Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet City Council - 01/24/2017
Corpus Christi 1201 Leopard Street f' Corpus Christi,TX 78401 cctexas.com Meeting Agenda - Final City Council Tuesday,January 24,2017 2:00 PM Council Chambers Public Notice - - THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE PROHIBITED IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE WILL BE PROVIDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL AT APPROXIMATELY 5:30 P.M. ON CITY-RELATED MATTERS THAT ARE NOT SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA. PUBLIC COMMENT ON AGENDA ACTION ITEMS WILL BE HEARD AT THE TIME THE COUNCIL CONSIDERS THE AGENDA ITEM. CITIZEN COMMENTS WILL BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES. Please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Any electronic media (e.g. CD, DVD, flash drive) that the Public would like to use while they speak to the City Council MUST be submitted a minimum of 24 hours prior to the meeting. Please contact the Public Communications department at 361-826-3211 to coordinate. Si Usted desea dirigirse al Concilio y cree que su ingles es limitado, habra un interprete ingles-espano/en todas las juntas del Concilio para ayudarle. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or services are requested to contact the City Secretary's office(at 361-826-3105) at least 48 hours in advance so that appropriate arrangements can be made. A. Mayor Dan McQueen to call the meeting to order. B. Invocation to be given by Mrs. Dorothy Dundas, Texas Apostolic Prayer Network. C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States to be led by Commander Kelly Isaacks, Corpus Christi Police Department. D. City Secretary Rebecca Huerta to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. E. Proclamations / Commendations 1. 17-0131 Swearing-In Ceremony for Newly Appointed Board, Commission and Committee Members. F. CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS / UPDATE ON CITY OPERATIONS: Corpus Christi Page 1 Printed on 1/23/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final January 24,2017 a. OTHER G. MINUTES: 2. 17-0124 Regular Meeting of January 17, 2017. Attachments: Minutes-January 17, 2017 H. SPECIAL CONSIDERATION ITEM: 3. 17-0155 Resignation of Mayor Discussion and consideration of Mayor Dan McQueen's resignation. Attachments: Agenda Memo- McQueen Resignation.pdf Letter of Resignation- McQueen.pdf I. BOARD &COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: 4. 17-0159 Animal Care Advisory Committee City Council's Youth Advisory Committee Corpus Christi Aquifer Storage and Recovery Conservation District Library Board Attachments: Animal Care Advisory Committee.pdf City Council's Youth Advisory Committee.pdf Corpus Christi Aquifer Storage and Recovery Conservation District.pdf Library Board.pdf J. EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION: For administrative convenience, certain of the agenda items are listed as motions, resolutions, or ordinances. If deemed appropriate, the City Council will use a different method of adoption from the one listed;may finally pass an ordinance by adopting it as an emergency measure rather than a two reading ordinance,or may modify the action specified. A motion to reconsider may be made at this meeting of a vote at the last regular, or a subsequent special meeting,such agendas are incorporated herein for reconsideration and action on any reconsidered item. K. CONSENT AGENDA: (ITEMS 5 - 17) NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: The following items are consent motions, resolutions, and ordinances of a routine or administrative nature. The Council has been furnished with background and support material on each item, and/or it has been discussed at a previous meeting. All items will be acted upon by one vote without being discussed separately unless requested by a Council Member or a citizen, in which event the item or items will immediately be withdrawn for individual consideration in its normal sequence after the items not requiring separate discussion have been acted upon. The remaining items will be adopted by one vote. 5. 17-0012 Appointing Financial Advisor for Solid Waste Certificates of Obligation Corpus Christi Page 2 Printed on 1/23/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final January 24, 2017 Motion authorizing the appointment of M. E. Allison, & Co., as Financial Advisor for the City of Corpus Christi, Texas Combination Tax and Limited Pledge Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Taxable Series 2017B in an amount not to exceed $2,500,000. Attachments: Agenda Memo Financial Advisor for Solid Waste CO's FA Contract for Solid Waste CO's 1295 for Solid Waste CO's 6. 17-0093 Resolution approving publication of Notice of Intention to Issue Certificates of Obligation Resolution by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, authorizing and approving publication of Notice of Intention to issue Certificates of Obligation; complying with the requirements contained in Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12; and providing an effective date. Attachments: Agenda Memo N01 for Solid Waste Resolution -N01 (Solid Waste) 7. 17-0052 Reimbursement Resolution for Certificates of Obligation Resolution relating to establishing the City's intention to reimburse itself for the prior lawful expenditure of funds from the proceeds one or more series of tax-exempt or taxable obligations to be issued by the City in an aggregate amount not to exceed $9,650,000 for authorized purposes relating to constructing various City improvements; authorizing matters incident and related thereto; and providing an effective date. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Reimbursement Resolution for Remaining Bond 2014 Reimbursement Resolution for Bond 2014 Projects 8. 16-1376 Resolution approving a Homebuyer Assistance Program agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and the City of Corpus Christi. Resolution approving an agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and the City of Corpus Christi for Type A Affordable Housing Program - Homebuyer Assistance Program in the amount of$107,500; and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute said agreement. Attachments: Agenda Memo-Type A Agreement Resolution Type A CCHCD Agreement Agreement-Type A CCHCD 9. 16-1447 Engineering Construction Contract for Corpus Christi International Corpus Christi Page 3 Printed on 1/23/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final January 24, 2017 Airport (CCIA) Runway 18-36 and Associated Work Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with GL Contracting / Double Rafter H Construction Company, LLC. - Joint Venture of San Antonio, Texas in the amount of$1,094,167.18 for the CCIA Runway 18-36 and Associated Work for the Base Bid (Asphalt Option) with a 90/10% respective share of contract costs between the FAA and the City. Attachments: Agenda Memo CCIA Runway 18-36 and Associated Work Project Budget Runwav 18-36 and Associated Work w KSA Breakdown.xlsx Location Map- Runwav 18-36 and Associated Work.pdf Presentation - Runway 18-36 and Associated Work.pptx Form 1295-GL Contracting &DRH Construction JV.pdf 10. 17-0007 Engineering Construction Contract for City-Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Program (Capital Improvement Program) Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with IPR South Central LLC of Pasadena, Texas in the amount of$4,000,000 for the City-Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Program (ID/IQ) for the Total Base Bid. The initial contract is anticipated as a two (2) year (730 calendar days) base contract, with three (3) optional one (1) year (365 calendar days) extensions subject to availability of funding and satisfactory contractor performance. The optional contract extension will not exceed an amount of$2,000,000 per year and will be administratively authorized by the City Manager or designee based on available funding. (Capital Improvement Program) Attachments: Agenda Memo-WW IDIQ.docx Prosect Budget-WW IDIQ.xls Location Map-WW IDIQ.pdf Presentation -WW IDIQ.pptx Form 1295-WW IDIQ.pdf 11. 17-0008 Engineering Construction Contract for Greenwood Drive Storm Water Improvements Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Clark Pipeline Services, LLC. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$469,401.98 for the Greenwood Drive Storm Water Improvements. Corpus Christi Page 4 Printed on 1/23/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final January 24, 2017 Attachments: Agenda Memo Greenwood Storm Water Impr Project Budget Greenwood Drive Storm Water Impr Location Map Greenwood Drive Storm Water Presentation Greenwood Drive Storm Water Imp Form 1295 Clark Pipeline 12. 17-0015 Resolution approving a Supply Agreement for Liquid Caustic Soda Solution Resolution rejecting all initial bids submitted for the purchase of liquid caustic soda ("chemical"); finding that the purchase of the chemical is necessary to preserve and protect the public health and safety of the City's residents; obtaining pricing through competitive solicitation; and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a one-year supply contract for the chemical with Univar of Kent, Washington, in an amount not to exceed $1,362,882.00, of which an estimated expenditure of $908,588.00 in FY2016-2017 is funded by the Water Fund, and includes up to four one-year renewals. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Liquid Caustic Soda Bid Tabulation RFB 185A- Liquid Caustic Soda Resolution Univar vFinal3B KB Rev 1.6.17 Supply Agreement—Liquid Caustic Soda Solution Form 1295 13. 17-0062 Disbursement of Council Member Carolyn Vaughn's FY2016/2017 Salary &Car Allowance Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to distribute Council Member Carolyn Vaughn's FY2016/2017 budgeted salary and associated payroll taxes, which are not to be received by Council Member Vaughn, in the amount of$6,459.00, to Animal Care Services to be used to transport canines to other cities for the purpose of adoption and Council Member Carolyn Vaughn's FY2016/2017 budgeted car allowance and associated payroll taxes, which are not to be received by Council Member Vaughn, in the amount of$4,521.30, to Animal Care Services to be used for the provision of diagnostic testing and the treatment of cruelly treated canines housed at the City's Animal Care Services facility. Attachments: Agenda Memo-Vaughn Transfer to ACS.pdf 14. 17-0063 Disbursement of Council Member Paulette M. Guajardo's FY2016/2017 Salary Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an agreement with 911 Park Place d.b.a. Mission 911, a Texas non-profit corporation, of Corpus Christi Texas, in the amount of$4,950.73, to be Corpus Christi Page 5 Printed on 1/23/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final January 24, 2017 funded by Council Member Paulette M. Guajardo's FY2016/2017 budgeted city council salary and associated payroll taxes, which are not to be received by Council Member Guajardo, in support of programs provided by 911 Park Place d.b.a. Mission 911 in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. Attachments: Agenda Memo-Guaiardo's Salary.pdf Agreement-Guaiardo's Salary.pdf Form 1295-Guaiardo's Salary.pdf 15. 17-0058 Second Reading Ordinance - Conversion and reclassification of 24 Firefighter I positions to 24 Firefighter II - EMS positions effective February 1, 2017 pursuant to Resolution No. 030964 and Settlement Agreement (1st Reading 1/17/17) Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 030965 Section 4. to convert and reclassify 24 Firefighter I positions to 24 Firefighter II-EMS positions effective February 1, 2017 pursuant to Resolution No. 030964 and settlement agreement. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Reclasification of positions Ordinance - Reclasification of positions Approved Resolution regarding conversion and reclassificaiont of 24 Firefighter: 16. 17-0026 Second Reading Ordinance -Approving agreement and appropriating funds to reimburse developer for the construction of water arterial transmission and grid main line located south of South Padre Island Drive (SH 358), west of Flour Bluff Drive, along Glenoak Drive (1st Reading 1/17/17) Ordinance authorizing City Manager or designee to execute a water arterial transmission and grid main construction and reimbursement agreement ("Agreement") with David E. and Christine L. Harris ("Developer"), for the construction of a water arterial transmission and grid main line and appropriating $141,334.85 from the No. 4030 Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Trust Fund to reimburse the Developer in accordance with the Agreement. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Harris Acres, Blk 1, Lot 1-vFinal Ordinance - Harris Acres, Block 1, Lot 1 Presentation - Harris Acres, Block 1, Lot 1 17. 17-0009 Second Reading Ordinance -Accepting and appropriating two donations for the North Beach Breakwater Plaza, North Shoreline Repair and Enhancement Project (Bond 2012, Proposition 8) (1st Reading 1/17/17) Ordinance accepting and appropriating a donation in the amount of $25,000 from the USS Lexington and a donation in the amount of Corpus Christi Page 6 Printed on 1/23/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final January 24, 2017 $25,000 from the Texas State Aquarium in Fund No. 3530 for the North Beach Breakwater Plaza, North Shoreline Repair and Enhancement Project E12129; Changing the FY 2017 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030936 to increase revenues and expenditures by $50,000. (Bond 2012, Proposition 8) Attachments: Agenda Memo- Donations Ordinance - Donations Location Map- Donations L. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (ITEM 18) 18. 17-0050 Public Hearing and First Reading Ordinance to adopt the proposed Mustang/Padre Area Development Plan Ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Corpus Christi by adopting the Mustang/Padre Island Area Development Plan; defining the City's Comprehensive Plan policies on Mustang and Padre Island for protection of the environment, land use, transportation, economic development, public services, capital improvements, and plan implementation; rescinding the Mustang/Padre Island Area Development Plan adopted by City Council Ordinance #025725, April 20, 2004; providing for severance; and providing for publication. Attachments: Agenda Memo MustangPadre ADP Ordinance - Mustang-Padre Islande Master Plan with Exhibits rev Presentation - MustangPadre ADP M. REGULAR AGENDA: (ITEMS 19 - 20) The following items are motions, resolutions and ordinances that will be considered and voted on individually. 19. 17-0156 Changing the Start Time of City Council Meetings Discussion and consideration of changing the start time of the regular City Council Meetings. Attachments: Agenda Memo-Start Time of Meetings.pdf 20. 17-0089 Resolution approving Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) FY 2017 Annual Work Plan Resolution approving the concepts, direction, and general work plan for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP). Corpus Christi Page 7 Printed on 1/23/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final January 24, 2017 Attachments: Agenda Memo-SPMP Work Plan Resolution -FY 17 SPMP Council District List-SPMP 2017 Alphabetic Street Listing - FY 2017 Work Plan Location Map- FY 17 SPMP SPMP Update and 2017 Work Plan - POWERPOINT N. FIRST READING ORDINANCES: (ITEMS 21 -24) 21. 17-0090 First Reading Ordinance - Transferring and appropriating matching funds for the Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) and the Senior Companion Program (SCP) Grants Ordinance transferring $79,173 from the No. 1020 General Fund to and appropriating in the No. 1067 Parks and Recreation Grant Fund as matching grant funds for the Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) and transferring $76,903 from the No. 1020 General Fund to and appropriating in the No. 1067 Parks and Recreation Grant Fund as matching grant funds for the Senior Companion Program (SCP); amending Ordinance No. 030818 to authorize the transfer of matching grant funds for the RSVP and SCP programs budgeted in the No. 1020 General fund to and appropriate them in the No. 1067 Parks and Recreation Grant Fund for said programs. Attachments: Agenda Memo- RSVP and SCP FY17 General Fund Grant Match Ordinance - RSVP and SCP FY17 General Fund Grant Match 22. 17-0109 First Reading Ordinance -Accepting and approriating funds in the Community Enrichment fund for park improvements Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept and appropriate $318,198.30 in developer contributions, other donations and interest earnings in the 4720 Community Enrichment Fund for park improvements and other related projects as described on the attached and incorporated Exhibit A. Attachments: Agenda Memo-Community Enrichment Fund Appropriation Ordinance - Community Enrichment Fund Appropriation Attachment A-Community Enrichment Fund Appropriation Presentation on Community Enrichment Funds 23. 17-0115 First Reading Ordinance - Five Year Lease Agreement for Buccaneer Commission Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a five- Corpus Christi Page 8 Printed on 1/23/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final January 24, 2017 year lease agreement with Buccaneer Commission for the use of Tex Mex Railroad Depot located at 1800 block of Chaparral Street, in consideration of rental payments of$600 per month increasing to $750 per month in third year and $900 per month in fourth year; and providing for options to extend for up to two additional five-year terms with rental rates to be increased each five-year term by ten percent; and providing for publication. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Buc Days Lease for Tex Mex Railroad Ordinance Multi-term Lease with Buccaneer Commission Buc Days Lease Long Term Lease Buc Days Lease Exhibit A 24. 17-0114 First Reading Ordinance - Short-term Lease Agreement for Buccaneer Commission Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a short-term lease agreement with Buccaneer Commission for the use of Tex Mex Railroad Depot located at 1800 block of Chaparral Street, in consideration of rental payments of$600 per month, not to exceed six months. Attachments: Agenda Memo-Buc Days Short-Term Lease for Tex Mex Railroad Ordinance-Short-Term Lease with Buccaneer Commission Short-Term Lease with Buccaneer Commission Buc Days Lease Exhibit A O. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: (ITEMS 25 - 31) The following items are for Council's informational purposes only. No action will be taken and no public comment will be solicited. 25. 17-0011 Service Agreement for Mowing of Storm Water and Street Right-of-Ways Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a service agreement with 2Chainz Brush Clearing, LLC of Lolita, Texas, for mowing of storm water and street right-of-way, in accordance with Request for Bids No. 165, based on the lowest, responsive, responsible bid for a total amount not to exceed $367,772.00, with an estimated expenditure of$245,181.33 in FY2016-2017. The term of this contract will be for 12 months with options to extend for two additional 12-month periods, subject to the mutual consent of the City Manager and the contractor. Corpus Christi Page 9 Printed on 1/23/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final January 24, 2017 Attachments: Agenda Memo- Mowing of Storm Water and Right-of-Ways Bid Tabulation - Mowing of Storm Water and Right-of-Ways Service Agreement- Mowing of Storm Water and Right-of-Ways.pdf Form 1295- Mowing of Storm Water and Right-of-Ways.pdf 26. 17-0149 Service Agreement for the purchase of a Gas/Blower Flare for the Cefe F. Valenzuela Landfill Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a service agreement with Parnel Biogas. Inc., of Tulsa, Oklahoma, for the purchase of a gas/blower flare in accordance with Request for Bids No.184, based on lowest, responsive and responsible bid for a total amount not to exceed $271,475.64, to be funded by Solid Waste 2017 Certificates of Obligation. The term of the agreement is for 12 months. Attachments: Agenda Memo Landfill Gas Blower Flare Bid Tab - Landfill Gas Flare for Cefe Landfill.pdf Service Agreement Landfill Gas Flare Project vFinal Form 1295 Landfill Gas Blower Flare Presentation - Landfill Gas Extraction System-GCCS and Flare V6.0 (1-19-17) 27. 17-0018 Construction Contract and Professional Services Contract for Cefe F. Valenzuela Landfill Gas Collection and Control System (Capital Improvement Project) Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Tri Con Works, LLC. of Houston, Texas in the amount of$1,019,690 for the Cefe F. Valenzuela Landfill Gas Collection and Control System for the total base bid and to execute a contract for Construction Phase Engineering and Quality Assurance Services with SCS Engineers, Inc. from Austin, Texas in the amount of$268,000 for full-time construction management. (Capital Improvement Project) Attachments: Agenda Memo Cefe Gas Collection Prosect Budget Cefe V Gas Collection System Location Map Cefe Valenzuela Landfill gas Collection Presentation Cefe Gas Collection Contract for Professional Services- E16289 SCS Cefe GCCS Letter of Recomm and bid tab Form 1295 Tri Con Works From 1295 SCS Engineers 28. 17-0019 Engineering Construction Contract and two Materials Testing Agreements for Gollihar Road Improvements from Kostoryz Road to Weber Road (Bond 2014 Proposition 1) Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a Corpus Christi Page 10 Printed on 1/23/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final January 24, 2017 construction contract with Haas-Anderson Construction, Ltd. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$13,534,848.30 for Gollihar Road Improvements from Kostoryz Road to Weber Road for a total base bid and to execute a construction materials testing agreement with Rock Engineering in the amount of$63,725.00 for Gollihar Road from Weber to Carroll Lane and to execute a construction materials testing agreement with Rock Engineering in the amount of$59,359.00 for Gollihar Road from Carroll to Kostoryz. (BOND 2014 Proposition 1) Attachments: Agenda Memo Gollihar Road Prosect Budget Gollihar Location Map Gollihar Road Rock Weber to Carroll Rock Carroll to Kostoryz form 1295 Haas Form 1295 Rock E13088 Form 1295 Rock E13089 Presentation -Gollihar Road 29. 17-0020 Engineering Construction Contract for Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) FY 2017 - Street Overlays Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Bay, LTD. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$9,421,462.50 for the total base bid and two (2) one-year renewal options for the Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) street overlays and to execute two construction materials testing agreement with Rock Engineering for Part 1 -West in the amount of$74,965.00 and for Part 2 - East in the amount of$74,965.00 for SPMP street overlays. Attachments: Agenda Memo SPMP Prosect Budget SPMP Year 4 with formulas Location Map SPMP FY 2017 Overlays Presentation -SPMP Letter of Recomm BAY Form 1295 Bay CMT for West CMT for East Form 1295 Rock West Form 1295 East 30. 17-0024 Resolution approving the Wastewater Management Plan Resolution approving the City of Corpus Christi Wastewater Management Plan Final Report ("Final Report") regarding options for Corpus Christi Page 11 Printed on 1/23/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final January 24, 2017 improvements to the City's wastewater treatment plants ("WWTPs") and adopting Option 4D as stated in the Final Report which provides for following key infrastructure components: (1) construction of a new 12 million gallons per day (MGD) wastewater treatment facility at a new site ("New WWTP") with recommended location in the area between the current Allison and Greenwood WWTPs; (2) consolidation of existing wastewater flows at two WWTPs: the New WWTP and an upgraded and expanded 20 MGD plant on the Oso WWTP site, with Broadway and Whitecap WWTPs to remain in service for foreseeable future; and (3) decommissioning of the Allison, Laguna Madre, and Greenwood WWTPs. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Resolution WW Management Plan Resolution -WWTP Management Plan Exhibit A-WW Management Plan Presentation -Wastewater Management Plan-Jan-24-2017 rev2 31. 17-0108 Resolution supporting the introduction of Legislation authorizing a motor fuel tax on a local option basis for Residential Street Funding Resolution of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas supporting the introduction of Legislation authorizing a motor fuel tax on a local option basis for Residential Street Funding. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Local Option Gas Tax Resolution -85th Session Local option motor fuels tax P. BRIEFINGS: (ITEMS 32 - 35) Briefing information will be provided to the City Council during the Council meeting. Briefings are for Council information only. Council may give direction to the City Manager, but no other action will be taken and no public comment will be solicited. 32. 17-0154 Texas Municipal Retirement System Update Attachments: Agenda Memo -TMRS Presentation Presentation -Texas Municipal Retirement System Update 33. 17-0078 Water Quality Projects Update Attachments: Agenda Memo- Presentation Water Protects Presentation -Water Quality Update Protects 34. 17-0121 Affordable Housing Plan Corpus Christi Page 12 Printed on 1/23/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final January 24, 2017 Attachments: Agenda Memo-Affordable Housing Plan Presentation -Affordable Housing Plan Affordable Housing Plan 2016 35. 16-1326 Discovery - Carport Regulations Attachments: Agenda Memo-Carports Final Presentation -Carports Q. PUBLIC COMMENT FROM THE AUDIENCE ON MATTERS NOT SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA WILL BE HEARD AT APPROXIMATELY 5:30 P.M. A recording is made of the meeting; therefore, please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. This Public Comment period is for items that are NOT on the Agenda. Your presentation will be limited to three minutes. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Any electronic media (e.g. CD, DVD, flash drive)that the Public would like to use while they speak MUST be submitted a minimum of 24 hours prior to the Meeting. Please contact the Public Communications department at 361-826-3211 to coordinate. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT PROHIBITS THE CITY COUNCIL FROM RESPONDING AND DISCUSSING YOUR COMMENTS AT LENGTH. THE LAW ONLY AUTHORIZES THEM TO DO THE FOLLOWING: 1. MAKE A STATEMENT OF FACTUAL INFORMATION. 2. RECITE AN EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO THE INQUIRY. 3. ADVISE THE CITIZEN THAT THIS SUBJECT WILL BE PLACED ON AN AGENDA AT A LATER DATE. PER CITY COUNCIL POLICY, NO COUNCIL MEMBER, STAFF PERSON, OR MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE SHALL BERATE, EMBARRASS, ACCUSE, OR SHOW ANY PERSONAL DISRESPECT FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE STAFF, COUNCIL MEMBERS, OR THE PUBLIC AT ANY COUNCIL MEETING. THIS POLICY IS NOT MEANT TO RESTRAIN A CITIZEN'S FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. R. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (ITEMS 36 - 39) PUBLIC NOTICE is given that the City Council may elect to go into executive session at any time during the meeting in order to discuss any matters listed on the agenda, when authorized by the provisions of the Open Meeting Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, and that the City Council specifically expects to go into executive session on the following matters. If the Council elects to go into executive session regarding an agenda item, the section or sections of the Open Meetings Act authorizing the executive session will be publicly announced by the presiding officer. The City Council may deliberate and take action in open session on any issue that may be discussed in executive session. The description of an item in "Executive Sessions" constitutes the written interpretation by the City Attorney of Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code and his determination that said item may be legally discussed in Closed Meeting in compliance with Chapter 551 the Texas Government Code. Corpus Christi Page 13 Printed on 1/23/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final January 24,2017 36. 17-0152 Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to Article 11 of the City Charter, elections, resignation, Mayoral & City Council succession, and other matters of state law, ordinances, and City Council policies and procedures. 37. 17-0153 Executive session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to pending and potential employment law litigation against the City, the Health District, and/or the officers and employees of said entity(ies), including potential approval of settlement(s), authorization of employment of attorneys and experts, and other actions related to said litigation. 38. 17-0150 Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to potential economic development agreement(s) with entities that are considering the construction, expansion, and/or ownership of industrial facilities that will be consumers of water and wastewater services and pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.087 to discuss confidential commercial or financial information pertaining to the aforesaid business prospect(s) that the City seeks to have locate, stay or expand in or near the territory of the City and with which the City may conduct economic development negotiations and/or deliberate possible economic development issues concerning said business prospect(s). 39. 17-0151 Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to prior and prospective Construction Yard License(s) in public right-of-way with Realtex Construction and/or Cosmopolitan Corpus, LLC and/or TPEG Cosmo Completion, LLC and other entities for Mesquite Street, Lawrence Street, and/or Chaparral Street and pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.072 to deliberate the exchange, lease, or value of real property if deliberation in an open meeting would have a detrimental effect on the position of the governmental body in negotiations with a third person, related to publicly owned right-of-way in and adjacent to the aforementioned streets. S. ADJOURNMENT Corpus Christi Page 14 Printed on 1/23/2017 CorCorpus Christi 1201 Leopard Street F' Corpus Christi,TX 78401 r& cctexas.com Meeting Minutes City Council Tuesday,January 17,2017 2:00 PM Council Chambers Public Notice - - THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE PROHIBITED IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE WILL BE PROVIDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL AT APPROXIMATELY 5:30 P.M. ON CITY-RELATED MATTERS THAT ARE NOT SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA. PUBLIC COMMENT ON AGENDA ACTION ITEMS WILL BE HEARD AT THE TIME THE COUNCIL CONSIDERS THE AGENDA ITEM. CITIZEN COMMENTS WILL BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES. Please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Any electronic media (e.g. CD, DVD, flash drive)that the Public would like to use while they speak to the City Council MUST be submitted a minimum of 24 hours prior to the meeting. Please contact the Public Communications department at 361-826-3211 to coordinate. A. Mayor Dan McQueen to call the meeting to order. Mayor Pro Tem Carolyn Vaughn called the meeting to order. B. Invocation to be given by Pastor David Bendett, Rock City Church. Pastor David Bendett gave the invocation. C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States to be led by Dr. Gloria Randall Scott, Volunteer at Solomon Coles High School. Dr. Gloria Randall Scott led the Pledge of Allegiance. D. City Secretary Rebecca Huerta to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. City Secretary Rebecca Huerta called the roll and verified that a quorum of the City Council and the required Charter Officers were present to conduct the meeting. Charter Officers: City Manager Margie C. Rose, City Attorney Miles K. Risley and City Secretary Rebecca Huerta. Corpus Christi Page 1 Printed on 1/20/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes January 17, 2017 Present: 8- Council Member Rudy Garza,Council Member Paulette Guajardo,Council Member Michael Hunter,Council Member Joe McComb,Council Member Ben Molina,Council Member Lucy Rubio,Council Member Greg Smith, and Council Member Carolyn Vaughn Absent: 1 - Mayor Dan McQueen E. Proclamations /Commendations: 1. Swearing-In Ceremony for Newly Appointed Board, Commission and Committee Members. Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn conducted the swearing-in ceremony for newly appointed board, commission, and committee members. F. CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS / UPDATE ON CITY OPERATIONS: Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn referred to City Manager's Comments. City Manager Margie C. Rose reported on the following topics: a. OTHER 1) The Solid Waste Department, in conjunction with the United States State Department, has worked to host international visitors for the past two years. The City of Corpus Christi was notified that the City has become a designated international visitor location for international best practices in Solid Waste Services.Along with the designation from the State Department,staff has been invited to speak on a panel at the Solid Waste Institute of Sustainability at the end of the month in Arlington, Texas.2)City Manager Rose recognized the 2016 Employee of the Year Gerardo"Jerry"Vedia, Building and Grounds Custodian with Facilities Maintenance. 3)City Manager Rose recognized Jennifer Escobedo Ramirez, Contracts/Funds Administrator with Engineering Services,for being honored as a Corpus Christi Under 40 honoree by the Young Business Professionals. G. MINUTES: 2. Regular Meeting of January 10, 2017. Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn referred to approval of the minutes. Council Member Rubio made a motion to approve the minutes,seconded by Council Member Garza and passed unanimously. H. BOARD &COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: 3. Airport Board Committee for Persons with Disabilities Crime Control and Prevention District Board Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn referred to board and committee appointments. The following appointments were made: Corpus Christi Page 2 Printed on 1/20/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes January 17, 2017 Airport Board Council Member McComb nominated Paul A. Cameron,Jr. Council Member Rubio nominated Marc Gonzalez. Council Member Guajardo nominated Andrew Lehrman. Council Member Molina nominated Roy L. Cotham. Council Members Hunter, McComb, and Smith voted for Paul A. Cameron,Jr. Council Members Rubio, Vaughn, and Garza voted for Marc Gonzalez. Council Member Guajardo voted for Andrew Lehrman. Council Member Molina voted for Roy Cotham. With no nominee receiving a majority vote, a runoff was conducted between Paul A. Cameron,Jr. and Marc Gonzalez. Paul A. Cameron,Jr.was appointed with Council Members Smith, Guajardo, McComb, Molina, and Hunter voting for Paul A. Cameron, Jr. and Council Members Garza,Vaughn, and Rubio voting for Marc Gonzalez. Committee for Persons with Disabilities Council Member Garza made a motion to reappoint Richard Balli, Mary Bustos, Donnie Contreras,Joe A. DeLaGarza, and Anthony Zoccolillo,seconded by Council Member Molina and passed unanimously. Council Member Garza made a motion to appoint Anthony M. Navarrette and James (T.C.)Chadden,seconded by Council Member Molina and passed unanimously. Crime Control and Prevention District Council Member Garza made a motion to confirm the appointments of Jason M. McCahan (Mayor McQueen),Joan Veith (Council Member Hunter), Susie Saldana(Council Member McComb), R. Scott Leeton (Council Member Guajardo), Brian Rosas (Council Member Vaughn), Cissy L. Garcia(Council Member Molina), Randall Hicks (Council Member Rubio), Brandey Batey (Council Member Smith), and Christopher Cruz(Council Member Garza), seconded by Council Member Molina and passed unanimously. Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn nominated Terry M. Ray. Council Member Smith nominated Lloyd Stegemann. Council Member McComb nominated Florence D. East. Council Member Molina nominated Victor M. Mendoza. Lloyd Stegemann and Terry M. Ray received the highest number of votes and were appointed. I. EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION: J. CONSENT AGENDA: (ITEMS 4 - 12) Corpus Christi Page 3 Printed on 1/20/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes January 17, 2017 Approval of the Consent Agenda Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn referred to the Consent Agenda. City Secretary Huerta announced that Council Members Hunter and McComb were abstaining from the vote on Item 12. A council member requested that Item 9 be pulled for individual consideration. There were no comments from the public. A motion was made by Council Member Rubio,seconded by Council Member Hunter, to approve the Consent Agenda. The consent agenda items were passed and approved by one vote as follows: Aye: 8- Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member McComb, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Absent: 1 - Mayor McQueen Abstained: 0 4. Service Agreement for On-Call Plumbing Services for the Corpus Christi Fire Department Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a service agreement with Smart Plumbing, Inc., of Corpus Christi, Texas, for plumbing services, in accordance with Request for Bids No. 176, based on lowest, responsive and responsible bid for a total amount not to exceed $76,115.00, with an estimated expenditure of$51,000 in FY2016- 2017. The term of the agreement is for one year with option to extend for up to one additional one year period, subject to the approval of the Contractor and the City Manager, or designee. This Motion was passed on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: M2017-004 5. Amending Service Agreement to include Actuarial Services for the Human Resources Department Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to amend a service agreement with Foster& Foster Actuaries and Consultants of Ft. Meyers, Florida to provide professional actuarial services for the Human Resources Department for a total amount not to exceed $34,500.00 of which $7,666.67 is required in FY 2016-2017. The agreement is established for a three year period and includes an option to extend for one additional two year period, subject to the approval of the City Manager or designee. This Motion was passed on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: M2017-005 6. Reimbursement Resolution for Certificates of Obligation Corpus Christi Page 4 Printed on 1/20/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes January 17, 2017 Resolution relating to establishing the City's intention to reimburse itself for the prior lawful expenditure of funds from the proceeds one or more series of tax-exempt or taxable obligations to be issued by the City in an aggregate amount not to exceed $2,500,000 for authorized purposes relating to constructing various City improvements; authorizing matters incident and related thereto; and providing an effective date. This Resolution was passed on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 031037 7. Second Reading Ordinance -Aligning Funds after Debt Refunding (1st Reading 1/10/17) Ordinance authorizing the appropriation and transfer of approximately $2,781,207.34 of bond proceeds from various City Utility System CIP funds to Fund 3543 Streets TMPC CO CIP Fund; and the appropriation and transfer of approximately $2,781,207.34 of related debt liability from various City Utility System operating funds to Fund 2010 General Obligation Debt Service Fund; amending the Fiscal Year 2017 operating budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030965 to increase revenues and expenditures by approximately $2,781,207.34 each; and providing an effective date. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 031038 8. Second Reading Ordinance -Accepting and appropriating additional grant funding for Police support in the Houston High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) (1st Reading 1/10/17) Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept additional grant funding in the amount of$28,898.82 from the Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy, to support the Police Departments role in the Texas Coastal Corridor Initiative in the Houston High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA); and appropriating the $28,898.82 in the No. 1061 Police Grants Fund. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 031039 10. Second Reading Ordinance - Closing a utility easement located at 3749 Pope Drive (1st Reading 1/10/17) Ordinance closing, abandoning, and vacating a 0.028-Acre portion of an existing utility easement out of a part of Lot 16, Block 8 of Hopper Addition Corpus Christi Page 5 Printed on 1/20/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes January 17, 2017 No. 2, located at 3749 Pope Drive and requiring the owner, Fernando Fernandez, to comply with the specified conditions; authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a Utility Relocation Agreement; appropriating $31,000 into Gas Fund #4130 to be used to cap an 8-inch wrapped steel line and construct a new 8-inch wrapped steel line, and changing the FY 2016-2017 Operating Budget adopted by Ordinance number 030965- to increase revenues and expenditures each by $31,000. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 031040 11. Second Reading Ordinance -Appropriating funds for the Advance Funding Agreement and Interlocal Agreement for the Strategic Integration (Travel Demand Model) Feasibility Study (Bond 2014, Proposition 2) (1st Reading 1/10/17) Ordinance appropriating $368,000 of anticipated revenues from the Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT); authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an Advance Funding Agreement with TXDOT for the Strategic Integration (Travel Demand Model) Feasibility Study with a payment of$18,400 due to TXDOT for reimbursement of direct state costs, and to execute an Interlocal Agreement with the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) for their participation ($55,200) in this project. (Bond 2014, Proposition 2) This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: 031041 12. Second Reading Ordinance -Appropriating Funds for the Collier Pool Renovations Rebid Package B (Restroom and Office Building) (Bond 2012, Proposition 4) (1st Reading 1/10/17) Ordinance appropriating $29,943.70 from forfeited bid bond proceeds in the No. 3280 Park CIP Fund for the Collier Pool Renovations Rebid Package B (Restroom and Office Building) Project E14008; changing the FY 2017 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030936; increasing revenues and expenditures in the amount of $29,943.70. (Bond 2012, Proposition 4) This Ordinance was passed on second reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 6- Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Absent: 1 - Mayor McQueen Abstained: 2- Council Member Hunter and Council Member McComb Enactment No: 031042 Corpus Christi Page 6 Printed on 1/20/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes January 17, 2017 9. Second Reading Ordinance -Amending the Ethics Code as recommended by the Ethics Commission (1st Reading 1/10/17) Ordinance amending the City Code of Ethics by revising sections to expand conflict of interest prohibitions; to prohibit disclosure or use of confidential information; to prohibit City Councilmember from participating in appointment of a person who contributed $2700 or more to the Councilmember's campaign; to prohibit registration as a lobbyist within 2 years of leaving City service; to provide clarification of Ethics Commission review of Financial Disclosure Reports; providing for severance and providing for publication. Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn referred to Item 9, amendments to the Ethics Code as requested by the Ethics Commission. Senior City Attorney Lisa Aguilar and Ethics Commission Member Larry White responded to questions. Council members spoke regarding the following topics: clarification on Section 2-311(8)(e) related to an elected city official may not use their position to influence the action of a city official or employee in the performance of their duties related to a contract or business transaction; the definition of the word "order" in Section 2-311(20) related to council members shall not give any orders to any employee except through the city manager as provided by the City Charter;whether the Ethics Code provides a timeframe for an employee to be hired as a consultant; consideration to include the language"pending"to Section 2-311(8)(e) related to contracts or business transactions; and consideration to table the item for further clarification. Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn called for comments from the public. Rick Milby,4412 High Ridge Drive, and member of the Ethics Commission, encouraged the City Council to support the amendments. Ray Madrigal,4253 Dody,spoke in support of Section 2-311(21)(E) prohibiting council participation in appointments of persons that contributed $2,700 or more to their campaign during the previous election. Gloria Scott,4422 S.Alameda,spoke regarding a council member using their position to influence the action of a city official or employee in the performance of their duties. Denise Matow,4520 Surfside Boulevard, spoke regarding the need to simplify the language in the Ethics Code and providing it to the public. Council Member McComb made a motion to table this item to the Council meeting of January 31,2017, seconded by Council Member Garza. This Ordinance was tabled to the city council meeting of January 31,2017 with the following vote: Aye: 8- Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member McComb, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Absent: 1 - Mayor McQueen Abstained: 0 L. REGULAR AGENDA: (ITEM 14) Corpus Christi Page 7 Printed on 1/20/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes January 17, 2017 14. One-Reading Action Item - Resolution supporting the economic development efforts of the Corpus Christi Regional Economic Development Corporation, the Port of Corpus Christi and other community partners to attract new businesses and industry to the Coastal Bend Resolution expressing the full support and continued cooperation for the partnerships, incentives, investments, and job-creating strategies which will diversify the Coastal Bend economy, sustain the economic engines driving these communities, protect and enhance the quality of life and environment, instill community pride and solidarity of spirit and achieve career goals through expansion of academic and job opportunities. Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 14. Director of Intergovernmental Relations Tom Tagliabue stated that the purpose of this item is to consider a resolution supporting the economic development efforts of the Corpus Christi Regional Economic Development Corporation (EDC), the Port of Corpus Christi, and other community partners to attract new businesses and industry to the Coastal Bend. Iain Vasey, President of the EDC, provided background on the project related to ExxonMobil and Saudi Arabia Basic Industries Corporation's (SABIC)site selection process for a$10 billion ethylene glycol manufacturing facility in the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). Rob Tully, Exxon Gulf Coast Growth Venture Executive, provided information on the following topics:the site evaluation process;the production of monoethylene glycol and polyethylene at the proposed facility; the creation of jobs; estimated annual salary;the economic impact; and plant safety. Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn called for comments from the public. Abel Alonzo, 1701 Thames; David Engel,230 Amistad and Port Commissioner; Gabe Guerra, Chair of the EDC; Tom Schmid,201 Walden Drive, Portland, Texas; Craig Loving, 1037 Stirman, and member of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 278; spoke in support of the project. Carrie Robertson Meyer, 4401 Gulf Breeze Boulevard,encouraged the City Council to meet with Portland Citizens United before voting on this issue that will impact the Gregory-Portland area. Errol Summerlin,1017 Diomede Street, Portland, Texas,spoke on behalf of Portland Citizens United in opposition to the location of proposed facility and safety concerns. Ray Madrigal,4253 Dody, spoke in opposition to this item.James Klein, 3501 Monterrey and a member of the Clean Economy Coalition, spoke regarding the City of Corpus Christi making a decision that impacts a neighboring city.Julie Rogers, 1324 North Mesquite and member of National Nurses United, asked the City Council to hold off on voting on this issue and discussed the impact the facility could have to public health. Denise Matow,4520 Surfside, spoke regarding the differences in opinion related to safety and the issue of unemployment. Chris Phelan, 3806 Kingston,spoke regarding tax abatements provided to private companies. Council members spoke regarding the following topics:whether the project would put the area in non-attainment;the impact to the water supply; public Corpus Christi Page 8 Printed on 1/20/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes January 17, 2017 involvement with the Portland community;the timeframe for the project; and safety. Council Member Smith made a motion to approve the resolution,seconded by Council Member Guajardo. This Resolution was passed and approved with the following vote: Aye: 8- Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member McComb, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Absent: 1 - Mayor McQueen Abstained: 0 Enactment No: 031043 K. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (ITEM 13) 13. Public Hearing and First Reading Ordinance -Amending the Code of Ordinances by revising Chapter 14 Development Services Article II City of Corpus Christi Technical Construction Codes and Chapter 55, Utilities Ordinance amending Section 14-281, 14-231, 14-291, and 55-37 of the City's Code of Ordinances to amend the City's adopted International Plumbing, Building and Residential Codes, authorize the City to inspect, install, repair, and replace backflow assemblies and place the cost of said work on customer utility bills, amend other requirements related to the provision of water to reduce the chance of contamination of the City's water supply, and providing for penalties, publication, severance, and an effective date. Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn deviated from the agenda and referred to Item 13. Interim Director of Development Services Julio Dimas stated that the purpose of this item is to amend the City's Code of Ordinances to address backflow and backflow connections. The recommended amendments include: allowing the City to use a third-party testing agency to test and certify delinquent backflow devices; appropriately charging for testing, repair or replacement to be placed on customer's utility bill; requiring annual testing for residential irrigation backflow prevention assemblies; and requiring Texas registered engineer certification annually for all facilities within the industrial district; requiring customer service inspection of properties with water wells; and conducting a public outreach campaign to educate the community about this new system, potential costs and other issues with backflow. Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn opened the public hearing. David Loeb,425 Del Mar, spoke in opposition to the annual inspection of residential irrigation systems and asked that consideration be given to city employees managing the inspection process. Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn closed the public hearing. Council members spoke regarding the following topics:the recent water situation being related to an industrial partner;taking steps to protect the water system in the industrial sector; annual inspection impacting residential Corpus Christi Page 9 Printed on 1/20/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes January 17, 2017 customers; the use of a third-party testing agency versus in-house inspections;taking actions to isolate the areas where water issues have occurred;the backflow devices used in the City of Houston to reduce the risk of terrorism; determining whether the company that supplies water meters offers backflow prevention devices that could be installed as meters are replaced; recommendation requiring air gap devices for top 30 users; the number of users with air gap devices; support to continue the three year inspection for residential or a compromise between one and three years; compliance with water code; the number of incidents identified with current irrigation systems; clarification of irrigation systems in the ordinance; enforcement of the current ordinances for industry; the number of devices in residential versus industry;the duties of the Mechanical/Plumbing Advisory Board; whether the City has a position to not turn off water; unregistered water wells being the suspected reason for water boils;the status of the recent water issues and list of recommendations; review of the industrial district agreements; clarification of the language in the ordinance referring to Governmental Property;the recommendation requiring a Texas registered engineer certification annually for all facilities within the industrial district and consideration for more frequent certification; researching best practices across the state recommended by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality(TCEQ); delinquency for backflow prevention inspections; and recommendations on enforcement. MOTION OF DIRECTION Council Member Garza made a motion directing the City Manager to review the Water Code to see what areas are not properly being enforced; bring back the report on the latest water incident; and research best practices,seconded by Council Member Smith and passed unanimously. Mr. Dimas stated that staff will bring back an ordinance that will allow the City to add appropriate charges to current customers'water utility bill and contract with a third-party testing agency. A motion was made by Council Member Guajardo,seconded by Council Member Joe McComb,that this Ordinance be tabled. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn called for a brief recess at 5:16 p.m. The Council reconvened the Council meeting at 5:32 p.m. P. PUBLIC COMMENT FROM THE AUDIENCE ON MATTERS NOT SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA WILL BE HEARD AT APPROXIMATELY 5:30 P.M. A recording is made of the meeting; therefore, please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. This Public Comment period is for items that are NOT on the Agenda. Your presentation will be limited to three minutes. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Any electronic media (e.g. CD, DVD, flash drive)that the Public would like to use while they speak MUST be submitted a minimum of 24 hours prior to the Meeting. Please contact the Public Communications department at 361-826-3211 to coordinate. Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn called for comments from the public. Susie Luna Saldana,4710 Hakel,spoke regarding comments made on social media by a council member and asked the individual to resign from the City Council. Corpus Christi Page 10 Printed on 1/20/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes January 17, 2017 Cheryl Martinez, 3938 Surfside,spoke regarding Animal Care Services including: use of a vacant building to house young animals; consideration of an advisory committee to address the Zika Virus;the need for additional staff; and trap and relase for cats. Denise Matow,4520 Surfside, requested that the City Council address a policy on soical media. Chris Phelan, 3806 Kingston, spoke in support of the City Council tabling the ordinance regarding backflow prevention devices and the importance of a chemical safety board investigation of the City's water supply. M. FIRST READING ORDINANCES: (ITEMS 15 - 18) 15. First Reading Ordinance - Conversion and reclassification of 24 Firefighter I positions to 24 Firefighter II - EMS positions effective February 1, 2017 pursuant to Resolution No. 030964 and Settlement Agreement. Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 030965 Section 4. to convert and reclassify 24 Firefighter I positions to 24 Firefighter II-EMS positions effective February 1, 2017 pursuant to Resolution No. 030964 and settlement agreement. Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn referred to Item 15. Fire Chief Robert Rocha stated that the purpose of this item is to convert and reclassify 24 Firefighter I positions to 24 Firefighter II -EMS positions effective February 1,2017 pursuant to Resolution No. 030964 and the Settlement Agreement. There were no comments from the Council or the public. Council Member Garza made a motion to approve the ordinance,seconded by Council Member Hunter. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 8- Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member McComb, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Absent: 1 - Mayor McQueen Abstained: 0 16. First Reading Ordinance -Approving agreement and appropriating funds to reimburse developer for the construction of water arterial transmission and grid main line located south of South Padre Island Drive (SH 358), west of Flour Bluff Drive, along Glenoak Drive. Ordinance authorizing City Manager or designee to execute a water arterial transmission and grid main construction and reimbursement agreement ("Agreement") with David E. and Christine L. Harris ("Developer"), for the construction of a water arterial transmission and grid main line and appropriating $141,334.85 from the No. 4030 Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Trust Fund to reimburse the Developer in accordance with the Agreement. Corpus Christi Page 11 Printed on 1/20/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes January 17, 2017 Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn referred to Item 16. Interim Director of Development Services Julio Dimas stated that the purpose of this item is to execute a water arterial transmission and grid main construction and reimbursement agreement with the owners of the property and appropriating $141,334.85 from the Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Trust Fund to reimburse the developer. The developer is required to install approximately 2,366 linear feet of 12-inch water line in order to provide water and to meet the requirements of the master water plan for the area. There were no comments from the public. Council members and staff spoke regarding the following topics: whether the developer complied with the requirements to receive reimbursement from the trust fund;the procedure for use of the trust funds; and a future policy setting a minimum higher than 1.5%of the cost when extending a water line; acreage fees; replenishment of the fund; and whether the City did the engineering on this project; and future users wanting to connect to the water line to receive service would have to pay a pro rata fee based on the frontage of their property to repay the fund. Council Member Garza made a motion to approve the ordinance,seconded by Council Member Rubio. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 8- Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member McComb, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Absent: 1 - Mayor McQueen Abstained: 0 17. First Reading Ordinance -Accepting and appropriating two donations for the North Beach Breakwater Plaza, North Shoreline Repair and Enhancement Project (Bond 2012, Proposition 8) Ordinance accepting and appropriating a donation in the amount of $25,000 from the USS Lexington and a donation in the amount of $25,000 from the Texas State Aquarium in Fund No. 3530 for the North Beach Breakwater Plaza, North Shoreline Repair and Enhancement Project E12129; Changing the FY 2017 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030936 to increase revenues and expenditures by $50,000. (Bond 2012, Proposition 8) Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn referred to Item 17. Director of Engineering Services Jeff Edmonds stated that the purpose of this item is to accept and appropriate donations from the Texas State Aquarium and U.S.S. Lexington for the North Beach Breakwater Plaza, North Shoreline Repair and Enhancement Project. There were no comments from the Council or the public. Council Member Garza made a motion to approve the ordinance,seconded by Council Member Hunter. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 8- Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member McComb, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Corpus Christi Page 12 Printed on 1/20/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes January 17, 2017 Absent: 1 - Mayor McQueen Abstained: 0 18. First Reading Ordinance -Approving the Amendment to the Revised Project and Financing Plans for the Reinvestment Zone Number Two Ordinance approving the amendment to the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 2 Amended Project & Financing Plan approved by the Board of Directors of Reinvestment Zone Number Two, Corpus Christi, Texas on January 17, 2017 regarding Park Road 22 Bridge Project, Packery Channel Monitoring and Improvements, and Budget Approval Process. This Ordinance was withdrawn. N. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: (ITEMS 19 - 29) Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn referred to Future Agenda Items. City Manager Margie C. Rose stated that staff had planned presentations on Items 19,20,25 and 26. 19. Appointing Financial Advisor for Solid Waste Certificates of Obligation Motion authorizing the appointment of M. E. Allison, & Co., as Financial Advisor for the City of Corpus Christi, Texas Combination Tax and Limited Pledge Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Taxable Series 2017B in an amount not to exceed $2,500,000. This Motion was recommended to the consent agenda. 20. Resolution approving publication of Notice of Intention to Issue Certificates of Obligation Resolution by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, authorizing and approving publication of Notice of Intention to issue Certificates of Obligation; complying with the requirements contained in Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12; and providing an effective date. This Resolution was recommended to the consent agenda. 21. Resolution approving a Homebuyer Assistance Program agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and the City of Corpus Christi. Resolution approving an agreement between the Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Page 13 Printed on 1/20/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes January 17, 2017 Business and Job Development Corporation and the City of Corpus Christi for Type A Affordable Housing Program - Homebuyer Assistance Program in the amount of$107,500; and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute said agreement. This Resolution was recommended to the consent agenda. 22. Engineering Construction Contract for Corpus Christi International Airport (CCIA) Runway 18-36 and Associated Work Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with GL Contracting / Double Rafter H Construction Company, LLC. - Joint Venture of San Antonio, Texas in the amount of$1,094,167.18 for the CCIA Runway 18-36 and Associated Work for the Base Bid (Asphalt Option) with a 90/10% respective share of contract costs between the FAA and the City. This Motion was recommended to the consent agenda. 23. Engineering Construction Contract for City-Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Program (Capital Improvement Program) Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with IPR South Central LLC of Pasadena, Texas in the amount of$4,000,000 for the City-Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Program (ID/IQ) for the Total Base Bid. The initial contract is anticipated as a two (2) year (730 calendar days) base contract, with three (3) optional one (1) year (365 calendar days) extensions subject to availability of funding and satisfactory contractor performance. The optional contract extension will not exceed an amount of$2,000,000 per year and will be administratively authorized by the City Manager or designee based on available funding. (Capital Improvement Program) This Motion was recommended to the consent agenda. 24. Engineering Construction Contract for Greenwood Drive Storm Water Improvements Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Clark Pipeline Services, LLC. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$469,401.98 for the Greenwood Drive Storm Water Improvements. This Motion was recommended to the consent agenda. 25. Resolution approving Street Preventative Maintenance Program Corpus Christi Page 14 Printed on 1/20/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes January 17, 2017 (SPMP) FY 2017 Annual Work Plan Resolution approving the concepts, direction, and general work plan for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP). This Resolution was recommended to the regular agenda. 26. Reimbursement Resolution for Certificates of Obligation Resolution relating to establishing the City's intention to reimburse itself for the prior lawful expenditure of funds from the proceeds one or more series of tax-exempt or taxable obligations to be issued by the City in an aggregate amount not to exceed $9,650,000 for authorized purposes relating to constructing various City improvements; authorizing matters incident and related thereto; and providing an effective date. This Resolution was recommended to the consent agenda. 27. Resolution approving a Supply Agreement for Liquid Caustic Soda Solution Resolution rejecting all initial bids submitted for the purchase of liquid caustic soda ("chemical"); finding that the purchase of the chemical is necessary to preserve and protect the public health and safety of the City's residents; obtaining pricing through competitive solicitation; and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a one-year supply contract for the chemical with Univar of Kent, Washington, in an amount not to exceed $1,362,882.00, of which an estimated expenditure of$908,588.00 in FY2016-2017 is funded by the Water Fund, and includes up to four one-year renewals. This Resolution was recommended to the consent agenda. 28. Disbursement of Council Member Carolyn Vaughn's FY2016/2017 Salary &Car Allowance Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to distribute Council Member Carolyn Vaughn's FY2016/2017 budgeted salary and associated payroll taxes, which are not to be received by Council Member Vaughn, in the amount of$6,459.00, to Animal Care Services to be used to transport canines to other cities for the purpose of adoption and Council Member Carolyn Vaughn's FY2016/2017 budgeted car allowance and associated payroll taxes, which are not to be received by Council Member Vaughn, in the amount of$4,521.30, to Animal Care Services to be used for the provision of diagnostic testing and the treatment of cruelly treated canines housed at the City's Animal Care Services facility. Corpus Christi Page 15 Printed on 1/20/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes January 17, 2017 This Motion was recommended to the consent agenda. 29. Disbursement of Council Member Paulette M. Guajardo's FY2016/2017 Salary Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an agreement with 911 Park Place d.b.a. Mission 911, a Texas non-profit corporation, of Corpus Christi Texas, in the amount of$4,950.73, to be funded by Council Member Paulette M. Guajardo's FY2016/2017 budgeted city council salary and associated payroll taxes, which are not to be received by Council Member Guajardo, in support of programs provided by 911 Park Place d.b.a. Mission 911 in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. This Motion was recommended to the consent agenda. O. BRIEFINGS: (ITEM 30) 30. Financing Options Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn referred to Item 30. City Manager Margie C. Rose stated that staff is presenting this briefing to be proactive on the financial options that may be available for future big ticket items that are coming forward for council's consideration. Director of Financial Services Constance Sanchez stated that the purpose of this item is to discuss the financing options to address the City's needs to address capital needs including wastewater improvements and consolidation, water capital improvements and streets. Ms. Sanchez introduced the presentation team: Financial Advisor Mark Seal and Bond Counsel Jeff Kuhn and Clay Binford. Ms. Sanchez presented the following information:the traditional financing options;the description and uses for general obligation bonds, revenue bonds, and certificates of obligation; alternate financing options including general obligation bonds for utilities and public/private partnership(P3);the pros and cons of funding utilities with general obligation bonds and 133; and a privatization decision tree. Council members spoke regarding the following topics: a breakdown of the City's current total debt;the City of Chicago's and City of San Antonio's use of a 133;the City of Chicago's current bond rating;whether P3's are used in debt-stressed cities; the City's current rating and capacity; original issued premium(0131); and the length of time M.E. Allison has been the City's financial advisor. Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (ITEMS 31 - 34) Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn referred to the day's executive sessions. The Council went into executive session at 6:44 p.m. The Council returned from executive session at 7:12 p.m. 31. Executive Session pursuant to Section Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule Corpus Christi Page 16 Printed on 1/20/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes January 17, 2017 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to the TxDOT Harbor Bridge Project and pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.072 to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property (including, but not limited to, area of and related to TC Ayers Park and other City Property in vicinity of existing or proposed Harbor Bridge) because deliberation in an open meeting would have a detrimental effect on the position of the governmental body in negotiations with a third person. This E-Session Item was discussed in executive session. 32. Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning the legal issues related to classification and conversion of Fire Department employees and Chapter 143 of the Texas Local Government Code. This E-Session Item was discussed in executive session. 33. Executive session pursuant to Texas Government Code 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to pending and potential employment law litigation against the City, the Health District, and/or the officers and employees of said entity(ies), including potential approval of settlement(s), authorization of employment of attorneys and experts, and other actions related to said litigation. This E-Session Item was discussed in executive session. 34. Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to Railroad Commission Applications of Petro Waste Environmental, LP to operate a commercial disposal facility in McMullen County, Texas on a 1500 acre tract located approximately four miles north of Tilden, Texas. Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn referred to Item 34 and the following motion was considered: Motion to authorize the execution of the attached Agreement with Petro Waste Environmental LP to provide for the City's withdrawal of its protest in the Petro Waste Application currently pending consideration by the Texas Railroad Commission in Oil &Gas Docket No. 01-0300585,with changes thereto in a form to be approved by the City Attorney. Council Member Garza made a motion to approve the motion, seconded by Council Member Rubio. This Motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Aye: 8- Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member McComb, Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Corpus Christi Page 17 Printed on 1/20/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes January 17, 2017 Absent: 1 - Mayor McQueen Abstained: 0 Enactment No: M2017-006 R. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:13 p.m. Corpus Christi Page 18 Printed on 1/20/2017 �yvs cr� �o 0 f, APmRpEAGENDA MEMORANDUM zs� City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 DATE: January 24, 2017 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Rebecca Huerta, City Secretary rebeccah(o)cctexas.com (361) 826-3105 Resignation of Mayor CAPTION: Discussion and consideration of Mayor Dan McQueen's resignation. PURPOSE: The City Council may consider Mayor Dan McQueen's resignation. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Mayor Dan McQueen submitted his written resignation to the City Secretary on January 18, 2017. Section 201 .023 of the Texas Election Code states, "If an officer submits a resignation, whether to be effective immediately or at a future date, a vacancy occurs on the date the resignation is accepted by the appropriate authority or on the eighth day after the date of its receipt by the authority, whichever is earlier". ALTERNATIVES: The City Council has two options: 1 . Vote to accept the resignation (resignation becomes effective upon acceptance); or 2. Take no action (resignation becomes effective on January 26, 2017). OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Not applicable. EMERGENCY / NON-EMERGENCY: Non-emergency. DEPARTMENTALCLEARANCES: Legal Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital x Not applicable Project to Date Fiscal Year: Expenditures 2016-2017 (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $0 $0 $0 Encumbered / Expended Amount $0 $0 $0 This item $0 $0 $0 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 Fund(s): NA Comments: None. RECOMMENDATION: None. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Mayor Dan McQueen's Letter of Resignation fy. `t x - 1111P 1111111111mil. P. RECEIVED JAN 1 7n17 Office Of The Mayor City Of Corpus Christi ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE BOARD DETAILS SIZE 71F C. The Animal Care Advisory Committee advises the City Council and City TERM LENGTH 3 Years Manager on all aspects of animal control OVERVIEW TERM LIMIT 6 Yearsincluding fees, staffing, ordinances, procedures and policies and facilities. The jurisdiction and actions of the Committee shall be advisory only. _................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ COMPOSITION It shall consist of seven (7)members.Terms will be for three-years.At least one F-�'k member shall be a veterinarian.Two members shall be members of local animal welfare organizations(at least one of the organizations must operate an animal shelter).The remaining four members shall represent the community at-large.All members shall serve until their successors are appointed and qualified and each DETAILS shall be a resident of the City.The City Manager or his representative and the Animal Care Services Manager shall serve as ex-officio members of the Committee without vote.The Committee,by majority vote,shall elect its own Chairman who shall preside at all meetings of the Committee and a Vice- Chairman who shall act as president in the absence of the Chairman.The Animal Care Services Manager or his designated representative shall serve as the secretary of the Committee.The Animal Care Advisory Committee is designated as the Animal Shelter Committee required by the Health and Safety Code. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... CREATION/AUTHORITY Section 2-115, Code of Ordinances.Ord. Nos. 14214-2/22/78; 17573-4/20/83; 17748-7/27/83;20294-5/3/88;024461 -5/22/01; 030405- 1/20/15. _.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. MEETS 3rd Thursday of every month, 12:30 p.m.,Animal Care Facility Conference Room, 2626 Holly. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... TERM DETAILS Three-year terms. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. DEPARTMENT Corpus Christi Police Department _.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. COMMITTEE/SUBCOMMITEE N/A AGENDAS ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. OTHER INFORMATION ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Animal Care Advisory Committee Members January 24,2017 One(1)vacancy with term to 5-31-17 representing the following category: 1-Community At-Large. • — Mark Phillips ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Resigned District 2 1 5/31/2017 Community At-Large Member Michelle Sanders ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Active District 5 Partial 5/31/2017 Community At-Large Member Samantha Person ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Active District 5 1 5/31/2019 Animal Welfare/Shelter Vice-Chair Cheryl Martinez ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Active District 1 2 5/31/2018 Animal Welfare Chair Megan Winn ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Active District 5 1 5/31/2018 Community At-Large Member Megan Tisdale ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Active District 4 1 5/31/2019 Community At-Large Member Dr.Sara Andux ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Active District 5 1 5/31/2019 Veterinarian Member Animal Care Advisory Committee Applicants January 24,2017 Melissa D.Bruton Animal Care Advisory Committee District 4 CCRV 80451H 37 Corpus Christi TX 361-289-5400 Community At-Large Linda A.Gibeaut Animal Care Advisory Committee District2 Community At-Large Sharon Ray Animal Care Advisory Committee Districts Gulf Coast Humane Society 3118 Cabaniss Corpus Christi TX 361-225-0845 Community At-Large Keera E.Seiger Animal Care Advisory Committee District4 Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi 6300 Ocean Dr. Corpus Christi TX Community At-Large Jake A.Trevino Animal Care Advisory Committee District 1 CC Area Oil Spill Control 1231 Navigation Blvd. Corpus Christi TX 361-438-6612 Community At-Large BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FOR A CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Nov 10, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Melissa _ D Bruton Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ism Street Address Suite or Apt Wft LOW City State Postal Code District 4 What district do you live in? lmmmwm� Primary Phone Alternate Phone CCRV sales representative Employer Job Title 8045 IH 37 Work Address-Street Address and Suite Number Corpus Christi Work Address-City Texas Work Address-State 78409 Work Address-Zip Code Melissa D Bruton Page 1 of 4 361-289-5400 Work Phone melissa@ccrv.net Work E-mail address Home/Primary Address Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: No Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) former zookeeper, volunteered at numerous animal care facilities, ran a pet sitting business, managerial experience Registered Voter? r• Yes r No Current resident of the city? r° Yes f No 3 If yes,how many years? Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Melissa D Bruton Page 2 of 4 Female Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. W I Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. V I Agree Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. 9 1 Agree Melissa D Bruton Page 3 of 4 Board-specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? fJ None of the Above Question applies to multiple boards. *Qualified elector/voter means a person who is 18 years of age or older; a United States Citizen; has not been determined by a final judgement of a court to be mentally incapacitated; has not been finally convicted of a felony or, if so convicted has fully discharged the person's sentence including incarceration, parole or supervision, or completed a period of probation ordered by an court; and a resident of this State. Melissa D Bruton Page 4 of 4 BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FOR A CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Jan 13, 2017 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Linda _ A Gibeaut _ Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ism Street Address Suite or Apt Wft LOW City State Postal Code District 2 What district do you live in? lmmmwm� Primary Phone Alternate Phone Employer Job Title Work Address-Street Address and Suite Number Work Address-City Work Address-State Work Address-Zip Code Linda Gibeaut Page 1 of 4 Work Phone Igibeaut@gmail.com Work E-mail address Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: No Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Some college, extensive volunteer history with PTA's in Austin, TX, volunteer at various events for animals, volunteer for various transport groups to pull animals from kill shelters Registered Voter? r• Yes r No Current resident of the city? r° Yes f No 3 If yes,how many years? Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Other Linda Gibeaut Page 2 of 4 Female Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. W I Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. V I Agree Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. 9 1 Agree Linda Gibeaut Page 3 of 4 Board-specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? fJ None of the Above Question applies to multiple boards. *Qualified elector/voter means a person who is 18 years of age or older; a United States Citizen; has not been determined by a final judgement of a court to be mentally incapacitated; has not been finally convicted of a felony or, if so convicted has fully discharged the person's sentence including incarceration, parole or supervision, or completed a period of probation ordered by an court; and a resident of this State. Linda Gibeaut Page 4 of 4 BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FOR A CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Oct 11, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Sharon _ Ray Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ism Street Address Suite or Apt Wft LOW City State Postal Code District 5 What district do you live in? lmmmwm� Primary Phone Alternate Phone Gulf Coast Humane Society Director Employer Job Title 3118 Cabaniss Work Address-Street Address and Suite Number Corpus Christi Work Address-City Texas Work Address-State 78415 Work Address-Zip Code Sharon Ray Page 1 of 4 3612250845 Work Phone Director@gchscc.org Work E-mail address Work Address Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: No Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Bachelor of Science 1991 Muncie IN. Registered Voter? r• Yes r No Current resident of the city? r Yes r No If yes,how many years? Executive_Director_Candidate_Sharon_Ray.docx Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Sharon Ray Page 2 of 4 Female Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. W I Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. V I Agree Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. 9 1 Agree Sharon Ray Page 3 of 4 Board-specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? fJ Animal Shelter Operator Question applies to multiple boards. *Qualified elector/voter means a person who is 18 years of age or older; a United States Citizen; has not been determined by a final judgement of a court to be mentally incapacitated; has not been finally convicted of a felony or, if so convicted has fully discharged the person's sentence including incarceration, parole or supervision, or completed a period of probation ordered by an court; and a resident of this State. Sharon Ray Page 4 of 4 Sharon Ray 1991 • The Salvation Army college for officer training —Atlanta, GA 1996 CAREER BACKGROUND: • Corps Officer—Arlington, VA ; Wilson, NC, Minneapolis MN — June 1996 — June 2005 • Divisional Youth Secretary— Missouri/ Southern Illinois June 2005 — June 2007 • Divisional Youth Secretary— North/South Carolina— June 2007- June 2011 • Associate area Commander and Kroc Administrator — Biloxi, MS. —June 2011- June 2013 • Associate Regional Commander — Corpus Christi, Texas — June 2013 - Present MEMBERSHIPS/ORGINAZATIONS/OTHER: • The Salvation Army SALARY EXPECTATION 45-60K BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FOR A CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Nov 30, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Keera _ E Seiger Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ism Street Address Suite or Apt Wft LOW City State Postal Code District 4 What district do you live in? INNNNNN� Primary Phone Alternate Phone Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi Student Employer Job Title 6300 Ocean dr. Work Address-Street Address and Suite Number Corpus Christi Work Address-City Texas Work Address-State 78412 Work Address-Zip Code Keera E Seiger Page 1 of 4 Work Phone kseiger@islander.tamucc.edu Work E-mail address Home/Primary Address Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: N/A Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Junior level Political Science student at TAMUCC, Bank Teller at Frost Bank for 2 years Registered Voter? r• Yes r No Current resident of the city? r Yes r No 21 If yes,how many years? Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Keera E Seiger Page 2 of 4 Female Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. W I Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. V I Agree Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. 9 1 Agree Keera E Seiger Page 3 of 4 Board-specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? fJ None of the Above Question applies to multiple boards. *Qualified elector/voter means a person who is 18 years of age or older; a United States Citizen; has not been determined by a final judgement of a court to be mentally incapacitated; has not been finally convicted of a felony or, if so convicted has fully discharged the person's sentence including incarceration, parole or supervision, or completed a period of probation ordered by an court; and a resident of this State. Keera E Seiger Page 4 of 4 BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FOR A CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Jun 20, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Jake _ A Trevino Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE, ARTS & CULTURAL COMMISSION Street Address Suite or Apt LOW City State Postal Code District 1 What district do you live in? lmmmwm� Primary Phone Alternate Phone Cc area oil spill control Hazmat tech Employer Job Title 1231 navigation blvd Work Address-Street Address and Suite Number Corpus christi Work Address-City Texas Work Address-State 78403 Work Address-Zip Code Jake A Trevino Page 1 of 4 3614386612 Work Phone jakstax457@gmail.com Work E-mail address Home/Primary Address Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Registered Voter? r Yes r No Current resident of the city? i-. Yes r No 25 If yes,how many years? Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Hispanic Jake A Trevino Page 2 of 4 Male Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. W I Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. V I Agree Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. 9 1 Agree Jake A Trevino Page 3 of 4 Board-specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? W None of the Above Question applies to ARTS&CULTURAL COMMISSION. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? W Public Art / Public Space Question applies to multiple boards. *Qualified elector/voter means a person who is 18 years of age or older; a United States Citizen; has not been determined by a final judgement of a court to be mentally incapacitated; has not been finally convicted of a felony or, if so convicted has fully discharged the person's sentence including incarceration, parole or supervision, or completed a period of probation ordered by an court; and a resident of this State. Jake A Trevino Page 4 of 4 City Of Corpus Christi CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE BOARD DETAILS IVa The City Council's Youth Advisory Committee assists SIZE • Seats and advises the City Council on city youth issues; TERM LENGTH 2 Years conducts surveys and determines the concerns and interests of the youth of Corpus Christi; encourages OVERVIEW youth leadership and responsibility through volunteerism and community involvement; creates opportunities for public discussion of youth issues through meetings, workshops and conferences; looks for ways to promote understanding, respect and community involvement among youth groups of all cultures and backgrounds and assists in planning, recommending and implementing youth activities. _................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ COMPOSITION Thirteen (13)primary members and thirteen (13)alternates selected by the F-Elk principal or the principal's designee of their respective campuses and ratified by the City Council.The members shall be composed of students in grades 11 or 12 that are City residents.Terms are for two(2)years,however,each member's term automatically expires three(3)months after high school graduation. High schools DETAILS represented by the youth committee include:Calallen,Carroll,Coles,Collegiate, Flour Bluff, Incarnate Word Academy,John Paul II, King, Miller, Moody, Ray, Tuloso-Midway and West Oso. If a primary committee member is unable to attend a scheduled meeting the alternate member will be contacted. . .............. . . ............... . .................................................................................................................................................................... . . ........................................................................................ CREATION/AUTHORITY Ordinance No. 026539, 11-14-05;Ordinance No.027947, 11-18-08;Ordinance No.028174,5-19-09.; Motion 2009-280,9-29-09;Ordinance 028325,9-29-09. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. MEETS 3rd Thursday of the month at 6:00 p.m.,October,January and May _.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. TERM DETAILS Two-year terms. _.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. DEPARTMENT Parks and Recreation Department ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. COMMITTEE/SUBCOMMITEE N/A AGENDAS _.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. OTHER INFORMATION CITY COUNCIL'OS YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Page 1 of 1 City Council's Youth Advisory Committee Members January 24,2017 Thirteen(13)primary members and thirteen(13)alternate members with terms to 9/29/17. (Note: Calallen and Coles High Schools did not submit recommendations and Carroll High School only submitted a name for a primary member. The principals from the respective high schools have made the following recommendations for ratification by the City Council.) Justine Borchard CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 Calallen High School Primary Kyle Hill CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 Calallen High School Alternate Ernest Buitron,II CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 Carroll High School Alternate Leslie Salomon CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 Carroll High School Primary Vacant CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Vacant 9/29/2015 Coles High School Alternate Vacant CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Vacant 9/29/2015 Coles High School Primary Benjamin Godinez CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 3 1 9/29/2015 Collegiate High School Alternate Andrea Hernandez CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 Collegiate High School Primary Caroline Ellis CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 Flour Bluff High School Primary Carl Hartwick CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 Flour Bluff High School Alternate Mary Hubert CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 Incarnate Word Academy Primary Vacant CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Vacant 9/29/2015 Incarnate Word Academy Alternate Nicholas Garza CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 John Paul II High School Primary Olivia Hinojosa CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 John Paul II High School Alternate Olivia Noble CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 King High School Primary Keith Roperes CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 King High School Alternate Kaitilyn Hamling CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 Miller High School Primary Krishna Patel CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 Miller High School Alternate Carlos Olvera CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 Moody High School Alternate Kyla Vina CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 Moody High School Primary Alisha Beirne CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 Ray High School Alternate Joshua Ferrell CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 Ray High School Primary Juan Fuentes CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 Tuloso-Midway High School Primary Victoria Thomas CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 Tuloso-Midway High School Alternate Francisca Ricardo CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 West Oso High School Alternate Eric Silguero CITY COUNCIL'S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Not seeking reappointment District 1 1 9/29/2015 West Oso High School Primary City Council's Youth Advisory Committee Applicants January 24, 2017 Name Board Applying For I Hannah Mayo City Council's Youth Advisory Committee District 5 Mary Carroll High School 12 Primary Hector Piris City Council's Youth Advisory Committee District 3 Collegiate High School 11 Primary Jailene Robledo City Council's Youth Advisory Committee District 3 Collegiate High School 11 Alternate Noah Earley City Council's Youth Advisory Committee District 5 Flour Bluff High School 11 Primary Marina Langford City Council's Youth Advisory Committee District 4 Flour Bluff High School 11 Alternate Amille Bottom City Council's Youth Advisory Committee District 4 Incarnate Word Academy 11 Primary Ashley Montgomery City Council's Youth Advisory Committee District 5 Incarnate Word Academy 11 Alternate Christian McAllister City Council's Youth Advisory Committee District 5 John Paul II High School 11 Primary Christina Okoniewski City Council's Youth Advisory Committee District 5 John Paul II High School 12 Alternate Akash Maheshwari City Council's Youth Advisory Committee District 4 King High School 11 Primary Mark Infante City Council's Youth Advisory Committee District 5 King High School 12 Alternate Justine Wade City Council's Youth Advisory Committee District 1 Miller High School 11 Primary Felipe Alvarez City Council's Youth Advisory Committee District 5 Miller High School 11 Alternate Monique Martinez City Council's Youth Advisory Committee District 2 Moody High School 11 Primary Kim Cornejo City Council's Youth Advisory Committee District 5 Moody High School 12 Alternate Katie Gasiorowski City Council's Youth Advisory Committee District 4 Ray High School 11 Primary Tyler Johnson City Council's Youth Advisory Committee District 4 Ray High School 11 Alternate Jaime Castillo City Council's Youth Advisory Committee District 1 Tuloso-Midway High School 11 Primary Jaclyn Cavazos City Council's Youth Advisory Committee District 1 Tuloso-Midway High School 12 Alternate Creighton Avery City Council's Youth Advisory Committee District 3 West Oso High School 11 Primary Myranda Flores City Council's Youth Advisory Committee District 3 West Oso High School 12 Alternate City Council's Youth Advisory Committee WHY SHOULD APPLY?YOU APPLICATION To be considered for the City Council's Youth Advisory You - difference in Committee (CCYAC) this application must be completed your community and returned to: City of Corpus Christi Have - voice in addressing City Secretary's Office youth •ur community 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Becomeof resources •r youth Important: You must currently be a student in grades ° through 12, as well as a current resident of Corpus Ci rest Be involved • g oTexas in order to apply for participation in the City Council s tions for youth challenges Youth Advisory Committee. Your application will be considered for any vacancy on the committee. You may ' concerns update your application at any time Be a leaderyour • Have a voice in supporting PERSONAL INFORMATION (Please type or print legibly) programs an. Name ' the youthCorpus Name I prefer to be called: _ TA.Al1V\a 16yy\,2 M Current Grade LevelHOW ELSE CAN _ School `" Kfin of) I GET • Date of Birth _ Sex (M/F) Name of Parents)/Guardion(s) NV,S V\6LQD Our meetings are open and Ik Lbv U volunteers are always wel- come for , - Home Address City CjXVj As Nn yck� Zip— Ho me ipHome Phone Number Cell Phone Number+ Circle preferred number for contact E-mail Address: .; ORGANIZATIONS. ACTIVITIES. INTERESTS & COMMUNITY List up to four school, volunteer, religious, social, athletic, community, or special activities which you have participated. 1. 6p.JAea dbk `t 1('a"U Ua. Nlt,,,SaR- x 1JMa"Man-o- 2. 13-`b 4v She✓ `l5 3. wnA- d, s AVAILABILITY What time commitments do you have that might affect your full participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? 5 GENERAL INFORMATION 1. If you could make a difference for youth in your community, what would you do and how would you do it? ,laa \n S Gtin.r� CaA&S 6 a aNte� s 5 iD sez k3s v 3ti• I 60-0 C.b`�rvr► N Un a,4e 2. What do you consider to be the major concerns of youth throughout this community? -�Yy�PNtlt� 4 0AJA rnr, rah `vim (��n+� �� o� �r�(. [�� rAW,vn -Cy✓ k�l - (T� k,.1 I\VtiS ACO k Temp f Pi,Ct,rcca.v�r,'c ca„ 3. Why do you want to participate in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? .�L 1 I fi��r �- �•�sr.�r ss a� Co��e c Gin WIN - o- w REFERENCES (OPTIONAL) To help us know you better, you may submit up to two (2) references from adults who know you well. These letters of reference must be mailed separately and directly to the address provided on this application form. Applicants should provide an addressed, stamped envelope to their refer- ences for mailing. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL Have your parents complete the Parent/Guardian Approval Form ( see Below ) and turn the com- peted form in with your application. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL FORM Name of Applicant (Please print): _JAMul) For and in consideration of participation in the Corpus Christi (3ty Council Youth Advisory Committee, the un- dersigned parent or legal guardian for and on behalf of the above named student, his or her heirs, executors, and assigns, does hereby release, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi, and any committee sponsors or advisors,their agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, damages, personal injury, including death and property damage resulting directly or indirectly from the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee, including the planning, organization and presentation of projects as well as transportation to and from all committee activities, The undersigned parent or legal guardian consents to the City of Corpus Christi, its agents, officers and employees to transport or provide transportation whether by public bus service, private or commercial automobile or other appropriate vehicle for the above named student to and from all program activities. All still and video photography becomes the property of the City of Corpus Christi and the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. The undersigned parent or legal guardian understands that the above named student is committed to and required to attend monthly Youth Committee meetings and sponsored activities. _ t;-) � Sicfiature of Parent Guardian Date l �ti 2A lite Sigrinture of Applicant Date NOTE: All information on this application is public information pursuant to the provisions of the Public Information Act. City Council's Youth Advisory Committee APPLY?WHY SHOULD YOU APPLICATION To be considered for the City Council's Youth Advisory You - - - difference in Committee (CCYAC) this application must be completed your community and returned to City of Corpus Christi voiceHave a addressing City Secretary's Office Youth •ur community 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Become e of existing resources 'r youth i Important: You must currently be a student in grades 9 through 12, as Well as a current resident of Corpus Christi, Be involved in finding + Texas in order to apply for participation in the City Council's challenges Youth Advisory Committee. Your application will be tions • youth considered for any vacancy on the committee. You may + concerns update your application at any time leaderBe a + community EERSONAL INFORMATION (Please type or print legibly) voiceHave a ••. • programs and services affect- Name k�,C- ' the youthCorpus Name I prefer to be called: CITU r Current Grade Level HOW A Schao .. I GET INVOLVED? Date of Birth Sex (M/F) Name of Porent(s)/Guardian(s) Our - + open and r �� t x'15 • - - for CCYAC projects. Home Address Cit&Qrpo5� C)r ti zip_ — — Home Phone Numbgr —'1 Cell Phone Number Circle preferred number for contact yr _ `"�` E-mall Address. R A I ATi N A IVITI . N RE �N1,44 NITY List up to Four school, volunteer, religious, social, athletic, community, or specicl act livres which you ave participated. �. C) 2. r 3.�d GG v-,, k h- ,. VS n r';5� — d. AVAILABILITY What time commitments do you have that might affect your Full participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? r u 6,011 .S ge4 of �a W� b;a wok Iasi . f 1 o, S coQ.ld he C) I� e clCAssGS. GENERAL INFORMATION }. If you could make a difference For youth in your community, what would you do and how would you do it? LA-1C)U ti91 L) C ka\,1E, 0, m esti n VJ1 1 SCh a rac1P. coco T rvfea 2. What do you consider to be the major concerns of youth throughout this community? e el w-)a11 fi-ew), 3. Why do you want to participate in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? I La o'n k k able �o K6 P AY) rr\ voice . -a: A �NoLo � r n e. w � S ��� c� ari d S �u►�� -�a REFERENCES (OPTIONAL) To help us know you better, you may submit up to two (2) references from adults who know you well. These letters of reference must be mailed seporateiy and directly to the address provided on this application form. Applicants should provide an addressed, stamped envelope to their refer- ences for mailing. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL Have your parents complete the Parent/Guardian Approval Form ( see below ) and turn the com- peted form in with your application. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL FORM Name of Applicant (Please print); O eG40 r- P i r 1 S For and in consideration of participation in the Corpus Christi City Council Youth Advisory Committee, the un- dersigned parent or legal guardian for and on behalf of the above named student, his or her heirs, executors, and assigns, does hereby release, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi, and any committee sponsors or advisors, their agents, officers, and employees from any and at[ claims, damages, personal injury, including death and property damage resulting directly or indirectly from the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee, including the planning, organization and presentation of projects as well as transportation to and from all committee activities. The undersigned parent or legal guardian consents to the City of Corpus Christi, its agents, officers and employees to transport or provide transportation whether by public bus service, private or commercial automobile or other appropriate vehicle for the above named student to and from all program activities. All still and video photography becomes the property of the City of Corpus Christi and the City Council's Youth Advisory Commitiee The undersigned parent or legal guardian understands that the above named student is committed to and required to attend monthly Youth Committee meetings and sponsored activities. tigil' ature of Parent/Guardian Date } Signature of Applicant Date NOTE: All information on this application is public information pursuant to the provisions of the Public Information Act City Council's Youth Advisory Committee APPLY?WHY SHOULD YOU APPLICATION To be considered for the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee(CCYAC)this application must be completed and returned to: Rave a voice in acldressinq City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi,Texas 78401 Important You must currently be a student in grades 8 through 12, as well as a current resident of Corpus Christi, Texas in order to apply for participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. Your application will be tions for youth ch0enges considered for any vacancy on the committee.You may and concerris update your application at any time PM-ONAL INFORM TON (Please type or print legibly) Name--,-X& ir,2 thoyouth in Corpus Christi Name I prefer to be called: Current Grade Level School ('X I(t'C-►Q,C� iC�Y\ �•r ��r)7-�k HOW ELSE CAN :1 I GET INVOLVED? Date of Birth_ y Sex Name of Parents)/Guardion(s) Yl';ti C r .i • FI v6untoers are Vie!- 7 r�L Nome Address City UY cs-rs r.h Zip Home Phone Number Cell Phone Numb - Circle preferred number for contact E-mail Address:. _ ORGANIZATIONS.ACfIVITIES__INJERESTS &CQMMUNITY List up to four school, volunteer, religious, social, athletic, community, or special activities which you have participated. I. .+V i' e_Vx c(1!, n4 -i !- (,-?AVP/(n6 Y' ,i't- 44%s Au n mN, r, kt S r 2. Cid I RF, f 6"Lt,1 —VO)x[ A' rk i t 3. rp S rr Ntk b a� C'c71�1 r� e RjaVA Ec h cot AMILABILITY What time commitments do you have that might affect your full participation in the City Council's Youth Adviso-y_ Committee? sr(ioia� tk6,VIfier I{):1� �r cQc tSl. irl Y �i 1` J GENERAL INFORMATION 1. If you could make a difference for youth in your community, what would you do and how would you do it? t� acs h btu,r 1h�,�,�1 S `1�,� h�t r���► LI -e. cl -1-7) Ag nods I � L�lll.S C'e! tfl"1 ' ` U Y ti nil cii ,, J -L,PPA) wj`(r f Ph* Y'P5 O b5f> - Q Ii Cit z n,5s . 2. What doyou consider to be the major concerns of youth throughout this community? COU 1� io c,c'nv�n s - i,5 -Aw-y) CYT r� � cu and Lick o�- TnyAi1 A' s:Mir+YC', -raj or6 -,&s su-Ppuf-i 3.Why do you want to participate in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? �7. rbJ l o ' Or tA1a c1 c� j���rile.ci d� REFERENCES (OPTIONALI To help us know you better, you may submit up to two (2) references from adults who know you well.These letters of reference must be mailed separately and directly to the address provided on this application form.Applicants should provide an addressed, stamped envelope to their refer- ences for mailing. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPR= Have your parents complete the Parent/Guardian Approval Form ( see below) and turn the com- peted form in with your application. PARENTIGUARDIAN APPROVAL FORM Name of Applicant(Please print): For and in consideration of participation in the Corpus Christi City Council Youth Advisory Committee,the un- dersigned parent or legal guardian for and on behalf of the above named student,his or her heirs,executors, and assigns, does hereby release, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi,and any committee sponsors or advisors,their agents,officers, and employees from any and all daims,damages, personal injury, including death and property damage resulting directly or indirectly from the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee, including the planning,organization and presentation of projects as well as transportation to and from all committee adivities. The undersigned parent or legal guardian consents to the City of Corpus Christi, its agents,officers and employees to transport or provide transportation whether by public bus service,private or commercial automobile or other appropriate vehicle for the above named student to and from all program activities. All still and video photography becomes the property of the City of Corpus Christi and the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. The undersigned parent or legal guardian understands that the above named student is committed to and required to attend monthly Youth Committee meetings and sponsored activities. ignature of Parent uardian Me Si nature of Applic6nt ate NOTE: All information an this application is public information pursuant to the provisions of the Public Information Act. WHY SHOULD YOU APPLY? You can make a difference in your community Have a voice in addressing youth issues in your community Become aware of existing resources for youth Be involved in finding solu- tions for youth challenges and concerns Be a leader in your community Have a voice in supporting programs and services affect- ing the youth in Corpus Christi HOW ELSE CAN I GET INVOLVED? Our meetings are open and volunteers ire always wel- come for CCYAC orojects. • ICity Council's Youth Advisory Committee API}LIGATION To be considered for the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee (CCYAC) this application must be completed and returned to: City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 In;portant. You must currently be a student in grades 9 through 12 as well as a current resident of Corpus Christi, Texas In order to apply for participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. Your application will be considered for any vacancy on the committee. You may update your application at any time PERSONAL INFORMATION (Please type or print legibly) Name r L j,, t Name I prefer to be called: IUtcJ . Current Grade Level School�+,�, ,.t r,:r.._. 4 Iet,r _o Date of Birth Sex (M/F)_ Name of Parent(s)/Guardian(s) 11n{,+, .�,� Q i:LS Home Address City 1=orPl. S (Ap:,r., TX Home Phone Number , ell Phone Number Circ e Zip e• num •er for contact E-mail Address ORGANIZATIONS, ACTIVITIES. INTERESTS & COMMUNITY List up to four school, volunteer, religious; social; athletic. community, or special activities which you have participated, -- - - - 1. r"-.D,c)— ivkt, CL4o ic,5 2. DI—j- ns,, Ar, P i.2. -y' 3. F )J L 1/?,14 IL; 5 4. 1::1i6..,,(' ;fl &w.6 I-le:4, .;11 Ael t)Sor - 80r, AVAILABILITY What time commitments do you have that might affect your hill participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? 1- !� 12-si, Dike, � r', fi R � ,�1►" . L4� � wb 13 FS l,,.nf, f .I In ,b -k, 1._ a Zi4,,Gr.y i,,e, A . GENERAL INFORMATION 1. If you could make a difference for youth in your community, what would you do and how would you do it? tJaw.,°,1), tdor6-PG.14.L5 -t,12 f P1,E.r'��.,� — ^ CSG �.1=i4,46 ALV" �iei ;r, ft,.P,. G,'braedd ©P "-Lc-;1, {r�.11y4i T�.,,, ;,� i a cc 5 .(0 l�PSG(P1'0 . L 2. What do you consider to be the major concerns of youth throughout this community? be./1/ i u A le, >. 4, ,� jf r ►'Lr �tt ,?i Grp - le, (J61.1 e,ev,./'3 (,,1. rrr^ 1.IL e,1: v-,..:Ar'e,d. I)4.('/.1:.'ir. G. �•.ht,.. «� ter; In, 1' -6 ,� . .--grotfrY 3. Why do you want to participate in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? ‘,/ 4'.0 pa ( r pa }fe 1 i'[ - ' 1,ti Yr*��. f, (� . - Go lfl. vv..; ,11 /:1 .Je 4 J,( - rhG.-i i I t� jG F)4 Vrt 41, o= -ems. 5O,��,,,'-L LI " �♦ REFERENCES (OPTIONAL). To help us know you better. you may submit up to two (2) references from adults who know you - well. These letters of reference must be mailed separately and directly to the address provided on this application form. Applicants should provide an addressed, stamped envelope to their refer- ences for mailing. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL Have your parents complete the Parent/Guardian Approval Form ( see below) and turn the com- peted form in with your application. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL FORM Name of Applicant (Please print). (0or..,l,. r,�IrPr'i For and in consideration of participation in the Corpus Christi City Council Youth Advisory Committee, the un- dersigned parent or legal guardian for and on behalf of the above named student, his or her heirs, executors, and assigns, does hereby release, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi; and any committee sponsors or advisors, their agents; officers, and employees from any and all claims, damages, personal injury, including death and property damage resulting directly or indirectly from the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee, including the planning, organization and presentation of projects as well as transportation to and From all committee activities. The undersigned parent or legal guardian consents to the City of Corpus Christi, its agents, officers and employees to transport or provide transportation whether by public bus service, private or commercial automobile or other appropriate vehicle for the above named student to and from all program activities, All still and video photography becomes the property of the City of Corpus Christi and the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. The undersigned parent or legal guardian understands that the above named student is committed to and required to attend monthly Youth Committee meetings and sponsored activities. 'gnature of Parent Guardian Date Date NOTE; All information on tills application is public information pursuant to the provisions of the Public Information Act. You can make a difference in your community Have a vote in addressing youth issues in your community Become aware of existing resources for youth Be involved in finding solu- tions for youth challenges and concerns Have a voice in supporting programs and services affect- ing the youth in Corpus Christi HOW ELSE CAN I GET INVOLVED? Our meetings are open and volunteers are always wel- come for CCYAC projects. City Council's Youth Advisory Committee N - To be considered for the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee (CCYAC) this application must be completed and returned to: City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Important: You must currently be a student in grades 9 through 12, as well as a current resident of Corpus Christi, Texas in order to apply for participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. Your application will be considered for any vacancy on the committee. You may update your application at any time PERSONAL INFORMATION (Please type or print legibly) Name Maitrifl(k LetVIDOIWCI Name !prefer to be called: rV\n.r I (In Current Orad School T- (.sort- }Jtyr..] 1 •i 1 • (.! Sex (M/F) Date of Birth Name of parents)/Guardian(s) Y I';Ti'lr1C? Lori f z vel Home Address City { Wept i. Zip Home Phone Number Cell Phone Number (_ Circle preferred number for contact E-mail Address: ORGANIZATIONS. ACTIVITIES. INTERESTS & COMMUNITY List up to four school, volunteer, religious, social, athletic, community, or special activities which you have participated. _ I. FI hrfMuf Thep S drool to %Al (\(-.-T-e.Ckin. 2. Dr i cc I I C h i wi r e r1's Itnsp-ra l- j ?r'ri vii;:1.-1-ee.e' 9v1ti N/t 3. Un i Ve Vit' I rri--P 4. Amo.Vl(cin J►C�,Y. �--DSI' .u�%cC '-'onf. ,' �Clv AVAILABILITY What time commitments do you have that might affect your full participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? I Lave r -anis. co1'i -- cif- wo U inn , itl1 Gamily cm t-)ry 1-1-15 ;-,c i'4S ACIv'r (c, on_m i-r?ree GENERAL INFORMATION L If you could make a difference for youth in your community, what would you do and how would you do it? (U rfati_ed U1 dgRtfe..n(L-likw tint? "i t i''(1u. C nowkon �I YOts ; -1 Y1. s f) i �fl r r . l ti3PY1CUt} ��(.�_ Ay\ h, 1('(lp nvino,.), ( pif 1,0 til t ci spc4. I -A 1 ft - - •m(A ) crk c-kfrelvola>, r1fi- EciO N. l‘r\n r►nr1'(e (x(Y' c -se -,'i h�� r 2. What do you consider to be the major concerns of youth throughout this community? .W ftt Map( Con(' e r (.s LID u*h t(D Uc ho .--r " "5- s CUY'nYl'tUf11t lta •-ik\CL-+ k 1 ct are 4vb,t'Y\. i t1 1-k .Q ) r Com mon )* t.CIC;', I SUC S (:fir-ri um -r !twat ve rl (V (1 G }ofvictra l 3. Why do you want to participate in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? 1 woo7lrl 1 . tD p,1pnte\(0lJtVt MviSn(L,� j9-C'..c f US -c. 1 i. no vi 10,L' Cl l - e. e.)'(. 1r1 Pinf (()1'YYi1J11 NIA r.- M0 )2_:tt&;r. REFERENCES (OPTIONAL} To help us know you better, you may submit up to two (2) references From adults who know you well.. These letters of reference mustbe mailed separately and directLy.to theaddress provided on this application form. Applicants should provide an addressed, stamped envelope to their refer- ences for mailing. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL Have your parents complete the Parent/Guardian Approval Form ( see below ) and turn the com- peted form in with your application. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL FORM Name of Applicant (Please print): i `r 1Q1(La .:T id For and in consideration of participation in the Corpus Christity Council Youth Advisory Committee, the un- dersigned parent or legal guardian for and on behalf of the above named student, his or her heirs, executors, and assigns, does hereby release, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi, and any committee sponsors or advisors, their agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, damages, personal injury, including death and property damage resulting directly or indirectly from the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee, including the planning, organization and presentation of projects as well as transportation to and from all committee activities. The undersigned parent or legal guardian consents to the City of Corpus Christi, its agents, officers and employees to transport or provide transportation whether by public bus service, private or commercial automobile or other appropriate vehicle for the above named student to and from all program activities. All still and video photography becomes the property of the City of Corpus Christi and the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. The undersigned parent or legal g+iardian understands that the above named student is committed to and required to attend monthly Youth Committee meetings and sponsored activities. S,tgnature of Pdent/Guardian Date • lfc Signature of App 12 -1 --Ito Date NOTE: AH information on this application is public information pursuant to the provisions of the Public Information Act. WHY SHOULD YOU APPLY? YO can make a difference in your community .• r.- I -lave a voice in addressing youth issues in your community Become aware of existing resources for youth . Be involved in finding .solu- tions for youth challenges and concerns Be a leader in your community Have a voice in supporting programs and services affect- ing the youth in Corpus Christi HOW ELSE CAN 1 GET INVOLVED? Our meetings are open and volunteers are always wel- come for CCYAC projects. City Council's Youth Advisory Committee APPLICATION To be considered for the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee (CCYAC) this application must be completed and returned to: City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Important: You must currently be a student in grades 9 through 12, as well as a current resident of Corpus Christi, Texas in order to apply for participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. Your application will be considered for any vacancy on the committee. You may update your application at any time PERSQfAL INFORMATION (Please type or print legibly) Narne }Lt � '- AlitOrn Name I prefer to be called: AV A Current Grade Level school SY1{arb,'iL - V ! r cy1 Date of Birth _ Sex (M/F)� Name of Parents)/Guardian(s) 1-~ ��►( k� �f .'II\ 06k1NY\ (WA SktvYik(11Q 3 c).\i o'1v L Home Address CityCiifrtVt, 01141i Home Phone Number Cell Phone NumbedL Zip, Circle preferred number For contact E-mail Address: ORGANIZATIONS. ACTIVITIES. INTERESTS & COMMUNITY List up to four school, volunteer, religious, social, athletic, community, or special activities which you have participated. 1. N tlIfi- (�\i\ k\ -'i ti 0 \f• 2..CJ(1\VI C.1i i,�e(�1 (* \ ncrR ,nrA\-t� vwfcv htiA IVM i-eo I\ ov ( 3. 1 AC .\ ()1rR, P\CMu frft, ti,SJ \ 4. (" (1001) V. '1 a-3 \te. ill \ol) (.0 \nr m 1-bq A f vWi ' . V11Y\ Ov1 fArf rt'r Ak\k I,-,110Gi 'nUV\ oN\u Y re c.\ Eu a_ti 1-vgn, , vt, AVAILABILITY What time commitments do you have that might affect your full participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? 1\lit GENERAL INFORMATION 1. If you could make a difference for youth in your community, what would you do and how would you do it? -3 4\0\1.. , u,tsir, Q ,M11/4•1 AV\Q 70,),\ ( \hopui C,lVI A\ -S v,t,\\) vey .i)r T. r\(\ dti TUv �'I11e Y,kl(k s 0- +R;Or 1V'JU. 1 \J 3\\\c\ occi by bi k'. .V(',1ll1,04A00r.S ,>,NVtie 'M y\ [-‘)".\‘\ lern"rlr, k mr).C\V-'" -iMI i- (>ti<,tJ\4 V (V .t U i v�.r �a N , .r NAA( `Ahh ► u1L11 ?�0..\f‘A v\tt. oory kr\ ,Ct,l-tljO111nkCt)V1\.i1i\G, r w Ul' C& Ov( rtNA, \ 1 Yl(A v�tJV,1(1 (ir \j),W 2. What do you consider to be the major concerns of youth throughout this community? A (y (i.3tJ tjJ\J)C Vvl \)twAAv, \),()\1\0•\A- �'ll�i.t ukt'A 01,0,: f 1 i-f%ti ll[j.'i V 1UJ, }\(1 .' IV t.(O 11\ V V 1. \A! ('1+A' S } r. y` i` (1 J i'A).S. ,�t.Cil(r<< i,T.1 v e 1 s Ifie?„\'` 4 t)u ,C,\1410,1 0110N Y1G11YL(`' t f TV\ i ,t>tiM .\J\ -. 'r �vS tri[ F, vm\ iv\ - � 1u,\'t J' -Y(:\ C,.VI (1 vt ��(1C1�( ev\,`\-.e, \<GkIVI V v�.e () t, i'A A s �.�,r (\ 111 j \\ •V�e i ) V^ W Q y oN'\! u*- r. {.Vv\'\'JV v;v,,tkJ 3. Why do you want to participate in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? J V\IN - 1)(i4AiC\V1J . ►\it \VSL Cvlul (Q'\ \JtCi11.5 r i :lv;(1vk,\ Cowl( u‘i 1\-i.. >rfe.f_I?,v\-Ivo \Q\ vockY\\- %) 0r4,01 cry Ai ';c;vt.v) �T)V (14 ,') l (')11 ((\VV.5 viciv\XVi 1 V1 (/ Q;\\ c * f.i (rA 1 Y,) \ \i\ sc)1 (Mvvtivy‘'t t wi\1 ctA1t1W Ja) 1-(mA iAlA'Q VY\ S L?t \() cirfi i,VL.0 REFERENSES (OPTIONAL) To help us know you better, you may submit up to two (2) references from adults who know you well. These letters of reference must be mailed separately and directly to the address provided on this application form. Applicants should provide an addressed, stamped envelope to their refer- ences for mailing. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL Have your parents complete the Parent/Guardian Approval Form ( see below) and turn the corn- peted Form in with your application. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL FORM Name of Applicant (Please print): .4 ry i 1 1 e.' Ade, 11 tR e + r_s For and in consideration of participation in the Corpus Christi City Council Youth Advisory Committee, the un- dersigned parent or legal guardian for and on behalf of the above named student, his or her heirs, executors, and assigns, does hereby release, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi, and any committee sponsors or advisors, their agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, damages, personal injury, including death and property damage resulting directly or indirectly from the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee, including the planning, organization and presentation of projects as well as transportation to and from all committee activities. The undersigned parent or legal guardian consents to the City of Corpus Christi, its agents, officers and employees to transport or provide transportation whether by public bus service, private or commercial automobile or other appropriate vehicle For the above named student to and from all program activities. All still and video photography becomes the property of the City of Corpus Christi and the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. The undersigned parent or legal guardian understands that the above named student is committed to and required to attend monthly Youth Committee meetings and sponsored activities. Signaturcrof Parent/Guardian Date /.'(, .Ce he;./ViiiD Signature of Applicant Date NOTE: All information on this application is public information pursuant to the provisions of the Public Information Act. WHY SHOULD YOU APPLY? You an r1.'ake dr-trence;i your curl' °rriur it;y Have a voice in addrt.':s.:s`: ick youth issues in your carrimui71ry Become aware of resources for you -h Be involved in finding. rylu- tions for youth chall ruie and concerns Be a leader in your community Have a voice in supporting programs and services affect- ing the youth in Corpus Christi HOW ELSE CAN I GET INVOLVED? Our meetings are open and volunteers are always wel- come for CCYAC projects. NI! 4r< A. City Council's Youth Advisory Committee APPLICATION To be considered for the City Council's Yuth Adv sory Committee (CCYAC) this application m..s: be completed and ret:jrned to. City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Irnoo tF.11l. YJU . Ji : e •1 b�studentgrades 9 .. v. a 7 .ifs mil in througi. 12, as vii-.41 as G curi.ent tient cf Corpus Christ. e xe.. in u,cl . to apcly fo. participation in t ae City Council S YoL.:hAGS.'spry CD `lliiLt Your apoiicat;o will kae consic;eral I„ a ly vr.rancy on the committee. You may update you' ap; licat on at any time PERSONAL INFORMATION (Please type or print legibly) NameUNr\Y-)13 Name I prefer to be called: Current Grade Level School Date of Birth :J Sex (M/F) Narne of Parerd(s)/Guardian(s) l'\ff 11)\(;t t:i i Home Address Mcolciqh., City I;l ,`�{��h Zip Home Phone Number Cell Phone Number Circle preferred number for contact E-mail Address: _ , ORGANIZATIONS. ACTIVITIES. INTERESTS & COMMUNITY List up to Four school, volun`eer, religioLs, socia!, athletic, community, or special activ ties whic- you have participated. i. nC r,;,,c,nc:,\? 1!\',";r(7), Acc,riuof 11 1 ! ((\rior,nit lcU'r 2. U\rl (.0 \fl (-A\ \ IN\Q;t; ",l f i �:Ia 41' `IL(- ; `l?C;Ch ) /ji1 f Ci g CI f Ar 3. :C�11(r-ti; iti{1C .i\ t A-Ccic:iiLim e 1 C'y)c c �11 t .. NI c*-Vk r (-,A1 \-e\ } .? AVAILABILITY What time commitments do you have that might affect your full participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Comnrnittttee?` 0 /� r� r ^� ! y� '\_, \1}Id i k Iris l 4. 1. 1 i c i i 1 C ice'` i id 1 `! I if Pell GENERAL INFORMATION 1. If you could make a difference for youth in your community, what would you do and how would you dolit? ii \ 1 i\�f� i A \ ttr i� i� ;'r 11 ,i L fit! 1, i }r Q.4 Ci (a;.) o\!-\ o C' u 1 ck ,r Cl1 I ,iii' .1+\ (1_)% e 1 (!-f C' } (-7: .1%c 1 , . \/\\;& \ t --c;,lt',v' « -Wv (c.fi(VI'1 L,ln N1 \ k\\r\c' , .\)\\-\\I r " J 2. What do you consider to be the major concerns of youth throughout this community? f �l� i7 � (' ‘\(\i' � \ , -Ake) i� � ��i' \ 1�n��' ! � � J .� 1-14 `� X,s-c C f c., t -k-7-J�.a ncc G1 C,,( r4 col LjCc:-11 cam. \,() Vx. (I\( ,1 i-cl, G1r�c-� 3. Why do you want to participate in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? 0.\\031.\ ; ox:SL \A 1n \ c.cA Cc- ,lent e P� (cAvN C. 1\\ \- ;\.kc:.\/-\ J 36r\^/L\ REF=ERENCES (OP T IONtAU To help us know you better, you may s'ubmi:. up to two (2] references from adults who know you well. These letters of reference must be rnci ed separately and directly to the address provided on this application form. Applican=s should provide an addressed, stamped envelope to their refer- ences for mailing. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL Have your parents complete the Parent/Guardian Approval Forrn ( see below ) and turn the com- peted form in with your applica`ion. PARENT /GUARDIAN APPROVAL. FORM Name of Appl!tant (Please print) 41Sr\1C; l; For and in consideration of participation in the Corpus City Council Youth Aldvisory Committee, the un- dersigned parent or legal guardian for and on behalf of the above named student, his or her hears, executors, and assigns, doe; hereby release, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi, and any committee sponsors or advisors, their agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, damages, personal injury, including death and properly damage resulting directly or indirectly from the City Councils Youth Advisory Committee, including the planning. organization and presentation of projects as well as transportation to and from all committee act'vities. The undersigned parent or legal guardian consents to the City of Corpus Christi, its agents officers and employees to transport or provide transportation whether by public bus service, private or commercial automobile or other appropriate vehicle for the above named student to and from all program activities. All still and video photography becomes the property of the City of Corpus Christi and the City Council's Youth Advisory Commitee. The undersigned parent or legal guardian understands that the above named student is committed to and required to attend monthly Youth Committee meetings and sponsored activities Signature of Patent/Guardian Date 1 r r Signature a` -A piicant % Date NOTE: All information on this application is publi: information pursuant to the provisions of the Public Information Act. WHY SHOULD YOU APPLY? You can make a difference in your community Have a voice in addressing youth issues in your community Become aware of existing resources for youth Be involved in finding solu- tions for youth challenges and concerns Be a leader in your community Have a voice in supporting programs and services affect- ing the youth in Corpus Christi HOW ELSE I GET I NVO Our meetings are open and volunteers are always well come for CCYAC pr " ts. City Cou cis YoLfh Advisory Committee APPLICATION Con -r;-•" 0 ✓� i"I np ii�n:f r' it : he ccnF , et,e:i a lcf re!7 s City of Corpus Christi CitySecretary's Office 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 PERSONA! INFORmATi01.1 t,i_ - Cr p -int Nomer..-S►4. N came coiled Current Grade Le iei Scf;cyni��. Dote of Birr'ri A - e.. !tyt+, `} RDL Home Address City -• 7 f A IE`ome Phone Numbs Cee; Phone Number Lip - . Circle preferred number for contact E -moil Address: & co '1:1 `/f Jr,07" List ' :Si 'J� to Four �Ct CGI, V':ltJriPeefr, r�4't1'nr -� �;�or�� _y.. � �" ar;r^ r *i+ i a JS >�_...��. �i, .�. �-t-ii?::nii s S�. I tel'. /!.i .i I1 r L JPA fr 1, fr, I. P ,1lrtl'.LaaIL TY 1i+re cc'n'mr€?:Tienih do } ha ie r•}af• i"Si+ ��' v'."�, ..r t>J�! p:7-, -- fi Lid Cr_ J'�ii 5 n Y,uth Ad,riscry' C•�+rar-:ittLti, y r I f " i, G -G"- 5 .2447_.�1_L�_a _� ^Lce� ice`: � C_ L_ 5.:,_rC'�%ItAI. �, GENERAL INFORMATION 1. if you could make ci difference for youth in y,:: community whai would yzJ do and how would you do it? `_7cp�y • c ePoioie +n ii.af+Lrv15 C .11. 1., Irl-,_ j :~: �:.�r -m , r:� ,_ eti 4 _ :r�.c Cit _�r _ 4� . t �.. )'h c r.. 11.11 p ttF_'•�S_AY,?} P`n�_��' �} ert ��`�•LZ� 2. Frvhc.1 d 4'E' cort5id9r tQ 'pe rloi )' ,r+ t C i=J:J'i liii 'ug- tti ttfl': rorirnunity? L- IFS __� ._.f.L t�iJJ' .a 6__l4.:� _ _',r�, art. L! r LI :.t_.A1!.. P _L% Lr.„ Y"'.".s. �•...Yr�l �t��`�_ _4.:0 ei- �� v i7. Why do yo:J wont to participate in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? 1 !�,l�r� See rvr L;} 4v,E .tn�e help u's krc'+'i i b..e'fier, y u racy .1reTrli up is i'h' (2) reiere.nce; t -Ori} ccLits'Aino knew yo r +l�St ,i:;5.-' Ioi a �� a�7� i1 . i :St be. ..r-. 4 dir"-',:rl7 t5: e addreis ; r rr:. ai' T_ Sic SAO; .:e -j c-+= Dpe r.. 4f'c' - PAREN7GUARDIAN AcPRO'%AL _ parer:s corrplcte the. P.:rer,n r: .a! Farr,' sae below, and turn i. r? py': farm ;r >it', y_ur apr:,li.: i :n. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL FORM wr, Applicano (Nose print)',�'.��� cr crd lil cors derat{on of pa-t:ciPr'� atro1n the Corpus Chhri:>ti City CGr.Jncl `:uth Advisory Committe_ the lir.- 'W `i e pater t o' tega g. vard'G + i 1r and or: Ee'r,dlr c the above named student, hS or her eX?cuto-s. :rd aSS,ans da,;s hereby release. indemnify crd ho'd i ormlesss the City of Corpus Christi, Cnd any Committee r J. yr J or. tf e;. otic. is afrl:cr.: and £ri1r1 J Yom': l: c`fi ;;:ld CI I cicirris, darnai1es personal n:iudi-i death and property dcn_lge resulting d'r£_tl i cr indir.ecriy from the City Council's Youtn Advisory ._c.i•'n tree !ncludir,g tf e r l� r.i ;, orgarliza`io of prcie:ts C3 Well Cr, trCrir p7rtt]}kor• to and 'r' a l comm'kte-a. act:v-ties. _n 1ersigred parert lega g�:!rCran consents to the Citi c Corpu; � Christ i, c eat;, of;icers and employee-. to transport or provide tr.ansporta'or; whether by public bus service private c' ticnrre :sal w'Jtc.nc,E'le c. Other ap r:p;iote V`'�I'J;� i.: the ra +� �wr1Wd s'ude-t t''' cind fr•.)r- 4i1 ror'rcim . 7 t:Vltie: All stil and Y:deo phc•tog'apL i b cC;nos of the CiIy Of Corpi-i Christ and t:' Citi I r A r !-td /15: . r ,.. _ IJr!dersrr.ined parent o Irg'li 'ondert,tasi:k that the above fclrnea stijdertt 1� CCi!7ryrilHed and re Iu rcd 1. Clite r d rnctnth'.y s'7:7:t.dr COP ftrl,t �� _.r,SCNEJ r.. t;vitrr.s \ : (,/' „ ;,..7r J'•ui'e if Earerii/Guardia v Signature of Applicant X61..5111" Dote Dote r+; till] it E'inrri_tio ' o this app;i:ahtoli !s 7,b11. +f -in} i- pJriuc_r t +c tj4? pre /.510'15 of the PL., C1ic inform; tion Act. WHY SHOULD YOU APPLY? You can make a difference in your community Have a voice in addressing youth issues in your community Become aware of existing resources for youth Be involved in finding solu- tions for youth challenges and concerns Be a leader in your community Have a voice in supporting programs and services affect- ing the youth in Corpus Christi HOW ELSE CAN I GET INVOLVED? Our meetings are open and volunteers are always wel- come for CCYAC projects. City Council's Youth Advisory Committee APPLICATION To be considered for the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee (CCYAC) this application must be completed and returned to: City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 PERSONAL INFORMATION {Please type or print legibly) `t Name_-.. E . ft. Name I prefer to be called: Cr i Current Grade Level School . 1* 'i� . � i 4 S T1 1.1 Date of Birth , ._ Sex {M/F) Name of Parents)/Guardian{sj (' i 4 LC. ti r 1 ( VI) ntet, _e Home Address City (' C Lpm�hana_Number Zip . Cell Phone Number Circle preferred number for contact E-mail Address: ORGANIZATIONS, ACTIVITIES. INTERESTS & COMMUNITY List up to four school, volunteer, religious, social, athletic, community, or special activities which you have participated 1 `Q r {y f -re rn ( 4 jr,sir5) 2. \-4rt1-y* �.1 t of ku ry -4 717 3 '4118-Irt ' Or.; 1 11171.-15 :- «,j 'r rt ' 4 Fc. -011 I CA LI f J AVAILABILITY What time commitments do you have that might affect your full participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? v n )d ',,,1-11-N :x'f-n, J (L(c C bLA{ T 03 Li 4i, ��}�� IC. r fi i 0) L l ' hes-( kN11Qr•..,f� GENERAL INFORMATION 1 If you could make a difference for youth in your community, what would you do and how would you do it? j'X { -ON k 1r) mc, krz r L ";rzr j r r r (L_Pn / -1f14'rdI (loc.) Jc4 ���{ate �� r�o 4)1,5 .J U 3t C FC L1P U g,J- +42 e r I -X{ toAirk 2. What do you consider to be the major concerns of youth throughout this community? 0Gxl�kj --\tt'?!1S a �-rr� tr q,- eel �-� 1�� �(Y'trm ,k1 X-ir, rA rr . c �,� Ct; i Cc f `-y i k .x, L .L ;\A u_ r., +L : I44 3 Why do you want to participate in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? � h• !Y1 y i wd,,�/ i �', Ake_ CCC m, a r. F}tf (C .1:, C ..\\(‘ ,3 S (� onc2 ds -4; frtitc. efOr,l & Ir'?'.1 kogc --c he lrE1/4 kivca CuM(N 11Vr1 e r (4 lr\ 1fYlrLlU,'... n`CEJ itlCS REFERENCES (OPTIONAL) To help us know you better, you may submit up to two (2) references from adults who know you well. These letters of reference must be mailed separately and directly to the address provided on this application form. Applicants should provide an addressed, stamped envelope to their refer- ences for mailing PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL Have your parents complete the Parent/Guardian Approval Form ( see below ) and turn the com- peted form in with your application. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL FORM Name of Applicant (Please print)• I r a 64i n, r . EKnni e iiVS For and in considerotion of participation in the Corpus Christi City Council Youth Advisory Committee,. the un- dersigned parent or legal guardian for and an behalf of the above named student, his or her heirs, executors, and assigns, does hereby release, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi, and any committee sponsors or advisors, their agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, damages, personal injury, including death and property damage resulting directly or indirectly from the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee, including the planning, organization and presentation of projects as well as transportation to and from all committee activities The undersigned parent ar legal guardian consents to the City of Corpus Christi, its agents, officers and employees to transport or provide transportation whether by public bus service, private or commercial automobile or other appropriate vehicle for the above named student to and from all program activities. All still and video photography becomes the property of the City of Corpus Christi and the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. The undersigned parent ar legal guardian understands that the above named student is committed to and required to attend monthly Youth Committee meetings and sponsored activities. 6i/ ti C I i„46 ( / )1 44, Signature of Parent/GuaLciian Date &;1t vi.0 Signature of Applicant Date NOTE: All information on this application is public information pursuant to the provisions of the Public Information Act. WHY SHOULD YOU APPLY? You can make a difference in your community Have a voice in addressing youth issues in your community Become aware of existing resources for youth Be involved in finding solu- tions for youth challenges and concerns Be a leader in your community Have a voice in supporting programs and services affect- ing the youth in Corpus Christi HOW ELSE CAN I GET INVOLVED? Our meetings are open and volunteers are always wel- come for CCYAC projects. t A 5 7i City Council's Youth Advisory Committee APPLICATION To be ccr :dered for the City Council s You`h Advisory Committee (CCYAC)) this application lust be completed and returned to. City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 lrnportan- Yo_. r t cirre be a stucent Ir grade .9 through 12 as :" e as a current resident 0: Corpus Cr- 57 Texas in o-c.e- app y fcr partic,patlor In tr= Ci:y Gc.inci Youth Adv s3 -y Your be consid "ed aiy vacancy on the comm YoJ rrey update yxir apo :cat on at any time PERSONAL INFORMATION (Please type. or print legibly) Name A ka5\. N\001\eb101!0N Name I prefer to be called: A k&5\r. Current Grade Level Schon'_' -_ Date of Birth Sex (M/F) Name of Pa-ert{s)/Guard an(s) 1FA. 6...Li U. AA�,�t^Stwan Home Address. Coy Gv r ? J S Girth Zip Home Phone Number Cell Phone Number Circle preferred number for contact E-mail Address: ORGANIZATIONS ACTIVITIES INTERESTS & COMMUNITY List up t0 four school, volunteerre" g ous socar. athletic, community or special activities which you//have participated. 1.1�1� ,,K0,n Raj 6,015 10%5 [AAP -kr -PQundur ( .0144/4.'rNs ktd5 �a 12a h Cfrownun.1-1 10,44v:};t$ i G: et 2.44414r, C tmaal 5 ari Ory C r (•- 64 6.03 -y C,1 Pi'c s;d 3.6C16D 5 ►A" a416$03or fr k;'� 4P:31\ 5'hoo\ (jai' S'+vdet\{S' Cc.(.ito t'k scA•42k tttoe,ii.) 4. Core's Lf►r;5 ; Gha.m.ht r- OrUheikra Intwsoiv- AVAILABILITY What time commitments do you have that might affect you• pa-ticipation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? All(6/ k I a" ihvou .n vt‘r,00 ar.,�,v;v;e.5) T would ,r►\o - MkVA- GENERAL INFORMATION 1. If you could make a difference for youth in your community, what would you do and how would you do it? A-F4er 1. ex Petiou?,5 w Ph 150191i.g, i .ce&1-.a,3- Jt \ -k more. I+ob1� c. avJwre.ne.b5 wbov; 'flan 641\5 ani beert.55;+sn 1+1<e a SutuBt reue0; lawV4,1ni,, wa111C 4*'.o I Por\ -11-1 tab} 01(160 40) 1.141.01k. ; r ;S titnPorkar,'r 4-0 cavii62- Sort. 601e1,5 �os b�U►ti� 5w,e 1-6 e.xPPI! 53 44,7" PettiN Ian' - . h. 4.1\0410\ 4itnilq\c' i5yue.5. i3 Yo11\ \MAk Pa1m\ i'�,�iZ4 �kAir 11- +lo14%,^a \re 1\5 INOA.11►4,ty, o tetra efeku ►Ve. carat fiveAckcitiNs Jr, kse& ,N+1A. 4\-,T zfi\erlor`5 anj Q.11V1ecv. 5 yrons,r- c•/..,SQ Pr. 2 What do yoL, conside- to be the major concerns of youth throughout this community? BuUy-ali arab 011695- 10 Jrw4 0.Ca++eun+ (“co of 41,t 4osk4.. To be, b,,lliteS Aoi ' 4 -- (At c;es\ 44fft ac odale$GeAti. is so A64-cirf% OA 17ez.b.ocaz, �1-tfl�� �rtly AU,n•acy.5 on ;,,b;vISJ45 $P.ic-e44e6Ntant 61Mook an littil4.abir5 mem alyrrhs;crt, 0x4 SLIT u+aal .ki60” 5.A144,5(ewL 010 thji- n1/490., cline, IOW do ;Kat,Sa ;k ii ��,4Qi`4';s2 �law� idoltgliNtO cnilc la t.olk y deet5icat) Orb hA•-1. k fisod C3 L oN5vthe co.; Vot. S a; 15 e1/4,61,,ivwa5 i A Wtik�� �'`n.Q,� 0�'iQ i v14 0\J to . 3. Why do you want to participate in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? W aa{ ka PoP-itiifa's4, v\ fie. COY AC be kk.IS - Z 4.ceA ;k ;5 Sock. 0.r, Q ori 'narn oeaor4um4y 40 be irlikQ. voiLg of- 5o MA, kee,mi }o CowtMu+r, (.4,.4t. key .140y f.a. ()Ad ab Va'- 5 144, or L\ AAA. G:irn h► ,QO'Sik. V4 * P. 6A or tic t- ' r 5 . a' i �L.'i�r ,,4M ss0.4-e 36+,s wn irme,ekseA ck.$4:0n5l—il 0.41,v) o e Q.xPt,ri,Nilt -cie r"L. REFERENCES (OPTIONAILI To help us know you better, you may submit up to two (2) references From adults who know yo:; well. These letters of reference must be mailed separately and directly to tha address provided or this application form. Applicants should provide an addressed, stamped envelope to the'r refer- ences Far moiling. Qtec& ook -f-orl lei- r, a reto Mi\-kArir1Yton -from (Ar. &k.IN&) Pl01JIL'A. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL Have your parents complete the Parent/Guardian Approval Form ( see below) and turn the corn- peted form in with your application. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL. FORM Name of Applicant (Please. print): kF S tF- N\. A( -r SIS-{ { ,sic -f ( For and in consideration of participation in the Corpus Christi City Council Youth Advisory Committee, the un- dersigned parent o.- legal guardian For and on behalf of the above named student, his or her heirs, executors, awl assigns, does hereby release. indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi and any committee sponsors or advisorstheir agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, damages, personal injury: including death and properly damage resulting directly or indirectly from the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee, including the planning: organization and presentation of projects as well as transportation to and From all committee activities The undersigned parent or legal guardian consents to the City of Corpus Christi, its agents, officers and employees to transport or provide transportation whether by public bus service, private or commercial autombbile or other appropriate vehicle for the above named student to and from all program activities. All st 11 and video photography becomes the property of the City of Corpus Christ and the City Council s Youth Advisory Co-nmittee. The undersigned parent or legal guard an understands t,a; the above named student is committed to and required to attend monthly Yout'1 Committee meet;.ngs ar.d sponsored activities. (..ft�� ^~ Signature of Parent/Guardian Dat 04,Aal Signature of Applicant /// Daf'e e,CA, 2., Cor A-\\! a Cf.( 6f 11 CG r tM NOTE: All information on this application is p.•btic informat'on purs:iani to t o provisions of the Fublic Information Act RA. .+-C) DU -NP- Q c e { 41A;oti5 WHY SHOULD YOU APPLY? You can make a difference in your community Have a voice in addressing youth issues in your community Become aware of existing resources for youth Be involved in finding solu- tions for youth challenges and concerns Be a leader in your community Have a voice in supporting programs and services affect- ing the youth in Corpus Christi HOW ELSE CAN 1 GET INVOLVED? Our meetings are open and volunteers are always wel- come for CCYAC projects. .r .04S. 1 Ira k..— City Council's Youth Advisory Committee APPLICATION To be considered for the City Council s Youth Advisory Committee (CCYAC.' this application must be completed and returned to. City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 :mport_rit Yo mast current y be a stuoent in grades g throuan ? as v,e'i as a cure ;t resident c' Corpus Texas in order to app y for participation in the s Ycutn Adv so-/ Co nm t-ee Your applicat on v. I oe considered fog any vacancy on the corr m:tee i nay update yo...r. appl °Eno, at any time PERSONAL INFORMATION (Pleasej[type or print legibly) Name _j4r r-ik Name I prefer to be called: MQr-1 Current Grade Level Schon ,t Date of Birth - Sex (M/F)_ Name of Parents)/Guard'ar,fs) I'c 1 arc( tak.9 - r~k Home Address City a riS ns�Zip Home Phone Number mber _ Circle preferred number for contact E-mail Address: _ ORGANIZATIONS ACTIVITIES. IN-ERESrS & COMMUNITY L's' up to four school, volunteer, religious social, athletic, community or special act'vities which you have participated. 1. . ,l &r, i 04%,1 2. At G c Dad -441 1,60no vs La 3. 5fittat Da341C TtArn(PI,61* P' 4k) 4. Supti i h is 54L I Aryl 1' Caw, u' AVAILABILITY What time commitments do you have that might affect yo. , full participation in the City Councils Youth Advisory Committee? kIo i►rC eoirmihis--•4 1441 AI prize qt on. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. If you could make a difference for youth in your community, what would you do and how would you do it? 14 y0a ( be +o, Sl,a w 4't youft 4G,. be.4 'i3 eC have' 4 1:7o1i terk'a-z rn Ordge KIM° wok. sMAfth w4),Avi / r� -Ho's 1 tatlr,� �, ,4.6 +�+„ til f� c�J Ates ty V l 54r tbb 71& 19(41...41-7✓ d �`�OC�3i _Oh Ota AtmahlQ• 4e b call 2. What do you consider to be the major concerns of youth throughout this community'? ,4( I% 4 prI4Um. m* sn con 1- prebu-rte 44,1's covirrwhali eK.t! �sciv 4P-01 416,444 ( or yo'/. *Th 1.5 rnriv..0ftilli a, So Verdi & pfobt . off' e.dxcQf'o» ;net/411y. 3.Whydo you want�to participate in the CitynCouncil's Youth Advisory Committee? ''S !S T& Sr tw Tom/ 1Y'+L t mat 4 (DO)). 16c. ifhrta. I- +0 COPPlirl‘Alf Carl Oa _OS 414 v o yiv/ ,r r„ oro(v 4-a OftCr :'K c ti 441 4 b c/ unGtGS in of pef pLC `w a�' Yoe �t q ons ./ v c! REFERENCES (OPTIONAL) To help us Know you better, you may submit up to two (2) references from adults who kno.-- you well. Th-ese letters of reference must be mailed separately and directly to the address provided on this application Form. Applicants should provid.e an addressed, starnped envelope to their rarer - antes For mailing. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL Have your parents complete the Parent/Guardian Approval Form ( see below) and Hurn the corn- peted form in with your application. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL FARM Nome of Applicant (Please print): For and in conside-ation of participation in the Corpus Christi City Council Youth Advisory Committee, the un- dersigned parent or legal guardian for and on behalf of the above named student, his or her heirs, executors, and assigns, does hereby release, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi. and any committee_ sponsors or advisor, their agents, officers, and employees From any and all claims, damages, personal injury, including death and property damage resulting directly or indirectly from the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee, including the planning. organization and presentation of projects as well as transportation to and from all committee activities. The undersigned parent or legal guardian consents to the City of Corpus Christi, its agents, officer and employees to transport or provide transportation whether by public bus service; private or commercial automobile or other appropriate vehicle for the above named student to and from all program activities. All still and video photography becomes the prope-ty of the City of Corpus Christi and the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. The undersigned parent or legal guard'an understands that the above named student is committed to and required to attend monthly Youth Committee rne_t'ngs and sponsored activities. Signatur=- o Parent/Guardian Date Signature of App cant Date rd/ z/ici NOTE. All information on this application is public information pug sL'ant to the provisions of the Public Information Act. WHY SHOULD YOU APPLY? You can make a difference in your community Have a voice in addressing youth issues in your community Become aware of existing resources for youth Be involved in finding solu- tions for youth challenges and concerns Be a leader in your community Have a voice in supporting programs and services affect- ing the youth in Corpus Christi HOW ELSE CAN I GET INVOLVED? Our meetings are open and volunteers are always wel- come for CCYAC projects. City Council's Youth Advisory Committee APPLICATION To be considered for the City Council s Youth Advisory Committee (CCYAC) this application must be completed and returned to' City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's office 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 I._ portant: You must currently be a student in gra-les 9 through 12. as well as a current resident of Corpus Christi Texas in order to apply for participation in the City Council s Youth Advisory Committee Your application will be considered for any vacancy on the committee You may update your application at any time SO NAL INFFQ! MATIQ (Please type or print legibly) Name Ni1 Wadi Name 1 prefer to be called: CurrentradeMLevlel 1 School _{C \ler 'll 36lb\• Date of Birth sex " Name of Parents)/Guardian(s)\QJ OJ� 1Vlarlinez. JUtin wade fir. V Horne Addres City C V L13 Clr zip. Hom Phone Number CeII Phone Number _ .v.. Circle preferred number For contact E-mail Address: ORGANIZATIONS, ACTIVITIES. INTERESTS & COMMUNITY List up to four school, volunteer, religious, social, athletic, community, or special activities which you have partici ated. 1. Witoa‘ lo�or looe 2.11a bra\ � ►c. ktVIkA ►\\Iart‘V e c i1 4. -c)uno Lice AVAILABILITY What time commitments do you have that might affect your Full participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? VT( X h 1 Orn involved �n tnDL I t r h� £ k;kie51 9 am c \e it me g 1% �1-i Qg my Calender t' eNer- up 3o (O ' Osd (' r'e n i- can *id Con & -6. c.k) . GENERAL INFORMATION J. IF you could make a difference for youth in your community, what would you do and how would you do it? Wonno\ _Q m� icer if R1Taoic il�\i t e. �— have been ► An A)t\e opPsAun1 Ie3 D PAto Lt u I1 Ve Yme1(' UhheCQfor -kerntelve5 and RWAe er uCa.,hon tflb 5ome.-Ili fi hall pWbr\A\-e. OJx 2, Who' do you consider to be the major concerns of youth throughout this community? "I\ eI UC DI'1 I el_ l'1Ci- more *e "d d Comm, f ed I'Y1enkr5 are wie'Ied Q 'v loot keb . r o woul d ptaNJOie an m orku.ti-ti -pro \Ok rc\D-Y YANNi :5 2600 \Onb till€ U V"\nn C a1S �n \1( \ 6" ubu d Gto fin• + .ale Lc, VAP orDolwfwe Cal zero. -\)10 emtwai 3. Why do you want to participate in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? 00,X1 3(C, ‘)ur5ue a Greer SA eonyuntottiuz .betvisA pari- brthe G CALNALA Phhav9 C(mrnMeP Ditld 13,,le me Q r n and hence o +neec eck tin n,5 (;.1(1. . bu (e hmonw-)icak arti r6\ak LullJ) in Or L.. 1.', r fit 1. U � REFERENCES (OPTIONAL) To help us know you better, you may submit up to two (2) references from adults who know you well. These letters of reference must be mailed separately and directly to the address provided on this application form. Applicants should provide an addressed, stomped envelope to their refer- ences for mailing. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL Have your parents complete the Parent/Guardian Approval Form ( see below) and turn the com- peted form in with your application. PARENT/QUARDIAN APPROVAL FORM Name of Applicant (Please print): L f\e/ Wotd For and in consideration of participation in the Corpus Christi City Council Youth Advisory Committee, the un- dersigned parent or legal guardian for and on behalf of the above named student, his or her heirs, executors, and assigns, does hereby release, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi, and any committee sponsors or advisors, their agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, damages, personal injury, including death and property damage resulting directly or indirectly from the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee, including the planning, organization and presentation of projects as well as transportation to and from all committee activities, The undersigned parent or legal guardian consents to the City of Corpus Christi, its agents, officers and employees to transport or provide transportation whether 6y public bus service, private or commercial automobile or other appropriate vehicle for the above named student to and from all program activities. All still and video photography becomes the property of the City of Corpus Christi and the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. The undersigned parent or legal guardian understands that the above named student is committed to and required to attend monthly Youth Committee meetings and sponsored activities. Signature Parent Guardian Date Sig L ture of Applicant �B�oV.,2�lb NOTE: All information on this application is public information pursuant to the provisions of the Public Information Act. I WHY SHOULD YOU APPLY? You can make a difference in your community Have a voice in addressing youth issues in your community Become aware of existing resources for youth Be involved in finding solu- tions for youth challenges and concerns Be a leader in your community Have a voice in supporting programs and services affect- ing the youth ;n Corpus Christi HOW ELSE CAN I GET INVOLVED? Our meetings are open and volunteers are alv, ys weI- corrie for CCYAC projects. City Council's Youth Advisory Committee APPLICATION To be considered for the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee (CCYAC) this application must be completed and returned to: City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Important: You must currently be a student in grades 9 through 12, as well as a current resident of Corpus Christi, Texas in order to apply for participation in the City Council s Youth Advisory Committee Your application will be considered for any vacancy on the committee You may update your application at any time PERSONAL INFORMATION (Please type or print legibly) Name _#r ,r -c Name 1 prefer to be called: J e 1,r e Current Grade Level Schooln i,jPe.r 7/1/1'1'.4 ra i & 1 SG17 o1 Date of Birth Sex Name of Parents)/Guardian(s) 17; u PTA. R4 ;r't z [ elit►+:r] &) I,er4- Ra,w,rrez.(s+e9c60t) Home Address City Corpto Zif Home Phone Number Cell Phone Number Circle preferred number for contact E-mail Address: ORGANIZATIONS. ACTIVITIES. INTERESTS & COMMUNITY List up to Four school, volunteer, religious, social, athletic, community, or special activities which you have participated. 1. Nu -I-021101 h o r,5 So c,i e 4 2. tidier 1,r,c,11 S lroo l 3. flit Al PLr T1irh.. fila +lR ho.ors S 4. /1,Iler 1;614 SCL ,l 3tliq;c4r' Catvic:! AVAI LABILITY What time commitments do you have that night affect your full participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? Sc OL1 I 1"'!0 noLa7 41i rom...,6 !.A..y 9 a ►n 5:3op,.. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. If you could make a difference for youth in your community, what would you do and how would you do it? nt, fh;�� E w,,,[A ci •s gel fw,h oe jp,t fti rare. v/l1.41.7;k7alvc1.41.7;k7"l•C Cori �+fitr+t15. w.1/ 01-a ,5Q j& ,nParv.1•Ni, pe.o o 4T +AC- o1 +1Ou?4uy,T,P: a1Gi even -4 +17,1 are r/ , pl9r� aver .SCC,arf i�-rra��.r le 1o�r•,J ..7 act w a�at o'C vv704 r A. 1 ` v o f1,t 1<+c..vr a !ot%Ftr 1.4.,0( fol.-G.74,7y v; kw., Coe. -.1., vn1veei ,n our C.aider••+4►„L Coq emcee!- it. 2. What do you consider to be the major concerns of youth throughout this community? �kc ��,� ks int ti of Cart'fa( fhr,( own ea- •ae] ,S very con cflvr,acr.As c, SW eto , 1 /11.rSt<�� 1 l ve 64oal +i..4- di -a.4 ra(r 4 j1f7t ectkra)1,an J - as wikri. 511141.11 c.u( WJil. rafke Cell' goer 4v,d or rid E.41ervL ttri.ad t1 /C. Yl�rr V�✓i (,e schni5 arc ca- SeSe e'i vinor,.,rnf !eater / vihev,Fvr( oto n4- kf i•rrdi he) vyra bz expos6.1. },PM,554,-cl...et �.vl,;c1, ccti eaf .wr ca ■"rMr4n, .11, v.1 3. Why ao you want to participate in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? c, 1•) Cagretrlf gi.#-L aair.,cprt COm.si 1-« �s q. n�+ gtpttr4lfl& �a bcca 4.re. inv„lardw�i�s:n f'tic c 7 f�. w-4. i- 4, 4 k iL�vrrr 1 OT +111"2 °p1/0( ttotlSA 1- 3-4 rz..r6 t},c Cwrtvrt. .r. . , /IA ref ,hjr. et.b 81';33er 1 ✓IYn v.hq kL y/JJwQ.4VdL 5prea L 9. vv a re.YyGar ft:Mktir. REFERENCES (OPTIONAL) To help us know you better, you may submit up to two (2) references from adults who know you well. These letters of reference must be mailed separately and directly to the address provided on this application form. Applicants should provide an addressed, stamped envelope to their refer- ences for mailing. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL Have your parents complete the Parent/Guardian Approval Form ( see below } and turn the com- peted form in with your application. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL FORM Name of Applicant (Please print): Fel, re, Al v.rf For and in consideration of participation in the Corpus Christi City Council Youth Advisory Committee, the un- dersigned parent or legal guardian for and on behalf of the above named student, his or her heirs, executors, and assigns, does hereby release, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi, and any committee sponsors or advisors, their agents, officers, and employees From any and all claims, damages, personal injury, including death and property damage resulting directly or indirectly from the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee, including the planning, organization and presentation of projects as well as transportation to and from all committee activities. The undersigned parent or legal guardian consents to the City of Corpus Christi, its agents, officers and employees to transport or provide transportation whether by public bus service, private or commercial automobile or other appropriate vehicle for the above named student to and from all program activities. All still and video photography becomes the property of the City of Corpus Christi and the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. The undersigned parent or legal guardian understands that the above named student is committed to and required to attend monthly Youth Committee meetings and sponsored activities. alnm<<. Signature of Parent/Guardi 1I-.1-14 ie,- Signature of Applicant Date Date � I 7 -16 NOTE: All information on this application is public information pursuant to the provisions of the Public Information Act. WHY SHOULD YOU APPLY? You can make a difference in your community Have, a voice in addressing youth issues in your community Become aware of existing resources for youth Be involved in finding solu- tions for youth challenges and concerns Be a leader in your community Have a voice in supporting programs and services affect- ing the youth in Carpus Christi HOW ELSE CAN I GET INVOLVED? Our meetings are open and volunteers are always wel- come for CCYAC projects. It! 4, 1 ? . Lti City Council's Youth Advisory Committee APPLICATION To be considered for the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee (CCYAC) this application must be completed and returned to: City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Important: You must currently be a student in grades 9 through 12, as well as a current resident of Corpus Christi, Texas in order to apply for participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. Your application will be considered for any vacancy on the committee. You may update your application at any time PERSONAL INFORMATION (Please type or print legibly) Name lAn ioive, M owt-i ne Name I prefer to be called: V 4 ()f l r vi, Current Grade Level School Date of Birth Sex (M/F) . _ Name of Parent(s)/Guardian(s) Deli0C ,i 11/km3-Ina €filL Viotti nu Horne Address,,,,, City (orpw Ghnsri Horne Phone Number Zip ell Phone Numbe Circle preferred number For contact Email Address: ORGANIZATIONS, ACTIVITIES, INTERESTS & COMMUNITY List up to Four school, volunteer, religious, social, athletic, community, or special activities which you have participated. 1. ,junior (Donal- Pas icicvvt 2. Gros COU tvi j 4 i rfr.k mod fl elc� 3. t Joit OV O l honor Socie.- 4. S!; C4 I t oinci WItt" Odl'Gls LIiere .V1 AVAILABILITY What time commitments do you have that might affect your full participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? 11/ hOPQ c hmte (&fl1 m d/n' gym, \ IA,eftdd Afft sr urik 1 61.1 TY WLA(d .O/jt&m,Ar 1M lthIYlyp r1 IA4-61Ath O 9 v C6rvmAttes.. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. If you could make a difference for youth in your community, what would you do and how would you do it? t1 I. aid Un. cd cur. c itypiukci , vJn /KA LLA 10 i2rtre w c nit lr mic9 AIr t r'eMt J M OWL C VLt h to oei ' 4,errie, i j Ipe Allag IThit, t F ftt 4.6 (bv1L 'milt rw?k oftato u t 4v Atity 2. Wh do you onsider to be the major concerns of youth throughout this commuUUnity? AI'YLe Mr X92. ('AYI c€A � i A g V i4 th an mu) rictrvrrbt 1 I f rU I `Jl.� L. lL i L 4 _,A. 0 _!Ji, -- --- - fh WA, , 11JA,C, o' i l r\ 0 P f ry :1 ire di2koch1/4 3r It ALAI ,t tAnt,C&LL Lb ,nil 'LernAnuiyuku3.by do you want to participate in the City Counci ..� It . .lt . 1■ .u► s Ai. .1. �IL1f1 .iR Y'A_ !' k.,f �_L_' . !1 �1_'. _A JI a _ ' ,..11# ■ 11,.'1 .t /11,41-101i - �� r ' LO I/ I Jt /_ J itA � I AAA le A d • 1 • (MA Cau Lind o /h Advisot'y Committee? 1 1 REFERENCES (OPTIONAL) To help us know you better, you may submit up to two (2) references from adults who know you well. These letters of reference must be mailed separately and directly to the address provided on this application Form. Applicants should provide an addressed, stamped envelope to their refer- ences for mailing. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL Have your parents complete the Parent/Guardian Approval Form ( see below) and turn the corn- peted form in with your application. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPRQVAL FORM Name of Applicant (Please print): J\QYllir kL k/ i?iykifif For and in consideration of participation in t114 Corpus Christi City Council Youth Advisory Committee, the un- dersigned parent or legal guardian for and on behalf of the above named student, his or her heirs, executors, and assigns, does hereby release, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi, and any committee sponsors or advisors, their agents, officers, and employees From any and all clairns, damages, personal injury, including death and property damage resulting directly or indirectly from the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee, including the planning, organization and presentation of projects as well as transportation to and from all committee activities. The undersigned parent or legal guardian consents to the City of Corpus Christi, its agents, officers and employees to transport or provide transportation whether by public bus service, private or commercial automobile or other appropriate vehicle for the above named student to and from all program activities. All still and video photography becomes the property of the City of Corpus Christi and the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. The undersigned parent or legal guardian understands that the above named student is committed to and required to attend monthly Youth Committee meetings and sponsored activities. Signature of P ent/Guardian /it/ ailt Sign tore o licant PP 11•�•lV Date 11!511(! Date NOTE: All information on this application is public information pursuant to the provisions of the Public Information Act. WHY SHOULD YOU APPLY? You can mace a difference in your community Have a voice in addressing youth issues in your community Become aware of existing resources for youth Be involved in finding solu- tions for youth challenges and concerns Be a leader in your community Have a voice in supporting programs and services affect- ing the youth in Corpus Christi HOW ELSE CAN I GET INVOLVED? Our meetings are open and volunteers are always wel- come for CCYAC projects. City Council's Youth Advisory Committee APPLICATION To be considered for the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee (CCYAC) this application must be completed and returned to: City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Important: You must currently be a student in grades 9 through 12, as well as a current resident of Corpus Christi, Texas in order to apply for participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. Your application will be considered for any vacancy on the committee You may update your application at any time PERSONAL INFORMATION (Please type or print legibly) Name Alln.r4 Name I prefer to be called: Kwrn Current Grade Level School MOoc! a Date of Bir* Sex (M/F) Name of Parents)/Guardian(s) R rlC it i 4 c,rt.arir ci rnrn 3n Horne Address , City CAlZ us ChrtS'1 Zip, Home Phone Number ! Phone Num er Circle preferred number for contact E-mail Address: ORGANIZATIONS, ACTIVITIES, INTERESTS & COMMUNITY List up to four school, volunteer, re'ig aus. social, athletic, community, or special activities which you have participated. 1. NGt 1 - u rIUK Sfrae — We; PR6sicient 2. 9C.ie nCP, CM) ue - SP_Lr'etor i 3.-)rIsaA1 Chit rrri - Rrund VolUnte-er 4. Re(TiemIG 1 r4tv)iN1 AVAILABILITY What time commitments do you have that might affect your full participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? �ivgr , IY1�N11 F ottDn t Q,> a v (ry °1'uu srcp. ably, 1d HS muihrvia.ounLi( kip& ,info*il 5D11 cor‘d Fri cut, 4. 0fito ak 9raof.l titaptsa.ct 4'rcm r0- s fm. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. IF you could make a difference for youth in your community, what would you do and how would you do it? 4,7 th.l ttet4 MI au0.411- rn tu%1 11% .rh itjn rnt, L mn oti L t' „tor the t _Vac) 4241.g.0 if' tsfr +1'N M; "u C .inttiv • tit iivrn d.jA nc.riciu . •1 wo ` .Jl .1 ot, h > . • Ix. I I....i_ Lt ' s r ► , aa,��''V ( U5t [ U., N. a pt. i(IUD uShl i.0\01` 0 n .1j -P01] [�tl�7ti tr u 14I m. 9111, b ttiik t l-+ R i1 P r wi l-ingAtP6 &rt . 2. What do you consider to be the major concerns of youth throughout this community? k(F o n (Plu i It471 it -p, '. &u v • t s thi Qtk n,ntUYV ovb Aux, LaiIiiA.4 'Way % r rr)/11W, ,1h, Its . I, U ri.r n U4\0. J'et'`'' ' r"'1) ,(Arhii olvtnr , Q,t}1 �s tty irLo ituriM afrr1 Ong 1 t D. chi t7t zfruv oimfic(, 0,xh,(1) cigafPrl 01.6 tv 3. Why do you want to participate in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? .wct.nt v 12°111v:wa e In tYw Gi tp [ run() )s ?AK. Adiuim z .lsmnuittri. it r •IIU n rtYwrvarf ThO Pit avatQi r o . rtu niti tom' NLA -1-1/110 c rN, rt. µtic impottaittit, I krAirt 4,2, /plait I A% wit i On rnt,rt ril q rt C i rr n, 1m Wan-. n� lI' rrt1l b...c ► si r c6071'Kvel �iititili Lorna REFERENCES (OPTIONAL1 To help us know you better, you may submit up to two (2) references from adults who know you well. These letters of reference must be mailed separately and directly to the address provided on this application form. Applicants should provide an addressed, stamped envelope to their refer- ences eferences for mailing. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL Have your parents complete the Parent/Guardian Approval Form ( see below) and turn the com- peted form in with your application. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL FORM Name of Applicant (Please print): KI"(YL C)0(1 For and in consideration of participation in the Corpus Christi City Council Youth Advisory Committee, the un- dersigned parent or legal guardian for and on behalf of the above named student, his or her heirs, executors, and assigns, does hereby release, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi, and any committee sponsors or advisors, their agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, damages, personal injury, including death and property damage resulting directly or indirectly From the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee, including the planning, organization and presentation of projects as well as transportation to and From all committee activities. The undersigned parent or legal guardian consents to the City of Corpus Christi, its agents, officers and employees to transport or provide transportation whether by public bus service, private or commercial automobile or other appropriate vehicle for the above named student to and From all program activities. All still and video photography becomes the property of the City of Corpus Christi and the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. The undersigned parent or legal guardian understands that the above named student is committed to and required to attend monthly Youth Committee meetings and sponsored activities. fL la 5!t, Signature oftae ntardian Date Signal re of Ap licant" 11 5-t v Date NOTE: All information on this application is public information pursuant to the provisions of the Public Information Act. t z. ,di'; t ; tf :, i Ii� E it' 1. , (" '';!. y .rti % f lit r. A :i'' -.j'" ',!.c141.11..' d4lih?.•�+ r1 i�tt 'C S1 • it .. ,, ' L ii!; .f t fri.iyrwvL' jr,a,L ij • ,t„. -4 '41441 co to `+iC rrill'iCiiiiiiliitt 1!< 4.2.r t r:,},.% � 1.tix ,r, ► ;'.. ,, tli t A.r }, '..wii il��[?r l 1111!{'j;!lf�IAl!;r4! t„r-,-.1..."{'r y,h„ ' r i+� , •1 r�i J ...1-,.., a ie:1;-..:.... 1 ' ��. it ��' s'�` . ; r,r, i I, �,'�l(.•1z-.iZ I. r,. - ,41 u' ' ( , ..i• r 't • •i. ttj rl"y i •,t} �`r,: ±.,+�.F 1�F �+ ,. �, � � �l F r'i f4.!!j•,,,,,,.•!.l � t r t• i•'ri rr ;:ilii. EU._. t�,i ky'11k.::i:111 :'1 LIL-.tr•�• .; 1, !S '. r .ter:. 1, '.(r .,y t` r,, E t.1011,-:!'..:.-; ,: r . ' r, •, „ $r - +/i (t:�4t� L7lr .L7lui Mkt 1 i:'.7r +� a p.,,,,,,",,,..,:,..R.,;1:., .,., t� r f if% , lty.. {i �. rr1 r". •tl' L?1p i,'i4 a' t' (c w;'4"-'_, yrI .'4 t « • yip t�r 7,. • J APPLICATION To be considered for the City Council's Youth Advisory committee (CCYAC) students will need to complete this application and returned to their respective high school principal's office. Important: You must currently be a student in l I th.grade, as well as a current resident of Corpus Christi, Texas in order to apply for participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. You may update your application at any time. PERSONAi. INFORMATION (Please type or print Iegib y, Nanme'r, Name I prefer to be called: Current Grade Level — School Date of Birth Sex (MIF) _ Name of Parent(s)/Guardian(s) Laura, t boar) ( i'ore,wsk Home Addrper City Colt u ' Zip . Home Phone Number Cell Phone Number 1 Circle prefencd number for contact E-mail Address: activities wtucn you nave participated. I. 5+0 ttic.il •f- (� 00 }�u 1 (tom % /� Jjr`� 2. 1 . t b f.,; 4 � � 7 ` l•� . kl,�) Y as lf— / f -, e.. vlOr' v,�tol7te �. tiSf- �jc� +$ CG1Ur�h �, y � tiIo : [ ; )" il' t might affec- ;+;r1 C:.-nnurec? rt vote full participation in the 111_1,2,•_,51c15. T ge.. ±:eXth1e. r 1'ltis c 1 u �j Vit r i.l,` '7A, 5J100 nr(' /uon°kap wty FOT-LI r _J }•) i . ? von cothl make a Lli:fer rc.:' 1'M youth in your community, what would you do and .ro,vJ 1F,'1_ Ella you LIO 1t i 114. rou i d r pi (c-6,40 A-ir you c+, 'Y pvas ,mo.'s to 441 �► f S,.r,' r. [DY--/� Rt..t!!'i 'f'min �ti�A.a._5'46*.-i1..IL 1 i v a 5 r 'aZ LL. eg tQr, -Lfe. . w 7• chi'larder to D.; i+: i11ajo; Lo..cerrls +, L,t ,l -r ✓,+1 !J r1 71.4 awl 00 ror }}",, of youth throughout this community,' cs o Le.r7,64 Ob p.J 4- 0%-e. txrraf fr✓ c ,�,� jJ Il•�, y 1 n • !� •rL -'01 ±rti,/,.{a :v..��`.r.Q. [DYfOCQJ►'y! . Wn•• ddo,eti wart to p3;-ticar ,tte to the City Council's Youth Advisory Comrnittee? , a:Y !J 1,J<'r. 74e f�_— 1 r� '1,e LI �t� " Coaela IS V.5.)"1 -1s, rrd om T ease. &lapt rxy... it w_ ___4L1a162.,_ 1Lr<d ,flu tv sE acrd 014-'� psst PAR NI/GUARDIANAPPROVALFORvM Nae of Applicant (Ple se pf�int): 'lo,'li"% P. •�jASioro�,.�s� Name i For.ir,,d in coLsideraion of p.3ricipt:tiou in the Corpus Christi City Council Youth Advisory Cornuiime, the undersigned parent or legal guardian for and on behalf of the above named stu- dent, his or her hofs, executors, and assigns, does hereby release, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpu4 Christi. any coin nittee sponsors or advisors, their agents, officers, and emp.oyees from any and all claims, damages, personal injury, including death and property dantsrze resulting directly or indirectly from the City Council's Youth Advisory Currimittee, including the p'i:rimng. o gAiz.ition and presentation of projects as Well as trans- por..:ion to and 21£rri a::dvities. The undersigned parent or legal guardian con- sents iu !lie City o Cot;r.cs Christi, its agt:nts, officers and employees to transport or provide tr:an,,,lc:rtat:ort w he cher by 3ub1ic bus service, private or commercial automobile or other appro- priate vehicle f), :ht: abo•re named stt.I.J. t to and from all program activities. All still and video phc.tc. rally bz:,o_ es 1:e l-r;tp_.ty of the City of Corpus Christi and the City Cour_Lil's Youth Advisory Cortirnitte•.. The ._.,.�.fsi��,:d parent or l'-,g}t uart ran understands 1 t the above named student is commit- ted u :.= rd required !0 alit.',"it monthly Youth Coinrni a meetimis and spot] Bred, tivities. ' r ii, / �/ j /—)7'di)) (! � UJ ' c 1 ! I., S gr,,,ai� cif Par.2a Guiallf.tn Date frt �I/1f ig,..tture of .'ppi.C,.271. Date iVt rf : r�fi ;nicrr.a:::: cn this a; *j:at t•t! i; pnt+lic ii; formation pursuaut b l a p.�vt,tons of die Public Infrnrnation Act. You carl make a ditfjreslre in your community Have a voice In addressing youth issues in your conitT�rinity Become aware of existing resources for youth Be involved in finding r;o u- tian for youth challenges and concerns Be i leader in your community Have a voice in supporting programs and services affect- ing the youth in Corpus Christi HOW ELSE CAN I GET INVOLVED? Our meetings are open and volunteers are always vvel come for CCYAC projects. mot P jg tip To be considered for the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee (CCYAC) this application must be completed and returned to. City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Important You must currently be a student in grades 9 through 12. as well as a current resident of Corpus Christi, Texas in order to apply for participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. Your application will be considered for any vacancy on the committee. You may update your application at any time PER,_ONAL INFORMATION. (Please type or print legibly) Name {/ems �J07fv Name I prefer to be called: 1y Current Grade Level School W . p„, //86 k70/ Date of Birth Sex (M/FL Name of Parent(s)/Guardian(s) ranee J;htitov, v-0,- :;,o1 Home` Address City (2rpw 6hr. s Home Phone Number Cell Phone Number Circ preferred number For contact E-mail Address: 1. t +/ !�. V L ! • • fq /7/17 (/LU^ A i 4 S /rG raG .i4 i 2. 3. /cy /e .-2 4/s K..1z, 4/411 3. Ad/ /16s, 4/A/f 4. 144R. 4' ,CoG. e 4, AVAILABILITY What time commitments do you have that might affect your full participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? fit / Gre / /Ifes /'IOH4 J z 4, GENERAL INFORMATION 1. If you could make a difference for youth in your community, what would you do and how would you do it? ehto F Z. 21.* 7' L� mm.� _� 1.1941.• ;� fen/7...1e, / A. -r../ e) 2 t re 1,04.451Me 2. What do you consider to be the major concerns of youth throughout this community? /`6,3; no/ h a..v e44e A�a.-Z Uhf rO GJOa�s 3. Why do you want to participate in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? !G 17e 47 (lr, e.,4a2.2.tf s A-115,, / /s 00'.7 "if /7i ences for mailing. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL Have your parents complete the Parent/Guardian Approval Form ( see below ) and turn the com- peted form in with your application. P N F Name of Applicant (Please print): F7h Or For and in consideration of participation in the Corpus Christi City Council Youth Advisory Committee, the un- dersigned parent or legal guardian For and on behalf of the above named student, his or her heirs, executors, and assigns, does hereby release, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi, and any committee sponsors or advisors, their agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, damages, personal injury, including death and property damage resulting directly or indirectly from the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee, including the planning, organization and presentation of projects as well as transportation to and from all committee activities. The undersigned parent or legal guardian consents to the City of Corpus Christi, its agents, officers and employees to transport or provide transportation whether by public bus service, private or commercial automobile or other appropriate vehicle for the above named student to and From all program activities. All still and video photography becomes the property of the City of Corpus Christi and the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. The undersigned parent or legal guardian understands that the above named student is committed to and required to attend monthly Youth Committee meetings and sponsored activities. ��, �—�„ /2//2/16 natu. Guardian Date Signt / Signat re of Ay cant 2//2//i Dat NOTE- All information on this application is public information pursuant to the provisions of the Public Information Act. WHY SHOULD YOU APPLY? You can make a difference in your community Have a voice in addressing youth issues in your community Become aware of existing resources for youth Be involved in finding solu- tions for youth challenges and concerns Be a leader in your community r Have a voice in supporting programs and services affect- ing the youth in Corpus Christi HOW ELSE CAN I GET INVOLVED? Our meetings are open and volunteers are always wel- come for CCYAC projects. J f}I City Council's Youth Advisory Committee APPLICATION To be considered for the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee (CCYAC) this application must be completed and returned to: City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Important You must currently be a student in grades 9 through 12 as well as a current resident of Corpus Christi. Texas in order to apply for participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee Your appl cation will be cons•dered for any vacancy on the committee. You may update your application at any time PERSONAL INFORMATION (Please type or print legibly) Name .Jini rrif e-, */ Name I prefer to be called: Current Grade Level School Date of Birth Sex (M/FL Name of Parents)/Guardian(s) Home Address - City Zip. Home Phone Numberbe- Cell Phone Number f - Circle preferred number for contact E-mail Address: ORGANIZATIONS. ACTIVITIES, INTERESTS & COMMUNITY List up to four school, volunteer, religious, social, athletic, community, or special activities which you have participated. 1. IAvsrC bi 1 2. FoV 'rhr:i H 1 3. F- 4. 4. H G_� l�- AVAILABILITY What time commitments do you have that might affect your full participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? ot t s 1 GENERAL INFORMATION 1. If you could make a difference for youth in your community, what would you do and how would you do it? 0y t. 2. What do you consider to be the major concerns of youth throughout this community? \r_• � i '� S 3. Why do you want to participate in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? . •f l REFERENCES (OPTIONAL) To help us know you better, you may submit up to two (2) references from adults who know you well. These letters of reference must be mailed separately and directly to the address provided on this application form. Applicants should provide an addressed, stamped envelope to their refer- ences for mailing. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL Have your parents complete the Parent/Guardian Approval Form ( see below) and turn the com- peted form in with your application. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL FORM Name of Applicant (Please print): j(Lk I 1 _ 1V,( 41. CC, ('Ci `-,\,1 \ c j For and in consideration of participation in the Corpus Christi City Council Youth Advisory Committee, the un- dersigned parent or legal guardian For and on behalf of the above named student, his or her heirs, executors, and assigns, does hereby release, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi, and any committee sponsors or advisors, their agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, damages, personal injury, including death and property damage resulting directly or indirectly From the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee, including the planning, organization and presentation of projects as well as transportation to and From all committee activities. The undersigned parent or legal guardian consents to the City of Corpus Christi, its agents, officers and employees to transport or provide transportation whether by public bus service, private or commercial automobile or other appropriate vehicle For the above named student to and from all program activities. All still and video photography becomes the property of the City of Corpus Christi and the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. The undersigned parent or legal guardian understands that the above named student is committed to and required to attend monthly Youth Committee meetings and sponsored activities. Signature of Parent))Guardian 4 j i 301 Date 1 ' Signature of Applicant Date NOTE: All information on this application is public information pursuant to the provisions of the Public Information Act. You OU 1 APPLE You can make:a. • iffferencein yourcommuhity Have a voice in addressing youth issues in your community Become aware of existing resources for youth Be involved in finding solu- tions for youth challenges and concerns Be a leader in your community Have a voice in supporting programs and services affect- ing the youth in Corpus Christi HOW ELSE CAN I GET INVOLVED? Our meetings are open and volunteers are always wel- come for CCYAC projects. pil Ili W1;1 { City Council's Youth Advisory Committee APPLICATION To be considered for the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee (CCYAC) this application and returned to: City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Important You must currently be a student in grades 9 through 12, as well as a current resident of Corpus Christi, Texas in order to apply for participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. Your application will be considered for any vacancy on the committee. You may update your application at any time PERSONAE, INFORMATION (Please type or print legibly) Name caw/R-0 aGtCI Name I prefer to be called: Current Grade Level School Date of Birtl Sex (M/F)_ Name of Parent(s)/Guardian(s) Bec y .vc 'oS Home Address city carpus Chri ffi Zip Home Phone Number Cell Phone Numbei Circle preferred number for contact E-mail Address: ORGANIZATIONS. ACTIVITIES, INTERESTS & COMMUNITY List up to four school, volunteer, religious, social, athletic, community, or special activities which you have participated. i. NCl/WNW kbir or SOC, 2. St. Per ' sP ry ce of A -p Sties 'i i rj h School 1101,4,11-1 rou Gp. 3. R.n*rA N I n } 1 -exact 4. X1,10W - tilttd nom WO, Cc. Mot CititYDIcte Potruvrtr Fhny AVAILABILITY What time commitments do you have that might affect your full participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? Novi-hwast Corns Christi L(tFCe IA 'SI - Coath ih� p -tato hg , lAmplyiN, owl() COhC-fski &1n work. P ophS rna,rOVt -OmctS I h nay; 1/00t1ld pit WA a VIA0t1 to arnakw Coach) b tau ow*. