Schedule of Net Position 31-A 224 Schedule of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position 31-B 226 Schedule of Cash Flows 31-C 227 Non -major Proprietary Funds Combining Statement of Net Position 32-A 228 Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position 32-B 231 Combining Statement of Cash Flows 32-C 232 Internal Service Funds Combining Statement of Net Position 33-A 236 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position 33-B 238 Combining Statement of Cash Flows 33-C 240 Discretely Presented Component Units Combining Statement of Net Position 34-A 246 Combining Statement of Activities 34-B 247 Capital Assets Used in the Operation of Governmental Funds Schedule by Source 35-A 249 TABLE OF CONTENTS Schedule by Function and Activity Schedule of Changes by Function and Activity Exhibit Page Number Number 35-B 250 35-C 252 STATISTICAL SECTION Net Position by Component 1 256 Changes in Net Position 2 258 Governmental Activities Tax Revenues by Source 3 263 Fund Balance of Governmental Funds 4 264 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 5 266 General Governmental Tax and Business Fees by Source 6 270 Assessed Value and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property 7 271 Property Tax Rates — Direct and Overlapping Governments 8 272 Principal Property Tax Payers 9 274 Property Tax Levies and Collections 10 275 Adopted Tax Rate 11 277 Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type 12 278 Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding 13 280 Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt 14 281 Legal Debt Margin Information 15 282 Pledged -Revenue Coverage 16 284 Demographic and Economic Statistics 17 286 Principal Employers 18 287 Full-time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function 19 288 Operating Indicators by Function 20 292 Capital Asset Statistics by Function 21 294 Miscellaneous Statistical Data 22 298 City Payroll Statistics 23 300 Retirement System Pension Data 24 301 Insurance and Surety Bonds in Force 25 302 SINGLE AUDIT SECTION Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards 305 Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance with Requirements That Could Have a Direct and Material Effect on Each Major Program and Internal Control over Compliance in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133 307 Schedule of Federal Findings and Questioned Costs 309 Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance with Requirements That Could Have a Direct and Material Effect on Each Major State Program and Internal Control over Compliance in Accordance with the State of Texas Single Audit Circular 313 Schedule of State Findings and Questioned Costs 315 TABLE OF CONTENTS Exhibit Page Number Number Schedule of Federal/State Expenditures of Awards 319 Notes to Schedule of Federal/State Expenditures of Awards 327 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 Introductory Section City of Corpus Christi March 31, 2016 The I lonorable Mayor Nelda Martinez, Members of the City Council, and Citizens of the City of Corpus Christi Dear Honorable Mayor, Members of City Council, and Citizens of Corpus Christi: FINANCIAL SERVICES Section 103.003 of the Local Government Code requires that municipalities have its records and accounts audited annually and that an annual financial statement be prepared based on the audit. This report is published to fulfill that requirement for the fiscal year Po Box 9257 ended September 30, 2015. Corpus Christi Texas 78469-9257 City management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of the information contained in this report based upon a comprehensive framework of internal Phone 361-826-3600 control that it has established for this purpose. Because the cost of internal control Fax 361-826-3601 should not exceed anticipated benefits, the objective is to provide reasonable, rather than www.cctexas.com absolute, assurance that the financial statements are free of any material misstatements. Collier, Johnson & Woods, P.C., Certified Public Accountants, have issued an unqualified ("clean") opinion on the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (City)'s financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. The independent auditor's report is located at the front of the financial section of this report. Management's discussion and analysis (MD&A) immediately follows the independent auditor's report and provides a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis of the basic financial statements. MD&A complements this letter of transmittal and should be read in conjunction with it. PROFILE OF THE GOVERNMENT The City was incorporated in 1852. In 1909, the City was organized under a City Charter and operated as a general law city until 1926, at which time a home rule charter with a commission form of government was adopted. The Charter was amended in 1945 to adopt the present and nationally predominant Council -Manager form of government. The City Council consists of the Mayor and eight Council Members elected for two-year terms. The Mayor and three Council Members are elected at large, and five Council Members are elected from single member districts. The City Council is responsible for passing ordinances, adopting the budget, appointing committees, and appointing the City Manager, City Secretary, City Auditor, and Municipal Court Judges. The City Manager is the Chief Administrative and Executive Officer and is responsible for carrying out policies and ordinances of the City Council, overseeing day-to-day operations, presenting an annual budget, and hiring all other City employees. The City provides a full range of services, including a combined utility system (System) consisting of the water, wastewater, storm water, and gas systems; garbage collection and disposal services; police, fire protection, and emergency medical services; the construction and maintenance of streets and other infrastructure; and recreational and cultural activities. The City is financially accountable for the Corpus Christi Community Improvement Corporation, the Corpus Christi Housing Finance Corporation, the Corpus Christi Industrial Development Corporation, the Corpus Christi Crime Control and Prevention District, the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation, the North Padre Island Development Corporation (which includes the Reinvestment Zone Number 2), and Reinvestment Zone Number 3. These are shown as `blended component units' within the City's financial statements. The City of Corpus Christi has financial accountability for the legally separate Coastal Bend Health Facilities Development Corporation and the Corpus Christi Convention and Visitors Bureau, both of which are reported separately within the City's financial statements. The City Manager must submit a proposed budget to the City Council at least 60 days prior to the beginning of the fiscal year (October 1s`), and the City Council is required to adopt a final budget by no later than the close of the fiscal year (September 301h ). This annual budget serves as the foundation for the City's financial planning and control. The budget is prepared by fund and department (e.g., general fund - police department). Department directors may transfer resources within a department as they see fit. Transfers between funds, however, need approval from the City Council. ECONOMIC CONDITION Local Economy The City of Corpus Christi is the eighth largest city in 'the State of Texas with a population of 320,434 as per the United States Census Bureau's website. The geographic location of the city on the Gulf of Mexico and the Gulf Intercoastal Waterway gives it one of the most strategic locations in the Southwest and has been important to its economic development. The Corpus Christi region has a varied manufacturing and industrial base. Major industries with headquarters or divisions located within the City's boundaries, or in close proximity, include industrial, petrochemical, construction, convenience store, banking, and financial services. The federal government also has a major presence within the area with a federal courthouse and the largest industrial employer in South Texas — the Corpus Christi Army Depot, which employs over 4,000 employees. The Corpus Christi Army Depot (CCAD) is a United States Department of Defense's Center of Industrial and Technical Excellence for rotary wing aircraft. CCAD is currently the largest facility of its type in the world and serves as a depot training base for active duty Army, National Guard, Reserve, and international personnel. The depot performs overhaul, repair, modification, recapitalization, retrofit, testing, and modernization of helicopters, engines, and components for all services and international sales of rotary wing aircraft. Additionally, CCAD is a critical asset to the Army's Organic Industrial Base because it has a unique set of capabilities in helicopter and component support essential for all branches of the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Patrol, and foreign nations. It has been critical in its support to aviation maintenance most notably with its sustainment of the UH -60 Black Hawk fleet, which remains the largest fleet of aircraft m the Army inventory. Two bases make up the South Texas military complex: Naval Air Station Corpus Christi (primary and multi -engine training) and Naval Air Station Kingsville (jet aviation training). The site of the region's third base, Naval Station Ingleside (base for the Navy's mine warfare fleet), which was closed in 2010, was sold in November 2012 by the Port of Corpus Christi to Occidental Petroleum Corporation (Oxy) for $82.1 million. Texas A&M University -Corpus Christi is continuing to grow and expand, both at its Island Campus and at the Momentum Campus that now houses sports facilities including the Dugan Family Soccer and Track Stadium. New student housing, called Momentum Village, opened in 2015, as did the expanded University Center. The Island University enrolled its largest class m 2015, with more than 11,500 students pursuing bachelor's, master's, and doctoral degrees in five colleges with a student -to -faculty ratio of 23 -to -1. The campus is unique since it is located on its own 240 -acre semi -tropical island. It is one of only six federal test sites for unmanned aircraft systems in the nation. Additionally, in January 2015, the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies at Texas A&M University -Corpus Christi was named as a lead organization of the state's RESTORE Research Centers of Excellence. The center guides research and restoration efforts in the Gulf of Mexico. Also in January 2015, the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board approved a new Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering with classes that began in the fall. The Corpus Christi's trade area consists of five counties: Aransas, Jim Wells, Kleberg, Nueces and San Patricio. Each of these counties maintains a solid and diversified economic base which contributes material support to Corpus Christi due to its location as a regional trade center and international shipping point. The Corpus Christi economy provides a diversified product market including metal fabrication, chemical processing, farm and ranch equipment, oil field equipment, cement, food processing, electronic and petrochemical products, fishing and seafood products, and more. The land in the Corpus Christi region has strong mineral deposits and rich soil with the principle crops being grain, sorghum, and cotton. The region also produces a large supply of livestock including beef and dairy cattle, hogs, and poultry. The oil and gas industry which had been a major factor in the growth and economic stability within the trade area, began to subside in 2015. Port of Corpus Christi The trade area's principal outlet for agricultural and petroleum products is the Port of Corpus Christi, which opened to world markets in 1926. It is located along the southeastern coast of Texas on the Gulf of Mexico approximately 150 miles north of the Mexican border. The Port's channel stretches over 30 miles and links the Corpus Christi Bay with the Gulf of Mexico. It is one of the deepest ports along the Gulf of Mexico coast with a channel depth of 45 feet and is currently ranked as the sixth largest port in the United States in terms of tonnage. The Port handled a volume of 100.1 million tons of cargo during the 2014 calendar year, an increase of 12.8% from 2013. The Port of Corpus Christi has many initiatives underway. Oxy is building a petroleum and distillates export facility on land owned by the Port of Corpus Christi that previously housed Naval Station Ingleside. This project is expected create 100 jobs when complete. Additionally Oxy and a Mexican petrochemical company, Mexichem, are jointly building a $1 billion ethylene cracking plant in Ingleside. The cracking plant is anticipated to be completed in 2017 and will be capable of producing 1.2 billion pounds of ethylene each year. The project is expected to create about 1,700 jobs during construction and more than 150 permanent jobs upon completion. The Corpus Christi Ship Channel Improvement Project is underway for further deepening and widening of the Port's ship channels. New docks have been added. In April 2015, Phase I of the Nueces River Rail Yard project was opened. This was a $17.8 million construction project that included a 9,920 foot long unit train siding capable of storing a full 150 car unit train siding adjacent to the Fulton Corridor Lead track that serves Port Industries. This new rail year will greatly improve efficiency of existing cargo movement at the Port's multimodal facilities. Phase II of the project is estimated to be $22 million and is scheduled to be completed by December 2016. A historic event occurred on December 31, 2015 when a ship carrying the first United States export cargo of crude oil in 40 years left the Port of Corpus Christi. This occurred as a result of the United States federal government repealing the 40 -year ban on the export of crude oil. Several large companies have located in the area around the Ship Channel. Tianjin Pipe Corporation — America was the first international investment around the Ship Channel. This $1.3 billion project represents the largest single investment by a Chinese company in a United States manufacturing facility. When fully operational, the project will employ 600 to 800 people producing 500,000 metric tons of seamless steel pipe. Phase One has been completed, and Phase Two of its construction has begun and is slated to begin operating sometime next year - employing more than 2,000 people during the construction phase. M&G is an Italian company located on the northside of the Inner Harbor adjacent to the Nueces River Rail Yard and is projected to be the world's largest polyethylene terephthalate resin plant and represents a $1.1 billion investment. The voestalpine Austrian Group is constructing a $740 million facility on the Port's La Quinta Trade Gateway. The planned facilities are designed for an annual capacity of around two million tons of hot briquetted iron and direct reduced iron and should employee around 150 people. Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC, a subsidiary of Cheniere Energy, is developing a $13 billion liquefied natural gas export terminal at one of their existing sites in the Ship Channel. It is expected to be constructed in phases and should be operational by 2020. Harbor Bridge Expansion After conducting a feasibility study and examining the current conditions posed by the Harbor Bridge over the Corpus Christi Ship Channel, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) iv moved forward with plans for the improvement and reconstruction of approximately 4.5 miles of the Harbor Bridge. The current proposed replacement bridge estimates a rise of at least 205 feet above the current channel (an increase of at least an additional 67 feet when compared to the existing bridge), allowing larger vessels to pass through the channel and thus increasing the area's shipping traffic. It is also expected that the bridge will have wider lanes and increased highway access to address current capacity and transportation issues. The Harbor Bridge will be the longest cable -stay bridge in North America. State officials believe the Harbor Bridge Project will attract additional job opportunities to strengthen the area's economy and provide safety enhancements to travelers. TxDOT estimates the project will cost approximately $1.071 billion and has set aside resources of approximately $633 million in addition to a $175 million contingency fund. It is a design - build project and not the traditional design -bid -build used by TxDOT. On January 8, 2016, the Federal Highway Administration released a Record of Decision (ROD) regarding the proposed US 181 Harbor Bridge project from Beach Avenue to Morgan Avenue at the Crosstown Expressway in Nueces County, Texas. The ROD approved the selection of the recommended alternative for the Harbor Bridge, as identified in the project's Final Environmental Impact Statement (Final EIS), dated November 2014. This approval completed the environmental approval process for the project. On February 16, 2016, TxDOT issued the first Notice to Proceed (NTP1) to the awarded Developer, Flat Iron/Dragados. NTP1 is described as a pre -design/ planning phase. TxDOT's current timeline anticipates NTP2, which is described as the construction phase, to begin in the Summer/Fall of 2016. Final acceptance is expected by the end of 2020. Tourism Corpus Christi continues to be a favorite vacation spot for visitors and is the fifth most popular tourist destination in Texas according to the Office of the Governor's Economic Development, and Tourism Division. The number one reason visitors flock to the area has always been to enjoy miles of beaches along Mustang and Padre Islands, the longest natural barrier island fronting on the Gulf of Mexico. The opposite side of the barrier island provides a shoreline for Corpus Christi Bay, the Laguna Madre, and the various bays and bayous north of the Coastal Bend which are ideal for outdoor recreation. Tourist facilities located within the City include: a multi-purpose arena, convention center, and theater at the American Bank Center, Whataburger Field - home to the Corpus Christi Hooks, the Double -A affiliate of the Houston Astros, Hurricane Alley Waterpark, the Texas State Aquarium, the USS Lexington Museum, the Museum of Science and History, the Art Museum of South Texas, the Multicultural Center/Heritage Park complex, the Congressman Solomon Ortiz International Center, and Concrete Street Amphitheater. These attractions are located in Corpus Christi's SEA District (Sports, Entertainment, and Arts District). This family -friendly area includes many of the City's popular attractions. Day passes can be purchased where residents and visitors are able to play and eat at multiple businesses in the SEA District. The South Texas Botanical Gardens & Nature Center is one of the Coastal Bend's major tourist destinations and leading nature tourism facility. Strategically situated along Oso Creek on v Corpus Christi's rapidly -growing south side, it is part of the city's growing Oso Creek Greenbelt system and is near the northern side of the world-famous King Ranch. The 182 -acre venue showcases 11 uniquely -designed floral exhibits and gardens, including the 2,600 square -foot screened Butterfly House, new 1,800 square -foot Samuel Jones Orchid Conservatory, and Anderson Bromeliad Conservatory. It is a key site on the Great Texas Coastal Birding Trail and in Corpus Christi, which has been named "Birdiest City" in the United States by the Audubon Society. Most recently Schlitterbahn Waterpark opened on North Padre Island in Corpus Christi. The first of several phases of development, Schlitterbahn offers visitors and residents alike a unique waterpark experience. Additionally, the Texas State Aquarium celebrated its 25th anniversary in 2015. It is undergoing an expansion project that will nearly double its size by adding a $50 million exhibit called Caribbean Journey which is set to open in 2017. The Texas State Aquarium was elected as the second best aquarium in the nation for USA Today's 10 Best Readers' Choice. The Corpus Christi area is also a renowned location for water sports and serves as host to numerous fishing tournaments. The Corpus Christi Marina is the largest municipal marina in Texas with the deepest water. It has 600 boat slips that are 72% occupied. Approximately 1,000 vessels visit the marina annually. During summer months approximately 25 to 50 visitors per day pass through requesting information regarding attractions, sights and waterfront excitement. Marina Office Staff act as Ambassadors to visitors on behalf of the City of Corpus Christi. Various events revolve around the Marina. Parades, rallies, seafood sales, World Class Sailing Regattas and other events combine to create an extremely busy waterfront area year-round. The City also boasts other successful sporting events including the Beach to Bay relay marathon and "Conquer the Coast", a 65 -mile bicycle ride that features a route through the area's coastal communities. Corpus Christi draws visitors through its multiple festivals including Buccaneer Days, the Jazz Festival, Dia de los Muertos, Harbor Lights, the Mayor's 4th of July Big Bang Celebration, and the monthly Art Walk located in the City's Marina Arts District. In 2015, an inaugural festival named "Fiesta de la Flor" was held in honor of the slain singing star, Selena Quintanilla Perez. The event was a success, drawing more than 52,000 fans from across the world and bringing an economic impact of about $13 million to Corpus Christi. The event is expected to grow each year, with more than 70,000 fans expected to be drawn to the area in 2016. Construction Permits The table on the following page shows the number of building permits and the value of those permits for the last ten fiscal years. It should be noted that prior to 2012-2013, the number of building permits included miscellaneous construction in addition to buildings, including roofmg, tenant refinishing, repairs, driveways, and site work. Additionally, the 2013-2014 information reflects 14 months of data: August 2013 through September 2014. In order to compare the number and value of building permits from 2014 to 2015, the 2014 amounts were annualized (meaning the 14 -month was divided by 14 and then multiplied by 12) so that both years would reflect 12 months of data. In doing this analysis, the number of building permits more than doubled in 2015 from 2014, and the value of those permits increased by 29%. vi This increase was a mainly a result of an increase in new commercial permits and permits for commercial addition/renovation. The analysis shows that after a year of relatively flat building permit activity, 2015 was a year of rebounded activity proving that the economy in Corpus Christi is not driven by only one sector of the market (namely, oil and gas) but is more diversified. (I) (2) Year Building Permits Value 2005-2006 5,989 $450,750,242 2006-2007 5,699 $503,027,247 2007-2008 5,118 $343,865,608 2008-2009 4,022 $286,139,536 2009-2010 4,052 $260,412,022 2010-2011 5,447 $376,894,414 2011-2012 5,728 $376,144,270 2012-2013 2,437 () $445,240,284 (1) 2013-2014 2,732 (2) $535,411,665 (2) 2014-2015 4,909 $589,543,493 Prior to 2013, permits included miscellaneous construction in addition to buildings, including roofing, tenant refinishing, repairs, driveways, and site work. The 2013-2014 information contains 14 months of data (August 2013 through September 2014) Employment The unemployment rate in Corpus Christi increased slightly from a rate of 4.9% in September 2014 to 5.0% in September 2015 according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. This is due primarily to the job losses due to the reduced production of oil from the Eagle Ford Shale. Those losses have brought Corpus Christi more in line with the national unemployment rate in September 2015 of 5.1%. Overall during the last 10 years in Corpus Christi, the unemployment rate has slightly increased — from 4.8% in 2006 to 5.0% in 2015. During this same ten-year time period, personal (per capita) income in the area increased approximately 36% from $33,904 in 2006 to $46,049 in 2015. Major Expenditures The government's expenses relating to "police and municipal court", "fire and ambulance", and "streets" comprise 61.8% of total expenses for governmental activities as reflected in Exhibit 1-B. Statistical Table 2 "Changes in Net Position" shows expenses by activity for the last ten years. The government's expenses relating to "police and municipal court", "fire and ambulance", and "streets" have increased as a percentage of total expenses for governmental activities over the last ten years as evidenced in the following table: Expenses as a Percent of Total Governmental Activities 2006 2015 Increase Police and Municipal Court 28.4% 32.4% 4.0% Fire and Ambulance 15.5% 17.3% 1.8% Street 10.0% 12.1% 2.1% vii In the case of sworn personnel, as in previous years, much of the increase continues to reflect a regional trend that has seen the salaries and benefits of police officers and firefighters growing at a much faster rate than those of other categories of public -sector employees. Additionally, the net pension obligation for the firefighters has increased from the prior year - adding to the increase in expenses. In the case of streets, the City Council has identified fixing the city's streets as a priority for last two years. Strategies have been put in place to identify the scope of the problem, how much it will cost, and a timeline for completion. As a result, the City Council has amended the financial budgetary policies to specifically address local/residential streets and arterials and collectors. Consequently, additional funding has been allocated to streets — resulting in an increase in expenditures as more work is being completed. During this same 10 -year period, charges for services, while continuing to increase in amount, have actually remained relatively stable as a percentage of total revenue. The reason for this is the relative increase in expenses related to services that are not supported by fees and charges (e.g., public safety); thus, as tax revenues have increased to support these services, so has the proportion of total revenue generated by taxes. Long-term financing plan/relevant financing policies During the fiscal year 2014-2015 budget process, the City Council approved financial budgetary policies as an essential guide to direct the City's financial planning. The City Council reaffirmed the policy to set aside adequate financial resources in the fund balance of the general fund to ensure that current and future services or operations would not be severely impacted by any economic slowdowns, emergencies, national disasters, or other unforeseen circumstances. The City Council's goal for fiscal year 2014-2015 affirmed the commitment to build and maintain a reserve in the General Fund "committed" fund balance of at least ten (10%) of total annual general fund appropriations to up to 25%. Uncommitted fund balance in excess of the 10% policy requirement may be recommended for expenditure by the City Manager. City management slightly increased the commitment in the general fund at September 30, 2015 from 16.5% to 17% of the total annual fiscal year 2015 general fund appropriations in accordance with this policy. The remaining balance in the unassigned fund balance at September 30, 2015, was $174,000. The section that addresses the funding level from the General Fund for street operations was amended to specify a specific percentage (6%) of General Fund revenue less grants to transfer to the Street Maintenance Fund beginning in fiscal year 2015-2016. Additionally, the policy was changed to transfer 5% of industrial district revenue from the General Fund to the Street Maintenance Fund. A new section was added to the financial policies for fiscal year 2015 to address the funding level from the General Fund for residential/local street capital improvement projects. The policy outlined that for three years beginning in fiscal year 2014-2015, $1,000,000 would be appropriated from the uncommitted fund balance of the General Fund and transferred to the Residential/Local Street Capital Fund. Beginning in fiscal year 2015-2016, 5% of industrial district revenue would be appropriated from the General Fund and transferred to the Residential/Local Street Capital Fund. The policy goes on further to say that in fiscal year 2020- 2021, 1/3 of one -percent of the General Fund (less grants and industrial district revenue) would be transferred to the Residential/Local Street Capital Fund. This percentage would increase to 2/3 of one -percent in fiscal year 2021-2022 and would increase to one percent in fiscal year 2022-2023 and thereafter. Another new section was added to address the funding contributions to the Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS). The policy states that it is a goal of the City Council to contribute the fully funded contribution rate to TMRS to fund the pension for general employees and for sworn police officers. The policy directs that an additional one percent would be added to the City's contribution rate for TMRS beginning in fiscal year 2014-2015 and each year thereafter until the actuarially determined fully funded rate is met. In 2016, the policy was amended to increase the percentage to two percent beginning in fiscal year 2015-2016 until the fully funded rate is met. The City Council directed the City Manager to budget at least $200,000 in fiscal year 2014-2015 as an operating contingency as part of the General Fund expenditures in order to further insulate the general fund's unreserved fund balance from unforeseen circumstances. A similar directive was made for operating contingencies in the enterprise, internal service, and special revenue funds. The remaining sections of the financial policies were consistent with the previous policy and included utilization of a multi-year budget model; quarterly financial reporting and monitoring; the use of nonrecurring revenue to fund one-time expenditures; adherence to the City's Debt Management Policy; continuation of a 10 -year capital improvement plan; and utilization of zero - based budgeting type of process for completion of the operating budget. Major Initiatives The City of Corpus Christi has adopted a mission statement which has become an integral part in the development of a strategic plan to guide the City. The mission of the City of Corpus Christi is to deliver municipal services which meet the vital health, safety, and general welfare needs of its residents and which sustain and improve their quality of life. As we work to achieve this mission, we will employ fiscal discipline, continuous improvement, first-rate customer service, and straightforward communication. In this work, we will tolerate no mediocrity. The City Council's priorities/major initiatives for 2015 provide guidance and vision in fulfilling the City's mission and strategic plan. These priorities include: (1) residential road repair; (2) water policy; and (3) economic development policy. The first 2015 priority for the City Council is to provide sustainable, sufficient annual funding of a realistic residential road repair and maintenance program, including curb and gutter projects. Initiatives to address this priority include presentation of seven briefings to the City Council throughout 2015 to address the various topics dealing with the condition of the streets and funding options for residential streets. Many funding options were discussed such as the issuance of general obligation bonds, renewal of a dedicated sales tax to address street repair, and amending the City Charter to allow property taxes to be dedicated for residential streets. An ix Ad Hoc Residential Street Infrastructure Advisory Committee was created to address this issue as well and will provide recommendations to the City Council by early summer 2016. The second City Council priority deals with developing a long-term water policy. Strategies for this priority include the continuation of water supply development; alignment of water and wastewater strategies with a focus on a consolidated wastewater plant and a solution for the sanitary system overflow (SSO) issue; educating citizens on water supply and water supply strategies; reviewing and governance of the utility rate model; and development of a revised drought contingency plan and drought determination criteria. In addressing water supply development, discussions have begun involving evaluating other sources of water such as desalination, brackish water, effluent, and water storage. Mary Rhodes Pipeline Phase 2, which will draw water from the Lower Colorado River, is scheduled for completion by the summer of 2016. This project will provide another water source for Corpus Christi and its region in addition to Lake Corpus Christi, the Choke Canyon Reservoir, and Lake Texana. Long-term planning for water conservation and reuse are also being discussed. The third City Council priority deals with developing an economic development policy. The City has been working on a targeted economic development policy to recruit desired business niches, develop area -specific plans using tailored incentives, incentivize downtown growth, and address affordable housing/homelessness issues - while expanding diversity of business and retaining and growing existing businesses. Additional strategies include aligning the policies of the Corpus Christi Regional Economic Development Corporation (CCREDC) with those of the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation (Type A Board); creating policy guidelines to create infill a housing incentive program; and bringing new businesses to City Council District 3. Three status reports on the economic development initiatives were presented to the City Council in 2015. Strategies to address expanding local businesses included completion of a study conducted by the CCREDC to address diversifying the City's business base; the updating of Type A guidelines; and the renewal of the City's contract with the CCREDC. Additionally, the Type A Board awarded four incentive agreements in 2015 to incentivize businesses to expand and create additional jobs for the community. In August 2015, the City Council approved the "Homeless Solutions, Visions & Strategies", and a Homeless Advisory Council was created. Additionally, $200,000 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds were utilized for the coordination of homeless services. In reference to affordable housing, multiple City Council workshops were held in 2015. The Type A Board and the City Council approved funding $100,000 for a Housing Pilot Project. Funds were also given to the Housing Authority for both new and rehabilitated units. Additional strategies to address the City Council's priority dealing with economic development include the development of Plan CC Comprehensive Plan 2015 and the utilization of Type A funds assist in the opening of six new businesses in City Council District 3. AWARDS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Awards The City of Corpus Christi was honored in 2015 with a "Playful City USA" designation for the second time since 2009. The national recognition program honors cities and towns across the x country for making their cities more playable. Corpus Christi is committed to making play accessible through hike and bike trails, recreational programs, and after-school programs to enrich the lives of children in the community. Corpus Christi also was named the 19th most family -friendly place to live out of the nation's 150 most populated cities by KaBOOM!. The ranking was based on factors such as family activities, health and safety, education and child care, affordability, and socioeconomic environment such as divorce and unemployment rates. Corpus Christi had its highest rating in education and child care and also ranked the third most playgrounds per capita. The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Corpus Christi for its comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR) for the 14 -months ended September 30, 2014, continuing to confirm compliance with both Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and legal requirements. This was the thirty-second consecutive year that the City has received this prestigious award. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that this CAFR continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program's requirements, and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate. The City also received the GFOA's Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for its annual budget document for the fiscal year 2014. The City has received twenty-four of these awards. In order to qualify for the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award, the government's budget document was judged to be proficient as a policy document, a financial plan, an operations guide, and a communications device. Acknowledgments The preparation of this report is possible only because of the dedication of the staff members in the Department of Financial Services. Special thanks must be given to John Shepherd and Craig Mlady with Collier, Johnson, and Woods, P.C. who tirelessly and patiently worked with City staff in conducting the audit and producing the CAFR. Credit must also be given to the Mayor and City Council for their unfailing support for maintaining the highest standards of professionalism in the management of the City of Corpus Christi and the prudent financial policies to which it subscribes. Respect submitted, Olson ager (a e Constance P. Sanchez, CPA, CPM Director of Financial Services xi CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 G� Government Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presented to City of Corpus Christi Texas For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2014 Executive Director/CEO Executive Liaison for special Projects Esther Velazquez 826-3093 / 1 /Intergovernmental, Relations Tom Tagliabue 826-3850 City of Corpus Christi Organizational Chart Deputy City Manager Margie Rose 826-3220 Health District Annette Rodriguez 851-7205 County Judge City Council 826-3105 1 City Manager Ronald L. Olson 826-3220 City Secretary Rebecca Huerta 826-3105 City Auditor Arlena Sones 826-3659 Municipal Court Judicial, Hon. Gail Loeb 886-2520 J Finance Constance Sanchez 826-3227 Office of Management & Budget ■ 1 Budget Eddie Houlihan Assistant 826-3792 Strategic Management Saundra Thaxton Assistant 826-3682 Human Resources Yasmine Chapman 826-3315 M.I.S. Belinda Mercado 826-3740 Court Adm inistration Interim Terry Teri 886-2515 ACM Mark Van Vleck Public Works Valerie Gray m[ Executive Director 826-3729 Utilities & Development Executive Director VACANT xiv Street Operations Andy Leal -Acting 857-1875 Engineering Services Jeffrey Edmonds 826-3500 Water & Utilities Interim Dan Grimsbo 826-1874 Development Services Interim Dan McGinn 826-3595 Solid Waste Operations Lawrence Mikolajczyk 826-1972 Gas Interim Bill Mahaffey 885-6924 Fire Chief Robert Rocha 826-3932 Emergency Operations Center Billy Delgado 826-1106 Police Chief Mike Markle 886-2604 / 1 City Attorney Miles Risley 826-3360 ■ Risk Management Gilbert Sanchez Manager 826-3739 1 Human Relations Sylvia Wilson Administrator 826-3196 Animal Control Capt. Chris White 826-4602 ■ / 1 Code Enforcement Capt David Blackmon 886-2691 / 1 Communications, Media Relation & eGovernment Kim Womack 826-3210 1 ACM Interim Jay Ellington /Housing & Community Development Rudy Bentancourt 826-3044 Parks & Recreation Interim Stacie Talbert Anaya 826-3464 / Libraries Laura Garcia 826-7070 Municipal Marina Peter Davidson Superintendent Airport Fred Segundo 289-0171 Facilities Interim Edgar Leonard 826-3567 Fleet Jim Davis 857-1909 ■ /Business Liaison, Alyssa Barrera 826-3356 i Economic Development 882-2363 ■ Downtown Management District 882-2363 1 Convention & Visitors Bureau 881-1888 ■ / American Bank Center 826-4700 ■ Museum 826-2660 Financial Section COLLIER, JOHNSON & WOODS, P.C. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT March 31, 2016 The Honorable Mayor, City Council Members, and the City Manager of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas Report on the Financial Statements 555 N. Carancahua Suite 1000 Corpus Christi, Texas 78401-0839 361-884-9347 • Fax 361-884-9422 www.cjw-cpa.com We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as of and for the year ended September 30, 2015, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditor's Responsibility Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We did not audit the financial statements of the Corpus Christi Convention and Visitors Bureau whose assets were $1,523,872 and revenues were $5,463,033, the American Bank Center Convention Center Fund whose assets were $2,846,373 and revenues were $3,322,046 and the American Bank Center Arena Operations Fund whose assets were $3,125,952 and revenues were $2,652,685. Those fmancial statements were audited by other auditors whose reports thereon have been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for the Corpus Christi Convention and Visitors Bureau and the American Bank Center Convention Center Fund and Arena Operations Fund, is based on the reports of the other auditors. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the fmancial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. 1 We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. Opinions In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as of September 30, 2015 and the respective changes in financial position, cash flows, where applicable, and the respective budgetary comparison for the general fund thereof for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Emphasis of a Matter As discussed in Note 1.P. to the financial statements, the City has implemented Governmental Accounting Standards board Statements No. 68 and 71 related to accounting for pensions effective October 1, 2014. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter. Other Matters Required Supplementary Information Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management's discussion and analysis and the other required supplementary information on pages 5 through 18 and 94 through 99 be presented to supplement the basic fmancial statements. Such information, although not a required part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management regarding the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Other Information Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City of Corpus Christi's basic financial statements. The introductory section, combining and individual nonmajor fund fmancial statements and schedules, capital assets used in the operation of governmental funds and the statistical section listed in the table of contents are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. The schedule of expenditures of federal/state awards, pages 319 through 328 is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non -Profit Organizations and by the State of Texas Single Audit Circular issued by the Governor's Office of Budget and Planning and is also not a required part of the financial statements. The combining and individual fund statements and schedules, capital assets used in the operation of governmental funds and the schedule of expenditures of federal/state awards are the responsibility of management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used 2 to prepare the financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic fmancial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the combining and individual fund statements and schedules, capital assets used in the operation of governmental funds and the schedule of expenditures of federal/state awards is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. The introductory and statistical sections have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them. Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated March 31, 2016 on our consideration of the City's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over fmancial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City's internal control over financial reporting and compliance. ettecotbia,g,ario oint_cco 3 City of Corpus Christi MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS This section of the City of Corpus Christi's (City) annual financial report presents an overview, through management's discussion and analysis (MD&A), of the City's fmancial activities and performance during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. During fiscal year 2014, the City of Corpus Christi changed its fiscal year-end from July 31St to September 30th. Therefore the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the 2014 fiscal year reflected 14 months of activity. Comparisons between the current and prior years will be difficult because of the different number of months reflected in each year. Therefore in order to focus on variances not caused by the additional two months, we have taken the fiscal year 2014 amounts, divided by 14, and multiplied by 12 so that two 12 -month periods are compared. The MD&A should be read in conjunction with the transmittal letter found in the Introductory Section of this report and the accompanying fmancial statements and disclosure following this section. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Entity Wide • The City implemented Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) No. 68 "Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions" and GASB No. 71 "Pension Transition for Contributions Made Subsequent to the Measurement Date" which resulted in a prior period adjustment that reduced the City's total net position by $188.6 million. • Total net position of the City, excluding component units, was $1.1 billion at September 30, 2015, an increase of $78.9 million, or 7.5% compared to September 30, 2014 as restated. Of this net position, 103.3% are net invested in capital assets and restricted — leaving a negative unrestricted net position of $37.7 million. • Total net program expenses were $3.2 million higher than prior year's extrapolated amount, reflecting net expenses of $131.8 million for fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 compared to the extrapolated amount of $128.6 million. • Total general revenue and transfers, excluding component units, increased $23.3 million from the prior year's extrapolated amount of $187.5 million to $210.7 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, an increase of 12.4% due primarily to an increase in property tax revenue. Governmental Activities • On a government -wide basis for governmental activities, the City had net program expenses of $189.7 million for the fiscal ended September 30, 2015, compared to $180.1 million for the extrapolated prior year, representing a 5.3% increase. General revenues and transfers totaled $224.5 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 compared to the prior year's extrapolated amount of $203.8 million with an increase in net position for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 of $34.8 million. At September 30, 2015, the City's governmental activities had $812.4 million in total liabilities compared to $738.3 million as restated at September 30, 2014. Business -Type Activities • On a govemment-wide basis for business -type activities, program revenue net of expenses was $57.9 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 compared to $51.5 million for the extrapolated prior period, representing an increase of 12.4 % from the prior year's extrapolated balance. Net position increased by 5.5 % from $799.9 million as restated as of September 30, 2014 to $844.0 million as of September 30, 2015. At September 30, 2015, the business -type activities had $1.3 billion in total liabilities compared to $1.1 billion as restated at September 30, 2014. Bond Issues • During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, the City issued 8 series of bonds. $90.5 million of general improvement bonds to fund 2014 voter -approved projects; $2.6 million of marina system revenue bonds to fund the replacement of docks; $93.6 million of fixed rate utility system junior lien revenue improvement bonds and $49 6 million of variable rate utility system junior lien revenue improvement bonds for construction of the Mary Rhodes Pipeline Phase 2; $101.4 million of utility system junior lien revenue improvement bonds for improvements to the combined utility system; $5.1 million of tax notes to fund projects associated with the Texas Military Preparedness Commission; $47.0 million of utility system junior lien revenue refunding bonds for a net present value savings of 8.4%; and $62.8 million of Nueces River Authority water supply facilities revenue refunding bonds for a net present value savings of 13.7%. General Fund • At September 30, 2015, unassigned fund balance for the General Fund was $175 thousand, or 0.09% of the General Fund expenditures. This compares to an unassigned fund balance of $11.5 million, or 5.0% of General Fund extrapolated expenditures for the prior year. It should be noted, however, that in the prior year, unassigned fund balance in the General Fund included Development Services. In fiscal year 2015, the fund balance for Development Services is reflected as assigned. Therefore, the fiscal year 2014 percentage of unassigned fund balance to General Fund extrapolated expenditures changes from 5.0% to 3.8%. • The financial policies state that the City must maintain a commitment for major contingencies of at least 10% and up to 25% of the total General Fund appropriations. The commitment increased in 2015 from 16.5% at September 30, 2014 to 17.0% at September 30, 2015 of the total General Fund appropriations or $1.8 million, a 4.6% increase from the prior year. • General Fund revenues for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 of $219.0 million were 7.3% higher than prior year extrapolated revenues of $204.1 million. • General Fund expenditures for the fiscal ended September 30, 2015 of $204.9 million were 4.5% higher than prior year extrapolated expenditures of $196.1 million. 5 City of Corpus Christi USING THE FINANCIAL SECTION OF THIS COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT This Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) has been prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) for local governments as prescribed by the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The City has implemented GASB Statement No. 1 through 71. The CAFR consists of four sections: introductory, financial, statistical, and single audit. As illustrated in the following chart, Figure 1, the financial section of this report has three components: management's discussion and analysis (this section), the basic financial statements, and required supplementary information. Figure 1: Components of the Financial Section Management's Discussion And Analysis i Government -wide Financial Statements i Basic Financial Statements v4 A 1 Required Supplementary Information 1 Fund Financial Statements v Notes to the Financial Statements Summary — Detail Figure 1 depicts how the required parts of this annual financial report are arranged and relate to one another. In addition to these required elements, a section with combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules that provides details about the non -major governmental funds and internal service funds is included. OVERVIEW OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The basic financial statements of the City of Corpus Christi are comprised of three elements: 1. Government -wide financial statements provide both long-term and short-term information about the City's overall financial condition. The Statement of Net Position and 6 City of Corpus Christi the Statement of Activities, which are the government -wide statements, report information about the City as a whole, and about its activities, in a way that provides information helpful in determining whether the City's financial condition has improved or deteriorated as a result of current year's activities. These statements are presented for both governmental activities and business -type activities. All assets and liabilities are reported using the accrual basis of accounting so the statements will provide readers with a broad overview of the City's finances, similar to statements used by most private -sector companies. Legally separate component units (Coastal Bend Health Facilities Corporation and Corpus Christi Convention and Visitors Bureau) are also shown in these statements. 2. Fund financial statements provide a detailed short-term view of the City's operations, focusing on the most significant funds in greater detail than the government -wide statements. The three types of funds reported are: ➢ Governmental funds — General Fund, Debt Service Fund, Streets Capital Projects Fund, and other non -major funds consisting of special revenue funds, capital project funds, the other debt service funds, focus on how cash and other financial assets that can readily be converted to cash flow in and out and the balances left at year-end that are available for spending. The governmental funds statements provide the short-term view that helps determine whether there are more or fewer financial resources to be spent in the near future to finance the City's programs. Because the focus of governmental funds does not encompass the additional long-term focus of the government -wide financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. Both the governmental fund balance sheet and the governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities. ➢ Proprietary funds — Enterprise funds and Internal Service funds are used to report services for which the City charges their customers, either internal or external, a fee. These funds, like the government -wide statements, provide both long-term and short- term financial information, however, in more detail. Enterprise funds are used to report the same functions presented as business -type activities in the government -wide financial statements, excluding Solid Waste Services, which is recorded in the General Fund. The City uses enterprise funds to account for its Utility System, Airport, Golf Courses, and Marina. Internal service funds are used to report activities that provide supplies and services for the City's various other programs and activities. The City uses internal service funds to account for Stores, Fleet Maintenance Services, Facilities Maintenance Service, Municipal Information Systems, Liability and Employee Benefits, and Engineering Services. Because these services predominantly benefit governmental rather than business -type functions, they have been included within governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. ➢ Fiduciary funds — The City is trustee, or fiduciary, for certain amounts held on behalf of others or, because of an arrangement, can be used only for the trust beneficiaries. 7 City of Corpus Christi The City is responsible for ensuring that the assets reported in these funds are used for their intended purposes. A Deferred Compensation Plan and a Private Purpose Trust Fund are the City's two fiduciary activities and are reported in a separate statement of fiduciary net position and a statement of changes in fiduciary net position. These fiduciary activities are excluded from the City's government -wide financial statements because the City cannot use these assets to finance its operations. 3. Notes to the financial statements provide disclosures and additional information that are essential to the full understanding of the financial information presented in the government -wide and fund financial statements. Following the notes to the financial statements is required supplementary information (RSI) that further explains and supports the information in the financial statements. GOVERNMENT -WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Net Position At September 30, 2015, the net position for the City of Corpus Christi totaled $1.1 billion, $78.5 million higher than the adjusted net position at September 30, 2014. The composition of the net position is $285.3 million for governmental activities and $844.0 million for business -type activities. The largest portion of the City's total net position, 91.8%, is invested in capital assets (e.g., land, infrastructure, buildings, machinery and equipment, and construction in progress); less any related debt used to acquire those assets that are still outstanding. The City has $130.0 million in restricted net position for specific purposes at September 30, 2015, which is a $22.5 million increase from September 30, 2014. The City's unrestricted net position is a negative $37.3 million at September 30, 2015 resulting for implementation of two new accounting statements described in the paragraph below. It should be noted that he City has sufficient funds to meet requirements for cash outlays in the next fiscal year without major reductions in fund balances. Effective for fiscal year 2015, Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 68, "Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions" created specific reporting requirements for pensions that are different than that used for funding purposes. GASB Statement No. 71 "Pension Transition for Contributions Made Subsequent to the Measurement Date" was issued as an amendment to GASB No. 68 and relates to amounts associated with contributions to a defined benefit plan after the measurement date of the beginning net pension liability. Implementation required the City to restate its beginning net position for the current year and to begin recording the net pension liability on the government -wide financial statements. Beginning net position was adjusted as follows (in 000's). (See Note 1-P of the Notes to the Financial Statements.) Activity Type Governmental Business -type Total Net Position 9/30/2014 $ 405,041 834,380 Adjusted Net Position 9/30/2014 Difference $ 250,945 799,860 $ (154,096) (34,520) $ 1,239,421 $ 1,050,805 $ (188,616) 8 City of Corpus Christi Table 1 reflects a comparative summary of statement of net position for the City of Corpus Christi. Capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation Other assets Total assets Table 1 Summary of Statement of Net Position As of September 30, 2015 and 2014 (in 000's) Governmental Activities Business -Type Activities Total 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 $ 599,051 475,489 $ 591,914 378,857 $ 1,678,692 464,230 $ 1,603,577 276,485 $ 2,277,743 939,719 $ 2,195,491 655,342 1,074,540 970,771 2,142,922 1,880,062 3,217,462 2,850,833 Deferred outflows of resources 26,967 5,469 16,743 12,253 43,710 17,722 Long-term liabilities 771,736 534,252 1,297,415 1,035,324 2,069,151 1,569,576 Estimated long-term liability clai 6,990 6,224 -- 6,990 6,224 Other liabilities 33,259 29,935 17,024 22,611 50,283 52,546 Total liabilities 811,985 570,411 1,314,439 1,057,935 2,126,424 1,628,346 Deferred inflows of resources 3,824 788 1,182 5,006 788 Net position Net invested in capital assets 268,380 271,712 768,460 793,058 1,036,840 1,064,770 Restricted 110,427 90,284 20,126 17,239 130,553 107,523 Unrestricted (93,109) 43,045 55,458 24,083 (37,651) 67,128 Total net position $ 285,698 $405,041 $ 844,044 $ 834,380 $ 1,129,742 $ 1,239,421 Of the business -type activities, the Utility System fund is the largest operation at the City with total assets of $1.90 billion, comprising 88.8% of all business -type activities total assets for 2015, slightly decreasing from 89.6% in 2014. The Utility System fund net position was $730.0 million which is 86.5% of total business -type activities net position at September 30, 2015, remaining relatively constant from September 30, 2014. Changes in Net Position Table 2 reflects a comparative detail of changes in net position for the City of Corpus Christi for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 and the 14 months ended September 30, 2014. The City implemented GASB No. 68 and GASB No. 71 at the beginning of 2015, and so the beginning net position at October 1, 2014 has been changed to reflect a prior period adjustment for the pension liability and related deferred outflows of $188.6 million. 9 City of Corpus Christi Revenue Program revenues Charges for services Operating grants and contributions Capital grants and contributions Total program revenues Table 2 Changes in Net Position For Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2015 (in 000's) Governmental Activities Business -Type Activities Total 2015 2014 * 2015 2014 * 2015 2014 * $ 73,555 $ 81,430 $ 272,854 $ 316,274 $ 346,409 $ 397,704 9,899 14,116 1,226 1,380 11,125 15,496 7,911 8,510 27,220 17,942 35,131 26,452 91,365 104,056 301,300 335,596 392,665 439,652 General revenue Property taxes 103,987 96,664 -- 103,987 96,664 Sales taxes 89,127 103,372 -- 89,127 103,372 Hotel occupancy taxes 15,110 17,067 -- -- 15,110 17,067 Investment earnings 1,278 1,244 1,217 345 2,495 1,589 Total general revenue 209,502 218,347 1,217 345 210,719 218,692 Total revenues 300,867 322,403 302,517 335,941 603,384 658,344 Expenses General government 20,095 23,529 -- -- 20,095 23,529 Police and municipal court 91,069 106,772 -- -- 91,069 106,772 Fire and ambulance 48,724 58,865 -- -- 48,724 58,865 Emergency management 614 632 -- -- 614 632 Inspections 2,379 2,183 -- -- 2,379 2,183 Streets 34,051 29,657 -- -- 34,051 29,657 Health 5,941 6,661 -- -- 5,941 6,661 Parks and recreation 19,929 22,829 -- -- 19,929 22,829 Libraries 4,576 4,780 -- -- 4,576 4,780 Museums 1,867 1,907 -- -- 1,867 1,907 Community enrichment 5,851 7,589 -- 5,851 7,589 Community development 13,365 14,025 -- 13,365 14,025 Convention and visitors activities 16,228 19,365 -- 16,228 19,365 Interest on long-term debt 16,378 15,358 -- -- 16,378 15,358 Solid waste -- -- 29,152 33,046 29,152 33,046 Utilities -- 198,386 224,658 198,386 224,658 Airport -- 13,631 15,413 13,631 15,413 Golf centers -- -- 215 198 215 198 Marina 1,997 2,185 1,997 2,185 Total expenses 281,067 314,152 243,381 275,500 524,448 589,652 Excess revenues over expenses 19,800 8,251 59,136 60,441 78,936 68,692 Transfers 14,953 19,380 (14,953) (19,380) Increase in net position 34,753 27,631 44,183 41,061 78,936 68,692 Net position at beginning of year 405,041 377,410 834,380 793,319 1,239,421 1,170,729 Prior period adjustment for change in accounting for pension liability (154,096) (34,519) (188,615) Net position at end of year $ 285,698 $ 405,041 $ 844,044 $ 834,380 $ 1,129,742 $1,239,421 * 14 -months year-to-date 10 City of Corpus Christi Governmental Activities As shown in Table 2, there was a $34.8 million increase in net position for governmental activities for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 as compared to a $23.7 million extrapolated net increase for the prior period. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, revenues totaled $300.9 million compared to $276.3 million as extrapolated for the prior period, an increase of $24.6 million or 8.9%. Property tax revenue reflected the highest extrapolated increase from the prior year of $21.1 million or 25.5% due to the increase in assessed property valuations. Expenses for governmental activities totaled $281.1 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 compared to $269.3 million as extrapolated for the prior period, an increase of approximately $11.8 million. This increase can be mainly attributed to increased street maintenance as a result of a priority established by the City Council, as well as 2.5% pay increase for general employees in 2015. Business -Type Activities As shown in Table 2, there was a $44.2 million increase in net position for business -type activities for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 as compared to a $35.2 million extrapolated net increase for the prior period, which is a 25.5% increase from the extrapolated change in net position for the prior period. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, revenues for business -type activities increased by $14.6 million from the prior period's extrapolated amounts. Revenues for the City's business -type activities are associated with operating activities accounted for in the enterprise funds, the largest activity being the utilities (75.9%) which consists of the gas, water, and wastewater systems. Charges for services for the utilities remained relatively constant from the extrapolated prior period, increasing by only $1.8 million. Although rate increases were implemented in October 2014: 7.79% residential water rate increase; 11.22% wastewater rate increase; and 5.0% gas rate increase, water usage dropped in 2015 due to water conservation efforts and a rainy year. Capital contributions mainly increased from the prior period due to grants received by the Airport for an extension of one of the runways ($13.6 million) and rehabilitation of three taxiways ($6.2 million). Expenses reported in the business -type activities increased by $7.2 million from the extrapolated prior period. The majority of expenses reported in the business -type activities were utilities (81.5%), reflecting $198.4 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 compared to $192.6 million for the extrapolated prior period. Expenses for the utilities increased by $5.8 million from the prior year. Bond issue costs increased $2.8 million due to the issuance of new utility junior lien debt and debt refunding. Contractual services increased $2.6 million due in part to legal services related to utility regulatory matters. Materials and supplies expense decreased by $4.9 million due in part to a $7.5 decrease in natural gas purchases resulting from a decrease in volume. Natural gas purchases, however, are a pass-through cost and are recaptured through revenue. 