Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet City Council - 06/13/2017
Corpus Christi 1201 Leopard Street - f' Corpus Christi,TX 78401 i forward.cctexas.com Meeting Agenda - Final City Council Tuesday,June 13,2017 11:30 AM Council Chambers Public Notice - - THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE PROHIBITED IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE WILL BE PROVIDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL AT APPROXIMATELY 12:00 P.M. CITIZEN COMMENTS WILL BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES. Please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Any electronic media (e.g. CD, DVD, flash drive)that the Public would like to use while they speak to the City Council MUST be submitted a minimum of 24 hours prior to the meeting. Please contact the Public Communications department at 361-826-3211 to coordinate. Si Usted desea dirigirse al Concilio y cree que su ingl6s es limitado, habra un interprete ingles-espanol en todas las juntas del Concilio para ayudarle. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or services are requested to contact the City Secretary's office(at 361-826-3105) at least 48 hours in advance so that appropriate arrangements can be made. A. Mayor Joe McComb to call the meeting to order. B. Invocation to be given by Pastor Rick Barrera, Cornerstone Church. C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States to be led by Keith Selman, Assistant City Manager. D. City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. E. Proclamations /Commendations 1. 17-0710 Proclamation declaring June 9-19, 2017, "152nd Anniversary of the Juneteenth Celebration, The Spirit of Emancipation Days". Proclamation declaring June 15-18, 2017, "88th League of United Latin American Citizens State Convention Week". Commendation for Amador Ysassi Duran - Vietnam War Veteran Earns High School Diploma at Age 70. Corpus Christi Page 1 Printed on 6/12/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final June 13,2017 F. CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS / UPDATE ON CITY OPERATIONS: a. OTHER G. MINUTES: 2. 17-0717 Regular Meeting of May 30, 2017 and Workshops of June 1, 2017 and June 6, 2017. Attachments: Minutes- May 30, 2017 Minutes-June 1, 2017.pdf Minutes -June 6, 2017.pdf H. BOARD &COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: 3. 17-0711 Airport Board Animal Care Advisory Committee Marina Advisory Committee Mechanical Plumbing Advisory Board Attachments: Airport Board.pdf Animal Care Advisory Committee.pdf Marina Advisory Committee.pdf Mechanical Plumbing Advisory Board.pdf I. EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION: For administrative convenience, certain of the agenda items are listed as motions, resolutions, or ordinances. If deemed appropriate, the City Council will use a different method of adoption from the one listed;may finally pass an ordinance by adopting it as an emergency measure rather than a two reading ordinance;or may modify the action specified. A motion to reconsider may be made at this meeting of a vote at the last regular, or a subsequent special meeting;such agendas are incorporated herein for reconsideration and action on any reconsidered item. J. PUBLIC COMMENT FROM THE AUDIENCE ON MATTERS NOT SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA WILL BE HEARD AT APPROXIMATELY 12:00 P.M. A recording is made of the meeting; therefore, please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. If you choose to speak during this public comment period regarding an item on the agenda, you may do so. You will not be allowed to speak again, however, when the Council is considering the item. Citizen comments are limited to three minutes. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Any electronic media (e.g. CD, DVD, flash drive) that the Public would like to use while they speak MUST be submitted a minimum of 24 hours prior to the Meeting. Please contact the Public Communications department at 361-826-3211 to coordinate. Corpus Christi Page 2 Printed on 6/12/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final June 13,2017 PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT PROHIBITS THE CITY COUNCIL FROM RESPONDING AND DISCUSSING YOUR COMMENTS AT LENGTH. THE LAW ONLY AUTHORIZES THEM TO DO THE FOLLOWING: 1. MAKE A STATEMENT OF FACTUAL INFORMATION. 2. RECITE AN EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO THE INQUIRY. 3. ADVISE THE CITIZEN THAT THIS SUBJECT WILL BE PLACED ON AN AGENDA AT A LATER DATE. PER CITY COUNCIL POLICY, NO COUNCIL MEMBER, STAFF PERSON, OR MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE SHALL BERATE, EMBARRASS, ACCUSE, OR SHOW ANY PERSONAL DISRESPECT FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE STAFF, COUNCIL MEMBERS, OR THE PUBLIC AT ANY COUNCIL MEETING. THIS POLICY IS NOT MEANT TO RESTRAIN A CITIZEN'S FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. K. CONSENT AGENDA: (ITEMS 4 - 9) NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: The following items are consent motions, resolutions, and ordinances of a routine or administrative nature. The Council has been furnished with background and support material on each item, and/or it has been discussed at a previous meeting. All items will be acted upon by one vote without being discussed separately unless requested by a Council Member or a citizen, in which event the item or items will immediately be withdrawn for individual consideration in its normal sequence after the items not requiring separate discussion have been acted upon. The remaining items will be adopted by one vote. 4. 17-0607 Purchase of Wavetronix Radar Detection Systems for Traffic Signal Systems (Council Priority -Streets) Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a purchase from Twincrest Technologies, of Fort Worth, Texas for six Wavetronix radar detection systems in accordance with the cooperative purchasing agreement with the Houston-Galveston Area Council for a total amount of$99,400.00 and funded by the Redlight Photo Fund. This item is a one-time purchase. Attachments: Agenda Memo-Wavetronix Radar Price Sheet-Wavetronix Radar 5. 17-0601 Supply Agreement for Saddle Service Taps for Waterlines Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a supply agreement with HD Supply Waterworks of Corpus Christi, Texas for the purchase of saddle service taps for waterlines in response to RFB 1069 based on the lowest, responsive, responsible bid for a total amount not to exceed $35,559.17, with an estimated expenditure of$11,853.00 in FY2016-2017 and funded by the Warehouse Stores Fund. The term of the agreement is for one year with an option to extend for up to two additional one-year periods, subject to the sole discretion of the City. Corpus Christi Page 3 Printed on 6/12/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final June 13,2017 Attachments: Agenda Memo-Saddle Service Taps for Waterlines Bid Tab-Saddle Service Taps for Waterlines Supply Agreement-Saddle Service Taps for Waterlines Form 1295-Saddle Service Taps for Waterlines 6. 17-0567 Service Agreement for Electrical Repair for Sunrise Beach, Rincon Pump Station and Wesley Seale Dam (Council Priority -Water) Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a service agreement with Advantage Electrical Contracting & Maintenance, Inc., of Corpus Christi, Texas for the Electrical Services for Sunrise Beach, Rincon Pump Station and Wesley Seale Dam in response to RFB 1056 based on the lowest, responsive, responsible bid for a total amount not to exceed $49,475 with an estimated expenditure of$16,492 in FY2016-2017 and funded by the Water Fund. The term of the agreement is for one year with an option to extend for up to two additional one-year periods, subject to the sole discretion of the City. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Electrical Services Bid Tabulation - Electrical Services Service Agreement Electrical Repair Services.pdf Form 1295-Electrical Services 7. 17-0643 Purchase of four Kubota RTV 900 Series for Parks and Recreation and Utilities Motion approving the purchase of four Kubota RTV 900 Series from Kubota Tractor Corporation, from Torrance, California, based on the cooperative purchasing agreement with Texas Local Government Purchasing Cooperative, dba BuyBoard for the total amount not to exceed $62,923.16. Funds are budgeted in FY2016-2017. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Kubota RTV 900 Price Sheet- Kubota RTV 900 Series 8. 17-0572 Amendment of Subscription Service Licenses for the Human Resources Department - Elearning Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an amendment for the continuation of subscription service licenses with OpenSesame, Inc., of Portland Oregon, based on a sole source for a total amount not-to-exceed $203,400 for the subscription service of three years. Funds are available in the Human Resources FY 2016-2017 budget for the first of three annual expenditures of$67,800. Attachments: Agenda Memo-OpenSesame Subscription Pricing Sheet-OpenSesame Subscription (ELearning) Amendment Renewal -OpenSesame Subscription Form 1295-OpenSesame, Inc. Corpus Christi Page 4 Printed on 6/12/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final June 13,2017 9. 17-0615 Second Reading Ordinance -Amending the Unified Development Code -Adding a Non-Voting Ex-Officio Navy Representative to the Planning Commission (1st Reading 5/30/17) Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code by adding a non-voting ex-officio Navy representative to the Planning Commission; providing for severance; providing for penalty; providing for publication; and effective date. Attachments: Agenda Memo-Navy Ex-Officio Ordinance-Navy Ex-Officio Presentation-Navy Ex-Officio L. RECESS FOR LUNCH The City Council will take a lunch break at approximately 1:30 p.m. M. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (ITEMS 10 - 11) 10. 17-0681 Public Hearing and First Reading Ordinance - Rezoning property located at 4540 Tribble Lane Case No. 0517-03 Magellan Terminal Holdings, LP.: A change of zoning from the "CG-1" General Commercial District to the "IH" Heavy Industrial District. The property is described as Webb Tract Port View 101.58 acres, located along the west side of Poth Lane, south of Tribble Lane, and north of Interstate 37. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (May 17, 2017): Approval of the change of zoning from the "CG-1" General Commercial District to the "IH" Heavy Industrial District. Ordinance: Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC'), upon application by Magellan Terminal Holdings, LP. ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to Webb Tract Port View 101.58 acres, from the "CG-1" General Commercial District to the "I H" Heavy Industrial District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. Attachments: Agenda Memo 0517-03 Magellan Terminal Holdings LP. Ordinance 0517-03 Magellan Terminal Holdings. LP. with Exhibit Aerial Maps 0517-03 Magellan Terminal Holdings, LP. Zoning Report 0517-03 Magellan Terminal Holdings LP.with Exhibit 11. 17-0682 Public Hearing and First Reading Ordinance - Rezoning property located at 2121 Rand Morgan Road Corpus Christi Page 5 Printed on 6/12/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final June 13,2017 Case No. 0517-04 MPM Development, LP: A change of zoning from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District to the "RS-4.5" Single-Family 4.5 District. The property is described as being a Roberts Tract 2.064 acres out of Lots 3, 6, 11, 14 and 15 also known as Tract 1 F, Roberts Tract 31.119 acres out of Lots 3, 6, and 11, and Roberts Tract 6.517 acres out of Lots 3, 6, 11, and 14, and Roberts Tract 4.391 acres out of Lots 3, 6, 11, 14 and 15 also known as Tract 1 F, located along the west side of Rand Morgan Road, south of Leopard Street, and north of Oregon Trail. Planninq Commission and Staff Recommendation (March 19, 2017): Approval of the change of zoning from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District to the "RS-4.5" Single-Family 4.5 District. Ordinance: Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), upon application by MPM Development, LP. ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to Roberts Tract 2.064 acres out of Lots 3, 6, 11, 14 and 15 also known as Tract 1 F, Roberts Tract 31.119 acres out of Lots 3, 6, and 11, and Roberts Tract 6.517 acres out of Lots 3, 6, 11, and 14, and Roberts Tract 4.391 acres out of Lots 3, 6, 11, 14 and 15 also known as Tract 1 F, from the "RS-6" Single-Family 6 District to the "RS-4.5" Single-Family 4.5 District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. Attachments: Agenda Memo 0317-07 Mohammed Motaghi Ordinance 0517-04 MPM Develoment, LP. with Exhibit Aerial Maps 0517-04 MPM Development LP. Zoning Report 0517-04 MPM Development LP.with Exhibits N. REGULAR AGENDA: (ITEMS 12 - 15) The following items are motions, resolutions and ordinances that will be considered and voted on individually. 12. 17-0634 Resolution supporting the Downtown Management District's application for Cultural District Designation (Council Priority - Economic Development) Resolution supporting the Downtown Management District's application for the designation of a Cultural District and authorizing the certification of a Cultural District to be named Downtown Corpus Christi Cultural District for at least ten (10) years. Attachments: Agenda Memo-Cultural District Application Resolution -DMD Cultural District Application Texas Cultural District Program Overview 13. 17-0650 Lease-Purchase One Peterbilt 320 Chassis with Roll-Off and Three Corpus Christi Page 6 Printed on 6/12/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final June 13,2017 Peterbilt 367 Transfer Tractors for Solid Waste Operations Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to lease-purchase one Peterbilt 320 chassis, with a roll-off and three Peterbilt 367 transfer tractors from Rush Truck Centers of Texas, L.P., of Houston, Texas, based on the cooperative purchasing agreement with Houston-Galveston Area Council, for a total amount not to exceed $799,455 of which $13,274 is budgeted in General Fund for FY2016-17. Remaining payments will be requested in future years during the normal budget process. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Peterbilt 320 with Roll-Off and three 367 Transfer Tractors Price Sheet- Peterbilt 320 with Roll-Off and three 367 Transfer Tractor Informal Staff Report 5/25/2017-Fleet Replacement Program 5.25.17 Informal Staff Report 6/2/2017-Ten Year Fleet Replacement Plan 14. 17-0024 Resolution approving the Wastewater Management Plan Resolution approving the City of Corpus Christi Wastewater Management Plan Final Report ("Final Report") regarding options for improvements to the City's wastewater treatment plants ("WWTPs") and adopting Option 1 as stated by City Council on May 23, 2017, which provides for maintaining all existing WWTPs, not relocating the Greenwood WWTP, and flood proofing Greenwood WWTP instead. Attachments: Agenda Memo Revised -WWTP Management Plan Resolution Revised -WWTP Management Plan 2017 Exhibit A-WW Management Plan 15. 17-0656 Approving an Extension to the Agreement with Valero Refining - Texas, L.P. for recycled water(Council Priority -Water) Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a Sixty-day Extension to the Agreement for Exclusive Reservation of Recycled Water with Valero Refining - Texas, L.P. (Valero) for 4 million gallons per day (mgd). Attachments: Agenda Memo- Extension to the Agreement with Valero Refining for recycled w 2013 Agreement-Agreement for Exclusive Reservation of Recycled Water with First Amendment- Extension to the Valero Reservation Agreement Second Amendment- Extension to the Agreement for Exclusive Rervation of Re 60 Day Extension Agreement with Valero Signed by Valero O. FIRST READING ORDINANCES: (ITEMS 16 -20) 16. 17-0684 First Reading Ordinance - Billish Park Agreement for construction of park improvements and ongoing park maintenance Corpus Christi Page 7 Printed on 6/12/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final June 13,2017 Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an Agreement with the Padre Isles Property Owners Association ("PIPOA") for the Lease, Construction of Improvements and Operation of Billish Park located at 15601 Gypsy Street, to allow construction of park improvements, with City funding not to exceed $400,000 and PIPOA funding not to exceed $200,000, and providing for ongoing park maintenance by PIPOA. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Billish Park Ordinance - Billish Park Billish Park Agreement 17. 17-0673 First Reading Ordinance -Approval of agreement and appropriating funds for developer for the construction of a water grid main extension line located at the southeast corner of Fred's Folly Drive and Yorktown Boulevard Ordinance authorizing City Manager or designee to execute a Water Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Construction and Reimbursement Agreement ("Agreement") with Oso Bend Development Company ("Developer"), for the construction of a water grid main extension line and appropriating $117,667.45 from the No. 4030 Water Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Trust Fund to reimburse the Developer in accordance with the Agreement. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Riverbend Subdivision Ordinance -Water Arterial Grid Main Agmt Riverbend Subdivision with agreemi Location Maps- Riverbend Subdivision 18. 17-0672 First Reading Ordinance -for the acquisition of real property rights by eminent domain for the Rodd Field Expansion Project (Bond 2014, Proposition 2) (Council Priority - Streets) An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (1) determining the public necessity and public use for the acquisition of Right-of-Way Easements, Temporary Construction Easements and fee simple property rights for a street improvement project known as the Rodd Field Road Expansion Project, generally from Saratoga Boulevard to Yorktown Boulevard (Bond 2014); (2) authorizing the City Manager or designee to negotiate and execute all documents necessary to acquire the property interests subject to availability of funds appropriated for such purposes; (3) authorizing the City Manager to institute condemnation by eminent domain proceedings to acquire easement and fee simple property interests in the properties within the project area depicted on the Project Location Map; (4) authorizing payment pursuant to an award by special commissioners; (5) authorizing acceptance and recording of appropriate legal instruments; and (6) approving condemnation for all units of property to be acquired by condemnation herein by a single record vote of the City Council. Corpus Christi Page 8 Printed on 6/12/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final June 13,2017 Attachments: Agenda Memo- Rodd Field Road Expansion Project Ordinance - Eminent Domain - Rodd Field Road Expansion Project Location Map Rodd Field Road Expansion Project Presentation Rodd Field Road Expansion Project 19. 17-0561 First Reading Ordinance -Adjusting Speed Zone on Ocean Drive from Sand Dollar Boulevard to North Gate of Air Station Corpus Christi Ordinance amending the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 53, Section 53-254 Schedule V, Increase of State Speed Limit in Certain Zones to update portions of Ocean Drive and increase the speed limit on Ocean Drive, from Sand Dollar Boulevard to Naval Air Station Corpus Christi North Gate; providing for severance; and providing for publication. Attachments: Agenda Memo-Ocean Drive Speed Limit Change.docx Ordinance -Ocean Drive speed limit REVISED.docx Location Map-Ocean Drive Speed Limit Change.pdf Presentation-Ocean Drive Speed Limit.pptx 20. 17-0683 First Reading Ordinance -Approval for the resale of 26 foreclosed properties Ordinance authorizing the resale of 26 properties for$96,850.00 which were foreclosed upon for failure to pay ad valorem taxes, of which the City shall receive $8,213.35 plus $15,790.35 for partial payment of City paving and demolition liens. Attachments: Agenda Memo- Property Tax Sale of 26 Properties Exhibit A-Property for Tax Resale June 2017 revised Exhibit B -Tax Resale Letter from Law Firm Ordinance -Tax Resale 060717 P. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: (ITEMS 21 - 23) The following items are for Council's informational purposes only. No action will be taken and no public comment will be solicited. 21. 17-0705 Purchase of Public Art for Fire Station 18 located at 6226 Ayers Street Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an agreement to purchase a work of art created in mosaic tile, by artist Jeremiah Heye, owner of Heye Mosaics LLC, in the amount of $22,000.00 for Fire Station #18 to fulfill the public art requirement of Public Art Ordinance No. 21435, Sec 2-109. (Bond 2008) Attachments: Agenda Memo- Fire Station No. 18 Art Work Artist Agreement- Fire Station 18 Corpus Christi Page 9 Printed on 6/12/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final June 13,2017 Exhibit A - Fire Station No. 18- Public Art Sec 2-109 Municipal Public Art Program 22. 17-0447 Construction Contract and Real Estate Contract for Creek View Drive extension (Bond 2014, Proposition 2)(Council Priority - Streets) Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Max Underground Construction, LLC. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$308,720.50 for the Creek View Drive Extension project for the base bid and to execute a land acquisition purchase agreement for$94,000 with William E. McKinzie, Jr. Family Limited Partnership, and closing costs of$3,000. (Bond 2014 Proposition 2) Attachments: Agenda Memo-Creek View Drive Project Budget-Creek View Drive.xlsx Location Map Creek View Drive.pdf Presentation Creek View Drive Extension.pptx Executed Real Estate Sales Contract McKinzie Letter of Recommendation -Creek View Drive Extension.pdf Form 1295-MAX Underground.pdf Form 1295 McKinzie Family Partnership 23. 17-0669 Construction Contract and Testing Agreement for Carroll Lane from Houston Street to McArdle Road (Bond 2014, Proposition 1) (Council Priority - Streets) Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Haas-Anderson Construction, Ltd. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$6,192,097.55 for Carroll Lane from Houston Street to McArdle Road for a total Base Bid plus Additive Alternate No. 1 and to execute a construction materials testing agreement with Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$59,515 for Carroll Lane from Houston Street to McArdle Road. (Bond 2014 Proposition 1) Attachments: Agenda Memo-Carroll Lane Project Budget Carroll Lane Location Map Carroll Lane Presentation Carroll Lane Testing Agreement Carroll Lane Form 1295 Haas Anderson Form 1295 Tolunay Wong Letter of Recommendation Carroll Lane Informal Staff Report 2-2-17 Asphalt Concrete Corpus Christi Page 10 Printed on 6/12/2017 City Council Meeting Agenda-Final June 13,2017 Q. BRIEFINGS: (NONE) Briefing information will be provided to the City Council during the Council meeting. Briefings are for Council information only. Council may give direction to the City Manager, but no other action will be taken and no public comment will be solicited. R. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE: This item is for Council's informational purposes only. Council may give direction to the City Manager, but no other action will be taken and no public comment will be solicited. S. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (ITEMS 24 -25) PUBLIC NOTICE is given that the City Council may elect to go into executive session at any time during the meeting in order to discuss any matters listed on the agenda, when authorized by the provisions of the Open Meeting Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, and that the City Council specifically expects to go into executive session on the following matters. If the Council elects to go into executive session regarding an agenda item, the section or sections of the Open Meetings Act authorizing the executive session will be publicly announced by the presiding officer. The City Council may deliberate and take action in open session on any issue that may be discussed in executive session. The description of an item in "Executive Sessions" constitutes the written interpretation by the City Attorney of Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code and his determination that said item may be legally discussed in Closed Meeting in compliance with Chapter 551 the Texas Government Code. 24. 17-0716 Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning claims and litigation including, but not limited to, the case of Graziella G. Mesa vs. City of Corpus Christi, Texas. 25. 17-0709 Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.074 (Personnel Matters) to discuss the appointment, employment, and duties of public officers or employees, including, but not limited to, members of the City Council. T. IDENTIFY COUNCIL FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Per Council Policies, an item may be added to the agenda by four members of the City Council. Council may give direction to the City Manager to add an item to a future agenda, but no other action will be taken, and no public comment solicited. U. ADJOURNMENT Corpus Christi Page 11 Printed on 611212017 Cornus Christi 1201 Leopard Street F' Corpus Christi,TX 78401 y cctexas.com Meeting Minutes City Council Tuesday, May 30,2017 11:30 AM Council Chambers Public Notice - - THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE PROHIBITED IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE WILL BE PROVIDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL AT APPROXIMATELY 12:00 P.M. CITIZEN COMMENTS WILL BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES. Please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Any electronic media (e.g. CD, DVD, flash drive) that the Public would like to use while they speak to the City Council MUST be submitted a minimum of 24 hours prior to the meeting. Please contact the Public Communications department at 361-826-3211 to coordinate. A. Mayor Joe McComb to call the meeting to order. Mayor Joe McComb called the meeting to order. B. Invocation to be given by Rabbi Ilan Emanuel, Congregation Beth Israel. Rabbi Ilan Emanuel gave the invocation. C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States to be led by Jason Palmore, Marching/Concert Band Member, Veterans Memorial High School Sophomore. Mr.Jason Palmore led the Pledge of Allegiance. D. City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta called the roll and verified that a quorum of the City Council and the required Charter Officers were present to conduct the meeting. Charter Officers: City Manager Margie C. Rose, City Attorney Miles K. Risley, City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta. Present: 7- Mayor Joe McComb,Council Member Rudy Garza,Council Member Paulette Guajardo,Council Member Michael Hunter,Council Member Ben Molina,Council Member Greg Smith, and Council Member Carolyn Vaughn Corpus Christi Page 1 Printed on 6/8/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes May 30,2017 Absent: 1 - Council Member Lucy Rubio E. Proclamations /Commendations: 1. Presentation of Laserfiche's 2017 Pioneer Award Mayor McComb recognized City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta who received the Laserfiche's 2017 Pioneer Award for groundbreaking efforts to streamline information management with Laserfiche. F. CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS / UPDATE ON CITY OPERATIONS: Mayor McComb referred to City Manager's Comments. City Manager Margie C. Rose reported on the following topics: 1) The Texas Water Development Board is sponsoring a financial assistance workshop in Corpus Christi on Tuesday,June 6,2017 at 9:00 a.m. in the City Council Chambers. The workshop will provide valuable information on water project needs. Registration is encouraged at can be done at www.twdb.tx.gov. 2) City Manager Rose recognized and congratulated new Assistant Fire Chief of Training Doug Matthijetz. 3) City Manager Rose recognized the following Fleet Department employees who recently completed compressed natural gas (CNG) maintenance training: Heavy Equipment Mechanic Jacob Garcia; Heavy Equipment Mechanic Mark Lovett; Heavy Equipment Mechanic Robert Castillo; and Senior Equipment Mechanic Dennis Bundy. a. OTHER State Representative Todd Hunter gave a brief overview of the 85th session of the Texas Legislature. G. MINUTES: 2. Regular Meeting of May 23, 2017, Special Meeting of May 18, 2017 and Workshop of May 18, 2017. Mayor McComb referred to approval of the minutes. Council Member Michael Hunter made a motion to approve the minutes,seconded by Council Member Garza and passed with an unanimous vote (Council Members Rubio and Smith -absent). H. BOARD &COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: (NONE) I. EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL ACTION: Corpus Christi Page 2 Printed on 6/8/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes May 30,2017 J. PUBLIC COMMENT FROM THE AUDIENCE ON MATTERS NOT SCHEDULED ON THE AGENDA WILL BE HEARD AT APPROXIMATELY 12:00 P.M. A recording is made of the meeting; therefore, please speak into the microphone located at the podium and state your name and address. If you choose to speak during this public comment period regarding an item on the agenda, you may do so. You will not be allowed to speak again, however, when the Council is considering the item. Citizen comments are limited to three minutes. If you have a petition or other information pertaining to your subject, please present it to the City Secretary. Any electronic media (e.g. CD, DVD, flash drive) that the Public would like to use while they speak MUST be submitted a minimum of 24 hours prior to the Meeting. Please contact the Public Communications department at 361-826-3211 to coordinate. Mayor McComb referred to comments from the public. Susie Luna Saldana, 4710 Hakel, spoke regarding the recent legislative changes related to transportation network companies and the possibility of Uber operating in Corpus Christi and the vacant at-large council member position.Abel Alonzo, 1701 Thames,spoke regarding the "I Believe in Me" Run/Walk event and thanked Council Member Guajardo, City Manager Rose, Police Chief Mike Markle, Program Manager Laura Gonzales, and various staff for helping to make the event a success. Neil McQueen,4213 Estate Drive, spoke regarding storm water quality and continuing to educate the public on storm water. K. CONSENT AGENDA: (ITEMS 3 - 16) Approval of the Consent Agenda Mayor McComb referred to the Consent Agenda. There were no comments from the public. A council member requested that Item 12 be pulled for individual consideration. City Secretary Huerta announced that Council Member Hunter would be abstaining on Item 7. A motion was made by Council Member Garza, seconded by Council Member Guajardo,to approve the Consent Agenda. The consent agenda items were passed and approved by one vote as follows: Aye: 7- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Molina, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Absent: 1 - Council Member Rubio Abstained: 0 3. Resolution approving application for the Automobile Burglary and Theft Prevention Authority (ABTPA) grant within the Police Department Resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to submit a grant application in the amount of$488,211 to the Automobile Burglary Theft Prevention Authority (ABTPA) to continue the motor vehicle theft enforcement grant within the Police Department for Year 17 with a City Corpus Christi Page 3 Printed on 6/8/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes May 30,2017 cash match of$710,217, in-kind match of$58,406, and program income match of$9,517 for a total project cost of$1,266,351 and authorizing the City Manager or the City Manager's designee to apply for, accept, reject, alter or terminate the grant. This Resolution was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 031157 4. Construction Contract for Naval Air Station Corpus Christi Truck Inspection Staging Area Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Mako Contracting of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$1,109,801.44 for Naval Air Station Corpus Christi Truck Inspection Staging Area for the total Base Bid plus Additive Alternate No. 1. This Motion was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: M2017-069 5. Supply Agreement for liquid aluminum sulfate for water treatment (Council Priority -Water) Motion approving a supply agreement with Chemtrade Chemicals US, LLC, of Parsippany, New Jersey for liquid aluminum sulfate for water treatment in accordance with RFB 1072, based on lowest responsive, responsible bid, for a total amount of$1,532,180.00 of which $510,727.00 is budgeted in the Water Funds for FY2016-17. This Motion was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: M2017-070 6. Service Agreement for Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Inspection and Cleaning of Large Diameter Wastewater Lines for Wastewater Department Motion approving a service agreement with CSI Consolidated, LLC dba Clean Serve, LLC, of Pearland, Texas for closed circuit televised inspection (CCTV) of large diameter wastewater lines in accordance with RFB 1004/194, based on lowest responsive, responsible bid, for a total amount of$536,553.75 of which $134,138.00 is budgeted in the Water Fund for FY2016-17. The term of this agreement is for one year with an option to extend for up to four additional one-year periods, subject to the sole discretion of the City. This Motion was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: M2017-071 Corpus Christi Page 4 Printed on 6/8/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes May 30,2017 8. Amendment No. 1 to the Recycling Services Contract with BFI Waste Services Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute the First Amendment to the Collection, Processing, and Marketing Residential Recycling Commodities contract with BFI Waste Services of Texas, LP, and ratifying the effective date of the amendment to be May 1, 2017. This Motion was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: M2017-072 9. Purchase of 12 inch steel pipe for Gollihar Street Improvement Project Motion approving the purchase of 12 inch steel pipe for the Gas Department from Texas Pipe & Supply Company, of Corpus Christi, Texas, in response to Request for Bid No. 1124 based on the lowest, responsive, responsible bid for a total amount not to exceed $106,954.00. This Motion was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: M2017-073 10. Service Agreement for Appraisal Services for Corpus Christi International Airport Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a service agreement with Aviation Management Consulting Group, Centennial, Colorado, for appraisal services for the Corpus Christi International Airport, in accordance with RFP No. 180, based on responsive and responsible proposal. The agreement will be for$140,000.00, and $30,000.00 will be funded in FY2016-2017. The term of the agreement is for five years, subject to the approval of the Contractor and the City Manager, or designee. This Motion was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: M2017-074 11. Resolution supporting the application for financial assistance from the Texas Water Development Board to refund the Choke Canyon debt obligation (Council Priority -Water) Resolution requesting financial assistance from the Texas Water Development Board for the refunding of City obligations incurred by the City under Federal Contract No. 6-07-01-X0675 by and among the City, the United States of America, and the Nueces River Authority; authorizing City staff and consultants to coordinate the submission of Corpus Christi Page 5 Printed on 6/8/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes May 30,2017 the application to the Texas Water Development Board for funding from its Water Development Fund; and other matters in connection therewith. This Resolution was passed on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 031158 13. Second Reading Ordinance -Amending City Code and Drought Contingency Plan (City Council Priority -Water) (1st Reading 5/23/17) Ordinance amending City Code of Ordinances, Sections 55-152 and 55-153, to revise Drought contingency Stage 1 and 2 triggers and Drought Management Practices; authorizing amendment to the Drought Contingency Plan approved by Ordinance No. 029846 and amended by Ordinance No. 030545 to reflect the changes to Sections 55-152 and 55-153; and providing for publication. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 031160 14. Second Reading Ordinance -Amending City Code to modify the Auto Wrecker Ordinance and appropriating funds related to said modifications (Tabled 4/25/17) (1st Reading 5/23/17) Ordinance amending Chapter 57, Article V "AUTOWRECKERS" of the Corpus Christi Code of Ordinances by adding an impound vehicle administrative fee of$20 per vehicle; appropriating $61,000 in General Fund No. 1020 for four full-time equivalent (FTE) personnel and software upgrades; changing the FY 2016-2017 Operating Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030965 by increasing revenue and expenditures in the General Fund No. 1020 by $61,000 each; and providing an effective date, for severance, and for publication. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 031161 15. Second Reading Ordinance - One-way traffic flow along Rancho Vista Boulevard, between Yorktown Boulevard and future extension of Oso Parkway (1st Reading 4/25/17) Ordinance amending the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 53, Section 53-250 Schedule I - One Way Streets and Alleys by changing designated portions of Rancho Vista Boulevard East and Rancho Vista Boulevard West from a two-way traffic pattern to a one-way traffic pattern; providing for severance; and providing for publication. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the consent agenda. Corpus Christi Page 6 Printed on 6/8/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes May 30,2017 Enactment No: 031162 16. Second Reading Ordinance -Amending City Code to Eliminate Utility Account Transfer Fee in Certain Circumstances (1st Reading 5/23/17) Ordinance amending Chapter 55, Section 55-22, of the Code of Ordinances to eliminate the assessment of an administrative utility account transfer fee when related to a relocation of the customer due to a government-funded project; and providing for severance, publication, and an effective date. This Ordinance was passed on second reading on the consent agenda. Enactment No: 031163 12. Second Reading Ordinance - Rezoning property located at 115 Waco Street (1st Reading 5/23/17) Case No. 0417-03 ERF Real Estate, Inc.: A change of zoning from the "IH" Heavy Industrial District to the "IL" Light Industrial District. The property is described as being Blucher Subdivision A, Lot 10, located on the northwest corner of Waco Street and Kinney Street. Staff Recommendation (April 19, 2017): Denial of the change of zoning from the "IH" Heavy Industrial District to the "IL" Light Industrial District, in lieu thereof, approval of"Cl" Intensive Commercial District. Planning Commission (April 19, 2017): Approval of the change in zoning from the "IH" Heavy Industrial District to the "IL" Light Industrial District. Ordinance: Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC'), upon application by ERF Real Estate, Inc. ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to Blucher Subdivision A, Lot 10, from the "IH" Heavy Industrial District to the "IL" Light Industrial District; amending Plan CC to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. Mayor McComb referred to Item 12, rezoning of property at 115 Waco. Interim Director of Development Services Julio Dimas and a council member discussed the policy discouraging rezoning from one industrial district to another and the unknown future uses of the property. Mayor McComb called for comments from the public. Les Daniels, 555 Carancuhua, requested an explanation on the ordinance language regarding the repealer clause and publication.Joe Benavides, 410 Atlantic, spoke in support of the rezoning. Corpus Christi Page 7 Printed on 6/8/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes May 30,2017 Council Member Garza made a motion to approve the ordinance,seconded by Council Member Smith. This Ordinance was passed on second reading and appoved with the following vote: Aye: 6- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Molina and Council Member Smith Nay: 1 - Council Member Vaughn Absent: 1 - Council Member Rubio Abstained: 0 Enactment No: 031159 7. Approving an Extension to the Agreement with Valero Refining - Texas, L.P. for recycled water(Council Priority -Water) Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a Sixty-day Extension to the Agreement for Exclusive Reservation of Recycled Water with Valero Refining - Texas, L.P. (Valero) for 4 million gallons per day (mgd). Mayor McComb referred to Item 7, approval of an extension to the agreement with Valero Refining -Texas, L.P. for recycled water. Council Member Hunter abstained on this item. Council members discussed the following topics: consideration to table this item until after a decision is made on the wastewater management plan,Agenda Item 20; consideration to table Agenda Item 20 until the entire council can be present to take a vote; and whether Valero Refining -Texas, L.P.will be impacted if this item is tabled. Council Member Garza made a motion to table this item until June 13, 2017, seconded by Council Member Guajardo. This Motion was tabled to the city council meeting of June 13,2017 by the following vote: Aye: 6- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Molina, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Absent: 1 - Council Member Rubio Abstained: 1 - Council Member Hunter M. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (ITEM 17) 17. Public Hearing and First Reading Ordinance -Amending the Unified Development Code and the Corpus Christi Code of Ordinances related to carports Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code related to carports by revising subsections 1.11.3 "Defined Terms," 3.12.1 "Applicability," 4.2.5.13 "Types of Yards," and 5.3.2 "Specific Accessory Corpus Christi Page 8 Printed on 6/8/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes May 30,2017 Uses and Structures;"; amending the Corpus Christi Code of Ordinances Chapter 14, Article XIII "Development Services Fees" subsection 14-1306 Special Fees and subsection 14-1361 Zoning Ordinace Fees; providing for severance; providing for penalties; providing for publication; and providing an effective date. Mayor McComb referred to Item 17. Interim Director of Development Services Julio Dimas stated that the purpose of this item is to amend the Unified Development Code and the City's Code of Ordinances to allow existing carports to remain in the front yard setback and create a process for new carport construction in the front yard setback. Mr. Dimas provided a brief overview of the background regarding carports and recommendations. Existing Carport recommendations include: removing the zoning requirement; requiring WPI-2 certification for state windstorm requirements; basic site plan and at least four(4) photographs of existing carport showing location on the property; and a one time $50 registration fee. New carport recommendations include: Board of Adjustment review and half-fee of$318;standard building permit; and standard windstorm certification process. Mayor McComb opened the public hearing. Ken Baker, 7421 Idle Hour, spoke regarding the City's possible liability for not enforcing codes regarding carports. Sandra Ramirez,4317 Brentwood,said she is in support of the ordinance because she is interested in getting a permit to install a new carport. Rudy Tejano Pena,4213 Clinton,spoke regarding enforcement of existing codes and educating citizens about non-conforming carports. Margareta Fratila, 3606 Tripoli, spoke regarding insurance for carports and in support of the ordinance. Mayor McComb closed the public hearing. Council members and staff discussed the following topics:the number of carports identified that are not in compliance with codes; enforcing codes related to carports;whether any carports have blown away due to heavy winds; examples of the average costs for a building permit for a single-car carport;self-registration by owners; consideration to move forward with code recommendations for new carports;educating the public about non-conforming carports; adjustments to the front setback; additional fees burdening citizens with existing carports;the existing ordinance regarding carports; citizens contacting Development Services for permits; grandfathering existing carports from WPI-2 certification for state windstorm requirements;the inability to waive state requirements;whether the City is liable for non-compliant carports; other coastal counties that have implemented codes regarding carports;state requirements for detached versus attached carports;the grace period recommended for existing carport owners; aesthetics and safety aspects of carports; and a future workshop to continue discussions on this item. Council Member Smith made a motion to table this item, seconded by Council Member Molina. This Ordinance was tabled by the following vote: Aye: 7- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Molina, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Absent: 1 - Council Member Rubio Abstained: 0 Corpus Christi Page 9 Printed on 6/8/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes May 30,2017 N. RECESS FOR CORPORATION MEETING: (ITEM 18) Mayor McComb recessed the regular Council meeting to hold a Special Corporation Meeting of the North Padre Island Development Corporation. 18. Special Corporation Meeting of the North Padre Island Development Corporation This Corporation Meeting was held. O. RECONVENE COUNCIL MEETING: Mayor McComb reconvened the regular Council meeting. P. REGULAR AGENDA: (ITEMS 19 -22) 19. Contract for Professional Services for Packery Channel Monitoring Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a contract for professional services with Texas A & M University - Corpus Christi (TAMU-CC) in the amount of$257,745 for Packery Channel Monitoring. Mayor McComb referred to Item 19.Assistant City Manager Keith Selman stated that the purpose of this item is to execute an agreement with Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi for Packery Channel Monitoring. There were no comments from the Council or the public. Council Member Vaughn made a motion to approve the motion,seconded by Council Member Garza. This Motion was passed and approved with the following vote: Aye: 7- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Molina, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Absent: 1 - Council Member Rubio Abstained: 0 Enactment No: M2017-075 20. Resolution approving the Wastewater Management Plan Resolution approving the City of Corpus Christi Wastewater Management Plan Final Report ("Final Report") regarding options for improvements to the City's wastewater treatment plants ("WWTPs") and adopting Option 1 as stated by City Council on May 23, 2017, Corpus Christi Page 10 Printed on 6/8/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes May 30,2017 which provides for maintaining all existing WWTPs, not relocating the Greenwood WWTP, and flood proofing Greenwood WWTP instead. This item was discussed during the discussion on Item 7. This Resolution was tabled to June 13,2017 by the following vote: Aye: 6- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Molina, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Absent: 2- Council Member Hunter and Council Member Rubio Abstained: 0 21. Resolution for the purchase and installation of PCR Thermocycler equipment for the Health Department Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to purchase QuantStudio Dx equipment and installation for the Health Department from Fisher Scientific Company LLC, of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, based on a sole source for a total amount not to exceed $184,253.50; and finding that the purchase of this QuantStudio Dx equipment and installation is necessary to preserve and protect the public health and safety of the City's residents. Mayor McComb referred to Item 21. Director of Public Health Annette Rodriguez stated that the purpose of this item is to purchase and install laboratory equipment in the amount of$184,253.50 for testing and responding to Zika, Ebola, and other high-consequence infectious diseases. There were no comments from the public. In response to a council member, Ms. Rodriguez stated that the service contract is included in the price. Council Member Garza made a motion to approve the resolution,seconded by Council Member Molina. This Resolution was passed and approved with the following vote: Aye: 7- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Molina, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Absent: 1 - Council Member Rubio Abstained: 0 Enactment No: 031164 22. Service Agreement for Dumpster Collection Services Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a service agreement with Mark Dunning Industries, Inc., of Dothan, Alabama for dumpster collection services, in accordance with Request for Bid No. 1013, based on the lowest, responsive, responsible bid for a total amount not to exceed $110,454.59, with an estimated expenditure of Corpus Christi Page 11 Printed on 6/8/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes May 30,2017 $42,581.31 in FY 2016-2017. The term of this contract will be for one year with options to extend for two additional one-year periods at the sole discretion of the City. Mayor McComb referred to Item 22. Director of Solid Waste Operations Lawrence Mikolajczyk stated that the purpose of this item is to execute a service agreement with Mark Dunning Industries for dumpster collection services for a total amount no to exceed$110,454.59,with an estimated expenditure of$42,581.31 in FY2016-2017. The term of this contract will be one year with the option to extend for two additional one-year periods. Assistant Director of Financial Services Kim Baker was available to respond to questions. Mayor McComb called for comments from the public. Bill Killian, 14590 Santa Gertrudis, requested consideration to award the contract to Killian Calderon Disposal and reject staff's recommendation and addressed the issues of local preference and business personal property taxes. Scott Smith, Mark Dunning Industries, spoke regarding the company's local presence and payment of City permits and requested consideration for City Council to support staff's recommendation on the lowest, responsive, responsible bidder. Matt Erkstrom, 1102 Access Lane,spoke regarding business owners' responsibility to remit business personal property taxes. Council members and staff discussed the following topics:the need to discuss local preference and the procurement process; award of the contract based on lowest, responsive, responsible bidder; concern with business personal property taxes; the option to exercise the renewal options; bidder requirements; and the bidder's price factored over the initial term of contract with the option to extend for two-additional one-year periods. Council Member Smith made a motion to amend the motion to award the contract for one year without the option to extend,seconded by Council Member Guajardo. The motion to amend was passed and approved with the following vote: Council Members Smith, Garza, Guajardo, and Hunter, voting "Aye"; Mayor McComb and Council Members Vaughn and Molina, voting "No"; Council Member Rubio-absent. Council Member Garza made a motion to approve the motion as amended, seconded Council Member Smith. This Motion was passed as amended and approved with the following vote: Aye: 7- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Molina, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Absent: 1 - Council Member Rubio Abstained: 0 Enactment No: M2017-076 L. RECESS FOR LUNCH Mayor McComb called for a brief recess at 1:32 p.m. Mayor McComb reconvened the Council meeting at 2:00 p.m. Corpus Christi Page 12 Printed on 6/8/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes May 30,2017 Q. FIRST READING ORDINANCES: (ITEM 23) 23. First Reading Ordinance -Amending the Unified Development Code -Adding a Non-Voting Ex-Officio Navy Representative to the Planning Commission Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code Section 2.3.2 Establishment, Membership and Procedure by adding a non-voting ex-officio Navy representative to the Planning Commission; providing for severance; providing for penalty; providing for publication; and effective date. Mayor McComb referred to Item 23.Assistant Director of Planning and ESI Daniel McGinn stated that the purpose of this item is to amend the Unified Development Code by adding a non-voting ex-officio Navy representative to the Planning Commission. The Joint Land Use Study recommended the addition of the Navy representative to the Planning Commission to allow the Navy a more interactive role in platting and zoning cases. Ben Pollack, Planning Liaison for Naval Air Station Corpus Christi,was present. There were no comments from the Council or the public. Council Member Vaughn made a motion to approve the ordinance,seconded by Council Member Garza. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 7- Mayor McComb, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Molina, Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Absent: 1 - Council Member Rubio Abstained: 0 R. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: (ITEMS 24 - 30) Mayor McComb referred to Future Agenda Items. City Manager Margie C. Rose stated that staff had planned presentations on Items 25,29, and 30.A council member requested information on Item 28. 24. Purchase of Wavetronix Radar Detection Systems for Traffic Signal Systems (Council Priority - Streets) Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a purchase from Twincrest Technologies, of Fort Worth, Texas for six Wavetronix radar detection systems in accordance with the cooperative purchasing agreement with the Houston-Galveston Area Council for a total amount of$99,400.00 and funded by the Redlight Photo Fund. This item is a one-time purchase. This Motion was recommended to the consent agenda. Corpus Christi Page 13 Printed on 6/8/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes May 30,2017 25. Master Service Agreement for Evaluation, Prioritization and Design of Major Ditch Improvements (Capital Improvement Project) Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a Master Service Agreement (MSA) with Lockwood, Andrews and Newnam, Inc. (LAN) of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of$500,000 for evaluation, prioritization and design of Major Ditch Improvements. (Capital Improvement Project) This Motion was recommended to regular agenda. 26. Supply Agreement for Saddle Service Taps for Waterlines Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a supply agreement with HD Supply Waterworks of Corpus Christi, Texas for the purchase of saddle service taps for waterlines in response to RFB 1069 based on the lowest, responsive, responsible bid for a total amount not to exceed $35,559.17, with an estimated expenditure of $11,853.00 in FY2016-2017 and funded by the Warehouse Stores Fund. The term of the agreement is for one year with an option to extend for up to two additional one-year periods, subject to the sole discretion of the City. This Motion was recommended to the consent agenda. 27. Service Agreement for Electrical Repair for Sunrise Beach, Rincon Pump Station and Wesley Seale Dam (Council Priority - Water) Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a service agreement with Advantage Electrical Contracting & Maintenance, Inc., of Corpus Christi, Texas for the Electrical Services for Sunrise Beach, Rincon Pump Station and Wesley Seale Dam in response to RFB 1056 based on the lowest, responsive, responsible bid for a total amount not to exceed $49,475 with an estimated expenditure of $16,492 in FY2016-2017 and funded by the Water Fund. The term of the agreement is for one year with an option to extend for up to two additional one-year periods, subject to the sole discretion the City. This Motion was recommended to the consent agenda. 28. Purchase of four Kubota RTV 900 Series for Parks and Recreation and Utilities Motion approving the purchase of four Kubota RTV 900 Series from Kubota Tractor Corporation, from Torrance, California, based on the cooperative purchasing agreement with Texas Local Government Corpus Christi Page 14 Printed on 6/8/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes May 30,2017 Purchasing Cooperative, dba BuyBoard for the total amount not to exceed $62,923.16. Funds are budgeted in FY2016-2017. This Motion was recommended to the consent agenda. 29. Lease-Purchase One Peterbilt 320 Chassis with Roll-Off and Three Peterbilt 367 Transfer Tractors for Solid Waste Operations Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to lease-purchase one Peterbilt 320 chassis, with a roll-off and three Peterbilt 367 transfer tractors from Rush Truck Centers of Texas, L.P., of Houston, Texas, based on the cooperative purchasing agreement with Houston-Galveston Area Council, for a total amount not to exceed $799,455 of which $13,274 is budgeted in General Fund for FY2016-17. Remaining payments will be requested in future years during the normal budget process. This Motion was recommended to the regular agenda. 30. Amendment of Subscription Service Licenses for the Human Resources Department - Elearning Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an amendment for the continuation of subscription service licenses with OpenSesame, Inc., of Portland Oregon, based on a sole source for a total amount not-to-exceed $203,400 for the subscription service of three years. Funds are available in the Human Resources FY 2016-2017 budget for the first of three annual expenditures of $67,800. This Motion was recommended to the consent agenda. S. BRIEFINGS: (ITEM 31) 31. Stormwater Quality Mayor McComb referred to Item 31. Interim Assistant Director of Wastewater Treatment Temple Williamson stated that the purpose of this item is to provide an update on storm water management quality practices. Mr. Williamson presented the following information:existing practices;the study area; a map with areas of high concentration of floatable sources;the types of devices used for upstream, midstream, and downstream;floatable strategy; local of catch basin inserts; examples of catch basin inserts; and how residents can help the City with storm water quality efforts. Council members and staff discussed the following topics: residents assistance with storm water efforts; protection inlets; use of catch baskets at the outfalls to the bay;funding from the RESTORE Act; concern with outfaill; communication effos; and engaging television stations to educate the citizens. Corpus Christi Page 15 Printed on 6/8/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes May 30,2017 T. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE: Mayor McComb referred to Legislative Update. Director of Intergovernmental Relations Tom Tagliabue provided a brief update on the 85th Texas Legislative Session including: Senate Bill 277. Military Base Protection; Defense Economic Adjustment Assistance Program(DEAGG); seller's disclosure notice; not having limitations on annexation to prevent encroachments; local governments ending the session with no revenue caps, no changes to annexation, no changes to eminent domain, no bond election restrictions, no changes to school start dates, and no preemption of local ordinances on short-term rentals, payday lending, red light cameras, license plate readers, and plastic bags;the immigration enforcement bill;transportation network companies rideshare bill; and small cell nodes. U. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (ITEMS 32 - 33) Mayor McComb referred to the day's executive sessions. The Council went into executive session at 3:13 p.m. The Council returned from executive session at 4:14 p.m. 32. Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to potential economic development agreement(s) with entities that are considering the construction, expansion, and/or ownership of industrial facilities in the City's territorial limits and extraterritorial jurisdiction and pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.087 to discuss confidential commercial or financial information pertaining to business prospect(s) that the City seeks to have locate, stay or expand in or near the territory of the City and with which the City may conduct economic development negotiations and/or deliberate possible economic development issues concerning said business prospect(s). This E-Session Item was discussed in executive session. 33. Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.071 and Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05 to consult with attorneys concerning legal issues related to the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property rights at or in the vicinity of Rodd Field Road & Yorktown Boulevard or legal actions related thereto and pursuant to Texas Government Code § 551.072 to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property (including, but not limited to, property rights at or in the vicinity of Rodd Field Road & Yorktown Boulevard) because deliberation in an open meeting would have a detrimental effect on the position of the governmental body in negotiations with a third person. This E-Session Item was discussed in executive session. V. IDENTIFY COUNCIL FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Corpus Christi Page 16 Printed on 6/8/2017 City Council Meeting Minutes May 30,2017 None. W. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 4:14 p.m. Corpus Christi Page 17 Printed on 6/8/2017 CorCorpus Christi 1201 Leopard Street p Corpus Christi,TX 78401 r& cctexas.com Meeting Minutes City Council Workshop Session Thursday,June 1,2017 3:00 PM Basement Training Room 1201 Leopard Street Public Notice - - ITEMS ON THIS AGENDA ARE FOR COUNCIL'S INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. COUNCIL MAY GIVE DIRECTION TO THE CITY MANAGER, BUT NO OTHER ACTION WILL BE TAKEN AND NO PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE SOLICITED. THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE PROHIBITED IN THE TRAINING ROOM DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. A. Mayor Joe McComb to call the meeting to order. Mayor McComb called the meeting to order at 3:03 p.m. B. City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta called the roll and verified that a quorum of the City Council and the required Charter Officers were present to conduct the meeting. Charter Officers: City Manager Margie C. Rose, City Attorney Miles Risley, and City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta. Present 8- Mayor Joe McComb, Council Member Rudy Garza Jr., Council Member Paulette Guajardo, Council Member Michael Hunter, Council Member Ben Molina, Council Member Lucy Rubio, Council Member Greg Smith, and Council Member Carolyn Vaughn Note: Council Member Vaughn arrived at 3:12 p.m. C. BRIEFINGS TO CITY COUNCIL: Proposed Bond 2018 Mayor McComb referred to Item 1. City Manager Margie C. Rose provided opening remarks regarding Proposed Bond 2018 and provided information on the streets, by city council district, included in the proposed Proposition 1, totaling $52,450,000, excluding utility costs, and which will not require an increase in property taxes; and a summary of: Proposition 2 -Harbor Bridge Roadway Mitigation, Proposition 3 -Economic Development, Proposition 4- Corpus Christi Page 1 Printed on 6/8/2017 City Council Workshop Session Meeting Minutes June 1, 2017 Public Facilties; and Preliminary Feasibility Reports totaling $2 million. Council members and staff discussed the following topics: the City's total debt capacity;the percentage of debt capacity needed for the proposed propositions; drawing down reserves to fund projects;that, as proposed, Propositions 2, 3, and 4 include an increase in ad valorem taxes, without drawing down reserves; a 1:1 match is required for utility work in relation to street work;the additional cost of utility work for Proposition 1 resulting in an increase in utility rates; determining which street projects will require utility construction; inclusion of curb-and-gutter in street construction; how the proposed street projects were selected, including traffic counts and number of accidents; prioritization of street projects;Junior Beck Drive, including flooding issues, its Pavement Condition Index(PCI), traffic volume and number of traffic accidents;selecting the top 3 or 4 street projects in each city council district is what is proposed;the Bond Street Assessment Criteria Matrix;the City's legal obligations relating to Harbor Bridge Roadway Mitigation; construction on existing streets on North Beach; consideration to re-connect streets on North Beach once the new Harbor Bridge is completed; addressing sidewalk construction by schools in the Unified Development Code(UDC)as part of the building permitting process; the validity of PCI measurements; taking a new look at the matrix system used to rank the priority of street projects;the frequency with which bond projects are taken to the voters;the total annual cost of debt service;that additional debt capacity is created as existing debt is paid off;the positive affect of currently low interest rates;the purpose of past bond projects;the cost of Maintenence and Operations and Interest and Sinking; the City's total indebtedness;spending money where "people feel it"; that the street projects in the proposed Propositions include arterials and collectors - not residential streets; the importance of timely completing required street construction on North Beach in conjuction with the construction of the new Harbor Bridge; and deleting certain street projects and replacing them with North Beach/new Harbor Bridge-related street projects on North Beach. MOTION OF DIRECTION Council Member Smith made a motion directing the City Manager to present to the City Council, a$52 million bond proposal,which includes improvements on North Beach related to the new Harbor Bridge,seconded by Council Member Guajardo. Council members and staff discussed the following topics: whether Proposition 1, as clarified in the above-stated motion of direction, was the only proposition that would be put before the voters; that current state statute requires three years to pass before a proposition that is put before the voters and fails, can be put before the voters again;that residents and business owners are "fed up"with street conditions; residents have communicated to council members that they are willing to pay higher taxes if it means getting streets repaired;which street projects could be removed from Proposition 1 to accommodate street projects that need to be completed in conjuction with construction of the new Harbor Bridge; proposing Propositions 2 and 3, detailing projects to be completed for a one-cent increase and another one-cent increase, respectively;the rideability of streets; providing an explanation to city council detailing what factors are included in calculating a PCI score; and future indexing of waste water,storm water and water infrastructure similar to the PCI used for streets. Corpus Christi Page 2 Printed on 6/8/2017 City Council Workshop Session Meeting Minutes June 1, 2017 RE-STATED MOTION OF DIRECTION Council Member Smith re-stated his motion of direction to the City Manager,to present to the City Council the following: Propostion 1 -a$52 million bond proposal,which includes improvements on North Beach related to the new Harbor Bridge; Proposition 2- projects to be funded by a one-cent increase in ad valorem taxes; and Proposition 3-projects to be funded by another one-cent increase in ad valorem taxes,seconded by Council Member Guajardo. Council members and staff discussed the following additional topics: the location of the new Harbor Bridge and connecting roadways; whether Propositions 2 and 3 are to consist solely of street projects; and ADA improvements. AMENDED MOTION OF DIRECTION Council Member Smith amended his previously re-stated motion of direction to the City Manager,to present to the City Council the following: Propostion 1 -a $52 million bond proposal,which includes improvements on North Beach related to the new Harbor Bridge and no increase in ad valorem taxes; Proposition 2-street projects to be funded by a one-cent increase in ad valorem taxes; and Proposition 3 -projects to be funded by another one-cent increase in ad valorem taxes, seconded by Council Member Guajardo, and passed unanimously. Council members and staff discussed the following additional topics: other projects to be funded through the City's capital improvement plan; and revisiting, in a workshop session, amending the UDC to address the construction and funding of sidewalks by schools. D. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 4:55 p.m. Corpus Christi Page 3 Printed on 6/8/2017 CorCorpus Christi 1201 Leopard Street p Corpus Christi,TX 78401 r& cctexas.com Meeting Minutes City Council Workshop Session Tuesday,June 6,2017 3:00 PM Basement Training Room 1201 Leopard Street THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AND SOUND ACTIVATED PAGERS ARE PROHIBITED IN THE TRAINING ROOM DURING MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. A. Mayor Joe McComb to call the meeting to order. Mayor McComb called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. B. City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta to call the roll of the required Charter Officers. City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta called the roll and verified that a quorum of the City Council and the required Charter Officers were present to conduct the meeting. Charter Officers: City Manager Margie C. Rose, City Attorney Miles Risley, and City Secretary Rebecca L. Huerta. Present 6- Mayor Joe McComb, Council Member Rudy Garza Jr., Council Member Paulette Guajardo, Council Member Michael Hunter, Council Member Lucy Rubio, and Council Member Greg Smith Absent 2- Council Member Ben Molina, and Council Member Carolyn Vaughn Note: Council Member Guajardo arrived at 3:01 p.m. C. BRIEFINGS TO CITY COUNCIL: 1. Preliminary Enterprise Funds Fiscal 2018 Budget and Preliminary Fiscal 2018 Capital Improvement Plan Mayor McComb referred to Item 1. City Manager Margie C. Rose provided opening remarks regarding Preliminary Enterprise Funds Fiscal 2018 Budget and Preliminary Fiscal 2018 Capital Improvement Plan. Management and Budget Director Eddie Houlihan presented information on the following topics: description and listing of Enterprise Funds; the number of full-time equivalencies in each Enterprise Fund;total Enterprise Funds revenues/expenditures for FY 2016-2017 and FY 2017-2018; health care costs associated with Enterprise Funds; projected change in fund balance for the following funds: Water,Wastewater, Storm Water, Gas,Airport, and Marina; Corpus Christi Page 1 Printed on 6/8/2017 City Council Workshop Session Meeting Minutes June 6, 2017 and Enterprise Funds'obligations and considerations for FY 2018. Council members and staff discussed the following topics: that monies to pay the Enterprise Funds'obligations and considerations for FY 2018 are funded by Enterprise Funds, not ad valorem taxes; restricted versus unrestricted fund balances; restrictions on using unrestricted balances between Enterprise Funds; uses/designations for monies in excess of restricted fund balances; health care costs funded from the Health Fund versus Enterprise Funds; how overages in health care costs are covered and reflected in Enterprise Fund budgets;water rate trends; and how demand for water impacts water rates. Assistant City Manager Mark Van Vleck presented information on the following topics: proposed Capital Improvement Budget and Plannning Guide;the current and FY 2018 Proposed Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)for the following: Airport, Parks and Recreation, Public Facilities, Public Health/Safety, Streets, Gas, Storm Water,Water Supply, Water, and Wastewater; and rate impacts. Council members and staff discussed the following topics: winter averaging; Airport improvements and how they differ from street improvements; progress on existing bond projects;timing of and planning/designing of roadway projects related to completion of the new Harbor Bridge, monies the City has for utility relocations, and completing preliminary design work for street projects related to the new Harbor Bridge; and that improvements to Beach Street on North Beach should be a top-tier project. D. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 4:18 p.m. Corpus Christi Page 2 Printed on 6/8/2017 City Of Corpus Christi AIRPORT BOARD BOARD DETAILS SeatsSIZE 10 The Airport Board advises the City Council concerning matters relating to the TERM LENGTH 3 Years aviation interests of the City of Corpus OVERVIEW TERM LIMIT 6 YearsChristi and the operation of the Corpus Christi International Airport facilities for the promotion of those interests. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. COMPOSITION Ten (10)members appointed by the City Council for three-year staggered terms. F-�'kCREATION/AUTHORITY Section 2 175, Code of Ordinances;Ord. Nos. 17012,4 28 82; 17748,7 27 83; DETAILS 19829, 7-07-87;20327,5-24-88;021661,5-25-93; 023755,8-31-99. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... MEETS 3rd Wednesday of every month,3:30 p.m., International Airport Board Room. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... TERM DETAILS Three-year staggered terms. .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. DEPARTMENT Aviation .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. COMMITTEE/SUBCOMMITEE AGENDAS OTHER INFORMATION AIRPORT BOARD Page 1 of 1 Airport Board Members June 13, 2017 The Airport Board is requesting the appointment of Donald M. Feferman as an Advisory, Non-Voting member. (The usual policy has been to appoint Advisory Non-Voting members to one-year terms.) Board Name .- Joseph Wise AIRPORT BOARD Active District 4 1 4/4/18 Chair Paul A. Cameron,Jr. AIRPORT BOARD Active District 4 Partial 4/4/18 Member Curtis Clark AIRPORT BOARD Active District 5 1 4/4/18 2nd Vice-Chair Alex Garcia,Jr. AIRPORT BOARD Active District 5 2 4/4/19 Member Mary Helen Dunnam AIRPORT BOARD Active District 4 2 4/4/19 Member Karl Tomlinson AIRPORT BOARD Active District 4 1 4/4/19 Member Luis F. Buentello AIRPORT BOARD Active District 5 1 4/4/20 Member Harold Kaffie,Jr. AIRPORT BOARD Active District 4 2 4/4/20 Member Jon Reily AIRPORT BOARD Active District 5 1 4/4/20 Member Robert Williams AIRPORT BOARD Active District 5 2 4/4/20 1st Vice-Chair Airport Board Applicant June 13,2017 Boards Applying For Work Address MR5 Donald M.Feferman AIRPORT BOART District 4 Attorney 615 N.Upper Broadway,Ste.650 Corpus Christi TX 361-883-1830 Advisory,Non-Voting Memo RECEIVED MAY 10 2017 jcnYS.ECRETARY'S OFRUEJ CORPUS CHRISTI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOARD To: Rebecca Huerta, City Secretary From: Jay Wise,Airport Board Chairman CC: Fred Segundo, Director of Aviation Date: May 3rd, 2017 Re: Airport Board Advisory Board Member Re-appointment As Chairman of the Corpus Christi International Airport Board, I would like to recommend that Don Feferman be appointed as an Advisory, non-voting Board Member for one year. Mr.Feferman has served on the Airport Board on two separate appointments. His first appointment was in 2004 where he completed two full terms. In reaching his term limit, he was then appointed as an Advisory, non-voting Board Member in 2010 for a term of one year. Upon completing his term as an Advisory Airport Board Member,he was appointed to the Airport Board in 2011 and served two full terms, which concluded this year. During this last reappointment term, Mr. Feferman served as Chairman. His experience as a voting member of the Airport Board is an asset and his input is invaluable. His assistance to the Board and staff will be a considerable resource in the future as the Airport continues growing with new phases of development and business opportunities. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns regarding my recommendation. Respectfully, "-le— Jay Wise, Chairman Corpus Christi International Airport Board APPLICATION FOR A CITY BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE Submit Date: Jan 07, 2015 Profile Donald M. Feferman Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? AIRPORT BOARD: Appointed -0 Street Address Suite or Apt State City i Postal Code What district do you live in? V District 4 Primary Phone Alternate Phone ATTORNEY AT LAW President Employer Job Title 615 N. UPPER BROADWAY, STE. 650 Work Address-Street Address and Suite Number CORPUS CHRISTI Work Address-City TX Work Address-State 78401 Work Address-Zip Code Donald M. Feferman Page 1 of 4 361-883-1830 Work Phone don@feferman.com Work E-mail address Preferred Mailing Address W Work Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: No Previously served on the Airport Board Previously served as an Advisory, Non-Voting Member Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) B.S. in Economics, The Wharton School of Finance, University of PA 1962 J.D. Harvard Law School 1965 Why are you interested in serving on a City board, commission or committee? Registered Voter? YesNo Current resident of the city? r Yes r No If yes,how many years? Donald M. Feferman Resume.pdf Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Donald M. Feferman Page 2 of 4 Demographics Ethnicity 9 Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Gender W Male Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. 9 1 Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. W I Agree Donald M. Feferman Page 3 of 4 Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. V I Agree Board-specific questions (if applicable) Donald M. Feferman Page 4 of 4 DONALD M. FEFERMAN ATTORNEY AT LAW DONALD M. FEFERMAN concentrates in the areas of securities arbitration,real estate,and business transactions. Mr. Feferman was admitted to the Texas bar in 1965. He received his undergraduate degree from the Wharton School of Finance at the University of Pennsylvania in 1962, and his law degree from Harvard Law School in 1965. Although he limits his practice to law, he is also a certified public accountant. His previous memberships and positions include: • Partner, Gary,Thomason,Hall &Marks, 1967-1988. • Partner,Feferman & Rehler, 1988-2001. • Legislative Committee of the American Resort and Residential Development Association. • Securities Registration Committee of the Texas Society of Certified Public Accountants. • Committee on Foreign Investment in U.S. Real Estate,American Bar Association. • Committee on Development of Existing Industries Task Force,Corpus Christi Area Economic Development Corporation. • Leadership Corpus Christi alumni. • Corpus Christi Citizens' Police Academy alumni. • President and Director,immediate past Chairman of Trust Committee,Temple Beth El. • Director and Vice President,Community Development Corporation. • Director and Treasurer,Jewish Community Council. • Member of original committee established in 1992 by Nueces County to assist in drafting and administering the regulations controlling beach access and dune permits, the Nueces County Beach Management Advisory Committee. Mr. Feferman is admitted to practice in Texas and Colorado. He is a member of the Texas, Nueces County,and Harris County Bar Associations as well as the Texas Society of Certified Public Accounts and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Mr. Feferman served as a captain in the U.S.Army and was awarded the Bronze Star for service in Vietnam during 1966 and 1967. Currently there are no board certifications offered In Mr.Feferman's areas of practice and,therefore,he is not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. City Of Corpus Christi ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE BOARD DETAILS SIZE 71F C. The Animal Care Advisory Committee advises the City Council and City TERM LENGTH 3 Years Manager on all aspects of animal control OVERVIEW TERM LIMIT 6 Yearsincluding fees, staffing, ordinances, procedures and policies and facilities. The jurisdiction and actions of the Committee shall be advisory only. _................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ COMPOSITION It shall consist of seven (7)members.Terms will be for three-years.At least one F-�'k member shall be a veterinarian.Two members shall be members of local animal welfare organizations(at least one of the organizations must operate an animal shelter).The remaining four members shall represent the community at-large.All members shall serve until their successors are appointed and qualified and each DETAILS shall be a resident of the City.The City Manager or his representative and the Animal Care Services Manager shall serve as ex-officio members of the Committee without vote.The Committee,by majority vote,shall elect its own Chairman who shall preside at all meetings of the Committee and a Vice- Chairman who shall act as president in the absence of the Chairman.The Animal Care Services Manager or his designated representative shall serve as the secretary of the Committee.The Animal Care Advisory Committee is designated as the Animal Shelter Committee required by the Health and Safety Code. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... CREATION/AUTHORITY Section 2-115, Code of Ordinances.Ord. Nos. 14214-2/22/78; 17573-4/20/83; 17748-7/27/83;20294-5/3/88;024461 -5/22/01; 030405- 1/20/15. _.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. MEETS 3rd Thursday of every month, 12:30 p.m.,Animal Care Facility Conference Room, 2626 Holly. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... TERM DETAILS Three-year terms. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. DEPARTMENT Corpus Christi Police Department _.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. COMMITTEE/SUBCOMMITEE N/A AGENDAS ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. OTHER INFORMATION ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Animal Care Advisory Committee Members June 13, 2017 One(1)vacancy with term to 5/3/19 representing the following category: 1-Community At-Large. M. Megan Tisdale ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Resigned District 4 1 05/31/19 Member Community At-Large Linda A.Gibeaut ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Active District 2 1 05/31/20 Member Community At-Large Samantha Person ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Active District 5 1 05/31/19 Vice-Chair Animal Welfare/Shelter Keera E.Seiger ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Active District 4 1 05/31/18 Member Community At-Large Sharon Ray ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Active District 5 1 05/31/20 Member Community At-Large Cheryl Martinez ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Active District 1 2 05/31/18 Chair Animal Welfare Dr.Sara Andux ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Active District 5 1 05/31/19 Member Veterinarian Animal Care Advisory Committee Applicants June 13,2017 Work Address ■® Melissa D.Bruton ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE District CCRV 80451H451H 37 Corpus Christi TX 361-289-5400 Community At-Large Karla K.Loften ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE District 1 TAMBC,Inc. 4418 Leopard St. Corpus Christi TX 361-882-4901 Community At-Large Margaret R.Obregon ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE District 2 Orion Health Services,Inc. 6025 Weber Road Corpus Christi TX 361-855-8189 Community At-Large Jake A.Trevino ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE District 1 Cc Area Oil Spill Control 1231 Navigation Blvd. Corpus Christi TX 361-438-6612 Community At-Large Carrie L.Withers ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE District 4 Corpus Christi Army Depot 308 Crecy Street Corpus Christi TX 361-961-5541 Community At-Large APPLICATION FOR A CITY BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE Submit Date: Nov 10, 2016 Profile Melissa D Bruton Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Submitted Street Address Suite or Apt State City i Postal Code What district do you live in? V District 4 Primary Phone Alternate Phone CCRV sales representative Employer Job Title 8045 IH 37 Work Address-Street Address and Suite Number Corpus Christi Work Address-City Texas Work Address-State 78409 Work Address-Zip Code Melissa D Bruton 361-289-5400 Work Phone melissa@ccrv.net Work E-mail address Preferred Mailing Address W Home/Primary Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: No Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) former zookeeper, volunteered at numerous animal care facilities, ran a pet sitting business, managerial experience Why are you interested in serving on a City board, commission or committee? Registered Voter? YesNo Current resident of the city? r. Yes No 3 If yes,how many years? Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Melissa D Bruton Demographics Ethnicity 9 Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Gender W Female Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. 9 1 Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. W I Agree Melissa D Bruton Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. V I Agree Board-specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? Melissa D Bruton APPLICATION FOR A CITY BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE Submit Date: May 23, 2017 Profile KARLA K LOFTEN Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Submitted sum Street Address Suite or Apt State City i Postal Code What district do you live in? V District 1 I= — Primary Phone Alternate Phone Tambc inc not collected Employer Job Title 4418 leopard st Work Address-Street Address and Suite Number Corpus Christi Work Address-City Texas Work Address-State 78408 Work Address-Zip Code KARLA K LOFTEN 3618824901 Work Phone Karlaloften@gmail.com Work E-mail address Preferred Mailing Address W Home/Primary Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: No Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) I am the contact for an organization called Paws Across America and a local animal advocate Why are you interested in serving on a City board, commission or committee? I feel I can bring ideas along with solutions that could possibly help our city's issues with strays and enforcement of violations Registered Voter? r Yes No Current resident of the city? r. Yes r No 12 If yes,how many years? Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents KARLA K LOFTEN Demographics Ethnicity 9 Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Gender W Female Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. 9 1 Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. W I Agree KARLA K LOFTEN Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. V I Agree Board-specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? W None of the above KARLA K LOFTEN APPLICATION FOR A CITY BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE Submit Date: Jun 02, 2017 Profile Margaret R. Obregon Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Submitted Street Address Suite or Apt State City i Postal Code What district do you live in? V District 2 qmmmmmm� lmvnnm� Primary Phone Alternate Phone Orion Health Services, Inc. Office Manager Employer Job Title 6025 Weber Road Work Address-Street Address and Suite Number Corpus Christi Work Address-City Texas Work Address-State 78413 Work Address-Zip Code Margaret R. Obregon 361-855-8189 Work Phone orionhhs_margaret@yahoo.com Work E-mail address Preferred Mailing Address W Home/Primary Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: No not at this time. I have served in the past on the Board of Gulf Coast Humane Society. I currently am a volunteer at CCACS since June, 2016. Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) HS grad with 3 years College. I have worked in Banking (20+ years); Retail Management (11 years) and Home Health Services (8 years) Why are you interested in serving on a City board, commission or committee? I am particularly interested in serving on this board due to the City stray problem. I feel action needs to be taken to educate the general public on all programs available for responsible pet ownership. I truly want to make a difference. Registered Voter? r Yes No Current resident of the city? Yes r No 37 years If yes,how many years? margaret_Obregon_Resume.doc Upload a Resume Margaret R. Obregon Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics 17 Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Gender W Female Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. W I Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. W I Agree Margaret R. Obregon Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. V I Agree Board-specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? W None of the above Margaret R. Obregon Margaret Obregon Work Experience: 2011 —Present Orion Health Services —Office Manager • Prepare all schedules for Nurses and Home Health Aides on a weekly basis. Set up all new patients, and update information on existing patients. Enter Oasis data required by Medicare including admissions, re-certifications, discharges, follow ups, resumption of care and transfers. Prepare documentation for referring physician's signatures including Plans of Care, and Telephone Orders. Record all nurses' notes, aide notes and therapy notes. Coordinate weekly case conference with nurses. Prepare documentation for payroll bi-weekly. Responsible for maintaining personnel documents, and updating personnel files as necessary with proper documentation, updating of annual training requirements, etc. Responsible for keeping up with all medical and office supply inventory, and ordering supplies as needed. Assist with Medicaid billing on PAS patients. Complaint reporting to all required agencies; DADS, DFPS as needed. Assist with billing as needed. 2010-2011 Orion Health Services —Quality Assurance • Reviewed all nurse documentation, comparing to client chart to ensure Plan of Care was being followed as required. Responsible for preparation of quarterly audits of a percentage of patient charts. Assisted with timely Medicare Billing. Ensuring that all documentation was present in patient's chart prior to billing. 2009-2010 Merci Bella Boutique—Manager/Buyer • Manager and Clothing Buyer for ladies boutique. Responsible for managing day to day operations of business and providing quality customer service. Traveled to market buying shows to purchase new merchandise for business. Responsible for receiving and tagging merchandise each season; then merchandising sales floor. Utilized marketing strategies for product turnover. Scheduled style shows and store parties to increase awareness of business and generate sales. Margaret Obregon Page Two 1998-2009 Julian Gold,Inc. — Store Director • Manager of upscale ladies specialty store. Responsible for managing daily operations of business working with corporate employees on a day to day basis. Reviewed sales daily in comparison to prior year figures, set goals for sales staff, and coordinated community events. Backed up Office Manager in daily balancing and preparation of sales reports. Merchandised sales floor and prepared display windows as needed. Coordinated and conducted inventory twice annually. Motivated sales staff daily to assist with sales efforts. Worked with customers daily to ensure sales satisfaction. Organized style shows to support community events and fundraisers. 1994-1998 Frost National Bank—Assistant Vice President • Mortgage Lender—Processed applications to assist clients with the purchase and refinance of homes. Prepared all documentation to send to underwriters. Marketing of loan products and services. Coordinated community events to promote home ownership opportunities. • Community Reinvestment Officer—Worked with community based organizations to market the Bank's products and services specifically designed for Low-Moderate income families. Retained documentation and implemented programs for lenders to utilize in the loan and account building process for Low-Moderate income families. Prepared for Federal Audits of Bank's compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act. 1981-1994 Texas Commerce Bank-Corpus Christi—Assistant Vice President • Compliance Officer—Ensured the Bank's compliance with all Federal Laws governing a National Bank. Conducted training on all Federal Laws and requirements to be followed to ensure compliance with all laws. • Loan Operations Officer—Managed Loan Operations Department ensuring all loan documentation was completed and in file relating to various types of loans. • Administrative Assistant to Chief Financial Officer- Assisted in applicant loan approval. Prepared all documentation for specific loan being applied for. Prepared reports and documentation for weekly Loan Officer Meeting, including requests for loan approvals greater than each Loan Officer's credit limit. • Loan Secretary—Prepared all loan documentation for customer signature. Prepared reports for weekly Loan Officer Meeting. Prepared all lender's correspondence. Assisted lender's clients with their lending needs, and referred them as needed to other banking services. Margaret Obregon Page Three 1983-1988 Waldenbooks—Assistant Manager • Managed evening operations of bookstore including stocking, ringing sales, preparation of balancing reports, and assisting customers with reading material. Community Support Involvement Community Development Corporation—City of Corpus Christi and various banking institutions First Friday Gulf Coast Humane Society, Board Member Corpus Christi Animal Care Services Volunteer Proficient in Kinnser Software—Home Health Program Education: 1975-1978 Texas A & I University—Kingsville Major: Secretarial Science 1971-1975 Raymondville High School High School Diploma Corpus Christi State University Continuing Education Courses (Finance) References: Mike Carrell, CEO Frost Bank-Corpus Christi JamesGlover, Director of Stores Julian Gold, Inc. Terry Castillo,Administrator Orion Health Services, Inc. APPLICATION FOR A CITY BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE Submit Date: Jun 20, 2016 Profile Jake A Trevino Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Submitted ARTS & CULTURAL COMMISSION: Submitted Street Address Suite or Apt State City Postal Code What district do you live in? V District 1 qmwnws� qmvmmm� Primary Phone Alternate Phone Cc area oil spill control Hazmat tech Employer Job Title 1231 navigation blvd Work Address-Street Address and Suite Number Corpus christi Work Address-City Texas Work Address-State 78403 Work Address-Zip Code Jake A Trevino 3614386612 Work Phone jakstax457@gmail.com Work E-mail address Preferred Mailing Address W Home/Primary Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Why are you interested in serving on a City board, commission or committee? Registered Voter? r° Yes r No Current resident of the city? Yes r No 25 If yes,how many years? Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Jake A Trevino Ethnicity W Hispanic Gender 9 Male Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. P I Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. fJ I Agree Jake A Trevino Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. V I Agree Board-specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? Question applies to ARTS&CULTURAL COMMISSION. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? W Public Art / Public Space Jake A Trevino APPLICATION FOR A CITY BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE Submit Date: Mar 14, 2017 Profile Carrie L Withers Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Submitted Street Address Suite or Apt State City i Postal Code What district do you live in? V District 4 INNNKN� lmvnnm� Primary Phone Alternate Phone Chief, Training and Employee Corpus Christi Army Depot Development Employer Job Title 308 Crecy Street Work Address-Street Address and Suite Number Corpus Christi Work Address-City Texas Work Address-State 78419 Work Address-Zip Code Carrie L Withers 361-961-5541 Work Phone carrie.l.withers.civ@a mai1.miI Work E-mail address Preferred Mailing Address W Home/Primary Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: I do not. Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Member Del Mar College Business Advisory Committee. Treasurer and lifetime member of US Army Association of America (AAAA). Member and former President of Federal Manager's Association (FMA) Chapter 125. Volunteer (since May 2016) with People Assisting Animal Control (PAAC). Why are you interested in serving on a City board, commission or committee? Registered Voter? Yes r No Current resident of the city? r. Yes No 26 If yes,how many years? Upload a Resume Lynn_Withers_Bio_for_City.docx Please upload any additional supporting documents Carrie L Withers Demographics Ethnicity 9 Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Gender W Female Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. 9 1 Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. W I Agree Carrie L Withers Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. V I Agree Board-specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to ANIMAL CARE ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? r Local Animal Welfare Organization f` Veterinarian r` Animal Shelter Operator F None of the above Carrie L Withers A native of Corpus Christi, Texas, Lynn began her career with the Department of Defense at Lowry Air Force Base in Denver, Colorado in 1987. After a four year tour in Heidelberg, Germany Lynn returned to Corpus Christi and began working at the Corpus Christi Army Depot in 1991 as an Administrative Assistant in the Total Quality Management and Organizational Design Office. During her career at CCAD she served in several capacities to include Total Army Quality Specialist and Instructor, Business Development Specialist, Depot Operations Officer Assistant, Administrative Officer, Maintenance Systems Analyst, and Supervisory Technical Training Advisor. In July 2006, Lynn was selected as the Chief, Skills & Development Division in the Directorate of Human Capital Management. Lynn holds a number of certifications including Registered Third-Party Quality Systems Auditor, Administrator of the Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator, Certified Facilitator for the Covey Leadership Institute, Certified Motivational Speaker for Zig Ziglar See You At The Top Program, and Accredited Off-Campus Instructor for the Army Management Engineering College. Currently she serves as the Army Activity Career Program 32 (Training, Capabilities and Doctrine Warfighting Developers) Manager. Lynn is involved in several organizations and volunteer efforts including the Federal Managers Association (Chapter 125 Trustee), Army Aviation Association of America (Lifetime Member), Operation Christmas Spirit (Committee Member), and People Assisting Animal Control (PARC). She is married to Blaine Withers and is a proud parent and step-parent to their blended family of five children, eight grandchildren and two great-grandchildren. Lynn and Blaine are animal advocates, with six rescue dogs of their own, they also contribute each year to various local animal charities and serve as fosters when called upon to do so. O 4 City Of Corpus Christi MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE BOARD DETAILS OVERVIEW SIZE 9 Seats TERM LENGTH 2 Years TERM LIMIT 6 Years The Marina Advisory Committee advises and makes recommendations regarding development, use, or preservation of the marina, including the following: (1) assist the City Council in providing for the orderly, planned development and use of the marina; (2) review the annual and capital improvement budgets regarding the improvement and maintenance of the facilities upon the marina; and (3) review and recommend to the City Council the feasibility of development, improvements, maintenance or proposed uses for the marina. DETAILS COMPOSITION Nine (9) members appointed by the City Council for two-year terms. The membership shall include one (1) Scientist, i.e. Marine Biologist, one (1) Engineer, and one (1) Environmentalist; one (1) shall be a Representative of a Restaurant located within the boundaries of the Corpus Christi Downtown Management District, and five (5) Community At -Large members. In the initial appointment, members will serve an initial two-year term, in the succeeding term, 5 members will serve a two-year term, and 4 members will serve a one-year term, as determined by drawing. Thereafter, all terms will be two -years. CREATION / AUTHORITY Section 2-260, Code of Ordinances; Ord. No. 027408, 9/11/07; Ord. No. 030604, 9/8/15. MEETS 1st Monday of every month at 5:30 p.m., People Street T -Head, Boater's Facility. TERM DETAILS Two-year staggered terms. DEPARTMENT Municipal Marina COMMITTEE/ SUBCOMMITEE AGENDAS OTHER INFORMATION MARINAADVISORY COMMITTEE Marina Advisory Committee Members June 13, 2017 Four (4) vacancies with terms to 12/18/18 representing the following categories: 2 - Community At -Large, 1 - Scientist, i.e. Marine Biologist and 1 - Representative of a Restaurant located within the boundaries of the Corpus Christi Downtown Management District. (Note: Staff is recommending the postponement of the Representative of a Restaurant located within the boundaries of the Corpus Christi Downtown Management District category for further recruitment.) District IIIEnd Date Sharon Emerson MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE Seeking reappointment District 2 2 12/18/16 Member Community At -Large 75% 6/8 meetings (2 exc.) Clare Lee MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE Seeking reappointment District 4 2 12/18/16 Vice -Chair Scientist 88% 7/8 meetings (1 exc.) Robert "Bob" Paulison MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE Seeking reappointment District 4 2 12/18/16 Member Community At -Large 88% 7/8 meetings (1 exc.) Greg Turman MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE Resigned District 5 1 12/18/16 Member Restaurant Representative Mona Baen MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE Active District 2 2 12/18/17 Member Community At -Large Curt Broomfield MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE Active District 4 3 12/18/17 Chair Community At -Large Hal Suter MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE Active District 2 2 12/18/17 Member Environmentalist Ronald 5. Smith MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE Active District4 1 12/18/17 Member Community At -Large William McDowell MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE Active District 4 2 12/18/17 Member Engineer Marina Advisory Committee Applicants June 13, 2017 District Employer Work Phone Category Phillip Davis Keith Heavilin Warren G. Madden Gerry C. Morrow Jonathan E. Villarreal Clayton E. Williams MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE District 4 District 4 District 3 District 4 District 2 District 5 Corpus Christi AutoPlex Del Mar College Navy Army Community Credit Union Whata burger Marine Spill Response Corp 6422 South Padre Island Dr. 4141 Old Brownsville Road 2730 Roddfield Road 6241 Saratoga 1667 Main St. Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Ingleside Community At -Large or Scientist i.e. Marine Biologist TX 361-334-7400 Community At -Large TX 361-698-2820 Community At -Large TX 361-986-4552 Community At -Large TX Community At -Large TX 361-776-5336 Community At -Large APPLICATION FOR A CITY BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE Submit Date: Jan 13, 2017 Profile Phillip Davis Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? CORPUS CHRISTI DOWNTOWN MANAGEMENT DISTRICT: Submitted PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Submitted TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMISSION: Submitted WATERSHORE AND BEACH ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Submitted MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Submitted Street Address vflOIMIENW1 Suite or Apt State City Postal Code What district do you live in? * �j District 4 Primary Phone Alternate Phone Employer Job Title Work Address - Street Address and Suite Number Work Address - City Work Address - State Phillip Davis Page 1 of 5 Work Address - Zip Code Work Phone pdavis@delmar.edu Work E-mail address Preferred Mailing Address ✓ Home/Primary Address ✓ Work Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: Anything outdoor related: Parks, Marina, Beaches, etc Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Active in Santa Fe Soccer Club, Santa Fe Swim Club and Downtown Optimist Club Why are you interested in serving on a City board, commission or committee? Registered Voter? Yes r No Current resident of the city? Yes No 35 If yes, how many years? Upload a Resume Phillip Davis Page 2 of 5 Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics I Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Gender w Male Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. I; I Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. 1J I Agree Phillip Davis Page 3 of 5 Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. w I Agree Board -specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * fJ Scientist, i.e. Marine Biologist Question applies to TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMISSION. Per city ordinance, at least one member of this commission shall represent the bicycling community. Do you qualify for this category? (r Yes No Phillip Davis Page 4 of 5 Question applies to WATERSHORE AND BEACH ADVISORY COMMITTEE Per city ordinance, the committee must include members representing certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * V' Scientist i.e.,Marine Biologist) Phillip Davis Page 5 of 5 APPLICATION FOR A CITY BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE Submit Date: Mar 14, 2017 Profile Keith Heavilin Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? AIRPORT BOARD: Submitted CIVIL SERVICE BOARD: Submitted CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION: Submitted PLANNING COMMISSION: Submitted MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Submitted Street Address Suite or Apt State City Postal Code What district do you live in? * IW District 4 Primary Phone Alternate Phone Corpus Christi AutoPlex General Manager Employer Job Title 6422 SPID Work Address - Street Address and Suite Number Corpus Christi Work Address - City TX Work Address - State Keith Heavilin Page 1 of 5 78418 Work Address - Zip Code 3613347400 Work Phone keith@ccautoplex.com Work E-mail address Preferred Mailing Address Home/Primary Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Why are you interested in serving on a City board, commission or committee? Registered Voter? Yes r No Current resident of the city? Yes r No 1 If yes, how many years? Keith Heavilin Resume 2016.docx Upload a Resume Keith Heavilin Page 2 of 5 Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics I Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Gender w Male Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. I; I Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. 1J I Agree Keith Heavilin Page 3 of 5 Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. iw I Agree Board -specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION,CIVIL SERVICE BOARD. Have you resided in the City for at least 3 years? e Yes No Question applies to CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION,CIVIL SERVICE BOARD. Have you held public office during the past 3 years? cYes ` No Question applies to CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION,CIVIL SERVICE BOARD. Are you over 25 years of age? 'Yes` No Question applies to MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * 1W None of the Above Keith Heavilin Page 4 of 5 Question applies to PLANNING COMMISSION. Are you a registered voter of the City of Corpus Christi? r Yes r No Keith Heavilin Page 5 of 5 Keith Heavilin WORK EXPERIENCE General Manager CC AutoPlex, Corpus Christi, TX April 2016 -Present • Oversee all operations of a start-up buy -here -pay -here car dealership, related finance company, and service shop • Responsible for establishing and implementing all processes and procedures to insure a profitable and compliant dealership and finance company. • Responsible for vehicle procurement, sales and collection operations and all accounting and financials. General Manager Smart Auto Inc., Knoxville, TN June 2010- May 2015 • Oversaw all operations of bicoastal, $38 million portfolio buy -here -pay -here car dealership, related finance company, and service shops • Directly managed 15 key managers including Sales, Service, Finance, General Counsel, Business Development, and Dealer Support personnel • Responsible for growing portfolio by 30% in 5 year tenure as General Manager Supported four full-service car dealership locations, hired key managers, developed and executed successful operational policies and procedures in all departments • Continually identified areas of improvement throughout the organization, developed strategic plan for improvement, managed process until goal metrics were reached Service Manager Smart Auto Inc., Knoxville, TN January 2010 • Changed parts ordering process to save $250,000 per year per location • Established Asset Management performance metrics and buying guides for buyers in all locations • Streamlined reconditioning process of assets to reduce cost by $250 per unit • Exceeded all established performance goals while reducing overhead and employee headcount Customer Relationship Manager/Underwriter Smart Auto Inc., Knoxville, TN August 2009 • Responsible for daily, weekly, and monthly collection goals including: cash collected, delinquency, repossessions, and charge offs. • Performed all underwriting of vehicle loans on site to buy from related sales company • Maintained relationships with customers throughout life of auto loan ensuring timely payments to the finance company SKILLS EDUCATION • Proficient manager of teams and individuals • Highly adaptable to new and changing conditions • Expert at finding bad/inefficient processes and procedures and implementing corrections for efficiency and profitability • Expert user of FEXDMS, Dialing Systems, Accurint, GPS Tracking Systems University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee APPLICATION FOR A CITY BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE Submit Date: Mar 07, 2017 Profile Warren G Madden Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Submitted Street Address City What district do you live in? * i District 3 111•11MaMN Suite or Apt State Primary Phone Alternate Phone Del Mar College Employer 4141 Old Brownsville Road Work Address - Street Address and Suite Number Corpus Christi Work Address - City Texas Work Address - State 78405 Work Address - Zip Code Associate Professor, Allied Health Department Chair Job Title Postal Code Warren G Madden Page 1 of 4 361-698-2820 Work Phone wgmadden@a delmar.edu Work E-mail address Preferred Mailing Address F? Home/Primary Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: No Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Allied Health Department Chair at Del Mar College, Surgical Technology Program Director at Del Mar College, Chair of Chair's Council at Del Mar College, regular contributor to Saltwater Angler Magazine, advisor with Texas Bluewater Kayak Classic fishing tournament Why are you interested in serving on a City board, commission or committee? Registered Voter? Yes r No Current resident of the city? Yes r No 45 If yes, how many years? Resume 2017.doc Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Warren G Madden Page 2 of 4 Demographics Ethnicity 17 Prefer not to Answer Gender IW Male Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. w I Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. rJ I Agree Warren G Madden Page 3 of 4 Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. w I Agree Board -specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * T Engineer r Environmentalist r Restaurant Representative (located within boundaries of Corpus Christi Downtown Management District) I- Scientist, i.e. Marine Biologist r None of the Above Warren G Madden Page 4 of 4 WARREN GLENN MADDEN PERSONAL I married Shannon Torno on December 15, 1990. Three children: Christine (20), Matthew (18), and Hannah (14). My family and I attend church regularly. I spend free time with the kids outdoors: we enjoy fishing, hunting, and camping. I have a budding art business, comprised primarily of graphite drawings, portraits, and photography. I am a sponsored kayak fisherman with a thriving YouTube channel use to educate others on how to safely navigate and fish the Gulf of Mexico from a kayak. My work and my hobbies reflect a love of nature and my attention to getting the details right. EDUCATION 1988 Certificate in Surgical Technology 1991 Associates in Arts, Del Mar College 1996 Bachelor in Science, Texas A&M -Kingsville 2008 Associate in Arts and Sciences, Del Mar College EMPLOYMENT 2016 - Chair of Allied Health Department Corpus Christi, Texas. Dean: Dr. Shannon Ydoyaga Duties: Provide strategic planning and collaborative leadership and advocacy for the department. Maintain the integrity of instructional programs, including the department's curriculum development and assessment activities. Organize and manage the department office. Oversee the hiring of adjunct and new personnel and the development of class scheduling. Oversee professional development, evaluation of department personnel, and student organizations within the department. Oversee the department's strategies for student recruitment and retention, including advising and counseling of students. Plan and execute statistical research. Serve on College committees. Communicate with faculty and staff, College administrators, and the community, including private and public schools and universities. Manage the department's budget development process. Maintain departmental records. Perform other related duties as assigned. 2014-2016 Interim Chair of Allied Health Department Corpus Christi, Texas. Dean: Dr. David Arreguin Duties: Provide strategic planning and collaborative leadership and advocacy for the department. Maintain the integrity of instructional programs, including the department's curriculum development and assessment activities. Organize and manage the department office. Oversee the hiring of adjunct and new personnel and the development of class scheduling. Oversee professional development, evaluation of department personnel, and student organizations within the department. Oversee the department's strategies for student recruitment and retention, including advising and counseling of students. Plan and execute statistical research. Serve on College committees. Communicate with faculty and staff, College administrators, and the community, including private and public schools and universities. Manage the department's budget development process. Maintain departmental records. Perform other related duties as assigned. 2008 - Program Director, Del Mar College, Surgical Technology Program Corpus Christi, Texas. Department Head: Duncan Samo Duties: Responsible for all aspects of the program including planning, development, organization, administration, review and effectiveness of the program, and teach in classroom, didactic, and lab components of the curriculum. 2005-2008 Clinical Coordinator, Del Mar College, Surgical Technology Program Corpus Christi, Texas. Program Director: Elena Mendieta, RN, MS Duties: Create schedule for students in hospital rotations, oversee students in clinical setting, and teach in lab, didactic, and classroom settings. Evaluate students at clinical sites on performance and ability levels. 1987.2004 Surgical Technologist, Doctor's Regional Medical Center Corpus Christi, Texas. Supervisor: Dottie Glaze, RN Duties: Assist in all surgeries offered at the hospital. Teach Del Mar students on days they are in the department 2001-2002 Adjunct Faculty, Del Mar College, and 2004 Surgical Technology Program Corpus Christi, Texas. Supervisor: Elena Mendieta, RN, MS Duties: Assist staff teaching in lecture, testing, some didactic instruction, lab settings, and at clinical affiliates. Evaluated students at clinical sites on performance and ability levels. 1996-2005 Science Teacher, Carroll High School Corpus Christi, Texas. Dean of Instruction: Christela Garza Duties: Responsible for six sections of Physics and Integrated Physics and Chemistry. Other areas: I am certified by the state to teach all secondary sciences, all English classes, and coach all sports offered at the secondary level. I coached a girls' soccer team for three years. APPLICATION FOR A CITY BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE Submit Date: Nov 02, 2016 Profile Gerry C Morrow Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Submitted Street Address City What district do you live in? * i District 4 111•11MaMN Suite or Apt State �rirr� MMINIMMI Primary Phone Alternate Phone Navy Army Community Credit Union Chief Lending Officer Employer Job Title 2730 Roddfield Road Work Address - Street Address and Suite Number Corpus Christi Work Address - City Tx Work Address - State 78414 Work Address - Zip Code Postal Code Gerry C Morrow Page 1 of 4 361 986 4552 Work Phone gmorrow@navyarmyccu.com Work E-mail address Preferred Mailing Address F? Home/Primary Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: None Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Executive Officer for Navy Army Community Credit Union for 12 years. Past board member of American Red Cross. Member of Corpus Christi Country Club. Licensed Coast Guard Captain. Why are you interested in serving on a City board, commission or committee? Registered Voter? Yes No Current resident of the city? Yes r No 35 If yes, how many years? Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Gerry C Morrow Page 2 of 4 Demographics Ethnicity 17 Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Gender I -J Male Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. w I Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. rJ I Agree Gerry C Morrow Page 3 of 4 Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. w I Agree Board -specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * W. Environmentalist Gerry C Morrow Page 4 of 4 APPLICATION FOR A CITY BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE Submit Date: Jan 21, 2017 Profile Jonathan E Prefix First Name Middle Initial Email Address Villarreal Last Name Which Boards would you like to apply for? FOOD SERVICE ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Submitted MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Submitted Street Address Suite or Apt State City Postal Code What district do you live in? * fJ District 2 IMMINIMINEN Primary Phone Alternate Phone Whataburger Team member Employer Job Title 6241 Saratoga Work Address - Street Address and Suite Number Corpus Christi Work Address - City Texas Work Address - State 78414 Work Address - Zip Code Jonathan E Villarreal Page 1 of 4 Work Phone Jonvilla711@gmail.com Work E-mail address Preferred Mailing Address F? Home/Primary Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: No Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Why are you interested in serving on a City board, commission or committee? Registered Voter? Yes No Current resident of the city? r Yes c No 21 If yes, how many years? BLUE RESUME OUTLINE.docx Upload a Resume Texas Food Manager Exam English 6601153.pdf Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Jonathan E Villarreal Page 2 of 4 Ethnicity I7 Hispanic Gender • Male Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. ▪ I Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. V" I Agree Jonathan E Villarreal Page 3 of 4 Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. w I Agree Board -specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to FOOD SERVICE ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * I7 None of the above Question applies to MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * IW None of the Above Jonathan E Villarreal Page 4 of 4 Jonathan E. Villarreal Education Associates in accounting I Projected graduation spring of 2018 !Del Mar College 101 Baldwin Blvd, Corpus Christi, TX 78404, (361) 698-1200 • Major: Accounting • Related coursework: Business Certifications REGISTERED PHARMACY TECHNICIAN • Registered with the Texas Board of Pharmacy • Registration No. 233371 • Expiration 1/31/2018 • PTCB No. 30000097 LICENSED FOOD MANAGER • Licensed as of 6/30/2015 in Nueces County • Permit #15-512 • Expiration 6/30/2017 Work Experience Pharmacy Tech !Kelly's Pharmacy and Compounding! 