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. If you could make a difference for youth in your community, what would you do and how would you do it? If t had Ghct.Vtc-e tb tm U a d A Fkr4MC. ?br 4014 -til I vt t Gaw�wt uh � h�, tn►ntAUd Mate a group or cIId, III wul tjouth oymp, /mai ID aim ii- tom/n:13' the I4c4 Mao -Rut 0Q/wiz, 00ed fstod,nr wino wowtf Cit. ctilvtes.Fvtirlotte twiAld be aCckut i[-thaw(iigtd b JoIh 2. What do you consider to be the major concerns of youth throughout this community? SPL ►m k f C C4]nCfervyis of iirLtyouth ►r0u00014t flea commfou ,y watttd lot au vas i- a vuttu - of 1--e,Pans tnytim n vvdcl e cciKol w h o a.Y' Z ,par tt CApah vv tin u,ndtxarlt cL i as w -e Li aS {INA r rar n Ci ram to i rti th ucj • 3. Why do you want to participate in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? tioci t to parr 1- t Li p f -e in 1& Ci hi (DMA i s youth Avt vi sort' COPY mi tt u hccam st: t wad- to tot a cart- of a cfiotp who Iptt r s nu 1 tiVt s and im at,t s a al -6-eAr-aw-e , ho 1- on hi o r rr the tcV. S of- wioYuj Qf4ntyou , i h 1 t (owtPn UU, j ill • REFERENCES (OPTIONAL) To help us know you better, you may submit up to two (2) references from adults who know you well. These letters of reference must be mailed separately and directly to the address provided on this application form. Applicants should provide an addressed, stamped envelope to their refer- ences for mailing. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPRQVAL Have your parents complete the Parent/Guardian Approval Form ( see below ) and turn the com- peted form in with your application. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL FORM Name of Applicant (Please print): IOiCti11riCa V ckn,SFor and in consideration of participation in the Crpus Christi CityCouncil Youth Advisory Y Committee the un- dersigned parent or legal guardian for and on behalf of the above named student, his or her heirs, executors, and assigns, does hereby release, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi, and any committee sponsors or advisors, their agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, damages, personal injury, including death and property damage resulting directly or indirectly from the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee, including the planning, organization and presentation of projects as well as transportation to and from all committee activities. The undersigned parent or legal guardian consents to the City of Corpus Christi, its agents, officers and employees to transport or provide transportation whether by public bus service, private or commercial automobile or other appropriate vehicle for the above named student to and from all program activities. All still and video photography becomes the property of the City of Corpus Christi and the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. The undersigned parent or legal guardian understands that the above named student is committed to and required to attend monthly Youth Committee meetings and sponsored activities. Sigrfature of arent/Guardian Si•natur of Appli Date Date Z NOTE: All information on this application is public information pursuant to the provisions of the Public information Act WHY SHOULD YOU APPLY? You can make a difference in your cornrnuanity Have a voice in addressing youth issues in your community Become aware of existing resources for youth Be involved in find;na solu- tions for youth challenges and concerns Be a leader in your community Have a voice in supporting programs and services affect- ing the youth in Corpus Christi HOW ELSE CAN I GET INVOLVED? Our rneetangs ale open and volinteers are always wel- come for CCYAC projects. City Council's Youth Advisory Committee APPLICATION To be considered for the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee (CCYAC) this application must be completed and returned to: City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Important: You must currently be a student in grades 9 through 12, as well as a current resident of Corpus Christi, Texas in order to apply for participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. Your application will be considered for any vacancy on the committee. You may update your application at any time PERSONAL INFORMATION (Please type or print legibly) Name LCZ.E-y1eri- y'1, Name I prefer tobecalled: �CQ [cjit Current Grade Level _ School Date of Birth _ Sex (M/F)__ Name of Parent(s)/Guardian(s) Ck79( T PLL I Home Address _ City 00/4 u S Zip_ Home Phone Number CeII Phone Number Circle preferred number for contact E-mail Address: ORGANIZATIONS, ACTIVITIES, INTERESTS & COMMUNITY List up to Four school, volunteer, religious, social, athletic, community, or special activities which you have participated. 1. Ft5r. 2. del -p� 1 011_01,2CJA. 3. tU Loc . cj 111_; lac) 13A4zt 11 4. Ua-1-r015 PO 115 cb(L AVAILABILITY What time commitments do you have that might affect your full participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? /Tataufs GENERAL INFORMATION 1. If you could make a difference for youth in your community, what would you do and how would you do it? {{ t I ft V )b'S 1-1 f op (7.1_--Lit o s Pro -111; 4-b - '� t prn.4 PrS 4e5 70-1 (cs -1-U e tz. scl, 4 s t5 4..A-otiGe...e s 2. What do you consider to be the major concerns of youth throughout this community? p -GI t` t V) C67-1;115LLAMAS ert_C7\ {Z 1- 1 �-i� 4e LL 3. Why do you want to participate in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? Wi. At) Aid F.- 'AO F A I 1 -i VItN41 tkt( %t- S A-ti1cf bF 0,75-(eg. 4(2.InF i'1�12�• REFERENCES (OPTIONAL) To help us know you better, you may submit up to two (2) references from adults who know you well. These letters of reference must be mailed separately and directly to the address provided on this application form. Applicants should provide an addressed, stamped envelope to their refer- ences eferences for mailing. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL Have your parents complete the Parent/Guardian Approval Form ( see below) and turn the com- peted form in with your application. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL FORM Name of Applicant (Please print): ei l -b �� Ae For and in consideration of participation in the Corpus Christi City Council Youth Advisory Committee, the un- dersigned parent or legal guardian For and on behalf of the above named student, his or her heirs, executors, and assigns, does hereby release, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi, and any committee sponsors or advisors, their agents, officers, and employees From any and all claims, damages, personal injury, including death and property damage resulting directly or indirectly from the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee, including the planning, organization and presentation of projects as well as transportation to and From all committee activities. The undersigned parent or legal guardian consents to the City of Corpus Christi, its agents, officers and employees to transport or provide transportation whether by public bus service, private or commercial automobile or other appropriate vehicle for the above named student to and from all program activities. All still and video photography becomes the property of the City of Corpus Christi and the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. The undersigned parent or legal guardian understands that the above named student is committed to and required to attend monthly Youth Committee meetings and sponsored activities. Signa ure of Pt ent/Guardian (Z6f Date % .1 I -2A —I4 Signature of ASpplicant Date NOTE: All information on this application is public information pursuant to the provisions of the Public Information Act. WHY SHOULD YOU APPLY? You can make a difference in your commLJ'uty Have, a voce in addressing youth issues in your community Become aware of existing resources for youth Be involved in finding solu- tions for youth challenges and concerns Be a leader hi your co:mmrrmuni:y Have a voice in support ng programs and seg}.rices affec'- inq the youth in Corpus Chis; HOW ELSE CAN 1 GET INVOLVED? Cur meetings are omen and volunteers are always wel- come fry CCYAC pr()loots. City Council's Youth Advisory Commitee APPLICATION To be considered for the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee (CCYAC) this application must be completed and returned to: City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's office 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Important: You must currently be a student in grades 9 through 12, as well as a current resident of Corpus Christi, Texas in order to apply for participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. Your application will be considered for any vacancy an the committee. You may update your application at any time PERSONAL INFORMATION (Please type or print legibly) Name MCI - / rec Name I prefer to be called: Current Grade Level School I L L* Q W heli cell Po .I Date of Birth Sex (M/F)_ Name of Parent(s)/Guardian(s) �1.Q 7OrS' Home Address CityCL)rrI)s C:hrtc-- zip Home Phone Number Cell Phone Numb Circle preferred number for contact E-mail Address: ORGANIZATIONS. ACTIVITIES, INTERESTS & COMMUNITY List up to Four school, volunteer, religious, social, athletic, community, or special activities which you have participated. 1. VO [ 1] Iii t ej2_ kfGa4 E mewllime .'i+ to ELevri fyitq r J 2. M(fr VOlurithm RaSKL t 11 3. Fe IIOV V lP (W rJirH/i1-ettc rlcldc o- A. tig. ��1 �• a ed ��� ►c vt AVAILABILITY What time commitments do you have that might affect your full participation in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? N 0 I'1! , 1 Gum U1 Van UV VW L (,j O a 4c3 1IVOVV ii W I X L(I,Q..ITf -H Iii (1' V rig !s . MC/ GENERAL INFORMATION 1. IF you could make a difference For youth in your community, what would you do and how would you do it? JIVOUIai kkgirt h cre+JLiM NI/out:Melt W=14 b.e on r rectrirkioris On W ho hie_ a 1 I O IA e,.1 1 N -1l 1 s -bac° 1 l ,coK pur pace iw -E- IIS h4v9oU+ IN Du LI 1,)-b v -1-fru oti-ti a am cP q cc .eF+W1)(f 1 Irl x,1411 d VI V t 4 r4-Ee Haut 11.4 1s IN VIA+ 1 Pk Ir) C,f-ti 11 11g. 2. W at o you consider to be the major concerns of youth throughout this community? -1} I<vlt] o r ()ono oft in I D .1a1lO' s SOU fl -i j IiV N W 12,e. -fit . cu 1 UR, batt, si rt . Thr \ fl /WI r 1,,e9 Vt rl 4tAq t f, (a i I --iiu rQ. IS M n 4i fi .# f CD 1 Vi -1011 . i VI (oLi Ity V+ t-) -f,,et 1 U br e 1Q C IS (AJ V tVl int nJtI 1T. S-(-4v-t.-1 --(i't.04 +M. Most. 3. Why o you want to participate in the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee? I .Ln j 0 t Ili 1 ri r'r (*ars. 1 a Iso hold rti j I-1 % i vi cfa rda r.i r 1 whim 3'1 1 InVokvt rvitIsttf Velour r1.41 t2Ati onc 1?f IM.49.wlI,,er pf ti.� (,iiib (DUN ci1'� \`oU 1n •fcJVISe tnwitin i+fee. ti 1.1 lit Vis toll (1.;)I REFERENCES (OPTIONAL, To help us know you better, you may submit up to two (2) references from adults who know you well. These letters of reference must be mailed separately and directly to the address provided on this application Form. Applicants should provide an addressed, stamped envelope to their refer- ences for mailing. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPR_OVAL Have your parents complete the Parent/Guardian Approval Form ( see below) and turn the com- peted Form in with your application. PARENT/GUARDIAN APPROVAL FORM Name of Applicant (Please print): T Y i (I CO ft ors' For and in consideration of participation in the Corpus Christi City Council Youth Advisory Committee, the un- dersigned parent or legal guardian for and on behalf of the above named student, his or her heirs, executors, and assigns, does hereby release, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi, and any committee sponsors or advisors, their agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, damages, personal injury, including death and property damage resulting directly or indirectly from the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee, including the planning, organization and presentation of projects as well as transportation to and from all committee activities. The undersigned parent or legal guardian consents to the City of Corpus Christi, its agents, officers and employees to transport or provide transportation whether by public bus service, private or commercial automobile or other appropriate vehicle for the above named student to and from all program activities. All still and video photography becomes the property of the City of Corpus Christi and the City Council's Youth Advisory Committee. The undersigned parent or legal guardian understands that the above named student is committed to and required to attend monthly Youth Committee meetings and sponsored activities. -Y)/ Signature of Parent/Guardia/ Date J �i izqlle II lig Iae Signature 6 Applicant Date 9 PP NOTE: All information on this application is public information pursuant to the provisions of the Public Information Act. City Of Corpus Christi CORPUS CHRISTI AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD DETAILS T OVERVIEW SIZE 5 Seats TERM LENGTH 4 Years TERM LIMIT N/A The Corpus Christi Aquifer Storage and Recovery Conservation District develops and protects municipal aquifer storage areas created by the City of Corpus Christi. The district may implement and develop aquifer storage and recovery projects. DETAILS COMPOSITION Five (5) directors appointed by the City Council to serve four-year staggered terms. If a vacancy occurs on the board, the board may appoint a director to serve the remainder of the term. The board shall annually elect officers and officers must be confirmed by the City Council. The initial directors shall draw lots to determine which three (3) directors shall serve four-year terms that expire at the end of the calendar year four years after the effective date of the Act, and which two directors shall serve two-year terms that expire at the end of the calendar year two years after the effective date of the Act. CREATION / AUTHORITY H.B. 3513 effective 6/18/05. MEETS On Call TERM DETAILS Four-year staggered terms. DEPARTMENT Water Department COMMITTEE/ SUBCOMMITEE N/A AGENDAS OTHER INFORMATION CORPUS CHRISTI AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY CONSERVATION DISTRICT Page 1 of 1 Dan McGinn Fred Segundo Tom Tagliabue CORPUS CHRISTI AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY CONSERVATION DISTRICT CORPUS CHRISTI AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY CONSERVATION DISTRICT CORPUS CHRISTI AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY CONSERVATION DISTRICT _A!!!!!!!!11 End date Position Active Partial 12/31/2019 Vice -President Active 2 12/31/2017 President Active Partial 12/31/2017 Secretary Corpus Christi Aquifer Storage and Recovery Conservation District Members January 24, 2017 (Note: Section 8811.024 of the Texas Special District Local Laws Code requires the City Council to confirm the election of officers annually.) The board is recommending the confirmation of the following officers: Dan McGinn (Vice -President), Fred Segundo (President) and Tom Tagliabue (Secretary). Margie Rose CORPUS CHRISTI AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY CONSERVATION DISTRICT Active 2 12/31/2017 Mark Van Vleck CORPUS CHRISTI AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY CONSERVATION DISTRICT Active Partial 12/31/2019 City Of Corpus Christi LIBRARY BOARD BOARD DETAILS T OVERVIEW SIZE 9 Seats TERM LENGTH 2 Years TERM LIMIT 6 Years The Library Board shall be advisory to the City Council and its duties shall be to investigate and recommend to the Council matters relating to library services. DETAILS COMPOSITION Nine (9) members of which seven (7) members shall be appointed for two-year terms by the City Council, one (1) member shall be nominated by the La Retama Club, and one (1) shall be nominated by the Friends of the Corpus Christi Public Libraries Board for a term of two -years. Each nominee must be confirmed by a majority of City Council Members. CREATION / AUTHORITY Section 2-75, Code of Ordinances. Ordinance Nos. 1889, 12044, 13235, 18473, 18606, M85-0399, 8-27-85; 19830, 7-7-87; M87-0330, 9-22-87; 20115, 12-17-87; 20294, 5-3-88; 20674, 5-16-89; 022900, 4-15-97; 027945, 11-18-08. MEETS 1st Tuesday of every month, 10:30 a.m., La Retama Central Library Board Room, 2nd Floor, and occasional location changes to other Branch Libraries. TERM DETAILS Two-year terms. DEPARTMENT Libraries COMMITTEE/ SUBCOMMITEE AGENDAS OTHER INFORMATION LIBRARY BOARD Page 1 of 1 Library Board Members January 24, 2017 Four (4) vacancies with terms to 11/5/18 representing the following categories: 2 - At -Large, 1 - Member Nominated by the La Retama Club and 1 - Member Nominated by the Friends of the Libraries Board. (Note: The Friends of the Libraries Board is nominating Harris M. Worchel. Mr. Worchel currently serves as an At -Large member and would need to be realigned to fill that position.) 1111 El Leanne Winkler Libby LIBRARY BOARD Not seeking reappointment District 4 Partial 11/5/2016 At -Large Member Alice Nixon LIBRARY BOARD Seeking reappointment District 5 Partial 11/5/2016 La Retama Club Member 100% 4/4 Natalie Rogen LIBRARY BOARD Has met the six-year term limitation District 4 3 11/5/2016 Friends of the Libraries Board Member Harris M. Worchel LIBRARY BOARD Seeking reappointment District 5 Partial 11/5/2016 At -Large Member 100% 9/9 Margaret Jane Epley Kratzig LIBRARY BOARD Active District 2 Partial 11/5/2017 Member Juanita Hernandez LIBRARY BOARD Active District 1 1 11/5/2017 Member Abigail Bair LIBRARY BOARD Active District 4 1 11/5/2017 Member Brian Solarek LIBRARY BOARD Active District 4 2 11/5/2017 Chair Candace S. Hart LIBRARY BOARD Active District 1 Partial 11/5/2017 Member Library Board Applicants January 24, 2017 Boards Applying For District Employer Hatcher E. Chalkley Library Board "1.District 4 Retired Kathy R. Ellington Library Board District 3 Retired Tom Krepel Library Board District 4 Semi -Retired Janis G. Wood Library Board District 5 Retired BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FOR A CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Jan 21, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Dr. Prefix Hatcher First Name Email Address E. Chalkley Middle Initial Last Name Which Boards would you like to apply for? LIBRARY BOARD Street Address Suite or Apt City State Postal Code District 4 What district do you live in? Primary Phone Alternate Phone retired Employer Job Title Work Address - Street Address and Suite Number Work Address - City Work Address - State Work Address - Zip Code Dr. Hatcher E. Chalkley Page 1 of 4 Work Phone drhatch@patandhatch.org Work E-mail address Home/Primary Address Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: None. Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) See attached resume. Also: Attended more than half the Library Board meetings, as a member of the public, since 2006. Served on the Library Board subcommittee on long-range planning in 2011. Registered Voter? r• Yes r No Current resident of the city? t7 Yes ` No 13 If yes, how many years? chalkley bio for library 2016.pdf Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Dr. Hatcher E. Chalkley Page 2 of 4 Male Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. w I Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. l�J I Agree Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. fiJ I Agree Dr. Hatcher E. Chalkley Page 3 of 4 Board -specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to LIBRARY BOARD. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * IW None of the Above Question applies to multiple boards. *Qualified elector/voter means a person who is 18 years of age or older; a United States Citizen; has not been determined by a final judgement of a court to be mentally incapacitated; has not been finally convicted of a felony or, if so convicted has fully discharged the person's sentence including incarceration, parole or supervision, or completed a period of probation ordered by an court; and a resident of this State. Dr. Hatcher E. Chalkley Page 4 of 4 Hatcher E. Chalkley Born in Richmond, Virginia, Hatcher Chalkley (BSEE VPI 1964, MSEE Stanford 1965, PhDEE VPI 1968), moved to Texas immediately after grad school. He worked for Texas Instruments, Inc. for 28 years, mostly in the Dallas area, as a systems engineer. He was awarded the designation Senior Member, Technical Staff there in 1981. During his career at TI, he worked in a variety of assignments on defense, FAA and commercial communications and navigation systems design and development. This work included signal processing algorithm development, performance analysis, specification writing and negotiation, and ongoing interaction with customers. Dr. Chalkley retired from TI at the end of 1996 and moved to Corpus Christi in 2002 where he lives with his wife, Dr. Patricia Hudson, a licensed psychotherapist and author. He is a Licensed Professional Engineer (retired) in Texas. He has dabbled in flying, scuba diving, photography (including underwater), sailing (including offshore passages), and computer programming. He is currently on the Audio-Visual/Website Team for a local church. BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FOR A CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Nov 06, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Kathy Prefix First Name Email Address R. Ellington Middle Initial Last Name Which Boards would you like to apply for? LIBRARY BOARD Street Address Suite or Apt City State Postal Code District 4 What district do you live in? Primary Phone Alternate Phone Semi -Retired Employer Job Title Work Address - Street Address and Suite Number Work Address - City Work Address - State Work Address - Zip Code Kathy R. Ellington Page 1 of 4 Work Phone kaki3881@gmail.com Work E-mail address Home/Primary Address Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: No Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Board Member of Symphony Guild of Corpus Christi Degree -Early Childhood Education/Library Science minor Certified Adult Literacy Coach Community Non -Profit Consultant Certified Leadership Professional Registered Voter? r• Yes r No Current resident of the city? r: Yes ` No 1.5 years If yes, how many years? Kathy Ellington Resume November 2016.docx Upload a Resume Kathy Ellington Cover Letter for Corpus Christi Library Board.docx Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Kathy R. Ellington Page 2 of 4 Female Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. w I Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. l�J I Agree Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. fiJ I Agree Kathy R. Ellington Page 3 of 4 Board -specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to LIBRARY BOARD. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * IW None of the Above Question applies to multiple boards. *Qualified elector/voter means a person who is 18 years of age or older; a United States Citizen; has not been determined by a final judgement of a court to be mentally incapacitated; has not been finally convicted of a felony or, if so convicted has fully discharged the person's sentence including incarceration, parole or supervision, or completed a period of probation ordered by an court; and a resident of this State. Kathy R. Ellington Page 4 of 4 Kathy R. Ellington CAREER ACCOMPLISHMENTS 1. Leadership Prince William • Worked with Chamber of Commerce Task Force to establish a community leadership program in Prince William County, Virginia • Guided the 501(c)3 process from beginning to end • Developed a 10 month curriculum designed to bring high level corporate, government and nonprofit leaders together for open dialogue around community issues and opportunities. • Recruited a pool of leaders yearly for the program • Managed annual budget of $150,000 • Obtained 100% funding for annual underwriting 2. The LIGHTHOUSE at Wilkerson Terrace • Developed a Pre-Kindergarten/Parenting program within a Federal Housing Project • Provided instruction in parenting skills, life skills and job training to low- income parents • Assisted in marketing the LIGHTHOUSE program to the community • Assisted in obtaining nonprofit status and funding 3. The HOME AGAIN Project • Successfully launched a program for homeless families in Redlands, California • Worked with city administration to coordinate initial operating grant • Wrote and acquired grants • Effectively guided the program in a merger with a larger non-profit • Succeeded in establishing the program as a prototype for the State of California Innovative Leadership • Selected by the Shreveport Junior League to serve as volunteer Chairman of the Red River Revel, an 8 day outdoor visual and performing arts festival • Coordinated tasks of 5,000 volunteers • Raised over $100,000 in underwriting and investment support through community solicitation • Coordinated social service consortium to prepare/register homeless children in public school • Coordinated volunteer support committee for an adoption agency • Organized a grant workshop for social service agencies • Served as a mentor for new teachers • Designed curriculum for private, state accredited pre -k program • Served on committee to study/evaluate admission charge to add sustainability to the Louisiana Peach Festival • Awarded community grants for Health Partnership • Initial founder and board member of Cedar Creek School Foundation • Formed Foundation Development Committee for Redlands United Methodist Church Community Involvement • Junior League of Shreveport • The Red River Revel Governing Board • Board of Directors St. Joseph Catholic School • United Way of North Louisiana Strategic Advisory Committee • Redlands United Methodist Church Foundation Development Committee • Redlands Bowl Associates — (community amphitheater fundraising organization) • Cedar Creek School Strategic Development Committee, Ruston, LA. • Aquia Episcopal Church Community Outreach Board • Board of Regents, Leadership Prince William • Board of Directors, Prince William Health Partnership • Board of Trustees, Butte Silver Bow Public Library System • Board Member, Butte Symphony Association • Board Member, Mother Lode Theater Butte, Montana • Corpus Christi Symphony Guild, Special Events Co -Chair Professional Development • Louisiana Tech University, Elementary Education • Grambling State University, Early Childhood Education • Association of Leadership Professionals • Certified Literacy Coach Experience • Butte Literacy Program, Butte, Montana January 2015 -August 2015 ❖ Coordinator ❖ Responsible for day to day operations of program including grant writing, grant supervision, budget, fund-raising ❖ Marketed program to the community ❖ Created volunteer training manual ❖ Recruited and trained literacy volunteers ❖ Recruited adult learners in need of obtaining/improving literacy skills ■ Leadership Arlington, Arlington, Virginia March 2013 -July 2013 ❖ Chief Development Officer ■ Leadership Prince William, Prince William, Virginia 2006-2013 ❖ Established base for innovative community based leadership program ■ Cedar Creek School, Ruston, Louisiana 1998-2006 ❖ Department Head, Pre -Kindergarten ❖ Lead Teacher- Pre -Kindergarten • Lincoln Parish Head Start, Ruston, Louisiana 1998 School Year ❖ Teacher Aide/Teacher Assistant ■ Family Service Association, Redlands, California 1996-1998 ❖ Division Director, Home Again Project ■ Home Again Project, Redlands, California 1993-1996 ❖ Founding director for social service agency providing counseling to homeless families ■ Grant Writer, City of Redlands, California - 1992-1993 ❖ Responsible for writing and acquiring grants for City Departments ■ The Lighthouse, Shreveport, Louisiana - 1988-1992 ❖ Pioneered innovative program in public housing project ❖ Obtained funding ❖ Instructed children ❖ Coached parenting skills, job training ❖ Marketed program to community Family Refer ■ Married to E. Jay Ellington, Interim Assistant City Manager, City of Corpus Christi, Texas ■ Three children, two grandchildren nces: • Stef Johnson Executive Director, Butte Silver Bow Public Library • Cathy Maloney Superintendent Butte Silver Bow Public Schools • Revonda Stordahl Executive Director, Butte Silver Bow Housing Authority • Molly Grove Director, Campus Relations George Mason University • Jan Day Gravel Principal, Janus Development Corporation Kathy R. Ellington November 5, 2016 Tamera Franklin City of Corpus Christi, Texas 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, Texas Dear Ms. Franklin, I am pleased to submit my letter of interest to serve as a member of the Corpus Christi Library Board. My background as a progressive community leader coupled with many years of non-profit management experience qualifies me to be an advisor for our library system. As a Trustee for the Butte Silver Bow County, Montana Library system, I was responsible for policy decisions and library operations. Trustees of the library approved budgets and personnel contracts and approved innovative library activities. During my tenure as a Trustee, I was on the hiring committee to recruit and hire the library director. It is my feeling that libraries serve as a compass for evidence based decisions to serve the community today and in the future. Libraries anchor communities and are central to activities of our city. I firmly believe libraries are an integral ingredient in providing quality of life in Corpus Christi. As former Executive Director of the Butte, Montana Literacy Program, I recognize low literacy skills create barriers to seeking and maintaining steady employment. I understand the importance of job skill training as a pathway for reducing poverty and increasing self-sufficiency. I am proud to have assisted in the development of strategies to help others maximize their potential. I also have experience researching and writing grants to enhance funding. I pride myself in approaching my work with precision, professionalism and care. I am decisive, detail oriented and work well under pressure. As past Executive Director of a community leadership program I understand how business, government and non -profits convene leaders to improve communities. I believe new partnerships and synergetic solutions are established when all parties come together in a collaborative leadership effort. It is my belief that as a community we are most effective when we work together and connect ideas, skills and resources to create solutions. I believe in focusing on building blocks of a good quality of life for everyone which includes education, financial stability and health. My resume is attached for your review. Thank you for allowing me to be considered to serve on the Library Board. Respectfully yours, Kathy R. Ellington Kathy R. Ellington BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FOR A CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Jan 05, 2017 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Tom Krepel Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? LIBRARY BOARD Street Address Suite or Apt City State Postal Code District 5 What district do you live in? Primary Phone Alternate Phone retired n/a Employer Job Title n/a Work Address - Street Address and Suite Number n/a Work Address - City n/a Work Address - State n/a Work Address - Zip Code Tom Krepel Page 1 of 4 n/a Work Phone tkrepel@gmail.com Work E-mail address Home/Primary Address Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: No. Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) - BSEd (1973), MEd (1979), PhD (1983) - University of Nebraska -Retired educator - served as classroom teacher; college faculty; variety of administrative posts in higher education, including dean (TAMUCC), chief academic officer (Chadron State College), president (Chadron State College, Fairmont State University. - Professional experience includes extensive involvement in state legislative processes, including legislative staff (Nebraska legislature - 1978-82), chief government relations officer for a state land-grant university (1986-90), president of two state institutions of higher education (1997-2005; 2009- 11). - Sustained record of community involvement, including president of Ella Barnes Elementary PTA (c.1994), chair of Allocations Committee of United Way of the Coastal Bend (c.1992-4), volunteer firefighter and EMS - Nebraska (1975-90). Registered Voter? Yes No Current resident of the city? t° Yes r No retirement and return to CRP - total 8 If yes, how many years? resume-jun12.doc Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Tom Krepel Page 2 of 4 Demographics Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Ethnicity Male Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. 117 I Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. TJ I Agree Tom Krepel Page 3 of 4 Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. w I Agree Board -specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to LIBRARY BOARD. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * i None of the Above Question applies to multiple boards. *Qualified elector/voter means a person who is 18 years of age or older; a United States Citizen; has not been determined by a final judgement of a court to be mentally incapacitated; has not been finally convicted of a felony or, if so convicted has fully discharged the person's sentence including incarceration, parole or supervision, or completed a period of probation ordered by an court; and a resident of this State. Tom Krepel Page 4 of 4 THOMAS L. KREPEL Present position: Career Counselor, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois Education: Ph.D. 1983 University of Nebraska -Lincoln M.Ed. 1979 University of Nebraska -Lincoln B.S. 1973 University of Nebraska -Lincoln Continued professional education: Illinois and Federal Emergency Management Agency courses (ICS/EOC interface, Intro. to ICS-IS100, ICS for single resoures-IS200, Command and general staff function in ICS), 2008. New Presidents' Academy, American Association of State Colleges and Universities, 1999 Institute for the Management of Lifelong Education, Harvard University, 1993 Institute on Statistical Analysis for Education Policy, American Educational Research Association, 1992 Certification: Nebraska Professional Administrative and Supervisory Certificate Certificate in Public Policy Analysis and Program Evaluation, University of Nebraska -Lincoln Summary of experience: 2011 — 2012 Visiting Professor of Adult and Higher Education, Northern Illinois University 2009 - 2011 President, Fairmont (WV) State University 2005 —2009 Assistant to the President, Northern Illinois University 1998 - 2005 President, Professor of Educational Administration, Chadron (NE) State College 1998 Interim President, Professor of Educational Administration, Chadron (NE) State College 1997 - 1998 1992 - 1997 Senior Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs, Professor of Educational Administration, Chadron (NE) State College Dean of University Outreach and Associate Professor of Educational Administration, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi T. Krepel Page 2 1990 - 1992 1986 - 1990 1983 - 1986 1978 - 1982 Associate Professor, Educational Administration, St. Cloud (MN) State University Assistant to the Chancellor and Director of University Relations, Assistant Professor of Educational Administration, University of Nebraska -Lincoln Assistant Professor, Educational Administration, University of New Orleans Staff Assistant to the Executive Board; Research Analyst to the Education Committee, Nebraska Legislature Selected publications: LaBanc, B.H., Krepel, T.L., Johnson, B.J. & Hermann, L. (2010). Managing the whirlwind: Planning for and responding to a campus in crisis. In B.O. Hemphill & B. H. LaBanc (Eds.), Enough is enough: A student affairs perspective on preparedness and response to a campus shooting. (pp. 53-81). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing. Krepel, T., Polak, S., Blegen, M., & Krepel, P. (2004). Ray and Faye Graves Photographic Studio Collection. Chadron State College. Chadron, NE. Krepel, T.L. (2000). Investing in Nebraska's future - Investing in intellectual capital. State And Local Government In Nebraska: Part VI - The Nebraska Of The Future. Nebraska Tax Research Council. Krepel, T.L., Grady, M.L., & Paradise, L.V. (1993). Facing opposite directions? Local school board responses to the national goals for education. Planning & Changing, 24, 2-20. Krepel, T.L., Grady, M.L., & Paradise, L.V. (1992). National goals, local priorities: What board members say about the U.S. education agenda. The American School Board Journal, 178, 31-2. Krepel, T.L., Bodelson, P.J., Pierson Ellingson, S., & VandeWalle, D. (1992). The Minnesota educational effectiveness program research and development project: An analysis of the organizational characteristics of the Minnesota educational effectiveness program. Resources in Education. ERIC #ED344 289. Krepel, T.L., Grady, M.L., & McGrew, K.S. (1991). The national goals for education: Challenges in policy, measurement, and research. Issues in Educational Leadership, 2, 48-9. Krepel, T.L. (1987) Contemporary decision theory and educational leadership. Educational Research Quarterly, 11, 37-44. T. Krepel Page 3 Selected professional activities: Consultant -Evaluator, Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools, 2003 — 2012 Committee on Economic and Workforce Development, American Association of State Colleges and Universities, 2003 — 2005 Editorial Board, Journal of Women in Educational Leadership, 2002 — present Co-chair, Rural Issues Forum, American Association of State Colleges and Universities, 2001— 2003 Executive Committee, Co-chair Economic Development Committee, Nebraska Business -Higher Education Forum, 2000 - 2005 Education Council, Nebraska Information Technology Commission, 1999 — 2005 Executive Board, National Council of Professors of Educational Administration, 1994 - 1997 Policy Issues Committee, American Society for Public Administration, 1993 - 1994 Editorial Board, National Forum of Applied Educational Research, 1992 — 2000 Telecommunications Committee, Minnesota State University System, 1991 -1992 Fellow, Atlantic -Pacific Exchange Program, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1989 Selected grants, contracts, awards: National Job Corps Association, Job Corps Alpha Star Award, Washington, D.C. 2001. U.S. Department of Labor, Kansas City Regional Office, Outstanding Community Organization Award 2001. Assessment Center Research and Development Project, Corpus Christi Army Depot, 1995 Coastal Bend Industry Applied Science Education Alliance, Port of Corpus Christi Board of Trade, 1993, 1995 - 1997 Early Prevention of School Failure Program, Corpus Christi Independent School District, 1994, 1995 T. Krepel Page 4 Supervisor Development and Proficiency Program, Corpus Christi Army Depot, 1993 - 1996 Nonprofit Organization Leadership Development Program, Coastal Bend Community Foundation, 1993 International Trade Development Program, Corpus Christi Chamber of Commerce, 1993 Detailed professional vita and references available upon request. (j un12) BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FORM FOR A CITY BOARD, Submit Date: Nov 11, 2016 COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE FOR THE Status: submitted Profile Janis G. Wood Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? LIBRARY BOARD Street Address Suite or Apt City State Postal Code District 3 What district do you live in? Primary Phone Alternate Phone Retired Employer Job Title Work Address - Street Address and Suite Number Work Address - City Work Address - State Work Address - Zip Code Janis G. Wood Page 1 of 4 Work Phone jgwood@grandecom.net Work E-mail address Home/Primary Address Preferred Mailing Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: No. Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) BA in English, MS in Library Science. Past president of the CC American Assoc. of University Women, member of the CC Area Retired Teachers, member of the CC Delta Kappa Gamma Education Society, member of the Nueces County Historical Society. Registered Voter? Yes r No Current resident of the city? r: Yes ` No 20 If yes, how many years? Janis brief bio.docx Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Janis G. Wood Page 2 of 4 Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Female Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. ISI I Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. w I Agree Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. I Agree Janis G. Wood Page 3 of 4 Board -specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to LIBRARY BOARD. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * V' None of the Above Question applies to multiple boards. *Qualified elector/voter means a person who is 18 years of age or older; a United States Citizen; has not been determined by a final judgement of a court to be mentally incapacitated; has not been finally convicted of a felony or, if so convicted has fully discharged the person's sentence including incarceration, parole or supervision, or completed a period of probation ordered by an court; and a resident of this State. Janis G. Wood Page 4 of 4 Corpus Christi is my home town. I graduated from Ray High School and attended Del Mar College. I married Corpus Christi native Ernest Wood, who was an Air Force officer. We lived in several states while Ernest was in the Air Force for 20 years. We had three sons. In 1973 the family moved to McAllen, Texas where I finished two college degrees. I graduated from Leadership McAllen and was appointed to the Public Library Board. I was employed by McAllen ISD where I was the Director of Libraries for the (then) 32 schools in McAllen. When I retired from education in 1995, Ernest and I returned to Corpus Christi where two of our three sons live. That was a very good move on our part. AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of January 17, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 DATE: December 28, 2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Constance P. Sanchez, Director of Financial Services ConstanceP@cctexas.com (361) 826-3227 Appointment of Financial Advisor for Solid Waste Certificates of Obligation CAPTION: Motion authorizing the appointment of M. E. Allison, & Co., as Financial Advisor for the City of Corpus Christi, Texas Combination Tax and Limited Pledge Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Taxable Series 2017B in an amount not to exceed $2,500,000. PURPOSE: The City plans to issue Combination Tax and Limited Pledge Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Taxable Series 2017B in an amount not to exceed $2,500,000 for the purpose of paying contractual obligations relating to a Gas Collection and Control System (GCCS) that must be operational by November 11, 2017 at the City's landfill and for the procurement of a flare. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Issuance of bonds requires utilization of a financing team which is made up of three parts: the financial advisor, bond counsel, and the underwriting syndicate. This agenda item authorizes the appointment of M. E. Allison & Co., Inc. as financial advisor for these transactions. See the attachment for the Financial Advisor's contract. Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. is currently under contract with the City to serve as the City's bond counsel and will serve as the second part of our financing team. The third part of the financing team is the underwriters, and selection of the syndicate of underwriters from the City's pool of approved underwriters is being recommended for delegation to the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, and Director of Financial Services. ALTERNATIVES: n/a OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: n/a CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This item conforms to City policy. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: n/a DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: • Financial Services • Bond Counsel • City Attorney's Office FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Not Applicable ❑ Operating Expense ❑ Revenue ❑ CIP FISCAL YEAR: Project to Date Exp. (CIP Only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Budget - - - - Encumbered/Expended amount of (date) - - - - This item - - - - BALANCE - - - - FUND(S): CIP Funds COMMENTS: n/a RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Financial Advisor Contract Form 1295 TELEPHONE 210-930-4000 FAX 210-930-4001 .%f X sfavoxe 1,., ,Xie. TELEPHONE 361-861-1131 FAX 361-881-9220 �p INVESTMENT BANKERS //' ��� 950 Kale Maas Mom/ 800,/i'o ,92teZi u�i M' Y ,2t ,_7at�%ot fro, 9L ,s 78,e0ftfc5' Wyead g24:44. �% 7~-3707 December 29, 2016 City of Corpus Christi, Texas 1201 Leopard Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Re: Up to $2,500,000* City of Corpus Christi, Texas Combination Tax and Limited Pledge Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Taxable Series 2017B ******************************************************************************* In regard to serving as the City's financial advisor and consultant, we submit the following proposal or agreement for your approval and acceptance. 1. Term. This Agreement shall be terminated by the delivery to the Purchaser of all the securities described above, whether delivered all at one time or in installments. It may be extended for an additional period by mutual agreement in writing. This agreement may be terminated at any time by either of us by giving thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. 2. Duties. The duties and responsibilities to be performed under this agreement include consulting and advising the City in the development and implementation of a financing plan for the issuance and sale of up to $2,500,000* City of Corpus Christi, Texas Combination Tax and Limited Pledge Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Taxable Series 2017B. 3. Compensation. The fee will be based on the size of the issue, and computed on the attached schedule, Exhibit A. The fee will be due and payable from the proceeds of the Bonds. We would expect to be reimbursed for actual out-of-pocket expenses for telephone, photocopies, facsimile transmissions, printing, computer, if any, and travel incurred in connection with ratings, municipal bond insurance or Closing of such financing(s). 4. Special Conditions. In addition to the terms and obligations herein contained, this proposal and agreement is subject to the following special conditions: a) M. E. Allison & Co., Inc. will incur and pay on behalf of the City the approved expenses in relation to the issuance of the Bonds and will submit said expenses for reimbursement at Closing. Approved expenses will include, but not be limited to, printing, shipping and posting of Official Statement, printing of Bonds, and travel expenses in relation thereto, Bond sale advertisements, municipal bond insurance premiums, Attorney General's fees, etc. Preliminary, subject to change. Continued ... di. 67 Jziiita04,1, INVESTMENT BANKERS December 29, 2016 City of Corpus Christi, Texas 1201 Leopard Re: Up to $2,500,000* City of Corpus Christi, Texas Combination Tax and Limited Pledge Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Taxable Series 2017B Page 2 (b) The City will pay Bond Attorney, Rating Agency fees and Paying Agent/Registrar directly or will direct M. E. Allison & Co., Inc. to pay these fees on behalf of the City from the cost of issuance proceeds subsequent to the closing of the bond transaction. (c) The City will at all times remain responsible for all fees incurred on behalf of the City in relation to the proposed bond issue. In the event the contemplated issue is not completed, the City will not owe the financial advisory fee to M. E. Allison & Co., Inc., but the City will remain responsible for all expenses incurred by the Firm on behalf of the City as well as all direct expenses of the City including Bond Attorney and Rating Agency fees. 5. This proposal is submitted in duplicate originals. When accepted by the City, it will constitute the entire agreement between the City and the undersigned for the purpose and considerations herein specified. Your acceptance will be indicated by proper signatures of your authorized officers or representatives on both copies and the returning of one executed copy to us. Respectfully submitted, M. E. ALLISON & CO., INC. By Authorized Representative ACCEPTED on behalf of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas the day of , 2017. Authorized Official *Preliminary, subject to change INVESTMENT BANKERS EXHIBIT A FINANCIAL ADVISORY FEE SCHEDULE GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS More than And Not More than $ $ 250,000 $7,500 plus $20.00 per $1,000 for all over $150,000 250,000 350,000 $9,500 plus $10.00 per $1,000 for all over $250,000 350,000 500,000 $10,500 plus $8.00 per $1,000 for all over $350,000 500,000 700,000 $11,700 plus $7.00 per $1,000 for all over $500,000 700,000 1,000,000 $13,100 plus $6.00 per $1,000 for all over $700,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 $14,900 plus $5.00 per $1,000 for all over $1,000,000 1,500,000 5,000,000 $17,400 plus $3.00 per $1,000 for all over $1,500,000 5,000,000 10,000,000 $27,900 plus $1.65 per $1,000 for all over $5,000,000 10,000,000 20,000,000 $36,150 plus $1.00 per $1,000 for all over $10,000,000 20,000,000 No Limit $46,150 plus $0.85 per $1,000 for all over $20,000,000 REVENUE BONDS, COMBINATION TAX AND REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION, REFUNDING BONDS, OBLIGATIONS USING A REVENUE SOURCE AS REPAYMENT, DIRECT SUBSIDY OBLIGATIONS OR LEASE PURCHASE In the event the Bonds to be issued are Revenue Bonds or Combination Tax and Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Refunding Bonds, Obligations using a revenue source as repayment, Direct Subsidy Obligations or Lease Purchase, the fee shall be the amount computed from the above schedule, plus 25°i). CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-149468 Date Filed: 12/30/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. M. E. Allison & Co., Inc. San Antonio, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi, TX 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. 2017B Co'S Bond Financial Advisory Services 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary Allison Jr., Milton San Antonio, TX United States X Allison, Christopher San Antonio, TX United States X Seal, Mark San Antonio, TX United States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. ❑ 6 AFFIDAVIT, - affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. am:4k #12 -et: I swear, or ' s;4:"- AMANDA M mamma'l4.. MY COMIA SSION DIPIRES *4 i� ; * 08/25/2020 V NOTARY ID: 130796674 Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said C. Irk ri5 )lek ! �j T)1 )-St) , this the ¢ day of Deter 'L 20 J , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. ? a.cc a_m / el a � Iii etx..) a -P allolto. ignature of officer a ministering oath Printed n. me of officer admin .tering oath Title of officer admini A ring oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.277 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of January 17, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 DATE: January 10, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Constance P. Sanchez, Director of Financial Services ConstanceP@cctexas.com (361) 826-3227 Notice of Intention to Issue Certificates of Obligation CAPTION: Resolution by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, authorizing and approving publication of Notice of Intention to issue Certificates of Obligation; complying with the requirements contained in Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12; and providing an effective date. PURPOSE: The City plans on issuing up to $2,500,000 of certificates of obligation to fund regulatory capital projects for Solid Waste. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: At the August 9, 2016, City Council meeting, the City Council discussed upcoming bond projects for the following fiscal year. A subsequent memo was sent to the City Council outlining the City's pending bond projects for Fiscal Year 2017. One pending issuance included in the memo was the funding of Solid Waste's Fiscal Year 2017 capital needs totaling $18,000,000. Since that time, City staff has been able to narrow down the size of the projects in addition to utilizing existing funds available for Solid Waste to fund those projects so that only $2,500,000 of certificates of obligation will be needed in Fiscal Year 2017 rather than $18,000,000. The certificates of obligation will be needed to fund some key capital projects for Solid Waste that are associated with a compliance deadline, including a Gas Collection and Control System (GCCS) that must be operational by November 11, 2017 and the procurement of a flare. To fund these projects, the City plans on issuing Certificates of Obligation in an amount not to exceed $2,500,000. State law requires that a notice of intention be published when Certificates of Obligation are to be sold. The notice must be published once a week for two consecutive weeks in a newspaper, with the date of the first publication to be before the 30th day before the date tentatively set for the passage of the ordinance authorizing the issuance of the certificates. The ordinance authorizing the issuance of the first series of certificates is tentatively scheduled as a first reading on March 21, 2017 with a second and final reading on March 28, 2017. The City anticipates publishing this notice in the Corpus Christi Caller -Times on Sunday, February 5, 2017 and Sunday, February 12, 2017. ALTERNATIVES: n/a OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: n/a CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This item conforms to City policy. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: n/a DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: • Financial Services • Engineering Services • Bond Counsel • City Attorney's Office FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Operating Expense X Revenue ❑ CIP FISCAL YEAR: Project to Date Exp. (CIP Only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Budget - $ 2,500,000 - $ 2,500,000 Encumbered/Expended amount of (date) - - - - This item - $ 2,500,000 - $ 2,500,000 BALANCE - - - - FUND(S): CIP Fund COMMENTS: n/a RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution RESOLUTION RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION; COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION RULE 15c2-12; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City Council (the City Council) of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (the City) has determined that it is advisable and necessary to issue and sell one or more series of certificates of obligation (the Certificates) as taxable or tax-exempt obligations and in an aggregate amount not to exceed $2,500,000 as provided pursuant to the provisions of the Certificate of Obligation Act of 1971, as amended, Texas Local Government Code, Section 271.041 through Section 271.064, for the purpose of paying contractual obligations of the City to be incurred for making permanent public improvements and for other public purposes, to -wit: (1) the construction of improvements to the City's solid waste facilities, including (without limitation) paying contractual obligations to be incurred with respect to the construction of a gas collection and control system and procurement of a gas flare, (2) the purchase of materials, supplies, equipment, machinery, landscaping, land, and rights-of-way for authorized needs and purposes relating to the aforementioned facilities; and (3) the payment of professional services related to the design, construction, management and financing of the aforementioned projects; and WHEREAS, prior to the offering, sale, and issuance of the Certificates, the appropriate officials of the City must review and approve the distribution of a "deemed final" preliminary official statement (the Official Statement) in order to comply with the requirements contained in 17 C.F.R. §240.15c2-12 (the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule); and WHEREAS, based upon their review of the Official Statement, the appropriate officials of the City must find to the best of their knowledge and belief, after reasonable investigation, that the representations of facts pertaining to the City contained in the Official Statement are true and correct and that, except as disclosed in the Official Statement, there are no facts pertaining to the City that would adversely affect the issuance of the Certificates or the City's ability to pay the debt service requirements on the Certificates when due; and WHEREAS, the City Council will comply with the requirements contained in the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule concerning the creation of a contractual obligation between the City and the proposed purchaser(s) of the Certificates (the Purchasers) to provide the Purchasers with an Official Statement in a time and manner that will enable the Purchasers to comply with the distribution requirements and continuing disclosure requirements contained in the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule; and WHEREAS, the City Council authorizes the City Manager, the Director of Financial Services, the City Secretary, and the City Attorney, as appropriate, or their designees, to review, 62231940.2 approve, and execute any document or certificate in order to allow the City to comply with the requirements contained in the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule; and WHEREAS, prior to the issuance of the Certificates, the City Council is required to publish notice of its intention to issue the Certificates in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, such notice stating (i) the time and place the City Council tentatively proposes to pass the ordinance authorizing the issuance of the Certificates, (ii) the maximum amount proposed to be issued, (iii) the purposes for which the Certificates are to be issued, (iv) and the manner in which the City Council proposes to pay the Certificates; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determines that such documents pertaining to the sale of the Certificates should be approved, and the City should proceed with the giving of notice of intention to issue the Certificates in the time, form, and manner provided by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the adoption of this Resolution is in the best interests of the residents of the City; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS THAT: SECTION 1: The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice to be published of the City Council's intention to issue the Certificates in an amount not to exceed $2,500,000 for the purpose of paying contractual obligations of the City to be incurred for making permanent public improvements and for other public purposes, to -wit: (1) the construction of improvements to the City's solid waste facilities, including (without limitation) paying contractual obligations to be incurred with respect to the construction of a gas collection and control system and procurement of a gas flare, (2) the purchase of materials, supplies, equipment, machinery, landscaping, land, and rights-of-way for authorized needs and purposes relating to the aforementioned facilities; and (3) the payment of professional services related to the design, construction, management and financing of the aforementioned projects. The Certificates will be payable from the levy of an annual ad valorem tax, within the limitations prescribed by law, upon all taxable property within the City and additionally from a pledge of and lien on certain revenues derived from the operation of the City's solid waste system facilities. The notice hereby approved and authorized to be published shall read substantially in the form and content of Exhibit A attached hereto, which notice is incorporated herein by reference as a part of this Resolution for all purposes. SECTION 2: The City Secretary shall cause the notice described in Section 1 to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, once a week for two consecutive weeks, the date of the first publication shall be at least thirty (30) days prior to the date stated therein for passage of the ordinance authorizing the issuance of the Certificates. SECTION 3: The City Manager and the Director of Financial Services, as appropriate, or their designees, are authorized to review and approve the Official Statement pertaining to the offering, sale, and issuance of the Certificates and to execute any document or certificate in order to comply with the requirements contained in the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule. 62231940.2 -2- SECTION 4. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. SECTION 5: All ordinances and resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. SECTION 6: This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. SECTION 7: If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. SECTION 8: It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. SECTION 9: This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after the date of its adoption, and it is so resolved. 62231940.2 [The remainder of this page intentionally left blank] -3- PASSED AND APPROVED, this the 24th day of January, 2017. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary (CITY SEAL) APPROVED THIS 24th DAY OF JANUARY, 2017: Miles Risley, City Attorney 62231940.2 S-1 THE STATE OF TEXAS )( COUNTY OF NUECES )( I, the undersigned, City Secretary of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of a Resolution passed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (and of the minutes pertaining thereto) on the 24th day of January, 2017, relating to establishing the City's intention to publish a notice of intention concerning the issuance of certificates of obligation, which Resolution is duly of record in the minutes of said City Council, and said meeting was open to the public, and public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given, all as required by Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. EXECUTED UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL of said City, this the 17th day of January, 2017. City Secretary (CITY SEAL) 62231940.2 S-2 The foregoing resolution was read and passed on this the 24th day of January, 2017, by the following vote: Dan McQueen Rudy Garza Carolyn Vaughn Paulette Guajardo Ben Molina Michael Hunter Lucy Rubio Joe McComb Greg Smith PASSED AND APPROVED, this the 24th day of January, 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta Dan McQueen City Secretary Mayor 62231940.2 S-3 Exhibit A NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas will convene at its regular meeting place in the City Hall in Corpus Christi, Texas, at 2:00 P.M., Corpus Christi, Texas time on March 28, 2017, and, during such meeting, the City Council will, on second reading (and after a first reading to occur at the March 21, 2017 meeting of the City Council), consider the passage of an ordinance or ordinances and take such other actions as may be deemed necessary to authorize the issuance of one or more series of certificates of obligation in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $2,500,000 for the purpose or purposes of paying contractual obligations of the City to be incurred for making permanent public improvements and for other public purposes, to -wit: (1) the construction of improvements to the City's solid waste facilities, including (without limitation) paying contractual obligations to be incurred with respect to the construction of a gas collection and control system and procurement of a gas flare, (2) the purchase of materials, supplies, equipment, machinery, landscaping, land, and rights-of- way for authorized needs and purposes relating to the aforementioned facilities; and (3) the payment of professional services related to the design, construction, management and financing of the aforementioned projects. The certificates of obligation (the Certificates) will be payable from the levy of an annual ad valorem tax, within the limitations prescribed by law, upon all taxable property within the City and from a lien on and pledge of certain revenues derived by the City from the operation of the City's solid waste system. The Certificates are to be issued, and this notice is given, under and pursuant to the provisions of the Certificate of Obligation Act of 1971, as amended, Texas Local Government Code Section 271.041 through Section 271.064, Subchapter G of Chapter 363, as amended, Texas Health and Safety Code, and the City's Home Rule Charter. 62231940.2 A-1 /s/ Rebecca Huerta City Secretary, City of Corpus Christi, Texas AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of January 17, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 DATE: January 4, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Constance P. Sanchez, Director of Financial Services ConstanceP@cctexas.com (361) 826-3227 Reimbursement Resolution for Certificates of Obligation CAPTION: Resolution relating to establishing the City's intention to reimburse itself for the prior lawful expenditure of funds from the proceeds one or more series of tax-exempt or taxable obligations to be issued by the City in an aggregate amount not to exceed $9,650,000 for authorized purposes relating to constructing various City improvements; authorizing matters incident and related thereto; and providing an effective date. PURPOSE: The City plans on issuing up to $9,650,000 of certificates of obligation to finish the remaining 2014 Bond Projects. In the event that expenses are incurred prior to the receipt of the proceeds from the certificates of obligation, this resolution gives the City the authority to reimburse itself from the proceeds for qualifying expenditures. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: At the August 16, 2016, City Council meeting, the City Council discussed issuing certificates of obligation in Fiscal Year 2017 to complete three projects from Bond 2014. The projects discussed were as follows: • Rodd Field & Yorktown $3,900,000 • Six Points 3,750,000 • Street Lighting Improvements 2,000,000 $9,650,000 For the City to be eligible for reimbursement of any expenditures incurred prior to the issuance of the certificates of obligation, the City must declare its intent to reimburse itself for payments made prior to the bonds being sold. This action must meet specific U. S. Treasury Regulations and requires approval by the City Council. ALTERNATIVES: Not applicable OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Not Applicable ❑ Operating Expense ❑ Revenue ❑ CIP FISCAL YEAR: Project to Date Exp. (CIP Only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Budget - Debt Payments - - - - Encumbered/Expended amount of (date) - - - - This item - - - BALANCE - - - - FUND(S): COMMENTS: Not applicable RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution as presented. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This item conforms to City policy. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: • Financial Services • Bond Counsel • City Attorney's Office LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RELATING TO ESTABLISHING THE CITY'S INTENTION TO REIMBURSE ITSELF FOR THE PRIOR LAWFUL EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FROM THE PROCEEDS ONE OR MORE SERIES OF TAX-EXEMPT OR TAXABLE OBLIGATIONS TO BE ISSUED BY THE CITY IN AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $9,650,000 FOR AUTHORIZED PURPOSES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTING VARIOUS CITY IMPROVEMENTS; AUTHORIZING MATTERS INCIDENT AND RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City Council (the Governing Body) of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (the Issuer) has entered into or will enter into various contracts pertaining to the expenditure of lawfully available funds of the Issuer to finance the costs associated with (i) completion of those capital projects approved at an election held within the City on November 4, 2014 being, primarily, City street projects (the Construction Costs), (ii) the payment of various engineering costs, including design testing, design engineering, and construction inspection related to the Construction Costs (the Engineering Costs), (iii) the payment of various architectural costs, including preparation of plans and specifications and various other plans and drawings related to the Construction Costs (the Architectural Costs), and (iv) the payment of various administrative costs, including the fees of bond counsel, financial advisor, project manager, project consultant, other professionals, and bond printer (the Administrative Costs) [the Construction Costs, the Engineering Costs, the Architectural Costs, and the Administrative Costs collectively constitute the costs of the projects that are the subject of this Resolution (the Project)]; and WHEREAS, the provisions of Section 1201.042, as amended, Texas Government Code provide that the proceeds from the sale of obligations issued to finance the acquisition, construction, equipping, or furnishing of any project or facilities, such as the Project, may be used to reimburse the Issuer for costs attributable to such project or facilities paid or incurred before the date of issuance of such obligations; and WHEREAS, the United States Department of Treasury (the Department) released Regulation Section 1.150-2 (the Regulations) which establishes when the proceeds of obligations are spent and therefore are no longer subject to various federal income tax restrictions contained in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code); and WHEREAS, the Issuer intends to reimburse itself, within eighteen months from the later of the date of expenditure or the date the property financed is placed in service (but in no event more than three years after the original expenditures are paid), for the prior lawful capital expenditure of funds from the proceeds of one or more series of taxable or tax-exempt obligations (the Obligations) that the Issuer currently contemplates issuing in an amount not to exceed $9,650,000 to finance a portion of the costs of the Project; and WHEREAS, under the Regulations, to fund such reimbursement with proceeds of the Obligations, the Issuer must declare its expectation ultimately to make such reimbursement before making the expenditures; and 82492512.2 WHEREAS, the Issuer hereby finds and determines that the reimbursement for the prior expenditure of funds of the Issuer is not inconsistent with the Issuer's budgetary and financial circumstances; and WHEREAS, the Governing Body hereby finds and determines that the adoption of this Resolution is in the best interests of the citizens of the Issuer; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS THAT: SECTION 1. This Resolution is a declaration of intent to establish the Issuer's reasonable, official intent under section 1.150-2 of the Regulations to reimburse itself from certain of the proceeds of the Obligations for any capital expenditures previously incurred (not more than 60 days prior to the date hereof') or to be incurred with respect to the Project from the Issuer's General Fund or other lawfully available funds of the Issuer. SECTION 2. The Issuer intends to issue the Obligations and allocate within 30 days after the date of issuance of the Obligations the proceeds therefrom to reimburse the Issuer for prior lawful expenditures with respect to the Project in a manner to comply with the Regulations. SECTION 3. The reimbursed expenditure will be a type properly chargeable to a capital account (or would be so chargeable with a proper election) under general federal income tax principles. SECTION 4. The Issuer intends to otherwise comply, in addition to those matters addressed within this Resolution, with all the requirements contained in the Regulations. SECTION 5. This Resolution may be relied upon by the appropriate officials at the Office of the Attorney General for the State of Texas and establishes compliance by the Issuer with the requirements of Texas law and the Regulations. SECTION 6. With respect to the proceeds of the Obligations allocated to reimburse the Issuer for prior expenditures, the Issuer shall not employ an abusive device under Treasury Regulation Section 1.148-10, including using within one year of the reimbursement allocation, the funds corresponding to the proceeds of the Obligations in a manner that results in the creation of "replacement proceeds", as defined in Treasury Regulation Section 1.148-1, of the Obligations or another issue of tax-exempt obligations. SECTION 7. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Governing Body. SECTION 8. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. 82492512.2 - 2 SECTION 9. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. SECTION 10. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the Governing Body hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. SECTION 11. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. SECTION 12. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. 82492512.2 -3 PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED on this the 24th day of January, 2017. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary (CITY SEAL) APPROVED THIS 24th DAY OF JANUARY, 2017: Miles Risley, City Attorney 82492512.2 S-1 THE STATE OF TEXAS )( COUNTY OF NUECES )( I, the undersigned, City Secretary of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of a Resolution passed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (and of the minutes pertaining thereto) on the 24th day of January, 2017, relating to establishing the City's intention to reimburse itself in an amount not to exceed $9,650,000 for the prior lawful expenditure of funds relating to constructing various capital improvements to City property, which Resolution is duly of record in the minutes of said City Council, and said meeting was open to the public, and public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given, all as required by Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. EXECUTED UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL of said City, this the 24th day of January, 2017. City Secretary (CITY SEAL) 82492512.2 S-2 That the foregoing resolution was read and passed finally on this the 24th day of January, 2017, by the following vote: Dan McQueen Rudy Garza Carolyn Vaughn Paulette Guajardo Ben Molina Michael Hunter Lucy Rubio Joe McComb Greg Smith PASSED AND APPROVED, this the 24th day of January, 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta Dan McQueen City Secretary Mayor 82492512.2 S-3 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of January 17, 2017 Action Item for City Council Meeting January 24, 2017 DATE: 11/21/2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager THROUGH: E. Jay Ellington, Interim Assistant City Manager JayEll@cctexas.com 361-826-3042pass FROM: Rudy Bentancourt, Director of Housing and Community Development RudyB@cctexas.com 361-826-3021 Resolution approving a Homebuyer Assistance Program agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and the City of Corpus Christi. CAPTION: Resolution approving an agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and the City of Corpus Christi for Type A Affordable Housing Program — Homebuyer Assistance Program in the amount of $107,500; and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute said agreement. PURPOSE: The purpose of the resolution is to approve an agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation (Type A Board) and the City of Corpus Christi for the Homebuyer Assistance Program which is administered by the Housing and Community Development Department. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: During the September 19, 2016 Type A Board Meeting, the Board approved a motion to transfer $100,000 into the Homebuyer Assistance Program. During the same Type A Board Meeting, the Board approved the transfer of $7,500 into the City of CC -Reimbursement line item under the Type A Board Affordable Housing Program. Also motioned on this date was an approval to enter into an agreement between the Type A Board and the City of Corpus Christi for the administration and management of the Homebuyer Assistance Program. The agreement covers the term from October 1, 2016 to March 31, 2017, whereas the Board will receive quarterly updates regarding the Homebuyer Assistance Program. The total amount covered by the agreement is $107,500. The Homebuyer Assistance Program provides low- and moderate -income individuals and families with a grant up to $10,000 for the down payment of a single family residence. ALTERNATIVES: None OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not Applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Not Applicable EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: This item is non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal Housing and Community Development FINANCIAL IMPACT: Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item $107,500 $107,500 BALANCE $107,500 $107,500 Fund(s): Comments: Financial Impact will be on the funding of the Type A Board funding. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation and the City of Corpus Christi. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Agreement with Exhibit A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI FOR TYPE A AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM — HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM IN THE AMOUNT OF $107,500; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, the Board of the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation (the "Board") has approved a Type A Affordable Housing Program - Homebuyer Assistance Program, which it funds; WHEREAS, the City through its Housing and Community Development Department ("Department") manages several programs to assist eligible citizens with affordable housing; WHEREAS, the City is willing to provide the services that the Board wishes to fund and has provided these services in the past for the Board; WHEREAS, the Board approved a six-month agreement between the City and the Corporation for the management of its program on at the Board's meeting on September 19, 2016. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The attached agreement between the City and the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Board in the amount of $107,500 is approved. SECTION 2. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute an amended agreement between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Board and the City for the Type A Affordable Housing Program — Homebuyer Assistance Program. Adopted this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Dan McQueen Mayor Page 1 of 2 Corpus Christi, Texas of The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Dan McQueen Rudy Garza Paulette Guajardo Michael Hunter Joe McComb Ben Molina Lucy Rubio Greg Smith Carolyn Vaughn Page 2 of 2 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS AND JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI FOR TYPE A AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM — HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM This Agreement for the Type A Affordable Housing Program — Homebuyer Assistance Program ("Agreement") is entered into between the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation ("Corporation") and the City of Corpus Christi ("City"), a Texas home rule municipality. WHEREAS, the Texas Legislature in Section 501 of the Local Government Code (Development Corporation Act of 1979) empowered local communities with the ability to adopt an optional local sales and use tax as a means of improving the economic health and prosperity of their citizens; WHEREAS, on November 5, 2002, residents of the City passed Proposition 2, New and Expanded Business Enterprises, which authorized the adoption of a sales and use tax for the promotion and development of new and expanded business enterprises at the rate of one-eighth of one percent to be imposed for 15 years; WHEREAS, in the same election, the residents of the City passed Proposition 2B, Affordable Housing, which authorized the use of a portion of the sales and use tax approved under Proposition 2 for affordable housing, up to $500,000 annually, so long as there are projects for which the amount can reasonably be used; WHEREAS, the 1/8 cent sales tax authorized by passage of Proposition 2 and allocated under Proposition 2B for affordable housing was subsequently enacted by the City's City Council ("City Council") and filed with the State Comptroller of Texas, effective April 1, 2003, to be administered by the Corporation's Board of Directors ("Board"); WHEREAS, the Board wishes to fund affordable housing projects in an effective manner; WHEREAS, the City through its Housing and Community Development Department ("Department") manages several programs to assist eligible citizens with affordable housing; WHEREAS, the City is willing to provide the services that the Board wishes to fund and has provided these services in the past for the Board; WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is in the best interests of the residents of the City that the City be awarded affordable housing funds, by execution of this Agreement, to accomplish the affordable housing project described in Exhibit "A" of this Agreement ("Project"); In consideration of the covenants, promises, and conditions stated in this Agreement, the Corporation and the City agree as follows: 1. Agreement to Provide Affordable Housing Services. This Agreement between the Corporation and the City is executed to implement the promotion and development of an affordable housing project described in Exhibit "A" and incorporated in this Agreement by reference. The parties have approved this Agreement in an amount not to exceed $107,500, of which up to $7,500 will reimburse City for staff time in implementing the Project. The parties have agreed that $100,000 will be used to Page 1 of 8 implement the Project and to process applications from the citizens for funds under the Project. In addition to the $100,000 funded by this agreement, the parties agree that the City will use any funds left over from the previous agreement for this program, which expires on September 30, 2016, to implement the Project and to process applications from the citizens for funds under the Project. The funds provided under this agreement may not be used for any other projects or to reimburse the City for any staff time which is unrelated to this Project. Any funds not used for the implementation of the Project will be returned to the Corporation. 2. Reimbursement Process. The Parties agree that the Department will request reimbursement for staff time on a quarterly basis. Requests for reimbursement shall be submitted to the Executive Director of the Board. Reimbursement requests shall list the number of homebuyers who received funds under the Project, the total number of applicants, the number of hours spent reviewing and processing applications, and the hourly rate at which the staff time is charged. Reimbursement requests containing all of the required information shall be processed within 30 days. 3. Quarterly Updates. At the Board's meeting following the end of each quarter, the Director of the Department, or designee, will present an update on the program to the Board. The update will include the number of loans processed, the number of applicants, and the number of hours spent reviewing and processing loan applications during the preceding quarter. 4. Effective Date. The effective date of this Program Agreement is the date on which the City Council grants approval to the Corporation for this Project, so long as all parties have executed this Agreement. 5. Term. The term of this Agreement is from October 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017. 6. Termination. Either party may terminate this Agreement by giving at least 30 days' written notice to the other of its intent to terminate. In the event of such termination, the City will be entitled to reimbursement for any staff time spent reviewing and processing applications under the Project prior to the effective date of the termination. 7. Amendments or Modifications. No amendments or modifications to this Agreement or to the Project may be made, nor any provision waived, unless the amendment or modification is made in writing and signed by persons duly authorized to sign agreements on behalf of all parties. 8. Notices. a. Any required written notices shall be sent, certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: If to Corporation: City of Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation Attn: President, R. Bryan Gulley 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Page2of8 If to City: City of Corpus Christi Attn.: Director of Housing and Community Development Department P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 City of Corpus Christi Attn.: City Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 c. Notice is effective upon deposit in the United States mail in the manner provided above. 9. Relationship of Parties. In performing this Agreement, the Corporation and the City shall act in an individual capacity, and not as agents, representatives, employees, employers, partners, joint - venturers, or associates of one another. The employees or agents of either party may not be, nor be construed to be, the employees or agents of the other party for any purpose. CORPUS CHRISTI BUSINESS & JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION R. Bryan Gulley President Date: ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta E. Jay Ellington City Secretary Interim Assistant City Manager Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: .0 (J&,MA f7f-e,e) "MAP lG Aimee Alcorn -Reed Assistant City Attorney Attorney for Corporation 1 111 Yv- a Agui Assistant City Attorney Attorney for City Housing and Community Development Page 3 of 8 City of Corpus Christi Exhibit A Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation TYPE A Affordable Housing — Homebuyer Assistance Program Guidelines for the Program and Criteria for Application REVISED 09/01/16 Page 4 of 8 Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation TYPE A Homebuyer Assistance Program Guidelines for the Program and Criteria for Application I. Purpose The purpose of the program is to expand affordable housing opportunities for low income homebuyers by providing a deferred forgivable loan to be utilized for down payment assistance to buy down the purchase price of the home, 11. General Program Description: The funding is available to qualified homebuyers for the purpose of providing down payment assistance a deferred forgivable loan to buy down the purchase price of an affordable home. Affordable housing is any house with a purchase price which does not exceed 95% of the Metropolitan Statistical Area as determined by HUD, which is currently $162,000 for 2016. The intent is to provide general terms/guidelines in order to accomplish the buy down of the purchase price to make the home affordable for households with incomes in the 80% of median income ranges (see Attachment A, 80% of Median Income Chart). The funding will be in the form of a deferred forgivable loan for up to $10,000. The term of affordability will be 5 years. The loan will be amortized over the specified affordability period, commencing on the closure date, and forgiven at a rate of $2,000 per year for every year the homebuyer lives in the house. Should the homebuyer move out before the affordability period ends, then the remaining period will be prorated and must be paid back. Recapture provisions require repayment of the total loan amount on a prorated basis. If the buyer sells the property within the affordability period, the balance of the amortized loan shall be due and payable. The funding is available on a first come, first serve basis. 111. Housing Standards: The home must pass a Housing Quality Standards (HQS) inspection, which is conducted by HCD staff. If the house was build prior to 1978, a lead based paint test inspection will be required in accordance with HUD Lead Based Paint Regulations. The house cannot be located in a 100 year flood plain. Per 24 CFR Part 55: Properties located within the 100 year floodplain are vulnerable to a 1 00 -year flood, and a 1 percent chance of a flood occurring every year. IV. Homebuyer Eligibility: Prospective homebuyers shall meet the gross annual income limits adjusted for family size as determined by HUD (see Attachment A). The Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) will determine the applicant's anticipated annual gross income. Anticipated annual gross income is an estimation of future income a purchasing household expects to receive based upon their current and future monthly income annualized over a 12 month period. Some examples of future income are bonuses, pay raises, commissions or over time. Homebuyers must attend a HUD approved Homebuyer/Homeownership class to obtain a Homebuyer Education Certificate. The certificate cannot be older than one year from the date of issue, and cannot be obtained from an Page 5 of 8 online class. If two or more persons are buying a home together, all must attend a class and provide a copy of the Homebuyer Education Certificate. HUD Approved Housing Counseling Agencies can be found here: http://www.hud1 ,ciov/offices/hsg/sfh/hcc/hcs.cfm The purchasing household size will be determined by the Housing and Community Development Department using HUD's definition of purchasing household. Purchasing household includes all persons who will be occupying the units as their permanent residence. A member of a household is considered to a permanent member of the household if they have been living as a member of the household for at least six months or more. Homebuyer's cash on hand cannot exceed program limits. Housing and Community Development will make a determination of eligibility at the time the mortgage lender submits the required documents listed in section (V. Lender Requirements) below. The homebuyer will be issued a Commitment Letter review and approval of all required submitted documents. The Commitment Letter will expire 6 months from the date of issuance. At the time of application, the homebuyer cannot have ownership in any property. The housing ratio ("front end ratio") must fall between 28%-32% The total debt ratio ("back end ratio") may not exceed 45% V. Lender Requirements: The Lender will be required to submit the following to HCD: o Loan Estimate Form o Lender pre -qualification o Signed and dated 1003 o Escrow Earnest Money Contract (sales price cannot exceed $162,000) o Three months of the most recent bank statements o Paycheck stubs for past 3 months o Government issued identification for all purchasing household members o Copy of social security card of all members of the household o Copy of the Homebuyer Education Certificate (no older than one year from date of issue) o Underwriter Summary (1008) — to be provided prior to HCD issuing the Commitment Letter o Title Commitment showing the 1St and 2nd Liens (upon final loan approval) o Closing Disclosure (upon final loan approval) VI. Title Company Requirements: HCD will give the approval for closing and will wire funds to the Title Company. Page 6 of 8 The Title Company will provide to HCD the original signed promissory note, the recorded City of Corpus Christi Deed of Trust, Recorded Warranty Deed, Final signed Closing Disclosure, Insurance Binder which shows all liens, and the Title Policy which shows HCD as a lien holder. The Title Company will be responsible for ensuring that all documents are complete and correct. Page 7 of 8 INCOME LIMITS (80% of MEDIAN INCOME) FAMILY SIZE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ANNUAL INCOME 32,500 37,200 41,850 46,500 50,250 53,950 57,700 61,400 Zevised 3/28/2016* Income limits are established by HUD and are subiect to change without notice Page8of8 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of January 17, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 DATE: January 11, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager MarkVV@cctexas.com (361) 826-3082 FROM: Valerie H. Gray, P.E., Executive Director, Public Works ValerieG@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 CAPTION: J. H. Edmonds, P.E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Fred Segundo, Director of Aviation FredS@cctexas.com (361) 289-0171 Engineering Construction Contract Corpus Christi International Airport (CCIA) Runway 18-36 and Associated Work Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with GL Contracting / Double Rafter H Construction Company, LLC. — Joint Venture of San Antonio, Texas in the amount of $1,094,167.18 for the CCIA Runway 18-36 and Associated Work for the Base Bid (Asphalt Option) with a 90/10% respective share of contract costs between the FAA and the City. PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is to obtain authority to execute a construction contract with GL Contracting / Double Rafter H Construction Company, LLC. — Joint Venture of San Antonio, Texas for the CCIA Runway 18-36 and Associated Work. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: This is a joint Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)/City project with a respective 90/10 percent construction cost sharing. The project includes drainage improvements at one of the antenna sites and rehabilitation and maintenance of multiple taxiways at CCIA. The drainage improvements are critical to ensure continued operations of antenna pad and equipment. Several taxiways and a section of Runway 18 are showing distresses that need to be corrected to avoid disruptions to operations and major reconstruction cost. The project includes construction and installation of a trench drain and PVC drain pipe at the Runway 18- 36 localizer antenna pad, rehabilitation of the Taxiway Alpha pavement, and crack seal of Runway 18/36 and Taxiways Alpha, Al, A2, A3, A4, Mike, November, Papa, and Quebec. These taxiway and drainage improvements service both commercial and private aviation. The project was bid with two (2) base bids options in an effort to maximize contractor competition. As a result of asphalt material supply issues experienced in September 2016 and limited airport contractors, there was concern that a sole bid would be received. The FAA looks unfavorably on sole bid projects and requires an extensive agency review, resulting in project delays. The FAA was consulted on the approach and concurred with the two bid option. Therefore, the bid documents were developed allowing two base bids; Base Bid A was for Hot Mix Asphaltic Concrete Pavement (HMAC), and Base Bid B was for Portland Cement Concrete Pavement (PCC). Base Bid A. HMAC is classified as a flexible pavement that matches the existing taxiways. The selection of HMAC is primarily based on the clay subgrade (soils) in Corpus Christi. The clay soils routinely shrink and expand with the wet and dry seasons. The flexible pavement (HMAC surface and limestone base) allows greater shrinkage and expansion without causing premature stress and failure to the pavement. HMAC also requires less joints and potential bumps that improve the ride quality and function for aviation activities. Base Bid B. PCC is classified as a rigid pavement. The existing taxiway is constructed using Asphalt. As a result introducing a dissimilar pavement will pose additional maintenance challenges. The dissimilar materials and their different expansion rates cause cracking at the interface and elsewhere. Also, the rigid pavement will be subject to premature cracking and failures due to excessive shrinkage and expansion with clay soils. This option was developed primarily to increase competition. The FAA and Staff are recommending the award of Base Bid A with HMAC based on the material performance of the existing taxiways and runways. Both runways and all associated taxiways are HMAC. Converting small sections of the taxiways to PCC will create more complex maintenance practices will be more expensive and labor intensive to maintain. The two -bid approach resulted in 3 bids for the project where we might have otherwise received a sole bid. On October 19, 2016, the City received proposals from three (3) bidders. All 3 bidders were deemed responsive. The bidders are as follows: Contractor Base Bid Asphalt Option Base Bid Concrete Option GL Contracting / Double Rafter H Construction Company, LLC. Joint Venture San Antonio, Texas $1,094,167.18 $864,937.87 Bay, LTD. Corpus Christi, Texas $1,301,042.13 $1,374,592.55 SpawGlass Civic Construction Houston, Texas $1,375,792.42 $1,233,492.41 Engineer's Estimate $1,001,492.00 $1,000,000.00 The City's Engineer, KSA Engineers, evaluated the three (3) bids and determined that GL Contracting / Double Rafter H Construction Company, LLC. Joint Venture was the lowest responsive bidder. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize execution of the construction contract. (Recommended) 2. Do not authorize execution of the construction contract. (Not Recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: The engineering consultant, KSA Engineers (KSA), previously designed portions of this project in association with other projects. KSA was selected for this project under RFQ 2015-09. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Conforms to statutes regarding construction procurement criteria; §2, Article 10 of the City Charter regarding contracts; FY 2016-2017 Airport Capital Improvement Planning (CIP) Budget. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Aviation FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS CIP Budget $1,404,026.90 $1,404,026.90 Encumbered / Expended Amount This item 1,094,167.18 1,094,167.18 Future Anticipated Expenditures This Project 309,859.72 309,859.72 BALANCE $0.00 $0.00 Fund(s): Airport Fund Reserves and FAA Grant, CIP 2016-2017, AV 02 & AV 03 RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends that a construction contract be executed with GL Contracting / Double Rafter H Construction Company, LLC. — Joint Venture of San Antonio, Texas in the amount of $1,094,167.18 for the Base Bid (Asphalt Option). LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Project Budget Location Map Presentation Form 1295 PROJECT BUDGET ESTIMATE CCIA Runway 18-36 and Associated Work Project No. E15222 FUNDS AVAILABLE: Airport Fund Reserves 427,509 FAA Grant 976,518 TOTAL 1,404,027 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction (GL Contracting & DRH Construction JV) This Item Base Bid 1,094,167 Contingencies (10%) 109,417 Construction Materials Inspection and Testing: A/E Consultant (KSA Engineers) 96,443 Construction Inspection 42,900 Construction Material Testing 7,500 Construction Survey 6,843 Construction Administration 39,200 Design: A/E Consultant (KSA Engineers) 32,000 Preliminary Engineering Design 0 Engineering Design (KSA Small Contract) 32,000 Reimbursements• 72,000 Administration/Finance (Capital Programs/Capital Budget/Finance) 23,000 Engineering Services (Project Mgt/Constr Mgt) 47,500 Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 1,500 TOTAL 1,404,027 ESTIMATED PROJECT BALANCE 0 Corpus Christi A Petro i Ia Tierra G::, ncI s LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE I::1 -e rn— r Pr❑ IIDENEE ❑❑r: E1 ❑222 CCIA Runway 18-36 and Associated Work CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES CCIA CORPUS CHRISTI INTERNATI( . _ Corpus Christi International Airport Runway 18-36 and Associated Work (*Corpus Engineering Council Presentation January 17, 2017 Location Map Corpus Christi International Airport Runway 18-36 and Associated Work olet ® at 51 Corpus Christi / Internatoonal Airport• 49A e65 Imo] n mus Christi C) Corpus Chrsti Engineering 2 Project Scope Ar -i* Corpus Christi Engineering SH 44 (AgnesSt.) Proposed Trench Drain Proposed Reconstruction Proposed Crack Searing Proposed Panel Rehabilitation RUNWAY 18-36 Corpus Christi (aim -national Airport Proposed Crack Sealing or Joint City / FAA Project for Runway 18-36 and Associated Work Activities include: • Construction and installation of trench and PVC pipe drain at Runway 18-36 localizer antenna pad • Excavation and Reconstruction of Taxiway Alpha pavement • Crack seal of Runway 18-36 and adjacent taxiways Project Schedule Corpus Chrsti Engineering 2016 2017 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Design Nov Dec Jan Bid / Award Feb Mar Apr May Jun Construction Project Estimate: 160 Calendar Days 5 Months CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-142993 Date Filed: 12/05/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. GL Contracting & DRH Construction JV San Antonio , TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City 01 Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E15222 Work will consist of the construction and installation of a trench drain and PVC drain pipe at the Runway 36 Iocalizer pad; rehabilitation of Taxiway Alpha pavement; and the crack seal of Runway 18 an 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary GL Contracting & DRH Construction JV San Antonio, TX United States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. ❑ 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. I \\NI!/!/ �`,*r•i'k� RITA K. DIETZ ;°: jt E Notary Public. State of Texas y� �jyta- �^►1, ` Comm. Expires 09-17-2018 Not22....2.V,2;24336316 .4at.1 _ a Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity At-PrATILITARTS.) 7{M t*L ISLIVE Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said • @Oh rt el 9.. Vo rnQ S , this the 44''' day 0f CeV►tibe r 201 �p , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. V.. ?Nki)... V Signature of officer administering oath nted name of officer administering oath Title of officer administ ing oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.277 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of January 17, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 DATE: December 27, 2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager MarkVV@cctexas.com (361) 826-3082 Valerie H. Gray, P.E., Executive Director, Public Works ValerieG@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: Dan Grimsbo, Interim Director of Water and Utilities DanG©cctexas.com (361) 826-1718 Jeffrey H. Edmonds, P.E., Director, Engineering Services JeffreyE©cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Enqineerinq Construction Contract City -Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) Program (Capital Improvement Program) CAPTION: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with IPR South Central LLC of Pasadena, Texas in the amount of $4,000,000 for the City -Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Program (ID/IQ) for the Total Base Bid. The initial contract is anticipated as a two (2) year (730 calendar days) base contract, with three (3) optional one (1) year (365 calendar days) extensions subject to availability of funding and satisfactory contractor performance. The optional contract extension will not exceed an amount of $2,000,000 per year and will be administratively authorized by the City Manager or designee based on available funding. (Capital Improvement Program) PURPOSE: The purpose of this agenda item is to obtain authority to execute a construction contract for the City -Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation ID/IQ Program for the Total Base Bid. CIP DESCRIPTION: City -Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation ID/IQ Program The City -Wide ID/IQ Program is a long-term initiative designed to reduce the number and volume of sanitary sewer overflows within the City. It is a key component of the life cycle program to address collection system conveyance and manhole infrastructure requirements with the City. The program will identify, prioritize and implement specific capital improvements projects in a phased design and construction approach to extend the service life, improve flows, improve water quality, reduce overflows and cave-ins and reduce long-term maintenance costs. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The City has had a number of reported sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) over the last several years. In 2013, City staff initiated a City -Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation ID/IQ Program to identify, prioritize and re -capitalize the aging sanitary sewer collection system and to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows and infiltration. The contract method of ID/IQ program provides for multiple delivery orders (DOs) — "work orders" based on unit bid prices. This allows real time construction scoping with fixed unit prices. This program is critical to improve operational and maintenance cost and reduce overflows. This is the second program cycle to provide continued ID/IQ construction for the wastewater collection system. The scope of work includes, but is not limited to: rehabilitation and/or replacement of manholes, rehabilitation and/or replacement of gravity collection lines and/or force mains by open -cut method, cured -in-place pipe, and/or pipe bursting for lines up to 36 - inches in diameter, gravity line point repairs, dewatering through well pointing, control of wastewater flows through bypass pumping, cleaning and televised inspection of conduits, as needed Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)/permit compliance (subsidiary), and temporary traffic controls. On November 16, 2016, the City received proposals from three (3) bidders and the respective bids were as follows: CONTRACTOR TOTAL BASE BID IPR South Central LLC Pasadena, Texas $6,931,212.50 CPC Interests, LLC dba Clark Pipeline Services Corpus Christi, Texas 10,328,211.00 National Power Rodding Corporation Austin, Texas 12,891,398.95 Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost $4,000,000.00 The City analyzed the three proposals and recommended the project be awarded to IPR South Central LLC. Based on a review of IPR South Central's experience and resources, IPR South Central LLC is qualified to provide the construction services for the project. Based on the City's Capital Improvement Program funds availability, the total amount of this construction contract is $4,000,000. This project will be executed by multiple indefinite quantity DOs as required by the City, in accordance with the plans, specifications, and contract documents. The construction cost of each DO will be calculated through the fixed unit bid prices. The initial contract is anticipated as a two (2) year (730 calendar days) base contract, with three (3) optional one (1) year (365 calendar days) extensions subject to availability of funding and satisfactory contractor performance. The optional contract extension will not exceed an amount of $2,000,000 per year and will be administratively authorized by the City Manager or designee based on available funding. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the execution of the construction contract. (Recommended) 2. Do not authorize the execution of the construction contract. (Not Recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: This project is part of the Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) program. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Conforms to City Fiscal Policy. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Utilities Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ®Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Project to Date Expenditures Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget (CIP) 12,000,000 12,000,000 Encumbered / Expended Amount This Item 4,000,000 4,000,000 Future Anticipated Expenditures This Project 7,592,500 7,592,500 BALANCE 407,500 407,500 Fund(s): Wastewater CIP #2 Comments: This project requires approximately 730 days for construction with anticipated completion in February 2019. The construction contract will result in the expenditure of an amount not to exceed $4,000,000. RECOMMENDATION: City Staff recommends approval of a construction contract with IPR South Central LLC of Pasadena, Texas in the amount of $4,000,000 for the City -Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation ID/IQ Program for the Total Base Bid. The initial contract is anticipated as a two (2) year (730 calendar days) base contract, with three (3) optional one (1) year (365 calendar days) extensions subject to availability of funding and satisfactory contractor performance. The optional contract extension will not exceed an amount of $2,000,000 per year and will be administratively authorized by the City Manager or designee based on available funding. (Capital Improvement Program) LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Project Budget Location Map Presentation Form 1295 PROJECT BUDGET City -Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Program FUNDS AVAILABLE: Wastewater CIP (FY 2016-2017) $12,000,000 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction: Year 1&2 CW Collection System ID/IQ Program (IPR South Central LLC) THIS ITEM 4,000,000 Contingency (10%) 400,000 Year 2 for Pipebursting Part A (Renewal) 3,750,000 Contingency (10%) 375,000 Year 2 for Pipebursting Part B (Renewal) 1,875,000 Contingency (10%) 187,500 Construction Observation & Testing: Construction Observation Estimate (TBD) 240,000 Construction Materials Testing Estimate (TBD) 90,000 $ 10,587,500 330,000 Reimbursements for all contracts: Total Reimbursements. 675,000 Contract Administration (Engineering Svcs Admin/Capital Budget/Finance) 150,000 Engineering Services (Project Mgmt/Constr Mgmt) 250,000 Engineer (Design In -House) 250,000 Misc 25,000 TOTAL $11,592,500 PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE $407,500 Morgan Farm Area tJ Sinton Rancho Chico Del Sol -Loma Linde 181 Taft Doyle Portland own Petronila 358 4°J Tradewinds Gregory;, Ingleside Cil.y-Ey- I t Falmar Cre.l�l'Y Ares Aransas Pass Ingleside on the Bay City -Wide C ❑d R I❑d d R Pr D Tierra Grande Ilarr,r' r 5 Bring Bland iss Mustin i�Jan gate LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE Pr❑I I [W❑❑ ❑Er- E162❑❑ City -Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Program CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Carpus Chr sti Engineering City -Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation Indefinite Delivery/ Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) Program Council Presentation January 17, 2017 Project Location Irdesitle o�9hP P:v City -Wide Collection System Replacement and Rehabilitation Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Program Tien Gr Aransas vase t, Corpus Chr'sti Engineering 2 Project Scope Corpus Chr sti Engineering This is the second cycle of the City's Wastewater ID/IQ Program to identify, prioritize and re -capitalize the aging sanitary sewer collection system and to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows and infiltration. Major activities include: • Rehabilitation and/or replacement of manholes • Rehabilitation and/or replacement of gravity collection lines and/or force mains • Gravity line point repairs • Dewatering through well pointing • Control of wastewater flows through bypass pumping • Cleaning and televised inspection of conduits • Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) • Temporary traffic controls Project Schedule Carpus Chr sti Engineering 2016 2017 2018 N D J Bid & Award F M A M J J A s 0 N D J F M A M J J A s 0 N D J Construction Project Construction Estimate: 730 Calendar Days = 2 Years Schedule reflects City Council construction award in January 2017 with completion planned by February 2019 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are Interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. r- — OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. IPR South Central LLC Pasadena, TX United States Certificate Number: 2016-147876 Date Filed: 2 Name or governmental entity or State agency that is a party to the contract for which the form Is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 12/20/2016 Date Acknowledged: 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E16255 City -Wide Wastewater Collection System ID/IQ Program FY16 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary Inland Pipe Rehabilitation, LLC The Woodlands, TX United States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under {h NOTAftY PUBLIC, STATE OF TEXAS i} MY COMMISSION penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. rj jJUETAJQUINTANA1l EXPIRES tit Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity 14.'-x'-' JUNE 11, 2019 l AF .+srrr Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said Bac Ong . this the 20th day of December 2016 , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. \''', .--.4„.,,....„(______ ..3,ki,,,,, eArA T k.) Ak-oilk U6 k , k_ Signature of offi r administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering am Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1,0.277 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of January 17, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 DATE: December 28, 2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager markvv@cctexas.com (361) 826-3897 Valerie H. Gray, P. E., Executive Director of Public Works valerieg@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: J. H. Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 CAPTION: Engineering Construction Contract Greenwood Drive Storm Water Improvements Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Clark Pipeline Services, LLC. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $469,401.98 for the Greenwood Drive Storm Water Improvements. PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is to obtain authority to execute a construction contract for the Greenwood Drive Storm Water Improvements at the Hector P. Garcia Park. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: This project is required to support the drainage improvements in the Bond 2012 Greenwood Drive (Gollihar Rd to Horne Rd) project. In July 2016, City Council awarded the Bond 2012 Greenwood Street Reconstruction project to Haas Anderson Construction that is currently under construction. The storm water improvements in the Greenwood Drive street reconstruction project and this project will improve the overall drainage for the street and immediate neighborhoods. The existing drainage from the Greenwood corridor is collected into the storm water system though the curb inlets along Greenwood Drive and into the underground storm water trunk main. The trunk main discharges to 5'x5' concrete box outfall structure that extends from Greenwood Drive across the Hector P. Garcia Park and into Airport Ditch. The improvements in the Greenwood Drive Street Reconstruction project increases the collection and flows along the corridor into the system and therefore need for an additional outfall. This project constructs a parallel outfall structure to increase conveyance to the Airport Ditch. The new parallel outfall structure is a 1,205 linear foot 60 -inch High Density Polypropylene Pipe (HDPP) extending from Greenwood Drive to the Airport Ditch. The new outfall will connect to a new junction box that is constructed in the Greenwood Drive Street Reconstruction project. This project was bid separate from the Greenwood Drive Street Reconstruction project because the new HDPP crosses an existing closed landfill used for household garbage. The work plan for potential disturbance was submitted to and approved by Texas Commission for Environmental Quality (TCEQ). Construction includes special excavation and backfill requirements. The project is planned for 120 -Days of construction. On November 30, 2016, the City received proposals from four (4) bidders and the bids are as follows: Contractor Base Bid Clark Pipeline Services, LLC Corpus Christi, Texas $469,401.98 Bay, Ltd. Corpus Christi, Texas $614,901.55 Bridges Specialties, Inc. Robstown, Texas $753,657.06 Black Castle General Contractor New Braunfels, Texas $780,233.00 Engineer's Estimate $462,000.00 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize execution of a construction contract. 2. Do not authorize execution of a construction contract. (Not Recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Govind Development, LLC. is the engineer that was selected for this project under RFQ 2012-03. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Complies with statutory requirements for construction contracts. Conforms to FY 2016-2017 Capital Improvement Planning (CIP) Budget. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Street Department Utility Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue X Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Budget $614,558.00 $614,558.00 This item 469,401.98 469,401.98 Future Anticipated Expenditures This Project 80,875.00 80,875.00 BALANCE $64,281.02 $64,281.02 Fund(s): Comments: N/A RECOMMENDATION: City staff and Govind Development, LLC. recommend the award to Clark Pipeline Services, LLC. in the amount of $469,401.98 for Greenwood Drive Storm Water Improvements project. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Project Budget Location Map Presentation Form 1295 PROJECT BUDGET ESTIMATE Greenwood Drive Storm Water Improvements PROJECT FUNDS AVAILABLE: Storm Water CIP 614,558 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $ 614,558 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction Fees 469,402 Construction (Clark Pipeline) THIS ITEM 469,402 Contingency (10%) 46,940 Construction Inspection and Testing Fees 27,264 Construction Inspection (Estimate) 17,020 Construction Phase - Materials Testing Services (Rock) 10,244 Design Fees 19,050 *Engineering Design (Govind) 19,050 Reimbursement Fees 34,561 Contract Administration (Eng. Svcs Admin/Finance/Capital Budget) 12,908 Engineering Services (Project Mgt/Constr Mgt) 20,653 Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 1,000 TOTAL $ 550,277 ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE $ 64,281 * Design work occurred under the Greenwood Drive Bond 2012 Project. PrLIIII__LLII I W Pnint Rd villarreill Dr 41, a oo €03 Monger! AVE 185 0-* LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE"' Corp ri 286 c1t rjj 01 (T. L. 'Roe CD GC/ 434, .91 -V21- PrE111111NEE E16A6 Greenwood Drive Storm Water Improvements (Hector P. Garcia Park) CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Corpus Chr sti Engineering Greenwood Drive Storm Water Improvements (Hector P. Garcia Park) Council Presentation January 17, 2017 Project Location �hrsti Engineering 445.11 S[ Hopkins NI Greenwood Drive Storm Water Improvements (Hector P. Garcia Park) W PV.! t ae L> _ Cor. Christi AB�a St Margan are v d C''o,,RGv h'a ¢Q 3 '4a 2 Project Vicinity �hrsti Engineering Airport Ditch7........--- (Discharge) Project Scope �hrsti Engineering This project creates a new parallel drainage outfall structure to improve the overall drainage along the Greenwood Corridor from Gollihar to Horne. The project is necessary as a result of drainage improvement in the Greenwood Drive Street Reconstruction Bond 2012 Proposition 1 project. The work includes: • Construct a new 60" high density polypropylene pipe (HDPP) from Greenwood to the Airport Ditch across Hector P. Garcia Park • New concrete outfall structure on Airport Ditch • Renovations to restore the Hector P. Garcia Park • Disposal of excess excavation at Cefe Valenzuela Landfill (City) • Volatile organic compound (VOC) monitoring ❖ This project required a TCEQ approval of the work plan for monitoring, handling, hauling and disposal for the excavations across the closed landfill site at the Hector P. Garcia Park 4 Project Schedule �hrsti Engineering 2016 2017 Nov Dec Jan Bid/Award Feb Mar Apr May Construction 11 Project Estimate: Calendar Days 120 4 Months CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. CPC Interests LLC dba Clark Pipeline Services Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi FORM 1295 1 of 1 OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-142787 Date Filed: 12/05/2016 Date Acknowledged: 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E16316 Greenwood Drive Storm Water Improvements 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Con Nature of interest (check applicable} trolling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. 6 AFFIDAVIT CNA 130142Aws kiw Notary AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. authoriz 20 -� 'S p1 CA 6,v- 20 , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. Signature of officer admin to ing oath vvc, c\at4L4 kj Printed name of officer administering oath eri Teontracting buyLiness entity this the day of ) (rtl. r v' P Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.eth ics.state.tx. us Version V1.0,277 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of January 17, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 DATE: January 17, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Dan Grimsbo, Interim Director of Utilities DanG c(�cctexas.com (361) 826-1718 Maria Pedraza, Procurement Manager mariape(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-3176 Supply Agreement for Liquid Caustic Soda Solution CAPTION: Resolution rejecting all initial bids submitted for the purchase of liquid caustic soda ("chemical"); finding that the purchase of the chemical is necessary to preserve and protect the public health and safety of the City's residents; obtaining pricing through competitive solicitation; and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a one- year supply contract for the chemical with Univar of Kent, Washington, in an amount not to exceed $1,362,882.00, of which an estimated expenditure of $908,588.00 in FY2016- 2017 is funded by the Water Fund, and includes up to four one-year renewals. PURPOSE: The O.N. Stevens Department uses Liquid Caustic Soda, also known as sodium hydroxide aqueous to adjust the pH of the water treated. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Liquid caustic soda solution, also known as sodium hydroxide aqueous solution is currently utilized at the O. N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant for pH adjustment of the final filter effluent to raise the pH of the water. By raising the pH, a more stable environment is created for monochloramine residuals, and the higher pH also keeps City water from being corrosive to the distribution piping system. The City received three bids and three no bids for the purchase of the chemical under RFB 185; however there were anomalies in the bids from all bidders that would prevent the City from making a successful award that was in the best interest of the City. In order to protect the health and safety of the City's residents, the City issued a post bid addendum 185A to allow all six participating bidders an opportunity to rebid the work, and a revised specification and instructions were issued. The City received three responsive bids from the original participating bidders and is recommending the award to the lowest, responsive, responsible bidder, Univar of Kent, Washington in an amount not to exceed $1,362,882 ALTERNATIVES: None OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This purchase conforms to the City's purchasing policies and procedures and State statutes regulating procurement. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Utilities Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $5,216,252.15 $454,294.00 $5,670,546.15 Encumbered / Expended Amount $3,239,587.23 $0.00 $3,239,587.23 This item $908,588.00 $454,294.00 $1,362,882.00 BALANCE $1,068,076.92 $0.00 $1,068,076.92 Fund(s): Water Comments: The initial contract term is a total amount not to exceed $1,362,882, with an estimated expenditure of $908,588 to be funded in FY2016-2017. The total estimated contract value will be $6,814,410 if all options years are executed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Bid Tabulation Resolution Supply Agreement CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION BUYER: Lydia Juarez Supplier BID TABULATION - 185A Liquid Caustic Soda January 4, 2017 Recorded by: Lydia Juarez Supplier Supplier TOTAL: $1,362,882.00 $1,534,125.00 $1,425,850.00 Univar USA, Inc Brenntag Southwest, Inc DPC Industries Kent, Washington Houston, Texas Corpus Christi, Texas Unit Extended Unit Extended Unit Extended Item Description Qty. Unit Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 50% Liquid Caustic Soda in accordance with specifications for Water Treating Chemicals 5000 Wet Ton $ 230.625 $1,153,125.00 $256.500 $ 1,282,500.00 $ 242.900 $ 1,214,500.00 2 25% Liquid Caustic Soda in accordance with specifications for Water Treating Chemicals 1500 Wet Ton $ 139.838 $209,757.00 $167.750 $ 251,625.00 $ 140.900 $ 211,350.00 TOTAL: $1,362,882.00 $1,534,125.00 $1,425,850.00 Resolution rejecting all initial bids submitted for the purchase of liquid caustic soda ("chemical"); finding that the purchase of the chemical is necessary to preserve and protect the public health and safety of the City's residents; obtaining pricing through competitive solicitation; and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a one-year supply contract for the chemical with Univar of Kent, Washington, in an amount not to exceed $1,362,882.00, of which an estimated expenditure of $908,588.00 in FY2016-2017 is funded by the Water Fund, and includes up to four one-year renewals. WHEREAS, Texas Local Government Code, Section 252.022(a)(2), provides: "(a) This chapter does not apply to an expenditure for:... (2) a procurement necessary to preserve or protect the public health or safety of the municipality's residents;" WHEREAS, the City Council finds the procurement of liquid caustic soda is necessary to preserve and protect the public health and safety of the City's residents because it assists in ensuring the City's water remains potable. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: Section 1. The City Council rejects all initial bids submitted for the purchase of liquid caustic soda ("chemical"). Section 2. The City Council finds that the purchase of the chemical is necessary to preserve and protect the public health and safety of the City's residents. The City Council further finds that the preamble language stated in this resolution to be true and correct and adopts such findings for all intents and purposes. Section 3. The City Council finds that pricing was obtained through competitive solicitation. Section 4. The City Manager, or designee ("City Manager"), is authorized to execute a one-year supply contract with Univar, of Kent, Washington, in an amount not to exceed $1,362,882.00, of which an estimated expenditure of $908,588 in FY2016-17 is funded by the Water Fund. The one-year supply contract between the City and Univar is for the purchase of estimated quantities of 25% liquid caustic soda at $139.838 per wet ton and 50% liquid caustic soda at $230.625 per wet ton and includes up to four one-year renewals, each being subject to the mutual consent of the City Manager and the supplier. ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Dan McQueen Mayor day of , 2017 The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Dan McQueen Rudy Garza Paulette Guajardo Michael Hunter Joe McComb Ben Molina Lucy Rubio Greg Smith Carolyn Vaughn Page 2 of 2 SUPPLY AGREEMENT NO. 953 Water Chemicals - Liquid Caustic Soda Solution THIS Water Chemicals - Liquid Caustic Soda Solution Supply Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation ("City") and Univar USA, Inc ("Supplier"), effective for all purposes upon execution by the City Manager or the City Manager's designee ("City Manager"). WHEREAS, Supplier has bid to provide Water Chemicals - Liquid Caustic Soda Solution in response to Request for Bid No. 185A ("RFB"), which RFB includes the required scope of work and all specifications and which RFB and the Supplier's bid response are incorporated by reference in this Agreement as Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively, as if each were fully set out here in its entirety. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Supplier agree as follows: 1. Scope. Supplier will provide Water Chemicals - Liquid Caustic Soda Solution in accordance with the attached Scope of Work, as shown in Attachment A, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. "Goods," "products", and "supplies", as used in this Agreement, refer to and have the same meaning. 2. Term. This Agreement is for twelve months. This Agreement includes an option to extend the term for up to four additional twelve-month periods ("Option Period"), provided, the parties do so prior to expiration of the original term or the then -current Option Period. The decision to exercise the option to extend the term of this Agreement is, at all times, within the sole discretion of the City and is conditioned upon the prior written agreement of the Supplier and the City Manager. 3. Compensation and Payment. The total value of this Agreement is not to exceed $1,362,882.00, subject to approved extensions and changes. Payment will be made for goods delivered and accepted by the City within 30 days of acceptance, subject to receipt of an acceptable invoice. All pricing must be in accordance with the attached Bid/Pricing Schedule, as shown in Attachment B, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1 /16 Page 1 of 7 4. Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this Agreement, including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for payment. The City's Contract Administrator for this Agreement is as follows: Department: O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Phone: 361-826-1954 Email: williamc@cctexas.com 5. Insurance. Before performance can begin under this Agreement, the Supplier must deliver a certificate of insurance ("COI"), as proof of the required insurance coverages, to the City's Risk Manager and the Contract Administrator. Additionally, the COI must state that the City will be given at least 30 days' advance written notice of cancellation, material change in coverage, or intent not to renew any of the policies. The City must be named as an additional insured. The City Attorney must be given copies of all insurance policies within 10 days of the City Manager's written request. Insurance requirements are as stated in Attachment C, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 6. Purchase Release Order. For multiple -release purchases of products to be provided by the Supplier over a period of time, the City will exercise its right to specify time, place and quantity of products to be delivered in the following manner: any City department or division may send to Supplier a purchase release order signed by an authorized agent of the department or division. The purchase release order must refer to this Agreement, and products will remain with the Supplier until such time as the products are delivered and accepted by the City. 7. Inspection and Acceptance. Any products that are delivered but not accepted by the City must be corrected or replaced immediately at no charge to the City. If immediate correction or replacement at no charge cannot be made by the Supplier, a replacement product may be bought by the City on the open market and any costs incurred, including additional costs over the item's bid price, must be paid by the Supplier within 30 days of receipt of City's invoice. 8. Warranty. The Supplier warrants that all products supplied under this Agreement are new, quality items that are free from defects, fit for their intended purpose, and of good material and workmanship. The Supplier City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1 /16 Page 2 of 7 warrants that it has clear title to the products and that the products are free of liens or encumbrances. In addition, the products purchased under this Agreement shall be warranted by the Supplier or, if indicated in Attachment D by the manufacturer, for the period stated in Attachment D. Attachment D is attached to this Agreement and is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 9. Quality/Quantity Adjustments. Any quantities indicated on the Bid/Pricing Schedule are estimates only and do not obligate the City to order or accept more than the City's actual requirements nor do the estimates restrict the City from ordering less than its actual needs during the term of the Agreement and including any Option Period. Substitutions and deviations from the City's product requirements or specifications are prohibited without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator 10. Non -Appropriation. The continuation of this Agreement after the close of any fiscal year of the City, which fiscal year ends on September 30th annually, is subject to appropriations and budget approval specifically covering this Agreement as an expenditure in said budget, and it is within the sole discretion of the City's City Council to determine whether or not to fund this Agreement. The City does not represent that this budget item will be adopted, as said determination is within the City Council's sole discretion when adopting each budget. 11. Independent Contractor. Supplier will perform the work required by this Agreement as an independent contractor and will furnish such products in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances or conditions will any agent, servant or employee of the Supplier be considered an employee of the City. 12. Subcontractors. Supplier may use subcontractors in connection with the work performed under this Agreement. When using subcontractors, however, the Supplier must obtain prior written approval from the Contract Administrator if the subcontractors were not named at the time of bid. In using subcontractors, the Supplier is responsible for all their acts and omissions to the same extent as if the subcontractor and its employees were employees of the Supplier. All requirements set forth as part of this Agreement, including the necessity of providing a COI in advance to the City, are applicable to all subcontractors and their employees to the same extent as if the Supplier and its employees had performed the work. City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1 /16 Page 3 of 7 13. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by written change order signed by both parties. Change orders may be used to modify quantities as deemed necessary by the City. 14. Waiver. No waiver by either party of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement waives any subsequent breach of the same. 15. Taxes. The Supplier covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment taxes and all other related taxes. Upon request, the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of these taxes within 15 days of such request. 16. Notice. Any notice required under this Agreement must be given by fax, hand delivery, or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is deemed received on the day faxed or hand -delivered or on the third day after postmark if sent by certified mail. Notice must be sent as follows: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Attn: William Creech Title: Utility Systems Manager Address: 13101 Leopard Street, Corpus Christi, Texas 78410 Fax IF TO SUPPLIER: Univar USA, Inc Attn: Karen Yurch Title: Sales Manager Address: 15780 Alamo Jet., Elmendorf, TX 78112 Fax: 214-340-9113 17. SUPPLIER AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS ("INDEMNITEES") FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER ON ACCOUNT OF PERSONAL INJURIES (INCLUDING DEATH AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS), PROPERTY LOSS OR DAMAGE, OR ANY OTHER KIND OF INJURY, LOSS, OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES WHICH ARISE OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR IN City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Page 4 of 7 CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEEMENT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE INJURIES, DEATH OR DAMAGES ARE CAUSED OR ARE CLAIMED TO BE CAUSED BY THE CONCURRENT OR CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES, BUT NOT IF BY THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES UNMIXED WITH THE FAULT OF ANY OTHER PERSON. SUPPLIER MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, INVESTIGATE ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ANY KIND ARISING FROM ANY SAID LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF SUPPLIER UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. 18. Termination. (A) The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Supplier's failure to perform the work specified in this Agreement or to keep any required insurance policies in force during the entire term of this Agreement. The Contract Administrator must give the Supplier written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Supplier has not cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. (B) Alternatively, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 30 days advance written notice to the Supplier. The City Manager may also terminate this Agreement upon 24 hours written notice to the Supplier for failure to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes as set out in this Agreement. 19. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement by the Supplier, or of any right or interest contained herein, is effective unless the City Manager first gives written consent to such assignment. The performance of this Agreement by the Supplier is of the essence of this Agreement, and the City Manager's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City Manager on any ground whatsoever. City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Page 5 of 7 20. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is considered to be severable and, if, for any reason, any provision or part of this Agreement is determined to be invalid and contrary to applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of nor affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, but this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part had been omitted. 21. Order of Precedence. In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement, its attachments, and exhibits, such conflicts and inconsistencies will be resolved by reference to the documents in the following order of priority: A. this Agreement and its attachments B. the bid solicitation document, including addenda (Exhibit 1) C. the Supplier's bid response (Exhibit 2) 22. Certificate of Interested Parties. Supplier agrees to comply with Texas Government Code Section 2252.908, as it may be amended, and to complete Form 1295 "Certificate of Interested Parties" as part of this Agreement. 23. Governing Law. This Agreement is subject to all federal, State, and local laws, rules, and regulations. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of the State of Texas, and such form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district, county, or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas. 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, either oral or written, between the parties. (SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS) City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1 /16 Page 6 of 7 SUPPLIER Signature: Printed Name: Igo NF} N L,%"1 -Ll G4-4 Title: U�c P2E-StDe-N Date: , 161 (1' CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Signature: Printed Name: Title: Date: Attached and Incorporated by Reference: Attachment A: Scope of Work Attachment B: Bid/Pricing Schedule Attachment C: Insurance Requirements Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Incorporated by Reference Only: Exhibit 1: RFB No. 185A Exhibit 2: Supplier's Bid Response City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1 /16 Page 7 of 7 Attachment A: Scope of Work Section 4 - Scope of Work 4.1 General Requirements/Background Information The Supplier shall provide Water Chemical - Liquid Caustic Soda Solution for the Utilities Department. Liquid Caustic Soda, also known as sodium hydroxide aqueous solution is used for pH adjustment of the final filter effluent. 4.2 Scope of work Supplier shall supply Liquid Caustic Soda Solution to the Utilities Department to be delivered in tank truck lots in accordance with Specifications for Water Treating Chemicals. A. Water treating chemicals must conform to: Liquid Caustic Soda (Sodium Hydroxide Solution), 50 wt. and 25 wt.% Aqueous Solutions 1. American National Standards Institute/National Sanitation Foundation Institute Standard for Drinking Water Treatment Chemical - Health Effects, ANSI/NSF 60. It is the responsibility of the supplier to inform the City of Corpus Christi (within 24 hours from the time of verbal or written notification to supplier) that its NSF certification has been revoked or lapsed. Loss of NSF certification constitutes grounds for immediate termination of the liquid caustic soda contract. 2. American National Standards Institute/American Water Works Association standard for Caustic Soda (Liquid) ANSI/AWWA B501-03. 3. 50 % Liquid Caustic Soda must contain not less than 48.0 % as Caustic Soda (Sodium Hydroxide NaOH). 4. 25% Liquid Caustic Soda must contain not less than 24.0% as Caustic Soda (Sodium Hydroxide NaOH). 5. The manufacturer must provide an affidavit of compliance, stating that at the time of loading, the chemical(s) furnished under the release order, complies with all applicable requirements to the City of Corpus Christi, Water Production Superintendent, P.O. Box 9277, Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277. B. MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS The liquid Caustic Soda delivered under this agreement must meet the following physical -chemical specifications based on the required concentration: 1. Liquid Caustic Soda 50 wt.% Physico-chemical Parameters Units Specifications Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH) wt.% 48.0 - 52.0 Sodium Oxide (Na2O) wt.% 38.3 - 39.57 Sodium Carbonate (Na2CO3) wt.% <0.15 Sodium Chloride ppm 100.0 Maximum Sodium Chlorate ppm 50.0 Maximum Sodium Sulfate ppm 40.0 Maximum Iron as Fe ppm 5.0 Maximum Appearance n.a. Clear Liquid Specific Gravity g/mL 1.52 - 1.54 Density Ib./gal 12.76 2. Liquid Caustic Soda 25 wt.% Physico-chemical Parameters Units Specifications Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH) wt.% 24.0 -26.0 Sodium Oxide (Na2O) wt.% 18.6 - 20.23 Sodium Carbonate (Na2CO3) wt.% <0.15 Sodium Chloride ppm 100.0 Maximum Sodium Chlorate ppm 50.0 Maximum Sodium Sulfate ppm 40.0 Maximum Iron as Fe ppm 5.0 Maximum Appearance n.a. Clear Liquid Specific Gravity g/mL 1.2 - 1.28 Density Ib./gal 10.6- 10.75 C. DELIVERY AND WEIGHING REQUIREMENTS: Each chemical shipment must be weighed by local certified weigher before delivery to and after unloading at the O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant. The truck driver must promptly deliver chemical shipment weight "ticket" or legible copies to the City of Corpus Christi, Plant Supervisor, 13101 Leopard, Corpus Christi, Texas 78410. Deliveries will be made Monday thru Sunday, 8 A. M. to 5 P. M. only, unless an emergency arises then the Plant Supervisor may approve after hour deliveries. 1. The Supplier must provide a chemical analysis for each chemical shipment (Certificate of Analysis, including Lot number, and production date), and the chemical analysis must include the parameters above described in this scope of work, such as NaOH percentage, specific gravity, Sodium Carbonate mg/liter, and Sodium Chloride mg/liter and the others. 2. Additionally, the Supplier must provide (when) an actualized Laboratory Report of their product for Heavy Metals and/or Trace Elements Analysis (EPA Method 200.7 or similar), including the following elements: Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Lead, Nickel, Thallium, and Mercury. This Report must to be emitted by a Laboratory accredited by NELAP. Upon request, the Supplier will provide an updated report per year as minimum. 3. The Supplier must base billing and pay quantity for each chemical shipment on certified weight tickets for delivery of Liquid Caustic Soda. The Plant Supervisor may reject any chemical shipments as per example: 50% Liquid Caustic Soda containing less than 48.0 percent or more than 52.0 percent as not meeting specifications for NaOH and may reject any chemical shipments of 25% Liquid Caustic Soda containing less than 24.0 percent or more than 26.0 percent as not meeting specifications for NaOH. 4. Supplier must make shipments in approximately 4,000 -gallon tank truck lots to the City of Corpus Christi, O. N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant, 13101 Leopard, Corpus Christi, Texas 78410. D. OWNERSHIP: City's ownership of the Liquid Caustic Soda begins, and Supplier's ownership ceases, upon completion of unloading of the chemical at the O. N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant. E. OSHA AND TRAINING: 1. Any chemical supplied must comply with all requirements and standards of the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Supplier must provide all appropriate chemical and warning markings before delivery. Water Production Superintendent may reject items not meeting OSHA specifications. 2. Supplier at its expense must provide training to City employees in the safe handling, storage, and use of the chemical on a semiannual basis at the Water Production Superintendent's convenience. This training must include a presentation of sufficient length to visually portray the proper procedures of handling, storage, and use of Liquid Caustic Soda and all information contained on the Safety Data Sheet must be thoroughly covered. 3. The Supplier must comply with drug and alcohol testing, education, and training programs that comply with U.S. Department of Transportation Regulations 49CFR, Parts 382 and 40. The Supplier must execute a Certification of compliance with U.S. Department of Transportation regulations 49CFR, Parts 382 and 40 and provide a copy to the Water Production Superintendent on a quarterly basis beginning with the first chemical shipment. 4.3 Contractor Quality Control and Superintendence The Contractor shall establish and maintain a complete Quality Control Program that is acceptable to the Contract Administrator to assure that the requirements of the Contract are provided as specified. The Contractor will also provide supervision of the work to insure it complies with the contract requirement. Attachment B: Bid Pricing Schedule Response For Supplier: Univar USA, Inc. Event # : 202-1 Name: 185A -Liquid Caustic Soda Reference: 185 -Liquid Caustic Soda Description: The City of Corpus Christihereby issues this request for bids. The City is seeking bids from firms interested and qualified in supplying Water Chemical Liquid Caustic Soda Solution. Preview Date: Open Date: 01/03/2017 12:55:00 PM Close Date: 01/04/2017 05:00:00 PM Responded To: 2 Out of 2 Lines Total Bid Amount: 1,362,882.00 USD Q & A Open Date: Q & A Close Date: Dispute Close Date: Line Responses Line 1: 50% Caustic Soda Description: 50% Liquid Caustic Soda must contain not less than 48.0 % as Caustic Soda (Sodium Hydroxide NaOH). 50% Caustic Soda CHEMICALS AND SOLVENTS, COMMERCIAL (IN BULK) Quantity: 5,000.0000 UOM: WE Bid Quantity: 5,000.0000 No Charge: No Vendor Item: 808054 Caustic Soda 50% Comments: 230.625 is wet ton pricing Unit Price: 230.62500 No Bid: No Extended Price: 1,153,125.00 Line 2: 25% Caustic Soda January 5, 2017 1:51:55 PM Page; Event # 202-1: 185A -Liquid Caustic Soda Description: 25% Liquid Caustic Soda must contain not less than 24.0% as Caustic Soda (Sodium Hydroxide NaOH). 25% Caustic Soda CHEMICALS AND SOLVENTS, COMMERCIAL (IN BULK) Quantity: 1,500.0000 UOM: WE Bid Quantity: 1,500.0000 No Charge: No Vendor Item: 795072 Cauastic Soda 25% Comments: 139.838 per wet ton Unit Price: 139.83800 Extended Price: 209,757.00 No Bid: No January 5, 2017 Page 2 1:51:55 PM Attachment C: Insurance Requirements INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS I. BIDDER'S LIABILITY INSURANCE A. Bidder must not commence work under this contract until all insurance required has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Bidder must not allow any subcontractor, to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. B. Bidder must furnish to the City's Risk Manager and Director of Utilities, one (1) copy of Certificates of Insurance with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies by endorsement, and a waiver of subrogation endorsement is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with Certificate of Insurance. Project name and/or number must be listed in Description Box of Certificate of Insurance. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -day advance written notice of cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination required on all certificates and policies. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises — Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Bidders 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non -Owned 3. Rented/Leased $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAIRMENT/POLLUTION LIABILITY Including Cleanup $1,000,000 Per Claim/Occurrence WORKERS'S COMPENSATION (All States Endorsement if Company is not domiciled in Texas) Employer's Liability Statutory and complies with Part II of this Exhibit. $500,000/$500,000/$500,000 C. In the event of accidents of any kind related to this contract, Bidder must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. II. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Applicable for paid employees, Bidder must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers' compensation coverage provided must be in statutory amounts according to the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation. An All States Endorsement shall be required if Bidder is not domiciled in the State of Texas. B. Bidder shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Bidder's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. C. Bidder shall be required to submit renewal certificates of insurance throughout the term of this contract and any extensions within 10 days of the policy expiration dates. All notices under this Exhibit shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 D. Bidder agrees that, with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • List the City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, as additional insureds by endorsement with regard to operations, completed operations, and activities of or on behalf of the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; • Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and • Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any, cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination in coverage and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. E. Within five (5) calendar days of a cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination of coverage, Bidder shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Bidder's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. F. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Bidder's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Bidder to stop work hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Bidder hereunder until Bidder demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. G. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Bidder may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Bidder's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this contract. H. It is agreed that Bidder's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this contract. I. It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this contract. 2016 Insurance Requirements Utilities - WWTP Water Treating Chemical Delivery 10/19/2016 MV Risk Management Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Warranty Requirements are not required for the Service Agreement. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. FORM 1295 1 of 1 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Univar USA Inc. Kent, WA United States 2 Name of go verrmen tal entity or state age ncy that is a p a-ty t oth e caitract for Mich the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2017-151345 Date Filed: 01/06/2017 Date Acknowledged: 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. RFB185A Liquid Caustic Soda Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling 1 Intermediary ,po, s'J ,is. ii.e_ 1 Check only i%t @:ai AtC1 4lrrty. :,649TAii•A 6 AFFIDAVIT* .140.0d '► FWASN��6��` AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE I swear. or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. Signature of author1 d agent of contractin Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said V` - 4-' '( {� G`r his the 10 day of 20 (7 , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. usiness entity e of officer administering oath 1 Y S c is 421. Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath firms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.277 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of January 17, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting January 24, 2017 DATE: January 17, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Rebecca Huerta, City Secretary rebeccah@cctexas.com (361) 826-3105 Disbursement of Council Member Carolyn Vaughn's FY2016/2017 Salary & Car Allowance CAPTION: Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to distribute Council Member Carolyn Vaughn's FY2016/2017 budgeted salary and associated payroll taxes, which are not to be received by Council Member Vaughn, in the amount of $6,459.00, to Animal Care Services to be used to transport canines to other cities for the purpose of adoption and Council Member Carolyn Vaughn's FY2016/2017 budgeted car allowance and associated payroll taxes, which are not to be received by Council Member Vaughn, in the amount of $4,521.30, to Animal Care Services to be used for the provision of diagnostic testing and the treatment of cruelly treated canines housed at the City's Animal Care Services facility. PURPOSE: Council Member Carolyn Vaughn has chosen to transfer to the City of Corpus Christi's Animal Care Services, her FY2016/2017 budgeted city council salary, car allowance and associated payroll taxes to provide for the transporting of canines to other cities for the purpose of adoption and for the provision of diagnostic testing and the treatment of cruelly treated canines housed at the City's Animal Care Services facility. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Council Member Carolyn Vaughn has requested that her FY2016/2017 budgeted salary, car allowance and associated payroll taxes be dedicated toward a public purpose. ALTERNATIVES: Not applicable. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Not applicable. EMERGENCY/NON-EMERGENCY: Non -emergency. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Police Department Legal Department Budget Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: x Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $54,242.40 $0 $54,242.40 Encumbered / Expended Amount $8,882.56 $0 $8,882.56 This item $10,980.30 $0 $10,980.30 BALANCE $34,379.54 $0 $34,379.54 Fund(s): General Fund Comments: None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None. AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of January 17, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting January 24, 2017 DATE: January 17, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Rebecca Huerta, City Secretary rebeccah@cctexas.com (361) 826-3105 Disbursement of Council Member Paulette M. Guajardo's FY2016/2017 Salary CAPTION: Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an agreement with 911 Park Place d.b.a. Mission 911, a Texas non-profit corporation, of Corpus Christi Texas, in the amount of $4,950.73, to be funded by Council Member Paulette M. Guajardo's FY2016/2017 budgeted city council salary and associated payroll taxes, which are not to be received by Council Member Guajardo, in support of programs provided by 911 Park Place d.b.a. Mission 911 in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. PURPOSE: Council Member Paulette M. Guajardo has chosen to dedicate her FY2016/2017 budgeted city council salary and associated payroll taxes to fund, on a cost reimbursement basis, programs provided by a non-profit organization that meet a public purpose in the City of Corpus Christi. 911 Park Place d.b.a. Mission 911 is Council Member Guajardo's selected non-profit organization. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Council Member Paulette M. Guajardo has requested that her annual salary be dedicated toward a public purpose. ALTERNATIVES: Not applicable. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Not applicable. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal Department Budget Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: x Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $54,242.40 $0 $54,242.40 Encumbered / Expended Amount $8,882.56 $0 $8,882.56 This item $4,950.73 $0 $4,950.73 BALANCE $40,409.11 $0 $40,409.11 Fund(s): General Fund Comments: None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Agreement AGREEMENT CONCERNING PAYMENT OF FUNDS IN SUPPORT OF 911 PARK PLACE D.B.A. MISSION 911 The City of Corpus Christi (the "City") and 911 Park Place d.b.a. Mission 911, a Texas non-profit corporation, (the "Contractor"), make this Agreement concerning payment of funds in support of the programs provided by the Contractor. The City and the Contractor agree: 1 The parties acknowledge that the Contractor provides assistance to the homeless and individuals struggling with poverty by providing housing, life skills training and education ("Programs"). 2. The City will reimburse the Contractor up to $4,950.73 for its costs incurred during the period of December 13, 2016 through September 30, 2017 to provide the Programs. A single request for reimbursement, along with receipts of expenses being requested for reimbursement, in the amount not to exceed $4,950.73, shall be submitted by the Contractor to the City Secretary, 1201 Leopard, Corpus Christi, Texas, 78401. 3. The Contractor shall provide all Programs in compliance with applicable Federal, State, and Local laws. 4. The Contractor shall allow the City to review the books and records of the Contractor to monitor the disposition of the funds paid under this Agreement. Such review of books and records would take place during Contractor's normal business hours and may include an audit, to be paid for by the City. 5. Should any audit or other review indicate that any City funds have been applied to uses other than those herein stated, without the express and prior written approval of the City Manager, or designee, the Contractor shall repay the City funds within thirty (30) days of written notice. 6. Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold City, its officers, employees or agents ("Indemnitees") harmless of, from, and against all claims, demands, actions, damages, losses, costs, liabilities, expenses, and judgments recovered from or asserted against Indemnitees on account of injury or damage to person or property to the extent any such damage or injury may be incident to, arise out of, or be caused by, or be in any way connected with, either proximately or remotely, wholly or in part, Contractor's performance of this Agreement; an act or omission, negligence or misconduct on the part of Contractor, or any of its agents, servants, contractors, or employees in performance of this Agreement. 7. This Agreement may be amended at any time by written agreement of the City and the Contractor. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to: President, 911 Park Avenue d.b.a. Mission 911, Corpus Christi, Texas, 78401. Notices to the City shall be addressed to: City Secretary, Office of the City Secretary, P.O. Box 9277, Corpus Christi, Texas, 78469. 8. This Agreement becomes effective upon execution by the City Manager. SIGNED AND AGREED UPON: 911 P .B.A. MISSION 911 T•ny ' eyes President CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Margie C. Rose City Manager ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary /7 Date Date Date CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Corpus Christi Code § 2-349, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See next page for Filing Requirements, Certification and Definitions. 1 COMPANY NAME: 911 .4)( \Ac A VV\ SS t r P. O. BOX: 3157 CITY: STREET ADDRESS: CA (Leo 5 Ci -v2 FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 4. Association STATE: 1 2.Partnership 5.Other ZIP: 7gX 3 3.Sole Owner ❑ DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee' of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Job Title and City Department (if known} �I N 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Board, Commission or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Consultant FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d}} CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that 1 have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: ler-cc( Signature of Certifying Person: Title: '{ 2C c' Date: DEFINITIONS a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee of the city, including the board of any corporation created by the city. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the city, whether under civil service or not, including part-time employees and employees of any corporation created by the city. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official," The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest."Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements. g. "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Mission 911 Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. The City of Corpus Christi lJr r, .fl V.IL v�v� 1 CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2017-152713 Date Filed: 0111(12017 Date Acknowledged: 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. 2017-001 Transitional Housing, Dental Clinic, TXU Energy Aid 4 Name of Interested Party City, state, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling intermediary Rabon, Justin Corpus Christi, TX United States X Reyes, Tony Corpus Christi, TX United States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. 6 AFFIDAVIT SHARON J KNOPP Notary Pubic, State of Texas My Commission Expires APRIL 17, 2018 r 1 I swear, or affirm, un that the above disclosure is true and correct. Sign.. a of : thorized agent of contracting business entity Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said G 10Jy(,e -7104/ 7(59KTS' // day of ZAkei 20 / 1 , to certify which, witness my hand and sea of office. Signature of offiadmi isterinr o s , id d king f&i v Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.277 AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of January 17, 2017 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 DATE: January 5, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Robert Rocha, Fire Chief rrocha@cctexas.com (361) 826-3932 Conversion and reclassification of 24 Firefighter I positions to 24 Firefighter II — EMS positions effective February 1, 2017 pursuant to Resolution No. 030964 and Settlement Agreement. CAPTION: Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 030965 Section 4. to convert and reclassify 24 Firefighter I positions to 24 Firefighter II -EMS positions effective February 1, 2017 pursuant to Resolution No. 030964 and settlement agreement. PURPOSE: Council authorization for amendment to the Ordinance to convert and reclassify 24 Firefighter I positions to 24 Firefighter II — EMS positions effective February 1, 2017 pursuant to Resolution No. 030964 and Settlement Agreement. By Resolution No. 030964 passed on September 20, 2016 and attached herein, the City Council, as the governing body for the City of Corpus Christi, accepted the settlement of Grievance No. 2013-07 and Grievance No. 2013-09 between the Fire Union and the City of Corpus Christi and authorized the City Manager to enter such Settlement Agreement. Based upon Resolution No. 030964 and the Settlement Agreement, the City will convert 24 current Fire Fighter I positions to 24 Fire Fighter II -EMS positions within the current authorized compliment effective February 1, 2017 to help staff medic units 3 and 6. This settlement does not create a staffing requirement or any additional positions above the authorized compliment. The proposed conversion and reclassification will result in changes to the number of Firefighter II — EMS positions (+24) and the number of Firefighter I's (-24) but no change in the overall authorized compliment of (414) effective February 1, 2017. Further, pursuant to §143.021 Texas Local Government Code, the Corpus Christi City Council shall prescribe the number of positions in each classification. Page 1 Position Authorized Proposed Authorized Difference Fire Chief 1 1 0 Deputy Fire Chief 1 1 0 Assistant Fire Chief 4 4 0 Battalion Chief 13 13 0 Fire Captain 79 79 0 Firefighter II — Engineer 73 73 0 Firefighter II — EMS 109 133 +24 Firefighter I 134 110 -24 Total 414 414 0 The Fire Department will be able to absorb the financial impact of $100,822.11 for the 8 months of the current Fiscal Year 2016-17. This amount can be absorbed by the current savings in fuel cost. ALTERNATIVES: None OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Conforms to all City Policies. Council approval of amendment to Ordinance to accept the conversion and reclassification to 24 Fire Fighter I positions to 24 Fire Fighter II — EMS positions effective February 1, 2017 to comply with Resolution No. 030964 and Settlement Agreement. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Staff is requesting a non -emergency reading to this routine, non -controversial item. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal Finance FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015- 2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget 22,223,611.41 22,223,611.41 Encumbered / Expended Amount 3,304,442.23 3,304,442.23 This item 100,822.11 100,822.11 BALANCE 18,818,347.07 18,818,347.07 Fund(s): General Fund Comments: None Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends reclassifying 24 Fire Fighter I positions to 24 Firefighter II - EMS positions pursuant to and to comply with the Resolution and Settlement Agreement. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1) Resolution Approving and Authorizing the City Manager to enter into a Settlement Agreement on behalf of the City of Corpus Christi with the Corpus Christi Professional Fire Fighters Association — Local Union 936 for Grievance No. 2013-07 dated 08-12-13 and Grievance No. 2013-09 dated 12-02-13; and 2) Proposed Ordinance Page 3 ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 030965 SECTION 4. TO CONVERT AND RECLASSIFY 24 FIREFIGHTER I POSITIONS TO 24 FIREFIGHTER II -EMS POSITIONS EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 1, 2017 PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 030964 AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Resolution No. 030964 passed on September 20, 2016, the City Council, as the governing body for the City of Corpus Christi, accepted the settlement of Grievance No. 2013-07 and Grievance No. 2013-09 between the Fire Union and the City of Corpus Christi and authorized the City Manager to enter such Settlement Agreement. WHEREAS, based upon Resolution No. 030964 and the Settlement Agreement, the City will convert 24 current Fire Fighter I positions to 24 Fire Fighter II -EMS positions within the current authorized compliment effective February 1, 2017 to help staff medic units 3 and 6. This settlement does not create a staffing requirement or any additional positions above the authorized compliment. WHEREAS, the conversion and reclassification will result in changes to the number of Firefighter II — EMS positions (+24) and the number of Firefighter I's (-24) but no change in the overall authorized compliment of (414) effective February 1, 2017. WHEREAS, pursuant to §143.021 Texas Local Government Code, the Corpus Christi City Council shall prescribe the number of positions in each classification. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 030965 is amended by converting and reclassifying 24 current Fire Fighter I positions to 24 Fire Fighter II -EMS positions within the current authorized compliment effective February 1, 2017 and shall read as follows: "SECTION 4. Firefighter Positions The number of positions authorized for each firefighter classification in the Fire Department shall be: Page 1 Firefighter — 110* Firefighter II- EMS — 133 Firefighter II — Engineer — 73 Fire Captain — 79 Battalion Chief — 13 Assistant Fire Chief — 4 Deputy Fire Chief — 1 Fire Chief — 1 FY16-17 TOTAL 414 *This number may be temporarily increased by graduates from a fire academy authorized by the City Manager, which temporary increase shall be reduced to budgeted total through attrition. " SECTION 2. This ordinance is effective February 1, 2017. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Dan McQueen Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Joe McComb Page 2 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Dan McQueen Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Joe McComb PASSED AND APPROVED, this the th day of ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Page 3 Dan McQueen Mayor Resolution Approving and Authorizing the City Manager to Enter Into a Settlement Agreement on behalf of the City of Corpus Christi with the Corpus Christi Professional Fire Fighters Association — Local Union 936 for Grievance No. 2013-07 dated 08-12-13 and Grievance No. 2013-09 dated 12-02-13. WHEREAS, the Corpus Christi Professional Firefighters Association — Local Union 936 (the Fire Union) filed contract grievances with the City of Corpus Christi (the City) under the August 1, 2011 through July 31, 2014 Collective Bargaining Agreement between the Fire Union and the City identified as Grievance No. 2013-07 and Grievance No. 2013-09; and WHEREAS, the City of Corpus Christi and the Corpus Christi Professional Fire Fighters Association — Local Union 936 have agreed upon a new Collective Bargaining Agreement for wages, benefits and working conditions; WHEREAS, the City of Corpus Christi and the Corpus Christi Professional Fire Fighters Association — Local Union 936 have reached a tentative settlement of Grievance No. 2013-07 and Grievance No. 2013-09 through mediation; and WHEREAS, the City Council was presented and briefed on the tentative settlement of Grievance No. 2013-07 and Grievance No. 2013-09; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. The City Council, as the governing body for the City of Corpus Christi, is hereby accepting the settlement of Grievance No. 2013-07 and Grievance No. 2013-09 between the Fire Union and the City of Corpus Christi and hereby authorizes the City Manager to Enter into such Settlement Agreement. Section 2. Based upon the Settlement Agreement, the City will convert 24 current Fire Fighter I positions to Fire Fighter II -EMS positions within the current authorized compliment effective February 1, 2017 to help staff medic units 3 and 6. This settlement does not create a staffing requirement or any additional positions above the authorized compliment. ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS ce,e_ctAtte t-r(i„ Rebecca Huerta, City Secretary Nelda Martinez, Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas (9\0 1► of&P`ak-b0- , 2016 130964 INDEXED The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Rudy Garza Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Michael Hunter Brian Rosas Lucy Rubio Carolyn Vaughn Mark Scott 'J30961 Page 2 AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading Ordinance Item for the City Council Meeting of January 17, 2017 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 DATE: TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager 12/23/2016 FROM: Julio Dimas, CFM, Interim Director, Development Services JulioD@cctexas.com (361) 826-3276 Approval of agreement and appropriating funds for David E. and Christine L. Harris., for the construction of water arterial transmission and grid main line CAPTION: Ordinance authorizing City Manager or designee to execute a water arterial transmission and grid main construction and reimbursement agreement ("Agreement") with David E. and Christine L. Harris ("Developer"), for the construction of a water arterial transmission and grid main line and appropriating $141,334.85 from the No. 4030 Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Trust Fund to reimburse the Developer in accordance with the Agreement. PURPOSE: David E. and Christine L. Harris., are required to install 2,366 linear feet of 12 -inch water arterial grid main extension in order to provide adequate water to a proposed residential subdivision development. The subdivision is located south of South Padre Island Drive (SH 358), west of Flour Bluff Drive, along Glenoak Drive. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Per Section 8.5.1.0 (1) Credits and Reimbursements of the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), David E. and Christine L. Harris, are requesting a Reimbursement Agreement for the development of Harris Acres, Block 1, Lot 1 as shown on the final plat. The subdivision is located south of South Padre Island Drive (SH 358) west of Flour Bluff Drive, along Glenoak Drive. The development requires the extension of 2,366 linear feet of 12 -inch water arterial grid main in order to provide adequate water to the property. A layout of existing and proposed improvements is included as Exhibit 3. The 12 -inch waterline is eligible for full reimbursement from the Water Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Trust Fund. The Water Master Plan calls for the construction of a 12 -inch water arterial grid main along Glenoak Drive. If the actual costs for installation of such arterial transmission and mains are greater than the lot or acreage fee, the developer shall be reimbursed (less any lot or acreage fee credits) from funds available from the Water Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Trust Fund for that portion of the arterial transmission and grid main installed by the developer. In this case, the total construction cost of the 12 - inch water arterial grid main is $144,261.18 minus the lot/acreage fee of $2,926.33 which equals $141,334.85. ALTERNATIVES: Disapproval of the Reimbursement Agreement. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The developer will be extending a water grid main to serve the proposed residential development and has requested a Reimbursement Agreement, as provided in the Unified Development Code. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal Finance FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not Applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $2,319,559.66 Encumbered / Expended Amount $ 887,191.62 This item $ 141,334.85 BALANCE $1,291,033.19 Fund(s): Water Arterial Transmission Grid Main Trust Fund Comments: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Maps ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE A WATER ARTERIAL TRANSMISSION AND GRID MAIN CONSTRUCTION AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT ("AGREEMENT") WITH DAVID E. AND CHRISTINE L. HARRIS ("DEVELOPER"), FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WATER ARTERIAL TRANSMISSION AND GRID MAIN LINE AND APPROPRIATING $141,334.85 FROM THE NO. 4030 ARTERIAL TRANSMISSION AND GRID MAIN TRUST FUND TO REIMBURSE THE DEVELOPER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AGREEMENT. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute a water arterial transmission and grid main construction and reimbursement agreement ("Agreement"), attached hereto, with David E. and Christine L. Harris ("Developer"), for the extension of a 12 -inch water arterial transmission and grid main line, including all related appurtenances, for the development of Harris Acres, Block 1, Lot 1 Subdivision, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas. SECTION 2. Funding in the amount of $141,334.85 is appropriated from the No. 4030 Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Line Trust Fund to reimburse the Developer for the construction of the water arterial transmission and grid main line improvements in accordance with the Agreement. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Dan McQueen Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Joe McComb That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Dan McQueen Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Joe McComb PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Dan McQueen Mayor WATER ARTERIAL TRANSMISSION AND GRID MAIN CONSTRUCTION AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES § This Water Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Construction and Reimbursement Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into between the City of Corpus Christi ("City"), a Texas home -rule municipality, P.O. Box 9277, Corpus Christi, Texas, 78469-9277, and David E. and Christine L. Harris ("Developer "), 922 Glenoak Drive, Corpus Christi, Texas 78418. WHEREAS, the Developer, in compliance with the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), proposes to final plat the Property as shown on the attached final plat known as Harris Acres, Block 1, Lot 1 ("Development"), as shown in Exhibit 1 (attached and incorporated); WHEREAS, under the UDC and as a condition of such plat of Harris Acres, Block 1, Lot 1, Developer is required to construct a public waterline in order to record such plat; WHEREAS, Developer has submitted an application for reimbursement of the costs of extending a 12 -inch waterline from the existing 12 -inch waterline located on the south side of Glenoak Drive for a distance of 2,366 linear feet in order to connect to water grid main along Roscher Road and consistent with the Unified Development Code (Exhibit 2); WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City to have the 12 -inch waterline on Glenoak Drive for a distance of 2,366 linear feet installed by Developer in conjunction with the final plat; WHEREAS, Resolution No. 026869 authorized the acceptance of applications to be eligible for reimbursement in the future when funds are fully available in, and are appropriated by City Council, the Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Line Trust Fund as per the UDC, Section 8.5.1.C(1), and WHEREAS, Chapter 212 of the Texas Local Government Code authorizes a municipality to make a contract with a Developer of a subdivision or land in the municipality to construct public improvements related to the subdivision or land; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration set forth hereinafter and in order to provide a coordinated waterline construction project, the City and Developer agree as follows: Subject to the terms of this Agreement and the plat of Harris Acre`s, Block 1, Lot 1, Developer will construct the 12 -inch waterline for and on behalf of the City in accordance with the plans and specifications as are approved by the City Engineer on behalf of the City. 1. REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION The Developer shall construct the 12 -inch waterline improvements, in compliance with the City's UDC and under the plans and specifications approved by the Development Services Engineer. 2. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS a. The Developer shall contract with a professional engineer, acceptable to the City's Development Services Engineer, to prepare plans and specifications for the construction of the 12 -inch waterline, as shown in Exhibit 3, with the following basic design: 1. Install 2,366 linear feet of 12 -inch PVC waterline pipe. 2. Install two (2) gate valves and boxes. 3. Install one (1) 12 x 90 -degree ductile iron elbow. 4. Install two (2) 12 x 45 -degree ductile iron bends. 5. Install one (1) 12 x 8 reducer. 6. Install four (4) fire hydrant assemblies. 7. Install two (2) ties to existing water line. 8. Install 189 linear feet bore with Eagle LOC pipe. 9. Install one (1) fence repair. 10. Install one (1) driveway repair. 11. Install one (1) clear and grub. 12. Install one (1) short single service connection. b. The plans and specifications must comply with City Water Distribution Standards and Standard Specifications. c. Before the Developer starts construction the plans and specification must be approved by the City's Development Services Engineer. 3. SITE IMPROVEMENTS Prior to the start of construction of the 12 -inch waterline improvements, Developer shall acquire and dedicate to the City the required additional utility easements "Easements", if necessary for the completion of the 12 -inch waterline. If any of the property needed for the Easements is owned by a third party and Developer is unable to acquire the Easements through reasonable efforts, then the City will use its powers of eminent domain to acquire the Easements. Arterial Tran and Grid Main Reimb Agmt David E. and Christine L. Harris -Harris Acres, Blk 1, Lot 1vFinal Standard Form Reimbursement Agreement Template Version 1.0 3.29.16 Page 2 of 10 4. PLATTING FEES Developer shall pay to the City of Corpus Christi the required acreage fees and pro -rata fees as required by the UDC for the area of the improvements for the construction of the 12 -inch waterline. The required acreage fees Developer is to pay to the City under the UDC for the 12 -inch waterline improvements will be credited to Developer provided that an application for credit, including cost - supporting documentation, has been submitted to the Assistant City Manager of Development Services prior to the installation of the 12 -inch waterline and is approved. 5. DEVELOPER AWARD CONTRACT FOR IMPROVEMENTS Developer shall award a contract and complete the improvements to 12 -inch waterline, under the approved plans and specifications, by January 24, 2018. 6. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE Time is of the essence in the performance of this contract. 7. PROMPT AND GOOD FAITH ACTIONS The parties shall act promptly and in good faith in performing their duties or obligations under this Agreement. If this Agreement calls for review or inspections by the City, then the City's reviews or inspections must be completed thoroughly and promptly. 8. DEFAULT The following events shall constitute default: a. Developer fails to engage a professional engineer for the preparation of plans and specifications by the 10th calendar day after the date of approval by City Council. b. Developer's professional engineer fails to submit the plans and specifications to the City's Director of Engineering Services by the 40th calendar day after the date of approval by City Council. c. Developer fails to award a contract for the construction of the project, according to the approved plans and specifications, by the 70th calendar day after the date of approval by City Council. d. Developer's contractor does not reasonably pursue construction of the project under the approved plans and specifications. e. Developer's contractor fails to complete construction of the project, under the approved plans and specifications, on or before January 24, 2018. f. Either the City or Developer otherwise fails to comply with its duties and obligations under this Agreement. Arterial Tran and Grid Main Reimb Agmt David E. and Christine L. Harris -Harris Acres, Blk 1, Lot lvFinal Standard Form Reimbursement Agreement Template Version 1.0 3.29.16 Page 3 of 10 9. NOTICE AND CURE a. In the event of a default by either party under this Agreement, the non - defaulting party shall deliver notice of the default, in writing, to the defaulting party stating, in detail the nature of the default and the requirements to cure such default. b. After delivery of the default notice, the defaulting party has 15 business days from the delivery of the default notice ("Cure Period") to cure the default. c. In the event the default is not cured by the defaulting party within the Cure Period, then the non -defaulting party may pursue its remedies in this section. d. Should Developer fail to perform any obligation or duty of this Agreement, the City shall give notice to Developer, at the address stated above, of the need to perform the obligation or duty, and should Developer fail to perform the required obligation or duty within 15 days of receipt of the notice, the City may perform the obligation or duty, charging the cost of such performance to Developer by reducing the reimbursement amount due Developer. e. In the event of an uncured default by the Developer, after the appropriate notice and cure period, the City has all its common law remedies and the City may: 1. Terminate this Agreement after the required notice and opportunity to cure the default. 2. Refuse to record a related plat or issue any certificate of occupancy for any structure to be served by the project. 