11 City of Corpus Christi FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE CITY'S GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Governmental Funds • Total assets of the General Fund remained relatively constant from the prior year, reporting $65.0 million at September 30, 2015 compared to $65.5 million at September 30, 2014. Cash, cash equivalents and investments reflect $50.6 million or 77.8% of total assets with net receivables reporting $13.2 million, or 20.2% of the total. The majority of the net receivables balance was in property taxes receivables, solid waste receivables, demolition liens, and intergovernmental receivables attributed to sales tax. Some of these receivables are deferred. • Total liabilities of the General Fund remained constant from the prior year at $13.5 million. • General Fund revenues for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 reflect a $14.9 million increase from the extrapolated prior period revenues. Sales tax revenue remained relatively flat. Total property taxes increased $13.9 million from $55.7 million for the extrapolated prior year balance to $69.6 million for fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. This increase is due in large part to an increase in assessed valuations in 2015. • The General Fund's unassigned fund balance decreased by $11.4 million from September 30, 2014. In 2015, encumbrances that were previously included in the unassigned fund balance have now been classified as assigned. This equates to $10.3 million for 2014 that had been included in the unassigned fund balance in the prior year; and $4.1 million for 2015 now classified as assigned. Additionally in 2014, the fund balance for Development Services of $4.2 million had been included as unassigned fund balance. In 2015, Development Services' fund balance of $5.0 million has been classified as assigned. These two changes account for the variance in the unassigned fund balance at September 30, 2015. • Committed for major contingencies in the General Fund increased by $1.8 million from $37.8 million at September 30, 2014 to $39.5 million at September 30, 2015. The financial policy specifies that the City maintain the commitment for major contingencies of least 10% and up to 25% of the total annual General Fund appropriations. The commitment at September 30, 2015 was 17.0% of the total General Fund appropriations for fiscal ended September 30, 2015. • The Debt Service Fund's committed fund balance increased by $2.1 million, reporting a balance of $10.8 million at September 30, 2015. This was due to the 14 -month year in 2014 where one an additional debt payment was made in 2014 for general obligation debt. • The Streets Capital Projects Fund increased its fund balance by $81.6 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. In 2015, the fund received $92.6 million in general improvement bonds to fund street projects approved by the voters in November 2014. The fund spent $11.2 million on capital projects during fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. Total fund balance was $160.2 million at September 30, 2015. 12 City of Corpus Christi Non -major Governmental Funds Funds comprising the non -major governmental category are special revenue, capital projects funds and debt service funds from the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation. The combined fund balance for all non -major governmental funds at September 30, 2015 was $171.2 million, as compared to $159.2 million at September 30, 2014. This represents an $12.0 million increase or 7.5%. The Street Maintenance Fund increased its fund balance by $6.8 million due to an increase in revenues being allocated for street maintenance and increased transfers. CAPITAL ASSET AND DEBT ADMINISTRATION Capital Assets As shown in Table 3, at September 30, 2015 the City had invested over $2.3 billion in a broad range of capital assets, including Police and Fire equipment, buildings, park facilities, roads and bridges, and its Utility System and Airport. This amount represented a net increase of $82.3 million, or 3.7% over September 30, 2014. The governmental activities increased by $7.1 million from the prior year. This increase included $32.3 million in additions less $25.1 million of depreciation expense and $135 thousand for retirements during fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. The business -type activities increased by $75.1 million during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. This increase included $123.2 million in additions less $46.7 million of depreciation expense and a $1.4 million in retirements. The majority of the increase was construction in progress associated with a wastewater plant, the Mary Rhodes Pipeline Phase II, extension of a runway at the Airport, replacement of a pier at the Marina, and other minor utility improvements. Table 3 Capital Assets (net of depreciation) at September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 (in 000's) Governmental Activities Business -Type Activities Total % Change 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2014-2015 Land $ 60,302 $ 60,247 $ 36,556 $ 36,556 $ 96,858 $ 96,803 0.1% Water rights 192,586 196,186 192,586 196,186 -1.8% Buildings 141,993 146,481 56,011 56,753 198,004 203,234 -2.6% Improvements 88,619 91,325 235,537 248,670 324,156 339,995 -4.7% Equipment 22,870 23,412 20,337 18,941 43,207 42,353 2.0% Infrastructure 189,323 181,619 774,669 782,035 963,992 963,654 0.0% Construction in progress 95,876 88,830 362,993 264,436 458,869 353,266 29.9% Total $ 598,983 $ 591,914 $ 1,678,689 $ 1,603,577 $ 2,277,672 $ 2,195,491 3.7% Long-term Liabilities Table 4 shows that total long-term liabilities increased $293.0 million during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, from $1.78 billion at September 30, 2014 to $2.07 billion at September 30, 2015, or 16.5%. Governmental activities reported a net increase in long-term liabilities of $69.3 million or 9.9% which reflects the addition of $103.9 million of debt, paying down $36.8 million of debt, and increasing other long-term liabilities by $2.2 million due mainly to an increase in net pension liability. Business -type activities reported an increase in long-term liabilities of $223.8 million or a 20.8% increase from September 30, 2014 due to the addition of $400.3 million of debt, paying down $179.8 million of debt, and increasing other long-term liabilities of $3.2 million due mainly to increased landfill closure costs and net pension liability. 13 City of Corpus Christi Table 4 Long -Term Liabilities at September 30, 2015 and 2014 (in 000's) Governmental Activities Business -Type Activities Total % Change 2015 2014 * 2015 2014 * 2015 2014 * 2014-2015 General obligation bonds $ 395,180 $ 323,830 $ 64,215 $ 66,185 $ 459,395 $ 390,015 17.8% Certificates of obligation 9,033 10,988 12,512 17,017 21,545 28,005 -23.1% Revenue bonds 65,105 71,725 -- -- 65,105 71,725 -9.2% Utility priority revenue bonds -- -- 336,420 416,345 336,420 416,345 -19.2% Utility junior lien revenue bonds -- -- 587,835 306,290 587,835 306,290 91.9% Discount on bonds payable (22) (32) (855) (888) (877) (920) -4.7% Premium on bonds payable 24,126 17,759 62,882 35,118 87,008 52,877 64.5% Capital leases 5,801 6,319 10,006 9,279 15,807 15,598 1.3% Other notes 22,878 24,405 141,286 144,436 164,164 168,841 -2.8% Total debt 522,101 454,994 1,214,301 993,782 1,736,402 1,448,776 19.9% Accumulated compensated absences 34,429 38,563 3,649 3,447 38,078 42,010 -9.4% Landfill closure cost 28,175 26,308 28,175 26,308 7.1% Net pension liability 204,265 197,653 50,451 49,372 254,716 247,025 3.1% Net OPEB obligation 10,942 11,244 839 740 11,781 11,984 -1.7% Total long-term liabilities $ 771,737 $ 702,454 $ 1,297,415 $ 1,073,649 $ 2,069,152 $ 1,776,103 16.5% * Restated to include prior period adjstment for net pension liability During the fiscal year, the City completed eight bond issuances to fund capital replacement of the docks at the Marina; to fund construction the Mary Rhodes Pipeline Phase 2 (both fixed rate debt and variable rate debt); to fund projects associated with the Texas Military Preparedness Commission; to fund utility projects planned and approved in the capital budget; to fund voter approved street projects; and to refund junior lien utility revenue bonds and Nueces River Authority water supply facilities revenue bonds for savings. In January 2015, the City issued $2.6 million of Marina System Revenue Bonds, Taxable Series 2015 for construction of new piers at the City's marina. The interest rate for these bonds is 3.0%. In March 2015, the City issued $93.6 million and $49.6 million of Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds, Series 2015A (fixed rate) and Series 2015B (variable rate) to finance the construction of "Mary Rhodes Pipeline Phase II" - the second phase of the City's water transport pipeline project. The interest rates range from 2.00% to 5.00%. In March 2015, the City issued $5.1 million of Tax Notes, Series 2015 to fund projects associated with the Texas Military Preparedness Commission. The transaction involved refunding $0.7 million of Series 2007 General Improvement Bonds and $4.4 million of 2007 Certificates of Obligations. The interest rates range from 3.95% to 4.28%. In July 2015, the City issued $101.4 million of Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds, Series 2015C to fund utility projects planned and approved in the 2015 capital budget. The interest rates range between 3.00% - 5.00%. 14 City of Corpus Christi In July 2015, the City issued $47.0 million of Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2015D to refund currently outstanding indebtedness for savings. The City will reduce its total debt service payments by approximately $3.8 million annually and obtain a net present value savings of approximately 8.4%. The interest rates range between 3.00% - 5.00%. In August 2015, the City issued $90.5 million of General Improvement Bonds, Series 2015 to fund street improvements (Proposition 1) and street safety, revitalization, and capacity improvement projects (Proposition 2) approved by the voters in November 2014. The interest rates range between 2.00% - 5.00%. In September 2015, the City issued $62.8 million of Nueces River Authority Water Supply Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds (City of Corpus Christi Lake Texana Project), Series 2015 to refund currently outstanding indebtedness for savings. The City will obtain a net present value savings of approximately 13.7%. The interest rates range between 3.00% - 5.00%. In Fiscal Year 2015 the City of Corpus Christi implemented GASB Statement No. 68 "Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions" and GASB Statement No. 71 "Pension Transition for Contributions Made Subsequent to the Measurement Date". As a result of implementation, the beginning liabilities related to pensions were adjusted at September 30, 2014. (See Note 1-P Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Recent Accounting Pronouncements in the Notes to the Financial Statements.) The net pension liability increased from $247.0 million at September 30, 2014 to $254.7 million at September 30, 2015, a 3.1% increase due to the City's funding its contribution to the Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) at a rate lower than the annual required contribution as actuarially determined. In calendar year 2011, the City Council approved an ordinance to change the "annually repeating" feature of the City's plan regarding updated service credits and 70% consumer price index (CPI) increases for annuitants to "ad hoc" (one time only basis) - thereby reducing the City's full contribution rate for subsequent years. However, these provisions are considered to be substantively automatic due to contract provisions with the Corpus Christi Police Officers' Association; so the full TMRS rate of 21.14% for 2015 is 5.05% more than the 16.09% contribution rate. See "Schedule of Contributions for TMRS" in the Required Supplemental Information. In 2015, the City funded 16.46%. It is the City Council and management's intent to increase the City's TMRS contribution rate by 2% each fiscal year beginning in 2017 until the fully funded rate is achieved. The financial/budgetary policies were amended by the City Council in March 2016 to reflect such a change. (See Note 9 Employee Retirement Benefits in the Notes to the Financial Statements.) The net OPEB (other post -employment benefits) obligation decreased by $0.2 million from September 30, 2014 to September 30, 2015. A roll -forward of the August 1, 2013 actuarial valuation determined that the total 12 -month required contribution (ARC) for the City at September 30, 2015, was $807 thousand. In an effort to reduce the City's liability, all City retirees who are Medicare -eligible are enrolled in a separate Medicare insurance plan and are not covered by the City's insurance. The unfunded actuarial accrued liability for the City at August 1, 2013, the most recent valuation date, is $11.8 million. (See Note 10 Post -Employment Health Care Benefits in the Notes to the Financial Statements.) 15 City of Corpus Christi Additionally, the landfill closure cost increased by $1.9 million from September 30, 2014 to September 30, 2015 due mainly to changes in the estimates for the closure/post-closure costs for the Cefe Valenzuela landfill. (See Note 13 Long -Term Obligations in the Notes to the Financial Statements.) Bond Ratings In 2015, the City received two bond rating upgrades. Standard & Poor's Ratings Service (S&P) upgraded the City's junior lien utility revenue bonds to A+ and the City's primary lien utility revenue bonds to AA- in 2015. The utility bond ratings from the other two rating agencies were reaffirmed in 2015. The unenhanced bond ratings for general obligation bonds were assigned Aa2 from Moody's Investors Service, Inc. (Moody's), AA- from Standard & Poor's Ratings Service (S&P), and AA from Fitch Ratings (Fitch). The City's unenhanced bond ratings for 2015 for the primary lien utility revenue bonds were assigned Aa3 from Moody's, AA- from S&P, and AA- from Fitch. The City's unenhanced bond ratings for the junior lien utility revenue bonds established in 2013 were A+ by S&P, A+ by Fitch, and by Al by Moody's. The unenhanced bond ratings for the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development's sales tax revenue bonds for the arena and seawall were Al from Moody's, A+ from S&P, and AA- from Fitch. The unenhanced bond ratings for the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development's sales tax revenue bonds for the baseball stadium were Al from Moody's, A+ from S&P, and AA from Fitch. GENERAL FUND BUDGETARY HIGHLIGHTS The financial policies of the City dictate that current budgeted revenues will equal or exceed current budgeted expenditures. The financial policy is to maintain the commitment for major contingencies of least 10% and up to 25% of the total annual General Fund appropriations. The commitment at September 30, 2015 was 17.0% of the total annual General Fund appropriations in 2015. Exhibit 3 of the Financial Statements reflects the budget to actual budget basis comparisons for the General Fund. The originally adopted General Fund revenue budget (including transfers in) of $228.9 million was amended by the City Council during 2015 resulting in a net decrease in revenue of $1.1 million. This amendment eliminated the Medicaid 1115 Waiver Para Medicine project; thus reducing the revenue budgeted for this project of $1.3 million. The originally adopted General Fund expenditure budget (including transfers out) of $228.9 million was amended by the City Council during 2015 resulting in a net increase in expenditures of $6.1 million. Major amendments included $2.4 million of encumbrances carried forward into 2015; $1.1 million transfer to Municipal Information Systems Fund to support implementation of the Infor Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system; $1.0 million transfer to Street Maintenance Fund for the residential and local street program; $1.1 transfer to Debt Service Fund for debt service on Certificates of Obligation to be issued for Solid Waste and Landfill facilities; $1.3 million decrease due to the elimination of the Medicaid 1115 Waiver Para Medicine project noted above; $507 thousand for the purchase of six sedans and one light and air truck; $293 thousand for early completion of the Downtown Area Development Plan; and $267 thousand for repair to Police Department roof. (See Note 6 Budgetary Data in the Notes to the Financial Statements for more detail of the budget changes.) 16 City of Corpus Christi Budgetary Variances General Fund actual budget basis revenue for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 of $221.8 million was $3.3 million less than the amended budget amount. This was due mainly to a decrease of $4.3 million in sales tax revenue resulting from the slowdown of the Eagle Ford Shale oil and gas formation. General Fund actual budget basis expenditures for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 of $205.3 million were $9.8 million less than the amended budget amount of $215.1 million. Main contributing factors were savings from $2.1 million of reserve appropriations budgeted in the General Governmental function not being spent. Fire and ambulance was under budget by $1.2 million due to the timing of vehicle and equipment purchase. Several General Fund departments were under budget for a variety of reasons. Public Information was under budget by $332 thousand due to the timing of a website redesign contract that was budgeted in 2015 but not acquired until 2016. The Municipal Court was $575 thousand under budget due efficiencies realized during the implementation of their new software system (Incode). New refuse collection equipment that was budgeted and ordered in 2015 was not received until 2016 due to manufacturing delays - resulting in $429 thousand of lease purchase payments that were budgeted but not being spent in 2015. Lower energy costs for diesel fuel and electricity, coupled with higher utilization of CNG vehicles, resulted in $247 thousand of savings for the General Fund. The termination of an infrastructure maintenance contract with Star Operations that was budgeted but not incurred in 2015 resulted in a $300 thousand savings. Additionally, parks and recreation had salary savings of $504 thousand. ECONOMIC FACTORS AND NEXT YEAR'S BUDGET AND RATES • The unemployment rate for Corpus Christi increased slightly to 5.0% in September 2015 from 4.9% in September 2014. In December 2015, the unemployment rate increased to 5.2%, which was above the 4.7% unemployment rate for the State of Texas and above the 5.0% national unemployment rate. • For fiscal year 2015-2016, the Certified Net Assessed Taxable Value experienced an increase of 7.6% from $17.0 billion to $18.3 billion. The adopted tax rate for fiscal year 2015-2016 is $0.606264 per $100 valuation. The Maintenance and Operations (M&O) rate is $0.376806 per $100 valuation, and the Debt Service rate is $0.229458 per $100 valuation which includes a $0.021 voter -approved tax rate increase. • The City of Corpus Christi has appropriated total revenues and expenditures for fiscal year 2015-2016 of $865.5 million and $841.7 million, respectively. Included for the General Fund are revenues budgeted at $232.1, which is a $3.2 million increase over the adopted General Fund budget of $228.9 million for fiscal year 2014-2015 (excluding transfers out). Ad valorem tax revenue is budgeted at an 8.3% increase from the prior year which is estimated to generate an additional $5.1 million. Sales tax revenue is budgeted at a 1% increase over the current year's estimate. • Included for the General Fund are expenditures budgeted at $232.5 million, which is a $3.5 million increase over the adopted General Fund budget of $228.9 for fiscal year 2014-2015 (including transfers out). The budget includes the new collectively bargained agreement with 17 City of Corpus Christi the Police Officers' Association which calls for the City match to increase from 6% to 7% in FY 2018-2019. It also includes a 2% increase for the City's TMRS retirement contribution from 16.46% to 18.46%. • Two-year utility rate increases are programmed in the fiscal year 2015-2016 budget as follows: 22.0% average water rate increase for residential customers; 11.1% wastewater rate increase; and 1.9% gas rate increase. This will be the first year that two-year rates have been adopted by the City Council. These rates will be effective beginning January 1, 2016 - rather than at the beginning of the fiscal year as has been previously implemented. CITY'S FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT This financial report is designed to provide the City Council, citizens, taxpayers, customers, bondholders, creditors, and other governmental sectors with a general overview of the City's financial condition and to demonstrate the City's accountability for the funds it receives. If you have any questions about this report or need additional information, contact: The City of Corpus Christi Director of Financial Services P. O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 (361) 826-3613 (361) 826-3601 (fax) or visit our web site at: www.cctexas.com 18 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 City of Corpus Christi ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments (Note 5) Receivables, net of allowance for uncollectibles (Note 7) Internal balances Inventories Prepaid items Restricted assets Cash, cash equivalents and investements (Note 5) Receivables, net of allowance for uncollectibles (Note 7) Other property Land and construction in progress (Note 8) Other capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization (Note 8) Total assets DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unamortized loss on refunded debt Deferred outflows related to pension liability (Note 9) Total deferred outflows of resources LIABILITIES Accounts payable Accrued expenses Accrued interest Contractor interest and retainage payable Deposits Liability to claimants - escheat property Due to other govemmental agencies Uneamed revenue Current portion of estimated claims liability (Note 11) Current portion of long-term liabilities (Note 13) Long-term debt Landfill closure cost Accumulated unpaid compensated absences (Continued) STATEMENT OF NET POSITION SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Primary Government Governmental Activities $ 176,550,430 13,915,577 (258,331) 1,930,136 2,357,022 262,316,204 18,627,849 49,871 156,244,699 442,806,785 1,074,540,242 4,411,738 22,554,842 26,966,580 7,576,742 7,474,614 3,803,541 1,180,505 1,234,083 106,230 790,987 3,339,860 7,752,096 32,529,720 7,372,689 20 Business -Type Activities $ 116,323,444 32,957,935 258,331 717,455 197,756 313,652,106 122,652 399,549,775 1,279,142,243 2,142,921,697 10,761,166 5,982,273 16,743,439 2,281,788 1,092,490 9,114,030 1,709,435 2,356,535 124,308 345,286 47,949,884 756,722 1,894,541 Total $ 292,873,874 46,873,512 2,647,591 2,554,778 575,968,310 18,750,501 49,871 555,794,474 1,721,949,028 3,217,461,939 15,172,904 28,537,115 43,710,019 9,858,530 8,567,104 12,917,571 2,889,940 3,590,618 230,538 790,987 3,685,146 7,752,096 80,479,604 756,722 9,267,230 Component Units $ 1,064,309 9,740 173,119 280,423 1,527,591 314,420 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 1-A Primary Government Governmental Business -Type Component Activities Activities Total Units Estimated liability claims, excluding current portion (Note 11) 6,990,306 -- 6,990,306 Long-term liabilities, excluding current portion (Note 13) Long-term debt 489,571,275 1,166,350,978 1,655,922,253 Landfill closure cost 27,418,022 27,418,022 Accumulated unpaid compensated absences 27,056,423 1,754,952 28,811,375 Net pension liability (Note 9) 204,264,431 50,451,195 254,715,626 Net OPEB obligation (Note 10) 10,942,020 838,722 11,780,742 Total liabilities 811,985,522 1,314,438,888 2,126,424,410 314,420 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unamortized gain on refunded debt 788,193 -- 788,193 Deferred inflows related to pension liability (Note 9) 3,035,432 1,182,499 4,217,931 Total deferred inflows of resources 3,823,625 1,182,499 5,006,124 NET POSITION Net invested in capital assets 268,379,713 768,459,800 1,036,839,513 280,423 Restricted for Vital statistics records retention 307,831 -- 307,831 Bond interest and redemption 1,344,500 2,457,383 3,801,883 Municipal and Juvenile Court 646,348 -- 646,348 Fire contribution trust 5,585 5,585 PEG equipment and facilities 1,786,069 1,786,069 Tourism (HOT) 6,105,090 6,105,090 Traffic safety programs 752,809 752,809 State and federal grant programs 988,412 988,412 Parks and recreation 2,629,415 2,629,415 Infrastructure development 1,696,446 1,696,446 Loans 14,086,807 14,086,807 Crime control and prevention 5,441,581 -- 5,441,581 Business and job development 66,381,385 -- 66,381,385 Tax increment zone improvements 8,254,453 -- 8,254,453 -- Public health -- 5,637,282 5,637,282 3,719 Law enforcement officers' standards and education 3,974 3,974 -- Construction of capital assets 11,931,593 11,931,593 Other -- 95,765 95,765 -- Unrestricted (93,108,769) 55,457,952 (37,650,817) 929,029 Total net position $ 285,697,675 $ 844,043,749 $ 1,129,741,424 $ 1,213,171 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 21 City of Corpus Christi STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Expenses Charges for Services Primary govemment Governmental activities General government $ 20,095,432 $ 25,920,218 Police and municipal court 91,069,002 13,916,904 Fire and ambulance 48,724,237 6,272,542 Emergency management 613,555 -- Inspections 2,379,102 -- Streets 34,051,106 12,894,106 Health 5,940,977 2,297,734 Parks and recreation 19,928,692 3,246,304 Libraries 4,575,572 163,688 Museums 1,866,875 647,555 Community enrichment 5,851,215 9,829 Community development 13,365,023 3,768,579 Convention and visitor activities 16,228,430 4,417,120 Interest on long-term debt 16,378,266 -- Total govemmental activities 281,067,484 73,554,579 Business -type activities Solid Waste 29,152,032 37,475,401 Utilities Water 107,235,791 121,958,577 Gas 34,256,774 32,265,916 Wastewater 56,892,815 68,488,526 Airport 13,631,297 10,549,237 Golf centers 214,575 204,936 Marina 1,997,197 1,911,146 Total business -type activities 243,380,481 272,853,739 Total primary government $ 524,447,965 $ 346,408,318 Component units Convention and visitor activities 22 $ 5,113,108 $ 502,660 City of Corpus Christi Program Revenue Net (expense) revenue and changes in net position Exhibit 1-B Operating Capital Grants and Grants and Governmental Business -type Contributions Contributions Activities Activities 1,991,283 748,564 225,248 2,065,969 2,532,070 80,561 1,082,854 1,172,603 Total 84,364 $ 5,909,151 $ $ 5,909,151 306,244 (74,854,571) (74,854,571) -- (41,703,131) (41,703,131) (388,307) (388,307) -- (2,379,102) (2,379,102) 4,315,748 (16,841,252) (16,841,252) -- (1,577,274) (1,577,274) 1,288,269 (12,862,049) (12,862,049) 20 (4,331,303) (4,331,303) (1,219,320) (1,219,320) 709,000 (4,049,532) (4,049,532) 879,905 (7,543,936) (7,543,936) -- (11,811,310) (11,811,310) 328,276 (16,049,990) (16,049,990) 9,899,152 7,911,826 (189,701,926) (189,701,926) 8,323,369 8,323,369 643,387 2,890,958 18,257,131 18,257,131 56,266 38,126 (1,896,466) (1,896,466) 507,583 2,905,362 15,008,656 15,008,656 19,099 20,779,968 17,717,007 17,717,007 -- -- (9,639) (9,639) 605,246 519,195 519,195 1,226,335 27,219,660 11,125,487 $ 35,131,486 (189,701,926) 57,919,253 57,919,253 57,919,253 (131,782,673) Component Units $ (4,610,448) General revenue Taxes Property taxes, levied for general purposes 69,730,902 69,730,902 Property taxes, levied for debt service 34,255,712 34,255,712 Sales taxes 89,126,468 89,126,468 Hotel occupancy taxes 15,110,411 -- 15,110,411 -- Unrestricted investment eamings 1,277,826 1,217,295 2,495,121 629 Payments from primary government -- -- 4,959,744 Transfers 14,953,233 (14,953,233) -- Total general revenue and transfers 224,454,552 (13,735,938) 210,718,614 4,960,373 Changes in net position 34,752,626 44,183,315 78,935,941 349,925 Net position at beginning of year 405,040,842 834,379,921 1,239,420,763 863,246 Prior period adjustment for change in accounting for pension liability (Note 1-P) (154,095,793) (34,519,487) (188,615,280) Adjusted net position at beginning of year 250,945,049 799,860,434 Net position at end of year 1,050,805,483 863,246 $ 285,697,675 $ 844,043,749 $ 1,129,741,424 $ 1,213,171 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement 23 City of Corpus Christi GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 General Street Other Debt Capital Governmental Service Projects Funds ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments (Note 5) $ 50,587,618 $ 10,776,370 $ 160,723,710 $ 157,091,933 Receivables, net of allowance for uncollectibles (Note 7) 13,157,478 875,885 85,569 22,364,163 Inventories -- -- -- 362,863 Prepaid items 1,873 -- -- 286,607 Advances to other funds (Note 15) 1,270,688 -- -- -- Total assets $ 65,017,657 $ 11,652,255 $ 160,809,279 $ 180,105,566 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Liabilities Accounts payable $ 3,247,255 $ 1,611 $ 28,777 $ 2,045,543 Accrued liabilities 7,034,566 -- -- 669,534 Contractor interest and retainage payable -- -- 186,051 1,015,882 Deposits 502,787 -- 353,400 577,103 Liability to claimants - escheat property 86,886 -- -- -- Due to other funds (Note 15) -- -- -- 1,029,019 Due to other governmental agencies 362,016 -- -- 428,971 Advance from other funds (Note 15) -- -- -- 500,000 Unearned revenues 2,262,646 873,110 2,651,756 Total liabilities 13,496,156 874,721 568,228 8,917,808 Fund balances Nonspendable Inventory Prepaid items Advances to other funds Total nonspendable Restricted Vital statistic record retention Municipal and Juvenile Court Municipal Court building security Municipal Court technology Judicial/Court improvements Juvenile Court case manager Fire contribution trust PEG equipment and facilities Tourism (HOT) Traffic safety programs (Continued) 362,863 1,873 -- -- 230,961 1,270,688 -- -- -- 1,272,561 -- -- 593,824 307,831 106,316 119,707 55,993 364,332 5,585 19,768 -- -- 1,766,301 6,105,090 752,809 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 2-A Total Governmental Funds $ 379,179,631 36,483,095 362,863 288,480 1,270,688 $ 417,584,757 $ 5,323,186 7,704,100 1,201,933 1,433,290 86,886 1,029,019 790,987 500,000 5,787,512 23,856,913 362,863 232,834 1,270,688 1,866,385 307,831 106,316 119,707 55,993 364,332 5,585 1,786,069 6,105,090 752,809 25 City of Corpus Christi GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 General Streets Other Debt Capital Governmental Service Projects Funds Federal and state grant programs Law enforcement -- -- -- 306,744 Fire and ambulance -- -- 4,764 CDBG projects -- -- -- 243,762 Libraries -- -- -- 28 Community enrichment -- -- -- 7,010 Parks and recreation -- -- -- 2,629,415 Infrastructure -- -- -- 1,696,446 Loans -- -- -- 14,086,807 Crime control and prevention -- -- -- 5,441,581 Business and job development Seawall improvement -- -- -- 37,249,581 Arena facility -- -- -- 20,581,973 Economic development -- -- -- 8,549,831 Tax increment zone improvements North Padre Island development -- -- -- 6,000,884 Downtown development -- -- -- 2,253,569 Debt service -- -- -- 1,344,500 Capital projects -- 156,013,014 37,679,256 Total restricted 389,177 -- 156,013,014 147,290,706 Committed Major contingencies 39,525,111 -- -- -- Government access equipment 11,959 -- -- -- Radio system capital replacement 27,925 -- -- -- Debt service -- 10,777,534 -- -- Parking improvements -- -- -- 241,787 Streets -- -- -- 18,669,797 Sister City programs -- -- -- 1,165 Park projects -- -- -- 3,265 Permanent art projects -- -- -- 260,427 Development projects -- -- -- 1,106,310 Local Emergency Planning Committee -- -- -- 60,714 Capital projects 2,647,222 656,146 Total committed 39,564,995 10,777,534 2,647,222 20,999,611 Assigned Health 1115 Waiver 962,018 -- -- -- Visitors facilities -- -- -- 2,291,813 Development Services 5,014,281 -- -- -- Housing -- -- -- 87,000 Industrial development -- -- -- 68,775 Subsequent year's expenditures 4,139,593 -- -- -- Arts and Cultural Commission 4,252 -- -- -- Capital projects -- -- 1,580,815 62,867 Total assigned 10,120,144 -- 1,580,815 2,510,455 Unassigned 174,624 -- (206,838) Total fund balances 51,521,501 10,777,534 160,241,051 171,187,758 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 65,017,657 $ 11,652,255 $ 160,809,279 $ 180,105,566 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 2-A (Continued) Total Governmental Funds 306,744 4,764 243,762 28 7,010 2,629,415 1,696,446 14,086,807 5,441,581 37,249,581 20,581,973 8,549,831 6,000,884 2,253,569 1,344,500 193,692,270 303,692,897 39,525,111 11,959 27,925 10,777,534 241,787 18,669,797 1,165 3,265 260,427 1,106,310 60,714 3,303,368 73,989,362 962,018 2,291,813 5,014,281 87,000 68,775 4,139,593 4,252 1,643,682 14,211,414 (32,214) 393,727,844 $ 417,584,757 27 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 2-B RECONCILIATION OF THE GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS BALANCE SHEET TO THE STATEMENT OF NET POSITION SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Total fund balance - total governmental funds $ 393,727,844 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net position are different because: Capital assets used in governmental activities are not current financial resources and therefore are not reported in the governmental funds. The cost of assets in governmental activities excluding Internal service funds is $975,443,943 and the accumulated depreciation is $390,698,595. The costs of assets in Solid Waste is $115,790,303 and the accumulated depreciation is $46,987,735 which are included in business -type activities. Some other long-term assets are not available to pay for current period expenditures and are, therefore, deferred in the funds. A detail of these assets follows. Governmental activities Deferred taxes $ 2,451,333 Deferred assessments and liens 3,570 Internal service funds are used by management to charge the cost of certain activities, such as inventory of commonly used material and supplies, vehicular fleet and building maintenance, data processing, insurance and engineering. The assets and liabilities of the internal service funds are included in governmental activities in the government -wide statement of net position. Deferred inflows and outflows are not reported in the funds. Governmental activities Unamortized loss on refunded debt $ 4,411,738 Deferred outflows related to pension liability 20,380,428 Deferred inflows related to pension liability (2,603,672) Unamortized gain on refunded debt (788,193) Solid Waste Unamortized loss on refunded debt 4,015,206 Deferred outflows related to pension liability 1,082,198 Deferred inflows related to pension liability (212,568) Some liabilities are not due and payable in the current period and therefore are not reported in funds. A detail of these liabilities follows. Governmental activities Accrued interest $ (3,344,883) Long-term debt (519,905,745) Accumulated compensated absences (32,834,449) Net pension liability (186,143,020) Solid Waste Accrued interest (137,756) Long-term debt (55,495,802) Accumulated compensated absences (969,819) Net pension liability (8,301,156) Landfill closure costs (28,174,744) Solid Waste is a business -type activity that is included in the general fund. Assets and liabilities relating to Solid Waste are included in business -type activities in the government -wide statement of net position. 653,547,916 2,454,903 30,236,091 26,285,137 (835,307,374) 14,753,158 Net position of governmental activities $ 285,697,675 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. City of Corpus Christi GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 General Street Debt Capital Service Proiects Revenues Taxes and business fees $ 146,963,707 $ 34,181,412 $ Licenses and permits 7,612,701 -- Intergovernmental Grants 302,975 Charges for services 57,843,619 Fines and forfeitures 4,113,054 -- Contributions and donations -- 709,320 Special assessments -- -- 67,952 Earnings on investments 491,505 47,112 284,697 Interest on loans -- -- -- Payments from Texas State Aquarium 328,276 Sale of City property -- -- -- Miscellaneous 1,633,719 49,242 Total revenues 218,961,280 34,556,800 1,111,211 Expenditures Current General government 20,047,754 215,235 Police and municipal court 78,305,545 -- Fire and ambulance 49,530,979 Emergency management 410,149 Inspections 2,192,750 Streets 3,434,796 Solid waste 23,153,110 Health 3,496,163 Parks and recreation 14,047,373 Libraries 4,011,974 Museums 1,567,889 Community enrichment -- Community development Convention and visitors activities -- Capital projects 11,190,163 Debt service Principal retirement 4,401,551 24,705,189 Interest 268,836 14,881,805 -- Bond issue cost -- 12,729 716,865 Paying agent fees 39,317 -- Total expenditures 204,868,869 39,639,040 12,122,263 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures 14,092,411 (5,082,240) (11,011,052) (Continued) City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 2-C Other Total Governmental Governmental Funds Funds $ 48,468,671 $ 229,613,790 40,586 7,653,287 2,427,736 2,427,736 12,740,119 13,043,094 17,307,002 75,150,621 2,217,681 6,330,735 1,124,031 1,833,351 -- 67,952 465,344 1,288,658 59,282 59,282 -- 328,276 46,779 46,779 974,364 2,657,325 85,871,595 340,500,886 637,915 20,900,904 10,453,798 88,759,343 743,812 50,274,791 188,360 598,509 2,192,750 23,926,895 27,361,691 23,153,110 2,073,768 5,569,931 3,095,843 17,143,216 50,706 4,062,680 -- 1,567,889 2,407,841 2,407,841 11,115,966 11,115,966 14,625,022 14,625,022 16,067,564 27,257,727 7,218,332 36,325,072 3,134,036 18,284,677 59,601 789,195 7,694 47,011 95,807,153 352,437,325 (9,935,558) (11,936,439) 31 City of Corpus Christi GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 General Street Debt Capital Service Proiects Other financing sources (uses) Capital leases 4,137,196 -- General obligation bonds issued -- 83,571,766 Premium on bonds issued -- 9,002,953 Refunding bonds issued 2,137,681 -- Payment to escrow agent for refunded bonds -- (2,137,681) -- Transfers in (Note 15) 5,949,795 7,199,384 3,295 Transfers out (Note 15) (24,642,125) -- -- Total other financing sources (uses) (14,555,134) 7,199,384 92,578,014 Net change in fund balance (462,723) 2,117,144 81,566,962 Fund balances at beginning of year 51,984,224 8,660,390 78,674,089 Fund balances at end of year $ 51,521,501 $ 10,777,534 $ 160,241,051 The notes to the fmancial statements are an integral part of this statement. City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 2-C (Continued) Other Total Governmental Governmental Funds Funds 671,670 4,808,866 6,948,234 90,520,000 748,513 9,751,466 -- 2,137,681 -- (2,137,681) 16,441,172 29,593,646 (2,912,833) (27,554,958) 21,896,756 107,119,020 11,961,198 95,182,581 159,226,560 298,545,263 $ 171,187,758 $ 393,727,844 33 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 2-D RECONCILIATION OF THE GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Net change in fund balances - total governmental funds $ 95,182,581 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of activities are different because: Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities the cost of capital assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense. This is the amount by which capital outlays exceed depreciation in the current period. Governmental activities Capital outlays $ 27,598,433 Retirement of capital assets (11,791) Depreciation (20,925,508) Solid Waste Capital outlays 4,751,590 Depreciation (4,739,699) Delinquent property taxes and special assessments, net of allowance, are not reported as revenue in the governmental funds. These items increased in the current fiscal year. Bond proceeds provide current financial resources to governmental funds, but issuing debt increases long-term liabilities in the statement of net position. Repayment of bond principal is an expenditure in the governmental funds, but the repayment reduces long-term liabilities in the statement of net position. This is the amount by which proceeds exceeded repayment. Governmental activities Bond proceeds $ (100,271,466) Refunding bonds issued (2,137,681) Payment to escrow agent for refunded bonds 2,137,681 Capital leases (1,253,969) Principal retirement 30,745,814 Interest 457,031 Solid Waste Capital leases (3,554,897) Principal retirement 5,579,258 Interest (548,893) 6,673,025 187,939 (68,847,122) Compensated absences reported in the statement of net position did not require the use of current financial resources, and therefore are not expenditures in governmental funds. Compensated absences for governmental funds increased by $4,292,610 and solid waste activities decreased by $81,178. 4,211,435 Landfill closure costs reported in the statement of net position did not require the use of current fmancial resources, and therefore are not expenditures in governmental funds. Landfill closure costs increased in the current year. (1,866,936) Net pension liability and related deferred outflows and inflows reported in the statement of net position did not require the use of current fmancial resources, and therefore are not an expenditure in the governmental funds. Net pension liability and related deferred outflows and inflows for governmental funds decreased by $1,181,513 and solid waste activities increased by $50,759. (1,130,754) Solid Waste is a business -type activity that is included in governmental funds. Net income relating to Solid Waste are included in business -type activities in the government -wide statement of activities. Operating income $ (8,323,369) Net transfers 10,909,823 Investment earnings (5,242) Internal service funds are used by management to charge the cost of certain activities, such as inventory of commonly used material and supplies, vehicular fleet and building maintenance, data processing, insurance and engineering to individual funds. The net revenue (expense) of certain internal service funds is reported with governmental activities. 2,581,212 (2,238,754) Change in net position of governmental activities $ 34,752,626 The notes to the fmancial statements are an integral part of this statement. City of Corpus Christi GENERAL FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET (GAAP BASIS) AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Budget Actual Adjustments GAAP Budget Original Final Basis Basis Revenues Taxes and business fees $ 151,293,596 $ 151,293,596 $ 146,963,707 $ Licenses and permits 1,741,350 1,741,350 7,612,701 (5,410,699) Grants 382,400 382,400 302,975 Charges for services 58,226,694 57,106,634 57,843,619 (215,751) Fines and forfeitures 4,702,884 4,702,884 4,113,054 Earnings on investments 905,000 905,000 491,505 (13,510) Miscellaneous 955,741 981,238 1,633,719 (13,681) Reimbursements 4,686,733 4,686,733 -- 5,239,625 Total revenues 222,894,398 221,799,835 218,961,280 (414,016) Expenditures Current General government 23,561,800 22,988,338 20,047,754 (1,574,209) Police and municipal court 78,539,469 80,641,188 78,305,545 1,690,500 Fire and ambulance 49,747,494 51,050,734 49,530,979 684,954 Emergency management 469,188 467,688 410,149 -- Inspections -- — 2,192,750 (2,192,750) Streets 3,685,906 4,103,640 3,434,796 745 Solid waste 27,681,251 29,086,815 23,153,110 4,876,958 Health 5,332,485 3,926,420 3,496,163 -- Parks and recreation 16,974,721 17,281,719 14,047,373 1,583,156 Libraries 4,024,249 4,060,944 4,011,974 -- Museums 1,502,227 1,520,724 1,567,889 -- Debt service Principal retirement — 4,401,551 (4,401,551) Interest 268,836 (268,836) Total expenditures 211,518,790 215,128,210 204,868,869 398,967 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures 11,375,608 6,671,625 14,092,411 (812,983) Other financing sources (uses) Capital leases — -- 4,137,196 (4,137,196) Transfers in (Note 15) 6,017,261 6,017,261 5,949,796 247,552 Transfers out (Note 15) (17,392,870) (19,929,398) (24,642,125) 4,755,519 Total otherfmancing sources (uses) (11,375,609) (13,912,137) (14,555,133) 865,875 Net change in fund balance (1) (7,240,512) (462,722) 52,892 Fund balance at beginning of year 36,568,481 51,984,224 51,984,224 (5,401,990) Fund balance at end of year $ 36,568,480 $ 44,743,712 $ 51,521,502 $ (5,349,098) The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 36 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 3 Variance Actual Final Budget Budget Positive Basis (Negative) $ 146,963,707 $ (4,329,889) 2,202,002 460,652 302,975 (79,425) 57,627,868 521,234 4,113,054 (589,830) 477,995 (427,005) 1,620,038 638,800 5,239,625 552,892 218,547,264 (3,252,571) 18,473,545 4,514,793 79,996,045 645,143 50,215,933 834,801 410,149 57,539 3,435,541 668,099 28,030,068 1,056,747 3,496,163 430,257 15,630,529 1,651,190 4,011,974 48,970 1,567,889 (47,165) 205,267,836 9,860,374 13,279,428 6,607,803 6,197,348 180,087 (19,886,606) 42,792 (13,689,258) 222,879 (409,830) 6,830,682 46,582,234 $ 46,172,404 $ 6,830,682 37 City of Corpus Christi PROPRIETARY FUNDS STATEMENT OF NET POSITION SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Enterprise Funds Utility Other System Airport Enterprise Fund Fund Funds ASSETS Current assets Cash, cash equivalents and investments (Note 5) $ 109,399,552 $ 5,627,279 $ 384,453 Receivables, net of allowance for uncollectibles (Note 7) 26,415,991 1,567,659 639,188 Due from other funds (Note 15) -- 1,029,019 -- Inventories 687,818 29,637 Prepaid items 197,756 -- Restricted assets Cash, cash equivalents and investments (Note 5) 308,841,246 4,789,432 Receivables, net of allowance for uncollectibles (Note 7) -- 122,652 Total restricted assets 308,841,246 4,912,084 Total current assets 445,542,363 Noncurrent assets Other assets Capital assets (Note 8) Land and construction in progress Other capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization Net capital assets Total noncurrent assets 13,165,678 1,023,641 325,980,962 59,923,175 1,131,032,432 83,179,335 3,435,550 6,337,996 1,457,013,394 143,102,510 9,773,546 1,457,013,394 143,102,510 9,773,546 Total assets 1,902,555,757 156,268,188 10,797,187 DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unamortized loss on refunded debt Deferred outflows related to pension liability (Note 9) Total deferred outflows of resources (Continued) 6,216,987 4,228,812 10,445,799 495,962 33,011 583,048 88,215 1,079,010 121,226 City of Corpus Christi Total Exhibit 4-A Internal Service Funds $ 115,411,284 $ 60,620,591 28,622,838 395,428 1,029,019 -- 717,455 1,567,273 197,756 2,068,542 313,630,678 122,652 313,753,330 459,731,682 64,651,834 49,871 389,339,687 133,039 1,220,549,763 14,173,097 1,609,889,450 14,306,136 1,609, 8 89,450 14,3 56, 007 2,069,621,132 79,007,841 6,745,960 -- 4,900,075 2,174,414 11,646,035 2,174,414 39 City of Corpus Christi PROPRIETARY FUNDS STATEMENT OF NET POSITION SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Enterprise Funds Utility Other System Airport Enterprise Fund Fund Funds LIABILITIES Current liabilities Accounts payable $ 2,205,358 $ 65,688 $ 10,742 Accrued expenses 748,068 101,183 13,753 Accrued interest 8,877,546 83,507 15,221 Current portion of estimated liability claims (Note 11) -- -- Contractor interest and retainage payable 1,520,702 6,902 160,403 Deposits 2,001,992 17,090 133,598 Liability to claimants - escheat property 124,308 -- -- Advances from other funds -- -- 770,688 Unearned revenue 16,204 298,641 27,391 Current portion of long-term liabilities (Note 13) Long-term debt 41,952,239 1,215,000 215,000 Accumulated unpaid compensated absences 1,008,150 82,482 22,490 Total current liabilities 58,454,567 1,870,493 1,369,286 Noncurrent liabilities Estimated liability claims, net of current portion (Note 11) Long-term liabilities, net of current portion (Note 13) Long-term debt 1,084,916,000 25,442,464 5,064,357 Accumulated unpaid compensated absences 1,337,504 190,406 38,642 Net pension liability (Note 9) 36,889,111 4,556,768 704,160 Net OPEB obligation (Note 10) 570,199 81,960 14,412 Total noncurrent liabilities 1,123,712,814 30,271,598 5,821,571 Total liabilities 1,182,167,381 32,142,091 7,190,857 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred inflows related to pension liability (Note 9) 837,019 115,147 17,765 NET POSITION Net invested in capital assets 625,906,556 118,850,742 Restricted for Passenger facility charges projects -- 2,457,383 Bond interest and redemption 11,931,593 -- Improvements to utility lines and facilities 5,637,282 Abatement of public health hazards 95,765 -- Law enforcement officers' standards and education -- 3,974 Unrestricted 86,425,960 3,777,861 Total net position 4,527,200 (817,409) $ 729,997,156 $ 125,089,960 $ 3,709,791 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. City of Corpus Christi Total Exhibit 4-A (continued) Internal Service Funds $ 2,281,788 $ 2,253,556 863,004 458,658 8,976,274 -- -- 7,752,096 1,688,007 -- 2,152,680 4,648 124,308 19,344 770,688 -- 342,236 10,302 43,382,239 523,253 1,113,122 536,562 61,694,346 11,558,419 6,990,306 1,115,422,821 1,671,997 1,566,552 1,058,101 42,150,039 18,121,411 666,571 11,114,171 1,159,805,983 38,955,986 1,221,500,329 50,514,405 969,931 431,759 749,284,498 12,110,886 2,457,383 11,931,593 5,637,282 95,765 3,974 -- 89,386,412 18,125,205 $ 858,796,907 $ 30,236,091 41 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 4-B RECONCILIATION OF THE PROPRIETARY FUNDS STATEMENT OF NET POSITION TO THE GOVERNMENT -WIDE STATEMENT OF NET POSITION SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Total net position - total proprietary funds $ 858,796,907 Amounts reported for business -type activities in the statement of net position are different because: Solid Waste is a business -type activity that is included in governmental funds. Assets and liabilities relating to Solid Waste are included in business -type activities in the government -wide statement of net position. (14,753,158) Net position of business -type activities $ 844,043,749 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 43 City of Corpus Christi Operating revenues Charges for services - net PROPRIETARY FUNDS STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN NET POSITION YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Enterprise Funds Utility Other System Airport Enterprise Fund Fund Funds Total Exhibit 4-C Internal Service Funds $ 219,743,224 $ 8,248,587 $ 2,113,352 $ 230,105,163 $ 71,004,320 Operating expenses Personal services 32,458,503 4,258,120 695,992 37,412,615 16,437,463 Materials and supplies 35,777,249 461,912 75,306 36,314,467 2,312,228 Contractual services 29,282,576 1,785,263 335,817 31,403,656 21,697,829 Other operating expenses 21,249,832 691,884 302,878 22,244,594 2,353,074 Uncollectible accounts 1,426,856 35,032 29,521 1,491,409 (46,397) Depreciation 33,995,261 5,159,587 613,554 39,768,402 4,155,030 Self-insurance claims -- -- -- -- 30,157,544 Other post employment benefits (Note 10) 807,403 Total operating expenses 154,190,277 12,391,798 2,053,068 168,635,143 77,874,174 Operating income (loss) 65,552,947 (4,143,211) 60,284 61,470,020 (6,869,854) Nonoperating revenues (expenses) Investment income 1,169,357 35,833 6,863 1,212,053 176,857 Interest expense and fiscal charges (36,485,434) (1,010,699) (49,077) (37,545,210) (88,449) Bond issue costs (3,709,701) -- (51,585) (3,761,286) -- Passenger facility charges -- 1,322,682 -- 1,322,682 -- Customer facility charges -- 974,746 -- 974,746 -- Net gain on disposal of assets 293,297 3,222 2,730 299,249 (48,362) Recovery on damage claims 10,952 -- -- 10,952 19,049 Developer deposits 1,524,228 -- -- 1,524,228 -- Reimbursements to developers (578,207) -- -- (578,207) -- Contributions from other governmental agencies 1,207,236 19,099 -- 1,226,335 Totalnonoperating revenues (expenses) (36,568,272) 1,344,883 (91,069) (35,314,458) 59,095 Capital contributions Contributions from other governmental agencies 28,540 20,736,242 605,246 21,370,028 Contributions from developers 5,767,780 -- -- 5,767,780 Contributions from others 38,127 43,726 -- 81,853 Total capital contributions 5,834,447 20,779,968 605,246 27,219,661 Income (loss) before transfers 34,819,122 17,981,640 574,461 53,375,223 (6,810,759) Transfers in (Note 15) 331,500 -- -- 331,500 5,667,226 Transfers out (Note 15) (6,551,357) (335,537) (55,302) (6,942,196) (1,095,221) Total transfers (6,219,857) (335,537) (55,302) (6,610,696) 4,572,005 Net income (loss) 28,599,265 17,646,103 519,159 46,764,527 (2,238,754) Net position at beginning of year 726,735,629 110,524,769 3,660,914 840,921,312 44,635,658 Prior period adjustment for change in accounting for pension liability (Note 9) (25,337,738) (3,080,912) (470,282) (28,888,932) (12,160,813) Adjusted net position at beginning of year 701,397,891 107,443,857 3,190,632 812,032,380 32,474,845 Net position at end of year $ 729,997,156 $ 125,089,960 $ 3,709,791 $ 858,796,907 $ 30,236,091 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 44 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 4-1) RECONCILIATION OF THE PROPRIETARY FUNDS STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN NET POSITION TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Net change in net position - total proprietary funds $ 46,764,527 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of activities are different because: Solid Waste is a business -type activity that is included in governmental funds. The net revenues of the Solid Waste activity are reported in the business -type activities. Operating income $ 8,323,369 Net transfers $ (10,909,823) Investment earnings $ 5,242 (2,581,212) Change in net position of business -type activities $ 44,183,315 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 45 City of Corpus Christi PROPRIETARY FUNDS STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Enterprise Funds Utility Other System Airport Enterprise Fund Fund Funds Total Exhibit 4-E Internal Service Funds Cash flows from operating activities Receipts from customers $ 218,871,200 $ 8,763,561 $ 2,085,630 $ 229,720,391 $ 8,926,971 Receipts from interfund services provided 983,942 -- -- 983,942 71,866,906 Payments to suppliers (60,864,845) (2,651,284) (395,070) (63,911,199) (33,539,964) Payments to employees (28,810,699) (3,931,340) (618,047) (33,360,086) (14,942,813) Internal activity - payments to other funds (26,935,878) (1,073,688) (389,857) (28,399,423) (3,876,504) Claims paid -- - (27,430,088) Other receipts 1,000 1,000 (15,249) Net cash provided by operating activities 103,244,720 1,107,249 682,656 105,034,625 989,259 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities Changes in interfund borrowings (28,500,000) (1,029,019) -- (29,529,019) 14,500,000 Advances from other funds -- -- 29,806 29,806 -- Contributions from other government agencies -- 19,099 -- 19,099 -- Transfers in from other funds 331,500 -- -- 331,500 2,995,321 Transfers out to other funds (6,551,357) (335,537) (55,302) (6,942,196) (763,721) Net cash provided by (used for) noncapital fmancing activities (34,719,857) (1,345,457) (25,496) (36,090,810) 16,731,600 Cash flows from capital and related financing activities Acquisition of capital assets (90,168,129) (24,764,341) (3,517,235) (118,449,705) (4,496,737) Proceeds from sale of capital assets 299,463 3,222 2,730 305,415 75,746 Developers deposits 655,245 -- - 655,245 Capital contributions 38,127 -- - 38,127 Reimbursements to developers 290,776 -- -- 290,776 Contributions from other governmental agencies -- 20,155,204 -- 20,155,204 Passenger facility charge - 1,393,693 - 1,393,693 Customer facility charges -- 996,711 -- 996,711 Proceeds from issuance of revenue bonds 262,539,417 -- 2,548,415 265,087,832 Transfers in from other funds related to capital acquisition -- -- -- -- 2,671,905 Return of prior year transfers related to capital acquisition - - -- - (331,500) Principal paid on long-term debt (39,773,364) (1,193,706) (290,000) (41,257,070) (489,534) Interest expense and fiscal charges (37,853,145) (1,002,718) (93,342) (38,949,205) (88,449) Recovery on damage claims 10,952 -- -- 10,952 -- Net cash provided by (used for) capital and related fmancing activities 96,039,342 (4,411,935) (1,349,432) 90,277,975 (2,658,569) Cash flows from investing activities Investment income Net cash provided by investing activities Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and investments Cash, cash equivalents and investments at beginning of year, including restricted accounts Cash, cash equivalents and investments at end of year, including restricted accounts (Continued) 1,286,435 38,533 1,286,435 38,533 165,850,640 (4,611,610) 252,390,158 15,028,321 6,864 1,3 31,832 199,357 6,864 1,331,832 199,357 (685,408) 1,069,861 160,553,622 15,261, 647 268,488,340 45,358,944 $ 418,240,798 $ 10,416,711 $ 384,453 $ 429,041,962 $ 60,620,591 46 City of Corpus Christi PROPRIETARY FUNDS STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Enterprise Funds Utility Other System Airport Enterprise Fund Fund Funds Total Exhibit 4-E (Continued) Internal Service Funds Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities Operating income (loss) $ 65,552,947 $ (4,143,211) $ 60,284 $ 61,470,020 $ (6,869,854) Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities Depreciation 33,995,261 5,159,587 613,554 39,768,402 4,155,030 Amortization of water rights 2,025,374 -- -- 2,025,374 -- Provision for uncollectible accounts 1,426,856 35,032 29,521 1,491,409 (46,397) Operating costs paid from bond proceeds 7,500 -- - 7,500 -- Recovery on damage claims -- -- -- -- 19,049 Changes in assets and liabilities Receivables (172,593) 197,595 (29,136) (4,134) (235,997) Inventory (203,348) 4,741 - (198,607) 121,106 Prepaid items - -- -- (439,939) Deferred outflows of resources (1,444,577) (239,949) (35,196) (1,719,722) (917,209) Accounts payable (227,001) (108,981) 6,838 (329,144) 591,902 Accrued expenses 6,848 5,899 (3,882) 8,865 (15,747) Deposits 461,157 (2,983) (1,369) 456,805 -- Unearned revenue -- -- 2,784 2,784 9,826 Accumulated unpaid compensated absences 146,312 (28,228) 3,472 121,556 158,481 Net pension liability 764,036 105,107 16,217 885,360 503,188 Net OPEB obligation 69,573 7,493 1,804 78,870 (282,921) Liability to claimants -escheat property (644) -- -- (644) (801) Estimated claims liability -- -- -- -- 3,807,783 Deferred inflows of resources 837,019 115,147 17,765 969,931 431,759 Net cash provided by operating activities $ 103,244,720 $ 1,107,249 $ 682,656 $ 105,034,625 $ 989,259 Noncash investing, capital and financing activities Change in fair value of investments $ 159,037 $ -- $ -- $ 159,037 $ 18,581 Change in accrued interest receivable $ 57,917 $ -- $ -- $ 57,917 $ -- Contribution of capital assets $ 5,767,780 $ -- $ -- $ 5,767,780 $ -- Acquisition of capital assets under capital lease $ 972,680 $ -- $ -- $ 972,680 $ 258,313 Acquisition of capital assets accrued but not paid $ (5,522,361) $ (1,350,760) $ 160,403 $ (6,712,718) $ Bond refunding $ 128,470,146 $ -- $ -- $ 128,470,146 $ Bond issue costs $ 3,709,701 $ -- $ 51,585 $ 3,761,286 $ Build America Bonds interest subsidy $ 1,188,783 $ -- $ -- $ 1,188,783 $ Write-down of water rights due to refunding of underlying debt $ (1,574,240) $ -- $ -- $ (1,574,240) $ The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 47 City of Corpus Christi FIDUCIARY FUNDS STATEMENT OF NET POSITION SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Exhibit 5-A Deferred Private Compensation Purpose Plan Trust Fund ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents (Note 5) $ $ 258,682 Mutual funds Guaranteed Rate Accounts 29,001,275 Stocks 35,587,277 Bonds 2,427,112 Combined Stocks and Bonds 11,658,709 Money Markets 63,270 Receivables Participant loans 1,902,124 Total assets 80,639,767 258,682 LIABILITIES NET POSITION Held in trust for deferred compensation benefits 80,639,767 Held in trust for individuals and organizations -- Total net position The notes to the fmancial statements are an integral part of this statement. 48 258,682 $ 80,639,767 $ 258,682 City of Corpus Christi FIDUCIARY FUNDS STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FIDUCIARY NET POSITION YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Additions Employee contributions Other contributions Earnings on investments Total additions Exhibit 5-B Deferred Private Compensation Purpose Plan Trust Fund $ 5,460,385 $ 851,342 6,311,727 700 121 821 Deductions Payment of benefits 6,651,828 Administrative fees 23,975 -- Disbursements for designated purposes -- 500 Total deductions 6,675,803 500 Net increase (decrease) (364,076) 321 Net position at beginning of year 81,003,843 258,361 Net position at end of year $ 80,639,767 $ 258,682 The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 49 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 City of Corpus Christi NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The City of Corpus Christi (the City) was incorporated in 1852 and operates as a Council -Manager form of government. The principal services accounted for as general governmental functions include public safety, health, streets, sanitation, parks and recreation, planning, zoning, and general administrative services. The accounting and reporting policies of the City relating to the funds include in the accompanying basic financial statements conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) applicable to state and local governments. Generally accepted accounting principles for local governments include those principles prescribed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The more significant accounting policies of the City are described below. A. Reporting Entity In evaluating the City as a reporting entity, management has addressed all potential component units for which the City may be financially accountable and, as such, should be included within the City's financial statements. The City (the primary government) is financially accountable if it appoints a voting majority of the organization's governing board and (1) it is able to impose its will on the organization, or (2) there is a potential for the organization to provide specific financial benefits to or burdens on the City. Additionally, the primary government is required to consider other organizations for which the nature and significance of their relationship with the primary government are such that exclusion would cause the reporting entity's financial statements to be misleading or incomplete. The financial statements are formatted to allow the user to clearly distinguish between the primary government and its component units. Because of the closeness of their relationship with the primary government (the City), some component units are blended as though they are part of the primary government. Discretely presented component units are reported in a separate column in the government -wide financial statements to emphasize that they are legally separate from the government. Blended Component Units The Corpus Christi Community Improvement Corporation was formed to provide financing for the rehabilitation of residential property in the City. The Corpus Christi Housing Finance Corporation and the Corpus Christi Industrial Development Corporation promote business development and issue housing revenue or industrial development bonds. The City manages the day-to-day operations of these corporations. The Mayor and Council Members are directors of the corporations. The Corpus Christi Crime Control and Prevention District (District) is a public non-profit corporation created under State law to provide funding for public safety programs. Although the District is legally separate from the City, the District is reported as if it were part of the primary government because it is a financing mechanism for the City to provide public safety to the citizens of the City. The Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation (CCBJDC) is a public non-profit corporation created by State law to provide funding of voter approved capital improvement programs. The City Council appoints the Board and has financial accountability. Although it is legally separate from the City, CCBJDC is reported as if it were part of the primary government because its primary purpose is to issue revenue bonds to finance major capital improvements on behalf of the City. North Padre Island Development Corporation (NPIDC) was created by the City pursuant to the Tax Increment Financing Act to facilitate development of the land within the boundaries of the tax increment zone, namely Packery Channel. NPIDC became effective on November 14, 2000, and will terminate on December 31, 2022. The receipt of post -2000 incremental property taxes from taxing units with property within the boundaries of the zone provides the funding for its projects. The Mayor and Council Members are a voting majority of the board, and the City manages its day-to-day operations. 