520 Everhart, Corpus Christi, Texas 78411, (361)334-4500 • Date of hire 7/11/2014 • Pharmacy Tech and Delivery driver Cafe Team Member !Target • Employment from 10/2013 to 06/2015 • Food Prep, customer service APPLICATION FOR A CITY BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE Submit Date: Jan 18, 2017 Profile Clayton E Williams Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Submitted Street Address City What district do you live in? * i District 5 11,11Marna Suite or Apt State MMININMI Primary Phone Alternate Phone Marine Spill Response Corp Lead Responder Employer Job Title 1667 Main ST Work Address - Street Address and Suite Number Ingleside Work Address - City TX Work Address - State 78362 Work Address - Zip Code Postal Code Clayton E Williams Page 1 of 4 3617765336 Work Phone williamsc@msrc.org Work E-mail address Preferred Mailing Address F? Home/Primary Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: None Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Work for the Nations leading Oil Spill Response corp in the nation. Hazwoper cert. various training in all environmental cleanup Why are you interested in serving on a City board, commission or committee? Registered Voter? Yes No Current resident of the city? Yes r No 9 If yes, how many years? Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Clayton E Williams Page 2 of 4 Demographics Ethnicity 17 Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Gender I -J Male Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. w I Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. rJ I Agree Clayton E Williams Page 3 of 4 Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. w I Agree Board -specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to MARINA ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * T Engineer r Environmentalist r Restaurant Representative (located within boundaries of Corpus Christi Downtown Management District) I- Scientist, i.e. Marine Biologist r None of the Above Clayton E Williams Page 4 of 4 City Of Corpus Christi MECHANICAL/PLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD BOARD DETAILS OVERVIEW SIZE 1 Seats TERM LENGTH 2 Years TERM LIMIT 6 Years The Mechanical/Plumbing Advisory Board advises the City Manager regarding any matter in the mechanical, plumbing, and irrigation fields that it considers should be brought to the attention of the City Council. Furthermore, the Mechanical/Plumbing Advisory Board shall have the power, after having obtained public comment, to recommend to the City Council changes to the City's Fuel Gas, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes. DETAILS COMPOSITION Eleven (1 1) persons appointed by the City Council: Three (3) persons, each of whom shall have at least five (5) years active experience as a plumber, at least three (3) years of which shall have been in Corpus Christi and at least two (2) of these persons shall be or have been Master Plumbers, preference for appointment may be given to plumbers licensed in the State of Texas and currently active in the plumbing trade; one (1) person who shall have at lease five (5) years of active experience as a mechanical engineer, preference for appointment may be given to professional engineers licensed in the State of Texas; one (1) person who shall have at least five (5) years experience in the home building industry; one (1) person who shall have at least five (5) years experience in the commercial building industry; three (3) persons, each of whom shall have at least five (5) years of active experience in heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration contracting business, preference for appointment may be given to persons licensed in the State of Texas in heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and refrigeration contracting (HVAC); one (1) person who shall have at least five (5) years of active experience in landscape irrigation, preference for appointment may be given to irrigators licensed in the State of Texas; and one (1) person not connected with the building industry. Six members constitute a quorum, and the concurring vote of not less than 6 members of the Board is necessary to constitute an official action of the Board. The Board shall elect a chairman and vice chairman during the first meeting of each calendar year. CREATION / AUTHORITY Code of Ordinances. Sec. 13-1, Subsection 105.3.1 Ord. No. 15267; 20294 - 5/3/88; 20674 - 5/1 6/89; 021 208 - 8/6/91; 022973 - 6/24/97; Sect. 14-226(c) Ord. 25467 - 9/9/03, 029726 1/15/13; Ord. No. 30590 - 8/25/15. MEETS Once quarterly, on the 2nd Thursday of the month in which called, 2:00 p.m., Frost Bank Building, Fire Department's Conference Room, 3rd Floor; and on call as MECHANICAL/PLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD Page 1 of 2 deemed necessary. TERM DETAILS Two-year staggered terms. DEPARTMENT Development Services COMMITTEE/ SUBCOMMITEE N/A AGENDAS OTHER INFORMATION MECHANICAL/PLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD Page 2 of 2 Mechanical/Plumbing Advisory Board June 13, 2017 Seven (7) vacancies with terms to 1/2/18 and 1/2/19 representing the following categories: 1 - Irrigator, 2 - Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration, 1 - Master Plumber, 1 -Home Builder, 1 - Commercial Builder and 1 - Person Not Connected to the Building Industry. (Note: Staff is recommending the postponement of the Commercial Builder and Not Connected to the Building Industry categories for further recruitment.) Carl Suding MECHANICAL/PLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD Seeking reappointment District4 Partial 01/02/17 Member Irrigator 75% 3/4 meetings (1 exc.) Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning and Mike Wanzer MECHANICAL/PLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD Seeking reappointment District 4 1 01/02/17 Chair Refrigeration 75% 3/4 meetings (1 exc.) Clinton Bailey MECHANICAL/PLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD Met six-year term limitation District4 3 01/02/17 Vice -Chair Master Plumber Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning and Bob Forbes MECHANICAL/PLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD Resigned District4 1 01/02/17 Member Refrigeration Vacant MECHANICAL/PLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD Vacant 01/02/18 Member Home Builder David Wallace MECHANICAL/PLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD Not seeking reappointment District 3 1 01/02/17 Member Commercial Builder Kenneth Mikeman, Jr. MECHANICAL/PLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD Not seeking reappointment District 1 Partial 01/02/17 Member Not Connected to the Building Industry Jared Merdes P.E. MECHANICAL/PLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD Active District 1 2 01/02/18 Member Mechanical Engineer Ronald Klepac MECHANICAL/PLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD Active District 1 3 01/02/18 Member Maverick C. Volesky Jr. MECHANICAL/PLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD Active District 5 1 01/02/18 Member Plumber Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Mike Dildy MECHANICAL/PLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD Active District 4 1 01/02/18 Member Master Plumber Mechanical/Plumbing Advisory Board Applicants June 13, 2017 :. _ - ■District PM ®Work Phone Benny M. Franklin MECHANICAL/PLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD District 4 Gentry Company Stacy Gallagher MECHANICAL/PLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD District 5 Stacy Gallagher Construction 1413 Corn Products Rd. Corpus Christi TX 361-289-0022 Master Plumber Travis M. Veary MECHANICAL/PLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD District 4 Weathertrol, Inc. 4219 Baldwin 361-533-7223 Corpus Christi TX 361-884-3851 Home Building Industry Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning & Refrigeration Contracting Business APPLICATION FOR A CITY BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE Submit Date: Jan 11, 2017 Profile Benny M. Franklin Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? MECHANICAL/PLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD: Submitted Street Address City What district do you live in? * i District 4 11,11Marna Suite or Apt State MMININMI Primary Phone Alternate Phone Gentry company Vice President Employer Job Title 1413 corn products rd. Work Address - Street Address and Suite Number Corpus Christi Work Address - City Texas Work Address - State 78409 Work Address - Zip Code Benny M. Franklin Postal Code 361-289-0022 Work Phone gentry.markf@sbcglobal.net Work E-mail address Preferred Mailing Address F? Home/Primary Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Master plumber, Master medical gas endorsement , Why are you interested in serving on a City board, commission or committee? Registered Voter? rYes cNo Current resident of the city? r Yes c No 35 If yes, how many years? Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Benny M. Franklin w Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Gender • Male Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. ▪ I Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. fJ I Agree Benny M. Franklin Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. w I Agree Board -specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to MECHANICAUPLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * IW Plumber (minimum five years active experience with at least 3 years in Corpus Christi - preference for appointment may be given to plumbers licensed in the State of Texas and currently active in the plumbing trade) FJ Master Plumber (minimum five years active experience with at least 3 years in Corpus Christi - preference for appointment may be given to plumbers licensed in the State of Texas and currently active in the plumbing trade) Benny M. Franklin APPLICATION FOR A CITY BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE Submit Date: May 02, 2017 Profile Stacy Gallagher Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? MECHANICAL/PLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD: Submitted Street Address City What district do you live in? * i District 5 111•11MaMN Suite or Apt State liNENIIIME1111 MONIM•MMI Primary Phone Alternate Phone Stacy Gallagher Construction Employer Work Address - Street Address and Suite Number Work Address - City TX Work Address - State Work Address - Zip Code Stacy Gallagher Job Title Postal Code 361-533-7223 Work Phone spgallagher@gmail.com Work E-mail address Preferred Mailing Address F? Work Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: Not at this time. Previously served on the MPAB. Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) National Kitchen & Bath Association Why are you interested in serving on a City board, commission or committee? Registered Voter? Yes No Current resident of the city? c Yes r No 60 If yes, how many years? Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Stacy Gallagher Demographics Ethnicity 17 Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Gender I -J Male Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. w I Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. rJ I Agree Stacy Gallagher Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. w I Agree Board -specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to MECHANICAUPLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * IW Home Building Industry (minimum five years' experience) Stacy Gallagher APPLICATION FOR A CITY BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE Submit Date: Feb 20, 2017 Profile Travis M Yeary Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Which Boards would you like to apply for? MECHANICAL/PLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD: Submitted Street Address City What district do you live in? * i District 4 11,11Marna Suite or Apt State Primary Phone Alternate Phone Weathertrol Inc Project Manager/Estimator Employer Job Title 4219 Baldwin Work Address - Street Address and Suite Number Corpus Christi Work Address - City Texas Work Address - State 78405 Work Address - Zip Code Travis M Yeary Postal Code 361-884-3851 Work Phone travis@weathertrol.net Work E-mail address Preferred Mailing Address F? Work Address Interests & Experiences Do you currently serve on any other City board, commission or committee at this time? If so, please list: Education, Professional and/or Community Activity (Present) Why are you interested in serving on a City board, commission or committee? Registered Voter? r: Yes ` No Current resident of the city? Yes r No 39 If yes, how many years? t.yeary 17.docx Upload a Resume Please upload any additional supporting documents Demographics Travis M Yeary w Caucasian/Non-Hispanic Gender • Male Verification City Code Requirement - As a board, commission, or committee member, you will be asked to adhere to: City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-65, which states that all members of City boards and commissions, including ad hoc committees, appointed by the City, must be residents of the city. A move outside the city limits of the city by any member shall constitute automatic resignation from the particular board or commission on which such member served. Also, City Code of Ordinances, Section 2-61, which provides that absences from more than 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during a term year on the part of any board, commission, or committee member shall result in an automatic termination. An absence shall be deemed unexcused unless excused by the board, commission or committee for good cause no later than its next meeting after the absence. ▪ I Agree Consent for Release of Information - I understand that if any member of the public makes a request for information included in this application for appointment it must be disclosed under the Public Information Act. I also understand that it may not be legally possible to maintain the confidentiality of such information, and I hereby release the City of Corpus Christi, and its agents, employees and officers, from any and all liability whatsoever if the information must be released pursuant to the Public Information Act. fJ I Agree Travis M Yeary Oath - I swear that all of the statements included in my application and attached documents, if any, are true and correct. iw I Agree Board -specific questions (if applicable) Question applies to MECHANICAUPLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD. Per city ordinance, the committee must include representatives from certain categories. Do you qualify for any of the following categories? * IW Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning & Refrigeration Contracting Business (minimum five years active experience- preference for appointment may be given to persons licensed in the State of Texas) Travis M Yeary Travis M. Yeary Summary: HVAC mechanical contracting professional with experience in project management, estimating, business development, and supervising HVAC fabrication and installation. 22 years of experience in the mechanical contracting industry with an established record of efficient and quality production. Work Experience: Weathertrol, Inc. 4219 Baldwin Blvd, Corpus Christi, TX 78405 Full-service commercial HVAC contractor 12 years: Project supervisor 8 years: Project management 7 years: Estimating, bidding and business development 22 years: Sheet metal fabrication and installation Skills: • Computerized duct fabrication system input. • Operating and running coil line and fitting machines. • Manual duct fabrication. • Field duct system installation. • Advance cutting systems • Trimble AutoBid Mechanical • Trimble AutoBid SheetMetal Education/Training/Certifications: Air Conditioning & Refrigeration Contractor LIC. #TACLA66293C — Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation June 1995 - Present Ashworth College, Atlanta, GA Diploma — The Professional Heating and Air Conditioning Program with Honors, November 14, 2012 AutoBid® SheetMetal training by QuickPen Certificate of Completion, January 13, 2012 Calallen High School, Corpus Christi, TX Diploma — May, 1995 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 30, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of June 13, 2017 DATE: TO: May 30, 2017 Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Andres Leal, Jr., P.E., Director of Street Operations andyl(c�cctexas.com (361) 857-1957 Kim Baker, Assistant Director of Financial Services -Purchasing Division KimB2 c(�cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 Purchase of Wavetronix Radar Detection Systems for Traffic Signal Systems CAPTION: Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a purchase from Twincrest Technologies, of Fort Worth, Texas for six Wavetronix radar detection systems in accordance with the cooperative purchasing agreement with the Houston -Galveston Area Council for a total amount of $99,400.00 and funded by the Redlight Photo Fund. This item is a one-time purchase. PURPOSE: This equipment is used in signalized traffic intersections for vehicle detection. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Radar detection systems are the new standard for traffic signal vehicle detection. These radar detection systems will be replacing the video detection systems currently in the field that are no longer working or serviceable. Many of these older units require maintenance every two weeks to clean the camera lenses. The new radar detection system will improve traffic flow and vehicle detection. They are more reliable, have better technology and are not affected by weather events unlike the existing video detection systems. ALTERNATIVES: None OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This purchase conforms to the City's purchasing policies and procedures and State statutes regulating procurement. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Redlight Photo Fund FINANCIAL IMPACT: x Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $99,400.00 0 $99,400.00 Encumbered / Expended Amount 0 0 This item $99,400.00 0 $99,400.00 BALANCE 0 0 0 Fund(s): Redlight Photo Fund Comments: The initial cost is $99,400.00 is funded in FY2016-17 by the Police Department. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Price Sheet CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION BUYER: Lydia Juarez ITEM 1. 2. 3. 4. DESCRIPTION WX-SS-225-4AC-650, 4 Approach Matrix System AC Power Pkg w/Click 650 SDLC Interface Module WX-SS-704-020, Sensor Pigtail with Molded Connector -20' WX-SS-705 Matrix/Advance Cable Wavetronix Programming Kit PRICE SHEET PURCHASE OF SIX WAVETRONIX DETECTION SYSTEMS HGAC BUY CONTRACT: PE05-15 QTY. UNIT 5 ea 20 ea 8000 ea 1 ea Twincrest Techno ogies Fort Worth, Texas UNIT PRICE $16,180.00 $140.00 $1.65 $2500.00 EXTENDED PRICE $80,900.00 $2,800.00 $13,200.00 $2500.00 TOTAL $99,400.00 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 30, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of June 13, 2017 DATE: May 30, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Dan Grimsbo, Interim Executive Director of Utilities DanG c(�cctexas.com (361) 826-1718 Kim Baker, Assistant Director of Financial Services, Purchasing Division KimB2(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 Supply Agreement for Saddle Service Taps for Waterlines CAPTION: Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a supply agreement with HD Supply Waterworks of Corpus Christi, Texas for the purchase of saddle service taps for waterlines in response to RFB 1069 based on the lowest, responsive, responsible bid for a total amount not to exceed $35,559.17, with an estimated expenditure of $11,853.00 in FY2016-2017 and funded by the Warehouse Stores Fund. The term of the agreement is for one year with an option to extend for up to two additional one-year periods, subject to the sole discretion of the City. PURPOSE: This item is to approve a supply agreement for saddle service taps for waterlines for the Utilities Department. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Saddles are used in the City's waterlines to tap into mains to supply water to new homes, businesses and other areas. The use of saddles allows installation of new piping into existing mains while the lines are live, keeping pipeline shutdowns limited and allows for good customer service to existing clients. The City received two responsive, responsible bids, out of 39 notifications issued, and is recommending the award to the lowest, responsive, responsible bidder, HD Supply Waterworks of Corpus Christi, Texas. ALTERNATIVES: None OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This purchase conforms to the City's purchasing policies and procedures and State statutes regulating procurement. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Warehouse Stores FINANCIAL IMPACT: x Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $2,800,000.00 $23,706.17 $2,823,706.17 Encumbered/ Expended Amount $1,000,720.46 $0.00 $1,000,720.46 This item $11,853.00 $23,706.17 $35,559.17 BALANCE $1,787,426.54 $0.00 $1,787,426.54 Fund(s): Warehouse Stores Fund Comments: The initial contract term total is $35,559.17, of which $11,853.00 will be funded in FY2016- 17. The total estimated contract value will be $ 106,677.51 if all options years are executed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Supply Agreement Bid Tabulation Attachment B- Bid!P,icing Schedule PURCHASING DIVISION CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI BID TABULATION BID INVITATION NO: 1nmy BUYER: Cynthia Perez SERVICE SADDLES Date: 04/27/17 DEDESCRIPTION QTY FERGUSON ENTERPRISES Corpus Christi, TX UNIT TOTAL PRICE PRICE HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS Corpus Christi, TX UNIT TOTAL PRICE PRICE 1u4ou^SADDLE, 3/4" TAP 15 12nU2^SADDLE, 1^TAP 10 1251 o1DrSADDLE, rTAP 30 1us2u.5"SADDLE, 1^TAP 20 1u»au^SADDLE, 1^TAP 10 12544^SADDLE, 1^TAP 10 1z554^SADDLE, 1^TAP 20 1uon4^SADDLE, 1.5" TAP 10 12sr4^SADDLE, u^TAP 1u 1258 0^SADDLE, .75"TAP 75 1mmu4"SADDLE, 2" TAP u 1o6ou'rSADDLE, 1.s^TAP 3 1261 24rSADDLE, a^TAP 3 1unu6''SADDLE, 1''TAP 240 1znne''SADDLE, 1u''TAP 24 1en4n^SADDLE, 2^TAP 24 12058^SADDLE, J5''TAP 120 1uoma^SADDLE, 1^TAP 78 12o78^SADDLE, 1.o''TAP 18 12608^SADDLE, 2^TAP 18 1zny1n^SADDLE, 1^TAP 12 1urn1o^SADDLE, u^TAP 6 1271 12^SADDLE, .7o^TAP 6 12ro1x^SADDLE, 1^TAP 18 1273 1u^SADDLE, 1 .5" TAP 12 1274 1x^SADDLE, 2rTAP 8 1275 1O^SADDLE, .75TAP 6 1276 1o^SADDLE, 1^TAP 6 1277 1V^SADDLE, 1zrTAP 6 12016"SADDLE, 2" TAP 6 1279 20" SADDLE, 2" TAP 4 TOTAL MANUFACTURER $27.86 27.86 27.86 28.42 28.98 27.80 28.13 35.10 35.10 32.71 231.75 231.75 256.06 32.71 38.33 38.33 38.84 38.84 46.16 45.63 76.68 88.95 49.09 49.09 95.58 61.85 123.94 123.94 134.27 134.27 $417.90 278.60 835.80 568.40 289.80 278.00 562.60 351.00 351.00 2,453.25 695.25 695.25 768.18 7,850.40 919.92 919.92 4,660.80 3,029.52 830.88 821.34 920.16 533.70 294.54 883.62 1,146.96 494.80 743.64 743.64 805.62 805.62 198.03 79212 $35,742.23 Smith -Blair $27.58 $413.70 27.58 275.80 27.58 827.40 28.40 568.00 28.98 289.80 27.75 277.50 28.05 561o0 35.90 359o0 35.90 359.00 32.0e 2.403.75 231J0 695.10 231J0 695.10 2*0.00 708.00 32.55 7.812.00 38.30 91e.20 38.30 918.20 38.55 4.620.00 38.00 3.042o0 48.15 830.70 45.15 e12.70 75.90 910.80 87a7 526.02 49.00 284.00 49.00 882.00 91J5 1.101o0 61f0 48*.40 123.80 742.80 123.80 742.80 134.20 805.20 134.20 805.20 200.00 800.00 Smith -Blair SUPPLY AGREEMENT NO. 1069 Saddle Service Taps for Waterlines THIS Saddle Service Taps for Waterlines Supply Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation ("City") and HD Supply Waterworks ("Supplier"), effective for all purposes upon execution by the City Manager or the City Manager's designee ("City Manager"). WHEREAS, Supplier has bid to provide Tap Saddles in response to Request for Bid No. 1069 ("RFB"), which RFB includes the required scope of work and all specifications and which RFB and the Supplier's bid response are incorporated by reference in this Agreement as Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively, as if each were fully set out here in its entirety. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Supplier agree as follows: Scope. Supplier will provide Tap Saddles in accordance with the attached Scope of Work, as shown in Attachment A, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. "Goods," "products", and "supplies", as used in this Agreement, refer to and have the same meaning. 2. Term. This Agreement is for 12 months. This Agreement includes an option to extend the term for up to two additional 12 -month periods ("Option Period"), provided, the parties do so prior to expiration of the original term or the then -current Option Period. The decision to exercise the option to extend the term of this Agreement is, at all times, within the sole discretion of the City and is conditioned upon the prior written agreement of the Supplier and the City Manager. 3. Compensation and Payment. The total value of this Agreement is not to exceed $35,559.17, subject to approved extensions and changes. Payment will be made for goods delivered and accepted by the City within 30 days of acceptance, subject to receipt of an acceptable invoice. All pricing must be in accordance with the attached Bid/Pricing Schedule, as shown in Attachment B, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 4. Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Page 1 of 7 under this Agreement, including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for payment. The City's Contract Administrator for this Agreement is as follows: Name: Robert Presnell Department: Financial Services -Warehouse Phone: 361-826-1750 Email: RobertPR@cctexas.com 5. Insurance. Before performance can begin under this Agreement, the Supplier must deliver a certificate of insurance ("COI"), as proof of the required insurance coverages, to the City's Risk Manager and the Contract Administrator. Additionally, the COI must state that the City will be given at least 30 days' advance written notice of cancellation, material change in coverage, or intent not to renew any of the policies. The City must be named as an additional insured. The City Attorney must be given copies of all insurance policies within 10 days of the City Manager's written request. Insurance requirements are as stated in Attachment C, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 6. Purchase Release Order. For multiple -release purchases of products to be provided by the Supplier over a period of time, the City will exercise its right to specify time, place and quantity of products to be delivered in the following manner: any City department or division may send to Supplier a purchase release order signed by an authorized agent of the department or division. The purchase release order must refer to this Agreement, and products will remain with the Supplier until such time as the products are delivered and accepted by the City. 7. Inspection and Acceptance. Any products that are delivered but not accepted by the City must be corrected or replaced immediately at no charge to the City. If immediate correction or replacement at no charge cannot be made by the Supplier, a replacement product may be bought by the City on the open market and any costs incurred, including additional costs over the item's bid price, must be paid by the Supplier within 30 days of receipt of City's invoice. 8. Warranty. The Supplier warrants that all products supplied under this Agreement are new, quality items that are free from defects, fit for their intended purpose, and of good material and workmanship. The Supplier warrants that it has clear title to the products and that the products are free of liens or encumbrances. In addition, the products purchased under this City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Page 2 of 7 Agreement shall be warranted by the Supplier or, if indicated in Attachment D by the manufacturer, for the period stated in Attachment D. Attachment D is attached to this Agreement and is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 9. Quality/Quantity Adjustments. Any quantities indicated on the Bid/Pricing Schedule are estimates only and do not obligate the City to order or accept more than the City's actual requirements nor do the estimates restrict the City from ordering less than its actual needs during the term of the Agreement and including any Option Period. Substitutions and deviations from the City's product requirements or specifications are prohibited without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator 10. Non -Appropriation. The continuation of this Agreement after the close of any fiscal year of the City, which fiscal year ends on September 30th annually, is subject to appropriations and budget approval specifically covering this Agreement as an expenditure in said budget, and it is within the sole discretion of the City's City Council to determine whether or not to fund this Agreement. The City does not represent that this budget item will be adopted, as said determination is within the City Council's sole discretion when adopting each budget. 11. Independent Contractor. Supplier will perform the work required by this Agreement as an independent contractor and will furnish such products in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances or conditions will any agent, servant or employee of the Supplier be considered an employee of the City. 12. Subcontractors. Supplier may use subcontractors in connection with the work performed under this Agreement. When using subcontractors, however, the Supplier must obtain prior written approval from the Contract Administrator if the subcontractors were not named at the time of bid. In using subcontractors, the Supplier is responsible for all their acts and omissions to the same extent as if the subcontractor and its employees were employees of the Supplier. All requirements set forth as part of this Agreement, including the necessity of providing a 001 in advance to the City, are applicable to all subcontractors and their employees to the same extent as if the Supplier and its employees had performed the work. 13. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by written change order signed by both parties. Change orders may be used to modify quantities as deemed necessary by the City. City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Page 3 of 7 14. Waiver. No waiver by either party of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement waives any subsequent breach of the same. 15. Taxes. The Supplier covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment taxes and all other related taxes. Upon request, the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of these taxes within 15 days of such request. 16. Notice. Any notice required under this Agreement must be given by fax, hand delivery, or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is deemed received on the day faxed or hand -delivered or on the third day after postmark if sent by certified mail. Notice must be sent as follows: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Robert Presnell Store Keeper 5352 Ayers st. Bldg. #6, Corpus Christi, Texas 78415 (361) 826-1750 IF TO SUPPLIER: HD Supply Waterworks Attn: Paul Rodriguez Branch Operations Manager 6941 Leopard St. Corpus Christi, TX 78409 (361) 289-2660 17. SUPPLIER AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS ("INDEMNITEES') FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER ON ACCOUNT OF PERSONAL INJURIES (INCLUDING DEATH AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS), PROPERTY LOSS OR DAMAGE, OR ANY OTHER KIND OF INJURY, LOSS, OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES WHICH ARISE OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEEMENT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE INJURIES, DEATH OR DAMAGES ARE CAUSED OR ARE CLAIMED City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Page 4 of 7 TO BE CAUSED BY THE CONCURRENT OR CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES, BUT NOT IF BY THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES UNMIXED WITH THE FAULT OF ANY OTHER PERSON. SUPPLIER MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, INVESTIGATE ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ANY KIND ARISING FROM ANY SAID LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF SUPPLIER UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. 18. Termination. (A) The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Supplier's failure to perform the work specified in this Agreement or to keep any required insurance policies in force during the entire term of this Agreement. The Contract Administrator must give the Supplier written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the Supplier has not cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. (B) Alternatively, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 30 days advance written notice to the Supplier. The City Manager may also terminate this Agreement upon 24 hours written notice to the Supplier for failure to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes as set out in this Agreement. 19. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement by the Supplier, or of any right or interest contained herein, is effective unless the City Manager first gives written consent to such assignment. The performance of this Agreement by the Supplier is of the essence of this Agreement, and the City Manager's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City Manager on any ground whatsoever. 20. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is considered to be severable and, if, for any reason, any provision or part of this Agreement is determined to be invalid and contrary to applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of nor affect those portions of this Agreement City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Page 5 of 7 that are valid, but this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part had been omitted. 21. Order of Precedence. In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement, its attachments, and exhibits, such conflicts and inconsistencies will be resolved by reference to the documents in the following order of priority: A. this Agreement and its attachments B. the bid solicitation document, including addenda (Exhibit 1) C. the Supplier's bid response (Exhibit 2) 22. Certificate of Interested Parties. Supplier agrees to comply with Texas Government Code Section 2252.908, as it may be amended, and to complete Form 1295 "Certificate of Interested Parties" as part of this Agreement. 23. Governing Law. This Agreement is subject to all federal, State, and local laws, rules, and regulations. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of the State of Texas, and such form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district, county, or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas. 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, either oral or written, between the parties. (SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS) City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Page 6 of 7 SUPPLIER Signature: Printed Name: ?au- Title: a(elne-ll 0p_e_covR .9;15 /1/IP Cy f3)e2 Date: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Signature: Printed Name: Title: Date: Attached and Incorporated by Reference: Attachment A: Scope of Work Attachment B: Bid/Pricing Schedule Attachment C: Insurance Requirements Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Incorporated by Reference Only: Exhibit 1: RFB No. 1069 Exhibit 2: Supplier's Bid Response City of Corpus Christi Supply Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1 /16 Page 7 of 7 Attachment A - Scope of Work 1.1 General Requirements/Background Information A. The Supplier shall provide tap saddles for water lines as outlined in this Scope of Work. B. Saddles are used in the city water lines to tap into mains in order to supply water to new homes, businesses and other areas. C. Use of a saddle allows installation of new piping into existing mains while the lines are live, keeping pipeline shutdowns limited and allows for good customer service to existing clients. 1.2 Scope of work A. The supplier shall provide tap saddles in various size as shown on the pricing sheet. B. Supplier must be able to supply items within 14 days. C. All material shipped will be delivered with an accompanying delivery ticket listing the City stock number. D. Supplier shall not impose a minimum order. The City will be able to order any amount at any time. E. If the proposer submits an "Equal to" item as a substitute for items on the bid form, the item shall be fully described so that it may be determined that the proposed item is "Equal to", or exceeds the item specified. The decision as to whether an item shall be considered equal to the requirements specified rests solely with the City. Full descriptive literature is requested for all items submitted as "Equal to" for items stated on the bid sheet(s). F. Supplier shall not impose a minimum order. The City will be able to order any amount at any time. G. If the proposer submits an "Equal to" item as a substitute for items on the bid form, the item shall be fully described so that it may be determined that the proposed item is "Equal to", or exceeds the item specified. The decision as to whether an item shall be considered "equal to" the requirements specified rests solely with the City. Full descriptive literature is requested for all items submitted as "Equal to". 1.3 Work Site and Conditions Items shall be delivered upon request to the City Warehouse at 5352 Ayers St. Bldg. #6 Corpus Christi, Texas 78415. 1.4 Supplier Quality Control and Superintendence The Supplier shall establish and maintain a complete Quality Control Program that is acceptable to the Contract Administrator to assure that the requirements of the Contract are provided as specified. The Supplier will also provide supervision of the work to insure it complies with the contract requirements. 1.5 Special Instructions A. Supplier must be able to supply items within 14 days. B. AN material shipped will be delivered with an accompanying delivery ticket listing the City stock number. Attachment B - Bid/Pricing Schedule vs CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI ' m.. ga �ORPoHA 1852 mate: ❑ BID FORM PURCHASING DIVISION RFB No. 1069, Saddle Service Taps for Waterlines �} PAGE i OF 2 c (I-7 Authorized Bidder: c tik)t, 7th(�} i�l� �4.1).11( Signature: �� I / � 7 IL��`� i G 1. Refer to "Instructions to Bidders" and Contract Terms and Conditions completing bid. 2. Quote your best price for each item. 3. In submitting this bid, Bidder certifies that: a. the prices in this bid have been arrived at independently, communication, or agreement with any other Bidder purpose of restricting competition with regard to prices; b. Bidder is an Equal Opportunity Employer; and the Disclosure on file with City's purchasing office, pursuant to the Code and true. c. Bidder is current with all taxes due and company is in required governmental agencies. d. Bidder acknowledges receipt and review of all addenda iv before without consultation, or competitor, for the of. Interesf information of Ordinances, is current good standing with all for this RFB. Item Description :.:...::::`'; :.:.:< `.::: ;UNIT `:; QTY Unit: Price . .............:... Total Price 1249 Service Saddle 2 in X .75 in Tap 15 EA a�, 5-e 9/'.7 Smith Blair - 315-0025606-000 1250 Service Saddle 2 in X 1 in Tap 10 EA ,/..) t7 j i- [i Smith Blair - 315-0021308-000 1251 Service Saddle 2 in X 1 in Tap 30 EA i9 7, 53 ,r;7. /U Smith Blair - 315-0025608-000 1252 Service Saddle 2.5 in X lin Tap 20 EA - (}� . 00 Smith Blair - 315-0029108-000 1253 Service Saddle 3 in X 1 in Tap 10 EA 9801 & Smith Blair - 315-0035408-000 1254 Service Saddle 4 in X 1 in Tap 10 EA 9q r]s p (4, t$o Smith Blair - 315-0048008-000 ** 1255 Service Saddle 4 in X lin Tap 20 EA 98,o5--- 5-0-(O 561.0 Smith Blair - 315-0056308-000 1256 Service Saddle 4 in X 1.5 in Tap 10 EA 42(-) 30 (X) Smith Blair - 315-0056312-000 1257 Service Saddle 4 in X 2 i Tap 10 EA 35.46 35.00 Smith Blair - 315-0056314-000 1258 Service Saddle 6 in X .75 in Tap 75 EA 310s- Ot/03,- 71-' Smith Blair- 315-0076006-000 *N 7,812. ** 742. 1259 Service Saddle 24 in X 2 in Tap 3 EA ggj ) (0/', - / Smith Blair - 317-00258014-000 1260 Service Saddle 24 in X 1.5 in Tap 3 EA (P)3). f-70 (Cq5. /o Smith Blair - 317-00258012-000 1261 Service Saddle 24 in X 2 in Tap 3 EA SLI, 00 76? pc) Smith Blair - 362-00285014-000 1262 Service Saddle 6 in X 1 in Tap 240 EA 3,491 , 55 0 7300 r) Smith Blair - 315-0076008-000 - 1263 Service Saddle 6 in X 1.5 in Tap 24 EA „ 51) g74. 2 0 Smith Blair - 315-00760102-000 1264 Service Saddle 6 in X 2 in Tap 24 EA 3 942 6 Smith Blair - 315-0076014-000 1265 Service Saddle 8 in X .75 in Tap 120 EA 36. SS I/6,g CO Smith Blair - 315-00101006-000 1266 Service Saddle 8 in X 1 in Tap 78 EA % 96%, 1C) Smith. Blair - 315.00101008-000 31, 60 1267 Service Saddle 8 in X 1.5 in Tap 18 EA 1,7q, 7_5' 830.20 Smith B lair - 315-00101012-000 1268 Service Saddle 8 in X 2 in Tap 18 EA (5617.70 Smith Blair - 315-00905014-000 1269 Service Saddle 10 in X 1 in Tap 12 EA 7596 q/0.60 Smith Blair - 317-00121208-000 1270 Service Saddle 10 in X 2 in Tap 6 EA {Jr f-] 5,2(Q.0) , Smith Blair - 317-001212014-000 , 1271 Service Saddle 12 in X .75 in Tap 6 EA&.) 77 gg.v.GCS Smith Blair - 315-00143206-000. 1272 Service Saddle 12 in X1 in Tap 18 EA a{ri R .00 Smith Blair - 315-00143208-000 1273 Service Saddle 12 in X 1.5 in Tap 12 EA wt. -7J— //)7 6(0 Smith Blair - 317-001432012-000 1274 Service Saddle 12 in X 2 in Tap 8 EA 6l S) 1/ /0 Smith Blair - 315-00132014-000 1275 Service Saddle 16 in X .75 in Tap 6 EA /64 /0 Smith Blair - 317-00178006-000. 1276 Service Saddle 16 in X 1 in Tap 6 EA 1d. (5.9 7C/) - Smith Blair - 317-00178008-000 1277 Service Saddle 16 in X 1.5 in. Tap 6 EA /3c/: RD 6133:2 0 Smith Blair - 317-00178012-000 1278 Service Saddle 16 in X 2 in Tap 6 EA 7(t-� 2C. 0 S-: 2 0 Smith Blair - 317-00178014-000 1279 Service Saddle 20 in X 2 in Tap 4 EA ,0t) 00 S0O. 00 Smith Blair - 317-00216014-000 Total 35/776 $35,559.17 ** Extended prices are incorrect. Staff/cp corrected vendors math. Attachment C - Insurance Requirements CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY INSURANCE A. Contractor must not commence work under this contract until all insurance required has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Contractor must not allow any subcontractor, to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. B. Contractor must furnish to the City's Risk Manager and Contract Administrator one (1) copy of Certificates of Insurance with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies by endorsement, and a waiver of subrogation endorsement is required on GL, AL and WC if applicable. Endorsements must be provided with Certificate of Insurance. Project name and/or number must be listed in Description Box of Certificate of Insurance. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -day advance written notice of cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination required on all certificates and policies. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises - Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1. Owned $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit 2. Hired and Non -Owned 3. Rented/Leased WORKERS'S COMPENSATION (All States Endorsement if Company is not domiciled in Texas) Employers Liability Statutory and complies with Part II of this Exhibit. $500,000/$500,000/$500,000 C. In the event of accidents of any kind related to this contract, Contractor must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. II. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Applicable for paid employees, Contractor must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers' compensation coverage provided must be in statutory amounts according to the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation. An All States Endorsement shall be required if Contractor is not domiciled in the State of Texas. B. Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Contractors sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. C. Contractor shall be required to submit renewal certificates of insurance throughout the term of this contract and any extensions within 10 days of the policy expiration dates. All notices under this Exhibit shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 D. Contractor agrees that, with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • List the City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, as additional insureds by endorsement with regard to operations, completed operations, and activities of or on behalf of the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workerscompensation policy; • Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and • Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any, cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination in coverage and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. E. Within five (5) calendar days of a cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination of coverage, Contractor shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Contractor's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. F. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Contractor's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Contractor to stop work hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. G. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contractor's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this contract. H. It is agreed that Contractors insurance shall be deemed primary and non- contributory with respect to any insurance or self-insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this contract. I It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this contract. Attachment C - Bond Requirements No bond requirements necessary for this service agreement; Section 5. (8) is null for this service agreement. ATTACHMENT D: WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS No warranty requirements necessary for this service agreement; Section 8. Warranty is null for this service agreement. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2017-206935 Date Filed: 05/12/2017 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. HD Supply WaterWorks Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City Of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identity the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. 1069 Saddle Service Taps For Waterlines 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. 13 6 AFFIDAVIT < �` � -- J^paY P J '° V UVELSA V E LA CERDA 4f�.._ ,1 ID# 12494279-5 _• r c�� °' ` Notary Public 5 1�� STATE OF TEXAS I swear, or under penalty of perjury, th e above disclosure is true and correct. 0 I" //(1 { ,. y=.„E„:•�'' My Comm. Exp. 06-01.2020 > Signature of authorized agent of contracting b ntity 40v 4v4”V v Gry v vv Cr .. AFFIX NOTARY STAMP I SEAL ABOVE Sworp,t9 and subscribed before me, by the said F�4� (f.Ckd,,d) , this the day of /714.f 20 / / , to certify which. witness my hand and seal of office. c U (///V al I Oa 6/) cV61g; •1 ' 3Z1V(- 1 %f 49 1-00 Signature of officer administering nth Printed name of officer administeng oa Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Caeiffnission WNW. ethic s.state.tx. us Version V1.0.883 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 30, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of June 13, 2017 DATE: May 30, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Dan Grimsbo, Interim Executive Director of Utilities DanG(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-1718 Kim Baker, Assistant Director of Financial Services -Purchasing Division KimB2 c(�cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 Electrical Services for Sunrise Beach, Rincon Pump Station and Wesley Seale Dam CAPTION: Motion authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a service agreement with Advantage Electrical Contracting & Maintenance, Inc., of Corpus Christi, Texas for the Electrical Services for Sunrise Beach, Rincon Pump Station and Wesley Seale Dam in response to RFB 1056 based on the lowest, responsive, responsible bid for a total amount not to exceed $49,475 with an estimated expenditure of $16,492 in FY2016-2017 and funded by the Water Fund. The term of the agreement is for one year with an option to extend for up to two additional one-year periods, subject to the sole discretion of the City. PURPOSE: This item is to approve a service agreement for Electrical Services for Sunrise Beach, Rincon Pump Station and Wesley Seale Dam for the Utilities Department. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The capability to have on-call service for electrical repairs is critical to the operations at Wesley Seale Dam, Sunrise Beach and Rincon Pump Station to minimize down-time relation to electrical services at these locations. The City received one responsive bid out of 206 notifications issued, and is recommending the award to the lowest, responsive, responsible bidder, Advantage Electrical Contracting & Maintenance, Inc. ALTERNATIVES: NA OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not Applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This purchase conforms to the City's purchasing policies and procedures and State statutes regulating procurement. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Utilities Department — Water FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Operating ❑ Revenue ❑Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $96,815.57 $32,983.00 $129,798.57 Encumbered / Expended Amount $52,774.31 $0.00 $52,774.31 This item $16,492.00 $32,983.00 $49,475.00 BALANCE $27,549.26 $0.00 $27,549.26 Fund(s): Water Comments: The initial contract term total is $49,475, of which $16,492 is funded in FY2016-17. The total estimated contract value will be $148,425 if all options years are executed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Supply Agreement Bid Tabulation CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION BUYER: Lydia Juarez BID TABULATION- 1056 ELECTRICAL REPAIR SERVICES FOR SUNRISE BEACH, RINCON PUMP STATION AND WESLEY SEALE DAM DATE: March 17, 2017 RECORDED BY: Cynthia Perez Supplier Advantage Electrical Contracting & Maintenance Incorporated Corpus Christi, TX Unit Price (1-6) Total Price Item Description Qty. Unit % Markup (7) On Call Services Electrician Normal Hours (M -F 8:OOam- 5:00 pm to include holidays) 1 Journeyman 110 HRS $70.00 $7,700.00 2 Helper 110 HRS $45.00 $4,950.00 3 Master Electrician 80 HRS $75.00 $6,000.00 Electrician After Hours (M -F 5:01pm- 7:59 pm to include holidays and weekends) 4 Journeyman 70 HRS $105.00 $7,350.00 5 Helper 70 HRS $67.50 $4,725.00 6 Master Electrician 60 HRS $112.50 $6,750.00 7 Material Mark-up 10,000 Estimated $ 20% $12,000.00 Total $49,475.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT NO. 1056 Electrical Repair Services for Sunrise Beach, Rincon Pump Station and Wesley Seale Dam THIS Electrical Repair Services for Sunrise Beach, Rincon Pump Station and Wesley Seale Dam Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation ("City") and Advantage Electrical Contracting & Maintenance Incorporated ("Contractor"), effective upon execution by the City Manager or the City Manager's designee ("City Manager"). WHEREAS, Contractor has bid to provide Electrical Repair Services for Sunrise Beach, Rincon Pump Station and Wesley Seale Dam in response to Request for Bid/Proposal No. 1056 ("RFB/RFP"), which RFB/RFP includes the required scope of work and all specifications and which RFB/RFP and the Contractor's bid or proposal response, as applicable, are incorporated by reference in this Agreement as Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively, as if each were fully set out here in its entirety. 1. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Contractor agree as follows: Scope. Contractor will provide Electrical Repair Services for Sunrise Beach, Rincon Pump Station and Wesley Seale Dam ("Services") in accordance with the attached Scope of Work, as shown in Attachment A, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety, and in accordance with Exhibit 2. 2. Term. This Agreement is for 12 months, with performance commencing upon the date of issuance of a notice to proceed from the Contract Administrator or Purchasing Division. This Agreement includes an option to extend the term for up to 2 additional 12 -month periods ("Option Period"), provided, the parties do so prior to expiration of the original term or the then -current Option Period. The decision to exercise the option to extend the term of this Agreement is, at all times, within the sole discretion of the City and is conditioned upon the prior written agreement of the Contractor and the City Manager. 3. Compensation and Payment. The total value of this Agreement is not to exceed $49,475.00, subject to approved extensions and changes. Payment will be made for Services completed and accepted by the City City of Corpus Christi Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Page 1 of 8 within 30 days of acceptance, subject to receipt of an acceptable invoice. All pricing must be in accordance with the attached Bid/Pricing Schedule, as shown in Attachment B, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 4. Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator designated by the City is responsible for approval of all phases of performance and operations under this Agreement, including deductions for non-performance and authorizations for payment. The City's Contract Administrator for this Agreement is as follows: Name: Diana Zertuche Garza Department: Utilities 361-826-1827 DianaGcctexas.com 5. Insurance; Bonds. (A) Before performance can begin under this Agreement, the Contractor must deliver a certificate of insurance ("COI"), as proof of the required insurance coverages, to the City's Risk Manager and the Contract Administrator. Additionally, the COI must state that the City will be given at least 30 days' advance written notice of cancellation, material change in coverage, or intent not to renew any of the policies. The City must be named as an additional insured. The City Attorney must be given copies of all insurance policies within 10 days of the City Manager's written request. Insurance requirements are as stated in Attachment C, the content of which is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. (B) In the event a payment bond, a performance bond, or both, are required of the Contractor to be provided to the City under this Agreement before performance can commence, the terms, conditions, and amounts required in the bonds and appropriate surety information are as included in the RFB/RFP or as may be added to Attachment C, and such content is incorporated here in this Agreement by reference as if each bond's terms, conditions, and amounts were fully set out here in its entirety. 6. Purchase Release Order. For multiple -release purchases of Services to be provided by the Contractor over a period of time, the City will exercise its right to specify time, place and quantity of Services to be delivered in the following manner: any City department or division may send to Contractor a purchase release order signed by an authorized agent of the department City of Corpus Christi Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1 /16 Page 2 of 8 or division. The purchase release order must refer to this Agreement, and Services will not be rendered until the Contractor receives the signed purchase release order. 7. Inspection and Acceptance. Any Services that are provided but not accepted by the City must be corrected or re -worked immediately at no charge to the City. If immediate correction or re -working at no charge cannot be made by the Contractor, a replacement service may be procured by the City on the open market and any costs incurred, including additional costs over the item's bid/proposal price, must be paid by the Contractor within 30 days of receipt of City's invoice. 8. Warranty. The Contractor warrants that all products supplied under this Agreement are new, quality items that are free from defects, fit for their intended purpose, and of good material and workmanship. The Contractor warrants that it has clear title to the products and that the products are free of liens or encumbrances. In addition, the products purchased under this Agreement shall be warranted by the Contractor or, if indicated in Attachment D by the manufacturer, for the period stated in Attachment D. Attachment D is attached to this Agreement and is incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if fully set out here in its entirety. 9. Quality/Quantity Adjustments. Any Service quantities indicated on the Bid/Pricing Schedule are estimates only and do not obligate the City to order or accept more than the City's actual requirements nor do the estimates restrict the City from ordering less than its actual needs during the term of the Agreement and including any Option Period. Substitutions and deviations from the City's product requirements or specifications are prohibited without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator. 10. Non -Appropriation. The continuation of this Agreement after the close of any fiscal year of the City, which fiscal year ends on September 30th annually, is subject to appropriations and budget approval specifically covering this Agreement as an expenditure in said budget, and it is within the sole discretion of the City's City Council to determine whether or not to fund this Agreement. The City does not represent that this budget item will be adopted, as said determination is within the City Council's sole discretion when adopting each budget. 11. Independent Contractor. Contractor will perform the work required by this Agreement as an independent contractor and will furnish such Services in its own manner and method, and under no circumstances or conditions will City of Corpus Christi Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1 /16 Page 3 of 8 any agent, servant or employee of the Contractor be considered an employee of the City. 12. Subcontractors. Contractor may use subcontractors in connection with the work performed under this Agreement. When using subcontractors, however, the Contractor must obtain prior written approval from the Contract Administrator if the subcontractors were not named at the time of bid or proposal, as applicable. In using subcontractors, the Contractor is responsible for all their acts and omissions to the same extent as if the subcontractor and its employees were employees of the Contractor. All requirements set forth as part of this Agreement, including the necessity of providing a COI in advance to the City, are applicable to all subcontractors and their employees to the same extent as if the Contractor and its employees had performed the work. 13. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by written change order signed by both parties. Change orders may be used to modify quantities as deemed necessary by the City. 14. Waiver. No waiver by either party of any breach of any term or condition of this Agreement waives any subsequent breach of the same. 15. Taxes. The Contractor covenants to pay payroll taxes, Medicare taxes, FICA taxes, unemployment taxes and all other related taxes. Upon request, the City Manager shall be provided proof of payment of these taxes within 15 days of such request. 16. Notice. Any notice required under this Agreement must be given by fax, hand delivery, or certified mail, postage prepaid, and is deemed received on the day faxed or hand -delivered or on the third day after postmark if sent by certified mail. Notice must be sent as follows: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Diana Zertuche Garza Title: Contracts/Funds Administrator Address: O.N. Stevens Water Treatment Plant Fax: 361-826-488 IF TO CONTRACTOR: Advantage Electrical Contracting & Maintenance, Incorporated Attn: Russel Canales Title: President City of Corpus Christi Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Page 4 of 8 Address: P.O. Box 27 Corpus Christi Texas 78403 Fax: 361-888-5978 17. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS ("INDEMNITEES') FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER ON ACCOUNT OF PERSONAL INJURIES (INCLUDING DEATH AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS), PROPERTY LOSS OR DAMAGE, OR ANY OTHER KIND OF INJURY, LOSS, OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES WHICH ARISE OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEEMENT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE INJURIES, DEATH OR DAMAGES ARE CAUSED OR ARE CLAIMED TO BE CAUSED BY THE CONCURRENT OR CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES, BUT NOT IF BY THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES UNMIXED WITH THE FAULT OF ANY OTHER PERSON. CONTRACTOR MUST, AT ITS OWN EXPENSE, INVESTIGATE ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS, ATTEND TO THEIR SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITION, DEFEND ALL ACTIONS BASED THEREON WITH COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND PAY ALL CHARGES OF ATTORNEYS AND ALL OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ANY KIND ARISING FROM ANY SAID LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, OR ACTIONS. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. 18. Termination. (A) The City Manager may terminate this Agreement for Contractor's failure to perform the work specified in this Agreement or to keep any required insurance policies in force during the entire term of this Agreement. The Contract Administrator must give the Contractor written notice of the breach and set out a reasonable opportunity to cure. If the City of Corpus Christi Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1 /16 Page 5 of 8 Contractor has not cured within the cure period, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement immediately thereafter. (B) Alternatively, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 30 days advance written notice to the Contractor. The City Manager may also terminate this Agreement upon 24 hours written notice to the Contractor for failure to pay or provide proof of payment of taxes as set out in this Agreement. 19. Assignment. No assignment of this Agreement by the Contractor, or of any right or interest contained herein, is effective unless the City Manager first gives written consent to such assignment. The performance of this Agreement by the Contractor is of the essence of this Agreement, and the City Manager's right to withhold consent to such assignment is within the sole discretion of the City Manager on any ground whatsoever. 20. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is considered to be severable and, if, for any reason, any provision or part of this Agreement is determined to be invalid and contrary to applicable law, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of nor affect those portions of this Agreement that are valid, but this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part had been omitted. 21. Order of Precedence. In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement, its attachments, and exhibits, such conflicts and inconsistencies will be resolved by reference to the documents in the following order of priority: A. this Agreement and its attachments B. the bid solicitation document, including addenda (Exhibit 1) C. the Contractor's bid response (Exhibit 2) 22. Certificate of Interested Parties. Contractor agrees to comply with Texas Government Code Section 2252.908, as it may be amended, and to complete Form 1295 "Certificate of Interested Parties" as part of this Agreement. 23. Governing Law. This Agreement is subject to all federal, State, and local laws, rules, and regulations. The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this Agreement is the law of the State of Texas, and such form and venue for such disputes is the appropriate district, county, or justice court in and for Nueces County, Texas. City of Corpus Christi Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1/16 Page 6 of 8 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, either oral or written, between the parties. (SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS) City of Corpus Christi Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1 /16 Page 7 of 8 C5LA7- Printed Name: Russell J. Canales Title: President Date: April 17, 2017 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Signature: Printed Name: Title: Date: Attached and Incorporated by Reference: Attachment A: Scope of Work Attachment B: Bid/Pricing Schedule Attachment C: Insurance/Bond Requirements Attachment D: Warranty Requirements Incorporated by Reference Only: Exhibit 1: RFB/RFP No. 1056 Exhibit 2: Contractor's Bid/Proposal Response City of Corpus Christi Service Agreement Standard Form Approved as to Legal Form 7/1 /16 Page 8 of 8 1.1 Attachment A: Scope of Work General Requirements/Background Information A. The Contractor shall provide on call electrical services for Sunrise Beach, Rincon Pump Station and Wesley Seale Dam as outlined in this Scope of Work. 1.2 Scope of work A. General 1. The Contractor shall be able to perform specified services twenty-four (24) hours a day, three hundred and sixty-five (365) days per year on an as needed basis. The City will use prudent judgment when calling after regular working hours for specific services. 2. The Contractor shall receive work order requests and return phone request within 30 minutes of a call being placed by the City. 3. The Contractor shall be on site at Sunrise Beach and all listing locations within two hours or within an agreeable time frame determined by the City and the Contractor of receipt of work order requests. 4. The Contractor shall repair the electrical deficiencies within 24 -hours of arrival on site or have communicated with the Contract Administrator of any conditions that may delay work being completed within 24 -hours. 5. The Contractor shall have a sufficient number of licensed electrical technicians registered with the State of Texas in accordance with Texas Department of Licensing and Regulations (TDLR), and be clean of TDLR violations three years prior to solicitation date. 6. Any personnel assigned to the service agreement shall meet all applicable certification requirements of any regulatory agency having jurisdiction. 7. The Contractor shall ensure that all personnel are continuously trained to meet the latest electrical technology and industry standards. 8. The Contractor shall be responsible for assuring the safety of its employees, City employees, and the general public during performance of all services under this agreement. 9. The Contractor shall assure that all crews are fully and properly equipped to perform services promptly and safely without delay. Page 1 of 5 10. All personnel assigned to the service agreement shall wear proper working attire, including safety equipment and any company issued photo identification, if issued by the Contractor. All personnel shall be neatly dressed in shirts, safety shoes, and long pants. Shorts, tank -tops or torn clothing are unacceptable. Clothing worn shall be suitable for electrical work in accordance with NFPA 70E requirements. Contractor shall furnish all necessary management, supervision, labor, equipment, materials, transportation, and supplies required to repair, alter electrical systems. All work performed and services provided must be accomplished in a manner that meets all applicable original equipment specifications, trade standards and provisions, and federal, state and local codes and regulations. 12. Contractor shall dispose of all worn/defective parts, oils, solvents, in accordance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations as to ensure the highest level of safety to the environment and public health. 13. All materials used must be factory new/unused and free of defects in materials and workmanship. 14. Contractor is responsible for making repairs to or replacement of any material or equipment damaged during the completion of work or as the result of action or inaction by contractor's staff. 15. The City retains the right to retain ownership of any or all electrical equipment purchased under this agreement at the City's sole discretion. 16. Contractor shall not store worn or defective parts on City premises at the end of the work day unless otherwise specified by the Contract Administrator or designee. 17. Contractor must clean work site from debris or hazards at the end of every work day. 18. At the time of completion of any and all repairs, the Contractor shall report back to the Contract Administrator. Page 2 of 5 19. All repairs shall be completely documented by the Contractor. A copy of each work order or repair slip will be left with personnel at the location site to be forwarded to the Contract Administrator. The work order or repair slip shall contain the following information: • Site location of the equipment repaired • Details of what work was performed • Name and number of any parts which required replacement 20. If any item of equipment covered under this service agreement is deemed non -repairable, the Contractor shall immediately notify the Contract Administrator. 21. If repairs are deemed major, defined as exceeding $1,000.00, Contractor shall provide a cost estimate to include all labor, parts, costs associated to replace/repair requested items. Utilizing the pricing provided in the agreement. 22. Contractor shall take care to limit the interference with the day to day operations of the building occupants. Precautions should be taken at all ties to protect pedestrians and building occupants during the work performance. B. The Types of services and items covered by this agreement include, but are not limited to: 1. Assemble, install test and maintain electrical or electronic wiring, equipment, appliances, apparatus, and fixtures, using hand and power tools. 2. Diagnose malfunctioning systems, apparatus, and components, using test equipment and hand tools, to locate the cause of a breakdown and correct the problem. 3. Data and telephone cabling. 4. Connect wires to circuit breakers, transformers, or other components. 5. Inspect electrical systems, equipment, and components to identify hazards, defects, and the need for adjustment or repair, and to ensure compliance with codes. 6. Advise management on whether continued operation of equipment could be hazardous. Page 3 of 5 7. Test electrical systems and continuity of circuits in electrical wiring, equipment, and fixtures, using testing devices such as ohmmeters, voltmeters, and oscilloscopes, to ensure compatibility and safety of system. 8. Plan layout and installation of electrical wiring, equipment and fixtures, based on job specifications and local codes. 9. Prepare sketches or follow blueprints to determine the location of wiring and equipment and to ensure conformance to building and safety codes. 10. Use a variety of tools and equipment such as power construction equipment, measuring devices, power tools, and testing equipment including oscilloscopes, ammeters, and test lamps. 11. Install ground leads and connect power cables to equipment, such as motors. 12. Repair or replace wiring, equipment, and fixtures, using hand and power tools. 13. Work from ladders, scaffolds, and roofs, to install, maintain or repair electrical wiring, equipment, and fixtures. 14. Place conduit (pipes or tubing) inside designated partitions, walls or other concealed areas, and pull insulated wires or cables through the conduit to complete circuits between boxes. 15. Construct and fabricate parts, using hand tools and specifications. 15. Fasten small metal or plastic boxes to walls to house electrical switches or outlets. 16. Perform physically demanding tasks, such as digging trenches to lay conduit and moving and lifting heavy objects. 17. Provide preliminary sketches and cost estimates for materials and/or services. 18. Provide assistance during emergencies by operating floodlights and generators, placing flares, and driving needed vehicles. 19. Perform administrative duties in support of repairs and/or new installations, such as maintaining records and files, preparing reports and ordering supplies and equipment. Page 4 of 5 1.3 Work Site and Conditions A. The work will be performed at the following locations: • Wesley Seale Dam End of County Road 365 Sandia Texas 78383 • Sunrise Beach 22825 Park Road 25 Mathis Texas 78368 • Rincon Pump Station Near Labonte Park 1.4 Contractor Quality Control and Superintendence The Contractor shall establish and maintain a complete Quality Control Program that is acceptable to the Contract Administrator to assure that the requirements of the Contract are provided as specified. The Contractor will also provide supervision of the work to insure it complies with the contract requirements. 1.5 Special Instructions A. Apply a warranty, when applicable, such as installation of new equipment. For example, re -wiring, meters and breaker boxes. B. Invoices shall include itemized records of the following: 1. Work description, location and date of repairs 2. Labor 3. Parts Page 5 of 5 Attachment B: Bid/Pricing Schedule CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI BID FORM PURCHASING DIVISION RFB No. 1056, Electrical Repair Services for Sunrise Beach, Rincon Pump Station and Wesley Seale Dam Date: March 17, 2017 Authorized Bidder: Advantage Electrical Cont. & Maint. Inc Signature: PAGE 1 OF 1 Cf1/4-016---A: 1. Refer to "instructions to Bidders" and Contract Terms and Conditions before completing bid. 2. Quote your best price for each item. 3. In submitting this bid, Bidder certifies that: a. the prices in this bid have been arrived at independently, without consultation, communication, or agreement with any other Bidder or competitor, for the purpose of restricting competition with regard to prices; b. Bidder is an Equal Opportunity Employer; and the Disclosure of Interest information on file with City's purchasing office, pursuant to the Code of Ordinances, is current and true, c. Bidder is current with all taxes due and company is in good standing with all required governmental agencies. d. Bidder acknowledges receipt and review of all addenda for this RFB. Item Description QTY UNIT Unit Price (1-6) % Markup (7) Total Price - On Call Services Electrician Normal Hours (M -F 8:OOam - 5:OOpm to include holidays) 1 Journeyman 110 HRS $70.00 $7.700.00 2 Helper 110 HRS $45.00 $4,950.00 3 Master Electrician 80 . HRS $75.00 $6,000.00 Electrician After Hours (5:01 pm - 7:59am to include holidays and weekends) 4 Journeyman 70 HRS $105.00 $7 350.00 5 1 Helper 70 HRS $ 67.50 $4,725.00 6 Master Electrician 60 HRS $112.50 $6.750.00 7 Material Mark-Up* 10,000 Estimated $ 2,000.00 20% $12,000.00 L Total $49,475.00 +Not: Item 7; calculation is $10,000 X % markup + $10,000 = Total Price Example) $10,000 X 5% = $500 + $10,000 = $10,500 Attachment C: Insurance Requirements I. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY INSURANCE A. Contractor must not commence work under this contract until all insurance required has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Contractor must not allow any subcontractor, to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. B. Contractor must furnish to the City's Risk Manager and Contract Administrator one (1) copy of Certificates of Insurance with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies by endorsement, and a waiver of subrogation endorsement is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with Certificate of Insurance. Project name and/or number must be listed in Description Box of Certificate of Insurance. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -day advance written notice of cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination required on all certificates and policies. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises — Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non -Owned 3. Rented/Leased $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit WORKERS'S COMPENSATION (All States Endorsement if Company is not domiciled in Texas) Employer's Liability Statutory and complies with Part II of this Exhibit. $500,000/$500,000/$500,000 C. In the event of accidents of any kind related to this contract, Contractor must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. II. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Applicable for paid employees, Contractor must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers' compensation coverage provided must be in statutory amounts according to the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation. An All States Endorsement shall be required if Contractor is not domiciled in the State of Texas. B. Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Contractor's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. C. Contractor shall be required to submit renewal certificates of insurance throughout the term of this contract and any extensions within 10 days of the policy expiration dates. All notices under this Exhibit shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 D. Contractor agrees that, with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • List the City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, as additional insureds by endorsement with regard to operations, completed operations, and activities of or on behalf of the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; • Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and • Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any, cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination in coverage and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. E. Within five (5) calendar days of a cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination of coverage, Contractor shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Contractor's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. F. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Contractor's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Contractor to stop work hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. G. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contractor's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this contract. H. It is agreed that Contractor's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this contract. I. It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this contract. 2017 Insurance Requirements Utilities — Sunrise RV Park, Wesley Seale Dam & Rincon Pump Station Electrical Repair Services 01/18/17 cg Risk Management Attachment C: Bond Requirements No bond requirements necessary for this service agreement; section 5. (B) is null for this service agreement. Attachment D: Warranty Requirements No warranty requirements necessary for this service agreement; section 8. Warranty is null for this services agreement. ti ri-fr+ r Lyo(P wi 8026-3/:xy CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 it there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Advantage Electrical Cont. & Maint. Inc. Corpus Christi, TX United States Certificate Number: 2017-197465 Date Filed: 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City Of Corpus Christi Texas 04/24/2017 Date Acknowledged: , 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. RFB/RFP No. 1056 Electrical Repair Services for Sunrise Beach, Rincon Pump Station and Wesley Seale Dam 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling 1 Intermediary 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. o X 6 AFFIDAVIT i swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. ANNETTE CISNEROS My Notary ID # 130821781 Expires April 15, 2020 `/ Signature of authori Oriof contracting business entity AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE Sworn toandsubscribed before me, by the said��Ce6this the Os- day of /, ori / 20 / 7 , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. d5 4 1 ./117e1 41,4111 /2/LA/ &s/2//v 5 ND 14't Signature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer 5d ministering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.883 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 30, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of June 13, 2017 DATE: May 30, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Jim Davis, Director of Fleet Maintenance iimd(a�cctexas.com (361) 826-1909 Jay Ellington, Director of Park and Recreation JayEll(c�cctexas.com 361-826-3042 Clarence Wittwer, Director of Utilities ClarenceW(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-1874 Kim Baker, Assistant Director of Financial Services -Purchasing Division KimB2(a�cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 Purchase of four Kubota RTV 900 Series for Parks and Recreation and Utilities CAPTION: Motion approving the purchase of four Kubota RTV 900 Series from Kubota Tractor Corporation, from Torrance, California, based on the cooperative purchasing agreement with Texas Local Government Purchasing Cooperative, dba BuyBoard for the total amount not to exceed $62,923.16. Funds are budgeted in FY2016-2017. PURPOSE: This item is to approve the purchase of four Kubota RTV 900 Series for Park and Recreation and Utilities Departments. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: All four Kubota RTV 900 Series will be replacements for existing equipment. One will be used by the Water Department at the Wesley Seale Dam, replacing a 14 year old unit. One will be used at the Oso Wastewater Plant replacing a four year old unit. Although the unit is four years old, the unit is heavily corroded due to the location and corrosive nature of the environment at the Oso Plant. The final two will be used by the Park and Recreation Department at North Beach replacing a 12 year old unit and a 10 year old unit which are highly corroded. ALTERNATIVES: No alternatives OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This purchase conforms to the City's purchasing policies and procedures and State statutes regulating procurement. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Fleet Maintenance Services, Park & Recreation, and Utilities FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $292,014.02 $0.00 $292,014.02 Encumbered / Expended Amount $87,886.63 $87,886.63 This item $62,923.16 $0.00 $62,923.16 BALANCE $141,204.23 $0.00 $141,204.23 Fund(s): Water, Wastewater, and General Comments: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Price Sheet CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION BUYER: ROBERTA ORTIZ ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION Kubota RTV 900 Series **Vendor will pay the BuyBoard Fee QTY. 4 UNIT EA PRICE SHEET KUBOTA RTV 900 Series TLGPC BUYBOARD: 447-14 Kubota Tractor Corporation Torrance, California UNIT PRICE EXTENDED PRICE $15,730.79 $62,923.16 $62,923.16 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 30, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of June 13, 2017 DATE: May 30, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Steve Viera, Director of Human Resources SteveV(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-3441 Kim Baker, Assistant Director of Finance — Purchasing Division KimB2(c�cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 Amendment of Subscription Service Licenses for the Human Resources Department - ELearning CAPTION: Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an amendment for the continuation of subscription service licenses with OpenSesame, Inc., of Portland Oregon, based on a sole source for a total amount not -to -exceed $203,400 for the subscription service of three years. Funds are available in the Human Resources FY 2016-2017 budget for the first of three annual expenditures of $67,800. PURPOSE: To provide subscription licenses of OpenSesame Plus annual subscription to a curated offering of 3,500+ courses to be delivered through INFOR Certpoint, Learning Management System and is compatible with and integrated with the ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) software currently being implemented by the City. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The City of Corpus Christi currently offers OpenSesame Plus subscription with a purchase of 3,000 licenses as approved during the pilot program phase started in June 2014. With the success of this pilot, providing the City of Corpus Christi with access to OpenSesame Plus' cost-effective training option will keep our workforce on the latest functionality so they can get the training they need quickly and easily. As soon as INFOR LMS and OpenSesame are implemented and tested compatibility, we will begin offering the access City-wide as part of our goal to provide new employee orientation on -demand and on -demand access to training. ALTERNATIVES: Not applicable. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The proposed purchase confirms with City purchasing policies and procedures. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Human Resources Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $117,000 $135,600 $252,600 Encumbered / Expended Amount $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 This item $67,800 $135,600 $203,400 BALANCE $49,200 $0.00 $49,200 Fund(s): General Fund Comments: Three annual payments of $67,800.00 to be made. The initial payment will be invoiced upon execution. The second and third payments will be invoiced at the one and two year anniversaries of this Sales Order. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this agenda item. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Pricing Sheet Amendment Renewal CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION BUYER: MICHAEL GUTIERREZ ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY QTY PRICE SHEET ELEARNING SUBSCRIPTION ANNUAL PRICE YEARS OpenSesame Portland, OR TOTAL PRICE Curated subscriptions to 3,500+ courses 3,000 $22.60 $67,800.00 3 $203,400.00 Amendment City of Corpus Christi Purchasing Department Date: May 16, 2017 Amendment No. 1 The CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, and OpenSesame, Inc., Portland, Oregon do hereby make and enter into this Amendment which, together with the OpenSesame Sales Order No. Q-00785-1 and all other duly executed Agreements, constitutes the entire agreement under the above -referenced OpenSesame Sales Order between the City of Corpus Christi and the OpenSesame, Inc. 1. This Amendment establishes the Agreement performance dates under OpenSesame Sales Order No. Q-00785-1 as follows; Agreement Performance Dates - 05/30/2017-05/29/2020 2. This Amendment deletes the autorenewal clause under the above -referenced OpenSesame Sales Order. This Agreement does not auto -renew and is revised to read as follows: If you are purchasing an annual or multi-year OpenSesame Plus subscription, the initial term of this Sales Order shall be coextensive with the purchased license term, starting from the date of delivery of course files to Customer, -and -shall -automatically renewfor subsequent 42 month terms. Gustemermay-erminate any subsequent term by reviling day's --written Petise before oemmencement thereof. 3. This Amendment adds a non -appropriation clause to OpenSesame Sales Order No. Q-00785-1 to read as follows: NON -APPROPRIATION The continuation of this Agreement after the close of any fiscal year of the City, which fiscal year ends on September 30 annually, is subject to appropriations and budget approval covering this Agreement as an expenditure in said budget; however, it's within the sole discretion of the City Council of the City to determine whether to fund this Agreement. The City does not represent that this budget item will be adopted, as said determination is within the City Council's sole discretion when adopting each budget. OpenSesame, Inc and the City of Corpus Christi agree to and shall abide by all terms and conditions of the OpenSesame Sales Order No. Q-00785-1, to the extent they are not in conflict with the terms of this Amendment. In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement, its attachments, and exhibits, such conflicts and inconsistencies will be resolved by reference to the documents in the following order of priority: A. this Amendment B. OpenSesame Sales Order No. Q-00785-1 C. Exhibit D. OpenSesame Order No. CCO21215 Toi' Timb4G' Tom Turnbull (May 24, 2017) Tom Turnbull Date Maria Pedraza Date OpenSesame, Inc. Procurement Manager City of Corpus Christi, Texas May 24, 2017 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: Buck Brice Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney (Date) OpenSesame OpenSesame Inc. 1520 NW Davis St, Suite 200, Portlancl, OR 97209 I (503) 808-1268 Sales Order No. Date: Expires on: Q-00785-1 2/8/2017 3/5/2017 Customer / Billing Contact. City of Corpus Christi / Liza Wisner Billing Address: Liza Wisner 1201 Leopard Street #2130 City: Corpus Christi State: TX Zip: 78401 Phone, (361) 826-3336 Email: lizaw@cctexas.com Sales Order Start Date: Sooner of course delivery or 90 days from signature Billing Date: Upon signature OpenSesame Curated subscription to 3,500+ Plus courses. $22.60 3 yrs $67,800.00 $203,400.00 $201400.00 Payment Due: $67,800.00 Three annual payments of $67,800.00 to be made. The initial payment will be invoiced upon execution. The second and third payments will be invoiced at the one and two year anniversaries of this Sales Order. Terms & Conditions PAYMENT TERMS NET 10 FROM DATE OF INVOICE. INVOICE SENT UPON EXECUTION HEREOF. If you are purchasing a Standard License, the term of this Sales Order shall be 12 months from the date of delivery of course files to Customer and shall not auto -renew. If you are purchasing a monthly OpenSesame Plus subscription, the term of this Sales Order shall be monthly and shall automatically renew for subsequent monthly terms. Customer may terminate by providing 30 days' written notice. If you are purchasing an annual or multi-year OpenSesame Plus subscription, the initial term of this Sales Order shall be coextensive with the purchased license term, starting from the date of delivery of course files to Customer, and shall automatically renew for subsequent 12 month terms. Customer may terminate any subsequent term by providing 30 day's written notice before commencement thereof. If you are purchasing a Site License, Pay Per Use program, or OpenSesame Books, then the term of this Sales Order shall be 12 months from the date of delivery of course files to Customer and shall automatically renew for subsequent 12 month terms. Customer may terminate any subsequent term by providing 30 day's written notice before commencement thereof. OpenSesame reserves the right to disable courses and terminate this Sales Order in the event of late payment. This Sales Order is subject to the terms and conditions in Exhibit A. Signature: TO1P. T"'"ZZ Torn Tumbull (Feb 8, 2017) Email: tom.turnbull@opensesame.com VP, Business and Legal Affairs Page 1 of 1 OpenSesame OPENSESAME INC 1520 NW Davis #200, Portland, OR 97209 1 (503) 808-1268 EXHIBIT A Buyer Terms If you purchase courses via OpenSesame from any Seller in the marketplace, you will be responsible to pay the fee associated with such courses and any applicable taxes. You agree to pay for all courses purchased through the OpenSesame system. What You Are Buying When you purchase a course, you are purchasing a non-exclusive license to use that course consistent with the purchased license type. Ownership of all intellectual property rights, including all copyright, trademarks, designs and patents whether registered or unregistered, and all other intellectual property, software and goodwill relating to the course will remain with the Seller. All course seats are sold for single person usage only and not to be broadcast, or otherwise shared. If you choose to load course files in a third party delivery platform, such as a learning management system, it is your duty to load, categorize, and assign courses. OpenSesame's implementation obligations end once such course files are made available for download. You agree not to copy, record, edit or alter or otherwise interfere with the courses provided by the Seller. This shall include without limitation: a) not using recording equipment to record during playback of the courses; b) not overlaying the courses with other audio, video or images or distorting the quality of the training programs; and c) not removing, editing or otherwise interfering with (or attempting to remove, edit or otherwise interfere with) any names, marks, logos or branding on the courses. You agree not to (or attempt to) interfere with or disrupt the proper operation of the Seller's or OpenSesame's software, hardware, systems or networks or courses, including (but not limited to) not knowingly or negligently transmitting files that may interrupt, damage, destroy or limit the functionality of any computer software, hardware, systems or networks, including (without limitation) corrupted files or files that contain viruses, trojans, worms, spyware or other malicious content. You may not use the courses for any purpose other than for the purpose for which it has been provided and you agree not to use the courses for illegal or inappropriate purposes. In particular, you agree that you will not use the courses to do any of the following: a) convey any false, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, abusive, hateful, racial, threatening, harmful, vulgar, obscene, seditious or otherwise objectionable or offensive material of any kind or nature; b) carry out any commercial business, send any unsolicited commercial emails, advertise or offer to sell any goods or services or conduct or forward surveys, contests or chain letters; or c) falsify the origin or source of any content or other material. 77 TT 1 OpenSesame OPENSESAME INC I 520 NW Davis #200, Portland, OR 97209 1 (503) 808-1268 Your right to access and use the courses may not be assigned, transferred or sublicensed by you. Any courses provided at no cost as part of a promotional program or the sales process may be removed or substituted at will. Individual Course Purchase Licenses When you purchase individual courses, or course bundles, users will have twelve (12) months from the date of purchase to access any individual course. Users will thereafter have twelve (12) additional months of access for such course(s). Site License Purchases When you purchase a site license an unlimited number of users, from an individual company (limited to a single Internet domain) may access the course for twelve (12) months from purchase (when the order is completed). Pay Per Use Licenses Courses purchased via a Pay Per User license (available via OpenSesame sales representative only) pay for courses that are accessed by users. Courses are deemed accessed when the greater of more than two (2) minutes or 50% of a course is taken. OpenSesame Plus (Plus) Subscription Licenses Single Plus purchasers may access an unlimited number of courses made available via the Plus subscription while the subscription fee, whether it be monthly or annual, is current. The Plus library is a specific subset of OpenSesame courses and is subject to change from time to time at OpenSesame's discretion. OpenSesame Basics Subscription Licenses OpenSesame Basics is sold on an annual basis, and OpenSesame Basics purchasers may access all OpenSesame Basics courses on an unlimited basis during the annual term. The OpenSesame Basics library is a specific subset of OpenSesame courses and is subject to change from time to time at OpenSesame's discretion. E 2 1 OpenSesame OPENSESAME INC 1 520 NW Davis #200, Portland, OR 97209 1 (503) 808-1268 No Liability OpenSesame, and its Sellers, are not liable for, nor do OpenSesame and its Sellers warrant the courses provided by any Seller via the OpenSesame marketplace. OpenSesame and its Sellers disclaim any and all responsibility or liability for the content, completeness, accuracy, legality, non -infringement, reliability, or availability of information or materials displayed on, or delivered via OpenSesame. You are responsible for conducting your own research before choosing a course. This is the case even in the event that you request assistance from OpenSesame in selecting courses. OpenSesame's cumulative liability for any claim will be limited to the fees received via the sale of courses over the preceding 12 months. Course Substitutions and Refunds OpenSesame retains the right to substitute substantially similar courses for those initially selected as necessary. OpenSesame also reserves the right to remove courses from the OpenSesame marketplace. In the event that a purchased course is removed, OpenSesame shall issue a pro rata refund of the purchase price for such course. OpenSesame generally reserves the right to cancel an order and refund your money for any reason, including the case where course pricing was published in error. Publicity You agree, if requested, to supply your logo for inclusion on the OpenSesame website and printed marketing materials; to provide a customer testimonial for use on the OpenSesame website and printed marketing materials; and to provide such other marketing measures as separately agreed between the parties in writing. 3 r.; OpenSesame OPENSESAME INC 1520 NW Davis #200, Portland, OR 97209 I (503) 808-1268 Order No. CCO21215 Date: 12 February 2015 Customer / Billing Contact: City of Corpus Christi / Liza Wisner Billing Address : 1201 Leopard St, #2130, City Hall, 2nd Floor City: Corpus Christi State: TX Zip: 78401 Phone: 361-239-8760 Email: LizaW@cctexas.com RECURRING CHARGES ITEM DESCRIPTION OpenSesame Plus Annual Subscription to a curated offering of -3.000 courses Payment Method: = Credit Card = ACH = Check START DATE: Upon Course Delivery PRICE QTY TOTAL $24.86 3,000 TOTAL AMOUNT $74,580.00 $74,580.00 CUSTOMER Terms & conditions Ownership of courses will not be transferred to Customer. Customer shall have the right to use the courses consistent with the license purchased for such courses. OpenSesame and its Sellers are not liable nor do OpenSesame and its Sellers warrant the courses provided by any Seller via the OpenSesame �c me -" ;« cdio ,,;«u;,,, anu and all responsibility or eliability, or availability 2015-052 ,penSesame. Customer losing a course. This is 3/24/15 nce from Opensesame M2015-028 OpenSesame Inc. OPENSESAME INC Signature: 741"1--5171/1"‘-r14 -"a =eb2b 20'5` Email: tom.turnbull@opensesame.com VP OpenSesame retains the right to substitute substantially similar courses for those initially selected as necessary. The term of this Sales Order shall be 12 months from the date of delivery of course files to Customer. OpenSesame reserves the right to disable courses and terminate this sales Order in the event of late payment. This Sales Order is subject to the terms and conditions found in exhibit A (Terms and Conditions) and exhibit B (Privacy Policy). INDEXED EXECUTED by the PARTIES, both of which hereby represent that the signatures to this AGREEMENT, below, are of those persons with the capacity and authority to legally bind the PARTIES. CUSTOMER CITY F CORPUS CHRISTI Ronald Olso City Manager Date ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Date 3/15 - APPROVED AS TO FORM: 7A01) 11-1 -Ix Buck Brice Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney (Date) OPENSESAME INC 77.0. a5 Mon -,as _...t_ =EC 25 _J1.^ Tom Turnbull Vice President Feb 25, 2015 Date oto\ 5 ti ZCAUI „uhi. IT COMM TLF- SE_( rAVY Page 2 of 10 Exhibit A Terms and Conditions General Terms Before getting started. please review the following terms. Please note that as a Buyer or Seller of content via the OpenSesame marketplace you must review and agree to separate terms, You will be presented with such terms at the time you either purchase courses or go through the process of adding content for sale via OpenSesame. Assuming you agree to all terms. please acknowledge by accepting below. By agreeing to these terms. Iyou are also agreeing to the OpenSesame Privacy Policy_found in exhibit B. The general terms of service. separate Buyer and Seller terns. and/or the privacy policy can be changed where both parties agree in writing when such terms do not substantially modify the terms of the agreement. Registration You understand and agree to the following: 1. You must use a valid e-mail address and create a username during the registration process. 2. You are responsible for all uses of your account. You must keep your password confidential. We may refuse. at our sole discretion. to allow you to register a usemame that is trademarked. inappropriate. or impersonates another individual. 3. You agree to let OpenSesame immediately know of any unauthorized use of your account. 4. If you are less than 13 years old. you may not use OpenSesame. If you are between 13 and 17 years old. then you must have parental consent to use this service. By registering for OpenSesame. you are indicating that you have the capacity to understand these Tereus of Service. OpenSesame will not be held liable for any loss or damage for non-compliance. 5. You understand and agree that OpenSesame does not control. verify or endorse Courses unless explicitly stated. 6. When registering with OpenSesame. you must provide. and maintain. accurate. current. and complete information about yourself. 7. OpenSesame reserves the right to refuse the service to any user. Deactivation You can deactivate. or terminate. your account at any time and for any reason. OpenSesame can also deactivate. or terminate. your account at any time and for any reason. We also reserve the right to use any Page 3 of 10 Exhibit A means (legal. operational. or technological) available to enforce these terms. Once deactivation occurs. your rights to access the OpenSesame marketplace will cease to exist. Your Warranties You warrant and represent to OpenSesame that you are: 1. Not a minor and you have the legal right and ability to agree to and abide by these terms, or: 2. If you are between the ages of 13 and 17 that you have parental consent and agreement to use the OpenSesame marketplace: 3. You hold and will continue to hold all the ownership. license. proprietary, and other rights necessary to enter into. authorize. grant rights. and perform your obligations under these terms. Other Terms These terms shall be governed in all respects by the laws of the State of Texas. USA. and any disputes arising hereunder shall be submitted to state and federal courts in Nueces County. Texas and you agree to and consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of such courts. If any of these terms are deemed invalid. then the remaining terms shall still be enforced. OpenSesame is not responsible for any delay or failure in performance resulting directly or indirectly from causes beyond OpenSesame's reasonable control. Official correspondence must be sent via email to: info@opensesame.com. If you are not a resident of the United States of America, then you agree to follow all applicable laws and local rules regarding the transmission of data from the United States and the country in which you live. These teams. including Buyer and Seller terms that you may separately agree to as part of registering to do business with OpenSesame, represent the complete. entire, and exclusive understanding and agreement between you and OpenSesame. These terms supersedes all prior. written or oral. understandings or agreements. Bayer Terms If you purchase courses via OpenSesame from any Seller in the marketplace. you will be responsible to pay the fee associated with such courses and any applicable taxes. You agree to pay for all courses purchased through the OpenSesame system. What You Are Buying When you purchase a course. you are purchasing a non-exclusive license to use that course consistent with the purchased license type. Ownership of all intellectual property rights. including all copyright. trademarks. designs and patents whether registered or unregistered. and all other intellectual property. Page 4 of 10 Exhibit A software and goodwill relating to the course will remain with the Seller. All course seats are sold for single person usage only and not to be broadcast. or otherwise shared. You agree not to copy. record. edit or alter or otherwise interfere with the courses provided by the Seller. This shall include without limitation: a) not using recording equipment to record during playback of the courses: b) not overlaying the coarses with other audio. video or images or distorting the quality of the training programmes: and c) not removing. editing or otherwise interfering with (or attempting to remove. edit or otherwise interfere with) any names. marks. logos or branding on the courses. You agree not to (or attempt to) interfere with or disrupt the proper operation of the Seller's or OpenSesame's software, hardware. systems or networks or courses. including (but not limited to) not knowingly or negligently transmitting files that may interrupt. damage. destroy or limit the functionality of any computer software. hardware. systems or networks. including (without limitation) corltpted files or files that contain viruses. trojans. worms. spyware or other malicious content. You may not use the courses for any purpose other than for the purpose for which it has been provided and you agree not to use the courses for illegal or inappropriate purposes. In particular. you agree that you will not use the courses to do any of the following: a) convey any false. unlawful. harassing. defamatory. abusive. hateful. racial. threatening. harmful. vulgar. obscene. seditious or otherwise objectionable or offensive material of any kind or nature: b) carry out any commercial business. send any unsolicited commercial mails. advertise or offer to sell any goods or services or conduct or forward surveys. contests or chain letters: or c) falsify the origin or source of any content or other material. Your right to access and use the courses may not be assigned. transferred or sublicensed by you. Individual Course Purchase Licenses When you purchase individual courses. or course bundles. users will have twelve (12) months from the date of purchase to access any individual course. Users will thereafter have twelve (12) additional months of access for such course(s). Site License Purchases When you purchase a site license an unlimited number of users. from an individual company (limited to a single Internet domain) may access the course for twelve (12) months from purchase (when the order is completed). Pay Per Use Licenses Page 5 of 10 Exhibit A Courses purchased via a Pay Per User license (available via OpenSesame sales representative only) pay for courses that are accessed by users. Courses are deemed accessed when the greater of more than two (2) minutes or SO% of a course is taken. OpenSesame Plus (Plus) Subscription Licenses Single Plus purchasers may access an unlimited number of courses made available via the Plus subscription while the subscription fee. whether it be monthly or annual. is current. The Plus library is a specific subset of OpenSesame courses and is subject to change from time to time at OpenSesame's discretion. No Liability OpenSesame. and its Sellers. are not liable for. nor do OpenSesame and its Sellers warrant the courses provided by any Seller via the OpenSesame marketplace. OpenSesame and its Sellers disclaim any and all responsibility or liability for the content, completeness. accuracy. legality. non -infringement. reliability. or availability of information or materials displayed on. or delivered via OpenSesame. You are responsible for conducting your own research before choosing a course. This is the case even in the event that you request assistance from OpenSesame in selecting courses. OpenSesame's cumulative liability for any claim will be limited to the fees received via the sale of courses over the preceding 12 months. Course Substitutions OpenSesame retains the right to substitute substantially similar courses for those initially selected as necessary. OpenSesame also reserves the right to remove courses from the OpenSesame marketplace. In the event that a purchased course is removed. OpenSesame shall issue a pro rata refund of the purchase price for such course. Page 6 of 10 Exhibit B Privacy Policy OpenSesame Values Your Privacy This Privacy Policy (this "Policy") describes how OpenSesame Inc. ("OpenSesame"). treats information collected from you at the OpenSesame web site (http:liwww.opensesame.com) (the "Site") and how it uses and discloses such information. By accessing the Site. you consent to the collection. use and disclosure of your information in accordance with the terms of this Policy. If you do not wish your information to be collected. used or disclosed in the manners described in this Policy. please do not access the Site or make use of OpenSesame's training services and related goods. OpenSesame may collect two types of information 1. Aggregate Information. For purposes of this Policy. information that is anonymous. aggregate information (such as pages visited on the Site. browser type. referring URL, IP address) will be referred to as "Aggregate Information." Aggregate Information is not connected to you or to any other personally -identifiable information relating to you. 2. Personal Information. For purposes of this Policy. personally -identifiable information that is connected to you or other personally -identifiable information relating to you. including. but not limited to your name. billing address. payment information. home address. electrical license information. telephone number. e-mail address. birth date. or gender. will be referred to as "Personal Information." Children under 13 OpenSesame complies with requirements of the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and the FTC's Rule interpreting COPPA (16 CFR § 512). The Site is not directed to children of any age and OpenSesame does not knowingly collect any Personal Information from children under 13 years in any manner. Use of Information 1. Aggregate Information. OpenSesame uses Aggregate Information only to generate statistical reports. such as reports about the use of the Site. Such reports are used to make the Site better meet your needs or to allow OpenSesame to better conduct its business. Page 7 of 10 Exhibit B 2. Personal Information. OpenSesame uses Personal Information to fulfill your requests for certain products and services: to customize the content you see: and to contact you about specials and new products. OpenSesame reserves the right to use third party providers to assist in providing services such as shipping. credit card processing, and communication regarding OpenSesame's services. When OpenSesame uses third parties such as these. OpenSesanie requires that the third parties comply with this Policy and any other appropriate confidentiality and security measures. OpenSesame may also share Personal Information with third parties in limited circumstances. including when complying with legal process. preventing fraud or inuninent harm. and ensuring the security of OpenSesame's network and services. Disclosures of Information 1. Personal Information. OpenSesame does not sell. rent or share personally -identifiable information to or with any third party not affiliated with or owned by OpenSesame. except that OpenSesame may disclose such information to service providers who may assist OpenSesame in providing services to you or in such areas reporting the completion of certain types of training. OpenSesame will disclose your personal infonnation to third parties when you give us permission to do so. If you create a public profile on OpenSesame. any information you include in that profile will be disclosed publicly. 2. Aggregate Information. Aggregate infon nation is used solely for internal purposes to help OpenSesame improve its users' experience at the Site and to better provide its services to you. 3. Cookies. OpenSesame may use "cookies" to recognize and count new visitors and to acquire Aggregate Information that lets OpenSesame analyze traffic patterns and none the performance and functionality of the Site. A cookie is a file that is placed on your hard drive when you visit a web site. It contains specific information that allows the Site to "recognize" your computer the next time you visit. The most important use for cookies is to eliminate the need for you to re- enter your information every time you visit the Site. Most browsers accept cookies by default. but you can turn off cookies using your browser settings. To learn how, see: for Microsoft Internet Explorer users. www.microsoft.com/infoicookies.htm: for Firefox users. http:// mozilla.gu nears.net/firefox_help_frefox_cookie nrtorial.html. If you turn off cookies. certain Site features may no longer work or may work differently. Please note that when you accept a cookie from the Site. OpenSesame does not gain access to your hard drive or personal information other than the information you have provided to us. OpenSesame does not provide cookie information to any third party. Page 8 of 10 Exhibit B 4. Disclosure as Required by Law. OpenSesame will disclose user Personal Information when required by law or if OpenSesame has a good -faith belief that such action is necessary to comply with a current judicial proceeding. a court order or legal process served on OpenSesame. 5. Business Transition. In the event OpenSesame goes through a business transition. such as a merger. acquisition by another company or a sale of a portion of OpenSesame's assets. our customers' Personal Information may be part of the assets transferred. Disclosure of users' Personal Information in such a situation. or in contemplation of such a situation, shall be deemed consistent with this Policy. However. such a transfer may result in a change in this Policy, and you are advised and strongly encouraged to review this Policy frequently. Links The Site contains or may contain links to other web sites. OpenSesame is not responsible for the privacy practices or content of these other web sites. This Policy applies solely to information collected by the Site. OpenSesame encourages you to be aware when you leave the Site and to read the privacy statements of each and every web site that collects Personally Information. Security OpenSesame takes commercially -reasonable precautions to protect your information. However. given the nature of the Internet and the fact that network security measures are not infallible. OpenSesame cannot guarantee the security of Personal Information submitted through the Site. OpenSesame also makes an off-line effort to protect your Personal Information. OpenSesame makes conunercially-reasonable efforts to restrict access to Personal Information to employees who need the information to perform a specific job. OpenSesame maintains conunercially-reasonable physical, electronic and managerial procedures to safeguard the Personal Information OpenSesame collects. Contacting, Updating and Opting Out You may use the contact information provided below to request a change in your Personal Information (such as address correction) or to have your Personal Information removed from OpenSesame's database. OpenSesame will correct. update. or remove your Personal Information according to your request. You may also use the contact information below if you have any questions. continents or complaints about this Policy or your dealings with the Site. OpenSesame infoCOpenSesame.com 2828 SW Corbett Ave.. Suite 135. Portland. OR 97201 United States of America (503) 808-1268 U.S. - EU Safe Harbor Privacy Statement Page 9 of 10 Exhibit B OpenSesame complies with the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework and the U.S.-Swiss Safe Harbor Framework as set forth by the U.S. Department of Commerce regarding the collection. use. and retention of personal information from European Union member countries and Switzerland. OpenSesame has certified that it adheres to the Safe Harbor Privacy Principles of notice. choice. onward transfer. security. data integrity. access. and enforcement. To learn more about the Safe Harbor program. and to view OpenSesame's certification. please visit http://www.export.gov/safeharbor/ In compliance with the US -EU and US -Swiss Safe Harbor Principles. OpenSesame commits to resolve complaints about your privacy and our collection or use of your personal information. European Union or Swiss citizens with inquiries or complaints regarding this privacy policy should first contact OpenSesame at info@OpenSesame.com 2828 SW Corbett Ave.. Suite 135. Portland. OR 97201 United States of America (503) 808-1268. OpenSesame has further committed to refer unresolved privacy complaints under the US -EU and US - Swiss Safe Harbor Principles to an independent dispute resolution mechanism. the BBB EU SAFE HARBOR operated by the Council of Better Business Bureaus. If you do not receive timely acknowledgment of your complaint. or if your complaint is not satisfactorily addressed by OpenSesame. please visit the BBB EU SAFE HARBOR web site at www.bbb.org/us/safe-harbor-complaints for more information and to file a complaint. Policy Changes OpenSesame reserves the right to make. at its sole discretion. any changes. modifications. additions or deletions to all or portions of this Policy at any time. OpenSesame recommends that you review this Policy frequently. If OpenSesame makes a material change to this Policy. OpenSesame will notify you by standard mail or e-mail. or by clear notice on OpenSesame's home page. The changes will not be effective against you until the notice has been provided and you have assented to the change through continued use of the Site. Traveling Beyond the OpenSesame Internet Portal As a trade -specific portal. this Site provides you with a doorway to the Internet. When you travel beyond this Site. OpenSesame advises you to browse carefully. This Policy does not apply to the practices of companies that OpenSesame does not own or control. or to people that OpenSesame does not employ or manage. OpenSesame recommends that you read the Federal Trade Commission reports and discussions regarding privacy and security located at: http://www.ftc,gov/bcp/menus/consumer/tech/privacy.shtm Page 10 of 10 Notarize ID: P39ZR4NX Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.883 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2017-197568 Date Filed: 04/24/2017 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. OpenSesame Inc. Portland, OR United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. Q-00785-1 Elearning courses 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary NONE AT ALL. NONE NONE NONE 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. X \\\\\\\\111111/I/// 6 AFFIDAVIT_ �\\o� vp,,ZJINgF j p Y p l y �� � � i I swear, or affirm, under enalt of er ur that the above disclosure is true and correct. Y �\ ,�.0SAR/Z�. i 2 • _ ° ill :W 2: r D = .i.4 : .< --• grAidop,441 ti,. 100,06pae �+,o \ esNaN.e a36°01. QJ O Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity , this the 24th day of April , C N O i AFFIX NOTARY STAivi `DEAL ABOVE State of Virginia; County of Campbell Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said Thomas Turnbull 20 17 , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. D Finley Electronic Notary Public \ 11 Pleuni Clazina Signature officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.883 AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of May 30, 2017 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of June 13, 2017 DATE: May 5, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Daniel McGinn, AICP, CFM, Assistant Director of Planning and ESI DanielMc@cctexas.com (361) 826-7011 Ordinance Amending the Unified Development Code. Adding a Non -Voting Ex -Officio Navy Representative to the Planning Commission CAPTION: Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code by adding a non-voting ex- officio xofficio Navy representative to the Planning Commission; providing for severance; providing for penalty; providing for publication; and effective date. PURPOSE: The NAS Corpus Christi Joint Land Use Study, adopted by City Council in 2013 as an element of the City's Comprehensive Plan, included a high priority recommendation to add a non-voting ex -officio Navy Representative to the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The Naval Air Station (NAS) Corpus Christi Joint Land Use Study recommended the addition of the Navy representative to the Planning Commission since the Planning Commission makes recommendations on zoning and final decisions on subdivisions that could greatly impact compatibility of development near Navy facilities. Having a representative on the Planning Commission will help ensure that there are clear and on- going communications with the City and the Navy concerning development decisions. While the City Charter, Chapter 5. Planning states that the Planning Commission shall have nine members, the Charter does not address or specifically forbid the establishment of non- voting ex -officio members. ALTERNATIVES: Not approve the proposed ordinance adding a non-voting Navy representative to the Planning Commission. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Compatible land use next to military facilities has become a key factor in evaluating military bases for expansion or closure in recent years. Establishment of a standing representative of the Navy on the Planning Commission will strengthen the City's commitment to compatible land use on property near the three Navy airports in Corpus Christi and Corpus Christi International Airport. The establishment of a Navy representative on the Planning Commission will help to institutionalize a permanent and direct line of communication between the Navy and decision makers on land development in the City. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The proposed ordinance conforms to adopted City policy in the NAS Corpus Christi Joint Land Use Study under the High Priority, Recommended Communications Strategy COM - 1 B: Develop a process to include an ex -officio representative of NASCC to participate on the city's Planning Commission. This process should allow for military review and comment on development applications and permits for locations within the MCA Overlay Subzones to assure the city is aware of any impacts that the development may have on military training and operations. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Planning and ESI, Legal, Development Services, Intergovernmental Affairs Planning Commission — recommended approval on May 3, 2017 FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None. RECOMMENDATION: Approval. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Presentation ORDINANCE amending the Unified Development Code by adding a non-voting ex -officio Navy representative to the Planning Commission; providing for severance; providing for penalty; providing for publication; and effective date. WHEREAS, on September 23, 2013, the City Council adopted the Naval Air Station Corpus Christi ("NASCC") Joint Land Use Study ("JLUS") as an element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. WHEREAS, the JLUS recommends as a high priority Communications Strategy COM -1 B to Develop a process to include an ex -officio representative of NASCC to participate on the city's Planning Commission. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended the City Council approve this amendment of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas ("City") Unified Development Code ("UDC"); WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, public hearings were held on Wednesday, May 3, 2017, during a meeting of the Planning Commission, and on Tuesday, May 30th, 2017, during a meeting of the City Council, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, in the City of Corpus Christi, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve public health, necessity, and convenience and the general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Article 2, Section 2.3, subsection 2.3.2 entitled "Establishment, Membership and Procedure" of the UDC is amended by adding the following language that is underlined (added) and deleting the language that is stricken (deleted) as delineated below: 2.3.2. Establishment, Membership and Procedure A. Information regarding the establishment, membership, and rules of procedure of the Planning Commission is available in the City Charter and the Municipal Code. B. Each member of the Planning Commission shall be required to undergo training provided by the City prior to serving on the Commission or at the beginning of service on the Commission. In addition, the entire Commission shall undergo training every two years. C. All recommendations by the Planning Commission shall require an affirmative vote by a majority of the members present and voting, except as otherwise required in this Unified Development Code or by Texas law. D. Recognizing the importance of Naval Air Station Corpus Christi to the community and the region, and to ensure that actions taken by the Planning Commission and recommendations provided to City Council by the Planning Commission contain input from the U.S. Navy, where appropriate, a non-voting ex -officio representative of the U.S. Navy is added to the Planning Commission. SECTION 2. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, such judgment shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this Ordinance, for it is the definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this Ordinance be given full force and effect for its purpose. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each section, paragraph, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or provision thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, paragraphs, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, words, or provisions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 3. A violation of this ordinance, or requirements implemented under this ordinance, constitutes an offense punishable as provided in Article 1, Section 1.10.1 of the UDC, Article 10 of the UDC, and Section 1-6 of the Corpus Christi Code of Ordinances. SECTION 4. Publication shall be made in the City's official publication as required by the City's Charter. SECTION 5. This ordinance is effective immediately upon passage. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Council Member That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Council Member PASSED AND APPROVED on this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta Joe McComb City Secretary Mayor Non -Voting Ex -Officio Navy Representative to the Planning Commission City Council Presentation May 30, 2017 Purpose Implement NAS Corpus Christi Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) • JLUS = collaborative planning effort led by the City of Corpus Christi, in partnership with NASCC and Nueces County. • JLUS = effort to guide planning and development in the areas surrounding NASCC's Truax Field, Cabaniss Field, Waldron Field, and Corpus Christi International Airport (CCIA). • The overarching purpose of the JLUS planning process is to identify compatible land uses and growth management guidelines within, and proximate to, active military Installations. *On September 23, 2013, the City Council adopted the NAS Corpus Christi Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) as an element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. JLUS Strategy i ir 16 a 4g A c5 JLU amig Y 1 - a. 1 p� gI fv "-- 8ig 1 yg �yj �j 1 O§ O F R i i g 3 Z �3 1 i COMMUNICATIONS COM -1 Issue: Effective regional planning would benefit tom formalized in er-agency communication and coordination agreements that are inclusive of all relevant stakeholders and agencies, including the military. COM -1A Comm MCA Establish a JLUS Coordinating Committee for the purposes of implementing the JLUS. The City should organize a committee of all relevant stakeholder; who will be invcived in the recemmendaions. • • ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 D ❑ Q i 1B Comm MCA develop a process to include an ex -officio representative of NASCC to participate on the city's Planning Commission. This process should allow for military review and comment on development applications and permits for locations within the MCA Overlay Suluones to assure the city is aware of any impacts that the development may have on nulirary training and operations. • ■ ❑ MCA= Military Compatibility Area, used when a strategy applies to all four airfields Timeline = :1 to 2 years Recommendation Staff recommends approval of proposed ordinance adding a non-voting ex -officio Navy Representative to the Planning Commission. AGENDA MEMORANDUM Public Hearing and First Reading for the City Council Meeting of June 13, 2017 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of June 20, 2017 DATE: May 23, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Julio Dimas, CFM, Interim Director, Development Services Department JulioD@cctexas.com (361) 826-3276 Rezoning property located at 4540 Tribble Lane CAPTION: Case No. 0517-03 Magellan Terminal Holdings, LP.: A change of zoning from the "CG - 1" General Commercial District to the "IH" Heavy Industrial District. The property is described as Webb Tract Port View 101.58 acres, located along the west side of Poth Lane, south of Tribble Lane, and north of Interstate 37. PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to rezone the property to allow for above ground fuel tanks. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (May 17, 2017): Approval of the change of zoning from "CG -1" General Commercial District to the "IH" Heavy Industrial District. Vote Results: For: 8 Against: 0 Absent: 0 Abstained: 1 BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: As detailed in the attached report, the applicant is requesting a rezoning from the "CG - 1" General Commercial District to the "IH" Heavy Industrial District to allow for above ground fuel tanks. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Plan CC Comprehensive Plan. The proposed rezoning is also compatible the Westside Area Development Plan, with neighboring properties, and with the general character of the surrounding area. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Deny the request. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not Applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Westside Area Development Plan and is planned heavy industrial uses including the wholesale storage of petroleum products. The proposed rezoning to the "IH" Heavy Industrial District is consistent with the adopted Future Land Use Map and the Westside Area Development Plan. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal and Planning Commission FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital • •Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016- 2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Presentation - Aerial Map Planning Commission Final Report Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), upon application by Magellan Terminal Holdings, LP. ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to Webb Tract Port View 101.58 acres, from the "CG -1" General Commercial District to the "IH" Heavy Industrial District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its final report and recommendation regarding the application of Magellan Terminal Holdings, LP. ("Owner"), for an amendment to the City of Corpus Christi's Unified Development Code ("UDC") and corresponding UDC Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, a public hearing was held on Wednesday, May 17, 2017, during a meeting of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the change of zoning from the "CG -1" General Commercial District to the "IH" Heavy Industrial District, and on Tuesday, June 13, 2017, during a meeting of the City Council, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve the public health, necessity, convenience and general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Upon application made by Magellan Terminal Holdings, LP. ("Owner"), the Unified Development Code ("UDC") of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas ("City"), is amended by changing the zoning on Webb Tract Port View 101.58 acres, located along the west side of Poth Lane, south of Tribble Lane, and north of Interstate 37 (the "Property"), from the "CG -1" General Commercial District to the "IH" Heavy Industrial District (Zoning Map No. 049045), as shown in Exhibit A, which is a map of the property, is attached to and incorporated in this ordinance by reference as if fully set out herein in its entirety. SECTION 2. The official UDC Zoning Map of the City is amended to reflect changes made to the UDC by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 3. The UDC and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City, made effective July 1, 2011, and as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance, both remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. To the extent this amendment to the UDC represents a deviation from the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the UDC, as it is amended by this ordinance. SECTION 5. All ordinances or parts of ordinances specifically pertaining to the zoning of the Property and that are in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 6. Publication shall be made in the City's official publication as required by the City's Charter. K:\DevelopmentSvcs\SHARED\ZONING CASES\2017\0517-03 Magellan Terminal Holdings, LP\Council Documents\Ordinance_0517-03_Magellan Terminal Holdings, LP..docx Page 2 of 3 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Council Member That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Council Member PASSED AND APPROVED on this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta Joe McComb City Secretary Mayor K:\DevelopmentSvcs\SHARED\ZONING CASES\2017\0517-03 Magellan Terminal Holdings, LP\Council Documents\Ordinance_0517-03_Magellan Terminal Holdings, LP..docx Page 3 of 3 IH IH 37 ACCESS RD NB CN -1 G-2 ° 400 UP RIVER TO IH 37 RAMP SB IH 37 FWYSB 800 IH 37 ACCESS RD SB I r Date Created: 5/1/2017 Prepared By: JeremyM Department of Development Services CASE: 0517-03 ZONING & NOTICE AREA RM -1 Multifamily 1 RM -2 Multifamily 2 RM -3 Multifamily 3 ON Professional Office RM -AT Multifamily AT CN -1 Neighborhood Commercial CN -2 Neighborhood Commercial CR -1 CR -2 CG -1 CG -2 CI CBD CR -3 FR H BP Resort Commercial Resort Commercial General Commercial General Commercial Intensive Commercial Downtown Commercial Resort Commercial Farm Rural Historic Overlay Business Park IL Light Industrial IH Heavy Industrial PUD Planned Unit Dev. Overlay RS -10 Single -Family 10 RS -6 Single -Family 6 RS -4.5 Single -Family 4.5 RS -TF Two -Family RS -15 Single -Family 15 RE Residential Estate RS-TH Townhouse SP Special Permit RV Recreational Vehicle Park RMH Manufactured Home Subject Property O Owners with 200' buffer in favor 4 Owners within 200' listed on v Owners attached ownership table A in opposition SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION MAP1 101 City of Corpus Christi Aerial Overview Subject Property at 4540 Tribble Lane N PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL REPORT Case No. 0517-03 Infor No. 17ZN1013 Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 17, 2017 Applicant & Legal Description Applicant/Owner: Magellan Terminal Holdings, L.P. Representatives: Brian Mayfield Location Address: 4540 Tribble Lane Legal Description/Location: Webb Tract Port View 101.58 acres, located along the west side of Poth Lane, south of Tribble Lane, and north of Interstate 37. Zoning Request From: "CG -1" General Commercial District To: "IH" Heavy Industrial District Area: 22.83 acres Purpose of Request: To allow above ground fuel tanks. Existing Zoning and Land Uses Existing Zoning District Existing Land Use Future Land Use Site "CG -1" General Commercial Heavy Industrial and Light Industrial Heavy Industrial and Light Industrial North "IH" Heavy Industrial Heavy Industrial Heavy Industrial South "RS -6" Single Family 6 and "ON" Neighborhood Office Vacant Light Industrial East Outsid(OCL) City Limits Vacant Light Industrial West Outsid(OCL) City Limits Heavy Industrial Heavy Industrial ADP, Map & Violations Area Development Plan: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Westside Area Development Plan and is planned heavy industrial uses including the wholesale storage of petroleum products. The proposed rezoning to the "IH" Heavy Industrial District is consistent with the adopted Future Land Use Map and the Westside Area Development Plan. Map No.: 049045 Zoning Violations: None Transportation Transportation and Circulation: The subject property has approximately 765 feet of frontage along Poth Lane and 1,424 feet of frontage along Tribble Lane. The Urban Transportation Plan designates both as local streets. The subject property is located on the west side of Poth Lane approximately 150 feet north of IH 37 Access Road Staff Report Page 2 Street R.O.W. Street Urban Transportation Plan Type Proposed Section Existing Section Traffic Volume Poth Lane Local Residential 50' ROW 28' paved 40' ROW 26' paved N/A Tribble Lane Local Residential 50' ROW 28' paved 20' ROW 20' paved N/A Staff Summary: Requested Zoning: The applicant is requesting a rezoning from the "CG -1" General Commercial to the "IH" Heavy Industrial District to allow for wholesale storage tanks for petroleum products. Development Plan: The subject property is comprised of 23.83 acres acres and is proposed to be site of wholesale storage tanks for petroleum products. Existing Land Uses & Zoning: The subject property is currently zoned "CG -1" General Commercial and has a heavy industrial use of large above ground storage tanks. The current use of above ground storage tanks extends to the north which is zoned "IH". Properties to the north were annexed into the City in 1995 and were originally zoned as a combination of the "CG -1" General Commercial District (Formerly B-3) and the "IL" Light Industrial District (Formerly I-2). Furthermore, the properties to the north were rezoned to "IH" Heavy Industrial District in 2004. The properties to the east and west are Outside City Limits (OCL) and are designated as part of Industrial District #1. AICUZ: The subject property is not located in one of the Navy's Air Installation Compatibility Use Zones (AICUZ). PIanCC & Area Development Plan Consistency: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Westside Area Development Plan (ADP). The proposed rezoning to the "IH" Heavy Industrial District is consistent with the Westside ADP and the adopted Future Land Use Plan's designation of the property as heavy industrial. Additionally, the following are pertinent elements of the Comprehensive Plan and should be considered: • Promote a balanced mix of land uses to accommodate continuous growth and promote the proper location of land uses based on compatibility, locational needs, and characteristics of each use (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 1). • Encourage orderly growth of new residential, commercial, and industrial areas. (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 1). • The City should evaluate zoning districts where existing zoning should be changed to implement the Land Use Plan (Policy Statement C.3). • Industrial properties should be required to minimize undesirable "spillover effects" into residential and commercial areas (this includes noise, air pollution, negligent visual blight, etc.) by means of property layout -out and organization of Staff Report Page 3 activities by screening and maintaining buffer areas or zones for their activities (Policy Statement C.6). Department Comments: • The proposed rezoning is compatible with PIanCC and the Westside Area Development Plan. The proposed rezoning is not compatible with neighboring properties and with the general character of the surrounding area. However, as mentioned in the following comments, the adjacent single-family residences no longer exist. • The business of the subject property is the leasing of space for the wholesale storage of diesel, gasoline, and other petroleum based products within permanently installed above ground tanks. • The storage tanks on-site have existed in their current size and configuration since at least 1985. • Aerial photos suggest storage tanks have existed on-site since at least 1956. • The area within where the Subject Property is located was annexed in 1995 and zoned "CG -1" General Commercial District (Formerly B-3). The "CG -1" District was granted due to the adjacency of the single-family homes of Country Club Place. The properties that constitute the single-family home to the south were annexed in 1954. Specific mention of non -conforming uses was included in the staff report in 1995. The purpose of the "CG -1" District was to create a zoning buffer/transition area and prevent the expansion of above ground tanks due to the threat of potential ground contamination and its effects on the adjacent residences. At the time, it was mentioned that the tanks would be removed over time. However, operations have not ceased and the adjacent single-family homes no longer exist. • A property adjacent to the south also owned by the applicant was recently rezoned in 2015 to "ON" Neighborhood Office District to accommodate an administrative office building. Properties also to the south were recently rezoned in 2016 to "IL" Light Industrial District. • According to the Texas Railroad Commission, there are existing pipelines that convey pressurized liquid combustibles that border and cross through the Subject Property. Pipelines also cross the adjacent properties to the south. • There are remaining adjacent properties to the south that retain the "RS -6" Single - Family 6 District. These properties consist of former single-family homes that have slowly vacated the area over time since the early 1990s. Today, no single-family homes remain. Additionally, as mentioned above, there are pressurized pipelines that cross through these properties, therefore no single-family homes will return. • However, due to the "RS -6" District properties, buffer yards will be required. The buffer yard requirement between properties zoned "IH" Heavy Industrial and properties zoned "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District is a Type E buffer yard. According the Unified Development Code (UDC), the Type E buffer yard requires 25 feet and 50 points. • The Subject Property has an existing berm of earth/concrete of approximately 12-15 feet in height. The berm will be extended if and when additional fuel storage tanks are located on-site. • The subject property is located within the city limits and therefore is required to meet the standards of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). In the case of Staff Report Page 4 emergency, the Corpus Christi Fire Department (CCFD) would be the responding party. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (May 17, 2017): Approval of the change of zoning from "CG -1" General Commercial District to the "IH" Heavy Industrial District. Vote Results: For: 8 Opposed: 0 Absent: 0 Abstained: 1 Public Notification Number of Notices Mailed — 26 within 200 -foot notification area 5 outside notification area As of May 12, 2017: In Favor — 0 inside notification area — 0 outside notification area In Opposition — 0 inside notification area — 0 outside notification area Totaling 0.00% of the land within the 200 -foot notification area in opposition. Attachments: 1. Location Map (Existing Zoning & Notice Area) 2. Public Comments Received (if any) K:\DevelopmentSvcs\SHARED\ZONING CASES \2017\0517-03 Magellan Terminal Holdings, LP\Council Documents\CC Report_0517-03_Magellan Terminal Holdings LP..docx IH IH 37 ACCESS RD NB CN -1 G-2 ° 400 UP RIVER TO IH 37 RAMP SB IH 37 FWYSB 800 IH 37 ACCESS RD SB I r Date Created: 5/1/2017 Prepared By: JeremyM Department of Development Services CASE: 0517-03 ZONING & NOTICE AREA RM -1 Multifamily 1 RM -2 Multifamily 2 RM -3 Multifamily 3 ON Professional Office RM -AT Multifamily AT CN -1 Neighborhood Commercial CN -2 Neighborhood Commercial CR -1 CR -2 CG -1 CG -2 CI CBD CR -3 FR H BP Resort Commercial Resort Commercial General Commercial General Commercial Intensive Commercial Downtown Commercial Resort Commercial Farm Rural Historic Overlay Business Park IL Light Industrial IH Heavy Industrial PUD Planned Unit Dev. Overlay RS -10 Single -Family 10 RS -6 Single -Family 6 RS -4.5 Single -Family 4.5 RS -TF Two -Family RS -15 Single -Family 15 RE Residential Estate RS-TH Townhouse SP Special Permit RV Recreational Vehicle Park RMH Manufactured Home Subject Property O Owners with 200' buffer in favor 4 Owners within 200' listed on v Owners attached ownership table A in opposition SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION MAP1 101 City of Corpus Christi AGENDA MEMORANDUM Public Hearing and First Reading for the City Council Meeting of June 13, 2017 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of June 20, 2017 DATE: May 23, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Julio Dimas, CFM, Interim Director, Development Services Department JulioD@cctexas.com (361) 826-3276 Rezoning property located at 2121 Rand Morgan Road CAPTION: Case No. 0517-04 MPM Development, LP: A change of zoning from the "RS -6" Single - Family 6 District to the "RS -4.5" Single -Family 4.5 District. The property is described as being a Roberts Tract 2.064 acres out of Lots 3, 6, 11, 14 and 15 also known as Tract 1F, Roberts Tract 31.119 acres out of Lots 3, 6, and 11, and Roberts Tract 6.517 acres out of Lots 3, 6, 11, and 14, and Roberts Tract 4.391 acres out of Lots 3, 6, 11, 14 and 15 also known as Tract 1F, located along the west side of Rand Morgan Road, south of Leopard Street, and north of Oregon Trail. PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to rezone the property to allow for the construction of single- family homes on approximately 167 lots ranging from 5,500 to 10,000 square foot lots. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (May 17, 2017): Approval of the change of zoning from "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District to the "RS -4.5" Single -Family 4.5 District. Vote Results: For: 9 Against: 0 Absent: 0 Abstained: 0 BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: As detailed in the attached report, the applicant is requesting a rezoning from the "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District to the "RS -4.5" Single -Family 4.5 District to allow for the construction of single-family homes. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Plan CC Comprehensive Plan. The proposed rezoning is also compatible the Northwest Area Development Plan, with neighboring properties, and with the general character of the surrounding area. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Deny the request. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Not Applicable CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Northwest Area Development Plan and is planned for medium density residential uses. The proposed rezoning to the "RS -4.5" Single -Family 4.5 is consistent with the adopted Future Land Use Map and the Northwest Area Development Plan. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal and Planning Commission FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital • •Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016- 2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance Presentation - Aerial Map Planning Commission Final Report Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), upon application by MPM Development, LP. ("Owner"), by changing the UDC Zoning Map in reference to Roberts Tract 2.064 acres out of Lots 3, 6, 11, 14 and 15 also known as Tract 1F, Roberts Tract 31.119 acres out of Lots 3, 6, and 11, and Roberts Tract 6.517 acres out of Lots 3, 6, 11, and 14, and Roberts Tract 4.391 acres out of Lots 3, 6, 11, 14 and 15 also known as Tract 1F, from the "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District to the "RS -4.5" Single -Family 4.5 District; amending the Comprehensive Plan to account for any deviations; and providing for a repealer clause and publication. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council its final report and recommendation regarding the application of MPM Development, LP. ("Owner"), for an amendment to the City of Corpus Christi's Unified Development Code ("UDC") and corresponding UDC Zoning Map; WHEREAS, with proper notice to the public, a public hearing was held on Wednesday, May 17, 2017, during a meeting of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the change of zoning from the "RS -6" Single - Family 6 District to the "RS -4.5" Single -Family 4.5 District, and on Tuesday, June 13, 2017, during a meeting of the City Council, during which all interested persons were allowed to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this amendment would best serve the public health, necessity, convenience and general welfare of the City of Corpus Christi and its citizens. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Upon application made by MPM Development, LP. ("Owner"), the Unified Development Code ("UDC") of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas ("City"), is amended by changing the zoning on Roberts Tract 2.064 acres out of Lots 3, 6, 11, 14 and 15 also known as Tract 1F, Roberts Tract 31.119 acres out of Lots 3, 6, and 11, and Roberts Tract 6.517 acres out of Lots 3, 6, 11, and 14, and Roberts Tract 4.391 acres out of Lots 3, 6, 11, 14 and 15 also known as Tract 1F, located along the west side of Rand Morgan Road, south of Leopard Street, and north of Oregon Trail. (the "Property"), from the "RS - 6" Single -Family 6 District to the "RS -4.5" Single -Family 4.5 District (Zoning Map No. 059047), as shown in Exhibit "A", which is a metes and bounds description of the Property, and Exhibit "B", which is a location map to accompany the metes and bounds, are attached to and incorporated in this ordinance by reference as if fully set out herein in their entities. SECTION 2. The official UDC Zoning Map of the City is amended to reflect changes made to the UDC by Section 1 of this ordinance. SECTION 3. The UDC and corresponding UDC Zoning Map of the City, made effective July 1, 2011, and as amended from time to time, except as changed by this ordinance, both remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. To the extent this amendment to the UDC represents a deviation from the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to conform to the UDC, as it is amended by this ordinance. SECTION 5. All ordinances or parts of ordinances specifically pertaining to the zoning of the Property and that are in conflict with this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed. SECTION 6. Publication shall be made in the City's official publication as required by the City's Charter. K:\DevelopmentSvcs\SHARED\ZONING CASES\2017\0517-04 MPM Development, LP\Council Documents\Ordinance_0517- 04MPM Develoment, LP..docx Page 2 of 3 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Council Member That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Council Member PASSED AND APPROVED on this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta Joe McComb City Secretary Mayor K:\DevelopmentSvcs\SHARED\ZONING CASES\2017\0517-04 MPM Development, LP\Council Documents\Ordinance_0517- 04MPM Develoment, LP..docx Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT "A" Description of a 42.398 acre tract of land, more or less, a portion of Lots 3, 6, 11 and 14, Artemus Roberts Subdivision, a map of which is recorded in Volume 3, Page 41, Map Records, Nueces County, Texas, and consisting of all of a 6.517 acre tract of land and all of a 31.119 acre tract of land, both as described by deed recorded as Document No. 2007024157, Official Records of said county, a portion of a drainage easement/right-of-way described by deed recorded as Document No. 2003045766, said Official records, a portion of a 6.455 acre tract of land described as Tract IF in deed, Document No. 2001043336, said official records and a portion of a 42.806 acre tract of land described by deed as Document No. 2004009258, said official records, said 42.398 acre tract of land as further described by metes and bounds as follows, all iron rods described below as being set contain plastic caps labeled "Bass and Welsh Engineering"; BEGINNING at a west right-of-way corner of Rand Morgan Road which bears N89° 12'33 "E 20.00' from the northeast corner of Lot 11, Block 1, Northwest Crossing Unit 1, a map of which is recorded in Volume 62, Pages 1 and 2, said map records, said beginning point for the southeast corner of the tract herein described; THENCE S89°12'33"W 1100.00' along the south boundary line of a 100' wide portion of said drainage easement/right- of-way and being along the north boundary line of said Northwest Crossing Unit 1 and along the north boundary line of Northwest Crossing Unit 3, a map of which is recorded in Volume 63, Pages 53 and 54, said Map records and along a north boundary line of Northwest Crossing Unit 5, a map of which is recorded in Volume 66, Pages 67 and 68, said Map records, to a point occupied by a fence for central interior corner of the tract herein described and northwest corner of Lot 86, Block 1, said Northwest Crossing Unit 5; THENCE along the west boundary line of said Lot 86, Block 1, Northwest Crossing Unit 5, S00°47'27"E 61.50' to a to point occupied by a fence for central corner of the tract herein described and northeast corner of Lot 107, said Block 1, Northwest Crossing Unit 5; THENCE S89°12'33"W 270.00' along a north boundary line of said Northwest Crossing Unit 5 to a to point occupied by a fence for central corner of the tract herein described and northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 6, said Northwest Crossing Unit 5; THENCE N00°47'27"W 61.50' along the east boundary line of Lot 22, Block 6, Northwest Crossing Unit 6, a map of which is recorded in Volume 66, Pages 150 and 151, said map records, to a 5/8" iron rod with plastic cap labeled "Urban Engineering" found for interior central corner of the tract herein described and northeast corner of said Lot 22, Block 6, Northwest Crossing Unit 6; THENCE S89°12'33"W 540.00' along said south boundary line of 100' wide portion of drainage easement/right- of-way, being along the north boundary line of said Northwest Crossing Unit 6 and along the north boundary line of Northwest Crossing Unit 7, a map of which is recorded in Volume 68, Pages 282 and 283, said Map records, to a 5/8" iron rod with plastic cap labeled "Brister Surveying" found for the southernmost west corner of the tract herein described and northwest corner of Lot 49, Block 6, said Northwest Crossing Unit 7; THENCE N00°47'27"W 100.00' across said 100' wide portion of drainage easement/right-of-way to a 5/8" iron rod set in the north boundary line of said 100' wide drainage easement/right-of-way for a southwest interior corner of the tract herein described and southwesterly corner of said 6.517 acre tract; THENCE S89°12'33"W 120.00' along the southwest boundary line of said 6.517 acre tract and along the north boundary line of said drainage easement/right-of-way to a 5/8" iron rod set for the southwest corner of said 6.517 acre tract and westernmost south corner of the tract herein described; THENCE N00°47'27"W 660.00' along the west boundary line of said 6.517 acre tract of land to a 5/8" iron rod set at the point of curvature of a circular curve to the right having a central angle of 90°00'00", a radius of 150.00' and a chord a bearing N44° 12'33 "E a distance of 212.13'; THENCE along the arc of said circular curve to the right, being along a northwest boundary line of said 6.517 acre tract, a distance of 235.62' to a 5/8" iron rod set at the point of tangency; THENCE N89°12'33"E 1879.52' along the north boundary line of said 6.517 acre tract of land to a 5/8" iron rod set in the west right-of-way line of said Rand Morgan Road for the northeast corner of the tract herein described; THENCE S00°49' 15"E 910.00' along said west right-of-way line of Rand Morgan Road, being along a line 40.00' west of and parallel to the centerline of said Rand Morgan Road, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. r=1RS T TITLE COMPANY 54021-101W Road Suite 2202 TX 79411 Corpus Christi, (361) 9 3-2033 GF # 45 0 CG -2 ■ 32 80 47„ „81 ,^7 60h 71_ /_1h 12R S 2 79 Cs 0 61 76 �'5N 51 6O�40„ it15N 52 0 352 0 .on 0 5d 826 832 36� 16 m 38 28 14:4 ct �a C° 13,a 2 rdM 2 T3 !4sM $05 —800 RF se t Nair 85 N -5 O RS -6 M'1 1 1 to IL 68 �G'G 69 44 67 57 23 L66 11 70 78 70/ FR Date Created: 4/27/2017 Prepared By: IvetteM Department of -I ev'opment Services CASE: 0517-04 ZONING & NOTICE AREA RM -1 Multifamily 1 RM -2 Multifamily 2 RM -3 Multifamily 3 ON Professional Office RM -AT Multifamily AT CN -1 Neighborhood Commercial CN -2 Neighborhood Commercial CR -1 CR -2 CG -1 CG -2 CI CBD CR -3 FR H BP Resort Commercial Resort Commercial General Commercial General Commercial Intensive Commercial Downtown Commercial Resort Commercial Farm Rural Historic Overlay Business Park IL Light Industrial IH Heavy Industrial PUD Planned Unit Dev. Overlay RS -10 Single -Family 10 RS -6 Single -Family 6 RS -4.5 Single -Family 4.5 RS -TF Two -Family RS -15 Single -Family 15 RE Residential Estate RS-TH Townhouse SP Special Permit RV Recreational Vehicle Park RMH Manufactured Home Subject Property O Owners with 200' buffer in favor 4 Owners within 200' listed on v Owners attached ownership table A in opposition SUBJECT PROPERTY Ir I Corpus Christi Bay �l W N LOCATION MAP LL City of Corpus Christi Aerial Overview Subject Property at 2121 Rand Morgan Road N PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL REPORT Case No. 0517-04 INFOR No. 17ZN1015 Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 17, 2017 Applicant & Legal Description Owner: MPM Development, LP. Applicant/Representative: MPM Development, LP. Location Address: 2121 Rand Morgan Road Legal Description: Roberts Tract 2.064 acres out of Lots 3, 6, 11, 14 and 15 also known as Tract 1 F, Roberts Tract 31.119 acres out of Lots 3, 6, and 11, and Roberts Tract 6.517 acres out of Lots 3, 6, 11, and 14, and Roberts Tract 4.391 acres out of Lots 3, 6, 11, 14 and 15 also known as Tract 1F, located along the west side of Rand Morgan Road, south of Leopard Street, and north of Oregon Trail. Zoning Request From: "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District To: "RS -4.5" Single -Family 4.5 District Area: 42.398 acres Purpose of Request: To allow for the construction of single-family homes on approximately 167 lots ranging from 5,500 to 10,000 square foot lots. Existing Zoning and Land Uses Existing Zoning District ExistU eland Future Land Use Site "RS -6" Single -Family 6 Vacant Medium Density Residential North "RS -6" Single -Family 6 Vacant Medium Density Residential South "RS -4.5" Single -Family 4.5 Drainage Corridor and RS -4.5 Single- Family 4.5 Drainage Corridor and Medium Density Residential East "RS -6" Single -Family 6 Mobile home and low density residential Medium Density Residential West "RS -6" Single -Family 6 Vacant Medium Density Residential ADP, Map & Violations Area Development Plan: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Northwest Area Development Plan and is planned for medium density residential uses. The proposed rezoning to the "RS -4.5" Single -Family 4.5 is consistent with the adopted Future Land Use Map and the Northwest Area Development Plan. Map No.: 059047 Zoning Violations: None Staff Report Page 2 Transportation Transportation and Circulation: The subject property has approximately 900 feet of street frontage along Rand Morgan Road which is designated as an "A2" Secondary Arterial Street Divided. § 1- •O L Street Urban Transportation Plan Type Proposed Section Existing Section Traffic Volume Rand Morgan Road "A2" Secondary Arterial Divided 100' ROW 54' paved 90' ROW 20' paved 7,451 ADT (2015) Staff Summary: Requested Zoning: The applicant is requesting a rezoning from the "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District to the "RS -4.5" Single -Family 4.5 District to allow for the construction of single- family homes on 167 single-family residential lots ranging in size from 5,500 to 10,000 square feet. Development Plan: The subject property is comprised of 42.398 acres and is proposed to be subdivided into167 lots for single-family homes. At present time, the applicant is working to close a portion of the existing drainage easement along the southern property line. Existing Land Uses & Zoning: The subject property is currently zoned "RS -6" Single - Family 6 District and is vacant land. To the north and west is vacant land zoned "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District. Approximately 100 feet north of the subject property is vacant land zoned "CG -2" General Commercial District. To the east are a few properties zoned "CG -2" General Commercial District. Also to the east are properties zoned "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District comprised of single-family residences along Rand Morgan Road and a mobile home park with approximately 55 mobile homes. To the south is a single- family subdivision of about 450 residences zoned "RS -4.5" Single -Family 4.5 District. Included within this subdivision is the Tuloso-Midway Intermediate School. AICUZ: The subject property is not located in one of the Navy's Air Installation Compatibility Use Zones (AICUZ). Plat Status: The property is not platted. PIanCC & Area Development Plan Consistency: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Northwest Area Development Plan (ADP). The proposed rezoning to the "RS -4.5" Single -Family 4.5 District is consistent with the adopted Northwest ADP. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the following policies of the Comprehensive Plan: Staff Report Page 3 • Encourage the protection and enhancement of residential neighborhoods (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 1). • Promote a balanced mix of land uses to accommodate continuous growth and promote the proper location of land uses based on compatibility, locational needs, and characteristics of each use (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 1). • Encourage orderly growth of new residential, commercial, and industrial areas. (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 1). • Encourage residential infill development on vacant lots within or adjacent to existing neighborhoods (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 3). • Encourage convenient access from medium -density residential development to arterial roads (Future Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Design Policy Statement 3). • The City Council, hereby, adopts the Northwest Future Land Use Plan (Figure 6) and the accompanying text as a guide for future land use decisions. Department Comments: • The proposed rezoning is compatible with PIanCC and the Northwest Area Development Plan. The proposed rezoning is also compatible with neighboring properties and with the general character of the surrounding area. Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation (May 17, 2017): Approval of the change of zoning from "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District to the "RS -4.5" Single -Family 4.5 District. Vote Results: For: 9 Opposed: 0 Absent: 0 Public Notification Number of Notices Mailed — 86 within 200 -foot notification area 6 outside notification area As of May 12, 2017: In Favor — 1 inside notification area — 0 outside notification area In Opposition — 0 inside notification area — 0 outside notification area Totaling 0.00% of the land within the 200 -foot notification area in opposition. Attachments: 1. Location Map (Existing Zoning & Notice Area) 2. Public Comments Received (if any) K:\DevelopmentSvcs\SHARED\ZONING CASES\2017\0517-04 MPM Development, LP\Council Documents\CC Report_0517-04_MPM Development LP..docx 45 0 CG -2 ■ 32 80 47„ „81 ,^7 60h 71_ /_1h 12R S 2 79 Cs 0 61 76 �'5N 51 6O�40„ it15N 52 0 352 0 .on 0 5d 826 832 36� 16 m 38 28 14:4 ct �a C° 13,a 2 rdM 2 T3 !4sM $05 —800 RF se t Nair 85 N -5 O RS -6 M'1 1 1 to IL 68 �G'G 69 44 67 57 23 L66 11 70 78 70/ FR Date Created: 4/27/2017 Prepared By: IvetteM Department of -I ev'opment Services CASE: 0517-04 ZONING & NOTICE AREA RM -1 Multifamily 1 RM -2 Multifamily 2 RM -3 Multifamily 3 ON Professional Office RM -AT Multifamily AT CN -1 Neighborhood Commercial CN -2 Neighborhood Commercial CR -1 CR -2 CG -1 CG -2 CI CBD CR -3 FR H BP Resort Commercial Resort Commercial General Commercial General Commercial Intensive Commercial Downtown Commercial Resort Commercial Farm Rural Historic Overlay Business Park IL Light Industrial IH Heavy Industrial PUD Planned Unit Dev. Overlay RS -10 Single -Family 10 RS -6 Single -Family 6 RS -4.5 Single -Family 4.5 RS -TF Two -Family RS -15 Single -Family 15 RE Residential Estate RS-TH Townhouse SP Special Permit RV Recreational Vehicle Park RMH Manufactured Home Subject Property O Owners with 200' buffer in favor 4 Owners within 200' listed on v Owners attached ownership table A in opposition SUBJECT PROPERTY Ir I Corpus Christi Bay �l W N LOCATION MAP LL City of Corpus Christi Persons with disabilities planning to attend this meeting, who may require special services, are requested to contact the Development Services Department at least 48 hours in advance at (361) 826-3240. Personas con incapacidades, que tienen la intencion de asistir a este junta v cue requieren servicios especiales, se les suplica clue den aviso 48 horas antes de la junta Ilamando al deaartamento de servicios de desarrollo, al numero (361 ) 826-3240. If you wish to address the Commission during the meeting and your English is limited, please call the Development Services Department at (361) 826-3240 at least 48 hours in advance to request an interpreter be present during the meeting. Si usted desea diriQirse a la commission durante la iunta v su Ingles es limitado, favor de Hamar al departamento de servicios de desarrollo al numero (361 t 826-3240 al menos 48 horas antes de la Junta para solicitar un interprete ser preSen dur?rite la junta. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Rezoning Case No. 0517-04 MPM Development, LP. has petitioned the City of Corpus Christi to consider a change of zoning from the "RS -6" Single -Family 6 District to the "RS -4.5" Single -Family 4.5 Districttnot resulting in a change to the Future Land Use Map. The property to be rezoned is described as: Roberts Tract 2.064 acres out of Lots 3, 6, 11,14 and 15 also known as Tract 1 F, Roberts Tract 31.119 acres out of Lots 3, 6, and 11, and Roberts Tract 6.517 acres out of Lots 3, 6, 11, and 14, located along the west side of Rand Morgan Road, south of Leopard Street, and north of Oregon Trail. The Planning Commission may recommend to City Council approval or denial, or approval of an intermediate zoning classification and/or Special Permit. Approval of a change of zoning, if inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, will also have the effect of amending the Comprehensive Plan to reflect the approved zoning. The Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing for this rezoning request to discuss and formulate a recommendation to the City Council. The public hearing will be held on Wednesday, May 17, 2017, during one of the Planning Commission's regular meetings, which begins at 5:30 p.m.. in the City Council Chambers, 1201 Leopard Street. You are invited to attend this public hearing to express your views on this rezoning request. For more information, please call (361) 826-3240. TO BE ON RECORD, THIS FORM MUST BE FILLED OUT, SIGNED BY THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER(S) AND MAILED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, P. O. BOX 9277, CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78469- 9277. ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED BELOW BECOMES PUBLIC RECORD. NOTE: In accordance with the Planning Commission By -Laws, no discussion shall be -held -611a member or members of this Commission with an applicant or appellant concerning an application or appeal, either at home or office, or in person, by telephone call or by letter. Printed Name: A Address: 2.O' -f- ! Sar^ f o u1 Tr - (1C)„ IN FAVOR ( ) IN OPPOSITION REASON: SEE MAP ON REVERSE SIDE INFOR Case No.. 17ZN1015 Property Owner ID: 3 rd City/State: t? Phone: 3 Lai — L8-4 54 Signature Case No. 0517-04 Project Manager: Andrew Dimas Email. AndrewD2@cctexas.com 1. i(it11�1�I��r��l{�11{�Ir�+ftt��tlttl�llt�ll�]Il�ttl�f111���tltt City of Corpus Christi Development Services Dept. P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469 3 578300060250 BRESLEY ALLEN AND WFE CATHY BRESLEY 2041 BARLOW TRL CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410 U,' LPOSTAGE>)etTNEYBOWES ZFP 78412 $ 000.460 02 4Y4 000034061716AY 05 2017 rA jariMWreeirAIIIIIMMIIIIM Merle 2 Lan ,anI— numm ixo-me/ r'.erz /// # /17/1 / Zit 7/71/ /77 '7,//V CG_2 1 v ; et, e I i OREGON TRL CASE: 0517-04 SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH ZONING Subject Properly 0111•1 Multifamily 1 RM ] a.nd.mly $ RAW abu1111muy 3 ON Prale..lonM CIM. R1M6T M.Rdamly AT CN. 1 R.1pn0RRhaed Cemm.rc4 CN 1 N4lehb..lwed Conm.ra4 CR I Mort CemmrrcNl CR -S R.1ort Cefemerc4l CC 1 Genre Contemn/al COQ General cmime lcAi C! Inur.Ivr Cemm.ra41 CCC Downtown Comm.rc41 CR .7 R....t Comm.,. .l FR roan Rural M Hklonc Dnr4y BP Busies. Part L Lightmdu.l.41 al Heavy IndulWial P UB reread !inn Der new 4T RS ft Single Family 'D O 7.0 E1rgl.-F.mly 1 O 7.41 0094 01111117 4 1 R. -• Two.t Emmy O 5 11 Sap4.F.mity 11 RE Re. wm4l Estate RS.TH To.nha.- SF IPea"m Perfekt Ry Recreational W • {.. Part emu menu..ewmd Nome _41 1s u m_. MI RS -6 Ate 11 N FL w Oiyl�.p.roi RIPIRTM! FR AI et SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION MAP] City of ColPels Christi AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Agenda Item for the City Council Meeting of May 23, 2017 Regular Agenda Item for the City Council Meeting of June 13, 2017 DATE: TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager May 9, 2017 FROM: Alyssa M. Barrera, Business Liaison AlyssaB©cctexas.com (361) 826-3356 E. Jay Ellington, Director of Parks and Recreation JayEll@cctexas.com (361) 826-3042 Resolution to support Downtown Management District's application for the Texas Commission on the Arts Cultural District Designation CAPTION: Resolution supporting the Downtown Management District's application for the designation of a Cultural District and authorizing the certification of a Cultural District to be named Downtown Corpus Christi Cultural District for at least ten (10) years. PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to support the Downtown Management District (DMD) in their application to the Texas Commission on the Arts (TCA) Main Street Program (TMSP). BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: As authorized by H.B. 2208 of the 79th Legislature, the Texas Commission on the Arts (TCA) can designate cultural districts in cities across Texas. Cultural districts are special zones that harness the power of cultural resources to stimulate economic development and community revitalization. These districts can become focal points for generating businesses, attracting tourists, stimulating cultural development and fostering civic pride. Goals of Cultural District Program TCA recognizes that a thriving creative sector is a powerful economic development asset. Cultural district development is one strategy that helps a community boost their economies while realizing other cultural and civic benefits. The outcomes of cultural districts extend beyond the arts and benefit all members of a community. • Attracting artists and cultural enterprises to the community. • Encouraging business and job development. • Address specific needs of a community. • Establishing tourism destinations. • Preserving and reusing historic buildings. • Enhancing property values. • Fostering local cultural development. ALTERNATIVES: The alternative is not to support the DMD's Application. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: N/A CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: N/A EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: This is a routing, non -controversial item. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: N/A FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital X Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: By supporting this Resolution, the City is not obligated for any finances beyond what is budgeted annually for the DMD Interlocal Agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Resolution. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution — Downtown Corpus Christi Cultural District Texas Cultural District Program Overview RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE DOWNTOWN MANAGEMENT DISTRICT'S APPLICATION FOR THE DESIGNATION OF A CULTURAL DISTRICT AND AUTHORIZING THE CERTIFICATION OF A CULTURAL DISTRICT TO BE NAMED DOWNTOWN CORPUS CHRISTI CULTURAL DISTRICT FOR AT LEAST TEN (10) YEARS. WHEREAS, The Downtown Management District (DMD) Board passed a resolution on May 18, 2017, in support of a cultural district, to be named Downtown Corpus Christi Cultural District, which will assist the district and community to develop a public-private partnership to support said district; WHEREAS, The Texas Commission on the Arts will be petitioned to designate said cultural district; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to support the DMD's application for the designation of said cultural district and authorize certification of the cultural district for at least ten years. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: Being in the public interest of the City of Corpus Christi to support the development and diversification of the economy of this City as will be accomplished by the designation of the Downtown Corpus Christi Cultural District, the City agrees and authorizes SECTION 1. That the City of Corpus Christi endorses the submission of the DMD's application and agrees to participate in the development and financial support of said cultural district; SECTION 2. That the City of Corpus Christi endorses the goal of economic development of said cultural district within the context of preservation and rehabilitation of our historic buildings; SECTION 3. That the City of Corpus Christi endorses the goal of tourism development of said cultural district within the context of contributing to the overall visitor development goals of the City; SECTION 4. That the City of Corpus Christi will appoint a city official to represent the City on the steering committee of said cultural district; SECTION 5. That, by this action, the City Council directs City staff to actively support and cooperate with governing board to develop and maintain said cultural district; SECTION 6. That, by this action, the City Council requests all residents of the City and especially those citizens who own property or businesses within said cultural district to support, promote, and help maintain activities and events in said district; and SECTION 7. That the City of Corpus Christi authorizes the certification of a cultural district to be named Downtown Corpus Christi Cultural District to continue for at least ten years. ATTEST: THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta Joe McComb City Secretary Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas of The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Joe McComb Rudy Garza Paulette Guaj ardo Michael Hunter Ben Molina Lucy Rubio Greg Smith Carolyn Vaughn Council Member DOWNTOWN MANAGEMENT DISTRICT C O R P lP S CHRISTI Texas Cultural District Program Overview As authorized by H.B. 2208 of the 79th Legislature, the Texas Commission on the Arts (TCA) can designate cultural districts in cities across Texas. Cultural districts are special zones that harness the power of cultural resources to stimulate economic development and community revitalization. These districts can become focal points for generating businesses, attracting tourists, stimulating cultural development and fostering civic pride. Goals of Cultural District Program TCA recognizes that a thriving creative sector is a powerful economic development asset. Cultural district development is one strategy that helps a community boost their economies while realizing other cultural and civic benefits. The outcomes of cultural districts extend beyond the arts and benefit all members of a community. • Attracting artists and cultural enterprises to the community. • Encouraging business and job development. • Address specific needs of a community. • Establishing tourism destinations. • Preserving and reusing historic buildings. • Enhancing property values. • Fostering local cultural development. Downtown Corpus Christi Cultural District The Downtown Corpus Christi Cultural District is the civic, corporate and cultural hub of the city. It is bounded by Corpus Christi Bayfront on the east. It is bounded by Furman Ave. on the south, and Tancahua St. on the west traveling northward to the Ship Channel. In addition, it is bounded by St. Rd. 181 north across the Harbor Bridge to Timon Ave. on North Beach. The Cultural District includes a number of successful Downtown neighborhoods that are a short walk or 5 -minute drive from each other including: • Water's Edge (Bayshore Park) • Marina Arts District • Uptown • SEA District • North Beach Benefits to Downtown Corpus Christi • Bring prestige to Corpus Christi and Downtown and highlight the compelling collection of arts and cultural attractions Downtown has to offer visitors and residents. • Help the Downtown community to focus messaging and develop strategic marketing partnerships that promote the critical mass of cultural offerings in a walkable, pedestrian -friendly environment. • Obtain buy in and focus funding from City and County leaders, not -for profits and private funders to support making Downtown a vibrant cultural center and significant economic generator. • Assist with attracting new businesses, development projects, and artists. • Grow tourism and increase sales and HOT funds leading to significant economic growth and increased employment in the cultural and hospitality sectors. MARINA MANAGED BY CORPUS CHRISTI DOWNTOWN MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ARTS DISTRICT 223 N Chaparral St., STE A Corpus Christi, TX 78401 P: 361-882-2363 I F: 361-884-9591 marinaarts.com AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 30, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of June 13, 2017 DATE: May 30, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Jim Davis, Director of Fleet Maintenance jimd@cctexas.com (361) 826-1909 Lawrence Mikolajczyk, Director of Solid Waste Operations LawM@cctexas.com (361) 826-1972 Kim Baker, Assistant Director of Financial Services -Purchasing Division KimB2@cctexas.com (361) 826-3169 Lease -Purchase of One Peterbilt 320 Chassis with Roll -Off and Three Peterbilt 367 Transfer Tractors for the Solid Waste Operations Department CAPTION: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to lease -purchase one Peterbilt 320 chassis, with a roll -off and three Peterbilt 367 transfer tractors from Rush Truck Centers of Texas, L.P., of Houston, Texas, based on the cooperative purchasing agreement with Houston -Galveston Area Council, for a total amount not to exceed $799,455 of which $13,274 is budgeted in General Fund for FY2016-17. Remaining payments will be requested in future years during the normal budget process. PURPOSE: This item is to approve the lease -purchase of one Peterbilt 320 chassis, with a roll -off and three Peterbilt 367 transfer tractors for the Solid Waste Operations Department. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Roll -off trucks haul waste to the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill on a daily basis. The truck will haul large containers which roll on and off its chassis via a cable hauling system. This roll -off truck is replacing an existing roll -off truck that is 10 years old with 13,650 hours. Tractor trucks are used to haul large trailers that contain refuse from the transfer station to the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill. They are used on a daily basis, and because of the short run between the transfer station and the Cefe Valenzuela Landfill, they do not accumulate many miles. However, they are operating virtually constantly and the hours on the machines accumulate rapidly. The first tractor to be replaced has 10,000 hours and ten years' service. The second tractor to be replaced has 10,179 hours and ten years' service. The third tractor to be replaced has 13,700 hours and ten years' service. The current tractor trucks have been used extensively and the three intended replacements will allow us to continue this important solid waste service. The purchase of three tractor trucks for the Solid Waste Department is intended to replace three aging tractor trucks that are well past their service lives. ALTERNATIVES: Not applicable. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Financing for the lease -purchase of the Peterbilt 320 truck with roll -off and the three Peterbilt 367 transfer tractors is based on a sixty -month term with an estimated interest rate of 3.75% for an annual estimated payment of $159,291. The total estimated cost over the five-year period, including estimated principal of $725,210 and estimated interest of $71,245 is $796,455. A not to exceed tolerance of $3,000.00 has been added to the interest amount to allow for the possible fluctuation of the interest rate for a total not to exceed of $799,455. Total Lease -Purchase: Total Allowable Interest for Lease: Grand Total: $725,210.00 $74,245.00 $799,455.00 CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This lease -purchase conforms to the City's purchasing policies and procedures and State statutes regulating procurement. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Solid Waste Operations FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $550,193.12 $786,181.00 $1,336,374.12 Encumbered / Expended Amount $521,307.24 $0.00 $521,307.24 This item $13,274.00 $786,181.00 $799,455.00 BALANCE $15,611.88 $0.00 $15,611.88 Fund(s): General Comments: Delivery of the Peterbilt 320 roll -off truck and the three Peterbilt 367 transfer tractors are not scheduled during FY2016-2017. However, one payment of $13,274 is funded in FY2016-17. The annual estimated payment for the lease -purchases is $159,291 which will be requested in future years during the normal budget process by the Solid Waste Operations Department. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the motion as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Price Sheet Informal Staff Report — Fleet Replacement Program Informal Staff Report — Ten Year Fleet Replacement Plan CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI PURCHASING DIVISION BUYER: ROBERTA ORTIZ ITEM 1. 2. DESCRIPTION Peterbilt 320 Truck with Galbreth 75K Roll -Off Peterbilt 367 Transfer Tractor Lease -Purchase Cost: **Vendor will pay the H -GAC Fee PRICE SHEET PETERBILT 320 WITH ROLL -OFF PETERBILT 367 TRANSFER TRACTOR H -GAC HT06-16 Rush Truck Centers of Texas, L.P. Houston, Texas UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE 1 EA $209,327.00 3 EA $171,961.00 Total Lease -Purchase Cost: $725,210.00 Total Estimated Allowable Interest for Lease: $74,245.00 Grand Total: $799,455.00 EXTENDED PRICE $209,327.00 $515,883.00 $725,210.00 INFORMAL STAFF REPORT MEMORANDUM To: Margie Rose, City Manager Through: Sylvia Carrillo -Trevino, Assistant City Manage From: Jim Davis, Director Fleet Maintenance pi Date: 5/25/2017 Subject: Fleet Replacement Program Issue/Problem Purchasing procedures for the acquisition of rolling stock for the City of Corpus Christi are complex, expensive, and must be accomplished with extreme care. The attached report is a discussion that addresses procedures and acquisition methods to ensure timely and effective fleet replacement. Background & Findings The Fleet Replacement Program was created in conjunction with Mercury Associates, Inc. We asked Mercury to generate a study addressing fleet replacement procedures. This was accomplished in conjunction with this Department and the result is in the attached report. .The City of Corpus Christi Fleet Replacement Program envisions a planned vehicle/equipment replacement cycle executed in consonance with the City's Annual Budget. The Fleet Replacement Program will take its direction from and have as its basis the ongoing ten year vehicle replacement plan maintained by Fleet Maintenance. The ultimate goal of the Fleet Replacement Program is to permit Departments to plan, program and budget vehicle replacements annually in a systematic manner based primarily on the Service Life of the vehicle. Conclusion The City has several options regarding vehicle/equipment purchasing. These options are Outright Cash Purchase, Lease Purchase Financing and use of the Sinking Fund (Future Fund). Which method is used depends upon the circumstances extant surrounding the purchase of equipment. The attached report provides a more detailed analysis. Fleet Replacement Program (discussion) Vehicles should be replaced in accordance with the economic theory of optimal vehicle replacement. That is, as a vehicle ages, its capital cost (value) depreciates and its operating costs increase. The combination of these two costs produces a U-shaped total cost curve as seen below. Ideally, a vehicle or piece of equipment should be replaced around the time the rise in annual operating costs begin to outweigh the decline in annual capital costs, i.e., when the two cost curves intersect and the total cost curve begins to turn upward. Economic Theory of Vehicle Replacement TOTAL .�PEP :: IrIG CAPITAL Tonn.r$AG� — L-+rvrst Annual Lest = Ecenomc?opin:6mtnt Poo: The total cost curve is different for every type of vehicle and, indeed, for every individual vehicle of a given type. This variability is caused by differences in the design and engineering of different types of vehicles, in operating environments, in the quality of care vehicles receive, and a variety of other factors. In recognition of this fact, we have developed recommended replacement cycles for both classes and types of vehicles. This is known as "service life" and defines the approximate optimal replacement cycle for most of the units in our fleet. Our service life data was derived from industry standards for virtually all our vehicles. Principles of Effective Fleet Replacement: The key components of an effective fleet replacement program are: 1. Empirically validated vehicle replacement cycle guidelines (published vehicle service life information) that identify when specific types of fleet assets generally should be replaced in order to minimize their life cycle costs (i.e. total cost of ownership). 2. A long term fleet replacement plan (ten year plan) that pinpoints anticipated replacement dates and costs of individual assets based on the application of recommended replacement cycles and quantifies year-to-year, fleet wide replacement costs and future variations therein 3, A capital financing approach that facilitates securing sufficient funds each year to acquire replacement vehicles in accordance with the established and updated replacement plan by making such funding requirements smooth, predictable, and, to the fullest extent possible, invulnerable to competition from other capital funding requests. 4. A short-term replacement prioritization and earmarking process for designating specific vehicles and pieces of equipment to be replaced in the coming fiscal year. Below is a budgeting and funding process discussion that will assist our organization in securing the amount of funds needed each year to execute the replacement plan based on a selected financing approach: This City uses the following methods for financing fleet capital costs: • Outright purchase with cash from appropriations; • Outright purchase with cash accumulated in a Sinking Fund (Future Fund); • Lease purchase financing. An overview of each of these financing methods is detailed below, to include the associated "Advantages" and "Disadvantages". Outright Cash Purchase Using annual, appropriations of cash is a "pay before you go" approach. By this, we mean that the entire capital cost of each asset in the fleet is paid at the beginning of the asset's service life. Advantages • This is an approach that is widely used in the public sector; therefore it is generally accepted in all branches of govemment and by the public. • There is no out-of-pocket interest expense. Disadvantages • It is difficult — usually impossible — to accommodate the annual fluctuations in replacement funding requirements and capabilities that are typical of almost all fleets. • The use of this financing approach almost always leads to sub -optimal replacement decision making. If the marginal cost of replacing a vehicle is the full purchase price of a new vehicle, repairing an old vehicle will always appear to be cheaper than replacing it. • Continually deferring the replacement of vehicles results In an old fleet whose direct total cost of ownership is higher than necessary and whose deteriorating safety, availability, and reliability affect the cost, productivity and safety of operations supported by the fleet. • Continually deferring the replacement of vehicles results in large replacement cost backlogs that become increasingly difficult to overcome and manage. Sinking Fund (Future Fund) Although replacement spending requirements under a sinking fund approach are similar to those required if lease purchase financing is used, replacement funding requirements are different. This is because using a sinking fund permits vehicles' capital costs to be paid for incrementally (after a vehicle is first added to the fleet; the first-time purchase of a vehicle must be paid up front under this financing approach). That is, each year users are charged for a portion of the vehicle's replacement cost (i.e. depreciation plus a replacement surcharge) and this is put into "savings" to pay for the replacement vehicle when the time comes (service life is expired). Fleet users are charged a monthly capital replacement rate to fund the eventual replacement of each vehicle in the fleet. Additions to the fleet (e.g., Police Department adds another patrol vehicle) will be purchased with funds from outside the Future Fund. This Department maintains and administers this City's sinking fund. It should be pointed out that Future Fund purchases are always outright purchases and do not involve lease purchase financing, that is, the incremental payments have already been made. Advantages • Funding requirements do not fluctuate significantly from year to year because using a sinking fund permits the capital costs of vehicles to be paid for incrementally. • Sinking funds are often less of an annual target for decision makers who sometimes equate requests for capital appropriations with discretionary or quasi -discretionary spending needs. • Payment of regular charges for the use of each vehicle in the fleet encourages fleet user organizations to pay attention to the vehicle type and utilization levels. (In contrast to the cash financing approach where this cost is "hidden" for end users). Disadvantages • Requires rigorous and administratively complex fund management procedures, including proper development and execution of charge -back rates, to ensure reserve fund inflows and balances are sufficient to meet replacement spending outflows and schedules. • The cash in the sinking fund to purchase replacement vehicles is subject to being "raided" (or simply not used, usually out of an overabundance of caution) when budget dollars get tight. • Sinking funds are prohibitively expensive to establish where no fleet currently exists or if there already is a large backlog of fleet replacement needs. This is because a large amount of cash must be deposited in the fund up -front, or internal lease rates must be set artificially high to generate the working capital needed by the fund to start paying for the purchase of replacement vehicles. Fleet growth (additions to meet service demands) may also produce similar needs for up -front capital. Despite the negatives cited above, sinking funds are superior to the cash approach in terms of sustaining replacement programs in the public sector and they work well for many govemment jurisdictions. Lease Purchase Financing Like a sinking fund, lease purchase financing allows organizations to spread the capital costs of fleet replacement purchases over the service lives of the vehicles in the fleet. However, rather than accumulating cash in a sinking fund to pay for replacement vehicle purchases, this approach involves borrowing money from a financial institution and repaying it after vehicles have been placed in service. This pay-as-you-go approach frees up cash to meet other needs and eliminates the need to develop a fleet -replacement reserve fund. While spending requirements may vary, lease purchase financing makes year-to-year funding requirements predictable by spreading the capital cost of each asset in the fleet over its useful life or match the financing to the terms of the loan. It also eliminates most of the year-to-year volatility in replacement funding requirements. As a result, the likelihood that fleet replacement spending will be subordinated to other priorities and needs, particularly during lean budget years, is dramatically reduced. Advantages • As with a sinking fund, lease purchase financing allows organizations to spread out the capital costs of fleet replacement purchases over the terms of the loan (usually five years). This eliminates most of the year-to-year volatility in replacement funding requirements, and reduces the likelihood that fleet replacement spending will be subordinated to other priorities and needs, particularly during lean budget years. • Allows the cost of money (i.e., interest charges) to be passed on appropriately to all programs. • If loan or lease payments are made by fleet user agencies directly or via an internal cost charge -back system, greater attention to vehicle selection and utilization will occur. • Provides flexibility to respond to programs' needs for additional vehicles without requirement of up front capital. • Moves the financing of fleet vehicles into the business arena and out of the political arena where fleet replacement must compete with other priorities for capital funds. Disadvantages • One of the perceived drawbacks of lease purchase financing is the cost of borrowing money; i.e., real or imputed interest charges. There is no question that interest charges increase the total capital cost of a vehicle. However, to the extent that lease purchase financing enables an organization to replace vehicles that it otherwise would keep in service for excessive periods of time, interest payments actually result in lower vehicle life -cycle costs. • Another perceived drawback involves ownership of the vehicle. With some debt instruments, clear title to the vehicle does not occur until the loan has been paid off. In practical application, there is no disadvantage to this. Holding the title does not provide any operational advantage. Lease purchase financing is starting to appear more and more in the public sector, and offers a promising alternative for jurisdictions that have the ability to incur long term debt for this purpose. Given the current economic climate and the value of timely vehicle replacement, we believe that for many public -sector jurisdictions lease purchase financing will continue to grow, and become the generally accepted and preferred mechanism to finance vehicle replacement. \\---.... 1852 INFORMAL STAFF REPORT MEMORANDUM To: Margie C. Rose, City Manager 7< Thru: Sylvia Carrillo -Trevino, Assistant City Manage"( From: Jim Davis, Director of Fleet Maintenance Date: June 2, 2017 Subject: Ten Year Fleet Replacement Plan Issue/ Problem On Tuesday, May 30,2017. Councilmember Guajardo asked for the basis of the Ten -Year Fleet Replacement Plan. The information and associated attachments are presented below. Background & Findings The Fleet Replacement Plan is a data driven plan and constitutes the informational basis for the Fleet Replacement Program. The data within the Plan is constantly evolving, and is resident in Fleet's M5 Maintenance Management System. At this point, the Plan is addressing Department vehicle/equipment acquisitions for Fiscal Year 2018. As can be seen from the attached data, summarized by fund, the first year shows those vehicles that need replacement have a collective value of approximately $80 million, of which $42 million resides in the General Fund and consists of ambulances, fire trucks, police vehicles and other big ticket items. We understand the concept of sticker shock here and recognize that the purchase of a brand-new fleet is unrealistic. To smooth or spread the data, or expense, over future years, an average of $23.5 million is needed per year to bring the City's fleet up to zero vehicles past their service life in ten years. Individual vehicle performance, maintenance, a Department's available funds, and purchase options are considered when making the final replacement decisions each budget year. We have also averaged out the ten-year costs of total fleet modernization and they are depicted on the data summary sheet (attached). The key to this program is the using Department's evaluation of the data presented and their subsequent evaluation of what is critical to replacement and associated costs. The data gives the Departments a starting point. It should also be pointed out, in many instances, service lives are exceeded and equipment is successfully and safely operated past their service lives. At the current rate, however, with past and current funding available, we can maintain the Fleet at 45% vehicles past their service life level Conclusion The goal is the optimal purchase of vehicles and equipment given the financial posture of a using Department. The Fleet Replacement Program accomplishes this and uses as its basis the Ten -Year Fleet Replacement Program. The program experiences constant updating and data evolution fed from various sources. It is the primary tool we use to formulate our plan for vehicle/equipment acquisition. Fleet - 10 Year Replacement Program Ten Year Total {+F 0 ri 0 rn C T r1 M1 00 Tr 0 1.4 'a cus n =1 N N w 1- r: n 0 4i n ri n 0' w '0 0 n 0 Tra w 0 0 '0 w O M1 r n w n 1- rl CI w co 0 w V'1 M1 n 40 n M n r w 90 90 r• -•h 1I w a 0 N n 40 w 40 ` 1171 N N 0 N O N 111 n Cr. N N 00' OO N N ' N ' N 00 m N GI N CO 117 N n N N m N N 1a M N N f0 11-7m w 0 7 C N N ' O N N n E0 m N N N N ' N 04 vs N 03 0 ti .y N N 0s est 7 M 01 m 0' N 10 144 in 10 N Qm O 01 m n m ✓ l 7 N N ' CO .-11 01 7 N N N 7 w N t0 14. n 40 N N 111 10 t0 N Ti? VII OD N N N ' N ' N 7 Q1 N m N 03 10 N N 7 119 O tn N r. N N 0' 0 N 10 w O n N N N T .n+ 111 w 1a m 01 1.11 N ' 40 N O a 7 rn 10 N n 10 m n N Q m N N N H N N 7 N N ' ID0 [V ID 4/1 a N m m R7 m N n n 001 N N ' N m 1Y" N N M 01 h 0 N CO N 8 117 N 7 N 0' rnN CO No 117 N N N N t0 T 01 N N N T 3R n N 00 n N rnN n M 0i Q ri N N N ' N ' N 1!1 ti N N Qi N N ' N ' N m 0' 2 N N a M Cr; N 0 N m n n m N 7 N n N m 10 7 N N N '4 .y CO 14 T O 1 N n CO 0-1 N N 7 0' H N m O '0 m N r1 0' m N N N N ' 10 b 0) O N m 0 rn 10 N n m N t0 w N N ' N ao b en .'1 H rr 111 LO 0 O 14/ 10 N N ' 7 a rn N N ' N N ' N N N 0' N n 7 n N 03 N m Cr. in N r• N m .a` 10 N N N ' N N ' N 0 01 M N n '0 .mi N N Q m N N ' N ' N ' H N O N m Ot O N N ' 01 CO 00 N N ' N N n .M iD r1 N Q 10 0 Q CO N Cr. m 10 01 N n n m m N N ' N ' N N ' N N ' m E00 N N N ' n 00 01 O N Q 10 n V1 0 N m 1.11 7 0 7 1a N N ' .. LO n rn N N ' N 8 .-1 co 0o N 0 N m N N LO T 0 N N 01 m 7 N 8 01 1/1N N N ' '4 O 1 N u N ' N N H ' rn 1l1 40 N N ' 0, n ti .y i6 0 O N N 1J1 01 d 01 N N ' 117 m 0 m 10 ,-i 4.4 10 1l1 0' 01 N N N 10 7 m 0 0 N 7 .y N 111v CO N 01 N 01 N m ri N N EO 1A Q 007 N N ' N ' N 0 n m 7 N N N ' N N N N N ' N 1R 8 11'1 ▪ 1 N N ' N 8 10 m 10 N 8 8 tri N 1O m to. N 8 ams rn N 8 11'1 N G w N FUND NAME 1020 General Fund 1032 State Beach Fund 1041 Street Fund 1059 FedState Grant 1066 FedState Grant 1067 Parks Grant 4010 Water Fund 4130 Gas Fund 4200 Waste Water Fund 4300 Storm Water Fund 4670 Dev Services Fund 4700 Marina Fund 4710 Visitor's Facility Fund 5010 Stores Fund 5110 Maint Svcs Fleet Fund 5115 Facility Maint Fund 5210 MIS Fund 5310 Engineering Fund 0 a 8 8 9010 Crime Control 9100 Public Health Total Replacement Cost AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 23, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of May 30, 2017 (Tabled to June 13, 2017) DATE: TO: June 13, 2017 Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Dan Grimsbo, Interim Director of Water Utilities DanG@cctexas.com (361) 826-1689 Resolution approving the Wastewater Management Plan CAPTION: Resolution approving the City of Corpus Christi Wastewater Management Plan Final Report ("Final Report") regarding options for improvements to the City's wastewater treatment plants ("WWTPs") and adopting Option 1 as stated by City Council on May 23, 2017, which provides for maintaining all existing WWTPs, not relocating the Greenwood WWTP, and flood proofing Greenwood WWTP instead. PURPOSE: To approve the Wastewater Management Plan Final Report regarding comprehensive improvements to the City's wastewater treatment plants. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: On May 23, 2017, the City Council discussed the Resolution approving the Wastewater Management Plan Final Report as a future agenda item. On May 23, 2017, the City Council approved a Motion of Direction which directed the City Manager to proceed with the base case option with the exception of relocating Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant, flood proofing Greenwood WWTP instead, and immediately proceeding with repair of the headworks at Greenwood WWTP as defined by the current Capital Improvement Program. The attached Resolution approves the City of Corpus Christi Wastewater Management Plan Final Report and adopts the modified Option 1 as stated by City Council on May 23, 2017, including some minor amendments. The minor amendments are to clarify that the Greenwood WWTP is to be repaired over 20 years (including flood proofing), and also to clarify that the effluent reuse facilities to be provided at Greenwood and Allison WWTPs for industry in next 10 years are subject to industry participation. The Greenwood WWTP currently has two projects in the CIP related to the headworks: odor control improvements and structural repairs. The odor control project E10047, "Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant Emissions and Odor Control Improvements" was completed in October of 2016. The headworks project R16329, "Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant Structural Repairs" is tentatively schedule for award of construction in February 2018. ALTERNATIVES: Council may choose not to approve the resolution OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This item conforms to City Policies. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Water Utilities FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital X Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): n/a Comments: None. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution as submitted. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution, Wastewater Management Plan Resolution approving the City of Corpus Christi Wastewater Management Plan Final Report ("Final Report") regarding options for improvements to the City's wastewater treatment plants ("WWTPs") and adopting Option 1 as stated by City Council on May 23, 2017, which provides for maintaining all existing WWTPs, not relocating the Greenwood WWTP, and flood proofing Greenwood WWTP instead. Whereas, on May 23, 2017, the Corpus Christi City Council discussed the City of Corpus Christi Wastewater Management Plan Final Report; Whereas, on May 23, 2017, the Corpus Christi City Council approved a motion directing the City Manager to proceed with the base case option with the exception of relocating Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), flood proofing Greenwood WWTP instead; and immediately proceeding with repair of the headworks at Greenwood WWTP as defined by the current Capital Improvement Program (CIP); Whereas, the City is in the process of completing the headworks projects in the CIP related to the Greenwood WWTP; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City Council for the City of Corpus Christi, Texas approves the Corpus Christi Wastewater Management Plan Final Report (the "Final Report"), regarding options for improvements to the City's Wastewater Treatment Plants. A copy of the Final Report is attached to the agenda memo accompanying this Resolution. Section 2. That the City Council adopts the Final Report's Option 1 (the "base case option") with modifications as directed by the City Council on May 23, 2017, with Option 1 modified to eliminate construction of new 10 MGD facility at Greenwood WWTP and provide for more extensive Greenwood WWTP repairs (over 20 years) with flood proofing, and with the following key infrastructure components: (1) Wastewater Collection System: Repair systems in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows; Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim; (2) Allison WWTP: Repair over next 20 years; Upgrade to biological nutrient removal ("BNR") in 10 years; Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years (subject to industry participation); (3) Greenwood WWTP: Repair over next 20 years including `flood proofing'; Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years (subject to industry participation); (4) Broadway WWTP: Repair over next 20 years; (5) Oso WWTP: Repair plant over next 20 years; Upgrade plant to BNR in next 5 years; Expand plant to 20 MGD in next 8 to 10 years; (6) Laguna Madre WWTP: Repair over next 20 years; and (7) Whitecap WWTP: Repair over next 20 years. This Resolution shall be and become effective immediately upon and after its adoption and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ATTEST: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Rebecca Huerta Joe McComb City Secretary Mayor Corpus Christi, Texas of The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Joe McComb Rudy Garza Paulette Guajardo Michael Hunter Ben Molina Lucy Rubio Greg Smith Carolyn Vaughn Council Member November 2016 Stantec Prepared for: City of Corpus Christi Prepared by: Stantec Consutling Services Inc. in association with LNV, Inc. - Bath Engineering - CR&G - Kailo Communications Sudio - TischlerBise `.■may Stantec Sign -off Sheet This document entitled City of Corpus Christi Wastewater Management Plan was prepared by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. ("Stantec") for the account of the City of Corpus Christi (the "Client"). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec's professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which athird party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by Rob Simm, PhD Reviewed by Ashok Varma, PE Sig ure ka& �' Tisch er ise November 2016 Sign -off Sheet Stantec LN/ Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Recommendation 1 Project Approach 2 Develop Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 2 Project Risks and Evaluation of Delivery Methods 4 1.0 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 8 1.1. Current Wastewater System Configurations and Operations 9 1.2. Future Requirements 24 1.3. Stakeholders and Stakeholder Input 30 1.4. Summary of Existing Constraints 32 1.5. Identification of the Preferred Wastewater Servicing Option 34 2.0 Implementation Phasing Plan 64 2.1. Introduction 64 2.2. Project Risk Assessment 67 2.3. Proposed Implementation Plan and Project Delivery 69 2.4. Interim Operations Plan 75 2.5. Stakeholder Management Plan 77 3.0 Implementation Programming Schedule 78 3.1. Introduction 78 3.2. Project Implementation Triggers 78 3.3. Proposed Program Implementation Schedule 79 3.4. Risk Management Plan 79 3.5. Fund Requirement Schedule 81 Table of Contents November 2016 R c kailo'` TischlerBise LNV Stantec List of Tables Table ES -1 Key Infrastructure Requirements for recommended Option 4D 1 Table ES -2 Wastewater Servicing Options 2 Table ES -3 Key Project Elements and Associated Critical Implementation Risks 4 Table ES -4 Summary of Fund Requirements 7 Table 1-1 Permit Limits for Existing Allison WWTP 10 Table 1-2 Permit Limits for New Broadway WWTP 11 Table 1-3 Permit Limits for Greenwood WWTP 12 Table 1-4 Permit Limits for Laguna Madre WWTP 14 Table 1-5 Permit Limits for Oso WRP 14 Table 1-6 Permit Limits for Whitecap WWTP 15 Table 1-7 Monthly DMRs for 2014 and 2015 16 Table 1-8 Physical Condition Ratings and Descriptions 17 Table 1-9 Summary of Required Upgrade Costs by Facility 18 Table 1-10 Overall Staffing Benchmarking 19 Table 1-11 Overall Power Benchmarking ($/MG Treated) 20 Table 1-12 Overall Power Benchmarking (kWh/MG) 20 Table 1-13 Typical Process Energy Usage in a Wastewater Treatment Facility 20 Table 1-14 Overall Chemical Cost Benchmark ($/MG Treated) 20 Table 1-15 Summary of Benchmarking Results by Facility 21 Table 1-16 Projected Growth by Existing Sewer Service Area 25 Table 1-17 Projected Population by Sewer Service Area 25 Table 1-18 Flow Projection by Service Area (MGD) - High 26 Table 1-19 Flow Projection by Service Area (MGD) - Low 26 Table 1-20 Current Facility Capacities Now and in 2035 27 Table 1-21 Anticipated Future Nutrient Removal Requirements 28 Table 1-22 Anticipated Biosolids Management Approach 29 Table 1-23 Anticipated Resource Recovery Systems 30 Table 1-24 Stakeholder Engagement Meetings 31 Table 1-25 Site Capacity of Existing Wastewater Treatment Plants 32 Table 1-26 Summary of Key Constraints and Approach to Addressing These 33 Table 1-27 Wastewater Servicing Options 36 Table 1-28 Summary of Infrastructure Requirements for Option 1 38 Table 1-29 Proposed Unit Operations for New 10 MGD Greenwood WWTP 38 Table 1-30 Summary of Infrastructure Requirements under Option 2A 39 Table 1-31 Proposed Unit Operations for New 12 MGD Allison WWTP 40 Table 1-32 Proposed Unit Operations for new 20 MGD Laguna Madre WWTP 40 Table 1-33 Summary of Infrastructure Requirements under Option 2B 41 Table 1-34 Summary of Infrastructure Requirements under Option 3A 43 Table 1-35 Proposed Unit Operations for New 32 MGD North Site WWTP 43 Table 1-36 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 3B 45 11 a rrh C R G kaiak Tisch &use November 2016 List of Tables Stantec LNV Table 1-37 Proposed Unit Operations for New 35 MGD Southwest WWTP 45 Table 1-38 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 3C 47 Table 1-39 Proposed Unit Operations for new 32 MGD Southeast Treatment Plant 47 Table 1-40 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 4A 48 Table 1-41 Proposed Unit Operations for new North WWTP under Option 4A 49 Table 1-42 Proposed Unit Operations for New Laguna Madre WWTP under Option 4A 49 Table 1-43 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 4B 50 Table 1-44 Proposed Unit Operations for Proposed Southwest Treatment Plant under Option 4B 51 Table 1-45 Proposed Unit Operations for Laguna Madre WWTP under Option 4B 51 Table 1-46 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 4C 52 Table 1-47 Proposed Unit Operations for New 12 MGD North Plant under Option 4C 53 Table 1-48 Proposed Unit Operations for New 20 MGD Southeast Plant Under Option 4C 53 Table 1-49 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 4D 54 Table 1-50 Proposed Unit Operations for 12 MGD New Plant under Option 4D 55 Table 1-51 Summary of Capital and O&M Costs by Option 57 Table 1-52 Difference in O&M Cost between Servicing Options for Various Labor Inflation Rates 57 Table 1-53 Difference in O&M Costs between Options for Various Power Inflation Rates 58 Table 1-54 Supplemental Wastewater User Rate Calculations 58 Table 1-55 Evaluation Criteria and Weighting Factors used for Options Evaluation 59 Table 1-56 Key Infrastructure Requirements for recommended Option 4D 63 Table 2-1 Preliminary Risk Matrix 68 Table 2-2 Comparison of Project Delivery Options - Value for Money and Increased Cost 72 Table 2-3 Examples of Recent Alternative Delivery Water Projects in Texas 74 Table 2-4 Key Project Elements and Associated Critical Implementation Risks 74 Table 2-5 Preliminary Recommendation on Staffing Levels by Employment Category 76 Table 3-1 Program Implementation Schedule 79 Table 3-2 Potential Alternative Strategies 80 Table 3-3 Summary of Fund Requirements 81 List of Tables November 2016 CTischlerase • pij t ry R LNV Stantec List of Figures Figure ES -1 General Configuration of Preferred Alternative 1 Figure ES -2 Options Evaluation Matrix 5 Figure 1-1 Service Area Boundary of Six Existing Wastewater Treatment Plants 9 Figure 1-2 Aerial Photo of Existing Allison WWTP 10 Figure 1-3 Aerial Photo of ExistingBroadwayWWTP 11 Figure 1-4 Aerial Photo of Existing Greenwood WWTP 11 Figure 1-5 Aerial Photo of Existing Laguna Madre WWTP 13 Figure 1-6 Aerial Photo of Existing Oso WRP 14 Figure 1-7 Aerial Photo of Existing Whitecap WWTP 15 Figure 1-8 Population Projections for the City of Corpus Christi (2020 to 2070) 24 Figure 1-9 Option 1 System Configuration 37 Figure 1-10 Option 2A System Configuration 39 Figure 1-11 Option 2B System Configuration 41 Figure 1-12 Option 3A System Configuration 42 Figure 1-13 Option 3B System Configuration 44 Figure 1-14 Option 3C System Configuration 46 Figure 1-15 Option 4A System Configuration 48 Figure 1-16 Option 4B System Configuration 50 Figure 1-17 Option 4C System Configuration 52 Figure 1-18 Option 4D System Configuration 54 Figure 1-19 Options Evaluation Matrix 60 Figure 1-20 System Configuration of Recommended Option - Option 4D 62 Figure 2-1 Conceptual Site Plan for New North Treatment Plant 64 Figure 2-2 Greenwood Pumping Station Site Plan 65 Figure 2-3 Preliminary Layout for Upgraded and Expanded Oso WRP 65 Figure 2-4 Potential Force Main Routing for Flow Diversion from McBride Lift Station to Broadway WWTP 66 Figure 2-5 Potential Force Main Routing for Flow Diversion from Arcadia Lift Station to Broadway WWTP 66 Figure 2-6 Relative Risk Transfer with Various Alternative Delivery Approaches 73 Figure 2-7 The Project Triangle - Anticipated Number of Bidders for Various Project Delivery Approaches 73 Figure 3-1 Alternative Option 4E 80 C R G G kaiak Tisch &use November 2016 List of Figures Stantec LN/ Abbreviations ADF Average Dry Weather Flow AS Activated Sludge BOD5 5 -day Biochemical Oxygen Demand CBOD5 5 -day Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand CHP Combined heat and power CIP Capital Improvement Plan CMAR Construction Manager at Risk DAF Dissolved Air Floatation DB Design -Build DBM Design -Build -Maintain DBO Design -Build -Operate DMR Discharge Monitoring Report DP Design Professional FAF Facility Assessment Form FTE Full time equivalents GIS Geographical Information System GMP Guaranteed Maximum Price GPCD Gallons per capita day MGD Million gallons per day MLSS Mixed liquor suspended solids NACWA National Association of Clean Water Agencies NPDES National Pollution Discharge Elimination System O&M Operations and Maintenance OPC Opinion of Probable Cost PDB Progressive Design Build P3 Public -Private -Partnership QBS Qualifications Based Selection RAS Return Activated Sludge SRT Solids Retention Time SSO Sanitary Sewer Overflow TCEQ Texas Commission on Environmental Quality TN Total Nitrogen TP Total Phosphorus TSS Total Suspended Solids TWDB Texas Water Development Board TSWQS Texas Surface Water Quality Standards USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency UV Ultraviolet Disinfection WAS Waste Activated Sludge WRP Water Reclamation Plant W W TP Wastewater Treatment Plant Abbrevlatlons November 2016 LNV Stantec Executive Summary Recommendation Based on the analysis outlined within this report, it is recommended that the City of Corpus Christi (City) adopt Option 4D for their Wastewater Management Plan. The configuration of this preferred option is presented in Figure ES -1 and the primary elements summarized in Table ES -1. Figure ES -1 General Configuration of Preferred Alternative ( ) New Treatment Plant • Close Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant O Expand Treatment Plant —> Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline —>p /////://, —> 14. J Table ES -1 Key Infrastructure Requirements for recommended Option 4D Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Repair over next 10 years • Decommission the plant after 10 -years and build new pumping station to direct flows to the new North treatment plant. North Treatment Plant • Construct a new 12 MGD facility at the North treatment plant site in the next 5 years. • Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to the new North treatment plant site. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years Oso • Repair plant over next 20 years • Upgrade plant to BNR and expand to 20 MGD over next 5 years. Laguna Madre • Repair the existing plant over the next 5 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Laguna Madre plant to transfer wastewater from Laguna Madre to the Oso treatment plant. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years Path C R G kaiakTisch &use November 2016 Executive Summary 1 Stantec LNV Project Approach The overall objective of this project is to determine the optimal long-range wastewater treatment plant, consolidation and trunk sewer pumping scenario. The optimal strategy will support treatment plant environmental compliance while remaining sensitive to the impact to rate payers from recommended improvements. After determining the optimal strategy, the City wishes to develop an improvements implementation plan elaborating logical project limits for procurement, project sequencing, and overall program schedule and budgets for each element. The project plan was developed under three phases as follows: • Phase 1- Develop an optimal wastewater treatment configuration • Phase 2 - Develop an implementation phasing plan • Phase 3 - Develop an implementation programming schedule Develop Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration The City of Corpus Christi presently owns and operates six (6) wastewater treatment facilities. Four of the plants (Allison WWTP, New Broadway WWTP, Oso WRP, and Greenwood WWTP) are located in the main part of the city, one (Laguna Madre WWTP) is located on and services the Flour Bluff area, and one (Whitecap WWTP) is located on Padre Island. One of the primary reasons for conducting this study was to confirm the potential benefits of consolidating flows from the six existing wastewater treatment facilities into a lesser number of newer larger treatment plants. The unit operating costs for larger wastewater treatment plants tend to be lower than for smaller facilities. This is primarily due to reduced staffing levels, measured as full-time equivalents (FTEs) per million gallon (MG) treated, and lower unit power costs measured as kilowatt hours (kW -hr) per million gallon treated that decline with increasing plant capacity. Ten consolidation options were evaluated for this study, as summarized in Table ES -2. Table ES -2 Wastewater Servicing Options Category Description Options 1- Maintain all Existing Plant sites • Keep six sites. Replace Greenwood on same site. Continue with current operations and planned maintenance. • 1- Maintain Existing Sites 2 - Consolidate at Existing Plant sites • Keep Broadway & Whitecap. • Consolidate remainder at two of the existing plant sites. • 2A - Allison + Laguna Madre • 2B Allison + Oso 3 - Consolidate at New Plant site • Keep Broadway & Whitecap. • Consolidate remainder at one new plant site. • 3A - North site • 3B - Southwest site • 3C - Southeast site 4 - Combination of New and Existing sites • Keep Broadway & Whitecap. • Consolidate remainder at two sites with at least one new site plus an existing site. • 4A - North + Laguna Madre • 4B - Southwest + Laguna Madre • 4C - North + Southeast • 4D - North + Oso 2 Executive Summary November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBise The city is facing an estimated sustaining capital spend at the six existing wastewater treatment facilities of approximately $220 M. The majority of the capital requirements are for the Greenwood (approximately $61 M) and Oso (approximately $81 M) facilities. The contributing sewer shed for these two plants is also where the majority of anticipated demand growth is expected to occur. The 2016 capital improvement plan is for an estimated capital spend to 2035 of approximately $524 M and results in utility rates that are considered unaffordable based upon EPA affordability criteria. User rate increases are driven in large part by increases in capital spend. The increase in capital spending can be partly offset by reductions in annual operation and maintenance (O&M) spend. Options requiring a large upfront capital spend over the next 5 to 10 years will have a significant further negative impact upon wastewater user rates if not offset by O&M cost efficiencies. The implementation of any of the options presented in this report needs to strike the appropriate balance between minimizing the sustaining capital spend on existing facilities destined to be taken out of service and consolidating existing facilities as soon as practical in order to realize annual O&M savings associated with economies of scale, while staging planned capital spending for new facilities in order to minimize the impact upon user rates. The best way to assess the options under consideration was to construct a detailed cash flow model for each. The consulting team constructed detailed capital and O&M cost models for each of the ten options considered for this study. All of the options were compared against Option 1- Maintain existing six plant sites, which was treated as the benchmark. The team then conducted sensitivity analyses on each of the options considered to determine how changing conditions might impact costs as well as the recommended servicing option. The financial analysis suggests Option 1- Maintain the six existing plant sites has the lowest overall capital cost associated with treatment and pumping infrastructure given that it takes maximum advantage of existing infrastructure. However, Option 1 has the highest O&M costs of the options considered. Option 1 also has the highest capital cost for industrial reuse water given reuse water would likely have to be provided from two treatment plants as opposed to one under other options, which renders no significant user rate savings. Rath C R r<r G kaiak use LNV ® Stantec The cost analyses suggest Options 2B and 4D are competitive with Option 1 from an overall cost perspective considering capital costs for treatment and reuse as well as cumulative O&M costs. The relative impact on user rates for options 1, 2B, and 4D is essentially equal. Option 3A, which has the highest cumulative capital cost of the options considered, would have a statistically significant impact on user rates relative to the Option 1 benchmark. Sensitivity analysis demonstrates that the difference in O&M cost savings is most sensitive to labor costs and labor cost inflation. The consolidation options each result in significant staff reductions relative to the bench mark Option 1 even after optimizing existing plant operations. Higher future labor costs and increased labor inflation will favor the consolidation options, particularly options 2B and 4D, relative to the benchmark (Option 1). Prior to evaluating the Options, the City staff and their consultant team engaged with the citizens and other stakeholders to hear what issues and concerns needed to be considered in selecting the optimum future wastewater configuration. As can be expected, there was a wide range of opinions expressed by the general public, neighborhood associations, agencies, business professionals and other interested parties. These issues of concern were then grouped into preliminary evaluation criteria to cover the Economic, Social, Natural and Technical environments. The preliminary criteria were presented to City staff at an evaluation workshop where the team could confirm that these fully covered the range of relevant issues and also establish the relative priorities. Three priority levels and associated weightings were proposed: normal items were unweighted (level 1), important items were given a double weighting (level 2) and the most critical items were given a triple weighting (level 3). Having established the evaluation criteria, each of the 10 Options was evaluated using a qualitative five -point scale that ranged from strongly negative to strongly positive with a neutral midpoint level. It should be emphasized that the evaluation is subjective in nature and seeks to determine the relative performance or predicted impact under each criteria of an option as compared to the performance or impact of the other servicing options. To reinforce that the evaluation is qualitative in nature, symbols rather than numbers were used to represent the "score" under each criterion. The evaluation of the ten options are presented here in Figure ES -2. Based on this evaluation, the highest ranked wastewater servicing configuration (identified as 4D) is to consolidate future wastewater treatment around two main facilities - a new North plant and the existing Oso plant. It should be noted that this evaluation was based on assumptions of future water quality effluent standards which will still need to be verified. November 2016 Executive Summary 3 Stantec LNV Project Risks and Evaluation of Delivery Methods The key project elements associated with implementation of the preferred configuration (Option 4D) along with the key implementation risks are summarized here in Table ES -3. Rehabilitation and small upgrade projects identified in the physical condition survey would likely be delivered under traditional Design Bid Build (DBB) delivery or some form of job order contracting (JOC) arrangement. Table ES -3 Key Project Elements and Associated Critical Implementation Risks Project Time Frame Estimated Cost ($M) Key Risk Elements Oso WRP BNR upgrade and Expansion 0-5 year $72 M • Constructability associated with existing plant • Impact of construction on existing plant operations. • Inability to secure discharge permit. • Higher cost due to unforeseen circumstances. • Estimated operations cost savings not achieved. Greenwood PS and Force main 0-5 year $73 M • Ability to secure required easements for force main. • Delay in PS and force main construction delays flow transfer to North plant and increases Greenwood WWTP sustaining capital spend. • Traffic impacts during construction. • Flooding of construction site. Laguna Madre PS and Force main 6-10 year $18 M • Ability to get permit for Oso Bay pipeline crossing. • Securing required easements for force main. • Traffic impacts during construction. New North WWTP 0-5 year $103 M • Ability to secure suitable project site. • Delay in getting effluent discharge permit for new plant. • New plant construction not completed on time resulting in additional sustaining capital spend at Greenwood. • Greenwood PS and force main not ready in time to commission new plant. • Operations cost savings not attained post construction. Allison PS and Force main 11-15 years $22 M • Securing required easements for force main. • Traffic impacts during construction. A multi criteria analysis (MCA) was conducted to confirm the best delivery method for each project. Based on this analysis, recommended delivery methods are as follows: • Laguna Madre PS and Force Main - Design -Bid -Build (DBB) • Alison PS and Force Main - Design -Bid -Build (DBB) • Greenwood PS and Force Main - Design -Build (DB) • New North WWTP - Design -Build -Operate (DBO) • Oso WRP BNR Upgrade and Expansion - Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) • Industrial Reuse - Public Private Partnership (P3) 4 Executive Summary November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBise LNV ® Stantec Figure ES -2 Options Evaluation Matrix U Sub -Topic 1 _ — 2A _— 2B __� �= -'� 3A __— 3B 3C 4A 4B — 4C __— 4D ___ Total Capital Cost Strongly positive —capital cost less than$800M Neutral -mid levelcapital cost of$900M to $1,000M Positive -capital iri cost lessthan $900M Negative -capital fi)costmorethan $1,000M Negative -capital costmorethan $1,000M Negative -capital fi)costmorethan $1,000M Neutral -mid level capital cost of$900M to $1,000M Neutral -mid levelcapital cost of$900M to $1,000M Neutral -mid level capital cost of$900M to $1,000M Positive - capital 46 cost less than $900M Total O&M Cost Negative -high level O&M cost morethan$550M Neutral- mid 4-_)levelO&M cost of $525M to $550M Strongly positive- • low O&M cost less than$500M Neutral- mid 4-_)levelO&M cost of $525M to $550M Neutral -mid o level O&M cost of $525M to $550M Neutral- mid o levelO&M cost of $525M to $550M Positive -lower 1) O&M cost of $500M to $525M Neutral- mid 1) levelO&M cost of $525M to $550M Neutral -mid 1) level O&M cost of $525M to $550M Strongly positive - • low O&M cost less than$500M Cash Flow Strongly positive- • max annual spend of approx $100M Neutral -max O annual spend of approx$200M Neutral -max O annual spend of approx$200M Negative -max O annual spend of approx$250M Negative -max O annual spend of approx$250M Negative -max O annual spend of approx$250M Negative -max O annual spend of approx$250M Strongly negative 0-maxannual $30 dl�ofapprox Strongly negative 0-maxannual $30ndI�ofapprox Neutral -max O annual spend of approx$200M Maintaining base flow Neutral -keeps O ll flows at status quo dr) Negative -reduce flows to Oso Bay Neutral -keeps O criticalflows at status quo dr) Negative -reduce flows to Oso Bay Strongly negative O - reduce flow to Oso Bay, increase to Oso Creek O Negative -reduce flows to Oso Bay ONegative -reduce flows to Oso Bay Strongly negative O - reduce flows to Oso Bay, increase to Oso Creek ONegative -reduce flows to Oso Bay Neutral -keeps O criticalflows at status quo Effluent requirements Negative - continues challenges in Oso Bay and Nueces River Neutral- continues challenges in NuecesRiver Negative- continues © challenges in Oso Bay and Nueces giver Positive -allows 46 lower treatment requirements Neutral- continues challenges in Oso Creek Neutral- continues challenges in Oso Creek Positive -allows lower treatment requirements Neutral- continues challenges in Oso Creek Positive -allows lower treatment requirements Neutral- lower treatment in north, challenges inOso Bay Local eco systems Neutral -keeps status quo Negative- 4' potentialimpact at Blind Oso from loss of flow Neutral -keeps status quo Negative- potentialimpact at Blind Oso from loss of flow Negative- ON potentialimpact at Blind Osofrom loss of flow Negative- potentialimpact at Blind Oso from loss of flow Negative- ON potentialimpact at Blind Osofrom loss of flow Negative- potentialimpact at Blind Oso from loss of flow Negative - ON potentialimpact at Blind Osofrom loss of flow Neutral -keeps status quo Phasing potential Positive -can � proceed with multiple projects atone time Neutral- can 4) proceed at two sites and with pipelines Neutral- can � proceed at two sites and with pipelines Negative- requires all fp projects robe completed at same time Negative- requires all projects to be completed at sametime Negative - requires all projects robe completed at same time Neutral- can � proceed at two sites and with pipelines Neutral- can 4) proceed at two sites and with pipelines Neutral- can � proceed at two sites and with pipelines Neutral- can 4) proceed at two sites and with pipelines Immediate start to work Neutral- challenges at Oso, remainder available Positive - can dop work adjacent toboth existing plants Neutral- challenges at Oso, remainder available Negative or, -requires acquisition of land Negative 4- - requires acquisition of land Positive - can work independently on new plant Negative 4- - requires acquisition of land Negative - requires acquisition of land Negative 4- - requires acquisition of land Negative - requires acquisitiona land and working at Oso u c kaio ^ Tschler�is, Legend 0 O C 6 • Strongly Negative Neutral Positive Strongly Negative Positive 1 November 2016 ® Stantec LNv 15'.rn S2 U Sub -Topic 1 _�` 2A ht aq„�: __� 2B t$ Afiv.'!- _— - 3A _— ... 3B t ...0 .fiyir` __ 'Negative 3C t 44¢lr_ _= ��' 4A ._.- _ 4B _ 4C — 4D Neighboring g g land use Neutral -.w coatraue residential conflicts at Oso and Greenwood Positive u � sites with good buffers Neutral- continuesCentrales c r esideatial conflicts at Oso Stroaglypositive • -new plant in industrial area newr © plaatmgeaerally residential area Negative -new © plaatmgeaerally residential area Positive � sites withgood buffers Negative -new © plant in generally residential area Neutral- Continues 0 residential conflicts at Oso and Greenwood Neutral-` 0 r esideatial conflicts at Oso Land ownership Positive -no new tio land required for 20 years Strongly positive _ no new land • required for >30 years Strongly positive _ no new land • required for >30 years Negative -land O required for new plant Strongly negative -new O laadrequiredia residential area Strongly positive _ nonewland • required for >30 years Negative -land O requiredfornew plant Negative -land O requiredfor new plant Negative -land O requiredfornew plant Negative -land O requiredfor new plant Existingis impacts Neutral- continues status quo Positive -removes impac at Greenwood and Oso Neutral- Continues C impacts at Oso Positive -removes impac is at Greenwood and Oso Neutral- pac 0 continuesim is atOso Creek Neutral- impacts 0 continuesim is atOso Creek Positive removes tsatOso impacts Creek Neutral- impacts 0 continuesim is atOso Creek Neutral- pac 0 continuesim is atOso Creek Neutral- impacts 0 continuesim is atOso Creek Flooding potential Negative - O requires new flood wall at Greenwood Positive - removes impact from flooding at Oso Creek Positive - removes Au impact from flooding at Oso Creek Positive - removes Au impact from flooding at Oso Creek Neutral -requires O additionalflood protection along Oso Creek Neutral -requires O additionalflood protection along Oso Creek Positive - removes Au impact from flooding at Oso Creek Neutral -requires O additionalflood protection along Oso Creek Neutral -requires O additionalflood protection along Oso Creek Positive -removes Au impact from flooding at Oso Creek 0 Restoration 0 requirements posii Strongly poewOe -mini pipelines required fp Negative -new pipelines required Negative -new pipelines required Strongly negative -requires O extensive pipeline construction Strongly negative requires O extensive pipeline construction Strongly negative -requires O extensive pipeline construction Negative -new O pipehaes re quiredtt) Negative -new pipehaes re quired Negative -new pipehaes re quiredtt) Negative -new pipehaes required Traffic disruption Strongly positive • -minimalnew pipelines required Neutral- new pipelines is generally open areas Neutral- new pipelines in generally open areas Negative- O pipelines cross built up areas Negative- O pipelines cross built up areas Negative- O pipelines cross built up areas Neutral- new pipehnesin generally open areas Neutral- new pfpehnesin generally open areas Negative- O pipelines cross built up areas Neutral- new pfpehnesin generally open areas Potentialfor Reuse Negative- Long distance Oto servicing industry Positive -Allison 46 plantcloseto industry Positive - Allison 46 plant close to industry Strongly positive- • North plant close to industry Negative- Long distance Oto servicing industry Strongly negative -Longest distance Oto servicing industry Positive - North plant close to industry Negative - Long distance Oto servicing industry Positive - North plant close to industry Positive - North 46 plantcloseto industry Servicing new Development Negative - needs O se e growthne Neutral -requires expansion of o pumping and plant Neutral -requires expansion of 0 pumping and plant Neutral -requires expansion of 0 pumping and plant Strongly positive •reewcplantto • -closetonew growth Strongly positive • -closetonew growth Positive -can readily provide capacity for new growth Strongly positive • -closetonew growth Strongly positive • -closetonew growth Positive -can readily provide capacity for new growth - Efficiency of O&M Strongly negative continues O operations at 6 sites Neutral- consolidate to two m main plants, one new Neutral- consolidate to two m main plants, one new Strongly positive- • consolidate to one main new plant Strongly positive- • consolidate to one main new plant Strongly positive- • consolidate to one main plant Positive - consolidate to two W main plants, both new Positive - consolidate to two W aia plants, both new Positive - consolidate to two W main plants, both new Neutral - consolidate to two main plants, one new Flexibility forfuture consolidation Negative O-doesnot facilitatefuture consolidation Neutral- can c consolidate Whitecap burner Broadway Neutral- can c consolidate Wlsstecap but not Broadway Neutral- can c consolidate Broadwaybutaot Whitecap Negative O-doesnot facilitatefuture consolidation Neutral- can c consolidate Whitecap burner Broadway Positive - can 46 consolidateboth Wlsstecap and Broadway Neutral- can o consolidate Whitecap burner Broadway Positive - can 46 consolidateboth Wlsstecap and Broadway Positive - can 46 consolidateboth Whitecap and Broadway Overall Rating 102 101 104 95 78 86 100 84 92 106 November 2016 DIU halo 'n iischl r�7s LNV ® Stantec The estimated cash flow requirements for the recommended servicing plan are summarized here in Table ES -4. All capital costs are presented here in 2016 constant dollars. The capital spend by project and year is included with the cash flow models presented in Appendix K. Table ES -4 Summary of Fund Requirements Program Element Collection System Upgrades Associated with Reducing Overflows Implementation Time Frame 0-5 yr. 6-10 yr. 11-15 yr. 16-20 yr. $127 M $127 M $127 M Allison WWTP Repair and Rehab $13 M $4 M Allison PS and Force main $22 M Broadway WWTP Repair and Rehab $11 M $3 M $1 M Oso WRP Repair and Rehab $54 M $3 M $6 M $18 M Oso WRP BNR Upgrade & Expansion $72 M Greenwood Repair and Rehab $14 M Greenwood PS and Force main $73 M Laguna Madre Repair and Rehab $7 M Laguna Madre PS and Force main $18 M New North WWTP $103M Whitecap WWTP Repair and Rehab $19 M $2 M $2 M TOTALS $493 M $155 M $157 M $21 M The total estimated capital spend for Option 4D is approximately $826 M with O&M savings over the next 30 -years of approximately $60 M relative to the benchmark option of maintaining the six existing wastewater treatment plants. Path C R kalio "` TischlerSise G November 2016 Executive Summary 7 Optimal Wastewater Tre Configuration `NV Stantec 1.0 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration The overall objective of this project is to determine the optimal long-range wastewater treatment plant, consolidation and trunk sewer pumping scenario. The optimal strategy will support treatment plant environmental compliance while remaining sensitive to the impact to rate payers from recommended improvements. After determining the optimal strategy, the City wishes to develop an improvements implementation plan elaborating logical project limits for procurement, project sequencing, and overall program schedule and budgets for each element. The project plan was developed under three phases as follows: • Phase 1- Develop an optimal wastewater configuration scenario • Phase 2 - Develop an implementation phasing plan • Phase 3 - Develop an implementation programming schedule Our general approach to the wastewater management plan development included: • Confirm what drives capital and operating and maintenance costs - Sustaining capital requirements needs were identified for each of the six (6) existing wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Those factors that will drive future capital expenditure were also identified. Current operating and maintenance (O&M) costs were benchmarked against other comparable facilities and opportunities to optimize existing costs were identified. • Confirm anticipated costs and associated user rates for the status quo alternative - All of the options considered for this study were compared against the alternative of continuation of the existing six -plant system. The project team confirmed the city's current upgrading and expansion plans for the six existing plants. Operational improvements were also identified so that each option considered could be compared against the upgraded, expanded, and optimized six -plant system. • Determine the best recapitalization and consolidation plan that balances cost and technical requirements - An extensive stakeholder engagement plan was conducted to assist in identifying non-financial factors important to the overall plan development. A pre-screening analysis that considered financial, social, environmental and technical factors was used to short-list the best options. • Develop a plan that allows for adjustments to the overall implementation - It is critically important to develop a plan that is flexible enough to account for potential market, regulatory, and technology changes. The pre-screening analysis favored long term servicing options that support flexible implementation. • Develop a CIP and list of contracting packages - Contracting packages that support a cost-effective solution and provide the best value to the City and rate payers were identified. • Identify risk factors associated with implementation - Every project involves some degree of risk. The key project risks, probability of their occurrence, and consequences of a specific risk being realized were identified. A risk management plan was then developed to address identified risks. • Identify the best project delivery approach and plan for each contracting package - The party best able to manage potential project risks was identified in consultation with the City, and the best project delivery approach for each contracting package was determined. • Develop a cash flow plan and schedule - The results of the study were summarized into a cash flow plan and associated schedule. Path C R G kaiak Tisch &use November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 8 Stantec LNV 1.1. Current Wastewater System Configurations and Operations 1.1.1 Existing System Configuration and Operations The City of Corpus Christi presently owns and operates six (6) wastewater treatment facilities. Four of the plants (Allison WWTP, New Broadway WWTP, Oso WRP, and Greenwood WWTP) are located in the main part of the city, one (Laguna Madre WWTP) is located on and services the Flour Bluff area, and one (Whitecap WWTP) is located on Padre Island. The service area for each of the existing six plants is presented here in Figure 1-1. Figure 1-1 Service Area Boundary of Six Existing Wastewater Treatment Plants Allison pro moo, I reenFwU d 1 ISA HOD] City of Corpus Christi I Wastewater Service Areas L� 2 4 8 Miles 12 The plants vary in age from the original construction in the WWTP. • Oso pf9-# MODS 00.4,e. Go,Ouf Cfi,St Day Laguna Madre 3.9 M4DS • 1. The wastewater collection system is extensive and consists 100 miles of force main. Whitecap SR.S M44S 1940s and 1950s to the recently constructed New Broadway of 1,243 miles of sanitary sewer, 100 pumping stations, and Abrief description of each of the six wastewater treatment plants is provide in the text that follows. 