3. Perform any obligation or duty of the Developer under this agreement and charge the cost of such performance to Developer. Developer shall pay to City the reasonable and necessary cost of the performance within 30 days from the date Developer receives notice of the cost of performance. In the event that Developer pays the City under the preceding sentence, and is not otherwise in default under this Agreement, then the Agreement shall be considered in effect and no longer in default. f. In the event of an uncured default by the City after the appropriate notice and cure period, the Developer has all its remedies at law or equity for such default. 10. FORCE MAJEURE a. The term "force majeure" as employed in this Agreement means and refers to acts of God; strikes, lockouts, or other industrial disturbances; Arterial Tran and Grid Main Reimb Agmt David E. and Christine L. Harris -Harris Acres, Blk 1, Lot 1vFinal Standard Form Reimbursement Agreement Template Version 1.0 3.29.16 Page 4 of 10 11. acts of public enemies; insurrections; riots; epidemic; landslides; lightning; earthquakes; fires; hurricanes; storms; floods; washouts; droughts; arrests; civil disturbances; explosions; or other causes not reasonably within the control of the party claiming the inability. b. If, by reason of force majeure, either party is rendered wholly or partially unable to carry out its obligations under this Agreement, then the party shall give written notice of the full particulars of the force majeure to the other party within ten (10) business days after the occurrence or waive the right to claim it as a justifiable reason for delay. The obligations of the party giving the required notice, to the extent affected by the force majeure, are suspended during the continuance of the inability claimed, but for no longer period, and the party shall endeavor to remove or overcome such inability with all reasonable dispatch. NOTICES a. Any notice or other communication required or permitted to be given under this Agreement must be given to the other Party in writing at the following address: 1. If to the Developer: David E. and Christine L. Harris 922 Glenoak Drive Corpus Christi, Texas 78418 2. If to the City: City of Corpus Christi 1201 Leopard Street (78401) P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469 ATTN: Assistant City Manager Development Services b. Notice required by the paragraph may be by United States Postal Service, First Class Mail, Certified, Retum Receipt Requested, postage prepaid; by a commercial delivery service that provides proof of delivery, delivery prepaid; or by personal delivery. c. Either party may change of address for notices by giving notice of the change under the provisions of this section. 12. THIRD -PARTY BENEFICIARY Developer's contracts with the professional engineer for the preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of the project, contracts for testing services, and with the contractor for the construction of the project must provide that the City is a third party beneficiary of each contract. 13. PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS Developer shall require its contractor for the construction of the project, before beginning the work, to execute with Developer and the City a performance bond if the contract is in excess of $100,000 and a payment bond if the contract is in Arterial Tran and Grid Main Reimb Agmt David E. and Christine L. Harris -Harris Acres, Blk 1, Lot IvFinal Standard Form Reimbursement Agreement Template Version 1.0 3.29.16 Page 5 of 10 excess of $25,000. The performance and payment bond must comply with Texas Government Code, Chapter 2253 and must be in the form and substance as attached to this Agreement. 14. WARRANTY Developer shall fully warranty the workmanship of and function of the 12 -inch waterline improvements and the construction thereof for a period of one year from and after the date of acceptance of the facilities by the City Engineer. 15. REIMBURSEMENT a. Subject to the appropriation of funds, the City will reimburse the Developer 100% of the reasonable cost of the 12 -inch waterline improvements, not to exceed $141,334.85. See attached cost estimate (Exhibit 4). b. Subject to the appropriation of funds, the City agrees to reimburse the Developer on a monthly basis upon invoicing for work performed. The reimbursement will be made no later than 30 -days from the date of the invoice. Developer shall submit all required performance bonds and proof of required insurance under the provisions of this Agreement as detailed in Exhibit 5. c. To be eligible for reimbursement, the work completed in a good and workmanlike manner, and must have been inspected and accepted by the City. The City agrees to conduct periodic inspections and approve the progress of the work at key points during construction. d. In the event that this Agreement is terminated by the City at a time when there has been a partial completion and partial payment for the improvements, then the City shall only reimburse Developer for its costs that were legitimately incurred towards the completion of the improvements that have been inspected and accepted by the City up to the time that there is an uncured default by the Developer. 16. INDEMNIFICATION DEVELOPER, COVENANTS TO FULLY INDEMNIFY, SAVE AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS, ("INDEMNITEES") AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS SUITS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER ASSERTED AGAINST OR RECOVERED FROM CITY ON ACCOUNT OF INJURY OR DAMAGE TO PERSON INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION ON THE FOREGOING, WORKERS COMPENSATION AND DEATH CLAIMS, OR PROPERTY LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY OTHER KIND WHATSOEVER, TO THE EXTENT ANY INJURY, DAMAGE, OR LOSS MAY BE INCIDENT TO, ARISE OUT OF, BE CAUSED BY, OR BE IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH, EITHER PROXIMATELY OR REMOTELY, WHOLLY OR IN PART, THE DEVELOPER'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT OR TO Arterial Tran and Grid Main Reimb Agmt David E. and Christine L. Harris -Harris Acres, Blk 1, Lot 1 vFinal Standard Form Reimbursement Agreement Template Version 1.0 3.29.16 Page 6 of 10 PROVIDE CITY WATER SERVICE TO THE DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING INJURY, LOSS, OR DAMAGE WHICH ARISE OUT OF OR ARE IN ANY MANNER CONNECTED WITH, OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR BE IN ANY MANNER CONNECTED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, EXISTENCE, OPERATION, USE, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, RESTORATION, OR REMOVAL OF THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT DESCRIBED ABOVE, INCLUDING THE INJURY, LOSS OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE SOLE OR CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF THE INDEMNITEES OR ANY OF THEM, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE INJURY, DAMAGE, LOSS, VIOLATION, EXERCISE OF RIGHTS, ACT, OR OMISSION IS CAUSED OR IS CLAIMED TO BE CAUSED BY THE CONTRIBUTING OR CONCURRENT NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES, OR ANY OF THEM, BUT NOT IF CAUSED BY THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES, OR ANY OF THEM, UNMIXED WITH THE FAULT OF ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY, AND INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, AND ATTORNEYS FEES, WHICH ARISE, OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE ASSERTED OR RECOVERED INCIDENT. THIS INDEMNITY SPECIFICALLY INCLUDES ALL CLAIMS, DAMAGES, AND LIABILITIES OF WHATEVER NATURE, FORESEEN OR UNFORESEEN, UNDER ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LAWS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: (A) ALL FEES INCURRED IN DEFENDING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING BROUGHT BY A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ENTITY AND ARISING FROM THE PRESENCE, CONTAINMENT, USE, MANUFACTURE, HANDLING, CREATING, STORAGE, TREATMENT, DISCHARGE, RELEASE OR BURIAL ON THE PROPERTY OR THE TRANSPORTATION TO OR FROM THE PROPERTY OF ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE. THE FEES FOR WHICH THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE UNDER THIS SUBPARAGRAPH SHALL INCLUDE BUT SHALL NOT BE LIMITED TO THE FEES CHARGED BY (I) ATTORNEYS, (1I) ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, (III) ENGINEERS, (IV) SURVEYORS, AND (V) EXPERT WITNESSES. (B) ANY COSTS INCURRED ATTRIBUTABLE TO (I) THE BREACH OF ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION MADE BY DEVELOPER/OWNER IN THIS AGREEMENT, OR (II) ANY CLEANUP, DETOXIFICATION, REMEDIATION, OR OTHER TYPE OF RESPONSE ACTION TAKEN WITH RESPECT TO ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE ON OR UNDER THE PROPERTY REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR NOT THAT ACTION WAS MANDATED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. THIS INDEMNITY SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THE AGREEMENT. Arterial Tran and Grid Main Reimb Agmt David E. and Christine L. Harris -Harris Acres, Blk 1, Lot 1vFinal Standard Form Reimbursement Agreement Template Version 1.0 3.29.16 Page 7 of 10 17. ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT This Agreement may be assigned by Developer to another with the written consent of the City's City Manager. 18. COVENANT RUNNING WITH THE LAND This Agreement is a covenant running with the land, Harris Acres, Block 1, Lot 1, a subdivision in Nueces County, Texas, and must be recorded in the Official Public Records of Nueces County, Texas. The duties, rights, and obligations of the Agreement are binding on and inure to the benefit of the Developer's successors or assigns. 19. DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP INTERESTS Developer further agrees, in compliance with the City Ordinance No. 17110, to complete, as part of this Agreement, the Disclosure of Ownership interests form attached hereto as Exhibit 6. 20. AUTHORITY All signatories signing this Agreement warrant and guarantee that they have the authority to act on behalf of the entity represented and make this Agreement binding and enforceable by their signature. 21. EFFECTIVE DATE This Agreement shall be executed in one original, which shall be considered one instrument. *This Agreement becomes effective and is binding upon, and inures to the benefit of the City and Developer from and after the date that all original copies have been executed by all signatories. EXECUTED IN ONE original, *this day of , 2017. SIGNATURES FOUND ON PAGES 9 and 10. Arterial Tran and Grid Main Reimb Agmt David E. and Christine L. Harris -Harris Acres, Blk 1, Lot 1vFinal Standard Form Reimbursement Agreement Template Version 1.0 3.29.16 Page 8 of 10 Developer David E. Harris 922 Glenoak Drive Corpus Christi, Texas 78418 By: 1�►-� David E. Harris Individual THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES § This instrument was signed by David E. Harris, Owner, and acknowledged before me on the ° 1 day of tiEcEVA,},e,t— , 2016. Developer Christine L. Harris 922 Glenoak Drive Corpus Christi, Texas 78418 By: r ohristine L. Harris Individual ibismaimighlibmilmlhiamderdhigas JESUS DOMINGUEZ Notary IDM 10628870 1 My Commission Expires May 27, 2020 THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES § This instrument was signed by Christine L. Harris, Owner, and acknowledged before me on the 2c1 day of D►=1trA6V-- , 2016. • • JEWS J DOMINGUEZ Notary ID r 10528870 My Commission Expires May 27, 2020 Arteri- r- •-n= G.. Main Reimb Agmt David E. and Christine L_ Harris -Harris Acres, Blk 1, Lot 1vFinal Standard Form Reimbursement Agreement Template Version 1.0 3.29.16 Page 9 of 10 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI: ATTEST: By: By: Rebecca Huerta Julio Dimas, CFM City Secretary Development Services Interim Director THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES § This instrument was signed by Rebecca Huerta, City Secretary, for the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, and acknowledged before me on the day of 2017. Notary Public, State Of Texas THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES § This instrument was signed by Julio Dimas, CFM, Development Services Interim Director, for the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, and acknowledged before me on the day of , 2017. Notary Public, State Of Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM: This 2 '1 day of e Ce0A 73ce,04 ,e2-6e,ce, Assistant City Attorney For the City Attorney WV' , 2016. Arterial Tran and Grid Main Reimb Agmt David E. and Christine L. Harris -Harris Acres, Blk 1, Lot 1vFinal Standard Form Reimbursement Agreement Template Version 1.0 3.29.16 Page 10of10 txntoII I HR jig ! void -12 g4s bEil 1-- WI 11 VI keV HH c 1!! 5 P 4g 5158 2 114 d; esa;J s5 ill111 z €s ;li ] Alf ki 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 :114 as p 11 4 4 4 g 11 11 zA lj s s ri 117NtffNWa roWle Oet�w 1 4 g g k iL a 1 Jig /ab 4.7. w , 41 yam /b1'y tikr S 0 �hy1 b 444et �' b b• ��`� lrTT113 / / d [ a.<`C • APPLICATION FOR WATERLINE REIMBURSEMENT 1, David E. Harris 922 Glenoak, Corpus Christi, TX 78418, owner and developer of proposed Harris Acres Block 1, Lot 1, hereby request reimbursement of $141,334.85 for the installation of the grid main water line, 12" C-900 PVC, in conjunction with said lot, as provided for by City Ordinance No. 17092. $144,261.18 is the construction cost, including 15% Engineering, testing and Surveying, less the lot/acreage fee, as shown by the cost supporting documents attached herewith. David E. Harris 4-)6 Date Date THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES § This instrument was acknowledged before me on / / / , 2016, by David E. Harris lot 1. ' MARISELDA LUGO RESENDEZ 1► . use ID# 680183-8 1* • t Notary Public �.✓�% STATE OF TEXAS :.73:!,2:F„1,7.:+' My Comm. Exp. 02-20-2020 THE STATE OF TEXAS , Owner, of Harris Acres Block 1, Notary Public in and 6for thd-State of Texas 1-40/U1.AA +tel rristine L. Harris COUNTY OF NUECES § This instrument was acknowledged before me on 2016, by Christine L. Harris Block 1, lot 1. o; p„ 4\ MARISELDA LUGO RESENDEZ �' tD# 680183-8 bS Notary Public STATE OF TEXAS 'sof My Comm. Exp 02-20-2020 11 C^16 Date , Owner, of Harris Acres Notary Exhibit 2 ublic in and fo e ate of Texas Page 1 of 3 CERTIFICATION The information submitted with this application for reimbursement has been reviewed and determined to be correct. Reimbursement is subject to: (a) Sufficiency of funds in the Arterial Grid Main Trust Fund, and (b) Appropriation and approval by the City Council. Devel ent Services Engineer (Date) Exhibit 2 Page 2 of 3 APPLICATION FOR WATERLINE CREDIT 1, David E. Harris 922 Glenoak, Corpus Christi, TX 78418, Owner and developer of proposed Harris Acres Block 1, Lot 1, hereby apply for $2,926.33 credit towards the water lot/acreage fee for the installation of the grid main water line, 12" C-900 PVC, as provided for by City Ordinance No. 17092. $144,261.18 is the construction cost, including 15 % Engineering, testing and Surveying, as shown by the cost supporting documents attached herewith. l David E Harris THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NUECES This instrument was acknowledged before me on David E. Hams w w w w w w w w < t'AYPB \MARISELDA LUGO RESENDEZ ID# 680183.8 t' y� Noiary Public �. `, h STATE OF TEXAS ., oc My Comm. Exp. 02-20202( THE STATE OF TEXAS '2-(-lc.3 Date , 2016, by , Owner, of Ham . Acres Block 1, lot 1. Notary Public in and the t= e o Texas C1 ris ine L. Hams COUNTY OF NUECES § This instrument was acknowledged before me on /b2 // //4 2016, by Christine L. Harris Block 1, lot 1. MARISELDA LUGO RESENDEZ ID# 680183.8 } • ! Notary Public .41 OFr i' My Comm-Exp.T02-2 S 1 o 20.2020 Date , Owner, of Harris Acres air Notary Public in and fo e State of Texas Exhibit 2 Page 3 of 3 0 1— cn1- 2 2 co w Z� QO J cc 0- z Ow J U cc CCw coQ z� 0 VV m a cc 0 u_ T 1- 0 J vT V 0 J CO CI) w CC U cc cc w 1- 1- s 0 cc0 6666 ��ql uij 4 1" nql 1 11 QMI E i ""'iso !!!! !IliI liTItit ii 1;666 Sin OMB rac arra IN J URI AO, rp'J k A a b Q 8 a. 4: c9 NI If iy i. In 0 Per �sssssn A M.in 'tlL07.0 KJTairPJIal 4111 -4,4ehe 61731 Immo Cndak0 BANC 19G0011 m 3M10 71v01010 1 .101 1 )007 11317V S!l1M11 MVId dE.LVM mend � L g / 1 FF I11101111111ein 1141 dIDY 16 ;VI 21.11 t 7 �g� 11. i1 g�i a1,';e.1.1 ;ia ■1 ` 191tx of-�r-I a�a�r),.iii�riF eF■ 7�aE1. +cst ii'iyEisi■1 iLFIF: _••�¢'_,Io1To gqr�Pli1P•if,���9Fg# i'�EIi�I s i i ---I— 1 `` 11 ll i��Fe�eEi9ai9ile�:�z14:ii'tli:��i.■,r,5.� i 051 ,aj Pi i{5 §i 1 i} j� I '—'1-17—•—r• ! 9r._J r suiL...L...., om ._ wfl 4.was _ QIj Y,Yrwi� ➢ � �i _ Igtil• 6 g . yy° 0 % I 1i L©NIE133NION3 MINIUM a I }y: w l • r. ter 1411 �Nk 4- x w oaossari • w 11 lid!J V ~ � -ori n 'O3fl3 7 HJ 10MTL70 a■7 '.wn° Mit =Len > NAM LSCL3CU OL JA Mrasa L .101 1 LOOM MEM NMI NTId NOW111Od 1EUYMY* O1s • DNI1:133N19N3 NVeiln 101 v i r ,ig 1 2 �- s iill as�aaaB I2a3 j 3# ; la a.a ea11 _3 E �itdAi rn ii! ivE s 1< i f t# l l i, i ;hih 1 1 ;1" e F 1 I 1 A 1 ` h a g F1 1 1 t r� I 'i ylitI t ; 1 1 g 'i III II � 1 �4 3 '. 55yp3 sun4i1144...1101,41�19`; i } -j Y N3 1 g r _ i sib f 'l 1 a �`�1 1 re' i tz - 0 > k I 1. : p 1 :i >i sarei €i 11; i r :aa 'slytiI Fg11G@ : 1. I 11 i'AM 1� - Ygida, .i I •1 • Mr 11 F 7;d tLre.pairapif it '.;.51. 1!6 1 ;F li il III! §11.. 1 1 1 °:■ p Fl��PEi'i 41 ✓ y g Bs_EO & fir! i_ }�' I ■q16,91416: i �At Y e▪ `(� 3Ia ibtl - aun 471.11� .un ilon b' r QYeee : 1; S OH 2 gill i' 8E I 1 ti 0 Cl 0 a) 01 .c W 1 1 rwolbad pop.doa p puawplodad SVX31 11S1dH3 Sfldeoi J° A113 • A 1 51400 110.030113 0,71 1111f1]H MON ?WPM n31S.lS udvlIal40 r31Vr SlIV130 G NONV1S 213.129% OSLNO S11d103 JO Alla lv vw al1111ogo qti pEp/14 4 8h 5 Pi ag WA 11 11 111 11 — ii . all _t .0,14.7 ad 1 k 01 I ;1101 0 3 .04 Of 14h NM 4g 4'i H pl�lir I * aRill1 !Ielli E11W .0• Q. 6ir . 1b =, ! 1411!i 15 l'illid Pi b 1 f Ib .15, 1 0 e�gt 16 a iiiIiiigif . 11 — ii . all _t .0,14.7 ad 1 k 01 I ;1101 0 3 .04 Of 14h NM 4g 4'i H 1 411 liq! NO pi ts i laikii _ ;i ril 1 al i I ! it i Q eh r art 1 4a El i ° 1 ba iiiiii i!I 11 i !I r"�k 4 81: IN 1 I I 1II r IX h r 1 1 IXill hi 1 ii! eWiAl gh a 11 li 1 : 111 1 X" IP b hi 1 WI ini 11 i id " i 1 i I till P 1 h 44�r t� H ��� !I a �� a rhe ��thili lHE 11 ::� R r 1 !I141 9 F'� �gi it 4 d ° to h1111 Ili r q1;111P ih _h idi Ili ib :h rdip€1 %1§ V 1 1 IiHnt _l1 Iliiiii 1$ rhi fir pl�lir I * aRill1 !Ielli E11W 511• r ; ilti 1 7 4 ii id EEWO FliGii Q. 6ir . 1b =, ! 1411!i 15 l'illid Pi b 1 f Ib .15, 1 0 e�gt 16 a iiiIiiigif . i. ill ir. hi b:. ;1 11 „i 1111 IIbili ! ill i 1 11: ,I i , .% I 1 r" aa 11111 e 1 411 liq! NO pi ts i laikii _ ;i ril 1 al i I ! it i Q eh r art 1 4a El i ° 1 ba iiiiii i!I 11 i !I r"�k 4 81: IN 1 I I 1II r IX h r 1 1 IXill hi 1 ii! eWiAl gh a 11 li 1 : 111 1 X" IP b hi 1 WI ini 11 i id " i 1 i I till P 1 h 44�r t� H ��� !I a �� a rhe ��thili lHE 11 ::� R r 1 !I141 9 F'� �gi it 4 d ° to h1111 Ili r q1;111P ih _h idi Ili ib :h rdip€1 %1§ V 1 1 IiHnt _l1 Iliiiii 1$ rhi fir stuon5o.id trapdoo- lo womb:1412v SVX31 LIShiiHD Sildt103 Jo ADD 1 t JO t all OMI *OU 361•A 'OttifflAN 31e.1 S1IV.130 OtIVONVIS ElLYM usisci vulva:. Jo MJ a 41 1 1.1 .101.01 .011.05311 100 Cxi MOAN t le g fl II g s.e,6eud +epegi je Jwwmmoa, SVX31 I1SI2WH0 Slldl'!03 1O A110 I, as C Lw.n 3101.5su . mua If] muo x m SU43n1sfI Sl1y13O ONVONVIS 831)07 LLLIaO Stldlle] A Wa ti to 0141.0011 N URI LIG 44M111 z s U 4 X W 1W43r15e-,d 143)0437 /0 iu0urllOOOQ SVX31 I1S1IHJ Sfda03 JO A1I3 T;y3Hlo OM 51n170 IOWl35 Ol wrn S1M130 O VONV1S 2131VM 115110143 SrIA1103 m MJ uA . %WM sir z Eng: Murf Hudson, P.E Waterline Cost Estimate June 7, 2016 By: C.R.R. for Job No 20417.B6.00 PUBLIC GRID MAIN WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS to HARRIS ACRES BLOCK 1, LOT 1 ITEM DESCRIPTION QUAN. QUAN. + UNIT UNIT TOTAL 5% PRICE COST A. PUBLIC WATER IMPROVEMENTS: 1 12" PVC C-900 2,253 2,366 LF 530.75 $72,754.50 2 12" Gate Valve and Box 2 2 EA $3,050.00 $6,100.00 3 12"x90 Degree Ductile Iron Elbow 1 1 EA 525.00 $25.00 4 12"x45 Degree Ductile Iron Bend 2 2 EA $875.00 $1,350.00 5 12"x8" Reducer 1 1 EA $800.00 $600.00 6 Fire Hydrant Assembly Complete In-place 4 4 EA $4,595 00 $18,380.00 7 Tie to Existing Water Line 2 2 EA $1,000.00 $2,000.00 8 Bore with Eagle LOC Pipe 180 189 LF $115.00 521,735.00 9 Fence Repair (As Required) 1 1 LS 5600.00 $600.00 10 Driveway Repair (As Required) 1 1 LS $600.00 $600.00 11 Clear and Grub 1 1 LS $500.00 $500.00 12 Short Single Service Connection 1 1 EA $800.00 5800.00 PUBLIC WATER LINE SUB TOTAL: 5125,444.50 ENGINEERING, STAKING AND TESTING FEE @ 15%: $18,816.68 TOTAL ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENTS COST: $144,261.18 Water Lot/Acreage fee: $2,926.33 REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST LESS LOT/ACREAGE FEE: $141,334.85 . � %"�r`� 1. •F -a9� �� _ Y De MURRAY F, HUDSON , to" cv�r '33‘i 78198 :° ` l 0.0;.948-rsvoci# k,!(:)Aif7 9 CPO/ Urban Engineering 2725 Swantner Corpus Christi, TX 78404 1-36tia141 1 of 1 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS I. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY INSURANCE A. Contractor shall not commence work under this agreement until all insurance required herein has been obtained and approved by the City's Risk Manager or designee. Contractor must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of the subcontractor has been so obtained. B. Contractor shall furnish to the Risk Manager or designee two (2) copies of Certificates of Insurance, with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the Risk Manager or designee. The City must be listed as an additional insured for the General Liability policy and Business Auto Liability policy, and a waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -Day Notice of Cancellation required on all certificates or by policy endorsement(s) Bodily injury and Property Damage Per Occurrence / aggregate COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY I. Broad Form 2. Premises — Operations 3. Products/Completed Operations Hazard 4. Contractual Liability 5. Broad Form Property Damage 6. Independent Contractors 7. Personal and Advertising Injury 8. Professional Liability (if applicable) 9. Underground Hazard (if applicable) 10. Environmental (if applicable) $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate BUSINESS AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 1. Owned 2. Hired & Non -owned 3. Rented & Leased $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit WORKERS' COMPENSATION (for paid employees) EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY Which Complies With The Texas Workers' Compensation Act And Paragraph 11 Of This Exhibit. $500,000 / $500,000 / $500,000 PROPERTY INSURANCE Contractor shall be responsible for insuring all owned, rented, or leased personal property for all perils. C. In the event of accidents of any kind related to this project, Contractor shall furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of such accidents within ten (I 0) days of the accident. Exhibit 5 Page 1 of 3 II. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Contractor must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company in accordance with Texas law. The contract for coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The coverage provided must be in amounts sufficient to assure that all workers' compensation obligations incurred will be promptly met. An "All States endorsement shall be included for Companies not domiciled in Texas. B. Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Contractor's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. C. Contractor shall be required to submit replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Contractor shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Management P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 (361) 826-4555- Fax # D. Contractor agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • List the City and its officers, officials, employees, volunteers, and elected representatives as additional insured by endorsement, or comparable policy language, as respects to operations, completed operations and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured performed under contract with the City. • The "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and • Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation, non -renewal or material change in coverage, and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. E. City shall have the option to suspend Contractor's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. F. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Contractor's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Contractor to stop work hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. Exhibit 5 Page 2 of 3 G. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contractor's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this agreement. H. It is agreed that Contractor's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations and completed operations and activities under this agreement. I. It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. Exhibit 5 Page 3 of 3 DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". NAME: David E. and Christine L. Harris STREET: 922 Glenoak Drive CITY: Corpus Christi, Texas zip: 78418 FIRM is:OCorporation OPartnership ®Sole Owner OAssociation ()Other DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name N/A Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "fine". Name N/A Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name N/A Board, Commission, or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an `ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Consultant N/A CERTIFICATE I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested;; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person; David E. Harris Title: Owner (Print Name) Signature of Certifying Person Date: 1 1 /4/16 It1DEVELOPMENTSVCSISHAREDLLAND DEVELOPMENTAPPLICATION FORMS4REZON1NG1DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS STATEMENT 5 12.2015.DOC Exhibit 6 PAGE 1 OF 4 DEFINITIONS a. "Board Member". A member of any board, commission or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Employee". Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, either on a full or part time basis, but not as an independent contractor. c. "Firm". Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust and entities which, for purposes of taxation, are treated as non-profit organizations. d. "Official". The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers. Department and Division Heads and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. e. "Ownership Interest'. Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holding or control established through voting trusts, proxies or special terms of venture or partnership agreements. f. "Consultant". Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. K \DEVELOPMENTSVCSLSIIAREDV-AND DEVELOPMENTORDINANCE ADh11N1STRATIONAPI'UCATION FORMS,PORMS AS PER IEGALLD12WISCLOSORE OF INTERESTS STATEMENTI 27 12 DOC Exhibit 6 PAGE 2 OF DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every auestion must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". NAME: David E. and Christine L. Harris STREET: 922 Glenoak Drive CITY: Corpus Christi, Texas ZIP: 78418 FIRM is:OCorporation OPartnership ()Sole Owner OAssociation OOther DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership Interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name N/A Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name N/A Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an `ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name N/A Board, Commission, or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Consultant NIA CERTIFICATE I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement. that 1 have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Christine L. Harris Title: Owner (Print Name) � ' L Signature of Certifying Person: 1//�I.L 't_, >� a• _ Date. 1 1 /4/1 6 KIDEVELOPMENTSVCSISHARED+LAND DEVELOPMENT1APPL CATON FORMSIREZONINGIDISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS STATEMENT_5 12.2015.DOC Exhibit 6 PAGE3OF4 DEFINITIONS a. "Board Member". A member of any board, commission or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Employee". Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, either on a full or part time basis, but not as an independent contractor. c. "Firm". Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust and entities which, for purposes of taxation, are treated as non-profit organizations. d. "Official". The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. e. "Ownership interest". Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holding or control established through voting trusts, proxies or special terms of venture or partnership agreements. f. "Consultant". Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. is WEVELOr IENTSVCSSHAREOL.AN0 0EVELOPMENT\OR01NANCE AOMINISTRATIONLAPPLICATION FORMS -T RATS AS PER LEGAL\2012101SCLOSURE OF INTERESTS STATEMENTt 2712000 Exhibit 6 PAGE4OF4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1.4 and 6 if there are interested parties OFFICE USE ONLY Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties CERTIFICATION OF FILING 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place Certificate Number: of business. 2016-149332 David Harris Corpus Christi, TX United States Date Filed: 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is 1212912016 being filed. City of Corpus Christi Date Acknowledged: 4,"_ = 3 Provide the Identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. 1 Harris Acres Block 1 Lot 1- Waterline Reimbursement Agreement 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) ' Controlling Intermediary r 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. X 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. JESUS J DDMINDUEZ (*)NatuyID • 10528070 / My Commission Explrn i I D. tL - ► �`^ May 27. 2020 I Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity AFFIX NOTARY STAMP 1 SEAL ABOVE t, t1� Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said DLJ iA T 2'S this the 2 q !4~ day of yti ' U 20 11-40 to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. tir \r er I ___ J x Wk5, • �M! N hurl girrIati gnat . o 1, fficer dm istering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms pr0y(id y Texas"Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.277 Forms prided by Texas Ethttcs Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.277 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested genies Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-149333 Date Filed: 12/29/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Christine Harris Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that Is a party to the contract tor which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or Identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. 1 Harris Acres Block 1 Lot 1- Waterline Reimbursement Agreement - 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 1 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. l X fi ,,/��I I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. JESUS J DOMMIGUEI Wary ID # 10528870 My Dominion Expires letvw.„wtoz., May 27, 2020 { �' .� -' Signature of authorized a ent of contracting business entity r�r,�1_ - this the Z' ' day of I}KE141"x'- , _ AFFIX NOTARY Sworn to and subscribed 20,].10, to STAMP / SEAL ABOVE /1 before me, by the said C (577^ certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. 3t5v1s J • %v(1+J(allet. Aldi-n-4,1 gnagJre 1 f o icer atfnin • tering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath -` Forms prided by Texas Ethttcs Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.277 Vicinity Map VICINITY MAP HARRIS ACRES, BLOCK 1, LOT 1 1 Aerial Overview e AERIAL OVERVIEW HARRIS ACRES, BLOCK 1, LOT 1 t N 2 Aerial AERIAL MAP HARRIS ACRES, BLOCK 1, LOT 1 3 AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading for the City Council Meeting of January 17, 2017 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 DATE: TO: December 28, 2016 Margie C. Rose, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager MarkVV@cctexas.com (361) 826-3082 FROM: Valerie H. Gray, P.E., Executive Director, Public Works ValerieG@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 J. H. Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Stacie Talbert-Anaya, Interim Director Parks & Recreation StacieT@cctexas.com (361) 826-3476 Accepting and Appropriating Two Donations North Beach Breakwater Plaza, North Shoreline Repair and Enhancement Project Bond 2012, Proposition 8 CAPTION: Ordinance accepting and appropriating a donation in the amount of $25,000 from the USS Lexington and a donation in the amount of $25,000 from the Texas State Aquarium in Fund No. 3530 for the North Beach Breakwater Plaza, North Shoreline Repair and Enhancement Project E12129; Changing the FY 2017 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030936 to increase revenues and expenditures by $50,000. (Bond 2012, Proposition 8) PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is to accept and appropriate two donations in the amount of $25,000 each in the North Beach Breakwater Plaza, North Shoreline Repair and Enhancement Project E12129. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: This project is part of Bond 2012 Proposition 8 — Economic Development Projects. North Beach Breakwater Plaza, North Shoreline Repair and Enhancement: "This project includes repairs, resurfacing, safety improvements and pedestrian amenities to the sidewalk along the Breakwater Structure. North Shoreline on -street parking enhancement and pedestrian improvements are included in addition to enhancements at Breakpoint Area Plaza. This project is being designed and constructed with the North Beach Area Road Improvements and Beautification Project to reduce costs and accomplish project objectives. This project is also being coordinated with the Texas State Aquarium, the USS Lexington, and other North Beach businesses for private funding to further maximize resources." The donations from the USS Lexington and Texas State Aquarium are the funds being leveraged to enhance the Bond 2012, Proposition 8 project for improvements to North Beach Breakwater Plaza, North Shoreline Repair and Enhancement. The USS Lexington has requested their donation be specifically used to enhance lighting in some capacity. To comply with this request, the City has entered into a small professional services agreement with Maldonado -Burkett Intelligent Transportation Systems, LLP (MBITS) of Corpus Christi, Texas to determine the lighting necessary for street lighting, as well as pedestrian lighting, and the optimal locations for each. The lighting improvements for North Beach will be located along North Shoreline from Pearl Avenue to Coastal Avenue and in the Breakwater Plaza. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Accept and appropriate the donations from the USS Lexington and Texas State Aquarium into the project. (Recommended). 2. Do not accept and appropriate the donations from the USS Lexington and Texas State Aquarium into the project. (Not Recommended). OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: • In November 2012 city voters approved Proposition 8 which included: o North Beach Breakwater Plaza, North Shoreline Repair and Enhancement - Project E12129 o North Area Road Improvements and Area Beautification - Project 12127 o July 19, 2016 - The City executed a design contract with LJA Engineering for design of both projects. o December 21, 2016 — Engineering Services Received 60% plan submittals. o Both projects will be constructed together and the expected construction start date will be September 2017 after Labor Day to avoid the tourist season. • The Scope of the two projects includes: o North Beach Breakwater Plaza, North Shoreline Repair and Enhancement — Project E12127: Installation of curb ramps along the east side of Surfside Blvd. between Burleson St. and Coastal Ave., pavement reclamation on North Shoreline from Pearl Ave to Coastal Ave, new pavement markings and incidental utility improvements. (Originally pavement reclamation of Breakwater Avenue, Bridgeport Avenue, and Coastal Avenue were part of this project, however these improvements will now be done as part of the City's Street Preventative Maintenance Program) o North Area Road Improvements and Area Beautification - Project E12129: This project includes the installation of pedestrian and parking improvements along North Shoreline between Pearl Avenue and Bridgeport Avenue, including existing curb and gutter modifications, new sidewalks and curb ramps, new pavement markings and limited utility improvements in the area. The project also includes paving Breakwater Plaza and repairs to the concrete cap along the breakwater structure. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Conforms to statutes regarding acceptance and appropriation of funds; FY 2016-2017 Capital Budget. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Parks and Recreation FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue X Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Project to Date Budget and Expenditures Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered/Expended Amount This item 50,000 50,000 Future Anticipated Expenditures This Project Future Anticipated Revenues BALANCE 50,000 50,000 Fund(s): Donations Comments: N/A RECOMMENDATION: City Staff recommends approval of the item as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Location Map Ordinance accepting and appropriating a donation in the amount of $25,000 from the USS Lexington and a donation in the amount of $25,000 from the Texas State Aquarium in Fund No. 3530 for the North Beach Breakwater Plaza, North Shoreline Repair and Enhancement Project E12129; Changing the FY 2017 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030936 to increase revenues and expenditures by $50,000. (Bond 2012, Proposition 8) BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. A donation is accepted from the USS Lexington in the amount of $25,000 and appropriated into Fund 3530 for Project E12129 North Beach Breakwater Plaza, North Shoreline Repair and Enhancement. (Bond 2012, Proposition 8) SECTION 2. A donation is accepted from the Texas State Aquarium in the amount of $25,000 and appropriated into Fund 3530 for Project E12129 North Beach Breakwater Plaza, North Shoreline Repair and Enhancement. (Bond 2012, Proposition 8) SECTION 3. The FY 2017 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030936 is amended to add $50,000 in donations for Project E12129 North Beach Breakwater Plaza, North Shoreline Repair and Enhancement. (Bond 2012, Proposition 8) SECTION 4. Revenues and expenditures in the amount of $50,000 are increased in the FY 2017 Capital Improvement Budget adopted by Ordinance No 030936. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Dan McQueen Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Joe McComb That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Dan McQueen Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Joe McComb PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Dan McQueen Mayor market N vigati' 'i 13.1w1 Pr .Port Ave American 6.anik Center ei o. o Corpus F2 Zfr e/6 a• 44 T -PYP ! 1 RA P EFL "Wla hatnu rger Fid Ma z ri- IZU ICINIT MAP 1 Cr --- Cr B-- ..NOP TO SCALE Pr❑i ill❑❑ ❑A^: E1212❑ ❑ E1212❑ North Beach Area Road Improvements and Area Beautification Bond 2012 Prop 8 CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of January 31, 2017 DATE: December 29, 2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Daniel McGinn, AICP, CFM, Assistant Director of Planning/ESI DanielMc@cctexas.com (361) 826-7011 Public Hearing and First Reading to adopt the proposed Mustang/Padre Area Development Plan CAPTION: Ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Corpus Christi by adopting the Mustang/Padre Island Area Development Plan; defining the City's Comprehensive Plan policies on Mustang and Padre Island for protection of the environment, land use, transportation, economic development, public services, capital improvements, and plan implementation; rescinding the Mustang/Padre Island Area Development Plan adopted by City Council Ordinance #025725, April 20, 2004; providing for severance; and providing for publication. PURPOSE: The current Mustang/Padre Area Development Plan (ADP) was adopted on April 20, 2004 as an element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Island Strategic Action Committee (ISAC), in 2016, adopted as a high priority the development of a plan update for the Mustang/Padre area. The ISAC formed a Planning Subcommittee to review and recommend revisions to the existing plan. The Padre Isles Property Owners Association and the Padre Island Business Association supported the planning process by providing funds for clerical work associated with drafting plan revisions/planning meetings, etc. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Since the Mustang/Padre Island Area Development Plan was adopted over ten years ago there are many plan elements in need of revision. The proposed Mustang/Padre Island ADP still contains the same structure as the previous plan. Each section in the Plan, from the Introduction through Plan Implementation Section, has been reviewed with proposed revision input from the ISAC Subcommittee. On July 30, 2016, the Subcommittee held a public open house for citizens to review and discuss the plan. At the September 13, 2016, meeting of the Island Strategic Action Committee, the committee recommended that the updated plan be adopted by City Council. On September 20, 2016, the Chairman of the ISAC, advised City Council, during public comment that the updated Mustang/Padre Island Area Development Plan was ready for the formal Planning Commission public hearing/action and City Council public hearing and action. On December 14, 2016, the Planning Commission, as required by City Charter and state statute, conducted a public hearing to invite public comment on the proposed plan. The major goals and policies of the updated Plan address the following: • Encourage protection of coastal resources; • Encourage an expanded canal system for better water exchange; • Implement the Future Land Use map; • Encourage high quality well-planned development on the island; • Encourage the use of buffer zones around residential developments for compatible land use purposes; • Encourage the City to consider the long term "ultimate" street network to serve a fully developed plan area; • Revise the collector street system on Mustang Island where the State purchased land to expand Mustang Island State Park; • Encourage walking, cycling and golf carts as alternate forms of transportation; • Support emergency egress off the island, including a second crossing of the Laguna Madre; • Develop solutions to address access and traffic congestion on SH 361 and PK 22 and improve beach access; • Promote Economic development policies that address the need to encourage tourism and residential growth, which include: continued maintenance of the Packery Channel; and endorsement for the completion of the new bridge on Park Road 22; • Develop Public Services policies that stress the need to continue a high quality beach maintenance program, pursue park development funds, adopt stormwater master plan, and support for facility development related to water, wastewater and other infrastructure; • Identify Capital Improvements recommendations include the need to create a specific Beach Utilization Master Plan for all gulf beaches, additional boat ramps on Mustang and North Padre Island; improvement of unimproved but dedicated streets such as San Dollar, Tortugas and Palmira Avenue; and, • Create, where feasible, a Public Improvement District to finance capital improvements. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Denial of the proposed Mustang/Padre Island Area Development Plan with suggestions to Planning Commission and the Island Strategic Action Committee. 2. Adoption with changes per City Council. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The proposed amendment conforms to City policy. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Island Strategic Action Committee — recommended approval on September 13, 2016 Development Services, Planning and ESI Administration Planning Commission — recommended approval on December 14, 2016 FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital X Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Comments: None. RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends adoption of the proposed Mustang/Padre Area Development Plan LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Presentation Ordinance with Proposed Plan Exhibit ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI BY ADOPTING THE MUSTANG/PADRE ISLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN; DEFINING THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES ON MUSTANG AND PADRE ISLAND FOR PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT, LAND USE, TRANSPORTATION, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, PUBLIC SERVICES, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, AND PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; RESCINDING THE MUSTANG/PADRE ISLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE #025725, APRIL 20, 2004; PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its reports and recommendations concerning the adoption of the Mustang/Padre Island Area Development Plan, an element of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Corpus Christi; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, December 14, 2016, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, January 24, 2017, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that these amendments would best serve public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Mustang/Padre Island Area Development Plan (a part of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas), including the City's Comprehensive Plan policies on Mustang and Padre Island for protection of the Environment, Land Use, Transportation, Economic Development, Public Services, Capital Improvements, and Plan Implementation, and the Introduction, Policy Statements, Figures, Tables, and all other elements and parts of the Mustang/Padre Island Area Development Plan, are adopted by this ordinance as an integral part of the Comprehensive Plan to read as shown in Exhibit "A" attached to this ordinance and incorporated by reference. SECTION 2. That to the extent that the amendments made by this Ordinance represent a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the amendments made by this Ordinance. SECTION 3. That the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance and any other ordinances adopted on this date, remains in full force and effect. SECTION 4. That the Mustang/Padre Island Area Development Plan adopted by City Council Ordinance #025725, April 20, 2004, is hereby rescinded. SECTION 5. That any ordinance or part of any ordinance in conflict with this ordinance is expressly repealed by this ordinance. SECTION 6. The City Council intends that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision hereof shall be given full force and effect for its purpose. Therefore, if any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, that judgment shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance. SECTION 7. Publication shall be made in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi as required by the City Charter of the City of Corpus Christi. The foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 20 , by the following vote: Dan McQueen Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Joe McComb That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Dan McQueen Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Joe McComb PASSED AND APPROVED on this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Dan McQueen Mayor Mustang/Padre Area Development Plan Adopted Month Day, 2017 Exhibit A of City Chnsti Mustang/Padre Island Area Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page i MUSTANG/PADRE AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN Adopted by City Council Ordinance #025725, April 20, 2004; Amended by City Council Ordinance # , Month , 2017 The preparation of this document was financed in part by a Community Development Block Grant from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and a Metropolitan Planning Organization grant from the Federal Highway Administration. Michael T. Hunter At Large Joe McComb At Large Paulette Guajardo At Large Corpus Christi City Council 2017 Mayor Dan McQueen Carolyn Vaughn District 1 Ben Molina District 2 Lucy Rubio District 3 Greg Smith District 4 Rudy Garza District 5 Corpus Christi Planning Commission Philip Ramirez, Chairman Jeremy Baugh Heidi Hovda Carl Crull Mike Lippincott Frank Hastings Dan Dibble Eric Villarreal, Vice Chair Marsha Williams Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page ii Island Strategic Action Committee Brud Jones, III David Perry William Goldston Jodi Steen Alex Harris Libby Middleton Rick Sowash Carter L. Tate, CCIM Stan Huse Aaron B. Huffman Kathleen Pratt Charles I. Knoll Cheri Sperling Bryan Gully Paulette Kluge Jay Gardner Island Strategic Action Planning Subcommittee Libby Edwards Greg Smith William Goldston Maybeth Christensen Brud Jones Gabrielle Hilpold Rick Sowash JJ Hart Jodi Steen Carter L. Tate, CCIM Kendra Kinnison City Staff Margie Rose, City Manager Miles Risley, City Attorney Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager Julio Dimas, Interim Development Services Director Daniel McGinn, CFM, AICP, Assistant Director of Planning/ESI Administration Kent Meek, Executive Assistant to ACM Annika Gunning, Senior Project Manager Jeremy Mecom, GIS IT Team Coordinator Bob Payne, AICP, Planning Consultant Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page iii Significant contributions to development of this Plan were also made by: Paul Schexnailder Gaye White David Pierce Nicole Davis Chemaine Koester David Perez Tommy Kurtz Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page iv Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 POPULATION 3 INCOME 5 HOUSING 5 CURRENT LAND USE 5 AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN PLANNING PROCESS 8 STAKEHOLDER AND CITIZEN INPUT 9 A. ENVIRONMENT 10 B. LAND USE 13 OVERALL LAND USE PLAN POLICY STATEMENTS 13 ZAHN ROAD TO THE SOUTH CITY LIMITS 17 ZAHN ROAD TO NORTH CITY LIMITS 17 JOHN F. KENNEDY (JFK) CAUSEWAY AREA 18 C. TRANSPORTATION 19 BEACH ACCESS 24 EXISTING BEACH ACCESS 24 D. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 27 E. PUBLIC SERVICES 33 PARKS & RECREATION 33 PUBLIC SAFETY 34 STREETS 34 STORMWATER SYSTEM 34 WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS 35 F. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 36 PARK AND RECREATION 36 PUBLIC SAFETY 37 STREETS 37 STORMWATER 38 WATER AND WASTEWATER 38 G. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 39 Figures Figure 1: Plan Boundaries 2 Figure 2: Corpus Christi Population 4 Figure 3: Mustang/Padre Island Population 4 Figure 4: Padre Island Existing Land Use 6 Figure 5: Mustang Island Existing Land Use 8 Figure 6: Future Land Use 14 Figure 7: Urban Transportation Plan (excerpt) 21 Figure 8: Bikeway Network (excerpt of City Network) 22 Figure 9: Removal of Proposed Collector West of SH 361 23 Figure 10: Packery Channel 29 Figure 11: Padre Island Tax Increment Financing District 30 Figure 12: Packery Channel Enhancements 32 Appendix Appendix 1: Island Overlay .42 Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This updated 2017 Mustang -Padre Island Area Development Plan contains the following recommendations: ENVIRONMENT Encourage protection of the coastal resources; Encourage an expanded canal system for better water exchange; and Maintain Packery Channel. LAND USE Implement the Corpus Christi Padre -Mustang Island Future Land Use Map; Encourage well-planned development; Encourage additional beach access roads and nearby public parking; and Encourage buffer zones around residential developments. TRANSPORTATION Amend the Corpus Christi Urban Transportation Plan to an "ultimate" street network to serve a fully developed plan area; Delete a collector street west of SH 361 and north of Mustang Island State Park; The City's Access Management study will examine the impact of traffic flow on Sand Dollar, currently a paper street; Encourage walking, cycling and golf carts as alternate forms of transportation; Encourage sufficient long-term emergency egress off the islands, including a second crossing of the Laguna Madre; Develop solutions to address access and traffic congestion along SH 361 and PR22; and Improve beach access. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT The beach is a major driver in tourism and residential development for the area; Continue to support tourism and residential growth, including retirement growth; Packery Channel offers passage to the Gulf and is a resource of sand for beach maintenance. The channel is and must continue to be maintained via the TIRZ #2; and The PR 22 Bridge nearing construction will stimulate retail development and enhance water exchange into Padre Isles. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page vi PUBLIC SERVICES Ensure sufficient funding for beach operations, maintenance and sustainable access through various sources; Pursue funding for park development; Develop a specific Beach Utilization Master Plan; Encourage festival sites on the islands for large events; Develop additional boat ramps; Develop a multi -use meeting facility; Provide adequate public safety facilities on the Islands; Establish a plan for street maintenance; Adopt a Stormwater Master Plan for the Islands; Continue to place a high priority on providing an adequate water supply to the Islands to support rapid growth; Support and facilitate a public improvement district to provide water, wastewater and other public infrastructure for development of unpaved streets; The City will continue to use effluent from the Whitecap Wastewater Treatment Plant to benefit the Islands; and Continue to work with the Nueces County Water Improvement District to ensure adequate services in the district. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Establish continuous funding sources and foster multiple partnerships for ongoing capital improvements on the islands. Parks and Recreation: Create a Specific Beach Utilization Master Plan for all Gulf Beaches, Packery Channel, and shoreline areas adjacent to the Laguna Madre and Corpus Christi Bay; Create new boat ramps on Mustang Island, Kleberg County and other viable alternatives; and Billish Park is currently being upgraded. All other parks need improvements. Public Services: Facilitate improvements for alternative modes of transportation including along SPID and at major intersections; Landscaping and alternative transportation modes should be constructed in the public rights- of-way on major streets; Improve Sand Dollar, Tortugas, Palmira and other dedicated but unimproved streets; Adopt a Stormwater Master Plan for the Islands; and Establish a public improvement district to finance the construction of infrastructure to platted properties along SPID. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page vii PLAN MISSION STATEMENT The ultimate goal of this plan is to guide the transformation of the Mustang/Padre Island area into a world-renowned tourist, resort and residential community. The City will encourage the highest development standards within the area's boundaries to create a unique "sense of place." Economic development and growth will be tempered with common sense and environmental sensitivity to the significant coastal natural resources on the Islands. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 1 Mustang/Padre Island Area Development Plan INTRODUCTION The City of Corpus Christi envisions Mustang/Padre Island as a regional, national, and international resort destination. The recreational amenities, leisure and resort facilities, and residential communities will be among the finest along the entire Gulf Coast. Moreover, the recreational opportunities will appeal to a broad socioeconomic range of clientele, allowing all to enjoy what Mustang/Padre Island has to offer. Whether for sport fishing, beach combing, wind and kite surfing or rest and relaxation, visitors will want to return again and again. The character of the residential neighborhoods will attract new residents who appreciate what the area has to offer. Visitors and residents alike will come to appreciate the unique sense of place created through requiring the highest quality of development. This vision will make Mustang/Padre Island a preeminent destination of the Gulf Coast and a brilliant asset to our sparkling city. The City Charter mandates the Corpus Christi Comprehensive Plan. The Charter requires the City Council to "... establish comprehensive planning as a continuous governmental function to guide, regulate, and manage future development . . . "and that " . . . all city improvements, ordinances, and regulations shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan . . . ". The Comprehensive Plan is comprised of various plan elements such as Policy Statements, Area Development Plans (ADP's), Capital Improvement Programs, and Master Utility Plans. The comprehensive planning process is a means for citizens and community leaders to guide community development. The Comprehensive Plan, by definition, is general, long range, and broad in scope. Its purpose is to guide the City in policy formulation and in the implementation of strategies related to population, housing, environment, land use, transportation, annexation, economic development and public services. As part of the planning process, planning staff developed the Mustang/Padre Island Area Development Plan Issues Report based upon the input of the Mustang/Padre Island Stakeholders Group. This document was used to identify the important issues related to the ADP. The Mustang/Padre Island Area is located in the easternmost part of the City, offshore from the mainland. The Plan area is bounded by Port Aransas on the north, the Gulf of Mexico on the east, Padre Island National Seashore on the south and the Laguna Madre and Corpus Christi Bay to the west. The area also includes the John F. Kennedy Causeway. (See Figure 1 - Boundary Map.) Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 2 Figure 1: Plan Boundaries Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 3 The principle objectives of this plan are as follows: 1) To recognize the unique characteristics of this area and establish policies for development standards that may not apply citywide. 2) To recognize the regional economic significance of this area and develop policies that advocate responsible economic development strategies. 3) To propose techniques or methods by which the environmentally sensitive areas must be preserved and/or developed with minimal adverse impacts. 4) To propose appropriate land uses and a corresponding transportation network to serve future land uses and public access to the Gulf beaches. 5) To facilitate infrastructure planning through a reasonable estimate of future land use. DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS (U.S. Census Bureau) POPULATION This area is the one of the fastest growing areas in the City. Figures 2 and 3 illustrate population growth in Corpus Christi as a whole and within the Mustang/Padre Island Area. These figures include actual census counts projections through 2050. Area population growth is significantly influenced by land availability and density of development. Being an island, with significant amounts of natural resources, land availability is limited. A comparison of population between the City and the Island (Figures 2 and 3) indicates that the rate of growth on the island has been much faster than the City as a whole and is expected to continue to at least 2050.The historical growth rate over the last 20 years has been about 1% per year for the City while the growth rate for the island has been about 10% per year. With the construction of Packery Channel and the opening of Schlitterbahn Water Park, development is expected to rise sharply through the next 20 — 30 years. Over the next 20 years much of the vacant areas on North Padre and Mustang Island will fill-in, such as the undeveloped portions of Padre Isles west of Schlitterbahn/Aquarius Drive, the Lake Padre area and land along the seawall. South of Padre Isles is the "Jones Tract" which contains about 1,200 acres of private undeveloped land, nearly as large an area as Padre Isles. The anticipated increase in development is primarily due to the overall economic growth in the State, as well as planned future amenities on the Islands. The demographic makeup of the Mustang/Padre Island Area is not consistent with that of Corpus Christi. Within the area, about 70% of the population is in the 21 — 64 year age group. Meanwhile, the City has about 60% of the population in the same age group. The 0 — 20 year age group makes up about 15% of the Mustang/Padre population, as compared to about 29% for Corpus Christi's population. This is indicative of the area's status as a resort community. The bulk of the population is working age adults, with fewer children than the remainder of the City. Also, there is a slightly higher percentage of retirement age (65+) individuals within the area (17%) than the rest of the City (12%). The proportion of households with children citywide is about 36%. Meanwhile, within the area, only about 17% of households have children. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 4 CORPUS CHRISTI POPULATION 204,525 231,999 257,453 277,454 304,895 332,336 359,777 387,218 414,659 1 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Figure 2: Corpus Christi Population MUSTANG/PADRE ISLAND POPULATION 2,941 6,444 9,235 14,444 18,444 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Figure 3: Mustang/Padre Island Population Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 5 EDUCATION Educational attainment for individuals age 25 and over differs greatly between the area and Corpus Christi. Citywide, about 15% lack a high school diploma or equivalent. That statistic is about 5% for the area. About 54% of Mustang/Padre residents have a bachelor's degree or higher. In contrast, only about 21% of Corpus Christi residents have a bachelor's degree or higher. INCOME Median household income in the area is significantly higher and the poverty level is significantly lower than the remainder of the City. The median household income in Mustang/Padre is about $95,871, while that of Corpus Christi is about $49,675. Also, less than 5% of households in the area live below the poverty level, as compared to the City's 13%. HOUSING According to the 2014 American Community Survey, 10.5% of the total housing units citywide were vacant. For the island, 34.7% of the total housing units were vacant. This is largely due to the preponderance of seasonal housing units in the Mustang/Padre Area. While a figure for seasonal housing units is not provided in the 2014 ACS, the 2010 Census did show that 23.6% of the total housing on the island is for seasonal, recreational, or occasional use. This information suggests that vacancy rates on the island are typical of the city's vacancy rate. There is a significant difference in median home values between citywide values and Mustang/Padre Island. Citywide median home values (Texas A&M Real Estate Center) have increased from $155,169 in 2011 to 195,275 in 2015, or a 27% increase. The American Community Survey shows that the island census tract had a median home value of $284,900 in 2011. Assuming a 27% increase the median value of a home on the island is likely to be at least $360,000 or higher. The difference in price goes back to that old real estate phrase "location, location, location" and the favored value of living on the gulf coast. CURRENT LAND USE Figures 4 and 5 illustrate the existing land uses on the Island and Table 1 provides a break down for land use acreages by category. For the first time, the city can also track land use changes between 2004 and 2016. The total study 2016 area contains 27,751 acres which is slightly less compared with the 2004 Plan as less water area has been included in the plan boundary. The Low Density Residential uses have experienced an increase of over 50% since 2004. The Medium Density Residential use category has also expanded, however a portion (about 13 acres) of that expansion is due to a reclassification of High Density uses to Medium Density since 2004. Clearly, the Park category is far and away the biggest use of land on the island with over 16,000 acres reserved for park or recreation uses. The reduction in Park land of several hundred acres since 2004 is the conversion of the Padre Isles Golf Course to the commercial use category, i.e., Schlitterbahn Development. As expected the vacant land use was reduced slightly due to new development but still contains approximately 20% of the total land in the study area. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 6 Laguna Madre Corpus Christi Bay Guff of Mexico 0.5 1 EXISTING LAND USE Agriculture Water M Cons/Pres —1 Drainage Corridor CI -Railroad Right -of --Way Vacant —1 Estate Res Low Density Res Medium Density Res - High Density Res Mobile Horne I. Park - Public/Semi-Puttc , 1 Professional Office Commercial Light Industrial - Heavy Industrial 2 Miles Figure 4: Padre Island Existing Land Use Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 7 xi+wo tea IAN -1•6+ Aramihrr %11 Cdrokflm [I — tn *601-0,04,—UMW oaxma, P400012400,41 4.461 e a„Noigsliwaftic wile.0100roftli• MI commons Figure 5: Mustang Island Existing Land Use Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 8 Table 1: Existing Land Use Existing Land Use 2004 0�0 2016 Low Density Residential Medium Density High Density Residential Mobile Homes Professional Office Commercial Light Industrial Heavy Industrial Park Public Semi Public Right -of -Way V acant/Agriculture Water/Wetlands/Beach 440 1.6% 680 2.5% 84 0.3% 161 0.6% 105 0.4% 87 0.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 0.0% 6 0.0% 107 0.4% 335 1.2% 5 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 104 0.4% 16,118 58.1% 16,058 57.9% 66 0.2% 57 0.2% 754 2.7% 822 3.0% 5,973 21.5% 5,346 19.3% 4,094 14.8% 4,094 14.8% 27,751 100.0% 27,751 100.0% Note: Acreages for the 2016 Existing Land Uses have been adjusted to match the 2014 plan boundary. The Figure 1, 2016 Study Area Boundary Map includes a larger water area that has not been included in the above table so that land acreage development could be compared. The Conservation/Preservation category has been combined with Water/Wetlands/Beach and the Estate Residential category has been combined with Low Density Residential. For this plan a calculation for the area of the Gulf Beach, measured from the Line of Vegetation seaward to Mean High Tide, was estimated to be 445 acres. AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN PLANNING PROCESS The purpose of the 2016 planning process for the Mustang/Padre Island Plan was to update the existing plan rather than create a whole new plan. The City has committed to budget funds in 2017 for the creation of a new Plan. One of the major recommendations of the 2004 Mustang/Padre Island Plan was to create a neighborhood committee to help shepherd the implementation of the adopted plan. Shortly after Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 9 adoption of the 2004 Plan, City Council established the Island Strategic Action Committee which has taken a leading role in this plan update. The planning process for the Mustang/Padre Island Area Development Plan consists of the following steps: 1. The Creation of an Island Strategic Action (ISAC) subcommittee to work with City Staff and Stakeholders to formulate an update to the Plan. 2. The ISAC ADP Subcommittee formulates planning process and schedule for plan update and begins inventory of land use, infrastructure, etc. 3. Subcommittee, which includes Staff and Stakeholders identifies island issues to be addressed in the plan. 4. Subcommittee drafts the Plan updated to address issues of concern. 5. ISAC presents draft Plan to Islands Stakeholder Group for review and comment. 6. Subcommittee revises draft Plan based on Stakeholder Group input. 7. Subcommittee presents the revised draft Plan to the ISAC and ISAC recommends a revised plan for City Council Adoption. 8. The revised draft Plan is presented to Planning Commission for public hearing input. The Planning Commission revises the plan if necessary and then recommends City Council approval of revised draft Plan. 9. The revised draft Plan is presented to City Council for public hearing input. The draft Plan is revised, if necessary, based on recommendation by City Council and Plan is approved. STAKEHOLDER AND CITIZEN INPUT A primary goal of the planning process is to obtain input from citizens interested in the Mustang/Padre Island Area and from stakeholder groups. Stakeholder groups and professions that have been involved in the planning process include: o Padre Isles Owners Association o Padre Island Business Association o Corpus Christi Chamber of Commerce o Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority o Convention and Visitors Bureau o Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization o Water Shore Advisory Committee o Architects o Engineers o Real Estate Professionals o Nueces County o Business Owners o Property Owners o Residents o City Staff e.g., Engineering Services, Park and Recreation, Marina, Public Works (Utilities), and Development Services. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 10 A. ENVIRONMENT Preservation and protection of the Islands' ecology is critical to the public health, safety and welfare of the Corpus Christi community and entire region. The Islands' ecology, including the Gulf beach, dunes complex, and wetlands areas, provides significant benefits to the rest of the region. It is a well-known fact that the Islands' beaches and dunes complex provides the first line of defense to the mainland from hurricane storm surges. The Islands' wetlands and estuaries provide an aquatic environment to support many species of fish and shellfish for sport and commercial fishing. In addition, the unique beauty and recreational opportunities of the Islands, specifically the beach areas, benefit the local and regional economy significantly. Tourism studies have shown that the Gulf beaches are the number one tourist attraction to the Corpus Christi area by visitors from both inside and outside of the State. In order to balance the need to protect the coastal natural resources of the Islands and to promote economic development on the Islands, the following recommendations are proposed. Some of the recommendations are being implemented by other governmental agencies, i.e. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Nueces County, State of Texas, etc. The Plan recommendations are intended to assure City support and are not intended to substitute or establish an overlap or duplication of authority. POLICY STATEMENT A.1 Gulf beaches between mean low tide and the line of vegetation must contain no structures or improvements except erosion control measures and limited public recreational structures that support public access, including, but not limited to, life guard towers, fishing/surfing piers, open- air public showers, portable restrooms and traffic control devices. POLICY STATEMENT A.2 Due to the complexity of the Islands development and the need to protect environmentally sensitive areas, the City recommends an interdisciplinary site plan review process for all commercial and multi -family residential development on the Islands, in conjunction with the issuance of building permits. All projects on the Islands shall be compliant with all local, State and Federal requirements and executed in accordance with best practices. POLICY STATEMENT A.3 Mustang and Padre Islands will not be considered for sanitary landfills or other solid waste disposal, except for dredge materials. POLICY STATEMENT A.4 The design and use of naturally regenerating systems for prevention and control of beach dune erosion are encouraged and preferred over bulkheads and other hard structures provided the protection system is a reasonable solution to the site where it is proposed. Regenerating systems include, but are not limited to: A) Beach nourishment; Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 11 B) Adapted beach management practices; C) Planting with short-term mechanical assistance, when appropriate; and D) Any other method consistent with the recommendations of the Texas General Land Office's Dune Protection and Improvement Manual for the Texas Gulf Coast. POLICY STATEMENT A.5 The City will encourage the protection of sensitive wildlife habitats and the Islands' environment by considering innovative design techniques, implementation of incentives for developers and allowing higher than typical development density in uplands where practical. It is not the intent of this plan to initiate requirements for protection of non jurisdictional wetlands. The City encourages any developer to voluntarily preserve the existing natural environment by concentrating the total number of units allowed, based on gross acreage (including wetlands) into a multi -story building or buildings. This "cluster development" results in large setbacks, buffer zones, reduced infrastructure costs and more permanent open space. POLICY STATEMENT A.6 The City should develop a revision to the landscape requirements in the Zoning Ordinance to create an indigenous species and wetlands allowance for landscaping on the barrier islands. New development may incorporate natural wetlands and vegetation to partially satisfy landscape requirements where such features can meet the screening performance criteria. POLICY STATEMENT A.7 Encourage development of an expanded canal system, including the bridge on SPID, to connect Lake Padre/Packery Channel with the existing Padre Isles Subdivision. The expanded canal system is consistent with proposed developer plans and would benefit Padre Island in several ways as follows: A) Improve canal system water quality in Padre Isles; B) Improve surface drainage along SPID, i.e. a canal system parallel to SPID could provide outfalls for storm drainage along the roadway; C) Provide a convenient water transportation system for small watercraft between the Padre Isles residential area and future commercial development in Lake Padre/Packery Channel POLICY STATEMENT A.8 Development should be consistent with the Joint Erosion Response Plan for Nueces County and the City of Corpus Christi. POLICY STATEMENT A.9 The City will continue streamlining the process for permitting. POLICY STATEMENT A.10 Encourage use of native coastal plant species and discourage the use of invasive species. POLICY STATEMENT A.11 Encourage development of future expanded canal systems on North Padre Island and Mustang Island. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 12 POLICY STATEMENT A.12 Continue ongoing maintenance of the Packery Channel as it is a valuable resource for material to re -nourish the beach. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 13 B. LAND USE OVERALL LAND USE PLAN POLICY STATEMENTS PLAN STATEMENT B.1 The City's adopted citywide Future Land Use Plan map is a guide for future land use decisions concerning zoning, capital improvements and any land disturbing activity in the City and the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. An excerpt from the Citywide Future Land Use map for the Mustang/Padre Island Area is shown on Figure 6 .1 For the Mustang/Padre Island area the intent of the Future Land Use Plan is to support environmentally sound, high-density tourist related growth, medium density mixed uses and the growing permanent residential neighborhood on the Islands. The plan provides for a compatible configuration of activities with emphasis on the protection of residential lifestyle from incompatible activities, the placement of commercial activity at locations with good access and high visibility, and the identification of environmentally sensitive areas that should be protected. POLICY STATEMENT B.2 Tourist oriented business and development will continue to be encouraged and promoted by all agencies of the City as illustrated on the Future Land Use Map. This includes commercial ventures, condominiums and resorts, fishing and outdoor recreation facilities, and recreational vehicle parks outside the current Island Overlay (See Appendix A). POLICY STATEMENT B.3 Development that is visible from designated arterial thoroughfares must have a well-planned urban design theme creating a sense of place, enhancing the visitor experience and the overall quality of life. POLICY STATEMENT B.4 To create a unique sense of place, the Islands' landscape requirements for street yards adjacent to SPID and SH361 will be of a higher standard than is typically required elsewhere in the City. Variances, special permits, or other means to reduce the landscaping requirements for development in this Plan Area will be discouraged. POLICY STATEMENT B.5 Signage requirements should promote a coordinated and cohesive design and reinforce a desirable identity of the Islands. POLICY STATEMENT B.6 Encourage placement of public art on roadway medians and other public or private properties. 1 The Future Land Use Plan contained in this ADP may be generalized and incorporated into the City's Citywide Future Land Use Plan. If there is any conflict between the Future Land Use in this ADP and the City's generalized Future Land Use Plan, then ADP Future Land Use shall supersede. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 14 Mixed Use Planned Development Commercial Government Institutional Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Transportation Permanent Open Space Flood Plain Conservation Water Planning District Figure 6: Future Land Use Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 15 POLICY STATEMENT B.7 The designation of "Mixed Use" in the Future Land Use Plan expresses the City's desire to mix residential and non-residential uses. Development objectives for the Mixed Use categories are to incorporate the latest design innovations, the highest quality construction, integrated land uses, a safe and efficient transportation network, and pedestrian, golf cart and bicycle amenities. A "Mixed Use" area should be developed using a PUD zoning district or other equivalent zoning category. A) Mixed use/residential -A high percentage of land designated for Mixed Use Residential should be developed for residential purposes. Low density neighborhood -serving businesses may also be appropriate (no more than 10% of the area). Clustering of development density with large setbacks or permanent reserves of open space may also be acceptable in combination with high density uses, provided high density uses are integrated into the surrounding neighborhood and any negative impacts are eliminated or mitigated. B) Mixed use/tourist - The mixed use tourist land use is characterized by high density residential and high density business uses. High density business uses may range in character between either serving the region or be targeted to the island population. Uses may include bed and breakfasts, hotels, condominiums, marinas/vessel repair and maintenance, convention facilities, ancillary commercial uses, etc., along SPID, SH361, seawall and Gulf of Mexico. POLICY STATEMENT B.8 Work to create a conveniently located permanent Islands visitor center. POLICY STATEMENT B.9 he City will continue to protect residential neighborhoods from encroachment of non-residential uses by requiring non-residential uses to mitigate any negative effects on adjacent neighborhoods. POLICY STATEMENT B.10 Industrial uses and sexually oriented uses are incompatible with and may threaten residential land uses, the natural environment and the family tourist orientation of the Islands. Oil and gas exploration and production is exempted from this policy, where allowed by law, provided all pertinent requirements are met. POLICY STATEMENT B.11 Manufactured homes are prohibited on the Islands. POLICY STATEMENT B.12 Utility lines will be placed underground, where practical, and will minimize disturbance of wetlands, dunes, or other sensitive habitats and wildlife. This will improve the aesthetics of the area and improve public safety, particularly in times of weather emergencies. A) The installation of new electrical, telephone or other utility lines, where practical, along expressways, arterials, and collector streets, or the substantial expansion of existing Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 16 electrical, telephone, or other utility lines along these roadways should be accomplished underground or underwater, where practical. B) Existing utility lines are to be relocated underground wherever practical, as the City and/or State undertake street or highway projects or when a utility company replaces overhead utility lines. POLICY STATEMENT B.13 To insure compatibility of energy production activities and tourist -oriented development, the City will develop design compatibility guidelines and require new oil and gas producers to conform to these standards. Development plans for extraction or support facilities will undergo site plan review and inspection for compliance and appropriate screening will be required. POLICY STATEMENT B.14 The City, County and State will work together to promote public parking areas in proximity to public beaches. POLICY STATEMENT B.15 ISAC (Island Strategic Action Committee) will be notified of all zoning and re -zoning cases that come before the City regarding the Islands at the time of public notification. POLICY STATEMENT B.16 Vehicular access along the Gulf beach shall not be restricted unless necessary for public safety. POLICY STATEMENTS FOR THE PUBLICLY OWNED LAND IN THE CITY'S FIVE MILE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION LOCATED IN KLEBERG COUNTY SOUTH OF THE CITY LIMITS POLICY STATEMENT B.17 This area is publicly owned by Nueces County or is within the Padre Island National Seashore. Currently, the land is undeveloped with only a few oil and gas extraction activities on the property. Regarding development in this area, the following policies apply: A) This area must be preserved as an area of natural coastal habitat while providing for increased public access to the Gulf beaches and the Laguna Madre Shorelines. B) Any use or development of the land or a portion thereof must have a significant beneficial impact on the region or the State. C) Potential uses for this area include: Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 17 1) Beach and Laguna access roads at a spacing of approximately 2 miles apart (current spacing is 8 miles) are critically needed for emergency vehicle and enhanced public access. 2) Camping, fishing, hiking and general recreation. POLICY STATEMENTS FOR THE AREA FROM ZAHN ROAD TO THE SOUTH CITY LIMITS POLICY STATEMENT B.18 Commercial proposals providing substantial acreage and planned commercial clusters are encouraged in large developments of substantial acreage. POLICY STATEMENT B.19 Low and medium density mixed use tourist facilities will be encouraged. High density mixed use locations will be planned to accommodate ingress/egress in neighborhoods. POLICY STATEMENTS FOR THE AREA FROM ZAHN ROAD TO NORTH CITY LIMITS POLICY STATEMENT B.20 Buffer zones will be encouraged next to single and multi -family residential areas from Mustang Island State Park to the north city limits. POLICY STATEMENT B.21 North of the Mustang Island State Park on the Gulf side of SH361 high-density tourist oriented development will be encouraged. POLICY STATEMENT B.22 The area located on the west side of SH361 is planned for residential mixed uses and conservation/State Park. Large portions of this area are composed of low-lying wetlands. Due to the sensitive nature of these lands and because the area does not have direct access to the Gulf, a maximum overall residential density of 12 units per acre will be allowed. Cluster -type developments will be encouraged through the use of incentives and are preferred over traditional residential development patterns. Commercial uses at intersections with collectors along SH361 are appropriate. POLICY STATEMENT B.23 High quality planned commercial uses at the intersection of collector streets are encouraged. Strip commercial development will be prohibited along SH361, unless access management techniques are provided (marginal access, shared driveways, etc.). Access management will enhance public safety and the traffic capacity of SH361. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 18 POLICY STATEMENT B.24 City and county will pursue construction of a public -access boat ramp and associated amenities at Wilsons Cut. POLICY STATEMENTS FOR THE JOHN F. KENNEDY (JFK) CAUSEWAY AREA POLICY STATEMENT B.25 Regarding development in this area, the following policies apply: A) The bait and fishing stands located along the John F. Kennedy (JFK) Causeway are at the primary entrance to the Islands and are among the first sights visitors see of the Islands. The City will place a high priority on the visual enhancement of this area. B) Paved parking and structural improvements will be required. C) The City will encourage efforts to beautify, enhance, preserve and protect the area. D) The entrance to the Islands should be enhanced by using prominent signage or another type of structure. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 19 C. TRANSPORTATION POLICY STATEMENT C.1 The City Council adopts the Urban Transportation Plan, which is part of MobilityCC, the Mobility Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan to guide future transportation decisions. The transportation section of this Area Development Plan recommends amendments to the Corpus Christi Urban Transportation Plan recommendations are based on the "ultimate" street network necessary to serve a fully developed plan area. Unless otherwise specified or where not feasible, all streets are recommended to contain sidewalk, curb, gutter and underground drainage. This transportation section recommends amendments to the Urban Transportation Plan map and to the Bikeway Plan as follows: A) Sand Dollar is currently a paper street; the City should evaluate the need for Sand Dollar Street and potential impact the street could have on relieving traffic congestion. The proposed collector streets on the Islands are conceptually located and some alignments may change depending on efficient and functional alternatives presented by the property owner at the time of development. B) Integrate the bikeway system with the new bridge and water exchange being developed on Park Road 22 and SH 361 and Whitecap Boulevard. The vision for the bridge is to provide water access from the neighborhood in Padre Isles to Lake Padre, to create better water quality in the Padre Isles canal system and to connect the Padre Isles residential neighborhood with the Lake Padre area. C) The area immediately west of SH 361 and Beach Access Road 2 has been acquired by Mustang Island State Park, and therefore the proposed collector street located on the west side of SH 361 between Beach Access Road 2 and Seaway Drive extended should be removed from the Urban Transportation Plan. See Figure 9. POLICY STATEMENT C.2 The City will encourage implementation of the pedestrian and bicycle amenities as prescribed in the MPO's Strategic Plan for Active Mobility Phase I: Bicycle Mobility (completed 2016) and Phase II: Pedestrian Mobility (under development 2016) Figure K1. These plans are intended to foster cycling and walking as safe and viable transportation alternatives to enhance access to essential goods and services for all residents and visitors in our community. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 20 POLICY STATEMENT C.3 The City, in coordination with the Federal, State and County governments, will prioritize a long- term emergency action plan for maintaining sufficient emergency egress from the Islands, which will include a second crossing of the Laguna Madre. POLICY STATEMENT C.4 SH361 and SPID are the emergency access roads on and off the Islands. All future modifications to these roads and new collector streets and modifications to existing collector streets within 500feet of SPID shall be designed to assure that low elevations in these roadways do not critically limit evacuation of the Islands. The City will conduct a study to evaluate flooding on PR22. POLICY STATEMENT C.5 A high priority will be placed on transportation improvements, including the PR22 bridge, that will directly benefit the local tourist industry and are multi -modal, i.e. accommodate transit and active (non -vehicular) modes of mobility. Future canal systems should accommodate multi -modal means of transportation where possible with emphasis placed on multi -modal accessibility. POLICY STATEMENT C.6 Encourage a second crossing of the Laguna Madre, as included in Segment A of the seven segment Regional Parkway Mobility Corridor project, as described in a 2013 Feasibility Study and a 2016 Planning and Environmental Linkages study. Recognition of the potential need for an alternative crossing is documented in studies from the 1980s and 1990s, including the South Loop Transportation Study (1999). Segment A would be intended to: A) Provide secondary emergency evacuation route from Mustang and Padre Islands. B) Serve the growing residential population on the south side of Corpus Christi and facilitate regional mobility and connectivity. C) Alleviate mounting congestion and operational/safety issues on the SH358 corridor Exhibit A • Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 21 Delete Collector Street Segment — See Figure 9. Conduct a Traffic Study to determine if Sand Dollar Street is needed. (3131 a• • o;04. coo 22 4 a • ,5 Urban Transportation Legend Street Type & Required Right -of -Way Urban Streets Design Feature No. of Lanes Existing Proposed Cclecmrs 01 266 2 021551 Cunt LT 3 — — — C3175' 4 • • w Parieays'Gulf Beach Access P1130. Bikeway 2 0 0 Ce Gill Beach ■ ■ ■ PA%0' Beach Parting Arterials 511951 Cont. LT 5 521 IW' Medan 531130' Meehan B • • • Rural Streets Arterials RA11125' Cunt LIT 2 RA211Ti5' Median 5 RA3 r 200' d Freewayi Etpressways Fl tea Bartter 4-10 Proposed Interchanges Existing Full interchange WfRamps • Grade Separation W/0 Ramps • Paired Interchange Wfa Ramps Q Transit Stations or Park & Ride Lois AL INTERSTATE HWY 7 STATE HWY Runway 0 Railroad 11S HWY FN 615 2444 Note: Undesignated Collectors wio an alphalnumerio eferenne classifica5on are designated as C1 and have 2 lanes with do' right-of-way. Local street classification are not reflected on this map. Dashed Lines indicate where additional Right of Way is needed- Refer totext for details. Note: Wherea street is designated as a Bikeway on the Transportation Plan additional street widerrdrg maybe requited. Figure 7: Urban Transportation Plan (excerpt) V Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 22 I4 IifU3ERllRIME Iw SuaMyR� 4 13 taa� N� r�•1 0 IIVI STRAME 12 Kl 11.1AU.STIU CTURE .0013LPilli ME,/ YUMA AT) Figure 8: Bikeway Network (excerpt of City Network) Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 23 e 1r -f a art1 s/ 04,10 1 t, ar - irk ance s Collector Segment Deleted from the Urban Transportation plan Seaw.r Dnvr EA, to Bosch Access Road 2 Figure 9: Removal of Proposed Collector West of SH 361 POLICY STATEMENT C.7 For public safety and to protect roadway capacity on SPID and SH361, future development will require access management controls, i.e. shared driveways, interconnected parking, etc. Implementation of the recommendations derived from the 2016 Padre Island Access and Mobility Study should be prioritized. POLICY STATEMENT C.8 Encourage working with the appropriate agencies to develop a solution for traffic congestion at PR22 and SH361interection and access road. POLICY STATEMENT C.9 The City will continue to work with private landowners, TxDOT and the Texas General Land Office to identify potential beach accesses and get them constructed (i.e. Access 2A, 2B and 3A). The City will also continue to maintain these access roads for the benefit of the public. The access roads should be re -named to correspond with their adjacent mile marker. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 24 POLICY STATEMENT C.10 The City will pursue grants, capital improvement programming, hotel/motel tax revenue and other sources of funding for acquisition and improvement of public beach access. BEACH ACCESS PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of this section is to preserve and enhance the public's right to use and have access to and from the public beach and to support standards certifying construction on land adjacent to the Gulf of Mexico is consistent with such public rights. The geographic scope of the City's jurisdiction for beach access includes all areas within the City's corporate limits and its extraterritorial jurisdiction on the Islands located between the Gulf beach and the closest paralleling public roadway or 1,000 feet, whichever is greater. In addition, the City is authorized to regulate the platting of property and to annex properties within the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction. Two areas are exempted by the GLO rules from local beachfront construction certification requirements. These exempted areas are the Mustang Island State Park and the Padre Island National Seashore. The City is requesting County, State and Federal agencies controlling beachfront property provide enhanced access and parking facilities. In addition, certain uses and development such as oil and gas exploration and livestock grazing are exempted from the requirements of a dune protection permit, but not a Beachfront Construction Certificate (BCC). Shoreline areas experiencing erosion are of particular concern, as any structures located adjacent to these areas will be at the highest risk of damage in the shortest time period. Under rules established by the GLO, which are applicable to both beach access and dune protection review procedures, construction in the eroding areas must be responsive to the risk of erosion in the future. An erosion area boundary has been identified through utilizing erosion data provided by the Bureau of Economic Geology. This boundary projects potential erosion 50 years into the future. Additional construction standards will apply within this area. These standards are included within the Nueces County Corpus Christi Joint Erosion Response Plan and the Dune Protection and Beach Access Regulations. EXISTING BEACH ACCESS Approximately 24.7 miles of public gulf beach is within the city limits and extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City. Currently, seven vehicular roads provide public access to the 14.7 miles of public beach within the City of Corpus Christi's area of control with 3 additional beach access roads located within State and National parks. An additional 10 miles of beach are in either the exempted areas of the Mustang Island State Park or the Padre Island National Seashore. Beach Access Road #2 is located approximately one-half mile north of the northern boundary of Mustang Island State Park. This is the only beach access road between the State Park and Beach Access Road #1, located approximately 7.3 miles north of Beach Access Road #2 and 3.6 miles north of the Port Aransas city limits. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 25 All of the remaining ten beach access roads within the City of Corpus Christi's area of control are concentrated within a four -mile area between Beach Access Road #3 and Beach Access Road #6. This area includes the Seawall and Nueces County's Padre Balli Park and Packery Channel. The Mustang Island State Park entrance road provides the only vehicular access to the two-mile long public beach between Fish Pass and south to the vehicular barrier located 0.3 miles north of Beach Access Road #3. Beach Access Road #3 is located within Mustang Island State Park and approximately 3/4 mile north of the State Park's southern boundary. It provides access to the beach between the State Park's vehicular barrier on the north side of Corpus Christi Pass and Zahn Road. Beach Access Road "North", as it is commonly referenced, is located approximately one mile south of the northern boundary of the Padre Island National Seashore. This road provides the only beach access road between Beach Access Road #6 and the vehicular barrier just south of Access Road "North" at the north end of the National Seashore, a distance of approximately eight miles. A barricaded parking and day -use area exists on a portion of the public beach between Padre Balli Park entrance road and Bob Hall Pier. Vehicular traffic is routed immediately landward of both of these areas. Currently, most of the public beach within the City's jurisdiction is fully accessible to vehicular traffic and public parking on the beach. The only restriction on vehicular traffic and public on - beach parking exist along the Seawall. Public parking and vehicular traffic in front of the seawall shall comply with the current City Ordinance. POLICY STATEMENT C.11 The City shall consider renaming existing and future beach access roads to correspond with their beach mile markers for safety and emergency purposes. POLICY STATEMENT C.12 The City will continue to protect the public's right of access to Gulf Beaches through the BCC process. The purpose of the BCC is to protect public access to gulf beaches as development occurs adjacent to the Gulf Beach. POLICY STATEMENT C.13 Numerous natural and man-made processes have caused significant changes of the public beaches along the Gulf Coast, including Mustang and Padre Islands. If these processes continue, as they are projected to, the public beach may become so narrow that continued vehicular use of the beach might be physically impossible or pose a threat to public safety. Future opportunities for providing public access to the public beach may be seriously diminished as development of private property landward of the public beach occurs. Also, the increased use of public beaches will create conflicts with vehicular and pedestrian movement. The City will strongly encourage the following policies and objectives: A) The purchase of pedestrian beach access points and associated parking. The primary funding mechanism for these acquisitions will be State and Federal grants, capital improvement programming and hotel/motel tax revenue. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 26 B) Regulate pedestrian and vehicular beach access, traffic and parking on the beach only in a manner that preserves or enhances existing public right to use. C) Except for in front of the seawall, the City will not pursue closure of any portion of the public beach to vehicular traffic except for emergency purposes or by voter approval. POLICY STATEMENT C.14 The City, County and State will work together to promote public parking areas in proximity to public beaches. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 27 D. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Corpus Christi is the gateway to more useable ocean beach than any other community in the nation. Twenty-one miles of Gulf beaches lie within Corpus Christi City limits or ETJ and another sixty- two miles are only accessible through Corpus Christi. The Islands are home to three major Beach Parks: the seventy -mile long Padre Island National Seashore, the 4,200 -acre Mustang Island State Park and the Nueces County Coastal Parks with 4,500 acres of Mustang and Padre Island. Corpus Christi Bay and the Upper Laguna Madre system are the western boundary of the Islands providing access for fishing, birding, water sports and other outdoor activities. From the City's economic development perspective, public investment in infrastructure for new development on the islands will have one of the biggest returns on investments in this nationally unique area. The point to be made on these figures is that almost any investment by the City to make the Islands more attractive, better able to accommodate new growth, etc. will reap large returns in increased property values. The Islands are one of only a few coastal areas near a metropolitan area that have ample undeveloped property. If growth and development of the Islands occurs similar to other areas on the east and west coasts then Corpus Christi can see an increase in Island property by multiples. In 2016, the Islands represented approximately 15% of Corpus Christi's total taxable valuation. Island Goals THE CITY AND THE ISLANDS WILL WORK TO PROVIDE: A) Well maintained, safe, attractive beaches. B) Mixed destination use, including retail, entertainment, restaurants, meeting facilities, water and boating access that are accessible by pedestrians, bicyclist, golf carts, shuttles and motor vehicles. C) Improved access to the Laguna Madre and Corpus Christi Bay. D) A developed and unique identity for the Islands including branding, clearly identified gateways and landscaping; E) Sufficient funding to promote tourism to the Islands, including a coordinated effort to promote the Islands. F) Festival facilities. G) A grocery store to service the growing residential population. H) RV Parks in appropriate locations. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 28 I) Plan for large scale developments on existing large undeveloped tracts, i.e. Lake Padre Area and the Jones Tract located south of Padre Isles. Residential A) Safe, attractive orderly neighborhoods. B) Well maintained neighborhood parks, an athletic center to include tennis, dog park(s), swimming pools, etc. C) Improved bicycle and pedestrian access to and within existing residential neighborhoods in strategic locations. D) Promote the Islands as a retirement destination. E) Promote home ownership benefits in Texas. POLICY STATEMENT D.1 The City will analyze and pursue alternative means of creating special funds for capital improvements, public facilities and beach operations/maintenance. These funding mechanisms include bond program funding, hotel/motel tax, beach parking fees, grants, tax increment financing, and other local, State or Federal programs. PACKERY CHANNEL Packery Channel (Figure 10) was constructed as a joint project between the Federal Government (US Army Corps of Engineers), the State (the Texas General Land Office) and the City of Corpus Christi. The local share of this project is financed by the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 2 (TIRZ #2), also known as the Padre Island Tax Increment Financing District (PITIF) (Figure 11). The TIRZ #2 is a means of allocating a portion of the property tax revenue collected from the zone to pay for public improvements in the zone. The TIRZ does not create a new tax or additional tax burden but is intended to encourage private investments and increase the value or properties in the zone. The Packery Channel Project has several purposes: A) Providing a convenient recreational water passage from North Padre Island to the Gulf of Mexico. B) Providing a valuable source of sand for beach re -nourishment. C) Providing funding for ongoing maintenance of the channel. D) Providing an additional attraction for economic development of the Islands. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 29 Figure 10: Packery Channel Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 30 Padre Island Tax Increment Financfng District (TI! „!'" c+r� la 101.1 Li ips LEGEND TIF•ber COrpu o y Lot Lae C *Id Stlid Coin add sot Figure 11: Padre Island Tax Increment Financing District Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 31 POLICY STATEMENT D.2 Capital improvement projects located in or serving areas in the TIRZ #2 are of the highest priority. Extension of TIRZ #2 is vital for continuing maintenance of the Packery Chanel project, providing funds for rehabilitation projects as a result of natural disasters and continued improvement of the Islands. Capital improvements that support development of the TIRZ #2 will generate tax increment dollars that must be spent on public improvements in the district. POLICY STATEMENT D.3 The City will vigorously support and encourage the continued development and improvement of Packery Channel for the purpose of providing a recreational boat pass, enhanced water exchange to the Laguna Madre and a destination attraction on the gulf coast POLICY STATEMENT D.4 Promote tourist oriented development east of State Highway 361/Park Road 22 and between Zahn Road and Whitecap Boulevard by providing public and private amenities to make the area more attractive and "people friendly". These amenities should support a multimodal transportation system (pedestrian, bicycle, vehicular and water transit), and uniquely attractive developments, both public and private, with facilities using the highest quality design and materials. POLICY STATEMENT D.5 Private land located south of the Packery Channel and landward of the seawall should be developed with a mix of high-density tourist oriented commercial and residential activities. Development standards for this area will be of a very high order requiring abundant landscaping, a consistent urban design theme and public improvements that exceed standard requirements. A development concept provided by a major land owner of vacant lands in the area is shown on Figure 12. POLICY STATEMENT D.6 A navigable connection between Lake Padre and Padre Isles with a PR22 bridge is considered a priority for development and water exchange. POLICY STATEMENT D.7 Encourage development of a full service marina in Lake Padre opening up Padre Island to recreational sailing and power vessels with unfettered access to the Gulf. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 32 Figure 12: Packery Channel Enhancements Exhibit A THE PACKERY CHANNEL PROJECT Park 1 Utility Related Improvements Location & Description tor EIS North Side Channel North Side Park Wetlands Area Packery North Sil Point Park �•• ,_-., k Beach Park , to r -�(1 .., VI' iiii 0 , ~"--~ _ ,, . i 1''' i SHINER MOSELEY AND ASSOCIATES, INC. `__ ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS 655 N. C87Pnwhea Street, Suitt 1.850.Cerpus Chsti. Tcxa.+!8478 at ct co it C-.- 1Jr--- , rC) R17-1�,... Y - E s C 8 C § m y. _-, e 5• ! o 2 i $ i gf § 14 5 9. L P U it W "i2 `_ n C Y1 _e a. a q S 1 1y: :1 iA-112 {LC u ill d I1 k C ^�' 6fl C a a l''' g n" ILIO. �' ~e 7:6 ,� .� ♦ y E 1Ytt if E 1 1 fit _$ 45 t 4 al ° A . 8! I'xIlli" ug 111;121 t' -EI -1 FlR gEI-1°l`u1Zg aNas v1 .¢-!: fi `l 1411x1 _. ° v m I ° n 21111,'E 7. n p a 8 3 iilil €akk �¢ Sl 4 f•�wj�a70:at2'E ;¢-51 all C Y s i 4 4 z 61 S Z d Figure 12: Packery Channel Enhancements Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 33 E. PUBLIC SERVICES PARKS & RECREATION POLICY STATEMENT E.1 Gulf of Mexico beaches are the region's number one tourist attraction and will be maintained in a manner that promotes the public's access and use in a sustainable manner to the sensitive beach/dune ecosystem. Beach operations headquarters and equipment storage facilities are needed in close proximity to the beach. The City will investigate additional funding mechanisms for these facilities to ensure sufficient personnel and equipment are available for this important program. Possible additional or expanded funding operations may include: A) Increases in the current fee and permit system. B) Federal and State grants. C) Local and State dedicated Hotel/Motel Taxes. D) Special districts. In addition, the City will continually seek to use "adaptive management practices" for beach maintenance through continuous dialog with the GLO and Nueces Protection Advisory Committee County. POLICY STATEMENT E.2 The City will pursue alternative avenues for park land development, in conjunction with the Nueces County Coastal Parks and Mustang Island State Park. POLICY STATEMENT E.3 The City will develop a Specific Beach Utilization Master Plan for all gulf beaches and Packery Channel and should include shoreline areas adjacent to the Laguna Madre/Corpus Christi Bay. Development of the plan will include a public participation process designed to obtain input from island property owners and residents, including the several existing Islands advocacy groups, as well as citywide input from citizens. The plan should include recreational improvements to be placed on either side of Packery Channel, the need for ADA accessibility on all improvements, compliance with FEMA flood elevation requirements and the City and County's beach management plans. POLICY STATEMENT E.4 The City will encourage festival sites on the island for large special events. Facility improvements are intended to make the Corpus Christi gulf coast the premier location for hosting special beach events on the Texas gulf coast. Festival site facilities and locations may be developed as joint ventures with the County, State or with private property owners. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 34 POLICY STATEMENT E.5 The City will pursue additional public boat ramps and parking for access to the Laguna Madre and Corpus Christi Bay. Joint public agreements between the County, the State or other entities could facilitate this objective and reduce overall costs. Potential sites for consideration should include: existing park locations; Wilson's Cut on Mustang Island and Kleberg County, Laguna Madre shoreline or other viable alternatives. POLICY STATEMENT E.6 A high recreational improvement priority of the City is to fully develop existing parks on the island. These parks include Jackfish, Aquarius, Commodores, Billish and Douden Parks. The improved parks will be regularly maintained according to the City's Parks Master Plan. POLICY STATEMENT E.7 The City will pursue development of a multi-purpose meeting facility as a place for resident public functions, senior citizen activities and other public/recreational functions. If land on existing city parks is not suitable, the City should consider a joint agreement with the County on County park land in the area. POLICY STATEMENT E.8 The city will pursue development of dedicated park lands on Mustang Island. PUBLIC SAFETY POLICY STATEMENT E.9 The City will provide public safety personnel and facilities to serve the Islands. STREETS POLICY STATEMENT E.10 Establish a short, medium and long term schedule for street resurfacing of all existing streets on the island. Collector and arterial streets and beach access roads will have priority for street resurfacing. STORMWATER SYSTEM POLICY STATEMENT E.11 Development of a Stormwater Master Plan for Mustang Island is a high priority for supporting new development. A key element of any new development is the manner in which the property will efficiently and effectively drain, tie into an overall storm drainage system, and, most importantly, not drain or damage downstream properties. Currently, there is not a Stormwater Master Plan for Mustang Island. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 35 WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS POLICY STATEMENT E.12 The City will continue to place a high priority on providing an adequate supply of water to the Islands to support rapid growth. The City will continue to explore conventional and innovative methods of supply including: extension of additional water transmission lines, aquifer storage and recovery and desalinization, etc. POLICY STATEMENT E.13 The City will support and facilitate the creation of a public improvement district to provide unpaved streets, water and wastewater and other public infrastructure improvements in portions of the area not adequately supported by existing public infrastructure. For example, many of the vacant lots (known as "A" and "B" Lots) along SPID and Palmira Streets do not have both water and wastewater lines. The City would finance such improvements and assess the costs in an equitable manner among district property owners in accordance with Chapter 372 of the Texas Local Government Code. POLICY STATEMENT E.14 The City will continue to reuse effluent from the Whitecap Wastewater Treatment Plant to benefit the islands as a source of water for landscaping on the Islands POLICY STATEMENT E.15 The City will continue to work closely with Nueces County Water Improvement District No. 4 in the future to identify issues and ensure adequate provision of water and wastewater services to the District's service area. The area south of Mustang Island State Park receives all services from the City of Corpus Christi. District No. 4 provides water and wastewater services to the State Park and areas north of the State Park, with the City providing all other services. This arrangement will continue for the foreseeable future. This will include: A) Creation of joint/compatible development standards between the City and District No. 4. B) Provision of adequate and reliable water and wastewater services to all area property owners. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 36 F. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS The purpose of this chapter is to outline the capital improvement needs as identified in the Mustang/Padre Area Development Plan. The project list below should be used to provide input to the City's Annual Capital Budget and Long Range Capital Improvement Program. POLICY STATEMENT F.1 Establish continuous funding sources and foster multiple partnerships for ongoing capital improvements on the islands. In addition to equitable distribution of future bond programs, funding mechanisms include tax increment financing, public improvement district, tax abatement/credits, State hotel/motel taxes or similar mechanisms. Multiple partnerships should include, but are not limited to, the RTA, Nueces County, MPO, and impacted private organizations. Care must be taken to insure that funding is reserved only for those projects that create a measurable increase in quality of life and tourism. Following the adoption of this Plan, City Staff will incorporate the Plan's capital improvements into the overall citywide Capital Improvement Program in keeping with the overall prioritization and funding available at the time. PARK AND RECREATION POLICY STATEMENT F.2 Create a Specific Beach Utilization Master Plan for all Gulf Beaches, Packery Channel and shoreline areas adjacent to the Laguna Madre/Corpus Christi Bay. Elements to be included in the plan will include: A) Facilities such as showers, pavilions and restrooms, etc. B) Access facilities — beach access roads, day use areas, public parking and dune walkovers etc. C) Boat ramps and/or portage areas. D) Pedestrian access for viewing natural habitat areas. E) Shade structures and pavilions. F) Beach maintenance and operations facilities. G) Signage. H) Festival facilities. I) Other associated recreational facilities. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 37 POLICY STATEMENT F.3 Public boat ramps on Mustang Island and Kleberg County or other viable alternatives to facilitate public access. POLICY STATEMENT F.4 Park Improvements. Billish Park is currently being upgraded. All other parks need to be upgraded as well. PUBLIC SAFETY STREETS POLICY STATEMENT F.5 Facilitate pedestrian and bicycle access along Park Road 22 with the highest priority for the intersections of Commodores Drive and Whitecap Boulevard. The purpose is to make these intersections and roadways safer for alternative modes of transportation. Such improvements may include: A) Joint sidewalks, bicycle and golf cart lanes. B) Signage; C) Enhanced and or more frequent street maintenance. POLICY STATEMENT F.6 Landscaping and pedestrian/bicycle improvements and facilities should be constructed in the public rights-of-way on major streets, or other streets in accordance with any adopted mobility plans. POLICY STATEMENT F.7 The JFK Causeway was elevated for safety. Park Road 22 should also be elevated for safety, particularly as an egress, as well as improvement to drainage, primarily on the west bound lane. The City and TXDOT should work together to establish and implement a solution. POLICY STATEMENT F.8 Improve Sand Dollar (portions that have not been developed), Tortugas, Palmira and other dedicated but unimproved streets. POLICY STATEMENT F.9 Provide sidewalks to connect the seawall with Whitecap Boulevard and construct new sidewalks on designated Urban Transportation Plan streets where there are no sidewalks. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 38 STORMWATER POLICY STATEMENT F.10 Development of a Stormwater Master Plan for the Islands. Include in the plan an assessment of Park Road 22 to determine if underground drainage could be a means to assure better drainage and to provide a narrower curb and gutter street section on Park Road 22. Currently, there is at least 200 feet of right-of-way on Park Road 22 to accommodate roadside ditches. A curb and gutter section, could be constructed in only 100 feet of right-of-way. A narrower street section could allow the construction of marginal access roadways (similar to frontage roads) to serve businesses and residential uses along Park Road 22. WATER AND WASTEWATER POLICY STATEMENT F.11 Establish a public improvement district to finance construction of wastewater service lines to platted properties along Park Road 22. A Public Improvement District would establish a cost sharing mechanism between the City and property owners. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 39 G. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION During the formation of this Plan, staff found that there are many very active and energetic organizations that exist on the island. Many of these organizations have diverse interests in the island but the common thread between all of the organizations is that they are all very interested in the island's future development. Some of these groups include the Padre Island Property Owners Association, the Padre Island Business Association, the Sea Wall Owners, many condominium associations, Schlitterbahn, and others. POLICY STATEMENT G.1 This Plan constitutes the primary guide for the development and redevelopment of the Mustang/Padre Island Area. The Plan provides the overall basis for which the City makes determinations concerning zoning, capital improvement projects and improvements, infrastructure improvements, and to a somewhat lesser degree building code issues. POLICY STATEMENT G.2 The Mustang/Padre Island Strategic Action Committee has been established to implement this Plan. The primary charge of this Committee is to aggressively pursue the implementation of this Plan. The committee shall develop specific strategies for implementation of the Plan with specific timelines to implement the respective strategies and a clear determination of which agency or individual is responsible to implement specific projects or programs. The highest priority projects for the Strategic Action Committee include: A) Mustang/Padre Island Area Development Plan projects to be recommended for inclusion in the next City Bond Program. B) Implementation of sustainable new or additional funding sources for the Mustang- Padre Island Area, i.e., Tax Increment Financing District, Municipal Management District, Public Improvement District, or other mechanisms to fund projects. Identified funding sources should be in place within 12 months of adoption of the Mustang/Padre Island Area Plan. C) Annual input into the City's Capital Improvement Program. D) State legislation pertaining to Island concerns. E) Other appropriate areas of concern. Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Island Development Plan Adopted Month and Day, 2017 Page 40 Appendix 1: Island Overlay Exhibit A Mustang/Padre Area Development Plan City Council Presentation January 24, 2017 Mustang/Padre Area Development Plan Planning Area Boundaries Padre Island National Sea Shore Plan Area Boundary (69,386 Acres) Corpus Christi/Port Aransas City Limits Planning Process • The Island Strategic Action Committee (ISAC) was formed based on the 2004 Mustang/Padre Area Development Plan. ■ This year the ISAC adopted a goal to update the 12 year old Mustang/Padre Island Area Development Plan ■ Funding for a new plan was not available ■ ISAC decided to form a subcommittee to update the plan ■ July 30, 2016, ISAC open house for comments on draft plan ■ September 13, 2016, ISAC recommended the revised plan be adopted ■ ISAC informed City Council that a draft plan had been completed • Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on December 14, 2016 and recommended the plan for adoption by City Council Plan Summary • Socio-economic statistics reveal the Island as one of the fastest growing areas of the City with higher median home values, educational attainment and incomes. • Over the last 12 years existing residential uses have increased by 300 acres and commercial uses by over 200 acres. • Environmental Policies • Protection and enhancement of gulf beaches • Encourage development using best practices and innovative designs • Solid waste disposal uses shall not be allowed on the islands • Protect sensitive wildlife habitats • Land Use • Tourist -oriented business uses are to be encouraged • The highest quality of design shall be encouraged to create a unique sense of place • Vehicular access along gulf beaches shall not be restricted unless necessary for public safety Plan Summary (cont'd) • Transportation Improve public beach access • Integrate the bikeway system with the new bridge and water exchange on Park Road 22 Encourage pedestrian and bicycle amenities for all residents and visitors Support a second crossing of the Laguna Madre • Economic Development • Continue to pursue improvements for the Packery Channel • Capital improvements for Reinvestment Zone #2 are of the highest priority • Encourage development of a full service marina in Lake Padre • Public Services and Capital Improvements • Create a Specific Beach Master Plan • Improve City Parks • Plan Implementation • City Planning staff will implement the plan with ISAC, Planning Commission, and other community input. Future Land Use 1 01 41 II 1.1 Mixed Use Low Density Residential Flood Plain Conservation Planned Development Medium Density Residential Water ME Commercial ME High Density Residential n Planning District 1. Government Transportation Institutional I Permanent Open Space Discussion AGENDA MEMORANDUM Action Item for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 DATE: January 24, 2017 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Rebecca Huerta, City Secretary rebeccah@cctexas.com (361) 826-3105 Changing the Start Time of City Council Meetings CAPTION: Discussion and consideration of changing the start time of the regular City Council Meetings. PURPOSE: Mayor Pro Tem Carolyn Vaughn is requesting to change the start time of regular City Council meetings. City Council policies require Council approval of any changes to the regular meeting time. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Section 16.a.1. of the Council Policies states that the City Council shall meet in regular session at 2:00 p.m. each Tuesday, except for the first Tuesday each month. The time for a regular meeting may be changed, however, as deemed advisable by the Council. On December 20, 2016, at the request of Mayor Dan McQueen, the City Council passed Motion No. 2016-160, which changed the City Council meeting start time to 2:00 p.m. Previous to that, City Council meetings began at 11:30 a.m., having been changed from a begin time of Noon, by Motion No. 2012-200, passed by City Council on December 11, 2012. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Conforms with City Council policies. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: None. FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital Q Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $0 $0 $0 Encumbered / Expended Amount $0 $0 $0 This item $0 $0 $0 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 Fund(s): N/A LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None. AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of January 17, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 DATE: TO: January 10, 2017 Margie C. Rose, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager markvv@cctexas.com (361) 826-3897 Valerie H. Gray, P. E., Executive Director of Public Works valerieg@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: Andres Leal, Jr., P. E., Interim Director of Street Operations andyl@cctexas.com (361) 826-1957 J. H. Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Resolution Approving Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) FY 2017 Annual Work Plan CAPTION: Resolution approving the concepts, direction, and general work plan for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP). PURPOSE: The purpose of this agenda item is for City Council to approve a Resolution in support of the SPMP FY 2017 Annual Work Plan. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The selection criteria for streets included in the SPMP FY 2017 Annual Work Plan was developed based on the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) scores for streets. Work was distributed among Council Districts in an equitable method based on maintenance needs to extend street life, improve performance and delay street reconstruction. Next, the work plan considered allocating available resources among residential, collector and arterial streets based on the most urgent need. Residential streets were then evaluated by neighborhood and work was further distributed based on the need for either overlay or seal coat treatment. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the Resolution as proposed. 2. Approve the Resolution with modifications. 3. Do not approve the Resolution. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Resolution complies with City Charter's requirements for approval of resolutions. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Street Operations Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑Capital X Not applicable Fiscal Years 2016 - 2017 Development Construction Option Year One TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered/Expended Amount Future Anticipated Expenditures BALANCE Fund(s): Street Fund Comments: None. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the Resolution as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Council District List — FY 2017 Work Plan Alphabetical Street Listing — FY 2017 Work Plan City Seal Coat Work Plan FY 2017 Location Map Presentation Resolution approving the concepts, direction, and general work plan for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP). WHEREAS, on June 25, 2013, by Ordinance No. 029876 and Ordinance No. 029877,the City Council (a) established a Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) and Street Maintenance Fee (SMF); and (b) established policies, rates, and methodologies for the SPMP and SMF, respectively, and amended and codified the two ordinances under Sections 10 through 20 of Ordinance No. 029917; WHEREAS, under the "Definitions" section of the above Ordinances (a) Director means the City Manager or designee; (b) Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) means the street preventative maintenance program, as amended from time to time, funded by the Street Maintenance Fee; and (c) Street System means the structures, streets, rights-of-way, bridges, alleys, and other facilities within city limits that are dedicated to the use of vehicular traffic; the maintenance and repair of those facilities; and the operation and administration of such maintenance and repair under the Street Preventative Maintenance Program; WHEREAS, Section 11 of Ordinance No. 029877, titled "Rules," provides that the Director is responsible for administration of the SPMP and SMF, developing all rules and procedures necessary to administer the SPMP and SMF, developing all maintenance programs, and establishing Street System criteria and standards for the operation and maintenance of the Street System; WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 11, staff developed certain concepts, direction, selection criteria, and a general work plan for the initial year of the SPMP (the 2014 SPMP Work Plan (Year -1), which was approved for implementation on December 17, 2013, by Resolution No. 030046; WHEREAS, staff now presents for approval the Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) "the FY 2017 SPMP Work Plan "; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The City Council approves of, supports, and directs staff to proceed with implementing the concepts, direction, selection criteria, and general work plan for the FY 2017 Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) referred to as "the FY 2017 SPMP Work Plan." The 2017 SPMP Work Plan is attached as Exhibit A hereto. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Dan McQueen Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas of , 2017 The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Dan McQueen Rudy Garza Paulette Guajardo Michael Hunter Joe McComb Ben Molina Lucy Rubio Greg Smith Carolyn Vaughn IWILMA 1 4 1 A-1 1 165 1 56 1 1,027 1 63 1 EXHIBIT A STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR OVERLAY BY DISTRICT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) 1 YDZ PCI District 1 STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY 70100 BARTLETT WILSON KREJCI LN 1 Local 230 24 613 56 70200 BARTLETT SAXET N WILSON 1 Local 300 27 900 56 70300 BARTLETT SAXET N SAXET S 1 Local 975 24 2,600 56 74000 BEACH DEAD END E GULF BREEZE 1 C-1 300 24 800 66 74100 BEACH GULF BREEZE SURFSIDE 1 C-1 340 24 907 66 74200 BEACH SURFSIDE TIMON BLVD 1 C-1 165 24 440 66 74300 BEACH TIMON BLVD SEAGULL 1 C-1 225 37 925 66 98700 BLUE GRASS HORSE SHOES FRONTIER 1 Local 845 24 2,253 56 98800 BLUE GRASS FRONTIER OUTPOST DR 1 Local 1,055 24 2,813 56 108300 BOULDER CIR. TIMBERLINE DR DEAD END S. 1 Local 210 24 560 57 213200 CLEAR FORK DR PRAIRIE CREEK RED RIVER DR 1 Local 980 24 2,613 60 286000 DOGWOOD STARLITE ROCKWOOD 1 Local 1,430 24 3,813 60 317200 ELMORE BROOKS MC LEOD 1 Local 320 24 853 67 317300 ELMORE MC LEOD HIGHWAY 9 1 Local 500 24 1,333 67 322300 ERWIN AVE MUELLER COLIMA 1 Local 620 30 2,067 64 322400 ERWIN AVE COLIMA INTERSTATE 37 1 Local 180 30 600 64 370100 GLENWOOD STARLITE ROCKWOOD 1 Local 940 24 2,507 59 485600 KINGWOOD STARLITE WESTWOOD 1 Local 1,775 24 4,733 56 675500 OAK PARK AVE UP RIVER RD OAK PARK AVE 1 Local 415 40 1,844 69 675504 OAK PARK AVE OAK PARK AVE MUELLER 1 Local 760 40 3,378 69 675506 OAK PARK AVE UP RIVER RD OAK PARK AVE 1 Local 390 40 1,733 69 675600 OAK PARK AVE MUELLER COLIMA 1 Local 585 40 2,600 69 750300 PRAIRIE CRK DR CLEAR FORK DR MEDINA SPRINGS 1 Local 620 24 1,653 61 750400 PRAIRIE CRK DR MEDINA SPRINGS RED RIVER DR 1 Local 405 24 1,080 61 817100 SAGEBRUSH OUTPOST ROCKWOOD 1 Local 1,010 24 2,693 66 875000 SILVERSPUR HORSE SHOE FRONTIER 1 Local 990 24 2,640 63 1046800 WIND ROCK HORSE SHOE FRONTIER 1 Local 1,060 24 2,827 69 STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) 1 YD2 PCI District 2 STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY 30600 ALICE MC ARDLE LAMONT 2 Local 1,150 24 3,067 59 59100 AYERS ST GOLLIHAR VIOLA 2 A-1 420 23 1,073 62 59200 AYERS ST VIOLA SUNNYBROOK 2 A-1 910 23 2,326 62 109300 BRADFORD WEBER RD WEIR 2 Local 660 24 1,760 61 177800 CASA BONITA ORLANDO TEXAN TRAIL 2 Local 600 24 1,600 56 177900 CASA BONITA TEXAN TRAIL CASA LINDA 2 Local 730 24 1,947 56 505500 LAMONT WEIR WEBER RD 2 Local 660 24 1,760 61 614900 MORAVIAN LAMONT MC ARDLE 2 Local 1,150 24 3,067 56 682600 ODEM NICHOLSON GOLLIHAR 2 Local 1,280 24 3,413 60 759000 PYLE DR WEBER WEIR 2 Local 630 24 1,680 67 894200 SPRING ST CUIPER ALEXANDER 2 Local 640 24 1,707 62 894300 SPRING ST ALEXANDER RAMSEY 2 Local 545 24 1,453 62 894400 SPRING ST RAMSEY GOLLIHAR 2 Local 290 24 773 62 STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) 1 YD2 PCI District 3 STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY 59100 AYERS ST GOLLIHAR VIOLA 3 A-1 420 23 1,073 62 59200 AYERS ST VIOLA SUNNYBROOK 3 A-1 910 23 2,326 62 59300 AYERS ST SUNNYBROOK MANSHEIM 3 A-1 665 46 3,399 69 59400 AYERS ST MANSHEIM MC ARDLE 3 A-1 655 54 3,930 69 59500 AYERS ST MC ARDLE NEMEC ST 3 A-1 860 80 7,644 69 59600 AYERS ST NEMEC ST SPID (PADRE ISLAND D 3 A-1 370 80 3,289 69 512700 LARKSPUR TROJAN DR MANSHEIM 3 Local 665 24 1,773 61 512800 LARKSPUR MANSHEIM GARDEN DR 3 Local 665 24 1,773 61 512900 LARKSPUR GARDEN DR GOLLIHAR 3 Local 1,285 24 3,427 61 690500 ORCHID TROJAN DR MANSHEIM 3 Local 665 24 1,773 56 690600 ORCHID MANSHEIM GARDEN 3 Local 660 24 1,760 56 690700 ORCHID GARDEN GOLLIHAR 3 Local 1,280 24 3,413 56 STR ID 1 STREET 1 FROM 1 TO IDistrictIClassl LENGTH (FT) 1 WIDTH (FT) 1 YD2 1 PCI District 4 STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY 15600 (AIRLINE IWILMA EXHIBIT A STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR OVERLAY BY DISTRICT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) 1 YD2 PCI District 4 STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY - continued 15604 AIRLINE WILMA JARVIS 4 A-1 160 56 996 63 15700 AIRLINE JARVIS JARVIS 4 A-1 130 56 809 63 15704 AIRLINE JARVIS GAINES 4 A-1 135 56 840 63 15800 AIRLINE GAINES CAMDEN PL 4 A-1 460 48 2,453 63 15900 AIRLINE CAMDEN PL CAMDEN PL 4 A-1 655 48 3,493 63 16000 AIRLINE CAMDEN PL OCEAN DR 4 A-1 530 48 2,827 63 43000 ARANSAS ST ROSSITER SANTA BARBARA 4 Local 310 28 964 66 43100 ARANSAS ST SANTA BARBARA CALIFORNIA 4 Local 300 28 933 66 43200 ARANSAS ST CALIFORNIA SINCLAIR 4 Local 310 28 964 66 43300 ARANSAS ST SINCLAIR CORDULA 4 Local 455 28 1,416 66 43400 ARANSAS ST CORDULA ROPES 4 Local 455 28 1,416 66 43500 ARANSAS ST ROPES DEAD END E 4 Local 840 27 2,520 66 44600 ARCTIC CIR. QUEBEC DR. DEAD END 4 Local 190 24 507 58 80000 BELMA AMBER WALDRON RD 4 Local 815 18 1,630 57 189800 CENTER DR SHOPPING CENTER DELAINE 4 Local 140 24 373 62 189900 CENTER DR DELAINE JACKSON PLACE 4 Local 240 24 640 62 190000 CENTER DR JACKSON PLACE GRANT 4 Local 280 24 747 62 190100 CENTER DR GRANT CATALINA 4 Local 310 24 827 62 190200 CENTER DR CATALINA PEERMAN 4 Local 310 24 827 62 190300 CENTER DR PEERMAN PASADENA 4 Local 300 24 800 62 190400 CENTER DR PASADENA SANTA MONICA 4 Local 300 24 800 62 190500 CENTER DR SANTA MONICA BERMUDA 4 Local 300 24 800 62 190600 CENTER DR BERMUDA WILLIAMSON 4 Local 305 24 813 62 190700 CENTER DR WILLIAMSON DOLPHIN 4 Local 290 24 773 62 190800 CENTER DR DOLPHIN DOLPHIN 4 Local 90 24 240 62 190802 CENTER DR DOLPHIN BARRACUDA 4 Local 210 24 560 62 190900 CENTER DR BARRACUDA BARRACUDA 4 Local 135 24 360 62 190902 CENTER DR BARRACUDA CORAL 4 Local 155 24 413 62 191000 CENTER DR CORAL MIRAMAR 4 Local 295 24 787 62 191100 CENTER DR MIRAMAR PL CARMEL PARKWAY 4 Local 290 24 773 62 998700 VICTORIA PARK WOOLDRIDGE QUEBEC 4 C-1 1,460 24 3,893 69 1009900 WALDRON RD CARIBBEAN BAYBERRY N 4 A-1 845 24 2,253 57 1010000 WALDRON RD BAYBERRY N BAYBERRY S 4 A-1 320 24 853 57 1010100 WALDRON RD BAYBERRY S MEDITERRANEAN 4 A-1 585 24 1,560 57 1010102 WALDRON RD MEDITERRANEAN YORKTOWN 4 A-1 3,550 24 9,467 57 STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) 1 YD2 PCI District 5 STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY 12300 AIRLINE SARATOGA BLVD SANDRA LN 5 A-1 760 58 4,898 70 12400 AIRLINE SANDRA LN FITZHUGH DR 5 A-1 905 58 5,832 70 12500 AIRLINE FITZHUGH DR KRISTIN DR 5 A-1 240 58 1,547 70 12600 AIRLINE KRISTIN DR HOLLISTER DR 5 A-1 610 58 3,931 70 12700 AIRLINE HOLLISTER DR WOOLDRIDGE RD 5 A-1 430 68 3,249 70 247200 CRENSHAW WOOD IRON AARON 5 Local 1,490 24 3,973 68 299600 EAGLE DR WOOD -IRON AARON DR 5 Local 1,350 24 3,600 65 420700 HEBERT SANDERS ACUSHNET 5 Local 1,400 24 3,733 59 695600 OSO PARKWAY BEAUVAIS VALTOURMANCHE 5 P-1 600 32 2,133 60 695700 OSO PARKWAY VALTOURMANCHE PIEDRABUENA 5 P-1 410 32 1,458 60 695800 OSO PARKWAY PIEDRABUENA VALDEMORILLO 5 P-1 385 32 1,369 60 695900 OSO PARKWAY VALDEMORILLO CAMPODOLCINO 5 P-1 400 32 1,422 60 696000 OSO PARKWAY CAMPODOLCINO BAR -LE -DOC 5 P-1 1,000 32 3,556 60 696500 OSO PARKWAY MARSEILLE (E) ETIENNE 5 P-1 505 36 2,020 60 696600 OSO PARKWAY ETIENNE LENS DR 5 P-1 170 36 680 60 695500 OSO PKWY (N) STAPLES ST BEAUVAIS 5 P-1 345 32 1,227 60 695510 OSO PKWY (S) STAPLES BEAUVAIS 5 P-1 345 32 1,227 60 DISTRICT 1 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 146900 CABRA LAKE LAKE 1 Local 85 24 227 59 146904 CABRA LAKE CHIPITO 1 Local 280 24 747 59 238200 CORNELIA CIRE WESTCHESTER AVONDALE 1 Local 1,570 24 4,187 60 EXHIBIT A STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR OVERLAY BY DISTRICT DISTRICT 1 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY - continued STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 238300 CORNELIACIRE AVONDALE WESTCHESTER 1 Local 190 24 507 60 238100 CORNELIACIRW WESTCHESTER WESTCHESTER 1 Local 1,875 24 5,000 60 DISTRICT 2 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 108200 BOTSFORD GORDON REID DR 2 Local 450 24 1,200 57 358000 FT WORTH CAMPBELL COLLINS 2 Local 265 32 942 62 358100 FT WORTH COLLINS DABNEY 2 Local 255 32 907 62 DISTRICT 3 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 857800 SHAW HORNE RD YALE 3 Local 270 24 720 67 857900 SHAW YALE SHERMAN 3 Local 290 24 773 67 858000 SHAW SHERMAN HUDSON 3 Local 295 24 787 67 DISTRICT 3 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 858100 SHAW HUDSON HUDSON 3 Local 95 24 253 67 858200 SHAW HUDSON HARVARD 3 Local 365 24 973 67 858300 SHAW HARVARD HARRIET 3 Local 230 24 613 67 858400 SHAW HARRIET ISLLA 3 Local 240 24 640 67 858500 SHAW ISLLA CASTENON 3 Local 225 24 600 67 995200 VERA CRUZ MORGAN ZAPATA 3 Local 295 24 787 66 995300 VERA CRUZ ZAPATA GLORIA 3 Local 240 24 640 66 995400 VERA CRUZ GLORIA ZARAGOSA 3 Local 240 24 640 66 DISTRICT 4 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 84600 BERNICE DELTA EGYPTIAN 4 Local 275 36 1,100 59 84602 BERNICE EGYPTIAN PYRAMID 4 Local 265 36 1,060 59 84604 BERNICE PYRAMID WOOD LAWN 4 Local 265 36 1,060 59 84700 BERNICE WOOD LAWN ARNOLD 4 Local 265 24 707 59 84800 BERNICE ARNOLD CLARE 4 Local 265 27 795 59 84900 BERNICE CLARE RICKEY 4 Local 275 36 1,100 59 85000 BERNICE RICKEY SUSAN 4 Local 620 24 1,653 59 85100 BERNICE SUSAN BURR 4 Local 445 24 1,187 59 85200 BERNICE BURR MC ARDLE 4 Local 875 24 2,333 59 DISTRICT 5 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 33050 ALTHEA CT LIPES FICUS 5 Local 165 24 440 66 33051 ALTHEA CT FICUS DE 5 Local 180 24 480 66 34700 AMMER LAKE BISTINEAU DEAD END ( E) 5 Local 335 24 893 66 34704 AMMER LAKE BISTINEAU DEAD END (W) 5 Local 170 24 453 66 61700 BALDPATE PINTAIL BALDPATE CT 5 Local 305 24 813 58 61800 BALDPATE BALDPATE CT DRAKE 5 Local 285 24 760 58 61900 BALDPATE CT. BALDPATE DEAD END N. 5 Local 195 76 1,647 58 107400 BOROS NICKLAUS AARON 5 Local 1,135 24 3,027 66 107500 BOROS AARON DEAD END W 5 Local 415 24 1,107 66 EXHIBIT A STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT BY DISTRICT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) 1 ¥D2 PCI District 1 STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT 62000 BALDWIN LEOPARD HWY9 CANTWELL 1 A-1 1,230 58 7,927 75 62100 BALDWIN CANTWELL OMAHA ST 1 A-1 760 58 4,898 75 62200 BALDWIN OMAHA ST WESTCHESTER 1 A-1 715 58 4,608 75 62300 BALDWIN WESTCHESTER VILLA 1 A-1 1,185 58 7,637 75 62400 BALDWIN VILLA RUSSELL 1 A-1 1,010 58 6,509 75 62500 BALDWIN RUSSELL AGNES HWY44 1 A-1 875 58 5,639 75 149400 CALALLEN DR REDBIRD SMITH RD 1 C-1 715 38 3,019 73 149500 CALALLEN DR SMITH RD TEAGUE 1 C-1 1,555 38 6,566 73 199800 CHEYENNE AGNES LOU 1 C-1 620 24 1,653 81 199900 CHEYENNE LOU HURON 1 C-1 640 24 1,707 81 200000 CHEYENNE HURON CHIPPEWA 1 C-1 640 24 1,707 81 200100 CHEYENNE CHIPPEWA NAVAJO 1 C-1 640 24 1,707 81 200200 CHEYENNE NAVAJO BALDWIN 1 C-1 390 24 1,040 81 859300 SHAWNEE ST CHIPPEWA ST PINE ST 1 Local 770 24 2,053 79 859400 SHAWNEE ST PINE ST LOU ST 1 Local 505 24 1,347 79 STR ID 1 STREET FROM TO District Class! LENGTH (FT) 1 WIDTH (FT) 1 YD2 1 PCI District 2 STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT 35700 ANDOVER MCARDLE MTVERNON 2 Local 770 25 2,139 74 35800 ANDREWS REYNOSA PRESCOTT 2 Local 870 24 2,320 71 48000 ASHLAND GOLLIHAR COLLINGSWOOD 2 Local 765 24 2,040 77 336700 FIFTEENTH ELIZABETH MC KENZIE 2 Local 860 24 2,293 80 336800 FIFTEENTH MC KENZIE AYERS 2 Local 860 24 2,293 80 634800 MCARDLE ANDOVER HOLMES 2 C-3 290 58 1,869 73 634900 MCARDLE HOLMES SHOPPING WAY 2 A-1 1,455 58 9,377 73 853600 SEVENTEENTH ELIZABETH MC KENZIE 2 Local 860 24 2,293 77 853700 SEVENTEENTH MC KENZIE ISABEL 2 Local 860 24 2,293 77 853800 SEVENTEENTH ISABEL AYERS 2 Local 80 24 213 77 STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI District 3 STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT 33100 ALVIN DR. CALLAWAY DR. CAMWOOD DR. 3 Local 1,945 24 5,187 73 248400 CREST COLONY LN SYLVAN CREST CREST WILLOW DR 3 Local 985 24 2,627 74 248500 CREST COLONY LN CREST WILLOW DR CREST PEBBLE 3 Local 255 24 680 74 252600 CREST PEBBLE CREST VALLEY CREST COLONY 3 Local 535 24 1,427 73 443000 HORNE RD COLUMBIA THERESA 3 A-2 1,190 52 6,876 75 443100 HORNE RD THERESA ELVIRA 3 A-1 1,355 52 7,829 75 815400 SACKY DR AYERS RICHTER 3 Local 2,610 24 6,960 74 939900 SYLVAN CREST KOSTORYZ CREST COLONY LN 3 Local 180 24 480 76 940000 SYLVAN CREST CREST COLONY LN CREST WILLOW DR 3 Local 850 24 2,267 76 958200 TIGER LN CARRIAGE HITCHING POST 3 C-1 270 37 1,110 81 958300 TIGER LN HITCHING POST BUGGYWHIP 3 C-1 255 37 1,048 81 958400 TIGER LN BUGGYWHIP KOSTORYZ 3 C-1 255 36 1,020 81 STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) 1 YD2 PCI District 4 STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT 230400 COMPASS PARK ROAD 22 COMMODORES 4 Local 1,550 36 6,200 79 230500 COMPASS COMMODORES HEADSAIL 4 Local 500 24 1,333 79 230600 COMPASS HEADSAIL DEAD END N 4 Local 300 24 800 79 266100 DASMARINAS QUARTERDECK CROWN ROYAL DR 4 Local 1,820 36 7,280 71 266200 DASMARINAS CROWN ROYAL DR LANYARD 4 Local 520 36 2,080 71 266300 DASMARINAS LANYARD RUDDER 4 Local 1,205 36 4,820 71 266400 DASMARINAS RUDDER WINDJAMMER 4 Local 240 36 960 71 266600 DASMARINAS WINDJAMMER WHITECAP 4 Local 1,500 36 6,000 71 319400 ENCANTADA GYPSY FINISTERE 4 C-1 290 36 1,160 85 319500 ENCANTADA FINISTERE ESCAPADE 4 C-1 270 36 1,080 85 319600 ENCANTADA ESCAPADE DYNA 4 C-1 270 36 1,080 85 319700 ENCANTADA DYNA CUTTYSARK 4 C-1 270 36 1,080 85 319800 ENCANTADA CUTTYSARK CRUISER 4 C-1 375 36 1,500 85 319900 ENCANTADA CRUISER LINDO 4 C-1 280 36 1,120 85 319904 ENCANTADA LINDO PALMIRA 4 C-1 280 36 1,120 85 320000 ENCANTADA PALMIRA PARK ROAD 22 4 C-1 495 36 1,980 85 519700 LEEWARD DR DEAD END S WINDWARD DR 4 Local 870 26 2,513 79 EXHIBIT A STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT BY DISTRICT STR ID 1 STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) 1 WIDTH (FT) 1 YD2 1 PCI District 4 STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT continued 519800 LEEWARD DR WINDWARD DR ROBLA 4 C-1 730 56 4,542 79 519900 LEEWARD DR ROBLA ARUBA 4 C-1 530 56 3,298 79 519904 LEEWARD DR ARUBA STAUGUSTINE 4 C-1 770 56 4,791 79 520000 LEEWARD DR STAUGUSTINE GRANADA 4 C-1 740 56 4,604 79 520100 LEEWARD DR GRANADA STBARTHOLOMEW 4 C-1 510 26 1,473 79 STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) 1 YDZ PCI District 5 STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT 1950 ABORIGINE DR GREYSTONE DR CASSOWARY CT 5 Local 270 36 1,080 83 1951 ABORIGINE DR CASSOWARY CT EMU DR 5 Local 270 36 1,080 83 1952 ABORIGINE DR EMU DR GLADSTONE DR 5 Local 275 24 733 83 1953 ABORIGINE DR GLADSTONE DR EUCALYPTUS DR 5 Local 280 24 747 83 206500 CIMARRON BLVD SARATOGA BLVD DUNBARTON OAK 5 A-2 1,240 58 7,991 84 206600 CIMARRON BLVD DUNBARTON OAK BROCKHAMPTON 5 A-2 1,100 58 7,089 84 206700 CIMARRON BLVD BROCKHAMPTON NORTH WASHAM 5 A-1 775 58 4,994 84 206800 CIMARRON BLVD NORTH WASHAM MEGAN 5 A-1 920 58 5,929 84 206802 CIMARRON BLVD MEGAN BRIANNA 5 A-1 250 58 1,611 84 206804 CIMARRON BLVD BRIANNA PENNY 5 A-1 250 58 1,611 84 206806 CIMARRON BLVD PENNY LIPES 5 A-1 690 58 4,447 84 206900 CIMARRON BLVD LIPES BLVD YORK CROSSING 5 A-1 780 58 5,027 84 206901 CIMARRON BLVD YORK CROSSING QUEEN JANE 5 A-1 1,135 58 7,314 84 206902 CIMARRON BLVD QUEEN JANE YORKTOWN BLVD 5 A-1 700 58 4,511 84 DISTRICT 1 ALTERNATE STREETS -CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 66400 BANILY HEARN RD DEAD END 1 Local 140 24 373 73 78200 BEE MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN VIEW RED BLUFF 1 Local 390 24 1,040 73 204900 CHURCH ST. HIGHWAY 9 DEAD END N 1 Local 765 18 1,530 71 771000 REDBIRD W CALALLEN DR CORNETT 1 C-1 265 36 1,060 80 771100 REDBIRD W CORNETT AVEC 1 C-1 810 36 3,240 80 771200 REDBIRD W AVEC IH 37 1 C-1 400 36 1,600 80 DISTRICT 2 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 224500 COLLINGSWOOD LANSDOWN GOLLIHAR 2 Local 540 24 1,440 83 660700 NIMITZ EISENHOWER MAC ARTHUR 2 Local 955 24 2,547 83 877000 SIXTEENTH MORGAN PRESCOTT 2 Local 475 24 1,267 71 DISTRICT 3 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 40500 APOLLO KRAM EVANS 3 Local 1,015 32 3,609 71 40600 APOLLO EVANS DEAD END W 3 Local 450 32 1,600 71 363900 GEMINI NAVIGATION CENTAURUS 3 Local 890 24 2,373 77 364000 GEMINI CENTAURUS OMAHA 3 Local 625 24 1,667 77 DISTRICT 4 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 150855 CALGARY DR MANITOULIN ISLA SASKATCHEWAN DR 4 Local 270 24 720 78 150856 CALGARY DR SASKATCHEWAN DR LAS BRISAS ST 4 Local 535 24 1,427 78 150857 CALGARY DR LAS BRISAS ST CALGARY CT 4 Local 515 24 1,373 78 150858 CALGARY DR CALGARY CT NORTH OSO PARKWAY 4 Local 365 24 973 78 156900 CANTERBURY HINMAN EBONWOOD 4 Local 410 24 1,093 73 157000 CANTERBURY EBONWOOD KENTNER 4 Local 385 24 1,027 73 157100 CANTERBURY KENTNER IDLYWOOD 4 Local 255 24 680 73 157200 CANTERBURY IDLYWOOD RIO VISTA 4 Local 350 24 933 73 284000 DODDRIDGE OCEAN DR DENVER 4 A-1 295 48 1,573 78 284100 DODDRIDGE DENVER DENVER 4 A-1 90 48 480 78 EXHIBIT A STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT BY DISTRICT DISTRICT 4 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT - continued STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 284104 DODDRIDGE DENVER ARANSAS 4 A-1 235 48 1,253 78 284200 DODDRIDGE ARANSAS SANTA FE 4 A-1 330 48 1,760 78 DISTRICT 5 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 102850 BODEGA BAY DR NACOGDOCHES DR DEAD END 5 Local 390 24 1,040 83 319350 EMU DR TALDORA ST ABORIGINE ST 5 Local 800 24 2,133 84 366350 GLADSTONE DR ABORIGINE ST SYDNEY ST 5 Local 1,075 24 2,867 84 397450 GREYSTONE DR SLOUGH RD ABORIGINE DR 5 Local 170 56 1,058 83 397451 GREYSTONE DR ABORIGINE DR TALDORA ST 5 Local 790 36 3,160 83 397452 GREYSTONE DR TALDORA ST SYDNEY ST 5 Local 265 36 1,060 81 EXHIBIT A STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR OVERLAY ALPHABETICAL STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 12300 AIRLINE SARATOGA BLVD SANDRA LN 5 A-1 760 58 4,898 70 12400 AIRLINE SANDRA LN FITZHUGH DR 5 A-1 905 58 5,832 70 12500 AIRLINE FITZHUGH DR KRISTIN DR 5 A-1 240 58 1,547 70 12600 AIRLINE KRISTIN DR HOLLISTER DR 5 A-1 610 58 3,931 70 12700 AIRLINE HOLLISTER DR WOOLDRIDGE RD 5 A-1 430 68 3,249 70 15600 AIRLINE WILMA WILMA 4 A-1 165 56 1,027 63 15604 AIRLINE WILMA JARVIS 4 A-1 160 56 996 63 15700 AIRLINE JARVIS JARVIS 4 A-1 130 56 809 63 15704 AIRLINE JARVIS GAINES 4 A-1 135 56 840 63 15800 AIRLINE GAINES CAMDEN PL 4 A-1 460 48 2,453 63 15900 AIRLINE CAMDEN PL CAMDEN PL 4 A-1 655 48 3,493 63 16000 AIRLINE CAMDEN PL OCEAN DR 4 A-1 530 48 2,827 63 30600 ALICE MC ARDLE LAMONT 2 Local 1,150 24 3,067 59 33050 ALTHEA CT LIPES FICUS 5 Local 165 24 440 66 33051 ALTHEA CT FICUS DE 5 Local 180 24 480 66 34700 AMMER LAKE BISTINEAU DEAD END (E) 5 Local 335 24 893 66 34704 AMMER LAKE BISTINEAU DEAD END (W) 5 Local 170 24 453 66 43000 ARANSAS ST ROSSITER SANTA BARBARA 4 Local 310 28 964 66 43100 ARANSAS ST SANTA BARBARA CALIFORNIA 4 Local 300 28 933 66 43200 ARANSAS ST CALIFORNIA SINCLAIR 4 Local 310 28 964 66 43300 ARANSAS ST SINCLAIR CORDULA 4 Local 455 28 1,416 66 43400 ARANSAS ST CORDULA ROPES 4 Local 455 28 1,416 66 43500 ARANSAS ST ROPES DEAD END E 4 Local 840 27 2,520 66 44600 ARCTIC CIR. QUEBEC DR. DEAD END 4 Local 190 24 507 58 59100 AYERS ST GOLLIHAR VIOLA 2 A-1 420 23 1,073 62 59100 AYERS ST GOLLIHAR VIOLA 3 A-1 420 23 1,073 62 59200 AYERS ST VIOLA SUNNYBROOK 2 A-1 910 23 2,326 62 59200 AYERS ST VIOLA SUNNYBROOK 3 A-1 910 23 2,326 62 59300 AYERS ST SUNNYBROOK MANSHEIM 3 A-1 665 46 3,399 69 59400 AYERS ST MANSHEIM MC ARDLE 3 A-1 655 54 3,930 69 59500 AYERS ST MC ARDLE NEMEC ST 3 A-1 860 80 7,644 69 59600 AYERS ST NEMEC ST SPID (PADRE ISLAND D 3 A-1 370 80 3,289 69 61700 BALDPATE PINTAIL BALDPATE CT 5 Local 305 24 813 58 61800 BALDPATE BALDPATE CT DRAKE 5 Local 285 24 760 58 61900 BALDPATE CT. BALDPATE DEAD END N. 5 Local 195 76 1,647 58 70100 BARTLETT WILSON KREJCI LN 1 Local 230 24 613 56 70200 BARTLETT SAXET N WILSON 1 Local 300 27 900 56 70300 BARTLETT SAXET N SAXET S 1 Local 975 24 2,600 56 74000 BEACH DEAD END E GULF BREEZE 1 C-1 300 24 800 66 74100 BEACH GULF BREEZE SURFSIDE 1 C-1 340 24 907 66 74200 BEACH SURFSIDE TIMON BLVD 1 C-1 165 24 440 66 74300 BEACH TIMON BLVD SEAGULL 1 C-1 225 37 925 66 80000 BELMA AMBER WALDRON RD 4 Local 815 18 1,630 57 84600 BERNICE DELTA EGYPTIAN 4 Local 275 36 1,100 59 84602 BERNICE EGYPTIAN PYRAMID 4 Local 265 36 1,060 59 84604 BERNICE PYRAMID WOODLAWN 4 Local 265 36 1,060 59 84700 BERNICE WOODLAWN ARNOLD 4 Local 265 24 707 59 84800 BERNICE ARNOLD CLARE 4 Local 265 27 795 59 84900 BERNICE CLARE RICKEY 4 Local 275 36 1,100 59 85000 BERNICE RICKEY SUSAN 4 Local 620 24 1,653 59 85100 BERNICE SUSAN BURR 4 Local 445 24 1,187 59 85200 BERNICE BURR MC ARDLE 4 Local 875 24 2,333 59 98700 BLUE GRASS HORSE SHOES FRONTIER 1 Local 845 24 2,253 56 98800 BLUE GRASS FRONTIER OUTPOST DR 1 Local 1,055 24 2,813 56 107400 BOROS NICKLAUS AARON 5 Local 1,135 24 3,027 66 107500 BOROS AARON DEAD END W 5 Local 415 24 1,107 66 108200 BOTSFORD GORDON REID DR 2 Local 450 24 1,200 57 108300 BOULDER CIR. TIMBERLINE DR DEAD END S. 1 Local 210 24 560 57 109300 BRADFORD WEBER RD WEIR 2 Local 660 24 1,760 61 146900 CABRA LAKE LAKE 1 Local 85 24 227 59 146904 CABRA LAKE CHIPITO 1 Local 280 24 747 59 177800 CASA BONITA ORLANDO TEXAN TRAIL 2 Local 600 24 1,600 56 177900 CASA BONITA TEXAN TRAIL CASA LINDA 2 Local 730 24 1,947 56 189800 CENTER DR SHOPPING CENTER DELAINE 4 Local 140 24 373 62 189900 CENTER DR DELAINE JACKSON PLACE 4 Local 240 24 640 62 190000 CENTER DR JACKSON PLACE GRANT 4 Local 280 24 747 62 190100 CENTER DR GRANT CATALINA 4 Local 310 24 827 62 EXHIBIT A STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR OVERLAY ALPHABETICAL STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 190200 CENTER DR CATALINA PEERMAN 4 Local 310 24 827 62 190300 CENTER DR PEERMAN PASADENA 4 Local 300 24 800 62 190400 CENTER DR PASADENA SANTA MONICA 4 Local 300 24 800 62 190500 CENTER DR SANTA MONICA BERMUDA 4 Local 300 24 800 62 190600 CENTER DR BERMUDA WILLIAMSON 4 Local 305 24 813 62 190700 CENTER DR WILLIAMSON DOLPHIN 4 Local 290 24 773 62 190800 CENTER DR DOLPHIN DOLPHIN 4 Local 90 24 240 62 190802 CENTER DR DOLPHIN BARRACUDA 4 Local 210 24 560 62 190900 CENTER DR BARRACUDA BARRACUDA 4 Local 135 24 360 62 190902 CENTER DR BARRACUDA CORAL 4 Local 155 24 413 62 191000 CENTER DR CORAL MIRAMAR 4 Local 295 24 787 62 191100 CENTER DR MIRAMAR PL CARMEL PARKWAY 4 Local 290 24 773 62 213200 CLEAR FORK DR PRAIRIE CREEK RED RIVER DR 1 Local 980 24 2,613 60 238200 CORNELIA CIRE WESTCHESTER AVONDALE 1 Local 1,570 24 4,187 60 238300 CORNELIA CIRE AVONDALE WESTCHESTER 1 Local 190 24 507 60 238100 CORNELIA CIRW WESTCHESTER WESTCHESTER 1 Local 1,875 24 5,000 60 247200 CRENSHAW WOOD IRON AARON 5 Local 1,490 24 3,973 68 286000 DOGWOOD STARLITE ROCKWOOD 1 Local 1,430 24 3,813 60 299600 EAGLE DR WOOD -IRON AARON DR 5 Local 1,350 24 3,600 65 317200 ELMORE BROOKS MC LEOD 1 Local 320 24 853 67 317300 ELMORE MC LEOD HIGHWAY 9 1 Local 500 24 1,333 67 322300 ERWIN AVE MUELLER COLIMA 1 Local 620 30 2,067 64 322400 ERWIN AVE COLIMA INTERSTATE 37 1 Local 180 30 600 64 358000 FT WORTH CAMPBELL COLLINS 2 Local 265 32 942 62 358100 FT WORTH COLLINS DABNEY 2 Local 255 32 907 62 370100 GLENWOOD STARLITE ROCKWOOD 1 Local 940 24 2,507 59 420700 HEBERT SANDERS ACUSHNET 5 Local 1,400 24 3,733 59 485600 KINGWOOD STARLITE WESTWOOD 1 Local 1,775 24 4,733 56 505500 LAMONT WEIR WEBER RD 2 Local 660 24 1,760 61 512700 LARKSPUR TROJAN DR MANSHEIM 3 Local 665 24 1,773 61 512800 LARKSPUR MANSHEIM GARDEN DR 3 Local 665 24 1,773 61 512900 LARKSPUR GARDEN DR GOLLIHAR 3 Local 1,285 24 3,427 61 614900 MORAVIAN LAMONT MCARDLE 2 Local 1,150 24 3,067 56 675500 OAK PARK AVE UP RIVER RD OAK PARK AVE 1 Local 415 40 1,844 69 675504 OAK PARK AVE OAK PARK AVE MUELLER 1 Local 760 40 3,378 69 675506 OAK PARK AVE UP RIVER RD OAK PARK AVE 1 Local 390 40 1,733 69 675600 OAK PARK AVE MUELLER COLIMA 1 Local 585 40 2,600 69 682600 ODEM NICHOLSON GOLLIHAR 2 Local 1,280 24 3,413 60 690500 ORCHID TROJAN DR MANSHEIM 3 Local 665 24 1,773 56 690600 ORCHID MANSHEIM GARDEN 3 Local 660 24 1,760 56 690700 ORCHID GARDEN GOLLIHAR 3 Local 1,280 24 3,413 56 695600 OSO PARKWAY BEAUVAIS VALTOURMANCHE 5 P-1 600 32 2,133 60 695700 OSO PARKWAY VALTOURMANCHE PIEDRABUENA 5 P-1 410 32 1,458 60 695800 OSO PARKWAY PIEDRABUENA VALDEMORILLO 5 P-1 385 32 1,369 60 695900 OSO PARKWAY VALDEMORILLO CAMPODOLCINO 5 P-1 400 32 1,422 60 696000 OSO PARKWAY CAMPODOLCINO BAR -LE -DOC 5 P-1 1,000 32 3,556 60 696500 OSO PARKWAY MARSEILLE (E) ETIENNE 5 P-1 505 36 2,020 60 696600 OSO PARKWAY ETIENNE LENS DR 5 P-1 170 36 680 60 695500 OSO PKWY (N) STAPLES ST BEAUVAIS 5 P-1 345 32 1,227 60 695510 OSO PKWY (S) STAPLES BEAUVAIS 5 P-1 345 32 1,227 60 750300 PRAIRIE CRK DR CLEAR FORK DR MEDINA SPRINGS 1 Local 620 24 1,653 61 750400 PRAIRIE CRK DR MEDINA SPRINGS RED RIVER DR 1 Local 405 24 1,080 61 759000 PYLE DR WEBER WEIR 2 Local 630 24 1,680 67 817100 SAGEBRUSH OUTPOST ROCKWOOD 1 Local 1,010 24 2,693 66 857800 SHAW HORNE RD YALE 3 Local 270 24 720 67 857900 SHAW YALE SHERMAN 3 Local 290 24 773 67 858000 SHAW SHERMAN HUDSON 3 Local 295 24 787 67 858100 SHAW HUDSON HUDSON 3 Local 95 24 253 67 858200 SHAW HUDSON HARVARD 3 Local 365 24 973 67 858300 SHAW HARVARD HARRIET 3 Local 230 24 613 67 858400 SHAW HARRIET ISLLA 3 Local 240 24 640 67 858500 SHAW ISLLA CASTENON 3 Local 225 24 600 67 875000 SILVERSPUR HORSE SHOE FRONTIER 1 Local 990 24 2,640 63 894200 SPRING ST CUIPER ALEXANDER 2 Local 640 24 1,707 62 894300 SPRING ST ALEXANDER RAMSEY 2 Local 545 24 1,453 62 894400 SPRING ST RAMSEY GOLLIHAR 2 Local 290 24 773 62 995200 VERA CRUZ MORGAN ZAPATA 3 Local 295 24 787 66 EXHIBIT A STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR OVERLAY ALPHABETICAL STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 995300 VERA CRUZ ZAPATA GLORIA 3 Local 240 24 640 66 995400 VERA CRUZ GLORIA ZARAGOSA 3 Local 240 24 640 66 998700 VICTORIA PARK WOOLDRIDGE QUEBEC 4 C-1 1,460 24 3,893 69 1009900 WALDRON RD CARIBBEAN BAYBERRY N 4 A-1 845 24 2,253 57 1010000 WALDRON RD BAYBERRY N BAYBERRY S 4 A-1 320 24 853 57 1010100 WALDRON RD BAYBERRY S MEDITERRANEAN 4 A-1 585 24 1,560 57 1010102 WALDRON RD MEDITERRANEAN YORKTOWN 4 A-1 3,550 24 9,467 57 1046800 WIND ROCK HORSE SHOE FRONTIER 1 Local 1,060 24 2,827 69 EXHIBIT A STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT ALPHABETICAL STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 1950 ABORIGINE DR GREYSTONE DR CASSOWARY CT 5 Local 270 36 1,080 83 1951 ABORIGINE DR CASSOWARY CT EMU DR 5 Local 270 36 1,080 83 1952 ABORIGINE DR EMU DR GLADSTONE DR 5 Local 275 24 733 83 1953 ABORIGINE DR GLADSTONE DR EUCALYPTUS DR 5 Local 280 24 747 83 33100 ALVIN DR. CALLAWAY DR. CAMWOOD DR. 3 Local 1,945 24 5,187 73 35700 ANDOVER MCARDLE MTVERNON 2 Local 770 25 2,139 74 35800 ANDREWS REYNOSA PRESCOTT 2 Local 870 24 2,320 71 40500 APOLLO KRAM EVANS 3 Local 1,015 32 3,609 71 40600 APOLLO EVANS DEAD END W 3 Local 450 32 1,600 71 48000 ASHLAND GOLLIHAR COLLINGSWOOD 2 Local 765 24 2,040 77 62000 BALDWIN LEOPARD HWY9 CANTWELL 1 A-1 1,230 58 7,927 75 62100 BALDWIN CANTWELL OMAHA ST 1 A-1 760 58 4,898 75 62200 BALDWIN OMAHA ST WESTCHESTER 1 A-1 715 58 4,608 75 62300 BALDWIN WESTCHESTER VILLA 1 A-1 1,185 58 7,637 75 62400 BALDWIN VILLA RUSSELL 1 A-1 1,010 58 6,509 75 62500 BALDWIN RUSSELL AGNES HWY44 1 A-1 875 58 5,639 75 66400 BANILY HEARN RD DEAD END 1 Local 140 24 373 73 78200 BEE MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN VIEW RED BLUFF 1 Local 390 24 1,040 73 102850 BODEGA BAY DR NACOGDOCHES DR DEAD END 5 Local 390 24 1,040 83 149400 CALALLEN DR REDBIRD SMITH RD 1 C-1 715 38 3,019 73 149500 CALALLEN DR SMITH RD TEAGUE 1 C-1 1,555 38 6,566 73 150855 CALGARY DR MANITOULIN ISLA SASKATCHEWAN DR 4 Local 270 24 720 78 150856 CALGARY DR SASKATCHEWAN DR LAS BRISAS ST 4 Local 535 24 1,427 78 150857 CALGARY DR LAS BRISAS ST CALGARY CT 4 Local 515 24 1,373 78 150858 CALGARY DR CALGARY CT NORTH OSO PARKWAY 4 Local 365 24 973 78 156900 CANTERBURY HINMAN EBONWOOD 4 Local 410 24 1,093 73 157000 CANTERBURY EBONWOOD KENTNER 4 Local 385 24 1,027 73 157100 CANTERBURY KENTNER IDLYWOOD 4 Local 255 24 680 73 157200 CANTERBURY IDLYWOOD RIO VISTA 4 Local 350 24 933 73 199800 CHEYENNE AGNES LOU 1 C-1 620 24 1,653 81 199900 CHEYENNE LOU HURON 1 C-1 640 24 1,707 81 200000 CHEYENNE HURON CHIPPEWA 1 C-1 640 24 1,707 81 200100 CHEYENNE CHIPPEWA NAVAJO 1 C-1 640 24 1,707 81 200200 CHEYENNE NAVAJO BALDWIN 1 C-1 390 24 1,040 81 204900 CHURCH ST. HIGHWAY 9 DEAD END N 1 Local 765 18 1,530 71 206500 CIMARRON BLVD SARATOGA BLVD DUNBARTON OAK 5 A-2 1,240 58 7,991 84 206600 CIMARRON BLVD DUNBARTON OAK BROCKHAMPTON 5 A-2 1,100 58 7,089 84 206700 CIMARRON BLVD BROCKHAMPTON NORTH WASHAM 5 A-1 775 58 4,994 84 206800 CIMARRON BLVD NORTH WASHAM MEGAN 5 A-1 920 58 5,929 84 206802 CIMARRON BLVD MEGAN BRIANNA 5 A-1 250 58 1,611 84 206804 CIMARRON BLVD BRIANNA PENNY 5 A-1 250 58 1,611 84 206806 CIMARRON BLVD PENNY LIPES 5 A-1 690 58 4,447 84 206900 CIMARRON BLVD LIPES BLVD YORK CROSSING 5 A-1 780 58 5,027 84 206901 CIMARRON BLVD YORK CROSSING QUEEN JANE 5 A-1 1,135 58 7,314 84 206902 CIMARRON BLVD QUEEN JANE YORKTOWN BLVD 5 A-1 700 58 4,511 84 224500 COLLINGSWOOD LANSDOWN GOLLIHAR 2 Local 540 24 1,440 83 230400 COMPASS PARK ROAD 22 COMMODORES 4 Local 1,550 36 6,200 79 230500 COMPASS COMMODORES HEADSAIL 4 Local 500 24 1,333 79 230600 COMPASS HEADSAIL DEAD END N 4 Local 300 24 800 79 248400 CREST COLONY LN SYLVAN CREST CREST WILLOW DR 3 Local 985 24 2,627 74 248500 CREST COLONY LN CREST WILLOW DR CREST PEBBLE 3 Local 255 24 680 74 252600 CREST PEBBLE CREST VALLEY CREST COLONY 3 Local 535 24 1,427 73 266100 DASMARINAS QUARTERDECK CROWN ROYAL DR 4 Local 1,820 36 7,280 71 266200 DASMARINAS CROWN ROYAL DR LANYARD 4 Local 520 36 2,080 71 266300 DASMARINAS LANYARD RUDDER 4 Local 1,205 36 4,820 71 266400 DASMARINAS RUDDER WINDJAMMER 4 Local 240 36 960 71 266600 DASMARINAS WINDJAMMER WHITECAP 4 Local 1,500 36 6,000 71 284000 DODDRIDGE OCEAN DR DENVER 4 A-1 295 48 1,573 78 284100 DODDRIDGE DENVER DENVER 4 A-1 90 48 480 78 284104 DODDRIDGE DENVER ARANSAS 4 A-1 235 48 1,253 78 284200 DODDRIDGE ARANSAS SANTA FE 4 A-1 330 48 1,760 78 319350 EMU DR TALDORA ST ABORIGINE ST 5 Local 800 24 2,133 84 319400 ENCANTADA GYPSY FINISTERE 4 C-1 290 36 1,160 85 319500 ENCANTADA FINISTERE ESCAPADE 4 C-1 270 36 1,080 85 319600 ENCANTADA ESCAPADE DYNA 4 C-1 270 36 1,080 85 319700 ENCANTADA DYNA CUTTYSARK 4 C-1 270 36 1,080 85 319800 ENCANTADA CUTTYSARK CRUISER 4 C-1 375 36 1,500 85 EXHIBIT A STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT ALPHABETICAL STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 319900 ENCANTADA CRUISER LINDO 4 C-1 280 36 1,120 85 319904 ENCANTADA LINDO PALMIRA 4 C-1 280 36 1,120 85 320000 ENCANTADA PALMIRA PARK ROAD 22 4 C-1 495 36 1,980 85 336700 FIFTEENTH ELIZABETH MC KENZIE 2 Local 860 24 2,293 80 336800 FIFTEENTH MC KENZIE AYERS 2 Local 860 24 2,293 80 363900 GEMINI NAVIGATION CENTAURUS 3 Local 890 24 2,373 77 364000 GEMINI CENTAURUS OMAHA 3 Local 625 24 1,667 77 366350 GLADSTONE DR ABORIGINE ST SYDNEY ST 5 Local 1,075 24 2,867 84 397450 GREYSTONE DR SLOUGH RD ABORIGINE DR 5 Local 170 56 1,058 83 397451 GREYSTONE DR ABORIGINE DR TALDORA ST 5 Local 790 36 3,160 83 397452 GREYSTONE DR TALDORA ST SYDNEY ST 5 Local 265 36 1,060 81 443000 HORNE RD COLUMBIA THERESA 3 A-2 1,190 52 6,876 75 443100 HORNE RD THERESA ELVIRA 3 A-1 1,355 52 7,829 75 519700 LEEWARD DR DEAD END S WINDWARD DR 4 Local 870 26 2,513 79 519800 LEEWARD DR WINDWARD DR ROBLA 4 C-1 730 56 4,542 79 519900 LEEWARD DR ROBLA ARUBA 4 C-1 530 56 3,298 79 519904 LEEWARD DR ARUBA STAUGUSTINE 4 C-1 770 56 4,791 79 520000 LEEWARD DR STAUGUSTINE GRANADA 4 C-1 740 56 4,604 79 520100 LEEWARD DR GRANADA STBARTHOLOMEW 4 C-1 510 26 1,473 79 634800 MCARDLE ANDOVER HOLMES 2 C-3 290 58 1,869 73 634900 MCARDLE HOLMES SHOPPING WAY 2 A-1 1,455 58 9,377 73 660700 NIMITZ EISENHOWER MAC ARTHUR 2 Local 955 24 2,547 83 771000 REDBIRD W CALALLEN DR CORNETT 1 C-1 265 36 1,060 80 771100 REDBIRD W CORNETT AVEC 1 C-1 810 36 3,240 80 771200 REDBIRD W AVEC IH 37 1 C-1 400 36 1,600 80 815400 SACKY DR AYERS RICHTER 3 Local 2,610 24 6,960 74 853600 SEVENTEENTH ELIZABETH MC KENZIE 2 Local 860 24 2,293 77 853700 SEVENTEENTH MC KENZIE ISABEL 2 Local 860 24 2,293 77 853800 SEVENTEENTH ISABEL AYERS 2 Local 80 24 213 77 859300 SHAWNEE ST CHIPPEWA ST PINE ST 1 Local 770 24 2,053 79 859400 SHAWNEE ST PINE ST LOU ST 1 Local 505 24 1,347 79 877000 SIXTEENTH MORGAN PRESCOTT 2 Local 475 24 1,267 71 939900 SYLVAN CREST KOSTORYZ CREST COLONY LN 3 Local 180 24 480 76 940000 SYLVAN CREST CREST COLONY LN CREST WILLOW DR 3 Local 850 24 2,267 76 958200 TIGER LN CARRIAGE HITCHING POST 3 C-1 270 37 1,110 81 958300 TIGER LN HITCHING POST BUGGYWHIP 3 C-1 255 37 1,048 81 958400 TIGER LN BUGGYWHIP KOSTORYZ 3 C-1 255 36 1,020 81 IWILMA 1 4 1 A-1 1 165 1 56 1 1,027 1 63 1 STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR OVERLAY BY DISTRICT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) 1 YDZ PCI District 1 STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY 70100 BARTLETT WILSON KREJCI LN 1 Local 230 24 613 56 70200 BARTLETT SAXET N WILSON 1 Local 300 27 900 56 70300 BARTLETT SAXET N SAXET S 1 Local 975 24 2,600 56 74000 BEACH DEAD END E GULF BREEZE 1 C-1 300 24 800 66 74100 BEACH GULF BREEZE SURFSIDE 1 C-1 340 24 907 66 74200 BEACH SURFSIDE TIMON BLVD 1 C-1 165 24 440 66 74300 BEACH TIMON BLVD SEAGULL 1 C-1 225 37 925 66 98700 BLUE GRASS HORSE SHOES FRONTIER 1 Local 845 24 2,253 56 98800 BLUE GRASS FRONTIER OUTPOST DR 1 Local 1,055 24 2,813 56 108300 BOULDER CIR. TIMBERLINE DR DEAD END S. 1 Local 210 24 560 57 213200 CLEAR FORK DR PRAIRIE CREEK RED RIVER DR 1 Local 980 24 2,613 60 286000 DOGWOOD STARLITE ROCKWOOD 1 Local 1,430 24 3,813 60 317200 ELMORE BROOKS MC LEOD 1 Local 320 24 853 67 317300 ELMORE MC LEOD HIGHWAY 9 1 Local 500 24 1,333 67 322300 ERWIN AVE MUELLER COLIMA 1 Local 620 30 2,067 64 322400 ERWIN AVE COLIMA INTERSTATE 37 1 Local 180 30 600 64 370100 GLENWOOD STARLITE ROCKWOOD 1 Local 940 24 2,507 59 485600 KINGWOOD STARLITE WESTWOOD 1 Local 1,775 24 4,733 56 675500 OAK PARK AVE UP RIVER RD OAK PARK AVE 1 Local 415 40 1,844 69 675504 OAK PARK AVE OAK PARK AVE MUELLER 1 Local 760 40 3,378 69 675506 OAK PARK AVE UP RIVER RD OAK PARK AVE 1 Local 390 40 1,733 69 675600 OAK PARK AVE MUELLER COLIMA 1 Local 585 40 2,600 69 750300 PRAIRIE CRK DR CLEAR FORK DR MEDINA SPRINGS 1 Local 620 24 1,653 61 750400 PRAIRIE CRK DR MEDINA SPRINGS RED RIVER DR 1 Local 405 24 1,080 61 817100 SAGEBRUSH OUTPOST ROCKWOOD 1 Local 1,010 24 2,693 66 875000 SILVERSPUR HORSE SHOE FRONTIER 1 Local 990 24 2,640 63 1046800 WIND ROCK HORSE SHOE FRONTIER 1 Local 1,060 24 2,827 69 STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) 1 YD2 PCI District 2 STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY 30600 ALICE MC ARDLE LAMONT 2 Local 1,150 24 3,067 59 59100 AYERS ST GOLLIHAR VIOLA 2 A-1 420 23 1,073 62 59200 AYERS ST VIOLA SUNNYBROOK 2 A-1 910 23 2,326 62 109300 BRADFORD WEBER RD WEIR 2 Local 660 24 1,760 61 177800 CASA BONITA ORLANDO TEXAN TRAIL 2 Local 600 24 1,600 56 177900 CASA BONITA TEXAN TRAIL CASA LINDA 2 Local 730 24 1,947 56 505500 LAMONT WEIR WEBER RD 2 Local 660 24 1,760 61 614900 MORAVIAN LAMONT MC ARDLE 2 Local 1,150 24 3,067 56 682600 ODEM NICHOLSON GOLLIHAR 2 Local 1,280 24 3,413 60 759000 PYLE DR WEBER WEIR 2 Local 630 24 1,680 67 894200 SPRING ST CUIPER ALEXANDER 2 Local 640 24 1,707 62 894300 SPRING ST ALEXANDER RAMSEY 2 Local 545 24 1,453 62 894400 SPRING ST RAMSEY GOLLIHAR 2 Local 290 24 773 62 STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) 1 YD2 PCI District 3 STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY 59100 AYERS ST GOLLIHAR VIOLA 3 A-1 420 23 1,073 62 59200 AYERS ST VIOLA SUNNYBROOK 3 A-1 910 23 2,326 62 59300 AYERS ST SUNNYBROOK MANSHEIM 3 A-1 665 46 3,399 69 59400 AYERS ST MANSHEIM MC ARDLE 3 A-1 655 54 3,930 69 59500 AYERS ST MC ARDLE NEMEC ST 3 A-1 860 80 7,644 69 59600 AYERS ST NEMEC ST SPID (PADRE ISLAND D 3 A-1 370 80 3,289 69 512700 LARKSPUR TROJAN DR MANSHEIM 3 Local 665 24 1,773 61 512800 LARKSPUR MANSHEIM GARDEN DR 3 Local 665 24 1,773 61 512900 LARKSPUR GARDEN DR GOLLIHAR 3 Local 1,285 24 3,427 61 690500 ORCHID TROJAN DR MANSHEIM 3 Local 665 24 1,773 56 690600 ORCHID MANSHEIM GARDEN 3 Local 660 24 1,760 56 690700 ORCHID GARDEN GOLLIHAR 3 Local 1,280 24 3,413 56 STR ID 1 STREET 1 FROM 1 TO IDistrictIClassl LENGTH (FT) 1 WIDTH (FT) 1 YD2 1 PCI District 4 STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY 15600 (AIRLINE IWILMA STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR OVERLAY BY DISTRICT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) 1 YD2 PCI District 4 STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY - continued 15604 AIRLINE WILMA JARVIS 4 A-1 160 56 996 63 15700 AIRLINE JARVIS JARVIS 4 A-1 130 56 809 63 15704 AIRLINE JARVIS GAINES 4 A-1 135 56 840 63 15800 AIRLINE GAINES CAMDEN PL 4 A-1 460 48 2,453 63 15900 AIRLINE CAMDEN PL CAMDEN PL 4 A-1 655 48 3,493 63 16000 AIRLINE CAMDEN PL OCEAN DR 4 A-1 530 48 2,827 63 43000 ARANSAS ST ROSSITER SANTA BARBARA 4 Local 310 28 964 66 43100 ARANSAS ST SANTA BARBARA CALIFORNIA 4 Local 300 28 933 66 43200 ARANSAS ST CALIFORNIA SINCLAIR 4 Local 310 28 964 66 STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) 1 YD2 PCI District 4 STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY - continued 43300 ARANSAS ST SINCLAIR CORDULA 4 Local 455 28 1,416 66 43400 ARANSAS ST CORDULA ROPES 4 Local 455 28 1,416 66 43500 ARANSAS ST ROPES DEAD END E 4 Local 840 27 2,520 66 44600 ARCTIC CIR. QUEBEC DR. DEAD END 4 Local 190 24 507 58 80000 BELMA AMBER WALDRON RD 4 Local 815 18 1,630 57 189800 CENTER DR SHOPPING CENTER DELAINE 4 Local 140 24 373 62 189900 CENTER DR DELAINE JACKSON PLACE 4 Local 240 24 640 62 190000 CENTER DR JACKSON PLACE GRANT 4 Local 280 24 747 62 190100 CENTER DR GRANT CATALINA 4 Local 310 24 827 62 190200 CENTER DR CATALINA PEERMAN 4 Local 310 24 827 62 190300 CENTER DR PEERMAN PASADENA 4 Local 300 24 800 62 190400 CENTER DR PASADENA SANTA MONICA 4 Local 300 24 800 62 190500 CENTER DR SANTA MONICA BERMUDA 4 Local 300 24 800 62 190600 CENTER DR BERMUDA WILLIAMSON 4 Local 305 24 813 62 190700 CENTER DR WILLIAMSON DOLPHIN 4 Local 290 24 773 62 190800 CENTER DR DOLPHIN DOLPHIN 4 Local 90 24 240 62 190802 CENTER DR DOLPHIN BARRACUDA 4 Local 210 24 560 62 190900 CENTER DR BARRACUDA BARRACUDA 4 Local 135 24 360 62 190902 CENTER DR BARRACUDA CORAL 4 Local 155 24 413 62 191000 CENTER DR CORAL MIRAMAR 4 Local 295 24 787 62 191100 CENTER DR MIRAMAR PL CARMEL PARKWAY 4 Local 290 24 773 62 998700 VICTORIA PARK WOOLDRIDGE QUEBEC 4 C-1 1,460 24 3,893 69 1009900 WALDRON RD CARIBBEAN BAYBERRY N 4 A-1 845 24 2,253 57 1010000 WALDRON RD BAYBERRY N BAYBERRY S 4 A-1 320 24 853 57 1010100 WALDRON RD BAYBERRY S MEDITERRANEAN 4 A-1 585 24 1,560 57 1010102 WALDRON RD MEDITERRANEAN YORKTOWN 4 A-1 3,550 24 9,467 57 STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) 1 YD2 PCI District 5 STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY 12300 AIRLINE SARATOGA BLVD SANDRA LN 5 A-1 760 58 4,898 70 12400 AIRLINE SANDRA LN FITZHUGH DR 5 A-1 905 58 5,832 70 12500 AIRLINE FITZHUGH DR KRISTIN DR 5 A-1 240 58 1,547 70 STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) 1 YD2 PCI District 5 STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY 12600 AIRLINE KRISTIN DR HOLLISTER DR 5 A-1 610 58 3,931 70 12700 AIRLINE HOLLISTER DR WOOLDRIDGE RD 5 A-1 430 68 3,249 70 247200 CRENSHAW WOOD IRON AARON 5 Local 1,490 24 3,973 68 299600 EAGLE DR WOOD -IRON AARON DR 5 Local 1,350 24 3,600 65 420700 HEBERT SANDERS ACUSHNET 5 Local 1,400 24 3,733 59 695600 OSO PARKWAY BEAUVAIS VALTOURMANCHE 5 P-1 600 32 2,133 60 695700 OSO PARKWAY VALTOURMANCHE PIEDRABUENA 5 P-1 410 32 1,458 60 695800 OSO PARKWAY PIEDRABUENA VALDEMORILLO 5 P-1 385 32 1,369 60 695900 OSO PARKWAY VALDEMORILLO CAMPODOLCINO 5 P-1 400 32 1,422 60 696000 OSO PARKWAY CAMPODOLCINO BAR -LE -DOC 5 P-1 1,000 32 3,556 60 696500 OSO PARKWAY MARSEILLE (E) ETIENNE 5 P-1 505 36 2,020 60 696600 OSO PARKWAY ETIENNE LENS DR 5 P-1 170 36 680 60 695500 OSO PKWY (N) STAPLES ST BEAUVAIS 5 P-1 345 32 1,227 60 695510 IOSO PKWY (S) (STAPLES 'BEAUVAIS 1 5 1 P-1 1 345 1 32 1 1,227 1 60 I STR ID 1 STREET 1 FROM 1 TO IDistrictlClass' LENGTH (FT) 1 WIDTH (FT) 1 YD2 1 PCI District 5 STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY - continued STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR OVERLAY BY DISTRICT DISTRICT 1 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 146900 CABRA LAKE LAKE 1 Local 85 24 227 59 146904 CABRA LAKE CHIPITO 1 Local 280 24 747 59 238200 CORNELIA CIRE WESTCHESTER AVONDALE 1 Local 1,570 24 4,187 60 238300 CORNELIA CIRE AVONDALE WESTCHESTER 1 Local 190 24 507 60 238100 CORNELIA CIRW WESTCHESTER WESTCHESTER 1 Local 1,875 24 5,000 60 DISTRICT 2 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 108200 BOTSFORD GORDON REID DR 2 Local 450 24 1,200 57 358000 FT WORTH CAMPBELL COLLINS 2 Local 265 32 942 62 358100 FT WORTH COLLINS DABNEY 2 Local 255 32 907 62 DISTRICT 3 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 857800 SHAW HORNE RD YALE 3 Local 270 24 720 67 857900 SHAW YALE SHERMAN 3 Local 290 24 773 67 858000 SHAW SHERMAN HUDSON 3 Local 295 24 787 67 DISTRICT 3 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 858100 SHAW HUDSON HUDSON 3 Local 95 24 253 67 858200 SHAW HUDSON HARVARD 3 Local 365 24 973 67 858300 SHAW HARVARD HARRIET 3 Local 230 24 613 67 858400 SHAW HARRIET ISLLA 3 Local 240 24 640 67 858500 SHAW ISLLA CASTENON 3 Local 225 24 600 67 995200 VERA CRUZ MORGAN ZAPATA 3 Local 295 24 787 66 995300 VERA CRUZ ZAPATA GLORIA 3 Local 240 24 640 66 995400 VERA CRUZ GLORIA ZARAGOSA 3 Local 240 24 640 66 DISTRICT 4 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 84600 BERNICE DELTA EGYPTIAN 4 Local 275 36 1,100 59 84602 BERNICE EGYPTIAN PYRAMID 4 Local 265 36 1,060 59 84604 BERNICE PYRAMID WOODLAWN 4 Local 265 36 1,060 59 84700 BERNICE WOODLAWN ARNOLD 4 Local 265 24 707 59 84800 BERNICE ARNOLD CLARE 4 Local 265 27 795 59 84900 BERNICE CLARE RICKEY 4 Local 275 36 1,100 59 85000 BERNICE RICKEY SUSAN 4 Local 620 24 1,653 59 85100 BERNICE SUSAN BURR 4 Local 445 24 1,187 59 85200 BERNICE BURR MC ARDLE 4 Local 875 24 2,333 59 DISTRICT 5 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR OVERLAY STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 33050 ALTHEA CT LIPES FICUS 5 Local 165 24 440 66 33051 ALTHEA CT FICUS DE 5 Local 180 24 480 66 34700 AMMER LAKE BISTINEAU DEAD END ( E) 5 Local 335 24 893 66 34704 AMMER LAKE BISTINEAU DEAD END (W) 5 Local 170 24 453 66 61700 BALDPATE PINTAIL BALDPATE CT 5 Local 305 24 813 58 61800 BALDPATE BALDPATE CT DRAKE 5 Local 285 24 760 58 61900 BALDPATE CT. BALDPATE DEAD END N. 5 Local 195 76 1,647 58 107400 BOROS NICKLAUS AARON 5 Local 1,135 24 3,027 66 107500 BOROS AARON DEAD END W 5 Local 415 24 1,107 66 STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT BY DISTRICT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YDZ PCI District 1 STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT 62000 BALDWIN LEOPARD HWY9 CANTWELL 1 A-1 1,230 58 7,927 75 62100 BALDWIN CANTWELL OMAHA ST 1 A-1 760 58 4,898 75 62200 BALDWIN OMAHA ST WESTCHESTER 1 A-1 715 58 4,608 75 62300 BALDWIN WESTCHESTER VILLA 1 A-1 1,185 58 7,637 75 62400 BALDWIN VILLA RUSSELL 1 A-1 1,010 58 6,509 75 62500 BALDWIN RUSSELL AGNES HWY44 1 A-1 875 58 5,639 75 149400 CALALLEN DR REDBIRD SMITH RD 1 C-1 715 38 3,019 73 149500 CALALLEN DR SMITH RD TEAGUE 1 C-1 1,555 38 6,566 73 199800 CHEYENNE AGNES LOU 1 C-1 620 24 1,653 81 199900 CHEYENNE LOU HURON 1 C-1 640 24 1,707 81 200000 CHEYENNE HURON CHIPPEWA 1 C-1 640 24 1,707 81 200100 CHEYENNE CHIPPEWA NAVAJO 1 C-1 640 24 1,707 81 200200 CHEYENNE NAVAJO BALDWIN 1 C-1 390 24 1,040 81 859300 SHAWNEE ST CHIPPEWA ST PINE ST 1 Local 770 24 2,053 79 859400 SHAWNEE ST PINE ST LOU ST 1 Local 505 24 1,347 79 STR ID 1 STREET FROM TO District Class' LENGTH (FT) 1 WIDTH (FT) 1 YD2 1 PCI District 2 STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT 35700 ANDOVER MCARDLE MTVERNON 2 Local 770 25 2,139 74 35800 ANDREWS REYNOSA PRESCOTT 2 Local 870 24 2,320 71 48000 ASHLAND GOLLIHAR COLLINGSWOOD 2 Local 765 24 2,040 77 336700 FIFTEENTH ELIZABETH MC KENZIE 2 Local 860 24 2,293 80 336800 FIFTEENTH MC KENZIE AYERS 2 Local 860 24 2,293 80 634800 MCARDLE ANDOVER HOLMES 2 C-3 290 58 1,869 73 634900 MC ARDLE HOLMES SHOPPING WAY 2 A-1 1,455 58 9,377 73 853600 SEVENTEENTH ELIZABETH MC KENZIE 2 Local 860 24 2,293 77 853700 SEVENTEENTH MC KENZIE ISABEL 2 Local 860 24 2,293 77 853800 SEVENTEENTH ISABEL AYERS 2 Local 80 24 213 77 STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI District 3 STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT 33100 ALVIN DR. CALLAWAY DR. CAMWOOD DR. 3 Local 1,945 24 5,187 73 248400 CREST COLONY LN SYLVAN CREST CREST WILLOW DR 3 Local 985 24 2,627 74 248500 CREST COLONY LN CREST WILLOW DR CREST PEBBLE 3 Local 255 24 680 74 252600 CREST PEBBLE CREST VALLEY CREST COLONY 3 Local 535 24 1,427 73 443000 HORNE RD COLUMBIA THERESA 3 A-2 1,190 52 6,876 75 443100 HORNE RD THERESA ELVIRA 3 A-1 1,355 52 7,829 75 815400 SACKY DR AYERS RICHTER 3 Local 2,610 24 6,960 74 939900 SYLVAN CREST KOSTORYZ CREST COLONY LN 3 Local 180 24 480 76 940000 SYLVAN CREST CREST COLONY LN CREST WILLOW DR 3 Local 850 24 2,267 76 958200 TIGER LN CARRIAGE HITCHING POST 3 C-1 270 37 1,110 81 958300 TIGER LN HITCHING POST BUGGYWHIP 3 C-1 255 37 1,048 81 958400 TIGER LN BUGGYWHIP KOSTORYZ 3 C-1 255 36 1,020 81 STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) 1 YD2 PCI District 4 STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT 230400 COMPASS PARK ROAD 22 COMMODORES 4 Local 1,550 36 6,200 79 230500 COMPASS COMMODORES HEADSAIL 4 Local 500 24 1,333 79 230600 COMPASS HEADSAIL DEAD END N 4 Local 300 24 800 79 266100 DASMARINAS QUARTERDECK CROWN ROYAL DR 4 Local 1,820 36 7,280 71 266200 DASMARINAS CROWN ROYAL DR LANYARD 4 Local 520 36 2,080 71 266300 DASMARINAS LANYARD RUDDER 4 Local 1,205 36 4,820 71 266400 DASMARINAS RUDDER WINDJAMMER 4 Local 240 36 960 71 266600 DASMARINAS WINDJAMMER WHITECAP 4 Local 1,500 36 6,000 71 319400 ENCANTADA GYPSY FINISTERE 4 C-1 290 36 1,160 85 319500 ENCANTADA FINISTERE ESCAPADE 4 C-1 270 36 1,080 85 319600 ENCANTADA ESCAPADE DYNA 4 C-1 270 36 1,080 85 319700 ENCANTADA DYNA CUTTYSARK 4 C-1 270 36 1,080 85 319800 ENCANTADA CUTTYSARK CRUISER 4 C-1 375 36 1,500 85 319900 ENCANTADA CRUISER LINDO 4 C-1 280 36 1,120 85 319904 ENCANTADA LINDO PALMIRA 4 C-1 280 36 1,120 85 320000 ENCANTADA PALMIRA PARK ROAD 22 4 C-1 495 36 1,980 85 519700 LEEWARD DR DEAD END S WINDWARD DR 4 Local 870 26 2,513 79 STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT BY DISTRICT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI District 4 STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT continued 519800 LEEWARD DR WINDWARD DR ROBLA 4 C-1 730 56 4,542 79 519900 LEEWARD DR ROBLA ARUBA 4 C-1 530 56 3,298 79 519904 LEEWARD DR ARUBA STAUGUSTINE 4 C-1 770 56 4,791 79 520000 LEEWARD DR STAUGUSTINE GRANADA 4 C-1 740 56 4,604 79 520100 LEEWARD DR GRANADA STBARTHOLOMEW 4 C-1 510 26 1,473 79 STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI District 5 STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT 1950 ABORIGINE DR GREYSTONE DR CASSOWARY CT 5 Local 270 36 1,080 83 1951 ABORIGINE DR CASSOWARY CT EMU DR 5 Local 270 36 1,080 83 1952 ABORIGINE DR EMU DR GLADSTONE DR 5 Local 275 24 733 83 1953 ABORIGINE DR GLADSTONE DR EUCALYPTUS DR 5 Local 280 24 747 83 206500 CIMARRON BLVD SARATOGA BLVD DUNBARTON OAK 5 A-2 1,240 58 7,991 84 206600 CIMARRON BLVD DUNBARTON OAK BROCKHAMPTON 5 A-2 1,100 58 7,089 84 206700 CIMARRON BLVD BROCKHAMPTON NORTH WASHAM 5 A-1 775 58 4,994 84 206800 CIMARRON BLVD NORTH WASHAM MEGAN 5 A-1 920 58 5,929 84 206802 CIMARRON BLVD MEGAN BRIANNA 5 A-1 250 58 1,611 84 206804 CIMARRON BLVD BRIANNA PENNY 5 A-1 250 58 1,611 84 206806 CIMARRON BLVD PENNY LIPES 5 A-1 690 58 4,447 84 206900 CIMARRON BLVD LIPES BLVD YORK CROSSING 5 A-1 780 58 5,027 84 206901 CIMARRON BLVD YORK CROSSING QUEEN JANE 5 A-1 1,135 58 7,314 84 206902 CIMARRON BLVD QUEEN JANE YORKTOWN BLVD 5 A-1 700 58 4,511 84 DISTRICT 1 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 66400 BANILY HEARN RD DEAD END 1 Local 140 24 373 73 78200 BEE MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN VIEW RED BLUFF 1 Local 390 24 1,040 73 204900 CHURCH ST. HIGHWAY 9 DEAD END N 1 Local 765 18 1,530 71 771000 REDBIRD W CALALLEN DR CORNETT 1 C-1 265 36 1,060 80 771100 REDBIRD W CORNETT AVEC 1 C-1 810 36 3,240 80 771200 REDBIRD W AVEC IH 37 1 C-1 400 36 1,600 80 DISTRICT 2 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 224500 COLLINGSWOOD LANSDOWN GOLLIHAR 2 Local 540 24 1,440 83 660700 NIMITZ EISENHOWER MAC ARTHUR 2 Local 955 24 2,547 83 877000 SIXTEENTH MORGAN PRESCOTT 2 Local 475 24 1,267 71 DISTRICT 3 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 40500 APOLLO KRAM EVANS 3 Local 1,015 32 3,609 71 40600 APOLLO EVANS DEAD END W 3 Local 450 32 1,600 71 363900 GEMINI NAVIGATION CENTAURUS 3 Local 890 24 2,373 77 364000 GEMINI CENTAURUS OMAHA 3 Local 625 24 1,667 77 DISTRICT 4 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 150855 CALGARY DR MANITOULIN ISLA SASKATCHEWAN DR 4 Local 270 24 720 78 150856 CALGARY DR SASKATCHEWAN DR LAS BRISAS ST 4 Local 535 24 1,427 78 150857 CALGARY DR LAS BRISAS ST CALGARY CT 4 Local 515 24 1,373 78 150858 CALGARY DR CALGARY CT NORTH OSO PARKWAY 4 Local 365 24 973 78 156900 CANTERBURY HINMAN EBONWOOD 4 Local 410 24 1,093 73 157000 CANTERBURY EBONWOOD KENTNER 4 Local 385 24 1,027 73 157100 CANTERBURY KENTNER IDLYWOOD 4 Local 255 24 680 73 157200 CANTERBURY IDLYWOOD RIO VISTA 4 Local 350 24 933 73 284000 DODDRIDGE OCEAN DR DENVER 4 A-1 295 48 1,573 78 284100 DODDRIDGE DENVER DENVER 4 A-1 90 48 480 78 284104 DODDRIDGE DENVER ARANSAS 4 A-1 235 48 1,253 78 284200 DODDRIDGE ARANSAS SANTA FE 4 A-1 330 48 1,760 78 STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT BY DISTRICT DISTRICT 5 ALTERNATE STREETS - CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 102850 BODEGA BAY DR NACOGDOCHES DR DEAD END 5 Local 390 24 1,040 83 319350 EMU DR TALDORA ST ABORIGINE ST 5 Local 800 24 2,133 84 366350 GLADSTONE DR ABORIGINE ST SYDNEY ST 5 Local 1,075 24 2,867 84 397450 GREYSTONE DR SLOUGH RD ABORIGINE DR 5 Local 170 56 1,058 83 397451 GREYSTONE DR ABORIGINE DR TALDORA ST 5 Local 790 36 3,160 83 397452 GREYSTONE DR TALDORA ST SYDNEY ST 5 Local 265 36 1,060 81 STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR OVERLAY ALPHABETICAL STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 12300 AIRLINE SARATOGA BLVD SANDRA LN 5 A-1 760 58 4,898 70 12400 AIRLINE SANDRA LN FITZHUGH DR 5 A-1 905 58 5,832 70 12500 AIRLINE FITZHUGH DR KRISTIN DR 5 A-1 240 58 1,547 70 12600 AIRLINE KRISTIN DR HOLLISTER DR 5 A-1 610 58 3,931 70 12700 AIRLINE HOLLISTER DR WOOLDRIDGE RD 5 A-1 430 68 3,249 70 15600 AIRLINE WILMA WILMA 4 A-1 165 56 1,027 63 15604 AIRLINE WILMA JARVIS 4 A-1 160 56 996 63 15700 AIRLINE JARVIS JARVIS 4 A-1 130 56 809 63 15704 AIRLINE JARVIS GAINES 4 A-1 135 56 840 63 15800 AIRLINE GAINES CAMDEN PL 4 A-1 460 48 2,453 63 15900 AIRLINE CAMDEN PL CAMDEN PL 4 A-1 655 48 3,493 63 16000 AIRLINE CAMDEN PL OCEAN DR 4 A-1 530 48 2,827 63 30600 ALICE MC ARDLE LAMONT 2 Local 1,150 24 3,067 59 33050 ALTHEA CT LIPES FICUS 5 Local 165 24 440 66 33051 ALTHEA CT FICUS DE 5 Local 180 24 480 66 34700 AMMER LAKE BISTINEAU DEAD END (E) 5 Local 335 24 893 66 34704 AMMER LAKE BISTINEAU DEAD END (W) 5 Local 170 24 453 66 43000 ARANSAS ST ROSSITER SANTA BARBARA 4 Local 310 28 964 66 43100 ARANSAS ST SANTA BARBARA CALIFORNIA 4 Local 300 28 933 66 43200 ARANSAS ST CALIFORNIA SINCLAIR 4 Local 310 28 964 66 43300 ARANSAS ST SINCLAIR CORDULA 4 Local 455 28 1,416 66 43400 ARANSAS ST CORDULA ROPES 4 Local 455 28 1,416 66 43500 ARANSAS ST ROPES DEAD END E 4 Local 840 27 2,520 66 44600 ARCTIC CIR. QUEBEC DR. DEAD END 4 Local 190 24 507 58 59100 AYERS ST GOLLIHAR VIOLA 2 A-1 420 23 1,073 62 59100 AYERS ST GOLLIHAR VIOLA 3 A-1 420 23 1,073 62 59200 AYERS ST VIOLA SUNNYBROOK 2 A-1 910 23 2,326 62 59200 AYERS ST VIOLA SUNNYBROOK 3 A-1 910 23 2,326 62 59300 AYERS ST SUNNYBROOK MANSHEIM 3 A-1 665 46 3,399 69 59400 AYERS ST MANSHEIM MC ARDLE 3 A-1 655 54 3,930 69 59500 AYERS ST MC ARDLE NEMEC ST 3 A-1 860 80 7,644 69 59600 AYERS ST NEMEC ST SPID (PADRE ISLAND D 3 A-1 370 80 3,289 69 61700 BALDPATE PINTAIL BALDPATE CT 5 Local 305 24 813 58 61800 BALDPATE BALDPATE CT DRAKE 5 Local 285 24 760 58 61900 BALDPATE CT. BALDPATE DEAD END N. 5 Local 195 76 1,647 58 70100 BARTLETT WILSON KREJCI LN 1 Local 230 24 613 56 70200 BARTLETT SAXET N WILSON 1 Local 300 27 900 56 70300 BARTLETT SAXET N SAXET S 1 Local 975 24 2,600 56 74000 BEACH DEAD END E GULF BREEZE 1 C-1 300 24 800 66 74100 BEACH GULF BREEZE SURFSIDE 1 C-1 340 24 907 66 74200 BEACH SURFSIDE TIMON BLVD 1 C-1 165 24 440 66 74300 BEACH TIMON BLVD SEAGULL 1 C-1 225 37 925 66 80000 BELMA AMBER WALDRON RD 4 Local 815 18 1,630 57 84600 BERNICE DELTA EGYPTIAN 4 Local 275 36 1,100 59 84602 BERNICE EGYPTIAN PYRAMID 4 Local 265 36 1,060 59 84604 BERNICE PYRAMID WOODLAWN 4 Local 265 36 1,060 59 84700 BERNICE WOODLAWN ARNOLD 4 Local 265 24 707 59 84800 BERNICE ARNOLD CLARE 4 Local 265 27 795 59 84900 BERNICE CLARE RICKEY 4 Local 275 36 1,100 59 85000 BERNICE RICKEY SUSAN 4 Local 620 24 1,653 59 85100 BERNICE SUSAN BURR 4 Local 445 24 1,187 59 85200 BERNICE BURR MC ARDLE 4 Local 875 24 2,333 59 98700 BLUE GRASS HORSE SHOES FRONTIER 1 Local 845 24 2,253 56 98800 BLUE GRASS FRONTIER OUTPOST DR 1 Local 1,055 24 2,813 56 107400 BOROS NICKLAUS AARON 5 Local 1,135 24 3,027 66 107500 BOROS AARON DEAD END W 5 Local 415 24 1,107 66 108200 BOTSFORD GORDON REID DR 2 Local 450 24 1,200 57 108300 BOULDER CIR. TIMBERLINE DR DEAD END S. 1 Local 210 24 560 57 109300 BRADFORD WEBER RD WEIR 2 Local 660 24 1,760 61 146900 CABRA LAKE LAKE 1 Local 85 24 227 59 146904 CABRA LAKE CHIPITO 1 Local 280 24 747 59 177800 CASA BONITA ORLANDO TEXAN TRAIL 2 Local 600 24 1,600 56 177900 CASA BONITA TEXAN TRAIL CASA LINDA 2 Local 730 24 1,947 56 189800 CENTER DR SHOPPING CENTER DELAINE 4 Local 140 24 373 62 189900 CENTER DR DELAINE JACKSON PLACE 4 Local 240 24 640 62 190000 CENTER DR JACKSON PLACE GRANT 4 Local 280 24 747 62 190100 CENTER DR GRANT CATALINA 4 Local 310 24 827 62 STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR OVERLAY ALPHABETICAL STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 190200 CENTER DR CATALINA PEERMAN 4 Local 310 24 827 62 190300 CENTER DR PEERMAN PASADENA 4 Local 300 24 800 62 190400 CENTER DR PASADENA SANTA MONICA 4 Local 300 24 800 62 190500 CENTER DR SANTA MONICA BERMUDA 4 Local 300 24 800 62 190600 CENTER DR BERMUDA WILLIAMSON 4 Local 305 24 813 62 190700 CENTER DR WILLIAMSON DOLPHIN 4 Local 290 24 773 62 190800 CENTER DR DOLPHIN DOLPHIN 4 Local 90 24 240 62 190802 CENTER DR DOLPHIN BARRACUDA 4 Local 210 24 560 62 190900 CENTER DR BARRACUDA BARRACUDA 4 Local 135 24 360 62 190902 CENTER DR BARRACUDA CORAL 4 Local 155 24 413 62 191000 CENTER DR CORAL MIRAMAR 4 Local 295 24 787 62 191100 CENTER DR MIRAMAR PL CARMEL PARKWAY 4 Local 290 24 773 62 213200 CLEAR FORK DR PRAIRIE CREEK RED RIVER DR 1 Local 980 24 2,613 60 238200 CORNELIA CIRE WESTCHESTER AVONDALE 1 Local 1,570 24 4,187 60 238300 CORNELIA CIRE AVONDALE WESTCHESTER 1 Local 190 24 507 60 238100 CORNELIA CIRW WESTCHESTER WESTCHESTER 1 Local 1,875 24 5,000 60 247200 CRENSHAW WOOD IRON AARON 5 Local 1,490 24 3,973 68 286000 DOGWOOD STARLITE ROCKWOOD 1 Local 1,430 24 3,813 60 299600 EAGLE DR WOOD -IRON AARON DR 5 Local 1,350 24 3,600 65 317200 ELMORE BROOKS MC LEOD 1 Local 320 24 853 67 317300 ELMORE MC LEOD HIGHWAY 9 1 Local 500 24 1,333 67 322300 ERWIN AVE MUELLER COLIMA 1 Local 620 30 2,067 64 322400 ERWIN AVE COLIMA INTERSTATE 37 1 Local 180 30 600 64 358000 FT WORTH CAMPBELL COLLINS 2 Local 265 32 942 62 358100 FT WORTH COLLINS DABNEY 2 Local 255 32 907 62 370100 GLENWOOD STARLITE ROCKWOOD 1 Local 940 24 2,507 