51 City of Corpus Christi Complete financial statements for each of the individual blended component units may be obtained from the City's Director of Financial Services at 1201 Leopard Street, Corpus Christi, Texas 78401. Discretely Presented Component Units The component unit column in the government -wide financial statements includes the financial data of the City's other component units for which the City Council appoints the majority of the Board and has financial accountability. The Coastal Bend Health Facilities Development Corporation (CBHFDC) is a public, non-profit corporation created by the City under State law to facilitate financing and development of health and health-related facilities. The City Council has authority to remove board members at will, and therefore has the ability to impose its will on the organization. CBHFDC is presented as a governmental fund type. The Corpus Christi Convention and Visitors Bureau (Visitors Bureau) is a private Texas nonprofit corporation organized for the purpose of promoting convention and visitors' activity in the Corpus Christi Bay area. The City has a contractual obligation to support the Visitors Bureau with a portion of Hotel Occupancy Taxes and has a financial benefit/burden relationship. The Visitors Bureau is presented as a governmental fund type. For presentation purposes, the Visitors Bureau's financial statements have been adjusted to eliminate liabilities included in the City's financial statements. Coastal Bend Corpus Christi Health Facilities Convention Development and Visitors Corporation Bureau Assets Current assets $ 3,719 $ 1,243,449 Capital assets -- 280,423 Total assets 3,719 1,523,872 Current liabilities -- 314,420 Net position Invested in capital assets -- 280,423 Unrestricted 3,719 929,029 Total net position $ 3,719 $ 1,209,452 Revenues $ $ 5,463,033 Expenses 5,113,108 Change in net position -- 349,925 Net position at beginning of year 3,719 859,527 Net position at end of year $ 3,719 $ 1,209,452 The component unit combining statements reflect these discretely presented units. Complete financial statements for each of the individual component units may be obtained at the entity's administrative offices: Coastal Bend Health Facilities Development Corporation 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Corpus Christi Convention and Visitors Bureau 101 North Shoreline, Suite 430 Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Governmental accounting standards require reasonable separation between the primary government (including its blended components units) and its discretely presented component units, both in the financial statements and in the related notes and required supplementary information. Because the discretely presented component units, although legally separate, have been and are operated as if each is part of the primary government, there are limited instances where special note reference or separation will be required. If no separate note reference or categorization is made, 52 City of Corpus Christi the user should assume that information presented is equally applicable to the City and the component units. B. Related Organizations and Jointly Governed Organizations Related organizations and jointly governed organizations provide services within the City that are administered by separate boards or commissions, but the City is not financially accountable, and such organizations are therefore not component units of the City, even though the City Council may appoint a voting majority of an organization's board members. Consequently, financial information for the Coastal Bend Council of Governments, the Regional Transit Authority, the Corpus Christi Housing Authority, the Corpus Christi Regional Economic Development Corporation, and the Port of Corpus Christi Authority are not included in these financial statements. C. Government -wide and Fund Financial Statements The government -wide financial statements (i.e., the statement of net position and the statement of changes in net position) report information on all of the non -fiduciary activities of the primary government and its component units. Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues, are reported separately from business -type activities, which rely to a significant extent on fees and charges for support or services. Accordingly, the primary government is reported separately from certain legally separate component units for which the primary government is financially accountable. Both the government -wide and fund financial statements categorize activities as either governmental activities or business -type activities. In the government -wide statement of net position, both the governmental and business -type activities columns are (1) presented on a consolidated basis by column, and (2) reflected on a full accrual, economic resource basis, which incorporates long-term assets and receivables as well as long-term debt and obligations. The government -wide statement of activities reflects both the gross and net cost per functional category (police and municipal court, fire, streets, etc.) which are otherwise being supported by general government revenues (e.g., property taxes, sales taxes, certain intergovernmental revenues). The statement of activities reduces gross expenses (including depreciation) by related program revenues, operating and capital grants. The program revenues must be directly associated with the function or a business -type activity. Program revenues include revenues from charges for services, franchise fees, fines and forfeitures, licenses and permits fees, and special assessments. The operating grants include operating -specific and discretionary (either operating or capital) grants while the capital grants column reflects capital -specific grants. The government -wide statement focuses on the substantiality of the City as an entity and the change in aggregate financial position resulting from the activities of the fiscal period. The City's solid waste activity is included in governmental funds in the fund financial statements and as a business - type activity in the government -wide financial statements. This presentation is appropriate because the City does not have a pricing policy for solid waste designed to recover its cost. Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds (excluded from the government -wide financial statements). Emphasis is on the major funds in either the governmental or business -type categories. Non -major funds (by category) or fund type are summarized into a single column. D. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statement Preparation The governmental funds major fund statements in the fund financial statements are presented on a current financial resource and modified accrual basis of accounting. This is the manner in which these funds are normally budgeted. This presentation is deemed most appropriate to (1) demonstrate legal and covenant compliance, (2) demonstrate the source and use of liquid resources, and (3) demonstrate how the City's actual experience conforms to the budget or fiscal plan. Since the governmental fund statements are presented on a different measurement focus and basis of accounting than the government -wide statements governmental column, a reconciliation is presented on the page following each statement which briefly explains the adjustments necessary to transform the fund based financial statements into the governmental column of the government -wide presentation. 53 City of Corpus Christi Proprietary funds statements are used to account for activities that are similar to those often found in the private sector. All assets, liabilities, equities, revenues, expenses, and payments relating to the government's business activities are accounted for through proprietary funds. The measurement focus is on determination of operating income, financial position, changes in net position and cash flows. Operating revenues include charges for services. Operating expenses include costs of services as well as materials, contracts, personnel, and depreciation. All revenues and expenses not meeting these definitions are reported as non-operating revenues and expenses. Enterprise funds account for operations that are financed in a manner similar to private business enterprises, where the intent is that costs of providing goods or services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. The City's enterprise funds account for the operations of the City's utility system, airport, golf centers and marina Internal service funds of a government (which traditionally provide services primarily to other funds of the government) are presented in the summary form as part of the proprietary fund fmancial statements. The City's internal service funds account for printing and messenger services, maintaining an inventory of commonly used supplies, vehicle and building maintenance, data processing and process automation, wired and wireless internet, voice and video communication, risk management, and engineering services to other departments within the City on a cost -reimbursement basis. Since the principal users of the internal services are the City's governmental activities, financial statements of internal service funds are consolidated into the governmental column when presented at the government -wide level in the Statement of Net Position. The net activity of these services is offset against the appropriate functional activity in the Statement of Activities. This complies with the City's policy of eliminating internal activity from the government -wide statements. The City's fiduciary funds are presented in the fund financial statements by type (pension and private -purpose). Since by definition these assets are being held for the benefit of a third party (e.g., other local governments, private parties, pension participants) and cannot be used to finance activities or obligations of the government, these funds are not incorporated into the government -wide statements. The City's fiduciary funds are used to account for the assets in the deferred compensation plans of the City held in trust for the exclusive benefit of the employees, as well as to account for the severance package for the City Manager. The focus is on the City as a whole and the fund financial statements, including the major individual funds of the governmental and business -type categories, as well as the fiduciary funds, and the component units. Each presentation provides valuable information that can be analyzed and compared to enhance the usefulness of the information. The financial transactions of the City are recorded in individual funds. Each fund is accounted for by providing a separate set of self -balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, reserves, fund equity, revenues and expenditures/expenses. The various funds are reported by generic classification within the financial statements. The criteria used to determine if a governmental or enterprise fund should be reported as a major fund are as follows: the total assets, liabilities, revenues or expenditures/expenses of that governmental or enterprise fund are at least 10% of the corresponding element total for all funds of that category or type (that is, total governmental or total enterprise funds), and the same element that met the 10% criterion above in the governmental or enterprise fund is at least 5% of the corresponding element total for all governmental and enterprise funds combined. The Street Capital Project Fund is presented as a major fund for consistency with prior years. The non -major funds are combined in a single column in the fund financial statements. The City reports the following major funds: The general fund is the general operating fund of the City. It is used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. The debt service fund is used to account for funds needed to make principal and interest payments on outstanding bonds when due. The City reports this fund as a major fund because of public interest and consistency between years. The streets capital projects fund is used to account for capital improvements to streets funded mainly through long-term debt and participation of other governmental entities. 54 City of Corpus Christi The utility system fund is used to account for the operations of the City's combined utilities. The Utility System includes the City's water and storm water system, wastewater disposal system and gas distribution system. The airport fund is used to account for the operations of the Corpus Christi International Airport. Basis of accounting refers to the point at which revenues or expenditures/expenses are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. It relates to the timing of the measurements made, regardless of the measurement focus applied. The government -wide financial statements and the proprietary, fiduciary and component unit financial statements are presented on an accrual basis of accounting. The governmental funds in the fund financial statements are presented on a modified accrual basis. Accrual Revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recognized when incurred. Modified Accrual Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and are accounted for using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized when susceptible to accrual; i.e., when they become both measurable and available. "Measurable" means the amount of the transaction can be determined and "available" means collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to be used to pay liabilities of the current period. The City considers revenues as available if they are collected within 60 days after year-end for taxes and 120 days for other revenue accruals. Expenditures are recorded when the related fund liability is incurred. However, debt service expenditures, except for interest payable accrued at the debt issuance date for which cash is received with the debt proceeds, as well as expenditures related to compensated absences, are recorded only when payment has matured and will be payable shortly after year-end. The revenues susceptible to accrual are property taxes, franchise fees, licenses, charges for service, interest income and intergovernmental revenues. Sales taxes collected and held by the state at year-end on behalf of the government are also recognized as revenue. All other governmental fund revenues are recognized when received, as they are deemed immaterial. E. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments Cash balances of all City funds (except for the Deferred Compensation Plan) are pooled for investment purposes and each fund has equity in the pooled amount. In prior years, Cash and Cash Equivalents were broken out separately from Investments. In fiscal year 2015, Investments were reclassified into Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Investments on Balance Sheets, Statements of Net Position, and Statements of Cash Flows. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments are included in both unrestricted as well as restricted assets. The City can legally invest in certificates of deposit, repurchase agreements, obligations of the U.S. Government, and its Agencies or instrumentalities, and State obligations. The types of investments made by the Deferred Compensation Plan are not restricted and are carried at fair value. The City's investments are stated at fair value, except for money market investments with a remaining maturity of one year or less when purchased and nonparticipating interest earning investment contracts, which are stated at cost. Net change in the fair value of investments is recognized and reported as investment income in the financial statements. Interest earned on investments and unrealized gain/loss resulting from valuation is allocated to each fund based on the fund's overall cash balance. 55 City of Corpus Christi F. Receivables Amounts reported in the fund financial statements as interfund receivables and payables are eliminated in the government -wide governmental and business -type activities columns of the statement of net assets, except for the net residual amounts due between governmental and business -type activities, which are presented as internal balances. Within the governmental fund financial statements, long-term advances and long-term receivables are reflected as unspendable fund balance indicating they do not constitute available expendable resources. All trade and property tax receivables are shown net of an allowance for uncollectibles. Trade accounts receivable in excess of 120 days comprise the trade accounts receivable allowance for uncollectibles. The property tax receivable allowance is equal to 51% percent of outstanding property taxes at the end of the fiscal year. Utility revenue is recorded when earned. Customers are billed monthly. The estimated value of services provided but unbilled has been included in the accompanying financial statements. G. Inventories and prepaid items Inventories are valued at cost, which approximates market, using either the first-in/first-out (FIFO) method or the average cost method. The costs of governmental fund -type inventories are recorded as expenditures when consumed rather than when purchased. Certain payments to vendors reflect costs applicable to future accounting periods and are recorded as prepaid items in both government -wide and fund financial statements. H. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates. I. Capital Assets Capital assets purchased or acquired are carried at historical cost or estimated historical cost. City policy has set the capitalization threshold for reporting capital assets at $5,000. Contributed assets are recorded at fair market value as of the date donated. Additions, improvements and other capital outlays that significantly extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized. Other costs incurred for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Depreciation on capital assets is calculated on the straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: Assets Life in Years Dams 100 Water rights 35-50 Water pipeline 40-50 Gas pipelines 40-57 Infrastructure 40-50 Utility plants 40-45 Runways and related improvements 25 Terminals and hangers 50 Buildings 40 Improvements other than buildings 20 Vehicles 4-6 Machinery and equipment 4-15 Office furniture 12 The City has a collection of art housed in the Corpus Christi Museum of Science and History. The collection is not capitalized because it meets all the following conditions. 56 City of Corpus Christi • The collection is held for reasons other than financial gain. • The collection is protected, kept unencumbered, cared for, and preserved. • The collection is subject to City policy requiring that the proceeds from sales of collection items be used to acquire other items for collections. Interest is capitalized on assets, other than infrastructure assets, acquired with tax-exempt debt. The amount of interest capitalized is the net interest expense incurred (interest expense less interest income) from the date of the borrowing until completion of the project. J. Restricted Assets Certain debt proceeds of the City's enterprise funds, as well as certain resources set aside for their repayment, are classified as restricted assets on the balance sheet because their use is limited by applicable bond covenants. Developer trust funds are also classified as restricted. All revenues received from passenger facility charges (PFC) are reported as restricted assets in the Airport Fund. In accordance with Federal Regulations, PFC funds can only be expended on projects approved by the Federal Aviation Administration. Current approved projects include runway pavement reconstruction, terminal improvements, and runway lighting. It is management's intention to use a portion of the PFC funds on approved projects on a pay-as- you-go basis with the remaining funds to be used to support approved airport revenue bond issues debt service. Certain assets of governmental funds are reclassified as restricted for presentation on the government -wide statement of net position due to the restriction on the use of these funds for a particular purpose. When an expense is incurred for purposes for which both restricted and unrestricted assets are available, the City's policy is to apply restricted assets first. K. Accumulated Unpaid Compensated Absences It is the City's policy to permit employees to accumulate earned but unused vacation and sick pay benefits. These benefits are accounted for using the termination payment method. All compensated absences are accrued when incurred in the government -wide and proprietary fund financial statements. Expenditures are recorded in the governmental funds as employees resign or retire. Compensated absence liabilities are normally paid from the funds reporting payroll and related expenditures including the general fund and special revenue funds. L. Long-term Obligations In the government -wide financial statements and proprietary fund types in the fund financial statements, long-term debt and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicable governmental activities, business - type activities, or proprietary fund type statement of net position. Bond premiums and discounts are deferred and amortized over the life of the bonds using the effective interest method. Bonds payable are reported net of the applicable bond premium or discount. Gains or losses on Enterprise Fund refundings are reported as deferred inflows or outflows and are amortized over the term of the lesser of the new bonds or the refunded bonds using the effective interest method. Bond issuance costs are recognized as expenditures/expenses when incurred. In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and discounts, as well as bond issuance costs, during the current period. The face amount of debt issued is reported as other financing sources. Premiums received on debt issuances are reported as other financing sources while discounts on debt issuances are reported as other financing uses. Bond issuance costs are shown in debt service expenditures. M. Pension Plans For purposes of measuring the net pension liability, deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions, and pension expense, information about the Fiduciary Net Position of the Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) and the Fire Fighters Retirement System (FFRS) and additions to/deductions from TMRS's and FFRS's Fiduciary Net Position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by TMRS and FFRS. For this purpose, plan contributions are recognized in the period that compensation is reported for the 57 City of Corpus Christi employee, which is when contributions are legally due. Benefit payments and refunds are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported at fair value. N. Fund Equity In the government -wide financial statements and proprietary fund financial statements, net position is classified in the following categories: Net Invested in Capital Assets This category represents the net carrying value of all capital assets, reduced by the outstanding balances of long -teen debt that are attributable to the acquisition, construction or improvement of these assets. Restricted The restricted component of net position represents restricted assets reduced by liabilities related to those assets. This category represents external restrictions imposed by creditors, grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments and restrictions imposed by law through constitutional provisions or enabling legislation. Unrestricted This category is the "residual" component of net position. It consists of net position that does not meet the definition of "restricted" or "net invested in capital assets." In the governmental fund financial statements, the components of fund balances reflect policies and procedures established by actions of the City Council and its designated officials. The nonspendable fund balance includes the portion of net resources that cannot be spent because of their form or because they must be maintained intact. Resources not in spendable form include inventories and prepaid items, long-term advances, long-term receivables, and nonfinancial assets held for resale. Some resources are spendable but are legally or contractually required to be maintained intact. Such resources include the principal of an endowment. The restricted fund balance includes net resources that can be spent only for the specific purposes stipulated by constitution, external resource providers (creditors, grantors, contributors), laws and regulations of other governments, or through enabling legislation. The enabling legislation authorizes the City to assess, levy, charge or otherwise mandate payment of resources from external resource providers; those resources can be used only for the specific purposes stipulated in the legislation. The City revenue generated through enabling legislation includes Municipal and Juvenile Court fees, Vital Records fees, Redlight Photo Enforcement fines, and taxes from Crime Control District, CCBJDC, and tax increment zones. The committed fund balance includes spendable net resources that can only be used for specific purposes pursuant to constraints imposed by Council ordinance or resolution no later than the close of the fiscal year. Those constraints remain binding unless removed or changed in the same manner employed to previously commit those resources. The assigned fund balance includes amounts that are constrained by the City's intent to be used for specific purposes, but are neither restricted nor committed. The City Council, the City Manager, or his designee has the authority to assign amounts for a specific purpose as per City Charter, Article I, Section 3 which states, "...the (City) Council...shall enact local legislation, determine policies, appoint the city manager, and which council and city manager shall execute the laws and administer the government of the city." Constraints imposed on the use of assigned amounts can be removed with no formal Council action. The residual fund balance that is not Restricted or Committed in governmental funds except the General Fund is assigned. The unassigned fund balance represents the spendable net resources that have not been restricted, committed, or assigned to specific purposes. 58 City of Corpus Christi Spending Prioritization in Using Available Resources When both restricted resources and other resources (i.e., committed, assigned, and unassigned) can be used for the same purpose, the City budget considers restricted resources to be spent first. When committed, assigned, and unassigned resources can be used for the same purpose, the flow assumption in the City budget is to spend in the sequence of committed resources first, assigned second, and unassigned last. General Fund Balance Requirements Caused by Council Actions or Management's Intended Use The General Fund Reserve for Major Contingencies is established by the City Council to be maintained at a minimum of 10% and up to 25% of General Fund annual appropriations to provide funding for any unforeseen circumstances that may arise such as an economic slowdown, emergencies, or natural disasters. It is not intended for normal unanticipated expenditures. It has a balance of $39,525,111 and is classified as committed resources. The Government Access Equipment Reserve reflects required contributions made by cable television franchisees set aside for capital needs of government access cable television system or facilities. It has a balance $11,959 and is classified as committed resources. The Reserve for Radio System Capital Replacement was established through an inter -local agreement with the Regional Transportation Authority regarding an 800 MHz public safety trunked radio system. When other governmental entities wish to participate in the system, a fee is collected based on the proportionate share of radios they will use. Moneys received from these entities are held in reserve to be used for capital replacements and upgrades for the backbone of the system. It has a balance of $27,925 and is classified as committed resources. P. Recent Accounting Pronouncements The GASB has issued the following statements which became effective for fiscal year 2015. Statement No. 68, "Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions"— This statement changes the focus of pension accounting for employers from whether they are responsibly funding their plan over time to a point -in -time liability that is reflected in the employer's financial statements for any actuarially unfunded portion of benefits earned to date. Statement No. 71, "Pension Transition for Contributions Made Subsequent to the Measurement Date" — This statement eliminates the source of a potential significant understatement of adjusted beginning net position and expense in the first year of implementation of Statement 68 in the accrual -basis financial statements of employers and non -employer contributing entities. Implementation of GASB No. 68 and No. 71 resulted in prior period adjustments for the elimination of the previously reported net pension obligation, the recording of the beginning net pension liability and the beginning deferred outflow for contributions made after the measurement date. A breakdown of the elements of the prior period adjustments are shown below: 59 City of Corpus Christi Prior period adjustment Fund Level Government -wide Statement of Activities Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position - Proprietary funds Governmental Business -type Enterprise Internal Activities Activities Funds Service Funds Elimination of net pension obligation as of Sept. 30, 2014 $ 29,449,981 $ 11,047,116 $ 9,195,385 $ 4,200,207 Recording of net pension liability as of Sept. 30, 2014 (197,653,236) (49,371,797) (41,264,876) (17,748,466) Deferral for pension contributions made after the measurement date 14,107,462 3,805,194 3,180,559 1,387,446 Prior period adjustment $ (154,095,793) $ (34,519,487) $ (28,888,932) $ (12,160,813) The GASB has issued the following statements which will become effective in future years. Statement No. 75, "Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions" — This statement changes the focus of accounting of postemployment benefits other than pension from whether they are responsibly funding the benefits over time to a point -in -time liability that is reflected on the employer's financial statements for any actuarially unfunded portion of benefits earned to date. This statement will become effective for the City in fiscal year 2018. Statement No. 77, "Tax Abatement Disclosures" — This statement requires governments that enter into tax abatement agreements to provide certain disclosures regarding these commitments. This statement will become effective for the City in fiscal year 2016. 2. Budget Policy and Budgetary Accounting City Charter requires the City Manager to submit a proposed budget to the City Council at least sixty days prior to August 1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing them. Public hearings are conducted to obtain taxpayer comments. The budget and tax levy are legally enacted through the passage of ordinances. Budgets are prepared for all governmental funds except the Federal/State grant fund, the capital projects funds, the community enrichment fund, the infrastructure fund, the Corpus Christi Community Improvement Corporation (CCCIC), the Corpus Christi Housing Finance Corporation (CCHFC), the Coastal Bend Cultural and Educational Facilities Finance Corporation (CBCEFFC), and the Corpus Christi Industrial Development Corporation (CCIDC). The Federal/State grant fund and the capital projects funds adopt project -length budgets. Budgets are not adopted for the community enrichment fund, the infrastructure fund, CCCIC, CCHFC, CBCEFFC and the CCIDC. The budgets are prepared on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles, except that expenditures financed by capital leases are not included in the governmental fund budgets, principal and interest payments are included in the activity expenditures and reimbursements are accounted for as revenues rather than reductions of expenditures. Additionally, Development Services is separately budgeted but does not meet the criteria to be a special revenue fund and thus is included in the General Fund. The detail of these differences is included in the statement of revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balance — budget (GAAP basis) and actual in the column titled "Adjustments to Budget Basis." All annual appropriations lapse at fiscal year end. 60 City of Corpus Christi The appropriated budget is prepared by fund, department, and activity. The City Manager is authorized to transfer appropriations at the object of expenditure level and department levels within any fund. Any revisions that alter the total appropriations of any fund must be approved by the City Council. During the year, several supplemental appropriations were necessary. All budget amounts presented reflect the original budget and the amended budget (which have been adjusted for legally authorized revisions to the annual budget during the year). Encumbrance accounting is employed in governmental funds. Encumbrances represent commitments related to unperformed contracts for goods or services. Under encumbrance accounting, purchase orders, contracts and other commitments for the expenditure of resources are recorded to reserve that portion of the applicable appropriation. Encumbrances outstanding at year end are reported as assigned fund balances and do not constitute expenditures or liabilities until the commitments are honored by inclusion in the subsequent year's budget. 3. Sales Tax Revenue The City has a 1% city sales tax, a 0.125% sales tax for crime control, a 0.125% sales tax for construction of a multipurpose arena, a 0.125% sales tax for improvements to the downtown seawall, and a 0.125% sales tax for economic development and the construction of a baseball stadium. Sales tax is collected monthly by the State of Texas and remitted to the City. The tax is collected by the merchants, remitted to the State, and then paid to the City by the 10th of the month following collection from the merchants A two-month lag exists between collection by the merchant and payment to the City by the State. In governmental funds, sales tax revenue is recognized in the period when the underlying exchange transaction has occurred and the resources are available. 4. Property Taxes Property taxes attach, as an enforceable lien, on property as of January 1. The City's property tax is levied each October 1 on the basis of assessed values at the date the enforceable lien attaches. Appraised values are established by the Nueces County Appraisal District, assessed at 100% of appraised value, approved by the Nueces County Appraisal Review Board, and certified by the Chief Appraiser. Responsibility for the billing and collection of the City's taxes is contracted to Nueces County as an efficiency measure. Taxes are due on receipt of the tax bill and are delinquent if not paid before February of the year following the year in which imposed. Taxes become delinquent on February 1 at which time penalty and interest charges are applicable. Property tax revenues are recorded as revenues when they become available. On July 31, property tax receivables are fully deferred because collections received within the following sixty days are immaterial. As permitted by the Constitution of the State of Texas, home rule cities of over 5,000 population shall have a total tax allowable of $2.50 and shall have a bond allowable of $1.50 per $100 valuations (unless City Charter provides less). On April 3, 1993, the citizens of Corpus Christi voted to amend the City Charter which contained a tax limitation of $0.68 per $100 of assessed value for all purposes including debt service. The amended charter provided for the tax rate to increase up to the State limit, $1.50 per $100 of assessed value, for voter approved debt after April 4, 1993. The State total tax and bond allowable is computed based on 90% collections. The FY 2014-2015 tax rates (tax year 2014) were $0.376806 for the general fund and $0.208458 for debt service for a total of $0.585264 per $100 of assessed value. Therefore, the City's tax margin of $0.0947360 per $100 of assessed value could raise up to $16,075,847 in additional taxes each year based on the assessed value of $16,969,100,716. The City could raise up to $186,454,493 in additional taxes for voter approved tax supported obligations, based on the assessed valuation of $16,969,100,716 and a debt margin of $1.098788 calculated on 90% collections. 5. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments In accordance with City policy, the total bank deposits of $34,802,802 were covered by Federal Depository Insurance (FDIC) or by collateral held by the City's agent in the City's name. The cash funds and short-term 61 City of Corpus Christi investments included in cash and cash equivalents are not subject to collateralization requirements. The discretely presented component units had total cash and cash equivalents of $1,064,309 which were covered by FDIC or were secured by collateral held by the City's or component unit's agent in the name of the City or the component unit. As of September 30, 2015, the City had the following cash, cash equivalents and investments: Weighted Average Type Carrying Value Fair Value Maturity (Years) Investments U.S. Government Securities Federal Agency Coupon Securities and Discount Notes $ 479,823,956 $ 480,073,136 1.052 Local government investment pools -overnight 242,537,652 242,537,652 0.003 Money market funds 111,261,900 111,261,900 0.003 Investment allowance 202,551 202,551 Accrued interest receivable 440,119 440,119 Total Investments 834,266,178 834,515,358 Portfolio weighted average maturity 0.607 Cash and Cash Equivalents Deposits in Bank $ 34,802,802 $ 34,802,802 Cash Funds 31,885 31,885 Total Cash and Cash Equivalents 34,834,687 34,834,687 Total Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Investments $ 869,100,865 $ 869,350,045 Interest rate risk— In accordance with the City's investment policy, the City manages its exposure to declines in fair values by limiting the weighted average maturity of its investment portfolio to less than 365 days. Credit risk - Texas statutes authorize the City to invest in (1) obligations of the United States or its agencies and instrumentalities; (2) direct obligations of the State of Texas or its agencies and instrumentalities; (3) collateralized mortgage obligations directly issued by a Federal agency or instrumentality of the United States, the underlying security for which is guaranteed by an agency or instrumentality of the United States; (4) other obligations, the principal and interest of which are unconditionally guaranteed, insured by, or backed by the full faith and credit of, this State or the United States or their respective agencies and instrumentalities; and (5) obligations of states, agencies, counties, cities, and other political subdivisions of any state (rated as to investment quality by a nationally recognized investment rating firm not less than "A" or its equivalent). Public funds investment pools in Texas (Pools) are established under the authority of the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 79 of the Texas Government Code, and are subject to the provisions of the Public Funds Investment Act (PFIA), Chapter 2256 of the Texas Government Code. In addition to other provisions of the PFIA designed to promote liquidity and safety of principal, the (PFIA) requires Pools to: (1) have an advisory board composed of participants in the pool and other persons who do not have a business relationship with the pool and are qualified to advise the pool; (2) maintain a continuous rating of no lower than AAA or AAA -m or an equivalent rating by at least one nationally recognized rating service; and (3) maintain the fair value of its underlying investment portfolio within one half of one percent of the value of its shares. All investments noted above have been rated AAA -m by Standard & Poor's and AAA by Moody's. Concentration of credit risk — According to the City's investment policy, the maximum amount that may be invested in any one public funds investment pool is five percent of the total current invested balance of the Public Funds Investment Pool. The maximum total amount that may be invested in any one overnight Public Funds Investment Pool is thirty percent of the Investment Portfolio. There is no limit on the percent of the total Investment Portfolio that may be invested in public funds pools overall. Custodial credit risk - deposits — In the case of deposits, this is the risk that in the event of a bank failure, the City's deposits may not be returned to it. The City's deposits, including blended component units, held at financial institutions at year end were entirely covered by federal depository insurance (FDIC) or were secured by collateral held by the City's agent in the City's name. 62 City of Corpus Christi Custodial credit risk — investments - For an investment, this is the risk that, in the event of failure of the counterparty, the City will not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. This type of transaction is not addressed by the City's investment policy, and therefore, is not an investment option for the City at this time. Securities Lending — The City engaged in securities lending transactions under a contract with its lending agent, Frost Bank. Authority to engage in these transactions is authorized under the Texas Public Funds Investment Act (the Act) and the City's Investment Policy. The City had authorized Frost Bank to loan up to 100.0% of the par value of its investments in the City's Portfolio, consisting of agency and treasury securities, in securities lending transactions up to March 31, 2015 at which time Frost Bank exited the securities lending business. Securities lending collateral is reported on the balance sheet as an asset, with a corresponding liability for the obligation to repay the collateral. In securities lending transactions, the City, through its lending agent, transfers securities to approved borrowers in exchange for collateral and simultaneously agrees to return the collateral for the same securities in the future. Cash collateral received from borrowers may be invested in `AAA' -rated money market mutual funds or investments that adhere to the Act and the City's Investment Policy. The liquidity provided by the money market mutual funds allows for the easy return of collateral upon termination of a security loan. As of September 30, 2015, no cash collateral was invested in next day money market funds. Securities lending income is earned if the investment returns on the cash collateral exceeds the rebate paid to borrowers of the securities. The income is then split with the lending agent to cover its fees based on a contractually negotiated rate (50.0% allocated to the City and 50.0% allocated to Frost Bank). In the event that the investment income of the cash collateral does not provide a return that exceeds the rebate or if the investment incurs a loss of principal, the payment to the borrower would come from the City and the lending agent based on the negotiated rate split. Loans that are collateralized with securities generate income when the borrower pays a loan premium for the securities borrowed. This income is split at the same rate as the earnings for cash collateral. The collateral pledged to the City for the loaned securities is held by the lending agent or the triparty bank These securities are not available to the City for selling or pledging unless the borrower is in default of the loan. All collateral received is required to have a fair value of 102.0% of the loaned securities. Securities are marked to market daily and additional cash or securities are required from the borrower if the fair value of the collateral falls below 102.0%. Cash collateral is reported on the balance sheet as an asset, with a corresponding liability for the obligation to repay the cash collateral. Noncash collateral for securities lending activities is not recorded as an asset because it remains under the control of the transferor, except in the event of default. In the event of default, where the borrower is unable to return the securities borrowed, the City has authorized the lending agent to seize the borrower's collateral. The collateral would then be used to replace the borrowed securities where possible. Due to some market conditions, it is possible that the original securities may not be able to be replaced. The lending agent has indemnified the City from any loss due to borrower default in the event the collateral is insufficient to replace the securities. At September 30, 2015, the City had no custodial credit risk exposure to borrowers because Frost Bank exited the securities lending business on March 31, 2015. There were no violations of legal or contractual provisions nor were there any borrower or lending agent default losses related to securities lending in fiscal year 2015. 6. Budgetary Data General Fund budget amendments approved during the year included the following: ($1,094,562) to revenues and other financing sources comprised of: • ($1,291,491) due to elimination of the Medicaid 1115 Waiver Para Medicine project 63 City of Corpus Christi • $2,000 donation received from Exxon Mobil for the purchase of equipment for Police Department • $21,899 reimbursement from TX State Library & Archives Commission for library technology services • $39,533 back filing of E911 fees from Vonage • $18,497 revenue from the sale of lead ballast from the Santa Maria for repairs & restoration of the Nina Columbus Ship • $110,000 additional towing fee revenue • $5,000 Port Industry donation $6,145,949 to expenditures and other financing sources comprised of: • $2,441,416 for encumbrances approved to carry forward from the end of the prior fiscal year • $2,000 for the purchase of equipment for Police Department from donation received • $166,500 for contract with Off Duty Bike Patrol Officers and Security Ambassadors patrol • $21,899 for library technology services reimbursed from TX State Library & Archives Commission • $1,077,424 transfer to Municipal Information Systems Fund for implementation of the Infor Enterprise Resource Planning system • $1,000,000 transfer to Street Maintenance Fund for the residential and local street program • $176,712 for additional costs related to the runoff elections held in December, 2014 • $39,533 for expenditures related to the 911 Call line from back filing of E911 fees from Vonage • $293,472 for early completion of the Downtown Area Development Plan • $507,190 for purchase of six sedans and one light & air truck • $18,497 for repairs & restoration of the Nina Columbus Ship from revenue from the sale of lead ballast from the Santa Maria • $25,500 for electronic equipment and related training in the Municipal Court from fund balance restricted for Municipal Court improvements • $110,000 to pay for towing services from towing fee revenue • $5,000 to pay Texas A&M University to develop a plan for identifying gaps in family and youth support services from a Port Industry donation • $185,082 for City website redesign • ($1,291,491) due to elimination of the Medicaid 1115 Waiver Para Medicine project • $267,215 for repairs to Police Department roof • $1,100,000 transfer to Debt Service Fund for debt service on Certificates of Obligation to be issued for Solid Waste and Landfill facilities Budget variances to expenditures and transfers include the following: • General Government is under -budget by $4,584,897. This includes $204,433 in Intergovernmental Relations for professional service contracts partially paid by other funds, and other contracts continuing into FY2016 were rolled into next year's budget. $263,418 for elections costs to be paid in FY2016 for the City Secretary department. In Human Relations there was a personnel budget surplus of $133,202 with the majority of the savings in the training activity. Reserve Appropriations of $2,064,045 are budgeted in the General Government function, but are allocated as needed during the year to other departments. Public Information was under -budget by $331,851 because a Website redesign contract budgeted in FY2015 was not awarded until FY2016. Uncollectible expenses were under -budget, including $250,000 for solid waste collections which were budgeted based on the average of prior three years. $208,000 of other receivables that had been recorded in the Allowance for uncollectible accounts in the prior year were collected in FY2015. • Police Department and Municipal Court were under -budget by $645,143 due to professional services related to Municipal Court software (INCODE) commitments rolling over to next year, and vacancy salary savings in Municipal Court, City Marshalls, and MetroCom, partially offset by significant overtime expenditures in the Police Uniform Division. • Fire and Ambulance is under -budget by $834,801. This includes a variance in Fire of $928,133 and in Ambulance of $242,943 due to the timing of vehicle and equipment purchases; the budget will be rolled over to FY2016. A decrease of $366,838 is due to the SAFER grant award used to offset the 64 City of Corpus Christi additional fire academy expenditures. • Streets are under -budget by $668,099. This includes $300,000 because of termination of an infrastructure maintenance contract with Star Operations. A replacement contract was not awarded prior to the end of the fiscal year because there were no bids on the first pass. • Solid Waste is under -budget by $1,056,747. Expenses for contracted landfill groundwater and air monitoring services were lower than budgeted by $98,000. $288,000 of funding for the pilot street sweeping program was not used due to delays in implementation and weather issues. New refuse collection equipment was ordered but not received in FY2015 due to delays in the bid and purchasing process and in manufacturing resulting in $429,000 of lease purchase payments that were budgeted not being spent. Lower energy costs for diesel fuel and electricity, coupled with higher utilization of CNG vehicles, resulted in $247,000 of savings • Parks & Recreation is under -budget by $1,651,190. Salary savings caused Park Operations to be under -budget by $261,849 and Tourist District to be under -budget by $119,818, largely due to difficulties hiring peak season staff because of higher paying jobs available in the area. Budget for a palm tree maintenance agreement and purchases of a truck and mowers will be rolled over to FY2016. The Oso Bay Learning Center was budgeted for full operations to begin during FY2015. However, the building has not been completed, leading to $310,655 under -budget with savings in salaries, building maintenance, furnishings and exhibits. Priority Maintenance was under -budget $114,601 because wet conditions during much of the year caused delays in making purchases for and completing work on projects. Beach Operations was under $121,749 due to salaries and service agreements. Latchkey Operations was under $124,258 due to reduced enrollment in the program. Park Construction was under $168,375 because fewer playground replacements were completed due to rainy weather. 7. Receivables Street Nonmajor Debt Capital Utility and Other General Service Projects System Aiport Funds Total Unrestricted Accounts $ 5,807,922 $ -- $ $ 28,902,596 $ 52,226 $ 5,917,668 $ 40,680,412 Taxes 3,231,490 1,787,737 -- -- 5,019,227 Intergovernmental 5,000,872 -- 1,104,763 1,555,103 6,692,048 14,352,786 Mortgages and loans -- -- 13,590,749 13,590,749 Property leases 15 188 1,732 1,935 Demolition liens 4,149,465 -- 803,354 4,952,819 Special assessments 749,322 4,777 754,099 Employees 34,493 -- 11,794 1,501 47,788 Miscellaneous 1,655,645 2,775 23,161 13,793 1,695,374 Restricted Accounts 122,652 122,652 Gross receivables 19,879,902 1,790,512 749,322 30,042,502 1,729,981 27,025,622 81,217,841 Less allowance for uncollectible (6,722,424) (914,627) (663,753) (3,626,511) (39,670) (3,626,843) (15,593,828) Net total receivables $ 13,157,478 $ 875,885 $ 85,569 $ 26,415,991 $ 1,690,311 $ 23,398,779 $ 65,624,013 65 City of Corpus Christi 8. Capital Assets A summary of changes in the capital assets follows. In these tables, business -type activities include the enterprise funds' and Solid Waste's capital assets. Beginning Additions Ending Balance and Transfers Retirements Balance Governmental activities Capital assets, not being depreciated Land $ 60,246,631 $ 55,825 $ $ 60,302,456 Construction in Progress 88,829,763 7,112,480 95,942,243 Total capital assets, not being depreciated 149,076,394 7,168,305 156,244,699 Capital assets, being depreciated Buildings 236,216,895 1,310,065 237,526,960 Improvements 191,090,978 3,663,271 -- 194,754,249 Machinery & Equipment 94,647,039 7,022,282 4,973,892 96,695,429 Infrastructure 335,784,335 13,189,555 -- 348,973,890 Total capital assets, being depreciated 857,739,247 25,185,173 4,973,892 877,950,528 Less accumulated depreciation for: Buildings 89,735,310 5,798,158 95,533,468 Improvements 99,766,061 6,368,896 -- 106,134,957 Machinery & Equipment 71,234,884 7,427,937 4,837,992 73,824,829 Infrastructure 154,164,944 5,485,545 -- 159,650,489 Total accumulated depreciation 414,901,199 25,080,536 4,837,992 435,143,743 Total capital assets, being depreciated, net 442,838,048 104,637 135,900 442,806,785 Governmental activities capital assets, net $ 591,914,442 $ 7,272,942 $ 135,900 $ 599,051,484 City of Corpus Christi Beginning Additions Balance and Transfers Retirements Ending Balance Business -type activities Capital assets, not being depreciated Land $ 36,556,116 $ -- $ $ 36,556,116 Construction in progress 264,435,940 98,557,719 362,993,659 Total capital assets, not being depreciated 300,992,056 98,557,719 399,549,775 Capital assets, being depreciated Water rights 212,284,487 -- 1,574,240 210,710,247 Buildings 94,808,686 1,517,174 -- 96,325,860 Improvements 417,278,680 3,954,418 -- 421,233,098 Machinery and equipment 66,149,634 6,791,809 1,177,990 71,763,453 Infrastructure 1,103,444,216 12,407,918 57,900 1,115,794,234 Total capital assets, being depreciated 1,893,965,703 24,671,319 2,810,130 1,915,826,892 Less: accumulated depreciation for Water rights 16,098,702 2,025,373 18,124,075 Buildings 38,056,000 2,257,903 40,313,903 Improvements 168,608,189 17,086,995 -- 185,695,184 Machinery and equipment 47,208,623 5,395,726 1,177,991 51,426,358 Infrastructure 321,409,387 19,767,476 51,734 341,125,129 Total accumulated depreciation 591,380,901 46,533,473 1,229,725 636,684,649 Total capital assets, being depreciated, net Business -type activities capital assets, net 1,302,584,802 (21,862,154) 1,580,405 1,279,142,243 $ 1,603,576,858 $ 76,695,565 $ 1,580,405 $ 1,678,692,018 Discretely presented component units Activity for the Convention and Visitors Bureau for the year ended September 30, 2015, was as follows: Beginning Additions Balance and Transfers Retirements Ending Balance Capital assets, being depreciated Buildings $ 63,059 $ -- $ -- $ 63,059 Machinery and equipment 204,768 143,695 38,930 309,533 Total capital assets, being depreciated 267,827 143,695 38,930 372,592 Less accumulated depreciation for Buildings 2,895 6,646 -- 9,541 Machinery and equipment 65,365 56,193 38,930 82,628 Total accumulated depreciation 68,260 62,839 38,930 92,169 Total capital assets, being depreciated, net 199,567 80,856 280,423 Convention and Visitor's Bureau capital assets, net $ 199,567 $ 80,856 $ $ 280,423 67 City of Corpus Christi Depreciation expense and amortization of water rights is charged to functions as follows: Governmental activity Business -type activity General government $ 925,865 Gas $ 2,683,368 Police 1,564,141 Water 21,701,880 Fire 1,211,405 Wastewater 11,635,386 Emergency management 4,447 Airport 5,159,587 Inspections 6,638 Golf centers 73,100 Streets 5,859,426 Marina 540,454 Health 207,179 Solid waste 4,739,698 Parks and recreation 2,592,366 Total $ 46,533,473 Libraries 389,513 Museums 223,795 Community enrichment 3,462,065 Community development 2,957,204 Convention and visitors facilities 1,521,462 Internal service fund 4,155,030 Total $ 25,080,536 9. Employment Retirement Benefits A. Plan Descriptions The City participates in funding two retirement plans as follows: (1) all City employees, except firefighters participate in the Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) and (2) firefighters participate in the Corpus Christi Fire Fighters Retirement System (FFRS). The City participates as one of 860 plans in the nontraditional, joint contributory, hybrid defined benefit plan administered by TMRS. TMRS is an agency created by the State of Texas and administered in accordance with the TMRS Act, Subtitle G, Title 8, Texas Government Code (the TMRS Act) as an agent multiple -employer retirement system for municipal employees in the State of Texas. The TMRS Act places the general administration and management of the System with a six -member Board of Trustees. Although the Governor, with the advice and consent of the Senate, appoints the Board, TMRS is not fiscally dependent on the State of Texas. TMRS's defined benefit pension plan is a tax -qualified plan under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. TMRS issues a publicly available comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR) that can be obtained at www.tmrs.com. The City contributes to the FFRS for firefighters in the Corpus Christi Fire Department. FFRS is a single employer, contributory, defined benefit plan. The benefit provisions are authorized by the Texas Local Fire Fighters' Retirement Act (TLFFRA). TLFFRA provides the authority and procedure to amend benefit provisions. The plan is administered by the Board of Trustees of the Corpus Christi Fire Fighters' Retirement System. The City does not have access to nor can it utilize assets within the retirement plantrust. FFRS issues a stand-alone report pursuant to GASB Statement No. 67, which may be obtained by writing the Corpus Christi Fire Fighters' Retirement System at 711 N. Carancahua, Suite 724, Corpus Christi, Texas 78475. B. Benefits Provided TMRS provides retirement benefits to all City employees except firefighters. Benefit provisions are adopted by the governing body of the city, within the options available in the state statutes governing TMRS. At retirement, the benefit is calculated as if the sum of the employee's contributions, with interest, and the city - financed monetary credits with interest were used to purchase an annuity. Members may choose to receive their retirement benefit in one of seven payments options. Members may also choose to receive a portion of their 68 City of Corpus Christi benefit as a Partial Lump Sum Distribution in an amount equal to 12, 24, or 36 monthly payments, which cannot exceed 75% of the member's deposits and interest. The City grants a monetary credit referred to as Updated Service Credit. This monetary credit is determined by hypothetically re -computing the member's account balance by assuming that the current member deposit rate of the employing city has always been in effect. The computation also assumes that the member's salary has always been the member's average salary using a salary calculation based on the 36-monthperiod ending a year before the effective date of calculation. This hypothetical account balance is increased by 3% each year (not the actual interest credited to the member's account in previous years), and increased by the city match currently in effect. The resulting sum is then compared to the member's actual account balance increased by the actual city match and actual interest credited. If the hypothetical calculation exceeds the actual calculation, the member is granted a monetary credit (or Updated Service Credit) equal to the difference between the hypothetical calculation and the actual calculation times the percentage adopted. The City increases the annuities of its retirees, effective January 1 of a calendar year, at a rate equal to 70% of the increase in the Consumer Price index — all Urban Consumers (CPI -U) between the December preceding the member's retirement date and the December one year before the effective date of the increase, minus any previously granted increases. Members can retire at age 60 and above with 5 or more years of service or with 20 years of service regardless of age. Members are vested after 5 years. FFRS provides benefits to firefighters in the Corpus Christi Fire Department. The benefits are fully vested after 20 years of credited service. Firefighters may retire at age 54 with 20 years of service. A partially vested benefit is provided for firefighters who terminate employment with at least 10 but less than 20 years of service. If a terminated firefighter has a partially vested benefit, he may retire starting on the date he would have both completed 20 years of service if he had remained a Corpus Christi firefighter and attained age 54. Effective June 1, 2015, the plan provided a monthly normal service retirement benefit, payable in a Joint and 100% to Spouse form of annuity, equal to the greater of (1) 50.8% of Highest 60 -Month Average Pay plus $150.00 per month for each year of service in excess of 20 years and (2) $137.00 per month for each year of service. A retiring firefighter who is at least age 54 with at least 20 years of service has the option to elect the Retroactive Deferred Retirement Option Plan (RETRO DROP) which will provide a lump sum benefit and a reduced monthly benefit. The reduced monthly benefit is based on the service and Highest 60 -Month Average Pay as if he had terminated employment on his selected RETRO DROP benefit calculation date, which is no earlier than the later of the date he meets the age 54 and 20 years of service requirements and the date three years prior to the date he actually retires. Upon retirement, the member will receive, in addition to his monthly retirement benefit, a lump sum equal to the sum of (1) the amount of monthly contributions the member has made to the System after the RETRO DROP benefit calculation date plus (2) the total of the monthly retirement benefits the member would have received between the RETRO DROP benefit calculation date and the date he retired under the plan. There are no account balances. The lump sum is calculated at the time of retirement and distributed as soon as administratively possible. There is no provision for automatic postretirement benefit increases. The System has the authority to provide, and has periodically in the past provided, ad hoc postretirement benefit increases. Membership in the Plans City Fire Employees Fighters Total Retirees and beneficiaries currently receiving benefits 2,789 297 3,086 Inactive employees entitled to but not yet receiving benefits 776 13 789 Current contributing employees 2,245 408 2,653 Total 5,810 718 6,528 69 City of Corpus Christi C. Contributions TMRS - Contribution rates for employees in TMRS are either 5%, 6%, or 7% of employee gross earnings, and the city matching percentages are either 100%, 150%, or 200%, both as adopted by the governing body of the city. Under the state law governing TMRS, the contribution rate for each city is determined annually by the actuary, using the Entry Age Normal (EAN) actuarial cost method. The actuarially determined rate is the estimated amount necessary to finance the cost of benefits earned by employees during the year, with an additional amount to finance any unfunded accrued liability. Employees for the City of Corpus Christi were required to contribute 6% of their annual gross earnings during the fiscal year. The City's contributions to TMRS for the year ended September 30, 2015, of $18,964,205 did not equal the required contributions of $24,928,854. FFRS - The contribution provisions of the System are authorized by TLFFRA. TLFFRA provides the authority and procedure to change the amount of contributions determined as a percentage of pay by each firefighter and a percentage of payroll by the city. Firefighters for the City of Corpus Christi were required to contribute 13.1% of their annual gross earnings during the fiscal year. The City's contributions to FFRS for the year ended September 30, 2015, were $6,266,444, which equaled the required contributions. Contribution rates for employees and for the City during the fiscal year were as follows: Texas Municipal Fire Fighters Retirement System Retirement System Authority establishing contribution obligation State Legislation State Legislation Frequency of contribution Biweekly Biweekly Employee's contribution (percent of earnings) October 1, 2014 - May 31, 2015 6.00% 12.20% June 1, 2015 - September 30, 2015 6.00% 13.10% City's contribution (percent of earnings) October 1, 2014 - January 1, 2015 15.46% 20.78% January 2, 2015 - September 30, 2015 16.46% 20.78% City's contribution October 1, 2014 - September 30, 2015 $18,964,205 $6,266,444 D. Net Pension Liabilities The City's net pension liabilities for both plans were measured as of December 31, 2014, and the Total Pension Liabilities (TPL) used to calculate the Net Pension Liabilities were determined by actuarial valuations as of that date. Actuarial Assumptions The Total Pension Liabilities in the December 31, 2014, actuarial valuations were determined using the following actuarial assumptions: 70 City of Corpus Christi Inflation rate Overall payroll growth Investment rate of return City Employees Fire Fighters 3% 3.75% 3% 3.75% 7%, net of pension plan 7.9%, net of pension plan investment expense, including investment expense, including inflation inflation TMRS - salary increases were based on a service -related table. Mortality rates for active members, retirees, and beneficiaries were based on the gender -distinct RP2000 Combined Healthy Mortality Table, with male rates multiplied by 109% and female rates multiplied by 103%. The rates are projected on a fully generational basis by scale BB to account for future mortality improvements. For disabled annuitants, the gender -distinct RP2000 Disabled Retiree Mortality Table is used, with slight adjustments. Actuarial assumptions used in the December 31, 2014, valuation were based on the results of actuarial experience studies. The experience study in TMRS was for the period January 1, 2006, through December, 31, 2009, first used in the December 31, 2010, valuation. Healthy post-retirement mortality rates and annuity purchase rates were updated based on a Mortality Experience Investigation Study covering 2009 through 2011, and dated December 31, 2013. These assumptions were first used in the December 31, 2013, valuation, along with a change to the Entry Age Normal (EAN) actuarial cost method. Assumptions are reviewed annually No additional changes were made for the 2014 valuation. The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments is 7.0%. The pension plan's policy in regard to the allocation of invested assets is established and may be amended by the TMRS Board of Trustees. Plan assets are managed on a total return basis with an emphasis on both capital appreciation as well as the production of income, in order to satisfy the short-term and long-term funding needs of TMRS. The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a building-block method in which best estimate ranges of expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of pension plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce the long-term expected rate of return by weighting the expected future real rates of return by the target asset allocation percentage and by adding expected inflation. The target allocation and best estimates of arithmetic real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table: Asset Class Target Allocation Domestic equity 17.5% International equity 17.5% Core fixed income 30.0% Non-core fixed income 10.0% Real return 5.0% Real estate 10.0% Absolute return 5.0% Private equity 5.0% Total 100.0% Long -Term Expected Real Rate of Return (Arithmetic) 4.80% 6.05% 1.50% 3.50% 1.75% 5.25% 4.25% 8.50% FFRS — Mortality rates were based on the gender -distinct RP2000 Combined Healthy Mortality Table for males and for females projected to 2024 by scale AA. The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments is reviewed for each biennial actuarial valuation and was determined using a building-block method in which expected future net real rates of return (expected returns, net of pension plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset 71 City of Corpus Christi class. These components are combined to produce the long-term expected rate of return by weighting the expected future net real rates of return by the target asset allocation percentage (currently resulting in 4.24%) and by adding expected inflation (3.75%). In addition, the final 7.90% assumption was selected by "rounding down" and thereby reflects a reduction of 0.09% for adverse deviation. The target allocation and expected arithmetic net real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table: Asset Class Target Allocation Long -Term Expected Real Rate of Return (Arithmetic) Equities Large cap domestic 25.0% 5.77% Small/mid cap domestic 10.0% 6.07% International developed 12.5% 6.12% Emerging markets 6.0% 7.29% Real estate 10.0% 3.90% Fixed income 36.5% 1.64% Cash 0% 0.40% Total 100.0% Discount Rate TMRS - The discount rate used to measure the Total Pension Liability was 7.0%. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate were based on the City's present funding rates. Based on that assumption, the pension plan's fiduciary Net Position was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current active and inactive employees. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the Total Pension Liability. FFRS - The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 7.9%. No projection of cash flows was used to determine the discount rate because the December 31, 2014 actuarial valuation showed that expected contributions would pay the normal cost and amortize the unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) in 23 years. That UAAL was based on an actuarial value of assets that was $4.5 million less than the plan fiduciary net position as of December 31, 2014. Because of the 23 -year amortization period of the UAAL with the lower value of assets, the pension plan's fiduciary net position is expected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current active and inactive members. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments of 7.9% was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments as the discount rate to determine the total pension liability. Sensitivity of the net pension liabilities to changes in the discount rate The following presents the net pension liabilities of the City, calculated using the discount rates used in the actuarial valuation, as well as what the City's net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1 -percentage -point lower or 1 -percentage -point higher than the current rate: 1% Decrease in the 1% Increase in the Discount Rate Discount Rate Discount Rate City's net pension liability (TMRS) (6.0%) $287,351,051 (7.0%) $179,740,443 (8.0%) $90,830,826 City's net pension liability (FFRS) (6.9%) $96,794,664 (7.9%) $74,975,183 (8.9%) $56,346,670 Total net pension liability $384,145,715 $254,715,626 $147,177,496 72 City of Corpus Christi Pension Plans Fiduciary Net Positions TMRS — Detailed information about the TMRS pension plans' Fiduciary Net Position is available in a separately issued TMRS financial report. That report may be obtained on the Internet at www.tmrs.com. FFRS - FFRS issues a stand-alone report pursuant to GASB Statement No. 67, which may be obtained by writing the Corpus Christi Fire Fighters' Retirement System at 711 N. Carancahua, Suite 724, Corpus Christi, Texas 78475. See that report for all information about the plan fiduciary net position. Changes in the Net Pension Liabilities TMRS Balance at 12/31/2013 Changes for the year: Service cost Interest Difference between expected and actual experience Contributions -employer Contributions -employee Net investment income Benefit payments, including refunds of employee contributions Administrative expense Other changes Net changes Balance at 12/31/2014 Total Pension Liability Increase (Decrease) Plan Fiduciary Net Net Pension Position Liability (a) (b) (a) -(b) $ 796,904,133 $ 621,013,854 $ 175,890,279 14,552,695 54,768,864 (5,660,997) - 17,786,102 6,905,864 35,519,832 (43,536,263) (43,536,263) (370,905) (30,495) 14,552,695 54,768,864 (5,660,997) (17,786,102) (6,905,864) (35,519,832) 370,905 30,495 20,124,299 16,274,135 3,850,164 $ 817,028,432 $ 637,287,989 $ 179,740,443 City of Corpus Christi FFRS Increase (Decrease) Total Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Net Pension Liability Position Liability (a) (b) (a) -(b) Balance at 12/31/2013 $ 197,293,990 $ 126,159,233 $ 71,134,757 Changes for the year: Service cost 4,144,217 4,144,217 Interest 15,650,548 - 15,650,548 Contributions -employer 6,007,048 (6,007,048) Contributions -employee 3,526,756 (3,526,756) Net investment income 6,949,478 (6,949,478) Benefit payments, including refunds of employee contributions (11,612,717) (11,612,717) Administrative expense - (215,377) 215,377 Assumption changes 313,566 313,566 Net changes 8,495,614 4,655,188 3,840,426 Balance at 12/31/2014 $ 205,789,604 $ 130,814,421 $ 74,975,183 E. Pension Expense and Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions For the year ended September 30, 2015, the city recognized pension expense of $26,624,313. Components of Pension Expense TMRS FFRS Total Service cost 14,552,695 4,144,217 18,696,912 Interest 54,768,864 15,650,548 70,419,412 Employee contributions (6,905,864) (3,526,756) (10,432,620) Projected earnings on plan investments (43,470,970) (10,000,967) (53,471,937) Amortization of Deferred Outflows - Liabilities Amortization of Deferred Inflows — Assets (1,443,064) - (1,443,064) 1,590,228 648,603 2,238,831 Administrative expense 370,905 215,379 586,284 Other changes in Fiduciary Net Position 30,495 - 30,495 Total pension expense 19,493,289 7,131,024 26,624,313 City of Corpus Christi At September 30, 2015, the city reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources: TMRS FFRS Total Deferred Deferred Deferred Deferred Deferred Deferred Outflows of Inflows of Outflows of Inflows of Outflows of Inflows of Resources Resources Resources Resources Resources Resources Differences between expected and actual experience $ - $ (4,217,931) $ - $ - $ $ (4,217,931) Changes of assumptions Differences between projected and actual investment earnings 6,360,910 - 275,261 - 275,261 - - 2,441,191 - 8,802,101 - Contributions subsequent to the measurement date 14,843,958 - 4,615,795 - 19,459,753 - Total $ 21,204,868 $ (4,217,931) $ 7,332,247 $ - $28,537,115 $ (4,217,931) The total of the contributions by the City to the Systems contributed subsequent to the measurement date of the net pension liabilities, December 31, 2014, through September 30, 2015, is a deferred outflow of resources that will be recognized as a reduction in the net pension liabilities in the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016. These amounts are $14,843,958 (TMRS) and $4,615,795 (FFRS) fora total of $19,459,753. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows: Year ended Sept. 30: TMRS FFRS Total 2016 $ 147,164 $ 648,603 $ 795,767 2017 147,164 648,603 795,767 2018 258,423 648,603 907,026 2019 1,590,228 648,602 2,238,830 2020 - 38,305 38,305 Thereafter 83,736 83,736 Total $ 2,142,979 $ 2,716,452 $ 4,859,431 F. Deferred Compensation Plan The City maintains responsibility for reviewing and approving emergency withdrawals from the Internal Revenue Code, Section 457, Deferred Compensation Plans. The assets of the Plans are reported in a pension trust fund. 75 City of Corpus Christi 10. Post -Employment Health Care Benefits GASB Statement No. 45: Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Postemployment Benefits Other than Pensions (OPEB), establishes accounting standards for postretirement benefits. The standard does not require funding of OPEB expense, but any difference between the annual required contribution (ARC) and the amount funded during the year is required to be recorded in the employer's financial statement as an increase (or decrease) in the net OPEB obligation. The City is required to obtain an actuarial valuation at least once every two years in accordance with GASB 45 standards The City's latest valuation is dated as of August 1, 2013, and discloses the following: Plan Description and Funding Policy Employees who retire from the City of Corpus Christi, and eligible dependents and survivors, are eligible to continue to participate in the City's health insurance programs at the "blended" employee group rate which is determined annually by the City of Corpus Christi and approved by the City Council. Retirees have 31 days to elect to enroll in the City's self-funded, single -employer health insurance plan (Citicare, Citicare Public Safety, and Citicare-Fire) in which they were participating at the time of retirement unless otherwise stated in a plan document or collective bargaining agreement. In an effort to reduce the City's liability, retirees who are Medicare -eligible have been enrolled in a separate Medicare insurance plan and are no longer covered by the City's group insurance plan. As of August 1, 2013, a total of 202 eligible retirees and dependents were participating in the City's group health program detailed as follows: Citicare and Citicare Premium Citicare Public Safety Citicare Fire Pending election 74 65 63 Total 202 The plan is funded on a pay-as-you-go basis and incurred $2,676,391 in claims and other costs in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. The funds to pay these claims and other costs are derived in part from retiree premiums, which do not fully cover the costs. The plan is not accounted for as a trust fund because an irrevocable trust has not been established to fund the plan. The plan does not issue a separate financial report. Annual OPEB Cost and Net OPEB Obligation The City's annual other post -employment benefit (OPEB) cost is calculated based on the annual required contribution (ARC) of the employer, an amount actuarially determined in accordance with the parameters of GASB Statement 45. The ARC represents a level of funding that, if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal costs each year and to amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities over a period not to exceed 30 years. The City's annual OPEB cost for each plan for the current year is as follows: Annual required contribution Interest on net OPEB obligation ARC adjustment Annual OPEB cost Contributions made (pay-as-you-go basis) Increase (Decrease) in net OPEB obligation Net OPEB obligation - beginning of year Net OPEB obligation - end of year Citicare Citicare Public Safety $ 350,162 270,227 (309,637) Citicare Fire Total $ 296,175 $ 229,235 $ 875,572 70,662 126,518 467,407 (80,968) (144,970) (535,575) 310,752 81,227 229,525 6,928,893 $ 7,158,418 76 285,869 210,783 807,404 283,301 646,926 1,011,454 2,568 (436,143) (204,050) 1,811,850 3,244,049 11,984,792 $ 1,814,418 $ 2,807,906 $ 11,780,742 City of Corpus Christi Three year trend information is as follows: City's Annual OPEB Cost (APC) 2013 2014 (14 months) 2015 Percentage of APC contributed 2013 2014 (14 months) 2015 Net OPEB Obligation 2013 2014 2015 Citicare Public Safety Fire Total $57,207 $304,160 $310,751 -139.8% 38.6% 26.1% $283,049 $282,758 $285,869 157.5% 154.7% 99.1% $338,862 $209,501 $210,783 105.9% -68.0% 306.9% $ 6,742,042 $ 1,966,411 $ 2,892,192 $ 6,928,893 $ 1,811,850 $ 3,244,049 $ 7,158,418 $ 1,814,418 $ 2,807,906 Funded Status and Funding Progress The funded status of the plan as of the last valuation date of August 1, 2013, was as follows: Actuarial accrued liability Actuarial value of plan assets Unfunded actuarial accrued liability Citicare Citicare Public Safety Citicare Fire $679,118 $796,419 $807,403 N/A N/A N/A $ 11,600,645 $ 11,984,792 $ 11,780,742 Total $ 3,800,918 $ 4,461,663 $ 3,558,944 $ 11,821,525 $ 3,800,918 $ 4,461,663 $ 3,558,944 $ 11,821,525 Funded ratio 0% 0% 0% 0% Covered payroll $ 60,938,657 $ 28,335,830 $ 23,486,591 $ 112,761,078 Unfunded actuarial accrued liability as a percentage of covered payroll 6.2% 15.7% 15.2% 10.5% Actuarial valuations involve estimates of the value of reported amounts and assumptions about the probability of events in the future. Amounts determined regarding the status of the plan and the annual required contributions of the City are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared to past expectations and new estimates are made about the future. The schedule of funding progress, presented as required supplementary information following the notes to the financial statements, presents multiyear trend information that shows whether the actuarial value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liabilities for benefits. Plan Changes The total GASB 45 actuarial accrued liability for Citicare, Public Safety and Fire decreased from approximately $12.7 million as of August 1, 2011, to approximately $11.8 million as of August 1, 2013. The reduction is due to a combination of changes in assumptions and differences between prior assumptions and actual experience. Differences causing a reduction in the liability include a 27% reduction in number of retirees participating in the plan, reduced health care cost trends, and reduced child per retiree assumptions. These were offset by a change in retiree contribution assumptions because the City is not increasing retiree premiums in FY2015 as was previously assumed. 77 City of Corpus Christi Actuarial Methods and Assumptions Projections of benefits are based on the substantive plan and include the type of benefits in force at the valuation date and the pattern of sharing benefits between the City and the plan members at that point. Actuarial calculations reflect a long term perspective and employ methods and assumptions that are designed to reduce the short term volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value of assets. Significant methods and assumptions used for this valuation are as follows: Measurement Date August 1, 2013 Actuarial Cost Method Entry Age Amortization Period 30 years, Open Amortization Method Level Percent of Payroll Discount rate 3.90% CPI 2.50% Healthcare Cost Trend Rate 2.5% initial rate, 2.3% ultimate rate, 46 year grade -in period Payroll Growth Rate 2% annually 11. Risk Management The City operates a risk management program for workers' compensation claims, liability claims and property insurance. In addition, the City operates an employee benefits program which includes life and health insurance. A. Insurance The City self -funds workers' compensation, general/auto liabilities and health benefits. Purchased insurance coverage includes: Commercial property insurance with a $250 million limit on all perils and a $150 million limit on named storm, $75 million in airport liability, $10 million of excess gas utility liability insurance, $10 million aggregate of excess general liability insurance and statutory excess workers' compensation coverage. Primary flood coverage provides up to $500,000 on specified buildings. All funds of the City participate in the program and make payments to the Liability and Employee Benefits Fund based on an annual actuarial analysis. In addition, the City of Corpus Christi provides comprehensive health coverage to employees, dependents and retirees. Coverage becomes effective the first day of employment and the plan has no lifetime limit The estimated claims liability of $14,742,402 at September 30, 2015, of which $7,752,096 is due within one year, is based on requirements of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 10, which requires that a liability for claims be reported if information prior to the issuance of the financial statements indicates that it is probable that a liability has been incurred at the date of the financial statements and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Changes in the fund claims liability amounts for fiscal years 2014 and 2015 were: Fiscal Year 2013-2014 (14 months) 2014-2015 Current Year Beginning of Claims and Balance at Fiscal Year Changes in Claim Fiscal Liability Estimates Payments Year End $ 12,281,158 $ 28,767,974 $ (30,114,513) $ 10,934,619 $ 10,934,619 $ 30,157,544 $ (26,349,761) $ 14,742,402 78 City of Corpus Christi B. Contingent Liabilities The City is a defendant in various tort claims and lawsuits involving general liability, automobile liability, civil rights actions, employment and various contractual matters. In the opinion of the City's management and counsel, the outcome of the pending litigation will not have a material effect on the City's financial position or operation. 12. Operating Leases A. Property Leased From Others The City leases various office space sites and equipment under operating leases. Most of the leases are cancellable and extendable on a monthly basis. B. Property Leased To Others The City is the lessor of airport floor space, real property, and parking spaces under operating leases expiring through the fiscal year 2026. The arena operating leases expire through the fiscal year 2017 Minimum rentals to be received from future leases are: Fiscal Year Ending September 30, Special Enterprise Revenue Funds Funds 2016 $ 3,661,544 $ 108,400 2017 3,665,031 76,400 2018 2,342,409 -- 2019 931,250 2020 667,133 2021-2026 1,445,787 Total minimum future rentals $ 12,713,154 $ 184,800 Minimum future rentals do not include contingent rentals that may be received if the lessee meets certain performance clauses under the leases. 79 City of Corpus Christi 13. Long-term obligations The following is a summary of long-term obligation transactions of the City for the year ended September 30, 2015: Governmental activities Long-term debt General obligation bonds Certificates of obligation Revenue bonds Discount on bonds payable Premium on bonds payable Capital leases Other notes payable Total long-term debt Accumulated compensated absences Net Pension Liability Net OPEB obligation Governmental activities Long-term liabilities Beginning Balance Additions 323,830,000 $ 90,520,000 10,987,725 -- 71,725,000 (32,341) -- 17,759,148 9,751,466 6,319,117 1,512,283 24,405,000 2,137,698 454,993,649 103,921,447 38,563,243 3,238,559 197,653,236 48,152,131 11,244,554 (1,304,471) $ 702,454,682 $ 154,007,666 Business -type activities Long-term debt General obligation bonds $ 66,185,000 $ Certificates of obligation 17,017,275 Priority Revenue bonds 416,345,000 Junior Lien Revenue bonds 306,290,000 Discount on bonds payable (888,820) Premium on bonds payable 35,118,454 Capital leases 9,278,830 Utility notes payable 144,435,976 Total long-term debt Landfill closure cost Accumulated compensated absences Net Pension Liability Net OPEB Obligation Business -type activities Long-term liabilities $ 1,073,648,324 993,781,715 26,307,808 3,446,762 49,371,800 740,239 Reductions Ending Balance Due Within One Year $ (19,170,000) $ 395,180,000 $ 20,800,000 (1,955,154) 9,032,571 450,000 (6,620,000) 65,105,000 6,920,000 10,831 (21,510) -- (3,384,428) 24,126,186 -- (2,030,159) 5,801,241 1,768,231 (3,665,189) 22,877,509 2,591,489 (36,814,099) 522,100,997 32,529,720 (7,372,690) 34,429,112 7,372,691 (41,540,936) 204,264,431 -- 1,001,937 10,942,020 (84,725,788) $ 771,736,560 $ 39,902,411 $ (1,970,000) $ 64,215,000 $ 1,920,000 -- (4,504,846) 12,512,429 1,115,000 65,385,000 (145,310,000) 336,420,000 24,130,000 291,560,000 (10,015,000) 587,835,000 12,595,000 -- 33,313 (855,507) -- 35,855,195 (8,091,441) 62,882,208 -- 4,527,578 (3,800,126) 10,006,282 3,236,581 2,952,302 (6,102,828) 141,285,450 4,953,303 400,280,075 (179,760,928) 1,214,300,862 47,949,884 2,067,323 (200,387) 28,174,744 756,722 2,097,273 (1,894,542) 3,649,493 1,894,542 14,507,441 (13,428,046) 50,451,195 -- 88,966 9,517 838,722 $ 419,041,078 $ (195,274,386) $ 1,297,415,016 $ 50,601,148 In the schedule above, business -type activities include the enterprise funds' and Solid Waste's long-term obligations. In the governmental funds, the OPEB obligation will be liquidated by the General Fund (84%), Special Revenue funds (8%), and Internal Service funds (8%) based on the allocation of the cost of self-insurance for health benefits. General Fund will typically liquidate 86% and Special Revenue and Internal Service funds will liquidate 14% of the pension liability. In Fiscal Year 2015 the City of Corpus Christi implemented GASB Statement 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions and the beginning liabilities related to pensions were restated. The changes due to implementation are explained in Note 1-P. 80 City of Corpus Christi A. Bonds Bonds payable at September 30, 2015, are comprised of the following: Governmental activities General Obligation Bonds $3,830,000 2007 Texas Military Value Revolving Loan Program Bonds due in annual installments of $180,000 to $310,000 through September 1, 2026, interest at 3.75% to 4.00% $2,290,000 $31,145,000 2007-A General Improvement due in annual installments of $1,355,000 to $2,350,000 through March 1, 2027, interest at 4.00% to 5.00% 22,385,000 $88,725,000 2009 General Improvement Bonds due in annual installments of $3,370,000 to $6,495,000 through July 31, 2029, interest at 3.00% to 5.00% 68,385,000 $13,685,000 2010 General Improvement Bonds due in annual installments of $525,000 to $950,000 through July 31, 2030, interest at 2.75% to 4.25% 10,995,000 $44,695,000 2012 General Improvement Bonds due in annual installments of $500,000 to $3,610,000 through March 1, 2032, interest at 2.00% to 5.00% 43,195,000 91.36% of $29,855,000 2012C General Improvement Refunding bonds due in annual installments of $2,250,000 to $3,530,000 through March 1, 2023, interest at 2.00% to 5.00% 20,520,000 55.86% of $107,660,000 2012D General Improvement Refunding bonds due in annual installments of $545,000 to $6,185,000 through March 1, 2032, interest at .29% to 4.03% 57,865,000 $82,025,000 2013 General Improvement Bonds due in annual installments of $1,500,000 to $6,360,000 through March 1, 2033, interest at 2.00% to 5.00% 79,025,000 $90,520,000 2015 General Improvement Bonds due in annual installments of $2,090,000 to $6,775,000 through March 1, 2035, interest at 2.00% to 5.00% 90,520,000 Total General Obligation Bonds 395,180,000 Certificates of Obligation 34.58% of $6,985,000 2007 Certificate of Obligation, Texas Military Preparedness Commission, due in annual installments of $290,000 to $565,000 through September 1, 2026, $347,571 interest at 4.00% to 4.375% $8,460,000 2009 Combination Tax and Limited Pledge Revenue Certificates of Obligation due in annual installments of $300,000 to $580,000 through July 31, 2029, interest at 4.00% to 6,255,000 5.00% $3,000,000 2010 Combination Tax and Limited Pledge Revenue Certificates of Obligation due in annual installments of $110,000 to $210,000 through July 31, 2030, interest at 3.00% to 2,430,000 4.50% Total Certificates of Obligation 9,032,571 81 City of Corpus Christi Revenue Bonds $13,445,000 2008 North Padre Island Development Corporation Tax Increment Contract Revenue Refunding Bonds due in annual installments of $165,000 to $1,605,000 through September 15, 2022, interest at 4.50% $29,075,000 2012 Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation Sales Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds due in annual installments of $1,720,000 to $2,810,000 through March 1, 2026, interest at 3.00% to 5.00% $30,555,000 2014 Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation Sales Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds due in annual installments of $1,800,000 to $3,290,000 through September 1, 2025, interest at 2.00% to 5.00% $8,770,000 25,565,000 26,675,000 $7,840,000 2014 Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation Sales Tax Revenue Bonds due in annual installments of $1,825,000 to $2,100,000 through September 1, 2017, interest at 2.00% to 5.00% 4,095,000 Total Revenue Bonds 65,105,000 Total Governmental Activities $469,317,571 Business -type activities General Obligation Bonds $8,340,000 2012A General Improvement Airport Refunding Bonds due in annual installments of $350,000 to $915,000 beginning March 1, 2015 and ending March 15, 2023, interest at 2.00% to 3.25% $9,880,000 2012B General Improvement Airport Refunding Bonds due in annual installments of $45,000 to $1,385,000 beginning March 1, 2014 and ending March 1, 2030, interest at 2.00% to 4.00% $6,230,000 9,790,000 8.64% of $29,855,000 2012C General Improvement Refunding bonds due in annual installments of $2,250,000 to $3,375,000 through March 1, 2023, interest at 2.00% to 5.00% 2,430,000 44.14% of $107,660,000 2012D General Improvement Refunding bonds due in annual installments of $545,000 to $9,415,000 through March 1, 2038, interest at .29% to 4.03% 45,765,000 Total General Obligation Bonds 64,215,000 Certificates of Obligation $18,605,000 2006 Combination Tax and Solid Waste Revenue Certificates of Obligation due in annual installments of $425,000 to $465,000 through March 1, 2016, interest at 4.25% 65.42% $6,985,000 2007 Certificate of Obligation, Texas Military Preparedness Commission, due in annual installments of $290,000 to $565,000 through September 1, 2026, interest at 4.00% to 4.375% $12,000,000 2008 Combination Tax and Solid Waste Revenue Certificates of Obligation due in annual installments of $245,000 to $285,000 through March 1, 2018, interest at 3.50% to 4.00% 82 465,000 657,429 825,000 City of Corpus Christi $5,500,000 2010 Combination Tax and Limited Pledge Airport Revenue Certificates of Obligation due in annual installments of $195,000 to $340,000 through March 1, 2024, and $2,025,000 term bond due March 1, 2030, interest at 5.00% to 6.25% 4,740,000 $5,990,000 2012 Combination Tax and Surplus Airport Revenue Certificates of Obligation due in annual installments of $165,000 to $385,000 through March 1, 2037, 5,825,000 interest at 3.12% to 5.00% Total Certificates of Obligation 12,512,429 Priority Revenue Bonds $70,390,000 2005 Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds due in annual installments of $2,200,000 to $10,965,000 through July 15, 2020, interest at 3.00% to 5.25% 48,905,000 $5,160,000 2005 Lavaca-Navidad River Authority Water Supply Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds due in annual installments of $20,000 to $715,000 through July 15, 2017, interest at 3.25% to 4.00% 1,400,000 $84,415,000 2006 Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds due in annual installments of $265,000 to $3,710,000 through July 15, 2026, interest at 4.00% to 5.00% 7,430,000 $96,490,000 2009 Utility System Revenue Improvement Bonds due in annual installments of $1,730,000 to $6,135,000 through July 15, 2039, interest at 2.50% to 5.25% 87,335,000 $8,000,000 2010 Utility System Revenue Bonds due in annual installments of $730,000 to $885,000 beginning July 15, 2020 and ending July 15, 2029, interest at 1.591% to 2.587% 8,000,000 $14,375,000 2010A Utility System Revenue Improvement Bonds due in annual installments of $1,440,000 to $1,835,000 through July 15, 2019, interest at 3.00% to 4.00% 6,925,000 $60,625,000 Taxable Series 2010 Utility System Revenue Improvement Bonds (Direct Subsidy - Build America Bonds) payable as $12,730,000 July 15, 2025 term bond, $12,940,000 July 15, 2030 term bond, and $34,955,000 July 15, 2040 term bond due in mandatory redemptions of $1,945,000 to $4,155,000 July 15, 2020 through July 15, 2040, interest at 5.43% to 6.243% 60,625,000 $52,500,000 2012 Utility System Revenue Bonds due in annual installments of $910,000 to $3,080,000 beginning July 15, 2015 and ending July 15, 2042, interest at 2.00% to 5.00% 50,415,000 $2,600,000 2015 Marina System Revenue Bonds, Taxable due in annual installments of $140,000 to $205,000 beginning March 1, 2016 ending March 1, 2029, interest at 3.00% 2,600,000 $62,785,000 2015 Nueces River Authority Water Supply Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds due in annual installments of $4,220,000 to $6,520,000 through July 15, 2027, interest at 62,785,000 3.00% to 5.00% Total Priority Revenue Bonds 336,420,000 Junior Lien Revenue Bonds $155,660,000 2012A Utility System Junior Lien Revenue and Refunding Bonds due in annual installments of $1,655,000 to $15,355,000 beginning July 15, 2013 and ending July 15, 2042, interest at 2.00% to 5.00% 134,920,000 City of Corpus Christi $69,085,000 2012B Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds due in annual installments of $1,240,000 to $3,935,000 beginning July 15, 2013 and ending July 15, 2042, interest at 2.00% to 5.00% 64,425,000 $97,930,000 2013 Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds due in annual installments of $1,000,000 to $3,635,000 beginning July 15, 2014 ending July 15, 2031, 96,930,000 interest at 3.00% to 5.00% $93,600,000 2015A Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds due in annual installments of $1,515,000 to $5,715,000 beginning July 15, 2016 ending July 15, 2045, interest at 3.00% to 5.00% 93,600,000 $49,585,000 2015B Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds due in annual installments of $8,975,000 to $10,905,000 beginning July 15, 2041 ending July 15, 2045, interest at 2.00% 49,585,000 $101,385,000 2015C Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Improvement Bonds due in annual installments of $1,465,000 to $6,045,000 beginning July 15, 2016 ending July 15, 2045, interest at 3.00% to 5.00% 101,385,000 $46,990,000 2015D Utility System Junior Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds due in annual installments of $3,470,000 to $5,110,000 beginning July 15, 2017 ending July 15, 2026, interest at 3.00% to 5.00% 46,990,000 Total Junior Lien Revenue Bonds 587,835,000 Total Business -type Activities $1,000,982,429 City of Corpus Christi The annual requirements to amortize all bonded debt outstanding as of September 30, 2015, are as follows: Governmental Activities Fiscal General Obligation Bonds Certificates of Obligation Year Principal Interest Principal Interest 2016 $ 20,800,000 $ 16,301,418 $ 450,000 $ 383,751 2017 23,260,000 15,349,270 470,000 363,201 2018 24,145,000 14,587,610 495,000 340,976 2019 25,135,000 13,800,181 515,000 317,051 2020 25,965,000 12,905,733 540,000 293,701 2021-2025 120,880,000 49,025,858 3,217,171 1,102,950 2026-2030 98,860,000 23,662,566 3,345,400 317,986 2031-2035 56,135,000 5,518,456 -- -- Total $ 395,180,000 $ 151,151,092 $ 9,032,571 $ 3,119,616 Governmental Activities Fiscal Revenue Bonds Year Principal Interest 2016 $ 6,920,000 $ 2,866,619 2017 7,270,000 2,563,819 2018 5,420,000 2,245,469 2019 5,775,000 2,011,244 2020 6,165,000 1,726,069 2021-2025 30,745,000 4,123,291 2026 2,810,000 43,906 Total $ 65,105,000 $ 15,580,417 Business -Type Activities Business -Type Activities Fiscal General Obligation Bonds Certificates of Obligation Year Principal Interest Principal Interest 2016 $ 1,920,000 $ 1,992,259 $ 1,115,000 $ 553,513 2017 3,005,000 1,952,421 680,000 513,413 2018 3,055,000 1,893,401 710,000 481,463 2019 3,425,000 1,820,185 450,000 454,888 2020 3,500,000 1,735,106 465,000 434,038 2021-2025 18,030,000 7,139,788 2,972,830 1,816,025 2026-2030 15,700,000 4,582,876 3,749,599 961,076 2031-2035 11,135,000 2,052,931 1,615,000 340,669 2036-2037 4,445,000 190,338 755,000 30,500 Total $ 64,215,000 $ 23,359,305 $ 12,512,429 $ 5,585,585 85 City of Corpus Christi Business -Type Activities Business -Type Activities Fiscal Priority Revenue Bonds Junior Lien Revenue Bonds Year Principal Interest Principal Interest 2016 $ 24,130,000 $ 15,946,161 $ 12,595,000 $ 24,419,402 2017 21,110,000 15,517,583 16,740,000 28,108,518 2018 18,670,000 14,577,045 19,835,000 27,749,856 2019 19,540,000 13,707,708 20,665,000 26,866,656 2020 21,070,000 12,910,157 17,565,000 25,946,306 2021-2025 65,155,000 53,370,237 117,705,000 113,082,432 2026-2030 56,570,000 37,025,726 67,630,000 89,383,432 2031-2035 49,020,000 24,086,551 78,945,000 72,710,738 2036-2040 55,115,000 9,657,209 99,580,000 52,067,307 2041-2042 6,040,000 364,800 136,575,000 21,127,431 Total $ 336,420,000 $ 197,163,177 $ 587,835,000 $ 481,462,078 $10,777,534 is available in the Debt Service Fund to service general obligation bonds. There are a number of limitations and restrictions contained in the various bond indentures. The City is in compliance with all significant limitations and restrictions. The interest subsidy on Build America Bonds (Revenue bonds Taxable Series 2010) is deposited directly with the paying agent and shows as a Contribution from other governmental agencies in the financial statements. The City also may be contingently liable for rebates to the Federal government associated with interest earned on proceeds of tax exempt bonds issued. Based on regulations of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the rebate would not be made until five years from the bond issuance date and may be liquidated through lower interest earnings in future years. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, the City has no arbitrage liability. The City issued $5,090,000 of Corpus Christi Tax Notes, Series 2015, dated March 31, 2015 to refund: $4,410,000 Combination Tax & Utility System Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 2007 and $680,000 General Improvement Bonds, Series 2007. The City will reduce its total debt service payments over the next 12 years by approximately $5,049 and obtain an economic loss (difference between the present values of the debt service payments on the old and new debt) of ($12,570). The City issued $46,990,000 of Utility System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2015, dated July 7, 2015 to refund: $50,570,000 of Utility System Revenue Refunding and Improvement Bonds, Series 2006. The City will reduce its total debt service payments over the next 12 years by approximately $3,812,964 and obtain an economic gain (difference between the present values of the debt service payments on the old and new debt) of $3,943,403. The City issued $62,785,000 of Nueces River Authority Water Supply Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds (City of Corpus Christi Lake Texana Project), Series 2015 dated August 15, 2015 to refund: $70,245,000 of Nueces River Authority Water Supply Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2005. The City will reduce its total debt service payments over the next 12 years and obtain an economic gain (difference between the present values of the debt service payments on the old and new debt) of $9,597,354. The City issued $10,020,000 Combination Tax and Limited Pledge Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Taxable Series 2015 and $61,015,000 General Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 2015, dated October 1, 2015 to be delivered on October 20, 2015. These issuances will refund $16,175,000 of General Improvement Bonds, Series 2007A and $48,765,000 General Improvement Bonds, Series 2009. The City will reduce its total debt service payments over the next 14 years by approximate $4,123,940 and obtain an economic gain (difference between the present values of the debt service payments on the old and new debt) of $4,123,940. 86 City of Corpus Christi B. Capital Leases The City has entered into lease agreements as lessee for the acquisition of the following assets: various trucks and heavy equipment for the Solid Waste Department, Health Department, Street Department, Fire Department, and Utilities; building and improvements for the Emergency Operations Center and Development Services Department; containers for the Solid Waste Department; and computer and connectivity equipment for several City departments. These lease agreements qualify as capital leases for accounting purposes, and, therefore, have been recorded at the present value of the future minimum lease payments as of the date of their inception. The following is a schedule of assets leased under capital leases as of September 30, 2015. Governmental Business -Type Activities Activities Land $ 66,359 $ -- Building 1,260,821 Machinery and equipment 13,368,207 19,537,477 Less accumulated depreciation (8,099,903) (9,237,365) Total $ 6,595,484 $ 10,300,112 The following is a schedule of the future minimum lease payments under these capital leases and the present value of the net minimum lease payments at September 30, 2015: Fiscal Year Governmental Business -Type Activities Activities 2016 $ 1,910,413 $ 3,425,476 2017 1,704,702 2,907,976 2018 1,396,946 2,329,201 2019 732,814 1,464,439 2020 301,155 279,911 2021 100,288 -- Total minimum lease payments 6,146,318 10,407,003 Less amount representing interest 345,077 400,721 Present value of minimum lease payments $ 5,801,241 $ 10,006,282 87 City of Corpus Christi C. Other Notes Payable Other notes payable as of September 30, 2015, are as follows: $7,390,000 2012 Public Property Finance Contractual Obligation - Compass Bank due in installments of $550,000 to $685,000 through March 1, 2024, interest at 2.17% $8,000,000 2014 Tax Notes - American National Bank due in annual installments of $1,075,000 to $1,215,000 through March 1, 2021, interest at 1.54% $9,000,000 2014 Public Property Finance Contractual Obligation - Frost Bank due in installments of $655,000 to $870,000 through March 1, 2026, interest at 2.44% 42% of $5,090,000 2015 Tax Notes - Bank of New York due in annual installments of $560,000 to $2,030,000 through September 1, 2021, interest at 4.281% $ 5,705,000 6,925,000 8,345,000 1,902, 509 Total $ 22,877,509 The annual requirements to amortize the notes outstanding as of September 30, 2015, are as follows: Fiscal Year Governmental Activities Principal Interest 2016 $ 2,591,489 $ 490,437 2017 2,649,888 433,784 2018 2,644,490 376,476 2019 2,671,392 320,262 2020 2,737,691 263,888 2021-2025 8,712,559 517,667 2026-2030 870,000 10,614 Total $ 22,877,509 $ 2,413,128 D. Utility System Notes Payable The Utility System notes payable of $141,285,450 consists of $52,879,460 related to an agreement with the Bureau of Reclamation for water rights and recreational facilities at Choke Canyon Dam, $85,778,499 which represents the present value of an agreement with the Lavaca Navidad River Authority for water rights from Lake Texana, and $2,627,491 which represents 58% of the 2015 Tax Notes for military preparedness projects. Choke Canyon Dam The U.S. Department of the Interior, through the Bureau of Reclamation (the Bureau), constructed a 700,000 acre feet dam on the Frio River, known as the Choke Canyon Dam (the Project). The City and the Nueces River Authority (the Authority) are local sponsors of the Project and entered into an agreement with the Bureau to provide a portion of the funds necessary to construct the dam (cost of water supply rights). The dam site will remain the property of the Bureau although the City and Authority have the right, in perpetuity, to impound 80% and 20% respectively, of the water in the Project's reservoir. Pursuant to a separate agreement between the City and the Authority, the City, in exchange for certain services, will pay the Authority $100,000 per calendar year plus additional sums for water used as specified in the agreement. The Bureau also constructed recreation and fish and wildlife facilities. At September 30, 2015, the City's share of the liability of the reservoir and related facilities, excluding interest, totaled $52,879,460 and is payable over a 30 year period at an interest rate of 5.116%. 88 City of Corpus Christi All costs are recorded as Water Supply Rights and Choke Canyon construction and related facilities in the Utility System. The City is responsible for the care, operation, and maintenance of the Project which must be carried out in compliance with the applicable government requirements. Lake Texana Water Rights The City entered into an agreement with the Lavaca Navidad River Authority to acquire the rights to purchase water from Lake Texana for a period of forty-two years. The purchase price is based on a formula which includes a percentage of the operating and maintenance expenses of Lake Texana and a percentage of the principal and interest on the bonds associated with the construction of the reservoir. The City has recorded on its books a liability in the amount of $85,778,499 for the present value of the payments associated with the contract. The annual requirements to amortize the notes outstanding as of September 30, 2015, are as follows: Fiscal Year Business -Type Activities Principal Interest 2016 $ 4,953,303 $ 5,865,081 2017 5,241,672 5,650,471 2018 5,454,697 5,424,729 2019 5,723,418 5,189,719 2020 6,044,728 4,943,345 2021-2025 35,394,782 20,427,212 2026-2030 39,606,850 12,221,148 2031-2035 33,148,984 5,224,587 2036-2040 2,965,572 1,174,098 2041-2044 2,751,444 344,835 Total $ 141,285,450 $ 66,465,225 E. Closure and Post -closure Care Costs State and Federal laws and regulations require the City to place a final cover on its landfill when closed and perform certain maintenance and monitoring functions at the landfill site for thirty years after closure. In addition to operating expenses related to current activities of the landfills, an accrued liability has been recognized based on the future closure and post -closure care costs that will be incurred near or after the date the landfills no longer accept waste. The estimated remaining total current cost of the landfill closure and post -closure care is based on the amount that would be paid if all equipment, facilities, and services required to close, monitor, and maintain the landfills were acquired as of September, 30, 2015, and is assigned to periods based on cumulative landfill use. The City ceased accepting waste for disposal at the J.C. Elliott Landfill on November 10, 2007, and began full-time waste operations at Cefe Valenzuela Landfill. The estimated liability for landfill closure and post -closure costs recorded in the business -type activities at September, 30, 2015, is $28,174,744 for both the J.C. Elliott Landfill and the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill. The current portion of this amount is $756,722, the majority of which is related to the costs for gas and water monitoring, site inspection and record-keeping for J.C. Elliott Landfill. The closure and post -closure costs that have not been recognized in these financial statements is $258,593. The actual costs of closure and post - closure care may be higher due to inflation, changes in technology, or changes in landfill laws and regulations. As of September 30, 2015, Cefe Valenzuela Landfill was at 97.81% filled capacity for developed cells and 4.95% filled capacity for the entire permitted site, with an estimated remaining life as currently permitted between 71 and 95 years. 89 City of Corpus Christi 14. Advance Refundings and Defeasances In prior years, the City refinanced other bond issues through the issuance of refunding bonds. The proceeds from the refunding bonds have been deposited in irrevocable trusts which, together with interest earnings on those deposits, will provide amounts sufficient for future redemption or payment of principal and interest of the issues refunded. The trust account assets and liabilities for the defeased bonds are not included in the City's financial statements. On September 30, 2015, $301,215,000 of bonds outstanding were considered defeased. 15. Interfund Transfers, Receivables and Payables Interfund transfers for the year ended September 30, 2015, are as follows: Transfers Out Transfers In: General Debt service Streets capital projects Non -major government Utility system Internal Service Total General Non -major Utility System Airport Non -major Internal Governmental Fund Fund Proprietary Service Total $ -- $ 528,012 $ 4,551,430 $ 285,687 $ 55,302 $ 529,364 $ 5,949,795 4,533,651 2,381,526 -- 49,850 -- 234,357 7,199,384 -- 3,295 -- -- 3,295 16,441,172 -- -- 16,441,172 -- 331,500 331,500 3,667,299 1,999,927 -- 5,667,226 $ 24,642,122 $ 2,912,833 $ 6,551,357 $ 335,537 $ 55,302 $ 1,095,221 $ 35,592,372 During the year, various interfund transfers were made to finance expenditures and service debt. The $24,642,122 General Fund transfers out includes transfers of $4,533,651 for payment of debt service, $909,706 for capital equipment, $1,021,065 for future capital replacement, $1,077,424 for the Infor ERP implementation, $213,750 to subsidize the arena/convention center operations, $659,104 to Facilities Fund, $16,017,952 to streets, and $209,470 to the Federal/State Grants Fund as matching grants. The General Fund received transfers in of $5,949,795 of which $5,062,871 was for administrative service charges and $357,560 was indirect cost reimbursements from the Federal/State Grants Fund. $529,364 was for the transfer of 5 employees from Risk fund to General Fund. The Debt Service Fund received transfers in of $7,199,384 from the various funds (including the General Fund) for payment of debt service principal and interest and to establish debt service reserves. Streets Capital Projects received $3,295 from Infrastructure Fund. Transfers were made from the Utility System Fund to the Internal Service Funds including $741,134 to Maintenance Service Fund for future capital replacement, $1,205,587 to MIS Fund for ERP implementation, and $53,206 to Facilities Fund due to reorganization. The Utility System Fund also transferred $4,551,430 to General Fund for administrative service charges. The Airport Fund transferred out $285,687 to the General Fund for administrative service charge and $55,302 to Debt Service for payment of debt service principal and interest. The Internal Service Funds transferred out $529,364 to the General Fund for the transfer of 5 employees and $331,500 to Utility System Funds to return funds previously contributed to Fleet Maintenance that were unused. In the government -wide financial statements, the solid waste activity, which is part of the General Fund, is presented as a business -type activity. The $10,909,823 accumulated fund balance of the solid waste activity is accounted for as a transfer to governmental activities in the statement of activities. 90 City of Corpus Christi Interfund advances outstanding at September 30, 2015, are as follows: To From Golf Fund General Fund Public Health & Safety Capital Project Fund General Fund Amount $ 770,688 500,000 $ 1,270,688 The General Fund advanced the Golf Fund money to cover its negative unrestricted fund balance. This advance is expected to be paid back over a period of 4-5 years, based on anticipated increased revenues from the Golf courses due to a management contract with a private firm. The General Fund made an advance to the Public Health & Safety Capital Project Fund as a loan approved by ordinance. The loan is to fund the Police Public Safety Warehouse Project and will be repaid from the Law Enforcement Trust Fund over a 4 year period. Interfund receivables and payables at September 30, 2015, are as follows: Interfund Interfund Receivable Payable Governmental funds Other non -major governmental funds $ $ 1,029,019 Enterprise funds Airport fund 1,029,019 Total $ 1,029,019 $ 1,029,019 The change in the interfund receivables and payables between the current and prior year may not agree to the "Change in assets and liabilities section" of the "Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities" in the Statement of Cash Flows due to non-operating activity. 16. Fund Deficits At fiscal year end, the Golf Centers Fund had an accumulated deficit. The City entered into a management contract with a private firm to operate the golf centers beginning February 1, 2011. Revenues from the lease payments are expected to reduce the deficit. With the implementation of GASB 68 in Fiscal Year 2014-2015, three Internal Service Funds ended with negative fund balance at September 30, 2015: Stores, Engineering and Municipal Information Systems. Since the full Net Pension Liability must now be recorded — but not necessarily funded — these Internal Service Funds will likely continue to carry negative fund balances in future fiscal years. The City's policy is to increase its contribution rate by 2% each year until the fully funded rate is achieved. Without the GASB 68 adjustment, only the Engineering Fund would have had a negative fund balance of $341,053. This was an improvement from the prior year's negative fund balance of $1,753,611. 17. Conduit Debt Obligations The Corpus Christi Housing Finance Corporation (CCHFC), Corpus Christi Industrial Development Corporation (CCIDC), and the Coastal Bend Health Facilities Development Corporation are public non-profit corporations created by the City under State law to facilitate financing of authorized projects. These entities issued bonds to unrelated commercial entities. As of September 30, 2015, there were five series of bonds outstanding with an aggregate principal amount payable of $41,766,780. The bonds are not liabilities of the City or the respective corporations and are solely payable from revenues of the various commercial entities. 91 City of Corpus Christi 18. Commitments The City has entered or will enter into contracts for the construction or renovation of various facilities as follows: Expenditures Additional Required Project Through Funds Future Authorization 09/30/2015 Conunitted Financinu Airport $ 90,175,241 $ 77,973,247 $ 12,201,994 $ Arena 247,013 146,923 100,090 Bayfront Development 14,177,311 8,238,180 5,939,131 City Buildings and Facilities 20,112,540 13,138,705 6,973,835 Convention Facility 255,034 228,318 26,716 Library 102,897 40,150 62,747 Packery Channel 3,109,095 1,036,200 2,072,895 Park 29,883,547 11,118,705 18,764,842 Police Building 750,955 193,548 557,407 Fire 2,099,344 326,455 1,772,889 Public Health & Safety 1,364,347 1,271,682 92,665 Sanitary Landfill 13,144,291 7,767,477 5,376,814 Seawall 18,850,187 2,914,819 15,935,368 Street 225,549,843 79,438,945 146,110,898 Water 287,495,896 182,442,251 105,053,645 Storm Water 112,453,984 38,572,144 73,881,840 Wastewater 199,074,710 111,066,981 88,007,729 Gas 8,418,675 5,501,099 2,917,576 Total $ 1,027,264,910 $ 541,415,829 $ 485,849,081 $ The assigned fund balance in the General Fund includes $4,139,593 encumbered commitments related to unperformed contracts for goods or services. 19. Service Concession Arrangement for City Golf Courses The City has an agreement with Foresight Corpus Christi Golf, LLC (Foresight), under which Foresight will operate and collect user fees from the Gabe Lozano, Sr. Golf Course and the Oso Beach Golf Course. Foresight pays the City 50% of net cash flows from operations annually The City uses the funds received to fund the City's operational, debt service, and capital improvement costs related to the golf courses. The City reports the golf courses and related equipment as a capital asset with a carrying amount of $527,609 at September 30, 2015. 92 City of Corpus Christi 20. Segment Information for Enterprise Funds The City issued revenue bonds to fmance certain improvements to its utility system, airport and marina. Because the utility system and airport funds are a segment and reported as major funds in the fund financial statements, segment disclosures herein are not reported. The marina activity is accounted for as other enterprise fund in the fund financial statements. Segment information of marina fund as of and for the year ended September 30, 2015, is as follows: Marina Fund Current assets, excluding restricted assets $ 1,014,648 Capital assets 9,245,937 Total assets 10,260,585 Deferred outflows of resources 121,226 Current liabilities Long-term liabilities Total liabilities 598,106 5,821,571 6,419,677 Deferred inflows of resources 17,765 Net position Invested in capital assets, net of related debt 3,999,591 Unrestricted (52,222) Net position $ 3,947,369 Operating revenue $ 1,908,416 Depreciation (540,453) Other operating expenses (1,303,814) Operating income (loss) 64,149 Nonoperating income (expense) (91,325) Capital contributions 605,246 Transfers (50,696) Net income (loss) 527,374 Net position beginning of year 3,887,277 Prior period adjustment (470,282) Net position end of year $ 3,944,369 Net cash flow provided by (used for) Operating activities $ 614,836 Noncapital financing activities (50,696) Capital and related fmancing activities (1,255,469) Investment activities 5,921 Beginning cash, cash equivalents and investments 1,069,861 Ending cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 384,453 93 City of Corpus Christi REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS - ANALYSIS OF FUNDING PROGRESS YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 (6) Percentage of (4) Unfunded Unfunded Actuarial (1) (2) (3) Actuarial (5) Accrued Actuarial Actuarial Funded Accrued Annual Liability to Valuation Value of Accrued Ratio Liability Covered Covered Payroll Date Assets Liability (1) / (2) (2) - (1) Payroll Ratio Other Post Employment Benefits Plan - Citicare 8/1/2009 - 12,524,728 0.0% 12,524,728 74,872,277 16.7% 8/1/2011 - 1,224,232 0.0% 1,224,232 61,862,815 2.0% 8/1/2013 3,800,918 0.0% 3,800,918 60,938,657 6.2% Other Post Employment Benefits Plan - Public Safety 8/1/2009 - 13,584,349 0.0% 13,584,349 32,947,021 41.2% 8/1/2011 - 5,139,857 0.0% 5,139,857 26,515,429 19.4% 8/1/2013 - 4,461,663 0.0% 4,461,663 28,335,830 15.7% Other Post Employment Benefits Plan - Fire 8/1/2009 - 13,537,686 0.0% 13,537,686 23,847,834 56.8% 8/1/2011 - 6,351,600 0.0% 6,351,600 20,862,937 30.4% 8/1/2013 - 3,558,944 0.0% 3,558,944 23,486,591 15.2% OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PLANS ANNUAL REQUIRED CONTRIBUTIONS (1) Percentage of Annual (2) of ARC Required Actual Contributed Contribution (ARC) Contribution (2) / (1) Citicare 8/1/2009 1,960,046 704,363 35.9% 8/1/2011 94,775 (79,992) -84.4% 8/1/2013 350,161 117,308 33.5% Public Safety 8/1/2009 987,678 443,157 44.9% 8/1/2011 295,160 445,823 151.0% 8/1/2013 296,175 437,319 147.7% Fire 8/1/2009 1,023,928 407,364 39.8% 8/1/2011 355,425 358,718 100.9% 8/1/2013 229,235 (142,356) -62.1% 94 City of Corpus Christi REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN THE CITY'S NET PENSION LABILITIES AND RELATED RATIOS CURRENT YEAR (1) TMRS FFRS 2015 2015 Total Pension Liabilities Service cost $ 14,552,695 $ 4,144,217 Interest 54,768,864 15,650,548 Changes of benefit terms - - Difference between expected and actual experience (5,660,997) - Changes of assumptions - 313,566 Benefit payments (43,536,263) (11,612,717) Net Change in Total Pension Liabilities 20,124,299 8,495,614 Total Pension Liabilities - Beginning 796,904,133 197,293,990 (2) Total Pension Liabilities - Ending (a) $ 817,028,432 $ 205,789,604 Plan Fiduciary Net Positions Contributions - Employer $ 17,786,102 $ 6,007,048 Contributions - Employee 6,905,864 3,526,756 Net investment income 35,519,832 6,949,478 Benefit payments (43,536,263) (11,612,717) Administrative expense (370,905) (215,379) Other (30,495) - Net Change in Plan Fidcuiary Net Positions $ 16,274,135 $ 4,655,186 Plan Fiduciary Net Positions - Beginning 621,013,854 126,159,233 Plan Fiduciary Net Positions - Ending (b) $ 637,287,989 $ 130,814,419 Net Pension Liabilities - Ending (a) - (b) Plan Fiduciary Net Positions as a Percentage of Total Pension Liabilities Covered Employee Payroll Net Pension Liabilities as a Percentage of Covered Employee Payroll $ 179,740,443 $ 74,975,185 78% 64% 115,045,985 29,484,531 156% 254% (1) Measurement date is December 31, nine months prior to the fiscal year end. This schedule is presented to the requirement to show information for 10 years. However, until a full 10 -year trend is compiled, only available information is shown. Amounts recognized in the fiscal year represent changes between the current and prior measurement dates. (2) Determined from the total pension liability as of December 31, 2014, but based on the actuarial assumptions for the December 31, 2012, actuarial valuation, using the roll back procedure allowed for the initial year of implementing GASB 68. City of Corpus Christi REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SCHEDULE OF CONTRIBUTIONS TEXAS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM 2006 2007 2008 2009 Required contribution $ 13,452,618 $ 14,035,058 $ 15,448,938 $ 21,009,512 Actual contributions 13,452,618 14,035,058 15,448,938 17,100,193 Contribution deficiency - - - 3,909,319 Covered employee payroll 97,756,667 106,042,731 140,997,733 108,555,179 Actuarially determined contributions as a percentage of covered employee payroll 13.76% 13.24% 10.96% 19.35% Actuals contributions as a percentage of covered employee payroll 13.76% 13.24% 10.96% 15.75% Notes to Schedule Valuation date: Actuarial determined contribution rates are caclulated as of December 31 and become effective in January, 12 months and a day later. Methods and assumptions used to determine contribution rate for 2015: Actuarial cost method Entry Age Normal Amortization method Level percentage of payroll, closed Remaining amortization period 14 years Asset valuation method 10 year smoothed; 15% soft corridor Inflation 3% Salary increases 3.5% to 12.0% including inflation Investment rate of return 7.00% Retirement age Experience -based table of rates that are specific to the City's plan of benefits. Last updated for the 2010 valuation pursuant to an experience study of the period 2005 - 2009 Mortality Updated service credits and Cost of Living Adjustments * FY2014 was a 14 month year RP2000 Combined Mortality Table with Blue Collar Adjustment with male rates multiplied by 109% and female rates multiplied by 103% and projected on a fully generational basis with scale BB For calendar year 2012-2015, the City adopted an ordinance to change the "annually repeating" feature of the City's plan regarding updated service credits and 70% CPI increases to annuitants to "ad hoc" (one time only basis). However, these changes are considered to be substantively automatic so the ful rate contribution has been calculated assuming that they will occur. 