9 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 RNIL c kailo'` TlschlerBlse 1.1.1.1 Allison WWTP The Allison WWTP is a 5 million gallon per day (MGD) activated sludge facility that is currently being operated in "contact stabilization" mode. Originally constructed in 1966 as a 2 MGD facility, the Allison WWTP was expanded in 1984 to its current capacity and modified to allow for wastewater treatment to be accomplished in either the "contact stabilization" or "complete mix" mode. An annotated aerial photograph of the existing Allison WWTP is shown in Figure 1-2. Figure 1-2 Aerial Photo of Existing Allison WWTP The liquid treatment unit processes of the Allison WWTP include screening, grit removal, complete mix activated sludge process, secondary clarification, filtration, disinfection, sludge stabilization and sludge dewatering. Raw wastewater enters the plant through a gravity collection system and the force main from the Sharpsburg Lift Station and is then pumped by the Plant Lift Station to the new Mechanical Bar Screen Facility where debris is screened from the flow. The wastewater continues by gravity to the adjacent Grit Removal Unit where grit is separated from the flow before it is split between the East and West Aeration Basins. The activated sludge treatment process consists of nine aeration basins. The aeration basins are separated into the east and west plants. The east plant is from the original 1966 construction and consists of six aeration basins and the west plant was constructed in 1984 and consists of three aeration basins. There are four centrifugal blowers located in the Blower Building that are used to supply air to the east and west aeration basins, east aeration airlift, west aeration airlift, pre - thickener airlift pumps, and aerobic digesters 1 thru 4. Mixed liquor from the Aeration Basins flow to the two Final Clarifiers where solids are allowed to settle out and the clear water (effluent) flows over the weirs to the Automatic Backwash Filter. Return Activated Sludge (RAS) pumps recirculate the solids to the head of the Aeration Basins to Path C R G kalokTisch &use LNV ® Stantec mix with the incoming raw wastewater. The Automatic Backwash Filters provide additional solids removal from the effluent before it is dosed with liquid Sodium Hypochlorite for disinfection in the Chlorine Contact Chamber. At the end of this chamber the effluent is dosed with Sodium Bisulfite to remove the chlorine in the water. Solids are removed from the system, concentrated in the thickeners and stabilized in the Aerobic Digesters prior to dewatering on the two belt presses in the Sludge Dewatering Building. The existing Sludge Drying Beds provide a location for dewatering other material collected at the plant. Dried solids are transported to the City's landfill for disposal. Treated effluent from the Allison WWTP is permitted by the TCEQ to be discharged from two separate outfalls. Outfall 001 is the original discharge method through two parallel 24 -inch diameter pipes leading from the plant site, north to the Nueces River. Treated effluent can also be pumped to Outfall 002, known as the Effluent Diversion Demonstration Project, located across the Nueces River from the plant. Discharge from Outfall 002 is into South Lake in the west end of Nueces Bay. The existing effluent discharge permit for the Allison WWTP was issued January 12, 2015 and expires on May 1, 2018. The current permit limits are summarized here in Table 1-1. Table 1-1 Permit Limits for Existing Allison WWTP Effluent Characteristic Daily Average Outfall No. 001- Nueces River Tidal Flow 5 MGD (peak 2 -hour flow = 15 MGD) BOD5 20 mg/L (weekly - 30 mg/L, max - 45 mg/L) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 20 mg/L (weekly - 30 mg/L, max. - 45 mg/L) Ammonia - Nitrogen 12 mg/L (weekly -18 mg/L, max. - 24 mg/L) Enterococci 35 MPN/100 mL (max. - 104 MPN/100 mL) Outfall No. 002 - Nueces to South Lake Flow 2 MGD (peak 2 -hour flow = 4 MGD) BOD5 20 mg/L (weekly - 30 mg/L, max - 45 mg/L) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 20 mg/L (weekly - 30 mg/L, max. - 45 mg/L) Ammonia - Nitrogen 4 mg/L (weekly- 6 mg/L, max. -10 mg/L) Enterococci 35 MPN/100 mL (max. - 104 MPN/100 mL) November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 10 5 Stantec LNV 1.1.1.2 Broadway WWTP The Broadway WWTP is an 8 MGD activated sludge facility that was constructed between 2010 and 2013 to replace the original Broadway WWTP constructed in 1938 and subsequently upgraded in 1940, 1950, 1954, and 1980. An aerial photo of the existing Broadway WWTP is shown in Figure 1-3.. Figure 1-3 Aerial Photo of Existing Broadway WWTP 1.1.1.3 Greenwood WWTP The Greenwood WWTP is an 8 MGD activated sludge facility that currently operates in the "complete mix" mode. Constructed in 1957, the Greenwood WWTP, was originally known as the Westside WWTP and operated as a trickling filter plant with anaerobic digestion. Since then the Greenwood WWTP underwent two major expansions. The first in 1990 increased the plant's capacity to 6 MGD and converted the contact stabilization. The second expansion occurred in 1998, which further increased the plant's capacity to 8 MGD and converted the wastewater treatment process from the "contact stabilization" mode to the "complete mix" mode. An annotated aerial photo of the existing Greenwood WWTP is shown in Figure 1-4. Figure 1-4 Aerial Photo of Existing Greenwood WWTP The new Broadway WWTP consists of influent pumping, screening, grit removal, three aeration basins, two secondary clarifiers, and UV disinfection. The new Broadway WWTP is the only existing facility that accepts hauled waste. The plant discharges treated effluent to the Corpus Christi inner harbor. The existing effluent discharge permit for the new BroadwayWWTPwas issued December 10, 2013 and expired on June 1, 2016. The City is currently negotiating a permit renewal with TCEQ. The current permit limits are summarized here in Table 1-2. Note that the peak 2 -hour capacity has been planned and permitted for 40 MGD but to date has only been built at 20 MGD. Table 1-2 Permit Limits for New Broadway WWTP Effluent Characteristic Daily Average Discharge - Corpus Christi Inner Harbor Flow BODS Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Total Copper Enterococci 8 MGD (peak 2 -hour flow = 40 MGD) 20 mg/L (weekly- 30 mg/L, max - 45 mg/L) 20 mg/L (weekly- 30 mg/L, max. - 45 mg/L) 0.0241 mg/L (max. - 0.051 mg/L) 35 MPN/100 mL (max. - 104 MPN/100 mL) The liquid treatment unit processes of the Greenwood WWTP include screening, grit removal, complete mix activated sludge process, secondary clarification, disinfection, sludge stabilization and sludge dewatering. All raw wastewater flow enters the plant through the gravity collection system and is then pumped by the Plant Lift Station to the Influent Structure where debris is removed by the mechanical bar screens and grit is separated in the grit chambers. A Parshall flume and flow meter measure and record the influent flow stream. Splitter Box No.1 on the end of this structure divides the flow to the four Primary Clarifiers. A portion of the solids settle out in the primary clarifiers and they are pumped to the thickener. The remaining raw wastewater overflows the clarifier weirs and continues on to Splitter Box No. 2. Splitter Box No. 2 is used to mix the raw wastewater from the Primary Clarifiers with the Return Activated Sludge (RAS) from the Final Clarifiers and then divides it to each end of the Aeration Basins. The activated sludge treatment process consists of five aeration basins. There are four centrifugal blowers located in the Blower Building that are 11 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 nein C R G kapok Tsscs h lase used to supply air to the Aeration Basins and various airlift pumps and aerated structures. Mixed liquor from the Aeration Basins flow to the two Final Clarifiers where solids are allowed to settle out and the clear water (effluent) flows over the weirs to the Effluent Screening Facility. RAS pumps recirculate the solids to Splitter Box No. 2 to mix with the raw wastewater. A portion of the settled solids is removed as Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) and is pumped to the thickener. The Effluent Screening Facility removes any remaining larger solids from the effluent before it travels through the Ultraviolet (UV) Disinfection Unit. The effluent is dosed with ultraviolet light in the UV Disinfection Unit to kill pathogens and provide disinfection of the effluent prior to discharge. A Parshall flume and flow meter measure and record the effluent prior to discharge at the Effluent Structure. This structure also contains the non -potable water pumps that pump the treated effluent into the plant non -potable water distribution system for use around the plant site. An Effluent Pump Station is located adjacent to the Effluent Structure and pumps water for off-site effluent reuse. Primary solids from the four primary clarifiers, as well as Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) from the secondary clarifiers are pumped to the Dissolved Air Floatation (DAF) Thickener for additional thickening. The supernatant from the DAF is either transported back to the lift station at the headworks of the plant or is re -circulated through the DAF following air -injection. From the DAF, the sludge goes through the Digester Pump Building and is pumped into one of two primary anaerobic digesters: Primary Digester No. 2 and Primary Digester No. 3, which are filled alternately. The sludge in the primary digesters is recirculated through the sludge heaters in the Digester Pump Building. These heaters are operated as necessary (mostly in the winter months when the ambient temperatures are low) to maintain optimal temperatures for anaerobic digestion. The sludge is then pumped through the Digester No. 1 Pump House into Primary Digester No. 1 where further anaerobic digestion occurs. Under designed operating conditions Primary Digester No. 1 is filled from the bottom and the sludge is mixed periodically through recirculation. The sludge then gravity feeds into the Secondary Digester for final digestion. In the Secondary Digester the sludge is also periodically recirculated while decanting supernatant from the sludge. This supernatant is transported back to the Influent Lift Station through a 10 -inch drain line. From the Secondary Digester, the sludge is pumped into the Sludge Dewatering Building and fed into one of the two belt filter presses. The filtrate from the belt filter presses is transported back to the Influent Lift Station through the same 10 -inch drain line conveying the supernatant from the secondary digester. Even though the plant has the Path C R G kaiakTisch &use LNV ® Stantec ability to utilize two belt filter presses, only one is used at a time because the 10 -inch drain line tends to overflow. The dewatered solids from the belt filter presses are transferred to containers and transported off-site for disposal. The plant has sludge drying beds, but these are not routinely in use for dewatering sludge. The beds are occasionally used if the belt filter presses are down or if a greater volume of solids needs to be wasted from the plant. Biogas is collected from all four digesters. The biogas from Primary Digester No. 2 and No. 3 is collected and is either re -injected into the respective digesters, transported to the Digester Pump Building to be combusted in the heaters, or is sent to the facility Waste Gas Burner (Flare). The heaters utilize the biogas and supplemental natural gas to heat the undigested sludge to improve the efficiency of the anaerobic digestion process. The biogas produced from Primary Digester No. 1 and the Secondary Digester is collected and flows to the Digester Pump Building to also be used by the sludge heaters. Excess biogas not utilized by the sludge heaters is combusted through the Waste Gas Burner (Flare). The existing effluent discharge permit for the Greenwood WWTP was issued March 24, 2014 and expires on June 1, 2017. The current permit limits are summarized here in Table 1-3. Table 1-3 Permit Limits for Greenwood WWTP Effluent Characteristic Daily Average Discharge - La Volla Creek (thence to Oso Creek and iimmismanimmegramisimilirmesi Flow 8 MGD (peak 2 -hour flow = 24 MGD) BODS 10 mg/L (weekly -15 mg/L, max - 25 mg/L) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 15 mg/L (weekly - 25 mg/L, max. - 45 mg/L) Total Copper 0.013 mg/L (max. - 0.027 mg/L) Ammonia -Nitrogen 3 mg/L (weekly- 6 mg/L, max. -10 mg/L) Enterococci 35 MPN/100 mL (max. - 104 MPN/100 mL) Dissolved Oxygen 4 mg/L minimum 1.1.1.4 Laguna Madre WWTP The Laguna Madre Wastewater Treatment Plant is a 3.0 MGD activated sludge facility that is currently operated in the extended aeration mode. The plant was originally constructed in 1971 to serve the Flour Bluff area of Corpus Christi, and was expanded in 1986 to meet projected population demand. The Laguna Madre Plant has the ability to be operated in either extended aeration or contact stabilization mode. An annotated aerial photo of the existing Laguna Madre WWTP is presented here as Figure 1-5. November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 12 Stantec LNV Figure 1-5 Aerial Photo of Existing Laguna Madre WWTP The existing plant process consists of an influent lift station, headworks (including manual bar screen and grit removal facility), aeration basins, secondary clarifiers, return activated sludge (RAS) pumps, chlorine contact chamber, chlorination and dechlorination equipment, effluent pump station, sludge pre -thickener, aerobic sludge digestion, sludge holding tank, and belt filter press. The plant has sludge drying beds which are not used at the present time, but are used when the belt press is taken offline for maintenance. Raw sewage flows into the influent lift station where the sewage is pumped to the headworks. Flow from the influent lift station is combined with raw sewage flows from the Jester Street lift station and the Laguna Shores lift station which enter the plant directly at the headworks. The combined flows pass through a manual bar screen into a grit chamber where grit and debris settle and are removed by air lift pump and grit screw conveyor. The wastewater then flows into the aeration basin where it is mixed with the RAS from both clarifiers. The mixed liquor then flows through a series of three aeration basins, where air is added to the mixed liquor using fine bubble diffusers. The aerated mixed liquor then flows over a straight weir, into a splitter box that splits the flow between the two clarifiers via two sluice gates. In the clarifiers, the mixed liquor is stilled to allow solids to settle. Solids are collected in the center cone and flows by gravity to the RAS station, where it is either sent back to the aeration chambers as RAS or it is wasted as sludge. The clarified effluent is collected through a system of overflow weirs and then flows, by gravity, to the chemical injection boxes where it is disinfected with a solution of sodium hypochlorite (hypochlorite). The effluent then flows by gravity into the chlorine contact chamber over an aeration weir and then through a v -notch weir where the chlorinated effluent is dechlorinated using a solution of sodium bisulfite. The flow rate of the dechlorinated effluent is measured by a Parshall flume. After passing through the Parshall flume, the effluent moves into a diversion box where the effluent can either be discharged by gravity to the primary outfall, (the Laguna Madre) or diverted to the effluent lift station where it is pumped off site for reuse. The plant is set up in such a way that sludge may be wasted from the center aeration basin, the clarifiers, or both. Sludge and scum from the center aeration basin are gravity fed to the pre -thickener and then pumped into the aerobic digesters where air is added to the sludge using coarse bubble diffusers and then flows to the concentrator (sludge thickener). The RAS pumps transfer the sludge from the clarifiers to either the aeration basin (as return) or digesters (as waste). The wasted sludge from the concentrator is pumped to a small sludge holding tank, and then pumped to a larger sludge holding tank and finally dewatered using a belt filter press. While the plant has drying beds, they are currently not being used. If the sludge drying beds are needed the sludge would be pumped from the small sludge holding tank to the drying beds. If the plant is operated in contact stabilization mode, wastewater from the headworks would be directed into the last aeration chamber and the return sludge from the clarifiers would be directed to the first aeration chamber. The return sludge would be aerated and stabilized before combining with the untreated wastewater in the last chamber. Once the mixed liquor passes over the straight weir into the splitter box, flow moves through the plant as described above. Compressed air is supplied to the processes through a series of five (5) blowers. The three (3) newer blowers provide air to the grit chamber, the sludge holding tank near the belt filter press, and the aeration basin. The two (2) older blowers provide air to the sludge digesters. The hypochlorite and the bisulfite are stored in above- ground tanks inside of a containment area. The plant is designed to use chemical feed pumps paced off the effluent flow meter to inject these solutions into the process. The existing effluent discharge permit for the Laguna Madre WWTP was issued August 6, 2015 and expires on April 1, 2020. The current permit limits are summarized here in Table 1-4. 13 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 C c kailo" TischlerBise Table 1-4 Permit Limits for Laguna Madre WWTP Effluent Characteristic Daily Average Discharge - Laguna Madre Flow BODS Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Enterococci 3 MGD (peak 2 -hour flow = 9 MGD) 20 mg/L (weekly- 30 mg/L, max - 45 mg/L) 20 mg/L (weekly- 30 mg/L, max. - 45 mg/L) 35 MPN/100 mL (max. - 104 MPN/100 mL) 1.1.1.5 Oso WRP The Oso Water Reclamation Plant (WRP) has a capacity of 16.2 MGD making it the largest of the six wastewater treatment plants in the City of Corpus Christi. The plant serves approximately 50% of the City's population located on the City's south side . The original Oso WRP was constructed in 1941 and has undergone several expansion projects with the most recent upgrade taking place in 1982. The existing treatment plant is operated as a conventional activated sludge facility with aerobic digestion and without primary clarification. An annotated aerial photo of the existing Oso WRP is presented here as Figure 1-6. Figure 1-6 Aerial Photo of Existing Oso WRP The Oso WRP is configured as two parallel trains; each rated at 8.1 MGD average daily flow. Although the original contact stabilization configuration was recently modified and improved with the addition ofbreakpoint chlorination and step feed pumps, the process was not originally intended, nor is it operationally efficient at removing ammonia. Influent is delivered to the Oso WRP by two in -plant lift stations and a remote lift station (Williams Lift Station), all of which discharge at the plant's headworks facility. The existing headworks includes two coarse bar screens (1 -inch spacing), and an aerated grit tank which has been out of service for many years. The screenings drop to a conveyor where they discharge into a screenings box for disposal. Path C R G kaiokTisch &use LNV ® Stantec Screened influent is introduced into the aeration basins (contact basins) where it is "contacted" with a high concentration of activated sludge. The microorganisms rapidly absorb BOD, as they have been without an external carbon source while passing through the re -aeration basins (stabilization basins). Flow from the aeration basins is directed to the rectangular secondary clarifiers, where activated sludge settles, separating it from the effluent. Activated sludge is then returned to the re -aeration basins, and the effluent proceeds to the chlorine contact basins for disinfection. The effluent from the two trains is fed to a common junction box where it is then dechlorinated and proceeds to the permitted outfall in Oso Bay. Return activated sludge (RAS) is delivered to the re- aeration basins where oxygen from additional aeration promotes metabolism of absorbed BOD. Waste activated sludge (WAS) is pumped to the end of the first pass of the re -aeration basins and is delivered to the aerobic digesters (four in series). Digested sludge is piped from Digester 1 to the recently constructed belt press building. The sludge is mixed with polymer, pressed in one of four filter presses, and then stored in a container until it is trucked to landfill for disposal. The existing effluent discharge permit for the Oso WRP was issued April 29, 2011 and expired on June 1, 2014. The City submitted a permit renewal and amendment application to TCEQ, on December 3, 2013. The permit application has been declared administratively complete and is currently under review. The current and proposed permit limits are summarized here in Table 1-5. Table 1-5 Permit Limits for Oso WRP Effluent Characteristic Daily Average Discharge - Oso Bay Flow 16.2 MGD (peak 2 -hour flow = 98 MGD) CBOD5 20 mg/L (weekly - 30 mg/L, max - 45 mg/L) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 20 mg/L (weekly - 30 mg/L, max. - 45 mg/L) Ammonia -Nitrogen 4 mg/L (weekly- 6 mg/L, max. -10 mg/L) Chlorine Residual 0.1 mg/L (maximum) Minimum Dissolved Oxygen 5 mg/L Enterococci 35 MPN/100 mL (max. - 89 MPN/100 mL) November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 14 Stantec LNV 1.1.1.6 Whitecap WWTP The Whitecap WWTP is a 2.5 MGD activated sludge treatment plant that was constructed in 1974 and serves the Padre Island portion of the City of Corpus Christi. An annotated aerial photo of the existing Whitecap WWTP is presented here as Figure 1-7. Figure 1-7 Aerial Photo of Existing Whitecap WWTP Raw influent enters the plant at the Bar Screen Building/ Headworks. This structure houses one climber screen with approximately 3/4 -inch bar spacing. Large solids are removed by the screen and carried to a small roll -off container by a belt conveyor. The screened wastewater flows to the Influent Lift Station which is configured as a wet-pit/dry-pit pump station. Screened influent is pumped to the Aeration Basin Distribution Structure equipped with gates and weirs to control flows to the Aeration Basins. The mixed liquor, a combination of raw sewage and RAS, is then split between two Aeration Basins with fine -bubble, membrane diffusers. After aeration, the Secondary Distribution Structure directs flow to one or both Secondary Clarifiers. Clear water from Clarifiers 1 and 2 flows over v -notch weirs and is disinfected in the Ultraviolet (UV) Disinfection Basin. Treated effluent is discharged into a saltwater channel connecting Corpus Christi Bay and Baffin Bay on the west side of Padre Island. The non -potable and reuse water systems draw treated effluent from a box just upstream of the Parshall Flume. Solids from the Clarifiers are removed by the RAS/WAS pumps in the RAS/WAS Pump Station. Return Activated Sludge (RAS) is directed to the Aeration Basin Distribution Structure and the Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) is pumped to the Aerobic Digesters. After digestion, solids are pumped into an effluent chamber and piped to the Solids Handling Building. WAS is pumped to the belt filter press, mixed with polymer, and pressed to a cake. The cake is disposed of by truck and landfilled. The plant also has the ability to utilize sludge drying beds for solids handling, as a contingency. The existing effluent discharge permit for the Whitecap WWTP expires on July 1, 2017. The current permit limits are summarized here in Table 1-6. Table 1-6 Permit Limits for Whitecap WWTP Effluent Characteristic Daily Average Discharge - Laguna Madre in Segment No. 2491 of the Flow Bays & Estuaries 2.5 MGD (peak 2 -hour flow = 7.5 MGD) BODS 20 mg/L (weekly - 30 mg/L, max - 45 mg/L) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 20 mg/L (weekly - 30 mg/L, max. - 45 mg/L) Minimum Dissolved Oxygen 4 mg/L Enterococci 35 MPN/100 mL (max. - 104 MPN/100 mL) 1.1.2 Physical Condition Survey of Existing Plants and Major Pumping Stations x.1.2.1 Physical Condition Survey Overview The consulting team conducted a physical condition survey of the City's six wastewater treatment facilities and two large wastewater lift stations. The primary objective of the assessment was to confirm the physical condition of the primary assets and estimate the required sustaining capital requirements for each facility. The Team had access to previous Assessment Reports, compiled by others, and the City of Corpus Christi Wastewater Capital Improvement Plan for 2015 to 2017. The Wastewater Department Business Plan and individual WWTP operating budgets, NPDES permits and Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR) for 2014 and 2015 were also reviewed. In addition, the Team leveraged its knowledge of the facilities, local conditions and relationships with equipment suppliers to evaluate and price the suggested improvements. As part of the assessment, an Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) was developed for each process area in each facility based on the Teams assessment on when those systems would need to be upgraded over the next 15 -years. These costs were derived from previous reports and the Teams understanding of the local market. Where it was determined that improvements were planned by the City, but not yet under construction, the costs were included in the OPC. Where a construction contract had been issued by the City, the costs for the upgrades were not included in the physical condition survey cost summary. The Williams and Woolridge Lift Stations were also inspected as part of this effort. Both lift stations were constructed in 1981. The Woolridge Lift Station recently added a stand-alone wet weather bypass pump to alleviate wet weather backups into neighboring homes. The 15 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 nein G C R halo Tisch rise LNV ® Stantec Williams Lift Station has not had any major improvements since being constructed. A review of the monthly National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) for the years 2014 and 2015 indicated that the facilities have an excellent compliance record. The percent of compliance was calculated using the number of permitted parameters and the frequency of the required testing. Where continuous monitoring is required, it was not used in the calculation, but any exceedances were used. Table 1-7 outlines the facilities compliance record. Table 1-7 Monthly DMRs for 2014 and 2015 Facility Compliance Record 2014 Compliance Record 2015 Percent Compliance 99.56% Excursions 9 Parameter(s) Ammonia Percent Compliance 99.90% Excursions 2 Parameter(s) Ammonia, Enterococcus Allison WWTP Greenwood WWTP 99.84% 3 Enterococcus 99.64% 7 Enterococcus, Copper Laguna Madre WWTP 100% 0 100.00% 0 New Broadway WWTP 99.83% 4 Enterococcus 99.87% 3 Enterococcus, Max Flow Oso WRP 99.96% 1 Enterococcus 100.00% 0 Whitecap WWTP 99.88% 1 Enterococcus 99.76% 2 Enterococcus It is a credit to the operating staff at each facility that they have been able to keep the facilities running and in compliance with its NPDES permit over 99% of the time. 1.1.2.2 Assessment Approach The assessment was conducted using a multidisciplinary approach including process, process mechanical, structural, electrical, instrumentation and controls and HVAC mechanical perspectives. The following WWTP areas were included as part of the assessment and were tailored to meet the processes at each facility. Area 01: Site Development/ SCADA Area 02: Influent Pump Station/ Control Building Area 03: Grit Removal Area 04: Primary Treatment Area 05: Secondary Treatment Area 06: Effluent Filtration Area 07: Disinfection Area 08: Outfall Area 09: Thickening Area 10: Aerobic Digestion Area 11: Anaerobic Digestion Area 12: Biogas System Area 13: Flood Management The goal of the condition assessment was to identify specific processes and equipment needed to maintain the facility to meet the current NPDES permit requirements and reduce operating costs over the next 15 -years. In preparation for the assessment, Stantec prepared a standardized Facility Assessment Form (FAF) for each facility and process area. Each FAF includes a general cover sheet, condition ratings and description, and individual discipline specific sections that detail the observations of the assessment Team for each process area. Condition ratings and subsequent descriptions are included in Table 1-8. Path C R G kaiokTisch &use November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 16 C Stantec LNV Table 1-8 Physical Condition Ratings and Descriptions Condition Grade Description Very Good Sound, modern structure or equipment, operable and well-maintained Good As "Very Good", but showing some minor signs of deterioration. Routine refurbishment and maintenance required. Fair Functionally sound, but appearance significantly affected by deterioration. Structure is marginal in its capacity to prevent leakage. Mechanical and electrical plant and components function adequately but with some reduced efficiency and minor problems. Poor Deterioration has significant effect on performance of asset due to leakage or other structural problems. Mechanical and electrical components function but require significant maintenance to remain operational. Very Poor Serious structural problems having detrimental effect on performance of the asset. Will require major overhaul/ replacement of the asset in the short term. All facilities were inspected between January 20, 2016 and January 27, 2016. The purpose of this effort was to evaluate the facility, estimate the costs to upgrade the facility and to allocate those costs based on five year increments beginning in the current year and ending at year fifteen. The following is a summary of the findings. Additional studies that are recommended are also included. All WWTPs, except New Broadway, Whitecap and Laguna Madre, currently use coarse bubble diffusers in the aeration system. Due to the inherent lower energy efficiency of this technology and the increased operating costs, this technology is proposed to be replaced at each facility. A summary of the assessment results for each facility is presented in the text that follows. Detailed inspection information maybe found in the detailed physical condition survey report provided as a stand-alone document. 1.1.2.3 Allison WWTP The facility was rated as "Poor" overall. The impact of age, the wastewater and local environment, combined with the lack of capital improvements, has taken its toll on the facility. The most recent capital improvements corrected major deficiencies in the headworks, but did not make modifications to other portions of the process. The facility continues to be operated using outdated technology which hinders management's ability to implement efficiencies and cost savings in the operations. 1.1.2.4 Greenwood WWTP The facility is rated as "Poor". The impact of age, the wastewater and local environment, combined with the lack of capital improvements, has taken its toll on the facility. The facility continues to be operated using outdated technology which hinders management's ability to bring out efficiencies and cost savings in the operations. The NPDES permit requires the initiation of an "engineering and financial plan" when the plant flows reach 75% of the design capacity. The 2015 flows indicate that this milestone has been achieved. An evaluation of the current UV disinfection system is proposed. The facility is subject to flooding. A study is proposed to review and suggest the implementation of a strategy to protect the facility from flooding. 1.1.2.5 Laguna Madre WWTP The facility is rated as "Fair". This rating is primarily due to the on-going construction which will add state-of-the- art improvements to the headworks. The impact of age, the wastewater and the local environment, combined with the lack of capital improvements, has taken its toll on the remainder of the facility. The current on-going capital improvements will correct several deficiencies, but will not correct them all. The facility continues to be operated using outdated technology which hinders management's ability to implement efficiencies and cost savings in the operations. 1.1.2.6 New Broadway WWTF The facility should be rated as "Very Good" when complete. The facility was put into limited service in 2014. The effluent filter was given a "Poor" rating. It is still operational, but in need of replacement or removal from service. There was one "Very Poor" rating given. A concrete construction joint in the aeration basins was actively leaking. There were also several poor ratings given for concrete expansion joint issues in the aeration basin area. An evaluation of disinfection alternatives, including UV, Chlorine, and filtration is recommended. The UV system is currently being operated at full capacity, although the facility flows are 58% of design flow. 17 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse 1.1.2.7 Oso WRP The facility is rated as "Poor". The impact of age, the wastewater and local environment, combined with the lack of capital improvements, has taken its toll on the facility. When a change in the NPDES permit required ammonia removal, temporary pumps were set up and a process modification from contact stabilization to conventional activated sludge was initiated. Along with breakpoint chlorination, the facility was in compliance with its NPDES permit 100% of the time. These interim pumping arrangements were still in operation during the inspection. The facility continues to be operated using outdated technology which hinders management's ability to implement efficiencies and cost savings in the operations. An evaluation of breakpoint chlorination and ammonia removal and the impacts for bacteria limits is proposed. 1.1.2.8 Whitecap WWTP The facility is rated as "Poor". The impact of age, the wastewater and local environment, combined with the lack of capital improvements, has taken its toll on the facility. There are several capital improvements proposed by others. These projects are focused and will correct several deficiencies, but will not correct them all. The facility continues to be operated using outdated technology which hinders management's ability to bring about efficiencies and cost savings in the operations. 1.1.2.9 Williams Liff Station The facility is rated as "Fair". The impact of age, the wastewater and local environment, combined with the lack of capital improvements, has had an impact on the facility. LNV ® Stantec 1.1.2.10 Woolridge Liff Station The facility is rated as "Fair". The impact of age, the wastewater and local environment, combined with the lack of capital improvements, has had an impact on the facility. 1.1.2.11 Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) As part of the assessment, an Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) was developed for required upgrades at each facility and each process area within the facility. The OPC is based on the Teams assessment on when those systems would need to be upgraded over the next 15 -years. These costs were derived from previous reports and the Teams understanding of the local market. Where it was determined that improvements were planned, but not yet under construction, the costs were included in the OPC. Where a construction contract had been issued by the City, the costs for the upgrades were not included in the summary. Where further evaluations were required to better define a solution, an evaluation phase was added followed by an estimated cost. These evaluations are defined by year and are discussed in each facility cost breakdown by year in the Physical Condition Report. Costs for all intervals are based on 2016 dollar terms and are not inflated. Costs for Engineering Services were assumed to be 15%, City Administrative Services 10%, and a Contingency was applied at 30%. The estimated costs for required upgrades, by facility, are summarized here as Table 1-9. Table 1-9 Summary of Required Upgrade Costs by Facility Facility/Years 0-5 Years 6-10 Years 11-15 Years 16-20 Years Total Allison WWTP $13,207,000 $3,506,000 $2,467,000 $937,000 $20,117,000 Greenwood WWTP $14,398,000 $31,011,000 $5,174,000 $10,395,000 $60,978,000 LagunaMadreWWTP $6,581,000 $408,000 $428,000 $1,306,000 $8,723,000 New Broadway WWTP $20,624,000 $3,319,000 $173,000 $702,000 $24,818,000 OsoWRP $53,918,000 $3,431,000 $6,395,000 $17,679,000 $81,423,000 Whitecap WWTP $18,730,000 $213,000 $1,837,000 $2,154,000 $22,934,000 Williams LS $452,000 $1,250,000 $56,000 $1,758,000 Woolridge LS $444,000 $1,250,000 $56,000 $1,750,000 Incremental Costs $128,354,000 $41,888,000 $18,974,000 $33,285,000 $222,501,000 vi G C R kailo "` TischlerSise November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 18 Stantec LNV Detailed tables which outline the capital costs for the recommendations can be found in each of the facility sections of the physical condition report. 1.1.3 Existing Operations Assessment 1.1.3.1 Operations Assessment Overview The consulting team performed a review of the current operation and maintenance (O&M) practices at the City's six wastewater treatment plants. This assessment did not include the City's lift stations or collection system. The collection system is being assessed by the City under a long term program as discussed in Section 1.1.4. The primary objectives of the operations assessment included reviewing the existing operating and maintenance (O&M) budgets and practices at each of the six plants, benchmarking O&M costs against other similar sized operations in the country, and identifying potential O&M cost savings through operations improvement. In addition, the consulting team conducted a staffing level benchmarking effort at each plant. 1.1.3.2 O&M Cost Drivers The major costs in providing wastewater treatment services can be broken down into 3 major measurable categories. These categories are: Personnel costs, Power costs, and Chemical costs. These benchmarks were selected because they are typically the largest budget line items and there is sufficient benchmarking data to compare the City's cost to others. Personnel costs are typically the largest budgeted costs. These costs are driven by Federal, State, and local requirements. Local requirements include City Policy and Department practice. Examples of "Local Requirements" would include such things as the number of holidays per year, the accrual and taking of vacation and sick leave, general training requirements, and employee benefit packages. Examples of "Departmental Practice" would include, plant process staffing and employee callout for overtime. The operations assessment focused on "Departmental Practice". Power costs are driven by any number of physical restraints. Facility condition and equipment, controls and operating practices were the focus of the operations assessment. Chemical costs are driven by process requirements and controls available to maximize their effectiveness. Current equipment and operating practices were reviewed. In addition, the age of the equipment and the level of automation needed to control the equipment have a significant impact on the ability to reduce operating costs. In five of the six facilities, equipment and control upgrades have not kept up with current industry standards. 1.1.3.3 Benchmarking The primary source for benchmarking the City's operation was the National Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA) "Opportunities & Challenges in Clean Water Utility Financing and Management - NACWA Financial Survey, July 2015" (NACWA Study). This report contains information reported from over one hundred utilities across the United States for 2013. Additional data from other sources was also used where additional comparisons provided clarity to the parameters measured and recommendations provided. The comparison data from the City was the 2016 Wastewater Department Amended Budgets and the 2015 actual plant flows. Additionally, power usage for all facilities for the period October, 2014 through September, 2015 was also used. 1.1.3.4 Overall Comparisons Personnel costs are the largest single treatment cost. These currently account for 23.1% ($4.18 M) of the total facility budgets. The NACWA Study compared the number of staff for treatment and biosolids operations per million gallons per day of wastewater treated. The overall staffing benchmarking is summarized here in Table 1-10. Table 1-10 Overall Staffing Benchmarking Data Source Staffing/MG NACWA Study 1.8 City 2.1 (2015 Flow) City City 1.9 (80% Design Flow) 1.45 (Design Flow) This metric is influenced by the flow into the facilities and the level of automation. The NACWA Study does not differentiate based on the percent of design capacity. Typically staffing levels do not increase due to increased flow. Staffing of small facilities is typically higher on an MGD basis than larger facilities. The City compares favorably to the national average in the aggregate. Possible staffing adjustments are discussed in the text below as well as in the detailed assessment report enclosed in Appendix A. Overall, the amount of day to day maintenance should increase. During the walk through, the condition of the systems indicated that the facilities would be served by an increase in the level of maintenance provided. Power Costs are the second highest treatment cost. Power currently accounts for 21.3% ($3.682 M) of the total facilities budgets. 19 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse The NACWA Study compared the electrical costs per million gallons per day of wastewater treated. The benchmarking of power costs against the national averages is presented in Table 1-11. Table 1-11 Overall Power Benchmarking ($/MG Treated) Electrical Cost ($)/MG Data Source Treated NACWA Study $202.74 City $340.00 The City's costs appear to be 40.3% higher than the national average. This is influenced by the unit cost of electricity, the condition and number of facilities, types of aeration and pumping employed and the amount of automation at each facility. An additional metric is the energy usage per million gallons per day treated (kWh/MGD). This metric provides a more realistic comparison since the unit cost of electricity is not considered. The energy usage per million gallons treated is presented here in Table 1-12. Table 1-12 Overall Power Benchmarking (kWh/MG) Data Source Electrical Energy Usage (kWh/MG Treated) NACWA Study 1,677 Wisconsin Best Practice (1 - 5 MGD) 1,650 Wisconsin Best practice (> 5 MGD) 1,760 City (1 - 5 MGD) (Allison, Laguna Madre, New Broadway, Whitecap) 3,160 City (> 5 MGD) (Greenwood, Oso) 3,234 City (Total) 3,227 These metrics indicate that the City's current average electrical usage is approximately 192% of benchmarked data. There are numerous metrics available that compare power consumption, both overall and by process. The data varies based on the extent to which energy saving process changes have been implemented. The typical energy usage by process or activity is summarized here as Table 1-13. Table 1-13 Typical Process Energy Usage in a Wastewater Treatment Facility Typical Energy Usage Process (% of Total) Aeration 53%to 67% Pumping 14% to 21% Lighting 3% to 8% Other Loads 11elt' C R G 4%to 30% kaiak Tiscff lee ise LNV ® Stantec Aeration is the major source of power usage in the wastewater treatment plant. The efficiency of oxygen transfer to water, as well as the efficiency of pumping and controlling the air flow has significant energy impacts. The New Broadway WWTP is equipped with fine bubble diffusion, variable speed blowers, and DO monitoring and control. The Laguna Madre and Whtiecap WWTPs use fine bubble diffusers but no blower modulation or DO control. The remaining facilities have coarse bubble diffusion, no blower modulation and no DO monitoring or control. Similarly, process pumping is the second major source for power usage. The New Broadway WWTP was installed with variable speed drives on most pumping applications. All other facilities have limited variable speed applications. Variable speed drives allow for the pumping of process flows to meet the demand of the treatment system. It has been reported that a 20% reduction in speed would reduce power input by 50%. This savings would be realized where speed variation over a day would be significant enough to require avariable speed pumping application. Motor replacement costs should be reviewed in the context of life cycle costs. Energy efficient motors, although having a higher first cost, have a lower life cycle cost when considering 96% of the life cycle cost are power costs. Power costs for solids processing and disinfection are reported in the literature as 20% and 1%, respectively. The results of the operations assessment suggest the City has the potential to reduce power costs by approximately $1.7 M annually. In addition, many electric utilities provide grants to assist wastewater utilities in the study and implementation of energy reduction efforts. These grants further reduce the implementation costs. An energy survey and power usage study should be conducted to better understand where these savings can be achieved and the cost of capital improvements necessary to obtain these savings. Chemical Costs are the third highest treatment cost. These currently account for 12.9% ($2.342 M) of the total facility budgets. The NACWA Study compared the Chemical costs per million gallons per day of wastewater treated. The overall chemical cost per million gallons treated is presented here in Table 1-14. Table 1-14 Overall Chemical Cost Benchmark ($/ MG Treated) Chemical Cost ($)/MG Data Source Treated NACWA Study $99.14 City $216.00 Chemical costs are 218% higher than the national average. November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 20 Stantec LNV The City uses chemicals in the treatment process for two primary purposes, disinfection to meet the enterococcus permit limit and for sludge conditioning as part of the belt filter press and centrifuge process. There are various processes employed to meet the permitted bacteria limits. UV disinfection is employed at the Whitecap WWTP. Disinfection via chlorination/ dechlorination is employed at Allison WWTP, Oso WRP and Laguna Madre WWTP, and a combination of UV and chlorination/ dechlorination is employed at Greenwood WWTP and New Broadway WWTP. Generally, where chlorination/ dechlorination is used control systems should be inspected, repaired or replaced so that optimization efforts can be implemented to reduce chemical usage and associated costs. An evaluation has been proposed to review the disinfection, and filtration issues at each facility. 1.1.3.5 Summary of Benchmarking Results by Facility A summary of the benchmarking results by treatment facility is presented here as Table 1-15. The detailed assessments of each facility are presented in the assessment report enclosed in Appendix A. Table 1-15 Summary of Benchmarking Results by Facility Category NACWA Benchmark City Comparison Notes Allison WWTP Staffing • 1.8/MG • 2.9/MG • 1.6/MG (design flow) • Condition of facility and lack of automation controls precludes staff reductions. • Once facility brought up to standard there are opportunities to reallocate staff (potential to go to 5 -day work week and reduce staff by 2 FTEs). Power • $202.74/MG treated • 1,677 kW hr/ MG treated • $430/MG treated • 2,201 kW-hr/MG treated • With upgrade of plant systems potential savings is $107,000/year. Chemical • $99.14/MGD • $254/MGD • Chemical costs approximately 218% higher than national average. Greenwood WWTP Staffing • 1.8/MG • 1.6/MG (2015) • 1.2/MG (Design flow) • There are no automated controls and all of the facilities are operated manually • Condition of the facility precludes recommendation for staffing reductions. Power • $202.74/MG treated • 1,677 kW hr/ MG treated • $294/MG treated • 2,823 kW-hr/MG treated • With upgrade of plant systems potential savings is $259,000/year. • Further use of biogas could potentially increase the power savings. Chemical • $99.14/MGD • $87/MGD • Chemical costs are in line with expectations. Laguna Madre WWTP Staffing • 1.8/MG • 4.0/MG (2015) • 2.7/MG (Design flow) • Condition of the facility precludes recommendation for staffing reductions. • Consider going to a 5 -day work week at this facility • SCADA upgrades could allow sharing of staff between Laguna Madre and Whitecap Power • $202.74/MG treated • 1,677 kW hr/ MG treated • $192/MG treated • 2,791 kW-hr/MG treated • With upgrade of plant systems potential savings is $57,000/year. Chemical • $99.14/MGD • $151/MGD 21 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse LNV Stantec Category NACWA Benchmark City Comparison Notes New Broadway WWTP Staffing • 1.8/MG • 2.4/MG (2015) • 1.4/MG (Design flow) • Staffing levels compare favorably with bench mark levels. Power • $202.74/MG treated • 1,677 kW hr/ MG treated • $355/MG treated • 3,224 kW-hr/MG treated • Power consumption 195% of bench mark. • With optimization of plant systems potential savings is $307,000/ year. Chemical • $99.14/MGD • $114/MGD Oso WRP Staffing • 1.8/MG • 1.2/MG (2015) • 1.0/MG (Design flow) • Staffing levels are below the national average • Consider going to an 8 hr/day 7 -day work week. This change could allow the staffto be restructured allocating FTEs toward maintenance activities. Power • $202.74/MG treated • 1,677 kW hr/ MG treated • $356/MG treated • 3,545 kW-hr/MG treated • Power consumption 201% of bench mark. • With optimization of plant systems potential savings is $850,000/ year. Chemical • $99.14/MGD • $333/MGD • Chemical costs are excessive. Alternatives to breakpoint chlorination need to be investigated. Whitecap WWTP Staffing • 1.8/MG • 7.0/MG (2015) • 3.2/MG (Design flow) • Staffing levels are above the national average • With a modern SCADA system it maybe possible to reduce staffing by 2 FTEs. Power • $202.74/MG treated • 1,677 kW hr/ MG treated • $391/MG treated • 4,423 kW-hr/MG treated • Power consumption 268% of bench mark. • With optimization of plant systems potential savings is $61,000/ year. Chemical • $99.14/MGD • $12/MGD • Chemical feed rates are below the national average. The primary conclusions that can be drawn for each of the individual facilities can be summarized as follows: Allison WWTP • 8 operating staff (operates 7 days per week 8 hours per day - maximum staffing on any given day is 5). • Belt press operation is 5 days per week • Operational control of the existing secondary treatment process is limited. • A review of the current solids retention time (SRT) control practices is recommended. • The existing sodium hypochlorite system requires replacement or additional maintenance. • Equipment issues with the thickeners and final clarifiers requires the plant staff to spend an inordinate amount of time dealing with floatables. • The polymer batching system for the belt filter press needs to be repaired or replaced. • The overall level of day to day maintenance needs to increase. Path C R G kaiak use Greenwood WWTP • 10 operating staff (operates 7 days per week 8 hours per day). • Belt press operation is 5 to 6 days per week. • Grit and screenings facility are in disrepair and are difficult to operate (rags are a problem throughout the facility). • The primary clarifiers are in need of rehabilitation to improve reliability. • The aeration basins use coarse bubble diffusers and there is no aeration control. • SRT control methods at the facility should be reviewed and improved. • The DAF unit is currently being used as a sludge holding tank. Primary sludge is pumped here and WAS is pumped directly to the anaerobic digesters (thickening of WAS would increase digester capacity). There are some efficiencies to be released by re- instating sludge thickening. November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 22 Stantec LNV Laguna Madre WWTP • 8 operating staff (operates 7 days per week 8 hours per day - maximum number of staff 5). • Belt press operation is currently on an as needed basis. • The condition of the existing aeration equipment makes it difficult for the staff to maintain operational control. Failed valves and poor handrail and walkways make it difficult to access and operate the basins. • The aeration basins use fine bubble diffusers but there is no dissolved oxygen (DO) control or blower control. There are few variable speed drives used at the facility and those that exist, are run in manual. • A review of current SRT control practices is recommended. • Overall, the amount of day to day maintenance at the facility should increase. New Broadway WWTP • Currently, the facility has 11 employees. The facility is manned 8 hours per day, 7 days per week. The maximum staffing on any day is 5. • The centrifuge is operated 5 days per week. • The operations staff took over operation of the facility without the necessary vendor training and completion of the SCADA system, including some field sensors. • Some of the instrumentation, meant to promote better operation and operational efficiency, is not in working order. This appears to be a result of outstanding deficiencies from the construction phase. • New Broadway is the only facility to accept hauled waste. During our inspection, materials were dumped that may have caused the aeration DO levels to drop near zero. Oso WRP • The facility has 16 employees. The facility is manned 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. • Skid mounted pumps have been added at various locations throughout the plant to replace failed equipment, add additional capacity, or make process modifications. The headworks are atemporary arrangement with inadequate ventilation which poses a safety hazard for plant staff. • The grit and screenings facilities are generally ineffective in removing material from the influent. • The aeration basins use coarse bubble diffusers and there is no DO control or blower control. • The breakpoint chlorination is a very inefficient method of ammonia control and should be reviewed. • Overall, the amount of day to day maintenance should increase. Whitecap WWTP • Currently, the facility has 8 employees. The facility is manned 8 hours per day, 7 days per week. The maximum staffing on any day is 5. • The aeration basins use coarse bubble diffusers and there is no DO control or blower control. There are no variable speed drives used at the facility. • The staff operates the blowers at 100%. This is being done to keep the MLSS and heavier materials, not removed in preceding processes in suspension. MLSS was also being carried above normal in the basins. This practice adds additional costs to the process. • The staff cleans the UV system every day. This practice is labor intensive. The staff has found that the practice has decreased the likelihood of enterococcus limit failure. 1.1.4 Collection System Remediation The City completed a city wide hydraulic assessment of the wastewater collection system in 2015 to assist in identifying collection system infrastructure requiring remediation. The analysis results are summarized in the report entitled: "Wastewater Collection System Modelling and Recommendations Final Report" dated April 2015. Sewer lines larger than 10 -inches in diameter and smaller critical lines were modeled using field obtained survey data. All other lines were modelled assuming TCEQ minimum sewer slopes. The hydraulic assessment was based upon the 5 -year 24-hour storm. The hydraulic modeling identified potential capacity constraints and provided an estimate of the associated capital cost to eliminate these constraints through pipe replacement. The estimated pipe replacement cost was approximately $311 M based upon 2015 dollars. The report recommended that the identified capacity constraints undergo a remedial measures analysis that considers infiltration/inflow (I&I) reduction, monitoring, rehabilitation, maintenance, and flow diversion in addition to convey and treat. The City has embarked on a remedial measures analysis and implementation program to identify potential I&I reduction, rehabilitation, and maintenance needs. City staff believes the $311 M capital expenditure identified in the hydraulic analysis report is an upper bound on the remediation cost and has prepared a revised estimate for budgeting purposes. In order to arrive at a realistic remediation budget the City used historical SSO records in conjunction with previous utility department experience. The City compared the sewer system map showing historical SSO locations against the identified potential hydraulic constraints identified in the modeling exercise. Areas where the model predicted a sewer overflow in the design storm and where previous SSOs have been observed (referred to as Type I priorities) were identified for further consideration. Areas where the modeling predicted an overflow but it was not 23 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Haim C x halo TtscFc ise 6iG., , ._... clear if this was truly the result of a capacity constraint (referred to as Type II priorities) were also identified for further consideration. It was assumed that 95% and 75% of the Type I and Type II works would need to be completed based upon historical City experience. The resulting replacement cost for these projects is estimated at $195.5 M. In addition, the City has identified an overall budget of $148.1 M for capacity remediation that includes sewer rehabilitation (pipe lining and repair), ongoing sewer cleaning, and flow monitoring. The cash flow model for all options considered for this plan development therefore includes the following collection system expenditures: • Pipe Replacements - $195.5 M • Capacity Remediation - $148.1 M • Force mains - $14.3 M • Lift stations - $8.6 M The City has had a number of reported sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) over the last several years and also experienced apparent effluent permit non-compliance events at a number of their treatment facilities. The City is currently negotiating a settlement under a proposed Consent Decree with the state and federal government regarding the City's wastewater collection system and its wastewater treatment plants. The enforcement negotiations began with the issuance of six federal LNV ® Stantec administrative orders (one affiliated with each of the six WWTP discharge permits) in Fall 2011. The negotiations are currently still ongoing and based on having one overall Consent Decree, with both collection system remediation and remedial works at the plants incorporated into this proposed Consent Decree. 1.2. Future Requirements The optimal long-range strategy for the wastewater collection and treatment systems must address future requirements including future growth and regulatory requirements. Anticipated development and future population and flow projections are presented in Sections 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 respectively. Anticipated future regulatory requirements are summarized in Section 1.2.3. Future treatment requirements are presented here in Section 1.2.4. 1.2.1 Future Population Growth and Development Trends The US Census 2014 population estimate for the City of Corpus Christi is 320,438. A commonly used organization for population projection is the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB). Figure 1-8 below indicates the TWDB population forecast for the City of Corpus Christi every 10 years from 2020 to 2070. As shown in the figure, the population for the City is projected to grow to approximately 400,000 persons by around 2055. Figure 1-8 Population Projections for the City of Corpus Christi (2020 to 2070) 420,000 400,000 380.000 0 0 360,004 a 0 • - 3,40,000 3`40,000 320.000 300,000 City of Corpus Christi - Population Projections 40`l, 129 —6-2016 TWDB Population Projections for Carpus Christi 2020 2[730 2040 2050 2060 2070 Path C R G kalok use November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 24 Stantec LNV In order to distribute the anticipated population increase by service area, it is necessary to establish where and when growth is anticipated to occur. The City provided mapping of the expected growth areas in the City for the next 10, 20 and 30 years. These GIS maps were then overlaid on the wastewater service areas and the growth per area established for each of these 10 -year planning horizons. Details of the methodology are included in the Flow and Load Projection memorandum enclosed in Appendix B of this report. The expected development area and relative percent growth for each of the six existing sewer service areas is presented here in Table 1-16. It should be noted that all the wastewater service areas have different growth rates. Some wastewater service areas are limited in the amount of area available to be developed where other wastewater service areas have a large amount of area that is available for development. For example, it is anticipated by the year 2036 the Broadway WWTP service area will have been fully developed and the service area will not contribute any significant growth for the remaining years. On the other hand the Oso WRP has a large service area and is expected to be continually developed farther into the future as the City continues to grow and expand into its Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) area. Strong growth is anticipated in the Greenwood area, particularly in the middle decade under review. Slow initial growth is expected in the Allison service area, picking up considerably during the final decade of the review. The Laguna Madre and Whitecap areas are both expected to see steady modest growth throughout the 30 years. Table 1-16 Projected Growth by Existing Sewer Service Area Facility Allison 10 Years 20 Years 30 Years Growth (Acres) Percent Growth Growth (Acres) Percent Growth Growth (Acres) Percent Growth 569 7% 339 4% 2,594 31% Broadway 98 1% 279 3% - 0% Greenwood 1,456 17% 4,399 51% 1,187 14% Laguna Madre 848 10% 559 6% 1,257 15% Oso 4,843 56% 2,474 29% 2,244 26% Whitecap 777 9% 607 7% 1,205 14% Total 8,590 100% 8,656 100% 8,488 100% Using the percentage area growth by service area, a population growth estimate was developed for each service area in 5 year increments. The projected population by existing sewer service area is presented here in Table 1-17. Table 1-17 Projected Population by Sewer Service Area Year Facility Allison 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 29,926 30,826 31,726 32,312 32,898 35,774 38,650 40,334 Broadway 38,926 39,082 39,237 39,720 40,202 40,202 40,202 40,202 Greenwood 56,003 58,305 60,607 68,215 75,823 77,139 78,455 79,226 Laguna Madre 19,891 21,232 22,572 23,538 24,505 25,898 27,292 28,109 Oso 151,890 159,549 167,207 171,486 175,765 178,254 180,742 182,199 Whitecap 11,849 13,078 14,307 15,356 16,406 17,742 19,078 19,860 Total 308,485 322,071 335,657 350,628 365,599 375,010 384,420 389,930 25 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse LNV ® Stantec 1.2.2 Projected Flow and Load The annual average flow projections for each facility were derived using the population projection described above and an estimate of the future per capita flow. In order to bracket the potential flow estimates, two levels of per capita flows were used. An upper bound flow estimate was developed based on the highest annual average per capita flow observed in each applicable service area. This HIGH estimate is shown in Table 1-18 and results in a total annual average wastewater capacity requirement by 2045 of approximately 40 MGD. Table 1-18 Flow Projection by Service Area (MGD) - High Estimated Flow by Year (MGD) Facility Allison Per capita flow (gpcd) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 100 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.0 Broadway 110 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 Greenwood 110 6.4 6.7 7.5 8.3 8.5 8.6 8.7 Laguna Madre 100 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 Oso 100 16.0 16.7 17.1 17.6 17.8 18.1 18.2 Whitecap 110 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.2 Total 32.3 33.3 34.7 36.3 37.9 38.9 39.8 40.4 A second, lower bound estimate was developed using the average per capita flow observed over the last three years. This LOW estimate is shown in Table 1-19 and shows a total annual average wastewater capacity requirement by 2045 of approximately 34 MGD. Table 1-19 Flow Projection by Service Area (MGD) - Low Facility Estimated Flow by Year (MGD) Per capr'd flow (gpcd) 2015 2.8 2020 2.9 2025 2.9 2030 3.0 2035 3.2 2040 3.5 2045 3.6 Allison 90 Broadway 104 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 Greenwood 99 5.8 6.0 6.8 7.5 7.6 7.8 7.8 Laguna Madre 78 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 Oso 76 12.1 12.7 13.0 13.4 13.5 13.7 13.8 Whitecap 95 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 Total 27.6 28.8 30.1 31.5 32.3 33.1 33.6 It should be noted that these projections assume that growth density in each of the service areas will be of a similar mix of population per acre and that the flow per capita will remain in a similar range as the recent historical averages. These simplifications are considered appropriate for the purposes of this planning study, but a more rigorous estimate of flow projections would be needed before design of any new facilities. Using the flow projections developed above, an assessment was made for each facility of the timing for necessary plant expansions. Currently the combined average annual wastewater flow to the six facilities is approximately 30 MGD and the current design capacity for the six WWTPs is 42.7 MGD. Table 1-20, shows the current (2015) flows as compared to the design capacity. Path C R kailo "` TischlerSise G November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 26 Stantec LNV Table 1-20 Current Facility Capacities Now and in 2035 Facility Allison Existing Capacity (MGD) Actual 2015 Flow % of Capacity ADF (MGD) 2 -HR Peak (MGD) ADF (MGD) % of Capacity High Low Estimate Estimate 5.0 15.0 2.7 55% 64% 72% Broadway 8.0 20.0 4.3 54% 52% 55% Greenwood 8.0 24.0 6.3 79% 95% 106% Laguna Madre 3.0 9.0 2.1 69% 67% 86% Oso 16.2 98 13.3 82% 84% 110% Whitecap 2.5 7.5 1.4 56% 67% 78% Totals 42.7 193.5 30.1 According to the Texas Administrative Code (TAC) 305.126(a) "whenever flow measurements for any sewage treatment plant facility in the state reaches 75 percent of the permitted average daily or annual average flow for three consecutive months, the permittee must initiate engineering and financial planning for expansion and/or upgrading of the wastewater treatment and/or collection facilities." Currently Greenwood WWTP and Oso WRP are beyond the 75 percent threshold and planning will have to take place to satisfy the TAC 305.126(a) ruling. The anticipated priority for facility expansion based solely on current flow projections is therefore: Oso, Greenwood, Laguna Madre, Whitecap, and Allison. On completion, we are not anticipating Broadway will require expansion within the next 20 to 30 years. 1.2.3 Future Regulatory Requirements The existing treatment facilities will be required to meet future regulatory requirements in addition to accommodating flow and load increases associated with development. We are anticipating future effluent nutrient limits i.e for total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP), as the most pressing and likely change to existing effluent requirements. These future limits are expected to eventually impact awastewater effluent discharge into all of the existing or potential receivers including: Oso Creek, Oso Bay, Laguna Madre, Nueces River, Nueces Bay, Corpus Christi Bay, as well as the Ship Channel. Currently, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) has issued permit limits for TN or TP for a small fraction of the Texas permittees. These limits are based on the protection of narrative water quality standards, not numeric standards. Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (TSWQS) regulate nutrients as follows: "Nutrients from permitted discharges or other controllable sources must not cause excessive growth of aquatic vegetation that impairs an existing designated, presumed, or attainable use. Site-specific nutrient criteria, nutrient permit limitations, or separate rules to control nutrients in individual watersheds are established where appropriate after notice and opportunity for public participation and proper hearing. Site-specific numeric criteria related to chlorophyll a are listed in Appendix F of §307.10 of this title." The TSWQS do not currently include numeric nutrient criteria for the receiving waters of the City's WWTPs. A change in water quality standards that includes numeric nutrient standards for the City's WWTP receiving waters would increase the likelihood that nutrient permit limits are incorporated in some or all of the existing WWTPs permits and any new WWTPs being considered in the alternatives. For the existing WWTPs, nutrient limits would require significant investment to modify or add treatment units to consistently remove nutrients from the wastewater. At this time TCEQ has not proposed additional numeric nutrient standards for the 2017 standards revision. In previous standards revision cycles, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the TCEQ have focused on numeric standards for chlorophyll -a in freshwater reservoirs. Today, some of the State's reservoirs have chlorophyll -a standards, but many still do not. Since these standards were adopted, both the EPA and TCEQ have stepped back from the focus on nutrients. At this time, the TCEQ is still working on its approaches to nutrient standards for reservoirs, rivers, and bays/estuaries. We believe that it will still be some time before the TCEQ or EPAwill be able to effectively adopt nutrient standards in bays, estuaries, or tidal segments as are found in the Corpus Christi area. Whether TCEQ would issue TN limits, TP limits or limits for both TN and TP for the City's WWTPs is unknown. However, such limits are anticipated to begin to appear in permits discharging to marine waters in the next 10 to 15 years. Nitrogen is usually considered the controlling nutrient in saltwater bodies, so nitrogen would likely be the initial focus of such limits. In addition, it might be expected that a moderate range of controls would be implemented initially, such as 8 milligrams per liter (mg/L) TN and 1 mg/L TP. Over subsequent permitting cycles and water quality standards revisions, such limits might be reduced in at least some of the larger discharges or for discharges to more sensitive water bodies. For Texas, a lower limit on TN of around 3 mg/L might be expected. Limits on TP might drop to around 0.3 mg/L, where deemed necessary to protect receiving water bodies. A more extensive review of future potential regulatory requirements, biosolids management, and odor control management are enclosed here in Appendix C, D, and E. 27 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 tir Rm mc G kaifo �` Tischi era LNV ® Stantec 1.2.4 Future Treatment Requirements The most significant aspect of the treatment requirements evaluation is that all or most of the WWTPs will likely be subject to nutrient limits in the foreseeable future. We are anticipating that moderate nutrient limits would be implemented initially with limits becoming increasingly stringent with time. We would anticipate initial total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) limits of 8 mg/L and 1 mg/L respectively with limits eventually being lowered to limit of technology levels (TN < 3 mg/L and TP <0.3 mg/L). We are anticipating the most sensitive receivers, and the associated treatment facilities, will receive nutrient limits first including Oso Creek, Nueces Bay and estuary, and Oso Bay. This is expected to be followed by the Laguna Madre and Ship Channel over time. Biosolids management at the six (6) city wastewater facilities consists of aerobic digestion, biosolids dewatering, and trucking to landfill disposal. We are anticipating the current practice will not change under the status quo. However, consolidation at a larger plant site or sites would allow an opportunity to implement anaerobic digestion and realize the associated energy recovery and lower operating costs. The anticipated biosolids treatment train at the consolidation sites would include sludge thickening, anaerobic digestion, centrifuge dewatering, and dewatered cake storage. The overarching direction of the wastewater industry is towards increased levels of treatment and resource recovery. Newer plants are typically designed to maximize resource recovery through biogas production and installation of a combined heat and power (CHP) system. We are anticipating the pressure to maximize effluent reuse will continue and anticipate industrial reuse will eventually be implemented. Current EPA regulatory initiatives such as the implementation of effluent viral limits will require increased disinfection limits. The land area requirements for all new plant sites should therefore be sufficient to accommodate these future anticipated initiatives. The projected treatment requirements by plant site are summarized here in Tables 2-21 through 2-23. Table 1-21 Anticipated Future Nutrient Removal Requirements Plant Site Allison (existing plant) Anticipated Nutrient Requirements 0-5 year 5-10 year 10-20 year 20+ years none none TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<3 mg/L, TP<0.3 mg/L Allison (new consolidated plant site) TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<3 mg/L, TP<0.3 mg/L Broadway none none none none Greenwood TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<3 mg/L, TP<0.3 mg/L Oso TN<8 mg/L, TP<1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<3 mg/L, TP<0.3 mg/L Laguna Madre (existing plant) none none none none Laguna Madre (new consolidated plant site) TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<3 mg/L, TP<0.3 mg/L Whitecap none none none none Southwest Site TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<3 mg/L, TP<0.3 mg/L Southeast Site TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<3 mg/L, TP<0.3 mg/L North Site TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<8 mg/L, TP <1 mg/L TN<3 mg/L, TP<0.3 mg/L nate C R G kaiakTisch &use November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 28 Stantec LNV Total nitrogen and phosphorus limits of 8 mg/L and 1 mg/L respectively can be met via a number of conventional biological nutrient removal (BNR) technologies including the Modified Ludzack-Ettinger (MLE) process with chemical phosphorus removal, 3 -stage Bardenpho, 5 -Stage Bardenpho, and Modified Johannesbourg (MJB) processes to name but a few. We are assuming the City would install a 3 -stage Bardenpho or MJB process at those plants needing to meet these limits for the purposes of this report. The lower effluent limits of < 3 mg/L and <0.3 mg/L nitrogen and phosphorus respectively would require exogenous carbon addition and effluent filtration. We are assuming the required process would include post denitrification filters with methanol addition. Table 1-22 Anticipated Biosolids Management Approach Plant Site Allison (existing plant) Anticipated Biosolids Management Approach Sludge Thickening Digestion Sludge Dewatering Energy Recovery Gravity thickener Aerobic Belt Press None Allison (new consolidated plant site) Rotary Drum Thickener Anaerobic Centrifuge Yes (CHP) New Broadway Gravity Thickener Aerobic Centrifuge None Greenwood Rotary Drum Thickener Anaerobic Centrifuge Yes (CHP) Oso (upgraded and expanded) Gravity Thickener Anaerobic Belt Press Yes (CHP) Laguna Madre (existing plant) None Aerobic Belt Press No Laguna Madre (new consolidated plant site) Rotary Drum Thickener Anaerobic Centrifuge Yes (CHP) Whitecap None Aerobic Belt Press No Southwest Site Rotary Drum Thickener Anaerobic Centrifuge Yes (CHP) Southeast Site Rotary Drum Thickener Anaerobic Centrifuge Yes (CHP) North Site Rotary Drum Thickener Anaerobic Centrifuge Yes (CHP) The option for maintaining treatment at the existing sites requires flood proofing of the existing Greenwood WWTP site. A review of the associated costs suggests it is most appropriate to build a new flood proofed Greenwood WWTP on the Greenwood site adjacent the existing plant facility. As indicated above, all new plants would include anaerobic digestion facilities due to lower operating costs and associated benefit associated with energy recovery. Further, all new plant sites would include an allowance for resource recovery operations. 29 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse LNV Stantec Table 1-23 Anticipated Resource Recovery Systems Plant Site Anticipated Resource Recovery Effluen euse Phosphorus Recovery none Energy Recovery none Potential Biosolids Amendment none Allison (existing plant) none Allison (new consolidated plant site) Yes Yes Yes Yes Broadway none none none none Greenwood Yes Yes Yes Yes Oso Yes (1) none none none Laguna Madre (existing plant) none none none none Laguna Madre (new consolidated plant site) Yes Yes Yes Yes Whitecap none none none none Southwest Site Yes Yes Yes Yes Southeast Site Yes (1) Yes Yes Yes North Site Yes Yes Yes Yes (1) - It is assumed effluent reuse will be limited from these sites and confined to non -industrial uses due to the significant distance from the respective site to existing heavy industry. 1.3. Stakeholders and Stakeholder Input The consultant team and City staff conducted three open house events and several individual stakeholder meetings during the course of this study. The open houses were conducted in "drop-in" format in order to accommodate availability of the public. The three open houses were operated for approximately 5 to 6 hours from early afternoon to early evening. The purpose and objectives of these meetings are summarized here in Table 1-24. Informational materials were presented on display boards at each open house. Comment sheets were provided at each meeting and the project team also set up a project specific web site www.ccwastewaterstudy.com that displayed project information. Stakeholders provided comments on the project at the meetings by submitting written comments directly to project staff and/or through the project web site at their leisure. The project team prepared an initial stakeholders list at the start of the project which was updated throughout the project duration. The project team sent out targeted invites to project stakeholders in advance of each open house. Along with the targeted invites, the project team used several platforms to promote the public open house: • Existing City social media sites • E -newsletter - Utilized existing Plan CC 2035 address list (similar target audience) • City public access Channel 19 • Digital advertising through Caller Times and Facebook • City staff employee newsletter and notice to all department heads • Promotional assistance by local community/civic organizations to increase reach to the public • Flyers at City facilities such as libraries, senior centers and recreational centers Path C R G kaiakTisch &use November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 30 Stantec LNV The media strategy for each event included the following elements: • Media pitch in advance of each open house: Caller Times, KRIS -TV, KIII-TV, KZTV, KORO -TV Nueces County Record Star and the Corpus Christi Business News. • Media advisory sent in advance of each open house: Announcing meeting prior to meeting date as invite to briefing. • Media briefings were held one hour prior to each open house to allow media dedicated time with City staff and materials and interviews. Table 1-24 Stakeholder Engagement Meetings Meeting Number Meeting Description Date Meeting Objective 1 Open House 1 March 24, 2016 • Make the stakeholders aware of the study and the study objectives. • Assist in identifying stakeholder groups and their respective comments and concerns. • Collect stakeholder input on the study objectives and approach. 2 Meeting with Chamber of Commerce April 8, 2016 • Inform Chamber of Commerce members on purpose of study, proposed approach and schedule and update them on progress to date. 3 Open House 2 May 26, 2016 • Update stakeholders on progress made on the study. • Present options under consideration and receive stakeholder input on both the options and proposed assessment methodology. 4 Port Industries Meetin g June 23, 2016 • Update local industry on the project progress. • Discuss requirements for and industry interest in reuse water for industrial purposes. 5 Coastal Bend Bay & Estuaries Program June 29, 2016 • Update program staff on project progress. • Review program staff's specific concerns associated with maintaining return flows to the Nueces Bay and delta and the potential impact industrial reuse may have on these flows. 6 Greenwood Community Meeting July 7, 2016 • Update neighbors of the Greenwood WWTP site on the project progress. • Review alternative plans for the Greenwood site and receive comments on the project from local residents. 7 Flour Bluff Community Meeting July 14, 2016 • Update neighbors of the Laguna Madre WWTP site on the project progress. • Review alternative plans for the Laguna Madre site and receive comments on the project from local residents. 8 Oso Community Meeting July 20, 2016 • Update neighbors of the Oso WRP site on the project progress. • Review alternative plans for the Oso WRP site and receive comments on the project from local residents. 9 Open House 3 July 28, 2016 • Update stakeholders on options under consideration. • Present pre-screening and evaluation methodology for short listed options. • Present preliminary recommendation and associated rationale. • Provide an opportunity for stakeholders to comment on the recommended alternative and the project in general. 10 WE AT/ TAWWA Joint Meeting August 4, 2016 • Present study purpose and objectives to local engineering community. • Present preliminary recommendation and associated rationale. Copies of the handouts, questionnaires, and comments received from each of the open house and neighborhood meetings are provided on the project web site: www.ccwastewaterstudy.com. 31 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 C R kali©'` Tischl reBEse• The key concerns expressed by the public during the open houses and stakeholder engagement meetings included: • Minimizing user rates. • Addressing the flooding issues at the Greenwood WWTP and in the community adjacent the plant. • Maintaining environmental base flows in specific receiving streams particularly the Nueces River and Bay and the Blind Oso. • Addressing odor and nuisance issues associated with the Oso WRP. • Providing a plan that addresses future growth south of Oso Creek. Key stakeholder concerns and how these were accounted for in the servicing options development and selection are summarized in Section 1.4.4. The plan for stakeholder management for future phases of the project is addressed here in Section 2.5. 1.4. Summary of Existing Constraints A number of constraints need to be considered when developing future potential servicing options and prior to selection of a preferred wastewater servicing plan. The LNV ® Stantec consulting team conducted several background studies to identify constraints. These, along with stakeholder comments, served as critical input to developing the recommended servicing plan. 1.4.1 Pending Consent Decree The City of Corpus Christi is currently in negotiations with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding the city's wastewater system. The DOJ and EPA are alleging Corpus Christi violated the Clean Water Act (CWA) with sewer overflows, and a settlement is being negotiated for wastewater improvements. 1.4.2 Existing Treatment Plant Site Capacities The project team considered a number of potential wastewater servicing options for the City. One of the objectives of the study was to identify and confirm the potential to service some or all of the existing wastewater treatment facilities at one or more sites. Consolidating treatment operations at fewer wastewater facilities is expected to reduce annual O&M costs. One of the first steps in this analysis involved looking at each of the existing sites to confirm current site constraints and available site capacity. The results of these analyses are presented here in Table 1-25. Table 1-25 Site Capacity of Existing Wastewater Treatment Plants Plant Current Plant Capacity (MGD) Estimated Capacity Requirement (MGD) - 2045 Estimated Site Capacity (MGD) Summary of Site Constraints Oso WRP 16.2 18.2 24 • None noted Greenwood WWTP 8 8.7 24 • Existing plant located in the flood plain. • Sustaining capital spend over next 15 + years is approximately equal the cost of plant replacement. Allison 5 4 73 • The City owns a considerable amount of land adjacent the site. New Broadway 8 4.4 8 • None noted. Laguna Madre 3 2.8 30 • The city owns a considerable amount of land adjacent the site. • Aportion of the site is susceptible to flooding. The estimated site capacity accounts for the impact of the flood plain on site capacity. Whitecap 2.5 2.2 5 • None noted. Rrh C R G kaiakTisch &use November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 32 Stantec `NV 1.4.3 Summary of Existing System Constraints Several critical constraints need to be considered when developing the final wastewater servicing plan. The City has identified their key priorities as follows: • Meet regulatory compliance at all times. • Minimize user rates as much as practically possible. • Minimize capital and operating and maintenance (O&M) costs. • Provide drought resistant water to industry • Meet needs for planned development The key constraints to meeting these objectives and the way in which they were addressed in this study are summarized in Table 1-26. Table 1-26 Summary of Key Constraints and Approach to Addressing These Stakeholder Group Issue/Constraint Approach to Addressing Issue/Constraint City/Public Continued flooding at Greenwood WWTP • Build a new 'flood proof' treatment facility on the Greenwood site or transfer Greenwood flows to a new plant. • Transfer some flows from the periphery of the Greenwood to the Broadway service area to reduce flows going to the Greenwood WWTP. • Conduct remedial works in La Volla Creek to reduce flooding potential in the Creek. • Reduce Inflow/Infiltration (I/I) to reduce peak flow into the collection system City/Public High sustaining capital spend required for existing plants. • Prioritize capital projects at each plant and identify appropriate timing to spread out required cash flow. • Consolidate plants with high sustaining capital spend as quickly as possible. City/Public Minimize impact upon user rates • Assume New Broadway WWTP will be in service beyond the 2045 time horizon and transfer additional flow to plant to maximize value from facility. • Assume Whitecap WWTP will stay in service for foreseeable future due to long simple payback period. • Identify operational savings associated with the operation of the existing wastewater treatment facilities reducing costs even under the status quo. • Evaluate several consolidation options and identify options that provide optimal balance between lower O&M cost savings and most attractive capital cost spend. City Uncertainty around future of Oso WRP effluent discharge. • Identify and evaluate options that provide flexibility to consolidate Oso WRP now or at a later time. City Significant potential development south of Oso Creek. • Plan all options so that developments south of Oso Creek can be accommodated in future as/if required. City Collection system rehabilitation and upgrades required to support Consent Decree. • All options considered include upgrades and rehabilitation of collection system. City/Public Odor and other nuisance issues associated with Oso WRP. • All future servicing options considered include upgrading Oso WRP to address nuisance concerns and/or decommissioning of the facility. 33 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rein C R G kala* Tisch rise Stakeholder Group City Public Public Issue/Constraint Supply drought proof water supply for industry. Public does not want to pay for industrial reuse water out of residential sewer use rates. Members of the public concerned about the potential loss of aquatic habitat should the Oso WRP be taking out of service. LNV ( Stantec Approach to Addressing Issue/Constraint • Future servicing options considered included preliminary plans for providing reuse water to industry. • The capital and O&M costs of industrial reuse were not included in the CIP associated with wastewater user rates. • All industrial reuse capital and O&M costs will be paid solely by the benefitting industries. • City is considering construction of a small scalping plant at the Oso site to provide minimal flow to the blind Oso should the plant be taken out of service. The City would like to provide a drought proof water supply for industry using treated wastewater effluent. The Port Industries group made it clear that they are interested in receiving treated effluent if it meets their process requirements and is provided at a cost equal to or less than potable water. Members of the public voiced concerns that user rates would be used to subsidize industrial reuse water. City staff instructed the consulting team to estimate the capital and O&M cost of additional treatment to support industrial reuse for each of the servicing options under consideration. The city will develop a unit cost of reuse water that includes capital recovery and present the cost to industry. Reuse facilities will be constructed once the appropriate long term contracts have been executed with industry. The consulting team assumed the City would provide a minimum of 10 MGD of industrial reuse water within the next 10 -years using reverse osmosis treatment to reduce chloride levels. 1.5. Identification of the Preferred Wastewater Servicing Option 1.5.1 Introduction The plant upgrading and consolidation options considered for this study are presented here in Sections 1.5.2 and 1.5.3. Capital and O&M cost assumptions, estimates, and sensitivity analyses are covered in Section 1.5.4. Prescreening criteria and the results of the options pre- screening are presented in Section 1.5.5. The recommended servicing option and alternatives for improving upon this option are presented here in Section 1.5.6. "lath C R kailo "` TischlerBise G 1.5.2 Future Plant Siting Options To evaluate the potential benefit for future wastewater servicing options, a City wide review was undertaken of the current and potential new sites for locating wastewater treatment facilities. In selecting suitable treatment sites the following issues were taken into consideration: • Existing locations have advantages of existing capital investments; the precedent created by existing neighbors; and established connection to the existing wastewater collection network. • New locations must have adequate open contiguous land areas that provide at least 50 to 80 acres of available land. • Neighboring land uses can have a significant impact on the value of vacant land as well as the level of mitigation and buffers needed to avoid nuisance impacts on the public. • Ideally, new sites would be located closer to projected growth areas to match future wastewater flows. November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 34 Stantec LNV • New sites must either be near a potential discharge location or must have opportunity to connect to a suitable discharge point. The level of treatment required at a new plant will be materially impacted by the assimilative capacity of the receiving stream at the discharge location. • Sites need to be free from significant servicing or environmental constraints such as flooding potential, wetlands, railway/ highway corridors, and utility easements for gas pipelines or high voltage electrical lines. An initial desk top survey was undertaken of the larger tracks of land surrounding the existing wastewater service areas. This looked at opportunities for new sites generally located to the north, west and south of the City's built up core. It should be noted that review of potential sites was based on identifying land areas that were under developed or vacant using current aerial mapping. No land ownership records were sourced, nor were any specific parcels identified at this stage of the plan development. Identification of specific land parcel(s) leading to future options or land procurement is not included in this scope and would be completed by the City once a preferred wastewater management plan is established. Following the desktop screening, a physical street by street survey was undertaken to confirm likely candidate sites. From this field survey, the following three potential new plant sites were identified: North Site A new potential treatment plant site has been identified in the northwest quadrant of the City between the CC International Airport and the I-37 highway. This is a suitable area for a number of reasons: • This site can readily be reached by future transfer of flows from Allison, Greenwood and Broadway service areas. • A discharge to the Ship Channel is the most practical outlet for the wastewater effluent; however, an effluent discharge to Oso Creek and Nueces River and delta would also be feasible from this site. Treated reuse water could be provided from this location to neighboring industries. • There are large open areas available generally between Agnes St (Rte 44) and Leopard St. For costing of conveyance options, a future plant site has been assumed to be located along Sedwick Rd. • The existing land use in this area is mostly agricultural or industrial which is generally compatible with wastewater operations. Southwest Site A new potential treatment plant site has been identified in the southwest quadrant of the City south of Oso Creek in the vicinity of the Crosstown Expressway (Hwy 286) which is currently being extended southward by TxDOT. This is a suitable area for a number of reasons: • This site can readily be accessed by future transfer of flows from Greenwood service area and the significant future development expected south of Oso Creek. • A discharge to Oso Creek is the most practical outlet for the wastewater effluent. • The existing land use in this area is mixed, with some institutional uses, some residential and the remainder currently agricultural. • There are large open areas available and, for costing of conveyance options, a future plant site has been assumed to be located along Hwy 286 midway between Weber Rd and South Staples Rd. Southeast Site A new potential treatment plant site has been identified in the southeast quadrant of the City in the vicinity of Yorktown Blvd. to the north of Oso Creek. This is a suitable area for a number of reasons: • This site can readily be accessed by future transfer of flows from the Greenwood, Oso and Laguna Madre service areas as well as the significant future development expected south of Oso Creek. • A discharge to Oso Creek at the head of Oso Bay is the most practical outlet for the wastewater effluent. • There is currently vacant land available, including a City owned parcel at Starry Lane south of Yorktown Blvd. For costing of conveyance options, a future plant site has been assumed to be located along Starry Lane. These three sites, together with various combinations of the existing treatment plant sites were considered in developing the potential future wastewater servicing options discussed in the next section. 1.5.3 General Wastewater Servicing Options Using the existing constraints as a guide, 10 wastewater servicing options were developed to address the following City priorities: 1. Meeting regulatory compliance 2. Minimize wastewater user rates 3. Reduce longterm Operating and Maintenance (O&M) and capital costs 4. Provide for future drought resistant water to industry 5. Meet future needs for planned development 35 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 nein G kaiak Trsciilerjse LNV ® Stantec The servicing options were primarily aimed at establishing the best location, or combination of locations, for the future wastewater treatment plants. Collection system impacts within each of the service areas were not a primary determining factor since these would be required regardless of the consolidation options being considered. The Broadway WWTP and Whitecap WWTP were considered to stay in operation for the foreseeable future for all of the options considered. However, servicing options that facilitate future consolidation of both Broadway and Whitecap were viewed more favorably in the options evaluation. The city has recently completed construction of the Broadway WWTP. This new facility, once optimized, should provide cost effective treatment over the next 20 plus years. At this point we are assuming the City will continue to operate the Broadway facility for at least the next 20 years while they focus on other more pressing issues associated with the existing wastewater treatment plants. The costs to consolidate the Whitecap WWTP is estimated at approximately $30 M. This cost includes a pumping station and pipeline to the Laguna Madre WWTP where it is assumed there would be a new plant to accept the flow or a pumping station to pump the Whitecap flow on to an upgraded and expanded Oso WRP. The estimated capital cost to pump the Whitecap flows to a new Southeast facility are also in the vicinity of $30 M. The maximum potential O&M saving associated with consolidating Whitecap flow at a larger regional facility would be approximately $500,000 per year. The minimum estimated simple payback period to recoup the consolidation costs would therefore be greater than 50 years. The city should reassess the feasibility of consolidation should conditions change. Category 1- Maintain all Existing sites 2 - Consolidate at Existing Plant sites 3 - Consolidate at New Plant site Table 1-27 Wastewater Servicing Options Description • Keep six sites. Replace Greenwood on same site. Continue with current operations and planned maintenance. • Keep Broadway & Whitecap. • Consolidate remainder at two of the existing plant sites. • Keep Broadway & Whitecap. • Consolidate remainder at one new plant site. Options • 1- Maintain Existing Sites • 2A - Allison + Laguna Madre • 2B - Allison + Oso • 3A - North site • 3B - Southwest site • 3C - Southeast site 4- Combination of New and Existing • Keep Broadway & Whitecap. • Consolidate remainder at two sites with at least one new site plus an existing site. • 4A - North + Laguna Madre • 4B - Southwest + Laguna Madre • 4C - North + Southeast • 4D - North + Oso For each of the wastewater servicing options, required project elements were identified to enable meeting the primary servicing goals. The diagram of the major elements for each identified option plus the necessary capital project elements are summarized as follows. Path C R kailo "` TischlerBise G November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 36 Stantec LNV 1.5.3.1 Option 1 - Maintain All Existing Sites Option 1 involves expansion and repair of the six (6) existing wastewater treatment facilities. The system configuration under Option 1 is presented here as Figure 1-9. Figure 1-9 Option 1 System Configuration Laguna Madre Legend iiExpand Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant —> Reuse Pipeline 2.5 5 14 37 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 C R kali©'` Tischl reBEse• LNV ® Stantec The wastewater generation potential for planned developments south of Oso Creek is expected to be approximately 20 MGD. Therefore, we would anticipate that under Option 1 a seventh wastewater treatment plant may need to be constructed in future. Two options were evaluated for the Greenwood WWTP including upgrading, flood proofing, and expanding the existing plant. The recommended option is construction of a new 10 MGD `flood proof' WWTP on the existing plant site. The key infrastructure requirements under option 1 over the next 30 -years are presented here as Table 1-28. Option 1 (maintain all existing sites) was the benchmark against which all other options have been evaluated. Table 1-28 Summary of Infrastructure Requirements for Option 1 Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Repair over next 20 years • Upgrade to BNR in 10 years • Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Build new 10 MGD `flood proof' facility • Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years Oso • Repair plant over next 20 years • Upgrade plant to BNR in next 5 years • Expand plant to 20 MGD in next 8 to 10 years. Laguna Madre • Repair over next 20 years Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years The new 10 MGD Greenwood WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-29. Table 1-29 Proposed Unit Operations for New 10 MGD Greenwood WWTP Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 2 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 2 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 3 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 3 BNRbioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 3 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 3 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 2 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 3 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation 1.5.3.2 Option 2A - Consolidation at Allison and Laguna Madre Option 2A involves the consolidation of existing plant flows at the Allison and Laguna Madre WWTP sites. Oso and Greenwood would be taken out of service under this alternative and Broadway and Whitecap would stay in service for the foreseeable future although they could be consolidated at a later time. The system configuration under Option 2A is presented here as Figure 1-10. Path C R kali() " TischlerSise G November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 38 Stantec LNV Figure 1-10 Option 2A System Configuration i N Legend Sit Close Treatment Plant * Repair Treatment Plant 10 Expand Treatment Plant 4. Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline Laguna Madre The key infrastructure requirements under Option 2A over the next 30 -years are presented here as Table 1-30. Table 1-30 Summary of Infrastructure Requirements under Option 2A Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Construct a new 12 MGD facility at the Allison site in the next 5 years. • Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to Allison. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years Oso • Repair plant over next 10 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 10 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Oso plant to transfer wastewater from Oso to the new Laguna Madre facility. Laguna Madre • Repair the existing plant over the next 10 years • Build a new 20 MGD plant at the Laguna Madre site to take flows from Laguna Madre and Oso. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years 39 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Barri C R kali©'` Tischl reBEse• LNV Stantec The new 12 MGD Allison WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-31. Table 1-31 Proposed Unit Operations for New 12 MGD Allison WWTP Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 2 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 2 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 3 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 3 BNRbioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 3 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 3 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 2 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 3 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation The new 20 MGD Laguna Madre WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-32. Table 1-32 Proposed Unit Operations for new 20 MGD Laguna Madre WWTP Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 4 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 4 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 4 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 4 BNRbioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 4 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 4 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 4 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 4 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation Path C R G kaiok use November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 40 Stantec LNV 1.5.3.3 Option 2B - Consolidation at Allison and Oso Option 2B involves the consolidation of existing plant flows at the Allison and Oso sites. Laguna Madre and Greenwood would be taken out of service under this alternative and Broadway and Whitecap would stay in service for the foreseeable future although they could be consolidated at a later time. The system configuration under Option 2B over the next 30 years is presented here as Figure 1-11. Figure 1-11 Option 2B System Configuration IT Legend Close Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant Expand Treatment Plant Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline 2.6 The key infrastructure requirements under the Option 2B are presented here as Table 1-33. Table 1-33 Summary of Infrastructure Requirements under Option 2B Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Construct a new 12 MGD facility at the Allison site in the next 5 years. • Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to Allison. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years Oso • Repair plant over next 20 years • Expand plant capacity to 20 MGD and upgrade to BNR. Laguna Madre • Repair the existing plant over the next 10 years • Build a new pumping station at the Laguna Madre site and transfer wastewater from Laguna Madre to the Oso site. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years 41 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 C x kali©' Tischl reuse" LNV ® Stantec 1.5.3.4 Option 3A - Consolidate at a new North Plant Site Option 3A involves the consolidation of existing plant flows at a new North treatment plant site. Allison, Oso, Laguna Madre and Greenwood would be taken out of service under this alternative and Broadway and Whitecap would stay in service for the foreseeable future although they could be consolidated at a later time. The system configuration under Option 3A is presented here as Figure 1-12. f3 Figure 1-12 Option 3A System Configuration Minton roadway Corpus furan Bey Oso Legend New Treatment Plant Close Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant Wastewater Pipeline -• Reuse Pipeline Laguna Madre 0 2.6 S 4a 60u <7„/ /7:///4 The key infrastructure requirements under the Option 3A over the next 30 years are presented here as Table 1-34. nate C x kail©'' Tischl re Bose November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 42 Stantec LNV Table 1-34 Summary of Infrastructure Requirements under Option 3A Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Repair over next 15 years • Decommission the plant after 15 -years and build new pumping station to direct flows to the new North treatment plant. Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to the new North treatment plant site. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years North Treatment Plant • Build new 32 MGD North WWTP in the 0 to 5 year time period. Oso • Repair plant over next 10 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 0 to 10 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Oso plant to transfer wastewater from Oso to the new North treatment plant. Laguna Madre • Repair over next 20 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 0 to 20 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Laguna Madre plant to transfer wastewater from Laguna Madre to the new North treatment plant. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years The new 32 MGD North Site WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-35. Table 1-35 Proposed Unit Operations for New 32 MGD North Site WWTP Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 6 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 6 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 6 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 6 BNR bioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 6 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 6 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 6 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 6 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation 43 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse LNV ® Stantec 1.5.3.5 Option 3B - Consolidate at a new Southwest Plant Site Option 3B involves the consolidation of existing plant flows at a single Southwest WWTP site. Allison, Oso, Laguna Madre and Greenwood would be taken out of service under this alternative and Broadway and Whitecap would stay in service for the foreseeable future although they could be consolidated at a later time. The system configuration under Option 3B is presented here as Figure 1-13. Figure 1-13 Option 3B System Configuration Legend New Treatment Plant Close Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant —> Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline z.s Laguna Madre 1ft 14114 The key infrastructure requirements under the Option 3B over the next 30 years are presented here as Table 1-36. Path C R G kaiok Tisch &use November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 44 Stantec LNV Table 1-36 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 3B Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Repair over next 15 years • Decommission the plant after 15 -years and build new pumping station to direct flows to the new Southwest treatment plant. Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to the new Southwest treatment plant site. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years New Southwest Treatment Plant • Build new 35 MGD Southwest Treatment plant in the 0 to 5 year period. Oso • Repair plant over next 10 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 0 to 10 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Oso plant to transfer wastewater from Oso to the new Southwest treatment plant. Laguna Madre • Repair over next 20 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 20 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Laguna Madre plant to transfer wastewater from Laguna Madre to the new Southwest treatment plant. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years The new 35 MGD Southwest WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-37. Table 1-37 Proposed Unit Operations for New 35 MGD Southwest WWTP Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 6 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 6 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 6 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 6 BNR bioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 6 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 6 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 6 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 6 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation 45 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse LNV ® Stantec 1.5.3.6 Option 3C - Consolidate at a new Southeast Plant Site Option 3C involves the consolidation of existing plant flows at a single Southeast WWTP site. Allison, Oso, Laguna Madre and Greenwood would be taken out of service under this alternative and Broadway and Whitecap would stay in service for the foreseeable future although they could be consolidated at a later time. The system configuration under Option 3C is presented here as Figure 1-14. Figure 1-14 Option 3C System Configuration Legend ) New Treatment Plant atClose Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant Wastewater Pipeline 2.s s ,n : Mies Laguna Madre The key infrastructure requirements under the Option 3C over the next 30 years are presented here as Table 1-38. nate C x kail©' Tischl re Bose November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 46 Stantec LNV Table 1-38 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 3C Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Repair over next 15 years • Close after 15 -years and build new pumping station to direct flows to the new Southeast treatment plant. Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to the new Southeast treatment plant site. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years New Southeast Treatment Plant • Build new 32 MGD Southeast Treatment plant in the 0 to 5 year period. Oso • Repair plant over next 10 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 10 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Oso plant to transfer wastewater from Oso to the new Southeast treatment plant. Laguna Madre • Repair over next 20 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 0 to 20 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Laguna Madre plant to transfer wastewater from Laguna Madre to the new Southeast treatment plant. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years The new 32 MGD Southeast WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-39. Table 1-39 Proposed Unit Operations for new 32 MGD Southeast Treatment Plant Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 6 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 6 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 6 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 6 BNR bioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 6 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 6 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 6 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 6 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation 1.5.3.7 Option 4A - Consolidate at a new North Plant Site and Laguna Madre Option 4A involves the consolidation of existing plant flows at two treatment plant sites: a new north plant site and a new plant adjacent the Laguna Madre site. Allison, Oso, Laguna Madre and Greenwood would be taken out of service under this alternative and Broadway and Whitecap would stay in service for the foreseeable future although they could be consolidated at a later time. The system configuration under Option 4A is presented here as Figure 1-15. 47 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse LNV Stantec Figure 1-15 Option 4A System Configuration N Legend f New Treatment Plant Close Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant Esn Expand Treatment Plant Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline zs S tib Riles The key infrastructure requirements under the Option 4A over the next 30 years are presented here as Table 1-40. Table 1-40 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 4A Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Repair over next 15 years • Decommission the plant after 15 -years and build new pumping station to direct flows to the new North treatment plant. North Treatment Plant • Construct a new 12 MGD facility at the North treatment plant site in the next 5 years. • Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to the new North treatment plant site. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years Oso • Repair plant over next 5 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Oso plant to transfer wastewater from Oso to the new Laguna Madre facility. Laguna Madre • Repair the existing plant over the next 5 years • Build a new 20 MGD plant at the Laguna Madre site to take flows from Laguna Madre and Oso. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years nate C x kail©'' Tischl re Bose November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 48 Stantec LNV The new 12 MGD North WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-41. Table 1-41 Proposed Unit Operations for new North WWTP under Option 4A Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 2 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 2 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 3 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 3 BNRbioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 3 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 3 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 2 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 3 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation The new 20 MGD Laguna Madre WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-42. Table 1-42 Proposed Unit Operations for New Laguna Madre WWTP under Option 4A Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 4 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 4 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 4 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 4 BNRbioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 4 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 4 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 4 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 4 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation 1.5.3.8 Option 4B - Consolidate at a new Southwest Site and Laguna Madre Option 4B involves the consolidation of existing plant flows at two treatment plant sites: a new southwest plant site and a new plant adjacent the Laguna Madre site. Allison, Oso, Laguna Madre and Greenwood would be taken out of service under this alternative and Broadway and Whitecap would stay in service for the foreseeable future although they could be consolidated at a later time. The system configuration under Option 4B is presented here as Figure 1-16. 49 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rp Fri CR kailo'` TischlerBlse LNV Stantec Figure 1-16 Option 4B System Configuration N Legend f New Treatment Plant Close Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant Esn Expand Treatment Plant Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline zs S tib Riles The key infrastructure requirements under the Option 4B over the next 30 years are presented here as Table 1-43. Table 1-43 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 4B Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Repair over next 15 years • Decommission plant after 15 -years and build new pumping station to direct flows to the new Southwest treatment plant. Southwest Treatment Plant • Construct a new 12 MGD facility at the Southwest treatment plant site in the next 5 years. • Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to the new Southwest treatment plant site. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years Oso • Repair plant over next 5 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 0 to 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Oso plant to transfer wastewater from Oso to the new Laguna Madre facility. Laguna Madre • Repair the existing plant over the next 5 years • Build a new 20 MGD plant at the Laguna Madre site to take flows from Laguna Madre and Oso. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years nate C R r c kail©'' Tischl re Bose November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 50 Stantec LNV The new 12 MGD Southwest WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-44. Table 1-44 Proposed Unit Operations for Proposed Southwest Treatment Plant under Option 4B Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 2 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 2 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 3 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 3 BNRbioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 3 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 3 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 2 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 3 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation The new 20 MGD Laguna Madre WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-45. Table 1-45 Proposed Unit Operations for Laguna Madre WWTP under Option 4B Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 4 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 4 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 4 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 4 BNRbioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 4 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 4 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 4 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 4 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation 1.5.3.9 Option 4C - Consolidate at a new North Plant Site and a New Southeast Plant Site Option 4C involves the consolidation of existing plant flows at two treatment plant sites: a new southeast plant site and a new north plant site. Allison, Oso, Laguna Madre and Greenwood would be taken out of service under this alternative and Broadway and Whitecap would stay in service for the foreseeable future although they could be consolidated at a later time. The system configuration under Option 4C is presented here as Figure 1-17. 51 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse LNV Stantec Figure 1-17 Option 4C System Configuration N Legend New Treatment Plant Close Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant ► Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline z.s The key infrastructure requirements under the Option 4C over the next 30 years are presented here as Table 1-46. Table 1-46 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 4C Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Repair over next 15 years • Decommission the plant after 15 -years and build new pumping station to direct flows to the new North treatment plant. North Treatment Plant • Construct a new 12 MGD facility at the North treatment plant site in the next 5 years. • Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 0 to 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to the new North treatment plant site. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years Oso • Repair plant over next 5 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 0 to 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Oso plant to transfer wastewater from Oso to the new Southeast treatment plant facility. New Southeast Plant • Build a new 20 MGD plant at the Southeast site to take flows from Oso and ultimately Laguna Madre. nate C x hail©'' Tischl re Bose November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 52 Stantec LNV Plant Infrastructure Requirements Laguna Madre • Repair the existing plant over the next 20 years • Transfer flow to Southeast plant after 20 years. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years The new 12 MGD North WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-47. Table 1-47 Proposed Unit Operations for New 12 MGD North Plant under Option 4C Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 2 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 2 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 3 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 3 BNRbioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 3 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 3 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 2 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 3 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation The new 20 MGD Southeast WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-48. Table 1-48 Proposed Unit Operations for New 20 MGD Southeast Plant Under Option 4C Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 4 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 4 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 4 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 4 BNRbioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 4 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 4 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 4 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 4 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation 1.5.3.10 Option 4D - Consolidate at a new North Plant Site and the Existing Oso WRP Site Option 4D involves the consolidation of existing plant flows at two treatment plant sites: a new north plant site and an expanded and upgraded plant on the Oso WRP site. Allison, Oso, Laguna Madre and Greenwood would be taken out of service under this alternative and Broadway and Whitecap would stay in service for the foreseeable future although they could be consolidated at a later time. The system configuration under Option 4D is presented here as Figure 1-18. 53 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerNse LNV Stantec Figure 1-18 Option 4D System Configuration Legend (, New Treatment Plant StClose Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant EDI Expand Treatment Plant Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline 2.s MAN The key infrastructure requirements under the Option 4D over the next 30 years are presented here as Table 1-49. Table 1-49 Summary of Key Infrastructure Requirements under Option 4D Piurir Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Repair over next 10 years • Decommission the plant after 10 -years and build new pumping station to direct flows to the new North treatment plant. North Treatment Plant • Construct a new 12 MGD facility at the North treatment plant site in the next 5 years. • Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to the new North treatment plant site. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years Oso • Repair plant over next 20 years • Upgrade plant to BNR and expand to 20 MGD over next 5 years. Laguna Madre • Repair the existing plant over the next 5 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 0 to 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Laguna Madre plant to transfer wastewater from Laguna Madre to the Oso treatment plant. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years nate• C x hail©'' Tischl re Bose bi G —. November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 54 Stantec LNV The new 12 MGD North WWTP would include the unit processes summarized in Table 1-50. Table 1-50 Proposed Unit Operations for 12 MGD New Plant under Option 4D Unit Process Preliminary Assumption Preliminary Treatment • 2 mechanically cleaned screens with grinders/washers/compactors • 2 mechanical vortex grit removal systems Primary Clarifiers • 3 primary clarifiers Secondary Treatment • 3 BNRbioreactors (4 stage Bardenpho) • 3 Secondary clarifiers Disinfection • UV disinfection Sludge Thickening • 3 Rotary Drum thickeners Digestion • 2 Anaerobic Digesters Sludge Dewatering • 3 centrifuge units Miscellaneous • Headworks odor control (chemical) • Primary odor control • Cogeneration for energy recovery from biogas • Automation and instrumentation 1.5.4 Capital and O&M Cost Analyses 1.5.4.1 Introduction One of the primary reasons for conducting this study was to confirm the potential benefits of consolidating flows from the six existing wastewater treatment facilities into a lesser number of newer larger treatment plants. The unit operating costs for larger wastewater treatment plants tend to be lower than for smaller facilities. This is primarily due to the facts staffing levels, measured as full- time equivalents (FTEs) per million gallon (MG) treated, and unit power costs measured as kilowatt hours (kW -hr) per million gallon treated decline with increasing plant capacity. The decline in unit power costs tends to level off at a design flow of approximately 20 MGD. As indicated in Section 1.1.2, the city is facing an estimated sustaining capital spend at the six existing wastewater treatment facilities of approximately $220 M. The majority of the capital requirements are for the Greenwood (approximately $61 M) and Oso (approximately $81 M) facilities. The contributing sewer shed for these two plants is coincidentally where the majority of anticipated demand growth is expected to occur. The currently planned capital improvement plan for which current rates are based (estimated capital spend to 2035 of approximately $524 M) is already considered unaffordable based upon EPA affordability criteria. User rate increases are driven in large part by increases in capital spend. The increase in capital spending can be partly offset by reductions in annual O&M spend. Options requiring a large upfront capital spend over the next 5 to 10 -years will have a significant further negative impact upon wastewater user rates if not offset by O&M cost efficiencies. The implementation of any of the options presented in the previous section needs to strike the appropriate balance between minimizing the sustaining capital spend on existing facilities destined to be taken out of service, consolidating existing facilities as soon as possible in order to realize annual O&M savings associated with economies of scale sooner rather than later, while staging planned capital spending for new facilities in order to minimize the impact upon user rates. The best way to assess the options under consideration was to construct a detailed cash flow model for each. The consulting team constructed detailed capital and O&M cost models for each of the options presented in Section 1.5.3. All of the options were compared against Option 1- Maintain existing six plants which was treated as the benchmark. The team then conducted sensitivity analyses on each of the options considered to determine how changing conditions might impact costs as well as the recommended servicing option. 1.5.4.2 Capital and O&M Cost Assumptions The capital and O&M cost estimates for each of the 10 options considered are presented in Appendix F. Three spreadsheet models were constructed for these analyses: a wastewater treatment plant staffing model, an estimate of power usage at each plant, and the overall cash flow model summarizing estimated capital and O&M costs. 55 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse The following assumptions were used in developing the cost models: • All of the optimization measures identified to reduce existing O&M costs in the Operations assessment were assumed to be applied to all options including Option 1- Maintain Six Existing Treatment Plants. • All works identified in the physical condition survey were carried out for all plants until such time as they were identified as being taken out of service. For example, a number of options assumed Greenwood will be taken out of service in year 5 therefore all works identified in the physical condition survey for Greenwood in the 0 to 5 -year period were included in the cash flow analysis. • Staffing level estimates were based upon the assessment methodology outlined in the "Northeast Guide for Estimating Staffing at Publicly and Privately Owned Wastewater Treatment Plants" dated November 2008 prepared by the New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission. • Preliminary power usage estimates for all treatment plant facilities were based upon guidance provided in the publication entitled "Electricity Use and Management in the Municipal Water Supply and Wastewater Industries" dated November 2013 and published by Water Research Foundation and Electrical Power Research Institute. • Non -process electrical loads will be approximately one third of those referenced in the above -noted guidance to account for the warmer climate in Texas. • Chemical costs under optimal conditions were taken as equal the average amount as indicated in the NACWA study. • Hauling costs were based upon an average solids generation of 0.59 dry tons/MG treated and a unit cost of $57.16/wet ton (2016) inflated at 2% per year. • The existing plants were assumed to maintain their current sludge dewatering performance with new plants assumed to achieve a minimum of 24% solids. • Preventative maintenance costs were estimated at 1.5 % per year of the replacement cost of the process mechanical and electrical equipment. Process mechanical and electrical equipment was assumed to account for 35% of the overall capital cost for all vertical works. • Approximately 20% of the aeration requirements required for nitrification will be recovered via denitrification when biological nutrient removal (BNR) is installed at any plant. • The current practice of disposing of sludge at a co - disposal landfill will continue into the foreseeable future. Rath C R G kaiok use LNV Stantec • Existing effluent limits at the Broadway and Whitecap plants will stay into effect for the foreseeable future and will not change over the 30 -year planning horizon. • All new and expanded plants will need to be converted to BNR. • All new plants will convert to anaerobic digestion with energy recovery. • The capital and O&M costs associated with industrial reuse will be paid for through a take or pay contract with interested industries and are not included in the cash flow and therefore the user rates. • Current electricity prices are $0.088/kW-hr and 2018 through 2022 prices will be $0.03883/kW-hr with 1% energy price inflation after 2021. • Average burdened labor cost is $68,448/year per FTE. Future wage inflation was assumed as 2% per year. • The cost of chemicals was $99/MG treated unless otherwise noted based upon actual plant operating records. Future chemical costs were assumed to increase by 1.5% per year. • Inflation on sludge haulage and preventative maintenance were both assumed as 2% per year. • Operating and maintenance costs other than labor, energy, chemicals, sludge hauling, and preventative maintenance were assumed to account for 25% to 30% of the overall total cost. 1.5.4.3 Capital and O&M Cost Analyses Capital and O&M cost estimates were completed for each of the 10 options previously presented. The cost models are enclosed in Appendix F and summarized here in Table 1-51. November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 56 Stantec LNV Table 1-51 Summary of Capital and O&M Costs by Option Option Description Capital Cost (2016-2045) (2016 Constant Dollars) Capital Cost Industrial Reuse (2016 Constant Dollars) Inflated O&M Costs (2016 to 2045) 1 Maintain six existing plants $734 M $108 M $521 M 2A Consolidate at Allison and Laguna Madre $950 M $50 M $502 M 2B Consolidate at Allison and Oso $836 M $50 M $467 M 3A Consolidate ata new North Plant $1,053 M $48 M $504 M 3B Consolidate at a new Southwest Plant $1,047 M $63 M $505 M 3C Consolidate at a new Southeast Plant $1,012 M TBD $516 M 4A Consolidate at a new North Plant and Laguna Madre $944 M $48 M $484 M 4B Consolidate at a new Southwest Plant and Laguna Madre $1,021 M $48 M $494 M 4C Consolidate at a new North Plant and a new Southeast Plant $958 M $63 M $493 M 4D Consolidate at a 0 o North Plant and $826 M $48 M $466 M 1.5.4.4 Sensitivity Analyses The project team conducted a sensitivity analysis of the various options considering the impact of changes in both energy and labor costs. The relative impact of various inflation rates on difference in O&M costs between the options is summarized here in Tables 2-52 and 2-53. Table 1-52 Difference in O&M Cost between Servicing Options for Various Labor Inflation Rates Option 1 Description O&M Costs O&M Costs (2% Labor Inflation) Diff. Relative to Optionl (4% Labor Inflation) Diff. Relative to Optionl Maintain six existing plants $521 M - $622 M - 2A Consolidate at Allison and Laguna Madre $502 M $19 M $575 M $47 M 2B Consolidate at Allison and Oso $467 M $54 M $529 M $93 M 3A Consolidate ata new North Plant $504 M $18 M $562 M $60 M 3B Consolidate ata new Southwest Plant $505 M $17 M $580 M $42 M 3C Consolidate ata new Southeast Plant $516 M $5 M $585 M $37 M 4A Consolidate ata new North Plant and Laguna Madre $484 M $37 M $548 M $73 M 4B Consolidate at a new Southwest Plant and Laguna Madre $494 M $27 M $570 M $53 M 4C Consolidate at a new North Plant and a new Southeast Plant $493 M $28 M $562 M $61 M 4D Consolidate at a new North Plant and Oso $466 M $55 M $529 M $93 M 57 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse LNV Stantec Table 1-53 Difference in O&M Costs between Options for Various Power Inflation Rates Option 1 Description O&M Costs O&M Costs (1% Electricity Inflation) Diff. Relative to Optionl (5% Electricity Inflation) Diff. Relative to Optionl Maintain six existing plants $521 M - $546 M - 2A Consolidate at Allison and Laguna Madre $502 M $19 M $528 M $18 M 2B Consolidate at Allison and Oso $467 M $54 M $492 M $54 M 3A Consolidate at a new North Plant $504 M $18 M $541 M $15 M 3B Consolidate ata new Southwest Plant $505 M $17 M $542 M $14 M 3C Consolidate at a new Southeast Plant $516 M $5 M $543 M $3 M 4A Consolidate ata new North Plant and Laguna Madre $484 M $37 M $509 M $36 M 4B Consolidate at a new Southwest Plant and Laguna Madre $494 M $27 M $520 M $26 M 4C Consolidate at a new North Plant and a new Southeast Plant $493 M $28 M $519 M $27 M 4D Consolidate at a new North Plant and Oso $466 M $55 M $491 M $55 M 1.5.4.5 Rate Impacts The consulting team estimated the impact of a number of the proposed servicing options on future wastewater rates using the city's existing rate model. The existing rate model calculates rates out to 2035. The estimated increase in user rates for options 1, 2B, 4D, and 3A are presented here in Table 1-54. In comparison, it is noted that the historical wastewater user rate increased by approximately 110% between 2005 and 2015. Option Table 1-54 Supplemental Wastewater User Rate Calculations Description Relative Increase in Wastewater User Rates (2016 to 2035) 1 2B 3A 4D Maintain six existing plants Consolidate at Allison and Oso Consolidate at a new North Plant Consolidate at a new North Plant and Oso 81% 85% 99% 84% 1.5.4.6 Cost Analysis Conclusions and Recommendations The financial analysis suggests Option 1- Maintain the six existing plants has the lowest overall capital cost associated with treatment and pumping infrastructure given that it takes maximum advantage of existing infrastructure. Option 1 however has the highest capital cost for industrial reuse water given reuse water would likely have to be provided from two treatment plants as opposed to one under other options. Option 1 also has the highest O&M costs ofthe options considered. The cost analyses suggest Options 2B and 4D are competitive with Option lfrom an overall cost perspective considering capital costs for treatment and reuse as well as cumulative O&M costs. The relative impact on user rates for options 1, 2B, and 4D is essentially equal. Option 3A would have a statistically significant impact on user rates relative to the Option 1 benchmark. Sensitivity analysis demonstrates that the difference in O&M cost savings is most sensitive to labor costs and labor cost inflation. The consolidation options each result in significant staff reduction relative to the bench mark Option 1 even after optimizing existing plant operations. Higher future labor costs and increased labor inflation will favor the consolidation options, particularly options 2B and 4D, relative to the benchmark (Option 1). The difference in 2045 staffing levels between the group 3 options (3A, 3B, and 3C) is only 4 or 5 staff relative to the group 2 and 4 options. The group 2 and 4 consolidation options are less affected by energy cost inflation and release O&M cost savings sooner than the group 3 options at much lower capital cost. Path C R kailo " TischlerSise G November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 58 Stantec `NV 1.5.5 Prescreening Criteria and Options Prescreening Prior to evaluating the Options, the City staff and their consultant teams engaged with the citizens and other stakeholders to hear what issues and concerns needed to be considered in selecting the optimum future wastewater configuration. As can be expected, there was a wide range of opinions expressed by the general public, neighborhood associations, agencies, business professionals and other interested parties. These issues of concerns were then grouped into preliminary evaluation criteria to cover the Economic, Social, Natural and Technical environments. The preliminary criteria were presented to City staff at an evaluation workshop where the team could confirm that these fully covered the range of relevant issues and also establish the relative priorities. Three priority levels and associated weightings were proposed: normal items were unweighted (level 1), important items were given a double weighting (level 2) and the most critical items were given a triple weighting (level 3). The final evaluation criteria and selected weightings are shown in Table 1-55. Table 1-55 Evaluation Criteria and Weighting Factors used for Options Evaluation Category Sub -Topic Considerations for Evaluation Weighting Total Capital Cost Overall 30 year capital cost 3 Cost Total O&M Cost Overall 30 year operating and maintenance costs Maximum peak annual capital and O&M costs 2 3 Cash Flow Maintaining base flow Providing minimum low flow conditions for streams 1 Receiving Streams Effluent requirements Ability to meet the expected future treatment requirements Support locally established eco systems 3 2 Local eco systems Phasing potential Opportunity for staging work to meet flow projections 2 Schedule Immediate start to work Early access to complete critical R&R needs at facilities 1 Neighboring land use Is the land use compatible with new/expanded facility 2 Land ownership Is new land acquisition required 1 Plant Sites Existing impacts Does this reduce existing odor, noise or traffic issues 1 Flooding potential Is the site vulnerable to flooding 2 Construction Restoration requirements Length of new pipeline under established road ways 1 Impacts Traffic disruption Duration of pipeline construction under major roadways Ease of providing reuse water for industry and other users 2 1 Potential for Reuse Operational Flexibility Servicing new Development Ease of providing servicing of future developments 1 Efficiency of O&M Efficiency provided by centralized operations and maintenance 2 Flexibility for future consolidation Ability to consolidate with remaining plants in future 2 Having established the evaluation criteria, each of the 10 Wastewater Servicing Options was evaluated using a qualitative five -point scale that ranged from strongly negative to strongly positive with a neutral midpoint level. It should be emphasized that the evaluation is subjective in nature and seeks to determine the relative performance or predicted impact under each criteria of an option as compared to the performance or impact of the other servicing options. To reinforce that the evaluation is qualitative in nature, symbols rather than numbers were used to represent the "score" under each criteria. The evaluation of options is presented here in Figure 1-19. Based on this evaluation, the highest ranked wastewater servicing options (in order of preference) are: • Option 4D - Consolidate at new North Plant & Oso • Option 2B - Consolidate at Allison and Oso • Option 1- Upgrade at the Existing Sites 59 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse LNV ® Stantec Figure 1-19 Options Evaluation Matrix LNV ® Stantec a) U Sub -Topic 1 !• __". " 2A 4_ f 2B 3A e 3B 3C __ 4A ,—. 4B __— 4C _ — 4D _ Total Capital Cost Strongly positive capital cost less than$800M Neutral - mid levelcapital cost of$900Mto $1,000M Positive -capital cost less than $900M Negative -capital costmorethan $1,000M Negative -capital costmorethan $1,000M Negative -capital costmorethan $1,000M Neutral -mid level capital cost $1,000M to $1,000M Neutral -mid levelcapital cost $1,000M $1,000M Neutral -mid level capital cost C $1,000M 00Mto Positive -capital 46 costlessthan $900M l_Jmorethan$550M Total O&M Cost Negative -high level O&M cost Neutral- mid o levelO&M cost of $525M to $550M Strongly positive- • low O&M cost less than$500M Neutral- mid 4) levelO&M cost of $525M to $550M Neutral -mid 1) level O&M cost of $525M to $550M Neutral- mid 4) levelO&M cost of $525M to $550M Positive -lower 4) O&M cost of $500M to $525M Neutral- mid 4) levelO&M cost of $525M to $550M Neutral -mid 4) level O&M cost of $525M to $550M Strongly positive - • low O&M cost less than$500M Cash Flow Strongly positive- • max annual spend of approx $100M Neutral -max O annual spend of approx$200M Neutral -max O annual spend of approx$200M Negative -max O annual spend of approx$250M Negative -max O annual spend of approx$250M Negative -max O annual spend of approx$250M Negative -max O annual spend of approx$250M Strongly negative 0-maxannual $300M rox Strongly negative 0-maxannuat $300M rox Neutral -max O annual spend of approx$200M Maintaining base flow Neutral -keeps O all at status quo Negative -reduce O flows to Oso Bay Neutral -keeps O criticalflows at status quo Negative -reduce O flows to Oso Bay Strongly negative -reduce flow to O Oso Bay, increase to Oso Creek Negative -reduce O flows to Oso Bay Negative -reduce O flows to Oso Bay Strongly negative reduce flows to O Oso Bay, increase to Oso Creek Negative -reduce O flows to Oso Bay Neutral -keeps O criticalflows at status quo Effluent requirements Negative- continues challenges in Oso Bay and Nueces River Neutral- continues challenges in NuecesRiver Negative- continues t) challenges in Oso Bay and Nueces giver Positive -allows G lower treatment requirements Neutral- continues challenges in Oso Creek Neutral- continues 41) challenges in Oso Creek Positive -allows lower treatment requirements Neutral- continues challenges in Oso Creek Positive -allows lower treatment requirements Neutral -lower treatment in north, challenges inOso Bay Localeco systems O Neutral -keeps status quo Negative- O potentialimpact at Blind Oso from loss of flow O Neutral -keeps status quo Negative- O potentialimpact at Blind Oso from loss of flow Negative- O potentialimpact at Blind Osofrom loss of flow Negative- O potentialimpact at Blind Oso from loss of flow Negative- O potentialimpact at Blind Osofrom loss of flow Negative- O potentialimpact at Blind Oso from loss of flow Negative- O potentialimpact at Blind Osofrom loss of flow O Neutral -keeps status quo Phasing potential li Positive -can Ann proceed with multiple projects at onetime Neutral- can proceed at two sites and with pipelines Neutral- can � proceed at two sites and with pipelines Negative - requires all projects robe ©tl' ompleted at same time Negative - requires all projects to be completed at sametime Negative - requires all projects robe completed at sametime Neutral- can � proceed at two sites and with pipelines Neutral- can proceed at two sites and with pipelines Neutral- can � proceed at two sites and with pipelines Neutral- can proceed at two sites and with pipelines Immediate start to work Neutral- iv challenges at Oso, remainder available Positive - can work adjacent toboth existing plants Neutral- iv challenges at Oso, remainder available Negative AV -requires acquisition of land Negative AV -requires acquisition of land Positive - can work independently on new plant Negative AV -requires acquisition of land Negative AV -requires acquisition of land Negative AV -requires acquisition of land Negative -requires acquisition of land and working at Oso u c kaio ^ Tschler lis, Legend 0 0 c • Strongly Negative Positive strongly Negative Neutral November 2016 Opt., Wostewater ireolmentConfigurotion 60 ® Stantec Stantec `NV/ o)"- U Sub -Topic 1 ,p- z-_—_, Neutral- continues O residential conflicts at Oso and Greenwood 2A Positive - uses dp sites with good buffers 2B _ Neutral- ontiContinues O rcesidentialnues conflicts at Oso 31, \'~ Strongly positive • -new plant in industrial area 3B = ` — ___ Negative -new O plant ingenerally residential area 3C \I,. _ Negative -new O plant in generally residential area dA ` __ Positive -uses sites withgood buffers 4B __ Negative -new O plant in generally residential area 4C __ ? __ Neutral- Continues O residential conflicts at Oso and Greenwood 4D ..- Neutral - O r esidential conflicts at Oso Neighboring land use Land ownership Positive -no new ip land required for 20 years Strongly positive no new land • required for >30 years Strongly positive no new land • required for >30 years Negative -land O required for new plant Strongly negative -new O land required in residential area Strongly positive no new land • required for >30 years Negative - land O required for new plant Negative -land O required for new plant Negative - land O required for new plant Negative -land O required for new plant wPositive Existingtsat impacts Neutral- continues status quo -removes impac Greenwood and Oso Neutral- Continues impacts at Oso Positive - removes impac Greenwtsoodat and Oso Neutral- ontinuesim is pac atOso Creek Neutral- continues impacts atOso Creek Positive removes impacts at Oso Creek Neutral- continues im is impacts atOso Creek Neutral- ontinuesim is pac atOso Creek Neutral- continues impacts atOso Creek Flooding potential Negative - O requires new flood wall at Greenwood Positive - removes impact from flooding at Oso Creek Positive - removes impact from flooding at Oso Creek Positive - removes impact from flooding at Oso Creek Neutral -requires O additionalflood protection along Oso Creek Neutral -requires O additionalflood protection along Oso Creek Positive - removes impact from flooding at Oso Creek Neutral -requires O additionalflood protection along Oso Creek Neutral -requires O additionalflood protection along Oso Creek Positive - removes impact from W flooding at Oso Creek Restoration requirements Strongly positiveStrongly • Sminima, new pipelines required O Negative -new pipelines required O Negative -new pipelines required negative O -requires extensive pipeline construction Strongly negative O -requires extensive pipeline construction Strongly negative O -requires extensive pipeline construction O Negative -new pipelines required O Negative -new pipelines required O Negative -new pipelines required O Negative -new pipelines required Traffic c disruption o° Strongly positive •- minimal new pipelines required Neutral- new pipelines in generally open areas Neutral- new pipelines in generally open areas Negative- © pipelines cross built up areas Negative- © pipelines cross built up areas Negative- © pipelines cross built up areas Neutral- new pipehnesin generally open areas Neutral- new pipehnesin generally open areas Negative- © pipelines cross built up areas Neutral- new pipehnesin generally open areas Potentialfor Reuse Negative- Air. Long distanceLong to servicing industry Positive -Allison to plantcloseto industry Positive -Allison ip plant close to industry Strongly positive- • North plant close to industry Negative- distance to servicing industry Strongly negative -Longest distance to servicing industry Positive - North go plantcloseto industry Negative - Long distance to servicing industry Positive - North go plant close to industry Positive - North to plantcloseto industry Servicing t- new Development w Negative - needs new plant to o svice w growth ne Neutral -requires expansion of o pumping and plant Neutral -requires expansion of 0 pumping and plant Neutral -requires expansion of 0 pumping and plant Strongly positive • -closetonew growth Strongly positive • -closetonew growth Positive -can readily provide capacity for new growth Strongly positive • -closetonew growth Strongly positive • -closetonew growth Positive -can readily provide capacity for new growth 10, .� Efficiency of d O&M Strongly negative rTh _ continuesconsolidate operations at 6 sites Neutral- to twoconsolidate main plants, one m new Neutral- to two m main plants, one new Strongly positive- • consolidate to one main new plant Strongly positive- • consolidate to one main new plant Strongly positive - • consolidate to one main plant Positive - consolidate to two main plants, both new Positive - consolidate to two ain plants, both new Positive - consolidate to two main plants, both new Neutral - consolidate to two main plants, one new Flexibility for Fle,nburedoenelili consolidation Negative O faci-listatefuturenot consolidation Neutral- can O Whitecaponsolidate but not Broadway Neutral- can O Whitecaponsolidate but not Broadway Neutral- can O chroadwaybosolidate utnet Whitecap Negative O faci-dolistatefuturenot consolidation Neutral- can O Whitecapnsolidate but not Broadway Positive - can 40 Whdtecapandonsolidateboth Broadway Neutral- can nso O Whitecdateap but not Broadway Positive - can 40 Whdtecapandonsolidateboth Broadway Positive -can nso co Whitecdateapandboth Broadway Overall Rating 102 101 104 95 78 86 100 84 92 106 Novernber 2016 98th v s kaio Trac T ANY ® Stantec 1.5.6 Recommended Wastewater Servicing Option The highest ranked wastewater servicing option (identified as 4D) is to consolidate future wastewater treatment around two main facilities - a new North plant and the Oso plant. This is the recommended option. The components of this recommended Option 4D are shown on Figure 1-20 and summarized in Table 1-57. Figure 1-20 System Configuration of Recommended Option - Option 4D (,.) New Treatment Plant Close Treatment Plant j ,,,,, * Repair Treatment Plant A 10 Expand Treatment Plant —›Wastewater Pipeline Reuse Pipeline , „: , .., , , / ////4 2.5 nate C R kr G kaiokTisch &use November 2016 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration 62 to), Stantec LNV Table 1-56 Key Infrastructure Requirements for recommended Option 4D Plant Infrastructure Requirements Collection System • Repair system in accordance with requirements to reduce overflows • Redirect some flow from Greenwood to Broadway sewer shed in the interim Allison • Repair over next 10 years • Decommission the plant after 10 -years and build new pumping station to direct flows to the new North treatment plant. North Treatment Plant • Construct a new 12 MGD facility at the North treatment plant site in the next 5 years. • Provide effluent reuse facilities for industry in next 10 years Greenwood • Repair during 0 to 5 year period • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Greenwood site to transfer wastewater from Greenwood to the new North treatment plant site. Broadway • Repair over next 20 years Oso • Repair plant over next 20 years • Upgrade plant to BNR and expand to 20 MGD over next 5 years. Laguna Madre • Repair the existing plant over the next 5 years • Demolish the plant and decommission the existing site after the 5 year time period. • Build a new pumping station at the Laguna Madre plant to transfer wastewater from Laguna Madre to the Oso treatment plant. Whitecap • Repair over next 20 years 63 Optimal Wastewater Treatment Configuration November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse 000 Stantec LNV 2.0 Implementation Phasing Plan 2.1. Introduction Implementation of the wastewater management servicing plan is recommended to be undertaken over a series of phases in order to balance the use and availability of critical resources over a number of years. These critical resources including access to capital to fund the work; access to engineering and program management expertise; ability of City staffto administer the plan while other capital programs are ongoing; access to adequate contractors and trades; availability of key construction material inputs; and ability of operational staffto maintain the system while being trained on new or upgraded facilities. An outline of the preliminary proposed phasing is provided in the following sections. 2.1.1 First Phase North The new North treatment plant would be constructed in the northwest quadrant of the City in an area located between the CC International airport and the I-37 Highway. A specific property for this new plant has not been identified and it is recommended that the City investigate available parcels of approximately 80 acres or more in area, which would support an ultimate future site capacity of 60 MGD. The construction of this North plant would be staged to coincide with decommissioning of other facilities and increased flow from planned growth. The first phase of the North plant is expected to be a 12 MGD facility that would allow for decommissioning of the Allison and Greenwood plants. The new North plant would be provided with state of the art equipment allowing for an advanced level of treatment including screening and grit removal, primary clarification, fine bubble aeration, tertiary filtration, UV disinfection, anaerobic sludge digestion and thickening. A conceptual site plan for this new North plant is provided in Figure 2-1. Figure 2-1 Conceptual Site Plan for New North Treatment Plant NI 11, P.: ' 1;.- ' 0- 1 , 40 0 .- . , , :sy : , * - - 7"---- - Greenwood For the Greenwood service area, there is the potential for considerable future flow to occur depending on the City's policies with respect to planned new development. It is therefore proposed that the Greenwood pump station be located on the site of the Greenwood wastewater plant and planned in a flexible manner to allow construction in phases to match future flows. The first phase has been conceptually sized as a 30 MGD pump station with 42" diameter force main which is adequate for conveying the existing peak flows from the Greenwood facility to the North plant. The site layout plan will allow for an ultimate 90 MGD pump station and additional twinned force main which will be needed prior to future servicing of new developments south of Oso Creek. After the first phase of the pump station is commissioned, the remainder of the existing Greenwood plant will be decommissioned and the site can be made available for other uses. A conceptual layout of Greenwood and decommissioning of the existing treatment plant is provided in Figure 2-2. 64 Implementation Phasing Plan November 2016 Rc kailo'` TlschlerBlse Figure 2-2 Greenwood Pumping Station Site Plan Oso The expansion and upgrade of the Oso facility is proposed to include a full overhaul of all unit processes to bring these up to state of the art technology, providing for advanced levels of treatment with nutrient removal capability. The final treatment configuration will be determined after verification of the permitted effluent standards by TCEQ. In addition to upgrading with new technologies, the plant will be expanded to a 20 MGD average annual flow capacity initially and ultimately 24 MGD within the existing fence line. A conceptual site plan for the expanded Oso plant is shown on Figure 2-3. Figure 2-3 Preliminary Layout for Upgraded and Expanded Oso WRP Path C R kalio "` TischlerBise G LNV ® Stantec Laguna Madre After the Oso plant is upgraded and expanded, a pump station and force main will be constructed for conveyance of the wastewater from the Laguna Madre service area to Oso. It is proposed that the pump station be located on the existing site of the Laguna Madre wastewater plant and is expected to require a 10 MGD pump station with a 20" diameter force main to convey the peak wastewater flow to the Oso Plant. This initial conceptual sizing for this Laguna Madre PS and force main assume that it would be sized for the future anticipated peak flow from this service area. It is noted that the preferred route for the force main is through the NAS lands which are currently serviced with an independently owned and operated wastewater facility. The City and NAS are currently in discussion over potential opportunities to rationalize their separate wastewater operations, and this will be reviewed further prior to finalizing the size and route for the Laguna Madre force main. After the pump station is commissioned, the existing Laguna Madre plant will be decommissioned and the remaining site area can be made available for other uses. Collection System During the initial phase of the wastewater servicing plan, a range of collection system improvements will be undertaken as outlined in the Consent Decree currently under negotiation between the City and EPA. Many of these improvements will be located in the Broadway, Oso and Greenwood service areas and address existing deficiencies with service laterals, sewers and force mains via local pipeline rehabilitation, repair or replacement. Following these improvements, it is expected that the City will see a reduction in the extraneous flows due to inflow/Infiltration (I/I) and an associated reduction in the peak flows arriving at these facilities. The New Broadway facility has been constructed to meet an 8 MGD average annual capacity and a 20 MGD peak capacity. The design allowed for future capital improvements to increase the peak flow capacity to 40 MGD, but this work is currently on hold and will be deferred pending a review of the actual observed peak flows observed following the collection system improvements. Additional collection system modifications are under consideration that can rationalize the service area boundaries and provide best use of existing available treatment capacity. These potential projects include flow diversion from one or more of the Port/Pearse, McBride and Arcadia Lift Stations to the Broadway plant to reduce pressure on the Greenwood plant and better use the new Broadway Treatment facilities. The total potential for diversion from the Greenwood to the Broadway sewer sheds is estimated as 2 MGD on an annual average flow basis. Preliminary conceptual routing and associated infrastructure requirements for two of these potential flow diversions are presented here on Figures 2-4 and 2-5. November 2016 Implementation Phasing Plan 65 Stantec LNV Figure 2-4 Potential Force Main Routing for Flow Diversion from McBride Lift Station to Broadway WWTP Figure 2-5 Potential Force Main Routing for Flow Diversion from Arcadia Lift Station to Broadway WWTP Similarly, the existing Woodridge and Williams lift stations both currently pump to the Oso plant. These can readily be modified and provided with flexibility to pump flow over to the Greenwood plant site to relieve flow in the Oso service area. These and other collection system boundary adjustments will be implemented progressively as needed to balance flows during the time while the North plant is under construction. 2.1.2 Second Phase The second major phase of the management servicing plan is proposed to include the consolidation and decommissioning of the Allison WWTP. For purposes of this report, it has been assumed that the preferred strategy is for this work to be undertaken following construction and commissioning of the North plant. Allison Following construction of the North plant, pump stations and force mains will be constructed to allow conveyance of the wastewater from the Allison service area to the new facility. It is proposed that the Allison pump station be located on the existing site of the Allison wastewater plant and is expected to require a 15 MGD pump station with a 30" diameter force main to convey the peak wastewater flow from Allison to the North Plant. This initial conceptual sizing for this Allison PS and force main assume that it would be sized for the future anticipated peak flow from this service area. Further analysis can be undertaken prior to detailed design to determine if either additional future force mains, abooster pump stations or similar alternative strategy may be desirable. After the pump station is commissioned, the existing Allison plant will be decommissioned and the site can be made available for other uses. 2.1.3 Future Phases One major advantage of the preferred wastewater servicing plan is that it provides the City with considerable flexibility to adjust to future servicing requirements or regulatory conditions. Some of the scenarios are discussed below. Note that these potential capital projects have not been considered in the cash flow projections, since the timing and nature of these alternatives is uncertain. Greenwood As noted above, the Greenwood Pump Station will be planned to allow future expansion up to an expected ultimate 90 MGD peak capacity. This additional future flow could come from a variety of areas including new planned development south of Oso Creek or diversion of additional excess flow from new development in the existing Oso service area. Expansion of the Greenwood PS and construction of new force main capacity will be phased in as needed by these growth scenarios. Capital cost for these projects would need to be assessed against the new benefitting developments. Broadway The Broadway plant is about 5 years old and typically mechanical and electrical equipment is expected to last in the range of 20 to 30 years. That means that a major upgrade or rebuild maybe needed in approximately 20 years. Rather than invest in a significant capital upgrade, the City may at that time prefer to transfer the flow over to the North Plant and expand that facility. This would have operational advantages and could provide a longer time savings through additional consolidation. Whitecap The Whitecap facility is located on a barrier island and is remote from the other larger mainland facilities. Consolidation of this service area as part of the wastewater servicing plan is not considered cost effective and the plant is appropriately sized for the projected future flow. It is therefore recommended that it be maintained in its current location with occasional upgrading or repair as required. However, it is recognized that this location is vulnerable to catastrophic damage should a major hurricane strike the area. If such a disaster caused significant damage to the Whitecap facility, the City may prefer to construct a pump station and force main to connect to the mainland wastewater system rather than invest in a replacement 66 Implementation Phasing Plan November 2016 nein C R G kaio* Tiscs h lase plant. A conceptual route for this potential force main crossing of Laguna Madre would follow the route of New Humble Channel up to Bluffs Landings on Flour Bluff. Based on analysis done previously by the City for a water main crossing, this route provides an advantage since it is along disturbed boating channels and would minimize impacts on sea grasses Reuse The preferred option identifies potential for producing reuse quality water for sale to industry along the Ship Channel. There are currently a variety of competing projects under consideration for additional process and cooling water to industry, including a pilot desalination facility. It is therefore proposed that the design of the North plant allow for future addition of the necessary polishing treatment processes for industrial reuse water production but that these elements are not included until and unless the City has assurance that there is a means for cost recovery through sale of water to industry. 2.2. Project Risk Assessment 2.2.1 Introduction to Risk Assessment Many communities are using risk assessment to identify and quantify the severity of risk associated with capital projects. Each project has a different risk profile. Typical risk categories for infrastructure service delivery projects in general and in joint public-private projects are: • Site risk - a collection of risks that flow through the project land. An example of site risk is land acquisition, geotechnical, archaeological, existing condition, etc. • Design, construction and commissioning risk - all risks leading to liabilities and costs related to the design, construction and commissioning of the project on budget and on schedule. • Sponsor and financial risk - risks related to the sponsor's financial stability and security to protect the project on behalf of the public sector. • Operating risk - the consequence of operating risk related to the cost of operating the facility exceeding projections and/or the performance of the facility not meeting projections. • Market risk - risks related to the demand or price of the service resulting in not meeting the revenue projections etc. • Network and interface risk - risks related to the point of intersection between privately provided services and government controlled networks or services and where there is an interdependency of performance. • Industrial relations risk - risks related to labor disputes or action during construction and operational phases of the projects. nate C R kailo 3ischl re Bose LNV ® Stantec • Legislative and government risk - risks related to changes in legislation, government policy and the election of a new government that could impact the project. • Force majeure risk - risks outside the control of either party that impedes the provision of services during the contract period. • Asset ownership risk - risks related to the technical life of the project, or damage or destruction or premature obsolescence are some examples of this risk category. Quantification of risks can assist decision makers in the selection of options and identification and mitigation of project specific issues. For the wastewater management plan the use of risk assessment provides a good technique to highlight the risks that are known at this time. As the project develops and more information becomes available the risk assessment can be updated. Proposed mitigation strategies are presented in Section 4.4 of this report. 2.2.2 Risk Matrix A preliminary risk matrix (Table 2-1) has been prepared for Option 4D. Avariety of risk factors have been considered. These include siting risks, construction cost risk, constructability and a number of others. Each of these risks is ranked using a simple probability of occurrence using a 1 to 3 ranking. The risk impact is also ranked 1 to 3 with 1 being low impact and 3 being high impact. The factor of the probability and impact provides an overall risk factor. This technique is useful in providing a high level screening of risk factors. As the project develops more detailed risk assessment and workshops can be completed with various stakeholders and city staff. November 2016 Implementation Phasing Plan 67 Stantec LNV 2.2.3 Risk Ranking The project was ranked in consideration of the risk categories applicable to each of the major project components. The risks associated with each site under consideration for construction of facilities have been assessed. It also considers the risk associated with the various conveyance systems, social risks and construction risks. Table 2-1 Preliminary Risk Matrix RISK IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT Category Risk PROB. IMPACT RISK HIGH= 3 HIGH= 3 FACTOR HIGH > 5 MED = 2 MED = 2 MED 4-5 LOW =1 LOW= 1 LOW < 4 Risk Option 4D Greenwood WWTP site 3 2 6 • Flooding may occur before new North plant is constructed. • Nuisance impacts on neighbors before new plant is constructed. 2 2 4 Site • New North plant construction delayed increasing sustaining capital spend at Greenwood. 2 2 4 • Local stakeholders and/or regulator objects to ceasing discharge into Oso Creek. 1 3 3 • Unable to get easements for the proposed force mains 1 1 3 3 3 3 New North Plant • City unable to find a suitable site in the proposed area. • Significant public opposition to a new North plant 2 3 6 Site • Plant construction delayed. 2 3 6 • Discharge permit to ship channel is delayed or denied. 1 3 3 • Impact of new plant on adjacent residents 1 2 2 3 2 6 Oso WRP • TCEQ denies new effluent permit for plant Site • Adjacent residents oppose the expansion of the plant 3 2 6 • Plant constructability negatively impacted by existing configuration 3 3 9 • Expansion cost higher than estimated 2 3 6 Allison WWTP • Environmentalists oppose the cessation of the current effluent discharge. 2 2 4 Site • Neighborhood impacts associated with proposed pipeline construction to new North plant. 2 3 6 Site • Increased sustaining capital spend due to delay in transferring flow to North plant. 2 2 4 Laguna Madre • Neighborhood impacts associated with proposed pipeline construction to Oso WRP 2 2 4 • Increased sustaining capital spend due to delay in transferring flow to Oso. 2 2 4 68 Implementation Phasing Plan November 2016 Rc kailo'` TlschlerBlse LNV Stantec Category RISK IDENTIFICATION Risk RISI< PROB. HIGH = 3 MED=2 LOW =1 2 ASSESSMENT IMPACT HIGH= 3 MED=2 LOW= 1 2 RISK FACTOR HIGH > 5 MED4 5 LOW < 4 4 • General Public Acceptance of plan • Mitigation Strategies/ Costs higher than anticipated 2 2 4 Stakeholders • Loss of reuse water at locations that currently receive it. 2 1 2 • Social Concerns (concern with rate increases even though plan is one of least expensive) 2 2 4 • Treatment Technology Selection 2 1 2 Engineering • Resource Recovery 2 2 4 • Foundation/ Site Conditions 2 1 2 • Capital Cost/ Affordability 2 3 6 • Anticipated Operations/ Maintenance Costs savings not realized 2 3 6 • Lack of Available Funding 2 3 6 Financial • Funding Conditions/ Restrictions 2 2 4 • Cost Escalation 2 2 4 • Contingency Items 2 2 4 • Financing Costs 1 1 1 Procurement • Procurement Strategy 2 1 2 • Cost higher than anticipated 2 3 6 Construction • Market Conditions not conducive to competitive bidding 1 3 3 • Schedule/ Delays delaying O&M savings. 2 3 6 • Changes/ Claims 2 2 4 • Natural Disaster (hurricane) 1 3 3 Other • City doesn't have sufficient staff to administer the wastewater capital program according to the schedule 2 3 6 • Treatment System Failure (existing plants) 3 2 6 • Archaeological Conditions 1 2 2 2.3. Proposed Implementation Plan and Project Delivery 2.3.1 Project Delivery Options The use of terms and processes related to project delivery models are in the end all related to the degree of risk transfer or level of risks assumed by the private sector versus those retained by the public sector. Project risk is defined as the probability of an unfavorable event having a negative impact upon a project investment. Risk can be managed and/or mitigated. The selection of the appropriate project delivery method is based upon mitigation or delegation of project specific risks to those best able to manage them. A summary of available alternative delivery methods is summarized in the text that follows. Design/Bid/Build (DBB) is the traditional method of project delivery being used successfully for most water and wastewater capital projects in the United States. This method involves three basic participants: design professional (DP), general contractor and City (operating agency). Typically, a sequential approach is utilized for the design, construction and operation. In an attempt to integrate expertise of the participants, techniques including constructability reviews, operability reviews and value engineering are incorporated into the design bid build process. After construction, facilities are operated by City staff. Rath C R G kaiak use November 2016 Implementation Phasing Plan 69 Stantec LNV The first step of this method is to retain a design professional through a qualifications based selection (QBS) process. The design professional's responsibilities include determining facility requirements for the City, and defining (implicitly) many of the risk elements of the project. The design professional is responsible for the engineering design of the facility and the development of contract documents for competitive bidding by the City. In the second step, bids are tendered in conformance with the contract documents and the lowest responsive, responsible bidder is selected, without negotiations, to construct the facilities. Either the design professional, an independent engineer, or City staff assures that the builder's performance is in compliance with the contract documents and assists in resolving any issues or conflicts or both. The City retains design liability. Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) has two major participants in the contract with the City. The design professional is contracted by the City through a qualifications based selection (QBS) process and is responsible for the design. The construction manager is contracted by the City and is placed at risk early in the project for delivering the work within a guaranteed maximum price. The construction manager provides coordination services in lieu of a general contractor and provides design phase input and assistance. At some point in the design process, the construction manager and the City establish a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) to which the construction manager is contractually bound. The design professional provides conceptual and detailed requirements for the project use in developing a GMP. The City is involved during the design phase by bringing operations expertise into the project; however, once the GMP is established, changes in the project scope may impact the GMP. The construction manager provides design phase consultation in evaluating costs, schedule, implications of alternative designs and systems, and materials; and assumes the risk of construction after the GMP is established. The construction manager self performs portions of the construction and selects qualified construction subcontractors for the remaining portions to complete the work. The contract between the City and CM is typically structured to include an "off ramp" at the GMP stage. This allows the City to terminate the contract with the CM, direct the design professional to complete the design, and bid the project as a DBB if the GMP is considered too high. The selection of the CMAR by the City is based on their qualifications and generally occurs shortly after the selection of the design professional. The construction subcontractors are usually not selected until after the design phase is complete and are not involved in the design phase of the project. This method is best suited for large, new or rehab projects that are schedule driven, are difficult to define, or require construction input during the design phase. This method is least suited for small projects, or where projects are very well defined. Design/Build with City Operations involves a single entity contracted to provide both design and construction services. The City usually develops performance requirements for use in securing a design -builder. The design -builder contracts directly with subcontractors and is responsible for delivery and performance of the project, and specifically assumes design as well as construction liability. Selection of the design -builder is based on the proposal offering the best value to the City, in terms of qualifications, technical and business merit, and project costs. Independent technical, legal and/or financial consultant(s) may serve as City's agent(s) in managing the procurement process, establishing performance criteria and monitoring performance. A conceptual to preliminary design (10 to 30 percent) maybe prepared at the direction of the City to detail the prescriptive and performance requirements of the project. The design/build contract is negotiated based on a formal Proposal. The City can also execute the project under what is referred to as a progressive design build (PDB). The City has more input to the design under a progressive design build and can make changes as design progresses. Although the DB team provides an indicative price upon proposal submission the Contractor is not bound to this price. However, like CMAR the DB team will produce a GMP at a defined point in the design process (typically 60 to 70% design) which the team will be responsible for meeting. There is typically an opportunity for an "off ramp" at the GMP stage if the submitted price is not acceptable to the City. This delivery method requires the City to be knowledgeable of its needs and objectives for the project and be directly involved in the process. A key element to success is trust between the City and the design -builder, and the opportunity and necessity for the design professional and contractor to work closely together to develop the winning Proposal. For this method, the design -builder is provided with a description of the desired end -product or project outcome. The design -builder is responsible for developing the detailed design and specifications, selection of material and equipment, constructing the facility and meeting performance requirements. Proposers, oftentimes a team of design professional(s) and contractor(s), respond to a Request for Qualifications (RFQ). A short-listed group of qualified proposers responds to a Request for Proposals (RFP) by submitting technical, price and business proposals. The competition process, established early on in the procurement process by the City, ensures an award; which is primarily based on price, technical and financial qualifications. 70 Implementation Phasing Plan November 2016 R�rh ckaiak Tllscs h lase Design/Build/Operate (DBO) is similar to the design/ build method except that the long-term operation and maintenance (typically 20 years) of the facility is combined with the design and construction into a single service contract. A variation to the longterm operations and maintenance contract is to have a period of performance of less than 5 or 10 years, although the trend in today's market is for 20 -year contract operation periods. As with D/B, independent technical, legal and/or financial consultant(s) may serve as City's agent(s) in managing the procurement process, establishing performance criteria and monitoring performance. In the DBO method, the City has the ability to transfer a significant amount of responsibility and risk associated with a project to a single point of responsibility. That single party is responsible for the integration of design, construction, operation and maintenance expertise for the development of the facility in accordance with performance criteria established by the City. The primary purpose for combining the design, construction, operation and maintenance into a single contract is to effectively integrate all three areas of expertise and responsibility during all phases of the project. The single party, who will guarantee the performance of the full service contract, has the incentive to balance cost efficiencies and long-term operation and maintenance costs and establish an optimum lifecycle analysis. At the end of the contract cycle when the facilities are converted to City operations, contract requirements will need to state and prove that the facilities are fully functional, systems can continue to achieve permit compliance and condition of the equipment is appropriately maintained during the life of the contract. Proposers, generally a team of a design professional(s), contractor(s) and an operation and maintenance organization, respond to a Request for Qualifications (RFQ). A short listed group of qualified proposers then respond to a Request for Proposals (RFP) by submitting technical, commercial and legal proposals. The negotiation process, established early on in the procurement process by the City, ensures an award, which is primarily based on price, technical and financial qualifications. Contract negotiations are permitted, and it is not required that the lowest price proposer be selected if another proposer offers the best value overall. During the contract period, the City retains the ownership of the asset and responsibility for rate setting, billing, collection and administrative services. The Design/Build/Maintain (DBM) method is similar to DB, except that the longer term maintenance of the facility is combined with the design and construction into a single contract with the City operations. An independent consultant(s) may serve as the City's agent by assisting in establishing performance and maintenance requirements Rath C R G kaiak use LNV ® Stantec along with process performance and monitoring performance. The primary purpose for including an extended maintenance period (5 to 20 years) is to assure that the quality of equipment provided and the quality of installation are paramount. It moves the project delivery method closer to design/build/operate, except it allows for continued operation by the City. In the DBM method, the City has the ability to transfer significant responsibilities and risks associated with a constructed project to a single point of responsibility. The single party is responsible for the integration of design, construction and maintenance of the facility for a significant period of time in accordance with performance criteria established by the City. The City relinquishes significant project control to the DBM for design, construction and maintenance aspects of the facility. Since selection of the design -builder is not generally based solely on price, the City has the opportunity to consider qualifications and experience in the selection process. Since the City will own and operate the facilities, it must carefully evaluate standards of proposed predictive, preventive and corrective maintenance, as well as repair and replacement to ensure that the facilities operate efficiently and that the condition of equipment is appropriately maintained during the life of the contract. Standards need to be established so that at the end of the contract period, equipment is left in satisfactory condition. Proposers, generally a team of a design professional(s), contractor(s) and maintenance organization, respond to a Request for Qualifications (RFQ). A short listed group of qualified proposers then respond to a Request for Proposals (RFP) by submitting technical, commercial (business) and financial proposals. The negotiation process, established early on in the procurement process by the City, ensures an award, which is primarily based on price, technical and financial qualifications. The Design/Build/Finance/Operate (DBFO) method is similar to the DBO Method described previously except that the facility is financed by the DBFO entity during the design, construction and long-term operations period of the facility. DBFO is also sometimes referred to as P3 (Public -Private -Partnership). As with the DB method, independent technical, legal and/or financial consultant(s) may serve as the City's agent(s) in managing the procurement process, establishing performance criteria and monitoring performance. Service fee includes an allowance for construction debt service (as well as its operating and maintenance costs), and as a result the City will have no direct bond or debt service liability. If the contractor fails to provide service, the City can withhold the periodic service payments from the contractor, which includes the repayment of capital and interest. In extreme circumstances of default, the City can terminate the service contract. November 2016 Implementation Phasing Plan 71 Stantec LNV During the contract, the City retains ownership of the asset and also the responsibility for rate setting, billing, collection and administrative services. The Design/Build/Finance/Own/Operate (DBFOO) method is similar to the DBFO Method described above except that the facility is owned by the DBFOO entity during the long-term operations period of the facility. With this delivery method, the project is financed by the DBFOO entity. Again as with the DB method, independent technical, legal and/or financial consultant(s) may serve as the City's agent(s) in managing the procurement process, establishing performance criteria and monitoring performance. The DBFOO contractor, as the tax beneficial owner, will depreciate the project and contribute equity, which will reduce the amount of debt needed to finance the project. As a tradeoff, the contractor will own the project when the service contract expires, and the City must then purchase or rent the facilities at fair market value if it wishes to continue to receive service from the plant. The service fee includes an allowance for the contractor's debt service (as well as its operating and maintenance costs), and the City will have no direct bond or debt service liability. If the contractor fails to provide service, the contractor does not receive payment. If a resolution cannot be reached between the involved entities, termination of the service contract may occur with the project ownership reverting to the City without cost. The potential for such a provision can take the place of a service contract guarantee by the contractor. During the contract, the City retains the responsibility for rate setting, billing, collection and administrative services. The potential "value for money" increases with increasing private participation in the project. This comes with reduced owner control and higher procurement costs. The key to delivery of any project is to ensure that the "value - for -money" benefits outweigh the cost impact of that delivery. Therefore, it becomes important for the public sector to fully appreciate the risks related to the project and objectives the project is seeking to meet. Table 2-2 provides at a glance the sources for "value for money" or increased cost impact under each delivery model Table 2-2 Comparison of Project Delivery Options - Value for Money and Increased Cost Source For: Project Delivery Method DBB DB DBO DBFO (P3) for Money Value Better allocation of Risk Transfer Very low Low Medium High Reduced Whole Life Cycle Costs Low Low Medium High Better Incentive to Perform Low Medium High Very High Acceleration of Infrastructure Provision Low Some Some Medium Faster Implementation Low Medium High Very High Increased Costs Procurement Costs Low Medium High High Private Finance Premium None Low Low High Tax Leakage None None Medium High Profit Taking Medium Medium High High 72 Implementation Phasing Plan November 2016 R p Fri CR kailo'` TischlerBlse DESIGN BUILD OPERATE DESIGN BUILD FINANCE OPERATE DB DBO LNV ® Stantec A public entity gives up greater control over a project as they transfer risk to a private enterprise. This is illustrated in Figure 2-6. Figure 2-6 Relative Risk Transfer with Various Alternative Delivery Approaches TECHNICAL & FINANCIAL RISK ON PUBLIC ENTITY TRADITIONAL PUBLIC O&M DBFO PUBLIC BUILD OWN OPERATE PRIVATE DESIGN BUILD TURNKEY PRIVATE OPERATE AND MAINTAIN TECHNICAL & FINANCIAL RISK SHARING WITH PRIVATE ENTITY ALTERNATIVE larOg7_TilaltVIRIS PRIVATE PRIVATE BUILD OWN OPERATE In our experience the number of bidders on a project is driven by the chosen delivery method. We have typically seen more competitors bid DBB projects with fewer bidding DBFO or P3 pursuits. However, the more sophisticated delivery approaches tend to attract larger more sophisticated entities. The relative number of bidders typically bidding alternative water delivery projects is as indicated here in Figure 2-7. Figure 2-7 The Project Triangle - Anticipated Number of Bidders for Various Project Delivery Approaches DBFO 3 -4 Competitors DBO 3 - 5 Competitors DB 5 - 7 Competitors \Ns\ The Texas Legislature enacted enabling legislation starting around 2011 to allow delivery of civil projects, including water infrastructure projects, using alternative delivery methods such as Construction Manager at -Risk (CMAR), Design Build (DB), and Public Private Partnership (P3) and their variations. A number of water projects have been undertaken via alternative delivery in the last few years and interest is growing among water utilities to use these methods. A summary of some recent Texas water project undertaken via alternative delivery is summarized as Table 2-3. Path C R G kaiok Tisch &use November 2016 Implementation Phasing Plan 73 Stantec LNV Table 2-3 Examples of Recent Alternative Delivery Water Projects in Texas City/Utility Project Project Size Delivery Method Primary Driver for Selected Delivery Method SAWS Vista Ridge Water Supply Project $450 M P3 Transfer of risk of capital funding to private sector eliminating the need to bond the project. City of Midland T Bar Well Field 35 MGD well field P3 City was essentially out of water due to drought. Project timing drove decision to go P3. City of Houston North East Water Treatment Facility $1 Billion 240- mgd expansion PDB City needs to be off groundwater by 2024 so timing was the driver. Austin 80-mgd North Water Treatment Plant $500 M CMAR One of the primary drivers was to better manage constructability risks. San Jacinto River Authority 30-mgd WTP $150M CMAR Primary driver was to minimize constructability risks and minimize construction cost overruns. 2.3.2 Proposed Implementation Plan 2.3.2.1 Summary of Key Project Elements and Associated Risks The key project elements associated with implementation of Option 4D along with the key implementation risks are summarized here in Table 2-4. Rehabilitation and small upgrade projects identified in the physical condition survey would likely be delivered under traditional DBB delivery or some form of job order contracting (JOC) arrangement. Table 2-4 I<ey Project Elements and Associated Critical Implementation Risks Project Time Frame Estimated Cost ($M) Key Risk Elements Oso WRP BNR upgrade and Expansion 0-5 year $72 M • Constructability associated with existing plant • Impact of construction on existing plant operations. • Inability to secure discharge permit. • Higher cost due to unforeseen circumstances. • Estimated operations cost savings not achieved. Greenwood PS and Force main 0-5 Year $73 M • Ability to secure required easements for force main. • Delay in PS and force main construction delays flow transfer to North plant and increases Greenwood WWTP sustaining capital spend. • Traffic impacts during construction. • Flooding of construction site. Laguna Madre PS and Force main 6 10 year $18 M • Ability to get permit for Oso Bay pipeline crossing. • Securing required easements for force main. • Traffic impacts during construction. New North WWTP 0-5 year $103 M • Ability to secure suitable project site. • Delay in getting effluent discharge permit for new plant. • New plant construction not completed on time resulting in additional sustaining capital spend at Greenwood. • Greenwood PS and force main not ready in time to commission new plant. • Operations cost savings not attained post construction. Allison PS and Force main 11-15$22 years M • Securing required easements for force main. • Traffic impacts during construction. 74 Implementation Phasing Plan November 2016 Haigh C R kali©'` Tischl reBEse• The key risks for the Laguna Madre PS and force main, Allison PS and force main and similar projects are related to securing easements and neighborhood issues such as traffic impacts. The City is likely in the best position to deal with these risks and a DB contractor would likely charge a significant risk premium to deal with these risks. In addition, all of these projects can be constructed by smaller contractors and none is particularly time sensitive. For these reasons, a competitive DBB procurement is most appropriate for these four projects. The Greenwood PS and force main, North WWTP, and Oso WRP projects are time sensitive. The North WWTP will also not be able to be started up until the Greenwood PS is operational. This suggests the most appropriate approach to constructing these two projects is to execute these in parallel or as one large project. The most appropriate approach from a timing perspective would be to bid these projects as two separate projects allowing contractors and contracting teams to bid both and offer potential cost and schedule efficiencies to the City. 2.3.2.2 Multiple Criteria Analysis The Multi -Criteria Analysis (MCA) is a qualitative analysis evaluation method which uses criteria based on the project goals and procurement objectives to compare the procurement models. A matrix evaluation is used to score and rank each of the alternatives. The projects that were evaluated via MCA included: • Greenwood PS and Force Main • New North WWTP • Oso WRP BNR Upgrade and Expansion The MCA matrix was constructed and presented during a workshop with City staff. In the dedicated workshop, qualitative criteria were reviewed for inclusion in the analysis and finalized. Weightings and scoring was then reviewed and finalized. The use of the Multiple Criteria Analysis helped determine the alternative that maximizes overall value of the project and also meets established project criteria compared against the others and leads to the recommended procurement model. Rath C 1" R kalio "` TischlerBise G LNV ® Stantec The following project delivery methods are recommended based upon the results of the MCA analyses: • Greenwood PS and Force Main (DB) • New North WWTP (DBO) • Oso WRP BNR Upgrade and Expansion (CMAR) The City plans to offer industrial reuse water to interested industries in the next 10 -years. The timing for providing reuse water depends upon interest and ability to bring a minimum number of industries under contract to support the capital investment. The market risk and associated implementation is something the private sector is better equipped to manage than the City. For these reasons, we are recommending Industrial Reuse be implemented as a P3 project. 2.4. Interim Operations Plan 2.4.1 Introduction The transition from the existing six plant operation to a four plant operation over the next 20 years requires careful planning to reduce the risk of over -spending on facilities destined to be taken out of service while maximizing O&M savings associated with anticipated staffing reductions. The currently proposed project schedule allows the City to reduce the existing treatment plant upgrading costs presented in Table 2-9 by approximately $133 M. As the facilities are improved, replaced, or removed from service, current staffing levels need to be adjusted to provide acceptable levels of operation and improved levels of maintenance. We are estimating an overall staffing reduction of 13 full-time equivalents (FTEs) during the first 15 years of the plan. The estimated reduction in repair costs quoted previously were based on the facilities being removed from service in the first 5 years. Schedule slippage will require additional sustaining capital spend to keep existing facilities in service. Should schedule slippage occur, a review of the proposed projects should be conducted and implementation of deferred projects should be initiated. November 2016 Implementation Phasing Plan 75 Stantec `NV 2.4.2 Optimization of Existing Plant Repair Program The consulting team met with senior plant operations staff to critically review the list of upgrading and repair projects identified during the physical condition survey and summarized in Section 1.1.2. The primary objectives of these meetings was to identify the most critical projects required to allow safe and reliable operations and ongoing permit compliance until such time as the facility is taken out of service. This optimization exercise reduces the capital cost for Option 4D by a further $ 50 M. The revised overall capital spend for Option 4D would therefore be $ 776 M. These projects should be reviewed with City senior staff prior to finalizing the overall capital program. 2.4.3 Staffing Transition Plan The primary driver for selecting Option 4D was the potential for O&M cost savings through a reduction in current staffing levels. The consulting team reviewed existing labor categories as part of this assessment to confirm the City has the appropriate mix of skills on staff and in future. Our initial review suggests the City has a large number of staff working in operations and very few if any maintenance related staff. A transition plan is therefore required to begin transitioning plant staffing from a primarily operations oriented focus to a combination of operations and maintenance staffing. As vacancies occur in the facility staffing, a long term view of filling vacancies based on future skill needs should be utilized. A preliminary recommendation on staffing levels by employment category over the next 15 years is presented in Table 2-5. The information provided in the table serves as the basis for development of a staffing transition plan in consultation with the City. The final plan needs to take into account anticipated attrition rates, existing skill levels and future skills requirements. Job descriptions need to be developed for each of the identified employment categories as part of the final staffing plan development. Table 2-5 Preliminary Recommendation on Staffing Levels by Employment Category FTE Classification Existing Proposed Year 5 Proposed Year 10 Proposed Year 15 Final Change from Existing Lead Operator 4 3.5 3.5 3 -1 Operator 57 31 31 27 -30 Maintenance Mechanic 12 12 11 +11 Electrician 3 3 3 +3 Instrument Tech 3 3 3 +3 Laborer 1 1 1 +1 TOTAL 61 53.5 53.5 48 -13 Several assumptions were made concerning staffing levels. Staffing at New Broadway WWTP and Whitecap WWTP were maintained at current levels until such time as facility and equipment improvements were made and an extensive SCADA system has been implemented. SCADA allows for remote monitoring and control and is an integral part of the cost reduction plan. New facilities include extensive SCADA control, energy efficient systems and energy recovery where appropriate. The staffing plan will need to include a significant increase in maintenance staffing levels. During the Facility and Operational assessments it became evident that required maintenance levels at all the facilities were not being met. In order to obtain cost savings over the study period, maintenance levels at the facilities must increase. Maintenance staffing must be accomplished through skill based assessments of existing staff with reassignment and/or retraining and hiring from outside where required. It should be noted, that the current recommendation is based upon completing the North WWTP as a DBO with operations provided by a private operator. This use of a private operator will reduce the overall staff contingent by a further 14 staff for the duration of the operating portion of the DBO contract. This issue requires further discussion with City management staff. 76 Implementation Phasing Plan November 2016 Rp Fri CR kailo'` TlschlerBise 2.4.4 Operations During Construction The three primary construction projects associated with Option 4D include the Greenwood PS and force main, new North WWTP, and Oso WRP upgrade and expansion. We are proposing the following during the construction phase of each project: • The existing plant operations staff will continue to operate the Oso WRP during construction. The CM will prepare a detailed bypass and shut down plan in consultation with the City and design engineer to minimize the impact upon existing plant operations. • The DBO contractor for the new North Treatment Plant will operate the new facility for a minimum of two years post -construction. We are proposing the operations of the new Greenwood PS be included in the DBO contractors scope of operation. The Greenwood PS and North WWTP operations would be transferred over to the City at the end of the operations contract. • All other plants would continue to be operated by existing City O&M staff. 2.5. Stakeholder Management Plan Although a great deal of information and knowledge has been gathered from stakeholders in this exploratory phase of the project, there is more to be learned as it relates to the development of a stakeholder management plan as we prepare for the planning and implementation phases of the project. An effective stakeholder management plan is built upon a process that is values -based, decisions -oriented and goal -driven. Some of the key elements of a successful stakeholder engagement plan include: • Effective stakeholder engagement acknowledges the desire for humans to participate in decisions that affect them. • Effective stakeholder engagement facilitates understanding. • Effective stakeholder engagement improves decisions by - bringing all perspectives to the table, - identifying critical issues early; and, - promoting opportunities for the building of understanding and balanced review of the problem or opportunity. We are recommending a follow-up workshop to determine the stakeholder management plan elements for the next phase of the project once the City has adopted the proposed long term servicing option and associated program elements. This workshop will establish critical components to implement as part of the stakeholder engagement plan. Some of these elements may include: R nth c R kaiak Tisc r use ® e G LNV ® Stantec • Stakeholder Baseline Data • Background review of stakeholder groups • Review and assessment of stakeholder issues and expectations • Decision scope and timeline, as it relates to stakeholder engagement • Stakeholder engagement process objectives • Determine the level of engagement and promise the following to the stakeholders: - INFORM > "We will keep you informed." - CONSULT > "We will keep you informed, listen to your concerns and provide feedback on decisions made." - INVOLVE > "We will ensure your concerns are directly reflected in the alternatives developed and provide feedback on decisions made." - COLLABORATE > "We will look to you for the advice and innovation in formulating solutions and incorporate your advice and recommendations in to the decisions made." - EMPOWER > "We will implement what you decide." • Stakeholder Engagement Techniques • Information required by stakeholders, related to (1) process and (2) content • Input needed from stakeholders • Engagement technique selection (some potential techniques for this projects below) - Public Information Campaign - Project Advisory Committee • Feedback required from stakeholders • Stakeholder Engagement Evaluation • Evaluate each technique. • How did it contribute to achieving the technique objective? • Analyze each stakeholder engagement objective. • How did it contribute to achieving the stakeholder management plan objectives? • Evaluate the contribution of the overall stakeholder engagement process to the project planning and implementation phases of the project. - How did it contribute to achieving the overall project objective? The project team recommends this stakeholder engagement planning workshop take place in early September, so the plan can be utilized and implemented during all future phases of the project. Workshop participants should include City staff and stakeholders who have been actively engaged in the WWMP project thus far. November 2016 Implementation Phasing Plan 77 Implementation Programming Schedule /Pis' psl 350 0.£ UCMOSS `NV Stantec 3.0 Implementation Programming Schedule 3.1. Introduction The proposed program implementation schedule is presented in this section. The main objectives were to: • Identify the trigger factors for each of the key project elements. • Identify critical risk factors associated with project implementation and the appropriate risk mitigation plan to address these. • Present the final capital improvement plan schedule and projects. 3.2. Project Implementation Triggers The City has asked that the consulting team identify implementation triggers for each of the key projects. It should be noted that reasonable implementation triggers have long passed for most if not all of the key projects identified in this report. The rationale for this statement is summarized as follows: • The majority of future growth is anticipated to occur in both the Oso and Greenwood sewer shed. The 2015 flow for the Oso and Greenwood plants are at 82% and 79% of the plants respective rated capacities. According to the Texas Administrative Code (TAC) 305.126(a) "whenever flow measurements for any sewage treatment plant facility in the state reaches 75 percent of the permitted average daily or annual average flow for three consecutive months, the permittee must initiate engineering and financial planning for expansion and/or upgrading of the wastewater treatment and/or collection facilities." Currently Greenwood WWTP and Oso WRP are beyond the 75 percent threshold and planning will have to take place to satisfy the TAC 305.126(a) ruling. Plant expansion is required at both Oso and Greenwood now. Path C R G kaiak Tisch &use • The Greenwood plant is located within the floodplain and the site has flooded twice this year. This has indirectly resulted in a spill to nearby La Volla Creek. The existing plant is in poor physical shape and requires over $60 M in repair. The existing plant needs to be replaced now. Therefore, construction of the new North WWTP needs to proceed as soon as possible. • Building a new plant to replace the existing Greenwood facility will take approximately five years meanwhile the site and local residents are susceptible to flooding impacts. Doing nothing for the next five years while residents wait is not recommended. The redirection of flows from the McBride and Arcadia Pumping Stations to the Broadway WWTP will reduce the flow to Greenwood in the short term reducing flooding potential. These projects will also increase the use of reserve capacity at the Broadway WWTP which the City paid over $50 M for only three years ago. • Priority projects (0 to 5 year time period) identified during the physical condition survey need to be reviewed with City staff and the most critical projects need to proceed now. • The work plan for the collection system outlined in the upcoming consent decree cannot wait and the City needs to proceed with the identified program in an expeditious manner. Key projects that can be delayed, and the associated trigger factor for these include: • Construction of the Allison PS and force main to direct flow from the Allison sewer shed to the new North Plant. The trigger for this work is completion of the North plant construction. • Construction of the Laguna Madre PS and force main to direct flow from the Laguna Madre sewer shed to the upgraded and expanded Oso WRP. The trigger for this work is completion of the planned plant expansion at Oso. November 2016 Implementation Programming Schedule 78 Stantec LNV 3.3. Proposed Program Implementation Schedule The proposed implementation schedule for the key projects is summarized here in Table 3-1 measured from the point of decision for start of the wastewater management plan. The implementation schedule is presented in five year increments. The detailed cash flow spend is presented in the cash flow model enclosed here as Appendix F. Table 3-1 Program Implementation Schedule Program Element Implementation Time Frame Cost 0-5 yr. 6-10 yr. 11-15 yr. 16-20 yr. Collection System Upgrades Associated with Reducing Overflows $382 M Allison WWTP Repair and Rehab $17 M Allison PS and Force main $22 M Broadway WWTP Repair and Rehab $15 M Oso WRP Repair and Rehab $81 M Oso WRP BNR Upgrade & Expansion $72 M Greenwood Repair and Rehab $14 M Greenwood PS and Force main $73 M Laguna Madre Repair and Rehab $7 M Laguna Madre PS and Force main $18 M New North WWTP $103 M Whitecap WWTP Repair and Rehab $23 M 3.4. Risk Management Plan Awide range of risks can impact the successful execution of this overall wastewater servicing program. The full range of these risks was highlighted in Section 3.3. These risks can generally be grouped into two broad categories - those that impact the scope through project planning and those that impact results of the project execution. As noted in the Section 3.4, dividing the program into suitable sized projects and selecting an appropriate project delivery method for each project can manage the risks associated with the execution including the procurement, design, construction, operation and maintenance. Assigning responsibility for each element of the project execution to the team or professionals most able to control the outcomes will typically result in an overall lower risk to the City. However, the planning level risks such as site selection, permitting, and regulatory compliance are of a fundamental nature that remain with the City and cannot easily be transferred to a DB, DBO or P3 partner. In particular, there is a considerable degree of uncertainty with respect to the regulatory regime and future treatment requirements for both existing and new plants. Each of the existing facilities operates under a permit from TCEQwhich is renewable every five years. Of the six existing facilities, one permit renewal (Oso) is administratively complete but is still under review; two permits (Laguna Madre and New Broadway) have recently expired and need renewal; and three permits (Greenwood, Whitecap and Allison) expire within the next 18 months. There is no certainty that renewal will be given in a timely manner or with similar conditions to current permits. The City currently is experiencing considerable increased costs to meet new permit requirements at aged facilities that were never designed to provide that level of treatment. The risk of continued changes to future treatment requirements is one of the primary drivers leading the City to consider consolidation of their facilities. The evaluation of the wastewater servicing options has considered this regulatory uncertainty and higher weighting was given to options that were flexible to adapt to future requirements. The identified project elements of the preferred Option 4D as described above are the most likely outcomes based on the consultant team's evaluation of the current and future requirements. These outcomes may however need to be adapted to meet future changes in conditions and it is recommended that a range of potential alternative strategies should be identified. The highest priority elements for the Option 4D are the expansion of the Oso plant and construction of the new North plant. A summary of potential risk elements, assessed risk factor (Low, Medium or High) and alternative strategies for these two sites are provided in Table 3-2. It should be noted that any high risk elements have already been addressed in the proposed project elements for the preferred option. 79 Implementation Programming Schedule November 2016 nein C R G lk hallo'' TNschr ii se. LNV Stantec Table 3-2 Potential Alternative Strategies Project/Site Key Risk Elements Risk Alternative Strategy Oso WRP BNR upgrade and Expansion Unable to continue use of existing site Low • Pump flow to Laguna Madre and build new plant on that site (as per Option 4A) Oso WRP BNR upgrade and Expansion Unable to renew permit for existing discharge to Oso Bay Med • Keep Oso plant on site but consider alternative outfall discharge such as Corpus Christi Bay or Laguna Madre OR • Pump flow to Laguna Madre and build new plant on that site (as per Option 4A) Oso WRP BNR upgrade and Expansion Unable to secure permit for expanded discharge to Oso Bay Med • Keep Oso plant at existing size, redirect south portion of service area and Laguna Madre to Greenwood PS and pump to North Plant (Alternative Option 4E) Oso WRP BNR upgrade and Expansion Unable to secure permit for any discharge to either Oso Bay or Laguna Madre Low • Pump flow from Oso to North plant and build larger new plant (as per Option 3A) New North WWTP Unable to secure a new site Low • Build new plant on existing Allison site (Option 2B) New North WWTP Unable to secure a permit for discharge into Ship Channel Low • Consider discharge to one or combination of Oso Creek and/or Nueces River As noted above, many of the Alternative Scenarios incorporate elements of the other wastewater servicing options considered earlier during the evaluation process. There will be opportunity to refine these strategies further once more clarity is available on some of these risk elements, especially regarding the permit renewal for Oso WRP. For instance, one "hybrid" option that can be implemented is to split the Oso service area roughly in half along the line of the SPID. The new development and growth in the southern half can be pumped to the new North Plant via the Greenwood PS and the northern half can continue to flow to and be treated at the existing Oso WRP. This Alternative - called Option 4E is depicted in Figure 3-1. Figure 3-1 Alternative Option 4E Legend New Treatment Plant Close Treatment Plant Repair Treatment Plant - Wastewater Pipeline 3 Reuse Pipeline 2.5 10 AWi Path C R G kalnkTisch &Ise November 2016 Implementation Programming Schedule 80 Stantec LNV 3.5. Fund Requirement Schedule The estimated cash flow requirements for the recommended servicing plan are summarized here in Table 3-3. All capital costs are presented here in 2016 constant dollars. The capital spend by project and year is included with the cash flow models presented in Appendix F. Table 3-3 Summary of Fund Requirements Program Element Collection System Upgrades Associated with Reducing Overflows Implementation Time Frame 0-5 yr. 6-10 yr. 11-15 yr. 16-20 yr. $127 M $127 M $127 M Allison WWTP Repair and Rehab $13 M $4 M Allison PS and Force main $22 M Broadway WWTP Repair and Rehab $11 M $3 M $1 M Oso WRP Repair and Rehab $54 M $3 M $6 M $18 M Oso WRP BNR Upgrade & Expansion $72 M Greenwood Repair and Rehab $14 M Greenwood PS and Force main $73 M Laguna Madre Repair and Rehab $7 M Laguna Madre PS and Force main $18 M New North WWTP $103M Whitecap WWTP Repair and Rehab $19 M $2 M $2 M TOTALS $493 M $155 M $157 M $21 M The total estimated capital spend for Option 4D is approximately $826 M with O&M savings over the next 30 -years of approximately $60 M relative to the benchmark option of maintaining the six existing wastewater treatment plants. 81 Implementation Programming Schedule November 2016 Rc kailo'` TischlerBlse 5 Stantec AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of May 23, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of May 30, 2017(Tabled to June 13, 2017) DATE: May 23, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager THROUGH: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager FROM: Dan Grimsbo, Interim Executive Director of Utilities DanG@cctexas.com (361) 826-1718 Approving an Extension to the Agreement with Valero Refining — Texas, L.P. for recycled water CAPTION: Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a Sixty-day Extension to the Agreement for Exclusive Reservation of Recycled Water with Valero Refining — Texas, L.P. (Valero) for 4 million gallons per day (mgd). PURPOSE: To obtain Council's review and approval; for the Sixty-day Extension to the Agreement for Exclusive Reservation of recycled water with Valero Refining. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: In 2013, Valero expressed an interest in exploring the possibility of receiving and using the City's recycled water for cooling tower and other industrial use applications at both of its local Refineries doing business as the Valero Corpus Christi West Refinery and the Valero Corpus Christi East Refinery. On December 17, 2013, the City of Corpus Christi and Valero Refining -Texas, L.P., entered into an Agreement for Exclusive Reservation of Recycled Water, out of the Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant, with a term of nine months, with an option to extend the Reservation Agreement for an additional three month period. During the initial reservation agreement term, Valero expressed preference to use the recycled water from the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant (GWWTP) in lieu of the recycled water from the Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant (BWWTP). The agreement was amended twice and extended most recently in December 2015 for additional periods which will expire on June 16, 2017. A short-term extension to the reservation agreement totaling an additional 60 days is presented for City Council consideration to allow time for the adoption of Wastewater Management Plan by City Council at which time a longer-term agreement could be put in place. Under the terms of this Extension to the Agreement for Exclusive Reservation, the City agrees not to enter into any other agreement or reservation for treated wastewater effluent that would in any way restrict the City's ability to furnish Valero the 4.0 MGD of treated wastewater effluent subject to this extension. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the Extension to the Agreement as proposed. 2. Request changes to the proposed Extension to the Agreement. 3. Deny authority to execute the Extension to the Agreement. 4. Deny authority to execute the Amendment and Extension to the Agreement and direct staff to issue an RFP for Industrial use of the City's recycled water. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: The city's wastewater treatment plants produce recycled water that is classified as Type II reclaimed water. TCEQ has granted the City certain authority to deliver its recycled water for the Type II uses allowed under Chapter 210 of the Texas Administrative Code (TAC). Some of the City's golf course and cemetery customers use the City's recycled water for the Type II -allowable use of irrigating their golf courses and cemeteries. Although the law also allows for the use of Type II for cooling towers and other industrial applications, none of the City's Industrial district customers are using the City's recycled water at this time. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This item conforms to City policy to obtain Council's approval and authority to grant an interest in real property or the city asset of water, which is considered to be a real property -like asset. For our purposes here, the term water as used in this section includes treated wastewater, also known as "effluent", or "recycled water". An industrial water customer's use of the City's recycled water for allowable industrial uses is consistent with the City's water conservation policies. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating 0 Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2015-2016 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Water Comments: RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the Reservation as proposed. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Agreement for Exclusive Reservation of Recycled Water approved December 17, 2013 (First) Amendment and Extension to the Agreement approved December 16, 2014 (Second) Amendment and Extension to the Agreement approved December 15, 2015 Extension to the Agreement for Exclusive Reservation of Recycled Water Between Valero Refining -Texas, L.P. and City of Corpus Christi Agreement for Exclusive Reservation of Recycled Water Between Valero Refining —Texas, L.P. and City of Corpus Christi This Agreement for Exclusive Reservation of Recycled Water (the "Reservation") is made by and between The City of Corpus Christi, acting by and through its authorized representative, the City Manager or designee (the "City"), and Valero Refining — Texas, L.P. ("Valero"). Valero and the City may hereinafter be referred to as a "Party" or collectively as the "Parties". WHEREAS, Valero operates two petroleum refineries located in Corpus Christi, Texas; WHEREAS, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality has issued an Authorization for Reclaimed Water to the City that provides the City with certain authority for the use and transfer of reclaimed water or treated wastewater effluent, referred to in this Agreement as "recycled water"); WHEREAS, Valero would like time to evaluate entering into a recycled water agreement with the City; NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed by and between the Parties as follows: I. Reservation. A. Term and Fee. For and in consideration of payment of a reservation fee in the amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) to be paid within thirty days of the date the City Manager or the City Manager's designee signs this Reservation, the City will reserve for the exclusive benefit of Valero the capacity for delivery of up to 4 million gallons per day (mgd) of recycled water/treated wastewater effluent from the new Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant (BWWTP), or 4 million mgd from any of the City's other wastewater treatment plants in the event that the City will no longer be operating the BWWTP . The Reservation shall start on the Effective Date and expire nine months from the Effective Date. During the term of the Reservation, the City shall not enter into any other agreement or reservation for the 4.0 mgd of treated wastewater effluent from the BWWTP or an amount of treated wastewater effluent that would in any way restrict the City's ability to furnish Valero the 4.0 mgd of treated wastewater effluent subject to this Reservation. The nine-month reservation period is to allow Valero time for evaluation, equipment pilot testing and water quality testing to confirm suitability of the recycled water and any onsite treatment cost for the intended industrial applications. Before the expiration of the Reservation, Valero will inform the City in writing if it intends to enter into a recycled water agreement(s) for either or both of its local refineries dba the Valero Corpus Christi West Refinery and the Valero Corpus Christi East Refinery. 8. Effective Date. The Effective Date of this Reservation is the date upon which it is signed by the City. 2013-360 12/17/13 M2013-196 Valero Refining - Texas LP 1 INDEXED C. Termination. The City may terminate this Reservation in the event that Valero fails to timely pay the $100,000.00 reservation fee and Valero has been provided written notice of this failure and thirty (30) days to cure. D. Extension. Valero may request to extend this Reservation for an additional three-month period by providing the City with a written request at least thirty (30) days prior to the termination date of this Agreement. If the City approves Valero's request to extend this Reservation, upon Valero's payment of a reservation extension fee of Seventy -Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000.00), which must be received by the City before the termination date, this Reservation will extend for a period of three months. The extended Reservation shall be exclusive and during the extended term of the Reservation, the City shall not enter into any other agreement or reservation for the 4.0 mgd of treated wastewater effluent from the BWWTP or an amount of treated wastewater effluent that would in any way restrict the City's ability to furnish Valero the 4.0 mgd of treated wastewater effluent subject to this Reservation. E. Notices. Any notice provided for in this Reservation and any other notice, demand or communication which any Party may wish to send to any other Party relating to the subject matter of this Reservation shall be in writing and either delivered by recognized national overnight courier delivery service such as Federal Express, UPS or DHL, hand -delivered, or sent by regular U.S. postage prepaid, and addressed to the Party for which such notice, demand, or communication is intended at such Party's address as provided below. Copies of all notices to Valero shall include a copy to: If to Valero: Valero Refining—Texas, L.P. 1147 Cantwell Lane Corpus Christi, TX 78249-1616 Attn: Joe Almaraz Telephone: 361-289-3328 Facsimile: 361-289-3126 If to the City: City of Corpus Christi 2726 Holly Road Corpus Christi, TX 78415 Attn: Gustavo Gonzalez, Director of Water Operations Telephone: 361-826-1874 Facsimile: 361-826-1889 City of Corpus Christi 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Attn: Veronica Ocanas, Senior Assistant City Attorney Telephone: 361-826-3375 Facsimile: 361-826-3239 Any Party may change its address for notice hereunder to any other address by giving written notice of such new address to the other Parties in accordance with this Section. Any notice, demand, or other communication shall be in English, and shall be deemed given and effective as of the date of delivery. The inability to deliver because of a changed address of which proper 2 notice was not given, or rejection or other refusal to accept any notice, demand or other communication, shall be deemed to be the receipt of the applicable notice, demand or other communication as of the date of such inability to deliver or rejection or refusal to accept. The date of notice shall be the date it is received by the addressee or the office of the addressee, whichever is earlier. II. Negotiation of Recycled Water Agreement Terms Within the Reservation Period. A. The Two Refineries. Upon written notice at any time during the term of this Reservation from Valero that it wishes to enter into a recycled water agreement for 4 mgd of recycled water, the Parties will negotiate the terms of any agreement in good faith. III. Reservation is Not a Reclaimed Water Supply Agreement. A. The Parties recognize that this Reservation is an agreement to reserve 4 mgd for a period of time, not an agreement to supply or deliver 4 mgd; that this Reservation neither outlines the specific and essential terms for the delivery or supply of recycled water, nor contains any prices or quantities for the delivery or supply of recycled water; and that a future agreement(s) between the Parties will be required. IV. Miscellaneous Terms. A. Complete Agreement. This Reservation embodies the entire agreement between the Parties hereto relating to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes and replaces in their entirety all prior understandings and agreements relating to the subject matter hereof. 8. Severability. Should any provision of this Reservation or portion hereof be declared invalid, void or unenforceable, it shall not affect the validity or enforcement of the remaining provisions or portion hereof which shall remain in full force and effect as if the Reservation had been executed without such invalid, void or unenforceable provision or portion hereof having been included. C. Assignment. The Parties may not assign the Reservation without the written consent of the other party. D. Modification and Waiver. This Reservation may not be modified or amended except by an instrument in writing duly executed by both Parties. Either party hereto may, by an instrument in writing, waive compliance with or breach of any term or provision of the Reservation by the other Party. The waiver by any Party hereto of compliance with or breach of any term or provision of the Reservation shall not be construed as a waiver of subsequent compliance or of any subsequent breach. E. Authority. Each person executing the Reservation represents that he or she has been duly authorized to do so by the Party on whose behalf he or she is signing, and that in so doing he or she shall bind such Party to all of the terms hereof. 3 F. Counterparts. The Parties may execute the Reservation in identical multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute but a single instrument. 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Reservation to be effective upon approval by the City. VALERO: CITY: VALERO REFINING—TEXAS, L.P. By: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI By: Name: Dennis Payne Name: 8/2(f 4 l3 4%'ri? ff% Title: Senior Vice President & General Manager Title: DIP4 ry p(2f.rie 4I442 - Date: /EX/3(2-0(5 Date: 12- - ( 7-13 ATTEST . 1 ARMANDO CHAPA crn' SECRETAR" I ti �► 1 ClouiICIL .. hiLla 5 doia City of Corpus Chnsci CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definitions. COMPANY NAME: Valero Refining -- Texas, L.P. P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: One Valero Way CITY: San Antonio FIRM. IS: 1. Corporation 4. Association 8 2. Partnership 5. Other ZIP: 78249 - 3. Sole Owner DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each `employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name None Job Title and City Department (if known) 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Title None 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Board, Commission or Committee None 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name Consultant None EXHIBIT "C" Page 1 of 2 FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Ethan Jones (Iy pc or Print l Signature of Certifying Person: Title: Assistant Secretary glI4Q-r4 Date: �%3 DEFINITIONS a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part- time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Finn." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." "Consultant." Any person or fine, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. g. EXHIBIT "C" Page 2 of 2 Amendment and Extension to the Agreement for Exclusive Reservation of Recycled Water Between Valero Refining -Texas, L.P. and City of Corpus Christi Whereas, on December 17, 2013, the City of Corpus Christi and Valero Refining -Texas, L.P. entered into an Agreement for Exclusive Reservation of Recycled Water ("the Reservation Agreement") with a term of nine months, with an option to extend the Reservation Agreement for an additional three-month period; Whereas, the Reservation Agreement provided for the City to reserve for the exclusive benefit of Valero the capacity for delivery of up to 4 million gallons per day ("mgd") of recycled water/treated wastewater effluent from the new Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant ("BWWTP") or from any other wastewater treatment plants in the event that the City will no longer be operating the BWWTP; Whereas, Valero desires to reserve up to 4 mgd of recycled water/treated wastewater effluent from the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant ("GWWTP") recycled water/treated wastewater effluent; Now, therefore, the parties agree to amend the Reservation Agreement and extend the term as follows (the "Amendment"); 1. The Reservation Agreement is amended so that the City agrees to reserve for the exclusive benefit of Valero up to 4 mgd of recycled water/treated wastewater effluent from the GWWTP. This amended Section I.A. replaces Section I.A. of the Reservation Agreement: 1. Reservation. A. Term and Fee. For and in consideration of payment of a reservation fee in the amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) to be paid within thirty days of the date the City Manager or the City Manager's designee signs this Amendment, the City will reserve for the exclusive benefit of Valero up to 4 million gallons per day ("mgd") of recycled water/treated wastewater effluent from the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant ("GWWTP"). During the term of the amended Reservation Agreement, the City shall not enter into any other agreement or reservation for treated wastewater effluent from the GWWTP. The Reservation as amended herein shall expire nine months from the Effective Date of this Amendment. The nine-month extended reservation period is to allow Valero and the City time for, including but not limited to evaluation, equipment pilot testing, pipeline right of way development, and project design. Before the expiration of this Amendment to the Reservation Agreement, Valero will inform the City in writing if it intends to enter into a recycled water agreement(s) for either or both of its local refineries dba the Valero Corpus Christi West Refinery and the Valero Corpus Christi East Refinery." Section I.D. of the Reservation Agreement is amended as follows: "D. Extension. Valero may extend this Amendment to the Reservation Agreement for an additional three-month period by providing the City with written notice at least thirty (30) days prior to the termination date of this Amendment along with an extension fee of Seventy -Five 1 Thousand Dollars ($75,000.00). During the three-month extended term of the reservation, the City shall not enter into any other agreement or reservation for treated wastewater effluent that would in any way restrict the City's ability to furnish Valero the 4.0 mgd of treated wastewater effluent subject to this Amendment." 2. This Amendment to the Reservation Agreement takes effect on December 16, 2014 (the "Effective Date"). 3. Within thirty days of the date the City Manager or the City Manager's designee signs this this Amendment to the Reservation Agreement Valero will pay the City One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00). 4. Any provision of the Reservation Agreement that is not expressly amended by this Amendment remains unchanged and in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year written below. VALERO: CITY: VALERO REFINING —TEXAS, L.P. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI By: By: 1. • A` Name: Dennis Payne Name: MaTi C Title: Senior Vice President & General Manager Title:LCf1{ G'T[.! M A.114Cre— Date: 1 �- I Date: J -/3o /41 ATTEST T? REBECCA HUERTA CITY SECRETARY 20 lr1AUI$u+«., +r cam. Y2- S i `ta CFCRFTAav Second Amendment and Extension to the Agreement for Exclusive Reservation of Recycled Water Between Valero Refining -Texas, L.P. and City of Corpus Christi Whereas, on December 17, 2013, the City of Corpus Christi and Valero Refining Texas, L.P. entered into an Agreement for Exclusive Reservation of Recycled Water ("the Reservation Agreement") with a term of nine months, with an option to extend the Reservation Agreement for an additional three-month period; Whereas, the Reservation Agreement provided for the City to reserve for the exclusive benefit of Valero the capacity for delivery of up to 4 million gallons per day ("mgd") of recycled water/treated wastewater effluent from the new Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant ("BWWTP") or from any other wastewater treatment plants in the event that the City will no longer be operating the BWWTP; Whereas, the Parties later determined that recycled water from the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant ("GWWTP") would be preferable; Whereas, the Parties entered into an Amendment and Extension to the Agreement for Exclusive Reservation of Recycled Water Between Valero Refining -Texas, L.P. and City of Corpus Christi on December 16, 2014 which reserved 4 mgd from the GWWTP for Valero, provided a term of nine months, and provided for one three-month extension after the nine-month term (the "Amendment"); Whereas, the Amendment will expire on December 16, 2015 and the Parties desire to further extend the Reservation Agreement; Now, therefore, the Parties agree to amend the Reservation Agreement and extend the term as follows (the "Second Amendment"); 1. The Reservation Agreement is amended so that the City agrees to reserve for the exclusive benefit of Valero up to 4 mgd of recycled water/treated wastewater effluent from the GWWTP. This amended Section I.A. replaces Section I.A. of the Reservation Agreement: "I. Reservation. A. Term. For and in consideration of payment of a reservation fee in the amount of Seventy -Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000.00) to be paid within thirty days of the date the City Manager or the City Manager's designee signs this Second Amendment, the City will reserve for the exclusive benefit of Valero up to 4 million gallons per day ("mgd") of recycled water/treated wastewater effluent from the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant ("GWWTP"). During the term of the amended Reservation Agreement, the City shall not enter into any other agreement or reservation for treated wastewater effluent from the GWWTP. The Reservation Agreement as amended herein shall expire twelve months from the Effective Date of this Second Amendment. The twelve-month extended reservation period is to allow Valero and the City time for, including but not limited to evaluation, equipment pilot testing, pipeline right of way development, project design, and project financing. Should the Parties need additional time to negotiate an agreement for the delivery of recycled wastewater, Valero may extend this Second Amendment 1 by an additional six months at no additional cost by providing written notice to the City thirty days prior to the expiration of this Second Amendment. Section I.D. of the Reservation Agreement is amended as follows: D. Extension. The Parties may extend the Reservation Agreement by mutual agreement. 2. This Amendment to the Reservation Agreement takes effect on December 16, 2015 (the "Effective Date"). 3. Any provision of the Reservation Agreement that is not expressly amended by this Amendment remains unchanged and in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Second Amendment as of the day and year written below. VALERO: VALERO REFINING —TEXAS, L.P. By: Name: Dennis Payne Title: Senior Vice Prresiddentt&& General Manager L Date: / / ( `� / �`J CITY: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI By: 62 Name: , E Title: t—Xt.,C n r4vP „��` t � ✓ Date: 2- fiI`I`ul", REBECCA HUERTA CITY SECREW1Y4 se to brow r LisaAguilar rU Assistant City Attorney For City Attorney a..(21a-:3112(11ti rfitlil{tILS.,G SECRETARS 2 Extension to the Agreement for Exclusive Reservation of Recycled Water Between Valero Refining -Texas, L.P. and City of Corpus Christi Whereas, on December 17, 2013, the City of Corpus Christi and Valero Refining -Texas, L.P. entered into an Agreement for Exclusive Reservation of Recycled Water ("the Reservation Agreement"), with a term of nine months, with an option to extend the Reservation Agreement for an additional three-month period; Whereas, the Reservation Agreement provided for the City to reserve for the exclusive benefit of Valero the capacity for delivery of up to 4 million gallons per day ("mgd") of recycled water/treated wastewater effluent from the new Broadway Wastewater Treatment Plant ("BWWTP") or from any other wastewater treatment plants in the event that the City will no longer be operating the BWWTP; Whereas, the Parties entered into an Amendment and Extension to the Reservation on December 16, 2014 which reserved 4 mgd from the Greenwood Wastewater Treatment Plant for Valero, provided a term of nine months, and provided for one three-month extension after the nine-month term; Whereas, the Parties entered into a Second Amendment and Extension to the Reservation Agreement on December 15, 2015, which will expire on June 16, 2017; Whereas, the Parties desire to further extend the Reservation Agreement for 60 days; Now, therefore, the Parties agree as follows: 1. The term of the Agreement for Exclusive Reservation of Recycled Water (the "Reservation Agreement") as previously amended and extended, is hereby extended for an additional 60 days, to expire on August 16, 2017. 2. This Extension to the Reservation Agreement takes effect on date of last signature. 3. All other terms and conditions of the Reservation Agreement, as previously amended and extended, remain unchanged and in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Extension as of the day and year written below. VALERO REFINING —TEXAS, L.P. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI By: Name: Richard J. Walsh Title: Senior Vice President Date: fl'1/11 / ZO R 4L. By: Name: Title: Date: 1 AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading for the City Council Meeting of June 13, 2017 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of June 20, 2017 DATE: April 27, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: E. Jay Ellington, Director, Parks and Recreation Department JayEll@cctexas.com 361-826-3460 Billish Park Agreement with the Padre Isles Property Owners Association CAPTION: Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an Agreement with the Padre Isles Property Owners Association ("PIPOA") for the Lease, Construction of Improvements and Operation of Billish Park located at 15601 Gypsy Street, to allow construction of park improvements, with City funding not to exceed $400,000 and PIPOA funding not to exceed $200,000, and providing for ongoing park maintenance by PIPOA. PURPOSE: Approve an agreement between the City and the PIPOA to execute construction of Billish Park Improvements and provide ongoing park maintenance once the construction is complete. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Bond 2012 includes funds to improve major investments and community parks. Billish Park was earmarked for $500,000 in improvements in the bond. The Parks and Recreation Department has worked with the PIPOA to develop plans for the improvements. However, along the way the project has hit various roadblocks (initial design consultant passed away, bids came in over budget, etc). Due to the lack of sufficient funds to cover the costs of all of the designed improvements for Billish Park, located at 15602 Gypsy Street on Padre Island, approved as part of the 2012 Bond program, an agreement has been reached with the PIPOA Inc. in which the PIPOA will assume responsibility for the design and construction of the Park improvements. The final design will be subject to approval by the Director of Parks and Recreation and the Director of Engineering Services. The Park will be leased to the POA for the period of construction with the POA paying the full costs of construction and being responsible to assure that all bills are paid. Upon completion of construction of the improvements according to the approved plans, the POA will deed the leasehold improvements to the City for an amount not to exceed $400,000, with an amount not to exceed $200,000 being paid by the POA, and the lease will terminate. In the event of any cost savings in the construction, the price will be reduced with two-thirds of the savings for the City and one-third for the POA. After the completion of construction, the POA has agreed to maintain the Park on a year- to-year basis for an annual fee of $14,700.00 which is the amount currently budgeted by Parks for Billish Park. The POA will be responsible for any additional costs. The parties can terminate that agreement at any time on one year's notice. The Agreement for the Lease, Construction of Improvements and Operation of Billish Park is attached. ALTERNATIVES: Do not approve the agreement and ask the Parks & Recreation Department to oversee limited project improvements. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Lease agreements must be approved by City Council. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Parks and Recreation, Legal, Finance FINANCIAL IMPACT: X Operating ❑ Revenue x Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016- 17 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered/ Expended Amount This item $400,000 $14,700 $414,700 BALANCE $400,000 $14,700 $414,700 Fund(s): Bond 2012 - $400,000; FY2018 (and future FY) $14,700 Comments: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the agreement. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Lease Agreement Ordinance Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an Agreement with the Padre Isles Property Owners Association ("PIPOA") for the Lease, Construction of Improvements and Operation of Billish Park located at 15601 Gypsy Street, to allow construction of park improvements, with City funding not to exceed $400,000 and PIPOA funding not to exceed $200,000, and providing for ongoing park maintenance by PIPOA Whereas, by election held on November 6, 2012, the City of Corpus Christi voters approved Proposition 4 regarding funding for City parks and recreation permanent public improvement projects; Whereas, the City identified up to $500,000 out of the 2012 bond funds for proposed improvements to the Billish Park; Whereas, the bond funding was not sufficient to complete the plans proposed for Billish Park improvements; Whereas, the Padre Isles Property Owners Association desires to provide funds up to $200,000 in conjunction with the City bond funds of up to $400,000 to complete the Billish Park improvements; Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas: SECTION 1. That the City Manager or designee is authorized to execute an Agreement with the Padre Isles Property Owners Association for the Lease, Construction of Improvements and Operation of Billish Park located at 15602 Gypsy Street, to allow for construction of park improvements, with City funding not to exceed $400,000 and PIPOA funding not to exceed $200,000, and providing for ongoing park maintenance by PIPOA. A copy of the Agreement is on file with the City Secretary. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Council Member That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Council Member PASSED AND APPROVED on this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Joe McComb Mayor AGREEMENT FOR THE LEASE, CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND OPERATION OF BILLISH PARK THIS AGREEMENT FOR THE LEASE, CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND OPERATION OF BILLISH PARK ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS, a home -rule municipal corporation ("City") and PADRE ISLES PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Texas nonprofit corporation ("P1 POA"). I. Term This Agreement shall commence on the effective date described herein and continue in its first phase until improvements are accepted by the City as provided herein and thereafter on a year- to-year basis until terminated as provided herein. In the event that the parties do not reach agreement on the final plans and specifications for the improvements to Billish Park (the "Billish Park Improvements") within four (4) months from date of last signature, this Agreement shall be subject to termination by either party on thirty (30) days' written notice. Upon the completion of the Billish Park Improvements and acceptance by the City, this Agreement shall continue in effect on a year-to-year basis consistent with the City's fiscal year subject to termination by either party by written notice at least three (3) months prior to the commencement of any City fiscal year. II. Protect Scope A. The City will provide the PIPOA with the plans and specifications for the Billish Park Improvements developed by the City's consultant, LMA Design, LLC. Billish Park is an approximately 11 acre park located at 15601 Gypsy, Corpus Christi Texas. The PIPOA reserves the right to work with its selected contractors to adjust the plans and specifications as needed to bring the cost of the Billish Park Improvements within the available budget. However, the PIPOA assumes any and all risks related to any adjustment to the plans and specifications developed by the City's consultant. In addition, the PIPOA recognizes that the City's consultant is not responsible to review nor approve any adjustments to the plans and specifications. All plans must be submitted to the City Director of Engineering and Director of Parks and Recreation and allow for at least 30 days for final review and approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably denied. B. The Billish Park Improvements must include: 1. Installation of new irrigation; and 2. Improvement to the turf and landscaping. C. The Billish Park Improvements may include: Pate 1 1. Excavation and grading of a pond, including placement of spoils throughout Billish Park in accordance with the plans and specifications; 2. Turf establishment on the pond slopes and embankments; 3. Suction pump at the pond for irrigation; 4. Concrete walkways adjacent to the pond; and/or 5. Playground equipment. D. Upon completion of the modifications to the plans and specifications for the Billish Park Improvements, the PIPOA shall submit the final terms of the construction contract and plans and specifications to the City Director of Parks and Recreation and the City Director of Engineering Services for review and approval, which approval shall be provided within thirty (30) days and which approval shall not be unreasonably denied. III. Construction of Imnrovements A. The PIPOA agrees to contract for the construction of the Billish Park Improvements as approved in the manner described above at its sole cost and expense. PIPOA shall ensure that the construction contract contains the insurance bond, and indemnification terms outlined on the attached Exhibits A and B. The PIPOA shall confirm with documentation to the City Director of Financial Services that it has sufficient funds to pay for the Billish Park Improvements prior to the commencement of any construction. B. Evidence of Contractor's insurance coverages in the amounts specified in Exhibit A and City building and construction permits shall be presented to the City Director of Engineering Services and City Director of Parks and Recreation prior to construction. C. The PIPOA agrees that all plans developed and all work performed shall be done in full compliance and in accordance with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations, including but not limited to the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines and such work shall be subject to City inspection during the performance thereof and after it is completed. The PIPOA shall ensure that its contractor maintains Billish Park in a clean, safe, and sanitary condition during the construction activities. The PIPOA shall develop a process to address and respond to any neighborhood complaints regarding the construction activities. D. The PIPOA shall discharge all obligations to contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, workmen and/or other persons for all work performed and for materials furnished for or on account of PIPOA as such obligations mature. The PIPOA expressly agrees that it will neither give nor grant, nor purport to give or grant any mechanic's or materialmen's lien upon the City's property or upon any Billish Park Improvements thereupon in the process of construction or repair, nor allow any condition to exist or situation to develop whereby any party should be entitled, as a matter of law, to a mechanic's or materialmen's lien against the City's property or Billish Park Improvements thereon, and the PIPOA will discharge any such lien within thirty (30) days after notice of filing thereof. Page 2 E. The PIPOA shall conduct its operations under this Agreement in an orderly and proper manner, considering the nature or such operation, so as not to unreasonably annoy, disturb or endanger others. F. During the term of construction, Billish Park shall be leased to the PIPOA and the PIPOA shall have exclusive possession of the property for the duration of the construction project, which in no event shall exceed one year from the date of commencement except with written approval of the City Manager. However, Billish Park shall remain open to the public except for portions closed due to construction. This Agreement shall constitute the lease of Billish Park for such purposes for the consideration provided herein. The commencement date of construction and the lease of Billish Park shall be deemed to occur upon the issuance of a building permit by the City for the Billish Park Improvements. G. The City shall not be liable to PIPOA nor its contractor for any delay damages. IV. Transferjif Billish Park Improvements to City and Payment A. Upon the completion of the Billish Park Improvements, the PIPOA shall execute a special warranty deed conveying such improvements to the City for the purchase price of $400,000 to be paid by the City (the "City Purchase Price"), which is subject to further reduction as provided below. B. The City Purchase Price for the Billish Park Improvements shall be reduced from $400,000 if the actual costs of construction incurred by the PIPOA (the "Actual Costs of Construction"), including the costs of one or more construction contractors, design consultants, construction managers, materials, bonds, insurance, permit fees and all other out-of-pocket expenses incurred directly for the completion of the Billish Park Improvements, are less than the sum of $600,000.00. If the Actual Costs of Construction are Tess than $600,000, the City Purchase Price to be paid by the City shall be reduced from $400,000 by 2/3 of the difference between $600,000 and the Actual Costs of Construction. An example is set out as follows: Maximum Costs of Construction: Actual Costs of Construction: Savings Accomplished: $600,000.00 $588.000.00 $12,000.00 Savings to City: 2/3 of $12,000 $8,000.00 City Purchase Price: $400,000.00 - $8,000.00 $392,000.00 C. Upon completion of the Billish Park Improvements, the PIPOA shall deliver to the City Director of Engineering Services and City Director of Parks and Recreation a cost report itemizing the expenses incurred including copies of the invoices for each expense. The City shall have thirty (30) days to inspect the Billish Park Improvements and review such costs and present any objections to the same. If the parties cannot resolve all Page 3 objections within thirty (30) days after the making of any objection, the City shall proceed to pay the full amount of the Purchase Price not in dispute, and the PIPOA shall deliver the special warranty deed and reserve its rights to seek its remedies at law for the collection of the remainder of the Purchase Price claimed by the PIPOA. D. Within sixty (60) days following completion fo the Billish Park Improvements, the PIPOA shall deliver the special warranty deed to the Billish Park Improvements in exchange for the payment of the Purchase Price determined in the manner provided above. The City may retain such deed in its records or file such deed of record with the Nueces County Clerk, at the City's option. Upon the delivery of such special warranty deed, the lease provided in Section IV above shall terminate. E. All warranties provided to the PIPOA regarding the Billish Park Improvements as part of the construction of same shall be transferred and assigned to the City together with the special warranty deed. F. Nothing herein shall obligate the PIPOA to expend more than a total of $600,000.00, with $200,000.00 being the maximum net cost to the PIPOA, for the construction of the Billish Park Improvements. V. Maintenance and Operation of Billish Park A. The PIPOA agrees to adopt, maintain, and repair Billish Park, including the Billish Park Improvements upon completion of construction of the Billish Park Improvements, on a year-to-year basis in accordance with terms and conditions described herein and subject to adjustment from time to time based on agreement between the P1POA and the City Manager or designee. B. The PIPOA agrees to maintain the multi-purpose sports field established at Billish Park according to the following standards: • Mow every 7 days during faster growing periods from March through October each year and every I4 days during the remainder of each year. • Aerate on an annual basis. • Fertilize on an annual basis. • Irrigate with an automated or manual irrigation system. • Apply pest control as needed. • Pick up litter and empty receptacles on a weekly basis or more frequently as needed. • Maintain alI remaining improvements on an as -needed basis. C. For the remainder of Billish Park, the maintenance schedule shall be the same except the mowing schedule may be reduced to approximately 21 times per year mowing every I4 days during months of March through October and every 28 days during the remainder of the year. Page 4 D. The City agrees to trim the palm trees at Billish Park at least one time per year. E. Each year, the City agrees to provide to the PIPOA $14,700.00 to defray a portion of the costs of mowing and maintaining the landscaping associated with Billish Park and the Billish Park Improvements, such amount to be paid on or before December 1 (or other mutually acceptable date) during each fiscal year subject to appropriation of funding and the City's annual budget process. The PIPOA shall be responsible for all other costs of mowing and maintenance of Billish Park. The City agrees to provide three months' notice of termination as provided in Section X11 below in the event that it elects not to appropriate such funds for the next fiscal year. F. If constructed, the PIPOA shall be solely responsible for the maintenance of the pond suction pump and related irrigation system in perpetuity until such system is removed or replaced. G. The PIPOA agrees to comply with the City's water conservation program. VI. jndemnificatio The PIPOA does hereby agree to indemnify and hold harmless the City and all of its officers, officials, agents, and employees, in both their public and private capacities, from any and all liability, claims, suits, demands, losses, damages, attorney's fees, including all expenses of litigation or settlement, or causes of action which may arise by out of or in connection with this Agreement, including injury to or death of any person or for loss of, damage to, or loss of use of any property, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement occasioned by error, omission or negligent act of the PIPOA, its officers, agents, employees, invitees or other person for whom it is legally liable with regard to the performance of this Agreement. VII. Signage During the period of construction, the PIPOA may erect a sign reflecting the investment of City Bond funds and the investment of the PIPOA's funds for the Billish Park Improvements, which sign shall be subject to approval by the City Director of Parks and Recreation, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Otherwise, during the term of this Agreement, the PIPOA may not place any signage at Billish Park except with prior written approval from the City Director of Parks and Recreation. VIII. Utilities If any utilities are required, needed or desired by the PIPOA during construction of the Billish Park Improvements, the PIPOA shall bear all costs, expenses and fees of extension connections or tapping charges for water and sanitary sewer facilities on the City's property, in accordance with the ordinances of the City, which expenses shall be includable as part of the Actual Costs of Construction provided above. Except for water used for irrigation purposes as provided below, PIPOA must pay for all utilities used by it or for any activity sponsored by PIPOA at Billish Park prior to the due date for payment. PIPOA must adhere to applicable water conservation Page 5 standards. In an effort to ensure that Billish Park is maintained in accordance with City standards, the City shall not charge PIPOA for water used by PIPOA to maintain and keep the Billish Park grounds in good condition. IX. Independent Contractor The PIPOA covenants and agrees that it is an independent contractor and not an officer, agent, servant or employee of City. In addition, the PIPOA covenants and agrees that the employees and volunteers of the PIPOA participating in the construction of the Billish Park Improvements, or participating in any other activity arising under or related to this Agreement, are solely employees and volunteers of the PIPOA and they are not employees or volunteers of the City nor are they under the control, supervision, or administration of the City. X. Assienment The PIPOA shall not assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City. XL Entire Agreement This Agreement embodies the complete agreement of the parties hereto regarding the Billish Park Improvements superseding all oral or written previous and contemporary agreements between the parties relating to matters herein and, except as otherwise provided herein, cannot be modified without written agreement of the parties. XII. Notices All notices or communications required under this Agreement or desired to be given by the parties hereto shall be sent in writing, and shall be deemed sufficiently given when same is hand delivered or deposited in the United States mail, sufficient postage prepaid, registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the recipient at the address set forth below: City of Corpus Christi Director of Parks and Recreation Post Office Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 361-826-3464 PIPOA 14015 Fortuna Bay Drive Corpus Christi, TX 78418 361-949-7025 XIII. Non -Waiver It is further agreed that one (1) or more instances of forbearance by City in the exercise of its rights herein shall in no way constitute a waiver thereof. Page 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement to be effective as of ,2017. City of Corpus Christi Padre Isles Property Owners Association, Inc. Margie C. Rose City Manager (Date) APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: Assistant City 'Forney (Date) RECOMMENDED: 00 IAL. j 11' .gton tor, Parks & Re 54/7 Brent Moore (Date) President � v i - Page 7 EXHIBIT A INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 1. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY INSURANCE A. Contractor must not commence work under this agreement until all insurance required has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Contractor must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. B. Contractor must furnish to the City's Risk Manager and Director of Parks and Recreation Department, 2 copies of Certificates of Insurance (COI) with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies, and a waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with COI. Project name and or number must be listed in Description Box of COI. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -written day notice of cancellation, required on all certificates or by applicable policy endorsements Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate Commercial General Liability including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non -Owned 3. Rented/Leased $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit WORKERS' COMPENSATION EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY Statutory $500,000 . $500,000 .:$500,000 C. in the event of accidents of any kind related to this Agreement, Contractor must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. Page 8 11. ADDITIONAL REOUIREMENTS A. Applicable for paid employees, Contractor must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers' compensation coverage provided must be in an amount sufficient to assure that all workers' compensation obligations incurred by the Contractor will be promptly met. B. Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Contractor's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. C. Contractor shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Contractor shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 D. Contractor agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • List the City and its officers, officials, employees, volunteers, and elected representatives as additional insured by endorsement, as respects operations, completed operation and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; • Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and • Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation, non -renewal or material change in coverage, and not Iess than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. E. Within five (5) calendar days of a suspension, cancellation, or non -renewal of coverage, Contractor shall provide a replacement Certificate of insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Contractor's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide Page 9 and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. F. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Contractor's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Contractor to stop work hereunder, andior withhold any payment(s) which become due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. G. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contractor's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this agreement. H. It is agreed that Contractor's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self-insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this agreement. 1. It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. Page j 10 EXHIBIT B Terms regarding construction of improvements at Billish Park The contractors who are awarded contracts for construction of the Billish Park Improvements shall furnish the following bonds by surety companies authorized to do business in Texas: 1. Payment Bond - A payment bond in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the contract for construction of the Improvements shall be furnished for the protection of all persons, firms and corporations who may furnish materials or perform labor. The payment bond shall be made with PIPOA as an Obligee. 2. Performance Bond - A performance bond in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the contract for construction of the Improvements shall be furnished covering the faithful performance of the contract. The performance bond shall be made with PIPOA as an Obligee. All construction agreements for the Improvements shall include the following provisions in large, bold fact font: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INDEMNIFY, DEFEND, AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND ALL OF ITS OFFICIALS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, CLAIMS, LOSSES, DAMAGES, SUITS, DEMANDS OR CAUSES OF ACTION INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION AND/OR SETTLEMENT, COURT COSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES WHICH MAY ARISE BY REASON OF INJURY TO OR DEATH OF ANY PERSON OR FOR LOSS OF, DAMAGE TO, OR LOSS OF USE OF ANY PROPERTY OCCASIONED BY ERROR, OMISSION, OR NEGLIGENT ACT OF CONTRACTOR, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES, SUBCONTRACTORS, INVITEES OR ANY OTHER PERSON, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT, AND CONTRACTOR SHALL AT HIS OR HER OWN COST AND EXPENSE DEFEND AND PROTECT THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI FROM ANY AND ALL SUCH CLAIMS AND DEMANDS. Page I 1 1 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1of1 Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are Interested parries. Complete Nos. 1, 2. 3, 5, and 6 ii there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number. 2017-209403 Date Filed: 05/17/2017 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Padre Isles Property Owners Association, Inc. Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. 111 Contract for Lease and Construction of Improvements to Btliish Park 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling 1 Intermediary Jones, Marvin Corpus Christi, TX United States X Tate, Carter Corpus Christi, TX United States X Tressa, Nancy Corpus Christi, TX United States X Shadow, John "Jack" Corpus Christi, TX United States X Scanlan, Darrell Corpus Christi, TX United States X Hess, Leslie Corpus Christi, TX United States X Moore, Brent Corpus Christi, TX United States X Wood, Boyldn & Wolter, PC Corpus Chrsiti, TX United States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. ❑ 6 AFFIDAVIT < < 4 AFFIX Sworn 20 1,44,.....—C, I swear, or affirm, under > ` penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure Is true and correct. �J AP.' VERONICA C SALAIS ,n, ID# 120141f- s v Notary Public STATE OF TEXAS -"' My Comm. Exp. 0906-2020 NOTARY STAMP 1 SEAL ABOVE to and subscribed before me, by the said 17 to certify which, witness my hand and I - , natwe John D. Bell of authorized agent of contracting business entity , this the day of May , seal of office. Veronica Salais Notary Public ,-,� Signature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Tide of officer administering oath provided icy Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.883 AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading Ordinance Item for the City Council Meeting of June 13, 2017 Second Reading Ordinance for the City Council Meeting of June 20, 2017 DATE: 05/10/2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager FROM: Julio Dimas, CFM, Interim Director, Development Services JulioD@cctexas.com (361) 826-3276 Approval of agreement and appropriating funds for developer for the construction of a water grid main extension line located at the southeast corner of Fred's Folly Drive and Yorktown Boulevard CAPTION: Ordinance authorizing City Manager or designee to execute a Water Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Construction and Reimbursement Agreement ("Agreement") with Oso Bend Development Company ("Developer"), for the construction of a water grid main extension line and appropriating $117,667.45 from the No. 4030 Water Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Trust Fund to reimburse the Developer in accordance with the Agreement. PURPOSE: Oso Bend Development Company is required to install 1,927 linear feet of a 12 -inch main extension water line in order to provide adequate water to a proposed residential subdivision development. The subdivision is located southeast of Yorktown Boulevard between Fred's Folly Drive and Starry Road. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Per UDC Section 8.5.1.C.1.B Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Extension and Reimbursement, Oso Bend Development Company is requesting a Reimbursement Agreement for the development of approximately 14.16 acres of land Situated in Lot 22 and 23, Section 25, Flour Bluff and Encina) Farm and Garden Tracts as shown on the final plat. The subdivision is located southeast of Yorktown Boulevard between Fred's Folly Drive and Starry Road. The development requires the extension of 1,927 linear feet of 12 -inch main extension water line in order to provide adequate water to the property. A layout of existing and proposed improvements is included as Exhibit 3. ALTERNATIVES: Disapproval of the Reimbursement Agreement. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The developer will be extending water to serve the proposed residential development and has requested a Reimbursement Agreement, in accordance with UDC Section 8.5.1.C.1.B Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Extension and Reimbursement. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal Finance FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ❑ Not Applicable X Other Fiscal Year: 2016-2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $2,462,650.87 Encumbered / Expended Amount $1,034,923.39 This item $117,667.45 BALANCE $1,310,060.03 Fund(s): Water Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Trust Fund 4030-21805-777-540450 Comments: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Ordinance with Agreement Location Maps Ordinance authorizing City Manager or designee to execute a Water Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Construction and Reimbursement Agreement ("Agreement") with Oso Bend Development Company ("Developer"), for the construction of a water grid main extension line and appropriating $117,667.45 from the No. 4030 Water Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Trust Fund to reimburse the Developer in accordance with the Agreement. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute a Water Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Construction and Reimbursement Agreement ("Agreement") with Oso Bend Development Company ("Developer"), for the extension of a 12 -inch main extension water line, including all related appurtenances, for the development of Lots 22 and 23, Section 25, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, known as Riverbend Subdivision Unit 1, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas. SECTION 2. Funding in the amount of $117,667.45 is appropriated from the No. 4030 Water Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Trust Fund to reimburse the Developer for the construction of a water grid main extension line improvements in accordance with the Agreement. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Council Member That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Council Member PASSED AND APPROVED on this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta Joe McComb City Secretary Mayor WATER ARTERIAL TRANSMISSION AND GRID MAIN CONSTRUCTION AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES § This Water Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Reimbursement Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into between the City of Corpus Christi ("City"), a Texas home - rule municipality, P.O. Box 9277, Corpus Christi, Texas, 78469-9277, and Oso Bend Development Company ("Developer"), 101 N. Shoreline Boulevard, Suite 600, Corpus Christi, Texas 78401. WHEREAS, the Developer, in compliance with the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), proposes to final plat the Property as shown on the attached final plat known as Riverbend Subdivision Unit 1 ("Development"), as shown in Exhibit 1 (attached and incorporated); WHEREAS, under the UDC and as a condition of such plat of Riverbend Subdivision Unit 1, Developer is required to construct a public waterline in order to record such plat; WHEREAS, Developer has submitted an application for reimbursement of the costs of extending a 12 -inch waterline from the existing 12 -inch waterline located at the southeast corner of Fred's Folly Drive and Yorktown Boulevard. The 12" PVC tie-in line will travel southeast along the south right-of-way of Yorktown Boulevard for 1,927 maximum linear feet and terminating with a 12" cap and 2" blow -off valve near the southeast corner of Ranch View Drive and consistent with the Unified Development Code (Exhibit 2); WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City to have the 12 -inch waterline on the south right-of-way of Yorktown Boulevard for a distance of 1,927 linear feet installed by Developer in conjunction with the final plat; WHEREAS, Resolution No. 026869 authorized the acceptance of applications to be eligible for reimbursement in the future when funds are fully available in, and are appropriated by City Council, the Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Line Trust Fund as per the UDC, Section 8.5.1.C(1), and WHEREAS, Chapter 212 of the Texas Local Government Code authorizes a municipality to make a contract with a Developer of a subdivision or land in the municipality to construct public improvements related to the subdivision or land; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration set forth hereinafter and in order to provide a coordinated waterline construction project, the City and Developer agree as follows: Subject to the terms of this Agreement and the plat of Riverbend Subdivision Unit 1, Developer will construct the 12 -inch waterline for and on behalf of the City in accordance with the plans and specifications as are approved by the City Engineer on behalf of the City. 1 REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION The Developer shall construct the 12 -inch waterline improvements, in compliance with the City's UDC and under the plans and specifications approved by the Development Services Engineer. 2. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS a. The Developer shall contract with a professional engineer, acceptable to the City's Development Services Engineer, to prepare plans and specifications for the construction of the 12 -inch waterline, as shown in Exhibit 3, with the following basic design: 1. Install one (1) 12" x 6" Ductile Iron Tee 2. Install 1,927 linear feet of 12" PVC C-900 3. Install four (4) 12" Gate Valve and Box 4. Install three (3) Fire Hydrants Assembly Complete In-place 5. Install one (1) 12" Cap w/ 2" Blow -off Valve 6. Install one (1) Tie in to Existing Waterline b. The plans and specifications must comply with City Water Distribution Standards and Standard Specifications. c. Before the Developer starts construction the plans and specification must be approved by the City's Development Services Engineer. 3. SITE IMPROVEMENTS Prior to the start of construction of the 12 -inch waterline improvements, Developer shall acquire and dedicate to the City the required additional utility easements "Easements", if necessary for the completion of the 12 -inch waterline. If any of the property needed for the Easements is owned by a third party and Developer is unable to acquire the Easements through reasonable efforts, then the City will use its powers of eminent domain to acquire the Easements. 4. PLATTING FEES Developer shall pay to the City of Corpus Christi the required acreage fees and pro -rata fees as required by the UDC for the area of the improvements for the construction of the 12 -inch waterline. The required acreage fees Developer is to pay to the City under the UDC for the 12 -inch waterline improvements will be credited to Developer provided that an application for credit, including cost - supporting documentation, has been submitted to the Assistant City Manager of Development Services prior to the installation of the 12 -inch waterline and is approved. Arterial Tran and Grid Main Reimb Agmt Riverbend Subdivision Unit 1 Standard Form Reimbursement Agreement Template Version 1.0 3.29.16 Page 2 of 10 5. DEVELOPER AWARD CONTRACT FOR IMPROVEMENTS Developer shall award a contract and complete the improvements to 12 -inch waterline, under the approved plans and specifications, by June 20, 2018. 6. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE Time is of the essence in the performance of this contract. 7 PROMPT AND GOOD FAITH ACTIONS The parties shall act promptly and in good faith in performing their duties or obligations under this Agreement. If this Agreement calls for review or inspections by the City, then the City's reviews or inspections must be completed thoroughly and promptly. 8. DEFAULT The following events shall constitute default: a. Developer fails to engage a professional engineer for the preparation of plans and specifications by the 10th calendar day after the date of approval by City Council. b. Developer's professional engineer fails to submit the plans and specifications to the City's Director of Engineering Services by the 40th calendar day after the date of approval by City Council. c. Developer fails to award a contract for the construction of the project, according to the approved plans and specifications, by the 70th calendar day after the date of approval by City Council. d. Developer's contractor does not reasonably pursue construction of the project under the approved plans and specifications. e. Developer's contractor fails to complete construction of the project, under the approved plans and specifications, on or before June 20, 2018. f. Either the City or Developer otherwise fails to comply with its duties and obligations under this Agreement. 9. NOTICE AND CURE a. In the event of a default by either party under this Agreement, the non - defaulting party shall deliver notice of the default, in writing, to the defaulting party stating, in detail the nature of the default and the requirements to cure such default. b. After delivery of the default notice, the defaulting party has 15 business days from the delivery of the default notice ("Cure Period") to cure the default. Arterial Tran and Grid Main Reimb Agmt Riverbend Subdivision Unit 1 Standard Form Reimbursement Agreement Template Version 1.0 3.29.16 Page 3 of 10 c. In the event the default is not cured by the defaulting party within the Cure Period, then the non -defaulting party may pursue its remedies in this section. Should Developer fail to perform any obligation or duty of this Agreement, the City shall give notice to Developer, at the address stated above, of the need to perform the obligation or duty, and should Developer fail to perform the required obligation or duty within 15 days of receipt of the notice, the City may perform the obligation or duty, charging the cost of such performance to Developer by reducing the reimbursement amount due Developer. e. In the event of an uncured default by the Developer, after the appropriate notice and cure period, the City has all its common law remedies and the City may: 1. Terminate this Agreement after the required notice and opportunity to cure the default. 2. Refuse to record a related plat or issue any certificate of occupancy for any structure to be served by the project. 3. Perform any obligation or duty of the Developer under this agreement and charge the cost of such performance to Developer. Developer shall pay to City the reasonable and necessary cost of the performance within 30 days from the date Developer receives notice of the cost of performance. In the event that Developer pays the City under the preceding sentence, and is not otherwise in default under this Agreement, then the Agreement shall be considered in effect and no longer in default. f. In the event of an uncured default by the City after the appropriate notice and cure period, the Developer has all its remedies at law or equity for such default. 10. FORCE MAJEURE a. The term "force majeure" as employed in this Agreement means and refers to acts of God; strikes, lockouts, or other industrial disturbances; acts of public enemies; insurrections; riots; epidemic; landslides; lightning; earthquakes; fires; hurricanes; storms; floods; washouts; droughts; arrests; civil disturbances; explosions; or other causes not reasonably within the control of the party claiming the inability. b. If, by reason of force majeure, either party is rendered wholly or partially unable to carry out its obligations under this Agreement, then the party shall give written notice of the full particulars of the force majeure to the other party within ten (10) business days after the occurrence or waive the right to claim it as a justifiable reason for delay. The obligations of the party giving the required notice, to the extent affected by the force Arterial Tran and Grid Main Reimb Agmt Riverbend Subdivision Unit 1 Standard Form Reimbursement Agreement Template Version 1.0 3.29.16 Page 4 of 10 majeure, are suspended during the continuance of the inability claimed, but for no longer period, and the party shall endeavor to remove or overcome such inability with all reasonable dispatch. 11. NOTICES a. Any notice or other communication required or permitted to be given under this Agreement must be given to the other Party in writing at the following address: 1. If to the Developer: Oso Bend Development Company Attn: John W. Wallace 101 N. Shoreline Blvd. Suite 600 Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 2. If to the City: City of Corpus Christi 1201 Leopard Street (78401) P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469 ATTN: Assistant City Manager Development Services b. Notice required by the paragraph may be by United States Postal Service, First Class Mail, Certified, Return Receipt Requested, postage prepaid; by a commercial delivery service that provides proof of delivery, delivery prepaid; or by personal delivery. c. Either party may change of address for notices by giving notice of the change under the provisions of this section. 12. THIRD -PARTY BENEFICIARY Developer's contracts with the professional engineer for the preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of the project, contracts for testing services, and with the contractor for the construction of the project must provide that the City is a third party beneficiary of each contract. 13. PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS Developer shall require its contractor for the construction of the project, before beginning the work, to execute with Developer and the City a performance bond if the contract is in excess of $100,000 and a payment bond if the contract is in excess of $25,000. The performance and payment bond must comply with Texas Government Code, Chapter 2253 and must be in the form and substance as attached to this Agreement. 14. WARRANTY Developer shall fully warranty the workmanship of and function of the 12 -inch waterline improvements and the construction thereof for a period of one year from and after the date of acceptance of the facilities by the City Engineer. Arterial Tran and Grid Main Reimb Agmt Riverbend Subdivision Unit 1 Standard Form Reimbursement Agreement Template Version 1.0 3.29.16 Page 5 of 10 15. REIMBURSEMENT a. Subject to the appropriation of funds, the City will reimburse the Developer 100% of the reasonable cost of the 12 -inch waterline improvements, not to exceed $131,317.45 ($117,667.45 waterline reimbursement and $13,650.00 water distribution system acreage fee). See attached cost estimate (Exhibit 4). b. Subject to the appropriation of funds, the City agrees to reimburse the Developer on a monthly basis upon invoicing for work performed. The reimbursement will be made no later than 30 -days from the date of the invoice. Developer shall submit all required performance bonds and proof of required insurance under the provisions of this Agreement as detailed in Exhibit 5. c. To be eligible for reimbursement, the work completed in a good and workmanlike manner, and must have been inspected and accepted by the City. The City agrees to conduct periodic inspections and approve the progress of the work at key points during construction. d. In the event that this Agreement is terminated by the City at a time when there has been a partial completion and partial payment for the improvements, then the City shall only reimburse Developer for its costs that were legitimately incurred towards the completion of the improvements that have been inspected and accepted by the City up to the time that there is an uncured default by the Developer. 16. INDEMNIFICATION DEVELOPER, COVENANTS TO FULLY INDEMNIFY, SAVE AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS, ("INDEMNITEES") AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS SUITS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER ASSERTED AGAINST OR RECOVERED FROM CITY ON ACCOUNT OF INJURY OR DAMAGE TO PERSON INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION ON THE FOREGOING, WORKERS COMPENSATION AND DEATH CLAIMS, OR PROPERTY LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY OTHER KIND WHATSOEVER, TO THE EXTENT ANY INJURY, DAMAGE, OR LOSS MAY BE INCIDENT TO, ARISE OUT OF, BE CAUSED BY, OR BE IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH, EITHER PROXIMATELY OR REMOTELY, WHOLLY OR IN PART, THE DEVELOPER'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT OR TO PROVIDE CITY WATER SERVICE TO THE DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING INJURY, LOSS, OR DAMAGE WHICH ARISE OUT OF OR ARE IN ANY MANNER CONNECTED WITH, OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE OUT OF OR BE IN ANY MANNER CONNECTED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, EXISTENCE, OPERATION, USE, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, RESTORATION, OR REMOVAL OF THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT DESCRIBED ABOVE, INCLUDING Arterial Tran and Grid Main Reimb Agmt Riverbend Subdivision Unit 1 Standard Form Reimbursement Agreement Template Version 1.0 3.29.16 Page 6 of 10 THE INJURY, LOSS OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE SOLE OR CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF THE INDEMNITEES OR ANY OF THEM, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE INJURY, DAMAGE, LOSS, VIOLATION, EXERCISE OF RIGHTS, ACT, OR OMISSION IS CAUSED OR IS CLAIMED TO BE CAUSED BY THE CONTRIBUTING OR CONCURRENT NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES, OR ANY OF THEM, BUT NOT IF CAUSED BY THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF INDEMNITEES, OR ANY OF THEM, UNMIXED WITH THE FAULT OF ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY, AND INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, AND ATTORNEYS FEES, WHICH ARISE, OR ARE CLAIMED TO ARISE, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE ASSERTED OR RECOVERED INCIDENT. THIS INDEMNITY SPECIFICALLY INCLUDES ALL CLAIMS, DAMAGES, AND LIABILITIES OF WHATEVER NATURE, FORESEEN OR UNFORESEEN, UNDER ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LAWS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: (A) ALL FEES INCURRED IN DEFENDING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING BROUGHT BY A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ENTITY AND ARISING FROM THE PRESENCE, CONTAINMENT, USE, MANUFACTURE, HANDLING, CREATING, STORAGE, TREATMENT, DISCHARGE, RELEASE OR BURIAL ON THE PROPERTY OR THE TRANSPORTATION TO OR FROM THE PROPERTY OF ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE. THE FEES FOR WHICH THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE UNDER THIS SUBPARAGRAPH SHALL INCLUDE BUT SHALL NOT BE LIMITED TO THE FEES CHARGED BY (I) ATTORNEYS, (II) ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, (III) ENGINEERS, (IV) SURVEYORS, AND (V) EXPERT WITNESSES. (B) ANY COSTS INCURRED ATTRIBUTABLE TO (I) THE BREACH OF ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION MADE BY DEVELOPER/OWNER IN THIS AGREEMENT, OR (II) ANY CLEANUP, DETOXIFICATION, REMEDIATION, OR OTHER TYPE OF RESPONSE ACTION TAKEN WITH RESPECT TO ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE ON OR UNDER THE PROPERTY REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR NOT THAT ACTION WAS MANDATED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. THIS INDEMNITY SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THE AGREEMENT. 17. ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT This Agreement may be assigned by Developer to another with the written consent of the City's City Manager. 18. COVENANT RUNNING WITH THE LAND This Agreement is a covenant running with the land, Parkview Unit 2, a subdivision in Nueces County, Texas, and must be recorded in the Official Public Records of Nueces County, Texas. The duties, rights, and obligations of the Arterial Tran and Grid Main Reimb Agmt Riverbend Subdivision Unit 1 Standard Form Reimbursement Agreement Template Version 1.0 3.29.16 Page 7 of 10 Agreement are binding on and inure to the benefit of the Developer's successors or assigns. 19. DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP INTERESTS Developer further agrees, in compliance with the City Ordinance No. 17110, to complete, as part of this Agreement, the Disclosure of Ownership interests form attached hereto as Exhibit 6. 20. AUTHORITY All signatories signing this Agreement warrant and guarantee that they have the authority to act on behalf of the entity represented and make this Agreement binding and enforceable by their signature. 21. EFFECTIVE DATE This Agreement shall be executed in one original, which shall be considered one instrument. *This Agreement becomes effective and is binding upon, and inures to the benefit of the City and Developer from and after the date that all original copies have been executed by all signatories. EXECUTED IN ONE original, *this day of , 2017. SIGNATURES FOUND ON PAGES 9 and 10. Arterial Tran and Grid Main Reimb Agmt Riverbend Subdivision Unit 1 Standard Form Reimbursement Agreement Template Version 1.0 3.29.16 Page 8 of 10 Developer: Oso Bend Development Company Attn: John W. Wallace 101 N. Shoreline Blvd. Suite 600 Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 By: John W. Wallace, Vice -President THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES § This instrument was signed by John W. Wallace, Vice -President Oso Bend Development Company, and acknowledged before me on the day of , 2017. Notary Public, State of Texas Arterial Tran and Grid Main Reimb Agmt Riverbend Subdivision Unit 1 Standard Form Reimbursement Agreement Template Version 1.0 3.29.16 Page 9 of 10 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI: ATTEST: By: By: Rebecca Huerta Julio Dimas City Secretary Development Services Interim Director THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES § This instrument was signed by Rebecca Huerta, City Secretary, for the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, and acknowledged before me on the day of 2017. Notary Public, State Of Texas THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES § This instrument was signed by Julio Dimas, CFM, Development Services Interim Director, for the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, and acknowledged before me on the day of , 2017. Notary Public, State Of Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM: This day of , 2017. Assistant City Attorney For the City Attorney Arterial Tran and Grid Main Reimb Agmt Riverbend Subdivision Unit 1 Standard Form Reimbursement Agreement Template Version 1.0 3.29.16 Page 10 of 10 1.) Total platted area contains 14.16 Acres of Land. (Includes Street Dedication) 2.) The receiving water for the storm water runoff from this property is the Oso Creek. The TCEQ has not classified the aquatic life use for the Oso Creek, but it is recognized as an environmentally sensitive area. The Oso Creek Flows directly into the Oso Boy. TheTCEO has classified the aquatic life use for the Oso Bay a"exceptional" and "oyster waters` and categorized the receiving water as contact recreation" use. 3.)Bearings based on CPS, NAD83, State Plane Coordinate System. Texas South Zone 4205. 4.) By graphic plotting only, this property is in Zone '6' on Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 485494 0540 C, Nueces County, Texas, which bears a revised date of March 18, 1985 and is not in a Special Flood Hazard Area. 5.)The yard requirem^nt' depicted is regoireement of the Onified Development Code d 's subject to hange as the ning m0y change. 6.)Residential driveways are prohibited direct access to Yorktown Boulevard from Lots 1 through 16, Block 1; and Lot 13, Block 2. 7.) Residential driveways are e prohibited direct ac cess to Ranch Yew Drive from Lot 1, Block 1, Lots 1and 28. Block 6 andLot 1, Block 7. 8.) All temporary drainage easements shall be maintained by the Home Owners Association (HOA). 9.)Lot 1A, Block 1 and Lot 13A, Block 2 ore landscape Tots to be maintained by the Home Owners Association. State of Texas County of Nueces Patricia H. Wallace, Trustee y2, hereby certifies that she is the owner of the lands embraced within the boundaries of Me foregoing plat; that she has had said lands surveyed and subdivided as shown: that streets shown arededicated to the public use forever; that easements as shown are dedicated to the public use for the Installation, operation and use of public ulilitlnS; and that th4 mop was made for the purpose of description and dedication. This Me day of By 001040 H. Wallace, Trustee #2 State of Texas County of Nueces 20 - This instrument was acknowledged before me by Patricia H. Wallace. Trustee #2. This the day of 20 - Notary Public in and for the state of Texas OCT 1 9 2016 =l PLANNING COMMISSION Plat of Riverbend Subdivision Unit 1 a 14.16 Acre Tract of Land out of Lots 22 and 23, Section 25, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, a map of which is recorded in Volume A, Pages 41-43, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas; said 14.16 Acres being out of a 60.073 acre tract of land described Warranty Deed from John Wollace, Trustee to Patricia H. Wallace, Trustee #2, recorded in Document No. 2005007409, Official Public Records of Nueces County, Texas. Site A Location Map: N.T.S. State of Texas County of Nueces This final plat of the herein described property was approved by the Department of Development Services of the City of Corpus Christi. Texas. This 0106 day of 20 Ratner Pottumuthu, P.E., L009 40 Development Services Engineer State of Texas County of Nueces Ibis anal plot of the herein described property was approved on behalf of the City of Corpus Ciwls0, Texas by Me Planning Commission. This the day of 20 Daniel McGinn, AI.0.0. Philip J. Ramirez, ALA.. LEED AP. Chairman Interim Secretary State of Texas County of Nueces I. Kara Sands, perk of the County Court in and for said County. do hereby certify that the foregoing instrument doted me _ day of 20 with Its certificate of authentication was filed for record in my office the _ day of 20 At O'clock _M and duly recorded the - day of 20- at _ O'clock _M., In said County in Volume . Page Map Records. Witness my hand and seal of the County Court, in and for said County, at office In Corpus Christi, Texas, the day and year last written. No Fled for Record Kara S000s. County 00110 Nueces Cnnty, Texm at O'clock -JA 20 BY Deputy State of Texas County of Nueces James D. Carr, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor far Urban Engineering. have prepared the foregoing map tom arvey made on Me ground under y direction and is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. information and belief: I have been engaged under contract to set 011 Lot and Block corners ashown herein and to complete such operations with due and reasonable diligence consistent with sound professional practice. This Me _ day of 20 James D. Carr. R.P.LS. Texas License No. 6458 U F! B A Ni DATE: Beet. 7, 2016 SCALE: 1 =100' ENGINEERING JOB NO.: 39595.85.03 SHEET: 1 of 2 DRAWN BY: 04 EXHIBIT 1 1 of 2 LINE 11'241229' eel naw CURVE C2 Ce CO C9 C10 C11 015rANCg 100.00 90,00 00 nI ARC LENGTH 90'00'00" 90'00'00' 90'00'00' 23.56 zo ooh 0210,M" 00000 IFNGT11 15.00 .041211 148'040.2' 90'00'00" 90100.00.1 25.00 25.00' 6.25 S16117 311E 21.21 291E 51617311E 2.29, H14140 15, 20.00 N73142129.E N1617 31^11 .13' .80' 12.13 21.21 OCT 1 9 2016 PLANNING COMMISSION 150 100 50 0 100 200 Graphic Scale 1"=100' 0 5/8 Inch Iron Rod Found a 5/9 Inc mn 550 w60 'ul:eeN�6r'+Gre cclx� Fo9na SIe F5500*115 VR6PN ENGR 0010' Set 0 Mac Nail h washer tamped URBAN MGR CCT% SM Plat of Riverbend Subdivision Unit 1 a 14.16 Acre Tract of Land out of Lots 22 and 23, Section 25, Flour Bluff and Encino) Farm and Garden Tracts, a mop of which is recorded In Volume A, Pages 41-43, Mop Records of Nueces County, Texas; said 14.16 Acres being out of a 60.073 acre tract of land described Warranty Deed from John Wallace, Trustee to Patricia H. Wallace, Trustee #2, recorded in Document No. 2005007409, Official Public Records of Nueces County, Texas. URBANDATE: Sett. 7, 2016 SCALE: 1 =100 ENGINEERING JOB NO.: 39595.95.03 ,a °6,„m'+,„ SHEET: 2 of 2 p DRAWN 6Y: XG 1,139515113503111395358518.,/, 9/17¢0161156 an EXHIBIT 1 2 of 2 APPLICATION FOR WATERLINE REIMBURSEMENT We, Oso Bend Development Company, 101 N. Shoreline, Suite 600, Corpus Christi, TX 78401, Developers of proposed Riverbend Subdivision Unit 1, hereby request reimbursement of $117,667.45 for the installation of the grid main water line, 12" C-900 PVC, in conjunction with said lot, as provided for by City Ordinance No. 17092. $117,667.45 is the construction cost, including 11.5% Engineering, testing and Surveying, less the lot/acreage fee, as shown by the cost supporting documents attached herewith. J ► n W. Wallace, Vice -President Date so Bend Development Company THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES § This instrument was acknowledged before me on 2017, by John W. Wallace, Vice -President, of Oso Bend Development Company, a Texas Corporation, on behalf of the said corporation. 0 ryP b • lic in and r the State of Texas XAVIER GALVAN Notary ID # 125186163 My Commission Expires February 1, 2021 CERTIFICATION The information submitted with this application for reimbursement has been reviewed and determined to be correct. Reimbursement is subject to: (a) Sufficiency of funds in the Arterial Grid Main Trust Fund, and (b) Appropriation and approval by the City Council. LI Development Services Engineer EXHIBIT 2 (Date) 1 of 2 APPLICATION FOR WATERLINE CREDIT We, Oso Bend Development Company, 101 N. Shoreline, Suite 600, Corpus Christi, Texas 78401, Developers of proposed Riverbend Subdivision Unit 1, hereby apply for $13,650.00 credit towards the water lot/acreage fee for the installation of the grid main water line, 12" C-900 PVC, as provided for by City Ordinance No. 17092. $131,317.45 is the construction cost, including 1 1.5% Engineering, testing and Surveying, as shown by the cost supporting documents attached herewith. -\- J . n W. Wallace, Vice -President Date so Bend Development Company THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES § This instrument was acknowledged before me on ;" Vi 2017, by John W. Wallace, Vice -President, of Oso Bend Development Company, a Texas Corporation, on behalf of the said corporates XAVIER GALVAN Notary ID 1125186163 My commission Expires February 1. 2021 Nota Public in an 4 for the State of Texas EXHIBIT 2 2 of 2 CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR PAVING, WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ME FOLLOWING sTRIW9 SHEETS SPECIfYOILY IDENTIFIED BETON WE BEN SELECTED BY NE OR OMER NY RESPONSIBLE SWENSION AS BENG APR.. M MIS PROJECT. P.E 11/18/2016 RIVER BEND RANCH - PHASE 1 CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS CITY STANDARDS CITY OF C.C. STANDARD WATER DETAILS 1 OF 5 CITY OF C.C. STANDARD WATER DETAILS 2 OF 5 CITY OF C.C. STANDARD WATER DETAILS 3 OF 5 CITY OF C.C. STANDARD WATER DETAILS 4 OF 5 CITY OF C.C. STANDARD WATER DETAILS 5 OF 5 CITY OF C.C. STANDARD SANITARY SEWER DETAILS 1 OF 5 CITY OF C.C. STANDARD SANITARY SEWER DETAILS 2 OF 5 CITY OF C.C. STANDARD SANITARY SEWER DETAILS 3 OF 5 CITY OF C.C. STANDARD SANITARY SEWER DETAILS 4 OF 5 CITY OF C.C. STANDARD SANITARY SEWER DETAILS 5 OF 5 CITY OF C.C. STANDARD STORM SEWER DETAILS 1 OF 2 CITY OF C.C. STANDARD STORM SEWER DETAILS 2 OF 2 CITY OF C.C. STANDARD DRIVEWAY DETAILS 1 OF 2 CITY OF C.C. STANDARD DRIVEWAY DETAILS 2 OF 2 CITY OF C.C. STANDARD CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK DETAILS 1 OF 1 LOCATION MAP N.T.S. 7191E CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR NORFYING THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRIS11 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION DEPARTMENT (826-1738) AT LEAST THREE WORKING DAYS IN ADVANCE OF BEGINNING ANY WORK ON PUBUC IMPROVEMENTS. PUBUC IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE WATER, SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND STREET OR DRIVEWAY WORK ON OR TIEING INTO PUBUC FACILITIES. EXHIBIT 3 1 of25 Sheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title 1 COVER PAGE AND SHEET INDEX 2 LEGEND AND GENERAL NOTES 3 PAVING AND GRADING PLAN SHEET 1 4 WATER LAYOUT 5 OFFSITE WATER LAYOUT 6 SANITARY SEWER LAYOUT 7 OFFSITE SANITARY SEVER PLAN 8 SANITARY SEVER PROFILES SHEET 1 9 SANITARY SEWER PROFILES SHEET 2 10 SANITARY SEVER PROFILE SHEET 3 11 SANITARY SEVER PROFILES SHEET 4 12 STORM LAYOUT 13 STORM SEWER PROFILES SHEET 1 14 STORM PROFILES SHEET 2 15 OFFSITE DITCH LAYOUT SHEET 1 16 OFFSITE DITCH LAYOUT SHEET 2 17 DRAINAGE PLAN 18 POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN 19 OFF—SITE POLLUTION PREVEN110N PLAN 20 PAVING DETAILS 21 SIGN AND DRIVEWAY DETAILS 22 DIRT SPREAD MAP ENGINEER: N.NsO .01 MURRY F. HUDSON, P.E. C ENGINEERING CORPUS CHRIST, TEXAS J 4. �l:=11'' 111;10-.,,, JOB NO. 39595.85.00 DATE:NOVEMBER 2016 erne URBAN 1 1 22 £ 1IHIHX1 k. hg ] � ,.,....;;.,.. §l§;|| g ;■|!!||■||�|||§� IRO |lf;|f§| || I§. 1§|,0 ■|; ,...,,I r,,,a,,,,\!_,,,:,:: !■|■■•;El ..� �| | |;; 2'1"1R111.1.11 |I. g. k"4g LEURBAN ENGINEERING LEGEND & GENERAL NOTES RIVERBEW SUMMON INT CORPUS CHRISTI. TEX. DRAM: AGR DES MEDI DESCRRIOA 1 * 5 2 2 P 2 i : 5 otlo o I I ! S6111731”E 1040.00' cb k Ai& _ ; I .; 3 1 , r"Mffffilii---"Nalle.....,' 1 IM wisp . 1 w,.. ArF E (Doc No EXHIBIT 3,, : il • .?:6.trvi sY/ 9 Y./ =AI\ Erli7 I= • rral .11•31' R/UE 15 16 1 18 1 22 24 _._ 10YR /UE 14 3 2q /1L 11 I 7 —1i II e 1 I ..: .., 13 9 6 ij 1 1 g - < 2 r % 57 N . 5' litli SA .i0 Yorktown Boulevard m=rvn „ 5 • 1 25 `T_ 6 7 28 5(154/.0 E - --------- ., 4 1 1 e 151'72U -- Al Ali b 5 01J4.... ' . . _ ,1 1 1 i I E I I i .1. •I 1 11,0;1 a . nch View D '..,_ T -.- , I I I I I 1 1 I ;I .. 5U E 40 C No 52, : - 0 P le : 5 i i - i, 7-' ' ' 4 A • q 40 00 e w, I I ' I r I 0 e . Ii URBAN ENGINEERING .• PAVING AND GRADNG PLAN 4. u ., DRAWN v 1. DA1E DES EDI f MENEM SUNINISPN INT 1 CORPUS CHRISTI TEX. 'ETEAVE''''Ox:67' I,E70,11.,01". ' DATE: OCT 2016 N284229•E 574.24 1 . I I 1. IL-' s L E E Pi iri Ei; , - c , 2. E. : A'z' * 1 c F • .. AMMI NI .rm _ ,_,__ cilo,'F;iRs/u,,, 1. 10 YR1'/U E 1 14 1 14 . ..1 %- 0 1 t 1 1 13 s 1 16 —1 13 1 ' 13 12 1 1 1 1 17 1 12 1 1 12 ° 11 1 10 1 1 1 1 18 1 19 1 11 0 10 1 1 11 10 8 1 21 8 8 6 '81 1 t 22 1 t 23 7 V' t 1 6 t 5', , 1 .II' ,J I 6 5 1 IiH 1 ' 1 24 1 25 5 1 III !It , 1 1 I * 1 \ 1 00 31 1 1 1 1 1 1 11t1 "8 26 1 lg. 1 1 272 ','1 ':',3 3 2 1 1 ' 3 1 10 ....., s',•• 1 ' ,-'''. 7 E.1 .... 1Doc No . onch View Drive i'' - ' 1 .r.r..-acaamMt•l!lea!MI m1 • , 1 II k„ --9 , 4. 4 „ sur 1 442DYP 1 011 , E E s s 1 I • D. 828°42.29W ••••• DD li N 5 U E (,co cco N c ,_,?) : r. 1 1 4 , I 1 1 r IA , z o 1 iiURBAN ENGINEERING ' WATER UTILITY LAYOUT CIIIIi•Ir.4.:',1) ii• RIVERBEIC SUBDIVISION UNfr 1 CORPUS CHRISTI. TEXAS iFF"AiFiari' ,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, DA E OC 20 6 .! # ` ^ w1I / [E I • _• ^ # -(0}-- g _ 1 \ { > \ -, PROP SCA ) � = --� . _\ E\� ƒ k \ 00\ ,11 \ NEENNENENNNXEEENNE A -A TYPICAL STREET SECTION C . / ,_.. �I , {. 2 r .1 \L� § \ (LOOKING WEST) EXHIBIT 3 ------ - - §- e -I- 1 4 ! I - - ` . : \ \\ I} \\ / { I \ a , ^ \\ \ 1 ^ t s - -\ , -- _ M / l \:/° 5� \ ( .J \ III . #A • --- i Q � \ \�� • USN* ENGINEERING OFFSITEWATERLAYOUT ' ° z ©`_ , _ SIGNE __ __N ENE EH Q ., ..„ N28'42'29"E 574.24' liTe 4,, \ 4,,. \ Ll I I I I i I i icul i L .8.4.8. !*/ ,,.. L-.' • '41""' 'I , '''I ..'4I 'I Eq.-- ''''' ''' , —.4 —, 20 Y R_, 1 _, yg2,, ii • II ' 1 O•II 111 si I II I 1 1 I 1 '1 1 Re. Cloud Drive 5; A EXHIBIT 3 4 U Eff'l i_ ffi,r 14 I 1 13 A _ .m '''- 1 12 ill i ' 17 12 ill ' 12 IJI. a' 11 111 18 11 6 11 11 ' , , JI1 1 HI , ' 20 9 , 1111 9 1 80 I HI 1=21 8 t ' 11111 ... 8 0 . !111 22 I '' 7 '' Ill ,, 7 , 1 -! IHi ,‘„, 6 8, 1 i , 23 _...,_ 6 1111 '' . 1 , 4 I 5 I , , ,-, ' 24 I 5 ilin, I i t j I !, 1 ifli nit! , 25 '. 4- , 4 1111 .. 1 , , m ,_, , 26 I 3 NIN, 1111 -- 2 — -11I EII 1 - --- 27 2 I 1 I 1 28 1 11111 , LI .1 10 Y IR /U E I MI —r1-3 iii 10',./U j_., Ill Li - fl• . D 1 Doc No Ranch View Drive 1 8 IJPSNUI), '-i. ii • - 1 i , 5VIR . -P i 4 i ;i 00I I 5, Ii ' I S28742.2ilnif q9n ar (17•% p•I•1;,N clh ..,. , , I , I ' Eg 4%Ii I s URBAN ENGINEERING SANITARY SEWER UTIUTY LAYOUT • 1,, OR•m• GR v WE ' "C" Zio' DES EDI f RIVEREIEW SUERINISPN CORPUS CHRISTI. TEX. iNdi,FESIE ,,,,,min,ar, DATE. OCT .16 ^ ` ` ` ` `` PAP�� � MI 11 RI AM ' ' ,_ , R.4ER 11 E62 u�~� �`���swa/wssn/waMERMEN:1 , ` ��� URBAN on�ns*m�x�oowmmnRvuwom ����� ��� DRAWN: = ^DA1E DE MR DB EDI ' SUMMON , EC ED ' £ IICIIHX1 I 1422; I I I I 11+00 12,00 13+00 7 i 1 . " , i ra:'4,14 p ... lol at i Pi _p-CEQ AND CITY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATION TO BE MET 8 t N E > 1 g II • • S I r 51111:11t• 111 I 8 Ca C Fol In I 1 ; • 1 T • 8 8 Lithtunea_ 8 rE,- &' L. 1 6 EP 1 s / 1 :28 i 1 5 _ 6 ; * '.! 0 rzn k' 0 0 e Z URBAN' , 1 ej Mi ENGINEERING SANITARY SEWER PROFILE LINE A ,, DES MEDI f RIVERBEW MEMNON CORPUS CHRISTI TEX. C EC ED f iAt'isliP444.E:g7' ,,,,,:z von.,a r , DATE OCT .16 £ 1ICIIHX1 m m N a s 0 0 Z m 8 a 1114 140 251. einn 1 i V TCEQ AND CITY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATION TO BE MET kco I I E URBAN l� ENGINEERING VelFESIE SANITARY SEWER PROFILE LIES AAND B NVERBEW SUMMON INRt CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXA DRAWN: AGR YIEv.6� 2 DES GREW DESCRWTON C EC ED DATE: OCT. 3016 -7 8 8 8 2 0 6-1 ; 6-1 TCEQ AND CITY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATION TO BE MET z g 8 k°4 I URBAN ENGINEERING SANITARY SEWER PROFILE LIES C AID D MERMEN:1 SUMMON MIT 1 CORPUS CHRISTI. TEX. DRAWN: AGR DES GNEDI DA1E DISCRIPION DATE: OCT. 201f. - Z E; El, 1/1111 UNE E. TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY SEPARATE CONTRACT. +00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 LINE E PROFILE EXHIBIT 3 w:: 11111111111111111110 R., 0 1111111111111111111 ..1 5 • i 1 e s Ii URBAN ENGINEERINGUV SANITARY SEWER PROFILE LNE E * - INT 1 CORPUS CHRISTI. TEXASDATE: C EC ED f iiRUFESIE OCT. 2016 N28'42291 574.24 I ik, 0J 40 • 40 1 1:1 . , .'‘-..1 e.111, loud Drive 5; „, k 1 2 MI 8% 13 II 12 g- 11 AI NT 9 '33 7 f gi q;;; ,9 ;MN 1,E' 'II RIR. 3.3 gy ' IDNERR /U 15 f ;Mai !I 17 1 li . r 20 .34 gi 21 22 23 4 IDEr R /U E 14 1 13 mih 1 12 1 11 -2"----4rik 1C 1 1 9 '42 1 8 7 1 iggl!!4 44m4ggs 1 1 1 4 -2 • - 3 a -se.o.s , EE-, 1 / 14 '• 13 ; 14 sal , =,•' - - 12 11 , 10 9 123 1i 2 t- I 1'IiI : 2, .3 . , . II 24 1 5 1 E., 4111N4k Ili E •., 1 33„25 ,,,,, 1 6' 26 27 1 ,,,,— 1 i 28 11 Jr4tEk 1 s !st i 1 3 g -2 1 ; q.:;,u, 1 1 3,3 iii;joi 0E43, 4233 0322E• t 1 --, 4 -2 - ...a -a— - T -r-,-: :1 i 3 0 4 : a • 11 I I 1 • • 1 . 1 LID,C La -, Ranch View Drive 1? 4 " ' ,332.6.406 4•3334Emegas g 111 / 43 ,1111., ! ..... , zli 223 Id -A 8 •; g ''' !...- 'E „ 1, .,2o1R 1 0 4 g a - ^ \ ,k . ',>NCJ 528-4729W- 5.-0D- 44 D' E. 0 1 . 1 1 1 1 &I Co , URBAN 0 ENGINEERING STORM SEWER LAYOUT DRAWN: 33 by DA1E DI MN wo k ,,TO, DES EDI f RIVERBEW MEMNON INT 1 CORPUS CHRISTI. TEX. iiieRFZEADE 1I1%1110,1=T1' DATE: OCT .16 £ 1ICIIHXT lid FAS oil wal. L 1 ax CITY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATION TO BE MET Z m r ag kW I I E URBAN l� ENGINEERING iFAUFZEME STORM SEWER PROFILES LINES Dl—D2 MENEEM) SUMMON MIT t CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXA DRAM. AGR YIEv.6� 2 DES DNED. DESCRPTOR C EC ED DATE: OCT. 3016 £ 1IHIHXT • e N m m �1 8 0.01 01-0 II/ Ifs 1 m S g W,110- WWI SS re - 1 4; IU fi I (� (� URBAN ENGINEERING CITY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATION TO BE MET 0.1 P STORM SSEEWERPPROFILES NVERBEW SUMMON MIT t CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXN z m s i m ig cn ac or- lOs cH cx DRAM. .OR YIEv.6� 2 DES GRECI DISCRUTOX C EC ED DATE: OCT. 3016 E mill 144 11 ia2 ai j, Egg i. iii. - ,i��` f g ! mg Ail ,r��, �R .1Ing5 .fieIN 11 F e< ..9...,.......P 95 OP 61,111 � '7-",, „ � ao,4 p!D rz - v;Q���-Er _y.w 2 ,�o + , N , �� t , % 4 z$ IA y 22 S 6g n K = A�u N mm No I;�, Iii URBAN s lj ENGINEERING ` OFFSITE DITCH LAYOUT — SHEET 1 DRAWN ACR hE•.b DA oEumrnw `�� '.. PoVEREIBM BUNINISPN CORPUS CIHRIIST, TEXAS DEE D urn oweis„m ,.,.am,, aza mm lNYmU GATE. OCT. 4016 EXHIBIT _,_~~ V ir, $ .1 , . I I' - ) 1 . , 1 , Ap JO ,.n,, I* 3. <.,,,,X-1,:? - - - 3111 Ipio gazg I J 1`,): ‘rwatitswirmAlpir zoi-nv ‘ --,gre5W.....i01 _ tet ii. v ,...— AV ' '." ' 0-,.5-,-4 -, " ,Ii' , to „-r,- ."--, - : • '',.: 6 II URBAN ENGINEERING % OFFSITE DITCH LAYOUT - SHEET 2 DRAWN: ., ,,,..,,, DES EDI RIVERBEW SUNINISPN UM 1 CORPUS CHRISTI. TEX. CHECKED: LIEH iiRFORLIEVE —70401var DATE: OCT .16 --a a N284229”E 574.247 :',.',.:,F.‘",,.,,,;,':: 1 1 ' i WPM.' Alillia' 5; ' EXHIBIT k 14 5 .4' ! g .1 lk 15 IV ee 14 / 14 13 7 - 16 13 13 12 k a- 11 17 12 12 ss 11 II:I, 18 11 4+ Vi 11 , ,-s io r 1 ‘ 19 0 1D 10 9 80 21 , 16. 4.... 1 01 riii 7 m"" ,-, i 22 7 6 Es c, i 23 6 ., 6 .C! a 5 I 24 5 5 4 -E, 254 ki I k ‘ , 2 11 27 k ,o 10YR TE 4111. 28 10YR,/UE , 10Y,R/UE ' R. 10YR /UE D F (Doc No &P H N E ) we,. DI -11 . \ pgi •k e 5-, 7 -- 1 = 1 I ,, 6__I___L__1___ A k. _ -.__. t k ------- _ 111 Mill 1 i 01 On i 'WI S2134225—W 'OPRNd) OD- 1 ro 0 0 ql I s Ii URBAN ENGINEERING .• DRAINAGE PLAN DRAWN o u .ty DES EDI RIVERBISII SUNINISPN INT 1 CORPUS CHRISTI TEXAS CHECKED NM EFIWRZeZE ,,,,,==. ' DATE. OCT .16 I URBAN ENGINEERING VaiFEEVE DY 911q VRIV 03E161E10 11101 11? if ilP t 40 POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND DETALS MENEM SUMMON INT 1 CORPUS CHRISTI. TEX. DRAWN: DRAFTER E. lax DESI EIDESID ER DATE: OCT. 2016 \V £ 1IHIHX1 LEURBAN ENGINEERING iiP I ala 1 ( m CfRITE POLLUTION PREVDMON RAN AND DUALS RIVERBEW SUMMON INT 1 CORPUS CHRISTI. TEXAS DRAWN: DRAME D PI DE EIBESID DA OC .16 £ IICIIHX1 LA, CITY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATION TO BE MET 004 I URBAN ENGINEERING VaiFEEVE PAVIIG DETALS RIVERBEW SUMMON INT 1 CORPUS CHRISTI. TEX. DRAwu: DRPMER DESIGNEEDESIG ER DAIE DEscRornox DATE: OCT. 201E. £1ICIIHXT (CITY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATION TO BE MET g 0 e M 2 N ti k"4 I I E URBAN l� ENGINEERING SIGN AND DRNEWAY DETAL MMSEM BUBdNI M MT 1 CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXP DRPxx DRPfT DESIGNEEDESIG ER DISCRIPION C EC ED DATE: OCT. 3016 (0)1, [� > ' Y .� . . .. .Y `1. , 1 -,,, t, �0��` �� : 11:11 0 x\\\\\\\) • ‘ V' lim 11 11 \\\\\\\\\ �u� ���� URBAN ENGINEERING DIRT SPREAD MAP ,,,.,,' ~�~ENGINEERING���` RIVERBED SUBDIVISION 1 CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS ~~~ MFH | U | VaiFEEVEUNIT P =Pr' ~ OCT 2016 M�� RIVER BEND RANCH UNIT 1 12" GRIDMAIN WATERLINE REIMBURSEMENT LOCATION MAP Scale: NONE Dept. of Engineering Services EXHIBIT A Sheet 1 of 3 EXHIBIT 3 23 of 25 GA6 GAS —GAS CAS GAS - 1E 10 oast. ir M111 1rxlr WNW No ir GATE YALE 0 ‘§`• ✓ GASy/�A //,,..II,,• —GAS s�4�,�w1�`� GAS GAS —GAS C S fwl ' GAS Y�) L (W) - 1VPIL-'Y. w) �. nL- w w KTOWN BL w w STALL -RI ASSEMBLY 1r CA1E YALE .00 I \ 1-- 1I \ li ✓ IE1f w w w RIVERBEND UNIT 1 INSTAL 1-411 AS90 LY 1-12' ME Wa1LVE I \Q. \Q. RIVER BEND RANCH UNIT 1 12" GRIDMAIN WATERLINE REIMBURSEMENT WATERLINE PLAN Scale: 1"=100' Dept. of Engineering Services EXHIBIT B Sheet 2 of 3 EXHIBIT 3 24 of 25 EXIST. FORCE MAIN - YORKTOWN BOULEVARD 0 03 0 25' STREET DEDICATION — — 12" WATER GRID MAIN -f 'I 42" WATER TRANS. MAIN—" \-15' U.E. '\ UTILITY PLACEMENT DETAIL RIVER BEND RANCH UNIT 1 12" GRIDMAIN WATERLINE REIMBURSEMENT U1NJ1Y PLACEMENT DET?JL Scale: 1"=40' Dept. of Engineering Services EXHIBIT C Sheet 3 of 3 EXHIBIT 3 25 of 25 Eng: Muff Hudson, P.E. By: M.C.Y. Opinion of Probable Cost for RIVERBEND UNIT ONE GRID MAIN WATERLINE REIMBURSEMENT ITEM DESCRIPTION QUAN. QUAN. + UNIT UNIT TOTAL 5% PRICE COST A. OFF-SITE WATER IMPROVEMENTS: _ 1 12"x6" Ductile Iron Tee 1 1 EA $700.00 $700.00 2 12" PVC C-900 1,835 1,927 LF $48.50 $93,459.50 3 12" Gate Valve and Box 4 4 EA $2,945.00 $11,780.00 4 Fire Hydrant Assembly Complete In-place 3 3 EA $3,248.00 $9,744.00 5 12" Cap W/2" Blow -Off Valve 1 1 EA $645.00 $645.00 6 Tie to Existing Waterline 1 1 EA $1,445.00 $1,445.00 OFF-SITE WATER SUB -TOTAL: $117,773.50 ENGINEERING, TESTING AND STAKING © 11.50%n: $13,543.95 GRAND TOTAL: $131,317.45 Urban Engineering 2725 Swantner Corpus Christi, TX 78404 1-361-854-3101 EXHIBIT 4 Nov. 16, 2016 Job No. 39595.B5.00 9 ;;004(;,,,,7-64!q94,401,0)111, . p r ^. ! loca.o ¢n nnneenx ...neea.; eAnt�ent+en� �? f.l can,�rm��.ne�A=-�^n., '.i1-0 l 1of1 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS I. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY INSURANCE A. Contractor must not commence work under this contract until all insurance required has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Contractor must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. B. Contractor must furnish to the City's Risk Manager and Director of Development Services one (1) copy of Certificates of Insurance with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies, and a waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with Certificate of Insurance. Project name and/or number must be listed in Description Box of Certificate of Insurance. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -day advance written notice of cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination required on all certificates and policies. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate Commercial General Liability including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises — Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Occurrence AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non -Owned 3. Rented/Leased $500,000 Combined Single Limit WORKERS'S COMPENSATION (All States Endorsement if Company is not domiciled in Texas) Employer's Liability Statutory and complies with Part II of this Exhibit. $500,000/$500,000/$500,000 PROPERTY INSURANCE Contractor is responsible for insuring all owned, leased and rented personal property. C. In the event of accidents of any kind related to this contract, Contractor must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. EXHIBIT 5 1 OF 3 II. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Applicable for paid employees, Contractor must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers' compensation coverage provided must be in an amount sufficient to assure that all workers' compensation obligations incurred by the Contractor will be promptly met. An All States Endorsement shall be required if Contractor is not domiciled in the State of Texas. B. Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Contractor's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. C. Contractor shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement Certificate of Insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of any change made by the Contractor or as requested by the City. Contractor shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Exhibit shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 D. Contractor agrees that, with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • List the City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, as additional insureds by endorsement with regard to operations, completed operations, and activities of or on behalf of the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; • Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and • Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any, cancellation, non- renewal, material change or termination in coverage and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. E. Within five (5) calendar days of a cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination of coverage, Contractor shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Contractor's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. F. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Contractor's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Contractor to stop work hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) which EXHIBIT 5 2 OF 3 become due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. G. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contractor's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this contract. H. It is agreed that Contractor's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this contract. I. It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this contract. 2015 Insurance Requirements Development Services UPA —Private Water Line 2/13/2015 ds Risk Management EXHIBIT 5 3 OF 3 City of Corpus =Christi bimaimaimastswasioas DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS City orCorpus Christi, Teras Department of Development Services P O Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469.9277 (361) 826-3240 Located at. 2406 Leopard Street (Corner of Leopard St. and Por? Ave ) City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112. as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable. answer with "NA". NAME: Oso Bend Development Company, a Texas Corporation STREET: 101 N. Shoreline Blvd, Suite 600 CITY: Corpus Christi, Texas ZIP: 78401 FIRM is: x❑ Corporation ❑ Partnership ❑ Sole Owner 0 Association ['Other DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Job Title and City Department (if known) N/A 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an 'ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name NIA Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an `ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Board, Commission, or Committee N/A 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name N/A Consultant CERTIFICATE I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: John W. Wallace (Print) Signature of Certifying Person: K.IDEVELOPMENTSVCSLSHAREDSLAND DEVELOPM STATEMENT! 2712 -DOC Title: Vice -President Date: Lk.—k-1 ORDINANCE ADM INISTRATIONIAPPLICATION FORMSkFOAMS AS PER LEGALl:11.124DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS Exhibit 6 Page 1 of 2 DEFINITIONS a. "Board Member". A member of any board, commission or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Employee". Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, either on a full or part time basis, but not as an independent contractor. c. "Firm". Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust and entities which, for purposes of taxation, are treated as non-profit organizations. d. "Official". The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. e. "Ownership Interest". Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holding or control established through voting trusts, proxies or special terms of venture or partnership agreements. 1. "Consultant'. Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. ti 1DEV ELOPMENTSVCSLSHARED\LAND DEV ELOPMENTIORDINANCE ADMINIS1RATION APPLICATION FORMS\FORMS AS PER LEOALl2OI2 D15CLOSIJRE OF [NTEREStS SPATEMENTI2712DOC Exhibit 6 Page 2 of 2 kr..r.ftr. City of Corpus Christi DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS City of Corpus Christi, Texas Department of Development Services P.O. Bax 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 (361) 826-3240 Located at: 2406 Leopard Street (Comer of Leopard St and Port Ave.) City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". NAME: Patricia H. Wallace, Trustee #2 STREET: 101 N. Shoreline Blvd, Suite 600 CITY: Corpus Christi, Texas ZIP: 78401 FIRM is: ❑ Corporation ❑ Partnership ❑x Sole Owner ❑ Association ❑ Other DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS if additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Job Title and City Department (if known) N/A 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Title N/A 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Board, Commission, or Committee N/A 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Consultant N/A CERTIFICATE certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Patricia H. Wallace Title: Trustee #2 (Print) Signature of Certifying Person.-"""�"' ` `"� Date: r .nr:v$r nntirrxravrrCHrevrnu exnnrvrr npsn-aT-npn'xer.rn enMrxrcrverinnnannr rrerrnxrnvmaunRPIc ec pro Irrer ,..rn nicrr ncrmrr>FrruWpnpcTc DEFINITIONS a. "Board Member". A member of any board, commission or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Employee". Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, either on a full or part time basis, but not as an independent contractor. c. "Firm". Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust and entities which, for purposes of taxation, are treated as non-profit organizations. d. "Official". The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. e. "Ownership Interest". Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holding or control established through voting trusts, proxies or special terms of venture or partnership agreements. f. "Consultant". Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. City of 11P1 Corpus c Christi tirdWarmumarsoll DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS City or Corpus Christi, Texas Department of Development Services P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 (361) 826-3240 Located at: 2406 Leopard Street (Corner of Leopard St. and Pon Ave.) City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112, as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". NAME: Urban Engineering STREET: 2725 Swantner CITY: Corpus Christi, Texas ZIP: 78404 FIRM is: ❑ Corporation x❑ Partnership ❑ Sole Owner 0 Association ['Other DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each "employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an 'ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Job Title and City Department (if known) NIA 2. State the names of each 'official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership Interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name 'Title N/A 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Board, Commission, or Committee NIA 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm". Name Consultant N/A CERTIFICATE I certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that i have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Xavier Galan (Print) Signature of Certifying Person: KIDEVELOPMENTSVCSLSHAREDU.ANDDEW Lor IENT1ORDINANC DM INISTRATI STATEAIENT127 12 DOC Exhi Title: Project Manager Date: "1—��--1 TION FORMSIFORMS AS PER LEGA L\21II2YDISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS Page 1 of 2 DEFINITIONS a. "Board Member". A member of any board, commission or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Employee". Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, either on a full or part time basis, but not as an independent contractor. c. "Firm". Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust and entities which, for purposes of taxation, are treated as non-profit organizations. d. "Official". The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. e. "Ownership Interest". Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holding or control established through voting trusts, proxies or special terms of venture or partnership agreements. f. "Consultant". Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. k DE', ELOPMENTSVCSLSI IAREDSLAND DE VELOPMENTORDINANCE ADMINISTRATIONIAPPLICATION POWWOWS AS PER LEGAL121112117ISCLOSt1RE OF INTERESTS STATEAlENT127 I2 DOC Exhibit 6 Page 2 of 2 DDC$ 2005007409 Notice of coaIIdenthlity rights: If you area natural person, yon may remove or strike any of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record in the public records: your Social Seenrity number or your driver's license number. Warranty Deed Date: February 1, 2005 Grantor. JOHN WALLACE, TRUSTEE Grantor's Mailing Address: [include county] 101 N. Shoreline, Suite 600 Corpus Christi, Nueces County Texas 78401 Grantee: PATRICIA H WALLACE, TRUSTEE #2 Grantee's Mailing Address: (include county] 101 N. Shoreline, Suite 600 Corpus Christi, Nueces County Texas 78401 Consideration: Ten and no/100 Dollars and other valuable consideration Property (including any improvements): Fieldnotes for a 60.073 acre tract of land, being all of Lots 22, 23 and 24, Section 25, Flour Bluff and Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts, a map of which is recorded in Volume A, Pages 41 thru 43, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas; said 60,073 acre tract being more fully described by metes and bounds attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein, to which reference is here made for all purposes. Reservations from and Exceptions to Conveyance and Warranty: 1) Any and all restrictions, covenants, easements, conditions, rights-of-way, mineral grants and reservations, and mineral leases, if any relating to the Property , but only to the extent they are still in effect and shown of record; All zoning laws, regulations and ordinances of municipal and/or other governmental authorities, if any, but only to the extent that they relate to the Property and are still in effect; and 3) Standby fees, taxes and assessments by any taxing authority for the year 2004 and all subsequent years. GRANTOR IS CONVEYING AND GRANTEE ISACCEPTING THE PROPERTY "AS IS", I N ITS PRESENT CONDITION. Grantor, for the Consideration and subject to the Reservations from Conveyance and the Exceptions to Conveyance and Warranty, grants, sells, and conveys to Grantee the Property, together with all and singular the rights and appurtenances thereto in any way belonging, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Grantor binds Grantor and Grantor's heirs and successors to warrant and forever defend all and singular the Property to Grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors, and assigns against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same or any part thereof, except as to the Reservations from Conveyance and the Exceptions to Conveyance and Warranty. When the context requires, singular nouns and awitopo PATRICIA H. WALLACE, TRUSTEE #2 e plural. W. WALLACE, TRUSTEE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NUECES $ $ This instrument was acknowledged b re me on the day of February , 2005 by JOHN W. WALLACE, TRUSTEE. rwwp,w• w ww w. -•s, TERESA WOODRUM ®. NaP STATEE OF TEXAS ♦°� Nr Came. E.o. C9 t0 2005 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NUECES $ $ Notary Public, STATE OF TEXAS Printed Name of Notary My Commission Expj _ This instrument was acknowledged before me on the Is day of February , 2005 by PATRICIA H. WALLACE, TRUSTEE #2 _ TERESA WOOORUM Netay Roe STATE OF TEXAS lay Con. Ev.O5•10 2005 .............. o .. othottiL, �Ilotary Public, STATE OF TEXAS ' Printed Name of Notary My Commission Expires: AFTER RECORDING. RETURN TO: PATRICIA IL WALLCE, TRUSTEE ii2 101 N. Shoreline, Suite 600 Corpus Christi, Pfueces County Texas 78401 EXHIBIT 'A' Property: Yorktown Blvd., Corpus Mind, 1X Aeldnot■e far a 60.073 acre tract of land, being all of Lob 22, 23 and 24, Section 25, Flour Bluff and Endnal Farm and Garden Trade, a map of which Is recorded In Volume A, Pager 41 thru 43,146p Records of Nueoes County, Texas; said 60.073 ace tract being more fully deecrlbed as follows: Beginning at a magnetic naN found on the underline of Yorktown Boulevard, an ehdsting 30 -foot wide roadway, for the oast corny of Lot 21, said Section 25, far the north corner of said Lot 22 and for the north corner of this ttac4 T encs, South 61.17'51' East;, with the centerline of Bald Yorktown Boulevard, same being the northeast boundary of said Lob 22, 23 and 24, a distance of 1982.31 Mat to a magnetic nad set at the Intersection of said centerline of Yorktown Boulevard and the centerline of Starry Road, a 40 foot wide roadway, for the north corner of Lot 7, Section 34, said Row Bluff and Endnal Farm and Garden Tracts, for the asst comer of said Lot 24, Section 25 and for the east corner of this tract; Thence, South 28841'33' West, with the common boundary of said Lot 24, Section 25 and said Lot 7, Section 34, same being the southeast boundary of this tract, at 40.00 Mat pass a 5/8 Inde Iron rod with red plastic cap stamped 'URBAN ENG C.C. Tle set on line, In ail ■ total distance of 1320.00 Mat to a 5/8 Inde Iron rod with red plastic cap stamped "URBAN ENG C.C. TX' set for the common corner of Lots 24 and 25, Section 25 end Lob 7 and 15, Section 34 and for the south corner of Ms trady from which corner a found 5/8 Inde Iron rod with cap stamped "RPLS 3.+158' bears South 28.42'09' East 0.65 Thence, North 61.1751' West, with the common boundary of Lob 24 and 25, of Lob 23 and 26 and of Lob 22 and 27, same being the southwest boundary of this tract, a distance of 1982.54 Mat to a 5/8 inch Iron rod with red platic cap stamped "URBAN ENG C.C. Tr sat for Uu common corner of Lota2l, 22, 27 and 28, said Section 25 and for the west corner of this tract; Thence, North 28.42'09" bat, with the common boundary of said Lob 21 and 22, Section 25, same being the northwest boundary of this text, at 1280.00 Met pass a 5/8 inch Iron rod with red plastic ap stamped "URBAN ENG C.C. TX' set an the existing southwest boundary of Yorktown Boulevard, In all a total distance of 1320.00 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 60.073 acres of land of which 1.821 acres He within the 40 foot wide right-of-way of Yorktown Boulevard and 0.588 acres lie within the 20 foot wideright-of-way of any Road, for a net amount of 57.644 acres of land. Note: The Company is prohibited from Insuring the area or quantity of the land described herein. Any statement In the above legal description of the area or quantity of land Is not a representation that such area or quantity is affect, but Is made only for informational and/or identification purposes and does not override Item 2 of Schedule i! hereof. A.P.N. 0 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NIECES 1 herb/ se* drift interweaves FI,EDh Fee tenter Sequence an Ira dee id sten thrlr stoned herds rif me, aid was dtay RECORDED, in Humes Crusty, Tents the Mid PuAit Awards Of COUNTY CLERIC NUECES cotinY, TEM Aver prom Awn etich relicts ere Sale. Read) awe of the doral ed lfk PROPERTY bra= d Rua, (bier. Arklai. Sri. Hoof* Fouler Selma or Mart eil9in. h Ted and enerdemrehk aider FEDERAL LAW. 3J12/89 CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTIONS OF Oso Bend Development Company, a Texas Corporation Riverbend Subdivision Unit 1 (Grid Main Water Line Extension Construction and Reimbursement Agreement) The undersigned, authorized Vice -President of Oso Bend Development Company, a Texas Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify as follows: (1) That I am the duly elected and qualified Vice -President of the Company and the custodian of the Company's records; (2) That set forth below is a true and correct restatement of certain Resolutions adopted by the directors of the Company by appropriate action. WHEREAS, the Company desires to enter into a Grid Main Water Line Extension Construction and Reimbursement Agreement related to Riverbend Subdivision Unit 1 ("Reimbursement Agreement"). NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby adopts and consents to the following resolutions: RESOLVED, that the Vice -President of the Company be, and is hereby authorized and directed to do any and all things deemed necessary or advisable and in the best interest of the Company, in such individual's sole discretion, in relation to the Grid Main Water Line Extension Construction and Reimbursement Agreement, and the Vice - President is hereby authorized to execute, and the Company hereby ratifies and confirms any execution and delivery of the Grid Main Water Line Extension Construction and Reimbursement Agreement and any third party may rely upon the foregoing grant of authority without further inquiry with respect to all acts subsequent hereto by Company. (3) That none of the Resolutions set forth above have been amended, modified, revoked, or rescinded; and each such Resolution is in full force and effect on the date hereof; (4) That the following are the duly elected, qualified and serving officers of the Company, that the address is as stated in connection with each, and that the signature set out opposite the name of the officer is the genuine signature of such person, to -wit: NAME AND ADDRESS SIGNATURE Vice -President: John W. Wallace 101 N. Shoreline, Suite 600 Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 State of Texas Count of Nueces W. Wallace, Vice -President This instrument was acknowledged before me on Vic, I 0 2017, by John W. Wallace, Vice -President of Oso Bend Development Compan Texas Corporation, on behalf of said corporation. XAVIER GALVAN Notary IDI 125186163 My Commission Expires February 1. 2021 No i'y l4lic in and for the ate Texas L CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties, OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING 1 Certificate Number: 2017-193760 Date Filed: 04/17/2017 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Patricia H. Wallace, Trustee #2 Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. Riverbend Subdivision Unit 1 Water Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Construction and Reimbursement Agreement 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling 1 Intermediary Wallace, Patricia Corpus Christi, TX United States X Urban Engineering Corpus Christi, TX United States X 5 Check if is NO Interested Party. only there ■ 6 AFFIDAVIT I AFFIX Sworn 20 etJOLENE E POTTER My commission Expires July 24, 2017 NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE to and subscribed before me, by the said '[SIA I swear, or affirm, der penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. I II t/ . ) Se ature o authorized age of ntracting business entity /� ,, trete__ 2 If- 4 t-U� , this the i q day of+t-p'1r; 1 1 , to certify which, witness my hand and seal ��'EEE office. D 6 Ie ntr C I a r A /r1/.(/ gede 41" I ehhs rimed name of officer administering oath Tide of officer administering oath ) i 17/ f 4 i iministering Signature of officer oath , c nrnvirrorl by Tovac Fthire rnmmieainn vwvw_ethir_s_state_tx_us Version V1.0.883 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2017-193655 Date Filed: 04/17/2017 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Oso Bend Development Company Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name oi governmentA entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identity the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. Riverbend Subdivision Unit 1 Water Arterial Transmission and Grid Main Construction and Reimbursement Agreement Name of Interested Party City,State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling 1 Intermediary White, Kathleen Corpus Christi, TX United States X Wallace, Patricia Corpus Christi, TX United States X Wallace, John Corpus Christi, TX United States X Wallace, Ben Corpus Christi, TX United States X Urban Engineering Corpus Christi, TX United States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. o 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the (./....--) above disclosure is true and correct. 4, JOLENE E POTTER ,/ My Commission Whits July 24, 2017 ignature of authorized agent of contracting business entity AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE / (../ 7� Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said l,?/i'i�� f {� %-L� this the / l day of 20 / i , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. £ S4k c t officer administering oath 1 Title of officer administering oath a _ Jr} J6//J2 Signature of officer a ministering oath Punted name of Fn s nrnvided by Texas Ethics Commission www_ethics_state_tx_us Version V1.0.883 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 2406 Leopard First Floor Corpus Christi Texas 78408 Phone 361-826-32-10 wv w.cctexas.com Administration Fax 361-826-3006 Land Development Fax 361-826-3571 Project Management Fax 161-826-3006 Building Permits Fax 361-826-4375 October 26, 2016 Patricia H. Wallace 101 N. Shoreline Blvd, Ste 600 Corpus Christi, TX 78401 RE: Case No. 0916115-P046 (16-22000044) Riverbend Subdivision (Final —14.16 Acres) Dear Ms. Wallace: On Wednesday, October 19, 2016, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on your land subdivision located east of Rodd Field Road and south of Yorktown Boulevard. After reviewing facts and taking public testimony, the Planning Commission approved your land subdivision. The final plat must be recorded with the Nueces County Clerk's office by April 19, 2017. Please note this letter will be the only notification of the plat expiration date. Prior to plat recordation, the following requirements must be met and fees paid: 1. Water Distribution System Acreage fee 2. Wastewater System Acreage fee 3. Park Development fee 4. Community Enrichment Fund fee 5. Public Improvements and construction required (see Engineering comment #5) 6. Recording fee for one page 144.00 for any additional pages 7. Provide a tax certificate with submittal of the original tracing indicating all taxes are current. *Please make checks payable to the City of Corpus Christi ($13,650.00) ($29,475.00) ($15,000.00) ($46,875.00) ($ 98.00) In order to expedite the processing of building permits, changes to street names will no longer be accepted once the Planning Commission takes action on the final plat. If you have any questions regarding the above, please call me at (361) 826-3535. Rgm:cg cc: Xavier Galvan Urban Engineering 2725 Swantner Dr. Corpus Christi, TX 78404 Sincerely, Renissa M. Garza Montalvo, AICP, CPRP Senior City Planner Land Development Division Vicinity Map Aerial Overview AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading for the City Council Meeting of June 13, 2017 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of June 20, 2017 DATE: TO: May 26, 2017 Margie C. Rose, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager MarkVV@cctexas.com (361) 826-3082 Valerie H. Gray, P.E., Executive Director, Public Works ValerieG@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: Jeff Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Ordinance for the acquisition of real property rights by eminent domain for the Rodd Field Road Expansion Project CAPTION: An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (1) determining the public necessity and public use for the acquisition of Right -of -Way Easements, Temporary Construction Easements and fee simple property rights for a street improvement project known as the Rodd Field Road Expansion Project, generally from Saratoga Boulevard to Yorktown Boulevard (Bond 2014); (2) authorizing the City Manager or designee to negotiate and execute all documents necessary to acquire the property interests subject to availability of funds appropriated for such purposes; (3) authorizing the City Manager to institute condemnation by eminent domain proceedings to acquire easement and fee simple property interests in the properties within the project area depicted on the Project Location Map; (4) authorizing payment pursuant to an award by special commissioners; (5) authorizing acceptance and recording of appropriate legal instruments; and (6) approving condemnation for all units of property to be acquired by condemnation herein by a single record vote of the City Council. PURPOSE: This Ordinance fulfills the legal requirement that a municipality, through its governing body, must first pass a vote through an ordinance or resolution which declares the public use and public necessity for a project. The passage of the Ordinance by the governing body (City Council) authorizes the City Manager or her designee to negotiate the acquisition of property rights, execute all real estate purchase contracts and instruments. It also allows the City Manager, City Attorney or designee to proceed with eminent domain proceedings if negotiations for parcel acquisitions should reach an impasse. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: The intersection of Rodd Field Road and Yorktown Boulevard is a critical part of the overall Bond 2014 Rodd Field Road Expansion Project from Saratoga Boulevard to Yorktown Boulevard. The intersection at Rodd Field Road and Yorktown Boulevard is an unimproved area with insufficient right-of-way necessary for the new multi -lane signalized intersection. The design for this project is complete with new curb and gutter, sidewalks, ADA ramps, cycle tracks, medians, signage and pavement markings. The designed intersection improvements require the acquisition of right-of-way within the area shown on the attached Project Site map. The City's design consultant, LJA Engineering, has provided parcel descriptions for two parcels of land needed. Parcel 1, owned by Del Mar College, is located at the northeast corner of the intersection and contains .0917 acres of land. Parcel 2, owned by Nuss Family Partnership Ltd., et al, is located at the northwest corner and contains 1.297 acres of land. City staff will proceed to acquire appraisals and present formal offers of compensation to the owners of record upon passage of this Ordinance. Staff will negotiate in good faith and make all reasonable efforts to acquire these easement or fee simple property rights through negotiations. On September 1, 2011, Texas Senate Bill 18 (SB18) was enacted and requires all entities with eminent domain authority to follow certain procedures prior to initiating eminent domain proceedings under Section §21.012 of the Texas Property Code. These new procedures are more restrictive on the condemning authorities and stipulate certain requirements. One of them is the requirement of a vote on the use of eminent domain by a governmental entity under Section 2206.052 of the Texas Government Code. This ordinance and the motion to adopt it are in a form required under Senate Bill 18 and other state law requirements. ALTERNATIVES: No alternatives are available for a governmental entity to be able to use of its power of eminent domain. Under Texas law, Council must adopt a resolution or ordinance at a public meeting by a record vote delegating its authority. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: The Ordinance conforms to the City Charter, Code of Ordinances, Article X, General Powers and Provisions, Section 1. The ordinance and the motion adopting it conform to Senate Bill 18 (SB18), Chapter 21 of the Property Code, and Chapter 2206.052 of the Government Code. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Engineering Services FINANCIAL IMPACT: [ ] Operating [ ] Revenue [ ] Capital [x] Not applicable Fiscal Year 2016- 2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Fund(s): Comments: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests Council passage of the Ordinance as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Location Map Presentation Ordinance 1 An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas (1) determining the public necessity and public use for the acquisition of Right -of - Way Easements, Temporary Construction Easements and fee simple property rights for a street improvement project known as the Rodd Field Road Expansion Project, generally from Saratoga Boulevard to Yorktown Boulevard (Bond 2014); (2) authorizing the City Manager or designee to negotiate and execute all documents necessary to acquire the property interests subject to availability of funds appropriated for such purposes; (3) authorizing the City Manager to institute condemnation by eminent domain proceedings to acquire easement and fee simple property interests in the properties within the project area depicted on the Project Location Map; (4) authorizing payment pursuant to an award by special commissioners; (5) authorizing acceptance and recording of appropriate legal instruments; and (6) approving condemnation for all units of property to be acquired by condemnation herein by a single record vote of the City Council. WHEREAS, the City of Corpus Christi is in need of a Right -of -Way Easements, Temporary Construction Easements, and fee simple property rights for the purposes of constructing street improvements at the intersection of Rodd Field Road and Yorktown Boulevard; WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 2206.053 of the Texas Government Code, the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, has met after a duly noticed meeting in compliance with the Texas Open Meetings Act, and by a record vote of the City Council, (with no Councilmember objecting to adoption by single ordinance for all units of property for which condemnation proceedings are to be initiated), the City Council has determined to utilize its constitutional and statutory authority to exercise its authority for eminent domain in accordance with State law; and WHEREAS, the Right -of -Way Easements, Temporary Construction Easements, and fee simple property rights are necessary to advance the public uses recited herein; and WHEREAS, Texas Government Code Section 2206.053(f) provides that if a project for a public use will require a governmental entity to acquire multiple tracts or units of property to construct facilities connecting one location to another location, the governing body of the governmental entity may adopt a single ordinance, resolution, or order by record vote that delegates the authority to initiate condemnation proceedings to the chief administrative official of the governmental entity; and WHEREAS, based on an engineering study, the location of said roadway intersection and street related improvements optimizes the enhancement and adequacy of municipal streets; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: 2 Section 1. All of the Recitals are hereby found to be true and correct legislative and factual findings of the City of Corpus Christi Texas, and they are hereby approved and the Recitals are incorporated for all purposes as if they were fully recited herein. Section 2. That the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, hereby finds and determines that a public use and necessity exists for the welfare of the City and its citizens to construct the Rodd Field Road Expansion Project, generally from Saratoga Boulevard to Yorktown Boulevard (Bond 2014), and it is in the public interest to acquire the Right -of -Way and Temporary Construction Easements along with any fee simple property rights needed as shown on the attached Exhibit A - Project Location Map, for such public use; that such acquisition is solely for the public use and necessity of acquiring this uniquely situated land for providing improvements to its municipal street system. Section 3. That the City Manager or designee is hereby authorized on behalf of the City to take all steps necessary to acquire the easement and fee simple property interests for the Rodd Field Road Expansion Project, generally from Saratoga Boulevard to Yorktown Boulevard (Bond 2014), including acceptance and recording of legal documents, all subject to availability of funds appropriated for such purposes. If such offer and an agreement as to damages and compensation cannot be reached, then the City Manager is delegated the authority to direct the City Attorney, or designee, to file or cause to be filed against all interested parties of the property proceedings in eminent domain in accordance with State law to acquire the easement and fee simple interests in the property. If it is later determined that there are any errors in the descriptions contained herein or if later surveys contain more accurate revised description, the City Attorney or designee is authorized to have such errors corrected or revisions made without the necessity of obtaining the City Council approval authorizing the condemnation of the corrected or revised properties. The City Manager or designee is authorized to issue payment pursuant to an award by Special Commissioners in the condemnation matter. Section 4. That the City Manager or designee is fully authorized to negotiate and make final offers and to execute the contracts and instruments necessary to purchase and acquire all properties necessary and to pay for said properties provided the amounts paid are within the Council approved project budget that was approved on January 17, 2017, all without requiring additional City Council consideration or approval. Section 5. That this ordinance authorizing condemnation proceedings over the property described and depicted in the Project Location Map shall be approved by single record vote of the City Council. Section 6. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, and it is so ordained. 3 That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Council Member That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Council Member PASSED AND APPROVED on this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta Joe McComb City Secretary Mayor 4 Exhibit A - Project Location Map Rodd Field Road Expansion Project Project No. E15112 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Rodd Field Road Expansion Project Project No. E15112 CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Corpus Christi Engineering Rodd Field Road Expansion Project (Saratoga to Yorktown) Bond 2016, Proposition 2 Council Presentation June 13, 2017 Location Map 07) Corpus Chr sti Engineering Sp4O N 4 RODD FIELD ROAD EXPANSION PROJECT +ard Island 0 Q �a J NASO rpus ®br \y ob ® � c Q mtg / a` i F 134441.rj Yop'to47n ej ID El ,a 2 Vicinity Map 07) Corpus Chr sti Engineering RODD FIELD ROAD EXPANSION PROJECT Overview Corpus Chrsti Engineering The existing 120 foot wide right-of-way at the south end of Rodd Field has never been improved with asphalt surface. • Design plans call for a 172 foot wide intersection with four south bound lanes and two north bound lanes. Requires acquisition of Parcel 1 (0.0917 acres) owned by Del Mar College and Parcel 2 (1.297 acres) owned by Nuss Family Partnership, et al. • Passage of Ordinance needed to begin acquisition process. Intersection Plan Corpus Chrsti Engineering Questions? 6 AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading for the City Council Meeting of June 13, 2017 Second Reading for the City Council Meeting of June 20, 2017 DATE: May 31, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager markvv©cctexas.com (361) 826-3082 Valerie H. Gray, P. E., Executive Director, Public Works valerieg©cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: Jeffrey H. Edmonds, P. E., Director, Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Andres Leal, Jr., P.E., Director, Street Operations andyl@cctexas.com (361) 826-1957 Amending State Speed Limit in Certain Zones (Ocean Drive) CAPTION: Ordinance amending the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 53, Section 53-254 Schedule V, Increase of State Speed Limit in Certain Zones to update portions of Ocean Drive and increase the speed limit on Ocean Drive, from Sand Dollar Boulevard to Naval Air Station Corpus Christi North Gate; providing for severance; and providing for publication. PURPOSE: This ordinance amendment will establish a speed limit zone of 50 Miles Per Hour (MPH) along Ocean Drive from Sand Dollar Boulevard to the Naval Air Station Corpus Christi (NASCC) North Gate and clarify the text for the existing speed zone limit along Ocean Drive from Airline Road to the Sand Dollar Boulevard. Speed limits allow the motorist to operate a vehicle at a reasonable and safe speed under favorable conditions. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Texas Legislative Code Section 545.352. Prima Facie Speed Limits establishes 30 MPH as the lawful prima facie speed limit for urban districts within Texas. This means 30 MPH is a reasonable and prudent speed to drive under normal conditions. A municipality has the authority to alter a speed above or below the prima facie speed limit based on an engineering and traffic investigation. Officials from NASCC requested Street Operations (Traffic Engineering) to address traffic enforcement issues along Ocean Drive from Sand Dollar Boulevard to the Naval Air Station Corpus Christi (NASCC) North Gate. A staff investigation determined there was no existing ordinance that altered the speed above or below the prima facie speed limit, of 30 MPH, between Sand Dollar Boulevard and the NASCC North Gate. To determine the posted speed limit, a traffic investigation and speed zone study must be performed. In Texas, the guidelines and procedures for a traffic investigation and speed study can be found in the Texas Department of Transportation's (TxDOT's) Procedures for Establishing Speed Zones. Traffic investigations consider factors such as existing roadway features (curves, surface width, constrained shoulder width, etc.), crash history, cross streets, school crossings, and sites that generate traffic. Speed studies determine the 85th percentile speed, which represents the speed most drivers will be traveling at or below, so they are conducted during average weekdays and under favorable weather conditions. The recommended speed limit is generally set to the nearest value ending in 5 or 0. Guidelines in TxDOT's Procedures for Establishing Speed Zones permit a reduction in the final speed limit to less than 10 MPH below the 85th percentile speed based on engineering judgment and factors considered during the traffic investigation. Based on the traffic investigation, there have been a total of three (3) crashes reported along this segment from 2013 to 2016. One crash occurred in 2015 and the remaining two were reported in 2016. The typical street cross-section consists of four (4) travel lanes and lacks shoulders. Narrow shoulders are present along a bridge located east of Sand Dollar Boulevard. This segment is surrounded by water and permits direct beach access off the outside gate entry. There is also a lack of lighting in the area which may create visibility issues at night. The speed study determined the measure 85th percentile speed was 60 MPH. Based on the traffic investigation factors, the City Traffic Engineer recommended reducing the final speed limit 10 MPH below the 85th percentile speed to 50 MPH. The City Traffic Engineer recommended approval of this ordinance amendment to the City Transportation Advisory Commission (CTAC) at their November 28, 2016 meeting. CTAC concurred and approved the recommendation for approval to City Council. Amending this section of the ordinance will require improving the clarity of the existing speed zone limits. This includes revising "entrance of the Texas A&M University -Corpus Christi" to state "Sand Dollar Boulevard". Toward the NASCC North Gate, the 50 MPH speed zone would transition to 30 MPH speed zone ALTERNATIVES: Denial of the proposed amendment to increase the State speed limit above 30 MPH. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Conforms to City Fiscal Policy. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -Emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Engineering Services, Street Operations (Traffic Engineering) FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operatin ❑ Revenue ❑ Capital ® Not applicable Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget Encumbered / Expended Amount This item BALANCE Comments: None RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approval of the ordinance amendment. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Location Map Ordinance Presentation Ordinance amending the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 53, Section 53-254 Schedule V, Increase of State Speed Limit in Certain Zones to update portions of Ocean Drive and increase the speed limit on Ocean Drive, from Sand Dollar Boulevard to Naval Air Station Corpus Christi North Gate; providing for severance; and providing for publication. WHEREAS, in accordance with the Texas Transportation Code and City Code of Ordinances, the maximum reasonable and prudent speed upon the streets of the city is 30 miles per hour; WHEREAS, upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, City Council can declare a different speed to be the maximum reasonable and prudent speed; WHEREAS, speed studies determine the 85th percentile speed, which represents the speed most drivers will be traveling at or below, but the final speed limit may be reduced up to 10 miles per hour based on engineering judgment and other factors considered during the traffic investigation; WHEREAS, the speed study determined that the 85th percentile speed was 60 miles per hour; WHEREAS, other factors considered during the traffic investigation were (1) three crashes in last two years, (2) lack of shoulders and narrow shoulders along a bridge located east of San Dollar Boulevard, (3) beach access, and (4) lack of lighting; WHEREAS, based on the engineering and traffic investigation, the final speed limit should be reduced 10 miles per hour below the 85th percentile speed to be 50 miles per hour. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. All of the Recitals are hereby found to be true and correct legislative and factual findings of the City of Corpus Christi Texas, and they are hereby approved and the Recitals are incorporated for all purposes as if they were fully recited herein. SECTION 2. City Code of Ordinances, Chapter 53 Traffic, Article VIII Schedules, Section 53-254 Schedule V, increase of state speed limit in certain zones is revised as follows: "Sec. 53-254. — Schedule V, increase of state speed limit in certain zones. Page 1 of 4 It is hereby determined upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state law upon the the following streets is less that is necessary for safe operation of vehicles thereon by reason of widely spaced intersections, and it is hereby declared that the speed limit shall be as hereinafter set forth on those streets or parts of streets herein designated at the time specified and they shall become effective when signs are erected giving notice therof: Ocean Drive: From the south curbline of the eastbound lane of Louisiana Parkway to Airline Road -40 mph—At all times. From Airline Road to Sand Dollar Boulevard -45 mph—At all times. Northbound (in -bound traffic): From Airlinc Road to thc north cntrancc of thc Tcxas A&M Univcrsity Corpus Christi '15 mph At all timcs From Sand Dollar Boulevard to the north gate of Naval Air Station – Corpus Christi (NASCC) — 50 mph— At all times. Southbound (out bound traffic): mph At all timcs Southbound (out bound traffic): From a point 125 fcct cast of Country Club Drivc to a point 1,315 fcct east of Country Club Drive 35 mph At all timcs Southbound (out -bound traffic): Drivc to thc north cntrancc of thc Tcxas A&M Univcrsity Corpus Christi '15 mph At all timcs From Sand Dollar Boulevard to a point 748 feet west of the north gate of Naval Air Station – Corpus Christi (NASCC) —50 mph— At all times. SECTION 3. If for any reason any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, Page 2 of 4 phrase, word or provision of this ordinace shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by final judgement of a court of cometent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any other section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance, for it is definite intent of this City Council that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase, word or provision hereof be given full force and effect for its purpose. SECTION 4. Publication shall be made one time in the official publication of the City of Corpus Christi by publishing the caption stating the purpose of the ordinance. This ordinance to become effective upon such publication. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Council Member That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Council Member Page 3 of 4 PASSED AND APPROVED on this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta Joe McComb City Secretary Mayor Page 4 of 4 SCALE: N.T.S. CORPUS CHRISTI BAY TEXAS A&M _. UNIVERSITY . CORPUS CHRISTI, N.A.S.C.C. NORTH GATE • OSO BAY C4RP NAVAL SOUTHBOUND OCEAN DRIVE TOWARDS N.A.S.C.C. GATE LEGEND LOCATION MAP EXISTING POSTED SPEED 45MPH PROPOSED POSTED SPEED 50MPH PROPOSED POSTED SPEED 30MPH OCEAN DRIVE - UPDATE SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE LOCATION MAP CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF STREET OPERATIONS w.r Corpus chr sti Engineering Amending State Speed Limit in Certain Zones (Ocean Drive) City Council Presentation June 13, 2017 Vicinity Map CORPUS CHRISTI BAY SCALE: N.T.S. OCEAN DRIVE UPDATE SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE LEINEEN PRUNE RP & NAS NORTH GTE TEXAS AAOI CORPUS CHRIST Corpus Chr ski Engineering 2 Location Map - Ocean Drive SPEED LIMIT 45 UNIVERSITY CORPUS CHRISTI , OSO BAY 4.9 SCALE: N.T.S. CORPUS CHRISTI BAY SPEED LIMIT 50 N.A.S,C,C. NORTH GATE CORPUS CHRISTI NAVAL AIR STATION SPEED LIMIT SOUTHBOUND OCEAN DRIVE TOWARDS N.A.S.C.C. GATE, LEGEND EXISTING POSTED SPEED 451.1PH PROPOSED POSTED SPEED 50NPH PROPOSED POSTED SPEED 30MPH Cnrptl5 Chr°ski Engineering Scope Corpus Chr ski Engineering • Prima Facie Speed - Reasonable and Prudent Speed in Normal Conditions ➢ 30 MPH (State Speed Limit) for Urban Districts in Texas ➢ Increasing or Decreasing Requires an Ordinance Amendment • Establishing a 50 MPH Speed Limit along Ocean Drive ➢ Sand Dollar Boulevard to Naval Air Station Corpus Christi North Gate 4 Corpus Chr ski Engineering Questions? AGENDA MEMORANDUM First Reading at the City Council Meeting of June 13, 2017 Second Reading at the City Council Meeting of June 20, 2017 DATE: June 2, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager THRU: Sylvia Carrillo -Trevino, Assistant City Manger FROM: Constance P. Sanchez, Director of Financial Services ConstanceP@cctexas.com (361) 826-3227 Approval for the resale of 26 foreclosed properties CAPTION: Ordinance authorizing the resale of 26 properties for $96,850.00 which were foreclosed upon for failure to pay ad valorem taxes, of which the City shall receive $8,213.35 plus $15,790.35 for partial payment of City paving and demolition liens. PURPOSE: Nueces County, as trustee for each of the taxing entities, has received offers to purchase properties that have been foreclosed upon for failure to pay ad valorem taxes. The governing body from each of the taxing entities (the City of Corpus Christi, Nueces, County, Corpus Christi Independent School District, and Del Mar College) must approve the offers for resale. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Properties within the City of Corpus Christi are periodically foreclosed due to non- payment of ad valorem taxes. The City and Nueces County entered into an Interlocal Agreement for the collection of delinquent ad valorem taxes. Nueces County has contracted with the law firm of Linebarger, Goggan, Blair, & Sampson, L.L.P. to pursue collections of delinquent ad valorem taxes. When all avenues for collections are exhausted, foreclosed properties with delinquent ad valorem taxes are offered for sale at a public auction by the Sheriff. The opening bid at the "Sheriff's sale" is set by law and must be either the aggregate amount of taxes, municipal liens, and court costs due under the judgment or the adjudged value of the property, whichever is lower. (The adjudged value is the value stated on the face of the judgment and is the most recent tax appraisal value certified by the Nueces County Appraisal District.) If nobody is willing to pay the opening bid amount for the property, then the Sheriff strikes it off (sells it) to the taxing entities. The taxing entities then get the property in lieu of their delinquent taxes. The law firm will then put the property on their tax resale list, will nail a "For Sale" sign on the property, and will solicit purchase offers from the public. When an offer or offers are received, they then bring the highest offer forward for consideration and action by the governing bodies of the involved taxing entities. All the entities must approve the offer, or it is rejected. The law firm has proposed the resale of 30 properties at the bid prices listed in Exhibit A. Each of the 30 properties was reviewed by Facilities, Engineering, Planning/Environmental and Strategic Initiative (ESI), Housing and Community Development, and Parks and Recreation for potential City use. Planning/ESI identified four properties (#2, #4, #5 and #23 on Exhibit A) located within the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) to remove from the list — leaving 26 properties. The sale of these properties for development purposes would not be consistent with the recommendations identified within the Joint Land Use Study for land -use compatibility around our naval airfields. The neighborhoods in which these lots are located already exceed the recommended density for single family development. The monies received from this sale are distributed pursuant to the property tax code. The net proceeds from the sale are first applied to pay off the outstanding court costs and the remaining funds are applied on a pro rata basis to each taxing jurisdiction. Approval of the ordinance will authorize the Nueces County Judge to execute a Resale Deed for the properties listed so they can be returned to the property tax roll for the upcoming year. ALTERNATIVES: n/a OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: The list of resale properties received from the law firm contained 30 properties. Each of the 30 properties was reviewed by Facilities, Engineering, Planning/Environmental and Strategic Initiative (ESI), Housing and Community Development, and Parks and Recreation for potential City use. Planning/ESI identified four properties (#2, #4, #5 and #23 on Exhibit A) located within the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) to remove from the list. Since Nueces County holds title as Trustee for themselves, the City, Flour Bluff Independent School District, and Del Mar College, the City's next step would be to acquire the interests from each of these entities by making an offer for the property. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This item conforms to City policy. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: This item is not an emergency and is scheduled for approval in two readings. DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: • City Attorney's Office • Facilities • Engineering • Planning/ESI • Housing and Community Development • Parks and Recreation FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Operating Expense X Revenue ❑ CIP FISCAL YEAR: Project to Date Exp. (CIP Only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Budget - - - - Encumbered/Expended amount of (date) - - - - This item - $ 24,003.70 - $ 24,003.70 BALANCE - $ 24,003.70 - $ 24,003.70 FUND(S): General Fund COMMENTS: n/a RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance as presented. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Exhibit A — Tax Resale Property List Exhibit B — Letter from Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP Ordinance EXHIBIT A TAX RESALE PROPERTY LIST Item # Suit Number Property Location Legal Description Amount of Bid City's Portion C'ite's Portion of City Paving and Demo U., 1 1737 03-1971-B 1520 Mestina 3795-0009-0050: Lot 5, Block 9, Jones Addition $ 4,500.00 S 630.06 S 68.86 2 Pulled. See below. 3 1804 10-3474-C 1949 Sandy Way 2127-0008-0400; Lot 40, Block'' H', Don Patricio Subdivision 4,100.00 587.66 508.11 4 Pulled. See below. 5 Pulled. See below. 6 2103 2011DCV-2148-G 140 Watson 8284-0010-0225; The East 1/2 of Lot 22 and the West 6.0 feet of Lot 23, Block 10, Southmoreland Addition 1,250.00 0.59 10.76 7 2110 2012DCV-4402-F 329 Picture Court 2486-0008-0038; Tract E of Lot 3, Block H, Flour Bluff Estates 1,500.00 200.77 84.31 8 2111 201IDCV-2152-H 1416 San Juan 6403-0003-0140 and 6103-0003-0145; Lot 14, Block C, Parker Addition 1,150.00 58.05 438.75 9 2133 2012DCV-2287-G 929 Louis Lynch Drive 2780-0002-0170; Lot 17, Block 2, Subdivision of the Geistman Tract 2,700.00 45.25 719.61 10 2134 2011DCV-0854-H 3810 Sarita 8724-0010-0120; Lot 12, Block 10, Temple Addition 8,000.00 677.25 2,218.32 11 2135 2012DCV-0822-A 2214 Kennedy Avenue 8013-0004-0120; Lot 12-A, Block 4, Shoreline Park 2,500.00 102.00 388.57 12 2136 2013DCV-3283-B 532 19th Street 3775-0000-0030; Lot 3 Jasmin Addition 1,000.00 - - 13 2144 10-3487-G 1725 Hudson 1585-0005-0270; Lot 27, Block 5, Second Revision of Chula Vista Addition No. 1 10,000.00 1,485.58 1,493.02 14 2146 201IDCV-1435-F 1322 Stillman Avenue 3443-0022-0130; Lots 13 and 14, Block 22, Hillcrest Addition 2,500.00 78.04 439.33 15 2147 2013 DCV -5157-B 2413 Sarita 4287-0016-0030; Lot 3, Bt.ock 16, E. A. Leake Addition 5,000.00 734.19 221.82 16 2148 2014DCV-4449-H 3917 Santa Elena 7685-0003-0160; Lot 16, Block 3, Santa Elena Addition 6,000.00 993.04 223.00 17 2153 2011DCV-4165-B 11833 Haven Drive 5804-0001-0050; Lot 5-A, Block I, Nueces Acres, Addition #2 5,250.00 318.34 955.77 18 2154 2012DCV-1840-H 4422 Elvira Drive 4072-0003-0080; Lot 8, Block 3, La Pascua Addition, Unit 2 3,300.00 63.22 899.36 19 2156 2013DCV-0765-B 2908 Mary Street 8409-0009-0530 & 8409-0009-0535; Lots 53 and 54, Block 9, Steele Addition 3,500.00 122.62 421.00 20 2157 2014DCV-3320-F 10317 N. Harrington 3415-0003-0115; 0.392 acre, more or less, out of Lot I1, Block 3, Highway Village Addition, Section 1 5,300.00 262.47 2,154.60 21 2162 2013DCBV-4618-A 1614 Peabody Avenue 3443-0036-0070; Lots 7 and 8, Block 36, Hillcrest Addition 2,500.00 190.26 241.58 22 2163 2014DCV-3326-C 3333 Washington Street 3232-0009-0090; Lot 9, Block 9, Harlem Park 2,000.00 42.56 374.50 23 Pulled. See below. 24 2168 2011DCV-1307-C 1707 Robin Drive 1014-0001-0220; Lot 22, Block 1, Broadmoor Park No. 3 3,000.00 27.75 117.16 25 2170 2014DCV-2777-G 3025 Greenwood 2277-0006-0220; Lot 22, Block 6, El Rey Addition 2,800.00 227.18 248.40 26 2177 2012DCV-1309-C 1514 17th Street 0481-1402-0390; Lots 39 and 40, Block 1402, Bay Terrace Addition No. 2 6,500.00 465.73 1,760.97 27 2178 2014 -DCV -2783-B 2130 Stillman Avenue 3443-0030-0160; Lots 16 and 17, Block 30, Hillcrest Addition 2,500.00 89.44 627.12 28 2187 2012DCV-1310-F 505 Osage 5000-0024-0050; Lots 5-A, Block 24, Meadow Park 5,000.00 516.52 937.74 29 2190 012DCV-5378-F 2808 Hulbirt 3443-0003-0050; The West 50 feet of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 3, Hillcrest Addition 2,500.00 108.07 185.18 30 2191 2014DCV-2775-F 2001 Van Loan Avenue 3443-0009-0010; Lots 1 and 2, Block 9, Hillcrest Addition 2,500.00 186.71 52.51 Total of Agenda Item $ 96,850 00 $ 8,213 55 $ 15 790 55 ITEMS PULLED BY THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI: 2 1801-1803 10-0683-H 301, 305 and 309 Skipper Lane 2476-0056-0719, 2476-0056-0720, & 2476-00586-0722 Lots 15, 16, and 17, Block 4, Flour Bluff Heights, unrecorded, out of Lot 8, Section 56, Flour Bluff & Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts 16,000.00 1,211.35 8,909.09 4 2021 04-7181-F 901 McIver St (@ Matlock) 2540-0016-0010; Lots I, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 16, Flour Bluff 10,000.00 1,161.33 3,557.05 5 2027 2012DCV-3185-H 1001 Green Bay Drive 2550-0001-0390; Lot 39, Block 1, Flour Bluff Point 2,000.00 167.43 30.39 23 2164 2015DCV-2875-A 446 Skipper Lane 2523-0003-0100; Lot 10, Block 3, Flour Bluff Heights 5,000.00 329.63 2,037.48 Total of Items Pulled $ 33 000 00 $ 2 869 7q 5 14.534 01 Total of Original List $ 129 850 00 $ 11 083 09 $ 30.32436 EXHIBIT B LINEBARGER GOGGAN BLAIR & SAMPSON, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 500 N. Shoreline Blvd. Suite 1111 (78401-0357) P. 0. Box 2991 Corpus Christi, TX 78403-2991 (361) 888-6898 (361) 888-4405 - FAX May 11, 2017 Ms. Constance Sanchez Director of Financial Services City of Corpus Christi POB 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 Re: Consideration of bids received for Tax Resale Properties Dear Ms. Sanchez, As you are aware, our firm represents the City of Corpus Christi in the collection of delinquent property taxes. As part of our overall effort to collect delinquent taxes in the City of Corpus Christi and the other taxing entities in Nueces County, we regularly post properties for tax sale by the Nueces County Sheriff. At the sale, if there are no bidders willing to offer the minimum opening bid amount, the property is "Struck Off" to the Nueces County taxing entities for the amount due against it. A Sheriff's Tax Deed is filed in the name of Nueces County, as Trustee for all of the taxing entities owed taxes on the property. We continue to try to sell these tax resale properties, and when we receive a purchase offer, we bring it forward to the taxing entities for their consideration and action, in accordance with the Texas Property Tax Code. Enclosed please find 30 bid analyses and maps for tax resale properties for which we have received purchase offers. The enclosed offers represent the best and highest received to date. We respectfully request that you place these offers on the City Council's agenda for the Council's consideration and action at their next available regular meeting. If the Council approves all 30 offers as submitted, the City will receive $11,083.09 in delinquent tax revenue, $30,324.36 in payment of demo and paving liens, and restore as much as $553,180.00 in taxable property value to the tax rolls. We have received multiple offers for several of these properties. If the City Council approves these offers, we will schedule a second auction of these properties with the opening bids set at the amounts approved by the taxing entities. This is the procedure we have used for many years to obtain the best results for our clients. The prospective buyers are all aware of this procedure, as it is spelled out in the terms of sale on the form which they fill out and sign to submit their offers. Please let me know as soon as possible when the meeting date is confirmed. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Elva Vela Galvan Attorney -at -Law Marvin Leary Area Manager Enclosures: 30 Bid analyses and maps for tax resale properties ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 03-1971-B; Nueces County vs Fernando Garcia, Ill 3795-0009-0050; Lot 5, Block 9, Jones Addition 1520 Mestina - Corpus Christi November 1, 2011 37,772.82 4,500.00 1,484.50 19,500.00 11.91% 23.08% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 7,305.39 583.21 City of Corpus Christi 7,892.25 630.06 Corpus Christi Independent School District 18,706.96 1,493.42 Del Mar College 3,005.71 239.95 City Paving & Demo Liens 862.51 68.86 THIS ISA VACANT LOT, 50 FTX 130 FT, LOCATED 2 BLOCKS WEST OF CITY HALL. THE CITY DEMOLISHED A FIRE -GUTTED 2 STORY ROOMING HOUSE ON THIS PROPERTY SEVERAL YEARS AGO. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS NEXTLOTS NOW, LLC OF LANCASTER, TEXAS 1737 15 r-160 II K D 70 Y � I 111 W11 mll ' bi' 11 11 6730--_------ 43751' V LUTHER ICING DRIVE 32L25" LT. 2A 0.644TAC. 310.7V 0 0 11 110' 245.69' 11 115.2' LT. 3 M 2.295 AC. 6'1 6L4=7:77 A MEW STREET CLOSED —799 ORO. #12974 ..N 11 I0 5050' 15 A 50�Tp 3� •Ied m m 150 ST. CLOSED a4 0R0.#021769 Cpt ci LT.4 =_ dESTM. '110.566 AC. 10'0E l40.41'— •I ST. 7 // ST. /ROW VARIES) 3795• c s .. , 379. / $ IV 1- !i. 12 •.,..' b.J,r„ Sib; // j1 1,3 /! N R c i ic379 --140 z £ XE MO-A- c s 4 , 379f2- 1 17£ £IV1- S•t 5.t• A.../. / $ IV 1- !i. 12 ST. JOSEPHINE "-15. ,. 10 ,B , /M ,,. -10 ,r$. P T •.,..' b.J,r„ /a // , o re ; L /! N R c i t N p 1 z c rEXEf.'PTa 3 795 10- L 15 / , is ,a n, 1t I -„ 7 I. Y 12 • O , /a // /f /! N R c s 4 s z 7 .. 3795 1 d SAM RANK/N j75# p ' ,4b i e -80 © f -60, -50 -90 , 79 CI•RA -t3(� 1 _11'9 j-120 1 .7 9- 4 3 1 1 I -„ 7 I. Y 919 4• •:'• T R c s 4 s z / R 1 49 $ ,a 711 I$ 17 Z JO SAM RANK/N j75# p ' ,4b i e -80 © f -60, -50 -90 , 79 CI•RA -t3(� 1 _11'9 j-120 1 .7 9- 4 3 1 1 �70; s -60 9 M1 —eUk /0 _' - 90 7 46 S /O -100 46 d -50 40 7 -30 f2 .100 }/ /1 2 L. 10 1• Ol 1 �Y CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CITYJ`-IALL , r AA U-17 I 1 NUECES COUNTY App 17 3 AISA DISTRICT -„ 7 I. Y 4• •:'• T `•.• 49 $ /i Z 4 0 14 9 e 7, 1 X /7, �70; s -60 9 M1 —eUk /0 _' - 90 7 46 S /O -100 46 d -50 40 7 -30 f2 .100 }/ /1 2 L. 10 1• Ol 1 �Y CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI CITYJ`-IALL , r AA U-17 I 1 NUECES COUNTY App 17 3 AISA DISTRICT ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 10-0683-H; Nueces County vs.Peter J. Clark 2476-0056-0719, 2476-0056-0720 & 2476-0056-0722; Lots 15, 16, and 17, Block 4, Flour Bluff Heights, unrecorded, out of Lot 8, Section 56, Flour Bluff & Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts 301, 305 and 309 Skipper Lane - Corpus Christi April 3, 2012 36,229.95 16,000.00 1,646.50 27,900.00 44.16% 57.35% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 2,949.92 1,168.69 City of Corpus Christi 3,057.59 1,211.35 Flour Bluff Independent School District 6,520.72 2,583.36 Del Mar College 1,214.12 481.01 City Paving & Demo Liens 22,487.60 8,909.09 A GROUP OF 3 ADJOINING VACANT LOTS , 150 FT. X 125 FT., LOCATED IN FLOUR BLUFF, EAST OF WALDRON RD., BETWEEN SPID & NAS CORPUS THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS DANIEL ABEBE OF FRIENDSWOOD, TEXAS. 1801-1803 co c) 01 TER A u-2/ G -G 01 0) rr CARL ETA AVE. N w MERZBACHER L. • r 8 1,1 4(4 , • • CD Ch g AVE. rn N Lo 0 , • NI • ' 2/Z -9c -92 t.z 0 ct N CO V E DR. • . • • z• U -2I6 —4 7VNION 3 i3 .1_1[1-713 N 30 t:i VD 13 N.) co ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 10-3474-C; Nueces County vs Diane Brady 2127-0008-0400; Lot 40, Block H, Don Patricio Subdivision 1949 Sandy Way - Corpus Christi April 3, 2012 7,353.08 4,100.00 999.50 12,841.00 55.76% 31.93% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 1,314.75 554.38 City of Corpus Christi 1,393.68 587.66 Flour Bluff Independent School District 2,847.74 1,200.78 Del Mar College 591.88 249.57 City Paving & Demo Liens 1,205.03 508.11 A VACANT RESIDENTIAL LOT, 49.2 FTX 146 FT, LOCATED IN FLOUR BLUFF OFF OF DON PATRICIO RD., BETWEEN FLOUR BLUFF DR. AND WALDRON RD. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS NEXTLOTS NOW, LLC OF LANCATER, TEXAS. 1804 ,00 2 n 0 _11 1179 J/)O7J 0 ..n .25 D v a 0 v AT O f C1/5 AV E. I-- 45.5 KN C Tv L.. _ /.3 m IV ?.s -0 r L O W - W f" W rW W W W P W J to ti -i' ,.j: ••. L-+z - 't W -C is c N < T f t m ♦4 CO r o .,.. rP N r5 N. a / 3,N 493 N w N -� N w }' N P N o yl -. 0,v A w7 --... .c.......„„„N U ,fir N }, /7 r: / o v 04 J P to n -t /* r W '' m N -NF WP o N a >`° © '� P v t'--, w rw O *a p J 0to -t. w r 4. N. .a .' t .♦' -' .'> or *t2 TO Y9 _ .74..1 N j4 u w 4, /v W W N L P to J (.3 O ti -i' 't o .[ - r to .t W -t -{t N f c c "5.1 f CO c ,y (n N0 t0 - G` N / 3,N 493 N w N -� N w }' N P N o - _° -. 0,v J ,,* --... .c.......„„„N U ,fir - w N }, /7 r: / o v 04 J P to n -t /* r W - N - i}+ mJ >r m N w o N w w - N N W )., -" -7 N (4 w 1/ -, O W f , W N O W r J W .. c W 0, N ", s r"\/ .,. e ,t - f { Y -4 W c .t V C f " .t o t -. 9. a N - o' i n 494 u N f W y --7 ..^ ,.O V 0, J ,,* 0 ., U ,fir � w - -' }, /7 r: -7. S3 Wt LLO1.,1 E 49.E Y Y W .0 WO ' CO %"' y W W ' W f W V W r 37 *. to f"-",,__, X c/ < Y W { ,�„ 2 r ./' .. 't O 4 <n o N U .. AlPo r v+ f No NJ }= o to J a, J C v v,. 1, .. r o ,C Co v n G .t G N -o- Dov E LANE _ © V 0 - b,r N w n' ✓r -F U ...+ W . ---• W J G 6 f"-",,__, 4. S V/4r 6' Y '' 'r 'F .G N / 2 r ./' y /r -F m ,0 -A v Gt o (n - 1.;. y.. t C .00 N f r W P S O J O " , C ,,r, W N .. r G V tD J T u .0 W N V• AMBER. DQ cUfr V-0 AS CP .-t - C A W - N -'-� W L /A+ r V m4 m A'' , A+ O r+ -Y N w r< .0 c C VB 4 V n Ln O GLA .. ra MU l N 0 04+ Ut J -0 w /' N ; , O ,Y S , J C N w Y - 4.3 C ,0 /' /D J C tir 'F W N .. V S A L4 NE u" J t9 N / N * 4 4 „ - Su N w t0 -F (u N W r J („ e, tP v c - N w / I 6' v f 6' !' .3 o '+t: - 50 N 0' K N U r Y V X W yu �3 ; + O .o m J C t „ L c .0 r K 47.4476' L to 9/ w _ cc H 4, I DGEJOOD DR.. a>.,„ 0 0 / J I N -7:„.„, -)-rt }1 W W to W to t4 w 5 low - C t t L c .0 r K 2 L to to Gr _ cc H 4, ,.'a „N o . ° ry H `-'/ ea t'--, o wALDQoIV FLOUQ B LV FF ENC/AI AL FAQM ' GAR c NJ sac. s5 m H r 0 c Q' r T T N n 0' m r - D P O ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 04-7181-F; Nueces County vs Ronald Lee Grant 2540-0016-0010; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 16, Flour Bluff Park 901 McIver St (@Matlock) - Corpus Christi October 7, 2014 26,487.83 10,000.00 1,259.50 39,249.00 37.75% 25.48% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 3,353.67 1,106.65 City of Corpus Christi 3,519.38 1,161.33 Flour Bluff Independent School District 7,393.50 2,439.72 Del Mar College 1,441.74 475.75 City Paving & Demo Liens 10,779.54 3,557.05 A PARCEL OF 5 ADJOINING VACANT LOTS, 261 FTX 140 FT, AT THE CORNER OF MATLOCK AND MCIVER IN FLOUR BLUFF. ACCESS IS LIMITED BY A DRAINAGE DITCH ALONG MATLOCK, AND MCIVER ST IS NOT COMPLETED TO THIS PROPERTY. IT IS ONLY A DIRT ROAD AS THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS NEXTLOTS NOW, LLC OF LANCASTER, TEXAS. 2021 0 8 O .4 9 7 9 .4 0 f0 v B .9 ,/ z 4 '5 16 *7 'e t9 Fp /( ai 15 1 Q 0 W O ' Jo '90 . LEXINGTON MI ( . 3 • 1111111111111 /20 2G V /43.10 q .2G b q IIIIIIIIIIIII 27 h° 'UM '3 ` 3 1111111011= • • 20 NMI 21 ME 11131111111 111111111111111111 4 0 ..L. Mhi :; ,It M, }' ` /14.38 W uJ 5 b /1430 / 38 t /20 2G V /43.10 q .2G b q .Z27 27 h° '3 ` 3 • • 3.8 29 4.29 /f 40 4 0 ..L. Mhi :; ,It 3o /6 47 :i 3/ :i r 6 :,. 3/ l r ,.w 13 az 8 • ' 33 4.. ..- 9 ;: � 44. 34 37 r. 0 39 20 .. /0 35 44 // , 'Al {{ 2.2 X`g ii 36 1.2. 23 37 S /3 • 3.9 /4 40 0 � �39 i("ii /10 /S V 43 TO . /G `' \ 4/ 1 44 20 L , 4s /7is 2 / ,', \4Z /a43 4? , e 70 ' 70 2.3 \ .: 4.8�#� /9 .,,, : 44 ; • t 20 A " 45 :'t 2/ 99 •+ 70` J' - 'L 17 18 0 1 423 24 49 yO°i Zj 7'' h Fo ./44.7 ^� /46.03. 0 W uJ 5 b /3. , t N ' 38 t /20 2G V ,$ 2" .. 27 h° /4 ` 28 ` 1 1 29 /f 40 4 0 ..L. Mhi 0iO3,5.' ,It /6 47 :i 3/ 4/ r .32 /7 �.; 42 l /e 13 .- /o • 35 q .. 4.. . /9 � 44. , 37 0 39 20 .. 45 ,I/ 44 20 , 'Al {{ 2.2 X`g ii 47 \ 23 48 S Rt 1,49 " 4 .25 40 0 4 /10 ' //o V U2I7 E' J'TPELT ,e. v /40 / .1 /20 2G V ,$ 2" .. 27 h° 3 2 28 g 29 530 is ,It 6 I :i 3/ 4/ .32 8 ; q 33 9 -: .- /o • 35 4.. . .. 30 * / 37 1.7 39 /4 /6 20 , 'Al , 43 \ � /6 4/ t 2z " 47 /7 92 /8 3d 43 79 '• as /9 1 44 20 L , 4s 2 / ,', 46 zz 4? , e 70 ' 70 2.3 4.8�#� .,,, v 24 ; • t , 49 A "o 25 :'t 40 /fa •+ 70` J' - 'L ,os Ito ,a .1 ,,,.•21 so i ,$ Z 2 /1 39 1: is 40 /4 . 4/ t 1 -: (7 • 42 t /8 43 /9 44 20 : , 43 2/ � 40 2z " 47 z1 48 i 3d 79 a as .so 1 V/40 ' /4x.22 `� J3LV._D 1.4 Qt 5 W w 30 NUECES COUNTY A'PPRAISAL DISTRICT 6796 I6A FLOUR BLU ANO ENCINAL FAQ/1 AND GARDE) TQACTS LOT AO SECTION 47 .rcALL Zo ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2012DCV-3185-H; Nueces County vs Vera D. Buchanan 2550-0001-0390; Lot 39, Block 1, Flour Bluff Point 1001 Green Bay Dr. - Corpus Christi November 4, 2014 27,538.09 2,000.00 1,229.50 31,033.00 7.26% 6.44% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 5,700.21 159.49 City of Corpus Christi 5,984.15 167.43 Flour Bluff Independent School District 12,241.63 342.51 Del Mar College 2,526.10 70.68 City Paving & Demo Liens 1,086.00 30.39 A DECREPIT HOUSE, 672 SQ FT, ON A 50 FTX 100 FT LOT, LOCATED IN FLOUR BLUFF JUST OFF SPID BETWEEN WALDRON RD. AND FLOUR BLUFF DR. THE PROSPECTIVE BUYER HAS STATED HIS INTENTION TO DEMOLISH THE EXISTING HOUSE, WHICH IS IN VERY POOR CONDITION. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS NEXTLOTS NOW, LLC OF LANCASTER, TEXAS. 2027 U216,F tiTLoct ST 2-040 4 30 I 31, ; 20 • 32. I•if 19 • : 3.5 1 t I f 37 • : JO I, • .10 • • t 0 t 9 8 7 &! o„ .ro 4 2.- A goioo4.4t, FLOUR 5LUF F E NCI NAL FAQ.tl 4 GAQDEN TRs ti EC. 4-7 _7t.,rn IT 14 — MAY20 c•o 2 4444 I o•-••oo-oi 7 - 0. •53 MARINE 40 0 ..t 7I ..so b ":1'''' 9 . - _ /r.• kits - 40 ri 490 0 sa...- o -t .4-0 (...--\ • - Jo 11' 01417. 40 kg Q 1 GS AO .844 4C• -42 0 Acs 40 ; " 1 r 01061 - 743 -1-. UJ 0 (y.• O 74 34/ 1 I • 6 0 N,k J0 13 14 .53.46 1" h4., .00 17 10 19 S T 40 to 74.34 0 25 2, 74.34 DE -MA 40 8 7 '1 2 50- 4 • 3 50 J0 427 9 2- 40 /0 0 0. -1; 9 40 t• .S•t .5d 40 .50 - .. \ 0 (y.• .. 74 34/ , N,k -117 -13- It IS 16 11 /0 19 2.o 2.1 \VP. ....e, ,. i/----. ,6 , -.......-- ) el d 4551.fr qd sn4 nni f -la- _.0 - - - _ - . _so -V. I.I. 1 ..5 0 - -JO- - 10 - - cf. - 4 Z.. X i. 4 3 2 t .,. , ••• .. ; zii 2;2 ;,' 4 ts 25 Vog r—i, 15:11 9 ro• 1 0 1, !I 4 Jo .so .. . 32, 43c1. so 30 5001 Jac] 70.0 SO. "PA D 12 E_ !SLAW) DR PLO viz. LUf F U21713 0 CENTET2, •S0 co /410 N0o2. 2.1 2.0 19 1 /40 i7 1.9 /goat& I 13 12- i 10 Ve 7 .31 131 \_00 focit4P* •34 AC -2702 4- , 3 3. 0 17 5!!..` 894 AC 2476-47-270 4,60 u -2I 7 B, 20 1 ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2011DCV-2148-G; Nueces County vs Minnie Tinkle 8284-0010-0225; The East 1/2 of Lot 22 and the West 6.0 feet of Lot 23, Block 10, Southmoreland Addition 140 Watson - Corpus Christi February 4, 2014 13,926.28 1,250.00 1,236.50 5,424.00 8.98% 23.05% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 557.62 0.54 City of Corpus Christi 611.24 0.59 Corpus Christi Independent School District 1,413.61 1.37 Del Mar College 245.53 0.24 City Paving & Demo Liens 11,098.28 10.76 A VACANT LOT, 31 FTX 140 FT, LOCATED 5 BLOCKS SOUTH OF DEL MAR COLLEGE EAST CAMPUS, OFF OF AYERS ST. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS NEXTLOTS NOW, LLC OF LANCASTER, TEXAS 2103 9 g 150 IR 2 t° 3 4 5 6 1 7 8 U-65 C 011 FGE U-60 /I15 WT I Ci -IM PU3 EDWARDS so 12"/I' 11 10 9 8 7 0 6 5 4 3 2 50 I k 0 , c.: 1/3 50 /4 /5 /6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 k 24' So TARLETON 50 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 so I g e.,t1 4 kt1 1-f. 13A /o0 14_ / 16 /7 0 /8 19 20 2/ 22 23 N t's ti 24' 50 4138 50 148 50 BLEVINS 50 P, /2 1/ 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 So A d' ,_ a 50 14_ / 15 16 17 /8 19 0 21 0 22 23 (2 24 50 RICHARD so / 0: 12 11 00 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 \2 so A I.,,,•: CO 11 10 9 8 0 6 5 4 3 2 1 , -13-14- a ,,, so 8284 15 16 /7 /8 19 20 21 22 23 24 so C L EMMER 5o 112 11 10 9 8 10 7 14 15 16 17 18 11° /9 WATSON so , 1 50 2 3 n os z 4 .. . 5 1.: I:Z310 ' 6 8 9 10 11 so v. 12; so ':1 STREET so 4 11 /0 9 8 7 6 5 4 0 3 50 o 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 , 8284 - 0 t. ,..i 13 14 15 16 17 18 /9 20 21 22 23 t.: *)13 /4 15 /6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 50 so .50 60 STREET 50 o; ".1 "12 11 /0 9 8 7 6 5 4 0 3 50 2 60 k 113 so 14 15 /6 0 17 18 t4 \ 21 22 23 so k 24,. 00 8284 - ,® ,..i 13 14 15 16 17 18 /9 20 21 22 23 Sit '13 so 14 15 \./ 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 so 24 .60 so 50 42 STREET ...)so iN. 12 IV 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 .so 2 40 to Ds 1 ' 113 so 14 15 /6 0 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 so k 24,. 00 STREET so 1/ 10 9 8 7 0 6 5 4 3 so 6o Z,12 II 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 t4 8284 - et 0 Sit '13 so 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 so 24 .60 STREET so g `$12 1/ 10 9 8 7 0 6 5 4 3 So 2 60 1 .. 13 so 14 /5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 A -23-24— B 50 A k B? e.,o STREET L42 3 4 5 .07 8 9 10 11 012; /1 12 CO /3 /50 0 +s 15 //5 ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due AH Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2012DCV-4402-F, Nueces County vs Jose Atkinson 2486-0008-0038; Tract E of Lot 3, Block H, Flour Bluff Estates 329 Picture Ct. - Corpus Christi August 5, 2014 3,750.71 1,500.00 610.64 7,128.00 39.99% 21.04% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 803.94 190.63 Nueces County Education District City of Corpus Christi 846.69 200.77 Flour Bluff Independent School District 1,744.51 413.65 Del Mar College 355.57 84.31 A VACANT LOT, 50 FT BY 88 FT, LOCATED IN FLOUR BLUFF, EAST OF WALDRON RD., BETWEEN SPID AND NAS CORPUS CHRISTI. THE LOT HAS NO STREET FRONTAGE; PICTURE COURT HAVING NEVER BEEN COMPLETED. THE BUYER OWNS THE ADJACENT LOT ON MIRROR CT. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS JOHN & HELEN BEARD OF CORPUS CHRISTI 2110 GATE V,, ‘2. IG FLOUQ I3LU F F ENCINAL FAR2tI GAQDEP TQ. •PEC. 56 100 0, 1 1 15 6/96 U 2/6,T welt I" 100 .T2ELT 56 AL ( 19 a /00 zo /00 710 51 28 0 KU! DE tom, .5505 P ti, t'• r/43O 300 1-E to 3e-'3 3o A ,16 2EPIL.AT /0 5, ( 1/8 So Ptcr 35 5 50 E -254 -255 • F. L EED1-AT•. 243 O 032 T--244 PLAT f IVa 70 3.) 500• yea . 2c. .50 -234Qr /05 F -235 3 e 75 0 228 .,7223• 5117 310 7.5 UE. -190 21 ei(A " - 18 /9 .20 A n 115 41 n 3y D .36 AZ �a4C 35 4e PL3aA7 '1 60 2 T. DEO. r �y3i 0 .yb ` rt LG - 50 %int so -ani. 1 r�0 „y :2`669 SAA o, �e -Z „z5*a 13 �� ,2r' 37 . 1/0 8-70 I� A m -8,84 143 137.00' p_ 9A • 0.755 AC ve o1 12' 6 130126 1 00 72 -74 76 t5 G -75;02 .r to 11 `ty0 12 /So 113 -1.\ sit 9- 01) vo 1 1)t 50 A ANE. 110 40' 1.7 tI 2+-A0 .2 - 6 0 roo 21 Io3 100 100 Dt2,IVE 00 23 0 I is /.5- 7. s e r. 33 Q 70 g 3.2 ,no Gl 31 r 30 $ 0 29 z8 230 3 24.5 — - �..zI 100 E ai9 IL3 113 ,210 15.3 ,VA 5,5 325 5 16. 17. 8 19� /�7 1s ri" U ZI?A U217 A .50 to (1 zr 26 24- 23 4 12 0 • 23 22 21 ,19•,0 18 17 16 15 a raa " r3� 50 -540 5 .ta DQ. /00 2Q h / a5 to 25a :a 410 100 z 40 .603 39 4 38 3 37 6 .3‘ 34- 8 / 33A ✓ n 3.2 29 1a 215 14• 2.7 (5 26 -116 25 17 2.4. 18 2.0 28 4 loo 21 50 zz, PARK 7 14- GV W U-21€ 64"51 HUMBLE TO TOLL GATE E PADRE 2SLAN° CADS EWA' NIIFCF5 COUNTY AFPRA SAI DISTRICT 2 /l0 ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2011DCV-2152-H; Nueces County vs V.L. Houston, II 6403-0003-0140 and 6103-0003-0145; Lot 14, Block C, Parker Addition 1416 San Juan - Corpus Christi November 4, 2014 22,805.37 1,150.00 449.00 5,400.00 5.04% 21.30% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 1,699.29 52.23 City of Corpus Christi 1,888.48 58.05 Corpus Christi Independent School District 4,121.85 126.70 Del Mar College 822.05 25.27 City Paving & Demo Liens 14,273.70 438.75 THIS ISA VACANT LOT, 50 FTX 135 FT, LOCATED 2 BLOCKS SOUTH OF WEST BROADWAY @ NORTH STAPLES ST., IN "THE CUT". THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS NEXTLOTS NOW, LLC OF LANCASTER, TEXAS 2111 Parebv NO R rN-- s Q 90 o� o • VP.4* 4t* -r TANCAHUA 9 STREET i1 Y i ; b ;}�iIltil tI ;mit fit t lit 1 1 1 t t Nwlt.l -35-20 U.S. H W ): NO. 181 NORTH BROADWAY ' r t ;- 1 1 11 1 1 1 I f I I ilfll 1 a % +.� 0 N t Cu 4 (4 O1 a 0 so `a ' o `\ so STREET i1 Y i ; b ;}�iIltil tI ;mit fit t lit 1 1 1 t t Nwlt.l -35-20 U.S. H W ): NO. 181 NORTH BROADWAY ' r t ;- 1 1 11 1 1 1 I f I I ilfll 1 ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2012DCV-2287-G; Nueces County vs Page C. Gray, Jr. 2780-0002-0170; Lot 17, Block 2, Subdivision of the Geistman Tract 929 Louis Lynch Dr. - Corpus Christi February 2, 2016 18,549.73 2,700.00 1,778.50 5,548.00 14.56% 48.67% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 802.13 39.85 City of Corpus Christi 910.81 45.25 Corpus Christi Independent School District 1,947.60 96.75 Del Mar College 403.54 20.05 City Paving & Demo Liens 14,485.65 719.61 A VACANT LOT, 50 FTX 135.55 FT, LOCATED JUST OFF THE 11-1-37 SOUTH ACCESS ROAD NEAR UP RIVER ROAD. THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DEMOLISHED A SUB -STANDARD HOUSE ON THIS PROPERTY SEVERAL YEARS AGO. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS NEXTLOTS NOW, LLC OF LANCASTER, TEXAS 2133 oP c c a -7VS'IdaddV AAN1 ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2011DCV-0854-H; Nueces County vs Adan Castellano 8724-0010-0120; Lot 12, Block 10, Temple Addition 3810 Sarita - Corpus Christi March 1, 2016 24,116.20 8,000.00 2,777.50 6,074.00 33.17% 131.71% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 2,749.90 595.51 City of Corpus Christi 3,127.37 677.25 Corpus Christi Independent School District 6,628.77 1,435.50 Del Mar College 1,366.50 295.92 City Paving & Demo Liens 10,243.66 2,218.32 A VACANT RESIDENTIAL LOT, 52 FTX 93.45 FT, LOCATED 2 BLOCKS EAST OF CROCKETT ELEMENTARY AND MARTIN MIDDLE SCHOOL. THS OFFER IS MADE BY THE NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR TO THIS PROPERTY. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS ROBERT VALDEZ, JR. OF 3810 SARITA, CORPUS CHRISTI. 2134 GREENWOOD DRIvE 449.55 3415 0 11 ffi "15.46 r y 7Vd1 7OOH7S 113M3Oa7 41 11 55 N 55 W a N C Z QO J V 55 t0 55 6151 v N So N O 4 00 r w Co PRE SCOTT 60 .9 .> _.S2 50 b 50 9 5, 00 V '0 50 5e 50 r, tei 40 55 N 55 55 55 50 O 50 w 42 S 5:115 55 tCo ". 35 35 MCARTHUR STREET a N CoI CD1O 52 S V 52 35 r••• . W IV -11. 35_ toR 44 SARITA 40 M N l:0 NAiliiiii ®111 A Q 11 �f 1 f2.1 •x'r 32 6151 v N So N O 4 00 r w Co PRE SCOTT 60 .9 .> _.S2 50 b 50 9 5, 00 V '0 50 5e 50 r, tei 40 55 N 55 55 55 50 O 50 w 42 S 5:115 55 tCo ". 35 35 MCARTHUR STREET a N CoI CD1O 52 S V 52 35 r••• . W IV -11. 35_ toR 44 SARITA 40 M N l:0 52 Y 5.1 O N W 32 55 co p `. 40 N 57 W 52 a to O 62 V 32 R coO G 35 40 REYNOSA ses g0 5.1 5e t0 N 5a m sa V vs O0 a 5. yes B E RTRAM 150 C O t0 N 155 W V - 9.oa 0g 4 h N IAGARA BETEL N n O STREET 40 ; 63 'zi 52 40 illogii -„,... N St W A to 52 55 00 t W v 01 Zi-, A W 03 •- -- o R. -. N W A to 0 V Co t0 t.. 40 5t 52 55 40 BETEL N n O STREET 40 ; 63 'zi -cii 40 illogii -„,... N St W A to jC0Pli O V111 St Sa STREET I i i I 1 l i I ) -sL R— T N 50 _ W 55 O 55 55 to 55 53 W 55 5,11 N 54.93 ▪ 475 a Jo a w V to co A to W 50 5757 N 57+[. CO m ti z to •i 00 m m 8 „ E t -75y k 57 STREET 57 A So W' 550 N N (� 9 b 8 V 8 50 N 50 .C. 57 W it •. 57 N 35 W b a to 0 N 03 b S 50 .:: So N M St STREET 62 8 t 30 8 N N - V N 8 V 8 4,- .50 ii 57 G`I R ' �' 57 � 50 - - v, - a Co ` m O_ N tP O z..,- Se NS 57 STREET 07 PA 55. W N N. V t0 m V m N 5e A 57 Cit =- R.. 57 NW('_�a 50 - - v, - ----0--------- tN o 0) N CO X 10 O 0 50 NR 57 N STREET 57 kN as W N A N Cif 6 b W V Of - N 50 fi 62 Wn -. n s> N 5. CO a to 01 N CO b "O 9� VS SJlt r FR Y 11 y ` 't ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2012DCV-0822-A; Nueces County vs Clyde Coleman, Jr. 8013-0004-0120; Lot 12-A, Block 4, Shoreline Park 2214 Kennedy Ave - Corpus Christi March 1, 2016 17,852.04 2,500.00 1,655.50 4,750.00 14.00% 52.63% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 1,905.60 90.15 City of Corpus Christi 2,156.13 102.00 Corpus Christi Independent School District 4,619.86 218.54 Del Mar College 956.34 45.24 City Paving & Demo Liens 8,214.11 388.57 A VACANT LOT, 59.38 FTX 100 FT, NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF KENNEDY AND W BROADWAY, IN THE HILLCREST NEIGHBORHOOD. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS PORT OF CORPUS CHRISTI AUTHORITY OF NUECES COUNTY. 2135 1 :MPT 13-27-150 iY DEMPSE Y AVE. If 2y v Ze 3 2/ 443- 20 /9 N n A. P 2 0f 4.4,C43- AAAC / Ii B 2 l e13f J 5 4 7 0 ,.► s'0 .r 2 t AVE 491 -0a --+O VIEW 6 A RA Y ({ Z/ Z3 22 111111 491 -0a --+O VIEW 6 A RA Y ({ Z/ Z3 22 1„ ra 0 � rr /9 4 , w AP 7 (. /7 K d M rJ /) 0 f {2 i a X14 ♦1' 25 /2 n / Z /1 — 7 4 4 N ./r /2 /2 h /0 / to / 2 J 4 s 32 e 9 o 0 2 w d e c : e 7 R 4 t 4 k t- 7 Es MJ rs Mfr K J 4 9 ft /3 /0 A 04 1S n // ./r /2 /2 h /0 / / A 9 q � 2 J o 7 w d e 3 e 7 h JJ 4 t 4 k t- 7 ./1 0 //S J o•i 2 32— 2EFLAi —A n CEMETERY TRACT 1-Q /f4 gf BROADWAY 4/95 :;3911—u 5.1 7 a. i44tR0 .1,,.r JJ.JoJJJJ.ro KENNEDY .. — o J.1 a' J, JO J. JO P J.JO AVE. ./r /2 A .rr / 1: / // A z q ii J o 7 w R e a e /.0,.0. h JJ d 5- S k 7\I 7 :` 0 i J o•i 2 32— 2EFLAi —A n CEMETERY TRACT 1-Q /f4 gf BROADWAY 4/95 :;3911—u 5.1 7 a. i44tR0 .1,,.r JJ.JoJJJJ.ro KENNEDY .. — o J.1 a' J, JO J. JO P J.JO AVE. AVE h uJ // ns /z h° /(S / /0 / // 5 z q � d J o 7 w A 151 C 15 1 . 1 £n ,/Yt J512S 40.9 , � /.0,.0. ti AVE h a3 2 r.l.s A /(S / n t P, // // A SCJ 2 q 55..17 /0 p yAID, 0;0 Mi* 1 J w A 151 C 15 1 . 1 £n ,/Yt J512S d i'00- r3i , � ti d 5- t ti 7\I 4 :` J nt .v AVE 4 //3 t r.l.s A I 22.1 B P, // /e A SCJ 1 � I B 0ZT 55..17 EXEMPT p yAID, 0;0 Mi* 1 rrz /2J- 0 w A 151 C 15 1 . 1 £n ,/Yt J512S d i'00- r3i , 3 Si 4 710 i6 ti 4 ti tl C C\1"10 3- /oe'O lrrr J h /00 .; 2 .(J / r. 6 p�J o /r V C/ I 2 3— 2 P, // /a J > 6 55..17 EXEMPT p yAID, 0;0 Mi* 1 s w A 151 C 15 1 . 1 £n ,/Yt J512S 2 G ./5 , 113 1-: J) 3 $ 7 //1 H 0../0 /2 51.01 1 f0A, 1 4. I P, // f 5-5J7 I 55..17 EXEMPT -5.100J (�g�} 9 1 .4 e d ti k 7 0 d -A 2 9 3 111.5 A /0 ,452:44 0; s240' L A .ao BROADWAY U-96 3262-1-10 200_ R LPtAT p1-1 t_ 7 777 & L A 7 /r. 4 ,Sk -1'3. 13 ST. 5.4.U. 8 6 -R. R. -0-161 5240-0460 MISCEL. NEOUS ACREAGE (GeaerJ .474er/cars 77 -Jo Comp.' WASHINGTON ST. 235 U—I5 NUECES COyNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2013DCV-3283-B; Nueces County vs Ramon Castro Abrege, 3775-0000-0030; Lot 3 Jasmin Addition 532 19th St. - Corpus Christi March 1, 2016 5,980.17 1,000.00 2,974.50 7,256.00 16.72% 13.78% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 861.88 City of Corpus Christi 986.83 _ Corpus Christi Independent School District 2,104.61 ' Del Mar College 432.95 City Paving & Demo Liens 1,593.90 A SMALL SHOTGUN STYLE HOUSE, 528 SQ FT, ON A NARROW LOT, 25 FTX 128 FT, LOCATED ACROSS 19TH ST. FROM LAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. THE HOUSE IS IN POOR CONDITION REQUIRING COMPLETE REFURBISHING TO MAKE IT HABITABLE. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS ALAN QUERIDO OF CORPUS CHRISTI. 2136 4625-I: '-5G j--5 U-18 AG NES LAWNViE w Fa ANNEX '."444 4272-0- 15 LOT 1 ' 4 t� zsa.as� 11� 49.2 STREET 3515- co 1 5 LAWNVIEW 4272-0-20 LOT 2A 4t42 a is q 2. 1- 4 20 - ARY a. ST. JOSEPHS CHURCH TRACT EXEMPT -14-10 4625-10- 100 12_�O TS 2 ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 10-3487-G; Nueces County vs Maria C. Benavides 1585-0005-0270; Lot 27, Block 5, Second Revision of Chula Vista Addition No.1 1725 Hudson - Corpus Christi April 5, 2016 50,780.00 10,000.00 1,944.50 127,235.00 19.69% 7.86% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 8,018.97 1,272.09 City of Corpus Christi 9,364.74 1,485.58 Corpus Christi Independent School District 19,911.54 3,158.67 Del Mar College 4,073.12 646.14 City Paving & Demo Liens 9,411.63 1,493.02 A HOUSE, ORIGINALLY BUILT IN 1956, WITH A 2ND STORY ADDITION IN 2007. IT IS A SHELL ONLY, NO INTERIOR FINISH, JUST BARE WALL STUDS. THE LOT IS 50 FTX 121 FT, LOCATED NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF GREENWOOD & HORNE RD., JUST AROUND THE CORNER FROM CHULA VISTA THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS ALAN QUERIDO OF CORPUS CHRISTI. 2144 0 O y stnai454 -,� u A D n DAD 1 IR I a m f _ A . m a D 33 C° "' � ass v : N u Oi4 w j M i a .I I n i. I by .{I'/ PAL X INSON 9..y x Y N w� S ,O O 00 In -5 ST. N m i m W I+ b m A DRIVE N w Jt SHAW N 1 1 W iI v I: m O V m STR EET 4. '5 t ., aJ55 jN w t $a 44 ♦UI Rm tV 33 C° 553 mr1[6' 5 Ei:' b [:' v ,•"y 6 3 '' as Stu lA 6 nsy 8 pio ,�, tot vY m� a .w N 1 y :0 - GA T 0 - CAST S37V /OW H m m 4 r o '! ap" J I CP.„ A i 1 s... ;4) "N ST. P`1 (3 b ° m BER NANOINO•;'•• S' 4 m m 1V` t TMN m CO O 8' zm O 51 5 L O m SHAW Q PRESCOTT STREET C 1*w pA ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2011DCV-1435-F; Nueces County vs Gavino Rivera 3443-0022-0130; Lots 13 and 14, Block 22, Hillcrest Addition 1322 Stillman Ave - Corpus Christi May 3, 2016 26,527.68 2,500.00 1,711.50 5,200.00 9.42% 48.08% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 2,339.81 69.55 City of Corpus Christi 2,625.60 78.04 Corpus Christi Independent School District 5,622.16 167.11 Del Mar College 1,159.47 34.46 City Paving & Demo Liens 14,780.64 439.33 A VACANT LOT, 50 FTX 140 FT, AT THE CORNER OF STILLMAN AND HULBIRT IN THE HILLCREST NEIGHBORHOOD. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS PORT OF CORPUS CHRISTI AUTHORITY OF NUECES COUNTY. 2146 STI L LMAN s. (110 *LK) a.a KENNEDY 24 34 13 22 2/ 10 /1 •0 /a /4 d ., Kr `/ X 2 s5 3 4 3443— 71 ,f 1 4 s• ,f 7 al a 9 1/ 1/ 15 n,x 11 as 4..044) (1 1,g+o�, t1 11 1, 11 1t It t It b / f• / a 2$ 4 S 38 Q a 9 .141E •1t, /: S z' J 4 /n d` H • w+t .1..y t /sots - 7 �.� { i til ` : I.1t Nie /.1: .1 a _�`1 /201.4:- • (// t ,o I\ ' ...$1,1 AVE NUE I1 2{Z3Y22t 11 11 41 t1 .4'r sf ,1; 11 I .• 4 y-� a1 t /7 *5 K at t1 1"4t/f/1` .7X -! 3 41 . /1 O S. f• / a LC.RES.T. s Q T .141E •1t, /a w / z' J 4 3 G 7 d` „ S ..4/� a 421..,> . . . . 11 ai if a4 0 s al rt H ,t ll Sr 3443 24-10 AVENUE 271. 35 h2 — CROSSLEY SCHOOL TRACT; t. I EXEMPT 1 t (2.3241) ,N 1986-0000-0000 t`' 441 tt 1 1/ 177.74 /• 184 H w lF t1 O3�r/s a i� n al Vit(. •\ /4 4 170 EW!NG iv c TRACT tri' u C 6 2628-f• K iv 2 f• / a LC.RES.T. s Q T .141E •1t, /a w 9 D. So P p•. 1• 7 •z f. LEXINGTON 1Rt /1/ PORT (e.. etc) • a If 3t 13 XS 11 IS t1 It 2+a n al Vit(. •\ /4 4 170 11 it . /7 K at . IS 1f 0 X 4 I{ I.CL LC.RES.T. s c e 9° 12 b .. .2 14 11 11 rf 11 O 11 „ S a t1 ,l 11 I1 11 41 11 11 R 11 If it if TJ a. H, I.CL LC.RES.T. MOORE- MOM r � T. 12 b 34 In 1 36 6 9 /e ei •2 Isl..-Pi" t b A'D p._ . . . . BAY VIEW CEMETERY STREET STREET as SIS 1,S 11.E it.f ,• ` dlig !-' S 9 l0 6557- Z IiIE.,: log w S N { w ; 11 ‘ /1f • MOORE- MOM r � 1 s S as f. 15 /6 • 1• t /9 z 20 w 2/ w 22 r STREET as SIS 1,S 11.E it.f ,• ` dlig !-' S 9 l0 100 4,43 AVENUE A •s,. H•1.733 8 3 1 1f•) 6290 .3.10 'PA R Ki 1 t f- (2f1. lI) 1 C ID r Naa Ictal JP Av..11 I I I 11 14.1.0- i �✓ 3292 `.3 -8-9I' a1 Na /0 r 1• 2 3 ti 7 0t -7-Ib/ • n LEARY ST \\\\\ NUECE S COUNTY APPRAIAL DISTRICT 6557- IiIE.,: log „, 1r.S ♦,1 11 ‘ /1f s.„( ,,,. itf MOORE- MOM r � 100 4,43 AVENUE A •s,. H•1.733 8 3 1 1f•) 6290 .3.10 'PA R Ki 1 t f- (2f1. lI) 1 C ID r Naa Ictal JP Av..11 I I I 11 14.1.0- i �✓ 3292 `.3 -8-9I' a1 Na /0 r 1• 2 3 ti 7 0t -7-Ib/ • n LEARY ST \\\\\ NUECE S COUNTY APPRAIAL DISTRICT ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2013DCV-5157-B; Nueces County vs Pablo R. Garcia 4287-0016-0030; Lot 3, Block 16, E. A. Leake Addition 2413 Sarita - Corpus Christi May 3, 2016 8,828.04 5,000.00 1,520.50 35,281.00 56.64% 14.17% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 1,613.52 635.96 City of Corpus Christi 1,862.75 734.19 Corpus Christi Independent School District 3,974.62 1,566.56 Del Mar College 814.36 320.97 City Paving & Demo Liens 562.79 221.82 A DECREPIT COTTAGE, 576 SQ FT, ON A 50 FTX 125 FT LOT, LOCATED 2 BLOCKS WEST OF CROSSTOWN EXPRESSWAY BETWEEN MORGAN AND THE HOUSE IS IN VERY POOR CONDITION AND REQUIRES A TOTAL RE-BULD TO MAKE IT HABITABLE. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS RAMON G. CASAREZ OF CORPUS CHRISTI. 2147 1. 0 r0 u a 99Z ON AVA41-19 II-/ 3.1V1S ..... ...... 13.4 1. DW//V M9-4 -SO . pt ,,,,,c4„,,” • . to N 4 4 N k .. it,;'• - •• '1,4.. 0 • `. '.'; ‘1'‘ ) 4 , C N. ,, ... l 1, FRAIVC/ • 11 44' N rz i,. u a .. it,;'• a •• '1,4.. ,., k I • `. '.'; ‘1'‘ t D. •41.- ni`r• a C •-.(D --- ‘1‘‘ SEGRE•sr • 44' " 'I I 8 c") • I•• • k i Q 'i:x1 • •• '1,4.. tt))4 I ;‘ "a‘ NI*1‘ t D. •41.- 829 9*5-t0 BV!D. •,"..--f-L ,i f-...',;"-Iva- 4. .u -..., 1 k • I•• • k 4. 4 , „., ,, 1 .'N :sar • ni`r• a C •-.(D --- Ls, -. --i t •it tl, iit k u Y.4.-- k Ik 4 N ts. Z' '41 ,, 1 .'N :sar • : ,z! k''' a I1 • 4 1% . • k u Y.4.-- k Ik 4 N ts. Z' '41 ,, 1 .'N :sar • (J)N sr ''' '4‘ \ -r• ... t N 4 .0. •c.... k .. ,4 NI> N. "I• 0 % 1 I ,' _1* 1,,0. 1- .0 ‘,.. >. I .... - ST /0 4f Nil , /,,i 1 -,5 4: k .. ,4 4 N. "I• 0 co - -.. •,7 f '.. I Of ' sr t • x .... ,.., ,---,.„ a . -,5 4: k N N. "I• N "-•1., /31 ..., 1 Arf sr 0 c ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2014DCV-4449 H; Nueces County vs Gilberto Ramirez 7685-0003-0160; Lot 16, Block 3, Santa Elena Addition 3917 Santa Elena - Corpus Christi May 3, 2016 17,461.71 6,000.00 1,362.50 34,739.00 34.36% 17.27% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 3,222.61 855.86 City of Corpus Christi 3,739.11 993.04 Corpus Christi Independent School District 8,042.94 2,136.05 Del Mar College 1,617.38 429.55 City Paving & Demo Liens 839.67 223.00 A RAMSHACKLE WOOD FRAME HOUSE, 792 SQ FT, ON A 40 FTX 103 FT LOT, LOCATED 2 BLOCKS EAST OF THE DEL MAR COLLEGE WEST CAMPUS. THE HOUSE WILL REQUIRE A COMPLETE REFURBISHING THROUGHOUT TO MAKE IT HABITABLE. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS RAMON G. CASAREZ OF CORPUS CHRISTI. 2148 5 O b AIRPORT 11111111111111111 wee IRE ROI MUMmonmaimUMWMIMEligNa 0BEE 'M Wenti man MEE GUATE ti 021N ST, N anata V 4 Ell EOM m 01.34 4 41.34 EMU swat ®© EN ME® s ROAD SIM Min 00 1131 IMMO Woon v 4 4 b MIN i z ri1 BALBOA STREET 11111111111111 PUEBLO H fi m o +`a oQm Y „hr ; 4 Iltt a 11131111111111111 HIAWATHA STREET Mar EIV 11111111111 ���tfAG m SHAWNEE 0 N m MENNEE EV 11311111131 IMILAENMEIMICE 111111,22 4 sum sem moo SEP 1111111111111110. 1111111111 44-cr Ni 1 MIL +-i ST, Nilf£9 oAjcwAcs C • NPt VIRGINIA AVE, 7 ir ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2011DCV-4165-B; Nueces County vs Juanita Castillo 5804-0001-0050; Lot 5-A, Block 1, Nueces Acres Addition #2 11833 Haven Dr. - Corpus Christi July 5, 2016 39,739.70 5,250.00 2,749.50 15,310.00 13.21% 34.29% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 5,267.73 331.46 City of Corpus Christi 5,059.21 318.34 Calallen Independent School District 12,258.16 771.31 Del Mar College 1,964.87 123.63 ,City Paving & Demo Liens 15,189.73 955.77 THIS PROPERTY IS A VACANT RESIDENTIAL LOT, 91 FT BY 101 FT, LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF HAVEN DR. AND VIOLET RD. IN CALALLEN ISD. THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DEMOLISHED A SUB -STANDARD HOUSE ON THIS LOT SEVERAL YEARS AGO. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS NEXTLOTS NOW, LLC OF LANCASTER, TEXAS 2153 YSIYddV ° , 00 00 "0 00 '0 400 00 ........ —7 • ciO4,9." lg:4; o 0 a• +.4 tr 0 , !! 300. P • no, r — t z 13.00 DE WIDGEON RIVE -00000:00 .4,-. :00!0 '0 1'7.“ 00 . I • 4011-1.irth i 1 7 ' ; . 7 t;• .0 10"..0 0••010:01,2:o a ,alo :o co• GS t C" S 0 04'W /038.80 (1) CO 0517340 5 It ; 41, 14, 6 1,1 0' 0 I Ci;,7E.)',llid "11r; j. 001,000, / srmrr, • O'OrE 0/02.07' ,61A = 00000 ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2012DCV-1840-H; Nueces County vs Mariselda Hernandez. 4072-0003-0080; Lot 8, Block 3, La Pascua Addition, Unit 2 4422 Elvira Dr. - Corpus Christi July 5, 2016 13,675.87 3,300.00 2,101.50 8,663.00 24.13% 38.09% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 618.05 54.16 City of Corpus Christi 721.37 63.22 West Oso Independent School District 1,759.05 154.16 Del Mar College 314.92 27.60 City Paving & Demo Liens 10,262.48 899.36 THIS PROPERTY ISA VACANT RESIDENTIAL LOT, 50 FTX 105 FT, LOCATED IN THE MOLINA NEIGHBORHOOD IN WEST OSO ISD. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS NEXTLOTS NOW, LLC OF LANCASTER, TEXAS 2154 141 1. , : . 0 a ELVIRA Jo .10 .. .' a - o` 4 JO 4 it • `+ 11, iN i . u o y o : k k w 4 a ,4 ., as '0 4 V C c 4 V w h w V > V O - Y t:• fi h n 4 hV e v w 4 f 1• Y t p ' s ' v w 4 0 4 k a o V 4 .. ,• JO JO V n tt 7. 4 M t. y 4 O• ..Y,' .4. y 4 •' + O V 4 JOSE JJ JO .. .' a - o` 4 JO 4 it • `+ 11, iN i . u o y o : k k w 4 a p ti 4 y V a V 4 '. Y 4 1. 4 .y y, v 4 4 O k k k a 4 w 4 0 ..Y 4 V n tt 7. 4 M t. y 4 O• ..Y,' .4. y 4 •' + O V 4 RAMONA * , y .. .' a - o` 4 JO 4 it • `+ 11, iN i . u o y o : k k w 4 a aV a y n h f. w a v a' . V w O 4 y k Y O Y a 4 `a VALDEZ JO h a JO JO JO JO 4 0D V .. 4 4 JO JO IO C 4 } u a. .4. t }. e YOLANDA ' w * JO .,,• JO 4 0D V .. 4 4 JO T JO y M i IO r :[1 rn r To !. 4 0 `o h DR. 4 4 4. a 4 4M N .r DR. O .i v 4 y as yw ti 0 4 0 D R. 4 0 O a am .4 +X H O * o at 00 0 0 r tea a r 9�1 f Fk a 0 DR 4. 4 hM O ti h0 DR. 4 JO .f0 0 0 NO1 1fl Ia Tins- 0 0 Z w., m O X .0. M O 1 Say, lsto 7001 -IDS Soso 1S3M y5 ,142.,0 SCALE :I• 100• d ply t•• •lt • 0 10.10 0, N .•••••••••••••\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\c•.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\N\\\\\\\.\\\ 0 ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2013DCV-0765-B; Nueces County vs Veronica Munguia 8409-0009-0530 & 8409-0009-0535; Lots 53 and 54, Block 9, Steele Addition 2908 Mary St. - Corpus Christi July 5, 2016 19,198.30 3,500.00 2,535.50 8,750.00 18.23% 40.00% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 2,119.10 106.46 City of Corpus Christi 2,440.67 122.62 Corpus Christi Independent School District 5,191.76 260.83 Del Mar College 1,066.80 53.59 City Paving & Demo Liens 8,379.97 421.00 A VACANT RESIDENTIAL LOT, 50 FTX 135 FT, LOCATED 3 BLOCKS SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF PORT AVE. AND AGNES ST. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS NEXTLOTS NOW, LLC OF LANCASTER, TEXAS. 2156 z m co Q a .0181510 VIS If ,k e k(: =l; aia av iC If a a a ala 9a ti EL ESA ., Ik .t 8 k,,, ~ a t. t4 tta aea f rrr4Ykrdt�sk ( y a: a :Ir I) R ti, M : » o Mkt T� S} H$ O C" n" "" 4 " .I C o a a a a"s r e a. a 4•"» . v C/SCA DOLORES tt gk at h C" ~ a IV �. M. w r y a: a :Ir I) R ti, M : » kis r k y k $ . P .. t. {: , , " 4 " „ a aia `•1�i 3 a r • > , a C ri � r _ a a . v s /- a k " DOLORES tt gk at h C" a t �. M. w r y a: a :Ir I) R ti, M : » kis r k y k It 441. N. ',»4.h ..o�< a'a 4�,a:sc«c.Gacs:r 4.gt „1. o OS 0 W 41 f It *o y °s ar 'z -,x cy i:.n k �".f0 �k I1� J' 1 I� 4-1 PORr ti "Ir i Yjn{ » If 9 Sr. .t,r 11 AVE. Uz r ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2014DCV-3320-F; Nueces County vs Samuel Mora 3415-0003-0115; 0.392 acre, more or less, out of Lot 11, Block 3, Highway Village Addition, Section 1 10317 N. Harrington - Corpus Christi July 5, 2016 19,886.07 5,300.00 1,991.50 11,760.00 26.65% 45.07% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 1,590.64 264.64 City of Corpus Christi 1,577.62 262.47 Tuloso Midway Independent School District 3,075.49 511.68 Del Mar College 691.91 115.11 City Paving & Demo Liens 12,950.41 2,154.60 THIS PROPERTY ISA VACANT RESIDENTIAL LOT, 100 FT BY 200 FT, LOCATED 2 BLOCKS EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF LEOPARD ST & MCKENZIE RD. IN TULOSO-MIDWAY ISD. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS NEXTLOTS NOW, LLC OF LANCASTER, TEXAS 2157 o,/B1-V9 12 OBBY 017 027 207 0 e\-) Cg C) .lits, ;53 I 44 ...s• csl F.- c<s -,.. 1\ . . 03 (34 •P• r, _•••••1'. 027 •••1 • .4-• v 0 7 437 0&nI Jo • -4 SO aj.rr, / 1.070 1.. OP ad In - -• So 1 9 .... /I. .99 '• * 1 :,0 ” e Id •-•:, + So : US • • , 0, Cde •97,71 "." t.Z13-J1 > l• /° - • 4.7.4. "1'19,4 r• 74. c) '1- , tsar 0 330 93.0 10 AO / 50 41,..• 49 d • do r -A ; 303.3 C. I 7-...) .4'9 V .11/:••• f I" .h -. •-• . . . . - - 43/ 0') ,.._•19 . ...,1 /Tray _Grr d •49•91 - • r•P 7239 COON T/4' so • 10 ARTHUR ' 4.. 4..,'. - - 43) P • _ rr7/140 • - 2 251477' rs" ® . _a 1'2 C") ; •*: • ;113 SS*.er Z "id 4-) Z st ; 4=4 < 14 er; /43494• 11ISIVHdrit „0 03 T• 03031 /Th N qt, 4. 1934, 03 .14 3A.,12:16 S'3'12JVH 43 • 29'79 73 33 E 1. :0. : 403 /17 /Papa 41' ..v.0 cn 7777f ,03 eV 39, 543 is• ;30 49...ddaddr. en 290.797 S.7 722' rorg39 211 9.73 •••• I t di Y.- 11- - -1 -r7 t tese -1 • I• 0 -4 t; CP • 7/3 Z•sv_./S• •!•2•72. 3A 12:fc N10.1.01v12.17.1V S, V 3 7,, ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2013DCV-4618-A; Nueces County vs Kevin D. Williams 3443-0036-0070; Lots 7 and 8, Block 36, Hillcrest Addition 1614 Peabody Ave - Corpus Christi August 2, 2016 5,595.27 2,500.00 1,397.50 5,200.00 44.68% 48.08% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 848.24 167.14 City of Corpus Christi 965.56 190.26 Corpus Christi Independent School District 2,145.36 422.72 Del Mar College 410.09 80.80 City Paving & Demo Liens 1,226.02 241.58 A VACANT LOT, 50 FTX 140 FT, NEAR THE OLD CROSSLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, IN THE H1LLCREST NEIGHBORHOOD. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS PORT OF CORPUS CHRISTI AUTHORITY OF NUECES COUNTY 2162 55 22 11 22 . 1, is /. . .1.7 . . Af . ... a . 1 „ 3 1 3443- „ „ 5 ” e 4 .7 7 a Rs $1 t IC /1 t< ii 11 t it rl IIIiiIH (34 Uj AVENUE ti .• . 2423 . is fl , . 22 . . is n , . . •Or is I Ai 6 7 t1 tf :1 „ 17 It . 8 If . 15 1'30 II If . . ;.: /1 /I /2 N r• 11 N. ,..o... r ty 1511 45 I. tf g 15 ... . , 4 a, I/ 3443'2410 AVENUE 179.15 (9, CROSSLEY SCHOOL TRACT: r I EXEMPT (2.524c) 1986-0000-0000 17370 /.0 II , o „ . ..4'.1 5 , R ' : ,IlliH C • ... la 9 6 , D. D, , A .7.: 0 .k. ' -'• ' li ..-.. t ‘11, 2,7.71 8 4.11 ‘.14. EW 11,IG T R ACT tInl`" XINGTON I sr. • I C 0 6290-3-10 PARK1 515. 0 (34 (34 1- (r) Is rf ;..i , 24 11 .. . .S • 21 . If •S ' ' 21 21 . . at If • 0 ,i, al 1 0 478 ft I. ZS IS If • • \ /7 0 )1 ZS • /.7 11 I/ 17 /174 t% t. 11 If lir J.1 t$ M. l l If .;.,, /2 .11 1 I!!I 1111 /I 1- 114 (34 1Q (1) 4.1 cr 1/97 SC4,11 GI: i00. BAY VIEW CEMETERY STREET 1.1 A., A • 1...' .... tt. i'. . • 4 4 . ...:::: NJ' 3 . . 2 . St ..';'.. / 0 • /2 7 1, Ir., I r /3 I a /4 /3 I .5. • 9 .3 7. : /2 • ... . /9 7 : 7. ' , 20 . - • 2/ 7. .. 22 .. • STREET Eli IL MOORE- /OP C. C.:31 1, .gt. it srs 1- - -8-91 AVENUE A 3292- 115 /0 4' 3 8 '7 (44 (44 cC 1- (i) 2 5 U-22 NUECE S COUNTY APPRAIAL DISTRICT ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2014DCV-3326-C; Nueces County vs Willie J. Adams 3232-0009-0090; Lot 9, Block 9, Harlem Park 3333 Washington St. - Corpus Christi August 2, 2016 14,021.92 2,000.00 1,430.50 5,266.00 14.26% 37.98% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 939.60 38.16 City of Corpus Christi 1,047.81 42.56 Corpus Christi Independent School District 2,387.55 96.97 Del Mar College 426.29 17.31 City Paving & Demo Liens 9,220.67 374.50 A VACANT RESIDENTIAL LOT, 43.64 FTX 94.55 FT. LOCATED 4 BLOCKS SOUTH OF ROSE SHAW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS NEXTLOTS NOW, LLC OF LANCASTER, TEXAS 2163 UIIO t c. /0/89 55.4< 31 30 11 11 1,{ YJ •az 1f f? /6 i `s7 N M N /6 m /0 6 J J t 2 4 z 0 1- u 5 /0 /1 /2 14 31. 54.4 8 .. 7 6 S 4 14 J `n /6 ax. 4G 34.14 /G /8 /J 17 /F Y0 /3 21 I1 11 1/ 1 /0 8 .17 Jd .5 4 Jo J J/ lJ.4c 44`24 ELGIN 1- 14.44 77 /8 !7 20 21 11 YJ 3 1f Y5 2132 Y6 Y1 30 J/ 4J 4c ST. 4a.x4 /4 IS 14 /J 1.1 If /0 5 6 7 326 S 4 J 1 „.4' WASHINGTON ST. 90, 1J b y 14.15 } d b l a 44.r .0 c 50„ [-KC,5..p r J Hf -40 4RC#1 12139-105 v 14 54.3 i 10.5 4 41 J4.ii< 8 14 J • 14.s 774,7 . 10.5 1at39 7 1-11- , 1 14 .40.5 1 14.5 CARVER ST. 70.5 4 Il 1d 50 10.3 4 16 0 14. • 01.5 4.1 94.5 u 11 r (0 14. 17 8 7 12 11 11 25 16 2713 1d 1) v 20 48 l� 31 54..1" 8 2 0 t 1 14.5 14.5 /51.0 4."^- 1 AWJ ON • PARK /51.0 ELGIN ST. 04.14 ..114 15 /4 /1 15 11 eft 10 ZoO ., 21 12 .l4 1S 42.44 tG 44.5 ,14 44 15 44 Ic Il 70 1) 13� 10 -a� 11 12 1J 14 14 44 .05 44.3 1GY G )G" 8li G7 G7 11 // /0 1 3232 5 ^1- 7 6 S F J 2 4144 ;1st 40.5 u 44 u 14 10 a d 4 ,; 41' 7 c 5 4 3 44 2 44 Iq 44.3 U-828 U81 U79 NUECES COUNTY App <AISAL43 O(STRIC� ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2015DCV-2875-A; Nueces County vs Paul Rowland 2523-0003-0100; Lot 10, Block 3, Flour Bluff Heights 446 Skipper Ln. - Corpus Christi August 2, 2016 19,226.55 5,000.00 1,513.50 12,375.00 26.01% 40.40% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 1,693.43 307.08 City of Corpus Christi 1,817.77 329.63 Flour Bluff Independent School District 3,727.67 675.97 Del Mar College 751.88 136.34 City Paving & Demo Liens 11,235.80 2,037.48 A VACANT LOT, 55 FTX 125 FT, LOCATED IN FLOUR BLUFF OFF OF NAS DRIVE BETWEEN THE NAVAL AIR STATION AND SPID. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS DANIEL ABEBE OF FRIENDSWOOD, TEXAS 2164 G 11s/FJH3 snd iioo 10 .(1I:3 0) m p v, 0 0-216-G Z/1-95'-91 bZ to 1R h.l. 7 COVE DR. ]41 `Y 65 k I N I Y� b—v-•k I Ito YN N r N 'N A A A V 9 y -4', m Obi U2/6 0 -1 1- 0 fel -9g-910Z 7VNION 3 Di N3QhlV9 $ CO LJ N so.is' 1 O O ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2011DCV-1307-C; Nueces County vs Yolanda Roescher 1014-0001-0220; Lot 22, Block 1, Broadmoor Park No. 3 1707 Robin Dr. - Corpus Christi September 6, 2016 34,309.96 3,000.00 2,758.50 7,495.00 8.74% 40.03% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 3,488.80 24.56 City of Corpus Christi 3,942.82 27.75 Corpus Christi Independent School District 8,488.65 59.75 Del Mar College 1,745.45 12.29 City Paving & Demo Liens 16,644.24 117.16 A VACANT RESIDENTIAL LOT, 55 FTX 109 FT, LOCATED ABOUT 2 BLOCKS SOUTHEAST OF CROSSTOWN EXPRESSWAY @ PORT AVE. THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DEMOLISHED A SUB -STANDARD HOUSE ON THIS PROPERTY A FEW YEARS AGO. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS NEXTLOTS NOW, LLC OF LANCASTER, TEXAS 2168 J82C U 82D HIGHWA Y NO 286 z 0 1- J Q 1- 1 7 s 4 3 2% U 65 ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2014DCV-2777-G; Nueces County vs Irma Mancha 2277-0006-0220; Lot 22, Block 6, El Rey Addition 3025 Greenwood - Corpus Christi October 4, 2016 7,482.55 2,800.00 1,513.50 6,745.00 37.42% 41.51% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 1,182.73 203.35 City of Corpus Christi 1,321.33 227.18 Corpus Christi Independent School District 2,983.87 513.03 Del Mar College 549.90 94.55 City Paving & Demo Liens 1,444.72 248.40 A VACANT RESIDENTIAL LOT, 40 FTX 134 FT, LOCATED ABOUT 3 BLOCKS NORTHEAST OF ROSE SHAW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS NEXTLOTS NOW, LLC OF LANCASTER, TEXAS 2170 ST ST 4 44/4 5 4144 1164.444.1.:. 111 111 6 444.0f V /4 2 17 27 13 • 29.Z0 18 31 12 24 ow 2 .7( 1! >..... ...v.s. ' 20 3 /0- 4.1 21 1 ... 8 .1* 744 12 _At 8023 ' 14 . 5 • 7 24. 18 6 Lj 25 A .5 4-1 26 5 4 . 7 27 9 /0 11 r.o..n /3 3 23 2 2 . 4g V a. / -. 30 4 . ..-co 6 1141.1 22 2! 20 19 44.4 /8 44.4 '7" /1 12 13 14 15 41.4 `) E' ST. 22 2/ 20 19 4,4 44, 17, 11 12 13 14 15 16 (r 'ay 4,4 ST ST.: 14 /'l k 224 ZOO ST 414 2212°1 81 111 111 ST.: 14 /'l k 224 ZOO ST S ST 41 * • • 39 41 41 6 5 4 3. 2 1 . 27 28 29.Z0 • 27 31 Z 24 44 23 A 2 .7( 6 .. Ili 42 .44 S ST lJJ 41.4 /6 L5 17 14 /8 /3 19 /2 22 9 24 7 25 6 C.c26 5 .q27 4 (-)28 3 22 30 1 1.4 sr., • 11.4. 1 25 24 C\1 23 11.4 1. 4 2 22 Ct2/ .3 4 5 6 Lu20 7 ,Is(:::).eare8eror cc/8 Q17 /6 /5 14 9 10 /1 12 13 3 , 54. a 15 Z: 14 13 12 17 18 ; 9 11 20 10, 21 9 22 23 24 • 6c3 25 26 27 2B 29 * r, .30 94 4'42 Z 41 * • 40 39 45 44 6 5 4 3 2 1 '',.• 30 i 29 --,- ...4 • 27 26 Z 24 44 23 A 2 .7( 6 .. Ili 41 44 lJJ 41.4 /6 L5 17 14 /8 /3 19 /2 22 9 24 7 25 6 C.c26 5 .q27 4 (-)28 3 22 30 1 1.4 sr., • 11.4. 1 25 24 C\1 23 11.4 1. 4 2 22 Ct2/ .3 4 5 6 Lu20 7 ,Is(:::).eare8eror cc/8 Q17 /6 /5 14 9 10 /1 12 13 3 , 54. a 15 Z: 14 13 12 17 18 ; 9 11 20 10, 21 9 22 23 24 • 6c3 25 26 27 2B 29 * r, .30 94 4'42 Z 41 * • 40 39 .38 37 36 35 34 in 3.3 • i , 32 6 ,,....., 11 3[1 30 i 29 --,- ...4 • 27 26 25 24 44 23 A 2 .7( 6 .. Ili 1 Alt 2 A 3 45 . 6 7 8 9 10 12 _At , 13 . ' 14 . 5 • 17 . 17 18 19 20 21 11.441 MONTGOMERYST. at ..) 42 Ir, 4.A 41 . . , 39 / . 38. - 37 2- .36 35. 34 in 3.3 • i , 32 (Th- 11 3t • --- 29 28 , 27 26 .25 24 0 23. 04 22.. k . k., 44.2 2 44 40 4 15 • . 6 7 8 9 10 . ' 12 1.3 14/5 .29 16 17 18 /9 1/ 20 0 21; 444 WAINWRIGHT ST 441 44 ats 39 . c8 4 6 45 34 3.133PA 32 r -r\ ,._.../ / 31 V/94 29 28 27 26 25 114 24 4 .4 42 4! 40 39 .38 37 36 35 . 3 4 33 32 3! 30 .29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22,, A 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 /0 11 12 /3 14 15 16 17 /8 19 20 a. - -. .. 4 . 5 6 7 8 . 1 1 1 1 L.- 10 1/ 12 13 /4 15 16 /7 /8 414 41.1 44.2 04 41.4 41.4 . .- .....-i rf3° . . _ 41.4 444 44.2 1 2 3 "I' ..* 1 5 6 7 8 9 /0 11 2 1 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21;rk) 11.7 It c.) • • 01:: 14 1.4.1 TAR LTOk 01 .42 04 4/40 ats 39 . c8 4 6 45 34 3.133PA 32 r -r\ ,._.../ / 31 V/94 29 28 27 26 25 114 24 04 23 .02 22.; 4 40 39 . . 35 7 1306 33 32- ® .30 29 1 . 27 26 25 24 23 22n t 23 22,) • ..`-`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 /0 11 12 /3 14 15 16 17 /8 19 20 21; - -. .. 4 . 5 6 7 8 . 1 1 1 1 L.- 10 1/ 12 13 /4 15 16 /7 /8 414 41.1 44.2 GUADALUPE ST. 444 04 A 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 r -r\ ,._.../ / 31 1, 14. . i. 29 1 4,P.-" . 01 A 444 .42 X 4 40 39 39 .37 35 7 .44 33 32- 3/ .30 29 1 29 i 27 26 25 24 23 22n t 23 22,) z (I) ..- ---. --.- .-- 2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9j/0. 11 11211.3 i i.i t ,.., I,„ , ,. i _ / 2 3 4 . 5 6 7 8 . 1 1 1 1 L.- NO GALES ST 441 ,..0.4 ... OA 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 r -r\ ,._.../ / 31 1, 14. . i. 29 1 4,P.-" 26 25 414 0.4 OA ' 42 41.4039 3 474 39 38 37, 36 35 34 33 3. 2 . 31 3p. 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22,) z (I) / 1 / / ./ 1 / / / / 2 3 4 . 5 6 7 8 9 10 1/ 12 13 /4 15 16 /7 /8 19 20 2/ 04 41.4 41.4 .....-i rf3° . . _ 41.4 444 44.2 SO LEDAD ST 01 0.4 414 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 r -r\ ,._.../ / 31 30 29 1 4,P.-" 26 25 444 424 01 42 4140 3 474 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32-3/ 13 30 29 28 2726 /8 25 24 23 22 z (I) 410,14 f 1 1 6 ' .....-i .. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 /0 /1 12 11 14 15 /6 17 18 /9 20 2IX c.) 01:: 04 0.4 0.4 • 0.4 414 0.1 PRESA ST 411 2 k 474 41 12.4 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 r -r\ ,._.../ / 31 30 29 29' 27 26 25 04 .24 414 23 411.4 22 n 1 2 114 3 474 4 5 6 7 8 9 /0 12 13 14 15 17 /8 19 114 20 474 21'1 44.7 BOL IVAP Astimenzecons U8213 NUE C z 5 5 COUNTY APPRAISAL 01.5TR1 ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2012DCV-1309-C; Nueces County vs Jacob Gonzalez 0481-1402-0390; Lots 39 and 40, Block 1402, Bay Terrace Additon No. 2 1514 17th St. - Corpus Christi November 1, 2016 11,637.57 6,500.00 2,663.50 7,813.00 55.85% 83.19% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 1,239.04 408.47 City of Corpus Christi 1,412.73 465.73 Corpus Christi Independent School District 3,019.02 995.27 Del Mar College 625.08 206.07 City Paving & Demo Liens 5,341.70 1,760.97 THIS IS A VACANT RESIDENTIAL LOT, 50 FTX 125 FT, LOCATED 2 BLOCKS SOUTHWEST OF WYNNE SEALE JUNIOR HIGH. THE OFFER IS MADE BY AN ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS LEO AND YOLANDA MONTEMAYOR OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 2177 NUECES COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT y N MC/(ENZ/E ininliMEMENS 11111111=1M .11111M11111111 MINIM 1 T a a. a0 'A a a , a t,. • ,1x' b N EL/ZABETH ST. a. a 7a C. MEMONN Mal a ©_ ®_ IMMEEN 11111111111=1 111E11111111E MIMI MOW ®111111111111 =IEEE ..: —Nw.w_ ®1111111111 imam milisim 0 111111111111 11111111111:111111 MAI= MEM MIEN © = B11111211111111 —© 0 B4ILLUIEF 11111111111111111 �� ©EINEIE =MEI MIME ��, 1111111111111111113111111111 ST. CtOSED 0 co NIMBI 1111111111111 COLE ST. a ST. fXIV 0 sw 09y a S tT. a' =•t HOIHlf 31Y3S 3NNAM ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: °A) of Current Value: 2014DCV-2783-B, Nueces County vs Irene AdeII Terrell 3443-0030-0160; Lots 16 and 17, Block 30, Hillcrest Addition 2130 Stillman Ave - Corpus Christi November 1, 2016 13,280.20 2,500.00 1,476.50 5,200.00 18.83% 48.08% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 1,014.68 78.20 City of Corpus Christi 1,160.52 89.44 Corpus Christi Independent School District 2,460.51 189.63 Del Mar College 507.39 39.10 City Paving & Demo Liens 8,137.10 627.12 A VACANT LOT, 50 FTX 140 FT, AT THE CORNER OF STILLMAN AND W. BROADWAY IN THE HILLCREST NEIGHBORHOOD. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS PORT OF CORPUS CHRISTI AUTHORITY OF NUECES COUNTY. 2178 ' •a A 1 >.- z' p a $ W �2 NUECES COYNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT ,C" s;. N 1 r1 Ay�y'a - ril - u " ll 4. 4 <4 h . a �, NUECES ©‘1 . LP t, 1 r1 Ay�y'a - ril 2I, x Q ll 4. e a yt. �, FRAU I':' pPy z1 .'1• aZ fY Jr 0,r +r m aa- $ ^ LP t, 1 r1 Ay�y'a - 412. 2I, x ^ y 4. e a yt. �, r !✓AOn f fY Jr 0,r +r m aa- $ ^ ro ^ ,b - ro coc se.tc ,F! I ‘C.<'\ SG { et, Y a yt. a t. !:, +s 7 BROADWAY NOl9N/X37 0 � C ST. 0 V N ST. ar a s sc. f [ s �+x O y> - Z ra a I ‘C.<'\ SG { et, Y a yt. a t. !:, ST. 1111111 u a' ^ 11°a ' rYI DEMPSEY MOORE NUECES 7 " � JOHN e � , ,-a SUMMERS AOO9d3d BROADWAY IL sr $ '44 ST. ST. 6 �, a i, sr r a i sz 4 '5. • 114, �® NPW77/15 m A X am wr V -I 0 M C 0 ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: 2012DCV-1310-F; Nueces County vs Mary Brown 5000-0024-0050; Lot 5-A, Block 24, Meadow Park Property Location: 505 Osage - Corpus Christi Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: February 7, 2017 10,173.29 5,000.00 1,791.50 24,313.00 49.15% 20.57% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 1,383.77 436.42 City of Corpus Christi 1,637.75 516.52 Corpus Christi Independent School District 3,466.87 1,093.40 Del Mar College 711.57 224.42 City Paving & Demo Liens 2,973.33 937.74 A SMALL WOOD FRAME HOUSE, 816 SQ FT, ON A 50 X 145 FT LOT ACROSS FROM THE ZAVALA SENIOR CENTER. THE HOUSE NEEDS EXTENSIVE REPAIRS THROUGHOUT TO MAKE IT HABITABLE. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS ROSE ROMERO OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 2187 CHIPPEWA ISG1 a 1 ,fa I 6 o t�t4 I 6 , , 1 Si 8 , I I fS� 884,. 1 p I t1 9j1 I-1 4Bri` 0.40 9B „,.0 I I 4 10 22 3 ``+++��FFF 3A�E-114 1/ Ar1'`5S° f 11 'Itr 1 I 2 I. „ II 12 i 1 18efi Z> —.4 A /2AIp y, I /50 ! A 1 1 1 1 3i 1 Iso NAVAJO /so a 8 ST. ftp----_ 120 1 1 50 7A ,0, I I A 11-- 6 -- le5.h. 8 Si4 l' 9A pE ;,,•, 9 0 — 1D .1 q < 150 4 ISo 311,14,3 I45 A, /1 ! ,30 2 1 ' xs I • 2A/ 12,KIt /5.5 /SG ST. 150 R t 6__ft � n 4A ft "5 ISG 73.45 !A: a rr- 41406 —0 J5.154,9 40C 141 37D O �1 980 -.4A -A ,3a 3A 0110 28 5i/a0 1 2 /5050( i /5019 P 1 051't 11,1 afa' 10A 1 I` 1 1.59 K) I I so.. 224 n. 2H II 51.751 I 2 3t 13z, Le 39 37 +A 4 /51' 5 6 /49 36 IAS 4 35 7 �I C)34 8 4\1'1 0.01 (r)32 10 Pd 1., 31 1 30 12 U-80 29 zoo `LINDELAND p50fl 2 i L1 NDELAND � ., B i 1 5. o 4500-3-0 LINDELAND 41. 81 114 I,:4 41/2 $30 to • /r. /14 0 CD W tri /N N U-69 6/96 V 74-) scala. 1., 100' U75 No, 004. ' A, PI-ASIu z*. R1CT ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due AU Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 012DCV-5378-F; Nueces County vs Bessie Nash 3443-0003-0050; The West 50 feet of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Block 3, Hillcrest Addition 2808 Hulbirt - Corpus Christi February 7, 2017 14,285.98 2,500.00 1,833.50 12,076.00 17.50% 20.70% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 2,061.11 96.16 City of Corpus Christi 2,316.50 108.07 Corpus Christi Independent School District 5,000.69 233.30 Del Mar College 938.42 43.78 City Paving & Demo Liens 3,969.26 185.18 AN OLD WOOD FRAME HOUSE BADLY DAMAGED BY FIRE, ON A 50 FTX 125 FT LOT IN THE HILLCREST NEIGHBORHOOD. THE ROOF AND EAST WALL HAVE FAILED AND THE HOUSE SHOULD BE DEMOLISHED. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS PORT OF CORPUS CHRISTI AUTHORITY OF NUECES COUNTY. 2190 12 ISI U-9 8 C 11 10 /2 rt BAY BVLD. 00 150 1Y / ZO /9 4 5 7 9 /o /5O /aE /1 /C /3 /4 20- /3 /2 // /5O /A0 8 1 24 z. 9 /00 .9 ()SO 70 /1 n u n 14 0 10 rs y /4 /7 J 5 44 7 23 5 24 .5 u 8 Ld N 0 2 sr. A 8/00 M e 57 B A 14 .8 Z5 B 24 G t 7 3 /0 L2 21 11 /4 /4 /7 /d 0 r rs 9 /0 11 2 /3 /s /3 /4 H 17 /d /1 rs 10 1 / h / d. L/ 7 LL J 1 W 5 7A 15 IL 1 27 /50 / 18 /so '` rs Z 3 4 T J G 3 C-'��7 8 9 /oa R /1 IS "t 4.1 45 24 24 23 i8 13 lLI 2 O r5 2/ 20 /1 4 /8 7 /7 /0 k d 9 a / 20 /3 5 3 17 1 4 7 /4 /5 9 /3 5 /2 /0 /TO /1 /50 58 M A 1 I /s0 17 24 2S 6 it G 23 7 .50 8 .0 /2 d 12 /z so /9 20 S s DRIVE ZS 9 50 /2 7 1G /7 /9 0 4 Z3 24 24 17 /5 1 3 5 7 8 /2 AVE. ZS 54 ^4 1 ZS 1 3 z. 41 70 H 3 4 6 4 m 7 17 A: rs K 1S /3 8 9 /0 /1 AVE mo.®m MEMBEINE 131111®. CUL ac ` ■ BM 7 1 ME .° ■ 11111111 MOUNIINE ALLEY CLOSE6 45 9 /O // /4 /3 (N/'.''.//55\ /4 /7 /d 25 / 1 v /T0 \ d �/ / 7 2 J 1 6 G 7 [3:5:.. /s0 / L 8 /So / z Z. Z 3 4 T J G 3 7 O 8 9 /d // /2 15 25 O 24 / i. 55 45 LL 41 70 4 15 /d 17 /4 /5 /4 25 0 h /3 8 7 As a /r 2f 2 J 1 6 G 7 5/9.61 stale 1 1 NU CFS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT ANALYSIS OF OFFER RECEIVED FOR TAX RESALE PROPERTY Suit Number & Style: Tax ID# & Legal: Property Location: Date of Sale: Amount Due All Entities: Amount of Offer: Cost of Sale: Current Value: % of Total Due: % of Current Value: 2014DCV-2775-F; Nueces County vs Daisy E. Taylor 3443-0009-0010; Lots 1 and 2, Block 9, Hillcrest Addition 2001 Van Loan Ave. - Corpus Christi February 7, 2017 9,822.68 2,500.00 1,632.50 48,969.00 25.45% 5.11% Entity Name Amount Due Each Entity Amount You Will Receive Nueces County 1,741.66 153.82 City of Corpus Christi 2,114.09 186.71 Corpus Christi Independent School District 4,463.32 394.18 Del Mar College 909.03 80.28 City Paving & Demo Liens 594.58 52.51 EARLY MID-CENTURY MODERN HOUSE, 1,020 SQ FT, ON A CORNER LOT, 50 FTX 130 FT, IN THE HILLCREST NEIGHBORHOOD. THE HOUSE HAS BEEN VACANT FOR SEVERAL YEARS. THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS THE PORT OF CORPUS CHRISTI AUTHORITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI. 2191 24 20 17 IC 25 24 Z3 77 ve ZS 41 Io / „ 4 .— 1/ /r4 /� p /7 5 6 A 13 4 7 A/4 h /4 /f -- e 25 /4 / p 75 2 1 4 r /3 /1 r— ft II 4 — 1.-.^'t /4 4, 9 /fO ki 5/96 WEST WEST BROAD iiUII - e o o n c 4 5 0 7 . t7 tf Lf 2¢37 or. ma— /1 /30 w /0 l� .— 1/ S 4 — _'')--1.5 'q /4 a \' 1 ,.... <REALA�I t9Rz leA�w 74.b fe G920 //. /5 /4 8 // PAX.r STI' y64�HOND 1 20 2/ 04 5 24 7 /0 4 s /0 4 /30 ST. t ISO t0 ZS /7 0/ /0 /5 /4 0 /3 /2 1/ /o 9 8 75 Y1 t) 14 tf 74 i7 '3 01 4 $ a t 01 /0 /to t /1 /0 d 7 $ 4 ST. 0 /!0 70 I! g 0/ 21 8 d 7 ZS 13 /4 Lf 2¢37 21 .. 01 /1 /30 w /0 l� .— 1/ /7 /o — _'')--1.5 'q /4 a \' 1 /f 7 ilk /4 4 5 4 3 Z / p ZS 4 IMF /3 5 /L T 4 /1 3 Z3 v /SO / /x v ©EMPSEY ST. w /SO 1O 25 t7 z 24PM 4 r 70 24 17 /J It iii. /t /3a ©EMPSEY ST. w /SO 1O 25 21 43 14 70 24 17 2f /t /3a w to // 4 /6 t/ _'')--1.5 'q 9 y /7 /4 0 /9 0 7a c /F 7 G S 4 3 L/ ti 25 J., /1 3 Z3 Z /O :' t ... •• rJe 9'75it I /x 4 ST. W 34 VAN LOAN BROADWAY Az/40 /3 a /30 Y !_® /1 Io /5 /7 e /8 /9 C_ 20 5 2! 7 22 3 IJ 2 /7a Zt /30 Az/40 /3 II a /4 // /5 _ /4 q f 7 /4 �J /7 C /8 7 /7 13 4 24 J 0/ 4 00 .7 Z3 Z `• /..to 24 / /JO /Of /3 Ate /4 10' - 1/ /3 /0 /4 9 /7 /6 /9 5 7 0 to S 2/ 4 u 23 3 2 /30 24 11 1 ST/ LL MAN /9/ NUECES COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT scab i" 100 L U-24 Ordinance authorizing the resale of 26 properties for $96,850.00 which were foreclosed upon for failure to pay ad valorem taxes, of which the City shall receive $8,213.35 plus $15,790.35 for partial payment of City paving and demolition liens. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: Section 1. Pursuant to Section 34.05 of the Tax Code, the governing body of the City of Corpus Christi authorizes the resale of 26 properties listed on the attached and incorporated Exhibit A for $96,850.00 which were foreclosed upon for failure to pay ad valorem taxes, of which the City shall receive $8,213.35 plus $15,790.35 for partial payment of City paving and demolition liens. Section 2. The Nueces County Judge is authorized to execute a resale deed for each property upon payment to the City of the City's share of the tax resale proceeds. That the foregoing ordinance was read for the first time and passed to its second reading on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Council Member That the foregoing ordinance was read for the second time and passed finally on this the day of , 2017, by the following vote: Joe McComb Ben Molina Rudy Garza Lucy Rubio Paulette Guajardo Greg Smith Michael Hunter Carolyn Vaughn Council Member PASSED AND APPROVED on this the day of , 2017. ATTEST: Rebecca Huerta City Secretary Joe McComb Mayor EXHIBIT A TAX RESALE PROPERTY LIST Item # Suit Number Property Location Legal Description Amount of Bid City's Portion City's Portion of City Paving and Demo „.a 1 1737 03-1971-B 1520 Mestina 3795-0009-0050: Lot 5, Block 9. Jones Addition S 4,500.00 S 630.06 S 68.86 2 Pulled. See below. _3 1804 10-3474-C 1949 Sandy Way 2127-0008-0400; Lot 40, Block 'if, Don Pat icio Subdivision 4,100.00 587.66 508.11 4 Pulled. See below. 5 Pulled. See below. 6 2103 2011DCV-2148-G 140 Watson 8284-0010-0225; The East 1/2 of Lot 22 and the West 6.0 feet of Lot 23, Block 10, Southmoreland Addition 1,250.00 0.59 10.76 2110 2012DCV-4402-F 329 Picture Court 2486-0008-0038; Tract E of Lot 3, Block H, Flour Bluff Estates 1,500.00 200.77 84.31 8 2111 2011DCV-2152-H 1416 San Juan 6403-0003-0140 and 6103-0003-0145; Lot 14, Block C, Parker Addition 1,150.00 58.05 438.75 9 2133 2012DCV-2287-G 929 Louis Lynch Drive 2780-0002-0170; Lot 17, Block 2, Subdivision of the Geistman Tract Z700.00 45.25 719.61 10 2134 2011DCV-0854-H 3810 Sarita 8724-0010-0120; Lot 12, Block 10, Temple Addition 8,000.00 677.25 2,218.32 11 2135 2012DCV-0822-A 2214 Kennedy Avenue 8013-0004-0120; Lot 12-A, Block 4, Shoreline Park 2,500.00 102.00 388.57 12 2136 2013DCV-3283-B 532 19th Street 3775-0000-0030; Lot 3 Jasmin Addition 1,000.00 - - 13 2144 10-3487-G 1725 Hudson 1585-0005-0270; Lot 27, Block 5, Second Revision of Chula Vista Addition No. 1 10,000.00 1,485.58 1,493.02 14 2146 2011DCV-1435-F 1322 Stillman Avenue 3443-0022-0130; Lots 13 and 14, Block 22, Hillcrest Addition 2,500.00 78.04 439.33 15 2147 2013 DCV -5157-B 2413 Sarita 4287-0016-0030; Lot 3, Block 16, E. A. Leake Addition 5,000.00 734.19 221.82 16 2148 2014DCV-4449-H 3917 Santa Elena 7685-0003-0160; Lot 16, Block 3, Santa Elena Addition 6,000.00 993.04 223.00 17 2153 2011DCV-4165-B 11833 Haven Drive 5804-0001-0050; Lot 5-A, Block 1, Nueces Acres, Addition #2 5,250.00 318.34 955.77 18 2154 20 12DCV-1840-H 4422 Elvira Drive 4072-0003-0080; Lot 8, Block 3, La Pascua Addition, Unit 2 3,300.00 63.22 899.36 19 2156 2013DCV-0765-B 2908 Mary Street 8409-0009-0530 & 8409-0009-0535; Lots 53 and 54, Block 9, Steele Addition 3,500.00 122.62 421.00 20 2157 2014DCV-3320-F 10317 N. Harrington 3415-0003-0115; 0.392 acre, more or less, out of Lot 11, Block 3, Highway Village Addition, Section 1 5,300.00 262.47 2,154.60 21 2162 20I3DCBV-4618-A 1614 Peabody Avenue 3443-0036-0070; Lots 7 and 8, Block 36, Hillcrest Addition 2,500.00 190.26 241.58 2163 2014DCV-3326-C 3333 Washington Street 3232-0009-0090; Lot 9, Block 9, Harlem Park 2,000.00 42.56 374.50 23 Pulled. See below. 24 2168 2011DCV-1307-C 1707 Robin Drive 1014-0001-0220; Lot 22, Block 1, Broadmoor Park No. 3 3,000.00 27.75 117.16 25 2170 2014DCV-2777-G 3025 Greenwood 2277-0006-0220; Lot 22, Block 6, El Rey Addition 2,800.00 227.18 248.40 26 2177 2012DCV-1309-C 1514 17th Street 0481-1402-0390; Lots 39 and 40, Block 1402, Bay Terrace Addition No. 2 6,500.00 465.73 1,760.97 _, 2178 2014 -DCV -2783-B 2130 Stillman Avenue 3443-0030-0160; Lots 16 and 17, Block 30, Hillcrest Addition 2,500.00 89.44 627.12 28 2187 2012DCV-1310-F 505 Osage 5000-0024-0050; Lots 5-A, Block 24, Meadow Park 5,000.00 516.52 937.74 29 2190 0I2DCV-5378-F 2808 Hulbirt 3443-0003-0050; The West 50 feet of Lots I, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 3, Hillcrest Addition Z500.00 108.07 185.18 30 2191 2014DCV-2775-F 2001 Van Loan Avenue 3443-0009-0010; Lots 1 and 2, Block 9, Hillcrest Addition 2,500.00 186.71 52.51 Total of Agenda Item S 96.850.00 S 8.213.35 S 15.790.35 ITEMS PULLED BY THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI: 2 1801-1803 10-0683-H 301, 305 and 309 Skipper Lane 2476-0056-0719, 2476-0056-0720, & 2476-00586-0722 Lots 15, 16, and 17, Block 4, Flour Bluff Heights, unrecorded, out of Lot 8, Section 56, Flour Bluff & Encinal Farm and Garden Tracts 16,000.00 1,211.35 8,909.09 4 2021 04-7181-F 901 McIver St (@ Matlock) Park -0016-0010; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 16, Flour Bluff 10,000.00 1,161.33 3,557.05 5 2027 2012DCV-3185-H 1001 Green Bay Drive 2550-0001-0390; Lot 39, Block 1, Flour Bluff Point 2,000.00 167.43 30.39 _3 2164 2015DCV-2875-A 446 Skipper Lane 2523-0003-0100; Lot 10, Block 3, Flour Bluff Heights 5,000.00 329.63 2,037.48 Total of Items Pulled S 33 000.00 S 2.869.74 S 14.534.01 Total of Original List 5 129 850.00 S 11 083.09 S 30,324.36 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of June 13, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of June 20, 2017 DATE: May 1, 2017 TO: Margie Rose, City Manager FROM: E. Jay Ellington, Director, Parks and Recreation Department JayEll(c�cctexas.com 361-826-3464 Public Art for Fire Station No. 18 CAPTION: Motion authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an agreement to purchase a work of art created in mosaic tile, by artist Jeremiah Heye, owner of Heye Mosaics LLC, in the amount of $22,000.00 for Fire Station #18 to fulfill the public art requirement of Public Art Ordinance No. 21435, Sec 2-109. (Bond 2008) PURPOSE: Authorize an artist agreement for permanent art for Fire Station No. 18 as part of the City's public art program. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Three tile murals located on the exterior of the Fire Station No. 18 building, approved with the 2008 Bond projects, the primary proposed tile mural by artist Jeremiah Heye will be 8 feet wide by 12 feet high made of hand crafted tile murals and representing a Corpus Christi Fire Fighter in bunker gear. The second hand crafted tile mural will be an approximately 2.5 x 2.5 foot tile mosaic of the Corpus Christi Fire Department patch; and the final hand crafted tile mural will be an approximately 2.5 x 2.5 foot tile mosaic of the Corpus Christi Maltese Cross. The proposal was unanimously approved by the Arts and Cultural Commission at their April 11, 2017 meeting. ALTERNATIVES: Do not approve purchase of artwork. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: This project is being funded according to Public Art Policies and Guidelines. These policies and guidelines were passed by the City Council on March 10, 1987. Per the Public Art Ordinance, Ordinance No. 21435; Municipal public art program; Sec. 2-109 (e)(1) — Program Administration. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Non -emergency DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Legal, Engineering and Finance FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue X Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year: 2016- 2017 Project to Date Expenditures (CIP only) Current Year Future Years TOTALS Line Item Budget $ 22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 Encumbered/ Expended Amount This item BALANCE $ 22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 Fund(s): Bond Fund 3191 Comments: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this motion. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Artist Agreement Attachment—Concept drawing of artwork Page 1 of 15 AGREEMENT FOR COMMISSION OF PUBLIC ART BETWEEN THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI AND FOR ARTWORK AT FIRE STATION #18 This agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, a home -rule municipal corporation ("City"), acting through its duly authorized City Manager or the City Manager's designee ("City Manager") and Heye Mosaics LLC ("Artist"). WHEREAS, the City has allocated funds for the selection, purchase, and placement of a public work of art at, in, or near the selected site of Fire Station #18 located at 6226 Ayers Street, Corpus Christi, Texas, 78415 ("Project Premises"); WHEREAS, Artist submitted a proposal to City's Arts and Cultural Commission ("Commission"); WHEREAS, the City and Artist wish to set out the terms and conditions under which the Artwork is to be designed, fabricated, and installed in order to promote the integrity of Artist' ideas and statements as represented in the artist's proposal and as represented by and in the completed Artwork; NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Artist, for and in consideration of the covenants and agreements set out in this Agreement, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, agree as follows: Section 1. Preamble Language. The preamble language included above this initial numerated section is incorporated into this Agreement by reference and made a part of this Agreement for all intents and purposes. Section 2. Contract Administrator. The City's contract administrator for this Agreement is the City's Director of Parks and Recreation ("Director"). Section 3. Artwork. The City, through this Agreement, contracts with Artist to provide professional services in designing, constructing, finishing, transporting, and installing a permanent work of mosaic art ("Artwork"). A representative design of the Artwork, including plans and specifications, will be approved by the Director and the Arts and Cultural Commission and will be attached to this Agreement as Exhibit A and incorporated in this Agreement by reference. The City and Artist acknowledge that Artist's preliminary design for the Artwork, currently attached to this Agreement as Exhibit A, had previously been reviewed and approved by the City's Arts and Cultural Commission ("Commission"), a commission whose members are appointed by the City's City Council ("City Council"). Section 4. Term of Agreement. This Agreement, excluding certain covenants that survive this Agreement including, but not limited to, Sections 17, 19(B), 22, 23, and 25, will expire upon the City's final payment to Artist as governed by Sections 5(B)(iv) and 8(C) of this Agreement. Section 5. Compensation and Payment Schedule. A. The City will pay directly to Artist a fixed fee of $22,000.00, which is full compensation for all services to be performed and all materials to be furnished by Artist under this Agreement. The payment of compensation to Artist, at any time during the term of this Page 2 of 15 Agreement, will not be deemed a waiver of any right of the City or acceptance, by the City, of defective performance by Artist. B. The fee will be paid in the following installments, each installment to represent full and final payment for all services and materials provided prior to the payment thereof: (i) $3,300.00 will be remitted by the City to the Artist within twenty (20) working days of this Agreement being signed by both parties, (ii) $11,000.00 will be remitted by the City to the Artist within twenty (20) working days of the plans and specifications being approved by the City, (iii) $5,500.00 will be remitted by the City to the Artist within twenty (20) working days of the Artwork being substantially completed in Artist's studio, (iv) $2,200.00 within twenty (20) working days of the Artwork being installed and Notice of Final Acceptance has been issued. Section 6. Fabrication of Artwork. Artist shall furnish all labor, tools, materials, machinery, equipment, and incidentals necessary for the execution of the Artwork. Section 7. Completion of Artwork. The Artwork should be fully fabricated and ready for installation no later than 180 days after contract execution. Deviation from this deadline requires written notice to the City, but in no way shall fabrication and installation take more than 240 days. Section 8. Notice of Substantial Completion, Notice of Acceptance, and Notice of Final Acceptance. A. Director, or designee, shall inspect the Artwork plans and specifications. Upon acceptance of the Artwork plans and specifications, the City shall provide Artist with "Notice of Acceptance" and will issue payment to Artist, under Section 5(B)(ii) of this Agreement ("Notice of Acceptance"). Upon receipt of a deficiency notice, Artist will be given a reasonable time in which to correct all deficiencies noted by the City. Artist shall assume all costs associated with the correction of any deficiencies noted. Upon correction of all deficiencies, the City shall notify Artist in writing of the City's accepted arrival of the Artwork and issue a Notice of Acceptance. B. Artist shall send to Director a written notice of substantial completion ("Notice of Substantial Completion") when the Artwork has been substantially completed in accordance with the plans and specifications described in Exhibit A and will issue payment to Artist, under Section 5(B)(iii) of this Agreement. C. Upon installation of the Artwork and site cleanup, the City shall notify Artist in writing of its final acceptance ("Notice of Final Acceptance") of the Artwork and will issue payment to Artist, under Section 5(B)(iv) of this Agreement. Final acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld. Site cleanup shall consist of Artist cleaning and removing from the installation site all surplus and discarded materials, temporary structures, and debris of every kind occasioned by Artist's installation work in order to leave the installation site in a clean and orderly condition, substantially the same as that which originally existed. Page 3 of 15 Section 9. Installation of the Artwork. Artist shall provide plans and specifications for installation of the Artwork. Artist will also be contractually responsible for all completion costs associated with construction and installation of the Artwork. Artist shall be contractually responsible for the physical installation of the Artwork and all completion costs associated with the installation of the Artwork at the Project Premises, in compliance with the project's design firm. Section 10. Artwork Maintenance Instructions. Artist shall submit, within fourteen (14) days after installation of the Artwork, instructions and cost estimate regarding routine maintenance required for each component of the Artwork. Section 11. Work Standards. All fabrication work must be performed in a good and workmanlike manner and in accordance with the plans and specifications in Exhibit A. Section 12. Taxes. A. The City is a tax-exempt organization and no State of Texas or local sales taxes are due upon the Artwork by the City. The City shall supply Artist with a copy of the Texas Sales Tax Exemption Certificate ("Texas Certificate"). The City does not warrant that the Texas Certificate will be acceptable in any other jurisdiction outside the boundaries of Texas for tax-exempt purchases of materials or supplies to be used for the Artwork. B. Artist is solely responsible for the payment of any and all taxes that may become due to any taxing authority, agency, or entity with respect to services provided by Artist or with the Artwork that is the subject of this Agreement. This provision survives the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement. C. Artist shall pay, before delinquency: all taxes, levies, and assessments arising from Artist' activities and undertakings pursuant to this Agreement; taxes levied on Artist' art studio and any improvements on the studio property or other place used for the fabrication and completion of the Artwork; taxes levied on Artist' equipment, tools, and machinery; and taxes levied on Artist' interest in this Agreement. Section 13. No Assignment of Work Without Authorization. The work and services required of Artist under this Agreement are personal to Artist and may not be assigned, delegated, or transferred without the express, written approval of the City. This provision does not prohibit Artist from having the Artwork cast at an approved foundry or from employing qualified personnel to work under Artist' direct supervision and control with respect to the Artwork. Section 14. Review of Work in Progress. Upon reasonable, prior notice to Artist, the City's officers, employees, and agents must be allowed to make reasonable inspections and reviews of Artist' progress with respect to the Artwork. Section 15. Insurance. A. Artist shall secure and maintain, during the term of this Agreement and at Artist's sole expense, the levels and types of insurance set out in Exhibit B, a copy of which is attached to this Agreement and incorporated in this Agreement by reference. Page 4 of 15 B. Any subcontractors, if approved by the City, must secure and maintain the same levels and types of insurance shown in Exhibit B prior to performing any work related to this Agreement. C. Artist shall provide proof, by certificate of insurance meeting the limits and requirements set out in Exhibit B, to the City's Risk Manager and Director upon the execution of this Agreement. D. The certificate of insurance must name the City as an additional insured and must provide the City with at least 30 days written notice of cancellation, material change, or intent not to renew any insurance coverage required by Exhibit B. Section 16. Artist's Expenses. Artist shall be responsible for the payments of all mailings for submission to the City, including any required insurance certificates; shipping costs of the Artwork to the City; all costs of travel by Artist; all labor costs for Artist' employees; and all other costs, unless specifically excluded in this Agreement, that are necessary for the proper performance of the work, services, and obligations required by Artist under this Agreement. Section 17. Public Information by Artist. Artist shall acknowledge the City's role in purchasing the Artwork in all public presentations and written, printed, or electronic publications of the Artwork following the execution of this Agreement. This obligation of Artist survives the termination of this Agreement. Section 18. Independent Contractor; Lack of Contractual Authority. A. Artist shall perform all work and services under this Agreement as an independent contractor and not as an agent, representative, or employee of the City. B. This Agreement does not establish Artist as the agents or legal representatives of the City for any purpose whatsoever, and Artist are not granted any express or implied right or authority to assume or create any obligation or responsibility on behalf of, or in the name of, the City or to bind the City in any manner whatsoever. Section 19. Title; Copyright and License to Reproduce. A. Title to the Artwork will pass to the City upon remittance of the final payment. B. City obtains the rights to graphically reproduce, through photography or otherwise, the image of the Artwork including, but not limited to, the Artwork proposal and all preliminary studies, and to authorize third parties to graphically reproduce, through photography or otherwise, any and all of the same as are desired by the City for any purpose deemed appropriate by the City Manager. On each municipal reproduction, Artist will be acknowledged, using designations provided by Artist, to be the creator of the original Artwork depicted, provided that reproductions of any proposals and preliminary studies may not be identified as, or represented to be, the finished Artwork. The rights granted by this subsection survive the termination of this Agreement. Section 20. Risk of Loss. Artist shall take all measures reasonably necessary to protect the Artwork from loss or damage until Artist have completed delivery to the City of all materials that constitute and form the Artwork and ownership is transferred to the City. Artist shall obtain Page 5 of 15 property insurance, as set out in Section 15 of this Agreement, for loss or damage of the materials paid for by the City while in Artist's possession and control. Section 21. Indemnification. To the extent allowed by Texas law, Artist ("Indemnitors") shall fully indemnify, save, and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, and agents (collectively, "Indemnitees") against any and all liability, damage, loss, claims, demands, and actions of any nature whatsoever on account of personal injury (including, without limitation on the foregoing, premises defects, workers' compensation, and death claims), property loss, or damage of any kind whatsoever, including dishonest, fraudulent, negligent, or criminal acts of the Indemnitor or the Indemnitor's employees, representatives, or agents, acting alone or in collusion with others, which may arise out of, be caused by, or be in any way connected with, either proximately or remotely, wholly or in part, Indemnitor's design, fabrication, installation, repair, restoration, or removal of the Artwork and any act or omission of the Indemnitor or of any agent or employee of Indemnitor pursuant to performance under the terms of this Agreement. The terms of this indemnification are effective regardless of whether the injury, damage, or loss is caused by the sole, contributory, or concurrent negligence of the Indemnitees or any of them individually. The Indemnitor covenants and agrees that, if the Indemnitee is made a party to any litigation against the Indemnitor or in any litigation commenced by any party other than Indemnitor relating to this Agreement, Indemnitor shall, upon receipt of reasonable notice regarding commencement of litigation and at his/her own expense, investigate all these claims and demands, attend to their settlement or other disposition, defend Indemnitee in all actions based thereon with counsel satisfactory to the Indemnitee, and pay all charges of attorneys and all other costs and expenses of any kind arising from any said liability, damage, loss, claim, demand, or action. No liability attaches to the City by virtue of entering into this Agreement except as is expressly provided for under this Agreement. This provision survives the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement. Section 22. Artist' Warranties. A. Warranty Against Defects. Artist warrants that the Artwork is designed to last for 20 years, and guarantees the Artwork against faulty material and workmanship, including inherent vice, for 20 years. The term "inherent vice" means a quality within the material(s) that compromise(s) the Artwork and, either alone or in combination, results in the tendency of the Artwork to destroy itself and its image. In the event of a claim by the City for faulty material or workmanship, Artist shall, at the City's option, remedy or pay for any loss or damage resulting from faulty material or workmanship that occurs or appears after the date the City issues a Notice of Final Acceptance of the Artwork. The City shall give written notice with reasonable promptness to Artist regarding observed defects in the Artwork that occur or appear. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any action whatsoever by the City constitutes an acceptance of work not done in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement or relieves Artist of liability or responsibility for faulty material or workmanship. This provision survives the expiration of this Agreement. B. Warranty of Title. Artist warrants and guarantees that, upon the City's final remittance of payment to Artist, the City acquires good title to the Artwork and that the Artwork is free from any and all claims, liens, and charges of and by any person or entity including, but not limited to, all employees and suppliers of Artist. This provision survives the expiration of this Agreement. Page 6 of 15 Section 23. Collection Management. A. The City reserves the right to manage its collection of art, including the Artwork, consistent with all applicable laws, the City's Charter, ordinances, and municipal policies. The City, through this Agreement, is commissioning and purchasing a work of public art, and the City shall determine the Artwork's placement at the Project Premises. This reservation of rights survives the expiration of this Agreement. B. The City reserves the right to manage its buildings, facilities, and public sites for public purposes and, in doing so, may determine that it is necessary to relocate or remove the Artwork or modify the site in or on which it is located. This reservation of rights by the City survives the expiration of this Agreement. Section 24. Force Majeure. No party to this Agreement will be liable for failures or delays in performance due to any cause beyond their control including, but not limited to, any failures or delays in performance caused by strikes, lock outs, fires, acts of God or the public enemy, common carrier, severe inclement weather, and riots or interference by civil or military authorities. Artist shall inform the City in writing and submit proof of force majeure within three (3) business days of the event or occurrence of force majeure. Artist' failure to inform and submit proof to the City of force majeure constitutes a waiver of this right as a defense. The failures or delays to perform extend the period of performance until these exigencies have been removed. Section 25. Survival of Terms. Termination or expiration of this Agreement for any reason does not release either party from any liabilities or obligations set forth in this Agreement that: 1) the parties have expressly agreed survive the termination or expiration; 2) remain to be performed; or 3) by their nature would be intended to be applicable following the termination or expiration. Section 26. Non -Discrimination. Artist shall not discriminate or permit discrimination against any person or group of persons, as to employment or in the performance of services under this Agreement, on the grounds of race, religion, national origin, sex, physical or mental disability, or age, or in any manner prohibited by the laws of the United States or the State of Texas. The Director retains the right to take the action as the United States may direct to enforce this non- discrimination covenant. Section 27. Compliance with Laws. A. Artist must comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local government laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances that may be relevant or applicable to Artist' performance under this Agreement. B. This Agreement is also subject to applicable provisions of the City's Charter. Section 28. Venue. All actions brought to enforce compliance with this Agreement must be brought in Nueces County, Texas, where this Agreement was executed and will be performed. Section 29. Interpretation. This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. Page 7 of 15 Section 30. Notice. A. All notices, demands, requests, or replies provided for or permitted, under this Agreement by either party must be in writing and must be delivered by one of the following methods: (1) by personal delivery; (2) by deposit with the United States Postal Service as certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid; (3) by prepaid telegram; (4) by deposit with an overnight express delivery service, for which service has been prepaid; (5) by fax transmission; or (6) e-mail. B. Notice deposited with the United States Postal Service in the manner described above shall be deemed effective two (2) business days after deposit with the United States Postal Service. Notice by telegram or overnight express delivery service in the manner described above will be deemed effective one (1) business day after transmission to the telegraph company or overnight express carrier. Notice by fax or e-mail will be deemed effective upon transmission with proof of delivery to the receiving party. All communications must only be made to the following: IF TO CITY: City of Corpus Christi — Parks and Recreation Attn: Director 1201 Leopard; 3rd Floor P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9277 (361) 880-3464 (361) 880-3864 Fax IF TO ARTIST: Heye Mosaics LLC Attn: Jeremiah Heye 251 Lula Mae San Antonio, Texas 78219 (210) 452-5399 C. Either party may change the address to which notice is sent by using a method set out above. Artist shall notify City of an address change within ten (10) days after the address is changed. Section 31. Mechanics and Materialman's Liens. Artist must not allow the Artwork to be encumbered by any notice of intention to file a mechanic or materialman's lien or by the filing of a mechanic or materialman's lien. In the event that any notice of intention to file a mechanic or materialman's lien is received by Artist or a mechanic or materialman's lien is filed against the Artwork purporting to be for labor or materials, Artist must discharge the same within ten (10) days of the notice or filing. Section 32. Disputes. Any disputes concerning Artist' performance of this Agreement that are not disposed of by agreement between Artist and the Director will be referred to the City Manager or the City Manager's designated representative. If these persons do not agree upon a decision within a reasonable period of time not to exceed forty-five (45) days, the parties may pursue other legal rights and remedies to resolve the disputes. Section 33. Modification or Amendment. No modification or amendment of any of the terms of this Agreement will be effective unless the modification or amendment is in writing and signed by an authorized representative of each of the parties to this Agreement. Page 8 of 15 Section 34. Waiver. A. The failure of either party to complain of any act or omission on the part of the other party, no matter how long the same may continue, will not be deemed a waiver by said party of any of its rights under this Agreement. B. No waiver of any covenant or condition or of the breach of any covenant or condition of this Agreement by either party at any time, express or implied, will be taken to constitute a waiver of any subsequent breach of the covenant or condition nor will justify or authorize the nonobservance on any other occasion of the same or any other covenant or condition of this Agreement. C. If any action by Artist requires the consent or approval of the City on one occasion, any consent or approval given on said occasion will not be deemed a consent or approval of the same action or any other action on any other occasion. D. Any waiver or indulgence of Artist' default of any provision of this Agreement will not be considered an estoppel against the City. It is expressly understood that, if at any time Artist are in default in any of its conditions or covenants of this Agreement, the failure on the part of the City to promptly avail itself of said rights and remedies that the City may have will not be considered a waiver on the part of the City, but the City may at any time avail itself of said rights or remedies allowed under this Agreement, in law, or in equity. E. Any waiver or indulgence of the City's default of any provision of the Agreement will not be considered an estoppel against the Artist. It is expressly understood that, if at any time the City is in default in any of its conditions or covenants of this Agreement, the failure on the part of the Artist to promptly avail themselves of said rights and remedies that the Artist may have will not be considered a waiver on the part of the Artist, but the Artist may at any time avail themselves of said rights or remedies allowed under this Agreement, in law, or in equity. Section 35. Severability. A. If, for any reason, any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, provision, phrase, or word of this Agreement or the application hereof to any person or circumstance is, to any extent, held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future law or by a final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, then the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of said term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, for it is the definite intent of the parties to this Agreement that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, provision, phrase, or word hereof be given full force and effect for its purpose. B. To the extent that any clause or provision is held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future law effective during the term of this Agreement, in lieu of each illegal, invalid, or unenforceable clause or provision, a clause or provision, as similar in terms to the illegal, invalid, or unenforceable clause or provision as may be possible and be legal, valid, and enforceable, will be added to this Agreement automatically. Section 36. Acknowledgment and Construction of Ambiguities. The parties expressly agree that they have each independently read and understood this Agreement. By Artist' Page 9 of 15 execution of this Agreement, Artist agree to be bound by the terms, covenants, and conditions contained in this Agreement. By agreement of the parties, any ambiguities in this Agreement may not be construed against the drafter. Section 37. Captions. The captions utilized in this Agreement are for convenience only and do not in any way limit or amplify the terms or provisions of this Agreement. Section 38. Disclosure of Interests. Artist agrees to comply with City of Corpus Christi Ordinance No. 17112 and complete the Disclosure of Interests form as part of this contract. Artist agrees to comply with Texas Government Code section 2252.908 and complete Form 1295 Certificate of Interested Parties as part of this contract. For more information, please review the information on the Texas Ethics Commission website at https://www.ethics.state.tx.us. Artist agrees to comply with Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Government Code and file Form CIQ with the City Secretary's Office, if required. For more information and to determine if you need to file a Form CIQ, please review the information on the City Secretary's website at http://www.cctexas.com/government/city-secretary/conflict- disclosure/index. Section 39. Executory Agreement. This Agreement is not considered valid until signed by authorized representatives of each of the parties and approved by the City Council. Section 40. Entire Agreement. No verbal agreements or conversations between any officer, employee, or agent of the City and Artist or Artist' agent prior to the execution of this Agreement affect or modify any of the terms or obligations contained in this Agreement. Any verbal agreements or conversations prior to execution of this Agreement are considered unofficial information and in no way binding on either party. This Agreement and the attached and incorporated exhibits constitute the entire agreement between the City and Artist for the purpose stated. All other agreements, promises, representations, and understandings, oral or otherwise, with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement, unless contained in this Agreement, are expressly revoked, as the parties intend to provide for a complete understanding within the provisions of this Agreement and its exhibits of the terms, conditions, promises, and covenants relating to Artist' performance under this Agreement. EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE, each of which will be considered an original, on this the day of , 2017. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI Margie C. Rose City Manager Rebecca Huerta City Secretary APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM _ 2017 Lisa Aguilar, Assistant City Attorney ARTIST By: Printed Title: Alka „Nq� C Date: yiV/1-\-} Page 10 of 15 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF Itkal This instrumenl vas acknowledged before me on /141 ,g , 2017, by ZitriDA\ mire. as for Hays Mosaics, LLC. Notary Public, State of Texas My Commission Expires LIST OF ATTACHED EXHIBITS Exhibit A: Artwork Plans and Specifications Exhibit B: Insurance Requirements lC-I-A LAP otary's Pnnted Name ADAM RYAN FELIAI Notary Public STATE OP TEXAZ My Comm Exp. O4:30J2021 UN 12040s$40 Page 11 of 15 EXHIBIT A Fire Station No. 18 Public Art Three tile mosaics attached to the exterior: • 8 x 12 foot image of a Corpus Christi Fire Fighter in bunker gear entering a fire • Approximately 2.5 x 2.5 foot mosaic of the Corpus Christi Fire Department's Patch • Approximately 2.5 x 2.5 foot mosaic of the Corpus Christi Maltese Cross • Mosaic 8'x12' 11'-7318 ,5-0114 *ft: FIELE VENVI t.L U EP6FONS FICA ` !1+F* IdrlLLAT10M PARTIAL EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE V1' EXHIBIT A Fire Station No. 18 Public Art 40.-4 5/8- 4"-7 1/4" 18" 4"-71/4" 1-6 i7 14'-10 4'-7 1/4" U7 Page 12 of 15 Maltese Cross Fire Department Patch Page 13 of 15 EXHIBIT B INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS I. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY INSURANCE A. Contractor must not commence work under this contract until all insurance required has been obtained_and such insurance has been approved by the City. Contractor must not allow any subcontractor, to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. B. Contractor must furnish to the City's Risk Manager and Park & Recreation Director one (1) copy of Certificates of Insurance with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies by endorsement, and a waiver of subrogation endorsement is required on GL, AL and WC if applicable. Endorsements must be provided with Certificate of Insurance. Project name and/or number must be listed in Description Box of Certificate of Insurance. TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -day advance written notice of cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination required on all certificates and policies. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises — Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury- Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non -Owned 3. Rented/Leased $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit WORKERS' S COMPENSATION (All States Endorsement if Company is not domiciled in Texas) Employers Liability Statutory and complies with Part II of this Exhibit. $500,000/$500,000/$500,000 Page 14 of 15 TRANSPORTATION / INSTALLATION INSURANCE To be provided by person or entity providing the transportation and installation of the artwork 1. During the transportation to and installation of the artwork at the Site In amounts sufficient to cover the replacement cost of the artwork C. In the event of accidents of any kind related to this contract, Contractor must furnish the Risk Manager with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. II. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Applicable for paid employees, Contractor must obtain workers' compensation coverage through a licensed insurance company. The coverage must be written on a policy and endorsements approved by the Texas Department of Insurance. The workers' compensation coverage provided must be in statutory amounts according to the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation. An All States Endorsement shall be required if Contractor is not domiciled in the State of Texas. B. Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Contractor's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- VII. C. Contractor shall be required to submit renewal certificates of insurance throughout the term of this contract and any extensions within 10 days of the policy expiration dates. All notices under this Exhibit shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Risk Manager P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 D. Contractor agrees that, with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: • List the City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, as additional insureds by endorsement with regard to operations, completed operations, and activities of or on Page 15 of 15 behalf of the named insured performed under contract with the City, with the exception of the workers' compensation policy; • Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; • Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City; and • Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any, cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination in coverage and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. E. Within five (5) calendar days of a cancellation, non -renewal, material change or termination of coverage, Contractor shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Contractor's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. F. In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Contractor's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Contractor to stop work hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. G. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contractor's or its subcontractor' s performance of the work covered under this contract. H. It is agreed that Contractor's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self-insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this contract. I. It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this contract. 2017 Insurance Requirements Parks and Recreation Tile Mural Art Installation at Fire Station No. 18 05/01/2017 sw Risk Management CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 14="] Corn;feie Nos. 1 4 and 6 if there cm imerested parties Cornptete Nos. 1.2 3 5 and 6 d there are no interested panics. CERTIFICATION OFFICE USE ONLY OF FILING Number: Filed: Acknowledged: 1 Name of Waimea, entity fliing town, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place 01businees, heye mosaics Ibc san cn1onio TX United Status Certificate 2017.208870 Data 05117/2017 Date 2 Name eof governmental entity or state agency that is a parry to ire wruraci for which the torrn is beingciy of corpus chrlsti g Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or soya agency to track or identity the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. 111 mosaic tile 4 Name of Interested Party . City. State, Country (place of badness) Nature of Interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary City of Corpus Christi Corpus Christi TX United States — X heye, jerIm ah son antonio, TX United States X 5 Check only It there Is NO Interested Party. 0 tl AFFIDAVIT AFFIX Stam 20 i mew. or affirm, under penalty et penury, that the above klsrlaawe is irue and cofroci. . r. . ► ' _� ADAM RYAN FRIA /Ph. Notary Public STATS OF Tam mComm. y Co04130/2021 r.A. torr t if84tlii�0 ► Si ,•` :. . , r, , ;::: ret of con acting business entity / 3e 1'e w4+vlr•.• ,-,14... , this khe i 0 day of 161411 , NOTARY STAMP 1 SEAL ABOVE to and Babeafeed before me. by the said 11 , to certry v1iich, r.eness my hand and seal of afli a, MO" 1 (LA4, LEA) was Signature Oar dqg,Printed name of afloat admut1stonnp oath Title of elver admi i eying Dash sine t,%ww.etrtics.state.tx.us Version V1..O1S3 EXHIBIT A Fire Station No. 18 Public Art Three tile mosaics attached to the exterior: • 8 x 12 foot image of a Corpus Christi Fire Fighter in bunker gear entering a fire • Approximately 2.5 x 2.5 foot mosaic of the Corpus Christi Fire Department's Patch • Approximately 2.5 x 2.5 foot mosaic of the Corpus Christi Maltese Cross Mosaic 8'x12' CO 4 11'-7 3/8' MOM: FIELD VERIFY ALL DMEIISIONS MOOR TO ART K1STALLAIION PARTIAL EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: I'4' ■1'-0' l 5'-0 1/4"1, EXHIBIT A Fire Station No. 18 Public Art 40'-4 518" 4'-7 114"� 14-1D' 14"-10" /4'-7 114" Maltese Cross Fire Department Patch Sec. 2-109. - Municipal public art program. (a) Purpose. The City of Corpus Christi accepts responsibility for expanding the opportunities for its citizens to experience art in public places. The city also recognizes the substantial economic benefits to be gained through the enhancement of tourism. A policy is therefore established to direct the inclusion of works of art in certain city construction projects or other city owned properties and to encourage the inclusion of works of art in private developments in the City of Corpus Christi. (b) Definitions. For the purposes of this section: Art selection panel means a committee which may be established by the commission on an ad hoc basis to assist the commission in administering, procuring, or incorporating artwork with a particular city construction project. Arterial street means streets identified as arterials in the master transportation plan. City construction project means any capital project paid for wholly or in part by funds appropriated by the city council to construct or remodel a building, parking facility, park, arterial street, sidewalk, or any portion thereof. Construction cost means the total city -funded portion of a city construction project less demolition costs, equipment costs, and real property acquisition costs. Demolition costs means payments for any work needed for the removal of buildings or other existing structures from city property. Equipment costs means payments for any equipment or furnishings that are portable and of standard manufacture. Equipment shall not mean items that are custom designed for, or that create a new use for, a facility, whether portable or affixed. Real property acquisition costs means payments made for the purchase of parcels of land, existing buildings or structures, and costs incurred by the city for appraisals or negotiations in connection with such purchase. Visual arts committee means a standing committee of the commission which reviews the suitability of artwork, recommendations of art selection panels, and monitors the continued implementation of the commission's procedures, guidelines, and recommendations for the municipal public art program. The visual arts committee shall report directly to and make recommendations to the commission. Works of art or artwork shall mean any form of original, permanent creation of visual art which shall include, but not be limited to: (1) Paintings of all media such as frescoes and murals; (2) Sculptures, in any material or combination of materials, for ornamentation or commemoration such as statues, monuments, fountains, arches, bas-reliefs, mobiles, or kinetic, electronic, and neon sculptures; and (3) Other forms such as inscriptions, stained glass, fiber works, carvings, mosaics, photography, drawings, collages, textile works, prints, or decorative or utilitarian crafts utilizing clay, fiber, wood, metal, glass, stone, plastic, and other materials. (c) Funds for works of art. (1) Allocations. All allocations for funds for city construction projects shall include an amount equal to one and one-quarter (1Y4) per cent of the construction cost, to be used for the selection, acquisition, commissioning, and display of works of art and any other associated costs such as professional fees, community education, insurance, curatorial services, identification, documentation and publicity. If the source of funding, applicable law governing any particular project, or the expenditure of such funds precludes art as permissible expenditure, the amount of funds so restricted shall be excluded from the construction cost, as defined herein, in determining the amount to be allocated as provided herein. City construction projects with a Page 1 construction cost of less than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) shall be excepted, and no allocation shall be made on such projects. Eligible city construction projects for operational facilities that are not visited by the public on a routine basis nor designed for public access shall not have publicly funded interior artwork, but the exterior of such facilities remain eligible for artwork. Concurrent with the appropriation to fund a related city construction project, the city council shall appropriate funds as specified herein and request the municipal arts commission to appoint an art selection panel for the project. Separate accounts shall be established whenever funds are required to be used at a designated city construction project. Except for the following city construction projects approved by voter referendum on April 5, 1986, namely the police station and municipal court facility, airport terminal interior: treatment of ceilings and lighting and renovations of restrooms, development of unimproved parkland, and the recreation center, which shall be subject to the allocation for public art, all future appropriations for city's construction projects previously authorized by bond referendum prior to the effective date of this section shall be exempt from the allocation for public art. However, Relocation of Fire Station No. 1 shall be eligible for exterior public artwork. (2) Grant applications. From the effective date of this section, applications for capital projects to granting authorities shall include amounts for work of art as specified herein, insofar as permissible by the granting authority. (d) Uses of funds. Funds allocated in accordance with this section may be used for the selection, acquisition, purchase, commissioning, placement, installation, exhibition or display of works of art. The works of art shall be permanent, may be integral to the architecture, or may be placed in, on, or about a city construction project or other city property. To the extent practical, artist, selection should be concurrent with selection of the architect or designer, to ensure integration of the artwork into the project architecture. In the event that a particular city construction project is deemed inappropriate for the placement of artwork by the municipal art commission, if not otherwise prohibited by law, the funds appropriated for artwork shall be used at other more appropriate public sites. (e) Municipal arts commission responsibilities. (1) Program administration. The commission shall be responsible for advising the city manager and the city council on all aspects of the administration of the municipal public art program, including establishing policies and guidelines, designating sites, determining project budgets, selecting artists and commissioning artworks, reviewing the design, execution and placement of works of art and the removal of works of art from the city collection. The commission shall also direct appropriate citizen involvement in the selection process. Appropriate community education activities should be part of the placement of artworks under this section. Such activities may include, but are not limited to, exhibitions, workshops, artist residencies, dedications, and other programs designed to ensure public acceptance and enjoyment of the artworks. (2) Art selection panels. When requested by the art council the commission shall appoint art selection panels to utilize professionals in the visual arts and design fields as part of the artwork selection process to ensure artwork of the highest quality. Each panel shall have voting and nonvoting members as prescribed by the guidelines and rules of the commission. The art selection panels shall include members of the commission and others. It is within the sole discretion of the commission to select persons to be appointed to an art selection panel. Maintenance. The commission shall require that any recommended work of art needing extraordinary operation or maintenance costs be accompanied with a fiscal note, detailing such extraordinary costs. Maintenance of the artwork under the various city departments' care shall be the responsibility of those departments, provided that all repairs and maintenance of artworks by city departments or any other person or agency shall have the prior consultation with the commission. (3) Page 2 Such repair and maintenance shall comply with any contractual obligations which may have been entered into upon the acquisition of those artworks. The commission shall, at least annually, conduct a survey of the entire city -owned artwork collection. Such survey shall be submitted to the city council and shall include a review of the condition of each artwork in the collection and shall contain recommendations for the care and maintenance of the artworks, along with the estimated cost thereof. Annually, the city council shall make available such sums for the maintenance of the city collections as it deems appropriate. (4) Gifts and donations. The commission shall have further responsibility for reviewing and recommending for approval any artworks proposed to be donated to the city. The commission shall establish such policies and guidelines as may be appropriate to facilitate and encourage the donation of works of art of high quality to the city. Style. The public art program is not intended to support exclusively works of art of any particular school, style, taste or medium. The commission shall ensure that, over time, the city collection shall represent a broad range of artistic styles, tastes and media. (5) (Ord. No. 19663, § 1, 3-10-1987; Ord. No. 21435, § 1, 7-14-1992) Page 3 AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of June 13, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of June 20, 2017 DATE: May 25, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager markvv@cctexas.com (361) 826-3897 Valerie H. Gray, P. E., Executive Director of Public Works valerieg©cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: Jeff H. Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 CAPTION: Construction Contract and Land Acquisition Creek View Drive Extension Bond 2014 Proposition 2 Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Max Underground Construction, LLC. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $308,720.50 for the Creek View Drive Extension project for the base bid and to execute a land acquisition purchase agreement for $94,000 with William E. McKinzie, Jr. Family Limited Partnership, and closing costs of $3,000. (Bond 2014 Proposition 2) PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is to obtain authority to execute a construction contract for the Creek View Drive Extension project and land acquisition purchase agreements for the required City right of way. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Bond 2014 Brochure description: "This project includes extending Creek View Drive to McKinzie Road" Project Scope: Creek View Drive is an existing 2 -lane roadway in the subdivision with the Tuloso-Midway Primary School that dead ends 400' short of McKinzie Road. The proposed extension to McKinzie Road will allow Creek View Drive to serve as a local collector to improve access and circulation for the neighborhood and school. The extended roadway will match the existing pavement section with one travel lane in each direction constructed of Hot -Mix Asphalt Concrete (HMAC) pavement with new curb & gutter, ADA compliant sidewalks and utility improvements. This project was developed with a single base bid. On March 22, 2017, the City received proposals from six (6) bidders and the bids are as follows: Contractor Base Bid MAX Underground Construction, LLC. Corpus Christi, Texas $308,720.50 Mako Contracting Corpus Christi, Texas 359,418.00 Ram-Bro Contracting, Inc. Robstown, Texas 400,605.50 JHABORES Construction Company, Inc. Corpus Christi, Texas 448,223.10 A. Ortiz Construction and Paving, Inc. Corpus Christi, Texas 472,157.51 J. Carroll Weaver Sinton, Texas 547,878.84 Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost $314,040.80 This project required land acquisition to extend Creek View Drive to McKinzie Road. The total cost of the land acquisition is $94,000 with a purchase price of $61,132.77 for the City right of way (ROW) plus $32,867.23 resulting from damages and there is an additional $3,000 in closing costs. The damages are a result of severing the property into two tracts which devalues the total market value of the properties. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize execution of a construction contract and real estate sales contract. (Recommended) 2. Do not authorize execution of a construction contract and/or a real estate sales contract. (Not Recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Maverick Engineering, Inc. is the design engineer that was selected for this project under RFQ 2013- 01. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Complies with statutory requirements for construction and real estate contracts. Conforms to FY 2016-2017 Street Capital Improvement Planning (CIP) Budget. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Street Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue X Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Project to Date Budget and Expenditures Current Year Future Years TOTALS Budget $63,300.00 $517,750.00 $581,050.00 Encumbered / Expended Amount 63,300.00 63,300.00 This item (Construction) 308,720.50 308,720.50 This item (Land Acquisition and closing costs) 97,000.00 97,000.00 Future Anticipated Expenditures This Project 83,546.50 83,546.50 BALANCE 0 $28,483 $28,483 Fund(s): Street Bond 2014, Proposition Two and Utilities CIP Comments: N/A RECOMMENDATION: City staff and Maverick Engineering, Inc. recommend the construction contract be awarded to Max Underground Construction, LLC. in the amount of $308,720.50 for the base bid and a real estate sales contract for $94,000 be executed with William E. McKinzie, Jr. Family Limited Partnership for the Creek View Drive Extension project. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Project Budget Location Map Presentation Form (2)1295 Letter of Recommendation Real Estate Sales Contract PROJECT BUDGET ESTIMATE Creek View Drive Extension BOND 2014 Proposition 2 PROJECT FUNDS AVAILABLE: Street BOND 2014 Proposition 2 $ 295,000 Storm Water CIP 138,450 Water CIP 143,450 Gas CIP 4,150 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $ 581,050 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction Fees: Construction (Max Underground Construction) THIS ITEM $ 308,721 Streets 141,802 Utilities 166,919 Water 83,784 Storm Water 79,525 Gas 3,610 Contingency (10%) 30,872 Construction Inspection and Testing Fees' 24,526 Construction Inspection (estimate) 10,000 Construction Phase - Materials Testing Services 14,526 Design, Geotechnical and Land Acquisition Fees' 158,396 Engineering Design (Maverick Engineering) Original and Amendment No. 1 49,411 Geo Technical Testing 10,035 Land Appraisal 1,950 Land Acq Contract (William E. McKinzie, Jr. Ltd Partnership) (THIS ITEM)94,000 Land Acq Contract Closing Costs (THIS ITEM) 3,000 Reimbursement Fees and Miscellaneous 30,052 Contract Administration (Eng. Svcs Admin/Finance/Capital Budget) 11,621 Engineering Services (Project Mgt/Constr Mgt) 17,431 Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 1,000 TOTAL $ 552,567 ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE 28,483 eopara St /A.48? U PROJECT LOCATION ierra Grande LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE Corpus Christi Project Number: E15122 Creek View Drive Extension Bond 2014 Prop 2 CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Creek View Drive Extension BOND 2014, Proposition 2 OICorpusti Engineering Council Presentation June 13, 2017 Project Location /6(3? CREEK VIEW DRIVE EXTENSION Corpus Christi co ,moo co -70 Corpus Chr sti Engineering Project Vicinity Corpus Chr ski Engineering Project Scope Col pas t'hr SFi Engineering • 400 LF HMAC extension of Creek View Drive to McKinzie Road • New curb & gutter and ADA sidewalks • Utility improvements include Water, Storm Water and Gas (by City Crews) Creek View Cross Sections Corpus Chr ski Engineering BUFFER ADA SIDEWALK TRAVEL LANES BUFFER ADA SIDEWALK Creek View Cross Sections Corpus Chr ski Engineering HOT MIX ASPHALT CONCRETE (HMAC) 2.5" HMAC 8" LIMESTONE BASE 12" COMPACTED SUBGRADE PRIME COAT "-GEOGRID Project Schedule Corp is Chr sti Engineering 2017 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Bid/Award Construction Construction Estimate: 60 days DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Property and Land Acquisition Division CreekView Drive Extension, Bond 2014 Project # E15122, Parcels 1 & 2, Wm. McKinzie Jr., F.L.P. Real Estate Sales Contract THE STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF NUECES This Contract is entered into by William E. McKinzie, Jr. Family Limited Partnership, herein called "Seller" and the CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, a Texas home rule municipal corporation, P.O. Box 9277, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas 78469-9277 herein called `Buyer". 1. Property. Seller for the consideration and under the terms set out herein, agrees to convey to Buyer the surface estate only of the property described below together with all rights, privileges, and appurtenances pertaining to the property situated in Nueces County, Texas: PARCEL 1: A parcel of land containing 11,115.6 square feet (0.25 acres) as described by metes and bounds in the attached "Exhibit A (1 of 2)" and as shown on the map attached as "Exhibit A (2 of 2)", said parcel of land is described as being out of a 7.334 acre tract (5.788 acres remaining) described as Parcel 4 in Special Warranty Deed recorded as Document No. 2015012107, Official Records of Nueces County, Texas; said 7.334 acre tract being out the McKinzie 124.12 acre tract lying south of Up River Road and east of McKinzie Road and also being a portion of the McKinzie 388.26 acre tract of Survey 417, Patented to F.W. Schaeffer, Abstract 571, Survey 419, Patented to F.W. Schaeffer, Abstract 570, Survey 422, Patented to A.E. Spohn, Abstract 850, Nueces County, Texas. PARCEL 2: A parcel of land containing 11,115.6 square feet (0.25 acres) as described by metes and bounds in the attached "Exhibit B (1 of 2)" and as shown on the map attached as "Exhibit B (2 of 2)", said parcel of land is described as being out of a 7.334 acre tract (5.788 acres remaining) described as Parcel 4 in Special Warranty Deed recorded as Document No. 2015012107, Official Records of Nueces County, Texas; said 7.334 acre tract being out the McKinzie 124.12 acre tract lying south of Up River Road and east of McKinzie Road and also being a portion of the McKinzie 388.26 acre tract of Survey 417, Patented to F.W. Schaeffer, Abstract 571, Survey 419, Patented to F.W. Schaeffer, Abstract 570, Survey 422, Patented to A.E. Spohn, Abstract 850, Nueces County, Texas. 2. Purchase Price. $61.132.77 $32,867.23 $94,000.00 Property Value Damages to Remainder Cash to Seller at Closing Special Provisions. In addition to the consideration, the City will provide access to the southern tract by constructing one (1) sixteen (16) ft. driveway on Creek View Drive and one (1) sixteen (16) ft. driveway on McKinzie Road as shown on Exhibit A (2 of 2) and Exhibit B (2 of 2). The driveway on McKinzie Road shall be constructed only after the granting of a Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) Permit to Construct Access Driveway Facilities on Highway Right of Way (Form 1058) made by William E. McKinzie, Jr. The City will also construct two (2) drainage inlets as shown on the Sheet No. 17 of the constructions plans attached as Exhibit C. Existing fill dirt on the property removed for construction of the road and drainage improvements shall be relocated in the areas ofthe remainder directed by the Seller in coordination with City engineers and the Contractor. The seller will provide a temporary construction easement to allow the performance of this special provision in the attached Exhibit D (1 of 2) and as shown on the map attached as Exhibit D (2 of 2). In relocating the existing fill dirt and in grading along the east boundary line of the tract, the parties will use best efforts to provide grading that will permit drainage from both the north and south ends of the east boundary line toward the center of the east boundary line to attempt to eliminate flooding and provide drainage to the City's water drainage system installed on either side of its new road. 3. Title Insurance. The Seller must provide, at Buyer's expense, a title insurance policy that guarantees good and indefeasible title to the Property, without exceptions to title other than the standard printed exceptions and exceptions permitted under this Contract, and that wholly insures and indemnifies Buyer against any title defects or adverse claims. A reliable title insurance company or title guaranty company ("Title Company") must issue the title insurance policy. The title commitment for title insurance must be delivered to Buyer within 30 days after receipt of the Contract by the Title Company, with the title insurance policy to be timely issued after Closing. 4. Warranty Deed and Closing Costs. After securing the title insurance commitment, Seller must execute a Special Warranty Deed, drafted in accordance with the provisions of this Contract, that conveys indefeasible title to the Property to Buyer, and Buyer must make the cash payment. Buyer will pay all Closing Costs except costs to cure title, which must be paid by Seller. 2 5. Property Taxes. Seller must pay all property taxes incurred on the Property up to and including 2016. All property taxes for the year 2017, if any due and payable or incurred for the year, will be prorated between the Buyer and the Seller from January 1, 2017 to the date of Closing. The prorated taxes are only an estimate indicated by a Tax Certificate obtained by the Title Company and the Seller agrees to pay any shortages of property taxes should they occur during the following year. Seller shall promptly execute a Tax Proration Agreement expressly stating this agreement. 6. Earnest Money. Buyer deposits One Thousand Dollars and no cents ($1,000.00) with the Title Company as Earnest Money, which will be applied to the balance of the purchase price owing at Closing; Buyer will pay the balance of the purchase price owing at Closing. When the Title Company possesses the executed deed, any other necessary paperwork, and the balance of the cash payment, the Title Company will close and finalize the conveyance in accordance with its customary procedure. If Buyer fails to Close on this Contract as set out herein, for any reason other than title defects, Seller is entitled to the Earnest Money as liquidated damages for breach of this Contract. Seller may seek to enforce this Contract by an action for specific performance. If Seller fails to tender an executed deed conveying the Property in accordance with the terms of this Contract, Buyer may seek to enforce this Contract by an action for specific performance. 7. Restrictions on Title. Except for a restriction on title that would prohibit the use of the Property as a public road, Buyer accepts title to the Property subject to all recorded restrictive covenants and use restrictions, if any, and all applicable City zoning regulatory ordinances, if any. 8. Time for Performance. This transaction will be closed and completed through the Title Company on or before 120 days from the effective date this Contract is approved by City Council and executed by the City Manager or his designee. Seller gives Buyer possession of the Property by executing the Special Warranty Deed. Seller's execution of this Contract means that Seller has read and understands that this Contract is not binding on Buyer until approved and accepted by the City of Corpus Christi City Council and executed by the City Manager of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, or designee. Buyer must execute this Contract within 90 days from the date of Seller's execution of this Contract or this Contract is void. 9. Survives Closing. This Contract survives Closing of the sale of the Property and the delivery of the Special Warranty Deed and other necessary documents by Seller to Buyer at Closing, and all terms and conditions remain in effect between Seller and Buyer. 10. 60 -Day Inspection Period. Buyer shall have sixty (60) days (the "60 -Day Inspection Period") from the effective date of the contract hereof to notify Seller of Buyer's election, in Buyer's sole discretion, to cancel this Contract and receive a refund of the Earnest Money in 3 The event that Buyer finds the Property to be unacceptable for any reason. Buyer shall have reasonable access to the Property during all normal business hours and Seller agrees to cooperate with and assist Buyer in Buyer's inspection of the Property. Failure of Buyer to deliver to Seller, within the 60 -Day Inspection Period, written notice of Buyer's determination that the Property is unacceptable and to terminate this Contract shall constitute an election by Buyer to proceed with this Contract and a waiver of Buyer's right to terminate this Contract on this basis. a. Right of Entry. (1) During the 60 -Day Inspection Period, and at Buyer's sole expense, Buyer or Buyer's authorized agents shall have the right to enter upon the Property for purposes of making such land surveys, environmental site analysis, engineering studies, wetland studies, soil borings and soil analysis as Buyer may deem necessary. Buyer shall not cause or permit damage or injury to the Property. Upon termination of this Contract, Buyer shall promptly restore the Property to the condition existing prior to any tests or studies conducted pursuant to this Contract. This obligation shall survive the termination of this Contract, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein. Seller shall make available for Buyer's inspection and copying within ten (10) days from the date hereof all reports, studies and tests in Seller's possession with respect to the Property. (2) In connection with Buyer's inspections, studies, and assessments, Buyer must: (i) employ only trained and qualified inspectors and assessors; (ii) notify Seller, in advance, of when the inspectors or assessors will be on the Property; (iii) abide by any reasonable entry rules or requirements that Seller may require; (iv) not interfere with existing operations or occupants of the Property; and (v) restore the Property to its original condition if altered due to inspections, studies, or assessments that Buyer completes or causes to be completed. b. Environmental Condition of Property. Definitions. "Environmental Law" shall mean any law relating to environmental conditions and industrial hygiene applicable to the Property, including without limitation, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the Clear Air Act, the Clear Water Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Endangered Species Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Texas Water Code, the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act, and all similar applicable federal, state and local environmental statutes, ordinances and the regulations, orders and decrees now or hereafter promulgated thereunder. "Hazardous Materials" shall mean any pollutant, toxic substance, hazardous waste, hazardous material, hazardous substance, or oil as defined in any Environmental Law existing as of the date hereof. 4 Environmental Audit. Buyer shall have the right to cause an independent environmental consultant chosen by Buyer, in Buyer's sole discretion, to inspect the Property, including but not limited to an Environmental Site Analysis (ESA) Phase I and Phase II, to determine the condition of the Property, the presence of any Hazardous Materials and any apparent violation of any Environmental Law (the "Environmental Audit") and to deliver a report describing the findings and conclusions of the Environmental Audit. The cost and expense of the Environmental Audit shall be borne by Buyer. If the Environmental Audit reveals, or at any time prior to closing Buyer otherwise becomes aware of the existence of any environmental condition or violation of any Environmental Law which Buyer is unwilling to accept or the Seller is unwilling to cure, Buyer shall have the right and option to cancel this Contract and receive a full return of the Earnest Money. 11. Broker Commission. Seller is responsible for payment of all Broker's fees and commissions incurred in connection with the sale of this property. Buyer has not incurred any Broker fees. 12. Possession. At the Closing, the Property will be conveyed free of the rights of possession of any third parties in or to the Property except for valid easements, if any, filed of record and currently in force and effect. 13. Representations and Warranties. By Seller. In order to induce Buyer to enter into this Contract, Seller makes the following representations and warranties all of which will be true and correct as of the date hereof and as of the date of closing: Authority,; No Conflict. Seller has the absolute and unrestricted right, power and authority to execute and deliver this Contract and the documents to be executed and delivered by Seller in connection with the closing of the transactions described in this Contract (such documents being collectively referred to herein as "Seller's Closing Documents") and to perform its obligations under this Contract and the Seller's Closing Documents. Seller shall present to the Buyer and/or the Title Company, if necessary, all reasonable evidence of such authority which may be requested by either of them. The execution and delivery of this Contract and Seller's Closing Documents, the consummation of the transactions described herein, and compliance with the terms of this Contract will not conflict with, or constitute a default under, any agreement to which Seller is a party or by which Seller or the Property is bound, or violate any regulation, law, court order, judgment, or decree applicable to Seller or the Property, except as otherwise expressly provided herein. No Litigation or Proceedings. Seller has no knowledge of any pending or threatened litigation, condemnation, or assessment affecting the Property. Environmental Representations. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, Seller has no knowledge that the Property contains Hazardous Materials (as defined in Section 10(b)), contains any underground storage tanks, or is not in full compliance with all Environmental Laws (as defined in Section 10(b)). 5 Title to Property. Seller has full and complete fee simple title to the Property, subject only to the liens and encumbrances, if any, disclosed on the Commitment or Survey to be furnished to Buyer hereunder. No Options. No person, corporation, or other entity has or, on the date of Closing, shall have any right or option to acquire the Property. Compliance. Seller has not received any notice from any governmental agency regarding the Seller's or the Property's non-compliance with applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, statutes, rules and restrictions relating to the Property. 14. Mineral Reservation. The sale of the Property is without minerals. Seller reserves unto itself all of its right, title and interest in and to the oil, gas and other minerals in, on, or under the Property. Seller may neither construct nor operate, nor allow for others to construct or operate, a well or other drilling or extraction device on the Property. Seller shall execute a no -drilling agreement, prepared by Buyer, to ensure that Seller will neither construct or operate, nor allow for the construction or operation of, a well or other drilling or extraction device on the Property while exercising Seller's or any other individual or corporate person's right to recover any subsurface oil, gas, or other minerals. Seller agrees that any exercise of any right to recover any subsurface oil, gas, or other minerals may not interfere with the rights of the public for use of the Property as a roadway. Seller acknowledges that compliance with this paragraph may require of Seller or any other party to exercise a right to recover subsurface oil, gas or other minerals by use of directional drilling or other methods. 15. Essential. Time is of the essence in closing this transaction. 16. Effective Date. The effective date of this Real Estate Sales Contract is the date in which the Contract is signed by the Buyer. 17. Each person signing this contract represents and warrants that they have authority to execute this contract on behalf of their governing bodies and legally bind the parties. 6 Executed in triplicate, any of which constitutes an original. SELLER The William E. McKinzie, Jr. Family Limited Partnership By: hX cl.,r f lc C UI William E. McKinzie, General P ner of The William E. McKinzie, Jr. Family Limited Partnership as amended THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF tt ec e This instrument was acknowledged before me on `79--)f� / 1 , 2017 by William E. McKinzie, Jr., General Partner, for the William E. McKinzie, Jr., Family Limited Partnership. [Seal] Notary 7ublic in and for the State of Texas CYNTHIA DE LEON My Commission Expires August 4, 2018 NOTARY ID# 675547-9 7 1403) 3(1 A11-1TVY3 29'ti4x3 fOt2a iff tit7G.`0 M` `` OR ct. fells. 1; 0-MirceYHAT0ir! BUYER CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS By: Valerie H. Gray, P. E. Executive Director of Public Works THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF NUECES § This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 2017 by Valerie H. Gray, P. E., as Executive Director of Public Works for the City of Corpus Christi, a Texas municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public in and for the State of Texas [Seal] APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM THIS Z Y� DAY OF " "`"'l . 2017, FOR THE CITY ATTORNEY 104.d Aimee Alcorn -Reed Assistant City Attorney J:1GEN1CreekView Drive Extension — E15122 — RESC_McKinzie.Parcel 1.doc 8 Parcel I El 5122 — Creek View Drive Extension 30' Wide Right -Of -Way STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NUECES BEUNU the North one -Mica's 60.0 foot wide tract of land, containing 11,115.6 square feet (11.25 acres) (Aland out of a 7.334 acre tract (5.788 acres remaining) described as Parcel 4 in Special Warranty Deed recorded as Document no. 2015012107, Official Records of Nueces County, Texas; said 7.334 acre tract being out of the McKinzie 124.12 acre tract lying south of Up River Road and east of McKinzie road and also being a portion of the McKinzie 388.26 acre tract of Survey 417, Patented to F.W. Schaeffer, Abstract 571, Survey 419, Patented to F.W. Schaeffer, Abstract 570, Survey 422, Patented to A.E. Spohn, Abstract 850, Nueces County, Texas. This 11,115.6 square foot tract being more fully described by metes and bounds as follows: Commencing at a 5/8 inch iron rod found on the east boundary of McKinzie Road for the northwest corner of Lot 3, Block 7, Highway Village Section 1 Annex, a map of which is recorded in Volume 65, Page 193, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas; Thence, with the easterly extension of the north boundary ofsaidLot 3, Block 7, Highway Village Section 1 Annex, North 8I00418" West 10.00 feet; Thence, with the existing east boundary of McKinzie Road, parallel with its centerline and 40.00 feet distant therefrom, North 08°53'55" East, a distance of 313.10 feet to the intersection of said east boundary of McKinzie Road with the westerly projection of the centerline of existing Creek View Drive, a 60 foot wide public roadway, for the Point of Beginning of this description and for the southwest corner (no monumentation found or set) of this tract; Thence, with west boundary of this tract, same being the existing east boundary of McKinzie Road, parallel with its centerline and 40.00 feet distant therefrom, North 08°53'55" East, a distance of 55.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with City of Corpus Christi cap set for the northwest corner of this tract; Thence, with the north boundary of this tract, South 36°05'49" East, a distance 0135.36 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with City of Corpus Christi cap set for a corner of this tract; Thence, continuing with the north boundary of this tract, South 81°05'49" East, a distance of 335.11 feet to a 5/8" iron rod found for the northwest corner of existing Creek View Drive, for the southwest comer of Lot 1, Block 1, Maple Hills Subdivision Unit 5, a map of which is recorded in Volume 67, Page 160, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas and for the northeast corner of this tract; Thence, with the west boundary of said existing Creek View Drive, same being the east boundary of this tract, South 08°56'10" West, a distance of 30.00 feet for southeast corner (no monumentation Lound or set) of this tract; Thence, with the south boundary of this tract, same being the westerly projection of the centerline of said Creek View Drive, North 81°05'49" West, a distance of 360.09 feet the east boundary of said McKinzie Road to the Point of Beginning and containing 11,115.6 square feet (0.25 acres) of land. Bearings based on GPS bearings, Texas State Plane Coordinate System, NAD 83 (2011), South Zone. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NUECES 1, Russell D. Ochs, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor, hereby certify that the foregoing field notes were prepared by me from a land survey made on the ground under my supervision. 'This the 20th day of April, 2017 atovevet J), 1. Russell D. Ochs, R.P.L.S. State of Texas License No. 5241 lFygin g\S, i PROIECISUN•Es5I -CREEK VIEW oa EXTE 7Stott.m15Wind boam+mu IN.EIS Exhibit A 1of2 S 8113'!9'E ear 35 60.00' 4a • FD, 5/8• IR. X000 mactlee rA_ocAc Or VA- 59, Pe ts0146T 7 fo-04 50.00' 1 --zv_ ETTYSSUR STREET F. o Oj V r� ,!1 12 La 0 Zz 4.17z)z F0. 5/8' LEL 11 6 "POINT OF BEGINNING" FOR PARCEL 1 RIGHT-OF-WAY LOT 'IA APPROXIMATE DRIVEWAY LOCATION AS PER MDT PERMIT APPLICATION DATED MARCH 16. 2017 N erve•rr w 10.00• "POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 40. 10' MADE SOUTHWESTERN BELL EASEMENT DOC. NO. 894182. OPRNCT FUTURE RMGHr-OF-WAY S 3605'49" E 35.36' SEs s/r LR. MIH 'CITY OF CORPUS a16511- CAP 5 81'05'49" 11,115.6 S.F. (0.25 ACRES) E 335.11 ' PROPOSED F0. 5/r LIT. 5 4 3 _t 1 1 PARCEL 1 �1.( NO Mo1a01ENTA11ON N 81.7bz5 . 1 (FOUND ce s 500' 11 11 11 X11 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY 11 W 360.09' PROPOSED DRIVEWAY SET s/e' tA. MRH 'CITY OF CORPUS affair CAP YaET S 5354'1 1 " W Fii DeeP �� 50.00' IiISHWAY VL ASE SEG. I ( FD. s/0.' R R FLOCK 1, LO V 3 VOL 65, P6-0193' MRN61- 100 MAP TO ACCOMPANY FLELDNOTES FOR TOR NORM OP A 50.00 FOOT .,DR TRACTW LAIW. CONMEING 11.116.6 mum Zig! (0.28 ACM) O? LLQ 00T 6? A 7.894 MS 26&C1' (6.788 ACRES 11222111152) MORD= A8 PAiIRIII. 4 IN SPECIAL WARRANTY DM MORD= A8 D0cO1m71T No. 2816618107. OFFICIAL REDIOM 0? NM= comm. 7XLXIA$ BUD 7.864 AI$i TRACT IMO 00T D? T R IMMO 18412 Aft lR4t.'Z LYB(O 800ffi OP OP MR ROAD AHD 248! 0? NAM= ROAD AHD ALSO MEG A FORME 0? THE ITalMOSEC 288.25 AM sue! op awn 417. PAITINTED TO P.T. 8c!!Al?Y28. A$8!$AC! 571. SORVST 419. PM= 1"0 P.V. 8126W, ABSTRACT 679. BOItvST 428 AND MEMO TO A.R. MBA MISTRALT 850. 8UECiB CREEK SIDE DRIVE I $ CREEK VIEW c) DRIVE 4 FD. LR. BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON GPS T S STATE PLANE COORDWATE SYSIEK TEXAS ZONE 200 300 17 � a aestron Remand proposed 17 Reamed TCE & added proposed ddveeaya & Wets 18 Added Eemp rory mns*UCElon easement 15 Chanced comes for fbv a! Ireeraa'fbe CITY of CORPUS CHRISM, TEXAS' Capital Programs Survey Division 361-826-3551 Data: 2/17/2017 Damn By; AS Cached By: R1.011 ! SH iT 1 of 1 Project E75122 -CREEK VIEW DR. EVE:BON It1 a vlstiwAPR1 ATC1s1•pr-E15122-CREEK IiEw DEE EXTENSION -201A .R7-E151Z2-CREDI VIEW DR 0006101-201.I,aty Exhibit A 2 of 2 Parcel 2 E15122 - Creek View Drive Extension 30' Wide Right -Of -Way STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NUECES BEING the South one-half of a 60.0 foot wide tract of land, containing 11,114.9 square feet (0.25 acres) of land out of a 7.334 acre tract (5.788 acres remaining) described as Parcel 4 in Special Warranty Deed recorded as Document no. 2015012107, Official Records of Nueces County, Texas; said 7.334 acre tract being out of the McKinzie 124.12 acre tract lying south of Up River Road and east of McKinzie road and also being a portion of the McKinzie 388.26 acre tract of Survey 417, Patented to F.W. Schaeffer, Abstract 571, Survey 419, Patented to F.W. Schaefer, Abstract 570, Survey 422, Patented to A.E. Spohn, Abstract 2150, Nueces County, Texas. l his 11,114.9 square foot tract being more fully described by metes and bounds as follows: Commencing at a 5/8 inch iron rod found on the east boundary of McKinzie Road for the northwest corner of Lot 3, Block 7, Highway Village Section 1 Annex, a map of which is recorded in Volume 65, Page 193, Map Records of Nueces County, Texas; Thence, with the easterly extension ot the north boundary of said Lot 3, Block 7, Highway Village Section 1 Annex, North 81'114't8" West 10.00 feet; Thence, with the existing east boundary of McKinzie Road, parallel with its centerline and 40.00 feet distant therefrom, North 08.53'55" East, a distance of 258.11 feet to a 518 inch iron rod with City of Corpus Christi cap set for the Point of Beginning of this description and for the southwest corner of this tract; Thence, with west boundary of this tract, same being the existing east boundary of McKinzie Road, parallel with its centerline and 40.00 feet distant therefrom, North 08`'53'55" East, a distance of 55.00 feet for the northwest corner (no monumentation found or set) of this tract; thence, with the north boundary ot this tract, same being the westerly projection of the centerline of existing Creek View Drive, a 60 foot wide public roadway, South 81°05'49" East, a distance of360.09 feet to the west boundary of said Creek View Drive, for the northeast corner (no monumentation found or set) of this tract; Thence, with the west boundary of said existing Creek View Drive, same being the east boundary of this tract, South 08°56' 10" West, a distance of 30.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found for the southwest corner of said Creek View Drive and for the southeast corner of this tract; Thence, with the south boundary of this tract, North 81°05'49" West, a distance of 335.07 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with City of Corpus Christi cap set fora corner of this tract; "Thence, continuing with the south boundary of this tract, South 53°54' t In West, a distance o13536 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 11,114.9 square feet (0.25 acres) of land. Bearings based on GPS bearings, Texas State Plane Coordinate System, NAD 83 (2011), South Zone. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF NUECES 1, Russell D. Ochs, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor, hereby certify that the foregoing field notes were prepared by me from a land survey made on the ground under my supervision. This the 20th day of April, 2017 uesev I. 01, Russell D. Ochs, R.P.L.S. State of Texas License No. 5241 K: tEnairsaringtSurveyWROIECrSUN•E15I22•cREEK VIEW Dft EX NSION-zal Wual D000centskIN•EIs172 - .:a � DN l -parcel 2+20-2017.d°oc Page I o1 1 RUSSELL D. OCHS Exhibit B 1 of 2 KREngOteeNE915urvvy1PROlECTSUN•E15122•CREEK VIEW DR EXTENSKIN•2015ON•E15122•CREEK VIEW DR EXTENSION•2015.dwg. M&5 EXHIBIT -PARCEL 2 -SCALE 104 5/16/201711]652 AM. HP0100 017500 E914 U !PAO 14!INt§. 1109 0 n TJ p 2 Fo rn rn rn x S. ser 5/5' LR. 107H 'an OP CORPUS war coo H 053535' E 455.11' JAGCS I WOODS r(W IVI5IDN UNIT I VOL. . P6. �ANG� McKINZIE ROAD N oeas555 E Ln LR N 08'5355" E 5500' \.P41.)_ o, _ g P, 11 -4 .d rN ?' ago Lam. CJ1• ' SET 5/0' LR. 10tH 'GiY Or CORPUS CHEW CAP es $ ;o it, VII 1,21) 5 05'55'10' R 40.120' N 0053'55' £ Misr/ =--r a 4.6 G 2 5 06'56'10" W (7 N W N m € vx 73 pi g CREEK SIDE DRIVE Oi MAPLE I111.5 SIIVISION UNIT VOL. 07, P. WO, Ml�1LT J g L003 1 01/011.1 4.10 6.0-,m9ATI:4.1 0 WSW arm 1 i JIM N I 4 / i 4 1 3 001111 0010 00,0L 00.9 MATCHLINE STA. 9+00 S 8 8 S 2 ur.-IM'inif-5117611 , 01 .01.• • . :1-1V;/S .0r 04 0-1 g 8. _ IQ 0O 0 l,l. , 50)03 nis 0311 .02 1,451 .d084 " '43 PLAN & PROFILE STA. 5+50 TO STA. 9+00 - aux wit S 9.001.3.1...-0.0EIMI MO Mutt • 1 ] CREEK VIEW EXTENSION (BOND 2014) ..,., ..,•' / ..' I , I , , 09 ._-.-% --- .1%, -77 e :...', ''''' ... --ii-ti .i....,..,,,:t. (3113010 MP 31.01 ,r-aa-364;:k;',,/,..1, .......----r-3--iimtiscr:tratma--- 3":4[7.3t 4:11 , one zr 7136a-t wad .1110±11 10 131119 Issao )35__ - -/- NO0331003 1333S 3403 '31033-...„ t ; 09 -, 4 --- -- ---4 t'..- 11.4 VA 67 RAYIST1,4:1':.2i1N. 3*112'40 eci .eona --- - 31 01S-0,. 0...60.13SZ . . 5,1 • "Alf> A .. •--i .. '00 :AA Gs '3T1 • ... 81 , •1101191113,13.1d rA NVld14144120 .4./LON,V4,2 '-g 3.7r410113CIS 0± 0))? 4213030 301101411. s3anun aamononim 01011953 3.453/. 01314 01 0013301403 3.11 40 .s.1110300a330 301 91 11 .5150 321001.13 [033 303 531111110 0/015103 .1,3 14003011110% ii eg ?..g--11- . .13 $ ; 3.. 4.1. IEm - - • 15103 1101,13137114. 1431-31.1 '11 130311001 01.10 lath .,.. - , .11,IX: . I t 1 CITY of CORPUS CHRISTI TEXAS Doommoni of Eogrootarktg Sc 30 1013631.03 Owl 11.30398 603 3330.00$30 S. 0013•410403 1113.110 00 0311019/9 3a 11.0 PM sea rot 211d0Eld NVld BOVNIVb1C1 CINV 1N31A13AVd V ll 1 , 4i i , ,,..- 1 ....-__, . IMAM .03..03 110000100)0 VAC SU 03303 rb i.,3;:s .., io 90.9 i,... ' ‘.1 I ..,,, . ,Onr...., 1 . r 31303,033 339140 3 3.40030 1 110333313 3119 13319 .,,,.5 32.10 00-0 30•111 13.0 031004 0301a 1.00,301 1.01913 1 1 11. : MAY. irrolaSv 1103 0431•11 Is .310.001 27013 Oi ±11.5 tlaS 190 . .rosa -330.9001 15913-341,1 33o '4 13 50 00a001 03003•33. AV 11 I 909 0015 OW 9/335 333a. 13191S__A ,.. 00 .rn ze i-t •e0.1 4'...'.1'1..1'111'11 11. .1 01,03 VS .01.,....,,,, .3. .. _ . 1. 1 : z I • 01.001 331,1 J1.t 1,00333/10.00 003 vi rau V ao a,.. -1. / •atst.t. ,,,, g viz t -ft- :. L (-1.1 ' IngliMa 1335 335 Wend ...33190 10001 .9 (.000.19.1.1 9319-00 131, ...• .. - / / 0 OE --1013° " '•4151' . i i /.L1333/.3 OO335 0031033.0 51 133300 E , • : 111/11 033dS 0.4.,a.11, , y ., oava.T ersi 1.,,.. 00 343379 9096301 .9..3•-1 3131 BIM Z1 '03003-30 ; . • . 11 1 I +0 03,011311 30 0/ Me 03403 , ' .,....000> 4. , ! i 060 ! g..) V.1: fil IP 1-1.4141 lif Eig .. ifil 0 • .IPP . .• i .1 • 11313300 XI 1.39 11 :-........: V, 4, C..‘ • . ".., . 3.13/13.403 MIMI OA 000332.0.03 1119 10010311 a/WM 1.-_-: Wig§ 0N '„-• _ :" IMIIM0.011 lirr. 40111 I 7'. '1 .."1" .. Wrenn 0191990 N.3301 .93091305 3134351033 0S0,10.90 .3 Z 141 St13,110 J.0) imn SYS .3 .000 m 143.4.3343,3110.3213,43.11,10. „ --- -- - --.--- -----.------ - - - - , . - -1 09•3 musg ci) ,.....„. --:- 311,0 3S3 F7S1 • 0 . (.0101±10)050..e, ir93t..9199- .,-03.1,. •.. . r , 1.g , , ... - ...,t . .-9-4 ;s-1,.. 011 8 1 , . r7rtcu00:0.s4s131,1f3,0P,4,r, , pi. -77,.. 43 1/43,93313 03193M11000I0M00 (-=I . ' ,9‘,. .i..,.n. ognaoa1121 , NM& . • ,- c;-Z 1 1313310 I1rI1 ..-T .... ' ,i 1 .., • , f, 1 ' I ' -' • . i 1 I • , i• ; 1 003-1221 TN 13001 IDS fATIIIWKO 1 avail emu* L i 1 1 sloth :alraen March 28, 2017 MAVERICK ENGINEERING, INC. Mr. Jeff Edmonds, P.E. Director of Engineering City of Corpus Christi 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Subject: Creek View Drive Extension City Project E15122 Dear Mr. Edmonds: On March 22, 2017, bids were received and opened on the subject project. There were six (6) bidders as follows: Max Underground Construction LLC Mako Contracting Ram-Bro Contracting, Inc. JHBORES Construction Company, Inc. A. Ortiz Construction and Paving, Inc. J. Carroll Weaver Engineer's Opinion of Cost $308,720.50 $359,418.00 $400,605.50 $448,223.10 $472,157.51 $547,878.84 $314,000.00 The six proposals from the bidders were checked for mathematical errors and none were found. Max Underground Construction LLC was the lowest bidder. The bid tab and submitted experience are attached for your review. The statement of experience supplied by the low bidder appeared to be complete and in order. Based upon all of the above, it is my recommendation that Max Underground Construction LLC be awarded the contract on the subject project. If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (361) 696-3512. Respectfully, Maverick Engineering, Inc. -tngtele_ Michelle Patton, P.E. Infrastructure Group Manager 400 Mann St., Suite 200 Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 361-696-3500 • Fax 361-696-3599 • www.maveng.com CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 .I Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 If there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1. 2. 3, 5, and 6 rf there are no interested parties OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2017-186208 gate Filed: 0.:V31+"201 J Date Acknowledged; 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business, MAX Underground Construction. LLC Corpus Christ, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services. goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E15122 Creek View Driver Extension consists of construction of approx 370 LF, 2 lane asphalt urban roadway with curb & gutter, ADA, draite, and water improvements - - 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business). Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling 1 Intermediary 5 Check only d there is NO Interested Party. h❑' 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury. that the above disclosure is true and correct ..ii.e7.:.":,------- Signature of authorized agent of contracting AFFIX NOTARY STAMP I SEAL ABOVE Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said e 3t __ _. ~ f MARGAREt Not Nolar business enaty - r a of 20 j 1 , to certify which, witness my hand and seat of e- ' .: „o� ROSE RUSSO Pu4tr9, Stare of Texel ft, 3 1099 WWII er administering oath PO ,. + -me of ofbcer administenng oath Titfe of o -r administering oath Forms provided by Taxac f=rhirs rre nmiccinn - -. - ___ CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2017-211660 Date Filed: 05/22/2017 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Barkhurst & Hinojosa, PC San Antonio, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identity the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E15122 Real estate sales contract 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary The William E. McKinzie, Jr. Family Limited Partnership Corpus Christi, TX United States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. ❑ 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. ,,""""",,, PATRICIA M. O°BAYA•TOSCANO F7 /''?!:-0:1 'tom =ti* ?� Notary Public. State Of Texas :. ........ , Comm. Expires 08-23-2017 ,`..fa1�,,i'` Nolory 10 5327103 gin""+'`` �_ AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the said Signatur r - • •rized agent of contracting business entity /y �j ��,/ ALW b . / � LWf s , this the p r day of 20 / 7 , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. / 7 Air—aa 0L �� /yam-/�..1 /} //�} ignature of officer a. nisteriig .ath Printed name of officer administerin oath Title of officer administer if oath Forms Provided by Texas Ethics Commission www Pthirc ctatp tv lig lrarcinn \n in QAC AGENDA MEMORANDUM Future Item for the City Council Meeting of June 13, 2017 Action Item for the City Council Meeting of June 20, 2017 DATE: May 23, 2017 TO: Margie C. Rose, City Manager THRU: Mark Van Vleck, Assistant City Manager markvv@cctexas.com (361) 826-3897 Valerie H. Gray, P. E., Executive Director of Public Works valerieg@cctexas.com (361) 826-3729 FROM: Jeff H. Edmonds, P. E., Director of Engineering Services jeffreye@cctexas.com (361) 826-3851 Construction Contract and Testing Contract Carroll Lane from Houston Street to McArdle Road Bond 2014 Proposition 1 CAPTION: Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Haas - Anderson Construction, Ltd. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $6,192,097.55 for Carroll Lane from Houston Street to McArdle Road for a total Base Bid plus Additive Alternate No. 1 and to execute a construction materials testing agreement with Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $59,515 for Carroll Lane from Houston Street to McArdle Road. (Bond 2014 Proposition 1) PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is to obtain authority to execute a construction contract and a construction materials testing agreement for the Carroll Lane from Houston Street to McArdle Road Street Project. BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS: Bond 2014 Brochure description: "Carroll Lane from Houston Street to McArdle Road — This project includes full -depth reconstruction of the existing C-1 collector two-lane roadway which is consistent with the current designation on the Urban Transportation Plan. Project limits exclude the Gollihar and McArdle intersections. Consideration is being given to eliminate the current on -street parking and add bike lanes, which is consistent with the guidelines of the Mobility CC Plan. Other improvements include curb and gutter, sidewalks; Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) curb ramps, pavement markings." Project Scope: Provides full depth reconstruction of the existing roadway that includes 2 -lanes with on -street parking. The improvements include new HMAC pavement, new concrete bus pads, curb & gutter, sidewalks, ADA ramps, off-street cycle tracks with utility upgrades for water, storm water, gas (by City crews) and wastewater. The off-street cycle tracks are included consistent with the adopted Bicycle Mobility Plan. With two elementary schools in the project vicinity, off-street cycle tracks were the safest solution for bicycle accommodation. The project reduces the width of the roadway which requires the elimination of some on -street parking. The existing condition allows on -street parking on both sides. The design new allows on -street parking on one side only. The proposed parking lane will alternate from one side to the other in order to balance the between residential parking needs and parking requirements for Hicks Elementary. The project was developed with a Base Bid and one Additive Alternative. The Base Bid included all utility improvements except upgrades to the main wastewater system. Additive Alternative No. 1 provides for those wastewater upgrades. The wastewater upgrades were contemplated as a separate project but will be included in this contract to minimize the disruption and expedite the project. This project will be closely coordinated with the intersecting Gollihar Road Reconstruction project. The item also includes the construction material testing agreement to Tolunay-Wong Engineers, who performed the geotechnical investigation during the design phase. This project bid on May 10, 2017, the City received proposals from five (5) bidders and the bids are as follows: Contractor Base Bid Additive Alternate No. 1 (wastewater) Base Bid Plus Add. Alternate No. 1 Hass -Anderson Construction, Ltd. Corpus Christi, Texas 5,976,737.55 215,360.00 6,192,097.55 SJ Louis Construction of Texas, Ltd. San Antonio, Texas 6,062,770.19 180,844.00 6,243,614.19 Berry Contracting, LP dba Bay LTD. Corpus Christi, Texas 6,132,887.95 202,260.00 6,335,147.95 Jimmy Evans Company Austin, Texas 6,547,736.60 185,160.00 6,732,896.60 CPC Interests, LLC dba Clark Pipeline Services, Corpus Christi, Texas 6,871,807.46 172,855.76 7,044,663.22 Engineer Opinion of Probable Cost: 5,902,170.00 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize execution of a construction contract and a construction materials testing agreement. (Recommended) 2. Do not authorize execution of a construction contract and/or a construction materials testing agreement. (Not Recommended) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Martinez, Guy & Maybik, Inc. (MGM) is the design engineer that was selected for this project under RFQ No. 2013-01. CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY: Complies with statutory requirements for construction and professional service contracts. Conforms to FY 2016-2017 Street Capital Improvement Planning (CIP) Budget. EMERGENCY / NON -EMERGENCY: Not applicable DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES: Street Department FINANCIAL IMPACT: ❑ Operating ❑ Revenue X Capital ❑ Not applicable Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Project to Date Budget and Expenditures Current Year Future Years TOTALS Budget $5,500,915.90 2,358,200.00 $7,859,115.90 Encumbered / Expended Amount 644,850.00 644,850.00 This item (Construction) 3,833,897.55 2,358,200.00 6,192,097.55 This item (Testing) 59,515.00 59,515.00 Future Anticipated Expenditures This Project 962,653.35 962,653.35 BALANCE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fund(s): Street and Utility CIP Comments: N/A RECOMMENDATION: City staff and MGM recommend award of a construction contract to Haas -Anderson Construction, Ltd. in the amount of $6,192,097.55 for the total Base Bid plus Additive Alternate No. 1 and a construction materials testing agreement to Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $59,515 for Carroll Lane from Houston Street to McArdle Road. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Project Budget Location Map Presentation Testing Agreement Form 1295 Letter of Recommendation Informal Staff Report 2-2-17 PROJECT BUDGET ESTIMATE Carroll Lane Houston to McArdle BOND 2014 Proposition 1 PROJECT FUNDS AVAILABLE: Street BOND 2014 Proposition 1 $ 3,200,000 Storm Water CIP 2,605,338 Wastewater CIP 845,173 Water CIP 1,166,531 Gas CIP 42,074 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $ 7,859,116 FUNDS REQUIRED: Construction Fees: Construction (Haas -Anderson) THIS ITEM $ 6,192,098 Streets 2,498,853 Utilities 3,693,244 Storm Water 2,079,681 Water 947,915 Wastewater 629,063 Gas 36,586 Contingency (10%) 619,210 Construction Inspection and Testing Fees 245,275 Construction Inspection 185,760 Construction Materials Testing (Tolunay-Wong Engineers) THIS ITEM 59,515 Design Fees 584,810 Engineering Design (MGM) Original through Amendment No. 3 584,810 Streets 294,395 Utilities 290,415 Storm Water 151,958 Water 66,460 Wastewater 71,998 Gas - Reimbursement Fees 217,723 Contract Administration (Eng. Svcs Admin/Finance/Capital Budget) 92,881 Engineering Services (Project Mgt) 123,842 Misc. (Printing, Advertising, etc.) 1,000 TOTAL $ 7,859,116 ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE 0 O. Texas State Aquarium i0 IH -37 Corpus Christi PROJECT LOCATION 64. P* 60 �a S10/s N ,o4, •--9 ..e 44b,c), LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE Project Number: E13097 Carroll Lane Houston St to McArdle Rd Bond 2014 Prop 1 CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Carroll Lane Houston to McArdle BOND 2014, Proposition 1 Corpus Chr sti Engineering Council Presentation June 13, 2017 Project Location �hrsti Engineering CO co CARROLL LANE Project Vicinity Corpus Chr sti Engineering Hicks Elementary School Carroll Lane Cross Section �hrsti Engineering SIDEWALK SIDEWALK CYCLE TRACK PARKING TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE CYCLE TRACK 410 *Parking Lane will alternate on both sides of the road Carroll Lane Cross Sections 111 �hrsti Engineering HOT MIX ASPHALT CONCRETE (HMAC) 5" HMAC 12" LIMESTONE BASE 12" COMPACTED SUBGRADE -PRIME COAT -GEOGRID 5 Project Scope �hrsti Engineering Reconfiguration and reconstruction includes: • HMAC pavement design with concrete bus pads • New off-street cycle tracks that reduces on -street parking to one side only • New Curb & Gutter, sidewalks, ADA ramps, markings and miscellaneous improvements • Utility upgrades for water, wastewater, gas and storm water Project Schedule �hrsti Engineering 2017 2018 Apr I May Jun Bid/ Award Jul I Aug I Sep I Oct I Nov Dec Jan Fe b Mar Apr May I Jun I' Construction Construction Estimate: 365 days AGREEMENT for Construction Materials Testing and Engineering Services This AGREEMENT is between the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation ("CITY"), acting through its duly authorized City Manager or designee ("City Engineer"), and TOLUNAY-WONG ENGINEERS, INC., a Texas corporation or partnership ("LAB"), acting through its duly authorized representative who is Don R. Rokohl, P.E., Branch Manager, which agree as follows: 1. DECLARATIONS: City desires to engage Lab to provide services in connection with City's project, described as follows: Carroll Lane from Houston to McArdle BOND 2014 (Proiect No. E130971 ("PROJECT"). 2. SCOPE OF WORK: Lab shall provide services to the Project in accordance with the accompanying Scope of Services and Fee Schedule attached as Exhibit A and the Terms and Conditions to Agreement attached as Exhibit B. 3. FEE: The City agrees to pay the Lab for services provided in accordance with Exhibit "A", Scope of Services and Fee Schedule under this Agreement, a total fee not to exceed $59,515. Monthly invoices will be submitted in accordance with Exhibit C. 4. CITY'S DISCLOSURE OF HAZARDOUS & TOXIC MATERIALS AND CONDITIONS AT THE PROJECT SITE: To the best of the City's knowledge, based upon currently available information, the only hazardous or toxic materials, as defined by the laws and regulations of the Federal government, the state, and city which exist at the PROJECT SITE are as follows: None. 5. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: All documents including contract. documents (plans and specifications), record drawings, contractor's field data and submittal data will be the sole property of the City and may not be used again by Lab without the express terms written consent of the City Engineer. However, Lab may use standard details that are not specific to this Project. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI TOLUNAY-WONG ENGINEERS, INC. 12— (2-4z-6. 5- 19, A Jeff H. Edmonds, P.E. Date Don R. Rokohl, P. E. Date Director of Engineering Services Branch Manager 826 South Padre Island Drive Corpus Christi, TX 78416 (361) 884-5050 Office drokohl@tweinc.com KIENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE.ANG1EMISTREET1E13097 CARROLL FROM HOUSTON TO MCARDLE BOND ISSUE 20141TCLUNAY WONG515 1215 TESTING AGREEMENT,DOC Rev. 12/15115 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Assistant City Attorney Date ATTEST Rebecca Huerta Date City Secretary Project No. El 3097 Accounting Unit: 3551-051 Account: 550920 Activity: E13097013551 EXP Account Category: 50920 Fund Name: Street CIP BOND 2014 Encumbrance No. K4ENGINEERING DATAEXCHANGE4ANG1EMISTREETLE13097 CARROLL FROM HOUSTON TO MCARDLE BOND ISSUE 20144TOLUNAY WONG115_1215 TESTING AGREEMENT.DOC Rev. 12/15/15 (50 I'o1unay-Wong Engineers, Inc. April 20, 2017 City of Corpus Christi 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 (Via e -Mail: ChrisH3@cctexas.com) Phone: (361) 826-3527 Attn: Mr. Chris Hale Re: Construction Materials Testing Services For: Carroll Lane Corpus Christi, Texas City of Corpus Christi Project No. E13097 TWE Proposal No. P17-0065 Mr. Hale: 826 South Padre Island Drive Corpus Christi, Texas 78416 Phone: (381) 884-5050 Tolunay-Wong Engineers (TWE} appreciates the opportunity to submit our proposal to provide construction materials testing and inspection services for the above referenced project. The proposed scope of services was based on the testing schedule provided in the project plans. We understand that upon acceptance of the proposal, the City of Corpus Christi will issue an Agreement for Construction Materials Engineering Laboratory's Inspection and Materials Testing Services as our authorization for the work. Tolunay-Wong Engineers has established a reputation for excellence in the materials engineering field through a business philosophy based on quality professional services responsive to the needs of our clients. We thank you for the opportunity to serve you with this philosophy and your consideration for this project. Please do not hesitate to contact us, if you have any questions regarding the proposal or if additional information is needed. Respectfully submitted, Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. Luz D. Ramos CMT Project Manager Ira mos{6 tweinc.com �.. re. 1 t Don R. Rokohl, P.E. Branch Manager drokohl@tweinc.com DRR/drr/Idr Geotechnical Engineering *Environmental Field and Consulting Services *Construction Materials Testing •Deep Foundations Testing EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 4 ItTolunay-Wong it' Engineers, Inc. INTRODUCTION April 20, 2017 Proposal No. P17-0065 Page 2of4 TWE understands the importance of this project to the City of Corpus Christi and the special needs associated with construction of a project of this type. Of particular importance is for the overall project team to be comprised of experienced professionals working together toward a common objective. This objective is to obtain a quality project, meeting the intent of the project specifications, as well as completion on schedule and within budget. From our Corpus Christi facility located at 826 South Padre Island Drive, we will provide experienced engineering technicians to perform the on-site testing and inspection services. Additionally, we meet the requirements of ASTM E-329 "Standard Practice for Inspection and Testing Agencies for Concrete, Steel and Bituminous Materials Used in Construction" regarding qualifications of the testing laboratory. Additionally, our Corpus Christi laboratory is accredited in construction materials testing by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA). WORK PLAN TWE's approach to providing materials testing services is to assign qualified engineering technicians, directed by Senior Professional Engineers, experienced in their respective disciplines. Our assigned Project Manager will provide communication, service direction, and overall project coordination. It is presumed that the contractor will be encouraged to provide their own formalized quality control program separate and apart from our acceptance inspection/testing program stated herein. We anticipate providing the majority of the required testing services for this particular project on a "part- time" basis. The anticipated services required on this project are as follows: A. In -Place Soil Compaction (nuclear method) B. Cast In -Place Portland Cement Concrete Inspection/Testing C. Hot Mix Asphalt Concrete Inspection/Testing All reports of materials tests and inspection services provided will be issued to appropriate members of the project team. In the event individual reports indicate potential problems or items of non-conformance to the project specifications, you will be contacted as soon as possible. SCOPE OF SERVICES The specific materials monitoring services and laboratory tests anticipated for this project are as follows: A. In -Place Soil Compaction (Nuclear Method) • The technician will obtain samples of soil, borrow material and/or base materials and deliver them to our laboratory facility for testing. Laboratory testing will include Moisture/Density Relationships, Atterberg Limit determinations and sieve analysis. • The technician will perform in-place compaction testing (nuclear method) at the frequency required by the project specifications to determine the moisture content and degree of compaction. Geotechnical Engineering •Environmental Field and Consulting Services *Construction Materials Testing *Deep Foundations Testing EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 4 II0 I oIunav-\Yong Engineers, lnc. B. Cast In -Place Portland Cement Concrete Monitoring/Testing April 20, 2017 Proposal No. P17-0065 Page 3 of 4 The technician will sample the concrete in order to perform standard field tests and prepare test cylinders and/or beams in accordance with project specifications. The frequency of sampling will also be as directed by the project specifications. Standard field tests include slump, air content and temperature for normal weight concrete and will also include unit weight on all samples of lightweight concrete. TWE will cure the test specimens and perform compressive strength tests at the age designated by project specifications. The technician will visually estimate the slump of each load of concrete delivered and perform actual slump tests and other standard field tests when test specimens are prepared, or as necessary to evaluate concrete consistency. The on-site technician will monitor the concrete temperature, ambient temperature, mixing time, and placement procedures. The technician will also sample concrete at the frequency specified in the project specifications. The technician will record detailed information regarding the location of the placement, date of the placement, concrete mixture strength requirement and all other pertinent information. C. Hot Mix Asphalt Concrete Inspection/Testing During lay down of hot mix asphalt concrete, the technician will obtain and record temperature of the mixture and obtain samples for laboratory testing. After lay down and compaction, the asphalt will be cored to determine and record in-place thickness, % air voids, and laboratory density. The in-place % air voids and in-place theoretical density will be determined from the asphalt cores in the laboratory. The asphalt samples obtained during lay down will tested in the laboratory for extraction and gradation, laboratory density and stability, and maximum theoretical density (rice method). COST ESTIMATE & GENERAL NOTES In this section of the proposal you will find our cost estimate. Additional services or tests requested and not specifically addressed in this proposal will be invoiced per the standard fees set forth in our 2017 Fee Schedule. Based on the testing schedule provided in the project construction documents (plans) provided to us at this time and the anticipated construction schedule, we have established what we believe is the most realistic cost estimate for this project. Please remember that the units stated are only an estimate. Due to factors beyond our control such as weather, unforeseen conditions, contractor expertise, contractor scheduling, etc., the cost of our services may vary from the estimated amount. We estimate the cost of the construction materials testing for our proposed Scope of Services will be $59,515.00 as detailed in the following section, although all services will be invoiced on a time and materials basis. A minimum 4 -hour labor equivalent charge is applicable for all field testing and inspection services. Overtime rates for field personnel are applicable for all hours worked in excess of 8 hours per day, weekends, and holidays and are assessed at 1.5 times the standard rates. All field hours will be charged portal to portal from our Corpus Christi laboratory. All sample pick-ups will be charged travel time from Geotechnicol Engineering •Environmental Field and Consulting Services •Construction Materials Testing •Deep Foundations Testing EXHIBIT "A" Page 3 of 4 1110 olunay-\Yong Engineers, Inc. April 20, 2017 Proposal No. P17-0065 Page 4af4 portal to portal and will include associated vehicle charges. Administrative costs, Engineering consultation and evaluation in connection with field and laboratory testing services will be charged at a rate of approximately one hour for each 20 hours of field work performed. Our prices include copies of our reports distributed through e-mail in accordance with your instructions. Additional copies mailed at $0.50 per page. Direct expenses incurred in connection with the project will be invoiced at cost plus 15% for handling. Travel and lodging expenses for out of town assignments will be invoiced at cost plus 15% or 5125.00 per day, whichever is greater. Our terms are net 30 days upon receipt of invoice. Invoices will be submitted on a monthly basis. COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY Description I Unit I Quantity Rate I Extension Construction Materials Testing - Soils 1 Standard Compaction Effort - ASTM D 698 - Trench Backfill ea. 1 $160.00 5160.00 2 Standard Compaction Effort - ASTM D 698 - Subgrade ea. 2 $160.00 $320.00 3 Nuclear Density Gauge, Day ea. 50 $50.00 52,500.00 4 Soil Sample Pick-up ea. 2 5175.00 5350.00 5 Construction Materials Technician, HR. ea. 300 550.00 515,000.00 6 Vehicle Charge ea. 50 $75.00 $3,750.00 Construction Materials Testing - Flexible Base 7 Modified Compaction Effort - ASTM 0 1557 (Proctor) ea. 4 $180.00 5720.00 8 Sieve Analysis, Through No. 200 Sieve (ASTM D 422) ea. 4 560.00 5240.00 9 Atterberg Limits - ASTM D 4318 ea. 4 $65.00 $260.00 10 LA Abrasion Loss of Limestone Base ea. 4 5550.00 52,200.00 11 California Bearing Ratio - Single Point (ASTM 0 1883) ea. 1 5350.00 $350.00 12 Wet Ball Mill Test ea. 1 $200.00 $200.00 13 TxDOT Triaxial Series per specimen (Tex -117E) ea. 1 $220.00 5220.00 14 Soil Sample Pick-up ea. 2 5175.00 5350.00 15 Construction Materials Technician, HR. ea. 150 550.00 $7,500.00 16 Vehicle Charge ea. 25 $75,00 51,875.00 Construction Materials Testing - Hot Mix Asphalt 17 Extraction/Gradation -Ignition Method (Tex -236F) ea. 16 5250.00 54,000.00 18 Hveem Stability {three specimens/set} (Tex -208F) ea. 16 $85.00 $1,360.00 19 Maximum Theoretical Specific Gravity (Tex -227F) ea. 16 585.00 $1,360.00 20 Asphalt Coring ea. 5 5125.00 5625.00 21 Core Length ea. 5 $20.00 $100.00 22 Core Bulk Density (ASTM D 2726) ea. 5 $55.00 5275.00 23 Construction Materials Technician, HR. ea. 80 550.00 $4,000.00 24 Vehicle Charge ea. 10 575.00 5750.00 Construction Materials Testing - Concrete 25 Comp. Strength of Concrete Test Cylinders (7, 28 & Hold) ea. 70 520.00 $1,400.00 26 Concrete Sample Pick Up, Per Trip ea. 5 5175.00 5875.00 27 Construction Materials Technician, HR. ea. 60 $50.00 $3,000.00 28 Vehicle Charge ea. 15 $75.00 $1,125.00 Project Management 29 Project Manager, Hr. ea. 30 $105,00 $3,150.00 30 Administrative Support, Hr, ea. 30 $50.00 $1,500.00 Total Cost Estimate $59,515.00 ASSUMPTIONS: The cost estimate is based on the following assumptions and our experience on similar projects: 1. The testing schedule provided in project construction documents. Geotechnical Engineering *Environmental Field and Consulting Services *Construction Materials Testing *Deep Foundations Testing EXHIBIT "A" Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT B TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO TESTING AGREEMENT ARTICLE 1. SERVICES: Lab will: 1.1 Provide only those services requested by City Engineer that, in the opinion of Lab, lie within the technical or professional areas of expertise of Lab and which Lab is adequately staffed and equipped to perform. 1.2 Perform technical services under the supervision of a licensed professional engineer and in compliance with the basic requirements of the appropriate standards of the American Society for Testing and Materials, where applicable, and other standards designated in writing by the City Engineer. 1.3 Promptly submit formal reports (printed and electronic copies) of tests, inspections and services performed indicating, where applicable, compliance with the Project specifications or other contract documents. Such reports must be complete and factual, citing the tests performed, methods employed, values obtained and parts of the structure of the Project area subjected to any testing. 1.4 Utilize testing equipment which has been calibrated according to applicable standards and, upon request, submit to the City Engineer or designee documentation of such calibration. Secure representative samples of those materials that the City's contractor proposes to use which require testing, together with relevant data concerning such materials including the point of origin and supplier. 1.5 Consider reports to be confidential and distribute reports only to those persons, organizations or agencies specifically designated in writing by the City Engineer. 1.6 Retain records relating to services performed for City for a period of two years following submission of any reports, during which period the records will be made available to the City at all reasonable times. 1.7 Pay salaries, wages, expenses, social security taxes, federal and state unemployment taxes and any other similar payroll taxes relating to the services. ARTICLE 2. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES: City Engineer or designee will: 2.1 Provide Lab with all plans, specifications, addenda, change orders, approved shop drawings and other information for the proper performance of services by Lab. 2.2 Issue authorization in writing giving Lab free access to the Project site and to all shops or yards where materials are prepared or stored. 2.3 Designate in writing those persons or firms which will act as the City's representative with respect to Lab's services to be performed under this Agreement and which must be promptly notified by Lab when it appears that materials tested or inspected are in non-compliance. Only the City Engineer or designee has authority to transmit instructions, receive information and data and/or interpret and define the City's policies and decisions with respect to the Project. Lab acknowledges that certain City representatives may have different types of authority concerning the Project. 2.4 Advise Lab sufficiently in advance of any operations so as to allow for assignment of personnel by Lab for completion of the required services. Such advance notice will be in accordance with that established by mutual agreement of the parties. EXHIBIT "B" Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT B 2.5 Direct the Project contractor, either by the Construction Contract or direct written order, to: (a) Stop work at the appropriate times for Lab to perform contracted services; (b) Furnish such labor and all facilities needed by Lab to obtain and handle samples at the Project and to facilitate the specified inspection and tests; (c) Provide and maintain for use of Lab adequate space at the Project for safe storage and proper curing of test specimens that must remain on the Project site prior to, during and up to 60 days after testing. ARTICLE 3. GENERAL CONDITIONS 3.1 Lab, by the performance of services covered hereunder, does not in any way assume, abridge or abrogate any of those duties, responsibilities or authorities with regard to the Project that, by custom or contract, are vested in the Project architects, design engineers or any other design agencies or authorities. 3.2 Lab is not authorized to supervise, alter, relax, enlarge or release any requirement of the Project specifications or other contract documents nor to approve or accept any portion of the work. Lab does not have the right of rejection or the right to stop the work. City Engineer will direct the Project contractor to stop work at appropriate times for Lab to conduct the sampling, testing or inspection of operations covered by the Agreement. ARTICLE 4. FIELD MONITORING AND TESTING 4.1 City and Lab agree that Lab will be on-site to perform inspections for contracted services. The City and Lab also agree that Lab will not assume responsibility for Project contractor's means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction, and it is understood that the final services provided by Lab will not relieve the Project contractor of its responsibilities for performing the work in accordance with the Project plans and specifications. For the purposes of this Agreement, the word "inspection" is used to mean periodic observation of the work and the conducting of tests by Lab as specified in the Agreement. Continuous monitoring by Lab or its subcontractors does not mean that Lab is approving placement of materials. Inspection is not and should not be construed to be a warranty by Lab to the City or any other party. 4.2 Samples collected or tested by Lab remain the property of the City while in the custody of the Lab. Lab will retain the samples for a period of 60 days following the date of submission of any report related to the sample. Following the retention period, Lab will dispose of non -hazardous samples, and return hazardous, acutely toxic or radioactive samples and samples' containers and residues to City. City agrees to accept such samples and samples' containers. ARTICLE 5. STANDARD OF CARE AND WARRANTY Services performed by Lab will be conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the same locality. No other warranty either expressed or implied is made or intended by the Agreement or any reports. Lab will not be responsible for the interpretation or use by others of data developed by Lab. ARTICLE 6. INDEMNIFICATION Lab shall fully indemnify and hold harmless the City of Corpus Christi and its officials, officers, agents, employees, or other entity, excluding the engineer or architect or that person's agent, employee or subconsultant, over which the City EXHIBIT "B" Page 2 of 6 EXHIBIT B exercises control ("Indemnitee") from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, to the extent that the damage is caused by or results from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property infringement or failure to pay a subcontractor or supplier committed by Lab or its agent, Lab under contract or another entity over which Lab exercises control while in the exercise of rights or performance of the duties under this agreement. This indemnification does not apply to any liability resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the City or its employees, to the extent of such negligence. Lab shall defend Indemnitee, with counsel satisfactory to the City Attorney, from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, if the claim is not based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee. If a claim is based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of or breach of contract by Indemnitee, the Lab shall reimburse the City's reasonable attorney's fees in proportion to the Lab's liability. Lab must advise City in writing within 24 hours of any claim or demand against City or Lab known to Lab related to or arising out of Lab's activities under this Agreement. ARTICLE 7. INVOICES AND PAYMENT 7.1 Lab will submit progress invoices to City Engineer monthly and final invoice upon completion of services. Each invoice is due and payable by City within 30 days of receipt and approval to pay by the City Engineer. 7.2 Ail funding obligations of the City under this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of funds in its annual budget. ARTICLE 8. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 8.1 Consultant must not commence work under this agreement until all required insurance has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City. Consultant must not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all similar insurance required of any subcontractor has been obtained. 8.2 Consultant must furnish to the Director of Engineering Services with the signed agreement a copy of Certificates of Insurance (COI) with applicable policy endorsements showing the following minimum coverage by an insurance company(s) acceptable to the City's Risk Manager. The City must be listed as an additional insured on the General liability and Auto Liability policies, and a waiver of subrogation is required on all applicable policies. Endorsements must be provided with COI. Project name and or number must be listed in Description Box of COI. EXHIBIT "B" Page 3 of 6 EXHIBIT B TYPE OF INSURANCE MINIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE 30 -written day notice of cancellation, required on all certificates or by applicable policy endorsements Bodily Injury and Property Damage Per occurrence - aggregate Commercial General Liability including: 1. Commercial Broad Form 2. Premises — Operations 3. Products/ Completed Operations 4. Contractual Liability 5. Independent Contractors 6. Personal Injury -Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate AUTO LIABILITY (including) 1. Owned 2. Hired and Non -Owned 3. Rented/Leased $500,000 Combined Single Limit PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY (Errors and Omissions) $1,000,000 Per Claim If claims made policy, retro date must be prior to inception of agreement, have extended reporting period provisions and identify any limitations regarding who is insured. 8.3 In the event of accidents of any kind related to this agreement, Consultant must furnish the City with copies of all reports of any accidents within 10 days of the accident. 8.4 Consultant shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Contract, and any extension hereof, at Consultant's sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence basis, by companies authorized and admitted to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no Tess than A- VII. Consultant is required to provide City with renewal Certificates. 8.5 Consultant shall be required to submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to City at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change. Consultant shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. All notices under this Article shall be given to City at the following address: City of Corpus Christi Attn: Engineering Services P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi, TX 78469-9277 8.6 Consultant agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: EXHIBIT "8" Page 4 of 6 EXHIBIT B 8.6.1 List the City and its officers, officials, employees and elected representatives as additional insured by endorsement, as respects operations, completed operation and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured performed under contract with the City with the exception of the professional liability/Errors & Omissions policy; 8.6.2 Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the City of Corpus Christi where the City is an additional insured shown on the policy; 8.6.3 Provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice directly to City of any suspension, cancellation or non -renewal of coverage, and not less than ten (10) calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. 8.7 Within five (5) calendar days of a suspension, cancellation or non -renewal of coverage, Consultant shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to City. City shall have the option to suspend Consultant's performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this contract. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 8.8 In addition to any other remedies the City may have upon Consultant's failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City shall have the right to order Consultant to remove the exhibit hereunder, and/or withhold any payment(s) if any, which become due to Consultant hereunder until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. 8.9 Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Consultant's or its subcontractor's performance of the work covered under this agreement. 8.10 It is agreed that Consultant's insurance shall be deemed primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance or self-insurance carried by the City of Corpus Christi for liability arising out of operations under this agreement. 8.11 It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this agreement. ARTICLE 9. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT The City may, at any time, with or without cause, terminate this Agreement upon seven days written notice to Lab at the address of record. Lab will be compensated for services performed up to termination. ARTICLE 10. CONTROLLING LAW This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Texas without regard to its conflicts of laws. Venue for legal proceedings lie exclusively in Nueces County, Texas. ARTICLE 11. DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS 11.1 Lab agrees to comply with City of Corpus Christi Ordinance No. 17112 and complete the Disclosure of Interests form as part of this Agreement, if required. EXHIBIT "B" Page 5 of 6 EXHIBIT B 11.2 Lab agrees to comply with section 2252.908 of the Texas Government Code and complete Form 1295 Certificate of Interested Parties as part of this Agreement, if required. For more information, please review the information on the Texas Ethics Commission website at https://m/w.ethics.state.tx.us. 11.3 Lab agrees to comply with Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Government Code and file Form CIO with the City of Corpus Christi City Secretary's Office, if required. For more information and to determine if you need to file a Form CIO, please review the information on the City Secretary's website at http:Ifwww.cctexas.com/government/city-secretary/conflict-disclosure/index. ARTICLE 12. CLAIMS 12.1 Claims arising from this Agreement shall be made in writing, sworn to and signed by an authorized representative. The responsibility to substantiate a claim rests with the party making the claim. 12.2 All negotiations pursuant to this Article are confidential and shall be treated as compromise and settlement negotiations for purposes of applicable rules of evidence. ARTICLE 13. EXTENT OF AGREEMENT 13.1 This Agreement, including Exhibit "A" and these Terms and Conditions, represents the entire Agreement between City and Lab and supersedes all prior negotiation, representations or agreements, written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument signed by duly authorized representatives of City and Lab. If any conflict occurs between these Terms and Conditions and any other part of this Agreement, these Terms and Conditions are controlling. 13.2 In the event that any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, the remaining terms will be in full effect and this Agreement will be construed as if the invalid or unenforceable matters were never included in this Agreement. No waiver of any default will be a waiver of any future default, 13.3 Neither party will assign this Agreement without the express written approval of the other, but Lab may subcontract laboratory procedures as Lab deems necessary to meet the obligations of this Agreement. ARTICLE 14. SAFETY City and Lab agree that, in accordance with the generally accepted construction practice, the Project's general contractor will be solely and completely responsible for working conditions on the Project, including safety of all persons and property during the performance of the work and for compliance with all municipal, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, including OSHA. The duty of Lab in providing services is not, therefore, to include any review of, or responsibility for, the adequacy of the Project's general contractors safety measures in, on or near the Project site. EXHIBIT "B" Page 6 of 6 Basic Services: Preliminary Phase Design Phase Bid Phase Construction Phase Subtotal Basic Services Additional Services: Permitting Warranty Phase Inspection Platting Survey 0 & M Manuals SCADA Subtotal Additional Services Summary of Fees: Basic Services Fees Additional Services Fees Total of Fees COMPLETE PROJECT NAME Project No. XXXX Invoice No. 12345 Invoice Date 01/0112017 Sample form for: Payment Request AE Contract Revised 02101/17 Total Current Previous Total Remaining Percent Contract Amd No. 1 Amd No. 2 Contract 51,000.00 50.00 50.00 $1,000.00 52,000.00 51,000.00 50.00 $3,000.00 5500.00 $0.00 $250.00 5750.00 52,500.00 50.00 $1,000.00 53,500.00 $6,000.00 51,000.00 $1,250.00 58,250.00 50.00 52,000.00 50.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 50.00 51,120.00 50.00 $1,120.00 50.00 $0.00 $1,627.00 $1,627.00 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 52,000.00 $1,120.00 51,627.00 $4,747.00 56,000.00 $1,000.00 51,250.00 58,250.00 $2,000.00 51,120.00 51,627.00 $4,747.00 $8,000.00 $2,120.00 52,877.00 512,997.00 Invoice Invoice Invoice 50.00 51,000.00 51,000.00 51,000.00 5500.00 $1,500.00 50.00 50.00 $0.00 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 51,000.00 51,500.00 $2,500.00 0.0% 5500.00 50.00 5500.00 $0.00 50.00 $0.00 50.00 50.00 $0.00 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 5500.00 50.00 $500.00 51,000.00 $1,500.00 $2,500.00 $500.00 50.00 5500.00 51,500.00 $1,500.00 53,000.00 Balance Complete 50.00 100.0% $1,500.00 50.0% $750.00 0.0% $3,500,00 0.0% 55,750.00 30.3% $1,500.00 25.0% $1,120.00 0.0% 51,627.00 0.0% TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD $4,247.00 10.5% $5,750.00 30.3% 54,247.00 10.5% 59,997.00 23.1% Notes: If needed, update this sample form based on the contract requirements. If applicable, refer to the contract for information on what to include with time and materials (T&MJ. City of Chris Corps City of Corpus Christi Ordinance 17112 as amended, requires all persons or firms seeking to do business with the City to provide the following information. Every question must be answered. If the question is not applicable, answer with "NA". See reverse side for Filing Requirements, Certifications and definitions. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST COMPANY NAME: Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. P. O. BOX: STREET ADDRESS: 826 South Padre Island Drive CITY: Corpus Christi ZIP: 78416 FIRM IS: 1. Corporation 4. Association 2. Partnership 5. Other e 3. Sole Owner 0 DISCLOSURE QUESTIONS If additional space is necessary, please use the reverse side of this page or attach separate sheet. 1. State the names of each `employee" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm?' Name Department (if known) Job Title and City 2. State the names of each "official" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name tig Title 3. State the names of each "board member" of the City of Corpus Christi having an "ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name i l Committee Board, Commission or 4. State the names of each employee or officer of a "consultant" for the City of Corpus Christi who worked on any matter related to the subject of this contract and has an ownership interest" constituting 3% or more of the ownership in the above named "firm." Name i /A Consultant FILING REQUIREMENTS If a person who requests official action on a matter knows that the requested action will confer an economic benefit on any City official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect that the action will have on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof, you shall disclose that fact in a signed writing to the City official, employee or body that has been requested to act in the matter, unless the interest of the City official or employee in the matter is apparent. The disclosure shall also be made in a signed writing filed with the City Secretary. [Ethics Ordinance Section 2-349 (d)] CERTIFICATION 1 certify that all information provided is true and correct as of the date of this statement, that I have not knowingly withheld disclosure of any information requested; and that supplemental statements will be promptly submitted to the City of Corpus Christi, Texas as changes occur. Certifying Person: Don R. Rokohl, P.E. Title: (Type or Print) Signature of Certifying D. 12- fz ut- Person: Branch Manager DEFINITIONS Date: j y e 1 7 a. "Board member." A member of any board, commission, or committee appointed by the City Council of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. b. "Economic benefit". An action that is likely to affect an economic interest if it is likely to have an effect on that interest that is distinguishable from its effect on members of the public in general or a substantial segment thereof. c. "Employee." Any person employed by the City of Corpus Christi, Texas either on a full or part-time basis, but not as an independent contractor. d. "Firm." Any entity operated for economic gain, whether professional, industrial or commercial, and whether established to produce or deal with a product or service, including but not limited to, entities operated in the form of sole proprietorship, as self-employed person, partnership, corporation, joint stock company, joint venture, receivership or trust, and entities which for purposes of taxation are treated as non-profit organizations. e. "Official." The Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Department and Division Heads, and Municipal Court Judges of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. f. "Ownership Interest." Legal or equitable interest, whether actually or constructively held, in a firm, including when such interest is held through an agent, trust, estate, or holding entity. "Constructively held" refers to holdings or control established through voting trusts, proxies, or special terms of venture or partnership agreements." g. "Consultant." Any person or firm, such as engineers and architects, hired by the City of Corpus Christi for the purpose of professional consultation and recommendation. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2017-210552 Date Filed: 05/19/2017 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Haas-Anderson Construction, Ltd. Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Christi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. Project # E13097 Carroll Lane from McArdle to Houston (Bond 2014) 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary Haas, Darryl Corpus Christi, TX United States X Anderson, Jim Corpus Christi, TX United States X Lamon, Tim Corpus Christi, TX United States X Parish, Jim Corpus Christi, TX United States X Cullen, Drew Corpus Christi, TX United States X Moore, Randall Corpus Christi, TX United States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. ❑ 6 AFFIDAVIT I swear, or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the above disclosure is true and correct. ak"" /�9 d� �� ,. i401/114/ p \ LEE ANN CAVETT SMITH NOTARY PUBLIC corrnsao-201 ' 12-18-2017' Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity Q In /v said ire. t L t., I Q A this the ( day of j - /fie L\ , AFFIX NOTARY STAMP / SEAL ABOVE Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the 20 7 , to certify which, witness my hand and seal of office. 2--ee n n -- t i"h ai-Pr- - (\"." -.SPS Signature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administeru oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.883 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 1 of 1 Complete Nos. 1- 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY CERTIFICATION OF FILING Certificate Number: 2017-203347 Date Filed: 05/05/2017 Date Acknowledged: 1 Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. Tolunay-Wong Engineers Corpus Christi, TX United States 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. City of Corpus Chrisi 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. E13097 C Orel I Levile Construction materials testing. 4 Name of Interested Party City, State, Country (place of business) Nature of interest (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. Corpus Christi, TX United States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. ❑ 6 AFFIDAVIT /j 1111111U11i1N1Jr�ii ,,,OyS.OEAR o •y e��`�„4 C/(;'' `�.•• _ (v S. f J y e `' • AFFIX NOTASZ`AAGJ,�P}VE 40, l 11 1111e1�m�` subscribe Sworn to and subscribe before me, by the said 20 1- , to certify which, witness my hand swear, or affirm, under that the above disclosure is true and correct. Penal tY of perjury, I) if J �I 4-g Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity /M 12 • f2O , this the day of U 1 L `J , and seal of office. 0-17 ACl (AN' Y y1 w10 �'Y iff L/bill iature of officer administering oath Printed name of officer administering oath Title of officer administering oath Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www,ethics,state.tx.us Version V1,0.883 May 17, 2017 Ricardo Martinez, P.E. Project Manager- MGM, Inc. 6000 South Staples St, Suite 207 Corpus Christi, Texas 78413 Chris Hale, P.E. City of Corpus Christi- Project Manager 1201 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, Texas 78469 MARTINEZ, GUY & MAYBIK, INC. FNGINFFfZS x- SIIRVFYQRS 6000 S, staples suite 207 Corpus Christi, Texas 78413 361-814 -3070 Fax 1-888653-5510 Cos Christi • Hous( -n Eagfo Pos Pc1 Pic A,oa RE: Carroll Lane From McArdle to Houston (Bond 2014), Project No. E13097 Letter of Recommendation of Award of Contract Dear Mr. Hale, Bids for the subject project were publicly opened on May 10, 2017. A total of five (5) bids were received for the project. The apparent low bidder on the project is Haas -Anderson Construction, Ltd. with a total base bid of $5,976,737.55. One Additive/Alternate was included in the bid, and Haas -Anderson remains the low bidder with a total project bid (base bid plus the additive/alternate of $215,360.00) of $6,192,097.55. Our office has reviewed Haas -Anderson's Statement of Experience (SOE) submitted subsequent to the bid date (see attachment). Haas -Anderson has key personnel listed for the project (Project Manager, Superintendents, etc.) that appear to satisfy all the minimum experience requirements listed in the contract documents. Based on interviews from the references, Haas -Anderson received satisfactory reviews from its performance on similarly sized projects. Therefore, MGM recommends award of this project to Haas -Anderson in the amounts bid for the Base Bid total of $5,976,737.55 in combination with the Additive/Alternative ($215,360.00), based on available funding. cerely, (_,S4-1 Iti Ricardo Martjnez, P.E. RM/VM INFORMAL STAFF REPORT MEMORANDUM To: Margie C. Rose, City Manager Thru: Mark Van Vleck, P.E., Assistant City ManagerOa Valerie H. Gray, P.E., Executive Director Public Works From: Jeff Edmonds, P.E., Director of Engineering Services Date: February 2, 2017 Subject: CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST (CCAR) — January 31, 2017 BIDDING STREET BOND PROJECTS WITH BOTH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (PCC) AND HOT -MIX -ASPHALT -CONCRETE (HMAC) ISSUE: During the January 31, 2017 City Council meeting, Mayor Pro Tempore Vaughn requested Staff to provide an informal report explaining past council directives relative to the selection of PCC or HMAC for street reconstruction projects. BACKGROUND & FINDINGS: BOND 2012 PROJECTS: In late 2014, there was recognition that the majority of the Bond 2012 projects were under budgeted. Various strategies were considered to address the funding shortfall. A council resolution (see ATTACHMENT 1) was approved on February 17, 2015 that provided specific guidance on project deferrals, bicycle accommodation and pavement design. The pavement design guidance indicated that certain Bond 2012 projects were to be bid HMAC, others PCC and most were to be bid both HMAC and PCC. BOND 2014 PROJECTS: In April 2013 Council approved a Bond 2014 Execution Strategy that involved funding and initiating the project design efforts in advance of the Bond referendum. In July 2013, Council approved a Reimbursement Resolution to fund design efforts and directed staff to begin procuring design services for the streets listed on Proposition One of the Council -approved project list. Those design contracts were approved by City Council in early 2014. Consultants were directed to take the design effort to an Engineering Letter Report (ELR) level (see ATTACHMENT 2) in order to provide a better budget basis for the Bond referendum. Included in the scope of work for the Bond 2014 ELR's was a pavement lifecycle cost analysis and recommendation. Determining the required pavement section is primarily based the Association of State Highway Transportation ©fcials (AASHTO) Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. The inputs include anticipated vehicle loads, the structural properties of the subbase soil, the desired reliability level and the desired service life. For the lifecycle cost analysis, equivalent pavement sections are developed for both HMAC and PCC using a 30 -year service life. The lifecycle analysis is conducted for a minimum of 30 years considering the cost for initial construction, anticpated maintenance and major repairs at the end of the design life. In some cases, there are other factors that may drive a recommendation for HMAC or PCC such as underground utilities, driveway access requirements and compatibility with existing adjacent pavement. After the Bond 2014 referendum passed in November 2014, the design engineers were released to complete the designs for the Proposition One projects. The original guidance in late 2014 was to base the roadway design on the ELR pavement recommendation for each of the projects. That guidance has not been modified. Amendments have been negotiated on many of the Bond 2014 projects. Those amemdments; however, only addressed the Bicycle Mobility Plan recommendations and Value Engineering on drainage systems. Staff is unaware of any formal council direction to negotiate contract amendments to redesign Bond 2014 projects for both PCC and HMAC pavement structures. RESIDENTIAL RECONSTRUCTION: On December 13, 2016 Council passed a Motion of Direction (see ATTACHMENT 3) that the residential reconstruction pilot projects should be designed as both HMAC and PCC pavement structures. That direction was clarified during the December 20, 2016 meeting to indicate that both designs were to be applied for full reconstruction projects and not situations where the existing pavement can be rehabilitated (see ATTACHMENT 4). SEPTEMBER 22, 2015 COUNCIL MEETING: During the January 13th 2017 City Council Retreat, the question was raised about a discussion that took place during the September 22, 2015 City Council meeting. There was a discussion of pavement design during the item awarding the construction contract for the Bond 2012 Proposition 1 Project - Williams Drive Phase 3 (see ATTACHMENT 5). During the discussion, a question was asked whether projects would continue to be bid both ways. There was perhaps a misunderstanding regarding the staff response to this question. Some council members may have considered this as a motion of direction to design all future projects with both HMAC and PCC pavement. The staff response was intended to mean that many of the future projects on both the 2012 and 2014 Bond Programs were being designed to bid both ways. Staff did not consider this discussion as formal direction to pursue design amendments for all Bond 2014 projects that were not scoped at that time to bid with both HMAC and PCC pavement. NEXT STEPS: Staff will continue with the designs of the Bond 2012 projects in accordance with the February 2015 resolution. Additionally, staff has reviewed the Bond 2014 ELR recommendations and determined which projects could be designed with both PCC and HMAC without significantly impacting the schedule. Staff is proposing to include three projects (current ELR's recommended HMAC) that will be re - scoped and designed to include a PCC and HMAC pavement structure. This will involve negotiation of staff -approvable contract amendments. The attached table (see ATTACHMENT 6) shows the currently proposed and recommended pavement structure for the Bond 2014 projects. FEBRUARY 17, 2015 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution directing staff to proceed with bidding remaining Bond 2012 Protects; and providing direction on specific projects. WHEREAS, at the regular council meetings of January 27, 2015 and February 17, 2015, staff presented the City Council with information related to the Bond 2012 program; WHEREAS, Council has considered general items applicable to all projects as well as items that apply to individual projects; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS: SECTION 1. To the extent that the funds authorized under the Bond 2012 Proposition 1 are insufficient to cover total project costs, the City will issue Certificates of Obligation (COs) to provide additional funding. SECTION 2. The following Bond 2012 projects are directly affected by the new Harbor Bridge construction and will be deferred and reassessed at a later date: the Twigg Street Project, from Shoreline Boulevard to Lower Broadway Street; and the Leopard Street Project, from Crosstown Expressway to Palm Drive. SECTION 3. The following streets recommended to be constructed with Hot Mix Asphalt Concrete (HMAC) will be bid for both HMAC and Concrete unless underlying structural conditions warrant otherwise: South Alameda Street, from Ayers Street to Louisiana Avenue; South Staples Street, from Brawner Parkway to Kostoryz Road; Staples Street from 1-37 to Morgan Avenue; Kostoryz Road Project, from Brawner Parkway to Staples Street, and Williams Drive, from South Staples Street to Airline Road. SECTION 4. The following projects are to be designed and constructed without designated bike lanes: Kostoryz Road Project, from Brawner Parkway to Staples Street; Greenwood Drive Project, from Gollihar Road to Home Road, and Tuloso Road Project (wide shoulders only), from 111-37 to Leopard Street. SECTION 5. In connection with the following project, staff will plan a future hike and bike trail project along Airport Ditch through H.P. Garcia Park with access to Greenwood at Home Road and Gollihar Road: the Greenwood Drive Project, from Gollihar Road fa Home Road. SECTION 6. The following project is to be designed and constructed to improve pedestrian/ADA crossings at both Kostoryz Road and Texan Trail to replace the 030482 Page 1 o13 INDEXED existing crosswalk to Ray High School: the South Staples Street Project, from Brawner Parkway to Kostoryz Road. SECTION 7. Exhibit "A" (attached and incorporated herein), describes more fully the design and construction directives for certain projects. SECTION 8. Staff Is directed to proceed with the Bond 2012 Program. ATTEST: P.Ick,ex. Rebecca Huerta City Secretary H C OF CORPUS CHRISTI Nelda Martinez Mayor Page 2 of 3 EXHIBIT A BOND 2012 Streets: 1 Discussion and Notes: • • Twigg Leopard Remain on Deferral. • Morgan (Staples to Crosstown) • • Include in active project list (additional funding may be required). Continue coordination with Hospital including monthly meetings are held with hospital and development. • • • Alameda Staples (1-37 to Morgan) Williams • Bid with both Concrete and HMAC. • Kostoryz • Bid with both Concrete and HMAC; • No Bike Lane; • Evaluate bicycle connectivity to Del Mar and nearby schools during final design. • Staples (Kostoryz to Brawner Pkwy) • • Bid with both Concrete and HMAC Existing crosswalk to Ray High School removed with improved pedestrian/ADA crossings at both Kostoryz and Texan Trail. This was coordinated with Ray HS, Police, Traffic Engineer, and RTA to improve safety for parents, children and general public. • Tuloso • Constructed as concrete with wide shoulders to accommodate bikes. • Ocean Drive • Constructed as HMAC; HMAC recommended to avoid potential joint failures (separation, raised & depressed panels, cracking, etc.) assodated with poor subgrade materials (dredged fill). • Greenwood • No Bike Lane; plan future project for hike & bike along Airport Ditch through H.P. Garcia Park with access to Greenwood at Horne and Gallihar. • Holly • Proposed median approximately 70% Xeriscape plantings and 30% grass is under review for additional Hardscape, project is a 80/20 shared cost with TxDOT (80%). Page 3 of 3 Corpus Christi, Texas U' of , The above resolution was passed by the following vote: Nelda Martinez Rudy Garza Chad Magill Colleen McIntyre Lillian Riojas Brian Rosas Lucy Rubio Mark Scott Carolyn Vaughn Aky SEPTEMBER 12, 2014 SAMPLE ENGINEERING LETTER REPORT (ELR) EXCERPT ATTACHMENT 2 FINAL ENGINEERING LETTER REPORT GOLLIHAR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS Kostoryz Road to Weber Road (Bond 2014) CITY PROJECT NO(s) E13088 & E13089 SUBMITTED TO: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS CAPITAL PROGRAMS Corpus Chr sti Capital Programs SUBMITTED BY: raRVE, Inc. engineering — surveying TBPE Firm Reg. No. F-2037 September 12, 2014 Table of Contents ExecutiveSummary ................... I. Introduction Z 11. Street Improvements ? A. TRAFFIC STUDY & SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS 3 B. PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS 4 C. DRIVEWAYS, SIDEWALKS AND CURB RAMP IMPROVEMENTS 4 D. RTA (BUS) IMPROVEMENTS 5 E. STRIPING AND SIGNAGE IMPROVEMENTS 5 III. Drainage Improvements 5 A. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROJECT OBJECTIVES 5 B. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE EXISTING BOX CULVERTS 6 C. STORM SEWERIMPROVEMENTS ........................... 7 IV. Water Improvements 9 V. Wastewater Improvements 9 VI. Dry Utility Improvements l0 VII. Traffic Control 1 1 VIII. Opinion of Probable Cost l 2 IX. Summary & Engineer Recommendations 13 APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G Appendix H Appendix 1 Appendix J Appendix K Appendix L Appendix M Appendix N — Existing Conditions Map — Proposed Street & Utility improvements — Private Improvements in Right -of -Way — Traffic Study Merno — Geotechnical Report — 30 -Year Pavement Life Cycle Cost Analysis — Drainage Report & Supplement — Culvert Evaluation Report — Local Area Drainage Map — Ultimate Offsite Drainage Improvements — Existing Storm Trunk Line Profile — Proposed Storm "Trunk Line Profile — Existing 14" HP Gas Line Profile — Opinion of Probable Cost Gollihar Road Improvements — Kostoryz Road to Weber Road Final Engineering Letter Report Executive Summary On March 18, 2014 the City of Corpus Christi City Council executed a contract for engineering services with RVE, Inc. ("RVE") for Gollihar Road Improvements — Kostoryz Road to Weber Road (City Project No(s) E13088 & E13089) — the "Project". On March 20, 2014, RVE received a Notice to Proceed on the Project from the City Engineer. The Project includes the complete reconstruction of Gollihar Road from Kostoryz Road to Weber Road, approximately 5,300 feet in length. The objectives of the Project are to replace the existing deteriorated hot -mix asphalt concrete (1-HMAC) road, sidewalks and curb ramps with new infrastructure, provide bike lanes inside the curbs on both sides of the roadway, increase the capacity of the existing underground storm sewer system and upgrade the existing water and wastewater infrastructure. The Project will he funded by two (2) 2014 Bond Projects: Golliltar Road from Kostoryz Road to Carroll Lane (City Project No. E13089) and Gollihar Road from Carroll Lane to Weber Road (City Project No. E13088). The Project will be bid, however, as one project. Per the City's Urban Transportation Plan, Gollihar Road from Kostoryz Road to Weber Road is classified as an Al Arterial Street, which is to contain five (5) lanes in a 95' right-of- way. The existing road contains five (5) lanes - two (2) travel lanes in each direction and a center. continuous left -turn lane — in an 80' right-of-way. The Project does not include right-of-way acquisition to create a 95' right-of-way. The 5 -lane configuration will be maintained with the Project, however, in order to provide bike lanes within the curb on both sides of the road within the existing 80' right-of-way, the lane widths will be reduced. Two (2) 10.5' wide travel lanes will be provided in both directions with an II" wide continuous left -turn lane down the middle. Two (2) 4' wide bike lanes will be created on both sides of the new road adjacent to the curb. Tied, 5' wide concrete sidewalks will be provided on both sides of the new road. The total width of surface improvements is 75' with minor variances along the Project length, which allows a 2' to 3' separation between the back of proposed sidewalk and the 80' right-of-way. RVE recommends a new pavement section composed of HMAC based upon facts presented in this report. The local underground storm sewer collection system (laterals and curb inlets) will be replaced with new infrastructure with a 25 -year storm capacity. Additional large box culverts will be installed adjacent to the existing storm trunk line (box culverts) beneath Gollihar Road to increase the existing capacity to a 25 -year frequency rain event in accordance with the City's Drainage Criteria Manual. All non -PVC water laterals and all VCP wastewater mains and laterals will be replaced with new infrastructure. All wastewater manholes will be replaced or rehabilitated with fiberglass manholes or liners. The Project will be funded through a combination of street funds (2014 Bond) and C.I.P. utility funds. The City's estimated construction budget is $16.3 million. The preliminary Opinion of Probable Cost of the Project is $13.8 million: $4.3 million for street improvements and $9.5 million for utility improvements. Gollihar Road Improvements -- Kostoryz Road to Weber Road Final Engineering tetter Report Page 1 with the 60% Submittal Package. PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS On May 7, 2014, Rock Engineering and Testing, Inc. ("ROCK") prepared a geotechnical report containing information on the existing soils and pavement recommendations. ROCK performed eleven (11) pavement/soil borings in the field. Six (6) of the borings were taken to a depth of 20', and five (5) were taken to a depth of 5'. ROCK's report is attached in Appendix E. RVE: analyzed two (2) 30 -year pavement sections listed below: - Hot -mix, asphalt concrete (HMAC) section: and - Reinforced concrete section. We performed a 30 -year Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) on the two (2) options to determine the more economical section. Based upon the existing soil conditions on the Project, ROCK recommended the following 30 -year pavement sections: HMAC Pavement 2.0" Type `D' HMAC over 3.0" Type 'B' HMAC over 9" Type 'A', Grade 1 Limestone Base over TX -5 Geogrid (or equal) Reinforced Concrete Pavement 8" Jointed, Reinforced Concrete over 1" Type 'D' HMAC over 6" Type 'A', Grade I Limestone Base Typically, subgrade soils in the Corpus Christi area are found to be highly expansive with a Plasticity Index between 30 and 40. In those soil conditions, RVE recommends lime -stabilization of the subgrade under new pavement. The average Plasticity Index of the subgrade soils encountered on this Project, however, is 20. As such, lime -stabilization of the subgrade is not recommended on the Project. RVE. used the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) RealCost V2.5 program to perform a 30 -year LCCA on the two (2) pavement section options -- attached in Appendix F. The results of the analysis indicate that the Reinforced Concrete Pavement section is the more economical section after 30 years when both City Costs and User Costs are considered. The analysis results for each pavement option are listed below. The number in RED represents the lesser cost for each category. Pavement Section I-IMAC Pavement Reinf. Concrete Pavement Initial Construction Cost $2.82 Million $4.00 Million 30 -Yr. Present Value Cost (w/o User Costs) $3.72 Million $4.30 Million 30 -Yr. Present Value Cast (wl User Costs) $5.75 Million $6.00 Million Based upon the cost comparison presented above, RVE recommends that the City use the HMAC pavement option for the new road surface. Gollihar Road Improvements - Kostoryz Road to Weber Road Final Engineering tetter Report Page 4 DECEMBER 13, 2016 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES ATTACHMENT 3 City Council Meeting Minutes December 13, 2016 Council Member Garza made a motion to approve the ordinance, seconded by Council Member McComb. This Ordinance was passed on second reading as amended and approved with the following vote: Aye: 8 - Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Vaughn, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member McComb. Council Member Smith and Mayor McQueen Absent: 1 - Council Member Molina Abstained: 0 Enactment No: 031011 17, Second Reading Ordinance - Appropriating funds and approving Engineering Design Contracts for Residential Reconstruction Test Projects - Ralston Avenue and Rogerson Drive Ordinance appropriating 52,500,000 from the Unreserved Fund Balance in No. 1042 Residential and Local Street Fund for the Residential Reconstruction Test Projects - Ralston Avenue and Rogerson Drive; amending the FY 2017 Operating Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 030965; authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute a contract for engineering design services with Urban Engineering of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $88,420 for design of Ralston Avenue and Freese & Nichols, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of 597,764 for the design of Rogerson Drive. Mayor McQueen referred to item 17. Executive Director of Public Works Valerie Gray stated that the purpose of this item is to appropriate $2.5 million from the Residential and Local Street Fund for the Residential Reconstruction Test Projects - Ralston Avenue and Rogerson Drive and to execute two design contracts, one with Urban Engineering for the design of Ralston Avenue from Staples Street to Alameda, and one with Freese and Nichols for the design of Rogerson Drive from McArdle to Sunnybrook. Staff will use these two projects to provide better pricing information and data to further develop the program. Projects are planned to go out for bid in the May/June 2017 timeframe with construction projected for July 2017. Council members spoke regarding the following topics; the use of internal staff or consultants to monitor the program; Ralston Avenue and Rogerson Drive being two good candidates for the program; bidding both asphalt and concrete; what ether cities are doing on residential streets; the reason the engineering fees are different for the two projects; a future discussion of the use of concrete when developing new neighborhoods; the budgeted amount for residential and local streets; the initial intent of staff to design both streets using asphalt; the pothole repairs on both streets; public notification for residents regarding construction on the streets; a lifecycle cost analysis for concrete and asphalt; the current cost for concrete; whether the funding will Include curb and gutter; the cost matrix used to determine the difference In cost between pothole repair and reconstruction; options for cost-plus contracts; the percentage that these test projects are of all residential streets Corpus Christi Page 12 Printed on 12128/2016 City Council Meeting Minutes December 13, 2016 that require repairs; the opportunity to manufacture our own materials; creation of a council committee for residential streets; financing for residential streets; and the test projects providing better pricing information and data. Mayor McQueen called for comments from the public. Abel Alonzo, 1701 Thames, spoke in support of the use of concrete for residential streets. Sir Frederick von USA King VII, 1442 Arlington Drive, spoke in support of the use of asphalt. MOTION OF DIRECTION Council Member Vaughn made a motion directing the City Manager to bid the projects in both concrete and asphalt, seconded by Council Member Guajardo. This Motion of Direction was passed with the following vote: McQueen, Garza, Hunter, Guajardo, McComb, Molina, Rubio, and Vaughn, voting "Aye", Smith voting "No". Council Member Garza made a motion to approve the ordinance, seconded by Council Member Rubio. This Ordinance was passed on second reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 9 - Council Member Garza, Council Member Hunter, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Vaughn, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member McComb, Council Member Smith, Mayor McQueen and Council Member Molina Abstained: 0 Enactment No: 031013 18. Second Reading Ordinance - Continuing Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) Updated Service Credits for Current Participants and Increases for Prior and Current Annuities Ordinance authorizing and allowing, under the Act governing the Texas Municipal Retirement System, "Updated Service Credits" in said system for service performed by qualifying members of such system who presently are members of the City of Corpus Christi; providing for increased prior and current service annuities for retirees and beneficiaries of deceased retirees of the City; establishing an effective date for such actions; and providing for severance. Mayor McQueen referred to Item 18. Interim Director of Human Resources Steven Viera stated that the purpose of this item is to continue the Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) updated service credits for current participants and increases for current and prior annuities. These provisions adhere to the terms of the collective bargaining agreement with the Corpus Christi Police Officers' Association. Mr. Viera explained that unlike most public retirement systems, TMRS is a hybrid design instead of a defined benefit plan based on the percentage of salaries such as the City of Dallas. The TMRS plan is cash balanced in nature, meaning it is based on the contributions made by the employee, the matching amount by the City and interest income credited to the employee's account over the employee's career. Mr. Viera provided Corpus Christi Page 13 Printed on 1 2/2 812 01 6 December 20, 2016 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES ATTACHMENT 4 City Council Meeting Minutes December 20, 2016 MOTION TO RECONSIDER Council Member McComb made a motion to reconsider the motion of direction for Item No. 17 on the December 13, 2016 agenda, seconded by Council Member Vaughn. This motion to reconsider was passed and approved with the following vote: McQueen, Guajardo, Hunter, McComb, Molina, Smith, Vaughn, and Garza, voting' .Aye"; Rubio voting "No` MOTION OF DIRECTION Council Member McComb made a motion directing the City Manager to bid reconstruction projects in both concrete and asphalt, not repair projects, seconded by Council Member Smith and passed unanimously. J. CONSENT AGENDA: (ITEMS 3 - 26) 3. 4. Approval of the Consent Agenda Mayor McQueen referred to the Consent Agenda. Council members requested that items 8, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18 be pulled for individual consideration. City Manager Rose requested that Item 26 be pulled for individual consideration. A motion was made by Council Member Garza, seconded by Council Member Smith, to approve the Consent Agenda. The consent agenda items were passed and approved by one vote as follows: Aye: 9 - Mayor McQueen, Council Member Garza, Council Member Guajardo, Council Member Hunter. Council Member McComb. Council Member Molina, Council Member Rubio. Council Member Smith and Council Member Vaughn Abstained: 0 Appointing Board Members to the Corpus Christi Housing Finance Corporation and the Corpus Christi Industrial Development Corporation Motion appointing Council Members Dan McQueen, Michael T. Hunter, Joe McComb, Paulette Guajardo, Carolyn Vaughn, Ben Molina, Lucy Rubio, Greg Smith, and Rudy Garza as Board Members to the Corpus Christi Housing Finance Corporation and the Corpus Christi Industrial Development Corporation. This Motion was passed on the Consent Agenda. Enactment No: M2016-162 Appointing Board Members to the Coastal Bend Health Facilities Development Corporation and the Coastal Bend Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation Motion appointing Council Members Dan McQueen, Michael T. Hunter, Joe McComb, Paulette Guajardo, Carolyn Vaughn, Ben Molina, Lucy Rubio, Greg Smith, and Rudy Garza as Board Members to the Coastal Bend Health Facilities Development Corporation and Corpus Christi Page 4 Printed on 1117120}7 SEPTEMBER 22, 2015 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES ATTACHMENT 5 City Council Meeting Minutes September 22, 2015 18. First Reading Ordinance - Construction Contract and Construction Materials Testing Contract for Williams Drive Phase 3 from Staples Street to Airline Road (Bond 2012) Ordinance appropriating anticipated revenues; authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a construction contract with Reytec Construction Resources, Inc. of Houston, Texas in the amount of $8,698,783.50 for the Base Bid; and to execute a construction materials testing contract with Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. of Corpus Christi, Texas in the amount of $112,135 for Williams Drive Phase 3 from Staples Street to Airline Road (BOND 2012). Mayor Pro Tem Vaughn referred to Item 18. Executive Director of Public Works Valerie Gray stated that the purpose of this item is to execute a construction contract with Reytec Construction Resources, Inc. and a construction materials testing contract with Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. for Bond 2012 Street Project, Williams Drive Phase 3 from Staples Street to Airline Road. This project is a joint project with the City of Corpus Christi and the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), which includes: the widening of Williams Drive and the replacement of the existing two-lane asphalt road with a new four -lane concrete road; new 10 -foot wide, combined pedestrian/bicycle paths on both side of the street; the replacement of six RTA pads; and utility improvements. The project is estimated to be completed by February 2017. There were no comments from the public. Council members spoke regarding the following topics: bidding the project with asphalt and concrete (Additive Alternate Nos. 1 and 2); Indication that other projects are being bid with concrete as the lowest bids; and Additive Alternate No. 2 including wastewater lines. Council Member Garza made a motion to approve the ordinance, seconded by Council Member McIntyre. This Ordinance was passed on first reading and approved with the following vote: Aye: 6 - Council Member Garza, Council Member Magill, Council Member McIntyre, Council Member Rubio, Council Member Scott and Council Member Vaughn Absent: 3 - Mayor Martinez, Council Member Riojas and Council Member Rosas Abstained: 0 19. First Reading Ordinance - Appropriating capital proceeds accrued from June 1, 2014 through July 31, 2015 in their respective Capital Improvement Program Funds Ordinance appropriating amounts of (a) $13,184.50; (b) $290,604.57 (c) $484,822.06; (d) $47,395.11; and (e) $192,120.28 into the Airport CIP, Bond Proceed, Utility Revenue Bond, Specialty Bond Proceeds and other Unappropriated Funds, respectively, for the following purposes: City's match for future FAA Grant Projects, Bayfront, Public Facilities, Fire, Police, Public Health and Safety, Sanitary Landfill, Corpus Christi Page 12 Printed on 9/29/2015 BOND 2014 CURRENT AND PROPOSED PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENT 6 Street Bond Projects - Pavement Recommendations PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT TITLE Bond STATUS Current Design Proposed Design 113099 Waldron Rd (Airdame Dr to Caribbean Or) Bond 2014 Prop 1 Complete HMAC HMAC E13100 Santa Fe 5t (Elizabeth 5t to Hancock 5t) Bond 2014 Prop 1 Complete HMAC HMAC 113095 Southern Minerals Rd (tip River Rd to iH-37) Bond 2014 Prop 1 Construction PCC PCC E13086 Alameda 5t (Kinney 5t to ligan St) Bond 2014 Prop 1 Construction HMAC HMAC E1S111 North Padre Island Beach Access Road 3A Bond 2014 Prop 2 Construction PCC PCC E13088(E13089 Gollihar Rd (Weber Rd. to Carroll In.) Fiord 2014 Prop 1 Council Award HMAC HMAC 5130137 Galli har Rd (South Staples to Weber Rd) Bond 2014 Prop 1 Council Award HMAC HMAC 015109 Ennis loslin Road Extension (Hotly to Williams) Bond 2014 Prop 7 Cnnec1 Award HMAC HMAC 013092 Ayers St (Alameda 5t to Ocean Dr) Bond 2014 Prop 1 Bidding HMAC HMAC E13096 Yorktown Blvd (Everhart Rd to Staples St) Bond 2014 Prop 1 Pending Bid Both Both (13097 Carroll Lane{Houston St to MCArdie Rd) Bond 2014 Prop 1 Pending Bid HMAC HMAC €13091 Carona Dr (Flynn Pkwy to Everhart Rd) Bond 2014 Prop 1 Pending Bid HMAC HMAC €15122 Creek View Drive Extension Bond 2014 Prop 2 Final HMAC HMAC E15111 North Padre Island Beath Access Road 2 Bond 2014 Prop 2 Pre-FVnal PCC PCC 513099 Old Robstown Rd (Highway 44 to Leopard St) Bond 2014 Prop 1. Pre -Final HMAC HMAC €13093 Yorktown Blvd (Lake Travis to Everhart Rd) Bond 2014 Prop 1 Pre -Final HMAC HMAC 015106 Ayers St- Pedestrian improvements and Turn Lane Bond 2014 Prop 2 75% HMAC HMAC 113094 Staples St (Alameda 5t to Morgan 5t) Bond 2014 Prop 1 60% Both Both (15107 Chaparral Street - Phase 2 (Schatael to Taylor) Bond 2014 Prop 2 30% HMAC Both 115110 Flato Road - Agnes to Bates Bond 2014 Prop 30% HMAC Both E15112 Rodd Field Road Expansion (Saratoga to Yorktown) Bond 2014 Prop 2 30% HMAC Both 133090 Morgan Ave (Staples St to Ocean Dr) Bond 2014 Prop 1 On Ho)4 Both Both PCC HMAC Both Advertised or in Construction