59 420700 HEBERT SANDERS ACUSHNET 5 Local 1,400 24 3,733 59 485600 KINGWOOD STARLITE WESTWOOD 1 Local 1,775 24 4,733 56 505500 LAMONT WEIR WEBER RD 2 Local 660 24 1,760 61 512700 LARKSPUR TROJAN DR MANSHEIM 3 Local 665 24 1,773 61 512800 LARKSPUR MANSHEIM GARDEN DR 3 Local 665 24 1,773 61 512900 LARKSPUR GARDEN DR GOLLIHAR 3 Local 1,285 24 3,427 61 614900 MORAVIAN LAMONT MCARDLE 2 Local 1,150 24 3,067 56 675500 OAK PARK AVE UP RIVER RD OAK PARK AVE 1 Local 415 40 1,844 69 675504 OAK PARK AVE OAK PARK AVE MUELLER 1 Local 760 40 3,378 69 675506 OAK PARK AVE UP RIVER RD OAK PARK AVE 1 Local 390 40 1,733 69 675600 OAK PARK AVE MUELLER COLIMA 1 Local 585 40 2,600 69 682600 ODEM NICHOLSON GOLLIHAR 2 Local 1,280 24 3,413 60 690500 ORCHID TROJAN DR MANSHEIM 3 Local 665 24 1,773 56 690600 ORCHID MANSHEIM GARDEN 3 Local 660 24 1,760 56 690700 ORCHID GARDEN GOLLIHAR 3 Local 1,280 24 3,413 56 695600 OSO PARKWAY BEAUVAIS VALTOURMANCHE 5 P-1 600 32 2,133 60 695700 OSO PARKWAY VALTOURMANCHE PIEDRABUENA 5 P-1 410 32 1,458 60 695800 OSO PARKWAY PIEDRABUENA VALDEMORILLO 5 P-1 385 32 1,369 60 695900 OSO PARKWAY VALDEMORILLO CAMPODOLCINO 5 P-1 400 32 1,422 60 696000 OSO PARKWAY CAMPODOLCINO BAR -LE -DOC 5 P-1 1,000 32 3,556 60 696500 OSO PARKWAY MARSEILLE (E) ETIENNE 5 P-1 505 36 2,020 60 696600 OSO PARKWAY ETIENNE LENS DR 5 P-1 170 36 680 60 695500 OSO PKWY (N) STAPLES ST BEAUVAIS 5 P-1 345 32 1,227 60 695510 OSO PKWY (S) STAPLES BEAUVAIS 5 P-1 345 32 1,227 60 750300 PRAIRIE CRK DR CLEAR FORK DR MEDINA SPRINGS 1 Local 620 24 1,653 61 750400 PRAIRIE CRK DR MEDINA SPRINGS RED RIVER DR 1 Local 405 24 1,080 61 759000 PYLE DR WEBER WEIR 2 Local 630 24 1,680 67 817100 SAGEBRUSH OUTPOST ROCKWOOD 1 Local 1,010 24 2,693 66 857800 SHAW HORNE RD YALE 3 Local 270 24 720 67 857900 SHAW YALE SHERMAN 3 Local 290 24 773 67 858000 SHAW SHERMAN HUDSON 3 Local 295 24 787 67 858100 SHAW HUDSON HUDSON 3 Local 95 24 253 67 858200 SHAW HUDSON HARVARD 3 Local 365 24 973 67 858300 SHAW HARVARD HARRIET 3 Local 230 24 613 67 858400 SHAW HARRIET ISLLA 3 Local 240 24 640 67 858500 SHAW ISLLA CASTENON 3 Local 225 24 600 67 875000 SILVERSPUR HORSE SHOE FRONTIER 1 Local 990 24 2,640 63 894200 SPRING ST CUIPER ALEXANDER 2 Local 640 24 1,707 62 894300 SPRING ST ALEXANDER RAMSEY 2 Local 545 24 1,453 62 894400 SPRING ST RAMSEY GOLLIHAR 2 Local 290 24 773 62 995200 VERA CRUZ MORGAN ZAPATA 3 Local 295 24 787 66 STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR OVERLAY ALPHABETICAL STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 995300 VERA CRUZ ZAPATA GLORIA 3 Local 240 24 640 66 995400 VERA CRUZ GLORIA ZARAGOSA 3 Local 240 24 640 66 998700 VICTORIA PARK WOOLDRIDGE QUEBEC 4 C-1 1,460 24 3,893 69 1009900 WALDRON RD CARIBBEAN BAYBERRY N 4 A-1 845 24 2,253 57 1010000 WALDRON RD BAYBERRY N BAYBERRY S 4 A-1 320 24 853 57 1010100 WALDRON RD BAYBERRY S MEDITERRANEAN 4 A-1 585 24 1,560 57 1010102 WALDRON RD MEDITERRANEAN YORKTOWN 4 A-1 3,550 24 9,467 57 1046800 WIND ROCK HORSE SHOE FRONTIER 1 Local 1,060 24 2,827 69 STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT ALPHABETICAL STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 1950 ABORIGINE DR GREYSTONE DR CASSOWARY CT 5 Local 270 36 1,080 83 1951 ABORIGINE DR CASSOWARY CT EMU DR 5 Local 270 36 1,080 83 1952 ABORIGINE DR EMU DR GLADSTONE DR 5 Local 275 24 733 83 1953 ABORIGINE DR GLADSTONE DR EUCALYPTUS DR 5 Local 280 24 747 83 33100 ALVIN DR. CALLAWAY DR. CAMWOOD DR. 3 Local 1,945 24 5,187 73 35700 ANDOVER MCARDLE MTVERNON 2 Local 770 25 2,139 74 35800 ANDREWS REYNOSA PRESCOTT 2 Local 870 24 2,320 71 40500 APOLLO KRAM EVANS 3 Local 1,015 32 3,609 71 40600 APOLLO EVANS DEAD END W 3 Local 450 32 1,600 71 48000 ASHLAND GOLLIHAR COLLINGSWOOD 2 Local 765 24 2,040 77 62000 BALDWIN LEOPARD HWY9 CANTWELL 1 A-1 1,230 58 7,927 75 62100 BALDWIN CANTWELL OMAHA ST 1 A-1 760 58 4,898 75 62200 BALDWIN OMAHA ST WESTCHESTER 1 A-1 715 58 4,608 75 62300 BALDWIN WESTCHESTER VILLA 1 A-1 1,185 58 7,637 75 62400 BALDWIN VILLA RUSSELL 1 A-1 1,010 58 6,509 75 62500 BALDWIN RUSSELL AGNES HWY44 1 A-1 875 58 5,639 75 66400 BANILY HEARN RD DEAD END 1 Local 140 24 373 73 78200 BEE MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN VIEW RED BLUFF 1 Local 390 24 1,040 73 102850 BODEGA BAY DR NACOGDOCHES DR DEAD END 5 Local 390 24 1,040 83 149400 CALALLEN DR REDBIRD SMITH RD 1 C-1 715 38 3,019 73 149500 CALALLEN DR SMITH RD TEAGUE 1 C-1 1,555 38 6,566 73 150855 CALGARY DR MANITOULIN ISLA SASKATCHEWAN DR 4 Local 270 24 720 78 150856 CALGARY DR SASKATCHEWAN DR LAS BRISAS ST 4 Local 535 24 1,427 78 150857 CALGARY DR LAS BRISAS ST CALGARY CT 4 Local 515 24 1,373 78 150858 CALGARY DR CALGARY CT NORTH OSO PARKWAY 4 Local 365 24 973 78 156900 CANTERBURY HINMAN EBONWOOD 4 Local 410 24 1,093 73 157000 CANTERBURY EBONWOOD KENTNER 4 Local 385 24 1,027 73 157100 CANTERBURY KENTNER IDLYWOOD 4 Local 255 24 680 73 157200 CANTERBURY IDLYWOOD RIO VISTA 4 Local 350 24 933 73 199800 CHEYENNE AGNES LOU 1 C-1 620 24 1,653 81 199900 CHEYENNE LOU HURON 1 C-1 640 24 1,707 81 200000 CHEYENNE HURON CHIPPEWA 1 C-1 640 24 1,707 81 200100 CHEYENNE CHIPPEWA NAVAJO 1 C-1 640 24 1,707 81 200200 CHEYENNE NAVAJO BALDWIN 1 C-1 390 24 1,040 81 204900 CHURCH ST. HIGHWAY 9 DEAD END N 1 Local 765 18 1,530 71 206500 CIMARRON BLVD SARATOGA BLVD DUNBARTON OAK 5 A-2 1,240 58 7,991 84 206600 CIMARRON BLVD DUNBARTON OAK BROCKHAMPTON 5 A-2 1,100 58 7,089 84 206700 CIMARRON BLVD BROCKHAMPTON NORTH WASHAM 5 A-1 775 58 4,994 84 206800 CIMARRON BLVD NORTH WASHAM MEGAN 5 A-1 920 58 5,929 84 206802 CIMARRON BLVD MEGAN BRIANNA 5 A-1 250 58 1,611 84 206804 CIMARRON BLVD BRIANNA PENNY 5 A-1 250 58 1,611 84 206806 CIMARRON BLVD PENNY LIPES 5 A-1 690 58 4,447 84 206900 CIMARRON BLVD LIPES BLVD YORK CROSSING 5 A-1 780 58 5,027 84 206901 CIMARRON BLVD YORK CROSSING QUEEN JANE 5 A-1 1,135 58 7,314 84 206902 CIMARRON BLVD QUEEN JANE YORKTOWN BLVD 5 A-1 700 58 4,511 84 224500 COLLINGSWOOD LANSDOWN GOLLIHAR 2 Local 540 24 1,440 83 230400 COMPASS PARK ROAD 22 COMMODORES 4 Local 1,550 36 6,200 79 230500 COMPASS COMMODORES HEADSAIL 4 Local 500 24 1,333 79 230600 COMPASS HEADSAIL DEAD END N 4 Local 300 24 800 79 248400 CREST COLONY LN SYLVAN CREST CREST WILLOW DR 3 Local 985 24 2,627 74 248500 CREST COLONY LN CREST WILLOW DR CREST PEBBLE 3 Local 255 24 680 74 252600 CREST PEBBLE CREST VALLEY CREST COLONY 3 Local 535 24 1,427 73 266100 DASMARINAS QUARTERDECK CROWN ROYAL DR 4 Local 1,820 36 7,280 71 266200 DASMARINAS CROWN ROYAL DR LANYARD 4 Local 520 36 2,080 71 266300 DASMARINAS LANYARD RUDDER 4 Local 1,205 36 4,820 71 266400 DASMARINAS RUDDER WINDJAMMER 4 Local 240 36 960 71 266600 DASMARINAS WINDJAMMER WHITECAP 4 Local 1,500 36 6,000 71 284000 DODDRIDGE OCEAN DR DENVER 4 A-1 295 48 1,573 78 284100 DODDRIDGE DENVER DENVER 4 A-1 90 48 480 78 284104 DODDRIDGE DENVER ARANSAS 4 A-1 235 48 1,253 78 284200 DODDRIDGE ARANSAS SANTA FE 4 A-1 330 48 1,760 78 319350 EMU DR TALDORA ST ABORIGINE ST 5 Local 800 24 2,133 84 319400 ENCANTADA GYPSY FINISTERE 4 C-1 290 36 1,160 85 319500 ENCANTADA FINISTERE ESCAPADE 4 C-1 270 36 1,080 85 319600 ENCANTADA ESCAPADE DYNA 4 C-1 270 36 1,080 85 319700 ENCANTADA DYNA CUTTYSARK 4 C-1 270 36 1,080 85 319800 ENCANTADA CUTTYSARK CRUISER 4 C-1 375 36 1,500 85 STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORKPLAN CONTRACTOR SEALCOAT ALPHABETICAL STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 319900 ENCANTADA CRUISER LINDO 4 C-1 280 36 1,120 85 319904 ENCANTADA LINDO PALMIRA 4 C-1 280 36 1,120 85 320000 ENCANTADA PALMIRA PARK ROAD 22 4 C-1 495 36 1,980 85 336700 FIFTEENTH ELIZABETH MC KENZIE 2 Local 860 24 2,293 80 336800 FIFTEENTH MC KENZIE AYERS 2 Local 860 24 2,293 80 363900 GEMINI NAVIGATION CENTAURUS 3 Local 890 24 2,373 77 364000 GEMINI CENTAURUS OMAHA 3 Local 625 24 1,667 77 366350 GLADSTONE DR ABORIGINE ST SYDNEY ST 5 Local 1,075 24 2,867 84 397450 GREYSTONE DR SLOUGH RD ABORIGINE DR 5 Local 170 56 1,058 83 397451 GREYSTONE DR ABORIGINE DR TALDORA ST 5 Local 790 36 3,160 83 397452 GREYSTONE DR TALDORA ST SYDNEY ST 5 Local 265 36 1,060 81 443000 HORNE RD COLUMBIA THERESA 3 A-2 1,190 52 6,876 75 443100 HORNE RD THERESA ELVIRA 3 A-1 1,355 52 7,829 75 519700 LEEWARD DR DEAD END S WINDWARD DR 4 Local 870 26 2,513 79 519800 LEEWARD DR WINDWARD DR ROBLA 4 C-1 730 56 4,542 79 519900 LEEWARD DR ROBLA ARUBA 4 C-1 530 56 3,298 79 519904 LEEWARD DR ARUBA STAUGUSTINE 4 C-1 770 56 4,791 79 520000 LEEWARD DR STAUGUSTINE GRANADA 4 C-1 740 56 4,604 79 520100 LEEWARD DR GRANADA STBARTHOLOMEW 4 C-1 510 26 1,473 79 634800 MCARDLE ANDOVER HOLMES 2 C-3 290 58 1,869 73 634900 MCARDLE HOLMES SHOPPING WAY 2 A-1 1,455 58 9,377 73 660700 NIMITZ EISENHOWER MAC ARTHUR 2 Local 955 24 2,547 83 771000 REDBIRD W CALALLEN DR CORNETT 1 C-1 265 36 1,060 80 771100 REDBIRD W CORNETT AVEC 1 C-1 810 36 3,240 80 771200 REDBIRD W AVEC IH 37 1 C-1 400 36 1,600 80 815400 SACKY DR AYERS RICHTER 3 Local 2,610 24 6,960 74 853600 SEVENTEENTH ELIZABETH MC KENZIE 2 Local 860 24 2,293 77 853700 SEVENTEENTH MC KENZIE ISABEL 2 Local 860 24 2,293 77 853800 SEVENTEENTH ISABEL AYERS 2 Local 80 24 213 77 859300 SHAWNEE ST CHIPPEWA ST PINE ST 1 Local 770 24 2,053 79 859400 SHAWNEE ST PINE ST LOU ST 1 Local 505 24 1,347 79 877000 SIXTEENTH MORGAN PRESCOTT 2 Local 475 24 1,267 71 939900 SYLVAN CREST KOSTORYZ CREST COLONY LN 3 Local 180 24 480 76 940000 SYLVAN CREST CREST COLONY LN CREST WILLOW DR 3 Local 850 24 2,267 76 958200 TIGER LN CARRIAGE HITCHING POST 3 C-1 270 37 1,110 81 958300 TIGER LN HITCHING POST BUGGYWHIP 3 C-1 255 37 1,048 81 958400 TIGER LN BUGGYWHIP KOSTORYZ 3 C-1 255 36 1,020 81 STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORK PLAN CITY SEALCOAT BY DISTRICT STR ID 1 STREET FROM TO District Class' LENGTH (FT)1 WIDTH (FT) 1 YDZ 1 PCI District 1 STREETS - CITY SEALCOAT 11400 AHERN ST. BLUNTZER PARR 1 Local 320 24 853 73 37700 ANNAVILLE RD VIOLET RD LEONARD ST 1 Local 1,510 24 4,027 86 37800 ANNAVILLE RD LEONARD ST PRIVATE ST 1 Local 375 24 1,000 86 37805 ANNAVILLE RD PRIVATE ST STARLITE LN 1 Local 655 24 1,747 86 52500 AUTHER ELK VILLAGE 1 Local 765 18 1,530 72 52600 AUTHER VILLAGE DEER 1 Local 720 18 1,440 72 59700 AZALEA BUDDY LAWRENCE ANTELOPE 1 Local 470 24 1,253 80 59800 AZALEA ANTELOPE MIMOSA 1 Local 370 24 987 80 72800 BAYMOOR BUDDY LAWRENCE MAGNOLIA 1 Local 330 24 880 71 72900 BAYMOOR MAGNOLIA INTERSTATE 37 1 Local 190 24 507 71 75101 BEAL DR TEAL THOREAU 1 Local 320 24 853 75 75102 BEAL DR THOREAU WOOD RIVER 1 Local 305 24 813 75 75103 BEAL DR WOOD RIVER SANTA GERTRUDIS 1 Local 580 24 1,547 75 101200 BLUNTZER DEAD END (N) AHERN ST 1 Local 930 20 2,067 75 101300 BLUNTZER AHERN ST R R TRACKS 1 Local 210 20 467 75 101400 BLUNTZER R R TRACKS AGNES (HWY44) 1 Local 305 20 678 75 118051 BRENDEL LN VIOLET RD CLIFF CRENSHAW RD 1 Local 1120 24 2,987 81 145500 BUTLER ST VIOLET RD CLIFF CRENSHAW 1 Local 1,115 21 2,602 73 244600 COVVHOUSE CREEK RED RIVER DEAD END N 1 Local 500 24 1,333 72 291500 DOUGLAS TAWAKONI CHEROKEE 1 Local 635 24 1,693 73 293700 DRISCOLL DR NAYLOR N AGNES 1 Local 885 34 3,343 75 573000 MARGUERITE BLUNTZER PORT AVE 1 Local 640 24 1,707 77 573100 MARGUERITE PORT AVE HARMON 1 Local 155 24 413 77 573200 MARGUERITE HARMON DUNCAN 1 Local 940 24 2,507 77 577800 MARY ALAMEDA N TENTH 1 Local 325 34 1,228 81 577900 MARY TENTH TENTH 1 Local 145 34 548 81 578000 MARY TENTH ELEVENTH 1 Local 210 34 793 81 578004 MARY ELEVENTH TWELFTH 1 Local 250 34 944 81 578100 MARY TWELFTH BROWNLEE 1 Local 455 34 1,719 81 578200 MARY BROWNLEE FOURTEENTH 1 Local 325 34 1,228 81 578300 MARY FOURTEENTH CROSSTOWN EXPWY 1 Local 480 34 1,813 81 622050 MOTTS DR SESSIONS RD MESQUITE RIDGE DR 1 Local 150 24 400 71 622055 MOTTS DR MESQUITE RIDGE DR GRANITE PEAK DR 1 Local 525 24 1,400 71 694500 OSAGE HURON LOU 1 Local 685 24 1,827 84 694600 OSAGE LOU AGNES 1 Local 640 24 1,707 84 834303 SANTA GERTRUDIS DR BEAL DR BEAL DR 1 Local 2,030 24 5,413 76 980700 UP RIVER RD PALM DR WESTGATE 1 C-1 1,960 37 8,058 76 980900 UP RIVER RD WESTGATE LONGVIEW 1 C-1 435 37 1,788 76 981000 UP RIVER RD LONGVIEW NUECES BAY 1 C-1 190 37 781 76 981004 UP RIVER RD NUECES BAY FAIRVIEW 1 C-1 165 37 678 76 STR ID 1 STREET FROM TO District Class' LENGTH (FT)1 WIDTH (FT) 1 YDZ 1 PCI District 2 STREETS - CITY SEALCOAT 241000 COSNER MC ARDLE FOLEY 2 Local 1,060 24 2,827 79 241100 COSNER FOLEY MAHAN 2 Local 1,270 24 3,387 79 1074100 DEL MAR N -SR OCEAN DR SECOND 2 L-A 205 14 319 71 1074200 DEL MAR N -SR SECOND THIRD 2 L-A 210 14 327 71 1074250 DEL MAR N -SR THIRD SANTA FE 2 L-A 195 14 303 71 1074300 DEL MAR N -SR SANTA FE LAWNVIEW 2 L-A 530 12 707 71 1074400 DEL MAR N -SR LAWNVIEW ALAMEDA 2 L-A 805 12 1,073 71 1074500 DEL MAR N -SR ALAMEDA BROWNLEE 2 L-A 575 14 894 71 1074600 DEL MAR N -SR BROWNLEE STAPLES 2 L-A 400 14 622 71 1074700 DEL MAR S -SR STAPLES BROWNLEE 2 L-A 520 14 809 71 1074800 DEL MAR S -SR BROWNLEE ALAMEDA 2 L-A 585 14 910 71 1074900 DEL MAR S -SR ALAMEDA LAWNVIEW 2 L-A 810 14 1,260 71 1075000 DEL MAR S -SR LAWNVIEW SANTA FE 2 L-A 540 14 840 71 1075100 DEL MAR S -SR SANTA FE THIRD 2 L-A 205 14 319 71 1075200 DEL MAR S -SR THIRD OCEAN 2 L-A 495 14 770 71 283000 DIXIE ELGIN CARVER 2 Local 740 24 1,973 73 283100 DIXIE CARVER WASHINGTON 2 Local 400 24 1,067 73 295000 DUNBAR GREENWOOD ELGIN 2 Local 340 24 907 83 295100 DUNBAR ELGIN SABINAS 2 Local 330 24 880 83 295200 DUNBAR SABINAS CARVER 2 Local 330 24 880 83 295300 DUNBAR CARVER WASHINGTON 2 Local 240 24 640 83 611400 MONTGOMERY MAC ARTHUR EISENHOWER 2 Local 955 24 2,547 77 STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORK PLAN CITY SEALCOAT BY DISTRICT STR ID 1 STREET FROM TO District Class' LENGTH (FT)1 WIDTH (FT) 1 YDZ 1 PCI District 2 STREETS - CITY SEALCOAT - continued 629100 MUSTANG TRAIL STAPLES S GOLLIHAR 2 C-1 1,360 36 5,440 75 664700 NOGALES EISENHOWER MAC ARTHUR 2 Local 950 24 2,533 75 1013400 WASHINGTON DUNBAR TARLTON 2 Local 655 24 1,747 83 STR ID 1 STREET FROM TO District Class' LENGTH (FT)1 WIDTH (FT) 1 YDZ 1 PCI District 3 STREETS - CITY SEALCOAT 67300 BARCELONA COLUMBIA PKWY GREENWOOD 3 Local 1,125 24 3,000 71 100200 BLUE WATER WHITE BIRD ALLEY 3 Local 130 24 347 83 100300 BLUE WATER ALLEY SOUTHERN SUN 3 Local 130 24 347 83 100400 BLUE WATER SOUTHERN SUN ALLEY 3 Local 130 24 347 83 100500 BLUE WATER ALLEY ELDERBERRY 3 Local 130 24 347 83 106400 BONNER WEDGEWOOD LN FLYNN PKWY 3 C-1 650 36 2,600 85 216700 CLIFF MAUS BEAR LANE OLD BROWNSVILLE 3 C-1 1,650 36 6,600 84 216800 CLIFF MAUS OLD BROWNSVILLE ROCKFORD 3 C-1 1,085 36 4,340 84 216900 CLIFF MAUS ROCKFORD CULVER 3 C-1 1,090 36 4,360 84 217000 CLIFF MAUS CULVER PADRE ISLAND DR 3 C-1 975 36 3,900 84 300800 EASTER DRE MANSHEIM FRANKLIN 3 Local 640 24 1,707 75 300900 EASTER DR W FRANKLIN MANSHEIM 3 Local 660 24 1,760 75 345800 FLYNN PKWY HOLLY RD HAVERHILL 3 P-1 180 36 720 75 345900 FLYNN PKWY HAVERHILL COBBLESTONE 3 P-1 310 36 1,240 75 346000 FLYNN PKWY COBBLESTONE COVENTRY 3 P-1 305 36 1,220 75 346100 FLYNN PKWY COVENTRY SUTTON 3 P-1 270 36 1,080 75 346200 FLYNN PKWY SUTTON BONNER 3 P-1 275 36 1,100 75 352300 FRANKLIN E MANSHEIM EASTER 3 Local 650 24 1,733 71 352400 FRANKLIN W EASTER MANSHEIM 3 Local 650 24 1,733 71 410800 HARRIETT GREENWOOD SHAW 3 Local 900 24 2,400 71 1028400 WHARTON ST SANTA ANA ST SOKOL ST 3 Local 890 24 2,373 71 STR ID 1 STREET FROM TO District Class' LENGTH (FT) 1 WIDTH (FT) 1 YDZ 1 PCI District 4 STREETS - CITY SEALCOAT 32100 ALMERIAAVE ENCANTADAAVE LINDO DR 4 Local 990 24 2,640 76 32200 ALMERIAAVE LINDO DR PALMIRAAVE 4 Local 275 24 733 76 42604 AQUARIUS JOLLY ROGER FLINTLOCK 4 C-1 495 36 1,980 78 42700 AQUARIUS FLINTLOCK LONG BOAT 4 C-1 295 36 1,180 78 42800 AQUARIUS LONG BOAT LAFFITE 4 C-1 300 36 1,200 78 42900 AQUARIUS LAFFITE WHITE CAP BLVD. 4 C-1 285 36 1,140 78 72400 BAYLARK SEA LANE HARBOR LIGHTS 4 Local 335 24 893 74 72500 BAYLARK HARBOR LIGHTS PAUL JONES 4 Local 125 24 333 74 72600 BAYLARK PAUL JONES HARBOR VILLAGE 4 Local 150 24 400 74 104500 BONASSE WHITE CAP BLVD DEAD END S 4 Local 870 24 2,320 72 155800 CANADIAN DR VANCOUVER DR ERIE DR 4 Local 250 36 1,000 71 155900 CANADIAN DR ERIE DR PARKGREEN 4 Local 260 21 607 71 156000 CANADIAN DR PARKGREEN WEST MOUNT DR 4 Local 215 36 860 71 156100 CANADIAN DR WEST MOUNT DR OSO PARKWAY 4 Local 275 36 1,100 71 201250 CHINA BEACH DR LA CONCHA BLVD WELKIN COVE 4 Local 170 24 453 79 201251 CHINA BEACH DR WELKIN COVE DEAD END 4 Local 345 24 920 79 430200 HIGHLAND MIST CROWN ROYAL DR CROWN ROYAL DR 4 Local 1,550 24 4,133 72 496604 LAGUNA SHORE CARIBBEAN TROPIC BRIDGE 4 P-1 1,250 35 4,861 80 496704 LAGUNA SHORE TROPIC BRIDGE MEDITERRANEAN 4 P-1 1,255 35 4,881 80 509700 LANYARD AQUARIUS QUARTERDECK 4 Local 290 24 773 80 509800 LANYARD QUARTERDECK LIGHTHOUSE 4 Local 320 24 853 80 509900 LANYARD LIGHTHOUSE TOPGALLANT 4 Local 335 24 893 80 510000 LANYARD TOPGALLANT DAS MARINAS 4 Local 265 24 707 80 691200 ORIOLE LOVE BIRD DEAD END 4 Local 115 10 128 74 757600 PURDUE RD WALDRON RD SCHOOL CIR 4 C-1 340 44 1,662 73 757700 PURDUE RD SCHOOL CIR LOMBARDY 4 C-1 135 44 660 73 757800 PURDUE RD LOMBARDY GREER 4 C-1 790 36 3,160 73 757900 PURDUE RD GREER OLLIE 4 C-1 280 36 1,120 73 758000 PURDUE RD OLLIE WINDMERE 4 C-1 250 36 1,000 73 758100 PURDUE RD WINDMERE LUZUIS 4 C-1 1,005 36 4,020 73 758200 PURDUE RD LUZIUS HANDLIN 4 C-1 330 36 1,320 73 758300 PURDUE RD HANDLIN RETTA 4 C-1 330 36 1,320 73 758400 PURDUE RD RETTA SENTINEL 4 C-1 645 36 2,580 73 758500 PURDUE RD SENTINEL VIALOUX 4 C-1 370 36 1,480 73 STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORK PLAN CITY SEALCOAT BY DISTRICT STR ID 1 STREET FROM TO District Class' LENGTH (FT)1 WIDTH (FT) 1 YDZ 1 PCI District 4 STREETS - CITY SEALCOAT - continued 758600 PURDUE RD VIALOUX WOODCREST 4 C-1 140 36 560 73 758700 PURDUE RD WOODCREST FLOUR BLUFF DR 4 C-1 650 44 3,178 73 761600 QUEBEC DR VICTORIA PARK EDMONTON 4 Local 315 24 840 72 761610 QUEBEC DR EDMONTON CALGARY 4 Local 160 24 427 72 761620 QUEBEC DR CALGARY OSO PKWY 4 Local 1,020 24 2,720 72 823700 SAND PIPER DRN SAND PIPER DRE SAND PIPER CIR 4 Local 1,060 24 2,827 71 1025100 WEST MOUNT DR CANADIAN DR PARKGREEN 4 Local 710 24 1,893 71 STR ID 1 STREET FROM TO District Class' LENGTH (FT)1 WIDTH (FT) 1 YDZ 1 PCI District 5 STREETS - CITY SEALCOAT 71150 BAUER DR CIMARRON LOOMIS 5 Local 175 24 467 76 71151 BAUER DR LOOMIS REDDINGTON 5 Local 770 24 2,053 76 71152 BAUER DR REDDINGTON DEAD END (E) 5 Local 170 24 453 76 128500 BROCKHAMPTON ST CIMARRON ROAD BOLLINGER 5 C-1 170 36 680 80 128600 BROCKHAMPTON ST BOLLINGER AUDN DR 5 C-1 405 36 1,620 80 128700 BROCKHAMPTON ST AUDN DR NEW BEDFORD 5 C-1 475 36 1,900 80 186500 CEDAR PASS DR ASPEN GROVE TRAPPER'S LAKE 5 C-1 140 36 560 80 186600 CEDAR PASS DR TRAPPER'S LAKE FTCOLLIN DR 5 C-1 230 36 920 80 186700 CEDAR PASS DR FTCOLLIN DR CARBONDALE 5 C-1 235 36 940 80 186800 CEDAR PASS DR CARBONDALE TAOS DR 5 C-1 240 36 960 80 186900 CEDAR PASS DR TAOS DR GOLD RIDGE DR 5 C-1 380 36 1,520 80 187000 CEDAR PASS DR GOLD RIDGE DR RUGGED RIDGE 5 C-1 270 36 1,080 80 187100 CEDAR PASS DR RUGGED RIDGE CANDY RID SR 5 C-1 135 36 540 80 187200 CEDAR PASS DR CANDY RID SR CANDY RIDGE 5 C-1 135 36 540 80 187300 CEDAR PASS DR CANDY RIDGE PEPPER RID SR 5 C-1 135 36 540 80 187400 CEDAR PASS DR PEPPER RID SR PEPPER RIDGE 5 C-1 135 36 540 80 187500 CEDAR PASS DR PEPPER RIDGE SUGAR RID SR 5 C-1 135 36 540 80 187600 CEDAR PASS DR SUGAR RID SR SUGAR RIDGE 5 C-1 135 36 540 80 187700 CEDAR PASS DR SUGAR RIDGE DIAMOND RID SR 5 C-1 135 36 540 80 187800 CEDAR PASS DR DIAMOND RID SR EVERHART 5 C-1 320 36 1,280 80 238400 CORNELL DR BROCKHAMPTON GEORGIA 5 Local 765 24 2,040 80 238500 CORNELL DR GEORGIA LIPES 5 Local 645 24 1,720 80 267450 DAWSON CT LENS DR DEAD END 5 Local 370 24 987 81 335610 FENWICK DR LOOMIS HAWK 5 Local 280 24 747 78 335611 FENWICK DR HAWK REDDINGTON 5 Local 490 24 1,307 78 335612 FENWICK DR REDDINGTON DEAD END (E) 5 Local 160 24 427 78 402450 HAILEY CT LENS DR DEAD END 5 Local 350 24 933 76 520500 LEMANS STRASBOURG TARAFAYA 5 Local 320 24 853 84 520600 LEMANS TARAFAYA OUTREAU 5 Local 750 24 2,000 84 520700 LEMANS OUTREAU MARISSA 5 Local 310 24 827 84 520800 LEMANS MARISSA LOVAIN 5 Local 380 24 1,013 84 521510 LENS DR CIMARRON BLVD HAILEY CT 5 Local 145 24 387 79 521520 LENS DR HAILEY CT DAWSON CT 5 Local 270 24 720 79 521530 LENS DR DAWSON CT LANDO CT 5 Local 270 24 720 79 521540 LENS DR LANDO CT SALSA DR 5 Local 275 24 733 79 521550 LENS DR SALSA DR SERENITY CIR 5 Local 280 24 747 79 521560 LENS DR SERENITY CIR POCONO CIR 5 Local 285 24 760 79 521570 LENS DR POCONO CIR BARRIER (E) 5 Local 140 24 373 79 545223 LIPES BLVD SALLY LN KITTY LN 5 C-3 270 44 1,320 78 545230 LIPES BLVD BROCKHAMPTON ST JULIA LN (CIR) 5 C-3 315 44 1,540 78 545233 LIPES BLVD JULIA LN (CIR) ANDREA LN 5 C-3 275 44 1,344 78 545236 LIPES BLVD ANDREA LN CIMMARRON 5 C-3 730 44 3,569 78 563625 MACARENA DR PICANTE DR SALSA DR 5 Local 1,040 24 2,773 72 600050 MIDWEST CIR SAMBA DR DEAD END 5 Local 370 24 987 81 602450 MIMA CIR SAMBA DR DEAD END 5 Local 365 24 973 84 738650 POCONO CIR LENS DR DEAD END 5 Local 360 24 960 71 763750 RADIAL CT SAMBA DR DEAD END 5 Local 360 24 960 85 771951 REDDINGTON BAUER DEAD END 5 Local 135 24 360 70 818176 SALSA DR LENS DR PICANTE DR 5 Local 630 36 2,520 74 818177 SALSA DR PICANTE DR MACARENA DR 5 Local 270 36 1,080 74 818450 SAMBA DR CIMARRON BLVD MIMA CIR 5 Local 150 36 600 83 818455 SAMBA DR MIMA CIR TANGO CIR 5 Local 275 36 1,100 83 818460 SAMBA DR TANGO CIR MIDWEST CIR 5 Local 270 36 1,080 83 818465 SAMBA DR MIDWEST CIR SALSA DR 5 Local 275 36 1,100 83 STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORK PLAN CITY SEALCOAT BY DISTRICT STR ID 1 STREET FROM TO District Class' LENGTH (FT) I WIDTH (FT) 1 YDZ 1 PCI District 5 STREETS - CITY SEALCOAT - continued 818470 SAMBA DR SALSA DR AZIMUTH CT 5 Local 280 24 747 83 818475 SAMBA DR AZIMUTH CT RADIAL CT 5 Local 290 24 773 83 818480 SAMBA DR RADIAL CT BARRIER (E) 5 Local 140 24 373 83 852850 SERENITY CIR LENS DR DEAD END 5 Local 365 24 973 80 District 1 ALTERNATE STREETS - CITY SEALCOAT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YDZ PCI 196200 CHARLES DR HWY 9 (LEOPARD) HARRINGTON DR 1 C-1 645 24 1,720 77 196204 CHARLES DR HARRINGTON DR MAPLE LEAF DR 1 C-1 465 24 1,240 77 196300 CHARLES DR MAPLE LEAF DR TURNING LEAF DR 1 C-1 300 24 800 77 196305 CHARLES DR TURNING LEAF DR STONEWALL BLVD 1 C-1 185 24 493 77 291700 DOVER LIBERTY DEAD END S. 1 Local 295 26 852 71 417200 HAYES DEAD END E. GULFBREEZE 1 Local 295 19 623 79 417300 HAYES GULFBREEZE SURFSIDE 1 Local 340 20 756 79 439400 HONEY TRAIL RED BLUFF MOUNTAIN VIEW 1 Local 380 24 1,013 72 District 2 ALTERNATE STREETS - CITY SEALCOAT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YDZ PCI 397900 GUADALUPE CARVER ELGIN 2 Local 740 24 1,973 76 826300 SAN JACINTO PORT AVE LAMAR 2 Local 855 24 2,280 78 District 3 ALTERNATE STREETS - CITY SEALCOAT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YDZ PCI 267456 DAYS END DR GREENWOOD DR BAY MOON CT 3 Local 745 24 1,987 73 267457 DAYS END DR BAY MOON CT BARRICADE (W) 3 Local 195 24 520 73 995100 VERA CRUZ BALDWIN NAVAJO 3 Local 840 24 2,240 84 District 4 ALTERNATE STREETS - CITY SEALCOAT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 159300 CAPE FEAR CAPE ARON CAPE MAY 4 Local 435 26 1,257 78 159400 CAPE FEAR CAPE MAY CAPE COD 4 Local 340 26 982 78 463575 JEREMIAH CT SETH ST DEAD END (N) 4 local 380 24 1,013 72 464400 JESTER FLOUR BLUFF DR MC DONALD 4 Local 275 26 794 72 464500 JESTER DEAD END (W) MILITARY 4 Local 1,495 22 3,654 72 464600 JESTER MILITARY AVIATION 4 Local 320 20 711 72 464800 JESTER ANCHOR NAS DR 4 Local 365 22 892 72 District 5 ALTERNATE STREETS - CITY SEALCOAT STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YDZ PCI 128800 BROCKHAMPTON ST NEW BEDFORD DONINGTON 5 C-1 290 36 1,160 80 128900 BROCKHAMPTON ST DONINGTON WATERFORD PASS 5 C-1 420 36 1,680 80 129000 BROCKHAMPTON ST WATERFORD PASS STONE HENGE ST 5 C-1 365 36 1,460 80 129100 BROCKHAMPTON ST STONE HENGE ST LIVERPOOL LN 5 C-1 385 36 1,540 80 STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORK PLAN CITY SEALCOAT ALPHABETICAL STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 11400 AHERN ST. BLUNTZER PARR 1 Local 320 24 853 73 32100 ALMERIAAVE ENCANTADAAVE LINDO DR 4 Local 990 24 2,640 76 32200 ALMERIAAVE LINDO DR PALMIRAAVE 4 Local 275 24 733 76 37700 ANNAVILLE RD VIOLET RD LEONARD ST 1 Local 1,510 24 4,027 86 37800 ANNAVILLE RD LEONARD ST PRIVATE ST 1 Local 375 24 1,000 86 37805 ANNAVILLE RD PRIVATE ST STARLITE LN 1 Local 655 24 1,747 86 42604 AQUARIUS JOLLY ROGER FLINTLOCK 4 C-1 495 36 1,980 78 42700 AQUARIUS FLINTLOCK LONG BOAT 4 C-1 295 36 1,180 78 42800 AQUARIUS LONG BOAT LAFFITE 4 C-1 300 36 1,200 78 42900 AQUARIUS LAFFITE WHITE CAP BLVD. 4 C-1 285 36 1,140 78 52500 AUTHER ELK VILLAGE 1 Local 765 18 1,530 72 52600 AUTHER VILLAGE DEER 1 Local 720 18 1,440 72 59700 AZALEA BUDDY LAWRENCE ANTELOPE 1 Local 470 24 1,253 80 59800 AZALEA ANTELOPE MIMOSA 1 Local 370 24 987 80 67300 BARCELONA COLUMBIA PKWY GREENWOOD 3 Local 1,125 24 3,000 71 71150 BAUER DR CIMARRON LOOMIS 5 Local 175 24 467 76 71151 BAUER DR LOOMIS REDDINGTON 5 Local 770 24 2,053 76 71152 BAUER DR REDDINGTON DEAD END (E) 5 Local 170 24 453 76 72400 BAYLARK SEA LANE HARBOR LIGHTS 4 Local 335 24 893 74 72500 BAYLARK HARBOR LIGHTS PAUL JONES 4 Local 125 24 333 74 72600 BAYLARK PAUL JONES HARBOR VILLAGE 4 Local 150 24 400 74 72800 BAYMOOR BUDDY LAWRENCE MAGNOLIA 1 Local 330 24 880 71 72900 BAYMOOR MAGNOLIA INTERSTATE 37 1 Local 190 24 507 71 75101 BEAL DR TEAL THOREAU 1 Local 320 24 853 75 75102 BEAL DR THOREAU WOOD RIVER 1 Local 305 24 813 75 75103 BEAL DR WOOD RIVER SANTA GERTRUDIS 1 Local 580 24 1,547 75 100200 BLUE WATER WHITE BIRD ALLEY 3 Local 130 24 347 83 100300 BLUE WATER ALLEY SOUTHERN SUN 3 Local 130 24 347 83 100400 BLUE WATER SOUTHERN SUN ALLEY 3 Local 130 24 347 83 100500 BLUE WATER ALLEY ELDERBERRY 3 Local 130 24 347 83 101200 BLUNTZER DEAD END (N) AHERN ST 1 Local 930 20 2,067 75 101300 BLUNTZER AHERN ST R R TRACKS 1 Local 210 20 467 75 101400 BLUNTZER R R TRACKS AGNES (HWY44) 1 Local 305 20 678 75 104500 BONASSE WHITE CAP BLVD DEAD END S 4 Local 870 24 2,320 72 106400 BONNER WEDGEWOOD LN FLYNN PKWY 3 C-1 650 36 2,600 85 118051 BRENDEL LN VIOLET RD CLIFF CRENSHAW RD 1 Local 1120 24 2,987 81 128500 BROCKHAMPTON ST CIMARRON ROAD BOLLINGER 5 C-1 170 36 680 80 128600 BROCKHAMPTON ST BOLLINGER AUDN DR 5 C-1 405 36 1,620 80 128700 BROCKHAMPTON ST AUDN DR NEW BEDFORD 5 C-1 475 36 1,900 80 128800 BROCKHAMPTON ST NEW BEDFORD DONINGTON 5 C-1 290 36 1,160 80 128900 BROCKHAMPTON ST DONINGTON WATERFORD PASS 5 C-1 420 36 1,680 80 129000 BROCKHAMPTON ST WATERFORD PASS STONE HENGE ST 5 C-1 365 36 1,460 80 129100 BROCKHAMPTON ST STONE HENGE ST LIVERPOOL LN 5 C-1 385 36 1,540 80 145500 BUTLER ST VIOLET RD CLIFF CRENSHAW 1 Local 1,115 21 2,602 73 155800 CANADIAN DR VANCOUVER DR ERIE DR 4 Local 250 36 1,000 71 155900 CANADIAN DR ERIE DR PARKGREEN 4 Local 260 21 607 71 156000 CANADIAN DR PARKGREEN WEST MOUNT DR 4 Local 215 36 860 71 156100 CANADIAN DR WEST MOUNT DR OSO PARKWAY 4 Local 275 36 1,100 71 159300 CAPE FEAR CAPE ARON CAPE MAY 4 Local 435 26 1,257 78 159400 CAPE FEAR CAPE MAY CAPE COD 4 Local 340 26 982 78 186500 CEDAR PASS DR ASPEN GROVE TRAPPER'S LAKE 5 C-1 140 36 560 80 186600 CEDAR PASS DR TRAPPER'S LAKE FTCOLLIN DR 5 C-1 230 36 920 80 186700 CEDAR PASS DR FTCOLLIN DR CARBONDALE 5 C-1 235 36 940 80 186800 CEDAR PASS DR CARBONDALE TAOS DR 5 C-1 240 36 960 80 186900 CEDAR PASS DR TAOS DR GOLD RIDGE DR 5 C-1 380 36 1,520 80 187000 CEDAR PASS DR GOLD RIDGE DR RUGGED RIDGE 5 C-1 270 36 1,080 80 187100 CEDAR PASS DR RUGGED RIDGE CANDY RID SR 5 C-1 135 36 540 80 187200 CEDAR PASS DR CANDY RID SR CANDY RIDGE 5 C-1 135 36 540 80 187300 CEDAR PASS DR CANDY RIDGE PEPPER RID SR 5 C-1 135 36 540 80 187400 CEDAR PASS DR PEPPER RID SR PEPPER RIDGE 5 C-1 135 36 540 80 187500 CEDAR PASS DR PEPPER RIDGE SUGAR RID SR 5 C-1 135 36 540 80 187600 CEDAR PASS DR SUGAR RID SR SUGAR RIDGE 5 C-1 135 36 540 80 187700 CEDAR PASS DR SUGAR RIDGE DIAMOND RID SR 5 C-1 135 36 540 80 187800 CEDAR PASS DR DIAMOND RID SR EVERHART 5 C-1 320 36 1,280 80 196200 CHARLES DR HWY 9 (LEOPARD) HARRINGTON DR 1 C-1 645 24 1,720 77 196204 CHARLES DR HARRINGTON DR MAPLE LEAF DR 1 C-1 465 24 1,240 77 196300 CHARLES DR MAPLE LEAF DR TURNING LEAF DR 1 C-1 300 24 800 77 196305 CHARLES DR TURNING LEAF DR STONEWALL BLVD 1 C-1 185 24 493 77 STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORK PLAN CITY SEALCOAT ALPHABETICAL STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 201250 CHINA BEACH DR LA CONCHA BLVD WELKIN COVE 4 Local 170 24 453 79 201251 CHINA BEACH DR WELKIN COVE DEAD END 4 Local 345 24 920 79 216700 CLIFF MAUS BEAR LANE OLD BROWNSVILLE 3 C-1 1,650 36 6,600 84 216800 CLIFF MAUS OLD BROWNSVILLE ROCKFORD 3 C-1 1,085 36 4,340 84 216900 CLIFF MAUS ROCKFORD CULVER 3 C-1 1,090 36 4,360 84 217000 CLIFF MAUS CULVER PADRE ISLAND DR 3 C-1 975 36 3,900 84 238400 CORNELL DR BROCKHAMPTON GEORGIA 5 Local 765 24 2,040 80 238500 CORNELL DR GEORGIA LIPES 5 Local 645 24 1,720 80 241000 COSNER MCARDLE FOLEY 2 Local 1,060 24 2,827 79 241100 COSNER FOLEY MAHAN 2 Local 1,270 24 3,387 79 244600 COWHOUSE CREEK RED RIVER DEAD END N 1 Local 500 24 1,333 72 267450 DAWSON CT LENS DR DEAD END 5 Local 370 24 987 81 267456 DAYS END DR GREENWOOD DR BAY MOON CT 3 Local 745 24 1,987 73 267457 DAYS END DR BAY MOON CT BARRICADE (W) 3 Local 195 24 520 73 1074100 DEL MAR N -SR OCEAN DR SECOND 2 L-A 205 14 319 71 1074200 DEL MAR N -SR SECOND THIRD 2 L-A 210 14 327 71 1074250 DEL MAR N -SR THIRD SANTA FE 2 L-A 195 14 303 71 1074300 DEL MAR N -SR SANTA FE LAWNVIEW 2 L-A 530 12 707 71 1074400 DEL MAR N -SR LAWNVIEW ALAMEDA 2 L-A 805 12 1,073 71 1074500 DEL MAR N -SR ALAMEDA BROWNLEE 2 L-A 575 14 894 71 1074600 DEL MAR N -SR BROWNLEE STAPLES 2 L-A 400 14 622 71 1074700 DEL MAR S -SR STAPLES BROWNLEE 2 L-A 520 14 809 71 1074800 DEL MAR S -SR BROWNLEE ALAMEDA 2 L-A 585 14 910 71 1074900 DEL MAR S -SR ALAMEDA LAWNVIEW 2 L-A 810 14 1,260 71 1075000 DEL MAR S -SR LAWNVIEW SANTA FE 2 L-A 540 14 840 71 1075100 DEL MAR S -SR SANTA FE THIRD 2 L-A 205 14 319 71 1075200 DEL MAR S -SR THIRD OCEAN 2 L-A 495 14 770 71 283000 DIXIE ELGIN CARVER 2 Local 740 24 1,973 73 283100 DIXIE CARVER WASHINGTON 2 Local 400 24 1,067 73 291500 DOUGLAS TAWAKONI CHEROKEE 1 Local 635 24 1,693 73 291700 DOVER LIBERTY DEAD END S. 1 Local 295 26 852 71 293700 DRISCOLL DR NAYLOR N AGNES 1 Local 885 34 3,343 75 295000 DUNBAR GREENWOOD ELGIN 2 Local 340 24 907 83 295100 DUNBAR ELGIN SABINAS 2 Local 330 24 880 83 295200 DUNBAR SABINAS CARVER 2 Local 330 24 880 83 295300 DUNBAR CARVER WASHINGTON 2 Local 240 24 640 83 300800 EASTER DRE MANSHEIM FRANKLIN 3 Local 640 24 1,707 75 300900 EASTER DR W FRANKLIN MANSHEIM 3 Local 660 24 1,760 75 335610 FENWICK DR LOOMIS HAWK 5 Local 280 24 747 78 335611 FENWICK DR HAWK REDDINGTON 5 Local 490 24 1,307 78 335612 FENWICK DR REDDINGTON DEAD END (E) 5 Local 160 24 427 78 345800 FLYNN PKWY HOLLY RD HAVERHILL 3 P-1 180 36 720 75 345900 FLYNN PKWY HAVERHILL COBBLESTONE 3 P-1 310 36 1,240 75 346000 FLYNN PKWY COBBLESTONE COVENTRY 3 P-1 305 36 1,220 75 346100 FLYNN PKWY COVENTRY SUTTON 3 P-1 270 36 1,080 75 346200 FLYNN PKWY SUTTON BONNER 3 P-1 275 36 1,100 75 352300 FRANKLIN E MANSHEIM EASTER 3 Local 650 24 1,733 71 352400 FRANKLIN W EASTER MANSHEIM 3 Local 650 24 1,733 71 397900 GUADALUPE CARVER ELGIN 2 Local 740 24 1,973 76 402450 HAILEY CT LENS DR DEAD END 5 Local 350 24 933 76 410800 HARRIETT GREENWOOD SHAW 3 Local 900 24 2,400 71 417200 HAYES DEAD END E. GULFBREEZE 1 Local 295 19 623 79 417300 HAYES GULFBREEZE SURFSIDE 1 Local 340 20 756 79 430200 HIGHLAND MIST CROWN ROYAL DR CROWN ROYAL DR 4 Local 1,550 24 4,133 72 439400 HONEY TRAIL RED BLUFF MOUNTAIN VIEW 1 Local 380 24 1,013 72 463575 JEREMIAH CT SETH ST DEAD END (N) 4 local 380 24 1,013 72 464400 JESTER FLOUR BLUFF DR MC DONALD 4 Local 275 26 794 72 464500 JESTER DEAD END (W) MILITARY 4 Local 1,495 22 3,654 72 464600 JESTER MILITARY AVIATION 4 Local 320 20 711 72 464800 JESTER ANCHOR NAS DR 4 Local 365 22 892 72 496604 LAGUNA SHORE CARIBBEAN TROPIC BRIDGE 4 P-1 1,250 35 4,861 80 496704 LAGUNA SHORE TROPIC BRIDGE MEDITERRANEAN 4 P-1 1,255 35 4,881 80 509700 LANYARD AQUARIUS QUARTERDECK 4 Local 290 24 773 80 509800 LANYARD QUARTERDECK LIGHTHOUSE 4 Local 320 24 853 80 509900 LANYARD LIGHTHOUSE TOPGALLANT 4 Local 335 24 893 80 510000 LANYARD TOPGALLANT DAS MARINAS 4 Local 265 24 707 80 520500 LEMANS STRASBOURG TARAFAYA 5 Local 320 24 853 84 520600 LEMANS TARAFAYA OUTREAU 5 Local 750 24 2,000 84 STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORK PLAN CITY SEALCOAT ALPHABETICAL STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 520700 LEMANS OUTREAU MARISSA 5 Local 310 24 827 84 520800 LEMANS MARISSA LOVAIN 5 Local 380 24 1,013 84 521510 LENS DR CIMARRON BLVD HAILEY CT 5 Local 145 24 387 79 521520 LENS DR HAILEY CT DAWSON CT 5 Local 270 24 720 79 521530 LENS DR DAWSON CT LANDO CT 5 Local 270 24 720 79 521540 LENS DR LANDO CT SALSA DR 5 Local 275 24 733 79 521550 LENS DR SALSA DR SERENITY CIR 5 Local 280 24 747 79 521560 LENS DR SERENITY CIR POCONO CIR 5 Local 285 24 760 79 521570 LENS DR POCONO CIR BARRIER (E) 5 Local 140 24 373 79 545223 LIPES BLVD SALLY LN KITTY LN 5 C-3 270 44 1,320 78 545230 LIPES BLVD BROCKHAMPTON ST JULIA LN (CIR) 5 C-3 315 44 1,540 78 545233 LIPES BLVD JULIA LN (CIR) ANDREA LN 5 C-3 275 44 1,344 78 545236 LIPES BLVD ANDREA LN CIMMARRON 5 C-3 730 44 3,569 78 563625 MACARENA DR PICANTE DR SALSA DR 5 Local 1,040 24 2,773 72 573000 MARGUERITE BLUNTZER PORT AVE 1 Local 640 24 1,707 77 573100 MARGUERITE PORT AVE HARMON 1 Local 155 24 413 77 573200 MARGUERITE HARMON DUNCAN 1 Local 940 24 2,507 77 577800 MARY ALAMEDA N TENTH 1 Local 325 34 1,228 81 577900 MARY TENTH TENTH 1 Local 145 34 548 81 578000 MARY TENTH ELEVENTH 1 Local 210 34 793 81 578004 MARY ELEVENTH TWELFTH 1 Local 250 34 944 81 578100 MARY TWELFTH BROWNLEE 1 Local 455 34 1,719 81 578200 MARY BROVVNLEE FOURTEENTH 1 Local 325 34 1,228 81 578300 MARY FOURTEENTH CROSSTOWN EXPWY 1 Local 480 34 1,813 81 600050 MIDWEST CIR SAMBA DR DEAD END 5 Local 370 24 987 81 602450 MIMA CIR SAMBA DR DEAD END 5 Local 365 24 973 84 611400 MONTGOMERY MAC ARTHUR EISENHOWER 2 Local 955 24 2,547 77 622050 MOTTS DR SESSIONS RD MESQUITE RIDGE DR 1 Local 150 24 400 71 622055 MOTTS DR MESQUITE RIDGE DR GRANITE PEAK DR 1 Local 525 24 1,400 71 629100 MUSTANG TRAIL STAPLES S GOLLIHAR 2 C-1 1,360 36 5,440 75 664700 NOGALES EISENHOWER MAC ARTHUR 2 Local 950 24 2,533 75 691200 ORIOLE LOVE BIRD DEAD END 4 Local 115 10 128 74 694500 OSAGE HURON LOU 1 Local 685 24 1,827 84 694600 OSAGE LOU AGNES 1 Local 640 24 1,707 84 738650 POCONO CIR LENS DR DEAD END 5 Local 360 24 960 71 757600 PURDUE RD WALDRON RD SCHOOL CIR 4 C-1 340 44 1,662 73 757700 PURDUE RD SCHOOL CIR LOMBARDY 4 C-1 135 44 660 73 757800 PURDUE RD LOMBARDY GREER 4 C-1 790 36 3,160 73 757900 PURDUE RD GREER OLLIE 4 C-1 280 36 1,120 73 758000 PURDUE RD OLLIE WINDMERE 4 C-1 250 36 1,000 73 758100 PURDUE RD WINDMERE LUZUIS 4 C-1 1,005 36 4,020 73 758200 PURDUE RD LUZIUS HANDLIN 4 C-1 330 36 1,320 73 758300 PURDUE RD HANDLIN RETTA 4 C-1 330 36 1,320 73 758400 PURDUE RD RETTA SENTINEL 4 C-1 645 36 2,580 73 758500 PURDUE RD SENTINEL VIALOUX 4 C-1 370 36 1,480 73 758600 PURDUE RD VIALOUX WOODCREST 4 C-1 140 36 560 73 758700 PURDUE RD WOODCREST FLOUR BLUFF DR 4 C-1 650 44 3,178 73 761600 QUEBEC DR VICTORIA PARK EDMONTON 4 Local 315 24 840 72 761610 QUEBEC DR EDMONTON CALGARY 4 Local 160 24 427 72 761620 QUEBEC DR CALGARY OSO PKWY 4 Local 1,020 24 2,720 72 763750 RADIAL CT SAMBA DR DEAD END 5 Local 360 24 960 85 771951 REDDINGTON BAUER DEAD END 5 Local 135 24 360 70 818176 SALSA DR LENS DR PICANTE DR 5 Local 630 36 2,520 74 818177 SALSA DR PICANTE DR MACARENA DR 5 Local 270 36 1,080 74 818450 SAMBA DR CIMARRON BLVD MIMA CIR 5 Local 150 36 600 83 818455 SAMBA DR MIMA CIR TANGO CIR 5 Local 275 36 1,100 83 818460 SAMBA DR TANGO CIR MIDWEST CIR 5 Local 270 36 1,080 83 818465 SAMBA DR MIDWEST CIR SALSA DR 5 Local 275 36 1,100 83 818470 SAMBA DR SALSA DR AZIMUTH CT 5 Local 280 24 747 83 818475 SAMBA DR AZIMUTH CT RADIAL CT 5 Local 290 24 773 83 818480 SAMBA DR RADIAL CT BARRIER (E) 5 Local 140 24 373 83 826300 SAN JACINTO PORT AVE LAMAR 2 Local 855 24 2,280 78 823700 SAND PIPER DRN SAND PIPER DRE SAND PIPER CIR 4 Local 1,060 24 2,827 71 834303 SANTA GERTRUDIS DR BEAL DR BEAL DR 1 Local 2,030 24 5,413 76 852850 SERENITY CIR LENS DR DEAD END 5 Local 365 24 973 80 980700 UP RIVER RD PALM DR WESTGATE 1 C-1 1,960 37 8,058 76 980900 UP RIVER RD WESTGATE LONGVIEW 1 C-1 435 37 1,788 76 981000 UP RIVER RD LONGVIEW NUECES BAY 1 C-1 190 37 781 76 STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SPMP) - 2017 WORK PLAN CITY SEALCOAT ALPHABETICAL STR ID STREET FROM TO District Class LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) YD2 PCI 981004 UP RIVER RD NUECES BAY FAIRVIEW 1 C-1 165 37 678 76 995100 VERA CRUZ BALDWIN NAVAJO 3 Local 840 24 2,240 84 1013400 WASHINGTON DUNBAR TARLTON 2 Local 655 24 1,747 83 1025100 WEST MOUNT DR CANADIAN DR PARKGREEN 4 Local 710 24 1,893 71 1028400 WHARTON ST SANTA ANA ST SOKOL ST 3 Local 890 24 2,373 71 SPMP Work Plan (2014, 2015, 2016, & 2017) and BOND Work 2012 - 2014 • Cal Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) Update & 2017 Work Plan Council Presentation January 17, 2017 Street Improvement Plan (SIP) Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) RPUs C'`,�� STREET PREV ENTATIV RECONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE ARTERIALS / COLLECTORS PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS RECONSTRUCTION LOCAL RESIDENTIAL ,MPRovE STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM "?0VEMENT PLP Citywide Street Maintenance PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE SPMP Overlays Streets w/ PCI ^' 56 75% of Funding ADA Improvements Performed Year round Seal Coats Streets w/ PCI ^' 71 25% of Funding Minimal Curb & Gutter Imp. Subject to weather conditions Street Operations Seal Coats Streets w/ PCI ^' 71 Operating Budget Minimal Curb & Gutter Imp. Subject to weather conditions 2014 (Year 1) SPMP Streets Maintained Overlays 58 Seal Coats 84 Street Operations 64 Total 206 SYs 289,903 430,775 350,028 1,070,706 Linear Miles 17 26 21 %Arterial 39% 31% 27% % Collector 12% 22% 20% Residential/Local 49% 47% 53% Status Completed Feb. 2015 Completed Oct. 2015 Completed Sep. 2014 64 2015 (Year 2) SPMP Streets Maintained SYs Linear Miles Overlays 41 Seal Coats* 73 Street Operations 56 Total 170 181,709 309,129 290,031 780,869 41 11 15 15 % Arterial 19% 28% 47% % Collector 28% 26% 13% % Residential/Local 53% 46% 40% Status Completed Jul. 2016 In Progress Completed Oct. 2015 *Executed concurrently with 2016 Work Plan. Construction by Bay started 6/1/15. Construction by JCW started 8/1/16. 2016 (Year 3) SPMP Summary 1 Streets Maintained 93 SYs 361,753 Linear Miles 20 Seal Coats* 108 356,646 21 Street Operations 80 313,739 16 % Arterial 24% 7% 10% % Collector 22% 30% 29% % Residential/Local 54% 63% 61% Status 40% Complete/In Progress In Progress Completed Nov. 2016 Total 281 1,032,138 57 *Executed concurrently with 2015 Work Plan 3 -Year Summary 2014 (Year 1) 2015 (Year 2) 2016 (Year 3) 3 -Year Total OVERLAY (Contractor) # Streets 58 41 93 192 Square Yards 289,903 181,709 361,753 833,365 Miles 17 11 20 48 SEAL (Contractor) # Streets 84 73 108 265 Square Yards 430,775 309,129 356,646 1,096,550 Miles 26 15 21 62 SEAL (City) # Streets 64 56 80 200 Square Yards 350,028 290,031 313,739 953,798 Miles 21 15 16 52 Total # Streets 206 170 281 657 Square Yards 1,070,706 780,869 1,032,138 2,883,713 Miles 64 41 57 162 2017 (Year 4) SPMP Work Plan SPMP Street Selection Criteria (Presented 11/19/2013) 1. Work based on Pavement Condition Index (PCI) scores: 1. Approximately 56 for Overlays and 71 for Seal Coat 2. Work the ones closest to 56 and 71 first 2. Distribute by District based on Capital Assets needing Maintenance (% of Network) 3. Distribute by Street Classification (Residential, Collectors & Arterials) based on Capital Assets (% of Network) 4. Coordinate work for Residential by Neighborhood and initial subdivision construction dates 5. Distribute work by percentage of Overlay and Seal Coats 6. Prioritize by traffic loads causing potential premature failure of roadway SPMP Requirements & 2017 (Year 4) Work Plan Comparison Maintenance Requirements by District Maintenance Requirements by Road Classification 2017 SPMP Work Plan by District Dist. 1 25% Dist. 2 12% 2017 SPMP Work Plan by Road Class Target percentages based on Square Yards of Pavement in each District/Category relative to the total City System. aho • COYe 2017 (Year 4) SPMP Work Plan �.a Streets Maintained SYs Linear Miles Overlays 41 Seal Coats 25 210,196 237,635 12 10 Street Operations 71 Total 137 271,187 719,018 17 % Arterial 34 47 0 % Collector 10 22 38 % Residential/Local 56 31 62 39 11 4 -Year Summary 2014 (Year 1) 2015 (Year 2) 2016 (Year 3) 2017 (Year 4) 4 -Year Total OVERLAY (Contractor) #Streets 58 41 93 41 233 Square Yards 289,903 181,709 361,753 210,196 1,043,561 Miles 17 11 20 12 60 SEAL (Contractor) #Streets 84 73 108 25 290 Square Yards 430,775 309,129 356,646 237,635 1,334,185 Miles 26 15 21 10 72 SEAL (City) # Streets 64 56 80 71 271 Square Yards 350,028 290,031 313,739 271,187 1,224,985 Miles 21 15 16 17 69 Total #Streets 206 170 281 137 794 Square Yards 1,070,706 780,869 1,032,138 719,018 3,602,731 Miles 64 41 57 39 201 Next Steps ➢ Approve 2017 Work Plan (Resolution) ➢ Approve Overlay Construction Contract(s) 13 SPMP Program Status ➢ Website for Program status reports http://www.cctexas.com/govern ment/street-operations/preventative- maintenance-spmp/index StMlt 1.1•11.0. klitYVIty CAM ®.m.AAN+ YOUR STREET SYSTE WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS OF STREET MAINTENANCE? Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) - Extending the Life of Our Streets Mat Tau Gen 00 to Maintain Landman &Your SInal ANNUALeAIRI(PLAN YurdlPotSl � � oa o OPEN ACCESS GIS MAP 14 Questions? Extending the life of our streets. 15 SPMP Overlay Lake Apache - Before Lake Apache - After SPMP Overlay Skipper - Before Skipper - After 17 SPMP Seal Coat Corinth - Before Corinth - After SPMP Seal Coat Aspenwood - Before Aspenwood - After AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of January 31, 2017 DATE: 1/10/2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Stacie Talbert Anaya, Interim Director, Parks and Recreation Department StacieT(c�cctexas.com 361-826-3464 Ordinance authorizing the FY16-17 transfer and appropriation of City grant matching funds for the Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) Grant and the Senior Companion Program (SCP) Grant CAPTION: Ordinance transferring $79,173 from the No. 1020 General Fund to and appropriating in the No. 1067 Parks and Recreation Grant Fund as matching grant funds for the Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) and transferring $76,903 from the No. 1020 General Fund to and appropriating in the No. 1067 Parks and Recreation Grant Fund as matching grant funds for the Senior Companion Program (SCP); amending Ordinance No. 030818 to authorize the transfer of matching grant funds for the RSVP and SCP programs budgeted in the No. 1020 General fund to and appropriate them in the No. 1067 Parks and Recreation Grant Fund for said programs. PURPOSE: Transfer and appropriation of City grant matching funds to allow for the continuation of the Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) and the Senior Companion Program (SCP). To amend the annual Ordinance, Enactment No: 030818 to include the matching funds. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The City receives grant funding for both the Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) and Senior Companion Program (SCP) through Federal, State and local grants, in addition to City grant matching funds that must be appropriated each year. The grants are awarded through a contract with the Corporation for National and Community Service. The RSVP program has proven to be exceptionally beneficial to both senior citizens and various public and private agencies in Corpus Christi. The program received $70,605 in federal and state funds. RSVP volunteers are individuals 55 years or older who utilize their talents and experience to serve the needs of the community. During the previous grant period (7/01/2015-6/30/16) and fiscal year 2015-2016, 395 enrolled volunteers contributed 45,646 hours through more than 38 different non-profit organizations like the, Deaf and Hard of Hearing Center, Mission of Mercy, VA Clinic, and other community based organizations such as the Corpus Christi Medical Center, USS Lexington, and AARP Chapter. The Senior Companion Program (SCP) allows low-income volunteers 55 years and over, who are willing to become Senior Companions, serve homebound elderly and/or disabled persons 21 years of age or older. Senior Companions also provide respite services to caregivers who are caring for their loved ones at home. Many of the caregivers provide around the clock care. The respite service allows them to run errands, care for their families and get a few hours of well-deserved rest. The Senior Companion Program has approximately 68 volunteers who have provided over 67,065 service hours. The program received federal and state funding of $329,832. ALTERNATIVES: Reject the City match and discontinue the RSVP and SCP Programs. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Council authorization is required to appropriate City grant matching funds. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal, Finance, Budget FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $156,076 $156,076 Encumbered/ Expended Amount This item(transfer)RSVP $79,173 $79,173 This item (transfer)SCP $76,903 $76,903 BALANCE -0- -0- Fund(s): General Fund — 1020; Parks and Recreation Grant Fund - 1067 Comments: This grant requires City matching funds, which were budgeted in the FY17 City General Fund. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends transfer and appropriation of the City matching funds for the continuation of the Retired Senior Volunteer Program and Senior Companion Program and amendment of Ordinance No. 030818. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Ordinance transferring $79,173 from the No. 1020 General Fund to and appropriating in the No. 1067 Parks and Recreation Grant Fund as matching grant funds for the Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) and transferring $76,903 from the No. 1020 General Fund to and appropriating in the No. 1067 Parks and Recreation Grant Fund as matching grant funds for the Senior Companion Program (SCP); amending Ordinance No. 030818 to authorize the transfer of matching grant funds for the RSVP and SCP programs budgeted in the No. 1020 General fund to and appropriate them in the No. 1067 Parks and Recreation Grant Fund for said programs. Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas: SECTION 1. That $79,173 is transferred from the No. 1020 General Fund to and appropriated in the No. 1067 Parks and Recreation Grants Fund as matching grant funds for the Retired Senior Volunteer Program. SECTION 2. That $76,903 is transferred from the No. 1020 General Fund to and appropriated in the No. 1067 Parks and Recreation Grants Fund as matching grant funds for the Senior Companion Program. SECTION 3. That the Ordinance No. 030818 which authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute documents to apply for and accept grants from the Corporation for National and Community Service for the RSVP and SCP Programs is amended by adding new Section 8 to read as follows: "Section 8. The matching grant funds for the Retired Senior Volunteer Program and the Senior Companion Program as budgeted in the No. 1020 General Fund are transferred to and appropriated in the No. 1067 Parks and Recreation Grant Fund as matching funds for said programs." That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Dan McQueen Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Joe McComb That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Dan McQueen Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Joe McComb PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Dan McQueen Mayor AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of January 31, 2017 DATE: January 10, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Stacie Talbert Anaya, Interim Director, Parks and Recreation Department StacieT@cctexas.com 361-826-3460 Community Enrichment Fund (4720) Appropriation CAPTION: Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept and appropriate $318,198.30 in developer contributions, other donations and interest earnings in the 4720 Community Enrichment Fund for park improvements and other related projects as described on the attached and incorporated Exhibit A. PURPOSE: To appropriate funds received from developer fees, other donations and interest earned in the Community Enrichment Fund so that the funds would be available for associated projects. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The Unified Development Code (UDC), Section 8.3.6., provides that, should the City accept fee in lieu of land or park development fees, the fees shall be used for the acquisition or improvement of parks most likely to serve the residents of the subdivision. Community Enrichment Funds shall be used only for parkland acquisition, park development and park improvements including utility extensions required to serve recreational areas. The last appropriation of Community Enrichment Funds was approved by City Council on July 19, 2016. ALTERNATIVES: Do not collect fees in lieu of land or park development fees for the acquisition or improvement of parks. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: City policy requires all funds drawn from the city treasury be appropriated by City Council before they can be expended. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal, Finance FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating X Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016- 2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $3,220,457.73 $3,220,457.73 Encumbered/Expended Amount $165,056.45 $165,056.45 This item 318,198.30 318,198.30 BALANCE $3,373,599.58 $3,373,599.58 Fund(s): The No. 4720 Community Enrichment Fund was established to record revenues and expenditures for park land acquisition, park development, and improvement of parks. Comments: Revenues deposited to this fund for park development are 1) fees in lieu of land, and, 2) park development fee. Funds are appropriated periodically. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this agenda item. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Attachment — Schedule of Appropriations — Exhibit A Presentation Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to accept and appropriate $318,198.30 in developer contributions, other donations and interest earnings in the 4720 Community Enrichment Fund for park improvements and other related projects as described on the attached and incorporated Exhibit A. Be it Ordained by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, that: Section 1. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute all documents necessary to accept and appropriate $318,198.30 in developer contributions, other donations and interest earnings in the 4720 Community Enrichment Fund for park improvements, and other related projects as described on the attached and incorporated Exhibit A. Attest: City of Corpus Christi Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Dan McQueen Mayor That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Dan McQueen Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Joe McComb That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Dan McQueen Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Joe McComb PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Dan McQueen Mayor Account # Org. # 330200 21300 340000 21300 330200 21460 330006 21318 330006 21382 330006 21432 330006 21451 330435 21502 330006 21528 330006 21627 330006 21638 330006 21664 330006 21674 340000 21440 330395 21371 330405 21357 330435 21502 330555 21507 330635 21511 341040 21300 341040 21460 City of Corpus Christi 4720 Community Enrichment Fund - Revenue only For FY16 - Period June 1, 2016 to September 30, 2016 Description Park Acq or Devel- Unrestricted Park Acq or Devel- Unrestricted Development Fees - Cm Enr Fd Tyler Subdivision 5 Bordeaux Bayview Subdivision Nueces Gardens #2, L38A-38C Beautification Promotion Donation Los Vientos@ Tena Mar Maples Hill Meadow Park Addition Riverview Tracts BuenaVista Park Memorials CONTRIBUTIONS Gateway Project - Ph 2 Interest HEB Park Pool & Tennis Interest Beautification Promotion Interest Ed Exchg Prog- Sister City Interest Permanent Art Interest Park Acq or Devel- Unrestricted Interest Development fees - Interest INTEREST June -September 2016 Unappropriated Balance $ 19,200.00 $ 113,956.10 $ 51,600.00 $ 1,875.00 $ 17,402.93 $ 1,250.00 $ 339.84 $ 8,500.00 $ 22,050.00 $ 17,680.55 $ 625.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 19,625.00 $ 5,650.00 $ 309,754.42 $ 133.13 $ 27.52 $ 140.97 $ 9.32 $ 2,194.70 $ 2,690.42 $ 3,247.82 $ 8,443.88 TOTAL REVENUE FOR APPROPRIATION $ 318,198.30 Designated Park Project Major Investment Parks Major Investment Parks/Neighborhood Parks Neighborhood Parks Waldron Park Brighton Park, Brockhampton Park Ropes Park Alexander Park Dilworth Park Oso Bay Wetland Preserve/Learning Center Thebeau Park Joe Garza/Zavala Center Labonte Park Waldron Park, Parker Park Park Memorials Gateway Park HEB Pool Downtown Parks Sister Cities Park Permanent Art Major Investment Parks Neighborhood Parks Parks & Recreation Department Community Enrichment Funds CORPUS CHRISTI PARKS& RECRCATION Council Presentation January 24, 2017 Community Enrichment Fund • Established to hold *Donations *Public Open Space Fees *Proceeds from Sales • Unified Development Code, Article 8.3 Public Open Space • Requires developers to meet two requirements • Parkland Requirement ■ Single Family =1 acre per 100 dwellings ■ Multi -family = 1 acre per 200 dwellings ■ Cash in lieu of land • Land requirement x Market value of acre • Maximum market value cap: $62,500/ acre • Regional, community and neighborhood parks ■ within 5 miles per master plan Community Enrichment Fund CORPUS CHRISTI PARKS& RECREATION • UDC Public Open Space continued • Park Development ■ $200 per dwelling unit ■ Plan and improve park development in regional, community and neighborhood parks ■ Per the master plan 3 Community Enrichment Funds CORPUS CHRISTI PARKS& RECREATION Major Investment Parks West Guth Bill Witt Parker and Waldron Labonte Captain Falcon Neighborhood Parks Playgrounds and Fitness Equipment Tree Planting Project Hike and Bike Trail Development 4 Questions from Park Fans CORPUS CHRISTI PARKS& RECREATION 5 AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading Item for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 Second Reading Item for the City Council Meeting of February 21, 2017 DATE: TO: January 13, 2017 Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Stacie Talbert Anaya, Interim Director, Parks and Recreation Department StacieT@cctexas.com 361-826-3460 Lease Agreement with the Buccaneer Commission for the Tex-Mex Railroad Depot CAPTION: Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a five- year lease agreement with Buccaneer Commission for the use of Tex Mex Railroad Depot located at 1800 block of Chaparral Street, in consideration of rental payments of $600 per month increasing to $750 per month in third year and $900 per month in fourth year; and providing for options to extend for up to two additional five-year terms with rental rates to be increased each five-year term by ten percent; and providing for publication. PURPOSE: Lease the Tex Mex Railroad Depot to the Buccaneer Commission for office space for its operations and coordination of the Buc Days Festival, Parade, Rodeo and other community -wide events. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The Buccaneer Commission has leased the Jalufka-Gavatos House located in Heritage Park for since 2006 for a monthly payment of $400. This has been a very good partnership for the Parks & Recreation Department and the City as a whole. The Commission, however, has outgrown the space and needs additional room to host event planning meetings, workshops and other gatherings. A five-year lease with the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce prior to their merger with the Corpus Christi Chamber of Commerce (United Chamber of Commerce — now) was executed for the Tex- Mex Railroad Depot in January 2015. The Chambers officially vacated the Depot in early January 2017. Because of the funds the Chamber spent on rehabilitating the building, their lease payments were scheduled to be $0 in lieu of repairs for the first 36 -months; $450 for months 37-48; $900 for months 49-60. Due to the length of the terms, this item requires two readings 28 days apart and takes effect 61st day. The proposed lease of the Depot to the Buccaneer Commission includes a tiered rent schedule to accommodate further repairs and updates the Commission has proposed for the building. ALTERNATIVES: Do not approve the lease for the Tex-Mex Railroad Depot. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: City Council must approve all lease agreements. This item requires a 28 -day delay between readings per City Charter. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating Revenue ❑ Capital X Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016- 2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): General Fund Comments: As the revenue for the lease of this facility is already included in the FY2017 operating budget, no additional impact is anticipated. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the lease of the Tex-Mex Railroad Depot to the Buccaneer Commission LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Proposed Lease Agreement Lease Agreement Exhibit A Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a five- year lease agreement with Buccaneer Commission for the use of Tex Mex Railroad Depot located at 1800 block of Chaparral Street, in consideration of rental payments of $600 per month increasing to $750 per month in third year and $900 per month in fourth year; and providing for options to extend for up to two additional five-year terms with rental rates to be increased each five-year term by ten percent; and providing for publication. Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas: SECTION 1. That the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute a five- year lease agreement with the Buccaneer Commission for the use of Tex Mex Railroad Depot located at 1800 block of Chaparral Street, in consideration of rental payments of $600 per month, increasing to $750 per month in year 3 of the lease and $900 per month in year 4 of the lease, with options to extend for up to two additional five-year terms with rental rates to be increased each five-year term by ten percent. A copy of the Agreement is on file with the City Secretary. Publication shall be made as required by the City Charter. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Dan McQueen Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Joe McComb That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Dan McQueen Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Joe McComb PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Dan McQueen Mayor LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND BUCCANEER COMMISSION STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF NUECES § This lease agreement ("Lease") is entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation ("City"), acting through its duly authorized City Manager, or his designee ("City Manager"), and the Corpus Christi Buccaneer Commission ("Lessee"). WHEREAS, the City is the owner of real property known as the Tex-Mex Railroad Depot located at 1823 Chaparral, Corpus Christi Texas, together with all improvements thereon ("Premises"); WHEREAS, Lessee has requested the use of the Premises for the purpose of office space for its operations as the Buccaneer Commission, upon the conditions and covenants contained in this Lease; and, WHEREAS, City desires to allow Lessee to use the Premises for this purpose. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Lessee, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, agree as follows: Section 1 Definitions. (A) City means the City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas, a home rule municipal corporation. (B) City Manager means the City's City Manager or the City Manager's designee. (C) Director means the City's Director of Park and Recreation or the Director of Park and Recreation's designee. (D) Lease means this lease document, including all attached and incorporated exhibits. (E) Lessee means Buccaneer Commission. (F) Parks means the City's Park and Recreation Department. (G) Premises means the Tex-Mex Railroad Depot located at 1823 Chaparral, Corpus Christi Texas, together with all improvements thereon, including parking spaces, as depicted on the attached and incorporated Exhibit A. However, the parking spaces will be available for general public use after Lessee's regular office hours. 2 Section 2. Purpose. The purpose of this Lease, between City and Lessee, is to enable Lessee to utilize Premises for office space for its day-to-day nonprofit corporation operations. Lessee shall not operate the Premises for any other purpose without Director's prior written approval. Section 3. Term. The City leases the Premises, subject to all terms and conditions of this Lease, to the Lessee for an initial five-year term which begins the sixty-first day after final City Council approval, unless sooner terminated as set out herein. This lease may be extended for up to two additional five-year terms upon written agreement of the City Manager and Lessee. The rental rates shall increase in the extension terms as follows: The monthly rent increases by 1O% at the beginning of each five-year extension term. Section 4. Acceptance of Premises Disclaimer: A. LESSEE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT IS LEASING THE PREMISES "AS IS WITH ALL FAULTS AS MAY EXIST ON THE PREMISES, AND THAT NEITHER LESSOR, NOR ANY EMPLOYEE OR AGENT OF LESSOR, HAS MADE ANY REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES AS TO THE CONDITION OF SUCH PREMISES. LESSEE HEREBY WAIVES ANY AND ALL CAUSES OF ACTION, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, AND DAMAGES BASED ON ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF SUITABILITY FOR APARTICULAR PURPOSE, ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES OF HABITABILITY, AND ANY OTHER IMPLIED WARRANTIES NOT EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS LEASE. B. LESSEE ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT LESSEE HAS BEEN PROVIDED, TO ITS SATISFACTION, THE OPPORTUNITY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES FOR ANY DEFECTS AS TO THE SUITABILITY OF SUCH PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE TO WHICH LESSEE INTENDS TO USE THE PREMISES, AND IS RELYING ON ITS OWN INSPECTION. C. LESSEE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT ANY AND ALL STRUCTURES AND IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING ON THE PREMISES ON THE COMMENCEMENT DATE, IF ANY, ARE ACCEPTED "AS IS" WITH ANY AND ALL LATENT AND PATENT DEFECTS AND THAT THERE ARE NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, BY LESSOR WITH RESPECT THERETO. LESSEE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT IS NOT RELYING UPON ANY REPRESENTATION, STATEMENT OR OTHER ASSERTION BY LESSOR WITH RESPECT TO ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES OR IMPROVEMENTS, BUT IS RELYING ON ITS EXAMINATION THEREOF. D. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS Section 4 SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS LEASE. 3 Section 5. Lease Payments. (A) For and in consideration of the rights and privileges herein granted, Lessee agrees to pay the City, as follows monthly rents as follows: $600 per month, increasing to $750 per month beginning February 2018, and increasing to $900 per month beginning February 2019. (B) The monthly rent increases by 10% at the beginning of each five-year extension term. (C) All rental fees are due and payable on or before the 10th day of each month for the term of this Lease. Payment must be made to the order of the City of Corpus Christi and mailed to the City Collections Department, P. O. Box 9257, Corpus Christi, TX, 78469, or delivered to City Hall at 1201 Leopard Street, Corpus Christi, TX, 78401. Section 6. Construction of Improvements. Prior to commencing any work at the Premises, Lessee shall coordinate with the Director of Parks and Recreation to verify that Lessee has sufficient funds on hand to complete the planned improvements, ("Improvements"), will comply with City permitting process, and will obtain prior approval from the Director of Parks and Recreation regarding any work at the Premises. Lessee shall require the contractors who are awarded contracts for construction of the Improvements to furnish the following bonds by surety companies authorized to do business in Texas: Payment Bond — A payment bond in the amount of One Hundred Percent of the contract shall be furnished for the protection of all persons, firms, and corporations who may furnish materials or perform labor. The payment bond shall be made with City as an obligee. However, this requirement does not apply if the amount of the construction contract is $25,000 or less. Performance Bond. A performance bond in the amount of One Hundred Percent of the contract shall be furnished covering the faithful performance of the contract. The performance bond shall be made with City as an obligee. However, this requirement does not apply if the amount of the construction contract is $50,000 or less. Lessee shall include in all construction contracts for the Improvements, in large, bold face text: "Contractor does hereby agree to release, indemnify, defend and hold harmless City of Corpus Christi, and all of its officials, officers, agents and employees, in both their public and private capacities, from and against any and all liability, claims, losses, damages, suits, demands or causes of action including 4 all expenses of litigation and/or settlement, court costs and attorney fees which may arise by reason of injury to or death of any person or for loss of, damage to, or loss of use of any property occasioned by error, omission, or negligent act of contractor, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, invitees or any other person arising out of or in connection with the performance of the construction contract, and contractor shall at his or her own cost and expense defend and protect the City of Corpus Christi from any and all such claims and demands." Lessee shall also require the contractors in all construction agreements for the Improvements to furnish insurance in such amounts as specified in Exhibit B. Lessee agrees that the Director of Engineering Services or designee, as well as the Director of Parks and Recreation or designee, will make visits to the Premises at intervals appropriate to the various stages of construction, as they deem necessary. Lessee agrees that the Director of Engineering Services or designee will have the authority to reject Work believed to be defective. Lessee agrees to promptly correct all defective work. Lessee agrees that all work performed shall be done in full compliance and in accordance with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations, including but not limited to the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines and such work shall be subject to City inspection during the performance thereof and after it is completed. Lessee shall discharge all obligations to contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, workmen and/or other persons for all work performed and for materials furnished for or on account of Lessee as such obligations mature. Lessee expressly agrees that it will neither give nor grant, nor purport to give or grant any mechanic's or materialmen's lien upon the City's property or upon any Improvements thereupon in the process of construction or repair, nor allow any condition to exist or situation to develop whereby any party should be entitled, as a matter of law, to a mechanic's or materialmen's lien against the City's property or the Improvements thereon, and Lessee will discharge any such lien within thirty (30) days after notice of filing thereof. Lessee shall conduct its operations under this Agreement in an orderly and proper manner, considering the nature of such operation, so as not to unreasonably annoy, disturb, or endanger others. The complete cost of developing all necessary plans and specifications, as provided in this Agreement, and the cost of construction of the Improvements shall be borne solely by the Lessee at no expense to the City whatsoever. Lessee shall pay all taxes, special assessments, or levies, if any, assessed against the Premises or Improvements. Upon completion of the Improvements, Lessee shall donate them to the City upon acceptance by the City Director of Parks and Recreation. Any warranties given to Lessee 5 regarding the Improvements shall be transferred and assigned to the City at the same time as the Improvements are accepted by the City. Section 7. Utilities. (A) Lessee shall be responsible to obtain and pay for all utilities to the Premises, including but not limited to, telephone, Internet, electricity, water, wastewater, and solid waste. (B) Lessee shall pay for all utilities related to usage of Premises prior to the due date. Failure to pay any utility bill(s) prior to the due date constitutes grounds for termination of this Lease. Section 8. Abandonment, Interruption of Utilities, Removal of Lessee's Property, and Lockout. Chapter 93 of the Texas Property Code governs the rights and obligations of the parties with regard to: (a) abandonment of the leased premises; (b) interruption of utilities; (c) removal of Lessee's personal property; and (d) lock out of Lessee. Section 9. Maintenance. During the term of this Lease, Lessee will repair and maintain, at its sole expense, the Premises and any improvements on the Premises including without limitation all fixtures connected therewith, and all personal property thereon. However, the City shall be responsible for repairs to the HVAC system and repairs to the roof, subject to provisions of Section 29 and subject to availability and appropriation of funds. City has no obligation for such repairs if funds are not budgeted and appropriated for such purpose during the annual City budget process. Lessee shall obtain, at its own expense, all required building permits, all utility services, garbage collection, janitorial services, and similar services. Section 10. Furniture, Fixtures, Equipment and Parking. (A) It is understood that Lessee will be responsible for furnishing and equipping the Premises and that the City has no obligation to furnish any equipment or furnishings for Lessee. (B) All capital construction to the premises, such as installation of electrical or plumbing fixtures, remains the property of the City. (C) Lessee may place signage for the reserved parking spaces shown on the attached Exhibit A to indicate that the parking spaces are reserved for Lessee during its business hours and during Buc Days events. Section 11. City Use. 6 City retains the right to use or cross the Premises with utility lines and easements. City may exercise these rights without compensation to Lessee for damages to the Premises from installing, maintaining, repairing, or removing the utility lines and easements. City must use reasonable judgment in locating the utility lines and easements to minimize damage to the Premises. Section 12. Laws Affecting Operation of Premises and Performance. (A) Lessee shall ensure that its use of the Premises is in accordance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. Lessee shall bear the expense and responsibility of meeting all requirements for acquiring all applicable licenses and permits related to its operations. Lessee shall also bear the expense of meeting and complying with all health regulations and Certificate of Occupancy requirements. (B) Section 13. Inspection. Any officer or authorized employee of the City may enter upon the Premises, at all reasonable times and notice, to determine whether Lessee is providing maintenance in accordance with and as required by above, or for any other purpose incidental to City's retained rights of and in the Premises. Section 14. Relationship of Parties. This Lease establishes a landlord/tenant relationship, and none other, and this Lease must be construed conclusively in favor of that relationship. In performing this Lease, both City and Lessee will act in an individual capacity and not as agents, representatives, employees, employers, partners, joint venturers, or associates of one another. The employees or agents of either party shall not be, nor be construed to be, the employees or agents of the other party for any purpose whatsoever. Section 15. Insurance. (A) Lessee shall secure and maintain at Lessee's expense, during the term of this Lease, insurance of the type and with the amount of coverage shown on the Exhibit "B", which is incorporated in this Lease by reference. (B) The Certificate of Insurance must be sent to the Risk Manager prior to occupancy of and operations at the Premises. Lessee agrees to notify Lessor of any substantive change to its insurance coverage. (C) Lessee shall provide, during the term of this Lease, copies of all insurance policies to the Risk Manager upon written request by the City Manager. The Risk Manager shall retain the right to annually review the amount and types of insurance maintained by Lessee, to require increased coverage limits, if reasonably 7 necessary in the interest of public health, safety, or welfare, and to decrease coverage, if so warranted. (D) in the event of any necessary increase, Lessee shall receive ninety (90) days written notice prior to the effective date of the requirement to obtain increased coverage. In the event alcoholic beverages are to be served or consumed on any Premises covered by this Lease, the Lessee shall additionally obtain or cause to be obtained alcoholic beverage liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) covering the event or time period when alcoholic beverages are to be served or consumed. (E) Lessee shall, prior to any addition or alteration to, in, on, or about the Premises, obtain prior clearance, in writing, from the Risk Manager that the proposed addition or alteration will not necessitate a change or modification in the existing insurance coverage maintained by Lessee. This clearance is in addition to the prior consent required by Section 6, as contained herein. (F) The City carries the property and flood insurance on the building. Lessee is responsible for insuring its own contents. Section 16. Indemnity. In consideration of allowing Lessee to use the Premises, Lessee ("Indemnitor") covenants to fully indemnify, save and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees (collectively, "Indemnitees") from and against any and all liability, loss, damages, claims, demands, suits, and causes of action of any nature whatsoever asserted against or recovered from City on account of injury or damage to person including, without limitation on the foregoing, premises defects, workers' compensation and death claims, or property loss or damage of any other kind whatsoever, to the extent any injury, damage, or loss may be incident to, arise out of, be caused by, or be in any way connected with, either proximately or remotely, wholly or in part: (1) Lessee's performance pursuant to this Lease; (2) Lessee's use of the Premises and any and all activities associated therewith pursuant to this Lease; (3) the violation by Lessee, its officers, employees, agents, or representatives or by Indemnitees or any of them, of any law, rule, regulation, ordinance, or government order of any kind pertaining, directly or indirectly, to this Lease; (4) the exercise of rights under this Lease; or (5) an act or omission on the part of Lessee, its officers, employees, agents, or representatives or of Indemnitees, or any of them, pertaining to this Lease, regardless of whether the injury, damage, loss, violation, exercise of rights, act or omission is caused or is claimed to be caused by the contributing or concurrent negligence of Indemnitees, or any of them, but not if caused by the sole negligence of Indemnitees, or any of them, unmixed with the fault of any other person or entity and including all expenses of litigation, court costs, and attorneys' fees, which arise, or are claimed to arise, out of or in connection with the asserted or recovered incident. Lessee covenants and agrees that, if City is made a party to any litigation against Lessee or in any litigation commenced by any party, other than Lessee relating to this Lease, Lessee shall, upon receipt of reasonable notice regarding 8 commencement of litigation, at its own expense, investigate all claims and demands, attend to their settlement or other disposition, defend City in all actions based thereon with legal counsel satisfactory to City, and pay all charges of attorneys and all other costs and expenses of any kind whatsoever arising from any said liability, injury, damage, loss, demand, claim or action. Such indemnity provisions contained in this Section 16 herein apply to the extent insurance (as approved by City in Section 15) may apply for protection of the City and Lessee. Section 17. Alterations. (A) Lessee agrees not to harm the Premises beyond normal wear and tear. B) All alterations, improvements, and additions made by the Lessee upon said Premises, which are permanent in nature, even if made at Lessee's own expense, shall, if not removed by Lessee at any termination or cancellation hereof, become the property of the City in fee simple without any other action or process of law. Lessee agrees to be contractually and financially responsible for repairing any and all damage caused by such removal. If items are installed in such a manner as to become fixtures, such fixtures shall not be removed by Lessee upon termination and shall become the property of the City. Section 18. Signs. (A) Lessee shall not exhibit, inscribe, paint, erect, or affix any signs, advertisements, notices, or other lettering ("Signs") at, on, or about the Premises, or any part thereof, without the Director's prior written approval. City may require Lessee to remove, repaint, or repair any Signs allowed. If Lessee does not remove, repaint, or repair the Signs within ten (10) days of Director's written demand, City may do or cause the work to be done, and Lessee will pay City's costs within thirty (30) days of receipt of Director's invoice. If payment is not timely made, the City may terminate this Lease upon ten (10) days written notice to Lessee. Alternatively, City may elect to terminate this Lease after ten (10) days written notice to Lessee. (B) Section 19. Sublease and Assignment. Lessee understands and agrees that Lessee shall not sublease the Premises or any part thereof without obtaining the prior written consent of the City. Lessee shall not, in whole or in part, assign or transfer directly or indirectly this Lease unless prior written approval has been obtained from the City. Written consent or approval shall not be unreasonably withheld by Lessor. Section 20. Default. 9 (A) The following constitute Events of Default under this Lease: failure to keep, perform, and observe any other promises, covenants and conditions contained in this Lease. (B) Upon the occurrence of any Event of Default, the City may, at its option, in addition to any other remedy or right given hereunder or by law, give notice to Lessee that this Lease terminates upon the date specified in the notice, which date will be no earlier than thirty (30) days after the giving of such notice. Section 21. No debts. Lessee shall not incur any debts or obligations on the credit of the City during the term of this Lease. Section 22. Notice. (A) All notices, demands, requests or replies provided for or permitted under this Lease by either party must be in writing and must be delivered by one of the following methods: (i) by personal delivery; or (ii) by deposit with the United States Postal Service as certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid. (B) Notice deposited with the United States Postal Service in the manner described above will be deemed effective two (2) business days after deposit with the United States Postal Service. (C) All these communications must only be made to the following: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Park and Recreation Department P. O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 Attn: Director of Park and Recreation (D) IF TO LESSEE: Buccaneer Commission Attn: Executive Director P.O. Box 30404 Corpus Christi, TX 78463 Either party may change the address to which notice is sent by using a method set out above. Lessee shall notify the City of an address change within ten (10) days after the address is changed. Section 23. Nondiscrimination. Lessee covenants and agrees that it shall not unreasonably discriminate nor permit discrimination against any person or group of persons, with regard to employment and the provision of services at, on, or in the Premises, on the grounds of race, religion, 10 national origin, marital status, sex, age, disability, or in any manner prohibited by the laws of the United States or the State of Texas. The City hereby reserves the right to take such action as the United States may direct to enforce this covenant. Section 24. Modifications. No changes or modifications to this Lease may be made, nor any provisions waived, unless the change or modification is made in writing and signed by persons authorized to sign agreements on behalf of each party. Section 25. Force Majeure. No party to this Lease shall be liable for delays or failures in performance due to any cause beyond their control including, without limitation, any delays or failures in performance caused by strikes, lock outs, fires, acts of God or the public enemy, common carrier, severe inclement weather, riots or interference by civil or military authorities. These delays or failures to perform shall extend the period of performance until these exigencies have been removed. Section 26. Surrender. Lessee acknowledges and understands that the lease of the Premises to Lessee is expressly conditioned on the understanding that the Premises must be surrendered, upon the expiration, termination, or cancellation of this Lease, in as good a condition as received, reasonable use and wear, acts of God, fire and flood damage or destruction where Lessee is without fault, excepted. Any reasonable costs incurred for repairs or corrections for which Lessee is responsible under this Lease are payable by Lessee to City as additional rental on the next rental payment date, or within 30 days written demand. Section 27. Publication Costs. Lessee shall pay for the cost of publishing the Lease description and related ordinance, if required by the City Charter, in the legal section of the local newspaper. Section 28. Interpretation. This Lease will be interpreted according to the Texas laws that govern the interpretation of contracts. Venue lies in Nueces County, Texas, where this Lease was entered into and will be performed. Section 28. Captions. The captions utilized in this Lease are for convenience only and do not in any way limit or amplify the terms or provisions hereof. 11 Section 29. Casualty. if the Premises become damaged due to weather event, fire, or other natural or man- made disaster, such that the Premises are not deemed safe for occupation by the City Building Official, and repairs are not completed within 30 days of the event of disaster, then either party may terminate this lease upon 30 days written notice to the other party, without penalty. Section 30. Removal of Property upon Termination. It is Lessee's responsibility to remove its personal property from the Premises prior to termination or expiration of the Lease. Lessee agrees that any of personal property remaining on the Premises after the termination or expiration of the Lease automatically becomes City property without any notice, action, or process of law, for disposition by the City as City deems appropriate in City Manager sole discretion, with no compensation to Lessee. Lessee shall be invoiced for City's costs to remove property from the Premises after termination or expiration of the Lease, and Lessee shall pay said invoice within thirty (30) days of receipt. Section 31. Entirety Clause. This Lease and the incorporated and attached exhibits constitute the entire agreement between the City and Lessee for the purpose granted. All other agreements, promises, representations, and understandings, oral or otherwise, with reference to the subject matter hereof, unless contained in this Lease are expressly revoked, as the parties intend to provide for a complete understanding within the provisions of this Lease and its exhibits of the terms, conditions, promises, and covenants relating to Lessee's operations and the Premises to be used in the operations. Section 32. Severability. (A) If, for any reason, any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, provision, phrase, or word of this Lease or the application hereof to any person or circumstance is, to any extent, held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future law or by a final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, then the remainder of this Lease, or the application of said term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, for it is the definite intent of the parties to this Lease that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, provision, phrase or word hereof be given full force and effect for its purpose. (B) To the extent that any clause or provision is held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future law effective during the term of this Lease, then the remainder of this Lease is not affected thereby, and in lieu of each such illegal, invalid, or unenforceable clause or provision, a clause or provision, as similar in terms to such illegal, invalid, or unenforceable clause or provision as may be 12 possible and be legal, valid and enforceable, will be added to this Lease automatically by the Court construing such clause or provision to be invalid. EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE, each of which shall be considered an original, on the day of , 2017. ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta Margie C. Rose City Secretary City Manager LESSEE: BUCCA R COMMISSION By: Name: JOH1Vt'I 1NILIIPE � e4Es inf 6F'Q Title: Date: E 13 I Lot 3 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM this day of , 2017. By: Lisa Aguilar Assistant City Attorney for City Attorney 13 EXHIBIT B INSURANCE LESSEE AND LESSE'S CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY INSURANCE A. Lessee and Lessee's contractor must not commence work under this agreement until all insurance required has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Contractor must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. 13. Lessee and Lessee's Contractor must furnish to the City's Risk Manager and Director of Parks and Recreation Department, 2 copies of Certificates of Insurance (COI) with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies, and a waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with COL Project name and or number must be listed in Description Box of COL TYPE OF INSURANCE 30 -written day notice of cancellation, required on all certificates or by applicable policy endorsements Commercial General Liability including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises — Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non -Owned 3. Rented/Leased MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit WORKERS' COMPENSATION EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY Statutory $500,000 /$500,000 /$500,000 14 C. In the event of accidents of any kind related to this lease agreement, Lessee and Lesse's Contractor must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. II. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Applicable for paid employees, Lessee and Lessee's Contractor must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers' compensation coverage provided must be in an amount sufficient to assure that all workers' compensation obligations incurred by the Lessee and Lessee's Contractor will be promptly met. B. Lessee and Lessee's Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Lessee and Lessee's Contractor's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. C. Lessee and Lessee's Contractor shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change, Lessee and Lessee's Contractor shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 D. Lessee and Lessee's Contractor agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • List the City and its officers, officials, employees, volunteers, and elected representatives as additional insured by endorsement, as respects operations, completed operation and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; • Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and 15 • Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation, non -renewal or material change in coverage, and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. E. Within five (5) calendar days of a suspension, cancellation, or non -renewal of coverage, Lessee and Lessee's Contractor shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Lessee and Lessee's Contractor's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. F. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Lessee and Lesseee's Contractor's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Lessee and Lessee's Contractor to stop work hereunder, until Lessee and Lessee's Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. G. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Lessee and Lessee's Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Lessee and Lessee's Contractor's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this agreement. H. It is agreed that Lessee and Lessee's Contractor's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this agreement. L It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. 2 t? cl Q o. rn City of Corpus Christi EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Corpus Christi Code § 2-349, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See next page for Filing Requirements, Certification and Definitions. COMPANY NAME: STREET ADDRESS: P.O. BOX: ....Ott Ott y CITY: Cafw CH &% s rt STATE: }\" ZIP: � 4 G gUi CG/ t' rR (o,'csV FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 1K 2. Partnership ❑ 3. Sole Owner ❑ 4. Association ❑ 5. Other ❑ if additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Job Title and City Department (if known) 2, State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Title 3. State the names of each "board member' of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Board, Commission or Committee 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Consultant FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)]. CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that i have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested, and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, as changes occur. Certifying Person: Signature of Certifying Person: Title: Date: DEFINITIONS PAivM -Ct o \ led -) a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee of the city, including the board of any corporation created by the city. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the city, whether under civil service or not, including part- time employees and employees of any corporation created by the city. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements. "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. g• Tex Mex Railroad Depot 1823 Chaparral St. https google.com .r.xcs _.- '''91293,97 3961043,48, data= lang!le3 p -GC Google Maps o x . Frle Edit View Fasorites Tools Help Log In Laserfiche Forms Gateway Printing - office ... j Google Parks & Recreation OlInfor Google Maps Facilities Management W... - ® - - Page Safety . Tools �� » AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading Item for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 Second Reading Item for the City Council Meeting of January 31, 2017 DATE: TO: January 3, 2017 Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Stacie Talbert Anaya, Interim Director, Parks and Recreation Department StacieT@cctexas.com 361-826-3460 Short term Lease Agreement with the Buccaneer Commission for the Tex-Mex Railroad Depot CAPTION: Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a short-term lease agreement with Buccaneer Commission for the use of Tex Mex Railroad Depot located at 1800 block of Chaparral Street, in consideration of rental payments of $600 per month, not to exceed six months. PURPOSE: Short term lease the Tex Mex Railroad Depot to the Buccaneer Commission for office space for its operations and coordination of the Buc Days Festival, Parade, Rodeo and other community- wide events. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The long-term lease for the Tex Mex Railroad Depot to the Buccaneer Commission requires a 28 -delay between readings then a 61 day delay before the lease is executed. This short term lease will allow the Commission to move into the depot and settle in before the 2017 Buc Days Festival begins. The Buccaneer Commission has leased the Jalufka-Gavatos House located in Heritage Park for since 2006 for a monthly payment of $400. This has been a very good partnership for the Parks & Recreation Department and the City as a whole. The Commission, however, has outgrown the space and needs additional room to host event planning meetings, workshops and other gatherings. A five-year lease with the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce prior to their merger with the Corpus Christi Chamber of Commerce (United Chamber of Commerce — now) was executed for the Tex- Mex Railroad Depot in January 2015. The Chambers officially vacated the Depot in early January 2017. ALTERNATIVES: Do not approve the short term lease for the Tex-Mex Railroad Depot. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: City Council must approve all lease agreements. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating Revenue ❑ Capital X Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016- 2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered/ Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): General Fund Comments: As the revenue for the lease of this facility is already included in the FY2017 operating budget, no additional impact is anticipated. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the short term lease of the Tex-Mex Railroad Depot to the Buccaneer Commission LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Proposed Lease Agreement Lease Agreement Exhibit A Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a short-term lease agreement with Buccaneer Commission for the use of Tex Mex Railroad Depot located at 1800 block of Chaparral Street, in consideration of rental payments of $600 per month, not to exceed six months Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas: SECTION 1. That the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute a short-term lease agreement with the Buccaneer Commission for the use of Tex Mex Railroad Depot located at 1800 block of Chaparral Street, in consideration of rental payments of $600 per month, not to exceed six months. A copy of the Agreement is on file with the City Secretary. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Dan McQueen Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Joe McComb That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Dan McQueen Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Joe McComb PASSED AND APPROVED, this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Dan McQueen Mayor 1 SHORT-TERM LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND BUCCANEER COMMISSION STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF NUECES § This lease agreement ("Lease") is entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation ("City"), acting through its duly authorized City Manager, or his designee ("City Manager"), and the Corpus Christi Buccaneer Commission ("Lessee"). WHEREAS, the City is the owner of real property known as the Tex-Mex Railroad Depot located at 1823 Chaparral, Corpus Christi Texas, together with all improvements thereon ("Premises"); WHEREAS, Lessee has requested the use of the Premises for the purpose of office space for its operations as the Buccaneer Commission, upon the conditions and covenants contained in this Lease; and, WHEREAS, City desires to allow Lessee to use the Premises for this purpose. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Lessee, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, agree as follows: Section 1 Definitions. (A) City means the City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas, a home rule municipal corporation. (B) City Manager means the City's City Manager or the City Manager's designee. (C) Director means the City's Director of Park and Recreation or the Director of Park and Recreation's designee. (D) Lease means this lease document, including all attached and incorporated exhibits. (E) Lessee means Buccaneer Commission. (F) Parks means the City's Park and Recreation Department. (G) Premises means the Tex-Mex Railroad Depot located at 1823 Chaparral, Corpus Christi Texas, together with all improvements thereon, including parking spaces, as depicted on the attached and incorporated Exhibit A. However, the 2 parking spaces will be available for general public use after Lessee's regular office hours. Section 2. Purpose. The purpose of this Lease, between City and Lessee, is to enable Lessee to utilize Premises for office space for its day-to-day nonprofit corporation operations. Lessee shall not operate the Premises for any other purpose without Director's prior written approval. Section 3. Term. The City leases the Premises, subject to all terms and conditions of this Lease, to the Lessee on a month-to-month basis for up to six months, unless sooner terminated as set out herein. This short-term Lease automatically terminates upon the effective date of a longer term multi-year lease between the parties. Section 4. Acceptance of Premises Disclaimer: A. LESSEE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT IS LEASING THE PREMISES "AS IS" WITH ALL FAULTS AS MAY EXIST ON THE PREMISES, AND THAT NEITHER LESSOR, NOR ANY EMPLOYEE OR AGENT OF LESSOR, HAS MADE ANY REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES AS TO THE CONDITION OF SUCH PREMISES. LESSEE HEREBY WAIVES ANY AND ALL CAUSES OF ACTION, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, AND DAMAGES BASED ON ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF SUITABILITY FOR APARTICULAR PURPOSE, ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES OF HABITABILITY, AND ANY OTHER IMPLIED WARRANTIES NOT EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS LEASE. B. LESSEE ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT LESSEE HAS BEEN PROVIDED, TO ITS SATISFACTION, THE OPPORTUNITY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES FOR ANY DEFECTS AS TO THE SUITABILITY OF SUCH PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE TO WHICH LESSEE INTENDS TO USE THE PREMISES, AND IS RELYING ON ITS OWN INSPECTION. C. LESSEE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT ANY AND ALL STRUCTURES AND IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING ON THE PREMISES ON THE COMMENCEMENT DATE, IF ANY, ARE ACCEPTED "AS IS" WITH ANY AND ALL LATENT AND PATENT DEFECTS AND THAT THERE ARE NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, BY LESSOR WITH RESPECT THERETO. LESSEE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT 1T I5 NOT RELYING UPON ANY REPRESENTATION, STATEMENT OR OTHER ASSERTION BY LESSOR WITH RESPECT TO ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES OR IMPROVEMENTS, BUT IS RELYING ON ITS EXAMINATION THEREOF. D. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS Section 4 SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS LEASE. 3 Section 5. Lease Payments. (A) For and in consideration of the rights and privileges herein granted, Lessee agrees to pay the City, as follows monthly rents as follows: $600 per month (B) All rental fees are due and payable on or before the 10th day of each month for the term of this Lease. Payment must be made to the order of the City of Corpus Christi and mailed to the City Collections Department, P. O. Box 9257, Corpus Christi, TX, 78469, or delivered to City Hall at 1201 Leopard Street, Corpus Christi, TX, 78401. Section 6. Construction of Improvements. Prior to commencing any work at the Premises, Lessee shall coordinate with the Director of Parks and Recreation to verify that Lessee has sufficient funds on hand to complete the planned improvements, ("Improvements"), will comply with City permitting process, and will obtain prior approval from the Director of Parks and Recreation regarding any work at the Premises. Lessee shall require the contractors who are awarded contracts for construction of the Improvements to furnish the following bonds by surety companies authorized to do business in Texas: Payment Bond — A payment bond in the amount of One Hundred Percent of the contract shall be furnished for the protection of all persons, firms, and corporations who may furnish materials or perform labor. The payment bond shall be made with City as an obligee, However, this requirement does not apply if the amount of the construction contract is $25,000 or less. Performance Bond. A performance bond in the amount of One Hundred Percent of the contract shall be furnished covering the faithful performance of the contract. The performance bond shall be made with City as an obligee. However, this requirement does not apply if the amount of the construction contract is $50,000 or less. Lessee shall include in all construction contracts for the Improvements, in large, bold face text: "Contractor does hereby agree to release, indemnify, defend and hold harmless City of Corpus Christi, and all of its officials, officers, agents and employees, in both their public and private capacities, from and against any and all liability, claims, losses, damages, suits, demands or causes of action including all expenses of litigation and/or settlement, court costs and attorney fees which may arise by reason of injury to or death of any person or for loss of, damage to, or loss of use of any property occasioned by error, omission, or negligent act of contractor, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, invitees or any other person arising out of or in connection with the performance of the construction 4 contract, and contractor shall at his or her own cost and expense defend and protect the City of Corpus Christi from any and all such claims and demands." Lessee shall also require the contractors in all construction agreements for the Improvements to furnish insurance in such amounts as specified in Exhibit B. Lessee agrees that the Director of Engineering Services or designee, as well as the Director of Parks and Recreation or designee, will make visits to the Premises at intervals appropriate to the various stages of construction, as they deem necessary. Lessee agrees that the Director of Engineering Services or designee will have the authority to reject Work believed to be defective. Lessee agrees to promptly correct all defective work. Lessee agrees that all work performed shall be done in full compliance and in accordance with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations, including but not limited to the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines and such work shall be subject to City inspection during the performance thereof and after it is completed. Lessee shall discharge all obligations to contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, workmen and/or other persons for all work performed and for materials furnished for or on account of Lessee as such obligations mature. Lessee expressly agrees that it will neither give nor grant, nor purport to give or grant any mechanic's or materialmen's lien upon the City's property or upon any Improvements thereupon in the process of construction or repair, nor allow any condition to exist or situation to develop whereby any party should be entitled, as a matter of law, to a mechanic's or materialmen's lien against the City's property or the Improvements thereon, and Lessee will discharge any such lien within thirty (30) days after notice of filing thereof. Lessee shall conduct its operations under this Agreement in an orderly and proper manner, considering the nature of such operation, so as not to unreasonably annoy, disturb, or endanger others. The complete cost of developing all necessary plans and specifications, as provided in this Agreement, and the cost of construction of the Improvements shall be borne solely by the Lessee at no expense to the City whatsoever. Lessee shall pay all taxes, special assessments, or levies, if any, assessed against the Premises or Improvements. Upon completion of the Improvements, Lessee shall donate them to the City upon acceptance by the City Director of Parks and Recreation. Any warranties given to Lessee regarding the Improvements shall be transferred and assigned to the City at the same time as the Improvements are accepted by the City. Section 7. Utilitkes. 5 (A) Lessee shall be responsible to obtain and pay for all utilities to the Premises, including but not limited to, telephone, internet, electricity, water, wastewater, and solid waste. (B) Lessee shall pay for all utilities related to usage of Premises prior to the due date. Failure to pay any utility bill(s) prior to the due date constitutes grounds for termination of this Lease. Section 8. Abandonment, Interruption of Utilities, Removal of Lessee's Property, and Lockout. Chapter 93 of the Texas Property Code governs the rights and obligations of the parties with regard to: (a) abandonment of the leased premises; (b) interruption of utilities; (c) removal of Lessee's personal property; and (d) lock out of Lessee. Section 9. Maintenance. During the term of this Lease, Lessee will repair and maintain, at its sole expense, the Premises and any improvements on the Premises including without limitation all fixtures connected therewith, and all personal property thereon. However, the City shall be responsible for repairs to the HVAC system and repairs to the roof, subject to provisions of Section 29 and subject to availability and appropriation of funds. City has no obligation for such repairs if funds are not budgeted and appropriated for such purpose during the annual City budget process. Lessee shall obtain, at its own expense, all required building permits, ail utility services, garbage collection, janitorial services, and similar services. Section 10. Furniture, Fixtures, Equipment and Parking. (A) It is understood that Lessee will be responsible for furnishing and equipping the Premises and that the City has no obligation to furnish any equipment or furnishings for Lessee. All capital construction to the premises, such as installation of electrical or plumbing fixtures, remains the property of the City. (C) Lessee may place signage for the reserved parking spaces shown on the attached Exhibit A to indicate that the parking spaces are reserved for Lessee during its business hours and during Buc Days events. (B) Section 11. City Use. City retains the right to use or cross the Premises with utility lines and easements. City may exercise these rights without compensation to Lessee for damages to the Premises from installing, maintaining, repairing, or removing the utility lines and easements. City must use reasonable judgment in locating the utility lines and easements to minimize damage to the Premises. 6 Section 12. Laws Affecting Operation of Premises and Performance. (A) Lessee shall ensure that its use of the Premises is in accordance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. (B) Lessee shall bear the expense and responsibility of meeting all requirements for acquiring all applicable licenses and permits related to its operations. Lessee shall also bear the expense of meeting and complying with all health regulations and Certificate of Occupancy requirements. Section 13. Inspection. Any officer or authorized employee of the City may enter upon the Premises, at all reasonable times and notice, to determine whether Lessee is providing maintenance in accordance with and as required by above, or for any other purpose incidental to City's retained rights of and in the Premises. Section 14. Relationship of Parties. This Lease establishes a landlord/tenant relationship, and none other, and this Lease must be construed conclusively in favor of that relationship. In performing this Lease, both City and Lessee will act in an individual capacity and not as agents, representatives, employees, employers, partners, joint venturers, or associates of one another. The employees or agents of either party shall not be, nor be construed to be, the employees or agents of the other party for any purpose whatsoever. Section 15. insurance. (A) Lessee shall secure and maintain at Lessee's expense, during the term of this Lease, insurance of the type and with the amount of coverage shown on the Exhibit "B", which is incorporated in this Lease by reference. (B) The Certificate of Insurance must be sent to the Risk Manager prior to occupancy of and operations at the Premises. Lessee agrees to notify Lessor of any substantive change to its insurance coverage. (C) Lessee shall provide, during the term of this Lease, copies of all insurance policies to the Risk Manager upon written request by the City Manager. The Risk Manager shall retain the right to annually review the amount and types of insurance maintained by Lessee, to require increased coverage limits, if reasonably necessary in the interest of public health, safety, or welfare, and to decrease coverage, if so warranted. (D) In the event of any necessary increase, Lessee shall receive ninety (90) days written notice prior to the effective date of the requirement to obtain increased coverage. In the event alcoholic beverages are to be served or consumed on any Premises covered by this Lease, the Lessee shall additionally obtain or cause to 7 be obtained alcoholic beverage liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) covering the event or time period when alcoholic beverages are to be served or consumed. (E) Lessee shall, prior to any addition or alteration to, in, on, or about the Premises, obtain prior clearance, in writing, from the Risk Manager that the proposed addition or alteration will not necessitate a change or modification in the existing insurance coverage maintained by Lessee. This clearance is in addition to the prior consent required by Section 6, as contained herein. (F) The City carries the property and flood insurance on the building. Lessee is responsible for insuring its own contents. Section '16. Indemnity. In consideration of allowing Lessee to use the Premises, Lessee ("Indemnitor") covenants to fully indemnify, save and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees (collectively, "Indemnitees") from and against any and all liability, loss, damages, claims, demands, suits, and causes of action of any nature whatsoever asserted against or recovered from City on account of injury or damage to person including, without limitation on the foregoing, premises defects, workers' compensation and death claims, or property loss or damage of any other kind whatsoever, to the extent any injury, damage, or loss may be incident to, arise out of, be caused by, or be in any way connected with, either proximately or remotely, wholly or in part: (1) Lessee's performance pursuant to this Lease; (2) Lessee's use of the Premises and any and all activities associated therewith pursuant to this Lease; (3) the violation by Lessee, its officers, employees, agents, or representatives or by Indemnitees or any of them, of any law, rule, regulation, ordinance, or government order of any kind pertaining, directly or indirectly, to this Lease; (4) the exercise of rights under this Lease; or (5) an act or omission on the part of Lessee, its officers, employees, agents, or representatives or of Indemnitees, or any of them, pertaining to this Lease, regardless of whether the injury, damage, loss, violation, exercise of rights, act or omission is caused or is claimed to be caused by the contributing or concurrent negligence of Indemnitees, or any of them, but not if caused by the sole negligence of Indemnitees, or any of them, unmixed with the fault of any other person or entity and including all expenses of litigation, court costs, and attorneys' fees, which arise, or are claimed to arise, out of or in connection with the asserted or recovered incident. Lessee covenants and agrees that, if City is made a party to any litigation against Lessee or in any litigation commenced by any party, other than Lessee relating to this Lease, Lessee shall, upon receipt of reasonable notice regarding commencement of litigation, at its own expense, investigate all claims and demands, attend to their settlement or other disposition, defend City in all actions based thereon with legal counsel satisfactory to City, and pay al! charges of attorneys and all other costs and expenses of any kind whatsoever arising from any said liability, injury, damage, loss, demand, claim or action. 8 Such indemnity provisions contained in this Section 16 herein apply to the extent insurance (as approved by City in Section 15) may apply for protection of the City and Lessee. Section 17. Alterations. (A) Lessee agrees not to harm the Premises beyond normal wear and tear. B) All alterations, improvements, and additions made by the Lessee upon said Premises, which are permanent in nature, even if made at Lessee's own expense, shall, if not removed by Lessee at any termination or cancellation hereof, become the property of the City in fee simple without any other action or process of law. Lessee agrees to be contractually and financially responsible for repairing any and all damage caused by such removal. If items are installed in such a manner as to become fixtures, such fixtures shall not be removed by Lessee upon termination and shall become the property of the City. Section 18. Signs. (A) Lessee shall not exhibit, inscribe, paint, erect, or affix any signs, advertisements, notices, or other lettering ("Signs") at, an, or about the Premises, or any part thereof, without the Director's prior written approval. (B) City may require Lessee to remove, repaint, or repair any Signs allowed. If Lessee does not remove, repaint, or repair the Signs within ten (10) days of Director's written demand, City may do or cause the work to be done, and Lessee will pay City's costs within thirty (30) days of receipt of Director's invoice. If payment is not timely made, the City may terminate this Lease upon ten (10) days written notice to Lessee. Alternatively, City may elect to terminate this Lease after ten (10) days written notice to Lessee. Section 19. Sublease and Assignment. Lessee understands and agrees that Lessee shall not sublease the Premises or any part thereof without obtaining the prior written consent of the City. Lessee shall not, in whole or in part, assign or transfer directly or indirectly this Lease unless prior written approval has been obtained from the City. Written consent or approval shall not be unreasonably withheld by Lessor. Section 20. Default. (A) The following constitute Events of Default under this Lease: failure to keep, perform, and observe any other promises, covenants and conditions contained in this Lease. 9 (B) Upon the occurrence of any Event of Default, the City may, at its option, in addition to any other remedy or right given hereunder or by law, give notice to Lessee that this Lease terminates upon the date specified in the notice, which date will be no earlier than thirty (30) days after the giving of such notice. Section 21. No debts. Lessee shall not incur any debts or obligations on the credit of the City during the term of this Lease. Section 22. Notice. (A) All notices, demands, requests or replies provided for or permitted under this Lease by either party must be in writing and must be delivered by one of the following methods: (i) by personal delivery; or (ii) by deposit with the United States Postal Service as certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid. Notice deposited with the United States Postal Service in the manner described above will be deemed effective two (2) business days after deposit with the United States Postal Service. (B) (C) All these communications must only be made to the following: IF TO CITY: IF TO LESSEE: City of Corpus Christi Park and Recreation Department P. O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 Attn: Director of Park and Recreation Buccaneer Commission Attn: Executive Director P.O. Box 30404 Corpus Christi, TX 78463 (D) Either party may change the address to which notice is sent by using a method set out above. Lessee shall notify the City of an address change within ten (10) days after the address is changed. Section 23. Nondiscrimination. Lessee covenants and agrees that it shall not unreasonably discriminate nor permit discrimination against any person or group of persons, with regard to employment and the provision of services at, on, or in the Premises, on the grounds of race, religion, national origin, marital status, sex, age, disability, or in any manner prohibited by the laws of the United States or the State of Texas. The City hereby reserves the right to take such action as the United States may direct to enforce this covenant. Section 24. Modifications. 10 No changes or modifications to this Lease may be made, nor any provisions waived, unless the change or modification is made in writing and signed by persons authorized to sign agreements on behalf of each party. Section 25. Force Majeure. No party to this Lease shall be liable for delays or failures in performance due to any cause beyond their control including, without limitation, any delays or failures in performance caused by strikes, lock outs, fires, acts of God or the public enemy, common carrier, severe inclement weather, riots or interference by civil or military authorities. These delays or failures to perform shall extend the period of performance until these exigencies have been removed. Section 26. Surrender. Lessee acknowledges and understands that the lease of the Premises to Lessee is expressly conditioned on the understanding that the Premises must be surrendered, upon the expiration, termination, or cancellation of this Lease, in as good a condition as received, reasonable use and wear, acts of God, fire and flood damage or destruction where Lessee is without fault, excepted. Any reasonable costs incurred for repairs or corrections for which Lessee is responsible under this Lease are payable by Lessee to City as additional rental on the next rental payment date, or within 30 days written demand. Section 27. Publication Costs. Lessee shall pay for the cost of publishing the Lease description and related ordinance, if required by the City Charter, in the legal section of the local newspaper. Section 28. Interpretation. This Lease will be interpreted according to the Texas laws that govern the interpretation of contracts. Venue lies in Nueces County, Texas, where this Lease was entered into and will be performed. Section 28. Captions. The captions utilized in this Lease are for convenience only and do not in any way limit or amplify the terms or provisions hereof. Section 29. Casualty. If the Premises become damaged due to weather event, fire, or other natural or man- made disaster, such that the Premises are not deemed safe for occupation by the City Building Official, and repairs are not completed within 30 days of the event of disaster, 11 then either party may terminate this lease upon 30 days written notice to the other party, without penalty. Section 30. Removal of Property upon Termination. It is Lessee's responsibility to remove its personal property from the Premises prior to termination or expiration of the Lease. Lessee agrees that any of personal property remaining on the Premises after the termination or expiration of the Lease automatically becomes City property without any notice, action, or process of law, for disposition by the City as City deems appropriate in City Manager sole discretion, with no compensation to Lessee. Lessee shall be invoiced for City's costs to remove property from the Premises after termination or expiration of the Lease, and Lessee shall pay said invoice within thirty (30) days of receipt. Section 31. Entirety Clause. This Lease and the incorporated and attached exhibits constitute the entire agreement between the City and Lessee for the purpose granted. All other agreements, promises, representations, and understandings, oral or otherwise, with reference to the subject matter hereof, unless contained in this Lease are expressly revoked, as the parties intend to provide for a complete understanding within the provisions of this Lease and its exhibits of the terms, conditions, promises, and covenants relating to Lessee's operations and the Premises to be used in the operations. Section 32. Severability. (A) If, for any reason, any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, provision, phrase, or word of this Lease or the application hereof to any person or circumstance is, to any extent, held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future law or by a final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, then the remainder of this Lease, or the application of said term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, for it is the definite intent of the parties to this Lease that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, provision, phrase or word hereof be given full force and effect for its purpose. (B) To the extent that any clause or provision is held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future law effective during the term of this Lease, then the remainder of this Lease is not affected thereby, and in lieu of each such illegal, invalid, or unenforceable clause or provision, a clause or provision, as similar in terms to such illegal, invalid, or unenforceable clause or provision as may be possible and be legal, valid and enforceable, will be added to this Lease automatically by the Court construing such clause or provision to be invalid. EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE, each of which shall be considered an original, on the day of , 2017. ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta Margie C. Rose City Secretary City Manager LESSEE: BUCC ER COMMI ION By: Name: 014"4"-1 911iU#?9 Title: 7i'lltn oIa r 4— ( ao 12 Date: ? 1 17 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM this day of , 2017. By: Lisa Aguilar Assistant City Attorney for City Attorney 13 EXHIBIT B INSURANCE I. LESSEE AND LESSE'S CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY INSURANCE A. Lessee and Lessee's contractor must not commence work under this agreement until all insurance required has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Contractor must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained, B. Lessee and Lessee's Contractor must furnish to the City's Risk Manager and Director of Parks and Recreation Department, 2 copies of Certificates of Insurance (COI) with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies, and a waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with COL Project name and or number must be listed in Description Box of COL TYPE OF INSURANCE 30 -written day notice of cancellation, required on all certificates or by applicable policy endorsements Commercial General Liability including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury AUTO LIABILITY (including) l , Owned 2. Hired and Non -Owned 3. Rented/Leased WORKERS' COMPENSATION EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit Statutory $500,000 /$500,0001$500,000 14 C. In the event of accidents of any kind related to this lease agreement, Lessee and Lesse's Contractor must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. II. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Applicable for paid employees, Lessee and Lessee's Contractor must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers' compensation coverage provided must be in an amount sufficient to assure that all workers' compensation obligations incurred by the Lessee and Lessee's Contractor will be promptly met. B. Lessee and Lessee's Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Lessee and Lessee's Contractor's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII, C. Lessee and Lessee's Contractor shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Lessee and Lessee's Contractor shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 D. Lessee and Lessee's Contractor agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • List the City and its officers, officials, employees, volunteers, and elected representatives as additional insured by endorsement, as respects operations, completed operation and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; • Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and 15 • Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation, non -renewal or material change in coverage, and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. E. Within five (5) calendar days of a suspension, cancellation, or non -renewal of coverage, Lessee and Lessee's Contractor shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Lessee and Lessee's Contractor's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. F. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Lessee and Lesseee's Contractor's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Lessee and Lessee's Contractor to stop work hereunder, until Lessee and Lessee's Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. G. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Lessee and Lessee's Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Lessee and Lessee's Contractor's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this agreement. II. It is agreed that Lessee and Lessee's Contractor's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this agreement. I. It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. Tex Mex Railroad Depot 1823 Chaparral St. https google.com .r.xcs _.- '''91293,97 3961043,48, data= lang!le3 p -GC Google Maps o x . Frle Edit View Fasorites Tools Help Log In Laserfiche Forms Gateway Printing - office ... j Google Parks & Recreation OlInfor Google Maps Facilities Management W... - ® - - Page Safety . Tools �� » AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of January 31, 2017 DATE: January 24, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Stacie Talbert Anaya, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation StacieT(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-3476 Maria Pedraza, Procurement Manager mariape(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-3176 Mowing of Storm Water and Street Right -of -Ways CAPTION: Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a service agreement with 2Chainz Brush Clearing, LLC of Lolita, Texas, for mowing of storm water and street right- of-way, in accordance with Request for Bids No. 165, based on the lowest, responsive, responsible bid for a total amount not to exceed $367,772.00, with an estimated expenditure of $245,181.33 in FY2016-2017. The term of this contract will be for 12 months with options to extend for two additional 12 -month periods, subject to the mutual consent of the City Manager and the contractor. PURPOSE: This service agreement will provide mowing services of storm water and street right-of- ways for locations throughout the city. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Award recommendation is based on responsive and responsible bids. These contract locations include high profile areas, right of ways and drainage ditches. A list of locations in this contract is included for review. Bidders for these areas must have experience working in drainage conveyance systems. Currently, these locations are being serviced by a contractor, Brown Mule Mowing, Inc., whose contract extensions have expired or are about to expire. The cost for the Parks & Recreation Department to execute the same or similar work with in-house crews would be $436,051.47, of which $242,362.00 would be for ditch right of ways, and $193,689.47 for street right of ways. In this case, it is beneficial for the City to contract out these mowing parcels. The department currently does not have the appropriate staffing level or equipment to maintain the additional acreage. ALTERNATIVES: If not approved, the department will need to hire additional mowing crews to address these areas or compromise established levels of services throughout the community. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This purchase conforms to the City's purchasing policies and procedures and State statutes regulating procurement. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Park and Recreation FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $920,421.68 $122,590.67 $1,043,012.35 Encumbered / Expended Amount $602,019.93 $0.00 $602,019.93 This item $245,181.33 $122,590.67 $367,772.00 BALANCE $73,220.42 $0.00 $73,220.42 Fund(s): Storm Water Comments: The initial contract term is a total amount not to exceed $367,772, with an estimated expenditure of $245,181.33 is funded in FY2016-2017. The total contract value will be $1,103,316.00 if all option years are executed RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Service Agreement Bid Tabulation City of Corpus Christi Purchasing Division Buyer: Michael Gutierrez BID EVENT No. 165 Mowing of Storm Water and Right -of -Ways BID TABULATION DESCRIPTION ACRES CYCLES *Charlton Holding, LLC Corpus Christi, TX Bonco, LLC Driscoll, TX Brown Mule Mowing, Inc Corpus Christi, TX 2Chainz Brush Clearing, LLC Lolita, TX UNIT PRICE PER CYCLE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE PER CYCLE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE PER CYCLE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE PER CYCLE TOTAL PRICE Street Right -of -Ways 551.759 8 no bid no bid $30,346.75 $242,774.00 $24,211.19 $193,689.52 $19,311.00 $154,488.00 Storm Water Drainage 226.9 4 no bid no bid $60,128.50 $240,514.00 $55,624.54 $222,498.16 $53,321.00 $213,284.00 TOTAL no bid $483,288.00 $416,187.68 $367,772.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT NO. 799 Mowing of Storm Water and Street Right -of -Ways THIS Mowing of Storm Water and Street Right -of -Ways Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation ("City") and 2Chainz Brush Clearing, LLC. ("Contractor"), effective upon execution by the City Manager or the City Manager's designee ("City Manager"). WHEREAS, Contractor has bid to provide Mowing of Storm Water and Street Right -of -Ways in response to Request for Bid/Proposal No. 165 ("RFB/RFP"), which RFB/RFP includes the required scope of work and all specifications and which RFB/RFP and the Contractor's bid or proposal response, as applicable, are incorporated by reference in this Agreement as Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively, as if each were fully set out here in its entirety. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Contractor agree as follows: 1. Scope. Contractor will provide Mowing of Storm Water and Street Right -of - Ways ("Services") in accordance with the attached Scope of Work, as shown in Attachment A, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety, and in accordance with Exhibit 2. 2. Term. This Agreement is for 12 months, with performance commencing upon the date of issuance of a notice to proceed from the Contract Administrator or Purchasing Division. This Agreement includes an option to extend the term for up to two additional 12 -month periods ("Option Period"), provided, the parties do so prior to expiration of the original term or the then -current Option Period. The decision to exercise the option to extend the term of this Agreement is, at all times, within the sole discretion of the City and is conditioned upon the prior written agreement of the Contractor and the City Manager. 3. Compensation and Payment. The total value of this Agreement is not to exceed $367,772.00, subject to approved extensions and changes. Payment will be made for Services completed and accepted by the City within 30 days of acceptance, subject to receipt of an acceptable invoice. All pricing must be in accordance with the attached Bid/Pricing Schedule, as shown in City of Corpus Christi Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1 /16 Page 1 of 8 Attachment B, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 4. Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this Agreement, including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for payment. The City's Contract Administrator for this Agreement is as follows: Tessy Gonzalez Parks and Recreation Phone: 361-826-3493 Email: TessyG@cctexas.com 5. Insurance; Bonds. (A) Before performance can begin under this Agreement, the Contractor must deliver a certificate of insurance ("COI"), as proof of the required insurance coverages, to the City's Risk Manager and the Contract Administrator. Additionally, the COI must state that the City will be given at least 30 days' advance written notice of cancellation, material change in coverage, or intent not to renew any of the policies. The City must be named as an additional insured. The City Attorney must be given copies of all insurance policies within 10 days of the City Manager's written request. Insurance requirements are as stated in Attachment C, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. (B) In the event a payment bond, a performance bond, or both, are required of the Contractor to be provided to the City under this Agreement before performance can commence, the terms, conditions, and amounts required in the bonds and appropriate surety information are as included in the RFB/RFP or as may be added to Attachment C, and such content is incorporated here in this Agreement by reference as if each bond's terms, conditions, and amounts were fully set out here in its entirety. 6. Purchase Release Order. For multiple -release purchases of Services to be provided by the Contractor over a period of time, the City will exercise its right to specify time, place and quantity of Services to be delivered in the following manner: any City department or division may send to Contractor a purchase release order signed by an authorized agent of the department or division. The purchase release order must refer to this Agreement, and City of Corpus Christi Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1 /16 Page 2 of 8 Services will not be rendered until the Contractor receives the signed purchase release order. 7. Inspection and Acceptance. Any Services that are provided but not accepted by the City must be corrected or re -worked immediately at no charge to the City. If immediate correction or re -working at no charge cannot be made by the Contractor, a replacement service may be procured by the City on the open market and any costs incurred, including additional costs over the item's bid/proposal price, must be paid by the Contractor within 30 days of receipt of City's invoice. 8. Warranty. The Contractor warrants that all products supplied under this Agreement are new, quality items that are free from defects, fit for their intended purpose, and of good material and workmanship. The Contractor warrants that it has clear title to the products and that the products are free of liens or encumbrances. In addition, the products purchased under this Agreement shall be warranted by the Contractor or, if indicated in Attachment D by the manufacturer, for the period stated in Attachment D. Attachment D is attached to this Agreement and is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 9. Quality/Quantity Adjustments. Any Service quantities indicated on the Bid/Pricing Schedule are estimates only and do not obligate the City to order or accept more than the City's actual requirements nor do the estimates restrict the City from ordering less than its actual needs during the term of the Agreement and including any Option Period. Substitutions and deviations from the City's product requirements or specifications are prohibited without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator. 10. Non -Appropriation. The continuation of this Agreement after the close of any fiscal year of the City, which fiscal year ends on September 30th annually, is subject to appropriations and budget approval specifically covering this Agreement as an expenditure in said budget, and it is within the sole discretion of the City's City Council to determine whether or not to fund this Agreement. The City does not represent that this budget item will be adopted, as said determination is within the City Council's sole discretion when adopting each budget. 11. Independent Contractor. Contractor will perform the work required by this Agreement as an independent contractor and will furnish such Services in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances or conditions will any agent, servant or employee of the Contractor be considered an employee of the City. City of Corpus Christi Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Page 3 of 8 12. Subcontractors. Contractor may use subcontractors in connection with the work performed under this Agreement. When using subcontractors, however, the Contractor must obtain prior written approval from the Contract Administrator if the subcontractors were not named at the time of bid or proposal, as applicable. In using subcontractors, the Contractor is responsible for all their acts and omissions to the same extent as if the subcontractor and its employees were employees of the Contractor. All requirements set forth as part of this Agreement, including the necessity of providing a COI in advance to the City, are applicable to all subcontractors and their employees to the same extent as if the Contractor and its employees had performed the work. 13. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by written change order signed by both parties. Change orders may be used to modify quantities as deemed necessary by the City. 14. Waiver. No waiver by either party of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement waives any subsequent breach of the same. 15. Taxes. The Contractor covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment taxes and all other related taxes. Upon request, the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of these taxes within 15 days of such request. 16. Notice. Any notice required under this Agreement must be given by fax, hand delivery, or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is deemed received on the day faxed or hand -delivered or on the third day after postmark if sent by certified mail. Notice must be sent as follows: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Tessy Gonzalez Title: Contract Administrator Address: 1201 Leopard St. Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Fax: 361-826-3864 IF TO CONTRACTOR: 2Chainz Brush Clearing, LLC. Attn: Joe Chaney Title: Owner Address: 305 CR 4291, Lolita, Texas 77971 Fax: 361-920-1383 City of Corpus Christi Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1 /16 Page 4 of 8 17. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS ("INDEMNITEES') FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER ON ACCOUNT OF PERSONAL INJURIES (INCLUDING DEATH AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS), PROPERTY LOSS OR DAMAGE, OR ANY OTHER KIND OF INJURY, LOSS, OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES WHICH ARISE OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEEMENT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE INJURIES, DEATH OR DAMAGES ARE CAUSED OR ARE CLAIMED TO BE CAUSED BY THE CONCURRENT OR CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES, BUT NOT IF BY THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES UNMIXED WITH THE FAULT OF ANY OTHER PERSON. CONTRACTOR MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, INVESTIGATE ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ANY KIND ARISING FROM ANY SAID LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AG REEM ENT. 18. Termination. (A) The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Contractor's failure to perform the work specified in this Agreement or to keep any required insurance policies in force during the entire term of this Agreement. The Contract Administrator must give the Contractor written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Contractor has not cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. City of Corpus Christi Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Page 5 of 8 (B) Alternatively, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 30 days advance written notice to the Contractor. The City Manager may also terminate this Agreement upon 24 hours written notice to the Contractor for failure to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes as set out in this Agreement. 19. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement by the Contractor, or of any right or interest contained herein, is effective unless the City Manager first gives written consent to such assignment. The performance of this Agreement by the Contractor is of the essence of this Agreement, and the City Manager's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City Manager on any ground whatsoever. 20. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is considered to be severable and, if, for any reason, any provision or part of this Agreement is determined to be invalid and contrary to applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of nor affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, but this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part had been omitted. 21. Order of Precedence. In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement, its attachments, and exhibits, such conflicts and inconsistencies will be resolved by reference to the documents in the following order of priority: A. this Agreement and its attachments B. the bid solicitation document, including addenda (Exhibit 1) C. the Contractor's bid response (Exhibit 2) 22. Certificate of Interested Parties. Contractor agrees to comply with Texas Government Code Section 2252.908, as it may be amended, and to complete Form 1295 "Certificate of Interested Parties" as part of this Agreement. 23. Governing Law. This Agreement is subject to all federal, State, and local laws, rules, and regulations. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of the State of Texas, and such form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district, county, or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas. 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes City of Corpus Christi Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Page 6 of 8 all prior negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, either oral or written, between the parties. (SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS) City of Corpus Christi Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Page 7 of 8 CONTRACTOR Signature: Printed Name: Title: Owt_ef Date: 1/1,27/114) CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Signature: Printed Name: Title: Date: Attached and Incorporated by Reference: Attachment A: Scope of Work Attachment B: Bid/Pricing Schedule Attachment C: Insurance/Bond Requirements Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Incorporated by Reference Only: Exh'bit 1: RFB/RFP No. 165 Exhibit 2: Contractor's Bid/Proposal Response City of Corpus Christi Seivice Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Page 8 of 8 ATTACHMENT A - SCOPE OF WORK 4.1 General Requirements The Contractor shall mow storm water and street right-of-ways in accordance with the Storm Water Department's maintenance operations of the Storm Water Drainage Collection System. All areas are located within the City limits of the City of Corpus Christi. 4.2 Scope of work A. Prior to each operation, the Contractor shall remove all litter and debris, including paper, cans, bottles, bags, grass clippings, accumulated leaves, palm fronds, and other tree litter including tree limbs from the identified locations. Including, but not limited to, fence lines, sidewalks, trees, shrubs, groundcover beds, all curbs and gutters, and other hard surfaces within the identified location. Pick-up shall consist of removal of visible litter larger than three inches square. Special attention shall be given to insure the removal of objects, which may cause injury, if thrown from equipment. B. Mowers shall be adjusted for a cutting height of approximately five inches. C. Cycle Description: • Street Right -of -Way -8 Cycles • Storm Water Drainage -4 Cycles Street Right -of -Way cycles will run 45 days and Storm Water Drainage cycles will run 90 days. If a cycle is finished before the days are up, the Contractor will not start another cycle until the day after the completion of the previous cycle. There will be only 8 cycle cuts for street right-of-way and 4 cycle cuts for ditch right-of-way in a contract year. Contractor will notify the Contract Administrator upon completion of mowing for a cycle. D. All mowing equipment shall be equipped with sharp blades so as not to tear, but cleanly cut the blades of grass. E. The Contractor shall mow as close as practicable to all fixed objects exercising extreme care not to damage trees, plants, shrubs, fire hydrants, sign and power poles, guardrails, culvert head walls, delineators or other appurtenances which are part of the right-of-way. F. The Contractor shall hand trim around all fixed objects such as trees, plants, shrubs, fire hydrants, sign and power poles, guardrails and culvert head walls, unless specified otherwise and will be subsidiary to the mowing operation. G. The Contractor shall be responsible for notifying the Contract Administrator of large object(s), including, but not limited to furniture, appliances and massive dump sites etc. Any large object(s) which are too large to set aside, shall be mowed around until removal is coordinated by the City. The Contractor shall coordinate the rescheduling of mowing the uncut area with the Contract Administrator. H. After operations, the Contractor shall remove any visible trash and debris that were cut up during the process. The Contractor shall not dispose of any trash or debris into dumpsters located on City property. The trash and debris must be removed from City property and disposed of in accordance with all City ordinances. All trash and litter shall be disposed of properly at the Contractor's expense and proof of such proper disposal through third party invoices or landfill receipts shall be turned in to the Contract Administrator on a monthly basis. I. Emergency Mobilization: Under extraordinary conditions, the City may be required to pull the Contractor from an area actively being worked in order to address an emergency situation. The City recognizes this may create a hardship for the Contractor in terms of equipment and personnel costs. Under such authorized emergency mobilizations the Contract Administrator will authorize the Contractor to charge no more than $75.00 for fuel for each piece of equipment and $50.00 per person, not to exceed $250.00 for labor and equipment in addition to the standard contracted rate for acreage mowed. An "authorized" emergency mobilization is a mobilization initiated by the Contract Administrator. Any unauthorized emergency mobilizations will not be paid for by the City. In addition, the event of an authorized emergency mobilization does not relieve the Contractor of its obligation to maintain the contracted mowing schedule. J. Drought Stipulation: The City intends on establishing a routine scheduled right-of-way mowing program which will control the growth of grass and weeds to an acceptable level. However, the lack of rainfall throughout the contract period may slow the growth of grass and weeds to a level which does not require mowing of the rights- of-way at the predetermined scheduled dates. In the event a drought situation develops at any time throughout the contract period, the Contract Administrator will consult with the Director of Storm Water Operations or designee and in turn will direct the Contractor to either continue mowing, mowing on a limited basis or suspend mowing altogether. Cycles which are canceled due to drought conditions will not be made up. 4.3 Work Site and Conditions A. The work shall be performed at locations throughout the City as defined by group. See Exhibit 1 for locations. B. Contractor shall supply the City with a work schedule to indicate the normal starting and completion times for its operations. C. Work Hours: The Contractor will confine all operations to daylight hours, sunrise to sunset and the schedule must be approved by the Contract Administrator prior to commencing the mowing program. It is expected that the work will be scheduled effectively throughout the contract period in order to accomplish an overall well managed mowing maintenance program. D. Non -Work Hours: The Contractor may not store any equipment or tools on any site. After completion of work at any site, the Contractor must remove all equipment, supplies, and materials from that site. E. Mowing will not be permitted when, in the opinion of the Contract Administrator, soil and weather conditions are such that the rights-of-way will be damaged. Cycles which are canceled due to rainfall will be made up only if needed, as decided by the Contract Administrator. The Contractor will coordinate rescheduling of make-up cycles with the Contract Administrator. F. For Ozone Warning Days the following restrictions apply: 1. No use of chain saws, pole saws, motor scooters and other small engines will be allowed. 2. Diesel powered trimming equipment will be allowed to operate on the second day of back-to-back Ozone Action Days if equipment is labeled stating the type of fuel used and the Contractor has made contact with the Contract Administrator, or designee, and received permission to proceed with work order. 3. Equipment using reformulated gas will be allowed to operate on the third day of back-to-back Ozone Action Days if equipment is labeled stating the type of fuel used and the Contractor has made contact with the Contract Administrator, or designee and received permission to proceed with work order 4.4 Contractor Quality Control and Superintendence The Contractor shall establish and maintain a complete Quality Control Program that is acceptable to the Contract Administrator to assure that the requirements of the Contract are provided as specified. The Contractor will also provide supervision of the work to insure it complies with the contract requirements. 4.5 Traffic Control The Contractor shall follow all traffic regulations in accordance with the current version of the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Signs, sign stands, safety flags, and all other safety materials, devices and safety vests are required to protect the mowers and the traveling public. 4.6 Equipment A. All mowers must be equipped with safety devices which conform to manufacturer's standards and all applicable OSHA regulations to prevent damage to property by flying debris from under the mower. Maximum cutting widths for rigid frame rotary mowers shall be 108 inches. Hinged or batwing mower cutting widths shall be approved by the Contract Administrator. Slope mowers to have 72 inches cutting width and 28 foot or greater cutting reach. All mowers shall be kept in good operating condition and shall be maintained to provide a clean sharp cut of vegetation at all times. All equipment shall be approved by the Contract Administrator. B. The Contractor shall provide a minimum of 1 slope mower, 2 bat-wing mowers, 2 weed eaters and 1 blower for this Work. C. Contractor shall have sufficient resources and personnel to perform the work as specified. 4.7 Safety Requirements Public Safety and Convenience: The safety of the public and the convenience of traffic shall be regarded as prime importance. All portions of streets shall be kept open to traffic. The Contractor shall coordinate all Work with the Contract Administrator and shall place warning signs in accordance with the current version of the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Signs, sign stands, safety flags, and all other safety materials or devices as well as safety vests will be required to protect the trimmers and the traveling public and will be furnished by the Contractor. The Contractor will be responsible for the maintenance or replacement of these items as necessary. If at any time work is in progress, the traffic control devices do not accomplish the intended purpose due to weather or other conditions affecting the safe handling of traffic, the Contractor shall immediately make necessary changes there to correct the unsatisfactory conditions. These provisions for directing traffic will not be paid for directly, but shall be subsidiary to the various bid items of this contract. 4.8 Security and Protection of Property A. Security Requirements: 1. The Contractor shall maintain and abide by the security measures at all locations including locking gates when leaving the sites. 2. The Contractor shall not enter the buildings at any location for any reason without receiving prior approval from the Contract Administrator. B. Protection of Property: 1 The Contractor shall take proper measures to protect all property which might be damaged by Contractor's Work hereunder, and in case of any damage resulting from any act or omission on the part of or on behalf of the Contractor, and shall restore at its own expense the damaged property to a condition similar or equal to that existing before such damage was done, or shall make good such damage in all acceptable manner. 2. All damages which are not repaired or compensated for by the Contractor will be repaired or compensated for by City forces at the Contractor's expense. All expenses charged by the City for repair work or compensation shall be deducted from any monies owed to the Contractor. 4.9 Notifications and Inspections A. Each Monday morning prior to 8:00 a.m., the Contractor shall call or email the assigned Contract Administrator indicating the locations and work being performed that week. No work shall be done without proper, prior notification. B. When a location is completed, the assigned City Inspector shall inspect the site and either approve the work or advise the Contractor of any discrepancies. The Contractor shall take whatever action necessary to correct any discrepancies within one working day. The Contract Administrator shall then make another inspection and if the discrepancies have not been corrected, the Contractor will be notified and a $25 re -inspection fee will be charged for a third inspection. At that time, the Contractor shall have one working day to complete the work. If the discrepancies still have not been corrected, the Contractor will be notified to correct the discrepancies and a $25 fee will be charged for each additional inspection necessary until discrepancies have been corrected. The City shall deduct the inspection fee from the payment to be made to the Contractor for that cycle of maintenance. C. The City shall have the right at all times to examine the supplies, materials and equipment used by the Contractor, its subcontractors, agents, and employees. D. Work Crew Supervision: The Contractor shall provide qualified supervision of each crew at all times while working under this Contract. Each supervisor shall be authorized by the Contractor to accept and act upon all directives issued by the City and Contract Administrator. Failure of the supervisor to act on said directives shall be sufficient cause to give notice that the Contractor is in default of the contract, unless such directives would create potential personal injury or safety hazards. Exhibit 1 STREET RIGHT OF WAY Zone 7 Section 1 ID Street Name Location Acres 1 Bates Street Flato to S.P.I.D. 1.223 3 Bear Lane S.P.I.D. to Joe Mireuir Road 8.45 4 Bush S.P.I.D. to Los Robles 2.995 6 Flato Road Agnes (S.H. 44) to Bear Lane 5.061 7 Forrest Lane NPID to Gibson 0.246 8 Greenwood Saratoga to Dead End 2.76 9 Hereford Agnes (S.H. 44) to Leopard 2.69 10 Heinsohn Road Agnes to Bear Lane 3.328 11 Holly Road Greenwood to Los Robles 0.593 12 Leopard Navigation to N.P.I.D 6.1 13 McBride Leopard to Up River 3.636 14 Molina/Rockford Alley West Point Rd. to Dead End 2.667 15 McCampbell Agnes (S.H. 44) to Leopard 3.326 16 Navigation Old Brownsville Road to Up River 15.481 17 N.P.I.D. North Bound - Bear Lane to Agnes 3.636 18 N.P.I.D. South Bound - Gibson to Bear Lane 1.455 19 N.P.I.D. South Bound - Leopard to Lexington 0.85 20 Old Brownsville Road Post to Morgan 1.082 21 Old Brownsville Road S.P.I.D. to Saratoga 25.207 22 S.P.I.D. N. & S. - Greenwood to Bear Lane 3.393 23 Talbert Road Agnes (S. H. 440 to Pavement Ends) 2.085 24 Villa Agnes (S.H. 44) to Baldwin 1.405 25 West Point Road S.P.I.D. to Old Brownsville Road 4.008 Total 101.677 STREET RIGHT OF WAY Zone 7 Section 2 ID Street Name Location Acres 26 Agnes (S.H. 44) Gilliam to Rand Morgan 2.729 27 Alpine Manning to N. Clarkwood Road 4.875 28 Bearden Suntide to Hunter Road 1.059 29 Benys Road Leopard to Hampshire 0.624 30 Bockholt Road Agnes (S.H. 44) to McGloin Road 7.677 31 Bronco Road Agnes (S.H. 44) to Sedwick 5.554 32 Chickery Alpine to Dead -End 0.832 33 N. Clarkwood Road Agnes (S.H. 44) to Up River Road 14.596 34 S. Clarkwood Road Agnes (S.H. 44) to City Limits Line 13.45 35 Commerce Agnes (S.H. 44) to Eklund 1.375 36 Corn Products Road I.H. 37 to Hopkins Road 10.411 37 Eklund So. Clarkwood Road to Commerce 0.687 38 Gilliam Root to Alpine 0.34 39 Hopkins Road Lexington Blvd. To Agnes (S.H. 44) 4.969 40 Hunter Road Leopard to Up River Road 2.936 41 Iris S. Clarkwood to Commerce 0.904 42 Lantana Lexington Blvd. To Up River Road 8.489 43 Leopard N.P.I.D. to Corn Products Road 7.75 44 Leopard Corn Products Road to Rand Morgan Road 42.335 45 Lexington Blvd. Leopard to N.I.P.D. 4.157 46 Manning Agnes (S.H. 44) to Sedwick Road 5.363 47 McGloin Road S. Clarkwood to City Limits (F.M. 763) 9.995 48 Rhew Street Sedwick to Bearden 3.022 49 Root N. Clarkwood to Gilliam N. Side 0.13 50 Rusk Street Agnes (S.H. 44) to Dead -End 0.414 51 Sedwick Road South Minerals Road to North Clarkwood 9.313 52 South Minerals Road Up River Road to Sedwick 6.286 53 Stillwell Lane Leopard to End of Pavement 1.1 1 1 54 Suntide Road Leopard to Lakeview Circle 3.715 55 Tuloso Road Stillwell to Up River Road 0.815 Total 175.913 Street Right of Way Zone 8 Section 1 ID Street Name Location Acres 56 Baskett Countiss to Robby 0.358 57 Butler Violet Road to Cliff Cranshaw 0.742 58 Callicoatte Road Up River to City Limits 10.774 59 Carbon Plant Road Up River Road to City Limits Line 0.704 60 Church Street Leopard to Dead -End 0.419 61 Cliff Crenshaw Willowood to Blades 0.88 62 County Rd. 69 F. M. 624 to Co. Rd. 52 1.73 63 County Rd. 52 (North Side) Hwy 77 to County Rd. 69 0.68 64 E. Harrington Leopard to Dead -End 0.999 65 Emory Rushing to Dead -End 2.124 66 F. M. 624 Wildcat Drive to City Limits 34.13 67 N. Harrington McKinzie Road to Irma 1.454 68 Harney Dead -End South to Dead -End North 0.314 69 Haven Road Violet to Pavement Ends 2.238 70 Hart Road Leopard to Up River Road 1.651 71 Hearn Road Callicoatte Road to Brooklane 6.456 72 Kingsbury McKinzie to McCain 1.059 73 Leonard Starlite to Leopard 3.564 74 Leopard Street Rand Morgan Road to Violet Road 17.92 75 Leopard Violet Road to Railroad Tracks 14.462 76 Lois Leopard to N. Harrington 0.356 77 Mallard Violet Road to Widgeon 1.431 78 Mobile Robby to Rhodes 0.47 79 McCain Leopard to Dead-End 1.635 80 McKinzie Lane McKinzie Road to Carbon Plant Road 3.367 81 McKinzie Road Kingsbury to City Limits 8.587 82 Nelon Violet Road to Dead-End 0.505 83 Rand Morgan Agnes (S.H. 44) to I.H. 37 22.995 84 Rehfield Up River Road to I. H. 37 0.766 85 Rhodes Ct. Leopard to Mobile 0.303 86 Robby Leopard to Kingsbury 2.188 87 Sessions Road I.H. 37 to End of Pavement 1.49 88 Shady Lane Starlite to Leonard 0.719 89 Shane McCain to Dwyer 0.35 90 Starlite Violet Road to Sunny 2.37 91 Up River Road I. H. 37 (Violet) to McKenzie 6.1 92 Up River Road Rand Morgan to Clarkwood 1.6 93 Up River Road I. H. 37 to Sharpsburg Road 10.299 94 Violet Starlite to City Limits 5.759 95 Widgeon Dead Ends to Haven 0.954 96 Warrior Haven to Horseshoe 0.44 Total 175.342 Street Right of Way Zone 8 Section 2 ID Street Name Location Acres 97 Buckhorn Leopard to Railroad Avenue 0.215 98 Cynthia River Lane to Sharpsburg 1.906 99 Elliff Leopard to Railroad Avenue 0.422 100 Figueroa Sharpsburg to Nueces River 2.882 101 IH 37 E. side Sharpsburg to Sharpsburg 2.33 102 Railroad Avenue Redbird East to I.H. 37 0.495 103 Ripple St. Highway 77 to Northwest Trail 0.37 104 River Lane Zamora to Dead End 5.313 105 Sharpsburg Road Up River Road to Leopard (I.H. 37) 3.978 106 Zamora Sharpsburg to River Lane 0.684 107 Leopard 2nd Cut Lexington to Rand Morgan, medians and shoulders 15' width. Rand Morgan to RR tracks, shoulders only 15' width 52.35 108 Saratoga Blvd. Greenwood to Old Brownsville 26.902 109 CR73 FM 624 to 5155 CR 73 0.98 110 FM 1889 FM 624 to City Limits at 1400' both sides 1 Total 98.827 Street Right -of -Way Total Acres 551.759 STORM WATER DRAINAGE DITCH RIGHT OF WAY ID ZONE 7 AREA 1 5 C. C. Industrial Ditch Agnes (S. H. 44) to Airport Ditch #2 2.11 6 Dona Ditch Up River to dead-end 0.69 7 Donigan Ditch Agnes (S.H. 44) to Kosar Ditch 9.09 8 Enterprise Ditch #1 Agnes (S.H. 44) to S.P.I.D. 27.46 9 Enterprise Ditch #2 S.P.I.D. to Kelly Ditch 18.54 10 Flato Road (Collector) Agnes (S. H. 44) to Bear Lane 3.18 11 Heinsohn Ditch N.P.I.D. to Kosar Ditch 10.34 12 Hopkins Ditch (Roadside) Lexington to Acme Ditch 3.68 13 Hopkins Road Ditch (Collector) Hopkins Ditch to Acme Ditch 1.81 14 Kosar Ditch N.P.I.D. to Joe Mieur 11.63 15 Navigation Ditch #1 Navigation to Airport #2 0.76 16 Navigation Ditch #2 Navigation to Airport #2 0.76 17 Weil Ditch Leopard to City Limits 1.77 18 L -Rod Ditch Charles - Upriver - 1st Telephone pole 1.17 19 Carbon Plant Drainage Ditch UpRiver Road to IH 37 2.76 20 Till Creek Drainage Ditch Bearden to IH 37 to UpRiver Road 3.61 ID ZONE 7 AREA 2 & ZONE 8 AREAS 1&2 21 Church Violet Road to dead-end 0.43 22 Clarkwood Ditch Bark St. Channel to Clarkwood East #1 5.43 23 Clarkwood Road Ditch (Collector) Leopard to Bark Street Channel 8.20 24 Cl rkwood East Ditch So. Clarkwood Road to Clarkwood Ditch 0.31 25 Clarkwood E. Ditch Agnes (S.H. 44) to So. Clarkwood 2.29 26 Five Point Outfall U. S. 77 to Emory Street 8.91 27 Gilliam Ditch Gilliam St. to the Bark St. Channel 0.35 28 Kingswood Ditch (Collector) Turkey Ditch to Starlite Lane 1.35 29 Magee Ditch I. H. 37 to 500' N. of Up River Road 2.11 30 McNorton Ditch Blanco Rd. to Clarkwood 25.67 31 Railroad Ditch Railroad Tracks to N. of Up River Rd. 2.72 32 Ravine Ditch Leopard to Dead-end 0.64 33 River Ridge/Wal-Mart Riverside to dead-end 4.50 34 Turkey Creek Ditch Frontier to Up River Rd. 21.59 35 Violet Ditch Turkey Ditch to dead-end 14.42 37 Woodriver Ditch #1 Dead End to 620 ft. N. of Beal 3.86 38 Woodriver Ditch #2 Woodriver Street to City Limits 3.77 39 Turkey Creek Ditch Leopard to West Guth Park 1.60 40 Emory Ditch East Side East side of Emory Road 2.71 41 Kelly Ditch Kosar Ditch to Hwy 44 16.16 42 Julianna Ditch Sessions to Juliana 0.52 STORM WATER DRAINAGE DITCH RIGHT OF WAY TOTAL ACRES 226.90 2/27/2013 LEGEND — Ditch ROW Contract — Street ROW Contract — Moored by State Ditch ■Duch WRoadsde :Cry Limits 3r. ,SIORh1 WNFR MOWING ZONE Section Map: 6410 -14.-10 -10 79-01.-02-00-0000-09 09 2/27/2013 LEGEND — Ditch ROW Contract — Street ROW Contract — Moored by State Ditch ■00th Roadside :CW Limits statmlVNFR MOWING ZONE j" M. o 2/21/2013 Io LEGEND h hac Street ROW GoROW Gonnhact I —Ouc—Moored by State Ditch Wm. ®Roadside —::Gm' L mets Q lk, .. 11110 O fr � \ ae o� A d 0. w.w. eeenww k m xwEr rn 46...„srortmiwviu MOWING ZO N E R .g 1 ‘lit‘ M.re. �oa la v myL �., .... ill mss. 79-07.79-0a. 79-10.74, J9-1z7¢,57¢,s 2/27/2013 LEGEND — Ouch ROW Contract — Street ROW Contract — Moored by State Ditch ■Orth WRoadsde :Cry Limits MOWING ZONE 2/27/2013 LEGEND — Ditch ROW Contract — Street ROW Contract — Moored by State Ditch ■00th WRoadsde :CW Limits statmlVNFR MOWING ZONE 07 2/27/2013 LEGEND — Ditch ROW Contract Street ROW Contract — Moored by State Ditch ■00th 1NRoadsde COY Limits statmlVNFR MOWING ZONE NAND MORON S t 15.56-03 -04,-07, .-11.-12.-15.-16.57-(G,13.67-01-0506 2/27/2013 LEGEND — Ditch ROW Contract — Street ROW Contract — Moored by State Ditch ■00th WRoadsde :CW Limits STORM WATT MOWING ZONE Section Map: 5&1367-0267-0367-04680167-0667-0767-08680567-1067-1167-12 2/27/2013 LEGEND — Ditch ROW Contract — Street ROW Contract — Moored by State Ditch ■00th Roadside :CW Limits ST0R/C' MOWING ZONE Section Map: 68-0368-0368066807680E 68(196&,06&„6&,269036&,66&,56&,6 2/27/2013 LEGEND — Ditch ROW Contract — Street ROW Contract — Moored by State Ditch ■00th Roadside :C rty Limits 3r. ,SIORh1 WNFR MOWING ZONE 2/27/2013 LEGEND — Ditch ROW Contract — Street ROW Contract — Moored by State Ditch ■0126 Roadside :C1y Limits �,SIORM WNFR MOWING ZONE 1 OLE J HOLLY HATOOE son Mav: Tats 2/27/2013 • LEGEND — Ditch ROW Contract — Street ROW Contract — Moored by State Ditch ■00th Roadside :CW Limits STORM WIITFR MOWING ZONE Date: ATTACHMENT B - BID/PRICING SCHEDULE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI BID FORM PURCHASING DIVISION RFB No. 165 Mowing of Storm Water and Street Right -of -Ways /0/30/Re 240.-inzb -eGrj . uthori eBidder: rush rK Signature: 1. Refer to "Instructions to Bidders" and Contract Terms and Conditions before completing bid. 2. Quote your best price for each item. 3. In submitting this bid, Bidder certifies that: a. the prices in this bid have been arrived at independently, without consultation, communication, or agreement with any other Bidder or competitor, for the purpose of restricting competition with regard to prices; b. Bidder is an Equal Opportunity Employer; and the Disclosure of Interest information on file with City's purchasing office, pursuant to the Code of Ordinances, is current and true. c. Bidder is current with all taxes due and company is in good standing with all required governmental agencies. d. Bidder acknowledges receipt and review of all addenda for this RFB. Group Acres Cycles Unit Price per Cycle Total Price Street Right -of -Way 551.759 8 $ 19 /511 $ 161-1 1$� Storm Water Drainage 226.90 4 $ 1Y62 $ 2(3‘211 TOTAL $ 3 (0,772, ATTACHMENT C - INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS I. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY INSURANCE A. Contractor must not commence work under this contract until all insurance required has been obtained_and such insurance has been approved by the City. Contractor must not allow any subcontractor, to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. B. Contractor must furnish to the City's Risk Manager and Contract Administrator one (1) copy of Certificates of Insurance with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies by endorsement, and a waiver of subrogation endorsement is required on GL, AL and WC if applicable. Endorsements must be provided with Certificate of Insurance. Project name and/or number must be listed in Description Box of Certificate of Insurance. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -day advance written notice of cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination required on all certificates and policies. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises - Operations 3. Products/Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non -Owned 3. Rented/Leased $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit WORKERS'S COMPENSATION (All States Endorsement if Company is not domiciled in Texas) Employers Liability *Workers' Compensation requirement can be waived if contractor submits a notarized Affidavit stating they are the sole owner/employee of their company.* Statutory and complies with Part II of this Exhibit. $500,000/$500,000/$500,000 C. In the event of accidents of any kind related to this contract, Contractor must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. II. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Applicable for paid employees, Contractor must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers' compensation coverage provided must be in statutory amounts according to the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation. An All States Endorsement shall be required if Contractor is not domiciled in the State of Texas. B. Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Contractor's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. C. Contractor shall be required to submit renewal certificates of insurance throughout the term of this contract and any extensions within 10 days of the policy expiration dates. All notices under this Exhibit shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 D. Contractor agrees that, with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • List the City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, as additional insureds by endorsement with regard to operations, completed operations, and activities of or on behalf of the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; • Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and • Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any, cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination in coverage and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. E. Within five (5) calendar days of a cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination of coverage, Contractor shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Contractor's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. F. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Contractor's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Contractor to stop work hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. G. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contractor's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this contract. H. It is agreed that Contractor's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this contract. I. It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this contract. 2016 Insurance Requirements Purchasing General Mowing Contractors 08/08/2016 my Risk Management ATTACHMENT C- BOND REQUIREMENTS No Bond Requirement is necessary for this Service Agreement. ATTACHMENT D- WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS No warranty is required for the Service Agreement. p Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.277 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-149461 Date Filed: 12/3012016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. 2Chainz brush clearing LLC Lolita, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. 799 Mowing of storm water and street right of ways 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. X I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. , y t 1C 4 r t r �tgY u$c� AMANDA SANCHEZ y NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF TEXAS MY COMM. EXP. 12/14/2019 �rq o\,44y NOTARY ID 13046708-3 Sign ure of authorized agent of ccrtracting business entity �y i� Aj� I( tl �1 rl r , this the ! t) day of')Q`"�"' ,. AFFIX NOTARY STAMP t SEAL ABOVE Sworn t and subscribed before me, by the said 20_ 1, to certify which, witness my hand and PUN* seal of office. mtkak, Sam e)- 'Wm*. Printed Si nature of offic r�sterin 9 oath name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering 9 oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.277 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of January 31, 2017 DATE: January 24, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Lawrence Mikolajczyk, Director of Solid Waste Operations LawM(c�cctexas.com (361)826-1972 Maria Pedraza, Procurement Manager MariaPe(c�cctexas.co (361)826-3176 Landfill Gas/Blower Flare for Cefe Valenzuela Landfill CAPTION: Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a service agreement with Parnel Biogas. Inc., of Tulsa, Oklahoma, for the purchase of a gas/blower flare in accordance with Request for Bids No.184, based on lowest, responsive and responsible bid for a total amount not to exceed $271,475.64, to be funded by Solid Waste 2017 Certificates of Obligation. The term of the agreement is for 12 months. PURPOSE: The purpose of this agreement to fabricate a gas/blower flare for the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Cefe Valenzuela Landfill, is the City's newest and only active landfill and is considered a Regional Landfill with the capacity to serve the Costal Bend and other adjacent areas. The Cefe Valenzuela Landfill has been in operation for nine years, since the official closure of J. C. Elliott Landfill. As the incoming waste is managed and properly landfilled, it naturally decomposes and produces landfill gases, primarily methane. Methane gas is a greenhouse gas that contains hazardous air pollutants and is regulated by EPA. Federal and State regulations regarding landfills, that have the potential to emit air pollutants, require that once a new landfill produces a specific threshold reading of landfill gas, the landfill must install Gas Collection and Control System within a specified time period or face daily fines for non- compliance. In July 2015 during the annual landfill gas testing, results were obtained showing that the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill gas emissions trigged the requirement for a Gas Collection and Control System, which must be installed and operational by November 11, 2017. A Gas Collection and Control System consists of a series of vertical wells sunk into the waste pile, along with header pipes to collect the landfill gases to a single point for either sale to the market or disposal by flaring. It is important to mention that in the case of sale to market, a flare is required as the backup option to assist in a maintenance shutdown or to handle process upsets. In order to expedite the procurement of the flare, which is a critical path item for Gas Collection and Control System completion, and to save overhead and markup expenses, Solid Waste Operations enlisted the help of the City's Purchasing Division to directly procure the landfill gas flare from qualified manufacturers. Parallel to this effort, Solid Waste Operations utilized Engineering Services to design and bid a construction project for the Gas Collection and Control System. To assure compliance with the regulatory deadline, the Gas Collection and Control System contractor will be installing wells, headers, and appurtenances while the flare is being manufactured. The project will conclude with the erection of the flare and demonstration of system operation prior to the regulatory deadline. A total five bids were received, of which Parnel Biogas, Inc. provided the lowest, responsive and responsible bid. ALTERNATIVES: N/A OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: The City currently flares the landfill gas at the closed J.C. Elliot Landfill. Past efforts, since 2005, to develop a commercial gas to energy project at J.C. Elliot Landfill have been unsuccessful due to the low market prices of natural gas, which is primarily due to activity of the Eagle Ford Shale bringing gas prices down. The flare assembly in this item is designed to allow for the development of a gas -to -energy project in the future, should the market price of natural gas become viable for market development of the gas produced at Cefe Valenzuela Landfill. Staff has worked diligently with consultants and regulators to ensure these systems are in place prior to the regulatory deadline. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This purchase conforms to the City's purchasing policies and procedures and State Statues regulating procurements. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Solid Waste Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue x Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $2,500,000.00 $0.00 $2,500,000.00 Encumbered / Expended Amount $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 This item $ 271,475.64 $0.00 $271,475.64 BALANCE $2,228,524.36 $0.00 $2,228,524.36 Fund(s): Solid Waste 2017 Certificates of Obligation Comments: Funds for the Solid Waste Department in the amount of $274,250 have been budgeted in FY 2017 in the Solid Waste Certificates of Obligation Fund. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Bid Tab Service Agreement Presentation CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION BUYER: Fidel Rodriguez BID TABULATION EVENT - 184 LFG Flare for Cefe Valenzuela Landfill 1/5/2017 Recorded by: Fidel Rodriguez Supplier Parnel Biogas Inc. John Zink Company, LLC LFG Specialties, L.L.0 Perennial Energy, LLC JM Davidson Inc Complete Flare Package $271,475.64 $274,250.00 $277,482.00 $297,952.00 $460,000 SERVICE AGREEMENT NO. 951 Landfill Gas/Blower Flare Project THIS Landfill Gas/Blower Flare Project Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation ("City") and Parnel Biogas, Inc. ("Contractor'), effective upon execution by the City Manager or the City Manager's designee ("City Manager"). WHEREAS, Contractor has bid to provide Landfill Gas/Blower Flare Project in response to Request for Bid/Proposal No. 184 ("RFB/RFP"), which RFB/RFP includes the required scope of work and all specifications and which RFB/RFP and the Contractor's bid or proposal response, as applicable, are incorporated by reference in this Agreement as Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively, as if each were fully set out here in its entirety. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Contractor agree as follows: 1. Scope. Contractor will provide Landfill Gas/Flare for the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill ("Services") in accordance with the attached Scope of Work, as shown in Attachment A, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety, and in accordance with Exhibit 2. 2. Term. This Agreement is for 12 months, with performance commencing upon the date of issuance of a notice to proceed from the Contract Administrator or Purchasing Division. This Agreement includes an option to extend the term for up to zero additional zero -month periods ("Option Period"), provided, the parties do so prior to expiration of the original term or the then -current Option Period. The decision to exercise the option to extend the term of this Agreement is, at all times, within the sole discretion of the City and is conditioned upon the prior written agreement of the Contractor and the City Manager. 3. Compensation and Payment. The total value of this Agreement is not to exceed $271,475.64 subject to approved extensions and changes. Payments will be made for Services as follows: 25% upon approval of shop drawings; 25% six weeks after drawings are approved; 25% when flare is ready to ship; and 25% upon system start up, each subject to receipt of an acceptable invoice. All pricing must be in accordance with the attached Bid/Pricing Schedule, as shown in Attachment B, the content of which is Page 1 of 9 incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 4. Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this Agreement, including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for payment. The City's Contract Administrator for this Agreement is as follows: Tony Benavides Solid Waste Department (361) 826-1633 tonyb@cctexas.com 5. Insurance; Bonds. (A) Before performance can begin under this Agreement, the Contractor must deliver a certificate of insurance ("COI"), as proof of the required insurance coverages, to the City's Risk Manager and the Contract Administrator. Additionally, the COI must state that the City will be given at least 30 days' advance written notice of cancellation, material change in coverage, or intent not to renew any of the policies. The City must be named as an additional insured. The City Attorney must be given copies of all insurance policies within 10 days of the City Manager's written request. Insurance requirements are as stated in Attachment C, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. (B) In the event a payment bond, a performance bond, or both, are required of the Contractor to be provided to the City under this Agreement before performance can commence, the terms, conditions, and amounts required in the bonds and appropriate surety information are as included in the RFB/RFP or as may be added to Attachment C, and such content is incorporated here in this Agreement by reference as if each bond's terms, conditions, and amounts were fully set out here in its entirety. 6. Purchase Release Order. For multiple -release purchases of Services to be provided by the Contractor over a period of time, the City will exercise its right to specify time, place and quantity of Services to be delivered in the following manner: any City department or division may send to Contractor a purchase release order signed by an authorized agent of the department or division. The purchase release order must refer to this Agreement, and Services will not be rendered until the Contractor receives the signed purchase release order. Page 2 of 9 7. Inspection and Acceptance. Any Services that are provided but not accepted by the City must be corrected or re -worked immediately at no charge to the City. If immediate correction or re -working at no charge cannot be made by the Contractor, a replacement service may be procured by the City on the open market and any costs incurred, including additional costs over the item's bid/proposal price, must be paid by the Contractor within 30 days of receipt of City's invoice. 