96 City of Corpus Christi 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 * 2015 $ 24,362,494 $ 25,218,616 $ 22,769,666 $ 22,665,524 $ 27,872,623 $ 24,928,854 18,330,551 16,832,574 15,541,644 16,101,720 20,302,711 18,974,205 6,031,943 8,386,042 7,228,022 6,563,804 7,569,912 5,954,649 114,395, 501 110,562,068 108,260,052 107,828,105 135,847,965 117,949,385 21.30% 22.81% 21.03% 21.02% 20.52% 21.14% 16.02% 15.22% 14.36% 14.93% 14.95% 16.09% 97 City of Corpus Christi REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SCHEDULE OF CONTRIBUTIONS FIRE FIGHTERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM 2006 2007 2008 2009 Required contributions $ 2,913,749 $ 3,040,260 $ 3,541,183 $ 3,964,376 Actual contributions 2,913,749 3,040,260 3,541,183 3,964,376 Contribution deficiency - - Covered employee payroll ** 21,946,798 ** 24,268,094 Contributions as a percentage of covered employee payroll 13.85% 16.34% * FY2014 was a 14 month year ** Actuarial study done every other year 98 City of Corpus Christi 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 * 2015 4,440,572 $ 5,158,128 $ 5,254,970 $ 5,640,851 $ 7,009,621 $ 6,266,444 4,440,572 5,158,128 5,254,970 5,640,851 7,009,621 6,266,444 ** 27,723,869 18.61% ** 99 29,459,098 19.15% ** 30,156,126 20.78% CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 Combining and Individual Fund Financial Statements and Schedules Governmental Funds General Fund — Used to account for resources traditionally associated with government and which are not required to be accounted for in another fund. General Fund City of Corpus Christi GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Exhibit 6-A ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 50,587,618 Accounts 5,807,922 Property leases 15 Taxes 3,231,490 Demolition liens 4,149,465 Employees 34,493 Intergovernmental 5,000,872 Miscellaneous 1,655,645 Allowance for uncollectibles (6,722,424) Net receivables 13,157,478 Prepaid items Advances to other funds 1,873 1,270,688 Total assets $ 65,017,657 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Liabilities Accounts payable $ 3,247,255 Accrued liabilities 7,034,566 Deposits 502,787 Liability to claimants - escheat property 86,886 Due to other governmental agencies 362,016 Unearned revenues Taxes 1,578,223 Other 684,423 Total unearned revenues 2,262,646 Total liabilities 13,496,156 Fund balance Prepaid items 1,873 Advances to other funds 1,270,688 Total nonspendable 1,272,561 Restricted Vital statistic record retention 307,831 Judicial/Court improvements 55,993 Fire contribution trust 5,585 PEG equipment and facilities 19,768 Total restricted 389,177 Committed Major contingencies 39,525,111 Government access equipment 11,959 Radio system capital replacement 27,925 Total committed 39,564,995 Assigned Development Services 5,014,281 Health 1115 Waiver 962,018 Subsequent year's expenditures 4,139,593 Arts and Cultural Commission 4,252 Total assigned 10,120,144 Unassigned 174,624 Total fund balances 51,521,501 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 65,017,657 City of Corpus Christi GENERAL FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (BUDGET BASIS), COMPARED TO BUDGET YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Budget Actual Adjustments GAAP Budget Original Final Basis Basis Taxes General property taxes Ad valorem taxes - current $ 59,737,000 $ 59,737,000 $ 60,145,207 $ Ad valorem taxes - delinquent 950,000 950,000 984,868 Penalties and interest 635,000 635,000 741,449 Industrial District - in lieu of taxes 7,375,000 7,375,000 7,575,254 Other Payment in lieu of taxes 115,023 115,023 55,599 Special Inventory Tax Escrow Refund 100,000 100,000 65,622 Housing Authority - in lieu of taxes 26,500 26,500 28,601 Total general property taxes 68,938,523 68,938,523 69,596,600 City sales tax Liquor drink tax Bingo tax Business fees Electric franchise Electric franchise - Nueces Co-op Telecommunications fees CATV franchise Taxicab franchise AT&T right of way lease fee Total business fees Total taxes and business fees 63,209,346 1,351,891 310,034 9,794,751 240,009 3,785,855 3,613,987 48,000 1,200 63,209,346 58,332,449 1,351,891 1,372,247 310,034 378,244 9,794,751 240,009 3,785,855 3,613,987 48,000 1,200 17,483,802 17,483,802 151,293,596 151,293,596 9,635,395 125,690 3,723,351 3,741,851 56,580 1,300 17,284,167 146,963,707 Licenses and permits Amusement licenses 18,000 18,000 16,714 Pipeline - license fee 70,000 70,000 65,340 Beer and liquor licenses -- -- 93,942 (93,942) Electricians licenses and exam fees -- -- 35,805 (35,805) Auto wrecker permits 18,000 18,000 174,868 Taxi driver permits 5,000 5,000 8,960 Metal recycling permits -- -- 9 House mover licenses 266 (266) Forfeited house mover deposits -- -- 10,500 (10,500) Other business licenses 20,000 20,000 18,200 Building permits -- -- 3,128,535 (3,128,535) Electrical permits 204,821 (204,821) Plumbing permits 355,962 (355,962) Mechanical permits 141,417 (141,417) Certificate of occupancy fees 33,712 (33,712) Street cut permits 672 (672) Plan review fees 1,182,080 (1,182,080) Mechanical registration fees 22,895 (22,895) Lawn Irrigator registration fees 4,455 (4,455) Backflow prevention assembly tester 12,395 (12,395) Driveway permit fees 16,178 (16,178) Revocable easement fees 65,026 -- Street easement closure fees 17,789 (17,789) (Continued) 102 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 6-B Variance Actual Final Budget Budget Positive Basis (Negative) $ 60,145,207 $ 408,207 984,868 34,868 741,449 106,449 7,575,254 200,254 55,599 (59,424) 65,622 (34,378) 28,601 2,101 69,596,600 658,077 58,332,449 (4,876,897) 1,372,247 20,356 378,244 68,210 9,635,395 (159,356) 125,690 (114,319) 3,723,351 (62,504) 3,741,851 127,864 56,580 8,580 1,300 100 17,284,167 (199,635) 146,963,707 (4,329,889) 16,714 (1,286) 65,340 (4,660) 174,868 156,868 8,960 3,960 9 9 18,200 (1,800) 65,026 65,026 103 City of Corpus Christi GENERAL FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (BUDGET BASIS), COMPARED TO BUDGET YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Budget Actual Adjustments GAAP Budget Original Final Basis Basis Licenses and permits (continued) Backflow prey device filing fee 105,080 (105,080) Research and survey fees 7,555 (7,555) Defemnent agreement fees 12,097 (12,097) Construction document fees 355 (355) Billboard fees 4,042 (4,042) Vacant building inspection fees 500 -- House moving route permits 549 (549) Oversized load permits -- -- 19,597 (19,597) Special event permits 850 850 750 Beach parking permits 700,000 700,000 840,586 Fire prevention permits 225,000 225,000 255,225 Pet licenses 72,000 72,000 74,277 Food service permits 610,000 610,000 679,547 Ambulance permits 2,500 2,500 2,000 Total licenses and permits 1,741,350 1,741,350 7,612,701 (5,410,699) Grants Federal Emergency Management Assistance EEOC contribution HUD Intrim Agreemnt Reim/Grnts Drug test reimbursements Sexual Assault Exam General Land Office - beach cleaning Total grants 70,000 32,400 85,000 20,000 130,000 45,000 382,400 70,000 32,400 85,000 20,000 130,000 45,000 59,600 8,824 170,088 64,463 382,400 302,975 Charges for services General governmental services Zoning fees 139,722 (139,722) Platting fees 69,387 (69,387) Board of Adjustment appeal fees -- -- 6,630 (6,630) Attorney fees - demolition & paving liens 95,000 95,000 55,054 Sale of City publications 350 350 340 Blueprint sales and GIS sales 12 (12) Candidate filing fees 1,200 1,200 -- Nonprofit registration fees 700 700 124 Total general governmental services 97,250 97,250 271,269 (215,751) Police Police towing and storage charges 1,210,000 1,320,000 1,318,116 Police impound certified mail recovery 75,000 75,000 77,750 Police accident reports 76,000 76,000 43,314 Proceeds from auction 925,000 925,000 658,544 Proceeds from auction - online 15,000 15,000 4,935 Parking meter collections 250,000 250,000 162,899 Police open record request 5,000 5,000 23,943 Police subpoenas 1,500 1,500 4,455 Fingerprinting fees 4,500 4,500 5,856 Customs/FBI 165,000 165,000 86,721 (Continued) 104 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 6-B (Continued) Variance Actual Final Budget Budget Positive Basis (Negative) 500 500 750 (100) 840,586 140,586 255,225 30,225 74,277 2,277 679,547 69,547 2,000 (500) 2,202,002 460,652 -- (70,000) 59,600 27,200 -- (85,000) 8,824 (11,176) 170,088 40,088 64,463 19,463 302,975 (79,425) 55,054 (39,946) 340 (10) -- (1,200) 124 (576) 55,518 (41,732) 1,318,116 (1,884) 77,750 2,750 43,314 (32,686) 658,544 (266,456) 4,935 (10,065) 162,899 (87,101) 23,943 18,943 4,455 2,955 5,856 1,356 86,721 (78,279) 105 City of Corpus Christi GENERAL FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (BUDGET BASIS), COMPARED TO BUDGET YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Budget Actual Adjustments GAAP Budget Original Final Basis Basis Police (continued) Police Security Services 150,000 150,000 81,304 DWI Videotaping 1,600 1,600 1,644 Alarm system permits and services 450,000 450,000 561,640 800 MHz radio 200,000 200,000 176,768 9-1-1 wireless service fees 1,450,000 1,450,000 1,592,828 9-1-1 wireline service fees 1,425,000 1,464,533 1,264,921 Police C.A.D. calls 600 600 2,459 Restitution 53,525 CCISD-Crossing guards 30,000 30,000 23,618 School crossing guard program 65,612 65,612 63,629 Nueces county - Metrocom 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,262,596 Pound fees & handling charges 45,000 45,000 48,628 Animal trap fees 600 600 1,115 Pest control services 33,300 33,300 8,200 Microchipping fees 8,000 8,000 4,352 Deceased Animal Pick Up 7,200 7,200 7,630 S/N Kennel Cough -- -- 932 Adoption fees -- -- 4,054 Animal Control Adoption 50,000 50,000 35,619 Total police 7,843,912 7,993,445 7,581,995 Fire Hazmat response calls 10,000 10,000 18,911 Fire service - outside city limits -- -- 37,283 Honor Guard 1,000 1,000 200 Emergency management alert system fees 12,000 12,000 10,000 Pipeline reporting administrative fees 45,000 45,000 50,626 Total fire 68,000 68,000 117,020 Ambulance Emergency calls Nueces Co OCL charges Total Ambulance 6,100,000 6,100,000 6,100,000 6,123,474 32,048 6,100,000 6,155,522 Streets State of Texas - expressway lighting 204,000 204,000 141,010 Port of CC -Bridge Lighting 20,000 20,000 111,481 Subdivision street lighting participation 50,000 50,000 -- Total streets 274,000 274,000 252,491 Solid waste services Residential refuse collection fees 16,362,000 Commercial and industrial refuse collection f 1,788,266 Municipal solid waste system service charge 3,555,200 Refuse disposal charges 8,711,108 Disposal charges - landfill project 3,182,000 Refuse collection permits 18,000 Special debris pickup 265,000 SW -Mulch 17,000 Brush fees 55,000 Recycling 855,000 Recycling collection fees 985,760 Recycling Bank fees 742,350 Recycling Bank Incentive fees 247,450 Unsecured load charge 35,000 Total solid waste services 36,819,134 (Continued) 16,362,000 1,788,266 3,555,200 8,711,108 3,182,000 18,000 265,000 17,000 55,000 855,000 985,760 742,350 247,450 35,000 16,480,796 1,744,330 3,585,383 8,967,397 3,263,423 18,449 331,717 9,772 85,028 975,813 966,462 747,149 248,232 51,450 36,819,134 37,475,401 106 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 6-B (Continued) Variance Actual Final Budget Budget Positive Basis (Negative) 81,304 (68,696) 1,644 44 561,640 111,640 176,768 (23,232) 1,592,828 142,828 1,264,921 (199,612) 2,459 1,859 53,525 53,525 23,618 (6,382) 63,629 (1,983) 1,262,596 62,596 48,628 3,628 1,115 515 8,200 (25,100) 4,352 (3,648) 7,630 430 932 932 4,054 4,054 35,619 (14,381) 7,581,995 (411,450) 18,911 8,911 37,283 37,283 200 (800) 10,000 (2,000) 50,626 5,626 117,020 49,020 6,123,474 32,048 6,155,522 23,474 32,048 55,522 141,010 (62,990) 111,481 91,481 -- (50,000) 252,491 (21,509) 16,480,796 118,796 1,744,330 (43,936) 3,585,383 30,183 8,967,397 256,289 3,263,423 81,423 18,449 449 331,717 66,717 9,772 (7,228) 85,028 30,028 975,813 120,813 966,462 (19,298) 747,149 4,799 248,232 782 51,450 16,450 37,475,401 656,267 107 City of Corpus Christi GENERAL FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (BUDGET BASIS), COMPARED TO BUDGET YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Budget Actual Adjustments GAAP Budget Original Final Basis Basis Health services Vital records office sales 427,000 427,000 444,794 Laboratory services 22,400 Nueces County - health administration 196,928 196,928 178,678 Swimming pool inspection fees 47,200 47,200 53,190 Medicaid 1115 Waiver 2,512,429 1,220,938 1,220,937 TB/PC Fees -- -- 12,375 Total health services 3,183,557 1,892,066 1,932,374 Recreation services Swimming pools 210,000 210,000 187,042 Swimming instruction fees 100,000 100,000 108,189 H.E. Butt tennis center 34,500 34,500 25,784 Al Kruse tennis center 19,600 19,600 11,414 Athletic events 141,580 141,580 142,761 Athletic instruction fees 39,728 39,728 47,018 Facilities rentals 31,965 31,965 45,219 Latchkey program 2,520,329 2,520,329 2,461,266 Buc days/Bayfest 28,200 28,200 66,632 Heritage Park revenues 2,160 2,160 1,176 Pavilion Rentals 1,000 1,000 991 Tourist district rentals 12,000 12,000 11,063 Camping Permit Fees 3,500 3,500 4,212 Senior Center rentals 36,113 36,113 37,367 Class instruction fees 21,648 21,648 10,204 Recreation instruction fees 54,795 54,795 39,252 Recreation center rentals 7,155 7,155 9,274 Other recreation services 73,000 73,000 37,440 Total recreation services 3,337,273 3,337,273 3,246,304 Libraries Fines 80,048 80,048 70,502 Lost book charges 6,158 6,158 6,390 Copy machine sales 40,761 40,761 45,357 Other library revenue 15,421 37,319 36,364 Interlibrary fees 552 552 484 Library book sales 4,095 4,095 4,591 Total libraries 147,035 168,933 163,688 Museums Admissions 116,522 116,522 214,349 Museum gift shop sales 50,000 50,000 97,671 Special program fees 160,904 McGregor reproduction fees 5,629 5,629 5,168 Facility rental 42,385 42,385 29,876 Education group programs 22,804 22,804 55,873 School District - museum educational progra 22,000 22,000 22,000 Parties and recitals 12,058 12,058 11,832 Columbus ships 85,135 85,135 -- Museum - other revenue -- -- 49,882 Total museums 356,533 356,533 647,555 Total charges for services 58,226,694 57,106,634 57,843,619 (215,751) (Continued) 108 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 6-B (Continued) Variance Actual Final Budget Budget Positive Basis (Negative) 444,794 17,794 22,400 22,400 178,678 (18,250) 53,190 5,990 1,220,937 (1) 12,375 12,375 1,932,374 40,308 187,042 (22,958) 108,189 8,189 25,784 (8,716) 11,414 (8,186) 142,761 1,181 47,018 7,290 45,219 13,254 2,461,266 (59,063) 66,632 38,432 1,176 (984) 991 (9) 11,063 (937) 4,212 712 37,367 1,254 10,204 (11,444) 39,252 (15,543) 9,274 2,119 37,440 (35,560) 3,246,304 (90,969) 70,502 (9,546) 6,390 232 45,357 4,596 36,364 (955) 484 (68) 4,591 496 163,688 (5,245) 214,349 97,827 97,671 47,671 160,904 160,904 5,168 (461) 29,876 (12,509) 55,873 33,069 22,000 -- 11,832 (226) (85,135) 49,882 49,882 647,555 291,022 57,627,868 521,234 109 City of Corpus Christi GENERAL FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (BUDGET BASIS), COMPARED TO BUDGET YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Budget Actual Adjustments GAAP Budget Original Final Basis Basis Fines and forfeitures Moving vehicle fines 2,596,238 2,596,238 278,178 School Crssg Gd Pgm-Cvl Citation 12,000 12,000 Parking fmes 74,154 74,154 389,063 Civil parking citations 200,000 200,000 235,007 General fines 705,777 705,777 2,085,385 Officers fees 156,028 156,028 151,748 Uniform Traffic Act fines 72,134 72,134 19,428 Warrant fees 108,397 108,397 127,756 Municipal Court State fee discount 238,501 238,501 109,254 Time Pay Fee - Court 17,331 17,331 15,656 Time Pay Fee - City 69,323 69,323 62,666 644.102 Comm Vehicle Enforce -- -- 38,592 Miscellaneous revenue 52,402 52,402 31,216 Juvenile expungement fee 148 148 13 Failure to appear fines 190,719 190,719 2,510 Animal control fmes 15,431 15,431 2,778 Teen Court city fee -- -- 20 Other court fmes 194,301 194,301 563,784 Total fmes and forfeitures 4,702,884 4,702,884 4,113,054 Earnings on investments 905,000 905,000 491,505 Miscellaneous Rental of general property 96,000 96,000 323,053 Recovery on damage claims -- -- 82,300 Contributions and donations 27,097 32,097 27,193 Automated teller machines 1,200 1,200 1,200 Late fees on returned check 300 300 450 Radio system participation 9,500 9,500 1,688 Graffiti control 2,500 2,500 961 Sale of city property 82,500 100,997 352,318 Copy sales 6,500 6,500 5,280 Adminstrative processing fee 15,000 15,000 4,344 Demolition and weed liens 160,000 160,000 176,467 Purchase discounts 220,000 220,000 250,401 Vending machine sales 9,144 9,144 55,405 Late Fees on delinquent -- -- 3,000 Claim settlements -- -- 67 Naming rights for convention center 180,000 180,000 213,750 Miscellaneous 146,000 148,000 135,842 Total miscellaneous revenue 955,741 981,238 1,633,719 (13,510) (7,607) (6,074) (13,681) Reimbursements Interdepartmental 2,867,685 2,867,685 3,420,578 Finance cost recovery - CIP 1,155,624 1,155,624 1,155,623 Fire hydrant maintenance 327,472 327,472 327,472 800 MHz radio - interdepartmental 335,952 335,952 335,952 Total reimbursements revenue 4,686,733 4,686,733 5,239,625 Total revenues 222,894,398 221,799,835 218,961,280 (414,016) (Continued) 110 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 6-B (Continued) Variance Actual Final Budget Budget Positive Basis (Negative) 278,178 (2,318,060) (12,000) 389,063 314,909 235,007 35,007 2,085,385 1,379,608 151,748 (4,280) 19,428 (52,706) 127,756 19,359 109,254 (129,247) 15,656 (1,675) 62,666 (6,657) 38,592 38,592 31,216 (21,186) 13 (135) 2,510 (188,209) 2,778 (12,653) 20 20 563,784 369,483 4,113,054 (589,830) 477,995 (427,005) 323,053 227,053 82,300 82,300 27,193 (4,904) 1,200 -- 450 150 1,688 (7,812) 961 (1,539) 344,711 243,714 5,280 (1,220) 4,344 (10,656) 176,467 16,467 250,401 30,401 55,405 46,261 3,000 3,000 67 67 213,750 33,750 129,768 (18,232) 1,620,038 638,800 3,420,578 1,155,623 327,472 335,952 552,893 (1) 5,239,625 552,892 218,547,264 (3,252,571) 111 City of Corpus Christi GENERAL FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (BUDGET BASIS), COMPARED TO BUDGET YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Budget Actual Adjustments GAAP Budget Original Final Basis Basis Other fmancing sources Capital leases 4,137,196 (4,137,196) Transfers in Administrative charges Federal grants 70,411 70,411 126,670 Visitor facility 151,551 151,551 151,551 Reinvestment Zone #2 125,963 125,963 17,558 Gas division 636,235 636,235 636,235 Wastewater division 1,368,271 1,368,271 1,368,271 Water division 2,546,924 2,546,924 2,546,924 Airport 285,687 285,687 285,687 Golf 4,606 4,606 4,606 -- Development Services 247,552 247,552 -- 247,552 Marina 50,696 50,696 50,696 -- Reinvestment Zone #3 -- -- 1,344 Other Liability & Employee Benefits Fund 529,365 529,365 529,364 Federal grants -- -- 230,890 Total transfers in 6,017,261 6,017,261 5,949,796 247,552 Transfers out Debt Service Fund For Community Service Police Grants Cash Match Street Fund Visitor's Facility Fund For capital outlay For capital replacement Municipal Information Systems Fund Development Services Fund Facility Maintenance Total transfers out Total other sources (237,840) (156,076) (62,000) (15,017,954) (180,000) (1,039,000) (500,000) (200,000) (17,392,870) (11,375,609) (237,840) (4,533,652) 4,295,813 (156,076) (156,076) -- (62,000) (53,394) (16,017,954) (16,017,954) (180,000) (213,750) (1,039,000) (971,065) -- (959,706) 959,706 (1,077,424) (1,077,424) -- (500,000) (500,000) (659,104) (659,104) -- (19,929,398) (24,642,125) 4,755,519 (13,912,137) (14,555,133) 865,875 Total revenues and other sources $ 211,518,789 $ 207,887,698 $ 204,406,147 $ 451,859 112 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 6-B (Continued) Variance Actual Final Budget Budget Positive Basis (Negative) 126,670 151,551 17,558 636,235 1,368,271 2,546,924 285,687 4,606 247,552 50,696 1,344 56,259 (108,405) 1,344 529,364 (1) 230,890 230,890 6,197,348 180,087 (237,839) 1 (156,076) -- (53,394) 8,606 (16,017,954) -- (213,750) (33,750) (971,065) 67,935 (1,077,424) (500,000) (659,104) (19,886,606) 42,792 (13,689,258) 222,879 $ 204,858,006 $ (3,029,692) 113 City of Corpus Christi GENERAL FUND SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES (BUDGET BASIS), COMPARED TO BUDGET YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Actual GAAP Expenditures Personal Materials Contractual Other Capital Services & Supplies Services Charges Outlays Reimbursements General government Control City Council and City Secretary $ 635,658 $ 44,889 $ 423,075 $ 117,979 $ -- $ Group Managers 584,586 (1,583) 161,443 65,079 City Auditor 349,170 6,950 14,328 59,948 City Manager's Office 586,738 9,210 5,094 62,703 Management and budget office 547,177 16,386 23,868 61,956 Public Information 322,120 7,085 157,325 43,288 Capital budgeting 152,186 296 707 14,244 Total general government - control 3,177,635 83,233 785,840 425,197 (577,812) (577,812) Staff agencies Director of finance 302,857 894 3,056 57,890 -- -- Accounting 1,557,961 18,358 570,764 317,799 - (577,812) Central cashiering 459,432 1,563 9,980 130,006 -- -- Cash management 264,377 6,295 28,224 45,110 -- -- City Attorney 2,164,130 52,021 130,998 202,113 -- -- Economic development -- -- 283,493 -- -- -- Economic development incentives -- -- -- 1,886,781 -- -- Housing & Community Development 81,647 2,642 5,248 188,464 -- (37,510) Downtown Management District -- -- 337,667 -- -- -- Development Services administration 678,566 7,155 427,893 561,145 -- (78,000) Planning -- 6,071 1,059,696 - - - NCAD/NC-Administration -- -- 1,258,064 -- Human resources 1,016,530 33,931 66,436 162,942 Training 219,725 4,760 174,247 16,385 ADA Compliance 54,990 603 25,980 6,348 Human relations 239,395 1,881 9,914 38,633 Fair housing 21,592 1,124 24,091 11,699 Total staff agencies 7,061,202 137,298 4,415,751 3,625,315 -- (693,322) Engineering services Special services 887,992 3,549 267,789 29,952 -- (581,772) Process Management Development 533,102 11,432 8,050 33,254 -- (22,764) Total engineering services 1,421,094 14,981 275,839 63,206 -- (604,536) Other expenditures Uncollectible accounts Major memberships Purchasing/messenger service allocation Reserve appropriations Reserve for accrued pay Total other expenditures Total general government (Continued) -- -- 44,146 -- -- - 91,883 - - - -- -- 300,804 -- -- - 91,883 344,950 11,659,931 235,512 5,569,313 4,458,668 -- (1,875,670) 114 City of Corpus Christi Adjustments Actual Budget Total Budget Budget Expenditures Basis Basis Original Final $ 1,221,601 $ 809,525 430,396 663,745 649,387 529,818 (410,379) 3,894,093 364,697 1,887,070 600,981 344,006 2,549,262 283,493 1,886,781 240,491 337,667 1,596,759 1,065,767 1,258,064 1,279,839 415,117 87,921 289,823 58,506 14,546,244 607,510 563,074 1,170,584 44,146 91,883 300,804 436,833 Exhibit 6-C Variance Final Budget Positive (Negative) -- $ 1,221,601 $ 852,864 $ 1,524,487 $ 302,886 -- 809,525 879,816 1,057,731 248,206 - 430,396 447,397 447,397 17,001 -- 663,745 653,862 680,932 17,187 -- 649,387 714,046 744,967 95,580 -- 529,818 676,588 861,669 331,851 577,812 167,433 175,646 175,646 8,213 577,812 4,471,905 4,400,219 5,492,829 1,020,924 -- 364,697 378,350 562,350 197,653 577,812 2,464,882 2,607,987 2,591,987 127,105 -- 600,981 608,765 608,765 7,784 -- 344,006 340,960 340,960 (3,046) -- 2,549,262 2,618,894 2,618,894 69,632 -- 283,493 283,492 283,493 -- -- 1,886,781 2,100,000 2,036,780 149,999 37,510 278,001 360,118 360,118 82,117 -- 337,667 150,000 347,667 10,000 (1,596,759) -- -- -- -- - 1,065,767 832,300 1,204,372 138,605 -- 1,258,064 1,250,000 1,258,120 56 -- 1,279,839 1,302,814 1,302,814 22,975 - 415,117 539,309 547,799 132,682 - 87,921 98,549 98,549 10,628 -- 289,823 292,208 292,208 2,385 58,506 75,784 75,784 17,278 (981,437) 13,564,807 13,839,530 14,530,660 965,853 (607,510) (563,074) (1,170,584) -- 44,146 500,000 - 91,883 100,000 -- 300,804 300,804 -- -- 2,421,247 - 2,000,000 20,047,754 (1,574,209) 500,000 455,854 100,000 8,117 300,804 -- 1,163,557 1,163,557 900,488 900,488 436,833 5,322,051 2,964,849 2,528,016 18,473,545 23,561,800 22,988,338 4,514,793 115 City of Corpus Christi GENERAL FUND SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES (BUDGET BASIS), COMPARED TO BUDGET YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Actual GAAP Expenditures Personal Materials Contractual Other Capital Services & Supplies Services Charges Outlays Reimbursements Police and municipal court Police Administration 2,513,192 95,987 354,693 1,099,004 Police training 1,263,961 227,303 20,125 211,344 Criminal investigation 6,204,317 202,250 7,142 524,776 Narcotics/ViceInvestigations 2,958,645 101,120 126,390 293,322 Uniformed division 31,461,074 697,810 457,575 6,563,639 Forensics services division 1,310,877 53,713 25,919 86,220 School crossing guards 8,101 -- 172,536 47,956 Parking control 284,986 11,445 174,014 68,580 MetroCom 3,991,177 18,814 448,082 174,772 Police computer support 65,634 11,230 716,848 5,712 9-1-1 call delivery wireline 43,512 3,037 295,411 4,140 9-1-1 call delivery wireless -- 18,611 114,063 11,951 Building maintenance and operations 84,096 73,908 999,388 69,282 Vehicle pound operation 372,458 7,864 1,058,500 85,089 Central information 1,295,251 36,966 26,691 101,991 Criminal intelligence unit 1,062,975 29,029 13,199 54,772 Beach safety 161,355 -- -- -- Police Special Events 127,958 - -- - Animal Control 1,231,428 217,296 348,994 522,918 Low Cost Spay Neuter Clinic 193,978 57,162 16,916 6,144 Code enforcement 1,059,471 62,184 311,847 385,157 Total police 55,694,446 1,925,729 5,688,333 10,316,769 Municipal court Administration 1,175,652 34,912 386,159 717,051 Municipal juvenile court 985,075 14,343 45,175 39,799 Detention facility 1,283,537 11,615 158,526 64,272 City marshals 153,998 15,250 43,093 46,978 Total municipal court 3,598,262 76,120 632,953 868,100 Total police and municipal court 240,215 45,412 285,627 (780,794) (780,794) 59,292,708 2,001,849 6,321,286 11,184,869 285,627 (780,794) Fire and Ambulance Administration and training 612,722 22,816 101,104 379,478 -- -- Fire Safety Education -- -- 5,186 -- -- -- Fire academy training 1,113,583 79,941 30,563 126,555 -- -- Communications 87,536 13,675 59,009 99,516 -- -- Apparatus and shop 312,534 212,703 464,715 23,644 -- -- Stations 37,275,050 519,889 941,191 2,251,549 642,584 (327,472) Fire prevention 1,592,208 21,367 17,346 176,798 -- -- Honor Guard -- -- 80 2,063 -- Life guarding and first response 229,320 27,874 11,193 57,792 42,243 Fire support services 801,098 41,156 3,253 35,929 -- - City ambulance operations 173,359 589,544 609,505 50,780 Total fire and ambulance 42,197,410 1,528,965 2,243,145 3,204,104 684,827 (327,472) (Continued) 116 City of Corpus Christi Adjustments Actual Budget Total Budget Budget Expenditures Basis Basis Original Final Exhibit 6-C (Continued) Variance Final Budget Positive (Negative) 4,062,876 -- 4,062,876 3,899,624 4,001,624 (61,252) 1,722,733 - 1,722,733 1,709,834 1,654,834 (67,899) 6,938,485 - 6,938,485 6,725,421 6,695,421 (243,064) 3,479,477 -- 3,479,477 3,516,924 3,418,924 (60,553) 39,180,098 909,706 40,089,804 38,660,494 39,613,859 (475,945) 1,476,729 - 1,476,729 1,454,134 1,449,134 (27,595) 228,593 -- 228,593 213,881 213,881 (14,712) 539,025 -- 539,025 589,170 569,170 30,145 4,632,845 -- 4,632,845 5,179,287 5,179,287 546,442 18,630 780,794 799,424 692,464 796,759 (2,665) 346,100 346,100 366,477 386,010 39,910 144,625 -- 144,625 275,255 275,255 130,630 1,466,889 -- 1,466,889 1,407,787 1,529,539 62,650 1,523,911 -- 1,523,911 1,114,164 1,484,164 (39,747) 1,460,899 - 1,460,899 1,578,575 1,443,575 (17,324) 1,159,975 -- 1,159,975 1,170,553 1,153,553 (6,422) 161,355 -- 161,355 153,150 153,150 (8,205) 127,958 - 127,958 149,634 149,634 21,676 2,320,636 - 2,320,636 2,332,234 2,340,252 19,616 274,200 -- 274,200 273,429 309,220 35,020 1,864,071 1,864,071 1,891,592 1,934,174 70,103 73,130,110 1,690,500 74,820,610 73,354,083 74,751,419 (69,191) 2,313,774 - 2,313,774 2,184,582 2,891,764 577,990 1,084,392 -- 1,084,392 1,050,089 1,075,589 (8,803) 1,517,950 -- 1,517,950 1,373,626 1,483,327 (34,623) 259,319 - 259,319 577,089 439,089 179,770 5,175,435 - 5,175,435 5,185,386 5,889,769 714,334 78,305,545 1,690,500 79,996,045 78,539,469 80,641,188 645,143 1,116,120 -- 1,116,120 1,139,924 1,229,940 113,820 5,186 -- 5,186 6,120 6,120 934 1,350,642 -- 1,350,642 971,038 979,441 (371,201) 259,736 -- 259,736 262,005 280,005 20,269 1,013,596 -- 1,013,596 988,837 1,088,837 75,241 41,302,791 435,162 41,737,953 41,445,265 42,607,153 869,200 1,807,719 -- 1,807,719 1,672,601 1,672,601 (135,118) 2,143 -- 2,143 4,080 4,080 1,937 368,422 - 368,422 470,794 470,794 102,372 881,436 - 881,436 833,370 832,663 (48,773) 1,423,188 249,792 1,672,980 1,953,460 1,879,100 206,120 49,530,979 684,954 50,215,933 49,747,494 51,050,734 834,801 117 City of Corpus Christi Emergency management Inspections GENERAL FUND SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES (BUDGET BASIS), COMPARED TO BUDGET YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Actual GAAP Expenditures Personal Materials Contractual Other Capital Services & Supplies Services Charges Outlays 151,303 51,697 48,053 159,096 1,619,215 64,789 308,078 467,020 Reimbursements (266,352) Streets Street Lighting -- -- 3,338,558 -- 5,053 (745) Harbor Bridge Lighting -- -- 91,930 -- -- -- Total streets -- - 3,430,488 - 5,053 (745) Solid Waste Solid waste office J.C. Elliot Transfer Station Refuse collection Refuse disposal Brush collection Ellitot Closure/Postclosure exp Graffiti Clean-up Project Cefe Valenzuela landfill operation Total solid waste 572,630 29,776 393,325 208,448 29,680 -- 1,253,950 268,442 322,485 306,432 86,355 (460,000) 3,739,769 880,825 2,103,281 759,408 707,983 -- 75,576 7,795 123,695 18,565 39,229 1,577,987 272,116 531,668 318,598 2,662,057 -- -- 213,457 -- -- 219,161 14,070 3,425 17,292 -- 704,639 65,271 4,801,795 209,694 74,231 8,143,712 1,538,295 8,493,131 1,838,437 3,599,535 (460,000) Health Administration and special programs 497,794 5,318 83,002 225,707 -- T.B. Clinic - Health Department 53,573 33 4,320 -- Immunization 98,868 382 16,671 17,892 -- Vital statistics 103,871 12,257 8,706 11,604 -- Nursing 262,043 4,739 7,114 16,017 -- Environmental health 380,278 16,012 14,842 84,627 -- STD clinic 115,161 215 369 5,796 -- 1115 Wvr Obesity Prevention 176,723 5,568 175,065 557,612 -- Laboratory 169,907 3,757 13,338 11,568 -- Mental health -- -- 58,500 -- -- Health office building 7,955 7,992 185,702 54,132 21,133 Total health 1,866,173 56,240 563,342 989,275 21,133 Parks and recreation Director ofparks and recreation 567,719 6,864 115,084 142,966 - - Park operation 2,168,303 275,208 637,954 1,090,335 228,038 (264,000) Park construction 326,947 116,416 9,211 92,058 -- -- Program services admin 321,177 12,483 10,778 256,119 -- Senior community services 562,275 29,363 400,949 460,014 - P&R priority maint response 115,066 20,835 159 -- 76,263 Beach & Park Code Compliance 149,389 3,608 1,216 -- Athletics 272,414 40,881 168,813 167,057 -- Aquatics 511,361 97,831 131,285 186,397 -- Recreation centers 58,696 44,554 100,529 35,040 -- -- Multicultural center 98,556 5,509 36,528 20,891 -- (131,139) Latchkey program 1,832,524 115,152 95,917 271,184 -- -- Beach maintenance/safety -- 250 -- -- -- Beach parking permits 52,115 13,584 69,243 10,869 31,844 - Beach maintenance and operations 453,171 106,050 440,280 179,652 64,088 (1,133,453) Oso Bay Learning Center 106,375 32,922 23,278 713 6,326 -- Tennis center operations 25,374 14,630 176,297 76,049 -- Corpus Christi Independent School District -- - 23,633 - -- Public Art Maintenance -- -- 17,157 -- -- Tourist district 383,880 59,238 406,990 115,740 48,095 Natatorium -- - 150,206 -- -- Total parks and recreation 8,005,342 995,378 3,015,507 3,105,084 454;654 (1,528,592) Libraries Central 725,741 557,616 216,925 334,681 Anita & W.T. Neyland Branch 318,684 13,237 58,814 81,721 Ben McDonald Branch 280,914 6,889 75,651 92,624 Owen Hopkins Brance 276,348 9,864 34,949 81,445 Janet F. Harte Branch 235,252 11,941 50,181 97,133 Dr. Clotilde P. Garcia Branch 271,020 10,445 71,734 90,181 Total libraries 2,107,959 609,992 508,254 777,785 (Continued) 118 7,984 7,984 City of Corpus Christi Adjustments Actual Budget Total Budget Budget Expenditures Basis Basis Original Final 410,149 2,192,750 (2,192,750) 3,342,866 410,149 469,188 745 3,343,611 Exhibit 6-C (Continued) Variance Final Budget Positive (Negative) 467,688 57,539 3,648,306 4,009,040 91,930 -- 91,930 37,600 94,600 3,434,796 745 3,435,541 1,233,859 (25,508) 1,208,351 1,777,664 1,072,795 2,850,459 8,191,266 1,989,001 10,180,267 264,860 710,131 974,991 5,362,426 (2,079,867) 3,282,559 213,457 -- 213,457 253,948 - 253,948 5,855,630 3,210,406 9,066,036 23,153,110 4,876,958 28,030,068 811,821 57,926 133,813 136,438 289,913 495,759 121,541 914,968 198,570 58,500 276,914 3,496,163 3,685,906 4,103,640 665,429 2,670 668,099 1,354,165 1,392,665 184,314 3,035,594 3,094,137 243,678 10,305,146 10,191,818 11,551 1,056,918 1,074,676 99,685 2,866,867 3,338,867 56,308 318,634 419,691 206,234 271,159 271,159 17,211 8,472,768 9,303,802 237,766 27,681,251 29,086,815 1,056,747 811,821 865,772 869,950 58,129 57,926 83,352 58,135 209 133,813 177,989 137,089 3,276 136,438 144,786 141,786 5,348 289,913 360,341 358,102 68,189 495,759 481,369 495,953 194 121,541 124,948 123,152 1,611 914,968 2,524,224 1,220,937 305,969 198,570 154,778 162,098 (36,472) 58,500 54,000 54,000 (4,500) 276,914 360,926 305,218 28,304 - 3,496,163 5,332,485 3,926,420 430,257 832,633 - 832,633 922,564 871,189 38,556 4,135,838 318,564 4,454,402 4,677,042 4,696,422 242,020 544,632 -- 544,632 694,226 713,007 168,375 600,557 -- 600,557 643,035 698,330 97,773 1,452,601 - 1,452,601 1,441,220 1,462,078 9,477 212,323 -- 212,323 190,332 326,304 113,981 154,213 -- 154,213 162,348 162,348 8,135 649,165 -- 649,165 682,657 682,657 33,492 926,874 -- 926,874 1,004,279 996,279 69,405 238,819 -- 238,819 322,348 322,348 83,529 30,345 131,139 161,484 163,492 163,492 2,008 2,314,777 -- 2,314,777 2,463,034 2,439,034 124,257 250 -- 250 3,950 3,950 3,700 177,655 - 177,655 181,528 237,778 60,123 109,788 1,133,453 1,243,241 1,416,016 1,359,766 116,525 169,614 -- 169,614 423,655 480,020 310,406 292,350 - 292,350 301,795 301,795 9,445 23,633 - 23,633 50,000 50,000 26,367 17,157 -- 17,157 22,100 38,100 20,943 1,013,943 -- 1,013,943 1,058,568 1,126,290 112,347 150,206 - 150,206 150,532 150,532 326 14,047,373 1,583,156 15,630,529 16,974,721 17,281,719 1,651,190 1,842,947 472,456 456,078 402,606 394,507 443,380 4,011,974 1,842,947 472,456 456,078 402,606 394,507 443,380 1,824,899 490,622 412,281 429,136 425,258 442,053 4,011,974 4,024,249 119 1,849,798 6,851 490,622 18,166 424,077 (32,001) 429,136 26,530 424,558 30,051 442,753 (627) 4,060,944 48,970 City of Corpus Christi Museums Museum of Science and History Columbus ships Total museums Debt service Principal retired Interest Total debt service GENERAL FUND SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES (BUDGET BASIS), COMPARED TO BUDGET YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Actual GAAP Expenditures Personal Materials Contractual Other Capital Services & Supplies Services Charges Outlays 1,771 325,479 1,171,277 33,475 -- 33,462 2,425 -- 1,771 358,941 1,173,702 33,475 4,401,551 268,836 4,670,387 Reimbursements Total expenditures 135,043,753 $ 7.084.488 $ 30.859.538 $ 32,028,427 $ 5,092,288 $ (5,239,625) 120 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 6-C (Continued) Variance Adjustments Actual Budget Final Budget Total Budget Budget Positive Expenditures Basis Basis Original Final (Negative) 1,532,002 -- 1,532,002 1,370,375 1,370,375 (161,627) 35,887 -- 35,887 131,852 150,349 114,462 1,567,889 -- 1,567,889 1,502,227 1,520,724 (47,165) 4,401,551 (4,401,551) 268,836 (268,836) 4,670,387 (4,670,387) $ 204,868,869 $ 398,967 $ 205,267,836 $ 211.518.790 121 $ 215,128,210 $ 9,860,374 City of Corpus Christi GENERAL FUND (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) SCHEDULE OF REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (BUDGET BASIS), COMPARED TO BUDGET YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Budget Actual Adjustments GAAP Budget Original Final Basis Basis Licenses and permits Beer and liquor licenses $ 115,000 $ 115,000 $ 93,942 $ Electricians licenses and exam fees 36,000 36,000 35,805 House mover licenses 250 250 266 Building permits 3,148,800 3,148,800 3,128,535 Electrical permits 200,000 200,000 204,821 Plumbing permits 380,000 380,000 356,097 Mechanical permits 120,000 120,000 141,417 Certificate of occupancy fee 45,000 45,000 33,712 Plan review fee 920,000 920,000 1,182,080 Mechanical registration fees 25,000 25,000 22,895 Plumber registration -- -- (135) Lawn irrigator registration 4,800 4,800 4,455 Backflow prey. assembly tester 8,500 8,500 12,395 Driveway permit fee 15,000 15,000 16,178 Street cut permits -- -- 672 Street easement closure fees 10,500 10,500 17,789 Backflow prey device filling fee 80,000 80,000 105,080 Research and survey fee 8,000 8,000 7,555 Deferment Agreement fee 9,000 9,000 12,097 Construction documents fee 500 500 355 Billboard fee 14,000 14,000 4,042 Forfeited House Mover Deposit -- -- 10,500 House moving route permits 850 850 549 Oversize load permits 20,000 20,000 19,597 Total licenses and permits 5,161,200 5,161,200 5,410,699 Charges for services General governmental services Zoning fees 150,000 150,000 139,722 Platting fees 70,000 70,000 69,387 Board of Adjustment appeal fees 4,000 4,000 6,630 GIS Sales 200 200 12 Total charges for services 224,200 224,200 215,751 Earnings on investments 13,510 Miscellaneous Sale of city property 7,607 Mis cellaneous 6,074 Total miscellaneous revenue 13,681 Reimbursements Interdepartmental Total revenues Transfers in General Fund Total transfers in Transfers out Administrative Service Charge Transfers for capital replacement Total transfers out Total other sources Total revenues and other sources 948,888 948,888 948,888 6,334,288 6,334,288 501,158 501,158 (247,552) (50,000) (297,552) 203,606 5,653,641 948,888 501,158 500,000 501,158 500,000 (247,552) (247,552) (50,000) (50,000) (297,552) (297,552) 203,606 202,448 $ 6,537,894 $ 6,537,894 $ 5,856,089 $ 948,888 Note: Development Services is a part of General Fund but has its own budget. 122 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 6-D Variance Actual Final Budget Budget Positive Basis (Negative) $ 93,942 $ (21,058) 35,805 (195) 266 16 3,128,535 (20,265) 204,821 4,821 356,097 (23,903) 141,417 21,417 33,712 (11,288) 1,182,080 262,080 22,895 (2,105) (135) (135) 4,455 (345) 12,395 3,895 16,178 1,178 672 672 17,789 7,289 105,080 25,080 7,555 (445) 12,097 3,097 355 (145) 4,042 (9,958) 10,500 10,500 549 (301) 19,597 (403) 5,410,699 249,499 139,722 (10,278) 69,387 (613) 6,630 2,630 12 (188) 215,751 (8,449) 13,510 13,510 7,607 7,607 6,074 6,074 13,681 13,681 948,888 6,602,529 268,241 500,000 (1,158) 500,000 (1,158) (247,552) (50,000) (297,552) 202,448 (1,159) $ 6,804,977 $ 267,082 123 City of Corpus Christi GENERAL FUND (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES (BUDGET BASIS), COMPARED TO BUDGET YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Actual GAAP Expenditures Personal Materials Contractual Other Total Services & Supplies Services Charges Reimbursements Expenditures General government Development Services administration $ 678,566 $ 7,155 $ 427,893 $ 561,145 $ (78,000) $ 1,596,759 Engineering services Special services Process management Total engineering services Other expenditures Reserve appropriations Total general government Inspections Total expenditures 887,992 533,102 1,421,094 3,549 11,432 14,981 267,789 8,050 275,839 29,952 33,254 63,206 (581,772) 607,510 (22,764) 563,074 (604,536) 1,170,584 2,099,660 22,136 703,732 624,351 (682,536) 2,767,343 1,619,215 64,789 308,078 467,020 (266,352) 2,192,750 $ 3,718,875 $ 86,925 $ 1,011,810 $ 1,091,371 $ (948,888) $ 4,960,093 Note: Development Services is a part of General Fund but has its own budget. 124 City of Corpus Christi Adjustments Actual Budget Budget Budget Basis Basis Original Final Exhibit 6-E Variance Final Budget Positive (Negative) $ 78,000 $ 1,674,759 $ 1,530.775 $ 3,195,099 $ 1,520,340 581,772 1,189,282 22,764 585,838 604,536 1,775,120 682,536 1,233,901 1,432,212 242,930 797,620 584,132 (1,706) 2,031,521 2,016,344 241,224 865 865 865 3,449,879 3,563,161 266,352 2,459,102 2,615,011 5,212,308 1,762,429 2,696,202 237,100 $ 948,888 $ 5,908,981 $ 6,178,172 $ 7,908,510 $ 1,999,529 125 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 Debt Service Fund Debt Service Fund — Also known as the Interest and Sinking Fund. Was established to account for funds needed to make principal and interest payments on outstanding bonds when due. CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 City of Corpus Christi DEBT SERVICE FUND BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 10,776,370 Receivables Taxes 1,787,737 Miscellaneous 2,775 Allowance for uncollectibles (914,627) Net receivables 875,885 Total assets $ 11,652,255 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Liabilities Accounts payable $ 1,611 Taxes 873,110 Total liabilities 874,721 Fund balance Committed Debt service 10,777,534 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 11,652,255 128 Exhibit 7-A City of Corpus Christi DEBT SERVICE FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET (GAAP BASIS) AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Budget Original Final Actual Exhibit 7-B Variance Final Budget Positive (Negative) Revenues Ad valorem taxes $ 33,855,000 $ 33,855,000 $ 34,181,412 $ 326,412 Eamings on investments 40,000 40,000 47,112 7,112 Payments from Texas State Aquarium 332,936 332,936 328,276 (4,660) Total revenues 34,227,936 34,227,936 34,556,800 328,864 Expenditures Debt service Principal retirement 24,787,773 24,787,773 24,705,189 82,584 Interest 15,159,855 15,159,855 14,881,805 278,050 Bond issue cost -- 42,093 12,729 29,364 Paying agent fees 20,000 20,000 39,317 (19,317) Total expenditures 39,967,628 40,009,721 39,639,040 370,681 Deficiency of revenues under expenditures (5,739,692) (5,781,785) (5,082,240) 699,545 Other financing sources Refunding bonds issued 2,137,681 2,137,681 Payment to escrow agent for refunded bonds (2,137,681) (2,137,681) Transfers in from General fund 3,433,653 4,533,653 4,533,653 Airport fund 49,850 49,850 49,850 Hotel occupancy tax fund 2,194,400 2,194,400 2,194,400 Visitors facilities fund 187,124 187,124 187,124 Facilities maintenance fund 234,357 234,357 234,357 Total other financing sources 6,099,384 7,199,384 7,199,384 Net change in fund balance 359,692 1,417,599 2,117,144 699,545 Fund balance at beginning of year 7,038,940 8,660,390 8,660,390 Fund balance at end of year $ 7,398,632 $ 10,077,989 $ 10,777,534 $ 699,545 129 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 Non -major Governmental Funds CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 City of Corpus Christi NON -MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Debt Service Fund Exhibit 8-A Corpus Christi Special Capital Business and Revenue Projects Job Development Funds Funds Corporation Eliminations Total ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 91,466,208 $ 59,472,272 $ 6,153,453 $ -- $ 157,091,933 Receivables, net of allowance for uncollectibles 22,364,163 -- -- -- 22,364,163 Inventories 362,863 -- -- -- 362,863 Prepaid items 286,607 -- -- -- 286,607 Total assets LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES $ 114,479,841 $ 59,472,272 $ 6,153,453 $ -- $ 180,105,566 Liabilities Accounts payable $ 1,996,221 $ 49,322 $ -- $ -- $ 2,045,543 Accrued liabilities 669,534 -- -- -- 669,534 Contractor interest and retainage payable 500,769 515,113 -- -- 1,015,882 Deposits 577,103 -- -- -- 577,103 Due to other funds 1,029,019 -- -- -- 1,029,019 Due to other governmental agencies 428,971 -- -- -- 428,971 Advance from other funds -- 500,000 -- -- 500,000 Unearned revenues 2,651,756 -- -- -- 2,651,756 Total liabilities 7,853,373 1,064,435 -- -- 8,917,808 Fund balances Nonspendable Inventory 362,863 -- -- -- 362,863 Prepaid items 230,961 -- -- -- 230,961 Total nonspendable 593,824 -- -- -- 593,824 Restricted Tourism (HOT) 6,105,090 -- -- -- 6,105,090 Public education governmental cable tv 1,766,301 -- -- -- 1,766,301 Traffic safety programs 752,809 -- -- -- 752,809 Law enforcement 306,744 -- -- -- 306,744 Fire and ambulance 4,764 -- -- -- 4,764 CDBG projects 243,762 -- -- -- 243,762 Libraries 28 -- -- -- 28 Community enrichment 7,010 -- -- -- 7,010 Parks and recreation 2,629,415 -- -- -- 2,629,415 Infrastructure 1,696,446 -- -- -- 1,696,446 Municipal Court building security 106,316 -- -- -- 106,316 Muncipal Court technology 119,707 -- -- -- 119,707 Juvenile Court case manager 364,332 -- -- -- 364,332 Loans 14,086,807 -- -- -- 14,086,807 (Continued) 132 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 8-A NON -MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS (Continued) COMBINING BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Debt Service Fund Corpus Christi Special Capital Business and Revenue Projects Job Development Funds Funds Corporation Eliminations Total Crime control and prevention 5,441,581 -- -- -- 5,441,581 Seawall improvement 18,166,293 17,742,678 1,340,610 -- 37,249,581 Arena facility 17,576,113 100,385 2,905,475 -- 20,581,973 Economic development 6,642,463 -- 1,907,368 -- 8,549,831 North Padre Island development 3,637,431 2,363,453 -- -- 6,000,884 Downtown development 2,253,569 -- -- -- 2,253,569 Debt service 1,344,500 -- -- -- 1,344,500 Capital projects -- 37,679,256 -- 37,679,256 Total restricted 83,251,481 57,885,772 6,153,453 -- 147,290,706 Committed Parking improvements 241,787 -- -- -- 241,787 Streets 18,669,797 -- -- -- 18,669,797 Sister City programs 1,165 -- -- -- 1,165 Park projects 3,265 -- -- -- 3,265 Permanent art projects 260,427 -- -- -- 260,427 Development projects 1,106,310 -- -- -- 1,106,310 Local Emergency Planning Committee 60,714 -- -- -- 60,714 Capital projects -- 656,146 -- -- 656,146 Total committed 20,343,465 656,146 -- -- 20,999,611 Assigned Visitors facilities 2,291,813 -- -- -- 2,291,813 Housing 87,000 -- -- -- 87,000 Industrial development 68,775 -- -- -- 68,775 Capital projects -- 62,867 -- -- 62,867 Total assigned 2,447,588 62,867 -- -- 2,510,455 Unassigned (9,890) (196,948) -- (206,838) Total fund balances 106,626,468 58,407,837 6,153,453 -- 171,187,758 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 114,479,841 $ 59,472,272 $ 6,153,453 $ -- $ 180,105,566 133 City of Corpus Christi NON -MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Revenues Taxes and business fees Licenses and permits Intergovernmental Grants Charges for services Fines and forfeitures Contributions and donations Earnings on investments Interest on loans Sale of city property Miscellaneous Total revenues Expenditures Current General government Police and municipal court Fire and ambulance Emergency management Streets Health Parks and recreation Libraries Community enrichment Community development Convention and visitors activities Capital projects Debt service Principal retirement Interest Bond issuance cost Paying agent fees Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Proceeds from the issuance of capital leases General obligation bonds issued Premium on bonds sold Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) Net change in fund balances Fund balances at beginning of year Fund balances at end of year Special Revenue Funds Capital Projects Funds $ 48,468,671 $ 40,586 2,427,736 12,740,119 17,307,002 2,217,681 1,124,031 293,229 59,282 46,779 890,000 85,615,116 134,589 10,453,798 743,812 188,360 23,926,895 2,073,768 3,095,843 50,706 2,407,841 11,115,966 14,625,022 3,830,996 1,428,332 469,067 5,694 74,550,689 11,064,427 671,670 16,441,172 (21,802,317) (4,689,475) 151,439 84,364 235,803 503,326 12,236,568 59,601 12,799,495 (12,563,692) 6,948,234 748,513 9,635,193 Debt Service Fund Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation 20,676 20,676 5,790,000 2,664,969 2,000 8,456,969 (8,436,293) 9,254,291 17,331,940 9,254,291 6,374,952 4,768,248 100,251,516 53,639,589 817,998 5,335,455 Eliminations (18,889,484) 18,889,484 $ 106,626,468 $ 58,407,837 $ 6,153,453 $ 134 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 8-B Total $ 48,468,671 40,586 2,427,736 12,740,119 17,307,002 2,217,681 1,124,031 465,344 59,282 46,779 974,364 85,871,595 637,915 10,453,798 743,812 188,360 23,926,895 2,073,768 3,095,843 50,706 2,407,841 11,115,966 14,625,022 16,067,564 7,218,332 3,134,036 59,601 7,694 95,807,153 (9,935,558) 671,670 6,948,234 748,513 16,441,172 (2,912,833) 21,896,756 11,961,198 159,226,560 $ 171,187,758 135 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 Special Revenue Funds Special Revenue Funds Special Revenue Funds are used to account for resources allocated to specific purposes. A special revenue fund continues in existence as long as governmental resources are allocated to its specific purpose. Visitors Facilities Fund This fund records revenues and expenditures related to the Convention Center, Arena, and other tourist -related activities. Hotel Occupancy Tax Fund This fund accounts for revenues and expenditures of the hotel/motel occupancy taxes. Public Education and Government Fund (PEG) This fund accounts for cable franchise revenues and PEG facilities and equipment expenditures. The fund is a result of the cable franchise converting from a local franchise to state franchise in 2012. The funds are restricted by both state and federal law for PEG facilities and equipment. Red Light Photo Enforcement Fund This fund records revenues and expenditures related to red light camera violations. Parking Improvement Fund This fund records a portion of Parking Meter revenue committed to be used for parking improvements. Street Maintenance Fund This fund records Street Maintenance Fees and other Streets revenue committed for use to manage, maintain, and develop the street system. Federal/State Grants Fund This fund accounts for grant programs. Municipal Court Fees Fund This fund records revenues and expenditures related to fees designated for Municipal Court Building Security, Technology, and Juvenile Case Managers. Community Enrichment Fund This fund records revenues and expenditures for community enrichment programs and activities not in the General Fund. Infrastructure Fund This fund records revenues and expenditures related to developers' participation in the enhancement of streets and roads in neighborhood subdivisions. Local Emergency Planning Committee This fund was established by Interlocal Agreement between the County of Nueces, City of Corpus Christi, and the Port of Corpus Christi Authority for the purposes of implementing the federally mandated plan and required training under the Community Right -To -Know Act. Corpus Christi Community Improvement Corporation This fund accounts for revenues and expenditures of the Corpus Christi Community Improvement Corporation. Corpus Christi Housing Finance Corporation This fund accounts for revenues and expenditures of the Corpus Christi Housing Finance Corporation. Corpus Christi Industrial Development Corporation This fund accounts for revenues and expenditures of the Corpus Christi Industrial Development Corporation. Corpus Christi Crime Control and Prevention District This fund is a public non-profit corporation created under State law to provide for funding of public safety programs. Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation This fund is a public non-profit corporation created under Section 4A of the Development Corporation Act of the State of Texas, to provide funding of voter approved capital improvement programs for the seawall, the arena, and the baseball stadium; for the promotion and development of new and expanded business enterprises; and for assisting qualified citizens with affordable housing. North Padre Island Development Corporation - This fund accounts for the facilitation of development of land within the boundaries of the Tax Increment Zone No. 2. The fund is utilized for Packery Channel development and improvement projects within the Zone. Reinvestment Zone # 3, City of Corpus Christi, Texas - This fund accounts for the facilitation of development of land within the boundaries of the Tax Increment Zone No. 3. The fund is utilized for downtown development and improvement projects within the Zone. CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 City of Corpus Christi SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Public Hotel Education and Redlight Visitors Occupancy Governmental Photo Parking Facilities Tax Cable TV Enforcement Improvement ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 3,894,825 $ 4,658,976 $ 1,577,988 $ 1,286,469 S 241,787 Receivables Accounts 1,510,916 1,908,138 188,313 Property leases -- Mortgages and loans Demolition liens Special assessments Intergovernmental Miscellaneous -- Allowance for uncollectibles (242,483) Net receivables 1,268,433 1,908,138 188,313 Inventories 109,124 Prepaid items 230,961 Total assets $ 5,503,343 $ 6,567,114 $ 1,766,301 $ 1,286,469 $ 241,787 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Liabilities Accounts payable $ 853,273 $ 454,230 $ $ 100,396 $ Accrued liabilities 304,305 -- 7,157 Contractor interest and retainage payable -- 7,794 -- Deposits 1,350 -- Due to other funds -- -- Due to other governmental agencies 426,107 Unearned revenues Demolition liens and other Asset seizure and forfeiture Grants Texas Commission on Environmental Quality -- Other 1,712,517 Total unearned revenues 1,712,517 Total liabilities 2,871,445 462,024 533,660 (Continued) 138 City of Corpus Christi Municipal Street Federal/ Court Community Maintenance State Grants Fees Enrichment Infrastructure Exhibit 9-A Local Emergency Planning Committee $ 17,217,746 $ $ 613,293 $ 3,585,624 $ 1,696,446 $ 91,875 1,341,349 1,732 803,354 -- 4,777 844,510 3,156,057 -- 13,704 (126,862) (763,534) 2,060,729 3,214,358 253,739 $ 19,532,214 $ 3,214,358 $ 613,293 $ 3,585,624 $ 1,696,446 $ 91,875 $ 77,061 $ 282,385 $ 20,356 $ 139,350 84,869 2,502 -- 392,267 89,562 -- 11,146 -- 214,130 -- 1,029,019 -- 2,784 80 44,896 31,901 441,527 14,763 533,087 608,678 2,235,836 22,938 11,146 $ $ 854 1,397 28,910 31,161 City of Corpus Christi Fund balances Nonspendable Inventory Prepaid items Total nonspendable Restricted Tourism (HOT) Public education governmental cable tv Traffic safety programs Law enforcement Fire and ambulance CDBG projects Libraries Community enrichment Parks and recreation Infrastructure Municipal Court building security Muncipal Court technology Juvenile Court case manager Loans Crime control and prevention Seawall improvement Arena facility Economic development North Padre Island development Downtown development Debt service Total restricted Committed Parking improvements Streets Sister City programs Park projects Permanent art projects Development projects Local Emergency Planning Committee Total committed Assigned Visitors facilities Housing Industrial development Total assigned Unassigned Total fund balances Total liabilities and fund balances (Continued) SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Public Hotel Education and Redlight Visitors Occupancy Governmental Photo Parking Facilities Tax Cable TV EnforcementImprovement 109,124 230,961 340,085 2,291,813 2,291,813 2,631,898 6,105,090 6,105,090 1,766,301 -- 752,809 1,766,301 752,809 6,105,090 1,766,301 241,787 241,787 752,809 241,787 $ 5,503,343 $ 6,567,114 $ 1,766,301 $ 1,286,469 $ 241,787 140 City of Corpus Christi Municipal Street Federal/ Court Community Maintenance State Grants Fees Enrichment 253,739 253,739 18,669,797 18,669,797 18,923,536 $ 19,532,214 306,744 4,764 243,762 28 7,010 426,104 106,316 119,707 364,332 988,412 590,355 (9,890) 2,203,311 Infrastructure 1,696,446 2,203,311 1,696,446 1,165 3,265 260,427 1,106,310 1,371,167 978,522 590,355 3,574,478 Exhibit 9-A (Continued) Local Emergency Planning Committee 60,714 60,714 1,696,446 60,714 $ 3,214,358 $ 613,293 $ 3,585,624 $ 1,696,446 $ 91,875 City of Corpus Christi SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Community Housing Industrial Crime Control Business and Improvement Finance Development and Prevention Job Development CorporationCorporation Corporation DistrictCorporation ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 3,198,011 $ 86,000 $ 68,775 $ 5,153,917 $ 40,856,666 Receivables Accounts 407,152 Property leases -- -- Mortgages and loans 13,590,749 Demolition liens -- Special assessments -- -- Intergovernmental 516,509 1,569,726 Miscellaneous -- 89 -- Allowance for uncollectibles (2,360,033) -- Net receivables 11,230,716 407,152 516,598 1,569,726 Inventories Prepaid items Total assets LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES 55,646 $ 14,428,727 $ 493,152 $ 68,775 $ 5,670,515 $ 42,482,038 Liabilities Accounts payable $ 9,207 $ Accrued liabilities -- Contractor interest and retainage payable -- Deposits 332,713 Due to other funds -- Due to other governmental agencies Unearned revenues Demolition liens and other Asset seizure and forfeitures Grants Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Other 406,152 Total unearned revenues 406,152 Total liabilities 341,920 406,152 (Continued) 142 $ 98,980 $ 97,169 129,954 -- 228,934 97,169 City of Corpus Christi North Padre Island Development Reinvestment Corporation Zone #3 Eliminations Total $ 4,984,241 $ 2,253,569 $ $ 91,466,208 $ 4,984,241 $ 2,253,569 $ 2,310 $ 2,310 5,355,868 1,732 13,590,749 803,354 4,777 6,086,802 13,793 (3,492,912) 22,364,163 362,863 286,607 $ $ 114,479,841 $ 1,996,221 669,534 500,769 577,103 1,029,019 428,971 44,896 31,901 441,527 14,763 2,118,669 2,651,756 7,853,373 143 Exhibit 9-A (Continued) City of Corpus Christi SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Community Housing Industrial Crime Control Business and Improvement Finance Development and Prevention Job Development CorporationCorporationCorporation DistrictCorporation Fund balances Nonspendable Inventory Prepaid items Total nonspendable Restricted Tourism (HOT) Public education governmental cable tv Traffic safety programs Law enforcement Fire and ambulance CDBG projects Libraries Community enrichment Parks and recreation Infrastructure Municipal Court building security Muncipal Court technology Juvenile Court case manager -- Loans 14,086,807 Crime control and prevention -- 5,441,581 Seawall improvement -- 18,166,293 Arena facility 17,576,113 Economic development 6,642,463 North Padre Island development Downtown development Debt service Total restricted 14,086,807 5,441,581 42,384,869 Committed Parking improvements Streets Sister City programs Park projects Permanent art projects Development projects Local Emergency Planning Committee Total committed Assigned Visitors facilities -- Housing 87,000 Industrial development -- 68,775 Total assigned 87,000 68,775 Unassigned -- Total fund balances 14,086,807 87,000 68,775 5,441,581 42,384,869 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 14,428,727 $ 493,152 $ 68,775 $ 5,670,515 $ 42,482,038 144 City of Corpus Christi North Padre Island Development Reinvestment Corporation Zone #3 Eliminations Total 3,637,431 -- 2,253,569 1,344,500 -- 362,863 230,961 593,824 6,105,090 1,766,301 752,809 306,744 4,764 243,762 28 7,010 2,629,415 1,696,446 106,316 119,707 364,332 14,086,807 5,441,581 18,166,293 17,576,113 6,642,463 3,637,431 2,253,569 1,344,500 4,981,931 2,253,569 83,251,481 241,787 18,669,797 1,165 3,265 260,427 1,106,310 60,714 20,343,465 2,291,813 87,000 68,775 2,447,588 (9,890) 4,981,931 2,253,569 106,626,468 $ 4,984,241 $ 2,253,569 $ $ 114,479,841 145 Exhibit 9-A (Continued) City of Corpus Christi SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Revenues Taxes and business fees Licenses and permits Intergovernmental Grants Charges for services Fines and forfeitures Contributions and donations Earnings on investments Interest on loans Sale of City property Miscellaneous Total revenues Public Hotel Education and Redlight Visitors Occupancy Governmental Photo Parking Facilities Tax Cable TV Enforcement Improvement 4,417,120 $ 15,110,411 $ 748,370 $ 2,640 7,514 4,419,760 3,711 15,117,925 752,081 1,922,798 2,828 108,600 500 1,925,626 109,100 Expenditures Current General government -- -- 134,589 -- -- Police and municipal court -- -- -- 1,588,601 -- Fire and ambulance -- -- -- -- -- Emergency management -- -- -- -- -- Streets -- -- -- -- 30,000 Health -- -- Parks and recreation -- 1,133,454 Libraries -- -- Community enrichment -- 881,988 Community development -- -- Convention and visitors activities 4,684,436 9,940,586 Capital projects 104,443 141,233 57,505 -- -- Debt service Principal retirement -- -- -- -- -- Interest -- -- -- -- -- Paying agent fees Total expenditures 4,788,879 12,097,261 192,094 1,588,601 30,000 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures (369,119) 3,020,664 559,987 337,025 79,100 Other financing sources (uses) Capital leases -- -- -- -- -- Transfers in 1,460,719 -- -- -- -- Transfers out (338,675) (2,207,220) -- — -- Total other fmancing sources (uses) 1,122,044 (2,207,220) Net change in fund balance 752,925 813,444 559,987 337,025 79,100 Fund balances at beginning of year 1,878,973 5,291,646 1,206,314 415,784 162,687 Fund balances at end of year $ 2,631,898 $ 6,105,090 $ 1,766,301 $ 752,809 $ 241,787 (Continued) 146 City of Corpus Christi Municipal Street Federal/ Court Community Maintenance State Grants Fees Enrichment $ -- $ 40,586 -- 2,427,736 -- 844,510 11,067,639 12,349,009 365,360 42,734 1,873 19,462 -- 6,764 174,613 15,730,801 23,896,895 1,124,357 598,332 37,067 294,883 Infrastructure Exhibit 9-B Local Emergency Planning Committee 677,898 334,182 96,114 1,813 9,205 4,602 234 8,793 -- -- 1,036 11,609,485 296,696 1,942,052 743,812 69,534 2,073,768 1,962,321 50,706 1,503,105 1,460,551 1,707,390 25,656,651 11,513,239 (9,925,850) 96,246 671,670 -- 16,017,954 209,469 (637,561) 16,689,624 (428,092) 6,763,774 (331,846) 12,159,762 1,310,368 $ 18,923,536 $ 978,522 374,130 696,932 338,784 96,348 68 235,414 334,181 374,130 235,482 (77,434) 461,450 12,820 12,820 (77,434) 474,270 667,789 3,100,208 118,826 334,181 118,826 4,603 (22,478) (3,295) (3,295) 1,308 (22,478) 1,695,138 83,192 $ 590,355 $ 3,574,478 $ 1,696,446 $ 60,714 City of Corpus Christi SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Revenues Taxes and business fees Licenses and permits Intergovernmental Grants Charges for services Fines and forfeitures Contributions and donations Earnings on investments Interest on loans Sale of City property Miscellaneous Total revenue Expenditures Current General government Police and municipal court Fire and ambulance Emergency management Streets Health Parks and recreation Libraries Community enrichment Community development Convention and visitors activities Capital projects Debt service Principal retirement Interest Paying agent fees Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Community Housing Industrial Crime Control Business and Improvement Finance Development and Prevention Job Development Corporation Corporation Corporation DistrictCorporation $ $ $ 7,168,860 $ 21,874,668 827,970 -- 60,600 10,837 5,000 292 3 59,282 -- 707,587 1,605,968 65,603 6,313 14,143 195,405 18,524 7,207,840 22,070,073 6,549,015 2,092,260 16,669 -- -- 7,546,486 2,092,260 16,669 (486,292) 48,934 126,473 6,675,488 7,546,486 532,352 14,523,587 Other financing sources (uses) Capital leases -- -- -- -- -- Transfers in -- -- -- -- -- Transfers out -- -- -- -- (18,201,261) Total other financing sources (uses) -- -- -- -- (18,201,261) Net change in fund balances (486,292) 48,934 -- 532,352 (3,677,674) Fund balances at beginning of year 14,573,099 38,066 68,775 4,909,229 46,062,543 Fund balances at end of year $ 14,086,807 $ 87,000 $ 68,775 $ 5,441,581 $ 42,384,869 148 City of Corpus Christi North Padre Island Development Reinvestment Corporation Zone #3 Eliminations Total $ 2,880,930 $ 685,432 $ -- $ 48,468,671 40,586 2,427,736 12,740,119 17,307,002 2,217,681 1,124,031 2 5,730 — 293,229 59,282 46,779 890,000 2,880,932 691,162 22,748 830,000 432,000 5,694 1,290,442 1,590,490 691,162 (1,672,751) (1,672,751) 85,615,116 134,589 10,453,798 743,812 188,360 23,926,895 2,073,768 3,095,843 50,706 2,407,841 11,115,966 14,625,022 3,830,996 1,428,332 469,067 5,694 74,550,689 11,064,427 671,670 (1,259,790) 16,441,172 (1,344) 1,259,790 (21,802,317) (1,344) -- (4,689,475) (82,261) 689,818 6,374,952 5,064,192 1,563,751 — 100,251,516 $ 4,981,931 $ 2,253,569 $ $ 106,626,468 149 Exhibit 9-B (Continued) City of Corpus Christi VISITORS FACILITIES FUND BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments Receivables Accounts Allowance for uncollectibles Net receivables $ 3,894,825 1,510,916 (242,483) 1,268,433 Inventories 109,124 Prepaid Items 230,961 Total assets $ 5,503,343 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Liabilities Accounts payable $ 853,273 Accrued liabilities 304,305 Deposits 1,350 Unearned revenues 1,712,517 Total liabilities 2,871,445 Fund balance Nonspendable Inventory 109,124 Prepaid items 230,961 Total nonspendable 340,085 Restricted Assigned Visitors facilities 2,291,813 Total fund balance 2,631,898 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 5,503,343 150 Exhibit 10-A City of Corpus Christi VISITORS FACILITIES FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET (GAAP BASIS) AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Revenues Arena Convention center services Bayfront rentals, events & contract Total charges for services Earnings on investments Total revenues Expenditures Current Arena Arena maintenance/improvements Arena marketing/co-promotion Auditorium/convention center Bayfront Arts and Science Park Cultural facility maintenance Uncollectible accounts Other Capital projects Total expenditures Deficiency of revenues under expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources Net change in fund balance Fund balance beginning of year Fund balance end of year Budget Original $ 2,656,893 2,335,375 76,270 5,068,538 Final $ 2,656,893 2,335,375 76,270 Actual Variance Final Budget Positive (Negative) $ 1,812,677 $ (844,216) 2,494,719 159,344 109,724 33,454 5,068,538 4,417,120 (651,418) 2,640 2,640 5,068,538 5,068,538 4,419,760 (648,778) 3,293,863 350,000 500,000 1,171,226 869,273 144,589 10,200 6,339,151 (1,270,613) 1,426,970 (338,675) 1,088,295 (182,318) 320,339 3,293,863 254,557 565,000 1,171,226 869,273 160,899 10,200 95,443 6,420,461 (1,351,923) 1,426,970 (338,675) 1,088,295 (263,629) 2,614,823 679,040 70,109 184,448 385,000 180,000 707,195 464,031 830,940 38,333 53,787 107,112 22,582 (22,582) 10,200 104,443 (9,000) 4,788,879 1,631,582 (369,119) 982,804 1,460,719 33,749 (338,675) - 1,122,044 33,749 752,925 1,016,553 1,878,973 1,878,973 S 138,021 $ 1,615,344 $ 2,631,898 $ 1,016,553 151 Exhibit 10-B City of Corpus Christi HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments Receivables Accounts $ 4,658,976 1,908,138 Total assets $ 6,567,114 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Liabilities Accounts payable $ 454,230 Contractor interest and retainage payable 7,794 Total liabilities 462,024 Fund balance Restricted Tourism (HOT) 6,105,090 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 6,567,114 152 Exhibit 11-A City of Corpus Christi HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET (GAAP BASIS) AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Budget Original Variance Final Budget Positive Final Actual (Negative) Revenues Hotel occupancy tax $ 11,724,012 $ 11,724,012 $ 11,752,936 $ 28,924 Hotel occupancy tax -Convention expansion 3,349,549 3,349,549 3,357,475 7,926 Total hotel occupancy taxes 15,073,561 15,073,561 15,110,411 36,850 Eamings on investments 500 500 7,514 7,014 Total revenues 15,074,061 15,074,061 15,117,925 43,864 Expenditures Current Parks and recreation Beach cleaning 1,607,000 1,607,000 1,133,454 473,546 Community enrichment Art Museum of South Texas 340,000 340,000 340,000 Multicultural services support 131,139 131,139 131,139 -- Texas Amateur Athletic Federation 20,000 20,000 -- 20,000 Arts grants and projects 200,000 272,500 177,514 94,986 Harbor Playhouse 13,335 13,335 13,335 -- Tourist area amenities 200,000 200,000 -- 200,000 Museum Marketing 25,000 25,000 25,000 -- Baseball stadium 175,000 175,000 175,000 Botanical Gardens 20,000 20,000 20,000 Convention and visitors activities Convention center/auditorium 3,200,000 3,200,000 3,200,000 -- Convention center maintenance 5,400,000 5,744,668 1,542,192 4,202,476 Convention and Visitors Bureau -convention promotion 4,960,000 4,960,000 4,959,742 258 Convention events 260,000 260,000 238,652 21,348 Miscellaneous 22,000 22,000 -- 22,000 Reserve appropriation 100,000 100,000 -- 100,000 Capital projects -- -- 141,233 (141,233) Total expenditures 16,673,474 17,090,642 12,097,261 4,993,381 Excess of revenues over expenditures (1,599,413) (2,016,581) 3,020,664 5,037,245 Other financing sources (uses) Transfers out (2,194,400) (2,194,400) (2,207,220) (12,820) Net change in fund balance (3,793,813) (4,210,981) 813,444 5,024,425 Fund balance at beginning of year 5,081,752 5,291,646 5,291,646 Fund balance at end of year $ 1,287,939 $ 1,080,665 $ 6,105,090 $ 5,024,425 153 Exhibit 11-B City of Corpus Christi PUBLIC EDUCATION AND GOVERNMENTAL CABLE TV FUND BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 1,577,988 Receivables Accounts 188,313 Total assets LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE $ 1,766,301 Liabilities $ Fund balance Restricted Public education governmental cable tv programs 1,766,301 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 1,766,301 154 Exhibit 12-A City of Corpus Christi PUBLIC EDUCATION AND GOVERNMENTAL CABLE TV FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BUDGET (GAAP BASIS) AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Variance Budget Final Budget Positive Original Final Actual (Negative) Revenues Taxes and business fees $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 748,370 $ 148,370 Earnings on investments -- -- 3,711 3,711 Total revenues 600,000 600,000 752,081 152,081 Expenditures Current General government 159,000 159,000 134,589 24,411 Capital projects 1,339,609 1,398,909 57,505 1,341,404 Total expenditures 1,498,609 1,557,909 192,094 1,365,815 Net change in fund balance (898,609) (957,909) 559,987 1,517,896 Fund balance at beginning of year 1,206,314 1,206,314 Fund balance at end of year $ (898,609) $ 248,405 $ 1,766,301 $ 1,517,896 155 Exhibit 12-B City of Corpus Christi REDLIGHT PHOTO ENFORCEMENT FUND BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 1,286,469 Total assets $ 1,286,469 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Liabilities Accounts payable $ 100,396 Accrued liabilities 7,157 Due to other governmental agencies 426,107 Total liabilities 533,660 Fund balance Restricted Traffic safety programs 752,809 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 1,286,469 156 Exhibit 13-A City of Corpus Christi REDLIGHT PHOTO ENFORCEMENT FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BUDGET (GAAP BASIS) AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Variance Budget Final Budget Positive Original Final Actual (Negative) Revenues Fines and forfeitures $ 1,823,688 $ 1,823,688 $ 1,922,798 $ 99,110 Earnings on investments -- -- 2,828 2,828 Total revenues 1,823,688 1,823,688 1,925,626 101,938 Expenditures Current Police and municipal court 1,858,832 1,858,832 1,588,601 270,231 Net change in fund balance (35,144) (35,144) 337,025 372,169 Fund balance at beginning of year 400,993 269,194 415,784 146,590 Fund balance at end of year $ 365,849 $ 234,050 $ 752,809 $ 518,759 157 Exhibit 13-B City of Corpus Christi PARKING IMPROVEMENT FUND BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 241,787 Total assets $ 241,787 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Liabilities $ Fund balance Committed Parking improvements 241,787 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 241,787 158 Exhibit 14-A City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 14-B PARKING IMPROVEMENT FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BUDGET (GAAP BASIS) AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Variance Budget Final Budget Positive Original Final Actual (Negative) Revenues Charges for services $ 110,000 $ 110,000 $ 108,600 (1,400) Earnings on investments -- -- 500 500 Total revenues 110,000 110,000 109,100 (900) Expenditures Streets Total expenditures 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Net change in fund balance 80,000 80,000 79,100 (900) Fund balance at beginning of year 148,542 162,687 162,687 Fund balance at end of year $ 228,542 $ 242,687 $ 241,787 $ (900) 159 City of Corpus Christi STREETS MAINTENANCE FUND BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 17,217,746 Receivables Accounts 1,341,349 Property leases 1,732 Intergovermental 844,510 Allowance for uncollectibles (126,862) Net receivables 2,060,729 Inventories 253,739 Total assets LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE $ 19,532,214 Liabilities Accounts payable $ 77,061 Accrued liabilities 139,350 Contractor interest and retainage payable 392,267 Total liabilities 608,678 Fund balance Nonspendable Inventory Committed Streets Total fund balance 253,739 18,669,797 18,923,536 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 19,532,214 160 Exhibit 15-A City of Corpus Christi STREETS MAINTENANCE FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BUDGET (GAAP BASIS) AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Revenues Licenses and permits Intergovernmental Grants Charges for services Earnings on investments Sale of City property Miscellaneous Total revenues Expenditures Current Traffic engineering Traffic signals Signs & markings Residential traffic management Street administration Street planning Street preventative maintenance Base restoration Surface preservation Reserve appropriation Uncollectible accounts Reimbursements Capital projects Debt service Principal retirement Interest Total expenditures Budget Original Final $ 55,100 2,547,486 12,355,716 10,500 $ 55,100 2,547,486 1,003,700 12,355,716 10,500 14,968, 802 15,972, 502 599,522 675,822 1,503,132 1,869,725 1,021,256 1,086,359 1,075,000 1,500 779,829 962,829 985,518 956,518 15,114,757 25,887,204 1,820,069 1,820,069 7,958,855 8,037,124 4,000 4,000 (10,000) (529,404) 100,000 467,407 30,951,938 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures (15,983,136) Other financing sources Capital leases Transfers in Total other financing sources Net