8. Warranty. The Contractor warrants that all products supplied under this Agreement are new, quality items that are free from defects, fit for their intended purpose, and of good material and workmanship. The Contractor warrants that it has clear title to the products and that the products are free of liens or encumbrances. In addition, the products purchased under this Agreement shall be warranted by the Contractor or, if indicated in Attachment D by the manufacturer, for the period stated in Attachment D. Attachment D is attached to this Agreement and is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 8.1 Liquidated Damages (A) Liquidated damages are the specified dollar amount the Contractor shall pay to the City due to the Contractor's failure to complete the Scope of Work within the Completion Time detailed in RFB No. 184 and this Agreement. (B) The parties recognize and agree that time is of the essence for this Agreement. The parties recognize that the City will suffer financial loss if the Scope of Work is not completed within the times specified. The parties also recognize the delays, expense, and difficulties involved in proving in a legal or arbitration proceeding the actual loss suffered by the City if the Scope of Work is not completed on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof, the parties agree that the Contractor will pay liquidated damages for delay if acceptance of the work has not occurred on or before any of the milestone due dates shown in the table below. Liquidated damages will be assessed for each missed milestone listed below and thus may be cumulative. These liquidated damages shall not be construed as a penalty. (C) Execution of the Agreement shall constitute agreement by the City and Contractor that the amount specified is the minimum value of the costs and actual damage caused by the failure of the Contractor to complete the Scope of Work within the allotted time. Such sum is liquidated damages and may be deducted from payments due the Contractor if such delay occurs. Page 3 of 9 (D) The City shall have the right to deduct said liquidated damages from any amount due or that may become due to the Contractor, or to collect such liquidated damages from the Contractor or its surety. (E) The City shall determine whether the Scope of Work has been completed within the time allowed under the Agreement. (F) Progress payments made by the City are not to be considered a waiver of liquidated damages. (G) The City expressly denies that any progress payments made after the scheduled completion date constitute a waiver of liquidated damages. (H) Failure of the Contractor to complete the Scope of Work within the time allowed will result in damages being sustained by the City. For each consecutive day in excess of the time specified for the completion of work, as adjusted in accordance with the Agreement, the Contractor shall pay to the City, or have withheld from monies due it, the amount of liquidated damages shown in the table of liquidated damages below: LIQUIDATED DAMAGES Milestone Due Date Liquidated Damage Delivery of Flare 182 days from NTP $2000 / day Testing and Training Complete 243 days from NTP $2000 / day (I) All liquidated damages shall be charged at the value indicated for amount of time or any part thereof that the Contractor is late. (J) These provisions shall not prevent the City, in the case of the Contractor's default under this Agreement, from terminating the right of the Contractor to proceed as provided in the Agreement and seeking all damages and other remedies available to the City under this Agreement or by law. 9. Quality/Quantity Adjustments. Any Service quantities indicated on the Bid/Pricing Schedule are estimates only and do not obligate the City to order or accept more than the City's actual requirements nor do the estimates restrict the City from ordering less than its actual needs during the term of the Agreement and including any Option Period. Substitutions and deviations from the City's product requirements or specifications are prohibited without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator. Page 4 of 9 10. Non -Appropriation. The continuation of this Agreement after the close of any fiscal year of the City, which fiscal year ends on September 30th annually, is subject to appropriations and budget approval specifically covering this Agreement as an expenditure in said budget, and it is within the sole discretion of the City's City Council to determine whether or not to fund this Agreement. The City does not represent that this budget item will be adopted, as said determination is within the City Council's sole discretion when adopting each budget. 11. Independent Contractor. Contractor will perform the work required by this Agreement as an independent contractor and will furnish such Services in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances or conditions will any agent, servant or employee of the Contractor be considered an employee of the City. 12. Subcontractors. Contractor may use subcontractors in connection with the work performed under this Agreement. When using subcontractors, however, the Contractor must obtain prior written approval from the Contract Administrator if the subcontractors were not named at the time of bid or proposal, as applicable. In using subcontractors, the Contractor is responsible for all their acts and omissions to the same extent as if the subcontractor and its employees were employees of the Contractor. All requirements set forth as part of this Agreement, including the necessity of providing a COI in advance to the City, are applicable to all subcontractors and their employees to the same extent as if the Contractor and its employees had performed the work. 13. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by written change order signed by both parties. Change orders may be used to modify quantities as deemed necessary by the City. 14. Waiver. No waiver by either party of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement waives any subsequent breach of the same. 15. Taxes. The Contractor covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment taxes and all other related taxes. Upon request, the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of these taxes within 15 days of such request. 16. Notice. Any notice required under this Agreement must be given by fax, hand delivery, or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is deemed received on the day faxed or hand -delivered or on the third day after postmark if sent by certified mail. Notice must be sent as follows: Page 5 of 9 IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Tony Benavides Contract Administrator 2397 County Road 20, Robstown, Texas 78380 Fax: (361) 826-1970 IF TO CONTRACTOR: Parnel Biogas, Inc. Attn: Jeff Parker Title: President 5868 S. 129th E. Ave., Tulsa, Oklahoma 74134 Fax: (918) 234-1968 17. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS ("INDEMNITEES') FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER ON ACCOUNT OF PERSONAL INJURIES (INCLUDING DEATH AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS), PROPERTY LOSS OR DAMAGE, OR ANY OTHER KIND OF INJURY, LOSS, OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES WHICH ARISE OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEEMENT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE INJURIES, DEATH OR DAMAGES ARE CAUSED OR ARE CLAIMED TO BE CAUSED BY THE CONCURRENT OR CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES, BUT NOT IF BY THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES UNMIXED WITH THE FAULT OF ANY OTHER PERSON. CONTRACTOR MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, INVESTIGATE ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ANY KIND ARISING FROM ANY SAID LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. Page 6 of 9 18. Termination. (A) The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Contractor's failure to perform the work specified in this Agreement or to keep any required insurance policies in force during the entire term of this Agreement. The Contract Administrator must give the Contractor written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Contractor has not cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. (B) Alternatively, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 30 days advance written notice to the Contractor. The City Manager may also terminate this Agreement upon 24 hours written notice to the Contractor for failure to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes as set out in this Agreement. 19. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement by the Contractor, or of any right or interest contained herein, is effective unless the City Manager first gives written consent to such assignment. The performance of this Agreement by the Contractor is of the essence of this Agreement, and the City Manager's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City Manager on any ground whatsoever. 20. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is considered to be severable and, if, for any reason, any provision or part of this Agreement is determined to be invalid and contrary to applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of nor affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, but this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part had been omitted. 21. Order of Precedence. In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement, its attachments, and exhibits, such conflicts and inconsistencies will be resolved by reference to the documents in the following order of priority: A. this Agreement and its attachments B. the bid solicitation document, including addenda (Exhibit 1) C. the Contractor's bid response (Exhibit 2) 22. Certificate of Interested Parties. Contractor agrees to comply with Texas Government Code Section 2252.908, as it may be amended, and to complete Form 1295 "Certificate of Interested Parties" as part of this Agreement. Page 7 of 9 23. Governing Law. This Agreement is subject to all federal, State, and local laws, rules, and regulations. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of the State of Texas, and such form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district, county, or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas. 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, either oral or written, between the parties. (SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS) Page 8 of 9 CONTRACTOR Signature: Printed Name: —Se Title: �.QESi occiT Date: // 9/_/ 7 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Signature: Printed Name: Title: Date: Attached and Incorporated by Reference: Attachment A: Scope of Work Attachment B: Bid/Pricing Schedule Attachment C: Insurance/Bond Requirements Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Incorporated by Reference Only: Exhibit 1: RFB/RFP No. 184 Exhibit 2: Contractor's Bid/Proposal Response Page 9 of 9 Attachment A: Scope of Work 1.1 General Requirements/Background Information The Contractor shall provide delivery of a Landfill Gas Blower/Flare for the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill, as outlined in this Scope of Work. For clarification purposes in the Scope of Work Section (1.2), the Gas Blower/Flare Supplier will be referred to as Contractor and the third party Gas Collection and Control System (GCCS) Contractor will be referred to as Installer. 1.2 Scope of Work A. The Contractor shall provide (including freight), related to the landfill gas (LFG) flare and separate equipment skid: 1. LFG Flare System (14 -inch candlestick) 2. Gas Handling System 3. Control Panel, Instrumentation, and Operational Logic B. In the interest of total system compatibility, reliability, quality, cost, and single source responsibility; the systems and assemblies furnished under this section shall be designed, manufactured, and/or supplied by a single vendor (referred herein as the Contractor. C. Equipment, specified herein, will be installed by a qualified Installer, including flare and blower/equipment skid. D. Contractor shall provide the modular, blower/equipment skid and flare including all components necessary for a complete and operational system. The 14 -inch candlestick flare will be on a separate foundation from the blower/equipment skid. The blower/equipment skid and flare shall be sized as follows: 1. To initially extract, demist and knockout condensate, and compress and combust a maximum of 121.4 MMBtu/hr. (4,000 SCFM @ 50% CH4) of LFG. 2. Piping, demister and controls on the blower/equipment skid shall be designed and sized to accommodate the following: a. Two (2), 2,000 SCFM blowers with variable frequency drive (VFD) shall be installed initially for operation in parallel (capability to operate simultaneously): b. Space for a third 2,000 SCFM blower and VFD shall be provided, including flange connections and PLC program for installation and operation in the future. Space for third blower shall also accommodate operation in parallel with either of initial blowers; and c. Total maximum combined flow rate of the initial two blowers shall be 4,000 SCFM. E. The total system shall include three principal sub -systems; 1) LFG Flare System; 2) Gas Handling System (blowers/equipment skid); and 3) Control Panel, Instrumentation, and Operational Logic (Note, the Gas Handling System and Control Panel, Instrumentation, and Operational Logic shall be included on one skid). The subsystems shall include but not be limited to, the following components: 1. LFG Flare System a. Flame Arrester b. Pneumatic shutdown valve c. Flare stack assembly d. Stainless steel burner assembly e. Stainless steel burner shroud f. Isolation valves (interconnecting HDPE piping between flare and blower/equipment skid to be supplied and installed by Installer) g. Internal electrical wiring h. Propane pilot and ignition system 2. Gas Handling System a. Two LFG blowers, with space and flanged process piping to accommodate the addition of a third blower (same size and model) in the future. b. Demister/Filter System c. Process Valves d. Process Piping e. Flow Meter Assembly 3. Control Panel, Instrumentation, and Operational Logic a. Enclosure/cabinets/junction boxes b. Control and annunciation devices c. Interconnecting conduit and wiring d. PLC supervisory control system e. Ethernet switch for remote connection capabilities including cabling to all control devices (Yokogawa Chart recorder, CMore OIP, PLC, etc.) All devices will be factory configured to a common network mask prior to delivery to the project site. f. All required electrical controls, motor controls, annunciation systems, alarm systems and logic systems F. Contractor shall perform all equipment and system testing, and demonstrate compliance with performance requirements specified herein. G. Following installation of the system by Installer. Contractor shall also perform the initial system start-up demonstration and testing in the presence of the City and training for City designated personnel. Contractor shall provide a minimum of three days for start-up demonstration and testing. Personnel training shall be performed on the 3rd day of the start-up demonstration and testing. 1.3 Performance A. Operating Conditions: The LFG flare and equipment skid components (System) shall be capable of operating under the following performance requirements and operating ranges: 1. Gas flow rates: The System shall be capable of operating at a LFG flow rate and a heat flow content of 10% maximum load rating of the flare (i.e., 400 SCFM) through 100% maximum load rating described in Part 1.2.D. 2. The LFG flare shall be designed in accordance with 40 CFR, Part 60.18 and shall meet the requirements of those criteria throughout the full operation range of the System. B. LFG composition: In the absence of actual qualitative gas data, the composition of the LFG for this project shall assumed to be as follows: 1. Composition: 25% to 60% CH4 25% to 60% CO2 Remainder air, inert gases, and trace components 2. Temperature: 100°F 3. LFG Moisture Content: Saturated C. Mechanical: 1. Design Wind Speed (IBC):130mph (Inland I, Corpus Christi, TX 2. Seismic Zone: 4 3. Site Elevation: 0 ft. above sea level 4. Electrical Area: Non -hazardous (unclassified) 1.4 Submittals A. Shag Drawings: Before any of the materials are delivered to the Site, the Contractor shall submit complete shop drawings to the City for review and approval. Shop drawings shall show all details of: 1. Equipment dimensions, layout plan and profile drawings showing equipment orientation on skid, and component parts and list of materials. 2. Electrical wiring diagram and details, including a complete Process and instrumentation drawing (P&ID). 3. Installation and mounting details 4. Skid weights, number and sizes of anchoring locations and dimensions, wind and seismic load calculations, and flare moment calculations. B. Materials list: Provide a complete list of all materials and equipment proposed to be furnished and installed under this portion of the Work: 1 Make 2. Model 3. Part Number 4. List of Manufacturers for Parts 5. Expected lead time C. Plywood or City approved material template for flare mast support (base ring, structural members, etc.) and anchor bolt -hole location. D. Contractor shall prepare and deliver three copies of the Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Manuals. Additionally, the O&M manual shall be provided electronically in a searchable PDF format with hyperlinks in the Table of Contents to associated sections to the City on compact disc (CD) and include: 1. Field Summary for recommended Maintenance & Frequency 2. Table for recommended parts to keep in stock E. Contractor shall submit warranties for all equipment and material supplied for the work specified in this specification. 1.5 Product Handling A. Contractor shall deliver materials in manufacturer's original packaging with all tags and labels intact and legible. 1.6 LFG Flare System A. The LFG Flare System shall be a candlestick flare unitized and modular system including all piping, valves and components for a complete and operational system except for the HDPE pipe that will run between the equipment skid outlet and the flame arrestor. B. The LFG Flare shall be pre -piped and pre -wired to the extent possible, requiring minimal field assembly. C. The LFG Flare shall be rated for 400 to 4,000 SCFM, designed and manufactured in compliance with 40 CFR, Part 60.18, and shall include, but not be limited to, the following components which shall meet as a minimum the listed specifications: 1. Flame arrester: A minimum 12 -inch flame attester shall be provided for the inlet to the flare. The pressure drop it imposes on the system shall be a maximum of 2 inches w.c. The flame arrester shall be constructed with a cast aluminum housing with aluminum flame element. The flame arrester shall be manufactured by Groth, Varec, Enardo, or City approved equal. The flame arrester shall be provided with pressure monitoring such that both flare backpressure and "flare plus flame arrester" backpressure can be monitored. 2. Flare Shutdown Valve: A minimum 12 inch pneumatically -operated butterfly valve shall be provided, equipped with a 316 stainless steel disk, stem and Teflon seat. The operator shall be provided as a spring -fail -close device and shall close when directed by a logic in less than 2 seconds. 3. Mass flow measurement device manufactured by Fluid Components International, LLC; Sage; Thermal Instruments; Kurz Instruments, Inc.; or City approved equal. The output from this device shall be converted to a 4- 20mADC signal and transmitted to the PLC for flow input into digital chart recorder. 4. Flare Stack: The flare mast shall have the following properties and accessories: a. The flare stack shall be fabricated from A53 -B carbon steel pipe. The stack shall be self-supporting by an A-36 base ring or structural members with pre- engineered bolt holes sized for stack diameter, height, and wind load. b. The inlet shall be a 90° entrance into the stack. c. The inlet shall project a minimum of 10 inches from the stack and terminate with a 150# ANSI FFSO flange inlet to which the flame arrestor assembly shall be attached. d. The inlet nozzle shall contain one (1) 1/2" FNPT connection on the top of the nozzle for a temperature switch to be mounted. e. A carbon steel inclined floor plate at least 4" below the lowest part of the inlet connection shall be seal welded to the interior of the stack with one (1) 1" 3000# FNPT connection located as a low point drain connection above the inclined plate, on the down slope side. f. The flare mast assembly shall include provision for mounting local junction boxes, ignition transfer box, and propane pilot gas train components. g. The flare mast shall include "uni-strut" type mounting accommodation for the installation of conduit and piping as is required to service the upper levels of the flare assembly. 5. Flare Tip and Shroud: The flare tip assembly shall have the following properties and accessories: a. The flare tip shall be a minimum length of 5 feet, 304 stainless steel, schedule 10S pipe of the same diameter as that of the carbon steel flare stack. b. The flare tip shall be continuously welded to the carbon steel flare stack with a 309 stainless steel weld. c. The flare tip shall incorporate integral flame retention for increased flame stability. d. The flare shroud shall be fabricated from 309/310 stainless steel. The piping shall have attached a minimum of three continuously welded stainless steel attachment supports for the stainless steel shroud. e. The flare shroud shall be designed to induct the proper amount of air into the flame zone for stable combustion throughout the flow range. The free net nozzle area shall be such that the velocities specified in 40 CFR §60.18 are satisfied within the ranges of the specified loading rates. f. The flare tip shall have two (2) type K thermocouple assemblies with 310 stainless steel sheathing. Each thermocouple shall be located such that it detects the main flame throughout the entire design operating range. 6. Pilot Assembly: The pilot assembly shall have the following properties and accessories: a. The pilot shall be spark ignited. b. The spark plug shall be located in a position that is not considered a "low point," which can collect water. c. The pilot shall consist of an ignition rod internal to the pilot assembly and shall be weatherproof such that rain or condensation will not cause the ignition rod to "arc out" in a location other than the pilot tip. d. The arc (spark) that ignites the flare pilot shall be located at the pilot tip, such that the base of the pilot flame is directly adjacent to the arc (spark). e. The pilot shall consist of a cast iron self-inspirating capable of achieving the air/gas mixture required for proper pilot flame stability. The educator shall have a windshield around the inlet air opening such that a cross -wind will not affect the operation of the pilot. f. The gas inlet connection to the pilot educator shall be 1/2" FNPT. g. The pilot tip shall be made from stainless steel and shall be positioned such that the main flare tip is ignited easily. h. The enclosure for the ignition transformer shall meet NEMA 4 criteria and shall receive the 120 VAC power and hi -tension conduits. 7. Finish: High temperature primer over sand -blast prepared metal. Sand blasting shall be to SPC SP -6 guidelines. Stainless steel portions do not require coatings. D. Flare Seguence of Normal jAutomatic Model Operation: 1. With the PILOT, SHUTDOWN VALVE, and BLOWER mode switches in the "AUTO" position, turn the FLARE SYSTEM switch from "OFF" to "AUTO". 2. The pilot solenoid valve opens and the spark igniter energizes for up to 1 minute (adjustable) to ignite the pilot gas. 3. The blower starts following and operator -adjustable time delay and pilot proved indication. 4. The safety shutdown valve begins to open following an adjustable time delay after the blower has started. 5. LFG is presented to the burner, and normal operation is achieved. 6. If flare fails to reach normal operating temperature within an adjustable time delay, the system experiences a shutdown, and after an adjustable time delay has elapsed, begins a re -light attempt. The operator may select the number of re -light attempts prior to a "FLAME FAILURE" shutdown. 7. Should the inlet valve fail to close upon logic or manual operator selection demand, the system shall shutdown send a signal to annunciate "inlet Valve Fail." This shutdown shall require operator attention for remediation and manual restart. 8. The flare system may be operated in the "AUTO VACUUM", "AUTO FLOW RATE" or "AUTO TIMER" modes of operation. In the "AUTO TIMER" mode, the operator can select the "ON Time -of -Day" and "OFF Time -of -Day" inputs. In the "AUTO PRESSURE" mode, the operator can select the option to run the "AUTO VACUUM" mode concurrently, as well as "FLARE" mode standby auto and auto timer mode. These operational modes, as well as other control conditions and set -points are selectable on the "Touch Screen" operator interface device mounted on the front of the control panel. 1.7 Gas Handling System A. The Gas Handling System shall be equipped with the components described, including all piping and valves for a complete and operational system. B. Performance and Design Requirements: 1. The gas handling system shall be fabricated with two 2,000 SCFM blowers and Variable Frequency Drives (VFD), including piping, valves, primary demister, and any other necessary incidentals thereto. The skid shall be fabricated, including PLC programming and necessary input and output modules to allow the installation of a third 2,000 SCFM blower and VFD by the same manufacturer at some time in the future. 2. LFG blower(s): Blowers shall be designed for use with and in the presence of LFG. The blowers shall be VFD, multi -stage centrifugal devices, with cast iron ends and sections, and aluminum cast impellers. The blowers shall be designed with a highly effective shaft seal, and shall be designed for direct - coupled VFD controlled applications. The blowers shall be capable of exerting at least 60 -inch water column (WC) vacuum at the suction side, and shall deliver at least 20 -inch WC positive pressure, including all system parasitic restrictions, throughout the full design range of this specification. The blower end and sections shall be provided with a protective Heresite coating. 3. Motor: The blowers shall be furnished with a 60 Hertz, 3-phase, 480 volt, TEFC enclosures, squirrel -cage induction motors with 1.15 minimum service factors, and shall be factory mounted with the blowers. The motors shall be rated for service with a VFD. Motor HPs shall be sufficient to operate the blowers throughout their design ranges. a. Variable Frequency Drive 1VFD1: i. VFDs suitable for control of the blower/motor assemblies shall be provided. The VFDs shall be capable of controlling the blower motors by either a manually selected speed control or by a 4-20 mADC signal provided by the flow rate or landfill vacuum monitoring system(s). ii. The VFDs shall be equipped with line reactors and 480V surge protection to prevent damage due to power fluctuations and sudden loss of power. iii. iii. The operator shall be able to select a desired LFG flow rate or landfill vacuum at the operator interface console (Touch Screen), and the VFDs will automatically control the blower speed to maintain vacuum or flow. b. Accessories: i. The blowers shall be furnished with vibration sensors, mounted on or near the driven end bearing housing assemblies of the blowers, and shall develop an output of 4-20 mADC representative of in/sec vibrations from the blowers. The PLC shall accept this signal, and shall process the signal for touch screen display as well as adjustable alarm and shutdown levels. ii. Stainless steel valves and tubing (appropriately sized) shall be installed on the bottom of the blowers to drain condensate. c. Installation: All piping will be supported to preclude the possibility of exerting undue forces and moments on the blower flanges. Suitable flexible connectors will be furnished to isolate the blower from the piping system. Each unit shall be mounted flat and level on the gas handling system steel main skid. d. Experience: The blowers shall be manufactured in the United States. Compressor manufacturers shall have a minimum five years' experience in 1 the design and manufacture of this type of equipment and have a minimum of 25 operating installations in the United States. e. Acceptable Manufactures: 1. Atlas Copco 2. Hibon (Ingersoll Rand) 3. Continental Blower, LLC. 4. Gardner Denver/Lamson 4. Primary Demister Filter: The demister filter enclosure shall be completely fabricated from high-density polyethylene (HDPE), 304L stainless steel, or other City approved material. It shall be of a vertical, cylindrical design with element removal from the top. The top shall be a flanged top with stainless steel QED Easy Bolts. Nozzle flanges shall meet ANSI 125# specifications. The demister shall be able to remove 100% of droplets > 10 micron and shall also remove Particulates having a density equal to or greater than water which are > 10 micron in size. 5. At the design flow rates, temperatures and pressures, the demister shall not have a clean pressure drop greater than 2 in. WC. The demister/filter vessel shall be capable of withstanding no less than 80 in. WC vacuum. a. Demister/Filter Elements: The demister/filter pad elements shall be manufactured from polypropylene fiber and woven pads. Over 90% of the fiber shall be perpendicular to the flow of the gas. There shall be three groups of pads. Each group of pads shall have the following number of layers, gauge size fibers and percent void space: 15t - 4 layers/37/97; 2nd — 5 layers/16/96; and 3rd — 4 layers/8/96. b. Condensate Removal: There shall be a minimum 2 -inch IPS flange connection in the bottom of the filter for condensate removal. c. Pressure drop monitoring There shall be two minimum -sized 'A -inch pipe couplings in the side of the filter, one each upstream and downstream of the filter element material, for the purpose of connecting a differential pressure monitoring device. The vessel shall be provided with a differential pressure gauge installed with valving for isolation and atmospheric calibration. d. The demister/filter system shall be equipped with a level switch for monitoring high condensate level in the base of the vessel. e. Experience: Demister/Filter assemblies shall be manufactured in the United States. Manufacturers shall have a minimum of 5 years' and shall have a minimum of 10 units operating successfully on LFG in this country. f. The demister/filter assembly shall be located, installed and pre -plumbed on the gas handling system skid. 6. Butterfly Valves: Butterfly Valves in the gas piping shall be gear operated, lug type, cast iron -bodied valves with Buna resilient seats and stainless steel disc and shaft. No Part of the cast iron body shall be in contact with the LFG. The shaft seals shall be designed for the LFG service. Valves shall be selected for a minimum pressure of 50 PSIG. At a minimum, appropriately sized butterfly valves shall be installed in the suction and discharge piping to proposed blowers. 7. Check Valves: Check valves shall be water type, double door, aluminum - bodied, with Buna seats, Technocheck 5412 or City approved equal. Check valves shall be installed on each blower discharge. 8. Piping: All piping on the gas handling skid shall be of a material sufficient for imposed loads and heat radiation from the flare (HDPE, schedule 10 304L stainless steel, or City approved material). The same specification shall apply to tees, elbows, wyes, etc., except that carbon steel flanges may be used provided the piping is provided with welded stainless steel stub ends. All flanges shall conform to ANSI 125# drilling specifications. All welding of piping and appurtenances shall conform to the appropriate applicable material specifications. 9. Flexible Connectors: System piping shall be provided where required to relieve expansion and/or vibration stresses with rubber flex connectors, connected to the stainless steel flanges using stainless steel backup rings and bolts. At a minimum, these devices shall be employed at the inlet and outlet of each blower. 10. Packaging: The complete gas handling system shall be designed and manufactured as a pre-packaged, pre -plumbed, pre-conduited, pre -wired and factory pre -tested system. 11.Structural Skid: The structural skid shall be manufactured from ASTM A-36 structural members. The sizes, weights and shapes of the structural members shall be engineered to support all assemblies and sub -assemblies in loading, transport and operation. Design, criteria for the structure(s) shall be 130 mph wind overturn loading (IBC, Inland I, Corpus Christi, Texas) and zone 4 seismic loading. All welding shall be accomplished per American Welding Society Section 1.1. 12. Gauges and Instrumentation Transmitters ( Transducers: Where direct read-out pressure gauges are required, Dwyer Capsuhelic or City approved equal shall be employed, and shall be selected in appropriate ranges and/or scales. Where analog transmitters / transducers are required for installation on the system process piping or in the control panels(s) for compliant control, such transducers shall be provided and installed as 2 -wire, 4-20 mADC devices. Pressure, vacuum and differential pressure transducers shall be provide as ITT/Barton, Rosemount, Honeywell products. For temperature signals, thermocouple type sensing devices selected for the appropriate temperature ranges are acceptable, with the thermocouple EMF signals processed in the system PLC. The minimum required list of devices for this system are: a. Landfill vacuum gauge. b. LFG temperature gauge, 4-1/2" dial. c. Landfill vacuum transmitter. d. Demister differential pressure gauge. e. Common blower discharge pressure gauges. f. Common blower discharge temperature gauges, 4 1/2 dial. g. Blower inlet bearing vibration transmitters. h. Flame arrester pressure gauge and thermocouple. 13. Combination Methane and Oxygen Analyzer: A LANDTEC / QED GA3000 PLUS or City approved equal combined package, providing continuous measurement of percent oxygen, carbon dioxide and total volume percent methane shall be installed. Methane and carbon dioxide detection occurs with a microprocessor based analyzer utilizing dual wavelength, non -dispersive infrared absorption. Oxygen detection occurs with a microprocessor based analyzer utilizing a micro -fuel cell. The unit shall be field configurable and with 4-20 mA output signals and interposing relays for any alarm or recording interfacing. 14.Two Field Methane and Oxygen Analyzers: LNOTEC or City approved equal. 1.8 Control Panel Instrumentation, and Operational Logic A. General: The control panel for the system shall be compliant with NEMA 12/3R specifications at a minimum. The panel shall be equipped with a sun/rain shield that extends 3 feet from the panel on the door side and 2 feet from each end of the panel. The control panel shall be fully pre -wired to the extent possible by the Contractor. The complete control system shall be specifically designed for the performance of the electrical and logical control requirements of this project. The control panel shall bear the official UL label confirming UL classification as a "Flame Control Panel". The panel shall include at a minimum, but not be limited to, the following components. 1. A load center for all motors, fixtures, controls, and devices included with the system. The electrical system shall include voltage transformer9s), disconnects, main and branch circuit protectors and any other protection and/or control devices required for complete operation of the system based on a single electrical service supply of 480 VAC, 3 -Phase, 60 Hz. 2. Panel Temperature Control: The electrical motor control panel(s) and/or the logical control panels shall be provided with thermostatically controlled heating and cooling systems as required to provide proper operation of all motor control and logical supervisory control sub -systems. 3. A PLC based control center (CompactLogix or City approved equal) to receive all the signals from the various safeties, controls and monitoring equipment, and to automatically control all the various components of the system. The PLC system shall be capable of Ethernet communication. The PLC system shall be connected to a remote telemetry system, such that the control system can be viewed remotely by authorized personnel. The PLC shall be capable of being integrated with a future landfill gas -to -energy facility to be installed in the future. 4. An operator interface panel (OIP), C -More EA9-T6CL or City approved equal to allow either manual or automatic selection for the control of the operational components of the system (set point changes, status, alarms, shutdown indications, etc.). Such operator interface shall be provided as a "Touch Screen", shall have Ethernet and USB capabilities, and shall be fully compatible with the PLC and shall be designed for industrial duty application. 5. A Yokogawa FX1006 digital process order City approved equal capable of collecting, accumulating, storing and presenting digital records (flare flow, temperature, vacuum, discharge pressure, and two spares) of monitored systems shall be installed by the Contractor. The device shall also have Ethernet capability for remote monitoring, internal storage capacity of 400 MB, capability to save to a compact flash memory card. The process recorder shall be connected to the PLC. 6. One (1) 8 -port managed Ethernet Switch (N-TRON) 708TX or equal) shall be installed within the control panel. All devices will be programmed to a common IP mask and network prior to delivery. 7. Safeties: The system shall be equipped with the following safeties as a minimum: a. Blower motor over -current and vibration. b. Blower motor undercurrent (surge). c. Flame failure. d. High condensate level for demister. e. Control panel 120v surge protection and universal power supply (UPS) for control panel and associated components. 8. Control Panel Face Mounted Devices: The system shall be equipped with the following control panel face mounted devices as a minimum. a. Remote telemetry system comprised of one (1) FleetZoomFZ400 or City approved equal, including monitoring services for one year. This device must be capable of transmitting up to 14 digital inputs, 10 analog inputs and 4 digital outputs. PLC shall provide necessary outputs for connection to the FZ400 10 analog inputs. Some of these inputs may be shared outputs to the digital chart recorder. b. Alarm and shutdown message annunciation (touchscreen display) c. Load center circuit breakers as required for full system operation. d. Blower selector switch. e. Test/Off/Auto switch for the blowers. f. Test/Off/Auto switch for the system. g. Open/Closed/Auto switch for the flare shutdown valve. h. Flame failure annunciation for the flare (touch screen). i. Shutdown valve failure annunciation (touch screen). j. Low LFG flow rate annunciation (touch screen). k. Test/Off/Auto switch for the pilot ignition system. I. Flame failure reset. 1.9 Start-up and Testing A. Factory Test 1. The entire system, including all controls shall be tested at the Contractor's plant before shipment. Complete test reports shall be made available to the City which shall show all system controls operate correctly prior to shipment. B. Start-up 1. The Contractor shall furnish a factory trained Technician and Operations Engineer, if necessary, for a minimum of 3 days of start-up demonstration and testing, in accordance with Scope of Work Part G. Personnel training shall be performed on the 3rd day of the start-up demonstration and testing. The Technician will remain on site until start-up of the system has been completed to the City's satisfaction. C. Functional and Validation Tests 1. Upon completion of the installation functional and validation tests shall be performed by the Contractor with the assistance of the Installer. The Contractor shall demonstrate compliant operation of the systems to the City's satisfaction, including but not limited to sensor, instrumentation, electrical components, mechanical components, etc. Should the system NOT perform to the requirements of this specification, the expense of any re -testing, if required, will be borne by the responsible entity (i.e., either Installer or the Contractor), as determined by the City. D. Instructions 1. When all required approvals of this portion of the work have been obtained, and at a time designated by the City, the Contractor shall thoroughly demonstrate to the City and selected representatives of the City the operation and maintenance of all items installed under this specification. 2. The instructions shall be separate from the installation, start-up, and equipment adjustment services. 1.10 Work Site and Conditions The work shall be performed at the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill located at 2397 County Road 20, Robstown, Texas (Entrance at the intersection of Farm to Market Road 2444 and County Road 20). 1.11 Contractor quality Control and Superintendence The Contractor shall establish and maintain a complete Quality Control Program that is acceptable to the Contract Administrator to assure that the requirements of the Contract are provided as specified. The Contractor will also provide supervision of the work to insure it complies with the contract requirements. Attachment B: Bid / Pricing Schedule CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI BID FORM PURCHASING DIVISION RFB No. 184 Landfill Gas Blower / Flare for the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Date: P71 :2 1 /.249/ (17_ �J Au lho(ized Bidder: l �rneJ 1/c 45 7nC, Signature PAGE 1 OF 1 L Refer to "Instructions to Bidders" and Contract Terms and Conditions before completing bid. 2. Quote your best price for each item. Cost includes all work outlined in the scope of work including start-up and testing. 3. In submitting this bid, Bidder certifies that: a. The prices in this bid have been arrived of independently, without consultation, communication, or agreement with any other Bidder or competitor, for the purpose of restricting competition with regard to prices; b. Bidder is an Equal Opportunity Employer; and the Disclosure of Interest information on file with City's purchasing office, pursuant to the Code of Ordinances. is current and true c. Bidder is current with all taxes due and company is in good standing with all required governmental agencies. d. Bidder acknowledges receipt and review of all addenda for this RFB. Item Description UNIT QTY Total Price 1 Landfill Gas Blower / Flare LS 1 S ) 7 I , /-175. G4 Attachment C: Insurance Requirements CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY INSURANCE A. Contractor must not commence work under this contract until all insurance required has been obtained_and such insurance has been approved by the City. Contractor must not allow any subcontractor, to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. B. Contractor must furnish to the City's Risk Manager and Contract Administrator one (1) copy of Certificates of Insurance with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies by endorsement, and a waiver of subrogation endorsement is required on GL, AL and WC if applicable. Endorsements must be provided with Certificate of Insurance. Project name and/or number must be listed in Description Box of Certificate of Insurance. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -day advance written notice of cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination required on all certificates and policies. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate _ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises - Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,600 Aggregate $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non -Owned 3. Rented/Leased WORKERS'S COMPENSATION (All States Endorsement if Company is not domiciled in Texas) Employers Liability Statutory and complies with Part II of this Exhibit. $500,000/$500,000/$500,000 C. In the event of accidents of any kind related to this contract, Contractor must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Applicable for paid employees, Contractor must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers' compensation coverage provided must be in statutory amounts according to the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation. An All States Endorsement shall be required if Contractor is not domiciled in the State of Texas. B. Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Contractor's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. C. Contractor shall be required to submit renewal certificates of insurance throughout the term of this contract and any extensions within 10 days of the policy expiration dates. All notices under this Exhibit shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 D. Contractor agrees that, with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • List the City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, as additional insureds by endorsement with regard to operations, completed operations, and activities of or on behalf of the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; • Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and • Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any, cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination in coverage and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. E. Within five (5) calendar days of a cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination of coverage, Contractor shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Contractor's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. F In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Contractor's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Contractor to stop work hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. G. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contractor's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this contract. FI. It is agreed that Contractor's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this contract. I. It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this contract. 2016 Insurance Requirements Utilities Gas Flare Delivery 10/26/2016 my Risk Management Attachment C: Bond Requirements No bond required for the Service Agreement Attachment D: Warranty Requirements The equipment to be free from defects in material or workmanship for 18 months from date of notification to ship or 12 months after start-up whichever occurs first. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Parnel Biogas Inc Tulsa, OK United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2017-150819 Date Filed: 01/05/2017 ,Date Acknowledged: 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. 951 Landfill Gas Flare Blower Project Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Parker, Jeff Tulsa, OK United States 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. a AH-IDAVIT Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary x Notary PYNia State of Oklahoma CASEY CLUMP TULSA COUNTY COMMISSION Comm, x�t0t10 AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. Si e of authorized agent of contracting business entity Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said ' f ' Pet r ]� , this the .. 11) day of0.1, h 20 ' 7 , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. Signature of cer administers g oath �4S C/im 1J w Gcco&nt- Rcp Printed name of cer administerin oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www. ethics.state.tx. us Version V1.0.277 Gas Collection and Control System (GCCS) and Landfill Flare Council Presentation January 24, 2017 feline 1 er 2007 Description of Events Cefe Valenzuela Landfill opens. 2008 First NMOCs report showed calculated emissions rate <50Mg/yr. First NMOC testing showed NMOC emission rate <50Mg/yr. ) NMOC testing showed NMOC emission rate <50Mg/yr. Results were valid for 5 years 5 NMOC testing showed NMOC emission rate >50Mg/yr. Project included in CIP. 2016 SCS/City personnel met to begin gas system planning. 016 6 Design proposal further refined. Design contract in place, final schedule formalized to meet design, bidding, procurement, and construction milestones. Surface Scan performed to confirm one last time the results. 2016 Gas System Designs and bid package completed. er 2016 Pre-bid held to kick off construction of GCCS. Bids went out for Flare fabrication. er 2016 Bids came in for GCCS construction and Flare fabrication. NMOC=Non-Methane Organic Compound ssues with Developing Landfill Gas -to -Energy Jse at Cefe ndfill Gas-to- ergy Use Current Issues with Developing at e e rbon Credits ctric Generation edium-Btu Gas tura) Gas oduction hicle Fuel (CNG • Not available since gas system is required by rule and not voluntary • Carbon credits currently have little to no value in the U.S. • Cost to purchase equipment and generate green power from the combustion of landfill gas requires selling electricity for 6 cents kW/hr • In Texas, no more than "avoided cost" will be offered by utilities and this is currently under 4 cents kW/hr • Also, Texas has no rules allowing for "net metering," which would allow the City to offset their own usage through generation at the landf • State's renewal portfolio goals are met through wind generation • No close natural gas users (pipeline would be miles long making not economically feasible) • Natural gas prices are currently low (generally $2-$4 MMBtu spot pricing), companies are not interested in paying a premium to use "gre( gas" • Landfill gas requires cleanup for use in industrial boilers, etc. such that many businesses are not interested due to added maintenance ani other difficulties which further escalates the cost to use landfill gas • Millions in capital costs and specialized operating experience required to setup a refining facility to create natural gas from landfill gas • Cefe is not projected to be producing enough landfill gas for approximately 10 more years to justify consideration of this type of project • In the future, however, this may become a viable option since once the capital cost of the refining equipment is justified, developers can currently create renewable fuel credits and receive upwards of $20 MMBtu (current normal natural gas spot pricing is at $2-$4 MMBtu) • Same obstacles as for other natural gas uses, expensive equipment to refine landfill gas into compressed natural gas when natural gas pri are so low • City of Corpus Christi specifically has access to low natural gas prices from City utility • Better economics of refining into natural gas, placing in a natural gas pipeline, and creating a fuel credit transaction as shown above than direct vehicle fuel JS EPA Non-compliance Fines Fines are site specific complex formula. It is estimated that it could reach $5,000 per day and still be required to build the landfill Gas Extraction System. QU ESTI ONS? AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of January 31, 2017 DATE: December 21, 2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager markvv@cctexas.com (361) 826-3897 Valerie H. Gray, P. E., Executive Director of Public Works valerieg@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: J. H. Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 CAPTION: Lawrence Mikolajczyk, Director of Solid Waste Operations LawM@cctexas.com (361) 826-1972 Construction Contract and Professional Services Contract Cefe F. Valenzuela Landfill Gas Collection and Control System (Capital Improvement Project) Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Tri Con Works, LLC. of Houston, Texas in the amount of $1,019,690 for the Cefe F. Valenzuela Landfill (CFVL) Gas Collection and Control System (GCCS) for the total base bid and to execute a contract for Construction Phase Engineering and Quality Assurance Services with SCS Engineers, Inc. from Austin, Texas in the amount of $268,000 for full-time construction management. (Capital Improvement Project) PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is to obtain authority to execute a construction contract and a professional services contract for full-time construction phase support on the CFVL GCCS. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: CFVL is the City's newest and only active landfill and is considered a Regional Landfill with the capacity to serve the Coastal Bend and other adjacent areas. CFVL has been in operation for 9 years, since the official closure of J. C. Elliott Landfill. As the incoming waste is managed and properly landfilled, it naturally decomposes and produces landfill gases, primarily methane. Methane is a greenhouse gas that is regulated by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (See Attached Contract with SCS Engineers) The GCCS consists of a series of vertical wells. The flare was procured by separate action to expedite the procurement of the flare, and to save overhead and markup expenses. SCS was previously selected to provide ongoing technical and administrative support for the City's two landfill operations and air compliance permitting. SCS will be providing full-time construction phase support throughout the project. On December 14, 2016, the City received proposals from five (5) bidders and the bid is as follows: Contractor Base Bid Tri Con Works, LLC Houston, Texas $1,019,690.00 American Environmental Group, LTD. Richfield, Ohio $1,374,325.00 CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. Baton Rouge, Louisiana $1,397,740.00 Belair Builders, Inc. New Brighton, Minnesota $1,964,545.00 Landmarc Environmental System, LLC. Naperville, Illinois $1,348,762.80 Engineer's Estimate $1,525,360.00 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize execution of a construction contract and a contract for professional services. (Recommended) 2. Do not authorize execution of a construction contract nor a contract for professional services. (Not Recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: The City currently flares the landfill gas at the closed J.C. Elliot (former municipal) Landfill. The City has attempted to develop a commercial gas to energy project at J.C. Elliot since 2005, but has not been successful due to the low market prices of gas. The flare assembly in this item is designed to allow for the development of a gas -to -energy project in future should it become economically feasible in the future. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Complies with statutory requirements for construction contracts. Conforms to FY 2016-2017 Capital Improvement Planning (CIP) Budget. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Solid Waste Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue X Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Budget $2,500,000 $2,500,000 Encumbered / Expended Amount This item $1,287,690 $1,287,690 Future Anticipated Expenditures This Project 186,774 186,774 BALANCE $1,025,536 $1,025,536 Fund(s): Solid Waste Certificates of Obligation issued FY 2017. Comments: The remaining balance will be used for the Flare purchase and other Solid Waste capital expenses required throughout the year. RECOMMENDATION: SCS Engineers, and City staff, recommend award of a construction contract to Tri Con Works, LLC. in the amount of $1,019,690. Staff is also recommending a professional services contract with SCS Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $268,000 for construction oversight during installation of the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Gas Collection and Control system. The award recommendation for construction is based on the determination that Tri Con Works, LLC. was the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Project Budget Location Map Contract for Professional Services Presentation Form 1295 — Tri Con Works, LLC Form 1295 — SCS Engineers Letter of Recommendation PROJECT BUDGET ESTIMATE Cefe F Valenzuela Landfill Gas Collection and Control System PROJECT FUNDS AVAILABLE: Landfill CIP $ 2,500,000 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 2,500,000 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction Fees 1,121,659 Construction (Tri Con Works) THIS ITEM 1,019,690 Contingency (10%) 101,969 Construction Inspection and Testing Fees 278,244 Quality Assurance Engineer (SCS Engineers) 268,000 Construction - Materials Testing Services (Estimate) 10,244 Design Fees 40,000 Engineering Design (SCS Engineers) 40,000 Reimbursement Fees 34,561 Contract Administration (Eng. Svcs Admin/Finance/Capital Budget) 12,908 Engineering Services (Project Mgt/Constr Mgt) 20,653 Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 1,000 TOTAL $ 1,474,464 * ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE $ 1,025,536 * Will be used for the Flare purchase and other required Solid Waste capital expenses. Fetr:riL (474 Tierra Grande ❑R 2❑ Pr ❑M ❑❑ Corpus Christi ❑M 2 ❑❑❑ LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE Chapman Tich Pr❑ #. �I ❑❑ ❑�: E162 Cefe F. Valenzuela Landfill Gas Collection and Control System CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Corpus Chr sti Engineering Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Gas Collection and Control System Council Presentation January 24, 2017 Project Location �hrsti Engineering 2 Project Vicinity �hrsti Engineering North San Pedro Robstown Spring Garden -Terra Verde 0 La Palorna-Lost Greek 7i Tierra Grande Driscoll Petrrsaila CR 20 Cefe F. Valenzuela Landfill Gas Collection and Control System FM 70 FM 2444 Corpus Christi 358 Chapman Ranch Project Scope �hrsti Engineering • Cefe F. Valenzuela Landfill has been open for approximately 7 years. • Landfill gas production has exceed the regulatory threshold. • This project constructs a Gas Collection and Control System to comply with regulations. • The system will gather and flare gas produced by the landfill. • The Gas Collection and Control System must be in place and operational by the regulatory deadline of November 11, 2017. • Failure to meet the regulatory deadline result in non-compliance and daily fines. • The current compliance record at the landfill is spotless. 4 Project Schedule 4000 Corpus Chr sti Engineering 2016 2017 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Bid/Award Mar] Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct L Construction B Project Estimate: Calendar Days 233 r.:', 8 Months CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CONTRACT FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE SERVICES FOR PROJECT E16289 Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Gas Collection and Control System The City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home rule municipal corporation, P.O. Box 9277, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas 78469-9277 (City) acting through its duly authorized City Manager or Designee (Director) and SCS Engineers, Inc., a Virginia corporation, 1901 Central Drive, Suite 550, Bedford, Texas 76021-5872, (Consultant), hereby agree as follows: TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE NO. TITLE PAGE ARTICLE I SCOPE OF SERVICES 2 ARTICLE II QUALITY CONTROL 2 ARTICLE III COMPENSATION 3 ARTICLE IV TIME AND PERIOD OF SERVICE 4 ARTICLE V OPINIONS OF COST 5 ARTICLE VI INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 5 ARTICLE VII INDEMNIFICATION 5 ARTICLE VIII TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 6 ARTICLE IX RIGHT OF REVIEW AND AUDIT 6 ARTICLE X OWNER REMEDIES 7 ARTICLE XI CONSULTANT REMEDIES 8 ARTICLE XII CLAIMS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION 8 ARTICLE XIII MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 9 EXHIBITS Contract for Professional Services Page 1 of 11 ARTICLE I — SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.1 The Consultant shall provide to Engineering Services its Scope of Services, to be incorporated herein and attached to this Agreement as Exhibit A. The Scope of Services shall include all associated services required for Consultant to provide such Services, pursuant to this Agreement, and any and all Services that would normally be required by law or common due diligence in accordance with the standard of care defined in Article XIII of this Agreement. 1.2 Consultant shall comply with City standards, as specified in the Unified Development Code (UDC) or Code of Ordinances at the time of the execution of the contract, throughout the duration of the Project, unless specifically and explicitly excluded from doing so in the approved Scope of Services attached as Exhibit A. A request made by either party to deviate from City standards after the contract is executed must be in writing. 1.3 Consultant shall provide labor, equipment and transportation necessary to complete all services agreed to hereunder in a timely manner throughout the term of the Agreement. Persons retained by Consultant to perform work pursuant to this Agreement shall be employees or subconsultants of Consultant. Consultant must provide City with a list of all subconsultants that includes the services performed by subconsultant and the % of work performed by subconsultant. Changes in Consultant's team that provides services under this Agreement must be agreed to by the City in writing. 1.4 Consultant shall not begin work on any phase/task authorized under this Agreement until they are briefed on the scope of the Project and are notified in writing to proceed. If the scope of the Project changes, either Consultant or City may request a review of the changes with an appropriate adjustment in compensation. 1.5 Consultant will provide monthly status updates (project progress or delays) in the format requested by the City with each monthly invoice. 1.6 For design services, Consultant agrees to render the professional services necessary for the advancement of the Project through Final Completion of the Construction Contract. Consultant acknowledges and accepts its responsibilities, as defined and described in City's General Conditions for Construction Contracts, excerpt attached as Exhibit F. 1.6.1 The Consultant agrees to serve as the City's Designer as defined in the General Conditions and will consult and advise the City on matters related to the Consultant's Scope of Services during the performance of the Consultant's services. 1.6.2 The Consultant agrees to prepare plans, specification, bid and contract documents and to analyze bids and evaluate the documents submitted by bidders in order to make an informed, written recommendation to City concerning the responsibilities of the lowest bidders. In determining a bidder's responsibilities, factors considered include, without limitation, the bidder's experience, capacity, supervision, ability to maintain project budget and schedule, past performance and safety record. ARTICLE II — QUALITY CONTROL 2.1 The Consultant agrees to perform quality assurance -quality control/constructability reviews (QCP Review). The City reserves the right to retain a separate consultant to perform additional QCP services for the City. 2.2 The Consultant will perform QCP Reviews at intervals during the Project to ensure deliverables satisfy applicable industry quality standards and meet the requirements of the Project scope. Based on the findings of the QCP Review, the Consultant must reconcile the Project Scope and the Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC), as needed. Contract for Professional Services Page 2 of 11 2.3 Final construction documents that do not meet City standards may be rejected. Consultant will not be compensated for having to resubmit documents. ARTICLE III — COMPENSATION 3.1 The Compensation for all services (Basic and Additional) included in this Agreement and in the Scope of Services for this Agreement shall not exceed $268,000. 3.2 The Consultant's fee will be on a lump sum or time and materials (T&M) basis as detailed in Exhibit A and will be full and total compensation for all services and for all expenses incurred in performing these services. Consultant shall submit a Rate Schedule, as shown in Exhibit B-1, with their proposal. City and Consultant agree that the Rate Schedule is considered confidential information that may be excluded from public disclosure under Texas Government Code Chapter 552 as determined by the Texas Attorney General. 3.3 The Consultant agrees to complete the Scope of Services in accordance with the approved project schedule and budget as defined in Exhibit A, including completing the work in phases defined therein. 3.4 The Director of Engineering Services may request the Consultant to undertake additional services or tasks provided that no increase in fee is required. Services or tasks requiring an increase of fee will be mutually agreed and evidenced in writing as an amendment to this contract. Consultant shall notify the City within three (3) days of notice if tasks requested requires an additional fee. 3.5 Monthly invoices will be submitted in accordance with the Payment Request as shown in Exhibit B. Each invoice will include the Consultant's estimate of the proportion of the contracted services completed at the time of billing. For work performed on a T&M Basis, the invoice shall include documentation that shows who worked on the Project, the number of hours that each individual worked, the applicable rates from the Rate Schedule and any reimbursable expenses associated with the work. City will make prompt monthly payments in response to Consultant's monthly invoices. 3.6 Principals may only bill at the agreed hourly rate for Principals (as defined in the Rate Schedule) when acting in that capacity. Principals acting in the capacity of staff must bill at applicable staff rates. 3.7 Consultant certifies that title to all services covered by a Payment Request shall pass to City no later than the time of payment. Consultant further certifies that, upon submittal of a Payment Request, all services for which Payment Requests have been previously issued and payments received from City shall, to the best of Consultant's knowledge, information and belief, be free and clear of liens, claims, security interests or encumbrances in favor of Consultant or other persons or entities making a claim by reason of having provided labor or services relating to this Agreement. CONSULTANT SHALL INDEMNIFY AND HOLD CITY HARMLESS FROM ANY LIENS, CLAIMS, SECURITY INTERESTS OR ENCUMBRANCES FILED BY ANYONE CLAIMING BY, THROUGH OR UNDER THE ITEMS COVERED BY PAYMENTS MADE BY CITY TO CONSULTANT. 3.8 The final payment due hereunder shall not be paid until all reports, data and documents have been submitted, received, accepted and approved by City. Final billing shall indicate "Final Bill — no additional compensation is due to Consultant." 3.9 City may withhold compensation to such extent as may be necessary, in City's opinion, to protect City from damage or loss for which Consultant is responsible, because of: 3.9.1 delays in the performance of Consultant's work; 3.9.2 failure of Consultant to make payments to subconsultants or vendors for labor, materials or equipment; Contract for Professional Services Page 3 of 11 3.9.3 damage to City; or 3.9.4 persistent failure by Consultant to carry out the performance of its services in accordance with this Agreement. 3.10 When the above reasons for withholding are removed or remedied by Consultant, compensation of the amount withheld shall be made within 30 days. City shall not be deemed in default by reason of withholding compensation as provided under this Agreement. 3.11 In the event of any dispute(s) between the Parties regarding the amount properly compensable for any phase or as final compensation or regarding any amount that may be withheld by City, Consultant shall be required to make a claim pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and follow the procedures provided herein for the resolution of such dispute. In the event Consultant does not initiate and follow the claims procedures as required by the terms of this Agreement, any such claim shall be waived. 3.12 Request of final compensation by Consultant shall constitute a waiver of claims except those previously made in writing and identified by Consultant as unsettled at the time of final Payment Request. 3.13 All funding obligations of the City under this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of funds in its annual budget. The City may direct the Consultant to suspend work pending receipt and appropriation of funds. ARTICLE IV — TIME AND PERIOD OF SERVICE 4.1 This Agreement shall be effective upon the signature of the City Manager or designee (Effective Date). 4.2 This service shall be for a period of years beginning on the Effcctivc Datc. The Agrccmcnt may be renewed for up to one year renewal-eptionc upon mutual agreement of the parties to be evidenced in writing prior to the expiration date of the prior term. Any renewals shall be at the same terms an-€1-Gen-Glitlenc, plus any approved changes. 4.3 The Consultant agrees to begin work on those authorized Services for this contract upon receipt of the Notice to Proceed from the Director of Engineering Services. Work will not begin on any phase or any Additional Services until requested in writing by the Consultant and written authorization is provided by the Director of Engineering Services. 4.4 Time is of the essence for this Agreement. Consultant shall perform and complete its obligations under this Agreement in a prompt and continuous manner so as to not delay the Work for the Project, in accordance with the schedules approved by City. The Consultant and City are aware that many factors may affect the Consultant's ability to complete the services to be provided under this agreement. The Consultant must notify the City within three business days of becoming aware of a factor that may affect the Consultant's ability to complete the services hereunder. 4.5 City shall perform its obligations of review and approval in a prompt and continuous manner so as to not delay the project. 4.6 This Agreement shall remain in force for a period which may reasonably be required for completion of the Project, including any extra work and any required extensions thereto, unless terminated as provided for in this Agreement. For construction design services, "completion of the Project" refers to acceptance by the City of the construction phase of the Project, i.e., Final Completion. Contract for Professional Services Page 4 of 11 ARTICLE V — OPINIONS OF COST 5.1 The Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) is computed by the Consultant and includes the total cost for construction of the Project. 5.2 The OPC does not include the cost of the land, rights-of-way or other costs which are the responsibility of the City. 5.3 Since Consultant has no control over a construction contractor's cost of labor, materials or equipment, or over the contractor's methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, Consultant's opinions of probable Project Cost or Construction Cost provided herein are to be made on the basis of Consultant's experience and qualifications and represent Consultant's best judgment as a design professional familiar with the construction industry, but Consultant cannot and does not guarantee proposals, bids or the construction cost shall not vary from the OPC prepared by Consultant. 5.4 The OPC must be validated and/or updated with each deliverable. If construction bids exceed the OPC, the Consultant will redesign the project to be consistent with the OPC at no additional cost to City. ARTICLE VI — INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 6.1 Consultant must not commence work under this Agreement until all insurance required has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Consultant must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. 6.2 Insurance Requirements are shown in EXHIBIT C. ARTICLE VII — INDEMNIFICATION Consultant shall fully indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi and its officials, officers, agents, employees or other entity, excluding the engineer or architect or that person's agent, employee or subconsultant, over which the City exercises control ("Indemnitee") from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, to the extent that the damage is caused by or results from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property infringement or failure to pay a subcontractor or supplier committed by Consultant or its agent, Consultant under contract or another entity over which Consultant exercises control while in the exercise of rights or performance of the duties under this agreement. This indemnification does not apply to any liability resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the City or its employees, to the extent of such negligence. Consultant shall defend Indemnitee, with counsel satisfactory to the City Attorney, from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, if the claim is not based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee. If a claim is based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee, the Consultant shall reimburse the City's reasonable attorney's fees in proportion to the Consultant's liability. Contract for Professional Services Page 5 of 11 Consultant must advise City in writing within 24 hours of any claim or demand against City or Consultant known to Consultant related to or arising out of Consultant's activities under this Agreement. ARTICLE VIII — TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 8.1 By Consultant: 8.1.1 The City reserves the right to suspend this Agreement at the end of any phase for the convenience of the City by issuing a written and signed Notice of Suspension. The Consultant may terminate this Agreement for convenience in the event such suspension extends for a period beyond 120 calendar days by delivering a Notice of Termination to the City. 8.1.2 The Consultant must follow the Termination Procedure outlined in this Agreement. 8.2 By City: 8.2.1 The City may terminate this agreement for convenience upon seven days written notice to the Consultant at the address of record. 8.2.2 The City may terminate this agreement for cause upon ten days written notice to the Consultant. If Consultant begins, within three days of receipt of such notice, to correct its failure and proceeds to diligently cure such failure within the ten days, the agreement will not terminate. If the Consultant again fails to perform under this agreement, the City may terminate the agreement for cause upon seven days written notice to the Consultant with no additional cure period. If the City terminates for cause, the City may reject any and all proposals submitted by Consultant for up to two years. 8.3 Termination Procedure 8.3.1 Upon receipt of a Notice of Termination and prior to the effective date of termination, unless the notice otherwise directs or Consultant takes action to cure a failure to perform under the cure period, Consultant shall immediately begin the phase-out and discontinuance of all services in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Within 30 calendar days after receipt of the Notice of Termination, unless Consultant has successfully cured a failure to perform, Consultant shall submit a statement showing in detail the services performed under this Agreement prior to the effective date of termination. City retains the option to grant an extension to the time period for submittal of such statement. 8.3.2 Consultant shall submit all completed and/or partially completed work under this Agreement, including but not limited to specifications, designs, plans and exhibits. 8.3.3 Upon receipt of documents described in the Termination Procedure and absent any reason why City may be compelled to withhold fees, Consultant will be compensated for its services based upon a Time & Materials calculation or Consultant and City's estimate of the proportion of the total services actually completed at the time of termination. There will be no compensation for anticipated profits on services not completed. 8.3.4 Consultant acknowledges that City is a public entity and has a duty to document the expenditure of public funds. The failure of Consultant to comply with the submittal of the statement and documents, as required above, shall constitute a waiver by Consultant of any and all rights or claims to payment for services performed under this Agreement. ARTICLE IX — RIGHT OF REVIEW AND AUDIT 9.1 Consultant grants City, or its designees, the right to audit, examine or inspect, at City's election, all of Contract for Professional Services Page 6 of 11 Consultant's records relating to the performance of the Work under this Agreement, during the term of this Agreement and retention period herein. The audit, examination or inspection may be performed by a City designee, which may include its internal auditors or an outside representative engaged by City. Consultant agrees to retain its records for a minimum of four (4) years following termination of the Agreement, unless there is an ongoing dispute under this Agreement, then such retention period shall extend until final resolution of the dispute. 9.2 Consultant's records include any and all information, materials and data of every kind and character generated as a result of and relevant to the Work under this Agreement (Consultant's Records). Examples include billings, books, general ledger, cost ledgers, invoices, production sheets, documents, correspondence, meeting notes, subscriptions, agreements, purchase orders, leases, contracts, commitments, arrangements, notes, daily diaries, reports, drawings, receipts, vouchers, memoranda, time sheets, payroll records, policies, procedures, and any and all other agreements, sources of information and matters that may, in City's and Consultant's reasonable judgment, have any bearing on or pertain to any matters, rights, duties or obligations under or covered by any Agreement Documents. 9.3 City agrees that it shall exercise the right to audit, examine or inspect Consultant's Records only during Consultant's regular business hours. Consultant agrees to allow City's designee access to all of Consultant's Records, Consultant's facilities and Consultant's current employees, deemed necessary by City or its designee(s), to perform such audit, inspection or examination. Consultant also agrees to provide adequate and appropriate work space necessary to City or its designees to conduct such audits, inspections or examinations. 9.4 Consultant shall include this audit clause in any subcontractor, supplier or vendor contract. ARTICLE X — OWNER REMEDIES 10.1 The City and Consultant agree that in the event the City suffers actual damages, the City may elect to pursue its actual damages and any other remedy allowed by law. This includes but is not limited to: 10.1.1 Failure of the Consultant to make adequate progress and endanger timely and successful completion of the Project, which includes failure of subconsultants to meet contractual obligations; 10.1.2 Failure of the Consultant to design in compliance with the laws of the City, State and/or federal governments, such that subsequent compliance costs exceed expenditures that would have been involved had services been properly executed by the Consultant. 10.1.3 Losses are incurred because of errors and/or omissions in the design, working drawings, specifications or other documents prepared by the Consultant to the extent that the financial losses are greater than the City would have originally paid had there not been errors and/or omissions in the documents. 10.2 The City may assert a claim against the Consultant's professional liability insurance as appropriate when other remedies are not available or offered for design deficiencies discovered during and after Project construction. 10.3 When the City incurs non -value added work costs for change orders due to design errors and/or omissions, the City will send the Consultant a letter that includes: (1) Summary of facts with supporting documentation; (2) Instructions for Consultant to revise design documents, if appropriate, at Consultant's expense; (3) Calculation of non -value added work costs incurred by the City; and (4) Deadline for Consultant's response. 10.4 The Consultant may be required to revise bid documents and re -advertise the Project at the Consultant's sole cost if, in the City's judgment, the Consultant generates excessive addenda, either in terms of the nature of the Contract for Professional Services Page 7 of 11 revision or the actual number of changes due to the Consultant's errors or omissions. 10.5 The City may withhold or nullify the whole or part of any payment as detailed in Article III. ARTICLE XI — CONSULTANT REMEDIES 11.1 If Consultant is delayed due to uncontrollable circumstances, such as strikes, riots, acts of God, national emergency, acts of the public enemy, governmental restrictions, laws or regulations or any other causes beyond Consultant's and City's reasonable control, an extension of the Project schedule in an amount equal to the time lost due to such delay shall be Consultant's sole and exclusive remedy. The revised schedule should be approved in writing with a documented reason for granting the extension. 11.2 The City agrees that the Consultant is not responsible for damages arising from any cause beyond Consultant's reasonable control. 11.3 If Consultant requests a remedy for a condition not specified above, Consultant must file a Claim as provided in this Agreement. ARTICLE XII — CLAIMS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION 12.1 Filing of Claims 12.1.1 Claims arising from the circumstances identified in this Agreement or other occurrences or events, shall be made by Written Notice delivered by the party making the Claim to the other party within twenty-one (21) calendar days after the start of the occurrence or event giving rise to the Claim and stating the general nature of the Claim. 12.1.2 Every Claim of Consultant, whether for additional compensation, additional time or other relief, shall be signed and sworn to by a person authorized to bind the Consultant by his/her signature, verifying the truth and accuracy of the Claim. 12.1.3 The responsibility to substantiate a claim rests with the party making the Claim. 12.1.4 Within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notice and supporting documentation, City will meet to discuss the request, after which an offer of settlement or a notification of no settlement offer will be sent to Consultant. If Consultant is not satisfied with the proposal presented, Consultant will have thirty (30) calendar days in which to (i) submit additional supporting data requested by the City, (ii) modify the initial request for remedy or (iii) request Mediation. 12.1.5 Pending final resolution of a claim, except as otherwise agreed in writing, Consultant shall proceed diligently with performance of the Agreement, and City shall continue to make payments in accordance with this Agreement. 12.2 Mediation 12.2.1 All negotiations pursuant to this clause are confidential and shall be treated as compromise and settlement negotiations for purposes of applicable rules of evidence. 12.2.2 Before invoking mediation, the Parties agree that they shall first try to resolve any dispute arising out of or related to this Agreement through discussions directly between those senior management representatives within their respective organizations who have overall managerial responsibility for similar projects. This step shall be a condition precedent to the use of mediation. If the parties' senior Contract for Professional Services Page 8 of 11 management representatives cannot resolve the dispute within thirty (30) calendar days after a Party delivers a written notice of such dispute, then the Parties shall proceed with the mediation process contained herein. 12.2.3.1 In the event that City or Consultant shall contend that the other has committed a material breach of this Agreement, the Party alleging such breach shall, as a condition precedent to filing any lawsuit, request mediation of the dispute. 12.2.3.2 Request for mediation shall be in writing, and shall request that the mediation commence no less than thirty (30) or more than ninety (90) calendar days following the date of the request, except upon agreement of both parties. 12.2.3.3 In the event City and Consultant are unable to agree to a date for the mediation or to the identity of the mediator or mediators within thirty (30) calendar days of the request for mediation, all conditions precedent in this Article shall be deemed to have occurred. 12.2.3.4 The parties shall share the mediator's fee. Venue for mediation shall be Nueces County, Texas. Any agreement reached in mediation shall be enforceable as a settlement agreement in any court having jurisdiction thereof. No provision of this Agreement shall waive any immunity or defense. No provision of this Agreement is a consent to suit. 12.3 In calculating the amount of any Claim or any measure of damages for breach of contract, the following standards shall apply both to claims by Consultant and to claims by City: 12.3.1 In no event shall either Party be liable, whether in contract or tort or otherwise, to the other Party for loss of profits, delay damages or for any special incidental or consequential loss or damage of any nature arising at any time or from any cause whatsoever; 12.3.2 Damages are limited to extra costs specifically shown to have been directly caused by a proven wrong for which the other Party is claimed to be responsible. 12.4 In case of litigation between the parties, Consultant and City agree that neither party shall be responsible for payment of attorney's fees pursuant to any law or other provision for payment of attorneys' fees. Both Parties expressly waive any claim to attorney's fees should litigation result from any dispute between the parties to this Agreement. 12.5 No Waiver of Governmental Immunity. NOTHING IN THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO WAIVE CITY'S GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY FROM LAWSUIT, WHICH IMMUNITY IS EXPRESSLY RETAINED TO THE EXTENT IT IS NOT CLEARLY AND UNAMBIGUOUSLY WAIVED BY STATE LAW. ARTICLE XIII — MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 13.1 Assignability. Neither party will assign, transfer or delegate any of its obligations or duties under this Agreement contract to any other person and/or party without the prior written consent of the other party, except for routine duties delegated to personnel of the Consultant staff. This includes subcontracts entered into for services under this Agreement. If the Consultant is a partnership or joint venture, then in the event of the termination of the partnership or joint venture, this contract will inure to the individual benefit of such partner or partners as the City may designate. No part of the Consultant fee may be assigned in advance of receipt by the Consultant without written consent of the City. The City will not pay the fees of expert or technical assistance and consultants unless such employment, including the rate of compensation, has been approved in writing by the City. Contract for Professional Services Page 9 of 11 13.2 Ownership of Documents. Consultant agrees that upon payment, City shall exclusively own any and all information in whatsoever form and character produced and/or maintained in accordance with, pursuant to or as a result of this Agreement, including contract documents (plans and specifications), drawings and submittal data. Consultant may make a copy for its files. Any reuse by the City, without specific written verification or adaptation by Consultant, shall be a City's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to Consultant. The City agrees that any modification of the plans will be evidenced on the plans and be signed and sealed by a licensed professional prior to re -use of modified plans. 13.3 Standard of Care. Services provided by Consultant under this Agreement shall be performed with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by competent licensed professionals practicing in the same or similar locality and under the same or similar circumstances and professional license; and performed as expeditiously as is prudent considering the ordinary professional skill and care of a competent engineer or architect. 13.4 Licensing. Consultant shall be represented by personnel with appropriate licensure, registration and/or certification(s) at meetings of any official nature concerning the Project, including scope meetings, review meetings, pre-bid meetings and preconstruction meetings. 13.5 Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire and integrated Agreement between City and Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either oral or written. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both the City and Consultant. 13.6 Disclosure of Interest. Consultant agrees to comply with City of Corpus Christi Ordinance No. 17112 and complete the Disclosure of Interests form, attached as Exhibit D. 13.7 Certificate of Interested Parties. For contracts greater than $50,000, Consultant agrees to comply with Texas Government Code section 2252.908 and complete Form 1295 Certificate of Interested Parties as part of this agreement, attached as Exhibit E. Form 1295 requires disclosure of "interested parties" with respect to entities that enter contracts with cities that exceed $50,000. These interested parties include: (1) persons with a "controlling interest" in the entity, which includes: a. an ownership interest or participating interest in a business entity by virtue of units, percentage, shares, stock or otherwise that exceeds 10 percent; b. membership on the board of directors or other governing body of a business entity of which the board or other governing body is composed of not more than 10 members; or c. service as an officer of a business entity that has four or fewer officers, or service as one of the four officers most highly compensated by a business entity that has more than four officers; or (2) a person who actively participates in facilitating a contract or negotiating the terms of a contract with a governmental entity or state agency, including a broker, intermediary, adviser or attorney for the business entity. Form 1295 must be electronically filed with the Texas Ethics Commission at https://www.ethics.state.tx.us/whatsnew/elf_info_form1295.htm. The form must then be printed, signed, notarized and filed with the City. For more information, please review the Texas Ethics Commission Rules at https://www.ethics.state.tx.us/legal/ch46.html. 13.8 Conflict of Interest. Consultant agrees, in compliance with Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Government Code, to complete and file Form CIQ with the City Secretary's Office. For more information and to determine if you need to file a Form CIQ, please review the information on the City Secretary's website at http://www.cctexas.com/govern ment/city-secretary/conflict-disclosure/index. 13.9 Controlling Law. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Texas without regard to its conflicts of laws. Venue for legal proceedings lies exclusively in Nueces County, Texas. Cases must be filed and tried in Nueces County and cannot be removed from Nueces County. Contract for Professional Services Page 10 of 11 13.10 Severability. If, for any reason, any one or more Articles and/or paragraphs of this Agreement are held invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remaining Articles and/or paragraphs of this Agreement but shall be confined in its effect to the specific Article, sentences, clauses or parts of this Agreement held invalid or unenforceable, and the invalidity or unenforceability of any Article, sentence, clause or parts of this Agreement, in any one or more instance, shall not affect or prejudice in any way the validity of this Agreement in any other instance. 13.11 Conflict Resolution Between Documents. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges if anything contained in the Consultant -prepared Exhibit A, Consultant's Scope of Services, or contained in any other document prepared by Consultant and included herein, is in conflict with this Agreement, this Agreement shall take precedence and control to resolve said conflict. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI SCS ENGINEERS, INC. J.H. Edmonds, P. E. Date David Mezzacappa, P.E. Director of Engineering Services Vice President 1901 Central Drive, Suite 550 Bedford, Texas 76021-5872 (817) 571-2288 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Assistant City Attorney Date ATTEST City Secretary Date Project Name Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Gas Collection and Control System Project Number E16289 Accounting Unit 3368-033 Account 550950 Activity E6289 01 3368 EXP Account Category 50950 Date Contract for Professional Services Page 11 of 11 Solid Waste Management Consultants and Contractors 1901 Central Drive Suite 550 Bedford, Texas 76021- 5672 817 571-2288 FAX 817 571-2188 www.scsengineers.com SCS ENGINEERS December 6, 2016 SCS Proposal No. 160184216 Mr, Ivan Luna City of Corpus Christi 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi TX 78401 (sent via email) Subject: Cefe Valenzuela Landfill — Corpus Christi, TX Proposal for Gas Collection and Control System (GCCS) Construction -Phase Engineering and Quality Assurance (CQA) Services Dear Ivan: Per your request, SCS Engineers (SCS) is pleased to provide the City of Corpus Christi (City) with this proposal for construction -phase engineering and CQA services for the GCCS construction project proposed at the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill (landfill), located in Corpus Christi, Texas. Construction -phase engineering and CQA services are described in detail below, but generally include a pre -construction survey of proposed landfill gas (LFG) extraction wells; laboratory testing of select materials; review of submittals, requests -for -information, laboratory test results, and pay applications; observation/documentation of drilling of landfill gas (LFG) extraction wells and installation of various materials, equipment, and concrete foundations; and preparation of a construction documentation report. As you know, based on our permitting and design experience for the Cefe Valenzuela and J.C. Elliot Landfills and CQA experience for GCCS construction for numerous landfills across the United States, including Texas, New Mexico, Louisiana, and Oklahoma, we are very qualified to perform the CQA services for this project. In particular our preparation of the GCCS Design Plan for the landfill and preparation of the construction plans, specifications, and bid documents for this GCCS construction project, will position our team for cost-effective performance of the CQA for this project. Based on the Contract Documents, entitled "Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Gas Collection and Control System (GCCS), Project Number E16289 (prepared by SCS, dated November 1, 2016), for the GCCS construction project, construction of the GCCS may take up to 203 calendar days for substantial completion and an allotment of 30 additional calendar days for final completion (although our fee estimate assumes 203 days for substantial completion and 14 days for final completion, based on our experience with this type of work). Therefore, our proposed fee estimate assumes construction will be performed over no more than ten (10) hours per day, Monday through Saturday (working day) for a up to 184 working days. As such, our proposal has been separated into the following tasks; • Task 1 — LFG Extraction Well Pre -Construction Survey; W\W\\Carpi 041a1\I 601 412 C4 GM LOW 12Oil bCal• GCC9 CG 9r+ga>-tlx Offices Nationwide Exhibit A Page 1 of 6 Mr. Ivan Luna December 6, 2016 Page 2 • Task 2 — Laboratory Services; • Task 3 — Engineer and Field CQA Services; and • Task 4 — Construction Documentation Report. Our proposed project team has significant experience m GCCS design; construction; operations and maintenance; and CQA. Our CQA team will be supervised by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Texas who will certify that the installation of the GCCS has been performed in accordance with the Contract Documents and nationally recognized industry standards. As indicated below, the Certifying Engineer on this project will be Ryan Kuntz, P.E., who was also the Design Engineer for development of the Contract Document, and has intimate knowledge of the project and design specifics. Our proposed CQA team will be comprised of the following personnel: Professional Land Surveyor: Soils Laboratory: Concrete Laboratory: Certifying Engineer: CQA Technician(s): SAM, Inc TEAM Consultants, Inc. Rock Engineering and Testing Laboratories Ryan Kuntz, P.E., SCS Engineers TBD, SCS Engineers Although not attached, our CQA team resumes can be made available upon request. SCOPE OF WORK The proposed scope of work is divided into four tasks. Based on our understanding of the project objectives, our proposed scope of services is detailed below. Task 1 — LFG Extraction Well Pre -Construction Survey SCS will provide a pre -construction survey of the proposed LFG extraction well locations. The pre -construction survey will be performed by a Professional Land Surveyor registered in the State of Texas subcontracted by SCS, to confirm ground surface elevations of the landfill gas (LFG) extraction wells. This survey will be performed one (1) week prior to construction or sooner if necessary to accommodate commencement of the drilling effort. The surface elevations obtained for the well locations will be used to finalize the well schedule for the project. This pre -construction survey will be reviewed and approved by the Certifying Engineer who is a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Texas. Task 2 - Laboratory Testing This task includes the performance and review of laboratory testing required during the project. Laboratory testing will be performed for material and properties required by the technical specifications for the project. WVraeaa.\ n. o.,&I ami 642,e nw CCc Ca.V s 20e!PCN. GCCS C .Smavd< Offices Nationwide Exhibit A Page 2of6 Mr. Ivan Luna December 6, 2016 Page 3 Consistent with the technical specifications, the following materials will require laboratory testing for verification of conformance with the technical specifications: • Well Aggregate (gradation and calcium carbonate content); • Base Aggregate, facility working surface aggregate (Atterberg limits, modified Proctor, soundness, abrasion, and gradation); • Coarse Aggregate, beneath concrete foundations (soundness and gradation); • Structural Fill (standard Proctor, gradation, and Atterberg Limits); • Cement Stabilized Sand Fill (gradation, Atterberg Limits, standard Proctor); and • Concrete (Compressive Strength). Additionally, this task includes the necessary field testing for verification of compaction requirements for the structural fill that will be placed for construction of the blower/flare facility soil pad and various materials for the road crossings of the main perimeter haul road. As such, SCS will subcontract a geotechnical consultant or perform using in-house technicians to perform in-place field density testing using a nuclear density gauge. Our fee estimate for this task assumes that soil at the blower/flare facility will placed within 3 days, and as such will require no more than three (3) trips for this testing. Additionally, our fee estimate for the road crossings assumes that no more than six (6) trips for testing will be necessary. Lastly, this task includes the necessary field testing of concrete for air content, water content, and slump and collection of concrete cylinders (7 -day, 28 -day, and archive cylinders) for compressive strength testing. Task 3 — Engineer and Field CQA Services This task includes Engineer and Field CQA services during the project. During construction, SCS will provide a qualified CQA technician to be onsite daily to observe and document construction, and to verify conformance with the construction plans and specifications. The CQA technician's responsibilities during drilling and completion of extraction wells will include the following: 1. Document and observe well construction for conformance to the approved construction plans and specifications. 2. Document and observe the waste composition, temperature, and decomposition level of waste removed from the wellbore. This information will be documented on well boring logs. 3. Document and observe that proper well depths, pipe types, backfill, backfill procedures, and well pipe lengths are consistent with the construction plans and specifications. This information will be documented on well installation records. a.rcn\foo�216.21e C.1. ctn ca0VI2O6. C.l._GC. cc. f...�o.d.. Offices Nationwide Exhibit A Page 3 of 6 Mr. Ivan Luna December 6, 2016 Page 4 4. SCS' CQA technician will have the capability to confirm well locations and elevations using GPS survey equipment, and re -stake wells if necessary due to any field adjustments made during construction. The CQA technician's responsibilities during the remainder of the project will include the documentation and observation of the following for conformance with the construction plans and specifications: 1. Materials, layout and installation of pipe, fittings, and valves associated with air supply, condensate forcemain, and header and lateral piping. 2. Soils, aggregate, cement stabilized sand, and road materials, placement, compaction, and grading for construction of blower/flare facility and road crossings. 3. Materials, layout and installation of concrete foundations. 4. Review, observe, and document pneumatic pipe pressure testing. 5. Equipment (blower, flare, and compressor) installation and connections, including electrical, propane ignition system, air supply lines, and condensate drains. The CQA technician will provide daily record location and elevation surveys of installed components and verify proper slopes and depths of piping prior to burial, as necessary, consistent with the construction plans and specifications. This work will be completed with GPS survey equipment. The survey equipment and CQA Technician will be capable of inversing slopes in the field to provide immediate verification of slopes to the Contractor. The survey equipment will be available for use on-site during all times that construction activities are ongoing. If field conditions require an adjustment to the well locations, piping or other materials/equipment, the Certifying Engineer will confirm what adjustments are needed, and coordinate accordingly with City, Contractor, and CQA Technicians. During construction, the Certifying Engineer or qualified representative will review and approve collected survey data on a weekly basis. Additionally, during construction the CQA Technician will prepare daily activity reports documenting conformance with the construction plans and specifications, which will be incorporated into the construction documentation report (Task 4). As described above, our fee estimate for Task 3 assumes a construction schedule of up to 184 working days for construction, performed over 10 hours per day, Monday through Saturday. Also, our fees for this task include applicable expenses for our CQA technicians, such as mobilization/demobilization, lodging/per diem, vehicle/mileage, and equipment (survey equipment). If the Contractor experiences any downtime in excess of three working days, additional mobilization/ demobilization charges may be necessary. Also, this task includes the supervision, project management, and construction -phase engineering services by the Certifying Engineer. This individual will make visits to the site to be familiar with the work and to review the gathered documentation of construction. The Certifying \wv,e,..d.\Conan \160.64216 b.. OC 3 CLAW:061644 G03 LOA .ax Offices Nationwide Exhibit A Page4of6 Mr. Ivan Luna December 6, 2016 Page 5 Engineer or qualified representative thereof will perform the construction -phase engineering services, which will include the following services: • Telephone calls among the City, Contractor, and/or CQA technician to answer questions and resolve issues. • Review and respond to all Contractor submittals and requests -for -information or clarifications. • Coordinate interpretations of construction plans and specifications. • Preparation of well boring logs and well completion records based on documented installation of LFG extraction wells. • Maintain files for correspondence, photographs, requests -for -information or clarifications, submittal responses, and other construction project related documentation. • Review and evaluate Contractor change order proposals (if any), pay applications, and final verification for measurement and payment. Our fee estimate for this task assumes that up to 6 hours/week for the Certifying Engineer or qualified representative thereof will be sufficient over the assumed project duration to complete the construction -phase engineering services. In addition to the above construction -phase engineering services, the Certifying Engineer or qualified representative will participate in bi-weekly project meetings by conference call, and attend up to eight (8) onsite inspections/meetings during the project, including a pre - construction meeting, ten (6) intermediate meetings/inspections; and a final inspection/walkthrough at substantial completion. Task 4 — Construction Documentation Report This task will include the preparation of a construction documentation report at the project. This report will include record drawings and surveys, including surveying of extraction wells, piping at 50 -foot intervals or less for pipe inflections, fittings, and valves, concrete foundations, and other infrastructure installed during the course of the project. The construction report will include a project overview, record survey, results of lab and field testing, LFG extraction well boring logs and installation records, daily reports, and photographs taken during construction. The narrative portion of the report will list project participants, construction milestone dates, and provide a description of issues encountered during construction or areas that may warrant attention in the future. A draft (electronic PDF format) of the construction report will be emailed to City within three (3) weeks of field work completion for review. Up to three (3) final hard copies for the site's records and electronic PDF will be submitted within two (2) weeks after receiving comments. The final report will have any edits per comments from City addressed, and will be sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Texas. W\5flV pnelACerp. 0.101\E CD E 842 I n WE OCCS COA Vl2O010C.f. OCCS GOA S.r.ue..da Offices Nationwide Exhibit A Page 5 of 6 Mr. Ivan Luna December 6, 2016 Page 6 FEE AND SCHEDULE In view of the well-defined nature of Tasks 1 and 4, SCS proposes to perform the services for Tasks 1 and 4 on a fixed fee (lump sum) basis. In order to remain flexible to adapt to field conditions and uncertainties associated with construction, SCS proposes to perform the services for Tasks 2 and 3 and on a time -and -materials basis. SCS' proposed fees for this project are shown in the following table. Task ID Task Description Proposed Fee 1 LFG Extraction Well Pre -Construction Survey $4,500 2 Laboratory Testing $12,000 3 Engineer and Field CQA Services $245,500 4 Construction Documentation Report $6,000 Total $268,000 Time -and -material fees for Tasks 2 and 3 will be billed consistent with the attached fee schedule. It is recognized that the above tasks fees are estimates and may be adjusted during the performance of the project, but the overall project budget will not be exceeded without prior approval of the City. Regarding the project schedule, SCS is ready to proceed upon approval and can meet the staffing and scheduling requirements as needed to accommodate this project. CLOSING SCS appreciates the opportunity to provide this proposal for CQA services to the City. Please contact Ryan Kuntz, P.E. at (817) 358-6117 if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, Ryan Kuntz, P.E. Project Director SCS ENGINEERS MVO \ Pre pud.\Cerp. Or. \160164216 COI C.CCS CQ.\P1206I,C ,. fCCS baa Sen....dee 420;,1 David Mezzacappa, P.E. Vice President SCS ENGINEERS Offices Nationwiclr: Exhibit A Page6of6 X LUX Z X I- H. O ✓ O Z W Z as O m 5 �>> a E = a Invoice Date: CD t.) CD a E 0 0 w co V c '0 N d 0 O . •5 0 a) c> 0 — c 72) O• • E >> Q E O o 0 N Z Q z E 0 0 Basic Services: \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ \ 0 0 O O \ 0 O 0'9 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O 0'9 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O \ 0 O O O O O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Preliminary Phase Design Phase co co L OQ CD LT) Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Additional Services: Warranty Phase 0 & M Manuals O 0 Subtotal Additional Services Basic Services Fees Additional Services Fees Total of Fees Exhibit "B" Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT B-1 CONFIDENTIAL RATE SHEET Rate sheets are confidential pursuant to section 552.104 of the Texas Government Code since release of this information would give advantage to a competitor or bidder. In addition, section 552.110 of the TX Govt. Code protects third party commercial and financial information if release of the information would cause the third party substantial competitive harm. Final determination of confidentiality will be made by the Texas Attorney General. DOCUMENTATION OF PROVISIONAL / OVERHEAD RATES: Overhead rate documentation has been provided to the City of Corpus Christi and was utilized in reviewing and approving the loaded hourly rates below. PRINCIPALS: The Consultant must provide documentation with each payment request that clearly indicates how a Principal's time is allocated and the justification for that allocation. PRINCIPAL(S): HOURLY RATE ($/h r) TX REGISTRATION #: Project Consultant: CAD Technician: Clerical: Other — specify: SUBCONSULTANT(S): (firm) Principal(s): Project Consultant: CAD Technician: Clerical Other — specify: Add additional subconsultants as needed. Exhibit B-1 Confidential Rate Sheet Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT C Insurance Requirements 1.1 Consultant must not commence work under this agreement until all required insurance has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Consultant must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. 1.2 Consultant must furnish to the Director of Engineering Services with the signed agreement a copy of Certificates of Insurance (001) with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies, and a waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with COI. Project name and or number must be listed in Description Box of COI. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -written day notice of cancellation, required on all certificates or by applicable policy endorsements Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate Commercial General Liability including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises — Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non -Owned 3. Rented/Leased $500,000 Combined Single Limit PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY (Errors and Omissions) $1,000,000 Per Claim If claims made policy, retro date must be prior to inception of agreement, have extended reporting period provisions and identify any limitations regarding who is insured. 1 Rev 07/16 Exhibit C Page 1 of 3 1.3 In the event of accidents of any kind related to this agreement, Consultant must furnish the City with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. 1.4 Consultant shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Consultant's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. Consultant is required to provide City with renewal Certificates. 1.5 Consultant shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Consultant shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Engineering Services P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 1.6 Consultant agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: 1.6.1 List the City and its officers, officials, employees and elected representatives as additional insured by endorsement, as respects operations, completed operation and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured performed under contract with the City with the exception of the professional liability/Errors & Omissions policy; 1.6.2 Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; 1.6.3 Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation or non -renewal of coverage, and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. 1.7 Within five (5) calendar days of a suspension, cancellation or non -renewal of coverage, Consultant shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Consultant's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 1.8 In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Consultant's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Consultant to remove the exhibit 2 Rev 07/16 Exhibit C Page 2 of 3 hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) if any, which become due to Consultant hereunder until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. 1.9 Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Consultant's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this agreement. 1.10 It is agreed that Consultant's insurance shall be deemed primary and non- contributory with respect to any insurance or self-insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this agreement. 1.11 It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. 3 Rev 07/16 Exhibit C Page 3 of 3 SUPPLIER NUMBER TO BE ASSIGNED BY CITY- PURCHASING DIVISION rr►,r� City of CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Corpus DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Christi City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and defmitions. COMPANY NAME: P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 4. Association CITY: ZIP: 2. Partnership 5. Other 3. Sole Owner ❑ DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each ` employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Job Title and City Department (if known) N/A 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name N/A Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Board, Commission or Committee N/A 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Consultant N/A EXHIBIT "D" Page 1 of 2 FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Title: (Type or Print) Signature of Certifying Date: Person: DEFINITIONS a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part- time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." g - "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. EXHIBIT "D" Page 2 of 2 Excerpt from FORM 00 72 00 GENERAL CONDITIONS for Construction Projects related to design services Table of Contents Page Article 1 — Definitions and Terminology 2 Article 2 — Preliminary Matters 8 Article 3 — Contract Documents: Intent, Requirements, Reuse 8 Article 4 — Commencement and Progress of the Work 9 Article 5 —Availability of Lands; Subsurface and Physical Conditions; Hazardous Environmental Conditions 9 Article 6 — Bonds and Insurance 11 Article 7 — Contractor's Responsibilities 11 Article 8 — Other Work at the Site 11 Article 9 — Owner's and OPT's Responsibilities 11 Article 10 — OAR's and Designer's Status During Construction 12 Article 11— Amending the Contract Documents; Changes in the Work 14 Article 12 — Claims 14 Article 13 — Cost of the Work; Allowances; Unit Price Work 14 Article 14 — Tests and Inspections; Correction, Removal, or Acceptance of Defective Work 14 Article 15 — Payments to Contractor; Set -Offs; Completion; Correction Period 14 Article 16 — Suspension of Work and Termination 14 Article 17 — Final Resolution of Disputes 14 Article 18 — Miscellaneous 14 Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions - 1 Exhibit F Page 1 of 14 ARTICLE 1— DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY 1.01 Defined Terms A. A term with initial capital letters, including the term's singular and plural forms, has the meaning indicated in this paragraph wherever used in the Bidding Requirements or Contract Documents. In addition to the terms specifically defined, terms with initial capital letters in the Contract Documents may include references to identified articles and paragraphs, and the titles of other documents or forms. 1. Addenda - Documents issued prior to the receipt of Bids which clarify or modify the Bidding Requirements or the proposed Contract Documents. 2. Agreement - The document executed between Owner and Contractor covering the Work. 3. Alternative Dispute Resolution - The process by which a disputed Claim may be settled as an alternative to litigation, if Owner and Contractor cannot reach an agreement between themselves. 4. Application for Payment - The forms used by Contractor to request payments from Owner and the supporting documentation required by the Contract Documents. 5. Award Date — The date the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi (City) authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute the Contract on behalf of the City. 6. Bid - The documents submitted by a Bidder to establish the proposed Contract Price and Contract Times and provide other information and certifications as required by the Bidding Requirements. 7. Bidding Documents - The Bidding Requirements, the proposed Contract Documents, and Addenda. 8. Bidder - An individual or entity that submits a Bid to Owner. 9. Bidding Requirements - The Invitation for Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Bid Security, Bid Form and attachments, and required certifications. 10. Bid Security - The financial security in the form of a bid bond provided by Bidder at the time the Bid is submitted and held by Owner until the Agreement is executed and the evidence of insurance and Bonds required by the Contract Documents are provided. A cashier's check, certified check, money order or bank draft from any State or National Bank will also be acceptable. 11. Bonds - Performance Bond, Payment Bond, Maintenance Bond, and other Surety instruments executed by Surety. When in singular form, refers to individual instrument. 12. Change Order - A document issued on or after the Effective Date of the Contract and signed by Owner and Contractor which modifies the Work, Contract Price, Contract Times, or terms and conditions of the Contract. Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions - 2 Exhibit F Page 2 of 14 13. Change Proposal - A document submitted by Contractor in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents: a. Requesting an adjustment in Contract Price or Contract Times; b. Contesting an initial decision concerning the requirements of the Contract Documents or the acceptability of Work under the Contract Documents; c. Challenging a set-off against payment due; or d. Seeking a Modification with respect to the terms of the Contract. 14. City Engineer - The Corpus Christi City Engineer and/or his designated representative as identified at the preconstruction conference or in the Notice to Proceed. 15. Claim - A demand or assertion by Owner or Contractor submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. A demand for money or services by an entity other than the Owner or Contractor is not a Claim. 16. Constituent of Concern - Asbestos, petroleum, radioactive materials, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), hazardous wastes, and substances, products, wastes, or other materials that are or become listed, regulated, or addressed pursuant to: a. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §§9601 et seq. ("CERCLA"); b. The Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. §§5501 et seq.; c. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §§6901 et seq. ("RCRA"); d. The Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. §§2601 et seq.; e. The Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§1251 et seq.; f. The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§7401 et seq.; or g. Any other Laws or Regulations regulating, relating to, or imposing liability or standards of conduct concerning hazardous, toxic, or dangerous waste, substance, or material. 17. Contract - The entire integrated set of documents concerning the Work and describing the relationship between the Owner and Contractor. 18. Contract Amendment - A document issued on or after the Effective Date of the Contract and signed by Owner and Contractor which: a. Authorizes new phases of the Work and establishes the Contract Price, Contract Times, or terms and conditions of the Contract for the new phase of Work; or b. Modifies the terms and conditions of the Contract, but does not make changes in the Work. 19. Contract Documents - Those items designated as Contract Documents in the Agreement. 20. Contract Price - The monetary amount stated in the Agreement and as adjusted by Modifications, and increases or decreases in unit price quantities, if any, that Owner has agreed to pay Contractor for completion of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions - 3 Exhibit F Page 3 of 14 21. Contract Times - The number of days or the dates by which Contractor must: a. Achieve specified Milestones; b. Achieve Substantial Completion; and c. Complete the Work. 22. Contractor - The individual or entity with which Owner has contracted for performance of the Work. 23. Contractor's Team - Contractor and Subcontractors, Suppliers, individuals, or entities directly or indirectly employed or retained by them to perform part of the Work or anyone for whose acts they may be liable. 24. Cost of the Work - The sum of costs incurred for the proper performance of the Work as allowed by Article 13. 25. Defective - When applied to Work, refers to Work that is unsatisfactory, faulty, or deficient in that it: a. Does not conform to the Contract Documents; b. Does not meet the requirements of applicable inspections, reference standards, tests, or approvals referred to in the Contract Documents; or c. Has been damaged or stolen prior to OAR's recommendation of final payment unless responsibility for the protection of the Work has been assumed by Owner at Substantial Completion in accordance with Paragraphs 15.03 or 15.04. 26. Designer - The individuals or entity named as Designer in the Agreement and the subconsultants, individuals, or entities directly or indirectly employed or retained by Designer to provide design or other technical services to the Owner. Designer has responsibility for engineering or architectural design and technical issues related to the Contract Documents. Designers are Licensed Professional Engineers or Registered Architects qualified to practice their profession in the State of Texas. 27. Drawings - The part of the Contract that graphically shows the scope, extent, and character of the Work. Shop Drawings and other Contractor documents are not Drawings. 28. Effective Date of the Contract - The date indicated in the Agreement on which the City Manager or designee has signed the Contract. 29. Field Order - A document issued by OAR or Designer requiring changes in the Work that do not change the Contract Price or the Contract Times. 30. Hazardous Environmental Condition - The presence of Constituents of Concern at the Site in quantities or circumstances that may present a danger to persons or property exposed to Constituents of Concern. The presence of Constituents of Concern at the Site necessary for the execution of the Work or to be incorporated in the Work is not a Hazardous Environmental Condition provided these Constituents of Concern are controlled and contained pursuant to industry practices, Laws and Regulations, and the requirements of the Contract. Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions - 4 Exhibit F Page 4 of 14 31. Indemnified Costs - All costs, losses, damages, and legal or other dispute resolution costs resulting from claims or demands against Owner's Indemnitees. These costs include fees for engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals. 32. Laws and Regulations; Laws or Regulations - Applicable laws, statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes, and orders of governmental bodies, agencies, authorities, and courts having jurisdiction over the Project. 33. Liens - Charges, security interests, or encumbrances upon Contract related funds, real property, or personal property. 34. Milestone - A principal event in the performance of the Work that Contractor is required by Contract to complete by a specified date or within a specified period of time. 35. Modification - Change made to the Contract Documents by one of the following methods: a. Contract Amendment; b. Change Order; c. Field Order; or d. Work Change Directive. 36. Notice of Award - The notice of Owner's intent to enter into a contract with the Selected Bidder. 37. Notice to Proceed - A notice to Contractor of the Contract Times and the date Work is to begin. 38. Owner - The City of Corpus Christi (City), a Texas home -rule municipal corporation and political subdivision organized under the laws of the State of Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized City Manager and his designee, the City Engineer (the Director of Engineering Services), and the City's officers, employees, agents, or representatives, authorized to administer design and construction of the Project. 39. Owner's Authorized Representative or OAR - The individual or entity named as OAR in the Agreement and the consultants, subconsultants, individuals, or entities directly or indirectly employed or retained by them to provide construction management services to the Owner. The OAR may be an employee of the Owner. 40. Owner's Indemnitees - Each member of the OPT and their officers, directors, members, partners, employees, agents, consultants, and subcontractors. 41. Owner's Project Team or OPT - The Owner, Owner's Authorized Representative, Resident Project Representative, Designer, and the consultants, subconsultants, individuals, or entities directly or indirectly employed or retained by them to provide services to the Owner. 42. Partial Occupancy or Use - Use by Owner of a substantially completed part of the Work for the purpose for which it is intended (or a related purpose) prior to Substantial Completion of all the Work. Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions - 5 Exhibit F Page 5 of 14 43. Progress Schedule - A schedule prepared and maintained by Contractor, describing the sequence and duration of the activities comprising the Contractor's plan to accomplish the Work within the Contract Times. 44. Project - The total undertaking to be accomplished for Owner under the Contract Documents. 45. Resident Project Representative or RPR - The authorized representative of OPT assigned to assist OAR at the Site. As used herein, the term Resident Project Representative includes assistants and field staff of the OAR. 46. Samples - Physical examples of materials, equipment, or workmanship representing some portion of the Work that are used to establish the standards for that portion of the Work. 47. Schedule of Documents - A schedule of required documents, prepared, and maintained by Contractor. 48. Schedule of Values - A schedule, prepared and maintained by Contractor, allocating portions of the Contract Price to various portions of the Work and used as the basis for Contractor's Applications for Payment. 49. Selected Bidder - The Bidder to which Owner intends to award the Contract. 50. Shop Drawings - All drawings, diagrams, illustrations, schedules, and other data or information that are specifically prepared or assembled and submitted by Contractor to illustrate some portion of the Work. Shop Drawings, whether approved or not, are not Drawings and are not Contract Documents. 51. Site - Lands or areas indicated in the Contract Documents as being furnished by Owner upon which the Work is to be performed. The Site includes rights-of-way, easements, and other lands furnished by Owner which are designated for use by the Contractor. 52. Specifications - The part of the Contract that describes the requirements for materials, equipment, systems, standards, and workmanship as applied to the Work, and certain administrative requirements and procedural matters applicable to the Work. 53. Subcontractor - An individual or entity having a direct contract with Contractor or with other Subcontractors or Suppliers for the performance of a part of the Work. 54. Substantial Completion - The point where the Work or a specified part of the Work is sufficiently complete to be used for its intended purpose in accordance with the Contract Documents. 55. Supplementary Conditions - The part of the Contract that amends or supplements the General Conditions. 56. Supplier - A manufacturer, fabricator, supplier, distributor, materialman, or vendor having a direct contract with Contractor or with Subcontractors or other Suppliers to furnish materials or equipment to be incorporated in the Work. 57. Technical Data - Those items expressly identified as Technical Data in the Supplementary Conditions with respect to either: a. Subsurface conditions at the Site; Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions - 6 Exhibit F Page 6 of 14 b. Physical conditions relating to existing surface or subsurface structures at the Site, except Underground Facilities; or c. Hazardous Environmental Conditions at the Site. 58. Underground Facilities - All underground pipelines, conduits, ducts, cables, wires, manholes, vaults, tanks, tunnels, other similar facilities or appurtenances, and encasements containing these facilities which are used to convey electricity, gases, steam, liquid petroleum products, telephone or other communications, fiber optic transmissions, cable television, water, wastewater, storm water, other liquids or chemicals, or traffic or other control systems. 59. Unit Price Work - Work to be paid for on the basis of unit prices. 60. Work - The construction of the Project or its component parts as required by the Contract Documents. 61. Work Change Directive - A directive issued to Contractor on or after the Effective Date of the Contract ordering an addition, deletion, or revision in the Work. The Work Change Directive serves as a memorandum of understanding regarding the directive until a Change Order can be issued. 1.02 Terminology A. The words and terms discussed in this Paragraph 1.02 are not defined, but when used in the Bidding Requirements or Contract Documents, have the indicated meaning. B. It is understood that the cost for performing Work is included in the Contract Price and no additional compensation is to be paid by Owner unless specifically stated otherwise in the Contract Documents. Expressions including or similar to "at no additional cost to Owner," "at Contractor's expense," or similar words mean that the Contractor is to perform or provide specified operation of Work without an increase in the Contract Price. C. The terms "day" or "calendar day" mean a calendar day of 24 hours measured from midnight to the next midnight. D. The meaning and intent of certain terms or adjectives are described as follows: 1. The terms "as allowed," "as approved," "as ordered," "as directed," or similar terms in the Contract Documents indicate an exercise of professional judgment by the OPT. 2. Adjectives including or similar to "reasonable," "suitable," "acceptable," "proper," "satisfactory," or similar adjectives are used to describe a determination of OPT regarding the Work. 3. Any exercise of professional judgment by the OPT will be made solely to evaluate the Work for general compliance with the Contract Documents unless there is a specific statement in the Contract Documents indicating otherwise. 4. The use of these or similar terms or adjectives does not assign a duty or give OPT authority to supervise or direct the performance of the Work, or assign a duty or give authority to the OPT to undertake responsibilities contrary to the provisions of Articles 9 or 10 or other provisions of the Contract Documents. Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions - 7 Exhibit F Page 7 of 14 E. The use of the words "furnish," "install," "perform," and "provide" have the following meanings when used in connection with services, materials, or equipment: 1. Furnish means to supply and deliver the specified services, materials, or equipment to the Site or other specified location ready for use or installation. 2. Install means to complete construction or assembly of the specified services, materials, or equipment so they are ready for their intended use. 3. Perform or provide means to furnish and install specified services, materials, or equipment, complete and ready for their intended use. 4. Perform or provide the specified services, materials, or equipment complete and ready for intended use if the Contract Documents require specific services, materials, or equipment, but do not expressly use the words "furnish," "install," "perform," or "provide." F. Contract Documents are written in modified brief style: 1. Requirements apply to all Work of the same kind, class, and type even though the word "all" is not stated. 2. Simple imperative sentence structure is used which places a verb as the first word in the sentence. It is understood that the words "furnish," "install," "perform," "provide," or similar words include the meaning of the phrase "The Contractor shall..." before these words. 3. Unless specifically stated that action is to be taken by the OPT or others, it is understood that the action described is a requirement of the Contractor. G. Words or phrases that have a well-known technical or construction industry or trade meaning are used in the Contract Documents in accordance with this recognized meaning unless stated otherwise in the Contract Documents. H. Written documents are required where reference is made to notices, reports, approvals, consents, documents, statements, instructions, opinions or other types of communications required by the Contract Documents. Approval and consent documents must be received by Contractor prior to the action or decision for which approval or consent is given. These may be made in printed or electronic format through the OPT's project management information system or other electronic media as required by the Contract Documents or approved by the OAR. I. Giving notice as required by the Contract Documents may be by printed or electronic media using a method that requires acknowledgment of the receipt of that notice. ARTICLE 2 — PRELIMINARY MATTERS ARTICLE 3 — CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: INTENT, REQUIREMENTS, REUSE 3.01 Intent B. Provide equipment that is functionally complete as described in the Contract Documents. The Drawings and Specifications do not indicate or describe all of the Work required to complete the installation of products purchased by the Owner or Contractor. Additional Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions - 8 Exhibit F Page 8 of 14 details required for the correct installation of selected products are to be provided by the Contractor and coordinated with the Designer through the OAR. 3.02 Reference Standards B. Comply with applicable construction industry standards, whether referenced or not. 1. Standards referenced in the Contract Documents govern over standards not referenced but recognized as applicable in the construction industry. 2. Comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents if they produce a higher quality of Work than the applicable construction industry standards. 3. Designer determines whether a code or standard is applicable, which of several are applicable, or if the Contract Documents produce a higher quality of Work. 3.03 Reporting and Resolving Discrepancies 3.04 Interpretation of the Contract Documents A. Submit questions concerning the non-technical or contractual / administrative requirements of the Contract Documents to the OAR immediately after those questions arise. OAR is to provide an interpretation of the Contract Documents regarding these questions and will coordinate the response of the OPT to Contractor. B. Submit questions regarding the design of the Project described in the Contract Documents to the OAR immediately after those questions arise. OAR is to request an interpretation of the Contract Documents from the Designer. Designer is to respond to these questions by providing an interpretation of the Contract Documents. OAR will coordinate the response of the OPT to Contractor. C. OPT may initiate a Modification to the Contract Documents through the OAR if a response to the question indicates that a change in the Contract Documents is required. Contractor may appeal Designer's or OAR's interpretation by submitting a Change Proposal. ARTICLE 4 — COMMENCEMENT AND PROGRESS OF THE WORK ARTICLE 5 —AVAILABILITY OF LANDS; SUBSURFACE AND PHYSICAL CONDITIONS; HAZARDOUS ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 5.01 Availability of Lands 5.02 Use of Site and Other Areas 5.03 Subsurface and Physical Conditions 5.04 Differing Subsurface or Physical Conditions A. Notify OAR immediately, but in no event later than 3 days, after becoming aware of a subsurface or physical condition that is uncovered or revealed at the Site, and before Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions - 9 Exhibit F Page 9 of 14 further disturbing the subsurface or physical conditions or performing any related Work that: 1. Establishes that the Technical Data on which Contractor is entitled to rely as provided in Paragraph 5.03 is materially inaccurate; 2. Requires a change in the Drawings or Specifications; 3. Differs materially from that shown or indicated in the Contract Documents; or 4. Is of an unusual nature and differs materially from conditions ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in the Contract Documents. Do not further disturb or perform Work related to this subsurface or physical condition, except in an emergency as required by Paragraph 7.12, until permission to do so is issued by OAR. B. OAR is to notify the OPT after receiving notice of a differing subsurface or physical condition from the Contractor. Designer is to: 1. Promptly review the subsurface or physical condition; 2. Determine the necessity of OPT's obtaining additional exploration or tests with respect the subsurface or physical condition; 3. Determine if the subsurface or physical condition falls within one or more of the differing Site condition categories in Paragraph 5.04.A; 4. Prepare recommendations to OPT regarding the Contractor's resumption of Work in connection with the subsurface or physical condition in question; 5. Determine the need for changes in the Drawings or Specifications; and 6. Advise OPT of Designer's findings, conclusions, and recommendations. C. OAR is to issue a statement to Contractor regarding the subsurface or physical condition in question and recommend action as appropriate after review of Designer's findings, conclusions, and recommendations. 5.05 Underground Facilities A. The information and data shown or indicated in the Contract Documents with respect to existing Underground Facilities at or adjacent to the Site is based on information and data furnished to OPT by the owners of these Underground Facilities or by others. OPT is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of information or data provided by others that OPT makes available to Contractor. The Contractor is responsible for: 1. Reviewing and checking available information and data regarding existing Underground Facilities at the Site; 2. Complying with Laws and Regulations related to locating Underground Facilities before beginning Work; 3. Locating Underground Facilities shown or indicated in the Contract Documents; 4. Coordinating the Work with the owners, including Owner, of Underground Facilities during construction; and Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions - 10 Exhibit F Page 10 of 14 5. The safety and protection of existing Underground Facilities at or adjacent to the Site and repairing damage resulting from the Work. B. Notify the OAR and the owner of the Underground Facility immediately if an Underground Facility is uncovered or revealed at the Site that was not shown in the Contract Documents, or was not shown with reasonable accuracy in the Contract Documents. Do not further disturb conditions or perform Work affected by this discovery, except in the event of an emergency as required by Paragraph 7.12. C. The Designer is to take the following action after receiving notice from the OAR: 1. Promptly review the Underground Facility and conclude whether the Underground Facility was not shown or indicated in the Contract Documents, or was not shown or indicated with reasonable accuracy; 2. Prepare recommendations to OPT regarding the Contractor's resumption of Work in connection with this Underground Facility; 3. Determine the extent to which a change is required in the Drawings or Specifications to document the consequences of the existence or location of the Underground Facility; and 4. Advise OAR of Designer's findings, conclusions, and recommendations and provide revised Drawings and Specifications if required. D. OAR is to issue a statement to Contractor regarding the Underground Facility in question and recommend action as appropriate after review of Designer's findings, conclusions, and recommendations. ARTICLE 6 — BONDS AND INSURANCE ARTICLE 7 — CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITIES ARTICLE 8 — OTHER WORK AT THE SITE ARTICLE 9 — OWNER'S AND OPT'S RESPONSIBILITIES 9.01 Communications to Contractor A. OPT issues communications to Contractor through OAR except as otherwise provided in the Contract Documents. 9.02 Replacement of Owner's Project Team Members A. Owner may replace members of the OPT at its discretion. 9.03 Furnish Data A. OPT is to furnish the data required of OPT under the Contract Documents. 9.04 Pay When Due A. Owner is to make payments to Contractor when due as described in Paragraphs 15.01.D and 15.06.D. Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions - 11 Exhibit F Page 11 of 14 9.05 Lands and Easements; Reports and Tests A. Owner's duties with respect to providing lands and easements are described in Paragraph 5.01. OPT will make copies of reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions and drawings of physical conditions relating to existing surface or subsurface structures at the Site available to Contractor in accordance with Paragraph 5.03. 9.06 Insurance A. Owner's responsibilities with respect to purchasing and maintaining insurance are described in Article 6. 9.07 Modifications A. Owner's responsibilities with respect to Modifications are described in Article 11. 9.08 Inspections, Tests, and Approvals A. OPT's responsibility with respect to certain inspections, tests, and approvals are described in Paragraph 14.02. 9.09 Limitations on OPT's Responsibilities A. The OPT does not supervise, direct, or have control or authority over, and is not responsible for Contractor's means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction, or related safety precautions and programs, or for failure of Contractor to comply with Laws and Regulations applicable to the performance of the Work. OPT is not responsible for Contractor's failure to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 9.10 Undisclosed Hazardous Environmental Condition A. OPT's responsibility for undisclosed Hazardous Environmental Conditions is described in Paragraph 5.06. 9.11 Compliance with Safety Program A. Contractor is to inform the OPT of its safety programs and OPT is to comply with the specific applicable requirements of this program. ARTICLE 10 — OAR'S AND DESIGNER'S STATUS DURING CONSTRUCTION 10.01 Owner's Representative A. OAR is Owner's representative. The duties and responsibilities and the limitations of authority of OAR as Owner's representative are described in the Contract Documents. 10.02 Visits to Site A. Designer is to make periodic visits to the Site to observe the progress and quality of the Work. Designer is to determine, in general, if the Work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents based on observations made during these visits. Designer is not required to make exhaustive or continuous inspections to check the quality or quantity of Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions - 12 Exhibit F Page 12 of 14 the Work. Designer is to inform the OPT of issues or concerns and OAR is to work with Contractor to address these issues or concerns. Designer's visits and observations are subject to the limitations on Designer's authority and responsibility described in Paragraphs 9.09 and 10.07. B. OAR is to observe the Work to check the quality and quantity of Work, implement Owner's quality assurance program, and administer the Contract as Owner's representative as described in the Contract Documents. OAR's visits and observations are subject to the limitations on OAR's authority and responsibility described in Paragraphs 9.09 and 10.07. 10.03 Resident Project Representatives A. Resident Project Representatives assist OAR in observing the progress and quality of the Work at the Site. The limitations on Resident Project Representatives' authority and responsibility are described in Paragraphs 9.09 and 10.07. 10.04 Rejecting Defective Work A. OPT has the authority to reject Work in accordance with Article 14. OAR is to issue a Defective Work Notice to Contractor and document when Defective Work has been corrected or accepted in accordance with Article 14. 10.05 Shop Drawings, Modifications and Payments A. Designer's authority related to Shop Drawings and Samples are described in the Contract Documents. B. Designer's authority related to design calculations and design drawings submitted in response to a delegation of professional design services are described in Paragraph 7.15. C. OAR and Designer's authority related to Modifications is described in Articles 11. D. OAR's authority related to Applications for Payment is described in Articles 13 and 15. 10.06 Decisions on Requirements of Contract Documents and Acceptability of Work A. OAR is to render decisions regarding non-technical or contractual / administrative requirements of the Contract Documents and will coordinate the response of the OPT to Contractor. B. Designer is to render decisions regarding the conformance of the Work to the requirements of the Contract Documents. Designer will render a decision to either correct the Defective Work, or accept the Work under the provisions of Paragraph 14.04, if Work does not conform to the Contract Documents. OAR will coordinate the response of the OPT to Contractor. C. OAR will issue a Request for a Change Proposal if a Modification is required. OAR will provide documentation for changes related to the non-technical or contractual / administrative requirements of the Contract Documents. Designer will provide documentation if design related changes are required. D. Contractor may appeal Designer's decision by submitting a Change Proposal if Contractor does not agree with the Designer's decision. Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions - 13 Exhibit F Page 13 of 14 10.07 Limitations on OAR's and Designer's Authority and Responsibilities A. OPT is not responsible for the acts or omissions of Contractor's Team. No actions or failure to act, or decisions made in good faith to exercise or not exercise the authority or responsibility available under the Contract Documents creates a duty in contract, tort, or otherwise of the OPT to the Contractor or members of the Contractor's Team. ARTICLE 11— AMENDING THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS; CHANGES IN THE WORK ARTICLE 12 — CLAIMS ARTICLE 13 — COST OF THE WORK; ALLOWANCES; UNIT PRICE WORK ARTICLE 14 — TESTS AND INSPECTIONS; CORRECTION, REMOVAL, OR ACCEPTANCE OF DEFECTIVE WORK ARTICLE 15 — PAYMENTS TO CONTRACTOR; SET -OFFS; COMPLETION; CORRECTION PERIOD ARTICLE 16 — SUSPENSION OF WORK AND TERMINATION ARTICLE 17 — FINAL RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES ARTICLE 18 — MISCELLANEOUS END OF SECTION Excerpt from Form 00 72 00 General Conditions - 14 Exhibit F Page 14 of 14 Solid Waste Management Consultants and Contractors 1901 Central Drive Suite 550 Bedford, Texas 76021- 5872 817 571-2288 FAX 817 571-2188 www.scsengineers.com SCS ENGINEERS December 21, 2016 SCS Project No. 16216087.00 Mr. J. H. Edmonds, P.E. Director of Engineering Services City of Corpus Christi PO Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 Subject: Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Gas Collection and Control System (GCCS) City Project No. E16289 Bid Evaluation Dear Mr. Edmonds: SCS Engineers (SCS) is pleased to provide the City of Corpus Christi (City) our bid evaluation for Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Gas Collection and Control System (GCCS). This bid evaluation is based on the bids and qualification statements provided to SCS by the City of Corpus Christi Engineering Services following the Bid Opening on December 14, 2016 for the referenced project. The following is a summary of the bid evaluation: • A total of five bids were received by the City at the Bid Opening. The five bids ranged from $1,019,690.00 (low total base bid) to $1,964,545.00 (high total base bid) including Parts A (General) and B ($100,000 Allowance). A bid (Landmarc Environmental Systems LLC.) was deemed non-responsive for not providing a signed Bid Acknowledgement Form. For your review, a copy of the Bid Tabulation and Bid Proposal Review Results is provided in Attachment 1 and 2, respectively. • Tri Con Works L.L.C. (Tri Con) of Houston, Texas is the apparent low bidder on the project. Tri Con tendered a low total base bid of $1,019,690.00 for the referenced project. This total base bid amount includes Parts A (General) and Part B ($100,000 Allowance). Additionally, there were no errors, omissions, or irregularities found on the submitted bid. • Tri Con has landfill GCCS construction experience and meets the minimum qualifications stated in the bid documents. • SCS has contacted references submitted by Tri Con in accordance with Section 00 45 16 — Statement of Experience (Attachment 3), and the references gave overall good recommendations for their work on the respective construction projects. Additionally, SCS has had an overall good experience working with Tri Con on similar projects. M:\Proj\Waco\16215113...\Task 18... \ Bid Phase\Bid Recommendation\L122016 Cefe Valenzual LF Bid Recommendation Mr. J. H. Edmonds, P.E. December 21, 2016 Page 2 Therefore, based on the above bid evaluation, SCS recommends that Parts A (General) and B ($100,000 Allowance) for the City of Corpus Christi Cefe Valenzuela Landfill Gas Collection and Control System (GCCS) be awarded to Tri Con Works L.L.C. for a total contract amount of $1,019,690.00. If you have any questions or need additional information regarding our bid evaluation, please feel free to contact Ryan Kuntz, P.E. at (817) 358-6117 or Brett DeVries, E.I.T. at (817) 358-6110. Sincerely, 46) 13ructit Ryan Kuntz, P.E. Proj ect Director SCS ENGINEERS TBPE Registration No. F-3407 Brett DeVries, E.I.T. Senior Staff Professional SCS ENGINEERS Enclosures: Attachment 1 — Bid Tabulation Attachment 2 — Bid Proposal Review Results Attachment 3 — Tri Con Works L.L.0 Section 00 45 16 — Statement of Experience M:AProj ACorpus Christi \16216087.00... \Bid Phase ABid Tab \L122016 Cefe Valenzual LF Bid Recommendation ATTACHMENT 1 TABULATION OF BIDS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES- CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS TABULATED BY: Ryan Kuntz, P.E. -SCS Engineers DATE: Friday, December 16, 2016 ENGINEERS ESTIMATE: $1,525,360 TIME OF COMPLETION: 203 Calendar Days CefeValenzuda Landfill Gas Collection and Control System)GCCS) CITY PROJECT NO. 616289 Opinion of Probable Construction Cort Tri Con Work; LLC. 1211 Hollywood St. Houston, TX 17135 American Environmental Group, LTO. 30 Brecksville Rd, Suite 100 Richfield, 01194286 CM! Ervironmerrcal&Infrartrueure, Ina 9171 Essen Lane Baton Rouge, 7809 Belair Builderz, Inc d/b/a Belair Stemork Services 2200 Old Highway 8 NW Nem Brighton, MN 55112 Landman Environmental Systems LLC.' 1616 Bond St, Suite TCG Naperville, IL 60563 ITEM DESCRIPTION I UNIT I 'c":1 I.. UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL PART RAL AMobilllEation Al LS $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 28,000.00 $ 28,000.00 $ 63,000.00 $ 63,000.00 63,780.00 63,780.00 $ 202,846.00 202,846.00 $ 25,000.00 $25,000.00 A2 Vertical LFG Extraction Wells (6 -inch HOPE) VF 1,650 85.00 $ 140,250.00 65.00 $ 107,250.00 90.00 $ 148,500.00 70.00 115,500.00 111.00 183,150.00 90.00 $148,500.00 Well Abandonment VF 300 50.00 $ 15,000.00 24.00 $ 7,200.00 30.00 9,000.00 23.00 6,900.00 15.00 4,500.00 45.00 $13,500.00 Trench Safety LF 1,050 20.00 $ 21,000.00 5.00 $ 5,250.00 1.00 1,050.00 11.00 11,550.00 7.00 7,350.00 10.25 $10,762.50 2 -inch Dia. Vertical Wellhead EA 26 900.00 $ 23,400.00 920.00 $ 23,920.00 750.00 $ 19,500.00 725.00 $ 18,850.00 $ 3,400.00 $ 88,400.00 $ 1,000.00 $26,000.00 A6 2 -inch HOPESDR 9 Air Supply Line (Common Trench) LF 5,550 $ 2.70 $ 14,985.00 $ 2.00 $ 11,100.00 $ 2.50 $ 13,875.00 $ 2.00 $ 11,100.00 $ 2.50 $ 13,875.00 $ 3.00 $ 16,650.00 27 2 -inch HOPE SOR SSingle-Contained Condensate Forcemaln (Common lateral Trench) T LF 1,150 $ 250 $ 2,875.00 $ 2.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 2.50 $ 2,875.00 $ 2.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 2.80 $ 3,220.00 $ 3.00 $ 3,450.00 AE 3 -inch HOPE SOR 11 Single�ntained Condensate Forcemaln (Common Header TTrench) LF 4,000 $ 3.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 3.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 3.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 2.50 $ 10,000.00 $ 3.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 3.50 $ 14,000.00 3 -inch HOPE 3DR 11 Single -Contained Condensate Forcemaln (Seperate Trench) LF 200 $ 15.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 12.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 29.00 $ 5,800.00 $ 16.00 $ 3,200.00 $ 22.00 $ 4,400.00 $ 16.00 $ 3,200.00 Al 3 -inch 3DR 11 x 6 -inch 3DR 11 HOPE Dual -Contained Condensate Forcemain Trench) lF 450 $ 2600 $ 9,000.00 $ 11.50 $ 5,175.00 $ 21.00 $ 9,450.00 $ 11.00 $ 4,950.00 $ 16.00 $ 7,200.00 $ 19.50 $ 8,7/5.00 AS 3 -Inch 3DR 11 x 6 -inch 3DR 11 HOPE Dual -Contained Condensate ain(Sepaate Trench) LF 650 $ 00 $ 22,75600 21.00 $ 13,650.00 32.00 $ 20,800.00 32.00 20,800.00 41.00 26,650.00 29.50 $19,175.00 6 -Inch HOPE 3DR 11 lateral LF 3,150 20.50 $ 64,575.00 20.00 $ 63,000.00 18.00 $ 56,700.00 20.00 63,000.00 47.00 148,050.00 22.00 $69,300.00 8 -inch HOPE 3DR 11 Header Pipe LF 2,300 30.00 $ 69,000.00 21.00 $ 48,300.00 24.00 $ 55,200.00 22.00 50,600.00 29.00 66,700.00 27.00 $62,100.00 18 -inch HOPE 3DR 11 Header Pipe LF 2,400 85.00 $ 204,000.00 48.00 $ 115,200.00 58.00 $ 139,200.00 55.00 132,000.00 60.00 144,000.00 67.50 $162,000.00 flinch HOPE 3DR 11 Header Pipe LF 1,650 131.00 $ 216,150.00 76.00 $ 125,400.00 100.00 $ 165,000.00 83.00 136,950.00 110.00 181,500.00 116.00 $ 191,400.00 AS24-inch HOPE 3DR 26 Header Pipe LF 450 $ 125.00 $ 56,250.00 $ 72.00 $ 32,400.00 $ 81.00 $ 36,450.00 $ 300.00 $ 135,000.00 $ 76.00 $ 34,200.00 $ 106.00 $ 4],]00.00 222sembly 2 -inch Condensate Air Supply Isolation and Blowoff Valve As EA 5 $ 00 $ 0 $ 00 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 00 $ 0 $ 00 $ 0 $ 00 $5,500.00 Condensate For7maln Isolation Valve Assembly EA 5 $ 1,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 1,310.00 $ 6,550.00 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 1,100.00 5,500.00 1,950.00 9,750.00 1,600.00 $8,000.00 8 -inch Isolation Valve (Gear Operated) EA $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,850.00 $ 1,850.00 2,300.00 2,300.00 1,600.00 1,600.00 9,015.00 9,015.00 $ 2,500.00 $2,500.00 flinch Isolation Valve (Gear Operated) EA $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 3,800.00 6,500.00 6,500.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 9,500.00 9,500.00 $ 7,000.00 $7,000.00 18 -inch Isolation Valve(Gear Operated) EA $ 14,400.00 $ 28,800.00 $ 8,900.00 $ 17,800.00 12,000.00 $ 24,000.00 10,500.00 21,000.00 19,200.00 $ 38,400.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 28,000.00 A22 24 -inch Isolation Valve(Gear Operated) EA 2 $ 18,000.00 $ 36,000.00 $ 19,500.00 $ 39,000.00 $ 19,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 16,500.00 $ 33,000.00 $ 29,600.00 $ 59,200.00 $ 22,500.00 $ 45,000.00 2271847060880881861700 Single-Contained&Pump (CS4) EA $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 18,500.00 $ 18,500.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 37,300.00 $ 37,,300.00 $ 17,900.00 $ 17,000.00 22E,and flinch Single -Contained Condensate Sump & Pump (CST, CS -2, CS -3) EA $ 2 0 $ 75,00600 $ 24,800.00 $ 74,400.00 27,00600 $ 81,000.00 $ 26,000.00 $ 78,000.00 $ 38,000.00 114,000.00 $ 24,300.00 $72,900.00 12 -inch CMP Road Crossing LF 155 65.00 $ 10,075.00 33.00 $ 5,115.00 125.00 $ 19,375.00 180.00 27,900.00 127.00 19,685.00 43.00 $6,665.00 18 -inch CMP Road Crossing 70 75.00 $ 5,250.00 39.00 $ 2,730.00 100.00 7,000.00 140.00 9,800.00 225.00 15,750.00 68.00 $4,760.00 36 -inch CMP Road Crossing LF 70 200.00 $ 14,000.00 55.00 $ 3,850.00 275.00 $ 19,250.00 375.00 26,250.00 270.00 $ 18,900.00 100.00 $7,000.00 A28 Installation of Blower/Flare and Compressor IS 1 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 24,750.00 $ 24,750.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 57,000.00 $ 57,,000.00 $ 11,808.00 $ 11,808.00 $ 65,574.05 $ 65,574.05 A29 Blower/Flare Facility Site Preparation/Grading/Foundations IS $ 0 $ 100,000.00 $ 41,500.00 $ 41,500.00 90,000.00 $ 90,000.00 $ 127,000.00 127,000.00 128,747.00 128,747.00 $ 45,719.33 $ 45,719.33 A30 Electrical Hookup of Blower/Flare and Compressor LS $ 56,000.00 $ 56,000.00 $ 24,000.00 $24,000.00 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2 $44,056.92 A31 Seeding and Fertilizer IS 1 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,925.00 $ 2,925.00 $ 5,400.00 $ 5,400.00 $ 2,900.00 $ 2,900.00 222 15 HP Rotary Screw Air,Oil/Water Separator, Pad, Interconnecting Piping, and 12,12Dryer, eCover 12 1 $ 35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 27,500.00 $ 27,500.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 26,190.00 $ 26,190.00 $ 100,450.00 $ 100,450.00 $ 41,500.00 $ 41,500.00 A33 Crain Link Security Fence and Gates(Single-and Double -Swing) IS $ 18,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 24,000.00 $ 24,000.00 16,975.00 16,975.00 $ 18,145.00 $ 18,145.00 $ 15,275.00 $ 15,275.00 A34 Propane Tank and Interconnecting Piping IS 1 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 2,340.00 $ 2,340.00 $ 20,235.00 $ 20,235.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 SUBTOTAL PART A(ITEMSA1 to A3a) $ 1A25,360.e0 $ 919,69000 $ 1,279,225.00 $ 1,29774000 $ 1,864,545.90 $ 1,24876280 PART -Allowances 811Allowance 1 LS 1 1 1$ 100,000.001$ 100,000.001$ 100,000.001$ 100,000.001$ 100,000.001$ 100,000.001$ 100,000.001$ 100,000.001$ 100,000.001$ 100,000.001$ 100,000.001$ 100,000.00 SUBTOTAL PART ALLOWANCES(ITEMB1) $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT BASE BID (PARTS A AND B) $ 1,525,360.00 $ 1,019,690.00 $ 1,379,325.00 $ 1,39),)90.00 $ 1,960,595.00 $ 1,348,762.8) 1 The bid has been deemed nonresponsive for not providing a signed Bid Acknowledgement Form, and has been provided for Information purposes only. ATTACHMENT 2 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT - BID PROPOSAL REVIEW RESULTS Project Name/No.: Project Mgr.: Consultant: E16289 Cefe F. Valenzuela Landfill Gas Collection and Control System Brian Bresler, PE Ryan Kuntz, PE—SCS Engrs Bid Date: Wed — 12/14/16 Const Est: $1,526,000 Cal Days: 203 Addenda: 01 # Bid Proposals Received: 05 Reviewed By: SyLviavAv'viacw Date: Dece i.b r 14, 2016 Any bid proposal submittal found to contain an error, omission or irregularity will be forwarded to the City Attorney for further review. Contractor: Tri Con Works LLC 1211 Hollywood Houston, TX 77015 American Environmental Group Ltd dba Environmental Group of Ohio LLC 3600 Brecksville Rd Richfield, Ohio 44286 CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. 4171 Essen Lane Baton Rouge, LA 70809 Landmarc Environmental Systems LLC 1316 Bond St #108 Naperville, IL 60563 Belair Bldrs Inc dba Belair Sitework Services 2200 Old Hwy 8 NW New Brighton, MN 55112 Bid Bond: yes yes yes yes yes POA: yes yes yes yes yes Proposal Signed: yes yes yes no yes Acknowledge Addenda: yes yes yes Yes yes Non Resident Bidder: yes yes yes yes yes Disclosure of Interest: Yes yes yes yes yes Non Collusion: yes yes yes yes yes Comments: Bid pkg included SOE (HC) n/a (HC) n/a (HC) Bidder did not sign proposal, missing page 5 of Bid Acknow. Form n/a pg. 1 Attachment 3 00 4516 STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE ARTICLE 1— REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE 1.01 To be considered a responsive Bidder, the three lowest Bidders must complete and submit the Statement of Experience within 5 days after the date Bids are due to demonstrate the Bidders' responsibility and ability to meet the minimum requirements to complete the Work. Failure to submit the required information in the Statement of Experience may result in the Owner considering the Bid non-responsive and result in rejection of the Bid by the Owner. The Bid Security of the Bidder will be forfeited if Bidder fails to deliver the Statement of Experience in an attempt to be released from its Bid. Bidders may be required to provide supplemental information if requested by the Owner to clarify, enhance or supplement the information provided in the Statement of Experience. 1.02 Bidders must provide the information requested in this Statement of Experience using the forms attached to this Section. A copy of these forms can be provided in Microsoft Word to assist with the preparation of the Statement of Experience. Information in these forms must be provided completely and in detail. Information that cannot be totally incorporated in the form may be included in an attachment to the form. This attachment must be clearly referenced by attachment number in the form, and the attached material must include the attachment number on every sheet of the attachment. The attachment must include only the information that responds to the question or item number to which the attachment information applies. 1.03 The Bidder may also be required to supply a financial statement, prepared no later than 90 days prior to the City Engineer's request, signed and dated by the Bidder's owner, president or other authorized party, specifying all current assets and liabilities. ARTICLE 2 — EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS 2.01 The Bidder agrees that, in addition to determining the apparent low Bid, the Owner will consider the responsiveness of the Bids and the responsibility of the Bidders in awarding a Contract for this Project. Information that indicates the Bidder or a Subcontractor is not responsible or that might negatively impact a Bidder's ability to complete the Work within the Contract Time and for the Contract Price may result in the Owner rejecting the Bid. 2.02 If none of the three apparent low Bidders are deemed responsible, the Owner may notify the next apparent low Bidders in order, who will then be required to submit the Statement of Experience for review, until a Contract is awarded or all Bids have been rejected. 2.03 The Bidder is responsible for the accuracy and completeness of all of the information provided by the Bidder or a proposed Subcontractor In response to this Statement of Experience. 2.04 Provide general information about the organization as required in Table 1. Describe the organizational structure of the Bidder's organization as it relates to this Project in Table 2. 2.05 Provide resumes for the key personnel that will be actively working on this Project. A. Key personnel include the Project Manager, Project Superintendent, Safety Manager and Quality Control Manager. If key personnel are to fulfill more than one of the roles listed above, provide a written narrative describing how much time will be devoted to each function, their qualifications to fulfill each role, and the percentage of their time that will be devoted to each role. If the individual is not to be devoted solely to this Project, indicate how that individual's time is to be divided between this Project and other assignments. B. The Bidder may provide resumes for an alternate individual if the Bidder is not able to commit to one individual for the Project at the time the Bid is submitted. Qualifications of these individuals will be considered in determining whether the experience of the Bidder meets the minimum requirements. The Bidder must provide the services of the proposed key personnel for the life of the Project as a condition of Statement of Experience 00 45 16 -1 Cefe Valenzuela Landfill — Gas Collection and Control System, Project No. E16289 Rev 06-22-2016 Attachment 3 qualification. Failure to provide the proposed Key Personnel may result in the disqualification of the Bidder and may void the award of the Contract. C. Provide information for each primary and alternate candidate that includes: technical experience, managerial experience, education and formal training and a work history which describes project experience, including the roles and responsibilities for each assignment. Additional information demonstrating experience that meets the minimum requirements should also be included. D. The Project Manager and Project Superintendent must have at least 5 years of recent experience in the management and oversight of projects of a similar size and complexity to this Project. This experience must include scheduling of manpower and materials, safety, coordination of Subcontractors, experience with the submittal process, Federal and State wage rate requirements and contract close-out procedures. The Project Superintendent is to be present at the Site at all times that Work is being performed. Foremen must have at least 5 years of recent experience in similar work and be subordinate to the Project Superintendent. Foremen cannot act as a superintendent without prior written approval from the Owner. E. To be considered a responsible bidder, the General Contractor and Subcontractor(s) shall demonstrate that they have experience with the construction and installation of landfill gas collection and control systems at municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills. The Contractor shall have performed a minimum of 10 similar projects requiring the construction and installation of landfill gas (LFG) vertical extraction wells, blower and flare, below -grade LFG header and lateral piping, and condensate sumps and pumps. In the event that a Subcontractor(s) is conducting a portion of the work, the experience criteria is applicable to that role. 2.06 Provide information on the project experience and past performance of the organization. A. Provide information on projects that have been awarded to the Organization in the last 5 years in Table 3. Attach additional pages if necessary. Experience must include the satisfactory completion of at least five similar projects within the last 5 years for the Bidder's organization that are equal to or greater in size and magnitude than the current Project. B. In determining the responsibility of the Bidder, the Owner will consider the Bidder's past projects and any substandard quality of workmanship on completed projects. The Owner will consider whether the Bidder's past project experience shows substandard quality of workmanship, issues related to a substandard appearance of the completed work, the amount of warranty or rework required, problems with durability and maintainability of the completed project, and problems with the lack of quality of documentation provided. In addition to the work produced, the Owner may consider issues related to the quality of construction practices, responsiveness to the owner's needs during construction, an inability to work in the spirit of partnering and any non -responsiveness of the Bidder to make warranty corrections. Information to make this determination will come from Owner's interviews with references provided for this project. By listing reference contact information in this Statement of Experience, Bidder indicates its approval for OPT to contact the individuals listed as a reference. ARTICLE 3 — SAFETY EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS 3.01 The Bidder agrees that pursuant to Section 252.0435 of the Local Government Code, the Owner will consider the safety record of the Bidder prior to awarding contracts. The Owner has adopted the following written definitions and criteria for determining the Bidder's safety record. 3.02 The Bidder's safety record will be used to determine if the Bidder can be deemed responsible. 3.03 Provide general information about the safety record of the organization as required in Table 4. A. For purposes of providing this information, the following terms shall have the following meanings: Statement of Experience 00 45 16 - 2 Cefe Valenzuela Landfill — Gas Collection and Control System, Project No. E16289 Rev 06-22-2016 Attachment 3 1. "Bidder" includes the firm, corporation, partnership, or other legal entity represented by the Bidder or anyone acting for such firm, corporation, partnership, or other legal entity submitting the bid. 2. "Citations" include notices of violation, notices of enforcement, suspension/revocation of state or federal licenses or registrations, fines assessed pending criminal complaints, indictments, convictions, administrative orders, draft orders, final orders, and judicial final judgments. Notice of Violations and Notice of Enforcement received from the TCEQ shall include those classified as major violations and moderate violations under the TCEQ's regulations for documentation of Compliance History, 30 Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 60.2 (c) (1) and (2). 3. "Environmental Protection Agency" includes, but is not limited to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (the "TCEQ"), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA"), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Texas Department of State Health Services, the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, the Structural Pest Control Service, agencies of local governments responsible for enforcing environmental protection laws or regulations, and similar regulatory agencies of other states of the United States. B. In determining the responsibility of the Bidder, the Owner will consider the following in regards to Table 4: 1. Whether the Bidder's response in reveals more than two (2) cases in which final orders have been entered by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (the "OSHRC") against the Bidder for serious violations of Occupational Safety and Health Administration ("OSHA") regulations within the past five (5) years. 2. Whether the Bidder's response reveals more than one (1) case in which Bidder has received a citation or for which final orders have been entered from an environmental protection agency for violations within the past five (5) years. 3. Whether the Bidder's response reveals that the Bidder has been convicted of a criminal offense or has been subject to a judgment for a negligent act or omission, which resulted in serious bodily injury or death, within the past ten (10) years. C. The Owner may consider the responses to each question in Table 4 separately when determining the responsibility of the Bidder. The Owner may also consider the cumulative impact of the information generated by the Bidder's responses. ARTICLE 4— PROVIDE INFORMATION TO DEMONSTRATE THE ABILITY OF THE BIDDER TO PROVIDE SUBCONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES THAT WILL MEET THE OWNER'S ESTABLISHED GOALS FOR MINORITY, MBE, AND DBE PARTICIPATION IN THE PROJECT. LIST ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY QUALIFIED MINORITY, MBE AND DBE -PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS OR SUPPLIERS IN TABLE 5. INCLUDE PERCENTAGES OF WORK SUBCONTRACTED TO EACH TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH OWNER'S STATED GOALS.STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS 4.01 Provide one printed copy of the Statement of Experience using the referenced tables and narrative descriptions as described in Article 2. Pages are to be 8-1/2 x 11 pages using a minimum font size of 10. A limited number of 11 x 17 sheets may be used, and must be folded to the size of an 8-1/2 x 11 page. 4.02 Provide a digital copy of the Statement of Experience in Portable Document Format (PDF) on a CD, portable drive, or other digital recording device. This digital copy is to include all information required to evaluate the Bid and should match the content of the printed copy of the Bid. When creating the digital copy: A. Create PDF documents from native format files. B. Rotate pages so that the top of the document appears at the top of the file when opened in PDF viewing software. Statement of Experience 00 45 16 - 3 Cefe Valenzuela Landfill — Gas Collection and Control System, Project No. E16289 Rev 06-22-2016 Attachment 3 C. Submit PDF documents with adequate resolution to allow documents to be printed in a format equivalent to the original documents. Documents are to be scalable to allow printing on standard 8-1/2 x 11 or 11 x 17 paper. D. Submit color PDF documents if color is used in the printed version of the documents. Statement of Experience 00 4516 - 4 Cefe Valenzuela Landfill — Gas Collection and Control System, Project No, E16289 Rev 06-22-2016 Attachment 3 Table 1- Organization Information Organization doing business as: Tri Com WOKS, L1 -C, Business Address of Principal Office Ill 1 l+g l ki wond Si-. Rous -fon f 110t c Telephone No. Website II WNW. tri wo rKt. carr. Form of Business (check one) ill Corporation 0 Partnership • Individual jt_C. If a Corporation State of Incorporation T'ex,a s Date of Incorporation it- 2 3 . lot `'1 l Chief Executive Officer's Name President's Name Fj i „ n htn s Vice President's Name(s) Co- Prf s i ai�-k &arts W. Srn,+1, Secretary's Name Geo -10W .SAA.A.,.(-t.,, Treasurer's Name 5Ci,p-iJ . 1-1-, Sryu f, If a Partnership Date of Organization Form of Partnership: • General 0 Limited If an Individual Name Ownership of Organization List of companies, firms, or organizations that own any part of the organization. Names of Companies, Firms, or Organizations Percent Ownership Tri Cor. tkoldims r, c . IGD "ip 1.T Organization History List of names that this organization currently, has, or anticipates operating under including the names of related companies presently doing business. Names of Organizations From Date To Date Tr r Con Works , LLC. 04 1 or frf C,lcrre Tri Con I/Vork.s, L 1° 12/23 f 7 D3/.'f pit Indicators of Organization Size Average number of current full-time employees 7o Average estimate of revenue for the current year $ /S MM Statement of Experience Cefe Valenzuela Landfill - Gas Collection and Control System, Project No. E16289 004516-5 Rev 06-22-2016 Attachment 3 Table 1— Organization Information Organization doing business as: 771 6011 Works , I.LC. Previous History with City of Corpus Christi List the 5 most recent projects that have been completed with the City of Corpus Christi. Project Name Year 1 (!Q -e. E Vat zv.elcL LW'44 (i gm—U.15 CUni.ve(s;4 of Texas tlria.sito) 2013 2 3 4 5 Construction Site Safety Experience Provide Bidders Experience Modification Ratio (EMR) History for the last 3 years. Provide documentation of the EMR. Year 2O1(0 EMR ,t1 Year 2,015 EMR ,fie Year 2.014 EMR /1/ Previous Bidding and Construction Experience Has Bidder or a predecessor organization been disqualified as a bidder within the last 10 years? List Projects below and provide full details in a separate attachment if yes. NO Has Bidder or a predecessor organization been released from a bid or proposal in the past 10 years? List Projects below and provide full details in a separate attachment if yes. 10 Has Bidder or a predecessor organization ever defaulted on a project or failed to complete any work awarded to it? List Projects below and provide full details in a separate attachment if yes. )t0 Has Bidder or a predecessor organization been involved in claims or litigation involving project owners within the last 10 years? List Projects below and provide full details in a separate attachment if yes. u0 Have liens or claims for outstanding unpaid invoices been filed against the Bidder for services or materials on any projects begun within the preceding 3 years? Specify the name and address of the party holding the lien or making the claim, the amount and basis for the lien or claim, and an explanation of why the lien has not been released or that the claim has not been paid if yes. NO Statement of Experience Cefe Valenzuela Landfill — Gas Collection and Control System, Project No. E16289 004516-6 Rev 06-22-2016 Attachment 3 Table 2 — Project Information Organization doing business as: TI Cor. Works. u.C. Proposed Project Organization Provide a brief description of the organizational structure proposed for this project indicating the names and functional roles of proposed key personnel and alternates. Provide resumes for Project Manager, Superintendent, Safety Manager and Quality Control Manager. Position Primary Alternate Project Manager &IA. m gushy • IZay►vtoriI dalc&vwicz, Superintendent 1?U,IOCK Uihrt's Mair -in. Safety Manager LAtAa. Sus 4t,litip flush:" Quality Control Manager �/ I _' Kyle. Wa.LKir gD I_ nian 6b60). .5 Division of work between Bidder and Proposed Subcontractor and Suppliers Provide a list of Work to be self -performed by the Bidder and the Work contracted to Subcontractors and Suppliers for more than 10 percent of the Work (based on estimated subcontract or purchase order amounts and the Contract Price). Description of Work Name of Entity Performing the Work Estimated Percentage of Contract Price 6Orltxt-Q T8 D /. 5 See_oLing TBD , 0t °lo Fence. 7a b I. 57, Flearica( Fisher COmmuncudions 2% Subcontractor Construction Site Safety Experience Provide Experience Modification Ratio (EMR) History for the last 3 years for Subcontractors that will provide Work valued at 25% or more of the Contract Price. Provide documentation of the EMR. Subcontractor 'Mr) Year EMR Year EMR Year EMR Subcontractor Year EMR 1 Year EMR Year EMR Statement of Experience Cefe Valenzuela Landfill — Gas Collection and Control System, Project No. E16289 004516-7 Rev 06-22-2016 Attachment 3 Table 3 - Projects Awarded during the Last 5 Years Organization doing business as: T-1' Cort t VCyk, , LI,C Project Information Project Name 20110 Lpad417/ eau Coiled n SysieM & dnsion Pvvjec# Description elver B;ra, 1.4.4411 Witt -Al 6i06 t ecpa n /On f nc&&att:.5 11.11 "J Reference Contact Information Project Owner RiYer Etrc G. 1 Ll,l✓ Jik it Progress Name/Title -rota iiti, o'Son Telephone 50. 43`. I21�g Email "rr cko150n @r(VPr�012h LG.Com Project Designer jgjo4ef Whorl CE.c (%C�,riSo4 Eiw ro,vnt, IGA Cmi ttir..f') , Project Budget and Performance Original Contract Price n�-�1 i 1911 090.00 Final Contract Price n TSD # Contract Days P} # Days Late 0 Issues/Claims/ Litigation: 1� R. Project Information Project NameS LG t2 LOnle3AnCQ Description rJ L' l Sjs-let t Reference Contact Information Project Owner jfpSor'tOturthiau.(l.titnj ab(( ail ith tA> Name/Title tdIR -'"_ d `""'� "J Telephone J Email helco@iowaklet Den. NI+ Project Designer C.J. Lme 3oginetr Letrla,< Eli tonstt 4nAls , j Project Budget and Performance Original Contract Price st1g4, `1 14.00 Final Contract Price �} 1°Z1)21411(7 .80 # Contract Days 30 # Days Late l� V Issues/Claims/ Litigation: MORE. Project Information Project Name 2uii 1%�o 5 %$ -Epctn-Son Description It.t Rt.Bior.a t t..au.ds;41 LAnd "(t Cm. Gaptft,Sfon Reference Contact Information Project Owner Ntx* -TexasMui `"+ t r W his-fr c,± gill ((_ �""" Telephone Email }o -f .con - Project Designer Min MtfirtQs , most,. tOr is. (anis 4rroit Project Budget and Performance Original1l,,,, Contract Price // QMM Ul��v, 3�1,W Final Contract Price 2Q��-' )j 5a0, 3(] #Contract Days 11c # Days Late 0 Issues/Claims/ Litigation: NDOt Statement of Experience Cefe Valenzuela Landfill - Gas Collection and Control System, Project No. E16289 004516-8 Rev 06-22-2016 Attachment 3 Table 3 — Projects Awarded during the Last 5 Years — Not including City of Corpus Christi Projects Organization doing business as: 11l Cc, VVoae.6 , 1,4t, Protect Information Project roja.clei Rio (,AnclA1( Ph0.Se Z Name lUIrciftill bras 0014 -tion S S-4Qrri Description Cada AAAfio LaEi[( CEOS Ceft2clia- S6S-teM Reference Contact Information Project Owner k ,,�"�" 1 �f� 0{ s 0. Fe' Sait+i Solid him Manta" terifu Name/Title R t. Ki er,brock, SFS1JIvtft I KC�ta..five �lrot or u J p � Telephone r Email (k1epenkw-pcx e Sfs turn R.. Oral Project Designer fttelat {L, 3C S A ineer3 J Project Budget and performance J Original Contract Price n/ 0 11V(0161 R(, Final Contrail Price 'a �+ 17.7 LI jq, 55 # Contract Days 3 (1 # Days Late 0 Issues/Claims/ Litigation: Nita Project Information Project Name 201(p G -GCS EY-fans/on c�AI1 estAC0ln4,ij f pcsoi, LLC bahleDescription S^a'' 00(em,44/1 Mil.( acts Ejcptntion Reference Contact Information Project Owner Sou>pseyt l(o C I at. (flii651,, i NC) Name/Title Daitd Peeper Telephone Email david, feieer�.l,�roS4-e lit�,w+ ,s , 4101 -,Project Designer John r4rr(A Aon 1 atlt.l' .1tird ; Zit - Project Budget and Performance Original Contract Price tt yip `(Tq. (p O Final Contract Price (O % 4( . 3' # Contract Days # Days Late Issues/Claims/ Litigation: Nom, Protect Information Project Name iammitr Floe Convow•.JL Pal° VivaIM&(( Description I*alr+4 VieN Luelk Reference Contact Information Project Owner 411j��()C UAW (tssO '() Name/Title 0:00(/6 Telephone Email .( A@ Caja lanvvnr. or9 Project Designer 1)(tSAA VitkALCAL8 VioaVPl £Ot 1,( ztA,* &rail Project Budget and Performance Original Contract Price $2/1 (Q 12. oo Final Contract 1,0 n a /. 1� Price zici 612, 00 #Contract Days G0 # Days Late 0 Issues/Claims/ Litigation: Statement of Experience Cefe Valenzuela Landfill — Gas Collection and Control System, Project No. E16289 004516-9 Rev 06-22-2016 Attachment 3 Table 3 - Projects Awarded during the Last 5 Years - Not including City of Corpus Christi Projects Organization doing business as: 1—re CO r% WO c.$, UZ Project Information Project Name ektc to C.*ftriG-fion S y'km Imp rONenv "ta Description G ibe..wk. Li fiaNktil Enc4ritaiiv, S jSfer., Reference Contact Information Project Owner (Id Kivet' It.e6�iDriG.1, i ,,; t� � Name/Title - Telephone Email Vv1rlAtn*vte SrriAra . Com► Project Designer C 3. Lyle €r LonG.r gylgU'1A.2at3 1^Al�tafrAtal Project Budget and Perfor ance VU Original Contract Price r _ 4191)1/ tli0v Final Contract Price k I% 1116.00 # Contract Days 7 0 # Days Late Litigation: Issues/Claims/ Litigation: ' 1 1 \ Project Information Project Name LAMM( Qo.S Coithatior+ O— Cohtrol Su�Sk wsr o %r C l;le Li -Description (11165414- (.6l..cl4:Lt I (s Gt)IC n 04 Gctrnl gyS r Reference Contact Information Project Owner C,�,-kij pf G-6cla„4. (TY-') Name/Title -re re sa Sivitk-i, Snit - r Arum., 116.41cs 1 ban ics @ 3 ar l e.4•A- . Solo Telephone q12.- /DS • 2,142.A Email C] -} wit i-N,,t'd G�ar(a.Kal x.. D / Project Designer i C_ J J W iw lsia4- �{S &O� (� r � Project Budget and Performance Original Contract Price �} W p n� I Io (Q W ,O3 Final Contract Price I 19_I y'�� .017 # Contract Days G D # Days Late d Issues/Claims/ Litigation: 1\10� a Proiect Information Project Name 2O16 Carzd ULI GX s StiS+ers, OonS�4rut1-:.� i Description kah •SitGAS (`,O�ItS-itstai.. t br�+<<'Reference Contact Information Project Owner was* molk zsw -j- of -r 1.S, c, Name/Title 'Nit Dwi ca r ?Can @A,ttt'L.Cot`^- Jo L4A-9 Telephone 512_ $2'3• Q$13 Email st+9E ha,.Lpm_ Project Designer J Project Budget and Performance Original Contract Price 41,373, 61 1"; Final Contrail Price �O Y II 1 Til, # ract Days ,WO #CateDays Issues/Claims/ Litigation: . Moa. Statement of Experience Cefe Valenzuela Landfill — Gas Collection and Control System, Project No. E16289 00 45 16 -10 Rev 06-22-2016 Attachment 3 Table 4 — Safety Record Questionnaire and Statement of Bidder's Safety Experience Organization doing business as: TR CQh Worts, LLG Bidder's Safety Record and Experience Has the Bidder received any Citations for violations of OSHA within the past five (5) years? List Citations below (date and location of Citation) and provide full details in a separate attachment if yes. The full details must include the type of violation or offense, the final disposition of the violation or offense, if any, and the penalty assessed. 64114 -ion - MI5 2.1 2-o1S 67s7/ Oa -hosed. lluSfv..,7) 77o7e See ch -,d. Has the Bidder received any Citations for violations of environmental protection laws or regulations within the past five (5) years? List Citations below (date and location of Citation) and provide full details in a separate attachment if yes. The full details must include the type of violation or offense, the final disposition of the violation or offense, if any, and the penalty assessed. IVO Has the Bidder, within the past ten (10) years, been convicted of a criminal offense or been subject to a judgment for a negligent act or omission, which resulted in serious bodily injury or death? List convictions or judgments below and provide full details in a separate attachment if yes. Io The Owner will consider the following information as additional support to make a determination as to the responsibility of the Bidder. The Bidder must answer the following questions and provide evidence that it meets minimum OSHA construction safety standards and has a lost time injury rate that does not exceed the limits established below: 1 Does the Bidder have a written construction safety program? Yes o No 2 Does the Bidder conduct regular construction site safety inspections? Yes o No 3 Does the Bidder have an active construction safety training program? Yes o No 4 Does the Bidder, or affected subcontractor, have competent persons in the following areas (as applicable to the scope of the current Project): A. Scaffolding Yes ❑ No o N/A B. Excavation Yes ❑ No o N/A C. Cranes & Hoists Yes o No o N/A D. Electrical Yes o No 0 N/A Statement of Experience Cefe Valenzuela Landfill — Gas Collection and Control System, Project No. E16289 00 45 16-11 Rev 06-22-2016 Attachment 3 U.S. Department of Labor Inspection Number: 1061819 Occupational Safety and Health Administration Inspection Date(s): 05/06/2015 - 05/08/2015 Issuance Date: 05/21/2015 Citation and Notification of Penalty Company Name: Tri Con Works, LLC Inspection Site: 5757 Oats Rd., Houston, TX 77078 Citation 1 Item 1 Type of Violation: Serious 29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification: The employer does not ensure that listed or labeled electrical equipment is used or installed in accordance with listing or labeling. This violation occurred on or about April 30, 2015, at the McCarty landfill where employees were exposed to explosion and fire hazards when using a 2-6 McElroy fusion machine (SN: C35529) in electric mode to face a high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe in the presence of methane gas. Pursuant to 29 C.F. R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that listed or labeled electrical equipment is used or installed in accordance with listing or labeling. ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FOR THIS ITEM Date By Which Violation Must be Abated: Proposed Penalty: 06/03/2015 $4410.00 Joann J. Figueroa Area Director See pages 1 through 4 of this Citation and Notification of Penalty for information on employer and employee rights and responsibilities. Citation and Notification of Penalty Page 6 of 8 OSHA -2 Attachment 3 CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET Inspection Number: 1061819 Company Name: Tri Con Works, LLC Inspection Site: 5757 Oats Rd., Houston, TX 77078 Issuance Date: 05/21/2015 List the specific method of correction for each item on this citation in this package that does not read "Corrected During Inspection" and return to: U.S. Department of Labor — Occupational Safety and ':ealth Administration, 690 S. Loop 336 West, Suite 400, Conroe, TX 77304 Citation Number / and Item Number / was corrected on fl -7 1/ Z d /S By (Method of Abatement): SE I V rAL A{Cb Citation Number and Item Number was corrected on By (Method of Abatement): Citation Number and Item Number was corrected on By (Method of Abatement): Citation Number and Item Number was corrected on By (Method of Abatement): Citation Number and Item Number was corrected on By (Method of Abatement): Citation Number and Item Number was corrected on By (Method of Abatement): I certify that the information contained in this document is accurate and that the affected employees and their representatives have been informed of the abatement. Signature Typed or Printed Name Title Date NOTE: 29 USC 666(g) whoever knowingly makes any false statements, representation or certification in any application, record, plan or other documents filed or required to be maintained pursuant to the Act shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 or by imprisonment of not more than 6 months or both. POSTING: A copy of completed Corrective Action Worksheet should be posted for employee review Citation and Notification of Penalty Page 5 of 8 OSHA -2 1211 Hollywood St. Houston, TX 77015 1 Attachment 3 P: 713-453-8654 F: 713-330-9240 Detailed Information Concerning Proper Fusion of HDPE Pipe in Hazardous Conditions Tri Con Works, LLC would like to start off by saying that each and every hazardous condition performed using a fusion weld can be different in some form or fashion. So in describing the proper procedure to safely complete an HDPE weld, where methane gas is present, there are multiple ways of doing so, depending on the situation. Tying into existing gas systems where methane gas may be present is done numerous times on a typical landfill gas expansion, so this is not just an occasional event. It's actually a Targe part of the typical scope of work. As always, safety is of utmost important during these operations. First and foremost, Tri Con will continue to train its employees on the safety aspects in dealing with methane gas and fusion processes. This is accomplished through continuous training during Monday morning safety meetings, Continuing education, post -incident industry reviews, etc. Tri Con will continue to monitor the fusion work area(s) with multi -gas meters, to ensure a safe work environment. If unsafe gas levels are detected, we will immediately cease operations in that area. Then we will assess the situation and take all necessary measures to provide a way to complete the required task(s) in a safe manner. This can be achieved by simply relocating the work area to a safer place, if possible. Sometimes this can be achieved by simply relocating the fusion process to a safer place. If sufficient wind conditions aren't favorable, those occasions may require supplying additional ventilation to the fusion area which can be provided by various types and sizes of fans, blower systems, etc. After safe working conditions have been confirmed to have been restored and are being maintained, work will be resumed in a process appropriate for the new conditions. To safely resume hazardous operations, we must make certain there is no gas flow from the existing, installed pipe(s) under construction. This can sometimes be accomplished by closing valves flowing into the line under construction while using the existing vacuum system from either a flare or gas plant to maintain adequate vacuum on the fusion work area during the fusion process. In other situations the pipes carrying the gas may need to be closed by temporarily inserting an inflatable pneumatic pipe plug into each of the pipes while bolt type flanges are fused onto each of them. Another way to stop the flow of gas from open pipes under construction is to "pinch" them closed, using either manually or hydraulically operated "squeeze - off' tools which then allow the pipes under construction to either be fused directly together or by fusing flanges to each of them. In any of the situations described above, manually powered or hydraulically powered pipe -facing machines could be used to smooth the ends of the HDPE pipes prior to fusion if there were any concerns about using an electric motor in the fusion work area. Gas meter monitoring of the work areas described above would, of course, be performed continually. The Pneumatic plugs would only be effective if flanges could be used. If the situation requires a direct butt fusion, then a squeeze off tool could be used. Once the squeeze - off tools are in place then a manual or hydraulic facer plate could be used. Attachment 3 Another way to achieve the task would be to use an electro -fusion coupling to join the pipes together. However, this process does require two insulated wires which bring electricity from a remotely located portable generator and control box, directly to the fusion coupling while it heats up and seals the pipe connection. Other hazards that exist in welding HDPE pipe in the presence of methane gas are the heater plates to fuse the pipe together. These plates typically get to 350-450 degrees Fahrenheit and need to remain in that range in order to make a proper weld. Where applicable, the heater plate may be unplugged long enough to make a weld. This would depend on the plate itself, size of the pipe, outside temperature and the proper time to heat the pipe. Another thing to be taken into consideration for a safe work area is to keep generators at a safe work distance from potential methane gas concentration areas. These generators are portable and are sometimes mounted on the fusion equipment. These generators are a necessity in order to heat up the heater plates. As far as other equipment to achieve the task at hand, Tri Con has reached out to the McElroy Fusion Equipment Company and visited, in length, about manual facing, heater cool -down periods, explosion -proof fusion equipment, etc. Please see their responses attached. Tri Con has trained and used all of the practices mentioned for many years and will continue to improve safety and awareness for all of its employees, customers or whomever may be near the working area. Tri Con welcomes any input that Republic Services might have to help with a continued safe work site for many years to come. Thank You, Gary W. Smith Attachment 3 McElroy Response Regarding Fusion Equipment From: Gary W. Smith [mailto:gary@triconworks.com] Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 8:04 AM Subject: FW: Questions from Tri Con Jason.. Thanks for taking the time out yesterday to discuss some questions that I have. Here are a few so that I can get my reports done. Does McElroy offer an electric facer plate that is explosion proof? If so could you explain. McElroy does not rate our standard equipment as explosion proof. Because we cannot control the environment our equipment is used in, we are careful to warn and instruct that equipment should only be used in potentially explosive atmospheres with regard to these special procedures. Specifically: 1. Allowing the heater to come up to temperature outside the potentially explosive atmosphere, and then unplugging the heater prior to making the fusion in the potentially explosive atmosphere. 2. On electrically powered facing tools, removing the brushes from the electric motor and turning facer by hand. 3. On equipment with other ignition sources, such as electric motors or internal combustion engines, locating these sources outside the potentially explosive atmosphere, and using a hydraulic hose extension kit to the carriage. Does McElroy offer a hydraulic facer plate for 14 and 26 fusion machines? If so could you explain. No. These machines are designed to be powered from electric power sources for the heater and facer, and the carriage is lever operated. Does McElroy offer a heater plate that is explosion proof? If so could you explain. Our standard heaters are not rated as explosion proof. If you unplug a heater plate to make a weld in an hazardous environment, will the plate stay hot enough to make a acceptable weld? Pipe sizes would range from 2"-24". And the SDR could get up to SDR 11. Will this work if the temperature is say 40 degrees outside. Attachment 3 Generally an acceptable fusion can be obtained in a potentially explosive atmosphere using special procedures. The fusion area may need to be protected from the wind, and/or a special fusion procedure may need to be qualified, in the cases of extremely low ambient temperature, windy environment, or heavy walled pipes. The generally accepted US fusion procedure, ASTM F2620, has been qualified by the industry through extensive testing and should be used where possible. If unplugging the heater plate doesn't work on welding all sizes from 2"-24" does McElroy offer any fusion equipment that would? We have offered custom equipment for special purpose uses in the past and would consider doing so again. *Tri Con response- This would require a new industry standard that would need to apply to all landfill operations and gas contractors. In other words the chances of them building one special tool for one contractor would be unlikely and incur excessive cost. If McElroy doesn't offer explosion proof tools do you see a time in the near future that you would? We have been approached from time to time and have quoted custom explosion proof or ATEX rated tools for mining applications. McElroy equipment is, however, used safely every day in natural gas distribution and methane recovery applications using the precautions outlined above Again Thank You for your time and look forward to your responses. Gary W. Smith Tri Con Works, L.P. 713-822-5476 Attachment 3 Table 4 — Safety Record Questionnaire and Statement of Bidder's Safety Experience Organization doing business as: 17-1 CO el WO is , U,, I✓ E. Fall Protection ^p! Yes o No o N/A F. Confined Spaces yf Yes o No o N/A G. Material Handling lin Yes o No o N/A H. Demolition A Yes o No o N/A I. Steel Erection )m Yes o No o N/A J. Underground Construction y Yes o No o N/A 5 Does the Bidder have a lost time injury rate and a total recordable injury rate of less than or equal to the national average for North American Industrial Classification System ("NAICS") Category 23 for each of the past five (5) years? Provide the Bidder's OSHA 300 and 300A logs for the past five (5) years in a separate attachment. 0 Yes o No 6 Does the Bidder have an experience modifier rate of 1.0 or less? Provide the Bidder's NCCI workers' compensation experience rating sheets for the past five (5) years in a separate attachment. V Yes o No 7 Has the Bidder had any OSHA inspections within the past six (6) months? Provide documentation showing the nature of the inspection, the findings, and the magnitude of the issues in a separate attachment if yes. o Yes Vo Statement of Experience 00 45 16 -12 Cefe Valenzuela Landfill — Gas Collection and Control System, Project No. E16289 Rev 06-22-2016 Attachment 3 ^...r WORKERS COMPENSATION EXPERIENCE RATING IVCC/ Risk Name: TRI CON WORKS LLC Risk ID: 913167775 Rating Effective Date: 10101/2015 Production Date: 05/11/2015 State: INTERSTATE State Wt Exp Excess Losses Expected Losses Exp Prirn Losses Act Exc Losses Ballast Act Inc Losses Act Prim Losses AL .14 0 0 0 0 30,800 0 0 AR .15 409 602 193 0 29,000 0 0 GA .12 3,524 4,577 1,053 0 37,625 0 0 IL .10 o( 0 0 0 52,350 0 0 KY .15 0 0 0 0 30,200 0 0 LA .11 3,199 3,961 762 0 48,300 0 0 MS .13 340 472 132 0 35,350 0 0 MO .12 23,269 30,616 7,347 0 39,375 0 0 NM .13 0 0 0 0 36,400 0 0 NC .12 01 0 0 0 41,650 0 0 OK .11 1,640 2,130 490 0 46,350 0 0 sc .12 0 0 0 0 43,575 0 0 TN 14 5,626 7,719 2,093 0 31,500 0 0 TX .13 41,829 69,637 27,808 25,646 32,200 55,040 29,394 (A) Wt (B) (C) Exp Excess Losses(D - E) (D) Expected Losses (E) Exp Prim Losses (F) Act Exc Losses (H -I) (G) Ballast (H) Act Inc Losses (I) Act Prim Losses .13 79,836 119,714 39,878 25,646 34,978 55,040 29,394 Pr mary Losses Stabilizing Value Ratable Excess Totals Actual (I) 29,394 C'(1-A)+G 104,435 (A)`(F) 3,334 (J) 137,163 Expected (E) 39,878 C ' (1 - A) + G 104,435 (A) * (C) 10,379 (K) 154,692 ARAP FLARAP SARAP MAARAP Exp Mod Factors 1.00 (J) / (K) .89 THE ARAP FACTOR SHOWN IS FOR THOSE STATES CONTAINED ON THIS RATING THAT HAVE APPROVED THE ARAP PROGRAM AND IS CALCULATED BASED ON THE STATE WITH THE HIGHEST APPROVED MAXIMUM ARAP SURCHARGE. THE MAXIMUM ARAP SURCHARGE MAY VARY BY STATE. PLEASE REFER TO EACH STATE'S APPROVED RULES FOR THE APPLICABLE MAXIMUM ARAP SURCHARGE. THE TENNESSEE CODE ANNOTATED SECTION 50-6-501 REQUIRES EVERY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE EMPLOYER THAT IS SUBJECT TO THE WORKERS COMPENSATION STATUTE TO "ESTABLISH AND ADMINISTER A SAFETY COMMITTEE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULES ADOPTED PURSUANT TO T.C.A. SECTION 50-6-502 IF THE EMPLOYER HAS AN EXPERIENCE MODIFICATION RATE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 1.2." Cr Copyright 1993.2015, M rights reserved. This product is comprised of compilations and information which are the proprietary and exclusive property of the National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. (NCCI). No further use, dissemination, sale, transfer, assignment or disposition of this product, in whole or In part, may be made without the prior written consent of NCCI. This product is furnished 'As is -'As available' With all defects and includes information available at the time of publication only. NCCI makes no repmsentations or warranties of any kind relating to the product and hereby expressly disclaims any and all express, statutory, or implied warranties. including the implied warranty of merchantability. fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, completeness, currentness, or correctness of any information or product furnished hereunder. All responsibility for the use of and for any and all results derived or obtained through the use of the product are the end user's and NCCI shall not have any liability thereto. Page 1 of 10 Attachment 3 WORKERS COMPENSATION EXPERIENCE RATING NCC/. Risk Name: TRI CON WORKS LLC Risk ID: 913167775 Rating Effective Date: 10/01/2014 Production Date: 09/03/2014 State: INTERSTATE State Wt Exp Excess Losses Expected Losses Exp Prim Losses Act Exc Losses Ballast Act Inc Losses Act Prim Losses AL .15 0 0 0 0 33,800 0 0 Aft .16 1,310 1,893 583 0 31,500 0 0 l .13 2,18 2,771 582 0 37,275 0 0 IL .11 3,8921 4,526 634 0 54,300 0 0 KY .15 491 673 182 0 30,200 0 - 0 LA .11 3,184 3,883 699 0 45,000 0 0 MS .14 01 0 0 0 34,475 0 0 MO .13 18,852 23,274 4,422 0 38,325 0 0 NM .13 0 0 0 0 35,350 0 0 NC .12 0 0 0 0 40,775 0 0 OK .11 0 0 0 0 46,200 0 0 sc .12 0 0 0 0 43,575 0 0 rN 14 14,533 19,158 4,625 0 36,800 0 0 TX .22 57,917 73,550 15,633 36,146 18,463 41,146 5,000 (A) Wt (B) (C) Exp Excess Losses (D - E) (D) Expected Losses (E) Exp Prim Losses (F) Act Exc Losses (H - I) (6) Ballast (H) Act Inc Losses (I) Act Prim Losses .18 102,368 129,728 27,360 36,146 27,432 41,146 5,000 Primary Losses Stabilizing Value Ratable Excess Totals Actual (I) 5,000 C * (1 -A) + G 111,374 (A)' (F) 6,506 (J) 122,880 Expected (E) 27,360 C'(1 -A)+G 111,374 (A)*(C) 18,426 (K) 157,160 ARAP FLARAP SARAP MAARAP Exp Mod Factors 1.00 (J)/(K) .78 REVISED RATING THE ARAP FACTOR SHOWN IS FOR THOSE STATES CONTAINED ON THIS RATING THAT HAVE APPROVED THE ARAP PROGRAM AND IS CALCULATED BASED ON THE STATE WITH THE HIGHEST APPROVED MAXIMUM ARAP SURCHARGE. THE MAXIMUM ARAP SURCHARGE MAY VARY BY STATE. PLEASE REFER TO EACH STATE'S APPROVED RULES FOR THE APPLICABLE MAXIMUM ARAP SURCHARGE. THE TENNESSEE CODE ANNOTATED SECTION 50-6-501 REQUIRES EVERY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE EMPLOYER THAT IS SUBJECT TO THE WORKERS COMPENSATION STATUTE TO "ESTABLISH AND ADMINISTER A SAFETY COMMITTEE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULES ADOPTED PURSUANT TO T.C.A. SECTION 50-6-502 IF THE EMPLOYER HAS AN EXPERIENCE MODIFICATION RATE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 1.2." RATING REVISED TO REFLECT APPROVED RATING VALUES fi5 Copyright 1993-2015, All rights reserved This product Is comprised of compilations and information which are the proprietary and exdusive property of the National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. (NCCI). No further use, dissemination, sale, transfer, assignment or disposition of this product, in whole or in part, may be made without the prior written consent of NCCI. This product is furnished 'As is' As available"With all defects' and includes information available at the time of publication only. NCCI makes no representations or warranties of any kind relating to the product and hereby expressly disclaims any and all express, statutory. or implied warranties, including the implied warranty of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, completeness, currentness, or correctness of any information or product furnished hereunder. All responsibility for the use of and for any and all results derived or obtained Through the use of the productare the end user's and NCCI shall not have any liability thereto. Page 1 of 12 Attachment 3 WORKERS COMPENSATION EXPERIENCE RATING NEC! Risk Name: TRI CON WORKS LP Risk ID: 913167775 Rating Effective Date: 10/01/2013 Production Date: 09/02/2013 State: INTERSTATE State Wt SRP Exp Excess Losses Expected Losses Exp Prim Losses Act Exc Losses Ballast Act Inc Losses Act Prim Losses AL .14 2060 0 0 0 0 33,000 0 0 AR .161680 1,601 2,157 556 0 26,800 0 0 GA .13 2655 4,431 5,340 909 0 37,100 0 0 IL .10 4395 3,805 4,276 471 0 52,800 0 0 KY .151885 543 705 162 0 30,200 0 0 LA .113700 1,555 1,808 253 0 44,400 0 0 MS .13 2430 0 0 0 0 33,950 0 0 MO .13 2635 5,853 6,967 1,114 0 36,925 0 0 OK .11 3620 0 0 0 0 43,500 0 0 sc .12 3060 0 0 0 0 42,875 0 0 TN .14 2255 19,287 23,847 4,560 0 31,500 0 0 Tx .221070 59,509 75,564 16,055 0 17,963 0 0 (A) Wt (B) (C) Exp Excess Losses (0 - E) (D) Expected Losses (E) Losses Exp Prim (F) Act Exc Losses (H - I) (G) Ballast (H) Act Inc Losses (I) Act Prim Losses .19 96,584 120,664 24,080 0 24,440 0 0 Pr mary Losses Stabilizing Value Ratable Excess Totals Actual (1) 0 C' (1 -A)+G 102,673 (A)•(F) 0 (J) 102,673 Expected (E) 24,080 C(1 - A) + G 102,673 (A) * (C) 18,351 (K) 145,104 ARAP FLARAP SARAP MAARAP Exp Mod Factors 1.00 (J)! (K) .71 *`*` REVISED RATING * THE TENNESSEE CODE ANNOTATED §50-6-501 REQUIRES EVERY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE EMPLOYER THAT IS SUBJECT TO THE WORKERS COMPENSATION STATUTE TO "ESTABLISH AND ADMINISTER A SAFETY COMMITTEE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULES ADOPTED PURSUANT TO T.C.A. §50-6-502 IF THE EMPLOYER HAS AN EXPERIENCE MODIFICATION RATE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 1.2." THE ARAP FACTOR SHOWN IS FOR THOSE STATES CONTAINED ON THIS RATING THAT HAVE APPROVED THE ARAP PROGRAM AND IS CALCULATED BASED ON THE STATE WITH THE HIGHEST APPROVED MAXIMUM ARAP SURCHARGE. THE MAXIMUM ARAP SURCHARGE MAY VARY BY STATE, PLEASE REFER TO EACH STATES APPROVED RULES FOR THE APPLICABLE MAXIMUM ARAP SURCHARGE. RATING REVISED TO REFLECT APPROVED RATING VALUES Copyright 1993-2013, All rights reserved. Thts experience modification factor rs comprised of compilations and information which are the proprietary and exc usivo property of the National Council on Compensation Insurance. Inc (NCCS). No further use. dissemination, sale, transfer, assignment or disposition of this experience rating modification factor or any part thereof may be used without the written consent of NCCI. NCCI makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, as to any matter whatsoever including but not limited to the accuracy of any information, product or service furnished hereunder and, as to NCCI, recipient of this expenence rating modification factor subscribes to and utilizes the information service 'as is'. Page 1 of 11 Attachment 3 WORKERS COMPENSATION EXPERIENCE RATING CORisk Name: TRI CON WORKS LP Risk ID: 913167775 Rating Effective Date: 10101/2012 Production Date: 05/25/2012 State: INTERSTATE State Wt SRP Exp Excess Losses Expected Losses Exp Prim Losses Act Exc Losses Ballast Act Inc Losses Act Prim Losses AL .151935 0 0 0 0 31,000 0 0 AR .161620 1,351 1,609 258 0 29,250 0 0 GA .10 2580 7,871 9,049 1,178 0 36,050 0 0 iL .114120 4,0881 4,396 308 0 49,500 0 0 .KY .161720 451 525 74 0 27,600 0 0 LA .08 3475 1,584 1,760 176 0 41,700 0 0 Ms .14 22270 0 0 0 0 31,850 0 0 Mo .13 2495 939 1,067 128 0 35,000 0 0 OK .12 3230 0 0 0 0 45,150 0 0 TN .14 2180 14,764 16,605 1,841 0 34,800 0 0 Tx .221070 67,978 87,485 19,507 0 17,963 0 0 (A) Wt (B) (C) Exp Excess Losses (D - E) (D) Expected Losses (E) Losses Exp Prim (F) Act Exc Losses (H - I) (G) Ballast (H) Act Inc Losses (1) Act Prim Losses .19 99,026 122,496 23,470 0 23,392 0 0 Primary Losses Stabilizing Value Ratable Excess Totals Actual (I) 0 C*(1-A)+G 103,603 (A)'(F) 0 (J) 103,603 Expected (E) 23,470 C ' (1 - A) + G 103,603 (A)* (C) 18,815 (K) 145,888 ARAP FLARAP SARAP MAARAP Exp Mod Factors 1.00 (3)1 (K) .71 'NOTICE - THIS ISA PRELIMINARY MODIFICATION' COMPLETE PAYROLL AND LOSS DATA HAVE BEEN APPLIED TO CURRENT RATING VALUES BUT A FINAL MODIFICATION CANNOT BE PROMULGATED UNTIL PENDING RATE FILING HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR THE STATES IDENTIFIED WITH AN ' ABOVE. THE ARAP FACTOR SHOWN IS FOR THOSE STATES CONTAINED ON THIS RATING THAT HAVE APPROVED THE ARAP PROGRAM AND IS CALCULATED BASED ON THE STATE WITH THE HIGHEST APPROVED MAXIMUM ARAP SURCHARGE. THE MAXIMUM ARAP SURCHARGE MAY VARY BY STATE. PLEASE REFER TO EACH STATES APPROVED RULES FOR THE APPLICABLE MAXIMUM ARAP SURCHARGE. Copyright 1993-2012, NI rights reserved. This experience modification factor is comprised of compilations and information which are the proprietary and exclusive property of the National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. (NCCI). No further use, dissemination, sale, transfer, assignment or disposition of this experience rating modification factor or any part thereof may be used without the written consent of NCCI. NCCI makes no representation or warranty, expressed or Implied, as to any matter whatsoever including but not limited 10 the accuracy of any Information, product or service furnished hereunder and, as to NCCI, recipient of this experience rating modification factor subscribes to and utilizes the information service 'as Is'. Page 1 of 10 Attachment 3 _ — Copyright t993-2011, All rights reserved. This experience modilicatton factor is comprised of compilations and +nformat+on which are the propnotary and exclusive property of the National Council on Compensation Insurance Int (NCCI) No further use, d,ssem+r}at+en, sale transfer, assignment or disposition of this experience rating modification factor or any pan thereof may be used without the wratere consent Of NCCI NCCI makes no representation or warranty. expressed Or Implied 3510 any matter whatsoever including but not limited to rhe accuracy of any informatson. product or service furrtished her€under and. as to NCCI. recipient of this experience raung modification factor su0sCr Des to and utilizes the mfonmation service as is - Page 1 of 5 r4'1 ! 4 WORKERS COMPENSATION EXPERIENCE RATING Risk Name: TRI CON WORKS LP Risk ID: 913167775 Rating Effective Date: 10/01/2011 Production Date: 08/23/2011 State: INTERSTATE _ State Wt SRP Exp Excess Losses Expected Losses Exp Prim Losses Act Exc Losses Ballast Act Inc Losses Act Prim Losses 0 At. .121755 0 0 0 (A)* (C) 0 24,500 0 59,069 0 GA .082385 6.406 7,627 1,221 SARAP 0 28,650 0 0 KY .121590 0 0 1.00 0 22.225 0 THE ARAP FACTOR SHOWN IS FOR THOSE STATES CONTAINED ON THIS 0 LA I .07 3255 OI 0 0 0 32.500 0 0 Ms .112185 0 0 0 0 26,250 0 0 TN .112035 1,324 1,492 168 0 24,450 0 0 TX .151070 43,9661 56,708 12,742 0 12,463 0 0 (A) Wt (B) (C) Exp Excess Losses (D - E) (D) Expected Losses (E) Exp Prim Losses (F) Act Exc Losses (H - I} (G) Ballast (H) Act Inc Losses (I) Act Prim Losses 141 51.696 65,827. 14.131 0 14,610 0 0 Copyright t993-2011, All rights reserved. This experience modilicatton factor is comprised of compilations and +nformat+on which are the propnotary and exclusive property of the National Council on Compensation Insurance Int (NCCI) No further use, d,ssem+r}at+en, sale transfer, assignment or disposition of this experience rating modification factor or any pan thereof may be used without the wratere consent Of NCCI NCCI makes no representation or warranty. expressed Or Implied 3510 any matter whatsoever including but not limited to rhe accuracy of any informatson. product or service furrtished her€under and. as to NCCI. recipient of this experience raung modification factor su0sCr Des to and utilizes the mfonmation service as is - Page 1 of 5 Pnmary Losses Stabilizing Value Ratable Excess Totals (1) C ' (1 - A) + G (A)* (F) (J) Actual 0 59,069 0 59,069 (E) C * (1 - A) + G (A)* (C) (K) Expected 14,131 59,069 7,237 80,437 ARAP FLARAP SARAP MAARAP Exp Mod (J) / (K) Factors 1.00 .73 THE ARAP FACTOR SHOWN IS FOR THOSE STATES CONTAINED ON THIS RATING THAT HAVE APPROVED THE ARAP PROGRAM AND IS CALCULATED BASED ON THE STATE WITH THE HIGHEST APPROVED MAXIMUM ARAP SURCHARGE. THE MAXIMUM ARAP SURCHARGE MAY VARY BY STATE. PLEASE REFER TO EACH STATES APPROVED RULES FOR THE APPLICABLE MAXIMUM ARAP SURCHARGE. Copyright t993-2011, All rights reserved. This experience modilicatton factor is comprised of compilations and +nformat+on which are the propnotary and exclusive property of the National Council on Compensation Insurance Int (NCCI) No further use, d,ssem+r}at+en, sale transfer, assignment or disposition of this experience rating modification factor or any pan thereof may be used without the wratere consent Of NCCI NCCI makes no representation or warranty. expressed Or Implied 3510 any matter whatsoever including but not limited to rhe accuracy of any informatson. product or service furrtished her€under and. as to NCCI. recipient of this experience raung modification factor su0sCr Des to and utilizes the mfonmation service as is - Page 1 of 5 Attachment 3 Table 5 — Demonstrated Minority, MBE, DBE Participation Organization doing business as Project Subcontractors and Suppliers Tr(' Co,' Works , I- t C Provide a list of anticipated Minority, MBE, DBE Subcontractors or Suppliers contracts that will be used to demonstrate compliance with the Owner's Minority / MBE / DBE Participation Policy Name Work to be Provided Estimated % of Contract Price b Texas Icon Cons -bud -ion, LLC. Stedti18.10.t1tk1 Fer4i(Ci& .01 - Statement of Experience Cefe Valenzuela Landfill — Gas Collection and Control System, Project No. E16289 00 45 16-13 Rev 06-22-2016 Attachment 3 ARTICLE 5 — CERTIFICATION 5.01 By submitting this Statement of Experience and related information, Bidder certifies that it has read this Statement of Experience and that Bidder's responses are true and correct and contain no material misrepresentations and that the individual signing below is authorized to make this certification on behalf of the Bidder's organization. The individual signing this certification shall attach evidence of individual's authority to bind the organization to an agreement. Bidder: By: Name: Title: Ti: -l* eon Works, LI -C. (typed or printed) (individual's signature) 5(5 /441321& (typed or printed) %0 -Pre s(dent Designated Representative: Name: Title: Address: (typed or printed) ,g, e k/1/1/ /D167 -w.5 %o-7P/t‘-a�T Oil /Iv nvDe hor vAl'/7X 7,0/5 Telephone No.: 78-p.29 7/9•Email: END OF SECTION Statement of Experience Cefe Valenzuela Landfill — Gas Collection and Control System, Project No. E16289 00 45 16-14 Rev 06-22-2016 Attachment 3 C. Submit PDF documents with adequate resolution to allow documents to be printed in a format equivalent to the original documents. Documents are to be scalable to allow printing on standard 8-1/2 x 11 or 11 x 17 paper. D. Submit color PDF documents if color is used in the printed version of the documents. Statement of Experience Cefe Valenzuela Landfill — Gas Collection and Control System, Project No. E16289 004516-4 Rev 06-22-2016 -711611i7iANir►ii 11‘1\1TRI CO /WORKS LLNC To whom it may concern: Attachment 3 On April 1, 2014, Tri Con Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, purchased 100% of the equity interests of Tri Con Works, LLC {formerly Tri Con Works, L.P.} from Ex - Blue. L.P., Coyote Enterprises LP, and Mars Diversified, LLC (the "Transaction"). In order to effect the Transaction, on March 28, 2014, Tri Con Works, L.P. converted into Tri Con Works, LLC, pursuant to the certificates of conversion and formation attached hereto as Exhibit A. As a result of the Transaction. Tri Con Holdings. Inc. became the sole member of Tri Con Works, LLC. Pursuant to resolutions adopted by Tri Con Holdings, Inc. in its individual capacity (attached as Exhibit B) and as the sole member of Tri Con Works, LLC (attached as Exhibit C), the officers of Tri Con Holdings, Inc. and Tri Con Works, LLC are as follows: Officers of Tri Con Holdings, Inc. Bryan Robbins Co -President Gary Smith Co -President and Secretary Kyun Park Vice President Sarah Smith Controller and Treasurer Officers of Tri Con Works, LLC Bryan Robbins Co -President Gary Smith Co -President and Secretary Sarah Smith Controller and Treasurer As evidenced by the resolutions adopted by Tri Con Holdings, Inc., the sole - member of Tri Con Works, LLC, and attached hereto as Exhibit D, Bryan Robbins is Co- president of Tri Con Works, LLC, effective April 1, 2014. Therefore, Mr. Robbins is an officer duly authorized to sign the Public Work Bid Form by Tri Con Works, LLC. IFAMAIAIWAPAIARNIAlifif 1211 Hollywood Street, Houston, Texas 77015 • Phone: (713) 453-8654 • Fax: (713) 330-9240 WWW.triconwor s.com Attachment 3 TRI CON WORKS LLC WORKS LLC If you have any questions regarding the efficacy of the Transaction, the resolutions adopted in connection therewith or Mr. Robbins' status as a duly authorized officer of Tri Con Works, LLC. please feel free to contact our attorney, Andrew Harris of Winston & Strawn LLP, at (212) 294-6779 or asharrislwinston.corn. www.triconwor s.com Sincerely, fearirAtivirAMFAKIVAI 1211 Hollywood Street, Houston, Texas 77015 • Phone: (713) 453-8654 • Fax: (713) 330-9240 Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.277 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-149165 Date Filed: 12/28/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Tri Con Works, LLC Houston, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E16289 Gas Collection and Control System 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check if is NO Interested Party. only there X 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. � /� A` SARAH H SMITH My Commission Expires ���I March 9. 2019 .,,4- e of authorized agent of contracting business entity 7' ..,,,:t.: 9 9 tY P,, (,, I� 1/; NJ iO O(.ft s , this the 34 day of k!W AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE /� Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said trL t1 20 rl , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of officAs. , Swtt• TFTre a sures •//II /'t , 1it4 Sant h 11• %Ali =ignature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.277 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2017-149860 Date Filed: 01/03/2017 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. SCS Engineers Bedford, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. 16289 Cefe Valenzuela Landfill, Gas Collection and Control System (GCCS) Construction -Phase Engineering and Quality Assurance (CQA) Services 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 15 Check onlyif there is NO Interested Party. I X I 6 AFFIDAVIT ft I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. i �a+'"'"",••, KATHLENE EWING Public, State of Texas f Notary �, L4.:1 Comm. Expires 06-07-2017 •;;,°, ' Notary ID 129449747 _ -� Sign re of authorized ag of contracti business entity g AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE I�/�_".'v J Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said KeA/ 10 1 Ad , this the day of J V -. 20 i1 , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. I/9/0? / �<u-W1lant Evvivi Prow -dr Mminl skraf Pr miriiiref is .r adminust- oath Printed name of officer ndindnistering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.277 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of January 31, 2017 DATE: January 16, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager markvv@cctexas.com (361) 826-3897 Valerie H. Gray, P. E., Executive Director of Public Works valerieg@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: J. H. Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 CAPTION: Engineering Construction Contract Gollihar Road Improvements Kostoryz Road to Weber Road Bond 2014 Proposition 1 Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Haas -Anderson Construction, Ltd. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $13,534,848.30 for Gollihar Road Improvements from Kostoryz Road to Weber Road for a total base bid and to execute a construction materials testing agreement with Rock Engineering in the amount of $63,725.00 for Gollihar Road from Weber to Carroll Lane and to execute a construction materials testing agreement with Rock Engineering in the amount of $59,359.00 for Gollihar Road from Carroll to Kostoryz. BOND 2014 Proposition 1 PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is to obtain authority to execute a construction contract and for two construction materials agreements for Gollihar Road from Kostoryz to Weber Project. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: This project consists of two Bond 2014 projects: Gollihar Road (from Weber to Carroll) and Gollihar Road (from Carroll to Kostoryz). Bond 2014 Brochure description: "Gollihar Road from Weber Road to Carroll Lane — This project includes full -depth repair of the existing five lane roadway with four travel lanes and continuous center left turn lane which is consistent with A-1 Arterial designation in the Urban Transportation Plan. Other improvements include curb and gutter, sidewalks, ADA ramps, and pavement markings and traffic signal improvements at Carroll Lane and Gollihar intersection. During detailed design, consideration will be given to widen the sidewalks to create multiuse pedestrian/bike paths for safe bike routes and also to addition of bike lanes. During detailed design consideration will also be given to implementation of the road diet concept and reducing the five lane road to a three lane road." Bond 2014 Brochure description: "Gollihar Road from Carroll Lane to Kostoryz Road — This project includes full -depth repair of the existing five lane roadway with four travel lanes and continuous center left turn lane which is consistent with the A-1 Arterial designation in the Urban Transportation Plan. Other improvements include curb and gutter, sidewalks, ADA curb ramps, and pavement markings and traffic signal improvements at Carroll Lane and Gollihar intersection. During detailed design, consideration will be given to widen the sidewalks to create multiuse pedestrian/bike paths for safe bike routes and also to addition of bike lanes. During detailed design consideration will also be given to implementation of the road diet concept and reducing the five lane road to a three lane road." Project Description: This project includes full -depth reconstruction of the existing 5 -lane Hot -Mix Asphalt Concrete (HMAC) road with four travel lanes and a continuous center turn lane. Improvements include new concrete bus stops, curb & gutter, sidewalks, ADA ramps, cycle tracks, pavement markings, and traffic signal upgrade at the Gollihar/Carroll intersection. Utility improvements include storm water, wastewater, water and gas. On December 21, 2016, the City received proposals from three (3) bidders and the bids are as follows: Contractor Base Bid Haas -Anderson Construction, Ltd. Corpus Christi, Texas $13,534,848.30 Bay, Ltd. Corpus Christi, Texas $14,968,474.39 Clark Pipeline Services Corpus Christi, Texas $15,297,859.09 Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost $12,188,006.71 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize execution of a construction contract. (Recommended) 2. Do not authorize execution of a construction contract. (Not Recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: LJA, Inc. (LJA) is the design engineer that was selected for this project under RFQ 2013-01. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Complies with statutory requirements for construction contracts. Conforms to FY 2016-2017 Street Capital Improvement Planning (CIP) Budget. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Street Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue X Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Project to Date Budget and Expenditures Current Year Future Years TOTALS Budget $2,059,611.00 $15,586,926.00 $17,646,537.00 Encumbered / Expended Amount 2,059,611.00 0.00 2,059,611 This item 13,657,932.30 $13,657,932.30 Future Anticipated Expenditures This Project 1,917,276.83 1,917,276.83 BALANCE $0 $11,716.87 $11,716.87 Fund(s): Comments: N/A RECOMMENDATION: City staff and LJA recommend the construction contract be awarded to Haas -Anderson Construction, Ltd. in the amount of $13,534,848.30 and two construction materials testing agreements with Rock Engineering for $63,725.00 and $59,359.00 for the Gollihar Road Improvements from Kostoryz to Weber the total base bid. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Project Budget Location Map Testing Agreements (2) Form 1295 (3) Presentation PROJECT BUDGET ESTIMATE Gollihar Road (Weber to Kostoryz) Bond 2014, Proposition 1 PROJECT FUNDS AVAILABLE: Gollihar Road from Carroll Lane to Weber - Bond 2014, Prop 1 3,700,000 Gollihar Road from Kostoryz to Carroll Lane - Bond 2014, Prop 1 3,700,000 Utilities 10,246,537 Water 2,750,000 Wastewater 875,000 Storm Water 6,300,000 Gas 321.537 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 17,646,537 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction: Construction (Haas -Anderson) THIS ITEM 13,534,848 Construction - Gollihar from Carroll Lane to Weber Road (#E13088) 7,199,952 Street 2,969,584 Utilities 4,230,368 Water 1,249,818 Storm Water 2,515,987 Wastewater 326,507 Gas 138,056 Construction - Gollihar from Kostoryz Road to Carroll Lane (#13089) 6,334,896 Street 2,426,158 Utilities 3,908,738 Water 1,249,818 Storm Water 2,194,357 Wastewater 326,507 Gas 138,056 Contingency (10%) 1,353,485 Construction Inspection and Testing. Construction Inspection (Estimate) 165,792 Construction Materials Testing (Rock) Weber to Kostoryz 123,084 Construction - Materials Testing (Rock) Weber to Carroll 63,725 Construction - Materials Testing (Rock) Carroll to Kostoryz 59,359 Design: (LJA) Original Contract and two amendments Engineer (LJA) Original Contact 2,009,621 Street 646,899 Utilities 1,362,722 Water 64,782 Storm Water 1,200,768 Wastewater 80,977 Gas 16,195 Amendment No. 1 (No Cost) 0 Amendment No. 2 49,990 Street 49,990 288,876 2,059,611 Reimbursements: Total Reimbursements 398,000 Contract Administration (Engineering Svcs Admin/Finance/Capital Budget) 150,000 Engineering Services (Project Mgt/Constr Mgt) 246,000 Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 2,000 TOTAL 17,634,820 ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE 11,717 00 co �coO PROJECT LOCATION LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE Pr00EEN❑❑ ❑J: El ❑❑❑❑ ❑ El mm Gollihar Road Kostoryz Rd to Weber Rd Bond 2014 CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT for Construction Materials Testing and Engineering Services This AGREEMENT is between the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation ("CITY"), acting through its duly authorized City Manager or designee ("City Engineer"), and ROCK ENGINEERING & TESTING LABORATORY, INC., a Texas corporation or partnership ("LAB"), acting through its duly authorized representative who is Curtis A. Rock, Chief Operatinci Officer, which agree as follows: 1. DECLARATIONS: City desires to engage Lab to provide services in connection with City's project, described as follows: Gollihar Road from Weber Road to Carroll Lane BOND 2014 (Proiect No. E13088) ("PROJECT"). 2. SCOPE OF WORK: Lab shall provide services to the Project in accordance with the accompanying Scope of Services and Fee Schedule attached as Exhibit A and the Terms and Conditions to Agreement attached as Exhibit B. 3. FEE: The City agrees to pay the Lab for services provided in accordance with Exhibit "A", Scope of Services and Fee Schedule under this Agreement, a total fee not to exceed $63,725.00. Monthly invoices will be submitted in accordance with Exhibit C. 4. CITY'S DISCLOSURE OF HAZARDOUS & TOXIC MATERIALS AND CONDITIONS AT THE PROJECT SITE: To the best of the City's knowledge, based upon currently available information, the only hazardous or toxic materials, as defined by the laws and regulations of the Federal government, the state, and city which exist at the PROJECT SITE are as follows: None. 5. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: All documents including contract documents (plans and specifications), record drawings, contractor's field data and submittal data will be the sole property of the City and may not be used again by Lab without the express terms written consent of the City Engineer. However, Lab may use standard details that are not specific to this Project. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI ROCK ENGINEERING & TESTING LABORATORY, INC. J.H. Edmonds, P.E. Date Curtis A. Rock Director of Engineering Services Chief Operating Officer 6817 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, TX 78409 RECOMMENDED (361) 883-4555 Office Operating Department Date APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Assistant City Attorney Date KIENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGEWNGIEMISTREET\E13088 GOLUHAR FROM WEBER TO CARROLL BOND 20141ROCK CMTNS 1215 TESTING AGREEMENT.DOC Date Rev. 12/15/15 APPROVED Office of Management Date and Budget ATTEST Rebecca Huerta Date City Secretary Project No. E13088 Accounting Unit: 3551-051 Account: 550920 Activity: El 3088013551 EXP Account Category: 50920 Fund Name: Street CIP BOND 2014 Encumbrance No. KIENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGEWNGIEMISTREET1E13088 GOLLIHAR FROM WEBER TO CARROLL BOND 20141ROCK CMTI15 1215 TESTING AGREEMENT.DOC Rev. 12115/15 Wednesday, December 21, 2016 City of Corpus Christi 1201 Leopard St Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Attn: Jeffrey Edmonds, P.E. +GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING •CONSTRUCTION MATERJALS ENGINEERING TESTING •SOILS • ASPHALT • CONCRETE SUBJECT: ESTIMATED TESTING BUDGET FOR THE PROPOSED E13088— Gollihar Rd Improvements - Carroll to Weber Corpus Christi, TX RETL Proposal Number: P122016A Dear Jeffrey Edmonds, P.E. Rock Engineering and Testing Laboratory, Inc. (RETL) (TBPE Firm No. 21 01) is pleased to be selected to perform the Construction Materials Testing for the above referenced project. The Construction Materials Testing for the proposed construction project is based upon quantities as derived from the Plans made available to RETL as of the date of this proposal. The estimated testing for thls project is $63,725.00 We understand that we have been chosen to provide these services for this publicly funded project. Therefore, by providing cost information we are not in violation of the Texas Professional Services Procurement Act. The estimated construction materials testing budget is based on a review of the information provided to RETL. An estimated breakdown of field and laboratory testing required is included as an attachment. In order to best respond to the project testing needs and schedules, please schedule testing a minimum of 48 hours in advance in order to defer any potential delays. RETL strives to accomodate all testing requests as they are received and con make accomodations with advanced notice to schedules. Please make note that the actual fees invoiced for this project will be based on the actual testing performed. The total fee assessed will be dependent on the contractor's construction techniques, number of trips made to the jobsite, elapsed time from technician arrival to commencement of testing activities, and any time the technician is required to be on-site but not performing testing activities. Please be advised that Weekend/Holiday/Overtime Laboratory and Field Testing will be billed at an addtional $38.00 RETL appreciates your consideration of our firm to assist you during the construction phase of your project. If you agree with this proposal, please sign the attached Laboratory Testing Services Agreement, submit the Distribution List and provide billing information. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (361) 883-4555 extension 415 it you have any questions regarding the proposal or would like to discuss further. Sincerely, Pablo Schmitt Estimator Rock Engineering and Testing ROCK ENGINEERING TESTING LABORATORY, INC 6817 LEOPARO STREET • CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, 78409 OFFICE: (3611883-4555 • FAX: (3611883-4711 • tiwvw.racktesting.com Wednesday, December 21, 2016 Page 1 of 7 IEXHIBIT "A" I Page 1 of 7 P122016A E13088 — Gollihar Rd Improvements - Carroll to Weber City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, TX Jeffrey Edmonds, P.E. 01. LABORATORY G. PERSONNEL Admin Fee I.S - Lump Sum P119 ADMINISTRATION FEE (1 time per project) LIFTS/MIN QTYFREQ QTY RATE AMOUNT 1 1 1 Is $79.00 $79.00 01. LABORATORY SUBTOTAL $79.00 Wednesday, December 21, 2016 Page 2 of 7 EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 7 IEXHIBIT "A" I Page 3 of 7 P122016A E13088—Gollihar Rd Improvements - Carroll to Weber City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, TX Jeffrey Edmonds, P.E. 02. SOILS LIFTS/MIN QTYFREQ QTY RATE AMOUNT AL SUBGRADE Densities Asphalt Street LF -1 per 100 LF of each lane/iHt 5600-1 NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY (ASTM D6938) V486 VEHICLE Densities Curb & Gutter LF-1per 500LF 5600-1 NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY (ASTM D6938) V486 VEHICLE Densities Driveways EA -1 every 2 5600.1 NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY (ASTM D6938) V486 VEHICLE Densities Sidewalks LF -1 perS000LF 5600-1 NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY (ASTM D6938) V486 VEHICLE Raw Subgrade EA -1 each material type 5190 MATERIALS SAMPUNG CHARGE 5510 PROCTOR -STANDARD ASTM D698 V486 VEHICLE AS. SACKFUL Densities Trench Backfill LF -1 per 200 LF of each cane/lift 5600-1 NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY (ASTM 06938) V486 VEHICLE Trench Backfll EA -1 each material type 5190 MATERIALS SAMPLING CHARGE 5510 PROCTOR - STANDARD ASTM D698 V486 VEHICLE Wednesday, December2l, 2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 130 130 ea 547.00 13 13 trip $48.00 27 27 ea 547.00 5 5 trip 548.00 $6,110.00 5624.00 51,269.00 $240.00 12 12 ea 547.00 5564.00 6 6 trip $48.00 5288.00 8 8 ea $47.00 2 2 trip $48.00 5376.00 596.0o 1 1 1 ea 560.00 560.00 1 I 1 ea 5226.00 5226.00 1 1 1 trip $48.00 548.00 1 1 362 362 ea $47.00 517,014.00 37 37 trip 548.00 51,776.00 1 1 1 ea 560.00 560.00 1 1 1 ea 5226.00 $226.00 1 1 1 trip $48.00 548.00 Page 3 of 7 P122016A E13088 — Gollihar Rd Improvements - Carroll to Weber City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, TX Jeffrey Edmonds, P.E. 02. SOILS SUBTOTAL $29,025.00 03. FLEXIBLE BASE A3. FLEX BASE CY - 1 per 3000 CY LIFTS/MIN QTYFREQ QTY RATE AMOUNT 5502 ATTERBERG LIMITS/PLASTICITY INDEX (with Aggregate) ASTM D4318 1 2 2 ea $99.00 5198.00 5504 GRADATION (Sieve Analysis) 1 2 2 ea $99.00 5198.00 5522 PROCTOR -MODIFIED ASTM 01557 1 2 2 ea $266.00 5532.00 5548 LA ABRASION (ASTM C131) 1 2 Zea $337.00 5674.00 V486 VEHICLE 1 2 2 trip $48.00 596.00 EA -1 each material type 5546 WET BALL MILL 1 1 1 ea 5337.00 5337.00 5606 TRIAXIAL 1 1 1 ea 5780.00 5780.00 5610 CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO (ASTM D1883) 1 1 1 ea 5515.00 5515.00 Densities Compacted Base LF -1 per 100 LF of each lane/lift 5600-1 NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY (ASTM 06938) V486 VEHICLE Densities Compacted Base Curb & Gutter LF-1per 200LF 5600-1 NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY (ASTM 06938) V486 VEHICLE Wednesday, December 21, 2016 1 1 1 1 260 260 ea 547.00 512,220.00 26 26 trip 548.00 $1,248.00 27 27 ea $47.00 4 4 trip 548,00 51,269.00 $192.00 03. FLEXIBLE BASE SUBTOTAL $18,259.00 Page 4 of 7 EXHIBIT "A" Page 4of7 P122016A E13088 — Gollihar Rd Improvements - Carroll to Weber City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, TX Jeffrey Edmonds, P.E. 04, HOT MIX ASPHALT CONCRETE B. ASPHALT FuII Sides T -1 per 500 tons A105 ASPHALT FULL SERIES 5151 SAMPLE PREPARATION CHARGE In Place Cares LF -1 per 1000 LF of street A202 ASPHALT CORING/THICKNESS/DENSITY V486 VEHICLE Wednesday, December 21, 2016 LIFTS/MIN QTYFREQ QTY RATE AMOUNT 1 1 1 1 10 10 ea $667.00 $6,670.00 10 10 hr $72.00 $720.00 3 3 ea $104.00 $312.00 1 1 trip $48.00 $4800 04. HOT MIX ASPHALT CONCRETE SUBTOTAL $7,7so.00 Page 5 of 7 EXHIBIT "A" Page 5 of 7 P122016A E13088 - Gollihar Rd Improvements - Carroll to Weber City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, TX Jeffrey Edmonds, P.E. OS. CONCRETE CYLINDERS C1. CONCRETE Curb and Gutter 107,3.28 LF-1per 500LF LIFTS/MIN QTYFREQ QTY RATE AMOUNT C301-1 CONCRETE CYUNDERS (Min 4) 4 11 44 ea 547.00 52,068.00 5399 CONCRETE CYLINDERS PICK UP FEE 1 6 6 pour 546.00 5276.00 V486 VEHICLE 1 7 7trip 548.00 5336.00 Curb Post & Grate Inlets 107,3628 EA -1 set every 6 each C301.1 CONCRETE CYLINDERS (Min 4) 5399 CONCRETE CYLINDERS PICKUP FEE V486 VEHICLE Driveways 1@7,3gp28 SF-1set every 2500SF 4 1 1 4 16 ea 547.00 5752.00 2 2 pour 546.00 592.00 3 3 trip 548.00 5144.00 C301-1 CONCRETE CYLINDERS (Min 4) 4 4 16 ea $47,00 5752.00 5399 CONCRETE CYLINDERS PICK UP FEE 1 2 2 pour 546.00 $92.00 V486 VEHICLE 1 6 6 trip $48.00 6288.00 Manhole Base/Footing 107,3.W28 EA-1set every 10each C301-1 CONCRETE CYLINDERS (Min 4) 4 3 12 ea 547.00 $564.00 5399 CONCRETE CYUNDERS PICK UP FEE 1 2 2 pour 546.00 592.00 V486 VEHICLE 1 5 5 trip $48.00 5240.00 Sidewalk 107,3028 SF - I set every 4000 SF 0301-1. CONCRETE CYLINDERS (Min 4) 5399 CONCRETE CYLINDERS PICK UP FEE V486 VEHICLE Wingwalis 107,3028 EA -1 per each 4 11 44 ea $47.00 52,068.00 1 5 5 pour 546.00 5230.00 1 6 6 trip 548.00 5288.00 C301-1 CONCRETE CYUNDERS (Min 4) 4 1 4 ea $47.00 5188.00 5399 CONCRETE CYLINDERS PICK UP FEE 1 1 1 pour 546.00 546.00 V486 VEHICLE 1 2 2 trip 548.00 596.00 Wednesday, December 21, 2016 05. CONCRETE CYLINDERS SUBTOTAL $8,612.00 Page 6 of 7 IEXHIBIT "A" Page 6 of 7 GRAND TOTAL $63,725.00 Special Inspection such as REBAR INSPECTION are not Included In this proposal. Please contact us for a quote for these items If needed. Wednesday, December 21, 2016 Page 7 of 7 IEXHIBIT "A" Page 7 of 7 TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO TESTING AGREEMENT ARTICLE 1. SERVICES: Lab will: 1.1 Provide only those services requested by City Engineer that, in the opinion of Lab, lie within the technical or professional areas of expertise of Lab and which Lab is adequately staffed and equipped to perform. 1.2 Perform technical services under the supervision of a licensed professional engineer and in compliance with the basic requirements of the appropriate standards of the American Society for Testing and Materials, where applicable, and other standards designated in writing by the City Engineer. 1.3 Promptly submit formal reports (printed and electronic copies) of tests, inspections and services performed indicating, where applicable, compliance with the Project specifications or other contract documents. Such reports must be complete and factual, citing the tests performed, methods employed, values obtained and parts of the structure of the Project area subjected to any testing. 1.4 Utilize testing equipment which has been calibrated according to applicable standards and, upon request, submit to the City Engineer or designee documentation of such calibration. Secure representative samples of those materials that the City's contractor proposes to use which require testing, together with relevant data concerning such materials including the point of origin and supplier. 1.5 Consider reports to be confidential and distribute reports only to those persons, organizations or agencies specifically designated in writing by the City Engineer. 1.6 Retain records relating to services performed for City for a period of two years following submission of any reports, during which period the records will be made available to the City at all reasonable times. 1.7 Pay salaries, wages, expenses, social security taxes, federal and state unemployment taxes and any other similar payroll taxes relating to the services. ARTICLE 2. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES: City Engineer or designee will: 2.1 Provide Lab with all plans, specifications, addenda, change orders, approved shop drawings and other information for the proper performance of services by Lab. 2.2 Issue authorization in writing giving Lab free access to the Project site and to all shops or yards where materials are prepared or stored. 2.3 Designate in writing those persons or firms which will act as the City's representative with respect to Lab's services to be performed under this Agreement and which must be promptly notified by Lab when it appears that materials tested or inspected are in non-compliance. Only the City Engineer or designee has authority to transmit instructions, receive information and data and/or interpret and define the City's policies and decisions with respect to the Project. Lab acknowledges that certain City representatives may have different types of authority conceming the Project. 2.4 Advise Lab sufficiently in advance of any operations so as to allow for assignment of personnel by Lab for completion of the required services. Such advance notice will be in accordance with that established by mutual agreement of the parties. 2.5 Direct the Project contractor, either by the Construction Contract or direct written order, to: EXHIBIT "B" Page 1 of 6 (a) Stop work at the appropriate times for Lab to perform contracted services; (b) Furnish such labor and all facilities needed by Lab to obtain and handle samples at the Project and to facilitate the specified inspection and tests; (c) Provide and maintain for use of Lab adequate space at the Project for safe storage and proper curing of test specimens that must remain on the Project site prior to, during and up to 60 days after testing. ARTICLE 3. GENERAL CONDITIONS 3.1 Lab, by the performance of services covered hereunder, does not in any way assume, abridge or abrogate any of those duties, responsibilities or authorities with regard to the Project that, by custom or contract, are vested in the Project architects, design engineers or any other design agencies or authorities. 3.2 Lab is not authorized to supervise, alter, relax, enlarge or release any requirement of the Project specifications or other contract documents nor to approve or accept any portion of the work. Lab does not have the right of rejection or the right to stop the work. City Engineer will direct the Project contractor to stop work at appropriate times for Lab to conduct the sampling, testing or inspection of operations covered by the Agreement. ARTICLE 4. FIELD MONITORING AND TESTING 4.1 City and Lab agree that Lab will be on-site to perform inspections for contracted services. The City and Lab also agree that Lab will not assume responsibility for Project contractors means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction, and it is understood that the final services provided by Lab will not relieve the Project contractor of its responsibilities for performing the work in accordance with the Project plans and specifications. For the purposes of this Agreement, the word "inspection" is used to mean periodic observation of the work and the conducting of tests by Lab as specified in the Agreement. Continuous monitoring by Lab or its subcontractors does not mean that Lab is approving placement of materials. Inspection is not and should not be construed to be a warranty by Lab to the City or any other party. 4.2 Samples collected or tested by Lab remain the property of the City while in the custody of the Lab. Lab will retain the samples for a period of 60 days following the date of submission of any report related to the sample. Following the retention period, Lab will dispose of non -hazardous samples, and retum hazardous, acutely toxic or radioactive samples and samples' containers and residues to City. City agrees to accept such samples and samples' containers. ARTICLE 5. STANDARD OF CARE AND WARRANTY Services performed by Lab will be conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the same locality. No other warranty either expressed or implied is made or intended by the Agreement or any reports. Lab will not be responsible for the interpretation or use by others of data developed by Lab. ARTICLE 6. INDEMNIFICATION Lab shall fully indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi and its officials, officers, agents, employees, or other entity, excluding the engineer or architect or that person's agent, employee or subconsultant, over which the City exercises control ("Indemnitee") from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, to the extent that the damage is caused by or results from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property infringement or failure to pay a EXHIBIT "B" Page 2 of 6 subcontractor or supplier committed by Lab or its agent, Lab under contract or another entity over which Lab exercises control while in the exercise of rights or performance of the duties under this agreement. This indemnification does not apply to any liability resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the City or its employees, to the extent of such negligence. Lab shall defend Indemnitee, with counsel satisfactory to the City Attorney, from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, if the claim is not based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee. If a claim is based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee, the Lab shall reimburse the City's reasonable attorney's fees in proportion to the Lab's liability. Lab must advise City in writing within 24 hours of any claim or demand against City or Lab known to Lab related to or arising out of Lab's activities under this Agreement. ARTICLE 7. INVOICES AND PAYMENT 7.1 Lab will submit progress invoices to City Engineer monthly and final invoice upon completion of services. Each invoice is due and payable by City within 30 days of receipt and approval to pay by the City Engineer. 7.2 All funding obligations of the City under this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of funds in its annual budget. ARTICLE 8. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 8.1 Lab must not commence work under this agreement until all required insurance has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Lab must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. 8.2 Lab must furnish to the Director of Engineering Services with the signed agreement (or amendment) a copy of the Certificate(s) of Insurance (COI) with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General Liability and Auto Liability policies, and a waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with COI. Project name and or number must be listed in Description Box of COI. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -written day notice of cancellation, required on all certificates or by applicable policy endorsements Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate EXHIBIT "B" Page 3 of 6 Commercial General Liability including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises — Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non -Owned 3. Rented/Leased $500,000 Combined Single Limit PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY (Errors and Omissions) $1,000,000 Per Claim (Defense costs must be outside policy limits) If claims made policy, retro date must be prior to inception of agreement, have extended reporting period provisions and identify any limitations regarding who is insured. 8.3 In the event of accidents of any kind related to this agreement, Lab must furnish the City with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. 8.4 Lab shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Lab's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. Lab is required to provide City with renewal Certificates. 8.6 Lab shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Lab shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Engineering Services P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 8.7 Lab agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: (a) List the City and its officers, officials, employees, volunteers, and elected representatives as additional insured by endorsement, as respects operations, completed operation and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the professional liability/Errors & Omissions policy; (b) Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; and (c) Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation, non -renewal or material change in coverage, and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. IEXHIBIT "B" I Page 4 of 6 8.8 Within five (5) calendar days of a suspension, cancellation, or non -renewal of coverage, Lab shall provide a replacement Certificate of insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Lab's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 8.9 In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Lab's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Lab to remove the exhibit hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) if any, which become due to Lab hereunder until Lab demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. 8.10 Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Lab may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Lab's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this agreement. 8.11 It is agreed that Lab's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self-insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this agreement. 8.12 It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. ARTICLE 9. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT The City may, at any time, with or without cause, terminate this Agreement upon seven days written notice to Lab at the address of record. Lab will be compensated for services performed up to termination. ARTICLE 10. CONTROLLING LAW This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Texas without regard to its conflicts of laws. Venue for legal proceedings lie exclusively in Nueces County, Texas. ARTICLE 11. DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS 11.1 Lab agrees to comply with City of Corpus Christi Ordinance No. 17112 and complete the Disclosure of Interests form as part of this Agreement, if required. 11.2 Lab agrees to comply with section 2252.908 of the Texas Government Code and complete Form 1295 Certificate of Interested Parties as part of this Agreement, if required. For more information, please review the information on the Texas Ethics Commission website at https://www.ethics.state.tx.us. 11.3 Lab agrees to comply with Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Government Code and file Form CIQ with the City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office, if required. For more information and to determine if you need to file a Form CIO, please review the information on the City Secretary's website at http:lfwww.cctexas.com/government/city-secretary/conflict-disclosure/index. ARTICLE 12. CLAIMS 12.1 Claims arising from this Agreement shall be made in writing, sworn to and signed by an authorized representative. The responsibility to substantiate a claim rests with the party making the claim. 12.2 All negotiations pursuant to this Article are confidential and shall be treated as compromise and settlement negotiations for purposes of applicable rules of evidence. IEXHIBIT "B" Page 5 of 6 ARTICLE 13. EXTENT OF AGREEMENT 13.1 This Agreement, including Exhibit "A" and these Terms and Conditions, represents the entire Agreement between City and Lab and supersedes all prior negotiation, representations or agreements, written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument signed by duly authorized representatives of City and Lab. If any conflict occurs between these Terms and Conditions and any other part of this Agreement, these Terms and Conditions are controlling. 13.2 In the event that any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, the remaining terms will be in full effect and this Agreement will be construed as if the invalid or unenforceable matters were never included in this Agreement. No waiver of any default will be a waiver of any future default. 13.3 Neither party will assign this Agreement without the express written approval of the other, but Lab may subcontract laboratory procedures as Lab deems necessary to meet the obligations of this Agreement. ARTICLE 14. SAFETY City and Lab agree that, in accordance with the generally accepted construction practice, the Project's general contractor will be solely and completely responsible for working conditions on the Project, including safety of all persons and property during the performance of the work and for compliance with all municipal, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, including OSHA. The duty of Lab in providing services is not, therefore, to include any review of, or responsibility for, the adequacy of the Project's general contractor's safety measures in, on or near the Project site. EXHIBIT "B" I Page 6 of 6 Basic Services: Preliminary Phase Design Phase Bid Phase Report Phase Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Additional Services: Permitting Warranty Phase Inspection Platting Survey Reporting 0 & M Manuals SCADA Subtotal Additional Services Summary of Fees Basic Services Fees Additional Services Fees Total of Fees COMPLETE PROJECT NAME Project No. xxxxxx Invoice No. 12345 Invoice Date: Total Amount Previous Total Percent Contract Amd No. 1 Amd No. 2 Contract Invoiced Invoice Invoice Complete $15,117 $0 $0 $15,117 $0 $1,000 $1,000 7% 20,818 0 0 20,818 1,000 500 1,500 7% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n/a 14,166 0 0 14,166 0 0 0 n/a 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $50,101 $0 $0 $50,101 $750 $1,500 $2,500 5% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 O n/a 9,011 0 0 9,011 0 0 0 0% 29,090 0 0 29,090 0 0 0 0% 1,294 0 0 1,294 0 0 0 0% TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 0% TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0% $39,395 $0 $0 $39,395 $0 $0 $0 0% $50,101 $0 $0 $50,101 $750 $1,500 $2,500 5% 39,395 0 0 39,395 0 0 0 0% $89,496 $0 $0 $89,496 $750 $1,500 $2,500 3% CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST City of arri ti City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definitions. COMPANY NAME: Rock Engineering & Testing Laboratory, Inc. P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: 6817 Leopard Street FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 4. Association e CITY: Corpus Christi ZIP: 78409 2. Partnership 5. Other e 3. Sole Owner 0 DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each `employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm.' Name Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Committee Board, Commission or 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Consultant FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Curtis A. Rock Title: Chief Oneratinn Officer (Type or Print) Signature of Certifying Date: Person: DEFINITIONS a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." g. "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. AGREEMENT for Construction Materials Testing and Engineering Services This AGREEMENT is between the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation ("CITY"), acting through its duly authorized City Manager or designee ("City Engineer"), and ROCK ENGINEERING & TESTING LABORATORY. INC., a Texas corporation or partnership ("LAB"), acting through its duly authorized representative who is Curtis A. Rock, Chief Operating Officer, which agree as follows: 1. DECLARATIONS: City desires to engage Lab to provide services in connection with City's project, described as follows: Gollihar Road from Carroll Lane to Kostorvz Road BOND 2014 (Proiect No. E13089) ("PROJECT"). 2. SCOPE OF WORK: Lab shall provide services to the Project in accordance with the accompanying Scope of Services and Fee Schedule attached as Exhibit A and the Terms and Conditions to Agreement attached as Exhibit B. 3. FEE: The City agrees to pay the Lab for services provided in accordance with Exhibit "A", Scope of Services and Fee Schedule under this Agreement, a total fee not to exceed $59.359.00. Monthly invoices will be submitted in accordance with Exhibit C. 4. CITY'S DISCLOSURE OF HAZARDOUS & TOXIC MATERIALS AND CONDITIONS AT THE PROJECT SITE: To the best of the City's knowledge, based upon currently available information, the only hazardous or toxic materials, as defined by the laws and regulations of the Federal government, the state, and city which exist at the PROJECT SITE are as follows: None. 5. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: All documents including contract documents (plans and specifications), record drawings, contractor's field data and submittal data will be the sole property of the City and may not be used again by Lab without the express terms written consent of the City Engineer. However, Lab may use standard details that are not specific to this Project. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI ROCK ENGINEERING & TESTING LABORATORY, INC. J.H. Edmonds, P.E. Date Curtis A. Rock Director of Engineering Services Chief Operating Officer 6817 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, TX 78409 RECOMMENDED (361) 883-4555 Office Operating Department Date APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Assistant City Attorney Date Date KIENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGEIANGIEMISTREET1E13089 GOLLIHAR FROM CARROLL TO KOSTORYZ BOND ISSUE 20141ROCK CMT115 1215 TESTING AGREEMENT.DOC Rev. 12115115 APPROVED Office of Management Date and Budget ATTEST Rebecca Huerta Date City Secretary Project No. El 3089 Accounting Unit: 3551-051 Account: 550920 Activity: El 3089013551 EXP Account Category: 50920 Fund Name: Street CIP BOND 2014 Encumbrance No. KIENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGEIANGIEMISTREET\E13089 GOLLIHAR FROM CARROLL TO KOSTORYZ BOND ISSUE 20141ROCK CMT115_1215 TESTING AGREEMENT.DOC Rev. 12/15115 Wednesday, December 21, 2016 City of Corpus Christi 1201 Leopard St Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Attn: Jeffrey Edmonds, P.E. •GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING •CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ENGINEERING TESTING •SOILS • ASPHALT • CONCRETE SUBJECT: ESTIMATED TESTING BUDGET FOR THE PROPOSED E13089 - Goliihar Rd Improvements - Kostoryz to Carroll Corpus Christi, TX RETL Proposal Number: P122016B Dear Jeffrey Edmonds, P.E. Rock Engineering and Testing Laboratory, Inc. (RETL) (TEPE Firm No. 2101) Is pleased to be selected to perform the Construction Materials Testing for the above referenced project. The Construction Materials Testing for the proposed construction project is based upon quantities as derived from the Plans made available to RETL as of the date of this proposal. The estimated testing for this project is $59,359.00 We understand that we have been chosen to provide these services for this publicly funded project. Therefore, by providing cost information we are not in violation of the Texas Professional Services Procurement Act. The estimated construction materials testing budget is based on a review of the information provided to RETL. An estimated breakdown of field and laboratory testing required is included as an attachment. In order to best respond to the project testing needs and schedules, please schedule testing a minimum of 48 hours in advance in order to defer any potential delays. RETL strives to accomodate all testing requests as they are received and can make accomodations with advanced notice to schedules. Please make note that the actual fees invoiced for this project will be based on the actual testing performed. The total fee assessed will be dependent on the contractor's construction techniques, number of trips made to the jobsite, elapsed time from technician arrival to commencement of testing activities, and any time the technician is required to be on-site but not performing testing activities. Please be advised that Weekend/Holiday/Overtime Laboratory and Field Testing will be billed at an addtional $38.00 RETL appreciates your consideration of our firm to assist you during the construction phase of your project. If you agree with this proposal, please sign the attached Laboratory Testing Services Agreement, submit the Distribution List and provide billing information. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (361) 883-4555 extension 415 If you have any questions regarding the proposal or would like to discuss further. Sincerely, Pablo Schmitt Estimator Rock Engineering and Testing ROCK ENGINEERING TESTING LABORATORY, INC 6817 LEOPARD STREET • CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS. 78409 OFFICE: (361) 883-4555 • FAX: 1361) 883-4711 • www.rocktesting.com Wednesday, December 21, 2016 Page 1 of 5 IEXHIBIT "A" 4 Page 1 of 5 I EXHIBIT "A" I Page 2 of 5 P1220168 E13089—Gollihar Rd Improvements - Kostoryz to Carroll City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, TX Jeffrey Edmonds, P.E. 01. LABORATORY G. PERSONNEL Admin Fee LS -lump Sum P119 ADMINISTRATION FEE it time per project) Wednesday, December 21, 2016 LIFTS/MIN QTYFREQ QTY RATE AMOUNT 1 1 1 Is $79.00 $79.00 01. LABORATORY SUBTOTAL $79.00 Page 2 of 5 P122016B E13089 — Gollihar Rd Improvements - Kostoryz to Carroll City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, TX Jeffrey Edmonds, P.E. 02. SOILS LIFTS/MIN QTYFREQ QTY RATE AMOUNT Al.SUBGRAAE Densities Asphalt Street LF -1 per 100 LF of each Zane/lift S6D0-1 NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY (ASTM 06938) V486 VEHICLE Densities Curb & Gutter LF -1 per 500 LF 5600-1 NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY (ASTM 06938) V486 VEHICLE Densities Driveway EA-levery2 5600-1 NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY (ASTM 06938) V486 VEHICLE Densities Sidewalks LF - 1 per 5000 LF 5600-1 NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY (ASTM 06938) V486 VEHICLE Raw Subgrade EA -1 each material type 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 130 130 ea 547.00 13 13 trip 548.00 27 27 ea $47.00 5 5 trip $48.00 12 12 ea 547.00 6 6 trip 548.00 B 8 ea $47.00 2 2 trip $48.00 56,110.00 5624.00 $1,269.00 5240.00 $564.00 5288.00 5376.00 596.00 5190 MATERIALS SAMPLING CHARGE 1 1 1 ea $60.00 560.00 5510 PROCTOR - STANDARD ASTM 0698 1 1 1 ea $226.00 5226.00 V486 VEHICLE 1 1 1 trip 548.00 $48.00 AS. BACKFILL Densities Trench Backfill LF -1 per 200 LF of each lane/lift S600-1 NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY (ASTM 06938) V486 VEHICLE Trench Backfill EA -1 each material type 1 1 362 362 ea 547.00 $17,014.00 37 37 trip $48.00 51,775.00 5190 MATERIALS SAMPLING CHARGE 1 1 1 ea 560.00 $60.00 5510 PROCTOR -STANDARD ASTM D698 1 1 1 ea $226,00 $226.00 V486 VEHICLE 1 1 1 trip 548.00 $48.00 • Wednesday, December 21, 2016 Page 3 of 5 EXHIBIT "A" Page 3 of 5 P122016B E130B9 — Gollihar Rd Improvements - Kostoryz to Carroll City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, TX Jeffrey Edmonds, P.E. 02. SOILS SUBTOTAL $29,025.00 03. FLEXIBLE BASE A3. FLEX BASE Densities Compacted Curb & Gutter LF -1 per 200 LF 5600-1 NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY (ASTM 06938) V486 VEHICLE Densities of Compacted Base LF -1 per 100 IF of each lane/lift 5600-1 NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY (ASTM 06938) V486 VEHICLE LIFTS/MIN QTYFREQ QTY RATE AMOUNT 1 1 1 1 27 27 ea $47.00 4 4 trip $48.00 $1,269.00 5192.00 260 260 ea $47.00 $12,220.00 26 26 trip $48.00 $1,248.00 03. FLEXIBLE BASE SUBTOTAL $14,929.00 04. HOT MIX ASPHALT CONCRETE LIFTS/MIN QTYFREQ QTY RATE AMOUNT B. ASPHALT Full Series T - 1 per 500 tons A105 ASPHALT FULL SERIES 5191 SAMPLE PREPARATION CHARGE In Place Cores LF-1per 1000LFofstreet A202 ASPHALT CORING/THICKNESS/DENSITY V486 VEHICLE Wednesday, December 21, 2016 1 1 1 1 10 10 ea $667,00 $6,670.00 10 10 hr $72.00 $720.00 3 3 ea 5104.00 1 1 trip $48.00 $312.00 548.00 04. HOT MIX ASPHALT CONCRETE SUBTOTAL $7,750.00 Page 4 of 5 IEXHIBIT "A" Page 4 of 5 P122016B E13089 - Gollihar Rd Improvements - Kostoryz to Carroll City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, TX Jeffrey Edmonds, P.E. 05. CONCRETE CYLINDERS CI. CONCRETE Curb & Gutter 1@7,3@28 LF -1 set every 500 LF LIFTS/MIN QTYFREQ QTY RATE AMOUNT C301-1 CONCRETE CYLINDERS (Min 4) 4 11. 44 ea 547.00 $2,068.00 5399 CONCRETE CYLINDERS PICK UP FEE 1 6 6 pour $46.00 5276.00 V486 VEHICLE 1 7 7 trip $48.00 $336.00 Curb Post & Grate Inlets 1@7,3@28 EA - 1 set every 6 each C301-1 CONCRETE CYLINDERS (Min 4) 4 3 12 ea $47.00 $564.00 5399 CONCRETE CYLINDERS PICK UP FEE 1 2 2 pour $46.00 $92.00 V486 VEHICLE 1 3 3 trip $48.00 $144.00 Driveways 107,3028 5F - 1 set every 2500 SF C301-1 CONCRETE CYLINDERS (Min 4) 4 4 16 ea $47.00 $752.00 5399 CONCRETE CYUNDERS PICK UP FEE 1 2 2 pour $46.00 $92.00 V486 VEHICLE 1 6 6 trip 548.00 5288.00 Manhole Base/Footing 1($7,3@28 EA -1 set every 10 each 0301-1 CONCRETE CYLINDERS (Min 4) 4 2 8 ea $47.00 $376.00 5399 CONCRETE CYLINDERS PICK UP FEE 1 1 1 pour 546.00 546.00 V486 VEHICLE 1 3 3 trip $48.00 $144.00 Sidewalk 1@7,3@28 5F.1 set every 4000 SF C301-1 CONCRETE CYLINDERS (Min 4) 4 10 40 ea $47.00 $1,880.00 5399 CONCRETE CYLINDERS PICK UP FEE 1 5 5 pour $46.00 $230.00 V486 VEHICLE 1 6 6 trip $48.00 5288.00 05. CONCRETE CYLINDERS SUBTOTAL $7,576.00 GRAND TOTAL $59,359.00 Special inspection such as REBAR INSPECTION are not included in this proposal. Please contact us for a quote for these items if needed. Wednesday, December 21, 2016 Page 5 of 5 EXHIBIT "A" Page5of5 TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO TESTING AGREEMENT ARTICLE 1. SERVICES: Lab will: 1.1 Provide only those services requested by City Engineer that, in the opinion of Lab, lie within the technical or professional areas of expertise of Lab and which Lab is adequately staffed and equipped to perform. 1.2 Perform technical services under the supervision of a licensed professional engineer and in compliance with the basic requirements of the appropriate standards of the American Society for Testing and Materials, where applicable, and other standards designated in writing by the City Engineer. 1.3 Promptly submit formal reports (printed and electronic copies) of tests, inspections and services performed indicating, where applicable, compliance with the Project specifications or other contract documents. Such reports must be complete and factual, citing the tests performed, methods employed, values obtained and parts of the structure of the Project area subjected to any testing. 1.4 Utilize testing equipment which has been calibrated according to applicable standards and, upon request, submit to the City Engineer or designee documentation of such calibration. Secure representative samples of those materials that the City's contractor proposes to use which require testing, together with relevant data concerning such materials including the point of origin and supplier. 1.5 Consider reports to be confidential and distribute reports only to those persons, organizations or agencies specifically designated in writing by the City Engineer. 1.6 Retain records relating to services performed for City for a period of two years following submission of any reports, during which period the records will be made available to the City at all reasonable times. 1.7 Pay salaries, wages, expenses, social security taxes, federal and state unemployment taxes and any other similar payroll taxes relating to the services. ARTICLE 2. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES: City Engineer or designee will: 2.1 Provide Lab with all plans, specifications, addenda, change orders, approved shop drawings and other information for the proper performance of services by Lab. 2.2 Issue authorization in writing giving Lab free access to the Project site and to all shops or yards where materials are prepared or stored. 2.3 Designate in writing those persons or firms which will act as the City's representative with respect to Lab's services to be performed under this Agreement and which must be promptly notified by Lab when it appears that materials tested or inspected are in non-compliance. Only the City Engineer or designee has authority to transmit instructions, receive information and data and/or interpret and define the City's policies and decisions with respect to the Project. Lab acknowledges that certain City representatives may have different types of authority concerning the Project. 2.4 Advise Lab sufficiently in advance of any operations so as to allow for assignment of personnel by Lab for completion of the required services. Such advance notice will be in accordance with that established by mutual agreement of the parties. 2.5 Direct the Project contractor, either by the Construction Contract or direct written order, to: EXHIBIT "B" I Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT "B" I Page 2 of 6 (a) Stop work at the appropriate times for Lab to perform contracted services; (b) Furnish such labor and all facilities needed by Lab to obtain and handle samples at the Project and to facilitate the specified inspection and tests; (c) Provide and maintain for use of Lab adequate space at the Project for safe storage and proper curing of test specimens that must remain on the Project site prior to, during and up to 60 days after testing. ARTICLE 3. GENERAL CONDITIONS 3.1 Lab, by the performance of services covered hereunder, does not in any way assume, abridge or abrogate any of those duties, responsibilities or authorities with regard to the Project that, by custom or contract, are vested in the Project architects, design engineers or any other design agencies or authorities. 3.2 Lab is not authorized to supervise, alter, relax, enlarge or release any requirement of the Project specifications or other contract documents nor to approve or accept any portion of the work. Lab does not have the right of rejection or the right to stop the work. City Engineer will direct the Project contractor to stop work at appropriate times for Lab to conduct the sampling, testing or inspection of operations covered by the Agreement. ARTICLE 4. FIELD MONITORING AND TESTING 4.1 City and Lab agree that Lab will be on-site to perform inspections for contracted services. The City and Lab also agree that Lab will not assume responsibility for Project contractor's means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction, and it is understood that the final services provided by Lab will not relieve the Project contractor of its responsibilities for performing the work in accordance with the Project plans and specifications. For the purposes of this Agreement, the word "inspection" is used to mean periodic observation of the work and the conducting of tests by Lab as specified in the Agreement. Continuous monitoring by Lab or its subcontractors does not mean that Lab is approving placement of materials. Inspection is not and should not be construed to be a warranty by Lab to the City or any other party. 4.2 Samples collected or tested by Lab remain the property of the City while in the custody of the Lab. Lab will retain the samples for a period of 60 days following the date of submission of any report related to the sample. Following the retention period, Lab will dispose of non -hazardous samples, and return hazardous, acutely toxic or radioactive samples and samples' containers and residues to City. City agrees to accept such samples and samples' containers. ARTICLE 5. STANDARD OF CARE AND WARRANTY Services performed by Lab will be conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the same locality. No other warranty either expressed or implied is made or intended by the Agreement or any reports. Lab will not be responsible for the interpretation or use by others of data developed by Lab. ARTICLE 6. INDEMNIFICATION Lab shall fully indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi and its officials, officers, agents, employees, or other entity, excluding the engineer or architect or that person's agent, employee or subconsuttant, over which the City exercises control ("Indemnitee") from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, to the extent that the damage is caused by or results from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property infringement or failure to pay a IEXHIBIT "B" I Page 3 of 6 subcontractor or supplier committed by Lab or its agent, Lab under contract or another entity over which Lab exercises control while in the exercise of rights or performance of the duties under this agreement. This indemnification does not apply to any liability resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the City or its employees, to the extent of such negligence. Lab shall defend Indemnitee, with counsel satisfactory to the City Attorney, from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, if the claim is not based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee. If a claim is based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee, the Lab shall reimburse the City's reasonable attorney's fees in proportion to the Lab's liability. Lab must advise City in writing within 24 hours of any claim or demand against City or Lab known to Lab related to or arising out of Lab's activities under this Agreement. ARTICLE 7. INVOICES AND PAYMENT 7.1 Lab will submit progress invoices to City Engineer monthly and final invoice upon completion of services. Each invoice is due and payable by City within 30 days of receipt and approval to pay by the City Engineer. 7.2 All funding obligations of the City under this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of funds in its annual budget. ARTICLE 8. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 8.1 Lab must not commence work under this agreement until all required insurance has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Lab must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. 8.2 Lab must furnish to the Director of Engineering Services with the signed agreement (or amendment) a copy of the Certificate(s) of Insurance (COI) with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General Liability and Auto Liability policies, and a waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with COI. Project name and or number must be listed in Description Box of COI. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -written day notice of cancellation, required on all certificates or by applicable policy endorsements Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate Commercial General Liability including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises — Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non -Owned 3. Rented/Leased $500,000 Combined Single Limit PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY (Errors and Omissions) $1,000,000 Per Claim (Defense costs must be outside policy limits) If claims made policy, retro date must be prior to inception of agreement, have extended reporting period provisions and identify any limitations regarding who is insured. 8.3 In the event of accidents of any kind related to this agreement, Lab must fumish the City with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. 8.4 Lab shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Lab's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. Lab is required to provide City with renewal Certificates. 8.6 Lab shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Lab shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Engineering Services P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 8.7 Lab agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: (a) List the City and its officers, officials, employees, volunteers, and elected representatives as additional insured by endorsement, as respects operations, completed operation and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the professional liability/Errors & Omissions policy; (b) Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; and (c) Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation, non -renewal or material change in coverage, and not Tess than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. IEXHIBIT "B" I Page 4 of 6 8.8 Within five (5) calendar days of a suspension, cancellation, or non -renewal of coverage, Lab shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Lab's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 8.9 In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Lab's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Lab to remove the exhibit hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) if any, which become due to Lab hereunder until Lab demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. 8.10 Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Lab may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Lab's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this agreement. 8.11 It is agreed that Lab's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self-insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this agreement. 8.12 It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. ARTICLE 9. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT The City may, at any time, with or without cause, terminate this Agreement upon seven days written notice to Lab at the address of record. Lab will be compensated for services performed up to termination. ARTICLE 10. CONTROLLING LAW This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Texas without regard to its conflicts of laws. Venue for legal proceedings lie exclusively in Nueces County, Texas. ARTICLE 11. DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS 11.1 Lab agrees to comply with City of Corpus Christi Ordinance No. 17112 and complete the Disclosure of Interests form as part of this Agreement, if required. 11.2 Lab agrees to comply with section 2252.908 of the Texas Government Code and complete Form 1295 Certificate of Interested Parties as part of this Agreement, if required. For more information, please review the information on the Texas Ethics Commission website at httos://www.eth ics. state. tx. us. 11.3 Lab agrees to comply with Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Government Code and file Form CIQ with the City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office, if required. For more information and to determine if you need to file a Form CIQ, please review the information on the City Secretary's website at http://www.cctexas.com/oovernment/city-secretary/conflict-disclosure/index. ARTICLE 12. CLAIMS 12.1 Claims arising from this Agreement shall be made in writing, sworn to and signed by an authorized representative. The responsibility to substantiate a claim rests with the party making the claim. 12.2 All negotiations pursuant to this Article are confidential and shall be treated as compromise and settlement negotiations for purposes of applicable rules of evidence. EXHIBIT "B" Page 5 of 6 ARTICLE 13. EXTENT OF AGREEMENT 13.1 This Agreement, including Exhibit "A" and these Terms and Conditions, represents the entire Agreement between City and Lab and supersedes all prior negotiation, representations or agreements, written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument signed by duly authorized representatives of City and Lab. If any conflict occurs between these Terms and Conditions and any other part of this Agreement, these Terms and Conditions are controlling. 13.2 In the event that any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, the remaining terms will be in full effect and this Agreement will be construed as if the invalid or unenforceable matters were never included in this Agreement. No waiver of any default will be a waiver of any future default. 13.3 Neither party will assign this Agreement without the express written approval of the other, but Lab may subcontract laboratory procedures as Lab deems necessary to meet the obligations of this Agreement. ARTICLE 14. SAFETY City and Lab agree that, in accordance with the generally accepted construction practice, the Project's general contractor will be solely and completely responsible for working conditions on the Project, including safety of all persons and property during the performance of the work and for compliance with all municipal, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, including OSHA. The duty of Lab in providing services is not, therefore, to include any review of, or responsibility for, the adequacy of the Project's general contractors safety measures in, on or near the Project site. EXHIBIT "B" Page 6 of 6 Basic Services: Preliminary Phase Design Phase Bid Phase Report Phase Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Additional Services: Permitting Warranty Phase Inspection Platting Survey Reporting O & M Manuals SCADA Subtotal Additional Services Summary of Fees Basic Services Fees Additional Services Fees Total of Fees COMPLETE PROJECT NAME Project No. xxxxxx Invoice No. 12345 Invoice Date: Total Amount Previous Total Percent Contract Amd No. 1 Amd No. 2 Contract Invoiced Invoice Invoice Complete $15,117 $0 $0 $15,117 $0 $1,000 $1,000 7% 20,818 0 0 20,818 1,000 500 1,500 7% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0n/a 14,166 0 0 14,166 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0n/a $50,101 $0 $0 $50,101 $750 $1,500 $2,500 5% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n/a 9,011 0 0 9,011 0 0 0 0% 29,090 0 0 29,090 0 0 0 0% 1,294 0 0 1,294 0 0 0 0% TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 0% TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0% $39,395 $0 $0 $39,395 $0 $0 $0 0% $50,101 $0 $0 $50,101 $750 $1,500 $2,500 5% 39,395 0 0 39,395 0 0 0 0% $89,496 $0 $0 $89,496 $750 $1,500 $2,500 3% CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST City of Christi City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definitions. COMPANY NAME: Rock Engineering & Testing Laboratory, Inc. P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: 6817 Leopard Street FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 4. Association B CITY: Corpus Christi ZIP: 78409 2. Partnership 5. Other e 3. Sole Owner DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each `employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm.' Name Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Committee Board, Commission or 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Consultant FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Curtis A. Rock Title: Chief Oneratine Officer (Type or Print) Signature of Certifying Date: Person: DEFINITIONS a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. g. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2016-149261 Date Filed: 12/28/2016 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Haas-Anderson Construction, Ltd. Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E13088 & E13089 Gollihar Road Improvements Kostoryz Road to Weber Road Bond 2014 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary Haas, Darryl Corpus Christi, TX United States X Anderson, Jim Corpus Christi, TX United States X Lamon, Tim Corpus Christi, TX United States X Parish, Jim Corpus Christi, TX United States X Cullen, Drew Corpus Christi, TX United States X Moore, Randall Corpus Christi, TX United States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. ❑ 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. vit4N, LEE ANN MITT SMITH ' � NOTARY PUBLIC '' % , i COMMISSION EXPIREB: i0.12-118-2017 Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE a ?-1-4 Swo n t and subscribed before me, by the said D I^Ct�i e I re, , this the day of G 20 , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. Signature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administe " g oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.277 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2017-152343 Date Filed: 01/10/2017 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Rock Engineering and Testing Laboratory, Inc. Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E13088 Construction Materials Engineering 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. X 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. s;"""'" ANDREA 8. CANTU 3_:' .i ' Notary Public, State of Texas N,`:�'�'P� Comm. Expires 05-10-2020 ''9lE O,, ;,,, . Notary ID 124920504 • Signature of authorized agent of contracting AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE /p�� �',q`—n i1 f Sworn tt�o and subscribed before me, by the said ` 'U� \ 1 We -�� Ot �1�. , this the ) business entity \� O day of -t.n, 20 11 , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. ail ..N2..a.--0 irdirea_L-6-Cbn-A Lti/Ia.eAr__'Sbutre<fc Signature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.277 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2017-152335 Date Filed: 01/10/2017 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Rock Engineering and Testing Laboratory, Inc. Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. 13089 Construction Materials Engineering 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. X 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. • ``"""''% ANDREA 8. CANTU _Notary Public, State of Texas . o' s'• . 4,... Comm. Expires 05-10-2020 -.• ',,;," `ur,,,, Notary ID 124!20504 n AFFIX ` NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said l l (Aa Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity /�a C. , 1k_ , this the 10 day of • 20 t1 , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. ONd AS2_0,-- .02r .Chn-tu kunrun e3 xi rce Signature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.277 Corpus Chr sti Engineering Gollihar Road Improvements (Weber Road to Carroll Lane & Carroll Lane to Kostoryz Road ) (Bond 2014, Proposition 1) Council Presentation January 24, 2017 Project Location �hrsti Engineering Corpus Christ by O O�- GOLLIHAR RD 2 Project Vicinity 4000 Corpus Chr sti Engineering Gollihar Road Cross Sections 0 �hrsti Engineering HOT MIX ASPHALT CONCRETE (HMAC) 5" HMAC 9" LIMESTONE BASE 12" COMPACTED UPGRADE PRIME COAT GEOGRID CYCLE TRACK CYCLE TRACK SIDEWALK TRAVEL LANES TRAVEL LANES SIDEWALK 4 Project Scope Corpus Chr sti Engineering This is two (2) Gollihar Road Bond 2014 projects for full depth reconstruction of the 5 -lane existing HMAC roadway including: New HMAC pavement with pavement markings and signage New cycle tracks and sidewalks behind the curb New sidewalks, ADA ramps, curb and gutter, concrete bus stops Upgraded traffic signals at Gollihar/Carroll intersection Underground utility improvements include storm water, wastewater, water and gas Project Schedule �hrsti Engineering 2016 1 2017 2018 19 0 N D J Bid/Award F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J Construction Construction Estimate: 720 days (24 months) AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of January 31, 2017 DATE: December 28, 2016 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager markvv@cctexas.com (361) 826-3897 Valerie H. Gray, P. E., Executive Director of Public Works valerieg@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: Andres Leal, Jr., P. E., Interim Director of Street Operations andyl@cctexas.com (361) 826-1957 CAPTION: J. H. Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Engineering Construction Contract Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) FY 2017 — Street Overlays Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Bay, LTD. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $9,421,462.50 for the total base bid and two (2) one-year renewal options for the Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) street overlays and to execute two construction materials testing agreement with Rock Engineering for Part 1 — West in the amount of $74,965.00 and for Part 2 — East in the amount of $74,965.00 for SPMP street overlays. PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is to obtain authority to execute a construction contract and a construction materials testing agreement for Street Preventative Maintenance Program street overlays project. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: This project is the continuation of the City Council approved 10 -year street maintenance program with an annual $15M budget for citywide Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) funded in part by the approved street maintenance fee. The program is entering the 4th year (FY 2017). This item provides the construction contract for Hot -Mix Asphalt Concrete (HMAC) overlays and associated construction material testing for FY 2017. The construction contract for HMAC overlays is a multi-year Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) construction contract with one base year plus two 1 -year optional renewals. Multiple "Delivery Orders" (DOs) will be issued to the contractor with specific scope and quantities for each street to implement the approved street work -plan throughout the City. The contractor's bid prices are the basis for the DO unit prices. The combined Overlay project was developed and bid as a single project with two Base Bid Schedules; Parts 1 — West of Crosstown and Part 2 — East of Crosstown. It is anticipated that up to five DOs will be issued for each part, for a total of ten potential DOs. The two smaller Base Bid Schedules were provided to increase competition and opportunities for small contractors to participate and potentially allow award to multiple contractors. Overlay reconstruction consists of milling the upper layer of HMAC (typically 1-1/2") with required base repairs, crack seal, limited curb & gutter, ADA improvements and other miscellaneous activities. The DOs identify specific streets and quantities to track all work and cost per street. Construction Materials Testing is required for the base material, HMAC and concrete to verify conformance to City standards for thickness, compaction and strength. Testing is performed at standard intervals based on the City's testing schedule, typically 300' intervals. The City website contains a list of all streets maintained through the SPMP and Street Department. The project bid on December 7, 2016, with bids as follows: Description Contractor Bay, Ltd. Haas -Anderson Construction, Ltd. J. Carroll Weaver, Inc. Base Bid Part 1 (West) $4,731,555.75 $4,963,940.25 $7,045,730.34 Base Bid Part 2 (East) $4,689,906.75 $4,781,940.25 $7,045,730.34 Total Base Bid $9,421,462.50 $9,745,880.50 $14,091,460.68 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize execution of one construction contract to one contractor for both parts. (Recommended) 2. Authorize execution of two construction contracts, one for each part. (Not Recommended) 3. Do not authorize execution of a construction contract. (Not Recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: LNV, Inc. is the design engineer that was selected for this project under RFQ 2016-01. Bay, Ltd. was evaluated and determined responsive, responsible and capable to complete both parts. Therefore, a single contract for construction of overlays for the SPMP program is recommended. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Complies with statutory requirements for construction contracts. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Street Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: x Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Project to Date Budget and Expenditures Current Year Future Years TOTALS Budget $762,939.00 $10,287,061.00 $11,050,000.00 Encumbered / Expended Amount 762,939.00 0 762,939.00 This item $9,571,392.50 $9,571,392.50 Future Anticipated Expenditures This Project 601,500.00 601,500.00 BALANCE $0 $114,168.50 $114,168.50 Fund(s): Comments: N/A RECOMMENDATION: City staff and LNV recommend one construction contract be awarded to Bay, LTD., for both parts, in the amount of $9,421,462.50 for the total base bid and to award two construction materials testing agreement with Rock Engineering in the amount of $74,965.00 for Part 1 — West and in the amount of $74,965.00 for Part 2 - East for the SPMP street overlays project. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Project Budget Location Map Presentation Letter of Recommendation Form 1295 — Bay, Ltd. Testing Agreement West Testing Agreement East Form 1295 — Rock Eng. (2) CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2017-152328 Date Filed: 01/10/2017 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Rock Engineering and Testing Laboratory, Inc. Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E16261 SPMP Fiscal Overlays Construction Materials Engineering 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. X 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. J,,,µy p,,,,, ANDREA B. CANTU r;°.- �'•.`e, Notary Public, State of Texas . -rE. ,...Comm, Expires 05-10-2020 .':;FOP,`,;,°, Notary ID 124920504 • Sig lure of authorized agent of contracting business entity AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE f Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said Oe C d2 L , this the k day of ae.,1 �. 20 ll , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. C0QNouu2a. re, (B. C'cn-Eu ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-Q.0.,,,,,,,,s- Signature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.277 PROJECT BUDGET ESTIMATE E16261 STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FY 2017 PROJECT FUNDS AVAILABLE: Street Operating $ 11,050,000 TOTAL 11,050,000 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction: Construction (Bay, Ltd.) Overlay THIS ITEM 9,421,463 Contingecy (0%) Design Fees: Preliminary Design (LNV) 49,760 Engineering Amendment 1 (LNV) 676,269 Contract for Bid Docs (LNV) 36,910 Geotechnical Inspection (Estimate) 49,000 Testing and Inspection: Construction Materials Testing - Overlay (Rock) Part 1 West...THIS ITEM 74,965 Construction Materials Testing - Overlay (Rock) Part 2 East...THIS ITEM 74,965 Construction Inspection (estimate) 276,000 Reimbursements: Contract Administration (Engineering/Finance/Capital Budget) 138,000 Engineering Services (Project Mgt/Constr Mgt) 138,000 Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 500 TOTAL 10,935,832 ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE $ 114,168 Edrop Tait Odem I -9lrn a r iii Ac (250 Doyle Portland Irgteside Arc NiJer;2s ENY Ircjrc:.. h San ,d ro Robstowini hristl Zet.o�r a Must Isla. Petronila Tierra Grande Mo Str7Rn Wand Srate Pari Chaprns r Ranch LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE PROJECT: E16261 Street Preventative Maintenance Program Fiscal Year 2017 Street Overlays CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Corpus Chr sti Engineering Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) Fiscal Year 2017 - Street Overlays Council Presentation January 24, 2017 Project Location �hrsti Engineering Overlays: • Bid in two parts to increase competition and to increase opportunities for small business • Developed in 2 parts to increase competition and increase opportunities for small business Project Scope �hrsti Engineering This provides for the construction and material testing for the SPMP overlay project (2017-2019). The project includes one base year plus two 1 - year optional extensions. Individual delivery orders (DO's) will be prepared for each year. The following is the summary of the overlay project construction: Two Parts: Part 1 (West), Part 2 (East) with up to 5 DO's for each part. The work includes: New HMAC surface layer with milling & replacement of 1-2 inches Repairs to the existing HMAC pavement of limestone base, and subgrade as needed Limited curb & gutter replacement, and Adjustments to utility manhole ring and covers 3 LNV engineers architects contractors Solutions Today with a Vision for Tomorrow December 16, 2016 J.H. Edmonds, P.E. Director of Engineering Services City of Corpus Christi P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 Re: Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) Fiscal Year 2017 Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Street Overlays Project No. E16261 Construction Contract Award Recommendation Dear Mr. Edmonds: On Wednesday, December 7, 2016, three (3) bids were received and opened for the above referenced project. One (1) of the bids contained errors due to a mistake in the online form, but did not change the outcome of the low bidder. The apparent low bidder based on the Total Base Bid for both Part 1 (West) and Part 2 (East) is Bay, Ltd. of Corpus Christi, Texas. Total Base Bid summary is shown below: Description Contractor Berry Contracting LP, DBA Bay, Ltd. Haas -Anderson Construction, Ltd. J. Carroll Weaver, Inc. Base Bid Part 1 - (West) $4,731,555.75 $4,963,940.25 $7,045,730.34 Base Bid Part 2 — (East) $4,689,906.75 $4,781,940.25 $7,045,730.34 Total Base Bid $9,421,462.50 $9,745,880.50 $14,091,460.68 This project consisted of a base bid only and no alternatives. The scope of work for these improvements is included below: Base Bid: This project is part of the Citywide Street Preventative Maintenance Program Fiscal Year 2017 program that provides for the implementation of the citywide SPMP, consisting of hot -mix asphalt overlays and seal coats for selected arterial, collector and local (residential) streets. THIS CONTRACT IS FOR STREET OVERLAYS ONLY. Up to five (5) delivery orders will be issued for each of two (2) designated areas. Two Base Bid Schedules, included in this single bid invitation, are for two (2) designated areas within the city limits as follows: Base Bid Part 1 (West) and Base Bid Part 2 (East). This project is an IDIQ construction contract to perform street overlay improvements throughout the City, including minor utility manhole ring & cover and valve cover adjustments. The Work will be issued in individual work orders called "Delivery Orders" that provide specific scope and requirements. 801 NAVIGATION 1 SUITE 300 1 CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78408 OFFICE 361.883.1984 1 FAX 361.883.1986 1 WWW.LNVINC.COM CNV Solutions Today with a engineers architects contractors Vision for Tomorrow We reviewed the information required in Section 00 45 16 Statement of Experience of the contract documents that was submitted by Bay, Ltd. and found no anomalies. This information is enclosed for your review. Bay, Ltd. is very familiar with City of Corpus Christi Street Projects of this scope. It is our opinion that Bay, Ltd. is capable of completing a job of this magnitude. Bay, Ltd. also has several construction projects currently ongoing for the City of Corpus Christi and throughout this area as listed in their Section 00 45 16 Statement of Experience. The bids received for this project are within the City budget for SPMP FY2017 Street Overlays. Based on the information submitted by the bidders, and upon evaluating the funding and priority for the need of the project, LNV recommends that the City award the following project to Bay, Ltd. • Base Bid Part 1- (West): $4,731,555.75 • Base Bid Part 2- (East): $4,689,906.75 • Base Bid Total : $9,421,462.50 Also enclosed is the project bid tabulation and Bay, Ltd.'s bid proposal for this project. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions. Sincerely, LNV, Inc. TBPE No. F-366 Norman Ramirez, EIT Project Manager Enclosures: 1. Section 00 45 16 Statement of Experience 2. Bid Tabulation 3. Bay, Ltd. Bid Proposal cc: Chris Hale, P.E. Sylvia Arriaga 801 NAVIGATION 1 SUITE 300 1 CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78408 OFFICE 361 883.1984 1 FAX 361.883.1986 1 WWW.LNVINC.COM CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2017-152275 Date Filed: 01/10/2017 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Bay Ltd. Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi Engineering Services 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E16261 Street Preventative Maintenance Program (SPMP) Fiscal Year 2017 Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Street Overlays 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary Lentz, Jon Corpus Christi, TX United States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. ❑ ,,NppllrlOIM.16 t ;'��' 6 AFFIDAVIT ,0,, N- .. R. �4a,�,� Y (� ��,� I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. rte•* PG SI. i co 01 ° �4. 5ignatu of authorized agent of contracting busine s entity r o ' AFFIX NOTARY S'i'Alylio / igALN2A8bVEJon L-e1 Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said r' , this the 1 O r day of Janna► 20 11 to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. g.tevin4 Nd t -Publ/' 2t,g41/4_. 5Rel ;dL Signature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title ofrofficer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.277 AGREEMENT for Construction Materials Testing and Engineering Services This AGREEMENT is between the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation ("CITY"), acting through its duly authorized City Manager or designee ("City Engineer"), and ROCK ENGINEERING & TESTING LABORATORY, INC., a Texas corporation or partnership ("LAB"), acting through its duly authorized representative who is Curtis A. Rock, Chief Operating Officer, which agree as follows: 1. DECLARATIONS: City desires to engage Lab to provide services in connection with City's project, described as follows: SPMP FY 2017 Street Overlays - West (Project No. E16261) ("PROJECT'). 2. SCOPE OF WORK: Lab shall provide services to the Project in accordance with the accompanying Scope of Services and Fee Schedule attached as Exhibit A and the Terms and Conditions to Agreement attached as Exhibit B. 3. FEE: The City agrees to pay the Lab for services provided in accordance with Exhibit "A", Scope of Services and Fee Schedule under this Agreement, a total fee not to exceed $74,965.00. Monthly invoices will be submitted in accordance with Exhibit C. 4. CITY'S DISCLOSURE OF HAZARDOUS & TOXIC MATERIALS AND CONDITIONS AT THE PROJECT SITE: To the best of the City's knowledge, based upon currently available information, the only hazardous or toxic materials, as defined by the laws and regulations of the Federal government, the state, and city which exist at the PROJECT SITE are as follows: None. 5. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: All documents including contract documents (plans and specifications), record drawings, contractor's field data and submittal data will be the sole property of the City and may not be used again by Lab without the express terms written consent of the City Engineer. However, Lab may use standard details that are not specific to this Project. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI ROCK ENGINEERING & TESTING LA- RATO C. Cz� January 09, 2016 J.H. Edmonds, P.E. Date Curtis A. Rock Roetta C. Rock, President Date Director of Engineering Services Chief Operating Officer 6817 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, TX 78409 RECOMMENDED (361) 883-4555 Office Operating Department Date APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Assistant City Attorney Date KIENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGEIANGIEMISTREETIE16261 SPMP YEAR *ROCK CMT FOR WEST1151215 TESTING AGREEMENT.DOC Rev. 12/15/15 APPROVED Office of Management Date and Budget ATTEST Rebecca Huerta Date City Secretary Project No. E16261 Accounting Unit: 1041-12415-051 Account: 530000 Activity: E16261011041 EXP Account Category: 30000 Fund Name: Street Fund Encumbrance No. KIENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGEIANGIEMISTREETVE16261 SPMP YEAR 41ROCK CMT FOR WEST151215 TESTING AGREEMENT.DOC Rev. 12/15/15 Friday, January 06, 2017 City of Corpus Christi 1201 Leopard St Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Attn: Jeffrey Edmonds, P.E. •GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING •CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ENGINEERING TESTING *SOILS • ASPHALT • CONCRETE SUBJECT: ESTIMATED TESTING BUDGET FOR THE PROPOSED E16261 SPMP Fiscal Year 2017 IDIQ Street Overlays - West Corpus Christi, TX R E T L Proposal Number: P010617A2 Dear Jeffrey Edmonds, P.E. Rock Engineering and Testing Laboratory, Inc. (RETL) (TBPE Firm No. 2101) is pleased to be selected to perform the Construction Materials Testing for the above referenced project. The Construction Materials Testing for the proposed construction project is based upon quantities as derived from the Plans made available to RETL as of the date of this proposal. The estimated Testing for this project is $74,965.00 We understand that we have been chosen to provide these services for this publicly funded project. Therefore, by providing cost information we are not in violation of the Texas Professional Services Procurement Aci. The estimated construction materials testing budget is based an a review of the information provided to RETL. An estimated breakdown of field and laboratory testing required is included as an attachment. In order to best respond to the project testing needs and schedules, please schedule testing a minimum of 48 hours in advance in order to defer any potential delays. RBI. strives to accomodate all testing requests as they are received and can make accomodations with advanced notice to schedules. Please make note that the actual fees invoiced for this project will be based on the actual testing performed. The total fee assessed will be dependent on the contractor's construction techniques, number of trips made to the jobsile, elapsed time from technician arrival to commencement of testing activities, and any time the technician is required to be on-site but not performing testing activities. Please be advised that Weekend/Holiday/Overtime Laboratory and Field Testing will be billed at an addtional $33.00 7 RETL appreciates your consideration of our firm to assist you during the construction phase of your project. If you agree with this proposal, please sign the attached Laboratory Testing Services Agreement, submit the Distribution List and provide billing information. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (361) 883-4555 extension 415 if you have any questions regarding the proposal or would like to discuss further. Sincerely, Pablo Schmitt Estimator Rock Engineering and Testing ROCK ENGINEERING TESTING LABORATORY, INC 6817 LEOPARD STREET • CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, 78409 OFFICE: 0611883-4555 • FAX: )361) 883-4711 • www.rocktesting.cam Friday, January 06, 2017 Page 1 of 4 EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 4 P010617A2 E16261 SPMP Fiscal Year 2017 IDIQ Street Overlays - West City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, TX Jeffrey Edmonds, P.E. 00. LABORATORY Admin Fee Project Setup P119 ADMINISTRATION FEE (1 time per project) LIFTS/MIN QTYFREQ QTY RATE AMOUNT 1 1 1 Is 579.00 579.00 00. LABORATORY SUBTOTAL $79.00 01. INVESTIGATIVE ANALYSIS LIFTS/MIN QTYFREQ QTY RATE AMOUNT L L49/FIELD 100 Cores. Care through Asphalt, base and hand auger 1 ft Into subgrade P396 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 5486T TRAFFIC CONTROL V486 VEHICLE S1.50/15 - SUBGRADE PI/LL and Moisture 5310 ATTERBERG LIMITS/PLASTICITY INDEXASTM 04318 5532 MOISTURE CONTENT 53. SOILS - FLEX BASE Composite PI/LL 1 192 192 hr 566.00 $12,672.00 1 12 12 day $2,016.00 524,192.00 1 12 12 trip $48.00 5576.00 1 1 100 100 ea $63.00 56,300.00 100 100 ea $16.00 51,600.00 5502 ATTERBERG UMITS/PLASTFClTY INDEX (with Aggregate) ASTM 04318 1 70 70 ea $99.00 56,930.00 Friday, January 06, 2017 01. INVESTIGATIVE ANALYSIS SUBTOTAL $52,270.00 Page 2 of 4 EXHIBIT "A" Page 2of4 P010617A2 E16261 SPMP Fiscal Year 2017 IDIQ Street Overlays - West City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, TX Jeffrey Edmonds, P.E. 02. OVERLAY AND SEALCOAT REPAIRS A. ASPHALT LIFTS/MIN QTYFREQ QTY RATE AMOUNT A105 ASPHALT FULL SERIES 1 3 Sea $667.00 $2,001.00 A202 ASPHALT CORING/THICKNESS/DENSITY 1 9 9 ea 5104.00 $936.00 5191 SAMPLE PREPARATION CHARGE 1 3 3 hr $72.00 5216.00 5200 ROLLING PATTERN 1 50 50 hr 574.00 53,700.00 C1. CONCRETE 11157,3928 C301-1 CONCRETE CYLINDERS (Min 4) 4 22 88 ea 547.00 $4,136.00 0501 OBSERVATIONS (Pier, Rebar, Structural Steel, etc) 1 5 5 hr $91.00 5455.00 S399 CONCRETE CYLINDERS PICK UP FEE 1 22 22 pour $46,00 $1,012.00 M. MISCELLANEOUS Vehicle Fees for Densities, Material Sampling and Concrete Cylinders V486 VEHICLE S1. SOILS - SUBGRADE 1 32 32 trip 548.00 51,536.00 5190 MATERIALS SAMPLING CHARGE 1 5 5 ea 560.00 5300.00 5310 ATTERBERG LIMITS/PLASTICITY INDEX ASTM 04318 1 5 5 ea 563.00 5315.00 5510 PROCTOR -STANDARDASTM D698 1 5 5 ea 5226.00 51,130.00 5600-1 NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY MIN 3 (ASTM D6938) 1 24 24 ea $47.00 $1,128,00 53. SOILS - FLEX BASE S190 MATERIALS SAMPLING CHARGE 1 4 4 ea $60.00 5240.00 5502 ATTERBERG UMITS/PLASTICITY INDEX (with Aggregate) ASTM D4318 1 4 4 ea $99.00 $396.00 5504 GRADATION (Sieve Analysis} 1 4 4 ea 599.00 $396.00 S522 PROCTOR- MODIFIED ASTM D1557 1 4 4ea 5266.00 $1,064.00 5546 WET BALL MILL 1 4 4 ea $338.00 51,352.00 5600-1 NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY MIN 3 (ASTM D6938) 1 49 49 ea 547.00 52,303.00 Friday, January 06, 2017 02. OVERLAY AND SEALCOAT REPAIRS SUBTOTAL $2Z,616.00 Page 3 of 4 EXHIBIT "A" Page 3 of 4 GRAND TOTAL $74,965.00 Special inspection such as REBAR INSPECTION are not Included In this proposal. Please contact us for a quote for these items if needed. Friday, January 06, 2017 Page 4 of 4 IEXHIBIT "A" Page 4 of 4 TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO TESTING AGREEMENT ARTICLE 1. SERVICES: Lab will: 1.1 Provide only those services requested by City Engineer that, in the opinion of Lab, lie within the technical or professional areas of expertise of Lab and which Lab is adequately staffed and equipped to perform. 1.2 Perform technical services under the supervision of a licensed professional engineer and in compliance with the basic requirements of the appropriate standards of the American Society for Testing and Materials, where applicable, and other standards designated in writing by the City Engineer. 1.3 Promptly submit formal reports (printed and electronic copies) of tests, inspections and services performed indicating, where applicable, compliance with the Project specifications or other contract documents. Such reports must be complete and factual, citing the tests performed, methods employed, values obtained and parts of the structure of the Project area subjected to any testing. 1.4 Utilize testing equipment which has been calibrated according to applicable standards and, upon request, submit to the City Engineer or designee documentation of such calibration. Secure representative samples of those materials that the City's contractor proposes to use which require testing, together with relevant data concerning such materials including the point of origin and supplier. 1.5 Consider reports to be confidential and distribute reports only to those persons, organizations or agencies specifically designated in writing by the City Engineer. 1.6 Retain records relating to services performed for City for a period of two years following submission of any reports, during which period the records will be made available to the City at all reasonable times. 1.7 Pay salaries, wages, expenses, social security taxes, federal and state unemployment taxes and any other similar payroll taxes relating to the services. ARTICLE 2. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES: City Engineer or designee will: 2.1 Provide Lab with all plans, specifications, addenda, change orders, approved shop drawings and other information for the proper performance of services by Lab. 2.2 Issue authorization in writing giving Lab free access to the Project site and to all shops or yards where materials are prepared or stored. 2.3 Designate in writing those persons or firms which will act as the City's representative with respect to Lab's services to be performed under this Agreement and which must be promptly notified by Lab when it appears that materials tested or inspected are in non-compliance. Only the City Engineer or designee has authority to transmit instructions, receive information and data and/or interpret and define the City's policies and decisions with respect to the Project. Lab acknowledges that certain City representatives may have different types of authority concerning the Project. 2.4 Advise Lab sufficiently in advance of any operations so as to allow for assignment of personnel by Lab for completion of the required services. Such advance notice will be in accordance with that established by mutual agreement of the parties. 2.5 Direct the Project contractor, either by the Construction Contract or direct written order, to: IEXHIBIT"B" I Page 1 of 6 (a) Stop work at the appropriate times for Lab to perform contracted services; (b) Furnish such labor and all facilities needed by Lab to obtain and handle samples at the Project and to facilitate the specified inspection and tests; (c) Provide and maintain for use of Lab adequate space at the Project for safe storage and proper curing of test specimens that must remain on the Project site prior to, during and up to 60 days after testing. ARTICLE 3. GENERAL CONDITIONS 3.1 Lab, by the performance of services covered hereunder, does not in any way assume, abridge or abrogate any of those duties, responsibilities or authorities with regard to the Project that, by custom or contract, are vested in the Project architects, design engineers or any other design agencies or authorities. 3.2 Lab is not authorized to supervise, alter, relax, enlarge or release any requirement of the Project specifications or other contract documents nor to approve or accept any portion of the work. Lab does not have the right of rejection or the right to stop the work. City Engineer will direct the Project contractor to stop work at appropriate times for Lab to conduct the sampling, testing or inspection of operations covered by the Agreement. ARTICLE 4. FIELD MONITORING AND TESTING 4.1 City and Lab agree that Lab will be on-site to perform inspections for contracted services. The City and Lab also agree that Lab will not assume responsibility for Project contractor's means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction, and it is understood that the final services provided by Lab will not relieve the Project contractor of its responsibilities for performing the work in accordance with the Project plans and specifications. For the purposes of this Agreement, the word "inspection" is used to mean periodic observation of the work and the conducting of tests by Lab as specified in the Agreement. Continuous monitoring by Lab or its subcontractors does not mean that Lab is approving placement of materials. Inspection is not and should not be construed to be a warranty by Lab to the City or any other party. 4.2 Samples collected or tested by Lab remain the property of the City while in the custody of the Lab. Lab will retain the samples for a period of 60 days following the date of submission of any report related to the sample. Following the retention period, Lab will dispose of non -hazardous samples, and retum hazardous, acutely toxic or radioactive samples and samples' containers and residues to City. City agrees to accept such samples and samples' containers. ARTICLE 5. STANDARD OF CARE AND WARRANTY Services performed by Lab will be conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the same locality. No other warranty either expressed or implied is made or intended by the Agreement or any reports. Lab will not be responsible for the interpretation or use by others of data developed by Lab. ARTICLE 6. INDEMNIFICATION Lab shall fully indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi and its officials, officers, agents, employees, or other entity, excluding the engineer or architect or that person's agent, employee or subconsultant, over which the City exercises control ("Indemnitee") from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, to the extent that the damage is caused by or results from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property infringement or failure to pay a IEXHIBIT "B" I Page 2 of 6 subcontractor or supplier committed by Lab or its agent, Lab under contract or another entity over which Lab exercises control while in the exercise of rights or performance of the duties under this agreement. This indemnification does not apply to any liability resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the City or its employees, to the extent of such negligence. Lab shall defend Indemnitee, with counsel satisfactory to the City Attorney, from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, if the claim is not based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee. If a claim is based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee, the Lab shall reimburse the City's reasonable attorney's fees in proportion to the Lab's liability. Lab must advise City in writing within 24 hours of any claim or demand against City or Lab known to Lab related to or arising out of Lab's activities under this Agreement. ARTICLE 7. INVOICES AND PAYMENT 7.1 Lab will submit progress invoices to City Engineer monthly and final invoice upon completion of services. Each invoice is due and payable by City within 30 days of receipt and approval to pay by the City Engineer. 7.2 All funding obligations of the City under this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of funds in its annual budget. ARTICLE 8. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 8.1 Lab must not commence work under this agreement until all required insurance has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Lab must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. 8.2 Lab must fumish to the Director of Engineering Services with the signed agreement (or amendment) a copy of the Certificate(s) of Insurance (COI) with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General Liability and Auto Liability policies, and a waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with COI. Project name and or number must be listed in Description Box of COI. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -written day notice of cancellation, required on all certificates or by applicable policy endorsements Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate EXHIBIT "B" Page 3 of 6 Commercial General Liability including: $1,000,000 Per Occurrence 1. Commercial Broad Form $2,000,000 Aggregate 2. Premises — Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury AUTO LIABILITY (including) $500,000 Combined Single Limit 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non -Owned 3. Rented/Leased PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY $1,000,000 Per Claim (Errors and Omissions) (Defense costs must be outside policy limits) If claims made policy, retro date must be prior to inception of agreement, have extended reporting period provisions and identify any limitations regarding who is insured. 8.3 In the event of accidents of any kind related to this agreement, Lab must furnish the City with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. 8.4 Lab shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Lab's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no Tess than A- VII. Lab is required to provide City with renewal Certificates. 8.6 Lab shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Lab shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Engineering Services P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 8.7 Lab agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: (a) List the City and its officers, officials, employees, volunteers, and elected representatives as additional insured by endorsement, as respects operations, completed operation and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the professional liability/Errors & Omissions policy; (b) Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; and (c) Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation, non -renewal or material change in coverage, and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. IEXHIBIT "B" I Page 4 of 6 EXHIBIT "B" I Page 5 of 6 8.8 Within five (5) calendar days of a suspension, cancellation, or non -renewal of coverage, Lab shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Lab's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 8.9 In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Lab's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Lab to remove the exhibit hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) if any, which become due to Lab hereunder until Lab demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. 8.10 Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Lab may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Lab's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this agreement. 8.11 It is agreed that Lab's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self-insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this agreement. 8.12 It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. ARTICLE 9. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT The City may, at any time, with or without cause, terminate this Agreement upon seven days written notice to Lab at the address of record. Lab will be compensated for services performed up to termination. ARTICLE 10. CONTROLLING LAW This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Texas without regard to its conflicts of laws. Venue for legal proceedings lie exclusively in Nueces County, Texas. ARTICLE 11. DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS 11.1 Lab agrees to comply with City of Corpus Christi Ordinance No. 17112 and complete the Disclosure of Interests form as part of this Agreement, if required. 11.2 Lab agrees to comply with section 2252.908 of the Texas Government Code and complete Form 1295 Certificate of Interested Parties as part of this Agreement, if required. For more information, please review the information on the Texas Ethics Commission website at https://www.ethics.state.tx.us. 11.3 Lab agrees to comply with Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Government Code and file Form CIQ with the City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office, if required. For more information and to determine if you need to file a Form CIQ, please review the information on the City Secretary's website at http://www.cctexas.cam/govemment/citv-secretary/conflict-disclosure/index. ARTICLE 12. CLAIMS 12.1 Claims arising from this Agreement shall be made in writing, sworn to and signed by an authorized representative. The responsibility to substantiate a claim rests with the party making the claim. 12.2 All negotiations pursuant to this Article are confidential and shall be treated as compromise and settlement negotiations for purposes of applicable rules of evidence. EXHIBIT "B" I Page 6 of 6 ARTICLE 13. EXTENT OF AGREEMENT 13.1 This Agreement, including Exhibit "A' and these Terms and Conditions, represents the entire Agreement between City and Lab and supersedes all prior negotiation, representations or agreements, written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument signed by duly authorized representatives of City and Lab. If any conflict occurs between these Terms and Conditions and any other part of this Agreement, these Terms and Conditions are controlling. 13.2 In the event that any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, the remaining terms will be in full effect and this Agreement will be construed as if the invalid or unenforceable matters were never included in this Agreement. No waiver of any default will be a waiver of any future default. 13.3 Neither party will assign this Agreement without the express written approval of the other, but Lab may subcontract laboratory procedures as Lab deems necessary to meet the obligations of this Agreement. ARTICLE 14. SAFETY City and Lab agree that, in accordance with the generally accepted construction practice, the Project's general contractor will be solely and completely responsible for working conditions on the Project, including safety of all persons and property during the performance of the work and for compliance with all municipal, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, including OSHA. The duty of Lab in providing services is not, therefore, to include any review of, or responsibility for, the adequacy of the Project's general contractor's safety measures in, on or near the Project site. Basic Services: Preliminary Phase Design Phase Bid Phase Report Phase Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Additional Services: Permitting Warranty Phase Inspection Platting Survey Reporting O & M Manuals SCADA Subtotal Additional Services Summary of Fees Basic Services Fees Additional Services Fees Total of Fees COMPLETE PROJECT NAME Project No. xxxxxx Invoice No. 12345 Invoice Date: Total Amount Previous Total Percent Contract Amd No. 1 Amd No. 2 Contract Invoiced Invoice Invoi $15,117 $0 $0 $15,117 $0 $1,000 $1,000 7% 20,818 0 0 20,818 1,000 500 1,500 7% 0 0 0 0 0 0 O n/a 14,166 0 0 14,166 0 0 0 n/a 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 O $50,101 $0 $0 $50,101 $750 $1,500 $2,500 5% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 O n/a 9,011 0 0 9,011 0 0 0 0% 29,090 0 0 29,090 0 0 0 0% 1,294 0 0 1,294 0 0 0 0% TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 0% TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0% $39,395 $0 $0 $39,395 $0 $0 $0 0% $50,101 $0 $0 $50,101 $750 $1,500 $2,500 5% 39,395 0 0 39,395 0 0 0 0% $89,496 $0 $0 $89,496 $750 $1,500 $2,500 3% City CorpChn ti City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended,, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definitions. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST COMPANY NAME: Rock Engineering & Testing Laboratory, Inc. P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: 6817 Leopard Street FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 4. Association CITY: Corpus Christi ZIP: 78409 2. Partnership 5. Other a 3. Sole Owner DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each `employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm.' Name Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Committee Board, Commission or 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Consultant a FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Roetta C. Rock, President Certifying Person: Curtis A. Rock Title: Chief Oneratine Officer Signature of Certifying Person: DEFINITIONS Date: January 09, 2016 a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." g. "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. AGREEMENT for Construction Materials Testing and Engineering Services This AGREEMENT is between the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation ("CITY"), acting through its duly authorized City Manager or designee ("City Engineer"), and ROCK ENGINEERING & TESTING LABORATORY, INC., a Texas corporation or partnership ("LAB"), acting through its duly authorized representative who is Curtis A. Rock, Chief Operating Officer, which agree as follows: 1. DECLARATIONS: City desires to engage Lab to provide services in connection with City's project, described as follows: SPMP FY 2017 Street Overlays - East (Project No. E16261) ("PROJECT"). 2. SCOPE OF WORK: Lab shall provide services to the Project in accordance with the accompanying Scope of Services and Fee Schedule attached as Exhibit A and the Terms and Conditions to Agreement attached as Exhibit B. 3. FEE: The City agrees to pay the Lab for services provided in accordance with Exhibit "A", Scope of Services and Fee Schedule under this Agreement, a total fee not to exceed $74.965.00. Monthly invoices will be submitted in accordance with Exhibit C. 4. CITY'S DISCLOSURE OF HAZARDOUS & TOXIC MATERIALS AND CONDITIONS AT THE PROJECT SITE: To the best of the City's knowledge, based upon currently available information, the only hazardous or toxic materials, as defined by the laws and regulations of the Federal government, the state, and city which exist at the PROJECT SITE are as follows: None. 5. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: All documents including contract documents (plans and specifications), record drawings, contractor's field data and submittal data will be the sole property of the City and may not be used again by Lab without the express terms written consent of the City Engineer. However, Lab may use standard details that are not specific to this Project. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI ROCK ENGINEERING & TESTING LABORATORY, INC. V'l-e' aZ January 9, 2017 J.H. Edmonds, P.E. Date Curtis A. Rock Roetta C. Rock, President Date Director of Engineering Services Chief Operating Officer 6817 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, TX 78409 RECOMMENDED (361) 883-4555 Office Operating Department Date APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Assistant City Attorney Date KIENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE ANGIEMISTREET1E16261 SPMP YEAR *ROCK CMT FOR EAS -1115 1215 TESTING AGREEMENT.DOC Rev. 12/15/15 APPROVED Office of Management Date and Budget ATTEST Rebecca Huerta Date City Secretary Project No. E16261 Accounting Unit: 1041-12415-051 Account: 530000 Activity: El 6261011041 EXP Account Category: 30000 Fund Name: Street Fund Encumbrance No. K:4ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGEIANGIEMISTREET1E16261 SPMP YEAR 41ROCK CMT FOR EAST4151215 TESTING AGREEMENT.DOC Rev. 12/15/15 EXHIBIT "A'° Page 1 of 4 I Friday, January 06, 2017 City of Corpus Christi 1201 Leopard St Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Attn: Jeffrey Edmonds. P.E. •GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING •CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ENGINEERING TESTING •SOILS • ASPHALT • CONCRETE SUBJECT: ESTIMATED TESTING BUDGET FOR THE PROPOSED E16261 SPMP Fiscal Year 2017 IDIQ Street Overlays - East Corpus Christi, TX RETL Proposal Number: P010617A1 Dear Jeffrey Edmonds. P.E. Rock Engineering and Testing Laboratory, Inc. (RETL) (TBPE Firrn No. 2101) is pleased to be selected to perform the Construction Materials Testing for the above referenced project. The Construction Materials Testing for the proposed construction project is based upon quantities as derived from the Plans made available to RETL as of the date of this proposal. The estimated testing for this project Is $74.965.00 __ ._. We understand that we have been chosen to provide these services for this publicly funded project. Therefore, by providing cost information we are not in violation of the Texas Professional Services Procurement Act. The estimated construction materials testing budget is based on a review of the information provided to RETL. An estimated breakdown of field and laboratory testing required is Included as an attachment. In order to best respond to the project testing needs and schedules, please schedule testing a minimum of 48 hours in advance in order to defer any potential delays. RETL strives to accomodate all testing requests as they are received and can make accomodations with advanced notice to schedules. Please make note that the actual fees invoiced for this project will be based on the actual testing performed. The total fee assessed will be dependent on the contractor's construction techniques. number of trips made to the jobsife, elapsed time from technician arrival to commencement of testing activities, and any time the technician is required to be on-site but not performing testing activities. Please be advised that Weekend/Holiday/Overtime Laboratory and Field Testing will be billed at an addtlonal $33.00 RETL appreciates your consideration of our firm to assist you during the construction phase of your project. If you agree with this proposal, please sign the attached Laboratory Testing Services Agreement, submit the Distribution List and provide billing information. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (361) 883-4555 extension 415 if you have any questions regarding the proposal or would like to discuss further. Sincerely, Pablo Schmitt Estimator Rock Engineering and Testing ROCK ENGCNEERiNG TESTING LABORATORY, INC 6817 LEOPARD STREET • CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, 78409 OFFICE: 1361) 883-4555 • FAX: (3611 883-4711 • www.rocktesting.com Friday, January 06, 2017 Page 1 of 4 I EXHIBIT "A" I Page 2 of 4 P010617A1 E16261 SPMP Fiscal Year 2017 IDIQ Street Overlays - East City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, TX Jeffrey Edmonds. P.E. 01. INVESTIGATIVE ANALYSIS L LAB/FIELD 100 Cores. Core through Asphalt, base and hand auger 1 R Into subgrade P396 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN S486T TRAFFIC CONTROL V486 VEHICLE 51. SOILS - SUBGRADE PI/LL and Moisture EA • l per each 5310 ATTERBERG UMITS/PLASTICITY INDEX ASTM D4318 5532 MOISTURE CONTENT LIFTS/MIN QTYFREQ QTY RATE AMOUNT 1 192 192 hr 566.00 512,672.00 1 12 12 day 52,016.00 524,192.00 1 12 12 trip $48.00 5576.00 1 1 100 100 ea $63.00 56,300.00 100 100 ea 516.00 $1,600.00 S3, SONS - FLEX BASE Composite Pi/LL EA - l per each 5502 ATI ERBERG LIMITS/PLASTICITY INDEX iwith Aggregate} ASTM D4318 1 70 70 ea $99.00 $6,930.00 01. INVESTIGATIVE ANALYSIS SUBTOTAL $52,270.00 01. LABORATORY LIFTS/MIN QTYFREQ QTY RATE AMOUNT P. PERSONNEL Admin Fee Protect Setup LS - Lump Sum P119 ADMINISTRATION FEE (1 time per project) Friday, January O6, 2017 1 1 1 Is 579.00 579.00 01. LABORATORY SUBTOTAL $79.00 Page 2 of 4 P010617A1 E16261 SPMP Fiscal Year 2017 IDIQ Street Overlays - East City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, TX Jeffrey Edmonds. P.E. 02. OVERLAY AND SEALCOAT REPAIRS A. ASPHALT HMAC Overlay LIFTS/MIN QTYFREQ QTY RATE AMOUNT A105 ASPHALT FULL SERIES 1 3 3 ea 5667.00 $2,001.00 A202 ASPHALT CORING/THICKNESS/DENSITY 1 9 9 ea 5104.00 5936.00 5191 SAMPLE PREPARATION CHARGE 1 3 3 hr $72.00 5216.00 5200 ROLLING PATTERN 1 50 50 hr 574.00 $3,700.00 CI. CONCRETE 1@7,31P23 0301.1 CONCRETE CYLINDERS (Min 4) 4 22 88 ea 547.00 54,136.00 0501 OBSERVATIONS (Pier, Rebar, Structural Steel, etc) 1 5 5 hr 591.00 5455.00 S399 CONCRETE CYLINDERS PICK UP FEE 1 22 22 pour $46.00 $1,012.00 M. MISCELLANEOUS Vehicle Fees for Densities, Material Sampling and Concrete Cylinders V486 VEHICLE Si. SOILS - SUBGRADE 1 32 32 trip 548.00 $1,536.00 5190 MATERIALS SAMPUNG CHARGE 1 5 5 ea 560.00 5300.00 5310 ATTERBERG LIMITS/PLASTICITY INDEX ASTM D4318 1 5 5 ea 563.00 5315.00 5510 PROCTOR -STANDARD ASTM 0698 1 5 5 ea 5226.00 51,130.00 5600-1 NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY MIN 3 (ASTM 06938) 1 24 24 ea $47.00 51,128.00 S3. SOILS - FLEX BASE S190 MATERIALS SAMPUNG CHARGE 1 4 4 ea 560.00 5240.00 5502 ATTER8ERG LIMITS/PLASTICITY INDEX (with Aggregate) ASTM 043113 1 4 4 ea 599.00 5396.00 5504 GRADATION (Sieve Analysis) 1 4 4 ea 599.00 $396.00 5522 PROCTOR- MODIFIED ASTM D1557 1 4 4 ea 5266.00 51,064.00 5546 WET BALL MILL 1 4 4 ea 5338.00 $1,352.00 5600-1 NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY MIN 3 (ASTM 06938) 1 49 49 ea $47.00 $2,303.00 Friday, January 06, 2017 02. OVERLAY AND SEALCOAT REPAIRS SUBTOTAL $22,616.00 Page 3 of 4 [EXHIBIT "A" 1 Page 3of4 GRAND TOTAL $74,965.00 Special Inspection such as REBAR INSPEC>•ION are not included In this proposal. Please contact us for a quote for these items if needed. Friday, January 06, 2017 Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT "A" Page 4 of 4 IEXHIBIT "B" I Page 1 of 6 TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO TESTING AGREEMENT ARTICLE 1. SERVICES: Lab will: 1.1 Provide only those services requested by City Engineer that, in the opinion of Lab, lie within the technical or professional areas of expertise of Lab and which Lab is adequately staffed and equipped to perform. 1.2 Perform technical services under the supervision of a licensed professional engineer and in compliance with the basic requirements of the appropriate standards of the American Society for Testing and Materials, where applicable, and other standards designated in writing by the City Engineer. 1.3 Promptly submit formal reports (printed and electronic copies) of tests, inspections and services performed indicating, where applicable, compliance with the Project specifications or other contract documents. Such reports must be complete and factual, citing the tests performed, methods employed, values obtained and parts of the structure of the Project area subjected to any testing. 1.4 Utilize testing equipment which has been calibrated according to applicable standards and, upon request, submit to the City Engineer or designee documentation of such calibration. Secure representative samples of those materials that the City's contractor proposes to use which require testing, together with relevant data concerning such materials including the point of origin and supplier. 1.5 Consider reports to be confidential and distribute reports only to those persons, organizations or agencies specifically designated in writing by the City Engineer. 1.6 Retain records relating to services performed for City for a period of two years following submission of any reports, during which period the records will be made available to the City at all reasonable times. 1.7 Pay salaries, wages, expenses, social security taxes, federal and state unemployment taxes and any other similar payroll taxes relating to the services. ARTICLE 2. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES: City Engineer or designee will: 2.1 Provide Lab with all plans, specifications, addenda, change orders, approved shop drawings and other information for the proper performance of services by Lab. 2.2 Issue authorization in writing giving Lab free access to the Project site and to all shops or yards where materials are prepared or stored. 2.3 Designate in writing those persons or firms which will act as the City's representative with respect to Lab's services to be performed under this Agreement and which must be promptly notified by Lab when it appears that materials tested or inspected are in non-compliance. Only the City Engineer or designee has authority to transmit instructions, receive information and data and/or interpret and define the City's policies and decisions with respect to the Project. Lab acknowledges that certain City representatives may have different types of authority concerning the Project. 2.4 Advise Lab sufficiently in advance of any operations so as to allow for assignment of personnel by Lab for completion of the required services. Such advance notice will be in accordance with that established by mutual agreement of the parties. 2.5 Direct the Project contractor, either by the Construction Contract or direct written order, to: (a) Stop work at the appropriate times for Lab to perform contracted services; (b) Fumish such labor and all facilities needed by Lab to obtain and handle samples at the Project and to facilitate the specified inspection and tests; (c) Provide and maintain for use of Lab adequate space at the Project for safe storage and proper curing of test specimens that must remain on the Project site prior to, during and up to 60 days after testing. ARTICLE 3. GENERAL CONDITIONS 3.1 Lab, by the performance of services covered hereunder, does not in any way assume, abridge or abrogate any of those duties, responsibilities or authorities with regard to the Project that, by custom or contract, are vested in the Project architects, design engineers or any other design agencies or authorities. 3.2 Lab is not authorized to supervise, alter, relax, enlarge or release any requirement of the Project specifications or other contract documents nor to approve or accept any portion of the work. Lab does not have the right of rejection or the right to stop the work. City Engineer will direct the Project contractor to stop work at appropriate times for Lab to conduct the sampling, testing or inspection of operations covered by the Agreement. ARTICLE 4. FIELD MONITORING AND TESTING 4.1 City and Lab agree that Lab will be on-site to perform inspections for contracted services. The City and Lab also agree that Lab will not assume responsibility for Project contractor's means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction, and it is understood that the final services provided by Lab will not relieve the Project contractor of its responsibilities for performing the work in accordance with the Project plans and specifications. For the purposes of this Agreement, the word "inspection" is used to mean periodic observation of the work and the conducting of tests by Lab as specified in the Agreement. Continuous monitoring by Lab or its subcontractors does not mean that Lab is approving placement of materials. Inspection is not and should not be construed to be a warranty by Lab to the City or any other party. 4.2 Samples collected or tested by Lab remain the property of the City while in the custody of the Lab. Lab will retain the samples for a period of 60 days following the date of submission of any report related to the sample. Following the retention period, Lab will dispose of non -hazardous samples, and return hazardous, acutely toxic or radioactive samples and samples' containers and residues to City. City agrees to accept such samples and samples' containers. ARTICLE 5. STANDARD OF CARE AND WARRANTY Services performed by Lab will be conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the same locality. No other warranty either expressed or implied is made or intended by the Agreement or any reports. Lab will not be responsible for the interpretation or use by others of data developed by Lab. ARTICLE 6. INDEMNIFICATION Lab shall fully indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi and its officials, officers, agents, employees, or other entity, excluding the engineer or architect or that person's agent, employee or subconsultant, over which the City exercises control ("Indemnitee") from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, to the extent that the damage is caused by or results from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property infringement or failure to pay a IEXHIBIT "B" I Page 2 of 6 subcontractor or supplier committed by Lab or its agent, Lab under contract or another entity over which Lab exercises control while in the exercise of rights or performance of the duties under this agreement. This indemnification does not apply to any liability resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the City or its employees, to the extent of such negligence. Lab shall defend Indemnitee, with counsel satisfactory to the City Attorney, from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, if the claim is not based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee. If a claim is based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee, the Lab shall reimburse the City's reasonable attorney's fees in proportion to the Lab's liability. Lab must advise City in writing within 24 hours of any claim or demand against City or Lab known to Lab related to or arising out of Lab's activities under this Agreement. ARTICLE 7. INVOICES AND PAYMENT 7.1 Lab will submit progress invoices to City Engineer monthly and final invoice upon completion of services. Each invoice is due and payable by City within 30 days of receipt and approval to pay by the City Engineer. 7.2 All funding obligations of the City under this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of funds in its annual budget. ARTICLE 8. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 8.1 Lab must not commence work under this agreement until all required insurance has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Lab must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. 8.2 Lab must furnish to the Director of Engineering Services with the signed agreement (or amendment) a copy of the Certificate(s) of Insurance (COI) with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General Liability and Auto Liability policies, and a waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with COI. Project name and or number must be listed in Description Box of COI. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -written day notice of cancellation, required on all certificates or by applicable policy endorsements Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate EXHIBIT "B" Page 3 of 6 Commercial General Liability including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises — Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non -Owned 3. Rented/Leased $500,000 Combined Single Limit PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY (Errors and Omissions) $1,000,000 Per Claim (Defense costs must be outside policy limits) If claims made policy, retro date must be prior to inception of agreement, have extended reporting period provisions and identify any limitations regarding who is insured. 8.3 In the event of accidents of any kind related to this agreement, Lab must fumish the City with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. 8.4 Lab shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Lab's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no Tess than A- VII. Lab is required to provide City with renewal Certificates. 8.6 Lab shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Lab shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Engineering Services P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 8.7 Lab agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: (a) List the City and its officers, officials, employees, volunteers, and elected representatives as additional insured by endorsement, as respects operations, completed operation and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the professional liability/Errors & Omissions policy; (b) Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; and (c) Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation, non -renewal or material change in coverage, and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. EXHIBIT "B" Page4of6 8.8 Within five (5) calendar days of a suspension, cancellation, or non -renewal of coverage, Lab shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Lab's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 8.9 In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Lab's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Lab to remove the exhibit hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) if any, which become due to Lab hereunder until Lab demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. 8.10 Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Lab may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Lab's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this agreement. 8.11 It is agreed that Lab's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self-insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this agreement. 8.12 It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. ARTICLE 9. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT The City may, at any time, with or without cause, terminate this Agreement upon seven days written notice to Lab at the address of record. Lab will be compensated for services performed up to termination. ARTICLE 10. CONTROLLING LAW This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Texas without regard to its conflicts of laws. Venue for legal proceedings lie exclusively in Nueces County, Texas. ARTICLE 11. DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS 11.1 Lab agrees to comply with City of Corpus Christi Ordinance No. 17112 and complete the Disclosure of Interests form as part of this Agreement, if required. 11.2 Lab agrees to comply with section 2252.908 of the Texas Government Code and complete Form 1295 Certificate of Interested Parties as part of this Agreement, if required. For more information, please review the information on the Texas Ethics Commission website at https://www.ethics.state.tx.us. 11.3 Lab agrees to comply with Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Government Code and file Form CIO with the City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office, if required. For more information and to determine if you need to file a Form CIQ, please review the information on the City Secretary's website at htto://www.cctexas.com/govern ment/city-secretary/conflict-d isclosure/index. ARTICLE 12. CLAIMS 12.1 Claims arising from this Agreement shall be made in writing, sworn to and signed by an authorized representative. The responsibility to substantiate a claim rests with the party making the claim. 12.2 All negotiations pursuant to this Article are confidential and shall be treated as compromise and settlement negotiations for purposes of applicable rules of evidence. EXHIBIT "B" Page 5 of 6 ARTICLE 13. EXTENT OF AGREEMENT 13.1 This Agreement, including Exhibit "A" and these Terms and Conditions, represents the entire Agreement between City and Lab and supersedes all prior negotiation, representations or agreements, written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument signed by duly authorized representatives of City and Lab. If any conflict occurs between these Terms and Conditions and any other part of this Agreement, these Terms and Conditions are controlling. 13.2 In the event that any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, the remaining terms will be in full effect and this Agreement will be construed as if the invalid or unenforceable matters were never included in this Agreement. No waiver of any default will be a waiver of any future default. 13.3 Neither party will assign this Agreement without the express written approval of the other, but Lab may subcontract laboratory procedures as Lab deems necessary to meet the obligations of this Agreement. ARTICLE 14. SAFETY City and Lab agree that, in accordance with the generally accepted construction practice, the Project's general contractor will be solely and completely responsible for working conditions on the Project, including safety of all persons and property during the performance of the work and for compliance with all municipal, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, including OSHA. The duty of Lab in providing services is not, therefore, to include any review of, or responsibility for, the adequacy of the Project's general contractor's safety measures in, on or near the Project site. EXHIBIT "B" Page 6 of 6 Basic Services: Preliminary Phase Design Phase Bid Phase Report Phase Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Additional Services: Permitting Warranty Phase Inspection Platting Survey Reporting O & M Manuals SCADA Subtotal Additional Services Summary of Fees Basic Services Fees Additional Services Fees Total of Fees COMPLETE PROJECT NAME Project No. xxxxxx Invoice No. 12345 Invoice Date: Total Amount Previous Total Percent Contract Amd No. 1 Amd No. 2 Contract Invoiced Invoice Invoice Complete $15,117 $0 $0 $15,117 $0 $1,000 $1,000 7% 20,818 0 0 20,818 1,000 500 1,500 7% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n/a 14,166 0 0 14,166 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 On/a $50,101 $0 $0 $50,101 $750 $1,500 $2,500 5% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n/a 9,011 0 0 9,011 0 0 0 0% 29,090 0 0 29,090 0 0 0 0% 1,294 0 0 1,294 0 0 0 0% TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 0% TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 0% $39,395 $0 $0 $39,395 $0 $0 $0 0% $50,101 $0 $0 $50,101 $750 $1,500 $2,500 5% 39,395 0 0 39,395 0 0 0 0% $89,496 $0 $0 $89,496 $750 $1,500 $2,500 3% riti4at CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST City of Christi City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definitions. COMPANY NAME: Rock Engineering & Testing Laboratory, Inc. P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: 6817 Leopard Street FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 4. Association E CITY: Corpus Christi ZIP: 78409 2. Partnership 5. Other 3. Sole Owner ❑ DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each `employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm.' Name Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Committee Board, Commission or 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Consultant FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Roetta C. Rock, President for Certifying Person: Curtis A. Rock Title: Chief Onerating Officer (Type or Print) Signature of Certifying ii4. Vl e Person: DEFINITIONS Date: January 9, 2017 a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. g. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2017-152350 Date Filed: 01/10/2017 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Rock Engineering and Testing Laboratory, Inc. Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E16261 West SPMP 2017 Construction Materials Engineering 4 Name of Interested PartyState, Country(place of business) City, Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. X 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. ,"'i,"",% ANDREA B. CANTU s°. t •.`a : Notary Public. State of Texas :,':�..-:7F..-Comm. Expires 05-10-2020 '',-Fo',,os Notary ID 124920504 1 • business entity Signature of authorized agent of contracting AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE n F Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said Q6� j\am,� ` - , this the \ V day of �,7 , 20 1 1 , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. (6Att Ancireaq-3.C6r\--bA guiroo,-4 cco Signature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us version vi.u. AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2016 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of January 31, 2016 DATE: January 6, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Dan Grimsbo, Interim Director of Water Utilities (361) 826-1689, DanG@cctexas.com Resolution approving the Wastewater Management Plan CAPTION: Resolution approving the City of Corpus Christi Wastewater Management Plan Final Report ("Final Report") regarding options for improvements to the City's wastewater treatment plants ("WWTPs") and adopting Option 4D as stated in the Final Report which provides for following key infrastructure components: (1) construction of a new 12 million gallons per day (MGD) wastewater treatment facility at a new site ("New WWTP") with recommended location in the area between the current Allison and Greenwood WWTPs; (2) consolidation of existing wastewater flows at two WWTPs: the New WWTP and an upgraded and expanded 20 MGD plant on the Oso WWTP site, with Broadway and Whitecap WWTPs to remain in service for foreseeable future; and (3) decommissioning of the Allison, Laguna Madre, and Greenwood WWTPs. PURPOSE: To approve the Wastewater Management Plan Final Report regarding comprehensive improvements to the City's wastewater treatment plants. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The City owns and operates six (6) wastewater treatment facilities. Four of the plants (Allison, New Broadway, Oso, and Greenwood) are located in the main part of the city, one (Laguna Madre) is located on and services the Flour Bluff area, and one (Whitecap) is located on Padre Island. The overall objective of the Wastewater Management Plan is to determine the optimal long- range wastewater treatment plant operating scenario. The optimal strategy will support treatment plant environmental compliance while remaining sensitive to the impact to rate payers from recommended improvements. One of the primary reasons for conducting this study was to confirm the potential benefits of consolidating flows from the six plants into a lesser number of newer larger treatment plants. ALTERNATIVES: Council may choose not to approve the resolution OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This item conforms to City Policies. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Water Utilities FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital X Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): n/a Comments: None. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution as submitted. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution, Wastewater Management Plan, Presentation Resolution approving the City of Corpus Christi Wastewater Management Plan Final Report ("Final Report") regarding options for improvements to the City's wastewater treatment plants ("WWTPs") and adopting Option 4D as stated in the Final Report which provides for following key infrastructure components: (1) construction of a new 12 million gallons per day (MGD) wastewater treatment facility at a new site ("New WWTP") with recommended location in the area between the current Allison and Greenwood WWTPs; (2) consolidation of existing wastewater flows at two WWTPs: the New WWTP and an upgraded and expanded 20 MGD plant on the Oso WWTP site, with Broadway and Whitecap WWTPs to remain in service for foreseeable future; and (3) decommissioning of the Allison, Laguna Madre, and Greenwood WWTPs NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City Council for the City of Corpus Christi, Texas approves the Final Report of the Corpus Christi Wastewater Management Plan, regarding options for improvements to the City's Wastewater Treatment Plants. A copy of the Final Report is attached to this Resolution. Section 2. That the City Council adopts the Final Report's Option 4D which involves the consolidation of existing plant flows at two treatment plant sites: a new north plant site and an expanded and upgraded plant on the current Oso plant site. Allison, Laguna Madre and Greenwood WWTPs would be taken out of service under this option and Broadway and Whitecap WWTPs would stay in service for the foreseeable future with possible consolidation at a later time. The key infrastructure components for Option 4D are identified in the Final Report as follows: 1) construction of a new 12 million gallons per day (MGD) wastewater treatment facility at a new site ("New WWTP") with recommended location in the area between the current Allison and Greenwood WWTPs; (2) consolidation of existing wastewater flows at two treatment plant sites: the New WWTP site and an expanded and upgraded 20 MGD plant on the Oso WWTP site, with Broadway and Whitecap WWTPs to remain in service for foreseeable future; and (3) decommissioning of the Allison, Laguna Madre, and Greenwood WWTPs. This Resolution shall be and become effective immediately upon and after its adoption and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Dan McQueen Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas of The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Dan McQueen Rudy Garza Paulette Guajardo Michael Hunter Joe McComb Ben Molina Lucy Rubio Greg Smith Carolyn Vaughn November 2016 Stantec Prepared for: City of Corpus Christi Prepared by: Stantec Consutling Services Inc. in association with LNV, Inc. - Bath Engineering - CR&G - Kailo Communications Sudio - TischlerBise `.■may Stantec Sign -off Sheet This document entitled City of Corpus Christi Wastewater Management Plan was prepared by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. ("Stantec") for the account of the City of Corpus Christi (the "Client"). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec's professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which athird party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by Rob Simm, PhD Reviewed by Ashok Varma, PE Sig ure ka& �' Tisch er ise November 2016 Sign -off Sheet Stantec LN/ Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Recommendation 1 Project Approach 2 Develop Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 2 Project Risks and Evaluation of Delivery Methods 4 1.0 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 8 1.1. Current Wastewater System Configurations and Operations 9 1.2. Future Requirements 24 1.3. Stakeholders and Stakeholder Input 30 1.4. Summary of Existing Constraints 32 1.5. Identification of the Preferred Wastewater Servicing Option 34 2.0 Implementation Phasing Plan 64 2.1. Introduction 64 2.2. Project Risk Assessment 67 2.3. Proposed Implementation Plan and Project Delivery 69 2.4. Interim Operations Plan 75 2.5. Stakeholder Management Plan 77 3.0 Implementation Programming Schedule 78 3.1. Introduction 78 3.2. Project Implementation Triggers 78 3.3. Proposed Program Implementation Schedule 79 3.4. Risk Management Plan 79 3.5. Fund Requirement Schedule 81 Table of Contents November 2016 R c kailo'` TischlerBise LNV Stantec List of Tables Table ES -1 Key Infrastructure Requirements for recommended Option 4D 1 Table ES -2 Wastewater Servicing Options 2 Table ES -3 Key Project Elements and Associated Critical Implementation Risks 4 Table ES -4 Summary of Fund Requirements 7 Table 1-1 Permit Limits for Existing Allison WWTP 10 Table 1-2 Permit Limits for New Broadway WWTP 11 Table 1-3 Permit Limits for Greenwood WWTP 12 Table 1-4 Permit Limits for Laguna Madre WWTP 14 Table 1-5 Permit Limits for Oso WRP 14 Table 1-6 Permit Limits for Whitecap WWTP 15 Table 1-7 Monthly DMRs for 2014 and 2015 16 Table 1-8 Physical Condition Ratings and Descriptions 17 Table 1-9 Summary of Required Upgrade Costs by Facility 18 Table 1-10 Overall Staffing Benchmarking 19 Table 1-11 Overall Power Benchmarking ($/MG Treated) 20 Table 1-12 Overall Power Benchmarking (kWh/MG) 20 Table 1-13 Typical Process Energy Usage in a Wastewater Treatment Facility 20 Table 1-14 Overall Chemical Cost Benchmark ($/MG Treated) 20 Table 1-15 Summary of Benchmarking Results by Facility 21 Table 1-16 Projected Growth by Existing Sewer Service Area 25 Table 1-17 Projected Population by Sewer Service Area 25 Table 1-18 Flow Projection by Service Area (MGD) - High 26 Table 1-19 Flow Projection by Service Area (MGD) - Low 26 Table 1-20 Current Facility Capacities Now and in 2035 27 Table 1-21 Anticipated Future Nutrient Removal Requirements 28 Table 1-22 Anticipated Biosolids Management Approach 29 Table 1-23 Anticipated Resource Recovery Systems 30 Table 1-24 Stakeholder Engagement Meetings 31 Table 1-25 Site Capacity of Existing Wastewater Treatment Plants 32 Table 1-26 Summary of Key Constraints and Approach to Addressing These 33 Table 1-27 Wastewater Servicing Options 36 Table 1-28 Summary of Infrastructure Requirements for Option 1 38 Table 1-29 Proposed Unit Operations for New 10 MGD Greenwood WWTP 38 Table 1-30 Summary of Infrastructure Requirements under Option 2A 39 Table 1-31 Proposed Unit Operations for New 12 MGD Allison WWTP 40 Table 1-32 Proposed Unit Operations for new 20 MGD Laguna Madre WWTP 40 Table 1-33 Summary of Infrastructure Requirements under Option 2B 41 Table 1-34 Summary of Infrastructure Requirements under Option 3A 43 Table 1-35 Proposed Unit Operations for New 32 MGD North Site WWTP 43 Table 1-36 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 3B 45 11 a rrh C R G kaiak Tisch &use November 2016 List of Tables Stantec LNV Table 1-37 Proposed Unit Operations for New 35 MGD Southwest WWTP 45 Table 1-38 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 3C 47 Table 1-39 Proposed Unit Operations for new 32 MGD Southeast Treatment Plant 47 Table 1-40 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 4A 48 Table 1-41 Proposed Unit Operations for new North WWTP under Option 4A 49 Table 1-42 Proposed Unit Operations for New Laguna Madre WWTP under Option 4A 49 Table 1-43 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 4B 50 Table 1-44 Proposed Unit Operations for Proposed Southwest Treatment Plant under Option 4B 51 Table 1-45 Proposed Unit Operations for Laguna Madre WWTP under Option 4B 51 Table 1-46 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 4C 52 Table 1-47 Proposed Unit Operations for New 12 MGD North Plant under Option 4C 53 Table 1-48 Proposed Unit Operations for New 20 MGD Southeast Plant Under Option 4C 53 Table 1-49 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 4D 54 Table 1-50 Proposed Unit Operations for 12 MGD New Plant under Option 4D 55 Table 1-51 Summary of Capital and O&M Costs by Option 57 Table 1-52 Difference in O&M Cost between Servicing Options for Various Labor Inflation Rates 57 Table 1-53 Difference in O&M Costs between Options for Various Power Inflation Rates 58 Table 1-54 Supplemental Wastewater User Rate Calculations 58 Table 1-55 Evaluation Criteria and Weighting Factors used for Options Evaluation 59 Table 1-56 Key Infrastructure Requirements for recommended Option 4D 63 Table 2-1 Preliminary Risk Matrix 68 Table 2-2 Comparison of Project Delivery Options - Value for Money and Increased Cost 72 Table 2-3 Examples of Recent Alternative Delivery Water Projects in Texas 74 Table 2-4 Key Project Elements and Associated Critical Implementation Risks 74 Table 2-5 Preliminary Recommendation on Staffing Levels by Employment Category 76 Table 3-1 Program Implementation Schedule 79 Table 3-2 Potential Alternative Strategies 80 Table 3-3 Summary of Fund Requirements 81 List of Tables November 2016 CTischlerase • pij t ry R LNV Stantec List of Figures Figure ES -1 General Configuration of Preferred Alternative 1 Figure ES -2 Options Evaluation Matrix 5 Figure 1-1 Service Area Boundary of Six Existing Wastewater Treatment Plants 9 Figure 1-2 Aerial Photo of Existing Allison WWTP 10 Figure 1-3 Aerial Photo of ExistingBroadwayWWTP 11 Figure 1-4 Aerial Photo of Existing Greenwood WWTP 11 Figure 1-5 Aerial Photo of Existing Laguna Madre WWTP 13 Figure 1-6 Aerial Photo of Existing Oso WRP 14 Figure 1-7 Aerial Photo of Existing Whitecap WWTP 15 Figure 1-8 Population Projections for the City of Corpus Christi (2020 to 2070) 24 Figure 1-9 Option 1 System Configuration 37 Figure 1-10 Option 2A System Configuration 39 Figure 1-11 Option 2B System Configuration 41 Figure 1-12 Option 3A System Configuration 42 Figure 1-13 Option 3B System Configuration 44 Figure 1-14 Option 3C System Configuration 46 Figure 1-15 Option 4A System Configuration 48 Figure 1-16 Option 4B System Configuration 50 Figure 1-17 Option 4C System Configuration 52 Figure 1-18 Option 4D System Configuration 54 Figure 1-19 Options Evaluation Matrix 60 Figure 1-20 System Configuration of Recommended Option - Option 4D 62 Figure 2-1 Conceptual Site Plan for New North Treatment Plant 64 Figure 2-2 Greenwood Pumping Station Site Plan 65 Figure 2-3 Preliminary Layout for Upgraded and Expanded Oso WRP 65 Figure 2-4 Potential Force Main Routing for Flow Diversion from McBride Lift Station to Broadway WWTP 66 Figure 2-5 Potential Force Main Routing for Flow Diversion from Arcadia Lift Station to Broadway WWTP 66 Figure 2-6 Relative Risk Transfer with Various Alternative Delivery Approaches 73 Figure 2-7 The Project Triangle - Anticipated Number of Bidders for Various Project Delivery Approaches 73 Figure 3-1 Alternative Option 4E 80 C R G G kaiak Tisch &use November 2016 List of Figures Stantec LN/ Abbreviations ADF Average Dry Weather Flow AS Activated Sludge BOD5 5 -day Biochemical Oxygen Demand CBOD5 5 -day Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand CHP Combined heat and power CIP Capital Improvement Plan CMAR Construction Manager at Risk DAF Dissolved Air Floatation DB Design -Build DBM Design -Build -Maintain DBO Design -Build -Operate DMR Discharge Monitoring Report DP Design Professional FAF Facility Assessment Form FTE Full time equivalents GIS Geographical Information System GMP Guaranteed Maximum Price GPCD Gallons per capita day MGD Million gallons per day MLSS Mixed liquor suspended solids NACWA National Association of Clean Water Agencies NPDES National Pollution Discharge Elimination System O&M Operations and Maintenance OPC Opinion of Probable Cost PDB Progressive Design Build P3 Public -Private -Partnership QBS Qualifications Based Selection RAS Return Activated Sludge SRT Solids Retention Time SSO Sanitary Sewer Overflow TCEQ Texas Commission on Environmental Quality TN Total Nitrogen TP Total Phosphorus TSS Total Suspended Solids TWDB Texas Water Development Board TSWQS Texas Surface Water Quality Standards USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency UV Ultraviolet Disinfection WAS Waste Activated Sludge WRP Water Reclamation Plant W W TP Wastewater Treatment Plant Abbrevlatlons November 2016 LNV Stantec Executive Summary Recommendation Based on the analysis outlined within this report, it is recommended that the City of Corpus Christi (City) adopt Option 4D for their Wastewater Management Plan. The configuration of this preferred option is presented in Figure ES -1 and the primary elements summarized in Table ES -1. Figure ES -1 General Configuration of Preferred Alternative ( ) New Treatment Plant • Close Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant O Expand Treatment Plant —> Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline —>p /////://, —> 14. J Table ES -1 Key Infrastructure Requirements for recommended Option 4D Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Repair over next 10 years • Decommission the plant after 10 -years and build new pumping station to direct flows to the new North treatment plant. North Treatment Plant • Construct a new 12 MGD facility at the North treatment plant site in the next 5 years. • Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to the new North treatment plant site. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years Oso • Repair plant over next 20 years • Upgrade plant to BNR and expand to 20 MGD over next 5 years. Laguna Madre • Repair the existing plant over the next 5 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Laguna Madre plant to transfer wastewater from Laguna Madre to the Oso treatment plant. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years Path C R G kaiakTisch &use November 2016 Executive Summary 1 Stantec LNV Project Approach The overall objective of this project is to determine the optimal long-range wastewater treatment plant, consolidation and trunk sewer pumping scenario. The optimal strategy will support treatment plant environmental compliance while remaining sensitive to the impact to rate payers from recommended improvements. After determining the optimal strategy, the City wishes to develop an improvements implementation plan elaborating logical project limits for procurement, project sequencing, and overall program schedule and budgets for each element. The project plan was developed under three phases as follows: • Phase 1- Develop an optimal wastewater treatment configuration • Phase 2 - Develop an implementation phasing plan • Phase 3 - Develop an implementation programming schedule Develop Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration The City of Corpus Christi presently owns and operates six (6) wastewater treatment facilities. Four of the plants (Allison WWTP, New Broadway WWTP, Oso WRP, and Greenwood WWTP) are located in the main part of the city, one (Laguna Madre WWTP) is located on and services the Flour Bluff area, and one (Whitecap WWTP) is located on Padre Island. One of the primary reasons for conducting this study was to confirm the potential benefits of consolidating flows from the six existing wastewater treatment facilities into a lesser number of newer larger treatment plants. The unit operating costs for larger wastewater treatment plants tend to be lower than for smaller facilities. This is primarily due to reduced staffing levels, measured as full-time equivalents (FTEs) per million gallon (MG) treated, and lower unit power costs measured as kilowatt hours (kW -hr) per million gallon treated that decline with increasing plant capacity. Ten consolidation options were evaluated for this study, as summarized in Table ES -2. Table ES -2 Wastewater Servicing Options Category Description Options 1- Maintain all Existing Plant sites • Keep six sites. Replace Greenwood on same site. Continue with current operations and planned maintenance. • 1- Maintain Existing Sites 2 - Consolidate at Existing Plant sites • Keep Broadway & Whitecap. • Consolidate remainder at two of the existing plant sites. • 2A - Allison + Laguna Madre • 2B Allison + Oso 3 - Consolidate at New Plant site • Keep Broadway & Whitecap. • Consolidate remainder at one new plant site. • 3A - North site • 3B - Southwest site • 3C - Southeast site 4 - Combination of New and Existing sites • Keep Broadway & Whitecap. • Consolidate remainder at two sites with at least one new site plus an existing site. • 4A - North + Laguna Madre • 4B - Southwest + Laguna Madre • 4C - North + Southeast • 4D - North + Oso 2 Executive Summary November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBise The city is facing an estimated sustaining capital spend at the six existing wastewater treatment facilities of approximately $220 M. The majority of the capital requirements are for the Greenwood (approximately $61 M) and Oso (approximately $81 M) facilities. The contributing sewer shed for these two plants is also where the majority of anticipated demand growth is expected to occur. The 2016 capital improvement plan is for an estimated capital spend to 2035 of approximately $524 M and results in utility rates that are considered unaffordable based upon EPA affordability criteria. User rate increases are driven in large part by increases in capital spend. The increase in capital spending can be partly offset by reductions in annual operation and maintenance (O&M) spend. Options requiring a large upfront capital spend over the next 5 to 10 years will have a significant further negative impact upon wastewater user rates if not offset by O&M cost efficiencies. The implementation of any of the options presented in this report needs to strike the appropriate balance between minimizing the sustaining capital spend on existing facilities destined to be taken out of service and consolidating existing facilities as soon as practical in order to realize annual O&M savings associated with economies of scale, while staging planned capital spending for new facilities in order to minimize the impact upon user rates. The best way to assess the options under consideration was to construct a detailed cash flow model for each. The consulting team constructed detailed capital and O&M cost models for each of the ten options considered for this study. All of the options were compared against Option 1- Maintain existing six plant sites, which was treated as the benchmark. The team then conducted sensitivity analyses on each of the options considered to determine how changing conditions might impact costs as well as the recommended servicing option. The financial analysis suggests Option 1- Maintain the six existing plant sites has the lowest overall capital cost associated with treatment and pumping infrastructure given that it takes maximum advantage of existing infrastructure. However, Option 1 has the highest O&M costs of the options considered. Option 1 also has the highest capital cost for industrial reuse water given reuse water would likely have to be provided from two treatment plants as opposed to one under other options, which renders no significant user rate savings. Rath C R r<r G kaiak use LNV ® Stantec The cost analyses suggest Options 2B and 4D are competitive with Option 1 from an overall cost perspective considering capital costs for treatment and reuse as well as cumulative O&M costs. The relative impact on user rates for options 1, 2B, and 4D is essentially equal. Option 3A, which has the highest cumulative capital cost of the options considered, would have a statistically significant impact on user rates relative to the Option 1 benchmark. Sensitivity analysis demonstrates that the difference in O&M cost savings is most sensitive to labor costs and labor cost inflation. The consolidation options each result in significant staff reductions relative to the bench mark Option 1 even after optimizing existing plant operations. Higher future labor costs and increased labor inflation will favor the consolidation options, particularly options 2B and 4D, relative to the benchmark (Option 1). Prior to evaluating the Options, the City staff and their consultant team engaged with the citizens and other stakeholders to hear what issues and concerns needed to be considered in selecting the optimum future wastewater configuration. As can be expected, there was a wide range of opinions expressed by the general public, neighborhood associations, agencies, business professionals and other interested parties. These issues of concern were then grouped into preliminary evaluation criteria to cover the Economic, Social, Natural and Technical environments. The preliminary criteria were presented to City staff at an evaluation workshop where the team could confirm that these fully covered the range of relevant issues and also establish the relative priorities. Three priority levels and associated weightings were proposed: normal items were unweighted (level 1), important items were given a double weighting (level 2) and the most critical items were given a triple weighting (level 3). Having established the evaluation criteria, each of the 10 Options was evaluated using a qualitative five -point scale that ranged from strongly negative to strongly positive with a neutral midpoint level. It should be emphasized that the evaluation is subjective in nature and seeks to determine the relative performance or predicted impact under each criteria of an option as compared to the performance or impact of the other servicing options. To reinforce that the evaluation is qualitative in nature, symbols rather than numbers were used to represent the "score" under each criterion. The evaluation of the ten options are presented here in Figure ES -2. Based on this evaluation, the highest ranked wastewater servicing configuration (identified as 4D) is to consolidate future wastewater treatment around two main facilities - a new North plant and the existing Oso plant. It should be noted that this evaluation was based on assumptions of future water quality effluent standards which will still need to be verified. November 2016 Executive Summary 3 Stantec LNV Project Risks and Evaluation of Delivery Methods The key project elements associated with implementation of the preferred configuration (Option 4D) along with the key implementation risks are summarized here in Table ES -3. Rehabilitation and small upgrade projects identified in the physical condition survey would likely be delivered under traditional Design Bid Build (DBB) delivery or some form of job order contracting (JOC) arrangement. Table ES -3 Key Project Elements and Associated Critical Implementation Risks Project Time Frame Estimated Cost ($M) Key Risk Elements Oso WRP BNR upgrade and Expansion 0-5 year $72 M • Constructability associated with existing plant • Impact of construction on existing plant operations. • Inability to secure discharge permit. • Higher cost due to unforeseen circumstances. • Estimated operations cost savings not achieved. Greenwood PS and Force main 0-5 year $73 M • Ability to secure required easements for force main. • Delay in PS and force main construction delays flow transfer to North plant and increases Greenwood WWTP sustaining capital spend. • Traffic impacts during construction. • Flooding of construction site. Laguna Madre PS and Force main 6-10 year $18 M • Ability to get permit for Oso Bay pipeline crossing. • Securing required easements for force main. • Traffic impacts during construction. New North WWTP 0-5 year $103 M • Ability to secure suitable project site. • Delay in getting effluent discharge permit for new plant. • New plant construction not completed on time resulting in additional sustaining capital spend at Greenwood. • Greenwood PS and force main not ready in time to commission new plant. • Operations cost savings not attained post construction. Allison PS and Force main 11-15 years $22 M • Securing required easements for force main. • Traffic impacts during construction. A multi criteria analysis (MCA) was conducted to confirm the best delivery method for each project. Based on this analysis, recommended delivery methods are as follows: • Laguna Madre PS and Force Main - Design -Bid -Build (DBB) • Alison PS and Force Main - Design -Bid -Build (DBB) • Greenwood PS and Force Main - Design -Build (DB) • New North WWTP - Design -Build -Operate (DBO) • Oso WRP BNR Upgrade and Expansion - Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) • Industrial Reuse - Public Private Partnership (P3) 4 Executive Summary November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBise LNV ® Stantec Figure ES -2 Options Evaluation Matrix U Sub -Topic 1 _ — 2A _— 2B __� �= -'� 3A __— 3B 3C 4A 4B — 4C __— 4D ___ Total Capital Cost Strongly positive —capital cost less than$800M Neutral -mid levelcapital cost of$900M to $1,000M Positive -capital iri cost lessthan $900M Negative -capital fi)costmorethan $1,000M Negative -capital costmorethan $1,000M Negative -capital fi)costmorethan $1,000M Neutral -mid level capital cost of$900M to $1,000M Neutral -mid levelcapital cost of$900M to $1,000M Neutral -mid level capital cost of$900M to $1,000M Positive - capital 46 cost less than $900M Total O&M Cost Negative -high level O&M cost morethan$550M Neutral- mid 4-_)levelO&M cost of $525M to $550M Strongly positive- • low O&M cost less than$500M Neutral- mid 4-_)levelO&M cost of $525M to $550M Neutral -mid o level O&M cost of $525M to $550M Neutral- mid o levelO&M cost of $525M to $550M Positive -lower 1) O&M cost of $500M to $525M Neutral- mid 1) levelO&M cost of $525M to $550M Neutral -mid 1) level O&M cost of $525M to $550M Strongly positive - • low O&M cost less than$500M Cash Flow Strongly positive- • max annual spend of approx $100M Neutral -max O annual spend of approx$200M Neutral -max O annual spend of approx$200M Negative -max O annual spend of approx$250M Negative -max O annual spend of approx$250M Negative -max O annual spend of approx$250M Negative -max O annual spend of approx$250M Strongly negative 0-maxannual $30 dl�ofapprox Strongly negative 0-maxannual $30ndI�ofapprox Neutral -max O annual spend of approx$200M Maintaining base flow Neutral -keeps O ll flows at status quo dr) Negative -reduce flows to Oso Bay Neutral -keeps O criticalflows at status quo dr) Negative -reduce flows to Oso Bay Strongly negative O - reduce flow to Oso Bay, increase to Oso Creek O Negative -reduce flows to Oso Bay ONegative -reduce flows to Oso Bay Strongly negative O - reduce flows to Oso Bay, increase to Oso Creek ONegative -reduce flows to Oso Bay Neutral -keeps O criticalflows at status quo Effluent requirements Negative - continues challenges in Oso Bay and Nueces River Neutral- continues challenges in NuecesRiver Negative- continues © challenges in Oso Bay and Nueces giver Positive -allows 46 lower treatment requirements Neutral- continues challenges in Oso Creek Neutral- continues challenges in Oso Creek Positive -allows lower treatment requirements Neutral- continues challenges in Oso Creek Positive -allows lower treatment requirements Neutral- lower treatment in north, challenges inOso Bay Local eco systems Neutral -keeps status quo Negative- 4' potentialimpact at Blind Oso from loss of flow Neutral -keeps status quo Negative- potentialimpact at Blind Oso from loss of flow Negative- ON potentialimpact at Blind Osofrom loss of flow Negative- potentialimpact at Blind Oso from loss of flow Negative- ON potentialimpact at Blind Osofrom loss of flow Negative- potentialimpact at Blind Oso from loss of flow Negative - ON potentialimpact at Blind Osofrom loss of flow Neutral -keeps status quo Phasing potential Positive -can � proceed with multiple projects atone time Neutral- can 4) proceed at two sites and with pipelines Neutral- can � proceed at two sites and with pipelines Negative- requires all fp projects robe completed at same time Negative- requires all projects to be completed at sametime Negative - requires all projects robe completed at same time Neutral- can � proceed at two sites and with pipelines Neutral- can 4) proceed at two sites and with pipelines Neutral- can � proceed at two sites and with pipelines Neutral- can 4) proceed at two sites and with pipelines Immediate start to work Neutral- challenges at Oso, remainder available Positive - can dop work adjacent toboth existing plants Neutral- challenges at Oso, remainder available Negative or, -requires acquisition of land Negative 4- - requires acquisition of land Positive - can work independently on new plant Negative 4- - requires acquisition of land Negative - requires acquisition of land Negative 4- - requires acquisition of land Negative - requires acquisitiona land and working at Oso u c kaio ^ Tschler�is, Legend 0 O C 6 • Strongly Negative Neutral Positive Strongly Negative Positive 1 November 2016 ® Stantec LNv 15'.rn S2 U Sub -Topic 1 _�` 2A ht aq„�: __� 2B t$ Afiv.'!- _— - 3A _— ... 3B t ...0 .fiyir` __ 'Negative 3C t 44¢lr_ _= ��' 4A ._.- _ 4B _ 4C — 4D Neighboring g g land use Neutral -.w coatraue residential conflicts at Oso and Greenwood Positive u � sites with good buffers Neutral- continuesCentrales c r esideatial conflicts at Oso Stroaglypositive • -new plant in industrial area newr © plaatmgeaerally residential area Negative -new © plaatmgeaerally residential area Positive � sites withgood buffers Negative -new © plant in generally residential area Neutral- Continues 0 residential conflicts at Oso and Greenwood Neutral-` 0 r esideatial conflicts at Oso Land ownership Positive -no new tio land required for 20 years Strongly positive _ no new land • required for >30 years Strongly positive _ no new land • required for >30 years Negative -land O required for new plant Strongly negative -new O laadrequiredia residential area Strongly positive _ nonewland • required for >30 years Negative -land O requiredfornew plant Negative -land O requiredfor new plant Negative -land O requiredfornew plant Negative -land O requiredfor new plant Existingis impacts Neutral- continues status quo Positive -removes impac at Greenwood and Oso Neutral- Continues C impacts at Oso Positive -removes impac is at Greenwood and Oso Neutral- pac 0 continuesim is atOso Creek Neutral- impacts 0 continuesim is atOso Creek Positive removes tsatOso impacts Creek Neutral- impacts 0 continuesim is atOso Creek Neutral- pac 0 continuesim is atOso Creek Neutral- impacts 0 continuesim is atOso Creek Flooding potential Negative - O requires new flood wall at Greenwood Positive - removes impact from flooding at Oso Creek Positive - removes Au impact from flooding at Oso Creek Positive - removes Au impact from flooding at Oso Creek Neutral -requires O additionalflood protection along Oso Creek Neutral -requires O additionalflood protection along Oso Creek Positive - removes Au impact from flooding at Oso Creek Neutral -requires O additionalflood protection along Oso Creek Neutral -requires O additionalflood protection along Oso Creek Positive - removes Au impact from flooding at Oso Creek 0 Restoration 0 requirements posii Strongly poewOe -mini pipelines required fp Negative -new pipelines required Negative -new pipelines required Strongly negative -requires O extensive pipeline construction Strongly negative requires O extensive pipeline construction Strongly negative -requires O extensive pipeline construction Negative -new O pipehaes re quiredtt) Negative -new pipehaes re quired Negative -new pipehaes re quiredtt) Negative -new pipehaes required Traffic disruption Strongly positive • -minimalnew pipelines required Neutral- new pipelines is generally open areas Neutral- new pipelines in generally open areas Negative- O pipelines cross built up areas Negative- O pipelines cross built up areas Negative- O pipelines cross built up areas Neutral- new pipehnesin generally open areas Neutral- new pfpehnesin generally open areas Negative- O pipelines cross built up areas Neutral- new pfpehnesin generally open areas Potentialfor Reuse Negative- Long distance Oto servicing industry Positive -Allison 46 plantcloseto industry Positive - Allison 46 plant close to industry Strongly positive- • North plant close to industry Negative- Long distance Oto servicing industry Strongly negative -Longest distance Oto servicing industry Positive - North plant close to industry Negative - Long distance Oto servicing industry Positive - North plant close to industry Positive - North 46 plantcloseto industry Servicing new Development Negative - needs O se e growthne Neutral -requires expansion of o pumping and plant Neutral -requires expansion of 0 pumping and plant Neutral -requires expansion of 0 pumping and plant Strongly positive •reewcplantto • -closetonew growth Strongly positive • -closetonew growth Positive -can readily provide capacity for new growth Strongly positive • -closetonew growth Strongly positive • -closetonew growth Positive -can readily provide capacity for new growth - Efficiency of O&M Strongly negative continues O operations at 6 sites Neutral- consolidate to two m main plants, one new Neutral- consolidate to two m main plants, one new Strongly positive- • consolidate to one main new plant Strongly positive- • consolidate to one main new plant Strongly positive- • consolidate to one main plant Positive - consolidate to two W main plants, both new Positive - consolidate to two W aia plants, both new Positive - consolidate to two W main plants, both new Neutral - consolidate to two main plants, one new Flexibility forfuture consolidation Negative O-doesnot facilitatefuture consolidation Neutral- can c consolidate Whitecap burner Broadway Neutral- can c consolidate Wlsstecap but not Broadway Neutral- can c consolidate Broadwaybutaot Whitecap Negative O-doesnot facilitatefuture consolidation Neutral- can c consolidate Whitecap burner Broadway Positive - can 46 consolidateboth Wlsstecap and Broadway Neutral- can o consolidate Whitecap burner Broadway Positive - can 46 consolidateboth Wlsstecap and Broadway Positive - can 46 consolidateboth Whitecap and Broadway Overall Rating 102 101 104 95 78 86 100 84 92 106 November 2016 DIU halo 'n iischl r�7s LNV ® Stantec The estimated cash flow requirements for the recommended servicing plan are summarized here in Table ES -4. All capital costs are presented here in 2016 constant dollars. The capital spend by project and year is included with the cash flow models presented in Appendix K. Table ES -4 Summary of Fund Requirements Program Element Collection System Upgrades Associated with Reducing Overflows Implementation Time Frame 0-5 yr. 6-10 yr. 11-15 yr. 16-20 yr. $127 M $127 M $127 M Allison WWTP Repair and Rehab $13 M $4 M Allison PS and Force main $22 M Broadway WWTP Repair and Rehab $11 M $3 M $1 M Oso WRP Repair and Rehab $54 M $3 M $6 M $18 M Oso WRP BNR Upgrade & Expansion $72 M Greenwood Repair and Rehab $14 M Greenwood PS and Force main $73 M Laguna Madre Repair and Rehab $7 M Laguna Madre PS and Force main $18 M New North WWTP $103M Whitecap WWTP Repair and Rehab $19 M $2 M $2 M TOTALS $493 M $155 M $157 M $21 M The total estimated capital spend for Option 4D is approximately $826 M with O&M savings over the next 30 -years of approximately $60 M relative to the benchmark option of maintaining the six existing wastewater treatment plants. Path C R kalio "` TischlerSise G November 2016 Executive Summary 7 Optimal Wastewater Tre Configuration `NV Stantec 1.0 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration The overall objective of this project is to determine the optimal long-range wastewater treatment plant, consolidation and trunk sewer pumping scenario. The optimal strategy will support treatment plant environmental compliance while remaining sensitive to the impact to rate payers from recommended improvements. After determining the optimal strategy, the City wishes to develop an improvements implementation plan elaborating logical project limits for procurement, project sequencing, and overall program schedule and budgets for each element. The project plan was developed under three phases as follows: • Phase 1- Develop an optimal wastewater configuration scenario • Phase 2 - Develop an implementation phasing plan • Phase 3 - Develop an implementation programming schedule Our general approach to the wastewater management plan development included: • Confirm what drives capital and operating and maintenance costs - Sustaining capital requirements needs were identified for each of the six (6) existing wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Those factors that will drive future capital expenditure were also identified. Current operating and maintenance (O&M) costs were benchmarked against other comparable facilities and opportunities to optimize existing costs were identified. • Confirm anticipated costs and associated user rates for the status quo alternative - All of the options considered for this study were compared against the alternative of continuation of the existing six -plant system. The project team confirmed the city's current upgrading and expansion plans for the six existing plants. Operational improvements were also identified so that each option considered could be compared against the upgraded, expanded, and optimized six -plant system. • Determine the best recapitalization and consolidation plan that balances cost and technical requirements - An extensive stakeholder engagement plan was conducted to assist in identifying non-financial factors important to the overall plan development. A pre-screening analysis that considered financial, social, environmental and technical factors was used to short-list the best options. • Develop a plan that allows for adjustments to the overall implementation - It is critically important to develop a plan that is flexible enough to account for potential market, regulatory, and technology changes. The pre-screening analysis favored long term servicing options that support flexible implementation. • Develop a CIP and list of contracting packages - Contracting packages that support a cost-effective solution and provide the best value to the City and rate payers were identified. • Identify risk factors associated with implementation - Every project involves some degree of risk. The key project risks, probability of their occurrence, and consequences of a specific risk being realized were identified. A risk management plan was then developed to address identified risks. • Identify the best project delivery approach and plan for each contracting package - The party best able to manage potential project risks was identified in consultation with the City, and the best project delivery approach for each contracting package was determined. • Develop a cash flow plan and schedule - The results of the study were summarized into a cash flow plan and associated schedule. Path C R G kaiak Tisch &use November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 8 Stantec LNV 1.1. Current Wastewater System Configurations and Operations 1.1.1 Existing System Configuration and Operations The City of Corpus Christi presently owns and operates six (6) wastewater treatment facilities. Four of the plants (Allison WWTP, New Broadway WWTP, Oso WRP, and Greenwood WWTP) are located in the main part of the city, one (Laguna Madre WWTP) is located on and services the Flour Bluff area, and one (Whitecap WWTP) is located on Padre Island. The service area for each of the existing six plants is presented here in Figure 1-1. Figure 1-1 Service Area Boundary of Six Existing Wastewater Treatment Plants Allison pro moo, I reenFwU d 1 ISA HOD] City of Corpus Christi I Wastewater Service Areas L� 2 4 8 Miles 12 The plants vary in age from the original construction in the WWTP. • Oso pf9-# MODS 00.4,e. Go,Ouf Cfi,St Day Laguna Madre 3.9 M4DS • 1. The wastewater collection system is extensive and consists 100 miles of force main. Whitecap SR.S M44S 1940s and 1950s to the recently constructed New Broadway of 1,243 miles of sanitary sewer, 100 pumping stations, and Abrief description of each of the six wastewater treatment plants is provide in the text that follows. 9 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 RNIL c kailo'` TlschlerBlse 1.1.1.1 Allison WWTP The Allison WWTP is a 5 million gallon per day (MGD) activated sludge facility that is currently being operated in "contact stabilization" mode. Originally constructed in 1966 as a 2 MGD facility, the Allison WWTP was expanded in 1984 to its current capacity and modified to allow for wastewater treatment to be accomplished in either the "contact stabilization" or "complete mix" mode. An annotated aerial photograph of the existing Allison WWTP is shown in Figure 1-2. Figure 1-2 Aerial Photo of Existing Allison WWTP The liquid treatment unit processes of the Allison WWTP include screening, grit removal, complete mix activated sludge process, secondary clarification, filtration, disinfection, sludge stabilization and sludge dewatering. Raw wastewater enters the plant through a gravity collection system and the force main from the Sharpsburg Lift Station and is then pumped by the Plant Lift Station to the new Mechanical Bar Screen Facility where debris is screened from the flow. The wastewater continues by gravity to the adjacent Grit Removal Unit where grit is separated from the flow before it is split between the East and West Aeration Basins. The activated sludge treatment process consists of nine aeration basins. The aeration basins are separated into the east and west plants. The east plant is from the original 1966 construction and consists of six aeration basins and the west plant was constructed in 1984 and consists of three aeration basins. There are four centrifugal blowers located in the Blower Building that are used to supply air to the east and west aeration basins, east aeration airlift, west aeration airlift, pre - thickener airlift pumps, and aerobic digesters 1 thru 4. Mixed liquor from the Aeration Basins flow to the two Final Clarifiers where solids are allowed to settle out and the clear water (effluent) flows over the weirs to the Automatic Backwash Filter. Return Activated Sludge (RAS) pumps recirculate the solids to the head of the Aeration Basins to Path C R G kalokTisch &use LNV ® Stantec mix with the incoming raw wastewater. The Automatic Backwash Filters provide additional solids removal from the effluent before it is dosed with liquid Sodium Hypochlorite for disinfection in the Chlorine Contact Chamber. At the end of this chamber the effluent is dosed with Sodium Bisulfite to remove the chlorine in the water. Solids are removed from the system, concentrated in the thickeners and stabilized in the Aerobic Digesters prior to dewatering on the two belt presses in the Sludge Dewatering Building. The existing Sludge Drying Beds provide a location for dewatering other material collected at the plant. Dried solids are transported to the City's landfill for disposal. Treated effluent from the Allison WWTP is permitted by the TCEQ to be discharged from two separate outfalls. Outfall 001 is the original discharge method through two parallel 24 -inch diameter pipes leading from the plant site, north to the Nueces River. Treated effluent can also be pumped to Outfall 002, known as the Effluent Diversion Demonstration Project, located across the Nueces River from the plant. Discharge from Outfall 002 is into South Lake in the west end of Nueces Bay. The existing effluent discharge permit for the Allison WWTP was issued January 12, 2015 and expires on May 1, 2018. The current permit limits are summarized here in Table 1-1. Table 1-1 Permit Limits for Existing Allison WWTP Effluent Characteristic Daily Average Outfall No. 001- Nueces River Tidal Flow 5 MGD (peak 2 -hour flow = 15 MGD) BOD5 20 mg/L (weekly - 30 mg/L, max - 45 mg/L) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 20 mg/L (weekly - 30 mg/L, max. - 45 mg/L) Ammonia - Nitrogen 12 mg/L (weekly -18 mg/L, max. - 24 mg/L) Enterococci 35 MPN/100 mL (max. - 104 MPN/100 mL) Outfall No. 002 - Nueces to South Lake Flow 2 MGD (peak 2 -hour flow = 4 MGD) BOD5 20 mg/L (weekly - 30 mg/L, max - 45 mg/L) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 20 mg/L (weekly - 30 mg/L, max. - 45 mg/L) Ammonia - Nitrogen 4 mg/L (weekly- 6 mg/L, max. -10 mg/L) Enterococci 35 MPN/100 mL (max. - 104 MPN/100 mL) November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 10 5 Stantec LNV 1.1.1.2 Broadway WWTP The Broadway WWTP is an 8 MGD activated sludge facility that was constructed between 2010 and 2013 to replace the original Broadway WWTP constructed in 1938 and subsequently upgraded in 1940, 1950, 1954, and 1980. An aerial photo of the existing Broadway WWTP is shown in Figure 1-3.. Figure 1-3 Aerial Photo of Existing Broadway WWTP 1.1.1.3 Greenwood WWTP The Greenwood WWTP is an 8 MGD activated sludge facility that currently operates in the "complete mix" mode. Constructed in 1957, the Greenwood WWTP, was originally known as the Westside WWTP and operated as a trickling filter plant with anaerobic digestion. Since then the Greenwood WWTP underwent two major expansions. The first in 1990 increased the plant's capacity to 6 MGD and converted the contact stabilization. The second expansion occurred in 1998, which further increased the plant's capacity to 8 MGD and converted the wastewater treatment process from the "contact stabilization" mode to the "complete mix" mode. An annotated aerial photo of the existing Greenwood WWTP is shown in Figure 1-4. Figure 1-4 Aerial Photo of Existing Greenwood WWTP The new Broadway WWTP consists of influent pumping, screening, grit removal, three aeration basins, two secondary clarifiers, and UV disinfection. The new Broadway WWTP is the only existing facility that accepts hauled waste. The plant discharges treated effluent to the Corpus Christi inner harbor. The existing effluent discharge permit for the new BroadwayWWTPwas issued December 10, 2013 and expired on June 1, 2016. The City is currently negotiating a permit renewal with TCEQ. The current permit limits are summarized here in Table 1-2. Note that the peak 2 -hour capacity has been planned and permitted for 40 MGD but to date has only been built at 20 MGD. Table 1-2 Permit Limits for New Broadway WWTP Effluent Characteristic Daily Average Discharge - Corpus Christi Inner Harbor Flow BODS Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Total Copper Enterococci 8 MGD (peak 2 -hour flow = 40 MGD) 20 mg/L (weekly- 30 mg/L, max - 45 mg/L) 20 mg/L (weekly- 30 mg/L, max. - 45 mg/L) 0.0241 mg/L (max. - 0.051 mg/L) 35 MPN/100 mL (max. - 104 MPN/100 mL) The liquid treatment unit processes of the Greenwood WWTP include screening, grit removal, complete mix activated sludge process, secondary clarification, disinfection, sludge stabilization and sludge dewatering. All raw wastewater flow enters the plant through the gravity collection system and is then pumped by the Plant Lift Station to the Influent Structure where debris is removed by the mechanical bar screens and grit is separated in the grit chambers. A Parshall flume and flow meter measure and record the influent flow stream. Splitter Box No.1 on the end of this structure divides the flow to the four Primary Clarifiers. A portion of the solids settle out in the primary clarifiers and they are pumped to the thickener. The remaining raw wastewater overflows the clarifier weirs and continues on to Splitter Box No. 2. Splitter Box No. 2 is used to mix the raw wastewater from the Primary Clarifiers with the Return Activated Sludge (RAS) from the Final Clarifiers and then divides it to each end of the Aeration Basins. The activated sludge treatment process consists of five aeration basins. There are four centrifugal blowers located in the Blower Building that are 11 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 nein C R G kapok Tsscs h lase used to supply air to the Aeration Basins and various airlift pumps and aerated structures. Mixed liquor from the Aeration Basins flow to the two Final Clarifiers where solids are allowed to settle out and the clear water (effluent) flows over the weirs to the Effluent Screening Facility. RAS pumps recirculate the solids to Splitter Box No. 2 to mix with the raw wastewater. A portion of the settled solids is removed as Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) and is pumped to the thickener. The Effluent Screening Facility removes any remaining larger solids from the effluent before it travels through the Ultraviolet (UV) Disinfection Unit. The effluent is dosed with ultraviolet light in the UV Disinfection Unit to kill pathogens and provide disinfection of the effluent prior to discharge. A Parshall flume and flow meter measure and record the effluent prior to discharge at the Effluent Structure. This structure also contains the non -potable water pumps that pump the treated effluent into the plant non -potable water distribution system for use around the plant site. An Effluent Pump Station is located adjacent to the Effluent Structure and pumps water for off-site effluent reuse. Primary solids from the four primary clarifiers, as well as Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) from the secondary clarifiers are pumped to the Dissolved Air Floatation (DAF) Thickener for additional thickening. The supernatant from the DAF is either transported back to the lift station at the headworks of the plant or is re -circulated through the DAF following air -injection. From the DAF, the sludge goes through the Digester Pump Building and is pumped into one of two primary anaerobic digesters: Primary Digester No. 2 and Primary Digester No. 3, which are filled alternately. The sludge in the primary digesters is recirculated through the sludge heaters in the Digester Pump Building. These heaters are operated as necessary (mostly in the winter months when the ambient temperatures are low) to maintain optimal temperatures for anaerobic digestion. The sludge is then pumped through the Digester No. 1 Pump House into Primary Digester No. 1 where further anaerobic digestion occurs. Under designed operating conditions Primary Digester No. 1 is filled from the bottom and the sludge is mixed periodically through recirculation. The sludge then gravity feeds into the Secondary Digester for final digestion. In the Secondary Digester the sludge is also periodically recirculated while decanting supernatant from the sludge. This supernatant is transported back to the Influent Lift Station through a 10 -inch drain line. From the Secondary Digester, the sludge is pumped into the Sludge Dewatering Building and fed into one of the two belt filter presses. The filtrate from the belt filter presses is transported back to the Influent Lift Station through the same 10 -inch drain line conveying the supernatant from the secondary digester. Even though the plant has the Path C R G kaiakTisch &use LNV ® Stantec ability to utilize two belt filter presses, only one is used at a time because the 10 -inch drain line tends to overflow. The dewatered solids from the belt filter presses are transferred to containers and transported off-site for disposal. The plant has sludge drying beds, but these are not routinely in use for dewatering sludge. The beds are occasionally used if the belt filter presses are down or if a greater volume of solids needs to be wasted from the plant. Biogas is collected from all four digesters. The biogas from Primary Digester No. 2 and No. 3 is collected and is either re -injected into the respective digesters, transported to the Digester Pump Building to be combusted in the heaters, or is sent to the facility Waste Gas Burner (Flare). The heaters utilize the biogas and supplemental natural gas to heat the undigested sludge to improve the efficiency of the anaerobic digestion process. The biogas produced from Primary Digester No. 1 and the Secondary Digester is collected and flows to the Digester Pump Building to also be used by the sludge heaters. Excess biogas not utilized by the sludge heaters is combusted through the Waste Gas Burner (Flare). The existing effluent discharge permit for the Greenwood WWTP was issued March 24, 2014 and expires on June 1, 2017. The current permit limits are summarized here in Table 1-3. Table 1-3 Permit Limits for Greenwood WWTP Effluent Characteristic Daily Average Discharge - La Volla Creek (thence to Oso Creek and iimmismanimmegramisimilirmesi Flow 8 MGD (peak 2 -hour flow = 24 MGD) BODS 10 mg/L (weekly -15 mg/L, max - 25 mg/L) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 15 mg/L (weekly - 25 mg/L, max. - 45 mg/L) Total Copper 0.013 mg/L (max. - 0.027 mg/L) Ammonia -Nitrogen 3 mg/L (weekly- 6 mg/L, max. -10 mg/L) Enterococci 35 MPN/100 mL (max. - 104 MPN/100 mL) Dissolved Oxygen 4 mg/L minimum 1.1.1.4 Laguna Madre WWTP The Laguna Madre Wastewater Treatment Plant is a 3.0 MGD activated sludge facility that is currently operated in the extended aeration mode. The plant was originally constructed in 1971 to serve the Flour Bluff area of Corpus Christi, and was expanded in 1986 to meet projected population demand. The Laguna Madre Plant has the ability to be operated in either extended aeration or contact stabilization mode. An annotated aerial photo of the existing Laguna Madre WWTP is presented here as Figure 1-5. November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 12 Stantec LNV Figure 1-5 Aerial Photo of Existing Laguna Madre WWTP The existing plant process consists of an influent lift station, headworks (including manual bar screen and grit removal facility), aeration basins, secondary clarifiers, return activated sludge (RAS) pumps, chlorine contact chamber, chlorination and dechlorination equipment, effluent pump station, sludge pre -thickener, aerobic sludge digestion, sludge holding tank, and belt filter press. The plant has sludge drying beds which are not used at the present time, but are used when the belt press is taken offline for maintenance. Raw sewage flows into the influent lift station where the sewage is pumped to the headworks. Flow from the influent lift station is combined with raw sewage flows from the Jester Street lift station and the Laguna Shores lift station which enter the plant directly at the headworks. The combined flows pass through a manual bar screen into a grit chamber where grit and debris settle and are removed by air lift pump and grit screw conveyor. The wastewater then flows into the aeration basin where it is mixed with the RAS from both clarifiers. The mixed liquor then flows through a series of three aeration basins, where air is added to the mixed liquor using fine bubble diffusers. The aerated mixed liquor then flows over a straight weir, into a splitter box that splits the flow between the two clarifiers via two sluice gates. In the clarifiers, the mixed liquor is stilled to allow solids to settle. Solids are collected in the center cone and flows by gravity to the RAS station, where it is either sent back to the aeration chambers as RAS or it is wasted as sludge. The clarified effluent is collected through a system of overflow weirs and then flows, by gravity, to the chemical injection boxes where it is disinfected with a solution of sodium hypochlorite (hypochlorite). The effluent then flows by gravity into the chlorine contact chamber over an aeration weir and then through a v -notch weir where the chlorinated effluent is dechlorinated using a solution of sodium bisulfite. The flow rate of the dechlorinated effluent is measured by a Parshall flume. After passing through the Parshall flume, the effluent moves into a diversion box where the effluent can either be discharged by gravity to the primary outfall, (the Laguna Madre) or diverted to the effluent lift station where it is pumped off site for reuse. The plant is set up in such a way that sludge may be wasted from the center aeration basin, the clarifiers, or both. Sludge and scum from the center aeration basin are gravity fed to the pre -thickener and then pumped into the aerobic digesters where air is added to the sludge using coarse bubble diffusers and then flows to the concentrator (sludge thickener). The RAS pumps transfer the sludge from the clarifiers to either the aeration basin (as return) or digesters (as waste). The wasted sludge from the concentrator is pumped to a small sludge holding tank, and then pumped to a larger sludge holding tank and finally dewatered using a belt filter press. While the plant has drying beds, they are currently not being used. If the sludge drying beds are needed the sludge would be pumped from the small sludge holding tank to the drying beds. If the plant is operated in contact stabilization mode, wastewater from the headworks would be directed into the last aeration chamber and the return sludge from the clarifiers would be directed to the first aeration chamber. The return sludge would be aerated and stabilized before combining with the untreated wastewater in the last chamber. Once the mixed liquor passes over the straight weir into the splitter box, flow moves through the plant as described above. Compressed air is supplied to the processes through a series of five (5) blowers. The three (3) newer blowers provide air to the grit chamber, the sludge holding tank near the belt filter press, and the aeration basin. The two (2) older blowers provide air to the sludge digesters. The hypochlorite and the bisulfite are stored in above- ground tanks inside of a containment area. The plant is designed to use chemical feed pumps paced off the effluent flow meter to inject these solutions into the process. The existing effluent discharge permit for the Laguna Madre WWTP was issued August 6, 2015 and expires on April 1, 2020. The current permit limits are summarized here in Table 1-4. 13 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 C c kailo" TischlerBise Table 1-4 Permit Limits for Laguna Madre WWTP Effluent Characteristic Daily Average Discharge - Laguna Madre Flow BODS Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Enterococci 3 MGD (peak 2 -hour flow = 9 MGD) 20 mg/L (weekly- 30 mg/L, max - 45 mg/L) 20 mg/L (weekly- 30 mg/L, max. - 45 mg/L) 35 MPN/100 mL (max. - 104 MPN/100 mL) 1.1.1.5 Oso WRP The Oso Water Reclamation Plant (WRP) has a capacity of 16.2 MGD making it the largest of the six wastewater treatment plants in the City of Corpus Christi. The plant serves approximately 50% of the City's population located on the City's south side . The original Oso WRP was constructed in 1941 and has undergone several expansion projects with the most recent upgrade taking place in 1982. The existing treatment plant is operated as a conventional activated sludge facility with aerobic digestion and without primary clarification. An annotated aerial photo of the existing Oso WRP is presented here as Figure 1-6. Figure 1-6 Aerial Photo of Existing Oso WRP The Oso WRP is configured as two parallel trains; each rated at 8.1 MGD average daily flow. Although the original contact stabilization configuration was recently modified and improved with the addition ofbreakpoint chlorination and step feed pumps, the process was not originally intended, nor is it operationally efficient at removing ammonia. Influent is delivered to the Oso WRP by two in -plant lift stations and a remote lift station (Williams Lift Station), all of which discharge at the plant's headworks facility. The existing headworks includes two coarse bar screens (1 -inch spacing), and an aerated grit tank which has been out of service for many years. The screenings drop to a conveyor where they discharge into a screenings box for disposal. Path C R G kaiokTisch &use LNV ® Stantec Screened influent is introduced into the aeration basins (contact basins) where it is "contacted" with a high concentration of activated sludge. The microorganisms rapidly absorb BOD, as they have been without an external carbon source while passing through the re -aeration basins (stabilization basins). Flow from the aeration basins is directed to the rectangular secondary clarifiers, where activated sludge settles, separating it from the effluent. Activated sludge is then returned to the re -aeration basins, and the effluent proceeds to the chlorine contact basins for disinfection. The effluent from the two trains is fed to a common junction box where it is then dechlorinated and proceeds to the permitted outfall in Oso Bay. Return activated sludge (RAS) is delivered to the re- aeration basins where oxygen from additional aeration promotes metabolism of absorbed BOD. Waste activated sludge (WAS) is pumped to the end of the first pass of the re -aeration basins and is delivered to the aerobic digesters (four in series). Digested sludge is piped from Digester 1 to the recently constructed belt press building. The sludge is mixed with polymer, pressed in one of four filter presses, and then stored in a container until it is trucked to landfill for disposal. The existing effluent discharge permit for the Oso WRP was issued April 29, 2011 and expired on June 1, 2014. The City submitted a permit renewal and amendment application to TCEQ, on December 3, 2013. The permit application has been declared administratively complete and is currently under review. The current and proposed permit limits are summarized here in Table 1-5. Table 1-5 Permit Limits for Oso WRP Effluent Characteristic Daily Average Discharge - Oso Bay Flow 16.2 MGD (peak 2 -hour flow = 98 MGD) CBOD5 20 mg/L (weekly - 30 mg/L, max - 45 mg/L) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 20 mg/L (weekly - 30 mg/L, max. - 45 mg/L) Ammonia -Nitrogen 4 mg/L (weekly- 6 mg/L, max. -10 mg/L) Chlorine Residual 0.1 mg/L (maximum) Minimum Dissolved Oxygen 5 mg/L Enterococci 35 MPN/100 mL (max. - 89 MPN/100 mL) November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 14 Stantec LNV 1.1.1.6 Whitecap WWTP The Whitecap WWTP is a 2.5 MGD activated sludge treatment plant that was constructed in 1974 and serves the Padre Island portion of the City of Corpus Christi. An annotated aerial photo of the existing Whitecap WWTP is presented here as Figure 1-7. Figure 1-7 Aerial Photo of Existing Whitecap WWTP Raw influent enters the plant at the Bar Screen Building/ Headworks. This structure houses one climber screen with approximately 3/4 -inch bar spacing. Large solids are removed by the screen and carried to a small roll -off container by a belt conveyor. The screened wastewater flows to the Influent Lift Station which is configured as a wet-pit/dry-pit pump station. Screened influent is pumped to the Aeration Basin Distribution Structure equipped with gates and weirs to control flows to the Aeration Basins. The mixed liquor, a combination of raw sewage and RAS, is then split between two Aeration Basins with fine -bubble, membrane diffusers. After aeration, the Secondary Distribution Structure directs flow to one or both Secondary Clarifiers. Clear water from Clarifiers 1 and 2 flows over v -notch weirs and is disinfected in the Ultraviolet (UV) Disinfection Basin. Treated effluent is discharged into a saltwater channel connecting Corpus Christi Bay and Baffin Bay on the west side of Padre Island. The non -potable and reuse water systems draw treated effluent from a box just upstream of the Parshall Flume. Solids from the Clarifiers are removed by the RAS/WAS pumps in the RAS/WAS Pump Station. Return Activated Sludge (RAS) is directed to the Aeration Basin Distribution Structure and the Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) is pumped to the Aerobic Digesters. After digestion, solids are pumped into an effluent chamber and piped to the Solids Handling Building. WAS is pumped to the belt filter press, mixed with polymer, and pressed to a cake. The cake is disposed of by truck and landfilled. The plant also has the ability to utilize sludge drying beds for solids handling, as a contingency. The existing effluent discharge permit for the Whitecap WWTP expires on July 1, 2017. The current permit limits are summarized here in Table 1-6. Table 1-6 Permit Limits for Whitecap WWTP Effluent Characteristic Daily Average Discharge - Laguna Madre in Segment No. 2491 of the Flow Bays & Estuaries 2.5 MGD (peak 2 -hour flow = 7.5 MGD) BODS 20 mg/L (weekly - 30 mg/L, max - 45 mg/L) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 20 mg/L (weekly - 30 mg/L, max. - 45 mg/L) Minimum Dissolved Oxygen 4 mg/L Enterococci 35 MPN/100 mL (max. - 104 MPN/100 mL) 1.1.2 Physical Condition Survey of Existing Plants and Major Pumping Stations x.1.2.1 Physical Condition Survey Overview The consulting team conducted a physical condition survey of the City's six wastewater treatment facilities and two large wastewater lift stations. The primary objective of the assessment was to confirm the physical condition of the primary assets and estimate the required sustaining capital requirements for each facility. The Team had access to previous Assessment Reports, compiled by others, and the City of Corpus Christi Wastewater Capital Improvement Plan for 2015 to 2017. The Wastewater Department Business Plan and individual WWTP operating budgets, NPDES permits and Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR) for 2014 and 2015 were also reviewed. In addition, the Team leveraged its knowledge of the facilities, local conditions and relationships with equipment suppliers to evaluate and price the suggested improvements. As part of the assessment, an Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) was developed for each process area in each facility based on the Teams assessment on when those systems would need to be upgraded over the next 15 -years. These costs were derived from previous reports and the Teams understanding of the local market. Where it was determined that improvements were planned by the City, but not yet under construction, the costs were included in the OPC. Where a construction contract had been issued by the City, the costs for the upgrades were not included in the physical condition survey cost summary. The Williams and Woolridge Lift Stations were also inspected as part of this effort. Both lift stations were constructed in 1981. The Woolridge Lift Station recently added a stand-alone wet weather bypass pump to alleviate wet weather backups into neighboring homes. The 15 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 nein G C R halo Tisch rise LNV ® Stantec Williams Lift Station has not had any major improvements since being constructed. A review of the monthly National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) for the years 2014 and 2015 indicated that the facilities have an excellent compliance record. The percent of compliance was calculated using the number of permitted parameters and the frequency of the required testing. Where continuous monitoring is required, it was not used in the calculation, but any exceedances were used. Table 1-7 outlines the facilities compliance record. Table 1-7 Monthly DMRs for 2014 and 2015 Facility Compliance Record 2014 Compliance Record 2015 Percent Compliance 99.56% Excursions 9 Parameter(s) Ammonia Percent Compliance 99.90% Excursions 2 Parameter(s) Ammonia, Enterococcus Allison WWTP Greenwood WWTP 99.84% 3 Enterococcus 99.64% 7 Enterococcus, Copper Laguna Madre WWTP 100% 0 100.00% 0 New Broadway WWTP 99.83% 4 Enterococcus 99.87% 3 Enterococcus, Max Flow Oso WRP 99.96% 1 Enterococcus 100.00% 0 Whitecap WWTP 99.88% 1 Enterococcus 99.76% 2 Enterococcus It is a credit to the operating staff at each facility that they have been able to keep the facilities running and in compliance with its NPDES permit over 99% of the time. 1.1.2.2 Assessment Approach The assessment was conducted using a multidisciplinary approach including process, process mechanical, structural, electrical, instrumentation and controls and HVAC mechanical perspectives. The following WWTP areas were included as part of the assessment and were tailored to meet the processes at each facility. Area 01: Site Development/ SCADA Area 02: Influent Pump Station/ Control Building Area 03: Grit Removal Area 04: Primary Treatment Area 05: Secondary Treatment Area 06: Effluent Filtration Area 07: Disinfection Area 08: Outfall Area 09: Thickening Area 10: Aerobic Digestion Area 11: Anaerobic Digestion Area 12: Biogas System Area 13: Flood Management The goal of the condition assessment was to identify specific processes and equipment needed to maintain the facility to meet the current NPDES permit requirements and reduce operating costs over the next 15 -years. In preparation for the assessment, Stantec prepared a standardized Facility Assessment Form (FAF) for each facility and process area. Each FAF includes a general cover sheet, condition ratings and description, and individual discipline specific sections that detail the observations of the assessment Team for each process area. Condition ratings and subsequent descriptions are included in Table 1-8. Path C R G kaiokTisch &use November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 16 C Stantec LNV Table 1-8 Physical Condition Ratings and Descriptions Condition Grade Description Very Good Sound, modern structure or equipment, operable and well-maintained Good As "Very Good", but showing some minor signs of deterioration. Routine refurbishment and maintenance required. Fair Functionally sound, but appearance significantly affected by deterioration. Structure is marginal in its capacity to prevent leakage. Mechanical and electrical plant and components function adequately but with some reduced efficiency and minor problems. Poor Deterioration has significant effect on performance of asset due to leakage or other structural problems. Mechanical and electrical components function but require significant maintenance to remain operational. Very Poor Serious structural problems having detrimental effect on performance of the asset. Will require major overhaul/ replacement of the asset in the short term. All facilities were inspected between January 20, 2016 and January 27, 2016. The purpose of this effort was to evaluate the facility, estimate the costs to upgrade the facility and to allocate those costs based on five year increments beginning in the current year and ending at year fifteen. The following is a summary of the findings. Additional studies that are recommended are also included. All WWTPs, except New Broadway, Whitecap and Laguna Madre, currently use coarse bubble diffusers in the aeration system. Due to the inherent lower energy efficiency of this technology and the increased operating costs, this technology is proposed to be replaced at each facility. A summary of the assessment results for each facility is presented in the text that follows. Detailed inspection information maybe found in the detailed physical condition survey report provided as a stand-alone document. 1.1.2.3 Allison WWTP The facility was rated as "Poor" overall. The impact of age, the wastewater and local environment, combined with the lack of capital improvements, has taken its toll on the facility. The most recent capital improvements corrected major deficiencies in the headworks, but did not make modifications to other portions of the process. The facility continues to be operated using outdated technology which hinders management's ability to implement efficiencies and cost savings in the operations. 1.1.2.4 Greenwood WWTP The facility is rated as "Poor". The impact of age, the wastewater and local environment, combined with the lack of capital improvements, has taken its toll on the facility. The facility continues to be operated using outdated technology which hinders management's ability to bring out efficiencies and cost savings in the operations. The NPDES permit requires the initiation of an "engineering and financial plan" when the plant flows reach 75% of the design capacity. The 2015 flows indicate that this milestone has been achieved. An evaluation of the current UV disinfection system is proposed. The facility is subject to flooding. A study is proposed to review and suggest the implementation of a strategy to protect the facility from flooding. 1.1.2.5 Laguna Madre WWTP The facility is rated as "Fair". This rating is primarily due to the on-going construction which will add state-of-the- art improvements to the headworks. The impact of age, the wastewater and the local environment, combined with the lack of capital improvements, has taken its toll on the remainder of the facility. The current on-going capital improvements will correct several deficiencies, but will not correct them all. The facility continues to be operated using outdated technology which hinders management's ability to implement efficiencies and cost savings in the operations. 1.1.2.6 New Broadway WWTF The facility should be rated as "Very Good" when complete. The facility was put into limited service in 2014. The effluent filter was given a "Poor" rating. It is still operational, but in need of replacement or removal from service. There was one "Very Poor" rating given. A concrete construction joint in the aeration basins was actively leaking. There were also several poor ratings given for concrete expansion joint issues in the aeration basin area. An evaluation of disinfection alternatives, including UV, Chlorine, and filtration is recommended. The UV system is currently being operated at full capacity, although the facility flows are 58% of design flow. 17 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse 1.1.2.7 Oso WRP The facility is rated as "Poor". The impact of age, the wastewater and local environment, combined with the lack of capital improvements, has taken its toll on the facility. When a change in the NPDES permit required ammonia removal, temporary pumps were set up and a process modification from contact stabilization to conventional activated sludge was initiated. Along with breakpoint chlorination, the facility was in compliance with its NPDES permit 100% of the time. These interim pumping arrangements were still in operation during the inspection. The facility continues to be operated using outdated technology which hinders management's ability to implement efficiencies and cost savings in the operations. An evaluation of breakpoint chlorination and ammonia removal and the impacts for bacteria limits is proposed. 1.1.2.8 Whitecap WWTP The facility is rated as "Poor". The impact of age, the wastewater and local environment, combined with the lack of capital improvements, has taken its toll on the facility. There are several capital improvements proposed by others. These projects are focused and will correct several deficiencies, but will not correct them all. The facility continues to be operated using outdated technology which hinders management's ability to bring about efficiencies and cost savings in the operations. 1.1.2.9 Williams Liff Station The facility is rated as "Fair". The impact of age, the wastewater and local environment, combined with the lack of capital improvements, has had an impact on the facility. LNV ® Stantec 1.1.2.10 Woolridge Liff Station The facility is rated as "Fair". The impact of age, the wastewater and local environment, combined with the lack of capital improvements, has had an impact on the facility. 1.1.2.11 Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) As part of the assessment, an Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) was developed for required upgrades at each facility and each process area within the facility. The OPC is based on the Teams assessment on when those systems would need to be upgraded over the next 15 -years. These costs were derived from previous reports and the Teams understanding of the local market. Where it was determined that improvements were planned, but not yet under construction, the costs were included in the OPC. Where a construction contract had been issued by the City, the costs for the upgrades were not included in the summary. Where further evaluations were required to better define a solution, an evaluation phase was added followed by an estimated cost. These evaluations are defined by year and are discussed in each facility cost breakdown by year in the Physical Condition Report. Costs for all intervals are based on 2016 dollar terms and are not inflated. Costs for Engineering Services were assumed to be 15%, City Administrative Services 10%, and a Contingency was applied at 30%. The estimated costs for required upgrades, by facility, are summarized here as Table 1-9. Table 1-9 Summary of Required Upgrade Costs by Facility Facility/Years 0-5 Years 6-10 Years 11-15 Years 16-20 Years Total Allison WWTP $13,207,000 $3,506,000 $2,467,000 $937,000 $20,117,000 Greenwood WWTP $14,398,000 $31,011,000 $5,174,000 $10,395,000 $60,978,000 LagunaMadreWWTP $6,581,000 $408,000 $428,000 $1,306,000 $8,723,000 New Broadway WWTP $20,624,000 $3,319,000 $173,000 $702,000 $24,818,000 OsoWRP $53,918,000 $3,431,000 $6,395,000 $17,679,000 $81,423,000 Whitecap WWTP $18,730,000 $213,000 $1,837,000 $2,154,000 $22,934,000 Williams LS $452,000 $1,250,000 $56,000 $1,758,000 Woolridge LS $444,000 $1,250,000 $56,000 $1,750,000 Incremental Costs $128,354,000 $41,888,000 $18,974,000 $33,285,000 $222,501,000 vi G C R kailo "` TischlerSise November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 18 Stantec LNV Detailed tables which outline the capital costs for the recommendations can be found in each of the facility sections of the physical condition report. 1.1.3 Existing Operations Assessment 1.1.3.1 Operations Assessment Overview The consulting team performed a review of the current operation and maintenance (O&M) practices at the City's six wastewater treatment plants. This assessment did not include the City's lift stations or collection system. The collection system is being assessed by the City under a long term program as discussed in Section 1.1.4. The primary objectives of the operations assessment included reviewing the existing operating and maintenance (O&M) budgets and practices at each of the six plants, benchmarking O&M costs against other similar sized operations in the country, and identifying potential O&M cost savings through operations improvement. In addition, the consulting team conducted a staffing level benchmarking effort at each plant. 1.1.3.2 O&M Cost Drivers The major costs in providing wastewater treatment services can be broken down into 3 major measurable categories. These categories are: Personnel costs, Power costs, and Chemical costs. These benchmarks were selected because they are typically the largest budget line items and there is sufficient benchmarking data to compare the City's cost to others. Personnel costs are typically the largest budgeted costs. These costs are driven by Federal, State, and local requirements. Local requirements include City Policy and Department practice. Examples of "Local Requirements" would include such things as the number of holidays per year, the accrual and taking of vacation and sick leave, general training requirements, and employee benefit packages. Examples of "Departmental Practice" would include, plant process staffing and employee callout for overtime. The operations assessment focused on "Departmental Practice". Power costs are driven by any number of physical restraints. Facility condition and equipment, controls and operating practices were the focus of the operations assessment. Chemical costs are driven by process requirements and controls available to maximize their effectiveness. Current equipment and operating practices were reviewed. In addition, the age of the equipment and the level of automation needed to control the equipment have a significant impact on the ability to reduce operating costs. In five of the six facilities, equipment and control upgrades have not kept up with current industry standards. 1.1.3.3 Benchmarking The primary source for benchmarking the City's operation was the National Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA) "Opportunities & Challenges in Clean Water Utility Financing and Management - NACWA Financial Survey, July 2015" (NACWA Study). This report contains information reported from over one hundred utilities across the United States for 2013. Additional data from other sources was also used where additional comparisons provided clarity to the parameters measured and recommendations provided. The comparison data from the City was the 2016 Wastewater Department Amended Budgets and the 2015 actual plant flows. Additionally, power usage for all facilities for the period October, 2014 through September, 2015 was also used. 1.1.3.4 Overall Comparisons Personnel costs are the largest single treatment cost. These currently account for 23.1% ($4.18 M) of the total facility budgets. The NACWA Study compared the number of staff for treatment and biosolids operations per million gallons per day of wastewater treated. The overall staffing benchmarking is summarized here in Table 1-10. Table 1-10 Overall Staffing Benchmarking Data Source Staffing/MG NACWA Study 1.8 City 2.1 (2015 Flow) City City 1.9 (80% Design Flow) 1.45 (Design Flow) This metric is influenced by the flow into the facilities and the level of automation. The NACWA Study does not differentiate based on the percent of design capacity. Typically staffing levels do not increase due to increased flow. Staffing of small facilities is typically higher on an MGD basis than larger facilities. The City compares favorably to the national average in the aggregate. Possible staffing adjustments are discussed in the text below as well as in the detailed assessment report enclosed in Appendix A. Overall, the amount of day to day maintenance should increase. During the walk through, the condition of the systems indicated that the facilities would be served by an increase in the level of maintenance provided. Power Costs are the second highest treatment cost. Power currently accounts for 21.3% ($3.682 M) of the total facilities budgets. 19 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse The NACWA Study compared the electrical costs per million gallons per day of wastewater treated. The benchmarking of power costs against the national averages is presented in Table 1-11. Table 1-11 Overall Power Benchmarking ($/MG Treated) Electrical Cost ($)/MG Data Source Treated NACWA Study $202.74 City $340.00 The City's costs appear to be 40.3% higher than the national average. This is influenced by the unit cost of electricity, the condition and number of facilities, types of aeration and pumping employed and the amount of automation at each facility. An additional metric is the energy usage per million gallons per day treated (kWh/MGD). This metric provides a more realistic comparison since the unit cost of electricity is not considered. The energy usage per million gallons treated is presented here in Table 1-12. Table 1-12 Overall Power Benchmarking (kWh/MG) Data Source Electrical Energy Usage (kWh/MG Treated) NACWA Study 1,677 Wisconsin Best Practice (1 - 5 MGD) 1,650 Wisconsin Best practice (> 5 MGD) 1,760 City (1 - 5 MGD) (Allison, Laguna Madre, New Broadway, Whitecap) 3,160 City (> 5 MGD) (Greenwood, Oso) 3,234 City (Total) 3,227 These metrics indicate that the City's current average electrical usage is approximately 192% of benchmarked data. There are numerous metrics available that compare power consumption, both overall and by process. The data varies based on the extent to which energy saving process changes have been implemented. The typical energy usage by process or activity is summarized here as Table 1-13. Table 1-13 Typical Process Energy Usage in a Wastewater Treatment Facility Typical Energy Usage Process (% of Total) Aeration 53%to 67% Pumping 14% to 21% Lighting 3% to 8% Other Loads 11elt' C R G 4%to 30% kaiak Tiscff lee ise LNV ® Stantec Aeration is the major source of power usage in the wastewater treatment plant. The efficiency of oxygen transfer to water, as well as the efficiency of pumping and controlling the air flow has significant energy impacts. The New Broadway WWTP is equipped with fine bubble diffusion, variable speed blowers, and DO monitoring and control. The Laguna Madre and Whtiecap WWTPs use fine bubble diffusers but no blower modulation or DO control. The remaining facilities have coarse bubble diffusion, no blower modulation and no DO monitoring or control. Similarly, process pumping is the second major source for power usage. The New Broadway WWTP was installed with variable speed drives on most pumping applications. All other facilities have limited variable speed applications. Variable speed drives allow for the pumping of process flows to meet the demand of the treatment system. It has been reported that a 20% reduction in speed would reduce power input by 50%. This savings would be realized where speed variation over a day would be significant enough to require avariable speed pumping application. Motor replacement costs should be reviewed in the context of life cycle costs. Energy efficient motors, although having a higher first cost, have a lower life cycle cost when considering 96% of the life cycle cost are power costs. Power costs for solids processing and disinfection are reported in the literature as 20% and 1%, respectively. The results of the operations assessment suggest the City has the potential to reduce power costs by approximately $1.7 M annually. In addition, many electric utilities provide grants to assist wastewater utilities in the study and implementation of energy reduction efforts. These grants further reduce the implementation costs. An energy survey and power usage study should be conducted to better understand where these savings can be achieved and the cost of capital improvements necessary to obtain these savings. Chemical Costs are the third highest treatment cost. These currently account for 12.9% ($2.342 M) of the total facility budgets. The NACWA Study compared the Chemical costs per million gallons per day of wastewater treated. The overall chemical cost per million gallons treated is presented here in Table 1-14. Table 1-14 Overall Chemical Cost Benchmark ($/ MG Treated) Chemical Cost ($)/MG Data Source Treated NACWA Study $99.14 City $216.00 Chemical costs are 218% higher than the national average. November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 20 Stantec LNV The City uses chemicals in the treatment process for two primary purposes, disinfection to meet the enterococcus permit limit and for sludge conditioning as part of the belt filter press and centrifuge process. There are various processes employed to meet the permitted bacteria limits. UV disinfection is employed at the Whitecap WWTP. Disinfection via chlorination/ dechlorination is employed at Allison WWTP, Oso WRP and Laguna Madre WWTP, and a combination of UV and chlorination/ dechlorination is employed at Greenwood WWTP and New Broadway WWTP. Generally, where chlorination/ dechlorination is used control systems should be inspected, repaired or replaced so that optimization efforts can be implemented to reduce chemical usage and associated costs. An evaluation has been proposed to review the disinfection, and filtration issues at each facility. 1.1.3.5 Summary of Benchmarking Results by Facility A summary of the benchmarking results by treatment facility is presented here as Table 1-15. The detailed assessments of each facility are presented in the assessment report enclosed in Appendix A. Table 1-15 Summary of Benchmarking Results by Facility Category NACWA Benchmark City Comparison Notes Allison WWTP Staffing • 1.8/MG • 2.9/MG • 1.6/MG (design flow) • Condition of facility and lack of automation controls precludes staff reductions. • Once facility brought up to standard there are opportunities to reallocate staff (potential to go to 5 -day work week and reduce staff by 2 FTEs). Power • $202.74/MG treated • 1,677 kW hr/ MG treated • $430/MG treated • 2,201 kW-hr/MG treated • With upgrade of plant systems potential savings is $107,000/year. Chemical • $99.14/MGD • $254/MGD • Chemical costs approximately 218% higher than national average. Greenwood WWTP Staffing • 1.8/MG • 1.6/MG (2015) • 1.2/MG (Design flow) • There are no automated controls and all of the facilities are operated manually • Condition of the facility precludes recommendation for staffing reductions. Power • $202.74/MG treated • 1,677 kW hr/ MG treated • $294/MG treated • 2,823 kW-hr/MG treated • With upgrade of plant systems potential savings is $259,000/year. • Further use of biogas could potentially increase the power savings. Chemical • $99.14/MGD • $87/MGD • Chemical costs are in line with expectations. Laguna Madre WWTP Staffing • 1.8/MG • 4.0/MG (2015) • 2.7/MG (Design flow) • Condition of the facility precludes recommendation for staffing reductions. • Consider going to a 5 -day work week at this facility • SCADA upgrades could allow sharing of staff between Laguna Madre and Whitecap Power • $202.74/MG treated • 1,677 kW hr/ MG treated • $192/MG treated • 2,791 kW-hr/MG treated • With upgrade of plant systems potential savings is $57,000/year. Chemical • $99.14/MGD • $151/MGD 21 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse LNV Stantec Category NACWA Benchmark City Comparison Notes New Broadway WWTP Staffing • 1.8/MG • 2.4/MG (2015) • 1.4/MG (Design flow) • Staffing levels compare favorably with bench mark levels. Power • $202.74/MG treated • 1,677 kW hr/ MG treated • $355/MG treated • 3,224 kW-hr/MG treated • Power consumption 195% of bench mark. • With optimization of plant systems potential savings is $307,000/ year. Chemical • $99.14/MGD • $114/MGD Oso WRP Staffing • 1.8/MG • 1.2/MG (2015) • 1.0/MG (Design flow) • Staffing levels are below the national average • Consider going to an 8 hr/day 7 -day work week. This change could allow the staffto be restructured allocating FTEs toward maintenance activities. Power • $202.74/MG treated • 1,677 kW hr/ MG treated • $356/MG treated • 3,545 kW-hr/MG treated • Power consumption 201% of bench mark. • With optimization of plant systems potential savings is $850,000/ year. Chemical • $99.14/MGD • $333/MGD • Chemical costs are excessive. Alternatives to breakpoint chlorination need to be investigated. Whitecap WWTP Staffing • 1.8/MG • 7.0/MG (2015) • 3.2/MG (Design flow) • Staffing levels are above the national average • With a modern SCADA system it maybe possible to reduce staffing by 2 FTEs. Power • $202.74/MG treated • 1,677 kW hr/ MG treated • $391/MG treated • 4,423 kW-hr/MG treated • Power consumption 268% of bench mark. • With optimization of plant systems potential savings is $61,000/ year. Chemical • $99.14/MGD • $12/MGD • Chemical feed rates are below the national average. The primary conclusions that can be drawn for each of the individual facilities can be summarized as follows: Allison WWTP • 8 operating staff (operates 7 days per week 8 hours per day - maximum staffing on any given day is 5). • Belt press operation is 5 days per week • Operational control of the existing secondary treatment process is limited. • A review of the current solids retention time (SRT) control practices is recommended. • The existing sodium hypochlorite system requires replacement or additional maintenance. • Equipment issues with the thickeners and final clarifiers requires the plant staff to spend an inordinate amount of time dealing with floatables. • The polymer batching system for the belt filter press needs to be repaired or replaced. • The overall level of day to day maintenance needs to increase. Path C R G kaiak use Greenwood WWTP • 10 operating staff (operates 7 days per week 8 hours per day). • Belt press operation is 5 to 6 days per week. • Grit and screenings facility are in disrepair and are difficult to operate (rags are a problem throughout the facility). • The primary clarifiers are in need of rehabilitation to improve reliability. • The aeration basins use coarse bubble diffusers and there is no aeration control. • SRT control methods at the facility should be reviewed and improved. • The DAF unit is currently being used as a sludge holding tank. Primary sludge is pumped here and WAS is pumped directly to the anaerobic digesters (thickening of WAS would increase digester capacity). There are some efficiencies to be released by re- instating sludge thickening. November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 22 Stantec LNV Laguna Madre WWTP • 8 operating staff (operates 7 days per week 8 hours per day - maximum number of staff 5). • Belt press operation is currently on an as needed basis. • The condition of the existing aeration equipment makes it difficult for the staff to maintain operational control. Failed valves and poor handrail and walkways make it difficult to access and operate the basins. • The aeration basins use fine bubble diffusers but there is no dissolved oxygen (DO) control or blower control. There are few variable speed drives used at the facility and those that exist, are run in manual. • A review of current SRT control practices is recommended. • Overall, the amount of day to day maintenance at the facility should increase. New Broadway WWTP • Currently, the facility has 11 employees. The facility is manned 8 hours per day, 7 days per week. The maximum staffing on any day is 5. • The centrifuge is operated 5 days per week. • The operations staff took over operation of the facility without the necessary vendor training and completion of the SCADA system, including some field sensors. • Some of the instrumentation, meant to promote better operation and operational efficiency, is not in working order. This appears to be a result of outstanding deficiencies from the construction phase. • New Broadway is the only facility to accept hauled waste. During our inspection, materials were dumped that may have caused the aeration DO levels to drop near zero. Oso WRP • The facility has 16 employees. The facility is manned 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. • Skid mounted pumps have been added at various locations throughout the plant to replace failed equipment, add additional capacity, or make process modifications. The headworks are atemporary arrangement with inadequate ventilation which poses a safety hazard for plant staff. • The grit and screenings facilities are generally ineffective in removing material from the influent. • The aeration basins use coarse bubble diffusers and there is no DO control or blower control. • The breakpoint chlorination is a very inefficient method of ammonia control and should be reviewed. • Overall, the amount of day to day maintenance should increase. Whitecap WWTP • Currently, the facility has 8 employees. The facility is manned 8 hours per day, 7 days per week. The maximum staffing on any day is 5. • The aeration basins use coarse bubble diffusers and there is no DO control or blower control. There are no variable speed drives used at the facility. • The staff operates the blowers at 100%. This is being done to keep the MLSS and heavier materials, not removed in preceding processes in suspension. MLSS was also being carried above normal in the basins. This practice adds additional costs to the process. • The staff cleans the UV system every day. This practice is labor intensive. The staff has found that the practice has decreased the likelihood of enterococcus limit failure. 1.1.4 Collection System Remediation The City completed a city wide hydraulic assessment of the wastewater collection system in 2015 to assist in identifying collection system infrastructure requiring remediation. The analysis results are summarized in the report entitled: "Wastewater Collection System Modelling and Recommendations Final Report" dated April 2015. Sewer lines larger than 10 -inches in diameter and smaller critical lines were modeled using field obtained survey data. All other lines were modelled assuming TCEQ minimum sewer slopes. The hydraulic assessment was based upon the 5 -year 24-hour storm. The hydraulic modeling identified potential capacity constraints and provided an estimate of the associated capital cost to eliminate these constraints through pipe replacement. The estimated pipe replacement cost was approximately $311 M based upon 2015 dollars. The report recommended that the identified capacity constraints undergo a remedial measures analysis that considers infiltration/inflow (I&I) reduction, monitoring, rehabilitation, maintenance, and flow diversion in addition to convey and treat. The City has embarked on a remedial measures analysis and implementation program to identify potential I&I reduction, rehabilitation, and maintenance needs. City staff believes the $311 M capital expenditure identified in the hydraulic analysis report is an upper bound on the remediation cost and has prepared a revised estimate for budgeting purposes. In order to arrive at a realistic remediation budget the City used historical SSO records in conjunction with previous utility department experience. The City compared the sewer system map showing historical SSO locations against the identified potential hydraulic constraints identified in the modeling exercise. Areas where the model predicted a sewer overflow in the design storm and where previous SSOs have been observed (referred to as Type I priorities) were identified for further consideration. Areas where the modeling predicted an overflow but it was not 23 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Haim C x halo TtscFc ise 6iG., , ._... clear if this was truly the result of a capacity constraint (referred to as Type II priorities) were also identified for further consideration. It was assumed that 95% and 75% of the Type I and Type II works would need to be completed based upon historical City experience. The resulting replacement cost for these projects is estimated at $195.5 M. In addition, the City has identified an overall budget of $148.1 M for capacity remediation that includes sewer rehabilitation (pipe lining and repair), ongoing sewer cleaning, and flow monitoring. The cash flow model for all options considered for this plan development therefore includes the following collection system expenditures: • Pipe Replacements - $195.5 M • Capacity Remediation - $148.1 M • Force mains - $14.3 M • Lift stations - $8.6 M The City has had a number of reported sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) over the last several years and also experienced apparent effluent permit non-compliance events at a number of their treatment facilities. The City is currently negotiating a settlement under a proposed Consent Decree with the state and federal government regarding the City's wastewater collection system and its wastewater treatment plants. The enforcement negotiations began with the issuance of six federal LNV ® Stantec administrative orders (one affiliated with each of the six WWTP discharge permits) in Fall 2011. The negotiations are currently still ongoing and based on having one overall Consent Decree, with both collection system remediation and remedial works at the plants incorporated into this proposed Consent Decree. 1.2. Future Requirements The optimal long-range strategy for the wastewater collection and treatment systems must address future requirements including future growth and regulatory requirements. Anticipated development and future population and flow projections are presented in Sections 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 respectively. Anticipated future regulatory requirements are summarized in Section 1.2.3. Future treatment requirements are presented here in Section 1.2.4. 1.2.1 Future Population Growth and Development Trends The US Census 2014 population estimate for the City of Corpus Christi is 320,438. A commonly used organization for population projection is the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB). Figure 1-8 below indicates the TWDB population forecast for the City of Corpus Christi every 10 years from 2020 to 2070. As shown in the figure, the population for the City is projected to grow to approximately 400,000 persons by around 2055. Figure 1-8 Population Projections for the City of Corpus Christi (2020 to 2070) 420,000 400,000 380.000 0 0 360,004 a 0 • - 3,40,000 3`40,000 320.000 300,000 City of Corpus Christi - Population Projections 40`l, 129 —6-2016 TWDB Population Projections for Carpus Christi 2020 2[730 2040 2050 2060 2070 Path C R G kalok use November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 24 Stantec LNV In order to distribute the anticipated population increase by service area, it is necessary to establish where and when growth is anticipated to occur. The City provided mapping of the expected growth areas in the City for the next 10, 20 and 30 years. These GIS maps were then overlaid on the wastewater service areas and the growth per area established for each of these 10 -year planning horizons. Details of the methodology are included in the Flow and Load Projection memorandum enclosed in Appendix B of this report. The expected development area and relative percent growth for each of the six existing sewer service areas is presented here in Table 1-16. It should be noted that all the wastewater service areas have different growth rates. Some wastewater service areas are limited in the amount of area available to be developed where other wastewater service areas have a large amount of area that is available for development. For example, it is anticipated by the year 2036 the Broadway WWTP service area will have been fully developed and the service area will not contribute any significant growth for the remaining years. On the other hand the Oso WRP has a large service area and is expected to be continually developed farther into the future as the City continues to grow and expand into its Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) area. Strong growth is anticipated in the Greenwood area, particularly in the middle decade under review. Slow initial growth is expected in the Allison service area, picking up considerably during the final decade of the review. The Laguna Madre and Whitecap areas are both expected to see steady modest growth throughout the 30 years. Table 1-16 Projected Growth by Existing Sewer Service Area Facility Allison 10 Years 20 Years 30 Years Growth (Acres) Percent Growth Growth (Acres) Percent Growth Growth (Acres) Percent Growth 569 7% 339 4% 2,594 31% Broadway 98 1% 279 3% - 0% Greenwood 1,456 17% 4,399 51% 1,187 14% Laguna Madre 848 10% 559 6% 1,257 15% Oso 4,843 56% 2,474 29% 2,244 26% Whitecap 777 9% 607 7% 1,205 14% Total 8,590 100% 8,656 100% 8,488 100% Using the percentage area growth by service area, a population growth estimate was developed for each service area in 5 year increments. The projected population by existing sewer service area is presented here in Table 1-17. Table 1-17 Projected Population by Sewer Service Area Year Facility Allison 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 29,926 30,826 31,726 32,312 32,898 35,774 38,650 40,334 Broadway 38,926 39,082 39,237 39,720 40,202 40,202 40,202 40,202 Greenwood 56,003 58,305 60,607 68,215 75,823 77,139 78,455 79,226 Laguna Madre 19,891 21,232 22,572 23,538 24,505 25,898 27,292 28,109 Oso 151,890 159,549 167,207 171,486 175,765 178,254 180,742 182,199 Whitecap 11,849 13,078 14,307 15,356 16,406 17,742 19,078 19,860 Total 308,485 322,071 335,657 350,628 365,599 375,010 384,420 389,930 25 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse LNV ® Stantec 1.2.2 Projected Flow and Load The annual average flow projections for each facility were derived using the population projection described above and an estimate of the future per capita flow. In order to bracket the potential flow estimates, two levels of per capita flows were used. An upper bound flow estimate was developed based on the highest annual average per capita flow observed in each applicable service area. This HIGH estimate is shown in Table 1-18 and results in a total annual average wastewater capacity requirement by 2045 of approximately 40 MGD. Table 1-18 Flow Projection by Service Area (MGD) - High Estimated Flow by Year (MGD) Facility Allison Per capita flow (gpcd) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 100 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.0 Broadway 110 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 Greenwood 110 6.4 6.7 7.5 8.3 8.5 8.6 8.7 Laguna Madre 100 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 Oso 100 16.0 16.7 17.1 17.6 17.8 18.1 18.2 Whitecap 110 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.2 Total 32.3 33.3 34.7 36.3 37.9 38.9 39.8 40.4 A second, lower bound estimate was developed using the average per capita flow observed over the last three years. This LOW estimate is shown in Table 1-19 and shows a total annual average wastewater capacity requirement by 2045 of approximately 34 MGD. Table 1-19 Flow Projection by Service Area (MGD) - Low Facility Estimated Flow by Year (MGD) Per capr'd flow (gpcd) 2015 2.8 2020 2.9 2025 2.9 2030 3.0 2035 3.2 2040 3.5 2045 3.6 Allison 90 Broadway 104 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 Greenwood 99 5.8 6.0 6.8 7.5 7.6 7.8 7.8 Laguna Madre 78 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 Oso 76 12.1 12.7 13.0 13.4 13.5 13.7 13.8 Whitecap 95 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 Total 27.6 28.8 30.1 31.5 32.3 33.1 33.6 It should be noted that these projections assume that growth density in each of the service areas will be of a similar mix of population per acre and that the flow per capita will remain in a similar range as the recent historical averages. These simplifications are considered appropriate for the purposes of this planning study, but a more rigorous estimate of flow projections would be needed before design of any new facilities. Using the flow projections developed above, an assessment was made for each facility of the timing for necessary plant expansions. Currently the combined average annual wastewater flow to the six facilities is approximately 30 MGD and the current design capacity for the six WWTPs is 42.7 MGD. Table 1-20, shows the current (2015) flows as compared to the design capacity. Path C R kailo "` TischlerSise G November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 26 Stantec LNV Table 1-20 Current Facility Capacities Now and in 2035 Facility Allison Existing Capacity (MGD) Actual 2015 Flow % of Capacity ADF (MGD) 2 -HR Peak (MGD) ADF (MGD) % of Capacity High Low Estimate Estimate 5.0 15.0 2.7 55% 64% 72% Broadway 8.0 20.0 4.3 54% 52% 55% Greenwood 8.0 24.0 6.3 79% 95% 106% Laguna Madre 3.0 9.0 2.1 69% 67% 86% Oso 16.2 98 13.3 82% 84% 110% Whitecap 2.5 7.5 1.4 56% 67% 78% Totals 42.7 193.5 30.1 According to the Texas Administrative Code (TAC) 305.126(a) "whenever flow measurements for any sewage treatment plant facility in the state reaches 75 percent of the permitted average daily or annual average flow for three consecutive months, the permittee must initiate engineering and financial planning for expansion and/or upgrading of the wastewater treatment and/or collection facilities." Currently Greenwood WWTP and Oso WRP are beyond the 75 percent threshold and planning will have to take place to satisfy the TAC 305.126(a) ruling. The anticipated priority for facility expansion based solely on current flow projections is therefore: Oso, Greenwood, Laguna Madre, Whitecap, and Allison. On completion, we are not anticipating Broadway will require expansion within the next 20 to 30 years. 1.2.3 Future Regulatory Requirements The existing treatment facilities will be required to meet future regulatory requirements in addition to accommodating flow and load increases associated with development. We are anticipating future effluent nutrient limits i.e for total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP), as the most pressing and likely change to existing effluent requirements. These future limits are expected to eventually impact awastewater effluent discharge into all of the existing or potential receivers including: Oso Creek, Oso Bay, Laguna Madre, Nueces River, Nueces Bay, Corpus Christi Bay, as well as the Ship Channel. Currently, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) has issued permit limits for TN or TP for a small fraction of the Texas permittees. These limits are based on the protection of narrative water quality standards, not numeric standards. Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (TSWQS) regulate nutrients as follows: "Nutrients from permitted discharges or other controllable sources must not cause excessive growth of aquatic vegetation that impairs an existing designated, presumed, or attainable use. Site-specific nutrient criteria, nutrient permit limitations, or separate rules to control nutrients in individual watersheds are established where appropriate after notice and opportunity for public participation and proper hearing. Site-specific numeric criteria related to chlorophyll a are listed in Appendix F of §307.10 of this title." The TSWQS do not currently include numeric nutrient criteria for the receiving waters of the City's WWTPs. A change in water quality standards that includes numeric nutrient standards for the City's WWTP receiving waters would increase the likelihood that nutrient permit limits are incorporated in some or all of the existing WWTPs permits and any new WWTPs being considered in the alternatives. For the existing WWTPs, nutrient limits would require significant investment to modify or add treatment units to consistently remove nutrients from the wastewater. At this time TCEQ has not proposed additional numeric nutrient standards for the 2017 standards revision. In previous standards revision cycles, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the TCEQ have focused on numeric standards for chlorophyll -a in freshwater reservoirs. Today, some of the State's reservoirs have chlorophyll -a standards, but many still do not. Since these standards were adopted, both the EPA and TCEQ have stepped back from the focus on nutrients. At this time, the TCEQ is still working on its approaches to nutrient standards for reservoirs, rivers, and bays/estuaries. We believe that it will still be some time before the TCEQ or EPAwill be able to effectively adopt nutrient standards in bays, estuaries, or tidal segments as are found in the Corpus Christi area. Whether TCEQ would issue TN limits, TP limits or limits for both TN and TP for the City's WWTPs is unknown. However, such limits are anticipated to begin to appear in permits discharging to marine waters in the next 10 to 15 years. Nitrogen is usually considered the controlling nutrient in saltwater bodies, so nitrogen would likely be the initial focus of such limits. In addition, it might be expected that a moderate range of controls would be implemented initially, such as 8 milligrams per liter (mg/L) TN and 1 mg/L TP. Over subsequent permitting cycles and water quality standards revisions, such limits might be reduced in at least some of the larger discharges or for discharges to more sensitive water bodies. For Texas, a lower limit on TN of around 3 mg/L might be expected. Limits on TP might drop to around 0.3 mg/L, where deemed necessary to protect receiving water bodies. A more extensive review of future potential regulatory requirements, biosolids management, and odor control management are enclosed here in Appendix C, D, and E. 27 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 tir Rm mc G kaifo �` Tischi era LNV ® Stantec 1.2.4 Future Treatment Requirements The most significant aspect of the treatment requirements evaluation is that all or most of the WWTPs will likely be subject to nutrient limits in the foreseeable future. We are anticipating that moderate nutrient limits would be implemented initially with limits becoming increasingly stringent with time. We would anticipate initial total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) limits of 8 mg/L and 1 mg/L respectively with limits eventually being lowered to limit of technology levels (TN < 3 mg/L and TP <0.3 mg/L). We are anticipating the most sensitive receivers, and the associated treatment facilities, will receive nutrient limits first including Oso Creek, Nueces Bay and estuary, and Oso Bay. This is expected to be followed by the Laguna Madre and Ship Channel over time. Biosolids management at the six (6) city wastewater facilities consists of aerobic digestion, biosolids dewatering, and trucking to landfill disposal. We are anticipating the current practice will not change under the status quo. However, consolidation at a larger plant site or sites would allow an opportunity to implement anaerobic digestion and realize the associated energy recovery and lower operating costs. The anticipated biosolids treatment train at the consolidation sites would include sludge thickening, anaerobic digestion, centrifuge dewatering, and dewatered cake storage. The overarching direction of the wastewater industry is towards increased levels of treatment and resource recovery. Newer plants are typically designed to maximize resource recovery through biogas production and installation of a combined heat and power (CHP) system. We are anticipating the pressure to maximize effluent reuse will continue and anticipate industrial reuse will eventually be implemented. Current EPA regulatory initiatives such as the implementation of effluent viral limits will require increased disinfection limits. The land area requirements for all new plant sites should therefore be sufficient to accommodate these future anticipated initiatives. The projected treatment requirements by plant site are summarized here in Tables 2-21 through 2-23. Table 1-21 Anticipated Future Nutrient Removal Requirements Plant Site Allison (existing plant) Anticipated Nutrient Requirements 0-5 year 5-10 year 10-20 year 20+ years none none TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<3 mg/L, TP<0.3 mg/L Allison (new consolidated plant site) TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<3 mg/L, TP<0.3 mg/L Broadway none none none none Greenwood TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<3 mg/L, TP<0.3 mg/L Oso TN<8 mg/L, TP<1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<3 mg/L, TP<0.3 mg/L Laguna Madre (existing plant) none none none none Laguna Madre (new consolidated plant site) TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<3 mg/L, TP<0.3 mg/L Whitecap none none none none Southwest Site TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<3 mg/L, TP<0.3 mg/L Southeast Site TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<3 mg/L, TP<0.3 mg/L North Site TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<3 mg/L, TP<0.3 mg/L nate C R G kaiakTisch &use November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 28 Stantec LNV Total nitrogen and phosphorus limits of 8 mg/L and 1 mg/L respectively can be met via a number of conventional biological nutrient removal (BNR) technologies including the Modified Ludzack-Ettinger (MLE) process with chemical phosphorus removal, 3 -stage Bardenpho, 5 -Stage Bardenpho, and Modified Johannesbourg (MJB) processes to name but a few. We are assuming the City would install a 3 -stage Bardenpho or MJB process at those plants needing to meet these limits for the purposes of this report. The lower effluent limits of < 3 mg/L and <0.3 mg/L nitrogen and phosphorus respectively would require exogenous carbon addition and effluent filtration. We are assuming the required process would include post denitrification filters with methanol addition. Table 1-22 Anticipated Biosolids Management Approach Plant Site Allison (existing plant) Anticipated Biosolids Management Approach Sludge Thickening Digestion Sludge Dewatering Energy Recovery Gravity thickener Aerobic Belt Press None Allison (new consolidated plant site) Rotary Drum Thickener Anaerobic Centrifuge Yes (CHP) New Broadway Gravity Thickener Aerobic Centrifuge None Greenwood Rotary Drum Thickener Anaerobic Centrifuge Yes (CHP) Oso (upgraded and expanded) Gravity Thickener Anaerobic Belt Press Yes (CHP) Laguna Madre (existing plant) None Aerobic Belt Press No Laguna Madre (new consolidated plant site) Rotary Drum Thickener Anaerobic Centrifuge Yes (CHP) Whitecap None Aerobic Belt Press No Southwest Site Rotary Drum Thickener Anaerobic Centrifuge Yes (CHP) Southeast Site Rotary Drum Thickener Anaerobic Centrifuge Yes (CHP) North Site Rotary Drum Thickener Anaerobic Centrifuge Yes (CHP) The option for maintaining treatment at the existing sites requires flood proofing of the existing Greenwood WWTP site. A review of the associated costs suggests it is most appropriate to build a new flood proofed Greenwood WWTP on the Greenwood site adjacent the existing plant facility. As indicated above, all new plants would include anaerobic digestion facilities due to lower operating costs and associated benefit associated with energy recovery. Further, all new plant sites would include an allowance for resource recovery operations. 29 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse LNV Stantec Table 1-23 Anticipated Resource Recovery Systems Plant Site Anticipated Resource Recovery Effluen euse Phosphorus Recovery none Energy Recovery none Potential Biosolids Amendment none Allison (existing plant) none Allison (new consolidated plant site) Yes Yes Yes Yes Broadway none none none none Greenwood Yes Yes Yes Yes Oso Yes (1) none none none Laguna Madre (existing plant) none none none none Laguna Madre (new consolidated plant site) Yes Yes Yes Yes Whitecap none none none none Southwest Site Yes Yes Yes Yes Southeast Site Yes (1) Yes Yes Yes North Site Yes Yes Yes Yes (1) - It is assumed effluent reuse will be limited from these sites and confined to non -industrial uses due to the significant distance from the respective site to existing heavy industry. 1.3. Stakeholders and Stakeholder Input The consultant team and City staff conducted three open house events and several individual stakeholder meetings during the course of this study. The open houses were conducted in "drop-in" format in order to accommodate availability of the public. The three open houses were operated for approximately 5 to 6 hours from early afternoon to early evening. The purpose and objectives of these meetings are summarized here in Table 1-24. Informational materials were presented on display boards at each open house. Comment sheets were provided at each meeting and the project team also set up a project specific web site www.ccwastewaterstudy.com that displayed project information. Stakeholders provided comments on the project at the meetings by submitting written comments directly to project staff and/or through the project web site at their leisure. The project team prepared an initial stakeholders list at the start of the project which was updated throughout the project duration. The project team sent out targeted invites to project stakeholders in advance of each open house. Along with the targeted invites, the project team used several platforms to promote the public open house: • Existing City social media sites • E -newsletter - Utilized existing Plan CC 2035 address list (similar target audience) • City public access Channel 19 • Digital advertising through Caller Times and Facebook • City staff employee newsletter and notice to all department heads • Promotional assistance by local community/civic organizations to increase reach to the public • Flyers at City facilities such as libraries, senior centers and recreational centers Path C R G kaiakTisch &use November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 30 Stantec LNV The media strategy for each event included the following elements: • Media pitch in advance of each open house: Caller Times, KRIS -TV, KIII-TV, KZTV, KORO -TV Nueces County Record Star and the Corpus Christi Business News. • Media advisory sent in advance of each open house: Announcing meeting prior to meeting date as invite to briefing. • Media briefings were held one hour prior to each open house to allow media dedicated time with City staff and materials and interviews. Table 1-24 Stakeholder Engagement Meetings Meeting Number Meeting Description Date Meeting Objective 1 Open House 1 March 24, 2016 • Make the stakeholders aware of the study and the study objectives. • Assist in identifying stakeholder groups and their respective comments and concerns. • Collect stakeholder input on the study objectives and approach. 2 Meeting with Chamber of Commerce April 8, 2016 • Inform Chamber of Commerce members on purpose of study, proposed approach and schedule and update them on progress to date. 3 Open House 2 May 26, 2016 • Update stakeholders on progress made on the study. • Present options under consideration and receive stakeholder input on both the options and proposed assessment methodology. 4 Port Industries Meetin g June 23, 2016 • Update local industry on the project progress. • Discuss requirements for and industry interest in reuse water for industrial purposes. 5 Coastal Bend Bay & Estuaries Program June 29, 2016 • Update program staff on project progress. • Review program staff's specific concerns associated with maintaining return flows to the Nueces Bay and delta and the potential impact industrial reuse may have on these flows. 6 Greenwood Community Meeting July 7, 2016 • Update neighbors of the Greenwood WWTP site on the project progress. • Review alternative plans for the Greenwood site and receive comments on the project from local residents. 7 Flour Bluff Community Meeting July 14, 2016 • Update neighbors of the Laguna Madre WWTP site on the project progress. • Review alternative plans for the Laguna Madre site and receive comments on the project from local residents. 8 Oso Community Meeting July 20, 2016 • Update neighbors of the Oso WRP site on the project progress. • Review alternative plans for the Oso WRP site and receive comments on the project from local residents. 9 Open House 3 July 28, 2016 • Update stakeholders on options under consideration. • Present pre-screening and evaluation methodology for short listed options. • Present preliminary recommendation and associated rationale. • Provide an opportunity for stakeholders to comment on the recommended alternative and the project in general. 10 WE AT/ TAWWA Joint Meeting August 4, 2016 • Present study purpose and objectives to local engineering community. • Present preliminary recommendation and associated rationale. Copies of the handouts, questionnaires, and comments received from each of the open house and neighborhood meetings are provided on the project web site: www.ccwastewaterstudy.com. 31 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 C R kali©'` Tischl reBEse• The key concerns expressed by the public during the open houses and stakeholder engagement meetings included: • Minimizing user rates. • Addressing the flooding issues at the Greenwood WWTP and in the community adjacent the plant. • Maintaining environmental base flows in specific receiving streams particularly the Nueces River and Bay and the Blind Oso. • Addressing odor and nuisance issues associated with the Oso WRP. • Providing a plan that addresses future growth south of Oso Creek. Key stakeholder concerns and how these were accounted for in the servicing options development and selection are summarized in Section 1.4.4. The plan for stakeholder management for future phases of the project is addressed here in Section 2.5. 1.4. Summary of Existing Constraints A number of constraints need to be considered when developing future potential servicing options and prior to selection of a preferred wastewater servicing plan. The LNV ® Stantec consulting team conducted several background studies to identify constraints. These, along with stakeholder comments, served as critical input to developing the recommended servicing plan. 1.4.1 Pending Consent Decree The City of Corpus Christi is currently in negotiations with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding the city's wastewater system. The DOJ and EPA are alleging Corpus Christi violated the Clean Water Act (CWA) with sewer overflows, and a settlement is being negotiated for wastewater improvements. 1.4.2 Existing Treatment Plant Site Capacities The project team considered a number of potential wastewater servicing options for the City. One of the objectives of the study was to identify and confirm the potential to service some or all of the existing wastewater treatment facilities at one or more sites. Consolidating treatment operations at fewer wastewater facilities is expected to reduce annual O&M costs. One of the first steps in this analysis involved looking at each of the existing sites to confirm current site constraints and available site capacity. The results of these analyses are presented here in Table 1-25. Table 1-25 Site Capacity of Existing Wastewater Treatment Plants Plant Current Plant Capacity (MGD) Estimated Capacity Requirement (MGD) - 2045 Estimated Site Capacity (MGD) Summary of Site Constraints Oso WRP 16.2 18.2 24 • None noted Greenwood WWTP 8 8.7 24 • Existing plant located in the flood plain. • Sustaining capital spend over next 15 + years is approximately equal the cost of plant replacement. Allison 5 4 73 • The City owns a considerable amount of land adjacent the site. New Broadway 8 4.4 8 • None noted. Laguna Madre 3 2.8 30 • The city owns a considerable amount of land adjacent the site. • Aportion of the site is susceptible to flooding. The estimated site capacity accounts for the impact of the flood plain on site capacity. Whitecap 2.5 2.2 5 • None noted. Rrh C R G kaiakTisch &use November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 32 Stantec `NV 1.4.3 Summary of Existing System Constraints Several critical constraints need to be considered when developing the final wastewater servicing plan. The City has identified their key priorities as follows: • Meet regulatory compliance at all times. • Minimize user rates as much as practically possible. • Minimize capital and operating and maintenance (O&M) costs. • Provide drought resistant water to industry • Meet needs for planned development The key constraints to meeting these objectives and the way in which they were addressed in this study are summarized in Table 1-26. Table 1-26 Summary of Key Constraints and Approach to Addressing These Stakeholder Group Issue/Constraint Approach to Addressing Issue/Constraint City/Public Continued flooding at Greenwood WWTP • Build a new 'flood proof' treatment facility on the Greenwood site or transfer Greenwood flows to a new plant. • Transfer some flows from the periphery of the Greenwood to the Broadway service area to reduce flows going to the Greenwood WWTP. • Conduct remedial works in La Volla Creek to reduce flooding potential in the Creek. • Reduce Inflow/Infiltration (I/I) to reduce peak flow into the collection system City/Public High sustaining capital spend required for existing plants. • Prioritize capital projects at each plant and identify appropriate timing to spread out required cash flow. • Consolidate plants with high sustaining capital spend as quickly as possible. City/Public Minimize impact upon user rates • Assume New Broadway WWTP will be in service beyond the 2045 time horizon and transfer additional flow to plant to maximize value from facility. • Assume Whitecap WWTP will stay in service for foreseeable future due to long simple payback period. • Identify operational savings associated with the operation of the existing wastewater treatment facilities reducing costs even under the status quo. • Evaluate several consolidation options and identify options that provide optimal balance between lower O&M cost savings and most attractive capital cost spend. City Uncertainty around future of Oso WRP effluent discharge. • Identify and evaluate options that provide flexibility to consolidate Oso WRP now or at a later time. City Significant potential development south of Oso Creek. • Plan all options so that developments south of Oso Creek can be accommodated in future as/if required. City Collection system rehabilitation and upgrades required to support Consent Decree. • All options considered include upgrades and rehabilitation of collection system. City/Public Odor and other nuisance issues associated with Oso WRP. • All future servicing options considered include upgrading Oso WRP to address nuisance concerns and/or decommissioning of the facility. 33 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rein C R G kala* Tisch rise Stakeholder Group City Public Public Issue/Constraint Supply drought proof water supply for industry. Public does not want to pay for industrial reuse water out of residential sewer use rates. Members of the public concerned about the potential loss of aquatic habitat should the Oso WRP be taking out of service. LNV ( Stantec Approach to Addressing Issue/Constraint • Future servicing options considered included preliminary plans for providing reuse water to industry. • The capital and O&M costs of industrial reuse were not included in the CIP associated with wastewater user rates. • All industrial reuse capital and O&M costs will be paid solely by the benefitting industries. • City is considering construction of a small scalping plant at the Oso site to provide minimal flow to the blind Oso should the plant be taken out of service. The City would like to provide a drought proof water supply for industry using treated wastewater effluent. The Port Industries group made it clear that they are interested in receiving treated effluent if it meets their process requirements and is provided at a cost equal to or less than potable water. Members of the public voiced concerns that user rates would be used to subsidize industrial reuse water. City staff instructed the consulting team to estimate the capital and O&M cost of additional treatment to support industrial reuse for each of the servicing options under consideration. The city will develop a unit cost of reuse water that includes capital recovery and present the cost to industry. Reuse facilities will be constructed once the appropriate long term contracts have been executed with industry. The consulting team assumed the City would provide a minimum of 10 MGD of industrial reuse water within the next 10 -years using reverse osmosis treatment to reduce chloride levels. 1.5. Identification of the Preferred Wastewater Servicing Option 1.5.1 Introduction The plant upgrading and consolidation options considered for this study are presented here in Sections 1.5.2 and 1.5.3. Capital and O&M cost assumptions, estimates, and sensitivity analyses are covered in Section 1.5.4. Prescreening criteria and the results of the options pre- screening are presented in Section 1.5.5. The recommended servicing option and alternatives for improving upon this option are presented here in Section 1.5.6. "lath C R kailo "` TischlerBise G 1.5.2 Future Plant Siting Options To evaluate the potential benefit for future wastewater servicing options, a City wide review was undertaken of the current and potential new sites for locating wastewater treatment facilities. In selecting suitable treatment sites the following issues were taken into consideration: • Existing locations have advantages of existing capital investments; the precedent created by existing neighbors; and established connection to the existing wastewater collection network. • New locations must have adequate open contiguous land areas that provide at least 50 to 80 acres of available land. • Neighboring land uses can have a significant impact on the value of vacant land as well as the level of mitigation and buffers needed to avoid nuisance impacts on the public. • Ideally, new sites would be located closer to projected growth areas to match future wastewater flows. November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 34 Stantec LNV • New sites must either be near a potential discharge location or must have opportunity to connect to a suitable discharge point. The level of treatment required at a new plant will be materially impacted by the assimilative capacity of the receiving stream at the discharge location. • Sites need to be free from significant servicing or environmental constraints such as flooding potential, wetlands, railway/ highway corridors, and utility easements for gas pipelines or high voltage electrical lines. An initial desk top survey was undertaken of the larger tracks of land surrounding the existing wastewater service areas. This looked at opportunities for new sites generally located to the north, west and south of the City's built up core. It should be noted that review of potential sites was based on identifying land areas that were under developed or vacant using current aerial mapping. No land ownership records were sourced, nor were any specific parcels identified at this stage of the plan development. Identification of specific land parcel(s) leading to future options or land procurement is not included in this scope and would be completed by the City once a preferred wastewater management plan is established. Following the desktop screening, a physical street by street survey was undertaken to confirm likely candidate sites. From this field survey, the following three potential new plant sites were identified: North Site A new potential treatment plant site has been identified in the northwest quadrant of the City between the CC International Airport and the I-37 highway. This is a suitable area for a number of reasons: • This site can readily be reached by future transfer of flows from Allison, Greenwood and Broadway service areas. • A discharge to the Ship Channel is the most practical outlet for the wastewater effluent; however, an effluent discharge to Oso Creek and Nueces River and delta would also be feasible from this site. Treated reuse water could be provided from this location to neighboring industries. • There are large open areas available generally between Agnes St (Rte 44) and Leopard St. For costing of conveyance options, a future plant site has been assumed to be located along Sedwick Rd. • The existing land use in this area is mostly agricultural or industrial which is generally compatible with wastewater operations. Southwest Site A new potential treatment plant site has been identified in the southwest quadrant of the City south of Oso Creek in the vicinity of the Crosstown Expressway (Hwy 286) which is currently being extended southward by TxDOT. This is a suitable area for a number of reasons: • This site can readily be accessed by future transfer of flows from Greenwood service area and the significant future development expected south of Oso Creek. • A discharge to Oso Creek is the most practical outlet for the wastewater effluent. • The existing land use in this area is mixed, with some institutional uses, some residential and the remainder currently agricultural. • There are large open areas available and, for costing of conveyance options, a future plant site has been assumed to be located along Hwy 286 midway between Weber Rd and South Staples Rd. Southeast Site A new potential treatment plant site has been identified in the southeast quadrant of the City in the vicinity of Yorktown Blvd. to the north of Oso Creek. This is a suitable area for a number of reasons: • This site can readily be accessed by future transfer of flows from the Greenwood, Oso and Laguna Madre service areas as well as the significant future development expected south of Oso Creek. • A discharge to Oso Creek at the head of Oso Bay is the most practical outlet for the wastewater effluent. • There is currently vacant land available, including a City owned parcel at Starry Lane south of Yorktown Blvd. For costing of conveyance options, a future plant site has been assumed to be located along Starry Lane. These three sites, together with various combinations of the existing treatment plant sites were considered in developing the potential future wastewater servicing options discussed in the next section. 1.5.3 General Wastewater Servicing Options Using the existing constraints as a guide, 10 wastewater servicing options were developed to address the following City priorities: 1. Meeting regulatory compliance 2. Minimize wastewater user rates 3. Reduce longterm Operating and Maintenance (O&M) and capital costs 4. Provide for future drought resistant water to industry 5. Meet future needs for planned development 35 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 nein G kaiak Trsciilerjse LNV ® Stantec The servicing options were primarily aimed at establishing the best location, or combination of locations, for the future wastewater treatment plants. Collection system impacts within each of the service areas were not a primary determining factor since these would be required regardless of the consolidation options being considered. The Broadway WWTP and Whitecap WWTP were considered to stay in operation for the foreseeable future for all of the options considered. However, servicing options that facilitate future consolidation of both Broadway and Whitecap were viewed more favorably in the options evaluation. The city has recently completed construction of the Broadway WWTP. This new facility, once optimized, should provide cost effective treatment over the next 20 plus years. At this point we are assuming the City will continue to operate the Broadway facility for at least the next 20 years while they focus on other more pressing issues associated with the existing wastewater treatment plants. The costs to consolidate the Whitecap WWTP is estimated at approximately $30 M. This cost includes a pumping station and pipeline to the Laguna Madre WWTP where it is assumed there would be a new plant to accept the flow or a pumping station to pump the Whitecap flow on to an upgraded and expanded Oso WRP. The estimated capital cost to pump the Whitecap flows to a new Southeast facility are also in the vicinity of $30 M. The maximum potential O&M saving associated with consolidating Whitecap flow at a larger regional facility would be approximately $500,000 per year. The minimum estimated simple payback period to recoup the consolidation costs would therefore be greater than 50 years. The city should reassess the feasibility of consolidation should conditions change. Category 1- Maintain all Existing sites 2 - Consolidate at Existing Plant sites 3 - Consolidate at New Plant site Table 1-27 Wastewater Servicing Options Description • Keep six sites. Replace Greenwood on same site. Continue with current operations and planned maintenance. • Keep Broadway & Whitecap. • Consolidate remainder at two of the existing plant sites. • Keep Broadway & Whitecap. • Consolidate remainder at one new plant site. Options • 1- Maintain Existing Sites • 2A - Allison + Laguna Madre • 2B - Allison + Oso • 3A - North site • 3B - Southwest site • 3C - Southeast site 4- Combination of New and Existing • Keep Broadway & Whitecap. • Consolidate remainder at two sites with at least one new site plus an existing site. • 4A - North + Laguna Madre • 4B - Southwest + Laguna Madre • 4C - North + Southeast • 4D - North + Oso For each of the wastewater servicing options, required project elements were identified to enable meeting the primary servicing goals. The diagram of the major elements for each identified option plus the necessary capital project elements are summarized as follows. Path C R kailo "` TischlerBise G November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 36 Stantec LNV 1.5.3.1 Option 1 - Maintain All Existing Sites Option 1 involves expansion and repair of the six (6) existing wastewater treatment facilities. The system configuration under Option 1 is presented here as Figure 1-9. Figure 1-9 Option 1 System Configuration Laguna Madre Legend iiExpand Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant —> Reuse Pipeline 2.5 5 14 37 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 C R kali©'` Tischl reBEse• LNV ® Stantec The wastewater generation potential for planned developments south of Oso Creek is expected to be approximately 20 MGD. Therefore, we would anticipate that under Option 1 a seventh wastewater treatment plant may need to be constructed in future. Two options were evaluated for the Greenwood WWTP including upgrading, flood proofing, and expanding the existing plant. The recommended option is construction of a new 10 MGD `flood proof' WWTP on the existing plant site. The key infrastructure requirements under option 1 over the next 30 -years are presented here as Table 1-28. Option 1 (maintain all existing sites) was the benchmark against which all other options have been evaluated. Table 1-28 Summary of Infrastructure Requirements for Option 1 Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Repair over next 20 years • Upgrade to BNR in 10 years • Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Build new 10 MGD `flood proof' facility • Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years Oso • Repair plant over next 20 years • Upgrade plant to BNR in next 5 years • Expand plant to 20 MGD in next 8 to 10 years. Laguna Madre • Repair over next 20 years Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years The new 10 MGD Greenwood WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-29. Table 1-29 Proposed Unit Operations for New 10 MGD Greenwood WWTP Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 2 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 2 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 3 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 3 BNRbioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 3 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 3 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 2 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 3 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation 1.5.3.2 Option 2A - Consolidation at Allison and Laguna Madre Option 2A involves the consolidation of existing plant flows at the Allison and Laguna Madre WWTP sites. Oso and Greenwood would be taken out of service under this alternative and Broadway and Whitecap would stay in service for the foreseeable future although they could be consolidated at a later time. The system configuration under Option 2A is presented here as Figure 1-10. Path C R kali() " TischlerSise G November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 38 Stantec LNV Figure 1-10 Option 2A System Configuration i N Legend Sit Close Treatment Plant * Repair Treatment Plant 10 Expand Treatment Plant 4. Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline Laguna Madre The key infrastructure requirements under Option 2A over the next 30 -years are presented here as Table 1-30. Table 1-30 Summary of Infrastructure Requirements under Option 2A Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Construct a new 12 MGD facility at the Allison site in the next 5 years. • Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to Allison. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years Oso • Repair plant over next 10 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 10 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Oso plant to transfer wastewater from Oso to the new Laguna Madre facility. Laguna Madre • Repair the existing plant over the next 10 years • Build a new 20 MGD plant at the Laguna Madre site to take flows from Laguna Madre and Oso. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years 39 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Barri C R kali©'` Tischl reBEse• LNV Stantec The new 12 MGD Allison WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-31. Table 1-31 Proposed Unit Operations for New 12 MGD Allison WWTP Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 2 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 2 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 3 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 3 BNRbioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 3 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 3 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 2 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 3 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation The new 20 MGD Laguna Madre WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-32. Table 1-32 Proposed Unit Operations for new 20 MGD Laguna Madre WWTP Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 4 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 4 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 4 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 4 BNRbioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 4 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 4 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 4 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 4 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation Path C R G kaiok use November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 40 Stantec LNV 1.5.3.3 Option 2B - Consolidation at Allison and Oso Option 2B involves the consolidation of existing plant flows at the Allison and Oso sites. Laguna Madre and Greenwood would be taken out of service under this alternative and Broadway and Whitecap would stay in service for the foreseeable future although they could be consolidated at a later time. The system configuration under Option 2B over the next 30 years is presented here as Figure 1-11. Figure 1-11 Option 2B System Configuration IT Legend Close Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant Expand Treatment Plant Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline 2.6 The key infrastructure requirements under the Option 2B are presented here as Table 1-33. Table 1-33 Summary of Infrastructure Requirements under Option 2B Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Construct a new 12 MGD facility at the Allison site in the next 5 years. • Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to Allison. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years Oso • Repair plant over next 20 years • Expand plant capacity to 20 MGD and upgrade to BNR. Laguna Madre • Repair the existing plant over the next 10 years • Build a new pumping station at the Laguna Madre site and transfer wastewater from Laguna Madre to the Oso site. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years 41 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 C x kali©' Tischl reuse" LNV ® Stantec 1.5.3.4 Option 3A - Consolidate at a new North Plant Site Option 3A involves the consolidation of existing plant flows at a new North treatment plant site. Allison, Oso, Laguna Madre and Greenwood would be taken out of service under this alternative and Broadway and Whitecap would stay in service for the foreseeable future although they could be consolidated at a later time. The system configuration under Option 3A is presented here as Figure 1-12. f3 Figure 1-12 Option 3A System Configuration Minton roadway Corpus furan Bey Oso Legend New Treatment Plant Close Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant Wastewater Pipeline -• Reuse Pipeline Laguna Madre 0 2.6 S 4a 60u <7„/ /7:///4 The key infrastructure requirements under the Option 3A over the next 30 years are presented here as Table 1-34. nate C x kail©'' Tischl re Bose November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 42 Stantec LNV Table 1-34 Summary of Infrastructure Requirements under Option 3A Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Repair over next 15 years • Decommission the plant after 15 -years and build new pumping station to direct flows to the new North treatment plant. Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to the new North treatment plant site. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years North Treatment Plant • Build new 32 MGD North WWTP in the 0 to 5 year time period. Oso • Repair plant over next 10 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 0 to 10 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Oso plant to transfer wastewater from Oso to the new North treatment plant. Laguna Madre • Repair over next 20 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 0 to 20 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Laguna Madre plant to transfer wastewater from Laguna Madre to the new North treatment plant. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years The new 32 MGD North Site WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-35. Table 1-35 Proposed Unit Operations for New 32 MGD North Site WWTP Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 6 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 6 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 6 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 6 BNR bioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 6 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 6 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 6 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 6 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation 43 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse LNV ® Stantec 1.5.3.5 Option 3B - Consolidate at a new Southwest Plant Site Option 3B involves the consolidation of existing plant flows at a single Southwest WWTP site. Allison, Oso, Laguna Madre and Greenwood would be taken out of service under this alternative and Broadway and Whitecap would stay in service for the foreseeable future although they could be consolidated at a later time. The system configuration under Option 3B is presented here as Figure 1-13. Figure 1-13 Option 3B System Configuration Legend New Treatment Plant Close Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant —> Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline z.s Laguna Madre 1ft 14114 The key infrastructure requirements under the Option 3B over the next 30 years are presented here as Table 1-36. Path C R G kaiok Tisch &use November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 44 Stantec LNV Table 1-36 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 3B Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Repair over next 15 years • Decommission the plant after 15 -years and build new pumping station to direct flows to the new Southwest treatment plant. Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to the new Southwest treatment plant site. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years New Southwest Treatment Plant • Build new 35 MGD Southwest Treatment plant in the 0 to 5 year period. Oso • Repair plant over next 10 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 0 to 10 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Oso plant to transfer wastewater from Oso to the new Southwest treatment plant. Laguna Madre • Repair over next 20 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 20 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Laguna Madre plant to transfer wastewater from Laguna Madre to the new Southwest treatment plant. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years The new 35 MGD Southwest WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-37. Table 1-37 Proposed Unit Operations for New 35 MGD Southwest WWTP Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 6 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 6 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 6 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 6 BNR bioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 6 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 6 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 6 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 6 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation 45 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse LNV ® Stantec 1.5.3.6 Option 3C - Consolidate at a new Southeast Plant Site Option 3C involves the consolidation of existing plant flows at a single Southeast WWTP site. Allison, Oso, Laguna Madre and Greenwood would be taken out of service under this alternative and Broadway and Whitecap would stay in service for the foreseeable future although they could be consolidated at a later time. The system configuration under Option 3C is presented here as Figure 1-14. Figure 1-14 Option 3C System Configuration Legend ) New Treatment Plant atClose Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant Wastewater Pipeline 2.s s ,n : Mies Laguna Madre The key infrastructure requirements under the Option 3C over the next 30 years are presented here as Table 1-38. nate C x kail©' Tischl re Bose November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 46 Stantec LNV Table 1-38 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 3C Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Repair over next 15 years • Close after 15 -years and build new pumping station to direct flows to the new Southeast treatment plant. Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to the new Southeast treatment plant site. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years New Southeast Treatment Plant • Build new 32 MGD Southeast Treatment plant in the 0 to 5 year period. Oso • Repair plant over next 10 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 10 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Oso plant to transfer wastewater from Oso to the new Southeast treatment plant. Laguna Madre • Repair over next 20 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 0 to 20 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Laguna Madre plant to transfer wastewater from Laguna Madre to the new Southeast treatment plant. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years The new 32 MGD Southeast WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-39. Table 1-39 Proposed Unit Operations for new 32 MGD Southeast Treatment Plant Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 6 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 6 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 6 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 6 BNR bioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 6 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 6 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 6 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 6 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation 1.5.3.7 Option 4A - Consolidate at a new North Plant Site and Laguna Madre Option 4A involves the consolidation of existing plant flows at two treatment plant sites: a new north plant site and a new plant adjacent the Laguna Madre site. Allison, Oso, Laguna Madre and Greenwood would be taken out of service under this alternative and Broadway and Whitecap would stay in service for the foreseeable future although they could be consolidated at a later time. The system configuration under Option 4A is presented here as Figure 1-15. 47 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse LNV Stantec Figure 1-15 Option 4A System Configuration N Legend f New Treatment Plant Close Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant Esn Expand Treatment Plant Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline zs S tib Riles The key infrastructure requirements under the Option 4A over the next 30 years are presented here as Table 1-40. Table 1-40 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 4A Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Repair over next 15 years • Decommission the plant after 15 -years and build new pumping station to direct flows to the new North treatment plant. North Treatment Plant • Construct a new 12 MGD facility at the North treatment plant site in the next 5 years. • Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to the new North treatment plant site. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years Oso • Repair plant over next 5 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Oso plant to transfer wastewater from Oso to the new Laguna Madre facility. Laguna Madre • Repair the existing plant over the next 5 years • Build a new 20 MGD plant at the Laguna Madre site to take flows from Laguna Madre and Oso. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years nate C x kail©'' Tischl re Bose November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 48 Stantec LNV The new 12 MGD North WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-41. Table 1-41 Proposed Unit Operations for new North WWTP under Option 4A Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 2 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 2 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 3 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 3 BNRbioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 3 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 3 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 2 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 3 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation The new 20 MGD Laguna Madre WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-42. Table 1-42 Proposed Unit Operations for New Laguna Madre WWTP under Option 4A Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 4 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 4 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 4 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 4 BNRbioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 4 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 4 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 4 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 4 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation 1.5.3.8 Option 4B - Consolidate at a new Southwest Site and Laguna Madre Option 4B involves the consolidation of existing plant flows at two treatment plant sites: a new southwest plant site and a new plant adjacent the Laguna Madre site. Allison, Oso, Laguna Madre and Greenwood would be taken out of service under this alternative and Broadway and Whitecap would stay in service for the foreseeable future although they could be consolidated at a later time. The system configuration under Option 4B is presented here as Figure 1-16. 49 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rp Fri CR kailo'` TischlerBlse LNV Stantec Figure 1-16 Option 4B System Configuration N Legend f New Treatment Plant Close Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant Esn Expand Treatment Plant Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline zs S tib Riles The key infrastructure requirements under the Option 4B over the next 30 years are presented here as Table 1-43. Table 1-43 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 4B Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Repair over next 15 years • Decommission plant after 15 -years and build new pumping station to direct flows to the new Southwest treatment plant. Southwest Treatment Plant • Construct a new 12 MGD facility at the Southwest treatment plant site in the next 5 years. • Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to the new Southwest treatment plant site. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years Oso • Repair plant over next 5 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 0 to 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Oso plant to transfer wastewater from Oso to the new Laguna Madre facility. Laguna Madre • Repair the existing plant over the next 5 years • Build a new 20 MGD plant at the Laguna Madre site to take flows from Laguna Madre and Oso. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years nate C R r c kail©'' Tischl re Bose November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 50 Stantec LNV The new 12 MGD Southwest WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-44. Table 1-44 Proposed Unit Operations for Proposed Southwest Treatment Plant under Option 4B Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 2 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 2 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 3 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 3 BNRbioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 3 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 3 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 2 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 3 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation The new 20 MGD Laguna Madre WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-45. Table 1-45 Proposed Unit Operations for Laguna Madre WWTP under Option 4B Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 4 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 4 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 4 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 4 BNRbioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 4 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 4 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 4 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 4 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation 1.5.3.9 Option 4C - Consolidate at a new North Plant Site and a New Southeast Plant Site Option 4C involves the consolidation of existing plant flows at two treatment plant sites: a new southeast plant site and a new north plant site. Allison, Oso, Laguna Madre and Greenwood would be taken out of service under this alternative and Broadway and Whitecap would stay in service for the foreseeable future although they could be consolidated at a later time. The system configuration under Option 4C is presented here as Figure 1-17. 51 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse LNV Stantec Figure 1-17 Option 4C System Configuration N Legend New Treatment Plant Close Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant ► Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline z.s The key infrastructure requirements under the Option 4C over the next 30 years are presented here as Table 1-46. Table 1-46 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 4C Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Repair over next 15 years • Decommission the plant after 15 -years and build new pumping station to direct flows to the new North treatment plant. North Treatment Plant • Construct a new 12 MGD facility at the North treatment plant site in the next 5 years. • Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 0 to 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to the new North treatment plant site. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years Oso • Repair plant over next 5 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 0 to 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Oso plant to transfer wastewater from Oso to the new Southeast treatment plant facility. New Southeast Plant • Build a new 20 MGD plant at the Southeast site to take flows from Oso and ultimately Laguna Madre. nate C x hail©'' Tischl re Bose November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 52 Stantec LNV Plant Infrastructure Requirements Laguna Madre • Repair the existing plant over the next 20 years • Transfer flow to Southeast plant after 20 years. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years The new 12 MGD North WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-47. Table 1-47 Proposed Unit Operations for New 12 MGD North Plant under Option 4C Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 2 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 2 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 3 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 3 BNRbioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 3 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 3 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 2 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 3 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation The new 20 MGD Southeast WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-48. Table 1-48 Proposed Unit Operations for New 20 MGD Southeast Plant Under Option 4C Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 4 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 4 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 4 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 4 BNRbioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 4 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 4 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 4 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 4 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation 1.5.3.10 Option 4D - Consolidate at a new North Plant Site and the Existing Oso WRP Site Option 4D involves the consolidation of existing plant flows at two treatment plant sites: a new north plant site and an expanded and upgraded plant on the Oso WRP site. Allison, Oso, Laguna Madre and Greenwood would be taken out of service under this alternative and Broadway and Whitecap would stay in service for the foreseeable future although they could be consolidated at a later time. The system configuration under Option 4D is presented here as Figure 1-18. 53 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerNse LNV Stantec Figure 1-18 Option 4D System Configuration Legend (, New Treatment Plant StClose Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant EDI Expand Treatment Plant Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline 2.s MAN The key infrastructure requirements under the Option 4D over the next 30 years are presented here as Table 1-49. Table 1-49 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 4D Piurir Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Repair over next 10 years • Decommission the plant after 10 -years and build new pumping station to direct flows to the new North treatment plant. North Treatment Plant • Construct a new 12 MGD facility at the North treatment plant site in the next 5 years. • Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to the new North treatment plant site. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years Oso • Repair plant over next 20 years • Upgrade plant to BNR and expand to 20 MGD over next 5 years. Laguna Madre • Repair the existing plant over the next 5 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 0 to 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Laguna Madre plant to transfer wastewater from Laguna Madre to the Oso treatment plant. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years nate• C x hail©'' Tischl re Bose bi G —. November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 54 Stantec LNV The new 12 MGD North WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-50. Table 1-50 Proposed Unit Operations for 12 MGD New Plant under Option 4D Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 2 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 2 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 3 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 3 BNRbioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 3 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 3 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 2 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 3 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation 1.5.4 Capital and O&M Cost Analyses 1.5.4.1 Introduction One of the primary reasons for conducting this study was to confirm the potential benefits of consolidating flows from the six existing wastewater treatment facilities into a lesser number of newer larger treatment plants. The unit operating costs for larger wastewater treatment plants tend to be lower than for smaller facilities. This is primarily due to the facts staffing levels, measured as full- time equivalents (FTEs) per million gallon (MG) treated, and unit power costs measured as kilowatt hours (kW -hr) per million gallon treated decline with increasing plant capacity. The decline in unit power costs tends to level off at a design flow of approximately 20 MGD. As indicated in Section 1.1.2, the city is facing an estimated sustaining capital spend at the six existing wastewater treatment facilities of approximately $220 M. The majority of the capital requirements are for the Greenwood (approximately $61 M) and Oso (approximately $81 M) facilities. The contributing sewer shed for these two plants is coincidentally where the majority of anticipated demand growth is expected to occur. The currently planned capital improvement plan for which current rates are based (estimated capital spend to 2035 of approximately $524 M) is already considered unaffordable based upon EPA affordability criteria. User rate increases are driven in large part by increases in capital spend. The increase in capital spending can be partly offset by reductions in annual O&M spend. Options requiring a large upfront capital spend over the next 5 to 10 -years will have a significant further negative impact upon wastewater user rates if not offset by O&M cost efficiencies. The implementation of any of the options presented in the previous section needs to strike the appropriate balance between minimizing the sustaining capital spend on existing facilities destined to be taken out of service, consolidating existing facilities as soon as possible in order to realize annual O&M savings associated with economies of scale sooner rather than later, while staging planned capital spending for new facilities in order to minimize the impact upon user rates. The best way to assess the options under consideration was to construct a detailed cash flow model for each. The consulting team constructed detailed capital and O&M cost models for each of the options presented in Section 1.5.3. All of the options were compared against Option 1- Maintain existing six plants which was treated as the benchmark. The team then conducted sensitivity analyses on each of the options considered to determine how changing conditions might impact costs as well as the recommended servicing option. 1.5.4.2 Capital and O&M Cost Assumptions The capital and O&M cost estimates for each of the 10 options considered are presented in Appendix F. Three spreadsheet models were constructed for these analyses: a wastewater treatment plant staffing model, an estimate of power usage at each plant, and the overall cash flow model summarizing estimated capital and O&M costs. 55 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse The following assumptions were used in developing the cost models: • All of the optimization measures identified to reduce existing O&M costs in the Operations assessment were assumed to be applied to all options including Option 1- Maintain Six Existing Treatment Plants. • All works identified in the physical condition survey were carried out for all plants until such time as they were identified as being taken out of service. For example, a number of options assumed Greenwood will be taken out of service in year 5 therefore all works identified in the physical condition survey for Greenwood in the 0 to 5 -year period were included in the cash flow analysis. • Staffing level estimates were based upon the assessment methodology outlined in the "Northeast Guide for Estimating Staffing at Publicly and Privately Owned Wastewater Treatment Plants" dated November 2008 prepared by the New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission. • Preliminary power usage estimates for all treatment plant facilities were based upon guidance provided in the publication entitled "Electricity Use and Management in the Municipal Water Supply and Wastewater Industries" dated November 2013 and published by Water Research Foundation and Electrical Power Research Institute. • Non -process electrical loads will be approximately one third of those referenced in the above -noted guidance to account for the warmer climate in Texas. • Chemical costs under optimal conditions were taken as equal the average amount as indicated in the NACWA study. • Hauling costs were based upon an average solids generation of 0.59 dry tons/MG treated and a unit cost of $57.16/wet ton (2016) inflated at 2% per year. • The existing plants were assumed to maintain their current sludge dewatering performance with new plants assumed to achieve a minimum of 24% solids. • Preventative maintenance costs were estimated at 1.5 % per year of the replacement cost of the process mechanical and electrical equipment. Process mechanical and electrical equipment was assumed to account for 35% of the overall capital cost for all vertical works. • Approximately 20% of the aeration requirements required for nitrification will be recovered via denitrification when biological nutrient removal (BNR) is installed at any plant. • The current practice of disposing of sludge at a co - disposal landfill will continue into the foreseeable future. Rath C R G kaiok use LNV Stantec • Existing effluent limits at the Broadway and Whitecap plants will stay into effect for the foreseeable future and will not change over the 30 -year planning horizon. • All new and expanded plants will need to be converted to BNR. • All new plants will convert to anaerobic digestion with energy recovery. • The capital and O&M costs associated with industrial reuse will be paid for through a take or pay contract with interested industries and are not included in the cash flow and therefore the user rates. • Current electricity prices are $0.088/kW-hr and 2018 through 2022 prices will be $0.03883/kW-hr with 1% energy price inflation after 2021. • Average burdened labor cost is $68,448/year per FTE. Future wage inflation was assumed as 2% per year. • The cost of chemicals was $99/MG treated unless otherwise noted based upon actual plant operating records. Future chemical costs were assumed to increase by 1.5% per year. • Inflation on sludge haulage and preventative maintenance were both assumed as 2% per year. • Operating and maintenance costs other than labor, energy, chemicals, sludge hauling, and preventative maintenance were assumed to account for 25% to 30% of the overall total cost. 1.5.4.3 Capital and O&M Cost Analyses Capital and O&M cost estimates were completed for each of the 10 options previously presented. The cost models are enclosed in Appendix F and summarized here in Table 1-51. November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 56 Stantec LNV Table 1-51 Summary of Capital and O&M Costs by Option Option Description Capital Cost (2016-2045) (2016 Constant Dollars) Capital Cost Industrial Reuse (2016 Constant Dollars) Inflated O&M Costs (2016 to 2045) 1 Maintain six existing plants $734 M $108 M $521 M 2A Consolidate at Allison and Laguna Madre $950 M $50 M $502 M 2B Consolidate at Allison and Oso $836 M $50 M $467 M 3A Consolidate ata new North Plant $1,053 M $48 M $504 M 3B Consolidate at a new Southwest Plant $1,047 M $63 M $505 M 3C Consolidate at a new Southeast Plant $1,012 M TBD $516 M 4A Consolidate at a new North Plant and Laguna Madre $944 M $48 M $484 M 4B Consolidate at a new Southwest Plant and Laguna Madre $1,021 M $48 M $494 M 4C Consolidate at a new North Plant and a new Southeast Plant $958 M $63 M $493 M 4D Consolidate at a 0 o North Plant and $826 M $48 M $466 M 1.5.4.4 Sensitivity Analyses The project team conducted a sensitivity analysis of the various options considering the impact of changes in both energy and labor costs. The relative impact of various inflation rates on difference in O&M costs between the options is summarized here in Tables 2-52 and 2-53. Table 1-52 Difference in O&M Cost between Servicing Options for Various Labor Inflation Rates Option 1 Description O&M Costs O&M Costs (2% Labor Inflation) Diff. Relative to Optionl (4% Labor Inflation) Diff. Relative to Optionl Maintain six existing plants $521 M - $622 M - 2A Consolidate at Allison and Laguna Madre $502 M $19 M $575 M $47 M 2B Consolidate at Allison and Oso $467 M $54 M $529 M $93 M 3A Consolidate ata new North Plant $504 M $18 M $562 M $60 M 3B Consolidate ata new Southwest Plant $505 M $17 M $580 M $42 M 3C Consolidate ata new Southeast Plant $516 M $5 M $585 M $37 M 4A Consolidate ata new North Plant and Laguna Madre $484 M $37 M $548 M $73 M 4B Consolidate at a new Southwest Plant and Laguna Madre $494 M $27 M $570 M $53 M 4C Consolidate at a new North Plant and a new Southeast Plant $493 M $28 M $562 M $61 M 4D Consolidate at a new North Plant and Oso $466 M $55 M $529 M $93 M 57 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse LNV Stantec Table 1-53 Difference in O&M Costs between Options for Various Power Inflation Rates Option 1 Description O&M Costs O&M Costs (1% Electricity Inflation) Diff. Relative to Optionl (5% Electricity Inflation) Diff. Relative to Optionl Maintain six existing plants $521 M - $546 M - 2A Consolidate at Allison and Laguna Madre $502 M $19 M $528 M $18 M 2B Consolidate at Allison and Oso $467 M $54 M $492 M $54 M 3A Consolidate at a new North Plant $504 M $18 M $541 M $15 M 3B Consolidate ata new Southwest Plant $505 M $17 M $542 M $14 M 3C Consolidate at a new Southeast Plant $516 M $5 M $543 M $3 M 4A Consolidate ata new North Plant and Laguna Madre $484 M $37 M $509 M $36 M 4B Consolidate at a new Southwest Plant and Laguna Madre $494 M $27 M $520 M $26 M 4C Consolidate at a new North Plant and a new Southeast Plant $493 M $28 M $519 M $27 M 4D Consolidate at a new North Plant and Oso $466 M $55 M $491 M $55 M 1.5.4.5 Rate Impacts The consulting team estimated the impact of a number of the proposed servicing options on future wastewater rates using the city's existing rate model. The existing rate model calculates rates out to 2035. The estimated increase in user rates for options 1, 2B, 4D, and 3A are presented here in Table 1-54. In comparison, it is noted that the historical wastewater user rate increased by approximately 110% between 2005 and 2015. Option Table 1-54 Supplemental Wastewater User Rate Calculations Description Relative Increase in Wastewater User Rates (2016 to 2035) 1 2B 3A 4D Maintain six existing plants Consolidate at Allison and Oso Consolidate at a new North Plant Consolidate at a new North Plant and Oso 81% 85% 99% 84% 1.5.4.6 Cost Analysis Conclusions and Recommendations The financial analysis suggests Option 1- Maintain the six existing plants has the lowest overall capital cost associated with treatment and pumping infrastructure given that it takes maximum advantage of existing infrastructure. Option 1 however has the highest capital cost for industrial reuse water given reuse water would likely have to be provided from two treatment plants as opposed to one under other options. Option 1 also has the highest O&M costs ofthe options considered. The cost analyses suggest Options 2B and 4D are competitive with Option lfrom an overall cost perspective considering capital costs for treatment and reuse as well as cumulative O&M costs. The relative impact on user rates for options 1, 2B, and 4D is essentially equal. Option 3A would have a statistically significant impact on user rates relative to the Option 1 benchmark. Sensitivity analysis demonstrates that the difference in O&M cost savings is most sensitive to labor costs and labor cost inflation. The consolidation options each result in significant staff reduction relative to the bench mark Option 1 even after optimizing existing plant operations. Higher future labor costs and increased labor inflation will favor the consolidation options, particularly options 2B and 4D, relative to the benchmark (Option 1). The difference in 2045 staffing levels between the group 3 options (3A, 3B, and 3C) is only 4 or 5 staff relative to the group 2 and 4 options. The group 2 and 4 consolidation options are less affected by energy cost inflation and release O&M cost savings sooner than the group 3 options at much lower capital cost. Path C R kailo " TischlerSise G November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 58 Stantec `NV 1.5.5 Prescreening Criteria and Options Prescreening Prior to evaluating the Options, the City staff and their consultant teams engaged with the citizens and other stakeholders to hear what issues and concerns needed to be considered in selecting the optimum future wastewater configuration. As can be expected, there was a wide range of opinions expressed by the general public, neighborhood associations, agencies, business professionals and other interested parties. These issues of concerns were then grouped into preliminary evaluation criteria to cover the Economic, Social, Natural and Technical environments. The preliminary criteria were presented to City staff at an evaluation workshop where the team could confirm that these fully covered the range of relevant issues and also establish the relative priorities. Three priority levels and associated weightings were proposed: normal items were unweighted (level 1), important items were given a double weighting (level 2) and the most critical items were given a triple weighting (level 3). The final evaluation criteria and selected weightings are shown in Table 1-55. Table 1-55 Evaluation Criteria and Weighting Factors used for Options Evaluation Category Sub -Topic Considerations for Evaluation Weighting Total Capital Cost Overall 30 year capital cost 3 Cost Total O&M Cost Overall 30 year operating and maintenance costs Maximum peak annual capital and O&M costs 2 3 Cash Flow Maintaining base flow Providing minimum low flow conditions for streams 1 Receiving Streams Effluent requirements Ability to meet the expected future treatment requirements Support locally established eco systems 3 2 Local eco systems Phasing potential Opportunity for staging work to meet flow projections 2 Schedule Immediate start to work Early access to complete critical R&R needs at facilities 1 Neighboring land use Is the land use compatible with new/expanded facility 2 Land ownership Is new land acquisition required 1 Plant Sites Existing impacts Does this reduce existing odor, noise or traffic issues 1 Flooding potential Is the site vulnerable to flooding 2 Construction Restoration requirements Length of new pipeline under established road ways 1 Impacts Traffic disruption Duration of pipeline construction under major roadways Ease of providing reuse water for industry and other users 2 1 Potential for Reuse Operational Flexibility Servicing new Development Ease of providing servicing of future developments 1 Efficiency of O&M Efficiency provided by centralized operations and maintenance 2 Flexibility for future consolidation Ability to consolidate with remaining plants in future 2 Having established the evaluation criteria, each of the 10 Wastewater Servicing Options was evaluated using a qualitative five -point scale that ranged from strongly negative to strongly positive with a neutral midpoint level. It should be emphasized that the evaluation is subjective in nature and seeks to determine the relative performance or predicted impact under each criteria of an option as compared to the performance or impact of the other servicing options. To reinforce that the evaluation is qualitative in nature, symbols rather than numbers were used to represent the "score" under each criteria. The evaluation of options is presented here in Figure 1-19. Based on this evaluation, the highest ranked wastewater servicing options (in order of preference) are: • Option 4D - Consolidate at new North Plant & Oso • Option 2B - Consolidate at Allison and Oso • Option 1- Upgrade at the Existing Sites 59 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse LNV ® Stantec Figure 1-19 Options Evaluation Matrix LNV ® Stantec a) U Sub -Topic 1 !• __". " 2A 4_ f 2B 3A e 3B 3C __ 4A ,—. 4B __— 4C _ — 4D _ Total Capital Cost Strongly positive capital cost less than$800M Neutral - mid levelcapital cost of$900Mto $1,000M Positive -capital cost less than $900M Negative -capital costmorethan $1,000M Negative -capital costmorethan $1,000M Negative -capital costmorethan $1,000M Neutral -mid level capital cost $1,000M to $1,000M Neutral -mid levelcapital cost $1,000M $1,000M Neutral -mid level capital cost C $1,000M 00Mto Positive -capital 46 costlessthan $900M l_Jmorethan$550M Total O&M Cost Negative -high level O&M cost Neutral- mid o levelO&M cost of $525M to $550M Strongly positive- • low O&M cost less than$500M Neutral- mid 4) levelO&M cost of $525M to $550M Neutral -mid 1) level O&M cost of $525M to $550M Neutral- mid 4) levelO&M cost of $525M to $550M Positive -lower 4) O&M cost of $500M to $525M Neutral- mid 4) levelO&M cost of $525M to $550M Neutral -mid 4) level O&M cost of $525M to $550M Strongly positive - • low O&M cost less than$500M Cash Flow Strongly positive- • max annual spend of approx $100M Neutral -max O annual spend of approx$200M Neutral -max O annual spend of approx$200M Negative -max O annual spend of approx$250M Negative -max O annual spend of approx$250M Negative -max O annual spend of approx$250M Negative -max O annual spend of approx$250M Strongly negative 0-maxannual $300M rox Strongly negative 0-maxannuat $300M rox Neutral -max O annual spend of approx$200M Maintaining base flow Neutral -keeps O all at status quo Negative -reduce O flows to Oso Bay Neutral -keeps O criticalflows at status quo Negative -reduce O flows to Oso Bay Strongly negative -reduce flow to O Oso Bay, increase to Oso Creek Negative -reduce O flows to Oso Bay Negative -reduce O flows to Oso Bay Strongly negative reduce flows to O Oso Bay, increase to Oso Creek Negative -reduce O flows to Oso Bay Neutral -keeps O criticalflows at status quo Effluent requirements Negative- continues challenges in Oso Bay and Nueces River Neutral- continues challenges in NuecesRiver Negative- continues t) challenges in Oso Bay and Nueces giver Positive -allows G lower treatment requirements Neutral- continues challenges in Oso Creek Neutral- continues 41) challenges in Oso Creek Positive -allows lower treatment requirements Neutral- continues challenges in Oso Creek Positive -allows lower treatment requirements Neutral -lower treatment in north, challenges inOso Bay Localeco systems O Neutral -keeps status quo Negative- O potentialimpact at Blind Oso from loss of flow O Neutral -keeps status quo Negative- O potentialimpact at Blind Oso from loss of flow Negative- O potentialimpact at Blind Osofrom loss of flow Negative- O potentialimpact at Blind Oso from loss of flow Negative- O potentialimpact at Blind Osofrom loss of flow Negative- O potentialimpact at Blind Oso from loss of flow Negative- O potentialimpact at Blind Osofrom loss of flow O Neutral -keeps status quo Phasing potential li Positive -can Ann proceed with multiple projects at onetime Neutral- can proceed at two sites and with pipelines Neutral- can � proceed at two sites and with pipelines Negative - requires all projects robe ©tl' ompleted at same time Negative - requires all projects to be completed at sametime Negative - requires all projects robe completed at sametime Neutral- can � proceed at two sites and with pipelines Neutral- can proceed at two sites and with pipelines Neutral- can � proceed at two sites and with pipelines Neutral- can proceed at two sites and with pipelines Immediate start to work Neutral- iv challenges at Oso, remainder available Positive - can work adjacent toboth existing plants Neutral- iv challenges at Oso, remainder available Negative AV -requires acquisition of land Negative AV -requires acquisition of land Positive - can work independently on new plant Negative AV -requires acquisition of land Negative AV -requires acquisition of land Negative AV -requires acquisition of land Negative -requires acquisition of land and working at Oso u c kaio ^ Tschler lis, Legend 0 0 c • Strongly Negative Positive strongly Negative Neutral November 2016 Opt., Wostewater ireolmentConfigurotion 60 ® Stantec Stantec `NV/ o)"- U Sub -Topic 1 ,p- z-_—_, Neutral- continues O residential conflicts at Oso and Greenwood 2A Positive - uses dp sites with good buffers 2B _ Neutral- ontiContinues O rcesidentialnues conflicts at Oso 31, \'~ Strongly positive • -new plant in industrial area 3B = ` — ___ Negative -new O plant ingenerally residential area 3C \I,. _ Negative -new O plant in generally residential area dA ` __ Positive -uses sites withgood buffers 4B __ Negative -new O plant in generally residential area 4C __ ? __ Neutral- Continues O residential conflicts at Oso and Greenwood 4D ..- Neutral - O r esidential conflicts at Oso Neighboring land use Land ownership Positive -no new ip land required for 20 years Strongly positive no new land • required for >30 years Strongly positive no new land • required for >30 years Negative -land O required for new plant Strongly negative -new O land required in residential area Strongly positive no new land • required for >30 years Negative - land O required for new plant Negative -land O required for new plant Negative - land O required for new plant Negative -land O required for new plant wPositive Existingtsat impacts Neutral- continues status quo -removes impac Greenwood and Oso Neutral- Continues impacts at Oso Positive - removes impac Greenwtsoodat and Oso Neutral- ontinuesim is pac atOso Creek Neutral- continues impacts atOso Creek Positive removes impacts at Oso Creek Neutral- continues im is impacts atOso Creek Neutral- ontinuesim is pac atOso Creek Neutral- continues impacts atOso Creek Flooding potential Negative - O requires new flood wall at Greenwood Positive - removes impact from flooding at Oso Creek Positive - removes impact from flooding at Oso Creek Positive - removes impact from flooding at Oso Creek Neutral -requires O additionalflood protection along Oso Creek Neutral -requires O additionalflood protection along Oso Creek Positive - removes impact from flooding at Oso Creek Neutral -requires O additionalflood protection along Oso Creek Neutral -requires O additionalflood protection along Oso Creek Positive - removes impact from W flooding at Oso Creek Restoration requirements Strongly positiveStrongly • Sminima, new pipelines required O Negative -new pipelines required O Negative -new pipelines required negative O -requires extensive pipeline construction Strongly negative O -requires extensive pipeline construction Strongly negative O -requires extensive pipeline construction O Negative -new pipelines required O Negative -new pipelines required O Negative -new pipelines required O Negative -new pipelines required Traffic c disruption o° Strongly positive •- minimal new pipelines required Neutral- new pipelines in generally open areas Neutral- new pipelines in generally open areas Negative- © pipelines cross built up areas Negative- © pipelines cross built up areas Negative- © pipelines cross built up areas Neutral- new pipehnesin generally open areas Neutral- new pipehnesin generally open areas Negative- © pipelines cross built up areas Neutral- new pipehnesin generally open areas Potentialfor Reuse Negative- Air. Long distanceLong to servicing industry Positive -Allison to plantcloseto industry Positive -Allison ip plant close to industry Strongly positive- • North plant close to industry Negative- distance to servicing industry Strongly negative -Longest distance to servicing industry Positive - North go plantcloseto industry Negative - Long distance to servicing industry Positive - North go plant close to industry Positive - North to plantcloseto industry Servicing t- new Development w Negative - needs new plant to o svice w growth ne Neutral -requires expansion of o pumping and plant Neutral -requires expansion of 0 pumping and plant Neutral -requires expansion of 0 pumping and plant Strongly positive • -closetonew growth Strongly positive • -closetonew growth Positive -can readily provide capacity for new growth Strongly positive • -closetonew growth Strongly positive • -closetonew growth Positive -can readily provide capacity for new growth 10, .� Efficiency of d O&M Strongly negative rTh _ continuesconsolidate operations at 6 sites Neutral- to twoconsolidate main plants, one m new Neutral- to two m main plants, one new Strongly positive- • consolidate to one main new plant Strongly positive- • consolidate to one main new plant Strongly positive - • consolidate to one main plant Positive - consolidate to two main plants, both new Positive - consolidate to two ain plants, both new Positive - consolidate to two main plants, both new Neutral - consolidate to two main plants, one new Flexibility for Fle,nburedoenelili consolidation Negative O faci-listatefuturenot consolidation Neutral- can O Whitecaponsolidate but not Broadway Neutral- can O Whitecaponsolidate but not Broadway Neutral- can O chroadwaybosolidate utnet Whitecap Negative O faci-dolistatefuturenot consolidation Neutral- can O Whitecapnsolidate but not Broadway Positive - can 40 Whdtecapandonsolidateboth Broadway Neutral- can nso O Whitecdateap but not Broadway Positive - can 40 Whdtecapandonsolidateboth Broadway Positive -can nso co Whitecdateapandboth Broadway Overall Rating 102 101 104 95 78 86 100 84 92 106 Novernber 2016 98th v s kaio Trac T ANY ® Stantec 1.5.6 Recommended Wastewater Servicing Option The highest ranked wastewater servicing option (identified as 4D) is to consolidate future wastewater treatment around two main facilities - a new North plant and the Oso plant. This is the recommended option. The components of this recommended Option 4D are shown on Figure 1-20 and summarized in Table 1-57. Figure 1-20 System Configuration of Recommended Option - Option 4D (,.) New Treatment Plant Close Treatment Plant j ,,,,, * Repair Treatment Plant A 10 Expand Treatment Plant —›Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline , „: , .., , , / ////4 2.5 nate C R kr G kaiokTisch &use November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 62 to), Stantec LNV Table 1-56 Key Infrastructure Requirements for recommended Option 4D Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Repair over next 10 years • Decommission the plant after 10 -years and build new pumping station to direct flows to the new North treatment plant. North Treatment Plant • Construct a new 12 MGD facility at the North treatment plant site in the next 5 years. • Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to the new North treatment plant site. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years Oso • Repair plant over next 20 years • Upgrade plant to BNR and expand to 20 MGD over next 5 years. Laguna Madre • Repair the existing plant over the next 5 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Laguna Madre plant to transfer wastewater from Laguna Madre to the Oso treatment plant. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years 63 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse 000 Stantec LNV 2.0 Implementation Phasing Plan 2.1. Introduction Implementation of the wastewater management servicing plan is recommended to be undertaken over a series of phases in order to balance the use and availability of critical resources over a number of years. These critical resources including access to capital to fund the work; access to engineering and program management expertise; ability of City staffto administer the plan while other capital programs are ongoing; access to adequate contractors and trades; availability of key construction material inputs; and ability of operational staffto maintain the system while being trained on new or upgraded facilities. An outline of the preliminary proposed phasing is provided in the following sections. 2.1.1 First Phase North The new North treatment plant would be constructed in the northwest quadrant of the City in an area located between the CC International airport and the I-37 Highway. A specific property for this new plant has not been identified and it is recommended that the City investigate available parcels of approximately 80 acres or more in area, which would support an ultimate future site capacity of 60 MGD. The construction of this North plant would be staged to coincide with decommissioning of other facilities and increased flow from planned growth. The first phase of the North plant is expected to be a 12 MGD facility that would allow for decommissioning of the Allison and Greenwood plants. The new North plant would be provided with state of the art equipment allowing for an advanced level of treatment including screening and grit removal, primary clarification, fine bubble aeration, tertiary filtration, UV disinfection, anaerobic sludge digestion and thickening. A conceptual site plan for this new North plant is provided in Figure 2-1. Figure 2-1 Conceptual Site Plan for New North Treatment Plant NI 11, P.: ' 1;.- ' 0- 1 , 40 0 .- . , , :sy : , * - - 7"---- - Greenwood For the Greenwood service area, there is the potential for considerable future flow to occur depending on the City's policies with respect to planned new development. It is therefore proposed that the Greenwood pump station be located on the site of the Greenwood wastewater plant and planned in a flexible manner to allow construction in phases to match future flows. The first phase has been conceptually sized as a 30 MGD pump station with 42" diameter force main which is adequate for conveying the existing peak flows from the Greenwood facility to the North plant. The site layout plan will allow for an ultimate 90 MGD pump station and additional twinned force main which will be needed prior to future servicing of new developments south of Oso Creek. After the first phase of the pump station is commissioned, the remainder of the existing Greenwood plant will be decommissioned and the site can be made available for other uses. A conceptual layout of Greenwood and decommissioning of the existing treatment plant is provided in Figure 2-2. 64 Implementation Phasing Plan November 2016 Rc kailo'` TlschlerBlse Figure 2-2 Greenwood Pumping Station Site Plan Oso The expansion and upgrade of the Oso facility is proposed to include a full overhaul of all unit processes to bring these up to state of the art technology, providing for advanced levels of treatment with nutrient removal capability. The final treatment configuration will be determined after verification of the permitted effluent standards by TCEQ. In addition to upgrading with new technologies, the plant will be expanded to a 20 MGD average annual flow capacity initially and ultimately 24 MGD within the existing fence line. A conceptual site plan for the expanded Oso plant is shown on Figure 2-3. Figure 2-3 Preliminary Layout for Upgraded and Expanded Oso WRP Path C R kalio "` TischlerBise G LNV ® Stantec Laguna Madre After the Oso plant is upgraded and expanded, a pump station and force main will be constructed for conveyance of the wastewater from the Laguna Madre service area to Oso. It is proposed that the pump station be located on the existing site of the Laguna Madre wastewater plant and is expected to require a 10 MGD pump station with a 20" diameter force main to convey the peak wastewater flow to the Oso Plant. This initial conceptual sizing for this Laguna Madre PS and force main assume that it would be sized for the future anticipated peak flow from this service area. It is noted that the preferred route for the force main is through the NAS lands which are currently serviced with an independently owned and operated wastewater facility. The City and NAS are currently in discussion over potential opportunities to rationalize their separate wastewater operations, and this will be reviewed further prior to finalizing the size and route for the Laguna Madre force main. After the pump station is commissioned, the existing Laguna Madre plant will be decommissioned and the remaining site area can be made available for other uses. Collection System During the initial phase of the wastewater servicing plan, a range of collection system improvements will be undertaken as outlined in the Consent Decree currently under negotiation between the City and EPA. Many of these improvements will be located in the Broadway, Oso and Greenwood service areas and address existing deficiencies with service laterals, sewers and force mains via local pipeline rehabilitation, repair or replacement. Following these improvements, it is expected that the City will see a reduction in the extraneous flows due to inflow/Infiltration (I/I) and an associated reduction in the peak flows arriving at these facilities. The New Broadway facility has been constructed to meet an 8 MGD average annual capacity and a 20 MGD peak capacity. The design allowed for future capital improvements to increase the peak flow capacity to 40 MGD, but this work is currently on hold and will be deferred pending a review of the actual observed peak flows observed following the collection system improvements. Additional collection system modifications are under consideration that can rationalize the service area boundaries and provide best use of existing available treatment capacity. These potential projects include flow diversion from one or more of the Port/Pearse, McBride and Arcadia Lift Stations to the Broadway plant to reduce pressure on the Greenwood plant and better use the new Broadway Treatment facilities. The total potential for diversion from the Greenwood to the Broadway sewer sheds is estimated as 2 MGD on an annual average flow basis. Preliminary conceptual routing and associated infrastructure requirements for two of these potential flow diversions are presented here on Figures 2-4 and 2-5. November 2016 Implementation Phasing Plan 65 Stantec LNV Figure 2-4 Potential Force Main Routing for Flow Diversion from McBride Lift Station to Broadway WWTP Figure 2-5 Potential Force Main Routing for Flow Diversion from Arcadia Lift Station to Broadway WWTP Similarly, the existing Woodridge and Williams lift stations both currently pump to the Oso plant. These can readily be modified and provided with flexibility to pump flow over to the Greenwood plant site to relieve flow in the Oso service area. These and other collection system boundary adjustments will be implemented progressively as needed to balance flows during the time while the North plant is under construction. 2.1.2 Second Phase The second major phase of the management servicing plan is proposed to include the consolidation and decommissioning of the Allison WWTP. For purposes of this report, it has been assumed that the preferred strategy is for this work to be undertaken following construction and commissioning of the North plant. Allison Following construction of the North plant, pump stations and force mains will be constructed to allow conveyance of the wastewater from the Allison service area to the new facility. It is proposed that the Allison pump station be located on the existing site of the Allison wastewater plant and is expected to require a 15 MGD pump station with a 30" diameter force main to convey the peak wastewater flow from Allison to the North Plant. This initial conceptual sizing for this Allison PS and force main assume that it would be sized for the future anticipated peak flow from this service area. Further analysis can be undertaken prior to detailed design to determine if either additional future force mains, abooster pump stations or similar alternative strategy may be desirable. After the pump station is commissioned, the existing Allison plant will be decommissioned and the site can be made available for other uses. 2.1.3 Future Phases One major advantage of the preferred wastewater servicing plan is that it provides the City with considerable flexibility to adjust to future servicing requirements or regulatory conditions. Some of the scenarios are discussed below. Note that these potential capital projects have not been considered in the cash flow projections, since the timing and nature of these alternatives is uncertain. Greenwood As noted above, the Greenwood Pump Station will be planned to allow future expansion up to an expected ultimate 90 MGD peak capacity. This additional future flow could come from a variety of areas including new planned development south of Oso Creek or diversion of additional excess flow from new development in the existing Oso service area. Expansion of the Greenwood PS and construction of new force main capacity will be phased in as needed by these growth scenarios. Capital cost for these projects would need to be assessed against the new benefitting developments. Broadway The Broadway plant is about 5 years old and typically mechanical and electrical equipment is expected to last in the range of 20 to 30 years. That means that a major upgrade or rebuild maybe needed in approximately 20 years. Rather than invest in a significant capital upgrade, the City may at that time prefer to transfer the flow over to the North Plant and expand that facility. This would have operational advantages and could provide a longer time savings through additional consolidation. Whitecap The Whitecap facility is located on a barrier island and is remote from the other larger mainland facilities. Consolidation of this service area as part of the wastewater servicing plan is not considered cost effective and the plant is appropriately sized for the projected future flow. It is therefore recommended that it be maintained in its current location with occasional upgrading or repair as required. However, it is recognized that this location is vulnerable to catastrophic damage should a major hurricane strike the area. If such a disaster caused significant damage to the Whitecap facility, the City may prefer to construct a pump station and force main to connect to the mainland wastewater system rather than invest in a replacement 66 Implementation Phasing Plan November 2016 nein C R G kaio* Tiscs h lase plant. A conceptual route for this potential force main crossing of Laguna Madre would follow the route of New Humble Channel up to Bluffs Landings on Flour Bluff. Based on analysis done previously by the City for a water main crossing, this route provides an advantage since it is along disturbed boating channels and would minimize impacts on sea grasses Reuse The preferred option identifies potential for producing reuse quality water for sale to industry along the Ship Channel. There are currently a variety of competing projects under consideration for additional process and cooling water to industry, including a pilot desalination facility. It is therefore proposed that the design of the North plant allow for future addition of the necessary polishing treatment processes for industrial reuse water production but that these elements are not included until and unless the City has assurance that there is a means for cost recovery through sale of water to industry. 2.2. Project Risk Assessment 2.2.1 Introduction to Risk Assessment Many communities are using risk assessment to identify and quantify the severity of risk associated with capital projects. Each project has a different risk profile. Typical risk categories for infrastructure service delivery projects in general and in joint public-private projects are: • Site risk - a collection of risks that flow through the project land. An example of site risk is land acquisition, geotechnical, archaeological, existing condition, etc. • Design, construction and commissioning risk - all risks leading to liabilities and costs related to the design, construction and commissioning of the project on budget and on schedule. • Sponsor and financial risk - risks related to the sponsor's financial stability and security to protect the project on behalf of the public sector. • Operating risk - the consequence of operating risk related to the cost of operating the facility exceeding projections and/or the performance of the facility not meeting projections. • Market risk - risks related to the demand or price of the service resulting in not meeting the revenue projections etc. • Network and interface risk - risks related to the point of intersection between privately provided services and government controlled networks or services and where there is an interdependency of performance. • Industrial relations risk - risks related to labor disputes or action during construction and operational phases of the projects. nate C R kailo 3ischl re Bose LNV ® Stantec • Legislative and government risk - risks related to changes in legislation, government policy and the election of a new government that could impact the project. • Force majeure risk - risks outside the control of either party that impedes the provision of services during the contract period. • Asset ownership risk - risks related to the technical life of the project, or damage or destruction or premature obsolescence are some examples of this risk category. Quantification of risks can assist decision makers in the selection of options and identification and mitigation of project specific issues. For the wastewater management plan the use of risk assessment provides a good technique to highlight the risks that are known at this time. As the project develops and more information becomes available the risk assessment can be updated. Proposed mitigation strategies are presented in Section 4.4 of this report. 2.2.2 Risk Matrix A preliminary risk matrix (Table 2-1) has been prepared for Option 4D. Avariety of risk factors have been considered. These include siting risks, construction cost risk, constructability and a number of others. Each of these risks is ranked using a simple probability of occurrence using a 1 to 3 ranking. The risk impact is also ranked 1 to 3 with 1 being low impact and 3 being high impact. The factor of the probability and impact provides an overall risk factor. This technique is useful in providing a high level screening of risk factors. As the project develops more detailed risk assessment and workshops can be completed with various stakeholders and city staff. November 2016 Implementation Phasing Plan 67 Stantec LNV 2.2.3 Risk Ranking The project was ranked in consideration of the risk categories applicable to each of the major project components. The risks associated with each site under consideration for construction of facilities have been assessed. It also considers the risk associated with the various conveyance systems, social risks and construction risks. Table 2-1 Preliminary Risk Matrix RISK IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT Category Risk PROB. IMPACT RISK HIGH= 3 HIGH= 3 FACTOR HIGH > 5 MED = 2 MED = 2 MED 4-5 LOW =1 LOW= 1 LOW < 4 Risk Option 4D Greenwood WWTP site 3 2 6 • Flooding may occur before new North plant is constructed. • Nuisance impacts on neighbors before new plant is constructed. 2 2 4 Site • New North plant construction delayed increasing sustaining capital spend at Greenwood. 2 2 4 • Local stakeholders and/or regulator objects to ceasing discharge into Oso Creek. 1 3 3 • Unable to get easements for the proposed force mains 1 1 3 3 3 3 New North Plant • City unable to find a suitable site in the proposed area. • Significant public opposition to a new North plant 2 3 6 Site • Plant construction delayed. 2 3 6 • Discharge permit to ship channel is delayed or denied. 1 3 3 • Impact of new plant on adjacent residents 1 2 2 3 2 6 Oso WRP • TCEQ denies new effluent permit for plant Site • Adjacent residents oppose the expansion of the plant 3 2 6 • Plant constructability negatively impacted by existing configuration 3 3 9 • Expansion cost higher than estimated 2 3 6 Allison WWTP • Environmentalists oppose the cessation of the current effluent discharge. 2 2 4 Site • Neighborhood impacts associated with proposed pipeline construction to new North plant. 2 3 6 Site • Increased sustaining capital spend due to delay in transferring flow to North plant. 2 2 4 Laguna Madre • Neighborhood impacts associated with proposed pipeline construction to Oso WRP 2 2 4 • Increased sustaining capital spend due to delay in transferring flow to Oso. 2 2 4 68 Implementation Phasing Plan November 2016 Rc kailo'` TlschlerBlse LNV Stantec Category RISK IDENTIFICATION Risk RISI< PROB. HIGH = 3 MED=2 LOW =1 2 ASSESSMENT IMPACT HIGH= 3 MED=2 LOW= 1 2 RISK FACTOR HIGH > 5 MED4 5 LOW < 4 4 • General Public Acceptance of plan • Mitigation Strategies/ Costs higher than anticipated 2 2 4 Stakeholders • Loss of reuse water at locations that currently receive it. 2 1 2 • Social Concerns (concern with rate increases even though plan is one of least expensive) 2 2 4 • Treatment Technology Selection 2 1 2 Engineering • Resource Recovery 2 2 4 • Foundation/ Site Conditions 2 1 2 • Capital Cost/ Affordability 2 3 6 • Anticipated Operations/ Maintenance Costs savings not realized 2 3 6 • Lack of Available Funding 2 3 6 Financial • Funding Conditions/ Restrictions 2 2 4 • Cost Escalation 2 2 4 • Contingency Items 2 2 4 • Financing Costs 1 1 1 Procurement • Procurement Strategy 2 1 2 • Cost higher than anticipated 2 3 6 Construction • Market Conditions not conducive to competitive bidding 1 3 3 • Schedule/ Delays delaying O&M savings. 2 3 6 • Changes/ Claims 2 2 4 • Natural Disaster (hurricane) 1 3 3 Other • City doesn't have sufficient staff to administer the wastewater capital program according to the schedule 2 3 6 • Treatment System Failure (existing plants) 3 2 6 • Archaeological Conditions 1 2 2 2.3. Proposed Implementation Plan and Project Delivery 2.3.1 Project Delivery Options The use of terms and processes related to project delivery models are in the end all related to the degree of risk transfer or level of risks assumed by the private sector versus those retained by the public sector. Project risk is defined as the probability of an unfavorable event having a negative impact upon a project investment. Risk can be managed and/or mitigated. The selection of the appropriate project delivery method is based upon mitigation or delegation of project specific risks to those best able to manage them. A summary of available alternative delivery methods is summarized in the text that follows. Design/Bid/Build (DBB) is the traditional method of project delivery being used successfully for most water and wastewater capital projects in the United States. This method involves three basic participants: design professional (DP), general contractor and City (operating agency). Typically, a sequential approach is utilized for the design, construction and operation. In an attempt to integrate expertise of the participants, techniques including constructability reviews, operability reviews and value engineering are incorporated into the design bid build process. After construction, facilities are operated by City staff. Rath C R G kaiak use November 2016 Implementation Phasing Plan 69 Stantec LNV The first step of this method is to retain a design professional through a qualifications based selection (QBS) process. The design professional's responsibilities include determining facility requirements for the City, and defining (implicitly) many of the risk elements of the project. The design professional is responsible for the engineering design of the facility and the development of contract documents for competitive bidding by the City. In the second step, bids are tendered in conformance with the contract documents and the lowest responsive, responsible bidder is selected, without negotiations, to construct the facilities. Either the design professional, an independent engineer, or City staff assures that the builder's performance is in compliance with the contract documents and assists in resolving any issues or conflicts or both. The City retains design liability. Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) has two major participants in the contract with the City. The design professional is contracted by the City through a qualifications based selection (QBS) process and is responsible for the design. The construction manager is contracted by the City and is placed at risk early in the project for delivering the work within a guaranteed maximum price. The construction manager provides coordination services in lieu of a general contractor and provides design phase input and assistance. At some point in the design process, the construction manager and the City establish a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) to which the construction manager is contractually bound. The design professional provides conceptual and detailed requirements for the project use in developing a GMP. The City is involved during the design phase by bringing operations expertise into the project; however, once the GMP is established, changes in the project scope may impact the GMP. The construction manager provides design phase consultation in evaluating costs, schedule, implications of alternative designs and systems, and materials; and assumes the risk of construction after the GMP is established. The construction manager self performs portions of the construction and selects qualified construction subcontractors for the remaining portions to complete the work. The contract between the City and CM is typically structured to include an "off ramp" at the GMP stage. This allows the City to terminate the contract with the CM, direct the design professional to complete the design, and bid the project as a DBB if the GMP is considered too high. The selection of the CMAR by the City is based on their qualifications and generally occurs shortly after the selection of the design professional. The construction subcontractors are usually not selected until after the design phase is complete and are not involved in the design phase of the project. This method is best suited for large, new or rehab projects that are schedule driven, are difficult to define, or require construction input during the design phase. This method is least suited for small projects, or where projects are very well defined. Design/Build with City Operations involves a single entity contracted to provide both design and construction services. The City usually develops performance requirements for use in securing a design -builder. The design -builder contracts directly with subcontractors and is responsible for delivery and performance of the project, and specifically assumes design as well as construction liability. Selection of the design -builder is based on the proposal offering the best value to the City, in terms of qualifications, technical and business merit, and project costs. Independent technical, legal and/or financial consultant(s) may serve as City's agent(s) in managing the procurement process, establishing performance criteria and monitoring performance. A conceptual to preliminary design (10 to 30 percent) maybe prepared at the direction of the City to detail the prescriptive and performance requirements of the project. The design/build contract is negotiated based on a formal Proposal. The City can also execute the project under what is referred to as a progressive design build (PDB). The City has more input to the design under a progressive design build and can make changes as design progresses. Although the DB team provides an indicative price upon proposal submission the Contractor is not bound to this price. However, like CMAR the DB team will produce a GMP at a defined point in the design process (typically 60 to 70% design) which the team will be responsible for meeting. There is typically an opportunity for an "off ramp" at the GMP stage if the submitted price is not acceptable to the City. This delivery method requires the City to be knowledgeable of its needs and objectives for the project and be directly involved in the process. A key element to success is trust between the City and the design -builder, and the opportunity and necessity for the design professional and contractor to work closely together to develop the winning Proposal. For this method, the design -builder is provided with a description of the desired end -product or project outcome. The design -builder is responsible for developing the detailed design and specifications, selection of material and equipment, constructing the facility and meeting performance requirements. Proposers, oftentimes a team of design professional(s) and contractor(s), respond to a Request for Qualifications (RFQ). A short-listed group of qualified proposers responds to a Request for Proposals (RFP) by submitting technical, price and business proposals. The competition process, established early on in the procurement process by the City, ensures an award; which is primarily based on price, technical and financial qualifications. 70 Implementation Phasing Plan November 2016 R�rh ckaiak Tllscs h lase Design/Build/Operate (DBO) is similar to the design/ build method except that the long-term operation and maintenance (typically 20 years) of the facility is combined with the design and construction into a single service contract. A variation to the longterm operations and maintenance contract is to have a period of performance of less than 5 or 10 years, although the trend in today's market is for 20 -year contract operation periods. As with D/B, independent technical, legal and/or financial consultant(s) may serve as City's agent(s) in managing the procurement process, establishing performance criteria and monitoring performance. In the DBO method, the City has the ability to transfer a significant amount of responsibility and risk associated with a project to a single point of responsibility. That single party is responsible for the integration of design, construction, operation and maintenance expertise for the development of the facility in accordance with performance criteria established by the City. The primary purpose for combining the design, construction, operation and maintenance into a single contract is to effectively integrate all three areas of expertise and responsibility during all phases of the project. The single party, who will guarantee the performance of the full service contract, has the incentive to balance cost efficiencies and long-term operation and maintenance costs and establish an optimum lifecycle analysis. At the end of the contract cycle when the facilities are converted to City operations, contract requirements will need to state and prove that the facilities are fully functional, systems can continue to achieve permit compliance and condition of the equipment is appropriately maintained during the life of the contract. Proposers, generally a team of a design professional(s), contractor(s) and an operation and maintenance organization, respond to a Request for Qualifications (RFQ). A short listed group of qualified proposers then respond to a Request for Proposals (RFP) by submitting technical, commercial and legal proposals. The negotiation process, established early on in the procurement process by the City, ensures an award, which is primarily based on price, technical and financial qualifications. Contract negotiations are permitted, and it is not required that the lowest price proposer be selected if another proposer offers the best value overall. During the contract period, the City retains the ownership of the asset and responsibility for rate setting, billing, collection and administrative services. The Design/Build/Maintain (DBM) method is similar to DB, except that the longer term maintenance of the facility is combined with the design and construction into a single contract with the City operations. An independent consultant(s) may serve as the City's agent by assisting in establishing performance and maintenance requirements Rath C R G kaiak use LNV ® Stantec along with process performance and monitoring performance. The primary purpose for including an extended maintenance period (5 to 20 years) is to assure that the quality of equipment provided and the quality of installation are paramount. It moves the project delivery method closer to design/build/operate, except it allows for continued operation by the City. In the DBM method, the City has the ability to transfer significant responsibilities and risks associated with a constructed project to a single point of responsibility. The single party is responsible for the integration of design, construction and maintenance of the facility for a significant period of time in accordance with performance criteria established by the City. The City relinquishes significant project control to the DBM for design, construction and maintenance aspects of the facility. Since selection of the design -builder is not generally based solely on price, the City has the opportunity to consider qualifications and experience in the selection process. Since the City will own and operate the facilities, it must carefully evaluate standards of proposed predictive, preventive and corrective maintenance, as well as repair and replacement to ensure that the facilities operate efficiently and that the condition of equipment is appropriately maintained during the life of the contract. Standards need to be established so that at the end of the contract period, equipment is left in satisfactory condition. Proposers, generally a team of a design professional(s), contractor(s) and maintenance organization, respond to a Request for Qualifications (RFQ). A short listed group of qualified proposers then respond to a Request for Proposals (RFP) by submitting technical, commercial (business) and financial proposals. The negotiation process, established early on in the procurement process by the City, ensures an award, which is primarily based on price, technical and financial qualifications. The Design/Build/Finance/Operate (DBFO) method is similar to the DBO Method described previously except that the facility is financed by the DBFO entity during the design, construction and long-term operations period of the facility. DBFO is also sometimes referred to as P3 (Public -Private -Partnership). As with the DB method, independent technical, legal and/or financial consultant(s) may serve as the City's agent(s) in managing the procurement process, establishing performance criteria and monitoring performance. Service fee includes an allowance for construction debt service (as well as its operating and maintenance costs), and as a result the City will have no direct bond or debt service liability. If the contractor fails to provide service, the City can withhold the periodic service payments from the contractor, which includes the repayment of capital and interest. In extreme circumstances of default, the City can terminate the service contract. November 2016 Implementation Phasing Plan 71 Stantec LNV During the contract, the City retains ownership of the asset and also the responsibility for rate setting, billing, collection and administrative services. The Design/Build/Finance/Own/Operate (DBFOO) method is similar to the DBFO Method described above except that the facility is owned by the DBFOO entity during the long-term operations period of the facility. With this delivery method, the project is financed by the DBFOO entity. Again as with the DB method, independent technical, legal and/or financial consultant(s) may serve as the City's agent(s) in managing the procurement process, establishing performance criteria and monitoring performance. The DBFOO contractor, as the tax beneficial owner, will depreciate the project and contribute equity, which will reduce the amount of debt needed to finance the project. As a tradeoff, the contractor will own the project when the service contract expires, and the City must then purchase or rent the facilities at fair market value if it wishes to continue to receive service from the plant. The service fee includes an allowance for the contractor's debt service (as well as its operating and maintenance costs), and the City will have no direct bond or debt service liability. If the contractor fails to provide service, the contractor does not receive payment. If a resolution cannot be reached between the involved entities, termination of the service contract may occur with the project ownership reverting to the City without cost. The potential for such a provision can take the place of a service contract guarantee by the contractor. During the contract, the City retains the responsibility for rate setting, billing, collection and administrative services. The potential "value for money" increases with increasing private participation in the project. This comes with reduced owner control and higher procurement costs. The key to delivery of any project is to ensure that the "value - for -money" benefits outweigh the cost impact of that delivery. Therefore, it becomes important for the public sector to fully appreciate the risks related to the project and objectives the project is seeking to meet. Table 2-2 provides at a glance the sources for "value for money" or increased cost impact under each delivery model Table 2-2 Comparison of Project Delivery Options - Value for Money and Increased Cost Source For: Project Delivery Method DBB DB DBO DBFO (P3) for Money Value Better allocation of Risk Transfer Very low Low Medium High Reduced Whole Life Cycle Costs Low Low Medium High Better Incentive to Perform Low Medium High Very High Acceleration of Infrastructure Provision Low Some Some Medium Faster Implementation Low Medium High Very High Increased Costs Procurement Costs Low Medium High High Private Finance Premium None Low Low High Tax Leakage None None Medium High Profit Taking Medium Medium High High 72 Implementation Phasing Plan November 2016 R p Fri CR kailo'` TischlerBlse DESIGN BUILD OPERATE DESIGN BUILD FINANCE OPERATE DB DBO LNV ® Stantec A public entity gives up greater control over a project as they transfer risk to a private enterprise. This is illustrated in Figure 2-6. Figure 2-6 Relative Risk Transfer with Various Alternative Delivery Approaches TECHNICAL & FINANCIAL RISK ON PUBLIC ENTITY TRADITIONAL PUBLIC O&M DBFO PUBLIC BUILD OWN OPERATE PRIVATE DESIGN BUILD TURNKEY PRIVATE OPERATE AND MAINTAIN TECHNICAL & FINANCIAL RISK SHARING WITH PRIVATE ENTITY ALTERNATIVE larOg7_TilaltVIRIS PRIVATE PRIVATE BUILD OWN OPERATE In our experience the number of bidders on a project is driven by the chosen delivery method. We have typically seen more competitors bid DBB projects with fewer bidding DBFO or P3 pursuits. However, the more sophisticated delivery approaches tend to attract larger more sophisticated entities. The relative number of bidders typically bidding alternative water delivery projects is as indicated here in Figure 2-7. Figure 2-7 The Project Triangle - Anticipated Number of Bidders for Various Project Delivery Approaches DBFO 3 -4 Competitors DBO 3 - 5 Competitors DB 5 - 7 Competitors \Ns\ The Texas Legislature enacted enabling legislation starting around 2011 to allow delivery of civil projects, including water infrastructure projects, using alternative delivery methods such as Construction Manager at -Risk (CMAR), Design Build (DB), and Public Private Partnership (P3) and their variations. A number of water projects have been undertaken via alternative delivery in the last few years and interest is growing among water utilities to use these methods. A summary of some recent Texas water project undertaken via alternative delivery is summarized as Table 2-3. Path C R G kaiok Tisch &use November 2016 Implementation Phasing Plan 73 Stantec LNV Table 2-3 Examples of Recent Alternative Delivery Water Projects in Texas City/Utility Project Project Size Delivery Method Primary Driver for Selected Delivery Method SAWS Vista Ridge Water Supply Project $450 M P3 Transfer of risk of capital funding to private sector eliminating the need to bond the project. City of Midland T Bar Well Field 35 MGD well field P3 City was essentially out of water due to drought. Project timing drove decision to go P3. City of Houston North East Water Treatment Facility $1 Billion 240- mgd expansion PDB City needs to be off groundwater by 2024 so timing was the driver. Austin 80-mgd North Water Treatment Plant $500 M CMAR One of the primary drivers was to better manage constructability risks. San Jacinto River Authority 30-mgd WTP $150M CMAR Primary driver was to minimize constructability risks and minimize construction cost overruns. 2.3.2 Proposed Implementation Plan 2.3.2.1 Summary of Key Project Elements and Associated Risks The key project elements associated with implementation of Option 4D along with the key implementation risks are summarized here in Table 2-4. Rehabilitation and small upgrade projects identified in the physical condition survey would likely be delivered under traditional DBB delivery or some form of job order contracting (JOC) arrangement. Table 2-4 I<ey Project Elements and Associated Critical Implementation Risks Project Time Frame Estimated Cost ($M) Key Risk Elements Oso WRP BNR upgrade and Expansion 0-5 year $72 M • Constructability associated with existing plant • Impact of construction on existing plant operations. • Inability to secure discharge permit. • Higher cost due to unforeseen circumstances. • Estimated operations cost savings not achieved. Greenwood PS and Force main 0-5 Year $73 M • Ability to secure required easements for force main. • Delay in PS and force main construction delays flow transfer to North plant and increases Greenwood WWTP sustaining capital spend. • Traffic impacts during construction. • Flooding of construction site. Laguna Madre PS and Force main 6 10 year $18 M • Ability to get permit for Oso Bay pipeline crossing. • Securing required easements for force main. • Traffic impacts during construction. New North WWTP 0-5 year $103 M • Ability to secure suitable project site. • Delay in getting effluent discharge permit for new plant. • New plant construction not completed on time resulting in additional sustaining capital spend at Greenwood. • Greenwood PS and force main not ready in time to commission new plant. • Operations cost savings not attained post construction. Allison PS and Force main 11-15$22 years M • Securing required easements for force main. • Traffic impacts during construction. 74 Implementation Phasing Plan November 2016 Haigh C R kali©'` Tischl reBEse• The key risks for the Laguna Madre PS and force main, Allison PS and force main and similar projects are related to securing easements and neighborhood issues such as traffic impacts. The City is likely in the best position to deal with these risks and a DB contractor would likely charge a significant risk premium to deal with these risks. In addition, all of these projects can be constructed by smaller contractors and none is particularly time sensitive. For these reasons, a competitive DBB procurement is most appropriate for these four projects. The Greenwood PS and force main, North WWTP, and Oso WRP projects are time sensitive. The North WWTP will also not be able to be started up until the Greenwood PS is operational. This suggests the most appropriate approach to constructing these two projects is to execute these in parallel or as one large project. The most appropriate approach from a timing perspective would be to bid these projects as two separate projects allowing contractors and contracting teams to bid both and offer potential cost and schedule efficiencies to the City. 2.3.2.2 Multiple Criteria Analysis The Multi -Criteria Analysis (MCA) is a qualitative analysis evaluation method which uses criteria based on the project goals and procurement objectives to compare the procurement models. A matrix evaluation is used to score and rank each of the alternatives. The projects that were evaluated via MCA included: • Greenwood PS and Force Main • New North WWTP • Oso WRP BNR Upgrade and Expansion The MCA matrix was constructed and presented during a workshop with City staff. In the dedicated workshop, qualitative criteria were reviewed for inclusion in the analysis and finalized. Weightings and scoring was then reviewed and finalized. The use of the Multiple Criteria Analysis helped determine the alternative that maximizes overall value of the project and also meets established project criteria compared against the others and leads to the recommended procurement model. Rath C 1" R kalio "` TischlerBise G LNV ® Stantec The following project delivery methods are recommended based upon the results of the MCA analyses: • Greenwood PS and Force Main (DB) • New North WWTP (DBO) • Oso WRP BNR Upgrade and Expansion (CMAR) The City plans to offer industrial reuse water to interested industries in the next 10 -years. The timing for providing reuse water depends upon interest and ability to bring a minimum number of industries under contract to support the capital investment. The market risk and associated implementation is something the private sector is better equipped to manage than the City. For these reasons, we are recommending Industrial Reuse be implemented as a P3 project. 2.4. Interim Operations Plan 2.4.1 Introduction The transition from the existing six plant operation to a four plant operation over the next 20 years requires careful planning to reduce the risk of over -spending on facilities destined to be taken out of service while maximizing O&M savings associated with anticipated staffing reductions. The currently proposed project schedule allows the City to reduce the existing treatment plant upgrading costs presented in Table 2-9 by approximately $133 M. As the facilities are improved, replaced, or removed from service, current staffing levels need to be adjusted to provide acceptable levels of operation and improved levels of maintenance. We are estimating an overall staffing reduction of 13 full-time equivalents (FTEs) during the first 15 years of the plan. The estimated reduction in repair costs quoted previously were based on the facilities being removed from service in the first 5 years. Schedule slippage will require additional sustaining capital spend to keep existing facilities in service. Should schedule slippage occur, a review of the proposed projects should be conducted and implementation of deferred projects should be initiated. November 2016 Implementation Phasing Plan 75 Stantec `NV 2.4.2 Optimization of Existing Plant Repair Program The consulting team met with senior plant operations staff to critically review the list of upgrading and repair projects identified during the physical condition survey and summarized in Section 1.1.2. The primary objectives of these meetings was to identify the most critical projects required to allow safe and reliable operations and ongoing permit compliance until such time as the facility is taken out of service. This optimization exercise reduces the capital cost for Option 4D by a further $ 50 M. The revised overall capital spend for Option 4D would therefore be $ 776 M. These projects should be reviewed with City senior staff prior to finalizing the overall capital program. 2.4.3 Staffing Transition Plan The primary driver for selecting Option 4D was the potential for O&M cost savings through a reduction in current staffing levels. The consulting team reviewed existing labor categories as part of this assessment to confirm the City has the appropriate mix of skills on staff and in future. Our initial review suggests the City has a large number of staff working in operations and very few if any maintenance related staff. A transition plan is therefore required to begin transitioning plant staffing from a primarily operations oriented focus to a combination of operations and maintenance staffing. As vacancies occur in the facility staffing, a long term view of filling vacancies based on future skill needs should be utilized. A preliminary recommendation on staffing levels by employment category over the next 15 years is presented in Table 2-5. The information provided in the table serves as the basis for development of a staffing transition plan in consultation with the City. The final plan needs to take into account anticipated attrition rates, existing skill levels and future skills requirements. Job descriptions need to be developed for each of the identified employment categories as part of the final staffing plan development. Table 2-5 Preliminary Recommendation on Staffing Levels by Employment Category FTE Classification Existing Proposed Year 5 Proposed Year 10 Proposed Year 15 Final Change from Existing Lead Operator 4 3.5 3.5 3 -1 Operator 57 31 31 27 -30 Maintenance Mechanic 12 12 11 +11 Electrician 3 3 3 +3 Instrument Tech 3 3 3 +3 Laborer 1 1 1 +1 TOTAL 61 53.5 53.5 48 -13 Several assumptions were made concerning staffing levels. Staffing at New Broadway WWTP and Whitecap WWTP were maintained at current levels until such time as facility and equipment improvements were made and an extensive SCADA system has been implemented. SCADA allows for remote monitoring and control and is an integral part of the cost reduction plan. New facilities include extensive SCADA control, energy efficient systems and energy recovery where appropriate. The staffing plan will need to include a significant increase in maintenance staffing levels. During the Facility and Operational assessments it became evident that required maintenance levels at all the facilities were not being met. In order to obtain cost savings over the study period, maintenance levels at the facilities must increase. Maintenance staffing must be accomplished through skill based assessments of existing staff with reassignment and/or retraining and hiring from outside where required. It should be noted, that the current recommendation is based upon completing the North WWTP as a DBO with operations provided by a private operator. This use of a private operator will reduce the overall staff contingent by a further 14 staff for the duration of the operating portion of the DBO contract. This issue requires further discussion with City management staff. 76 Implementation Phasing Plan November 2016 Rp Fri CR kailo'` TlschlerBise 2.4.4 Operations During Construction The three primary construction projects associated with Option 4D include the Greenwood PS and force main, new North WWTP, and Oso WRP upgrade and expansion. We are proposing the following during the construction phase of each project: • The existing plant operations staff will continue to operate the Oso WRP during construction. The CM will prepare a detailed bypass and shut down plan in consultation with the City and design engineer to minimize the impact upon existing plant operations. • The DBO contractor for the new North Treatment Plant will operate the new facility for a minimum of two years post -construction. We are proposing the operations of the new Greenwood PS be included in the DBO contractors scope of operation. The Greenwood PS and North WWTP operations would be transferred over to the City at the end of the operations contract. • All other plants would continue to be operated by existing City O&M staff. 2.5. Stakeholder Management Plan Although a great deal of information and knowledge has been gathered from stakeholders in this exploratory phase of the project, there is more to be learned as it relates to the development of a stakeholder management plan as we prepare for the planning and implementation phases of the project. An effective stakeholder management plan is built upon a process that is values -based, decisions -oriented and goal -driven. Some of the key elements of a successful stakeholder engagement plan include: • Effective stakeholder engagement acknowledges the desire for humans to participate in decisions that affect them. • Effective stakeholder engagement facilitates understanding. • Effective stakeholder engagement improves decisions by - bringing all perspectives to the table, - identifying critical issues early; and, - promoting opportunities for the building of understanding and balanced review of the problem or opportunity. We are recommending a follow-up workshop to determine the stakeholder management plan elements for the next phase of the project once the City has adopted the proposed long term servicing option and associated program elements. This workshop will establish critical components to implement as part of the stakeholder engagement plan. Some of these elements may include: R nth c R kaiak Tisc r use ® e G LNV ® Stantec • Stakeholder Baseline Data • Background review of stakeholder groups • Review and assessment of stakeholder issues and expectations • Decision scope and timeline, as it relates to stakeholder engagement • Stakeholder engagement process objectives • Determine the level of engagement and promise the following to the stakeholders: - INFORM > "We will keep you informed." - CONSULT > "We will keep you informed, listen to your concerns and provide feedback on decisions made." - INVOLVE > "We will ensure your concerns are directly reflected in the alternatives developed and provide feedback on decisions made." - COLLABORATE > "We will look to you for the advice and innovation in formulating solutions and incorporate your advice and recommendations in to the decisions made." - EMPOWER > "We will implement what you decide." • Stakeholder Engagement Techniques • Information required by stakeholders, related to (1) process and (2) content • Input needed from stakeholders • Engagement technique selection (some potential techniques for this projects below) - Public Information Campaign - Project Advisory Committee • Feedback required from stakeholders • Stakeholder Engagement Evaluation • Evaluate each technique. • How did it contribute to achieving the technique objective? • Analyze each stakeholder engagement objective. • How did it contribute to achieving the stakeholder management plan objectives? • Evaluate the contribution of the overall stakeholder engagement process to the project planning and implementation phases of the project. - How did it contribute to achieving the overall project objective? The project team recommends this stakeholder engagement planning workshop take place in early September, so the plan can be utilized and implemented during all future phases of the project. Workshop participants should include City staff and stakeholders who have been actively engaged in the WWMP project thus far. November 2016 Implementation Phasing Plan 77 Implementation Programming Schedule /Pis' psl 350 0.£ UCMOSS `NV Stantec 3.0 Implementation Programming Schedule 3.1. Introduction The proposed program implementation schedule is presented in this section. The main objectives were to: • Identify the trigger factors for each of the key project elements. • Identify critical risk factors associated with project implementation and the appropriate risk mitigation plan to address these. • Present the final capital improvement plan schedule and projects. 3.2. Project Implementation Triggers The City has asked that the consulting team identify implementation triggers for each of the key projects. It should be noted that reasonable implementation triggers have long passed for most if not all of the key projects identified in this report. The rationale for this statement is summarized as follows: • The majority of future growth is anticipated to occur in both the Oso and Greenwood sewer shed. The 2015 flow for the Oso and Greenwood plants are at 82% and 79% of the plants respective rated capacities. According to the Texas Administrative Code (TAC) 305.126(a) "whenever flow measurements for any sewage treatment plant facility in the state reaches 75 percent of the permitted average daily or annual average flow for three consecutive months, the permittee must initiate engineering and financial planning for expansion and/or upgrading of the wastewater treatment and/or collection facilities." Currently Greenwood WWTP and Oso WRP are beyond the 75 percent threshold and planning will have to take place to satisfy the TAC 305.126(a) ruling. Plant expansion is required at both Oso and Greenwood now. Path C R G kaiak Tisch &use • The Greenwood plant is located within the floodplain and the site has flooded twice this year. This has indirectly resulted in a spill to nearby La Volla Creek. The existing plant is in poor physical shape and requires over $60 M in repair. The existing plant needs to be replaced now. Therefore, construction of the new North WWTP needs to proceed as soon as possible. • Building a new plant to replace the existing Greenwood facility will take approximately five years meanwhile the site and local residents are susceptible to flooding impacts. Doing nothing for the next five years while residents wait is not recommended. The redirection of flows from the McBride and Arcadia Pumping Stations to the Broadway WWTP will reduce the flow to Greenwood in the short term reducing flooding potential. These projects will also increase the use of reserve capacity at the Broadway WWTP which the City paid over $50 M for only three years ago. • Priority projects (0 to 5 year time period) identified during the physical condition survey need to be reviewed with City staff and the most critical projects need to proceed now. • The work plan for the collection system outlined in the upcoming consent decree cannot wait and the City needs to proceed with the identified program in an expeditious manner. Key projects that can be delayed, and the associated trigger factor for these include: • Construction of the Allison PS and force main to direct flow from the Allison sewer shed to the new North Plant. The trigger for this work is completion of the North plant construction. • Construction of the Laguna Madre PS and force main to direct flow from the Laguna Madre sewer shed to the upgraded and expanded Oso WRP. The trigger for this work is completion of the planned plant expansion at Oso. November 2016 Implementation Programming Schedule 78 Stantec LNV 3.3. Proposed Program Implementation Schedule The proposed implementation schedule for the key projects is summarized here in Table 3-1 measured from the point of decision for start of the wastewater management plan. The implementation schedule is presented in five year increments. The detailed cash flow spend is presented in the cash flow model enclosed here as Appendix F. Table 3-1 Program Implementation Schedule Program Element Implementation Time Frame Cost 0-5 yr. 6-10 yr. 11-15 yr. 16-20 yr. Collection System Upgrades Associated with Reducing Overflows $382 M Allison WWTP Repair and Rehab $17 M Allison PS and Force main $22 M Broadway WWTP Repair and Rehab $15 M Oso WRP Repair and Rehab $81 M Oso WRP BNR Upgrade & Expansion $72 M Greenwood Repair and Rehab $14 M Greenwood PS and Force main $73 M Laguna Madre Repair and Rehab $7 M Laguna Madre PS and Force main $18 M New North WWTP $103 M Whitecap WWTP Repair and Rehab $23 M 3.4. Risk Management Plan Awide range of risks can impact the successful execution of this overall wastewater servicing program. The full range of these risks was highlighted in Section 3.3. These risks can generally be grouped into two broad categories - those that impact the scope through project planning and those that impact results of the project execution. As noted in the Section 3.4, dividing the program into suitable sized projects and selecting an appropriate project delivery method for each project can manage the risks associated with the execution including the procurement, design, construction, operation and maintenance. Assigning responsibility for each element of the project execution to the team or professionals most able to control the outcomes will typically result in an overall lower risk to the City. However, the planning level risks such as site selection, permitting, and regulatory compliance are of a fundamental nature that remain with the City and cannot easily be transferred to a DB, DBO or P3 partner. In particular, there is a considerable degree of uncertainty with respect to the regulatory regime and future treatment requirements for both existing and new plants. Each of the existing facilities operates under a permit from TCEQwhich is renewable every five years. Of the six existing facilities, one permit renewal (Oso) is administratively complete but is still under review; two permits (Laguna Madre and New Broadway) have recently expired and need renewal; and three permits (Greenwood, Whitecap and Allison) expire within the next 18 months. There is no certainty that renewal will be given in a timely manner or with similar conditions to current permits. The City currently is experiencing considerable increased costs to meet new permit requirements at aged facilities that were never designed to provide that level of treatment. The risk of continued changes to future treatment requirements is one of the primary drivers leading the City to consider consolidation of their facilities. The evaluation of the wastewater servicing options has considered this regulatory uncertainty and higher weighting was given to options that were flexible to adapt to future requirements. The identified project elements of the preferred Option 4D as described above are the most likely outcomes based on the consultant team's evaluation of the current and future requirements. These outcomes may however need to be adapted to meet future changes in conditions and it is recommended that a range of potential alternative strategies should be identified. The highest priority elements for the Option 4D are the expansion of the Oso plant and construction of the new North plant. A summary of potential risk elements, assessed risk factor (Low, Medium or High) and alternative strategies for these two sites are provided in Table 3-2. It should be noted that any high risk elements have already been addressed in the proposed project elements for the preferred option. 79 Implementation Programming Schedule November 2016 nein C R G lk hallo'' TNschr ii se. LNV Stantec Table 3-2 Potential Alternative Strategies Project/Site Key Risk Elements Risk Alternative Strategy Oso WRP BNR upgrade and Expansion Unable to continue use of existing site Low • Pump flow to Laguna Madre and build new plant on that site (as per Option 4A) Oso WRP BNR upgrade and Expansion Unable to renew permit for existing discharge to Oso Bay Med • Keep Oso plant on site but consider alternative outfall discharge such as Corpus Christi Bay or Laguna Madre OR • Pump flow to Laguna Madre and build new plant on that site (as per Option 4A) Oso WRP BNR upgrade and Expansion Unable to secure permit for expanded discharge to Oso Bay Med • Keep Oso plant at existing size, redirect south portion of service area and Laguna Madre to Greenwood PS and pump to North Plant (Alternative Option 4E) Oso WRP BNR upgrade and Expansion Unable to secure permit for any discharge to either Oso Bay or Laguna Madre Low • Pump flow from Oso to North plant and build larger new plant (as per Option 3A) New North WWTP Unable to secure a new site Low • Build new plant on existing Allison site (Option 2B) New North WWTP Unable to secure a permit for discharge into Ship Channel Low • Consider discharge to one or combination of Oso Creek and/or Nueces River As noted above, many of the Alternative Scenarios incorporate elements of the other wastewater servicing options considered earlier during the evaluation process. There will be opportunity to refine these strategies further once more clarity is available on some of these risk elements, especially regarding the permit renewal for Oso WRP. For instance, one "hybrid" option that can be implemented is to split the Oso service area roughly in half along the line of the SPID. The new development and growth in the southern half can be pumped to the new North Plant via the Greenwood PS and the northern half can continue to flow to and be treated at the existing Oso WRP. This Alternative - called Option 4E is depicted in Figure 3-1. Figure 3-1 Alternative Option 4E Legend New Treatment Plant Close Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant - Wastewater Pipeline 3 Reuse Pipeline 2.5 10 AWi Path C R G kalnkTisch &Ise November 2016 Implementation Programming Schedule 80 Stantec LNV 3.5. Fund Requirement Schedule The estimated cash flow requirements for the recommended servicing plan are summarized here in Table 3-3. All capital costs are presented here in 2016 constant dollars. The capital spend by project and year is included with the cash flow models presented in Appendix F. Table 3-3 Summary of Fund Requirements Program Element Collection System Upgrades Associated with Reducing Overflows Implementation Time Frame 0-5 yr. 6-10 yr. 11-15 yr. 16-20 yr. $127 M $127 M $127 M Allison WWTP Repair and Rehab $13 M $4 M Allison PS and Force main $22 M Broadway WWTP Repair and Rehab $11 M $3 M $1 M Oso WRP Repair and Rehab $54 M $3 M $6 M $18 M Oso WRP BNR Upgrade & Expansion $72 M Greenwood Repair and Rehab $14 M Greenwood PS and Force main $73 M Laguna Madre Repair and Rehab $7 M Laguna Madre PS and Force main $18 M New North WWTP $103M Whitecap WWTP Repair and Rehab $19 M $2 M $2 M TOTALS $493 M $155 M $157 M $21 M The total estimated capital spend for Option 4D is approximately $826 M with O&M savings over the next 30 -years of approximately $60 M relative to the benchmark option of maintaining the six existing wastewater treatment plants. 81 Implementation Programming Schedule November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse 5 Stantec Wastewater Management Plan Final Report Council Presentation January 24, 2017 Study Objectives • Confirm the state of the existing wastewater infrastructure. • Develop a long-term wastewater plan to address environmental compliance needs, growth, and costs. • Identify the appropriate schedule and associated delivery methods for project implementation. 2 Existing Wastewater System wa, • City of Corpus Christi c °" Wastewater Service Areas Laguna MaJr® Miles 0 2 4 12 3 Treatment Plant Conditions • Treatment Plant repairs are estimated to cost a total of approx. $220M • Staffing levels at the existing six plants are within benchmark ranges • Energy and chemical costs are well above benchmark levels • Customer utility rates are currently among the highest in Texas 4 Key Study Findings • Current user rates are unaffordable • The existing plants (particularly Oso and Greenwood) require a significant sustaining capital spend • There are significant opportunities to reduce O&M costs at the existing facilities but capital is required • Flooding at Greenwood is a significant issue that needs to be addressed 5 Sub -options Summary of Options Considered Description 1— Maintain Six Existing Plants Keep all six plants. Continue with • Not applicable current operations and planned maintenance. 2 - Consolidate at Existing Plant sites 3 - Consolidate at New Plant site 4- Combination of New and Existing Keep Broadway & Whitecap. Consolidate remainder at two of the existing plant sites. Keep Broadway & Whitecap. Consolidate remainder at one new plant site. Keep Broadway & Whitecap. Consolidate remainder at two sites with at least one new site plus an existing site. • Allison + Laguna Madre • Allison + Oso • North site • Southwest site • Southeast site • North + Laguna Madre • Southwest + Laguna Madre • North + Southeast • North + Oso (Recommended) 6 User Rates • Options evaluation included estimated user rate impacts (81% to 99%) for time horizon 2015 to 2035. • Estimated increase in user rates (2015 -2035) associated with recommended plan 84%. • Historical benchmark comparison between 2005 and 2015 of 110%. 7 Recommended Servicing Option Legend New Treatment Plant Greenwoo Close Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant Elm Expand Treatment Plant - Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline 74 oadway 8 Recommended Servicing Options n "restructure equrrements Collection System Allison North Treatment Plant Greenwood • Collection System upgrades associated with reducing overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to the Broadway sewer shed in the interim • Repair over the next 10 years • Decommission plant after 10 -years and build new pumping station to direct flows to new North Treatment plant • Construct new 12 million gallons per day (MGD) facility at the North Treatment plant site over the next 5 years. • Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry over the next 10 years. • Repair over next 5 years • Demolish and decommission plant after 5 year time period • Build new pumping station at Greenwood site to transfer flows to new North Plant. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years Oso Laguna Madre Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years • Upgrade plant to biological nutrient removal (BNR) and expand to 20 million gallons per day (MGD) over next 5 years • Repair over next 10 years • Demolish and decommission plant after 10 year period • Build new pumping station at Laguna Madre site to transfer flows to Oso Plant • Repair over next 20 years 9 Projected Cash Flow Requirements Program Element Collection System Upgrades 0-5 yr. $127 M Allison WWTP Repair and Rehab Allison PS and Forcemain $13 M Broadway WWTP Repair and Rehab $11 M Oso WRP Repair and Rehab $54 M Oso WRP BNR Upgrade & Expansion $72 M Greenwood Repair and Rehab $14 M Greenwood PS and Force main $73 M Laguna Madre Repair and Rehab $7 M Laguna Madre PS and Force main New North WWTP $103 M Whitecap WWTP Repair and Rehab $19 M Implementation Time Frarne 6-10 yr. $ 127 M 11-15 yr. $ 127 M $4 M $22 M $3 M $3 M $6 M $18 M $2 M 16-20 yr. $1 M $18 M $2 M TOTALS $493 M $155 M $157 M $21 M 10 Recommended Delivery Method A multi criteria analysis (MCA) was conducted to confirm the best delivery method for each project: Project Laguna Madre PS and Force Main Allison PS and Force Main Greenwood PS and Force Main New North WWTP Oso WRP BNR Upgrade & Expansion Industrial Reuse Delivery Method Design -Bid -Build (DBB) Design -Bid -Build (DBB) Design -Build (DB) Design -Build -Operate (DBO) Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) Public Private Partnership (P3) 11 Proposed Next Steps • Council review and approval of Plan. • Request for Proposal (RFP) for Program Manager. • Set up Program Management Office (PMO) and finalize program details and schedule. • Program Implementation. 12 Questions? 13 No i Decision Process Develop Prescreening Criteria for Each of Option 1 Prescreen options selecting 3 (2 + the status quo) i Detailed User Rate Impact evaluation (includes sensitivity analysis). Does option provide lowest user rate im.act? Can rate impact be mitigated through alternative delivery 1 i Option eliminated from further consideration 1 IIllll llillllllllIlll Addr a sses issues at Greenwood Maintains minimum receiver base flows These are the options that meet city minimum criteria and provide lowest life cycle cost plus comparable or better cash flow relative 10 existin CIP Preferred Alternative — Lowest Overall Rate Impact 14 Industrial, Commercial, and Residential Waste Sewage travels through sewers to lift stations How does the Collection/Treatment System Work? Lift Stations Pump waste to the treatment plant Screening Removes trash and other large Items Off to the landfill Disinfection A final safety step Clarification and Aeration Removes organic materials leaving cleaned water Grit Chambers Help solids, such as coffee grounds and sand, settle out of The water Recycled to rivers, streams, and the gulf :antes Existing Treatment Plants Allison WWTP Built in 1966 Receives 18% flow from meat packing plant Treatment process activated sludge operated in plug flow Current plant capacity of 5 MGD treating approximately 3 MGD currently. Averages: 4 mg/L BODS & 6 mg/L TSS 16 Existing Treatment Plants Broadway WWTP Original built in 1938 and new plant built in 2014 on same site Activated sludge with UV Current plant capacity of 8 MGD treating approximately 5 MGD currently. 17 Existing Treatment Plants Greenwood WWTP Built in 1959, expanded in 2000 Activated sludge with UV Current plant capacity of 8 MGD treating approximately 6 MGD currently. Serves the Corpus Christi International Airport 18 Existing Treatment Plants Oso WRP Built in 1941, expanded in 1982 Largest of the City's plants Contact activated sludge treatment process Current plant capacity of 16 MGD treating approximately 12 MGD currently. 19 Existing Treatment Plants Laguna Madre WWTP Built in 1971, expanded in 1986 Manned by common staff with Whitecap WWTP Current plant capacity of 3 MGD treating approximately 2 MGD currently. Activated sludge process 20 Existing Treatment Plants Whitecap WWTP Built in 1947, expanded in 1991 Smallest of the City's plants Contact activated sludge treatment process Current plant capacity of 2.5 MGD treating approximately 1.1 MGD currently. 21 Anticipated Treatment Requirements • Conventional (Secondary) treatment is the anticipated requirement for discharge to Ship Channel or Laguna Madre • Advanced (Tertiary) treatment is the anticipated requirement for discharge to Oso Creek, Oso Bay, Nueces Delta and Nueces River. This treatment would include filtration, advanced disinfection and nutrient removal • The City is currently in negotiation with EPA over Dissolved Oxygen (DO) standards for Oso Bay. If EPA does not grant a favorable standard the City could either close the plant or relocate the discharge • There are currently no discharges to Nueces Bay or Corpus Christi Bay and none are being recommended 22 PRIVATE BUILD OWN OPERATE Partnership and Project Delivery Options TECHNICAL & FINANCIAL RISK ON PUBLIC ENTITY PUBLIC DB PRIVATE PUBLIC BUILD OWN OPERATE PRIVATE DESIGN BUILD TURNKEY O&M PRIVATE OPERATE AND MAINTAIN DBO DESIGN BUILD OPERATE TECHNICAL & FINANCIAL RISK SHARING WITH PRIVATE ENTITY DBFO DESIGN BUILD FINANCE OPERATE n.[M9 12Cai5695 23 What is Project Risk? • What is Project Risk? — Probability of an unfavorable event having a negative financial impact upon a project investment • How Does Risk Impact Selection of Delivery Method? — Risk can be managed and/or mitigated — Private sector participation in public infrastructure delivery based on mitigation or delegation of project specific risks to limit public sector exposure — Value for money maximized by allocating risk optimally (allocating each risk to party best able to manage it in theory reducing individual risk premiums and costs) 24 The Project Triangle DBOF 3 - 4 Competitors DBO 3 - 5 Competitors DB 5 -7 Competitors 25 Delivery Options Comparison Project Delivery Models Source For: DBB DB DBO DBFO Value for Money Better Allocation of RiskTransfer Very Low Low Medium High Reduced Whole Life Costs Low Low Medium High Better Incentive to Perform Low Medium. High Very High Economies of Scale Very Low Low Medium High Acceleration of Infrastructure Provision Low Some Some Medium Faster Implementation Low Medium High Very High Increased Costs Procurement Costs Low Medium High High Private Finance Premium None Low Low High Tax Leakage None None Medium High Profit Taking Medium Medium High High 26 Risk Adjusted Pricing 5,000 Tiiab Frequency View PV Comparison $300.000,000 5400000,000 $500 000,000 300 270 240 210 160 rn -- 150 7 120 90 60 30 0 $600„000,000 CMAR PV • DBPV ▪ DBFO PV • DBOPV 27 AGENDA MEMORANDUM One -Time Action Item for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 DATE: January 17, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Tom Tagliabue, Director, Intergovernmental Relations tomtag@cctexas.com 361.826.3850 RESOLUTION Supporting The Introduction of Legislation Authorizing A Motor Fuels Tax On A Local Option Basis For Residential Street Funding CAPTION: Resolution of The City of Corpus Christi, Texas, supporting the introduction of legislation authorizing a motor fuel tax on a local option basis for residential street funding. PURPOSE: Requests members of the Coastal Bend legislative delegation to file legislation giving the City of Corpus Christi authority to have a local option election to levy a motor fuels tax (gasoline, diesel, gasoline blended fuel, compressed natural gas, liquefied natural gas, and other products, per Section 162.001 (42), Tax Code) sold within the city limits of the City of Corpus Christi for the specific purpose of generating funding to repair and maintain city streets. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The City of Corpus Christi has approximately 1,234 miles of streets, including approximately 852 miles of residential streets. Street maintenance has been deferred to the point that 48% of City residential streets are considered to be in "Fair" and "Good" condition and 52% are considered to be in "Poor" condition. It is important for the City to prevent the Good streets from further deterioration. On October 20, 2015, the City Council passed a resolution approving the formation of a Ad Hoc Residential Street Infrastructure Advisory Committee (Committee) to develop a Residential Street Reconstruction Plan. In its final report presented to City Council on June 21, 2016, the Committee found that the amount of money that the City would have to spend to maintain and replace residential street on a 60 -year cycle would be approximately $71 million per year. The current City budget does not have sufficient funding to fully fund residential street repairs. , In 2013 and 2015, the City of Corpus Christi's legislative priorities for the 83rd and 84th Regular Sessions of the Texas Legislature included seeking statutory authority to generate additional revenues for street maintenance and repair, but to date, has not been successful in getting legislation filed. The sale of motor fuels in Texas generates approximately $3.6 billion in revenues annually for the State of Texas, but no funds are allocated for local residential streets. It is estimated that a local option motor fuels tax, if approved by voters, could generate approximately $2.5 million annually in the City of Corpus Christi to address the funding gap for residential street repair and maintenance. ALTERNATIVES: The Council can choose to: 1. Adopt the resolution. 2. Not adopt the resolution. 3. Make revisions to the resolution. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: n/a EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital X Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the resolution. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS SUPPORTING THE INTRODUCTION OF LEGISLATION AUTHORIZING A MOTOR FUEL TAX ON A LOCAL OPTION BASIS FOR RESIDENTIAL STREET FUNDING WHEREAS, The City of Corpus Christi has approximately 1,234 miles of streets, including approximately 852 miles of residential streets; and WHEREAS, Over the years, numerous factors, including funding constraints and new street miles being added to the city's inventory at a faster rate than the growth of the tax base and population, have resulted in deferred maintenance of city streets, and furthered deterioration of the street infrastructure; and WHEREAS, Street maintenance has been deferred to the point that 48% of City residential streets are considered to be in "Fair" and "Good" condition and 52% are considered to be in "Poor" condition. It is important for the City to prevent the Good streets from further deterioration; and WHEREAS, In 2013 and 2015, the City of Corpus Christi's legislative priorities for the 83rd and 84th Regular Sessions of the Texas Legislature included seeking statutory authority to generate additional revenues for street maintenance and repair, but to date, has not been successful in getting legislation filed; and WHEREAS, In October 20, 2015, the City Council passed a resolution approving the formation of an Ad Hoc Residential Street Infrastructure Advisory Committee to develop a Residential Street Reconstruction Plan; and WHEREAS, In its final report presented to City Council on June 21, 2016, the Ad Hoc Residential Street Infrastructure Committee found that the amount of money that the City would have to spend to maintain and replace residential streets on a 60 -year cycle would be approximately $71 million per year; and WHEREAS, The current City budget does not have sufficient funding to fully fund residential street repairs; and WHEREAS, On January 10, 2017, The City Council adopted its legislative policy priorities that included support of legislation that would allow local governments and/or voters to consider additional funding options for cities to address streets that are not otherwise met by current funding sources; and WHEREAS, Sales of gasoline and diesel fuel are subject to State tax of 20 cents per gallon per Sections 162.102 and 162.202 of the Tax Code and sales of compressed natural gas are subject to State tax of 15 cents per gallon per Section 162.353; and WHEREAS, Sales of gasoline, diesel, and compressed natural gas are exempt from state and local sales tax per Tax Code Sections 151.308 and 321.208; and WHEREAS, Tax Code Section 162.001 (42) defines "Motor fuel" as "gasoline, diesel fuel, gasoline blended fuel, compressed natural gas, liquefied natural gas, and other products that are offered for sale, sold, used, or capable of use as fuel for a gasoline -powered engine or a diesel -powered engine"' and WHEREAS, Sales of gasoline and diesel fuel in the State of Texas in 2016 amounted to approximately $ 3.6 Billion in revenue to the State, with Zero revenue allocated for local residential streets; and WHEREAS, The Texas Legislature has previously approved legislation for local option elections; and WHEREAS, The City believes that the most fair methodology to pay for residential street repairs is a local option motor fuel tax, which makes users of the roads pay for the maintenance and repair of the City street network; and WHEREAS, It is estimated that a local option motor fuel tax of 1 cent/gallon could yield an estimated $2.5 Million additional annual revenue for residential streets for the City of Corpus Christi; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: Section 1. That the Corpus Christi City Council hereby supports the introduction of legislation authorizing a motor fuel tax on a local option basis for residential streets. Section 2. That the Corpus Christi City Council hereby requests that the City's legislative delegation file legislation to authorize a motor fuel tax on a local option basis for residential streets. Section 3. That a copy of this Resolution be provided to the City's legislative delegation. Attest: City of Corpus Christi Rebecca Huerta, City Secretary Dan McQueen, Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas of The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Dan McQueen Rudy Garza Paulette Guajardo Michael Hunter Joe McComb Ben Molina Lucy Rubio Greg Smith Carolyn Vaughn AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 DATE: January 19, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Steven Viera, Director of Human Resources SteveV@cctexas.com (361) 826-3345 Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) Update — City of Corpus Christi STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name Steven Viera OUTSIDE PRESENTER(S): Name David Rodriguez BACKGROUND: Title/Position Department Director of Human Resources Human Resources Title/Position Senior Regional Manager Organization TM RS During the City Council meeting held on December 13, 2016, Councilman McComb requested that a presentation be provided to Council that discusses the TMRS City employee retirement plan. Texas Municipal Retirement System leaders will provide a briefing to council discussing the City of Corpus Christi employee retirement plan and will be available to answer any questions concerning the City's pension plan. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: PowerPoint — Update on Texas Municipal Retirement System for the City of Corpus Christi An Update on the Texas Municipal Retirement System for City of Corpus Christi anuar 24 2017 Presented by David Rodriguez, Senior Regional Manager TMRS History & Membership* 872 cities participate in TMRS (not Houston, Dallas, Ft. Worth, Austin, EI Paso, or Galveston). TMRS has approximately 107,000 active member accounts and 56,500 annuitants. Governed by 6 -member Board appointed by Governor with Senate approval. Participating cities vary in size from over 6,000 employees (San Antonio non -uniformed employees) to just 1 employee (15 TMRS cities). TMRS Funding Basics TMRS is a "hybrid" cash -balance defined benefit plan with statutory regulations in place that ensure oversight and responsible funding. TMRS has a strong funding policy and a healthy funded ratio around 86% with approximately $26 billion in assets.* TMRS' investment return assumption is 6.75%, one of the lowest among large public plans. Several changes have been made since 2007 to ensure long- term, advance fundin of all benefits; except Ad Hoc adoptions of Updated Service Credit and COLAs. All changes have also helped reduce volatility of city contributions from year-to-year. TMRS Makes Dollars & Sense to Cities Each city is funded as separate entity; assets are pooled for investment purposes Each city has its own assets and liabilities and Funded Ratio TMRS increases a city's competitive edge in hiring TMRS benefits are effectively portable across participating cities to help attract experienced employees Plan of choice for Texas cities; voluntary statewide retirement plan Benefits are funded by mandatory employee deposits, city contributions, and investment income Operates by local control: Each participating city controls employer costs by choosing its own options TMRS Makes Dollars & Sense for the Public The majority of a TMRS retiree's benefit is funded by investment earnings on member and city contributions over the member's career TMRS' administrative costs are low — approximately 0.24%* of assets in 2015 (including investment management fees) — compared to an average of 1.00% for 401(k)s** TMRS' actuarial investment return assumption (net of expenses) is 6.75% —one of the lowest in the country for large public sector plans TMRS Sound Investment Funding TMRS invests $26 billion in the capital markets The TMRS Investment Policy is posted on the TMRS website. Investments are made through a well -diversified portfolio over a long investment horizon. TMRS benefits provide a stable income for retirees and may reduce their need for other public services TMRS' Sound Investment Funding As members, city employees are rewarded by the prudent, diversified investment policies of the System (as opposed to relying on making personal investment decisions) A pension plan provides greater stability and less vulnerability to market fluctuations Retirement savings of TMRS members were not affected by the severe market downturn of 2008; whereas 401(k) asset values declined more than 25% on average TMRS Economic Impact TMRS benefits are economically important to Texas communities Most TMRS retirees live in the communities where they worked TMRS paid $1.2 billion in benefits and refunds in 2015, up from $1.1 billion in 2014 A past study by economist Ray Perryman used a 2.379 multiplier to estimate the "ripple" effect of each benefit dollar, resulting in a statewide economic benefit of $2.617 billion. TMRS' Actuarial Funding A sound funding policy is the key to ensuring sustainable and secure retirement benefits over all generations of workers. The city's employer contribution determined annually under this funding policy is called the Actuarially Determined Employer Contribution (ADEC) and serves as the basis for determining the Full Retirement Rate contribution under TMRS. Three keys to a strong funding policy: Actuarial cost method Asset smoothing method Amortization policy The TMRS Actuarial Funding Policy is posted on the TMRS website. TMRS Benefits Retirement is traditionally described as a "three-legged stool," comprising: Retirement Program Social Security Personal Savings 401(k)s and similar DC plans were never intended to be the primary retirement vehicle Lifetime benefits for retirees and survivors provide long-term protection Corpus Christi Benefits 6% Employee Contribution 2 to 1 match from city 5 year vesting — survivor benefits Retirement at 20 years of service or age 60 with 5 years service Restricted Prior Service Credit Military Service Credit Updated Service Credits — 100%, ad hoc COLA — 70% CPI, ad hoc Corpus Christi Actuarial Status As of 12/31/2015 Actuarial Value of Assets Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability Funded Ratio Equivalent Single Amortization Period $635,326,206 $71,142,666 89.9% 12.6 years 12 Contribution Rates for Corpus Christi* 2011 14.24% 2012 10.33% 2013 10.83% 2014 11.00% 2015 10.54% 2016 9.98% 2017 11.04% 13 QUESTIONS? • AGENDA MEMORANDUM for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 DATE: January 9, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager THROUGH: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager MarkVV@cctexas.com 361-826-3082 FROM: Dan Grimsbo, Interim Director of Water Utilities DanG@cctexas.com 361-826-1689 UPDATE TO CITY COUNCIL Water Projects STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name 1. Dan Grimsbo 2. Wes Nebgen 3. Gabriel Ramirez 4. Rafael Martinez OUTSIDE PRESENTER(S): Name 1. Logan Burton 2. Marc Santos Title/Position Interim Director Assistant Director Water Quality Manager Utility Systems Manager Title/Position Deaartment Water Utilities Water Utilities Water Utilities Water Utilities Oraanization LNV, Inc. Hazen & Sawyer, Inc. BACKGROUND: City has adopted a holistic approach and is implementing actions to address water sources, treatment, and distribution. These projects have provided improved and more stabilized water quality in the distribution system. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Presentation Water Quality Projects Update Council Presentation January 24, 2017 Boil Water Notice May 2016 • Disinfectant residuals less than 0.5 mg/L in the City's water distribution system. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) ordered the City to issue a citywide boil water notice. • Citywide boil water notice lasted 12 days. • City performed a disinfectant conversion from monochloramine to free chlorine to stabilize the water quality in the distribution system. • TCEQ minimum required disinfectant level is 0.5 mg/L throughout the distribution system at all times. Texas Administrative Code 290.46 (d) (2) (B) • Federal minimum required disinfectant level is detectable measured disinfectant level. City drinking water had a detectable disinfectant residual throughout the boil water notice. (Environmental Protection Agency Surface Water Treatment Rule) 2 Regulations Definitions • 1 Texas Administrative Code 290.46 (d) (2) (B) — "A disinfectant residual must be continuously maintained during the treatment process and throughout the distribution system. A chloramine residual of 0.5 mg/L (measured as total chlorine) for those systems that feed ammonia." • 2 Environmental Protection Agency Surface Water Treatment Rule — "A detectable disinfection residual must be maintained throughout the entire distribution system." 3 Water Quality Progress • Objective: Improve and stabilize water quality in the City's water distribution system Action: City adopted a holistic approach and has implemented actions to address the following areas: — Source — Treatment — Distribution System Status: — Significant improvements in the stability/consistency of water quality have been achieved — Longer-term CIP projects are currently underway to continue to improve overall water treatment and distribution. 4 Source Actions ACTIONS TAKEN 0 Addl. Raw Water Sampling @ Weather/Seasonal Monitoring 9 Bromide Evaluation CURRENT AND FUTURE ACTIONS O Solids Management (E13052/E16308) © Alkalinity and pH Evaluation O Pre -Sedimentation Evaluation O Raw Water Analyzers O Nueces River Pump Station Improvements 5 Solids Management Objective Minimize impact on water quality Improve operational flexibility Prepare for long term operations Status • Contractor for Sludge Removal: Selected • Selection of Eng. for Long Term: ending • Anticipated Completion : Phase -1 by 2018 6 Nueces River Raw Water Pump Station Objective Increase reliability of water delivery Reduce operational cost Ultimate design flow 200 MGD. Status • Selection of Engineers: Complete • System Design: vu% Compi • Anticipated Installation: 2018 7 Treatment Actions O Chemical Dosing Locations © Analyzer Replacement © Mixing Enhancements O Flow Pacing © Filter Flow Improvements O Process Target Changes CA Training and Procedures 0 Q New Chlorine Dioxide System Coagulant Evaluation Chlorine System Improvements Solids Removal Pilot Plant System and Testing Raw Water and Chem Feed Improvements (E12211/8643) 8 New Chlorine Dioxide System Objective • Improve control of nitrification • Reduce chlorine demand • Reduce Disinfection Byproduct Formation Status • Exception request from TCEQ: Approved • Design documents to TCEQ: Complete • Final approval of design by TCEQ: Complete • Anticipated Completion : April 2017 9 Chlorine System Improvements Objective • Increase Reliability • Improve Safety of Operations • Optimize System Control Status • Initial System Assessment: Complete • Selection of Engineer: Pending • Anticipated Completion : TBD 10 Raw Water and Chemical Feed Improvements Objective • Update Chemical Feed Equipment • Improve Chemical Mixing • Optimize System Performance Status • Selection of Engineers: Complete • System Design: 30% Complete • Anticipated Installation: 2018 11 Pilot Plant System and Testing Objective • Evaluate Changing Water Quality • Test Alternative Treatment Strategies • Optimize System Performance Status • System Design: Complete • Pilot Construction: Pending • Anticipated Installation: May 2017 12 Distribution System Actions ACTIONS TAKEN: • Cleaned all storage tanks • Evaluated and automated chlorine booster stations • Updated Nitrification Action Plan • Evaluated and changed current Conversion Procedures • Modified distribution system operations FUTURE ACTIONS: • Back-up power for Navigation and Staples Pump Stations • Additional pumps at Staples Pump Station • New analyzers at Staples and Sand Dollar Pump Stations IN PROGRESS: Tank sampling and inspections • Navigation Pump Station Monochlor Tank Shark Pilot study • Tank mixing systems 13 Updated Nitrification Action Plan Nitrification Action Plan Version 3 .August 2016 Objective • More Conservative Treatment Goals • Revised Action Levels • Refined Monitoring Plan Status • Document Revision: Complete • New Target Implementation: Complete • Monitoring and Site Actions: On-going 14 Tank Mixing and Operation Objective • Increase Turnover • Reduce Water Age • Improve Chlorine Residual Stability Status • Operational Changes: Complete • New Mixer Testing: On-going • Anticipated Installation: TBD 15 Current Capital Improvement Plan N sates River Raw Water Pump Station Rand Morgan St lemmas Bay /Elevated Storage Tank �ENWated glorage Tank Iota Steven. Fleet. DN Stevens Plant - leen Service Bullding Repaint -Clearwell No.l Repairs . reeled.. Peed DPtim Wellen . Intermediate Sludge Removal - Site Infrastructure imorevsmente -Che... Faso mea -Chlmelnc Storage and Handling rnellNlae /North /No� n Reece j Im provmenta _JSama Pel 3d' Ttenemlasinn )Conner sJ INamrcrorll Holly Rd Elevated Storage Tank( Staptes Street Pump Station Starry Rd Elevated Stor .e Tank Padre !eland Extension] JGlanmore SPID at _. Ennis Joelin 0 =2 4 6 8 eeee�MMMMEMUSS 16 Current Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Project Name Cost ($M} Start Completion', Nueces River Raw Water Pump Station 16.8 Sep 2014 Jul 2018 ON Stevens Chlorine Storage and Handling Facilities Improvements 9.0 Mar 2017 Feb 2019 ON Stevens Chemical Fecilities (Alum, Polymer and LAS) Replacement 16.7 May 2016 Jan 2020 ONSWTP Raw Water Influent Improvements 25.0 May 2016 Jan 2020 ONSWTP Interim Sludge Management Improvements 6.5 May 2016 Sep 2017 ONSWTP Fluoride Feed System Improvement 1.1 Oct 2015 Jul 2017 Alternative Capacity Power Generation (ACR Phase 1) 1.2 May 2015 Sep 2017 Staples Street Pump Stations Phase 2 - Third and Forth Pumps 3.3 May 2015 Jun 2017 Elevated Water Storage Tanks (ACR Implementation Phase 2) 12.5 Jun 2014 Feb 2018 Elevated Water Storage Tanks {ACR: Implementation Phase 3) 18.0 Oct 2016 Nov 2020 Source Treatment Distribution System 17 Summary of Current Status • City has implemented source, treatment, and distribution system actions to address water quality concerns. • City has seen significant improvements in the stability of water quality throughout the distribution system as a result of these actions. • City has several long-term projects that are currently underway to modernize the water treatment plant and distribution system. 18 AGENDA MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 DATE: TO: June 9, 2016 Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Rudy Bentancourt, Director of Housing and Community Development rudyb@cctexas.com 361-826-3021 Affordable Housing Plan STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name 1. Rudy Bentancourt 2. Daniel McGinn 3. OUTSIDE PRESENTER(S): Title/Position Department Director Housing and Comm Development Interim Director Planning Name Title/Position Organization 1. 2. BACKGROUND: During the May 10, 2016 City Council Meeting, past Mayor Martinez requested that staff bring forward an Affordable Housing Plan for review and discussion. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: PowerPoint — Affordable Housing Plan Affordable Housing Plan Affordable Housing Plan Housing and Community Development Department Council Presentation January 24, 2017 Today's Discussion 1. Housing Tax Credits 2. Federal Funding 3. How we are using them 4. Local (Type A) Funding 5. How we are using them 6. Local Programs 7. How we are using them Housing Tax Credits • Administered by the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs (TDHCA) • Designed to: ➢ Provide a source of equity financing for the development of affordable housing; ➢ Serve as a credit to the communities where the housing is to be constructed and operated; ➢ Increase the supply of affordable housing. Resolution of Support • Amenities ➢ Full perimeter fencing ➢ Equipped functional computer learning center (2 per 20 units) ➢ Furnished community room ➢ Community Laundry Room ➢ Children's playscape area (where applicable) ➢ Appropriate Zoning • FY2017-2018 ➢ Statement from Developer of meeting with Council Member of the district of the proposed project development ➢ Meeting with HCD, DS and Planning ➢ Ensure Appropriate Zoning • Future consideration - Future Land Use Future Land Use Map Affordable Housing Complexes Affordable Housing Multifamily in Corpus Christi w�E 100.0. 1466.4116 CC Housing Authority Complexes CC Housing Authority Section 8 Complexes ASINIESS Cainlain. ass Smsrdk MOO So, Corpus Marti IS 11.15. Park Treyway Sara.. Sett Manor Spa Breese Zenker lirlrys 7 Federal Funding Determination • City of Corpus Christi - Entitlement Community • Formula Determination 2013-2017 Consolidated Action Plan • 5 -year plan outlines Objectives • Objectives ➢ Non -housing Community Development (CDBG) ➢ Affordable Housing (HOME) ➢ Address Homelessness (ESG) Entitlement Programs Received • Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) - $2,404,066 • HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) - $868,482 • Emergency Solutions Grant Program (ESG) - $221,468 Departmental Programs • Demolition and Replacement Loan Program (CDBG) • Single Family Rehabilitation Grant Program (CDBG) • Minor Home Repair Grant Program (CDBG) • Veterans Minor Home Repair Grant Program (CDBG) • Down Payment Program (HOME) • Homebuyer Assistance Program (TYPE A) Homebuyer Assistance Program • Funds managed by the Corpus Christi Business and Job Development Corporation (Type A Board) • Administered by the Housing and Community Development Department • Up to $10,000 in down payment assistance (deferred forgivable loan) • Amortized over 5 years • Property value must not exceed $162,000 City Affordable Housing Programs • Infill Housing Incentive Program (IHIP) • Vacant Lot Infill Incentive Pilot Program (Proposed Program) • 12 vacant City -owned lots Next Steps • Discussion • Plan Adoption Questions 2 Affordable Housing Plan City of Corpus Christi Housing and Community Development Community Development Block Grant Home Investment Partnerships Program Emergency Solutions Grant Program Revised: January 2017 Table of Contents Background Information 3 Owner -Occupied Rehabilitation & Reconstruction 4 Refinancing Mortgages 9 Homebuyer Programs 10 Infill Housing Incentive Program (IHIP) 13 Vacant Lot Infill Incentive Pilot Program 16 Monitoring 19 Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDOs) 24 Resolutions of Support or No Objection 25 Future Land Use Map 26 Emergency Solutions Grant Program 27 Appendices 28 Appendix 1: Income Limits and Part 5 Requirements 29 Appendix 2: Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) Policy, Procedure and Standards 30 Appendix 3: HOME Program Recapture Requirements for Homebuyer Activities 32 Appendix 4: Lead Based Paint Requirements 34 Appendix 5: Environmental Review Policy, Procedures and Standards 37 Appendix 6: Regulatory Requirements 45 Appendix 7: Maps 47 2 Background Information The City of Corpus Christi (the City) receives support from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to assist low and moderate income families in obtaining affordable housing. The City receives several Entitlement (HUD) grants, which it can use to support its housing initiatives. HUD outlines certain regulations that apply when using grant funds. This policy document uses the HUD regulations as a basis and incorporates the City's own policies as adopted by City Council. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) The Community Development Block Grant has been in existence since 1974. The primary objective of the CDBG program is to improve communities by providing decent housing, providing a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities. The primary beneficiary of CDBG funds must benefit low to moderate -income persons, aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight, or meet an urgent need. HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) The HOME Investment Partnerships Program has been in existence since 1990. The goals of the HOME program are to provide decent affordable housing to lower-income households, expand the capacity of nonprofit housing providers, strengthen the ability of state and local governments to provide housing, and leverage private sector participation. HOME funds may be utilized for rental activities, homebuyer activities, and homeowner rehabilitation activities. All HOME funds must benefit persons of low and moderate income. Emergency Solutions Grant Program (ESG) The Emergency Solutions Grant Program was revised in 2012 after an amendment to the Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing Act of 2009 (Hearth Act). The ESG program provides funding to: 1. Engage homeless individuals and families living on the street; 2. Improve the number of qualify of emergency shelters for homeless individuals and families; 3. Help operate these shelters; 4. Provide essential services to shelter residents; 5. Rapid re -house homeless individuals and families, and 6. Prevent families/individuals from becoming homeless. Infill Housing Incentive Program (IHIP) The purpose of the Corpus Christi Infill Housing Incentive Program (IHIP) is to promote and encourage new home construction in existing CDBG neighborhoods on privately owned vacant lots and City owned vacant lots. This program applies to targeted areas where existing street and utility infrastructure is available to promote the development of single- family residential homes. Vacant Lot Infill Incentive Pilot Program The purpose of the Corpus Christi Vacant Lot Infill Incentive Program is to create and strengthen community partnerships and encourage new home construction in existing neighborhoods on City owned vacant lots. This program applies to targeted areas where existing street and utility infrastructure is available to promote the development of single-family residential homes. 3 Rehabilitation Grant Programs and Demolition Reconstruction Loan Program CDBG Funds may be used to assist very low and low to moderate income households that require rehabilitation of their home, or a demolition reconstruction. MINOR HOME REPAIR AND VETERANS MINOR HOME REPAIR GRANT PROGRAMS The Minor Home Repair Program is a grant up to $25,000 to assist homeowners with repairs involving the following: Roof, Plumbing, Electrical, Heating, Foundation and Minor Structural Problems MINOR HOME PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY The applicant's gross annual income must meet the HUD Income Limits for Very Low Income households. The applicant must be 62 years of age or older, or disabled. The applicant must not have ownership in any other property at the time of application. The property must reside within the city limits of Corpus Christi, and be a single family owner occupied home. The applicant must have occupied the dwelling for at least one year from the date of application. Nueces County Tax Records and utility records must indicate the residence is the applicant's primary residence. Property taxes must be current at the time of application. Applicant must be current on the mortgage. If the property is located in a flood plain, it will be ineligible for assistance through the rehabilitation program. Upon inspection by a Property Advisor, if the home is determined to be over 60% deteriorated, the applicant will be referred to the Demolition and Replacement Loan Program. To determine the income eligibility of the household, the applicant will be provide the following: > Current government issued ID for all household members > Copy of social security card for all household members > 1 month of bank statements > Verification of all household income for the past 3 months VETERANS MINOR HOME PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY The applicant's gross annual income must meet the HUD Income Limits for Very Low Income households. There is no age restriction for the Veterans Minor Home Program. The applicant must not have ownership in any other property at the time of application. The applicant's property must reside within the city limits of Corpus Christi, be a single family owner occupied home. The applicant must have occupied the dwelling for at least one year from the date of application. Nueces County Tax Records and utility records must indicate the residence is the veteran's primary residence. Property taxes and mortgage be current at the time of application. If the property is located in a flood plain, it will be ineligible for assistance through the rehabilitation program. Upon inspection by a Property Advisor, if the home is determined to be over 50% deteriorated, the applicant will be referred to the Demolition and Replacement Loan Program. To determine the income eligibility of the household, the applicant will be provide the following: > Current government issued ID for all household members 4 > Copy of social security card for all household members > DD 214 OR Veterans ID Card > 1 month of bank statements > Verification of all household income for the past 3 months LEAD BASED PAINT REQUIREMENTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW All homes built prior to 1978 will be subjected to HUD guidelines regarding Lead Base Paint inspection to identify and addresses lead hazards. Projects where the level of rehabilitation assistance is between $5,000 and $25,000 will require a risk assessment that must be conducted by a qualified person prior to rehabilitation to find lead-based paint hazards in assisted units, in common areas that service those units, and on exterior surfaces. The risk assessment must include paint testing of any surfaces to be disturbed by the rehabilitation. If the home is receiving a roof replacement or roof repair only, a Lead Based Paint Test will not be required. MINOR HOME REPAIR GRANT and VETERANS MINOR HOME REPAIR GRANT PROGRAM INCOME LIMITS Very Low Income FAMILY SIZE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ANNUAL INCOME 20350 23250 26150 29050 31400 33700 36050 38350 Revised 6/6/2016* Income limits are established by HUD and are subject to change without notice SINGLE FAMILY REHAB GRANT PROGRAM The Single Family Rehab Grant Program is a grant up to $25,000 to assist low to moderate income households with repairs involving the following: Roof, Plumbing, Electrical, Heating, Foundation and Minor Structural Problems. SINGLE FAMILY REHAB GRANT PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY The applicant's gross annual income must meet the HUD Income Limits for Low to Moderate Income Households. There is no age restriction for the Single Family Rehab Grant Program. The applicant must reside within the city limits of Corpus Christi, and the property must be an owner occupied, single family residence. The applicant must have occupied the dwelling for at least one year from the date of application. Nueces County Tax Records and utility records must indicate the residence is the applicant's primary residence. Property taxes and mortgage must be current at the time of application. If the property is located in a flood plain, it will be ineligible for assistance through the rehabilitation program. Upon inspection by a Property Advisor, if the home is determined to be over 60% deteriorated, the applicant will be referred to the Demolition and Replacement Loan Program. To determine the income eligibility of the household, the applicant will be provide the following: > Current government issued ID for all household members > Copy of social security card for all household members > 1 month of bank statements > Verification of all household income for the past 3 months SINGLE FAMILY REHAB GRANT PROGRAM INCOME LIMITS Low to Moderate Income FAMILY SIZE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ANNUAL INCOME 32,550 37,200 41,850 46,500 50,250 53,950 57,700 61,400 Revised 6/6/2016* Income limits are established by HUD and are subject to change without notice DEMOLITION AND RECONSTRUCTION LOAN PROGRAM This program assists very low income and low to moderate income homeowners with the demolition and reconstruction of their homes. Upon inspection by a Property Advisor, the structure must be determined to be over 50% deteriorated, or if the cost to rehabilitate exceeds the value of the home, the house may be demolished. Grants will be provided to the homeowner to cover the costs to demolish the property and relocating the household while the home is being reconstructed. DEMOLITION AND RECONSTRUCTION LOAN PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY The applicant's gross annual income must meet the HUD income guidelines for very low or low to moderate income households. There is no age restriction for the Demolition and Reconstruction Loan Program. The applicant must reside within the city limits of Corpus Christi, and the property must be an owner occupied, single family residence. The applicant must have occupied the dwelling for at least one year from the date of application. Nueces County Tax Records and utility records must indicate the residence is the applicant's primary residence and must have title in their name. The applicant must have a favorable credit rating; no Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy of a primary mortgage within the past 3 years. If the property is located in a flood plain, it will be ineligible for assistance through the rehabilitation program. Upon inspection by a 6 Property Advisor, if the home is determined to be over 50% deteriorated, the applicant will be referred to the Demolition and Replacement Loan Program. Title opinions are obtained to evidence ownership of the property. The program offers minimum deferred loans, zero percent interest loans for very low income households and three percent interest loans for low to moderate income households. Demolition and Reconstruction loans must receive approval by the Program Manager and final approval by the Loan Review Committee. The after rehab value of the home cannot exceed $162,000. To determine the income and program eligibility of the household, the applicant provide the following: ➢ Current government issued ID for all household members • Copy of social security card for all household members ➢ 1 month of bank statements ➢ Verification of all household income for the past 3 months ➢ Deed of Trust ➢ Divorce Decree (if applicable) ➢ Power of Attorney (if applicable) ➢ Probated Will (if applicable) ➢ An identified Heir to the property Applicants that have a clouded title, or need to probate a will to declare ownership of a property, will be referred to the Texas Rio Grande Legal Aid at 3825 Agnes St. Corpus Christi, TX 78405, (361) 880-5420 or Toll Free (800) 840-3379. Housing and Community Development Demo Replacement Loan Terms: 2 Bedroom Home = up to $80,000 3 Bedroom Home= up to $95,000 4 Bedroom Home= up to $115,000 COST OF CONSTRUCTION (and allowable expenses) 2 BEDROOM- Demolition Loan Amount up to $80,000 LOAN 3% 0% Minimum Deferred Deferred Forgivable $80,000 Low to Moderate Income $45,000/ 25 YRS $10,000/ 15 YRS $25,000/ 25 YRS $80,000 Very low to low income $35,000/ 25 YRS $20,000/15 YRS $25,000/25 YRS $80,000 62 or older, or disabled $25,000/25 YRS $20,000/15 YRS $35,000/25 YRS 7 3 BEDROOM- Demolition Loan Amount up to $95,000 LOAN 3% 0% Minimum Deferred Deferred Forgivable $95,000 Low to Moderate Income $45,000/ 25 YRS $15,000/15 YRS $35,000/ 25 YRS $95,000 Very low to Low Income $45,000/ 25 YRS $15,000/ 15 YRS $35,000/25 YRS $95,000 62 or older, or Disabled $32,000/25 YRS $28,000/15 YRS $35,000/25 YRS 4 BEDROOM- Demolition Loan Amount up to $115,000 LOAN 3% 0% Minimum Deferred Deferred Forgivable $115,000 Low to Moderate Income $55,000/ 25 YRS $25,000/ 15 YRS $35,000/ 25 YRS $115,000 Very Low to Low Income $45,000/ 25 YRS $35,000/ 15 YRS $35,000/25 YRS $115,000 62 years or older, or disabled $40,000/25 YRS $35,000/15 YRS $40,000/25 YRS 8 REFINANCING MORTGAGES The Housing and Community Development (HCD) Department will refinance mortgages where an owner has defaulted on a payment arrangement, or is 120+ days past due. If the owner of the property has passed away, HCD Loan Processors will contact the heir to the property to refinance the remaining balance into their name to satisfy the loan. ➢ A monthly delinquency report will be provided to the Program Manager by Mortgage Servicing Department by the 5th of every month that identifies mortgages that are 120+ days late ➢ Program Manager will draft letter to be mailed out to delinquent applicants, requesting that the resident of the home come into HCD to make payment arrangement, if no response is received, assigned Loan Processors will initiate a follow up by letter and home visit ➢ If an heir to the property has been identified and is living at the property, we will reach out to the heir to refinance the home into their name ➢ A refinance for a low- moderate income household (at or above 50% AMFI) will receive a prevailing mortgage rate for refinancing the balance ➢ If the heir to the property must probate the will and has to address title issues, we will allow 6 months for the issues to be addressed. Low income applicants are referred to the Texas Rio Grande Legal Aid for title and probate assistance ➢ Depending on the loan amount to be refinanced, Housing and Community Development offers 5, 10 and 15 year terms to pay off the balance owed ➢ If an heir to the property is 62 years of age or older, or disabled, they will be eligible to receive a refinance of 0% ➢ If the heir to the property has no interest in residing in the property, or retaining ownership, we will request for the home to be sold. The remaining balance of the federal funds that are owed will be recaptured and paid back to HUD 9 HOMEBUYER PROGRAMS The City of Corpus Christi's Housing and Community Development (HCD) Department offers two assistance programs for low income homebuyers by providing deferred forgivable loans to be used for down payment assistance and closing cost assistance. Homebuyer Assistance Program Funding is available to qualified home buyers for the purpose of providing down payment assistance as a deferred loan to buy down the purchase price of an affordable home. The purchase price of a home cannot exceed 95% of the Metropolitan Statistical Area as determined by HUD, which is $162,000 for 2016. This program will provide up to $10,000 for an income approved household. The loan will be amortized over the specified affordability period, commencing on the closure date and forgiven at a rate of $2,000 per year for every year the homebuyer lives in the house. Should the homebuyer move out before the affordability period ends, then the remaining period will be prorated and must be paid back. Recapture provisions require the repayment of the total loan amount on a prorated basis. If the buyer sells the property within the affordability period, the balance of the amortized loan shall be due and payable. Housing Standards The home must pass a Housing Quality Standards (HQS) inspection, which is conducted by HCD staff. If the house was built prior to 1978, a lead based paint visual assessment will be required in accordance with HUD Lead Based Paint Regulations. Homebuyer Eligibility Prospective homebuyers shall meet the gross annual income limits adjusted for family size as determined by HUD. The Housing and Community Development Department will determine the applicant's anticipated annual gross income. Anticipated annual gross income is an estimation of future income a purchasing household expects to receive based upon their current future monthly income annualized over a 12 month period. Some examples of future income are bonuses, pay raises, commissions, or over -time. Homebuyers must attend a HUD approved Homebuyer/Homeownership class to obtain a Homebuyer Education Certificate. The certificate cannot be older than one year from the date of issue. If two or more persons are buying a home together, all must attend a class and provide a copy of the Homebuyer Education Certificate. HUD Approved Housing Counseling Agencies can be found here: http://www.hud1.gov/offices/hsg/sfh/hcc/hcs.cfm The purchasing household size will be determined by the Housing and Community Development Department using HUD's definition of purchasing household. Purchasing household includes all persons who will be occupying the units as their permanent residence. A member of a household is considered to a permanent member of the household if they have been living as a member of 10 the household for at least six months or more. Homebuyer's cash on hand cannot exceed program limits. Housing and Community Development will make a determination of eligibility at the time the mortgage lender submits the required documents listed in section (V. Lender Requirements) below. The homebuyer will be issued a Commitment Letter review and approval of all required submitted documents. The Commitment Letter will expire 6 months from the date of issuance. At the time of application, the homebuyer cannot have ownership in any property. The housing ratio ("front end ratio") must fall between 28%-32% The total debt ratio ("back end ratio") may not exceed 45% Income Requirements Low to Moderate Income FAMILY SIZE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ANNUAL INCOME 32,550 37,200 41,850 46,500 50,250 53,950 57,700 61,400 Revised 6/6/2016* Income limits are established by HUD and are subject to change without notice Lender Requirements The Lender will be required to submit the following to HCD: > Loan Estimate Form > Lender conditional loan approval > Signed and dated 1003 > Escrow Earnest Money Contract (sales price cannot exceed $162,000) > Three months of the most recent bank statements > Paycheck stubs for past 3 months > Government issued identification for all purchasing household members > Copy of social security card of all members of the household > Copy of the Homebuyer Education Certificate (no older than on year from date of issue) > Underwriter Summary (1008) — to be provided prior to HCD issuing the Commitment Letter > Title Commitment showing the 1st and 2nd Liens (upon final loan approval) > Closing Disclosure (upon final loan approval) 11 Title Company Requirements HCD will give the approval for closing and will wire funds to the Title Company. The Title Company will provide to HCD the original signed promissory note, the recorded City of Corpus Christi Deed of Trust, Recorded Warranty Deed, Final signed Closing Disclosure, Insurance Binder which shows all liens, and the Title Policy which shows HCD as a lien holder. The Title Company will be responsible for ensuring that all documents are complete and correct. Affordability Periods The residence must remain the primary residence of the homeowner. If the owner sells or moves out of the home during the affordability period, the City of Corpus Christi's recapture provisions will apply. Amount of Funds Less than $15,000 Required Affordability 5 Years HOME Program Recapture Requirements These requirements can be found in Appendix 3 $5,000 HOME Down Payment Program Funding is available to income and program qualified homebuyers for the purpose of providing closing cost assistance in the form of a deferred forgivable loan, up to $5,000. Homebuyers receiving funds from the Homebuyer Assistance Program can also apply to receive closing cost assistance. The $5,000 Home Down Payment Program will be amortized over the specified affordability period, commencing on the closure date and forgiven at a rate of $1,000 per year for every year the homebuyer resides in the home. Should the homebuyer move out before the affordability ends, then the remaining period will be prorated and must be repaid back. Recapture provisions require the repayment of the total loan amount on a prorated basis. If the buyer sells the home during the affordability period, the balance of the amortized loan shall be due and payable. During the intake process, the homebuyer will receive the HOME Recapture Provision. Assistance for the $5,000 HOME Program is based upon need. To determine the amount of assistance, a gap analysis will be conducted during the final approval process and once the closing disclosure is provided from the Title Company. 12 INFILL HOUSING INCENTIVE PROGRAM (IHIP) 1. Purpose The purpose of the Corpus Christi Infill Housing Incentive Program (IHIP) is to promote and encourage new home construction in existing CDBG neighborhoods on privately owned vacant lots and City owned vacant lots. This program applies to targeted areas where existing street and utility infrastructure is available to promote the development of single- family residential homes. The Housing & Community Development Department will administer the application process and determine eligibility of lots for the program. The Real Estate Division will administer the sale of land. The Development Services Department will ensure compliance with development requirements and track waived fees. 2. Benefits • Utilizes abandoned and/or nonconforming vacant property • Once established, properties are completely self-sufficient • Helps fulfill housing needs in an affordable price range • Revitalizes existing neighborhoods • Adds to the assessed value rolls, increasing future City property tax revenue • Improves maintenance of properties and potentially reduces crime • Reduces Code Enforcement abatement expense 3. Definitions "Infill lot" or "infill housing" is the insertion of additional housing units into an already approved subdivision or neighborhood. Specifically for this Infill Housing Incentive Program, this means the construction of new residential housing units built on site on a vacant lot or built on two non -conforming lots by re -platting through an administrative plat to remove the lot line, in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) designated areas within the City of Corpus Christi. 4. Eligibility Criteria For all vacant properties, private and city -owned: • Must be within the City's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) designated areas — see map below • Must meet the definition of infill lots • Must be in one of the following single family residential zones: o RS -15, RS -10, RS -6 and RS -4.5 (see Unified Development Code for definitions) • Must not be in an airport overflight zone or the Navy's Air Installations Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ), which includes the Accident Potential Zones (APZ) and Clear Zones 13 • Home construction must begin within 120 days of sale. • Home construction must be completed and receive Certificate of Occupancy within 6 months of construction start date. • Must meet all building standards and Unified Development Code requirements • Must result in a newly constructed, on site, single family home with finished floor plan of 900 to 1300 square feet o No mobile homes, no prebuilt homes moved onto the site • Will be subject to all permit requirements • Sales price or finished home value of $50,000 - $100,000 Additional criteria for City owned vacant properties: • Properties will be made available to builders through a competitive bid process with a defined minimum bid. • Builder must demonstrate experience to complete the project in a professional manner and to a standard appropriate for the community. • Builder must demonstrate financial capability. • Builder must enter into an agreement with City accepting all program requirements and City rules and regulations. • Builder must offer a limited builder's warranty to the homeowner acceptable to the City of Corpus Christi and compliant with State and Federal regulations. • Home construction must begin within 120 days of sale. • Home construction must be completed and receive Certificate of Occupancy within 6 months of construction start date. • Lot sale will be completed upon closing of the home sale. 5. Incentives • Waiver of City fees, which include building permit, platting and zoning fees. • Waiver of Water, Wastewater and Gas tap fees. • City will provide up to two roll -off containers at City's actual cost during construction 6. Sale of City owned Lots by Bid a. The selected City owned lots will be advertised and sold through a bid process with a minimum bid value. b. Bidders will be required to submit a $100 option contract for each lot for an option period not to exceed 120 days from the date of sale. c. Bidders may bid on one or more lots. d. Monies collected through the sale will be deposited in a Fund to be used to pay Development Services permitting fees and lot maintenance prior to sale, if any. e. Buyers will be required to start the construction on one lot before the end of the option period (120 calendar days) or the lot(s) will revert to the City for resale or for sale to the second highest bidder. f. Buyers can extend the option period with approval of the City Manager or his designee. 14 g. City will convey the lot through a subordination agreement. 7. Department Responsibilities a. Executive/Management is responsible to: 1) Establish program objectives and develop implementation procedures. 2) Report to City Council the results of the program on at least an annual basis. b. Housing and Community Development (HCD) Department Director is responsible to: 1) Manage the overall program to meet housing needs of the community. 2) Administer the Infill Housing Incentive Program and procedures, and present a briefing to the City Council at least annually. 3) Update website information about this program. 4) Work with Finance to establish a General Fund special fund with accounts to track revenues from sale of city owned lots and expenditures to pay Development Services the amount of waived fees. 5) Confirm applicant's eligibility for program, and work with Development Services to mark the permit as "Infill Housing" for appropriate permit review and waiver of fees. c. City Legal Department is responsible to: 1) Prepare and review all documents to ensure compliance with Local Government Code, City ordinances, and the City Charter. d. Real Estate Division of Engineering is responsible to: 1) Prepare bid documents for the sale of city owned lots individually or in packages, as appropriate. Multiple lots may be packaged based on appraised value and location. 2) Receive and open bids at a specified time and place. 3) Award bid based on best value and notify responsive bidders. 4) Prepare a subordination agreement for the lot to the builder for closing. 5) Set the minimum price of the lot in the bid. e. Development Services is responsible to: 1) Ensure waiver of all permit fees to include platting, building, and inspection fees. 2) Ensure waiver of all water, wastewater, and gas tap fees. All utilities will be installed at City expense. 8. Other Conditions a. This program will be monitored and assessed for viability and may be discontinued at the discretion of the City of Corpus Christi. b. The City will comply with the Tax Code Sec 34.051 Resale by taxing unit for the purpose of urban development. 15 VACANT LOT INFILL INCENTIVE PILOT PROGRAM 1. Purpose The purpose of the Corpus Christi Vacant Lot Infill Incentive Pilot Program is to create and strengthen community partnerships and encourage new home construction in existing neighborhoods on City owned vacant lots. This program applies to targeted areas where existing street and utility infrastructure is available to promote the development of single-family residential homes. The Housing & Community Development Department will administer the application process and determine eligibility of lots for the program. The Real Estate Division will administer the sale of land if applicable. The Development Services Department will ensure compliance with development requirements and track waived fees. The pilot program is designed to move city owned surplus properties to developers, public agencies and/or non-profit organizations for developing affordable housing and returning properties to tax rolls. 2. Benefits • Utilizes abandoned and/or nonconforming vacant property • Once established, properties are completely self-sufficient • Helps fulfill housing needs in an affordable price range • Revitalizes existing neighborhoods • Adds to the assessed value tax rolls, increasing future City property tax revenue • Improves maintenance of properties and potentially reduces crime • Reduces Code Enforcement mowing and abatement expense 3. Definitions "Infill lot" or "infill housing" is the insertion of additional housing units into an already developed subdivision or neighborhood. Specifically for this Vacant Lot Infill Incentive Program, this means the construction of new residential housing units built on site on a vacant lot or built on two non- conforming lots by re -platting through an administrative plat to remove the lot line, in designated areas within the City of Corpus Christi. City Lots — Surplus City Owned Residentially Zoned Lots 4. Eligibility Criteria For all vacant properties, city -owned: • Must meet the definition of infill lots • Must be in one of the following single family residential zones: o RS -15, RS -10, RS -6 and RS -4.5 (see Unified Development Code for definitions) • Must not be in an airport overflight zone or the Navy's Air Installations Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ), which includes the Accident Potential Zones (APZ) and Clear Zones 16 • Home construction must begin within 180 days of sale. • Home construction must be completed and receive Certificate of Occupancy within 12 months of construction start date. • Must meet all building standards and Unified Development Code requirements • Must result in a newly constructed, on site, single family home with finished floor plan of 700 to 1300 square feet o No mobile homes • Will be subject to all permit requirements • Sales price or finished home value is estimated to be from $75,000 - $125,000 Additional criteria for City owned vacant properties: • Properties will be made available to Developers, Public Agency and/or Non -Profits at no cost. • Entity must demonstrate experience to complete the project in a professional manner and to a standard appropriate for the community. • Entity must demonstrate financial capability. • Entity must enter into an agreement with City accepting all program requirements and City rules and regulations. • Entity must offer a limited builder's warranty to the homeowner acceptable to the City of Corpus Christi and compliant with State and Federal regulations. • Home construction must begin within 180 days of donation of land/lot • Home construction must be completed and receive Certificate of Occupancy within 12 months of construction start date. • Lot sale transfer will be completed and recorded upon closing of the home sale. 5. Incentives • Waiver of City fees, which include building permit, platting and zoning fees. • Waiver of Water, Wastewater and Gas tap fees. • City will provide up to two roll -off containers at City's actual cost during construction 6. Land a. The selected 12 City owned lots will be awarded to community based non-profit or public agencies. b. Entity may request one or more lots. c. Entity will be required to start the construction within 180 days d. Entity can extend the construction start period with approval of the City Manager or designee. e. City will convey the lot through a subordination agreement. f. Lots are to be returned to the Tax Rolls within 10 years of donation 7. Department Responsibilities a. Executive/Management is responsible to: 1) Establish program objectives and develop implementation procedures. 2) Report to City Council the results of the program on an annual basis. 17 b. Housing and Community Development (HCD) Department Director is responsible to: 1) Manage the overall program to meet housing needs of the community. 2) Administer the Vacant Lot Infill Incentive Program and procedures, and present a briefing to City Council annually. 3) Update website information about this program. 4) Work with Finance to establish a General Fund special fund with accounts to track revenues from sale of any city owned lots and expenditures to repay Development Services the amount of waived fees. 5) Confirm applicant's eligibility for program, and work with Development Services to mark the permit as "Infill Housing Pilot" for appropriate permit review and waiver of fees. c. City Legal Department is responsible to: 1) Prepare and review all documents to ensure compliance with Local Government Code, City ordinances, and the City Charter. d. Real Estate Division of Engineering is responsible to: 1) Receive and open requests for land at a specified time and place. 2) Notify responsive entities. 3) Prepare a subordination agreement for the lot to the entity for closing. e. Development Services is responsible to: 1) Ensure waiver of all permit fees to include platting, building, and inspection fees. 2) Ensure waiver of all water, wastewater, and gas tap fees. All utilities will be installed at City expense. 8. Other Conditions a. This program will be monitored and assessed for viability and may be discontinued at the discretion of the City of Corpus Christi. b. The City will comply with the Tax Code Sec 34.051 Resale by taxing unit for the purpose of urban development. 18 MONITORING The City is required by HUD to obtain information on rents and occupancy of HOME — assisted units to demonstrate compliance with the affordability rent requirements on an annual basis. Purpose: The Monitoring Policy provides guidance for Housing and Community Development (HCD) staff on conducting monitoring visits for the following Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funded programs: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) and HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME). Objectives: To ensure the HCD Office carries out its statutorily mandated responsibility to review grantee's performance in administering covered program pursuant to Section 104(e) and Section 119(g) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. a. Assists Recipients to improve their performance, develop greater self reliance and enhance their management and technical capacity; b. Assure that federal funds are being managed properly and are not being wasted or used for fraudulent purposes; c. Keep well-informed of the progress of funded projects respectively, for each Program. Responsibilities/Goals: a. HCD staff shall conduct a minimum of one (1) monitoring visit or be attentive if a revisit(s) are needed. HCD staff's goal should be to identify deficiencies and take corrective measures in order to improve and reinforce recipient's performance. As part of this process, HCD staff should be alert for fraud, waste, and/or mismanagement of federal funds and immediately address non- compliance issues. Management Plan: HCD Staff shall: a. establish an annual monitoring plan and will identify the actions that will be taken to assess recipient's performance, including the type/level of monitoring needed for each agency (e.g. limited, in-depth/on-site, desk review, etc.) and shall communicate and accommodate monitoring dates with recipients. b. maintain records of all monitoring visits and include supporting documents and reports. In the event HCD staff determines documents need not be placed in recipient's administrative file, a notation will be made to such file where supporting documents will be easily located as necessary. c. may conduct a desk review without conducting on-site monitoring at agency's location can be performed if: agency has been funded previous years and no findings were found and no unresolved concerns are pending. Risk Analysis a. HCD staff shall perform risk analysis for each of the funded projects to analyze and compare against the full spectrum of formula and competitive program participants and programs. This method ranks recipients in descending order, from highest to lowest risk. b. Three categories are generally used: high, medium and low risk. Monitoring visits shall be scheduled based on the results of the analysis perform and rank projects accordingly to be monitored in the first, second, third, or fourth quarter of funded year. c. Risk Analysis completed forms must be filed in the Recipient's administrative file. Pre -visit Preparations Checklist: Conducting a TA Visit: (a) review the recipient's administrative file, RFP application, subrecipient agreement (and amendments, if any) risk analysis, etc., (b) if construction related, notify respective HCD staff (by e-mail) that a monitoring visit is going to be scheduled and if there are any issues that need to be focused on during the monitoring visit. Make note of issues on the notice of monitoring (letter) to be sent to recipient. (c) before preparing notice for a TA, contact recipient for date/time availability and once verbally confirmed, send out written notice by regular or e-mail. A day before the TA visit, call to remind recipient. (d) upon arrival, greet recipient or representative, have a quick introduction and if necessary go over some of the areas noted on the TA letter. Briefly discuss basic documentation as to what needs needs to be on file and explain the importance of having "written" polices and procedures. A review tenant/client files (ask them to select about 3 files for your review) is recommended. Inform them that administrative and financial operating procedures should support their method of operations (ex: if a policy is in place, staff should be compiling with such, this may also include requirements included in tenant leases vs. recipient's operation procedures.) Provide them the opportunity to ask questions and feel at ease. 20 Conducting a Desk Review: (a) review the recipient's administrative file, RFP application, subrecipient agreement (and amendments, if any) risk analysis, etc., (b) if construction related, notify respective HCD staff (by e-mail) that an in-house desk review is going to be conducted and if there are any issues that need to be focused on du ring the desk review. (c) review financial file and visit with financial staff for any issues pending (d) notify recipient that an in-house desk review level monitoring will be conducted on such date and feedback will be provided to them. If there are any concerns, they will be noted on the Desk Review Monitoring Report and recommendations or action(s) needed to be taken by recipient will be identified OR if during the in-house desk review monitor determines a full on-site monitoring visit is needed, recipient will be notified. (e) In-house desk review report shall note which areas were reviewed and will note whether or not there are any concerns. Monitor will provide a signed copy of report to HCD Administrator A cover letter should be attached for HCD Administrators signature. NOTE: Desk Reviews monitoring method is only favorable for recipients whom have had years of successful program/project management. Desk reviews also allow HCD staff more staff time to conduct more intense monitoring visits for other recipients as needed. A desk review should be conducted only on an "every other year" basis and a full on-site monitoring visit should be conducted in between. a. In order to conduct a successful monitoring visit HCD staff shall perform a thorough desk review and be aware of any previous or current issues which need to be identified on the notice of monitoring visit and addressed at the time of conducting the monitoring visit. b. Completing the monitoring forms (see Monitoring Handbook) prior to sending out notice of monitoring visit which will indicate areas to be monitored, depending on the eligibility and national objective that needs to be met. c. All monitoring correspondence, completed forms, monitoring support documentation shall become part of the project administrative file. Conducting the On -Site Monitoring: Notification Letter • Send a formal notification letter no less than two weeks prior to the visit. Letter will contain the confirmed date and time of the visit along with the scope of the monitoring. Schedule a date and time convenient for the Subrecipient. • Provide the Recipient with a description of the information that will be reviewed during the visit. 21 • Specify the expected duration of the monitoring, which staff will be involved in the monitoring, what office space will be required, and what members of the Recipient's staff that the monitor will need to speak with. Entrance Conference/Interview • Upon arriving to the on-site monitoring visit, HCD staff will hold an entrance conference/interview with the Recipient's director and appropriate financial and program staff immediately before beginning the monitoring. • HCD staff will make sure that all Recipient's staff have clear understanding of the purpose, scope, and schedule of the monitoring from the very beginning. • Both City and Recipient must understand that it is the City's responsibility to monitor the Recipient's activities and determine whether its use of Program; funds is appropriate and meet HUD regulations. Documentation, Data Collection and Analysis • HCD staff shall use monitoring checklists provided in the CPD Grantee Monitoring Handbook (http://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/library/monitoring/handbook.cfm). HCD staff can use appropriate checklists that apply to the specific Recipient's activities. • HCD staff shall become familiar with the monitoring checklists and will document compliance, concerns, and/or findings; • HCD staff shall keep clear records of the steps that were followed and the information reviewed and obtain during the visit; Exit Conference/Interview • At the end of the monitoring visit, staff will meet again with key representatives of the surbrecipient organization to present the tentative conclusions from the monitoring visit. • The exit conference/interview should include the following objectives: o Present preliminary results of the monitoring visit; o Provide an opportunity for the Recipient to correct any misconceptions or misunderstandings on staff's part; o Secure additional information from the Recipient's staff to clearly or support their position; and o If there is indeed a concern or deficiency, provide the Recipient with an opportunity to report on steps they are already taking to correct the matter. • HCD staff will maintain notes on the exit conference in order to document what was discussed with the Recipient and whether the Recipient agreed with staff's tentative concerns and/or findings leaving a clear understanding of the areas of agreement and disagreement about staff's monitoring results. 22 Monitoring Letter Once the monitoring visit is concluded, HCD staff shall review all documentation and send a follow-up monitoring letter. The monitoring letter will be used to create a permanent written record of what staff found during the monitoring visit. Letters should emphasize the areas where the Recipient has done a good job and is in compliance or shown significant improvement as well as pointing out areas where corrective action or improvement is required. • Follow-up letters should identify fully every finding and concern. • If a finding of non-compliance is found, ensure that the finding is correctly identified based on an applicable law, regulation, or program policy, and support the facts presented in the monitoring letter. • For each finding, specify corrective actions the Recipient must take. • If a concern is identified where non-compliance may occur in the future because of weaknesses in the Recipient's operations, include specific recommendations for improvement. • Include deadlines in the monitoring letter for providing a written response to staffs monitoring letter that describes how the Recipient will resolve any findings and correcting each deficiency identified in the letter. • HCD staff shall mail the monitoring letter to the Recipient within 30 days after exit conference, especially if the letter details significant problems in the Recipient's operations. 23 COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS (CHDOs) Set Aside HUD requires that 15% of the HOME allocation each year be made available to Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDOs) for the development of affordable homebuyer or rental housing. Certification Organizations seeking CHDO status must document that the organization has capacity to own, develop, or sponsor housing each time it commits funds to the organization. HUD has established minimum criteria for eligibility as a CHDO and the City has developed the "Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) Policy, Procedure, and Standards" document to outline the process and requirements for CHDO certification. 24 Resolutions of Support for Housing Tax Credit Projects The City of Corpus Christi (the City) has formalized a process for developers requiring Resolutions of Support or No Objection for multi -family rental housing development projects seeking Housing Tax Credits (HTC) through the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs (TDHCA). Each year, the TDHCA is required to develop the Qualified Allocation Plan (QAP) to establish the procedures and requirements relating to the allocation of Housing Tax Credits. Once the QAP is submitted and approved by the Office of Governor, which occurs in December of each year, the adopted QAP will be published in the Texas Register. Typically, Resolutions of Support are required to be submitted to TDHCA during a specific timeframe. During the December 15, 2015 City Council Meeting, the Council approved the following list of amenities which would be required to be incorporated in a multi -family development in order to receive a Resolution of Support. The amenities were as follows: ✓ Full perimeter fencing ✓ Equipped functional computer learning center (2 computers per 20 units) ✓ Furnished community room ✓ Community laundry room ✓ Children's playscape area (where applicable) ✓ Appropriate Zoning During the FY2017-2018 Program Year, the City will also require the following in order to receive a Resolution of Support: ✓ Statement from Developer of meeting with the Council Member of the district of the proposed project to discuss the overall project. ✓ Meeting with the Housing and Community Development, Development Services, and Planning Departments to discuss the proposed project, site location, and project funding ✓ Appropriate size zoning During the FY2018-2019 Program Year and moving forward, the above will be required as well as site consideration from the City's Future Land Use Map below: 25 AInset 1 ces Bay Corpus Christi Bay c # • " 'IP sit gm, Wre • •• 0 Hay KID Future Lend Liss Map Mime use AgileslineeRsaal Enlarpgae MI Cagan weld Onsannanani - IMAM Mal Honey hriAtrIsl L. duty* Transparisilm Lao -Demi eg Residential Planned Dersinarkuni Matliari-Densly Residential Paisnansit Oimai Space H,Str.01.0,ty, FtSsaisst161 Flosel Plata ConsmetlOs Trsneitlen Aviation special Diranlet TranmIden Spmei Rly Lfrsi EXOSSAnganal I=1 Planning Oita. Chapman Ranch 111- Miles EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT PROGRAM The City of Corpus Christi receives an annual allocation from The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for the Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) Program. The City utilizes the funding for three (3) of the six (6) eligible activities. The funding is used for Administration of the ESG program and also two (2) additional activities which aide in housing in the ways of prevention and re-entry: Homelessness Prevention Housing relocation and stabilization services and short -and/or medium-term rental assistance as necessary to prevent the individual or family from moving to an emergency shelter, a place not meant for human habitation, or another place described in the homeless definition. The costs of homelessness prevention are only eligible to the extent that the assistance is necessary to help the program participant regain stability in their current housing or move into other permanent housing and achieve stability in that housing. Eligible costs include: • Rental Assistance: rental assistance and rental arrears • Financial assistance: rental application fees, security and utility deposits, utility payments, last month's rent, moving costs • Services: housing search and placement, housing stability case management, landlord -tenant mediation, tenant legal services, credit repair See 24 CFR 576.103. Rapid Re -Housing Housing relocation and stabilization services and/or short -and/or medium-term rental assistance as necessary to help individuals or families living in shelters or in places not meant for human habitation move as quickly as possible into permanent housing and achieve stability in that housing. Eligible costs include: • Rental Assistance: rental assistance and rental arrears • Financial Assistance: rental application fees, security and utility deposits, utility payments, last month's rent, moving costs • Services: housing search and placement, housing stability case management, landlord -tenant mediation, tenant legal services, credit repair See 24 CFR 576.104 27 APPENDICES Appendix 1: City of Corpus Christi Income Limits and Part 5 Requirements Page 29 Appendix 2: Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) Policy, Procedure and Standards Page 30 Appendix 3: HOME Program Recapture Requirements for Homebuyer Activities Appendix 4: Lead Based Paint Requirements Appendix 5: Environmental Review Policy and Procedures Appendix 6: Regulatory References Appendix 7: Maps 28 Page 32 Page 34 Page 37 Page 45 Page 47 APPENDIX 1 City of Corpus Christi Income Limits and Part 5 Requirements The City elected to utilize the 24 CFR Part 5 definition for determining annual income. The Part 5 definition of annual income is the gross amount of income of all adult household members that is anticipated to be received during the coming 12 month period. Annual income is used to determine eligibility and, in some programs, the level of assistance the household will receive. The City will use a household's expected ability to pay, rather than past earnings, when estimating housing assistance needs. Staff will utilize the Technical Guide for Determining Income and Allowances for the HOME Program as a resource and the standard to make a determinations on the following: > Whose Income to Count > Types of Income to Count > Treatment of Assets > What to include as an Asset > Income from Assets > Annual Income Inclusions and Exclusions > Calculating Part 5 Annual Income > Determining Household size > Comparing Household income to the HUD Limits > Income Certifications 2016 ADJUSTED HOME INCOME LIMITS for City of Corpus Christi Housing Programs Very Low Income: Minor Home Repair, Veterans Minor Home Repair Family Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Annual 20,350 23,250 26,150 29,050 31,400 33,700 36,050 38,350 Income Low & Moderate Income: Single Family Grant Rehab and Homebuyer Assistance Family Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Annual 32,550 37,200 41,850 46,500 50,250 53.950 57,700 61,400 Income Revised 6/6/2016 *Income limits are established by HUD 29 APPENDIX 2 Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) Policy and Standards 24 CFR 92 Community housing development organization means a private nonprofit organization that: (1) Is organized under State or local laws; (2) Has no part of its net earnings inuring to the benefit of any member, founder, contributor, or individual; (3) Is neither controlled by, nor under the direction of, individuals or entities seeking to derive profit or gain from the organization. A community housing development organization may be sponsored or created by a for-profit entity, but: (i) The for-profit entity may not be an entity whose primary purpose is the development or management of housing, such as a builder, developer, or real estate management firm. (ii) The for-profit entity may not have the right to appoint more than one-third of the membership of the organization's governing body. Board members appointed by the for- profit entity may not appoint the remaining two-thirds of the board members; (iii) The community housing development organization must be free to contract for goods and services from vendors of its own choosing; and (iv) The officers and employees of the for-profit entity may not be officers or employees of the community housing development organization. (4) Has a tax exemption ruling from the Internal Revenue Service under section 501(c)(3) or (4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 CFR 1.501(c)(3)-1 or 1.501(c)(4)-1)), is classified as a subordinate of a central organization non-profit under section 905 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or if the private nonprofit organization is an wholly owned entity that is disregarded as an entity separate from its owner for tax purposes (e.g., a single member limited liability company that is wholly owned by an organization that qualifies as tax-exempt), the owner organization has a tax exemption ruling from the Internal Revenue Service under section 501(c)(3) or (4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and meets the definition of "community housing development organization;" (5) Is not a governmental entity (including the participating jurisdiction, other jurisdiction, Indian tribe, public housing authority, Indian housing authority, housing finance agency, or redevelopment authority) and is not controlled by a governmental entity. An organization that is created by a governmental entity may qualify as a community housing development organization; however, the governmental entity may not have the right to appoint more than one-third of the membership of the organization's governing body and no more than one- third of the board members may be public officials or employees of governmental entity. Board members appointed by a governmental entity may not appoint the remaining two-thirds of the board members. The officers or employees of a governmental entity may not be officers or employees of a community housing development organization; (6) Has standards of financial accountability that conform to 24 CFR 84.21, "Standards for Financial Management Systems;" (7) Has among its purposes the provision of decent housing that is affordable to low-income and moderate-income persons, as evidenced in its charter, articles of incorporation, resolutions or by-laws; (8) Maintains accountability to low-income community residents by: (i) Maintaining at least one-third of its governing board's membership for residents of low- income neighborhoods, other low-income community residents, or elected representative of low-income neighborhood organizations. For urban areas, "community" may be a neighborhood or neighborhoods, city, county or metropolitan area; for rural areas, it may be a neighborhood or neighborhoods, town, village, county, or multi-county area (but not the entire State); and (ii) Providing a formal process for low-income program beneficiaries to advise the organization in its decisions regarding the design, siting, development, and management of affordable housing; (9) Has a demonstrated capacity for carrying out housing projects assisted with HOME funds. A designated organization undertaking development activities as a developer or sponsor must satisfy this requirement by having paid employees with housing development experience who will work on projects assisted with HOME funds. For its first year of funding as a community housing development organization, an organization may satisfy this requirement through a contract with a consultant who has housing development experience to train appropriate key staff of the organization. An organization that will own housing must demonstrate capacity to act as owner of a project and meet the requirements of §92.300(a) (2). A nonprofit organization does not meet the test of demonstrated capacity based on any person who is a volunteer or whose services are donated by another organization; and (10) Has a history of serving the community within which housing to be assisted with HOME funds is to be located. In general, an organization must be able to show one year of serving the community before HOME funds are reserved for the organization. However, a newly created organization formed by local churches, service organizations or neighborhood organizations may meet this requirement by demonstrating that its parent organization has at least a year of serving the community. 31 APPENDIX 3 HOME Program Recapture Requirements for Homebuyer Activities HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM RECAPTURE PROVISIONS The City of Corpus Christi, HOME Down Payment Assistance Program in compliance with 24 CFR 92.254 of the HOME rule, has adopted the following recapture policy, using the HUD acceptable recapture model, Reduction (or Forgiveness) During the Affordability Period. The HOME recapture provisions are established in §92.254(a)(5) and permit the original homebuyer to sell the property to any willing buyer within the affordability period, while the City of Corpus Christi is able to recapture all or a portion of the HOME assistance provided to the original homebuyer. The recapture approach requires that all or a portion of the direct subsidy provided to the homebuyer be recaptured from the net proceeds of the sale. Direct HOME Subsidy is the amount of HOME assistance, including any program income that enabled the homebuyer to buy the unit. It includes down payment, closing costs, interest subsidies, or other HOME assistance provided directly to the homebuyer. It also includes any assistance that reduced the purchase price from the fair market value to an affordable price. Furthermore, if HOME funds are used for the cost of developing a property and the unit is sold below fair market value, the difference between the fair market value and the purchase price is considered to be directly attributable to the HOME subsidy. Net Proceeds is the sales price minus the superior loan repayment (other than HOME funds) and any closing costs. The City of Corpus Christi may require full or partial repayment of the direct HOME subsidy when a subsequent sale occurs during the affordability period. If there are no proceeds or insufficient proceeds to recapture the full amount of HOME investment due, the amount subject to recapture must be limited to what is available from the net proceeds. The period of affordability is based upon the total amount of HOME funds subject to recapture, which is based on the amount of HOME assistance that enabled the homebuyer to purchase the home. This may include any HOME assistance that reduced the purchase price from fair market value to an affordable price, but excludes the amount between the cost of producing the unit and the market value of the property, such as the development subsidy. The recaptured funds must be used to carry out HOME eligible activities within the City of Corpus Christi. The period of affordability for the HOME Down Payment Assistance Program is five (5) years. As per HUD regulations, the period of affordability does not begin until the activity is shown as completed in HUD's Integrated Disbursement and Information System ("IDIS"). Therefore, the period of affordability may not start until sometime after the actual execution date of the Agreement and related Deed of Trust and Promissory Note. The period of affordability will however begin on the same date as the IDIS activity completion date. 32 The following table outlines the required minimum HOME affordability periods: HOME Investment Per Unit Minimum Period of Affordability Under $15,000 5 Years $15,000 to $40,000 10 Years Reduction (or Forgiveness) During the Affordability Period: The City of Corpus Christi has chosen to reduce the amount of direct HOME subsidy on a pro -rata basis for the time the homebuyer has owned and occupied the dwelling, measured against the required affordability for its HOME Down Payment Assistance Program. The HOME Down Payment Assistance Program will provide a program and income eligible homebuyer with up to $5,000 in HOME assistance. The pro rata amount to be recaptured will be determined by the following formula: # of years in the home x the total direct HOME subsidy = Recapture Amount period of affordability - The number of years the homebuyer occupied the home, divided by the period of affordability; - Multiply the resulting figure by the total amount of direct HOME subsidy originally provided to the homebuyer If there are insufficient net proceeds available to recapture the full amount pro rata amount due, then it is not required to repay the difference between the prorated direct HOME subsidy due and the amount the City of Corpus Christi is able to recapture from available net proceeds. Recapture Example: A homebuyer receives $5,000 of HOME down payment assistance to purchase a home. The total direct HOME subsidy to the homebuyer is $5,000 and requires a 5 year period of affordability. If the homebuyer sells the home in year 3 of the 5 year affordability period, the City of Corpus Christi would forgive 60 percent of the direct HOME subsidy and recapture 40 percent of the direct HOME subsidy, or $2,000 of the HOME investment, assuming that there are sufficient net proceeds available. In summary: The City of Corpus Christi will ensure that a detailed HOME Homebuyer Assistance Program Agreement and Notice of Period of Affordability Agreement that convey the recapture provisions is executed with the homebuyer to ensure that all parties are aware of the specific HOME requirements applicable to the home, such as the period of affordability, principal residency requirement, terms; and conditions of the recapture requirement. The HOME Homebuyer Assistance Program Agreement is a separate legal document that will comply with 24 CFR 92.254 of the HOME rule. As per accordance with the terms and provisions of the HOME Homebuyer Assistance Program Agreement, the City of Corpus Christi through the Notice of Period of Affordability Agreement will provide the homebuyer with the HUD IDIS activity completion date, which is equal to the beginning date of the Period of Affordability. 33 APPENDIX 4 Lead -Based Paint Requirements This portion of the manual outlines the requirements in relation to Lead -Based Paint. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development recently adopted new regulations in relation to the treatment of Lead Based Paint in properties built before 1978 that are assisted with HUD funding. The requirements are outlined below based on the activity undertaken. To obtain a copy of the rules from HUD, go to the HUD website at: www.hug.gov/lead and download the regulation. Down -payment Assistance Programs: The following are HUD's requirements See 24 CFR part 35 (subpart K): • Distribute Lead Hazard Information Pamphlet and Disclosure to buyers of homes built prior to 1978. • Perform Visual Assessment of all painted surfaces. • If Visual Assessment reveals deteriorated paint, action must be taken to stabilize each deteriorated paint surface. -At this point, the City will have to assume every component has lead since the Visual Assessment does not determine where lead is present. Safe work practices must be used by trained worker in this field. Paint stabilization works well on non -friction surfaces such as walls (interior/exterior). When dealing with friction points such as windows and doors, abatement procedures (removal, replacement, enclosure) are recommended. • After paint stabilization, clearance must be performed by a certified Risk Assessor or Lead Inspector. HUD has established lead levels that meet clearance requirements. • Notify the homebuyer within 15 days of results of clearance exam. At the Visual Assessment Stage, the homebuyer may opt for a lead test. This will reveal the levels of lead present in the home. A lead inspection will not tell you the risk involved, but only where the lead is located. This is when a buyer may request a Risk Assessment to outline the necessary Lead Hazard Reduction methods needed to insure a lead safe residence. Following are some options (NOT REQUIREMENTS) to consider in relation to your program design for down payment assistance programs: • If the visual assessment reveals defective paint in which stabilization and clearance is required then this cost can be funded by the nonprofit or the homebuyer or seller. • If visual assessment shows no deterioration of a painted surface, the homebuyer can sign a waiver stating that they are aware of the potential presence of lead paint and they choose not to address it. • A qualified consultant should advise on any lead inspection, lead hazard screen or risk assessments. 34 For Rehabilitation Programs (Owner -Occupied, Homebuyer, and Rental Property Rehabilitation Programs and Historic Preservation Residential Programs): See 24 CFR Part 35 (subpart J) If you are implementing a rehabilitation program, HUD's requirements are a bit more stringent in relation to lead based paint. The following describes HUD's requirements: For HUD funded rehabilitation activities, lead hazard evaluation and reduction activities must be carried out for all projects constructed before 1978. In all cases, notification must be made to the homeowner/buyer in the form of the HUD Lead Hazard Information Pamphlet and Disclosure or an acceptable alternative pamphlet. The required evaluation and reduction activity is dependent upon the amount of HUD funding used for the project. For cases where less than or equal to $5,000 will be spent on the rehabilitation: Testing: Paint Testing of surfaces to be disturbed by the rehabilitation activities must occur. Lead Hazard Reduction: Surfaces, which are disturbed during rehabilitation, must be re paired. Safe work practices must be used. After the rehabilitation activities are completed, clearance must be performed by a certified professional to ensure that units are safe. For cases where $5,001 to $25,000 will be spent on the rehabilitation: Testing: Paint testing of surfaces to be disturbed by rehabilitation must occur. In addition, a risk assessment must be performed. Lead Hazard Reduction: Interim controls must be used. This means that the friction and impact surfaces will be addressed. Interim controls include paint stabilization and cleaning. Safe work practices must be used. After the rehabilitation activities are completed, clearance must be performed by a certified professional to ensure that units are safe. For cases where more than $25,000 will be spent on the rehabilitation: Testing: Paint testing of surfaces to be disturbed by rehabilitation must occur. In addition, a risk assessment must be performed. Lead Hazard Reduction: abatement of hazards is the required approach. Abatement involves permanently removing lead based hazards, often through paint and component removal, replacement, encapsulation and enclosure. Interim controls and paint stabilization may be used on the home's exterior if it is not involved in the rehabilitation. Safe work practices must be used. After the lead hazard reduction activities are completed, clearance must be performed by a certified professional to ensure that units are safe. 35 Calculating the level of rehabilitation assistance: When calculating how much HUD funding will be used on a rehabilitation project, the following costs are counted: soft costs, administrative costs, relocation costs, environmental reviews, acquisition of property, and lead hazard evaluation and reduction costs. 36 APPENDIX 5 Environmental Review Policy and Procedures Environmental Review Record Procedures STEP 1: Determine the Level of Review The HCD Contract Administrator (CA) will review the program/project scope of work and determine at what level of environmental review needs to be conducted. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Classifications that will be determined are listed below: 1. Environmental Review for Activity/Project that is Exempt or Categorically Excluded Not Subject to Section 58.5 Pursuant to 24 CFR Part 58.34 (a) and 58.35 (b) Activities that by their very nature will have no physical impact upon the environment are exempt from NEPA requirements as well as Part 58.5. In these cases, the City does not need to check for compliance with the requirements or perform an environmental review, consultation, or other action under NEPA. Some examples from NEPA requirements include: • Environmental studies, plans & strategies • Information & financial services • Administrative & management expenses • Public services without physical changes • Inspections & testing properties • Purchase of insurance • Purchase of tools • Engineering or design costs • Technical assistance & training • Payment of principal and interest on HUD loans • Any of the CEST activities at §58.35(a) if Federal laws and authorities at §58.5 are not triggered Activities in this section that are categorically excluded from the requirements at 58.5, due to HUD's determination that such activities will not alter any conditions that would require a NEPA review or a compliance determination under 58.5. When performing a categorically excluded activity not subject to 58.5, the City does not need to publish a Notice of Intent/Request for Release of Funds (NOl/RROF). Following the award of program funds, no further approval from HUD will be needed with respect to environmental requirements. Examples of categorically excluded, not subject to NEPA requirements are: • Tenant -based rental assistance • Supportive services • Operating costs including maintenance, security, operation, utilities, 37 furnishings, equipment, supplies, staff training and recruitment and other incidental costs • Economic development activities not associated with construction or expansion of existing operations • Activities to assist homebuyers • Affordable housing pre -development costs • Supplemental assistance of previously -approved project 2. Categorically Excluded Subject to 58.5 Any of the categorically excluded activities in 58.35 are exempt from NEPA, provided that there are no circumstances that require compliance with any other federal law and authorities cited in 58.5. The City can designate an activity as Exempt after consulting with applicable agencies and organizations, and if it can show that none of the federal laws and authorities are triggered through funding this activity. The City must record compliance or conformance determinations for each statute, executive order, or regulation and provide credible, traceable, and supportive source documentation for each authority. Where applicable, the City must also complete the necessary reviews or consultations and obtain or note applicable permits or approvals. Additional documentation as appropriate must be attached to the environmental review record. Examples of categorically excluded, subject to NEPA requirements are: • Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction or rehabilitation of public facilities and improvements when: ■ Facilities and improvements are in place ■ No more than 20% change in size or capacity ■ No change in land use • Removal of architectural barriers that restrict accessibility • Rehabilitation of buildings and improvements: ■ Residential Structures of 1 —4 units: no more than 4 units; no change in land use; cannot increase into floodplain or wetland ■ Multifamily Residential Structures: unit density does not change more than 20%; no change in land use; cost of rehab is less than 75% of replacement cost after rehabilitation ■ Commercial, Industrial and Public Buildings: size and capacity does not increase by more than 20%; no change in land use • Individual action on up to four dwelling units (One 4 -unit structure or four 1- unit structures or any combination in between): • Individual action on a project of five or more housing units when sites are more than 2000 feet apart and no more than four units on any one site. • Acquisition, disposition or finance of existing structure or vacant land if retained for same use. • Combination of any of the above activities. 38 3. Subject to an Environmental Assessment (24 CFR 58.36) If a project is not exempt or categorically excluded under the above sections, the City must prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA). An EA is a concise public document that includes all the evidence and analysis supporting the City's decision as to whether an environmental impact statement is warranted or if an activity will result in no significant impact to the environment. Examples when environmental assessments are needed are: • New Construction (more than five (5) units); • Construction of Public Facilities; • Infrastructure Development; • New construction, demolition and/or reconstruction of five or more single family units on scattered sites that are less than 2,000 feet apart; • Extending the footprint of a single family unit into the floodplain or wetland area or expanding the footprint of a structure that is already in a floodplain or wetland area; • Major rehabilitation or reconstruction of multifamily residential units that increases or decreases the unit density more than 20 percent; • Conversion of a non-residential structure to create a residential use; • Acquisition of land for development of a housing subdivision; • Activities that are normally exempt or categorically excluded but have an extraordinary circumstance that requires further review. The City must file the completed checklist and a statement in the Environmental Review Record. 4. Subject to an environmental impact statement (24 CFR 58.37) If a project is subject to a full EA and is determined to have a potentially significant impact on the human environment, then an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is required. An EIS is also required if the project fits at least one of the following criteria: • It would provide a site or sites for or result in the construction of hospitals or nursing homes containing more than 2,500 or more beds; • It would remove, demolish, convert or substantially rehabilitate 2,500 or more existing housing units or would result in the construction or installation of 2,500 or more housing units; • It would provide enough additional water and sewer capacity to support 2,500 or more additional housing units. 39 STEP 2: Preparation of Environmental Review Once the level of environmental review is determined, HCD staff will include the determination in the Eligibility and Compliance Plan document. HCD staff will either prepare internally or designate the recipient to prepare environmental records. The estimated timeframe, depending on consultations require for completing Environmental Process is as follows: Environmental Determination Estimated Timeline for Preparation Exempt 1 Day Categorically Excluded not Subject to 58.5 1 Day Categorically Excluded Subject to 58.5 30-75 Days Environmental Assessment 45-100 Days Environmental Impact Statement 1-2 Years Tiered Environmental Review Environmental Reviews may be tiered to avoid repetition. Tiered reviews are used to identify and evaluate issues ripe for decision, excluding issues not relevant to the program, policy or project. They are appropriate when: • Evaluating a policy or proposal • Early Stages of Development • When site-specific analysis is not feasible and more narrowed and focused review is better done at a later date • Tiered environmental reviews are not appropriate for projects requiring an Environmental Assessment. The City will ensure tiered environmental reviews are prepared for single family housing programs at unspecified sites. This review is conducted to achieve both compliance and speed because it does not require upfront identification of assisted properties. In short, a tiered review focuses on a specific geographical area to address and analyze environmental impacts related to the proposed activities that might occur on the typical project site within that area. The specific addresses/locations of the individual properties are not known at this time. However, once individual project sites are located, any remaining environmental compliance issues that could not be resolved until project locations became known are completed according to standards for approval previously established for the target area. The City's tiered review focuses on scattered sites located throughout a particular targeted area unless the housing program is considered city-wide. 40 The Tier 1 addresses all laws and authorities possible and establishes a plan (narrative) for the site-specific or subsequent review. HCD must publish a public notice of intent to request a release of funds (NOl/RROF) and submit RROF as described in Step 3. The Tier 2 site-specific review does not require a public notice or RROF required unless there are unanticipated impacts or impacts that are not adequately addressed in the Tier 1 review. 8 -Step Decision Making Process for Projects in the Floodplain 1. Determine whether the action is located in a 100 -year floodplain (or a 500 -year floodplain for critical actions). 2. Notify the public for early review of the proposal and involve the affected and interested public in the decision making process. 3. Identify and evaluate practicable alternatives. Identify the project site selection criteria and consider several alternative sites and actions: A. Locate the project within the floodplain B. Consider modifying the project C. Obtain a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) or Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) or A. Locate the Project Outside of the Floodplain B. Consider other sites C. Consider no action or alternative actions that serve the same purpose 4. Identify Potential Direct and Indirect Impacts of Associated with Floodplain Development. 5. Where practicable, design or modify the proposed action to minimize the potential adverse impacts to lives, property, and natural values within the floodplain and to restore, and preserve the values of the floodplain. 6. Reevaluate the Alternatives. 7. Determination of No Practicable Alternative 8. Implement the Proposed Action 41 STEP 3: Publication of Notice of Intent (NOI) Request for Release of Funds (RROF) and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Categorical Exclusions HCD will publish a Notice of Intent to Request a Release of Funds (NOl/RROF) for projects that are Categorically Excluded Subject to §58.5 and projects requiring EAs, using the HUD recommended format. At a minimum, HCD staff shall publish the NOl/RROF notice in a newspaper of general circulation and on the City's HCD website. Additionally, the following shall be notified: 1. Individuals and groups known to be interested in the activities 2. Appropriate tribal, local, State and Federal agencies 3. Regional Offices of the environmental Protection Agency 4. HUD Field Office — Local HUD Representative Valicia Cisneros CPD Representative Department of Housing and Urban Development 615 East Houston Street, Suite 347 San Antonio, Texas 78205 CA must consider the comments and make modifications, if appropriate, in response to the comments, before it certifies and submits the RROF to HUD. The public comment period is 7 days when published, counting from the day after the publication. Environmental Assessments (EA) If the CA makes a Finding of No Significant Impact from an EA, it must prepare a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) notice, using the HUD recommended format. At a minimum, HCD staff shall publish the FONSI/NOl/RROF combined notice in a newspaper of general circulation and on the City's HCD website. Additionally, the following shall be notified: 1. Individuals and groups known to be interested in the activities 2. Appropriate tribal, local, State and Federal agencies 3. Regional Offices of the Environmental Protection Agency (Attachment IV) 4. HUD Field Office — Local HUD Representative Valicia Cisneros CPD Representative Department of Housing and Urban Development 615 East Houston Street, Suite 347 San Antonio, Texas 78205 42 The FONSI public comment period is 15 days when published, counting from the day after the publication. HCD typically publishes a FONSI notice at the same time it publishes the NOI/RROF. If the notices are released as a combined notice, the combined notice shall clearly indicate that it is intended to meet two separate procedural requirements; and, advise the public to specify in their comments which "notice" their comments address. The public comment period is 15 days when published, counting from the day after the publication. STEP 4: Preparation and Submission of the Request for Release of Funds (RROF) If no comments are received or once the comments are addressed, a HUD -7015.15 Request for Release of Funds (RROF) will be prepared by HCD staff and signed by the Housing and Community Development Director (Certifying Official). Once the signature is obtained, it will be submitted to the local HUD office. If comments are received HCD must consider the comments and make modifications, if appropriate, in response to the comments, before it completes its environmental certification and before the recipient submits its RROF. The RE cannot sign the RROF until the day after the public comment period closes. The form must be printed on both sides and the original copy must be submitted to HUD. The RROF cannot be altered in any way. In preparing a RROF, HCD must ensure that all applicable sections are completed. This includes the following: • HUD program for which funds are being requested is included • The Name and Address of the RE • Name and Address of the Recipient if it is not the RE • Project description for which RE is requesting funds • Indication of whether an EIS was or was not required • Signature of the Certifying Officer • Copy of City Manager's letter delegating authority as Certifying Officer to the Housing and Community Development Director • Certification Date after expiration of public notice comment period • Signature of the authorized officer of the Recipient when the Recipient is not the RE • Date of signature of the Recipient after expiration of the public notice comment period • Attach a copy of the public notice • Attach a copy of the citizen comments and responses The receipt of which will begin the fifteen (15) day period for HUD to receive comments. The original RROF document and a copy of the publication will be mailed to the San Antonio HUD local office located at 615 East Houston Street, San Antonio, Texas 78205. After HUD's fifteen (15) day comment period and no comments were received, HUD will send the City an Authority to Use Grant Funds (form HUD -7015.16). At this point the City is authorized to commit and use federal funds to undertake the various projects. 43 STEP 5: After Approval of the Environmental Review Record 1. CA shall add (if applicable) all public notice affidavits, citizen comments and responses, RROF, and the Authority to Use Grant Funds (ATUGF) to the environmental review record. 2. CA shall notify the agency or city department of approved environmental record. 3. CA shall ensure all mitigation and environmental requirements are incorporated into any contractual agreements. STEP 6: Environmental Review Recordkeeping 1. CA shall ensure all Environmental Review Records are certified by the HCD Director (Certifying Officer). 2. CA shall ensure the Environmental Review Records remain accessible in the centralized located shared -access drive for availability. 44 APPENDIX 6 Regulatory References You may be interested in reading the actual regulations published by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for CDBG and HOME and the applicable federal requirements. A copy of the regulations may be obtained by the contracting the Office of Grants Monitoring and Administration or downloading the information from the HUD website at www.hud.gov. The regulations for CDBD are located at 24 CFR Part 570: Part 570 — Community Development Block Grants Subpart A — General Provisions Section Title 570.1 Purpose and Primary Objective 570.2 Removed 570.3 Definitions 570.4 Allocations of Funds 570.5 Waivers Subpart C — Eligible Activities Section Title 570.200 General Policies 570.201 Basic eligible activities 570.202 Eligible rehabilitation and preservation activities 570.203 Special economic development activities 570.204 Special activities by Community -Based Development Organizations (CBDO's) 570.205 Eligible planning, urban environmental design and policy -planning -management - capacity building activities 570.206 Program administration costs 570.207 Ineligible activities 570.208 Criteria for national objectives 570.209 Guidelines for evaluating and selecting economic development projects The regulations for HOME are located at 24 CFR Part 92: Home Investment Partnerships Program Section Title SUBPART A - GENERAL 92.1 Overview 92.2 Definitions 92.4 Waivers and Suspensions of Requirements for Disaster Areas 45 SUBPART B — ALLOCATIONS FORMULA 92.50 Formula Allocations 92.60 Allocation Amounts for Insular Areas 92.61 Program Description 92.62 Review of Program Description and Certifications 92.63 Amendments to Program Description 92.64 Applicability of Requirements to Insular Areas 92.65 Funding Sanctions 92.66 Reallocations SUBPART C — CONSORTIA; DESIGNATION AND REVOCATION OF DESIGNATION AS A PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION 92.101 Consortia 92.102 Participation Threshold Amount 92.103 Notification of Intent to Participate 92.104 Submission of a Consolidated Plan 92.105 Designation as a Participating Jurisdiction 92.106 Continuous Designation as a ParticipatingJurisdiction 92.107 Revocation of Designation as a ParticipatingJurisdiction SUBPART D — SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS 92.150 Submission Requirements SUBPART E — PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS 92.200 Private -Public Partnership 92.201 Distribution of Assistance 92.202 Site and Neighborhood Standards 92.203 Income Determinations 92.204 Applicability of Requirements to Entities that Receive a Reallocation of HOME Funds, other than Participating Jurisdictions 92.205 Eligible Activities: General 92.206 Eligible Project Costs 92.207 Eligible Administrative and Planning Costs 92.208 Eligible Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) Operating Expense and Capacity Building Costs 92.209 Tenant -Based Rental Assistance: Eligible Costs and Requirements 46 Affordable Housing Multifamily in Corpus Christi Iz "Arra • e• ne• r•1010111• anotmonela• Fes 4,11,1•••• VelmeonlInlele. -1.1•••• Yam Yoe • inorleonr 38\ /17 .03 \ "nee NI se lon• ana Lao Du. any Cooionn I • Ino.e. • , ••11.••• aa'ilaci 311.413.e.ae .11 1 -SIT Sownele 54ere • 1.101.3•411•16. Ian 0.0 3.1 Donnan Ee• • 3o Inlo.no 4. MO Nome., Rd Jim ono RA= lf11,11E• Gee ••le eno • Selo rend 'Name •••• lialreaxece •• don ela . 3o One ApaelorarrM1 3401 Penna. 1,, • oille• 1e3•11 lelone looelnem• 4,10 • ono enO, *ma arc alf..• •5311 •nolel.• !Id 3s -e EA re ,OXIA ellen UAW... Itoolo Oleln •••., Orelon•no itelnelo• 5.1.••••••• leeeo• 4.11••• .40n. n. s4 1.••,1 Fla sp•-e 11.19.4.9.4.•41 ••• • - • naom.ome• •611 Orn•renn n• Rd. 1,3 39 - ''44A'41 LI 4 -14 \ 16 4/ MEI i it ,7,ill dA. ,, A A , CC Housing Authority Section 8 Complexes ; MURDER NAME AI311.1133 0 11.11nrnary Mc* 1117 G is I ti h a 0. Carpo ii 01.120, TO 70411 1 Ga lents., e Gardens 1110 Aril I n Van. C.srpu$ T,rttiTX70l19 2 La Armada 1 1455 Southgate, Corpus Christi, TX 7841S 3 Leeward Houses 2100 Sa dlq, Corpus Ch rls ILI , 1X 71415 A La Anttida 111 1441 Tompkins, Corpus Christi, TX 71104 5 GeOrlai WIIIi .3 HMIS 2320 BOOM, COrpuS Chnitl, 12 70101 0 Pa akawa v 2604-A Hou a to.-,.. corvra Ch060, Ix 78115 7 Treinerasi Terra. 2022 Ire...way Lane, Corpus Christi,71 73412 3 Ncl .s.f no Plate 180 rd 110 Street, Corpus 0.0201.70 71403 9 (urban TOWP, , 01042 1455 [Urban Drive [...pus Cnrist., TX 73415 10 MC Xi un e Mena. 2342 lidk1s11e, CO,Put Chnsh, TX 72410 11 Alanil 3801 Violet Rd Corpus Christ., 75 70410 12 Sea Breeze Senior Lis,. ng 809 Derry DR we , Carpus Christi,. TX 78408 U Ha rupton Fun Apartments 1130 Won. d r1dge Rd. Corp us 01 n s II, IX 78414 a 13 Rudy Bentancourt, HCD Director Date E. Jay Ellington, Interim Asst. City Manager Date AGENDA MEMORANDUM for the City Council Meeting of January 24, 2017 DATE: January 19, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Julio Dimas CFM, Interim Director, Development Services Department JulioD@cctexas.com (361) 826-3276 Discovery: Carport Regulations STAFF PRESENTER(S): Name 1. Julio Dimas Title/Position Department Interim Director Development Services OUTSIDE PRESENTER(S): None BACKGROUND: The purpose of this item is to update the City Council about the regulations concerning the construction of carports. Within the community, we have a large number of carports that would be considered non- conforming, as they are located within the street yard (or commonly called the front yard). Most single-family residential subdivisions are developed with a minimum 20 -foot street yard. Historically, all structures have been prohibited from being constructed within the minimum -required street yard. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Presentation — Carport Regulations Carport Regulations Discovery City Council Presentation January 24, 2017 Discover, Discuss, Decide Carport Definition A roofed structure with three or more open sides used for vehicle shelter and parking. A carport may either be free standing or attached to the primary building. Carports in the City: Wood/Metal Carports in the City: Metal Typical Property layout (not acceptable) Street 25' 6" Cone ROW — Driveway Dedication Apron Property Line NAR -47'17"F 110.95' L 6' Side Setback 5' Walk 1 115' 1 6' Side Setback 588'47'17"W 110.99' Property Line Front Yard Setback 36.8' J 25'— /Property Line Typical Property layout (acceptable) Street 25' 6" Conc ROW — Driveway Dedication Apron Property Line N88'47'17"F 110.95' L 6' Side Setback Conc Drive 16' 28.16' 5Walk 6' Side Setback 115' n ,1 36.8' J 25'-` /Property Line 588'47'17"W 110.99' Property Line Front Yard Setback Carports in City • 72'1440 t.p., "••35*.4 T1\ MI Carports IMCarports - Found GIN Permit `-• • ,„•:y - '•,;•-:; • 10,000 per NCAD filter of property records • . •••••„.4,t,k • :Sx Why are we Here ? • Current zoning setback would not allow the typical carport locations • Large number of existing carports are in place with out permits and would not be allowed in most locations • There is a need for carports • Propose a change in the ordinance that allow carport through a predictable and specific process and criteria • Propose a "grandfather" method that would allow existing owners to keep their carports that meet safety criteria Issues: • Location on the property, structures are prohibited from being located within the front yard building setback or over easements. • Setback are in place to have a consistent look to the neighborhood. • Most typical carports do not meet windstorm criteria. • This is a critical safety issue. In recent high winds, we have had several reports of carports flying around and causing damage. Issues: Safety Permitting: • Approximately 250 permits have been issued since 1995 for carport structures (2.5% of the 10,000). Discussing points: New Carports • Zoning Board of Adjustment: Variance request, is extremely difficult to show that there is a hardship. • Zoning Board of Adjustment: Establish a Special Use Exemption process within the UDC. The findings to grant a SUE are not as stringent (Planning Commission Recommended) • Modify UDC to allow carports within the front yard setback. Discussion Points: Existing Carports • Existing non -conforming - Existing Owners could have a grace period of one to two years to come in and register/document their existing carports. • Pictures, drawings, etc. of existing location, size, etc. • Windstorm Certification from windstorm engineer Questions ?