change in fund balance Fund balance at beginning of year Fund balance at end of year 41,239,152 (25,266,650) 10,000 15,547,3 58 16,017,954 15,547,3 58 16,027,954 (435,778) (9,238,696) 485,778 12,159,762 Actual $ 40,586 2,427,736 844,510 12,349,009 42,734 19,462 6,764 15,730,801 676,082 1,786,733 867,172 1,694 889,275 337,528 13,224,685 1,514,385 5,042,770 86,005 (529,434) 1,124,357 598,332 37,067 25,656,651 (9,925,850) 671,670 16,017,954 16,689,624 6,763,774 12,159,762 Exhibit 15-B Variance Final Budget Positive (Negative) $ (14,514) (119,750) (159,190) (6,707) 42,734 19,462 (3,736) (241,701) (260) 82,992 219,187 (194) 73,554 618,990 12,662,519 305,684 2,994,354 4,000 (86,005) 30 (656,950) (598,332) (37,067) 15,582,501 (15,824,202) (661,670) (661,670) 16,002,470 $ 50,000 $ 2,921,066 $ 18,923,536 $ 16,002,470 161 City of Corpus Christi FEDERAL/STATE GRANTS FUND BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ Receivables Demolition liens 803,354 Special assessments 4,777 Intergovernmental 3,156,057 Miscellaneous 13,704 Allowance for uncollectibles (763,534) Net receivables 3,214,358 Total assets $ 3,214,358 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Liabilities Accounts payable $ 282,385 Accrued liabilities 84,869 Contractor interest and retainage payable 89,562 Deposits 214,130 Due to other funds 1,029,019 Due to other governmental agencies 2,784 Unearned revenues Demolition liens and other 44,896 Asset seizure and forfeitures 31,901 Grants 441,527 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality 14,763 Total unearned revenues 533,087 Total liabilities 2,235,836 Fund balance Restricted Law enforcement 306,744 Fire and ambulance 4,764 CDBG 243,762 Parks and recreation 426,104 Libraries 28 Community enrichment 7,010 Total restricted 988,412 Unassigned (9,890) Total fund balance 978,522 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 3,214,358 162 Exhibit 16-A City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 16-B FEDERAL/STATE GRANTS FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET (GAAP BASIS) AND ACTUAL FROM INCEPTION AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Project Prior Current Total to Authorization Years Year Date Revenues Grants State of Texas $ 2,801,481 $ 52,709,915 $ 1,190,065 $ 53,899,980 Federal Government 27,947,427 59,335,428 8,774,546 68,109,975 Drug forfeitures State 565,208 2,032,864 458,876 2,491,740 Federal 384,968 3,179,374 299,797 3,479,171 Local grants and contributions 146,127 2,772,435 344,355 3,116,790 Total grants 31,845,211 120,030,016 11,067,639 131,097,656 Charges for services 4,775,247 365,360 5,140,607 Earnings on investments 1,873 186,808 1,873 188,681 Miscellaneous 174,613 1,104,781 174,613 1,279,394 Total revenue 32,021,697 126,096,852 11,609,485 137,706,338 Expenditures Current Police and municipal court 4,494,431 20,504,730 1,942,052 22,446,782 Fire and ambulance 4,041,125 10,516,309 743,812 11,260,121 Emergency management 69,534 -- 69,534 69,534 Streets -- 7,560,375 -- 7,560,375 Health 3,518,764 14,253,955 2,073,768 16,327,723 Parks and recreation 4,160,626 17,649,946 1,962,321 19,612,267 Libraries 25,012 2,992,795 50,706 3,043,501 Community enrichment 5,883,949 20,122,789 1,503,105 21,625,894 Community development 7,692,775 19,190,795 1,460,551 20,651,346 Museums 266,127 266,127 Capital projects 1,707,390 11,740,162 1,707,390 13,447,552 Total expenditures 31,593,606 124,797,983 11,513,239 136,311,222 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures 428,091 1,298,869 96,246 1,395,116 Other financing sources (uses) Transfers in Corpus Christi Community Improvement Corporation -- 67,106 -- 67,106 General fund 209,470 1,831,141 209,469 2,040,610 Total transfers in 209,470 1,898,247 209,469 2,107,716 Transfers out Police Capital Projects Fund (280,000) (290,000) (280,000) (570,000) General fund (357,561) (1,596,749) (357,561) (1,954,310) Total transfers out (637,561) (1,886,749) (637,561) (2,524,310) Total other financing sources (uses) (428,091) 11,498 (428,092) (416,594) Net change in fund balance Fund balance at beginning of year Fund balance at end of year 163 $ 1,310,367 (331,846) $ 978,522 1,310,368 978,522 City of Corpus Christi MUNICIPAL COURT FUND BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 613,293 Total assets $ 613,293 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Liabilities Accounts payable $ 20,356 Accrued liabilities 2,502 Due to other governments 80 Total liabilities 22,938 Fund balance Restricted Municipal Court building security 106,316 Muncipal Court technology 119,707 Juvenile Court case manager 364,332 Total fund balance 590,355 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 613,293 164 Exhibit 17-A City of Corpus Christi MUNICIPAL COURT FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BUDGET (GAAP BASIS) AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Revenues Municipal Court building security fee Municipal Court technology fee Juvenile Court case manager fee Earnings on investments Total revenues Budget Original Final $ 96,354 128,154 151,751 376,259 $ 96,354 128,154 151,751 376,259 Expenditures Current Municipal Court building security 94,000 94,000 Municipal Court technology 212,720 212,720 Juvenile Court case managers 155,376 155,376 Total expenditures 462,096 462,096 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures (85,837) (85,837) Other financing sources Transfers in 49,349 49,349 Net change in fund balance Fund balance at beginning of year Fund balance at end of year (36,488) (36,488) 516,015 667,789 $ 479,527 $ 631,301 165 Actual $ 71,428 94,657 128,798 1,813 296,696 94,000 199,006 81,124 374,130 (77,434) (77,434) 667,789 Variance Final Budget Positive (Negative) $ (24,926) (33,497) (22,953) 1,813 (79,563) (13,714) (74,252) (87,966) 8,403 (49,349) (40,946) $ 590,355 $ (40.946) Exhibit 17-B City of Corpus Christi COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT FUND BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments Total assets LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE $ 3,585,624 $ 3,585,624 Liabilities Contractor interest and retainage payable $ 11,146 Total liabilities 11,146 Fund balance Restricted Parks and recreation 2,203,311 Committed Sister City programs 1,165 Park projects 3,265 Permanent art projects 260,427 Development projects 1,106,310 Total committed 1,371,167 Total fund balance 3,574,478 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 3,585,624 166 Exhibit 18-A City of Corpus Christi COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Revenues Contributions and donations $ 677,898 Earnings on investments 9,205 Sale of City property 8,793 Miscellaneous 1,036 Total revenues 696,932 Expenditures Current Parks and recreation 68 Capital projects 235,414 Total expenditures 235,482 Excess of revenues over expenditures 461,450 Other financing sources Transfers in 12,820 Net change in fund balance 474,270 Fund balance at beginning of year 3,100,208 Fund balance at end of year $ 3,574,478 167 Exhibit 18-B City of Corpus Christi INFRASTRUCTURE FUND BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments Total assets LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE $ 1,696,446 $ 1,696,446 Liabilities $ Fund balance Restricted Infrastructure 1,696,446 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 1,696,446 168 Exhibit 19-A City of Corpus Christi INFRASTRUCTURE FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Revenues Contributions and donations $ 334,182 Earnings on investments 4,602 Total revenues 338,784 Expenditures Capital projects 334,181 Excess of revenues over expenditures 4,603 Other financing sources (uses) Transfers out (3,295) Net change in fund balance Fund balance at beginning of year Fund balance at end of year 169 1,308 1,695,138 $ 1,696,446 Exhibit 19-B City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 20-A LOCAL EMERGENCY PLANNING COMMITTEE BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 91,875 Total assets $ 91,875 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Liabilities Accounts payable $ 854 Accrued liabilities 1,397 Deposits 28,910 Total liabilities 31,161 Fund balance Committed Local Emergency Planning Committee 60,714 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 91,875 City of Corpus Christi LOCAL EMERGENCY PLANNING COMNIITTEE SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BUDGET (GAAP BASIS) AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Budget Variance Final Budget Positive Original Final Actual (Negative) Revenues Contributions and donations S 97,460 $ 97,460 $ 96,114 $ (1,346) Earnings on investments -- -- 234 234 Total revenues 97,460 97,460 96,348 (1,112) Expenditures Current Emergency management 129,049 129,049 118,826 10,223 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures (31,589) (31,589) (22,478) 9,112 Net change in fund balance (31,589) (31,589) (22,478) 9,112 Fund balance at beginning of year 62,465 83,192 83,192 Fund balance at end of year $ 30,876 $ 51,603 $ 60,714 $ 9,112 171 Exhibit 20-B City of Corpus Christi CORPUS CHRISTI COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 3,198,011 Receivables Mortgages and loans 13,590,749 Allowance for uncollectibles (2,360,033) Net receivables 11,230,716 Total assets $ 14,428,727 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Liabilities Accounts payable $ 9,207 Deposits 332,713 Total liabilities 341,920 Fund balance Restricted Loans 14,086,807 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 14,428,727 172 Exhibit 21-A City of Corpus Christi CORPUS CHRISTI COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Revenues Federal Government $ 827,970 Contributions and donations 10,837 Earnings on investments 292 Interest on loans 59,282 Miscellaneous 707,587 Total revenues 1,605,968 Expenditures Current Community development Grants 1,535,381 Administration costs 64,318 Forgiven and uncollectible loans 492,561 Total expenditures 2,092,260 Net change in fund balance Fund balance at beginning of year Fund balance at end of year 173 (486,292) 14,573,099 $ 14,086,807 Exhibit 21-B City of Corpus Christi CORPUS CHRISTI HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF NET POSITION SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Governmental Funds Adjustments Exhibit 22-A Schedule of Net Position ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 86,000 $ $ 86,000 Receivables Due from subdivision developer 407,152 407,152 Capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation 822,953 822,953 Total assets $ 493,152 822,953 1,316,105 LIABILITIES Unearned revenues Total liabilities $ 406,152 406,152 406,152 406,152 FUND BALANCE Assigned Housing 87,000 (87,000) Total liabilities and fund balance $ 493,152 NET POSITION Invested in capital assets, net of related debt 822,953 822,953 Unrestricted 87,000 87,000 Total net position $ 909,953 $ 909,953 174 City of Corpus Christi CORPUS CHRISTI HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Governmental Funds Adjustments Exhibit 22-B Schedule of Activities Expenditures/expenses Community development $ 16,669 $ 27,510 $ 44,179 Total expenditures/expenses 16,669 27,510 44,179 Program revenue Charges for services 60,600 Operating grants and contributions 5,000 Net program revenue (expense) 48,931 General revenue Earnings on investments (27,510) 60,600 5,000 21,421 3 3 Change in fund balance/net position 48,934 (27,510) 21,424 Fund balance/net position beginning of year 38,066 850,463 888,529 Fund balance/net position end of year $ 87,000 $ 822,953 $ 909,953 175 City of Corpus Christi CORPUS CHRISTI HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 86,000 Receivables Accounts 407,152 Total assets $ 493,152 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Liabilities Unearned revenues Other $ 406,152 Fund balance Assigned Housing 87,000 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 493,152 176 Exhibit 22-C City of Corpus Christi CORPUS CHRISTI HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Revenues Charges for services $ 60,600 Contributions and donations 5,000 Earnings on investments 3 Total revenues 65,603 Expenditures Current Community development 16,669 Net change in fund balance 48,934 Fund balance at beginning of year 38,066 Fund balance at end of year $ 87,000 177 Exhibit 22-D City of Corpus Christi CORPUS CHRISTI INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 68,775 Total assets $ 68,775 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Liabilities $ Fund balance Assigned Industrial development 68,775 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 68,775 178 Exhibit 23-A City of Corpus Christi CORPUS CHRISTI INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Revenues $ Net change in fund balance Fund balance at beginning of year 68,775 Fund balance at end of year $ 68,775 179 Exhibit 23-B City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 24-A CORPUS CHRISTI CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF NET POSITION SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Governmental Schedule Funds Adjustments of Net Position ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 5,153,917 $ $ 5,153,917 Receivables Intergovernmental 516,509 516,509 Miscellaneous 89 89 Net receivables 516,598 516,598 Total assets DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred outflows related to net pension liability $ 5,670,515 5,670,515 693,631 693,631 LIABILITIES Accounts payable $ 98,980 98,980 Accrued liabilities 129,954 129,954 Accumulated unpaid compensated absences Due within one year 277,936 277,936 Due in more than one year 329,871 329,871 Net pension liability 5,807,796 5,807,796 Net OPEB obligation 175,990 175,990 Total liabilities 228,934 6,591,593 6,820,527 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred inflows related to net pension liability FUND BALANCE Restricted Crime control and prevention Total fund balance 138,596 138,596 5,441,581 (5,441,581) 5,441,581 (5,441,581) Total liabilities and fund balance $ 5,670,515 NET POSITION Restricted for Crime control and prevention (594,977) (594,977) Total net position $ (594,977) $ (594,977) 180 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 24-B CORPUS CHRISTI CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Governmental Schedule Funds Adjustments of Activities Expenditures/expenses Public safety $ 6,549,015 $ 154,308 $ 6,703,323 Capital projects 126,473 (126,473) -- Total expenditures/expenses 6,675,488 27,835 6,703,323 General revenue Sales tax 7,168,860 7,168,860 Juvenile drug testing 6,313 6,313 Earnings on investments 14,143 14,143 Sale of City property 18,524 18,524 Total general revenue 7,207,840 7,207,840 Other financing sources (uses) Transfers out (126,473) (126,473) Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures and other financing uses 532,352 (532,352) Change in net position 378,044 378,044 Fund balance/net position beginning of year 4,909,229 (1,918,284) 2,990,945 Prior period adjustment for change in accounting for pension liability (3,963,966) (3,963,966) Fund balance/adjusted net position beginning of year 4,909,229 (5,882,250) (973,021) Fund balance/net position end of year $ 5,441,581 $ (6,036,558) $ (594,977) 181 City of Corpus Christi CORPUS CHRISTI CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments Receivables Intergovernmental Miscellaneous Net receivables $ 5,153,917 516,509 89 516,598 Total assets $ 5,670,515 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Liabilities Accounts payable $ 98,980 Accrued liabilities 129,954 Total liabilities 228,934 Fund balance Restricted Crime control and prevention 5,441,581 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 5,670,515 182 Exhibit 24-C City of Corpus Christi CORPUS CHRISTI CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET (GAAP BASIS) AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Variance Budget Final Budget Positive Original Final Actual (Negative) Revenues Sales tax $ 7,575,750 $ 7,575,750 $ 7,168,860 $ (406,890) Juvenile drug testing 10,000 10,000 6,313 (3,687) Earnings on investments 3,000 3,000 14,143 11,143 Sale of City property -- -- 18,524 18,524 Total revenue 7,588,750 7,588,750 7,207,840 (380,910) Expenditures Current Police officers 5,198,404 6,301,598 5,384,443 917,155 Pawn shop detail 170,011 170,011 165,851 4,160 Juvenile Curfew & Truancy Assessment Center 469,527 469,527 425,432 44,095 Crime prevention 191,482 191,482 128,160 63,322 Public safety vehicles and equipment 180,000 1,721,213 381,111 1,340,102 Juvenile City marshals 140,243 140,243 64,018 76,225 Reserve appropriation 50,000 50,000 -- 50,000 Capital projects -- -- 126,473 (126,473) Total expenditures 6,399,667 9,044,074 6,675,488 2,368,586 Net change in fund balance 1,189,083 (1,455,324) 532,352 1,987,676 Fund balance at beginning of year 4,511,918 4,909,229 4,909,229 Fund balance at end of year $ 5,701,001 $ 3,453,905 $ 5,441,581 $ 1,987,676 183 Exhibit 24-D City of Corpus Christi CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF NET POSITION SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Governmental Funds Adjustments Exhibit 25-A Schedule of Net Position ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 64,868,838 $ $ 64,868,838 Receivables Intergovernmental 1,569,726 1,569,726 Prepaid items 55,646 55,646 Total assets $ 66,494,210 66,494,210 LIABILITIES Accounts payable Accrued interest Contractor interest and retainage payable Long -teen debt Due within one year Due in more than one year Total liabilities $ 100,373 12,453 112,826 $ 100,373 209,097 209,097 12,453 6,010,000 6,010,000 54,094,433 54,094,433 60,313,530 60,426,356 FUND BALANCE Nonspendable Restricted Seawall improvement 37,249,581 (37,249,581) Arena facility 20,581,973 (20,581,973) Economic development 8,549,831 (8,549,831) Total restricted 66,381,385 (66,381,385) Total fund balance 66,381,385 (66,381,385) Total liabilities and fund balance $ 66,494,211 NET POSITION Restricted for Business and job development 6,067,855 6,067,855 Total net position $ 6,067,855 $ 6,067,855 184 City of Corpus Christi CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Governmental Funds Adjustments Exhibit 25-B Schedule of Activities Expenditures/expenses General government $ 53,454 $ $ 53,454 Community development 7,546,486 7,546,486 Capital projects 458,663 (458,663) -- Debt service Principal retirement 5,790,000 (5,790,000) -- Interest 2,664,969 (1,227,705) 1,437,264 Paying agent fees 2,000 -- 2,000 Total expenditures/expenses 16,515,572 (7,476,368) 9,039,204 General revenues Sales tax 21,874,668 21,874,668 Earnings on investments 253,710 253,710 Payments from Lexington Museum Association -- -- Transfers out (1,246,970) (458,663) (1,705,633) Total general revenues and other financing sources (uses) 20,881,408 (458,663) 20,422,745 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures and other financing uses 4,365,836 (4,365,836) Change in net position 11,383,541 11,383,541 Fund balance/net position at beginning of year 62,015,549 (67,331,235) (5,315,686) Fund balance/net position end of year $ 66,381,385 $ (60,313,530) $ 6,067,855 185 City of Corpus Christi CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Special Revenue Seawall Arena Economic Improvement Facility Development ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 17,643,353 $ 17,053,173 $ 6,160,140 Receivables Intergovernmental 523,242 523,242 523,242 Prepaid items -- -- 55,646 Total assets $ 18,166,595 $ 17,576,415 $ 6,739,028 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Liabilities Accounts payable $ 302 $ 302 $ 96,565 Contractor interest and retainage payable -- -- -- Total liabilities 302 302 96,565 Fund balances Nonspendable Restricted Seawall improvement 18,166,293 -- Arena facility -- 17,576,113 Economic development -- 6,642,463 Total fund balance 18,166,293 17,576,113 6,642,463 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 18,166,595 $ 17,576,415 $ 6,739,028 186 City of Corpus Christi Debt Service Capital Projects Economic Seawall Arena Development Seawall Exhibit 25-C Arena Total $ 1,340,610 $ 2,905,475 $ 1,907,368 $ 17,758,335 $ 100,385 $ 64,868,839 1,569,726 55,646 $ 1,340,610 $ 2,905,475 $ 1,907,368 $ 17,758,335 $ 100.385 $ 66,494,211 1,340,610 1,340,610 $ $ $ 3,204 $ 12,453 15,657 $ 100,373 12,453 112,826 -- 17,742,678 -- 37,249,581 2,905,475 -- -- 100,385 20,581,973 -- 1,907,368 -- 8,549,831 2,905,475 1,907,368 $ 1,340,610 $ 2,905,475 $ 1,907,368 17,742,678 100,385 66,381,385 $ 17,758,335 $ 100,385 $ 66,494,211 City of Corpus Christi Revenues Sales tax Earnings on investments Total revenue CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Special Revenue Seawall Arena Economic Improvement Facility Development $ 7,291,556 $ 7,291,556 $ 7,291,556 127,034 44,667 23,704 7,418,590 7,336,223 7,315,260 Expenditures Current General government Community development 1,229 151,987 7,393,270 Capital projects Debt service Principal retirement Interest Paying agent fees Total expenditures 1,229 151,987 7,393,270 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures 7,417,361 7,184,236 (78,010) Other financing sources (uses) Transfers in Transfers out (10,565,816) (5,321,170) (2,314,275) Total other financing sources (uses) (10,565,816) (5,321,170) (2,314,275) Net change in fund balances (3,148,455) 1,863,066 (2,392,285) Fund balances at beginning of year 21,314,748 15,713,047 9,034,748 Fund balances at end of year $ 18,166,293 $ 17,576,113 $ 6,642,463 188 City of Corpus Christi Debt Service Capital Project Exhibit 25-11 Economic Seawall Arena Development Seawall Arena Eliminations Total $ $ $ $ $ $ 21,874,668 3,855 9,741 7,080 37,334 295 253,710 3,855 9,741 7,080 37,334 1,790,000 2,080,000 1,920,000 1,073,819 1,328,800 262,350 1,000 500 500 53,454 452,317 2,864,819 3,409,300 2,182,850 505,771 (2,860,964) (3,399,559) (2,175,770) (468,437) 2,865,816 4,074,200 2,314,275 7,700,000 2,865,816 4,074,200 2,314,275 7,700,000 295 22,128,378 6,346 53,454 7,546,486 458,663 5,790,000 2,664,969 2,000 6,346 16,515,572 (6,051) 5,612,806 4,852 674,641 138,505 7,231,563 (6,051) 1,335,758 2,230,834 1,768,863 10,511,115 106,436 (16,954,291) 16,954,291 $ 1,340,610 $ 2,905,475 $ 1,907,368 $ 17,742,678 $ 100,385 $ (1,246,970) (1,246,970) 4,365,836 62,015,549 $ 66,381,385 City of Corpus Christi CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SEAWALL IMPROVEMENT FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET (GAAP BASIS) AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Variance Budget Final Budget Positive Original Final Actual (Negative) Revenues Sales tax $ 7,901,170 $ 7,901,170 $ 7,291,556 $ (609,614) Earnings on investments 50,000 50,000 127,034 77,034 Total revenue 7,951,170 7,951,170 7,418,590 (532,580) Expenditures Current Community development 15,000 15,000 1,229 13,771 Excess of revenues over expenditures 7,936,170 7,936,170 7,417,361 (518,809) Other financing uses Transfers out (10,565,816) (10,565,816) (10,565,816) Net change in fund balance (2,629,646) (2,629,646) (3,148,455) (518,809) Fund balance at beginning of year 21,473,568 21,473,568 21,314,748 (158,820) Fund balance at end of year $ 18,843,922 $ 18,843,922 $ 18,166,293 $ (677,629) 190 Exhibit 25-E City of Corpus Christi Revenues Sales tax Earnings on investments Total revenue CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ARENA FACILITY FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET (GAAP BASIS) AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Budget Original Final Actual $ 7,901,170 $ 7,901,170 $ 7,291,556 30,000 30,000 44,667 7,931,170 7,931,170 7,336,223 Expenditures Current Community development 215,000 215,000 151,987 Excess of revenues over expenditures 7,716,170 7,716,170 7,184,236 Other financing uses Transfers out (5,321,170) (5,321,170) (5,321,170) Net change in fund balance 2,395,000 2,395,000 1,863,066 Fund balance at beginning of year 15,824,568 15,824,568 15,713,047 Fund balance at end of year $ 18,219,568 $ 18,219,568 191 Variance Final Budget Positive (Negative) $ (609,614) 14,667 (594,947) 63,013 (531,934) (531,934) (111,521) $ 17,576,113 $ (643,455) Exhibit 25-F City of Corpus Christi CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET (GAAP BASIS) AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Budget Original Variance Final Budget Positive Final Actual (Negative) Revenues Sales tax $ 7,901,170 $ 7,901,170 $ 7,291,556 $ (609,614) Earnings on investments 16,000 16,000 23,704 7,704 Total revenue 7,917,170 7,917,170 7,315,260 (601,910) Expenditures Current Community development Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing uses Transfers out 1,538,818 19,232,013 7,393,270 11,838,743 1,538,818 19,232,013 7,393,270 11,838,743 6,378,352 (11,314,843) (78,010) 11,236,833 (2,314,275) (2,314,275) (2,314,275) Net change in fund balance 4,064,077 (13,629,118) (2,392,285) 11,236,833 Fund balance at beginning of year 323,404 323,404 9,034,748 8,711,344 Fund balance at end of year $ 4,387,481 $ (13,305,714) $ 6,642,463 $ 19,948,177 192 Exhibit 25-G City of Corpus Christi Revenues Earnings on investments CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SEAWALL DEBT SERVICE FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET (GAAP BASIS) AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Variance Budget Final Budget Positive Original Final Actual (Negative) $ $ $ 3,855 $ 3,855 Expenditures Debt service Principal retirement 1,790,000 1,790,000 1,790,000 Interest 1,073,819 1,073,819 1,073,819 Paying agent fees 2,000 2,000 1,000 Total expenditures 2,865,819 2,865,819 2,864,819 1,000 1,000 Deficiency of revenues under expenditures (2,865,819) (2,865,819) (2,860,964) 4,855 Other financing sources Transfers in 2,865,816 2,865,816 2,865,816 Net change in fund balance (3) (3) 4,852 4,855 Fund balance at beginning of year 1,335,338 1,335,338 1,335,758 420 Fund balance at end of year $ 1,335,335 $ 1,335,335 $ 1,340,610 $ 5,275 193 Exhibit 25-H City of Corpus Christi CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ARENA DEBT SERVICE FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET (GAAP BASIS) AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Budget Variance Final Budget Positive Original Final Actual (Negative) Revenues Earnings on investments S $ - $ 9,741 $ 9,741 Total revenue 9,741 9,741 Expenditures Current Principal retirement 2,744,400 2,744,400 2,080,000 664,400 Interest 1,328,800 1,328,800 1,328,800 Paying agent fees 1,000 1,000 500 500 Total expenditures 4,074,200 4,074,200 3,409,300 664,900 Deficiency of revenues under expenditures Other financing sources Transfers in Total other financing sources (4,074,200) (4,074,200) (3,399,559) 674,641 4,074,200 4,074,200 4,074,200 4,074,200 4,074,200 4,074,200 Net change in fund balance 674,641 674,641 Fund balance at beginning of year 2,219,005 2,219,005 2,230,834 11,829 Fund balance at end of year $ 2,219,005 $ 2,219,005 $ 2,905,475 $ 686,470 194 Exhibit 25-I City of Corpus Christi CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEBT SERVICE FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET (GAAP BASIS) AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Budget Original Variance Final Budget Positive Final Actual (Negative) Revenues Earnings on investments $ $ $ 7,080 $ 7,080 Expenditures Debt service Principal retirement 2,051,175 2,051,175 1,920,000 131,175 Interest 262,350 262,350 262,350 -- Paying agent fees 750 750 500 250 Total expenditures 2,314,275 2,314,275 2,182,850 131,425 Deficiency of revenues under expenditures (2,314,275) (2,314,275) (2,175,770) 138,505 Other financing sources Transfers in Total other financing sources 2,314,275 2,314,275 2,314,275 2,314,275 2,314,275 2,314,275 Net change in fund balance 138,505 138,505 Fund balance at beginning of year 1,758,613 1,758,613 1,768,863 10,250 Fund balance at end of year $ 1,758,613 $ 1,758,613 $ 1,907,368 $ 148,755 195 Exhibit 25-J City of Corpus Christi ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments Total assets NORTH PADRE ISLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF NET POSITION SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Governmental Funds Adjustments Exhibit 26-A Schedule of Net Position $ 7,347,694 $ $ 7,347,694 $ 7,347,694 $ $ 7,347,694 DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unamortized costs on refunded debt 160,997 160,997 Total deferred outflows of resources $ 160,997 $ 160,997 LIABILITIES Accounts payable Accrued interest Long-term debt Due within one year Due in more than one year Total liabilities FUND BALANCE Restricted North Padre Island development Debt service Total fund balance $ 2,310 $ -- $ 2,310 17,540 17,540 910,000 910,000 7,860,000 7,860,000 2,310 8,787,540 8,789,850 6,000,884 1,344,500 (6,000,884) (1,344,500) 7,345,384 (7,345,384) Total liabilities and fund balance $ 7,347,694 NET POSITION Restricted for North Padre Island Development Corporation (1,281,159) (1,281,159) Total net position $ (1,281,159) $ (1,281,159) 196 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 26-B NORTH PADRE ISLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Governmental Schedule Funds Adjustments of Activities Expenditures/expenses General government $ 25,548 $ $ 25,548 Community enrichment 22,748 22,748 Capital projects 226,520 (226,520) -- Debt service Principal retirement 830,000 (830,000) -- Interest 432,000 (30,542) 401,458 Paying agent fees 5,694 -- 5,694 Total expenditures/expenses 1,542,510 (1,087,062) 455,448 General revenues Property tax 2,880,930 2,880,930 Earnings on investments 3,050 3,050 Other financing uses Transfers out (17,558) (226,520) (244,078) Total general revenues and other financing uses 2,866,422 (226,520) 2,639,902 Excess of revenues over expenditures and transfers out 1,323,912 (1,323,912) Change in net position 2,184,454 2,184,454 Fund balance/net position at beginning of year 6,021,472 (9,487,085) (3,465,613) Fund balance/net position end of year $ 7,345,384 $ (8,626,543) $ (1,281,159) 197 City of Corpus Christi NORTH PADRE ISLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 General Capital Projects Eliminations Total ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 4,984,241 $ 2,363,453 $ 7,347,694 Total assets $ 4,984,241 $ 2,363,453 $ $ 7,347,694 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Liabilites Accounts payable $ 2,310 $ $ 2,310 Total liabilities 2,310 2,310 Fund balances Restricted North Padre Island development 3,637,431 2,363,453 6,000,884 Debt service 1,344,500 -- 1,344,500 Total fund balance 4,981,931 2,363,453 7,345,384 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 4,984,241 $ 2,363,453 $ $ 7,347,694 198 Exhibit 26-C City of Corpus Christi NORTH PADRE ISLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 General Capital Proiects Eliminations Total Revenues Taxes and business fees $ 2,880,930 $ -- $ $ 2,880,930 Earnings on investments 2 3,048 3,050 Total revenue 2,880,932 3,048 2,883,980 Expenditures Current General government -- 25,548 25,548 Community enrichment 22,748 22,748 Capital projects -- 226,520 226,520 Debt service Principal retirement 830,000 830,000 Interest 432,000 432,000 Paying agent fees 5,694 5,694 Total expenditures 1,290,442 252,068 1,542,510 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures 1,590,490 (249,020) 1,341,470 Other financing sources (uses) Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) (1,672,751) 1,655,193 (1,655,193) 1,655,193 (17,558) (1,672,751) 1,655,193 -- (17,558) Net change in fund balances (82,261) 1,406,173 1,323,912 Fund balances at beginning of year 5,064,192 957,280 6,021,472 Fund balances at end of year $ 4,981,931 $ 2,363,453 $ $ 7,345,384 199 Exhibit 26-11 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 City of Corpus Christi NORTH PADRE ISLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION GENERAL FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET (GAAP BASIS) AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Variance Budget Final Budget Positive Original Final Actual (Negative) Revenues Taxes and business fees $ 2,810,300 $ 2,810,300 $ 2,880,930 $ 70,630 Eamings on investments -- -- 2 2 Total revenues 2,810,300 2,810,300 2,880,932 70,632 Expenditures Current Community enrichment 124,940 124,940 22,748 Debt service Principal retirement 830,000 830,000 830,000 Interest 432,000 432,000 432,000 Paying agent fees 5,400 5,400 5,694 Total expenditures 1,392,340 1,392,340 1,290,442 102,192 (294) 101,898 Excess of revenues over expenditures 1,417,960 1,417,960 1,590,490 172,530 Other financing sources (uses) Transfers out (1,672,751) (1,672,751) (1,672,751) Net change in fund balance (254,791) (254,791) (82,261) 172,530 Fund balance at beginning of year 4,624,588 5,064,192 5,064,192 Fund balance at end of year $ 4,369,797 $ 4,809,401 $ 4,981,931 $ 172,530 201 Exhibit 26-E City of Corpus Christi REINVESTMENT ZONE #3 BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 2,253,569 Total assets $ 2,253,569 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Liabilities $ Fund balance Restricted Downtown development 2,253,569 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 2,253,569 202 Exhibit 27-A City of Corpus Christi REINVESTMENT ZONE #3 SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BUDGET (GAAP BASIS) AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Revenues Taxes and business fees Earnings on investments Total revenues Net change in fund balance Other financing sources (uses) Transfers out Excess of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other uses Fund balance at beginning of year Budget Original $ 661,900 500 662,400 662,400 (1,344) 661,056 1,555,319 Final $ 661,900 500 662,400 662,400 (1,344) 661,056 1,563,751 Actual $ 685,432 5,730 691,162 691,162 (1,344) 689,818 1,563,751 Exhibit 27-B Variance Final Budget Positive (Negative) $ 23,532 5,230 28,762 28,762 28,762 Fund balance at end of year $ 2,216,375 $ 2,224,807 $ 2,253,569 $ 28,762 203 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 Capital Projects Funds Capital Projects Funds Capital Projects Funds are used for construction projects to purchase land and to purchase equipment for various City facilities and projects. A capital projects fund continues in existence until the project is complete or the funds are exhausted. Major Fund Street Capital Projects Fund — This fund was established for recording the improvements and widening of streets. Non -major Funds Bayfront Arts/Science Bond Fund This fund was established for recording the construction of additions to the Museum, construction of the Columbus Fleet Shipyard and Seaport and other improvements at the Bayfront Arts & Science Park. City Buildings and Facilities Fund This fund was established for recording the purchase of a site, and constructing and equipping a new City Hall, and for major maintenance and enhancements to general purpose City buildings and facilities. Convention Facility Bond Fund This fund was established for recording the construction of a community convention facility. Library Bond Fund This fund was established for recording the construction of improvements to the Corpus Christi Public Library System. Park Bond Fund This fund was established for recording improvements and expansion of park and recreational facilities. Police Building Bond Fund — This fund was established for recording the construction of improvements for the Police Department. Public Health and Safety Bond Fund — This fund was established for recording the construction of improvements related to health and safety projects. Fire Bond Fund — This fund was established for recording construction and improvements to City fire stations. Landfill Bond Fund This fund was established for recording the construction of improvements to the landfill. Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation — Arena Bond Fund This fund was established for recording the construction and improvements of the arena. Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation — Seawall Bond Fund This fund was established for recording the construction of improvements to the seawall. North Padre Island Development Corporation Bond Fund This fund was established for recording the construction of Packery Channel. CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 City of Corpus Christi STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments Receivables Special assessments Allowance for uncollectibles Net receivables $ 160,723,710 749,322 (663,753) 85,569 Total assets $ 160,809,279 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Liabilities Accounts payable $ 28,777 Contractor interest and retainage payable 186,051 Deposits 353,400 Total liabilities 568,228 Fund balances Restricted Capital projects 156,013,014 Committed Capital projects 2,647,222 Assigned Capital projects 1,580,815 Total fund balance 160,241,051 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 160,809,279 206 Exhibit 28-A City of Corpus Christi STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Revenues Contributions and donations $ 709,320 Special assessments 54,056 Interest on special assessments 12,882 Attorneys fees on special assessments 1,014 Eamings on investments 284,697 Property Rentals 17,145 Miscellaneous 32,097 Total revenues 1,111,211 Expenditures Current General government 215,235 Capital projects 11,190,163 Debt service Bond issuance cost 716,865 Total expenditures 12,122,263 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures (11,011,052) Other financing sources General obligation bonds issued Premium on bonds issued Transfer in from Visitors Facility CIP Fd Total other financing sources Net change in fund balances Fund balances at beginning of year Fund balances at end of year 207 83,571,766 9,002,953 3,295 92,578,014 81,566,962 78,674,089 $ 160,241,051 Exhibit 28-B City of Corpus Christi CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Bayfront City Buildings Convention Arts/Science and Facilities Facility ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 5,801,006 $ 6,227,954 $ 27,108 Total assets $ 5,801,006 $ 6,227,954 $ 27,108 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Liabilities Accounts payable Contractor interest and retainage payable Advance from other funds Total liabilities $ $ 45,918 $ 139,598 269,248 139,598 315,166 Fund balances Restricted Seawall improvement -- Arena facility North Padre Island development -- -- -- Capital projects 5,535,654 5,832,416 21,894 Committed Capital projects 125,753 38,043 5,214 Assigned Capital projects 42,329 Unassigned -- Total fund balance 5,661,407 5,912,788 27,108 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 5,801,005 $ 6,227,954 $ 27,108 (Continued) City of Corpus Christi Library Park Police Exhibit 29-A Public Health & Safety Fire Landfill $ 79,161 $ 23,311,954 $ 569,556 $ 330,426 $ 1,972,397 $ 930,538 $ 79,161 $ 23,311,954 $ 569,556 $ 330,426 $ 1,972,397 $ 930,538 $ $ 200 $ 36,327 69,318 27,374 500,000 8,685 21,428 36,527 527,374 8,685 21,428 22,975,078 567,760 9,843 279,812 1,796 20,537 79,161 23,275,427 569,556 1,906,005 771,132 57,707 137,978 (196,948) (196,948) 1,963,712 909,110 $ 79,161 $ 23,311,954 $ 569,556 $ 330,426 $ 1,972,397 $ 930,538 City of Corpus Christi CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Corpus Christi Business and Job North Padre Development Corporation Island Development Seawall Arena Corporation ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 17,758,335 $ 100,385 $ 2,363,453 Total assets $ 17,758,335 $ 100,385 $ 2,363,453 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Liabilities Accounts payable $ 3,204 $ $ Contractor interest and retainage payable 12,453 Advance from other funds -- Total liabilities 15,657 Fund balances Restricted Seawall improvement 17,742,678 -- Arena facility -- 100,385 -- North Padre Island development -- 2,363,453 Capital projects -- Subtotal 17,742,678 100,385 2,363,453 Committed Capital projects Assigned Capital projects Unassigned Total fund balance 17,742,678 100,385 2,363,453 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 17,758,335 $ 100,385 $ 2,363,453 City of Corpus Christi Eliminations Total $ $ 59,472,272 $ $ 59,472,272 $ $ 49,322 515,113 500,000 1,064,435 17,742,678 100,385 2,363,453 37,679,257 57,885,773 656,146 62,867 (196,948) 58,407,838 $ -- $ 59,472,273 Exhibit 29-A (Continued) City of Corpus Christi CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Bayfront City Buildings Convention Arts/Science and Facilities Facility Library Revenues Earnings on investments $ 19,989 $ 21,325 $ 75 $ 219 Miscellaneous -- 84,364 -- -- Total revenues 19,989 105,689 75 219 Expenditures Current General government 62,495 66,740 Capital projects 3,089,980 4,715,707 Debt service Bond issuance cost Total expenditures 3,152,475 4,782,447 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing sources Proceeds from general obligation bonds Premium on bonds issued Transfer in from Seawall Improvement fund Reinvestment Zone fund Law Enforcement Trust Fund Total other financing sources (3,132,486) (4,676,758) 75 219 Net change in fund balances (3,132,486) (4,676,758) 75 219 Fund balances at beginning of year 8,793,893 10,589,546 27,033 78,942 Fund balances at end of year $ 5,661,407 $ 5,912,788 $ 27,108 $ 79,161 (Continued) 212 City of Corpus Christi Park Police Exhibit 29-B Public Health & Safety Fire Landfill $ 54,718 $ 1.791 $ 1,403 $ 6,000 $ 5,242 54,718 L791 1,403 6,000 5,242 132,787 9,197 40,293 38,528 74,284 1,452,911 125,444 568,147 447,142 1,152,054 59,601 1,645,299 134,641 608,440 485,670 1,226,338 (1,590,581) 6,948,234 748,513 7,696,747 (132,850) (607,037) (479,670) (1,221,096) 6,106,166 (132,850) 17,169,261 702,406 $ 23,275,427 280,000 280,000 (327,037) (479,670) (1,221,096) 130,089 2,443,382 2,130,206 $ 569,556 $ (196,948) $ 1,963,712 $ 909,110 City of Corpus Christi CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Corpus Christi Business and Job North Padre Development Corporation Island Development Seawall Arena Corporation Eliminations Revenues Earnings on investments $ 37,334 $ 295 $ 3,048 $ Miscellaneous -- -- Total revenues 37,334 295 3,048 Expenditures Current General government 53,454 -- 25,548 Capital projects 452,317 6,346 226,520 Debt service Bond issuance cost Total expenditures 505,771 6,346 252,068 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures (468,437) (6,051) (249,020) Other financing sources General obligation bonds issued Premium on bonds issued Transfer in from Seawall Improvement fund Reinvestment Zone fund Law Enforcement Trust Fund Total other financing sources 7,700,000 1,655,193 7,700,000 1,655,193 Net change in fund balances 7,231,563 (6,051) 1,406,173 Fund balances at beginning of year 10,511,115 106,436 957,280 Fund balances at end of year $ 17,742,678 $ 100,385 $ 2,363,453 $ 214 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 29-B (Continued) Total $ 151,439 84,364 235,803 503,326 12,236,568 59,601 12,799,495 (12,563,692) 6,948,234 748,513 7,700,000 1,655,193 280,000 17,331,940 4,768,248 53,639,589 $ 58,407,837 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 Proprietary Funds Enterprise Funds Enterprise Funds are used to account for City operations that are financed and/or operated in a manner similar to private business. Included in this category are Utility System, Airport, Golf Centers, and Marina Funds. Major Funds Utility System Fund This fund was established to account for the City's water system, waste water disposal system, gas system, and storm water sewer and drainage system. Airport Fund This fund was established to account for operations of the Corpus Christi International Airport. Non -major Funds Golf Centers Fund This fund was established to account for operations of the Gabe Lozano, Sr. and the Oso Golf Centers. Marina Fund This fund was established to account for operations of the Marina. Enterprise Funds CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 City of Corpus Christi ASSETS Current assets Cash, cash equivalents and investments Receivables Accounts Property leases Employees Intergovermental Miscellaneous Allowance for uncollectibles Net receivables Inventories Prepaid items Restricted assets Cash, cash equivalents and investments Total current assets Noncurrent assets Capital assets Land Water supply rights Buildings Improvements other than buildings Machinery and equipment Infrastructure Total capital assets in service Less accumulated depreciation and amortiza Net capital assets in service Construction in progress Net capital assets Total noncurrent assets Total assets DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unamortized loss on refunded debt Deferred outflows related to pension liability Total deferred outflows of resources (Continued) UTILITY SYSTEM FUND COMBINING SCHEDULE OF NET POSITION SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Gas Water $ 8,747,792 $ 64,709,039 3,369,456 16,428,742 -- 160 55 -- 1,104,763 4,000 3,165 (724,722) (1,733,169) 2,648,734 6,274,062 17,670,588 15,803,716 687,818 197,756 202,742,527 284,140,856 Wastewater $ 35,942,721 9,104,398 28 11,739 15,996 (1,168,620) 7,963,541 99,824,657 143,730,919 697,548 17,622,086 5,164,303 210,710,247 1,793,458 33,683,278 2,412,934 9,470,778 94,358,674 162,019,305 2,612,036 14, 841,317 12,472,246 77,317,441 721,734,173 299,577,334 91,891,261 1,092,949,775 481,646,122 on (41,330,615) (308,968,053) (161,672,121) 50,560,646 783,981,722 319,974,001 4,841,916 200,315,921 97,339,188 55,402,562 984,297,643 417,313,189 55,402,562 984,297,643 417,313,189 73,073,150 1,268,438,499 561,044,108 88,755 4,701,182 1,427,050 Eliminations $ Total $ 109,399,552 28,902,596 188 11,794 1,104,763 23,161 (3,626,511) 26,415,991 687,818 197,756 308,841,246 445,542,363 23,483,937 210,710,247 37,889,670 265,848,757 29,925,599 1,098,628,948 1,666,487,158 (511,970,789) 1,154,516,369 302,497,025 1,457,013,394 1,457,013,394 1,902,555,757 6,216,987 1,022,171 2,090,926 1,115,715 4,228,812 1,110,926 6,792,108 2,542,765 10,445,799 218 City of Corpus Christi Gas Exhibit 30-A Water Wastewater Eliminations Total LIABILITIES Current liabilities Accounts payable $ 241,475 $ 1,525,090 $ 438,793 $ $ 2,205,358 Accrued expenses 170,746 380,605 196,717 748,068 Accrued interest 197,720 6,036,704 2,643,122 8,877,546 Contractor interest and retainage payable 38,701 1,116,768 365,233 1,520,702 Deposits 763,370 1,234,626 3,996 2,001,992 Liability to claimants - escheat property -- 124,308 -- 124,308 Unearned revenue -- 16,204 16,204 Current portion of long-term liabilities Long-term debt 675,036 31,927,547 9,349,656 41,952,239 Accumulated unpaid compensated absences 195,822 523,166 289,162 1,008,150 Total current liabilities 2,282,870 42,868,814 13,302,883 58,454,567 Noncurrent liabilities Long-term liabilities, net of current portion Long-term debt 20,520,698 798,838,492 265,556,810 1,084,916,000 Accumulated unpaid compensated absences 536,451 508,747 292,306 1,337,504 Net pension liability 8,706,836 17,435,854 10,746,421 36,889,111 Net OPEB obligation 127,877 284,777 157,545 570,199 Total noncurrent liabilities 29,891,862 817,067,870 276,753,082 1,123,712,814 Total liabilities 32,174,732 859,936,684 290,055,965 1,182,167,3 81 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred inflows related to pension liability 202,423 412,913 221,683 837,019 Total deferred inflows of resources 202,423 412,913 221,683 837,019 NET POSITION Net invested in capital assets 40,137,631 349,895,266 235,873,659 625,906,556 Restricted for Bond interest and redemption 417,229 7,085,159 4,429,205 11,931,593 Improvements to utility lines and facilities -- 2,752,411 2,884,871 5,637,282 Abatement of public health hazards -- -- 95,765 95,765 Unrestricted 1,252,061 55,148,174 30,025,725 86,425,960 Total net position $ 41,806,921 $ 414,881,010 $ 273,309,225 $ $ 729,997,156 219 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 City of Corpus Christi UTILITY SYSTEM FUND COMBINING SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN NET POSITION YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Operating revenues Charges for services - net Operating expenses Personal services Materials and supplies Contractual services Other operating expenses Uncollectible accounts Depreciation Total operating expenses Operating income Nonoperating revenues (expenses) Investment income Interest expense and fiscal charges Bond issue costs Net gain (loss) on disposal of assets Recovery on damage claims Developer deposits Reimbursements to developers Contributions from other governmental agencies Total nonoperating expenses Capital contributions Contributions from other governmental agencies Contributions from developers Contributions from others Total capital contributions Income before transfers Transfers in Transfers out Total transfers Net income Net position at beginning of year Prior period adjustment for change in accounting for pension liability Adjusted net position at beginning of year Net position at end of year Gas Water $ 32,218,208 $ 121,368,826 7,878,371 16,934,156 2,209,590 2,903,038 204,297 2,683,368 32,812,820 15,601,729 15,246,738 14,054,903 12,026,145 735,434 19,676,506 77,341,455 (594,612) 44,027,371 34,568 760,560 (767,315) (25,714,460) (50,713) (3,152,547) 47,070 136,132 638 7,528 657,537 (211,446) 56,266 643,387 (679,486) (26,873,309) 38,127 38,127 (1,235,971) 331,500 (865,193) (533,693) (1,769,664) 49,664,256 28,540 2,862,418 2,890,958 20,045,020 327,439 (4,891,099) (4,563,660) 15,481,360 411,185,421 (6,087,671) (11,785,771) 43,576,585 399,399,650 $ 41,806,921 $ 414,881,010 221 Wastewater Eliminations Exhibit 30-B Total $ 67,875,715 $ (1,719,525) $ 219,743,224 8,978,403 3,596,355 13,018,083 8,040,174 (1,719,525) 487,125 11,635,387 32,458,503 35,777,249 29,282,576 21,249,832 1,426,856 33,995,261 45,755,527 (1,719,525) 154,190,277 22,120,188 374,229 (10,003,659) (506,441) 110,095 2,786 866,691 (366,761) 507,583 (9,015,477) 2,905,362 2,905,362 16,010,073 1,119,907 (2,242,411) (1,122,504) 14,887,569 265,885,952 (7,464,296) 258,421,656 (1,447,346) 1,447,346 65,552,947 1,169,357 (36,485,434) (3,709,701) 293,297 10,952 1,524,228 (578,207) 1,207,236 (36,568,272) 28,540 5,767,780 38,127 5,834,447 34,819,122 331,500 (6,551,357) (6,219,857) 28,599,265 726,735,629 (25,337,738) 701,397,891 $ 273,309,225 $ $ 729,997,156 City of Corpus Christi UTILITY SYSTEM FUND COMBINING SCHEDULE OF CASH FLOWS YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Gas Water Wastewater Eliminations Total Cash flows from operating activities Receipts from customers 32,666,860 $ 118,956,163 67,248,177 $ -- $ 218,871,200 Receipts from interfund services provided 132,332 2,541,650 29,485 (1,719,525) 983,942 Payments to suppliers (18,483,109) (26,845,963) (15,535,773) -- (60,864,845) Payments to employees (7,023,899) (13,784,217) (8,002,583) -- (28,810,699) Internal activity - payments to other funds (4,363,508) (14,135,012) (10,156,883) 1,719,525 (26,935,878) Other receipts -- 1,000 -- 1,000 Net cash provided by operating activities 2,928,676 66,733,621 33,582,423 103,244,720 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities Changes in interfund borrowings -- (45,500,000) 17,000,000 -- (28,500,000) Transfers in from other funds 331,500 1,100,000 (1,100,000) 331,500 Transfers out to other funds (777,362) (4,871,192) (2,002,803) 1,100,000 (6,551,357) Net cash provided by (used for) noncapital financing activities (445,862) (50,371,192) 16,097,197 (34,719,857) Cash flows from capital and related financing activities Acquisition of capital assets (1,179,367) (76,208,607) (12,780,155) (90,168,129) Proceeds from sale of capital assets 53,236 136,132 110,095 299,463 Developers deposits -- (211,446) 866,691 655,245 Capital contributions 38,127 -- -- 38,127 Reimbursements to developers -- 657,537 (366,761) 290,776 Proceeds from issuance of revenue bonds 4,687,800 212,513,373 45,338,244 262,539,417 Principal paid on long-term debt (545,846) (27,115,773) (12,111,745) (39,773,364) Interest expense and fiscal charges (702,915) (26,464,380) (10,685,850) — (37,853,145) Recovery on damage claims 638 7,528 2,786 10,952 Net cash provided by capital and related financing activities 2,351,673 83,314,364 10,373,305 96,039,342 Cash flows from investing activities Investment income 38,568 842,890 404,977 1,286,435 Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and investments 4,873,055 100,519,683 60,457,902 165,850,640 Cash, cash equivalents and investments at beginning of year, including restricted accounts 10,148,799 166,931,883 75,309,476 252,390,158 Cash, cash equivalents and investments at end of year, including restricted accounts 15,021,854 $ 267,451,566 135,767,378 $ -- $ 418,240,798 (Continued) 222 City of Corpus Christi Gas Exhibit 30-C Water Wastewater Eliminations Total Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities Operating income (loss) (594,612) $ 44,027,371 22,120,188 $ $ 65,552,947 Adjustments to reconcile operating income to net cash provided by operating activities Depreciation 2,683,368 19,676,506 11,635,387 33,995,261 Amortization of water rights 2,025,374 2,025,374 Provision for uncollectible accounts 204,297 735,434 487,125 1,426,856 Operating costs paid from bond proceeds -- 7,500 -- 7,500 Changes in assets and liabilities Receivables 410,334 15,421 (598,348) (172,593) Inventory (203,348) (203,348) Deferred outflows of resources (365,355) (776,163) (303,059) (1,444,577) Accounts payable 40,181 (121,989) (145,193) (227,001) Accrued expenses (4,623) 31,861 (20,390) 6,848 Accumulated unpaid compensated absences (19,969) 203,989 (37,708) 146,312 Net pension liability 184,773 376,910 202,353 764,036 Net OPEB obligation 17,210 32,271 20,092 69,573 Deposits 170,649 290,215 293 461,157 Liability to claimants - escheat property -- (644) -- (644) Deferred inflows of resources 202,423 412,913 221,683 837,019 Net cash provided by operating activities 2,928,676 66,733,621 33,582,423 103,244,720 Noncash investing, capital and financing activities Change in fair value of investments $ 677 $ 71,682 $ 86,678 $ Change in accrued interest receivable $ -- $ 57,917 $ -- $ Contribution of capital assets $ -- $ 2,862,418 $ 2,905,362 $ Acquisition of capital assets under capital lease $ 972,680 $ -- $ -- $ Acquisition of capital assets accrued but not paid $ (74,207) $ (2,338,124) $ (3,110,030) $ Bond refunding $ 1,067,988 $ 115,191,543 $ 12,210,615 $ Bond issue costs $ 50,713 $ 3,152,547 $ 506,441 $ Transfers to realign bonds at refunding $ (87,831) $ 307,532 $ (219,701) $ Build America Bonds interest subsidy $ 56,266 $ 624,934 $ 507,583 $ Write-down of water rights due to refunding of underlying debt $ -- $ (1,574,240) $ -- $ 223 $ 159,037 $ 57,917 $ 5,767,780 $ 972,680 $ (5,522,361) $ 128,470,146 $ 3,709,701 $ 1,188,783 $ (1,574,240) City of Corpus Christi AIRPORT FUND STATEMENT OF NET POSITION SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 ASSETS Current assets Cash, cash equivalents and investments $ 5,627,279 Receivables Accounts 52,226 Intergovermental 1,555,103 Allowance for uncollectibles (39,670) Net receivables 1,567,659 Due from other funds 1,029,019 Inventories 29,637 Restricted assets Cash, cash equivalents and investments 4,789,432 Receivables Accounts 122,652 Total restricted assets 4,912,084 Total current assets 13,165,678 Noncurrent assets Capital assets Land 4,848,977 Buildings 56,366,341 Improvements other than buildings 85,968,155 Machinery and equipment 5,800,541 Total capital assets in service 152,984,014 Less accumulated depreciation (64,955,702) Net capital assets in service 88,028,312 Construction in progress 55,074,198 Net capital assets 143,102,510 Total noncurrent assets 143,102,510 Total assets 156,268,188 DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unamortized costs on refunded debt Deferred outflows related to pension liability Total deferred outflows of resources (Continued) 495,962 583,048 1,079,010 City of Corpus Christi LIABILITIES Current liabilities Accounts payable 65,688 Accrued expenses 101,183 Accrued interest 83,507 Contractor interest and retainage payable 6,902 Deposits 17,090 Unearned revenue 298,641 Current portion of long-term liabilities Long-term debt 1,215,000 Accumulated unpaid compensated absences 82,482 Total current liabilities 1,870,493 Noncurrent liabilities Long-term liabilities, net of current portion Long-term debt 25,442,464 Accumulated unpaid compensated absences 190,406 Net pension liability 4,556,768 Net OPEB obligation 81,960 Total noncurrent liabilities 30,271,598 Total liabilities 32,142,091 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred inflows related to pension liability 115,147 NET POSITION Net invested in capital assets 118,850,742 Restricted for Passenger facility charges projects 2,457,383 Law enforcement officers' standards and education 3,974 Unrestricted 3,777,861 Total net position $ 125,089,960 225 Exhibit 31-A City of Corpus Christi AIRPORT FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN NET POSITION YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Operating revenues Charges for services - net $ 8,248,587 Operating expenses Personal services 4,258,120 Materials and supplies 461,912 Contractual services 1,785,263 Other operating expenses 691,884 Uncollectible accounts 35,032 Depreciation 5,159,587 Total operating expenses 12,391,798 Operating loss (4,143,211) Nonoperating revenues (expenses) Investment income 35,833 Interest expense and fiscal charges (1,010,699) Passenger facility charges 1,322,682 Customer facility charges 974,746 Net gain on disposal of assets 3,222 Contributions from other governmental agencies 19,099 Total nonoperating revenues 1,344,883 Capital contributions Contribution from other governmental agencies 20,736,242 Contribution from others 43,726 Total capital contributions 20,779,968 Income before transfers 17,981,640 Transfers out (335,537) Net income 17,646,103 Net position at beginning of year 110,524,769 Prior period adjustment for change in accounting for pension liability (3,080,912) Adjusted net position at beginning of year 107,443,857 Net position at end of year $ 125,089,960 226 Exhibit 31-B City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 31-C AIRPORT FUND STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Cash flows from operating activities Receipts from customers $ 8,763,561 Payments to suppliers (2,651,284) Payments to employees (3,931,340) Internal activity - payments to other funds (1,073,688) Net cash provided by operating activities 1,107,249 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities Changes in interfund borrowings (1,029,019) Contributions from other governmental agencies 19,099 Transfers out to other funds (335,537) Net cash used for noncapital financing activities (1,345,457) Cash flows from capital and related financing activities Acquisition of capital assets (24,764,341) Proceeds from sale of capital assets 3,222 Contributions from other governmental agencies 20,155,204 Passenger facility charge 1,393,693 Customer facility charges 996,711 Principal paid on long-term debt (1,193,706) Interest expense and fiscal charges (1,002,718) Net cash used for capital and related financing activities (4,411,935) Cash flows from investing activities Investment income 38,533 Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and investments (4,611,610) Cash, cash equivalents and investments at beginning of year, including restricted accounts 15,028,321 Cash, cash equivalents and investments at end of year, including restricted accounts $ 10,416,711 Reconciliation of operating loss to net cash provided by operating activities Operating loss $ (4,143,211) Adjustments to reconcile operating loss to net cash provided by operating activities Depreciation 5,159,587 Provision for uncollectible accounts 35,032 Change in assets and liabilities Receivables 197,595 Inventory 4,741 Deferred outflows of resources (239,949) Accounts payable (108,981) Accrued expenses 5,899 Deposits (2,983) Accumulated unpaid compensated absences (28,228) Net pension liability 105,107 Net OPEB obligation 7,493 Deferred inflows of resources 115,147 Net cash provided by operating activities $ 1,107,249 Noncash investing, capital and financing activities Acquisition of capital assets accrued but not paid $ (1,350,760) 227 City of Corpus Christi NON -MAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF NET POSITION SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 ASSETS Current assets Cash, cash equivalents and investments Receivables Accounts Intergovermental Allowance for uncollectibles Net receivables Total current assets Golf Centers Marina Fund Fund 8,993 Total $ 384,453 $ 384,453 75,534 84,527 605,246 605,246 (50,585) (50,585) 8,993 630,195 639,188 8,993 1,014,648 1,023,641 Noncurrent assets Capital assets Land 94,337 9,000 103,337 Buildings 711,295 981,298 1,692,593 Improvements other than buildings 2,725,558 13,124,743 15,850,301 Machinery and equipment 1,152,863 358,442 1,511,305 Infrastructure -- 54,226 54,226 Total capital assets in service 4,684,053 14,527,709 19,211,762 Less accumulated depreciation (4,156,444) (8,613,985) (12,770,429) Net capital assets in service 527,609 5,913,724 6,441,333 Construction in progress -- 3,332,213 3,332,213 Net capital assets 527,609 9,245,937 9,773,546 Total noncurrent assets 527,609 9,245,937 9,773,546 Total assets DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unamortized loss on refunded debt Deferred outflows related to pension liability Total deferred outflows of resources (Continued) 536,602 10,260,585 10,797,187 33,011 33,011 88,215 88,215 121,226 121,226 City of Corpus Christi Golf Centers Marina Fund Fund Exhibit 32-A Total LIABILITIES Current liabilities Accounts payable $ 492 $ 10,250 $ 10,742 Accrued expenses -- 13,753 13,753 Accrued interest 15,221 15,221 Contractor interest and retainage payable 160,403 160,403 Deposits -- 133,598 133,598 Advances from other funds 770,688 770,688 Unearned revenue -- 27,391 27,391 Current portion of long-term liabilities Long-term debt 215,000 215,000 Accumulated unpaid compensated absences 22,490 22,490 Total cun-ent liabilities 771,180 598,106 1,369,286 Noncurrent liabilities Long-term liabilities, net of current portion Long -tern debt Accumulated unpaid compensated absences Net pension liability Net OPEB obligation Total noncurrent liabilities 5,064,357 38,642 704,160 14,412 5,064,357 38,642 704,160 14,412 5,821,571 5,821,571 Total liabilities 771,180 6,419,677 7,190,857 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred inflows related to pension liability NET POSITION Net invested in capital assets Unrestricted 527,609 (762,187) 17,765 17,765 3,999,591 4,527,200 (55,222) (817,409) Total net position $ (234,578) $ 3,944,369 $ 3,709,791 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 32-B NON -MAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS COMBINING SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN NET POSITION YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Golf Centers Marina Fund Fund Total Operating revenues Charges for services - net $ 204,936 $ 1,908,416 $ 2,113,352 Operating expenses Personal services -- 695,992 695,992 Materials and supplies 21,411 53,895 75,306 Contractual services 97,837 237,980 335,817 Other operating expenses 16,452 286,426 302,878 Uncollectible accounts -- 29,521 29,521 Depreciation 73,101 540,453 613,554 Total operating expenses 208,801 1,844,267 2,053,068 Operating income (loss) (3,865) 64,149 60,284 Nonoperating revenues (expenses) Investment income Bond issuance expense Interest expense and fiscal charges Net gain on disposal of assets Total nonoperating revenues (expenses) 256 256 6,607 6,863 (51,585) (51,585) (49,077) (49,077) 2,730 2,730 (91,325) (91,069) Capital contributions Contributions from other governmental agencies 605,246 605,246 Total capital contributions 605,246 605,246 Income (loss) before transfers (3,609) 578,070 574,461 Transfers out (4,606) (50,696) (55,302) Net income (loss) (8,215) 527,374 519,159 Net position at beginning of year (226,363) 3,887,277 3,660,914 Prior period adjustment for change in accounting for pension liability (470,282) (470,282) Adjusted net position at beginning of year (226,363) 3,416,995 3,190,632 Net position at end of year $ (234,578) $ 3,944,369 $ 3,709,791 City of Corpus Christi NON -MAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Golf Centers Marina Fund Fund Totals Cash flows from operating activities Receipts from customers $ 203,027 $ 1,882,603 $ 2,085,630 Payments to suppliers (118,755) (276,315) (395,070) Payments to employees -- (618,047) (618,047) Internal activity - payments to other funds (16,452) (373,405) (389,857) Net cash provided by operating activities 67,820 614,836 682,656 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities Advances from other funds 29,806 29,806 Transfers out to other funds (4,606) (50,696) (55,302) Net cash provided by (used for) noncapital financing activities 25,200 (50,696) (25,496) Cash flows from capital and related financing activities Acquisition of capital assets (93,276) (3,423,959) (3,517,235) Proceeds from sale of capital assets 2,730 2,730 Proceeds from sale of revenue bonds 2,548,415 2,548,415 Principal paid on long-term debt (290,000) (290,000) Interest expense and fiscal charges (93,342) (93,342) Net cash used for capital and related financing activities (93,276) (1,256,156) (1,349,432) Cash flows from investing activities Investment income 256 6,608 6,864 Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and investments (685,408) (685,408) Cash, cash equivalents and investments at beginning of year, including restricted accounts 1,069,861 1,069,861 Cash, cash equivalents and investments at end of year, including restricted accounts $ $ 384,453 $ 384,453 (Continued) City of Corpus Christi Golf Centers Marina Fund Fund Exhibit 32-C Totals Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities Operating income (loss) $ (3,865) $ 64,149 $ 60,284 Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities Depreciation 73,101 540,453 613,554 Provision for uncollectible accounts -- 29,521 29,521 Change in assets and liabilities Receivables (1,908) (27,228) (29,136) Deferred outflows of resources (35,196) (35,196) Accounts payable 492 6,346 6,838 Accrued expenses -- (3,882) (3,882) Customer deposits (1,369) (1,369) Unearned revenue 2,784 2,784 Accumulated unpaid compensated absences 3,472 3,472 Net pension liability 16,217 16,217 Net OPEB obligation 1,804 1,804 Deferred inflows of resources 17,765 17,765 Net cash provided by operating activities $ 67,820 $ 614,836 $ 682,656 Noncash investing, capital and financing activities Acquisition of capital assets accrued but not paid $ $ 160,403 $ 160,403 Bond issue costs $ $ 51,585 $ 51,585 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 Internal Service Funds Internal Service Funds Internal Service Funds finance and account for services, materials, and supplies furnished to the various departments of the City and, on a limited basis, to other local governmental agencies. These services are provided on a cost reimbursement basis. Stores Fund This fund maintains an inventory of commonly used materials and supplies and provides printing at a reasonable cost. Fleet Maintenance Service Fund This fund provides fleet purchasing and maintenance services to City departments. Facilities Maintenance Service Fund This fund was established to provide building maintenance services to City departments. Municipal Information Systems Fund This fund was established to provide data processing services to city departments and now further supports departments citywide through the automation of processes and the provision of wired and wireless data, voice and video communications. Liability and Employee Benefits Fund — This fund accumulates funds for the payment of liability and workers' compensation claims and various premiums for insurance coverage. This fund also accounts for the employee health insurance plans offered by the City. Engineering Services Fund — This fund provides complete engineering services to City departments. CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 City of Corpus Christi ASSETS Current assets Cash, cash equivalents and investments Receivables, net of allowance for uncollectibles Due from other funds Inventories Prepaid items Total current assets INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF NET POSITION SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Stores Municipal Fleet Facilities Information Maintenance Maintenance Systems $ $ 13,206,481 $ 2,742,462 $ 4,000,684 -- 1,414 -- -- -- -- 184,611 839,394 727,879 -- 839,394 13,934,360 2,743,876 4,185,295 Noncurrent assets Other assets Capital assets Land -- -- 66,359 Buildings 365,953 41,360 5,613,385 -- Improvements other than buildings -- 381,400 645,527 5,746,966 Machinery and equipment 74,436 39,947,101 283,733 4,987,745 Total capital assets in service 440,389 40,369,861 6,609,004 10,734,711 Less accumulated depreciation (290,524) (29,979,540) (4,624,822) (9,278,841) Net capital assets in service 149,865 10,390,321 1,984,182 1,455,870 Construction in progress -- -- -- 65,581 Net capital assets 149,865 10,390,321 1,984,182 1,521,451 Total noncurrent assets 149,865 10,390,321 1,984,182 1,521,451 Total assets DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred outflows related to pension liability 989,259 24,324,681 115,619 368,782 4,728,058 5,706,746 191,378 843,036 LIABILITIES Current liabilities Accounts payable 51,850 569,483 132,128 1,064,641 Accrued expenses 16,991 66,216 33,878 151,802 Current portion of estimated liability claims -- -- -- -- Deposits 4,648 Liability to claimants - escheat property -- -- Due to other funds 184,611 Unearned revenue -- Current portion of long-term liabilities Long-term debt -- -- 114,509 365,179 Accumulated unpaid compensated absences 48,696 73,710 39,958 217,188 Total current liabilities 302,148 714,057 320,473 1,798,810 Noncurrent liabilities Estimated liability claims, net of current portion Long-term liabilities, net of current portion Long-term debt -- -- 635,005 886,682 Accumulated unpaid compensated absences 26,135 184,636 48,681 635,814 Net pension liability 1,160,269 3,067,561 849,722 6,892,867 Net OPEB obligation 18,283 57,245 23,255 101,231 Total noncurrent liablities 1,204,687 3,309,442 1,556,663 8,516,594 Total liabilities DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred inflows related to pension liability NET POSITION Net invested in capital assets Unrestricted 1,506,835 4,023,499 23,417 72,377 1,877,136 10,315,404 36,673 168,021 149,865 10,390,321 1,234,668 269,590 (575,239) 10,207,266 1,770,959 (4,203,233) Net position $ (425,374) $ 20,597,587 $ 3,005,627 $ (3,933,643) 236 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 33-A Liability and Employee Engineering Benefits Services Eliminations Total $ 39,614,807 359,715 2,068,542 $ 1,056,157 $ 34,299 42,043,064 1,090,456 49,871 1,099 530,639 531,738 (271,421) 260,317 $ 60,620,591 395,428 (184,611) 1,567,273 2,068,542 (184,611) 64,651,834 49,871 67,458 6,020,698 6,773,893 45,823,654 58,685,703 (44,445,148) 14,240,555 65,581 260,317 14,306,136 49,871 260,317 14,356,007 42,092,935 1,350,773 (184,611) 79,007,841 144,182 511,417 2,174,414 420,754 14,700 2,253,556 98,000 91,771 458,658 7,752,096 -- 7,752,096 -- 4,648 19,344 -- 19,344 -- (184,611) -- 10,302 -- 10,302 43,565 30,220 126,790 523,253 536,562 8,330,716 276,826 (184,611) 11,558,419 6,990,306 6,990,306 -- 150,310 1,671,997 27,767 135,068 1,058,101 1,442,147 4,708,845 18,121,411 10,860,530 53,627 11,114,171 19,320,750 5,047,850 38,955,986 27,651,466 5,324,676 29,524 101,747 (184,611) 50,514,405 431,759 66,442 12,110,886 14,556,127 (3,630,675) 18,125,205 $ 14,556,127 $ (3,564,233) $ 30,236,091 237 City of Corpus Christi Operating revenues Charges for services - net INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN NET POSITION YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Stores Fleet Facilities Municipal Maintenance Maintenance Information Service Service Systems $ 1,341,385 $ 5,167,165 $ 4,162,144 $ 15,879,336 Operating expenses Personal services 825,070 2,712,946 1,328,820 6,550,104 Materials and supplies 158,721 937,373 174,311 772,171 Contractual services 235,380 1,234,045 1,582,945 9,587,791 Other operating expenses 190,416 311,662 265,826 759,486 Uncollectible accounts 27 Depreciation 12,569 2,943,463 517,859 640,759 Self-insurance claims -- -- -- -- Other post employment benefits Total operating expenses 1,422,156 8,139,489 3,869,761 18,310,338 Operating income (loss) (80,771) (2,972,324) 292,383 (2,431,002) Nonoperating revenues (expenses) Investment income 53,319 6,949 13,434 Interest expense and fiscal charges (690) (50,203) (34,467) Net gain (loss) on disposal of assets (51,918) 1,284 Recovery of damage claims 19,049 -- Total nonoperating revenues (expenses) 19,760 (41,970) (21,033) Income (loss) before transfers (80,771) (2,952,564) 250,413 (2,452,035) Transfers in 2,671,905 712,310 2,283,011 Transfers out (331,500) (234,357) -- Net transfers 2,340,405 477,953 2,283,011 Net income (loss) (80,771) (612,159) 728,366 (169,024) Net position at beginning of year 465,135 23,312,363 2,790,285 760,791 Prior period adjustment for change in accounting for pension liability (809,738) (2,102,617) (513,024) (4,525,410) Adjusted net position at beginning of year (344,603) 21,209,746 2,277,261 (3,764,619) Net position at end of year $ (425,374) $ 20,597,587 $ 3,005,627 $ (3,933,643) 238 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 33-B Liability and Employee Engineering Benefits Services Eliminations Totals $ 37,676,243 $ 6,778,047 $ $ 71,004,320 1,170,971 3,849,552 16,437,463 126,489 143,163 2,312,228 8,433,359 624,309 21,697,829 118,416 707,268 2,353,074 (46,424) (46,397) 40,380 4,155,030 30,157,544 -- 30,157,544 807,403 807,403 40,767,758 5,364,672 77,874,174 (3,091,515) 103,155 1,413,375 (6,869,854) 176,857 (3,089) (88,449) 2,272 (48,362) -- 19,049 103,155 (817) (2,988,360) (529,364) (529,364) 59,095 1,412,558 (6,810,759) 5,667,226 (1,095,221) 4,572,005 (3,517,724) 1,412,558 (2,238,754) 19,060,695 (1,753,611) 44,635,658 (986,844) (3,223,180) (12,160,813) 18,073,851 (4,976,791) 32,474,845 $ 14,556,127 $ (3,564,233) $ $ 30,236,091 239 City of Corpus Christi INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Stores Fleet Facilities Municipal Maintenance Maintenance Information Service Servicestem Sys Cash flows from operating activities Receipts from customers $ -- $ 7,672 $ 15,103 $ -- Receipts from interfund services provided 3,880,839 12,709,217 4,146,900 15,879,336 Payments to suppliers (2,728,173) (9,854,795) (1,659,947) (9,582,848) Payments to employees (739,225) (2,446,751) (1,238,162) (5,939,733) Internal activity - payments to other funds (341,978) (577,119) (381,454) (1,415,183) Claims paid — -- -- Other receipts 19,049 Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities 71,463 (142,727) 882,440 (1,058,428) Cash flows from noncapital financing activities Change in interfund borrowings (57,126) -- 327,017 Transfers in from other funds -- 712,310 2,283,011 Transfers out to other funds (234,357) -- Net cash provided by (used for) noncapital financing activities (57,126) 477,953 2,610,028 Cash flows from capital and related financing activities Acquisition of capital assets (14,337) (4,077,013) (207,330) (135,427) Proceeds from sale/disposal of capital assets -- 72,190 1,284 -- Transfer in from other funds for capital acquisition 2,671,905 -- Return of prior year transfers related to capital acquisition (331,500) -- -- Principal paid on long-term debt (101,917) (356,584) Interest expense and fiscal charges (690) (50,203) (34,467) Net cash provided by (used for) capital and related financing activity (14,337) (1,665,108) (358,166) (526,478) Cash flows from investing activities Interest on investments Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash, cash equivalents and investments at beginning of year Cash, cash equivalents and investments at end of year (Continued) 240 71,403 6,949 13,434 (1,736,432) 1,009,176 1,038,556 14,942,913 1,733,286 2,962,128 $ 13,206,481 $ 2,742,462 $ 4,000,684 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 33-C Liability and Employee Engineering Benefits Services Eliminations Total $ 8,902,596 $ 1,600 $ $ 8,926,971 28,474,167 6,776,447 71,866,906 (8,943,021) (771,180) (33,539,964) (1,067,471) (3,511,471) (14,942,813) (120,200) (1,040,570) (3,876,504) (27,430,088) (27,430,088) -- (34,298) (15,249) (184,017) 1,420,528 989,259 14,500,000 (269,891) 14,500,000 2,995,321 (529,364) (763,721) 13,970,636 (269,891) 107,571 13,894,190 25,720,617 (62,630) 2,272 (31,033) (3,089) 16,731,600 (4,496,737) 75,746 2,671,905 (331,500) (489,534) (88,449) (94,480) (2,658,569) 199,357 1,056,157 15,261,647 45,358,944 $ 39,614,807 $ 1,056,157 S $ 60,620,591 241 City of Corpus Christi INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Stores Fleet Facilities Municipal Maintenance Maintenance Information Service Service Systems Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities Operating income (loss) $ (80,771) $ (2,972,324) $ 292,383 $ (2,431,002) Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities Depreciation 12,569 2,943,463 517,859 640,759 Provision for uncollectible accounts -- -- 27 Recovery of damage claims 19,049 -- Changes in assets and liabilities Receivables -- -- (141) 48 Inventory 105,310 15,796 -- -- Prepaid items -- -- -- -- Deferred outflows of resources (27,840) (137,452) (128,467) (323,617) Accounts payable 30,872 (199,757) 75,827 625,351 Accrued expenses (10,027) 7,245 8,479 (14,992) Estimated claims liability -- -- -- -- Liability to claimants -escheat property Uneamed revenue -- -- -- -- Accumulated unpaid compensated absences (5,136) 38,459 44,384 111,913 Net pension liability 21,375 66,066 33,475 153,370 Net OPEB obligation 1,694 4,351 1,968 11,694 Deferred inflows of resources 23,417 72,377 36,673 168,021 Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities Noncash investing, capital and financing activities Change in fair value of investments Acquisition of capital assets under capital lease $ 71,463 $ (142,727) $ 882,440 $ (1,058,428) 242 $ 15,793 $ -- $ $ $ 33,406 $ City of Corpus Christi Exhibit 33-C (Continued) Liability and Employee Engineering Benefits Services Eliminations Total $ (3,091,515) $ 1,413,375 $ 40,380 (46,424) -- (201,606) (34,298) (439,939) -- (144,182) (155,651) 88,127 (28,518) (2,602) (3,850) 3,807,783 -- (801) 9,826 -- (19,088) (12,051) 136,025 92,877 (309,145) 6,517 29,524 101,747 $ (184,017) $ 1,420,528 $ 2,788 $ $ 224,907 $ (6,869,854) 4,155,030 (46,397) 19,049 (235,997) 121,106 (439,939) (917,209) 591,902 (15,747) 3,807,783 (801) 9,826 158,481 503,188 (282,921) 431,759 $ 989,259 $ 18,581 $ 258,313 243 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 Component Units Component Units The Coastal Bend Health Facilities Development Corporation is a public non-profit corporation created by State law to facilitate financing and development of health and health- related facilities. The Corpus Christi Convention and Visitors Bureau is a private Texas non-profit corporation organized for the purpose of promoting convention and visitors' activity in the Corpus Christi Bay area. CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 City of Corpus Christi ASSETS Cash, cash equivalents and investments Receivables Prepaid items Capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation Total assets LIABILITIES Accounts payable NET POSITION Invested in capital assets Restricted for Public health Unrestricted DISCRETELY PRESENTED COMPONENT UMTS COMBINING STATEMENT OF NET POSITION SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Coastal Bend Corpus Christi Health Facilities Convention Development and Visitors Corporation Bureau $ 3,719 3,719 3,719 $ 1,060,590 9,740 173,119 280,423 1,523,872 314,420 280,423 929,029 Exhibit 34-A Total $ 1,064,309 9,740 173,119 280,423 1,527,591 314,420 280,423 3,719 929,029 Total net position $ 3,719 $ 1,209,452 $ 1,213,171 246 City of Corpus Christi Expenditures/expenses Convention and visitor activities Total expenditures/expenses Program revenue Charges for services Net program expense DISCRETELY PRESENTED COMPONENT UMTS COMBINING STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Coastal Bend Corpus Christi Health Facilities Convention Development and Visitors Corporation Bureau Exhibit 34-B Total $ 5,113,108 $ 5,113,108 5,113,108 5,113,108 502,660 502,660 (4,610,448) (4,610,448) General revenue Earnings on investments 629 629 Payments from the City of Corpus Christi 4,959,744 4,959,744 Total general revenues 4,960,373 4,960,373 Change in net position 349,925 349,925 Net position beginning of year 3,719 859,527 863,246 Net position end of year $ 3,719 $ 1,209,452 $ 1,213,171 247 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 Capital Assets Capital Assets Used in the Operation of Governmental Funds City of Corpus Christi CAPITAL ASSETS USED IN THE OPERATION OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS SCHEDULE BY SOURCE SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 2015 Governmental funds capital assets Land $ 68,354,863 Buildings 231,883,519 Improvements other than buildings 241,546,242 Machinery and equipment 85,397,784 Infrastructure 366,084,953 Construction in progress 97,966,885 Total governmental funds capital assets $ 1,091,234,246 Investment in governmental funds capital assets by source Capital projects funds $ 873,517,309 General and special revenue funds 64,778,982 Donations 17,214,313 Developers contributions 25,085,237 Federal revenue sharing 82,732,222 Tax increment zone 22,861,080 Claim settlements 5,045,103 Total investment in governmental funds capital assets by source $ 1,091,234,246 * This schedule presents only the capital assets balances related to governmental funds. Accordingly, the capital assets reported in internal service funds are excluded from the above amounts and capital assets relating to solid waste activities are included. Generally, the capital assets of internal service funds are included as governmental activities and the Solid Waste capital assets are included as business -type activities in the statement of net assets. 249 Exhibit 35-A City of Corpus Christi CAPITAL ASSETS USED IN THE OPERATIONS OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS SCHEDULE BY FUNCTION AND ACTIVITY * SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Totals Improvements Machinery Other Than and Land Buildings Buildings Equipment Staff Agencies Finance $ 121,664 $ Meter reading 294,211 Planning 48,414 Total staff agencies 464,289 City Hall and Emergency Management Facility Municipal service center Miscellaneous 22,822,241 3,732,487 17,723,896 1,854,335 204,024 662,316 12,281,904 200,383 7,361,532 18,504 2,646,834 Exhibit 35-B Infrastructure $ 121,664 $ 294,211 48,414 464,289 1,347,354 987,995 2,073,155 Total general government 37,422,769 4,136,894 25,747,744 2,665,338 4,872,793 Police and municipal court Police Police Animal control Code enforcement Total police Municipal Court 20,861,249 3,604,319 45,412 24,510,980 2,325,928 8,054,487 3,432,801 2,325,928 11,487,288 2,838,210 7,642,624 171,518 45,412 2,838,210 7,859,554 180,191 26,410 31,282 122,499 Total police and municipal court 24,691,171 2,325,928 11,513,698 2,869,492 7,982,053 Fire 28,141,882 1,666,238 7,772,373 5,210,648 13,492,623 Ambulance 4,437,699 -- -- -- 4,437,699 Emergency management 25,014 -- -- -- 25,014 Building inspections 146,626 -- -- -- 146,626 Streets Streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters Street maintenance and construction Street signs and markings Harbor Bridge and approaches Total streets Solid Waste Health Parks, recreation and education Parks and recreation Miradores and Selena Memorial Senior services Upper level college facilities Total parks, recreation and education 341,157,064 15,520,939 -- 4,604,399 -- 8,509,375 266,937 128,442 -- 8,113,996 811,005 -- -- 35,428 775,577 7,322,587 64,110 7,258,477 -- 357,800,031 15,851,986 128,442 11,898,304 8,889,573 113,700,080 8,119,865 377,257 53,565,886 34,526,009 6,577,767 61,909 4,547,312 1,342,295 626,251 112,277,293 18,840,060 3,479,481 75,178,684 2,686,292 1,965,000 -- -- 1,965,000 -- 4,542,238 130,714 3,380,510 1,031,014 -- 1,510,810 1,510,810 -- 120,295,341 20,481,584 6,859,991 78,174,698 2,686,292 Libraries 18,225,672 773,001 17,049,483 277,978 125,210 (Continued) 250 321,031,726 321,031,726 17,111,063 12,092,776 12,092,776 City of Corpus Christi CAPITAL ASSETS USED IN THE OPERATIONS OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS SCHEDULE BY FUNCTION AND ACTIVITY * SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Totals Corpus Christi museums 8,300,022 Improvements Machinery Other Than and Land Buildings Buildings Equipment 6,488,324 1,315,824 495,874 Community enrichment Cultural and convention facilities Multipurpose arena 48,732,802 2,829,110 43,198,880 2,600,369 104,443 Auditorium 7,304,198 -- 7,262,070 -- 42,128 Baseball stadium 28,441,771 1,836,763 26,186,852 418,156 -- Harbor Playhouse 880,519 -- 869,675 -- 10,844 Convention center 63,994,029 798,244 52,722,805 3,828,642 6,644,338 Water Garden 1,499,927 -- -- 1,499,927 -- Bayfront Science Park 27,258,161 3,651,328 2,468,913 20,935,353 202,567 Texas State Aquarium 20,844,296 2,047,044 11,024,033 7,773,219 -- Total cultural and convention facilities 198,955,703 11,162,489 143,733,228 37,055,666 7,004,320 Public art 93,328 -- -- 93,328 Total community enrichment 199,049,031 Community development Neighborhood improvement Community Development Block Grant CC Housing Finance Corporation Corpus Christi Community Improvement Corp. Total community development 23,595 7,299,284 958,246 1,473,294 9,754,419 11,162,489 143,733,228 37,148,994 7,004,320 800,221 5,821,579 677,484 163,841 419,382 375,023 59,497 1,413,797 -- 1,023,559 7,654,758 23,595 1,052,507 23,595 Exhibit 35-B (Continued) Infrastructure Other general capital assets: Packery Channel 16,128,654 -- -- 215,414 63,852 15,849,388 Seawall 45,808,864 -- -- 45,808,864 -- -- Army Corp of Engineers office 10,909 -- 10,909 -- -- -- Naval Air Station safety zone 2,672,482 2,672,482 -- -- -- -- Transit facility 78,928 78,928 -- Total other general capital assets 64,699,837 2,751,410 10,909 46,024,278 63,852 15,849,388 Total capital assets in service 993,267,361 68,354,863 231,883,519 241,546,242 85,397,784 366,084,953 Less: accumulated depreciation 437,686,330 -- 91,264,552 109,083,405 64,950,509 172,387,864 Net capital assets in service 555,581,031 68,354,863 140,618,967 132,462,837 20,447,275 193,697,089 Construction in progress 97,966,885 -- 627,894 29,502,774 9,927 67,826,290 Total general capital assets $ 653,547,916 $ 68,354,863 $ 141,246,861 $ 161,965,611 $ 20,457,202 $ 261,523,379 * This schedule presents only the capital assets balances related to governmental funds. Accordingly, the capital assets reported in internal service funds are excluded from the above amounts and capital assets relating to solid waste activities are included. Generally, the capital assets of internal service funds are included as governmental activities and the Solid Waste capital assets are included as business -type activities in the statement of net assets. 251 City of Corpus Christi SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN CAPITAL ASSETS USED IN THE OPERATIONS OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS BY FUNCTION AND ACTIVITY YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Beginning Additions Balance and Transfers Retirements Exhibit 35-C Ending Balance General government Staff agencies Finance 167,795 46,131 121,664 Meter reading 355,719 -- 61,508 294,211 Planning 48,414 -- -- 48,414 Total staff agencies 571,928 -- 107,639 464,289 City Hall and Emergency Management Facility Municipal service center Miscellaneous Total general government 22,810,547 1,854,335 12,441,251 11,694 (159,347) 22,822,241 1,854,335 12,281,904 37,678,061 (147,653) 107,639 37,422,769 Police and municipal court Police 21,045,844 147,887 332,482 20,861,249 Animal control 3,625,733 (21,414) -- 3,604,319 Code enforcement - 45,412 45,412 Total police 24,671,577 171,885 332,482 24,510,980 Municipal court 192,691 12,500 180,191 Total police and muncipal court 24,864,268 171,885 344,982 24,691,171 Fire 24,586,201 3,581,288 25,607 28,141,882 Ambulance 4,766,157 -- 328,458 4,437,699 Emergency management 25,014 -- -- 25,014 Inspections 160,314 -- 13,688 146,626 Streets Streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters 328,260,181 12,896,883 -- 341,157,064 Street maintenance and construction 7,645,256 879,599 15,480 8,509,375 Street signs and markings 221,645 589,360 -- 811,005 Harbor Bridge and approaches 7,322,587 -- 7,322,587 Total streets 343,449,669 14,365,842 15,480 357,800,031 Solid Waste Health Parks, recreation and education Parks and recreation Miradores and Selena Memorial Senior services Upper level college facilities Total parks, recreation and education Libraries Corpus Christi museums (Continued) 111,239,229 3,638,841 1,177,990 113,700,080 6,577,767 6,577,767 110,484,168 1,965,000 4,542,238 1,510,810 1,888,924 118,502,216 1,888,924 18,187,834 95,799 112,277,293 1,965,000 4,542,238 1,510,810 95,799 120,295,341 37,838 18,225,672 8,266,546 33,476 -- 8,300,022 252 City of Corpus Christi SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN CAPITAL ASSETS USED IN THE OPERATIONS OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS BY FUNCTION AND ACTIVITY YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Beginning Additions Balance and Transfers Retirements Exhibit 35-C (continued) Ending Balance Community enrichment Cultural and convention facilities Multipurpose arena 48,628,359 104,443 48,732,802 Auditorium 7,304,198 -- 7,304,198 Baseball stadium 28,441,771 28,441,771 Harbor Playhouse 880,519 -- 880,519 Convention center 63,852,796 141,233 63,994,029 Water Garden 1,499,927 -- -- 1,499,927 Bayfront Science Park 27,266,115 7,954 27,258,161 Texas State Aquarium 20,844,296 -- 20,844,296 Total cultural and convention facilities 198,717,981 245,676 7,954 198,955,703 Public art Total community enrichment 93,328 93,328 198,811,309 245,676 7,954 199,049,031 Community development Neighborhood improvement 23,595 23,595 Community Development Block Grant 7,299,284 -- 7,299,284 CC Housing Finance Corporation 799,405 158,841 958,246 Corpus Christi Improvement Corp. 1,473,294 -- -- 1,473,294 Total community development 9,595,578 158,841 9,754,419 Other general capital assets: Packery Channel 15,913,240 215,414 16,128,654 Seawall 45,808,864 -- 45,808,864 Arany Corp of Engineers office 10,909 -- -- 10,909 Naval Air Station safety zone 2,672,482 -- -- 2,672,482 Transit facility 78,928 78,928 Total other general capital assets 64,484,423 215,414 64,699,837 Total capital assets in service Less: accumulated depreciation Net capital assets in service 971,194,586 24,190,372 414,126,930 25,665,206 2,117,597 993,267,361 2,105,806 437,686,330 557,067,656 (1,474,834) 11,791 555,581,031 Construction in progress 89,807,237 8,159,648 97,966,885 Total general capital assets $ 646,874,893 $ 6,684,814 $ 11,791 $ 653,547,916 * This schedule presents only the capital assets balances related to governmental funds. Accordingly, the capital assets reported in internal service funds are excluded from the above amounts and capital assets relating to solid waste activities are included. Generally, the capital assets of internal service funds are included as governmental activities and the Solid Waste capital assets are included as business -type activities in the statement of net assets. 253 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 Statistical Section City of Corpus Christi Statistical Section This part of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas' comprehensive annual financial report presents detailed information as a context for understanding what the information in the fmancial statements, note disclosures, and required supplementary information says about the government's overall financial health. Contents Financial Trends These schedules contain trend information to help the reader understand how the government's financial performance and well-being have changed over time. Page 256 Revenue Capacity 271 These schedules contain information to help the reader assess the government's most significant local revenue source, the property tax. Debt Capacity 278 These schedules present information to help the reader assess the affordability of the government's current levels of outstanding debt and the government's ability to issue additional debt in the future. Demographic and Economic Information 286 These schedules offer demographic and economic indicators to help the reader understand the environment within which the government's financial activities take place. Operating Information 288 These schedules contain service and infrastructure data to help the reader understand how the information in the government's financial report relates to the services the government provides and the activities it performs. Sources: Unless otherwise noted, the information in these schedules is derived from the comprehensive annual financial reports for the relevant years. 255 City of Corpus Christi CITY OF CORPUS CI3RISTI, TEXAS NET POSITION BY COMPONENT LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 Governmental activities Net invested in capital assets $ 95,591,014 $ 160,007,194 $ 171,559,799 $ 184,297,821 Restricted 5,085,156 7,161,689 8,706,284 Unrestricted 144,449,151 108,485,456 118,117,170 102,3 78,371 Total governmental activities net position $ 240,040,165 $ 273,577,806 $ 296,838,658 $ 295,382,476 Business -type activities Net invested in capital assets $ 505,475,536 $ 557,699,068 $ 614,734,623 $ 588,187,607 Restricted 28,524,868 20,698,409 17,162,129 15,547,632 Unrestricted 85,278,867 40,565,906 1,923,108 49,119,110 Total business -type activities net position $ 619,279,271 $ 618,963,383 $ 633,819,860 $ 652,854,349 Primary government Net invested in capital assets $ 601,066,550 $ 717,706,262 $ 786,294,422 $ 772,485,428 Restricted 28,524,868 25,783,565 24,323,818 24,253,916 Unrestricted 229,728,018 149,051,362 120,040,278 151,497,481 Total primary government net position $ 859,319,436 $ 892,541,189 $ 930,658,518 $ 948,236,825 * The City changed its fiscal year from July 31 to September 30 FY 2014 includes 14 months of operations 256 City of Corpus Christi Table 1 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014* 2015 $ 190,984,493 $ 209,725,506 $ 222,519,201 $ 240,668,349 $ 271,711,769 $ 268,379,713 81,610,847 79,572,803 85,445,854 89,422,908 90,284,166 110,426,731 19,260,356 29,215,682 37,839,536 52,514,581 43,044,907 (93,108,769) $ 291,855,696 $ 318,513,991 $ 345,804,591 $ 382,605,838 $ 405,040,842 $ 285,697,675 $ 685,455,079 $ 682,070,387 $ 693,363,853 $ 704,595,166 $ 793,058,216 $ 768,459,800 13,445,408 14,731,997 10,689,200 13,455,463 17,238,437 20,125,997 16,803,962 30,148,172 61,185,337 83,373,816 24,083,260 55,457,952 $ 715,704,449 $ 726,950,556 $ 765,238,390 $ 801,424,445 $ 834,379,913 $ 844,043,749 $ 876,439,572 $ 891,795,893 $ 915,883,054 $ 945,263,515 $ 1,064,769,985 $ 1,036,839,513 95,056,255 94,304,800 96,135,054 102,878,371 107,522,603 130,552,728 36,064,318 59,363,854 99,024,873 135,888,397 67,128,167 (37,650,817) $ 1,007,560,145 $ 1,045,464,547 $ 1,111,042,981 $ 1,184,030,283 257 $ 1,239,420,755 $ 1,129,741,424 City of Corpus Christi CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS CHANGES IN NET POSITION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 Expenses Primary government Governmental activities General government $ 18,932,482 $ 20,909,738 $ 20,658,739 $ 22,072,622 Police and municipal court 60,561,629 67,186,703 73,018,660 78,931,771 Fire and ambulance 33,180,982 37,478,787 38,221,888 42,520,139 Emergency management 2,392,096 358,799 470,593 525,077 Inspections 1,805,234 1,721,108 1,699,251 2,171,232 Streets 21,438,339 23,145,350 25,060,354 25,814,362 Health 6,416,746 6,126,090 6,856,261 7,450,418 Parks and recreation 19,253,871 18,933,077 21,455,686 21,767,352 Libraries 4,596,041 4,593,979 4,993,605 5,612,844 Museums 1,521,829 1,412,561 1,886,531 1,842,929 Community enrichment 1,500,961 1,784,029 2,624,646 3,476,141 Community development 6,228,409 4,114,411 4,594,232 5,830,606 Convention and visitor activities 18,437,872 18,615,167 18,134,378 17,167,605 Interest on long-term debt 17,291,116 14,713,700 14,665,318 14,950,035 Total governmental activities 213,557,607 221,093,499 234,340,142 250,133,133 Business -type activities Solid Waste Utilities Water Gas Wastewater Airport Golf Centers Marina Total business -type activities 11, 872,414 87,305,836 37,394,842 38,851,313 11,154,572 1,795,616 1,381,124 27,045,462 86, 542,198 36,919,568 39,548,014 10,991,302 1,780,434 1,692,618 189,755,717 204,519,596 20,075,708 94,885,353 38,128,913 42,411,241 11,555,900 1,948,903 1,806,755 18,442,528 97,638,099 31,286,452 43,450,764 12,228,908 2,133,840 1,864,063 210,812,773 207,044,654 Total primary government $ 403,313,324 $ 425,613,095 $ 445,152,915 $ 457,177,787 Program revenue Governmental activities Charges for services General government $ 20,293,609 $ 20,328,447 $ 21,120,037 $ 19,995,923 Public safety 16,365,087 18,053,712 18,582,177 19,328,378 Other activities 16,315,719 16,564,997 13,198,200 13,466,048 Operating grants and contributions 12,553,974 13,585,522 13,293,341 13,519,519 Capital grants and contributions 6,788,244 5,742,472 9,215,148 5,160,566 Total governmental activities program revenues 72,316,633 74,275,150 75,408,903 71,470,434 (Continued) 258 City of Corpus Christi Table 2 2010 $ 19,480,668 81,171,817 43,287,584 505,319 1,664,676 25,674,747 7,505,758 21,577,152 5,298,406 1,853,104 4,220,179 10,403,520 15,183,072 16,156,130 253,982,132 2011 $ 16,589,746 81,930,129 47,347,004 543,682 1,636,669 21,451,848 7,218,565 19,902,761 4,785,207 1,900,026 9,529,467 10,025,480 10,487,728 17,385,095 250,733,407 2012 $ 18,079,972 80,496,720 45,748,510 507,564 1,752,448 17,337,069 6,813,120 17,861,237 4,222,687 1,659,435 4,273,802 11,084,674 16,057,354 16,786,166 242,680,758 2013 $ 20,066,766 80,194,663 48,997,146 505,811 1,995,533 18,523,334 6,835,120 18,659,058 3,731,475 1,555,994 2,742,906 13,218,255 18,022,411 14, 875,186 2014 $ 23,528,625 106,771,633 58,864,749 632,347 2,182,793 29,657,466 6,661,113 22, 829,117 4,779,930 1,907,091 7,589,196 14,025,431 19,365,234 15,357,763 2015 $ 20,095,432 91,069,002 48,724,237 613,555 2,379,102 34,051,106 5,940,977 19,928,692 4,575,572 1,866,875 5,851,215 13,365,023 16,228,430 16,378,266 249,923,658 314,152,488 281,067,484 22,418,231 27,140,788 23,494,713 25,721,265 33,046,483 93,937,152 96,818,500 99,262,996 102,157,760 117,294,046 31,748,907 30,224,910 25,318,899 28,564,940 43,714,412 46,795,236 47,063,049 46,664,152 48,937,097 63,649,026 11,406,735 11,729,049 11,982,695 11, 899,650 15,412,742 2,051,107 1,168,875 293,633 241,504 198,341 1,861,705 1,793,695 1,802,521 1,757,820 2,185,278 210,219,073 215,938,866 208,819,609 219,280,036 275,500,328 29,152,032 107,235,791 34,256,774 56,892,815 13,631,297 214,575 1,997,197 243,380,481 $ 464,201,205 $ 466,672,273 $ 451,500,367 $ 469,203,694 $ 589,652,816 $ 524,447,965 $ 20,566,739 20,021,375 11,839,459 15,768,215 8,274,872 76,470,660 $ 22,093,237 19,349,804 13,090,388 20,293,248 11,616,793 86,443,470 $ 21,614,922 20,165,521 12,388,359 14,697,325 4,841,413 73,707,540 $ 24,054,154 20,948,126 15,605,078 12,516,057 7,645,930 80,769,345 $ 27,323,898 24,607,968 29,498,080 14,116,549 8,509,542 $ 25,920,218 20,189,446 27,444,915 9,899,152 7,911,826 104,056,037 91,365,557 City of Corpus Christi CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS CHANGES IN NET POSITION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2006 Program revenue (continued) Business -type activities Charges for services Solid Waste $ 24,187,529 Utilities Water 84,775,949 Gas 40,274,507 Wastewater 36,284,201 Airport 9,908,494 Golf Centers 2,242,033 Marina 1,222,145 Operating grants and contributions 8,634,637 Capital grants and contributions 12,018,013 Total business -type activities program revenues 219,547,508 Total primary government program revenues $ 291,864,141 2007 2008 2009 $ 26,641,520 $ 29,843,162 $ 30,979,626 75,147,044 87,131,217 106,536,846 40,694,377 43,166,492 33,159,669 38,833,360 41,784,614 45,227,800 9,764,349 9,948,929 8,562,286 1,740,134 1,943,751 1,732,263 1,326,631 1,436,603 1,592,825 105,065 47,668 495,845 26,818,057 24,436,963 7,863,922 221,070,537 239,739,399 236,151,082 $ 295,345,687 $ 315,148,302 $ 307,621,516 Net (expense) revenue Governmental activities $ (141,240,974) $ (146,818,349) $ (158,931,239) $ (178,662,699) Business -type activities 29,791,791 16,550,941 28,926,626 29,106,428 Total primary government net expenses S (111,449,183) $ (130,267,408) $ (130,004,613) $ (149,556,271) General revenues and other changes in net position Governmental activities Taxes Property taxes, levied for general purpo $ 50,834,041 Property taxes, levied for debt service 20,470,482 Sales taxes 61,261,030 Hotel occupancy taxes 9,408,919 Unrestricted investment earnings 5,423,353 Transfers 16,259,591 Total governmental activities 163,657,416 Business -type activities Unrestricted investment earnings 6,798,421 Transfers (16,259,591) Total business -type activities (9,461,170) $ 51,477,867 $ 52,288,456 22,105,552 25,021,687 66,124,730 70,120,506 9,630,152 10,337,342 7,321,196 6,220,124 18,759,642 18,203,976 175,419,139 182,192,091 7,120,196 (18,759,642) (11,639,446) Total primary government $ 154,196,246 $ Changes in Net Position Governmental activities Business -type activities Total primary government $ 22,416,442 20,330,621 $ 42,747,063 * The City changed its fiscal year from July 31 to September 30 FY 2014 includes 14 months of operations 4,133,827 (18,203,976) (14,070,149) $ 55,410,412 26,278,717 71,018,975 10,127,333 2,825,071 11,546,009 177,206,517 1,474,070 (11,546,009) (10,071,939) 163,779,693 $ 168,121,942 $ 167,134,578 $ 28,600,790 4,911,495 $ 23,260,852 14, 856,477 $ (1,456,182) 19,034,489 $ 33,512,285 $ 38,117,329 $ 17,578,307 260 City of Corpus Christi Table 2 (Continued) 2010 $ 32,011,959 $ 96,571,762 36,520,847 51,048,604 8,594,836 1,838,093 1,572,406 120,435 9,557,122 237,836,064 $ 314,306,724 2011 34,593,348 108,948,434 31,828,023 54,884,681 9,503,417 1,060,795 1,464,629 1,193,227 7,736,648 251,213,202 2012 $ 37,864,068 120,017,362 26,139,159 59,662,102 9,520,245 416,750 1,832,336 1,320,294 9,858,001 266,630,317 $ 337,656,672 $ 2013 $ 37,122,282 117,230,522 28,950,470 59,323,805 9,489,992 350,592 1,851,612 1,537,735 16,637,935 272,494,945 340,337,857 $ 2014* $ 43,677,779 140,078,315 42,408,214 75,704,726 11,919,295 257,772 2,227,983 1,379,860 17,942,344 335,596,288 353,264,290 $ 2015 $ 37,475,401 121,958,577 32,265,916 68,488,526 10, 549,237 204,936 1,911,146 1,226,335 27,219,660 301,299,734 439,652,325 $ 392,665,291 $ (177,511,472) $ (164,289,936) $ (168,973,217) $ (156,882,225) $ (210,096,450) $ (189,701,926) 27,616,991 35,274,336 57,810,708 50,372,518 60,095,960 57,919,253 $ (149,894,481) $ 57,291,695 27,358,566 64,654,960 9,919,560 1,283,513 13,476,398 173,984,692 825,924 (13,476,398) (12,650,474) $ (129,015,600) $ (111,162,509) $ (106,509,707) $ 57,457,988 27,192,025 70,432,482 10,721,997 682,991 24,460,749 190,948,232 432,520 (24,460,749) (24,028,229) $ 161,334,218 $ $ 58,201,084 25,906,607 79,403,692 12,051,548 848,062 19,852,825 196,263,818 329,951 (19,852,825) (19,522,874) 166,920,003 $ $ (3,526,780) $ 14,966,517 26,658,296 11,246,107 $ 11,439,737 $ $ 60,506,596 26,605,837 86,163,292 13,174,824 1,208,748 20, 674,272 208,333,569 445,360 (20,228,912) (19,783,552) 176,740,944 $ $ 27,290,601 38,287,834 37,904,403 $ $ (150,000,490) $ (131,782,673) $ 64,808,014 31,855,785 103,372,472 17,066,868 1,244,127 19,380,059 237,727,325 344,764 (19,035,295) (18,690,531) 188,550,017 $ $ 69,730,902 34,255,712 89,126,468 15,110,411 1,277,826 14,953,233 224,454,552 1,217,295 (14,953,233) (13,735,938) 219,036,794 $ 210,718,614 $ 31,429,175 $ 27,630,875 36,186,054 41,060,665 65,578,435 $ 67,615,229 $ 261 $ 34,752,626 44,183,315 68,691,540 $ 78,935,941 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 City of Corpus Christi Table 3 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES TAX REVENUES BY SOURCE LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (accrual basis of accounting) Year Property tax Sales tax Hotel tax Total 2006 $ 71,304,523 $ 61,261,030 $ 9,408,919 $ 141,974,472 2007 73,583,419 66,124,730 9,630,152 149,338,301 2008 77,310,143 70,120,506 10,337,342 157,767,991 2009 81,689,129 71,018,975 10,127,333 162,835,437 2010 84,650,261 64,654,960 9,919,560 159,224,781 2011 84,650,013 70,432,482 10,721,997 165,804,492 2012 84,107,691 79,403,692 12,051,548 175,562,931 2013 87,112,433 86,163,292 13,174,824 186,450,549 2014* 96,663,799 103,372,472 17,066,868 217,103,139 2015 103,986,614 89,126,468 15,110,411 208,223,493 * The City changed its fiscal year from July 31 to September 30 FY 2014 includes 14 months of operations 263 City of Corpus Christi CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS FUND BALANCE OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (modified accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 General fund Reserved $ 2,477,879 $ 4,054,101 $ 4,638,291 $ 2,938,429 Unreserved 24,534,599 28,372,503 27,571,509 27,325,624 Nonspendable Restricted Committed Assigned Unassiged Total general fund $27,012,478 $ 32,426,604 $ 32,209,800 $ 30,264,053 All other governmental funds Reserved $46,933,550 $ 60,621,159 $ 57,031,756 $ 58,028,080 Unreserved, reported Debt service funds 5,834,111 6,846,970 11,712,600 9,456,925 Special revenue funds 26,358,642 30,461,934 43,057,821 45,533,073 Capital projects funds 67,191,943 67,507,979 61,947,382 109,247,126 Nonspendable Special revenue funds Restricted Debt service funds Special revenue funds Capital projects funds Committed Debt service funds Special revenue funds Capital projects funds Assigned, reported in: Special revenue funds Capital projects funds Unassiged, reported in: Special revenue funds Capital projects funds Total all other governmental funds Notes $146,318,246 $ 165,438,042 $ 173,749,559 $ 222,265,204 The City implemented GASB Statement No. 54 "Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Defmitions" in fiscal year 2011. Fiscal year 2010 amounts restated to conform to the new statement requirements. The City changed its fiscal year from July 31 to September 30 FY 2014 includes 14 months of operations City of Corpus Christi Table 4 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014* 2015 $ 361,507 $ 1,491,399 $ 1,400,017 $ 1,302,980 $ 1,614,482 $ 1,272,561 688,286 636,531 249,433 298,854 363,996 389,177 19,701,535 19,813,473 28,764,934 40,537,505 37,808,621 39,564,995 17,747 5,845 6,806 11,480 658,480 10,120,144 8,579,370 8,617,684 7,551,298 11,441,898 11,538,642 174,624 $ 29,348,445 $ 30,564,932 $ 37,972,488 $ 53,592,717 $ 51,984,221 $ 51,521,501 $ 1,008,008 5,974,622 71,202,025 105,026,981 11,271,942 677,007 10,109,487 98,347 3,445,097 (1,415,142) $ 890,963 $ 5,956,307 74,267,207 70,969,215 13,812,320 390,454 8,413,784 214,601 1,855,964 (269,136) 396,787 $ 269,194 $ 789,937 $ 593,824 5,334,218 79,862,203 84,525,622 16,858,822 896,775 7,400,034 5,311,931 5,335,454 6,153,453 83,812,123 84,449,297 103,457,997 87,898,420 116,444,974 193,692,270 15,512,834 8,660,390 10,777,534 739,729 13,435,512 20,343,465 10,014,964 4,466,229 3,303,368 68,775 1,459,793 1,576,765 2,447,588 2,218,850 1,996,938 11,716,955 1,643,682 (555,032) $ 207,398,374 $ 176,501,679 - (9,890) (314,479) (196,948) $ 197,007,054 $ 207,015,926 $ 246,561,034 $ 342,206,343 City of Corpus Christi CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Fiscal Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 Revenues Taxes and business fees $ 158,452,760 $ 165,980,510 $ 174,899,312 $ 178,669,539 Licenses and permits 3,493,616 3,399,993 3,576,249 3,700,195 Intergovernmental Grants 14, 53 5,800 16,261,424 18,216,186 15,981,072 Charges for services 50,520,423 53,669,631 54,989,566 56,843,501 Fines and forfeitures 6,118,520 6,907,942 6,825,170 6,897,078 Deposits 1,093,803 270,716 191,724 Contributions and donations 2,589,488 1,948,807 3,380,012 1,902,087 Special assessments 118,526 74,235 442,323 10,502 Earnings on investments 5,447,570 8,424,738 6,386,948 3,006,163 Interest on loans 31,771 374,210 233,846 73,369 Payments from Lexington Museum Association 352,849 347,173 248,868 285,022 Payments from Corpus Christi Convention and Visitors Bureau 272,234 - - Payments from Texas State Aquarium 500,427 518,117 508,685 518,318 Payments from other agencies 7,425 - - Sale of city property 3,230 4,940 12,353 3,848 Claim settlement - - 572,280 Naming rights 175,000.0 175,000 175,000 175,000 Miscellaneous 979,929 1,186,020 1,390,645 1,486,339 Total revenues 244,693,371 259,543,456 271,476,887 270,124,313 Expenditures General government 18,961,633 20,707,495 21,306,706 21,836,700 Public safety 101,805,112 107,360,877 110,663,675 115,375,541 Streets 13,056,076 13,502,624 14,233,051 15,951,618 Solid waste 13,569,912 15,192,042 18,278,582 17,027,712 Health 6,452,124 5,980,026 6,592,800 6,893,718 Community enrichment 30,008,152 27,458,882 31,248,848 31,864,343 Convention and visitors activities 13,794,220 13,782,313 13,193,524 12,152,309 Other - - 32,963 Capital projects 46,907,032 33,406,955 35,812,462 57,193,877 Debt service Principal retirement 24,697,600 26,918,876 24,853,049 36,741,227 Interest 15,746,138 16,657,960 17,480,632 16,433,417 Paying agent fees 24,746 36,049 33,994 32,598 Bond issue cost 589,508 650,025 730,903 1,571,419 Refund of bond issue cost (9,660) - Interest on interfund borrowings 80,169 148,160 - 29,714 Total expenditures 285,692,422 281,792,624 294,428,226 333,137,156 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures (Continued) (40,999,051) (22,249,168) 266 (22,951,339) (63,012,843) City of Corpus Christi Table 5 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014* 2015 $ 176,286,722 3,288,415 22,661,016 56,945,655 6,766,301 871,524 76,876 1,312,814 81,458 272,796 361,107 7,553 175,000 1,703,701 $ 182,810,584 $ 192,423,958 $ 205,059,544 $ 241,447,636 $ 229,613,790 4,885,342 4,790,610 5,697,321 6,119,404 7,653,287 2,427,736 24,095,434 16, 542,865 14,743,346 17,75 8,224 13,043,094 60,258,877 63,684,332 63,588,154 85,604,995 75,150,621 6,075,772 6,602,755 7,037,629 8,739,406 6,330,735 7,133,489 2,413,204 4,657,640 4,319,251 1,833,351 683,087 46,787 154,937 195,495 67,952 698,992 713,791 1,186,389 1,245,152 1,288,658 85,188 86,173 109,704 97,778 59,282 275,647 267,750 - 373,232 358,795 369,082 335,694 328,276 9,786 - 122,746 46,779 325,395 25,241 - 2,291,231 1,716,081 1,682,319 1,734,789 2,657,325 270,810,938 290,002,056 289,647,101 304,311,307 20,267,240 17,606,974 119,589,404 126,279,109 14,797,896 15,229,881 18,193,629 22,426,863 6,977,548 6,722,783 37,348,135 36,680,864 10,257,006 10,449,447 21,729 - 50,406,384 51,119,929 26,883,223 26,445,859 19,907,675 20,115,642 28,710 25,009 422,041 - 6,543 2,489 325,107,163 367,720,570 340,500,886 19,146,965 21,235,824 23,789,840 20,900,904 122,341,347 129,637,141 159,126,383 141,825,393 13,173,204 14,964,156 22,088,359 27,361,691 19,288,307 20,551,190 26,657,490 23,153,110 6,362,130 6,554,474 6,106,257 5,569,931 33,660,941 35,347,147 40,617,305 36,297,592 11,046,785 11,650,650 16,821,790 14,625,022 51,039,961 45,303,572 41,280,111 27,257,727 26,278,182 26,319,507 38,617,547 36,325,072 19,178,232 19,789,403 28,954,177 18,284,677 19,541 13,983 21,162 47,011 574,317 2,362,185 704,331 789,195 773 102 - 333,104,849 322,110,685 (54,296,225) (43,102,793) 333,729,334 404,784,752 352,437,325 (32,463,584) (29,418,027) (37,064,182) (11,936,439) City of Corpus Christi CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (modified accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 Other financing sources (uses) Capital leases 2,917,492 3,447,512 2,623,408 3,746,061 General obligation bonds issued 34,975,000 - 88,725,000 Revenue bonds issued 2,900,000 - - Certificate of obligation bonds issued 18,605,000 2,415,695 - 12,000,000 Tax notes issued - - 22,260,000 - Refunding bonds issued 13,445,000 - Refund on bond issue costs 19,952 - - Premium on bonds sold 480,163 - 2,660,797 Premium on refunding bonds sold (272,896) - - (124,206) Payment to escrow agent for refunded bonds - (12,822,371) Transfers in 12,291,674 14,031,497 13,676,363 11,797,397 Transfers out (6,464,810) (8,276,245) (8,136,348) (9,222,308) Total other financing sources (uses) 29,996,412 47,073,622 31,046,052 109,582,741 Net change in fund balances Debt service as a percentage of noncapital expenditures * The City changed its fiscal year from July 31 to September 30 FY 2014 includes 14 months of operations $ (11,002,639) $ 24,824,454 $ 8,094,713 $ 46,569,898 17.23% 17.88% 268 16.67% 19.86% City of Corpus Christi Table 5 (Continued) 2010 4,110,898 13,685,000 11,460,000 491,894 18,699,972 (9,933,977) 2011 2012 2013 2014* 2015 5,655,103 1,978,382 5,092,527 6,384,598 4,808,866 - 44,706,446 75,417,146 90,520,000 7,390,000 6,607,854 9,000,000 164,010,000 38,395,000 2,137,681 - 5,095,844 9,251,134 11,935,763 9,751,466 - 6,607,854 - - (170,325,943) (41,763,200) (2,137,681) 17,734,081 13,102,987 16,377,480 31,066,578 29,593,646 (9,966,600) (11,897,146) (8,067,769) (26,767,619) (27,554,958) 38,513,787 13,422,584 60,376,513 104,970,283 28,251,119 107,119,020 $ (15,782,438) $ (29,680,209) $ 27,912,929 $ 75,552,257 $ (8,813,063) $ 95,182,581 17.20% 16.52% 16.99% 16.81% 18.79% 17.05% City of Corpus Christi CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL TAX AND BUSINESS FEES BY SOURCE LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (modified accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year Property tax Sales tax Hotel tax Business fees Other taxes Total Table 6 2006 71,213,224 60,092,032 9,408,919 16,569,587 1,168,998 158,452,760 2007 75,818,774 62,563,386 9,630,152 16,738,947 1,229,251 165,980,510 2008 79,970,549 65,972,519 10,337,342 17,322,510 1,296,392 174,899,312 2009 84,999,120 66,054,244 10,127,333 16,126,005 1,362,837 178,669,539 2010 87,962,604 60,085,182 9,919,560 17,107,197 1,212,179 176,286,722 2011 84,486,667 62,918,359 10,721,997 17,013,187 1,320,031 176,460,241 2012 86,746,312 75,807,495 12,051,548 16,622,313 1,196,290 192,423,958 2013 114,472,724 55,062,320 13,174,824 17,459,280 1,242,702 201,411,849 2014* 130,557,894 67,848,448 17,066,868 20,105,005 1,717,578 237,295,794 2015 132,821,540 58,332,449 15,110,411 17,284,167 1,750,491 225,299,058 * The City changed its fiscal year from July 31 to September 30 FY 2014 includes 14 months of operations 270 City of Corpus Christi Table 7 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS ASSESSED VALUE AND ESTIMATED ACTUAL VALUE OF TAXABLE PROPERTY LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Assessed Total Estimated Value as a Less: Total Direct Actual Percentage Fiscal Tax Real Personal Exempt Taxable Tax Taxable of Actual Year Year Property Property Property Assessed Value Rate Value Value 2006 2005 11,130,529,932 1,230,303,736 1,872,808,840 10,488,024,828 0.625799 12,360,833,668 84.84% 2007 2006 12,166,239,146 1,247,502,997 1,992,436,225 11,421,305,918 0.602372 13,413,742,143 85.15% 2008 2007 14,084,066,107 1,447,200,791 2,420,434,047 13,110,832,851 0.563846 15,531,266,898 84.42% 2009 2008 14,738,455,220 1,481,661,131 2,406,781,337 13,813,335,014 0.563846 16,220,116,351 85.16% 2010 2009 15,599,675,802 1,523,844,670 2,682,910,732 14,440,609,740 0.563846 17,123,520,472 84.33% 2011 2010 15,899,330,012 1,462,945,239 3,462,137,714 13,900,137,536 0.582269 17,362,275,250 80.06% 2012 2011 15,640,922,141 2,255,975,300 3,811,092,543 14,085,804,898 0.570557 17,896,897,441 78.71% 2013 2012 16,807,133,905 2,395,143,389 4,815,901,196 14,386,376,098 0.570557 19,202,277,294 74.92% 2014 * 2013 17,894,721,416 2,834,832,285 5,193,782,533 15,535,771,168 0.585264 20,729,553,701 74.95% 2015 2014 19,389,932,582 3,007,303,098 5,428,134,963 16,969,100,717 0.585264 22,397,235,680 75.76% The City changed its fiscal year from July 31 to September 30 Exemptions include: residential homestead exemptions including exemptions granted to persons disabled and/or 65 years of age and older; exemptions granted to disabled and deceased veterans; productivity value loss; tax abatements; and House Bill 366 exemptions. Exemptions are granted to disabled veterans or their survivors based upon percent of disability with a minimum exemption of $5,000 and a maximum exemption of $12,000. Mobile homes, while classified as personal property, may be residential homesteads. Source: Nueces County Appraisal District 271 City of Corpus Christi CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS PROPERTY TAX RATES - DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTS PER $100 VALUATION FISCAL YEARS 2005-2014 City of City of Corpus Nueces Corpus Corpus Total Christi County Christi Christi City of Corpus Junior Flour Farm Roads Fiscal Tax General Debt Corpus Calallen Christi College Bluff London Nueces and Flood Year Year Fund Service Christi ISD ISD District ISD ISD County Control 2005 2004 0.460000 0.174175 0.634175 1.599000 1.620000 0.233800 1.526200 1.249000 0.424200 0.005500 2006 2005 0.426624 0.199175 0.625799 1.599000 1.616000 0.228327 1.526197 1.390600 0.398929 0.005167 2007 2006 0.403197 0.199175 0.602372 1.430000 1.486000 0.255723 1.386650 1.277300 0.365932 0.004746 2008 2007 0.364671 0.199175 0.563846 1.276500 1.176050 0.241782 1.069500 1.143800 0.351340 0.004338 2009 2008 0.364671 0.199175 0.563846 1.298500 1.237350 0.251391 1.069215 1.210400 0.350930 0.004329 2010 2009 0.364671 0.199175 0.563846 1.298500 1.237350 0.251391 1.069215 1.210400 0.350930 0.004329 2011 2010 0.385131 0.197138 0.582269 1.298500 1.237350 0.258003 1.069778 1.249503 0.350930 0.004329 2012 2011 0.380339 0.190218 0.570557 1.328500 1.237350 0.258003 1.071743 1.262900 0.350999 0.004260 2013 2012 0.376806 0.208458 0.585264 1.358500 1.237350 0.250666 1.178499 1.251100 0.340999 0.004188 2014 2013 0.376806 0.208458 0.585264 1.358500 1.237350 0.248073 1.168499 1.395100 0.330945 0.004188 Note: Data presented is received from Nueces County Tax Assessor -Collector. 272 City of Corpus Christi Nueces County Nueces Emergency County Services Hospital District 1 District 0.060000 0.225000 0.075000 0.174903 0.075000 0.160715 0.100000 0.144782 0.100000 0.154687 0.100000 0.154687 0.100000 0.162428 0.100000 0.162428 0.100000 0.148077 0.100000 0.137455 Table 8 Nueces County Port of Water Downtown Downtown Corpus Control & Port Tuloso Management Management Christi Improv. Aransas Robstown Midway West Oso District District Authority District 4 ISD ISD ISD ISD Land Improvements 1.557800 1.714000 1.724700 1.900000 -- 1.550000 1.714000 1.742200 1.780000 -- -- 1.394582 1.584000 1.612200 1.650000 -- -- 1.058300 1.254000 1.332200 1.340000 -- -- 1.058300 1.374000 1.332200 1.420000 0.300000 0.070000 1.058300 1.374000 1.332200 1.420000 0.300000 0.070000 1.062300 1.523000 1.332200 1.420000 0.300000 0.070000 1.063300 1.650000 1.332200 1.420000 0.300000 0.070000 1.125550 1.630000 1.317410 1.347000 0.300000 0.070000 1.125550 1.645400 1.394500 1.450000 0.300000 0.070000 273 City of Corpus Christi CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS PRINCIPAL PROPERTY TAXPAYERS SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 AND JULY 31, 2006 2015 2006 Table 9 Percentage Percentage Of Total Of Total Taxable Taxable Assessed Assessed Assessed Assessed Name of Taxpayer Valuation Rank Value Valuation Rank Value Barney M. Davis $ 207,823,150 1 0.011329 American Electric Power Texas Central Co. 187,514,879 2 0.010222 169,810,000 1 0.016191 Corpus Christi Retail Venture LP 94,713,652 3 0.005163 Flint Hills Resources LP 85,711,318 4 0.004672 H.E. Butt Grocery Company 83,292,552 5 0.004540 68,814,898 2 0.006561 Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust 83,002,250 6 0.004525 Markwest Javelina Pipeline Company 66,054,480 7 0.003601 67,975,610 3 0.006481 Bay Area Healthcare 64,639,140 8 0.003524 58,248,024 6 0.004217 AirProducts,LLC 43,125,150 9 0.002351 Orion Drilling LP 36,740,000 10 0.002003 Padre Staples Mall, LP 63,438,255 4 0.006049 Southwestern Bell Telephone 59,661,690 5 0.005689 TRT Development Company 36,542,518 9 0.003484 Wal-Mart Stores 49,704,759 7 0.004739 SABCO Operating Company 36,547,710 8 0.003485 Columbia Bay Area realty Ltd 32,805,482 10 0.003128 $ 952,616,571 Source: Nueces County Appraisal District 5.19% $ 643,548,946 6.00% 274 City of Corpus Christi Table 10 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Fiscal Year Ended July 31 Collected within the Through 2013 Fiscal Year of the Levy Collections in Total Collections to Date September 30 Percentage Subsequent Percentage 2015 Tax Year Tax Levy Amount of Levy Years Amount of Levy 2006 2005 $ 65,237,253 $ 62,656,806 96.04% $ 2,407,623 $ 65,064,429 99.74% 2007 2006 68,230,749 64,961,636 95.21% 3,094,607 68,056,243 99.74% 2008 2007 72,029,119 70,048,380 97.25% 1,782,630 71,831,010 99.72% 2009 2008 76,595,854 74,146,566 96.80% 2,170,711 76,317,277 99.64% 2010 2009 79,537,895 77,079,808 96.91% 2,143,477 79,223,285 99.60% 2011 2010 78,777,938 76,795,311 97.48% 1,631,438 78,426,749 99.55% 2012 2011 78,407,330 76,679,885 97.80% 1,509,081 78,188,966 99.72% 2013 2012 80,578,771 78,780,900 97.77% 1,460,395 80,241,295 99.58% 2014 2013 89,055,903 87,538,705 98.30% 797,470 88,336,175 99.19% 2015 2014 96,965,649 95,351,963 98.34% - 95,351,963 98.34% 275 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 City of Corpus Christi Table 11 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS ADOPTED TAX RATE LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Fiscal Year Ended Tax Total Assessed Assessments Gross September 30 Year Valuation Rate Tax Rate (1) 2006 2005 $ 13,110,832,851 2007 2006 13,813,335,014 2008 2007 14,440,609,740 2009 2008 13,900,137,536 2010 2009 14,085,804,898 2011 2010 14,386,376,098 2012 2011 15,535,771,168 2013 2012 16,969,100,717 2014 2013 15,535,771,168 2015 2014 16,969,100,716 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (1) As permitted by the Constitution of the State of Texas, home rule cities of over 5,000 population shall have a total tax allowable of $2.50 and shall have a bond allowable of $1.50 per $100 valuation (unless City Charter provides less). The State allowables are computed based on 90% collections. On April 3, 1993, the citizens of Corpus Christi voted to amend the City Charter which contained a tax limitation of of $0.68 per $100 of assessed valuation for all purposes including debt service. The amended Charter provided for the tax rate to increase up to the State limit for voter approved debt after April 4, 1993. 277 0.625799 0.602372 0.563846 0.563846 0.563846 0.582269 0.570557 0.570557 0.585264 0.585264 City of Corpus Christi CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS RATIOS OF OUTSTANDING DEBT BY TYPE LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Governmental Activities Fiscal Year General Priority Other Ended Obligation Certificates of Revenue Capital Notes September 30 Bonds Obligation Bonds Leases Payable 2006 $ 149,085,000 $ 32,480,000 $ 120,810,000 $ 6,525,617 $ 4,360,000 2007 166,575,000 32,925,695 117,030,000 11,054,031 4,000,000 2008 152,030,000 30,885,695 114,480,000 9,102,549 25,510,000 2009 231,525,000 28,745,695 110,095,000 10,766,432 7,510,000 2010 232,020,000 37,255,695 105,460,000 11,395,885 5,295,000 2011 219,025,000 34,690,401 100,165,000 9,939,798 4,300,000 2012 251,195,000 32,821,649 94,485,000 7,338,742 10,665,000 2013 359,454,849 11,817,334 89,258,322 5,826,454 9,055,000 2014 336,640,896 11,018,552 76,610,083 6,319,117 24,405,000 2015 395,180,000 9,032,571 65,105,000 5,801,241 25,505,000 Note: Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in Note 14 of the Notes to the Financial Statements. Beginning fiscal year 2013 debt is reported net of related premiums and discounts. See Table 17, the Schedule of Demographic and Economic Statistics for personal income and population data. 278 City of Corpus Christi Table 12 Business -Type Activities General Certificates Priority Junior Lien Total Percentage Obligation of Revenue Revenue Capital Utility Primary of Personal Per Bonds Obligation Bonds Bonds Leases Notes Government Income Capita - $ 44,025,000 $ 453,850,000 - $ 3,277,956 $ 171,604,070 $ 986,017,643 8.80% 3,337 48,189,305 506,795,000 3,699,994 168,900,717 1,059,169,742 8.96% 3,583 47,524,305 479,220,000 4,591,194 166,018,108 1,029,361,851 7.91% 3,461 58,484,305 546,875,000 5,006,444 164,625,035 1,163,632,911 7.99% 3,912 57,184,305 525,780,000 6,288,391 160,481,095 1,141,160,371 7.89% 3,739 61,149,599 572,095,000 8,318,853 156,204,665 1,165,888,316 7.42% 3,789 18,220,000 59,388,351 576,810,000 6,860,263 152,512,889 1,210,296,894 7.70% 3,878 68,204,912 19,889,739 453,480,430 246,054,017 8,158,202 148,593,654 1,419,792,913 8.59% 4,434 66,185,000 17,017,275 416,345,000 306,290,000 9,278,830 144,435,976 1,414,545,729 7.93% 4,346 64,215,000 12,512,429 336,420,000 587,835,000 10,250,013 139,028,374 1,650,884,628 11.67% 5,288 279 City of Corpus Christi Table 13 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS RATIOS OF GENERAL BONDED DEBT OUTSTANDING LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Less Fiscal Amounts Percentage of Year General Available in Actual Ended Obligation Certificates Debt Service TaxableValue Per July 31 Bonds of Obligation Funds Total of Property Capita (1) 2006 149,085,000 32,480,000 10,255,911 171,309,089 1.3859% 579.77 2007 166,575,000 32,925,695 11,622,271 187,878,424 1.4006% 635.60 2008 152,030,000 30,885,695 16,591,514 166,324,181 1.0709% 559.17 2009 231,525,000 28,745,695 10,134,301 250,136,394 1.5421% 840.94 2010 232,020,000 37,255,695 11,923,519 257,352,176 1.5029% 843.18 2011 219,025,000 34,690,401 14,436,907 239,278,494 1.3782% 777.56 2012 269,415,000 92,210,000 16,858,822 344,766,178 1.9264% 1,104.79 2013 427,659,761 31,707,073 15,512,834 443,854,000 2.3115% 1,386.04 2014 402,825,896 28,035,827 8,660,390 422,201,333 2.0367% 1,297.18 2015 459,395,000 21,545,000 10,777,534 470,162,466 2.0992% 1,505.99 Note: Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to the financial statement. Beginning, fiscal year 2013 debt is reported net of related premiums and discounts. (1) See Table 17 - Schedule of Demographic and Economic Statistics for personal income and population data. 280 City of Corpus Christi CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES DEBT AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 City City of Corpus Christi, Texas - direct County Nueces County (excluding special districts) School District Table 14 Estimated Estimated % of Debt Share of Net Direct Debt Applicable Overlapping Amount As of Debt $ 401,367,335 9/30/2015 100.00% $ 401,367,335 109,460,043 9/30/2015 72.40% 79,249,071 Calallen Independent School District 43,971,800 9/30/2015 67.95% 29,878,838 Corpus Christi Independent School District 387,101,783 9/30/2015 86.25% 333,875,288 Flour Bluff Independent School District 48,595,213 9/30/2015 99.29% 48,250,187 London Independent School District 18,126,894 9/30/2015 59.34% 10,756,499 Port Aransas Independent School District 7,646,505 9/30/2015 14.22% 1,087,333 Robstown Independent School District 53,957,149 9/30/2015 0.01% 5,396 Tuloso-Midway Independent School District 70,667,216 9/30/2015 42.01% 29,687,297 West Oso Independent School District 28,671,168 9/30/2015 92.90% 26,635,515 Other Corpus Christi Junior College District Nueces County Hospital District Total overlapping debt Total direct and overlapping debt NOTE A: NOTE B: 66,866,574 9/30/2015 82.01% 54,837,277 9/30/2015 0.00% 835,064,345 614,262,701 $ 1,236,431,680 $ 1,015,630,036 Total direct debt shown for the City of Corpus Christi is net of premiums and discounts, and excludes self- supporting debt and a prorated share available for repayment in Debt Service Fund of $8,514,252. It is estimated that $112,234,773 is self supporting debt. To continue to maintain this debt as self-supporting, transfers will be made from Airport, Marina, Hotel Occupancy Tax Fund, Texas State Aquarium, Utility System and Solid Waste in amounts sufficient to pay both principal and interest on the self-supporting debt. Overlapping governments are those that coincide, at least in part, with the geographic boundaries of the City. The percentage of overlapping debt applicable is estimated by the percent of overlapping assessed value of each government that is within the boundaries of the City. 281 City of Corpus Christi CITY OF CORPUS CIIRISTI, TEXAS LEGAL DEBT MARGIN INFORMATION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Fiscal Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 Debt limit $ 1,235,133,813 $ 1,341,374,214 $ 1,553,126,690 $ 1,622,011,635 Total net debt applicable to limit 219,694,089 240,067,729 239,358,486 316,130,699 Legal debt margin $ 1,007,939,724 $ 1,101,306,485 $ 1,313,768,204 $ 1,305,880,936 Total net debt applicable to the limit as a percentage of debt limit 17.79% 17.90% 15.41% 19.49% (1) Assessed value is based on the appraised value of property prior to any deductions for exemptions. The assessed value is derived from the certified valuations provided by the Nueces County Tax Appraisal District as of July 25, 2014. Note: Beginning with fiscal year 2013, debt is reported net of related premiums and discounts. City of Corpus Christi Fiscal Year Table 15 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 $ 1,712,352,047 $ 1,736,227,525 $ 1,789,689,744 $ 1,920,227,729 $ 2,072,955,370 $ 2,239,723,568 319,831,481 304,728,093 355,431,178 452,909,000 446,149,479 495,667,466 $ 1,392,520,566 $ 1,431,499,432 $ 1,434,258,566 $ 1,467,318,729 $ 1,626,805,891 $ 1,744,056,102 18.68% 17.55% 19.86% 23.59% LEGAL DEBT MARGIN CALCULATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 Assessed value 21.52% 22.13% (1) $ 22,397,235,680 Debt limit (10% of total assessed value) Debt applicable to limit- Gross imitGross Bonded Debt Less: Net assets in Debt Service Fund Total net debt applicable to limit Legal debt margin 283 2,239,723,568 506,445,000 10,777,534 495,667,466 $ 1,744,056,102 City of Corpus Christi CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS PLEDGED - REVENUE COVERAGE LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Utility System Revenue Bonds Adjusted Net Revenue Priority Revenue Bonds Operating Available Annual Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Gross Income for Debt Year Revenue Deductions Service Principal Interest Coverage 2006 169,845,386 124,064,017 45,781,369 17,890,000 15,459,432 1.37 2007 167,638,283 120,023,039 47,615,244 21,030,000 18,213,273 1.21 2008 174,023,636 121,130,851 52,892,785 22,715,000 18,133,573 1.29 2009 188,422,621 122,025,805 66,396,816 23,750,000 18,890,476 1.56 2010 185,342,336 123,436,112 61,906,224 24,760,000 20,872,184 1.36 2011 203,523,352 131,598,133 71,925,219 24,135,000 22,448,605 1.54 2012 206,350,597 120,818,926 85,531,671 25,070,000 21,668,130 1.83 2013 206,635,317 122,958,943 83,676,374 21,120,000 18,161,601 2.13 2014* 257,300,329 157,723,014 99,577,315 22,755,000 16,547,375 2.53 2015 222,130,769 133,070,062 89,060,707 19,665,000 16,850,245 2.44 * The City changed its fiscal year from July 31 to September 30 FY 2014 includes 14 months of operations 284 City of Corpus Christi Table 16 Net Revenue Available for Junior Lien Debt Service Junior Lien Bonds Annual Debt Service Requirements Principal Interest Coverage $ 44,394,773 $ 8,010,000 $ 6,744,667 3.01 60,274,940 8,375,000 13,332,367 2.78 52,545,462 10,015,000 14,502,219 2.14 285 City of Corpus Christi Fiscal Year Population (1) Table 17 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC STATISTICS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Education Level in Per Capita Years of School Personal Personal Median Formal Enrollment Unemployment Income (2) Income (2) Age (1) Schooling (3) Rate (4) Rate (5) 2006 295,478 11,199,871,000 33,904 2007 295,594 11,816,184,000 35,750 2008 297,447 13,006,066,000 37,700 2009 297,447 14,556,590,000 35,004 2010 305,215 (6) 14,457,000,000 34,743 2011 307,728 15,719,000,000 39,635 2012 312,065 16,524,276,000 38,609 2013 320,231 17,832,307,000 40,796 2014 325,477 14,151,427,000 44,765 2015 320,434 14,683,147,000 46,049 Source: (1) City of Corpus Christi staff (2) Bureau of Economic Analysis (3) U. S. Census Bureau for population 25 years or older, some years not available (4) Corpus Christi Independent School District - budgeted daily enrollment (5) Texas Workforce Commission, city civilian labor force (6) U. S. Census Bureau - 2010 Census 286 34.7 34.6 34.6 34.6 34.3 34.8 34.6 34.3 34.4 34.6 36,158 38,796 38,754 38,460 38,196 38,357 39,106 39,400 39,414 38,614 5.7 4.7 4.8 7.3 7.7 8.0 6.6 5.8 4.9 4.2 City of Corpus Christi Employer CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS PRINCIPAL EMPLOYERS SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 AND JULY 31, 2006 2015 2006 Number of Employees Rank Table 18 Percent of Total City Number of Employment ** Employees Rank Percent of Total City Employment Corpus Christi Army Depot 5,800 1 3.32% 5,500 1 4.04% Corpus Christi Independent School District 5,178 2 2.97% 5,404 2 3.97% Christus Spohn Health System 5,144 3 2.95% 4,500 3 3.30% H.E.B. Grocery Company 5,000 4 2.86% 2,882 4 2.12% City of Corpus Christi 3,171 5 1.82% 2,654 5 1.95% Naval Air Station Corpus Christi 2,822 6 1.62% 2,500 6 1.83% Bay Ltd. 2,100 7 1.20% 2,200 7 1.61% Driscoll Children's Hospital 1,800 8 1.03% 2,007 8 1A7% Del Mar College 1,542 9 0.88% 1,680 9 1.23% Kiewit Offshore Services 900 10 0.52% 1,200 10 0.88% Total 32,557 18.65% 30,527 22.40% Source: Corpus Christi Regional Economic and Development Corporation (CCREDC) (2011 available data) ** Percent of Total City Employment for Total Nonfarm employment amounts as reported by CCREDC 287 City of Corpus Christi CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT CITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES BY FUNCTION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Fiscal Year Function 2006 2007 2008 General Fund Mayor 2.00 2.00 2.00 ACM - administrative services 1.00 1.00 1.00 ACM - Sadety, Health & Neighborhood 2.00 2.00 2.00 Deputy City Manager City attorney 26.00 26.00 26.00 City manager 3.00 3.00 3.00 City secretary 7.00 7.00 7.00 Communications and quality management Community development -- -- -- Neighborhood services 18.80 20.80 24.80 Economic development office 1.00 1.00 2.00 Education advisor -- -- 1.50 Engineering - special services 8.00 9.00 9.00 Engineering Inspections Code Enforcement Financial services 56.00 57.00 57.00 Fire 424.00 412.00 414.00 Health 69.50 70.50 71.50 Animal Care Human relations 6.00 6.00 6.00 Human resources 20.75 20.75 22.00 Internal audit 2.00 Intergovernmental relations __ __ __ Libraries 67.50 67.50 74.00 Office of Management and Budget 8.00 9.00 9.00 Materials management -- -- -- Municipal court - administration 35.00 37.00 46.00 Municipal court - judicial 43.30 42.96 35.94 Museum 22.50 22.80 22.80 Office of Intergovernmental Relations & Community Development __ __ __ Parks and recreation 305.97 317.23 300.07 Planning __ __ Police 601.50 601.50 619.00 Public information 3.00 3.00 3.00 Street and solid waste services 292.00 303.00 305.00 Total 2,023.82 2,042.04 2,065.61 (Continued) 288 City of Corpus Christi Table 19 Fiscal Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 26.00 26.00 25.00 23.00 21.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 26.80 27.00 19.90 19.90 21.90 2.00 2.00 1.00 -- -- -- -- 19.00 15.00 18.00 23.00 7.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 21.00 27.00 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.00 20.70 1.00 21.0 53.00 50.00 46.00 51.00 51.00 51.00 51.00 432.00 432.00 429.00 429.00 428.00 429.00 429.00 71.50 68.00 66.00 61.00 33.00 34.00 34.50 29.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.75 20.00 20.00 17.00 16.00 17.00 17.00 18.00 1.00 3.0 4.00 4.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 73.00 70.50 62.60 52.35 52.35 52.35 53.35 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 9.00 9.00 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 48.00 45.00 42.00 59.00 57.00 62.00 63.00 34.08 30.08 30.90 8.72 8.90 8.90 7.90 22.70 21.70 21.70 17.40 18.40 299.32 279.64 263.23 256.71 249.52 252.00 262.57 621.00 625.50 635.50 633.90 601.20 605.70 588.36 5.00 4.00 4.00 2.50 2.50 2.60 5.20 298.00 290.00 286.00 236.00 150.00 150.00 154.00 2,083.40 2,036.42 1,994.83 1,920.48 1,750.77 1,740.25 1,782.13 City of Corpus Christi CITY OF CORPUS CFIRISTI, TEXAS FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT CITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES BY FUNCTION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Fiscal Year Function 2006 2007 2008 Enterprise Funds Aviation 93.75 98.95 95.20 Ambulance -- -- -- Golf Centers 22.00 29.50 29.50 Marina 16.50 14.00 14.00 Gas 148.80 147.80 134.80 Storm Water -- -- 77.00 Wastewater 177.00 173.00 162.00 Water 255.00 255.00 157.00 ACM - Public Works 2.00 2.00 2.00 Utility Business Office 19.00 18.00 19.00 Utility Field Services 44.00 45.00 40.00 Office of Environmental Programs 3.00 3.00 2.00 Total 781.05 786.25 732.50 Internal Service Funds Engineering 57.10 57.10 57.00 Liability and employee benefits fund 14.00 15.00 15.00 Maintenance service 99.00 100.00 100.00 Facilities Maintenance Service Municipal information system 93.00 100.00 109.00 Stores 8.00 9.00 9.00 Total 271.10 281.10 290.00 Special Revenue Funds Street Services Municipal Court - Case Manager Fund Development Services 57.00 58.00 63.00 Visitor's facilities fund 1.00 1.00 11.00 Redlight Photo Enforcement -- -- -- Crime Control 65.60 64.60 65.60 Local Emergency Planning Committee 1.00 1.00 1.00 Total 124.60 124.60 140.60 Total operating budget FTEs 3,200.57 3,233.99 3,228.71 Source: City of Corpus Christi Office of Management and Budget 290 City of Corpus Christi Table 19 (Continued) Fiscal Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 96.95 97.20 97.20 91.40 91.40 82.00 82.00 29.50 29.50 29.50 -- -- -- -- 14.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 134.80 135.80 137.00 135.00 135.00 152.00 153.00 75.00 75.00 87.00 87.00 87.00 87.00 85.00 162.00 167.00 167.00 168.00 168.00 168.00 160.00 163.00 166.00 167.00 161.00 165.40 193.40 200.40 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 21.00 40.00 31.00 31.00 30.00 30.00 -- 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 -- 8.00 741.25 742.50 756.70 714.40 718.80 719.40 726.40 61.63 64.00 61.00 58.00 57.00 59.00 75.00 15.00 15.00 16.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 19.00 87.00 87.00 85.00 77.00 77.00 79.00 59.00 23.00 105.00 105.00 98.00 94.00 93.00 93.00 96.00 20.00 21.00 21.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 288.63 292.00 281.00 269.00 267.00 271.00 292.00 132.00 3.00 76.00 63.00 60.00 60.00 59.00 62.00 63.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 11.00 11.00 13.00 -- 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 65.60 65.60 65.60 64.60 63.60 66.60 79.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 152.60 141.60 138.60 137.60 136.60 142.60 293.60 3,265.88 3,212.52 3,171.13 3,041.48 -- 2,873.17 2,873.25 3,094.13 City of Corpus Christi CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS OPERATING INDICATORS BY FUNCTION LAST TEN YEARS Function Fiscal Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 Police Physical arrests 4,792 11,282 14,440 17,786 Parking violations 18,287 * 17,571 * 23,973 * 23,976 * Traffic violations 57,478 58,885 53,355 51,778 Number of commissioned police officers 448 448 448 451 Number of employees - police officers and civilians 671 672 672 711 Officers per 1000 population 1.52 1.52 1.51 1.52 School crossing guards 87 87 91 91 Fire Number of calls answered 30,700 33,000 37,492 39,115 Inspections 3,000 4,765 4,641 5,342 Number of firefighters 383 402 394 403 Number of employees - firefighters and civilians 400 419 419 423 Employees per 1,000 population 1.30 1.36 1.32 1.35 State Fire Insurance Credit Rating Class 4 Class 3 Class 3 Class 2 Streets Street resurfacing (miles) - 722,367 sq yds 367,266 sq yds 267,817 sq yds Potholes repaired 75,000 83,177 97,634 Parks and recreation Number of registered youth participants in Latchkey afterschool program n/a n/a n/a 2,478 Number of meals served at Senior Centers 126,773 117,333 103,431 104,155 Libraries Number of volumes 394,666 389,634 405,225 431,098 Circulation 1,191,605 1,211,792 1,241,042 1,339,242 Library cards in force 150,552 143,699 150,712 150,712 Computer usage, sessions 1,044,617 1,160,698 - - Number of website hits -- -- -- 25,084,906 Number of in-house personal computer users -- -- 203,480 240,525 Solid Waste Refuse collected (tons/day) 389 395 386 378 Recyclables collected (tons/day) 13 13 13 12.3 Water New connections (UBO) 1,358 1,690 474 265 Water main breaks 2,617 2,313 2,022 1,706 Average daily consumption (thousands of gallons) 97,686 97,686 94,541 102,025 Average daily gallons treated & raw water sold 106,251,600 136,281,605 94,541,688 102,025,373 Average water treated (thousand of gallons) n/a n/a 65,860 68,888 Average daily consumption per capita (gallons) 121 134 119 128 Residential per capita consumption gallons/day n/a n/a 77 81 Gas Average daily consumption (mct) 8,438 2,842 8,498 8,626 Wastewater Average daily sewage treatment (thousands of gallons) 27,478 30,605 28,808 26,867 Airport Number of airports 1 1 1 1 Number of acres 2,574 2,574 2,657 2,657 Sources: Various city departments Note: The City has only been compiling this data with implementation of GASB 44 in fiscal year 2002. * Data presented is for the calendar year rather than the fiscal year. ** FY2014 includes 14 months of operations 292 City of Corpus Christi Table 20 Fiscal Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 ** 2015 17,036 17,928 17,895 17,366 22,159 16,957 18,705 * 7,925 * 7,705 9,694 20,241 12,538 51,082 41,216 39,145 48,226 60,880 10,983 451 451 451 451 449 439 711 711.1 685.8 685.8 672 684 1A8 1A7 1.50 1.40 1.40 L4 91 91 28 28 0 0 38,939 39,667 42,923 44,933 55,242 47,653 5,272 4,116 6,093 6,945 7,312 6,380 414 398 414 414 414 414 429 414 431 431 431 430 1.36 1.29 1.36 1.38 1.37 1.36 Class 2 Class 2 Class 2 Class 2 Class 2 Class 2 549,631 sq yds 693,586 sq yds 600,387 sq yds 408,439 sq yds 435,847 sq. yds. 213,805 158,827 126,696 109,070 166,405 2,396 2,497 2,375 2,240 2,515 95,954 106,995 93,516 91,486 90,276 760,413 sq. yds. 259,663 2,529 81,605 484,442 661,332 412,386 358,544 386,633 357,454 1,344,845 1,247,799 709 800,285 925,998 788,888 153,222 201,863 217,247 228,041 179,831 25,963 -- -- -- - - 222,350 10,041,335 5,114,607 9,723,058 12,500,511 8,039,479 4,983,149 282,360 255,923 184,137 221,891 273,763 222,350 382 378 376 350 368 407 11.7 31.7 5 53 55 55 236 236 217 1,282 1,465 1,439 1,507 1,584 1,966 1,409 2,025 1,295 94,637 99,271 104,316 100,563 97,689 91,500 94,637,901 99,271,184 104,316,132 100,562,948 97,689,000 91,500,000 63,197 67,592 69,919 68,029 65,821 64,527 118 125 122 107 103 92 76 80 78 70 67 60 8,466 9,050 8,033 8,535 11,733 10,611 29,691 28,152 25,776 25,648 30,722 30,041 1 1 1 1 1 1 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 City of Corpus Christi CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS CAPITAL ASSET STATISTICS BY FUNCTION LAST TEN YEARS Fiscal Year Function 2006 2007 2008 General government Buildings: (City owned) Total square footage, approximate 2,864,000 2,864,000 2,883,975 Police Stations 4 4 4 Patrol units 295 295 295 Area of responsibility - land area (square miles) 150.48 150.48 150.48 Fire Fire stations 16 16 16 Fire apparatus 30 30 30 Other motorized vehicles 77 77 77 Number of fire hydrants 8,400 8,400 8,479 Streets Streets (miles) 1,103 1,119 1,123 Streetlights 16,308 16,662 16,767 Traffic signals n/a n/a n/a Libraries Number of libraries 5 5 5 Parks and recreation Parks acreage 1,418 1,415 1,418 Parks 189 190 190 Swimming pools 9 9 9 Tennis courts 37 37 37 Community centers 5 5 5 Park acreage partially developed 171 171 168 Playgrounds 128 129 131 Municipal beaches 4 4 4 Baseball diamonds 1 1 4 Softball diamonds 5 5 5 Senior centers 8 8 8 Gymnasiums 2 2 2 Covered basketball courts 3 3 3 Water Water mains (miles) 1,533 1,553 1,584 Fire hydrants 8,400 8,400 8,479 Maximum daily capacity 104,880 97,750 97,850 (thousands of gallons) Water connections - active 83,785 85,959 84,442 Storm water drainage ditches (miles) 607 607 610 Storm water underground pipe (miles) 597 597 606 294 City of Corpus Christi Table 21 Fiscal Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2,883,975 2,883,975 2,883,975 3,740,189 3,474,290 2,453,733 2,270, 914 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 354 244 244 244 244 244 244 150.48 150.48 150.48 150.48 150.48 150.48 150.48 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 77 77 88 88 88 90 84 8,800 8,890 9,007 10,451 10,451 10,879 10,730 1,139 1,172 1,178 1,181 1,183 1201 1,221 16,874 17,053 17,166 17,315 17,191 17,264 16,115 n/a n/a n/a 242 243 245 246 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 1,418 1,420 1,420 1,690 1,690 1,690 1,690 191 194 196 196 196 196 196 9 9 9 9 6 6 6 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 384 386 389 389 389 389 389 139 143 140 140 140 140 133 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 2 2 2 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 1,624 1,629 1,636 1,654 1,677 1,687 1,693 8,800 8,890 9,007 10,451 10,451 10,879 10,718 96,220 95,450 92,670 103,500 93.42 87,800 161,000 87,042 90,957 90,928 93,927 93,123 104,065 97,970 602 552 501 501 501 580 666 632 675 630 630 630 600 634 295 City of Corpus Christi CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS CAPITAL ASSET STATISTICS BY FUNCTION LAST TEN YEARS Fiscal Year Function 2006 2007 2008 Gas Gas mains (miles) 1,291 1,327 1,337 Gas connections - active 53,989 54,436 53,688 Wastewater Sanitary sewers (miles) 1,243 1,258 1,265 Maximum daily treatment capacity 44,700 44,700 44,700 (thousands of gallons) Sewer connections 80,725 82,957 81,823 Lift stations 96 95 97 Airport Length of main runways 13,588 13,588 13,588 Scheduled airline arrivals and departures per year 19,689 19,710 16,306 Passengers enplaning and deplaning 890,800 886,528 861,641 (including commercial helicopters) Golf centers Municipal golf courses 2 2 2 Municipal golf links - acres 378 376 376 Marina Marina slips 456 590 590 Note: The City has only been compiling this data with implementation of GASB 44 in fiscal year 2002. 296 City of Corpus Christi Table 21 (Continued) Fiscal Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1,349 1,354 1,399 1,402 1,405 1,417 1,423 54,162 55,467 60,430 62,260 62,667 54,413 54,413 1,269 1,271 1,282 1,286 1,293 1,300 1,288 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 42,700 42,700 82,948 83,174 83,250 84,338 85,602 84,681 86,467 97 99 99 100 100 100 100 13,588 13,588 13,588 13,588 13,588 13,588 13,590 17,056 16,560 17,130 17,130 17,053 21,476 16,809 750,080 706,133 688,051 672,130 644,570 807,754 693,756 2 2 2 2 2 2 376 376 376 376 376 376 2 376 590 626 626 578 513 471 586 297 City of Corpus Christi MISCELLANEOUS STATISTICAL DATA FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 GOVERNMENT: (1) Date of incorporation 1852 Charter: Revised July 13, 1968 Revised September 15, 1970 Revised January 22, 1975 Revised April 5, 1980 Revised August 11, 1984 Revised April 4, 1987 Revised January 19, 1991 Revised April 3, 1993 Revised November 2, 2004 Revised November 2, 2010 Form of government: Fiscal year begins October 1st Number of City employees 2,943 GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION: Southeastern Coast of Texas on the Gulf of Mexico approximately 150 miles north of the Mexican border. Total primary government net position Land 146.7 Water 352.0 498.7 POPULATION: Year Trade Area Population ELEVATION: Sea level to 85 feet TEMPERATURE: (3) 80.3° F maximum average 63.4° F minimum average 71.8° F mean average SEASONAL RAINFALL 47.98 inches for fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 Source: 1950 1960 1970 1980 2000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 (Census) (Census) 293,661 382,423 359,523 400,500 474,157 485,885 415,376 428,185 426,073 433,583 437,109 448,108 449,323 (1) City Staff (2) Port of Corpus Chr http://www.portofcc.com/index.php/general-information-155/statistics/yearly-statistics (3) National Weather Service www.ncdc.noaa.gov 298 108,053 167,690 204,525 232,134 277,454 297,447 297,447 305,215 313,422 312,065 320,231 325,477 312,195 City of Corpus Christi PORT OF CORPUS CHRISTI: (2) Tonnage handled through the Port during the year 2015 Number of ships handled during the year 2015 Number of barges handled during the year 2015 Source: Public Docks: Bulk liquid 13 Dry cargo 7 Bulk materials 2 Total 22 Private Docks: Bulk Liquid - Citgo 7 - Main Harbor Equistar 1 - Main Harbor Flint Hills 3 - Main Harbor Flint Hills 1 - Ingleside Valero 6 - Main Harbor Occidental Chemical 6 - La Quinta Koch Gathering 1 - Ingleside Trafigura 5 Main Harbor Nu Star 1 Main Harbor Dry Cargo - Bay, Inc. 1 - Main Harbor Heldenfels 1 - Main Harbor Texas Leheigh Cement 1 - Main Harbor Fordyce 1 - Main Harbor Tor Minerals International, Inc. 1 - Rincon McDermott 1 - Harbor Island Gulf Marine Fabricators 2 - Ingleside Kiewit Offshore Services, Inc. 1 - La Quinta Helix Energy Solutions 1 - La Quinta Occidental Chemical (NSI) 3 - La Quinta Voestalpine 1 - La Quinta Signet Maritime 1 - Jewell Fulton Dry Cargo - ADM/Growmark 1 - Main Harbor Interstate Grain 1 - Main Harbor Sherwin Alumina 1 - La Quinta Vulcan Materials 1 - Main Harbor Total 72 (1) City Staff (2) Port of Corpus Christi (3) National Weather Service www.nws.noaa.gov 299 Table 22 103,478,088 1,772 5,787 City of Corpus Christi Table 23 CITY PAYROLL STATISTICS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Texas Number Social Municipal Fire Fighters' Employees Fiscal Security Retirement Retirement Total Last Payday Year Salaries & Medicare System System Plan Paid of Year 2006 $ 124,601,361 $ 5,903,267 $ 13,853,273 $ 2,795,774 $ 147,153,675 3,183 2007 127,318,989 7,603,602 14,372,192 3,040,260 152,335,043 3,217 2008 133,145,260 7,991,390 15,603,377 3,575,262 160,315,289 3,309 2009 140,069,626 8,350,623 16,549,804 3,997,364 168,967,417 3,406 2010 142,607,262 7,714,798 18,330,551 4,440,572 173,093,184 3,236 2011 147,878,682 8,485,205 16,832,574 5,158,128 178,354,589 3,091 2012 137,951,126 7,969,329 15,541,644 5,254,970 166,717,069 2,972 2013 142,076,954 8,240,414 16,101,720 5,640,851 172,059,939 2,959 2014 * 170,695,596 9,994,840 20,838,560 7,009,621 208,538,617 2,900 2015 148,105,511 8,680,222 18,964,205 6,266,444 182,016,382 2,943 Note: The data in this Table is abstracted from payroll reports. * Includes 14 months of operations 300 City of Corpus Christi Fiscal Year Table 24 RETIREMENT SYSTEM PENSION DATA LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS TEXAS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM PENSION DATA Pension Plan Pension Net Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Benefits Investment Liability (4) Receipts (3) Position (2) Paid Income 2006 $ 114,519,596 $ 32,767,434 $ 235,856,593 $ 35,322,082 $ 13,915,946 2007 123,761,526 33,620,204 236,329,255 33,147,542 13,206,208 2008 198,547,208 32,602,880 234,960,197 33,971,939 11,536,275 2009 207,164,256 33,740,446 234,890,896 33,809,747 11,440,094 2010 218,806,609 39,295,663 246,315,526 27,871,033 14,696,659 2011 (1) 46,392,672 40,573,796 511,209,314 33,759,205 10,053,791 2012 (1) 43,677,917 34,740,040 533,122,252 36,541,040 12,826,388 2013 (1) 41,424,714 76,187,208 558,527,434 36,700,614 53,720,245 2014 (1) 68,173,179 79,511,648 583,192,963 41,515,481 56,229,015 2015 (1) 179,740,443 60,211,798 637,287,989 43,536,263 35,519,832 Note: Information is as of December 31 of the previous year which is the latest information available. (1) Reflects information for the Benefit Accumulation Fund, which was created at the end of calendar year 2011 by combining the Municipal Accumulation Fund, Employee Savings Fund, and Current Service Annuity Reserve Fund. Previously, only the Municipal Accumulation Fund and Employee Savings Funds were presented. (2) Beginning with FY2015, reflects Fiduciary Net Position. Previously reflected Actuarial Value of Pension Plan Assets. (3) Includes Employer and Employee contributions and investment income. (4) Beginning with FY2015, reflects Net Pension Liability. Previously reflected Unfunded Pension Plan Liability. Fiscal Year FIRE FIGHTERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM PENSION DATA Pension Plan Pension Net Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Benefits Investment Liability (4) Receipts (3) Position (2) Paid Income 2006 $ 7,409,892 $ 89,401,693 $ 7,399,360 $ 2,460,607 2007 42,220,967 8,337,516 92,448,683 8,326,653 3,379,800 2008 (1) 12,070,194 101,440,018 8,789,387 6,346,915 2009 70,349,504 10,485,810 76,979,921 9,370,772 3,843,537 2010 (1) 10,119,821 92,547,683 8,968,492 2,510,550 2011 73,485,485 10,677,167 101,080,549 9,174,655 2,602,919 2012 (1) 11,524,824 98,507,970 11,039,071 3,112,342 2013 86,516,036 11,942,630 108,858,951 11,692,501 3,231,103 2014 (1) 13,575,367 126,159,233 10,966,158 3,829,115 2015 $ 74,975,185 16,483,282 130,814,419 11,612,717 6,949,478 Note: The Fire Fighters' Retirement System is not subject to any control by the City Council as the governing body of the City of Corpus Christi. Information is as of December 31 of the previous year which is the latest information available. (1) (2) (3) (4) No actuarial valuation performed for previous calendar year. Beginning with FY2015, reflects Fiduciary Net Position. Previously reflected Pension Plan Assets. Includes Employer and Employee contributions and investment income. Beginning with FY2015, reflects Net Pension Liability. Previously reflected Unfunded Pension Plan Liability. 301 City of Corpus Christi Type of Insurance ALL FUNDS INSURANCE AND SURETY BONDS IN FORCE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Insurer and Expiration Date Amount of Coverage Table 25 1. Property Insurances Commercial Property & Wind Policy Scheduled City Properties Property & Wind Coverage Commercial City Properties Excess Property & Wind Coverage Commercial City Properties Excess Property & Wind Coverage Commercial City Properties Excess Property & Wind Coverage Commercial City Properties Excess Property & Wind Coverage Commercial City Properties Excess Property & Wind Coverage Commercial City Properties Excess Property & Wind Coverage Commercial City Properties Excess Property & Wind Coverage Commercial City Properties Excess Property & Wind Coverage Commercial City Properties Multiple layers (Itemized Below) Expires 5-4-2016 AXIS Expires 5-4-2016 LEXINGTON Expires 5-4-2016 ARCH Expires 5-4-2016 RSUI INDEMNITY CO. Expires 5-4-2016 ASPEN Expires 5-4-2016 $250Million all other perils,$150 Million wind coverage, $25 Million Flood Building & Personal Property Blanket Coverage 2%, Named Storm, $250,000 Minimum / $4 Million Maximum Deductible $250,000 all other Wind/Hail Deductible $50,000 Deductible All Other Perils $100,000 Flood; Earthquake Deductible (Replacement cost coverage) Named Storm only - 2.5 Million - Named Storm Primary Limit Building & Personal Property Blanket Coverage $25,000,000 Excess of $2.5 Million Primary Named Storm Limit Building & Personal Property Blanket Coverage $3,825,000 part of $22.5 Million exccess of $27.5 Million -Named Storm Limit Building & Personal Property Blanket Coverage $6,300,000 part of $22.5 Million exccess of $27.5 Million - Named Storm Limit Building & Personal Property Blanket Coverage $2,475,000 part of $22.5 Million exccess of $27.5 Million - Named Storm Limit Building & Personal Property Blanket Coverage NORTH AMERICAN CAPACITY Ins. $4,950,000 part of $22.5 Million exccess of $27.5 Million - Named Storm Limit Expires 5-4-2016 Building & Personal Property Blanket Coverage ACE/WESTCHESTER Expires 5-4-2016 COLONY Expires 5-4-2016 ROCKHILL Expires 5-4-2016 $4,950,000 part of $22.5 Million exccess of $27.5 Million - Named Storm Limit Building & Personal Property Blanket Coverage $5,000,000 part of $50 Million Excess of $50Million - Named Storm Limit Building & Personal Property Blanket Coverage $10,000,000 part of $50 Million Excess of $50 Million - Named Storm Limit Building & Personal Property Blanket Coverage 302 City of Corpus Christi Type of Insurance ALL FUNDS INSURANCE AND SURETY BONDS IN FORCE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Insurer and Expiration Date Amount of Coverage Table 25 (Continued) Excess Property & Wind Coverage Commercial City Properties Excess Property & Wind Coverage Commercial City Properties Excess Property & Wind Coverage Commercial City Properties Excess Property & Wind Coverage Commercial City Properties Excess Property & Wind Coverage Commercial City Properties Property Coverage Commercial City Properties Boiler & Machinery Coverage Commercial City Properties 2. Flood Insurance Primary Flood Specified City Buildings 3. Airport Liability Primary Aviation Excess Aviation AXIS Expires 5-4-2016 ASPEN Expires 5-4-2016 ACE/WESTCHESTER Expires 5-4-2016 ARCH Expires 5-4-2016 LIBERTY Expires 5-4-2016 Lexington Expires 5-4-2016 Travelers Insurance Company Expires 5-4-2016 National Flood Program/ Selective Insurance Expires 11-4-2016 Texas Municipal League Expires 11-4-2015 ACE -Illinois Union Ins Co Expires 11-4-2015 $5,000,000 part of $50 Million Excess of $50 Million - Named Storm Limit Building & Personal Property Blanket Coverage $5,000,000 part of $50 Million Excess of $50 Million -Named Storm Limit Building & Personal Property Blanket Coverage $5,000,000 part of $50 Million Excess of $50 Million - Named Storm Limit Building & Personal Property Blanket Coverage $10,000,000 part of $50 Million excess of $50 Million - Named Storm Limit Building & Personal Property Blanket Coverage $10,000,000 part of $50 Million excess of $100 Million - Named Storm Limit Building & Personal Property Blanket Coverage $250 Million All other Perils excluding Named Storm Wind Building & Personal Property Blanket Coverage - $50,000 oer occurrence deductible $100 Million Property Damage $2,500 Property Damage per occurrence Deductible Building &/or contents values up to maximum of $500,000 per building &/or $500,000 per contents per location $2000 deductible per building/ per contents (specified locations) $25,000,000 Limit of Liability $5,000 per occurrence deductible and $10,000 annual aggregate deductible $50,000,000 Liability Limit in Excess of $25,000,000 ($75,000,000 max.) 303 City of Corpus Christi Type of Insurance ALL FUNDS INSURANCE AND SURETY BONDS IN FORCE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Insurer and Expiration Date Amount of Coverage Table 25 (Continued) 4. Employee Dishonesty / Crime Coverage Texas Municipal League Expires 11-4-2015 5. Excess General Liability, Public Officials, Colony Employment & Law Enforcement Liability 6. Excess Workers' Compensation 6. Gas Utility Liability 7. General Liability CCPD -- Flint Hills Lease GL 8. Special Events Policy July 4th Celebration 9. Automobile Coverage TB Clinic Van Fleet Catastrophic Automobile Physical Damage CCPD Leased Vehicles Solid Waste Transfer Trailers Specified Higher Valued Vehicles Specified Mobile Equipment 10. Animal Mortality and Theft CCPD Canine Expires 10-1-2015 Colony Expires 10-1-2015 Texas Municipal League Expires 11-4-2015 Texas Municipal League Expires 11-4-2015 Northfield Ins. Co. Expires 7-6-2015 Texas Municipal League Expires 11-4-2015 Texas Municipal League Expires 11-4-2015 Texas Municipal League Expires 11-4-2015 Texas Municipal Leaue Expires 11-4-2015 $1,000,000 per occ. for Public Employee Dishonesty Forgery or Alteration, Theft, Disappearance and Destruction Computer Fraud; with $10,000 Deductible; $5 Million each Accident or Occurrence Limit $10 Milliom Aggregate Limit $500,000 SIR Workers Compensation Statutory $650,000 SIR for Police, Fire, Gas Utility $500,000 SIR for All Others $10,000,000 per occurrence $250,000 Deductible $2,000,000 for Pollution per occurrence $250,000 Deductible $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000 deductible $2,000,000 General Aggregate $1,000,000 each Occurrence $1,000,000 Bodily Injury & Property Damage $25,000 -Medical Payments Actual Cash Value - physical damage $250 deductible $15,000,000 Blanket Limit per Occurrence $250,000 Deductible Actual Cash Value - physical damage $250 deductible $500 deductible $2500 deductible As Scheduled 304 Single Audit Section COLLIER, JOHNSON & WOODS, P.C. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 555 N. Carancahua Suite 1000 Corpus Christi, Texas 78401-0839 361-884-9347 • Fax 361-884-9422 www.cjw-cpa.com INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS March 31, 2016 The Honorable Mayor, City Council Members, and the City Manager of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the State of Texas, Single Audit Circular, the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as of and for the year ended September 30, 2015, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated March 31, 2016. Internal Control over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City's internal control over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the preceding paragraph and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies and therefore, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may exist that were not identified. However, as described in the accompanying schedule of fmdings and questioned costs, we identified certain deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be significant deficiencies. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. 305 A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. We consider the deficiencies described in items 2015-1 and 2015-2 in the accompanying federal and state schedules of findings and questioned costs to be significant deficiencies. Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's basic financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. We noted certain matters that we reported to management of the City of Corpus Christi in a separate letter dated March 31, 2016. Purpose of this Report The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City's internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose. ebeeLit),VLawso 306 COLLIER, JOHNSON & WOODS, P.C. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 555 N. Carancahua Suite 1000 Corpus Christi, Texas 78401-0839 361-884-9347 • Fax 361-884-9422 www.cjw-cpa.com INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE FOR EACH MAJOR FEDERAL PROGRAM AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE REQUIRED BY OMB CIRCULAR A-133 March 31, 2016 The Honorable Mayor, City Council Members, and the City Manager of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program We have audited the City of Corpus Christi, Texas' (the City's) compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on each of the City's major federal programs for the year ended September 30, 2015. The City's major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditor's results section of the accompanying federal schedule of findings and questioned costs. Management's Responsibility Management is responsible for compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts and grants applicable to its federal programs. Auditor's Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance for each of the City's major federal programs based on our audit of the types of compliance requirements referred to above. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non -Profit Organizations. Those standards and OMB Circular A-133 require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the City's compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion on compliance for each major federal program. However, our audit does not provide a legal determination on the City's compliance 307 Opinion on Each Major Federal Program In our opinion, the City of Corpus Christi, Texas complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major federal programs for the year ended September 30, 2015. Report on Internal Control Over Compliance Management of the City is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above. In planning and performing our audit of compliance, we considered the City's internal control over compliance with the types of requirements that could have a direct and material effect on each major federal program to determine the auditing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing an opinion on compliance for each major federal program and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control over compliance. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of OMB Circular A-133. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. 308 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS FEDERAL SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Summary of Audit Results 1. The independent auditor's report expresses an unmodified opinion on the basic financial statements of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. 2. Two significant deficiencies relating to the audit of the financial statements are reported in the "Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards". No material weaknesses are reported. 3. No instances of noncompliance material to the financial statements of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, which would be required to be reported in accordance with Government Auditing Standards, were disclosed during the audit. 4. No significant deficiencies or material weaknesses relating to the audit of the major federal award programs are reported in the "Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance Each Major Federal Program and on Internal Control over Compliance in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133". 5. The auditor's report on compliance for the major federal award programs for the City of Corpus Christi, Texas expresses an unmodified opinion on all major programs. 6. There are no audit findings that are required to be reported in accordance with Section 510(a) of OMB Circular A-133. 7. The programs tested as major programs included: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development: HOME Improvement Partnership Program (CFDA 14.239) U.S. Department of Transportation: Airport Improvement Programs (CFDA 20.106) Highway Planning and Construction (CFDA 20.205) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Immunization Grants (CFDA 93.268) Promoting Safe and Stable Families (CFDA 93.556) Corporation for National and Community Service Senior Companion Program (CFDA 94.016) 8. The dollar threshold for distinguishing Type A and Type B programs was $981,291. 9. The City of Corpus Christi, Texas did not qualify as a low-risk auditee. 309 Findings - Financial Statement Audit SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY 2015-1 Grant Fund Accounting Condition: The parks and recreation grant fund reflected unearned revenue liability of $406,362 comprised of program income not properly recognized in the current fiscal year. The police grant fund reflected an outstanding receivable of $257,979 comprised of a prior year accrual that required reversal in the current fiscal year. Criteria: Grants receivable from other governments should be recorded at the appropriate amounts and any resulting valuation adjustments should be appropriately recorded. Revenue should be recognized when it is earned. If assets are recognized in connection with a transaction before the earnings process is complete, those assets must be offset by a corresponding liability commonly referred to as unearned income. Cause and Effect: Program income related to parks and recreation programs had been recorded as unearned revenues rather than being recognized as revenue. Also, reimbursements for grant expenditures had been recorded as revenue when they should have offset an existing receivable. The financial statements were corrected for these amounts. Recommendation: Procedures should be established that assure all grant receivables are fairly stated and any resulting valuation adjustments are appropriately recorded. Grant unearned revenue should be the offset for only assets that are recognized in connection with transactions in which the earning process is not complete. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The City agrees with the finding but disagrees that it is a significant deficiency. The recommended procedures were implemented and effective October 1, 2015. SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY 2015-2 Grant Fund Accounting Condition: Federal Highway Planning and Construction grants totaling $844,510 and related expenditures were not identified as grants or accounted for in the federal/state grants fund. Criteria: The City maintains the federal/state grant funds to account for projects funded by grants. Cause: The grant department was not notified of this grant. Effect: The project expenditures were not initially reported as expenditures of federal funds requiring consideration under the Single Audit Act. Only through auditor inquiry and review of activity in a non -grant special revenue fund were the expenditures identified as funded by a federal grant. The grant was determined to be a major program requiring the application of compliance audit procedures. Recommendation: Procedures should be established requiring grant funded contracts to be forwarded to the grants department for tracking. 310 Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The City agrees with the finding but disagrees that it is a significant deficiency. The recommended procedures were implemented and effective October 1, 2015. Findings and Questioned Costs — Major Federal Award Programs Audit The audit disclosed no findings required to be reported. Prior Year Findings and Questioned Costs — Financial Statement Audit SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY 2014-1 Grant Fund Accounting Condition: Certain non -grant revenue and expenditure transactions have been recorded in the federal/state grant funds and were carried as unearned revenues or accounts receivable rather than being recognized in the appropriate fund. Recommendation: Review, and change where necessary, policies related to grant fund accounting. Establish requirements to assure that only grant related items are recorded in the federal/state grant funds and all non -grant revenues and expenditures are recorded in the proper fund. Current Status: The recommendation was adopted in June 2015. However, a significant deficiency with similar conditions was noted during the current audit. See finding 2015-1. 311 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 COLLIER, JOHNSON & WOODS, P.C. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 555 N. Carancahua Suite 1000 Corpus Christi, Texas 78401-0839 361-884-9347 • Fax 361-884-9422 www.cjw-cpa.com INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE FOR EACH MAJOR STATE PROGRAM AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE OF TEXAS SINGLE AUDIT CIRCULAR March 31, 2016 The Honorable Mayor, City Council Members, and the City Manager of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas Report on Compliance for Each Major State Program We have audited the City of Corpus Christi, Texas' (the City's) compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the State of Texas Single Audit Circular that could have a direct and material effect on each of the City's major state programs for the year ended September 30, 2015. The City's major state programs are identified in the summary of auditor's results section of the accompanying state schedule of findings and questioned costs. Management's Responsibility Management is responsible for compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts and grants applicable to its state programs. Auditor's Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance for each of the City's major state programs based on our audit of the types of compliance requirements referred to above. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and the State of Texas Single Audit Circular issued by the Governor's Office of Budget and Planning Those standards and the Circular require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major state program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the City's compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion on compliance for each major state program. However, our audit does not provide a legal determination on the City's compliance. Opinion on Each Major State Program In our opinion, the City of Corpus Christi, Texas complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major state programs for the year ended September 30, 2015. 313 Report on Internal Control over Compliance Management of the City is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above. In planning and performing our audit of compliance, we considered the City's internal control over compliance with the types of requirements that could have a direct and material effect on each major state program to determine the auditing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing an opinion on compliance for each major state program and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with the State of Texas Single Audit Circular, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control over compliance A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a state program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a state program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a state program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of the State of Texas Single Audit Circular. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. eitee.4), onizt. 314 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS STATE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Summary of Audit Results 1. The independent auditor's report expresses an unmodified opinion on the basic financial statements of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. 2. Two significant deficiencies relating to the audit of the financial statements are reported in the "Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards". No material weaknesses are reported. 3. No instances of noncompliance material to the financial statements of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, which would be required to be reported in accordance with Government Auditing Standards, were disclosed during the audit. 4. No significant deficiencies or material weaknesses relating to the audit of the major state award programs are reported in the "Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance on each Major State Program and on Internal Control over Compliance in Accordance with the State of Texas Single Audit Circular." 5. The auditor's report on compliance for the major State award programs for the City of Corpus Christi, Texas expresses an unmodified opinion on all major programs. 6. There are no audit findings that are required to be reported in accordance with Section 510(a) of State of Texas Single Audit Circular. 8. The programs tested as major programs included: Texas Attorney General's Office State Confiscated Property Texas Commission on Environmental Quality: Air Quality Planning Activities Texas Department of Family and Protective Services Promoting Safe and Stable Families Texas Department of Parks and Wildlife: Oso Conservation and Interpretive Park 8. The dollar threshold for distinguishing Type A and Type B programs was $300,000. 9. The City of Corpus Christi, Texas did not qualify as a low-risk auditee. 315 Findings - Financial Statement Audit SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY 2015-1 Grant Fund Accounting Condition: The parks and recreation grant fund reflected unearned revenue liability of $406,362 comprised of program income not properly recognized in the current fiscal year. The police grant fund reflected an outstanding receivable of $257,979 comprised of a prior year accrual that required reversal in the current fiscal year. Criteria: Grants receivable from other governments should be recorded at the appropriate amounts and any resulting valuation adjustments should be appropriately recorded. Revenue should be recognized when it is earned. If assets are recognized in connection with a transaction before the earnings process is complete, those assets must be offset by a corresponding liability commonly referred to as unearned income. Cause and Effect: Program income related to parks and recreation programs had been recorded as unearned revenues rather than being recognized as revenue. Also, reimbursements for grant expenditures had been recorded as revenue when they should have offset an existing receivable. The financial statements were corrected for these amounts. Recommendation: Procedures should be established that assure all grant receivables are fairly stated and any resulting valuation adjustments are appropriately recorded. Grant unearned revenue should be the offset for only assets that are recognized in connection with transactions in which the earning process is not complete. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The City agrees with the finding but disagrees that it is a significant deficiency. The recommended procedures were implemented and effective October 1, 2015. SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY 2015-2 Grant Fund Accounting Condition: Federal Highway Planning and Construction grants totaling $844,510 and related expenditures were not identified as grants or accounted for in the federal/state grants fund. Criteria: The City maintains the federal/state grant funds to account for projects funded by grants. Cause: The grant department was not notified of this grant. Effect: The project expenditures were not initially reported as expenditures of federal funds requiring consideration under the Single Audit Act. Only through auditor inquiry and review of activity in a non -grant special revenue fund were the expenditures identified as funded by a federal grant. The grant was determined to be a major program requiring the application of compliance audit procedures. Recommendation: Procedures should be put in place requiring grant funded contracts to be forwarded to the grants department for tracking. 316 Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The City agrees with the finding but disagrees that it is a significant deficiency. The recommended procedures were implemented and effective October 1, 2015. Findings and Questioned Costs - Major State Award Programs Audit The audit disclosed no findings required to be reported. Prior Year Findings and Questioned Costs — Financial Statement Audit SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY 2014-1 Grant Fund Accounting Condition: Certain non -grant revenue and expenditure transactions have been recorded in the federal/state grant funds and were carried as unearned revenues or accounts receivable rather than being recognized in the appropriate fund. Recommendation: Review, and change where necessary, policies related to grant fund accounting. Establish requirements to assure that only grant related items are recorded in the federal/state grant funds and all non -grant revenues and expenditures are recorded in the proper fund. Current Status: The recommendation was adopted in June 2015. However, a significant deficiency with similar conditions was noted during the current audit. See finding 2015-1. 317 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 City of Corpus Christi SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL/STATE EXPENDITURES OF AWARDS FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Federal Grantor/Pass-Through Grantor State Grantor/Program Title Federal Assistance: U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Texas Dept. of State Health Services Women, Infants & Children Women, Infants & Children Total CFDA Number 10.557 Total Passed Through Texas Dept. of State Health Services Passed through Texas Dept. of Agriculture Child and Adult Care Food Program Total CFDA Number 10.558 Summer Food Service Program for Children Summer Food Service Program for Children Total CFDA Number 10.559 Total Passed Through Texas Dept. of Agriculture Total U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S. Department of Defense Direct Programs Community Economic Adjustment Planning Assistance for Joint Land Use Studies Total CFDA Number 12.610 Total U.S. Department of Defense Federal Program or CFDA Pass -Through Award Disbursements/ Number Grantor's Number Amount Expenditures 10.557 2014-045103 918,336 (1,564) 2015-047290 963,369 965,690 1,881,705 964,126 1,881,705 964,126 10.558 CE -ID 01507 166,173 139,304 166,173 139,304 10.559 CE -ID 01507 250,000 245 CE -ID 01507 150,000 54,616 12.610 EN0724-11-01 400,000 54,861 566,173 194,165 2,447,878 1,158,291 237,500 (288) 237,500 (288) 237,500 (288) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Direct Programs CDBG Entitlement Cluster: Comm. Dev.Block Grant -Entitlement Grant 11-12 14.218 B11-MC48-0502 3,054,750 68,001 Comm. Dev.Block Grant -Entitlement Grant 12-13 B12-MC48-0502 2,592,315 81,920 Comm. Dev.Block Grant -Entitlement Grant 13-14 B13-MC48-0502 2,727,941 621,618 Comm. Dev.Block Grant -Entitlement Grant 14-15 B14-MC48-0502 2,559,415 1,250,384 Total CFDA Number 14.218 10,934,421 2,021,923 Emergency Solutions Grants Program 11-12 S11-MC48-0502 175,323 (2,516) Emergency Solutions Grants Program 13-14 S13-MC48-0502 189,118 13,784 Emergency Solutions Grants Program 14-15 S14-MC48-0502 221,614 148,891 Total CFDA Number 14.231 586,055 160,159 Home Investment Partnerships Program 09-10 14.239 M -09 -MC -48-0502 1,782,635 1,101,199 Home Investment Partnerships Program 10-11 M -10 -MC -48-0502 1,775,515 65,018 Home Investment Partnerships Program 11-12 M -11 -MC -48-0502 1,331,043 100,595 Home Investment Partnerships Program 12-13 M -12 -MC -48-0502 257,514 87,535 Home Investment Partnerships Program 13-14 M -13 -MC -48-0502 986,021 87,112 Home Investment Partnerships Program 14-15 M -14 -MC -48-0502 824,920 374,285 Total CFDA Number 14.239 6,957,648 1,815,744 Fair Housing Assistance Program State and Local 14.401 FF206K116008 64,450 20,672 Total CFDA Number 14.401 64,450 20,672 Total Direct Programs 18,542,574 4,018,498 Total U.S. Department of HUD 18,542,574 4,018,498 319 City of Corpus Christi SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL/STATE EXPENDITURES OF AWARDS FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Federal Grantor/Pass-Through Grantor State Grantor/Program Title Federal Program or CFDA Pass -Through Award Disbursements/ Number Grantor's Number Amount Expenditures U. S. Department of the Interior Direct Program Desalination Pilot Study 15.506 R13AC80020 200,000 28,540 Total CFDA Number 15.506 200,000 28,540 Passed through Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Clean Vessel Act Program 15.616 V -14-1-(E) 102,750 102,750 Total CFDA Number 15.616 102,750 102,750 Boating Infrastructure Grant Program 15.622 Y -23-D 502,496 502,496 Total CFDA Number 15.622 502,496 502,496 Passed through Texas General Land Office Coastal Impact Assistance Program Total CFDA Number 15.668 Total U.S. Department of Interior U.S. Department of Justice JAG Program Cluster: Direct Programs Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Total CFDA Number 16.738 Victims of Crime Act Victims of Crime Act Victims of Crime Act Victims of Crime Act Victims of Crime Act Victims of Crime Act Total CFDA Number 16.575 Violence Against Women Formula Grant Program Violence Against Women Formula Grant Program Violence Against Women Formula Grant Program Total CFDA Number 16.588 Federal Confiscated Property Federal Account Total CFDA Number 16.XXX Total Direct Programs Passed through Office of the Attorney General Texas Office of the Attorney General Southern ICAC Task Force Total CFDA Number 16.800 Total U.S. Department of Justice 15.668 13-283-000-7529 16.738 2012 -DJ -BX -0822 2013 -DJ -BX -0850 2014 -DJ -BX -0826 2015-DJ-BX0616 1,500,000 791,632 1,500,000 791,632 2,305,246 1,425,418 169,575 162,583 168,613 149,112 649,883 3,510 5,619 54,182 74,556 137,867 16.575 VA -13-V30-15223-14 79,189 (12,215) 1522315 77,084 76,238 2015-VA-GX-0009 188,264 10,151 VA -14-V30-26771-01 67,661 (6,341) 2677102 68,163 62,267 2015-VA-GX-0009-02 84,796 507 565,157 130,607 16.588 WF -13-V30-15171-15 43,824 (4,618) 1517116 44,346 44,173 2016 -SF -ST -0015 34,646 4,499 122,816 44,054 16.XXX N/A 384,968 384,968 384,968 384,968 1,722,824 697,496 16.800 1557115 19,800 19,208 19,800 19,208 1,742,624 716,704 320 City of Corpus Christi SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL/STATE EXPENDITURES OF AWARDS FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Federal Grantor/Pass-Through Grantor State Grantor/Program Title U.S. Department of Transportation Direct Programs Airport Improvement Programs Runway 17/35 Extension, Phase 1; Runway 13/31 Extension Upgrade Security Systems With Asscociated Electrical Systems Runway 17/35 Extension Dispmnent and Associated Taxiway Runway 13/31 Ext Displacement and Connecting Taxiway Rehabilitate Taxiways B, Bl, B2, B3, B4 and B5 at CCIA Rehabilitate Taxiways D, E, F and G; Construct Taxiways H and 3 Total CFDA Number 20.106 Small Community Air Service Development Total CFDA Number 20.930 Total Direct Programs Passed through Texas Dept. of Transportation Highway Planning and Construction Highway Planning and Construction Total CFDA 20.205 Total Passed through Texas Dept. of Transportation Passed through State Dept. of Highways and Public Transportation Highway Safety Cluster: State and Community Highway Safety State and Community Highway Safety Total CFDA Number 20.600 Federal Program or CFDA Pass -Through Award Disbursements/ Number Grantor's Number Amount Expenditures 20.106 3-48-0051-47 3-48-0051-48 3-48-0051-49 3-48-0051-50 3-48-0051-51 3-48-0051-52 20.930 WAG2012-SCASDP-26 20.205 0916-35-180 0916-35-181 20.600 2014-CorpusPD-S-1YG-0042 2015-CorpusPD-S-1YG-0060 2,596,792 3,365,113 16,345,505 23,277,531 6,500,000 5,000,000 52,336 12,865 1,035,025 11,370,023 4,551,566 3,714,427 57,084,941 20,73 6,242 300,000 1,472 300,000 1,472 57,384,941 20,737,714 181,318 663,193 844,511 844,511 96,398 98,082 194,480 181,318 663,193 844,511 844,511 6,546 91,506 98,052 Occupant Protection Incentive 20.602 2015-CorpusPD-CIOT-00061 19,988 15,761 Total CFDA Number 20.602 19,988 15,761 Total Highway Safety Cluster 214,468 113,813 Total Passed Through State Dept. of Hwys & Public Transp. 214,468 113,813 Total U.S. Department of Transportation 58,443,920 21,696,038 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Direct Programs Employment Discrimination State & Local Fair 30.002 EEC45015C0035 49,350 49,350 Total CFDA Number 30.002 49,350 49,350 Total Direct Programs 49,350 49,350 Total Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 49,350 49,350 Institute of Museum and Library Services Passed through Texas State Library & Archives Commission Library Services Texas Reads Grant Program Impact Grant Program Special Projects Grant Program Total CFDA Number 45.310 Total Passed Through TSLAC Total Institute of Museum and Library Services 45.310 321 451-15003 475-15005 478-15005 3,000 8,373 37,226 48,599 48,599 48,599 3,000 8,373 37,226 48,599 48,599 48,599 City of Corpus Christi SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL/STATE EXPENDITURES OF AWARDS FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Federal Grantor/Pass-Through Grantor State Grantor/Program Title Federal Program or CFDA Pass -Through Award Disbursements/ Number Grantor's Number Amount Expenditures U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed through Texas Department of Aging & Disability Svc passed through CBCOG-AAA Aging Cluster: Special Programs for the Aging Title III, Part B Grants For Supportive Services and Senior Centers 93.044 AA3-1148-4 11,705 11,705 Total CFDA Number 93.044 11,705 11,705 Special Programs for the Aging Title III, Part C Nutrition Svcs 93.045 AA3-1148-4 513,411 38,670 Special Programs for the Aging Title III, Part C Nutrition Svcs AA3-1148-4 548,121 548,121 Special Programs for the Aging Title III, Part C Nutrition Svcs AA3-1148-4 547,321 486,733 Total CFDA Number 93.045 1,608,853 1,073,524 Nutrition Services Incentive Program 93.053 AA3-1148-4 119,530 119,530 Total CFDA Number 93.053 119,530 119,530 Total Aging Cluster 1,740,088 1,204,759 Total Passed Through DADS 1,740,088 1,204,759 Passed through National Recreation and Park Association Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Healthy Communities Program - ACHIEVE 93.283 n/a 40,000 (30) Total CFDA Number 93.283 40,000 (30) Total Passed Through NAPA 40,000 (30) Passed through Texas Department of Family & Protective Services Promoting Safe and Stable Families Promoting Safe and Stable Families Promoting Safe and Stable Families Promoting Safe and Stable Families Total CFDA Number 93.556 Total Passed Through Dept. of Family & Protective Services 93.556 23792861 290,078 (816) 23792861 145,039 122,049 24186672 155,425 151,079 24186672 297,574 5,732 888,115 278,044 888,115 278,044 Passed through Texas Department of State Health Svs CPS -Laboratory Response Network-PHEP 93.074 2015-001139-01 167,603 135,899 CPS -Laboratory Response Network-PHEP 2016-001139-00 201,123 20,575 Total CFDA Number 93.069 368,726 156,474 Project Grants and Cooperative Agreements for 93.116 Tuberculosis Control Programs 2015-002508-01 64,693 40,577 Total CFDA Number 93.116 64,693 40,577 Immunization Grants 93.268 2014-000014-00 241,637 (23,885) Immunization Grants 2015-000014-00 241,637 214,228 Immunization Grants 2016-000014-00 241,637 23,358 Total CFDA Number 93.268 724,911 213,701 Preventive Health and Health Services Block Grant 93.991 2014-000023-00 164,368 (2,585) Preventive Health and Health Services Block Grant 2015-000023-00 164,368 135,986 Preventive Health and Health Services Block Grant 2016-000023-00 328,736 5,632 Total CFDA Number 93.991 657,472 139,033 Total Passed Through Dept. of State Health Svs 1,815,802 549,785 Total U.S. Department of Health & Human Services 4,484,005 2,032,558 322 City of Corpus Christi SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL/STATE EXPENDITURES OF AWARDS FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Federal Grantor/Pass-Through Grantor State Grantor/Program Title Corporation for National and Community Service Direct Programs Retired and Senior Volunteer Program Retired and Senior Volunteer Program Total CFDA Number 94.002 Senior Companion Program Senior Companion Program Total CFDA Number 94.016 Total Direct Programs Total Corp. for National and Community Service Executive Office of the President Direct Programs High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas Program High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas Program Total CFDA Number 95.001 Total Direct Programs Total Executive Office of the President U.S. Department of Homeland Security Homeland Security Cluster: Passed through Texas Department of Public Safety Emergency Management Performance Grant Total CFDA Number 97.042 State Homeland Security Program State Homeland Security Program State Homeland Security Program Total CFDA Number 97.067 Metropolitan Medial Response Sytem Total CFDA Number 97.071 Total passed through Texas Department of Public Safety Federal Program or CFDA Pass -Through Award Disbursements/ Number Grantor's Number Amount Expenditures 94.002 14SRWTX004 47,934 12,414 14SRWTX004 48,434 23,601 96,368 36,015 94.016 13SCW1X001 264,007 182,613 13SCWTX001 324,067 77,774 588,074 260,387 684,442 296,402 684,442 296,402 95.001 G13HN0006A 156,840 2,883 G14HN0006A 165,700 149,374 322,540 152,257 322,540 152,257 322,540 152,257 97.042 2014 -EP -00011 97.067 EMW-2013-SS-00045 EMW-2014-SS-00029 EMW-2014-SS-00029 97.071 EMW-2011-SS-00019 69,534 69,534 126,808 161,165 73,235 361,208 267,608 267,608 698,350 69,534 69,534 41,316 106,079 25,678 173,073 (1,453) (1,453) 241,154 Passed Through Texas Department of Public Safety Passed Through Nueces County FY11 Operation Stonegarden Grant Program 97.067 EMW-2011-SS-00019 245,503 (97,148) FY12 Operation Stonegarden Grant Program EMW-2012-SS-0018-S01 126,000 44,939 FY13 Operation Stonegarden Grant Program EMW-2013-SS-00045 262,595 303,101 FY14 Operation Stonegarden Grant Program EMW-2014-SS-00029 285,951 36,970 Total CFDA Number 97.067 920,049 287,862 Total Passed Through TDPS and Nueces County 1,618,399 529,016 Total Homeland Security Cluster 1,618,399 529,016 Direct Program Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Total CFDA Number 97.044 Total Direct Programs 97.044 EMW-2012-FH-00079 3,380,824 530,266 3,380,824 530,266 3,380,824 530,266 323 City of Corpus Christi SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL/STATE EXPENDITURES OF AWARDS FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Federal Grantor/Pass-Through Grantor State Grantor/Program Title Passed through W.J. Wagner, Inc. Port Security Grant Program Total CFDA Number 97.056 Total Passed Through W.J. Wagner, Inc. Total U.S. Department of Homeland Security Total Federal and Passed -through Assistance State Assistance: State Comptroller of Public Accounts State General Revenue Law Enforcement Fire Prevention Total SGR Total State Comptroller of Public Accounts Texas Attorney General's Office Direct Program State Confiscated Property Total Direct Program Total Texas Attorney General's Office Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Direct Programs Wetland Construction, Habitat Enhancements at Oso Park Air Quality Planning Activities Total Direct Programs Total Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Texas Department of Aging & Disability Passed through Corporation for National & Community Service Retired and Senior Volunteer Program Senior Companion Program Total Passed Through CNCS Total Texas Department of Aging & Disability Texas Department of Agriculture Direct Programs Texans Feeding Texans Program Texans Feeding Texans Program Total Direct Programs Total Texas Deptartment of Agriculture Texas Department of Family and Protective Services Direct Programs Promoting Safe and Stable Families Promoting Safe and Stable Families Promoting Safe and Stable Families Promoting Safe and Stable Families Total Direct Programs Total Texas Department of Family & Protective Services Federal CFDA Number 97.056 324 Pass -Through Grantor's Number EM W -2013 -PU-00134- S 01 N/A N/A 2008-014 582-14-40055 13RZWTX022 13SZWTX002 HDM-14-1210 HDM-15-1420 23792861 23792861 24186672 24186672 Program or Award Amount 66,191 66,191 66,191 5,065,414 94,374,091 11,412 11,412 11,412 565,208 565,208 565,208 29,324 596,195 625,519 625,519 21,671 5,756 27,427 27,427 62,143 49,796 111,939 111,939 96,693 48,346 51,808 99,191 296,039 296,039 Disbursements/ Expenditures 56,581 56,581 56,581 1,115,863 32,709,690 993 993 993 565,208 565,208 565,208 29,297 320,250 349,547 349,547 15,819 4,479 20,298 20,298 31,958 24,157 56,115 56,115 (272) 40,683 50,360 1,911 92,682 92,682 City of Corpus Christi SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL/STATE EXPENDITURES OF AWARDS FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Federal Grantor/Pass-Through Grantor State Grantor/Program Title Texas Department of Public Safety Direct Programs Local Border Security Local Border Security Total Direct Programs Total Texas Department of Public Safety Federal Program or CFDA Pass -Through Award Disbursements/ Number Grantor's Number Amount Expenditures LBSP-13-09 LBSP-14-0009 85,000 45,000 130,000 130,000 8,346 41,682 50,028 50,028 Texas Department of State Health Services Direct Programs TB/PC 2015-001398-00 62,173 51,330 TB/PC 2016-001398-00 61,645 4,331 Texas Healthy Communities 2015-047255-00 50,000 45,802 Infectious Disease Control 2015-001102-00 5,000 3,126 Total Direct Programs 178,818 104,589 Total Texas Department of State Health Services 178,818 104,589 Texas Department of Transportation Direct Programs Grant for Routine Airport Maintenance Program Total Direct Programs Total Department of Transportation Texas Department of Motor Vehicles Direct Programs Corpus Christi Auto Theft Prevention Grant Corpus Christi Auto Theft Prevention Grant Total Direct Programs Total Texas Department of Motor Vehicles Texas Parks and Wildlife Direct Programs Oso Conservation and Interpretive Park Total Direct Programs Total Texas Parks and Wildlife Total State Assistance Total Federal, Pass Through & State Financial Assistance 325 M1516CORP 2015 -T01 -City of -00020 608-16-1780200 48-001095 50,000 50,000 50,000 392,474 527,853 920,327 920,327 500,000 500,000 500,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 343,368 42,487 385,855 385,855 467,322 467,322 467,322 3,416,689 2,142,637 $ 97,790,780 $ 34,852,328 CP.Vg*I3 0 g, IIS ►Emi 104114ffL�i1 C 4RPORA� 1852 City of Corpus Christi NOTES TO SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL/STATE EXPENDITURES OF AWARDS FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 1. General The accompanying Schedule of Federal/State Expenditures of Awards presents the activity of all Federal and State financial assistance programs of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. The City's reporting entity is defined in Note 1 to the City's basic financial statements. All Federal financial assistance received directly from Federal agencies or passed through other governmental agencies is included on the Schedule. 2. Basis of Accounting The accompanying Schedule of Federal/State Expenditures of Awards is presented using the modified accrual basis of accounting, which is described in Note 2 to the City's basic financial statements. 3. Relationship to Basic Financial Statements A reconciliation of Federal and State Program expenditures as reported in the City's basic financial statement follows: General Fund $ 49,350 Special Revenue Funds Federal/State Grants 11,617,206 Corpus Christi Community Improvement Corporation 1,815,744 Enterprise Funds Airport Fund 20,736,242 Utility System Fund (Water) 28,540 Marina Fund 605,246 Total expenditures $ 34,852,328 4. Relationship to Federal Financial Reports Amounts reported in the Schedule of Federal/State Expenditures of Awards may not agree with the amounts reported in the related Federal/State financial reports filed with grantor agencies because of accruals which would be included in the next report filed with the agencies. 5. Sub -recipients Of the federal expenditures presented in the Schedule, the City provided federal awards to sub -recipients as follows: Community Development Block Grant (CFDA 14.218) $ 298,921 Emergency Shelter Grant Program (CFDA 14.231) 148,891 $ 447,812 327 City of Corpus Christi 6. Outstanding Loans In prior years, the City has provided loans through its various Community Development Block Grant programs (CFDA 14.218). The outstanding balance of the loans receivable at September 30, 2015 was $8,855,321.91. In prior years, the City has provided loans through its various Home Investment Partnership programs (CFDA 14.239). The outstanding balance of the loans receivable at September 30, 2015 was $4,920,745.24. 328